Slashdot Mirror


List of Polish Spies Leaked On The Internet

An anonymous reader writes "A list of 240,000 names of Polish secret agents, informers, secret service employees, and victims of persecution was leaked on the internet in the last days and became an instant hit. The search for "lista Wildsteina" (Wildstein's list) sky-rocketed to 300,000 per day in the second most popular search engine in Poland (onet.pl) outperforming "sex" (former top query) by more than 30 times. The list appeared on many web sites, p2p networks, and was made into a searchable database. There are worries the list might contain names of active security agents, still working abroad. Google news has more coverage."

197 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. Text of An Article by Omkar · · Score: 4, Informative

    A leaked list containing the names of some 240,000 people who allegedly spied for Poland's former communist regime has overtaken sex as the hottest search item on the Internet in Poland, press reports has said. "This thing is huge. We have recorded around 100,000 Internet searches a day for the list, which is 10 times the number looking for sex," Piotr Tchorzewski, who works at Poland's biggest Internet portal Onet, told Rzeczpospolita daily. The list, which contains in alphabetical order the names of alleged agents and collaborators of the communist-ero secret service, mixed together with the names of those who were allegedly spied on, has also been put up for auction on the Internet, but its bid price late yesterday -- 2.99 zlotys (around 75 euro cents) -- was hardly breaking records. On Onet's web portal, it tops the list of search items, and visitors are referred to 650,000 links for the controversial collection of names that has pushed the attorney general to launch legal proceedings and Prime Minister Marek Belka to express concern for the safety of active intelligence agents whose names "might" be on the list. The list, dubbed the Wildstein List after Bronislaw Wildstein, the journalist who secretly copied it around two weeks ago at the national archives, can change from one Internet consultation to the next, as hackers have been adding or taking off names, press reports said. From The Hindustan Times

  2. Not a list of spies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not a list of spies but a list of people who were on the records of former communist Polish spies, which includes spies, would-be-spies, people who refused to be spies and victims of spies. Saying that it is a list of spies is harmful for most of the people from that list. Please don't spread outright lies.

    1. Re:Not a list of spies by Daleks · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ah. I thought the number of 240,000 seemed high for spycount for a country the size of Poland. The CIA would be jealous if it had the budget for 240,000 actual clandestine agents.

    2. Re:Not a list of spies by HillBilly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Too late, this is slashdot, no one reads the article.

      --
      "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
    3. Re:Not a list of spies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah. I thought the number of 240,000 seemed high for spycount for a country the size of Poland.

      Not really. The list is from Communist party days. In Poland and other Eastern European countries, there were very many domestic spies. The government was paranoid. Millions of people were spied on. Also there were spies to spy on other spies, (like in Juvenal's satires) and so on.

    4. Re:Not a list of spies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The better word would be "informers" or "snitches". The point is about people who would snitch on their coworkers or neigbours.

      The problem is, the list does not have any real info what the particular person was doing. They infer record type from file id accompanying the name, but it seems not exact. Then when you find someone you know there, you don't know is he was reporting on you, been spied on, employed in ministry of internal affairs or maybe just "checked out".

      According to one version I was secret police officer. They must have wiped my memory as I can't remember working for them...

    5. Re:Not a list of spies by biglig2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, while I'm not an expert on espionage, I suspect that most agencies try to avoid writing the names of all their spies on one piece of paper. That would seem to me to be a basic.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    6. Re:Not a list of spies by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      It's probably an issue of something that was locked in some anonymous file cabinet and lost after Mother Russia passed on. couple personell moves, and files can grow legs.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    7. Re:Not a list of spies by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Not quite. When you run a network of paid informers, you must have some accounting, otherwise you'd be paying through the nose.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    8. Re:Not a list of spies by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      The CIA budget is on the order of $30 billion USD. They can afford quite a few spies.

    9. Re:Not a list of spies by maxgilead · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are *only* 240 000 names on that list because it's far from being completed. Leon Kieres, head of Polish Institute of National Remembrance (IPN) estimates that completed list will count abount 1.5 MILION of names. Of course, names of spies, would-be spies and their victims, not spies alone (source: article from Gazeta Wyborcza).

      Please also note that name 'spy' used in this news is a bit misleading. They were not James Bond-style spies, they were actually called 'secret collaborators' and most of them spied upon their oppositionist friends, family etc. I suppose in any post-communist their numbers were that high if not higher.

    10. Re:Not a list of spies by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lies or not, this is a wake-up call for any entity that stores personal data within easy reach of the internet. It is an example of how easily personal data can become public knowledge. The next time you get a virus or piece of spyware on your corporate desktop, think how easily this "program" could be used to target other forms of sensitive information and not just your keystrokes.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    11. Re:Not a list of spies by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      You mispelt beaurocrats as spies.

    12. Re:Not a list of spies by decimal0 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they should just call it "The Poland White Pages".

    13. Re:Not a list of spies by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      this is slashdot, no one reads the article.
      That sounds rather unlikely, considering the slashdot effect.
    14. Re:Not a list of spies by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      They must have wiped my memory as I can't remember working for them...
      You should have known better. Where was your tin-foil hat?
    15. Re:Not a list of spies by psi42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That sounds rather unlikely, considering the slashdot effect.

      Not any more. Thanks to the wonderful tabbed browsing feature of modern web browsers, slashdotters can now open the story in a new tab, make a comment, and then close the tab holding TFA. This saves slashdotters the time of actually reading an article, but preserves their reputation as heralds of server meltdown.

      --
      Defenestrate Windows...
    16. Re:Not a list of spies by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course, you have to have accounting etc.

      But what you don't do is write everyone's name down on one piece of paper. Because then you have a single piece of paper that someone can steal/photocopy/see when they weren't supposed to.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    17. Re:Not a list of spies by agentkhaki · · Score: 1

      As if being caught spying wasn't bad enough, now you're saying the secret agents are getting their nether-regions shot off by The Bad Guys...?

      Man alive! I thought you said The 'Real' Bad Guys weren't into the whole elaborate death thing...

      --
      Ack!
    18. Re:Not a list of spies by RWerp · · Score: 1

      This is true if you run a spy network in a foreign country. But running a network of paid snitches in your own backyard, you don't have to worry too much about papers leaking out -- I do not recollect any Polish oppositionists stealing secret service archives before 1989.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    19. Re:Not a list of spies by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      ~3% of adult males being spies would be indeed ridiculous.

      Not to say you're incorrect, but why do spies/agents have to be male or adult? I don't think that has been a requirement for many decades - if ever.

    20. Re:Not a list of spies by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      According to one version I was secret police officer. They must have wiped my memory as I can't remember working for them...

      That's the spirit, comrad. Tell them nothing.

    21. Re:Not a list of spies by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      Ever watched Mission impossible?

  3. Holy Bondage, Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    240,000 secret agents?!

    If everybody is a secret agent, it doesn't seem that 'secret' anymore...

    1. Re:Holy Bondage, Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the levels of paranoia and spying ran so deep in some Warsaw Pact countries that ratios as high as 1/7th of the population were in some way affiliated with the intelligence agencies. Romania and East Germany were especially bad in this way.

      There is alot of carryon about Soviet Russia, but post-Stalin it was actually one of the better 'communist' countries in live in. But Yugoslavia was probably the best until it blew up.

    2. Re:Holy Bondage, Batman! by acb · · Score: 1

      East Germany had something similar; the Stasi had hundreds of thousands of informers, with them literally being everywhere.

    3. Re:Holy Bondage, Batman! by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1, Informative

      The thing is that 95% of these people were not "spies" in the way that we think. They were folks who for an extra few marks or rubles would rat on their neighbors. Most of them were probably old age pensioners for whom an extra loaf of bread once a week would make a *BIG* difference. Eastern Europe under Comunsism was a very poor place.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    4. Re:Holy Bondage, Batman! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Of course, we think "spies" are like James Bond. Lots of American spies are exactly like these Poles: informants paid by our spy agencies to provide info at least once, perhaps the only info ever gathered was on their husband or carpool. Still sleazy, still valuable.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  4. Quick! by tavilach · · Score: 1

    Polish Spies: Quick! Turn off the internet! Seriously, though, this must be a horrible predicament to be in for anyone who was once a Polish spy.

    --

    "Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world." -Archimedes
    1. Re:Quick! by Wudbaer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only thing I really find bad is that a lot of people are on the list who are likely innocent like people refusing to become snitches or worse, even victims.

      Regarding the spies themselves: They had it coming to them. They destroyed lives of neighbours, co-workers and even friends and family, so I honestly don't give a rats ass what happens to them.

    2. Re:Quick! by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure their unwitting families have it coming too?

    3. Re:Quick! by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

      The same with being the family of a bank robber, a killer or a rapist: Most of the time the family didn't have an idea what was going on and so basically is innocent but does have to bear the fallout. But should for that reason bank robbers, killers and rapists not be prosecuted ?

      Before you say that one cannot compare some "innocent" snitching to raping, killing and robbing: Basically that is what those people did. In extreme cases they caused other peoples death, they caused them often extreme undeserved hardship, and in the end inflicted similar emotional wounds than rape. And that out of hate, indifference and because of the promise of some petty privileges. Is a new refrigerator really worth your lovers demise ? Is it worth snitching on your patients if you are a doctor, sometimes even recommending a course to ruin them psychically or physically ?

  5. The Internet is at it again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Department of Homeland Security should definitely do something about this Internet thingy.

    1. Re:The Internet is at it again! by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Funny

      They will as soon as the guys over at the National Security Agency will tell them how to use it.

      What do you think all this 'information sharing' is about, anyways.

      It's just a secret plot to rope the guys at the NSA into doing tech support for the other departments.

      "URLs? Um... the CIA told me that they were a mountain range in Western Russia.... Yeah, they seemed pretty sure sir, but I keep typing that in the little white box and it doesn't seem to be able to find them... No sir, I don't know why we're looking for them on the computer. Yes sir, It probably would be easier just to use a map."

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    2. Re:The Internet is at it again! by grozzie2 · · Score: 1

      Not to worry, this came from the spies, and is about spies. It's just as accurate as the reports of imminent attack from iraq, with all the stockpiles of nuclear and chemical weapons they have.

    3. Re:The Internet is at it again! by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > I know it was modded as funny, but the DOHS plan on actually doing something about the internet.

      What makes you think it hasn't already happened.

      It's no secret that the 'net is the greatest domestic intelligence treasure trove in history. Not only do society's unreliable elements self-register as such with the authorities, but they do so voluntarily.

      STASI had about 10-15% of its population as informants, and wrecked its economy while doing so. We got 50-60% coverage, and our informants paid for the privilege!

    4. Re:The Internet is at it again! by WillWare · · Score: 1
      The Department of Homeland Security should definitely do something about this Internet thingy.

      Don't you mean these Internet thingies? Do we even know how many of these Internets there are?

      --
      WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
    5. Re:The Internet is at it again! by stevejobsjr · · Score: 1

      You misspelled "Urals."

    6. Re:The Internet is at it again! by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1


      Tell me that you actually understood the joke and you're just trolling...

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    7. Re:The Internet is at it again! by stevejobsjr · · Score: 1

      Not trolling, just playing the fool.

  6. Maybe they were looking for sex... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who wouldn't want to have sex with a spy?
    You could play some James Bond theme song in the background for added effect, and even wear an eyepatch.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:Maybe they were looking for sex... by aurb · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who wouldn't want to have sex with a spy?

      Damn, I wish I was on that list.

    2. Re:Maybe they were looking for sex... by mikelang · · Score: 2, Informative

      You obviously do not know, what communist regime spies were acting like.

      They were searching in the country for evidence of any "unlawful thinking" using any means possible. More like Orwell's "1984".

      Main modes of operation included blackmail and intimidation. When it didn't work, then suspects went to prison or "disappeared" (a.k.a. were assassinated) like famous priest - Popieluszko.

    3. Re:Maybe they were looking for sex... by yess · · Score: 1

      You gave a flamebait. Remember that Poland used to be ruled by totalitary system. Polish Security Service was similar to such services in Saddam's Iraq (just an example). It fought against democracy and basic civil laws. It's daily routine included tortures, kidnapping innocent family members etc. It just doesn't sound like James Bond movie to me.

    4. Re:Maybe they were looking for sex... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      In "The Unbearable Lightness of Being" a Communist agent has sex with one of the heroines and takes pictures for the purpose of blackmail.

      Kundera was sufficiently acquainted with communist regeimes to know what he was writing about.

      So nyahh.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    5. Re:Maybe they were looking for sex... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that the people doing this spying would probably be over 40 by now. yuck

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    6. Re: Maybe they were looking for sex... by JumperCable · · Score: 1

      Please use proper terminology. It's called a condom, not an eye patch.

    7. Re:Maybe they were looking for sex... by Triv · · Score: 1
      True story: my roommate and I were talking about the whole 'don't sleep with your friends' exes rule and agreed that, while on principle this was a good idea for the balance of all relationships concerned, there were also a few stereotypical professions that just HAD to be nailed if the opportunity arose, just...well, because it's the kind of thing that only comes around once. Please note that we both go after women here; can't speak on the other side of the fence.

      One of those stereotypes (apart from the 'stern librarian/kindergarten teacher one) was a spy. The roomie had a friend who TURNED DOWN SEX WITH AN UNDERCOVER CIA AGENT because she had dated his friend. Upon our relatively sober reflection the roomie and I decided that the man needed a testosterone injection, a bond marathon and was banned from all pornography for two weeks as punishment. I mean, really - who wouldn't sleep with a spy if they offered?

    8. Re:Maybe they were looking for sex... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      A loser whose porn is controlled by his roommates, who believes a fat chick's lies about being a spy?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:Maybe they were looking for sex... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Not to mention the fact that the people doing this spying would probably be over 40 by now. yuck

      Attention Citizen 95676.

      [redacted] - - [06/Feb/2004:14:02:25 PDT] "GET www.[redacted].com/gallery/SpILF/poland001.html HTTP/1.0"

      You were saying?

    10. Re:Maybe they were looking for sex... by Chapium · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, Bond. (Awesome music + a bit of James Bond theme) http://www.bondmusic.net/

    11. Re:Maybe they were looking for sex... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Hm?

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  7. Hackers are just so dang tricky by bbkingadrock · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hackers are so good with computers, did you read what they can do these days (from an article on google news)

    "hackers have been adding or taking off names"

    that is amazing they have figured out how to compromise the security of a text document and add or delete names from it

    1. Re:Hackers are just so dang tricky by physicsphairy · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the Polish ops probably have an interest in compromising various lists and distributing numerous altered copies to do as much as they can to protect their agents.

    2. Re:Hackers are just so dang tricky by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Polish ops now are not similar to PRL's (name of Poland as a communist state) special ops. They don't need that much informers. But rumors are that the list contains the names of active military intelligence officers, also working abroad. If this is true, they're in deep sh..t.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
  8. Aha! by kaedemichi255 · · Score: 3, Funny

    At long last I will track down, hunt, and kill my arch nemesis, Polish Sausage!

    1. Re:Aha! by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Said the hotdog to the bun

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  9. So let's post it on Slashdot! by physicsphairy · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is either 1. ironic 2. a Polish strategy for making the list inaccesible

  10. Will you do your patriotic duty? by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Funny

    The search for "lista Wildsteina" (Wildstein's list) sky-rocketed to 300,000 per day in the second most popular search engine in Poland (onet.pl) outperforming "sex" (former top query) by more than 30 times.

    I don't know about you, but I'm going to do my darndest to help make sure this oversight is rectified.

    1. Re:Will you do your patriotic duty? by marq00z · · Score: 1

      That's Wildstein: http://tvp.pl/120,20050201173718.strona

  11. Why? by Freon115 · · Score: 1

    Why post about it on slashdot then? It will make it even more popular.

    Oh snap, after all they are only polish, nobody cares about what happens to them.[/sarcasm]

    1. Re:Why? by Loonacy · · Score: 1

      If you ever want to make something inaccessable, post a URL to it on /.

  12. OMG by nate+nice · · Score: 4, Funny

    pwned.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    1. Re:OMG by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      No, polowned.

  13. Polish spies and undercover agents... by ATAMAH · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can just imagine how it would sound in a movie: My name is Wolschansky, Vojzeh Wolschansky.

  14. Re:Wonder who leaked this? by aurb · · Score: 1

    I believe they did it.

  15. Industrial espionage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    240,000 polish spies? I never imagined the cleaning products industry was so secretive,

  16. There are worries? by splatterboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    "There are worries the list might contain names of active security agents, still working abroad."

    "There are worries..."?

    There's an understatement.

    --
    "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." ~The Honorable Daniel Patrick Moynihan
  17. Spies don't kill people! by Cryptnotic · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...oh wait, nevermind.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  18. Re:First Polock Joke! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    or "Jackson."

  19. RTFAs!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wonder who leaked this? I doubt it was the guy, nobody would want to get on the bad side of former-communist spy agencies.

    God! This is the most stupid comment I've ever read! No one "leaked" it, because it was a PUBLIC LIST anyone could read in the libraries of Polish Institute of National Remembrance! No one bothered to actually go there and read those names until Bronislaw Wildstein, a journalist which just an ordinary access to those files as any citizen, copied the files and gave them to few fellow journalists, who gave it to others and made a big fuzz about it calling it a "list of spies" which it isn't and which Wildstein never misrepresented as such. Please get some clue before you post another misinformation. Thank you. What is a much more important issue here is the fact that Wildstein has lost his job in a supposedly independent newspaper Rzeczpospolita because of giving others public documents which were not even classified. This is a serious question about the freedom of speech in Poland. The fuzz about "spies" is just bullshit. What is important here is that most of independent journalists think that Wildstein shouldn't have taken that list and given it to others and that any "responsible journalist" would never do it. We are talking about a publicly available not classified data here! This is important, not your Orwellian phobias about being "on the bad side of former-communist spy agencies." Take off your tinfoil hat and think about free speech for a while. And actually read something about this list.

    1. Re:RTFAs!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      and then you just wasted your mod by posting to the same discussion you modded.

    2. Re:RTFAs!!! by marq00z · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's just BS.

      It's not true that it is available to anyone - not everybody is allowed to read these stuff. You have to be either a professional historian or a victim of the communist regime.

      The real problem is that this "list of spies" consists just of the names and surnames and a "primary key" (if you like sql-speak ;)). Nothing more, nothing less.

      And these are the names of the spies, the victims of the Security Service, people who refused to be spies and innocent people about whom the Security Service just thought "They might be nice spies some day, let's collect some data about them".

      Also, if you saw "John Smith" on that list you couldn't be sure if it was the John Smith, your father or someone else. But for people who hate your father this would be "a 100% proof" your father's a bad guy. And they'd tell anyone "hey, Smith was a Security Service agent!"

      Wildstein just wants publicity, he does not care about such people as that hypothetical John Smith.

    3. Re:RTFAs!!! by RWerp · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wildstein had the right to read the list and use the info in his journalist research, not to carry it from the IPN's library. Those are two different things. There is also the issue of privacy protection -- he distributed the names of 240,000 people, most of them who are not public figures. This pictures him as an irresponsible man.

      Wildstein publicly said that he doesn't care if his actions harm our currently working intelligence agencies. It's equivalent to an American saying "I don't care if I put CIA/FBI agent's lives in danger". Wildstein is a fanatic, who puts grand ideas above individual people. In this aspect, he's as communist as you could possibly be.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    4. Re:RTFAs!!! by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like it was restricted. If you think there's only "classified" and "unclassified" in this world, please get a clue.

    5. Re:RTFAs!!! by RWerp · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was a specialty of communists, to put ideology above individual human beings. "Masses are everything, one person means nothing" -- an old communist motto.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    6. Re:RTFAs!!! by compling · · Score: 1

      wtf ? what does putting grand ideas have to do with communism ? this independent of ideology - a country just got invaded for "democracy", or at least many would accept that as an acceptably motivation.

    7. Re:RTFAs!!! by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      these are not top agents. Just some shmucks that were asked to sign a paper that they would inform the authorities. Not all of them did afterwards. Often this kind of thing was required for traveling to West or getting a promotion, rigt to publish, etc. Plus in the list there are also people that were "worked on" by state security to be recruited/set up into becoming a confidant. Typicaly under blackmail. ("We know what you are involved in and you don't have to lose your job/ go to jail if you give us some information"). Then there were carierists, often recruited in college ("you are young and perspective, we can help you to get ahead"). And some retired Nosy Parkers who liked to report on their neighbours.

      In Czechoslovakia, the list came out in early 90s thanks to an activist and former political prisoner Cibulka.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    8. Re:RTFAs!!! by vettemph · · Score: 1

      >>"I don't care if I put CIA/FBI agent's lives in danger"

      I thought the high you get from working for the Federation/CIA/FBI/man was specifically from your life being in danger. Thats what drives these dickheads to work thier. :) It'a all a big power/danger high.

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    9. Re:RTFAs!!! by Eminence · · Score: 1

      Wildstein had the right to read the list and use the info in his journalist research, not to carry it from the IPN's library. Those are two different things.

      This is total rubbish. So he had the right to carry it out of there in his head but not in his laptop (or traditional, paper and pencil notebook or whatever)? You really don't see how illogical and plainly stupid that statement is? Too much of Gazeta Wyborcza, I guess?

    10. Re:RTFAs!!! by Eminence · · Score: 1

      Often this kind of thing was required for traveling to West or getting a promotion, rigt to publish, etc.

      Required? Naa.... You always could pass on that excursion to Rome or don't get promoted. There was a choice. Since the end of fifties no one pressed a gun to anyone's head to force him to inform. And, sorry pal, there were people who did the right thing and plainly said no. Those who didn't are scum, even if I can feel sorry for them. They choose wrong then, they should pay now at least by being exposed.

    11. Re:RTFAs!!! by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been to the library? You can read the books, but not carry them out. Just because something is technically possible, it's not legit. Too much of "Wprost" and "Najwyszy Czas", perhaps?

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    12. Re:RTFAs!!! by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      I am not sorry for snitches - I was just trying to point out that the nature of the most of the agents was more mundane - not realy Bond types.

      My classmate was arrested, interrogated and coerced by State Security in Prague. They wanted him to report on fellow church-goers. He said no - - even when they anounced him that he would be kicked out of university.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    13. Re:RTFAs!!! by MaDeR · · Score: 1

      Innocent people who will be marked as "spy scum" too. Yeah, I know. "Gdzie drwa rabia, tam wiory leca". Wildstein is complete idiot, if not right-winged fanatic. You too, I see. You and him not care about antyhing - except of witch hunting.

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
  20. I believe it was Churchill who said... by flopsy+mopsalon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "If you pick at the scab of history, the blood will flow in the streets. Could there be more appropriate words for this event? I think not.

    Years after the fall of communism, it seems some still bear enough of a grudge at the discredited regime that they will painstakingly assemble and disseminate a long list of names of individuals involved in espionage-related events. That the list was so quickly spread around the net and even turned into a database, together with its phenomenal popularity among internet users, indicated that many in Poland still have axes and possibly even scythes to grind over wrongs perpretrated during the Communist era.

    Doubtless, reputations will be besmirched and careers ruined, some no doubt unjustly. And to what end? The ills of communism were many, but they are in the past. This obssessive assembling of databases serves only to dig up moldering corpses just to piss on their shoes.

    People need to look ahead. Whether it be Poles still smarting over Communist-era misdeeds, Islamic radicals seeking to undo the fall of Muslim civilization, or outraged citizens suing television networks over breasts bared at Superbowl halftime shows, this endless fretting over the past only engenders further dismay. The dead cannot be unkilled, last year's breast cannot be covered today. Let it go.

    1. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by r84x · · Score: 1

      those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it

      --
      Karma: Can there be a void?

      .. -. - . .-. .-. --- -...

    2. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      If something like this were released, I suppose the only way to 'hide' it would be to release a bunch of false copies so the information was not reliable.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    3. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      No, those corpses are still fresh.

      If we're lucky, we can still get another war out of them before they're cold and forgotten.

      Or at least a few covert operations\assassinations.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    4. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Doubtless, reputations will be besmirched and careers ruined, some no doubt unjustly. And to what end? The ills of communism were many, but they are in the past.

      It's never that simple. The past is always embedded in the present. If you are African-American, you could happily forget the slave past, but you can't escape the question "why my skin color makes it impossible for me to buy a flat in Upper Manhattan?". If you think Central Europe is the only region of the world haunted by ghosts from past crimes... then think again. Or better yet, talk to some Nisei, to some Native Americans or just watch "Graveyard Of The Fireflies" anime with some Japanese friend. So if you are in Poland, you are more than eager to forget about the communist past. But forget it or not, you will still ask yourself this question: why I am a poor wage-slave or unemploeyd, while my secret service tormentor has now a management position in some state-owned company?

    5. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by RWerp · · Score: 1

      But it's not about communist secret service officers. They have good jobs, started their companies or draw good pensions. Except for those which did the most horrendous things, like murder, it's part of the deal we made with the communists in 1989. They gave away the power peacefully, in return they were not harassed or punished for every wrong and immoral thing they did. In this situation, isn't it a bit hypocritical to go after people broken by the secret service and turned into snitches, if we let the main actors go peacefully?

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    6. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by mrogers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those who study history are also doomed to repeat it, but with a greater sense of foreboding.

    7. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by Zsoltika · · Score: 1

      Well I can really understand those who still bear grudge. I live in Hungary (also once under communist control). I personaly never experienced any of the bad sides of communism, because I was too young then. But in my family a few were fired from work after saying something like "I wonder what life is like in west germany" or got their parents in prison, and themselves fired from college/university because they had a relative/or even neighbour who labeled as a spy by someone unknown.

      And quite of few of them still lives today, and they hate the spies who made there best friends, neighbours disappear. And they never knew who was it.

      So I understand if they try to find out who ruined their lives.

      btw In Hungary the so called spy lists are still sealed from the public by every government since the system change.

    8. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by Zigurd · · Score: 1

      The Soviet Empire ran, as evidenced by the numbers of people on this list, a large system of snitches.

      We can only benefit from today's snitches considering if they will be on tommorow's list.

    9. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by Alomex · · Score: 1

      why I am a poor wage-slave or unemploeyd, while my secret service tormentor has now a management position in some state-owned company?

      You mean why I am black, poor and unemployed while my tormentor, who was one of the most racist politicians in his younger years died as the longest serving US Senator (Strom Thurmond) while a similar one makes a go for it (Robert Byrd)?

      Should we have compiled a list of all of those who spoused racist views? Made it available on the Internet? Denied them jobs?

    10. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by Maudib · · Score: 1

      Just felt like adding a quick defense of NYC. There is little to no racism in the housing market here. Redlining has been gone for twenty years, and while descrimination certainly occurs on a socio-economic basis, a wealth african american family will find purchasing a condo just as easy as a wealthy white family.

      Of course if your poor in NYC (Earn less then 100k) you can forget about purchasing property anywhere on the island.

    11. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Er, I agree with you, but your example is bad. "Upper Manhattan" is more accurately named as "Harlem", known for dark-skinned people, from African to Caribbean in ancestry. And even in the "Upper East Side" (billionaire neighborhood actually), it's usually possible to buy an apartment with real money, regardless of one's ancestry. Though it is more difficult for non-WASPs generally, an unacceptable situation. New York City remains one of the most accessible places in the world for people of any ancestry to "make it". Now Texas...

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, and yes - if the jobs involve public office. However, the first two yes answers don't require explanation; the third one does. We should have denied them public office at the polls.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by Illserve · · Score: 1

      Everything's in the past, starting from right now.

      Where do you draw the line? If I killed a friend of yours, it's in the past as soon as I've done it. By your advice, shouldn't you just "let it go?"

      The idea of punishment as a deterrant is founded on the principle of NOT letting it go.

    14. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by Alomex · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, and yes - if the jobs involve public office.

      Well it certainly didn't happen. Thurmond and Byrd are not the only ones (Trent Lott anyone?, plus many others), by the way, simply they are the most glaring examples.

    15. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Texas is hardly liveable with its depths of depravity. NYC is far better. And the millions of poor people who live here ain't headin' south so fast, despite the blizzards.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    16. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by wkitchen · · Score: 1

      For those particular examples, I doubt that outing them on a list would have had much effect. The racism of Thurmond and Byrd is widely known already. Yet they got votes anyway. That hints at a very ugly, but almost certainly true, suspicion that many of the votes these people received were precisely because of their racism. Aside from those who are openly racist, there are many people who will publicly denounce racism yet privately condone it. Voting is private. So when they vote, they express their private desires instead of polishing their public image.

      But still, this is progress. Because at least they recognize the wrongness enough to be ashamed of it.

    17. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      It's never that simple. The past is always embedded in the present.
      I think it's true, but the key question is: do you DWELL on the past or get on with life? Do you blame the past for your failures today, instead of examining yourself seriously? SOMETIMES, there's just bad luck and you can either rail against anonymous fate or move forward.
      Maybe you can't get a flat in upper manhattan simply because you're simply insufficiently 'connected'? (I sincerely doubt that there are NO blacks in Upper Manhattan, or that Wesely Snipes, Denzel Washington, or Halle Berry would have trouble getting an apartment there...).
      As a Native American, do you sit in an unemployed stupor, angry about how your ancestors were exploited? Or do you take advantage of the MULTITUDE of (compensatory) programs established for your benefit - free college, anyone?
      I generally think that anger and bitterness has NEVER accomplished anything.

      --
      -Styopa
    18. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      C'mon, man - it's the evil empire down there, with the kind of numbing depravity that makes flesh crawl and women celibate. We don't have anything like Matamoros up here, at least not on their scale. To say nothing of Dallas. All we've got like that is Westchester, and it's not the City, more a reservation for the terminally suburban.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    19. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by Adammil2000 · · Score: 1

      Matamoros is in Mexico you moron, not Texas.

    20. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Fuck you, Texas-licker. That border is purely for purposes of plausible denial, like "maquiladoras aren't Texan".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    21. Re:I believe it was Churchill who said... by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      "Years after the fall of communism"...

      So years after the fall of the Nazis we shoud forget the victims, and just move on with our happy lives? Well, the communists often were just as brutal and just as cruel as the Nazis, and finding and bringing the responsible to justice is important.

      You don't seem to know families who disappeared overnight that were taken in cattle box cars to Siberian labor camps and died there. And you probably don't know about the Orthodox Christian priests that were tortured to death in the KGB interogation chambers, with their limbs cut off, teeth pulled with pliers and needles stuck under their nails. We are not talking about mild abuses of power, or some minor annoyances, but mass murder, torture and terror. And what happened afterwards? -Well, you would appreciate this - nothing! Many of those executioners, labor camp guards and members of secret services (KGB) nicely covered their tracks, burnt the archives, and are living a nice, happy life right among the victims and families that they once destroyed.

      And I won't buy crap like "They just had to do it" or "That's how the times were." Some things are wrong no matter the times and the political regime.

      I only wish they would treat the KGB collaborators like US and UN treats ex-Nazi collaborators. I don't feel it is unjust when once in a while they still find a Nazi labor camp guard and deport him, even if they are 80 years old.

  21. Re:Woah, that can't be good by riqnevala · · Score: 1
    These guys are trained to be ghosts. We taught them to do it for christsakes.

    - Eugene Kittridge

    --
    love slashdot. populate it. use it. abuse it. hate it. kill it. miss it. stop following links, they only kill servers.
  22. Did you hear about the polish kamikaze? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    he completed 52 missions.

  23. Or you could both just RTFA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    to see that the list included many others besides spies.

  24. Presidential Debates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    At last we understand why Bush said "don't forget Poland". Obviously we've been outsourcing all our
    intelligence to them.

  25. 1989 by r84x · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It was only 16 years ago that Poland threw off communism with the first free elections in the former Soviet bloc. This list likely contains the names of people that did great harm to others (and also many unrelated people). To simply write offf the list as something that should be forgotten, as some have suggested, would be foolish. We as americans must still atone for injustices done to others during the civil rights era, and many europeans are still dealing with the spectres of war from sixty years ago. To "forget" something that happened as recently as sixteen years is foolish and unreasonable.

    --
    Karma: Can there be a void?

    .. -. - . .-. .-. --- -...

    1. Re:1989 by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was only 16 years ago that Poland threw off communism with the first free elections in the former Soviet bloc. This list likely contains the names of people that did great harm to others (and also many unrelated people). To simply write offf the list as something that should be forgotten, as some have suggested, would be foolish.

      It's not that simple. Surely this list contains the names of people that did great harm - but it also contains the names of people that were harmed. It's just a catalog of everyone who was in scope of the Polish secret service - either as an informer or just as someone who is being followed. It's a list of both the torturers and their victims and there is no easy way to distinguish betwenn both groups (you could be blackmailed or just tortured into being an informer). You could as well take a telephone directory - it would also probably include names from those who do the harm and those who suffer it.

    2. Re:1989 by dustmite · · Score: 1

      (How is that flamebait? It's true. Oh wait, it's "I don't like the message" moderation)

      Anyway, back to the topic, South Africa is another example, where most whites are still whining that "we should forget Apartheid", only 11 years after it ended.

    3. Re:1989 by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Reposting this post, by grozzie2 (698656):
      yes, and as americans, you are busy building up the list of things to atone for again. your children will the ones that ultimately have to pay retributions for what's happening now.
      Account moderated as "flamebait".
  26. Thank you Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thank you Slashdot! I'm from Poland and exactly here's the first time I'm reading about this. But I'm a bit worried also. My family name is very popular on the list.
    But seriously, most of you got the wrong idea about this thing. Of course it's not like we had 240,000 Bonds here. Those posts mentioning 'snitchers' ('denunciators' maybe) are closer to the real image.

    1. Re:Thank you Slashdot! by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thank you Slashdot! I'm from Poland and exactly here's the first time I'm reading about this. But I'm a bit worried also. My family name is very popular on the list.

      Well, your family name is also quite popular here on Slashdot. Stick around for a while and you will see many other Anonymous Cowards.

    2. Re:Thank you Slashdot! by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      What do you mean: "many other Anonymous Cowards"? Isn't there just one Anonymous Coward, who spends way too much time on /.? I think the guy is way too obsessed with posts here to ever sleep, and s(he) has many identities and worked almost anywhere - for sure a secret service spy!

  27. Similar by simgod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A similar incident happened in Slovenia a year ago, where an Australian (moved there after WW2) published the list of people who spied and people who were beeing watched by the Yugoslavian secret police UDBA.
    First the government tried to block access to the list's server, but soon all the people who were interested learned how to use a proxy connection. Their server was slashdotted for a month, becuse the idiot put the list in 800K jpg pictures and so the whole thing was something like 40 GB and difficult to search. After the initial "shock" in the media and public, a month after nobody, there was hardly any interest for the list anymore.

    1. Re:Similar by gihan_ripper · · Score: 5, Informative

      The name of the Slovenian emigre in question is Dusan Lajovic, and the database of Slovenian 'spies' can be found here.

      --
      Phoenix, Boston, Little Rock, see a pattern?
  28. This could be a great excuse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For certain people to blame p2p of supporting terrorism...

  29. Wildstein list Torrent by QuaZar666 · · Score: 3, Informative

    In case anyone wants to read the list you can get the torrent Here.

    - Qua

  30. wow by Bolshoy+Pimpovich · · Score: 1, Interesting
    being a Russian-speaking American of Polish/Czech descent, and growing up in a Polish naighborhood in a major American city... I can say that some form of every slovak last name I could think of from my neighborhood is on that list... they may have well posted a by-name roster of the population of eastern Europe... wtf...

    nothing to see here, move along

    --
    Ehta nyeh IBM, ehta Macintosh!
    1. Re:wow by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I can say that some form of every slovak last name I could think of from my neighborhood is on that list..

      You must mean Cleveland. Either Cleveland or Philly.

      This is not shocking.... There are about 10 million Poles in America. Chicago and New York are up on the list of Polish american cities with about 700,000 and 600,000 respectivly. In the past Cleveland was said to have the largest Polish population second only to Warsaw. I never checked if that was true.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    2. Re:wow by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Baltimore/DC area, actually.

      Damn, off by 100 miles (from philly that is). I have a brother you moved out that way.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  31. Polish joke about Starbucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can just imagine how it would sound in a movie: My name is Wolschansky, Vojzeh Wolschansky.

    Quite frankly, it's always a problem for me in Starbucks, when they ask me about me name to write it on my cup of latte. When I say my real name - there will always be a surprised "Voi... WHAT?" from the poor underpayed Starbucks employee and then some stupid conversation, while the rest of the queue wants to lynch me for the delay. I never know what to do - sometimes I choose a fake English name that sounds remotely like mine (Walter usually), sometimes I say "just W". I wonder how other fellow slashdotters from overseas solve this problem, especially those with weird names that are hard to prononuce and just plain impossible to transcribe in Latin characters.

    After all, Starbucks is just Starbucks, but just try to make a hotel reservation spelling your name to a hotel clerk...

    1. Re:Polish joke about Starbucks by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I can just imagine how it would sound in a movie: My name is Wolschansky, Vojzeh Wolschansky.

      There was an old police sitcom called Barney Miller with a character named Stan Wojciehowicz. When ever anyone asked how do you spell it he would simply say, "spell it like it sounds". But as you might imagine the character had the nickname Wojo.

      Going to school with kids who also had -ski /-sky sirnames also got abbrivated. I would imagine this person would get shortened to Wolsky and be happy with it.

      I wonder how other fellow slashdotters from overseas solve this problem

      I'm not from overseas and my name wasn't hard to convert to english. Just replace Z with dot above (stupid slashdot) with a Z and sometimes replace I with Y randomly. It's not hard to pronounce but no bugger knows how to spell it. The nickname Zuke became common among my family and others who share my sirname.

      Though I can't for example say "Z" because it will end up being C.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    2. Re:Polish joke about Starbucks by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Say "Zulu" (the international aviation alphabet word for "Z").

      This is America! You say Zulu they write Zulu or ask if you are from Africa. You say Zed which is also the standard in other English speaking countries they write Zed, Said, Ted or ask what's a Zed. I enjoy much better luck with Zebra as that is the standard kindergarten icon on the alphabet chart here.

      I agree that the international stanard for radio should be used for telephone but it's hardly useful if no one else uses it.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  32. stupid! by freeplatypus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    First of all, this is not technology related topic so I don't know why it is on /.

    The guy, Wildenstein, or whatever, is a complete moron. The list, which is currently being held by the IPN (the official government institution) is going to become public. I assume that some people, like active agents, won't be listed, otherwise this would be the highest possible stupidity.

    The Internet. There are few meaningless list on the internet, they differ in contents. You can't be sure which one is the proper one. After all, this is only the name index. Without cataloges (which are in posession of IPN) the list is useless, or in worst case, missleading.

    Cheers!

    1. Re:stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The guy, Wildenstein, or whatever, is a complete moron. The list, which is currently being held by the IPN (the official government institution) is going to become public. I assume that some people, like active agents, won't be listed, otherwise this would be the highest possible stupidity.

      Speaking about complete morons... There are no active agents of People's Republic of Poland since 1989. And "the guy" is named Wildstein, not "Wildenstein, or whatever" -- it's right there in the story (you know, that first big comment at the top, posted on the Slashdot front page...). Who on Earth has moderated it insightful???

    2. Re:stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The guy, Wildenstein, or whatever, is a complete moron.

      The real problem is, that the most influential polish newspaper - "Gazeta Wyborcza" - consequently tries to discredit any attempt to reveal facts concerning communist political police (BTW its chief redactor, Adam Michnik, has admitted drinking vodka on many occasions with Jerzy Urban, main propagandist of communist regime), and people like you blindly and passionately believe everything they read there.

    3. Re:stupid! by freeplatypus · · Score: 1

      I don' read "Wyborcza", oh no, this is becoming the newspaper about nothing (like e.g. "Fakt"). I like Rzeczpospolita... fortunatelly they fired Wildnstein'a.

    4. Re:stupid! by Bonhamme+Richard · · Score: 1
      First of all, this is not technology related topic so I don't know why it is on /.

      Slashdot: News for Nerds. Stuff that matters.

      This is list is:

      1) News for nerds. Hence the interest, and the 100+ postings.

      2) Something that matters. Especially if you live in Poland...

    5. Re:stupid! by freeplatypus · · Score: 1

      1) Ok, my fault.

      2) I live in Poland, and frankly speaking I have enough of this. Like there was nothing important in this country except pope and 'The List'.

  33. Why? Profit! by Nemesis242 · · Score: 4, Funny

    1 - Try enforcing Patents in EU
    2 - Be blocked by Polish vote
    3 - Pull your strings in the CIA
    4 - Dump Polish spy/snitch/etc names on P2P
    5 - Tell Polish officials next time will be worse
    6 - Try enforcing Patents in EU...again...
    7 - Have the Polish vote in favor
    8 - Profit!
    9 - BTW, accuse P2P of potential danger to US spies also
    10 - Have congress pass laws against anything P2P related
    11 - Profit! Again!

    PS: later on...

    12 - Prove that Windows is P2P because you can share folders and have others search them
    13 - Make Windows illegal
    14 - Prove that all other OS's suffer from the same
    15 - Ban OS's... ban computers... ban technology...
    16 - Go live in a cave
    17 - De-evolve
    18 - Become extinct
    19 - Earth Profits!!! ;-P

    1. Re:Why? Profit! by uits · · Score: 1

      19 steps on Slashdot!?!, if I'm too lazy to read the article, I'm not slogging through a 19 step program...

    2. Re:Why? Profit! by ceeam · · Score: 1

      I guess you may skip to step 17 immediately.

    3. Re:Why? Profit! by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      At least your conspiracy theories are well through out .... to the point of human extinction!! Guess that qualifies you as the next Nostradamus. When is the book being published?

    4. Re:Why? Profit! by khallow · · Score: 1
      When is the book being published?

      Hopefully I'll be extinct by then.

  34. I never make these lists... by ABeowulfCluster · · Score: 2, Funny

    :( Sigh.

  35. Some other facts... by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Mr. Wildstein, the journalist who stole the list, got fired. Now the journalist community boils about this apparent "limiting of free speech". (imo free speech is the right to reveal your own opinions, not stealing others' secrets)

    2. The problem with the list is that it contains hardly more info than just names. It is known to contain names of active agents, names of those who cooperated, and names of people, who were observed and potentially viable for "recruitment" even though the contact between the secret service and them never happened. All mixed together and not distinguished from each other in any readable way (just keycode(hash) used in others, non-leaked documents). So the presence on the list may mean trouble to many innocents, because paranoid employes, friends and such may suspect them even if they are not guilty of anything.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  36. That's not free speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "imo free speech is the right to reveal your own opinions, not stealing others' secrets"

    You present these two things as polar opposites, but that's a false choice.

    Free speech is not about just your own opinions, free speech is also about the truth.

    When the government does something bad, and evil, free speech means revealing the truth, not just saying "Well, in my opinion, something bad happened that we should talk about". Think "pentagon papers".

    Personally, I want a list of my fellow citizens who are willing to spy on each other. Any government that solicts its citzens to spy on each other, IMHO deserves to be changed. That's what this list is about.

    1. Re:That's not free speech by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      And what about people who the government just -used to think viable- for spying on others? Even if they weren't? In this case they are the victims.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:That's not free speech by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      Personally, I want a list of my fellow citizens who are willing to spy on each other. Any government that solicts its citzens to spy on each other, IMHO deserves to be changed. That's what this list is about.

      That isn't free speech either.

      You see, your right to free speech ends right when it infringes upon my right to privacy and if I as a spy want to keep that fact private for whatever reasons be they safety concerns and the like, then so be it.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  37. Re:Don't forget POLAND! by Allison+Geode · · Score: 1

    yeah, but the thing is, now, for Poland's national security, they'd rather be forgotten, thank you very much.

  38. The Polish Holocaust and Polish jokes. by mc6809e · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, they're funny, but try not to take it too far.

    The Polish have really had a hard time. There even was a "Polish holocaust". Seriously.

    Never heard of it?

    That's how successful it was.

    1. Re:The Polish Holocaust and Polish jokes. by mc6809e · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Some more facts about the Polish Holocaust":

      "During the period of the Holocaust of World War II, Poland lost:

      45% of her doctors,
      57% of her attorneys
      40% of her professors,
      30% of her technicians,
      more than 18% of her clergy
      most of her journalists. "

      [snip]
      "Non-Jews of Polish descent suffered over 100,000 deaths at Auschwitz. The Germans forcibly deported approximately 2,000,000 Polish Gentiles into slave labor for the Third Reich. The Russians deported almost 1,700,000 Polish non-Jews to Siberia. Men, women and children were forced from their homes with no warning. Transferred in cattle cars in freezing weather, many died on the way. Polish children who possessed Aryan-looking characteristics were wrenched from their mother's arms and placed in German homes to be raised as Germans. "

    2. Re:The Polish Holocaust and Polish jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      During the period of the Holocaust of World War II, Poland lost:

      98.5% of her Jews

      Over 6,000,000 Jews were murdered in Poland. More than half of them were Polish Jews.

    3. Re:The Polish Holocaust and Polish jokes. by MSBob · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Thank you. It is such a forgotten issue in the whole discussion about holocaust. While it's true that most of the Poles who died from German and Soviet hands weren't actually gassed doesn't mean they had it any better than the Jews. Most were actually starved to death while in forced labour. Hardly a better alternative to a gas chamber.

      There is no international medial voice equivalent to Steven Spielberg to highlight the horrors of holocaust. Conversely, the recent holocaust movie by Polanski ("The Pianist") skewed the picture of life outside the Warsaw ghetto. Watching that movie one may infer that life in nazi occupied Poland continued pretty much as before the war. That is blatently untrue. Listening to the accounts of old Warsovians, life in Warsaw was incredibly tough (food shortages, no heating fuel) coupled with constant persecution by Gestapo and of course snatching people from streets to send them to forced labour camps.

      Poland needs its own Steven Spielberg.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    4. Re:The Polish Holocaust and Polish jokes. by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anyone familiar with the history of the second world war should be aware that one of the goals of germans was the systematic extermination of polish intelligentsia. which they've done with a great zeal. the modern-days revisionists (those denying the holocaust alltogether) refer to this fact as 'some misunderstanding between the Germany and Poland'. unfortunately, not many people today are familiar with the history, in general.

    5. Re:The Polish Holocaust and Polish jokes. by AsZe · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness for people like you.

      I've been reading the news lately due to the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, and way too many newspapers worldwide either don't mention the non-Jewish victims at all, or - in fact - refer to the camp as a Polish concentration camp. It hurts a hell of a lot, when you're Polish, when you live near Oswiecim (Auschwitz), when you hear people say things like that, and know others will take it and believe it.

      My family had a few people in Auschwitz, and although as far as I know all of them survived it one way or another, hearing how Auschwitz was Jews-only, and made by the Poles, just makes it seem to me as if the Nazis won after all.

  39. This wouldn't have happened... by ion_ · · Score: 2, Funny

    This wouldn't have happened had the software patents been legal in EU:

    EP5506624: System and method for publishing information about a plurality of secret agents on an Internet compatible system

  40. Not a very complete & accurate list... by sznupi · · Score: 1

    It only contains names from one administrative province (out of almost 50 which existed back then (today their number is reduced significantly) - so you can imagine what would be the number on list that covers whole cuntry)...and on top of that it can't be trusted - right after release it was edited in uncontrolled way by internauts, who added many names, probably also deleted some... Oh, and this ISN'T the list of spies, this is the list of people who were of interest for the former regime, including also opposition for example.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
    1. Re:Not a very complete & accurate list... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Oh, and one more thing - it's hard to tell that this was leaked; it is completely public list (just that it wasn't put in the internet for easy acces, but if you wanted to see it before the "leak", you could)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  41. What the point is - for a typical /.-er by Eminence · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Now that's a surprise that this has made its way to Slashdot. The problem is that unless you are from one of the former soviet bloc countries you won't get it.

    Of course there are English native speakers who do get it - people like Norman Davies or Timothy Garton Ash, who studied the subject at length. Actually, if you want to understand just a bit of what it is all about read Timothy's book, The File. In that he describes how it all looked like in former East Germany, the only place where they have dealt with communist secret police and its informers in the proper way. Just one piece of information - one third of the population there was informing on the remaining two thirds. Let me repeat that again - out of three East-Germans one was an informer. Do you, dear Americans or British, can imagine at all what it was to live in a society like this? No? Just what I thought.

    And we have no real reason to believe that the proportions were significantly different in other soviet bloc countries. After all secret police in each of those countries was organized along the same good soviet guidelines and under careful, loving supervision by soviet KGB personnel. The only problem is that while in Germany and the Czech Republic they have got rid of the former informers and officers of these secret police organizations from the public life and allowed former victims to learn the (sometimes painful) truth about who informed on them - not in Poland. In Poland former communist officials run the government now and the former secret police officers and informers do very well, many of them forming now the business elite of the now supposedly free and democratic country. For years they have done an excellent job at preventing any attempts to actually reveal who was the scum and snitcher and who wasn't.

    But finally some of the data has spilled, the amount of interest shows clearly that people do care who was who and thanks to Internet, p2p networks and stuff no one can prevent this. And that's the point of having it up on Slashdot I guess.

    Which, BTW, shows that unless you start shooting people in the head with actual, real lead bullets (like in China) they will share whatever files they like and find worth it. Sorry MPAA, RIAA and any other AA out there. No matter how many lawsuits you will create you can't win. Unless you'll start shooting people. But that works only in China for now, and they don't care about copyrights anyway, sorry.

    1. Re:What the point is - for a typical /.-er by hughk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Many of those working for the Stasi were so-called Inoffiziale Mitarbeiters (unofficial workers). I don't know any IMs in Germany but a friend of mine who is Russian was an interpreter during the Moscow olympics. She was just supposed to look after a bus load of visitors and report on anything interesting to the KGB. She ended up just making up some rubbish which took the heat away from the KGB and wouldn't get anyone into trouble. I guess that when you cooerce people into being informers, many end up fabricating the product.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    2. Re:What the point is - for a typical /.-er by Beautyon · · Score: 1

      Thank you for this most interesting and useful post. What people should be VERY aware about now is that Marcus Wolf, the architect of the very system you describe, has just been employed by the Department of Homeland Security to set up a similar system in the USA.

      Only in the worst nightmares of the old cold warriors was such a system seen working in the continental USA, but here it is, being set up by Republicans.

      What is that buzzing?

      George Washington spinning in his grave at 1500rpm.

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
    3. Re:What the point is - for a typical /.-er by Eminence · · Score: 3, Informative

      She ended up just making up some rubbish which took the heat away from the KGB and wouldn't get anyone into trouble. I guess that when you cooerce people into being informers, many end up fabricating the product.

      I guess that if you believe what she said then you really don't get the way it work. You see KGB and their little brothers throughout "satellite countries" were not stupid. Ruthless, devoid of human feelings, totally immoral and sometimes corrupt - yes. Stupid - no. With informer penetration of one third of the society cross-checking the reports sounds like an easy thing to do. And it was frequently done. First, to ensure the system delivered real information. Second, to ensure that the informer would believe his handler (officer who recruited him and was overseeing him, meeting him - or her in the case of your Russian friend) knows everything anyway.

      Now, guess what would happen when someone going on that bus would do something strange, out of ordinary by soviet standards back then - like, say, ask this friend of yours what does she think about Chernenko (or whoever was running that place then) or the communism in general - do you think she would hesitate for a moment in reporting that to her KGB handler? Not one. And not because she is (or was) a particularly bad person, no, because she would be afraid, really scared, of what might happen to her if she didn't report that - but someone else did. Her handler has from day one worked hard on ensuring that this fear would be with her, always. They were very effective at putting fear into people's mind, the whole system was - some people in Poland were afraid to, say, sign a petition against government years after 1989.

      And while dealing with a secret police there is no such thing as an innocent report that for sure won't get anyone in trouble. Something that looks innocent to an informer might be the missing part of a bigger puzzle for an officer.

      The point is - despite all the horrors of the system by seventies and eighties it lost much of its bloodthirsty jaws it had in the Stalin era. And there was a choice, you didn't have to be informant if you didn't want to. You also didn't have to join the communist party. Sure, you had to accept though, that you won't advance in your career, won't get a new car and a flat to live in. And, in some cases, your little sins like cheating on your wife would be exposed. Or you would have to serve that one month prison term for drunk-driving. Or, in the case of your Russian friend, you wouldn't be allowed to do a lucrative and pleasant job of showing foreigners around at the Olympics. But at least you didn't become a part of the system that was destroying your own nation. That wasn't as brave as die on a barricade or something, but nevertheless that was bravery. And many, many people were that brave back then. The fact that those who weren't were not even named... is a shame.

    4. Re:What the point is - for a typical /.-er by Eminence · · Score: 1

      What people should be VERY aware about now is that Marcus Wolf, the architect of the very system you describe, has just been employed by the Department of Homeland Security to set up a similar system in the USA.

      I can't believe that, this is a real horror. But there is some hope, since the article you refer to contains an important factual error - Wolf was running the outside intelligence branch of Stasi. That too did some interesting bits, like training of various middle-eastern and south-American terrorists etc. but they were not responsible for the internal informers system. So this can hardly be his specialty, which the source of the article claims. Also, Primakov being ex-KGB (and there is no exactly such thing as an "ex" in that nice club) is not the best source of information. However, this is so scary that you should, if you are an American, probably do something about like write your congressman or something.

      BTW, hiring Primakov as an advisor would be an extremely stupid thing to do, because one can be sure that no matter how much you pay he will stay loyal to his pals from the nice building at Dzierzynski Square, Moscow and report there anything he has heard and saw.

    5. Re:What the point is - for a typical /.-er by hughk · · Score: 1

      I believe her. Accurate reporting on contacts and conversations amongst 40+ people is hard work. I think that rather than any special moral reason. Many people disliked the state but were kept afraid, but scaring somebody may force cooperation but possibly not of the best quality.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  42. '00', '0' by helfen · · Score: 1

    And remember that '00' means 'license to kill'

  43. Been there, done that. by bi_boy · · Score: 1

    It's equivalent to an American saying "I don't care if I put CIA/FBI agent's lives in danger".

    The Novak/Plame situation: http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/09/29/novak.ci a/

    --
    Chicken fried butter sticks? Do ... do you use a fork? - Black Mage, 8-Bit Theater
  44. Those Who Forget History Are Doomed to Repeat It by Zoop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now substitute "Nazi" or "Apartheid" or "Abu Ghraib" for "Communist", and see if you believe your own argument.

    The truth commission in South Africa is there for a reason. The "Communist Era" as you call it is not even as far back as World War Two--it only ended in 1989. There were atrocities committed. In much of Eastern Europe there has been insufficient lustration, and at the very least something like the Truth Commission would help deal with the lingering resentments people feel. If someone does something and seems to have gotten away with it, you are much more likely to bear a grudge than if they do something but are forced to come clean about it.

    Let's put it this way--if Guantanamo becomes a camp for political dissenters in the U.S. and you're an American, would you not want to know which of your neighbors were collaborating with the government to send people there? Wouldn't you want the stories out to provide a lesson so history isn't repeated?

    In Lithuania I met a Russian who had been in the KGB prison in Vilnius for 11 years. He took us on a tour of the prison and explained how they would be chained to the ground in unheated rooms (it was -20C outside during the tour), showing us a padded room (with blood-stained burlap still on the walls) where they beat people regularly and fired guns over their heads.

    There's a weird disconnect in the West that says that, because the goal was social justice, we should overlook the "excesses" of Communism and not regard their crimes the way Naziism or Apartheid or the genocide in Rwanda is regarded. I think it's this willing amnesia that is at the heart of the problem--we can avoid the messy questions that someone in South Africa or Rwanda has to live with on a daily basis if we all pretend it was a gigantic comedy of errors or a period of simply unskillful government.

    The same lack of memory, incidentally, can be said for the South's attitude toward the civil rights struggle in the United States, though at least some criminals are being prosecuted--but hardly enough.

    How can we argue that the rest of the world should follow our enlightened example if we're unwilling to look carefully at our own past?

  45. Re:WAY TO GO /. by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
    I would hope so.

    I mean, it's not like there's any double standards on Slashdot, right?

    --

    Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  46. misread by psp · · Score: 1

    Oh, I thought it was "Pics of Posh Spice Leaked On The Internet".

    That would have been interesting...

  47. sex ? by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    Are there still people looking for porn by googling to "sex" ?

  48. wrong by abulafia · · Score: 1
    Stab any evil institution in the heart and what spills out? People.

    What better way to make sure evil institutions don't rebuild? Punish the people involved.

    --
    I forget what 8 was for.
  49. Re:Those Who Forget History Are Doomed to Repeat I by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

    I think you're missing the point: it's not about the ideology, it's about the people following it; more specifically, to what level and what degree.

    A bit of perspective here: my father's family are Russian and Lithuanian Jews, and a good 2/3 of them simply vanished in the Holocaust. I'm very glad that the Allies after the war prosecuted the top Nazis, and that later, they and other countries (particularly Israel, for obvious reasons) put a great deal of time and effort into tracking down the ones who escaped. But -- and I don't think I'm alone in this -- the last few prosecutions made me acutely uncomfortable. I really don't see the point in tracking down old men who were brainwashed teenagers then and putting them on trial for something that took place more than half a lifetime ago. Presumably there are a fair number of them still alive, and you know what? I don't care. It's over. Let it go.

    BTW, I'm also a Desert Storm vet, and I'm as shocked and horrified as anyone at what happened at Abu Ghraib. But what pisses me off is the whitewash, where they hang a few enlisted grunts out to dry, and the officers and senior NCO's, who IMNSGDHO had to not only know what was going on, but in fact explicitly encourage it, get off without even a black mark in the personnel files. I also believe quite strongly that the appropriate investigations and prosecutions should take place quickly; five or ten years would be much too late. "Justice delayed is justice denied." And if we can't get it done in a reasonable time, then it will be necessary, however distasteful we may find this necessity, to let it go.

    The analogy here should be obvious. By all means, prosecute the top people for the crimes of the Polish Communist regime, which were indeed many and terrible. But the low-level informants, the ones who took a few extra zlotys for passing on a name or a photo? For God's sake, people, it's over. Let it go.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  50. Silly Poles by mpest · · Score: 1

    The ironing is delicious

  51. Upper Manhattan? by Killio · · Score: 1

    Harlem, you must know, is predominately African-American. Some of the residents must own their own apartments.

    Furthermore, what do you mean "impossible?"

  52. Re:Free(not as in free beer)dom of speech by incal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    :) Of course I am. Jerzy Urban is a Jew. If I defend a Jew, that makes me a filthy antisemite. Perfect logic.

  53. Woah ... ! by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

    I find your ideas intriguing, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

  54. Re:Those Who Forget History Are Doomed to Repeat I by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    what pisses me off is the whitewash, where they hang a few enlisted grunts out to dry, and the officers and senior NCO's, who IMNSGDHO had to not only know what was going on, but in fact explicitly encourage it, get off without even a black mark in the personnel files

    What must be particularly galling is that the man ultimately responsible was re-elected. Further, he picked the guy who wrote the legal justification for torture as our new Attorney General. It's important to remember that while Bush didn't give a direct order to torture, he gave his tacit approval. He even insisted that Rummy stay on, after Rumsfeld twice tried to resign over the scandal. Rumsfeld, in public on the other hand, justified Abu Ghraib by saying that the actions of the terrorists were worse.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  55. Re:Those Who Forget History Are Doomed to Repeat I by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

    That's not what happened.

    Oh, really? How many officers or senior NCO's have been court-martialed, or even Article 15'ed, over what happened at Abu Ghraib? Do you think that any will be, ever?

    Okay, maybe "without even a black mark" was an exaggeration -- I'm sure there were some reprimands. But if we're sending junior enlisted to prison, those in the chain of command above them, who knew what was happening and almost certainly ordered them to do it, should pay at least an equal penalty

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  56. Re:Those Who Forget History Are Doomed to Repeat I by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

    Yes. Even without all the other shit we're doing over there, that alone pretty much guarantees generations more of hatred and terror.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  57. In other news... by serutan · · Score: 1

    Poland has at least 240,000 secret agents, and those are just ones we know about! Dang, that's more than half of one percent of their population!

  58. Re:Those Who Forget History Are Doomed to Repeat I by toiletmonster · · Score: 1

    i agree with both you and the grand parent poster.

  59. Tell everyone! by TekMonkey · · Score: 1

    Well thank God the media informed everyone of this leak and where to get the information...

    "Jim is a spy?! He told me he was a doorknob salesman!"

  60. Agent 007? by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiousity, who did they list in spot #007?

    "James Bondokovski"?

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
    1. Re:Agent 007? by AsZe · · Score: 1

      Heh... Well, contrary to popular opinion, the letter V doesn't exist in the Polish language. It would've been Bondokowski. And a different name. There isn't any number 007, either, since all the numbers are file numbers, which means they're long, and have letters. Too bad slashdot said the list contains spies. Most of them weren't spies, but either snitches, or victims, or completely innocents either way.

  61. Who the ignorant one? by MMaestro · · Score: 1
    There's a weird disconnect in the West that says that, because the goal was social justice, we should overlook the "excesses" of Communism and not regard their crimes the way Naziism or Apartheid or the genocide in Rwanda is regarded. I think it's this willing amnesia that is at the heart of the problem--we can avoid the messy questions that someone in South Africa or Rwanda has to live with on a daily basis if we all pretend it was a gigantic comedy of errors or a period of simply unskillful government.

    I'm not saying the U.S. is perfect when it comes to foreign affairs (far from it), but why is it that whenever theres an international crisis whether its genocide, terrorism or humanitarian crimes; why does everyone always yell at the U.S. or the 'West' for ignoring these actions? Why can't the 'East' such as Russia, Japan or China deal with these issues instead of bitching when the U.S. is SENT to deal with the issue (North Korea's nuclear weapons? India and Pakistan? Maybe stretch over and deal with Iran?)

  62. Forgot by jlefeld · · Score: 1

    You forgot Poland!

  63. Not even the list of "snitches".... by JayZeus · · Score: 1

    Actually as it turns out, the list is not even the list of "snitches", "spies", or "(would be)informants", but actually a list of *all* workers that had to do anything with the goverment in those times. For example some family members or friends' family got on it, because one was a secretary at some government office, or other which was a police officer in the 50s. You just have to understand that back in those times, if you had a job like that, you *were* with them, or you'd be arrested, or at least questioned... Just FYI.

  64. enjoy yourselves... by tasinet · · Score: 1

    IPN BU 001198/2009 BONDAR JAN
    IPN BU 0194/3298 BONDAR WODZIMIERZ
    IPN BU 0604/2022 BONDAR WODZIMIERZ-BOHDAN
    IPN BU 00328/1496 BONDARA GRZEGORZ
    IPN BU 001134/2463 BONDARA GRZEGORZ
    IPN BU 0193/1219 BONDARCZUK FRANCISZEK
    IPN BU 00945/545 BONDARCZUK HENRYK
    IPN BU 001134/2286 BONDARENKO MIROSAW
    IPN BU 00612/3508 BONDAREW JANUSZ
    IPN BU 001198/6503 BONDAREW JANUSZ
    IPN BU 002081/288 BONDAREWICZ ANNA
    IPN BU 002085/354 BONDAREWICZ ANNA DOROTA
    IPN BU 001121/255 BONDAREWSKI BOGDAN
    IPN BU 0854/1102 BONDARUK KONSTANTY
    IPN BU 0218/1937 BONDARUK STEFAN
    IPN BU 0772/2266 BONDARYK HENRYKA
    IPN BU 001134/4208 BONDER BARBARA HELENA
    IPN BU 0988/27 BONDER CZESAW
    IPN BU 0806/1819 BONDER EMIL
    IPN BU 093/6 BONDER HELENA
    IPN BU 00399/115 BONDER HELENA
    IPN BU 0242/2845 BONDER KRZYSZTOF ANDRZEJ
    IPN BU 0242/1140 BONDER RYSZARD
    IPN BU 00257/376 BONDER RYSZARD
    IPN BU 001102/1443 BONDER RYSZARD
    IPN BU 01000/1807 BONDERSKA IRENA
    IPN BU 0855/2319 BONDOS WADYSAW
    IPN BU 52/70 BONDYRA EDWARD
    IPN BU 02042/550 BONDYRA JERZY
    IPN BU PF 970/203 BONDYRA JOLANTA
    IPN BU 0988/1161 BONDYRA ZOFIA

  65. 240,000 willing plebes .. by torpor · · Score: 1

    .. the most interesting part of this story to me is not that there's a "leaked list of polish spies" on the internet, it is the fact that there are 240,000 people out there willing to live covert and dishonest lives 'in the name of something'.

    how many 'spies' are there in the american homelands? will we ever know? just yesterday i had a drink with someone i suspected, pretty much within 5 minutes, of being a CIA agent .. and what do you know, they were ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  66. This list is a load of crap. Here's why by MSBob · · Score: 2, Interesting
    One of my uncles is definitely on that list. Now, I know for a fact that it is him because of his pretty uncommon first name and his very uncommon last name. There are very, very few Poles who bear his last name...

    Anyway, my point is, in the '80s he was actually on the other side of the fence, working for the opposition. In 1981 when the communist government introduced the martial law and outlawed Solidarity which was quickly followed by massive detentions he was one of those detained. I remember it well as my mother came home crying that her brother was snatched by WRON (the martial law enforcement agency formed after instituting the martial law) in the middle of the night and detained god knows where. He was released a few weeks later after being forced to sign some shit declaring that he would not work to subvert the communist government ever again. This is most likely why he's on the Wildstein list.

    Of course, right after his release it was business as usual for him: printing Solidarity leaflets, distributing Solidarity news magazines and smuggling letters from the loved ones out of the detention centers.

    I'm quite angry this list has surfaced as it tarnishes my uncle's name who actually fought the regime and risked his safety numerous times in defending the cause (and no he was not an informant or a double agent).

    I just hope this list isn't taken too seriously and does not lead to a witch hunt of sorts because a lot of innocent people will be harmed (though my uncle is "safe" in this respect: he died of a stroke about ten years ago).

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    1. Re:This list is a load of crap. Here's why by MaDeR · · Score: 1

      Of course - WILL be witch hunt. In Poland are many son of bitches, whom be welcome to take advantage of this list (after adding some names, of course). Wildsteim is complete idiot. He want that everyone know? Well, he got it: any spy, any co-operator, any Pole whom was prosecuted by Communist goverment is on list. And of course they will be marked as spies and murders and such. On pl.soc.polityka (political disscusion gropup in poland) is living hell now. This is what Wildstein want? "Stupid bastard" is too nice for him.

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
  67. Cowboy Neal? by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    Can somebody check if Cowboy Neal (not sure how it will be in in polish) is there?

  68. Not only Communists... by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 1
    > It was a specialty of communists, to put ideology above individual human beings.
    > "Masses are everything, one person means nothing" -- an old communist motto.

    "Kill them all. Let God sort them out."

    Many groups have put ideology above individual human beings. Saying "it's Communist!!" is both incorrect and unnecessary - the Cold War is over now, you know, and Communism is no longer the Big Scary Enemy. (It may or may not be bad, but it's no longer reasonable to have knee-jerk reactions about it - that's so 80's...)

    1. Re:Not only Communists... by RWerp · · Score: 1

      I invite you to visit Eastern Europe, where I live, and see for yourself how people are still trying to atone for the damage.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
  69. Oh by rofthorax · · Score: 1

    so this is how the polish coders came out in second place on the world programming challenge..

    I was wondering how that happened..

    It doesn't suprise me that india was in 67th place, india is great for outsourcing COBOL code, however
    I challenge you to obtain the source code from those you outsourced to.. Hahahaha vendor-lockin!!

    --
    Just say no to license servers!!
  70. Re:Those Who Forget History Are Doomed to Repeat I by Zoop · · Score: 1

    But the low-level informants, the ones who took a few extra zlotys for passing on a name or a photo? For God's sake, people, it's over. Let it go.

    Except the camp guards and Nazi party members who participated in any way in the Holocaust were indeed prosecuted, no matter how low their involvement was. Remember all the cases of American residents being deported for trial in Israel? Demianiuk (sp.?) for example?

    They may be low level, but it's that kind of passing the buck "I vas just following ordahs!" that permits these crimes to take place. That used to be a key understanding of the Holocaust, but it seems increasingly lost.

    Yes, Rumsfeld should at a minimum resign in disgrace, but Lynndie England had a responsibility to refuse illegal orders that she abandoned with relish. I don't let her or the informants off just because they weren't Jaruzelski or Rumsfeld.

  71. Why is this of worry? by suman28 · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that spies always used fake names anyway. No one is as flagrant or foolish as James Bond, even though we all love him.

    1. Re:Why is this of worry? by AsZe · · Score: 1

      Well, actually - my great uncle happened to use his real name in all his 'professional' work (ie, fighting Nazis and Communists), but went by a pseudonym as far as regular living was concerned.

      Besides - fake names weren't always quite used the way you mean, either. It would be more like, say, Jan Kowalski, pseudonim 'Wilczek', where Kowalski would be his real name, but for spy stuff, he'd go by just Wilczek [little wolf] - thus he'd still appear on the list as Jan Kowalski.

      So in fact - the real list does contain an abundance of correct names. It's just that we don't know who was bad, who was good, the list has been changed 100 times over, and there's always a chance that the name you found actually belongs to somebody else...

  72. Leonhard Euler and Polish jokes. by Anarcho-Goth · · Score: 1

    Not quite as serious, but all computer geeks should appreciate the Polish mathematician Leonhard Euler, and therefore should not put up with stupid Polish jokes.

    --
    I hate Liberals and Conservatives.
    If you are a Liberal or a Conservative, then HAVE A NICE DAY!
    Courage.
  73. Re:NOC NOC by fm6 · · Score: 1

    NAKity NAK. (Don't talk back.)

  74. Just a bunch of opinion from sombody in Poland... by AsZe · · Score: 1

    Well, I live in Poland, and the fact of the matter is I don't really get people. Take my case, for example. My surname doesn't appear on the list at all, nor does my Mom's maiden name, but I happen to have had a family member who was very, very high on the list of people who were seriously against the Communistic regime and were definitely not to be trusted by the regime. Over the war, he was among those who fought a Maquis-type battle in Poland against the Nazis. Now, this man, my great uncle if I'm correct, had adopted a different surname to use in Poland (since his real name - same as mine - was recognized everywhere due to his actions). I searched Wildstein's List for it figuring that he should've had a file. Indeed, there are ten names that could be him - same first name, same surname. But how can I be sure that any of these are actually him? See, the thing is, there's 240000 people on that list. That's a lot, yes. But if you happen to notice the name of a person you know, it doesn't mean nothing. Because there's 40 million people in the country, and probably another 5-10 million people who either aren't alive anymore, or live outside of the country. That's a whole lot more. The chances that the person you saw on the list is the person you know are perhaps big, but they're far from being even near 100%. That said, there's also the whole bad guy versus good guy thing, cos both guys had their own files, and the original coding system of said files (which apparently shows who was which) isn't included with the list. So seeing a familiar name doesn't even mean anything, because - even if it IS the person you're thinking about - they might've just as well been good and gotten written up for that. They might've been snitched on by someone else and ended up there. They might've been forced to work for the Communists in some capacity so the Communists wouldn't figure out what they really did - and that happened a whole lot too. For that matter, their only crime might've been their profession. Journalists, for instance, or policemen, or clergymen, or nuclear physicists... the list goes on and on. Not to mention there isn't any version of the list that one can be 100% sure of. Not one that's available to the public, anyway, since everyone who has access to the file can change it over any which way they want, then post it on their own site. In effect, the list means nothing at all. Well, almost nothing. It does show how very much the population of this country needs to find out the truth, because everyone is still so unsure of everything that happened in those years back then. That it's more important than pornographical sites says it all. Personally, I'm not sure what to think of it. It's good that it's been released, I think - since it should make for a good stepping stone for finally releasing the truth (up to now, as far as I know, the only way to find out if you had a file, was to go to Warsaw personally - and not many people can afford the money, or time, to do that). But it's put madness into the society, because few people realize that having your name on that list means, in fact, little to nothing. Unless of course you have a very rare surname. Like mine. My family has nothing to fear, apparently.

  75. Ooops! by AsZe · · Score: 1

    Darn, I didn't know I should add br's into that. First time post and all that, and I can't figure out how to change it... Sorry!