Slashdot Mirror
New MRI Technique Can Detect Diabetes
MonkeyBoy writes "Researchers at Joslin Diabetes Center and Massachusetts General Hospital have unveiled a new magnetic nanoparticle based magnetic resonance imaging technique that can detect diabetes even before clinical symptoms. In mice they were able to take non-invasive images of pancreatic inflammation and its reversal for type 1 diabetes. Full article is available as a PDF from Pubmedcentral. Will we see rapid translation of these pre-clinical observations to prediction and/or stratification of type 1 diabetes and treatment of individuals with the disease? This would provide a crucially needed early predictor of response to therapy. As an added bonus it looks like the analysis was done on a Linux box too."
Sweet!
Sure.. MRI should be able to scare away diabetes with the ridiculous sounds it makes..Gosh why did no one think of this before?
Explore your creative side
Yay! Now they can detect my Mountain Dew drinking habits and force me to go cold turkey even when I'm still in denial!
This once again proves that the OS is unimportant, and only the application matters. Who cares what OS was used to run the program that allowed this development? Certainly not the patients that benefit from it.
http://www.residentcynic.net/
That's fantastic, but it's going to take a lot of persuasion to get me to go near an MRI willingly after seeing its effect on nearby hospital equipment. You're only as safe as the stupidest person in the room.
Just reading the summary, it says the box might run on Linux?
This is a good thing, now if only the pharmaceutical companies would make alot of their stuff open to the public, maybe we'd all not suffer nearly as badly due to our wallets not being fat enough.
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
This doesn't belong on Slashdot.
Of course it does. Given the sedentary lifestyle of many Slashdotters, it concerns them most directly.
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
I was just at a meeting at a meeting at a major healthcare company, and number two on the list of priorities for the next 3 years was diabetes detection/prevention. The budget was in the billions.
These guys will be making a LOT of money.
This is an interesting application of magneto-immunoassay - using the change in magnetic properties to determine if there has been a reaction.
Erm, they're talking about detecting TYPE I diabetes. Not caused by a sedentary lifestyle, but an autoimmune disease.
I am posting instead of replying b/c there are already several separate posts that have it wrong. Gasp and shock, I know.
Type I diabetes is NOT associated with diet.
This article refers to an autoimmune disease, not a lifestyle induced one.
Ignorance is not a crime; neither should it be a way of life
Congress control $ = inmates run the asylum
Type II isn't caused by a sedintary lifestyle either. I was living an active life, getting lots of exercise when I developed it. I would regularly go out to a mall to walk, not caring that I didn't buy anything, just for the exercise, and I kept that up for the first several years after I was diagnosed. I'm not as active now, but that's because my health isn't good enough right now, and I miss the exercise.
Good, inexpensive web hosting
J Clin Invest. 2005 Aug 18; [Epub ahead of print] Related Articles, Links
Noninvasive imaging of pancreatic inflammation and its reversal in type 1 diabetes.
Turvey SE, Swart E, Denis MC, Mahmood U, Benoist C, Weissleder R, Mathis D.
Section on Immunology and Immunogenetics, Joslin Diabetes Center, and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
A major stumbling block for research on and treatment of type 1 diabetes is the inability to directly, but noninvasively, visualize the lymphocytic/inflammatory lesions in the pancreatic islets. One potential approach to surmounting this impediment is to exploit MRI of magnetic nanoparticles (MNP) to visualize changes in the microvasculature that invariably accompany inflammation. MNP-MRI did indeed detect vascular leakage in association with insulitis in murine models of type 1 diabetes, permitting noninvasive visualization of the inflammatory lesions in vivo in real time. We demonstrate, in proof-of-principle experiments, that this strategy allows one to predict, within 3 days of completing treatment with an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, which NOD mice with recent-onset diabetes are responding to therapy and may eventually be cured. Importantly, an essentially identical MNP-MRI strategy has previously been used with great success to image lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients. This success strongly argues for rapid translation of these preclinical observations to prediction and/or stratification of type 1 diabetes and treatment of individuals with the disease; this would provide a crucially needed early predictor of response to therapy.
To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
I have heard from several people that have had an MRI that (a) it is almost impossible to get scheduled in any reasonable timeframe for one and (b) they are 'incredibly expensive'.
:)
For something like diabetes that can be diagnosed in other ways, I don't see a normal doctor or health insurance company prescribing an MRI. Health care is one of the areas where capitalism is really the wrong motivation (because our long term health is not their concern - just short term costs).
I guess I'm just cynical, but I see some of these great advances being almost useless to the majority of people because they simply can't afford it or don't even have healthcare.
I keep hoping for things to change though
This is quite the breakthrough, and these things seem to happen out of technology we already have but just haven't used it in the right way. Personally, I'd settle for a cure for cancer being found on a Windows box if it meant saving lives. :(
Perhaps this wonderful new technology will be used by insurance companies to deny your child insurance before the diabetes could possibly cut into their profit margins?
Sorry. There should be a "cynic" moderation.
fifth sigma, inc.
Another good reason to not take medical advice from Slashdot. They're talking about type 1, not type 2. Type 1 is caused by the immune system. It's closer to MS than it is to type 2. As a parent of a type 1 diabetic, it's hard to not take the misinformation too seriously when I see that my 5 year old faces a future of seizures (from too low blood sugar) or blindness, amputation, kidney failure, and painful neuropathies (from high blood sugar). I know you're just passing on your wisdom, but it would be nice if you had bothered to know what you were talking about first.
And about saving the taxpayers money, well they are close to a cure for type 1, but since it's underfunded and the stem cell issues it will take far longer than it should. So, you're paying for type 1 treatment right now -- I have to stab my boy's fingers about 15 times a day - those strips are a buck each. Not to mention the 6K pump, hundreds of dollars in consumables for the pump every month, and the much more likely frequent hospital visits.
So, I say pay now or pay later. For the kids with type 1, they'd appreciate it as a taxpayer if you'd invest a little now to save a lot of money for later.
The way I do it, it does. I go around every level, not stopping to rest if I can help it, and quickly. Also, at that time I was working up two flights. At fifty, I'd go up and down the stairs and watch kids half my age take the elevator and not get there any quicker. As far as the ad homenem comments at the end, they reflect more on you than on me, and show why you're posting as AC. Never did the word "coward" fit so well.
Good, inexpensive web hosting
That first link is complete quackery. There is NO TREATMENT for Type I diabetes except insulin, PERIOD. I'm a diabetic, I know this.
/. deserves everything that happens to them.
There's plenty of treatments for Type I diabetes, providing you don't mind ketoacidosis, hyperglycemia, impotence, blindness and all the other fun side-effects.
Mind you, anyone that takes health advice from
I spent several years as the "seeing eye person" for a Type I who'd not taken care of himself and saw what it could do. Maybe that's why I'm so rigid on controling my blood sugar that it tends to get too low.
Good, inexpensive web hosting
I've been through it a few times, and didn't mind it a bit. Of course, I'm not at all claustrophobic. Are you, by any chance? If so, I can imagine how bad it would be, and sympathise with you.
Good, inexpensive web hosting
Is impossible to get independently. But there are laws (at least in the US) that say that you cannot be turned down for a group plan (ie, your employer's) because of your illness. It's pretty much the only way a diabetic can have insurance.
I know I shouldn't feed the troll, but I will say that my doctor considered me to be in good health and getting enough exercise. That's because the mall-walking was only one aspect. I love to walk and never drive anyplace if it's within my walking distance. For me, if it's less than about two miles one way, it's close enough to walk. How far are you willing to walk? Fifty feet?
Good, inexpensive web hosting
Back in college I had an Amiga 500 that I loved hacking on (dating myself here), but a guy I knew was not only really into the Amiga, he had to work it into practically every sentence. He'd raise his hand in Compsci classes and brag about how "My Amiga can do that better" and "That's so much easier on My Amiga". Even I grew sick of hearing the word "Amiga". He earned the derisive nickname "Amiga Man".
Apparently he's now "Linux Man"and works for Slashdot.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Check these sites, how to prevent and reverse it The above are almost laughable, laughable if some people, too many people didnt actually believe it. Diabetes is not a conspiracy to sell drugs, just a really bad disease. Think about it just for a second, insurance companies pay out millions every year in treating the symptoms of diabetes, you think they are not desparate for a cure? I am a type 1 diabetic have been for 25+ years since i was 3 years old. For my own education i have spent countless hours finding out about the disease. Treatmented with vitamins, i mean really? Vitamins are an order of magnitude or more cheaper than insulins, if it worked you would think it would be a fairly common treatment by now.... - Robert
As a doctor, I had a few observations about this
... how often would
stusdy. These researchers demonstrated that an
MRI can find evidence of diabetes in mice before
the development of clinical symptoms. How does
this relate to people?
1. Practical: Type I diabetes typically develops in
children, who usually must be sedated and
observed for an MRI. This could double the cost
of the MRI (typically $1-2k in US). Also, we
don't know how long these findings are present
before diabetes develops
this need to be done?
2. The Incidence of type I diabetes is about
0.4% among people without relatives with
type I. First degree relatives have a 5-30%
risk... Certain genes predispose to type I
diabetes.... maybe this could be used in certain
people.
3. Since there is no such early diagnosis, we
don't really know who we might treat this
pre-type I state. Certainly we could make a
few reasonable guesses, but any benefit is
still in doubt until there are human trials.
I think this will definitely be more handy when
tricorders are perfected!
Building a healthy future; Connecting communities
Lots of cool marker based diagnostic methods are possible. These methods basically take a non invasive assay and use it to predict whether you have a specific disease/phenotype. Microarrays, proteomics, and analysis of bodily fluids (urine, blood, saliva, etc) all have potential to create noninvasive diagnostics.
I don't know about the parent poster, but for me it isn't the claustrophobia - it's the neckaches/backaches from holding position for an hour, and the headaches from the scanner noise (even with earplugs in, an hour's worth of scanning gets to be unpleasant.)
Both islet cell and pancreas transplants work to cure type 1 diabetes. They aren't viable for type 1s in general at present because of the great imbalance between the numbers of diabetics and donors but they are effective treatments. They may never be viable for most - certainly pancreas transplants won't be.
One of the many Open MRI systems.
Can you be Even More Awesome?!
(Disclaimer: I'm a primary care doctor in the USA. I have a few type I diabetics, and many type IIs.)
First, I think it's great that the researchers have demonstrated a potential way to identify pre-clinical type I diabetes. If these patients could be easily identified and the pathologic process halted or reversed, this would be one of the greatest feats ever accomplished in medicine.
However, this approach has several problems. Another poster has already mentioned that health insurance companies could start denying coverage to kids(and adults) who don't have diabetes, but might get it. If you're a health plan administrator, diabetes is a very, very expensive disease and you want to avoid these patients.
(Whether health insurance companies should even be in the business to make a profit is a topic for another debate. Short answer: It's absolutely wrong.)
More importantly, who do you screen with MRI? Do you screen every child at age 5 (or another pre-defined age)? Do you only screen them once? It's true that most type I patients are diagnosed by the early teens, but a significant portion develop the disease in their later teens or twenties. I have a 20 year old patient who was just diagnosed with type I after the birth of her first child. I also had a medical school classmate who was diagnosed while in his residency.
Once you've decided who you'll screen and at what age and interval, how do you pay for it? This cannot be ignored. An abdominal MRI can cost $1-3,000, and you often need to sedate patients because it's quite claustrophobic. If you were to screen every child only once, the cost would skyrocket into billions of dollars almost immediately.
Now in general, I favor small government, but regulation is necessary sometimes (especially with regard to the physical health of the citizens). Frankly, medical care is too expensive. And I'm not just trolling, it really is. It's a scam that starts at the med schools and continues on to the hospitals and the medical equipment producers.
Now, there is need for reliable medical equipment, properly maintained hospitals, and skilled doctors, but that expense has been greatly exaggerated and we're paying too much for it.
And as someone who's worked repairing ambulances and medical equipment, I can't say they're particularly reliable or well maintained. Operating costs were constantly slashed, yet the administrators pay was ever increasing. Of course the cost to visit said hospital never decreased.
My father teaches at a medical university, so I've visited the place occasionally. (I have no interest in being a doctor, but it's fun to sit in on classes. My major was Chemistry, so it is pretty interesting.) It's a nice school, but I fail to see why it carries a $200k price tag. I suppose it's only because you'll graduate to make big money. (Don't even get me into some of the people who go to these schools. They make it quite clear that a passion for medicine or helping people is not their driving interest!)
Anyway, I'll bring this rambling rant to an end: Medicine is about the cash first. If people happen to get helped along the way, then great. Government regulation reining in medical costs to more reasonable levels would solve a great deal of these problems.
If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
The subject of this thread is not correct for the Slashdot audience. A more appropriate subject would be "Linux cures diabetes."
Type 2 diabetes is/will be a huge issue in health care for the foreseeable future. Type 2 is also known as Adult onset diabetes and is the one related to obesity and all. It is almost 20 times more prevalent than Type 1 diabetes. But this test only works with Type 1 diabetes(where basically, the body's immune system decides the pancreas is a foreign object and doesn't belong, so attacks it, destroying the insulin producing cells), detecting the early signs of trouble in the pancreas. I'm really not sure there's much money at all for these folks because I can't see them screening every child in the US every few years just on the off chance they might become diabetic. And for those patients who start showing some of the symptoms, a simple fasting blood sugar check is easier and cheaper to do.
The reviewer and posters are sort of missing the point, here, which is that if you inject about *2 grams equivalent for a human* i.e. 20 mg/kg of starch coated rust (dextran coated iron oxide) intravenously into a mouse, or presumably a person, you can see where it preferentially leaks out of microscopic blood vessels in areas of inflammation (here inflammation in the pancreatic islets due to autoimmune diabetes) by MRI (changes in the spin relaxation time).
Now that's a hack, to my mind way better than many others.
The entire pdf of the original article is available free on Biomed Central. Incidentally, resolution is not too important here, so this should work for "low field MRI", which uses ordinary magnets (.01-.1 Tesla), and costs about 10% of ordinary MRI (exclusive of technician and radiologist fees), i.e. a real currently existing "tricorder"
Troll aside, you're incorrectly generalizing your case to the rest of the population, and thus misinforming other people. Obesity does indeed strongly predispose one towards developing Type II diabetes, though it is neither always sufficient nor mandatory. If you are obese, you are at considerably greater risk of developing diabetes than if you were not. Just because you felt like you were getting enough exercise when you developed diabetes doesn't mean that sendentary habits can't cause diabetes in others. Also you never commented on whether you were obese at the time you developed diabetes.
Also, if you're going to accuse someone of attacking you, at least spell the latin correctly.
"No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
Yes.
I love these questions! They do the same thing on NPR. "Mr. So-and-So, do you think that this Gaza strip pullout will mean that peace negotiations can continue, thereby creating a harmonious world balance where children hold hands and laugh gaily, frolicing through streets lined with happy merchants selling kumquats at a mere 15 cents for a dozen? Yes or no?"
If aspiration is a virtue, achievement cannot be a vice.
I'm the first to admit I'm not the typical Type II, but as you said, obesity is not a sufficient cause, nor is a sedantary lifestyle. If it were, most slashdotters would be Type II.
As far as trolling, if I did, it wasn't my intention. There's a lot of misinformation and misunderstanding about both types, and I wanted to point out that exercise by itself isn't enough to prevent it any more than lack of it will always cause it.
Good, inexpensive web hosting
This new technique is neat because it works at smaller applied magnetic fields, of order a few Gauss (Earth's field is ~1/3 - 1/2 Gauss). This means you don't need big bulky claustrophobic expensive helium-cooled superconducting electromagnets, but can use simpler, cheaper coils.
Basically, you get injected with a bunch of small particles of magnetite, which magnetically saturate at low fields. If you hit an unsaturated particle with a varying magnetic field, its magnetization varies and it gives a signal that can be detected by a readout coil. When the particle is saturated by a few Gauss field, then additional field variation doesn't change the magnetization, and so there isn't much signal out.
By scanning an applied semi-static few-Gauss field, with a gradient so that the field is zero in some region, you can differentially look for signal in the zero region. By scanning this zero region around the body, you can cover the entire body region by region and so build up a 3-D image of where the magnetite particles are.
(This is assuming that this is the same technique as was reported in Nature a few weeks ago.)
It may not be worth spotting early if it turns out to be curable after the fact, which it might ultimately be. Though I would imagine that if swelling of the pancreas can be spotted on an MRI, so can a lot of other things they haven't yet thought to look for. This might end up being a broad, multi-purpose diagnostic that is cost-justified because it eliminates so many other procedures.
:/
I can see it going either way.
Mal-2
How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
I wasn't talking about you, but about the guy who was baiting you on this thread.
"No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
While MRI might be an interesting technique for limited research, as a potential routine public use, I worry that this is an advertising gimic. Big Med (Big Pharma) often dumps expensive protocols/studies (poisonous junk) on us instead of cost effective answers where there ARE positive actions that you can take cheaply, effectively. (pharmas: Damn it when the public wises up.) Do *your own testing* over the next few years then answer. And you do have to do your own research, as if your life depends on it, because it probably does. Most of you probably say it, now really go do it!
Type 1s: If I were in your shoes I might ask: (1) are there potential causes of the autoimmune inflammation (medical researchers *have* found dietary links in a number of cases, different researchers get different results - YOU will have to investigate & decide); (2) are there things that reduce islet inflammation (check on niacinamide, others), (3) are there things that will help protect your heart, kidneys, liver from damage (coQ10, alpha lipoic acid, ascorbates, mixed high gamma tocopherols, huge B vitamins, Se, Mg among a few ) ; (4) at the 99th percentile of successful survivors do they use personal restrictions that reduce incidents. In general one has to be careful about commercial conflicts of interest with pharmaceuticals and procedure oriented medicine because it is so bad now. My family has been screwed more than 75% by the MDs over 40 years, our biggest "saves" have been in the alternative world (orthomolecular medicine) with many striking successes. Unfortunately most Americans suffer a profound ignorance about observation, chemistry, science and biochemical nutrients.
those strips are a buck each... I see glucose tester strips at my Walmart for under 50 cents, if that helps any. for the neuropathies I would investigate alpha lipoic acid, big B vitamins esp B1 among several ingredients for the nephrons, I would investigate high gamma tocopherol mixtures, B2, CoQ10 among many others
This is not medical advice - I would suggest seeing naturopathic doctors with recognizable universities or accredited degrees and, most of all, DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK. DO not blindly trust anyone but don't just whine what can't be done - it simply means you are not researching in the right places. Medicine is a minefield - you have examine concepts and to look out for the evidence yourself.
I personally have known specialty chemical sales as a dirty business on mere millions and I have specified chemicals by the literal truckload. How about you? What kind of boy scouts do you think pharmas are over multibillion dollar sales? I have followed their story for 25+ years in medical journals, alt med, patents, WSJ and some personal contact.
Vitamins are an order of magnitude or more cheaper than insulins, Yes. Also insulin may be a necessity, but I view it as something to be absolutely minimized. Most people don't do their homework or get good professional advice (often PhD or ND, sometimes MD). They often don't use enough, the right form or combination of vitamins, minerals and enzymes to succeed. Alternative medicine can make a huge difference and getting it right is non-trivial right now. I am not going to argue further, but Darwin is in play on this issue. So, good luck...
if it worked you would think it would be a fairly common treatment by now.... Most do think that but then it means they are not familiar with specialty chemical sales, especially
looks like some wrong conclusions
Heh, it's quite a funny link though.
Excuse me while I go eat my screwdrivers... hmm, think I'll order dinner from the hardware store tonight
---
(*) "Money"
Karma: I don't care too much, but it's 0.0% (mostly due to lack of interest)
- Most diabetics are "type 2", which usually dont have anything to do with pancreatic inflamation.
- Even for "type 1's" or peole at risk of type 1, what are they supposed to do, get a MRI every day, at $800 per scan?
- Even so, even if an inflammation is found, what can be done? Be on immuno-surpressors for a long long time?
This sounds like a technique more usueful for ivory-tower research on the progression of inflamation, not terribly useful to the end sufferer.Smaller volume = better signal-to-noise.
The signal comes from you. The noise comes from you and all the space around you inside the tube. As a subject/patient/victim you want more space. As a physicist, I want to keep it as tight as I can. We're looking for a small signal in a lot of noise. It's a compromise.
I'm glad it runs Linux because everyone knows that MRIs cost so much and are so complicated only because they run Windows. I bet now that they are running Linux, a MRI will only cost about $20 and any 10th grader will be able to operate it.
Another added benefit will be its superior security. I'd hate all those MRI machines connected straight to the internet to be vulnerable to hacking. Someone could take control and give a patient a superdose and inadvertantly give them superpowers!
Ninjas don't carry tic tacs
I wonder where the poster is getting their information that they use Linux. Neither the Science Digest nor the original PDF paper appear to mention it. -- IV
http://www.LinuxMedNews.com Revolutionizing Medical Education and Practice.
No, what you're doing is great. Howevr, I don't have the time for that much, and getting around Los Angeles by bike isn't practical, especially when it's a fifteen to twenty mile commute to work. Equally, you're probably less than half my age, so the amount of exercise you need is greater than mine. That's not meant as a put down, either. When I was in my twenties, I was more active too.
Good, inexpensive web hosting
Most people in this country have insurance. The number of people who could "afford" bypasses if everyone had insurance would less than double with universal insurance.
What makes it so there are no lines in the US is the ridiculous amount of money to be made, since we don't have a single payer system. There are plenty of heart doctors because heart doctoring pays big bucks.
So, if we went to a socialized medicine system, then perhaps there would be lines. With no real money as the scarce resource to decide what you get, time becomes the currency. Just like in Canada, or the USSR. Get in line for your "free" stuff.
I'm not saying socialized medicine doesn't have its merits, even perhaps is better than our current system. But it has its downsides too.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
As a Multiple Sclerosis patient I had a look at the links to see if there were any suggestions regarding my condition. There were and I read them with interest. However none of the proposed treatments showed full results of any kind of clinical trials. Claims such as the ones made in the various articles linked on "doctoryourself" would carry far more weight if backed by clinical trials rather than anecdotal evidence. After all, what about those who underwent these treatments who did not respond or even deteriorated?
As for the claims that drug companies are out to swindle the public, it's worth noting that at the doses required, the costs of these vitamin treatments would be similar to the two current approved treatments (interferon and glatiramer acetate).
I'm not saying that the articles are wrong. I'm merely saying that if what they are saying is right it needs to be proven beyond all doubt and any safety fears need to be measured against benefits. This is something articles such as this fail to do as far as I can tell.
Let's imagine that you can treat MS with mega-doses of vitamins. Let's also imagine that the deficiency of these vitamins in the diet is at least a contributory factor in causing MS.
Most of us don't take the vast quantities of vitamins suggested in these documents. Yet only 1 in 800 of people have MS. Logic dictates that vitamin defficiency is not the cause of MS.
Also there are several types of MS - not in terms of progression which is well documented but in terms of which bits of immune system are causing the damage.
Here is an article scanned from The Lancet from Aug 13th 2005 discussing multiple sclerosis in terms of the immune system:
Immunohistopathology to guide multiple sclerosis treatment.
See Research Letters page 579
Immunologists have often been accused of overly complicating medicine with details of molecules, cellular differentiation patterns, and insights with disputable usefulness. By contrast, the recognition that one subtle fact of medical history or clinical sign is the key to distinguishing between diagnoses, often with the implication of a completely different therapy, is a cornerstone of good medical practice. In today's Lancet, Mark Keegan and colleagues(1) show that immunopathological differentiation might lead to better therapies for complex disorders, such as multiple sclerosis.
Multiple sclerosis is a multifactorial disease, with interactions between genetic and environmental factors via the immune system. MHC molecules, which present foreign antigens and self-antigens to T lymphocytes, are encoded by the highly polymorphic locus of the human leucocyte antigen on chromosome 6. Specific haplotypes of this susceptibility locus, in interaction with other genetic factors and environmental influences, might contribute to the various phenotypes of the neurological deficits (eg, relapsing-remitting versus primary-progressive, severity, course). Although no factor has been proven as the cause of multiple sclerosis, the pathological changes involve inflammatory processes that lead to the production of cytokines, chemokines, gelatinase-B/matrix-metalloproteinase-9, autoantibody-producing B lymphocytes, and autopeptide-recognising T cells, hence its classification as an autoimmune disease(2-5).
Current therapies for multiple sclerosis are disease-modifying, rather than real cures, and have been given to rather broad groups of patients with multiple sclerosis and solely on the basis of a clinical diagnosis. The cytokine interferon B, and the co-polymer glatiramer acetate, delay progression, but are both fraught with side-effects and high costs.(6,7) These elements constitute enough grounds to search for better, more efficient, and less expensive therapies. One way to achieve such therapies is to detail the subtle diagnostic differences, subcategorise patients who might respond better to a particular therapy, and assess the benefits.
Combinations of attacks, clinical evidence and paraclinical signs, including neuroimaging, evoked potentials, and laboratory findings of oligoclonal bands in the spinal fluid, or intrathecal immunoglobulin production, are used in the classical Poser criteria for diagnosis of multiple sclerosis(8). The IgG index - ie. the ratio of spinal fluid immunoglobulin to serum levels - is a marker that suggests the involvement of B lymphocytes and antibodies. The index correlates with the ratio of gelatinase B to A, a marker of innate immunity.(9)
The study by Keegan and colleagues is based on the combination of two studies: the clinical finding that total plasma-exchange might help in demyelination diseases,(10) and the refinement of the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis on the basis of careful histopathology of brain sections.(11) Similar to other frequent autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes, multiple sclerosis is not just one disease. Instead, it forms a heterogeneous group of clinical and histopathological entities. For instance, T lymphocytes predominate in some forms of multi
Obviously, without islet regeneration, some insulin is required. But the right "alternative" treatments can have tremendous beneficial supportive effects especially with the other organs/systems (liver, digestion, immunity, heart, circulatory, kidney). I won't argue further, Darwin WILL settle the issue. So good luck. Again I would very carefully read those site links.
You might consider comprehensive digestive test analyses more than just "vitamin" testing. If the digestive system has broken down, you will presumptively suffer general malabsorbtion, requiring special nutrition for genuine repair and adequate intake.
Some of the B vitamins are directly involved in nerve cell repair of conductors and insulators and will be required at high levels.
I can not emphasize enough independent reading, research, thought and action. Those previous links are mere starting points. You might consider them as potential augmentation or therapy under knowledgeable professional supervision. Doctoryourself.com and LEF both give lots of references too.
Other technical fields categorically reject "vendor science" results as the last word as insisted in priestly pharma/medicine. (Perhaps if one adds "tobacco company" to "medical" or "pharmaceutical studies" the point is made) Individuals need to assess the situation, and make careful choices to prosper.
The various theories, evidence and remedial logic are lengthy but definitely not a waste of time. Here in the US the supplements may be somewhat less expensive. I am very thankful for the "alternative/ orthomolecular" medicine and consider them far more coherent therapeutic models in these areas.
The hopes you have for stem cells and genetic engineering may actually well be within your reach with proper biochemistry starting in your kitchen and aided by various supplements. Good reading.
A bit of advice - HMO's are cheap, and you get what you pay for. If you can get a PPO do it, you will not regret it if you have a problem. EVERY pt I see with an HMO regrets not getting the PPO insurance option.
..........FULL STOP.