Slashdot Mirror


Fallout From Japanese Patent On Help Icon

MeridianOnTheLake writes "The Tokyo District Court has ordered the destruction of Ichitaro, a software product that is the only serious competitor in Japan to Microsoft Word, and has been on sale since 1985. The ruling is based on the claim of a competitor, Matsushita, that the use of a help icon to invoke a help function infinges on one of their patents. "We are a global enterprise and we are just following international practice to enforce our IP rights," Kitadeya (Matsushita) said." Here's more on the story, as covered by Bloomberg and The Japan Times.

372 comments

  1. Obvious Question by fembots · · Score: 3, Informative

    How about Microsoft? Is it too big to sue?

    A surprising thing is Justsystem shares fell 3 yen, or 0.5 percent, to 600 yesterday - As if nothing happened?

    1. Re:Obvious Question by blackomegax · · Score: 2, Informative

      thats still roughly SIX DOLLARS. i wonder how openoffice is viewed...

    2. Re:Obvious Question by forceflow2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      3 Japanese Yen is roughly 3 American cents...

    3. Re:Obvious Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      thus 600 is roughly 6 dollars. get his point? its a CHEAP SHARE :p

    4. Re:Obvious Question by forceflow2 · · Score: 2

      Ah, thought he was referencing the 3 yen, my mistake.

    5. Re:Obvious Question by Suhas · · Score: 1

      Now that's a first on slashdot

    6. Re:Obvious Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just announced instantly that it would appeal the decision. It mailed out messages to everyone on its registered user lists saying not to worry, Ichitaro and Hanako 2005 would come out as planned.

      In the week since then it's been looking into a patch that would zap the offending icon in the apps, keeping the help functionality there. I don't think anyone seriously believes this suit has a chance of squashing these products.

    7. Re:Obvious Question by orcrist · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Nah, people admitting they're mistaken are usually modded redundant or offtopic so you don't see those posts ;-)

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    8. Re:Obvious Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gues you just proved your argument by getting modded offtopic. Don't worry, I will watch out for you the next time I have mod points.

  2. Where have I seen that before? by Mr2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Matsushita declined to say whether it thinks any other software vendors may be infringing its patent.

    Gee, do you think there might be any other software out there that uses a help icon? *cough* *coughwindowsmacoswordexcelaccesspowerpointwordper fect--* *sputter* *choke*

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  3. Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Kymermosst · · Score: 3, Funny

    If only someone would sue Microsoft for Clippy, we could finally be rid of the biggest annoyance in Microsoft Office.

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Clippy may be liable under EPA guidelines, as it certainly pollutes desktops.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not with Chimpy McFlightsuit in the white house he ain't.

    3. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Maestro4k · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If only someone would sue Microsoft for Clippy, we could finally be rid of the biggest annoyance in Microsoft Office.
      • Personally I think the biggest annoyance by far in Microsoft Office is it's inability to open older versions of it's own .doc format properly, and the fact that Microsoft seems to make sure the current version of the .doc format won't work in older versions nearly every release. Meanwhile you have Wordperfect's .wpd format that hasn't changed since version 6 and works just fine.
      • It's pretty sad when software can't even handle it's own proprietary format properly.

    4. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Close, but you fall short.

      The biggest anoyance is that it's not using a standard format for those files. If it were, not only would you have compatability within the product family; but with other families (Adobe, F/OSS, etc) as well.

    5. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Maestro4k · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The biggest anoyance is that it's not using a standard format for those files. If it were, not only would you have compatability within the product family; but with other families (Adobe, F/OSS, etc) as well.
      • That's the ideal yes, but at a minimum it should be able to handle it's own proprietary format proprely, something MS Word fails to do. Even if it tried to use open formats, it'd probably screw them up so badly it couldn't open them up properly itself, much less anything else handle them.
      • Frankly I believe Open Office handles older versions of .doc formats better than the current MS Word does.

        Note: I'm not just MS bashing, I use Word a lot myself, and this is a very frustrating bug to deal with. It gets old having to upgrade every time a new version comes out (gotta make sure I can read all the Word documents that come my way), and having to keep older versions around on a backup machine for when the current version opens an older version .doc and it's unreadable without a few hours of formatting.

    6. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I actually hold the patent for Clippy but I'm too ashamed to sue anybody.

    7. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but when was the last time anybody got sued for crimes against humanity?

    8. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by foksoft · · Score: 1

      You don't need to use different versions of M$ products to generate incompatible documents. Guys at M$ in their internalization effort translated Visual Basic too. It is nice to write any macro and then to try run it in translated version of Excel and vice versa.

    9. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest annoyance in my mind is that it hasn't taught people when to use "its" versus "it's".

    10. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by nazsco · · Score: 1

      Can't they use the same law that forced Camel to remove their cartoonish character character?
      Clippy is a serious treat to make childrens found of microsoft office!

    11. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1
      If it's really critical that you be able to handle all Word documents properly, the only way I know of to do it, short of keeping a dozen PC's around with different versions of Word on each, is to use a Mac. There's a Mac program called Maclink Plus that will translate from any version of Word to any other, as well as between most other word processing formats. On several occasions when I was in college, someone who started a paper in a computer lab and then had to use it in a dorm PC, or vice versa, couldn't get it to work (even if they'd "saved as" an older version when going from newer to older machines), so they'd come to use my Mac to translate from one PC Word format to another on their PC floppy disk.

      This happened again when I went out and got a job. The company was all Windows based, but we were still using NT in 2001, and we would frequently be emailed Office attachments in newer versions of Office we couldn't use. I'd have to forward the attachment to myself at home, go home for lunch and translate it on my Mac, then email it back to myself at work.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    12. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by rben · · Score: 1

      The biggest anoyance is that it's not using a standard format for those files. If it were, not only would you have compatability within the product family; but with other families (Adobe, F/OSS, etc) as well.

      ...this is a very frustrating bug to deal with.

      This isn't a bug, this is a marketing feature. Microsoft did this on purpose in order to force companies to upgrade their software.

      --

      -All that is gold does not glitter - Tolkien
      www.ra

    13. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by sideshow+Pablo · · Score: 3, Funny
      NO!

      Microsoft didn't take clippy far enough. He should have been intergrated in the OS itself. Users would have to ask clippy for permission to run any applications.

      blink-blink

      "It appears your trying to run an open source program. I know your not a commie so I'll just go ahead and remove that for you."

    14. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Alsee · · Score: 1

      In Capitalist America Clippy holds the patent on YOU!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    15. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Mod parent "informative" - this one is hilarious - I didn't know about that. Now I think about all the VBScript apps I wrote for my last employer, and wonder.

    16. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by geekboy642 · · Score: 0

      Well, if Clippy was actually attractive to the childrens, the law thing might work...
      As is, I've seen small children running from the computers at the library in TERROR, just from the 'Tap-Tap-Beeroioioingggg!' sound that Clippy makes.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    17. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

      you fail, horribly

    18. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Hitmouse · · Score: 1

      Word's format hasn't changed since Word 97 (ditto, Excel, Powerpoint) which is 3 releases ago. Earlier versions of the format are either opened/imported directly or you can download text converters from Microsoft.

  4. It's not the thing, it's the method by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Ichitaro would have just used the standard Microsoft (that's the software platform they target) context-sensitive help, none of this would be an issue.

    Instead, they hired on an ex-Matsushita employee and he went on to use the Matsushita patented method for the help system. So they sued, as is their right.

    This is not a problem with the patent system. However what it does bring up is "How much knowledge can you take away from your previous employer, even if all that knowledge is just in your head?" As we gain ground in technology, such to the point that Johnny Bnemonic-style memory expansion is possible, how can patent holders and companies owning "trade secret" IP be protected from information pirates?

    1. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...how can patent holders and companies owning "trade secret" IP be protected from information pirates?
      They can't.

      That is why this is a problem with the patent system.

    2. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by oliverthered · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More to the point, as more and more of the things in the world become patented how are we to protect the people from the patent holders.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If Ichitaro would have just used the standard Microsoft (that's the software platform they target) context-sensitive help, none of this would be an issue.

      It seems a little too convenient that the company being sued is Microsoft's only serious competitor.

      Does anyone else smell the hand of Bill Gates, or is it just me?

    4. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by scriptie+the+kid · · Score: 1
      "As we gain ground in technology, such to the point that Johnny Bnemonic-style memory expansion is possible, how can patent holders and companies owning "trade secret" IP be protected from information pirates?"

      Corporate assasins armed with laser whippy light saber thingies maybe? That or we could always just kill off all the dolphins.

      --
      I for one welcome our new vengeful sith overlords.
    5. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Brandybuck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hate to be the one to defend software patents, because I really despise them, but in this case, as in most others, it's the infringing company that's getting hurt, and not "the people".

      p.s. Of course, the people are getting hurt indirectly, as they are thus deprived of a choice in the marketplace.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    6. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by jd · · Score: 5, Interesting
      IIRC, it depends a lot on how obvious the method is (you're not supposed to be able to patent things that are trivial), whether the solution is in the public domain (you can't patent public knowledge) and when the patent was filed with respect to the alledged copy.


      It also depends some on the reason why the patent infringement is coming up now. For example, since the company affected is a competitor to Microsoft, did Microsoft pay Matsushita to launch the lawsuit? IANAL, but there may be a case for appeal, if it turns out that the lawsuit was in bad faith, and/or is an attempt by Microsoft to gain further control of the Japanese office market by paying Matsushita to eliminate the only serious competitor.


      In general, the courts tend to frown on being used subversively as the "enforcers" of a protection racket.


      I'm not saying that this is what is happening. What I am saying is that there are enough suspicious circumstances to warrant a closer look at this, and that the Japanese courts might be persuadable that this isn't as innocent as it appears.


      As for the "what you know" problem - since any work "could" be tainted by any prior experience, it would be impossible for any technical person to be re-hired within the lifetime of any patent they may have come into contact with. AT&T argued a similar line, against the BSDers, arguing that since they'd come into contact with AT&T proprietary knowledge, they were tainted and therefore so was any/all their subsequent work.


      This is one reason I don't agree with the existing concept of IP. Nobody could ever have more than one job, and once they quit/leave/get sacked, they could NEVER be re-employed. IMHO, that is not protecting anybody and is clearly excessive.


      Therefore, it should not be possible to "taint" work with IP, merely by being exposed to it. There has to be a far more material breach, and one which isn't protected against IP claims in some other way (such as being obvious, public domain, etc).

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    7. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Does anyone else smell the hand of Bill Gates, or is it just me?

      If you wish to spend the weekend smelling the hand of Bill Gates that is up to you. But you don't need to share it with all of us ;)

    8. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Maestro4k · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I hate to be the one to defend software patents, because I really despise them, but in this case, as in most others, it's the infringing company that's getting hurt, and not "the people".

      p.s. Of course, the people are getting hurt indirectly, as they are thus deprived of a choice in the marketplace.

      • So ultimately software patents screw over the public no matter what. While Matsushita may be in the right here, software patents are what created the mess and the public still loses. Just even more proof that software patents are bad ideas.
    9. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      It seems like every user of that software is being hurt. Imaging training on a piece of software since '85 only to have it discontinued.

      Feels like when Exluna killed BMRT thanks to Pixar IP concerns. It sucked. Thousands of my man hours went to waste.

    10. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is not a problem with the patent system. However what it does bring up is "How much knowledge can you take away from your previous employer, even if all that knowledge is just in your head?" As we gain ground in technology, such to the point that Johnny Bnemonic-style memory expansion is possible, how can patent holders and companies owning "trade secret" IP be protected from information pirates?"

      why is this interesting? can you actually type with a straight face that "a help button that activates a help menu" is either a tradesecret or a valid patent?

      while i agree that ip theft is interesting in that it doesn't require physical theft. your question is only interesting in this context because of how stupid said patent is.

    11. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by shanen · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Gee, the whole topic makes me nostalgic. I was a pretty heavy user of Ichitaro many years ago. I think I started with Version 3, and I definitely remembering having Version 6 on a machine around 1995. However Word was already becoming pretty dominant in the market by then, and I really don't think they would care enough about JustSystems as competition to get involved in this. I think it's just sort of law of the jungle stuff ("jyaku niku kyo shoku" (weak meat strong eat) in Japanese), and probably with some revenge for seasoning. The guy in my office says they're going to appeal, so it's not yet over--but almost.

      Not sure if anyone interested in the trivia, but here's a bit just in case... The old Ichitaro actually had a lot of elements copied from ancient WordStar, but the interface got pretty much tortured to death when they were trying to add a Windows-style menu system. I'm pretty sure some versions had both interfaces. They had originally been almost completely dominant in the software word processor market, but that was back when NEC had the lock on proprietary Japanese hardware. Their foundation was their Japanese input system, which was still better than Microsoft's for many years. That was called ATOK, and was also sold separately for use as an IME replacement. They tried to expand into integrated office suites about the same time Lotus was getting beaten out of that market. Later on they tried to become an ISP with a system called JustNet, but I think they eventually sold it to someone else. (But I did see a few of their boxes in a large computer store just this weekend, when I was visiting Akihabara.)

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    12. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by flyingsquid · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Does anyone else smell the hand of Bill Gates, or is it just me?

      Man, Bill Gates is to Slashdotters what Satan is to the evangelicals- this all powerful, ubiquitous incarnation of darkness, whom all evil acts in the world can be blamed on.

      I mean, I'm not saying I disagree with that viewpoint or anything...

    13. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by sharok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In all honesty, given that His Billness's OS is on at least 90% of personal computers in the world, it follows that 90% of whatever happens can be traced back to him, either by intent or by chance.

    14. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is not a problem with the patent system.

      This is a problem with the patent system, for two reasons:

      1. A patent should not be granted unless the idea being patented is not obvious. Having a standardised icon to invoke help is obvious.
      2. A patent should not be granted unless the idea being patented is novel. I don't know when the alleged Matsushita patent was granted, but I was using an icon (a bitmap representation of a question mark, but hey - it may not be pretty but it's an icon) in 1986, and I know I wasn't the first - I'm pretty sure the Xerox STAR office software had a similar system, because that's where I think I filched it from.
      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    15. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by KontinMonet · · Score: 1

      ...you're not supposed to be able to patent things that are trivial...

      Like ISNOT (20040230959) or the peanut butter and jelly sandwich (6004596) or the snowman accessory kit (D382317)?

      IIRC, the Japanese patent system is even more broken than the US system. So, clicking on a question mark to get help being patented doesn't surprise me.

      --
      Did he inhale?
    16. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Man, Bill Gates is to Slashdotters what Satan is to the evangelicals- this all powerful, ubiquitous incarnation of darkness, whom all evil acts in the world can be blamed on.

      Well, I'm not going to make any wild accusations or anything... but tell me, has anyone ever actually seen Satan and Bill Gates in the same room?

    17. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by NoMercy · · Score: 1

      I totaly agree, *goes back to thinking of uses for icons people havn't used them for yet and patenting them*

    18. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      come to think of it, I've never seen Satan and an AC in the same room...

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    19. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by HanB · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It would be acceptable if the court could order the help function to be replaced. But ordering the whole product to be destroyed is the real power of patents in the hands of big companies.

      Admitted, a small company can sue a big company and make a lot of bucks from it, but a big company can handle that. On the other hand a big company can crush it's compatitors.

      In this case it's even worse, a big company orders a small company to do the dirty work for them.

      I bet they threatened them with a patent-lawsuit.

    20. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Viceice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thats why I strongly believe that abstract ideas and concepts should NOT be patentable.

      Allowing a method to do something be patentable is absolutely stupid. Can you imagine if the doctor who developed organ transplant surgery patented all his findings and demanded huge royalties each time a transplant was carried out?

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    21. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      1: I would expect that the help system it good, so by preventing it from being in other products you make those products artificially worse than they could be.

      This hurts 'The People'

      2: Some guy has just been working for one company, and probably put a lot of effort into the help system. He them moves to another company and because this great idea is still in his head he implements it there too. Opps, patent infringement, that hurts 'the people' because they cannot do what they think, though police by proxy.

      3: So during the time the guy way implementing the help system at the new company his old company were lazy and couldn't be bothered to improve the system they were using.
      This hurts the 'people'

      If his old company was so lazy as to not innovate further then fuck em, lazy fucks stop claiming benefits from 'old technologies' and do some real work.

      Anyhow, the 'company' didn't invent anything, the people who work for the company did and if anything they should be the only ones allowed to protect their work.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    22. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by cortana · · Score: 1

      I think this *is* a problem with the patent system. Although the article doesn't go in to much details, it sounds like the patent is similar to Adobe's patent on the 'invention' of using tabs in palette windows. In other words, it sounds (and smells) like utter bullshit.

      How is the progress of science and useful arts helped by the elimination of Microsoft Word's biggest competitor in Japan?

    23. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by nazsco · · Score: 1

      i'm not sad because of the people or the company, i'm sad for the poor laywer that they found to defend them! for budasake the guy must be the biggest moron in the world for not finding a single prior art for the help icon! i bet the first interface Xerox came up with had one. Even fsking hardware only items must have a label with a bug "?" on top of the printed instructions! c'mon!

      So, this came down that he's:

      a) just the greatest dumb ass in the world

      b) Microsoft paid company B to indirectly destroy company A, wich is a M$ word competitor, and company B used part of the money to pay the guy to preted hes a dumb ass so he can lost the case and buy a new house.

    24. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by ankhank · · Score: 1

      > Johnny Bnemonic-style memory expansion is
      > possible, how can patent holders and companies
      > owning "trade secret" IP be protected from
      > information pirates?

      Standard methods already developed include prefrontal lobotomy, electroshock, and chemical memory erasure ("twilight anaesthesia").

      Check the fine print on your shrinkwrapped employment contract, once they allow you to open and look at it (that'll be the day you decide to leave the company).

    25. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by k96822 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Companies seem to forget the crazy idea of not making their employees want to leave to keep their ideas from getting into the hands of the competition.

    26. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by aminorex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given that the remaining 10% is pretty much just a reaction formation, I think you can include that as well.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    27. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just System, which is the company sued by Matsushita, is loved by people because they
      made wonderful word processor and excellent
      input method for Japanese Kanji.

      Therefore, many people feel as if they are hurt.

      To tell the truth, Ichitaro does not have much
      market share because MS Word takes market share.
      But this news make people buy an Ichitaro of new version that will be released on 10th Feb.

      Matsushita's brands falls into disrepute.
      And boycott campaign has been raised.

    28. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It seems like every user of that software is being hurt. Imaging training on a piece of software since '85 only to have it discontinued."

      Doesn't this seem like a really draconian punishment? The part of the help that violates the patent can't be more than a small percent of the functionality. This is a word-processing app after all. Why can't they just pay a fine and remove the offending feature?

      Not only is Japan's patent system broken, it looks like their legal system is too.

    29. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by AJWM · · Score: 1

      The snowman accessory kit is a design patent (hint: the 'D' starting the patent number). That's closer in concept to a copyright or trademark than a regular (aka 'utility') patent. It doesn't patent the idea of "snowman accessory kits", (the mind boggles), just the particular design of that one.

      The others I'll grant you.

      --
      -- Alastair
    30. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a problem with the patent system, for two reasons:

      You missed the third reason, which trumps the other two:

      3. A patent should not be granted unless doing so promotes the progress of science or the useful arts.

      That concept is codified as supreme law in the USA, but is a good idea for all nations. It's easy to argue that patents on user interface ideas can almost never benefit progress.

      After all, patents are meant as an enticement for inventors to disclose their inventions to the world, instead of hiding it in the basement using it themselves. The revenue potential from a UI enhancement that's displayed in a customer-facing product is thousands or millions of times greater than if it were kept secret. Therefore, the inventor needed no incentive to disclose the idea, so the fact that it was patentable didn't promote progress in any way.

      I believe that there are whole categories of inventions, including most software and business methods, that cannot be realistically exploited without public disclosure, and which thus deserve no patent coverage.

    31. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Therefore, it should not be possible to "taint" work with IP,

      This article is about patents, not copyright, so the concept of "tainting" just doesn't apply.

      If an engineer who's never seen your copyrighted program accidently reproduces it in his own lab, and he can prove to have never viewed your implementation before (which is easiest if you haven't published yet), then he's freely allowed to keep using and selling his own version.

      But if it were a patent instead, then the fact that he's non-tainted avails him nothing. Even if he invented it independently- even if he invented it FIRST- his company cannot utilize a method you've patented without licensing it from you.

    32. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1
      After all, patents are meant as an enticement for inventors to disclose their inventions to the world, instead of hiding it in the basement using it themselves. The revenue potential from a UI enhancement that's displayed in a customer-facing product is thousands or millions of times greater than if it were kept secret. Therefore, the inventor needed no incentive to disclose the idea, so the fact that it was patentable didn't promote progress in any way.

      Exceedingly good point. Mod that post up, somebody.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    33. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a problem of the patent system!

      Sorry, but this 'click on an icon, then click on another to get help on that' thing I have seen on the NeXT about 12 years ago! And I remember a similar mechansim for a painting program on the C64 long long before that.

      This whole patent issue is ridiculus... Can't you see what this is leading to? All ideas 'owned' - the more trivial the better - by large companies and everyone else at their mercy. Orwell was an optimist.

    34. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by LtOcelot · · Score: 1

      Of course, the people are getting hurt indirectly, as they are thus deprived of a choice in the marketplace.

      So, you do understand!

      (By the way, the "infringing company" employs a few of "the people", too.)

    35. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      People seem to forget that they are living in a world that is run by companies.

      Shit on employee (well metaphorically)
      Employee leaves and takes ideas.
      Close down the company he went to.

      It's been nice doing business with you, have a nice day.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    36. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Macadamizer · · Score: 1

      "Allowing a method to do something be patentable is absolutely stupid. Can you imagine if the doctor who developed organ transplant surgery patented all his findings and demanded huge royalties each time a transplant was carried out?"

      This might come as a suprise, but medical techniques are patentable. However, under 35 USC 273, use of such a technique by a nonprofit organization (like a hospital or university) would not be an infringing use.

      Now, if the hospital were a for-profit hospital, then you might have an infringement issue...

      --

      "That's not even wrong..." -- Wolfgang Pauli
    37. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
      "How much knowledge can you take away from your previous employer, even if all that knowledge is just in your head?"
      Cough ... splutter ... splutter

      Are we saying that a company should not be able to hire a software engineer with knowledge of straightforward user interface techniques if he previously used that knowledge at other companies? The techniques were patented which means by definition that they were published to the world. You are not, of course, allowed to take code owned by a prior employer and reuse it. However, I have no idea how I would do software development when I needed to remember whether I used a particular technique for a previous employer and avoid using it if so. What would be the position if another member of the team implemented something similar and I recognised a bug in his code -- would I be unable to fix it because I might not have recognised the bug in the absence of prior experience? Frankly, short of a full frontal lobotomy performed on a departing employee, I see no practical way of enforcing such guidelines.

    38. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Neoncow · · Score: 1
      Can you imagine if the doctor who developed organ transplant surgery patented all his findings and demanded huge royalties each time a transplant was carried out?

      Wait, isn't that one of the reasons we have patents? What if you discovered a better way of doing organ transplants? Wouldn't you deserve to be compensated for your work?

    39. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Viceice · · Score: 1

      yea. But then again, i don't deserve to keep getting huge sums of money for that one discovery for the next 90 years do i?

      Nor is it fair of me to effectively condamn those who can't pay to die simply because i feel the need for huge compensation.

      I think that laws passed should be for the greater benefit, not the benefit of a few.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    40. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Neoncow · · Score: 1

      Right, I totally agree with you. I was under the understanding that patents on medicine lasted 7 years or something. I guess if a doctor discovers some procedure and there is a way of patenting it, the same type of rules should apply

  5. Read it carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on the patent-infinging use of help buttom, word-processing software is ordered to be destroyed...in Japan!

  6. unfuckingbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this world has gone absolutely fucking insane.

    I'm seriously considering moving to the wilderness. If there's any of that left.

    1. Re:unfuckingbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, there is plenty of wilderness left, hippie. contrary to what you think, it has not been destroyed by "THE CORPORATE MACHINE!"

    2. Re:unfuckingbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU you conservatard, imperialist bastard.

    3. Re:unfuckingbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm... not really. most of what's left is inhospitable to humans.

    4. Re:unfuckingbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it has been destroyed by fat-asses like you farting too much and shiting out tons of barely digested fast food.

    5. Re:unfuckingbelievable by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Don't think you will find any help buttons in the wilderness!

      And you probably won't find John the Baptist, either.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    6. Re:unfuckingbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should hope not. John the Baptist has been dead for almost 2000 years. Finding him now would be little morbid.

    7. Re:unfuckingbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whatever. I live in washington state. there is a ridiculous amount of unused land here, all of which is extremely hospitable. lots of fish, game, and anything else you would need to sustain yourself if you decide to live your life unabomber-style.

    8. Re:unfuckingbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your lying makes baby Jesus cry.

    9. Re:unfuckingbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok troll. come to the northwest states sometime. there's nothing but untouched wilderness here.

    10. Re:unfuckingbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've patented moving to the wilderness. So you can't do that without paying me fair compensation for using my Intellectual Property.

    11. Re:unfuckingbelievable by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      this world has gone absolutely fucking insane.

      And they were probably saying the same back when Pythagoras was figuring out stuff about right-angled triangles and having mathematicians he didn't like killed off.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    12. Re:unfuckingbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada welcomes you. Stay away from the Polar Bears though.

  7. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Open Source the offending software, then let them try to take down SourceForge!

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit fucking saying zerg!

    2. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kerrigan is going to be so pissed at you!

    3. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let them take down sourceforge, and you will see a hacking reprisal like nothing this world has ever seen. Right now the really smart hackers are software programmers. they study and exploit stuff to learn how to fix it. most other hackers read something, or was told how to do something, you take away a programmers tablet, and you've got a bunch of very bright and weary idle hands on the internet..... Beware!

  8. as if more proof were needed by ChipMonk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is all the more reason to order the destruction of software patents.

    Also from TFA: Does the Japanese patent system have no concept of "prior art"? The patent in question was granted in 1998, but the products in "violation" has been on the market since 1985 and 1987.

    1. Re:as if more proof were needed by stephenisu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Were the infringing features added before 1998?

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    2. Re:as if more proof were needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The patent in question was granted in 1998, but the products in "violation" has been on the market since 1985 and 1987.

      The patent was applied for before 1985, it was only awarded in 1998. I'm not sure with the U.S., but in Japan the patent process is notoriously slow, that "Patent Applied" is mentioned on all new items. It seems to work pretty well as a deterant, as no one wants their ass sued off once the patent IS awarded.

      That said, Just System WAS insisting that the exact same keyboard function which is not patented is prior art, while Matsushita insists that the same implementation in the GUI required a jump of inspiration, thus justifying the patent.

    3. Re:as if more proof were needed by mboverload · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there is an example, so could anyone provide one where a software patent was indeed a good thing for an inovative feature?

    4. Re:as if more proof were needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for whom? The inventor? The competitors? Society?

      Anyway, RSA is the prototypical example of a "good" software patent.

    5. Re:as if more proof were needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not in this product, but I'm damn sure that there's plenty of prior art around.

    6. Re:as if more proof were needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The patent was applied for in 1989.

      Four years after the release of an early version of the software that didn't use the patented "technology" makes for a much more reasonable claim. It may even be legally correct.

      Morally it stinks, of course, but Japan seems to take pride in proving that the USA doesn't have a monopoly on bad legislation.

    7. Re:as if more proof were needed by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 3, Informative

      could anyone provide one where a software patent was indeed a good thing for an inovative feature?

      I think the case of spreadsheets, which set precedence for software patents, is a good example of what you're asking. I imagine that software ought to have some of the same qualities of inventing physical things. If an inventor has spent an inordinate amount of time creating something innovative then he or she should be able to reap rewards from it and not have someone come along and rip off their plans and sell it themselves. Inventors should have the option of making a living solely from inventing, otherwise there would be a significant lack of development of technology.

      However, many of the software patents that are being introduced that produce such a backlash are such trivial and unimaginative ideas. They actually don't improve technology, but rather hinder its progress, which is the exact opposite of what the whole patent system is meant to achieve. It's supposed to provide incentive for people to innovate, not create bureaucratic obstacles for them.

      And there is also the fact that software in it's very essence is different from physical objects. Software can be quickly distributed from just a single copy, while physical inventions have to be manufactured one by one. Software evolves much faster, and subjecting the development of ideas for software to the same slow bureaucratic rules that apply to physical objects can hinder the overall efficiency of the development of software. But whatever the case, people have to be able to focus on creating ideas to improve technology as their main occupation for making a living, and patents are supposed to allow them to do that.

    8. Re:as if more proof were needed by patio11 · · Score: 1
      RTFAIJ -- read the f article in Japanese :)

      http://japan.cnet.com/news/biz/story/0,2000050156, 20080442,00.htm

      Key days for the patent: Applied for 10-31-1988 Published on 6-20-1991 Registered 7-17-1998

      Why does it take so long for a patent to wend its way through the system? Because the system moves GLACIALLY SLOW here. Matsushita is their own prior art here -- the software product in question didn't start using the context-sensitive help tool until the mid-90s when everybody else started getting in on the whole GUI craze (You may remember -- Oh good gracious, we can click things now!).

      I still think, pragmatically, its not a feature which should be copyrightable but the "obviousness" of certain key features was less than obvious in the late 1980s.

    9. Re:as if more proof were needed by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      In Japan, the first party to file for the patent is the person who is granted the patent, not the first person to invent. It's this way is most countries but not the US.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  9. For those wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is relatively old news in Japan, and the makers of Ichitaro (Just System) have appealed to a higher court. Until a final ruling is made, Ichitaro will be on sale as usual. The court refused to make a preliminary injunction against the Ichitaro software, which Matsushita had requested.

    That said, the patent itself isn't regarding a Help Icon. It is the function where you first click on the help icon/button, and then on the particular function you need help with.

    In court, Just System insisted that the Matsushita Patent was for a help ICON, which is usuall an item on the desktop, much like a file or folder, whereas the Just System Ichitaro used a button. The second point was that the "help" key on a keyboard already performed said function, and taking the keyboard to a GUI analogy did not require any insight, but was rather an obvious move as more and more keyboard functions were moved to the GUI.

    The lower court found that the "icon" was used loosely and would be found to include the buttons-with-pictures as found in Ichitaro. As for the keyboard-to-gui concept, the court found that it would take more than obvious insight to make the leap, thus it was a valid invention.

    Quite obviously, Matsushita was quite pleased that the court bought their story, while Just System was quite pissed off. By appealing to a higher court though, they did not need to immediately follow the ruling.

    Whether you think this was fair game or not, keep in mind that this is pretty much what Microsoft did too with Win95 and IE. Keep the court case going long enough that the Win95/IE bundle was no longer relevant.

    1. Re:For those wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I forgot to mention.... Matsushita DID offer Just System the right to purchase a patent license to continue using the help feature. The price I am not aware of, but Just System pretty much told Matsushita to shove it.

    2. Re:For those wondering... by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 1

      Sounds like what they had in all those Sierra games, Space Quest, Police Quest, etc.

      --
      Fuck it
    3. Re:For those wondering... by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 1

      That said, the patent itself isn't regarding a Help Icon. It is the function where you first click on the help icon/button, and then on the particular function you need help with.

      Uh-oh, didn't Microsoft Excel 4.0 already have such a button, which you could activate, then select a menu item, and receive help on that menu item?

    4. Re:For those wondering... by Decameron81 · · Score: 3, Funny
      That said, the patent itself isn't regarding a Help Icon. It is the function where you first click on the help icon/button, and then on the particular function you need help with.

      In court, Just System insisted that the Matsushita Patent was for a help ICON, which is usuall an item on the desktop, much like a file or folder, whereas the Just System Ichitaro used a button. The second point was that the "help" key on a keyboard already performed said function, and taking the keyboard to a GUI analogy did not require any insight, but was rather an obvious move as more and more keyboard functions were moved to the GUI.


      This is yet another demonstration of how important patents are in the world of computer software. They are here for a reason and that is to protect those companies that spend their money on research and development. Surely Matsushita spent a lot of their resources in developing this advanced help technology and deserve a lot more than seeing some other company make unauthorized use of it. It doesn't matter wether Just System wrote from scratch their own implementation because they are plainly copying an IDEA, which surely is a great loss for whoever came up with it.

      We should also thank patents because they help make courts throughout the world a better place. When we spend our time fighting for our rights to make exclusive use of certain icons and functions we do not have the time to commit serious crimes. An even further step could be to bring to court more trivial matters like unauthorized clicking of buttons by end users.

      Patents also teach us about the importance of being selfish. Don't get me wrong: usually being selfish is seen as a bad thing; but to some extent you have to worry about yourself as well. I really appreciate it that our governments are starting to realize how important it is to have full control over anything you might have ever thought.

      Ideas need to be protected.
      --
      diegoT
    5. Re:For those wondering... by KontinMonet · · Score: 1

      Ideas need to be protected.

      Corporate ideas need to be protected.

      --
      Did he inhale?
    6. Re:For those wondering... by bicho · · Score: 1
      Whether you think this was fair game or not, keep in mind that this is pretty much what Microsoft did too with Win95 and IE. Keep the court case going long enough that the Win95/IE bundle was no longer relevant.


      Doesn't Microsoft have a patent on that process?
      --

      errera hunamum ets
    7. Re:For those wondering... by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      And rightly so. Patenting a HELP ICON is ridiculous. I'm surprised at the number of posts half-defending Matsushita. Had MS done the same, everyone would be frothing at the mouth. It really is a ridiculous patent.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    8. Re:For those wondering... by xtronics · · Score: 1

      I hope "their money on research and development" was sarcastic.

      This is not a patentable idea in my book - it is trivial, obvious and should never have been granted a patent. I bet it took almost hal a day to write the code.

      I would also bet that there is prior art.

  10. we're not alone by ianmalcm · · Score: 3, Funny
    Proof that the US patent and court systems arent alone in their noncompetitive lunacy.

    Hopefully Nintendo does not sue /. for use of that Linux penguin icon, which is an obvious ripoff of Super Mario 64's snow level character.

    1. Re:we're not alone by strider44 · · Score: 1

      uhem, the linux penguin has been around more well over a year before Super Mario 64. Sorry Nintendo, no case.

    2. Re:we're not alone by strider44 · · Score: 1

      sorry retract that. It was less than a year, but it was still beforehand!

    3. Re:we're not alone by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Nintendo is a corporation, while the OSS crowd is not. Since in court Corporations Are Always Right, the Linux crowd obviously violated Nintendo's patent on graphical depictions of penguins in any form, before Nintendo even had it.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:we're not alone by x_codingmonkey_x · · Score: 1
      Hopefully Nintendo does not sue /. for use of that Linux penguin icon, which is an obvious ripoff of Super Mario 64's snow level character.

      Don't give them ideas!

  11. Dear Godzilla by stephenisu · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the enclosed envelope is a map of all Japanese Patent Offices.
    They told me to tell you that your mother is a dishonorable dirty woman.

    attatchment [jpomap.png]

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    1. Re:Dear Godzilla by ceeam · · Score: 1, Funny

      Godzilla's mother is a woman??? Uhm, it's not Ripley by any chance, right?

    2. Re:Dear Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, mod down any 'free iPod' posters! This is getting more and more annoying!

    3. Re:Dear Godzilla by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      Godzilla's mother is a woman??? Uhm, it's not Ripley by any chance, right?

      Actually, it is. Believe it or not.

    4. Re:Dear Godzilla by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Moderated: +1, Cross-domain punning humor.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  12. Openoffice? by ricochet81 · · Score: 1

    Openoffice isn't a serious competitor to MS Word?

    --
    Error: Id10t detected
    1. Re:Openoffice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nup.

    2. Re:Openoffice? by Pieroxy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nope. Running on a marginal OS doesn't make a product a serious competitor to anyone, but marginal software.

      Don't take marginal in the bad sense. Just means low market penetration. That's all.

    3. Re:Openoffice? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Windows is a marginal OS?

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    4. Re:Openoffice? by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I had to make a quick check and there it is - http://ja.openoffice.org/index.html

      Looks good to me but I do not speak a word of japanese.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    5. Re:Openoffice? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Ooops, my bad. I don't know what I'm smoking these days...

      Anyways, anyone has numbers on word processor market share? How big is MSOffice (apart from "very big") vs OpenOffice?

    6. Re:Openoffice? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen numbers, but I'd put money on desktop Linux having a bigger share than OpenOffice.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  13. Wait a sec by deusexcrottsma · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those bastards probably stole Clippy, too. Not that I ever tolerated Clippy's presence on the screen. In fact I hated him with a passion. But it's the principle of the the thing. Can't have Clippy ravaged and transmuted into a multitude of Japanese variants. He's the American Satan, not some overseas, sandal-wearing, fish-monger.

    1. Re:Wait a sec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Japan, Clippy is Anime-Clippy

    2. Re:Wait a sec by goatan · · Score: 1
      Can't have Clippy ravaged and transmuted into a multitude of Japanese variants. He's the American Satan, not some overseas, sandal-wearing, fish-monger.

      But wouldn't you prefer some sort of tentacle monster advsing you rather than a paper clip.

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

  14. That is so insane... by TheOnlyJuztyn · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is this kind of petty moneymaking really what the fathers of patent law intended? When is a court going to take a stand on this crap? We're talking about the legal ownership of common ideas here. I can see some places where it is useful, like velcro and the shape of a coke bottle, where the idea is actually unique - but being able to patent the use of an ICON to access a HELP page? - Both very common computer terms stiched together by an uninspiring and unoriginal idea. What's next, someone patenting the use of a 'Submit button' to pass data through a form? Whoops, slashdot's gotta a cease and desist notice knocking.

    Where do we draw the line?

    1. Re:That is so insane... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should read the fucking article before posting righteous rantings.

    2. Re:That is so insane... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely this novel, non-obvious idea must already patented?!

    3. Re:That is so insane... by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      I can see some places where it is useful, like velcro and the shape of a coke bottle

      About that... check this out. I read the article on Guerrillanews.com ages ago, but they seemed to have changed their site and I can't find if they still have it somewhere. I think it's about the copyright of images of the contour coke bottle. It has this "David vs. Goliath" thing with Coca-cola as the villian. But this "derivative art" copyright thing seems kind of screwy to me, and it seems like allowing the copyright to be public domain would be the right thing, rather than transferring it to derivative works.

  15. Prior art by GtKincaid · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Oh come on , this is just silly . didnt this exist back on the early versions of the mac OS.

    not to mention Gallerys with spoken tours on a button push .. that may be pushing it but this is so obvious

    1. Re:Prior art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA, bub.

  16. That sounds a lot like... by pv2b · · Score: 1

    That said, the patent itself isn't regarding a Help Icon. It is the function where you first click on the help icon/button, and then on the particular function you need help with.

    That sounds a lot like that [?] button in the toolbar in certain Microsoft programs and dialog boxes in Windows. It's pretty rare -- the feature didn't really seem to take off -- but it does exist here and there. When clicked, the mouse cursor gets a '?' next to it, and clicking a widget will pop up a tooltip-like description of what the widget does. I haven't used Windows for several years, so I can't be more specific or give any details. Maybe someone else knows more?

    1. Re:That sounds a lot like... by F13 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Its contextual help. Applications can also have it in the help menu and on toolbars.

      See msdn for more information

    2. Re:That sounds a lot like... by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      It's context help, and is used in many desktops, not just Windows. The icon only appears when the window can make use of it. Usually this is when the window is a dialog. KDE is one example. If the window sets the context help flag (it's a standard X11 WM hint), then the window titlebar will have that icon, and the appropriate message sent to the application when it is used. Right now as I type this my Konqueror window has this icon and it's fully functional.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    3. Re:That sounds a lot like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also is in kde applications. I don't know if others toolkits/independient aplications also uses the contextual help

    4. Re:That sounds a lot like... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it does sound almost exactly like that. Almost every dialog Microsoft makes uses it. (Although I suppose they could have licensed it or just disabled the feature in the Japanese version.)

      Easiest way to demo this is to bring up the Desktop properties window. The little [?] will be in the righthand corner next to the X. You can also right click on most of the items to see a context menu with "What's This?" on it.

      It's also used in Microsoft Office applications and IE. In fact, I can't really think of any application that uses it that Microsoft didn't write. (Well, it turns out Nero 6 does, but it forgets the "What's This?" context menu and shows the context help immediately on a right click.)

      Can anyone find something that explains exactly what they're being sued over? Microsoft has made something very similar a part of the standard Windows dialog controls for quite a while now.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    5. Re:That sounds a lot like... by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

      In this Ichitaro's case, a '?' mark is accompanied with a relevant small image (or icon). In the standard context help of Windows, it's only a '?' mark and considered as a character, not icon. By adding an icon to the context help button, it was judged that it infringed the patent of Matsushita which was granted for their word-processor computer back in 1980's.

    6. Re:That sounds a lot like... by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      It's pretty rare -- the feature didn't really seem to take off -- but it does exist here and there.

      I recall System 7 on the Macintosh had a feature like this called "Balloon Help" back in the early nineties. It may have been in earlier versions, I forget.

    7. Re:That sounds a lot like... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      It was introduced with System 7.0--May 1991

    8. Re:That sounds a lot like... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that Microsoft used to have a little icon of a speech balloon containing a ? that was used to activate the context sensative help, and that at some point it was moved to the title bar for no apparent reason. I guess that's why.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    9. Re:That sounds a lot like... by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is like this 1987 system.

  17. watch your language! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If Ichitaro would have just used....

    If Ichitaro had just used....

    This post brought to you by the letter 'P' and the number 6.

  18. Not enough caffine... by HeliumHigh · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read this as "Fallout Japanese Patent Needs Help?"

    Really? Well, back to fallout2...

    1. Re:Not enough caffine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wasn't just you, but i am pretty stoned :D

  19. Even more filler? by rafael_es_son · · Score: 4, Informative

    By gosh the summary's innacuracy is comparable to Microsoft marketing propaganda. The article does not state clearly "that the use of a help icon" was the cause of the dispute. It does say

    The dispute centered on the way that a help function works in the Ichitaro and Hanako software. The way the software presents information violates Matsushita patent number 2,803,236, which was registered with the Japanese patent office in 1998, according to Matsushita.

    The Gnome pics, now this? filler for nerds, stuff that doesn't happen?

    --
    HAD
    1. Re:Even more filler? by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      The Gnome pics, now this? filler for nerds, stuff that doesn't happen?
      • You must be new here, that's normal.
      • Give the thread a few more minutes and the "In Soviet Russia" and "Step 5: Profit" jokes will show up. The GNAA trolls have probably already shown up but got modded into oblivion already.

        Just /. as usual. :)

    2. Re:Even more filler? by rafael_es_son · · Score: 2, Funny

      Humans have been killing each other since societal organization indirectly caused overpopulation. We must be new here. It must be normal.

      Just humans as usual. ;)

      --
      HAD
    3. Re:Even more filler? by MeridianOnTheLake · · Score: 4, Informative

      The English-language article wasn't as detailed as the Japanese reports. You know how you can hit shift-F1 in MS products and you get the arrow with a question mark which you then use to get help on a subsequent element on the screen... well this is the same except that you can click an icon as an alternative to shift-F1. There are some screen shots at the bottom of this Japanese-language article: http://japan.cnet.com/news/biz/story/0,2000050156, 20080442,00.htm

    4. Re:Even more filler? by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Mod this guy up. No one else has had the sense to mention the patent number.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    5. Re:Even more filler? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Are you shitting me? That button is a standard feature on a lot of Microsoft dialog boxes. Putting it on the toolbar for a regular app is no different. I'm guessing MS licensed it and these guys thought they were just implementing a standard feature in a different part of the application. I think Microsoft should be sued for not informing people that their operating system is patent encumbered and implementing standard Windows features in your applications exposes you to patent liability.

  20. Destroyed? by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good to see we're still finding reasons to destroy content just like the warmer moments of various regimes throughout time. What a waste.

  21. some interesting ideas on patent law by wakejagr · · Score: 1

    One of the editorials on this story mentioned an interesting patent law rant located here.


    One of his ideas: "In order to collect the inventors' royalties, an association representing the inventors' interests should be established and affiliated to the patent offices. This would be an association similar to the associations that collect royalties for musical performances and pay these to the composers."


    Because what we really need is another RIAA!

    --
    Don't save Windows XP! http://www.petitiononline.com/jjw1xp/petition.html
    1. Re:some interesting ideas on patent law by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "...the associations that collect royalties for musical performances and pay these to the composers."...

      Because what we really need is another RIAA!

      RIAA != ASCAP/BMI/SESAC.

      RIAA are evil bastards who exploit musicians, degrade the art of music, and will be first against the wall when the revolution comes.

      ASCAP et. al, while flawed in execution, are based on a good idea: songwriters should get a cut when someone makes money off a song they wrote. If I sell a CD with a cover of "Tangled Up in Blue", or play it at a gig at my local tavern, these are the guys who make sure Dylan gets his nickel out of the profits. (Google for "songwriter royalties performance mechanical".) However - and this is key - if I'm playing for fun not profit, Bob doesn't get a penny.

      For years I've been suggesting that royalties for copying recordings ought to work the same way - share for free, but if you're selling the artist gets a cut.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:some interesting ideas on patent law by hab136 · · Score: 1
      However - and this is key - if I'm playing for fun not profit, Bob doesn't get a penny.

      Especially when ASCAP sues the Girl Scouts. The birds may sing, but campers can't unless they pay up

    3. Re:some interesting ideas on patent law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't believe ASCAP/BMI are just as evil as the RIAA, then you've never worked with them. I have...they're evil regardless of the original intent of their existence. Not unlike the BPA.

    4. Re:some interesting ideas on patent law by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Especially when ASCAP sues the Girl Scouts

      Except they didn't.

      But yes, there is a sometimes a fine line about what constitutes for-profit use.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  22. The Japanese by classh_2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Japanese are known for their ability to copy an idea and then "make it better", in their own unique style (e.g. the VCR, automobile, etc.). Let's hope they can break away from that paradigm when it comes to patent law. From the sound of this article though, it looks like that might give the U.S. a run for it's money in regards to IP fascism. *sigh*

    1. Re:The Japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, thanks! While we're are it, Blacks have a good sense of rhythm. Indians smell like curry. Filipinos wear flashy clothes.

    2. Re:The Japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! My grandfather called. He wants his prejudices back!

    3. Re:The Japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, thanks! While we're are it, Blacks have a good sense of rhythm. Indians smell like curry. Filipinos wear flashy clothes.

      Chef: Hey, hey, hey! Children, that's not cool. You don't make fun of somebody because of their ethnicity.
      Stan: You don't?
      Kyle: But Chef, you just ripped on Chinese people.
      Chef: No, no, no, no ,no, that's different. I made fun of them because they are from China. You see it's not ok to make fun of an American because they're black brown or whatever. But it is ok to make fun of foreigners because they're from another country.
      Kids: Ooooh.
      Cartman: Oh alright.
      Kevin: Yeah.

  23. reincorporate in the EU? by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

    Hmm, couldn't they try something like this: open a subsidiary in the EU, sell them the software for a penny, and let the subsidiary sell the software internationally over the web, but advertize heavily in Japan? Do Japanese software patents apply to goods legally purchased overseas?

    1. Re:reincorporate in the EU? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Yes

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    2. Re:reincorporate in the EU? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      No.

      Who's going to sue who? If JapanCorp doesn't want someone in America selling something, then TOO BAD FOR JapanCorp. You can't sue an American company in Japan (unless they have a branch in Japan).

      Japanese laws don't apply to me, for example. If I want to ship some infringing software to Japan, that's my business. The Japanese government can't stop me. Customs can go after the importer or reject the shipment, though.

      --
      My other car is first.
    3. Re:reincorporate in the EU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can 'manufacture' and 'market' said word processor in the EU, or on some island in the middle of the ocean that you buy for the purpose.
      But when you 'import' the word processor into Japan, the patent holder can go to court and the judge will ask you politely to cease and desist. Maybe the patent owner will grant you a license, maybe not. So you'll have trouble legally getting it to Japanese citizens, unless by agreement with the patent holder.

  24. Patents must be published by brunos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are forgetting that if you patent something, it is not a trade secret anymore. You don't need Bnemonic style memory: all you need to do is read the patent, which is your legal right. How would you otherwise know what you are not allowed to copy?
    Software patents are just ridiculous.

    1. Re:Patents must be published by JohnFluxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's very dangerous to read patents because while infringing on a patent is bad, infringing on a patent knowingly is double as bad (literally - I seem to remember double damages?). If it can be shown that you even glanced at the patent, whether you thought it applied or not, you are in trouble.

    2. Re:Patents must be published by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      for fuck sake, it's Johnny Mnemonic.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Patents must be published by pmc · · Score: 5, Funny

      We really need some sort of system so that people remember the spelling.

    4. Re:Patents must be published by uhlume · · Score: 1

      heh. mod parent up funny.

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    5. Re:Patents must be published by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do it is called bnemonic. ;)

    6. Re:Patents must be published by halivar · · Score: 1

      for fuck sake, it's Johnny Mnemonic.

      Maybe he was just trying to forget, like you should have been if you were a sane man.

    7. Re:Patents must be published by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IdIot, stop persisting in such a stupid fucking spelling and maybe it will go away.

      Fucking stupid mnoronic IdIot.

    8. Re:Patents must be published by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      'It's very dangerous to read patents because'

      If everyone knew how to implement a patented work it would be come unenforceable.

      Dangerous but only to the proliferation patents.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    9. Re:Patents must be published by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for fuck's sake, it's "for fuck's sake".

    10. Re:Patents must be published by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      I WANT ROOMSERVICE!

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    11. Re:Patents must be published by x_codingmonkey_x · · Score: 1

      make sure to patent it!

    12. Re:Patents must be published by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Many
      Nerds
      Enraged (by)
      Many
      Other
      Nerd's
      Illiterate
      Commentary

    13. Re:Patents must be published by d474 · · Score: 1

      no no...it's Johny Xneumonic.

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    14. Re:Patents must be published by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A spelling flame gets modded +4 Insightful? If the poster had bothered to capitalize "for" correctly, I coulda seen it.

    15. Re:Patents must be published by uhlume · · Score: 1

      ...A bnemonic system?

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    16. Re:Patents must be published by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always thought silent M is too weird, let's just call him Johnny Pneumatic

    17. Re:Patents must be published by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You have appearantly never read a US software patent. The claim that they reveal what they are patenting is sheer nonsense. (Well, ok, so I'm judging on the basis of two patents. I shouldn't make such a global assertion...but others have said similar things, so I believe that it's at least generally true.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    18. Re:Patents must be published by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong again...it's Johnny GNUmonic. ::ducks::

    19. Re:Patents must be published by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      "I need a Sino-Logic 60, Sogo 7 data gloves, a GPL'd stealth module" - Johnny Mnemonic

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
  25. MOD PARENT UP by X · · Score: 1

    Here here! I wish at least those summarizing the article would bother to read it!

    Heck, the "ordered the destruction" bit was pretty misleading as well. The product wasn't ordered destroyed, just existing stocks of the product. The company still has the product, and I'm sure if they win an appeal or if they change their product's help system, they can put the product back on the shelves.

    --
    sigs are a waste of space
  26. Follow the Money.... by cliffiecee · · Score: 4, Informative
    Just a moment of googling "kitadeya microsoft" and bingo. Here's a snip:

    "Matsushita Electric, in close cooperation with Microsoft, will develop a high-performance personal computer suited to the advanced image-processing demands of the 21st century," said Dr. Yoshitomi Nagaoka, vice president of Matsushita Electric's AVC Company..."



    Who stands to profit if this software is knocked off the market?
    1. Re:Follow the Money.... by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

      "Matsushita Electric, in close cooperation with Microsoft, will develop a high-performance personal computer suited to the advanced image-processing demands of the 21st century," said Dr. Yoshitomi Nagaoka, vice president of Matsushita Electric's AVC Company..."

      Ah, yeah. You found proof that a large (perhaps the largest) electronics manufacturer on the planet is doing something together with the largest software manufacturer on the planet.

      Quite something. Who'd have thought?

    2. Re:Follow the Money.... by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 1

      Very true, Matsushita is so big, it probably cooperates with every other company in the world.

    3. Re:Follow the Money.... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Especially with Just System.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:Follow the Money.... by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      You didn't happen to notice that the year listed was 2000, almost five years ago. Besides, this is an overly vague press release.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    5. Re:Follow the Money.... by cliffiecee · · Score: 1

      I did indeed notice.

      I also read the article...

      "[Matsushita] first approached Justsystem in 1998, asking that it recognise its patent and agree to pay royalties, but received no response, he said."

  27. Another Patent Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Along the same lines, the EasyMoney fund was ordered to close down by court order because it had infringed a patent of a global brokerage firm. The patent reads: buy low and sell high.

  28. Ichitaro is here to stay by pario · · Score: 3, Informative

    I really don't think Ichitaro would disappear from the market anytime soon. Ichitaro used to dominate the word processor market back in the days of MS-DOS, just like Word Perfect did in the United States, and still remains a very important player. Major companies and a number of government branches still rely heavily on Ichitaro because it can produce documents in forms that are specific to the Japanese corporate and governmental culture, which is not possible with Microsoft Word. Just System is a major software company famous for their ATOK kana-kanji conversion system. Kana-kanji conversion systems are essential for Japanese input, and ATOK, with its smart lexical recognition AI engine, has been the unparalleled leader for over a decade.

  29. Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that after slashdot posted some compromising photos of b.g a couple of weeks ago(low blow), MS will no longer except the /. annoyance and will start offing some of us.

  30. The smoking gun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Holy smokes! Pana and Microsoft were plotting this back 4 years ago... Oh man...

    1. Re:The smoking gun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is clearly some kind of cartoon super villain. Wherever this sort of shenanigans goes on, Microsoft is somewhere nearby. What's missing is some sort of cartoon super hero who defeats the super villain every time.

    2. Re:The smoking gun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there is a big dinosaur and a flaming fox pushing back against Bill's IE squad, clad in gear with a big blue lowercase e. Now we just need something to take on that damn paperclip...

    3. Re:The smoking gun! by khallow · · Score: 1
      Microsoft is clearly some kind of cartoon super villain. Wherever this sort of shenanigans goes on, Microsoft is somewhere nearby. What's missing is some sort of cartoon super hero who defeats the super villain every time.

      Google is a powerful tool.

  31. OH COME ON by Tab+is+on+Slashdot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did it have to be "fallout"?

  32. Japanese Tongue Twister About Patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tokyo tokkyo kyoka-kyoku kyou kyuukyo kyoka kyakka.

    Translation: The Tokyo patent office hurriedly rejected the permission today.

  33. Prior Art? by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    "Matsushita patent number 2,803,236, which was registered with the Japanese patent office in 1998, according to Matsushita." -Article

    OK. Click on icon then click on items on the screen seems like that has been around for a while. They are saying they had it patented in 1998.

    What are some earlier programs/OSs that had this feature?

    1. Re:Prior Art? by jeif1k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It was filed in 1989, which is what counts. The fact that it floated around in the patent system until issue in 1998 shows how good the company is at playing the system.

    2. Re:Prior Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about windows with the question mark control icon? Click the question mark, then click the item to get help about the item. Been in there since Windows 95.

    3. Re:Prior art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Matsuhita made application of that patent on 26th Sep 1989.
      But the claims of the patent does not seem innovative.

      Because Sun Microsystems and Apple Computer
      apply almost the same patents prior to Matsushita's patent.

      Therefore, many people who work in IT company
      are surprised and get angry with Matsushita.

  34. This Statement: by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    "We are a global enterprise and we are just following international practice to enforce our IP rights"

    And somebody just criticized my opposition to IP laws because "the rest of the world has adopted the American model"...like that meant something...

    Well, here you go...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:This Statement: by lokedhs · · Score: 1

      That's the argument the pro-patent-lobby in the EU use.

    2. Re:This Statement: by saihung · · Score: 1

      Classic flawed logic. The right to do something is not the same as the obligation to do it. I have the right to mock the elderly, but I don't HAVE to. I just CHOOSE to.

    3. Re:This Statement: by idlemachine · · Score: 1
      And somebody just criticized my opposition to IP laws because "the rest of the world has adopted the American model"...like that meant something...

      Your critics might like to look into how the US uses 'free' trade agreements to "convince" others to adopt their patent system model.

  35. MacOS 7 as prior art? by jeti · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The short description of the patent sounds very much like the help system that appeared in several incarnations on MacOS.
    AFAIK the bubble help gave context sensitive information on GUI elements after activating it with a button.
    Apparently MacOS 7 came out two years before the patent was filed. Here's a screenshot of MacOS 7 with the help icon and a copyright notice.

    1. Re:MacOS 7 as prior art? by Jkames · · Score: 0

      That is not MacOS 7... It's a window blind theme with a program called WINMAC. MacOS doesn't run on pentium systems as the screenshot says "PENTIUM MMX". It makes you look like an idiot to have a mocked windows system as a display of a different os even though the same icon may have been used. Try harder next time...

    2. Re:MacOS 7 as prior art? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard of running in an emulator? Well that's what's happening there.

      --
      My other car is first.
    3. Re:MacOS 7 as prior art? by gregorio · · Score: 1
      Have you ever heard of running in an emulator? Well that's what's happening there.
      No, it is not. It is a fully native x86 Windows System running WindowBlinds. It's just a Windowing theme system.

      The website-provided description for your "Mac OS picture": "ObjectBar 0.3 Alpha, WindowBlinds 2.1, EuroCalculator and ColorPad running on this Mac OS 7 inspired desktop.".

      For anyone curious about this issue, the subdomain "pcdesktops.emuunlim.com" is dedicated to WindowBlinds screenshot sections. The full URL to the screenshot is here.
    4. Re:MacOS 7 as prior art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posts like this remind me that we really need an "Ignorant" moderation. Perhaps even a "Moronic" moderation.

    5. Re:MacOS 7 as prior art? by translator · · Score: 1

      apparently the patent is for domestic.
      and therefore the overseas 'prior art' does not apply.
      well, so i've read.

  36. Ichitaro and JustSystem by davejenkins · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate to say it, but this really is a minimal event for the overall market-- no one I know has used Ichitaro for years. MSWord is fully entrenched here, and will be for the forseeable future.

    In regards to Open Source alternatives such as OpenOffice, they are sorley lacking in Kanji conversion, dictionaries, and layout flexibility. I know that Turbo and Others put effort into this, but progress is slow...

    1. Re:Ichitaro and JustSystem by nagora · · Score: 3, Insightful
      is really is a minimal event for the overall market

      Being allowed to successfully sue over a help icon is not a minimal event. Bad judgements like these are used as precedents in later cases regardless of the importance of the initial trial. Many a bad law has been formed on the basis of a neighbour's hedge.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:Ichitaro and JustSystem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AbiWord, it has japanees support too

    3. Re:Ichitaro and JustSystem by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I hate to say it, but this really is a minimal event for the overall market-- no one I know has used Ichitaro for years. MSWord is fully entrenched here, and will be for the forseeable future.

      The issue is not Ichitaro. The issue is being able to develop software without having to look over your shoulder at the big corporations with their patent portfolios all the time. If decisions like this are allowed to stand, then small businesses cannot create software - because if anything they produce is any good, they will be sued out of existence by corporations with portfolios they can't match.

      It's my view that software patents should not be allowed at all. But if they are going to be allowed the bar for non-obviousness and novelty has to be very high indeed.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    4. Re:Ichitaro and JustSystem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ichitaro is the standard for documents produced in and used by a lot of ministries and agencies. Our publishing house has to maintain a couple of Ichitaro installs just to deliver stuff to government clients. Yeah, it's been losing ground to MS for years, but it's still a big damn presence.

    5. Re:Ichitaro and JustSystem by BJH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a big difference between being able to type in Japanese, and fully supporting Japanese text.

      For example, does ABiword allow you to set your text to be 20x20 vertical lines, running right to left, with fixed spacing? This is the sort of feature that kept Ichitaro around for a long time when it should otherwise have been dead (for all intents and purposes, it is dead now, but back in the day, there was quite a lot of infighting in government departments between the entrenched Ichitaro users and the upstart Word users).

    6. Re:Ichitaro and JustSystem by Atsi+Otani · · Score: 1

      Actually, quite a few people still use Ichitaro. I read an article in the Asahi Shinbun that mentioned that the court that issued this order uses Ichitaro itself.

    7. Re:Ichitaro and JustSystem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bigget customer is the government office.
      Also a courthouse is the big customer of Ichitaro.

      The presiding judgethe always writes decision using Ichitaro.

      But in this a trial, the presiding judgethe
      uses other word processor (may be MS Word?)
      on purpose. The news report emphasize it.

      So, some people think that Microsoft asked Matsushita to sue Justsystem because Ichitaro
      is the big competitor against MS-Word in Japan.

      It's very funny!

  37. SDRC (now UGS) I-DEAS CAD Software has this and by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    it's called "Help On Context".

    You click an icon, the cursor changes to question mark, then you click something else of interest.

    A browser appears with whatever relevant information happens to be on hand for that particular item.

    Of all the help systems, I like this one the best. Beats looking through indexes, of things you may or may not actually know about, to maybe sort of find the information of interest. (Assuming it exists in the first place.)

  38. it has nothing to do with who worked where by jeif1k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    how can patent holders and companies owning "trade secret" IP be protected from information pirates?

    Patents are not trade secrets. The fact that someone moved between companies doesn't make the patent claim any more valid.

    Furthermore, the ossified Japanese economy needs to encourage mobility of workers, in particular, high-tech workers. The kind of exchange of knowledge and ideas that brings is essential to a high-tech economy. Even if your argument were valid that this has to do with employees moving between companies, it would still be a bad decision from that point of view.

    What makes this patent particularly vile is that it was filed in 1989 but granted in 1998; this almost certainly constitutes a deliberate abuse of the patent system by Matsushita.

    Most of the "ideas" that companies generate (in particular Japanese companies) were almost entirely developed in academia anyway; it is only companies that can afford to do carpet patenting in order to snare others in their so-called IP. Let's hope that universities will be fighting back aggressively by patenting themselves; once companies face huge patent portfolios without the ability to cross license, then maybe things will change.

    1. Re:it has nothing to do with who worked where by Jerry · · Score: 1
      What makes this patent particularly vile is that it was filed in 1989 but granted in 1998; this almost certainly constitutes a deliberate abuse of the patent system by Matsushita.


      Exactly. And, I'll wager that if you research the patent you'll find that it was held in an 'open' state for a decade and mofidied regularly as advances in technology occured. Typical "submarine patent".

      --

      Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    2. Re:it has nothing to do with who worked where by Macadamizer · · Score: 1

      "What makes this patent particularly vile is that it was filed in 1989 but granted in 1998; this almost certainly constitutes a deliberate abuse of the patent system by Matsushita.

      Exactly. And, I'll wager that if you research the patent you'll find that it was held in an 'open' state for a decade and mofidied regularly as advances in technology occured. Typical "submarine patent"."

      That's possible, but the time frame for getting a patent issued in Japan is MUCH longer than it is in the U.S. I don't think 7-9 years is out of line for a normal patent application in Japan. Just because something took nearly a decade doesn't mean that there is something nefarious going on -- the JPO is just slow as hell...

      --

      "That's not even wrong..." -- Wolfgang Pauli
  39. cross licensing by jeif1k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Microsoft probably has a patent cross-licensing agreement with Matsushita, or at least they may have already forged an agreement (maybe as part of another deal). It actually stands to reason that Microsoft initiated all of this.

  40. Just you wait!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someday someone is going to do something really clever with Microsoft's agent API, and you'll all still hate it out of habbit but everyone will use it.

    1. Re:Just you wait!! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. The Agent API is quite powerful with text to speech and speech recognition supported. But the best that's been managed is stuff like Clippy, CyberBuddy, and add ons for Power Point presentations. Not a stunning record after 8 years. Cute is easy, but doesn't stay cute long. Useful is hard. (And using it for a help or search function wasn't useful.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Just you wait!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I'd do is use the API to deploy a customizable agent, like Bonzi Buddy on corporate desktops. Limit the search function to strickly the corporate domain, and perhaps use user/group information to refine the search. Build in so snooping. And most imporatntly build in an ability to beat the hell out of the logo/mascot, and mercilessly vent frustration upon it. Log that data along with searches and time. Then you could at night use scripts to mine the network for the events that are really frustrating, preventing work from being done by combining the information with local log information reguarding other errors (application, file services etc) and searches that are going awry. Not only could the data prove useful, but I have a suspicion that beating the hell out of a virtual personification of the company would make people feel better about working there.

  41. Modders, -1 the parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is it insightful?

    1. Re:Modders, -1 the parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is it insightful?

      Because Japan's claim to fame was their ability to take an idea, copy it, and mass produce it. Look at how quickly they adopted the railroad. Commodore Perry in 1853 and 1854 bought with him a 1/3 scale train to a country that had it's doors to the west for so long they never saw a steam ship. Japan went from no industry what so ever to it's first railroad in 1872. I won't even get into the sewing machine.

      Midevil to world power in under a century. That is a claim few can make. This is impressive! This is Japan.

  42. Does anyone have any published financials for by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    Matsushita Electric Industrial? Any large sums of money being placed from a certain MSFT?

    Micorosft suddenly 'licensed' thier help patent to fund thier lawers?

    I say, if the shit hits the fan, the company shoudl open source the software to GNU, and then .jp people can download the software sans help icon for free, and kick the bastard competition in the nuts, with steel toe caps.

    The the company can run support and customisation for all users who now have the free version.

    Then when the other company goes bust, they can start selling newer versions.

    Thats capitalism for you.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
    1. Re:Does anyone have any published financials for by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 1

      I get the feeling you've never heared of Matsushita before. Matsushita is a company with about 340.000 employees.

    2. Re:Does anyone have any published financials for by Atsi+Otani · · Score: 1

      I've read quite a few posts referring to money from MSFT, but I don't think that's the case. According to a Japanese article, this whole thing came up because Matsushita was apparently trying to kick Sotec (a fairly new company that makes cheap PCs) out of business.


      November 2002 Matsushita requests injunction to prevent Sotec and Justsystem for selling PCs that bundle Justsystem's "Just Home 2 Kakeibo Pack," which allegedly infringes the help patent. Sotec stops selling the PCs in question.

      August 2003 Justsystem goes to court, trying to confirm that Matsushita has no right to stop sale of Just Home 2.

      August 2004 Justsystem wins in court. Matsushita immediately sues Justsystem for Ichitaro and Hanako.


      By the way, Justsystem started selling Linux versions of Ichitaro and Atok last year.

  43. Incendiary prose by daithimacseoin · · Score: 1
    The Tokyo District Court has ordered the destruction of Ichitaro..

    Am I the only one who found this sentence a bit dramatic?

    "Destroy all Copies"

    I can just imagine Mothra zapping the software with its antenna rays...

    1. Re:Incendiary prose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can just imagine Mothra zapping the software with its antenna rays...

      Funny, of all the giant japanese monsters I've always thought that Mothra would be the most in favor of open software and against software patents. Now Godzilla or Gehdera are a different story entirely....

  44. Publicly disgrace company by tod_miller · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Matsushita, which sells its products under the Panasonic brand

    I certainly won't be buying anything Panasonic for a long while. I hope that by making it a public disgrace for a company to endanger 78% of the installed office environments in Japan (think what loss of productivity would occur if they spread enough FUD to make those people buy thier product, and install it, and learn it?).

    Japan has a very honourable work ethic in terms of employee/employer relations, they value the company, so the political fall out over this may yet to come.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
    1. Re:Publicly disgrace company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly won't be buying anything Panasonic for a long while. I hope that by making it a public disgrace for a company to endanger 78% of the installed office environments in Japan

      No; it has 78% of the *retail* market, and most office software isn't obtained through that route.

      (think what loss of productivity would occur if they spread enough FUD to make those people buy thier product, and install it, and learn it?).

      I don't think it'll make any difference. They'll do what they did with WWII war-crimes, and deny them for years for reasons of honor.

      Despite the fact that the denial makes them look infintely more dishonorable than a full confession would, and will continue to smear their reputation for years to come.

      Not that I reckon this will happen with Matsushita/Panasonic.

    2. Re:Publicly disgrace company by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Don't forget JVC, Technics.

  45. strange definition of competitor by guile*fr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if the 78% figure of the article is accurate, they are not just a competitor of Microsoft. they f*cking own them.

    1. Re:strange definition of competitor by vidarh · · Score: 1

      78% of retail sales. The article also claims that the majority of office suites in Japan are sold pre-installed on new computers.

  46. May as well face it, this is the future by serutan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We'll be seeing more and more of these, as the great Land Rush of IP patents continues. Equating intangibles with property is like creating a whole new world, ready to be staked out and fenced off like the American West in the 1800s. Eventually, creating something new and innovative without a battery of lawyers or a big corporation behind you will be as quaint a notion as walking out into the wilderness and setting up a farm.

  47. Erm by jb.hl.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can we please know when the patent was applied for, so we can see if there's any prior art?

    I would have thought that in 1985 Apple would have already had a help icon on their Macs...

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    1. Re:Erm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have thought that in 1985 Apple would have already had a help icon on their Macs...

      Let's see

      System 7.5.5 had a help icon

      Where System 1.1 didn't have the same nice "?" icon. I have no urls to screenshots for any system between 1 and 7.

      OS/2 2.20 offered a desktop help icon.

  48. Time to call your broker by iamacat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the most popular word processor can be shut down because of a help icon, it's obvious that any innovators in US and Japan will be sued into oblivion by no-longer innovative companies that wish to maintain status quo. Other countries that don't recognize software patents will write superior, cheaper programs and non-software US businesses will eventually lobby their way into buying them despite patent violations. Remember the thing about outsourcing and foreign sweatshops?

    Time to sell AMZN and MSFT. They are protecting themselves to death.

  49. Screenshots by randalx · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The dispute centered on the way that a help function works in the Ichitaro and Hanako software. The way the software presents information violates Matsushita patent number 2,803,236...

    Can anybody get a screenshot of what exactly they are arguing over since it's not just an icon?
  50. One missing fact... ok a few by Foo2rama · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What are Japanese patent laws? And what is the actual patent? No one knows either of these things. Japanese law may not have the "Non-obviousness" or "inventive step" clauses that America does. 2nd if it is an issue of an icon being used to access help a simple fine and software patch to remove the icon and change the access to help to something other then a button/icon.

    The Microsoft/Matshusita link is tenuous, what computer hardware/software company has not worked with Microsoft at some point on a collaboritive project? Sony? IBM? DELL? Compaq/HP? Using the logic that was put forth earlier anyone Apple sues could be construed as being motivated from M$...

    Lets see if anyone can get some real info on this. Instead of conjucture from a few short news blurbs that contradict each other.

    --


    ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
    1. Re:One missing fact... ok a few by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 1
      The Microsoft/Matshusita link is tenuous, what computer hardware/software company has not worked with Microsoft at some point on a collaboritive project? Sony? IBM? DELL? Compaq/HP? Using the logic that was put forth earlier anyone Apple sues could be construed as being motivated from M$...


      Let's turn that question around. What company has not worked with Matsushita at some point on a collaborative project?

      Answer: none, because Matsushita is one BIG fish. 340.000 people work for Matsushita....
    2. Re:One missing fact... ok a few by rmccann · · Score: 1

      "What are Japanese patent laws? And what is the actual patent? No one knows either of these things. Japanese law may not have the "Non-obviousness" or "inventive step" clauses that America does" If that was so, then the Japanese patent system would suck, and hence should be renovated.

  51. Context based help. by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

    The first system I used with this facility was RISC OS which was on the Acorn 32 bit RISC computers and was back in 1989. In fact the operating system supports a protocol which allows anyone to replace the standard help application. It was another six years before I saw it on a Windows platform.

    1. Re:Context based help. by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      RISC OS was loosely based on some stuff that was written on the eight-bit beeb, back in the days when if someone used your idea you just thought "Wow, they had the same idea I did! How cool is that?" There may indeed be prior art. The AMX Mouse for the BBC microcomputer came out in about 1984 or 85.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  52. damn panasonic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    i guess they really pushed your button!

  53. Some screenshots of the offending icon by MeridianOnTheLake · · Score: 5, Informative

    Scroll down past the Japanese description and you can see some pics of the offending icon in this link: http://japan.cnet.com/news/biz/story/0,2000050156, 20080442,00.htm

    1. Re:Some screenshots of the offending icon by DCMonkey · · Score: 1

      Now that I see those pictures, I think older versions of MS Office (like Office 95) had this exact feature, though I can't remember if it displayed a tooltip or launched a full help window. Office 2003 doesn't seem to have the button in question anymore, though the stock icon is still available in VS.Net 2003.

      (C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003\Common7\Graphics\bitmaps\OffCtlBr\Small\Color \help.bmp

      for those who have it.)

      --
      DCMonkey
    2. Re:Some screenshots of the offending icon by Tarwn · · Score: 1

      It's not just the icon, it's the functionality. Although if you notice, MS Windows still has the question mark mouse cursor, which in my mind could only be used for the exact same functionality (click an icon, click a GUI element for more info on it). I'm also fairly certain there was plenty of prior art, I just can't remember where I saw this particular funcitonality in the past (though I now I have seen it) :P

      -T

      --
      Whee signature.
    3. Re:Some screenshots of the offending icon by Roguelazer · · Score: 1

      I think what the parent of your post is trying to say, Tarwn, is that it's a stock icon, so any patent on the icon itself shouldn't apply. And I've seen that sort of help behavior since, well, as long as I've been using computers. Look to Macs- they probably had "Context Help" way back when.

    4. Re:Some screenshots of the offending icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks as if Adobe could have a reason to go after them as well; the tabbed device immediately below the bar containing the icon looks just like that which is used in many of Adobe's products.

      Not that it would be any more correct than what Matsushita is doing...

    5. Re:Some screenshots of the offending icon by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      That's because they were in the Apple User Interface guidelines in 1987 (years before the patent was applied for), which are similar to the IBM user interface guidlines (for text output and keyboard) from decades ago. For a more modern example, right click on the desktop of windows xp and bring up properties.

  54. So what's the behaviour? by stutterbug · · Score: 1

    Can someone be a little more clear on what this behaviour actually *is*? I saw this story on NHK news the other night here in Osaka and it looked a whole lot like a standard roll-over tooltip. I'll tell you it sent a chill up my spine thinking that a Japanese court could/would enforce a patent on a rollover tooltip. That would suck, since it would mean either a) the defense of 'prior art' doesn't apply in Japan if it is foreign prior art and b) Japanese companies are free to enforce patents for things they simply copied from non-Japanese companies. I find both to be unlikely.

    The parent post suggests that the two help methods are distinct in some way, but since I don't use either of the products myself, so I have no way to know what it is that this fuss is about.

    1. Re:So what's the behaviour? by BJH · · Score: 1

      Why would that be so unlikely? I sincerely doubt that the US legal system checks prior art in Japan before making decisions in US patent infringement cases, so why should Japan look at foreign prior art?

      If it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander...

    2. Re:So what's the behaviour? by stutterbug · · Score: 1

      No, I also doubt the legal system checks prior art outside the country to issuing a patent, but that doesn't mean that you can't bring up foreign prior art as a defense. Seems to me to be pretty easy to pierce Mastushita's argument by demonstrating prior art from the US (or wherever) since it would demonstrate that Matsushita didn't invent the technology in the first place (again, this is assuming that the rollover tooltip and this technology are the same).

      Whatever you think of them, patents are there ostensibly to protect the people who invested money and time, however minor, in things they actually invented, not to reward squatters who invented nothing but were the first in line at the patents office that day.

  55. Triple damages by Morosoph · · Score: 1

    -- No Text --

    1. Re:Triple damages by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Which is why any lawyer will advise you to pretend patents don't exist until you're actually accused of infringing one.

      If it can be proven that you knew a patent existed you get triple damages. Having a policy of actively avoiding finding out information about them is the only defense.

  56. Boycot Panasonic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject says all. Another example of why patents are evil.

  57. It's a shame by RoLi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    3 news stories and none of them explains what the patent really is about.

    Does anybody know?

    1. Re:It's a shame by zootm · · Score: 1
      3 news stories and none of them explains what the patent really is about. Does anybody know?
      I'm interested in this too. There are literally thousands (or more) of programs infringing this patent if it's as generic as the news post makes it sound.
    2. Re:It's a shame by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      3 news stories and none of them show the icon in question. OK, I'm extrapolating as I only looked at two of the stories.

    3. Re:It's a shame by null+etc. · · Score: 1
      3 news stories and none of them explains what the patent really is about.

      Does anybody know?

      I'm sure it's for a feature that helps encourage competition by being locked up by a single vendor.

    4. Re:It's a shame by patio11 · · Score: 5, Informative
      http://japan.cnet.com/news/biz/story/0,2000050156, 20080442,00.htm

      I'll translate about as much as I can without getting into copyright trouble. The patent includes clicking on one icon displayed somewhere on your console, which attaches a special graphic to your mouse cursor. You then click on another icon or function on your console, and it brings up context-sensitive help. This is specifically distinguished from using context-sensitive help by pressing one special key or icon which is in a constant place, and also from each function embedding an explanation of what it does through other means which do not change the state of the mouse cursor.

      The meat of the story is paragraphy #3, although the three screenshots on the front page are understandable even if you don't read Japanese. Due to quirkiness with derivative works law in Japan, tranlating their captions exactly could potentially lead to a lot of trouble. Suffice it to say that the first screenshot shows the offending icon, the second shows the mouse cursor changing as a result of clicking the icon, and the third shows the result of a second click on a generic interface function (an explanation pops up).

    5. Re:It's a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My translation:

      The patent is "information process device and information process method" (Patent No. 2803236), pantent request was made in October 1989, and registered in 17 July 1998. When clicking on "the 1st icon that describes the icon's purpose", followed by clicking on a second icon, the process describes the purpose of the second icon. It is said to have been a technology for word processors.

      Source

      To me, patent descriptions all seem rather too vague and confusing.

    6. Re:It's a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I first saw this technology on Windows 95. They have the [?] button in the upper right corner of the window of most Control Panel applets. Let's order a stop to the sale of Windows, destroy all their copies, and beat the crap out of Bill Gates just to show that we really mean business.

    7. Re:It's a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost the same as US5,287,448.
      They does not apply this pattent US nor Europe.
      Even if they apply it to US or Eurpe,
      examiner(s) in Europe Pattent Office are enough
      capable to reject Matsushita's nonsense patent.

      Most people think that Matsushita plagiarized
      Machintosh's GUI.

    8. Re:It's a shame by Ark42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, Windows 95, and maybe earlier, have this feature, as part of the OS.

      http://ark42.com/freeimage/ShiftF1help.gif

    9. Re:It's a shame by timjdot · · Score: 1

      I was afraid the legalism in the USA would kill innovation. Looks like Japanese are just as stupid. Oh well, good for Brazil, China, Pakistan, Nigeria, or some other country that fosters innovation.

      I hereby file an antipatent on all ideas that take action one and chain it to action two. Furthermore, I think it is completely possible to extend this idea and chain more actions. Furthermore, I belive any set of actions may be treated as one action and chained to other actions. I antipatent that all chaining can be any relationship from the set of data delete, update, insert, and select as well as other relationships between computer software programs and or data.

      --
      Expect Freedom.
    10. Re:It's a shame by PatientZero · · Score: 1
      My first thought is that Microsoft had Matsushita go after them. For one thing, Microsoft may have licensed the patent and thus had the right to use the technology. But Microsoft has the most to gain by having this Word competitor "destroyed."

      Wouldn't the concept of tool buttons in general be prior art. You click on a "Circle Tool" button and you cursor changes to a +. You then click where you want the circle. It's not to get help, but I think it's stupid to have a different patent for every type of thing you can do in the same way (click tool, cursor changes, use tool).

      *sigh* Oh how I hate software patents.

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    11. Re:It's a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has had balloon help (which is almost exactly what you described, except the event is mouse-over instead of left-click) since the late '80s at least. If this patent was filed before then, it should have expired long since. If this patent was filed after then, then it's obviously not their idea and not subject to a Matsushita patent.

      But then, all I know about Japanese IP laws is that they're designed to weaken foreign competition.

    12. Re:It's a shame by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 2

      Anyone who has a (Japanese) patent on software "modes" should be able to trump this one. Command modes are nearly as old as software. The "infringing" company must not have been able to afford as many lawyers, because the patent registers an idea that is obvious. But then again, I don't know Japanese patent law.

      Just to take stock: software patents give large corporations the power to grind individual developers into paste. Copyright law is beginning to give corporations the power to turn those same guns on their own customers. Both of these facilities have been extended beyond all common sense into weapons for corporations against individuals. All that remains to be done is the creation of law that compels purchase. Not so good.

    13. Re:It's a shame by PatientZero · · Score: 1
      All that remains to be done is the creation of law that compels purchase.

      No need, not when American culture does this so effectively. Christmas and birthday presents, anyone? Commercials via every vector immaginable protected as "free speech."

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    14. Re:It's a shame by True+Grit · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'm really flabbergasted by this. The question mark cursor to find out what another button does, has been around for a very long time, but what I really don't understand is why the only recourse is to destroy the software. WTF? Drop that cursor and use a help option from a right click context menu instead, its easy enough to get around the patent, so why does the entire program have to go away? Anybody know?

    15. Re:It's a shame by patio11 · · Score: 1

      Its not "the whole software". They're being ordered to destroy unsold stocks of their existing (infringing) versions -- they are free to patch, update, and support as normal and can release a new version if they remove the offending feature. The order to destroy unsold infringing product is routine in IP cases (whether trademark, copyright, or patent) and will be stayed until their legal wrangling is completely settled. In the event that they look likely to lose their case, they will probably negotiate a settlement with Matsushita promising to never use the feature again and "grandfather" in their existing versions, in addition to paying restitution. Think of it as a court-ordered limited license agreement.

  58. MOD PARENT UP by rafael_es_son · · Score: 1

    Excellent.

    --
    HAD
  59. More importantly by Rufus88 · · Score: 1

    More importantly, were the infringing features added before the patent was applied for?

  60. What would happen if... by fireman+sam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The "icon" used was in fact the ISO or SI (or whatever) standard glyph for "information". You know the one, the white lower case 'i' on a blue background. It isn't help, it is information. Therefore it isn't a help button.

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  61. Hmm. by jcuervo · · Score: 1

    I wonder if "$" is patented.

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    1. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is, your'e up shit creek! /Me

  62. at first glance by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

    At first glance this is just hilarious. A patent on a help icon launching help. Whats next, a home icon launching a file browser to your $HOME directory?

    Then I read the article, which says nothing useful to understand the case. I suppose its cheaper for news orgs to spit out press releases than pay journalists to research the facts.

    Ah, the modern world. We don't have time to read the articles, they don't have time to write them. Is the *information age* making us ignorant?

    --
    ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    1. Re:at first glance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry but I got it as a patent covering activating context help with the mouse.

      I.E click the button now anything you click on shows a popup window wirth hewlp on the item you clicked on.

      but then I actually looked at the article.

  63. MS Word has it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Someone mentioned macos has had this kind of feature for ages.

    With that in mind I fired up the oldest version of MS word i had (on a Mac as it turned out).

    This image shows Word 6 on MacOS with the click then point style help. Word 6 came out in 1994 four years prior to the patent being filed.

  64. Parent is not flamebait by kahei · · Score: 2, Informative



    The above gibberish is not a parody of Japanese. It is an actual Japanese tonguetwister.

    Tokyo -- Tokyo
    tokkyo -- patent
    kyoka-kyoku -- 'permissions office'
    kyou -- today
    kyuukyo -- hurriedly
    kyoka -- permission
    kyakka -- rejection

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:Parent is not flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Exhibit B:

      Anyone who reads Chinese or Japanese can parse the above (that makes maybe 1/10 of the world population). Please restore grandparents karma.

    2. Re:Parent is not flamebait by patio11 · · Score: 1

      Parent is correct in all respects. A Google search shows 800+ uses of the phrase in that exact sequence. You can verify that for yourself, if all the little squiggles mean anything to you ;)

  65. Articre text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Tokyo District Court has suspended the production and sare of a word processing program that is the onry serious competitor in Japan to Microsoft Word. The court arso carred for existing stocks of the program, carred Ichitaro, to be destroyed. Justsystem, which deverops the software, said it prans to appear.

    The court ruring came in a patent dispute brought by Matsushita Erectric Industriar against Justsystem. The suit invorved Ichitaro and a graphics program carred Hanako that is arso sord by Justsystem, according to Matsushita.

    The dispute centered on the way that a herp function works in the Ichitaro and Hanako software. The way the software presents information viorates Matsushita patent number 2,803,236, which was registered with the Japanese patent office in 1998, according to Matsushita.

    On Tuesday, the court granted Matsushita's craim of patent infringement, Matsushita said. Detairs of the ruring wirr be rereased in a few weeks, and Matsushita had no further comment to make at this time, Matsushita spokesman Yoshihiro Kitadeya said on Wednesday.

    Justsystem started serring Ichitaro in August 1985 at the dawn of the personar computer industry in Japan. It sord the first version of Hanako in March 1987. Whire most word processing software is sord preinstarred on PCs, Ichitaro hords 78% of the market in Japan for word processing software sord separatery at retair.

    Justsystem is not taking the court's ruring rying down. It intends to appear the decision -- which arso asks it to pay regar costs -- within two weeks at the Tokyo High Court, says Yoichi Matsumoto, a company spokesman. Justsystem argues that its herp function is based on estabrished technorogies that are not covered by any patent, according to Matsumoto.

    Matsushita decrined to say whether it thinks any other software vendors may be infringing its patent. It arso wourd not say what ricensing terms it was seeking from Justsystem.

    Justsystem has shipped over 18 mirrion units of Ichitaro since 1985. It accounted for about ¥4.8 birrion yen (NZ$65 mirrion), or about 38%, of the company's ¥12.6 birrion in annuar sares in 2004, Matsumoto said.

    Matsushita, which serrs its products under the Panasonic brand, craimed it was forced into regar action with Justsystem after its concerns were repeatedry ignored by the company, Kitadeya said. It first approached Justsystem in 1998, asking that it recognise its patent and agree to pay royarties, but received no response, he said.

    Matsushita then appried for a temporary injunction on the production and sare of Ichitaro and Hanako in November 2002, but withdrew that action in June 2003, he said. In August 2004, Matsushita fired suit again and asked the court for a permanent ban on the production and sare of both software titres, Kitadeya said.

    "We are a grobar enterprise and we are just forrowing internationar practice to enforce our IP rights," Kitadeya said.

  66. You know, I'm getting a bit tired of this by wirefarm · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Clippy" is gone.
    There should never be a need for you to see it ever again.
    I haven't actually seen it in years.

    In fact, the only place I ever hear about it anymore is here on Slashdot, where the merest mention of it seems to garner endless chuckles and mod points.
    Can't we just let the damned, detestable, yet mercifully short-lived abomination fade into obscurity with his ill-conceived yet now mostly forgotten friends "MS Bob" and "MS SQL Server"?

    Dead horse, meet stick.

    Thanks for your kind consideration.

    --
    -- My Weblog.
    1. Re:You know, I'm getting a bit tired of this by afidel · · Score: 3, Informative

      As someone who does a LOT of PC support in addition to my main role as a sysadmin and network designer let me tell you that Clippy (and his often more annoying brothers and sisters) are still alive and well even in Office 2003. YOU may not see them because you or your sysadmin uninstalled him or deactivated him but I can assure you that he's still out there and kicking. Oh yeah and in case you haven't noticed MS SQL Server has a bigger piece of the paid database market then ever. SQL Server 2000 is actually pretty good and from what I've seen of the Beta SQL2005 is going to be even better. It might not be Oracle or DB2 but it's pretty darn good, and it's even affordable =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  67. Nostalgic for 'F1' anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember context sensitive help? You hit F1 and based on the last thing you did/nearest words, it used to guess what help topics you were looking for? What's the point of clippy? All it does is provide an intermediate window for you to type in what you want help in - which is totally useless if you don't know the word for it.

    It's like asking the librarian for assistance and instead of helping you find your book, they just take your request and talk to the real librarian and - you know what it's easier to just call clippy stupid.

  68. Re:Infinges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole point of the parents' post was that the word "infinges" is not a word...

  69. OpenOffice? by interlingua.ro · · Score: 1

    How good is OpenOffice's handling of Japanese? Perhaps Ichitaro can help into establishing it as the platform of choice in Japan.

  70. company doublespeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article: Matsushita, which sells its products under the Panasonic brand, claimed it was forced into legal action with Justsystem after its concerns were repeatedly ignored by the company, Kitadeya said.

    Company doublespeak always sounds a little psychotic, like a guy beating up his girlfriend and then saying "now look what you made me do!!".

  71. Destroy all patents by UlfGabe · · Score: 1

    Destroy all patents.

    Now

    join the monsters from island X and skill them bad. create japenese programs from the ground up, start Open Source efforts at the ground level, im sure japan has the ##'s to do it.

    --
    Check journal for info on Anti-TextBook, an idea by me.
  72. World continues to seek new lows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A help icon? What next. A pixel ? It's not like these companies are poor or something.

    I think really there is a need for some sort of international rethink on patents and similar subjects. It's a complete farce now with companies looking ridiculous all the time with pathetic 'patents' and then arbitrarily trying to enforce them when they feel it is advantageous to do so,

    The patent system is patently a disgrace and a mockery.

    Pathetic.

    1. Re:World continues to seek new lows by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, there is currently an international "rethink" on patents. Right now there is a very strong movement to make software and business patents legal and enforceable. Why? Because business loves 'em like a crack ho loves crack.

      How are you going to compete when help icons are patented? When double clicking is patented? When single clicking is patented? When all of the obvious functions of a computer are patented, only non-obvious, i.e., more difficult means of operations, will be left.

      Once software and business patents are valid throughout the world, technological progress will come to a standstill. The status quo will have no incentive to innovate and any new competition will be rendered illegal.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:World continues to seek new lows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps then this is so serious and invasive it should be treated as an act of occupation, tyranny etc. I'm struggling to find another way to look at it.

    3. Re:World continues to seek new lows by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Software and business patents are so utterly anti-consumer that they should be treated as treason.

      Let's face it, if similar patents would have been valid throughout history, someone would have patented making tires round. Putting rearview mirrors in cars. Selling stuff out of buildings. The assembly line certainly would have been patented.

      Heck, if we go back far enough, someone would have patented the use of fire, eating food, and living in caves!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    4. Re:World continues to seek new lows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should do some looking at patent history. ALL those types of things were patented. The turn of the 19th century saw insane patent flurries just like we have now.

      Somehow we survived and still have cars and movie projectors...

    5. Re:World continues to seek new lows by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      You're wrong. Patent's HAVE changed. First, there are now software patents. Second, there are now business patents. Both of these are new and were NOT available at the turn of the last century.

      A business patent would cover "the business of selling products out of a building." Something like that could not have been done prior to 1998 when the case of State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc., 149 F.3d 1368 (1998) made business patents legal.

      As a real world example of business patents we have the example of the MercExchange patents currently used against Ebay. The patents basically claim a business model where an auction takes place on a network. There is NO technology behind the patent, just a business model.

      Also because of these changes, we have the aforementioned help icon patent. Once again, that never would have occurred until software patents were made valid in the 90s. In the 80s WordPerfect (or Wordstar) could have simply patented word processors killing any competition for 17 years. Now such anti-competitive behavior is possible.

      Patents HAVE changed.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  73. Ichitaro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Tokyo District Court has ordered the destruction of Ichitaro

    For a moment, I thought Ichitaro a city in Japan.

  74. DESTRUCTION?? by dmacleod808 · · Score: 1

    ok, the point of the article, is that all existing stock is destroyed. This is all well and good, but the product will only be off the market till they fix this help system debacle. Hell if it were me id just include a button to open Acrobat with a searchable helpfile...

    --
    There Can Be Only One...
  75. And in related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the ninjas had to kill entire city just because some kid had to jack off.

  76. Tetsuo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kitadeya!

  77. Maybe it's just me. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just me, but isn't the point of patents to protect the little guy from the big evil corporations. If all the patents are just being granted to corporations, is there really any point?

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Maybe it's just me. by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Actually patents were created to protect EVERYONE's invention (including the "big evil" corporation). However, because of the vast sum of money corporations hold, there is pretty little chance for the little guys to hold on to their patent.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  78. Bad Pun by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

    What a culturally insensitive editor.

    ~D

  79. Incompatibility is a (business) feature by ianscot · · Score: 1
    Microsoft seems to make sure the current version of the .doc format won't work in older versions nearly every release... It's pretty sad when software can't even handle it's own proprietary format properly.

    Near as we can tell, this is the only way they have to keep selling upgrades to their office products. Since 1993 or so there hasn't been a new feature in Word that would be a selling point for any sizeable minority, even, of users. That and the lock-stepped OS and Office upgrade thing -- installing W2k? you need Office 2k -- have sold bajillions of licenses on these products when otherwise nobody'd have bothered since Word 5.1a.

    (It would have been interesting to see what a split-up MS would have done about the OS-to-office umbilical. Any OS developer tries to encourage backward compatibility -- except at MS, where they seem to do exactly the opposite as a deliberate business MO.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  80. Oppose that rethink. by Holger+Blasum · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Oppose that rethink. by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      You don't get it. You're wasting your time. Business wants it. Government wants what business wants. And the vast majority of people simply don't care, and never will care.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:Oppose that rethink. by Rattencremesuppe · · Score: 1
      Business wants it. Government wants what business wants.

      That's simply not true. Business not only consists of big corporations, but small / medium enterprises as well. Over here in Europe, the majority of jobs are in small / medium enterprises (AFAIK). That's why politicians at least pretend to represent their interests.

    3. Re:Oppose that rethink. by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope you're right. But big business will never back down on this issue. It's not like they're going to suddenly give up some day.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    4. Re:Oppose that rethink. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately this is the problem. In the end people just roll their eyes and give up and say oh well this is gonna happen and this is how the world is going to change for the worse and we all have to accept it.

      But that's only true because people let it be true.

      Because actually that is where we are headed. On a pro-Linux/OSS site like /. quite honestly I expect people to be more robust and vigourous. Because in the end you know what will happen, someone's going to come along and end it all for everyone and everyone is just going to accept it and shrug their shoulders. I'm not even a big Linux fan, I but I value what it represents and the vital role of OSS overall.

    5. Re:Oppose that rethink. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might've heard this before - "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance". Maybe if we all stopped whining and did something, things wouldn't be so bad?

    6. Re:Oppose that rethink. by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Governments answer to two entities: The electorate and business. It's possible for governments to ignore what business wants if the electorate strongly wants the contrary. But in this case the electorate is utterly ignorant about the issue of software/business patents. No, it's more than ignorance, it is outright apathy. They don't know and they don't care to know.

      Like I've said, I REALLY hope you guys in Europe continue the fight. It's really to your advantage. You'll be the only entity in the world where it'll be legal to create software with a help icon! In other words, you'll be able to innovate while the rest of the world will stagnate.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  81. Plenty of wilderness in the Pilbara and Kimberley by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Or even in the Gascoyne. Plonk yourself down 10km from any road up there and not under any major air routes, and nobody will ever know you're around.

    Keeping yourself supplied with food and water will soon become an issue, however. In some places rain happens two or more years apart on average. In some places out in the middle of the desert proper it basically never happens.

    Oh, one more big tip: don't plonk yourself down on a flood plain or worse still in a creek bed. When it does rain up there, it really rains. None of the sissy stuff that other people call "a torrential downpour". A parched creekbed can become Niagara in about ten seconds and with no warning if it rains upstream.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  82. bah by jerometremblay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Eventually they will go too far and the whole thing will collapse, and we will again be able to do what we want.

    And as things are going, too far might not be very farther.

  83. I own SAVE, but you can use it... by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1

    I own the patent on a SAVE command, but since someone else has the patent on a pull down "File" menu, I just let it slide. You all have my permission to keep saving your files for free!

    --
    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
  84. You'd lose by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    At a trade show last year, we gave away 500 free OO CDs and took down another 200 or so names to have CDs mailed out. We also gave away about 200 free Linux CDs and took down about 50 additional names for those. Linux supposedly (based on stupidly non-representative sales figures) has about 2% of the desktop share and realistically has somewhere between 5% and 10%. Our experience there hints that OO has significantly more marketshare than Linux. If you were to take the ratio as representative (not wise, but nevertheless), OO has somewhere in the vicinity of 15-25% of the market.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:You'd lose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I have to say is that you're living in a fantasy land. There is no way Linux has anything close to a 10% market share, and no way that OpenOffice has anything like 25%. That 2% Linux desktop share is a high estimation, if anything. As for 25% share for OpenOffice, that would mean that there are millions of copies of OpenOffice in use; I'd be surprised if you can find more than 100,000.

  85. Google translation by rworne · · Score: 1

    Hope I got the URL right.

    This link (it appears to be an online petition) describes the problem and shows the offending icon in a banner.

    For the lazy (Google's translation, not mine):
    As for the patent which assumes that it infringed, the help mode as it is called in Ichitaro, in other words " after clicking the idea contest of the specification which is, when it clicks the other idea contest, those where symbol description latter is indicated ". It is no more than functional one which views this frequently to also some appearance for the human who leads to the software, exists everywhere. Help topic indicatory function of the Windows and balloon help function of the MaccOs, are the similar function which is from the time before.

    --
    I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    1. Re:Google translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      English translation by original author.
      --
      by AC at Japan(I buy New version of Ichitaro at Feb 10!)

    2. Re:Google translation by rworne · · Score: 1

      IIRC, when I originally posted this, there was no English translation.

      Thanks anyway.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  86. Not Filipinos, Thais by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    By Thai standards, Filipino dress is almost drab. If a colour doesn't grab you by the eyeballs and wrestle you to the ground, it's not worth wearing.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  87. Office itself is best on OSX by arete · · Score: 1

    I personally tell everyone they should use OOo instead of MSO because it is equal or better - in every case but 1. That one is if you have OSX. Because Office v.X is much sweeter than OOo OR Office for Windows.

    The Mac dev group at Microsoft is the only group to consistently put out software that I think is well done. (IE isn't maintained, now, but it was the best mac browser for a period, too.)

    Ben

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  88. Following International Practice by aminorex · · Score: 1

    Following international practice, I will be boycotting Matsushita products. In practice, this means that when I spec systems they will not be systems including Matsushita drives.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  89. Prior art? by Handpaper · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It looks like there's thirteen years worth of prior art here:

    Justsystem started selling Ichitaro in August 1985

    Matsushita patent number 2,803,236, which was registered with the Japanese patent office in 1998

    Note the article says 'registered' not 'granted', so it would appear that 1998 was the start of the patent process, which makes a submarine patent look unlikely.
    It is possible, however, that the problematic help system was added after 1998, though the article makes no mention of this.

    If somebody has access to the court ruling and can provide a translation, I'm sure things will become a lot clearer.

  90. Ichitaro is definitely in current use by achurch · · Score: 1

    I hate to say it, but this really is a minimal event for the overall market-- no one I know has used Ichitaro for years.

    Maybe you should get around more. I use it myself for some tasks (neither MSWord nor OpenOffice can get vertical writing correct) and I have a number of friends and acquaintances that use it as well. Ichitaro is a minor player, yes, but a significant minor player.

  91. US5,287,448 is prior art against Matsushita patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple Computer has a patent that is almost the same and the first claim including Matsushita's
    patent.

    Apple's patent is the continuation of the patent application appplicated on May 4, 1989.

    Matsushita disgraces itself.
    In Japan, Matsushita Denki is called as
    Maneshita Benki. (It means a mimicking toilet seat).

    A boycott of Matsuhita's products started and
    many people join this boycott campaign.

    http://miuras.net/matsushita.html

    Please join this campaign and whip Matsushita.

  92. Destroy the company? Ain't that a tad extreme? by yeremein · · Score: 1

    Ichitaro had been around for 13 years when Matsushita applied for its help system patent. Presumably (1) this technology is different enough from the standard context-sensitive help that's been around for a decade already, and (2) it was placed in Ichitaro after Matsushita's patent was granted.

    So why not just take the patented technology out? Why order the company destroyed?

    And I though the US patent system was messed up...

  93. *destruction*? by delmoi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All they have to do is take out the help icon and replace it with a menuitem. I'd hardly call that "destruction" (unless they meant the destruction of inventory).

    I hardly think a company would really give up a product like this, most people arn't as lazy as CmdrTaco (who took downhis JavaInvaders game rather then change the name to JInvaders or something to avoid infringing Sun's trademark.)

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  94. filed vs. awarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the patent was actually awarded in 1998 (and thus the year Matsushita first sued), the application was actually filed in 1989.

    Thus, we can assume that either:
    1. MS pays royalties for the feature
    2. MS does not include that feature in Japan
    3. MS uses the feature and has not yet been sued

    aqazaqa

  95. Re:Patents are atheistic by KD5YPT · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um... think what you will. But US has a very lousy and restrictive patent/copyright system.

    Regarding intelligent design...

    Intelligent Design have ZERO solid evidence backing it. While Evolution, on the other hand, are backed heavily by numerous evidences. The only things Creationists/Anti-evolutionists managed to do is doubting the existing evidences supporting Evolution. But in the end, the number is still the same.
    Intelligent Design: 0
    Evolution: At least 1

    Start giving the world proof on Intelligent Design, instead of waving the Bible at them and tell them its the truth.

    Bible is good as a moral guidance, not reliable as a scientific writing.

    --
    In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  96. Re:Patents are atheistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, that guy was either insane or a tool.

    There was no reason to respond in anyway, either they will be to insane to comprehend your logic, or they are laughing their ass off at you right now.

  97. Innovation "No S/w Patents" by cmholm · · Score: 1
    I was afraid the legalism in the USA would kill innovation. Looks like Japanese are just as stupid. Oh well, good for Brazil, China, Pakistan, Nigeria, or some other country that fosters innovation.

    On the chance this isn't a factitious quip: it takes more to foster s/w innovation than pulling goofy patents out of the way. While there may be countries that allow the s/w developer to stretch her wings further than Japan or the US, with the possible exception of Brazil, the list above ain't it.

    From the small business/start-up's POV, they all suffer from elevated degrees of graft, cronism, difficult/no access to capital, crappy local s/w markets, arbitrary application of laws, and nearly worthless court systems.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  98. Monster Island? by kulakovich · · Score: 1


    They also ordered the destruction of Monster Island AND Planet X - and we se where that got them!

  99. Re:Innovation "No S/w Patents" by HiThere · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OTOH, that does mean that any wealthy individual could have software development as a hobby. This is rather analogous to the way writing used to be a hobby among certain of the well-to-do. And, interestingly enough, the writers concentrated on an elegant writing style (however they defined it) rather than on sales (which was considered "crass").

    However, since software is much more easily duplicated than manuscripts are, this would be no bar to it's wide distribution and application. And such people would find the GPL to be no obstacle to their use of it, though some of them might prefer BSD.

    We live in a culture centered around businesses, but don't fall into the fallacy that all activity takes place in that context everywhere.

    OTOH, it's true that the writers of Belles Lettres would generally write at a pace that makes Debian stable look rapid. But not all of them, James Branch Cabel wrote a 7 or 8 volumne series (including the noted Jurgen). Most of them are out of publication, but the writing quality is excellent. A bit staid for modern tastes, but still excellent. (Jurgen could not have been written if he was worried about publication. It was banned in much of the English speaking world for being too ... well, too obvious about what he wasn't saying (i.e. sexual references).

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  100. Re:Innovation "No S/w Patents" by timjdot · · Score: 1

    I agree that dishonesty means business cannot be reliably conducted. Honesty has probably been the leading benefactor of US progress. Yet, parading a Corporate Aristocracy as a Democracy belies the failure of the US system. The patent process is 100% geared towards Corporate Dominance rather than creation of knowledge. IF I filed a patent in Jan '00 that has yet to be reviewed. Go figure!!! The patent application displays are not featured to expand knowledge but, rather, for use in legal research!

    The USA has a huge head start that the Corporate Overlords are seeking to destroy. Bush increases military spending which is past far out of reason while cutting domestic programs. This is indicative of an Aristocracy and very similar to the polit bureau (sp?) where a small rich minority ran the USSR through the suffering of the masses. The American Dream is prosperity for all, not those that can finegle the patent process and court system. Allowing patents for silly stuff is a step over the cliff and cleary Japan has followed the USA.

    My reason for listing the above countries is they are the predicted future population dominance for the world. What they do will determine to a great degree what the future looks like. Clearly a world like China, Pakistan, or Nigeria is much worse than a world like the USA; yet, the USA is much more like China WRT human rights today than it was in the 80's for instance. We are becoming what a communist country is in practice: a controlling elite that uses government to remove rights and restrict the populace. Taking a quick read of the Constitution of the United States of America reveals the federal government has over-stepped the agreement and is in breach of contract. Where does this leave the States and people with who the contract was made? Still paying taxes and losing human rights.

    TimJowers

    --
    Expect Freedom.
  101. Not just Word by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1

    I recently had to use OpenOffice.org to open an older PowerPoint presentation because my newer version of PowerPoint chose not to open it. I phrase it that way because PP2003 was quite capable of displaying the preview of the presentation in the File|Open dialog, but would not open the presentation for editing or display. OOo to the rescue.

  102. No!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But forgery is illegal! Damn those Microsoft DEMONS!

  103. Re:Innovation "No S/w Patents" by cmholm · · Score: 1
    The USA has a huge head start that the Corporate Overlords are seeking to destroy.

    I'll agree with most of what you've said while splitting hairs on this detail: I don't think they're seeking to destroy it so much as they've elected to cash it in for a short term gain. Whether they realise the likely consequences of what they do, I can't say.

    As for the population = destiny argument, the US is due for a half billion souls by '50, so unless the other players manage to pull up their per capta GDP and get a handle on some of their cultural (Pakistan) and demographic (China) issues, their influence by sheer numbers will be a bit limited... barring the US elites not fscking up their own country too badly in the meantime.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  104. Matsushita = Panasonic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you didn't realise...

  105. there's a patition site on this. by translator · · Score: 1

    they've got a brief explanation of background from the user's
    point-of-view :-)

    http://miuras.net/en/matsushita.html/

    i was intrigued by the fact that lots of people who aren't using
    Ichitaro have signed the petition (you can read their comments
    there, in japanease though!).

  106. Music to my ears by KarmaBlackballed · · Score: 1

    The group REM had a hit song long while back that I can imagine being sung like this...

    Technical Chorus:
    It's the end of the world as we know it;
    It's the end of the world as we know it;
    It's the end of the world as we know it.

    Lawyer Chorus:
    And I feel fine!

    (Personally I would rather have the lawyers losing their religion.)

    --

    --- -- - -
    Give me LIBERTY, or give me a check.
  107. Petition Site made by a Japanese non-Ichitaro-user by translator · · Score: 1

    there's a petition site on this.

    http://miuras.net/en/matsushita.html/

    i was intrigued by the fact that lots of people who aren't using
    Ichitaro have signed the petition (you can read their comments)

    what i would love to know is, why Panasonic haven't even made
    a single comment, nor announcement to their customers,
    on web, by press release, whatever.
    given the press coverage, it seems rather unnatural to me!

  108. Elevator Manufacturers owe Japan Billions $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm,

    The Help button has been around for a LONG time,
    how can they patent a call for help?

  109. Matsushita by westlake · · Score: 1
    Man, Bill Gates is to Slashdotters what Satan is to the evangelicals- this all powerful, ubiquitous incarnation of darkness, whom all evil acts in the world can be blamed on

    Does anyone here have the foggiest notion of how big Matsushita is? $22 billion U.S. in third-quarter sales. Matsushita Reports Gains in Third Quarter The cartel doesn't need Bill Gates to decide where its interests lie.

  110. It would be nice if someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    leaked the sources before they light the fire ;)

    if the product is destroyed, who the fuck will be able to tell this code used to belong to this product? :)

  111. Boycott against Panasonic/Matsushita by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://miuras.net/en/matsushita.html

    Some people in Japan has joined it.