Slashdot Mirror


The History of Mozilla Firefox

Gsurface writes "Flexbeta has an article based on the history of Mozilla Firefox. The article goes build-by-build of every Firefox release since the early Phoenix days noting some of the most significant changes in every release."

147 comments

  1. changelog by brontus3927 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Isn't that normally called a changelog?

    1. Re:changelog by Vamphyri · · Score: 5, Informative

      Obligatory link to said historic changelogs list here

    2. Re:changelog by Ailure · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yep, we learnt changelog about USA in school. There was a quite few intresting upgrades during the 19th century.

    3. Re:changelog by sgant · · Score: 1

      They're still working on 1.0 though. Lots of bugs in the builds ending in 0.1968 and such.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    4. Re:changelog by DoubleWhopper · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seriously. Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome to Short Attention Sp... Oooh, look! Shiny!

    5. Re:changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually, USA 2.0 started somewhere around 1791 with the ratification of the Constitution. (USA 1.0 being the Articles of Confederation). There was an attempted fork in the mid-1800's, but the 16th Project Manager, Mr. Lincoln, prevented that from going very far. US History is much more amusing as a changelog.

    6. Re:changelog by JAppi · · Score: 1

      The Changelog is actually more interesting.

    7. Re:changelog by syousef · · Score: 1

      Actually they're release notes.

      There is some reference to feature changes etc. but I miss the days of proper, easy to read, plain text change logs.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  2. JWZ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The true history Jamie Zawinski.

    1. Re:JWZ. by starwed · · Score: 1

      The true history... stopping at 1999. While an interesting read, this was way before the release of phoenix 0.1. Hell, this was three years before [i]mozilla 1.0[/i], as the massive rewrite of mozilla's codebase was in the embryonic phase.

    2. Re:JWZ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh god, not that shit again. Listen to this bullshit: "we changed the world" No you didn't, dummy. Mosaic changed the world. You just commercialized it.

  3. Wow, the entire history!!! by sgant · · Score: 5, Funny

    From all the way back to...er...two and a half years ago?

    Wow. Good thing we have that written down somewhere, are there even people still alive that remember that far back?

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:Wow, the entire history!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I remeber the good ol days when we used to call our stripped down versions of mozilla things like Phoenix and FireBird. But thats way before your time sonney.

    2. Re:Wow, the entire history!!! by justforaday · · Score: 1

      Well, I remember the days when you could get this nifty little extension that would make it so you were running Mozilla MoonBunny or LavaWhale or whatever. I miss those days... :'( *sniff*

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    3. Re:Wow, the entire history!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when we only had sneaker net, and we had to walk up-hill, both ways, in the snow, with bare feet and we only had cardboard boxes to use computers. And we were gratefull for it! ;)

    4. Re:Wow, the entire history!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was it called sneaker net if you didn't have shoes?

    5. Re:Wow, the entire history!!! by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Bah, you youngin'.

      I remember when we used to call our stripped down version of Netscape things like Mozilla.

    6. Re:Wow, the entire history!!! by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      it gave them something to hope for!

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    7. Re:Wow, the entire history!!! by downundarob · · Score: 1

      You youngsters never learn, I rememebr when the only gui based option was Mosaic.. Even then gopher was heaps better...

    8. Re:Wow, the entire history!!! by l3ert · · Score: 1

      Yep, in those days we had to walk to the only place in town that had Internet access, uphill both ways, in order to get a copy.

      --
      per dolorem ad astra
    9. Re:Wow, the entire history!!! by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Bah! Bah, I say!

      You kids never used the WorldWideWeb browser... it had a gui, but no inline graphics.

    10. Re:Wow, the entire history!!! by Zapper · · Score: 2, Funny

      stripped down *cough*, yeah right.
      great big bloated mess of slow-loading, cpu hogging non-internet explorer goodness. :-)

      --
      So much to do, so little bandwidth.
      --
      Try Mozilla
    11. Re:Wow, the entire history!!! by Saeger · · Score: 2, Informative
      Very funny, except how much history is packed into those 2.5 years? Quite a bit. It's the whole exponential nature of progress thing. Every year that we build on past advances we compress more progress into less time (until... Singularity in ~2030).

      Oh, and FireFox NeuralInterface Edition 12.0.1 is much faster than IE 7.501 SP4

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    12. Re:Wow, the entire history!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Firefox are mammals.

      2. Firefox fight ALL the time.

      3. The purpose of the firefox is to flip out and kill people.

    13. Re:Wow, the entire history!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speed depends on what you are trying to do. A Lamborghini car runs faster than a 6-wheel truck, right? Now which vehicule will move 2 tons of rock faster?

  4. Where can we get the history of slahdot? by pacoworld · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Where can we get the history of slahdot? That would be interesting!

    1. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic? Yes... but I'd be interested too! I'd also like to see some apache log stats for the slashdot site =)

    2. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by dotslasher_sri · · Score: 2, Insightful

      offtopic.. but wikipeida does provide a very good history about slashdot. make sure you read the slashdot subculture too. hilarious!

    3. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by Reignking · · Score: 0

      We often get the history of Slashdot -- they're called "duplicates"...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    4. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by Teja · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here you can learn a bit of the history of slashdot. Also, you can browse through some of the older slashdot posts http://slashdot.org">Here

      --
      - Teja
    5. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by Teja · · Score: 1

      http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://slashdot.org has some of the older versions of slashdot, so that should give you a glimpse of the history of slashdot I suppose

      --
      - Teja
    6. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by Sunkist · · Score: 1

      ...or how about a history of slashdotting?

      --
      No, Vern. They just let him in.
    7. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about history of slashdot, but if you are interested in Slashdot history of world

    8. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh:

      1997
      July - shortlived forerunner to Slashdot, called "Chips & Dips"

      Considering the posting quality here, they should have kept the first name ;-)

    9. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by justforaday · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why would I want to read about a petrified goatse filled with hot grits? *shudder*

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    10. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      I think we get enough people complaining about dupes as it is.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    11. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Where can we get the history of slahdot? That would be interesting!

      That's simple. Just take a 1 000 000 monkeys and make them write text with computers. Save every page they produce and after a few years, you got the whole history of Slashdot.

    12. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Where can we get the history of slahdot? That would be interesting!"

      Feb 1st... Mozilla releases a small incremental version update, headline news.

      Feb 7th... Mozilla releases a small incremental version update, headline news.

      Feb 14th.. Mozilla releases a small incremental version update, headline news.

      Feb 15th... Dupe of Mozilla making a small incremental update.

      Feb 19th... Mozilla releases a small incremental version update, headline news.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once upon a time there were a couple of nerds. These were your everyday, ordinary, run-of-the-mill nerds - social misfits who were picked on in high school, interested in video games, anime, and D&D, but not really bright enough to make them capable of anything interesting. They decided that while they'd never really be able to produce anything groundbreaking, they still liked to BS about other people's achievements, and they threw together a shoddily coded website that allowed them to do so.

      Time passed and the website was a magnet for other mediocre nerds. It even managed to attract a few actually talented people, largely as an antisocial feed for their self destructive isolationist behaviors. Interestingly, while the creators could never have contributed anything meaningful over the course of their careers, they've managed to noticeably reduce the productivity of some of these folks with potential.

      Now the dot com boom: suddenly anything and everything suddenly had value! They get bought out and this website, which had been marginally scraping by, was being financed by a company with deep pockets and they were rich! Would this infusion of money take the site to the next level? Not hardly.

      Well aware of the fact that they would never be able to produce something on par with real professional journalism, they took this opportunity to slack even more, let the site coast, and sit back and count their money. Of course, the dotcom bubble burst and thier shares dropped, but they've still got plenty of money to buy themselves geek toys and sit around in their underwear playing RPGs and masturbating to anime. They also somehow have enough control of the site that nobody higher up seems to notices that it has been stagnating for years.

      So now, the site is as you see it - essentially a mindless repetitiion of stories and comments. Of the few news items that aren't dupes, they might as well be for how interesting they are. There are a variety of small coding tasks that would make a noticeable improvement to the site, but those in charge are either too incompetent or lazy (or both) to deal with them. These include things like fixing the rendering problems in firefox or coding a dupe checker what would at least prevent the posting of a story with an identical URL in it.

      Slashdot is basically the internet's version of a long burning tire fire that nobody's bothered to put out. It's a joke, and has always been. The real comedy is that it was ever taken seriously.

    14. Re:Where can we get the history of slahdot? by STrinity · · Score: 1

      ...and then on Saturday, Timothy posted twelve articles, all of them dupes...

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  5. wtf by dotslasher_sri · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    slashdotted already :(

    1. Re:wtf by oddsends · · Score: 1

      It didn't even take that long

  6. Looks like the history is history by RadioheadKid · · Score: 1

    mirrors?

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Looks like the history is history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
  7. Wow by chrisgeleven · · Score: 0

    I'm impressed with that history!

    There is a problem with the database that is preventing the site from working.

    An email has been sent to the administrator notifying them of the problem. Please try again late.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, I too sent an email to the admin. :)

      Except the message I received was more gramatically correct. ("later")

      Unfortunately, they both refer to the singular (Administrator) by the plural (them).

      It's just a stupid error message, so I should shut up now.

    2. Re:Wow by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      An email has been sent to the administrator notifying them of the problem. Please try again late.

      Apparently he does his best problem solving at night.

    3. Re:Wow by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they are using Firebird as the backend?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Wow by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      No problem I'll fill you in.

      - Firefox released 1.0PR, people got confused with what PR means. Potato and Raisin, Pizza Ready

      - Firefox released 1.0, a cazillion people switched over from IE. All this time people thought the spyware was part of every websites.

      - Firefox now owns 7% of the browser market. The number of people downloading IE.... 0%.

    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The number of people downloading IE.... 0%."

      Bullshit. IE is purchased as part of the windows package by millions. It's also downloaded(illegally) by millions more.

  8. whoops by ack154 · · Score: 3, Funny

    There is a problem with the database that is preventing the site from working.

    An email has been sent to the administrator notifying them of the problem. Please try again later.


    That administrator is going to get a LOT of emails. Oh, and I believe that "problem" it's talking about is called Slashdot.

    1. Re:whoops by GFPerez · · Score: 1

      Is the "slashdot effect" that fast? This story has just been posted...

    2. Re:whoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be new here

    3. Re:whoops by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      You must be new here...

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    4. Re:whoops by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      That administrator is going to get a LOT of emails. Oh, and I believe that "problem" it's talking about is called Slashdot.


      Wow. This time we took down a webserver *and* an email server.

      Maybe someone should submit a story about those guys who hooked a coffee pot to the web so they could brew coffee from their workstations.

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    5. Re:whoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Oh, and I believe that "problem" it's talking about is called Slashdot."
      Slashdot is a solution, to working webservers.
  9. Dead already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone have a mirror?

  10. We're looking at the wrong browser... by wcitech · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd be more interested in looking at a brief history of Internet Explorer, for the same reasons that they teach kids history in school. (to prevent it from repeating).

    1. Re:We're looking at the wrong browser... by El+Cubano · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd be more interested in looking at a brief history of Internet Explorer, for the same reasons that they teach kids history in school. (to prevent it from repeating).

      I know you are trying to be funny, but only a fool feels that his own history is not worth examining. (Hint: Mozilla has made mistakes in its own past that we should try and avoid repeating in the future.)

    2. Re:We're looking at the wrong browser... by mpath · · Score: 1
      That reminds me -- does anyone remember when IE 4 came out and they offered a Midnight Madness promotion? The release would be available at midnight and the first million folks would get a free t-shirt.

      Never got my t-shirt ...

      --
      I'm not sure what the secret to success is, but the secret to failure lies in trying to please everyone -Bill Cosby
    3. Re:We're looking at the wrong browser... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      I get the joke, but here's a link:
      The History of Internet Explorer

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:We're looking at the wrong browser... by Spheroid2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and we all know how well that works.

  11. Grrrrr. by flynns · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdotted at two comments. I blame it all on those pesky "subscribers". Slashdotting the page before us commoners can do it.

    What, are we not GOOD enough to slashdot FlexBeta?? HMMM?

    --
    'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
    1. Re:Grrrrr. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. We're plenty good enough. We just weren't *necessary* this time.

    2. Re:Grrrrr. by 1davo · · Score: 1
      Well, I for one was sorry the link worked when I checked it out.

      Too much friggin flash crap assaulting my eyes.

      No wonder they call it flash

      I look at computer screens for 10 to 12 hours a day at work.

      The last thing I want to see when I get home to do my surfing for pleasure is a bunch of cartoony flash.

      Spank the Monkey ... and win an iPod

  12. The site got slashdotted by ospirata · · Score: 1

    Does anyone knows if this text is replicated anywhere else?

  13. virtuanews database error by Random+Web+Developer · · Score: 1

    " There is a problem with the database that is preventing the site from working.

    An email has been sent to the administrator notifying them of the problem. Please try again later. "

    Wonder how much emails that guy will get

    --
    Artists against online scams http://www.aa419.org/
    1. Re:virtuanews database error by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      " There is a problem with the database that is preventing the site from working.

      There is also a problem with the administrator's email account that prevents me from notifying them of the problem. Please try again later. "

  14. big deal by us7892 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Meandering my around the ads, on this ad filled site, I finally chose the "printable version", so I could read the article in peace. I actually remember most of what is in this piece. Not much to see here...

    1. Re:big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's no surprise to see this posted. It seems that over the last few months Slashdot has turned from a "News for Nerds" site to a Firefox wankfest site.

    2. Re:big deal by BorgHunter · · Score: 1

      Tried Adblock?

      --
      "Excuse me, did you say 'Trekker'? The word is 'Trekkie.' I should know; I created them." -- Gene Roddenberry
  15. Smart thinking... by CyanDisaster · · Score: 0, Redundant

    When I tried viewing page two of the article, I got the following message:

    There is a problem with the database that is preventing the site from working.

    An email has been sent to the administrator notifying them of the problem. Please try again later.


    Now, not only is their site slashdotted, but their mail server as well.

    Hope be with ye, Cyan

  16. The history of IE by michelcultivo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Day 1: New feature implemented Day 2: 10 bugs discovered today Day 3: Thats 10 bugs give me into another 2 bugs Day 4: New feature that work only with IE (haha netscape guys!!) Day 5: That feature give me another bug (Arrrhh!) Day 6: Where we are going today with this *#*$@!?

  17. /.ed by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    well, if not the history of FF we can at least appreciate the legacy of /. I can't read the story, the server's database is dead.

    guys, it's really simple and I now do it when I post content anywhere: .nyud.net:8090

    oh well, if not the history of FF, here is a link to my FF extension.

    1. Re:/.ed by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      its a shame when a site gets slashdoted like this , the main advantage of nyud.net is the coral cach is Ad safe (the origional site is credited with the Click etc iirc, this takes away the major mirroring concern of alot of people)

      PS: :P i should now do my speach about tacking on ads , but i know a couple of people who would find the extension very usefull so i shall instead forward the link to them

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:/.ed by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      isn't history of FF also an ad of some sort? In any case this is an FOSS site and the software in question is GPLed.

  18. themes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    screen shots shots.osdir.com

  19. /. Your E-mail by BinaryLobster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Niffty way to enhance the /. effect to include your e-mail server too.

    ------

    If we were all rocket scientists, there would be more uses for rockets.

  20. Re:You know your old skool... by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know your old skool if your school education did not include spelling or grammar.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  21. 1st Page. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The History of Mozilla Firefox: From Phoenix, to Firebird, to Firefox
    Posted by Team Flexbeta on 30 March 2005 (3291 views) Rating: 5

    Page 1 - Introduction
    Firefox is not just a browser; it is a religion, a way of life some might say, and for others, like me, a great damn way of reaching the web without all the ugly stuff that comes with it. Firefox has gone a long way, from name changes to added features, to conquering market share off of the world's most popular browser. Firefox has reached millions via not just web, but also through newspaper headlines all funded by Firefox users themselves. Many of the current Firefox users have been loyal users since the bird's initial flight, and though Firefox has been in the wild now for quiet some time, there are plenty of Firefox users that have recently discovered this marvelous browser. The Firefox browser was previously known as Firebird and before that, Phoenix. While the name has changed, the concepts remain the same. The history of Firefox begins with an idea to make an already existing web browser faster and leaner. Originally dubbed Phoenix, the browser within a few years turns into a revolution, an escape for many from the constant security vulnerabilities from Internet Explorer. The story starts with Phoenix 0.1, and builds up to what we know today as Mozilla Firefox.

    I'll try to get more but don't hold your breath.

  22. let's hope by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's hope for the day they can add "Firefox usage overtakes IE usage" to that page. Although it may not be perfect, Firefox (pheonix, firebird etc) has been revolutionary - and I believe it has generally increase people's awareness about the web.

    Well done to all the developers involved in the developement. Keep up the good work.

    1. Re:let's hope by xander2032 · · Score: 0

      Firefox is a pile of shit. And I sure hope it dies soon! I'm a Mozilla suite user, and there's no way I'll touch Firefox, not after they betrayed us all. The Mozilla organization has become very unprofessional, and really I don't see them lasting for much longer. I hope Firefox dies a quick death!

  23. History of slashdot is here. by RandoX · · Score: 1
  24. since 0.2 by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 1

    I've been using Firefox since the 0.2 release, and exclusively since 0.3, when it became good enough for everyday use.

    1. Re:since 0.2 by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      Can I have your autograph? The impact of this story has just blown me away and you, sir, are my hero!

  25. why? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what's the point of things like this? Is this really news?

    I'm not a paying subscriber and I'm not one to bitch about the stories but "Someone posted the FireFox changelog" is not news.

  26. cant they just do a search on Slashdot? by night_flyer · · Score: 1

    version .01 released,
    version .02 released,
    version .03 released,
    version .04 released,
    version .05 released,
    version .06 released,
    version .07 released,
    version .08 released,
    version .09 released

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:cant they just do a search on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... with all the dupes on slashdot it'd look more like:

      version 0.1 released,
      version 0.2 released,
      version 0.3 released,
      version 0.3 released,
      version 0.3 released,
      version 0.3 released,
      version 0.4 released,
      version 0.4 released,
      version 0.4 released,
      version 0.4 released,
      version 0.4 released,
      version 0.4 released,
      version 0.4 released, ...etc...

    2. Re:cant they just do a search on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, you can't.

  27. Mirrordot mirror by Winckle · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Mirrordot mirror by alfrin · · Score: 1

      Well at least we get the cache of the wonderful indroduction page, i never wanted the History anyways.

  28. Mirrordot cache by amembleton · · Score: 2, Informative
    Mirrordot cache

    Just like Slashdot, coral cache doesn't seem to have a working copy.

    1. Re:Mirrordot cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I has the first page of the article mirrored, which is worthless, as always.

  29. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I'm like "All Right! I got it to load even though it's slashdotted!!!" And then I see that it's page one of six :(

  30. 3rd Page. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The History of Mozilla Firefox: From Phoenix, to Firebird, to Firefox
    Posted by Team Flexbeta on 30 March 2005 (4112 views) Rating: 5

    Page 3 - Phoenix 0.4 - Firebird 0.7.1
    Phoenix 0.4
    Build 0.4 added a homepage icon to the toolbar by default. The popup whitelist was also improved; now users were able to manually add websites which were exempt from the popup blocker. Improvements were also made to tabbed browsing and shortcut keys. Users were able to toggle between tabbed windows by using shortcuts. The Mozilla team also tweaked the address bar to permit users to just enter the name of the URL, and then press Ctrl + Enter, which automatically added the WWW. and .COM.

    Phoenix 0.5
    Though Phoenix 0.5 did not go through much UI improvements from its previous build, there was plenty of under-the-hood tweaking and bug fixes. Phoenix 0.5 was equipped with Intellimouse 5-button support, which meant users can now use their mouse's back and forward button. In previous builds, if you closed Phoenix it would not remember its previous state, such as if you had the sidebar open. Phoenix 0.5 would now remember a user's last state which the browser was in. Phoenix 0.5 also saw a noticeable file size reduction along with less memory usage than 0.4. The ability to open history items in tabs was added, and the longstanding bug that history quicksearch was case sensitive was also fixed. The download manager went through a fumigation phase; tons of bugs were exterminated including the bug that caused -1 to be displayed as the progress.

    In general, Phoenix 0.5 went through a huge bug fix overhaul. A few of the bugs that were fixed includes the menubar staying disabled after customizing the toolbar under certain circumstances, effectively rendering that browser useless, also a longstanding full screen bug that made the feature a pain to use was patched.

    Firebird 0.6
    Phoenix users were definitely in for a surprise when the Mozilla Team decided it was time for a new name, and new look for the browser. The name of the browser had to be changed in order to avoid trademark issues with a company called Phoenix Technologies, which markets a browser of its own. After months of brain-storming, the Mozilla team rested on a new name, Firebird. However, the name Firebird would have to be changed again later because Firebird was the name of an open-source development project that produces a relational database.

    Though the new browser sported also a new name, the general layout did not change much; a new default theme was used however for Firebird 0.6. New icons were introduced for every button on the toolbar. The term "Preferences" was switched for "Options", and the Options window obtained some eye candy. Firebird 0.6 also included a new privacy feature, which allowed the user to clear all privacy data including form data, history, cache and cookies with a single click. If Firebird 0.6 crashed, the user was now able to submit a message to the developers about this error. Firebird 0.6 also introduced automatic image resizing; which shrinks any image that is bigger than the window to make the whole image visible. Smooth scrolling was also introduced in this version, along with a few bug fixes. MAC OS X fans were also in for a treat with Firebird 0.6 announced support for the OS. However, Firebird OS X users were experiencing many bug issues. Firebird 0.6 did see a 5MB file increase from its previous version.

    Firebird 0.6.1
    Before running Firebird 0.6.1, users noticed that the executable icon for Firebird was change. No longer did the icon resemble the Mozilla Browser icon; now Firebird had its own identity. Firebird 0.6.1 was mainly a minor bug-fix release fixing a few critical issues in Mozilla Firebird 0.6. Some of the bugs that were fixed in this build included:

    * Fix for the auto-complete crash bug
    * Fix for the DOM security restriction bug that broke many bookmarklets
    * Rich Text Editing support
    * Toolbar buttons for cut, copy and paste
    * Brushed up d

  31. Sounds exciting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Coming next: build-by-build history of Linux, including every minor release.

  32. error! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Database error:

    mysql error: Too many connections

    mysql error number: 1040

    Date: Thursday 31st of March 2005 03:48:48 PM

    Script: /main/articles.php?action=show&id=89

    Referer: http://slashdot.org/articles/05/03/31/1959253.shtm l?tid=154

  33. Text, sans images... by wx327 · · Score: 5, Informative

    - Flexbeta (http://www.flexbeta.net/index.php)
    -- The History of Mozilla Firefox: From Phoenix, to Firebird, to Firefox (http://www.flexbeta.net/articles.php?action=showd &showarticle=89) Flexbeta Home
    The History of Mozilla Firefox: From Phoenix, to Firebird, to Firefox
    Posted by Gsurface on 30 Mar 2005 - 22:41
    Introduction

    Firefox is not just a browser; it is a religion, a way of life some might say, and for others, like me, a great damn way of reaching the web without all the ugly stuff that comes with it. Firefox has gone a long way, from name changes to added features, to conquering market share off of the world's most popular browser. Firefox has reached millions via not just web, but also through newspaper headlines all funded by Firefox users themselves. Many of the current Firefox users have been loyal users since the bird's initial flight, and though Firefox has been in the wild now for quiet some time, there are plenty of Firefox users that have recently discovered this marvelous browser. The Firefox browser was previously known as Firebird and before that, Phoenix. While the name has changed, the concepts remain the same. The history of Firefox begins with an idea to make an already existing web browser faster and leaner. Originally dubbed Phoenix, the browser within a few years turns into a revolution, an escape for many from the constant security vulnerabilities from Internet Explorer. The story starts with Phoenix 0.1, and builds up to what we know today as Mozilla Firefox.

    Phoenix 0.1 - 0.3

    Phoenix 0.1
    Firefox begins not as Firefox, but as Phoenix, which was initially made public on September 23, 2002. The Phoenix browser, which uses a large amount of the Mozilla code, was designed to be a lean and fast browser that loads in about half the time of Mozilla. The initial release was codenamed "Pescadero", which means fisherman in Spanish, with a build of 0.1. Phoenix did not feature an installer, rather the user had to download the file and run the executable. Though the menus were customizable, there wasn't much to add to the toolbar. The only items that were available were the home icon, print icon, a go button and a button to go to the Mozilla home page. Though still a baby, Phoenix had a lot to offer such as a download manager which IE did not contain. Looking into the preferences, Phoenix 0.1 had little options for the user (compared to newer builds). This initial build did not contain a Google search engine on the toolbar, but it did contain a popup blocker and tabbed browsing. Certain shortcut features such as writing the URL then pressing Ctrl + Enter to automatically enter the .COM part of the URL was not available in 0.1. Phoenix 0.1 did not include a sidebar, which in the second release the Mozilla team would implement it.

    Phoenix 0.2
    The second release of Mozilla Phoenix, build 0.2, codenamed Santa Cruz, was released a few days after 0.1 on October 10th, 2002. Plenty of features were added to this new build including the sidebar, which allowed the user to view either their bookmarks, history, or recent downloads as a side window of the browser. Other enhancements were implemented including new options to the preferences section. Now users were able to disable Java and edit some tab browsing options. Phoenix 0.2 also introduced the ability to add extensions and themes to the browser.

    The toolbar customization went through a huge overhaul. The user was able to add much more icons to their toolbar including a history icon, downloads, bookmarks, new window and a search bar. The search bar was for searching on the current page, dmoz.org, and Google, of course. Phoenix 0.2 was also marginally faster than 0.1, though it was very hard to notice the difference. Though some bugs were fixed in this build, the Mozilla team concentrated more on enhancing the browser and dedicat

    1. Re:Text, sans images... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Whew. 2 name changes... good job they did their homework and, being so desperate to have a unique name, finally settled on a name that was really unique!

    2. Re:Text, sans images... by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      Pity the ads at the top didn't show up. The one says "Fix Internet Explorer!" and the other says "Internet Explorer Fixed!" which was quite appropriate for this article I think.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
  34. printable version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the printable version of the article, I was still able to get this to load even though the rest of the site is slashdotted to hell:
    http://www.flexbeta.net/main/printarticle.php?id=8 9

  35. It's all there in The Book by Juiblex · · Score: 1

    "And so at last the beast fell and the unbelievers rejoiced. But all was not lost, for from the ash rose a great bird. The bird gazed down upon the unbelievers and cast fire and thunder upon them. For the beast had been reborn with its strength renewed, and the followers of Mammon cowered in horror." from The Book of Mozilla, 7:15 P.S: Ain't Mammon that Devil's son in the Constantine movie?

    1. Re:It's all there in The Book by dirty · · Score: 1

      Yeah and Balthasar was a demon in the movie, despite traditionally being one of the three magi that visited Jesus at his birth. The other two being Melchior and Casper.

      --

      -matt
  36. Have a look by Swamii · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Going way back to Slashdot circa 1998, posing the question, "Should Netscape GPL Mozilla?"? Link is http://web.archive.org/web/19980113191222/http://s lashdot.org/

    --
    Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    1. Re:Have a look by HalliS · · Score: 1
      I couldn't find the poll it self, but after some googling I found this post:
      -----------------


      Netscape should GPL their code (Score:1)
      by StuffYourReligion (452006) Alter Relationship on Tuesday October 01, @07:03PM (#4368887) (http://www.nomeaning.net/)

      On Jan 6, 1998, CmdrTaco wrote:
      Perhaps the solution to Netscape's problem is more obvious then they may realize. If they GPLd their code and gave it out to the world, we would have a slew of powerful browsers developed by the same programmers that have brought us all those other great GPL apps. That would jump start the free browser universe and maybe people would focus on a single browser instead of dividing their time amongst so many other free browser projects. And since it is free, people may choose it instead of MS. Just a thought...


      Just a thought, indeed... though I'm glad there's a diversity of free browser projects. Too bad Netscape waited so long; from here it's a long, uphill battle to regain ground.
      --------------
      (Archive.org doesn't seem to have said poll or the CmdrTaco editorial in it's archive..)

      Slew of browsers you say?
      --


      My other UID is 1337
  37. Mirrordot by bonch · · Score: 1

    Mirrordot has the article mirrored.

    1. Re:Mirrordot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has the first page of the article mirrored and no images, which is worthless, as always.

  38. Another Mozilla Article? by bryan8m · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've lost track of how many Mozilla posts there have been on Slashdot in the past few days. Glad to see it's really starting to catch on though!

  39. Thanks /. ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I'll never get to find out which version of FF I should download. On the other hand, we will at least get to have The History of Flexbeta:

    3:15 Article on FF history posted on Flexbeta
    3:19 Slashdot posts article about Flexbeta's article
    3:20 Smoke starts coming from Flexbeta
    3:21 Sparks fly from Flexbeta
    3:22 Feeding tube is removed from Flexbeta
    3:23 Flexbeta is dead. R.I.P.

  40. Some admins use sms by Baorc · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to post it again, but after it got /.'ed it sends an email to the admin everytime someone visits it.

    Thing is, some admins have a message sent to their cell phones everytime one of their sever crashes, on top, usually that costs 0.05$ a message. Actually I have no clue but for arguments sake let's say it was 0.05$. Take a guess at how many people clicked that link sending a message to his email who, if enabled, sends a message to his phone.

    I really don't want to see that bill!

    1. Re:Some admins use sms by Tristandh · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you think in case of multiple instances of 1 error (take /. for example) 1 mail would be sent saying "We're having trouble, fix it" (and maybe at regular intervals an update on the situation)? I'd be surprised if many admins of a site with any serious traffic has his server send him an email everytime en error occurs.

    2. Re:Some admins use sms by Baorc · · Score: 1

      But from TFA which I didn't paste because so many other people did in their comments, it said an email had been sent, hence the message from the email, its purely hypothetical.

  41. Slightly on topic by acebone · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just found this delicious article on howstuff works:

    http://computer.howstuffworks.com/firefox.htm/prin table

    BTW - I keep forgetting the name of the service that provides automatic mirroring of websites. It is some stateside university that is behind it. Wouldn't it be a GREAT idea if either story submitters or Slashdot story posters browsed through the links in a submission via that service and then posted the alternate URLs as well as the original ??? Or am I commiting sacrilege by proposing something that could almost kill the slashdot effect ?

    --
    Check out my PHP Url Validator
    1. Re:Slightly on topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we *need* the slashdot effect. It helps give servers the beating they deserve.

  42. ignorant piece by NynexNinja · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its pretty ignorant for someone to write a piece about the "history of mozilla firefox" without discussing Netscape, Mosaic, etc...

    1. Re:ignorant piece by jonored · · Score: 1

      I do find it sad that the article doesn't contain those origins of Firefox. I find it pleasantly amusing that Netscape could be seen as pulling an Atreides move when they threw themselves to open source, and now here we have it, this decendent of Netscape, coming back and challenging Internet Explorer's grip on the 'web. But then, I suppose I just like the comparison of open source developers to fremen and microsoft to house harkonnen...

    2. Re:ignorant piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would that be ignorant?

      It's a piece on the history of Firefox, nobodies interested in reading about other browsers if they open this article, nor does the article attempt to act in some way biased, saying that its better than any other browser ever made.

  43. They missed something. by northcat · · Score: 0

    They missed the part where The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.

  44. history? by wjeff · · Score: 1

    I love Firefox as much as the next geek, but come on guys, do you think we can limit the historical studies to subjects which have not come about within the lifetime of a teenager, much less an infant.

    --
    my old sig is obsolete, and I haven't come up with a stupid enough new one yet
  45. Slashdot confirms... by Tribbin · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... Mozilla Firefox is history.

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  46. Firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's this Firefox you speak of? Is that anything like my Firebird?

  47. I thought this one was interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Release 0.7] 2004-01-13 Peter Akin
    * Introduced rendering bug to annoy a huge segment of our user base.

    ---

    Maybe the next release will have an about:config setting to disable this feature *fingers crossed*

    user_pref("accessibility.slashdot.tomfoolery", false);

  48. Mandatory coral caching before posting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the reasons I like lurking here is the concentration of "scary smart" coding types.

    Can SOMEONE please come up with a way for all submitted links being coral cached before throwing them out to the wolves?

    How about a little app that kicks open a popup window when a story is submitted. Before the story is accepted the submitter must browse all applicable links in this slave window. All links are cached and THEN the story is posted, with coral'd links included. (And possibly a 'See original page' link?)

    Anyone able to write this? Or better yet, anyone with a better idea? :)

  49. Experience by AShuvalov · · Score: 2, Funny

    Experience is that nice thing, which let you recognise your old mistake when you do it again.

    --
    Andrew
  50. Slight, very offtopic, language correction. by perseguidor · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Pescadero" the codename for 0.1, doesn't mean 'fisherman' in spanish. That would be "Pescador".

    "Pescadero" is the person that sells the fish.

    --
    O make me a mask
  51. tried ff and went back by chunderfest · · Score: 2, Interesting
    No matter which part of the phase you joined the team of Firefox users; there is one thing I am sure of, once you go Firefox, you never go back.

    I joined at 0.8 and left again at 1.0. The mozilla suite is just plain more stable, often faster, and doesn't have ff's longstanding habit of crashing when printing to a file if CUPS is installed. In addition, while the extensions architecture may be clunkier in the suite, it's also more robust (for me at least). ff 1.0 kept dropping my extensions.
    --
    Ah, bitter dregs.
  52. It didn't start with Phoenix 0.1 by Draconix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Technically, it started with Netscape, then moved on to Mozilla. At the end of 2001, some Mac OS X developers came along and decided to create a stand-alone browser for OS X based on Mozilla, without the extras like the HTML editor, IRC client, email client, etc. This browser was first released as Chimera in the beginning of 2002. Chimera steadily got more and more popular under OS X, and ended up being _the_ browser for OS X users until Apple finally released Safari. After the success of Chimera in its first few months, Phoenix was conceived as, effectively, an attempt to combine the simplicity of Chimera with the cross-platform capability and UI of the main Mozilla browser. In other words, Phoenix didn't just pop up out of the blue, it had an inspiration that (sadly) most people seem to have forgotten.

    Yes, I am using what Chimera became (Camino), and yes, perhaps I am a bit of a fanboy of it. It's an extremely solid browser, and despite its popularity waning due to Safari, it's still being developed, and I'm happy with its progress.

    --
    By reading this you acknowledge that you have read it.
    1. Re:It didn't start with Phoenix 0.1 by ahg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Technically, it started with Netscape

      Technically, the original Netscape was a derivative of NCSA Mosaic

      Conclusion: Firefox started off as Mosaic, written by grad students... like all good software :-)

      --

      --Aaron Greenberg

  53. It's happening by kryptik_79 · · Score: 1

    I saw it in December:

    Firefox 933,550 sessions, 23.73%
    Internet Explorer 887,065 sessions, 22.55%

  54. KARMA WHORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  55. From the article... by fondue · · Score: 1

    "Firefox is not just a browser; it is a religion, a way of life some might say, and for others, like me, a great damn way of reaching the web without all the ugly stuff that comes with it."

    "Ugly stuff" such as a few short paragraphs of text drowned in innumerable pages of intrusive god-damned advertisements.

    --

    Preferences > Homepage > Customize stories on homepage > Authors > Zonk > Uncheck

  56. Firefox isn't a fox! It's a red panda.. by dcbarker · · Score: 2, Informative

    A half-decent article but he/she mentions Firefox as being a small red fox. It's not. It's a red panda. One glimpse at the Firefox FAQ reveals this..

  57. Wikipedia has one too by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 2, Informative

    See History and development of Mozilla Firefox. Might be useful to compare against this article.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  58. Printable link was:changelog by papukanghi · · Score: 1

    What crap breaking down the page into a million pages. here is the printable link

    http://www.flexbeta.net/main/printarticle.php?id=8 9

    --
    ( 2b || !2b)
  59. Re:JWZ. / Firefox rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That may have been true 6 years ago. I myself wouldn't have thought that it eventually becomes what it is today.

    But they made it in the end. It survived, and now it conquers the world.