Slashdot Mirror


Study Finds Value in Email Spam

Ant writes "According to a LiveScience story, a steady diet of email spam can be good for you. From the article: 'Researchers split a group of more than 2,100 Canadians into two groups. One group got e-mails that promoted healthy lifestyles, the other got none. "These were informative and motivational messages sent weekly for 12 weeks," explained study leader Ron Plotnikoff of the University of Alberta. The e-mails promoted the benefits of a good diet and physical activity. Those who were effectively spammed, as a group, saw their mean body mass index (BMI) go down, meaning it improved. BMI is a measure of body fat based on height and weight. Overall BMI rose for the control group, which did not get the emails.'"

207 comments

  1. "smapped"? by iostream_dot_h · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is "smapping" an activity that my mother would approve of?

    1. Re:"smapped"? by jx100 · · Score: 1

      Well, considering SMAP is a boy band...

    2. Re:"smapped"? by haakondahl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I live in Japan, and you can NOT get away from the boy-band SMAP. So, it would seem an oddly appropriate typo. Perhaps we should stipulate that AUDIO spam is "SMAP". Different from simple noise pollution, this is audio viral marketing, annoying lodge-in-your-brain-and-fester ad jingles (Yamada Denki, anybody?), and heavy rotation TV and radio promotion of otherwise unplayable music.

      --
      Don't trust anyone under thirty.
    3. Re:"smapped"? by lupin_sansei · · Score: 1

      I here that! I'm also mighty sick of Morning Musume and the Sofmap shop's music.

    4. Re:"smapped"? by MochaMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps we should stipulate that AUDIO spam is "SMAP"

      Second this. Honestly, I think I would rather spend 30 minutes listening to a supermarket "Irrashaimase! Irasshaimase! Reitou shokuhin! Reitou shokuhin!" loop tape than the equivalent amount of SMAP.

      As for Yamada Denki, was just at the Jiyuugaoka store last weekend to pick up a new fan and was reminded why I hadn't been in the last 4 months.

      I hope their pension plan includes therapy and straightjakets for employees who've had to suffer a lifetime of psychotically happy BGM. After even an hour in the store, I have that freaky smurf-like voice shouting "Yama-da den-KI!" in my head over and over.

      Now it's stuck in my head... great :(

    5. Re:"smapped"? by pcgabe · · Score: 1

      (Yamada Denki, anybody?)

      AAAAARGH!

      Now that's going to be stuck in my head all day, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    6. Re:"smapped"? by macshit · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't think that's quite fair -- SMAP may not be the future of music, and they're definitely, er, over-exposed, but they at least seem to be pretty likeable guys.

      That's big difference between Japanese and American "corporate pop" in my mind: Japanese pop stars generally seem more or less normal people if you discount the fact that they're on TV every 57 seconds (I was going to say something about the funny clothing and hairstyles, but come to think of it half the teenagers in Japan dress the same way...); American pop stars are usually mind-bendingly annoying self-obsessed wankers.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    7. Re:"smapped"? by haakondahl · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that you're American, and I have no clue what level of Japanese you speak, but: I suspect that American celebrities sound pretty smart and interesting if English is not your first language. Same for Japanese?

      --
      Don't trust anyone under thirty.
    8. Re:"smapped"? by macshit · · Score: 1

      I didn't say "smart and interesting", just "not wankers". I think the average celeb is actually kind of dim.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    9. Re:"smapped"? by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of that sodding "Crazy Frog".

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    10. Re:"smapped"? by cashman73 · · Score: 1
      Apparently, this, "word," or more appropriately, this mispelling, has been used before. A quick search on urban dictionary reveals three definitions that were entered previously:



      1. Smap refers to the act of spamming an internet forum without the intent to be annoying. Rather it is done for comic relief and to chase away forum trolls.


        The word was first used during a drunken post in the JTS at the famous nforcershq.com.


        Aug. 9, 2004



      2. Sporst Music Assemble People


        Japan`s most successful boy band to date.
        The 5 members are also comedians and actors.


        May 9, 2005



      3. It's the new "snap" - (see "snap" - An expression which expresses expression.)


        Aug. 23, 2004



  2. Study Finds Drinking Alcohol is Healthy by Draconix · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    A glass of red wine a day is good for you.

    --
    By reading this you acknowledge that you have read it.
    1. Re:Study Finds Drinking Alcohol is Healthy by Draconix · · Score: 1

      Well, since I was modded down for being 'off topic', I guess I need to explain that I was (too subtly) noting that stating spam is healthy because spamming health-tips at people made them more healthy is like stating drinking alcohol of any sort is healthy because small amounts of red wine are healthy.

      --
      By reading this you acknowledge that you have read it.
    2. Re:Study Finds Drinking Alcohol is Healthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

      The appropriate way to trick a mod into finding an offtopic comment funny is to start your post with:

      "In other news ... "

  3. So obvious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know what else is good?

    If you have a fat wife or fat children, you should tell them they're fat several times a day. And tell them they need to lose weight. And do it in front of company when people visit. And when they're at the dinner table, tell them they don't need seconds when they reach for something, because they're fat.

    And tell your daughter she's ugly, so she'll do something about her face and maybe get some cosmetic surgery. And tell your son how stupid he is every chance you get so he'll be compelled to be an educated man.

    And really, nothing gets a man to be a better husband and father than constantly reminding him what a pathetic, weak, insecure human being he is. Make sure you point out how he doesn't provide for the family the way some men do and that he has a long way to go before he could ever impress you or the children. Also, if you're an in-law, do this often to your son or daughter in-law. They will thank you for it someday, for making them a better human being.

    And it's proven that little girls who play with (perfect bodied) barbies have much better self-images and are much healthier than other girls. And the images on magazines, MTV, movies and television only help to positively reinforce this good self-image throughout a young girl's growth.

    This also works if you're a manager or employer. Make sure to set aside some time each day to ridicule your employees and point out their failures so that they'll do better. Tell them how lazy, stupid, non-productive and wasteful they are.

    There is nothing more helpful and nothing people are more grateful for than having the obvious pointed out and being constantly reminded for it. And if you look at people today, the most successful and well-rounded and happy adults are always the ones that were told what ugly, fat, stupid, lazy failures they are their entire childhood.

    Too bad this doesn't work for the penis extension thing.

    Oh - and by the way, the study says "These were informative and motivational messages sent weekly for 12 weeks". How is that spam?

    1. Re:So obvious! by tciny · · Score: 5, Funny

      So does this mean that I'm getting all this viagra spam for a reason? Is sombebody trying to motivate me to get better in bed?

    2. Re:So obvious! by Seumas · · Score: 0, Troll

      Shit. Stupid anonymously button :(

    3. Re:So obvious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if this is supposed to be funny or the author of the parent post was trying to be sarcastic, but it does actually work. Ever hear of "you are what you eat"? Try "you are what you hear". Seriously.

    4. Re:So obvious! by Seumas · · Score: 2

      Are you one of those guys who goes around justifying the verbal abuse of your wife and ridiculing her for being ten pounds overweight by saying you're doing it "because I care about her" and because you want to "motivate her"?

      Seriously, that kind of thinking is incredibly 1950s.

    5. Re:So obvious! by delete · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know if this is supposed to be funny or the author of the parent post was trying to be sarcastic, but it does actually work. Ever hear of "you are what you eat"? Try "you are what you hear". Seriously.

      Perhaps some people react positively to criticism by attempting to prove the critic wrong. But for many people, abusing them as you advise will only serve to lower their self-esteem and destroy any motivation they may have. For most of us, support and encouragement from those around us is generally more helpful than discouraging words.

      I seriously hope you don't treat your family or friends in that way, for their sake.

    6. Re:So obvious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why you shouldn't give your email account info to your inflatable doll

    7. Re:So obvious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 funny should be 5 interesting

    8. Re:So obvious! by SySOvErRiDe · · Score: 1

      So does this mean that I'm getting all this viagra spam for a reason? Is sombebody trying to motivate me to get better in bed?

      From the study, your could also say that if you get a steady stream of penis enlargement spam, then your penis should grow!

    9. Re:So obvious! by lightspawn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh - and by the way, the study says "These were informative and motivational messages sent weekly for 12 weeks". How is that spam?

      I'm guessing they didn't opt in, the email headers were forged, they were sent through open relays, and the mails included referral links to sleazy web sites offering related products.

    10. Re:So obvious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about those of us who just laugh and ignore the stupid fucker?

    11. Re:So obvious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell is it a troll for a poster to make a comment that the anonymous comment they accidentally posted was theirs?

      Christ, you idiot moderators...

  4. Obvious by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 1

    It's a reminder, just like attaching a picture of a fat person to the door of your fridge.

  5. Bullshit by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bullshit. Send them a never ending supply of porn and penis enlargement spam and see how many of them are still alive at the end of the study.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    1. Re:Bullshit by varmittang · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder if sending a bunch of porn spam to the wife, might get her to do some of the kinky stuff that gets sent in them? Hmmmmm.

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    2. Re:Bullshit by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Funny
      Send them a never ending supply of porn and penis enlargement spam...
      I could deal with the penis enlargement spam if they were giving me a never ending supply of porn.
    3. Re:Bullshit by dynamo · · Score: 0, Troll

      Mod parent up. I think he has a point.

    4. Re:Bullshit by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      You know, that is a good point.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    5. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...a never ending supply of porn.

      Empornium

    6. Re:Bullshit by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      Send them a never ending supply ... and see how many of them are still alive at the end of the study.

      If it never ends, how do you get to the end?

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    7. Re:Bullshit by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      I wonder if sending a bunch of porn spam to the wife, might get her to do some of the kinky stuff that gets sent in them?

      Since I get tasked with trying to block it, I've seen the kind of spam my wife gets.

      Nope, doesn't work.

  6. What in the hell is... by RobertKozak · · Score: 1

    Those who were effectively smapped, as a group, saw their mean body mass index (BMI) go down, meaning it improved.

    What in the hell is smapped? Is it a statistical term?

    --
    Bet this .sig looks familiar.
  7. Not sure quite what part of this is new by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So they seem to have established that drilling a message home to people through their inbox can sometimes make a point. I really dont know how this is any different to any other repeated advertising/promotion, except that this kind (if sent without the users request) is actually illegal. Surely if someone wants to be reminded all the time about a specific thing, they could just get reminders to flash on the screen, instead of clogging their inbox with these e-mails..

    1. Re:Not sure quite what part of this is new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the people just got so sick of their computers that they decided to go outside and play.

    2. Re:Not sure quite what part of this is new by iamdrscience · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:
      Not sure quite what part of this is new
      The spam part. Yes, the fact that their study used spam is irrelevant to their conclusions, but that's what it is, that's why it's reported upon. Maybe if slashdot were around 20 years ago we'd see a similar story entitled "Study finds value in junk faxes".
    3. Re:Not sure quite what part of this is new by Redwin · · Score: 1

      "Surely if someone wants to be reminded all the time about a specific thing, they could just get reminders to flash on the screen, instead of clogging their inbox with these e-mails.."

      And in the follow up study, one group were given a Windows box infected with spyware to pop up adverts while the other group were given linux..

      --
      Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.
    4. Re:Not sure quite what part of this is new by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Not sure quite what part of this is new
      The spam part.

      Except if you agreed to receive it, it's not spam, just email. All the newsletters, mailing lists and such I subscribe to improve me in various ways, I hope. But it would be just stupid to call them spam, as apparently the PR flack who sent out this press release did when reaching for a hook to make it sound slightly interesting.

  8. Spam + Solicitation != Spam by Endareth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surely spam by definition is unsolicited? If you have a group of people choosing to receive it then it's no longer spam. Whatever the intention and results of this study, linking it to spam is simply wrong.

    --
    Disclaimer: The above comment was made while under the influence of too much coding and not enough sleep.
    1. Re:Spam + Solicitation != Spam by Eugene · · Score: 1

      Another useless study.. people study anything for grant money. the study itself is flawed, since the message they get is not *spam* by definition, and there's not much information on *how* did those people dealing with the *spam*.

      perhaps someone can dig more information on this, but I doubt it'll do us any good except more informed bashing on /.

    2. Re:Spam + Solicitation != Spam by MattyDK23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article doesn't mention, though, if the members of the spam group were aware of the fact that they were receiving the study's spam -- or if the members of the no-spam group were aware they weren't receiving the study's spam.
      Furthermore, could the spam group differentiate between the genuine spam and the study's opt-in spam?
      It's kind of like a blind test. Sure, you probably signed a waiver saying you're willing to receive extra "spam". But you don't know if you're receiving the extra spam or not, and if you are, you're not aware of which emails are the extra spam.

    3. Re:Spam + Solicitation != Spam by squarefish · · Score: 4, Funny

      it's not spam, that's just a typo in the description- see, later in the brief it says 'smapped'. it's smap they're getting, not spam.

      someone needs to smap the editors upside the head...

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    4. Re:Spam + Solicitation != Spam by Endareth · · Score: 1

      "Spam" count = 3 "Smap" count = 1 Which is the typo? :)

      --
      Disclaimer: The above comment was made while under the influence of too much coding and not enough sleep.
    5. Re:Spam + Solicitation != Spam by TheKidWho · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can see how they did it though(note didn't RTFA)

      1. Get a group of 2,100 people together
      2. Tell them you are doing a 3 month survey of their BMI
      3. Choose a random half of the people to send the emails to, don't tell them it's you sending them though.(kind of stupid not to guess who it's coming from though isn't it?)
      4. Collect Data

    6. Re:Spam + Solicitation != Spam by squarefish · · Score: 1

      you can never be certain with /.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    7. Re:Spam + Solicitation != Spam by Quarters · · Score: 1

      It's not in the definition unless it's unsolicited pork-shoulder. SPAM is a canned meat product made by the Hormel Foods Corporation that has entered into folklore. SPAM luncheon meat is also used as an artistic medium in SPAM carving contests.

    8. Re:Spam + Solicitation != Spam by LS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem is that depending on the type and amount of spam the person was already receiving, it could easily be clear that the spam was being received from the researchers. Also, knowing that the study has something to do with spam would cause many of the subjects to purposely read the spam, further making this a less realistic study.

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    9. Re:Spam + Solicitation != Spam by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Besides, have you ever received any "health" spam?

      All I get is spam about illegal drugs or medication, genitalia modifications, unfortunate nigerians, porn or how my bank account details got lost again.

      I also wonder as to the content of these spams; was it health tips or true spam advertising dangerous medication, and why did their BMI go down; because they started using illegally obtained or even banned meds?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    10. Re:Spam + Solicitation != Spam by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      They also don't explain by what method the control group got fatter "overall" during the experiment. They didn't receive the health "smap" before and they didn't receive it after. Why would starting an experiment whose purpose they have no idea of cause them to suddenly get fatter?

      By the way, there's a band in Japan who might object to having their name used to refer to opt-in junk email.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    11. Re:Spam + Solicitation != Spam by Aneurysm · · Score: 1

      You missed two points out... 5. ??? 6. Profit!

  9. But is it all about information? by camperslo · · Score: 1

    Simply spending more time on the computer, whether it be reading spam or Slashdot, is apt to make me forget about the time and be less likely to cook up a large meal.

  10. Subliminal Messages? by cloudofstrife · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait, wait, wait! Based on this study, getting all of the emails for "V1AGRA" and "C1AL1S" will actually improve my libido without actually buying the drugs! Cool!

    1. Re:Subliminal Messages? by initialE · · Score: 1

      Certainly it does nothing for your ability to spell...

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  11. The power of suggestion by ReformedExCon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is not so much the spam itself (though I have to question why they refer to the emails as spam when it seems that they were primarily informational emails), but the constant suggestion to live right and healthily that put the idea into the recipients' heads to do just that.

    It is very similar to the rise in karate school enrollments after a popular martial arts movie like The Karate Kid is released. People take whatever they can from any message and sometimes those messages can lead to action. In this case it was towards weight loss, in others it is towards violence, in others it is towards humanity towards fellow humans.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:The power of suggestion by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm going to start sending a daily suggestion to Rob Malda, suggesting that he jump off a tall bridge. I'll update you in twelve weeks.

  12. MMM Barnyards by bgog · · Score: 1

    Based on the logic of this article. I'll be leaving now to puckup some "Horney Coeds" and take them to a farm for some "Hot barnyard action".

    Spammers don't send reminders to exercise you morons! They try to get you to buy penis enlargment pills.

  13. Not exactly spam by Chatmag · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The emails were informative. I see nowhere in the article that they promoted a product or service.

    If I get an email with no commercial link, or promoting a particular product, its not spam. Spam is UCE, unwanted commercial email.

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    1. Re:Not exactly spam by wcdw · · Score: 0

      BZZZZZT! Thanks for playing, would you like to try again?

      I'd definitely agree that UCE is spam. However, not all spam is UCE. Spam is in the eye of the beholder.

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
    2. Re:Not exactly spam by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

      No, it is not.

      Spam is Unsolicited Commercial Email (UCE) or Unsolicited Bulk Email. As a sysadmin I get some complaints about our own mailing lists - if you signed up to that mailing list, and it's on topic for that mailing list, it's not spam. If you didn't ask for it, implicitly or explicitly, and it's either Bulk or Commercial in nature, it is spam.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    3. Re:Not exactly spam by nsaneinside · · Score: 1

      Very much agreed; perhaps it was smap, then?

    4. Re:Not exactly spam by Arker · · Score: 1

      Uhh no.

      MOST UCE is spam, but not all.

      Spam is UBE - Unsolicited Bulk Email.

      Any email that is not Unsolicited, and/or not Bulk, is not spam. Whether it's commercial or not doesn't matter either way.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    5. Re:Not exactly spam by rogabean · · Score: 1

      Just because it isn't "commercial" doesn't make it not spam.

      "Friends" and their damn "Fwd:" messages are spam to me. If it is email I didn't ask for and do not want, it's spam.

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    6. Re:Not exactly spam by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Unsolicited Bulk Email.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    7. Re:Not exactly spam by LetterJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Spam is in the eye of the beholder."

      The problem with that from the other side is that we've got a large percentage of the population that puts the definition closer to "Email I didn't expect today." Even if they requested it (with double-opt in subscriptions), if they didn't expect it when it arrives (through forgetfullness, etc), they still report it as spam and react as though you sent Viagra ads.

      I've got people who specifically sign up and confirm the subscription to an email course and still threaten legal action over the "spam" when the 3rd installment of the course arrives.

      Leaving the definition "in the eye of the beholder" is far more dangerous than a clear agreed-upon definition.

    8. Re:Not exactly spam by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

      Leaving the definition "in the eye of the beholder" is far more dangerous than a clear agreed-upon definition.


      "Spam is in the eye of the beholder" is trying to point out that there isn't a "clear agreed-upon definition" for spam.

      "excessive unwanted emails" is just as valid a definition for spam as "unsolicited bulk email".

      The real danger IMO is people who try and create the definition instead of trying to discover it.

      -- Should you believe authority without question?
    9. Re:Not exactly spam by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      I never claimed that there *was* a clear agreed-upon definition. However, if we're going to have laws about it, sue over it and threaten physical harm over it, just using whichever one we want is pretty much working out like rational predition would expect: it's not.

      Personally, I don't care *which* definition we use. There are probably hundreds of semantically distinct definitions all with backers and detractors. That's not the point. The point is that, for legal and policy purposes, we need to agree on one. Sure, your Zen approach to spam definition is a wonderful ideal (and is the basis for Bayesian filtering, which I use heavily myself). However, when I have customers or subscribers threatening ever-increasingly-real legal consequences (fines, ISP shutdown, etc), I can't exactly respond to the lawsuit with, "You need to get in touch with your inner spam definition and reach my level of spam enlightenment."

      When my ISP asks me if the claim of spamming has merit, I need to be able to *prove* it wasn't spam or face the consequences. That requires some sort of definition. Emails that will result in ISP shutdown are pretty different under the 2 definitions you listed. Under 1, with no further explanation of "excessive", who knows if I'd be shut down. Under the other, just pointing to the double-opt-in, the "unsolicited" question is answered and the messages are NOT spam, thus resulting in my keeping my ISP account.

    10. Re:Not exactly spam by wcdw · · Score: 1

      I have to admit, I've fielded a few angry e-mails from customers who subscribed to our newsletters, and then somehow thought we had done it as part of some vast conspiracy.

      (Our newsletters are all checkbox-activated, and all default to OFF when creating a new account, though admittedly it's not a double opt-in.)

      That's one reason I started including a "click here to unsubscribe" link on all such newsletters.....

      But who are you to say that that subscription for which I did double opt-in isn't something I consider spam? Maybe the first issue was valuable, and things went downhill from there. Maybe my interests changed. Whatever the case, the message - to me - is still spam. Requested or otherwise, spam is still spam.

      Heck, I once PAID for a subscription to an unnamed financial publication, only to discover the whole thing was spam!

      This is not to say that message senders should be punished for sending such 'requested spam', and the current attempts at spam control are sadly lacking for a sender feedback mechanism in such cases.

      Just to say that it's still spam.....

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
  14. Ahhh by SirSlud · · Score: 5, Funny

    I get it, we just need spammers who encourage us to live healthy lifestyles:

    G_t outside now! Exercise! Stop using y0ur com_uter!

    and shakespear donged a dozen fractal
    nevermind is the people to much building
    for Jill never news to many home funding

    http://wexxx.shasz13.com/fsss/sm11/epl.cgi

    Given that the very purpose of spam is often to sell products that are essentially empty promises, I'm going to write this study off as moot.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  15. What about *negative* spam then? by Misagon · · Score: 1

    Do you think that spam about penis enlargement and weight loss pills will cause a measurable increase in weight and depression?

    I think such a kind of study would be much more interesting.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:What about *negative* spam then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think that spam about penis enlargement and weight loss pills will cause a measurable increase in weight and depression?

      It's an indication of the unfairness of the world that just about the *only* part of the body that putting on weight doesn't make bigger is the penis...

  16. logically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those who were effectively smapped...

    if
    spam = sending people annoying messages

    then
    smap = sending messages to annoying people?

    it stands to reason.

  17. Two ways to look at BMI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My doctor says my weight is just fine, it's my height that is throwing off my BMI. Ideally, I should be close to 9' tall. Where's the spam that makes you taller?

  18. That's not spam at all by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's an opt-in mailing list.
    Are we gonna start calling every computer glitch a virus now, too?

    Also, I bet that if the emails had been advertising actual spam, their bodies would have gotten fatter... and saltier.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:That's not spam at all by B747SP · · Score: 1
      Are we gonna start calling every computer glitch a virus now, too?

      Why not? All the dumb bunnies have been blaming their mistakes on virii for years (as in "I can't find the document I wrote yesterday, it must be a virus").

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    2. Re:That's not spam at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, glitch is just fine. It gets us out of all
      kinds of messes.

      1. Bug = Glitch
      2. Flaw in Software Design = Glitch
      3. Accidentally erased database, and there is no backup = Glitch
      4. 16 Bit number overflowed and caused days of flight delays and cancellations = Glitch
      5. Coffee pot overflowed = Glitch

    3. Re:That's not spam at all by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      No, glitches are "system prompted work break opportunities."

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  19. Valued spam by Krankheit · · Score: 1, Funny

    Spam is an excellent resource. With spam, you can receive valuable money-saving offers on quality products manufactured by reputable companies like Pfizer. Also, spam is a great way for distressed, generous Nigerians to communicate with Americans to facilitate the transfer of their riches to America.

    --
    Powered by caffeine and sugar; BSD
  20. obviously... by andreMA · · Score: 2, Funny
    Those who were effectively smapped, as a group, saw their mean body mass index (BMI) go down
    Yes, throwing your monitor through the window in annoyance over spam is good exercise.
  21. Typical spam by xiaomonkey · · Score: 1

    Hrm....so spam can actually subconsiously effect people and cause them to alter their behavior.

    It seems this is only a "good thing" iff the spam people get encourages a healthy productive life style. If it's for various enlargement pills, web cams, viagra and such, as most real world spam is, it's actually probably a very *bad thing* that people are subconsiously effected by it.

  22. "Healthfood" Spam? by jmanforever · · Score: 1

    ...but I only get spam that wants to pump my septic tank, sell me V1aGr4, or enlarge my pEn1s.

    How can that help my BMI?

    1. Re:"Healthfood" Spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pump your septic tank???

      That's a new one. I don't think I've ever gotten that one before.

  23. How appropriate.. by deacon · · Score: 5, Interesting
    An article about the benefits of spam..

    And I just finished reading the Richard Feynman article on Cargo Cult Science.

    Article Text below as slashdotting prevention:

    Cargo Cult Science

    Richard Feynman

    From a Caltech commencement address given in 1974. Also in Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!

    During the Middle Ages there were all kinds of crazy ideas, such as that a piece of of rhinoceros horn would increase potency. Then a method was discovered for separating the ideas--which was to try one to see if it worked, and if it didn't work, to eliminate it. This method became organized, of course, into science. And it developed very well, so that we are now in the scientific age. It is such a scientific age, in fact, that we have difficulty in understanding how witch doctors could ever have existed, when nothing that they proposed ever really worked--or very little of it did.

    But even today I meet lots of people who sooner or later get me into a conversation about UFO's, or astrology, or some form of mysticism, expanded consciousness, new types of awareness, ESP, and so forth. And I've concluded that it's not a scientific world.

    Most people believe so many wonderful things that I decided to investigate why they did. And what has been referred to as my curiosity for investigation has landed me in a difficulty where I found so much junk that I'm overwhelmed. First I started out by investigating various ideas of mysticism and mystic experiences. I went into isolation tanks and got many hours of hallucinations, so I know something about that. Then I went to Esalen, which is a hotbed of this kind of thought (it's a wonderful place; you should go visit there). Then I became overwhelmed. I didn't realize how MUCH there was.

    At Esalen there are some large baths fed by hot springs situated on a ledge about thirty feet above the ocean. One of my most pleasurable experiences has been to sit in one of those baths and watch the waves crashing onto the rocky slope below, to gaze into the clear blue sky above, and to study a beautiful nude as she quietly appears and settles into the bath with me.

    One time I sat down in a bath where there was a beatiful girl sitting with a guy who didn't seem to know her. Right away I began thinking, "Gee! How am I gonna get started talking to this beautiful nude woman?"

    I'm trying to figure out what to say, when the guy says to her, "I'm, uh, studying massage. Could I practice on you?" "Sure," she says. They get out of the bath and she lies down on a massage table nearby. I think to myself, "What a nifty line! I can never think of anything like that!" He starts to rub her big toe. "I think I feel it," he says. "I feel a kind of dent--is that the pituitary?" I blurt out, "You're a helluva long way from the pituitary, man!" They looked at me, horrified--I had blown my cover--and said, "It's reflexology!" I quickly closed my eyes and appeared to be meditating.

    That's just an example of the kind of things that overwhelm me. I also looked into extrasensory perception, and PSI phenomena, and the latest craze there was Uri Geller, a man who is supposed to be able to bend keys by rubbing them with his finger. So I went to his hotel room, on his invitation, to see a demonstration of both mindreading and bending keys. He didn't do any mindreading that succeeded; nobody can read my mind, I guess. And my boy held a key and Geller rubbed it, and nothing happened. Then he told us it works better under water, and so you can picture all of us standing in the bathroom with the water turned on and the key under it, and him rubbing the key with his finger. Nothing happened. So I was unable to investigate that phenomenon.

    But then I began to think, what else is there that we believe? (And I thought then about the witch doctors, and how easy it would have been to check on them by noticing that nothing really worked.) So I found things that even mor

    1. Re:How appropriate.. by antispam_ben · · Score: 3, Informative

      This livescience.com site looks like the Reader's Digest (disparaging comments intended for livescience, apologies to RD which is sometimes enjoyable and doesn't claim to be a science journal) of science websites. What a horrible article, on several levels. I'll say it one more time: Screw this crap.

      But on to the parent post:

      Cargo Cult Science

      Richard Feynman

      From a Caltech commencement address given in 1974. Also in Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!


      It's been a long time (16+ years) since I read "Surely You're Joking,..." so this was an interesting re-read, especially in light of what I've read since then: Susan Blackmore's "The Adventures of a Parapsychologist," current edition titled "Searching For The Light."

      Blackmore wrote of being the first to get a Master's degree in parapsychology, and what she did along the way to getting it. Her "downfall" was strict adherence to methods Feynman wrote about. She started enthusiastically enough, believing she would be the one to prove the existence of some sort of ESP phenomenon, doing many experiments designed to detect it, but all of them failing. She had colleagues that had successful experiments (showing someething statistically unlikely), but she always found problems and irregularities with their experiments. She was labeled psi-negative.

      What struck me was how these people, even with their motivation to find hard evidence that they thought was "just around the corner," were unable to find it, but they kept on going, because they BELIEVED it was there, in the same sense as a religious believer.

      At the time I had some spurious beliefs brought about by having been around a "good group of people" for a few years. I was already questioning some of these beliefs before I read Blackmore's book, and while reading it my (actually the group's) beliefs fell like a house of cards. I suppose I should be, uh, 'grateful' that I read Blackmore's book.

      Feynman mentions Rhine (click on the parent's "Read the rest of this comment..." link), and Blackmore writes about visiting the USA and meeting him, and she and others had a seance or some such with him. Rhine was defininely the most respected person in parapsychology, making his suggestion of picking only the positive-testing students all the more outrageous.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  24. You can shoot me for this by PigIronBob · · Score: 1

    I know, I know, just couldn't help my self but... This puts Readers Digest in a whole new perspective.

    --
    You never catch me alive
  25. SCREW This! by antispam_ben · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My 1997 Mindspring account gets over 100 spams per day. I go through them at about two per second just so see if someone i know, or something I have actually signed up for, is sending something and hasn't gotten my new address. I used to only read the headers and body to see where to report things, but there's too much for me to report it all now.

    Okay, I acually RTGDFA. Screw this crap!

    Those who were effectively smapped, as a group, saw their mean body mass index (BMI) go down, meaning it improved. BMI is a measure of body fat based on height and weight. Overall BMI rose for the control group, which did not get the emails.

    Spam has been estimated to cost the U.S. economy several billion dollars a year in decreased productivity and anti-spam efforts. Meanwhile, the new study shows that mass email might produce small effects on a case-by-case basis, but it could be effective because of the low cost and large reach, Plotnikoff said.


    "MASS EMAIL" my ass. They don't know the effing difference between solicited and unsolicited emails.

    Screw this crap.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  26. Its penis size slashdot readers are interested in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What effect does penis enlargement spam have on the size of actual penii?

  27. Much spam is de-motivational by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about spam that is very negative: your too small, your credit is bad, you need pills, your account is about to be canceled...

    I wonder if this makes some spam a health threat.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Much spam is de-motivational by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this makes some spam a health threat. :D Are you thinking the same that I'm thinking?

      2. Sue
      3. Profit!!

    2. Re:Much spam is de-motivational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole advertising industry uses that. How on Earth you think your hair is just okay? It is oily or too dry but always with dandruff!

  28. All this 'proves'.... by B747SP · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... is that academics will stoop at nothing in the quest for avoidance of actual work. I work with them day in, day out, and believe you me, I've never seen any group of people work so hard at doing nothing.

    They obtain large government grants on the strength of elaborate proposals that, when passed through a suitably calibrated crap filter, say nothing, then spend the money buying iPods for their kids, and laptops and broadband for their favourite researcher's kid sister. Once the money is gone, they come up with a paper that says "When two houseflies crawl up a wall, it makes no difference to the average vertical speed of either housefly whether his counterpart is standing on his left or his right.", get published in a journal, get a free trip to speak at a conference somewhere, then they go back to square one and start writing up an application for another grant.

    [sarcasm] I can't wait until I've finished my doctorate so I can hop on this gravy train [/sarcasm]

    #disclaimer.not: All examples of corruption in this post are real.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    1. Re:All this 'proves'.... by pcgabe · · Score: 1
      I have a friend who's unemployed--he's collecting unemployment insurance. This guy has never worked so hard in his life as he has to keep this thing going. He's down there every week, waiting on the lines and getting interviewed and making up all theses lies about looking for jobs.

      If they had any idea of the effort and energy that he is expending to avoid work, I'm sure they'd give him a raise.

      I've never seen someone to such a tremendous job, not working.
      --SeinLanguage
      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    2. Re:All this 'proves'.... by B747SP · · Score: 3, Interesting
      This guy has never worked so hard in his life as he has to keep this thing going

      Oh, don't get me started on unemployment benefits! I went down that path for a brief period here in Australia a few years ago. The system here, with all the paperwork and justifications is just painful. They want to know about all your bank accounts and stuff too, so if you have a cent to your name, you're not eligible. Save up enough money to pay for registration on a car so you can improve your chances of getting a job by saying "I have a car and I can use it to get to work" and they'll withold your benefits until you've spent that money on surviving.

      The Australian unemployment benefits system is designed to kick you down and keep you down - once you're at rock bottom, they do eveything they can to prevent you from getting back up.

      It was easier to not eat and live on the street for a while than it was to satisfy those bastards!

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  29. Thats not spam by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

    Thats just daily health and nutrition advice...

  30. Re:who cares by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

    Probably because it goes without saying. =) You were TOO correct with your post. =P

  31. That's backwards. UCE is spam... by msauve · · Score: 1, Insightful

    but spam is not just UCE. Spam is any unsolicited bulk email.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:That's backwards. UCE is spam... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      True. Even a purely informational message would be spam if you sent it to a million people who didn't ask for it.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  32. Once a week? by Snorpus · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the teaser, at least, it sounds like this was one informative email a week, for 12 weeks. Hardly characteristic of the spam that gets (most of us) upset.

    Now what if they sent 5 or 10 a day, every day? Wonder if the test group would be paying attention to the message then.

  33. penis size by geodejo · · Score: 1

    So it's going to get larger and shoot more just from the spam I get! Cool.

    Now to find some one that will appreciate that.

  34. Hmm... by Mr_Icon · · Score: 1

    That would explain why I've been feeling so horny lately...

    --
    If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
  35. Hardly "spam" by Sebby · · Score: 1
    Emails sent to a control group to study effects of a particular message hardly qualifies as "Spam". These email weren't unsolicitated.

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  36. Re:who cares by squarefish · · Score: 1

    that's not really going to help anyone lose weight. ;)

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  37. This is spam? by robogymnast · · Score: 1

    I can't remember the last time that I had spam that contained "informative and motivational messages." Unless you consider viagra ads motivational, that is ;)

    --
    unzip ; strip ; touch ; grep ; find ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; fsck ; umount ; sleep
  38. Bogus Article / Bogus Research by humankind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article isn't about spam. It's a study of the effects of e-mail-based affirmations. It doesn't take a bunch of goofball researchers to demonstrate that daily affirmations are influential, but what does that have to do with spam? Nothing.

    Spam is universally acknowledged as unsolicited, deceptive, indiscriminate, often illegal and immoral solicitations.

    If they want to do a legitimate study on spam, then use spam, NOT uplifting e-mail messages.

    1. Re:Bogus Article / Bogus Research by Jardine · · Score: 1, Funny

      The article isn't about spam. It's a study of the effects of e-mail-based affirmations. It doesn't take a bunch of goofball researchers to demonstrate that daily affirmations are influential, but what does that have to do with spam? Nothing.

      You're Good Enough, You're Smart Enough, and Doggone It, People Like You!

  39. In other news..... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    People that stand next to a fire hydrant on a daily basis are less likely to develop various forms of cancer. Come on. I am not a statistician, but so many "studies" can be done linking things to other things. A bulk of them that actually follow a trend that doesn't make sense probably aren't even directly related, and have something else in the people's lives that links them together.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  40. Sponsors... by holiggan · · Score: 1

    Could you repeat who are the "sponsors" of this "study"?...

    --
    "A sysadmin is a cross between a detective, a police officer, a gardener, a doctor and a fireman"
  41. Wrong by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This proves that messages that tell people about healthy lifestyles can improve people's health. Unless all of the "make big penis now" and "v1agr4 is teh bomb" and "urgent message from Uganda" and the racist crap from spam worms can somehow be considered "promoting a healthy lifestyle". Spam is the stuff we don't want. Messages promoting healthy lifestyles are what you will get if you subscribe to something that you wanted. At that point it's not unsolicited.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  42. Wait... by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

    Are they implying that all the spam I get about enlarging my penis are actually increasing the size of my penis?

    1. Re:Wait... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      If it is, please use your penis to fuck some spammers ass in a few months time...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  43. That's not spam... by KoReE · · Score: 1

    I've never gotten messages with motivational messages in it. They usually accuse me of having a small penis, having an erectile dysfunction, or want me to send money to Nigeria in hopes of getting millions back.

    Spam is not beneficial.

    --
    Instant Karma's gonna get you...
  44. Yeah, and by Council · · Score: 4, Funny

    Getting punched every morning helps with your constitution. Toughens you up. Let's encourage it.

    At least, I think it helps. I'll do some studies.

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    1. Re:Yeah, and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, where can I get some of this healthy spam? The spam I'm getting just gives me callouses.

  45. Hmmm..... by Punboy · · Score: 1

    Is this related in any way to the affect of Subliminal Messaging? While yes, we KNOW we are reading these spam messages, the affect seems to be the same. I haven't RTFA yet, so if im on crack, ignore me.

    --
    If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  46. BMI goes down? by ElGameR · · Score: 1

    I'm so skinny if my BMI goes down at all, I am fairly confident I will die. Is spam going to kill me? This isn't good news at all!

  47. Oh shit! by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nagging works. We have to hide this from the world, especially females. Hell, this is fuckin' bigger than Roswell.

    1. Re:Oh shit! by swiggidy · · Score: 1

      especially females

      They already know nagging works (or at least think they know it works)

  48. BMI by anth · · Score: 2, Interesting
    According to the couple of BMI charts I saw a few years ago I was overweight, so should excercise more and eat less junk food. Yet I was getting a lot of excercise and eating really well, and was in great shape according to any other measurement (well, apart from being short sighted). Now I don't go to the gym anymore and I'm in the healthy BMI range, but wouldn't do nearly so well on the other measurements.

    So part of the blurb could be rewritten:
    ... saw their mean body mass index (BMI) go down, meaning it got worse. BMI is a measure of muscle based on height and weight.
  49. Re:who cares by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    It's redundant with common feeling and thought of (at least) the /. crowd.

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  50. Well, how about other kinds of spam? by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's great. By the same reasoning, I could conclude that merely *receiving* spam that promises me to "3NLAGRE YUR P3N1S!" etc., my penis will indeed grow. Seems far-fetched? It's basically the same claim.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  51. Influence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a steady stream of spam about healthy living is making these people lose weight, I wonder what the spams I'm getting are doing about the size of my dick?

  52. Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is such rubbish. If you want to lower your BMI or get healthy, drag your arse to the gym! But continue to actively block and filter SPAM, as it's better for everyone's health (mental included). :-P

  53. hmm by btnheazy03 · · Score: 0

    This article brought to you by the Gator Company

  54. Spam-motivated exercise program by shanen · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I get lots of exercise jumping up and down and screaming abuse at the spammers. On the morning of a major spam attack I'm liable to lose 5 kg, easy.

    However, I'll bet the study didn't check their blood pressure.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  55. Who the hell cares? I hate it anyway! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah well, aparently beats and brussel sprouts are good for me too; however you won't be soon catching me eating the fuckin things anyways.

  56. But what is the style... by camcorder · · Score: 1

    Did the they use spam obfuscation techniques like 'D0n't e4t fat' or 'You suohd be caaaarreeeful abuot your diet'. Without them I won't call any text as spam, that's like a new World of 'advertisement' communication.

  57. Unfair assumption by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

    The article says their BMI went down, assuming they lost weight, maybe they all just got taller?

  58. porn spam by CSfreakazoid · · Score: 1

    so if I get spam telling me to take viagra and watch porn, will my Body Mass Index go down too?

  59. Sweeet! Bigger penis here i come! by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted a 12 inch cock. And now, i can have one and all i gotta do is kill spam assassin.

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
  60. Absolutely false conclusion by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    This so called study assumes that you actually read the crap in your inbox. Most of us here would not be affected. How many of you even open something from any person or organization you don't know? Straight to the FTC and then the shitcan from my inbox.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  61. Stupid by Klowner · · Score: 1

    If they're right, I should now have a 4'-long and constantly erect wiener, a 50 gallon vat of C!AL!S and V!AGRA, all the FR33 MICROS)FT SOF)TWARE I'll ever need, and be sleeping with hot housewives every evening..

    I call BS on that study.

  62. lower BMI not always a good thing by The_Wilschon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There do exist people in the world (myself being one of them) who have the opposite problem from "The Average American"... I cannot keep enough weight on to stay healthy... If my BMI were to go down, then I probably wouldn't have enough reserve fat to survive from one meal to the next. And before anyone says "Boy I wish I had your problem", no you don't. Trust me. Being constantly on the edge of dangerously underweight is not fun, healthy, good for one's social life, etc. etc. etc. It is a less common problem, but it is no less of a problem. In fact, I dare say that in many poor third world countries, being overweight would be looked on just as being underweight is here.

    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
    1. Re:lower BMI not always a good thing by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Actually BMI does not equate to your weight. A person's BMI can go down while he gain weight, this could occur when the body's muscle mass increase. But I do see your point, it just that in this case, most people in Canada and USA inclusive (not going to check other countries) have higher then normal BMI, so lower BMI is good for the majority of the cases.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:lower BMI not always a good thing by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      True. It is really just a minor pet peeve for me, so I spouted off.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    3. Re:lower BMI not always a good thing by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      Actually BMI does not equate to your weight.

      All definitions of body mass index I have seen are BMI equals mass (in kg) over (height (in m) squared). So technically, I agree here ;-)

      A person's BMI can go down while he gain weight

      Not unless he also increases in height. (Or is in a higher gravity field, since mass is the key element here. ;-) There are other measures to look at for body fat/overweight/so on. BMI is a fairly simplistic measure.

      The real topic of this post: My take on this study was that people are so stressed from spam that they stop eating and lose weight.

      My apologies to the original poster, if this seems somewhat insensitive. Underweight is a health problem. See last month's SciAm as an example.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  63. Mailing lists by JPortal · · Score: 1

    Or, instead of hoping to get spam, you can sign up for a health mailing list.

  64. sweet! by Daktaklakpak · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm gonna go measure my penis now...maybe it's been getting longer!

  65. So... by phenopticon · · Score: 1

    this proves spam is more harmful? Since the 10+ I get each day tend not to be helpful proactive life solutions but instead viagra, gambling and porn ads.

    Hmm... maybe it is helpful.

  66. Pressing "Delete" burns fat! by erroneus · · Score: 4, Funny

    As it turns out, a re-examination of the study reveals that the subjects burned on avarage of 2,000 calories a day by pressing "delete" on all of these messages. In addition to the extra exercise, they were also consuming more time away from food since they were spending all of this time deleting emails. Finally, many subject becames so frustrated with their email that they took up other hobbies and found themselves actually going outside seeking something to do.

    1. Re:Pressing "Delete" burns fat! by ahiro · · Score: 1

      http://www.pro-games.net/cm/36-20050704.png
      This was average account. It wasn't used for 2 years, if not longer, wonder how much spam it got..
      Wonder how much fat you burn with browsing all those mails...
      Wonder how much frustration you receive...

  67. Don't waste your time RTFA by aztektum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Basically it says that the Jedi Mind Trick may work if you are persistent in application.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
    1. Re:Don't waste your time RTFA by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      Move along now. This is not the smap you're looking for!

  68. Real Reason they lost weight? by Israfels · · Score: 1

    I think the real reason they all lsot weight was because of the calories they burned deleting all the extra spam. On a side note in order for them to lose weight from the instructional emails they'd first have to follow it's instructions. Last time I checked, following the instructions in spam was bad. VERY bad. If it's not then I'll just update my credit card number at this website, order some herbal penis enlarger and check out that free ipod deal.

  69. Or, Deleting Spam burns more calories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It takes physical effort (in terms of mousing and mouse clicks) to delete a spam message.

  70. Increase your Size!! by mindbomb33 · · Score: 1

    If this is true . . . Considering I receive 10 "size and girth" e-mails a day, my wang should be 28" by now . . .

    --






    --
    "You've only got one finger left,
    and it's pointing at the door."
  71. Man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit spamming the comments section!

  72. i wonder... by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    if they take those same test subjects and send half of them with emails talking about getting a longer penis and half of them with nothing, would you find 12 weeks later that the ones receiving emails with longer penis to grow an inch or 2 or even more? /. readers, DONT TRY THIS AT HOME! this study hasn't proven to be safe! you never know what may happen. maybe receiving longer penis emails may actually have the reverse effect and *shivers* 'shrivel' it up!!!

  73. Open, Shut Case by Hosiah · · Score: 1

    Don't even try to tell me that Microsoft and AOL didn't partner to fund this study.

  74. And none of them were running SPAM filters! by betasam · · Score: 1

    Had I received this mail, I'm sure my dual combo of Bogofilter and SpamAssassin (call that paranoid), would've done their job. My BMI would've remained the same. Installing SPAM filters would've just about ended all this "scientific" [duh?] research. Remember the times when advertisers put in motivational messages every 24 frames in TV ads and it was "statistically" (and subconsciously) supposed to work. What about studying Stress and Loss of Productivity resulting from Spam? (spending time deleting all those mails without a filter.) I hope no one comes up with a study saying that'd be a nice stress buster.

    --
    No Greater Friend, No Greater Enemy! (Lucius Cornelius Sulla)
  75. Re:So obvious! - i'd say by ZeroZen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Holy missed the joke there. Did you read everything he said? At the bottom he concludes and it's obviously a joke.

  76. SO stoopid by lucason · · Score: 1

    Partcipant of the study agreeing to get spam... Is this not obviously a contradiction in terms?

  77. Nah.... by mjensen · · Score: 1

    The people who got spam probably got annoyed at getting spam, increasing their heart rate, and burning more energy.

    That, or the exercise of clicking "Delete"

  78. BMI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BMI is a measure of body fat based on height and weight.

    No it isn't. How could it be? BMI is a measure that is basically a weight-to-height ratio. The problem with this is, ANY weight shows up the same - fat or muscle, it doesn't matter. Thus, the people who are in the best shape - that is, athletic people with muscular bodies - show up just the same in terms of BMI as people carrying extra fat.

    This is known. It's been known for years. Everyone who knows about this subject knows that weight-to-height ratios are very misleading. So why are they STILL used? It's very hard for me to understand.

  79. Bullshite by dacarr · · Score: 1

    They asked for this, ergo it's not spam. Besides, most of the spam I get isn't promoting healthy lifestyles, it's promoting erectile-dysfunction drugs, pornography, and money-making schemes, primarily the Nigerian 419 variety. Never mind the viruses and the chain letters I get from my mom.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  80. Hot Dang!! by Gribflex · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna turn all my spam filters off right this second! If I read enough of those emails, I'll get rich quick, AND get a bigger wang.

    I could do with out the steamy hot horse sex though, I hope I don't have to take the good with the bad.

  81. Re:who cares by tonsofpcs · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well if sending messages about getting thinner gets them thinner, does that mean that the penis and breast enlargement emails will make me fully endowed in both regions?

  82. Intelligent people aren't susceptible by Eunuch · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's very well known that the more intelligent you are, the less you are moved by the typical "lowest common denominator ad". Many of these types of people find slashdot (not through an ad mind you!) and post here. Not saying they are "better" in any way, but that's how it is.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
  83. Burn those calories!!! by jamesh · · Score: 1

    If I come into the office in the morning and there is a mixture of spam and ham in my inbox, it pisses me off. Getting pissed off is a sure fire way to burn calories (heart rate rises, etc), although probably not so good for you in other ways.

    It works better for me because i'm the one who maintains the company spam filter, so if spam is getting through then i'm the one who'll be doing the tuning.

    Not that i've had to do any tuning in a while though, i get the odd week where some new trick means that some spam is evading the filters, but then the system learns and it stops.

  84. Control group? by brian0918 · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't the control group's BMI remain relatively unchanged? or are they all just Americans?

  85. HUH? This is spam? by sjs132 · · Score: 1

    "These were informative and motivational messages sent weekly for 12 weeks,"

    I don't get it... This isn't the type of spam I get... the problem is that someone wanted money to justify their existance at doing their job, so they came up with this lame study... got a grant for it, and it was probibly from the government...

    1) Go to college for life
    2) Think of things to study
    3) Fill out Grant applications like mad
    4) Profit!


    I think there was supposed to be a "?????" for #3, but why question the obvious!

    If I were John Stossel, this is where I would say "Give me a Break!"

    --
    --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
  86. Who funds this crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So no spam makes you fat? Why did the control group put weight on? Are ALL Candians just getting fatter and fatter every 3 months? Get real...

    And so of course we should all have raging erections all the time and cheap software... Not to mention being extremely rich cause all those nice Nigerian bankers are giving away all that money...

  87. On Other News... by Jose-S · · Score: 1

    Scientists found that reading Slashdot all day actually makes you more productive. Go figure.

    1. Re:On Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientists found that reading Slashdot all day actually makes you more productive. Go figure.

      With the projects I've "contributed" to, I have no doubt this is true.

  88. Ah /. cynicism by Eunuch · · Score: 1

    Libertarian, eh?

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
    1. Re:Ah /. cynicism by sjs132 · · Score: 1

      No, American... I wouldn't have anything to do with Libia.. ;)

      --
      --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
  89. Value? by azav · · Score: 1

    These people need to die.

    There is no value in spam, the only value is in obliterating the people who send it.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  90. Healthy Reminders by Painless+Parker · · Score: 1

    There are many studies showing that doctors who continually remind patients to avoid negative health activity, like smoking, eating bacon and eggs, tailgaiting, or risky sex, have healthier patients than those who don't. As Samuel Johnosn said: "It is insufficiently considered that men more often require to be reminded than informed." So it seems that anyone in a perceived position of authority sending repetitive emails can obtain similar results, at a fraction of the cost of doctors' visits. Just don't expect an overall reduction in health care expenditures, since healthier patients live longer, and people who live longer cost the health system more.

  91. This is great! We need pushback against the fats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The fat lobby has been fighting fitness ads. We need some serious pushback like this.

    Obesity has reached the point that hospitals are putting in lifting gear previously seen only in equine hospitals.

  92. bad study by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    Based upon the abstract (I only skimmed the article), I think there's sufficent evidence to throw out the survey: the control group's BMI INCREASED.

    The control group should remain the same. Based upon the result of the control group increasing, we can conclude that the population should be continuously be getting fatter and fatter ad infinitum.

    The article also failed to mention if the test was double-blinded and such. It fails to mention if the spam was designed to be attractive, or even unsolicited at all. In order for the survey to be valid, it would actually HAVE to be unsolicited, as people subscribing to such an email would naturally tend to be watching their diet more closely than those not subscribing. Additionally, participants that actually READ the messages are more likely to respond to a survey.

    Sorry, but these are junk-statistics. Calling crap like this 'science' makes me sick.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  93. Of course they lost weight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people in the "spammed" group obviously got tired of cleaning up their inboxes and went outside instead, had a walk, played frisbee golf ..

  94. Study finds value in mailing lists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would be a more appropriate title.

  95. Re:So obvious! - i'd say by Mornelithe · · Score: 1

    And you missed one level of replies, in which the person below the original, long post seriously advocates doing what the person in the original is jokingly suggesting.

    --

    I've come for the woman, and your head.

  96. BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a son of a nuclear physicist and an electron scanning microscope specialist, I disagree. My father, the physicist, receives half a million dollars in grants every 3 years. He has never used any of this money in any unethical way. For example, the printer we have at home is an old B&W printer that jams alot. My little brother is in high school and would love a better printer to print his reports and presentations out on. My father will NOT buy a new one using the grant money, because for his purposes, there is no need for a better printer. All the desktops in the house are paid for out of our own pockets. He has his laptop (about 3 years old) and sees no need to use the government's money on something that he does not NEED.

    You may have dealt with some unethical researchers but please don't claim that all academics are the same. One of the most important things my dad does with the grant money is hire post-docs.

  97. In another news ... by ScorpFromHell · · Score: 1

    the control group members' members were found to be shirinking, whereas the other group, which did not receive the informative mails about member enlargement, had their members' members maintain the same size.

    --
    -- Prem
    Aiming to tweet on a rice ... help me find the write pen!
  98. Filter by SMitra72 · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't my junk mail filter just eat this stuff?

  99. Yet Another Breakthough.... by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    ... all the way from 1924.

    They knew they were involved. They know they were being monitored. They were participating in yet another replication of the Hawthorne studies http://www.mtsu.edu/~pmccarth/io_hist.htm (halfway down).

    All they needed to know was someone was watching (they signed consent forms) and be told what to do (they received emails).

    Now, redesign it in the form of Stanley Milgram's Harvard experiments (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment) and have the emails say "Locate the spammer that sent this, and remove any one of their major organs through any existing orifice", and you've got my interest.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  100. Okay, when the realworld implication happens? by JollyFinn · · Score: 1

    When does my penis get enlarged ?
    After all lots of spam I get suggest that.

    --
    Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
  101. Space Ring Could Shade Earth and Stop Global Warmi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now this from the same source of credible and informative articles.

  102. Am I sensing... by Hattmannen · · Score: 1

    Another BMI discussion coming up? I'd really like to hear all about how wrong it is one more time, so I could log it all this time... Oh wait.... I was wrong. Go about your business. There's nothing here to see.

    --
    People are not wearing enough hats.
  103. BMI doesn't measure body fat by taustin · · Score: 4, Informative

    BMI is a ratio of height to weight. It is no, in any way, connected to body fat. That is what makes it pure, unadulterated bullshit. It does not take in to account age, build, or even sex. According to those who preach BMI, a man and a woman of the same height should be the same weight. According to BMI, if you are very muscular, but in such good shape you have 5% body fat, you are overweight.

    That isn't just quackery, it's medically dangerous.

  104. sNapped, as in "Went Berserk" by billstewart · · Score: 1
    A good berserker rage can lose you a few pounds, and it has the benefit of killing off the people who are sending out this annoying junk. It's one thing to have positive-mental-attitude saccharin sent to you once. A steady diet of it can cause lots of collateral damage, unless you go stop it at the source. There are people who like that sort of thing, and there's a "Successories" catalog just for them. Then there's the rest of us.

    A decade ago the company I was working for started putting out lots of happy happy joy joy stuff about taking responsibility for your own career management and managing change, and recycling Clintonesque rhetoric about "Change is Good". Half my department got laid off a couple of months later, by the same happy happy joy joy PR people. A couple of years later, my next company's PR people started putting out 3-inch-diameter buttons saying "We're Navigating Change" with a ship picture in the background, and matching mouse pads and note paper and friendly brochures about how change can be stressful but we can be highly effective people if we manage it well and drink the company Kool-Aid. The layoff that time was only about 10%, not including me. A couple of months later my pen leaked in my pocket, and I decided that I'd rather wear the stupid button and cover the ink spot during the meeting I was having that afternoon, so it had some use...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  105. Er... they're all above 30 now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And all but one of them is unmarried.

    The reason they're still around is because they typifies the average men:
    1) tsuyoshi --- buddy
    2) shinogo --- clown
    3) kimutaku --- asshole
    4) who?

    1. Re:Er... they're all above 30 now... by haakondahl · · Score: 1

      None of which is why I listen to music. I realize that a lot of people like their soap opera or "terebi dorama" mixed with their music, but I do not. IMHO, all that crap is useful for is to sell records when the music won't. I watch FujiTerebi for my drama, and I buy CDs for my music, and I CAN'T STAND being bombarded with crap noises intended to make me buy something through sheer "unforgettability", which is not nearly the same thing as memorability. Watching the sun rise from atop Fuji-San is memorable, whereas the God-Damned Yamada Denki tune is merely unforgettable.

      If these guys need to "typify" something, then by all means, they should do it. I wish them good luck, and all that. But DO IT THROUGH THE MUSIC.

      And I don't care much for their style of music, anyway. Fine, that's just my opinion. But you can see why I get tired of them very quickly. They're not my friends, and I don't want their advice on TV telling me what to buy.

      That's a certain kind of SPAM, which I say we should call SMAP.

      --
      Don't trust anyone under thirty.
    2. Re:Er... they're all above 30 now... by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1
      The reason they're still around is because they typifies the average men:
      1) tsuyoshi --- buddy
      2) shinogo --- clown
      3) kimutaku --- asshole
      4) who?

      At a guess:

      4) Profit!

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
  106. It would help, except people don't read SPAM by FurahiVSZuri · · Score: 1

    If those people were a study group then no wonder they read their SPAM, they probably knew it was from the thing that they were /paid/ to do, so they must've read it because they thought they wouldnt be paid otherwise, or simply because they felt bad to take their money and not read their emails.
    Normal SPAM isn't usually read, it's just discarded, so... :P

  107. Do they read ALL their spam? by kryten · · Score: 1

    I never would have seen these 'motivational spam' messages. They all would have ended up in my spam bin.

    It's just the old "If a tree falls in a forest.." question again.

  108. Lower BMI is better? by hovercraftSpareWheel · · Score: 0

    saw their mean body mass index (BMI) go down, meaning it improved

    Or possibly that the previously healthy subjects turned anorexic.

    More seriously, there was an interesting article in the June issue of Scientific American questioning whether the alleged health hazards of being overweight have been severely exaggerated. They certainly don't appear to be as great as the risks associated with being underweight (not that that's a worry for me).

    Eat, drink and be merry ... it'll take your mind off all the depressing news.

  109. Poor assumptions by CarrotLord · · Score: 1

    Just because their BMI went down, doesn't mean they lost weight. They could have grown.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
  110. Re:So obvious! (But not to the modders) by lcsjk · · Score: 1
    Come on people! This person is not being funny! He is being sarcastic. It has been proven that constant bombardment about a person's weaknesses does not have the opposite effect. Always being told you are no good makes you stop trying to be better. Even animals respond to praise better than they respond to kicks and beatings.

    Just adding one funny line at the bottom does not make the whole paragraph funny!

  111. Fishy... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    I don't have the hard facts, but this smells a bit of industry-backed propaganda.

    I'm JUST saying.

  112. Weight loss by DrLex · · Score: 1

    Of course the people who were spammed lost weight. They were simply more stressed, reducing their appetite, and had to use more muscles to hit their delete buttons and bang their frustrated heads against their monitors!

  113. Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The spammed ones got pissed at their PCs and went outside, while the control group sat around emailing friends and families.

    It could happen

  114. sure it's good for you by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Keep opening and reading spamcrap, and eventually your computer will be so totally locked down as a zombie/virus nexus that your system will lock up, your ISP will cancel your account, and all of the people you have in your email addressbook will hate you and never talk to you again (nor ever open your emails).

    Eventually, you'll HAVE to go outside in the sunlight and get some fresh air, if only to go buy a new computer system.

    = better health!

    --
    -Styopa
  115. of course it is! by whitroth · · Score: 1

    I'll get my penis and breasts enlarged, cum longer, have a lower mortgage, and all the pr0n I ever wanted, and I'll have US $25M in my bank account for that poor person in Nigeria.

    I also won't spend as much time online, since my machine will be so protected by the protection the software that the spam told me about that I won't be able to use it.

    And, of course, I won't have all the weight of that excess money, having invested in all those penny stocks whose value went from pennies to mils (thousandth of a dollar).

    See? Way better life.

    mark

  116. You've never heard of by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 0

    You've never heard of the SPAM diet?

    --
    Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

    http://financialpetition.org/
  117. BMI does NOT measure body fat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's based solely on height and weight and doesn't care if you have 200 pounds of muscle or 200 pounds of fat.

    I'm quite healthy and my BMI is pretty close to the "obese" category.

  118. No i'm not loosing weight! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    I'm gaining it because I have to sit all day at the computer complaining about all the spam!

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  119. Propaganda Tool... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    This study only proves that spam is an incredibly effective propaganda tool.

    As such it is too dangerous to leave in the hands of the public...

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  120. Difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real reason they lost weight could be that they was busy reading the spam and didnt have time to goto the kitchen. :D

    Also there is a difference between informative mail that encourages healthy lifestyle and mail that says "CLICK HERE!!!", "YOU WON 1 MIL IN CASINO CLICK HERE TO GET YOUR MONEY!", "ENLARGE YOUR PENIS!", "SEND MONEY HERE TO GET YOUR HIGHSCOOL DIPLOMA", "BUY THIS AND LOOSE WEIGHT", etc...

  121. Re:Bullsh*t by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't complain too loud, the microphones the CIA planted in your shoelaces might pick it up...

    --
    My sig can beat up your sig.