Slashdot Mirror


New Movies of Whirlwinds on Mars

FleaPlus writes "The Pasadena Star-News, APOD, and WPBF report on new movies of Martian whirlwinds, captured by Spirit rover inside Gusev Crater. These movies are the result of a new imaging technique developed after the initial spotting of whirlwinds by Spirit last month. Here is the first and second video. According to a rover team member, 'This is the best look we've ever gotten of the wind effects on the martian surface as they are happening.'"

153 comments

  1. Animated GIFs, not movies... by garcia · · Score: 5, Informative

    Direct links to the animated GIFs are here:

    PIA07861.gif and PIA07863.gif.

    To those of you that don't want to download 3MB of animated GIFs for a 2 second view of a whirlwind on Mars let me sum it up for you. Dust, a small hill, and what appears to be a UFO dancing around on the screen.

    For those of you that are conspiracy theorists... This could be a UFO sighting! It also could have been made in any one of the deserts in the USA (or abroad!) ;-)

    1. Re:Animated GIFs, not movies... by jdray · · Score: 1

      It's funny how the more earthlike features we find on Mars, the more habitable it seems to become. That is, until you stop to realize that the atmosphere is still really thin, almost vacuum, and comprised of nothing we can breathe.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    2. Re:Animated GIFs, not movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.

    3. Re:Animated GIFs, not movies... by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I saw this on Fark a few days ago. The quality is good, if a bit choppy.

      FYI - this is further evidence of the process by which the rover's solar panels are regularly cleaned (thus extending the mission's life).

    4. Re:Animated GIFs, not movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mars landing is a hoax! ;)

    5. Re:Animated GIFs, not movies... by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 3, Funny
      This could be a UFO sighting!

      Actually it looks more like a piece of Beagle

    6. Re:Animated GIFs, not movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took you that long to figure it out? Yeah, we're dropping robots on Mars, covered in airbags. Suuuree... Not to mention that every picture looks like they cut down the plants in a couple acres of Montana, snapped pictures, and shifted the color balance. ;)

    7. Re:Animated GIFs, not movies... by jafac · · Score: 1

      . . .or the whole thing could be computer-generated, like the moon-landings.

      (this is why CPU speeds doubled every 18-months, because the "known" industry, state-of-the-art, had to catch up quickly (over 20 years) to the CPU technology the greys gave us back in 1962.)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    8. Re:Animated GIFs, not movies... by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1
      t's funny how the more earthlike features we find on Mars, the more habitable it seems to become. That is, until you stop to realize that the atmosphere is still really thin, almost vacuum, and comprised of nothing we can breathe.

      Well how unihabitable is Mars anyway? hmm lets see... the ambient atmospheric pressure on Mt. Everest here on Earth can be 140-220 millibars and people climb that thing maybe with the assistance of a little bit of oxygen. (No space suit). Well on Mars... hmm according to NASA says according to viking there was an AVERAGE pressure of about 8 millibars. But on a warm day in some of the deepest (sun exposed) valleys, it may be possible to get up to 85 millibars (we really don't know).

      FYI normal pressure on Earth is supposed to be 1 bar (1000 millibars)

      As for temperature, it is possible that on a warm day on the equator during Mars's Aphelion could go as high as 60`F... well atleast according to pathfinder it has far as 20`F. It seems that soil temperatures have been recorded as high as 81`F. (Viking)

      Oxygen in Mars's atmosphere is 0.13%. But Carbon Dioxide is 95%.

      It may be possible to have enough Oxygen to brethe on a warm day in a deep valley during Mars's Aphelion that if you just lied down and didn't try to move or talk that you'd live breathing 60`F Air on 85`F Soil and a very thin 85 millibar atmosphere......

      EXCEPT

      Even if all that were possible you'd still die from Carbon Dioxide Poisoning. At high concentrations, CO2 imparts an acidic taste in the mouth as it dissolves in mucosal water to form carbonic acid. You would probably experience immediate hypoxia or anoxia. Even on Earth, assphyxiation can also occur at high altitudes, where reduced atmospheric pressures lead to reduced partial pressures of oxygen. To give you an idea of what it'd feel like, next time you go to a quickie mart and get a coke or pepsi (fountain drink) immediately put it under your nose and breathe in... you will find out you don't very much like such high concentrations of CO2.

      We really need to replace the existing carbon dioxide on mars with something else or we will never be able to live there.

    9. Re:Animated GIFs, not movies... by jdray · · Score: 2, Insightful
      assphyxiation ???

      I don't want to know, really I don't.

      But seriously, yes, at the bottom of Valles Marineris at noon on a summer's day, you could probably stand the weather if you had on a good parka and a breathing mask. Of course, then there's the radiation that would give any exposed skin a serious sunburn in just a few minutes; at least that's the way I understand it.

      I suspect you understood that I was just saying that, due to our media exposure to a very familiar looking place, we're slowly getting indoctrinated to the idea of living on Mars. It's kind of neat, really. We look at pictures of Venus and think we'd never want to go near such a hellish place. Mars, on the other hand, looks more inviting than some places on Earth.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    10. Re:Animated GIFs, not movies... by songofthephoenix · · Score: 1
      This could be a UFO sighting!

      Actually it's thousands of little flesh eating ants scouring across the Martian fields.

  2. Another NASA Cover-Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly this effect is caused by the recoil of an Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator

    1. Re:Another NASA Cover-Up! by eobanb · · Score: 1

      Brace yourself for immediate disintegration.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:Another NASA Cover-Up! by idontgno · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!"

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:Another NASA Cover-Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when it disintegrates, it disintegrates. < pulls trigger >. Well, what do you know... It... disintegrated...

    4. Re:Another NASA Cover-Up! by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      Yes, but there's no kaboom. There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering kaboom.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    5. Re:Another NASA Cover-Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering kaboom

      Of course there wasn't. It's on Mars...

    6. Re:Another NASA Cover-Up! by Himring · · Score: 1

      It's actually a "PU-36" space modulator, but commonly mistaken as "Q-36."

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  3. Winds.. by grazzy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Could anyone care to explain how winds are started if there is no to little atmosphere? Does this for instance imply that there is water in the air on mars?

    1. Re:Winds.. by TheKidWho · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is atmosphere on mars, it's about 100times less then that of the earth at "sea level", but it is still significant. And there is H2O in Mar's Atmosphere, where do you think those melting ice caps go in the martian summer =)

      http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~soper/Mars/atmosphere.h tm l

    2. Re:Winds.. by Veinor · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not a meteorologist, but: I think that the sun heats the atmosphere differently, thus creating what is known as a katabatic (I think that's what it's called) wind. Also, the atmosphere does not move precisely in synch with the rotation of mars, so you get some turbulence

    3. Re:Winds.. by baadger · · Score: 1

      Additionally the wins may not be as strong, but the force of gravity is significantly weaker.

    4. Re:Winds.. by Rei · · Score: 1

      If there's *any* atmosphere, there can be wind. Winds on mars tend to be very high speed - hurricane strength is common - but because of the low pressure, it's like a faint breeze on Earth.

      Of course, all I could picture when I read this article headline was a rover surrounded by a bright technocolar landscape with fantastical beings, and Scott O'Keefe standing nearby saying "Spirit, I don't think we're in Gusev Crater anymore!". Perhaps a witch under one wheel for good measure.

      --
      Are there any deer in the theater tonight? Get 'em up against the wall.
    5. Re:Winds.. by grazzy · · Score: 1

      No idea, I just wanna know how those winds are starting. Doesnt something have to "push" them?

    6. Re:Winds.. by Ironsides · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No idea, I just wanna know how those winds are starting. Doesnt something have to "push" them?

      Winds on mars occur for the same reason as wind on earth. Pretty much the sun heats up one area more than another and causes a pressure differential. Just because there is a lot less atmosphere on mars doesn't mean it occurs for a different reason.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    7. Re:Winds.. by FrankSchwab · · Score: 3, Informative

      No need for winds to start up a dust devil; they'll kick off on a perfectly calm day. What happens is that the sun heats the ground. The ground heats the air just above it. The Hot air is less dense than cold air above it, and so it tries to rise through the cold air. Some pushing and shoving goes on, because the cold air doesn't really want to move out of the way, meanwhile more air is getting heated by the ground. Eventually, the hot air finds a weak spot in the obstinate cold air and coalesces into a coherent stream which rushes upward. It sucks in hot air from the ground all around the stream; most times, due to terrain effects or random noise, the incoming air will start a rotation of the column of rising air, and Bingo! you've got a dust devil. /frank

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    8. Re:Winds.. by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean, in the same way that Boreas, God of the North Wind, causes winter gales hear on Earth - by "pushing"? :)

      --
      Are there any deer in the theater tonight? Get 'em up against the wall.
    9. Re:Winds.. by Naikrovek · · Score: 4, Informative

      The sun pushes them. when one side of the planet is hot, and the other is cold, the hot air tries to move into the cold air. hot air expands, and pushes itself into neighboring areas.

      some locations on mars are different colors, so the sun gets converted to heat differently in different areas. eventually you get a lot of wind that seems to come from nowhere, because of turbulence. geography and other packets of high and low pressure cause turbulence.

      so your answer to what pushes the wind on mars is the same thing that pushes the wind on the Earth. Sunlight.

    10. Re:Winds.. by Relic+of+the+Future · · Score: 1

      The ice caps are almost entirely CO2.

      --
      Those who fail to understand communication protocols, are doomed to repeat them over port 80.
    11. Re:Winds.. by MooseByte · · Score: 3, Informative

      "The sun pushes them. when one side of the planet is hot, and the other is cold, the hot air tries to move into the cold air. hot air expands, and pushes itself into neighboring areas."

      I think it's more a matter of warmer "air" (generic atmospheric gases) wanting to rise, and colder air wanting to sink. You get a convection thing going.

      For a good effect here on earth, cooler evening winds coming off of mountains and down canyons is a good example. Large thunderstorms as well - rising warm air slurps up a bunch of surrounding ground air with it (winds radially toward center of buildup) then when it all cools high in the atmosphere it cuts loose and the cold air rapidly sinks back toward the ground, creating strong winds radially away from the storm's center.

    12. Re:Winds.. by loganjw · · Score: 1

      Yes, wind is merely a heat exhange.

    13. Re:Winds.. by uberdave · · Score: 1

      You mean that wind isn't caused by trees and grass waving back and forth?

  4. Can't Wait by TheKidWho · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Until they get the next Mars Rover there that's going to be powered by a RTG (http://www.nuclearspace.com/a_2009_Rover.htm)!!

    If it ends up working anywhere near as well as the current rovers, it might still be operational when astronauts land on Mars in 2020(Im trying as hard as possible to be involved in this project once I get out of college)

    1. Re:Can't Wait by Rei · · Score: 1

      The Mars Science Laboratory looks wonderful :) Not will it be large (SUV-sized) and have a sizable power supply, but its tools look wonderful. It will be able to take small core samples or pick up rocks, run them through a crusher, and deliver it to whatever internal experiments it chooses; the internal experiments should be able to tell not only what makes up the rock, but perform microscopy, determine the precise mineral structure and perhaps even do some isotopic analysis (i.e., we may be able to get some dates or find suspicious life-suggesting isotopic ratios).

      My favorite tool that I read about is a powerful onboard laser. Through the same telescope that they use to spot targets, they will fire the laser to burn off a spot around a millimeter in diameter, destroying outer coatings and making the rock luminesce for spectral analysis from even dozens of feet away.

      --
      Are there any deer in the theater tonight? Get 'em up against the wall.
    2. Re:Can't Wait by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Cue up the well-meaning, but technologically illiterate, protestors claiming that the RTG is too dangerous to launch...

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:Can't Wait by MagPulse · · Score: 1

      Why aren't they sending two this time? Are they confident since both Spirit and Opportunity were successful? Or is it because this rover is much bigger so it's too expensive to send two?

    4. Re:Can't Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't say I'm thrilled about Plutonium-238 whizzing around the upper atmosphere at high speed navigated by telemetry, does that make me a paranoid tree-hugger?

      It's much like a guy with a remote controlled car with a sandwich baggie full of paint driving around the living room from the kitchen; sure there probably won't be a mess, but if there is, well don't let mom find out...

    5. Re:Can't Wait by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Let me clarify: I didn't say you were a tree hugger, nor did I even imply that environmentalism is bad, or that environmentalists are technologically illiterate.

      SPECIFICALLY, I was speaking of people who protest the launch of RTG's. Environmentalism is good, VERY good, critical even. But, that doesn't mean that I won't point out that protesting an RTG launch is just boneheaded.

      Please don't read things that I didn't write.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  5. Planetay weather by thewiz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Interesting to see what the weather looks like on Mars. What I'd like to know is if weather.com is going to start posting forecasts for other planetary bodies anytime soon.

    Very nice to know that the dust devils are helping the rovers along. I wonder if we could get them to wash and wax the rovers as well.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    1. Re:Planetay weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking moron. I decided that even before I read your sig.

    2. Re:Planetay weather by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to know is if weather.com is going to start posting forecasts for other planetary bodies anytime soon.

      Maybe not weather.com, but spaceweather.com already does (for the sun, at least).

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    3. Re:Planetay weather by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but since we can't legally compete with private firms, weather data is available by subscription only.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    4. Re:Planetay weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Malin Space Science Systems (msss.com) used to do a periodic "Mars Weather Report" based upon Mars Global Surveyor data, but they no longer do.

    5. Re:Planetay weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends, hopefully GoDaddy will let them register weather.mars

  6. Blueberries by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This supports a wind erosion theory for the bluberries. I'd heard people say that the atmosphere is too thin to really erode them much; clearly, if it's strong enough to suspend dust in densitites like this, it's got enough force to erode/polish the pebbles to roundness.

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Blueberries by jte · · Score: 1

      Yes, also - geologic events on mars occur in a timescale is much greater than the earth's volatile and "rapid" changes - plenty of time for erosion in a thin atmosphere. Think hundreds of millions to a few billion years.

    2. Re:Blueberries by uniqueUser · · Score: 1

      Mars has an atomosphear pressure of about .147 psi

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    3. Re:Blueberries by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why is this marked so highly? The blueberries are clearly already round when embedded in their source rocks. They're formed the same way a number of types of rocks on Earth are: A hollow cavity is filled in by a different mineral than the surrounding rock (a water soluable mineral) which is harder than the surrounding rock; the surrounding rock erodes and leaves the filler mineral.

      --
      Are there any deer in the theater tonight? Get 'em up against the wall.
    4. Re:Blueberries by radtea · · Score: 1

      ...if it's strong enough to suspend dust in densitites like this...

      Densities like what? These are enhanced images.

      They've taken multiple frames, subtracted them to get images that are uniform except where something has moved/changed, increased the contrast in the subtracted images and added them back in to the originals. This is a good way of making things that change really stand out, but is not useful for even qualitative estimates of the dust density.

      In the original images you can barely see anything--the dust density is extremely small. It may still be sufficient to yield signifcant errosion over geological (areological?) timescales, though.

      --Tom

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    5. Re:Blueberries by pizzaman100 · · Score: 1
      Mars has an atomosphear pressure of about .147 psi

      References:

      Earth sea level = 14.7

      Death Valley, California = 15.0

      Denver, Colorado = 12.2

      Mexico City = 11.1

      Mount Everest = 4.3

  7. Slightly animated dirt more exciting than shuttle by selectspec · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Once again, a Lego Mindstorm on steroids proves more interesting than the space shuttle.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  8. A Mars movie? by OneBigWord · · Score: 4, Funny

    These movies are certainly better that Red Planet.

    1. Re:A Mars movie? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      that movie brings tears to my eyes =(

    2. Re:A Mars movie? by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 1

      Hey! I liked it. Until they started talking.

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    3. Re:A Mars movie? by Naikrovek · · Score: 1

      I saw that when it opened, and while I was walking out I heard a guy say "a sharp stick to the eye would have been better"

      He was right. That movie sucked.

    4. Re:A Mars movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Red Planet sucked, but Mission to Mars (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0183523/) was awesome!

    5. Re:A Mars movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer Total Recall.

  9. Is that Taz? by airship · · Score: 1

    Look real close. Isn't that the Tazmanian Devil in the center of that thing?

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  10. Scientific proof by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and in conclusion, this footage offers concrete proof that there are not martian dust devils, as my esteemed colleges suggest, but proof of Tasmain Martianius Spinnus maximus, or in laymas terms, Martian Tasmanian Devils.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  11. Mirror of GIFs by alienfluid · · Score: 4, Informative

    The page will almost certainly get /.d since the animated GIFs are over 1.5 MB each.

    Here's a mirror if that happens:
    Video 1
    Video 2
    Have fun!

    1. Re:Mirror of GIFs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think NASA has never been slashdotted... they almost have the record bandwidth from when the rovers landed on Mars, not only /.ers were on the site, but millions of other people too.

  12. The pictures are like Lost In Space by John+Seminal · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I had no idea there was wind on mars. That is kinda cool to think they have wind. If we built a enclosed research station, we could have wind generated power.

    I hope we get a research station on mars, even if it is unmanned. It will be a starting point for building more.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:The pictures are like Lost In Space by fk319 · · Score: 1

      With a atmosphere of 1% of earths, I would expect the energy in the wind would be also 1%

    2. Re:The pictures are like Lost In Space by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

      Uh, no. The particulate matter being moved there is incredibly light - because the atmosphere is so much thinner, the energy attainable with a surface area of turbine is proportionally less. Solar power is a much better idea.

    3. Re:The pictures are like Lost In Space by Rei · · Score: 1

      It's not quite that bad, as the energy in wind is proportional to the velocity squared, and we've clocked surface winds on mars easily moving at class-5 hurricane speeds. It works out to a light breeze here on Earth. :)

      --
      Are there any deer in the theater tonight? Get 'em up against the wall.
  13. pffft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yank.. who cares..

  14. Re:Slightly animated dirt more exciting than shutt by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
    Once again, a Lego Mindstorm on steroids proves more interesting than the space shuttle.

    Comments like this have no place on Slashdot, where we are supposed to mindlessly cheer for the manned space program, regardless of how much it may cost, or how little we may get back.

  15. Two in one? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1, Informative

    Unless I'm mistaken, if you look closely along the top, right edge of the images in the first link you can see another dust devil. It appears near the horizon edge and meets the edge of the overall image right before the main dust devil appears.

    Unless it's some kind of artifact from the processing it looks like NASA got a two-for-one.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Two in one? by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 1

      No, you're right. I suspect that's why they have those otherwise blank-appearing frames at the beginning of the clip instead of just showing the few frames with the large dust devil in the foreground.

      --

      ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
    2. Re:Two in one? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      I want to know how the fuck this comment is offtopic. It clearly is not.

      Shitfaced mods. Quit injecting your personal crap on very ontopic comments.

      This is exactly why I metamoderate all comments marked as Redundant as Unfair.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    3. Re:Two in one? by !emus · · Score: 0

      I agree 100%. That comment is about as ontopic as you can get. I noticed the "bonus" devil as well, and was going to mention it if nobody else did. So, is there any other explanation for that moving speck?

      --
      "It's hard to bargle nawdle zouss
      With all these marbles in my mouth
      "
  16. Gosh, what next? by RealProgrammer · · Score: 5, Funny

    The properties of fluids are the same on Earth and Mars.

    Man, what if all of physics works the same there? Just think of the number of stories.

    "Scientist discovers light on Mars!"

    "Stuff falls down when you drop it on Mars!"

    "On Mars, stuff stays where you put it!"

    "On Mars, a rock keeps moving if you kick it!"

    "Mars displays friction!"

    "On Mars, energy tends to move from stuff with more to stuff with less!"

    This didn't start out as a Troll, sorry. I'm just tired of Martian News of the obvious.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Gosh, what next? by icejai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This might tickle your brain a bit.

      On earth, the day is blue and the sun sets red.

      On mars, it's the other way around: The day is red and the sunsets are blue.

      Weird huh?

    2. Re:Gosh, what next? by plastic_grass · · Score: 1

      I think we finally found our replacement to "In Soviet Russia..."

    3. Re:Gosh, what next? by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 1

      This might tickle your brain a bit.

      Nope. Didn't tickle my brain. I shit myself though.

      IronChefMorimoto

    4. Re:Gosh, what next? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gosh, what next? The properties of fluids are the same on Earth and Mars.

      I know you weren't really trolling, but seriously you need to reexamine your understanding of the scientific process.

      The fact that there are dustdevils on mars isn't new - the scientists I worked with on MER had concluded that there were plenty nearby from satalite imagery (they seem to be formed often in craters and leave trails, as seen in some unreleased satalite imagery). We've had prior observations of effects of dust devils, as described in this paper, and even a few other movies (see bottom of page), but this is our first look *UP CLOSE*. (also of note is this satellite image from the Mars Global Surveyer)

      The point here is not "we discovered dustdevils on mars, look pretty picture," the point is that the assumption that physics works the same on mars allows us to properly interpret this *much* better imagery of dust devils and come up with a lot of useful information about the atmosphere, wind speeds, grain size, etc.

      I think this attitude of "gee whiz this isn't new" is why a lot of good science doesn't get funded these days. Just because something is "obvious" doesn't make it right, and just because an experiment or observation is not novel does not mean we have nothing to learn from it!

    5. Re:Gosh, what next? by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1
      • ... just because an experiment or observation is not novel does not mean we have nothing to learn from it!

      Atmospheric conditions on Mars are interesting, and certainly worth studying in their own right. While we can predict in software the way it ought to work given lower gravity, different air composition, cold, etc., studying it for real is something else.

      My complaint is with the hype over all things Martian, and I decided to have some fun with it.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    6. Re:Gosh, what next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the color calibration messup/distortion discussion that's been described here before, the red component of the Martian sky is almost entirely because and for several days after dust-storms, it has the same blue color our sky does the rest of the time.

  17. if you want a better look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply turn on the martian weather channel

  18. What kind of analysis will scientists do with this by joshtimmons · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm curious to know how much effort/man hours is put into studying this kind of phenomena. Do NASA folks just say "That's cool, look at that." like I do, or do they assign a team to spend a month trying to extrapolate airspeed, volume, spin direction, lifespan, and other attributes that I can't even think of?

    I guess I mean: does this really mean anything important to a scientist, or is it just eyecandy for the taxpayers?

  19. Venus by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Here is a comparison of the atmospheric composition of Earth and Venus and Mars. I list the number of molecules per m2 of surface area of the planet in each planet's atmosphere relative to the total number of molecules per m2 in Earth's atmosphere

    xxx Earth xx Venus xx Mars
    O2 xx 0.20 xx 0.001 xx 10^-7
    CO2 xx 0.0003 xx 64 xx 0.009
    H2O xx ~ 0.02 xx ~ 0.01 xx ~10-6

    Am I reading this right, we have more of an atmosphere on Venus than mars? Why don't we go search that planet. If there a greater chance to find evidence of life there? Why deal with a "dead" planet when we have another planet with oxygen and carbon dioxide. Who knows, maybe we can give Venus CPR. We start with a small station with plants. We build a mini enclosed ecosystem. Then we build another, and another.

    I know, we might as well try it in a desert first, but I bet it can be done.

    The CO2 number really sticks out. Plants could convert that to oxygen.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Venus by digidave · · Score: 1

      Venus' thick atmosphere has created a runaway greenhouse effect. Temperatures can reach 900 C and I suspect there is probably not enough sunlight reaching the surface to grow plants.

      NASA landed a probe there many years ago. You can still find the surface pics on their web site. Guess what? It looks like Mars :)

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    2. Re:Venus by Rei · · Score: 1

      I assume you're kidding or trolling... right? I mean, unless you like the notion of living under 80 atmospheres of pressure at temperatures hot enough to melt gold...

      --
      Are there any deer in the theater tonight? Get 'em up against the wall.
    3. Re:Venus by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Because the runaway greenhouse effect on Venus has heated the surface temperature to a toasty 758 K (900 F). It's not just the atmosphere. There is very likely no life on the surface at that temperature. There might well be life above the lowest cloud layer. To give Venus CPR we would need to reverse the runaway greenhouse effect. Oh it also rains sulphuric acid there, hindering your exploration efforts

    4. Re:Venus by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Why don't we go search that planet. If there a greater chance to find evidence of life there? Why deal with a "dead" planet when we have another planet with oxygen and carbon dioxide.

      The atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is 90 times that of Earth's. It's like being under 1000 meters of water. Furthermore, the surface temperature is hot enough to melt lead, and clouds of sulfuric acid cover the surface.

      In other words, space probes don't last very long on Venus. Thus, it's better to go places where you can actually spend time getting data.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    5. Re:Venus by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      I assume you're kidding or trolling... right? I mean, unless you like the notion of living under 80 atmospheres of pressure at temperatures hot enough to melt gold...

      We have built submarines that can withstand great pressure diving to the depths of the sea. We have built research stations in the antartic that only can be manned for a couple months a year because of the cold, but we built them. We built space ships, space stations.

      If we wanted to, every problem you describe is a challenge that someone will find an anwser to. Just because it is hard does not mean it can't be done. For example, you mention the high temprature. I am sure we could think of substances which would resist melting at that temprature for a hull. We would then need some good insulation. We know how heat is conducted, so we would have to limit the convection, we would have to insulate. It is possible. Then we need to figure out how to keep the hull from buckling.

      All these leaps in knowledge would be very helpful. Say we decide to build space ships that can travel far away. To the edges of our solar system. Would you feel safer on the space ship if you knew, we have an improved hull, we have technology x and y.

      This is what I love about science. It is almost like science fiction, and we are finding ways to make it real. It gives us hope that there is more to life.

      I would ask you one question. What was the atmosphere like on earth when life first formed. Wasn't it very toxic, to the point where we would not be able to live back then. I think we might learn something on Venus. Maybe it is like a time capsul. I dunno, but I would like to find out.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    6. Re:Venus by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      Why don't we go search that planet. If there a greater chance to find evidence of life there? Why deal with a "dead" planet when we have another planet with oxygen and carbon dioxide.

      The atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is 90 times that of Earth's. It's like being under 1000 meters of water. Furthermore, the surface temperature is hot enough to melt lead, and clouds of sulfuric acid cover the surface.

      In other words, space probes don't last very long on Venus. Thus, it's better to go places where you can actually spend time getting data.

      Then lets build a space ship that can orbit Venus? Would we learn more that way than just using telescopes?

      I mentioned this elsewhere, but since you bring it up I'll ask again. If the pressure is like being under 1000 meters of water, don't we have submirines that can withstand that? And if it is so hot, don't we have some steel or somekind of substance which would not melt? What are our subs made out of? I take it the hull can't withstand that temprature, but can it be changed in some way, even if for a probe that could last longer.

      I am a dreamer when it comes to space exploration. I wish we could have more probes, more space ships that traveled farther.

      If NASA had a program where they built a great new space ship that would travel to alpha centuri and back, and we were told it would take more than our lifetime, I would go. Have a family on the ship. Make it there, let the next generation study it. Eventually they would come back to earth. We would learn so much.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    7. Re:Venus by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I think the Russians managed to send a couple of probes to Venus back in the 70s or 80s. I think they lasted long enough to send back one or two panaramic shots before being destroyed.

      If you want to do any sort of extended stay on Venus you're going to have to either terraform the planet or live in floating cities near the top of the atmosphere. Plus: Plants may like the CO2, but the other compounds in the atmosphere are rather toxic.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    8. Re:Venus by pedroloco · · Score: 1

      Actually, while one of the Pioneer Venus atmospheric probes did survive its impact with Venus's surface, it had no cameras. All the landing site images we've seen of Venus's surface came from Soviet Venera landers.

    9. Re:Venus by Rei · · Score: 1

      Um, no. Please, present a realistic scenario - system electronics, for example, that will work at those temperatures. What do you propose to do about power to not only run electronics, but also run the bloody-huge heat pumps to keep the thing cooler than, say, the melting point of gold? RTGs work by *differentials* in temperature, and even in good conditions couldn't even begin to give that much power.

      Insulation is not the problem - insulation only delays heat flow. You have to be able to pump heat out, and pump out an incredible amount.

      We've landed probes on Venus. They've all been throwaway-designs, designed to only last minutes to hours, because there's no way to sustain any significant amount of operation on the surface.

      The problem is that this *is* science, not science fiction, that we're talking about.

      What was the atmosphere of Earth like when it was formed? Not too different from today, minus the oxygen, and with more free methane and H2. Just perfect for quite a few types of protolife. Not 80 atmospheres, and not hot enough to melt gold - nowhere even close. It's a miracle that some life can live around the boiling point of water; Venus temperatures are just ridiculous - it's like expecting to find life in a volcano. Unless you know where we can find some Mycon, life isn't going to survive on Venus beyond the cloudtops (and even there, it doesn't work, as they lack phosphorus, which is essential to LAWKI). You'd have better luck seeding a gas giant.

      --
      Are there any deer in the theater tonight? Get 'em up against the wall.
    10. Re:Venus by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      If we wanted to, every problem you describe is a challenge that someone will find an anwser to. Just because it is hard does not mean it can't be done.

      To illustrate this problem, let's review a little history. When the Russians first decided to go to Venus, they built a test facility to test the Venus surface conditions of acidity, heat and pressure. Then they built a probe; the toughest strongest probe they could, and put it in the test chamber under what the probe would experience on Venus.

      The left the probe in the chamber for an hour, and opened the chamber. There was nothing left of the probe. Complete vapourization.

      The longest a probe has ever survived on the surface of Venus was about 20 minutes. Does this show you the magnitide of how difficult the problem of a human presence on Venus is? I'm not saying it can't be done, I'm just saying I wouldn't want to be the one constructing this extreme habitat.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    11. Re:Venus by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      The difference being that you are not lifting a submarine out of the earth's gravity well. As far Venus being a "time capsule," the surface of Venus has been scoured by rains of acid for millions of years. Very little has survived from the original formation of the solar system. The atmosphere in the early formation of the earth was nothing like the current atmosphere of venus. I would much rather seed the atmosphere with hyperthermophiles in an attempt to reverse the green house effect.

    12. Re:Venus by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the "toxic" issue is often overstated. Spectral analysis of Venus clearly reveals the H2SO4, but it is a very tiny portion of Venus's atmosphere, and is essentially absent near the surface - we see it because it's in the cloud tops. Also, another mistaken concept is that venus is completely dry - it actually has something like 1/6th the partial pressure of water that we have on Earth (it's just a tiny amount in comparison to all of those other gasses)

      The concept of terraforming Venus is a rather interesting proposition. For "any" life to survive you need to be able bring the temperature down on the surface (the cloudtops lack all of the minerals needed for life), but for humans to live there, you need to bring the pressure down dramatically (which would help with the temperature). Perhaps non-replicating buoyant robots/nanobots/chemicals produced on earth and seeded into the upper atmosphere of Venus could manage to use solar energy to precipitate out long carbon chains. I can't think of where to start on that engineering problem, though - it's huge.

      --
      Are there any deer in the theater tonight? Get 'em up against the wall.
    13. Re:Venus by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      The longest a probe has ever survived on the surface of Venus was about 20 minutes

      Incorrect, Venera-9 sent back telemetry for 50 minutes and Venera-10 did so for 45 minutes, as seen here.

    14. Re:Venus by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      Then lets build a space ship that can orbit Venus? Would we learn more that way than just using telescopes?

      Build an orbiter ?, thats a good idea maybe NASA should try that. And they could use radar to map the surface too.

    15. Re:Venus by pedroloco · · Score: 1

      Then lets build a space ship that can orbit Venus? Would we learn more that way than just using telescopes?

      You mean like Magellan?

    16. Re:Venus by rcw-work · · Score: 1
      Then lets build a space ship that can orbit Venus? Would we learn more that way than just using telescopes?

      We've done that.

      If the pressure is like being under 1000 meters of water, don't we have submirines that can withstand that?

      The pressure isn't such a big deal as long as there isn't a pressure differential. Humans can't deal with 90 bars of pressure, so we maintain a pressure differential when we go underwater. Unmanned probes don't necessarily need to maintain a pressure differential for all of their equipment.

      And if it is so hot, don't we have some steel or somekind of substance which would not melt?

      Ok, let's shoot a chunk of steel at Venus. It'll get pretty soft but it won't melt. What were you expecting that chunk of steel to do?!

      Probes usually contain circuitry, cameras, radios, etc. It's only a matter of time before they assume the temperature of Venus's surface. You wouldn't have the energy available to maintain your equipment in the equivalent of a cryogenic freezer. Making all of these things survive at Venus's surface temperature is quite a challenge.

      What are our subs made out of?

      Steel, typically, which isn't a good choice for containing sulfuric acid.

      Bottom line, Mars has allure that Venus doesn't, because it would be possible to colonize Mars. You'd never be able to live on Venus.

    17. Re:Venus by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Sounds like we just need a reeealy long straw and let Mars suck some of the atmoshpere out of Venus.

      Then we have two habitable planets!

    18. Re:Venus by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Then lets build a space ship that can orbit Venus?

      We did:

      • Venera 9 - Jun. 8, 1975
      • Venera 10 - Jun. 14, 1975
      • Pioneer Venus 1 - May 20, 1978
      • Venera 11 - Sep. 9, 1978
      • Venera 12 - Sep. 14, 1978
      • Venera 13 - Oct. 30, 1981
      • Venera 14 - Nov. 4, 1981
      • Venera 15 - Jun. 2, 1983
      • Venera 16 - Jun. 7, 1983
      • Magellan - May 4, 1989
      And if it is so hot, don't we have some steel or somekind of substance which would not melt?

      We sent landers to Venus and they lasted about an hour. That's the point, the landers don't last very long even when they are designed to.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    19. Re:Venus by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "It's a miracle that some life can live around the boiling point of water; Venus temperatures are just ridiculous - it's like expecting to find life in a volcano."

      But there ARE bacteria in volcanos... try googling "bacteria in volcano" and looking at some of the top 10 results.

    20. Re:Venus by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      See kids? This is what happens when you sleep through science class.

      The temperature on the surface of Venus is 464C, or 136.5 degrees Celcius higher than the melting point of lead (327.5 C).

      If you thought that landing on Mars was tough, try landing on a planet where the rocks are the consistency of ice cream and your electronics bake like cinnamon rolls.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    21. Re:Venus by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's much to learn about venus. Rocks, sulphuric acid, hot. Yes, submarines go to 3000ft. They're made of steel, which starts to deform around 900F. Submarines are also unbelivably heavy. Mars is the first stop. The only time Venus will ever be studied/inhabited is if it is economically feasible to mine it for materials (uranium, maybe?).

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    22. Re:Venus by Rei · · Score: 1

      I did. No hits. If I remove the quotes, you get references to them living in the *rims* of volcanoes, and around the edges of vents, but nothing in the interior (i.e., *In* the volcano). Even the most hardy Archaea can't survive more than a couple hundred degrees.

      --
      Are there any deer in the theater tonight? Get 'em up against the wall.
    23. Re:Venus by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      What about Blimps on venus =)

      Since the pressure is so great on venus, you could probablly get them to float pretty high up in the atmosphere on Venus and build cities on them.

    24. Re:Venus by shaitand · · Score: 1

      On closer inspection I see that you are indeed correct. I did the search because I had remembered reading something about bacteria being found in volcanos and the search results appeared to support that.

      I probably was remembering a Slashdot headline indicating bateria living in volcanos and pointing to an article saying bacteria lived in vents. ;)

    25. Re:Venus by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Mmm... Ice cream and cinnamon rolls... Sign me up!

    26. Re:Venus by default+luser · · Score: 1

      If I recall my Kim Stanley Robinson correctly, after the giant reflector used to warm Mars was removed, it was shipped off to Venus.

      They used it as a reflector to shield Venus from the sun, and freeze the atmosphere. Then they paved over the surface.

      Kinda involved, if you ask me :D

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    27. Re:Venus by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      If NASA had a program where they built a great new space ship that would travel to alpha centuri and back, and we were told it would take more than our lifetime, I would go. Have a family on the ship. Make it there, let the next generation study it. Eventually they would come back to earth. We would learn so much.

      The best part is, generation ships are a thing of the (sci-fi) past.

      Within 20 years, we'll have full-blown nanotech, and can then start augmenting ourselves, not worrying about dying, taking apart the planets to make a Dyson sphere (or Matrioshka Brain), and sending seeds out in all directions to ensure that, when we land, it'll be habitable.

      So you can sleep the whole way, or play chess or go or something. By then your thought processes will be so far removed from what they currently are that you'll effectively be a different person (perhaps different life form), and will likely have different games (like Star Wars chess). You'll still remember when you were in the chrysalis stage, like we remember childhood (when "God" was a big beard in the sky).

      I love the times we live in. I just hope we can stop warring because oil is pointless; we've got enough to last 20 years, and alternative fuels will blossom once we have complete control over physical matter. All those kids dying for nothing, it's really sad.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    28. Re:Venus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is a problem now, but don't rule out the possiblity of it. remember 300 years ago cell phones and computers would be put down as impossible.

  20. This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This just in: Mars Blows

    1. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the important thing to remember is:
      Mars also sucks.

    2. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mars Farts

  21. both cleans and dirties the rover by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The sporadic winds were two-edge sword. For the first [earth] year Spirit panels were getting progressing dirty, to the point where power was down to 40%. Then the one day the dust was mostly blown off and the power doubled. The fact that a devil may have actually collided with a rover suggested to NASA that they might be common enough to actively search for them.

    1. Re:both cleans and dirties the rover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If gathering dust on the solar panels reduces the power for the rovers, why didn't NASA include a device to clean off the panels? It seems like a squegee type device that moves over the panels would be very easy to implement.

    2. Re:both cleans and dirties the rover by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      yeah but there are reliability issues, issues integrating with the unfolding systems issues regarding scratching the pannels (especilly if you don't use water and water in space is expensive++ because you have to take it with you).

      theese aren't cars you can just drive them to the local garage when something breaks you have to live with it broken for the rest of the mission and if its really serious it may end the mission

      nasa decided on a design lifetime and sized the pannels to provide enough power during that lifetime. Its great that the rovers are still going but lets not forget that they were not designed to last this long.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  22. Global Warming on Mars! by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 1

    We all know those whirlwinds, which some will undoubtedly try to claim are "naturally occurring" are really caused by Global Warming on Mars caused by the Mars Lander emissions. An attempt at humor, yes. Just wait though, someone will actually end up claiming this before it is all over.

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
  23. martian pr0n by Vamphyri · · Score: 2, Funny

    carbon based life forms copulating in connubial bliss.

    How do we know that these "dust devils" aren't really martian orgies? Or those whirlwinds when the road runner and Wile E. Coyote fight? Or the cloud created when Pigpen walks anywhere in Peanuts cartoons?

    (tongue firmly in cheek)

  24. Re:What kind of analysis will scientists do with t by John+Seminal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm curious to know how much effort/man hours is put into studying this kind of phenomena. Do NASA folks just say "That's cool, look at that." like I do, or do they assign a team to spend a month trying to extrapolate airspeed, volume, spin direction, lifespan, and other attributes that I can't even think of?

    I guess I mean: does this really mean anything important to a scientist, or is it just eyecandy for the taxpayers?

    They have teams. Nothing is done because of individual interest. It is a huge beuracracy, you have managment like any business, that directs the scientists.

    It is one of the knocks on the university system. When you start out, getting your BA or AB, you can study many different things, math, biology, literature, physics, sociology, chemisty. But once you start for a PhD, you then pick one small thing and spend the next 7 years studying it and researching it. For example, you could not pick Biology for a PhD, you would pick Genetics. And even then, you're research might be limited to a subset of Genetics, maybe how Gene X produces protien Y in albinos.

    I think it would be cool if places like NASA let scientists pick thier projects. Or even let outsiders in, for example if you have a masters in geography and you're interested in helping map the surface of mars, that you can sign up for that work.

    Come to think of it, why don't they run NASA like sourcefourge. There is alot of talent out there. And it would make people feel like they are contributing to discovery, rather than living a mundane dilbertesq life.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  25. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the NASA films the acting is a little dry, but the plot is more fully realized.

  26. Re:Slightly animated dirt more exciting than shutt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  27. Looks like by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like dust kicked up by aerial machine gun fire. Maybe the martians are using the rover as a training target.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    1. Re:Looks like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if so, then they have terrible aim and our armies should easily defeat them! let's begin the conquest of mars!

  28. Harness the wind power by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    If NASA plans on setting up a Mars Colony, they could harness an endless supply of solar and wind power. Maybe it can teach us earthlings how we can better use our own free natural resources to power our grids instead of burning coal, oil and gas? Just a thought.
    Now they have pictures and movies, all we need is an audio recording of a dust storm and ambient noise on Mars and the mission will be complete.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Harness the wind power by PTBarnum · · Score: 1

      I started off writing a post about how the winds on Mars would be too weak to generate useful power, but had a momentary lapse of Slashdot protocol and decided to do a few seconds of Google research first.

      To my suprise, I found that NASA is indeed looking at wind power. Some scientists believe that Mars' dust storms contain enough force to generate power.

      See this page for more details:
      http://www.memagazine.org/supparch/mepow er03/marsn eeds/marsneeds.html

    2. Re:Harness the wind power by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, it is cool, and I was just theorizing...
      The article states: "On Earth, wind needs to blow at about 10 meters, or 33 feet, per second to operate a wind turbine, Flynn said. On Mars, it has to blow at about 30 meters, or 98 feet, per second because the planet's atmosphere is extremely thin." I am wondering if the upper atmosphere is in constant motion? Also how to repair it if it breaks or burns out, they would have to have some replacement parts or an easy way to fix it.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    3. Re:Harness the wind power by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1
      If NASA plans on setting up a Mars Colony, they could harness an endless supply of solar and wind power. Maybe it can teach us earthlings how we can better use our own free natural resources to power our grids instead of burning coal, oil and gas? Just a thought.

      I don't think that's a fair analogy. Powering two golf-cart sized rovers to crawl slowly over the Martian terrain using solar cells fueled by strong sunlight from the thin atmosphere isn't really analogous to powering even a modest compact car or my house.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
  29. I read about this over 40 years ago by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    So is no one else old enough to think of Adam Strange and the Dust Devils when reading this? Looks like NASA hit the wrong planet with their rovers.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  30. Up next: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evidence of wind around Uranus

  31. Re:Slightly animated dirt more exciting than shutt by Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, the post has no business being on Slashdot because here, you're supposed to mindlessly jeer at the Space Shuttle and call NASA a complete cultural failure. You're supposed to complain about costs and technical problems on subjects that you've never worked and hardly even know the basics about, by picking a choice selection of quotes from a handful of individuals and ignoring what the majority of those who have actually worked on the projects have stated. And lastly, no matter how ridiculously small a feat a private company achieves in reference to space, you're supposed to treat it like it's as good as a Saturn V. Strangely, there is an exception: you're supposed to ignore the actual *relevant* accomplishments of private companies in space, such as the Pegasus rocket, and only cheer for those who make joyrides.

    --
    Are there any deer in the theater tonight? Get 'em up against the wall.
  32. While not technically speaking a dupe ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... any self-respecting geek checks the rover mission website daily!

  33. I think Russians were there first... ;-) by PaulBu · · Score: 3, Informative

    This guy applies modern image processing to old tapes of raw data from Russian "Venera" missions. Quite fascinating views, but still, too hot and acidic... I guess a spacecraft gets "eaten" by the atmosphere there in like an hour...

    Paul B.

  34. Even better by mathmatt · · Score: 1

    Does this for instance imply that there is water in the air on mars?

    Actually, the presence of wind implies there is life on Mars! How could we have missed this?!

    Check it:
    There is wind on Earth.
    There is life on Earth.
    There is wind on Mars.
    Therefore, there is life on Mars.

    Try to patent this technique - oh, you can't cause it's prior art. It's my birthday! It's my birthday!

    Please note, my patent on this technique will likely serve irrelevant as the same logic implies that the universe is really a pokemon watch!

    *ducks, stands up and is hit with a tomato*

  35. Re:What kind of analysis will scientists do with t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, bein that the rovers have had their solar panels cleaned, presumably by these dust devils, it becomes a *mission critical* question to see if you can predict where a dust devil will appear so that you can park the rover there once too much dust accumulates again. Moreover you want to know how fast these things go, to a) see if/where they will harm the rover and b) see if they might be the source of erosion around the round pebbles found a while ago.

    It's really strange how these stupid-looking phenomena can become important when you're trying to make sense of a completely new environment while scraping the bottom of the barrel for anything tha might help you keep going.

  36. Re:What kind of analysis will scientists do with t by jangobongo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess I mean: does this really mean anything important to a scientist, or is it just eyecandy for the taxpayers?

    Never underestimate the power of eyecandy for the taxpayers. They want to see what their millions of dollars buy and eyecandy appeals to even the least technically minded.

    That's one great thing about these space missions. NASA, JPL, and the ESA let us see the interesting images (and the mundane ones - but no one talks about those much). Plus, the images are available to the whole world, not just U.S. taxpayers.

    So everyone, seeing these images, may become inspired to learns more about and support the sciences, including schoolchildren, some of whom may continue on to be the next generation of leaders, scientists, and explorers. Seems like a win-win situation to me.

    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
  37. Re:What kind of analysis will scientists do with t by pedroloco · · Score: 1

    I think it would be cool if places like NASA let scientists pick thier projects. Or even let outsiders in, for example if you have a masters in geography and you're interested in helping map the surface of mars, that you can sign up for that work.

    Well, if you're motivated, you can look at and work with data from NASA planetary missions. Data collected from the first 270 days of MER rover operations are available.

  38. Re:What kind of analysis will scientists do with t by QuantumFTL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess I mean: does this really mean anything important to a scientist, or is it just eyecandy for the taxpayers?

    They have teams. Nothing is done because of individual interest. It is a huge beuracracy, you have managment like any business, that directs the scientists.

    Well, yes and no. One of the scientists I work with at Cornell University is in the Atmospheric interest group of the MER project. The science team is broken up into interest groups such as Atmospheric, Geology, Soils, Long Term Planning, etc, which allows for parallel planning. Every day there is a Science Operations Working Group meeting, at which the agenda is decided - plans are merged and different courses of actions are argued. But don't think for a moment that there's never been anything done by MER simply because a single scientist thought it was important. Professor Squyres once called in on a day he wasn't even working to make sure panoramic cameras got some good images of the micrometeorite impact.

    I think it would be cool if places like NASA let scientists pick thier projects.

    I worked at JPL as an intern, and then as an operations staff worker for MER, and I can say that the people there are certainly not all working on projects that they did not choose. In fact, many were hired to work on a specific project, and while they usually move on afterwards, it's not like they are often stuck working on some project they hate. Indeed, many scientists/engineers work for NASA for such low pay precisely because they are working on something much more interesting to them than they would in industry for twice the money.

    And it would make people feel like they are contributing to discovery, rather than living a mundane dilbertesq life.

    Anyone working for NASA that feels that way is doing something wrong - when I was at JPL we had our share of management problems and budget issues, but it was anything *BUT* dilbert. Most of the coworkers are as crazy as you, the ideas that are being worked on even crazier... The pioneer feeling doesn't seem to really fade... even if what you are working on has been done before many times, it's still new, because it's innnnn spaaaaaaaaaaaaace!.

    Come to think of it, why don't they run NASA like sourceforge.

    Because most people aren't rocket scientists? Because spreading around responsibility too thinly is the surest way to see that nothing gets done (or no one is held accountable)?

    Don't get me wrong - I'd love to see the NASA change to be more agile, more risk-taking and more "open ended" in some ways - but lets get real, this is the government. (insert typical slashdot statement about writing to senators or voting your opinion - doesn't change the fact that most people in the country simply do not CARE about this at all).

  39. WRONG WRONG WRONG!!! by Beautyon · · Score: 1

    It is precisely:

    'Illudium Pew-36 Explosive Space Modulator'

    1953: Duck Dodgers in the 24 1/2 Century
    Daffy Duck,Porky Pig,Marvin Martian: July,25 MM Chuck Jones

    Marvin makes his third appearance in this cartoon parody of
    Buck Rogers in the 25th Century.Duck Dodgers(Daffy Duck) and his eager space cadet, Porky Pig, traval to Planet X, the only remaining source of Illudium Phosdex(the shaving cream atom) to claim it for Earth. But Duck Dodgers winds up in a battle with Marvin, who's dead-set on claiming Planet X in the name of Mars.

    CANT YOU PEOPLE READ?!

    --
    ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
  40. The MPAA Responds by superultra · · Score: 1

    In a press statement from the Martian Picture Association of Alterion, Director Zerfig Mowbelfub stated that, "NASA needs to learn that it cannot indiscriminately share Martian movies on the internet as it pleases. Many Martians have worked very hard to create these whirlwinds, and recording them and then sharing them on the Internet is a violation of Galactic Copyright Law." The press release also stated that from now on Martians will search every NASA Lander for recording technology and confiscate it upon entry to the Mars atmosphere. NASA was unavailable for comment, but as of press time the movies were still widely available on the Internet with no official response from NASA.

  41. Windfarms on Mars by Aeternal · · Score: 1

    Do we really want the surface of Mars covered with huge windmills? That would tend to spoil the view. I'd prefer a nuclear power station myself.

  42. warm to the touch by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    the explanation says the surface is warm to the touch.

    obviously there is something they havn't told us.

    Bush has gotten man to Mars! Gooooo Leader!

    --

    -pyrrho

  43. Come on funny dood...import is there by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 1

    NASA now knows it's time to scrap the the idea of housing Mar's colonists in mobile homes.

  44. Re:Slightly animated dirt more exciting than shutt by selectspec · · Score: 1

    Must have hit him right on the mark to get him all rowled up like that.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  45. Bad /.ers by CFTM · · Score: 1

    All I seem to be seeing in these posts are reasons why we couldn't do it, just because we don't have all the tools that we need to make a viable system at the moment doesn't mean that those tools could not be created.

    As it stands, we have ceramics that can withstand the tempature but I don't know how ceramics react under intense pressure. I understand that just a ceramic shell would not, in and of itself, be enough because as far as I know (although I'm no materials engineer) ceramics don't do that whole conducting thing [although I think I read somewhere that certain types of ceramics start have similar properties as superconducters near 0 kalvin].

    My whole point is this, rather then looking at what's not possible why don't we assume we don't know what is and is not possible and work out from there? Ambitious projects require a reasonable amount of unreasonability....

  46. I wish we could hear the dust devils. by BigBunny · · Score: 1

    It surprises me that there isn't some sort of microphone on the rovers to pick up "whatever."

    You never know what we might hear.

    --
    old geek
  47. Huygens took them offline for awhile by AntonVoyl · · Score: 1

    JPL's servers were overwhelmed the day Huygens took the plunge into Titan. Yes, it's a different order of magnitude than a Slashdotting, but even NASA has limits (in terms of serving up webpages).

    --

    sig semper tyrannis!
  48. Re:Planet Weather - Rick Santorum says NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/news/epa per/2005/04/21/m1a_wx_0421.html

    No More Free Weather Reports if Rick Santorum
    has his way.

  49. Oh great by shplorb · · Score: 1

    We better be packing BFG's when we land there. With dust devils now being confirmed there's bound to be a Cyberdemon or two lurking around there.

    "Hey George, there's hellspawn on Mars... time to wage another crusade to rid the solar system of evil!"