Slashdot Mirror


London Turned into Giant Board Game

webponce writes "Hasbro have fitted out 18 London cabs with GPS tracking devices, and hooked them up to a real time, real life game of monopoly. You get to choose which cab driver you want to 'play' with, and then pick which properties around London you want to put your houses and hotels, hit go, sit back and wait for the other cab drivers to land on your square and make you rent. You get 24 hours of your cab running around London, and you have to see how much money you can make in a day (my bet, put your property on Wimbledon this week ;)"

272 comments

  1. Obligitory spelling error by poobread · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    London Tuned into Giant Board Game

    1. Re:Obligitory spelling error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      "ObliGITory spelling error"

      hmm...

    2. Re:Obligitory spelling error by njcoder · · Score: 1

      What station?

    3. Re:Obligitory spelling error by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      London Tuned into Giant Board Game

      Some idiot marked that "redundant". Maybe pointng out spelling and grammatical errors in a samzenpus story is redundant, but I'll add that "London" and "Wimbledon", in quaint British usage, normally have capital letters.

    4. Re:Obligitory spelling error by benna · · Score: 1

      I thought you meant the parents misspelling of the word karma.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
  2. but... by torrents · · Score: 5, Funny

    real life counterstrike would be better... guess you'd have to go to iraq for that though...

    --
    Get your torrents...
    1. Re:but... by jamesh · · Score: 2, Funny

      A few problems I can think of...

      1. You wouldn't be in direct control of the soldiers, they'd just go where they wanted to.
      2. Assuming you could work around the above, then lag might be a problem.
      3. I doubt that neither allied or enemy soldiers would consent to having remotely readable GPS units attached to their person.

    2. Re:but... by Raul654 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      . I doubt that neither allied or enemy soldiers would consent to having remotely readable GPS units attached to their person

      Actually, it wouldn't surprise me in the least if US soldiers had GPS trackers on their person trasmitting their individual locations (all encrypted, of course) - it's the kind of thing that the people in HQ 30 miles away could use to direct a battle.

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    3. Re:but... by dominiv · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, I can only agree and do not see why this is regarded as being a troll, the parent has a valid point, especially since we know that american soldiers are nowadays trained using shoot-em up's. Heck, the american army even releases their own shoot-em up.

      Shoot-em ups are fun, if you keep yourself saying they are not for real. They become disgusting and dangerous if they are a replacement and/or training for real life.

    4. Re:but... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1, Funny

      If Iraq was real life Counter strike , Then a shed load of troops would have been server banned for PKing and abusing the hostages

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    5. Re:but... by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why do you think there was so much friendly fire in Iraq? Fucking campers.

    6. Re:but... by ISaidItOmega · · Score: 5, Funny
      You're missing the biggest problem of all:

      The US soldiers would probably give up their positions once the Iraqis heard them shouting "FUX0RING N00BS!!!11" or "thiS GUYS USING a WaLLHACK!!"

      ....fucking Iraqis and their wallhacks..

    7. Re:but... by ISaidItOmega · · Score: 1
      Wait, now that I think about it, where's the real life Leisure Suit Larry? I tried to play it a few times, and I think I beat it once..

      ..the prize for winning is the clap right?

    8. Re:but... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that they would be transmitting this data is enough to track them, you dont need to decrypt the signals. Just by capturing hte data, you can work out if there are troops near your position and that gains you a significant advantage.

    9. Re:but... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      And all joking aside, you'd be better off being on the terrorists side out there right now.

      The place is in an absolute shambles :(

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    10. Re:but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they, like me, do care about things but don't take every single second of their life that seriously.

      You gotta smile every now and then.

    11. Re:but... by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Both. You and those who make similar comments need to realize at some point that different people on the same website can have different viewpoints.

      --
      -mkb
    12. Re:but... by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      Look, when you've rescued some hostages but forgot a few, do you want to drag their sorry butts through the entire map? No, so you cap 'em and win the round.

      I can see how this would not be beneficial to international relationships, but Counterstrike solves this by not having this 'international' thing; just terrorists and counter-terrorists.

    13. Re:but... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      OFcourse what witht he lack of terrorists in iraq , they would need to balance out the sides a bit , perhaps forcing new recruits to play terrorists.
      Actually after they got rid of sadam a number of new terrorist players did start to appear

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    14. Re:but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK MR over-rated troll ,. fuck off would you.

    15. Re:but... by jthayden · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you beat it more than once but what does that have to do with the game?

    16. Re:but... by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Which is why most devices designed to be used in this manner operate over bands that are almost undectectable unless you know exactly when and where to look. Stuff like Ultrawideband microbursts.

      While a significantly advanced party would probably still be able to detect the signal, the majority of what a typical US soldier faces wouldn't have a snowball's chance.

    17. Re:but... by rho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They might have such devices, but it's not so that generals in remote locations can direct a battle. The Army spends a lot of time and money training their soldiers and officers to be independent thinkers and to react intelligently to new situations, but grounded on solid foundations of tactics and mission objectives. Directing blips on a screen is more likely to be harmful than useful. There's a lot that simple locations cannot tell you about what's going on on the ground.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    18. Re:but... by r_jensen11 · · Score: 0

      You sunk my battleship! You bastard!

    19. Re:but... by bynary · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Based on what information? Here's a common scenario (based on news coverage):

      U.S. Army discovers roving band of insurgents. U.S. Army decides that roving bands of insurgents is not a good thing. U.S. Army decides to destroy roving band of insurgents. U.S. Army sends 1,000 soldiers with M-16s, 5 M-1 Bradleys, and 3 Apache attack helicopters to engage the roving band of insurgents. They meet somewhere out in the desert.

      Results:
      Insurgents killed: 50 - 100 out of about 300.
      American Soldiers killed: none, but one guy sprained his ankle and another one got a migraine

      By far, the majority of U.S. casualties in Iraq are because of IEDs. The insurgents know by now that they flat out cannot win a face-to-face firefight.

      In conclusion, how do you figure it's better to be on the Ts?

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    20. Re:but... by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Oh, I realize that.

      However, most of /. is no longer the way it used to be. It was mostly Libertarian before. Now it's very left wing.

      However, it is interesting to notice their hypocracy in this case. The mob will always come by to astroturf around my posts, it makes no sense that the same mob would mod this up.

      This is addition and subtraction. If there are a greater number who feel that way, then this post should have gone down. It did not, but there are.

    21. Re:but... by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      The mob will always come by to astroturf around my posts, it makes no sense that the same mob would mod this up.

      Apparently you don't realize what I said if you think there's only one mob.

      --
      -mkb
    22. Re:but... by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      I understand that.

      50 Right wingers who love blood and gore upmod it.
      100 Left wingers who hate blood and gore downmod it.

      Get it?

    23. Re:but... by HexRei · · Score: 1

      not to mention that both sides would be kickbanned after five minutes for killing hostages.

    24. Re:but... by joelanders · · Score: 1

      Real life GTA?

    25. Re:but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you get seven personal virgins in heaven by blowing yourself up, how could you lose?

    26. Re:but... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Actually, it wouldn't surprise me in the least if US soldiers had GPS trackers on their person trasmitting their individual locations (all encrypted, of course) - it's the kind of thing that the people in HQ 30 miles away could use to direct a battle.

      You can encrypt the signal all you want, but all you need to find those soldiers are 2 antenae that can pick up the gps signal in 2 slightly different locations, and a map.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    27. Re:but... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      The Army spends a lot of time and money training their soldiers and officers to be independent thinkers and to react intelligently to new situations, but grounded on solid foundations of tactics and mission objectives. Directing blips on a screen is more likely to be harmful than useful.

      Possibly in a any army but the americans or for the officers. The US army has a reputation of making fit and able but dumb minions who do one job and only one job. They rely on logistical and strategic planning more then on individual prowess of their soldiers. Their special forces are different, but their regular infantry are ussually described as idiots with a gun by my army buddies who go on excercise with them.

      It doesn't mean the US army isn't capable, but their individual soldiers are throughly expendable.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    28. Re:but... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Can you track an AA missile site's position by its IFF signal?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    29. Re:but... by kchilders · · Score: 1

      Actually in military wargaming with real troops and notional troops, the commanders tend to favor the real troops. All support assets are supposed to be allocated as though they were all real, but human nature being what it is doesn't work that way.

      --
      Kevin M. Childers
      Computer repair and networking tech.
      Available over most messaging services as KC1111111111
  3. What Frequency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    What frequency is this giant board game broadcasting on?

    1. Re:What Frequency? by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      What frequency. . .

      Give up the AC bit Dan, we know it's you.

      KFG

  4. Monopoly for CEOs by michaeldot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Steve Jobs is also playing and he's landed on Regent Street.

    1. Re:Monopoly for CEOs by Life+Jockey · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's actually a Microsoft demo of their new game.. "Where do you want to go today?"

  5. i'm "playing" this now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    basically you set it up, it ticks for 24hrs, then at the end it tells you how much money you made. im on about 300m last i checked, the game ends at 24hrs and you start again.

    it isn't fun.

    1. Re:i'm "playing" this now by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      I agree. This is a a neat idea. It could be a fun game. I wish that it were.

      It's not BAD. I wouldn't run home in tears if I were the developer of this game or anything.

      I don't think that I'll play it again though.

    2. Re:i'm "playing" this now by spongeboy · · Score: 5, Funny

      yeah, but it did help me come second in a beauty contest.

    3. Re:i'm "playing" this now by Norgus · · Score: 1

      Assuming its possible to make a loss of money by 'landing on' other players 'houses' then you could bet real money proportional to the game money against other people.
      I'm sure that would make for a more interesting experience.

    4. Re:i'm "playing" this now by pcmanjon · · Score: 5, Informative

      I happen to be friends with one of the guys who works at Hasbro; and he's told me it isn't GPS controlled as they claim.

      This is just marketing to make it appealing and feel "real."

      He's told me that although he didn't do any of the programming work for the cab stuff, he has done some apache configuration and stuff for the server.

      He tells me that they used a "deamon" like program coded in C to sned the current location to an SQL database, and the webserver handles it from there.

      It makes sense that they would make it all fake to save money, having GPS's and stuff for real cabs just seems like too much work.

    5. Re:i'm "playing" this now by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      eh? They use a "daemon like program coded in C" (typical web developer, thinks anything that isn't script is just some black art that does nothing serious) that places location coordinates in a database.... Sounds suspiciously like an AVL system is set up.. and you can do AVL using GPS nowadays (though radio triangulation used to be more common).

      I know it may sound like science fiction to a web developer, but AVL systems have ben used for years and years. Using GPS makes sense to reduce the costs of the vehicle hardware. Do a google for AVL and see the hits.

    6. Re:i'm "playing" this now by CortoMaltese · · Score: 1, Redundant
      I'd be willing to believe there's no GPS or anything real cab positioning system involved.

      I am playing the game right now. The game gives you updates every 15 minutes. And every 15 minutes I end up paying rent to someone. Consider a city the size of London, the traffic there, less than 40 locations spread about the city, and a cab driving around. There is no way the cab could pass one of those locations every 15 minutes.

      My judgement is that the game is a hoax. (Although a nice one at that.)

    7. Re:i'm "playing" this now by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      He tells me that they used a "deamon" like program coded in C to sned the current location to an SQL database, and the webserver handles it from there.

      Just let's hope it's not a Microsoft SQL server database. And if it is, they'd better make sure their cabs don't pick up any Irish fares...

    8. Re:i'm "playing" this now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're not funny.

    9. Re:i'm "playing" this now by eoinmadden · · Score: 1

      Me and everybody else in my office thinks its fun!

    10. Re:i'm "playing" this now by Xantharus · · Score: 1

      Too bad you were the only one who entered.

    11. Re:i'm "playing" this now by superstick58 · · Score: 1

      My question is, who "came" first?

    12. Re:i'm "playing" this now by coopex · · Score: 1

      It's not a unrealistic as you make it seem. If the locations were chosen randomly, then sure, you'd be right, but I would think that they had the GPS in the cabs for some time, collecting data as to the most popular areas, and then choosing 40 of them.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    13. Re:i'm "playing" this now by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      I used to know someone who drove a private cab. He had a route he followed that included a quick drive through to the airport every time he passed it. Maybe you got one of those ;) Airport, dropoff, donut shop, airport, dropoff, lunch, airport, dropoff, hey look a girl!

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    14. Re:i'm "playing" this now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me and everybody else in my office thinks its fun!

      Well, you obviously don't think work is fun (and neither does anyone in your office).

    15. Re:i'm "playing" this now by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Besides posting on Slashdot and playing Monopoly, do you do any work? :-)

    16. Re:i'm "playing" this now by eoinmadden · · Score: 1

      I don't come all the way into the office just to do WORK!

    17. Re:i'm "playing" this now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to log in. Now how do you prove to Microsoft that it's you (and not one of your fellow 'turfers) who posted that witty and insightful comment?

    18. Re:i'm "playing" this now by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Pfft, other people's houses? Supreme Court just confirmed emminent domain and you land on other people's houses?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  6. Huh? by xiaomonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems....um...random?

    What exactly is the added trill of having the position of your player on a monoploy board correlated with the position of a real life cabby?

    I guess I just don't get it.

    1. Re:Huh? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      And a dice roll is deterministic? The only real difference I see with this is that the cab's don't travel around the board, they go from anywhere to anywhere else directly.

      Even the concept of jail probably exists if the cabbie does something wrong.

    2. Re:Huh? by Volvogga · · Score: 1

      So... is this game rated for "All Ages" then? If so, then I can see the looming backlash after the first, "You're cabbie gets into a drunken bar fight and is arrested. Go directly to jail. Do not pass go, do not collect $200."

      --
      Vol~
    3. Re:Huh? by aussie_a · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's actually more fun for the passengers.

      Cab: Where do you want to go?
      Passenger: Regent Street
      Cab: You sure you really want to go there? I hear they've got some hotels on that street.
      Passenger: Yeah I'm sure.
      Cab: Alright. ....10 minutes later a police-man pulls them over....

      Cab: What's the problem officer?
      Policeman: This one of them monopoly cabs?
      Cab: Yup.
      Policeman: Can you and your passenger get out of the vehicle, this street has been designated the go to jail street.
      Cab: Aaah shit.
      Passenger: Don't worry, I've got a get out of jail free card.

    4. Re:Huh? by -pms-mistletoe · · Score: 1

      I actually find it quite interesting that they've tied it in with real cabbies; as another poster pointed out, this week is a really good week to choose Wimbledon, but if it were a simulator I doubt you'd get that effect. At weekends you might want to not choose The City, too; it's that human aspect that makes it fun to play.

      --
      "Frag the weak, hurdle the dead, and assassinate those cursed snipers."
    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Passenger: Don't worry, I've got a get out of jail free card.

      Visa. It's everywhere you want to be.

  7. Make Way by tdmg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Watch out horses, Vegas, and greyhounds. Make way for the next level in high stakes betting. Who wouldn't be willing to put down a few real dollars ( or pounds) on a real live Monopoly game for once? I can see it now, Hasbro goes from clean cut toy company and becomes a modern day Mafia. Leading the way to high tech illegal gambling and racketeering.

    --
    "Man, I am so unbelievably stupid."
    1. Re:Make Way by b0r0din · · Score: 1

      Hasbro goes from clean cut toy company and becomes a modern day Mafia. Leading the way to high tech illegal gambling and racketeering.

      And this is different from a modern corporation in what way?

  8. Prize is someone pays your mortgage for a year by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 2, Funny

    And you have to send them your email address to sign up.

    Apparently I've been receiving notices about this game for the past year or so and just didn't realize it was Hasbro.

    Stop spam!

  9. Oldschool Monopoly ... by egypt_jimbob · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oldschool cardboard-and-paper Monopoly is boring as hell. This sounds much more fun, since you can just get out of the cab and go to the pub.

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    1. Re:Oldschool Monopoly ... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1, Funny

      If Hasbro really want fun, Ms. Pacman in london should be next. Just some lady in a yellow-suit going around eating people when she collects enough dots... oh wait....

    2. Re:Oldschool Monopoly ... by Max_Abernethy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed, alcohol is better. Last time I was playing monopoly, I traded all my property for vodka and cookies.

    3. Re:Oldschool Monopoly ... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Yeah and stealing money from the bank in this version requires a shotgun, Lego houses become more expensive than actual houses ,and looking at the community chest gets you slapped

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    4. Re:Oldschool Monopoly ... by skeib · · Score: 1

      Where I live (Oslo, Norway), we have a localized version of monopoly with Oslo streets. I once tried to have a beer in every street on the board during a weekend. I almost made it :)

    5. Re:Oldschool Monopoly ... by TERdON · · Score: 1
      Or you could play the old cardboard variant at the pub, perhaps?

      Btw, we have a localized variant in Sweden too...

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
    6. Re:Oldschool Monopoly ... by Hungus · · Score: 1

      No, looking at the community chest requires opening to page 3

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    7. Re:Oldschool Monopoly ... by LocoMan · · Score: 1

      Probably most countried have localized versions. At least if we have one here in Venezuela, I doubt there are too many countries left without one.. :)

    8. Re:Oldschool Monopoly ... by coopex · · Score: 1

      Almost made it?!? What, you mean you didn't keep trying until you succeeded. Quitter.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
  10. Could be a trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Can't wait for "Halo 3, Bagdad".

    1. Re:Could be a trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't wait for "Halo 3, Bagdad".
      You do realise in real life you get shot, you DIE

    2. Re:Could be a trend by SparafucileMan · · Score: 1

      is that anything like the current Halo 2, Baghdad?

    3. Re:Could be a trend by FLEB · · Score: 1

      And theologists continue to debate respawn.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
  11. Does this mean... by bc90021 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...that some lucky cab rider gets a "Get Out Of Jail Free" card? If so, are there limits to what they can do to land themselves in jail? ;)

    1. Re:Does this mean... by ndansmith · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well the ironic thing about the Monopoly game is that you go to jail for no good reason. Basically going to jail is just bad luck. This probably captures the mindset of the early American monopolists quite well.

    2. Re:Does this mean... by bLanark · · Score: 0

      Well the ironic thing about the Monopoly game is that you go to jail for no good reason. Basically going to jail is just bad luck. This probably captures the mindset of the early American monopolists quite well.

      Good idea, but Monopoly was invented in Britain, dude.

      --
      Note to ACs: I won't mod you up, even if you are being funny or insightful. So take a chance! It's not real life!
    3. Re:Does this mean... by mmkkbb · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was 1934, the height of the Depression, when Charles B. Darrow of Germantown, Pennsylvania, showed what he called the MONOPOLY game to the executives at Parker Brothers. Can you believe it, they rejected the game due to "52 design errors"! But Mr. Darrow wasn't daunted. Like many other Americans, he was unemployed at the time, and the game's exciting promise of fame and fortune inspired him to produce it on his own.

      http://www.hasbro.com/monopoly/pl/page.history/dn/ default.cfm

      --
      -mkb
    4. Re:Does this mean... by bLanark · · Score: 1

      *blushes* Oops!

      --
      Note to ACs: I won't mod you up, even if you are being funny or insightful. So take a chance! It's not real life!
    5. Re:Does this mean... by gotw · · Score: 1

      You missed the best bit:

      The MONOPOLY game is so much a part of today's popular culture that my lawyers have trademarked many of its graphic elements. The tokens, Railroad, COMMUNITY CHEST, CHANCE, and Title Deed designs, as well as BOARDWALK and all four gameboard corners are legally protected.

      It's a bit slashdotinteresting isn't it? If it's that much a part of popular culture, when will it be public domain? I could print out my own monopoly money! Whoopee!!

    6. Re:Does this mean... by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure when trademarks expire, but wouldn't you be able to make copies of Monopoly money for personal use anyway?

      --
      -mkb
    7. Re:Does this mean... by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      trademarks never expire as long as they are enforced by the owner. if the owner stops enforcing it and it becomes a household word then the owner can lose the trademark.

      ianatl

    8. Re:Does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the game design was originally patented in 1904 as the "Landlord's Game". Parker Brothers bought the rights to the original game and other variations when they published the version presented to them by Charles Darrow.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_(game)

  12. you just.... by KillShill · · Score: 1, Funny

    passed DOWNING STREET, collect your shackles and report to lifetime imprisonment inside the tower of london.

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  13. crank cabbie callouts? by jamesh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not sure if the cab system differs in London compared to where I live, but I'd predict a large increase in abandoned calls from locations people have bought a lot of property on.

    1. Re:crank cabbie callouts? by fullcircleflight · · Score: 1

      You would have to make a LOT of phones calls to try and get one of the 18 cabs (out of however many there actually are in London) to arrive at one of the properties you "own" in the game, wouldn't you?

    2. Re:crank cabbie callouts? by screwballicus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I should think that London, like New York, has many thousands of cabs in its fleets (despite the comparatively strict regulation of the taxi system). What kind of dint can you make in that kind of business by sending out a few fake calls?

      Amidst real estate where several taxis pass by every minute, what do you do to substantially increase taxi visits? Hire out a call centre in India?

    3. Re:crank cabbie callouts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, each London cab is privately owned and run. You have to get licensed by the council, sure, and the fares are standardised, but the money you pay to the cabbie is 100% his.

      But yes, there are thousands of the buggers :)

    4. Re:crank cabbie callouts? by GQuon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know wether you're English or not, but I thought that in England you can't usually telephone to get a ride in a regular cab. The cabs that you book by phone are called "mini-cabs" and look different from the standard black ones.

      --
      Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    5. Re:crank cabbie callouts? by DrPepper · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can book a black cab in advance or a minicab. However, only black cabs can go around looking for business, and not all black cabs can be prebooked.

  14. Economical issues by Bifurcati · · Score: 1
    One has to think that with the current prices of petrol, cab maintenance, sallaries, parking fees and so forth, it'd be quite a bit of work to just break even, particularly when you only get $200 for going around the whole board just once.

    Perhaps this could become a new True Cost kind of standard!

  15. Go directly... by Bifurcati · · Score: 5, Funny
    In other news, thousands of Brits have been trying to hack the game so that Margaret Thatcher, and indeed any other of her party, land on the "Go Directly to Jail" square.

    Democrats flew President Bush over (on the pretense of buying him a pet sheep) for a similar trick, but Bush simply changed the constitution so that while he didn't have to go to jail, he did get to collect $200, and without having to pass Go, either. He then rewrote to board to read "Go directly to Guatanamo Bay. And stay there."

    1. Re:Go directly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realise Margaret Thatcher hasn't been leader of the Conservative Party since 1991 don't you?

    2. Re:Go directly... by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you serious? Man, what is President Reagan gonna do when he finds out about this!

    3. Re:Go directly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you could just stop fellating yourslef enough with your gun, old fella to prevent further brain damage, you will find that most brits actually HATE thatcher for her callousness and betrayal of the working class. she was brought up by a working class single mother herself.
      also we never belived the threat of Commies being only minutes away like you gullible americans.
      you live far away from everything yet you belive they are minutes away of getting you!

      you disappoint me no end.

      "speaking russian" indeed.

    4. Re:Go directly... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Yes a lot of Brits do hate MT, particulary middle class media types which is why we are now stuck with Lying Labour and Tony Blair.

    5. Re:Go directly... by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      Damn the liberal media!

    6. Re:Go directly... by Dusabre · · Score: 1

      Margaret Thatcher?

      Um...

      More like Tony Blair.

      Then again, you probably can't tell one from the other.

      [HINT] One disappeared a decade ago, the other will soon.

    7. Re:Go directly... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      It does amuse me that it's probably the same people who were sitting around at dinner parties during the 80's moaning about "Evil Thatch" and wanking themselves off about how great Labour were who are now moaning about how they have been sold down the river to an evil lying warmonger.

    8. Re:Go directly... by GWTPict · · Score: 1

      What constitution?

    9. Re:Go directly... by coopex · · Score: 0

      I'll bet he'll be so shocked he'll have a heart attack!

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    10. Re:Go directly... by plumby · · Score: 1

      Much as I agree with your general sentiment, I do have to point out that the US (or at least Alaska) was only around 85 KM from the USSR across the Bering Strait. Europe is not the only way that they could have got there.

    11. Re:Go directly... by rowanxmas · · Score: 1

      what do brits have against a Main Tank? I mean, it's a really good strategey...maybe he doesn't use his taunt enough to keep the casters safe.

  16. No Wimbeldon by os2fan · · Score: 3, Informative
    For those who have not seen a proper monopoly board, the streets are (by colour-group, from Go)
    • Old Kent Road, Whitechapel
    • The Angel of Islington, Euston Road, Pentenville Road
    • Pall Mall, Whitehall, Northumberland Ave
    • Bow street, Malborough street, Vine street
    • The Strand, Fleet street, Trafalgar Square
    • Leister square, coventry square, piccadilly
    • Regent street, Oxford street, Bond street
    • Park Lane, Mayfair.

    The railway stations are in order, Kings Cross, Marylebone, Fenchurch Street, Liverpool Street.

    Utilities are Electric Company and Water-Works.

    You still have chance and community chest, with such joys as "go back three spaces", and "take a walk on the broad walk, advance token to mayfair", although not the German "go back to Old Kent Road".

    --
    OS/2 - because choice is a terrible thing to waste.
    1. Re:No Wimbeldon by jonwil · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course, that is only on a British monopoly board.
      American boards, Australian boards, Star Wars boards, Star Trek boards, Simpsons boards and others have totally different stuff :)

    2. Re:No Wimbeldon by defy+god · · Score: 1

      they are releasing an updated version which i think is the reason for this whole giant board game stunt. this version adds the newer, more expensive properties in London and drops some of the older properties. i didn't see Wimbledon in there, though.

      --
      hackers of the world unite!
    3. Re:No Wimbeldon by indianajones428 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I guess they aren't using the standard British Monopoly setup, because there is a Wimbeldon. IIRC, it's about where St. James Place usually is on the American board.

      On the "Monopoly Live" board, the streets are (sorry for any spelling errors):

      -Portobello Road Market, Camden Market
      -Hammersmith Apollo, Wembley Arena, GMTV
      -The Oval, Wimbeldon, Wembley Statium
      -Science Museum, Natural History Museum, Tate Museum
      -London Eye, Hyde Park, Trafalgar Square
      -Tottenham Court Road, Covent Garden, Regent Street
      -Notting Hill, Soho, Kings Road
      -Canary Wharf, The City

      The railway stations are now airports, and are in order: London City Airport, Stansted Airport, Gatwick Airport, and Heathrow Airport

      Utilities are Telecoms and The Sun

      There is still Chance and Community Chest, but you have to text message for those, so your guess is as good as mine (anyone in England willing to tell the rest of us what they are like?).

      --
      When a thing has been said, and said well, have no scruple. Take it and copy it. --Anatole France
    4. Re:No Wimbeldon by Kevertje · · Score: 1

      Actually, that is an *old* British monopoly board. This is a giant advertising stunt to introduce the new board. It had a complete overhaul and property values are a little more realistic now ;-)

    5. Re:No Wimbeldon by Muttley · · Score: 4, Informative

      Growing up in Australia I always thought the UK edition of the game was the 'true' version of monopoly, but the game was in fact invented in America, and so the original version, and the version used in all monopoly world championships, is the American version of the game.

      --
      M.
    6. Re:No Wimbeldon by bluepaq2000 · · Score: 1, Informative

      I tried the Chance text and got this: Make general repairs on your houses and hotels £1,500,000.00 for hotels and £500,000.00 for houses You have 24 hours to deposit the real money or we break your legs!

      --
      Want an iPod for free? Click the my homepage link
    7. Re:No Wimbeldon by stiggle · · Score: 1

      Probably the only time The Sun would be classed as a utility - wonder how much Rupert Murdoch (Fox News, 20th Century, Sky, etc) paid for that to appear.

    8. Re:No Wimbeldon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing as they appear to be the investigation department of the government at the moment, not very much. Maybe you can get supplies of blu-tak there or something.

    9. Re:No Wimbeldon by apesaga · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't the reason that it's not the standard layout is that it's being run to promote the new version of the game which has taken into account the fact that London has changed considerably since Monopoly was first launched?

      See http://www.monopolylive.com/the_board_game.html

      (I think this is in addition to the "classic" version, not a replacement).

    10. Re:No Wimbeldon by Cougem · · Score: 1

      The Sun is quite the tool.

    11. Re:No Wimbeldon by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      LOL I don't know what is funnier. The statement itself or the moron who modded that informative.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    12. Re:No Wimbeldon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A proper monopoly board has Board Walk, Park Place and none of those streets that you listed.

    13. Re:No Wimbeldon by Fragglebabe · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, that's interesting. For as long as I can remember, I have been playing Monopoly on the board that my mother used as a child, and there was not one card that began "Take a walk on the broadwalk..." though there was an "Advance directly to Mayfair". There was also most definitely a "Go Back to Old Kent Road" because it used to annoy the hell out of me. And before you ask, I am British, and although my board is only 50 years old, I'm inclined to say that it has all the original features included in the game. How old is your board?

      --
      Insane people are always sure they are fine. It is only the sane people who are willing to admit that they are crazy.
    14. Re:No Wimbeldon by julesh · · Score: 1

      Of course, that is only on a British monopoly board.
      American boards, Australian boards, Star Wars boards, Star Trek boards, Simpsons boards and others have totally different stuff :)


      There are actually multiple designs of British board, also. For instance, you can get a Coventry edition. I assume the same is true for other cities, probably throughout the world.

    15. Re:No Wimbeldon by HexRei · · Score: 1

      "Boardwalk" is an american property. The game is originally american, I believe?

    16. Re:No Wimbeldon by os2fan · · Score: 1
      The Commemerative 50th edition set, as well as the Australian sets from the fifties to seventies, all have the wording "take a walk on the broad walk, advance token to (Mayfair)", and no "Go back to (Old Kent Road)",

      They also show the same pictures of the monopoly man doing the same things (eg pushing a pram along the broad-walk).

      My brother has a german set, which features, among other things, go back to (old kent road), and "advance to (picadilly)".

      We used to play monopoly (with heavily distorted rules) quite a lot, and even though i have not played it for yonks, i still know the complete order of the board, as well as the bare site and hotel rentals of all the sites.

      The US names appear to be different, and appears to have not adopted the london set.

      The game existed some time before parker brothers acquired it. google for "anti-monopoly" + board-game.

      --
      OS/2 - because choice is a terrible thing to waste.
    17. Re:No Wimbeldon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol what

  17. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That was a belabored attempt at humor.

    YUO FAIL IT!!!!11!1!1

  18. I'm a hard core geek and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good thing Cancer, Aids, and Blindness have all been cured, so there is time to work on this shit!

    1. Re:I'm a hard core geek and all, but... by OzRoy · · Score: 1

      Because Hasbro are world leaders in cancer research!

      In fact they will probably use it as the theme for their next monopoly game. "Go directly to chemotherapy. Do not pass Go, do not collect $200 health insurance."

  19. There is no Wimbledon on a UK Monopoly board... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In fact, arguably the nearest of the properties on a UK Monopoly board to Wimbledon is Old Kent Road*, which, ironically, is the first and hence cheapest property on the board.

    If I were to make an educated guess, I'd say that either Euston Road, Picadilly or Trafalgar Square would win this competition, as they are major traffic arteries that cabs are always visible on.

    (*Both Wimbledon and the Old Kend Road are south of the River Thames. There maybe a property that is a little closer to Wimbledon, but anyone who's ever lived in London would know that trying to get a taxi cab to take you "south of the river" can sometimes be harder than drawing blood from a stone.)

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:There is no Wimbledon on a UK Monopoly board... by jeffChuck · · Score: 0

      Maybe there is no Wimbledon on a UK Monopoly board, but there is on Monopoly Live, and I have a hotel on it!

    2. Re:There is no Wimbledon on a UK Monopoly board... by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      Conversely, in your best Dick Van Dyke mockney accent: "There's them wot lives sarf of the river, and them wot wants to."

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    3. Re:There is no Wimbledon on a UK Monopoly board... by dumdeedum · · Score: 1

      If I were to make an educated guess, I'd say that either Euston Road, Picadilly or Trafalgar Square would win this competition, as they are major traffic arteries that cabs are always visible on.

      That's what you think, my money is on Mornington Crescent... everyone is always trying to get there.

    4. Re:There is no Wimbledon on a UK Monopoly board... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good call

    5. Re:There is no Wimbledon on a UK Monopoly board... by David+Horn · · Score: 1

      A taxi cab has to take you "south of the river" on request, lest they lose their licence. I've never had a problem with it when travelling in London, but don't get me started on mini-cabs...

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    6. Re:There is no Wimbledon on a UK Monopoly board... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Hasbro have released a new version of monopoly. Complete with corporate sponsorship (unless the Murdoch press is actually an essential utility)

    7. Re:There is no Wimbledon on a UK Monopoly board... by AGMW · · Score: 1
      That's what you think, my money is on Mornington Crescent... everyone is always trying to get there.

      I didn't see it in the rules, but does the new Monopoly allow straddling?

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    8. Re:There is no Wimbledon on a UK Monopoly board... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Ah, the old "or they'll lose their licence" line. OK, well that works in theory, but not always in practice.

      Especially late at night, more than a few taxi cab drivers are reluctant to go to far flung places from where they are very unlikely to pick up another fare that will want to take them back to a more customer-rich environment. It sucks, but that's the reality of the situation.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    9. Re:There is no Wimbledon on a UK Monopoly board... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I haven't a clue what you're talking about...

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  20. Better in Tokyo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    For ultimate realism, they should play in Tokyo where Godzilla can act as the dog that comes and eats your hotels.

    1. Re:Better in Tokyo by loftwyr · · Score: 1

      That's Real SimCity and it's coming to a manga near you...

  21. Monopoly is boring by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, I know Hasbro is running the game, but..

    Why not do something interesting like this based on a game that is actually fun to play. Puerto Rico, Catan, Carcassonne, etc. Especially in Europe where they don't play crap like Monopoly, and they play good games.

    1. Re:Monopoly is boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Real-life Clue?

      Die Professor Plum, Die.

    2. Re:Monopoly is boring by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I agree, I got bored of games like Monopoly and Risk years and years ago - they are just so tedious and boring so discovering all those German games was a real breathe of fresh air, they are actually genuinely exciting to play.

    3. Re:Monopoly is boring by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Where do you get that idea? Monopoly is quite a popular game over here.

      If you want to have fun with Monopoly, try playing with more than one board. We used to do this with a Dutch and an American board, laid down side-by-side. Odd or even dice rolls would determine whether you would take a right turn or go straight on (and onto the other board), and we had a 10% loss when exchanging money from Dutch to US (and vv). Complicates things no end.
      Other rule changes are also fun (have everyone play two 'pawns', allow more than 4 houses/1 hotel on a street, etc)

    4. Re:Monopoly is boring by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My favourite variant is 3 dice. Player chooses any two.

      Allow landlords to haggle over which two dice the player chooses ("if you land on my hotel I'll only charge you $100")

    5. Re:Monopoly is boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about playing it for real money. 6 players all contribute 50-100 ($ or £) to the bank, then the money you are playing for is real. Split the bank between the players at the end but the winner keeps all of their money (.01 per monopoly unit).
      Or try strip monopoly for a laugh. Each player starts with only 500 and if they run out they can sell an item of clothing for 500 (but it costs 750 to buy it back).

    6. Re:Monopoly is boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you borng assholes!

      just buy everything you land on
      then you win.

      hint: the game is called monopoly

      monopoly weirdos hate thet

      idiots.

      whata dull game

      i odnt really like games

    7. Re:Monopoly is boring by Threni · · Score: 1

      You're right - Monopoly IS really boring, which is why everybody cheats, and also everybody changes the rules to make it a little less dull (such as putting the money from fines into the centre of the board and giving it to players when they land on `free parking`, and abandoning the rule that says you have to buy a property or offer it for auction when you land on it), but it's still unaccountably popular in Europe (the UK at least) and people do play it.

    8. Re:Monopoly is boring by coopex · · Score: 1

      There's always real-life Risk, though it seems that after Germany stopped playing it kinda died.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    9. Re:Monopoly is boring by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      And I though I invented that. I have all kinds of variants. It is cool though because it makes it have some skill.

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
    10. Re:Monopoly is boring by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      I like the deck of dice...36 cards, typical 2 day distribution.

      There's so much you can do with it in monopoly. Players can have a hand of cards and choose which to play, they can trade/sell cards to other players, the cards can be auctioned by the bank to come into the game, it can normally be a die roll but there's some mechanic to buy cards and you have the option of using a card, or the basic idea of just using the deck to make sure the short term trends follow a normal distribution.

  22. Forget London... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Playing real-life Monopoly in London is kinda of dangerous with all the spooks, CIA agents, and Russians with posion-tipped umbellas running around. Personally, I would try my luck with a pissed off New York taxi driver since it would be safer as the muggers get run over more often than the pigeons.

    1. Re:Forget London... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Playing real-life Monopoly in London is kinda of dangerous with all the spooks, CIA agents, and Russians with posion-tipped umbellas running around. Personally, I would try my luck with a pissed off New York taxi driver since it would be safer as the muggers get run over more often than the pigeons.

      Nah, just bring with you a bullet proof hat with razor sharp brim. Looks dashing and is the best defence from spooks, CIA agents, and russians with poison tipped umbellas. But those nasty man eating bubbles that pop out of the sea, can't help you with those.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    2. Re:Forget London... by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      New York taxi drivers can be fun - I once got in a taxi somewhere around W.86th street and asked to be taken to Grand Central Station. The taxi driver thought for a minute and said "umm - OK, but do you mind if we go fast as I have just noticed one of my tyres has a slow puncture and I want to get back to the depot as soon as possible".

      Cue one ludicrous-speed taxi ride!!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    3. Re:Forget London... by pizen · · Score: 1

      Over 40 blocks of high-speed cab? Reminds me of a scene from The In-Laws where Sheldon and Vince are in a speeding cab in New York:
      Sheldon: Are we stopped?
      Vince: Yes, we're stopped.
      Sheldon: Did we hit the little boy on 6th Avenue?
      Vince: No, we missed him by a good foot and a half.

  23. Re:In Soviet Britain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not funny anymore....

    and this is why we don't have girlfriends....

  24. Boring story. Threadjack opportunity by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not to take away from the submitter or from anyone playing the game, but this story is pretty much a non-starter. Either you are playing or not, and if you aren't then there's really nothing to discuss.

    But I think we've all played Monopoly (R), so there is some level of commonality in our experiences. We used to have a "lottery" system where all taxes and fees paid were paid to the "pot" and anyone landing on Free Parking would win the pot. It gave losing players a chance to suddenly make a quick turnaround and made the game more interesting.

    What were the types of rule changes did you make to Monopoly when you played with your friends?

  25. Except that... by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    Except that this is all to advertise their new 'UP TO DATE' version of monopoly, with such wonders as 'The London Eye' 'Camden Markets' etc.

    So, even though I couldn't be shagged looking through all the properties on the board they have there, I bet Wimbeldon is there.

    1. Re:Except that... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Purple is for major stadia. Oval, wembley and wimbledon.

    2. Re:Except that... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 0
      So, even though I couldn't be shagged looking through all the properties on the board they have there, I bet Wimbeldon is there.
      So, someone looks it up, but your hunch is more likely to be correct? Monopoly is one of the two games on my mobile phone (ideal for a quick skive at work) and I assure you there is no Wimbledon. Now, everyone who didn't fail it can leave early. Er, where do you think you're going, spoco2?
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  26. Ummm... by Trejkaz · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. You wouldn't be in direct control of the soldiers, they'd just go where they wanted to.

    And this is different from Counter-Strike how, exactly?

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  27. US Version? by DingerX · · Score: 1, Funny

    Of course, with the success of the London edition, Hasbro is considering deploying a US Version (aka "The Original"), in which, as is known, the streets are those of Atlantic City, New Jersey.

    The Taxicabs will still be there, but to ensure proper coverage of the board, GPS transceivers will also be attached to a select number of Hookers, Pimps, and Retirees off the bus from NYC.

  28. Mornington Crescent, anyone? by Anomalous+Communard · · Score: 5, Informative

    London's been a board game for ages.

    1. Re:Mornington Crescent, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mornington Crescent station is actually at the *South* end of Camden High Street

      And Tim Brooke-Taylor is the shizzle.

    2. Re: Mornington Crescent, anyone? by gidds · · Score: 0
      All right then, who 'alf-inched the 'Mrs Trellis' nick? Bang goes my clever response from North Wales...

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    3. Re:Mornington Crescent, anyone? by Sathias · · Score: 1

      There is also a board game called Scotland Yard where one player plays an escaping crim and the others play detectives trying to track him around the city.

      --
      Blessed are the 1337, for they shall pwn the earth.
  29. Re:In Soviet Britain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no. "Soviet Britian" is HILARIOUS!

  30. Scam Delight by kristopher · · Score: 1

    What is to stop someone from getting in another player's chosen cab and keep going to their own property thus getting lots of money?

    1. Re:Scam Delight by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1, Funny

      What is to stop someone from getting in another player's chosen cab and keep going to their own property thus getting lots of money?

      Common sense.

    2. Re:Scam Delight by kristopher · · Score: 1

      Hah! You actually said 'Common Sense' on Slashdot. Haha!

    3. Re:Scam Delight by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the cabbies wouldn't mind massive attempts to fix the game that way. :) The site didn't say if the 18 cabs were marked in any way, so you might have to take a lot of rides to get the right one.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  31. Re:Boring story. Threadjack opportunity by poor_boi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It gave losing players a chance to suddenly make a quick turnaround...

    Sweet deities, you've found a way to make an already punishingly protracted game last even longer.

    Here's my idea for a MpyMod: start all the players out with five bucks so we can actually finish the game tonight.

  32. Re:In Soviet Britain... by MustardMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    not funny anymore....

    and this is why we don't have girlfriends....

    And here I thought it was the pimples, body odor, fat rolls, and complete lack of anything vaguely resembling social skills. Turns out, all along it was the soviet jokes! D'oh!

  33. Real Life Gaming by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

    This sounds a lot like an article I found linked off Ars yesterday. Apparently some companies are trying to combine LARPing with GPS and computer games to make some sort of real life game. Anyone know if there's anyone doing this in San Francisco?

    Gamers turn cities into a battleground

  34. Interesting Title by NilObject · · Score: 1, Troll

    London Tuned into Giant Board Game

    What key is that? A minor?

    I mean, I knew the editors were blind, but musical too? Who knew?!

    *ducks*

    1. Re:Interesting Title by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      I mean, I knew the editors were blind, but musical too? Who knew?!

      *ducks*


      How did the ducks know? And why should they care?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:Interesting Title by ImaLamer · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Union, Government Spellchecks You!!!

      *parries*

  35. Re:Boring story. Threadjack opportunity by Mister+Impressive · · Score: 1

    In about grade 4, during summer vacation, when it was too hot to stay outside from just playing in the pool, we played monopoly. Nonstop. We used the same rule you did, putting all taxes and such in the 'pot' and whoever landed on Free Parking would win it. I also distinctly remember setting fire to the 2 cards that made you pay for owning houses and hotels, because we made another rule for our SUPER LONG TYCOON MONOPOLY, allowing us to build up to 2 hotels per property, costing twice as much to build, but would cost the person landing there twice the amount of the hotel price on the card. You would could also build extra houses, which would then be calculated by adding the price of landing on the hotel and adding the price of the amount of houses on the property.

    The longest I've played monopoly for in one sitting would have to be 20 hours, with this version. It ended because we all fell asleep (it was only grade 4).

    --
    Let the commencement BEGINULATE!
  36. Re:Manchester cabbie was boorish by albyrne5 · · Score: 1
    "considering the relatively small area that London encompasses"
    Er ... relative to what? London is a huge city of about 7.5 million people covering 700 square miles!
  37. Why Monopoly by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Cool idea, but why the hell would they choose Monopoly as the game to be played this way? Monopoly is incredibly boring.

    Why not Scotland Yard? It's IDEAL to be played in the centre of London!

    1. Re:Why Monopoly by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Because that would defeat the point of Hasbros Publicity stunt for the new version of Monopoly

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:Why Monopoly by shortcipher · · Score: 1

      because its the 75th anniversary of the board game and the launch of the updated version, which you would know if you'd actually visited the site with your eyes open!

    3. Re:Why Monopoly by rca66 · · Score: 1
      Why not Scotland Yard? It's IDEAL to be played in the centre of London!

      London would be perfect indeed. Besides that, here in Germany it has been played in "real life" some years ago in a city, using public transportation means etc.

    4. Re:Why Monopoly by coopex · · Score: 1

      Tried that already. I lost and got 5 years for burglary.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    5. Re:Why Monopoly by TekGoNos · · Score: 1
      Why not Scotland Yard?
      London would be perfect indeed. Besides that, here in Germany it has been played in "real life" some years ago in a city, using public transportation means etc.
      More than once, in more than a city. I personally played it once in Frankfurt. A great way to discover a city.
      Allthough the "game" itself is even harder than the boardgame. If Mr. X doesnt do something stupid (like staying in place for 15 minutes (really happened in another game)), there is no way to catch him.
      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
  38. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if I can get the cabbie to drive past Go, do I get $200?

    No, no you don't. You get to stay in your Momma's
    basement and continue to bitch and moan about the
    state of the world on slashdot.

  39. Is that correct? by ByeLaw · · Score: 1

    The title:

    "London Tuned into Giant Board Game"

    Should that be "London Turned into Giant Board Game"

    1. Re:Is that correct? by Durinthal · · Score: 1

      Well, if everyone was watching a giant board game on their TVs (or listening on radios) it would be correct as-is.

  40. Do people in london by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    really have that much free fucking time on their hands? Here's a hint, good people of Britain: get out of the fucking cab, get off the fucking Dole, and get a fucking job!!

    1. Re:Do people in london by soliptic · · Score: 1
      Insightful?!?

      This is racist garbage and would instantly be at -1 if it was talking about America.

      I'm absolutely disgusted. Pro-US, anti-world bigotry is so common on slashdot, I've had enough of it and really don't think I will be bothered to visit much in future.

  41. A Better Monopoly Game to Play in London by Inda · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've always fancied doing to The London Monopoly Pub Crawl.

    You take the board under one arm and start at the first pub you can find in the Old Kent Road. After a pint you move onto a pub in Whitechapel Road. Pretty standard pub crawl stuff. Maybe a half would have to do though.

    Loads of people have given it a go.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    1. Re:A Better Monopoly Game to Play in London by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      And then you end up in a left luggage locker on Mimas with a passport in the name of Emily Blenkinsop, like I'm going to be trying that again !

    2. Re:A Better Monopoly Game to Play in London by frozen_kangaroo · · Score: 1

      I tried that but blew chunks in "Leicester Square" and had to be taken home. It is a hell of a lot of beer to have to drink! - And it takes ages madly running around in Cabs, busses and on the tube.

  42. Whatever happened to my favourite troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Highly irrelevant here, but I used to be quite fond of all the anonymous trolls that kept posting on slashdot. I'm sure there are still many and they've moved on to other trolling methods, but this guy (whoever he was) always made me laugh:
    #!/bin/sh
    opensource_app=$1
    opensource_p roject=$2
    proprietary_alternative=$2
    application _domain=$3
    SUBJECT="We tried working with ${opensource_app}..."
    COMMENT="We tried working with ${opensource_app}

    An employee suggested to me that we use ${opensource_app} on a few machines here as an evaluation. I was skeptical at first but he explained the benefits of using it for our employee's day-to-day ${application_domain}. So I decided to let him install the ${opensource_app} onto 5 machines to see how the users got on. Besides, our IT manager had been using it on his system and it seemed to work fine, why not try it on the client machines?

    Once he'd got the machines up and running with ${opensource_app} we let the users try it out. It all seemed fine to start with: ${opensource_app} was a pretty good replacement for ${proprietary_alternative} and the users could still do their work as normal.

    Alas it did not stay that way. After a few days, I had lost count of the number of complaints received from users who could find things they were used to or tasks they could not perform that they previously could with ${proprietary_alternative} ${application_domain}. The final straw came when one employee lost several hours work when ${opensource_app} suddenly had an error reading from our intranet file server and corrupted his project.

    Needless to say, ${opensource_project} offered no support whatsoever. I made the employee uninstall ${opensource_app} from the machines and lets just say he's not with us anymore."
    echo $SUBJECT
    echo $COMMENT

    This guy did all sorts of 'insightful' posts with:
    e.g.
    $ ./troll.sh Asterisk 'Asterisk Project' Skype communication

    All the other ones were usually crap and not very clever e.g. 'Netcraft confirms it' but this one really tickled my ribs!
    What've been your favourites?!

    1. Re:Whatever happened to my favourite troll? by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      This one has always been my absolute favorite:

      Fighting the Crack Ban in Fine Restaurants

      How many times has this happened to you? You've just finished a wonderful dinner at your favorite fine dining establishment -- the filet was rare, the port was perfect, and that lemon sorbet? Bliss.

      What could be better? A Crack Aficionado knows. Time to get high, high

      You push back your chair, loosen your tie, and fire up a small chunk of that funky stuff. Ahhh, the good life.

      But then it happens. From nowhere, your formerly friendly waiter swoops in, all aflutter, trotting out that same old story: "I'm sorry, sir, but we do not permit crack smoking in our restaurant." Next thing you know, you've got the maitre d', the sommelier, the owner's silent partners, and fourteen jack-booted thugs in gray SWAT team tacticals swarming all over you, and you're hustled out the door with your jacket over your head.

      Damn.

      Crack Aficionados have always faced discrimination, so it's no surprise that even in five-star restaurants where every hand sports a Dunhill or a Macanudo in that sweet post-prandial afterglow, crack smokers still can't enjoy a smoke without having the heat come down all over them. Trend setters make the old order uncomfortable. It's just the way of the world.

      This sort of unfair treatment is something we all have to deal with sooner or later, but you can be ready when it happens. With our guide to fighting the crack ban, you'll have an answer the next time some monkey in a tux screams, "What the hell are you doing?"

      Assert Your Rights

      When faced with opposition from management, a keen knowledge of history, morality, and our Judeo-Christian traditions can serve you well. Point out that nowhere in the Bible, the Magna Carta, or the Constitution is crack specifically denounced (or even alluded to, as far as our interns can tell. There could be something in Psalms, but the jury is still out.). Sure, there might be a few lines buried in Section 201 of the U.S. Criminal code, but who reads that stuff anyway? We're talking big picture here.

      Argue the Point

      Restaurant-industry workers are people-friendly. They work in a social business. A well-constructed argument can coax out their natural flexibility, tipping the scales in your favor.

      The Socratic Method has stood the test of the centuries. When faced with a hostile waiter, employ this method to solve the problem. In a soft and measured tone, lay out your position, listen carefully to the waiter's response, and then call him a fool. Ask him how many credits he racked up before he dropped out. Crumple up a dollar and fling it in his face. When he turns away to search for the manager, give him a swift boot in the ass to hurry him on his way.

      The Patriotism Card

      Everyone loves America. America is about freedom. After all, this is not Russia. This is not China. This is not the place where the wall came down. Is this not America, the land of the free, and the home of the brave? You're damn right it is.

      You're an American (Unless you're not, in which case here's your first lesson: lie. Always lie). Point out that as a citizen of this country, no one has the right to obstruct your pursuit of happiness, even if your happiness lies inside little rocks from South America.

      Tell them you were in Desert Storm. If you put your butt on the line while liberating that Wal-Mart in Kuwait City to make the world safe for totalitarian theocracy, you'll be damned if anyone is going to tell you how to live your life.

      Point the Finger

      No one likes a tattle-tale, but let's face it: we all do what we have to do. If management is miffed because you're heating up a little cocktail at your table, what about all the cancer-spewing cigarette smokers busily killing everyone all around you?

      What about the guy next to you puffing on a Cubano? That's illegal too, and no one is calling the Feds

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    2. Re:Whatever happened to my favourite troll? by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      I've also always liked this guy:

      http://slashdot.org/~sco$699feetroll

      Don't forget to pay your $699 licensing fee, you coksmoking teabaggers!

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
  43. Yes, "Settlers of Cataan" and "Carcassone"! by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1

    Great games. Easy to learn, great replayability, chance and expertise. It's all good.

    --

    Yay me!

  44. Re:Manchester cabbie was boorish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Relative to Seoul
    Sao Paulo
    Mumbai
    Jakarta
    Karachi
    Moscow
    Istanbul
    Mexico City
    Shanghai
    Tokyo
    New York City
    Bangkok
    Beijing
    and Delhi

  45. Monopoly pub crawl is more fun by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

    As a veteran of three of these, I no longer need a map or a list of pubs. That's a total of 26 drinks, by the way, including the four station bars. It's a LOT easier to do on vodka and orange than on beer.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  46. Aaah London memories by The+OPTiCIAN · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I worked in Central London about twelve months ago. A mate and I had read up on decomissioned tube stations and the like, and thought it would be fun to spend a Saturday going around and trying to find them. This turned out to be not so fun. You pass a siding, see a shadow of something in the darkness, and go "Oh there it is"... and that's it. So this quickly turned into game of "let's see if we can pass through all of the zone 1 tube stations before the tube closes tonight. It was a close run, but we did it. We took a photo at each stop. basically - leap out of the train, *snap*, scuffle awkwardly away from the arms of any nearby security people, leap back on the train before the doors close and on to the next stop! During that day we got seriously yelled at for taking photos of an interesting looking building near Vauxhall Cross. Top day.

    On another weekend I came third in a Mornington Crescent championship.

    And since cab drivers are mentioned in this story, I'll also mention that during my time in London I also got propositioned by a cab driver. It was a company-paid and organised cab as well (!). I explained that while I had every confidence in his a lovely personality, I had a girlfriend back home and it just wouldn't do.

    --


    Believe with me, my saplings.
    1. Re:Aaah London memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During that day we got seriously yelled at for taking photos of an interesting looking building near Vauxhall Cross.

      I think you'll find that Vauxhall Cross is home to the Secret Intelligence Service, also known as MI6, who took up occupancy in 1995. Could be why they were a bit concerned...

    2. Re:Aaah London memories by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sure it's been a while since Hywel Williams' excellent site was last slashdotted, so Underground History - Disused Stations on London's Underground META NAME="KEYWORDS" CONTENT="london underground, ghost stations, history"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Aaah London memories by soliptic · · Score: 1
      During that day we got seriously yelled at for taking photos of an interesting looking building near Vauxhall Cross

      That was probably MI5 HQ (or is it MI6 - can't remember offhand - but either way - I'm not surprised!)

  47. my bet, put your property on wimbledon this week by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 1

    South of the river mate - Nah, can't go down there. You'll never guess who I had in the back of my cab yesterday.....

    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
  48. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL.... you idiot. Lighten up mate.

  49. This sounds like . . . by ndansmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    . . . the delightful real-life board game from New York, PacManhattan.

    1. Re:This sounds like . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is Pacman a board game?

  50. Hear hear!!! by madaxe42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This country is nuts. You get paid more to sit on your fat ass on the sofa all day than you would with a minimum wage job, commuting to work (from 6 miles away!!!!) costs me £4000 a year ($7000) (admittedly 'only' £2000 a year at the moment, but they're doubling the price of a travelcard in november), and the state wants us to pay up to £2 a mile to drive. On top of our 90p/litre ($8/gallon) fuel.

    So... even though the parent is a troll: Here's a hint, good people of Britain: get out of the fucking cab, get off the fucking Dole, and get a fucking job!!

    1. Re:Hear hear!!! by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      That fuel per mile isn't on TOP of the per-litre tax, they'd abolish it.

      That's not to say I agree with it, however...

    2. Re:Hear hear!!! by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Fuel tax is already a much better way of taxing drivers than their new stupid scheme but they are afraid of raising it because of another backlash by truck drivers and farmers etc.

      I simply do not believe that there is any chance at all a new scheme would work out cheaper for the average person, for one it's going to be extremely expensive and that will need to be covered by the revenue generated.

      Also I don't really see how it would help at all, they have said elsewhere that they are not going to build anymore roads, public transport is now all privately owned so there is nothing much they can do with that and if they really wont be getting any more money then how are they going to improve anything any more than they are able to already. It makes no sense whatsoever.

  51. life simulations by conna01 · · Score: 0

    was a game put out a while back that made you a secret agent type character and you could enter fax phone pager email and you would get task and clues? If so, what is the name?

    --
    Acrylic Bubble Panels www.beyond7.com
    1. Re:life simulations by Jaelle+Kitty · · Score: 1

      The game was called Majestic and it was distributed by EA Games -- can't seem to find it on their web site though :-( (http://www.eagames.com/

      Review at GRRLGAMER: http://www.grrlgamer.com/review.php?g=majestic

      --
      In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows or Gates?
  52. You lazy.... by joshsnow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only six miles? You'd better buy a bicycle - and BTW, can you verify your comment about getting "paid more to sit on your fat ass on the sofa all day than you would with a minimum wage job" ?

    1. Re:You lazy.... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Get yourself a couple of kids, council house and your laughing. Certainly enough to pay for your fags and tennants super all day.

      Once the kids are old enough they'll be out on the rob and will be able to finance their own drug and alcohol addictions themselves.

    2. Re:You lazy.... by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

      I do cycle to work - the majority would not, however, and pay through the nose - also, the victoria embankment is hardly pleasant to cycle down every day (Fulham --> City).

      The minimum wage is £4.85 per hour.

      Assuming a 40 hour week, that's 40*4.85*52 per annum - £10,088, or £194 a week. A 40 hour week is a generous assumption - for most shift based work at minimum wage, you'll be lucky to get 25 hours a week - £121.25.

      The department of leisure and entertainment (DOLE) will give you £112.40 a week, minimum. Taken into account the fact that if you're working you're probably paying at least £2 per shift to get there, you'll be better off on the dole.

      Oh yeah, and you don't pay income tax on the dole. On £121.25 a week, you'll only be taking home £94.13 a week post tax. So.. all in all. Yes, it's cheaper to sit on the sofa.

    3. Re:You lazy.... by SeanJones · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah but you wouldn't be sat on the sofa; you'd be driving your unlicensed mini-cab around making a bit of money on the side. Now a version of Hasbro's game that followed mini-cabs would be more interesting: "Your Driver is crawling the kerbs in Streatham muttering 'cab?' at drunken women coming out of a disco" (0 points) "Your driver is attempting a sexual assault" (0 points)" "Your driver is attempting to explain to the police why he has no insurance" (0 points) Sean

    4. Re:You lazy.... by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Don't forget housing! If you are on the dole, the authoritities pay your rent, which can make a huge difference (you would lose a lot of money by taking up a job, if your flat is habitable and the job is not well-paid).

    5. Re:You lazy.... by joshsnow · · Score: 1

      Best laugh I've had all day! Truth is, though, most sane people wouldn't choose a council house just for the sake of "earning" more than the minimum wage. Or would they!? :)

    6. Re:You lazy.... by joshsnow · · Score: 1

      The department of leisure and entertainment (DOLE) will give you £112.40 a week, minimum. Taken into account the fact that if you're working you're probably paying at least £2 per shift to get there, you'll be better off on the dole.

      Thought one had to demonstrate that one was actively looking for work and unable to actually work in order to get a handout from Gordon?

      Sitting on the sofa's probably not an option for most people under those circumstances.

      As for the travel bit, it always cracks me up hearing Londoners complain about their travel options.
      Out here in the sticks, I *have* to use a car to drive to work - usually with coppers hiding in fields and behind trees with speed cameras. The public transport system in London may be breaking down, but at least it exists.

  53. BROADgame?? by B4RSK · · Score: 0

    When I first read the title my mind added an "R" in there. Talk about disappointment when I discovered is was just some bizarre Monopoly publicity stunt! :(

    --
    Some people are like slinkies--basically useless but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
  54. Re:Boring story. Threadjack opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er, well, you've heard the expression "losing your shirt", right...?

  55. I'm sorry I haven't a clue by bullgod · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mornington Cresent, cabbie.

  56. Re:In Soviet Britain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...just when it stops being funny it starts becomming funny again.

  57. Make extra money by requesting an chance or... by Quazion · · Score: 3, Informative

    community chest card by smsing a text to 82222, this i what they try you to do while playing the game, i am telling you its just another get rich quick sceme!

  58. Re:Manchester cabbie was boorish by albyrne5 · · Score: 1

    *yawn* Ok, so there are 14 cities in the entire world more populous than London. However, Seoul only takes up half the area London does, and the point I was making was to do with the previous users comment which seemed to imply London was some kind of quaint village with no need for anyone to take a cab-ride anywhere.

  59. Black cabs in Southfields (wimbledon)? by hnile_jablko · · Score: 1

    The Championship fortnight is the only time of the year a black cab can be see this far south in London. The rest of the year is mini-cabs and quiet little village in SW19 to live.

    1. Re:Black cabs in Southfields (wimbledon)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense, there's quite a few black cabs rolling around Wimbledon each day, and.. village? Wimbledon is a massive bustling town. I'm not so familiar with Southfields, but there's nowhere north of Croydon in London that you could consider to have a village-like atmosphere.

  60. There is only one game to play in London by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    And that is Mornington Crescent.

  61. Grand Theft Auto: Monopoly by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Steal another player's cab and drive it around. (Yes, stealing a data-linked cab with GPS would be stupid. So what? Plenty of stupid crimes every day.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  62. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    The EU fined Hasbro 493 million euros and ordered them to produce a version of the game where the cabs had no seat belts.

  63. No big deal, by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Funny

    You simply stop by Chance and get a "Get out of Jail Free" card.

  64. Re:Boring story. Threadjack opportunity by daikokatana · · Score: 1

    If you're even considering strip-monopoly, you have too much patience...

    --
    http://jcsnippets.atspace.com/ - a collection of Java & C# snippets
  65. to explain by weighn · · Score: 1
    >> Shane Warne [wikipedia.org] is also playing and he has landed on Fleet Street. >> -- >> Everyone's posting at 2. Am I the only Troll without a Karma-Bonus Modifier? >> > Your last 24 posts have cost you four karma points net. Keep this up, and you'll be posting at zero.

    Warney has been in trouble with the media a couple of times -- Fleet St is home to the tabloid press in London...

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    1. Re:to explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was home to.

  66. We tried working with Monopoly... by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

    We tried working with Monopoly

    An employee suggested to me that we use Monopoly on a few machines here as an evaluation. I was skeptical at first but he explained the benefits of using it for our employee's day-to-day gambling. So I decided to let him install the Monopoly onto 5 machines to see how the users got on. Besides, our IT manager had been using it on his system and it seemed to work fine, why not try it on the client machines?

    Once he'd got the machines up and running with Monopoly we let the users try it out. It all seemed fine to start with: Monopoly was a pretty good replacement for Cluedo and the users could still do their work as normal.

    Alas it did not stay that way. After a few days, I had lost count of the number of complaints received from users who could find things they were used to or tasks they could not perform that they previously could with Cluedo gambling. The final straw came when one employee lost several hours work when Monopoly suddenly had an error reading from our intranet file server and corrupted his project.

    Needless to say, Hasbro offered no support whatsoever. I made the employee uninstall Monopoly from the machines and lets just say he's not with us anymore.

    1. Re:We tried working with Monopoly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah! That is teh r0x! Now I've had my laugh ... thanks!
      You might note however that Monopoly is Parker Bothers. Here, use my script again (it's GPL!):

      $ ./troll.sh Monopoly 'Parker Brothers' Cluedo gambling

      Hehehe!

  67. Re:In Soviet Britain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! Some of us don't have fat rolls and body odor!

  68. Re:Boring story. Threadjack opportunity by SharkJumper · · Score: 1

    In college, we invented Trivialopoly by combining Trivial Pursuit and Monopoly. If you wanted to buy a property or place a house or hotel, you had to correctly answer a question from the card drawn.

    I don't think we ever finished a game.

    SharkJumper

  69. Silly Brits by Momoru · · Score: 1

    Oh man you silly brits with your "Cost of Living" Minimum wage, and great welfare benefits. Take a lesson from America and screw over the unemployed and minimum wage earners. One of the largest employers in America (Walmart) pays its employees £2.80 an hour, with no medical or other benefits, and people are lining up for jobs with them.

  70. Screw giant monopoly by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Right now i would be happy if someone could implement a giant sun-blocking shield in London.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  71. Scotland Yard! by Equis · · Score: 1

    Looking at the headline, I was really hoping it was going to be Scotland Yard.

    Now *that* is one of my all-time favorite games growing up and through college. In fact, it's sitting right here in the basement... somewhere...

  72. Cross-over games? by mister_llah · · Score: 1

    Oh man I smell great cross-over games in the making!

    Like Godzilla London Cabbie Monopoly! All we need is a giant lizard to attack London, but basically it works the same way, you place your houses and hotels, and make money in the same way, but if they are destroyed, you can no longer collect rent... oh, and if your cab is destroyed, you lose.

    Quick! Start radiating the seas, I'll start coding!

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
  73. A: because it destroys the flow of a message by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Q: Why is starting a message in the Subject line irritating?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  74. Get out of jail free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in case of need, I always carry a "get out of jail free" card with me.

  75. modernized "scavenger hunt" by peter303 · · Score: 1

    In the old days people used run travel competitions based on "clues", "locations", and "items". These days you can replace the old tools of instruction sheets, maps, and phone calls with GPS, and text-messaging.

  76. Best Time to Play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone considered playing on holidays and weekends when people drink more. More people would catch a cab if they were drunk and didn't want to drive.

  77. Real Life Counter-Strike by JThundley · · Score: 1

    http://realcountertrike.istheshit.net/
    The spelling error is intentional.

    roflmatofl

  78. I'm surprised they missed this side link on-site by DJ+Wipeout · · Score: 1

    I found this while poking around the live site, talk about on-demand publishing! For 100 pounds, you can have a custom-designed monopoly set created and made for you.

    In my mind, that's just as cool as if not cooler than live monopoly (which is only open to UK residents anyway :P )....

  79. In a sad but ironic twist by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

    In a sad but ironic twist, London was demolished and devoured by a pack of hungry, hungry hippos...

  80. MOD UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Mornington Crescent

    LOL - Fantastic.

  81. Londonopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in the states, we have the same problem with people licensing versions of monopoly to suit their particular odd whims. For instance, a lot of towns get their own streets put into a monopoly board and then it gets called "something"-opoly. When playing londonopoly and you get "take a walk on the boardwalk" where do you go?

    1. Re:Londonopoly by os2fan · · Score: 1
      When playing londonopoly and you get "take a walk on the boardwalk" where do you go?

      Advance token to Mayfair (site rental 50$, hotel $2000).

      Seriously, when i look at the commemorative 50 year edition of monopoly, it is exactly the same as i grew up with, except they changed the street names. So mayfair becomes boardwalk.

      --
      OS/2 - because choice is a terrible thing to waste.
  82. Offtopic but pretty song with London placenames... by LouisvilleDebugger · · Score: 1

    ...inspired by the late lamented interurban railways around metro London (I think), a song by Michael Flanders and Donald Swann. (This nostalgic and evocative song made me misty-eyed years before I set foot in England. The rhythm is very slow and pulses like the Slow Train of the title.)