Slashdot Mirror


Atomic Clock Turns 50

karvind writes "BBC has an interesting story on the 50th birthday of atomic clocks. The first accurate caesium atomic clock was developed at the NPL in 1955 by Dr Louis Essen. And after 5 decades In September the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) used computer chip fabrication techniques to make a small atomic clock. The final development should see a battery-operated system about the size of a sugar lump. NIST also has a page on history of atomic clocks"

482 comments

  1. Yeah... by eurleif · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a good thing we had atomic clocks so we could be sure it was really 50 years!

    1. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please... how do you think people counted years before atomic clocks? For thousands of years prior, the Earth's regular orbit around the sun worked just fine. It's amazing how technology changes people's perspectives.

    2. Re:Yeah... by Floody · · Score: 1

      Please... how do you think people counted years before atomic clocks? For thousands of years prior, the Earth's regular orbit around the sun worked just fine. It's amazing how technology changes people's perspectives.

      Yup. Well, except for the fact that we're not quite sure exactly how many thousands of years it's been, but still....

      It's 2005AD, so that means it should be 2004 years from 1AD right?

    3. Re:Yeah... by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      It's a good thing we had atomic clocks so we could be sure it was really 50 years!
      Actually, it's been 50.0000000000000000000000178293 years.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    4. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You think things are less paranoid now? There's more orbital surveillance now than ever! This is "quaint" only because it assumed that orbital surveillance required somebody to be physically present.

      Back in the 40s and 50s, there was a lot of talk about doing things like surveillance (you can see a lot) and communications (a lot of people can see you) from orbit. One common assumption (which turned out to be correct) was that these things would be extremely important in the near future. Another assumption (which turned out to be totally wrong) was that this would be done by sending people to go live in orbit. Once there, they'd use photography, electronics, and other technology that wouldn't be much more advanced that what people were familiar with. You can see this in Arthur C. Clarke's original proposals for communications satellites and in fiction from Clarke, Heinlen, and others.

      What really happened, of course, is that rocket technology progressed relatively slowly, while electronics progressed very rapidly. So long before it was practical to a space station in orbit, it was practical to put a simple electronic gadget in orbit that would do all those chores pretty cheaply. Kind of sad, really -- if building better rockets had been more of an economic and military necessity, we'd probably be the space-going civilization that eveybody back in the 50s assumed we would be.

      Then again, the need to build smaller and more reliable electronics did a lot to jump-start the computer revolution -- so we mustn't complain too much!/p

    5. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I can't understand is, why didn't "management" come in and screw this all up?

      Considering that the last screw up of a Mars probe involves not converting measurements correctly, "management" had a lot of incentive not to screw up this time around.

  2. Of course! by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


    A beryllium atomic clock...just what the Doctor ordered!

    Jelly baby?

    ^_^

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  3. Units of measure by Kirkoff · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lump of sugar has to be the oddest comparison ever...

    --
    There are exactly 42,935,718 letter sized sheets in a square mile.
    1. Re:Units of measure by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Lump of sugar has to be the oddest comparison ever...

      Perhaps, but now I'm wondering how much time could be packed into a station wagon full of sugar cubes given this breakthrough.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:Units of measure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense! It's about the same size as a micro-football field in length... about a milli-Volkswagon in volume

    3. Re:Units of measure by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      So what happens when you drop it in your instant coffee and zap it in the microwave?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Units of measure by Tolookah · · Score: 1

      So what happens when you drop it in your instant coffee and zap it in the microwave?
      Your microwave knows exactly how long to cook it.

    5. Re:Units of measure by isoprophlex · · Score: 1

      It's because all the old foggies at the BBC were to busy drinking earl grey breakfast tea to worry about what year it was. So they were "i'll have another sugar cube" instead.

    6. Re:Units of measure by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      What, you expect US readers to be able to handle an exotic measurement like a cubic centimeter? Please.

      (US readers: a cubic centimeter is a 'metric' measurement equivalent to about 1/44 jigger.)

    7. Re:Units of measure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an Athlon 2100+ which I bought back in 2002 when it was brand new. After installing it, I experienced frequent lockups as the CPU overheated under heavy loads. I bought a new heatsink/fan combo (a Thermaltake Volcano 9, which was pretty good at the time) to replace the standard AMD one, but it sounded like a jet turbine at full speed and it only alleviated the problem a little. After that, I underclocked my FSB by only 3MHz (133MHz to 130MHz) and I haven't had a lockup in over a year. The associated drop in performance is unnoticable.

    8. Re:Units of measure by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Shut up you fucking piece of Eurotrash.

      --
      My other car is first.
    9. Re:Units of measure by nmos · · Score: 1

      No kidding. It would be nice if they would use normal units like "3 VW Beetle glove boxes".

    10. Re:Units of measure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most innovative aspect of the space suit was that it's made so your tuxedo doesn't wrinkle under it.

    11. Re:Units of measure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I can't understand is, why didn't "management" come in and screw this all up?

      Considering that the last screw up of a Mars probe involves not converting measurements correctly, "management" had a lot of incentive not to screw up this time around.

    12. Re:Units of measure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rechargeable batteries cease to work

      No, they're supposed to work forever. Or at least that's what my lawyer said when he filed a lawsuit over my nearly four-year-old iPod. It must be true.

    13. Re:Units of measure by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Metric, so even idiots can measure things.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  4. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sugar Lump?

    1. Re:Heh by circusboy · · Score: 1

      Ash:"Gimme some sugar baby."

      now we know why he was lost in time...

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    2. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cadillac first tried that over 20 years ago with poor results (Wikipedia article).
      GM trucks now have this (now much-improved) technology, as well as Chrysler's Hemi, as someone else posted earlier.

  5. Time by maelstrom · · Score: 3, Funny

    I used to be obsessed with accurate clocks, still am for my servers, but after awhile its all relative anyway ;)

    --
    The more you know, the less you understand.
    1. Re:Time by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to tune in a shortwave time-signal station like WWV or CHU to carefully set my computers. Now, with Internet, they just automatically join the DDoS against TL time servers once a week.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no such agency. ;)

    3. Re:Time by bogie · · Score: 1

      "Now, with Internet, they just automatically join the DDoS against TL time servers once a week."

      Oh but the burning question. time.windows.com or time.nist.com?? One for accuracy and one for spite in an attempt to rob MS of bandwidth. Choose wisely.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    4. Re:Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Microsoft" does it with one disc

      I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're not a troll.

      Windows comes on one disc true!

      But then, to do anything useful you're going to need MS Office (3 disks), a development environment/compiler/toolchain (3 disks). . . So you're already at 8 disks and you're not even close to all the applications you get on most linux distros.

      Plus you've just spent >$200 on top of the cost of windows.


    5. Re:Time by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      well, the paper pushers in all governments are trying to shut those radio transmitters down. There used to be one in Rugby, UK but I thinkit's been shut down. Also with the BPL, ham radio is doomed. I think governments are trying to kill any type of communication you don't have to pay for (see attack on VoIP in USA).

    6. Re:Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From TFA which I did not R completely:

      If you did not own a Palm m100, m105, or m125 at some time between June 1, 1999 and May 4, 2005, you are not eligible to make a claim and should not submit a claim form.


      Thankfully, e-mailed receipts are easy to fudge. Thank you, text editors!
    7. Re:Time by kaiidth · · Score: 1
      The 16khz transmitter was shut down: there's a note about it here. The time transmission service though is still up and going strong (and will be for the foreseeable future afaik).

      The note:

      Rugby Radio Station
      At the end of March 2003 Rugby Radio station sent its last commercial message when the 16kHz GBR transmitter was taken out of service.

      This was the original service that the station opened with in 1926 and for which the very tall masts were built. Its high power and low frequency enabled it to contact virtually anywhere in the world. It was used initially for sending telegrams in morse and later telex messages, but was never intended to send speech, unlike the other transmitters on the site. The original transmitter was replaced in 1966.

      Telephone services started on other transmitters in 1927 and as short wave services developed the site east of the A5 was opened from 1953. Short wave transmissions stopped in 2000 when communications with ships moved over to satellite.

      The Rugby Radio Clock transmitter remains in service under contract with the National Physical Laboratory.
    8. Re:Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was curious to find that 5th picture, talking about using insects to control a green swirl of something that appeared somewhere.

      I wish they could visit our lake. Last year it had a huge crop of lemna, shown here

  6. The iAtomicClock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The final development should see a battery-operated system about the size of a sugar lump."

    "DO NOT EAT iAtomicClock"

  7. Actually...... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Funny

    The atomic clock turned 49.9999999999999999999999 today!

    Congratulations ;)

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Actually...... by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

      Damn it. You stole what I was going to say.

    2. Re:Actually...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to be humorous? The atomic clock cannot actually measure time with that level of precision. Try taking off about 6-7 nines after the decimal, and then your comment might actually be funny.

    3. Re:Actually...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try taking a power drill and jamming it into your eye socket about 6-7 times. Then the joke won't be any funnier, but we'll all be laughing anyway.

    4. Re:Actually...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't say this too loud. I live in the Seattle area and know a guy in the storage locker business. A few years back when it was reported that N. Korea had a missle that *might* reach the U.S., he suddenly got flooded with requests for storage space from people wanting to move out of the area quickly. Many of them reported concern that we might get nuked real soon. While this might not necessarily be a bad thing if they took out Fremont, I seriously doubt that it would happen in my lifetime. It's really kind of funny when you think about it - there's the Cascadia Subduction Zone just off the Washington coast just waiting to deliver a magnitude 9.0 quake to this region and these guys are worried about N. Korea. I don't get why people worry about remote possibilities when there are real threats just around the corner.

    5. Re:Actually...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hah, thats funny. i dunno why they didnt see fit to mod that up.

    6. Re:Actually...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that was the Pentium chip?

  8. Lots depend on the clock now by esconsult1 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Official US time Clock

    It seems that more and more of everything is sync'd with this. My clock radio at home auto-updates, clock on the wall, the cellphones, my Linux and Mac PC's and cable box.

    Only thing left are the clocks with a single AA battery on the wall, and at some point they are going to use the pervasive WWVB time signal that is broadcast from Colorado and operated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology

    This technology has really come a long way and is deeply embedded within our lives. Especially if you consider that before the atomic clock, time varied considerably between different locales.

    1. Re:Lots depend on the clock now by interiot · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't forget GPS... to measure distances with radio signals travelling at the speed of light, you need to have very accurate clocks to do the speed * time = distance calculations. Even the cheapest GPS unit is very very accurate, in that it directly syncronizes with the GPS atomic clocks.

    2. Re:Lots depend on the clock now by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      Don't forget banks...today's banks calculate interest down to fractions of a second.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    3. Re:Lots depend on the clock now by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      OTOH I recently took a bit of a vacation. There were no clock radios, linux boxes, or PDA's involved. Let alone networked ones which can get the current time. Ya know what? The Sun, Moon, and Earth still revolved and rotated on their scheculed path. The rest of the galaxy did the clockwork thing. And I didn't worry about any of it. Yeah, there is a time and a place (and I used to use both WWV and DeutscheWelle), and things have come a long ways. But I doubt that changing the way we measure things is going to change an absolute.

      --
      C|N>K
    4. Re:Lots depend on the clock now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like the pun, just throw it on the floor and tampon it.

    5. Re:Lots depend on the clock now by wcdw · · Score: 1

      Super accurate time-keeping is also a critical aspect of the cellular telephone network. In fact, the time you see displayed on many/most cellphones quite likely originated from the GPS sats.

      One can buy a rackmount device which pulls GPS-origin'd time from the CDMA phone signals - see e.g. time.twc.weather.com (a publically accessible NTP server) which has such a device attached.

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
    6. Re:Lots depend on the clock now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nevermind.

      *smacks sarcasm detector, shakes, hears rattling noise*

    7. Re:Lots depend on the clock now by Tim+Browse · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Only thing left are the clocks with a single AA battery on the wall, and at some point they are going to use the pervasive

      Dude, that's so 5 years ago. I just bought a wall clock for my kitchen that takes an AA battery, and it syncs to the UK nuclear clock signal. It's great.

      Cost? 8 pounds.

      A similar clock in my living room does the same thing. The futar is here!

    8. Re:Lots depend on the clock now by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's so 5 years ago. I just bought a wall clock for my kitchen that takes an AA battery, and it syncs to the UK nuclear clock signal. It's great.

      Cost? 8 pounds.


      You don't know the Cost but it weighs 8lbs. Kinda heavy for a clock.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  9. It's been 50 years... by Alien+Venom · · Score: 2, Funny

    and we still don't have time travel. What a shame.

    1. Re:It's been 50 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As some guy said, the only stable state in an universe where time travel is possible is the one where time travel has not been invented.

    2. Re:It's been 50 years... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Sure we do. We're travelling through time(AND space) right now.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:It's been 50 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its because no one can make a DeLorean get to 88 miles per hour BEFORE it breaks down...

    4. Re:It's been 50 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever contemplated that when they tell you that organization X, Y or Z made a mistake that maybe it is an exercise in deception? The public in general is dumb (and that is for all nations). And how are dumb people led? Very easily. Before you go and try to make jokes about agencies/organizations you probably really know nothing about other than sensationalistic news stories you might want to brush up a little on your history of politics and warfare.

      And back on topic. The story is total crap. Yes I'm sure they have an elite hacking crew of 4 people (2 of which remote in from Romania) and have access to all the greatest Tandy 2k technology. This is nothing more than typical NK we are super propaganda. Remember Total Destruction is Inevertibly Inevertible!

    5. Re:It's been 50 years... by Webmoth · · Score: 1

      That's right. Time travel IS possible, but only forward, and only at a 1:1 ratio.

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    6. Re:It's been 50 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just spacecraft: Earth microbes can hitch a ride to Mars on meteorites, too.

      Just as meteorites from Mars are found on Earth (eg. in Antarctica), meteorites from Earth may reach Mars, and these meteorites may carry microbes. Some scientists think there's an exchange of biological material between the two planets.


    7. Re:It's been 50 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you missed out on that whole "relativity" thing then, fucktard?

  10. They got it all wrong! by Psionicist · · Score: 5, Funny

    That article is not precise! The atomic clock is 50.00000100121412235901293409234 years old as I'm writing this.

    1. Re:They got it all wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works by seeing how many PDAs die in a set amount of time, at an atomic scale.

    2. Re:They got it all wrong! by cryptoz · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the article IS precise, or was at the time of writing? You know, /. has normal news stories. Not news stories that are updated every nanosecond to stay accurate...

    3. Re:They got it all wrong! by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Many times they are not updated or accurate.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  11. Units of measure. One lump, or two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll have the most accurate caffine high ever.

  12. It'll be interesting when.... by Circlotron · · Score: 1

    ...atomic clocks are old enough to get classified as antiques & collectibles. Kids with ultra-wristwatches that tell your exact location by relativity effect at walking speed will laugh and laugh. You will be able to by them as cheap gifts for little kids at the $2,000,000,000,000 shop without a second thought.

    1. Re:It'll be interesting when.... by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There really is no market for atomic clocks. At best you will get devices that sync themselves to an atomic clock, that's located far away. Even people that do have pretty accurate clocks are always late. I find that in general, most people are late, and don't really worry too much about time in the first place. Really gets on my nerves, as i'm always on time, and always have to wait for someone.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:It'll be interesting when.... by Circlotron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as I was writing I was thinking you would still be late for work no matter what. Heh heh. Seeing time is not constant everywhere, atomic clocks are going to get out of sync. Nobody would be right. What's all this UCT (Universal Co-ordinated Time) stuff? No such thing really ;-)

    3. Re:It'll be interesting when.... by aklix · · Score: 1

      I believe time travels slower at the equator than at the polls. It's only changes the point of a second in a long time, but it's not nearly 20 million years, so what's the point of having clocks that accurate to brodcast across multiple lattitudes?

    4. Re:It'll be interesting when.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time only has meaning when its relative. Otherwise we wouldn't have a leap year, and we wouldn't have nice even 24 hour days.

    5. Re:It'll be interesting when.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They just decided to get the repost out of the way now by reposting into the same article!

      It's ingenious!/p

    6. Re:It'll be interesting when.... by Webmoth · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I believe time travels slower at the equator than at the polls."

      I don't know about that. When I was standing in line at the polls back in November, time seemed to drag on. Now, afterwards, it's dragging on even longer while we here in Washington State are still wondering who our governor is.

      What's that? You meant poles? My mistake.

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    7. Re:It'll be interesting when.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm always on time, and always have to wait for someone.

      Good! I'm contemplating a purchase. Would you kindly read all volumes of encyclopedia britannica by tomorrow and return here to give me a summary at the same exact time this post was submitted.

      Thank you, I'll be waiting.

    8. Re:It'll be interesting when.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Kids with ultra-wristwatches that tell your exact location by relativity effect at walking speed will laugh and laugh."

      I'm pretty sure that's impossible. Sorry.

      What is interesting is that these new sugar-cube sized clocks will help us launch 1000s of GPS satellites instead of the few 10s we have now.

    9. Re:It'll be interesting when.... by Detritus · · Score: 1

      There is still a market for atomic clocks. An atomic clock provides two services, the current time and an extremely stable and accurate oscillator. Many applications, like the telephone system, may not care about the current time, but they need very high quality frequency standards to keep the network synchronized. Even if periodically synchronized to a remote atomic clock, the quality of the time provided by a local clock is heavily dependent on the stability of its oscillator.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  13. w00t by azbrdhntr · · Score: 1

    thank you for ore abilty to micro manage our lves

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  14. Caesium? by nxtr · · Score: 1

    How the hell do the British see see-zee-umm in that? Tsai-sai-umm?

    1. Re:Caesium? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Same way they see pronounce, Caesar. Like the salad, or the roman guy. Anyway, here's a good one for you. Aluminium. Think about that one for a while. It's actually pronounced how it's spelled.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Caesium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By not being fucking braindead morons with nil heritage.

    3. Re:Caesium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Caesium? by kabbor · · Score: 1
      The vowel ae - it should be æ - is the same as in the word encyclopædia and Cæsar. I've never heard it pronounced as anything else but as a long 'e'.

      Of course, to be sure, a Latin professor would have to tell us how to pronounce caesius, (light blue), as that's the origin of the name.

      Lastly, the spelling cesium is reluctanly accepted as a US spelling.

    5. Re:Caesium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discoverer, Sir Humphry Davy, actually named the element 'aluminum'. This is the spelling still used in the USA today, but in many other English speaking nations (including Australia) we spell the word with an extra letter: 'aluminium'. (from http://www.aluminium-cans.com.au/Facts.html)

    6. Re:Caesium? by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Latin, the AE is pronouned like an "ai" dipthong and c's are always hard consonants. So Caesar would be pronounced like "Kaiser" and by analogy Caesium would be pronounced "Kaisium."

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    7. Re:Caesium? by drxray · · Score: 1

      http://www.eaa.net/home.jsp?content=/material/hist ory.htm

      The original name was ALUMIUM, the entirely logical extension of the metal salt called alum. Aluminum and Aluminium are both versions with mangled spelling so they are easier to pronounce.

      --
      Slashdot - Mutual Assured Discussion
    8. Re:Caesium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you haven't already bought (an AMD Athlon 64 4000+), just make sure to get one with a Winchester or Venus core.

      Nitpick: the 90nm 4000+ is a San Diego core. 1MB L2 cache is San Diego, 512MB L2 90nm E3 core is Venice, D-series core is Winchester (older 3000+ to 3500+). (You have to be this geeky to get a 4-digit /. ID. It's a law.)

      I did the same thing you did. I've got a Winchester core 3000+ in my 64-bit Fedora Core server. You can cut power consumption even more with a high efficiency power supply, Seasonic S12's being the absolute best (Newegg carries them). They made a very noticible difference over the Antecs I used to use. Using a 6600GT rather than a 6800GT video card made a huge difference too.

    9. Re:Caesium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Plenty of evidence abounds for what you are talking about. Unfortunately, the Earth as a closed system can't handle the current load, much less the future.

      We passed the point of fully "sustainable" around 1850 or so - every year after that we produced more waste products that can be broken down by natural processes in a year. I'm not talking about CO2 or iPods here - I'm talking about vegetable matter and human waste. Heat is another consideration as well - our current use of energy produces significant amounts of heat and not all of it is radiated into space.

      To consider a "sustainable" environment and a closed system you are going to have to look at how things are going to be in several hundred years. Recycling is going to be a big deal, because the energy required to smelt ore into "new" metal isn't going to be around. Nor would any right-thinking individual let someone produce the waste products and heat from lighting up a forge. Why would you anyway, when you can just go over to the dump and pick up something ready to be "reclaimed"? Remember, that if we really want "sustainable" we better start thinking about some significant population reductions. Quickly, too.

      Pollution and waste management are but one side of the equation - the other is input resources. We can spend money today on the future and building our ability to obtain resources from elsewere, or we can spend money today on reducing the population so we don't have to later. There is a third alternative - let everyone keep knocking up their Significant Other and having 14 children. Especially popular in third-world countries. We will, of course, drown in our own waste products if we don't bake from our own waste heat.

      The population in 1850 was less than 100 million people. At that level we can be 100% fully "sustainable" and the natural processes on the planet will recycle all of the waste products. Waste heat won't be a problem either. We just need to decide between "open" or "closed" system and plan for the future. Should we decide on "closed", we better start reducing the population, drastically, and soon.


    10. Re:Caesium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that movie with Clint Eastwood was true after all!

    11. Re:Caesium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You think things are less paranoid now? There's more orbital surveillance now than ever! This is "quaint" only because it assumed that orbital surveillance required somebody to be physically present.

      Back in the 40s and 50s, there was a lot of talk about doing things like surveillance (you can see a lot) and communications (a lot of people can see you) from orbit. One common assumption (which turned out to be correct) was that these things would be extremely important in the near future. Another assumption (which turned out to be totally wrong) was that this would be done by sending people to go live in orbit. Once there, they'd use photography, electronics, and other technology that wouldn't be much more advanced that what people were familiar with. You can see this in Arthur C. Clarke's original proposals for communications satellites and in fiction from Clarke, Heinlen, and others.

      What really happened, of course, is that rocket technology progressed relatively slowly, while electronics progressed very rapidly. So long before it was practical to a space station in orbit, it was practical to put a simple electronic gadget in orbit that would do all those chores pretty cheaply. Kind of sad, really -- if building better rockets had been more of an economic and military necessity, we'd probably be the space-going civilization that eveybody back in the 50s assumed we would be.

      Then again, the need to build smaller and more reliable electronics did a lot to jump-start the computer revolution -- so we mustn't complain too much!/p

    12. Re:Caesium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind, though, that working on OSS projects applies as 'experience'. If you're fresh out of school with the ink still wet on your CS degree, working for OSS for a while will most definitely get you a higher starting salary when you put it on your Resume.

      Unless you go to work for SCO or MS.

    13. Re:Caesium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who moderated that funny?

      I was searching for a way of calling the original Dr. Byeon Jae-jeong quote 'paranoid ravings'. You did it so much better.

      I think it's a kinda funny reference to http://realultimatepower.net/.
  15. can you recall the scene ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Four scientists, as they flip the switch on their new invention ...

    #1: Gee, Ed, it looks like it works ...
    #2: Bob, you're right! It's counting! We did it!
    #1: It seems to be right on, let's fire up the chronotaph ...
    #3: Already there, Bob, I have a solid register, five-nines. I started the paper before you hit the button.
    #1: Good thinking, Stan. This is one for the record books!
    #2: This is a clock for your ass, Ed! I guess we should set it now.
    #4: Okay guys (looks at watch) what have you got? I'm showing a quarter past two.

  16. Net data? by stevenvi · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    "As net data is split in data streams and reassembled, for instance, the timing has to correct at the point of re-assembly.

    If not, whatever data has been sent - voice packets in VoIP net phone calls for example - will come out garbled.
    "

    Did anyone else laugh as they read this? The writer of this article is unaware of sequence numbers... (and thinks that a timestamp is placed on each packet instead.) Wow. But this could also work with the computer's internal clock... though then all routing devices would have to be initialised to the same time. But I digress...

    1. Re:Net data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree 100%, the earth is flat.

    2. Re:Net data? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Did anyone else laugh as they read this? The writer of this article is unaware of sequence numbers... (and thinks that a timestamp is placed on each packet instead.)

      No, because he's essentially correct.

      In VoIP protocols, a timestamp *is* placed in every packet along with a sequence number. The timestamp is used to place the incoming audio and video packets in the correct order with regard to time. The sequence number is used to detect packet loss. So basically, sequence numbers don't help you with jitter. The timestamp is use to actually calculate the amount of jitter, so it's rather important for it to be as accurate as possible.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    3. Re:Net data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I used to never like apple, but my opinion of them is starting to change. I dont see their products as superior, but I do consider them acceptable nowdays.

      I bought an iPod Photo 60GB. Within a month the thing crashed. And I dont mean crashed, where you hit two buttons and it reboots. (that happened the day i got it.) I mean crashed as in it wont reboot, the battery didnt charge, and winblows didnt recognize it. For all intents and purposes it was an expensive brick.

      I sent it back and they fixed it for free, got it back to me in just a few days.

      The thing still crashes occasionaly but now the two button reset always does the job.

      Moral of the story: apples good, but not perfect./p

    4. Re:Net data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the principle has some merit, the authors of the article picked the worst possible example. AFAIK the Athlon 4000+ is still manufactured in 130 nm technology ("Clawhammer"), and it is not exactly cheap. For less money, you can get an Athlon 3800+ with the new Venice core (90nm technology) which uses MUCH less power than the 4000+.
      Unfortunately, the article does not give any numbers on the actual power consumption or ambient temperature, so we have to look elswhere:
      LostCircuits http://www.lostcircuits.com/cpu/amd_venice/ has some actual measurements of CPU power usage.
      The guys found out that the Venice/3800+ uses less than half the power of the Clawhammer/4000+. The actual clock frequency is the same for both processors, 2.4GHz.
      To top it off, they found that the 3800+ showed slightly better overall performance than the 4000+. It seems that the detail improvements that went into the Venice core do more than compensate the Venice's smaller cache.

  17. Fifty huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just turned fifty (give or take ten seconds.)

  18. Now we should all thank Dave Mills... by e9th · · Score: 3, Funny

    because without NTP, we might as well be using sundials.

    1. Re:Now we should all thank Dave Mills... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CIA? That blows any sort of credibility in the report. The CIA doesnt run "hakcers", the Department of Defense does, HQ'd on an Airforce base. It was publicised back in April in this article

  19. How long ago would it have been... by Circlotron · · Score: 1

    ...if nobody was actually measuring the time? I say zero and fifty years concurrently.

    1. Re:How long ago would it have been... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree 100%. I went through a bit of work to explain this to PCstats before I noticed that others on slashdot noticed the same thing I did. The information below may be redundant, but shows more detail.

  20. You know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After 50 years the first atomic clock will have lost, what, a few thousands of a second?

  21. Setting the clock initially by xtapalapaquetl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a question that must get asked a lot, and I wasn't able to find an answer (casually searching) on the gov website.

    How did they figure out how to set the clock initially? Thanks.

    1. Re:Setting the clock initially by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's like asking how does the "clock" in your computer get set to the right time. (Not the system clock, the crystal that generates the clock frequency the electronics operate off of).

      Atomic clocks just "tick", not display an actual time. They provide an extremely reliable and high frequency tick which makes them so valuable.
      =Smidge=

    2. Re:Setting the clock initially by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      The atomic clock is not an absolute timekeeping device.
      It is simply a very accurate counter.

      Your question remains valid, and I have just wasted 23.3945738453784578346578345 seconds pondering and writing this post.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Setting the clock initially by Al+Clocker · · Score: 1

      They probably used whatever was the most accurate clock at the time. It doesn't really matter. Better clocks allow you to measure time intervals more accurately, they don't help much with absolute time. Absolute time is just an artifact that is defined by committee.

    4. Re:Setting the clock initially by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atomic clocks just "tick", not display an actual time.

      No. The atoms do the "ticking". A clock tells you time, atomic or otherwise.

    5. Re:Setting the clock initially by prodangle · · Score: 3, Informative
      How did they figure out how to set the clock initially? Thanks.

      Atomic clocks count the number of vibrations within an atom, so know how much time has passed to a high degree of accuracy. Absolute time however, cannot really be known, as we have no reference point to measure it from (unless we find someone who has been counting since the big bang happened!).

      The standard day-to-day time system is UTC (rather mysteriously standing for Coordinated Universal Time) and it is based on the rotation of the earth. This is decided by the BIPM. As the length of a day is not precisely divisible by a second, leap seconds occasioanlly have to be added.

    6. Re:Setting the clock initially by fermion · · Score: 3, Informative
      Ok, there are two issues with clocks. The first is the length of certain interval of time, the other is exactly how we communicate that it is a certain time of day.

      Atomic clocks were primarily developed to deal with former, measuring the passage of time. This turns out to be a very important and difficult problem in all fields of science and engineering. The reason is that any error is measureing the passing of time will be amplified and make all other things very wrong.

      So, after using the sun, water, gears, and springs, someone finally figured out that if certain atoms were excited, they would vibrate very regularly. By counting the vibrations, we could measure the passage of time.

      Now, we don't measure time in vibrations of an atom. We measure the passage of time in seconds. So how long is a second? The hand waving definition is the second is 1/60 of a hour, and the hour is 1/24 of a day, so we count the vibrations over a day, then divide by 24, and divide again by 60, that is the vibrations in a second. Of course we have to decide how to measure a day without using a clock! This can be done, and after much argument, the scientist just give up and agree on thier best guess. The key thing is that everyone agrees on how many vibrations are in a second, so we are now able to say difinitively that something takes a second, or 10 seonds, or 100 seconds, or 1.2352 seconds.

      So, the measurement of the passing of time is important to science, and even important to the making sure that you don't spend an extra second in class or at work, but what does this have to do with your question, which is getting to work or class on time.

      Well, ultimately that is just a decision we make. There are standard clocks that measure time in universal time(UT), which used to called greenwich mean time(GMT). This time is adjusted geographically so that 8:00 am does occur in the middle of the night in the US. And that is they key. We set the time so that 8:00 am is in the morning, and 8:00 pm is always when most good children are in bed.

      How we set time, so to speak, was done by looking a the sun and the moon. You can in fact look up the data for sunrise and sunset in your area and set your clocks by this phenomemom. This is the same thing we do with calendars and seasons. Much is set around the longest and shortest days of the year. For instance, the day in which there is an equal amount of sunlight and darkness is called the equinox, and this day that occurs in the northern hemisphere, when the amount of daylight is icreasing, is curently called March 20 or 21, and is the first day of spring.

      It is interesting that that while we have had accurate clocks for a long time, that is we can accurately measure a second, syncronization has a been a problem. For years we have radio signals to synchronize enabled clocks, but now with the internet we can all be on the same time. Although for some reason some clocks are still set a few minutes off in either direction.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    7. Re:Setting the clock initially by AFairlyNormalPerson · · Score: 3, Funny

      "How did they figure out how to set the clock initially? Thanks." They killed Christ. You're welcome.

    8. Re:Setting the clock initially by Detritus · · Score: 1

      They used astronomical observations. Observatories like Greenwich and the USNO have special telescopes that are designed to detect the exact moment that a star crosses the zenith. This gives you an accurate measurement of the Earth's rotation in the celestial frame of reference.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    9. Re:Setting the clock initially by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post would sound more authoritative if you got the number of seconds in an hour right.

      There are 60 seconds per minute, and 60 minutes per hour, or 3600 seconds per hour. You managed to make that mistake twice. That's equal parts impressive and pathetic.

    10. Re:Setting the clock initially by todorb · · Score: 0

      Absolute time however, cannot really be known

      last time i talked with my friend einstein, he told me that there was no such thing like absolute time. :)

    11. Re:Setting the clock initially by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The problems we face in terms of climate change and shifts in the parameters of the biosphere are matters of conjecture. Apologists from any one camp can float an argument to support their agenda. It's reminescent of Winston Churchill's quip: "These, gentlemen, are the opinions upon which I base my facts." In a political arena opinions are as likely to take the day as are facts.

      Maybe the point to be highlighted is one of judgement. If you're crossing a rope bridge, over an abyss, and, you think it's showing signs of giving way, do you sprint for the other side or do you go gingerly, testing as you go, looking for more proof of what's happening? In the first world, the infrastructure that maintains our lifestyle is not ruggedly robust, or, highly redundant. Redundancy as a concept is, historically, only yesterday's news. The internet is an example of an infrastructure built with redundancy in mind. So, if the biosphere is showing signs of change, do we hope for benign change and/or for science to sprint to the rescue? Sir Francis Bacon Will climate change force a parameter shift that will invite a runaway state? The concept of key species tells us that specific species are necessary to maintaining the ecology of an eco niche. Could climate change destroy key species and cause collapse of ecosystems. This brings on the old bogey man of the domino effect.

      Change is inevitable, so it's really a matter of placing your bet on science as the ultimate super hero, or, do we begin to exercise caution now to mitigate against change. After all there's no place like home./p

    12. Re:Setting the clock initially by a1englishman · · Score: 1
      Atomic clocks count the number of vibrations within an atom
      It would suck to find out you have a defective atom.
    13. Re:Setting the clock initially by Jivecat · · Score: 1
      On each corner of Union Station in Chicago are clocks that say "Elgin" and "Central Time" on their faces. Elgin is the name of the clock company based in the western suburb of the same name, and I used to make a (dumb) nerd joke to myself that the clocks told not merely the time, but "Elgin Central Time," as if that was something extra special.

      Then one day while I was out in Elgin on a site visit, I ran across the Elgin Watch Company's transit observatory, where daily star sightings were taken to provide accurate time measurements to clocks throughout the Elgin network, which received updates via "ticker" (unintended, unfortunate pun) service. Turns out Union Station really did display Elgin Central Time!

      Of course, the observatory was closed in 1958 when it was made obsolete by... atomic clocks.

      --
      "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."--Feynman
  22. When you first buy an atomic clock by LadyLucky · · Score: 1
    Does it blink 12:00??

    Seriously... how do you set the time on one of them?

    --
    dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    1. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      They automagicly set themselves, I believe.

    2. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Seriously... how do you set the time on one of them?

      It's just like the clock radio in your bedroom, except the up and down arrow buttons only nudge the time by 1 femtosecond per click.

    3. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      It's just like the clock radio in your bedroom, except the up and down arrow buttons only nudge the time by 1 femtosecond per click.

      So what if the clock is 780,000,000 femtoseconds off? How many operations are those little buttons good for?

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
    4. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by compm375 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they have nanosecond buttons too...

    5. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by tooth · · Score: 1
      IIt's just like the clock radio in your bedroom, except the up and down arrow buttons only nudge the time by 1 femtosecond per click.

      I get annoyed with normal clock-radios that don't have a reverse button and I have to go all the way around again when I miss the correct time ... having a one femto-second ajustment would take forver to get back around!

    6. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Density, certainly. Archimedes figured that one out, and he didn't even take first-year physics.


      If the new bone is also off-center, or is not uniformly distributed, it would also change the center of mass, which would also be fairly easy to detect.


      Not sure what imaging techniques would work on fossilized bone, but since there may be organic matter inside the bone, then all you really need to do is image that and see what the gaps are. I don't know if any MRI techniques would be usable, such as something similar to that used on King Tut, but there's probably something that could pick out the organic matter.


      Like you say, there may well be other characteristics you can pick out, provided you can definitely identify some males as well as definitely identifying some females. (You've got to know what traits are not common across groups, not just what traits any given group has.)


      So, yeah, the situation isn't quite as bleak as is presented, although it will certainly require a lot of creative thought on the part of the paleantologists./p

    7. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      i remember they had a couple of atomic clock units (clocks not just oscilators) on the royal instituation chrsitmas lecutres series (broadcast on the bbc) and they had some kind of computer setup that they could use to bring them very very close to synchronised.

      with the expermental uses theese clocks get put too its not about the absoloute set time its about synchronising the clocks then haveing them behave in a very consistant matter from then on (obviously allowing for relativistic effects from moving the clocks)

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unless you have an iPod broken for some other reason, I think the recycling is a bum deal.

      Or if you were planning to buy a new one anyway and your old one was going to end up in a landfill. It looks like Apple is begining to get ahead of the curve as there are several states that are forcing computer manufacturers to either recycle old equipment at the time of purchase or pay a hefty tax to pay for the state's recycling program. I can easily see these laws spreading to any rechargeable battery powered device, as battery disposal and recycling is a major headache for local governments. With this program in place, Apple is ready if such laws become widespread.

      My Dad worked for the EPA for twenty years and I remember I had a conversation with him in the eighties where he predicted that sometime in my lifetime, all purchases would have to include the cost of disposal in addition to the cost of production. There's a finite amount of space to store trash. Perhaps he was right./p

    9. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      WTF are you talking about?

    10. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by mog007 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "Atomic Clocks" that you buy arn't actully using atomic methods of vibrating cesium atoms to check the time, they're just radio receivers.

    11. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Mars has a different length day than Earth (40 minutes longer), the engineers are sometimes working very odd hours (since the rover is only active during daylight on Mars).

      Aside from that I imagine they wanted to get it out as soon as possible since they have no idea how long its batteries will last, and it can't do any work while it's stuck. Perhaps they spent the off hours doing simulations and tests to figure out how to get it out.

    12. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really not trying to be a troll here, but I'm wondering: What was the rush? Sure, this needed to get done, but why the need to work extra-long hours to do it? What would have happened if it took an extra month or two? (I read the article linked to with the text 'engineers were praised' and was not enlightened)

    13. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just spacecraft: Earth microbes can hitch a ride to Mars on meteorites, too.

      Just as meteorites from Mars are found on Earth (eg. in Antarctica), meteorites from Earth may reach Mars, and these meteorites may carry microbes. Some scientists think there's an exchange of biological material between the two planets.


    14. Re:When you first buy an atomic clock by Blrfl · · Score: 1

      Does it blink 12:00??

      I have several HP 5071As, and if the clock's not set, they show no time at all.

      Seriously... how do you set the time on one of them?

      From the front panel. I think HP put the clock on it as a gag, because there's no highly-accurate way to set it. The 5071's primary purpose is to provide extremely accurate 10 MHz and 1 PPS references. There are other gadgets that can derive the time from GPS to within 10 ns of UTC and will steer the oscillator on the 5071 to that spec.

      Pretty cool stuff.

  23. What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    50 years from now will we be talking about the birthday of the subatomic clock?

  24. Re:happy birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haa-ha!

  25. question by DietFluffy · · Score: 1

    sometimes you will read about how the most accurate clock in the world is accurate to within 1 second every 30 million years or so. if it is already the most accurate clock, how would they know this?

    1. Re:question by Al+Clocker · · Score: 1

      The best way to evaluate a clock's accuracy is to build several, and then compare them. The amount by which they differ after some interval tells you how good the clocks are. Of course that method relies on the assumption that the errors of different clocks are uncorrelated. The physics of these clocks is very well understood though, so the claim is that no known physical processes will cause correlated errors.

    2. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the reasons we removed Saddam from power was to prevent him from getting nuclear weapons and becoming another Kim Jong-il. You seem to ask why we didn't liberate North Korea instead of Iraq. The reason is simple - if we go after North Korea then millions of our allies in South Korea will die. Seoul is very close to the border, and NK has a ton of missiles aimed at the SK capital right now - possibly some nuclear missiles. Right now the only way to deal with NK is to use diplomacy and to isolate Jong-il from the rest of the world. As each year passes, the world advances and becomes richer while NK stays stuck in 1950 forever. We can afford to wait this one out.

    3. Re:question by iabervon · · Score: 2, Informative

      The definition of the second is now based on the physical quantity that atomic clocks measure, so the clocks are, when functioning properly, correct by definition. They can therefore just look at how much agreement a bunch of clocks have with each other. That is, they don't have to worry about the issue of all of the clocks being systematically fast or slow, like if they were mechanical watches which could all be consistant, but all tick at a rate different from a second, because the second is defined such that this is not the case.

    4. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statistics. That figure comes from the amount of uncertainty in measurement. The cesium doesn't vary, but the ability to measure such itsy bitsy things does. Like if you had to count all the grains of sand in a tupperware. It would be a huge pain in the ass and you'd miss a bunch of them. That's kind of an analogy. It's just hard to count things like that without making a few mistakes.

  26. Strontium Clock by rakeem · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone see that article a couple of weeks ago in New Scientist about Strontium atoms held in standing waves generated by 6 lasers? Mental. A 50 time more accurate (or something).

    1. Re:Strontium Clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Dork, I didn't.

      =]

    2. Re:Strontium Clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok they're pretty accurate, but what happens when physical plant unplugs the machine to get power for the floor waxer?

    3. Re:Strontium Clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>The REAL question that should be asked, is why do you have those enemies in the first place. Answer that question and you have solved the problem.

      I think that the USSR was considered an enemy because we were in the way of them accomplishing their stated goal of world conquest. They threatened to nuke us several times if we interfered.

      It was soooo long ago; maybe it didn't happen.../

  27. Re:What if? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laugh while you can monkey-boy. It'll all be the same in 2038.

  28. Actually... by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    After 50 years the first atomic clock will have lost, what, a few thousands of a second?

    it could just as easily have gained a few thousanths of a second. It was only the first one, so it could have been pretty inaccurate.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, one of my good friends works a second job at a large electronics retailer, and he said they had a "large number of returns" of the 60GB model of the iPod photo. None of the other models were affected. He suspects they had a bad production run of the 60GB microdrives in them, and Apple hasn't openly acknowledged it yet (perhaps because it's such a limited issue).

    2. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely return it! Depending on what country you live in, your warranty may be two years, one year, or 90 days. And in some US states there are "fitness of merchantability" laws - if it fails after the warranty expires but well before it should, you may still have the right for free repair, replacement, or refund. (I used these laws when my cell phone failed out of warranty, due to an obvious manufacturing defect.)

      Of course if you dropped it from your tree house, you're up the creek without an iPod.

    3. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the headline, inaccurate as it is.

      NASA Discovers Space Spies From the 60's

      No, NASA discovers SPACE SUITS from the 60's. It's not like there were a bunch of astronauts tucked away in a closet somewhere waiting for the "go" signal.

    4. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..when the Apollo 12 crew brought back a camera from Surveyor 3. Some microorganisms survived a few years on the moon. See a nasa page for details.

  29. I guess this is a good time to mention... by Ann+Elk · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:I guess this is a good time to mention... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      It's not very stylish, but it certainly is more accurate than a Rolex... but then again so is my $5 Casio wristwatch.

    2. Re:I guess this is a good time to mention... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If you call that a "wristwatch", wait until you see what kind of "girlfriend" that will get ya.

    3. Re:I guess this is a good time to mention... by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

      Actually, the guy has to be pretty buff to demonstrate that atomic "wristwatch". Lots of girls like a buy with both brains *and* brawn.

    4. Re:I guess this is a good time to mention... by bogie · · Score: 1

      In case you felt like buying one.
      http://we.home.agilent.com/USeng/nav/-11265.536880 128/pd.html

      At that price why not buy two?

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    5. Re:I guess this is a good time to mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard of Whoppix and the Wireless Auditor CD?
      Watch the video on the Whoppix site, 0 to cracking WEP in 10 minutes. Way cool video to watch.

    6. Re:I guess this is a good time to mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you (or slashdot server) accidently mis-posted this message to the wrong topic.

    7. Re:I guess this is a good time to mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://reprap.org/

      This would make a better type of bot wars, building their weapons with available materials and blasting each other with them heh

  30. I wished TV stations used amotic times. by antdude · · Score: 1

    So, most of the non-live TV shows are on time. It is probably impossible. :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:I wished TV stations used amotic times. by w9wi · · Score: 1

      The station I work for uses GPS time.

      The programs start late on purpose.

      (I guess if you're in management it makes sense.....)

    2. Re:I wished TV stations used amotic times. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a couple other reasons you're missing for why people might choose the iPod. For one, it's the only one that plays iTunes Music Store files. Regardless of anyone's personal feelings against the store, it's still the most popular and largest music store online, and people might want to use it and then get an iPod to listen to the songs.

      Also, on the Mac, the iPod is still the best choice in many respects. Virtually every Mac user uses iTunes, and between that and prevalent Firewire ports, it's just a lot easier to use an iPod that's almost guaranteed to work rather than another solution which is designed largely from a Windows standpoint (there may be other ways of loading music, like direct disk access, but most non-iPod devices are still designed for Windows first).

      So, there are a number of valid reasons why people may choose the iPod over the competition, regardless of whether they think it's "cool" or not. The average consumer doesn't want a litany of features that they may never use. Most of them are focused on simplicity, and especially if they own a Mac, the iPod usually comes out on top for them.

    3. Re:I wished TV stations used amotic times. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The temperature measurements in the article don't seem to be relative, and yet they say things like this:
      for a 66% drop in speed there was a 20% drop in temperature.

      In this context, talking about a 20% drop in temperature in degrees celsius makes no sense for comparison purposes. They go on to state that "a 43% drop in voltage producing a 20% drop in heat seems more reasonable", but this is assuming that the temperature drop corresponds to a equal reduction in heat output.

      - Brian.
  31. Article could be more specific. by icepick72 · · Score: 1
    ... the atomic clock, is celebrating its 50th year.

    Fine but what nanosecond does its birthday roll over?

    1. Re:Article could be more specific. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They would rather have famine than an attempt to save these people.

      No, we'd rather do something OTHER than invading and killing untold thousands and/or start a war with a nuclear power. See how you felt on 9.11? That's how other people feel when you attack them. Iraq was completely predictable, and you want to incite more hatred? The very thing that led to 9.11? Are you fucking insane or something?

      The U.S. even allows left-wing propaganda such as farenheit 9/11 to be played in movie theaters across the country.

      That made me smile. Do you think that is in someway special or unique in the world? Are you looking for a medal or something? Wake up my friend, people elsewhere in the west generally have more rights and freedom than you do now.

      It seems most protesters would rather live in the U.S. and bitch about how shitty it is to live here than actually move to a country they seem to think is better (which is probably because they don't know of one).

      Emm, no. Firstly, anyone on the planet has a right to bitch about you unstablising it. So by definition the majority of the protesters DON'T live in the US. I know it's hard to believe as it's contary to your flag-alleging educational upbringing, but most of the world do not live in America. I wouldn't want to live in the US, nice place to visit and all, but you guys are quite freedom-hating to be honest. Most of Europe doesn't have equivalent legistaltion to the liberty bashing stuff you guys seem to be passing these days. And why should any American feel compelled to leave? I thought the "unique" (lol) idea of your country was that you were able to think differently, and promote those views? Sound's like what you are promoting is fasism, where those that feel different to you should leave. That's quite un-American, if you don't mind me pointing that out./p

    2. Re:Article could be more specific. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not molten rock in the upper mantle. The article itself says the temperature only gets to about 100 C. Considering how long it takes to get down so far, and the remote location (middle of the pacific ocean) I doubt getting energy from a small hole would be very practical.

  32. Actually, its by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    49.999999999999999999923409

    1. Re:Actually, its by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone noticed that their comments section (12 languages, 8 architectures)!

  33. Funny. I don't feel older by gmac63 · · Score: 1

    I guess I'm just not getting all this timekeeping stuff. I've been aroud for over 1,308,744,000+ seconds and I still don't _feel_ any older...

    --

    INSERT INTO comment VALUE('Doh!') WHERE user='you';
    1. Re:Funny. I don't feel older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it draws a whopping 54 watts average

      Oops... Just to clarify, the entire system, including power supply losses, draws that much. The CPU itself, from what I've read (published numbers seem to vary a LOT, and I'd love to see some hard data on the min, mean, and max draw of the 90nm Athlon 64s), only eats between 7 and 35W (for comparison, the Pentium III line came in at the low 30s) with a theoretical max somewhere in the 60W range.


      Kinda funny, actually... When everyone talks about needing bigger and better power supplies, with 400W considered a bare minimum and 600W not all that uncommon these days, I upgraded from an old P-III system and the total power consumption of the system dropped by half.

    2. Re:Funny. I don't feel older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think common sense is evidence enough. This is happening on a world scale, unless you can point out areas of the planet's surface that have been devoid of human interaction over the last 20-30 years. As far as seasons go, the effects that the study concentrates on tend to be long-term rather than seasonal, so seasonal evidence would be pointless.

      Look at the basic facts; we are on a planet with finite resources. World population is growing, and human consumption of resources is growing.

      Long term, the math doesn't work out. It's not a case of if we screw up this planet, it's a case of when, and more people equals acceleration towards that point, more space used, more fuels used, more products consumed.

      The main problem is that as a planet, we all have to act to make it a sustainable environment. This means actually reducing what we use, not slowing down, or keeping it the same, but actually reducing the amount of resources we use. If one country *cough* decides to ignore this fact, it undermines the point of the exercise.

      As far as your comment about hippies who want the developing countries to starve to death; well, they already do starve. But if world poverty was wiped out tomorrow the world over, the developed world would have to change its consumptive habits overnight for the world to sustain itself.

      At the end of the day, everything on this planet is not okay, and all of our eggs are in one basket.

    3. Re:Funny. I don't feel older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who moderated that funny?

      I was searching for a way of calling the original Dr. Byeon Jae-jeong quote 'paranoid ravings'. You did it so much better.

      I think it's a kinda funny reference to http://realultimatepower.net/.
  34. and all the staff.. by Zeussy · · Score: 1

    and all the staff had a surpise birthday party for the bi-centinary birthday.

    Although the surpise was too much for dear old atomic, and his ticker stopped ticking. He was rushed to hospital where he had a pacemaker installed. He has lost several hours which officials have decided to relocate him to a warmer climate on a different timezone to make up for the difference.

    The operation and pacemaker will not shorten the expected lifespan of atomic.

    1. Re:and all the staff.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you tried the debian installer,"r"); i=~getchar(); putchar(getc(c)^~i)); }

    2. Re:and all the staff.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Planned obsolesence? Is this instead of using the magic batteries everyone else has that last forever?

      Sure, it would be nicer to get inside the case without having to use some sort of industrial clamping device, but I don't think Apple did that as a timed self-destruct mechanism.


      Then, why do you suppose that Apple designed the iPod that way?

  35. So today is its birthday... by Kagura · · Score: 1

    Now, tell me exactly when it first became operational, down to the precise NANOSECOND!

    1. Re:So today is its birthday... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At 0.

      Duh.

  36. One cubic centimeter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GOD DAMN YOU SONS OF BITCHES! How hard is it to say, "one cubic centimeter"?

    Anyway, isn't time to update the measurement of a "second" from the cesium atom? 1/9,192,631,770 is pretty vague in this day and age. Especially when france is "responsible" for all the "standards", and Paris is a city of change.

    I say go for cobolt-60. Hell, it updates itself enough for Paris, with or without Joan.

  37. The better question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Does it run Linux?

  38. Not be confused with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Board of Directors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists other nuclear clock

  39. Atomic Clock Turns 50 by citking · · Score: 3, Funny
    Atomic Clock Turns 50

    Uh huh, that's what it wants us to think....

    --
    "This food is problematic."
  40. Things I wonder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They might just "tick".. but you want them to tick at the right moment. otherwise you'd have two atomic clocks both accurate to themselves but off by as much as a second-- assuming you've got them synced to each other within a second or so..

    With latency in relating the time from one atomic clock to another (I'd bet even the speed of light would factor in when syncing a new atomic clock to an old one), I wonder how they do it. They'd have to be very, very, confident in the accuracy of the lag. I also wonder how they set the first one in the 1940s.. ie, what did they use as a reference?

    1. Re:Things I wonder. by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Not only is the speed of light a problem, but relitivity as well. If you put the atomic clock on a train and send it thirty miles down the track it would lose time.

      Setting the first one was easy. They just checked their wristwatches. Its not as important that the clock have the correct time, as it is that it keeps the correct time.

  41. Now... by ilyanep · · Score: 0

    The atomic clock tells us what time it is, so no longer does time dictate what time it is, the atomic clock does. So, of course we never really now what time it really is. Especially because it's all relative to the Earth's orbit around the sun which, for all we know, could be decaying.

    --
    ~Ilyanep
    To get message, take amount of carrier pigeons at each stage mod 2. Then decode binary.
  42. It need not be a DDOS by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

    There is a project to serve NTP round-robin from a number of servers. You can use this pool thusly with ntpd:

    server pool.ntp.org

    If you live in Canada or the US you can even do:

    server north-america.pool.ntp.org

    Read more at:

    http://www.pool.ntp.org/

    1. Re:It need not be a DDOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Torrent links?

      Don't you guys know Bittorrent is evil and a tool that pirates use for theft?


    2. Re:It need not be a DDOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way they are going to make me trade in my iPod for one of those new ones with an intel processor in it!

  43. Hackers? Not the CIA but US STRATCOM (DoD) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CIA? That blows any sort of credibility in the report. The CIA doesnt run "hakcers", the Department of Defense does, HQ'd on an Airforce base. It was publicised back in April in this article

  44. That's nice except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mantle IS NOWHERE NEAR the center of the earth. More /. titling sensationalism. Still, drilling even 6 miles down is quite a feat

  45. yes but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it run linux?

    1. Re:yes but by maelstrom · · Score: 1

      Your mom runs linux.

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
  46. The most accurate measurement of by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    something that doesn't exist.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:The most accurate measurement of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use CrystalCPUID covers HP zv5000/zv6000 and Compaq R3000/R4000 notebooks.

  47. Wait... by koko775 · · Score: 1

    I thought Intel wasn't around fifty years ago...

  48. No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is serious. Somebody should stop them. Otherwise, they will pop the planet like a balloon, causing the insides to gush out into space, and the Earth's crust to fragment and fly off in all directions. Those parts of the crust left intact will shrink to a small fraction of their former size (just like a ballon's skin), once the air is let out of the Earth. On the plus side, traveling from point A to point B will take much less time, once the crust has shrunk, but point A and point B will themselves be much smaller. Houses in the suburbs will start to look like houses in the city, i.e., scrunched up against each other with small to non-existent back yards. No back yards! Where will yuppies hold their barbeques? My god, my god! We have to stop them before they pop the planet!

    1. Re:No no no by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

      The parent post is off-topic, and is a verbatum copy of this post, which is on-topic in this thread.
      It was obviously posted by some sort of troll-bot.
      Please moderate the parent post down as off-topic, and the original post up as funny.

      No, I am not the original poster.
      Really, I'm not.

      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  49. Do we know this for certain? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

    I mean, it could be lying about its age. If you disagree, what clock can you consult for arbitration?

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Do we know this for certain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send one or to to the Smithsonian and put the rest on ebay. I bet if NASA unloaded all their old junk they could probably fund another R/C car mission to Mars.

    2. Re:Do we know this for certain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Awards are open to all companies that have been trading in the UK for at least 12 months prior to the Awards deadline.

      So they may be giving money to open source, but none of that nsaty 'orrible community maintained nonsense.

      mmm...

      I wonder if the judges will deem participants in MS' shared source initiative as eligble to enter. More to the point, will projects whose only "openness" derives from signing a Microsoft NDA be considered eligible?

      Suppose one of MS shared source projects were to win this award, in the apparent, if illusory, face of such projects as Firefox and Apache. In some circles that might seem to add much needed credibility to the "shared source". I wonder how much that would be worth to Redmond?

      Purely speculation, of course./p

  50. ...not from "consumers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You point is completely true - but the money is not reobtained from consumers, but from savings made in the repair shop. Apple (like other electronics companies) state in their warrenties they can replace defective parts with refurbs, which are obviously cheaper than new items (example - my battery replacement they gave me for my iBook was a refurb). Thus, the cost of repair is reduced, and that's where the money is recouped.

  51. This doesn't make a lot of sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are about a billion ways you can replace the battery for about $50, so I'm not sure what the big deal is here. Even Apple will do it for $99.

    Since a new iPod with similar functionality is $250-$299 (depending on how important extra storage space is to you), I'd say battery replacement is normally going to be worthwhile.

    Unless you have an iPod broken for some other reason, I think the recycling is a bum deal.

    D

  52. Re:Chinese Military & Atomic Clocks by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    China is going to become dominant in Asia no matter what, I'm afraid. That's been inevitable for a century. There's damn little the US can do to stop it.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  53. Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't this thrown off by the tsunami?

  54. Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have measured the (absolute) celcius temperature of a well-cooled system, without quoting the ambient temperature. Then, concluding that the temperature hasn't droppped much, they assume the power hasn't dropped much.

    The correct measurement is the *difference* in temperature between the CPU and the ambient air. Power dissipation is linearly proportional to this.

  55. Time Transfer by Detritus · · Score: 1

    In the old days, it was common to use "flying clocks" to synchronize atomic clocks around the world. A flying clock is just a portable version of an atomic clock, with a rechargeable battery for its power supply. Someone would take the flying clock to the place where the primary time standard was maintained, synchronize it with the primary time standard, and hop on a commercial airplane flight to the field site. When they arrived at the field site, they would synchronize the local atomic clock with the flying clock. I've seen a flying clock that was built into a medium sized suitcase. The clock usually had its own seat and airplane ticket while traveling. Today, for most applications it is simpler to install a GPS receiver that is designed for time/frequency distribution.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Time Transfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Someone would take the flying clock to the place where the primary time standard was maintained, synchronize it with the primary time standard, and hop on a commercial airplane flight to the field site. When they arrived at the field site, they would synchronize the local atomic clock with the flying clock." ... which was then off by a couple hundred femtoseconds from the original, due to the relativistic effects of said "flying clock" having been in the airplane travelling relative to the first one.

      oops.

    2. Re:Time Transfer by Detritus · · Score: 1

      It was still much better than using WWV or LORAN to set the clock. The engineers knew about relativistic effects, which were far too small to worry about for most purposes. For the timing systems that I've worked with, microsecond-level accuracy is sufficient.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:Time Transfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's some good discussion about this going on in #space at irc.freenode.org, I'd recommend it to anyone who is interested in the topic. Also we've been talking about software issues affecting the rover (if we get to sol 1000, just about every piece of ground software will be inoperable). It's a cool place, check it out.

      Cheers,
      Justin Wick

      P.S. First accepted story! w00t!

    4. Re:Time Transfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was also "one flown shuttle main landing tire" in there, so that had to have been placed there after STS-1 in 1981

  56. I for one..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already welcomed our Atomicly Synchronized Overlords 50 years ago.

  57. First time Atomic Clock had a birthday party? by xmas2003 · · Score: 1

    According to the article, it doesn't appear there were any previous celebrations ... and in the BBC piece it doesn't say if the clock got to do anything for turning 50. I climbed a mountain on my 40th birthday - someone ought to throw a party for the poor old clock! ;-)

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    1. Re:First time Atomic Clock had a birthday party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a good idea - it wasn't invented in America!

  58. Re:Chinese Military & Atomic Clocks by nomadic · · Score: 1

    Invasion, partition, and occupation would probably do it. No, not a good idea, just saying it's not really inevitable.

  59. Wow... the 1960's.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Articles like this make me look forward to the 1960's..

    They were really advanced.. and we're lame - we just have Internets.

  60. Forgotten in a room for 30 years?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy smokes, they can build spaceships, land men on the moon, but they can't take an inventory? What else do they have laying around?

  61. Re:Chinese Military & Atomic Clocks by PakProtector · · Score: 1

    You've got to be plain stupid to think the United States could ever take China out by itself, or even with the help of nothing short of the rest of the world.

    China's population is several times the population of the United States, and if I recall correctly, its standing army is larger than the population of the United States. It doesn't matter if the US 'has the best weapons in the world for the best soldiers in the world,' as one man with an M16 can easily be disabled when there are 100 expendable persons with clubs and sword and whatnot aiming to kill him.

    The only way the United States could destroy China (as there is no hope for occupation) would be to nuke it, and China would nuke us right back, and no one would win.

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

  62. to be precise by Muhammar · · Score: 1

    50.00000000000000000000014 years (with uncertanity +/-2 in the last decimal place)

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  63. Idle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My system is never idle. It runs seti@home and/or folding@home 24/7 in the background. So I don't think the power saving features will work for me if they depend on the processor being idle. I bought a Dell 500SC for home. It has been rock solid, but the fan is very noisy, and the DMA on the secondary IDE is busted (chipset bug). When I upgrade, I don't care about bleeding edge performance, I want it to be quiet. Wouldn't you know, after I bought the 500SC, Dell came out with the 400SC, which I've installed at several customers. That thing is quiet as a mouse. Sigh. I thought about switching and telling them, "See, 500 is better 400!"

  64. someone was building a private collection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Holy smokes, they can build spaceships, land men on the moon, but they can't take an inventory?

    No, most likely they did. From the article:

    Other historical treasures found in the room include old film canisters, one flown shuttle main landing tire, electrical equipment, and various miscellaneous boxes.

    Huh. Historical treasures, that just happened to be in a room which nobody said they had a key to. Huh.

    Records show that official ownership of this suit was transferred by NASA to the Smithsonian Institution in 1983. The suit itself has now been returned to the Smithsonian.

    Anyone else starting to realize that the stuff (which spans decades, completely different programs, and sections of NASA) didn't just get up and walk (either from the Smithsonian, or more likely, from other areas at NASA, never getting to the Museum) to a locked closet nobody said they had keys for?

    Sounds to me like someone at NASA was building up their own private collection, and used a room they thought they had the only key to, not realizing there was a master key system in use./p

  65. Bragging rights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ExXXtreem underclocker bragging rights post...
    I've got my system cranked to 200 millhertz!*
    Beat that ya loozers!


    * Footnote: No system stability problems detected yet.
    I'll post a confirmation follow-up when the standard stability test suit finishes running.

    -
  66. Re:Chinese Military & Atomic Clocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point is...

    Suspense = more clickthroughs = more ad views = more revenue.

  67. Vague Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article is frustratingly vague. It sounds to me like the robot doesn't replicate itself but rather that Dr. Adrian Bowyer has created some type of system for replicating robot chasis. The picture clearly shows a plastic 'bot with attached motors, wiring, batteries, etc. From the information that the article gives, it seems like a human is still needed for the final construction. I wouldn't consider this self replicating because it is not autonomous.

  68. Golf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the same rover that scored an interplanetary hole-in-one, has broken free of an interplanetary sand trap.
    Good thing all the water hazards are frozen then, isn't it.
  69. Re:Chinese Military & Atomic Clocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This asshole (GP) posts similar crap near the top of every single article.
    Please don't feed the trolls.

  70. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One part of the article that I think many slashdot readers will find interesting is near the bottom:
    New here, aren't you?

  71. Damn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I probably should have posted that as an AC.

  72. Awwww right... but wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Now that the "m" series has been discontinued for quite a long time, they decided to replace defective units (well, there was indeed a class action but lets ignore this for now).

    So the question is: when is Palm going to fix/replace my Zire? It has two well-known problems:

    1. Really irritating, high-pitched, brain drilling, directional noise coming off the screen This issue has been around the Palm forums for quite a long time now, but Palm continues to dismiss it as "normal". Maybe they do not have ears, but the noise - non-audible when fresh new - grows over time, and is very, very annoying.
    2. Weird, fast, sudden and utterly complete and irreversible battery drainage if you use the Zire security features Palm says nothing more than "yeah, that's the way that is" and goes on recommending that the user either neve use the feature or (worse) use a third-party application to get security timed locking to work properly. They had a now legendary KB article on this subject, that stated exactly what I said, but the said article has vanished mysteriously. That article number is just no more.

    <angry-rant>
    Palm should have a better customer support but I suspect that the Harvard-CEO-type-of-mentality must dictate that its better to wait until users get organized and push a class action than just releasing a fix for software problems (point #2), because the latter would hurt the company's image (as if the class action wasn't bad enough).
    <\angry-rant>/p

  73. Re:Chinese Military & Atomic Clocks by Azzhole · · Score: 1

    But God talks directly to Dubya.... and Osama and Kim Jong and.... Anrok Nobermiz an...

  74. History of Atomic Clocks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you noticed the difference in the BBC and NIST history pages?

    According to NIST the idea of Atomic Clocks was proposed in 1945 by Isidor Rabi at Columbia University, and 'announced' in 1949 at NIST.

    According to the BBC the idea of Atomic Clocks was proposed by Lord Kelvin in 1879, and built at the NPL in 1955 by Louis Essen.

    I wonder whether there is any more importance to the 1949 and 1952 dates in the NIST history, beyond the fact that they are before 1955?

  75. IANAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    IANAL.. does anyone know how this applies to those of us who've had a Palm crap out because of this problem, outside of the US?

    I'm in Canada, and would love to have my buggered m105 replaced.


  76. North Korea vs. South Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Night vs. Day.

    South Korea is the most "connected" nation in the world, with some 80% of households having broadband, and the average broadband connection being 4 MBits/s.

    North Korea, well, can hardly feed themselves.

    Take a look at North Korea vs South Korea in this NASA "Earth at night" image

  77. T2 @Live is a nice alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since aternatives keep up innovation, there is also a KDE 3.4 and such shiny new LiveCD http://www.t2-project.org/live/).

    It even comes with D-BUS / HAL integration for auto mounting and equally perfect hardware detection.

    As usual with the System Development Environment (SDE) T2, you can automatically rebuild it, optimized for your CPU - or even other architectures.

  78. Viking experiment problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the 1976 Viking experiments detected possible signs of life, one of the suspects was bacteria from Earth. Since it was believed that life wouldn't surive the trip to Mars, the validity of this hypothesis compared to the idea that the bacteria is Martian (or the idea that it was a false positive due to nonliving sources) has been the debate of scientists for a while. We'll have to wait until someone recovers the Viking probes to know the true source of that possible signature.

  79. go for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Totally off-topic, but I just got my first DVD burner, and I'm loving it. You should check out how cheap they've gotten -- I was surprised.

    http://www.newegg.com/ProductSort/Category.asp?Cat egory=10

    The burn-any-format drives are less than $50, and media is $35/100. That's definitely getting down in the why-the-hell-not range, for me ...

  80. Distorted Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In North America at least, the trend has been going largely in the opposite direction. We are seeing REforestation rather than DEforestation. This is in despite of an increasing population.

    It can be a little tough to find good data given all the bullshit flying around but here's a map that shows the amount of forest land in the US from 1620 onwards:

    http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/gg96rpt/chap7.htm l

    A move to more densley packed cities is also a contributing factor to reforestation.

    Article such as the one Zonk cited are a favorite of the hard left environmental movement. These 'studies' cherry pick data to paint an alarmist picture. The media usually swallow these article whole with little crtical thought. In the end, these distorted pictures don't do anything to help real environmental progress.


  81. North Korea vs. South Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Night vs. Day.

    South Korea is the most "connected" nation in the world, with some 80% of households having broadband, and the average broadband connection being 4 MBits/s.

    North Korea, well, can hardly feed themselves.

    Take a look at North Korea vs South Korea in this NASA "Earth at night" image

  82. Check out replies to parent - wtf slashdot ? by Animaether · · Score: 1

    Parent post (Re:Caesium) is about "Atomic Clock Turns 50"

    Three replies as I type this:

    1. : "since knoppix uses a very cleverly hacked filesystem layout" ???

    2. : " was curious to find that 5th picture, talking about using insects to control a green swirl". I think that belongs with Changing Planet Revealed In Atlas

    3. "I'm sorry, but what qualification does CNET have to bestow open source software awards". CNET to Award Open Source Initiatives, anyone ?

    Looks like Slashdot's a bit borked :>

  83. atomic clocks have no display by astroteacher · · Score: 1

    The ironic thing about an atomic clock is that you have to have a computer to read the time. I saw one once at Kitt Peak National Observatory, and it was just like a server in a room without a terminal. No display, not even a digital display, to tell the time. They didn't even have an analog clock on the wall.

  84. BBC Inflates UK Science (surprise!) & A Good L by insignificant1 · · Score: 1

    From the article: "The first atomic clock ... was born at the UK's National Physical Laboratory."

    Well, the first -cesium- atomic clock was made at NPL, UK, which was certainly a major advance. But the FIRST ATOMIC CLOCK was built at the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) which is now known as NIST, in the US. So I disagree with the BBC's presentation of the situation.

    Check out http://physics.nist.gov/GenInt/Time/ for more info and history than what was linked in the original post on this topic.

  85. Re:Chinese Military & Atomic Clocks by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Been tried before. It failed, Now China has nuclear capabilities, and while she might not be able to take out anything in the US, well I'm sure Japan would appreciate a few more mushroom clouds.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  86. Re:Chinese Military & Atomic Clocks by nomadic · · Score: 1

    You're kind of ignorant here. Technology is a lot more important than sheer numbers, and who the hell cares if someone has a club if you're in a bomber 50,000 feet above them? Just look at the past, China has always had a population advantage and that didn't keep Japan from just rolling over Manchuria, or the various Western powers from grabbing whatever cities they felt like.

  87. UTC, TUC and GPS by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 2, Informative
    The standard day-to-day time system is UTC (rather mysteriously standing for Coordinated Universal Time) and it is based on the rotation of the earth. This is decided by the BIPM. As the length of a day is not precisely divisible by a second, leap seconds occasioanlly have to be added.

    The Big International Scientific Conference that got together to define a new time scale to replace GMT had no difficulty coming up with the name "Coordinated Universal Time", but deadlocked when it came time to decide between the English acronym (CUT) or the French one (TUC). So they decided to use the symbol UTC, which doesn't stand for anything.

    Leap seconds are used to keep UTC in sync with the Earth's rotation. Since the Earth's rotation is steadily slowing down, UTC would drift away from any sensible time if it wasn't adjusted every now and then. So they add the occasional extra second to keep them in sync.

    GPS time runs at the same rate as UTC, but has no leap seconds, and is currently 13 seconds different. People who navigate by the stars use UT1. Then there is the Terrestrial Dynamical Time that astronomers use, which is another matter entirely.

    ...laura

  88. AllansTIME.com by sterlingda · · Score: 1

    My dad, David W. Allan, worked with the Atomic clock at NIST until 1992 when he retired. The "Allan Variance" is an algorithm at the heart of international time-keeping.

    He has continued his research on a tangent subject of a new unified field theory. He is in process of implementing some of his theories by way of ultra-precision positioning. You might find his theory worth review. AllansTIME.com

    He also has passion in the subject of health. His solar home is likewise a hallmark of his forward thinking. http://allanstime.com/SolarHome/

    --
    Tomorrow's news yesterday -- the bleeding, visionary edge.