Slashdot Mirror


HP Announces National Id System Built on .NET

Anonymous Coward writes "Yahoo is running a story about HP's national ID plan, 'The need to securely identify people moving across national and international borders has never been more important than it is today,' said Jim Ganthier, worldwide leader, Defense, Intelligence and Public Safety, HP. 'HP and Microsoft are working together to provide government agencies the ability to access the integrated data streams needed to securely identify people both in the physical and virtual worlds.'"

393 comments

  1. I'm pretty torn about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't decide if I'm upset because it's a National ID, because it's made by HP or because it's being built on .NET.

    1. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by BrynM · · Score: 5, Funny
      I can't decide if I'm upset because it's a National ID, because it's made by HP or because it's being built on .NET.
      The answer you seek is "Yes".
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    2. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Coming from HP, I was expecting something more along the lines of "All your prints are belong to us."

    3. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by 1zenerdiode · · Score: 1

      You spelled asinine wrong.

    4. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by BrynM · · Score: 1
      You spelled asinine wrong.
      Exactly. Call it bait.
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    5. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by 1zenerdiode · · Score: 1

      Eye luvv itt!

    6. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      I'm upset because they will probably want to tattoo the ID number on my forehead.

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    7. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm upset because they will probably want to tattoo the ID number on my forehead.

      Don't worry about it; I believe the right hand is considered an acceptable alternative.

    8. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by CSMastermind · · Score: 1

      Well the good news is that because it's a National ID we take another step towards the poitn where the people stand up and say, "Enough is enough for god sake". Then because it's from HP, it'll be badly designed and break about once a month (don't think I'll be making too many support calls to help them fix my government tracking device), and thankfully, microsoft is involved so we know it will be bloated and inefficent (I'm still waiting for the open source version).

    9. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by PakProtector · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, that's okay. You won't have to worry about that.

      With a /. UID that low, your hand's gonna start flashing red any second now.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    10. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by wft_rtfa · · Score: 1
      You shouldn't be surprised it's written in .NET. The top two enterprise development technologies are Java and .NET. Who do you think pays more money to lobby for these types of projects, Sun or Microsoft?

      Anyways, .NET isn't a bad technology and HP isn't a bad company either. It sounds like this could have been worse.

      --
      :-] :0 :-> :-| :->
    11. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1
      With a /. UID that low, your hand's gonna start flashing red any second now.

      No problems there either; since it's a /. uid, the hair on my palm will hide the light.
      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    12. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by trucker3406e · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because someone came up with Idea doesnt mean we have to use it. Its obvious that this "ID" system is a complete and utter violation of the right to privacy. However no one seems to care what the bill of rights says anymore. I hope enough ppl know what tosay to a national ID system...

    13. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      I'm upset because they will probably want to tattoo the ID number on my forehead.

      It's the mark of the beast! ;-)

      Falcon
    14. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it deliberate irony, or were you unaware that 'asinine' is the correct spelling?

    15. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by jaavaaguru · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'd rather read a badly spelled insightful comment than most other comments, but I find the ones with bad grammar very difficult to read. I think bad spelling's easier to deal with because misspelled words at least sound like the word they're meant to be.

    16. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention that... next year when I turn 30 I'm going to have a combined Logan's Run birthday party (a close friend and I are one day apart). Woot.

      --
      Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
    17. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by halr9000 · · Score: 1

      I work for HP. More or less, I think we make great products. But that was really funny. :)

    18. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by bynary · · Score: 1

      HP isn't a bad company either

      I beg (on oh so many levels) to disagree with you.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    19. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you're not taking into account inflation... Mine's about to go off in August, when I turn 20...

      See, it's been deemed that since I like the 80's so much, they've stepped mine up to accomodate my tastes.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    20. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by BrynM · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      This is getting waaayyyy offtopic. I de-bonus-ed this comment so hopefuly it won't show up in the actual thread. If a mod comes by to bless it with an "off-topic" please do so. While I'm at it, I'll reply to the AC as well.

      I like to poke at grammar nazis, but pride myself on spelling well. "Asinine" is such a seldomly used word that it's easy to be misspelled by members of the grammar ruling class. It is true that the only "e" in the word is at the end, but you can't believe how many people try to "correct" it. It's there as bait. So far today is the only actual post that's tried to correct it, but soooo many over the shoulder non-posters have let their egos get the best of them. Trying not to give in myself, I am making a point of not correcting them (god it's taking some will though). I do it as a poke, but intend it all in fun.

      By the way, my journal entries are where I archive my sigs, so please talk about them there and leave the articles clean.

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    21. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by jonwest101 · · Score: 1

      Have you programmed in .NET? I don't like Microsoft Windows or Microsoft in general, but .NET is the most powerful programming platform out there. It makes GUI interfaces a breeze. What took a 3 hour seminar in Java took 10 minutes in a .NET seminar.

    22. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yur quik.

    23. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      microsoft is involved so we know it will be bloated and inefficent

      I thought Sun invented Java.

    24. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by castanaveras · · Score: 1

      If you want to get technical, it flashes black - the palmflower turns red for the last phase of a citizen's life, and only starts flashing black-red-black-red on Lastday.

    25. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod parent up. I dislike, almost hate Microsoft for their business practices and poor design, but .NET is an incredible framework that may be the only good, and great, design decision Microsoft has ever made. It ranks up there on my list with Unix security and Mac OS X graphics/usability.

      (Not everything is perfect, I've seen parts of System.Windows.Forms break, but that in my opinion is not the heart of .NET).

    26. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Your sentence structure is wrong, too. You put "badly spelled" before "insightful" but "asenine" before "correctly spelled".

      That's just warped, man.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    27. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "so please talk about them there and leave the articles clean."

      Are you new here? That goes against the community behavior. "Off-topic" is ALWAYS ON-TOPIC here!

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    28. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Why are you upset?

      If it's being done by HP in .NET, it can't work!

      We're safe! The only way we could be safer is if it was being done by Microsoft in .NET.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    29. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by soluzar22 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Your view can hardly be considered objective. Given the choice between an HP product and an equivalent product not manufactured by HP, then I would always choose the non-HP alternative. No exceptions. This is not predjudice, this is years of experience in college and in the workplace.

      In fact, I think I'd rather go without the capability to produce hard copy than use an HP printer. Assuming that those were the only choices.

    30. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by halr9000 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I didn't say I actually bought any of our stuff. :)

      I do typically recommend HP over other big name vendors for family members, that sort of thing though.

      P.S. thanks for trolling

    31. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Great, all we need is Microsoft technology in a system like this. My grandmother will no doubt be flagged as a terrorist.

      Then we'll have to reboot the nation.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    32. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by FxChiP · · Score: 1
      Then because it's from HP, it'll be badly designed and break about once a month...

      Not to mention all the sales they'll be losing. :)
    33. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by aled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It makes GUI interfaces a breeze. What took a 3 hour seminar in Java took 10 minutes in a .NET seminar.

      Surely that proves .Net is the platform of choice for a national id system for a few hundred million people.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    34. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by f0rt0r · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Cmon, discussing spelling is on-topic in that it provides information useful for understanding the topic in full. Really....I am not kidding you!

      --
      I can't afford a sig!
    35. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Please explain to me what makes you think that HP is not a bad company.

      Hell, I think they're bad just for getting involved with this debacle. I used to just think they were mismanaged and incompetent. Now they're out to take away my liberties, and that makes me not happy.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    36. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by Moofie · · Score: 1

      They say OH MY GOD PLEASE PROTECT ME FROM TERRORISTS!

      The public has been whipped into submission. They'll take this, and they'll like it.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    37. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Your view can hardly be considered objective. Given the choice between an HP product and an equivalent product not manufactured by HP, then I would always choose the non-HP alternative. No exceptions.

      I'm very happy with my Laserjet 4. Look for LJ4, 5 or 6 secondhand if you want an indestructible efficient printer (not the "L" or "P" models, though). Because these are 10 or more years old now companies are throwing them out. I got mine for $50, new was about $1800 and it works as well as it ever did. Toner refills are remarkably cheap too, unlike many modern printers with weird chips to prevent refilling.

    38. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by Ours · · Score: 1

      I don't see where the number of people is a problem with the platform. The important thing is the database and chances are it's going to be MS SQL Server. If done properly I don't see what the fuss is all about. US shouldn't worry about a national ID. They should worry about how the laws allow corporations to use people's data and sell it.

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    39. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by chrish · · Score: 1

      If you're interested in making GUI interfaces, you should really check out Apple's Interface Builder and Objective-C. Once you figure out how it works, it'll make your .NET and Java GUI experiences look like programming in assembly language.

      I've been very impressed since I started looking into Cocoa.

      --
      - chrish
    40. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by wft_rtfa · · Score: 1
      Please explain to me what makes you think that HP is not a bad company.

      I guess I didn't put a lot of thought in to that statement, but I've always liked their printers.

      Anyways, my point was that with a big company like HP, the project is less likely to totally screwed up like the Boston traffic management system or the Denver airport. As this project won't be everything to them, and their reputation is on the line.

      Now they're out to take away my liberties

      Blame your congressmen for that one. That's like blaming Lockheed Martin for the war in Iraq.

      --
      :-] :0 :-> :-| :->
    41. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by Moofie · · Score: 1

      HP's big laser printers are good hardware, with completely shit drivers. Their drivers have been shit for years, and they're not getting better.

      Every actor is responsible for their own actions. Just because the Congresscritters and the administration are taking away my liberties doesn't absolve HP from their responsibility for facilitating.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    42. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by aled · · Score: 1

      Read the original post. Then read my reply again. I was making a sarcastic comment about his reasoning.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    43. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by soluzar22 · · Score: 1

      Trolling? How?

      That's the first negative mod I've had in ages. I expressed my opinion, and pointed out that yours is not objective. "Troll" is a little much.

    44. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by soluzar22 · · Score: 1

      I'll admit, reluctantly, that the older LJs are decent. On the other hand, every inkjet they ever made is a piece of irreceemable junk in my opinion. If I get modded for this, as well as for my last comment, then that will prove that /. has become a place where you can't express an opinion.

    45. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      Actually I'd prefer they choose something flashy but without teeth... let em spend time on a UI, since it's so easy and will get done first, then run out of money and never actually establish any backend that works.

      That'll give us time to get the Real ID act overthrown in court.

    46. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by halr9000 · · Score: 1

      FWIW I didn't mod you down, I don't mod negative if I can help it. (Sometimes it's a must.)

      But to explain why I thought you were trolling, I read it as you saw that I worked for HP, and decided to bash HP's products. If it makes you feel any better, a friend at work make fun of me all the time for not buying HP. :)

    47. Re:I'm pretty torn about this by soluzar22 · · Score: 1

      I never thought you were the modder, actually. That would be impossible, you posted in this discussion.

      Yeah, I'm an HP hater, so I guess I did deserve the mod down.

  2. Microsoft: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where would you like your identity to go today?

    1. Re:Microsoft: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You may mean that in jest (or maybe not) but seriously, with microsoft's absolutely WOEFUL security record, a record of being constantly INsecure, of constantly avoiding fixing problems when they're raised, time after time after time... I have to ask

      Are HP completely braindead?

      If HP were farmers: "HP announces alliance with Lions, Jackals and Wolves to mind sheep & lambs".

    2. Re:Microsoft: by PakProtector · · Score: 2, Funny

      You say insecure like it's a bad thing. I happen to have it on good authority that insecure is about to be the next big cool buzzword.

      Bobby: Hey, it says here on this review that this software is really insecure.

      James: So, we don't wanna go with that right?

      Tim: Are you kidding? They're INsecure. That's gotta be like, what, THOUSANDS of times better than just 'secure.'

      Bobby: Clerk? We'll take ten thousand units.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    3. Re:Microsoft: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is probably not what you meant but... So far I haven't ever felt the need to buy a fake ID, but if my country decided to track all my activities, I would go out and buy several fake IDs that I would use to cover my tracks. Not because I do anything criminal, but because I value my privacy.

      'The need to securely identify people moving across national and international borders has never been more important than it is today,'

      Yes, police states make everybody a criminal, one way or another.

    4. Re:Microsoft: by trogdor8667 · · Score: 1

      So first Bank of America has a security breach to lose all my personal data including bank accounts and the like, and now Microsoft will be incharge of my National ID? Great. I'm just ecstatic about this one.

      Would it just save us some trouble if they made a webpage where we could submit our personal information to all the thieves and everyone to save them the time?

    5. Re:Microsoft: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >If HP were farmers: "HP announces alliance with Lions, Jackals and Wolves to mind sheep &
      >lambs".

      that is the single funniest thing i have ever seen on slashdot.

    6. Re:Microsoft: by Presidential · · Score: 1
      Where would you like your identity to go today?


      Maybe more like Who would you like to be today?
      --
      Whenever Mrs. Fitch breaks wind, we beat the dog.
    7. Re:Microsoft: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for clearing that up! I always get confuzzled by these new buzzwords. Now thanks to you and Slashdot, I know what to look for when choosing new software. W00t!

    8. Re:Microsoft: by cillasri · · Score: 1

      1) To the Recycle Bin
      2) To the nearest spammer
      3) To the nearest phiser
      4) To Microsoft itself
      5) To the government

    9. Re:Microsoft: by Elranzer · · Score: 1

      If HP were farmers: "HP announces alliance with Lions, Jackals and Wolves to mind sheep & lambs".

      These must be the same guys who helped fun the Phantom Console, eh.

    10. Re:Microsoft: by Moofie · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that anybody who's paying for this debacle, or being paid for this debacle, wants it to be secure?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  3. euh.. by Acid-Duck · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Do we really want microsoft involved in something which will identify us? I think not!

    Erik

  4. Halt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your papers please!

    All appears to be in order.
    Proceed Citizen.

    But be aware. Ve are vatching you!!

  5. They clearly want a piece of the pie. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Informative

    The UK ID card system is now estimated at £18 billion (30 billion dollars or so). That's up from £3 billion and £6 billion previous estimates.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4590817.stm

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:They clearly want a piece of the pie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UK ID card system is now estimated at £18 billion (30 billion dollars or so).

      You'd think they could spend a few million of that on inventing a convincing explanation of what it's supposed to achieve.

    2. Re:They clearly want a piece of the pie. by rpozz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thanks for the link.

      The LSE study also raised the issue of people who are against ID cards, called "refuseniks". It said: "The costs of handling this group will be substantial".

      Looks like it's possible for the general public to do something about this one. Enough noise about it and it'll be too expensive and political suicide. The use of the word 'handling' is quite disturbing though.

      Given our government's total incompetence at handling things like this, I'd imagine it will end up costing even more if implemented.

    3. Re:They clearly want a piece of the pie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I do know that HP will not ever be getting any of my business in the future. So, I guess they found some corrupted governments willing to take up the slack.

    4. Re:They clearly want a piece of the pie. by sweetfathairyjesus · · Score: 1

      Enough noise about it and it'll be too expensive and political suicide. Hmmm, can anyone say "War In Iraq"?

    5. Re:They clearly want a piece of the pie. by rpozz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it nearly got Blair kicked out. The minority of people voted him (around 36% IIRC). Something which will directly affect people's lives will cause a lot more outrage. We can also actively obstruct it rather than just protesting.

    6. Re:They clearly want a piece of the pie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean:

      "Given our government's total incompetence at handling things like this^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H,"

    7. Re:They clearly want a piece of the pie. by payndz · · Score: 1
      The UK ID card system is now estimated at £18 billion

      Or UKP300 per person, at the current population of 60 million. Now gee, will everyone will be given their 'mandatory' ID card for free? Somehow I don't think so.

      --
      You must think in Russian.
    8. Re:They clearly want a piece of the pie. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It was nowhere near kicking Blair out. They still have a 66 seat overall majority. That's bigger that Thatcher got after the winter of discontent, and bigger than Major got in 1992.

    9. Re:They clearly want a piece of the pie. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      You know, I just don't feel comfortable that my Life, Liberty, and Persuit of Happyness is now in the hands of a third party closed source software company run by convicted bad guys.

    10. Re:They clearly want a piece of the pie. by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      Or UKP300 per person, at the current population of 60 million.

      And that's assuming it'll be paid off instantly, rather than be added to the national debt to gain interest for years.

  6. Security? by robotsrule · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So if someone exploits a security hole in .NET they can take my identity?

    --


    Robert Oschler - RobotsRule.com
    1. Re:Security? by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      can take my identity

      The word you are looking for is fake.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    2. Re:Security? by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Informative

      So if someone exploits a security hole in .NET they can take my identity?

      Maybe, maybe not, it depends on how their platform works. But the same can of course be said with any other API an application may use. Not sure what you're trying to say -- that these important systems should always be built from scratch? But the downside of that is you'd rely on 100% homebrewn code that hasn't been tested in production ready systems since before.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:Security? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Maybe not. If someone had enough access into the system, not only could they pretend to be you, but they could gimick it so that you couldn't be you. (At least not without a lot of PITA effort.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Security? by samael · · Score: 1

      The same is true of any identity system - although you'd hope that the security will be built in such a way that it depends on more than OS/framework security.

    5. Re:Security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Would you rather a hole which required a recompilation of every piece of code and then a redistribution and upgrade of the application at each point it is used?

      C# trades you those old fashioned buffer overflows for a language where you have two problems, logic flaws and runtime flaws. If the runtime flaw is found, it's boatload easier to fix and redistribute, and you can do so knowing it wont break your application. Logic flaws are just common programming errors, and you have those anyway regardless of language, thats what testing is designed to find. Runtime environment errors in .NET are much easier to fix than the bugs that crop up in unmanaged language code.

      From a management perspective, having a runtime that can be patched once, protecting all applications on the system from a hole is much more preferable to a system where if a hole is found, each individual executable file and library needs to be recompiled, and then redistributed to each machine. With a System Update Server running, you can patch a whole high-school in fifteen minutes, so imagine which route was the easiest to follow :)

    6. Re:Security? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      SILENCE USER #805458!!!! Please go back to your home. Everything here is in order.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:Security? by jazzman251 · · Score: 0

      So if someone exploits a security hole in .NET they can take my identity?

      Dont you mean when someone exploits a security hole in .NET?

    8. Re:Security? by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 1
      So if someone exploits a security hole in .NET they can take my identity?

      You think?

    9. Re:Security? by fsterman · · Score: 1

      The problem is that Bill has formed a company where spaghetti code is okay. They force through projects before they are near done, and as a result everything not only is full of bugs but also incredibly insescure.

      --
      Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
  7. FP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FP?

  8. Initiate Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already makes such a system. It's quite expensive (like in the tens of millions) but it works very well. It's in version SIX right now.

  9. Worldwide leader, defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jim Ganthier, worldwide leader, Defense, Intelligence and Public Safety

    Worldwide leader? Who is he interested in defending us from, aliens?

    1. Re:Worldwide leader, defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jim Ganthier, worldwide leader, Defense, Intelligence and Public Safety

      It just means he sells to all sides. USA, you want a way to track everyone in your country? Certainly, we can provide that. Osama, you want a way to track key US citizens? We have the very thing!

  10. Oh, well then... by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 3, Funny

    Microsoft is helping to make it. That makes me feel SO safe.

    --
    Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
    1. Re:Oh, well then... by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      Trust big brother.

      He is your friend.

      Resistance is futile!

    2. Re:Oh, well then... by RTFA · · Score: 0

      Now I'm proud to be a canadian!

      --
      This comment was written using 100% reused electrons.
    3. Re:Oh, well then... by S3D · · Score: 1

      They should include Packard-Bell into consortium.

    4. Re:Oh, well then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funniest. Post. Evar. Original too.

  11. Five Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be Afraid. Be Very Afraid.

  12. Well... by Crimson+Dragon · · Score: 1, Troll

    If .NET is not fit for Longhorn, how is it fit in this enlarged and more crucial role? I truly hope that those whom get presented this idea also get presented this fact as well.

    --
    The Crimson Dragon
    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to completely misread a slashdot troll article and come to a retarded conclusion. Back to special ed with you.

    2. Re:Well... by Jugalator · · Score: 0

      If .NET is not fit for Longhorn, how is it fit in this enlarged and more crucial role?

      Because speed isn't as much of an issue for this?

      You're comparing OS kernels with ID systems. Apples and oranges. OS kernels require extreme performance and direct hardware access among other things; obviously an ID system may not need these things as badly.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:Well... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      .Net will be a large part of longhorn, applications will talk to it, however the kernel and hardware drivers will still be unmanaged code.

      Just imagine the alternative and picture the scene if the core was written using .Net, the worlds first kernel written in Visual Basic!
      !shudder!

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:Well... by Crimson+Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes I am. Quite right. Except the comparison is large apples (national ID system) versus tiny apples (OS on a PC). I don't care about performance: I care about security. Part of the reason for the .net scrap was SECURITY based.

      --
      The Crimson Dragon
    5. Re:Well... by danheskett · · Score: 1

      I care about security. Part of the reason for the .net scrap was SECURITY based.
      Do you have any references, or any backup for this claim? Links or quotes or somesuch?

    6. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Part of the reason for the .net scrap was SECURITY based."

      I'm quite sure that isn't true.

    7. Re:Well... by Crimson+Dragon · · Score: 1
      --
      The Crimson Dragon
    8. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If .NET is not fit for Longhorn, how is it fit in this enlarged and more crucial role?

      Isn't it obvious? Microsoft get their new .NET beta tested on a large-scale project for free. The government eats the cost of all the point-oh bugs, and only then will Microsoft build their operating system around it.

    9. Re:Well... by MassacrE · · Score: 1

      how about re: security-related

    10. Re:Well... by NuclearRampage · · Score: 1

      That says nothing about security. Not sure how you inferred your statement from such a small text. The article does suggest that .NET 2.0 is too new to be labeled as stable enough for something as important as an OS core. .NET itself is not insecure, rather it is software it runs on top that is insecure.

    11. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      re: slashdot troll article

      Isn't that redundant most of the time?

    12. Re:Well... by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Nothing about security playing a role.. anything else? I am very interested in this topic!

    13. Re:Well... by Crimson+Dragon · · Score: 1

      How is stability not linked to security?

      --
      The Crimson Dragon
    14. Re:Well... by NuclearRampage · · Score: 1

      I don't see how it is. Just because something might crash does not make it insecure, to my knowledge. That's what stability and security are always discussed separately.

  13. I wonder if HP was one of the ones by hsmith · · Score: 1

    who lobbied for this legislation? i think it would be interesting to see who all was pushing for the RealID (besides senators trying to cover their asses)

    1. Re:I wonder if HP was one of the ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (besides senators trying to cover their asses)

      They're the worst. The true believers might have limits to what they'll sign up for or can be convinced to change their minds. The ones that don't truly support it but vote yes anyway are the most dangerous.

  14. What will the new venture be called? by 1zenerdiode · · Score: 1

    Carly Fiorina has been brought out of a retirement to assist in finding a name for the new venture that is seven letters long and ends in "-ent."

    1. Re:What will the new venture be called? by danknight · · Score: 1

      SOLV-ent ?

      --
      wanted: one clever sig,apply within
    2. Re:What will the new venture be called? by louarnkoz · · Score: 1

      AXID-ent.

    3. Re:What will the new venture be called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Invent.

      Wasn't HP's tagline "Invent" during the Carly years? Through Carly they invented the "1+1=0.9" merger with HP; and they invented the strategy of switching from a technology leader to a microsoft reseller. I bet she's so proud of here accomplishments (her serverance package) under the Invent tagline she keeps running with it.

  15. Whoever would have thought by instantkarma1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    that the answer to all of our homeland security issues would be Micrsoft?

    Gee, I feel more secure already.

  16. I'm guessing that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They mean enterprise-size ID systems. Like for businesses that are nation-wide.

    If I'm wrong please let me know... but I hate it when people spin the headline.

  17. .NET + HP + National ID by yotto · · Score: 4, Funny

    What could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:.NET + HP + National ID by superyooser · · Score: 1
      What could possibly go wrong?

      It could work.

    2. Re:.NET + HP + National ID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP does have experience in ID systems - they built them in several countries (like those mentioned in the article) and the systems use HP hardware, MS software and they do work.

  18. If 9/11 happens again... by Husgaard · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... the US government will have a fine excuse: "The Windows server crashed, there was nothing we could do."

    1. Re:If 9/11 happens again... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Funny

      Be thankful for small mercies.

      The bid from Real to host the system was rejected.

      Please wait, connecting to ident server.

      Husgaard(858362) is a confirmed ..buffering(5%).. ..buffering(12%).. ..buffering(27%).. ..buffering(46%).. ..buffering(68%).. ..buffering(89%).. ..buffering(95%)..

      valid citizen

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  19. dumb question but... by blackcoot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they intend to build a secure national id system out of technologies which have proven themselves to be insecure at each turn?

    god forbid there ever be something like code red or equivalent that hits this system, because the resulting sound will be that of 280 odd million people being simultaneously sodomized by very large cacti.

    1. Re:dumb question but... by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't heard a lot about .NET itself being insecure. Microsoft's non-.NET stuff has proven to be insecure, but I really haven't heard much of .NET.

    2. Re:dumb question but... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      that of 280 odd million people being simultaneously sodomized by very large cacti.

      As one of those 280-odd million, I sincerely hope you are speaking metaphorically.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:dumb question but... by grcumb · · Score: 1

      "I haven't heard a lot about .NET itself being insecure."

      It may be secure, but it runs on Windows, a notoriously insecure platform.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    4. Re:dumb question but... by blackcoot · · Score: 1

      as another of those 280 million, i hope i'm speaking metaphorically too. that said, you won't catch me near the desert any time soon ;-)

    5. Re:dumb question but... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      So, would running the project under Mono make it more secure?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  20. No need to worry by SupremeTaco · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm trying out the beta version, and it includes an option for anonymous posting on Slashdot. See, it works just fine!!
    -----
    Name: Richard Kniefle
    Citizen Location: San Francisco, CA
    Occupation: Hospital Records Manager
    SSN: 123-12-1234
    DOB: 04-23-59
    Political Affiliation: Liberal Democrat
    Status: Citizen of Concern
    Church Affiliation: None

    --
    You have a constitutionally protected right to be wrong, and I the right to ignore you.
    1. Re:No need to worry by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dear Me Kniefle,

      It appears as though your .Net National ID software is suffering from some teething troubles.
      Please update to the latest version immediately to rectify this issue.

      I have attached the changelog for your information.

      Sincerely

      HP Dev labs

      --------- Attachment: changelog.txt
      v1.02 : gb : 192.168.0.3 : Missed off extra info fields, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Credit Card Number and Car Reg #. Update for fix

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  21. What happened to privacy? by xmundt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Greetings and Salutations...
    I would feel far better about this if;
    a) the bad guys would play by the rules and register for their identity cards just like us law-abiding citizens and...
    b) We did not have such a long history of government abusing power that it takes.

    It may be a more complex world now, but, because of that, privacy should be even more valuable and preserved...rather than being stripped away.
    While there is no current indications that this ID card will become a required, internal passport, there is a VERY good chance it will be...which undercuts one of the mainstays of American life - that of unfettered travel throughout the country. It could, alas, lead to a totalitarian state on a VERY easy road. Read Lewis Sinclair's "It Can't Happen Here", and see if you see any parallels between HIS thesis and OUR reality today!
    On top of that, I have little confidence in the government or large organizations to keep accurate enough records to make this workable. So far, the track record is not great.

    Regards
    Dave Mundt

    --
    YAB - http://blog.beemandave.com/
    1. Re:What happened to privacy? by hahiss · · Score: 1

      Dave,

      Please step away from the keyboard and come out with your hands up. This is the department of homeland security, and we have the place surrounded. We have transportation ready to take you to the re-education camp at Guantanamo Bay.

      Sincerely,

      General Anonymous
      Head of Re-education
      US DOHS

      --
      "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
    2. Re:What happened to privacy? by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Actually, the people involved in the 2001-09-11 terrorist attacks all had valid ID (driver's licenses and so on, that is; the sort of ID that you already have today). What makes anyone think they wouldn't get national ID cards, too?

      The problem really is that once you actually find out that a suicide bomber means trouble, it's too late, because then he's already dead. The fact that you could find an ID card afterwards doesn't make a difference anymore.

      So there's really no reason why you should feel safer just because the bad guys get ID cards, too.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  22. takedown! by kreativemind · · Score: 1

    Maybe its not HP or Intel or others we have to worry about, atleast i feel that they are being manipulated by Micro$oft (MS) to join some kinda of alliance to govern identities world-wide with unique and traceble ID systems. The problems is MS and its vast network of partners. Soon we will see MS at its glory with the world at the palm of its hand - and then what!?!?! (BAAM)!! they get hit and charged for monopolizing the industries and takedown by governments that will want to have control over these ID systems. I fear this most than anything else!

    1. Re:takedown! by chrisbeach · · Score: 1

      It's all a big conspiracy! They'll hunt you down, steal your identity, trap you in a metal cage... with tubes in your neck! Evil Microsoft, how we fear you!

  23. so if it bsods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will you be dead for the gov?
    not have to pay taxes, not being drafted ect?

    well then i must say that i suport our new .net overlords

  24. Obligatory Sark Quote from Tron by xactuary · · Score: 1

    Sark: Greetings. The Master Control Program has chosen you to serve your system on the Game Grid. Those of you who continue to profess a belief in the Users will receive the standard substandard training, which will result in your eventual elimination. Those of you who renounce this superstitious and hysterical belief will be eligible to join the warrior elite of the MCP. You will each receive an identity disk. Everything you do or learn will be imprinted on this disk. If you lose your disk or fail to obey commands, you will be subject to immediate de-resolution. That will be all.

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
  25. Marketspeak Mumbo Jumbo by maynard · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow, just what did that press release say beyond "we're going to help create a national ID using Microsoft .net"??? A whole lot of veribiage and redundant terminology. For example:

    • 22 instances of "indentify" or "identification"
    • 7 instances of "integrate"
    • 7 instances of "system"
    • 5 instances of "e-government"
    • 4 instances of ".NET framework"
    • 3 instances of "authenticate"
    Feh. That's enough of reading through that tripe. Now I need to take a bath. --M
    1. Re:Marketspeak Mumbo Jumbo by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Would you be happier if the press release read: HP Announces New National Identity System Solution Built on Linux Platform?

    2. Re:Marketspeak Mumbo Jumbo by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      At least with open source you get to see what the program is doing. With closed combined with the DMCA even attempting to find out what the software is doing will make you a felon.

      Plus you pay taxes don't you, so not only will some crap software be keeping track of your every move, you will be paying for it in annual licence fees. Don't pay the fees and it is off to the pound for you.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Marketspeak Mumbo Jumbo by maynard · · Score: 1

      No. I would be happier with several million dollars, a beautiful house, a yaught, and a hot brunette wife. But that's just me. --M

  26. In this system... by Roofus · · Score: 3, Funny

    HP provides the hardware, and Microsoft provides the software. It's like the worst of both worlds!

    1. Re:In this system... by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot, the US government provides the "great idea" as well as the "implementation", the "budget", the "users", and the "continued support". meh

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    2. Re:In this system... by turgid · · Score: 1

      So the hardware will be late and the software will never work. Maybe that's not such a bad thing after all :-)

    3. Re:In this system... by anticypher · · Score: 1

      It could be worse...

      Hardware by HP using Intel Itanium in 32bit mode,
      Software by M$,
      Project management by Accidenture,
      Financial oversight by Halliburton,
      Telecoms infrastructure by Verizon and Worldc^WMCI.

      Oh, yes, it could be worse. I'll stop here before I give somebody ideas to really make this project a failure. HP+M$ is enough to guarantee failure.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    4. Re:In this system... by northcat · · Score: 1

      Why do you say that? Is HP hardware generally regarded as bad? Why so?

    5. Re:In this system... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haliburton isn't a financial company.

  27. fuck off by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Simplely put, the government can fuck off. I will downright refuse to use ANYTHING built on microsoft technology which is this important. If all my personal data is being kept on it then I DEMAND security above and beyond anything MS has ever done.

    I don't care if I get arrested 100 times over for refusing to carry an ID card, it'll be worth it.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting arrested 100 times may not be so bad...

      How about getting arrested ONCE and never being freed?

    2. Re:fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I will downright refuse to use ANYTHING built on microsoft technology

      Well then I guess you refuse to use airlines, banks, power companies, mortgage companies, amazon.com, etc.

      I don't care if I get arrested 100 times

      Yeah, that will really be worth it. You will sure show them.

    3. Re:fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will free him. And I won't be doing it with an ID card.

    4. Re:fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think you proved the point of you being a lunatic, that does not really care about security, but cares that MS should not make the product.

    5. Re:fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is how grassroots efforts are started, by taking a stand. Do YOU have the balls to stand up against something you know isn't right? Apparently not. The least you can do is accept your fate with grace and dignity, and shut the fuck up. The rest WILL fight for their rights, and freedoms, isn't THAT what started the USA?

    6. Re:fuck off by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Should note I'm English and it takes alot for us to take a stand.. Infact I'm going to write a letter to the "powers that be" later.

      --
      I like muppets.
    7. Re:fuck off by AlephNot · · Score: 1

      "Well then I guess you refuse to use airlines, banks, power companies, mortgage companies, amazon.com, etc."

      You left of the GP's post's phrase "which is this important" (or something like that). Amazon.com is nowhere near as important as what is at stake here. Also, I highly doubt airlines and banks use Windows for their truly mission-critical apps, like keeping planes in the sky and money flowing through the wires. Hell, I wouldn't even trust Mac OS X or Linux in situations like those (typing this on a Powerbook running OS X).

      "Yeah, that will really be worth it. You will sure show them."

      I actually agree with you here. Even if the GP has the balls to try to pull off a Rosa Parks, I doubt the media will cover it enough to make a difference.

      --
      "Feel a glory in so rolling / on the human heart a stone" --E. A. Poe, "The Bells"
    8. Re:fuck off by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      As far as you know, if the cards were based on Linux technology, the original lunatic err poster would let GWB sodomize him with one the cards. The poster is anti-MS. I don't even recall him mentioning rights or freedoms...

    9. Re:fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, you're willing to get arrested if it's implemented, but what are you willing to do to stop it before then?

      That's the question everyone here needs to be asking themselves.

    10. Re:fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its more of a matter of principle

    11. Re:fuck off by jbplou · · Score: 1

      .NET is a managed lanuage envirnment, if the developed application is insecure it will be because of poor design not .NET. Currently .NET is the most powerful environment around, the only other choice is JAVA but since most newer government servers run Windows why not use .NET.

    12. Re:fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. We better start stocking up on guns and ammo.

    13. Re:fuck off by afabbro · · Score: 1
      Simplely put, the government can fuck off. I will downright refuse to use ANYTHING built on microsoft technology which is this important. If all my personal data is being kept on it then I DEMAND security above and beyond anything MS has ever done.

      Oooooh. I was going to ignore you, but since you used all-capitals words, I knew you were not a man to be trifled with.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    14. Re:fuck off by inKubus · · Score: 1

      That's not to ask, what difference does a name make anyway? What should be important to them is whether or not someone has a gun or a bomb and intends to use it. I don't think knowing someone's name will help fight terrorism. However, it will help the police link people together categorically. As in, this guy here goes to the same McDonald's as this guy here at the same time, so they must be up to something. The real problem is that this information will be farrrrrrr too useful for too many branches of the government and private sector. It will eventually just turn us into pure processors and consumers because they will know everything we want and need before we do and provide it. They will know every bad thing we will do before we even decide to do it and prevent it. The question isn't whether or not we will have an ID card, the question is: what are the rules? Society don't care about carrying an ID card but if there are rules involved that society don't agree with than society will circumvent the system in order to break those rules. The problem with this bill is that it was passed because it got slipped in some shit that no one bothered reading, which means the media didn't pick up on it until it was too late. When shit like that happens, you get scared because it seems like people aren't going to be held accountable for their actions, which means that those who make the law are above the law, which, in the eyes of history, equates to totalitarianism.

      Luckly for us Americans, the framers of the great country wrote this thing called the constitution which provides a three way power regulation. One is the executive branch. One is the legistlative, which was responsible for the underhandedness in the first place. One is the judicial branch which unfortunately is going to be populated with the choices of the executive branch. So really, it's up to the executive branch, the president, GW Bush.

      He used to be an alcoholic before he tried coke and then God told him to be president.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
  28. You can identify people .. so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the point of identifying a person?

    When I was a kid I enrolled in a school run by Jesuits (in a developing country) ..when he was trying to get me in .. my Dad asked them if I needed to show a birth certificate (this isn't a simple deal to get everywhere you know) .. the principal just looks at me and goes .. "Nope, I think I know he was born".

    Mind you the whole point of my enrolling there was cause it was a scholarly and disciplined
    one could study at without getting "caught up". And the didnt seem to worry about identity..

    1. Re:You can identify people .. so what? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      the principal just looks at me and goes .. "Nope, I think I know he was born".

      I guess he just looked for your belly button, so he knew you are not a golem :-)
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  29. Oh man... by kryogen1x · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I'm going to have to get a hotmail passport account!

  30. Lets review by John+Seminal · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The USA starts wars all over the globe.

    Libraries are now requiring finger prints.

    Chicago installed 3000 camera's.

    And now this...

    I just have one question. Did ANYONE read the patriot act?

    What if I want to read a book by Lenin, and not let anyone know that I have read his book? It seems that will be more difficult to do in the future. If I read it at the library, they have my fingerprint scan. If I buy it from the downtown borders, the police camera can look inside to see what books I have. If I somehow sneak the book home, and read it, then want to discuss it on the internet, they can find me.

    This reminds me of Ray Bradbury, only far more sinister, with a splash of Orwell tossed in. My dear God, how dumb is the american populace? Has the smartest 5%, the ones that run the entertainment industries, the news, the companies, has the smartest 5% of the people sold their souls for more money?

    We have all been enslaved.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Lets review by hsmith · · Score: 1

      dumb down teaching standards
      teach american exceptionalism
      teach propaganda
      pass draconian laws
      ???
      profit

    2. Re:Lets review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      ...Has the smartest 5%, the ones that run the entertainment industries, the news, the companies, has the smartest 5% of the people sold their souls for more money?...

      Of course. The degradation of Western society is led by greed, not morals. And the US leads the charge. Freedom? Just a buzzword now. The hippies had it right in the 60s-70s, the corporations are taking over, they saw it for what it was. Every ill Western society suffers is due to greed and avarice.

      Family values? Nonexistant. Why? Western society (read greed) dictates both parents must work, JUST TO PAY THE BILLS. So who's at home with junior, nurturing him/her? No one, or the local day care center, who's responsibility is to make sure these kids behave, but not nurture. Parents have abdicated their responsibility to their children because our greedy society dictates it must be so.

      When are Westerners going to realize that people, and family, are far more important than The Bottom Line? Hope its soon, or humanity on the whole is doomed.

    3. Re:Lets review by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      ??? === Declair yourself Emperor to secure the freedom of the galaxy ,and have all the jedi killed

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    4. Re:Lets review by COredneck · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points, I would mark it insightful ! You hit it straight between the eyes ! I myself have been in corporate America for a quite a few years. I would like to get out. Nice bennies such as vacation but executive management looks down on taking vacation except for their own ranks. The two Columbine gunmen had parents worshipping at the altar of Corporate Society instead of spending time with their kids and knowing what they were up to !

      In my job, we are so spread thin that it is almost impossible to take time off. I had to "pull teeth" just to get a week and a half off. Talking about corporate greed, one company I worked for, the executives were marketers and accountants had an unwritten rule that no one was to take time off during the Summer. That was an "executive privilege". I took time off anyway but always caught crap when I got back such as hearing words of some executive VP was upset I took a week off. This rule was anti-family. The person who favored this rule was a career woman who thought work was more important than family. Similar to Ms. Carly.

    5. Re:Lets review by seann · · Score: 1

      whos this Lenin guy everyone keeps talking about.

      And jesus fucking christ
      I can barely read the god damn text shown in the image.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    6. Re:Lets review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What if I want to read a book by Lenin, and not let anyone know that I have read his book? It seems that will be more difficult to do in the future. If I read it at the library, they have my fingerprint scan. If I buy it from the downtown borders, the police camera can look inside to see what books I have. If I somehow sneak the book home, and read it, then want to discuss it on the internet, they can find me.
      Yes, it does indeed seem like this.

      I think that the only thing we can do to stop it, is to make a fuss of it.

      The only reason that checking out those books somehow implies that you are a threat to national security is that some filtering system flags you for doing so - surely, only a terrorist would read chemistry books? - and that's precisely why no one does it on their own - they stand out like a sore thumb, get flagged and possibly get visits from the FBI (didn't some guy who requested plans for his college get a visit from the feds instead of just a polite "no"?)

      But if thousands of people, all over night, started excercising their rights to do all kinds of "possible terrorist activities" - check out bomb books, buy chemicals, sit in front of a bank or airport and just watch it for hours (what, I can't *watch a building?*), buy electronics, discuss these things on the Internet, and argue with the people trying to stop them that it is their right - then what are they gonna do? Arrest the whole lot?

      I'm not telling anyone to break the law, and I hope my examples aren't illegal, but right now, short of PayPaling together enough money to buy a couple of congressmen, what's gonna save us from getting thrown in jail without a trial because we googled for "bomb"?

      Sure, we'll be flagged in those archives - possibly forever - but our children, and their children, will hopefully never even have to experience the possibility of getting flagged for checking out a book.
    7. Re:Lets review by Tim+C · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Parents have abdicated their responsibility to their children because our greedy society dictates it must be so.

      Hey, no offence, but fuck you. Not all of us have done so; I go to work while my fiancée stays at home to look after our daughter. It's *hard*, we never have enough money, but we do it, because we believe that it's better for her that way.

    8. Re:Lets review by Homology · · Score: 1
      This reminds me of Ray Bradbury, only far more sinister, with a splash of Orwell tossed in.

      Orwell was an optimist.

    9. Re:Lets review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The person who favored this rule was a career woman who thought work was more important than family


      Close but not quite, this woman simply believes that her career is more importnat than your family, not that career is more important in general.

    10. Re:Lets review by arendjr · · Score: 1

      so, obviously he was not talking about you. why act offenced anyway?

    11. Re:Lets review by arendjr · · Score: 1

      how you know?

    12. Re:Lets review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And jesus fucking christ

      Christ's middle name is not "fucking".

      I can barely read the god damn text shown in the image.

      A-fucking-men!

    13. Re:Lets review by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Exactly. What an idiot. I don't get offended if someone makes a remark about obese Americans, because I'm not obese, or if someone makes a remark about Bush-supporting Americans, because I didn't vote for him. Only a fool would take offense when it's obvious that a statement doesn't even apply to him.

  31. Queue blocking by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Something like this could be heavily disrupted by a queue blocking technique. Cause huge backlogs by going down to a registration center, sitting at one of the biometric terminals and refusing to move.

    The biometric readers will be fairly expensive and will require trained operators so there won't be all that many of them at any one registration point.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Queue blocking by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      It's an idea, but you're likely to fall foul of the police for that.

      Of course, that's what civil disobedience is all about...

    2. Re:Queue blocking by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Of course, that's what civil disobedience is all about...

      You mean TERRORISM, right? Because only a TERRORIST would do that when plenty of good Americans just want to get their ID card and get back to work. In America, it's illegal to hold other people up.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
  32. Re:Have a reality check by sillybilly · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sooner or later we'll have some kind of encrypted GUID indentifying us instead of the 9 letter SS number, a GUID that can be applied on the whole planet. Unfortunately privatizing SS is like privatizing the military or the police, or even education and healhcare. I'd rather have some benevolent global gov't issue these numbers than a private corporation, but unfortunately the only forum that ever had a chance to be a "league of nations" or a global gov't is the UN, whose credibility was recently undermined by Bush. I guess the powers that be are fed up that in the UN countries with no military, no resources, or who otherwise would be completely ignored, get a full vote each, simply because they are split into two countries, and outvote the US simply to say look, here we are, give us cash because we have no other way to make some. One whacky solution would be to split the US into 50 states to the US gets 50 votes. The other solution is what Bush is pushing, saying I'm the UN, I'm boss, kiss my ass. Neither one is a good solution, and frankly, the whole point of any global gov't is to stop the risk of a totalitarian global gov't, which means having to listen to those with no power, no voice, instead of just invading them and clubbing them down, even if they are idiots.

  33. I'm in Hell. by platypibri · · Score: 1

    I had long suspected, but now it's confirmed. HP and Microsoft determining if I'm me. I think I'll just post my credit card number on Craig's list.

    --
    Yeah, I guess I'm funny like that.
  34. Second time is the charm? by killjoe · · Score: 0, Troll

    First time MS tried passport Sun objected and quickly put together a powerful alliance of technology and banking companies to propose a competing effort. Although the effort ultimately produced nothing it spread enough doubt to derail passport.

    This time MS is better prepared. They already bought sun for all proactical purposes. With Sun now officially a MS lapdog who will stand in opposition to this venture? Of course the open source community will but they don't own enough politicians to do anything.

    It will be interesting to see if any members of the liberty alliance object to this. My guess is that unless some tech company takes the lead they will simply jump on the MS bandwagon.

    It's amazing what a few billion can buy you these days. MS by dumping a fistfull of dollars into Suns lap got them out of the way and now will be in full control of the identitiy of everybody in the US.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  35. big blow for Sun/Java by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 0, Troll

    What a slap in the face for Sun and Java 5 J2EE 1.5.

    --
    (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
    1. Re:big blow for Sun/Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Java fanbois beating off to everything Java doesn't make parent a troll. Scumbag Scott "Privacy is dead, get over it" McNealy wants us to carry smart ID cards and implant ID chips in our children. Except now the buck-toothed assmaster isn't getting his way in having it all Java-based. Maaajor blow to the buck-toothed assmaster, its overripe organization, its poor employees, and the idiot investors that are still hanging on.

  36. What could possibly go wrong? by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    They make a system just secure enough to track 90% of the users, the avarage mom and pop. They use that data to figure out how much they can get away with... how much patriotic swell there is in redneck america.

    They make the system just insecure enough to let hackers get in, to let disasters strike. They use that as justification for more intrusive forms of government control.

    Is it possible that governments aim here is not to make a system that is unhackable? Maybe they want it to fail, as a prelude to enslavement?

    This is why computers suck. They will no longer be an aide to your life, no longer making life simpler and easier. Computers will now be used to track you, identify you. You are already probably in some government index with a score of how much of a threat you are. Check out Lenin from the library, your score goes up. Join the wrong chats, your score goes up.

    Remember, this is the same government that tapped the phones of the Black Panthers in the 1960's, arrested innocent people, killed innocent people, overthrew the democratically elected president of Chile. Our government stinks with evil.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      Remember, this is the same government that tapped the phones of the Black Panthers in the 1960's, arrested innocent people, killed innocent people, overthrew the democratically elected president of Chile. Our government stinks with evil.

      GWB is in power since the 1960's? :-)
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good one. dork.

    3. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      GWB is in power since the 1960's? :-)

      Not GWB, but a Bush. :-)

      Greed affects all people the same way. Power will currupt. The 3000 square foot house seems small compared with the new 4500 square foot house next door. Yet, somehow, the people in the 1960's seems to live very comfortably and happily in 1000 square foot homes. Power works much in the same way.

      The problem is greed becomes institutionalized within families. A family such as the Bush family, they need power to hide what they have done in the past.

      Will the day come when they will decide being president is not enough? The 10000 square foot house is feeling constricting, more is wanted. What about power? Is the presidence not enough?

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    4. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by slashdotnickname · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh poor Black Panthers. The organization that spawned the majority of gang and drug trade movements that would imprison younger generations into standard of livings much lower than their parents.

      Most of the progress made by the brave pioneers of the 50s and 60s was severly halted by these thugs. Lowlifes that would rally against the "evil white man" while at the same time shitting on their own communities with destructive vices. And yet the parent post want's us to take offense at the government phone tappings.

      Dumbass.

    5. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why computers suck.

      You got me convinced! Everybody do like me: throw out your computers and run for the*&$%Y +++ NO CARRIER

    6. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mean while parent poster's hypothetical score just went up

    7. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > You are already probably in some government index with a score of how much of a threat you are. Check out Lenin from the library, your score goes up. Join the wrong chats, your score goes up.

      What if you're reading obscure political philosophers to join them, rather than to oppose them?

      (Aaw hell, who am I kidding. Been reading Strauss and deliberately misreading Nietzche for half my friggin' life, buried my $3125 in the back yard, and I still haven't been recruited :)

  37. Like it ot not, by melted · · Score: 0, Troll

    .NET is the most advanced RAD environment on the market today. It's a joy to program in, and it's so well designed that in 99.5% of cases you don't even need documentation. Things are just done the way they should be done. .NET is also standardized with open, publicly available specification available to anyone. Whidbey release gets even more things right (generics, partial classes, nullable types, etc.)

    The only downside is that .NET only runs on Windows. I know about Mono, but it's not quite there yet, and my guess is it'll always be at least one year behind and not ready for deployment.

    1. Re:Like it ot not, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " .NET is the most advanced RAD environment on the market today. "

      Only for clueless fucking newbie programmers. The real advanced programmers will use C/C++, and a decent scripting langauge. Get a fucking clue please.

      Microsoft's .NET compiler, mono, etc, etc java, etc virtual machine, etc implementations are _NOT_ good at speed. They suck at numerical computation, and are deifnitely slower than C/C++, please go learn how to program, and stop being a fucking clueless CS stupid(99.5% of CS stupids). Opps I mean student. Please stop larting your load of crap on people, and learn how to program correctly, kthnx.

      You're a dumbass if C++ actually bothers you.

    2. Re:Like it ot not, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only for clueless fucking newbie programmers. The real advanced programmers will use C/C++, and a decent scripting langauge. Get a fucking clue please.

      right, because it's more important to write boilerplate plumbing code and do precise memory management than, say, focus almost exclusively on writing code that deals with the problem domain

      there's a reason that major corporations are writing most of their new systems in java and c#

      still pining for the mid-90s? fucking amateur

    3. Re:Like it ot not, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real advanced programmers will use C/C++
      Only if they like debugging obscure pointer errors and working on legacy applications. All of my clients who use MS tools have/are migrating to .Net.

      please go learn how to program, and stop being a fucking clueless CS stupid ... opps I mean student
      I have a degree in computer engineering, not CS and my code is used at organizations such as the CIA, Autodesk, GE, and other NYSE traded companies, as well as in my own commercial products that have earned me a very comfortable lifestyle :).

      They suck at numerical computation, and are deifnitely slower than C/C++,
      I benchmarked this for a client on their reservoir simulation application ($100k-500k per license): C# code is just as fast as C++ code with overflow and array checking turned on. They are now migrating to C# from C++.

      You're a dumbass if C++ actually bothers you.
      C++ was a tool created in the 80's and that I used throughout the 90's, but generally speaking its time is over. Managed code is the future. Who is the dumbass?

    4. Re:Like it ot not, by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      .NET is the most advanced RAD environment on the market today

      Get a f*cking clue, like it or not, .net is _not_ an rad environment. Secondly, NET is also standardized with open, publicly available specification - there's nothing wrong with this: the problem is MS implementing a secure nation-wide id system... hell, I'd feel safer in the jungle amongst mad tigers.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    5. Re:Like it ot not, by suezz · · Score: 1

      you are clueless - java and .net do not scale very well - you need tons of hardware - but that just may be my experience.

      most advanced RAD environment is such a blanket statement and a very personal opinion. I have worked with .net and java for the past six months or so and I much prefer perl and python - but again that may be just me - I can produce much faster in perl/python than I can in .net or java and I feel I have more control over what I want to do. So for me it isn't the most advanced RAD envrionment. And best of all it is free of any kind of license restrictions or secret nda's and will run on any free os so startup costs are basically nill.
      All that advancenss you talk about takes more costs to get up and running.

      This article is nothing but fluff and pr - it really doesn't say a whole lot but make a whole bunch of so called IT managers want to buy their crap.

      I swear I think articles like are put just as fishing bait - just to see what IT managers will bite and buy.

    6. Re:Like it ot not, by analog_line · · Score: 4, Insightful

      .NET is the most advanced RAD environment on the market today.

      What kind of complete moron uses "Rapid Application Development" to implement something as dangerous as a national ID system?

    7. Re:Like it ot not, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd really like to see your benchmarks, and which C++ compilers you used them against. You are being a dumb ass because you didn't even mention which C++ runtime you were running against. The Microsoft C++ runtime runs like bloated crap. Intel is much better, and also Metrowerks. Get a life and use real results asshole. C/C++ will _always_ be faster and less of a memory hog than .NET runtime.

      simple console C++ program == 5k
      simple console C# program == 10-15 Megs
      clusi 9410 0.1 0.3 4924 1800 pts/3 Sl+ 16:22 0:00 ./testapp
      clusi 9393 0.8 0.7 14940 3868 pts/3 Sl+ 16:37 0:00 /usr/bin/cli ./test.exe

      Ding Ding, we have a winner!

      mono takes much more memory, and I know the .NET implementation takes even more for the libraries it uses loaded by default.

      Arguing C++ is last decade has to be made by a clueless new programmer which is in his teens. Please go research, and go to college, since your fucking clueless on the matter.

      I've a friend who said the same(C# being faster), and he drowned in his own statement. He made a huge opengl game in C#, and later choked because the mathematical calculations were really slow. You have no authority on this matter, nor anyone else on /., so say C# is faster. Don't make stupid comments unless you've tried it first.

    8. Re:Like it ot not, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      simple console C++ program == 5k
      simple console C# program == 10-15 Megs
      clusi 9410 0.1 0.3 4924 1800 pts/3 Sl+ 16:22 0:00 ./testapp
      clusi 9393 0.8 0.7 14940 3868 pts/3 Sl+ 16:37 0:00 /usr/bin/cli ./test.exe

      Ding Ding, we have a winner!


      wow, i guess you're pretty unfamiliar with shared libraries

      Please go research, and go to college, since your fucking clueless on the matter.

      maybe i've been to college, and maybe i have a degree in computer science, and maybe i don't fuck up basic grammar like misusing the word 'your'

      Get a life and use real results asshole. C/C++ will _always_ be faster and less of a memory hog than .NET runtime.

      in most cases, definitely. however, hand-optimized assembly will beat the shit out of C. would any sane person write a large app today in straight x86? absolutely not - that's ridiculous. when you spend most of your time worrying about memory management and writing tons of code just to get basic functionality, you should probably stop using to-the-metal languages and start using C#/Java/other managed languages [unless you're, say, writing an operating system]

    9. Re:Like it ot not, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "wow, i guess you're pretty unfamiliar with shared libraries"

      Yes, "shared memory" has been around for years. I believe you have a misunderstanding of how the memory works. You load the program, it takes 15 megs, you load the same program and it will use the shared code in the 15 megs(if any). The first number would be the VmSize, the ram, libraries, etc. Since you are acting clueless on this one. Theres also the Resident memory, which is in the RAM installed on the compute. Theres the data size, the stack, the exe size. Most of this information can be found in a newbie CS book. You might want to start reading that never-read book on your shelf. I'll clue you in, a program shouldn't need to use 14 Megs of any code usage. Mono/and MS's .net runtime uses 3 times as much memory for the requirements. Its stupid and insane.

      When using a limited system or a micro device, one shouldn't need to install tons of memory/disk memory for the program to work. A simple C++ program will do since the requirements are limited.

      You've the same attitude which has infected the other CS stupids. "Since computers are getting faster, we shouldn't worry what programs need as long as the program runs." This type of attitude is what makes a bad programmer.

      "when you spend most of your time worrying about memory management and writing tons of code just to get basic functionality, you should probably stop using to-the-metal languages and start using C#/Java/other managed languages [unless you're, say, writing an operating system]"

      you are aware C++ can have a garbage collection, or are you just acting like an ignorant bastard?
      Ever heard of boehm-gc, or perhaps dmalloc? Geez, you seem to be really clueless. Best you go back to college and perform some interactive research. Books aren't everything buddy. Experience, experience, experience.

      Functionality eh? /me looks at the KDE project. Seems they've implemented tons of functionality in C++ very quickly, exactly where are you getting your false data?

      C++ console app
      VmSize 4924 kB
      VmLck 0 kB
      VmRSS 1800 kB
      VmData 212 kB
      VmStk 84 kB
      VmExe 4 kB
      VmLib 4244 kB
      VmPTE 20 kB

      C# mono app
      VmSize 14940 kB
      VmLck 0 kB
      VmRSS 3868 kB
      VmData 2780 kB
      VmStk 84 kB
      VmExe 1384 kB
      VmLib 3628 kB
      VmPTE 32 kB
      Threads 3

      This carifies much better. I can see VM implementations are pure bullshut, if I started a thread in the C# program, it would most likely bloat in memory, thread usage, and speed just like all the other VMs out ther.

      This was just a simple console application, I've used large applications which were made by java, and it was the largest bloat of shit I've ever seen.

    10. Re:Like it ot not, by pebs · · Score: 1

      .NET is the most advanced RAD environment on the market today. It's a joy to program in, and it's so well designed that in 99.5% of cases you don't even need documentation. Things are just done the way they should be done. .NET is also standardized with open, publicly available specification available to anyone. Whidbey release gets even more things right (generics, partial classes, nullable types, etc.)

      The only downside is that .NET only runs on Windows. I know about Mono, but it's not quite there yet, and my guess is it'll always be at least one year behind and not ready for deployment.


      You have got to be fucking kidding. Microsoft .Net 1.1 and Visual Studio .Net 2003 is total garbage. With the new release (2005 or will it be 2006), it might actually start to be usable. What kind of moron designs a language (even a 1.0 version) without nullable types? It's as if the language was not designed to be used with databases. I know there are 3rd party libraries to correct this, and I've used them in my projects, but really this should have been supported out-of-box.

      Then there is Windows.Forms. If you used it, you probably know how much of a piece of crap it is. No ability to do input masks on textboxes (corrected in 2.0, which isn't here yet), and all kinds of weird issues like keyboard and mouse controls for a treeview not working well together. It's as if they expect you to resort to writing Win32 libraries instead of using pure .Net. Those are just two examples, I'm sure there's more.

      It's typical of Microsoft to put out a half-assed product and hype it up. It's sad that all the PHB's thought it was a usable system and have pushed for using it in projects.

      Take a good look at what's going on the Java world, especially in open source. .Net has a lot of catching up to do. All the interesting stuff in .Net is basically just re-write's of Java projects in C#, and they are only the very beginnings.

      --
      #!/
    11. Re:Like it ot not, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you didn't even mention which C++ runtime you were running against
      MSVC 6.0 using MSVCRT.DLL (like 99% of all MS dev shops), with all compiler checks enabled yields numeric performance as C# - and why wouldn't it, in the end the same x86 math instructions are performed. The difference is that C++ allows overflow+array checking to be turned off albeit at the cost of safety.

      C++ is last decade has to be made by a clueless new programmer
      Dude, I have professionally coded using C++ since 1990, but for the past 3 years the MS dev market for new projects has clearly shifted to .Net languages.

      Please go research, and go to college
      Sorry, I'm too busy consulting for top dollars.

      I've a friend who said ... huge opengl game in C#
      I'll match your anecdote with my own: I personally have written a C# app that uses OpenGL and renders 200k+ polygons per scene, which is good enough for my purposes.

      You are being a dumb ass ... asshole ... since your fucking clueless ... You have no authority
      Wow. Your words convey so much repression, inadequacy, anger, and frustration. You really need to get laid and learn to use a spelling/grammar checker before you go Columbine.

      Peace

  38. hrm by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that if I have a digital ID, and someone spoofs it, that if it says I went to another country and I didnt, that my word wouldn't be enough against the transaction log of such a device?

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    1. Re:hrm by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

      Machines don't lie - so therefor you must be lying.
      Is that not logic?

  39. .NET???!!! by drwav · · Score: 1

    Why aren't they using Ada like every other IMPORTANT goverment project?!

    At least Ada actually IS a proven technology.

    1. Re:.NET???!!! by magerquark.de · · Score: 1

      Maybe they use ADA.NET like this here: http://www.usafa.af.mil/df/dfcs/bios/mcc_html/a_sh arp.cfm

      --
      -- Watch me working: www.magerquark.de
    2. Re:.NET???!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can use A#

  40. A few corrections to the quote in TFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "The need to securely identify people moving across national and international borders has never been more important than it is today." No, let me phrase this in a more precise way: "The world security situation isn't really any different than it has been for the past thirty years, but now we finally have the political will to build systems to give us more control over people's lives. People are now willing to give up more of their freedom for perceived security, and we're going to take the opportunity to do it. But once we do it, it will be too late to ever undo it because if there's ever a movement to undo it, we'll put them on no-fly lists, we'll tap their communications and use that information to discredit their organizations, and finally there's now a bill to make it so that people who are on the secret no-fly-list can't buy guns, so we can disarm them too, without any judicial process."

    Is that more clear?

    1. Re:A few corrections to the quote in TFT by mike_the_kid · · Score: 1
      The world security situation isn't really any different than it has been for the past thirty years, but now we finally have the political will to build systems to give us more control over people's lives. People are now willing to give up more of their freedom for perceived security, and we're going to take the opportunity to do it.


      I think this hit the nail on the head.

      The rest of it makes it seem like there is a definite malice behind the initiative. I do not see it that way. This is a multi-billion dollar deal. There are people who stand to make a lot of money if they get this contract. Potentially hundreds of millions of dollars. They're going to do everything they can to push it through.

      And damn the costs, the big picture, or the correctness of such a project. This is someone's shot at the big money. On the government side, its just beauracrats who think their job is to spend money and listen to presentations from corporate big-shots.

      Then there's the electorate. Unfortunately, half of the population has below average intelligence.
      --
      Troll Like a Champion Today
    2. Re:A few corrections to the quote in TFT by antiMStroll · · Score: 1
      "The need to securely identify people moving across national and international borders..."

      In other words proof of citizenship required for interstate travel. Papers please.

    3. Re:A few corrections to the quote in TFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if the majority of people were on the no-fly list? ... Of course that won't happen naturally and it won't be tomorrow when the majority would willingly put themselves on the list. But it will happen in a decade or two, when the people will realize where their complacency has gotten them and what today's media is all about.

  41. OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    This is so wrong, on so many levels.

    It presumes security based on Windows. Didn't Passport already fail, doesn't MS learn from past mistakes?!?

    It presumes HP will be at the center of it.

    And it presumes on a platform that isn't platform agnostic.

    Fucking greed again at work.

  42. Competing police state measures I see by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    So on the one hand we have this and on the other implanted RFID chips.

    Those of you who in other news replies felt that merely having encryption and using anonymous e-mail and network services equals having something to hide, please refrain from commenting against this now. If you have nothing to hide, you won't mind be tracked everywhere you go and in everything you do, because... you have nothing to hide, right?

    Please ready your papers, citizens.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  43. Obligitary Blue Screen Comment by JCY2K · · Score: 1

    The only problem with this plan is that a blue screen could hold up the border for hours...

  44. Yes, and worse, they can have you killed by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So if someone exploits a security hole in .NET they can take my identity?

    If we have a system where everyone is tracked, through databases, camera's, RFID in cars, fingerprints in libraries, and a future dna database, think about the abuse?

    Someone hacks the government servers, and puts in data, data that says you are a terrorist, a dangerous terrorist with knowledge of how to build bombs.

    You, of course, are just an avarage joe who is walking to the local park to read Invisible Man. Next thing you know, a van hits you on the sidewalk, and you're dead. The driver is not just some old man who lost control. He is an old man who appears to have lost control.

    I can't help but wonder, if Joe Mccarthy was alive, if Bush would nominate him to be Director of Homeland Security? The technology we have today is what he was missing to acomplish his goals. If he had todays technology, he could have killed the people who complained, before they got organized. Just find out who is reading the "banned" books, and execute them. Of course, the USA will never pull a book off a library shelf. They will just monitor who reads it.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Yes, and worse, they can have you killed by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      Like in "The Net" with Sandra Bullock

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    2. Re:Yes, and worse, they can have you killed by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Someone hacks the government servers, and puts in data, data that says you are a terrorist, a dangerous terrorist with knowledge of how to build bombs.

      You, of course, are just an avarage joe...


      The danger is not to the average Joe (maybe the average Joe for whom a hacker has a grudge perhaps) but the real danger is to those people who are considered a threat by those who officially/legally control the database.

      It is far more likely that we will see such a database used to harass the political opposition (we've seen plenty of anecdotal evidence of that with the no-fly list already). We are also likely to see it used to benefit the "friends" (aka campaign contributors) of the database controllers - corporate whistleblowers for example.

      A national ID system is one of the most un-American things to arise from the 9-11 kneejerkers. The only possible benefit is that it will catch stupid terrorists - the ones not smart enough to buy a counterfeit ID or bribe the right underpaid clerk. Meanwhile it is a huge sacrifice of freedom (you know, one of those principles this country was founded on) that will lead to further centralization of power, increased corruption and of course a huge tax bill to pay for the boondoggle.
      "I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed.
      The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general --
      into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
      -- Osama bin Laden, Oct 21, 2001.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Yes, and worse, they can have you killed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't help but wonder, if Joe Mccarthy was alive, if Bush would nominate him to be Director of Homeland Security?

      Don't wonder. You know. Large swaths of the modern conservative movement have already, in the real non-hypothetical world, been trying to whitewash McCarthy and repaint him as an honest hero who was right about everything and who was only discredited because of a smear campaign by the evil Liberals, who did this because they hated America and wanted the Communists to destroy it. Have you ever heard of a little book called "Treason", by Anne Coulter? Because that's basically its thesis. Meanwhile, the Bush administration has shown no qualms about working with and drawing on as resources thoroughly discredited individuals from the foreign policy scandals of the 1980s (you know, the scandals that helped create the current foreign policy mess in the middle east that Bush is ostensibly trying to fight), and have even been violently trying to spin Vietnam as a war where our mistake was in leaving, not in going in.

      This administration and this movement are, quite outside of straw men, very enthusiastic about trying to rewrite history so that anyone in America who's ever tried to engineer jingoistic hatred for personal political gain, or start or participate in a war on false pretenses, was in the right. If McCarthy were still alive the media would have been browbeaten by now into treating him as an American hero.

    4. Re:Yes, and worse, they can have you killed by rpresser · · Score: 1

      A national ID system is one of the most un-American things to arise from the 9-11 kneejerkers.

      Maybe it's time we give up on the adjective "American" in this sense. Apparently most of the things that used to be called "un-American" are now being put forward as the proper American way of thinking. Not to put too fine a point on it, which is more American -- a pioneer family crossing the prairie in a covered wagon, or thousands of families zoning out in unison in front of the TV showing American Idol?

    5. Re:Yes, and worse, they can have you killed by smchris · · Score: 1

      You, of course, are just an avarage joe who is walking to the local park to read Invisible Man. Next thing you know, a van hits you on the sidewalk, and you're dead. The driver is not just some old man who lost control. He is an old man who appears to have lost control.

      What a fantastic "Brazil"-like plot for a movie! (Being the hit person, that is.)

      "Oh, I hate going into houses as the meter reader. You never know what you'll find in those basements! it's going to make me late for a 7:15 hit-and-run and I'm already 10 points to the bad in my weekly review."

      What the heck. Join the Neocon party, go to Canada or die laughing, I guess.

  45. Who pays? by John+Seminal · · Score: 1

    Explain to me exactly how they got me to fund a system that is detrimental to my freedom?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Who pays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a goddamn paranoid moron. This is in no way detrimental to your freedom. Pull your head out of your government-fearing ass and see that.

    2. Re:Who pays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, smart ass, what exactly is the purpose of this?

    3. Re:Who pays? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Informative
      Explain to me exactly how they got me to fund a system that is detrimental to my freedom?

      The Real ID Act was cleverly attached by its author, Rep. Sensenbrenner (R-WI), as a rider to a completely unrelated appropriations measure for troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Since voting against appropriations for troops is unAmerican, the bill along with its Orwellian rider passed easily (House 368-58, Senate 100-0).

      Note that the rider specifies no funding. The federal ID card is left as an unfunded mandate for states to implement on their own budgets, with the usual extraconstitutional trick of threatening to withhold federal highway funds from states that fail to enact supporting state legislation. In practical terms, aside from being a fascistic federal power grab, this is a really expensive measure for the states. Unfortunately Real ID enjoys some myopic political support because it will stick it to illegal aliens. (And anyone seeking asylum, political or otherwise.) People don't realize the larger implications of a national ID card that one is forced to carry, and we just got them with hardly any public debate at all:

      House Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) originally introduced the bill as part of the House's intelligence community reform package in late 2004. When opposition to the provisions in the Senate threatened to kill that bill, the provisions were dropped, but the House leadership agreed to reattach them "to the first piece of legislation this session that both chambers were expected to pass" [Los Angeles Times, 1/27/05]. The Real ID Act was reintroduced in 2005 and passed the House, but apparently recognizing that the stand-alone bill lacked support in the Senate, the House leadership attached the legislation to the House version of the emergency funding bill. The Senate version did not include the measure. With bipartisan support, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduced an amendment expressing the sense of the Senate that the provisions should not be in the final bill, but the amendment was ruled "non-germane" and denied a vote. Most of the Real ID provisions in the House's version survived the House-Senate conference committee and were part of the conference report that passed the House and Senate.

      During the Senate debate on the final version of the bill, several senators voiced opposition to the inclusion of the Real ID provisions in the conference report, but this opposition was not reflected in the final vote of 100-0. Here are some excerpts from the debate:

      * Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN): "That does not stop me from objecting and expressing my disappointment to two provisions in the bill. One is the so-called Real ID Act. Actually, unlike a lot of legislation we pass here, this is well named. This really is a national identification card for the United States of America for the first time in our history. We have never done this before, and we should not be doing it without a full debate. This Real ID provision turns 190 million driver's licenses, which are now ineffective ID cards, into more effective national identification cards. To add insult to injury, we have also slapped state governments with the bill for them. I strongly object to this. When I was governor of Tennessee, I vetoed our state ID card twice because I thought it was an infringement on civil liberties. I thought that driver's licenses are for driving. If we need an ID card, we should have an ID card."
      * Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-RI): There are many concerns I have with Real ID in addition to the process used to bring it to the floor. First, the measure is an unfunded mandate to the states. Furthermore, unless every state complies, the federal government will have to mandate the creation of a national ID. Between the creation of a new database and approval system, training for DMV workers, and struggling state budgets, Real

    4. Re:Who pays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one shall disparage the glorious name of big government. It deeply offends the socialist majority here.

  46. Yeah, okay... by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1
    "The need to securely identify people moving across national and international borders has never been more important than it is today,"


    Yeah, except to Hitler, he seemed pretty adamant about tracking where the Jews came and went.
  47. Bit ironic... by lxt · · Score: 1

    ...that this comes after the spoof "GPS Tags in Clothes" story - I got slightly confused between which one was actually fake :)

  48. BOYCOTT HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP is a Microsoft sycophant.

    1. Re:boycott HP by kalislashdot · · Score: 1

      Their printers are the only printers I will buy. If not only for the way the paper loads, in a tray in front. All other printers suck ass. Otherwise I could give a rat's ass about HP. I know there computers are funky.

  49. no thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i will pack up some camping gear and a hunting rifle & fishing gear and head for the northwest wilderness and live like a mountian hillbilly before accepting such nonsense...

  50. When you do others wrong... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ... wouldn't you like to track them, for at least your own security, if not to do them more wrong?

  51. So now it's... by erveek · · Score: 1

    The Blue Screen of Deportation?

    --
    -- This void intentionally left null.
  52. Historical Analysis by digitalgimpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lets See:

    Hitler needed an ID system. IBM was the ideal partner for them during the Holocaust. Perfect for tracking victims.

    Bush needs and ID system. HP is the ideal partner for them during the Crusades 2.0. Perfect for tracking non christians.

    history does always repeat itself.... sadly.

  53. If only I had mod points, i would by bobroberts · · Score: 1

    Mod parent UP!

    --
    // // Never underestimate the power of human stupidity. // //
  54. Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Considering that Oracle said they'd donate the software to the
    feds for free for a national ID system, you have to wonder what Microsoft's price was. Clearly there's some payoff; but my bet is that it's to some special interests (individuals, or the states of specific lobbiests) and the taxpayer'll get screwed.

    1. Re:Oracle by team99parody · · Score: 1
      Here is a direct link to Oracle saying the software'll be free to the feds.

      Perhaps Microsoft technologies are just more scalable and secure than Oracle, so that's why they cost more?

    2. Re:Oracle by fsterman · · Score: 1

      This isn't a troll, no way.

      --
      Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
    3. Re:Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was actually a shot at a "funny" for the MSFT secure comment or an Informative for the Oracle ID card project link.

  55. what a relief! by toby · · Score: 1
    There is a truism, I'm not sure what the source is, that we are safe so long as we have an incompetent government and/or police force. If they're betting the farm on .NET, we have relatively little to fear. If they start doing things properly, get very worried.

    But seriously. National ID? What part of 1984 don't you guys understand? That book was even part of our school curriculum...

    --
    you had me at #!
  56. I won't be having an ID card.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..especially not from M$. You got to be joking. Go fuck yourself M$, go fuck yourself UK and US government. Stick your Orwellian Bush led empire up your fat repulsive arses.

    The governments are no longer the representatives of the people. They seem to be the enemy

  57. As a criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an international criminal, I am very happy to hear that Microsoft is developing this solution.

  58. Anyone see that movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It all starts with someone in the senate they then scheme to build a clone army in secret, this case its an ID server and its microsoft. Then they give the clone army to the "good" guys, this case the government. Only to find out later that the clone army belongs to the person who schemed to build it, this case microsoft.

    What would happen next; ponders me.

  59. The pie will not be big. by team99parody · · Score: 1

    Oracle already announced their competitive bid for this project. How big a pie can it be considering Oracle's price?

  60. This is great by Doros · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is an P2P identity-swapping scene. I can be anybody!

  61. Consequences... by moviepig.com · · Score: 1
    If we outlaw anonymity, then only outlaws will have amnesia.

    Incognito ergo sum. - Descartes

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
  62. "Good afternoon..." by rhu · · Score: 1

    ...welcome to National Identity System customer service. My name is Ravi -- I mean 'Jim'. How it is I can be of helpful to you this fine morning?"

    "I can't get past security."

    "Have you tried to be re-installing your identity?"

    1. Re:"Good afternoon..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is hilarious. Someone please mod parent up.

  63. Good luck. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    You wont get arrested for refusing to carry the approved ID.

    You will get detained once... And if you tell them to "FO" while in detention, you can be assured it wont happen again as you wont get released.

    Legal? no.. but when you cant even call an attorney there isnt much you can do.

    Even if they do release you eventually, they can still ruin you. No job, no credit, no house, no driving..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  64. open source doesn't always stand for an open mind by steven.hillaert · · Score: 1

    Did the people who are bashing about .net ever really worked with .net? Security depends on the people that create the architecture and the application. In some technologies this might be an easier task than in an other but it's always possible to create secure applications. Clearly open source doesn't always stand for an open mind.

  65. Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We get to find out who is moving where. Ever wanted to find out when the very wealthy are leaving the states? Want to know where they are moving to? now is the chance.

  66. What's so bad about this? by DigitlDud · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article cites several countries where the .NET identity solution by HP is already in use. Obviously there has been no news about any security problems with these systems. You should be far more worried about simply losing your wallet than this system getting hacked.

    1. Re:What's so bad about this? by trucker3406e · · Score: 1

      Has everyone lost site of the real issue??? I seems american ideals died at the WTC adn the terrorists have already won? Doesnt anyone know what the consitution and bill of rights says?? A nation ID system is in complete and utter violation of thoses!!!

    2. Re:What's so bad about this? by DigitlDud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly what does it violate? The bill of rights doesn't say anything about a right to privacy. It comes down to what is in the majority interests of Americans. I'm sure most would agree a national ID is worth it for a more secure nation. We already have social security IDs, this is more of a 21st century version.

    3. Re:What's so bad about this? by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      Your fuckin cracked.

      Social Security ID's were never a "tracking" device. They are meant to make sure you pay your 12.5% into the system no matter what job you hold and to make sure employers are honest. Nothing about that system has a goddamn thing to do with security.

      Going even a step farther, who is going to maintain the DB with over 300 million entries ?? The government ? Christ it takes 6-8 weeks to get a drivers license in most states, how long do you think this is going to take ? Wanna leave state ? Catch a flight ? 3 month wait while they "process" your request.

      Now assume they figure out having the gov't handle this would be to expensive so they do what ... hand it off to contractors. So now you have some 30k/year asswipe frat boy CIA reject handling the most important data of your life. Fun.

      So explain to me how this is going to make us secure. I can already tell you that there are going to be so many holes in this system and so much bloat and crashes galore that many places will just do a visual check of the ID, exactly like they do with drivers licenses, the majority of which have stripes or barcodes on them that are never used. Even more important, explain to me how allowing the airline desk jockey to access this info is secure ? Or any number of different people who are expected to have access to this information ? You think they are not bribable ?

      Most people who know anything about this are appalled. The general public has heard nothing of this. The few in the "mainstream" that have heard of this have heard complete horsecrap about how everything will be smooth running and flawless, and how its going to be impossible to fake. Right. Just like the new money was impossible to fake.

      The only way to implement this in a "safe and secure" manner is going to cost far far more than its worth. You would have to have a fully private (No internet, or internet2) network with fully trained and top secret clearanced clerks accessing the information. Full redundancy on the backend. Triple check authentication at a minimum in order to access the DB. You would also have to hold so much information on the people in question (AKA the citizens) that this DB would probably have to be the largest in existance.

      Using a RAD environment with normal coders and normal hardware, and inevitably the normal internet to develop and access this information has to be the most insecure method I can think of. This is a complete pigfuck. This is not about protecting me or you from terrorists, its about allowing the government to track us for any number of (profitable and power securing) reasons.

      The terrorists are jealous of this system. They wish they had the power in their homelands to implement something like this so they could track infidels and anyone who would fight them for their freedom. It makes being a power monger a lot easier when you know everything about your enemy/opponent/voter/consumer.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    4. Re:What's so bad about this? by CHR1S · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not surprised to hear this coming from DigtlDug since he is now working for Microsoft according to his blog.

      Seriously, just because you work for a company does not mean that you have to be blind to the security issues that do and may exist in a particular product.

    5. Re:What's so bad about this? by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      Doesnt anyone know what the consitution and bill of rights says?? A nation ID system is in complete and utter violation of thoses!!!

      I know those doucuments pretty well, pal. Since you seem to think you have such a firm grasp on them, why don't YOU quote the text from the Constitution or BOR you think this would violate.

      Just because it's a bad/stupid/pointless idea, doesn't mean it's unconstitutional.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    6. Re:What's so bad about this? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Go ahead then, list the security issues that have been found in .NET and IIS 6.

      The guy may work for MS, but he has a point. If this actually has been deployed, and is as insecure as some posters here are opining, why hasn't it been hacked yet?

      I'm not saying it's perfect, but it's also nowhere near as bad as even some of the +5 comments are making it out to be. (All with no evidence, of course)

    7. Re:What's so bad about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If this actually has been deployed, and is as insecure as some posters here are opining, why hasn't it been hacked yet?

      How do we know it hasn't been?

    8. Re:What's so bad about this? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Just because it's a bad/stupid/pointless idea, doesn't mean it's unconstitutional.

      Since you know it so well can you point out where in the Constitution of the uSA it says government can do this? Afterall it puts limits on what government can do, it specifically enumerates the powers granted to government.

      Falcon
    9. Re:What's so bad about this? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Er, because the hackers have more than two brain cells to knock together, and aren't saying anything?

      Go read about the bombing of Coventry in World War II for a lesson on this type of shenanigan.

      Nowhere near as bad? You mean, it won't work, it will cost billions, and it infringes my Fourth Amendment rights, it's not so bad?

      Fuck it. I'll just take my soma and surrender.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    10. Re:What's so bad about this? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."

      That's a right to privacy. Amendment IV. Yes, trawling through data about me is an unreasonable search.

      She social security number is the single most abused piece of personal information ever. You need to come up with a better example.

      Do you, or do you not, work for the company that is profiting from this program? I want to get that right out in the open here.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:What's so bad about this? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Seems to me like the Fourth Amendment pretty well handles right to privacy. Seems to me like the Supreme Court agrees with me, according to the decisions linked elsewhere in this thread.

      The government has zero legitimate powers that are not specified in the Constitution. Of course, that does exclude just about every law passed in the last 100 years (with a few conspicuous exceptions), but in terms of Constitutional legitimacy, this policy blows.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    12. Re:What's so bad about this? by trucker3406e · · Score: 1

      I already know what it says ... PAL. And it does NOT say that the Govt has the Right to track me in ANY way. A republic is about freedom of the individual not the "saftey and security" of a whole. And if it claims that it can provide thatr "saftey and security" they've already lied to you just so they can get more control over you. No govt can make "us" safe with taking our rights to do it. Its nothing more then a ploy from them to gain more power over us. Im astonished that no one can see this.

  67. The minority rules OK! by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the UK, the Labour party just got reelected with only 36% of the vote. Yup. That's a minority. Almost 2/3 of the population didn't want them in power.

    Step 1: So, the first thing you do in a "democracy" to reduce individual liberty *and* get them to pay for it is take advantage of a medieval electoral system which gives a 1/3 minority an absolute majority in the parliament.

    Step 2: Then you use that parliamentary majority to push just about any legislation you like through the house.

    Step 3: Profit!

    Good eh?

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:The minority rules OK! by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      n the UK, the Labour party just got reelected with only 36% of the vote. Yup. That's a minority. Almost 2/3 of the population didn't want them in power.

      With a turnout of 61%, as well as the 2/3 of voters who actively did not want New Labour back in, there is also the one third who were not moved strongly enough to make any preference.

      Funny how the Conservatives (now that they are not in power) are coming round to the proportional representation idea (they were dead against it when they were in power; now Labour is against it. Plus ca change)

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    2. Re:The minority rules OK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with parliamentary democracy is not how politicians are elected at all. The problem is well, parliamentary democracy. Proportional representation will not change the fact that the ruling party operates what is essentially a dictatatorship. Every single bill put before parliament by the government HAS to pass or an election is called. To me that sounds a lot like a dictatorship.

    3. Re:The minority rules OK! by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      In the UK, the Labour party just got reelected with only 36% of the vote. Yup. That's a minority. Almost 2/3 of the population didn't want them in power.

      So, which is better:

      A) 4 or 5 candidates, one of which is close to exactly what you would want in a candidate, but, when is elected, represents a minority of the population, (what you describe in the UK) or

      B) 2 candidates, neither of which is what you want in a candidate, but you end up voting for one of them, because there's no point in not voting for one or the other, and even though they both suck, you vote for the one that sucks less... (the good ol' USA)

      I like the UK way better, myself. I voted for Kerry and Gore, not because I liked either one, but because I disliked Bush more.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    4. Re:The minority rules OK! by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Informative
      In the UK, the Labour party just got reelected with only 36% of the vote. Yup. That's a minority.

      50% of the vote has no significance in country with more than 2 parties. No party has won a UK election with more that 50% of the vote since 1931. Criticising this particular government for not having a majority of the vote thus makes no sense.

    5. Re:The minority rules OK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stand to be corrected, but:

      In America, this could easily happen. You have something called the Electoral College (SP ?).
      What this in effect means is that while you think you are voting for someone (e.g. Brush) you are ACTUALLY voting for someone whom you think (because the party they represent beleive they will) will vote for Brush. In fact, these members of the eloctoral college, can vote for whomever they like, be it Brush or Stick. In SOME (read 3 or 4) states there's a penalty for not actually voting for the person that your party wants you to vote for.

      All it takes is some bribary of the members of this electoral college for democracy to go out the window.

      go to www.howstuffworks.com and read about the electoral college (or how Bush could win with a minority vote.)

      Of course, we all know democracy is really a myth ;)

  68. closing bases, useless cards by michaelbuddy · · Score: 1

    This is just a horrid misuse of funds. Bush wants to close military bases distributed around the US that might be a real source of security if say an aircraft were to be commadeered by a terrorist.. but getting that national ID which can be hotswapped out with a person who looks like you, is really safe.

    We knew who the terrorists were who hijacked the planes... did it make any difference?

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

  69. Ob. Star Wars Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

  70. Sky.NET by George+Tirebuyer · · Score: 1

    Sarah Conner...paging Sarah Conner....

  71. Nothing new... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
    Some countries has already been using national ID:s for decades... The catch is the system behind the ID:s and the management of such systems.

    Considering that the M$ environment is under constant pressure from various threats I would like to call the selection of that environment risky, and almost stupid. By selecting other environments you would be running the risk of being more dependent on a few persons with that particular competence. On the other hand the number of persons competent enough to cause trouble will also decrease significantly.

    If I was involved I would have selected OpenVMS , now owned by HP as operating system for the servers running either MySQL or Oracle as a database and developing the software in Ada or (horrendous thought) Pascal or maybe Java.

    ---
    OpenVMS - The OS with longer uptimes than Microsoft support policies

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:Nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MySQL?

      Are you kidding? No one uses MySQL for anything mission critical or performance critical. Putting MySQL in the same category as Oracle indicates you are either a troll or just don't know shit about databases.

      LMAO!

  72. The need to reject baseless assumptions... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'The need to securely identify people moving across national and international borders has never been more important than it is today,'

    If *anything* the lesson of 9/11 should have been that identification is not effective nor relevant to certain types of security sitautions, like air travel.

    Instead, the assumption stands that identification is essential, but, in regards to 9/11, it was somehow lacking, either in format (see REAL ID act) or application.

    Bad security is built around bad assumptions. Remove the bad assumptions and rebuild the security framework.

    Based on the vast quantity of individuals flying, and the amazing sum of variables, all of which indicate little about the potential danger of the passenger, a defense could be made that we would be safer building a security system around nameless tickets.

  73. The scum in Redmond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am terrrribly sorry to be irate and faley... but...

    How the FUCK can all of the seattlite liberal types who hang out at burning man and protest the WTO just sit back and work day to day at the Redmond campus while their company works to promote a system that no terrorist or criminal will use, but will be used by any and every law abiding mind that may wish to change the government.

    What is sick in my mind is that their is a stock options culture that made their million and in so sucking off the microsoft tit, has surrendered any and all free thinking that is in opposition to "the comapny".

    We totally surrendered to this fascist state. And the drones that walk down the hallways in redmond have become bobbleheads surrendering their intellectual integrity and their souls for the stock options that bought them their houses in the gentrified (and formerly low rent) regions of seattle.

    damn.we fucked ourselves good this time... everything has changed and I can't ever see it going back.

    If you can sell your sould for stock options, it is easy to sell out your bill of rights.

    damn.

    sorry for any typos, I am definitely ranting.

    1. Re:The scum in Redmond by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      Excuse me - I'm a Seattlite liberal type who hung out at burning man and protested the WTO - and I quit working at Microsoft recently because of everything - HB 1515, this mess, mismanagement, etc. Now I work on educational software for grade schoolers. I got another of my friends at work to come with me.

      So don't despair - there is some impact. Microsoft is feeling the heat from its employees over all these issues. And I'm no millionaire, either - I live off my income.

    2. Re:The scum in Redmond by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      By the way, mod parent up. This is an excellent point - there are so many who don't put their money where their mouth is.

      It's like peak oil - it's easy to complain about how we're going to see oil prices skyrocket because we don't reduce our use, but still drive a car around. It doesn't help anything. It's easy to complain about wasting energy without using CF bulbs where you can. Talk is cheap.

      What's really amazing is how many Slashdot posters (including myself) are running on Windows. I really look forward to when I can get a really intuitive OS to run on my PC - I'd like a Mac, but I don't want to buy another system.

    3. Re:The scum in Redmond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      that's very heartening...

      but it will never be modded up... for the same reason that all the intelligensia that opposed Bush in the last election did not take to the streets opposing the obvious scam in Ohio on the part of Diebold.

      Intellectual have a tendency to rant for years in advance of an event, such as all the posts on slashdot that disclosed the easy methods of error on the part of diebold.

      However, when what was feared came to pass, was there a riot in the streets? No. Even though it was obvious that O'Dell did what he said he was going to do... did the intelligensia run to the streets shouting?

      No. We all rolled over, just like we will roll over and take the ID cards and get back to playing the current replacement for everquest.

      One of the problems with our society is that the people who see the problems wish to stay on the morale high ground to the degree that they will whistle dixie all the way to the furnaces.

      Thanks for leaving Microsoft. It is perhaps... not evil... but spineless in it's pursuit of a stronger market share and even more so of the mindshare.

  74. Did anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else read that as the need to secretly track individuals?

  75. Guns and the no-fly list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Here's a ref on the no-fly-list issue: No fly, no guns. This is scary because you get put on the no-fly list through some secret process, the list is secret, the evidence against the listee is secret, there's no judicial process to revue the list or get off the list. In fact they officially deny that the list even exists at all!

    For the benefit of our non-American readers, I'll explain: the right to own guns is the most fundamental right we have. All the others rest on that right. What good is the right to freedom of speech if we have no means to defend ourselves physical? "If you criticize the government we're going to come into your house and take you to a detention camp" would render freedom of speech meaningless. Fortunately we have the right to own guns so that such threats are not realistic, and therefore the citizens can say "I have freedom of speech, and in fact anyone who tries to take that away from me is risking his life to do so."

    So prohibiting gun ownership based on a secret list is like saying that the government can secretly take away all the rights of anyone it wants to. This is a terrifying possibility.

    1. Re:Guns and the no-fly list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I'm a non-American and I'm totally confused now. Are you saying that you believe that with a gun you can protect your freedom of speech because if the feds come to arrest you, you'll just defend yourself with your gun?? Not a chance. If it comes down to a gunfight, the best outcome you can hope for is to start a civil war (the worst of course, is one dead you). And in this age, you need a lot more than guns to win a civil war...

      I've lived in countries with little freedom of speech, both where private citizens had guns and where they didn't. It made no difference. In the end, the over-the-top governments dragged the country into a civil war, and it's pretty much a coin-toss on who wins one of those.

    2. Re:Guns and the no-fly list by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      So prohibiting gun ownership based on a secret list is like saying that the government can secretly take away all the rights of anyone it wants to. This is a terrifying possibility.

      Here's hoping it never ever sees the lights of day, but I bet that if such a bill ever becomes law it will end up before the Supreme Court, where it should be struck down.

      Falcon
  76. Godwin's Law by westlake · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Godwin's Law by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know it's invoking Godwin's Law, but not as a flame or troll. It's the truth. Last time one of the big IT players made a National ID system, it was for Hitler.

  77. Well ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    It looks like I just bought my last HP printer.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  78. It's a vendor press release, not national policy by Nkwe · · Score: 1
    Yahoo is running a story about HP's national ID plan

    Yahoo is not running a story; they are repeating a press release which announces a product. HP would probably love the US Government to select their product to be used to build a national ID system, but we as a country have to decide if we want that or not.

    If you are opposed to a national ID system, don't waste your time whining about HP's product or the technology that it is built upon, spend your time lobbying your senators and representatives against pursuing national id.

  79. Real ID, HP, and .Net by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I can't decide if I'm upset because it's a National ID, because it's made by HP or because it's being built on .NET.

    All three!!!

    Falcon
  80. No, YOU are clueless by melted · · Score: 1

    They scale well enough if you understand what you're doing. If you just mindlessly sit there and write code without scalability in mind, then you'll have problems with any other language.

    And try to write a large (by large I mean more than 200K lines of code), componentized, interoperable, maintainable system in Perl or Python and see how that scales for you.

    You should have started with .NET when it came out, i.e. 4 years ago. Half a year of experience doesn't lend much weight to your words.

    1. Re:No, YOU are clueless by suezz · · Score: 1

      I do know enough not to put any microsoft on any public facing site - and if you do you are the clueless one. My applications face the public and are scrutinized by a security team - we will not put any microsoft product on a public facing site - it doesn't scale - believe me we are have tried in a lab and it really doesn't scale. I have written componentized, ineteroperable, maintainable system in both Perl and Python and yes they do scale and are very secure because of the reasons mentioned above.

      As far as starting .net four years ago - it was vaporware four years ago and if you put it production four years ago then you really can do magic. .net is just now almost ready for production sites but it runs on microsoft so we can't put it on external sites because of the insecurity of their platform.

      Since you say it was out four years ago then why can't MS put it in longhorn - microsoft is even dropping it from longhorn because it such an "advanced RAD tool". Must be too advanced for longhorn or if it is so componentized, interoperable, maintainable system why can't they put it in longhorn. I have perl and python all over my linux distribution and it actually is scalable, componentized, and interoperates with anything. so where is this .net in microsoft's os since is such an "advanced RAD environment" as you say.

  81. Let the evil jokes begin by Dasch · · Score: 1

    I guess Microsoft finally found a purpose for PassPort...

  82. .NET ? by Hymer · · Score: 0

    ...and how is it supposed to work with HP's REAL money-making servers (HP-UX, Tru64, VMS) ??

  83. Foil hats off, gentlemen by Urusai · · Score: 1

    The national ID system is guaranteed to fail with this kind of ridiculous convergence. I mean, honestly, with Microsoft technology at the fore, the system will be as full of holes as, well, the rest of their software. Your liberty and anonymity will be safe, rest assured.

  84. If I were the president... by suyashs · · Score: 1

    I would proclaim HP, Microsoft, and SCO as the Axis of Evil...

    --
    http://chrono.posterous.com/
    1. Re:If I were the president... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were you, I would ask myself if I wanted to be a simpleton all my life.

  85. Free software... Consultancy? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    That's for a US system rather than the UK one. However even with free software I'm sure Oracle could find a way to generate 30 billion dollars worth of consultancy.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Free software... Consultancy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they can too, they figured out how to charge my state for more licenses than there were employees.

  86. BULLSH1T by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    Forget about HP, .Net, or any of this other IT 1337 5p33k. Ask yourself this: If the U.S. or Europe create systems to track people across different states and whatnot, is that really going to accomplish anything? Maybe it will help find petty criminals, but that's like killing a fly with a sledgehammer.

    Or, what if many countries of the world get together and implement a compatible system that allows them to track people's identities across all those countries. Is that going to help fight terrorism? Or are the terrorists simply going to figure out a way to live without an ID card? I mean seriously, if you're the kind of crazy motherfscker who wants to blow up innocent people, do you really care if you drive without a license, or do you really care if you can't buy booze without an ID? Or are you simply going to live without a picture identification and work all your evil schemes in a cave somewhere? These people, you have to remember, live like some kind of cavemen in the middle of the desert. Cavemen with AK-47s. So no stupid national ID system is going to help fight that.

    In other words, this is a big thing of bullsh1t.

  87. privatizing SS by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    It's way past tyme SS is privatized. As far as I'm concerned it's robbing Peter to pay Paul. Now there's something like 13 people paying into SS for everyone recieving it but soon it will be more like 2 or 3 paying for everyone receiving. It was meant to be a safety net, but people should be saving and investing their own money for retirement, and the earlier started the easier. With a compound interest of 10% a person who saves $2000 a year from the age of 18 to 25 will have three quarters of a million dollars saved when they reach 65. By this tyme they should also own their own home and shouldn't even need SS. They can sale their home, move to the Caribbean and buy a bungalo.

    Falcon
    1. Re:privatizing SS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with a compound interest of 150% a person who saves $25K a year from the age of conception to 1st grade will have a gazillion dollars saved when they reach 102. But so fucking what. It's a practically worthless statement because what person can afford to save that much that young and can get that kind of interest rate?

    2. Re:privatizing SS by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      what person can afford to save that much that young and can get that kind of interest rate?

      First I wasn't speaking specifically of interest as in the interest paid by the bank, I was talking about the appreciation of stocks in a corporation, ie captial gains. The compounding comes in in reinvesting dividends, of which DRIPs, dividend reinvestment programs, that many corporations offer come in handy. Okay so the markets do suffer crashs but over the long term they do rise. The part about age is different I agree. Even starting investing later, say about the age of 25, by that tyme you should be able to invest more than $2000. Heck you can put that $2000 in an IRA in which case it is tax deferred. You may also have a 401K to put more tax deferred income in, or an ESOP, Employee Stock Ownership Program. Actually I knew someone who worked at Home Depot who was enrolled in the ESOP there while at the same tyme attending college. And he didn't get fiancial aid to attend, he paid for it out of pocket. Simply, if there's the will more than likely there's a way.

      Falcon
    3. Re:privatizing SS by chrish · · Score: 1

      Interesting fantasy you've got there; from 18-25, I was pretty much entirely in school. I could barely afford food, there's no possible way I could've saved $2000.

      --
      - chrish
    4. Re:privatizing SS by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Interesting fantasy you've got there; from 18-25, I was pretty much entirely in school. I could barely afford food, there's no possible way I could've saved $2000.

      Ok so you start later, but within a year or two of graduation you should be able to invest much more then $2000. My point was that you need to start saving and investing as soon as you can instead of waiting too long and end up depending on social security just to make ends meet or die broke.

      Falcon
    5. Re:privatizing SS by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      I invested into stocks. One doubled in 2 weeks, the other went from $115 to $2 with reverse splits. On average stocks do good, but you can't really call them a safety net, because there are no guarantees. Higher return only comes at higher risk. And in fact the SS administration could invest the money for everyone, like mutual funds do, spreading the individual risk, so people are not hung out to dry like the little fish in a sea full of sharks.

  88. Re:Godwin's Law... is foolish, read Hyakawa instea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Godwins law is a simple judgement to stop thought.

    How many people resist seeing actual similarities between our government and NAZI germany simply because they wish to be above the emotives that such comparisons make.

    Face the facts. Our government is using techniques similar to NAZI germany to control and limit dissent and the ability of the opposing parties to regain control of countries mind.

    My law is that Godwins law is just a tool to demote any analogy to NAZI germany to the level of a sophmoric crank.

    So screw Godwin, or at least let's give him a job as the person on the public address system speaking to the masses to stay calm and not think about the ramifications of the situation. His verbage will be well used to keep the computer geeks calm as they march into the oven... because after all.. the law is the law... and Godwin wrote the law.

  89. HP isn't a bad company either by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Carli Fiorina was a bad CEO though.

    Falcon
  90. .Net? by artemis67 · · Score: 1

    .NOT!

    1. Re:.Net? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .Nincompoop

  91. Re:open source doesn't always stand for an open mi by Hymer · · Score: 0

    There are two problems with .NET : Microsoft and Windows.
    The day M$ will deliver a .NET for something else than Windows there will only be 1 problem with .NET...

  92. In Soviet Russia by Zhari · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, the government... oh, wait... damn.

    --
    Hell is other people
  93. What's RAD got to do with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about a national security ID system screams for RAD? It's not as though we're talking about development of massively complex applications with tons and tons of screens, etc.

    At most, there will be a few queries made to a big database.

    Face it. A national security ID system ought to be about *security*, not some single-platform programming tool / buzzword.

  94. RE: not exactly by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree that we're collectively allowing "freedom" to become a meaningless buzzword - but the 60's hippie generation didn't do much of anything to help prevent that. Rather, much of it had seeds in that era.

    IMHO, we do an awful lot of worshipping the 60's that's unwarranted. Flower children, hipppies, etc. etc. The fact is, most of the people growing up in the 60's doing their psychadelic drugs, having sex with anyone willing, and protesting Vietnam ended up tightly wrapped up in "corporate America" afterwards anyway. (Hey, take Steve Jobs for example. Still pays lip service to his 60's "hippie past" with all those folk-rock 60's artists he has play music before his Apple keynote speeches and so on. But he's just another big-time corporate C.E.O. today.)

    The 60's was great from a cultural standpoint. Lots of really good music and art came from it. But "greed" was never exclusive property of the "corporation". It's a trait shared *individually* by all of us, and properly channeled - can be a good thing. (To some extent, "greed" is what motivates people. If you didn't want more than what you already have, why would you work for someone doing a task you disliked? If there was no such thing as "greed", pay-raises would serve no useful purpose in the workplace.)

    The real problem is, most Americans seem to be far too "non-chalant" about political issues. We take a "Who cares? Politics is boring! New law X or Y doesn't affect me directly anyway." attitude, and government grows and grows in power. The founding fathers of our country realized this could be its downfall. That's why they made such statements as "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." Preserving freedom is *work*. It's not something you attain once and you're finished. You have to fight to keep it every day, or it slips away, one new piece of legislation at a time.

  95. fear of government by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    You're a goddamn paranoid moron. This is in no way detrimental to your freedom. Pull your head out of your government-fearing ass and see that

    Yeap I fear government just as Thomas Jefferson did.

    Falcon
  96. McCarthy, Hoover, and "Homeland Security" by falconwolf · · Score: 1
    ,p>I can't help but wonder, if Joe Mccarthy was alive, if Bush would nominate him to be Director of Homeland Security?

    I bet J Edgar Hoover would be happy to be the Director. Or both, that way Cointel, Project Phoenix, and McCarthyism can all be rolled into one. Bet Stalin or the gestapo would love it too.

    Falcon
    1. Re:McCarthy, Hoover, and "Homeland Security" by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Hire McCarthy? And have him expose the neocons for what they really are?

  97. evil government by Infonaut · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Our government stinks with evil.

    Is this the same government that helped stop Fascism, stopped Soviet Communism, and gave the world the Internet, or is it a wholly different government? Is it the government that sat by while the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan? Is it the same government that in the 1970s let inflation run rampant in the United States, causing the standard of living here and around the globe to stagnate, or is it the one that fostered a huge technology and economic boom through more open market policies?

    My point is that a government is never wholly good or evil. I'd say that describing a government as "good" or "evil" plays right into the hands of absolutists like Bush, except in the most extreme cases (Nazi Germany and Pol Pot's Cambodia come to mind).

    I'd say that even elected governments make mistakes, sometimes horrible ones. Talking about the US government desiring the enslavement of its own citizens is just bizarre. But putting a government like that of the United States in the same boat as one like Nazi Germany is absurd.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:evil government by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      putting a government like that of the United States in the same boat as one like Nazi Germany is absurd.

      Is it really? The US government herded certain groups of people into ghettos, remember Warsaw, stealing their land, killed many of them, and did medical procedures on others without their knowledge or consent. The government took children away from their parents and stuck them in boarding schools where they were beaten for speaking in their own languages. The government used others for medical experiments again without consent.

      Falcon
    2. Re:evil government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      helped stop facism? so the US got involved in the spanish civil war? stoped soviet communism? it stopped itself. gave the world the internet? the internet is a network of networks, packet switching is an invention by a brit. the www, which is what average joe calls the internet was invented by a brit at cern which is in switzerland/france. sat by while afghanistan was invaded? no they didn't they trained bin laden and friends and paid for the training camps. the same government that got its arse kicked in vietnam trying to eradicate the damn picko commies, the same government that got its arse kicked in somalia, that did nothing about Rwanada, that planned on supporting terrorist groups to over throw castro in cuba, that supported / trained terrorist groups across central america, the illegal invade coutries, that strip the civil rights of their populace all in the name of so called security.

      the US government has an overwhelming history of being evil, and trying to take credit for things they haven't done, while trying to get people to forget about things they have done.

    3. Re:evil government by pcgabe · · Score: 1
      The government took children away from their parents and stuck them in boarding schools where they were beaten for speaking in their own languages.
      And on Slashdot, you are modded Troll for speaking your mind.
      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    4. Re:evil government by loqi · · Score: 1
      My point is that a government is never wholly good or evil.

      Okay. The GP said "Our government stinks with evil", which is slightly different. It means there is a noxious odor of evil that pervades the actions of our government. It was true when we were destroying Chile and Nicaragua, it was true when we were (are?) destroying Iraq and Afghanistan. I see no reason to assume it isn't still true.

      NO, this does not mean that every elected official is evil (or even necessarily the majority of them, although the jury's still out on that one). It simply means that the *organization*, if anthropomorphized, behaves like a psychopath. From M-W:
      an emotionally and behaviorally disordered state characterized by clear perception of reality except for the individual's social and moral obligations and often by the pursuit of immediate personal gratification in criminal acts, drug addiction, or sexual perversion
      --
      If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
    5. Re:evil government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Helped *stop* fascism? What fucking planet do you live on dude? IBM helped to sell them the machines used to track the people being killed by the Nazis. Let's not even talk about other little Nazi helpers like Ford.

      Fast forward to current times... We are practically goose-stepping our way back into fasciscm. If you don't belive that those in power desire absolute power, and if you can't recognize the current extreme alignment of corporate interests with government interests, then you must have your head firmly planted up your ass.

  98. The more things change by bitswapper · · Score: 1

    The more they stay the same.

    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    --Benjamin Franklin, 1759

    The fact that a faulty and insecure technology underlies an obvious grab for power is perhaps a good thing.

  99. It's the software not the API by NuclearRampage · · Score: 1

    What we should really be worried about is the software that all this will run on, not the API used. .NET has yet to be proven insecure by any means, but all the software pieces the application is going to run on are well known to have security issues. Maybe we should ask for this to be ran on Linux with Postgre instead of Server 2003 and MS SQL 2000 (slammer worm victim).

  100. HP techs said we were drunk by samnice · · Score: 1

    yeah, i am fully inspired with confidence in HP's data management. i work for a small non-profit and they recently called to say they were coming over to work on our servers and wanted permission to do so. we told them we didn't have any HP servers and that even if we did, they wouldn't be allowed to work on them. they called back five minutes later and asked were we located at such-and such address. we said, yes we were, but that again, we didn't have and never would have HP servers and didn't this seem like a good time to check their records. the tech said, "you're a liar". well, a few more minutes go by and yet another tech calls to inquire about their service call. at this point, we repeat the above information - yes this is our location and yes this is our phone number, but no, we didn't call and did we mention we don't even have HP servers. the tech's response was, "Have you been drinking?".
    so great, the masters of data management will be in charge of a national ID system. i can see it now - "Yes, officer, i do live here, and that is my phone number, but my name isn't Osama!"

  101. comparing OS to ID systems by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    You're comparing OS kernels with ID systems. Apples and oranges. OS kernels require extreme performance and direct hardware access among other things; obviously an ID system may not need these things as badly.

    An ID system won't require extreme performance, or access to hardware? I can easily see airport checkin being even slower as well as any other "process" or system that needs to check a database. Or are you saying these should all be done in ram? What happens then when there's a power failure? No, quite to the contrary an ID system will NEED top performance and hardware access.

    Falcon
  102. It depends on what the term RAD means to you by melted · · Score: 0

    It depends on what the term RAD means to you. If it means using safe language with verifiable intermediate code, garbage collection and a large, managed library of well designed components available to it, then .NET (and Java) is a RAD tool. It cuts down significantly on boilerplate code which no one can deny is a good thing.

    If it means Borland Delphi, then no, I wouldn't advise to use THAT for this system either.

    Quite frankly, I'd rather see this system implemented in a managed language, be it Java or one of .NET languages, for the reasons of security. A language that by design doesn't have buffer overflows, pointer errors or memory leaks (I know you can still have them, but you have to make a conscious effort).

    Its other benefits pertinent to this task are:
    1. Unicode, l10n and i18n awareness "baked in".
    2. Future-proof, will run on 64bit hardware once 64 bit URT comes out
    3. As efficient as unmanaged code written without "shortcuts". Gets compiled into machine code when executed.
    4. Easy to deploy and maintain. IIS6 on Windows 2003 is the most secure among the commonly used web servers according to Secunia.

    Check this out:
    IIS6: http://secunia.com/product/1438/
    Apache 2: http://secunia.com/product/73/
    Apache 1.3.x: http://secunia.com/product/72/

    Hard to believe, eh?

    1. Re:It depends on what the term RAD means to you by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Insightful
      very hard to believe. but then again, i read the text on their own site :

      Statistics based on released Secunia advisories since 2003. Choose below to see statistics based on different criteria.

      Please Note. The statistics below should not be used for a direct comparison of how secure two different products are. This is partly due to the fact that a Secunia advisory often cover multiple vulnerabilities. Also certain operating systems bundle a very large number of software packages and are therefore affected by many vulnerabilities that would be counted as a vulnerability in stand alone products for other operating systems / platforms. Other factors such as vendor response times and ability to properly fix vulnerabilities is also important.

  103. Ultra Hi-Res Photo of proposed ID card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  104. so who'll pick up the pieces then??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    we have in the "true Blue patriotic" corner:

    Microsoft
    HP
    .NEt

    and in the "commie red" corner, the alternative:
    IBM
    Linux
    mono

    I know who I'd put money on getting it right... sadly for everyone, I don't think Linux would get much of a look in because of all the schmoozing from Microsoft...

    Something this important, really, really needs to have the code in the open for review. I'd hate to think of all the opportunities for backdoors to be programmed in for the use of the corporatists to edit the database without leaving any traces of it. That would allow them to easily have anyone they don't like declared an enemy of the state just by going in and fudging the data... and the enforcement agencies would just go along with it as the data can't be wrong now can it...

  105. societies of control by critical_v · · Score: 1

    i suggest reading "postscript to the societies of control" by gilles deleuze...it's a good theoretical breakdown of the ways in which conrol enters our lives through various institutions.

    http://www.watsoninstitute.org/infopeace/vy2k/dele uze-societies.cfm

    a brief excerpt:

    "We are in a generalized crisis in relation to all the environments of enclosure--prison, hospital, factory, school, family. The family is an "interior," in crisis like all other interiors--scholarly, professional, etc. The administrations in charge never cease announcing supposedly necessary reforms: to reform schools, to reform industries, hospitals, the armed forces, prisons. But everyone knows that these institutions are finished, whatever the length of their expiration periods. It's only a matter of administering their last rites and of keeping people employed until the installation of the new forces knocking at the door. These are the societies of control, which are in the process of replacing disciplinary societies."

    --
    You sure 'bout dat?
  106. What's so bad about a Nat'l ID? by zerus · · Score: 1

    I don't get what's so wrong with having a national ID card. We already have Passports that are managed by the State dept, and driver's licenses that are managed by our state's, why not combine the systems? Is there much use in carrying around 2+ government issued ID cards? I do think it should be for ID, driving, and border crossing purposes ONLY. I don't like these ideas that I saw flying around on tv news networks about incorporating our ATM/credit cards, because that's too much. If it's just a driver's license and passport combined, what's the big problem? Don't tell me it's the computer system required to make it because most geeks I know would kill (not literally) to get on a big project like that.

    1. Re:What's so bad about a Nat'l ID? by kalislashdot · · Score: 1

      Good point. Rememebr from 5th Element? Multi-Pass. Why one one id, then have atributes for what it is good for. One person can drive and go to other countries. Anohter can drive cars and trucks but not go into other counties. Another could not drive but may pass into other counties. All with the same ID just different attibutes.

      I think the Driver's licence thing come from the states reserving that power. Now a days it seems the idea of states is almost non existant. The fed and state have overlapping laws, etc, Of course what is good for texas may not be so good for California. Actuly that is why I hate federal laws.

    2. Re:What's so bad about a Nat'l ID? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      I don't get what's so wrong with having a national ID card

      How about the government following the Constitution of the uSA? Is there something bad with that? Nowhere in it does it give government the power to issue national ID cards. Instead it limits what government can do.

      Falcon
  107. Reason Given for National ID? by BananaSlug · · Score: 0
    The need to securely identify people moving across national and international borders has never been more important than it is today,' said Jim Ganthier, worldwide leader, Defense, Intelligence and Public Safety, HP.

    The wording of this is peculiar enough to check what it means.

    national Pronunciation Key (nsh-nl, nshnl)

    Of, relating to, or belonging to a nation as an organized whole: a national anthem.

    international Pronunciation Key (ntr-nsh-nl, -nshnl)

    Extending across or transcending national boundaries: international fame.

    Do they want these IDs to be internal passports in addition to being used for national border crosssing?

  108. I hate National ID systems but love .Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the system was 100% secure so what?

    It's the people who "should" have access that worry me. It's the huge number of people who think we should be cataloged that really worry me.

    Many of us need to duck and dive to get by - the grey economy has often helped me out.

    And if any of us choose to oppose what we see as despotism we need as much space as possible to do that. The unfettered exhange of ideas will determine who is right.

  109. Yeah that's right, I can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And there's an easy way to do it, too. Move to a country that still values freedom. Boycot everything in the US by leaving.

  110. Did ANYONE read the patriot act? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Nobody in congress read it before voting to approve it.

    Falcon
  111. boycott HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This gives you even more reason to boycott HP. Not that their products would be that great anyways.

  112. Lets review-Global Responsability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's news for everyone. The world isn't black or white. There's no "US" verses "THEM". Freedom has been all over the world, and so has tyranny, both big and small. And that's because basically humans have more in common than what's different. A Swede can be just as greedy as an American. A Nigerian can be as honest as say a Mexican. The US may have built the worlds attention around it's freedom (of which we still have more than the doomsayers think we do.*), and hence any loss will garner more attention than say if Chileans lose their freedom.

    But we still shouldn't lose our perspective (and hence ignore), and forget that we should be paying attention to what's happenning in all parts of the world. Because all the bad things will not so convienently follow your scripts, nor even say "here I am you goody-two shoes".

    *Yes we still enjoy more freedoms than a lot of countries .e.g. Saudi Arabia and women.

  113. The correct headline is ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    "HP Announces New National Citizens Personal Financial Information Dissemination System Built on .NET."

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  114. Idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Spelling is not evil, therefore calling it "bad" is incorrect.

    The word you are struggling to find, my sadly indolent friend, is poor.

  115. So by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
    How long would it take for you to write a signal processing engine running on a headless BeOS box in .NET?

    Nothing too fancy, now - just process an 8-channel pipe with 10Hz/pipe signals.

    --
    Yeah, right.
  116. Don't forget by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

    Larry offered the DB for free!!

    --
    Yeah, right.
  117. Lets review-GroupThink. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For similiar reasons to why there's always a reply to "Slashdot Hypocrisy" posts.

  118. Re: Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So thats where you went today!"

  119. Troll by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I don't how this was considered a troll. Unless history and facts are trolls.

    Falcon
  120. Mark of the Beast - The end is near by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is a sign of the Apocalypse. The Beast of Redmond is in league with the Beast (GWB) and this is the mark of the Beast.

    "He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666" (Rev. 13:16-18).

    Now is the time to rise up and fight for democracy. Silence is acceptance. Many of you did nothing when they passed the Patriot Act and Patriot Act II but now is the time to get organized and fight to save your way of life. Power to the people. United you stand and divided you fall. Put aside your political differences (democrats and republican) and send your leaders a message.

  121. The Mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In your hand or head?
    Where would you like it?
    "It's for your best interest".

    you: "O really!? wow cool!!"

    n00bs.

  122. Re:open source doesn't always stand for an open mi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are two problems with your comment: Intellectual vacuousness and you. Oh wait, that's only one...

  123. What to call it, what to call it... by ksuhr · · Score: 1


    Well, it'll be everywhere..like the sky...and um, it's based on a network, or net..so

    Skynet!

    bing, bang, done, let's break for lunch!

  124. Groups like this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://www.givemeliberty.org is currently working on our tax problems..sure some, probably all of you think that taxes are normal and this group is a bunch of whack-o's, BUT, be they correct or not, they are standing up for what they believe in. We need to shoot down all these freedom destroying laws that are being passed.

    It is a crying shame that the bulk of the American people are letting their freedoms, their liberties be eroded by the federal government. National ID Card? No Thank You...

    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    -Ben Franklin

  125. Expensive national ID card printer cartridges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have some advice for the government. Don't let them trick you with the purchase cost of the national id card printers. The cost of replacement cartridges will be through the roof!

  126. Who's identity? by Major+Disaster,+here · · Score: 1

    All your ID are belong to us.

  127. Thank God Its Microsoft by johnos · · Score: 1

    Because there's no chance it will actually work.

  128. Re: not exactly by loqi · · Score: 1

    Just because everyone is greedy doesn't mean that greed should be socially acceptable. In many societies it's not.

    The problem with a greed-driven society is that the greediest come out on top. Example: every multi-billionaire that's still working like a dog or screwing someone over to make another buck. Yes, that's probably how he got rich in the first place (yes it's probably a he), and yes it's still compulsive behavior.

    Like it or not, when you codify personal power into a monetary system, money buys anything. Groceries, murders, pay-per-view wrestling, politicians. So the bulk of the power ends up with those who want primarily just that. Insert some proverb about people who want power being the last ones that should have it.

    The size of government is completely beside the point. Whereever laws are made, you will find businessmen trying to distort them to the (usually exclusive) benefit of business. Even Adam Smith warned of this in The Wealth of Nations. All smaller government does at that point is lower the price of lawmakers.

    --
    If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
  129. Nice Terminology by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    "Refuseniks"? Sounds like someone's trying really hard to relate them to communism...

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  130. Has anyone read "The Hanged Man's Song"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It lays out the problem with this whole idea very clearly.
    Basically, the system will NOT do what it is supposed to do. What it WILL do is allow those in power to STAY in power. I'm not talking about Bush either, he's just a puppet.

  131. To divert your attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of us are against Nation-ID anyway. Now throw HP and .Net (Microsoft) in and people forget, what the main issue is and start worrying about how insecure Nation-ID will be based on .NET.

  132. HP Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our crappy printers are the last product we bought from HP. As an ethical and responsible CEO I will actively boycott HP and make sure that my company does not buy any HP systems or peripherals anymore.

  133. Stolen from under me! Mod Up! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I came up with the same line just now, hours too late. I salute you.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  134. American Slave Boat continues ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So - assuming the government gets rid of all the unwanteds:

    Democrats, single women with degrees, the old, the educated, unionists, your children...

    People can be disposed of more easily, just by deleting them,
    no ID - no job, no money, no food, no home.

    I think Max Headroom had a episode about 'Blanks',
    people with no record and no identity...

  135. Here in europe... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    ...we avoid to go to such strange countries with strange rules. and now i must say that the usa bcame one of those countries in the past years.

    I would not even fly to the us if i got it as a gift, because i don't want all my data inserted into 35 databases and some obscure foreign government (us) to track my actions.

    in my eyes this thing now is just a furter step to industry-feudalism.

    no, thanks. ;)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  136. I failed to confirm you are a human! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    > You failed to confirm you are a human. Please double-check the 7-letter image and make sure you typed in what it says.

    AAAAHH! Someone replaced my with a very small shell script! :(

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  137. Troll by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    And on Slashdot, you are modded Troll for speaking your mind.

    I guess so.

    Falcon
  138. quotes by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    There is a truism, I'm not sure what the source is, that we are safe so long as we have an incompetent government and/or police force. If they're betting the farm on .NET, we have relatively little to fear. If they start doing things properly, get very worried.

    Maybe it's one of these:

    • "Never vote for the best candidate, vote for the one who will do the least harm." Frank Dane
    • "That government is best which governs least." Henry David Thoreau
    • "Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." Thomas Paine
    • "Which government is the best? That which teaches us to govern ourselves." Goethe
    • "That government is best that governs least." --Thomas Jefferson

    I see that both Thomas Jefferson and Henry David Thoreau are credited with one of my favorite political quotes, "That government is best that governs least." Then again I admire both.

    Falcon
    1. Re:quotes by toby · · Score: 1
      They're certainly in the same vein, but the citation I'm thinking of is not among them. Churchill could probably add one or two lines to the family, such as his famous "democracy" epigram.

      The funny thing is I probably saw it in a /. sig :-)

      --
      you had me at #!
    2. Re:quotes by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      They're certainly in the same vein, but the citation I'm thinking of is not among them. Churchill could probably add one or two lines to the family, such as his famous "democracy" epigram.

      The source I used had some quotes from Churchhill, here it is, Collected Quotes on Politics

      Falcon
  139. It's being done in PHP.NET? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Er... wait...

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  140. right to privacy by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    While the right to privacy isn't enumerated in the Bill of Rights, the Nineth Amendment does say:


    Amendment IX - Construction of Constitution. Ratified 12/15/1791.

    Further courts including the US Supreme Court has ruled there is a right to privacy:

    • Supreme Court strikes down Texas sodomy law
      WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court Thursday struck down a Texas state law banning private consensual sex between adults of the same sex in a decision gay rights groups hailed as historic.
    • Thurgood Marshall
      President John F. Kennedy appointed Thurgood Marshall to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In this capacity, he wrote over 150 decisions including support for the rights of immigrants, limiting government intrusion in cases involving illegal search and seizure, double jeopardy, and right to privacy issues.
    • Privacy
      Early treatises on privacy appeared with the development of privacy protection in American law from the 1890's onward, and privacy protection was justified largely on moral grounds. This literature helps distinguish descriptive accounts of privacy, describing what is in fact protected as private, from normative accounts of privacy defending its value and the extent to which it should be protected. In these discussions some treat privacy as an interest with moral value, while others refer to it as a moral or legal right that ought to be protected by society or the law. Clearly one can be insensitive to another's privacy interests without violating any right to privacy, if there is one.

    That was just a quick check but I'd bet I can find more references to the right to privacy. The reference at Stanford University mentions privacy protection from the 1890s.

    Falcon
  141. best possible news by briancnorton · · Score: 1
    1) A flawed concept built by 2) a VERY flawed company on 3)an extremely flawed technology. This is government spending at it's best folks, and you can bet the farm that it won't work.

    The part where you should be torn is that you are happy your tax dollars are being wasted.

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

  142. visual check of the ID by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Where I live now it's stretching it to say 1 in 5 sales clerks or cashiers even check id when the customer writes a check or uses a credit card. This really pisses me off, how do they know the check or card wasn't stolen? I've lived here for several years now and that's how it's been the whole tyme, but where I moved from even people who know you check your id. I couldn't write a check or use a credit card without being asked for id. Many places would write down the drivers license number and such.

    Falcon
    1. Re:visual check of the ID by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      Yep. I am in the habit of supplying my ID even if they dont ask for it.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
  143. Good place for Open Source by CaptainTux · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think this is a great time to assemble an ad-hoc group of crack programmers, put together a proposal for the government, and really push for this system to be based on open source software. Linux, PHP, Postgre, Python, Ruby, they could all be a good fit for a system like this.

    --
    Anthony Papillion
    Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
    "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
    1. Re:Good place for Open Source by Esine · · Score: 1

      Exactly, why should a system like this be propietary?

  144. It looks like I just bought my last HP printer. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I bought my last HP printer some years ago. My new one, well under a year, is a Canon. You might say I'm a Canon person as that's what my SLR is too and I'd like to get Canon's EOS 1Ds Mark II. Unfortunately my pc is an HP, I plan on replacing it with a Mac though.

    Falcon
  145. In Soviet Russia, the government... oh, wait... d by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I brought up the Soviet Union's use of internal passports related to another article. A reply to it says internal passorts are still required:

    Read ID
    They still require internal passports here in not-so-soviet Russia. Nobody will sell you a train ticket (or plane ticket) without your internal passport and you can't enter a train without proving your identity (with passport only, your name is printed on ticket). You can drive a car from town to town but you won't go much far without an ID because of traffic police (driver licence is usually sufficient, though). You are required to be officially registered at your living address and you can't stay more than a month at another place without at least a temporary registration. Government here wants to know every your move and with all that "terrorists" propaganda things are getting worse.

    Are we headed down the same road?

    Falcon
  146. Logic like this is the enemy of thought by RenoRelife · · Score: 1
    .NET is the most powerful environment around
    Based on what?
    the only other choice is JAVA
    For one thing, Java is developed to be as OS-independent as is possible, so saying because it's going to be implemented to work with Windows doesn't rule out Java at all. For another thing, why is Java the only other language possible? Maybe it's just the only other language HP knows about.
    if the developed application is insecure it will be because of poor design not .NET.
    As far as I'm concerned, anything as high-level as .NET or Java is already insecure by design. You cannot possibly control the secure development of code when your code is a frontend of a backend of a backend. Secure code is written from the ground up. I agree with the original poster of this thread. If it's going to contain important data, it absolutely has to be secure--Especially if that means leaving out HP, and Microsoft, and cluttered, high-level languages.
  147. worldwide leader? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks Jim. I hope to have the title "worldwide leader" when I grow up too! The Mormon cabal running HP has been pushing for this for decades. Maybe we can combine it with RFID chips implanted in our skulls?

  148. Simplify - it makes things so much easier by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    Oh please.

    Fascism. Remember that Hitler guy and that Mussolini guy?

    The USSR wouldn't have failed from within if it hadn't been resisted from without.

    The Internet was funded and put into place by the US government, regardless of who invented packet switching, which is only one aspect of the Internet. Tim Berners-Lee did invent the Web, but whether the Average Joe calls it the Internet or not, it's still just one component of a larger international network that was started by the United States.

    The US did not intervene in Afghanistan until after it was invaded, which I showed as an example of American moral cowardice.

    The US lost the war in Vietnam and withdrew from Somalia, an effort that started as a humanitarian mission. Remember all of those starving Somalis? I do.

    The US did nothing about Rwanda, much to my shame as an American.

    The US did try to overthrow Castro on many occasions. Let's not forget that the US was involved in the Cold War at the time, and American perceptions of Cuba were colored by it. The Bay of Pigs occurred but so did the Cuban Missile Crisis.

    American training and support of nasty regimes in Central America was also colored by the Cold War, and was a colossal miscalculation designed to favor dictatorships over totalitarian states.

    The Bush Administration has made incredibly stupid and dangerous civil rights limitations part of his "War on Terror" but it is a strength of American government that such overreaching can and will be fixed. Domestic freedoms have been curtailed before (Civil War, WW II, McCarthy Era), but our system is flexible enough to recover.

    So yes, the US government has a mixed history. Is that an "overwhelming history of being evil?" I don't think so.

    By the way, what government do you call your own?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  149. the way it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first of all, they tell u that the system is used for terrorists, of course no one can argue with the need to track down those evil killers, and hey! what do we really have to hide ? we are a good citizens with nothing to fear.

    soon enough the system will be used to track down those dirty screwed up pedophiles, after all pedophiles are the worst scum of the earth. they are even worth than the terrorists. this time most parents will cheer up and be happy ! after all, personal freedom is a small price to be paid to protect our little ones.

    the next step is to track down the drug dealers, no one can argue here too, we protected the kids from sex abuse, now we must protect them from drugs ? eh ? ad as i said before, all of the good citizens have nothing to fear or hide so far.

    the steps can continue to inclue everybody .. one way or the other

  150. To people who don't like to be corrected ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi. I'm the "its" vs "it's" guy. (I make three or four "its" vs "it's" corrections per day here, and also around three to ten other corrections.) One of these days, I'll get myself another account here that I use purely for correcting spelling errors. (I don't use my regular account for obvious reasons.) At that time, you, and every other person who, for some reason, hates the correct use of the finest human language in the world (so far), the English language (American version), will be able to declare me your foe, and thus avoid my posts.

    1. Re:To people who don't like to be corrected ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the finest human language in the world (so far)
      So, how many languages do you know? Before claiming English is the finest, you'd better get to know some other languages.
      Even though I know only 4 languages, I must say English is my favorite, and is by far the easiest. Instead of having 50 spelling rules, with 10 exceptions each (and obviously a couple of exceptions on these as well), like in Dutch for example, English seems to have no consistent spelling rules at all! I love it!
  151. Oh, I almost forgot ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    than an asenine correctly spelled one

    "asinine".

  152. One more thing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to be really obnoxious, use "then", instead of "than", in your signature line.

  153. Re: not exactly by inKubus · · Score: 1

    People are motivated by what I like to call the Seven Deadly Sins:

    Greed (Generosity)
    Lust (Self Control)
    Sloth (Zeal)
    Anger (Kindness)
    Pride (Humility)
    Envy (Love)
    Gluttony (Temperance)

    (The antithesis of which are the Virtues which the sins are against (in parenthesis)).

    "Sin creates [an inclination] to sin; it engenders vice by repetition of the same acts. This results in perverse inclinations which cloud conscience and corrupt the concrete judgment of good and evil. Thus sin tends to reproduce itself and reinforce itself, but it cannot destroy the moral sense at its root."

    Etc.

    The idea is that you have to balance out your sins with good deeds. You talk about how "everyone is greedy". Maybe you've killed your boss so you can make more money. Maybe you've sold deadly drugs to make money easily. Somehow I doubt it.

    You see, you place moral limits on your greed. Each and every person has their own idea about how much greed is too much, how much lust is too much, etc.

    What the 60s did was shake everything up. Society, the government, television, churches, parents were all telling them what to do; they were being drafted for service in the military for a pointless political war, a president was assassinated, race relations were fuming. The 60's were a horrible time.

    I think the hippies had some things right: Love is definitely better than Envy and Anger. I think they did too much of a lot of other things, too. But the hippies weren't everyone; they were the far edge of reason that helped pull society a little in their direction, a little away from the burning abyss of white christian oil power in this nation.

    There are many ways to think, and a government which places restrictions on thinking limits societies' ability to naturally evolve into something greater.

    Right now, the problem is that America is full of greed and lust and all of these things; much more than *I* am comfortable with. And it's about you and me. As I said earlier, we all have different Ideas. All I can do is do my best to share mine with others, and hopefully they understand what I mean and reciprocate so I can understand them.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  154. Yes, the US fought fascism by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    Helped *stop* fascism? What fucking planet do you live on dude?

    I live on the planet where America waged war against fascist Italy and Nazi Germany and ultimately defeated both of them. Your comparison of IBM and Ford's involvement in Nazi Germany versus the full weight of American military and industrial power, not to mention tens of thousands of American lives, is a case of creating equivalency where it doesn't even remotely exist.

    The alignment of corporate interests with government interests is obvious to anyone who is paying attention. But that is not the same thing as "evil", particularly given that in my opinion, corporate interests are not inherently evil. Because corporations have been given so much power, their capacity to fuck things up has become greater. Give anyone (churches, government agencies, corporations, unions) too much power, and bad things will follow. But we still have the capability to reign in corporate power. The American electorate is already starting to realize that the "War on Terror" has been oversold.

    By the way, if you are actually trying to convince me of something, don't tell me that I have my head up my ass, particularly if you're posting as an AC. The Far Right has been calling everyone who disagrees with them anti-American idiots, terrorist sympathizers, and worse. My feeling is that when we fall in to that line of base accusatory argumentation, the ability to see nuance and get beyond rhetoric is lost.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ