Slashdot Mirror


Linux Kernel 2.6.11 Released

Xpilot writes "Linus Torvalds has just announced the availability of the newest Linux kernel release, 2.6.11. The newest addition to Linux that's stirring up some excitement is the inclusion of Infiniband support. You can get it from the usual mirrors at http://kernel.org/mirrors."

312 comments

  1. To Infiniband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    And beyond!

    1. Re:To Infiniband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2.6.11 breaks the nVidia graphics drivers.

      /tmp/selfgz2313/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr /src/nv/os-agp.c:444: erro r: request for member `unbind_memory' in something not a structure or union /tmp/selfgz2313/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr /src/nv/os-agp.c:445: erro r: request for member `free_memory' in something not a structure or union make[4]: *** [/tmp/selfgz2313/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/us r/src/nv/os-a gp.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [_module_/tmp/selfgz2313/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629 -pkg1/usr/src /nv] Error 2 make[2]: *** [modules] Error 2 NVIDIA: left KBUILD. nvidia.ko failed to build! make[1]: *** [module] Error 1 make: *** [module] Error 2 -> Error. ERROR: Unable to build the NVIDIA kernel module.

      See?

  2. infiniband..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    does that mean it goes PAST 11?

    1. Re:infiniband..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nigel: "You're up to 11 on your server and up to 11 on your network and you need that extra little push to set it over the top and you got nowhere else to go. So this amp goes to infinity."

      Interviewer: "I see. But why not just make 11 louder?"

      Nigel: "But it goes to infinity."

      Interviewer: "Yeah, but what if you just made 11 as loud as infinity?"

      Nigel: "But...it goes to infinity."

    2. Re:infiniband..... by eric2hill · · Score: 1

      Waaay past 11. It goes to plaid.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
    3. Re:infiniband..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and past the water cooler!

    4. Re:infiniband..... by wootest · · Score: 1

      Yes, to 42.

  3. Knoppix jumped the gun... by carninja · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like Knoppix jumped the gun by including the 2.6 kernel in the new distro. If they had just waited a few hours...

    1. Re:Knoppix jumped the gun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So how long would you wait with a new release? Till everyone confirms that there will be no new minor version of the kernel, KDE, gnome, gcc, mplayer, gaim etc. release in the next 3 month??

      And if InfiniBand really is the big thing in 2.6.11, most Linux users couldn't care less anyway...

    2. Re:Knoppix jumped the gun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, all those people waiting to boot their supercomputers using Knoppix to take advantage of Infiniband will just have to keep waiting.

    3. Re:Knoppix jumped the gun... by northcat · · Score: 2, Informative

      The release of knoppix was announced few hours ago but things like the kernel are added much earlier. Like days or weeks earlier. They're not added at the last minute, because distro maintainence is a tough job. And many times ditros contain not the latest version of programs available at the time of the release. There are a lot of reasons. On a side note, people who want infiniband will be able to update the kernel on the knoppix cd.

    4. Re:Knoppix jumped the gun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you jumped the gun by posting a moronic comment...If you had just waited until you had a clue...like that the new Knoppix isn't even at 2.6.10, which came out a lot more than a few hours ago. Sheesh.

  4. infiniband? by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    InfiniBand, which is derived from its underlying concept of "infinite bandwidth,"...

    Umm... I don't know about you... but that description didn't help me much... infinite bandwidth? What is this? How is this? How does linux get past physical hardware limitations that other os's can't?

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:infiniband? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      it is quite easy: magic

    2. Re:infiniband? by stecoop · · Score: 5, Informative

      Google knows all.

      Intell talks about Infiniband Architecture

      Initially InfiniBand Technology will be used to connect servers with remote storage and networking devices, and other servers. It will also be used inside servers for inter-processor communication (IPC) in parallel clusters. Customers requiring dense server deployments, such as ISPs, will also benefit from the small form factors being proposed. Other benefits include greater performance, lower latency, easier and faster sharing of data, built in security and quality of service, improved usability (the new form factor will be far easier to add/remove/upgrade than today's shared-bus I/O cards).

      Additionally, InfiniBand Architecture reduces total cost of ownership by focusing on data center reliability and scalability. The technology addresses reliability by creating multiple redundant paths between nodes (reducing hardware that needs to be purchased). It also moves from the load-and-store-based communications methods used by shared local bus I/O to a more reliable message passing approach.

      Scalability needs are addressed in two ways. First, the I/O fabric itself is designed to scale without encountering the latencies that some shared bus I/O architectures experience as workload increases. Second, the physical modularity of InfiniBand Technology will avoid the need for customers to buy excess capacity up-front in anticipation of future growth. Instead, they will be able to buy what they need at the outset and 'pay as they grow' to add capacity without impacting operations or installed systems.

    3. Re:infiniband? by dhbiker · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.infinibandta.org/ibta/ I think infinite bandwidth is more thatn a little misleading! but to take an excerpt from their marketing blurb "The first version of the specification for the technology was completed in October 2000 and the InfiniBand Trade Association is well on its way to establishing a new signaling rate specification beyond 100Gb/s"

    4. Re:infiniband? by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1
      Perhaps it has something to do with it's ability to finish infinite loops, as Linus would say...

      We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.

      -- Linus Torvalds

    5. Re:infiniband? by Kjella · · Score: 4, Funny

      How does linux get past physical hardware limitations that other os's can't?

      Marketing. They transcend the physically possible on a regular basis. Though you missed the source. "How does [InfiniBand] get past physical hardware limitations that other [hardware] can't?" It is their marketing fluff, Linux merely supports the technology.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:infiniband? by micromoog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So what is it in non-marketing terms?

    7. Re:infiniband? by TuringTest · · Score: 2, Informative

      Linked from the article:

      Infiniband (define)

      Both an I/O architecture and a specification for the transmission of data between processors and I/O devices that has been gradually replacing the PCI bus in high-end servers and PCs. Instead of sending data in parallel, which is what PCI does, InfiniBand sends data in serial and can carry multiple channels of data at the same time in a multiplexing signal. The principles of InfiniBand mirror those of mainframe computer systems that are inherently channel-based systems. InfiniBand channels are created by attaching host channel adapters (HCAs) and target channel adapters (TCAs) through InfiniBand switches. HCAs are I/O engines located within a server. TCAs enable remote storage and network connectivity into the InfiniBand interconnect infrastructure, called a fabric. InfiniBand architecure is capable of supporting tens of thousands of nodes in a single subnet.

      InfiniBand is a trademarked term. The technology is a result of the merger of two competing designs -- Future I/O, which was developed by Compaq, IBM and Hewlett-Packard, and Next Generation I/O, which was developed by Intel, Microsoft and Sun Microsystems. InfiniBand was previously called System I/O.

      InfiniBand transmission rates begin at 2.5GBps.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    8. Re:infiniband? by MrHanky · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a rift in the time-space continuum.

    9. Re:infiniband? by dsginter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Umm... I don't know about you... but that description didn't help me much... infinite bandwidth? What is this? How is this?

      Agreed.

      They should have called it "SynerBand" as in, "Synergized Bandwidth". Alternatively, eSynerBand-Numa.iFlex2@@@ would have been a good choice.

      --
      More
    10. Re:infiniband? by wootest · · Score: 5, Informative

      Virginia Tech used Infiniband to wire up their G5 cluster. It's basically very fast I/O with some good logic built-in - "The technology addresses reliability by creating multiple redundant paths between nodes (reducing hardware that needs to be purchased)." is basically the same as the change from linear, Token Ring-ish networks to big Ethernet meshes like the Internet. I don't claim to know much at all about this, but seemingly it's the superior alternative today, and it sounds like it should be as well.

    11. Re:infiniband? by Tomcat666 · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Two Worlds - One Sun [Spirit]
    12. Re:infiniband? by pomakis · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think infinite bandwidth is more thatn a little misleading! but to take an excerpt from their marketing blurb "The first version of the specification for the technology was completed in October 2000 and the InfiniBand Trade Association is well on its way to establishing a new signaling rate specification beyond 100Gb/s"

      100Gb/s? Then they're almost there! I'm sure infinity isn't much bigger than that.

    13. Re:infiniband? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a serial I/O connection.

      I'm more familiar with Mainframe Channel IO, but:

      Its like SATA, but the wires are longer and can go from your PC to a disk tower in the next room, and you can have IO devices talking directly to each other, or one device can be shared between two computers.

    14. Re:infiniband? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a clusterfuck.

    15. Re:infiniband? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a way to increase complexity in a network so geeks can justify a bigger paycheck.

    16. Re:infiniband? by suso · · Score: 1, Funny

      is basically the same as the change from linear, Token Ring-ish networks to big Ethernet meshes ...

      Is that like Tolkien Elv-ish?

    17. Re:infiniband? by Daniel · · Score: 1

      If you use TeX, infinity is 10000, so they only have two orders of magnitude to go!

      Daniel

      --
      Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
    18. Re:infiniband? by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      Think of it like better than PCI. PCI is a parallel bus, InfiniBand is a serial interconenct bus. It's like SCSI vs. FireWire and serial ATA. Transfer rates for InfiniBand start at 2.5GBps.

      More information:
      http://inews.webopedia.com/TERM/I/InfiniBand.html
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infiniband

      --
      this is my sig
    19. Re:infiniband? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      100Gb/s ought to be enough for anyone.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    20. Re:infiniband? by StandardDeviant · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is mysterious and powerful. In fact, it's mystery is only exceeded by its power. ;)

    21. Re:infiniband? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      In this O'Reilly article, they correctly state the 1x data rate as 2.5 Gbit/sec, not 2.5 GByte/sec.

      That's the same as a 64 bit 78 MHz parallel interface - not that impressive.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    22. Re:infiniband? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      In this O'Reilly article, they correctly state the 1x data rate as 2.5 Gbit/sec, not 2.5 GByte/sec.

      That's the same as a 64 bit wide 78 MHz parallel interface - not that impressive.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    23. Re:infiniband? by Nimrangul · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was thinking before I replied to this, because I know a reponse that is funny to me, goes like this: So what is it? Then when explained the response is: So what is it? Then when explained again the response is: So what is it? Only kidding. But jeese, does anyone watch Red Dwarf anymore? Most people would just think I am a jackass, not that they'd be wrong.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    24. Re:infiniband? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It's still not as much bandwidth as a delivery truck full of hard drives.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    25. Re:infiniband? by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      Cat: "So what is it?"
      Lister: "Statis preserves time, so a leak must preserve time and this one leads into this room."
      Cat: "So what is it?"
      Kryton: "It's a rip in the time-space continuum."
      Cat: "So what is it?"
      Lister: "It's a doorway through time."
      Cat: "Oh, a magic door, why didn't you just tell me?"

    26. Re:infiniband? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    27. Re:infiniband? by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      Thanks :-)

    28. Re:infiniband? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there an echo in here?

    29. Re:infiniband? by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Umm... I don't know about you... but that description didn't help me much... infinite bandwidth? What is this? How is this? How does linux get past physical hardware limitations that other os's can't?

      My own understanding is hazy but basically you can think of Infiniband as a replacement for PCI, SCSI and Ethernet. Imagine having an AMD64 with an nvidia card and a P4 with an ati card, and having the AMD64 communicate with the ati card. That's what Infiniband permits. You can use Infiniband to hook up the internal disks, external disks, video cards, your local LAN, etc. This has important ramifications for clusters. Imagine having 10 computers and a single master computer streaming audio to all 10 audio controllers simultaneously. The master computer uses the 10 audio controllers directly via the Infiniband switched fabric. The operating systems on the other 9 computers don't need to waste their time handling the data. The audio controller is no longer "hidden" behind the CPU, needing the CPUs help to get audio data to and from the network. The audio controller is on the network.

      Each Infiniband port is 10Gbps, which is fast for serial. By comparison, Firewire800 is 800Mbps, Ethernet is 1Gbps, and FibreChannel is 2Gbps. But the real kicker is that Infiniband is very low latency. Ethernet would be useless for replacing PCI, but Infiniband is practical.

      For devices that need more bandwidth they can use multiple Infiniband ports in parallel. Notice how similar this sounds to PCI Express. With PCI Express the idea was that simple cards (eg, audio controllers) would use a single PCIe channel, but video cards might use 16 channels. PCI Express is switched, just like Infiniband. PCI Express has similar low-latency properties.

      The big question now is, will Infiniband or PCI Express win in the marketplace? My money is on PCI Express because efforts have been made to be backwards compatible with PCI. The host interface is identical to PCI; you don't need to change a single line of code in an operating system to use a PCIe motherboard with PCIe peripherals.

    30. Re:infiniband? by eggnet · · Score: 1

      That's the same as a 64 bit 78 MHz parallel interface - not that impressive.

      Actually, lower minimums would be more impressive, as would higher maximums.

      Lower minimums allow cheaper devices, higher maximums allow more functionality.

    31. Re:infiniband? by eggnet · · Score: 1

      That would be unimpressive if it was the maximum bandwidth, but it's not.

    32. Re:infiniband? by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      It's still not as much bandwidth as a delivery truck full of hard drives.

      Not true, plugging in a truck full of hd's into machines to get the data off will negate any gains from shipping a truck full of drives.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    33. Re:infiniband? by TheOrquithVagrant · · Score: 1

      Well, it depends. From a practical point view, you could say that you have "infinite bandwidth" the moment you have more bandwith in the interconnect than the connected equipment could fill even under peak theoretical throughput. For example, in a supercomputing cluster, if you interconnect is faster than the combined memory bandwidth of all connected nodes, you would pretty much have "infinite bandwidth".
      Otoh, 100Gb/sec doesn't sound like it comes even close to that, for a decent size cluster of modern nodes. I seem to remember the NUMA backplane on SGI's Origin 3000 servers having something like 760GB/sec... That, otoh, might almost fit the bill.

    34. Re:infiniband? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Cat: Is that what I think it is?!
      Lister: What do you think it is?
      Cat: A big orange swirly thing in space!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...before the site is slashdotted...

    The Linux world is bracing for the final release of the new Linux 2.6.11 kernel, which will include a long list of driver updates and patches, with InfiniBand support perhaps being one of most interesting new additions.

    Late last night, Linux creator Linus Torvalds issued the fifth release candidate for the 2.6.11 kernel. The first 2.6.11 RC was issued on Jan. 12; the second on Jan 21; the third on Feb. 2; and the fourth on Feb. 12.

    In the RC5 posting, Torvalds indicated that it was likely the last RC before the final release.

    "Hey, I hoped -- rc4 was the last one, but we had some laptop resource conflicts, various ppc TLB flush issues, some possible stack overflows in networking and a number of other details warranting a quick -- rc5 before the final 2.6.11," Torvalds wrote.

    "This time it's really supposed to be a quickie, so people who can, please check it out, and we'll make the real 2.6.11 asap."

    The long list of updates in the 2.6.11 kernel includes architecture updates for x86-64, ia64, ppc, arm and mips, as well as updates to ACPI (define), DRI (Direct Rendering Infrastructure, which permits direct access to graphics hardware for X Window System users), ALSA (Advanced Linux Sound Architecture, which provides MIDI and audio functionality to the Linux), SCSI (define) and the XFS high-performance journaling filesystem.

    The 2.6.11 kernel will also be significant in that it includes driver support for the InfiniBand (define) interconnect architecture. InfiniBand, which is derived from its underlying concept of "infinite bandwidth," is a switched fabric interconnect technology for high-performance network devices that is common in a number of supercomputer clusters.

    The upcoming inclusion of InfiniBand support in the Linux kernel is a major step according to the InfiniBand Trade Association.

    "The inclusion of InfiniBand drivers in the upstream Linux kernel is a significant milestone," Ross Schibler, CTO of InfiniBand vendor Topspin Communications, told internetnews.com.

    InfiniBand support was available previously in various Linux distributions, but it wasn't part of the mainstream kernel.org Linux.

    "This now means that anyone that downloads a kernel will have automatic access to the software," explained Schibler. "It also means that any upcoming distributions (Red Hat, SUSE, etc.) will have the software included on their CDs. Previously SUSE had it on a distribution, but only in the 'unsupported' directory."

    Schibler sees the inclusion of InfiniBand as a testament to the maturation of the technology.

    "Now that the technology has matured to such a point that Linus has accepted it into the kernel, the way is paved for greater distribution of the code and accelerated deployment of the technology," Schibler said.

    The previous Linux kernel.org release, version 2.6.10 was issued on Dec. 24 after two release candidates. Linux distribution began including the 2.6.10 thereafter with Red Hat's Fedora Project being one of the first.

    Fedora Core 3 initially shipped with the 2.6.9 kernel and then upgraded to the 2.6.10 kernel on Jan 13. Mandrakelinux's 10.2 Beta 3 also includes the 2.6.10 release. SUSE Linux 9.2 currently includes the 2.6.8 kernel.

    Including the most recent kernel into a distribution is not a particularly easy task. The upcoming Debian, code-named Sarge, will only ship with the 2.6.8 kernel. In a release update e-mail, Debian Sarge release manager Andreas Barth related that a meeting was recently held to review the status of which kernel they would include.

    "The team leads involved eventually decided to stay with kernel 2.6.8 and 2.4.27, rather than bumping the 2.6 kernel to 2.6.10," Barth wrote. "This decision was made upon review of the known bugs in each of the 2.6 kernel versions; despite some significant bugs in the Debian 2.6.8 kernel tree, these bugs were weighed against the additional delays that a kernel version bump would introduce in t

    1. Re:Article text by Kirth · · Score: 1

      Yay, there really are reasons NOT to include anything above 2.6.8 into a distribution. Most notable of them that somebody broke it on Sparc.

      --
      "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
    2. Re:Article text by strider44 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ross Schibler, CTO of InfiniBand vendor Topspin Communications, told internetnews.com. . . . "Now that the technology has matured to such a point that Linus has accepted it into the kernel, the way is paved for greater distribution of the code and accelerated deployment of the technology," Schibler said.

      That makes for an interesting comment, previously people have been ignoring linux and gunning for windows.

    3. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's OK, I'll just put my million dollar InfiniBand cluster on hold until Linux is working on the $50 Sparc computer some hobbiest dabbler bought on ebay.

    4. Re:Article text by eobanb · · Score: 1

      You mentioned an update to XFS. I remember one time I had a friend whose new Debian install wouldn't boot because the root partition wouldn't mount correctly for one reason or another. I asked him what filesystem he was using, and he said, "hang on, let me check," and he watched the kernel messages scroll by and saw "xfs" (which of course stands for x font server) and so determined that he was using XFS. It took quite a long time to convince him that Debian stable was not quite that cutting-edge.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    5. Re:Article text by nosfucious · · Score: 1

      Obviously, it's server buyers that are the target market for this technology.

      Windows is merely one of the possible options on a server. Linux and other Unix-likes are others.

      --
      Q:I was listening to a CD in Grip and it sounded horrible! What's up? A:Perhaps you are listening to country music
  6. SCSI Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is off-topic but I'll ask anyway because a lot of people want to know.

    I have to patch the vanilla kernel in the following way so that cdrecord works for non-root users.

    --- drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c 2005-02-28 11:14:10.000000000 +0000
    +++ drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c 2005-02-28 11:14:42.000000000 +0000
    @@ -228,9 +228,9 @@
    return -EINVAL;
    if (copy_from_user(cmd, hdr->cmdp, hdr->cmd_len))
    return -EFAULT;
    - if (verify_command(file, cmd))
    +/* if (verify_command(file, cmd))
    return -EPERM;
    -
    +*/ /*
    * we'll do that later
    */

    I don't want to have to do this of course, because it's a potential security breach.

    Question: is there a user space solution to this? Has anyone coded the Linux micro-permissions into cdrecord yet? Solaris is supported but not Linux. Is this a political issue?

    1. Re:SCSI Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of burying his head in the sand why doesn't the moderator attempt to answer the question or leave it alone so someone else can.

      The question is how can cdrecord be run as non-root in the 2.6.x series without patching the kernel? This is a serious issue. Not with the kernel itself but with the user land tools.

    2. Re:SCSI Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No actual discussion of Linux 2.6.11 is allowed here, only stupid jokes and virtual blowjobs for the developers.

    3. Re:SCSI Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I'm not using 2.6 (yet?) but here's what I found that might help you:

      http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/20 04 -October/008335.html

      HTH

    4. Re:SCSI Permissions by JerkBoB · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have to patch the vanilla kernel in the following way so that cdrecord works for non-root users.

      Perhaps I'm being dense, but why go through the trouble of patching the kernel? Why not just set up sudo? Something like the following would allow anyone in the cdrom group to run 'sudo cdrecord ...' with no password:

      %cdrom ALL=NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/cdrecord

      You could even set up an alias like this: alias cdrecord='sudo cdrecord' so that you don't have to remember the sudo bit.

      Call me crazy, but patching your kernel every time just to be able to record CDRs seems silly. I can understand not wanting to be root to use cdrecord, though.

      And actually, the more I think about it, why can't you just change the permissions on the devices(s) to be group-writable by some group (e.g. cdrom) and make your users part of that group? I feel like I must be missing something.

      I dunno. Seems like there are two very easy solutions to your issue, but maybe I don't understand the scope of the problem.

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    5. Re:SCSI Permissions by phorm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's mine. It allows all users to run CD-burning apps as root via sudo:

      ALL ALL=NOPASSWD:/usr/bin/xcdroast, /usr/bin/cdrecord

    6. Re:SCSI Permissions by shredwheat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are more to the issues than device permissions. The main part of it is that cdrecord needs to lock some of its buffers into non-swappable memory. This is a priveledged operation in an unpatched kernel.

      I believe the patches allow trusted(?) applications to lock small amounts of this memory without requiring root.

      Something like that, I follow along enough to know what's going on, but don't understand everything to it.

    7. Re:SCSI Permissions by JerkBoB · · Score: 2, Informative
      I believe the patches allow trusted(?) applications to lock small amounts of this memory without requiring root.

      Hmm... I haven't heard anything about this, but my gut response is bafflement. What's wrong with setuid or sudo? Why reinvent the wheel? (no pun intended)

      /me shrugs

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    8. Re:SCSI Permissions by anpe · · Score: 1

      "What's wrong with setuid or sudo?"

      In case a security hole is found for your app you would this would compromise the entire system. Only allowing small chunks of non lockable memory is much more secure.

    9. Re:SCSI Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remember that you can get root by using RSH as device through setuided root cdrecord?
      no?>

    10. Re:SCSI Permissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't this allow normal users to burn files that they have no permissions to access?

      What if somebody does "sudo cdrecord /proc/kcore" ?

      I'd suggest that you allow users to run only "cdrecord -" and then educate your users to do

      sudo cdrecord someimagefile.iso

    11. Re:SCSI Permissions by dsd · · Score: 2, Informative

      It should work fine, provided that:

      - You are using a recent kernel (2.6.11 includes a fix for the command filter, please upgrade...)
      - You have write access to /dev/cdrom
      - You are using cdrecord -dev=/dev/cdrom (using dev=ATAPI will *not* work)
      - You are using a recent cdrecord
      - You have an MMC-compliant cd writer. (Some of the less common ones which follow non-standard command sets will inevitably have problems at this point in time)
      - cdrecord must not setuid root (I think this problem may be fixed in the latest version, but make sure it is not setuid just to be sure)

      If you are really getting problems after confirming that you are running a sane setup, then you should check the "dmesg" output. For any command that Linux rejects, it will print out a message the first time it rejects it. This will be in the form of something like: Unknown opcode 4d

      Once you have that opcode, maybe someone will be kind enough to look it up in the SCSI specs for you and see if it can safely be permitted in the kernel command filter.

  7. For those who dont know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Infiniband is the home planet of Buzz Lightyear

  8. Re:Linux is a kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Absolutely correct. Linux is clearly no higher rank than major.

  9. Mac laptops by colinleroy · · Score: 4, Informative

    And G4 laptops with an ATI finally get sleep support thanks to BenH's work!

    (I know, "why would you want to run Linux on a Mac". Don't bother asking).

    --
    blah
    1. Re:Mac laptops by DenDave · · Score: 1

      My trusty Ibook will be pleased, it's a bit tired now... tonight a compile and sleepy time.. Yeah, some of us like uptimes on laptops... ;)

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    2. Re:Mac laptops by oneeyedelf1 · · Score: 1

      Powerbooks are deffinately one sexy laptop. And it only makes sence to run your favorite OS on it. So if you love linux, run linux.

    3. Re:Mac laptops by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Er... doesn't Linus use Mac hardware?

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    4. Re:Mac laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er.. Is it a known fact that Linus is not a jerk?

    5. Re:Mac laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must mean

      _more_ G4 laptops with an ATI finally get sleep support thanks to BenH's work!

      mine has slept fine all the time i have run linux on it, about 6 months (as in has been able to, not that it has been unresponsive for that time)

    6. Re:Mac laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want to run anything else?
      If for some reason a Mac ever comes in possession, it will immediately get a copy of Gentoo PPC

    7. Re:Mac laptops by niko9 · · Score: 1

      And G4 laptops with an ATI finally get sleep support thanks to BenH's work!

      Does sleep support work on MAC desktops with linux? Meaning, can I hit the power button and watch that cute LED snore?

    8. Re:Mac laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, it's a Mac as in Macintosh. Not a MAC as in MAC Address.

  10. someone tell nvidia! by Mondongo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm running 2.6.10 and the NVidia X Driver won't compile against it ... someone tell NVidia to keep up with this!

    1. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm running 2.6.10 and the NVidia X Driver does compile against it ... someone tell NVidia they are keeping up with this!

    2. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      I upgraded to 2.6.10 yesterday (with typically bad timing) and had no problems with the Nvidia drivers. I compiled them, rebooted and X.org appeared in all its glory. This was on a gentoo system. Have you got the latest version of the drivers from Nvidia?

    3. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Skater · · Score: 1

      For me, it compiles fine - but it doesn't actually work. The driver isn't clearing the screen correctly - for example, I'll see the "login" prompt sitting directly on top of the Nvidia splash screen.

      I just upgraded to a new ABIT motherboard, so the problem is likely related to the kernel's AGP workings of that, not the NVIDIA driver.

      Maybe 2.6.11 will fix whatever the problem is. (I haven't nailed it down enough yet to supply a useful bug report.)

    4. Re:someone tell nvidia! by dhbiker · · Score: 1

      I think that Nvidia have to release a new version of the driver almost every time a new kernel is released, typically they do it pretty quick but it is a bit of an annoyance.

      If they would just drop they're stance of open sourcing the driver will reveal trade secrets the kernel team could take on the driver development and things like this would be avoided

    5. Re:someone tell nvidia! by archen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What distro do you use? It works for me using Gentoo, but I also use the unstable nvidia drivers (because I couldn't get the "stable" ones to work months back).

      Which reminds me, when is Linus going to leave the 2.6x tree alone so we don't have to worry about so much broken shit all the time? Imagine if Windows changed it's kernel a couple times a year and broke the video drivers each time. People would bitch endlessly, but I guess as Linux users, we just have to put up with it.

    6. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is with the 6629 drivers. Switch back to the 6611 drivers until NVidia decides to fix the problem. Your problem has had a lot of documentation on various forums and I personally had this problem with 2.6.10. Good luck, it can give quite a headache!

    7. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Proculation · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might have to patch your kernel even with the version 6611 of the drivers. The newest drivers by nvidia and 2.6.10 left me with a black screen when starting X.

    8. Re:someone tell nvidia! by northcat · · Score: 1

      Can't you see the flaw in your logic? If you're that stupid, here's what I mean: Don't upgrade to a new kernel if you don't want problems. With Windows you don't have the option to do otherwise, but with Linux, you do.

    9. Re:someone tell nvidia! by bubkus_jones · · Score: 1

      And buy from who? Or should he just do without a video card?

    10. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      It works for me using Gentoo, but I also use the unstable nvidia drivers (because I couldn't get the "stable" ones to work months back).

      I had to do the same thing with Gentoo, but the stable drivers seem to be fixed now.

    11. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong... Sometimes one needs to update his kernel to fix security holes and other random bugs. So which one i choose? The insecure kernel and games or the secure kernel without games?

    12. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The driver is mostly open source. They use an open source abstraction layer to interface their driver with the Linux kernel. There have been quite a few patches including various 2.6.x patches and a Cedega fix.

    13. Re:someone tell nvidia! by dhbiker · · Score: 1

      Someone mod the parent up as insightful!

      I had no idea on this, I wrongly assumed (as most people probably do) that the driver was completely closed

    14. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not their fault that the Linux developers change the kernel interfaces every version. Learn some software engineering principles, people!

    15. Re:someone tell nvidia! by agurkan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      • It is very rare that you have to upgrade the kernel, check if you need to, before upgrading.
      • Nvidia drivers are kernel modules, so you need to run their installation program every time you upgrade the kernel, since hookups in the kernel may change and a module compiled for a given version of kernel may not work flawlessly with another version. This does not mean upgrade breaks video drivers, if you had to rewrite the drivers, then I would call it breaking.
      • You are barking at the wrong tree. If Nvidia release the source for their drivers, then it could be included in the kernel tree and you would not need to upgrade drivers seperately. That is not going to happen in foreseeable future. I do not think it is fair to blame Linus for this.
      --
      ato
    16. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, just use one of these =)

    17. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Mondongo · · Score: 1

      I downloaded 2.6.10 last week (the .tar.bz2 file) and compiled it on my Debian testing box. Then I try to run the latest nVidia drivers (6629, is it?) and it tells me that it cannot load nvidia.ko because of a problem with the kernel sources.

      So, I'm still booting 2.4.21, to load my beloved KDE!

    18. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Mondongo · · Score: 1

      Got the NVidia card for playin' on the Windows partition. You are right on that issue, but 'til I can get a new card, let's try to make this work, shall we?

    19. Re:someone tell nvidia! by cronius · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Which reminds me, when is Linus going to leave the 2.6x tree alone so we don't have to worry about so much broken shit all the time? Imagine if Windows changed it's kernel a couple times a year and broke the video drivers each time. People would bitch endlessly, but I guess as Linux users, we just have to put up with it.

      This is somewhat a Good Thing, and somewhat a Bad Thing. The latter is self explained, but the Good Thing about it is that the kernel developers are free to make not only good code, but great code.

      How many people bitch about Windows legacy crap? Do you think the developers over at MS wants to support all that old mess? Of course they don't, remember the win2k leak; in the code you could see all sorts of comments relating to hacks (that exact word) to prevent breaking legacy software.

      It creates a mess doing that, and one of the beautiful things about free software is that developers are free to persue the best solution to any given problem or task, even if it means rewriting mayor parts of the software (in this case the kernel). In Windows they can't do that, so they're stuck with the same mistakes they made many years ago. (Talk about solid code, eh?)

      In SP2 it looks like they finally gave up and decided they *had* to break something to close some huge security gaps (or whatever they were fixing). Free software (including the Linux kernel) doesn't have this disadvantage at all. Securityfixes seldomly break compatabilty, but new features sometimes do. In general, securityfixes are backported all the time, so you can safely use some old free software if a newer version breaks some compatability (given the old one is maintained ofcourse).

      But if you don't need the old compatability, the road to great code and great features are ahead. The choice is yours, choose whatever suits your needs. This is a Good Thing, and a good reason to use Free software.

      --
      Life is Reality
    20. Re:someone tell nvidia! by ilikejam · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, the 6629 drivers don't compile with 2.6.11. Damn those lazy ass nVidia engineers - .11's been out for hours.

      BTW, I'm not joking about the drivers not compiling.

      Dave

      --
      C-x C-s C-x k
    21. Re:someone tell nvidia! by ilikejam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not trade secrets that they're trying to protect - they're using licensed technology in the 3D accelerated drivers, so they can't open-source them. I think I read that in an interview with a nVidia engineer.

      --
      C-x C-s C-x k
    22. Re:someone tell nvidia! by fluxrad · · Score: 1

      It should work fine. I ran 2.6.10 for a day or two and it compiled fine ("sudo nvidia-installer -f" to force a recompile). maybe you should run another make on your kernel sources.

      --
      "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
    23. Re:someone tell nvidia! by ISayWeOnlyToBePolite · · Score: 1

      Try stock debian 2.6.10 from unstable, module-assistant and rdonalds repository. It's easy as cake (easier even).

    24. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Skater · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't compile for me. I didn't have time to figure out the problem, but neither they nor the old 55?? (don't remember the number off the top of my head, and I'm at work) drivers would compile.

    25. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The kernel part of the driver has about 250K of source code (about half of which is header files) and 3.5 megabytes of binary. None of the userspace code is open. How is that "mostly open source"?

    26. Re:someone tell nvidia! by lennarth · · Score: 1

      the parent is a great and informed comment and should be read by more posters.

    27. Re:someone tell nvidia! by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      I'm running Fedora Core 3 on x86_64 with kernel 2.6.10-1.766_FC3smp and the nVidia 6629 driver works, sort of.

      But repaint events are slow, there are horizontal rastering artifacts on occassion, and I get errors in dmesg like

      mtrr: type mismatch for f0000000,4000000 old:
      write-back new: write-combining
      NVRM: AGPGART: unable to set MTRR write-combining
      NVRM: not using NVAGP, AGPGART is loaded!!

      If 2.6.11 can help, I'll try it out.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    28. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      check
      http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=4 6676/

      will work for 2.6.11 final.
      nvidia *does* care

      good luck!
      rSl

    29. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Mondongo · · Score: 1

      I'll try it... Thank you very much!

    30. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Mondongo · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks for the advice... It's really neat to have the help of the Slashdot community.

    31. Re:someone tell nvidia! by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 1

      It doesn't happen with opensource drivers. Linus (and most of linux users) don't care about closed-source drivers. They don't give anything back, we don't give them anything.

    32. Re:someone tell nvidia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you actually upgrade? :P

    33. Re:someone tell nvidia! by cavetroll · · Score: 1

      both; that is what the 2.4 branch is for.

    34. Re:someone tell nvidia! by gnarlin · · Score: 1

      excuses, excuses!
      If they really wanted to make a free driver I'm quite certain they could pull it off by eighter relicensing, reimplementing or renegotiating.
      Bottom line, they are scared that the big bad ATI will steal their precioussssssshh special techniques (never seen before!).

      Thankfully there is a new graphics card in the works which will make it possible to use completly free drivers and also play relatively modern games. Please don't automatically respond by saying stuff like "but I can play my games fine on my radeon 9500, and those drivers are free". Yea, well ati didn't write those drivers did they.

      Neighter ATI or Nvidia have been very forthcoming with info on any new cards, so having a company make graphic card that is completly supported, along with having the development of it out in the open (as in scrutiny) is a huge step in the right direction.
      If enough of those are sold, chances are they will make more (and put more money into developing them).

      --
      A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver.
    35. Re:someone tell nvidia! by ilikejam · · Score: 1
      OK, but remember the 'nv' driver was written by nVidia, and open sourced (from the same article I can't find). They're quite happy to open source when they can, but I doubt very much that whoever they licensed the 3D acceleration tecnology from would be willing to have said technology opened up for all to see.

      Personally, I think it's fair enough that they're not opening their accelerated drivers - the GPU sector is utterly cut-throat, so it makes absolutely no sense for them to give anything away, lest ATI get 0.5FPS higher in Doom3 with stuff 'renegotiated' by nVidia from their licensors.

      When that open graphics project comes to fruition, it'll be a toss-up between expensive hardware and open drivers, or cheap hardware and closed drivers. In a fight between my (near empty) wallet and my software development preference, I'm afraid my wallet usually wins. Sometimes the closed source option is the best tool for the job. (Thankfully the situations where this is true are getting less and less).

      Dave

      --
      C-x C-s C-x k
    36. Re:someone tell nvidia! by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

      Did you even look at the nvnews.net site for patches? If you had you would have found: http://nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=46676 This is where you need to go for patches before the next formal release is out.

    37. Re:someone tell nvidia! by sloanster · · Score: 1
      Which reminds me, when is Linus going to leave the 2.6x tree alone so we don't have to worry about so much broken shit all the time? Imagine if Windows changed it's kernel a couple times a year and broke the video drivers each time. People would bitch endlessly, but I guess as Linux users, we just have to put up with it.

      Here's a gentle heads-up. Linux distros include a kernel, and it doesn't change by itself. Who told you to change it? It's purely your decision to go around trying every new kernel version that comes out. If you don't want your kernel to change, stop changing it, and don't try to pin the blame for it on anybody but yourself.

  11. Mirrors not caught up yet by philkerr · · Score: 3, Informative

    The UK mirror isn't showing 2.6.11 yet, perhaps it might be best to wait a little bit so they catch up instead of hitting kernel.org

  12. nVidia drivers don't quite work out of the box by Xpilot · · Score: 3, Informative

    However, Con Kolivas maintains a patchset for desktop users which incorporates a fix that allows the nVidia drivers to work at his kernel patch page. If you don't want the other stuff and just the nVidia fix, you can find the patch split out, and instructions on which patches to apply in his announcement of his patchset release. Check out the -ck patch though, it has a lot of cool stuff.

    (yay, I actually got a story submission in...hi mom!)

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:nVidia drivers don't quite work out of the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guys, don't everyone hammer Dr. Kolivas's website. The relevant announcement text is here:


      nvidia_6111-6629_compat2.diff
      Make nvidia compile support easier. Note to build the actual module you need
      to manually extract the NVIDIA_kernel file and patch (-p0) one of the
      relevant compatibility patches from here:
      http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.11/NV IDIA_ke rnel-1.0-6111-1132076.diff
      http://ck.kolivas.org/ patches/2.6/2.6.11/NVIDIA_ke rnel-1.0-6629-1201042.diff

      As for the patches, wait a while until you can actually get the kernel compiled first or someone set up a torrent. Spare the poor gentleman :)

    2. Re:nVidia drivers don't quite work out of the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprise! Modern hardware never works out of the box on linux. I know, I took my wireless NIC out and shot it yesterday, it was useless on linux. Note to self: next time, read the hardware compatibility list.

  13. ACPI suspend? by idlake · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does ACPI suspend work on more laptops? Inability to suspend is a major problem with Linux on laptops right now, as there are more and more ACPI-only laptops. The situation is considerably worse compared to APM, in my experience.

    1. Re:ACPI suspend? by lennarth · · Score: 4, Informative

      swsusp2 works like a charm on most modern 'tops.

    2. Re:ACPI suspend? by gabbarbhai · · Score: 2, Informative
      Does ACPI suspend work on more laptops?

      Don't know about 'more laptops' but yes, as long as you compile your own kernel and put all USB, wireless card, agpgart, and related stuff in kernel modules. Unload these modules before suspend and reload them after. Of course, that also means that your USB stuff needs to be unplugged before you suspend. Works like a charm on Debian Sid and Ubuntu "Whory". No swsusp2 necessary for me.
      --Thinkpad R40 on Ubuntu Hoary (or Debian Sid depending on the day of the week), with 2.6.10.

    3. Re:ACPI suspend? by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would I have to unplug USB devices if I want to just disable the software support?

    4. Re:ACPI suspend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It should. The problem with ACPI is that many laptops are not true ACPI but merely work as ACPI with the Windows drivers. That means the Linux drivers have to emulate all the bugs and misfeatures in the Windows drivers to fully support all laptops. That reverse engineering process which must be done whenever a new non-working laptop is found takes time.

    5. Re:ACPI suspend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Atleast ACPI suspend (to memory) on my nx7010 started working in 2.6.11-RC3 , so a wild guess is that yes, more laptops are able to suspend with 2.6.11 vs. previous 2.6 kernels.

      AC

    6. Re:ACPI suspend? by gsasha · · Score: 1

      I have always had the problem on R40, where it suspends OK, but refuses to wake up 'cause it doesn't recognize the LID button. There was a kernel patch that should take care of that, but I never succeeded to get through it. Did you experience this problem? And, is it gone in 2.6.11?

    7. Re:ACPI suspend? by jamesshuang · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you can get your laptop to suspend to ram, but waking up results in a dead screen, perhaps this program would help: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~mjg59/laptops/video-post _0.1.orig.tar.gz It does the video-post that most laptops don't do when coming back up, resulting in dead screen, but working CPU after an S3 suspend

    8. Re:ACPI suspend? by Zarhan · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU!

      This fixes one of the problems I've had with my Thinkpad 600E ACPI. (So far I could fix it by switching between X and console (Ctrl+alt+f1 && alt+f7), but this is easier).

    9. Re:ACPI suspend? by jamesshuang · · Score: 1

      You should just automate it with a small script in acpid- chvt 1 && chvt 7

    10. Re:ACPI suspend? by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      Based on http://www.ubuntu.com/wiki/HoaryPMResults, a decently large number of machines will do ACPI suspend to RAM now. You probably want vbetool to restore video state after resume.

    11. Re:ACPI suspend? by sublimespot · · Score: 1

      I have suspend and hibernate working on Debian "unstable". Lid support, and power button support.

      I compiled my own kernel 2.6.10 and I unload USB ehci and any network drivers in my suspend and hibernate scripts

    12. Re:ACPI suspend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you have module autoloading or hotplug running which will keep reloading the mods. Ones that need unloading are those that don't yet support suspend/resume properly.

    13. Re:ACPI suspend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In case you didn't understand: the OP is asking about S3 (suspend to ram) not S4 (software suspend).

    14. Re:ACPI suspend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm ... I think 2.6.10 had a regression (perhaps). In 2.6.9 my USB modules would reload on their own. I couldn't get this to work in 10, hoping it works again in 2.6.11.

    15. Re:ACPI suspend? by lennarth · · Score: 1

      then you'd need to disable that feature in the hotplug/autoloading software, too -- oder?

    16. Re:ACPI suspend? by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it can still be a bitch to get working. Is it ever going to be merged into the kernel?

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    17. Re:ACPI suspend? by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 2, Informative

      In its current form? No. It's far more likely that the interesting bits of technology will be integrated into swsusp - there's no chance whatsoever of stuff like the in-kernel user interface going in.

    18. Re:ACPI suspend? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      It's one thing to unload devices from memory, I can still run /etc/init.d/hotplug stop

      to prevent them from being reconnected. I'd have no need to physically disconnect the hardware before initiating a suspend/hibernate, right?

    19. Re:ACPI suspend? by lennarth · · Score: 1

      right.

    20. Re:ACPI suspend? by gabbarbhai · · Score: 1

      Try it with a USB keyboard :-)

  14. Re:Linux is a kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows is a general OS, and a 5 star pain in the ass.

  15. Lotsa good stuff by ThoreauHD · · Score: 2, Informative

    I like the serial and usb2 fixes. Looks like it's tested as a pretty stable revision. If anyone gets this installed before I do, post some impressions if you would.

  16. Not -so-natural high by necrodeep · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kernel junkies of the world unite! Your next fix has arrived!

    1. Re:Not -so-natural high by eobanb · · Score: 1

      Debian users: "Awesome, dude. Wait, what's this kernel 2.6 you speak of?"

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:Not -so-natural high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wget http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6. 11.tar.bz2 and apt-get install kernel-package are your friends.

      You may want to read zless /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/HOWTO-Linux-2.6-Wood y.gz
      if your're using Woody.

      HTH

  17. It wouldn't be the first time: by Mr+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    # urpmi --test magic
    The following packages contain magic:
    libmagic1
    libmagic1-devel
    libmagic1-stat ic-devel
    magicdev
    magicpoint
    mirrormagic
    php-i magick
    php-mime_magic

    1. Re:It wouldn't be the first time: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You should try Debian:

      $ apt-cache search magic | wc -l
      125
      $ apt-cache search magick | wc -l
      37

      And that's for the PPC version.

  18. Lies, Danm lies and Changelogs by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Funny

    So it's now _officially_ all bug-free.

    Torvalds, you scoundrel you!
    Next you'll be telling us the kernel was made by the toothfairy for a lower TCO than windows...
    Oh wait..

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Lies, Danm lies and Changelogs by Bros · · Score: 0

      Not to forget Santa Clause!

    2. Re:Lies, Danm lies and Changelogs by wootest · · Score: 1

      I always thought the last bug was defined as the bug fixed just before the last bug.

    3. Re:Lies, Danm lies and Changelogs by setagllib · · Score: 1

      http://linuxbugs.coverity.com/linuxbugs.htm
      And we all know the changelogs don't have fixes for all of those at once, so there are still many left in 2.6.11.

      Linux is buggier than you think. Factually (this is not trolling, shut the fuck up, the AC who keeps replying to me), NetBSD's bugs found with the same software: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2005/02/23/ 0037.html

      No mention of Free or Open or DFly, but they should be somewhere in between, from the bug reports I've seen around.

      --
      Sam ty sig.
  19. NVidia Driver patches for 6629 with 2.6.11 by spankers · · Score: 5, Informative

    zanders at nvForums has posted patches to improve performance with 2.6.x kernels. Here's the thread:
    http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=4 6676

    This is the cumulative patch:
    http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/attachment.php?att achmentid=10558

    1. Re:NVidia Driver patches for 6629 with 2.6.11 by peter_gzowski · · Score: 1

      Isn't the NVIDIA driver closed? How does one patch a closed-source driver? I admit, I have very limited knowledge of how the NVidia drivers actually work. I had been using them up until I installed Mandrake 10.2B3 the other day. The nv driver that Mdk10.2 installed works like a dream, though. I assume its 3D performance is sub-par, but I don't use my computer to play games anyway.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    2. Re:NVidia Driver patches for 6629 with 2.6.11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The driver itself (all the interesting stuff) is closed. There's a glue layer thats open to bind the kernel and the binary nvidia driver together, that HAS to be GPL licensed.... so they are all patching the glue layer, not the actual driver. //fatal

    3. Re:NVidia Driver patches for 6629 with 2.6.11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kernel module that the driver uses to talk to the kernel/hardware is open.

    4. Re:NVidia Driver patches for 6629 with 2.6.11 by Henk+Poley · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, the ebuild in Gentoo portage already patches the driver with all of these.

      Now go mod me -2 Flamebait for mentioning Gentoo.

  20. A kernel patch for supercomputers ? by Gopal.V · · Score: 5, Funny
    TFA mentions that

    >InfiniBand, which is derived from its underlying concept of "infinite bandwidth," is a switched fabric interconnect technology for high-performance network devices that is common in a number of supercomputer clusters.

    So that works only for supercomputer clusters ?.

    Interestingly, the ChangeLog has some very small number of entries. The one I found most fun was:-

    Randy Dunlap:
    o [ide] make 1-bit fields unsigned
    I mean, other wise they would end up as "-1" or "0" (when you assume in code that "0" or "1" for 1 -bit fields). How did a sign-extension in the IDE (must be heavily used) be missed till version 2.6 ??. Typically, this looks like the average release - some bug fixes and a couple of big features which nobody (well almost nobody) would use on their boxes.
    1. Re:A kernel patch for supercomputers ? by rokzy · · Score: 1

      re:signs

      it'd be fine if they've been using "eq 0" and "ne 0" as tests.

    2. Re:A kernel patch for supercomputers ? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I remember working with a guy who always added an extra bit to his bitfields 'because they always came out negative'. Somewhere in his (lack of) formal education someone forgot to tell him about unsigned ints...

      When I joined he'd been working with the company for 2 years and was their senior developer. You can imagine what a state the code was in... I basically deleted the lot and rewrote it (which pissed him off no end but pleased all the other developers).

    3. Re:A kernel patch for supercomputers ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wheres the changelog hiding?
      you can't make a kernel without a changelog! thats like microsoft making a service pack with improvments.

    4. Re:A kernel patch for supercomputers ? by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      Note that the changelog in TFA is just from 2.6.11 RC5 to 2.6.11, not from 2.6.10 to 2.6.11.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    5. Re:A kernel patch for supercomputers ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > o [ide] make 1-bit fields unsigned

      Maybe it was ones complement signed.

    6. Re:A kernel patch for supercomputers ? by iabervon · · Score: 2, Informative

      It only works for supercomputer clusters only in that, if you connect your computers with infiniband stuff, you might as well start calling them a supercomputer cluster.

      Assuming you use the 1-bit fields with "if (field)" or "if (!field)", it doesn't matter if they're signed, except that you'll get a warning (but the desired effect) for "field = 1". Problems come up when you use the value as a larger type, but that's not a good idea for code clarity reasons anyway, when the field semantically stores either a true value or a false value (in the sense that "if" uses). This change is really for getting rid of warnings (and improving maintainability) not fixing bugs.

    7. Re:A kernel patch for supercomputers ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:A kernel patch for supercomputers ? by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 1

      When the news appeared on /. the changelog was still not there. But now it is.
      Anyway, a good way to see what new things are supported is running make oldconfig after you copy your linux-2.6.10/.config to the new dir.

  21. SCSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe now my DVD writer will work without me performing voodoo...

    Then again... maybe not

    1. Re:SCSI by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Dear sir ,
      you seem to have confused Voodoo , with buying supported hardware and installing kernel moduels
      Yours sincerly
      The president of Cbua

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  22. Actually got a story submission in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great! Now just resubmit it a few times and whoever is asleep at the wheel today will gladly post it again...and again...and again.

  23. Inspiration from Red Dwarf: by T-Kir · · Score: 2, Funny

    Infiniband welcomes careful drivers.

    :-D

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    1. Re:Inspiration from Red Dwarf: by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Infinite Improbability Driver coming Real Soon Now...

  24. Re:Yay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey parent is not a troll , he is just a bumpkin.

  25. An Introduction to the InfiniBand Architecture by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 1

    ...for everyone who didn't know what it is as well:

    http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2002/02/ 04 /windows.html

  26. Help? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    I'm new to Linux (only just tried Ubuntu and had a bad exprience)... can anyone explain what use the kernel is to the average user? I thought it was just used for a base of distros... It doesn't make sense to be able to upgrade an OS mid... use..?

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Help? by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      You're right, it is no use to the average user in most circumstances. Just wait for your distro to issue an update and use their kernel. It will have been tested, and will have distro-specific patches applied.

      Sometimes, however, you might want a fix that your distro vendor is not offering, and you might want to compile the kernel yourself. Some of the weenies here like to see code compiling (regardless if they can actually write code) and they enjoy things like installing gentoo and compiling kernels, but for most of us it's a pain in the ass.

    2. Re:Help? by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

      can anyone explain what use the kernel is to the average user?

      It improves your gas mileage.

      http://www.channel955.com/mojo_phonescam_clueles sa utorepair.html

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  27. Reiser4 by thundercatslair · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know when reiser4 will be included? I use it on pretty much all my partitions and to use it I have to use extremely experimental kernel patches.

    1. Re:Reiser4 by Lussarn · · Score: 1

      extremely experimental kernel patches.

      You pretty much answered your own question. I don't think anybody want extremely experimental kernel patches in the main kernel.

    2. Re:Reiser4 by timster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Since reiser4 is in beta, I doubt it will be in the mainstream kernel particularly soon. It's going to be tough to use experimental filesystems without using experimental patches. I don't think anyone sane is storing important data on reiser4 partitions without doing extensive backups.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    3. Re:Reiser4 by Dimble+ThriceFoon · · Score: 0, Redundant

      i'd like an answer to this Q too............

    4. Re:Reiser4 by thundercatslair · · Score: 0

      The only way I can really get reiser4 is with mm-sources which ati-drivers will not compile if using them and I get a lot of lockups. Or I can use the CKO patch set which I currently am using, but I don't want a lot of the patches that are included. Also reiser4 has been out of beta for a while and I have been using it since then and I have never had any problems at all.

    5. Re:Reiser4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am using it for my / filesystem for a year so far without any problems.

    6. Re:Reiser4 by McDutchie · · Score: 1
      I am using it for my / filesystem for a year so far without any problems.

      You forgot the "NO CARRIER". :)

    7. Re:Reiser4 by InterStellaArtois · · Score: 1
      -- For all we know, the Universe is a computer simulation, and the programmers have no idea we exist.

      Nick Bostrom thinks so:

      Are you living in a computer simulation?

    8. Re:Reiser4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reiser4 is NOT in beta - it was released months ago. It was throughly tested as well - there really is no excuse for it not to be included in the kernel now. XFS has been included in the stable kernel for some time and they are still fixing tons of bugs in it - look at the changelogs for 2.6! Mark it as experimental (like the tons of other things in Linux) if you like, but at the VERY LEAST it deserves to be included very soon.

    9. Re:Reiser4 by timster · · Score: 1

      You are right by the way, in the sense that Namesys no longer considers it to be beta. I was not aware that the project had been officially released. I should have checked the site.

      Since it is a completely different filesystem than Reiser3, I'm not surprised if there is a bit of a waiting period before it's integrated into the mainline kernel. As I recall XFS had a waiting period too, though I don't know how long it was.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  28. Officially bug-free by next_permutation · · Score: 1


    Finally! Looks like there are a lot of bug fixes in this one.

    I hope the big memory leak I've been seeing with 2.6.10 have been fixed in 2.6.11. I had to disable HIGHMEM just to keep the machine running more than a few days, and that unfortunately means it's limited to 896MB LOWMEM.

    1. Re:Officially bug-free by zarr · · Score: 1
      896MB LOWMEM.

      I thought anything above 640k was highmem... And what is this "multitasking" thing everyone is talking about? *grumble grumble*uphill both ways*grumble grumble*and we liked it!*grumble...

  29. unregister_netdevice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this release will finally fix the unregister_netdevice problem that can easily kill most systems ...

  30. linux is not a kernel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trolling? Is slashdot trying to tell me that linux is not a kernel? wtf?

  31. Score thus far by kmartshopper · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linux 2.6.11 SCO 0 Better luck next time

  32. Re:Help? Wikipedia to the rescue! by UnderScan · · Score: 4, Informative

    From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_system:
    In general, the operating system is the first layer of software loaded into computer memory when it starts up. As the first software layer, all other software that gets loaded after it depends on this software to provide them with various common core services. These common core services include, but are not limited to: disk access, memory management, task scheduling, and user interfacing. Since these basic common services are assumed to be provided by the OS, there is no need to re-implement those same functions over and over again in every other piece of software that you may use. The portion of code that performs these core services is called the "kernel" of the operating system. Operating system kernels had been evolved from libraries that provided the core services into unending programs that control system resources because of the early needs of accounting for computer usage and then protecting those records.
    So that is the OS and the kernel. A new kernel version is new drivers and updated system services, which is a good thing. This is not the same as upgrading Win2000 to winXP or changing Linux distros as those involve many many more programs, libraries, & systems as compared (what is collectively known as an Operating System) to a kernel.

  33. Info for the masses by brsmith4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of you that are unaware, since the poster doesn't explain at all what Infiniband is, I will explain it for you.

    Infiniband is a high-speed, low-latency interconnect used heavily with beowulf clusters (currently). Infiniband, like Myrinet, addressed many of the problems that are inherent with using interconnects like ethernet.

    The biggest problem with any TCP/IP based transport, in the world of supercomputing, is latency. The amount of error checking that is involved creates latencies that bring fine-grained (lots of memory reads/writes/swaps) calculations to their knees. As many clusters use MPI (Message Passing Interface) for sharing memory between nodes, a low-latency interconnect was needed to replace ethernet and TCP/IP. People have worked on reducing latencies over ethernet by designing raw transport stacks, relying on the switch and the quality/brevity of the ethernet connections (using short, shielded cables proved useful), to ensure accurate data transport, but none of these methods have proven viable.

    Infiniband has also been used as an interconnect for network storage devices as there are obvious advantages to this; eliminating much of that latency makes reads and writes to a device much simpler thus reducing overhead and improving overall throughput.

    More information on Infiniband can be found here at the Infiniband sourceforge page. This should give a sufficiently technical overview of what it does without any of the marketing talk.

    1. Re:Info for the masses by sconeu · · Score: 1


      It's been a couple of years since I looked at IB, but I thougt it used IPv6 addressing (or some close variant thereof).

      Side note: when I worked at a Fibre Channel startup, some of our guys left to go work over at TopSpin.

      Tracy, Meher, if you're reading this -- Hi!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Info for the masses by Krellan · · Score: 1

      InfiniBand uses something called a "GID" for a hardware address, similar to a MAC address.

      http://www.iw.com/magazine.php?inc=060101/06.01.01 internettech2.html

      It is 128-bit. It might be IPv6-compatible on an isolated network, but I don't believe it adheres to the IPv6 global hierarchy.

      InfiniBand cards are commonly multiport. In addition to the card having a unique 64-bit ID, each *port* on the card has its own 64-bit ID! These addresses are combined to form the 128-bit GID. (This is supposedly to help with such things as bonding, failover, and so on.)

    3. Re:Info for the masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted to complain that the second sentence of your sig is redundant, but then I realized that maybe the people it applies to might not understand without it. Now I just want to cry.

  34. Re:Yay. by saladami · · Score: 0

    pfft, you can just apt-get java if you google a little for it. Or just use the ubuntu sources. As for the browser.. don't close it, why would you close it, put it on another workspace. You sound like you need an RPM based distro. /installed linux last week

  35. psmouse.c by MrNemesis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Does anyone know if any work is being done on the rather irritating problem I (and a fair few others) get with the 2.6 input system? Every time I use a mouse that goes through a KVM switch or a USB->PS2 adapter, the mouse would spazz around crazily and syslog would fill up with:

    lost synchronisation, throwing [1|2|3] bytes away

    Adding psmouse.proto=imps made the problem go away for most usage, but it still occurs under very heavy load, which makes mplaying UT impossible :(

    --
    Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    1. Re:psmouse.c by philci52 · · Score: 1

      Is this a "known" issue. After all the developers can't fix something they don't know about. I'd imagine using a KVM switch is not all that common and developers may not even have access to one. If you want your bug fixed, visit the LKML or if you have the money, suggest that you will purchase a KVM switch for the developer in question to use.

    2. Re:psmouse.c by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 1

      I use a 2.6 kernel on my various Fedora Core 3 systems through two different KVM's and don't get this sort of behaviour. Perhaps it is your particular type of KVM that is causing the probmelemette. In fact, there is nothing out of the ordinary with any of my systems that run through these KVM's. They are not branded types but just cheapo ones. Thats just my 0.2tenge worth

      --
      I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
    3. Re:psmouse.c by MrNemesis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Aye, I've been perusing the LKML archives for a few days (since the system has only been up and running for a coupla weeks, and the first week was windows configuration) and I'm slowly compiling data about it and trying a few random patches - it's very much a known issue and goes all the way back to 2.5. If I can't fix it within a week I may well stump up the moolah (and I've got more USB->PS/2 adapters than you can shake a stick at), although getting it to someone outside the UK will be tricky.

      All in all it's still a very small blemish on what is otherwise the most crap-reistant system I've ever used :) I could probably solve it all by doing away with the adapters, but it makes dual booting a pain (esp. as I find USB very unresponsive in windows under heavy load).

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    4. Re:psmouse.c by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      Well, as the LKML will show it's an odd problem that comes and goes for alot of users under generally different conditions (many aren't using KVM's and such at all). The full changelog http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/Change Log-2.6.11 shows a number of fixes made to the input system, so I'm keeping my fingers crossed. I'll try vanilla out tonight and see if that helps any...

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    5. Re:psmouse.c by MrNemesis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bah, hit return to early. Meant to post this chunk as well:

      Input: psmouse - reset mouse before doing intellimouse/explorer probes in case it got confused by earlier probes; switch to streaming code before setting scale and resolution, otherwise some KVMs get confused.

      There are a whole load of other relevant-sounding fixes in the input system listed as well; damnit, if only I'd found the full changelog earlier!

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    6. Re:psmouse.c by philci52 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm glad to see that you are pursuing the bug using the proper methods. Good luck.

  36. Time to... by Cyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... update your SCO licenses! /rimshot

    --
    cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
  37. finally found a way... by lone_knight · · Score: 1

    to get infinite pr0n? God, I love Linux!

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give answers. --Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:finally found a way... by zev1983 · · Score: 1

      'finally found a way... to get infinite pr0n? God, I love Linux!'

      I think you would be looking for a storage solution...

  38. what it is by r00t · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Infiniband is a "smart" fabric; it supports reliable data transmission. Note that, as with modem protocols, this causes ugly interactions with TCP retransmits. TCP is really designed to work over an Ethernet-like network, where congestion causes packet loss and not much else bad ever happens.

    You can use Infiniband as a LAN, for storage, or maybe for within a box. You could say that Infiniband starts where Hypertransport leaves off.

    For the short-haul usage, Infiniband is kind of big in terms of chip real estate. You can't cram it into a corner of a little FPGA like you can with RapidIO. For the long-haul usage, 1 gig or 10 gig Ethernet might be a better choice.

    Note that Intel, originally the primary sponsor behind Infiniband, no longer gives a damn. But hey, if you have money to burn...

  39. New to Linux? by xtermin8 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Generally the updated kernel is not useful to the average user, especially not for desktop users. The major updates that interested me were: the first bootable installation CDs, then the live filesystem CDs. If you have access the a high speed connection, try downloading "Live linux filesystem" distributions. These are great for learning and experimenting with. Good Luck!

    1. Re:New to Linux? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'm on dial up but I've got the Ubuntu CDs here and spenta coupleof hours on Linux. It's a shame my modem isn't supported or I'd use Linux full time.. I'm just trying to find out if Dawn of war runs well in Wine right now then going to sort out broadband and get things moving.

      --
      I like muppets.
    2. Re:New to Linux? by gnuman99 · · Score: 1
      "winmodem" or "controlless" modem are all crap (not really a modem). What is needed is a *hardware* modem. ALL hardware modems are supported by linux because they are just serial devices. Serial devices are the /dev/ttyS* devices.

      /dev/ttyS0 -> COM1
      /dev/ttyS1 -> COM 2
      /dev/ttyS2 -> COM 3
      /dev/ttyS3 -> COM 4

      etc..

      non-hardware modems are about $20. Hardware modems are about $50+ or so.

      For broadband, if the modem connects to your box with an ethernet cable, then it is probably supported as it either uses PPPoE or DHCP.

  40. Show of hands... by Cyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who had been running 2.6.9 or earlier and just finished making a 2.6.10 kernel for the first time (e.g. because they suddenly needed new hardware support).

    *rhand* *grouse*

    --
    cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    1. Re:Show of hands... by cswiii · · Score: 1

      Even worse, I've been scratching my head, trying to get 2.6.10 to work.

      Until recently, I was running, compiling 2.4.x kernels with no problem; I then moved to FC3, and for the first time, was using 2.6.x kernels, and first time using grub.

      2.6.10 builds for me, and everything. I build the kernels, build and install the modules, and since I have SCSI, I run initrd; I add the kernel and initrd.img line to my grub.conf. However, I still get a kernel panic telling me that it can't find the system at boot...? I have checked and triple-checked my grub.conf -- it's pointing to the right files. Regardless, doesn't work, even when I rebuild with SCSI builtin, as opposed to a module. Doesn't make any sense at all.

      Regardless, I'm compiling 2.6.11 as I type this... :P.

    2. Re:Show of hands... by Nighttime · · Score: 1

      /me raises hand.

      Downloaded linux-2.6.10 to see if a vanilla kernel would fix the problem I'm having with a video capture card rather than a vendor-supplied one. It took 3 hours to compile on a Celeron 400 w/ 384MB and ATA66 HD. Mind, that was with all the options switched on. Don't know yet if it has fixed the problem, did a remote reboot and it didn't come back up.

      --
      I've got a fever and the only prescription is more COBOL.
    3. Re:Show of hands... by SLot · · Score: 1

      I just recently went through similar. Is it complaining about pivot_root failing?

      If so, log in via rescue mode create a initrd directory in / . If not, well, dunno then.

    4. Re:Show of hands... by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      However, I still get a kernel panic telling me that it can't find the system at boot...?

      I've _just_ been through this dance and what worked (don't ask me why) was this entry in grub.conf:

      title Fedora Core (custom)
      root (hd0,1)
      kernel /boot/vmlinuz ro root=/dev/hda2
      initrd /boot/initrd.img

      Normal entry looks like this:

      kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.10-1.9_FC2 ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb quiet

      Pointing LABEL to the right place by hand seemed to work. vmlinuz and initrd.img are symlinks to the correct files...

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    5. Re:Show of hands... by canadiangoose · · Score: 1

      I went from 2.6.6 to 2.6.11-rc2 to get my new Audigy Value working. I've been going from rc-to-rc, and so far I've been very happy with 2.6.11. My only real problems have been with my GeForce drivers, but the problems have been fairly minor, and I'm sure nVidia will catch up soon. I'm not very pleased with the new kernel development model, but 2.6.11 seems to be a very solid release. I'll likely be running it until my next hardware upgrade.

      --
      Never eat more than you can lift -- Miss Piggy
    6. Re:Show of hands... by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      for some reason, red hat's label patch has not been included in the mainstream kernel.

      IF you know which partition is your root, instead of having grub say

      root=/dev/sda1

      instead of

      root=LABEL=/root

      The use of initrd and LABEL= makes upgrading RH systems to mainline kernels more of a pain than it should be.

    7. Re:Show of hands... by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      what a cock-up

      Do the first root instead of the second.

      I get this wrong EVERY SINGLE FUCKING TIME I upgrade. It's set in one of the many install-kernel scripts that are scattered seemingly randomly around the system.

      How do other distros do it?

    8. Re:Show of hands... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I just built a 2.6.10 kernel because I was moving my drives to a new (actually older but still dual-P3) system. Worked on the first try, yay. Of course copying the old /proc/config.gz is cheating a little... anyway I've been waiting for 2.6.11 for a little while now because I've decided to go ahead and dedicate most of my primary desktop system to Linux, with a Windows partition for gaming. VLC was the thing that finally convinced me :) I have an ITE8212 RAID controller in my system, which also (unfortunately) has an nVidia nForce2 chipset, and the driver supposedly entered the kernel in 2.6.11. Time to go find out.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  41. ck, cko patchsets by Noksagt · · Score: 1

    ck is a nice patchset. For something with slightly more, CKO offers everything ck does with Reiser4, Supermount, Alan Cox's -ac patchset, software suspend, updates to libata/ALSA/Bttv, and more.

    If anyone knows how to donate small amounts of money to the developers, please let me know: both ck and cko are on my list of projects to eventually donate to (linked to from my URL).

  42. Re:Help? Wikipedia to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice to see someone give a good answer about Linux instead of screaming "lU$3R, l0$3R!!!".
    Thanks

  43. ChangeLog by Sunspire · · Score: 2, Informative

    The linked changelog is only the changes between 2.6.11-RC5 and the final version, that's why it's so short. Is there a complete changelog available somewhere?

    Also, does anyone know what the status of inotify support is? I think a lot of people would be glad to see it merged, as apps like Beagle require it and the new Gamin daemon (a FAM replacement) should work much better with it.

    --
    It's like deja vu all over again.
    1. Re:ChangeLog by Scrapheap_Challenge · · Score: 2, Informative

      Changelog 2.6.11 (Summary of changes from v2.6.10 to v2.6.11)
      Or go to kernel.org and click on Changelog next to 2.6.11 :)

    2. Re:ChangeLog by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      eeeek! Here I am feeling so good about how stable my machines are running with a particular kernel, and someone has to mention a changelog with issues that fill my mind with doubt!

  44. Ummm by Ponfyr · · Score: 1

    Step... Drag... Stumble... Drool.

  45. Gentoo users unite by kernel_dan · · Score: 0

    It's already in (Gentoo) Portage

    emerge sync && emerge development-sources

    --

    Illegal? Samir, This is America.
    1. Re:Gentoo users unite by kernel_dan · · Score: 1

      Ah, forgot to tell y'all its in the unstable branch.

      echo sys-kernel/development-sources ~x86 >> /etc/portage/package.keywords emerge development-sources

      --

      Illegal? Samir, This is America.
    2. Re:Gentoo users unite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And by the time you finish compiling Debian Sarge will have it too. ;-)

    3. Re:Gentoo users unite by tPassive · · Score: 1

      Yes, but with AMD64, you will need more time to download than to compile. And in Soviet Russia...

      --
      ... I don't like it, but I guess things happen that way. (J. Cash)
  46. Still no PATA Support? by bnavarro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There doesn't appear to be a full changelog yet, but I have been following the release candidates, and it appears that Parallel ATA (AKA "Ultra ATA") Hard disk support is still not in the kernel.

    This is frustrating. I had purchased an Ultra ATA Hard disk drive (which came bundled with a Serial/Parallel ATA controller), and I had it working fine under SUSE Linux 9.0. What I didn't realize at the time was, Promise made proprietary drivers for SuSE Linux, and no other distro.

    I have wanted to switch over to Fedora Linux for some time now, but although it is able to detect my SATA card and load drivers for it just fine, It does not recognise the PATA connector, and does not locate my hard drive, as a result.

    There does appear to be a patch available for this, but it is still officially "in development", and I am concerned that it will not make it into the mainstream kernel in time now for Fedora Core 4 to be able to recognize my hard drive, and install to it.

    This is so frustrating. What is the holdup? PATA support appears to have been discussed for almost a year now and it is still not in the kernel. There appear to be a lot of Ultra ATA hard disks on the market; I can't be the only one encountering the frustration of not being able to install a modern version of Linux due to lack of driver support.

    1. Re:Still no PATA Support? by Brane2 · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about ?

      Some 70% machines in use today have good old PATA discs. How do you think that Linux works on them ?

      Besides, all of my external PATA cards are from Promise and I can assure you that they work with vanilla kernel 2.6. There IS module for Promise cards and it CAN be compiled in kernel !

    2. Re:Still no PATA Support? by Unit3 · · Score: 1

      It's very unclear what your problem is here. Exactly what PATA hardware are you having problems with? I've been using PATA connected to SATA just fine since about 2.6.4, so your problem description seems very strange.

      --
      -- sudo.ca
    3. Re:Still no PATA Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is so frustrating. What is the holdup?

      How about people that just bitch about the state of free software and don't help out with it?

      You don't have to be a l33t programmer, you could write documentation.

    4. Re:Still no PATA Support? by bnavarro · · Score: 1

      There appears to be some confusion, so I'll followup here and clarify what I mean

      So, apparantly, PATA is more of a "generic" term for IDE hard drives than I had realized :) When I say "no PATA support", I mean, "No support for Parallel ATA connectors on Serial ATA Adapter cards". This is essential for Ultra ATA hard drives -- you cannot connect an Ultra ATA hard drive to a legacy IDE connector, it must be a special PATA connector that uses some of the same logic for Serial ATA drives.

      Yes, there is a Promise Serial ATA adapter driver, but no, it does not have support for the onboard PATA connector yet. Support for it is still extremely bleeding edge, you must patch it in manually yourself (in addition to being able to understand how to comnpile a vanilla kernel), and why should I trust that driver code that is still "in development" will not potentially corrupt my hard drive?

      This also doesn't solve my dilemma of having no support for my hard drive at install time -- the SATA driver that Fedora (and all 2.6 kernel based distros) have burned into the ISO CD/DVD image will not recognize my hard drive, so I can't even install Linux. It's a chicken-and-egg dilemma for me; In order to patch the kernel to support my hard drive, I have to be able to first install Linux on the hard drive! (and no, I'm not running SuSE 9.0 anymore, so I can't use that to recompile)

    5. Re:Still no PATA Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Knoppix not support it?

    6. Re:Still no PATA Support? by bnavarro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is for Promise Serial ATA controllers (PCI card, not built into the motherboard). Specifically, the Promise FasTrak TX2Plus (rebranded as a Maxtor SATA/150)

      You got it to work? With which vendor's card?? At this point, I am so frustrated, I'm willing to throw money at the solution and buy a new Serial/Parallel ATA controller, if it is affordable enough ($20-30). My understanding, however, was that libata itself (not just the individual drivers, like sata_promise) had no support yet for the PATA connector on any SATA adapter.

    7. Re:Still no PATA Support? by Astatine · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. An "Ultra ATA" hard drive will connect to and work on any remotely recent IDE connector -- this *is* "PATA". The bridged PATA connectors on some motherboards and SATA cards that use chipsets like the Si3112 are, functionally, exactly the same as the native PATA connectors on motherboards, PATA cards, etc! The only difference is the way in which they are implemented in hardware, and the driver support (or lack thereof, typically, for those bridged PATA interfaces).

      You're *better* off connecting a modern "Ultra ATA" hard drive with PATA interface to a native PATA connector (what you call a "legacy IDE connector") than to a PATA connector bridged through SATA, because (a) you won't have the overhead introduced by the bridging, which may decrease performance a little, and (b) the driver support is almost certainly better.

    8. Re:Still no PATA Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      DUDE, Ultra ATA has been around.... let's see for about 6+ years now, so to say "it has to use the SATA logic" is a bit of a naivete. You can plug that drive into any ATA connector and it will work all UATA does is give you higher transfer rates (most mobos I've seen support ATA133 at least!) but even if your mobo doesn't support the highest ATA transfer rates it will use the highest speed it can then you can get linux to recognize the PATA chipset on board. But unless you have a REALLY old motherboard you'll get ATA66 out of your MOBO ATA connector.

    9. Re:Still no PATA Support? by ISayWeOnlyToBePolite · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Still no PATA Support? by Astatine · · Score: 2, Informative

      See my other post. You don't need a PATA-bridged-through-SATA connector. Honestly. And with the current driver situation they're about the worst things to try to use. Connect the drive to one of the native PATA ports on your motherboard, or if you don't have any spare, pick up a native PATA interface card, e.g. a Promise TX2 Ultra ATA133 (with PDC2027x series chipset).

    11. Re:Still no PATA Support? by Quinn · · Score: 1

      Except that he wants to use the PATA connectors on his Promise card, which indeed are not supported by the kernel's Promise SATA card driver.

      I'd also like to do that, because hey-- why waste the extra connectors if I've got the drives? (Except that my PSU is probably maxed out...)

      My Promise card doesn't support optical drives for some reason (a hardware restriction noted in the manual), which is a bit of a disappointment.

      Anyway, I bought it for SATA and it works swell for that.

      --
      #19845
    12. Re:Still no PATA Support? by aug24 · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's what I need next too... I currently have exactly one non-Linux (XP) box for the sole reason that I assumed "well it must be in there by now" when last buying hardware and it isn't. Damn.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    13. Re:Still no PATA Support? by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      Gee whiz, if you actually read the page you linked to, you'd see that the patch won't be ready until March due to the standard not yet being finalized. In any case, I fail to see what this has to do with PATA drives.

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    14. Re:Still no PATA Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd also like to do that, because hey-- why waste the extra connectors if I've got the drives?

      Because you will saturate the PCI bus and slaughter performance?

      I do like the way the original poster mentioned that there was a patch available but he didn't want to use it in case it caused FS corruption.

      If you're worried about corruption why the hell did you buy a Promise card?

    15. Re:Still no PATA Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or I could just switch to a proprietary OS that ALREADY WORKS! In the end it'll "cost" me a HELL of a lot less than having to write ever fscking missing feature of Linux myself!

    16. Re:Still no PATA Support? by enosys · · Score: 1

      You could ask someone else to compile a patched kernel for you, or you could install Linux inside VMWare or something similar and then patch and compile the kernel inside that. All of these products can be evaluated for free. If you have a CD drive that Linux can access you could maybe even just boot a LiveCD like KNOPPIX and compile a new kernel using it.

    17. Re:Still no PATA Support? by Bob+The+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I'm just dense... but I'm typing this on a computer with an Ultra ATA hard drive (and one of those Promise cards) in Slackware 10.1... and I'm pretty sure I've had this drive since Slack 9. Slack uses a vanilla kernel, so I've got to ask... have you *tried* it yet?

      It didn't take any extra work for me... its just listed as /dev/hde instead of hda, otherwise it uses and detects all 200 gigs of it.

      HTH,
      Bill

    18. Re:Still no PATA Support? by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

      Actually.. I have a Dell M70, and I can assure you that using a SATA/PATA controller with a PATA CDROM and a PATA disk, that the disk works, but is SLOW and the CDROM doesn't work at all.. requires the use of ide-generic which eliminates the ability to do DMA. A LOT more work is needed on this stuff. A LOT. I'm glad it works in your config, but I'd say it's 50/50 at best and if one day you find your data to not be coherent.. you may just feel that more work is needed on this as well.

    19. Re:Still no PATA Support? by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

      Chipsets like the ICH6M supply an Intel SATA controller that is used to manage both SATA and PATA devices. However the SATA support in 2.6.11 only recognizes disks, not CDROMs. This forces you to use the ide_generic driver to gain visibility to your CD/DVD, BUT with that you will NOT have DMA (which makes having a CD/DVD rather painful). Also, I noticed that the throughput using a PATA device through a combo SATA/PATA controller is not good under Linux. It has a lot to do with PATA since not all systems (especially laptops) have independent IDE/ATA vs. SATA controllers. A lot of the new Sonoma based laptops will have a shared SATA/PATA controller. I can assure you it is not working well right now under Linux.

    20. Re:Still no PATA Support? by CyberDave · · Score: 1

      Fixed link: http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html#tx2.

      That status page is a few months old. Anyone know if what the mentioned there (that the PATA patch in libata-dev) has made it into the mainline kernel?

  47. It sure is! by zogger · · Score: 1

    It's a valid concern and I hope it gets fixed somehow. This subthread needs a plus 5. That's like one of the things I clicked on this article for, to see what if anything important to the average linux user actually got fixed in the new kernel, or what the new features are. Cd burning is a valid issue. Instead, 7/8th useless banter.

    I want slashcode to have keyword filtering, you could take a quick glance, choose the top 3-4 keywords the (what is to anyone "you", your choice) drivel subthreads are in, the stuff you really have no use for, then reload the thread and actually follow a tech discussion. We don't use a numerical karma system in meatspace for conversations, it's all based on keywords, people can tune out walk away from stuff they aren't interested in, here, you either let someoone else decide for you with karma, or have to spend a long time reading when you might only really want to read a few selected replies in the whole string. Keyword filter, stuff you want, and stuff you don't want would *fix* this.

    The karma number system is beyond broken at this point, it doesn't work, even with metamoderation. It's a nice theory, but it just *does not* work.

    Here is another alternative. Each article has an option, one or the other or both. You can read a page (with keyword filtering),AND/ OR, each article automatically spawns a chat channel with some IM or IRC channel, and the chit chatters can go over there in real time and do their chit chatting and "petrified grits in russia you ignorant jerkoff" drivel. Save the web pages for actual meat, use the chat channels for the little cutsey pie jokes and mini flame wars and whatnot. It has to be a channel for each article posted, not a generic "slashdot" channel. Channels stay up for 24 hours, then get automatically ended. Anyone who wants to then can log their own, some people like the chit chat banter, others don't. I am forced to rely on a karma system that is hideously broken and will not get fixed because it is a design flaw in general terms, or spend 10 times longer reading than is necessary at 0 or -1 even just to actually find anything important.

    1. Re:It sure is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying the Slashdot Moderation System is obsolete? We'll have to ask Bill Gates about that, he's the expert on obsoletion.

    2. Re:It sure is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am forced to rely on a karma system that is hideously broken...

      No. I think you will find that you are completely at liberty to fuck off somewhere else.

      Maybe you should get one of these new "blog" things. Basically they allow you to whine as much as you want while everyone else can ignore you with minimum effort.

  48. Re:infiniband:more connections, more bandwidth by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    It means that physical hardware limitations are the ONLY limitations. I think the "underlying concept" is that it should scale up as more connections are added. Other standards had inherent limitations so that adding more or better quality connections would help up to a certain point. Infiniband is not only for linux.

  49. Important release info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those of us who don't have the time to wade through the changelog to identify all the important release information for this release ... Does anyone have a non-kernel expert of what changes/updates/features/*important* fixes this release brings us?

  50. thinkpad? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    anyone know if the X series of thinkpad IBM laptops will suspend properly now? mine doesn't return from sleep, and won't even begin to suspend to disk properly. (thinkpad x30)

    then again, X goofs up for me with the bios 'hybernation' feature too. though I think that's independent, as it still "works" - just with screen garbage on resume.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:thinkpad? by salimma · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine has a Thinkpad X30, and he could suspend to RAM just fine - he did run a non-standard kernel though AFAIR.

      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    2. Re:thinkpad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My x30 hibernates just fine with the 2.6.x kernels. (I don't use acpi, though.) That said, the sysclock was getting screwed up after coming out of hibernation with 2.6.10. It was fine before that and the problem seems to have been fixed with the new kernel.

  51. Re:Linux is dying. by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    ...
    Wow. What operating system have you been hiding under?

    --
    Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
  52. great by bigredmed · · Score: 1
    It would be if Linux developers would ever provide REAL support for things like Palm pilots, ipods, usb plug and play devices, and other esoteric things that fringe groups (like the 99% of us that use computers) use every day.

    I am sick and tired of the next Kernel announcement talking about its support for some esoteric system or system that most of us don't use. If the linux distros want to be on desktops, the support for commonly used devices has got to improve by a LARGE amount.

    1. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be great if people would be more open minded. You do realize that the most time and money invested in the kernel is primarily for business related purposes: i.e. servers.

      The ratio of desktops to servers is not that big. And if you would do your research there is a great deal of support from other developers who provide patches for almost everything you mentioned.

      Quit whining and do some work on your part.

    2. Re:great by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Informative

      "I am sick and tired of the next Kernel announcement talking about its support for some esoteric system or system that most of us don't use."

      Two things have really bothered me, one was the fact that framebuffer console support for ATI Radeon cards was horribly broken in kernel releases that were supposed to be "stable, tested, for production". This went on forever. It started working again in 2.6.8, I think. It should have been flagged as experimental, if it didn't work. Without the framebuffer device, I can't use the system at all; it's essential to me. In fact, it's on the short list of things Linux will do, that Solaris, FreeBSD, and Windows will not do.

      The other thing that bothered me, has to do with CD Writing. It seems that in kernel developer land, more people have SCSI CD Writers, and IDE CD Writers are unusual. But in the real world, IDE CD writers are far more common, and SCSI CD Writers are prohibitively expensive. But the whole CD Writing support treats IDE CD Writers like some kind of odd hardware from the top to the bottom, and the developer of the cdrecord client has been totally unprofessional about the whole thing.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:great by bigredmed · · Score: 1

      The last time I tried that, I even took the computer to a certified Linux professional who couldn't get the PDA or ipod to work. He was the one who was whining by the end of that day.

    4. Re:great by Alioth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Palm pilots, iPods et al. are not really in the domain of the kernel developers - they are all strictly userland issues. So it would be up to distro makers and people writing KDE/Gnome programs to interface with things like palm pilots or iPods.

      USB 'plug and play' (USB hotplug) has been supported and has been working for years. I've never had a problem with USB devices where there's been a program to use them (or a driver, for example USB mass storage).

    5. Re:great by PenGun · · Score: 0

      You don't need ide-scsi any more, since about 2.6.9, one of the release candidates. Just use /dev/dvd or whatever.

      ATI is not very supportive of Linux and we only have time to reverse engineer some of the propritory crap.

      Get a Nividia card for Linux.

      PenGun
      Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    6. Re:great by gunpowder · · Score: 4, Informative

      The other thing that bothered me, has to do with CD Writing. It seems that in kernel developer land, more people have SCSI CD Writers, and IDE CD Writers are unusual. But in the real world, IDE CD writers are far more common, and SCSI CD Writers are prohibitively expensive.
      But the whole CD Writing support treats IDE CD Writers like some kind of odd hardware from the top to the bottom,


      because they are ;)
      Modern IDE ATAPI CD/DVD writers use the 'SCSI-3 mmc' command set. So basically they are SCSI Writers in IDE disguise. But internally they are not full SCSI devices, as they only support a small subset of all SCSI commands.

      As a kernel hacker, what would you do?

      1): write a SCSI Emulation layer that makes those IDE ATAPI devices act as full, real SCSI devices (from the software point of view). No redundant code, easier to maintain if done correctly.

      2): write a specific IDE ATAPI driver and one specific driver for SCSI devices. Some redundant code, but more 'optimised' for each type of device


      Linux has both.

      1) was not maintained for quite a while, and obviously was badly written at first, thus nobody wanted to clean it up and it was maked 'deprecated'. But it still offers more features than 2).

      OTOH 2) has DMA support which makes it attractive for many people, but is quite new and some app developers are afraid to support it, since the API might still change.

      and the developer of the cdrecord client has been totally unprofessional about the whole thing.

      Nobody has to love Joerg Schilling, and I often don't like his attitude either. However everybody is entitled to have his/her opinion, and in his case he thinks that everything except the SCSI way sucks (he loves Solaris and FreeBSD because they have good SCSI support). So naturally he despises 2), whereas the rest of the linux developer try to make it the default.

      He produces the best CD/DVD writing application for linux, and he knows more that most other people when it comes to CD/DVD writing. And he has a point when he says that you should still use the ide-scsi driver whenever possible, because ide-cd driver is NOT complete and still lacks important features. The problem is that since he is quite a SCSI fanatic many people are not taking him seriously.

    7. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then he was an idiot.

      start hotplug.

      plug device in.

      wow thats incredibly difficult.

      (oh yeah i forgot, install software to use device,which has to be done in windows too).

    8. Re:great by delire · · Score: 1


      i don't know about the ipod, though there is an iTunes for Linux in the works via windows emulation: http://news.com.com/Startup+to+make+iTunes+sing+on +Linux/2100-1041_3-5293915.html. most of what you talk about is not the concern of kernel developers but of the userland application developers. USB plug and play works well in linux if you have 'hotplug' on board. for the palm pilot, i have used this in the past http://pim.kde.org/components/kpilot.php and it works very well.

      if you use an integrated desktop environment like KDE or Gnome you'll find that alot of your userland problems are sorted 'out of the box'. running such a system is not my preference, however i reccommend this to new users.

    9. Re:great by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "because they are ;)"

      Fine. But go to your nearest computer store, and count the number of ATAPI CDRW devices, then count the number of SCSI CDRW devices. Next, do an inventory of the PC's around you. How many have SCSI CDRW's and how many have IDE CDRW's?

      I understand the technical reasons why SCSI is a better transport and ATAPI is just SCSI over IDE, but this doesn't matter to the end user one bit. All he wants is to write to the device, period, and it's too much to ask for this to be automatic.

      >As a kernel hacker, what would you do?

      I'd try to keep my dirty laundry off the end-user's console in a production system.

      >He produces the best CD/DVD writing application
      >for linux

      It's good when it works, which is usually. I just don't think it should be necessary to do as much diagnostic work as it is, and it should be much more obvious what arguments to give -scanbus when you want ATA, ATAPI, or ide-scsi support.

      I can deal with this interface, but then I have more than 10 years experience with Linux. I would not want to explain cdrecord to a client, and I would not want to explain the little jab in the output of cdrecord, in a professional setting.

      Ugly comments in the source code, and arguments on a developer list are one thing, but ugly comments in the console output of your application can undo credibility -- and open source credibility is not always easily gained.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    10. Re:great by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "You don't need ide-scsi any more, since about 2.6.9, one of the release candidates. Just use /dev/dvd or whatever."

      I could not make it work, tried several burners, and have reverted to 2.4 for this reason.

      "ATI is not very supportive of Linux and we only have time to reverse engineer some of the propritory crap."

      My frustration comes from the fact that the Radeon driver worked perfectly until 2.6, and then broke.

      "Get a Nividia card for Linux."

      Which one, and how can I be sure that I can get the kind of consoles I need?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    11. Re:great by flajann · · Score: 1

      It would also be great if the manufacturers of these devices released the specs so us Linux types can support them!

    12. Re:great by PenGun · · Score: 0

      Not only does linux 2.6.10 up not need ide-scsi for burning it also does much improved packet writing. You need new utilities, get dvdrecord a fork of cdrecord works great with 'dev=/dev/dvd'.

      You need prolly an mm patch for UDF file support and pktsetup but once it's done packet writing now rocks.

      It'll be the new DRI that broke. Very likely because no one is going to reverse engineer what needs to be sussed for the new DRI. Yell at ATI if you want something done. If ATI wants to keep it's secrets the developers just lose interest after a while. Nividia is far more supportive of the Linux kernel effort than ATI.

      PenGun
      Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    13. Re:great by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info.

      I don't think you understand why the thing that bothers me, bothers me so much:

      A driver that worked in 2.4 broke in 2.6, but it was never tagged in the config as "experimental" or "broken". (Not even after I reported it.)

      It really upsets me to see things presented as "stable, ready for production" that are known to be broken.

      You want to get political with ATI, and I just want hardware that's listed as compatable to work.
      If it can't work, then I don't want to see it on a compatability list, and I don't want to see it in the kernel config if I turn off "experimental." This is not an unreasonable request at this stage of the game, please.

      I'll try dvdrecord.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    14. Re:great by DragoonAK · · Score: 1

      I'm using FC3 and when I plug in an iPod it's automatically mounted. If I have gtkpod from the freshrpms.net site installed I can write mp3s and sync to it without a problem. In FC4 gtkpod won't come on the CDs but should be downloadable without changing a thing.

    15. Re:great by PenGun · · Score: 0

      Yeah what's fun for me is not fun for many, I do understand. I got into Linux because I fell in love with computers.

      Back then 'user hostile' was normal and a lot of us still like it like that. Apologies to the evangalists but I don't really care if Joe Sixpack has a hard time. I don't think Linus does either ... sorry ;).

      PenGun
      Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    16. Re:great by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "I don't really care if Joe Sixpack has a hard time."

      I don't either, but I do care when I have problems.

      I tried the dvdrtools approach, and had the first really hard lockup crash I can remember. dvdrecord -scanbus didn't find anything, there were a couple of console messages about hdd dma timeouts, and then a hard crash. I hadn't compiled magic sysrq in this kernel (2.6.11), and I might have missed whatever config option enables IDE CD writers or something, but that was just a painful experience.

      I'm back to 2.4, entirely because of this cd burning problem.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    17. Re:great by PenGun · · Score: 0

      You need to turn off ide-scsi in your kernel. Then just use whatever the device is. I can burn to my scsi cd burner and my ide dvd burner using /dev/sr0 and /dev/dvd, which is a symlink to /dev/hda.

      Even the scsi burner works fine using it's device rather than 0,0,4.

      Use hdparm to insure DMA is set for the burner.

      You need to find CD-ROM/DVD Filesystems in File systems and turn on iso etc, udf can be turned on here too.

      You need to reconfigure your kernel from scratch when switching to 2.6, a lot of 2.4 definitions have changed. An old config from 2.4 won't do.

      2.6 kernel utilities are also required.

      PenGun
      Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

  53. LOL WHAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice troll, mr LJ wanker.

  54. of course, first successful Gentoo instal yesterda by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1

    I just compiled the 2.6.10 kernel last night. I mean after several attempts over the past few years I finally got Gentoo installed (previous attempts had dependency clashes which I as a Gentoo newb didn't want to deal with). I must say that the documentation has improved though I still don't understand why the don't provide a few more scripts (hopefully cobining the partitioning, mounting, and chrooting phase --- I always seem to miss a step for forget to mount one of the partitions *GRR*).

    I guess I could have checked the recent kernel news... I'm sure an RC or two had been released. Well it's not a big deal and I've got other stuff to emerge. I just think it's funny that I'm living the troll.

    PS- the only reason I'm trying Gentoo is that I want a distro I could continuously upgrade and I wanted always the newest KDE and I figured Gentoo has the best tested bleeding edge packages. The performance, the control, and the "bloat-free" I could care less about... after all I run KDE! :P ...still miss my SuSE though. :(

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  55. Don't forget OpenIB by kcm · · Score: 1

    A lot of current development is going on at the OpenIB project.. in fact, that's where the actual 2.6.11 IB kernel bits came from.

  56. No problems in 2.6.10 for Nvidia by starwindsurfer · · Score: 1

    I am running the 2.6.10 kernel, i have no issues at all compiling the Nvidia drivers. I use NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1 fyi. I do manualy un-tar and make;make install, and cp nvidia.ko /lib/modules/2.6.10/kernel/drivers/video/ Please ask around before making baseless flames.

    --
    If you resist reading what you disagree with, how will you ever acquire deeper insights into your own beliefs?
    1. Re:No problems in 2.6.10 for Nvidia by Mondongo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. This was sort of asking around, but in the trollish way that, in Slashdot, gets you some attention. ;-)

  57. Re:Linux is dying. by wootest · · Score: 1

    He may have hidden under Windows, but at least he saw everything!

  58. ahem.. by carlmenezes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google knows all.

    err...actually, google knows all who know all :)

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  59. Re:Yay. by Nosf3ratu · · Score: 1
    It took me AT LEAST a week to install Java on Debian, and my browser is twice as slow to open as it is on Windows running on the same box.

    That's because you have several as-yet unnamed learning disabilities.

    Read: You'rea a goddamn idiot.

    --
    The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori
  60. Anyone got VIA EPIA CLE266 driver to work on this? by Brane2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    VIA's support for Linux on EPIA boards is crap and I can't compile accelerated framebuffer for CLE266 and vesafb doesn't work for EPIA.

    X11 driver works, but I need terminal emulation on framebuffer and also directFB should be quite a bit faster than X11.

    VIA is offering source, but that source doesn't compile on 2.6.10 or 2.6.11.

    It seems that there were quite some changes in fbdev in that time and I can't make that source to work with 2.6.11.

  61. Anyone have details on the XFS fixes? by Confessed+Geek · · Score: 1

    The long list of updates in the 2.6.11 kernel includes . . . updates to ACPI (define), DRI (Direct Rendering Infrastructure, which permits direct access to graphics hardware for X Window System users), ALSA (Advanced Linux Sound Architecture, which provides MIDI and audio functionality to the Linux), SCSI (define) and the XFS high-performance journaling filesystem.

    I recently ran into a bad data corruption bug with 2.6.8.(some debian specific patch number) where my NFS mounts of an XFS were corrupting files and doing block switching after we got to a certain fill level full on our raid5 arrays. Switched back to ext3 and all was well...

    If anyone else knows anything about this I would be interested...

  62. How many of these have public specs? by Lifewish · · Score: 1

    As another example, there's still no real (noncommercial) support for WinModems under Linux. Reverse-engineering is time-consuming and, these days, fraught with legal peril. As such, it makes sense to concentrate on getting a full feature suite in the areas where specs are available, rather than wasting ages trying to get one device to work cos the blasted manufacturer won't tell you what's in the box.

    My feeling is that, when the full specs of these devices are made publically available, Linux support will follow in months. If that.

    --
    For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
  63. Re:Yay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, ANYONE that installs Linux with the hope of actually using to to do things is a goddamn idiot!

  64. PPC and USB devices using VFAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't been able to mount an msdos formatted (/VFAT formatted) device since I think 2.6.7 on my albook. Works fine on my Intel machines. Has anyone else noticed this? Is it fixed?

    No ... I haven't reported it. Too worried about wasting someone's time since I didn't do a thorough enough web search ... hoping this gets an answer quickly (even if its "yeah, it's broken for me too)...

  65. Re:Yay. by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1
    It took me AT LEAST a week to install Java on Debian, and my browser is twice as slow to open as it is on Windows running on the same box.

    Sorry to hear that. With the Ubuntu Guide, it takes me five minutes.

  66. Re:of course, first successful Gentoo instal yeste by Aldric · · Score: 1

    I always find that very weird. Gentoo is one of the best distros and yet it has a torturous install process. I'm all for letting people tweak what they want but maybe they could provide a simpler install for those of us that don't actually care about all the optimization.

  67. Bug already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot use 2.6.11. There is a bug in the keyboard & mouse input code for the hardware on my machine (Dell Inspiron 1150)

    2.6.11 works great.

  68. FUCKING AMATEURS! [n/t] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  69. Re:Typical Intel Marketing blather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should consider why no one takes you seriously.

  70. If you noticed... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...it wasn't just a whine. Go re-read it again. I offered at least some idea of an alternative to the numerical karma system. Of course, I am also in favor of banning AC posts and having people use an ISP supplied email addy to get an account too, just to get rid of foul mouthed cowards and trolls like you. Not my call there but I would vote for that if it was an option somehow. I appreciate slashdot a lot, I think it serves a purpose and I like contributing what little I can, but it has obviously gotten hijacked by jerks.

  71. My favourite part of this article by incabulos · · Score: 1

    Schibler sees the inclusion of InfiniBand as a testament to the maturation of the technology.

    "Now that the technology has matured to such a point that Linus has accepted it into the kernel, the way is paved for greater distribution of the code and accelerated deployment of the technology," Schibler said.

    Its a very satisfying feeling to hear 'Our technology is now mature enough to work with linux' rather than 'Linux is now mature enough to work with our technology'. The maturity of Linux then seems to have been largely accepted as a given, rather than being seen as a new kid on the block, or a hobbyist OS as it once used to be.

    Kudos to Linus and the developers for many years of excellent work!

  72. Re:Yay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Five minutes? What sort of b0xen are you running? A 200Mhz with PIO hard-drive? Takes me a matter of seconds...

  73. Last line is incorrect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Should be:
    Nigel: (pause) "This goes to infinity."
  74. Speaking of ATI... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I want to convert my Windows XP desktop over to dual boot (for games, I must keep windoze) and I can't seem to access support.ati.com, thus I cannot download their (reportedly awful) linux drivers. I have a radeon 9600 XT... can someone help me find an alternate location to download them?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  75. Great by neo2k.dk · · Score: 0

    Nice, lets hope Alan Cox makes a patch soon !!!

    --
    neo2k