Slashdot Mirror


Cyrix Hotplate Howto

fimbulvetr writes "Looking to put those old processors to work? Tired of catching flack for having hardware, but no use for it? Worry no more! Doc from rabidhardware.com shows us how to employ 7 Cyrix processors to build a spectacular cooking device. Cooking instructions not included. Void where prohibited."

172 comments

  1. Finally, a reason to use Cyrix by Willeh · · Score: 5, Funny

    While Intel recently made this impossible via their Speedstep technology, Cyrix is right on the bleeding edge of multitaskable (computing/ cooking) CPU's. For this, i salute them.

    --
    Will wank off Linus Torvalds for fame.
    1. Re:Finally, a reason to use Cyrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Intel SpeedStep would be perfect for a Crock Pot. You could set it to Boil, Simmer, or Warm.

  2. Umm by TheKidWho · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wouldnt a Pentium 4 be better for this?

    1. Re:Umm by Nodar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cost/Price ratio just isn't there.

      --
      Don't Blame me if I seem bitter, I'm at work, and the TV only plays soap operas.
    2. Re:Umm by Yaruar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope they don't try this with first generation athlon processors, they are likely to melt through their cookware!

      --
      Working for the (other) man
    3. Re:Umm by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      if you have too much money, yeah ... else just use (obsolete) cyrix cpu's.

    4. Re:Umm by dfn5 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Wouldnt a Pentium 4 be better for this?

      So would gas, but the article isn't aimed at people looking for the best way to do something.

      --
      -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    5. Re:Umm by yogikoudou · · Score: 0

      HOT CPUs are not new. Now they cook food, that's the difference.

    6. Re:Umm by Scummer · · Score: 1

      You'd burn your eggs in an instant!

      --
      The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -- Unknown
    7. Re:Umm by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      The P4's run much hotter than the first gen Athlons.

    8. Re:Umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's up with the mods today? No insightful ??

  3. Cool idea but... by lecithin · · Score: 4, Funny

    "To do this we'll be using 7 6x86 Cyrix CPUs ranging from 100mhz to 150mhz, dissipating an upwards of 20+ watts each. All chips will be supplied with 5v regardless of their original requirements, which I imagine will also improve the thermal output."

    Wouldn't this void the warranty?

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:Cool idea but... by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 5, Funny

      The place I used to work at had a few cyrix based computers. The power supply fan quit on one of them, which in turn burned out the CPU fan. Finally 2 weeks later when someone called me complaining that the pc was wicked slow I checked it out. You could actually read "Cyrix MII" on the backside of the heatsink.

    2. Re:Cool idea but... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      MY athlon 1.4 overheated last night (Really really rattly broken fan gave up i think) and it burnt the whole text of the top of the chip onto the heatsink. plus there was lots of crumbly stuff coming off all over the processor... waaa...

    3. Re:Cool idea but... by Captoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe not. He did say that his voltage regulator would put out 1A at 5V. That's 5 watts. So, each processor should dissipate about 5/7 watts. It takes a while to cook breakfast that way, but it might make the warranty last a few seconds longer than if he really did get 20+ watts from each chip. He's just being sneaky.

    4. Re:Cool idea but... by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had a Cyrix MII chip that overheated to the point that it turned the fan (cheap plastic fan with cheap plastic prongs holding it to the heatsink) to a pool of molten plastic at the bottom of the case.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    5. Re:Cool idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing..

      In a genius move I purchased a Boardrunner brand board for my first Athlon system. The promptly went out of business a few months later.

      I was using the system for a couple of years when one day I came home to a real strong electronic burning smell. It wasn't the processor (in fact I had recently replaced the fan), but the South Bridge, which had gotten so hot that the top of the BGA came detached from the board.
      I still have the Slot (is AMD 1 or A? i forget) processor, but no ancient motherboard to use it in.
      It was an Athlon 800, so if even a few hundred megahertz were burned it should still be enough to use as a cable modem router.

    6. Re:Cool idea but... by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 1

      Well, the CPUs might not get hot enough to cook with, but the poor 7805 sure will (dissipating 7W in an area that small! yikes.)

  4. Re:Beginning Hardware Hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    As a beginner, you'll want to start with crude tools. You'll need a blowtorch and a rubber mallet.

  5. Recipe for cooking with Cyrix by miracle69 · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) Host server on Cyrix processor.
    2) Post on Slashdot.
    3) Watch food get cooked.

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
    1. Re:Recipe for cooking with Cyrix by DeepCerulean · · Score: 0

      you missed: 4) ??? 5) Profit!

    2. Re:Recipe for cooking with Cyrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4) Holy crap, my house is on fire!

    3. Re:Recipe for cooking with Cyrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4) Add google ads to the page
      5) ...Profit?

  6. Link dead... by Atrax · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... possibly just me but for now it looks like the fabled slashdot effect is in early action here

    --
    Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    1. Re:Link dead... by niteice · · Score: 1

      I'd like to be the first to formally welcome you to Slashdot.

      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
  7. I call shenanigans! by YankeeInExile · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can a single 7805 rated for a maximum Icc of 1A provide the couple dozen amperes to provide even the output equivalent to an Easy-bake oven?

    My inner child just got the shit kicked out of him by my inner skeptic who says, This should have waited a few weeks for 1 April

    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    1. Re:I call shenanigans! by enosys · · Score: 1
      Yes, that is ridiculous. The only way that could have worked is if the 7805 was defective and it was letting 12V through.

      I also don't understand why they used a 5V regulator when the power supply has a regulated 5V output.

    2. Re:I call shenanigans! by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      IF he was serious about heat generation he would have used a straight wirewound dropper resistor, diode bridge and capacitor - throw in a 2N3055 power transistor shunt circuit and you'd have a nice little spoon warmer!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    3. Re:I call shenanigans! by ericzundel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm not sure how they really got it to work either, but you can put more power through a 7805 if you include a beefy enough heat sink, which allegedly they did. However, 120Watts? That sounds like a bit much. My guess is that he didn't REALLY get 120 watts through, but enough current to warm up the chips nicely. As you know, it only takes one CPU to fry an egg.

    4. Re:I call shenanigans! by YankeeInExile · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...indeed. In the time since my previous posting, I went and looked at the hotplate I have in my kitchen, and it dissipates 850W ... So, even if they could configure a handful of CPUs (with no clock feeding them) as heaters, it would take 42 of them to give the equivalent to a pretty pathetic cooking appliance.

      I re-assert: This article is 100% unadulterated bullshit

      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    5. Re:I call shenanigans! by Technician · · Score: 1

      Do the math people. In a DC circuit Volts times Amps = watts. A 7805 is a 1 Amp 5 Volt regulator. They are trying to run several 20 Watt IC's? I hate to be a antagonist, but it is not going to work.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    6. Re:I call shenanigans! by YankeeInExile · · Score: 1

      As you know, it only takes one CPU to fry an egg.
      No, I do not know that, nor do I believe it.
      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    7. Re:I call shenanigans! by Technician · · Score: 4, Informative

      My guess is that he didn't REALLY get 120 watts through, but enough current to warm up the chips nicely.

      From a quick Google search on one of these...

      USM 7805 is a 3-terminal positive voltage regulator designed with built in internal current limiting, thermal shutdown and safe-area compensation for maximum flexibility and safety . With adequate heat sinking provided, USM 7805 can deliver up to 1.5A output current.

      I'm with you on your conclusion. The chip at current limiting gives you about 7.5 Watts, not 120 Watts or anything close. I have a night light for the kids that put out the same heat he could have gotten.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    8. Re:I call shenanigans! by phasm42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, the article talks about how it was added to regulate the amperage available, which is not what a 7805 does. They noted it was rated for 1A output, so that means it could normally put out a whopping 5W of power. Plus, since they are going from 12V to 5V, they are eating 7V in the regulator, which works out to 7W @ 1A, so this means that the regulator is dissipating more power than the load it supplies. So I agree, either the 7805 was defective, or the article was BS.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    9. Re:I call shenanigans! by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      not only that, the processors are only getting power - won't they need a clock source (unless it's integrated) - you need transistors rapidly switching to generate the heat, unless he's just turned the entire die into a silicon resistor.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    10. Re:I call shenanigans! by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Not only that but the 7805 is going to be dissipating more power than all the cpus put together if it's being driven from 12V.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    11. Re:I call shenanigans! by YankeeInExile · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, let me backpedal a bit on my flat denial.

      I can imagine designing a system that used a 20W heater to heat a very large mass of metal to a suitable temperature to fry an egg, with sufficient heat capacity to keep that temperature throughout the cooking of the egg

      Now, assume a mass of copper (Specific Heat of 0.385 Joule/g/C)

      I just fried an egg, using my little hotplate. I used a deep-fry thermometer to measure the temperature of the oil at 135C near the middle of the cooking process (just before I turned the egg). From raw egg to breakfast was 3 minutes 30 seconds (plus or minus 15 ... It's difficult to juggle an egg a hotplate a fry pan and a stopwatch without setting the kitchen on fire!)

      So, I soaked 850 (power output of hot plate) watts into my breakfast for 210 seconds, or a total energy input of 178.5 kJ. So, how much copper do I need to heat to a 135, such that after sucking out 175,000 joules it will be about 120. Fifteen degree drop , 175000 joules, comes to about 30 kg of copper.

      To heat 30 kg of copper to that 135 in the first place (from an ambient of, let's say 25) will take 110 * 30000 * 38.5 equals 1.27 MJ.

      At twenty watts, a mere 17.6 hours, assuming your heater and the block of copper are in a perfectly insulated space. Putting it in the real world will make it take longer (in fact, probably an infinite amount of time because of radiation loss).

      Learn the difference between heat and temperature

      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    12. Re:I call shenanigans! by XorNand · · Score: 1

      Actually... People have fried eggs on a P4. And since many other chips can run even hotter, it's probably been done more than once.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    13. Re:I call shenanigans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ooooh, look at mr. electrical engineer here who can't even read the fucking article. The project used a 250W PSU to run the CPUs. He used a regulator to get a seperate 5V rail for a few doohickeys.

      Don't feel so smart now, huh? And all the drooling morons who replied and agreed, shame on you. You embarrassed yourselves, and the field of electronics, by your lack of humor, and lack of READING BEFORE TYPING.

      Idiots, morons, reprobates, genetic mistakes and candidates for retroactive abortions all of you.

    14. Re:I call shenanigans! by iroll · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you want confirmation, just go read his article on lapping and you'll see that yes, it is tongue-firmly-in-cheek. The silly staged 'cooking' pictures also could have clued you in ;)

      (I'm not an electrical engineer and I caught this one...)

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    15. Re:I call shenanigans! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Personally I have ran a 7805 up to 3A current draw for about 1 hour.

      I had an insane amount of heat sink on it (ok 2 of them, one was bonded to the plastic face also) as well as using heat sink great from the military that has a higher heat transfer capabilities than arctic silver. (Ok my brother was an EE in the air force and I still have a small tub of this stuff.)

      did it get hot? you bet your butt. a finned heatsink rated for a gigantic switching transistor was not comfortable to touch, and I ran water down the fins to further cool the whole setup.

      the trick is running the input voltage very close to the output voltage of the regulator. 6 volts into a 7805 will not increase the heat dissapation by trying to sink all that extra voltage into heat.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:I call shenanigans! by tzanger · · Score: 1

      How can a single 7805 rated for a maximum Icc of 1A provide the couple dozen amperes to provide even the output equivalent to an Easy-bake oven?

      It's called a pass transistor. 2n3055 or equivalent and, as a bonus, you can use the 2n3055 to provide extra heat!

    17. Re:I call shenanigans! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Not if it shorts. (evil grin)

    18. Re:I call shenanigans! by TheHawke · · Score: 1

      {snip}
      I'm with you on your conclusion. The chip at current limiting gives you about 7.5 Watts, not 120 Watts or anything close. I have a night light for the kids that put out the same heat he could have gotten.
      {/snip}

      And I got a easy-bake oven that uses a 100 watt lamp that will do the same.

      http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/41/ezbake.shtml

      On a side note, me and my fellow geeks here in the office debated about how to build a microwave oven into a case. But that got shot full of holes due to the energy required, the shielding needed to keep the PC's electronics from being scrambled,
      and the power surge that a micro creates when it turns on, which is rather excessive. Oh, did I mention it's added WEIGHT? 20lbs for the transformer itself!
      And the safety that is required when tangling with microwave energy of such magnitude (two door switches that will blow the micro's fuse if they are not in agreement), the heating chamber itself, the door, it's gasketing, and the power that the transformer and magnetron generates when running at a full head of steam.

      Too dammed scary for me when all that adds up.

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    19. Re:I call shenanigans! by MikeS2k · · Score: 1
      --
      120 characters should be enough for anybody
    20. Re:I call shenanigans! by InvalidError · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 7805 itself may have an internal 1A limit but 1A is plenty for driving a current-boost transistor, at which point the limiting factor becomes pass transistor heatsinking.

      1- connect ~5 ohms resistor between reg-In and power source
      2- connect PNP base to the regulator-resistor node
      3- connect PNP collector to regulator output
      4- connect PNP emitter to power source

      At very low loads, the transistor's base remains reverse-biased so the regulator provides all load current but beyond 200mA, the load's bulk migrates towards the pass transistor.

      Without this patch though, the 7805 would either shutdown or burn out... from the looks of the only picture that loaded before the site died on me, they used a tiny heatsink and probably no pass transistor so...

      TO220: Tja = maybe 20C/W with the tiny heatsink
      Pd = (Vin-Vout) * Iout = (12-2)*1 = 10W (the CPUs are practically shorting the output so 2V seems reasonable.)
      Tj = Pd * Tja + Ta = 25C + 10W * 20C/W = 225C

      Since most silicon ICs do not like junction temperatures above 125C, I declare their 7805 most likely deep-fried.

    21. Re:I call shenanigans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you read the article either.

      Schematic (as seen through the mirrordot link someone posted up) shows:

      12 V Line from PSU -> (1) 7805 Voltage Reg -> (7) CPUs.

      One 7805 regulator, 7 CPUs.

    22. Re:I call shenanigans! by YankeeInExile · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure -- there are a myriad of ways to 'pump up' the output of a VR - but none of these techniques were drawn on their schematic, nor included in their construction photos.

      Remember the SSM 4K Static Ram board for the S100? It used a 7805 with a shunt resistance. It would fail catastrophically if you built the kit with the low-power version of the 2102. (Hint: The 7805 can source current but not sink any.)

      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    23. Re:I call shenanigans! by YankeeInExile · · Score: 1

      Well, someone else has pointed out that the entire site is bogus parody, and we've all got fishhooks in our mouths.

      None of their stuff comes close to the article in the April 1982 (1983?) "Doctor Kilobyte's Personal Popular Recreational Micro Computer World Journal" (Creative Computing's superfamous parody edition) on adding a bolt-on turbocharger to your PDP 11/34.

      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    24. Re:I call shenanigans! by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Well, I am sure the article is tongue in cheek. THough I suspect that you might be able to do something with newer processors.

      However, unless you fry your egg on high (I don't), the energy requirements may be much lower. For example, I made an omelet today with my stove on Medium. I am guessing that the omelet was probably cooked to about 150F or 65C. Now, obviously the pan and burner would have been hotter than this, but somehow your measurements don't seem quite right to me.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    25. Re:I call shenanigans! by YankeeInExile · · Score: 1

      Well, what you caught is that: Only a small fraction of the total energy from my hot plate went into my egg (And you're right -- it was kinda overcooked ... it's challenging to prepare breakfast and do thermodynamics in your head).

      The argument could be made that the CPU-powered-block-of-metal cooker would suffer similar inefficiencies, thus requiring the same amount of energy overkill ...

      Another error was a more serious procedural error: I started timing from cold-pan/cold-oil, not from hot-pan/hot-oil ... so that really does throw the whole experiment into disrepute. Oh well ... it was fun anyway. And a damn sight more belivable than TFA

      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    26. Re:I call shenanigans! by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I noticed the same thing.

      A TO-220 package regulator can dissipate about 2 watts with no heat sink safely at an ambient temperature of 25C. Let's say with their dinky heat sink it can dissipate 7 watts for simplicity although it is probably half that.

      They are dropping 12 volts down to 5 volts so the voltage across the regulator is 7 volts. 7 volts at 7 watts is 1 amp. Since the output is 5 volts they have 5 watts of regulated power available before the regulator overheats and shuts down.

      The regulator in this case is actually putting out more thermal energy then the CPUs . . .

    27. Re:I call shenanigans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fail it, unconditionally. You fail it even harder because you believed this bogus article. The world is a dumber place for having you exist in it.

    28. Re:I call shenanigans! by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      I prefer real-world black magic like the "Magic Switch" - stuff that should (not) have any effect in the real world yet actually does.

      I did read some fake-telling posts... I just felt like proving that the 7805 they hypothetically used would be long dead before any sensible CPU heat got generated.

  8. slashdotted? by qwertphobia · · Score: 0

    yes, their webserver runs on Cyrix processors too!

    --
    Never ask for directions from a two-headed tourist! -Big Bird
  9. Cyrix? by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

    Just get a single P4 chip, no need for 7 individual cyrix chips... Intel is always thinking about people like me who don't want 7 things... I want 7 things in one... ;)

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
  10. Cool by Fallus+Shempus · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... er ....

  11. First menu will be... by danormsby · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fish and chips anyone?

    --
    Omnis amans amens
  12. 7 Cyrixes, 20+ Watts each by MBCook · · Score: 3, Interesting
    OK, 7 processors * 20 Watts each = 140 Watts. Isn't that about the thermal envelope of a P4? Don't the top of the line P4EEs make 165 Watts?

    That said, an interesting use of old CPUs. I wouldn't think that they would be hot enough, but I guess it makes sense. I heard that when the Intel guys finished designing the origional Pentium, someone gave the head designer a hotplate as a gift because the hotplate had the same thermal dissapation (W/cm^2) as the Pentium.

    That said, the hack would have been more impressive if the processors were running Seti@Home at the time. But then it would be hard to get them all right next to eachother like that.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:7 Cyrixes, 20+ Watts each by fitten · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the main issue is spreading the heat over the area of the pan and avoiding hotspots. With one P4, you'd have one spot where heat was being introduced to the pan. With seven, you have more points of contact. This is why you'll see professional chefs prefer gas stoves instead of electric because flame heats a large area while the electric typically heats where the pan touches the element, which may only be a few spots if the pan and/or the element aren't perfectly flat.

    2. Re:7 Cyrixes, 20+ Watts each by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, 7 processors * 20 Watts each = 140 Watts. Isn't that about the thermal envelope of a P4? Don't the top of the line P4EEs make 165 Watts?

      Yes, but you're failing to take into account the "Financial Envelope" of the P4EEs. In other words, the envelope stuffed full of $100 bills you'd need to purchase one.

      Which you're then going to fry.

    3. Re:7 Cyrixes, 20+ Watts each by uujjj · · Score: 1

      no no no. The main issue is that the P4 Expensive Edition costs more than an actual hot plate. This article is about cooking on the cheap!

    4. Re:7 Cyrixes, 20+ Watts each by Politburo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The main reason gas is preferred is because of heat control. With gas, you can quickly adjust the amount of heat going to your pan. Electric takes time to both heat up and cool down.

    5. Re:7 Cyrixes, 20+ Watts each by cakefool · · Score: 1

      Try an inductive heater - its better than gas, I guarantee. I was very sceptical at first, then we tested some where I work - more control than gas!

    6. Re:7 Cyrixes, 20+ Watts each by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those things rock and have (amaizingly) been around since the late 70s.

      Although I was always worried about such strong magnetic fields at nut level, but I didnt want kids anyway!

    7. Re:7 Cyrixes, 20+ Watts each by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 1

      That said, an interesting use of old CPUs. I wouldn't think that they would be hot enough, but I guess it makes sense.


      Not all of them were THAT hot. I owned a cyrix 6x86 a few years ago (1996 or 1997) and it was so hot that you would get burned if you touched the heatsink. One day I traded it for a equally spec'd pentium and it was so cool that I ran it for several weeks without the heatsink fan (it broke, so I took the fan and left the metal) without failing once.
  13. Or, you could use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a single P4 Prescott!

  14. or by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

    7 cyrix procesor or for those with a bit more cash, a single p4 presscot , incidently was the webserver running on a cyrix as it apears to be out for the count so heres a coral cach link on nyud http://www.rabidhardware.net/index.php?id=44.nyud. net:8090

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:or by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Informative

      sorry about that formated the link badly http://www.rabidhardware.net.nyud.net:8090/index.p hp?id=44

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hostname specified in the Coralized URL is currently over its hourly quota. Please try back later. .. Did we slashdot nyud...

  15. gee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you'd think a site called 'rabidhardware' would stand up to a slashdotting a little better...

    insert joke about the slashdot effect remotely cooking food here.

  16. favorite line by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    "All chips will be supplied with 5v regardless of their original requirements, which I imagine will also improve the thermal output. "

  17. article text.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the printable version: http://www.rabidhardware.net/index.php?id=44&print able=yes
    Welcome to the 21st century. The age of conservation, renewable materials and Jolene Blalock. As we're urged to replace our gaming equipment on a weekly basis, many tonnes of silicon, lead, and copies of Daikatana make it into our planet's landfills.
    At RabidHardware we strive to be environmentally sound (so says our lawyers). By re-using hardware we would have so hastily discarded in our youth, we can now give our dear Earth a new lease on life. Seeing how the Great White North is in the middle of one of the more colder winters as of late, and I'm on a budget (read: cheap bastard), I figure we could get two birds stoned at once with this latest project: A CPU-driven hotplate.
    Enter the intrepid Cyrix(tm) Central Processing Unit. Instead of piling the landfills with these retired, non-biodegradable heathens (or donating them to NASA for shuttle heat shielding), we may as well put em to further use. So what do we do instead you ask? Well, there is only one thing a Cyrix CPU does well besides reflecting heat, and that is producing it.
    To do this we'll be using 7 6x86 Cyrix CPUs ranging from 100mhz to 150mhz, dissipating an upwards of 20+ watts each. All chips will be supplied with 5v regardless of their original requirements, which I imagine will also improve the thermal output.
    These be my materials:
    - 7 Cyrix CPUs (1x PR120, 4x PR166s, 2x PR200s)
    - Lexan sheet for CPU base
    - aluminum/copper/cookie sheet for hotplate surface
    - AT 250W power supply
    - wire, solder, fixin's
    - 7805 Voltage Regulator

    After a quick look at this handy chart, I've decided to use pins A7 (core voltage) and B10 (ground) for our electrical connections.
    Step 1 - Processors
    First off, clean up the procs in question, as stuff like ancient heatsink compound or warranty stickers (that haven't already burned off of course) will impede heat transfer!
    Most important thing we need to do is supply power to these little thermo-electric heaters of ours. All we need to do is run a 12v rail from the power supply into the voltage regulator (which will output +5v @ 1A) and connect the procs in parallel:
    I realize there may be a better way to do this but we don't have time for rational thought. After all, my bacon expires tomorrow and I am VERY hungry! I also realize we could just use the 5v rail directly off the power supply. The reason for the VRE though is to regulate the amperage available to our hotplate while adding an extra stop-gap to keep our high quality power supply from exploding (prematurely?). SAFETY FIRST!
    Feel free to remove the surrounding pins for easier soldering, sure as hell won't be needing them anymore!
    Step 2 - Goop
    Next off, we'll need to create our most excellent thermal interface. The Arctic Silver 3 which I've had in my toolkit for several years should do nicely, as it has a peak temperature of 180c. Feel free to don a piece of plastic or your favourite straight razor (preferably bloodless) to develop that sexy paper-thin layer of arctic goop, but I'm sort of in a rush.
    You may have noticed we've also attached a heatsink to the regulator. Unfortunately, as Thermaltake or Alpha haven't made performance VRE heatsinks (yet), I had to go with a generic brand. Don't worry though, we'll make up for the performance loss later.
    Once you've got your transfer medium installed, it's time to add the hotplate surface. I went with a generic piece of metal from a cookie sheet, but a aluminum or copper sheet would do better. I'm assuming you'll be lapping the side that the procs will be in contact with, right? Once it's ready, position your hotplate surface and press down to further spread around that silvery goodness.
    Now is probably as good a time as any to mention: As with any of my projects, make sure you have a fire extinguisher and bomb squad nearby. Again, SAFETY FIRST!
    At RabidHardware we're always in for any extra per

    1. Re:article text.... by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks for the mirror.

      I'm just wondering why he decided to cook on the chips. He should just cook on the linear voltage regulator. The voltage drop on the regulator going from 12 volts to 5 is 7 volts. It's a 1 amp regulator feeding the chips. It puts out 5 watts of power to the chips (if they don't overload the regulator and trip the current regulation) while the regulator is putting out 7 watts. Things will be warmer near the 7805. This is especialy true if the chip goes into current limiting (very likely) so it outputs less than 5 volts and drops more than 7 volts at the current limit.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  18. This reminds me by 2names · · Score: 3, Interesting
    of some hardware we cooked with in the Army circa 1990...

    5 cavity HV Klystron (satellite transmitter)

    TSSP unit (shouldn't have gotten that hot, but did)

    Hang some grub in front of the dish and crank 'er up to 7200 watts

    Manifold of a diesel generator (obviously)

    Ah, those were the days...

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:This reminds me by DaChesserCat · · Score: 3, Funny
      Air Force Cookware, circa 1994 (I was stationed in the Republic of Korea, at the time):
      • floodlights in the hardened shelters; use a couple feet of safety wire and you could make something which would hold your MRE main course right in front of the glass
      • exhaust from a dash 60 (turbine-powered generator and high-volume air compressor, mounted in a semi-mobile cart)
      • F110-GE-120 exhaust (engine in the F-16's at the base); you had to hold on to that MRE packet REAL tight. The launch routine for an F-16 tyically involved 10-20 minutes of standing around while the pilot ran through their checks, with the engine running. No, the afterburner isn't used in this, but you can still hold an MRE packet up in the jet exhaust and get it warm enough to be edible within about 60 seconds. If you accidentally let go of it, well, you could go find it in the fence after the plane finally left.
      --
      ... by the Dew of Mountains the thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning
    2. Re:This reminds me by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      "HEY WANG!"
      - Al Czervik

      LMAO. Long live Rodney!

    3. Re:This reminds me by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Funny
      5 cavity HV Klystron (satellite transmitter)
      Hang some grub in front of the dish and crank 'er up to 7200 watts

      The rhythmic thumping noise you hear is an FCC compliance officer banging his head on his desk.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:This reminds me by two_socks · · Score: 1

      ... but you can still hold an MRE packet up in the jet exhaust and get it warm enough to be edible ...

      You sure about that? My military weight loss plan was "quit eating until the terrorist threat level goes back down and they let the TCN* cooks back on post". I found it much preferable to just eat peanuts and raisins, rather than MREs.

      * TCN: Third Country Nationals. Not Kuwaitis, not US citizens, too big a risk to have cooking for us when we were on alert. The military sure does love their TLAs.

      --
      I can't help it - I'm a 19D.
    5. Re:This reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi,

      The military are exempt from regulations that would affect them. Civilian equipment isn't allowed to interfere with military stuff, but military communications could fry a TV sattelite, and the FCC couldn't do squat.

      -- The AC

    6. Re:This reminds me by peekitty · · Score: 1

      I never tried cooking with the dash 60, we had the jammers' thoughtfully-placed engine engine access hatch for that (a jammer is a low-slung munitions lift truck.) You could reheat a stale flightline burger in there in two minutes.

      The dash 60's exhaust stream was the launch vehicle of choice for hats, gloves, checklists, or other personal items left unattended by other member of the maintenance crew.

      I left the AF in '90, you probably can't get away with this crap anymore...

    7. Re:This reminds me by DaChesserCat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I remember jammers. Never had to operate one (I was a crew chief, not a load toad), but I imagine you could tuck something foil-wrapped (like an MRE) under the engine access hatch and get it pretty warm.

      We didn't launch checklists, gloves, etc. off the dash 60 exhaust because we would then have to go locate/clean up whatever we launched. That kinda takes the fun out of it.

      --
      ... by the Dew of Mountains the thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning
    8. Re:This reminds me by DaChesserCat · · Score: 1

      MRE's and other pre-packaged foods were always preferable to the dining halls at Kunsan. It was generally agreed that, if the North ever attacked at night, anyone near the dining hall would toss flares or something up on the roof, so they would bomb the dining hall out of existence.

      I ate a lot of Nestle Crunch bars and Chips Ahoy, and drank a lot of Dew while I was there. Really whacked out my metabolism.

      At "the Kun," we had native Korean cooks on the base, no TCN's around. Lots of those stateside, but those were usually related to the military members serving on the base (someone served in Japan, got married while they were there, and the wife worked in the dining hall when they were transferred back to the States). Since Kunsan was considered a remote assignment very few dependents were stationed there (some, but very few). Consequently, we didn't have as many TCN's to choose from.

      --
      ... by the Dew of Mountains the thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning
  19. Re:Beginning Hardware Hacking by crlove · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thanks...I'd been trying it with a match and a tree branch, but I can't seem to get the precision I need. Seriously, any suggestions?

  20. Mirror by SmokeHalo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is a mirror, as I have found the site to be /.'d already.

    --
    I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
    1. Re:Mirror by suso · · Score: 1

      Awww, somehow I was hoping that they would be cooking directly on top of the processors. What a disappointment.

    2. Re:Mirror by Technician · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thanks for the mirror with good photos that shows off the hoax very nicely.

      Hoax??

      Yes.. Here are the facts some of which are taken from the photos.

      In a DC series circuit the current is equal in all parts.

      In a DC circuit Volts * Amps = Watts.

      The 7805 regulator is a linear regulator, not a switching regulator.

      The current for the chips goes from a 12 volt supply through the 5 volt regulator to the chips.

      The regulator drops 7 volts (from 12 to 5) while the chips get 5 volts.

      The current the chips draw goes through the regulator and at about the same current. (the regulator uses some current ot operate)

      From that the regulator has to dump more heat than the chips! To cook the eggs and bacon on the chips, the regulator (without a large heatsink in the photo) would have fried it's own crater in the table top as it would have put out more heat than the chips.

      Since a 7805 is current regulated and thermaly protected, I doubt the chips got more than 7 watts. Every try cooking bacon on a 7 watt night light? It's about the same heat as his hotplate but better concentrated to a small area. A night light would have cooked the bacon better. Even then, it would not be done enough to eat safely.

      Don't be fooled. The eggs and bacon was cooked on a regular stove, not the chips.

      The logo for the article should have been the foot. Then I would have laughed instead of picking the fraud apart. ;-)

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Mirror by zergl · · Score: 1

      It has been a long time since High School (OK, about two years, but one can forget so fast) but IIRC you left out one important point in your calculations: Resistance.

      You point out that the regulator should dump more heat?
      If it got a nice low resistance, I think it should not.

    4. Re:Mirror by iroll · · Score: 1

      'Hoax' and 'fraud' are pretty strong words for what is, with little investigation, obviously a spoof. I mean really; if I posted a link to the Onion on slashdot, that doesn't mean the *article* was a fraud--the scam was that it got past the crack editorial staff.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    5. Re:Mirror by Technician · · Score: 1

      You point out that the regulator should dump more heat?
      If it got a nice low resistance, I think it should not.


      Go back to school. A simi-conductor behaves like a variable resistor. A switching regulator is effecient because it switches on and off while not running in the resistance mode. When it's on it does run very low resistance as you mentioned. It uses an inductor and a steering diode so in a switching regulator (assuming 100% effeciency) it would draw 5 watts from the 12 volt supply not 12 watts to provide 1 amp at 5 volt output. So how do you put in roughly 0.41 amps at 12 volts (5 Watts) and get out 1 amp at 5 volts (5 Watts)? With an inductor or transformer, the current still flows to the output through a diode from ground. The 12 volt pulses are just to create the current in the inductor. A linear regulator does not work that way.

      A Linear regular on the other hand operates in the resistance range. Now ohm's law applies. A 1 amp draw from the 12 volt supply (12 Watts) with a 7 volt drop from 12 volts to 5 volts through the series pass transistor in the regulator is released as 7 watts of heat. The other 5 watts is delivered to the regulator output and is used to cook the bacon on the grill.

      So at the risk of being redundant, if there is a 1 amp draw by the chips at 5 volts (not likely) and the regulator is running in a linear mode (does by design) and assuming the regulator does not draw it's own operating power (it does, but it's small) then my statement is true that the regulator releases more heat than the CPU's. The regulator would release 7 watts while 5 watts is delivered to the bacon and eggs. The 12 volt supply would supply 1 amp or 12 watts of power to the regulator and load combined.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    6. Re:Mirror by Technician · · Score: 1

      'Hoax' and 'fraud' are pretty strong words for what is, obviously a spoof.

      True, but I used those words because Slashodt put the article under hardware, not it's to laugh. I also included the ;-) to indicate I wasn't serious about this being a real fraud or hoax. ;-) I took it for what it was and had some fun with it. I also wanted people to think if what was presented was even possible as it was presented. I put in my reasons why I realised it wasn't real so some could learn real world engineering. Some things look good in concept and on paper until you do the math and find the concept has a serious flaw. In this one, the thermal capacity and power output of the linear regulator is a design flaw that would keep this idea from working. With a beefy regulator that could supply several hundred watts at 5 volts could change the project into something that might have a chance. Then other considerations will need to be addressed such as wire size. 200 watts at 5 volts is 40 amps. I would consider a larger wire size for example to keep the heat out of the wire and in the CPU's.

      We are technical people here. It's a good pratice to do the math.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  21. Google Mirror Site Available by ramsesit · · Score: 4, Informative
  22. Hehe... by Masq666 · · Score: 1

    I've got a box full of old processors and other hardware, maybe i'll build myself one of these.

    --
    Bits of News Giving you the latest bits.
  23. Google's cache by stil__maar · · Score: 1, Informative

    Google is your friend. http://64.233.183.104/search?hl=nl&q=cache%3Ahttp% 3A%2F%2Fwww.rabidhardware.net%2Findex.php%3Fid%3D4 4&btnG=Zoeken&lr=

  24. BOFH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like a chapter from the BOFH cook-book.

  25. Re:Beginning Hardware Hacking by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

    Rubber mallet must be carbon-loaded or include a ground strap to avoid problems with static electricity killing things before you get the chance.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  26. A wonderful insult to Cyrix by British · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know you have failed in the processor market when people are cooking up ideas to use your processors to cook food instead of crunch numbers.

    1. Re:A wonderful insult to Cyrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The day someone will make a heatpipe grill for a p4 processor will be the day when i cancel heating in my room. On the other hand, i didnt use to have a problem with cold with the AMD ~1800 xp+ processor (or thereabouts), in fact my average room temperature fell for about 5C with a 2.6ghz P4. I dont really see the reason for knocking newer P4 chipsets (justified thou) and forgetting to knock on pretty much everything from amd before their 64bit proc. Well.. whatever cooks your lunch..

    2. Re:A wonderful insult to Cyrix by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

      I think it's safe to say that Intel still has the lead in that particular vertical market.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
  27. Since article is /. ed by CmdrGravy · · Score: 4, Funny

    To make a simple processor BBQ just get a big box of old processors, a can of petrol and a metal brazier.

    Put the chips and the petrol in the brazier, set it on fire and cook stuff on top. If the flames begin to die down add more wood, chips ( if you have them ) or any other junk to sustain the heating reaction.

    1. Re:Since article is /. ed by Pionar · · Score: 1

      Put the chips and the petrol in the brazier, set it on fire and cook stuff on top.

      Do I take the brazier off the girlfriend first?

  28. Re:Beginning Hardware Hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pick a project to work on and don't give up. Not a boring project either. Read up on everything you need to learn to finish it.

    Get a breadboard. Get a real electronics soldering iron. Grandpa's old soldering gun won't do, and radio shack 5$ irons won't get you very far, unless you're on a really tight budget.

    See digikey or mouser or the phonebook for electronic parts. Radio Shack won't cut it anymore.

    Visit these, and never stop reading.
    http://www.epanorama.net/
    http://www.di scovercircuits.com/

  29. How efficient would this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compared to a normal 'hot plate'/electric fry pan?

    Could this be something that is actually worth to do?

  30. why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont know why people go to these lengths to make a hotplate. I use my powerbook.

  31. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/19/191621 by kennyj449 · · Score: 1

    How long until someone uses a bunch of TBirds to make a coffee roaster?

  32. I have a quick question... by kirk444 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will my food cook faster if I use processors that support MMX, SSE or 3DNow!?

    1. Re:I have a quick question... by commo1 · · Score: 1

      No, but your fowl will be more colorful and musical with MMX, folding layers will be easier with SSE and with 3DNOW! your souflées will reach new horizontal highs and have incredible depth.

  33. Re:There's some really big stories in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I respectfully disagree. This is a 'fun' topic.

    People like fun. Perhaps you don't know that.

  34. Now what we really need by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

    is to find a way to hardness the latent computer proscessing power of the George Forman Grill. You know it exisits.

  35. Mmmmmm.... yummy by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

    Nothing like a tasty, l33t breakfast... and it's nutrutious, too! (well, more nutritious than the usual l33t f00ds, anyhow)

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  36. Fire for food by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, that is cool. But as I am stuck with an electric stove at home I have a bit of a rant to add.

    Electric coils don't heat evenly, and I always get nasty hot spots when cooking. (Yum, burnt on the left side, raw on the right)

    To get around this nasty problem I use my cast-iron for almost everything I cook. It's big and heavy and disperses the heat better than anything else I own. If you don't have one, a 12" cast iron skillet is one of the best pan investments you can make.

    --
    We are the Borg...
    1. Re:Fire for food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't have one, a 12" cast iron skillet is one of the best pan investments you can make.

      However, the best pot investments you can make have nothing to do with cookware.

  37. Nothing beats... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...cooking with gas.

    Electric stoves are for amateurs.

    Just like electric windings are for armatures.

    Do you see?

    1. Re:Nothing beats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... What he did there? MOD PARENT TRYHARD

    2. Re:Nothing beats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meaned GAS, a part of binutils. Yet I am not sure it would make the processor hotter.

  38. Eggs XP by Rufus211 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I personally preffer to fry my eggs on an Athlon XP. Just make sure it's an original Athlon as new ones run too damn cool.

    1. Re:Eggs XP by Nodar · · Score: 1

      what in the hell is "brown sauce" sounds... tasty.

      --
      Don't Blame me if I seem bitter, I'm at work, and the TV only plays soap operas.
    2. Re:Eggs XP by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      very english, full of crap, but strangely appealing to many

      http://www.hpfoods.com/brands/hpsauce/

  39. Beowulf cluster anyone? by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    altough I say - shit this. Pentium 4 with it's 115W of heat output would be far better suited for this.

    1:0 Intel to Cyrix

  40. Lean Mean Turing... err, Tuxing Machine by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Now what we really need is to find a way to hardness the latent computer proscessing power of the George Forman Grill. You know it exisits.

    Ah, but will it run Linux? (^_-)

    Now, perhaps it might not run on that, but there must be a number of household items with moderate processing power that *could* run some hacked-about form of Linux.

    Question is, which is the least "appropriate" appliance that Linux has been run successfully on? For example digital TV set-top box? Microwave oven? Toaster?

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Lean Mean Turing... err, Tuxing Machine by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "Question is, which is the least "appropriate" appliance that Linux has been run successfully on? For example digital TV set-top box? Microwave oven? Toaster?"

      bah!! No imagination!! Think outside the box! Like coffee maker!

      hair dryer!

      Electric razor!

      Blender!

      garage door opener!

      electric can opener or toothbrush!

      automatic cat litter box!

      mod me up or down i dont care my karma's so high i see stars

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    2. Re:Lean Mean Turing... err, Tuxing Machine by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      bah!! No imagination!! Think outside the box!

      The use of the expression "think outside the box" is one of the most box-constrained uses of language *ever*.

      It reminds me of tedious management ****s who are too damn stupid to see the irony of this.

      So there :-P

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  41. Truth in computing by Gridpoet · · Score: 3, Funny

    well...on the upside... now if someone comes into your room and asks you all sarcastic "are you cooking somthing in here or what?" you can say
    "YES!"

    --

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    This is MY galaxy...go find your OWN!

  42. Missing sentence by lahvak · · Score: 4, Funny

    The sentence that is often missing in articles like this one is "Before proceeding further, make sure you have a back-up copy of your house".

    --
    AccountKiller
  43. Re:Beginning Hardware Hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to do any real work then skip the multimeter and just save for a scopy. You can get one failry cheep and it is really the only way to hack hardware.

    Best of luck.

  44. The word is flak, dammit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  45. Hrm.. by smacktits · · Score: 1

    I think they kept a couple of Cyrixs aside to use in their server.

  46. Re:Beginning Hardware Hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    I recommend saving 5$ for a dictionary as well, to help distinguish between CHEAP (cost effective), and CHEEP (a sound birds make).

    Also, this is 2005. The era for electronics projects is 20-30 years IN THE PAST.

    Save ALL your money, and just BUY whatever it is you need. Chances are, whatever you need, it's already been done, and it's cheaper and better than anything you can throw together.

    Also, a scope is not a substitute for a DMM. You're an idiot for even thinking that, and suggesting it to an amateur should get you a jail term.

  47. Problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem is that you didn't RTFA.

    It plainly says he applied more voltage... so the 20 watts is under normal voltage... he applied more... see what I'm getting at? Yea, RTFA.

  48. whoa, I just said that recently here by AssFace · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here is post of mine on Slashdot where I mentioned that a CPU hotplate would be cool.

    Just for future reference if we are going to make my posts come true - I'd like a Porsche or Paris Hilton.

    Thanks.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:whoa, I just said that recently here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...I'd like a Porsche or Paris Hilton."

      The Porsche I can understand.

      But Paris, the most slept-in Hilton of them all...?

  49. Re:Beginning Hardware Hacking by yasth · · Score: 3, Informative

    Get a decent soldering station with sponge and adjustable wattage (or if you really want to spend money adjustable temperature.) They are suprisingly affordable, also for a while you won't need a soldering ironas much as you will need a breadboard and lots of wire.

    Just about any multimeter will do, even a $5 analog one, most of the time it is more a question of presence and magnitude rather then particular readings. (Though the nicer ones do have some cool features).

    Look at http://www.sparkfun.com/ for your starting out. Lots of tutorials, a forum, a well stocked supportive store, and unlike digikey it has a limited enough selection that you won't feel like you are paging through a large city's phone book.

    Do eventually sign up for digikey/mouser/future etc. catalogs though, just don't let them intimidate you.

    The real hard part is finding a project.

    --
    I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
  50. hard to believe by VAXman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a hard time believing this. What are the processors actually doing? If you simply power up processors without being connected to chipset or memory they won't do a whole lot. Most likely it would get through reset (assuming reset doesn't do any chipset queries, etc.), then put out a Code Fetch for the reset vector, which would never come back, then it would go into some sort of shutdown state. So I find it hard to believe that just powering up processors would produce that much heat. There are specific workloads which could be used to maximize power throughput, but obviously they are not at work here.

    1. Re:hard to believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been pointed out earlier that the 7805 can only provide 1.5A of current. Do the maths: 5V*1.5A=7.5 Watts...not enough to run 1 processor, let alone 7, and certainly nowhere near what you'd need to cook.

      Perhaps I can sell CmdrTaco the Brooklyn Bridge...

  51. In recent news. by IncidentA5 · · Score: 0

    The power output of the new P4 6xx series is supposed to be much much higher than these. Could'nt you literally fry an egg with just one of these $800 monsters? 3.7ghz P4 EE vs Athlon 64 3500+ 223 Watts > 114 Watts http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx? i=2353&p=4

  52. Re:Beginning Hardware Hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does any of that matter to someone just doing electronics as a hobby? By that logic yada yada yada and I don't even need to finish that sentence.

    Agreed on the last line though.

  53. Re:http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/19/191 by peawee03 · · Score: 1

    I have a 1.3 GHz TBird that the old CPU cooler died with, so I replaced it with an XP cooler. I had to mount it off-center, because of the mobo capicitors getting in the way. So it didn't connect with my CPU correctly. It went from room temperature to 80 C in about 20 seconds sitting on the bios screen.

    --
    I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
  54. check schematic by wsanders · · Score: 1

    The article is completely /.ed but a high power supply could use a 7805 as a reference voltage. It's cheaper and more reliable than a zener.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:check schematic by YankeeInExile · · Score: 1

      Schematic was checked before my first posting, a later AC's post notwithstanding. It shows the 12V rail from a PC power supply going into a 7805 and feeding all of the CPUs from the output. This was, in fact, what caused me to post in the first place

      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
  55. Re:Beginning Hardware Hacking by crlove · · Score: 1

    Thanks to everyone who is actually helpful and not just being an ass. Yes, I do realize I can buy the electronics myself at what is probably a lower cost. That's not the point. I want to actually LEARN something. And smashing apart an iPod when I don't know much about electronics isn't really going to help me accomplish that (as fun as it would be).

  56. Re:There's some really big stories in the world by Krojack · · Score: 1

    All work and no play makes Anonymous Coward a dull boy...

  57. Mod parent up! by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    I was wondering the same thing: how was he going to get 20 Watts of power out of each chip when he was only supply 5 Volts at 1 Amp (ie, 5 Watts) - of course, that would only be for a single chip, with the parallel implementation he built it is much less than that.

    This has to be a "joke" - while in theory it would work if everything was connected properly, in actuality I bet it does nothing (just hooking up voltage isn't going to heat it up very much anyhow - you have to actually do something with the processor, like processing, to really get the heat out of it)...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:Mod parent up! by arodland · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I didn't think about the current maths, but I was sure it was a spoof when I realized he wasn't even _clocking_ the chips. They're not going to draw nearly as much power that way. :)

  58. Bah by first.last · · Score: 0

    If you REALLY want to impress people, build a refridgerator powered by one.

    --
    Wishing I was a millionaire since 1969.
  59. Poor Gil by PaisteUser · · Score: 1

    Too bad Ole' Gill only had 1 payment left on his hotplate, he might have to finance this one too.

    --
    root@allevil:~#
  60. Re:There's some really big stories in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, loosen your panties.

  61. Launch! by Finkbug · · Score: 1

    I particularly liked how the shadow, chair, and booze accidentally came together in the screenie to suggest a crossbow cocked and ready to shoot a bottle of Canadian Club (at any Cyrix chip designer storming the digital heights?).

    --
    Feeling so good natured I could drool
  62. I'm no forensic expert here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but why does the toast have grill lines on it? I call hoax.

  63. Pegs my bogometer by LordByronStyrofoam · · Score: 1

    A 7805 voltage regulator in TO-220 package (which appears to be what was used) can deliver, at most, 1 amp. At 5 volts, that's 5 watts max being delivered to the CPUs. And that's when the 7805 has a good heat sink. The 7805, when fed by 12V, must itself dissipate 7 watts as heat. See here. This was rigged.

    --
    Slashdot's name? When my compiler sees /. it generates a warning about a badly formed comment.
  64. I still prefer my VAX 11/750 space heater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heh

  65. Regulator would get hotter than the processors! by EvilMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

    Connecting the 7805 regulator as shown to knock down the 12V rail to 5V means that at the 7805's short circuit current limit of 2.1A, the regulator will make (12-5=7) 7V*2.1A=14.7 Watts whereas the procs will dissipate 5V*2.1A=10.5 Watts. In other words, the only thing I can see outputting enough power to even warm the pan is the meter on my bs detector.

    7805 DataSheet

  66. you can't cook bacon with 5 watts by rsw · · Score: 1

    This article is bullshit. He's putting out 5 watts. You absolutely cannot cook an egg or bacon on 5 watts. That's like trying to cook the egg by rubbing a piece of rough cloth over the shell really fast.

    Why was this not obvious to the OP and the mods? Jeezus what a waste of bandwidth.

    -rsw

  67. Why would I be interested in this? by gitana · · Score: 1

    Why would I be interested in this? .... the heat radiating off my aluminum 12inch Powerbook is more than sufficient for most geek cooking needs. It's a feature, not a bug!!!

  68. Easy-Bake by hanshotfirst · · Score: 1

    Is this how they implemented the easy-bake oven in a drive bay? (slashdot article from April 1, 2004 or was it 2003?) [too lame to link]

    --
    Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
  69. Void where prohibited by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 0

    I don't know about other parts of the world, but if I void where prohibited I'm liable to be arrested.

    --
    Where's the Kaboom?
    There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
  70. Oh man by 2names · · Score: 1
    The rhythmic thumping noise you hear is an FCC compliance officer banging his head on his desk.

    THAT was funny.

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  71. What if? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you put the processors to solve some floating point, will they deliver more cooking wattage?

  72. A waste - Cyrix VALUABLE for pinball by Krellan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bad idea to just burn up old Cyrix chips: if you have a Cyrix motherboard of just the right make and model, you can flip it on Ebay as it will be quite valuable.

    The reason is that Williams Pinball made their final two pinball machines with Cyrix motherboards, before going out of business in 1999: "Revenge From Mars" and "Star Wars Episode I".

    Because they went out of business before completing their plans to make the game software more portable to newer motherboards, these pinball machines work ONLY with these certain Cyrix motherboards!

    The motherboard is Cyrix MediaGX, BAT form factor, with the CX5520 bridge. Not CX5510, and not CX5530. CPU speed should be 233 Mhz (33x7), but 266 and 200 are also rumoured to work.

    A motherboard that matches this description is quite rare these days, and sells for $300 or more -- ironically, twice the price of that motherboard when it was new!

    So, if you have an old Cyrix motherboard sitting around, it just might be a gold mine, think of that before melting those chips onto a hotplate....

    1. Re:A waste - Cyrix VALUABLE for pinball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly enough, i have that exact same board (with the CX5520 bridge) gathering dust in a closet. I used it to breath some life into an old Mac 6-7 years ago. Still works although parts have been scavenged off the machine at some time, the modified floppy drive for one. http://www.imagehosting.us/imagehosting/showimg.jp g/?id=266702

  73. Dont Forget by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    an 8" job for cooking cornbread

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  74. Smaller than a Perq by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

    I'll give it that.