Slashdot Mirror


Using an Old Space-Suit as a Satellite

Andrew-Unit writes "The ARRL has an interesting article about an amateur satellite project where some amateur radio electronics will be crammed into an old spacesuit and chucked out of the window of the International Space Station."

183 comments

  1. Why do we need a spacesuit?? by jigyasubalak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's only radio machinery.

    btw, is this FP?

    --
    The best planning can be done after the project completes.
    1. Re:Why do we need a spacesuit?? by AtlanticGiraffe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps to keep the whole thing together and provide minimal protection, in case it bumps into another amateur radio space-suit?

      "The preamp has landed on the moon. End of transmission."

    2. Re:Why do we need a spacesuit?? by RevengeOfPoopJuggler · · Score: 3, Informative

      Probably for radiation protection.

    3. Re:Why do we need a spacesuit?? by IAmTheDave · · Score: 3, Funny

      To keep it warm at night.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    4. Re:Why do we need a spacesuit?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      What does a spacesuit provide?

      Shade, cooling, gas pressure retention, and various electrical services like a radio. Some of these sound useful to an electrical device (mainly the cooling - probably the biggest problem for electrical equipment thrown into space is cooling, because it's hard to do convective cooling without gas!).

      I don't think a spacesuit provides much defence against radiation, though there will be some. It will give somewhat more protection against micrometeorites and orbiting flecks of paint.

      But as far as I can see, it will only provide this protection for hours - perhaps a day or so at most. The simplest purpose-built container will do a better job.

    5. Re:Why do we need a spacesuit?? by Ixitar · · Score: 1

      Safe satelliting? Always use protection. You don't know what is out there.

    6. Re:Why do we need a spacesuit?? by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      Too keep the little man that makes the magic work alive. DUH!

    7. Re:Why do we need a spacesuit?? by doomsayerxero · · Score: 1

      http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/10/19/1/?nc= 1
      Basically they are trying to dump trash out the window and thought they could reuse the suit.

      --
      Don't screw up, don't throw up.
    8. Re:Why do we need a spacesuit?? by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      Movies thought me that space is cold. won't the radio equipment will cool better if you leave the spacesuit behind? :)

      Joke aside it is quite hard to explain people that space isn't cold and you would feel very hot if you were in orbit, especially if your only cooling method is inefficient radiation .

    9. Re:Why do we need a spacesuit?? by utnow · · Score: 0

      The spacesuit is to hold the hundreds of pictures and the harddrive containing artwork done by little kids who are happy about having their works out in space... where they will be incinerated several weeks later and be seen by noone.

      Why in gods name was a disk with the artwork placed in this thing?

    10. Re:Why do we need a spacesuit?? by karrot · · Score: 1

      Good way to get rid of a dead body.

    11. Re:Why do we need a spacesuit?? by koko775 · · Score: 1

      except for the fact that it's really, really, really, really expensive to manufacture on earth and bring up as opposed to just launching it from the space station.

    12. Re:Why do we need a spacesuit?? by MisterBates · · Score: 1

      With gas pressure retention being to important, it must really suck to rip a fart in one of those things.

  2. ... er by mister_llah · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... and so the 1st Inglewood satellite is launched...

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    1. Re:... er by drgonzo59 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Inglewood - always up to no good! /sorry, had to be said, probably will get modded down by someone who is not a slashdot brotha'

    2. Re:... er by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gung Ho, Mack One Oh! FOE LIFE!!!1

    3. Re:... er by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Inglewood - always up to no good!

      Given the role of the Jet Propulsion Lab in spaceflight, "Pasadena, where you at?" might be more apropos.

    4. Re:... er by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      Fo shnizzle yo JPL, wussup!

  3. Space Junk by laursen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do we really need more space junk orbiting Earth?

    1. Re:Space Junk by heli0 · · Score: 3, Informative
      FTA:
      Once deployed, SuitSat is expected to orbit the planet for several weeks before burning up when it enters Earth's atmosphere.
      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    2. Re:Space Junk by stuckinarut · · Score: 1

      Once deployed, SuitSat is expected to orbit the planet for several weeks before burning up when it enters Earth's atmosphere.

    3. Re:Space Junk by mister_llah · · Score: 2, Funny

      In a word? Yes.

      How else are we going to have a cool cinematic view of the earth for post apocolyptic movies where the human race was almost entirely wiped out by an alien race... come on now!

      --
      MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
      http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    4. Re:Space Junk by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh...polluting the atmosphere. That's MUCH better. What kinds of toxic substances make up a space suit and radio gear?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:Space Junk by ColaMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thousands of tons of crap enters the atmosphere every day. You could probably make a suit out of ,say, plutonium and still have negligible effect considering:

      One spacesuit+electronics - 50kg, tops.
      Atmosphere - 5,000,000,000,000,000,000kg (by most estimates).

      Even guesstimating that it might incinerate and cover an area 1/8th the size of the globe during re-entry, that's still pretty much SFA. Even with plutonium being the nasty thing that it is.

      Of course, the associated problems of dealing with 50kg of plutonium in one place at the same time is left as an exercise for the reader.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    6. Re:Space Junk by Iron+Sun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, please. Get a sense of proportion.

      Hey, I peed in the ocean the last time I went swimming. Call the EPA!

    7. Re:Space Junk by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      You could probably make a suit out of, say, plutonium and still have negligible effect

      Haven't you learned anything from watching the news: a single atom of plutonium is capable of killing millions of people! If two happen to get close enough together, then there will be a nucular explosion large enough to split the planet in half! Only the French have any possible chance of saving us!

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    8. Re:Space Junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Godammit! That was you?!

      I was wondering why the water tasted "salty"

    9. Re:Space Junk by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Daughter: We are not we colonizing space yet?

      Dad: NASA has had to overcome many problems with space travel, a couple of them are related to space.

      Daughter: Why is that space suit up there?

      Dad: Well, it was the only they could fly in space, for any length of time; Without help.

    10. Re:Space Junk by Detritus · · Score: 1
      Of course, the associated problems of dealing with 50kg of plutonium in one place at the same time is left as an exercise for the reader.

      That problem will "solve itself" in about one microsecond.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    11. Re:Space Junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have this visual of a group of school kids on a field trip unexpectedly witnessing the burning "body" falling from the sky and bursting to flaming bits when it impacts nearby. Can you say "scarred for life"?

    12. Re:Space Junk by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      Oh, for goodness sake, if you're going to worry about THAT, then you might want to take a look at the millions of wobbly creatures in their SUVs processessing far too much food into waste ;)

      --
      Me (Blog)
    13. Re:Space Junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear site administrator, I just received the following message: "Slashdot requires you to wait 2 minutes between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment. It's been 4 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment Chances are, you're behind a firewall or proxy, or clicked the Back button to accidentally reuse a form. Please try again. If the problem persists, and all other options have been tried, contact the site administrator." WTF? Sincerely, MisterBates

  4. Why a spacesuit? by mboverload · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What does a spacesuit have that a box of quarter inch steel plate doesn't? I bet the suit weighs alot more and I KNOW the electronics dont need a human atmosphere.

    1. Re:Why a spacesuit? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The spacesuit is already onboard the ISS and has been declared as surplus.

      quarter inch steel plate has the disadvantage of sitting on Earth, and would take up valuable space on a supply rocket.
      They might as well use the suit for something.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Why a spacesuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Didn't the oxygen supply fail on the ISS? They might want to keep those "surplus" suits around.

    3. Re:Why a spacesuit? by Eminence · · Score: 4, Funny
      The spacesuit is already onboard the ISS and has been declared as surplus.

      Yeah, so instead of coming up with an innovative way of delivering mass to orbit we achieve that through accounting. It's declared as surplus, written off, and then it appears it got there *for free* - Ta-Da!

    4. Re:Why a spacesuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I KNOW "ALOT" IS NOT A WORD. You wouldn't write ALITTLE, would you?

    5. Re:Why a spacesuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The space suit was required at one point, so they paid to send it up. The requirement is complete, so they got what they paid for. Now, anything that they can do with it after that is "gravy*".

      It's not like they are going "Gee, if we send things to space and then call them surplus, they are free".

      *SpaceGravy on the ISS just *tastes* like an old space suit. It's not really made from one. We swear.

    6. Re:Why a spacesuit? by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      A box of steel would act as a Faraday cage, thus greatly reducing the efficacy of the radio devices inside.

  5. spacesuit + ducttape = russia joke by Saeger · · Score: 1

    In soviet russia... wait, are these Russian kids? That would explain everything. (nope, didn't RTFA, and neither did you.)

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  6. great by Emblem7 · · Score: 1, Funny

    now they can broadcast the War of the Worlds to the whole globe simultaneously and scare the sh*t out of everyone like they did in the 1930s!
    it really would be a transmission from outer space!

  7. Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that an antenna in your pocket...?

    1. Re:Obvious question by matt+me · · Score: 5, Funny

      no, i'm just deployed to see you.

  8. Wrong words by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In space, one doesn't 'chuck' - one 'deploys' ie:

    Space: "Then we will deploy the space suit..."

    Earth: "Vern chucked his fast food container out the window of his car"


    Other permutations do not work ie:

    Officer: "What do you think you are doing?"

    Vern: "Hey officer, just deploying my garbage..."

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:Wrong words by mister_llah · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good point... I would also think chucking something out of a space station window is a terribly dumb idea, explosive decompression and all.

      The scenario would go something like this...

      Space Jim: "Hey its hot in here open a window!"
      Space Rob: "OH GOD MY LUNGS ARE INVERTING!"

      --
      MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
      http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    2. Re:Wrong words by salvorHardin · · Score: 2, Funny
      Time to re-work that old Irish Submarine joke.

      How do you destroy a Russian space station?
      Knock on the window.

    3. Re:Wrong words by mister_llah · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I can see it now!

      YURI! DO NOT KNOCK ON ACK-NO! YOU ARE VERY IDIOT! AHH!

      (crack)

      (fwloomp sound of the entire contents of Mir being pushed out into space in a matter of a second)

      --
      MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
      http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    4. Re:Wrong words by eaolson · · Score: 1
      I would also think chucking something out of a space station window is a terribly dumb idea, explosive decompression and all.

      Frankly, I think building a space station with windows that can be opened is a pretty dumb idea to begin with.

      (And, yes, I know it will actually be deployed on a spacewalk.)

    5. Re:Wrong words by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      LOL!

      Mind you, the English language can be a bit weird a t times - after all, if 'deploy' is to 'put out', then surely 'ploy' is to 'bring in' - likewise with 'destroy' (take apart) and 'stroy' (out together?) - so...

      "The old spacesuit was ployed some time ago on the station, but is now surplus to requirements and so will be deployed in space where it will eventually be destroyed reentering the Earth's atmosphere. This is no major loss as the suit was originally stroyed as a spare."

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    6. Re:Wrong words by mattdm · · Score: 1
      Blame the french:


      Main Entry: deploy
      Pronunciation: di-'ploi
      Function: verb
      Etymology: French déployer, literally, to unfold, from Old French desploier, from des- dis- + ploier, plier to fold -- more at PLY


      Main Entry: destroy
      Pronunciation: di-'stroi, dE-
      Function: verb
      Etymology: Middle English, from Old French destruire, from (assumed) Vulgar Latin destrugere, alteration of Latin destruere, from de- + struere to build -- more at STRUCTURE
    7. Re:Wrong words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:Wrong words by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

      Yes, and problems are "unforseen negative enhancements" I got that one from my brother, who would sometimes work console at MSFC while on live NASA cable feed. They would use phrases that wouldn't scream out "problem!" just so it wouldn't attract attention. Gotta love it, "negative enhancement" those rocket scientists

    9. Re:Wrong words by serutan · · Score: 1

      In space, no one can hear you chuck.

    10. Re:Wrong words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn you, now you made it all come back. Just when I had recovered from a traumatic phonecall that happened couple of years ago. A guy from the Paris office kept calling and sending e-mail with huge photos he took from the server console. He was worried to death, because the backup software displayed word 'default' all over the screen.

  9. Amateur radio is pretty interesting. by caluml · · Score: 5, Informative

    I find it amazing (and heartening) that in this world of money, and greed, that some people will build satellites, and get them launched into space, purely so Amateur Radio hams can bounce off them and talk all around the world. I've never done it myself, but I've watched someone going in on 2 metres, and hearing their output on 10. You only get a few minutes before the satellite disappears below the horizon again, but it's still cool.
    You could also listen to Mir on 143.625.

    1. Re:Amateur radio is pretty interesting. by caluml · · Score: 1

      Narrow-band FM. I don't think you'll be hearing it now though :)

    2. Re:Amateur radio is pretty interesting. by Secrity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is cool for hams to get satellites into earth orbit. Amateur Radio is perhaps one of the first examples Open Source or community development. From the very start; amateurs developed radio circuits, techniques, and standards that were openly published for anybody to use. Some of the right people understand the usefulness of Amateur Radio and the need for such projects.

      In most cases the people building ham satellites are hams, with some corporate support. The really cool part is that the various national space agencies allow / takes part in the deployment of the ham satellites.

    3. Re:Amateur radio is pretty interesting. by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      A co-worker gave me a nice cross-yagi for 2m. When I have some time free on my hand I'll finish it with a 70cm one as well and will be ready for satellite hunting. I already have an FT-847 which was marketed as "Earth Station" and has quite usefull stuff for satellite comms.

      OTOH, I haven't touched the rig for a couple of months. Quite stupid really, at least the HF comms should be fine at this time of the year.

    4. Re:Amateur radio is pretty interesting. by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Well, it will be leaving a massive ionization trail so someone can do some "meteor" scatter off it! :)

    5. Re:Amateur radio is pretty interesting. by leighklotz · · Score: 1

      >You only get a few minutes before the satellite disappears below the horizon again, but it's still cool.
      You can also use a store-and-forward system (like SMTP) to send messages to a Digipeater on the ISS or a ham satellite and have them picked up later by someone halfway around the world, without worrying about the view horizon. A friend of mine did this with a two-meter handitalkie and an antenna stuck on an ironing board.

    6. Re:Amateur radio is pretty interesting. by Juggle · · Score: 1

      The 70cm downlink on AO-51 "Echo" is amazingly easy to recieve. I just picked up a used dual bander this weekend (my old UHF radios all stopped at 440 so they couldn't recieve the 435.300 downlink from AO-51) and made my first couple of sattelite contacts.

      All I was using was a $170 used radio, a $12 whip on my truck for the 2m uplink (running 10 watts) and a mini yagi I built out of some left over house wire and a scrap of PCV crimped to some spare coax following this guys plans 70cm cheapie antenna

      Total investment was less than $200 and I was able to copy the sat very well - here's a recording of one of last nights passes 5:50 6-13-2005 UTC recorded from Yuma AZ

      But after today AO-51 will be going into S band downlink so unless you're setup for recieving 2.4Ghz FM you won't be able to hear anything until after field day on the 26th.

      The LEO FM sats are amazingly easy to recieve. Before I got this radio I was listening to AO-51 with just my Alinco DJ-C5t and it's stock antenna. Amazingly even that was able to hear most of the pass if I help the radio just right.

      --
      --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
    7. Re:Amateur radio is pretty interesting. by Juggle · · Score: 1

      Awww heck, messed up my link. So much for preview.

      Here's the correct link for the recording of that pass:

      AO-51 Echo recording

      --
      --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
    8. Re:Amateur radio is pretty interesting. by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      cheers, I should do something about my radios and antennas and get interested in the hobby again.

  10. Great!! by William+Robinson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aliens will be deterred thinking that they are cops orbitting around earth!!!

    1. Re:Great!! by serutan · · Score: 1

      Maybe not aliens, but I can see some future space salvage operators... Hey what's that over there? It's not on the active sat list, let's grab ... HOLY CRAP! IT'S A GUY!!!

    2. Re:Great!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aliens will be deterred thinking that they are cops orbitting around earth!!!

      Assuming, of course, that aliens are as dumb as crows. However, this looks more like the tin man than the scarecrow, anyway....

  11. They don't need a space suit,, do they ? by Arthur+B. · · Score: 0

    Can you say: "cosmic rays" ?

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
  12. Amateur radio?? by madaxe42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It seems the only 'amateur radio' equipment to be included is a single transmitter - everything else is going to be a bunch of CDs with school artwork on them - it's not clear whether the contents of the CDs are to be transmitted, or just, rather pointlessly, IMHO, held in orbit....

    1. Re:Amateur radio?? by Adrilla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I was one of those students, whether it's being transmitted or not, I'd think it's much more awesome that my art is orbiting space rather than just hanging on the class wall or in the hallways or even on the fridge (which they may also be). Can you say that your schoolwork got to hitch a ride on a spaceship then got to float in orbit in a spacesuit for a while? It's not necessarily important, but for a few kids, on a scale from 1 to Cool Shit: I'd say it ranks, Cool Shit.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    2. Re:Amateur radio?? by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      PS: It could also spark some young interest in the space program, which isn't as popular as it once was with schoolkids


      (sorry for responding to my own post)

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    3. Re:Amateur radio?? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      For a while... the orbit won't last forever. All this space station and shuttle crap is barely on the edge of the atmosphere... gravity out there is only about 10% less strong than it is here, if that gives you an idea how close they are.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Amateur radio?? by Secrity · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      "Once deployed, SuitSat is expected to orbit the planet for several weeks before burning up when it enters Earth's atmosphere."

      From Wikipedia: ... "In the United States, persons who travel above an altitude of 50.0 miles (80.5 km) are designated as astronauts. ... The Karman line, at 100 km (62 mi), is also frequently used as the boundary between atmosphere and space."

      At an altitude of about 350 km, the ISS is in a stable orbit (barely) and is a bit further out than "the edge of the atmosphere" (which does not exist but is frequently considered to be 100 km).

    5. Re:Amateur radio?? by idonthack · · Score: 1

      Except they can't say Cool Shit because they'd get detention.

      They can probably say Spiffy, though. They should say Spiffy.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    6. Re:Amateur radio?? by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      Cool? Hardly. Pathetic is more like it. In the words of Ronald Coleman in "Champagne for Caesar," "If it is noteworthy and rewarding to know that 2 and 2 make 4 to the accompaniment of deafening applause and prizes, then 2 and 2 making 4 will become the top level of learning." If using a multi-billion dollar space program as an incinerator for your classwork is impressive, then you should get your money back on your education...

    7. Re:Amateur radio?? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      it's not clear whether the contents of the CDs are to be transmitted, or just, rather pointlessly, IMHO, held in orbit...

      Call the RIAA!!!

    8. Re:Amateur radio?? by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      The impressive part would not be the incineration, but the orbit. They get to do something few, if any kids have gotten to do. Which is have their classwork put into space and possibly transmitted. Which does a minimum of two things:
      1. Get them interested in some normally mundane schoolwork
      2. Get them interested in the space program.

      The cost is minimal for both the school and the space program, as it is just the cost of scanning some pics, burning a few cd's and mailing them to space authority, where they will have piggybacked on an already planned mission and thrown out with the suit that has been deemed surplus and is going to be jettisoned anyway. They aren't spending billions of dollars to send artwork into space, the astronauts are just taking it with them and putting them into orbit along with the radio equipment. There's not a lot of trouble accompanied with this nice action. Jeez, lighten up a bit and remember they're doing it for the kids.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
  13. ok the spacesuit is feasible by nietsch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But throwing it out of thewindow of the ISS? come on, this must be a joke. why would you want to do that? It costs (hundreds of) thousands of dollars to get a few kilo's in that orbit. If you are able to spend such an amount of money, surely you can make/buy something better than that? If this is real, then maybe the russians don't have such a crisis with paying for their progress supply ships after all. I propose reducing ESA's budget by the estimated worth of this frivolous spacesuit in orbit.

    On the other hand, if the spacesuit is already up there and needs to replaced anyhow, then I'd say go for it. It certenly tickles the imagination as the following discussions will prove..

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    1. Re:ok the spacesuit is feasible by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Space(no pun intended) on the station is at a premium.

      The suits are not being used and have been declared as surplus, might as well let the school kids get involved in something than just wasting an opportunity :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:ok the spacesuit is feasible by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      Even the headline has 'old' in it...... try a little bit harder with this reading thing.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    3. Re:ok the spacesuit is feasible by Ed+Thomson · · Score: 3, Funny

      This will be cool for amateur astronomers to try to find the dead guy floating in space using a telescope.

    4. Re:ok the spacesuit is feasible by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      way ahead of you - see one of my other posts on this topic ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:ok the spacesuit is feasible by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA. It's a OLD Orlon spacesuit. One they are not using. It's cheaper for them to do that and let it burn up in the atmosphere then it will be for them to send it back on a Soyuz or Shuttle.

      --

      Gorkman

    6. Re:ok the spacesuit is feasible by nietsch · · Score: 1

      Ok i was still reading the article while posting, but shouldn't you be sure to word it correctly: An old spacesuit is in most cases not a surplus spacesuit in the ISS. Hell there is a whole industry in russia monetizing russian space artifacts.

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    7. Re:ok the spacesuit is feasible by benbob · · Score: 1

      I propose reducing ESA's budget by the estimated worth of this frivolous spacesuit in orbit.

      Really?! The ESA? Why!??

      --
      Random Signature #3
      Generated by SlashdotRndSig via GreaseMonkey
      --
      Random Signature #2
      Generated by SlashdotRndSig via GreaseMonkey

    8. Re:ok the spacesuit is feasible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah - but imagine how much it would fetch on ebay?

    9. Re:ok the spacesuit is feasible by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      But throwing it out of thewindow of the ISS? come on, this must be a joke. why would you want to do that? It costs (hundreds of) thousands of dollars to get a few kilo's in that orbit. If you are able to spend such an amount of money, surely you can make/buy something better than that?

      The space station slowly falls down because of the friction with the athmosphere. For this reason it regularly has to be lifted into higher orbits with fuel expesively brought from Earth. By getting rid of items not being used they reduce the need for this fuel. It is unclear how significant this is and if it ever was a consideration - but it is clear that you gain at least something from throwing out stuff that isn't used.

      Tor

    10. Re:ok the spacesuit is feasible by nietsch · · Score: 1

      ESA~=European Space A(ssociation?)
      me=dutch=european. Or would you like me to propose to reduce NASA's budget? Can I vote for the next potus then too? please?

      ESA pays for ISS too (probably not too much), a very small part is my money. That is why I proposed that much more than that should be deducted from ESA's budget for flying frivolous spacesuits.

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  14. helmet cam will be interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Assuming it will be facing in the correct direction it should give the first point of view of a person stranded in space re-entering earth's atmosphere.

    "Here's you in space... here's you coming home..."

    1. Re:helmet cam will be interesting. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm wondering how many calls there will be when people with telescopes start seeing a body flashing past their eyes.

      "OMG somebody is stranded in space!"

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:helmet cam will be interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or they'll assume it's the Taliban or Osama Bin Laden and call the FBI and the Dept of Homeland Security...

      "OMG, terrorists in space, we're all doomed!"

    3. Re:helmet cam will be interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Never mind...consider the project shut down as of the parent post :(

    4. Re:helmet cam will be interesting. by WoBIX · · Score: 1

      Even better if some of it survives reentry.

      "Mama, look what I found in the back 40! A spaceman!"

    5. Re:helmet cam will be interesting. by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's an excuse given for a lost suit and a not-really-lost-but-called-in-sick cosmonaut.

      In space no one can hear you gasp for air.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    6. Re:helmet cam will be interesting. by Bourbonium · · Score: 1

      Not the first POV. Remember the Columbia Seven? They were the first. This will be the eighth.

    7. Re:helmet cam will be interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How soon before this is developed as a business model for unique cremations? Get blasted into orbit, released and experience cremation high in the upper atmosphere as you reenter. Become the shooting star that your loved ones will wish upon.

  15. good casing for space? by Use+Psychology · · Score: 2, Interesting


    enclosing the guts of the satellite -- i.e. the technology -- in a shell such as this seems a pretty good idea. since the space-suit isn't brittle, it should be less susceptible to shattering by micro-meteorites and space-debris.

    i guess power supply would be a problem though?

    1. Re:good casing for space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about putting somebody in the spacesuit, running a dynamo?

      "ISS radio amateur satellite, Lance Amstrong speaking..."

    2. Re:good casing for space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding is that when 'space' debris collidtes with object they dont so much shatter as vaporise

    3. Re:good casing for space? by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

      Little hamsters. On wheels. Have a few little hamsters on wheels in series with each other... could generate a fair bit of electricity.

  16. haha hams can bounce! by mister_llah · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You made a funny! ... er, oh, you were serious... *backs away slowly*

    ===

    It is rather cool, all jokes aside, indeed, that I could pay my astronaut friends (if I ever find any) to throw my Great Space Toaster out the "window" (see also: airlock) so that I can remote control my orbital mind control lasers without that 2 seconds of lag.

    Muhahah! ... uhn, you should probably ignore that.

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
  17. This can't be happening! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is going to be the most ridiculous flying object ever. Or well, almost...

    - Is it a bird?
    - Is it a plane?
    - NO!!! It's some radioamateur stuff in an old astronaut suit!

  18. alien contact foiled by bmgz · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..after traveling for thousands of years, an alien crafts effort of final contact is foiled after crashing into, what appears to be- a satellite wearing spacesuite, just beyond the earths atmosphere..

  19. The ISS has a window?! by Mwongozi · · Score: 3, Funny

    In case it gets hot, perhaps?

    1. Re:The ISS has a window?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 1 million dollar ELECTRIC window no less with tray hooks for the in space McDonalds fly thru.

    2. Re:The ISS has a window?! by piinkfloyyd · · Score: 0

      is the Window xp, me, or 98?

      --
      ...the SIGnificance of inSIGnificance is SIGnificant...
    3. Re:The ISS has a window?! by Andrew-Unit · · Score: 1

      LOL. Actually, it only costs 800,000 USD. And, it's actually quite a technology.

      The window (WORF; for Window Observational Research Facility) is 20 inches in diameter. It is made of very high quality glass suitable for use with high-resolution telescopes.

      Read a bit more here.

    4. Re:The ISS has a window?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm...no. The space station is still in orbit, therefore it cannot be a Microsoft Window.

    5. Re:The ISS has a window?! by MobKiller · · Score: 1

      The window opens so they can flee in case of fire...

    6. Re:The ISS has a window?! by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      It was added not long after the first red beans meal.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    7. Re:The ISS has a window?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you certain? It leaks, it's way over budget, and all the major new functionality was dropped to get it done on time.

  20. I've dreamed about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...subjecting suits to the harsh zero-pressure, high temperature gradient, deadly radiation environment. Always seemed like a good idea.

  21. I can see it now .. by torpor · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. future-Gryllidae-overlords-of-the-earth archeologist clique, collecting space debris for detailed analysis, find an old 'human skin vessel' floating out there, ever-watching, ever alert ..

    its enough to make you want to chitillate ones carapace, ew.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  22. There goes my "lucky" shirt! by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope my wife doesn't read this story. Otherwise the next time she goes to throw out all my "lucky" (read:Confortable) shirts she will just tell me "I am redploying them"

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:There goes my "lucky" shirt! by zienth · · Score: 1

      I hope *my* wife doesn't see this. She'll be upset that they didn't donate it to the Salvation Army.

      "They're throwing away a perfectly good space suit? They should give it to a homeless person or something!"

      Keith

  23. Inglewood? Try Compton! by SlashdotTroll · · Score: 0, Funny

    All this satellite needs is a cantenna in one hand, and a WirelessB Pistol in the other, and web-controlled to point at the most-disliked federal area...a tie between Compton (California), Bronx (New York), or in the general direction of New Jersey (a stereotype I have yet to comprehend).

    --

    I am the nightmare of nightmares.

  24. farts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they should study farts in spacesuits more.

  25. Power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so the "chuck it in a spacesuit" concept negates any possibility of attitude control, so any kind of solar power is out.

    And I'm REALLY hoping they're not planning on any kind of nuclear power option here...

    Which appears to leave batteries and the only real option for powering this thing.

    How long can this thing transmit for before running out of power? And is it really worth this much fuss?

  26. Chucked out of the window? by BinaryCodedDecimal · · Score: 1

    They had better remember to wind the window back up when they're done.

  27. ISS has a history of supporting Amateur Radio by VE3ECM · · Score: 5, Informative
    Not only have there been quite a few astro/cosmonauts that are licensed amateurs, but they maintain a functional Amateur Radio station on the ISS.

    Contacts made from/to the ISS

    Official NASA ISS Amateur Radio Page

    ARRL ISS Page

    It's incredibly easy to talk to the ISS from the earth... you don't need a particularily high-powered radio to do it. In fact, the radio on the ISS is a plain jane, Kenwood dual-band radio.

    1. Re:ISS has a history of supporting Amateur Radio by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think astronauts aren't required to have a license to broadcast, they have a special status.

      I know for a fact that they're the only ones who are exempt from the rule that says you can't play music over the air. (Studied for tech exam a year or two ago)

    2. Re:ISS has a history of supporting Amateur Radio by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      While I don't disagree with the "special status" claim, I'm pretty sure they all have licenses...

      At least, they're granted callsigns, which in return would infer that they have a license.

      5 astro/cosmonauts and their callsigns

      I wouldn't be surprised if they were granted license sans examination.

    3. Re:ISS has a history of supporting Amateur Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U.S. Astronauts have to get their amateur radio license just like everyone else.

    4. Re:ISS has a history of supporting Amateur Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really studied for your tech exam, you'd know that broadcasting is prohibited in the amateur radio service. Radio amateurs transmit, not broadcast. Broadcast is inherently one way and meant for the general public. Transmit can refer to anything.

      Also, the astronauts are not exempt from the no music rule. The only exception to the no music rule is when an amateur has received permission from NASA to retransmit ship to mission control communications and there is incidental music contained in those communications which are being retransmitted to other amateurs.

      73 de AC.

  28. I can just imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can just imagine the scenario where it all goes horribly wrong.

    "No, wait, Gennady! Thats not it, thats me-aaaaaaaaaaaaggggghhhhhhh!"

  29. Headlines after a few orbits... by matt+me · · Score: 1

    The International Space Station is leaking oxygen after being hit by what has officially been described as 'space junk' but many believe to be an object malicously planted in the path of the ISS' orbit by filthy terrorists...

    Once again, with the Space Shuttles still not running, the lives of our brave and noble astronauts will be saved by another standard Soyuz supply mission.

  30. He's heading for that small satellite. by d9000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I think I can get him before he gets there... he's almost in range."

    "That's no satellite! It's a space suit!"

    "It's too small to be a space suit."

    "I have a very bad feeling about this."

    1. Re:He's heading for that small satellite. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      It's Frank Poole.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:He's heading for that small satellite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now witness the firepower of this fully armed and operational space suit ... CQ? CQ?"

  31. heh by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    There is something morbidly funny about seeing a human silhouette floating in orbit.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    1. Re:heh by aerthling · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but re-entry is even funnier.

    2. Re:heh by d9000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think we are all still shocked by the tragic death of Frank Poole.

  32. Exactly, besides... by chillmost · · Score: 4, Funny
    Perhaps to keep the whole thing together and provide minimal protection, in case it bumps into another amateur radio space-suit?


    Exactly, besides it looks better than duct tape.

  33. windows? by taybin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why would the ISS have windows that open??

  34. Guesstimating by empaler · · Score: 1

    is not a word.

    Apart from that, yeah, a shoddy old spacesuit should do no difference - whereas it would do a difference if more people started taking the bus (or even better, the bike) instead the car to work.

    1. Re:Guesstimating by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Guesstimating is not a word."

      Hmm.. I guess my babel fish is going senile then.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Guesstimating by compro01 · · Score: 1

      regardless of if you belive Darwin, language evolves.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:Guesstimating by empaler · · Score: 1

      It's not evolution; cross-breeding a nonsensical word from two proper words is devolution.

    4. Re:Guesstimating by iibagod · · Score: 1

      What I learned in Second Grade.

      Damned Devolutionists.

    5. Re:Guesstimating by empaler · · Score: 1

      So... if high+light=good, then guess+estimate-ess=good?
      Jeez.

      No wonder the US stockpiles any sort of weapon it can get... It's the only way it can win an argument.

    6. Re:Guesstimating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "regardless of if you belive Darwin, language evolves."

      If you believe that, then you should have written "Irregardless".

  35. Chuck out the spare spacesuit!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..are you crazy? Now which spacesuit will Bruce Willis use?

  36. Best. Idea. Ever. by GuyZero · · Score: 2

    I plan on doing the same thing with some old gym shorts and my car next week.

  37. It almost sounds logical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider for yourself. Have spacesuit. Therefore, will travel...

    Seriously, the suit has exhausted its useful life. It could be sent to Earth - but it means waiting for Shuttle ('twas a long wait already... hope they'll fly soon anyway). It's possible - technically - to return it by Soyuz, but impossible logistics-wise - Soyuz can carry about 50 kilogram from station to Earth, and there are way more important things to catch the next Soyuz ride downward. Like results of experiments, for instance.

    Spacesuit can be just thrown out-the-window. In fact, that was initially proposed. Yes, it's a space junk - but only for relatively short period; atmosphere will "land" it in a matter of weeks.

    So, why not squeeze some more usefulness out of the equipment? The suit can carry a transceiver, for sure. The suit is already on board - and the air inside it will wark as thermoinsulator for the electronics for some time (there is some reason, after all, why almost all Soviet and Russian satellites up until recently were germetically sealed and carried air to orbit).

  38. Imagine that drifting up to the window... by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...of the space shuttle. AAAAAAAAGGHHHHHH!!!! AAAAAAAAGGHHHHHH!!!! Oh, wait, it's just SuitSat.

    Be a great joke to play on the new guys. The first ghost story in space. And they say old Bob still orbits around these parts, forever relaying ham radio signals.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Imagine that drifting up to the window... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wonder how long its orbit will last? Sightings of it might keep the conspiracy and tin-foil guys happy for decades.


      As for drifting up to the window, nothing beats JS Bear splating against a Star Fury cockpit in B5.

    2. Re:Imagine that drifting up to the window... by d0rp · · Score: 1

      Either that or they'll have forgotten about this in a few years and then freak out because they need to rescue the guy floating out there.....

    3. Re:Imagine that drifting up to the window... by beej · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...of the space shuttle. Yeah--if they don't put a Ronald Reagan mask inside the helmet of that suit, I'm going to be incredibly disappointed. What a lost opportunity!

  39. Similar things have been done before by ZPO · · Score: 1

    IIRC, the soviets hand launched a few satellites known as "Iskra" from the Salyut-7 manned station. They were relatively short lived, but gave 2-way communications to properly equipped stations.

    http://www.spacetoday.org/Satellites/HandLaunchedS ats.htmlA quick synopsis of hand-launched sats

  40. Wierd expectation. by reality-bytes · · Score: 3, Informative

    That would seem to indicate that if the ISS didnt make any prograde burns, it too would be entering the atmosphere in several weeks.

    I say wierd because I had presumed that ISS, like Mir would take a few months to reach an unrecoverable orbit which would lead to a re-entry.

    SO, they throw it downwards when they launch the suit? Well, Im no physicist - and this is only what I remember from my school days; if you were to throw something downwards with the maximum force available to a human from the ISS, then the object would return to you hours or days later because its angular velocity in relation to the orbit wouldnt have changed.

    In order to actually alter the continous orbit of the suit as you launch it, you would have to either throw the suit out ahead of the ISS (To make it go higher) or throw it backwards along the ISS orbit to make it go lower.

    However, I would rather suspect that an overhand throw of a spacesuit wouldnt make any siginificant difference in the time taken for re-entry to occur.

    Come to think of it. - Every force has an equal and opposite. which indicates that the ISS crew are going to have to fashion some sort of rocket to get the suit going. - A small compresses air cylinder would come to mind but would be hard to aim. You could of course blow it from the airlock but youd have to correct the ISS orbit using Progress afterwards.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Wierd expectation. by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would seem to indicate that if the ISS didnt make any prograde burns, it too would be entering the atmosphere in several weeks.

      According to Wikipedia, "The station, on average, loses 100 meters of altitude per day." (and is periodically reorbitted).

      Of course the station has much higher mass compared to the suit. Since (for a given exposed surface area) the atmospheric drag is the same but the mass is less for the suit, the drag will decellerate the suit at a higher rate to the station. Obviously the surface areas aren't the same, but the station is waaaay heavier. As the orbitting object slows down, it loses altitude and drops into thicker atmosphere so a reasonably small difference in the drag:mass ratio to start with leads to an amplified effect as time goes on.

      Come to think of it. - Every force has an equal and opposite. which indicates that the ISS crew are going to have to fashion some sort of rocket to get the suit going.

      Again, the mass of the station is hugely more than the mass of the suit so the effect on the station is tiny. Besides, does it matter if you alter the station's velocity slightly? It makes sense to throw the suit towards the "back" of the station since otherwise you might catch up with it as it slows down - throwing the suit backwards increases the station's orbital velocity slightly, increasing the altitude of the orbit (which simply means you leave it a bit longer before you have to reboost the station's orbit). And you don't need to worry about upsetting the station's attitude since it has gyroscopes to maintain that.

      On a related note, read up on the use of gyroscopes for attitude control on space craft - it's very interesting. The gyroscopes provide a "fixed" object to rotate the spacecraft around, so you can maintain the attitude of the craft by simply rotating the craft around the gyroscopes with electric motors instead of having to fire reaction control thrusters (which uses valuable fuel that you have to fly up from ground).

    2. Re:Wierd expectation. by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      Actually, thowing it behind you would increase your speed relative to earth and thus increase the height of your orbit.

  41. Dead body by parasonic · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, at least the spacesuit won't be crammed with a dead Frank Poole.

    1. Re:Dead body by perdu · · Score: 1
      Well, at least the spacesuit won't be crammed with a dead Frank Poole.
      I wonder, maybe there's trying to get rid of a body! Perhaps a stowaway like The Coyote in The Mars Trilogy?
      --
      You only use 2% of your DNA
  42. I've Got An Old VW Bug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    to donate to the cause.

    It can protect the radio gear better than a mere spacesuit. Besides, if you can land it, it can still run!

    Bumper sticker -> Bugs in Space!

  43. I'm totally seeing a Futarama moment by syntap · · Score: 1

    Neat, novel satellite hardware is chucked out of the space station.

    On the other side of the Earth on the orbit path, the twain shall meet again and the novel invention rams a solar panel, causing ISS to hurtle down to Earth.

    1. Re:I'm totally seeing a Futarama moment by slim-t · · Score: 1
      Futurama wouldn't do that, they'd know that there's near zero chance of throwing something out of the ISS and then meeting it again. Sure, if you don't put much change in velocity on the thing, it will follow you around for quite a while, but it won't hit you.

      More likely, the space suit would make a splat on the delivery ship's windshield and Leela would turn on the wipers to clean it off.

  44. Why not...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we send politicians instead? At least, if something goes wrong we don't loose anything we may need.

  45. Need To Revise Space Elevator Design... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We need to heft it up to account for all the spacesuits, VW bugs, old satellites, tossed-out desks and armchairs and shit flying around in space once it becomes Earth's junkyard.

    One South American poet writes how embarrassing it was for a son's father to die in a hurricane from a flying banana. But it would be even more embarrassing to arrive in space only to be run over by a VW beetle going 15,000 MPH.
    [

    Godam CAPTCHA is messing with my eyes!]

  46. Aliens, Conversing About Earth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Well, yeah, they're sorta civilized. The problem is gettin' through their defense shield."

    Europeans in the Middle Ages tossed their "night soil" (feces et al) out windows onto the roadways each morning. Now we hurl our shit into space.

  47. Dead man? by popedave · · Score: 1

    That'll look strange in orbit to any 'unexpecting' viewers.

  48. Pictures? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like the part about the schools being allowed to supply one 8-1/2 by 11 inch picture, make absolutely sure it is in jpeg format because they burn up better, to be included on a CD, in order to be burned up with the suit.

    Teacher: Mary, your artwork is so good, were going to burn it. And it's not going to be a normal "throw it in the incinerator" type of burn; we are going to burn it in the most incredible heat possible, and spread the ashes all over the planet so there is no possibility of recovery.

    Mary: ....

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  49. Burning Man by lexbaby · · Score: 1
    SuitSat is expected to orbit the planet for several weeks before burning up when it enters Earth's atmosphere


    Aren't they taking this "Burning Man" festival a little too far?
    --
    lexbaby
    "Be Brave, Be Loyal, Be True." -- Hawkeye Pierce
  50. Saves 0.1% of the cost of a satellite?!? by birge · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, so given that it costs something like millions of dollars to launch even a small few pound payload, why the hell are they worried about the cost of making a real satellite? My understanding is that you can make something space hardened fairly easily (which is the only point of the suit, AFAIK) and that the vast majority of the cost of a simple satellite comes from the launch.

    Plus, having a human shaped thing floating around in orbit gives me the creeps. Can you imagine what that looks like to other life forms? "Xzarg, look what these people do to their criminals! Fuck this, keep driving."

  51. I like your accounting style. by Paul+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    I like your accounting style. Did you work for Enron?

    Even worse, it is going to cost a lot of money to bring those stupid elementary school drawings up there. There is a large cost per kilogram of payload on every ship. Maybe they could save some money by printing it on surplus paper.

    What is the scientific merit here? Let's fund some scientific research, such as Voyager or Hubble. This is asinine. Maybe we ought to declare the whole ISS as "surplus" and sell our share to the Chinese. It's surplus, so every penny is profit!

    They are probably using a space suit because the radiation shielding and temperature controls will allow them to use electronics that are not space hardened. It's a smaller waste of money that way.

    1. Re:I like your accounting style. by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

      the drawings were JPEGs on a CD. A single CD. And there is such a thing as building popular interest in science. That has a long-term scientific benefit from more researchers down the line.

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
  52. High earth orbiting satellites too by N3Bruce · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the past, hams have had some high earth orbiting birds up as well, which have allowed worldwide QSOs. Oscar 4, AO-10, AO-13, and AO-40 were high earth orbiting satellites, capable of worldwide QSOs and extended operating windows up to 10 hours long or more. Sadly, none of these satellites is currently considered operational. Of these, AO-10 is brain dead and has no attitude control, but occasionally the solar panels and the antennas line up in a favorable orientation as it tumbles through space, and communications are occasionally possible. AO-13 and AO-4 have reentered the atmosphere, after partial failure of their secondary boosters, but provided some service. AO-40 suffered a crippling explosion onboard about a month after launch, but was partially recovered and provided an S-band downlink, along with uplinks on 70cm, 23cm, and 3cm IIRC. It suffered a catastrophic battery failure in January, 2004 and has been silent ever since.

    Not to be discouraged, a new satellite, currently designated as Phase 3E is being prepared for launch by and will hopefully reach orbit later in 2005 or early 2006.

  53. Blown link by N3Bruce · · Score: 1

    Sorry about the blown link in the last paragraph, the link is for AMSAT-DL.

  54. Accounting by AntiCopyrightRadical · · Score: 1

    Hey, don't knock it. The only reason launch is 'expensive' is because of the resource games we play down here, and a lack of long range investors. If someone finds a way to negate the economic impacts of added launch weight, then we can start focusing on launching what is technically possible. (which is alot)
    If we ever get a real colonization program going, it will quite possibly involve some kind of government subsidy per colonist. With the economic impact off the launcher, the ships will be made as large as possible (up to the limit of what the government can afford)

    So if enron-style accounting can get us 'free' launch mass, I say go for it. This could be the greatest moment in the history of spaceflight.

    --
    Abolish Copyright. Restore Freedom.
  55. Repeating Radio message. by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1
    "I can't believe you locked me out! Come on guys, let me back in! My air is getting low!"

    Then time the thing to scream about 15 minutes before re-entry.

    That should keep the Aliens away for a bit.
  56. Call me a packrat but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why wouldn't they just ziptie the suit to the outside of the station somewhere. Given the cost of bringing stuff into orbit, I can't see why they would just throw this away. Aside from any potentially useful parts for emergency (ore even permanent) repair, it could even be useful down the road as plain old reaction mass.

  57. Oops. by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    I'm truly sorry. I thought he was the satellite. So how do you plan to retrieve him?

  58. Oh good, some details! by howlingmoki · · Score: 1

    My father (K6QXB) was telling me about this over Memorial Day weekend, but I'd had a bit much beer and don't remember much about it. Thanks for refreshing my memory, /.!

  59. The radio stuff is ok, but the CD? Gimme a break. by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    Ok, I can see some interest in some amateur experiments with radio in this thing, but what's the point of sticking a CD full of student artwork in it just to have it get fried after a couple of weeks? They could throw some artwork into an incinerator on earth and get as much out of it. If that's all they can think to do with this thing, it's a particularly powerful indicator of how bad science education has gotten...

    If they want some kids to express themselves, have them put the artwork up on the web or in a gallery or something-- giving them the impression that "flying" it in a spacesuit is anything but a circle-jerk is really pathetic.

  60. Aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aliens : "hey there's a poor man around the Earth to rescue!"

    Aliens : "it will take 2 days to get there but let's go"

    Aliens : "Damn, it's just a fucking space suit!"

  61. A few minutes after they release the suit-sat... by nytes · · Score: 1

    "NASA, the suit-sat has been deployed and is now 500 meters away. It's an interesting looking satellite, with the arms waving about as the suit tumbles.

    "Um, where's Commander Jones? Anyone seen him around?"

    --
    -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  62. Who Cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about satellites thrown into orbit from the window of the iss...

    I wanna see a geocache thrown into orbit from the window of the iss!

  63. Better option by Handpaper · · Score: 1
    Rent some time on Goonhilly, Jodrell Bank or similar, and transmit the images, preceded by a brief hello and decompression instructions, toward the centre of the Milky Way, at full power (about half a megawatt).
    Depending on who you ask, there's a good chance of them being detected and viewed by an alien civilisation at some time in the future.
    I think that beats incinerating a CD-R, don't you?

    1. Re:Better option by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      Your method does sound better. Maybe they weren't thinking so practically. My guess is that one party proposed an idea that incorporated the kids, the other obliged. I'm sure that this wasn't the optimal method or the most necessary project, but I still stick to my opinion that for the kids it was something cool, that's all. Simply, a fun little project for the schoolkids who have the opportunity for the rest of their lives to say "Hey! My class project got taken into outer space."

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
  64. AI+ ARRL by Cutler+Hammer · · Score: 1

    Let's hope the stuff being chucked out the window doesn't have any AI, else the message sent back will look like:

    dah ditditditdit dit dahditdahdah dah ditditditdit ditdahdit dit ditdahdah dahdah dit dahdahdah ditditdah dah dah ditditditdit dit ditdahdah ditdit dahdit dahditdit dahdahdah ditdahdah ditditdit dah dahdahdah ditdahdahdit ditdahdahdit ditdahditdit dit ditdah ditditdit dit ditditdit dit dahdit dahditdit ditditditdit dit ditdahditdit ditdahdahdit ditditdit dah dahdahdah ditdahdahdit dahditdit ditdah dahdah dahdit ditdit ditdahdahdahdahdit dahdah dahditdahdit dahdahdah ditdahditdit dahditdit ditditdit dah dahdahdah ditdahdah

  65. Re:Obvious question-- Era, Wisk, or Woosh? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    OK, some bad one-liners...

    "In SPACE, nobody can hear that suit scream..."

    WHy SHOULDN't this be attempted? After all, I guess, ummm, it *suits* their purposes...

    Better not put a "pocket rocket" into that thing... it might blast off onto something...

    Or, even just a wee-wee bit of pocket pool, and that suit could go shooting off or shooting on some new uncharted course...

    Talk about USED clothing... Imagine if instead of it falling into and burning up in the atmosphere Uranus somehow enveloped that suit:

    You've got RING around the Coh-lurh

    And, if those clothes/that suit bump into another orbital device and damage it, I imagine it won't generate a lot of... "Goodwill", hehe

    But, if we name the project "Pluto" and put a Macy's LOAD of asteroid-washed suits around a certain planet, we truly COULD state: "IN SPACE we have Plutonic rings around UrAnus"...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"