Slashdot Mirror


Nokia To Use Microsoft Digital Music Software

BCMM writes "From an article on Reuters: 'The world's largest mobile phone maker, Nokia, and software giant Microsoft struck a deal on Monday to make it easier for consumers to buy digital music on-line and play it back on their handsets ... Nokia agreed to put Microsoft's music player software into its handsets.'" (The BBC covers the deal as well.) "The articles don't mention what sort of DRM or licensing will be involved." jfanning writes "Two new Series 60 phones were also announced that ship soon and support WMA, the 6680 and 6681. I haven't seen it mentioned clearly yet, but also the Media Transfer Protocol has been licenced, so that could mean the phone will show up as a media device in Windows Media 10." jfanning mentions also that Nokia has licensed the Microsoft Exchange Server ActiveSync protocol for business phones.

180 comments

  1. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    SonyEriccsson reported sales increases of its handsets rose

    1. Re:In other news by coolcold · · Score: 1
      SonyEriccsson reported sales increases of its handsets rose

      Apart from 6680 and 6681
      --
      I am harvesting funny/good quotes. Please help by putting them in your sigs :)
    2. Re:In other news by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
      SonyEriccsson reported sales increases of its handsets rose

      Wow! The sales increased, and THEN the "sales increases" themselves rose? That would definately fall into the catagory of DoublePlusGood(TM).

    3. Re:In other news by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Granted it was most likely a mistake, but it's not unusual to report on both the first and second derivatives of things like sales (assume S = unit sales, S' = increase/decrease in unit sales, S'' is the rate at which S' is changing). In fact the second derivative is far more interesting, because if your absolute unit sales are increasing but the rate of increase is busy slowing down (i.e. S'' is negative), you will not see this important harbinger until it's too late (i.e. until S' goes negative) if you only look at the first derivative. S' can tell you where you are in the market, S'' tells you where you're going.

      (Using the wrong derivative is a common way to "lie with statistics" or to incorrectly evaluate situations. E.g. people who want to ban violent computer games may point to "increased incarceration (I) for violent crimes" (positive first derivative I') as if to demonstrate rising violent crime linked to games, however I'' has been negative for many years now. People get confused between "rate of increase/decrease" and "rate of change of increase/decrease".)

  2. Yay! WMA on my phone! by Augusto · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can unwittingly download the latest spyware!

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Yay! WMA on my phone! by donbrock · · Score: 0, Funny

      Luckily, I have a Samsung.

    2. Re:Yay! WMA on my phone! by plover · · Score: 3, Funny
      Not in Europe. The EU is likely to force them to ship WiMP-free phones.

      They'll probably be marketed as "Microsoft Reduced Ring-Tone Phones"

      --
      John
    3. Re:Yay! WMA on my phone! by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Heh... Samsung makes WINDOWS-BASED cell phones ;-)

    4. Re:Yay! WMA on my phone! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      Not all of 'em.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    5. Re:Yay! WMA on my phone! by Salvo · · Score: 1

      You can already do that with 60-series Nokias, Well, you can get Viruses anyway.
      http://slashdot.org/articles/04/08/11/163 205.shtml ?tid=172

  3. OGG still sounds better... by zev1983 · · Score: 1

    And DRM still sucks.

    1. Re:OGG still sounds better... by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      And carbs are better for you than fat. Yet, loook at the "carbs are bad for you, eat grilled crap" diet.

  4. Motorola & Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Make it easier for consumers to buy digital music on-line and play it back on their handsets?

    Somehow I doubt it will be easier than iTunes, and since Motorola allready teamed up with Apple's iTunes...

    1. Re:Motorola & Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understand it--and I may be wrong--iTunes on Motorola phones will not support iTunes Music Store. Thus, you won't be able to buy music on the phone. It's only for playback.

      It's that whole digital hub thing. Can you imagine trying to condense all the info from iTMS onto a 320 x 240 display?

  5. Re:FP valentines day hihi by dextroz · · Score: 0
    Yo! And happy us too!

    With MS security, that much time is saved till a crack turns up :->

    --
    Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
  6. Where's my stream? by EspressoMachine · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I want my mobile to be able to stream music. And for that matter, I also want my car stereo to be able to receive streaming audio. Downloading is so yesterday, who wants to pay per song? As a Rhapsody subscriber, I'd love to access my playlists through my phone or my car - Get on it, guys!

    --
    Despite conventional wisdom, I've discovered you can blame a guy for trying. It's called "attempted murder".
    1. Re:Where's my stream? by emars · · Score: 1

      I totally agree.. To some extent you CAN stream to certain cellphones now, such as ones that can run Real Player (I believe) from Nokia. Also, the Treo 600 can stream SHOUTcast. I've never had one of these devices to try it for myself, but I think it's possible.

      I set up my own SHOUTcast server over my crappy DSL and use it to stream all my music so I can listen at work... I (and others) can request songs over instant messenger.. I would love to be able to listen to my shizznit in the car or anywhere using my phone. Sign me up.

      --
      ...18...19...20 Submit
    2. Re:Where's my stream? by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      umts + laptop and you'll have it(or whatever it is thats the fastspeed network where you live).

      or just edge.

      and just the phone if you do some creative coding(s60 is open so far after all for you, me and anybody to write on).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Where's my stream? by javaxman · · Score: 2, Informative
      I want my mobile to be able to stream music

      As much as they'd like to be able to eventually sell this service, I'm not sure most cell phone companies want you to stay on the phone _quite_ so constantly. Their networks depend on the fact that not everyone is using their phones at once. A single cell tower can support only so many callers. Ever try to make a call in an area where you know you can get service and not be able to connect? Until that problem goes away, you won't see the streaming service... not from the carriers, anyway.

      They are working on it, of course... eventually, as long as folks lobbying against cell tower density don't get their way...

    4. Re:Where's my stream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I have noticed is that Slashdotters haven't really kept up with the advances in the Microsoft world. Microsoft Smartphones have been able to stream audio and video using Windows Media Player for at least two years now. Contrary to someone else wrote in this thread, the carriers encourage it. More music means more data accounts.

  7. Interesting by Joshua53077 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It does make sense that the media companies (i.e. MS, Apple, Napster, etc.) are trying to lock up license agreements with cell phone makers but why wouldn't these companies go after the cell phone providers instead? I mean, if Apple came up with an agreement with Verizon to be their exclusive provider of music, wouldn't it force the cell phone makers to engineer apple's DRM and iTunes into their future phones? And put another way, if I were a cell phone carrier, wouldn't I want a piece of the action and the opportunity to control media standards?

    1. Re:Interesting by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      Oh great, you've given them ideas now. Next thing you know, the provider will call you, put you on hold (listening to music that you must pay for), and you won't be able to hang up!

      Thanks a lot.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:Interesting by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      >I mean, if Apple came up with an agreement with Verizon to be their exclusive provider of music

      Why would Verizon want to sign such an agreement with **Apple**? Cut out the middleman, I says.

      >wouldn't it force the cell phone makers to engineer apple's DRM and iTunes into their future phones?

      That seems to be likely and that is why Verizon wouldn't want to have Apple as an exclusive provider - that would automatically make all of their (multimedia-capable) phones more expensive (for the amount of royalties given to Apple and Apple's cut on each and every song sold/rented/streamed).

      > if I were a cell phone carrier, wouldn't I want a piece of the action and the opportunity to control media standards?

      It's of course very attractive but at the same time it's expensive to play such games.... If you screw up, say goodbye to hundreds of millions of dollars.
      Carriers are already in deep shite with all those billions sunk on stupid 3G licenses that will have been rendered almost useless by Wi-Max, WLAN, Skype and such...

    3. Re:Interesting by eseiat · · Score: 1
      Why would Verizon want to sign such an agreement with **Apple**? Cut out the middleman, I says.

      While it would seem to make more sense for a company like Verizon to go straight to the source for the music, it would also be easier and more lucrative to utilize someone like Apple or Napster or Microsoft, who already have licenses with all the major and a good deal of the minor records labels, for their services. It's all about marketing and when consumers think of online music purchases they are immediately drawn to a branded name such as iTunes or Napster, not to the record label since that is not the type of marketing that the record label itself is looking for in the public image.

      Record labels make all their money by promoting an artist, who might flaunt their label a bit, but they predominantly stay back in the shadows.

    4. Re:Interesting by SuperBigGulp · · Score: 1
      why wouldn't these companies go after the cell phone providers instead?

      I think the reason you don't see more of this is that there have been similar mergers that worked out poorly for all involved. I think IBM & Rolm may be the most relevant example, although the whole Time Warner/AOL/Turner fiasco is similar. Qualcomm used to make a Palm-based smartphone and sold it to Kyocera, and I don't think it has been heard from since.

      I'm not saying it wouldn't be a good idea for Apple or others to try this, but I think there is such a poor track record of mergers among companies that tried to get into the hardware telephony business that this would be a tough sell.

      --
      Someday a Slashdot ID of 177180 will mean something.
    5. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  8. Crashes.... by FalconZero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nokia is a type of PHONE
    T-Mobile is a type of NETWORK
    Sheessh - If you're gonna make up random things to get FP, at least make them vaugley techincally correct.

    Anyway... As for Nokia - The rest of my devices running MS stuff crash - Why Oh Why would I want my phone to crash as well??? I can just see it now. "Hello Bob, I need you to look up error code 61023... Bob? Bob?... damn - my phone's rebooted."

    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    1. Re:Crashes.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why Oh Why would I want my phone to crash as well???
      I've never have a Nokia phone crash but Motorola phones crash all the time. I had a 720i that locked up about once a month. I now have a v600 that also locks up a lot. The only way to fix it is to remove the battery and put it back in.
    2. Re:Crashes.... by SteveX · · Score: 1

      I had a Nokia 3650 that crashed on me every few days.

    3. Re:Crashes.... by don.g · · Score: 1

      Well, actually:

      Nokia is one of many manufacturers of phones
      T-Mobile owns a GSM cellular network in the US (and presumably more elsewhere)

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    4. Re:Crashes.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. My Nokia 3650 crashes much more than windows!!

      Stupid Symbian... :(

    5. Re:Crashes.... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      well,extra actually, T-mobile is part of Deutsch Telekom AG. and they operate the gsm network in the us. I think they lease use on the infrastructure.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    6. Re:Crashes.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you laugh, but I'm working on the CDMA version of that phone, and well .... first time I ever saw a BSOD on a phone.

  9. In Other News... by bigtallmofo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Motorola has announced that they have signed a deal with Microsoft to implement the stunningly successful Microsoft Bob into their new line of phones.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:In Other News... by eobanb · · Score: 1

      Great! So I can open the closet door to dial a 1, talk to the puppy to dial a 2... ...this sounds pretty promising to me.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:In Other News... by leonmergen · · Score: 1

      Motorola has announced that they have signed a deal with Microsoft to implement the stunningly successful Microsoft Bob into their new line of phones.

      Doesn't Motorola use open-source software to power most of their phones, and I wonder wether Microsoft will adapt its software for it ?

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
  10. Because after all, we all love... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Insightful
    > struck a deal on Monday to make it easier for consumers to buy digital music on-line and play it back on their handsets ...

    ...aah, in rapture to Beethoven's Ninth, compressed to a 32kbps mono .WMV, gloriously rendered on a tinny piezoelectric speaker.

    Turning phones into music rental devices seems to fall under the "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" category.

    Even if you stuck a headphone jack into your phone to get around the shitty piezo speaker problem, consider that if you actually plan to use your phone for something (oh, I don't know, say, talking on it?), why would you want to wear down its battery by playing music on it?

    1. Re:Because after all, we all love... by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      There's this neat thing called a "battery charger" that comes with most phones. The battery life of most mobile phones is more than sufficient for most people (meaning the length of time they do not have access to their charger). Why not not make something you carry most of the time more useful?

      I use my mobile phone to play music when I go to the gym. This way I only have one thing to deal with instead of having to deal with a seperate music player.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    2. Re:Because after all, we all love... by ad0gg · · Score: 1
      Turning phones into music rental devices seems to fall under the "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" category.

      I bet you said the same thing about cameras in phones. The market is now consoldating personal gadgets, we got phones, cameras(now even decent cameras), pdas combining together. There's alreay phones on the market that can accept flash cards and play mp3s, combine that the dropping price of flash storage and you have a good market.

      BTW. There's a few services that you "rent" music that are doing very very well. Have you heard of XM and Sirius? People paying $10 to $13 for the right to recieve broadcasted songs. People are willing to pay for the right to listen to music something slashbotters haven't come to grasp yet.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    3. Re:Because after all, we all love... by tongue · · Score: 3, Informative


      Even if you stuck a headphone jack into your phone to get around the shitty piezo speaker problem, consider that if you actually plan to use your phone for something (oh, I don't know, say, talking on it?), why would you want to wear down its battery by playing music on it?


      Yeah, actually, not only would i, but I've been screaming for the ability to do so for years. Now I can stick a miniSD card into my cell phone and have a small "emergency supply" of music on hand whenever I need it, without having to carry around an extra gadget. And not only can I play Beethoven's 9th in 32kb mono wma, but also in 192kb vorbis, 128kb wma, and anything in between if i so choose. Not to mention the ability to put videos on my phone--now if i can just get tivo to let me store as wm10 content i can watch 24 on my phone as well.

      As for the charging, the engineers made a very wise decision in allowing the phone to charge over USB, so when i hook it up to sync to my desktop, its also charging for me, which means I only have to carry around a small USB cable instead of a whole charger, and i can charge off anything with a USB port, even if the phone's software isn't installed on the computer. hell, i can even charge off linux. :)

      (for those wondering, the phone in question is the Audiovox SMT5600, not the nokias mentioned above, but the same principles apply.)

    4. Re:Because after all, we all love... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my phone battery life is fine too, as long as I don't actually talk on the phone. If I actually use the phone much, then I need to recharge it.

      WTF is the point of having something that's "mobile" if you have to drag around a battery charger just to use it? The last thing I need is a phone that's dead after 1 day just because I forgot to put it on the charger for one night. Or worse, dies just before I need to make a call because I played music on it all day at work.

      Most MP3 players don't have such a problem with battery life, but then again they're a lot bigger than my phone, and consequently have much larger batteries.

      When they finally come up with a solution to the battery life problem, then maybe we can think about combining more functions into one device.

    5. Re:Because after all, we all love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Turning phones into music rental devices seems to fall under the "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" category. "

      Actually yes, it does. MP3 players and phones are both portable, both share a lot of electronic components and are both utilised by the same parts of the body (hands and ears - mouth if you sing along to MP3s, but hey). It makes sense to converge these.

      In fact, it will solve one of my biggest annoyances; why the heck hasn't someone developed a bluetooth headset that works as wired headphones? When an incoming call arrives, it could fade the music out while you talk, and fade it back in afterwards. Perfect!

    6. Re:Because after all, we all love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I actually use the phone much, then I need to recharge it.

      Did it occur to you that it's actually the radio transmission that's sucking power, not the sound production? Given that, time spent playing music should drain the battery much more slowly than time spent talking on the phone.

      Me, I don't even carry a cell phone. I hate the little fuckers.

    7. Re:Because after all, we all love... by skubeedooo · · Score: 4, Interesting
      When I'm listening to my mp3 player, i can't hear my phone ring. And i can't feel it vibrate because it's usually in my bag (i don't like leaving it in my pocket all the time). This obviously causes a problem, because if i'm expecting a call then i have to not listen to music, and if i'm not expecting a call then i'll probably miss it.

      And regarding batteries, i have a charger at home and at work. Most of my friends have nokia phone chargers. If listening to music through my phone reduces the battery to, say, 5 hours, then i probably won't care.

      I find it really bizarre how the slashdot community has so many neo-luddites. Just because this technology is not perfectly set up for how YOU listen to music, or how YOU use your phone, it doesn't mean it isn't good for others. Sometimes i get the feeling that my grandparents are more adaptable to change than the average slashdot reader.

    8. Re:Because after all, we all love... by jridley · · Score: 1

      I bet you said the same thing about cameras in phones.
      I still do say the same thing about cameras in phones. And color screens on phones for that matter.

      I dropped my cellphone contract a few months ago. If I ever have to get one and can't get a phone without all that crap in it, I'll probably just give up and decide I don't really need a phone, anyway.

    9. Re:Because after all, we all love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it really bizarre how the slashdot community has so many neo-luddites.

      I've noticed this too, increasingly ("who needs that"), and I think it is a generation thing. People get stuck with the ideas and habits they grow up with, and defends it against all the silly new things. But is especially funny to watch a place like Slashdot, with so much leet people :) walk into the same trap.

    10. Re:Because after all, we all love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes i get the feeling that my grandparents are more adaptable to change than the average slashdot reader.

      Make that the "average slashdot poster and I would agree with you. There are plenty of intelligent people who just read, don't post.

      Damn, I just excluded myself.

    11. Re:Because after all, we all love... by fleaboy · · Score: 0

      I suppose that if my life was so sorely miserable that living were something I wanted to block out, then I wouldn't move the next time the current marketing machine crapped out their next redundant technology at me. The masses make me grateful every time they defend the system that is laughing at their consumers every time they exclaim "don't think, shut up and buy something"

      --
      Life is a gift. And my Karma couldn't possibly be 'Positive'
    12. Re:Because after all, we all love... by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

      ... Now I can stick a miniSD card into my cell phone and have a small "emergency supply" of music on hand whenever I need it...

      Are you so hard up for music that you need an "emergency supply" with you? ...damn hoss.

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    13. Re:Because after all, we all love... by skubeedooo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well i was thinking that myself, but then i realised that it had been modded +5, so it is at least posters and modders.

    14. Re:Because after all, we all love... by fleaboy · · Score: 0

      Hey you! Up on the mount, afraid to post with your name? That afraid to stand up for what you believe in? If I were like you I would have committed suicide long ago. Have a nice day-anonomous COWARD

      --
      Life is a gift. And my Karma couldn't possibly be 'Positive'
    15. Re:Because after all, we all love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now if i can just get tivo to let me store as wm10 content i can watch 24 on my phone as well

      i just use .mpg right now, all the 8/900 sony erriccsons support mpg2/4 (presume the MS devices do too) or this tool rips them down to size (or straight off the DVD), the p900-910i supports 1gb mem sticks too, so room for a few vids and some mp3's (can you wait for the HD version mmm :)

      video and mp3's, everybody (crapGRPRS,iMode,3G,4G) is doing it, the only thing that sucks is the quality (its not the best of fun viewing 2" movies at 15+-fps) and battery life is harsh but technology is bound to improve those

      -AJ

    16. Re:Because after all, we all love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I ever have to get one and can't get a phone without all that crap in it, I'll probably just give up

      I finally bit the bullet and got a cell a couple years ago, I was able to get (at no additional cost) a basic, no-frills phone thrown in with my plan.

    17. Re:Because after all, we all love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to rage against the machine, dude. You sure showed us.

    18. Re:Because after all, we all love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa dude. Struck a nerve there, eh?

    19. Re:Because after all, we all love... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Did it occur to you that it's actually the radio transmission that's sucking power, not the sound production? Given that, time spent playing music should drain the battery much more slowly than time spent talking on the phone.

      Yes, of course. That's also why, when you take your phone into an area that has absolutely no cell towers at all, the phone will burn up the battery really fast because it's transmitting at full power, trying to find a tower. So you have to remember to turn off your phone when you go out in the woods.

      But while playing music probably won't take as much power as transmitting, it'll certainly take more power than just sitting idle. MP3 decoders require power, and worse, if the phone is using the CPU to decode the MP3s, instead of a hardware decoder, it'll greatly impact battery life. On top of that, if the phone is to have any decent capacity at all, it'll need a hard drive, which will take a lot of power.

      Me, I don't even carry a cell phone. I hate the little fuckers.

      What, you'd prefer to pay more money for landline service? Even if you just leave your cellphone at home, it's still a lot cheaper than a landline.

    20. Re:Because after all, we all love... by alexislashdot · · Score: 1

      I also have this phone and I am use it for music and movies. It rocks! Why would anyone want to use a stand alone mp3 player when this one has it all? You need a cell phone anyway.

      People do not believe me that I watch full movies with clear subtitles on this one. They make really big eyes when they see it.

    21. Re:Because after all, we all love... by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1
      They make really big eyes when they see it.

      With the small screens on most mobile phones, I'd need really big eyes to see it.

    22. Re:Because after all, we all love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh ... I neither need a cell phone, nor have I ever wanted one for any purpose other than as a Bluetooth modem to let me browse the 'net from almost any metropolitan area, even without WiFi access. Land lines are cheaper. I've got one at home, one at work, and when I'm not in either of those places, I don't want people to be able to reach me.

      As for an MP3 player, I use my iPod. 40 GB of storage for music and files. I actually keep two complete OS disk images on it (NT4 and xp, both for use in virtual machines mostly) along with 4 more ISOs for various useful disks (Knoppix, a custom master of Knoppix, LAS, and PHLAK).

    23. Re:Because after all, we all love... by yotaku · · Score: 1

      now if i can just get tivo to let me store as wm10 content i can watch 24 on my phone as well

      If you get a Microsoft Media Center, you can just go into windows media player 10, and it'll detect the phone, find your tv shows, and then you just tell it to copy them to the phone and it'll do all the transcoding for you.
      It's all pretty cool when it just all works together. Of course it does require you to have a very MS centric setup.

    24. Re:Because after all, we all love... by spike42 · · Score: 0
      That really, really sounds like an advertisment.

      Not a good advertisment mind you, because a good ad has the words "TCO" and "life of contract" ( goddam pc magazine)

      --
      This sig sucks.
    25. Re:Because after all, we all love... by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      In what way is a cell phone cheaper than a landline? Anyone I know who has service with any of the big providers (Sprint or Verizon - they actually work in upstate NY around Ithaca and also when away at college) pay $50-$60 a month. We pay $27 a month. We use LD via a prepaid calling card at $0.03/min.

      We'd have to talk for 750 minutes long distance to break even with one to break even with a cell phone. That is a lot of LD, and it's anytime minutes if you will. Plus, the quality is better on a landline. Plus, we can also use the internet over that line (dial up is all that is available where we live).

      Even if we were somehow fused to LD calls, for an equal cost to the cell phone, we could get unlimited calling anywhere, anytime. With masses of calling features. I have yet to see any cell plans with straight unlimited access.

      Oh, and the best part with our current setup? Unused LD minutes roll over.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    26. Re:Because after all, we all love... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I just bought Lara St. John Bach stuff from Magnatunes.com , I preferred MP4 (iTunes) as I will finally end up in that format even if I burn wav CD myself.

      I noticed something. There was no selection for WMA even :) Even at 128kbps WMA sounds like tin. Unimaginable lossy in classical stuff even.

      About MP4? Well, later I downloaded FLAC too. Not big difference on my sub $400 system.

  11. People that buy these... by Sheetrock · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Are definitely into it for the gadgetry rather than the purpose. Unfortunately, that serendipity in addition to the average longevity of cellular hardware and batteries in general contributes to a major environmental problem.

    Granted, the manufacturing processes have gotten better, or at least have been outsourced to other countries, but we desparately need to find a way to extend the life of old electronics and recycling components in order to develop a environmentally-safe and sustainable electronic culture.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:People that buy these... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that quote from Yoda? And Spock from Star Trek was never a doctor. Dr. Spock was a child psychologist.

      Either your sig is stunningly brilliant or stupid. I can't decide which.

  12. du-du-du ... dudu! by zaubermantel · · Score: 1

    Just wait till Microsoft trademarks a ringtone that you can't change. Or maybe it will just be Bill Gates cackling like a maniac.

  13. Too much of even a good thing makes you barf. by nomad63 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am talking about consolidation here. You consolidate your PDA with your phone. Fine. It was a wise move not to carry two separate address/phone books. It was vital and trivial decision for the business minded. But Music on my phone at the same time in return for a M$ DRM installed on my phone ? I don't know how'bout you but I do not feel my contacts staying secure after some piece of micro$oft code placed in my phone.
    Obviously this unti is going to be targetted at the college kids but, how many college kids have the money to throw away on DRM'ed song downloading anyway.
    In my opinion, this is going to be another one of Nokia's flops.

    --

    __________
    The more I know people, the more I love animals
    1. Re:Too much of even a good thing makes you barf. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score: +5, Childish "Micro$oft" name calling)

      (Score: +5, Believing that music DRM will infect your contacts list)

    2. Re:Too much of even a good thing makes you barf. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope it will be. I really don't like WMA, especielly DRM-crapped WMA.

    3. Re:Too much of even a good thing makes you barf. by plover · · Score: 1
      I never consolidated -- I carry both a Palm and a cell phone, and have for the last 8 years.

      I watched friends buy every combined device ever made, from the original Qualcomm brick-phone (thing weighed in around a pound) to various Kyoceras, Visorphones, and a couple of other hybrid things. One of my buddies went through three separate devices trying to find one that worked well. He's now back to a Verizon phone (with crippled bluetooth support) and a Palm Tungsten T3.

      The problem is the form factor of an ideal PDA simply is not congruent to the form factor of an ideal phone. I never want to hold a giant Palm to my ear, nor do I ever want a tiny, oil-smeared screen in my hand. If my Palm usage was more occasional, then I'd consider a combined device, but I spend lots of time each day on both devices, so a compromise is uncomfortable.

      If you look at it that way the question then becomes: which device to use for music? For me personally, it's neither because I don't want to carry around Yet Another Electronic Thing (namely headphones.) Since I don't have a public-transit commute, I have music in my vehicle and at my desk so it's not a big deal for me. If I had to pick, I suppose I'd pick my Tungsten T simply because it already supports MP3 playing. However, what I really don't need is another usage draining either device's battery -- I'm already about two or three days between charges, which is a lot more frequent than I want. That was actually the biggest drawback I saw purchasing my Tungsten -- I hate built-in rechargeable batteries. They never have adequate power reserves.

      --
      John
  14. Now... by CapnGrunge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Clueless cellphone users will add to clueless computer users for us to deal with.

    --
    I see 57005 people
    1. Re:Now... by network23 · · Score: 1

      Even worse - clueless cellphone operators will now suck Microsoft ass worse than big company IT managers.

      I can't believe Nokia is doing this. What a bunch of fucking loosers. Their business is down the drain and new models are made by their new and clueless Dilbertian middle-management MBA-wannabees.

      My next phone will be a Sony Ericsson K600 just to protest.

  15. Microsoft? Open Standards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Microsoft will introduce open standards for digital music compression and piracy protection in its Media Players for personal computers

    HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! (sniff - wipes tears from eyes)
    Microsoft supporting open standards. (snort) Now, that's funny!

  16. Do I get a refund by sulli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if I just keep the damn thing on vibrate all the time? I hate those )(@#&@!#@!#& ringtones.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  17. Missing Sync by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Palm also licensed the MS ActiveSync (Outlook/Exchange protocol). Now Nokia. How does an open source project, like Open-Xchange, license a product like that? Beyond the legal issues of GPL on software that depends on a (very) proprietary license (which can be overcome by partitioning the licensed SW over IPC APIs), how does the project negotiate with MS, and be trusted to honor the agreement? How to pay? If this is all doable, what are we waiting for?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  18. Re:FP valentines day hihi by Mr.Mysteriosity · · Score: 0, Redundant

    T-Moblie = Carrier
    Nokia = Cell Phone Manufacturer.

    Happy Valentines to you too baby ;-*

  19. big freagin deal by fribhey · · Score: 1

    i stopped using nokia a long time ago because of their craptastic phones. maybe that's why microsoft struck a deal with them, now when the software crashed they can just blame nokia.

    --
    / http://suffocate.us
    / http://johngrayson.com
  20. Monkey Boy by gandell · · Score: 1
    Nah...

    I'd rather have the audio from the Monkey Boy Dance playing when someone annoying calls me. "Give it up for me!"

    --
    Mercy was given to me by Christ...I must give the same to others.
  21. It's not just Microsoft doing this by Buran · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... and why doesn't the story reflect that? Motorola reportedly showed off their new iTunes-compatible phone today, too!

    The dirt on the Motorola E1060 - Engadget - www.engadget.com

    1. Re:It's not just Microsoft doing this by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ, that's ugly. What on Earth was Apple thinking? Or is Motorola out to screw them again?

    2. Re:It's not just Microsoft doing this by Buran · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know too! I was expecting something either silver or white... of course, like they say, we're not 100% sure that's the iPhone.

      Me, I'm getting a Treo when I buy my new phone (which will be real soon, as my current one is starting to mess up more, and it's old). I don't use my cellphone as a jukebox.

      BTW, I usually hate free(x) sigs, as my own sig, as of this posting, indicates, but yours made me laugh. Good work!

  22. the only way i'd even consider it by fishyfool · · Score: 1

    is if i could stream my Phone Music to my car stereo while it was on the car charger via radio waves.

    --
    Enjoy Every Sandwich
  23. Well, yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, who else is aggressively trying to sell themselves in this area? Besides Microsoft there really aren't any alternatives. I mean, there's MPEG4, the MPEG4 vendors are still stuck back in the dark ages where consumer devices were built with the interests of consumers in mind, not the interests of large media companies, so no one's interested; and Microsoft's got a lot of cash from other areas to throw into beating MPEG4 in readiness to market, whereas MPEG4 companies have to survive off their own money, so they've been stuck at the speed of capitalism (slow).

    Microsoft is going to continue to snap up every single contract in this area until there's nothing left to snap up because there's no one else to buy from.

    I realize what Apple thinks they're doing in not trying to market Quicktime+Fairplay, but in reality all they're doing is allowing Microsoft to fence them in to an "iPods and nothing else" niche while soon, if you are anyone but Apple and you want to sell a device that works with audio or video, you will have to pay a tithing to Microsoft for their codecs.

    1. Re:Well, yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I mean, who else is aggressively trying to sell themselves in this area?

      From The Register:
      RealNetworks has relaxed commercial license terms to encourage more device makers to support its technology, which would in turn widen the potential customer-base for its content services. [...] RealNetworks hopes that device makers and their software development partners will continue to take the single package. Nokia, for instance, this week upgraded its licence to take in Helix DNA Player, ensuring future Series 60 and Series 80 phones will play a range of audio and video content - not just the RealVideo material that the likes of the 6600 can only handle today.
  24. Well my other idea was... by Joshua53077 · · Score: 3, Funny

    a huge 80's style boom box/cell phone that the kids could carry on their shoulders and they could blast their newly purchased music or their phone call, so be thankful I only floated the first idea. :-P

  25. Drivers and Drivers by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Funny

    *Press One to Download Drivers*
    Beeep
    *Press Two to sync device with server*
    Meeep
    *Look up to avoid crashing into large truck*
    Yaaaaaaagggh!
    *crunch*

    1. Re:Drivers and Drivers by Angostura · · Score: 1

      Made me laugh. Thanks

    2. Re:Drivers and Drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Automated voice from phone) You have pressed an incorrect key. Please try again.

  26. Spywares by michelcultivo · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I go to download there will be that screen asking me to click on "Yes" to install the application? Yeah, that application signed by Verisign :)

  27. Prayers answered by Badly+Configured · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Finally something sensible. I refuse to buy yet another computer (Mac) download music and carry yet another gadget (iPod) to play it. But if I can use the existing PC and the phone that I would carry anyway for the same purposes, I'm ready to stop inserting CDs into the stereo and join the downloading mania.

    The same goes for the Exchange-Nokia integration. My mail happens to be on Exchange (at home too, so flame me) and I should be able to access my calendar, address book and mail from the one mobile device that I have in my pocket. There is no way I would carry around another paperweight (Blackberry) for this, and anything that does not update appointments on the go is totally useless.

    Yes, it is two evil corporations getting together but it is what I have prayed for.

    1. Re:Prayers answered by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      You need a stand alone computer to download music too then sync it to an iPod? The one I use to do everything else works for this feature just fine, and isn't limited to the Mac platform though that is my platform of choice at the moment and for teh forseeable future.

      I guess my concern is battery life. All these extra gidgets on my phone make the battery shorter because of all the gizmos. Something has to power up the storage in the phone whether I use it or not, and has to power the fancier sound speaker that is 100s of times better than the phone system that carries my signal.

      I don't mean to sound like a grumpy old man here but the rush to converge everything without improving the power consumption/storage device just makes me that much more reliant on standing next to a pillar in an airport fending off other for the one power outlet within 500 ft.

      I mean the iPod has a 40GB drive in my latest model and I can't get anywhere near the 12 hours it advertised (sometimes I wonder if it is 12 hours frmo when you unplug it from the charger whether you use it or not) but then most of my songs are around 224 AAC instead of 128 AAC so maybe that has something to do with the battery life.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    2. Re:Prayers answered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iTunes is available for Windows, too, you know.

      Apple doesn't offer anything like Exchange, but I'm told by Apple fanboys that Micro$uck Exchange is teh suck adn IMAP is teh bettar so I don't expect them to match Exchange with anything.

    3. Re:Prayers answered by MoonBuggy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why would you need to buy another computer? iTunes and iPods work fine on Windows or reasonably well on Linux. Fair enough if you don't want to buy an iPod - why not just rip the songs to MP3 and put them on your phone? Then you don't need to go paying again for music you own. If you really want to pay for downloads rather than hard copies you can also use hymn to strip the DRM from legally purchased iTunes songs which can then be used with any standard FairPlay-incapable MP4 software that'll run on Symbian on your phone, without any restriction hassle.

      I'd like to know if there's anything I've missed here, but if I were you I wouldn't be giving my money or approval to a big evil setup designed to make the big bosses richer while giving you less rights.

    4. Re:Prayers answered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably want to look into a Windows Mobile smartphone. Microsoft knows thats what a lot of people want, so their product is geared towards synching with Outlook (either over the air, or via a desktop).

      Unlike what you hear around here, Microsoft knows what they are doing.

    5. Re:Prayers answered by SlightlyOldGuy · · Score: 1

      "My mail happens to be on Exchange (at home too,so flame me)"
      OK, I'll bite. Is your Exchange server properly licenced and paid for?

  28. Duh by dsmitchell1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your car already has streaming audio. It's called radio!

    1. Re:Duh by EspressoMachine · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You still listen to radio?

      Given the choice between Clear Channel's playlist and my own, I think I'll take mine, but thanks anyway.

      --
      Despite conventional wisdom, I've discovered you can blame a guy for trying. It's called "attempted murder".
    2. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know which is worse. Buffering...buffering...buffering or commercials and the same 20 songs all the time.

    3. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Anger leads to Hate, Hate leads to Buffering.

  29. Cellphone rage by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Alex: No. No! NO! Stop it! Stop it, please! I beg you! This is sin! This is sin! This is sin! It's a sin, it's a sin, it's a sin!

    Dr. Brodsky: Sin? What's all this about sin?

    Alex: That! Using Ludwig van like that! He did no harm to anyone. Beethoven just wrote music!


    And "La Cucaracha" in polyphonic clarity!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  30. The Meme to Propogate by ewhac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nokia recognized that phones are not exactly what you'd call "high-end audiophile" equipment. Further, there is a lot of downward price pressure on phone manufacturing costs (mostly from the service providers, whose heavy discounts on phone handsets are easily noticed on their books by Wall Street analysts). Hence, you're not likely to see quality audio coming out of a phone soon, since few organizations will be willing to pay the extra engineering and manufacturing costs to put that quality into the phone in the first place.

    So, realizing this, Nokia understood that putting in support for AAC or MP3-Pro or Ogg Vorbis or any other high-quality audio standard was fairly pointless, since phones are physically incapable of reproducing their dynamic range. They wanted an audio format equal to the platform on which it would be running. Hence, Windows Media.

    Everyone knows Windows Media looks and sounds very poor but, on a cheap phone with low-quality sound hardware, you'd never be able to tell. So Windows Media is the obvious choice for "toy" audio applications.

    If you want quality audio, however, then you'll have to get a decent piece of audio hardware that supports quality codecs.

    Schwab

    1. Re:The Meme to Propogate by LourensV · · Score: 1

      But people care much more for popularity than for quality. They'd rather have the latest Britney Spears in DRMmed mono WMV than $unknown_band's latest in unencumbered 4-channel Ogg Vorbis. And they're not going to get the latest Britney Spears unless her record company trusts the format. Hence, not MP3, and not the evil open source Ogg Vorbis. I bet WMV is cheaper to licence than AAC.

    2. Re:The Meme to Propogate by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      Huh? I can accept criticism for DRM, for proprietariness, for lock-in marketing...but in fair bit-rate-for-bit-rate comparisons I've found WM video and audio to be pretty damn good. And why wouldn't it be? As far as I understand, it's only slightly modified MPEG-4.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    3. Re:The Meme to Propogate by ewhac · · Score: 1

      See the message subject -- I am trying to propogate a meme. In this case, I am trying to build in the minds of readers an association between Windows Media and cheap, toy-like audio quality. If this association can successfully be built, it is considerably less likely that Windows Media will be considered for "serious" or "pro-sumer" audio applications.

      Or, to put it another way:
      MP3, Ogg Vorbis, AAC -- Technics, Denon, Onkyo
      Windows Media -- Radio Shack

      Schwab

    4. Re:The Meme to Propogate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck with that. The only problem is that "memes" dont work so well when they are obviously wrong. Microsoft will eventually have the audio world under their control, along with the cell phone world.

    5. Re:The Meme to Propogate by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      Okay, if that is the course you have chosen, then so be it. But let's be honest what you're really talking about: FUD.

      I find the trend in this community towards an acceptance of blatant mischaracterization and spreading of falsehood to be troubling. This is a community founded on the principles of honestyl, openness, and respect. Are you really ready to sell out these ideals for market share?

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    6. Re:The Meme to Propogate by ewhac · · Score: 1

      We have been upstanding, forthright, honest, open, and respectful. And what has it gotten us? Embedded and desktop platform OEMs are brainlessly flocking to Microsoft's Windows Media and oppressive copy protection "solutions", even though they know that Microsoft is going to screw them. Again.

      The situation in the embedded space is considerably better than in desktop space -- nearly everyone in the embedded sector is studying or actively working on Linux solutions. But even people pursuing Linux are inexplicably lining up in front of Microsoft to buy their codecs and copy protection crap. Now, fast forward four years: Just how do you think embedded OEMs offering non-PocketPC platforms are going to be treated by Microsoft?

      We have a damn fine mousetrap. And yet we're being assiduously ignored. "They" say that engineering quality doesn't matter; it's all to do with image management and marketing. Fine. Maybe it's time we did some image management of our own. 'Cause being consistent, direct, honest, and respectful seems to be getting us laughed at behind our backs.

      *mutter*, *grumble*, *curmudge*,
      Schwab

    7. Re:The Meme to Propogate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      That has got to be the single stupidest post yet. Current Nokia high-end models already support MP3, AAC (built-in) and OGG Vorbis (with a plugin) playback at full 44.1 kHz 16 bits stereo quality.

      The playback quality is just as good as with any flash based MP3 player when using headphones.

  31. Must have got it real cheap by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    Nokia created Symbian to prevent Microsoft putting the windows tax on mobiles, so I can imagine that the licence must have been pretty cheap. Most people don't use MP3s anyways, so it's not exactly a killer feature.

    1. Re:Must have got it real cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And maybe Microsoft paid Nokia.

  32. These Are Two Phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will definately not purchase.

  33. Re:Microsoft? Open Standards? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    You're missing something: they're using Microsoft's definition of "open". It's much like how Microsoft's definition of "innovate" really means "copy someone else's idea and add some proprietary crap to it, then claim it was our idea all along"; the MS definition of "open" means "open APIs to our closed and proprietary libraries and programming interfaces, so that you can be locked into our platform."

  34. Can't wait for Side-Scratchin' by sharkey · · Score: 1

    The Portable DJ mod is going to be killer!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    1. Re:Can't wait for Side-Scratchin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you can scratch audio conversations live as well. It should also include a short 1-3 second sample buffer, so you can say something, loop it, then scratch it via a touch pad running the length of the phone. You could pretend to be max headroom that way also. Cool. I can't wait!

  35. What will it do really well? by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So they have a phone that can play windows media, does it do it well? For what purpose would I want this? My daughter has a phone that takes pictures, real crappy pictures. She's always using my digital camera, so she must think so too.

    My daughters and I have iPods, we connect them to our car stereos, the home stereo, manage it with our computer and I even use it to play music in between sets in my band. What advantage would there be having a cellphone play music? What happens if a call comes in while attached to my PA system? I'm sorry but I want device that does it's main function really well, not a bunch of mediocre features slapped together in a phone.

    1. Re:What will it do really well? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      I agree, certainly with digital cameras that also play mp3s - thats just a stupid combo. But mobile phones are quickly becoming the modern urban Swiss army knife. they are so small, most people don't so much as take the rubbish out without theirs. They have already become most peoples' 3rd essential item, only your wallet and keys are more important when you're out and about and phones will probably replace those for some people quite soon.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:What will it do really well? by Kid+Plutonium · · Score: 1

      I commute between Amsterdam and Rotterdam [NL] twice a week and have noticed ever increasing numbers of fellow commuters listening to music on their mobile phones. Our office manager listens to the radio on her Nokia something-or-other. That said, there seem to be even more and more and more people listening to something via white iPod earphones..... Until mobile phones can deliver long battery life and seriously phat beats I'll stay married to my 3rd gen 40 gigger ((:

    3. Re:What will it do really well? by babyrat · · Score: 1

      I know these were probably rhetorical questions, but allow me to answer anyways...

      I'm going to the gym for an hour - I'm expecting a call, but can't delay my workout, and can't stand to listen to the drivel they play on the gym's stereo...I could bring two devices with me, or one...I'd prefer one. In this case if the phone was charged it would easily last the hour, I could get away with one device with me, and have solved my phonecall and music problem.

      The only problem I have with an integrated phone and MP3 player is battery life, and there are a multitude of situations like the one above where it would not be an issue. A 20 minute walk/bus/subway into work would be another case I can think of offhand that this would be ideal for.

      As for your camera phone example - your daughter BOUGHT the phone - that's all the phone manufacturer cares about...as far as they are concerned, whatever they did, they did it right.

    4. Re:What will it do really well? by dabraun · · Score: 1

      It is a lot easier to integrate decent WMA/MP3 playback into a device than it is to integrate decent camera functionality or even PDA functionality. Cameras are big (relatively speaking) - the smallest digital cameras make use of every last square millimeter to fit into their casings - and they are still bigger than many phones.

      MP3 players ... the size of a flash based MP3 player is based primarily on how big you need the buttons to be, how big the battery needs to be, and how big the earphone jack is. All three of these factors are already taken care of in the average flip phone.

      This is probably the first integration (of portable electronics) that really makes sense given the current state of technology and does not detract from the ability of the device to perform both functions as well as stand alone devices would.

      PDA and Camera functionality will continue to improve - but at this point both of those functions require significant sacrafices to fit into the space of a cell phone that make them poor alternatives for many users.

    5. Re:What will it do really well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really take phone calls while you are on stage
      at a gig?

  36. Instead, why not ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... buy a Archos Gmini XS-200 instead. It has 20GB HD, fits in your palm, has no DRM and sells for around $200. Great sound too.

    By buying products with DRM you are actually paying fees to MS thus helping MS to spread DRM. Instead, invest the money into a bigger HD, I'd suggest.

  37. Re:Microsoft? Open Standards? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    M$ version of O.P.E.N source.

    Ok
    Programmers
    Engineer for
    Nothing

  38. yay for ubiquitous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    crashy computing

    the revolution is here. as soon as it's done rebooting.

  39. Missing SynCE by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    what about synce?

    Did Nokia just get ripped off?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:Missing SynCE by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      SynCE is a way to synchronize your WinCE device's native PIM databases with a Linux (or unixlike) computer. It does not let you sync, say, Evolution, to, say, MS Exchange. That's what the ActiveSync protocol lets you do. Even if SynCE was a GPL version of ActiveSync, MS frequently changes their protocols (eg. driving Samba developers insane); the license means the protocol updates will be shared with the licensee, while SynCE users can get left behind until a developer re-reverse engineers the protocols.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:Missing SynCE by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Are there two versions of 'ActiveSync' then, because I use synCe with my PDA via it's ActiveSync protocol.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:Missing SynCE by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I believe that "ActiveSync" itself is just Microsoft's buzzword (dating from the ActiveX/Hotsync era of the late 1990s) for all its client/server data synchronization protocols. WinCE PDAs have them for all PDA filesystem content on the OS level, per application. Outlook/Exchange is an app-level sync, with its own protocol that goes beyond just bidirectional "backup", it includes command and timing data. That's why the licensed protocol is "Exchange Server ActiveSync" - "ActiveSync" itself is just a brand, not a protocol.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Missing SynCE by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Ah, their trying to do a hoover. I shall avoid calling anything ActiveSync. Just like I still say S.Q.L. Server instead of squeell Server.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  40. Thank you! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now I know which mobile phone NOT to buy when I ever do switch service.
    I wish someone would publish a list of the popular carriers, the models they sell and the OS the different models use.

  41. great! by fleaboy · · Score: 0

    The computer, the car, the house, and now the phone-I wonder when the total reboot-software will be available? Then I'll be able to reboot all of the crappy systems at once. Sure you can trust the government, just ask the Indians

    --
    Life is a gift. And my Karma couldn't possibly be 'Positive'
  42. In other news... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 0, Troll

    Eric_Cartman_South_P continues to not buy Nokia phones.

  43. Oh I'm so excited! by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    Now I can get acoustic neuroma run up my cell phone minutes, make Mr Gates even richer yet and hear my favorite songs reproduced with truely hideous sound quality while my hand and neck cramp up as I strain to use a device with the ergonomics of a brick. Whoopee for Billy ... won't make a nickle off of me. and my damn NOK is still 30% underwater.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    1. Re:Oh I'm so excited! by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      COUGH
      erm.. im pretty sure it will have head-phones and the sound quality of any current mini mp3 player. But yes, the phone industry is about making obscene amounts of money off of your investment (comms equipment) without actually doing much.

      As long as it plays mp3's and connects directly to my PC i don't care.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:Oh I'm so excited! by museumpeace · · Score: 1

      You could be right about the sound quality if I am willing to add the cost of a good headset to what I have already paid but my basic cell service where I live is a crappy connection...the downloads would have to add a good protocol layer to fend off dropped packets [I mean it IS digital right? I shoulda RTFA but the whole idea is patently rediculous to an old fogey like me] Also, as others have mentioned, trying to turn my cell phone into an ipod is going to either kill the battery, cause me to wear an outboard battery pack or tether me to the charger...all lame options for a guy to invariably trips over his own wires.
      Where would I use this ingenious service? If I am near my PC, I have multiple streaming and file-shared sources plus regular old CDs/mini-discs. If I'm in my car, my phone is for distracting me with phone calls, not playback [I have yet to finish two CD's on the longest family vaction trip in the car...CD's are already TOO MUCH music for me. If I am at work, they make us turn off our cellphones at the door [and they don't allow "cameras" in the building]...Nope. There must be somebody other than me they are planning to rob.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  44. Makes sense by m50d · · Score: 1

    Say what you want, but seriously, nothing beats WMA on quality for really tiny files. Which is what I imagine you tend to put on these phones, given how little storage they have. Seriously, try getting a 3-minute song down to 1mb with any other codec and see if it's still listenable. Because with wma it is - just, but it is.

    --
    I am trolling
    1. Re:Makes sense by INeededALogin · · Score: 1

      How about a 5;33 second clip down to 1.9 megs.

      Source: Massive Attack - Teardrop

      AAC(with .mov wrapper): Massive Attack - Teardrop

      The song is more than listenable, I had both playing simultaneous and switched between the streams, I could tell very little difference.

      If someone is dying for a Real Audio version... :-P

      Oh, if you like that song, Mezzanine by Massive Attack is a wonderful album, Available here

    2. Re:Makes sense by INeededALogin · · Score: 1

      second item should have a .mov on it instead of a .mp3: real link, no change to my last remark as I wasn't comparing them via those links.

    3. Re:Makes sense by DeeKayWon · · Score: 1
      Say what you want, but seriously, nothing beats WMA on quality for really tiny files.

      Do you have any evidence to back that up? Here's some evidence to the contrary - a public listening test that put Nero HE-AAC at the top of the pile at such low bitrates, followed by MP3Pro.

  45. ...so run Ogg on your series-60 by sopuli · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Right here. Works nicely on the SX1 stereo headset.

  46. WMP10 is for PC - NOT phone by 4r0g · · Score: 5, Informative
    The reuters story isn't really in line with the actual press releases.

    It does not say that Nokia is licensing Windows Media Player for phones, rather the technologies underneath, such as WMA, for achieving better interoperability with the PC. WMP10 is used as the PC frontend for the music solution they just launched.

    There's going to be "support for Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) digital rights management and the MPEG Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) family of codecs in Windows Media Player via a plug-in" too to support the service.

    --
    - 4r0g
    1. Re:WMP10 is for PC - NOT phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current Microsoft Smartphones are shipped with Windows Media 10 players, so the Nokia phones will likely have Windows Media branding too.

    2. Re:WMP10 is for PC - NOT phone by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I was about to lose my mind since I have read this release just 3 days ago. Also knowing Nokia ALWAYS stayed out of such closed (especially ms!) formats.

      https://helixcommunity.org/forum/forum.php?forum_i d=325

      Hmm, ok, when my 7650 dies (don't think so), my next phone will be Nokia.

  47. Question is... by DrScotsman · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Does it play files made with pirated Soundforge?

  48. I'M serious. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In other news (Score:2, Funny) SonyEriccsson reported sales increases of its handsets rose

    That got modded "funny" but I'm dead serious.

    I've been thinking about switching to a non-Nokia phone for my next cellphone upgrade. This clinches it.

    It's bad enough that some of the existing phones are subject to attack over bluetooth. Can you imagine them with Microsoft code inside?

    Maybe Microsoft WILL clean up their act here. But even if they do, given their track record I won't be able to trust them.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:I'M serious. by plover · · Score: 1
      Why wouldn't you switch away from Nokia? They've done nothing but design craptastic keyboards for the last three years. Like I want to dial on a Nike-swooosh or something.

      I bought a SonyEriiccssoonn (I can never remember which letters are doubled, so I doubled them all) T-637 last year, and have been very happy with it. Sound quality is OK, but the Bluetooth support just rocks! As a matter of fact, I'm running off to go have a Bluetooth car handsfree kit installed for it right this minute.

      And nobody's put out a virus for it yet. Bonus!

      --
      John
    2. Re:I'M serious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Several of my friends have had Sony-Ericsson phones for a while now, and so my sister got one. As soon as their warranties expired, the keyboards (including the little joystick thing) started breaking, etc. My sister dialed a gigantic phone bill from her purse cause the keyboard fucked up. S-E phones don;t need MS to fuck them up. just plain crap.

    3. Re:I'M serious. by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Funny, I was just shopping for a new Nokia phone when I read about this, and also decided it's time to switch to another brand.

      (I suppose that might make me a zealot in some eyes, but I have to deal with enough of MS's crappy overpriced half-broken junk APIs and OS in my "professional" life as software developer, and I really just don't want their brand anywhere else in my life, nor do I want to support a company that clearly has never cared about quality.)

    4. Re:I'M serious. by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      Try it.

      I recently changed to an SE T630. The sound quality whupped the Nokia straight out, and the BlueTooth was far superior. My Nokia 6600 is now basically a camera and storage device, with the memory card.

      On the downside, the T630 has a smaller screen and doesn't support many formats.

      The next one I go for will probably be a 900i or something.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  49. Finally Activesync for nokia! by wfberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Finally Activesync for nokia! Because with the nokia suite they have now, you can sync with outlook, outlook express, lotus notes, even stuff like defunct netscape calendar, or CSV files. But with activesync, it's outlook-only all the way baby! Way to go!

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:Finally Activesync for nokia! by weave · · Score: 1
      You forgot iCal or any other syncMl compliant software.

      I got a pocket PC and tried to read my email from an imap server using outlook and it'd insist on downloading all headers and taking forever, then crash (ok, I should trim my 4000 msg inbox down)

      The mail app on Sybian is pretty damn good.

      Hate to see Nokia abandon all of that.

  50. How? New Symbian will have DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's right, so steer clear of corporate-owned music if you want to use your stuff wherever you want.

  51. In the news... by micromuncher · · Score: 1

    CTVNewsNet, that is pretty much a puppet as it is owned by Bell GlobalMedia, is really playing up the "Apple faces competition from Microsoft and Nokia" angle of this news bite. Not surprising as Bell pushes Nokia. And not atypical of Microsoft FUD to announce vapor hardware/software so the minions can go bashing.

    MM

    --
    /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  52. Nokia? Microsoft? by midianus · · Score: 1

    Well, actually, this deal will be the final hit for nokia, because nokia doesn't have a world dominance anymore, it's samsung who has all the nice and shiny features nowadays, and samsungs don't break up when you by mistake throw your phone out of the window from the third floor in a house (Tested), and it's samsung that doesn't break up when you throw it into a wall by mistake (tested). Nokia already has crappy hardware, so why not make it have crappy software too.


    EOF, client excited with DSLBOX2WALL signal.

  53. Booo Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is Nokia supporting a closed proprietary anti-standard like WMA ?

    I thought Nokia were cleverer than that but obviously not.

  54. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me Not To Use Nokia

  55. Great Choice! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
    I switched from MP3 and AAC to WMA after conducting extensive personal double-blind listening tests.

    WMA is clearly superior for classical and Jazz recordings at low and high bitrates. I also like the choice I get with on-line music providers, and the fact that there are at least 40 commercial WMA players on the market, not to mention about 50% of the newest DVD players on the market play WMA audio files.

    I applaud Nokia for making such a sound choice.

    1. Re:Great Choice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40 commercial WMA players ... there are actually hundreds of devices that can play WMA files. You'd be hard pressed to find 10 current devices that do *not* support WMA. iPod, maybe some really low-end DVD players that are MP3 only ...

    2. Re:Great Choice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if it's meant to be funny, or if you're really both this clueless and deaf.

  56. Apple is screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nokia will kick Apple out of the music business. There are lots of Nokia phones out there, more tham macs and ipods together.

  57. Blue screen of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, soon millions of people around the globe can admire the BSOD on their mobile phones!

  58. My Cell Phone Rant by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

    ...Okay I am being serious here- not trying to flame, or troll.
    But why do people need cell phones? Admittedly I have owned a couple in my day, and worked for a major cellphone network-- but I still fail to see the real purpose of them.
    Typically I make plans, people call me- leave a message on my answering machine and we do something-- do you really need to be on call for 24 hours a day?
    I understand business using them, I understand using them for fear of something happening while driving. But they are so unnecessary for most people. Seeing people shopping with them- having their lazy ass spouse on the other end - whether it's a video-store, or grocery store it is almost disturbing.
    It seems cell phones don't even know where they belong, you have cell phones with PDA features, the Ngage, photo-cameras, and now mp3-store phones. There seems to be something amiss.
    Cell Phones are the ultimate scam- akin to selling air. I would say I am indifferent to cell phone users ... I just am questioning their relevancy and looking for others point of view.

    1. Re:My Cell Phone Rant by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      My own personal reasons: 1. Convenience. Being reachable at the same number, wherever you are. Being able to reach another person when the need arises (e.g, "I forgot what you said you wanted at the store," "I'm lost, can you look at a map and tell me where I am," "I'm drunk and I need a ride home," "I'm stuck in traffic and I'll be a half-hour late." Eliminating those times when you can't leave the house because you are waiting for someone to call. 2. Safety. It is said that the most powerful weapon of the police is the radio. One of the most powerful weapons that a person can carry concealed in a city is a direct link to 911/Roadside Assistance/Friends and relatives. 3. Social interaction. The wireless phone has opened up a somewhat new way of behaving socially. It is common now for people to make no plans at all, but simply coordinate their activities with friends completely on the fly, in real-time, by using text messaging or phone messages. If you don't have a cell phone, you have no hope of meeting up with your friends. 4. Cost. With free long distance, a wireless plan with a reasonable amount of minutes can be cheaper than comparable POTS lines, assuming you don't talk for hours at a time. Finally, 5. Travel. Eliminate the need to use hotel phones, or worse, (shudder) pay phones when on vacation.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    2. Re:My Cell Phone Rant by pekkak · · Score: 1

      Well, here's two reasons why I prefer a cell phone.

      1. With my usage profile a cell phone is actually cheaper than a land line (this in Finland).

      2. Cell phone is a lot more convenient than a land line. It's a lot easier to reach people these days than before cell phones. If I don't want to be available, I will switch my cell to silent mode. Owning a cell doesn't force me to be available 24 hours a day.

      Well that's it, a better product for less the price. What more could I possibly want? Really, cell phones are changing the way people interact these days. They have already had a huge impact on the society.

      --
      What are we going to do tomorrow night? The same thing we do every night, Pinky. Try to take over the world!
  59. Great .... by onlyjoking · · Score: 1

    ... Soon all Nokia phones will be infested with spyware, adware, trojans, virii and all the other Windows bestiary. Some learn the hard way. Some never learn (throws hands in air).

  60. Oh my by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

    One friend has a Dell PDA, and the darn thing uses Windows CE. Anyway, it just gets stuck and needs rebooting all the time! I've never seen such an annoying device.

    Anyway, to the point: it's very obvious that this kind of "deal" is always made between non-technical people. Always like that. A non-tech from MS convinced a non-tech from Nokia. Then engineers have to do with it. There also might be some hidden cash in between, but shoosh. What do we know...

  61. Imagine the Steve Ballmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ringtone: Developers, Developers, Developers ...

    How are they going to make such a sweaty phone?

  62. Should have been Nokia & Apple by Danta · · Score: 1

    It's just all gone wrong. It should have been Apple + Nokia and Microsoft + Motorola.

    Think about it. Nokia is known for their UI where every detail is thoroughly researched for userfriendliness and simplicity. So is Apple.

    The last Motorola phone I owned had a UI that was worthless. So I think the Motorola phones designers don't deserve any better than Microsoft.

  63. Not 4 me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks. I'm not going to be participating in the encumbered DRM music thing... If this doesn't flop, I guess that means I'll be relegated to the dinosaurs. But then again, with our economy, how much music will I actually be able to buy working at McDonalds or Walmart after all other job opportunities expire and I become desperate?

  64. Re:CUM MUFFIN by spike42 · · Score: 0

    Wow... just ... wow

    --
    This sig sucks.
  65. counter-strike by riqnevala · · Score: 1

    if I just keep the damn thing on vibrate all the time? I hate those )(@#&@!#@!#& ringtones

    Walk next to the phone, start singing/whistling along with the ringtone, and keep it going until they hang up the phone. Remember to praise the ringtone. If you can't sing, you can get excellent results.

    --
    love slashdot. populate it. use it. abuse it. hate it. kill it. miss it. stop following links, they only kill servers.
  66. Yay! and WMV on your TV ... unless you wise up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and you'll get WMV on your TV, too, unless you wise up. MS has already planted what looks like a Manchurian candidate (sorry, link in finnish) as head of the Finnish television service. The previous head was heading the same direction as the BBC has by pursuing open standards. MS's candidate has no background in radio or television and his only 'IT' experience was 2 years at MS. He was chosen over other highly experienced candidates (sorry link in Finland Swedish.

    If ever there was a time to use Ogg Vorbis, this would be it. Ericsson handsets have more or less caught up with Nokia's especially after the stumble Nokia made with the latest models. Beating Nokia to Ogg could push them into the lead.

  67. Uh.. In other news... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    As part of the companies' joint announcement today, Nokia and Real officially communicated that Nokia has both licensed the latest Helix DNA Client code base and has officially joined the Helix Community.

    https://helixcommunity.org/forum/forum.php?forum_i d=325

    Let me add one thing myself. Realplayer actually works in my 2mb ram Nokia 7650.