Slashdot Mirror


New Releases for Debian and SUSE

linuxbeta writes "With the recent SUSE LINUX 9.3 Live DVD ISO released, we get a sneak peek. (screenshots) of this much anticipated OS update. Cool updates in 9.3 includes Firefox 1.0, OpenOffice.org 2.0, Gimp 2.2, Beagle. Xen, VoIP client, and more." And while Debian's Sarge isn't here yet (give Branden Robinson a chance to find his plush new office!), wrochal points out that the fifth update to Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 ("Woody" ) has arrived. 3.0 (r5) "mainly adds security updates to the stable release, along with a few corrections to serious problems." Also, four packages were removed, three for license violations.

223 comments

  1. Grr. by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's "peek", not "peak", ffs.

  2. Word usuage.. by spineboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well there was a mountain-load of screen shots.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Word usuage.. by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 1

      Ouch! The punnage!

    2. Re:Word usuage.. by michelcultivo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Screenshots is not valid to see if the distribution is well developed and is in a solid state to use.
      I can't see in screenshots if a application is the best to use, if it haven't bugs. Any search in google brings me a lot of screenshots.

    3. Re:Word usuage.. by hhlost · · Score: 1

      Scoll down and you'll see a horizontal scroller with more shots.

  3. The fourth package's removal reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was too sexy.

    1. Re:The fourth package's removal reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to debian.org the reason for removing the other package was: "Program doesn't work anymore".

      I guess that's an acceptable reason.

    2. Re:The fourth package's removal reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an IM client that speaks an obsolete protocol (gabu gabu or something like that) that nobody uses.

    3. Re:The fourth package's removal reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOOOO! How will I contact my friends that only have gabu gabu now?!

    4. Re:The fourth package's removal reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC gabu-gabu is one of those russian things. They have their own little world over there.

    5. Re:The fourth package's removal reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's called gadu gadu and there have been recently added a package called libgadu3 to testing("sarge").

    6. Re:The fourth package's removal reason? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      Just use ekg.

      Btw, Gadu gadu is a polish messenger. FYI.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    7. Re:The fourth package's removal reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Btw, Gadu gadu is a polish messenger.

      Ah, now that makes sense. I've heard a lot of people say that Debian lacks polish.

    8. Re:The fourth package's removal reason? by m50d · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you know what these license violations were? The links to the packages are all broken, presumably because the packages have been removed.

      --
      I am trolling
    9. Re:The fourth package's removal reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes. Scroll to the bottom of this page and read under the heading "Removed Packages".

    10. Re:The fourth package's removal reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you know what these license violations were? The links to the packages are all broken, presumably because the packages have been removed.

      Yes, the reasons are listed here at the very bottom: http://people.debian.org/~joey/3.0r5/

      • eemu, eemu-client - Bug#258921: License violation. Debian is not permitted to apply changes other than for paths and directories.
      • gg-gnome, gg-gtk, gg - Bug#257620: Package can not be used anymore due to protocol changes.
      • gstar - Bug#252885: GPL licensed with non-free component, hence not distributable
      • xzx - Bug#240941: This package cannot legally distributed with its current license that forbids any modifications.
    11. Re:The fourth package's removal reason? by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      Ah, now that makes sense. I've heard a lot of people say that Debian lacks polish.

      No No no no no!
      Debian has plenty of polish, but they realized who the hell needs a messenger to tell you about things getting polished?

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    12. Re:The fourth package's removal reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best Mr. Coward,

      I bet you could, if you really tried, and did it hard - and try not to be afraid of this, as it can prove to actually be a rather efficient way of, you know, chatting - give them a call. By phone. Yeah, I know it sounds scary.

      Yours sincerely
      --
      A. Coward

    13. Re:The fourth package's removal reason? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Debian polished? heck, it's petrified

  4. Package Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Has anyone else seriously considered sexual reassignment surgery. As a fellow pre-op transexual, I would like to hear your thoughts.

    1. Re:Package Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What do you call a female sex change operation?

      An addadicktome.

  5. Multimedia by spineboy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Getting multimedia to work with Suse is still somewhat of a pain. Yes mplayer does a fairly good job, but there are still tons of files/formats that just don't play right off the bat. I'm a fairly advanced user and have been using Linux for six years now. I actually bought COdeweavers and have installed mplayer. I still get plenty of problems with various formats, but eventually get it to play.

    This strategy will not "draw" in the crowds - most people give up before tinkering with the system. It has to work smoothly right out of the install (mostly).

    I generally think Suse is one of the most polished distros out there, but it still has a way to go with multimedia, to get it to appeal to joe-computer user and Grandma who are scared of "breaking" things on the computer.

    Linux is on the cusp from going from "hacker" OS to main-stream, but still has some catching up to Windows in certain things - mainly multimedia. Yes I know there are plenty of programs that work great - but the average user, I think, would not have the expertise to get it to work easily right off the DVD.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the specific case of multimedia playback, the problems are mainly because the media corporations have got national governments in the US and EU to pass unjust laws making it exceptionally difficult for linux distros to legally support playback of many video formats. There's little technical obstacle, it's just the distro manufacturer not wanting to get sued for software patent infringement. I think the only long-term solution is a micronuke at the patent office.

    2. Re:Multimedia by hacker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      These all work great on Debian and have for years, if you use the w32codecs package from a non-Debian package repository.

      I'm sure SuSE can't ship it because it requires packaging some potentially copyright-violating codecs that are the byproduct of reverse-engineered streams and other "unscrupulous" things.

      I can use mplayer, xine, xmms to play dvd, cd, mp3, mpeg, wav, ogg, ogm, avi, RealMedia, Windows Media, QuickTime, and probably a dozen of others that don't come to mind right now...

      Just because SuSE doesn't have it, doesn't mean it can't be done with Linux.

    3. Re:Multimedia by ssj_195 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately, media formats are things that tend to be patented to the hilt, so I'm guessing Novell have to tread very carefully with what formats they can support out of the box. It's worth noting that in other distros (e.g. Mandrake via the PLF, and Gentoo; probably others, too), getting mplayer to play damn near every format in existence is pretty much effortless.

    4. Re:Multimedia by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1, Interesting


      I've just moved from Mandrake 10.1 to Ubuntu (Sarge in disguise) and it's beautiful. Almost everything I'm installing is saying "No, I don't want anything more thanks, I've got all my dependancies right here." The same goes for multimedia - most of it was ready for me, and the rest was remedied by a quick download and uncompressing of the essential codecs package at mplayerhq.

      If we can just hold off the European patent laws a little longer then I think we've almost arrived at user-friendly linux.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    5. Re:Multimedia by jdray · · Score: 1

      I'm running SUSE 9.1 and know just what you mean. What really seems strange to me is that Kaffeine is included as a standard component with the system, but the default "run with" application for most media files seems to be Noatun, which, as far as I can tell doesn't play much. Almost every time I try to play something, it won't play in Noatun but plays fine in Kaffeine. [grumble, grumble...]

      The biggest pain is that, without a convoluted chain of software installation that I can't seem to accomplish (I'm no luser, but I'm no l33t h4ck either), I can't play DVDs. [grrr....]

      On another front, I was reading that the 9.3 release is supposed to have better capabilities where roaming from one wireless network to another is concerned. With 9.1, every time I try to use a different network, I lose the key for my primary network at home and have to re-enter it when I get home. [grumble, grumble...]

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    6. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is what's frustrating me especially now as linux draws ever closer to working just how an OS should. I'm getting old too, and the constant poking at ever changing (but almost there!) systems is wearing thin.

      At times, I feel we're always taking another step half way to completion. 5 years ago it was 50% there, later, 75%. Wasn't long until 87.5%... then 92%... the closer we get, the slower the refining a good desktop OS. the SuSE multimedia isn't too bad a problem all up, but as an oldbie I'm tired of fiddling. Ubuntu, Debian Sarge, Sid, Gentoo, FC3, Mandrake. None with show stopping bugs, but always something that doesn't work right and I have to chase down. A Graphics card not supported at full native LCD resolution. Sound not working how it should. Good, but not perfect. Five out of ten common media formats playing OK on one distro, 7 out of 10 on another, and a different 6 out of 10 on yet another. All work, but only across 3 distros and I just can't be bothered chasing down the exact reasons why to fix them, because I know they'll break (just a little bit, not even a great deal) in the next release.

      What you've read are the rantings of a unix oldbie who is so frustrated with linux creeping ever so close to complete usability in my eyes, but never-quite-getting-there. My son in law uses OS X, and allows me to use his powerbook as I need. Never thought I'd say it, but I'm considering using a mac. Might even delete that terminal and sit in my rocking chair listening to DRM music and relax.

      Hell, I can always come back to Linux when it's 'there' for me, right?

    7. Re:Multimedia by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 2, Informative

      A roaming profile tool came out with 9.2 and is still with 9.3. Update your system.

    8. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh you should try using Gentoo now. Nearly everything works as it should out of the box, and except for some problems I always have with printers it can do everything you need. Don't worry about mplayer, it'll do all you need - you don't need to do anything special but get everything working with it and your right.

    9. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Let's not beat around the bush -- distributing the w32codecs package is a copyright violation and there's nothing "potential about it. It is illegal everywhere under the Bern Convention.

      Whether you care or not is your problem, but Linux distros tend to be picky about this copyright stuff.

    10. Re:Multimedia by kosmosik · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > I generally think Suse is one of the most
      > polished distros out there, but it still has a
      > way to go with multimedia, to get it to appeal
      > to joe-computer user and Grandma who are scared
      > of "breaking" things on the computer.

      They removed some multimedia support (DVD, MP3? I think it is about it) from some *reasons* not just because they cannot make it right. These reasons are legal difficulties - namely MP3 codec distribution issues (it is not free, when you distribute more than 100000 copies you need to pay Philips AFAIK) and DVD-CSS issues (I think it is illegal in US). SuSE is now US based (Novell) and they need to be legal. I belive only free (as in beer) version is crippled without multimedia. If you actually *buy* boxed set it should play MP3 and so on (I don't know how with DVD-CSS but they just could attach some propertiary program to play DVDs). So if you wish to pay you will get paid multimedia features, if you wish not to pay you don't and need to get it running on your own (which is perfectly legal - it just cannot be distributed this way).

      So it is not like Linux distributors don't want to distribute this stuff - they cannot.

      > Linux is on the cusp from going from "hacker" OS
      > to main-stream, but still has some catching up
      > to Windows in certain things - mainly multimedia.

      I use Linux on daily basis as my workstation and never had any problems (well actually there were some like 5 years ago - now it is close to perfect) with multimedia. Mplayer plays just about any file format you can imagine - I often find Windows Media Player to not play some files, mplayer does it all out-of-the-box - no problems with searching for codecs etc. with proper setup you just click on file and it plays - I don't have any problems with multimedia and Linux. There are some areas that Linux is lacking, but IMHO it is not multimedia...

      My distro of choice is Fedora - it also comes without some multimedia support - but adding it is as simple as adding one line to config file and issuing one command. For grandpa or smth. it is a matter of opening terminal and copying and pasting
      one command. And then it works so please don't dramatize. Or go get boxed paid distribution and you will get it all out-of-the-box.

      > Yes I know there are plenty of programs that
      > work great - but the average user, I think,
      > would not have the expertise to get it to work
      > easily right off the DVD.

      Look it is like installing one program and running it and you got DVD running. It is exactly the same as on Windows (does Windows Media Player play DVDs?). Actually I usually recommend anyone using Windows to install VLC Media Player - from my experience it works best. It is like somebody IMs or calls me and asks "look I've got this AVI file from my mail and I click it and it does not play - what should I do?" and I just point them to website or give them setup.exe URL and it works for them, where Windows Media Player does not. And VLC is aviable on Linux too.

    11. Re:Multimedia by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      Forgot to mention this earlier but it's not that hard to watch DVDs in Suse. Install apt. apt-get update, apt-get install MPlayer.

    12. Re:Multimedia by RidiculousPie · · Score: 1

      Windows media player will not play DVDs out of the box. However it will play them if you install other DVD software, eg. PowerDVD or WinDVD. I also recommend VLC, it plays everything media related I have ever found. At risk of flying wildly off topic, FFDShow (IIRC) provides some codecs for windows and is on Sourceforge, but it doesn't enable WMP to play DVDs, I don't know of any free software (GPL or similar) that does, but would be interested to hear if anyone knows of any.

      --
      ah, mod points ... now where is my crack?
    13. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem you are haveing playing DVD's is normal. Linux (out of the box) dosen't support CSS Decoding, dvd protection software, becuase of legal problems. The only DVD the system will play without any additional libraries are those that do not have CSS Protection, which means that 99% of the ones you buy you won't be able to play. Now there is a work around for this but for reasons I can't tell you where to get the file you need, it is illegal (if you live in the US and other Countries) but all you need to id DVD Jon and you probably can figure it out from there.

    14. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Illegal everywhere except North Korea that is.

    15. Re:Multimedia by nietzsche_freak · · Score: 1
      parse error: missing terminating " character
    16. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These reasons are legal difficulties - namely MP3 codec distribution issues (it is not free, when you distribute more than 100000 copies you need to pay Philips AFAIK)

      You have to pay to Thomson, which collects for the various patent holders (apparently Fraunhofer, Thomson and Coding Technologies). And judging from their roality rates, you pay from the first unit.

      SuSE is now US based (Novell) and they need to be legal.

      Well, they also had to 'be legal' as a German company. They even had to comply with US law if they wanted to do business in the USA (which they did). Maybe the concerns (or awareness? Or pressure?) just got bigger.

      My distro of choice is Fedora - it also comes without some multimedia support - but adding it is as simple as adding one line to config file and issuing one command.

      At least for MP3s, you don't even have to add a line to a config file with SuSE 9.3. Just run Yast Online Update, select the multimedia packages and you are done.

    17. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Great Leader prefers RealPlayer.

    18. Re:Multimedia by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Mods are on crack today. Modding up as Insightful some idiot who can't install Mplayeron Linux? Especially a distro that has precompiled MPlayer rpms built for it?

    19. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Sunday evening and all, so I'll bite. Been using Linux exclusively for 4 years, without any problems (even with an ATI card running xorg-x11!)

      I agree SuSE is relatively advanced in terms of Linux distros - it's updated quickly and smoothly, and they have the whole boxed distro w/ included manuals thing going (YaST rules, yo!).

      But getting multimedia capabilities & cutting edge packages right off the bat - well, of course, I'd recommend Gentoo for that.

      # emerge win32codecs
      # emerge mplayer

      Or, in place of mplayer:

      # emerge xine-ui

      whatever takes your fancy, really.

      What more could you need? Real/AVI/MPEG/etc, all available right off the bat in win32codecs. Incl. decss (or # emerge libdvdcss if you'd rather) for DVD playback.

      Smooth? Oh yeah. I think SuSE/Redhat et. al. are good and all, but for the hardcore Linux user, I'd recommend Gentoo to get the best experience. especially when it comes to multimedia. If you're a n00b &/or installing an ub3r-n00b's box, then, seriously, what better way can you have than issuing two commands to get most avi/mpeg/real/dvd playback than with gentoo. Can you even dream of doing the same with Win32 or macos? I think not :-/

      Of course you have to wait for everything to compile, but with the right USE and CFLAGS it'll all be worth it, I promise :-)

      Unless you wanna go for LFS, but that's a tad more hardcore than most are willing, i'd hazard...

      Whatever takes your fancy, I guess. Good Linux'in ya'll!

    20. Re:Multimedia by kosmosik · · Score: 1

      > Windows media player will not play
      > DVDs out of the box.

      So this is exactly like with SuSE - you need to perform additional steps to watch DVD - namely install software.

    21. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, because that software is not legally available for Linux endusers.

    22. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Ubuntu (Sarge in disguise)"

      I think you mean Sid in disguise.

    23. Re:Multimedia by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Why does eveyone always suggest MPlayer? Yes, yes, I know it plays a lot of stuff but there is Xine you know. (http://xine.sf.net/)

      1. $ emerge -pv xine-lib

        These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
        Calculating dependencies ...done!

        [ebuild R ] media-libs/xine-lib-1.0-r1 +X -aac +aalib +alsa (-altivec) +arts +cle266 -debug +directfb +dvd +dxr3 +esd +fbcon -ffmpeg +flac -gnome -i8x0 -ipv6 -libcaca +mng +nls +nvidia +opengl +oss +png +samba +sdl -speex -theora +v4l +vidix +vorbis +win32codecs -xinerama +xv -xvmc 0 kB


      That's a pretty impressive list, if you ask me.
      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    24. Re:Multimedia by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1
      Never thought I'd say it, but I'm considering using a mac.

      And you'd still be using a *NIX based OS and second-guessing yourself about it why?

      1. :-)
      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    25. Re:Multimedia by squatex · · Score: 1

      Dont get much easier than this.

      http://cambuca.ldhs.cetuc.puc-rio.br/xine/

      Google is amazing huh?

    26. Re:Multimedia by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Great another Gentoo zealot showing us Gentoo commands. Because MPlayer plays everything and the keyboard shortcuts for it are by far the most intuitive? Because Suse ships a crippled xine and it's really freaking easy to run "apt-get install MPlayer"? Because this a Suse topic? Come on, now.

    27. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      playback, the problems are mainly because the media corporations have got national governments in the US and EU to pass unjust laws making it exceptionally difficult for linux distros to legally support playback of many video formats.

      So just include easy to use install scripts that will grab these things off the intarweb and install them.

    28. Re:Multimedia by yo_tuco · · Score: 1

      "...Nearly everything works as it should out of the box..."

      Ha, when I upgraded to the 2004.3 PPC version on my PowerBook (haven't done the new ver yet), I went through hell! It was broken in every respect. I had to do a complete reinstall plus learn more about udev/devfs than I cared to know. And today, I still don't have the all the features working and I'm tired of chasing down why some applications don't compile without errors. The x86 version is obviouly more polished.

    29. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest pain is that, without a convoluted chain of software installation that I can't seem to accomplish (I'm no luser, but I'm no l33t h4ck either), I can't play DVDs. [grrr....]

      You might just be a luser. I use SuSE 9.1 and I can watch DVDs just fine. I just install libxine1-1_cvs-040727.i686.rpm and then install xine-ui-0.99.2cvs-040725.i586.rpm and then install libdvdcss-1.2.8-2.network.i386.rpm and after that every one of the DVDs in my DVD collection plays fine. Installing from an RPM ain't exactly rocket science.

    30. Re:Multimedia by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Great another Gentoo zealot showing us Gentoo commands.

      Survey says?!? BZZZZT
      I am, buy far and large, NOT a "Gentoo zealot". It just happens to be the distro of MY choice. I usually reccomend MDK or SuSE to people.

      it's really freaking easy to run "apt-get install MPlayer"?

      Can't the same be said for
      1. urpmi mplayer
      2. emerge xine-ui
      3. apt-get install xine

      etc.....
      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    31. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you'd still be using a *NIX based OS and second-guessing yourself about it why?

      Because Apple is a bastard company full of lawyers who go after anyone and everyone including Apples own supporters and fanbase. If you just want a good OS then a Mac might be it. But some of us don't like supporting corporations that behave in the way that Apple does.

    32. Re:Multimedia by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 0, Troll

      Then why aare you posting this stuff in a Suse/Debina discussion in a Suse thread? Useless info.

    33. Re:Multimedia by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      two words:
      mouse button_s_

    34. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Mandrake has had this for a while now (I've been doing this since 8.x or 9.x).

      First, you need to know about Mandrake's 'urpmi', which is like apt-get or yast or yum, but for Mandrake. Give it somewhere that has Mandrake rpms, and it will install from the web with all dependencies done for you.

      Second, you need to add a place that has the right codec rpms and multimedia rpms. I think plf.zarb.org is the best choice here.

      Check out easy-urpmi here:

      http://easyurpmi.zarb.org/

      Once you add those sources, you can install many multimedia things instantly with no dependency fuss through the GUI or command-line.

      Ubuntu is nice, but some problems it solves aren't really problems once you figure out where to look.

    35. Re:Multimedia by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      Then why aare you posting this stuff in a Suse/Debina discussion in a Suse thread? Useless info.

      Can we say troll?

      The parent poster's info is plenty useful. Using his/her distro of choice, the poster was simply illustrating how another media player could be just as sufficient. Looking at the long list given of supported options, I'm certainly impressed that Xine could do the job just fine, at least as well as Mplayer.

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    36. Re:Multimedia by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      My distro of choice is Fedora - it also comes without some multimedia support - but adding it is as simple as adding one line to config file and issuing one command. For grandpa or smth. it is a matter of opening terminal and copying and pasting
      one command. And then it works so please don't dramatize. Or go get boxed paid distribution and you will get it all out-of-the-box.

      Please... Do yourself a favor. You can sit there and say that it's oh-so-easy to add a line into some config file, but try to get "grandpa or smth." to even know what cutting and pasting is all about. Slashdotters can all consider it second-nature to cut and paste something into a terminal, but based on my "grandpa or smth." technical support experience, if it doesn't work correctly without any fiddling, you've just scared away most Aunt Betties or Grandma Phyllis's from using your "computer and program" (whole computer, not just the OS, mind you), because it's broken, as far as they're concerned.

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    37. Re:Multimedia by poolmeister · · Score: 1

      The K-Lite Mega Codec Pack (free download) enables playback of pretty much anything in Windows Media Player, including DVD,Real,Quicktime.

      --
      CN=poolmeister.OU=lurkers.CN=slashdot
    38. Re:Multimedia by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      Because of a belief in the moral or pragmatic superiority of free software, I'd think.

      Personally, I don't really care about Unix or its derivatives. GNU/Linux is the most functional free operating system for my needs, so that's what I use. Being based on Unix doesn't automatically make something any good.

    39. Re:Multimedia by kosmosik · · Score: 1

      OK. Actually my point was that it is not more difficult than on Windows - it is just different (but for somebody who does not knows Windows nor Linux it will be the same). On Windows you need to install software to play DVDs and some media types (WMP does not play everything). On Linux well, you need to install software. It is the same thing.

    40. Re:Multimedia by KiloByte · · Score: 1
      For Debian, I would really add:
      deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ stable main

      to /etc/apt/sources.list before installing mplayer. The version in the main archive is crippled down because of legal concerns.

      Usually, out-of-Debian apt archives are of poor quality, but, as Christian Marillat is a Debian Developer himself, he knows how to make it work right. His archive is widely known as debian-non-legal.
      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    41. Re:Multimedia by Kaydet81 · · Score: 1

      I'm new to SuSE Linux but have worked with various OS's over 20 years ... is a SuSE Linux upgrade like (yikes!) Windows - i.e. is it better to wipe the system (I'm at 9.0) and do a fresh install, or does it work well to simply upgrade?

      I'm getting ready to move (finally) to XP at work from Win2K, and I simply won't allow an in-place upgrade of Windows - I very specifically stated that they must format the system & do a fresh install. (BTW, my Windows system at work is merely an e-mail tool and a VNC portal to a Red Hat system, where I do my real work.)

    42. Re:Multimedia by winse · · Score: 1

      I have had
      problems
      with suse historically. looks like they've cleaned up a bit.

      --
      this sig is deprecated
    43. Re:Multimedia by dhuff · · Score: 1

      Garbage. OS X has supported multi-button mice from the get go. Buy a USB mouse with as many buttons as you'd like and plug it in.

    44. Re:Multimedia by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      No, the upgrade works fine with Suse.

    45. Re:Multimedia by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      I understand your point, but the same point applies to Windows with these people-- If it can't play AVIs, they assume one of two things: 1.)"This dumb file must be for a Mac, or something", or 2.) "My Computer is broken."

      True, it's not much more difficult, but it's still nearly impossible grasp for your mom-n-pop set, regardless of what OS you're installing on their system.

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    46. Re:Multimedia by jdray · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, that sounds like the chain of installation I tried, and you're right, it's pretty easy to install from an RPM. Indeed, I prefer the command line interface over YaST for controlability. But I ran into library version problems (I don't remember which "so" file was the troublesome one, but it was a showstopper), creating compatibility problems with other software I have installed. I basically ended up giving up on the project to wait for the next upgrade (which looks like it will be 9.3 at this point).

      But thanks. Even given the fact that you lead your post with a slap in the face, I'd mod you "Informative" if I could. Oh, except that you posted AC. tsk... such promise, too...

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    47. Re:Multimedia by tigmonkey · · Score: 1

      true dat. i bought an optical three button mouse, yanked out the original and plugged my new one in. it worked straight away, i didn't have to install drivers.

    48. Re:Multimedia by xpyr · · Score: 1

      Actually linux needs alot of standardization in it. Standard gui, standard cli as in using bash for example, standard sound package utility, standard install/removal (just been completed so I'm happy), standard libraries, etc. Right now all it really is, is a glorified appliance OS. Windows isn't, and that was fixed way back with Windows 95.

      Windows makes it easy for developers to develop on because all these standards have already been set in their OS and so they're better prepared to say they're app works in all flavours of windows and just have one release of it instead of having several releases for every version of windows out there, like they have to do with linux distros right now. Linux can be a platform OS instead of an appliance OS. I know it can.

      And plus look at the version of firefox that comes with it, 1.0. 1.0.3 is now out. Can I go and install a new version of firefox without it having to be made for that specific distro? Nope, not yet anyways.

    49. Re:Multimedia by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1
      Thank you for "covering my back". You said it FAR FAR better than I could've.

      1. Thank you.


      P.S.
      I'm a guy... :-)
      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    50. Re:Multimedia by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      You're trolling.

    51. Re:Multimedia by xpyr · · Score: 1

      Nice reply, too bad u avoided every one of my points that I made. Shows that my points are valid.

    52. Re:Multimedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But at the same time:

      josh root # emerge -pv mplayer

      These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

      Calculating dependencies ...done!

      [ebuild N ] media-video/mplayer-1.0_pre6-r4 -3dfx -3dnow -3dnowext +X -aalib +alsa (-altivec) +arts +avi -bidi -cdparanoia -debug -dga -directfb -divx4linux -doc -dts -dv -dvb -dvd -dvdread -edl +encode +esd -fbcon -ggi +gif +gtk -i8x0 +ipv6 -jack -joystick +jpeg -libcaca -lirc -live -lzo +mad -matroska -matrox -mmx -mmxext +mpeg -mythtv -nas +nls -nvidia +oggvorbis +opengl +oss +png -real -rtc +samba +sdl -sse -sse2 +svga -tga -theora +truetype -v4l -v4l2 -xanim -xinerama +xmms +xv -xvid -xvmc 7,144 kB

      Total size of downloads: 7,144 kB

    53. Re:Multimedia by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      Ok, let's take a look at your "valid points"

      -standard gui. Nope, that's the distro's or
      user's choice. Linux is a kernel, nothing
      more


      -standard cli. Nope, that's the distro's or
      user's choice. Linux is a kernel, nothing
      more.
      There's korn, bash, etc...

      -standard sound package utility (WTF are you
      talking about?) ALSA?

      -standard install/removal. Once again, WTF?
      apt-get? yum? rpm? autopackage?

      As far as your little complaint about FireFox, yes you can upgrade it. Generic rpms abound unless rpm -Uvh is too hard for you to run. And Suse did add 1.0.3 as an update a day afterwards. The more I think about it, the more I realize that was a moronic statement. Are you telling me you've never had to update IE after installing your vaunted Windows?

      Now repeat after me:
      "Linux is not a GUI, not a distribution; it is a kernel. What distributions choose to do with it is their choice. Anyone can customize Linux however they want."

      Linux is not Windows. Capice? Your remarks show that you just want Linux to be like Windows, one standard GUI, standard everything and probably one company to standardize it all. That shows you don't understand about choice and exactly how much freedom you have with Linux. Stick with Windows. If it's too much trouble for you to learn how one distro works or even how a few work, stick with XP, there might be a revison of it in a year or two.
      As far your little "server appliance" remark, Amazon, IBM, Novell, the National Security Agency, Google all disagree with you. But your remarks clearly show you don't actually run Linux yourself and have little to no experience with it. It just blow my mind everyday that I can download something for free designed by a community that beats Windows on the desktop (if you're not afraid of a new GUI besides XP's nonsense) and blows Windows away on the server side of things.

  6. OpenOffice 2.0????? Isn't it in beta still? by kwanbis · · Score: 3, Informative

    OpenOffice 2.0????? Isn't it in beta still?

    1. Re:OpenOffice 2.0????? Isn't it in beta still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      OpenOffice 2.0????? Isn't it in beta still?

      Yes, but Firefox 1.0 is positively outdated. So it averages out okay.

    2. Re:OpenOffice 2.0????? Isn't it in beta still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it in beta still?

      It sure is, but hey, what would linux be without buggy beta programs that crash all the time? What, "Debian" you say?

    3. Re:OpenOffice 2.0????? Isn't it in beta still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, with "Debian" you can run obsolete unmaintainted programs that crash all the time, like KDE and Gnome 1.x.

    4. Re:OpenOffice 2.0????? Isn't it in beta still? by Linzer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right, it IS in beta. And the worse part is, there are good reasons for that. Last time I checked, it still had show-stopper bugs. I have seen a couple presentations that will not load in Impress 2.0beta without making it crash. I'm really puzzled to see they included it in Suse 9.3. I wonder how much patching they've been able to do before releasing it. I don't expect miracles, anyway.

      --
      Gravitation is a theory, not a fact.
  7. wow by Assimil8or · · Score: 0

    I didn't know KDE could look so clan and smooth

  8. Re:Removed packages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There are est. 20 new packages each week inserted into testing("sarge").
    this is a maintenance release.
    unfortunatly.

  9. Clan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know KDE could look so clan and smooth

    Okay, I know "clan" must be a typo for "klan" but either way, what does that mean?

    1. Re:Clan? by Kesha · · Score: 1

      It's not clan or klan. It's klean ;-)

    2. Re:Clan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha. Now I komprehend korrectly. Thanc you.

    3. Re:Clan? by Kesha · · Score: 1

      You are welkome

  10. Re:Way to stay on the edge.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    learn about debian and be quiet.

  11. Re:Way to stay on the edge.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'm going to assume you're being sarcastic here seeing as OO.org is/was recently in beta, and the GIMP 2.2 isn't even classed as 'stable' in Gentoo yet. SUSE are known to be version number chasers. They've been doing it for a while, and if they're not careful it could bite them in the ass.

  12. Congratulations editors! by Metteyya · · Score: 3, Funny

    Direct link to ISO file on Slashdot main site. Let the slashdotting begin!

    1. Re:Congratulations editors! by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      And currently, in the midst of a ./ing, I'm getting 368Kb/sec down on that DVD ISO.

  13. Re:Way to stay on the edge.. by ssj_195 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OO.o at least is officially on 1.1.14; 2.0 is merely a beta. Gimp 2.2 is not that old, but yes, I'd expect 2.4, at least. I've immensely surprised about Firefox, though - very strange indeed, especially as nearly all of the updates since 1.0 have been security based, rather than adding new and unstable features.

  14. Kernel version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not a current debian user, but how do you tell which kernel verion corresponds to this release?

  15. Re:Multimedia--BS by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 0

    You're on crack, right? You actually bought Codeweavers to run MPlayer ? The project that bills itself as "The video player for Linux"?
    So what was too difficult?
    1. Googling for the MPlayer RPM?
    2. Using apt to install it (apt-get install
    MPlayer)
    3. Untarring it and installing it the old fashioned
    way.

    Or.... buying Codeweavers to run a Windows port of a Linux app on Linux.
    Let me help you. Install apt and apt-libs. Run apt-get update, apt-get install MPlayer. Got it?
    As far as MP3s go, I have Suse 9.3 right here and Juk playing all of my music imported right off my iPod which was supported fine using ipod:/ in Konqueror just as Suse said it would be.
    I know you're probably either just trolling or afraid to actually Google for something but did you know there's 4 Multimedia packs you can download and install for free in Suse 9.3 using Yast?

  16. 1+1=2 by CygnusXII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So we have the recent crying session, over ubuntu and kubuntu being harmful to debian,when actually it comes to be a concern over "Release" dates and Press. Smells fishy to me.

    --
    My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
  17. Re:Removed packages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ubuntu is Debian with 'less software', dick.

  18. 2.4.18 by XanC · · Score: 1

    They're not going to change kernel versions for a maintenance release!

    1. Re:2.4.18 by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      2.4?? Rubbish. Suse 9.1 system:
      Linux version 2.6.5-7.151-default (geeko@buildhost) (gcc version 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)) #1 Fri Mar 18 11:31:21 UTC 2005

      Even this kernel is showing its age but this is one of my off-the-mill PCs, nothing fancy so no kernel rebuilds.

    2. Re:2.4.18 by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      He was talking about debian.
      Debian 3.0 (Woody) came with 2.4.18.
      GGP wanted to know which kernel comes with the new (r5) for Woody. GP replied that kernel versions are not changed for a maintenance release (Which is true - some things are backported, but the API and a significant portion of the code stays at 2.4.18).
      You've mistaken this debian thread for a SuSE thread.

      HTH

  19. Let's clear something up right now by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 4, Informative

    I got Suse 9.3 Friday after ordering from Novell.com 2 weeks ago.
    mp3s work out of the box using Juk.
    I watch DVDs using MPlayer which I installed using the apt port for Suse.
    There are 4 mulitmedia packs you can download from Suse using Yast.
    Understand?

    1. Re: Let's clear something up right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hi

      newbie using suse here - u mention that there is a port of apt for suse? how does it work? some info would be appreciated

    2. Re: Let's clear something up right now by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read this. Go here. Let me know if you need help after reading those links.

  20. mplayer and copyrighted DVDs by 80+85+83+83+89+33 · · Score: 1

    not to troll here, (and using a windows port would turn me off too) but half the time we either can't get audio to play correctly in mplayer, or the damn copy protection is causing problems. methinks RIAA is making it tough for linux users. actually, almost everywhere i go, i see problems with playing back rented or bought DVDs, even on (especially on) stand alone DVD players for TVs.

    --
    i disable sigs
    1. Re:mplayer and copyrighted DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at a video rental store, and every week have a pile of new releases I must watch to be able to make recommendations to customers. I have never, ever had a problem playing a DVD on my computer. DVDs play just fine in ogle or mplayer (or totem), and the sound is totally dependable. Sounds like you have a problem with your individual setup.

  21. My Computer? by pmazer · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice the "My Computer" icon? Eww

    1. Re:My Computer? by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I noticed it in the last release, 9.2

    2. Re:My Computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In light of recent events which have shown that Linux is insecure, I agree that we should protest the "My Computer" icon, for all future revisions should be called "Your Computer".

    3. Re:My Computer? by Heliode · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my computer pisses me off

      --
      Fox can take the sky from you.
    4. Re:My Computer? by GROOFY · · Score: 0

      Additionally, it appears to be a (now defunct) iMac G4. Does SuSe even run on PPC?

    5. Re:My Computer? by xgamer04 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did anyone else notice the "My Computer" icon? Eww

      Yeah, but the icon is a picture of Tux in front of an iMac, so that evens it out.

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  22. NEVER, ever do this again, editors! by Stupid+Dog · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just thought that Debian Sarge was released and was already ordering a church service to thank god at last!

    1. Re:NEVER, ever do this again, editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too, only I was going to thank Satan. The one and only true god of debian. The greatest OS on this planet!

    2. Re:NEVER, ever do this again, editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought satan was the god of BSD? (Take a look at the FreeBSD mascot for further evidence..)

      Oh well. With something as deliciously good as Debian, it has to be EVIL!

  23. Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And while Debian's Sarge isn't here yet"

    You have got to be kidding. It's time Debian lowers the flag and lets Ubuntu take the lead.

    1. Re:Debian by jesterzog · · Score: 1

      It's time Debian lowers the flag and lets Ubuntu take the lead.

      Why?

    2. Re:Debian by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps because Debian's flag only has 13 stars.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:Debian by AndyCater · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ubuntu can potentially take the lead to create a one disk desktop distribution and the basis for some customised Debian distributions on three or four platforms. Debian provides infrastructure on 11 architectures and a wider selection of packages, some of which Ubuntu choose to mirror in their universes. Both distributions need the other to some extent and there is no particular "one size fits all" mentality for either of them.

    4. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      haha. You troll what you do not understand.

      Debian and Ubuntu are complimentary.

      It's not Debian vs Ubuntu, it's Debian AND Ubuntu.

    5. Re:Debian by mp3LM · · Score: 1

      Yes, but think of how stable Woody has to be by now! After 4 years of being the stable release, this thing must have no bugs! Actually, the r5 release makes it seem like things are starting to look up for debian. That's the second release this year! At this pace, Sarge should be out in 2 months! Don't forget me saying this, 2 months. June 17, 2005, we will have a stable Debian Sarge!

    6. Re:Debian by Skepparn · · Score: 1

      yeah, but what about the package repositories, and the likelyhood of me getting debians repositories to work in ubuntu?

      --
      ... Disclaimer: I barely know how to Read, please dont expect me to spell right!
  24. can we get a torrent for the Live ISO..? by dBLiSS · · Score: 1

    can we get a torrent for the Live ISO..?

    --

    The Good Life
    1. Re:can we get a torrent for the Live ISO..? by dlichterman · · Score: 2, Informative
  25. OpenOffice 2.0? by psi42 · · Score: 1
    This screenshot shows what appears to be a "ximianized" version of OpenOffice 2.0. The Ximian page doesn't seem to indicate this has happened.

    Does anyone know where to get binaries of this little gem? A few higher-quality icons REALLY goes a long way...

    --
    Defenestrate Windows...
    1. Re:OpenOffice 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's the modded out openoffice that suse has been pushing the last couple releases....i suppose you could go it the .src.rpm from their site if you want to hack it into a different distro...

    2. Re:OpenOffice 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually its been "KDEified". Those are kde and koffice icons. Suse did that in Suse 9.2 OpenOffice also.

    3. Re:OpenOffice 2.0? by Stevyn · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gentoo has had a ximian openoffice in portage for a while. It uses the openoffice source with some added patches. I'm not sure how one would get this working without portage, but it may be a good starting point.

      Keep in mind though, you need over 4gb of free disk space just to compile the darn thing. But I'll admit it looks nicer and integrates better into KDE.

    4. Re:OpenOffice 2.0? by psi42 · · Score: 1

      Well, I decided to just go ahead and build it. It's been compiling for about 12 hours now...

      --
      Defenestrate Windows...
  26. Torrent by dlichterman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Join the torrent
    torrent link

  27. releases by darw!n · · Score: 1

    Debian doesnt release very often, so who knows how long until sarge gets here?

    1. Re:releases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sarge is currently on an active tour of duty and will be released when he gets his orders from the Kernel.

    2. Re:releases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great contribution.

  28. The other shoe drops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Debian's jig is up.

    1. Re:The other shoe drops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Don't think so. I use Sarge almost 100% of the time. I've tried Ubuntu Hoary, it's currently installed on another partition of the same machine. I have 0% problems with Sarge. Hoary, while yes, it's nice and slick etc.. gives the occasional lockup. The most recent required a press of the big red button, as the mouse would move, but both the display, and keyboard input were frozen. This is only the latest glitch I've experienced, and I can't seem to find any reason, as they have all been different, and aparently random.

      So, in a nutshell, I'm still more than happy with Debian just the way it is. A release would be nice though, granted. That way we can move on to things like x.org. The next version of testing is gonna be SWEET!

  29. Torrent anybody? by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Hey, providing ISOs for FTP without also providing Torrent files was their own choice - it's not like Suse's never issued a popular release before, so if the Novell takeover made them forget to use the torrent, that's their own choice.

    However, I haven't found a torrent for it. Torrent Reactor has some 9.3 versions, including a 5 CD set, but not this one LiveDVD version.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  30. rats by mortonda · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I just downloaded 9.2.

  31. Excuse me? by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

    Can Linspire play DVDs? Why, yes. It can play DVD's. What's more, the Linsoire DVD player is Xine. Some how, little Linspire has managed to figure out how to legally play MP3's and DVD's.

    If Linspire can do it, then there is no excuse for any commercial distro not to be able to play MP3s and DVDs. Just like real commercial distros such as Windows and OS X are capable of.

    1. Re:Excuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually quite easy -- Linspire just paid the DVD tax, just like Apple did.* So that's quite simple if you don't care about your OS not being redistributable. Linspire also negotiated a deal with Microsoft to ship Windows Media support, IIRC.

      (* Windows doesn't actually play DVDs OOB, but your Hardware OEM probably bundled the software on your machine.)

    2. Re:Excuse me? by kosmosik · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Can Linspire play DVDs? Why, yes. It can play
      > DVD's. What's more, the Linsoire DVD player is
      > Xine. Some how, little Linspire has managed to
      > figure out how to legally play MP3's and DVD's.

      So? It is exactly as I've said - you need to pay for it. They bought paid licenses for DVD support and distribute closed/propertiary version. And you need to pay for it. So what exactly is your point?

    3. Re:Excuse me? by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

      It's actually quite easy -- Linspire just paid the DVD tax, just like Apple did.

      Obviously, they paid for the license. Which is why I meant that there is no excuse for any commercial distribution to not also pay for the license. I don't expect Debian or Gentoo to pay for licenses but, if Linspire can afford it, surely Novell can.

      So that's quite simple if you don't care about your OS not being redistributable.

      Provided the the distribution vendor has paid for the license, there should be no issue with redistribution. Its not as if Novell isn't making any money on the distribution. They are charging nearly $100 for it. Linspire is only charging $50 for their distribution plus $10 for the DVD player if you are a member and $40 for non-members.

    4. Re:Excuse me? by FreeLinux · · Score: 1, Redundant

      They bought paid licenses for DVD support and distribute closed/propertiary version. And you need to pay for it. So what exactly is your point?

      The point is the SuSE/Novell have chosen to not pay for the license and there is no excuse for this. There is no DVD support in the paid-for version. There is simply no legal DVD playback support or MP3 encoding in SuSE. Yet little-ole Linspire was able to afford this "heavy" licensing fee and still ship its distro and DVD player for a lower price than SuSE 9.3.

      This is particularly ironic since Novell just sent out a DVD bundled with their Connection magazine but SuSE can't leagally play that DVD.

    5. Re:Excuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very unlikely that the DVD licence allows for redistribution of DVD player software. They want a fee for every copy shipped.

    6. Re:Excuse me? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Informative

      If the dvd is data, that's a moot point. If the dvd is video, then it depends on whether or not they used any encryption for the disc. The only time you really need special apps like decss is to decrypt encrypted video dvds.

    7. Re:Excuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then just have the DVD player software only shipped with the boxed Linux distros and removed from the freely downloadable ISO images.

    8. Re:Excuse me? by ahillen · · Score: 1

      The point is the SuSE/Novell have chosen to not pay for the license and there is no excuse for this. There is no DVD support in the paid-for version. There is simply no legal DVD playback support or MP3 encoding in SuSE. Yet little-ole Linspire was able to afford this "heavy" licensing fee and still ship its distro and DVD player for a lower price than SuSE 9.3.

      On the other hand, it seems to me that Linspire does not allow you to copy and share the distribution with friends (you get a 'Family license' for your household, and I guess, these licensing issues might be one of the reasons for that). With SuSE, that is allowed. If I have the choice between being able to add MP3 support with a few mouse clicks via online update and being allowed to share the distribtution with friends (like SuSE does) or having a more restrictive license that doesn't allow me to share the distribution, I would rather take the SuSE approach.

  32. Yeah it looks ok but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...why does Linux spend it's entire time trying to be Windows 95?

    Because to me it's really strange. A hell of a lot of Linux users seem to spend their time hating on Windows. Fine Windoze sucks. But why does every Linux desktop look like Windows ? That same bluey default feel. Shitty Windoze 3.0 aliased font with the dashed selection outline. The 'My Computer' thing.

    Seriously, Move on. Stop trying to recreate Windows in Linux. Stop being inspired by Windows. Let KDE and GNOME people find their own style instead of trying to copy ancient horrible OSs.

    I know it's hard but you people really have to think a little bit bigger.

    1. Re:Yeah it looks ok but... by Princess+Tarja · · Score: 1

      I agree %100, I never understood the mentality of copying a ui that resembles the ui that you hate so much ( ok ok it's really the os that's hated but nm ) then again ppl give me grief for being a hardcore xfce user (v3 & 4) they still think CDE in their minds while they blindly go on using kde.girl geek powr! hahaha

      --
      Step out of the box and enjoy life
  33. Re:Multimedia - Your complaint in context by delire · · Score: 1


    Getting multimedia to work with Windows XP is still somewhat of a pain. Yes Windows Media Player does a fairly good job, but there are still tons of files/formats that just don't play right off the bat..

    Annotated Links: http://www.google.dk/search?hl=da&q=windows+%2B%22 can't+play+divx%22&btnG=S%C3%B8g&meta=

  34. More Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The SuSE news was submitted to /. awhile ago but they didn't bother to post it until today...

    More info about the SuSE stuff can be found: http://www.abend.org/article.php/20050417154931165

    and http://www.abend.org/article.php/20050415002147486

    Another interesting article, Gartner: Novell to take Linux market share?: http://www.abend.org/article.php/20050413232948738

  35. A lot of Screenshots by michelcultivo · · Score: 1

    Screenshots is not valid to see if the distribution is well developed and is in a solid state to use.
    I can't see in screenshots if a application is the best to use, if it haven't bugs. Any search in google brings me a lot of screenshots.

    1. Re:A lot of Screenshots by potentiallyprofound · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "screenshots *are* not valid..."

    2. Re:A lot of Screenshots by mikefe · · Score: 1

      I think this link might get you prettier ones.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
  36. XEN by bstadil · · Score: 1
    Anyone gotten Xen to work. My Thinkpad throws a

    Oiee CPU0 is history.

    No harm done but kind of a scary error message.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:XEN by Anthony+Liguori · · Score: 1

      Yup, every system I have access to (including a T41p that I'm writing this message on) run Xen just fine.

    2. Re:XEN by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 2, Informative

      That particular error isn't very user friendly ;-) Come on the xen-devel list (see http://lists.xensource.com) and we may be able to sort you out. Alternatively, someone on #xen at OFTC may be able to help.

    3. Re:XEN by El+Gordo+Motoneta · · Score: 1


      Oh, don't worry. That error message can be ignored safely. ...

      BTW, if you are STILL reading this, your processor is living on borrowed time. ... just kidding =D

  37. Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Cool updates in 9.3 includes Firefox 1.0, OpenOffice.org 2.0, Gimp 2.2, Beagle. Xen, VoIP

    While Debian 3.0r5 features such exciting and new software packages as Mozilla 1.0, GIMP 1.2, KDE 2.2 and GNOME 1.4 among others. No version of OpenOffice.org is available.

    Sheesh, I don't think Debian rX releases are newsworthy, call me when they finally manage to get a release out with packages only two years old instead of the current 4. :P

  38. Reasons why Sarge shouldn't be released yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope these to get into Sarge before it goes stable.

    Kernel-2.6.12 (soon) or at least 2.6.11
    GnuPG stable 1.4 (2004-12-16 18:24:48 CET)
    Subversion (svn) 1.2 (to be released any day now)
    Xen 2.0.5 (released)

    Sure, gcc 4.0 would be nice too but lets be reasonable and give Sarge a chance to release this year.

    1. Re:Reasons why Sarge shouldn't be released yet by jesterzog · · Score: 1

      I hope these to get into Sarge before it goes stable.

      If the next one is going to take as long as this one, I'd be concerned about such things, too. There will always be new releases of some packages, though, and the line has to be drawn somewhere. With any luck, Branden's going to be able to speed up the release process somewhat and it won't be an issue.

  39. "Also, four packages were removed" by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    This is only the beginning, grab what you can now for tomorrow it may be gone.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  40. A little more on the multimedia debacle by LibrePensador · · Score: 4, Informative

    Right on brother. And here are the facts that no one in the Suse camp wants to face up to:

    1) Turbolinux, a distribution with a lot less mindshare and less money can afford to ship you a legal DVD player for $69 but somehow Novell cannot do so?

    1a) Unless you are a corporate buyer, you see HP's Suse notebook comes preloaded with PowerDVD.

    2) Slide two of the Suse silliness presentation is not that they not ship multimedia codecs out of the box. If that were our only problem. Debian, Red Hat and Mandrake do not ship libdvdcss or any of the other codecs, but once you add them, your existing Totem or Kaffeine players play.

    2a) But no, Suse has to go way beyond what's required and actually goes into the source code for Xine and Kaffeine and cripples so that even if you add the missing codecs/libraries, it still will not play.

    2b) So what do you do? You have to remove kaffeine, xine, xine-libs ad nauseam and then install apt-get and install those programs from a third-party and hope that it doesn't break anything else. Why is this bad?

    Because you no longer get updates for those packages from Suse and because mixing apt and yast sources can often leave your system in an inconsistent state.

    All of this is a damn shame, because Suse is an awesome distribution with some stupid, stupid, stupid policies that have no legal or logical basis.

    Hopefully, this long response will serve as a permanent rebuttal to all of the Suse fanboys. Liking a distribution should not be tantamount to giving them carte blanche to screw you over.

    Summary of facts:

    1) Suse ships DVD-playing software whenever the hell it pleases it.

    2) Other distributions manage to ship a dvd player for $69, yet Suse costs $85-99 or more.

    3) Suse cripples standard libraries and thus has disqualified itself from the home market. I will not touch it for these reasons and I have stopped recommending it to friends and clients.

    --
    Pragmatism as an ideology is not particularly pragmatic in the long term. Keep it in mind when you dismiss Free Software
    1. Re:A little more on the multimedia debacle by Jonny_eh · · Score: 4, Informative
      Hmm, it wasn't too tough for me to get DVDs and other media formats working. Just install kaffeine and company (i.e. libdvdcss) from packman's yast repository. And since it's not apt-get, it won't break the system's consistency. Worked great for me! Just add this to yast as an installation source, don't forget to refresh it from time to time since they do update it!
      packman's yast source
      Type: HTTP
      Server Name: packman.iu-bremen.de
      Directory Name: suse/9.(whatever)
    2. Re:A little more on the multimedia debacle by Pastis · · Score: 1

      - price has sometimes more to do with positioning than production costs + margin

      - I've bought DVDs, I've bought DVD reader (which comes with software for Windows). I don't accept the fact that I should pay 50$ more to watch them.

    3. Re:A little more on the multimedia debacle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that if a company wants to sell it's OS as an office product it will go all off in the DVD player and multimedia features. Thy are also heavy into pushing their Enterprise for servers, and see them using the "pro" and "presonal" OS's morea s a name recognition tool than anything. Besides, they make them freely available after a couple of months so the price is irrelevant if you can hold yourself in place.
      Sure it would be great to stop by Blockbuster before getting to work and watch a couple of movies until 5PM comes around. If I would have to change the PC's on my office I know I would strip them down to leaving XMMS only so that people can listen to their internet radio and such but nothing else aside from that.

      Besides that...I personnally don't want "the masses" using linux...I just want them to drool with their one button mouses and their filthy windows, Why, you ask?... If you get stupid questions from windows users how are you ever going to explain things on linux... and yes I am a filthy Capitalist and I love buggy products like most MS products because they keep me pretty busy. I wouldn't put that crap on my computers but if it where up to me I would spread that Sh*t like the plague.

      Besides Linux has been great because the community is very condensed with a lot of capable that contribute and "the cathedral and the bazaar" and all that. Once you make linux the mainstream thing...how do you know if the tables will turn..as it is the linux community is starting to divide and set up borders in things like licenses and such...I'd rather keep it "small"(in relative terms to other OS's) and tight than to create a mess.

  41. Re:Oblig. New Release Post by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    You've got to be kidding! I was using Potato when I was a kid, and my nick will tell you how long ago THAT was!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  42. Other Distros by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Some other commercial distros are pretty well thought out as well.

    Example: Xandros3.

    ( oh, and they offer a community edition you can actually download and install, not some 'ftp only' garbage )

    Mepis is also pretty far up there for 'well planned out'.

    Both debian based, which is a plus for the future.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  43. Software everyone can use is better. by jbn-o · · Score: 4, Informative

    In addition to being copyright infringement, these proprietary codecs don't work on non-i386-based platforms. One of the hallmarks of FLOSS is portability. I think it's a good thing that I can give someone a copy of an Ogg Vorbis file and not have to care what hardware they're using because I know it's likely that there's a program to play the audio file on their computer. Now, even portable digital audio players play Ogg Vorbis files, so people can hear high-quality compressed audio without being near their computer.

    This is part of the reason why I'm anxiously awaiting Dirac and why I'm reading the Theora spec. I want to be able to point to a complete and competitive FLOSS codecs which are genuinely useful for movies.

    We also ought to promote the use of these codecs and not be so eager to distribute copies of files encoded with proprietary or patent-encumbered codecs.

    1. Re:Software everyone can use is better. by mikefe · · Score: 1

      Then bring on the windows and OSX versions.

      Once you have the p2p networks using the FLOSS codecs, you're set.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    2. Re:Software everyone can use is better. by HogynCymraeg · · Score: 1

      What I don't get is why Suse CAN'T include the mp3 codec as standard. Is it becuase they don't want to pay the $0.50 licence fee per copy? If Suse can charge for the distro why not just pass that on to the customers who are willing to pay? Crippling your distro which you charge money for is a negative practice in my book. I can download free distros with all the codecs in (legal or not) right now. So quite why I can't get the same facilities on a PAID distro is beyond me.,,

    3. Re:Software everyone can use is better. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

      Nothing is preventing anyone from paying the one-time license fee for MP3 decoding. According to mp3licensing.com this one-time license fee is "US$ 50 000.00 - US$ 60 000.00". But there are some problems with that plan:

      • This license fee only covers MP3 decoding, not MP3 encoding. Nowadays people want to make compressed audio files, not just play them. At best, this only covers half of what users want to do.
      • The license fee is potentially incompatible with free software. It's possible that the license one pays for states that it does not apply to software which is licensed to share and modify. I don't know if this is the case, I've never read the license text for the one-time paid up MP3 decoder license, but it would be within the patent holder's power to do such a thing. Fraunhofer could decide to simply not license any free software distributor for an MP3 decoder license. Either would be a simple and effective showstopper for any free software MP3 player.
      • Eventually, the patents covering MP3 will expire everywhere in the world. At this point, you'll probably see MP3 encoders and decoders popping up in all free software and open source OSes. Ogg Vorbis will still be technically superior. Thus, the more time that passes, the more expensive any one-time license fee becomes because this fee grants one legal permission to do something one can do now (with better quality and tagging information) for no license fee. Paying this much money for something we don't strictly need is hard to justify to investors and small businesses.

      That's a lot of money for a free software project to raise or justify paying just to cave in to popularity. And the money would be paid to underscore something that should not exist in the first place (software patents) and would give users no reason to investigate using something we should be using instead (Ogg Vorbis).

  44. Torrent Available by Quash · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a torrent for SuSE 9.3. Go swarm happy!

  45. Novell vs. SUSE = GNOME vs. KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, let me get this straight:

    SUSE's default desktop is KDE.
    Novel Linux Desktop's defualt desktop is GNOME.

    How is it a good thing for interoperability and consistency to for the same company to be putting out two desktop products that are fundamentally different? How can they have any hope of market penetration when they're pulling in two directions at once?

    1. Re:Novell vs. SUSE = GNOME vs. KDE by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Novell Linux Desktop doesn't have a default desktop. It explicitly asks you whether you want Gnome or KDE during the install.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Novell vs. SUSE = GNOME vs. KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gnome used to be the default for Novell.
      KDE used to be the default for SuSE Linux.
    3. Re:Novell vs. SUSE = GNOME vs. KDE by askegg · · Score: 1

      It's about choice which increases market penetration.

      --
      I don't make predictions, and I never will.
  46. Re:Torrent Available for SuSE 9.3 by Quash · · Score: 1

    Woops. The link would have helped! Sorry. http://www.knetdome.com/bt/?torrent=suse93

  47. what about people without DVD? by protomala · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't have money to pay for a DVD recorder drive, or even a reader, I just have this nice CD-RW 52X from LG and I'm happy with it. So how can I install suse 9.3 by downloading cd isos to burn? (no ftp install, thanks). I supose I'll have to wait it to appear on torrent sites or emule?

    1. Re:what about people without DVD? by Kesha · · Score: 1

      You'll either have to find someone nearby who would be willing to let you borrow their SuSE 9.3 CDs, or you'll have to order the distribution yourself (not cheap). Your other option is to wait for the FTP release (usually happens half way between releases) and download the DVD iso, mount it, extract it to somewhere on the harddrive and try to install from that (what a pain). Forget about CD isos - SuSE doesn't make those. This option is still better than compiling from source RPMS.

      So, if you want to try SuSE, your best bet is to find a friend that owns a copy. Otherwise be ready to spend anywhere between $60 (student or update version) to $100 (regular). It might be cheaper to by a DVD burner at this price point, at least it won't be obsolete 6 months later.

      Paul.

    2. Re:what about people without DVD? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Or you could just get the CD version from the torrent, which is already available. Paul here apparently didn't bother to check to see if what he was saying was actually true or not.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    3. Re:what about people without DVD? by Kesha · · Score: 1

      It's not a full version, you won't get the full SuSE experience for a LiveCD. In particular you won't experience YaST in its full glory. Downloading a live CD is a waste of time and bandwidth, better spent on knoppix.

    4. Re:what about people without DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure you can download the directory when they offer it for 9.3 to some other computer and select a nfs install. Not really different than a ftp install.

      Also isn't there a way to update using yast? I tried it to update from 9.1 to 9.2. Since it told me something like 458 errors needed to be looked at I thought I would wait for a 9.3 ftp install and just change the whole system while I was at it.

      Dunno why they offer a 9.3 ftp mini cd yet the ftp servers don't have the (xml?) correct files yet.

  48. Why screenshots? by billcopc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't keep up with every single distro (I just do servers), but what's the point in showing screenshots ? Every distro looks more or less the same because it's always a rehash of the same software.. different package managers, different default background images, different color schemes during INIT.. that's pretty much it.

    What do screenshots mean in such a scenario ? I know I'm being overly critical but any default X configuration tends to look like 1994 nostalgia. Why can't we style KDE to look like Panther or something ? Always that "blah" blocky gray bar nagging at my subconscious. No shadows/depth, no perception of interactivity. Yes I know I'm being overly artsy but if I'm looking at a GUI that's slowing me down vs the command line, that GUI had better make up for its inefficacies by being intoxicatingly sexy and curvy.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Why screenshots? by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Stop making sense and move along.

      I too think screenshots don't do anything. How about a review of performance for the new apps rather than a change of the color of the title bar to the application?

      --
      Quality Hosting e3 Servers
    2. Re:Why screenshots? by Craig+Nagy · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! Screen shots for the latest distribution are a complete waste of time. "Yeah! Open Office in KDE!" woohoo. Maybe a few screenshots of custom tools would be ok.

      I don't think it would be too hard for a distro to, for example, include gdesklets by default and throw in some fancy application launcher or something of the sort. At least it wouldn't be just a plain KDE or Gnome desktop again.

    3. Re:Why screenshots? by iwan-nl · · Score: 1

      I agree, the screenshots add nothing. If you want a more artsy desktop you can go here or here. If you want a faster, cleaner desktop, I'd suggest you take a look over here.

      --
      I'm trying to improve my English. Please correct me on any spelling/grammar errors in this post.
    4. Re:Why screenshots? by Excelsior · · Score: 1

      Why screenshots? ... What do screenshots mean in such a scenario ? I know I'm being overly critical but any default X configuration tends to look like 1994 nostalgia.

      How would you know it still looks that way if it weren't for the screenshots? Would you rather have to install every distro in the hopes that it looks sexy, only to be pissed off at the time and effort required to find out it looks the same?

      It takes someone with a capable system, the correct graphic acceleration drivers installed, X.org with xcompmgr shadows (or a window manager AND gui toolkit that supports the extensions), a pimp-looking WM and gui toolkit skin, a pimp-looking icon theme, and gdesklets (or equivalent) to even approach the OSX sexiness.

      Apple's benefit is that they know most of their systems can support sexy. If Suse were to release the desktop you want, every old-school Linux geek with a 10 year old computer would make more noise than 77 Olds Cutlass with a squeaky fan belt.

      Even today, those same people argue that GTK+ 2 is too fat - a three year old toolkit. It's a wonder Linux desktops make any progress at all.

    5. Re:Why screenshots? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      The beauty of linux is that you can make it into whatever you want. If the old-school Linux geeks don't want the funky OpenGL smorgasbord WM they can just stick to XFCE or BlackBox. It's all about choice.

      And I choose to put funky graphics on my 2500$ space heater.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    6. Re:Why screenshots? by Excelsior · · Score: 1

      Interesting you mention XFCE as a light option - I recently noticed it is one of the first window managers to roll turn on drop shadows when running under X.org (meaning, you don't need xcompmgr for drop shadows under XFCE). Certainly, other WM will follow, but its interesting that a WM everyone describes as "light" is one of the first.

  49. Re:Removed packages? by zecg · · Score: 1

    Ubuntu is Debian with 'less software', dick.

    Well, I think they should have kept all of Debian's dick in Ubuntu.

    --
    .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
  50. Re:Multimedia--BS by damiam · · Score: 1
    You actually bought Codeweavers to run MPlayer?

    The parent said "I actually bought Codeweavers and have installed mplayer," not "I bought Codeweavers to install mplayer." Codeweavers can do stuff that mplayer can't, and vice versa, so it's perfectly logical to install both of them if you're looking for an ideal multimedia experience.

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  51. Survey suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which will release first?
    ( ) Debian "sarge"
    ( ) Microsoft Windows "Longhorn"
    ( ) Duke Nukem Forever
    ( ) CmdrTaco's breasts

  52. Re:Multimedia--BS by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    I'm doing fine without buying anything and he had no idea what he's talking about. And it definitely sounds like he's running MPlayer under Codeweavers since the Win32 port is the only version of MPlayer I know of that has problems with codecs. My multimedia experience on Suse has no problems and the parent poster is spreading FUD. Hell, I even told the guy how to do install what he needed!

  53. SUSE never boots! by bebopredux · · Score: 1

    I have tried SUSE countless times. DL'ed the last Live DVD and same problem.....it will not boot! No command line..doesn't get to that point. I know others have had problems with SUSE's distro doing the same thing. Have they fixed this problem on latest Live DVD? P1.7/512/ATI Radeon 9600 AIW

  54. Re:Torrent Available for SuSE 9.3 by x_codingmonkey_x · · Score: 0
  55. Suse 9.3 Pro BUSTED MY PRINTER! by oritpro · · Score: 0

    During the installation phase, test print. Went to cancel the job because it was taking too long and the head slammed against the stop so hard the printer actually jumped over to a new spot on my desk. The noise it made was so loud it made me jump!

    I am a huge Linux fan but this is inexcusable. Had to throw my Lexmark Z42 into the trash.

  56. Left Out by Dread+Pirate+Shanks · · Score: 1

    Where's the x86_64 version? SuSE seems to have an iso for every other architecture but mine. Guess I'll just keep waiting...

    1. Re:Left Out by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      If you want the LiveDVD. Looks like everyone will have to wait for the traditional network installation CDs, though.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
  57. Debian by Princess+Tarja · · Score: 3, Funny

    Websters Dictionary: "Debian" Once a Mainstay in linux distributions and somewhat innovative in package mangagement with "apt get" it fell into
    stagnation no doubt helped in part by it's so called "Debian Social Contract" and painfully slow release schedule. In later days it was surpassed by other more up to date distributions with other package systems with more flexibility and power.Debian R.I.P

    --
    Step out of the box and enjoy life
  58. I just upgraded SuSE by AaronW · · Score: 1

    I just upgraded to SuSE 9.3 and all I can say is so far everything is working smoothly and seems stable. It comes with the 2.6.11 kernel with some nice add-ons like subfs. My setup is not typical, either.

    This upgrade was actually one of the smoothest SuSE upgrades I've done.

    -Aaron

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    1. Re:I just upgraded SuSE by protomala · · Score: 1

      How did you upgraded, using cds isos, ftp, dvd?

    2. Re:I just upgraded SuSE by AaronW · · Score: 1

      I upgraded using the DVD.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  59. Please actually READ my post - YOU'RE WRONG by spineboy · · Score: 1
    I said I bought Codeweaver AND installed mplayer. I did not say I used Codeweaver to install mplayer.

    Get your facts straight before you jump all over some one.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Please actually READ my post - YOU'RE WRONG by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 0, Troll

      Try reading my post or searching Google before you post crap like you did. Multimedia is not hard in Suse and I just held your hand and showed you how.

    2. Re:Please actually READ my post - YOU'RE WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get your facts straight

      I believe all the facts he had were straight. Coming upon your sentence (bellow) I too thought you bought cw for mplayer.

      I actually bought COdeweavers and have installed mplayer.

      This is quite a funky thought as presented and, while not incorrect, you surely must be able to see his pov.

      In any case he provided helpful text/links and compared to the average slashdotter was quite a gentleman.

      Please don't jump on someone because you didn't express yourself clearly.

    3. Re:Please actually READ my post - YOU'RE WRONG by Ahkorishaan · · Score: 1

      Someone please mod this a$$hat down...

      --
      Please, try not to sound so stupid...
  60. SuSE has it (with packman help)-dvd ripping, etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just grab all the illegal(in some countries) multimedia stuff from the packman website and you are all set.

    In my opinion all illegal(in some countries) multimedia stuff works better with SuSE than Mandrake, that is packman packages are better than the Penguin Liberation Front packages.(I tried them both)

    I've been ripping my dvd collection under suse since 2002, I think it is the best OS for dvd ripping, better than Windows. The highest transcoding speeds are under SuSE with kernel 2.4.x, for some reason transcoding is slower under kernels 2.6.x. My favorite distro for ripping and transcoding is suse 8.2. I have basic suse 8.2 installations in all my computers, in addition to more complete current suse distros. I use suse 8.2 only for dvd ripping and transcoding, I do everything else in the current suse distribution(now SuSE 9.2). I purchase every upgrade (twice a year), in order to support the company.

    And no, I dont share my dvd rips with anybody else. I like to put them on portable pocket firewire/USB2 drives and watch them with my laptop while traveling. I use a tiny MM20 sharp laptop which weighs only 0.9 kg and has no internal optical drive. DVD-s are too heavy, carrying them with you is not practical. I could squeeze 50-60 DVDS in a single 100GB pocket drive (as .ogm files) Just try to carry 60 DVD around, they weigh as much as 10 pocket drives and swaping them is very hard. During a recent visit in the USA, I bought 5 external pocket drives,100GB each (the boxes contain 100GB Seagate momentum laptop drives) for less than 800 Euros. Thanks God the US dollar is so weak, I hope it stays this way for the benefit of us, European geeks. On these drives I can put about 300 ripped and transcoded DVDs, which is about half of my DVD collection.

  61. Ooo Check out Slide 20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The screenshots for these releases are always so fucking embarassing. They either wrongly suggest that nothing new has happened 'under the hood' or they confirm it

  62. Re:Way to stay on the edge.. by joeljkp · · Score: 1

    The description is misleading. 9.3 includes Firefox 1.0.1. I would assume that 1.0.3 will be released as a security update.

    --
    WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
  63. Suse by dlichterman · · Score: 1

    I just tried the Suse 9.3 live eval, and I found one thing that was cool. My wireless card actually worked! I connected and was viewing /. and using GAIM in no time at all!!!! Now, if they could just make this work in everything lol. Oh, and sound didnt work. oh well

  64. Damn you! by Twisted64 · · Score: 1

    Now I can't read any paragraph that describes something as "polished" without thinking of a friend named Bielecki. You bastard!

    --
    Consciousness is a myth. Trust me.
  65. Doesn't work; As Usual.. by Fussen · · Score: 1

    So I download the 1.4 Gig image and run the boot.

    I watch the whole boot process as it finds varions VIA chipsets, ATA configurations and 3com network setups. 3 guesses what breaks the boot. If you guessed the VIDEO CARD failing to initialize give yourself a lollipop.

    It's not like I'm using anything crazy. I have an ATI Radeon 9000 with a Samsung 700NF capable of displaying 800x600@120Hz.

    This is really starting to bust my chops. Who will EVER switch from windows if they can't see the damn login screen.

    From here I'm heading to Novell's site to search their knowledge base, but this is not something I should be doing, especially on a LIVE CD.

  66. Linphone on SuSE 9.3 by tannhaus · · Score: 1

    Everyone is making a big deal about SuSE having linphone as a part of the distro. So, I installed SuSE 9.3 yesterday and selected to install linphone. Well, guess what? As soon as I start up linphone, the program pops up. If I type in something and press call or try to select preferences from the menu, linphone crashes.....every...single....time. I didn't get it to work even once.

    Why offer it as a package if it doesn't even remotely work with a clean install?

  67. Re:Way to stay on the edge.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it includes Firefox 1.0.1 (likely to be upgraded by online update to 1.0.3 anyway), OOo 2.0 Pre and Gimp 2.2.4.

  68. UGH. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    girl geek powr! hahaha

    How old are you?

  69. My GOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those Icons are HUGE!!!

  70. CAUTION: DO NOT UPGRADE SUSE by jcole · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just upgraded my Suse 9.2 (with external install sources) to Suse 9.3 and now it DOES NOT BOOT INTO X. I'm hacking away at it right now trying to figure this mess out.

    As usual, Debian (with external install sources) upgraded just fine to the latest.

    With "commercial" distros, WHY do I have to format my computer every single time?

    I know these community distros Gentoo, Debian, Slack, etc. are a bit more complex to install (except for maybe Ubuntu), but at least I don't have to go through these damn version upgrade nightmares.

    -Joe

    1. Re:CAUTION: DO NOT UPGRADE SUSE by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      Worked fine for me.

  71. theory always outweighs facts as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    give someone a copy of an Ogg Vorbis file and not have to care what hardware they're using because I know it's likely that there's a program to play the audio file

    There are many rehashed points, many grounded in reality and thus with merit. Since any informed decision relies on hearing as many "sides" as possible and then weighing them all in the end, it is important to note the extreme lethargy involved in OSS related to actual usage.

    Many people simply do not want (and in fact should NEVER need) to know about internal details when they simply want something "that just works." From my own observations, here are the categories of reasons as to why proprietary solutions win out over "open" solutions:

    1. the proprietary solution "just works" while the open solutions are cobbled together experiments not of production quality (read: not intended for real use as evidenced by the documentation (or lack thereof), architecture, design, compatability, etc.)
    2. the proprietary solution is backed by tools to make the integrator AND the end user's lives easier while as with #1, the open solution relies merely on the presence of its source as documentation
    3. the open solution is plagued by fragmentation that no FUD (which includes counter-FUD) can change

    In short, the questions to ask range from "how will the openness (or lack thereof) really effect me relative to loss of productivity fighting with substandard hackers experiments" and "who is the intended audience of this tool?"

    There are some really great projects (and products) out there regardless of their openness and licensing. I have found that instead of focusing on the license I will focus primarily on the effectiveness and efficiency of the project and its output.

    Why should a plumber be required to know, much less actually construct and maintain, his truck, radio, phone, desk, accounting and billing system, mailing system, etc? His job is plumbing, and he must use proprietary tools and solutions that enable him to get to work then guess what the plumber will go for?