Slashdot Mirror


Data Still Left on Storage Devices for Sale

cluedweasel writes "According to a BBC story many people are still putting up their old PC's and storage devices for sale without taking basic precautions to ensure that confidential data is erased. The suggestion at the end of the story is to get a professional forensics firm to wipe your data or just destroy the item in question. With the low price of storage devices, the latter is probably preferable."

403 comments

  1. Not only good drive but also bad drives by slashnutt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I always hate having to send in my hard drive for warranty repair. Years ago, I watched a friend recover information from a newly arrived warranty repaired drive. If the drive is dead and has to be sent into for warranty service, make sure one of those super powerful magnets from another drives is put around all over the hard drive case. Don't, know if that will wipe anything but I don't expect the manufacturer to ensure my data is secure.

    That said I used eraser every night.

    1. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by RandoX · · Score: 1

      I was wondering the other day what kind of shielding a drive has to keep its own magnets from wiping itself...

    2. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by MoralHazard · · Score: 4, Informative

      I seriously doubt that any magnet you can get your hands on would erase anything from a hard drive platter. Even bulk tape deguassers from five years ago won't do shit on a modern drive. It takes some seriously strong fields to erase a platter.

      However, sticking a decently strong household or lab magnet against the drive housing may tense parts of the delicate mechanism inside, causing the bearing to go south or the actuator arm to cease working. It's still probably possible to pull the platters and remount them in a new housing (if the platters weren't too damaged by whatever mechanical failure you induce), and there are a few outfits that can do it for ~$3000 per drive.

      Now, get real: Want to know the BIGGEST, best-kept secret in data forensics? The most effective way to forever put your data beyond the reach of cops and courts is:

          dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda

      That's right, just a single-pass overwrite with zeros will do. Everything else you hear is either 8+ years out of date, or uninformed bullshit, or a scare story.

    3. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Stripe7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only hard drives that I have got rid of have had a nail driven thru all the platters after a full reformat.

    4. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by lgw · · Score: 1

      Simply performing a BIOS-level format of your hard drive (assuming you have that capability - it's easy with SCSI drives) will suffice, unless your threat model includes forensics teams. Popping the drive in a different computer, erasing the parttitons, building a new partition, and filling the drive with random stuff works fine too. Sure, it's *possible* to recover data from a formatted drive, but by using methods that cost more than the value of the data on any of *my* hard drives to anyone else.

      The trick here is to remember to do *something* to clean your drive beyond the ability of a simple undelete utility to recover (and even worrying about that is probably paranoia) before giving them away.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Jason1729 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Once place I worked had enough buying clout that driving nails through the drives would not void the warranty. It was actually in the contract.

    6. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by ckliv · · Score: 1

      >That's right, just a single-pass overwrite with zeros will do. Everything else you hear is either 8+ years out of date, or uninformed bullshit, or a scare story. Are you really sure about that? I've read so many articles which imply that even a low level format can be "undone" by government technicians.

    7. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by pegr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Now, get real: Want to know the BIGGEST, best-kept secret in data forensics? The most effective way to forever put your data beyond the reach of cops and courts is:

              dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda

       
      /dev/urandom is a better source... With zero, analog analysis can be used to determine the drive's prior contents. Of course, if somebody is willing to do that to recover data, they already have your house bugged...

    8. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's right, just a single-pass overwrite with zeros will do. Everything else you hear is either 8+ years out of date, or uninformed bullshit, or a scare story.

      May as well do a second pass with /dev/random, though it's not like the cops are going to send your drive in for forensic recovery unless you're a big fish.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    9. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by freshman_a · · Score: 1


      That's right, just a single-pass overwrite with zeros will do.

      Correct me if I'm wrong (because I very well might be), but I thought even after being written over with zeros (or ones or some other pattern) data on a HD could still be recovered. Granted it may take a little more work, but isn't it still doable? Isn't that why tools like Eraser (see GP) write over the data multiple times with different patterns each time?

    10. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      People can still get your data after you zero your drive: they just won't because it costs too much and chances are you're not important enough anyway.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    11. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting


      That's right, just a single-pass overwrite with zeros will do.

      Um...no. Not to be argumentative here, but I have personally been able to recover data from a hard drive after being zeroed. This is why the DoD standard is a bit more stringent than simply zeroing.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    12. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Otter · · Score: 4, Funny
      That's right, just a single-pass overwrite with zeros will do. Everything else you hear is either 8+ years out of date, or uninformed bullshit, or a scare story.

      Have they made some change to zero in the last 8 years that makes it less constant?

    13. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by kfg · · Score: 1

      See the post immediately above your own. The black helicopters will be arriving shortly.

      Have a nice trip and enjoy the Caribbean.

      KFG

    14. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by fshalor · · Score: 2, Informative

      What if the drive wont spin up?

      But you're right if they do.

      I've had to pull 4 GB of rm -rf *'d data off a drive before using some tools and vi. Worked well, took hours, and I got 90% of his files back.

      I also got several versions of each file, some of them dating back over a year. Scarry...

      But if you dd a drive... it's gone from all the tools I had at my fingers. And I had a *lot* of tools.

      I've also done the "platter swap" thing once successfully (in a shower clean room) (twice failed) and several controller swaps. There's ways. But if the platters be stuck, and data important, take em out and bake em hard.

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    15. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      > The most effective way to forever put your data beyond the reach of cops and courts is: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda
      However, the most *fun* way to forever put your data beyond the reach of cops and courts can be found here.

    16. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was wondering the other day what kind of shielding a drive has to keep its own magnets from wiping itself...

      From what I saw in defect drives I opened, none at all, just some centimeters distance. The "strong magnet" meme is an urban m"yth. You need far stronger static magnetic fields to damage a drive without opening it than you can buy.

      In addition, if you succeeded, it would likely void the warranty anyway, so why not be sure and just decline the warranty or use an encrypted filesystem in the first place?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    17. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Now, get real: Want to know the BIGGEST, best-kept secret in data forensics? The most effective way to forever put your data beyond the reach of cops and courts is:

              dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda

      That's right, just a single-pass overwrite with zeros will do. Everything else you hear is either 8+ years out of date, or uninformed bullshit, or a scare story.


      I completely agree, except that

              dd_Rescue /dev/zero /dev/

      is better wince it gives you a nice progress indicator.

      Lets face it people, if there was a way to actually store the overwtitten data dnd the overwriting data on the disk, then HDDs would use it today to boost capacity. It used to be different, but HDD technology is now right at the edge of what physics allows.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    18. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Brain_Recall · · Score: 1
      Those won't erase much, unless you move the magnet REALLY fast.


      The changing of magnetic data doesn't so much rely on the strength of the magnetic field, but rather it's rate of change (magnetic flux).
      Wipping a neodymium-iron-boron (also known as rare-earth magents, the one that the voice-coil for the head assembly push against) magnet across the drive will practically nothing.


      However, a Degaussing wand (the same circiut that causes CRT monitors to go fuzzy when they turn on) produce huge amounts of magnetic flux. Those are mostly intended to demagnatize a monior, but perhaps they would work on hard drives. Care to test it out? :-)


      Links of intrest:
      Rare earth magnets

      Various professional degaussers

      Ask/. about hard drive eraser system

    19. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >That's right, just a single-pass overwrite with zeros will do. Everything else you hear is either 8+ years out of date, or uninformed bullshit, or a scare story.

      Yes, one of the things that annoys me about this topic is that Peter Gutmann's work is so old compared to how fast disk technology moves and I haven't seen anyone update it.

      I have to wonder, though: even if reading the edges of tracks is no longer possible, what's to stop a lab from reading overwritten bits using a custom head and controller? If that zero is really a 0.2 in the analog world (I'm oversimplifying outrageously in several directions at once), couldn't you tell that it used to be a one if your hardware didn't have be be cheap, portable, or fast?

      Recovery labs with vacuum chambers are exremely expensive and seldom used, though. Not an issue if you're selling your drive on eBay.

    20. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by rynix · · Score: 1

      I've tried the "platter swap" thing in the shower too. I have never got it working. So tommorow I'm going to try the sauna.

      --
      http://logd.programgeeks.net/referral.php?r=lordva der
    21. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by RapmasterT · · Score: 1
      well said. I've personally had to engage data recovery specialists to get data back from corrupted drives. Something as simple as a single pass overwrite with a single digit isn't going to phase a professional at all. That's like day one in data recovery school.

      DOD level wipes are the other end of the spectrum, a little overboard, but pretty damn sure the data is gone. Smashing with a hammer is pretty effective too. The data is still there, but if the platters aren't flat any more, they'd play holy hell gettign the data off.

    22. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Are you really sure about that? I've read so many articles which imply that even a low level format can be "undone" by goverment technicians.

      It used to be possible. For example a standard 1.44MB floppy can store > 20MB. No surprise you can recover overwritten data there. But for HDDs thy record close to the information theoretical limit. Have you read about perpendicular recording? The issue today is not that the drive heads could be made more sensitive. The issue is that you cannot put more data on the disk, since bit size and noise prevents it. If you could recover from an overwrite, then the disk could actually store twice as much data as its given capaciry. Think the HDD manufacturers would jump though hoops like the perpendicular stuff if the surfaces could hold that much more data?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    23. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Grym · · Score: 2, Informative

      May as well do a second pass with /dev/random, though it's not like the cops are going to send your drive in for forensic recovery unless you're a big fish.

      Exactly. If it's not undeleted, in the recycle bin or your internet history/cache, I find it highly unlikely that anyone will ever see it. CNET just recently ran an article that alternative browsers "impede" investigations, because detectives can't figure out where to find the files. LOL

      Granted, I'm sure the NSA, DoD, and CIA have much better methods, but for most people, one pass is more than enough.

      -Grym

    24. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by theJML · · Score: 1

      My favorite method of making sure no one gets my data from a failed drive is a few shots from an HK 45. Not that you could send it in for repair, but if you're that worried why are you sending it anywhere? Drives are cheap, just buy a new one and destroy the old one in any way you see fit. Heck, during the time you used the old one, drives have gotten cheaper and you can probably get a replacement that syncs faster, writes faster, reads faster, and stores more data. -JML-

      --
      -=JML=-
    25. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      It would be easier for the spooks to just plant some evidence. If they want you bad enough to spend $Ks on data recovery or evidence planting, you're screwed no matter what.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    26. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt that any magnet you can get your hands on would erase anything from a hard drive platter.

      I'm in the government, and our specifications require that we use this on media that is rejected by our RAIDs. It's a strong enough magnet that you can't wear a watch and use it at the same time.

      Don't make the mistake of keeping this tool in your server room next to the to-be-deleted media either: the first time you power it on next to one of your racks you're in for a Very Long Day.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    27. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Brain_Recall · · Score: 3, Informative
      Two reasons why:

      The magnets are at a far enough distance (a cm is huge, in magnetic terms) that they offer little problems.

      Second, magnetic fields of the driver magnets is orreinted almost exclusively in one axis. A normal refridgerator magnet will stick to the fridge with (almost) equal force no mater which way it was stuck (assuming, of course, it's semetric). The voice-coil driver magents are orriented heavily on a north-south pole. If you manage to pull one of these out, you'll see what I mean. If you let it stuck to the fridge on the flat side, you would not be able to pull it off. If you tried it on it's edge, it couldn't hold itself there.

    28. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by gweihir · · Score: 3, Informative

      ... but I have personally been able to recover data from a hard drive after being zeroed.

      And what drive generation/size was that? If it was an older, lower capacity drive, I have no trouble beliving you. If it was a current >= 200GB drive, I think you need to elaborate a lot.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    29. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by furry_wookie · · Score: 1

      >Now, get real: Want to know the BIGGEST, best-kept
      >secret in data forensics? The most effective way to
      >forever put your data beyond the reach of cops and
      >courts is...

      That's because most "cops" that do this sort of thing are only able to push the big red button on Norton's Utilities as their big secret tool for data recovery. Really, if it requires more skills than can be automated in some sort of recovery software with a big red button, then its going to be out of the reach of most normal police departments.

      Hell, probably just using Linux formatted partitions is enought to make most cops who are alleged data forensics people give up.

      But, I would imagine that once you get the feds involved things are a different story so don't get cocky.

      --
      -- Given enough time and money, Microsoft will eventualy invent UNIX.
    30. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by shotfeel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There was an article about a year ago (can't find it now) saying essentially the same thing about Macs. Most places just have the tools to hack a Windows PC for files. First, the Mac won't run their tools, and then, even if they yank the drive and put it in another housing, its not formatted in a way their software can access.

      Now, as said above, if you were a really big fish, they have ways, but its not a typical forensics op.

    31. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by eneville · · Score: 1

      > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda
      >
      > dev/urandom is a better source...

      Do you know how much time this takes, and how many CPU cycles are wasted? It will probably exceed any profit made from the sale.

      Better off using a script to stagger random blocks of 64 bytes at mixed positions over the surface to get the same effect.

      Personally I'd just write 0's then 1's then 0's again.

      I don't know if there's a better way, but pahaps I'll try a few things with a removable disk like this:

      echo $( yes 1 | tr '\n' ' ' ) > /dev/hda

      dd is just cp/cat with translation.

    32. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by hode · · Score: 1

      Have they made some change to zero in the last 8 years that makes it less constant?

      Introducing zero v2, holds even less and is as thin as a pencil!

    33. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I've read so many articles which imply that even a low level format can be "undone" by government technicians.

      And a second argument: How much recovery capacity do you think these people have? (I think none, but lets assume they can do it.) And how are they going to know that your drive out of many millions thrown away every year is worthwhile to recover?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    34. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by shotfeel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It used to be different, but HDD technology is now right at the edge of what physics allows.

      Not saying you're wrong, but I think an important qualifier might be "the edge of what physics allows" at any significant rotational speed. I have to wonder if you're willing to spend 100s of hours scanning a single platter with specialized equipment if you couldn't still make out a bit more. I really don't know, just wondering.

    35. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by dougmc · · Score: 5, Informative
      You need far stronger static magnetic fields to damage a drive without opening it than you can buy.
      Mod parent up. He's spot-on here.

      Strong magnets (as strong as you're likely to have at home anyways) will erase (ruin) floppy media just fine. And cassette tape media. And probably 8 tracks. I don't know what they'll do to QIC-150, 4 mm or 8 mm media. But they won't erase DLT media, and won't erase modern hard drives, probably not even if you put it right next to the platter itself.

      (Now, opening the drive up and scraping the magnet over the drum, physically damaging it, that may be effective. But a non-magnetic wire brush would work as well.)

      Personally, I erase my media with some variation of this --

      dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hdc bs=102400
      and let that go until it's done. Repeat if you're extra paranoid. Sure, there may be some data left in sectors that have been re-allocated by the firmware. Sure, the NSA might be able to recontruct my data bit by bit with microscopes. But if I'm really worried about that, I'm not going to sell my disk -- I'm going to physically destroy it.

      As for warranty repair, that's a tough call. If the dd can't be done, the odds are good that the company can recover almost everything on the disk. You'll have to consider the pros (you get a new disk! free!) vs. the cons (they might be able to recover all of your data.)

    36. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by magarity · · Score: 1

      Hah! Thanks for the laugh! Just in case anyone who doesn't know better thinks you're serious: What are called 1 and 0 for simplicity are really "high" and "low" where both are a range of accepted values. Writing a low over where a high used to be results in a slightly higher low than a low that was never high or even one that was high after three low writes.

    37. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by grumbel · · Score: 1

      ### May as well do a second pass with /dev/random, though it's not like the cops are going to send your drive in for forensic recovery unless you're a big fish. /dev/random is a bad idea since it tries to create true randomness and thus takes basically forever to produce any output worth to talk about. So unless you want to wait a few month till its done you better use /dev/urandom which is much faster since it doesn't try to create true randomness.

    38. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      (Jon hears moaning on his headset.)

      "Hey Bill!"

      "Yah?"

      "Do the logs show a woman entering the house today?"

      "No. Why?"

      "Er...no reason."

    39. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by E8086 · · Score: 0

      I usually use 3 passes, first all zeros, the second random data, random as in roll dice until you get your 8 number pattern then the third is back to zero. For anything more important I use Eraser with 50+ passes, it's usually the notepad docs I create for temporary use, credit card numbers, old resumes, pwords when I want printout of my getting larger list of misc passwords which gets locked in a safe place. 50+ passes doesn't take long for a file no loager than 30k. When a drive is reakky done, the platters get taken out and used as coasters. I'm hoping they'll eventually take enough damage for the data to be unrecoverable.

      For anyone who still thinks hard drives are fragile: try throwing the platters at a piece of sheet rock and see which one starts showing damage first. I saw label from an old Seagate which said the warranty would be void if it was subject to a shock in excess of 75Gs, I'm not a physicist but I think 75Gs is a lot.

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    40. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      DoD wipes, eh? You do, of course, know that that is so broad as to be without meaning. So a few questions.

      1. What kind of media?

      2. What kind of data?

      3. Clear or Sanitize?

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    41. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what's even more fun is holding one of those magnets up to a computer screen and watching all the electrons make pretty rainbow colors on the screen! ROFL! Did it in electronics lab once and... oops! Monitor no longer worked quite right thereafter!

    42. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by dougmc · · Score: 4, Informative
      Have they made some change to zero in the last 8 years that makes it less constant?
      No, but at the lowest level, your hard drive is analog, not digital. It's not just 0s and 1s anymore.

      To give an example, suppose a part of your drive had this pattern written on it --

      1 0 1 0 1
      and you overwrote that with 0s. So you'd expect to see
      0 0 0 0 0
      and you would, if you read the drive in the normal way. However, underneath the covers, the data on the drive would really look more like this --
      0.11 0.02 0.11 0.02 0.09
      the exact values are just guesses, but there is a pattern here -- if a bit used to be 0, it's very close to 0 now. If the bit used to be 1, it's still close to 0 now, but a good deal further than if it was a 0.

      With some different firmware, one could read most of the data that was on a drive that had been erased like this.

      This is why people 1) write random or semi-random patterns to the disk to erase it, and 2) do it more than once.

      Still, writing 0's just once to the entire disk will stop 99% of people who might read your disk. Writing random patterns several times will probably stop even the NSA, but if they want you bad enough, they'll stick probes into your brain and extract it that way :)

    43. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Bullshit. Complete and utter bullshit.

    44. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      Why pay for a tool that destroys your hard drive (clearly says will make drive UNUSABLE since it also destroys magnetic servo tracks) when you can get some cheap fun and education at the same time with a simple torx driver? Just open the drive, learn about how it works while taking it apart, then destroy the platters (translated: have fun!).

    45. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by sribe · · Score: 1

      If you could recover from an overwrite, then the disk could actually store twice as much data as its given capaciry.

      You're a bit off-base here. Reading track edges is not the only way to get at prior data. Remember, the disk media is analog. After a new signal is written, a faint version of the old one is still around as noise. The normal thresholding turns the noisy signal into the new ones and zeroes, but take that analog signal straight off the head and with appropriate signal processing you can subtract out the current signal and find the prior data.

    46. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by MoralHazard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, no. No, they can't. I used to have to explain this repeatedly to clients:

      UNLESS YOU ARE DEALING WITH A VERY OLD HARD DRIVE (pre 1997, at least), YOU CANNOT RECOVER DATA THAT HAS BEEN OVERWRITTEN.

      Go read the Gutmann paper from Usenix '96, and note that he never actually performs any recovery tests, nor does he cite anything other than reports of data recovery in lab situations under ideal conditions.

      Also, note that he REVISED that paper in 2000 or 2001 (not quite sure) to take into account the fact that platter encoding techniques post-1997 were vastly different form the platter encoding techniques of the previous era, making the attacks he discusses irrelevant and useless.

      Go ahead--I dare you to contradict me.

    47. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      That's because the most-used "police forensic tools" are the perl scripts we know and love. Of course, Mr. Cop is too dumb to port them.

      So, back on=-topic:

      1. buy usb keychain
      2. copy your custom worm/trojan/virus du jour to it
      3. return to store
      4. PROFIT!
      How much you wanna bet it hasn't already been done? - or -
      1. have friend
        1. buy storage device
        2. copy pr0n onto it
        3. return it
      2. have your kid buy the same device
      3. Gasp! It's Loaded With PORN!!!!
      4. Sue == PROFIT
    48. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by MoralHazard · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You're either:

      1) Talking about recovery from an old drive, pre-1997, OR;

      2) You're full of shit. Yes, a liar.

      So explain yourself, please, because I will apologize immediately if the case is (1) or you can prove me wrong. Cite me some evidence--press releases from the company you worked for, or a paper written by the research team you worked with. Anything, hell--even your blog is something.

      I've spent my last four years working as an examiner at a computer forensics firm. I have exhaustively researched this topic several times, hoping against hope that something is out there. There is nothing.

      I have encountered a number of documented cases where a party to ligitation claimed that incriminating or exculpatory evidence had been overwritten on a hard drive. In at least two of those cases, the defendants spent more than $500K funding people who said "Oh yeah, I can do that--I just need cash for a lab and a magnetic-force microscope." Nobody EVER recovered over-written data, in any of these cases.

      So prove me wrong.

    49. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      Why pay for a tool that destroys your hard drive

      So I can RMA it and get a replacement drive from the vendor, is why. Also faster.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    50. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Nikker · · Score: 1
      And if you overwrite all the 0's with 1's and vice versa :
      1 0 1 0 1

      would become
      0.11 0.13 0.11 0.13 0.11

      This levels the playing field cause it is the diffrence between the two that is the method for recovery, once you nail that your home free.
      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    51. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by jam244 · · Score: 1

      Even more interesting, imagine a drive with a special firmware that writes random images to a block before writing actual data.

      So if I want to write 0xFEED to a block that currently reads 0xABCD, it first writes 0xAAAA, 0x5555, 0xRAND, then 0xFEED. The old 0xABCD is now much harder to read.

      In this case, "writing" zeroes to a drive would indeed wipe it clean. Anyone know if such a thing exists? (runs to uspto.gov)

    52. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by cluedweasel · · Score: 1

      But they did it on CSI:NY so it MUST be possible.

    53. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by misleb · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between a "corrupted drive" and a drive that has been overwritten with new data, e.g. zeros. It is quite unlikely that you would be able to recover any data from a modern drive that has been completely overwritten... even once. That is way beyond your average data recovery professional.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    54. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Hikaru79 · · Score: 1

      Now, get real: Want to know the BIGGEST, best-kept secret in data forensics? The most effective way to forever put your data beyond the reach of cops and courts is:

      dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda


      What are you talking about? I typed that in five seconds ago and it doesn't do anyth

    55. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      When did this happen? The ones i used to use only held about 2 MB ... if that. Ahh... the good old days...

      was anyone else here brought up on windows 3.1?

    56. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      I've heard the persistant rumour that un-erasing data from wiped hard drives is possible. This seems to fuel the "wipe it N times or else you can recover it!" theories, with N increasing depending on how paranoid people are. I've also heard from people like you who claim it's never been done, is a load of BS, etc. Of course I've never heard of anyone actually being able to do it. The rumors all seem to assume the secret labs of the NSA and CIA do this every day, but obviously don't tell anyone about it.

      Since you've researched the topic, can you provide any referenced articles about the subject? The only thing I've read about data recovery after a wipe seems to be peoples idle speculation. Surely someone (university researcher, etc) has published something about this?

      --
      AccountKiller
    57. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by MoralHazard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's been said before, but I'll repeat the point here: there are enough surprising scientific discoveries that most people cannot distinguish between wacky-sounding-but-true statements and wacky-sounding-but-false statements.

      This is why people keep propagating the myth that you can recover overwritten data from current generations of hard drives. It USED to be true, with older drives, and it's just spooky-sounding enough to be intriguing, so people want to believe it.

      But it's still bullshit. Seriously, I would encourage anybody who thinks I grandstanding to do their own research and let me know. My email username is rlynch, domain is bway.net.

    58. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by dougmc · · Score: 1
      In this case, "writing" zeroes to a drive would indeed wipe it clean. Anyone know if such a thing exists?
      I imagine there's some market for such a drive, but the problem is that this drive would have 1/4th the writing performance of a standard drive, since every write command would cause four write operations. All that to make a known poor data erasing method more secure?

      Only the uninformed paranoids would really be interested in it. And the truly paranoid would probably find an encrypted filesystem to be far more useful. (Though a hard drive that had good encryption in firmware, that worked just like an unecrypted drive once the key was loaded somehow (and forgot the key once power was lost), THAT could have quite a market.)

      Even the government doesn't even really need it, because they don't ever sell or send back drives that previously ever had classified data on them -- they physically destroy them. In fact, they generally stay in locked safes when not in use.

    59. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by MoralHazard · · Score: 4, Informative

      The big paper that started all this is here:

      http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secure_ del.html

      (sorry if the link gets tangled). The author is Peter Gutmann. The paper you see on that link is actually an updated version of the original, which was published at USENIX '96, minus the "epilogue" section at the end. That's the critical part, where Gutmann basically backs off all the important conclusions about hard drive data recovery. He's still pretty optimistic in the epilogue (he talks about recovering one or two previous write passes of data), but you have to notice that he doesn't support himself, there, and the original citations don't support him, either.

      Not to speak ill of Gutmann--he's done a lot of great work in UNIX security over the years, and he's a stand-out researcher. But he doesn't prove what he's saying.

      Hopefully, the Gutmann terminology will be enough to get you started if you want to research the issue further. I used to have a couple dozen pages of cites and summaries on the issue, but I lost most of it when I left my last job. It's still out there, but it took me a couple of months to do it originally.

    60. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by TheGSRGuy · · Score: 1

      Two words: Boot & Nuke. It's DoD certified. I work for the IT department at a major university and we always use it before sending in computers for warranty work.

    61. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      Something as simple as a single pass overwrite with a single digit isn't going to phase a professional at all.

      I AM a professional, and it's not possible. Look, I'm too tired to type it all again, so just go here. I added a pretty good cite in one of the child posts, too:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=162112&cid=135 51345

      So you're either lying, or you don't know what you're talking about.

    62. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Look at Mr. Jonny-Come-Lately with his fancy GUIs over here. ;)

    63. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I helped decommision an office full of top secret computers a few years back. The procedure went something like this:

      1. Do a basic wipe/overwrite of drives - not one of the full DoD proptocols, which took far to long.

      2. Remove drives from machines.

      3. Remove platters from drives and place in big canvas bag.

      4. Smash bag repeatedly with large hammer.

      5. Have two people courier the bag to a secure incinerator halfway across the country.

      FWIW, there is no protocol to "declassify" magnetic media AFAIK. You can wipe it all you want, you'll never use it as unclassified media again. I know where there are about $25K worth of 15K RPM fiber channel drives sitting in a vault waiting to be destroyed because somebody screwed up.

    64. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by nherm · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tried using 2000+ passes using /dev/urandom, but somehow I ended up with a full installation of Windows 95.

      Then a friend of mine told me something about monkeys hitting typewriters and Shakespeare's complete works...

    65. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're right -- you aren't a physicist. An impulse of 75G is about what you get by dropping the hard drive on a concrete floor.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    66. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by jmichaelg · · Score: 1
      We sold a security product that wiped the drives 3 times if requested. The write sequence we used came from a NSA document that specified that we write certain patterns in a specific order. We had a beta tester who worked at Mitre who was feeding us the specs. Mitre needed to comply with those specs to conform to some contractural requirements they had with the NSA. Had they not given us the spec, we never would have known about the triple write requirement.

      My understanding back then was that the on-track data was wiped on the first write but there was recoverable data on the sides of the tracks. No one whom I asked knew if the sidetrack data was there due to field leakage or to variations in the head's motion as it moved over the track. In the end, it didn't matter much as all we had to do was to make Mitre happy so they'd buy our software. This was back in the late 80's.

      So what changed in 1997?

    67. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      was anyone else here brought up on windows 3.1?

      No, we used Amigas. That way, we didn't have to wait five minutes till a locked-up telnet client that couldn't connect would hand back the co-operative multitasking. *shudder*

      And BTW, I think the floppy disk reference was discussing its potential capacity using more advanced drive technology with the same disk.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    68. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by fossa · · Score: 1

      But, but, ... in Cryptonomicon they wired the doorway as an electromagnet which destroyed the evidence even as the authorities were confiscating it. :(

    69. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by ikkonoishi · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I here they fixed that problem with dividing by it.

    70. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by NichG · · Score: 1

      Well, if you have an object that drops for a full second and then comes to a stop in 10 milliseconds, thats 100Gs of shock right there. So dropping it from, say, one meter (0.45 sec) and then stopping in 6 milliseconds would do it.
      For some uniform resistive force, thats a deformation of the impact surface of about a centimeter. Probably dropping it from chest height onto a wood floor would violate that warranty, assuming it lands edge or face-on (if it lands on a point, it can rotate around and extend the time of the collision a bit).

      I'm not sure if the shock is really what you should use to measure sensitivity of a drive, since it can probably survive 75Gs for a short enough time (short enough that the acceleration stops before any two internal components are brought into contact). Total impulse maybe?

    71. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Think about it for a while, if it were possible to store 'old' data on the drive, HDD manufacturers would be using the technique to store more data a long time ago.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    72. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by RapmasterT · · Score: 1
      DoD wipes, eh? You do, of course, know that that is so broad as to be without meaning. So a few questions. 1. What kind of media? 2. What kind of data? 3. Clear or Sanitize?
      Well, if you're familiar with the DOD spec, then you'd know those questions are covered. So why exactly are you asking me this, just to show you know what we're talking about?
    73. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by MoralHazard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have they made some change to zero in the last 8 years that makes it less constant?

      No, nothing so drastic. Hard drive technology has fundamentally changed in the last few years, and there was a huge industry-wide turnaround in methods that happened around 1997. The bulk of the changes had to do with the encoding mechanisms used to write and read data from the platter.

      Even back then, these attacks were just theories, at least in public. It's possible that some spook-lab made them work, but there was never any real evidence that it was a practical technique, as opposed to a "space elevator dream". That's my opinion, at least, based on a review of the available literature.

      But the changes in drive technology made it all a moot point. There aren't even any plausible theoretical methods to recover overwritten data on modern drives, let alone any evidence that it's ever been done. So if you believe that it can work, you have to also believe that the method has been kepy entirely secret from public academia and the business community, both of which would be very interested in the topic.

    74. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Actually all current drives use RLL encoding, you would have to write a very unique bitstring to cause all 0's (low magnetic value) to be written to the drive. writing logical 0000000000000 is going to produce something along the lines of 10011010010000 as the whole point of comm encoding (RLL, MLT3, 4DPAM5, etc) is to ensure a minimum number of transitions in a given length bitstring. For MLT3, it is an 11 bit XOR feedback (IIRC).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    75. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by tzanger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >You need far stronger static magnetic fields to
      >damage a drive without opening it than you can buy.

      Mod parent up. He's spot-on here.

      Actually just misguided. Static magnetic fields won't do shit to most magnetic media. It's the magnetic flux (change in magnetic polarity) that puts the bits there in the first place, and it's the magnetic flux that will scramble them faster than a tornado through a chicken farm.

      I haven't tried it myself but I am willing to bet that a standard tape bulk eraser will render most hard drives inoperable, as it will not only zap the data but also the zone markers that are magnetically placed on the media by the drive's low-level format. That aluminum cover ain't magnetic so there's no magnetic "short circuit" around the platters and the flux lines that the bulk eraser's generating will penetrate deep and the rapid flux change it imposes on the media will make gone any order in the magnetic patterns that were there.

      Consequently that's why the rare-earth magnets in hard drives don't do much to the platters -- it's a magnetically closed circuit, and there are no stray flux lines to cross and cause a flux change on the platter. The only stray flux lines are the ones very specifically put there by the GMR heads.

    76. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      If it's a drive you are sending in for repair, that won't be possible. If the electronics are out, at the repair depot they can slap on another card and read your data. If they have the interest in doing so. Not sure why they would...

      --
      resigned
    77. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Savantissimo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Magnets just don't work for erasing data. One or two passes with good pseudo-random data are all that is needed, and even the NSA would be reliably stumped with 5 or more on modern disks. Writing constant patterns is somwhat less effective because the encoding to analog on the disc prevents long strings of highs or lows being written and because any residual field from previous writes can potentially be seperated from the constant overwrite pattern.

      You don't need to worry about this level of security if your threat model is phishers and the like. The people selling hard drives would like you to be so paranoid you won't let others make use of your old hardware, but there is no real need for that. If someone with the resources to go over your HDD nanometer by nanometer with SQuIDs wants your data, they'll first try a sneakier, more effective way than buying your old disks.

      For quick destruction of encrypted data, assuming the encryption-block size is several times the disk-block size, overwriting just one of the disk blocks for each encryption block will effectively make the data unrecoverable. Similarly, if you use an encrypted file of long, secure keys to access your other encrypted data, once that file is destroyed, everything else is effectively gone until the encryption can be brute-forced a few decades down the line.

      But for sensitive data that may need to be quickly destroyed, you're better off using CD or DVD media. Five seconds in the microwave followed by a quick couple of rubs with a piece of sandpaper to remove the flakes will do more than just about anything you could do to an HDD in a similar amount of time. This also gives you an excuse to get a really fat UPS and to have your microwave on your desk. Of course you still need to find a way to get the time needed to destroy the data when your door is being broken down or if your machine is tampered with when you are away - left as an exercise for the reader. ;|

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    78. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      So what changed in 1997?

      Density. Gradually. Therefore physical redundancy.

    79. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by logpoacher · · Score: 1
      > .... but I think 75Gs is a lot.

      It is, if it's you, cornering in a jet fighter!

      But it isn't when it's an impact shock. The thing about an impact is that it's an almost instantaneous deceleration.

      Imagine - the drive is moving at just 1 m/s (as if dropped from 5cm). It decelerates to zero in, what, a millisecond or so on a solid surface? Do the sums, and out drops 1000ms-2, or 100G.

      And I have a suspicion that my 1ms collision time is generous - after all, that suggests that your concrete floor and the drive's chassis bend by a signficant proportion of a millimetre on impact. OTOH, the drive will have internal shock mounts to spread the impulse out a bit.

      Either way, this is just 5cm (2 inches) from a hard surface. If it falls the 20cm from the case of your PC when it's on its side, then you're up to 200G: 3 times the rated shock. Scary!

      Here's a question to any mechanics folks out there. What is a typical impact duration for two such uncompressible objects? I've just been searching for some real data, because I wanted to not have to guesstimate, and the 1ms was based on a number of pages, including this bat and ball estimate, but the ball is obviously highly compressible. Are there any better references?

    80. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I work for a semiconductor manufacturer (arguably more parinoid than the government). When we had a lot of IBM drives fail (all the same lot code) I informed IBM that they were under warrenty, but that I could not release the drives to them without drilling them first (per IPSec policy). IBM said no problem, print this form for each drive, fill it out and mail it back, we don't need the drives, just their info.

      On a side note I found out that the 20 gig IBM Deskstar platters were made out of glass!
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    81. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by dougmc · · Score: 3, Informative
      I haven't tried it myself but I am willing to bet that a standard tape bulk eraser will render most hard drives inoperable, as it will not only zap the data but also the zone markers that are magnetically placed on the media by the drive's low-level format.
      I have. It didn't work. Not on DLT tapes, and not on a 500 MB hard drive I was playing with.

      I had to send the DLT tapes off to a professional service to have them erased (they had to be erased for the new tape drive to make them work in the new high density mode.) The hard drive was just me seeing if I could do it :)

      The tigher your cram data in there, the higher the magnetic fields needed to make changes. And modern media has it cramed VERY tightly ...

    82. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by RapmasterT · · Score: 1
      Something as simple as a single pass overwrite with a single digit isn't going to phase a professional at all. I AM a professional, and it's not possible. Look, I'm too tired to type it all again, so just go here. I added a pretty good cite in one of the child posts, too: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=162112&cid=135 51345 So you're either lying, or you don't know what you're talking about.
      You seem to get some kind of pleasure out of calling people liars, please try to keep the discussion civil if you want people to participate.

      Now, having said that, I've had exactly this discussion with two bonafied data recovery specialists, not random anonymous people on internet messageboards. Both have claimed that a multiple pass random wipe is required to prevent data recovery and explained the process of employing techniques that read the magnetic structure of the drives, not sectors/blocks/etc, and made my eyes glaze over and nod like I knew what the hell they were talking about.

      Now it's entirely possible that they were both lying, it's possible that it's trivial and you're lying about knowing differently, or it's possible that it's theoretically possible but simply not practical. I don't know, it's not my field of expertise.

      ALL of that being said, I DID say that I thought the DOD spec is a little excessive, but I would not count on a single pass of zeros to be trustworthy. Especially not when it's so easy to do random.

    83. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      Think about it for a while, if it were possible to store 'old' data on the drive, HDD manufacturers would be using the technique to store more data a long time ago.

      They would only do so if it were both reliable, and inexpensive to do so. If it only works 25% of the time, or costs 10 times as much to implement this increased method of storage, HDD manufacturers would just rely on the same advances they have been for the last 20 years.

      I'm not saying it is or isn't possible to recover data, only that your logic is faulty

      --
      AccountKiller
    84. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      One or two passes with good pseudo-random data are all that is needed, and even the NSA would be reliably stumped with 5 or more on modern disks
      afaict the biggest problem with this approach is that modern drives remap weak sectors so you can't get to the whole drive through normal software means.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    85. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by kwark · · Score: 1

      "For anything more important I use Eraser with 50+ passes"

      Well if the data is that important it shouldn't have been stored in a "readable" form anyway. Any sensible OS has crypto support these days to prevent just that (be sure encrypt places where eg temporary/spool files are stored).

    86. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by NcF · · Score: 1

      It'd be interesting to see a program that creates a pipe and forwards /dev/urandom, deleting some 'random' 5% of the data pushed through. I mean, on most standard linux kernels (not using GRSec or such), the PRNG isn't 100% random, so there'll be some fixed patterns.

      Oh well, just my thoughts.

    87. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by RevWhite · · Score: 0

      Maybe your porn is more valuable to others than you think.

      --
      Hey, can I bum a sig?
    88. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are full of it.

    89. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by kcbrown · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It USED to be true, with older drives, and it's just spooky-sounding enough to be intriguing, so people want to believe it.

      Which goes to illustrate that technology, and thus what can and can't be done, changes over time.

      And just because recover of modern drives that have been overwritten in a simple fashion cannot be done now doesn't imply that the same will be true in the future. That could easily change again, either because of changes to hard drive technology or because of improvements in recovery techniques.

      So while it might be true *now* that a simple erase of the drive is sufficient, that only holds if you're concerned about a relatively small time window. Otherwise, you're safest in assuming that you have to take stronger measures.

      And then there's always the possibility that the recovery techniques that are capable of working on today's hard drives are, if they exist at all, classified.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    90. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Now, get real: Want to know the BIGGEST, best-kept secret in data forensics? The most effective way to forever put your data beyond the reach of cops and courts is:

              dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda



      Ok, trying it now on my laptop....

      Hmmm. Doesn't SEEM to do anything but stop my MP3 player from working. Oh, now my email program crashed. WTF? I thought this was supposed to erase everything from my HDD?

      Why did it just crash Gimp? I can't believe you'd give such worthleASDFL!@#!@!@# { CARRIER LOST }

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    91. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by AxemRed · · Score: 1

      Every time I send a drive in for repair, the one I get back ends up failing within a year anyway. Drives are so cheap anymore, I prefer to trash the old one, and buy a new one.

    92. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately a few passes with random data is not as effective against a sophisticated recovery effort as is often assumed.
          Now if it's just some random joe with an undelete program he got for $19.99 at the local shop then a single pass is often enough, more sophisticated software only tools might get past a few, but with hardware equipment (probably not used often below the fbi/ pro foresnics places) you might want to do something a bit more secure.
          With good knowledge of how the data is actually stored on the disk you can figure out patterns that tend to degausse the bits being wiped and help eleminate the residual images left by the micro imperfection in head positioning (which are shrinking to almost nothing these days) and simular effects a trully sophisticated data recovery effort might use.
            Peter Gutman put out a paper about this that can be read at http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secure_ del.html
      that explains it better.
          Though with remapping and newer recording techniques things change and software only erasure becomes more and more problematic. At the highest levels of secrecy I believe most governments require over-kill levels of outright hardware destruction.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    93. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by dougmc · · Score: 3, Informative
      It'd be interesting to see a program that creates a pipe and forwards /dev/urandom, deleting some 'random' 5% of the data pushed through.
      I don't understand. Why would this be interesting? Would it be useful somehow?
      I mean, on most standard linux kernels (not using GRSec or such), the PRNG isn't 100% random, so there'll be some fixed patterns.
      Well, /dev/random is supposed to be truly random, but will block if it runs out of entropy. Which means it's really slow. /dev/urandom does not block, and just keeps re-using the entropy pool (which should keep changing as interrupts come in from the disk access) so the data isn't truly random. But it should look random as long as you aren't doing some sort of statistical analysys on it.

      But you want your drive to be erased in less than a month, right? Use /dev/urandom. It's more than random enough. (Use /dev/random when you need small amounts of `true' randomness.)

      /dev/zero is good enough to stop 99+% of the people out there who might want to read your data. To get data out of a drive that's been zeroed like that is not a simple matter anymore. But beyond that, any random-ish pattern is good enough. And if your data is so sensitive that you're still nervous, just physically destroy the disk already.

    94. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have to try that sometime... right now, I use a product by "Acronis" called "Drive Cleanser" & it works.

      My guess, were I to design it? Would be that it first vectors thru whatever folder/directory structures exist on disk, opens each file, does the 1-0-1 "DOD" type wipe, then one with random characters, & if NTFS?

      Renames EACH letter of EACH file, randomly... doing so, directory/folder-by-directory/folder listing of files held in a stringlist of candidate files to work on... doing so, until it hits the end of the lists it creates (which would be the files in the LAST directory/folder).

      Then, finally, overwriting the disk with one LARGE file, 1-0-1, & random characters, lastly reformatting the disk.

      Is this impervious to data recovery? Let me know from YOUR viewpoints if you would... this is because I am involved in such a project @ work currently.

      I believe it is a viable solution, assuming this product works SOMETHING along the lines of what I suspect above... assuming I am right about its methods/algorithms/engines/design of operations that is.

      Anyhow:

      Supposedly, it can even defy "deskewed" (correct term? Correct me here if I am wrong) attempts to obtain the original data from the disks' original files!

      (BUT, that part? That's easy enough to wipe out here though, as far as original file content imo, & for good, even on NTFS)

      Acronis' product also is capable of using several possible methods of DOD type wipes with random char overwrites (usually, I use the 4 pass pattern).

      It works as far as I know, & is "impervious" to original data retrieval.

      "Years ago, I watched a friend recover information from a newly arrived warranty repaired drive." - by slashnutt (807047) on Tuesday September 13, @04:22PM

      And, you're right - this holds true because even if say, the drive's actuator arm bearings go buggy, that doesn't necessarily mean the platter data is unreadable. It very well possibly STILL IS, and a diskeditor can show you that!

      (In fact, on that note? Acronis' "Drive Cleanser" program product has a disk editor built-in so you can even verify the drive content after any wipe-type you choose to use from its options as well... bonus!)

      APK

      P.S.=> This part of the field, forensics, I have been into for a wee bit now, & it is interesting...

      I will have to check-out this "eraser" program you mention here:

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/eraser

      So, all-in-all, thanks for the tip on that & if any, thoughts on my ideas & statements above! I am into this end of things, but only the last year now or so... as far as professional work & being on a team responsible for JUST SUCH A TASK, right now on the job...

      A bit BORING, but important to do, especially for the company I am doing this for: Financial Data in nature that is in question on said drives! Very important to make sure it is 110% clean...

      apk

    95. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by fshalor · · Score: 1

      Um... you kind of need to turn "off" the water afterwards. Then let it settle.

      We followed the howto posted on /. a few years ago about how to replace your HD cover with plexiglass. Works great. (IE, 1/3 of the time.)

      Forget the sauna... Try the hottub...

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    96. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Brian4120 · · Score: 1

      That said I used eraser every night. I use a program called DBAN. I love it. I have a friend who likes to download.... illegal things. He just had a WDhd that he sent in. i asked if he wiped it. all i got where blank stares.

    97. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      So while it might be true *now* that a simple erase of the drive is sufficient, that only holds if you're concerned about a relatively small time window. Otherwise, you're safest in assuming that you have to take stronger measures.

      Sure. But you're assuming that whatever future threats emerge will be exorcised by repeatedly over-writing disks right now. That's just as flawed as any assumption of where future technology goes.

      Look, the point is that all of these rumors of being able to recover overwritten data are based on a specific, provable technological phenonemon that manifested in older hard drives. HARD DRIVES HAVE FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGED. The old theories no longer apply--they're horse-and-buggy to the modern automobile.

      It's possible that in the future, they'll invent a "time-telescope" that allows them to look through the past and read my hard drive as it currently is. There are unimaginable future techniques that could emerge that will reveal the contents of MY hard drive, porno and all, to future generations.

      But you know what? That's all crystal-balling, because you and I and EVERYONE else has NO THEORY that describes how this could possible work.

      So. Fucking. There.

      I am SO done with this thread. I posted my email address earlier--if you want to continue the discussion, find it and hit me up there.

    98. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      You seem to get some kind of pleasure out of calling people liars, please try to keep the discussion civil if you want people to participate.

      No, I don't just get jollies from calling people liars. On this issue, like none other, I KNOW when people are lying, or at least misinformed and acting like they know what they're talking about.

      You do bring up serious issues--if you check our my posts on the rest of this thread, you'll see responses to them. I'm a little brisk, but I honestly believe that I have an informed, correct opinion on these issues. This isn't just an argument to me--it's a profession.

      If you want to discuss this further, I left my email address (slightly obfuscated) in another post under this thread. Feel free to email me, and I promise we can have a civil, rational, man-to-man discussion about it.

      Who knows--I might even admit that I'm wrong!

    99. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I know that harddrive manufacturs offer a free utility that will write 0's on the entire drive. But what I want is to see in additional option to have it write all 1's, then start over with 0's and back again. I would assume that flipping the bits back and forth a few times would flip the fields completely accross all platters making data recovery impossible...or so I would think.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    100. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      To recover encrypted data you need to recover whole blocks perfectly, and the probability of doing so becomes negligible with repeated random overwrites. The original data looks random and so it's impossible to tell it from the overwritten data. The residual risk is from plaintext in swapfile, and if you're taking these sort of precautions you already know to not use swapfiles anyway. (It's really irritating how OSes try to force them on you even when you have gigs of RAM.)

        The newer the HDD tech, the closer to the hairy edge the encoding is to the fundamental limits. There are very few magnetic domains in a bit these days. I read Gutman's paper back when it came out, but the concerns are becoming steadily less relevant. The constant danger of security is trying to achieve perfection in some area far beyond what the threat model demands at the opportunity cost of overlooking more likely risks.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    101. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I wasn't really commenting on encrypted data recovery, that as well as the higher density being used in more modern drive is indeed lowering the direct relavance of his work. However many people are still using somewhat older drives and no encryption worthy of the name, and for them a simple write or three of random data might not be so effective.
          Of course with prices today I see little point in selling off old HD's. I suspect many used drives on sale these days are 'left-overs' being sold in some shops from where a customer brings in a computer asks them to upgrade the HD, especially older computers with only one ide port. And of course the few (sad) people who upgrade and then insist that 5gig hd they bought for $300 new should be still worth near that.
          As far a swap goes, there are arguments for having it even if you do have gigs of ram, the thought that swap is useless with large ram is very debateable. The trick is to have a way to keep plaintext out of it, I believe there are some Linux distros, or at least kernal/fs patches, to do this.
          Going back to crypto I am not aware that windows ever got that right, I seem to recall some idiot design that made recovering the key trivial, so a known good 3rd party software would be advised here unless they finally patched all the problems (they did partially patch the one that effectively reduced keylengths to 32bit IIRC). Windows is what most people are still using, heck many are still using win9x and I have an uncle who refuses to go beyond win3.11 (sadly it was in part a visit to him playing on his c64 that got me really going with computers).

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    102. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      You also need to do multiple passes to be sure because the heads do not always perfectly align over the track, leaving thin bands of data on the edges of the tracks.

    103. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by BRonsk · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't know. My stereo system came with a big sticker stating you should not place the subwoofer next to a computer. Sure it couldn't destroy the HDD data in a few seconds, but over time - say a year - of this treatment, I think the huge magnet in there could have had some harmfull effect.

    104. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by SimilarityEngine · · Score: 1

      Total impulse maybe?

      IIRC, Impulse = (force applied) * (time it was applied for). Surely you could safely impart an arbitrarily large amount of momentum to the device, provided you did it over a large amount of time?

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    105. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      It's so much simpler to get information by locking whoever has it with Luigi and a pair of pliers for an hour than by wasting time dicking around with a hard drive in a white room than I frankly wonder why anyone would bother.

      Not that I think anyone actually does bother (even if it was possible with current drives).

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    106. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Actually if you lightly rub the erased portion of the disc plater with a pencil and hold it at an angle to a light, you can read the impressions left by the bits.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    107. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by pegr · · Score: 1

      Do you know how much time this takes, and how many CPU cycles are wasted?
       
      Me thinks you're confusing /dev/random with /dev/urandom...

    108. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just rename your files. For example the file "personal_information.txt" could be renamed "not_personal_information.txt". This way no one would be interested in viewing that file.

    109. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Otter · · Score: 1
      No, but at the lowest level, your hard drive is analog, not digital. It's not just 0s and 1s anymore.

      .

      This is why people 1) write random or semi-random patterns to the disk to erase it, and 2) do it more than once.

      Yes, obviously. My point was that the OP was claiming that writing zeroes is the best way to blank a disk when, as you yourself explain, writing a constant value is less effective than writing randoms.

    110. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      > You need far stronger static magnetic fields to damage a drive without opening it than you can buy.

      really?

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    111. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I think the lesson is that in the old days the densites were low enough that you could get some high power equipment to read the slop from the heads or do analysis on the residual fields to get the data. These days densites are so high that consumer hard drives are working in the same realm as the high power scientific equipment and there are no machines precise enough to do what you could do in the old days.

      Hard drive technology changes extremely fast, but electron force microscope technology changes very slowly. It was only a matter of time before the old techniques were rendered useless. The only hope they have is the fact that hard drives have to be manufactured cheaply and expensive scientific equipment can afford to be made to higher tolerances, but even that margin is slim.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    112. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by CyberZCat · · Score: 1

      The "strong magnet" meme is an urban m"yth. You need far stronger static magnetic fields to damage a drive without opening it than you can buy.

      Don't be so sure... http://www.gaussboys.com/product_info.php?products _id=71

    113. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At work we've used DBAN (Darik's Boot and Nuke) successfully in the past. Nice program.

      But a friend and I were discussing a while ago that this isn't ideal if "the man" is busting down your door. DBAN (or eraser, etc.) take a few hours to run on large hard drives. So, what to do...

      We concluded that one good solution would be to store all of the sensitive data on an external USB hard drive and set it up with a thermite charge on top of it with some sort of push button to ignite a flare or magnesium strip to get the thermite going. That'd take care of the hard drive quickly.

      But burning thermite is an inconvenient thing to have on your desk. It'd burn through the desk, the carpet, the concrete floor, drop onto the head of the guy in the office below yours...

      So, we need a way to contain burning thermite. Hmmm... Oh, look, the melting point of tungsten is a bit *above* the temperature of burning thermite! Cool. Now we just have to fashion a tungsten box to contain the rig. That'll probably be quite difficult, but doing things well is never easy.

    114. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      That used to work with old LEAD pencils, but modern pencils use graphite. This is no longer feasable.

    115. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by NichG · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right... I guess acceleration is the best way to measure it with a single number after all (that is, without bringing in geometric details... 75Gs of acceleration of a corner vs a face vs an edge, relative to the free-fall acceleration of the internal components...).

    116. Re:Not only good drive but also bad drives by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Did anybody mention that if your data is truly that top secret, don't sell the drive. Melt it, like the terminator dude was molten. Or at the very least take it apart, and toss it off a bridge somewhere, though don't overdo this because of pollution concerns. Most people don't have that many secrets, and even if your data ends up in other people's hands, including personally identifiable info, the culprit attempting to steal your bank money still has quite a chance of being caught by authorities. Chances are if you formatted your drive, people who buy it on ebay won't jump it and de-format it, looking for all kinds of cool stuff. It'd be easier to dig through other people's trash outside their front-yard, on garbage day, or even at the nearest landfill site. Who cares that much anyway? There is more to life than stealing other people's info, bank account numbers, and there is life even after someone stole your identity, though it can be quite a change and a struggle to gain your identity back and clear it, it's still nowhere near as bad as what just happened in New Orleans when someone you loved died in a flood. Still, instead of all this talk, if someone is truly involved, show me the code, like Linus used to say. Provide the world with a utility that will relatively safely erase your disk so you can sell it on ebay - though pranksters might abuse that tool for other things. When you look at the big picture, lost data is quite a horrible thing, and living with difficulty of complete data erasure might be preferable to making completely unrecovarable erasing way too easy.

  2. Found data by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've found some interesting stuff on hard drives purchased second hand including tax forms from apparently a CPA, medical records, patent applications, and most interestingly, a fair bit of data that I will not talk about on a NeXT cube off eBay that was originally purchased from a government auction. I was surprised as it was the only cube I had seen with it's hard drive intact. (All hard drives were erased or physically destroyed, because I am a nice guy).

    The interesting thing is that protocols for the destruction of data have existed for magnetic media since before the hard drive. With the advent of the hard drive and higher density media, other protocols have come into place, but the solution is not a technical one. It is the hardest of all solutions...... Behavioral change.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Found data by Otter · · Score: 1
      For normal sellers, a simple reformat should be fine. Even with somewhat sensitive data on there, commercial wiping software is adequate -- what do you think a "professional forensics firm" will do?

      Removing the hard drive might be OK for selling some uberovergamerclocker rig, but most normal buyers don't just have a spare drive around to stick into the computer they just bought for $75.

    2. Re:Found data by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >a fair bit of data that I will not talk about on a NeXT cube...

      Hmmm. The biggest customer of NEXT was the CIA IIRC...

      All aboard for Gitmo!

    3. Re:Found data by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      Back in i think 92/93, i bought a used hard drive from a local computer fix it shop. Thing wasn't even formatted. The previous owner appeared to be a police officer because the hard drive was filled with arrest records, court documents, correspondence... I decided it would be better to just break the drive then use it. And that was much more fun.

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    4. Re:Found data by saha · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Finding old hardware in my department to go to property disposition is a pain when getting rid of data on old hardware. First I don't even know if some of the hardware that is ten years older will even start. Then I have to find a floppy or CD that will run on the specific hardware. The easy solution is to open up that computer and rip out that harddrive, then hammer it so the platters are broken. Problem solved.

      I do like the fact the on Mac OS X on any System Restore CD or OSX CD comes with Disk Utility.app, that does either seven or thirty-five random wipes of the disk. Plus the user could use Secure Empty Trash from the very beginning. Waiting for a 20GB to randomly write bits in every sector seven to thirty-five times is general too much of my time. The hammer is a lot quicker.

      Signed: The impatient and destructive systems administrator

    5. Re:Found data by BWJones · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree completely with your solution. Physical destruction of the media is best and a ballpeen hammer is usually pretty effective. Although when I was younger and had more time, we would take hard drives destined for destruction out to the range. That NeXT Cube hard drive suffered a fatal wound by a 7.62mm round at approximately 1000 meters.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    6. Re:Found data by bani · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I bought some used DLT tapes off ebay. Most of them were empty, but a few which were not empty had:

      o) accounting data
      o) sourcecode for web commerce backend for multibillion dollar corporation
      o) server backups, including email

    7. Re:Found data by pilgrim23 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My hobby is retro computing. This means I have spent a bit of time at yard sales, Salvation Army and Goodwill. I have purchased cheap boxes of every description form Next Cubes to old Apple IIGS with a Vulcan drive inside the power supply, to early PCs. I have seen countless files, personal and public on machines for many many years. Being a good net citizen I reformat the drives and use them (unless I find a really hot app I wanted. :) -I would use apps I found (especially on old System 7 or earlier Macs, old Ataris, Amigas, and ProDOS based Apple II apps. Sometimes these boses were the ONLY sources of lost and needed applications (try finding a copy of raster Blaster these days ;). I would though: delete all files that were none of my business.

        In the course of this scrounging I learned something SlashDotters may not consider: There is an entire subculture in America of people who use second hand machines. These are poor folks who cannot afford the latest Alien ware or G5 iMac. People who just don't have the money for even cheap Celeron box. I am talkin' poor folks here. They get by on Windows 98 and Office 97, or even Mac OS 7.1 and MS Word 5.0 for their computer needs.
      They use a old Performa Mac or a Mac Classic II, or a 486 or Pentium 166mhz PC to do what they need to do.
        Tech support is supplied by a whole bunch of self taught techs who tinker. I know many of this sort.

      The size of this population of users might surprise folks. There are a lot of them.
      The problem with all the current talk of: "OH! I left Aunt Tillie's phone number in Outlook Express and all 26 of my credit card numbers in Quicken!" is the effect it has had on this catagory of user. They are not able to "upgrade" to a newer junker because everyone is afraid to dump their box for fear of the data being stolen. This means the bottom of the food chain looses. It also means there will ALWAYS be compromised Win 3.1/95/98 boxes on the net.

      BTW....if anyone out there has any older Conner or Western Digital (pre-Caviar) 20-40-120-240mb hard drives I am looking for a few to reformat as Vulcan Gold Drives....

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    8. Re:Found data by shokk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back at an old job 10 years ago, we were decommissioning some very very old hard drives in some Sun servers that took up an entire rack for just four drives, one shelf each. We decided to have some fun and break out the hammers, drills and chisels. It took us days to break through those with the measley tools we had on hand, but in the end we rendered all platters useless. Giant platters with multiple drill holes, awful scratches, fingerprint marks, bent and twisted. For a while we adorned our cubicles with these to show what real data loss looks like.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    9. Re:Found data by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > BTW....if anyone out there has any older Conner or
      > Western Digital (pre-Caviar) 20-40-120-240mb hard drive

      You mean, ST-501 interface disks?

      Shit, I threw about 20 of them out... about 10 years ago.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    10. Re:Found data by Willie_the_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Did you seriously hit a 5" hard drive platter from .62 miles away? What kind of consumer gun will do that?

      If you are serious, please don't ever get mad at me... ;)

      Willie

    11. Re:Found data by hurfy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      During the days of the 386 i bought a pallet of used xt/286 equipment and built several working systems from parts. Virually nothing was even deleted. Systems , programs, data, you name it was still intact... including the copy of Michelangelo floating around in there !

      Luckily Norton on my 386 found it while transfering data. Had to redo a couple days worth of setup on blank machines was all.

      Please kill your viruses before selling and careful with your snooping ;)

    12. Re:Found data by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      yeah those would do. humm Way Back Machine doesn't have a transporter interface...oh well...
      Mr Peabody where are you now that we need you??

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    13. Re:Found data by prog-guru · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the plans to build it were on his CIA NeXT drive ;)

      --

      chris@xanadu:~$ whatis /.
      /.: nothing appropriate.

    14. Re:Found data by BrainBarker · · Score: 1

      40mb disks? Those were the days. Had one on my Lobo Max-80 (which I sadly no longer own).

      Hey pilgrim23, you mentioned old software. I have an 8mm backup tape from a work Mac made about 1992. I don't own a Mac, and I've forgotten what software was used to create it. I do have a working(?) 8mm drive. Is my tape a paperweight, or might I interest you in a data-retrieval challenge?

      slashdot atsign brainbarker period com

      --
      "Dance like it hurts. Love like you need money. Work when people are watching." - Dogbert.
    15. Re:Found data by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      The probably software that runs your backups was called "Retrospect" from Dantz -Possibly version 2.0 or 3.0 I would guess. I would also guess the tape drive is SCSI. What I would do is: Get a PC with a SCSI card in it, a AHA2940 or 2920 Adaptec is a good choice. Now, make sure you have a bit of free space and load a Mac emulator. Basilisk II is probably the best: http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/bauec002/B2Main.h tml
      then just load Retrospect (it can be found many places and there may even be a download or two online...) Then restore data to a emulated "drive" and copy from HFS to FAT and you got it...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    16. Re:Found data by BrainBarker · · Score: 1

      "Retrospect" doesn't ring any bells, but you've given me much more of a plan than I've had so far. I'll give it a try.

      Many thanks,
      Brain.

      --
      "Dance like it hurts. Love like you need money. Work when people are watching." - Dogbert.
    17. Re:Found data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes yes, you will be sent to gautanomo bay at the drop of the hat we get it

      i mean if you look at a government official the wrong way you will be there in hours.

      (oh and stop saying gitmo, it makes you sound like a retard)

      please when you feel upto it, come back to reality.

    18. Re:Found data by teratogenicbenzene · · Score: 1

      Hitting a HD-sized target at 1000m with a 7.62mm round is...very difficult. You must have telescope eyes.

      --
      The Secret of Life: Proteins fold up and bind things.
    19. Re:Found data by BWJones · · Score: 1

      You must have telescope eyes.

      Or a really nice Leupold scope.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    20. Re:Found data by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Yes, we did. Routinely. There are lots of platforms capable of this kind of accuracy. This particular one was an accurized M40A1 with a Leupold scope.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  3. DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Darik's Boot and Nuke. Cheap, efficient, portable. Worst thing that happened using it was cleaning a PC so old its CD-ROM drivers weren't in firmware, so I had to download a boot disk off the net to reinstall them.

    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
    1. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love DBAN, but if this ever happens again, and you can't get the CD to work, remember, you can always remove the HD and put it in another system.

    2. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

      DBAN doesn't -- last I checked -- have SCSI or RAID drivers, so it is only viable if you're on a plain vanilla IDE system. I dont' know about SATA.

      dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/sda bs=512 count= (get this from fdisk) will do the trick in a pinch.

      On the other hand, has anyone here actually tried to "secure wipe" at 200+ Gb hard drive? It can take DAYS.

      Just drill a hole in the case; pour in some caustic drain cleaner or CLR (bathroom cleaner); plug the hole; shake vigorously then let sit for a couple days before throwing it out.

        -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Drop the "count=". dd will continue on until the entire file (which happens to be from an unlimited source to the entire disk) is written. Also, the default block size is 512, so you don't need to worry about that either. Though you may actually get better performance by using "bs=4096".

    4. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


      DBAN doesn't -- last I checked -- have SCSI or RAID drivers, so it is only viable if you're on a plain vanilla IDE system. I dont' know about SATA.

      According to the website, "DBAN has all available SCSI disk drivers". As of Dec 2004 DBAN has SATA drivers. I'd think RAID wiping should be done on each individual drive rather than across the entire RAID array.

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by farnz · · Score: 1

      On plain dd, bs=4096 runs the risk of not overwriting up to 3 sectors at the end of the disc. If this worries you, but you still want the performance gain, use dd_rescue, with a command of the form dd_rescue /dev/random /dev/hdx which will use 64KB blocks until they're too big to function, then fall back down all the way to single sectors.

    6. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      DBAN doesn't -- last I checked -- have SCSI or RAID drivers, so it is only viable if you're on a plain vanilla IDE system.

      Which brings up a good question, what IS the best way to secure wipe a RAID setup?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    7. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by chill · · Score: 1

      Which brings up a good question, what IS the best way to secure wipe a RAID setup?

      Probably to break the array and wipe the drives independently. Hell, you can probably run them all simultaneously in different terminals for "speed".

      Knoppix is the other option. I've had very good luck with Knoppix recognizing RAID devices then being able to wipe them with dd.

        -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    8. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      On plain dd, bs=4096 runs the risk of not overwriting up to 3 sectors at the end of the disc.

      It's not that much of a risk. Almost all file systems use 4096 byte sectors so that they align with the size of the memory pages. If you've got an uneven number of sectors, the file system probably isn't using them anyway.

      I like the dd_rescue idea, though. :-)

    9. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by farnz · · Score: 1
      Almost all file systems use 4096 byte sectors so that they align with the size of the memory pages.

      Not quite true. Filesystems like ReiserFS (v3 or v4) may use 4096 byte blocks for large files, but can pack several small files into single physical sectors (512 bytes). And of course, if it's in a RAID-5 array, that 4096 byte block takes up 4608 bytes on the disks (9 sectors), so that odd number at the end may matter.

      More realistically, my 120GB drives have 234,441,648 sectors, which is already a multiple of 8, so those last 3 sectors don't exist. Further, worrying about what might or might not be in the last 3 sectors of over 2 million (assuming we're mostly talking about really old 1.2GB or so drives) is major paranoia time. I just like dd_rescue, so I thought I'd pimp it here :)

    10. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by prog-guru · · Score: 1
      dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/sda bs=512 count= (get this from fdisk) will do the trick in a pinch.

      /dev/urandom is a bit faster. I also use that (in a shell script, to several files not a device) to test new filesystems. Being a cynic, I like to fill up a partition and delete all the data before I trust it :/

      --

      chris@xanadu:~$ whatis /.
      /.: nothing appropriate.

    11. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by bani · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, has anyone here actually tried to "secure wipe" at 200+ Gb hard drive? It can take DAYS.

      actually yes, using wipe on a 200gb maxtor on a reasonably fast machine takes about 1.5 days.

    12. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      The only problem is, I couldn't get it to boot on my SparcStation.

      Seriously, I got a SparcStation 10 at auction once that had a clean open install of Solaris on it, and null for a root password. It also had a professor's home directory with all his stuff (which I wiped out). I believe that box STILL has that copy of Solaris on it.

      --
      resigned
    13. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Not quite true. Filesystems like ReiserFS (v3 or v4) may use 4096 byte blocks for large files, but can pack several small files into single physical sectors (512 bytes).

      Uh, no. As I understand it, ReiserFS sets aside sectors for packing in small files. Like to take a guess as to the size of those sectors? That's right, 4096 bytes. FFS/UFS does the same thing, making it far more space efficient than the DOS/Windows FAT and NTFS file systems that came later.

      As I said, the reason for the 4K sectors is that the OS pages the memory to disk for writes. A page is 4096 bytes on most systems, so that's what's written.

      Of course, the entire memmap scheme in Unix (through which most everything runs) is a pathetic attempt at emulating one of the more powerful features of Multics: Files are directly mapped to memory, making access to files the same as direct memory access. Perhaps not quite as fast, but even in Unix memmaps still tend to be faster than direct file I/O.

      I just like dd_rescue, so I thought I'd pimp it here

      As I said, neat utility. :-)

    14. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by Professional+Slacker · · Score: 1

      Just drill a hole in the case; pour in some caustic drain cleaner or CLR (bathroom cleaner); plug the hole; shake vigorously then let sit for a couple days before throwing it out.

      But that's not nearly as fun as taking it out back and liberally applying a 12lb splitting maul. I still have all my platters (after running them through the aforementioned "treatment") hanging on my wall, I call it "modern art".

      --
      A Free Market requires informed intelligent consumers, such people are rare, we're in trouble.
    15. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by farnz · · Score: 1
      Go learn the difference between blocks and sectors before you comment. Then read and comprehend the ReiserFS source code. Two important facts should pop out at you:
      1. Blocks default to 4096 bytes, because this is convenient for the page cache; nothing stops you using a different size. For example, I have ext3 filesystems at work using 512 byte blocks (so the allocation unit is 512 bytes) on a system with 4096 byte pages.
      2. ReiserFS tail-packing uses left-over space in blocks, and space that cannot be used as blocks. It does not allocate blocks specifically for use in tail-packing; that's FFS-style fragment handling, which is different.

      The reason for 4K blocks is that the cache is paged in 4K chunks on a machine with 4K pages. On something with a different page size (e.g. a MIPS or IA64 box configured with 64K pages), 4K blocks is less efficient, but still works fine (which would not be true if the OS paged the memory to disk for writes, since the block would be accompanied by 12K of garbage.

      Reads and writes at the OS level can still be done on a single-sector basis; it's just inefficient, as each sector ends up filling a page in the cache, either with the other 7 sectors needed to make up one page, or with dummy data.

    16. Re:DBAN. Learn it, Live it, Love it. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Go learn the difference between blocks and sectors before you comment.

      No, I'm well aware of the difference. I was having one of my temporary memory lapses and couldn't remember the term block. Since I was in a hurry, I used the word "Sector" and hoped no one would notice. Ah well. :-)

      Blocks default to 4096 bytes, because this is convenient for the page cache;

      That's what I said.

      nothing stops you using a different size.

      Bzzt. You need to use multiples of 512, otherwise the blocks and sectors won't line up properly.

      For example, I have ext3 filesystems at work using 512 byte blocks (so the allocation unit is 512 bytes) on a system with 4096 byte pages.

      And? I did say that 4K was normally used because it lines up nicely with the page sizes. If you use a different size for blocks, it will still run through the paging system, regardless.

      ReiserFS tail-packing uses left-over space in blocks, and space that cannot be used as blocks.

      What is "space that cannot be used as blocks"? Blocks are managed by the Linux Kernel. You can't muck with the block size you chose. (Though there has been some mutterings about making the last few blocks of an odd sized device accessable in Linux as a partial block.)

      4K blocks is less efficient, but still works fine (which would not be true if the OS paged the memory to disk for writes, since the block would be accompanied by 12K of garbage.

      You forget about read-ahead caching. For sequential I/O, the reading is run through the paging system to make read ahead more efficient. So the OS is *designed* to read (and potentially write depending on your kernel version) more than it needs. So it fills pages as necessary. Pages used for disk I/O are not the same pages used for Swap I/O, as that would create something of a mess.

      Since the page is filled with the complete data from that portion of the disk drive, it can page out the correct data to disk. i.e. No 12K of garbage as you propose.

      I *don't* know if the page sizes used between the file and swap systems are required to match up.

      [info]
      [more info]
      [more, but older, info]

      Reads and writes at the OS level can still be done on a single-sector basis; it's just inefficient, as each sector ends up filling a page in the cache, either with the other 7 sectors needed to make up one page, or with dummy data.

      I'm not aware of any APIs that allow you to address a block device in a unit smaller than a block, but it's always possible that such an API has been added to recent kernels. I sincerely doubt you'd want to use direct sector addressing, though, since it would probably screw up the OS's attempts at block level locking.

  4. Your data = bonus by dusik · · Score: 5, Funny

    On the other hand, I always thought it was a good bonus for the custom when I sell a hard drive on eBay with my mp3 and pr0n collection still intact.

    Then again... they probaby would see the reiserfs partition as "Unknown" in the Windows installer.

    1. Re:Your data = bonus by uucp2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What is your eBay user ID? I'm interested in buying some... storage.

    2. Re:Your data = bonus by dusik · · Score: 2

      Aw... wish I had a hard drive to sell right now. The bids would probably go pretty high, with the slashdotting.

    3. Re:Your data = bonus by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I think M$ has upgraded that to "Evil."

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    4. Re:Your data = bonus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, as the typical slashdot user needs to buy a old used hard drive on eBay.

    5. Re:Your data = bonus by Jason1729 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well that shot right over your head.

    6. Re:Your data = bonus by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      And made it easier to delete...
      In early Windows versions (and DOS) that was almost impossible.

    7. Re:Your data = bonus by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good arc on that one, Peter North

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    8. Re:Your data = bonus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My gf sold her pc without delete anything, she just asked to the guy who got it to delete everything from pc for her.. gals..

  5. What this is really about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft and the BSA don't want people having access to the software products left on hard drives. Even if the original owner is no longer using it and has thrown out the original media.

    1. Re:What this is really about.... by ahaning · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      haha

      ur dum

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    2. Re:What this is really about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mode parent down

      mispelled your

  6. Re:Why Bother? by dusik · · Score: 1

    OR... you can give them to me :)

    Actually, check if local schools or other non-profit organisations take old hardware donations. I know some people would find even old computers useful, unfortunate as it is.

  7. Or just nuke it.. by squison · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...with something like Darik's Boot & Nuke

    1. Re:Or just nuke it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...with something like Darik's Boot & Nuke

      yeah, every home user should keep one of those disks lying around at all times. Maybe with "Paris Hilton Video" written on it.

  8. The only sure way to be safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Would be to disgard all used storage devices in a black hole. One could possibly snoop the emitted hawking radiation, but by then you will propably have changed bank accounts.

    1. Re:The only sure way to be safe by FSGeek · · Score: 1

      However in a singularity...

  9. The Government is the Biggest Culprit... by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I have my business card out there with many people for the purpose of snagging equipment that would otherwise get thrown out.

    I once received about 30 10GB hard disks from the US Army that were tossed in a collection bin (and someone called me to say they were there) which were not wiped and had a fair bit of info on them. Not talking National Secrets, but info that could have been used to cause problems, none the less.

    By far the worst, however, was a batch of 15 PIII computers I recovered from the INS. Not only had they not been wiped, but all programs and files were fuctional. Talking about Social Security numbers, Green Card information, and on and on. It was terrible.

    Of course, I do the right thing and both wipe and low-level format these before donating on to charity - but it still amazes me what info is given away.

    Both of these cases were 1 year+ after 9/11 too. People don't change.

    --
    DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    1. Re:The Government is the Biggest Culprit... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Hey I recently snagged a bunch of highend dell poweredge power supplies from state surplus ebay not going so well for getting rid of them. Email me.

    2. Re:The Government is the Biggest Culprit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I see we meet again, Mr. Anderson.

    3. Re:The Government is the Biggest Culprit... by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 1

      DAMN YOU OCTODOG [octodog.net]! DAMN YOU TO HELL!

      That's some pretty good viral advertising. Congrats.

      --
      Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
    4. Re:The Government is the Biggest Culprit... by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 1
      I wish that thing was my idea!

      No, there is a far more sinister reason for my signature. But, that is for another time and another place...

      --
      DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    5. Re:The Government is the Biggest Culprit... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

      A guy I knew bought a used PC from the Town Hall. The people there didn't even attempt to delete the files. All kinds of personal information about properties, taxes, etc. was still there for easy point and click browsing. No skilz needed at all. (He's a carpenter, not a computer guy.)

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    6. Re:The Government is the Biggest Culprit... by blincoln · · Score: 1

      No, there is a far more sinister reason for my signature. But, that is for another time and another place...

      You bought it for your children and now they'll only eat food that comes from R'leyh?

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    7. Re:The Government is the Biggest Culprit... by Fyz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we had an at least equally stupid thing happening here(Denmark) a couple of weeks ago.
      A hospital gave a kindergarten a truckload of paper for the kids to draw on.

      Only problem: the other side of the paper were discarded medical journals, complete with patient data.

  10. The best way... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    The best way to destroy data on drives is to have fun in the process.

    On labor day weekend, my friend's family and I went out and used old hard drives for target practice. I'll try to post pics soon.

    1. Re:The best way... by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 1

      I don't have anything to shoot a hard drive with, but I do enjoy taking them apart. I disassemble them in the civil way (though sometimes I dremel the screws off 'cause I don't have a mini torx)
      The Neodymium magnets are quite useful for the fridge (they'll hold a whole buncha take-out menus without budging). I even have one of 'em under the wall-mounted bottle opener. It'll snag a beer cap from 4" away.
      The platters make a nice coaster, mobile, or wind chime. Good tech art.

      --
      "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
    2. Re:The best way... by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      used old hard drives for target practice

      With the high density drives that we have today, the info can still be recovered. Not by your average computer user, but there ARE companies around that can re-mount the platters in special drives and recover the bits.

      They can even recover a failed drive from a striped array, if you supply them with all the other drives in the array.

      The only true way is to dismantle the drive, get out each platter, then run it through a really big AC degauser.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    3. Re:The best way... by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'd advise against using anything made of thick metal, *especially* cast metal, for target practice, as a ricochet is nobody's friend and shrapnel is possibility when brittle cast aluminum shatters. It does sound like fun though.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:The best way... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      The results of our erasure techniques were varied. One drive managed not to get hit. Another drive, well, we found the platters (and read/write arms) ten feet away from most of the rest of the drive.

      One of the drive's three platters were melted together where a 7.62mm round had gone through. That was interesting. Another drive survived a shotgun blast with little more than a bunch of dents on the metal surface.

      One of the drive's had its neodymium magnets take a direct hit. They were turned into a highly magnetic powder that stuck to anything and everything metal.

    5. Re:The best way... by Tongo · · Score: 1

      It's not to dangerous if your not stupid about it. A friend of a friend took me out to destroy some hard drives pulled from the local hospital. Up to the gun club we went. A .22 penetrated every hard drive type we shot at. 7.62mm will blow a big freakin hole out the backside.

      Just put your hard drive out about 20-30 yards out and have fun. If you still have whole platters at the end of the day, smack 'em with a hammer a few times.

    6. Re:The best way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On labor day weekend, my friend's family and I went out and used old hard drives for target practice.

      What, no stop signs left in your trailer park, Bubba?

    7. Re:The best way... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Clearly you have never actually shot at anything with a real rifle. To get a ricochet you not only need to hit something bloody hard (armour plate), but the thing must also be very well restrained or very massive. With a military rifle, you can shoot clean through a railway track - no ricochet. You can similarly shoot through a 2" slab of concrete, or a 10" tree. Ricochets mostly happen in Hollywood movies. In real life, most bullets and debris keep going generally forwards.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    8. Re:The best way... by Nonillion · · Score: 1

      I have some magnets I robbed from an old Seagate 4 gig SCA drive. I use them as fridge magnets, but be careful, you can pinch the shit out of yourself :)

      --
      "I bow to no man" - Riddick
    9. Re:The best way... by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Ricochets mostly happen in Hollywood movies.

      Some trivia from one of my electroacoustic music professors back at university:

      Apparently it's so hard to get a genuine ricochet that Hollywood has 2 or 3 recorded sounds of it that all the foley/FX people have been using since the black & white era.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    10. Re:The best way... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      A .22 or a .223? There's a big difference. Once of the hard drives we were shooting at stopped a .320 round cold. (It went in through the PCB, an aluminum layer, and expended the rest of its energy trying to get through three steel platters.) I doubt a .22 would have enough energy to get through, but the .223 rounds we shot frequently punched clean holes through, even at angles shallower than 45 degrees.

    11. Re:The best way... by lgw · · Score: 1

      True enough, but most people plinking away for fun aren't shooting a real rifle either - look at the various posts on this topic and you'll see handguns and shotguns are common, and 22 long rifle will always be the cheapest way. Richochets go "mostly" forwards, of course, but shrapnel can go anywhere with any velocity. Of course, if you're beyond 10 yards the odds of a problem are damn small, but a handgun at 5 yards can cause a hazard.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:The best way... by Tongo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have been more clear. I meant through the hard drive case itself. The platter always stopped the .22 round. The 7.62mm was way more fun. Never tried a .223 on a hard drive though.

      Hmm... I should take out my new .45 Glock and destroy a few hard drives.....

    13. Re:The best way... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      I'll concede that pea-shooters are dangerous and don't run with scissors...

      My dad recounted that he learned not to shoot at tree trunks with his airgun, when a bullet hit him on his forehead.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  11. State standards by lucky130 · · Score: 1

    Here at the university I work at we're required to format drives 10 times with random bits. I guess it's a regulation for all state-run or state-funded facilities.

    1. Re:State standards by lgw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For drives that have held secret information, the government requires that the drive be shredded to the point where it fits through a 1mm seive. Both approaches are probably overkill for personal boxes.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  12. Re:this is big news! by dusik · · Score: 1, Funny

    >> "Wheel, fire invented!"

    No, that was before the printing press was invented.

  13. Here's your "professional forensics firm" for free by xTK-421x · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://dban.sourceforge.net/

    Set that up for 27 wipes and you're set.

    --
    "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
  14. Use the military procedure for destroying the data by AltGrendel · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) Write all 1s then 0s to the drive, repeat 5x.
    2) Use acetylene torch and reduce drive to slag.
    3) Encase slag in concrete.
    4)Drop concrete in Marianas trench.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  15. and the quick solution: by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

    (for unmounted drives)
    dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdb bs=16384

    Or, use /dev/random if you've got the time and paranoia.

    --
    Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    1. Re:and the quick solution: by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      On any drive manufactured within the last 6 years, there's no point in using /dev/random at all. Besides, unless you have a hardware rand generator driving /dev/random, it would take weeks to wipe a decent-sized drive. And that's if you sit there and move the mouse to generate entropy the whole time.

      As a side note, on Linux and the BSDs, /dev/urandom uses the Yarrow algorithm seeded from /dev/random, which has been shown to be functionally identical to a true random number generator. So if you do need random numbers, use /dev/urandom and save yourself the headache.

    2. Re:and the quick solution: by gweihir · · Score: 1

      /dev/urandom uses the Yarrow algorithm seeded from /dev/random, which has been shown to be functionally identical to a true random number generator

      That is BS. Not possible in the information theoretical sense. Yarrow has passed some pretty demanding theoretical and practical tests and gives you very good pseudo-randomness if seesed and maintained with some true entropy, but it does not add entropy to its output, since that is fundamentally impossible. you only get the entropy that was put into it.

      A true RNG is all entropy in its output.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:and the quick solution: by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      I think what the poster was talking about is that it's functionally identical in this case. All you really care about is making analysis of any not-completely erased bits on the hard drive unrecoverable. A pseudo-random number generator is fine for this as I doubt you're going to need more than say 128 bits of entropy to make such low level analysis next to impossible.

      --
      AccountKiller
    4. Re:and the quick solution: by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      As the sibling-poster points out, I said "functionally" identical.

      Yarrow's pseudo-randomness is indistinguishable from true random entropy sources, except over extremely large iterations. Which means that there aren't any known analysis methods that have been able to beat Yarrow, except in a few edge cases that aren't normally functionally relevant. If you fill a 200 GB hard disk with pseudo-random bits from a properly-seeded /dev/urandom, and fill another 200 GB drive with bits from a true hardware generator, you won't be able to tell the difference.

      And remember: even hardware random number generators aren't perfect. Hardware devices sample an underlying physical process to get their bits, usually either thermal noise or radioactive decay or something similar where the behavior of events is largely governed by the rules of quantum mechanics. But the mechanisms that sample those events are never perfect, and so they all introduce some bias, and some patterns, into the bitstream.

      A good hardware generator will behave close enough to "true" randomness over a long enough bitstream for your particular application, the same as with Yarrow.

    5. Re:and the quick solution: by Skapare · · Score: 1

      If you don't have the proper OS installed and handy, you could just boot up my Diskzapper program. It comes in floppy or CD image. It's also handy if you have to expect a PHB type to do it.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    6. Re:and the quick solution: by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Actually, a quantum mirror RNG is pure entropy, IIRC.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  16. Old hard drive? by High_Noonan · · Score: 0

    In my own experience, I have found a single round from a .44 Magnum to be far more effective than 5 rounds of buck shot from a 12 guage. The 5th round eventually powdered the glass platters.

  17. Can't help but wonder by Snommis · · Score: 1
    How often these drives are REALLY salvaged and used for evil? Likely a small percentage. Also, how much truly "sensitive" data is found? On a vast majority of the systems I have worked on, very few people seem to keep much of value (read: home users) on their computers anyway.

    My method? 3 passes and drill a hole thru the drive.

    --
    Face it, do something enough times, and it can cause problems.
    1. Re:Can't help but wonder by pe1chl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Last year a public prosecutor discarded his virus-infected PC at the curbside, and it was picked up by a cabdriver who sold it to someone running a tv show.

      Lots of interesting data was extraced from the drive. Documents about legal cases, account information of his personal e-mail account, kiddieporn, the works.

      Of course he had to step down.

    2. Re:Can't help but wonder by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      You're definition of "valuable" needs expanding. Anything suitable for blackmail qualifies. Ever look at someone else's "Temporary Internet Files" folder? You'll probably find porn, among other things.

      Or the "My Pictures" folder. Lots of family photos, possibly including nude pics you'll wish you never saw.

    3. Re:Can't help but wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where was this?

    4. Re:Can't help but wonder by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      In the Netherlands.
      This news item will give you names and links: http://www.nu.nl/news.jsp?n=423176&c=50

    5. Re:Can't help but wonder by Snommis · · Score: 1

      Atmittedly, I quit looking at ANY type of image file. I still can't look my neighbor in the eye when I see him, but I shan't elaborate...

      --
      Face it, do something enough times, and it can cause problems.
  18. Most people don't know they can wipe the data by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And many don't have the tools - or if they have them, are unaware that the tools are capable of doing this.

    I find a large sledgehammer used repeatedly does a fairly good job of handling data getting into the wrong hands, mind you ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Most people don't know they can wipe the data by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Most people don't even think about wiping the data. I've seen data left on hard drives not even deleted. And we (geeks, anyway) know that deleted data is really still there. If we run BSD/Linux/Unix, we can easily wipe off a disk with the dd command. The format utility in Windows could also do so. And when neither of those is available or usable, or you have to depend on a PHB to do the job, the Diskzappper floppy or CD could be used. Disclaimer: I wrote/built Diskzapper for the PHB types.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  19. A friend at IBM... by Karma_fucker_sucker · · Score: 1

    had to take a sledgehammer to a hard drive after running a huge magnet over it. He said it was hard! Those things were buit so well at the time. But even then, if the platter itself was still in good condition, I guess someone could still get something off of it. What was on it? Some old code for one their OSes at the time.

    --
    Evil people don't think they're evil. - George Lucas, Making of Ep III
    1. Re:A friend at IBM... by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an attempt to get SCO to shut the hell up... ;-)

    2. Re:A friend at IBM... by bluffcityjk · · Score: 1

      Why would anybody want to steal the code for OS-2 WARP?

  20. I find personal information on drives constantly. by Zakabog · · Score: 1

    People around here upgrade there computers a lot (and by upgrade I mean throw out the old one and buy a new one) so I see a lot of old computers on the streets. I usually take them to see what I can salvage and almost 90% of the time there's data left on the drive.

    The interesting thing is, my aunt who is beyond computer illiterate, had me come over and wipe her hard drives clean before she got rid of her old computers. I guess if you're someone used to destroying paper bills and information before you throw it out, you'll understand that it's important to destroy information on a computer before you throw it out as well.

  21. Dban by Pushnell · · Score: 2, Informative

    For any who wish to avoid such "Data Dangers", I've been using Boot & Nuke (http://dban.sourceforge.net/) for some time now. It's pretty easy to use and supposedly reaches DoD levels of secure delete. All used hard drives my shop sells get a dban scrubbing before they leave.

  22. Easy on the Mac by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

    I don't know if there's a Windows equivalent, but whenever I sell an old Mac, I use the Disk Tool program, and select "Zero All Data", which supposedly flips all the bits on the HD to 0. After that, I'll do a clean install of the default OS version that came with the computer.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Easy on the Mac by Roguelazer · · Score: 1

      That doesn't even come close to securely deleting data on your drive. Multiple overwrites with random data, followed by a zeroing, comes closer, but not really. There's a website out there (that I've lost the URL for) which details the process. Basically, you need to overwrite with random data and zeros in a pattern which is carefully crafted to erase the magnetic information, but the order in which the steps are performed must also be randomized. Pretty wild. Unless you're a terrorist, or you have the true Ultimate Question on your hard drive, you're probably okay with a few random overwrites and a zeroing.

    2. Re:Easy on the Mac by idlake · · Score: 1

      Built into Tiger; there is a one-pass, seven-pass, and thirty-two pass erase.

    3. Re:Easy on the Mac by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I guess I don't understand how data can be recovered from a HD when the entire thing has been zeroed out. Could somebody enlighten me?

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    4. Re:Easy on the Mac by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that's pretty lame. Remember, the data may be digital, but the magnetic pulse content on the media is analog. Even overwriting one set of the same bit over and over doesn't guarantee wiping the signature off the disk, even if your Mac thinks it's blank. Steve Gibson documented this in his stuff on SpinRite:
      http://www.grc.com/srphysics.htm

      Fortunately, DBAN is also available for PowerPC machines.

      --
      "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
    5. Re:Easy on the Mac by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      A disk drive is an analog device that stores digital data. Digital ones and zeroes are stored as magnetic reversals (just like music on a tape recorder), and some readback amplifier and decision threshold decides if it is a 0 or a 1.

      The idea is that a 0 overwritten with a 0 has a different analog value than a 1 overwritten with a 0. The logic built into the drive will recognize both as 0 and output that to the computer, but a modified read amplifier can tell the difference and recover the data.

      It is like recording over an old tape and still hearing the previous recording in the background.

    6. Re:Easy on the Mac by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      A bit on the hard drive isn't really a discrete physical block that's all magnetized one way. It's more of an area with fuzzy edges that's mostly magnetized the same way. A spot that had been a one then overwritten with a zero will have a slightly different magnetic field that a zero overwritten with another zro, or a zero overwritten with one, etc. With special equipment and a lot of time, data-recovery labs can recover the bits that have been overwritten (especially if the whole disk was wiped with something simple like all zeros). If you overwrite the data several times with random bits then zero it, it's much harder to seperate what had been meaningful data from the random garbage it's been overwritten with.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    7. Re:Easy on the Mac by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Ugh. I just glanced at that article.. it's by steve gibson.. 'nuff said.

      That kind of overwriting doesn't matter any more.. maybe 10 years ago, not today.

      Just a single write from /dev/urandom is enough. Modern hard drives pack the data *really* densely and there really isn't any gap. No 'old' bits, no overlap.

    8. Re:Easy on the Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the (analog) real world.
      A 1 or 0 is determined by a magnetic field in a certain area above or below a threshold. In todays high density devices its a probability assessment of a 1 or 0 that makes it readable. If you have seen a oscilliscope of a clock signal, you notice there aren't sharp corners and instant jumps in the signal. This is how data looks on a drive. If you change the bit, there is still signal on the outside of the area that will give the previous data there away.

    9. Re:Easy on the Mac by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      I guess I don't understand how data can be recovered from a HD when the entire thing has been zeroed out. Could somebody enlighten me?

      Short answer:
      There's a gap between the tracks, and the read/write head drifts slightly.
      So laying a new track of data doesn't cover exactly the same space on the disk's surface as the previous track. Around the edges of the track is old data.

      Imagine this:
      You are encoding data as morse code via long and short white lines painted on the road from a moving vehicle.
      To re-write, you cover the old lines with black paint and paint over the line with new data - all from a moving vehicle.
      Depending on your aim, chances are that at the edges, old data is still visible. Multiple re-writes with random data will mean that your wobbles should cover everything along both edges of the line.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  23. Old machines from pr0n sites. by Karma_fucker_sucker · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if they auction them off too?

    --
    Evil people don't think they're evil. - George Lucas, Making of Ep III
  24. I don't get it by FlameTroll · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wipe all my drives with both Windex and Formula 409 before disposing of them yet my identity still gets stolen. Good thing I only I have a Visa Lead card.

    --
    A simple Troll, born of Rock and Fire, leaving in the basement of my parents volcano and typing on an asbestos keyboard.
  25. how do I get in on that scam? by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

    professional forensics firm to erase your hard drives? really?

    how do I market myself as this and sell that service to people? sounds like a great article to whip up some Fear frenzy that we geeks can make good money on.

    "Yup, I can safely eradicate your data and wipe that drive, no it's not easy, but that is why it costs $100.00.

    thank you, no we dont accept personal checks."

    adding that to my spyware cleaning racket and I can quit my job as a web programmer/IS manager.

    This rocks, any way to get CNN to stir it up as well to help the fear factor in the general public?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:how do I get in on that scam? by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm afraid someone already beat you to this scam.

  26. format c: by beforewisdom · · Score: 2, Funny


    format c:

    how hard is that?

    1. Re:format c: by wootest · · Score: 1

      Not very hard, but also not very secure. To my knowledge format just nils the filesystem tables, not the actual file content. Am I wrong?

    2. Re:format c: by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      About as easy as "unformat c:"*.

      A standard format is usually a "quick" format. Which means that recovering the info is easy. You need to do a low-level format in order to actually destroy the data. Even then, there are no guarantees. Your best bet is to insert a Linux boot CD or floppy and run:

      dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/[drive name]

      * Unformat was removed in Windows 95, so it doesn't work on modern machines. However, the existance of the command demonstrated that it was quite easy to restore the original file table to recover all the data. e.g. Back in the day, I accidentally reformatted a floppy that had data I wanted on it. A quick unformat later, the entire disk was restored.

    3. Re:format c: by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

      You probably are not wrong.

      I have worked ( at no longer existing ) companies that had tens of thousands of dollars worth of work stored on crappy servers that lost such file system tables.

      Recovering the information was not easy.

      I have to ask myself who is going to go to that expense to recover somebody else's boring mundane data.

      A business should keep their old devices or pay someone to destroy them, no doubt.

      Jane/Joe average is probably safe with format c:

    4. Re:format c: by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Actually this is how an internet pedophile got caught. He formatted his drive. What a surprise for him when the information detectives found evidence on his HD.

    5. Re:format c: by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Zeroing the bits isn't always effective. As long as you're using Linux, try "shred /dev/hda".

      However, it's easier to just erase specific files: "chattr +Ss rsa_key;shred rsa_key;rm rsa_key"

      That makes writes to the file sychronous, shreds the data, and finally zeros the data as the file entry is removed from the filesystem.

    6. Re:format c: by deviantphil · · Score: 2, Informative

      My distribution of Linux as well as Knoppix-STD has a command called "wipe". It over writes a file (or a special block file 34 times with several different randomn patterns.

      I make sure to do this with all drives I send back for warrenty.

    7. Re:format c: by MaynardJanKeymeulen · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't suggest shred, because it is ineffective on journaled filesystems, which most linux users tend to use. (ext3, reiser, xfs, ...)

      --
      "The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they make a vacuum cleaner."
    8. Re:format c: by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      That's what the chattr fixes. It makes writes synchronous. At least, on ext3. Don't know about other filesystems.

  27. USPTO by Leon_Trotsky · · Score: 1
    I purchased an HP-UX server last year from an asset recovery company in the US. Upon recieving the machine and not having my copy of HP-UX handy, I fired the thing up in single user mode. The machine turned out to be the DNS master for the uspto.gov domain, which I thought was interesting.

    Unfortunately nothing other than DNS records and a few applications licensed to the USPTO were on the disk. I just always wondered what happened to the rest of their off lease hardware, I mean there has GOT to be some confidential stuff there.

    --
    Ohhh! Pay Dirt! A pair of half-eaten choco-pants!
  28. Hmmm by OverlordQ · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It seems like every 2-3 months we get an identical story. This isn't new, and I expect it will still happen for quite a long time still.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  29. Re:Why Bother? by ahaning · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, check if local schools or other non-profit organisations take old hardware donations.

    My mother is the computer teacher at a local gradeschool. She HATES when people say they have a computer to give her. Invariably, it's some 7-year-old PC that runs Win95 or some old Mac that just doesn't fit in with her network.

    Students and teachers in schools want crappy computers as much as you do. (This being Slashdot, probably less than you do.)

    If you can find someone that genuinely wants the machine because they collect them or because they're a budding nerd, fine. But don't dump these pieces of junk on some organization that will then have a huge collection of PCs that are all unalike. If you're lucky, you live near a place like SWACO that has periodic computer recycling drives. Drop the machines off and they go someplace to be disposed of properly (we hope).

    --
    Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
  30. Wasteful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless it's defective or otherwise damaged, there's no reason to destroy a hard drive -- however low the cost may be for a replacement.

    Make wind chimes if you must. Hard drives shouldn't be treated like a disposable commodity.

    1. Re:Wasteful by Arjuna · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. IT is one of the most wasteful industries we have, at a time when natural resources and the energy to get them are in short supply.

  31. Re:Use the military procedure for destroying the d by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

    5) Ship via US Postal Service

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  32. Smash it to bits? by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...they should use a professional forensics firm to erase it. "Alternatively," he said "they could smash it to bits."
    Unfortunately, the author doesn't understand that the data is already in bits, so this won't help. I would recommend a multiple-pass approach: First split it into big sectors, then into large mega bytes, then again into smaller bytes, then finally tiny nibbles.
    1. Re:Smash it to bits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reduce it to a cloud of highly unstable sub-atomic particles

  33. Nonsense. by topical_surfactant · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Two or three consecutive low-level formats followed by a re-partioning with massive random data files would probably do the trick.

  34. What are they doing selling it with a drive? by cryptomancer · · Score: 1

    I can understand selling a computer system.. but with the drive still in it? Are they mad? Save the drive! You'll *need* the space, plus you get to keep what you had on it anyway! If you need more space, you buy a new, bigger drive (and maybe a system around it), and put the old one in the system. Then, at least if you do ever decide to part with the drive, you've moved your files off it and reformatted it anyway.

    Or you fragged the drive, in which case you can only sell it as a paperweight.

    --
    Yes, we understand these tags always apply: fud, dupe, typo, slashdotted, topic name
    1. Re:What are they doing selling it with a drive? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Why would I need the space?

      When I went to college, I bought a new computer with a 750 MB drive.

      When that filled up after THREE years, I bought a new computer with a 7 GB drive. Keeping the smaller drive around and installed is pointless, given how drastically larger the new drive is.

      When that filled up after 2-3 years, I built a computer with a 40 GB drive. 2-3 years later, I rebuilt with a 200 GB drive.

      With the exponential growth in hard drive size, very few people ever *need* the space that their old drive provides.

      (FWIW, all my old drives are still sitting on a shelf above my desk. I cannot stand the thought of destroying a perfectly good drive, but I don't feel like going back and verifying that they are all clean before giving them away.)

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:What are they doing selling it with a drive? by cryptomancer · · Score: 1

      Maybe I forgot to add this idea in there somewhere too: What, you only have one system? Someone else frags their drive, you inherit the hardware, reconfigure a few things and bam, secondary system with old drive running something other than your college desktop machine. ...Which if it took 3 years to fill up must mean you either scrupulously only did schoolwork on it, or you didn't have 'net at your U. ^_~

      --
      Yes, we understand these tags always apply: fud, dupe, typo, slashdotted, topic name
    3. Re:What are they doing selling it with a drive? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I've tried to build second computers out of primary ones. It usually doesn't work, because I'm replacing a part of the primary system for a reason. (Last upgrade, I had random blue screens that were a bug in the north bridge chip I think, possibly caused by overheating. That machine ran very hot. Upgrade before that, the video card shorted while on the motherboard.)

      I do have a second machine, but I maintain its upgrade schedule separately.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  35. My Experience with a Used PC by mykepredko · · Score: 3, Funny

    A couple of years ago, we had to buy a PC with Windows/95 on it because a speech therapist had a program for my daughter that only ran on Win/95.

    We were able to find a PC that had just turned in to a local "Cash Converters" and the OS had not yet been wiped/updated and got it for $50. We did try the PC before leaving the store but did not hook up a set of speakers.

    When we got home, we discovered that the previous owner of the PC was an affectionado of Jamacian S&M. The first time I turned it on, the PC started up with somebody screaming "Hurt me Mon!" and every mouse click produced a woman's scream.

    I was able to reset the default sounds on the PC and delete the thousands of jpegs of bondage pictures, but my daughter (who was 8 at the time) was pretty much traumatized and refused to work on the PC until I could demonstrate it wouldn't make the "scary screams" any more.

    We were able to run the speech therapy program, but my daughter never did trust that PC and made me sell it when the therapy was finished.

    myke

    1. Re:My Experience with a Used PC by Ratbert42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had a similar experience. Now my daughter shrieks whenever she sees a bathtub or even chocolate.

    2. Re:My Experience with a Used PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a similar experience. Now my dog shrieks whenever she sees a bathtub or even a brush.

    3. Re:My Experience with a Used PC by DrSpirograph · · Score: 1

      Surely you couldn't have asked for a better incentive for her not to slack off - the computer and the sounds stay until you've finished the therapy!

  36. 7.62 x 39 by Control-Z · · Score: 1


        A Romanian SAR-1 does a great job!

        A shot or two will penetrate all the platters and leave them a twisted mess.

    1. Re:7.62 x 39 by winkydink · · Score: 1

      With platter densities as high as they currently are, merely breaking the platter does not ensure that significant amounts data cannot be recovered.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:7.62 x 39 by Control-Z · · Score: 1


      With platter densities as high as they currently are, merely breaking the platter does not ensure that significant amounts data cannot be recovered.

          Yeah that's what I figured, but it would probably take a 3 letter agency to do it. My stuff ain't that secret.

  37. For average people by L.+VeGas · · Score: 2, Informative

    A lot of people, when disposing of a computer, want to keep the OS and the applications installed because they're giving it to a relative or friend or something like that If that's the case, something like Derek's Boot and Nuke obviously isn't appropriate. There are, however many tools out there that help you clean up a windows machine such as Eraserto wipe data and CCleaner to clear out temp junk.

  38. Haven't we seen this story in some form before? by garylian · · Score: 1

    Hasn't this story been run a few dozen times before? http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/31/06 18205&tid=158&tid=198&tid=172&tid=218

    This isn't exactly rocket science, but maybe companies like Dell and other PC sellers should include a free disk scrubbing utility when they send out a replacement HD.

    Lord knows, Dell didn't even bother sending out an extra ATA cable. When my wife's new PC had it's 250GB HD die, I had to buy another cable to copy the resurrected data to the new HD. Then, I had to find a decent HD scrubber to clean the old one, since it had our info from Quicken and probably cache related stuff to online banking, etc.

    Hmmm, maybe I should do a recovery on that new HD they sent us... Nah, not worth the effort.

  39. USB keys by Gruneun · · Score: 4, Informative

    I raised this issue with the manufacturer of my USB key, after it ceased to communicate. I was offered a brand-new one upon receipt of the old one, but had no way to clear the data (a CVS tree of our product). The tech said any obvious, physical damage (i.e smashing with a hammer) would void the replacement guarantee.

    Apparently, a few seconds in the microwave does not qualify as obvious, physical damage.

    1. Re:USB keys by pe1chl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But does that destroy the data? Did you check that on anohter key?

    2. Re:USB keys by ipfwadm · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ummm, for the price of a new USB key, why didn't you just smash the old one and buy a new one?

      Is the potential loss (even if it is a very slight potential) of your company's trade secrets really worth $50?

  40. Eraser! by ShatteredDream · · Score: 1

    If you are using Windows, then you have to have Eraser.

  41. I'm sorry, but I just can't see how this is news by sunaj · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is it just me, or is it getting rather bizarre around here lately, with what passes for breaking news? Editors, please don't forget we are /. for cripes sake! We are the movers, we are the leading bleeding edgers, we know things. Please, please start editing again, and stop releasing crap!

  42. Re:Use the military procedure for destroying the d by -Grover · · Score: 1

    You forgot the most important steps!

    6) ???
    7) Profit!

  43. With Threads Like These... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Invariably in discussions regarding data found on used hard drives there are a litany of stories about what people have found on drives they have bought. In almost every single instance of this there's a disclaimer at the end lines of, "but I deleted it of course." I wonder how many of them actually did. And, of those, if they deleted only the data, or the data and the programs?

    I should also point out that I don't doubt any individual's account- I just don't know that I trust the whole population. Just a thought...

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:With Threads Like These... by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Well, despite what most people like to believe, they aren't important enough that their data would matter to most other people. If I picked up an old computer, it'd probably be because I have some use in mind for it, so that data would just be in my way. I'd get rid of it.

      The reason I don't commit credit card fraud isn't because I haven't managed to steal any numbers. I don't do it because it's wrong. Finding a couple random VISA numbers on a hard drive isn't going to suddenly change my mind about that.

      And the sorts of people who do harvest old drives looking for credit card info to steal aren't going to be submitting stories suggesting to people that they better protect their data.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    2. Re:With Threads Like These... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I'm sure those are all the people who *didn't* post. One time years ago I bought a couple of old 40MB Apple SCSI drives from eBay just for the hell of it... I won the auction for $1 (plus shipping, of course). When I got them, I immediately put them in my old server and started formatting. It was only afterwards that I thought to myself, "Damn, I should have checked to see if there was anything on them."

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:With Threads Like These... by Skapare · · Score: 1

      I didn't delete the data I found. I dd'd over it with binary zeros because I wanted to use the drive to store my data, not theirs.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  44. *****BOOOOOM***** by Theovon · · Score: 1

    I specialize in computer demolition. I have always been a pyro and I have always had a fascination with blowing things up. With computer security becoming an issue, and some lessons learned from the arrests, I have turned my talents towards something more constructively destructive.

    For $200, I will use shaped charges and implode and obliterate your computer. I also sometimes opt to run computers over with one of my various broken-down cars.

    [Disclaimer: This is a joke (attempt). While like to watch explosions on TV from time to time, I've never blown anything up myself, and I've never been arrested. And it's my cousin who owns all the broken-down cars.]

  45. Eve of Destruction by fm6 · · Score: 1
    ... or just destroy the item in question. With the low price of storage devices, the latter is probably preferable.
    And do what with it? Throw it in the dumpster, where it will go into a landfill, and the heavy metals will leach out and poison your grandchildren? Computer hardware should be safely recycled -- which isn't free. Easier and cheaper just to wipe the drive. Especially if you're getting rid of the computer it's in.
  46. You say it like it's a bad thing... by metternich · · Score: 1

    I intentionally did not wipe my old computer's drive before I gave it away. There were some neat old games on there that don't work on "modern" operating systems, and if some wanted to recover the documents folder and read my old homework assignments, so what?

    --
    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
  47. Re:Here's your "professional forensics firm" for f by VATechTigger · · Score: 0
    I used to use eraser http://www.tolvanen.com/eraser/

    I tried to recover the date using some freeware/shareware data recovery tools found on download.com at the time. Could not get any to work. But the DOD 27 pass took FOREVER. I gave up and used my dads acetylene torch. Worked quite nicely...

  48. Re:Why Bother? by Maqueo · · Score: 1

    I agree. I once got ahold of 6 PIII from a local law firm (64 ram, 10 gig harddrives). I wiped (military standard) the drives, and combined the hardware into 3 desktop units running debian (128 ram, 2x10 gig drives).

    They are all happily being used as email/browsing computers.

  49. Thermite drive casings by MajorDick · · Score: 1

    5000 Degrees and I can PROMISE no data will survive.

    Thermite can be purchased for 60$ US Per 10 Lb from most pyrotechnic suppliers in the US (Also see special Effects and Welding)

    Muratic acid left to sit a few days will do the trick too ($5 US at any HW store).

  50. Re:Use the military procedure for destroying the d by McCarr · · Score: 1

    I once read an NSA document that recomended using a disk sander. Of course they had in mind large removable discs.

  51. Re:Use the military procedure for destroying the d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Objective: destroying data.

    Needed: 1 nuclear warhead, 1 detonator with long wire, 1 pair of running shoes.

  52. encryption by idlake · · Score: 1

    All drives should really be encrypted, whether they are transportable or not. If they are server drives, then the key can be physical (like a USB stick) that is left in place until the drive/machine needs repairs.

    Some recent motherboards have the right idea: they come with an encryption key (a physical object) that you plug into the motherboard for encrypting the disks completely without OS intervention as far as I can tell.

    Let's hope that kind of feature becomes standard on all motherboards.

    1. Re:encryption by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      I don't have anything to hide that needs that level of encryption. And I'm not interested in being part of a pool of people who needlessly encrypt their hard drives so that pedophiles and criminals have a pool of people to hide within.

      I'm also not interested in accusing anybody in particular of anything, btw.

      --
      resigned
    2. Re:encryption by idlake · · Score: 1

      I don't have anything to hide that needs that level of encryption.

      Well, I'm sorry you still live in the stone age. But those of us that do do on-line banking, that do have photographs of our own families and children on our computers, that have address books and personal letters, doctor's appointments and on-line passwords stored on our machines, in short, those of us that lead normal, wholesome on-line lives require this sort of protection from criminals.

      Having had computer hardware with personal data stolen twice despite careful precautions, and having been the subject of identity theft, I can assure you there is a lot that normal, law-abiding citizens have to lose.

      I'm also not interested in accusing anybody in particular of anything, btw.

      Well, I'm accusing you specifically of either being terribly naive or terribly technophobic. Take your pick.

    3. Re:encryption by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Why would I need to encrypt my drive containing any of the above.

      I agree that a firewall is mandatory for machines connected to the public internet. And I suppose if I lived in a dubiously locked dorm room or something that some of the other issues you raise would matter more. Anybody who gets physical access to my hard drive has physical access to a lot of paper records, too.

      I don't think I'm naive for the above positions. I think a number of the people who encrypt their hard drives are both naive and paranoid.

      Somebody mentioned motherboards with physical keys that encrypt your hard drive. Now THAT sounds like a damn fine way for a motherboard vendor to lock you in DAMN tight to their hardware with a hard drive you could otherwise easily transport from machine to machine.

      --
      resigned
  53. data destruction = open source growth opportunity by christian.einfeldt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tell your friends that you will take care of their old boxes. Bring a Mepis or Damn Small Linux CD with you and blow away their hard drive. Show them how easy it is to give a new virus-free life to that old box. If they don't want that old box after it is Mepisized, put it up for give-away on Craigslist or DIYparts.org. People have a much easier time understanding how good open source software is when they see it in action.

    Taking a sledgehammer to the box might be more fun, but then that box is headed for the landfill, where the metals in it will leach into the water table. Ick.

    DIYparts.org is working to help the Katrina victims, so rather than have the box go into landfill, it can go to somewhone who needs it if you list it on DIYparts.org. DIYparts.org is free as in beer.

  54. FYI by Gruneun · · Score: 1

    As far as the military, there is a very detailed plan for decommissioning computer equipment that contained classified data, whether that equipment will be destroyed, auctioned, or donated. Hard drives are opened and the platters are physically destroyed with sandpaper or other abrasive substances and even monitors are degaussed with a heavy magnet and shattered if burn-in is an issue.

    Other government agencies aren't held to the same standards, but the odds of national security secrets going out on a trashed drive are pretty close to nil.

    1. Re:FYI by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      but the odds of national security secrets going out on a trashed drive are pretty close to nil.

      That would only be true if the people involved in the process were as reliable as the machines - which, if you've worked for government, you know they clearly aren't. There are indeed procedures, as there is also a subclass of employee which will rarely, if ever, follow them, along with a second subclass which will usually, but not always, follow them.

      In government you'll never get a procedure that'll be followed faithfully, all the time, by every employee. Will - never - happen. Doesn't matter if it's civilian, military, or spooks. The only folks who believe otherwise are managers with their heads so far up their asses they can't see the light of day.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  55. drives are cheap, take the loss by E8086 · · Score: 1

    HDDs are down to about 50cents for 1GB and USB drives are also getting cheaper. It's safer to keep the drive and sell the rest if you want to make up some of the cost of new hardware. If you sell a PC with hdd and software there are probably some legal/license/EULA violations you could be held liable for, probably won't but there's a chance. Even the older slower lower capacity drives can still be put in another PC or external case and used for backups, there's nothing wrong with using all your IDE slots, cd-r/dvd-r and 3hdds. The 2.5GB hdd of my family's first PC is in a closet and the first hdd, a 60gb, from my current PC now having 2x200GB drives, before upgrades, is now in an external case being used for backups. As for flash memory cards&drives, my half dozen old ones are at home sitting in a box in the back of a desk drawer. If you have older/unused PC hardware and you want to make use of ebay, sell it without the hdd, the worst that can happen is someone doesn't read all the description and complains and leaves bad feesback, and you reply with "try reading the description" or take it appart and sell it as parts.
    If you're going to buy storage, consider it a loss unless you can find another use for it.

    Hard drives are like underwear, better if they're only used by one person, then burned and thrown out.

    --
    F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
  56. Hah. Try Dell refurbs. by kwerle · · Score: 1

    My girlfriend's sister bought a Dell refurb a few years back. It came complete with the previous owner's files, porn, etc.

    Thanks, Dell!

    (yes, nuked the drive, installed anti-virus, etc)

  57. Use a rifle not a pistol by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    "used old hard drives for target practice"

    With the high density drives that we have today, the info can still be recovered. Not by your average computer user, but there ARE companies around that can re-mount the platters in special drives and recover the bits.


    Well maybe if you were using pistols or shotguns. My friends and I tended to use rifles at 100 yards. When a platter has multiple .30 caliber holes data recovery becomes much more difficult. ;-)

    They can even recover a failed drive from a striped array, if you supply them with all the other drives in the array.

    What is so special about that, that's how RAID is supposed to work? Remove failed drive, insert replacement, wait, data regenerated.

    1. Re:Use a rifle not a pistol by rascal1182 · · Score: 1

      What is so special about that, that's how RAID is supposed to work? Remove failed drive, insert replacement, wait, data regenerated.

      RAID 0 (striping) has no redundancy. I'm pretty sure that's what the grandparent meant.

      --

      "Yarrgh! I be just a paintin' of a head..."
    2. Re:Use a rifle not a pistol by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Well maybe if you were using pistols or shotguns. My friends and I tended to use rifles at 100 yards. When a platter has multiple .30 caliber holes data recovery becomes much more difficult. ;-)

      Another fun one: put the platters on a clay pigeon launcher, and pepper those suckers with some goose loads. It's more challenging, and you can usually throw that thing a couple dozen times and watch it slowly look more and more like a dog chew toy. After a while, it stops flying very well, though. Also - wear eye protection - most geese don't cause ricochets like disk platters.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  58. Format C: doesn't remove data by woodsrunner · · Score: 1

    You are correct. Format C: only gives a false sense of security. As stated elsewhere, a drive needs to be rewritten with random data preferably a few times. And even this isn't good enough for the paranoid.

    1. Re:Format C: doesn't remove data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fdisk /mbr
      fdisk ( delete partitions and create new partitions )
      reboot
      fdisk /mbr
      format/u c:

      The /u = unconditional ( feel free to Google for more info on the command or if you have old dos box around then read the help on the format command)
      DOS/Win will give you the warning that if you use this format method then the unformat command can not restore your hard drive to previous format. Sufficient for most Joe Sixpack computers. Used this sequence a lot for replacing Joe's dead drive on outdated computer with used drives. It was rare that the used drive came in preformatted clean and even if it was already formatted, I made sure to format it using the above progression. For the paranoid, see other posts by other users involving multiple disk overwrites or drive destruction.

    2. Re:Format C: doesn't remove data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Additionally the previously stated method was of course done with seperate boot disk and was the surest way to remove old fashioned boot sector viruses. Thus the reason for the inclusion of the repeated fdisk/mbr to rewrite the master boot records.

    3. Re:Format C: doesn't remove data by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

      Is anything good enough for the paranoid?

  59. Norton Wipeinfo by startleman · · Score: 1

    http://www.symantec.com/ Norton Systemworks 2003 came with Wipeinfo, which claims to permanently remove files from your hard drive. You can also use a "government wipe" which conforms to a DoD document on industrial security.

    From the help file:
    Wipe Info erases files or folders from your hard disk so that they cannot be recovered. On Windows 98/Me, Wipe Info also wipes the free space on your hard disk.
    When you wipe a file, Wipe Info wipes the file and attempts to wipe any free space associated with the file and the file's directory entry.
    When you wipe a folder, Wipe Info wipes all of the files in the folder, and then, if the folder is empty, it attempts to wipe the directory entry for the folder.
    When you wipe free space in Windows 98/Me, Wipe Info wipes the free drive space, free file space, and erased file entries.
    In general, you cannot recover files that have been wiped. Windows Me/XP System Restore can restore files that have been wiped if they are one of the protected file types. By default, many document types, such as .doc and .xls files in My Documents, are protected. Windows Me/XP System Restore maintains copies of protected files. Wiping the original file does not wipe the copy that Windows Me/XP System Restore maintains.
    Wipe Info eliminates a file's contents from the disk, but does not remove the file name. While the file name remains on disk, it is no longer visible in Windows Explorer, and there is no data stored with it. On NTFS volumes, streams (alternate data that belongs to a file but is not stored with the file) are also wiped.

  60. Re:Use the military procedure for destroying the d by jorenko · · Score: 1

    6) Bury is soft peat for 3 months
    7) Recycle as fire lighters

  61. You forgot Step 0... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    0. Backup

    (In the military tradition of "Shred this, but make a copy first.")

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  62. Re:I find personal information on drives constantl by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
    I recently went to the local recycling centre to dispose of some old kit (PowerPC 6100s mainly, and the odd SparcStation 2 that I'd been trying to give away for the last year). While I was there, I picked up a 1.1GHz Duron that someone had thrown out, thinking to salvage the case. It turns out the machine worked fine. It still had Windows 98 and Office on it, and copies of the previous owner's letter of resignation from one job and application for a new one - including national insurance number. Of, and a copy of premiership manager in the CD drive.

    It's now running OpenBSD as a stand in for a friend's (dead) router, and will soon be passed on to my mother as an upgrade to the P3 550 she's currently using.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  63. Don't Sell Any Storage Device by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    In ten years I've never sold any storage device I've owned.

      Actually if you include the tapes I made in my tape drive of my Atari 600XL it would be about 20+ years.

    1. Re:Don't Sell Any Storage Device by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      In ten years I've never sold any storage device I've owned.

          Actually if you include the tapes I made in my tape drive of my Atari 600XL it would be about 20+ years.


      I still have my Apple II+ with dual floppies, 172k of RAM (yes, I know n00bs have only 48k), and the original floppies including my bootloading programs.

      So I guess I'm in the same situation as you, only it's 25 years.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  64. That's the second biggest secret by brokeninside · · Score: 1
    Want to know the BIGGEST, best-kept secret in data forensics? The most effective way to forever put your data beyond the reach of cops and courts is: ...


    Actually, the best kept secret is that the best way to keep something secret is not commit it to any storage medium outside of your head.

    Your tip is the second best kept secret.

    The third is the use of cryptographic file systems.
  65. Clearing out my old hardware ... by Schweg · · Score: 1

    I had 3 or 4 old hard drives around, from 2GB to 30GB in capacity. I just put them in a contractor's bag one at a time, and hammered them down into pieces. Someone would have to want the data pretty bad to get it back after that.

  66. Re:I'm sorry, but I just can't see how this is new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are the dupe posters. The grammar and spelling botchers. We are the ad sellers. We have sold out.

    digg.com. Just do it.

  67. Obligatory Starwars quote by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    I felt a disturbance in the info... as if billions of bits had cried in randomness, and then were suddenly erased.

  68. Re:Why Bother? by Trigun · · Score: 1

    I guy at work just picked one up from the curb, and it had all of the previous owners info still on it. Resume's, banking info, the works.

    Even a simple format would have saved that info, as this was not an IT worker that would try to get the data back, or could even get the data back. A simple trip to the local pc repair shop could have saved her her identity.

    Remember folks, not all people are honest, many of them just lacked the opportunity.

  69. Extra Income by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, when you get a drive on ebay look it over and you should be able to calculate just how much money you can extract from the guy to sell it back. All you have to do is them him there are a lot of doggie pics on it a real lot of doggie pics.

    http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/gallery.htm SFW

  70. In Holland... by Bootvis · · Score: 1

    we have a DA that dumps his PC unerased (with some questionable content). So it not only seems to happen to consumers. P.S. There must be a In Soviet Russia joke DA get spied on joke somewher.

    --
    Read, refresh, repeat.
  71. The government does it too by Pupp3tM · · Score: 1

    I work at a private K-12 school in the Baltimore area. We often order old parts from the NSA, since it's close by, they give them to us fairly cheaply, and they have nice stuff.

    One time, we found a hard drive stuck in an old machine that wasn't supposed to have a hard drive. It wasn't empty.

    Without looking at any of the data, we called our sales rep to let them know. There was a scary-looking (unmarked) van at our door in 45 minutes to pick it up.

    If only we could all fix our mistakes so quickly...

    --
    "Time is an illusion.
    Lunchtime doubly so."
    -Douglas Adams

    David Borowitz
  72. Same for hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I was in a similar situation recently when my laptop hard drive died. The manufacturer would only provide a replacement if I returned the original drive. I tried to argue that I couldn't do that, as it had all our company's source coude and NDA documents on it, but the hotline guy was intractable - new drives only for old.

    I considered nuking it in the microwave, but I wasn't sure whether that wouldn't destroy the microwave, and not the drive. (or why else have I always heard that you shouldn't put metal objects into microwaves?)

    So I unscrewed the drive and tried to remove the shiny, smooth platters. Unfortunately, I couldn't loosen the screw holding them down, so I tried to bend them by levering the screwdriver under the platter.

    It was then that I learnt that the platters aren't some metal alloy, but a more brittle plastic and/or glass composite, as the sudden explosion of silvery shards, while looking very impressive, nearly blinded me. Once I knew what I was dealing with, however, I soon made short work of the rest of the platters. There's no way anyone's going to get information off them now!

    I screwed the case together, and you couldn't tell it was empty; it still felt just as heavy as before. So exchanged my empty drive with the delivery guy for the new one.

    I just hope the OEM to which the drive was returned doesn't try to run the drive in another laptop, or open it up, or is able to trace the drive back to me. That's probably wishful thinking, but no-one's crapped on me just yet, and here's hoping they never will...

    1. Re:Same for hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      So YOUR THE ONE That messed up my laptop with your broken drive!!! DIEDIEDIEDIE!!!!1111!!!11oneoneonetwotwo2

    2. Re:Same for hard drives by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that not all platters are made of a brittle material. In the past I've destroyed drives by hitting the platter with a hammer, shattering them. But the last drive I tried this on had proper metal platters. The best I could do was to bend 'em out of shape.

  73. Like any thing else it depends on ones paranoia by My_guzzi · · Score: 1

    Like any thing else it depends on ones paranoia factor ...

    I seldom have old personal hard drives to dispose of that have any value. Being a bit of a pack rat I keep things past their useful lifetime. The last batch of hard drives I junked I think the biggest was 10 Gig. I just put them in the drill press and run a 3/8 drill bit through the whole thing about half way of the centerline of the spindle. I am going through another in house upgrade and will probably wind up with 3 or 4 80 gig drives in the junk box. They will probably just sit around in a drawer (with the 16 MB parity memory stick that I paid $500 for ) until I get over it and junk them also.

    I have built systems for a few poor friends with old parts including drives from my junk box, I usually just format them and then copy an image onto it. These systems will probably get trashed from viruses / worms / mal-ware in a few months anyway. (Windows)

    I had a drive die and sent it back to the manufacture. I just had to choose between my investment and the possibility of an intrusion of my personal privacy..I guess nothing is free.

  74. DBAN works with SATA by raitchison · · Score: 1

    DBAN does indeed work with SATA drives, at least with my few months old Dell.

    I believe it was a fairly recently added feature at the time.

  75. What my HS left on drives by s7726 · · Score: 0

    I used to get computers out of the dumpster form my HS. They made no effort to erase the drives. A couple of them had been used by the school psychiatrist to write reports on students that I went to school with. If I'm not mistaken that's supposed to be relatively confidential.

  76. DO NOT DESTROY STORAGE THEN "DONATE" by magarity · · Score: 5, Informative

    or just destroy the item in question
     
    Nooo!!!
     
    I worked as the technology re-use manager at a nonprofit organization whose mission was to get donated goodies, including computers (my responsibility), to small local charitable organizations. Our warehouse had pallet upon pallet of donated computers whose hard drives were removed as part of corporate donors' policies regarding data safety. Did we get those computers to community centers, adult education programs, inner city kids, etc? Heck no, we had to send them to the metal recycler for 2 cents per pound. Sure, per-storage unit hard drives are cheap but to get enough for a couple of hundred computers is a major expense. And yes, we applied to Maxtor, Seagate, IBM, HP and a couple of others to try to get them to donate hard drives but no dice.
     
    The late-middle aged lady who wants to type and print the church newsletter has ABSOLUTELY no use for a computer without a hard drive and even less of an idea how to install one even if she did have budget to get one. Get a commercially available eraser program; there are plenty of titles and methods. Said church lady has NO IDEA how to extract prior data from a drive that was just plain formatted and a fresh Windows installation put on.

    1. Re:DO NOT DESTROY STORAGE THEN "DONATE" by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      You can buy 2-5 gb hard drives on ebay in volume for a few dollars apiece.

      --
      resigned
    2. Re:DO NOT DESTROY STORAGE THEN "DONATE" by Technician · · Score: 1

      The late-middle aged lady who wants to type and print the church newsletter has ABSOLUTELY no use for a computer without a hard drive and even less of an idea how to install one even if she did have budget to get one.

      Unfortunately most charities will not make any promises that the PC will be donated to said lady. It could end up anywhere. As such most company policies regarding data destruction will remain in place. A deleted drive looks the same as an un destroyed drive to the shipping clerk. A PC missing the drive is a no-brainer to the shipping department that the data is not there.
      Most companies don't want to take the entire department cast off stack and take the time and space to set up 200+ machines to wipe them. It's just simpler to stack them and remove drives and then place them on the done pallet ready to ship.

      Removing the drive does not have the task of using a table, connecting things, loading software, waiting for the process to finish, etc. A dock jockey with a screwdriver is much faster and the results are reliable.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:DO NOT DESTROY STORAGE THEN "DONATE" by DrSpirograph · · Score: 1

      With the low price of storage devices, the latter (destruction) is probably preferable
      ...and with the environmental cost of land fill, the former (sensible erasure policy) is much more preferable.

      Hmmm, let's see, slashdot's audience consists of how many readers now? And the disposal of how many hard disks would they have control over or a say in?

      The amount of waste that was promoted in that one sentence is left as an exercise for the reader.

  77. Drive Wipe and Degauss by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

    First we do a 6 pass writing 0's and 1's alternately, then a random character write. Once this is done, or if we can't do a drive wipe, we then run it 4 passes through our degausser. This degausser causes the drive to make some pretty noises while going through it. I can only imagine what's happening to the heads/platters. One of our techs learned the hard way that you remove ALL jewelry, watches, keys from your person before degaussing. His watch stopped working and had to be replaced. If it's a drive we are trying to replace under warranty, we then send it in. If it's denied because degauss destroyed it, we take it as a loss. We don't mind.

    --
    But why is the rum gone?
    1. Re:Drive Wipe and Degauss by Technician · · Score: 1

      If it's denied because degauss destroyed it, we take it as a loss. We don't mind.


      If it still works after degaussing, be afraid. Be very afraid. Head positioning on most drives is done by reading interlaced servo tracks. If the servo tracks did not get erased, neither did the data.
      Do not trust the degaussing to delete your data by itself. Data is destroyed only when the Servo track is also destroyed making the drive a paperweight.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  78. How does one confirm stuff is gone? by Pengunea · · Score: 1

    I'm curious as to how I might be able to tell that things are really "gone" off my hard drive.

    Not so much for the "be sure before sending it to the computer parts recycling program so nobody swipes it" aspect, much more for the "unstable/mostly borked hard drive that had an accidental formatting done on it with some files I'd really like to get off there but don't want to pay a ton to have forensically removed".

    --
    Starkle, starkle, little twink.
  79. Re:It's easy to get strong magnets by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    seriously doubt that any magnet you can get your hands on would erase anything from a hard drive platter. Even bulk tape deguassers from five years ago won't do shit on a modern drive. It takes some seriously strong fields to erase a platter.

    How strong of a magnet are talking about??? It's actually quite easy to get strong magnets. The irony is that they are in every single hard drive. So yeah if you do ever take apart your hard drive remember to get those neodymium magnets. They are expensive as hell and are really fun to play with.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  80. IBM DeathStar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The suggestion at the end of the story is to get a professional forensics firm to wipe your data or just destroy the item in question."

    All mine were IBM DeathStars.

  81. Good OSS solution by jridley · · Score: 1

    http://diskzapper.com/
    Ten pass high security erase (not DoD compliant, but very good), linux based, on either floppy or CD boot. I've been using it for a couple of years and keep copies around to give to friends at work for when they're selling PCs.

    Make sure your friends realize that it wipes EVERYTHING, even partition and boot records, and the "restore" area that many manufacturers put on the drives these days.

  82. You have to do it a bunch of times by vlad_petric · · Score: 1
    I would basically alternate passes with the same character - 00s, ffs, f0s, 0fs, 75s, 57s, and throw some random passes in between them. Finally, urandom is better than random, as it doesn't block when it doesn't have entropy.

    Why do all this ? Because just one pass doesn't truly erase data, it's still recoverable with advanced hardware

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:You have to do it a bunch of times by chill · · Score: 1

      I would basically alternate passes with the same character - 00s, ffs, f0s, 0fs, 75s, 57s, and throw some random passes in between them.

      If I may ask, isn't this just wanking? If you're that paranoid, why bother? Just belt-sand the platters, smash 'em and toss it in the trash.

      Running thru a 5-7 pass wipe like you say on a 200 Gb hard drive will take, ummm... a LONG time.

      Hard drives also make very good pistol targets, if you live out in the country.

        -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:You have to do it a bunch of times by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      I read that the real fun to be had is to hook up a lawn tractor battery and get the drive spinning, THEN use it for target practice.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  83. Re:Hah. Try Dell refurbs. by Pneuma+ROCKS · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, that's what you did.

    --
    Favorite quote: "
  84. Disposable storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing leaves my hands without being disabled--CD's, DVD's, HD's, you name it. The simpler and more dramatic the data neutering process, the better, if only for therapeutic value.

  85. Mac OS X has a decent answer to this by Bobartig · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you go into security options from Disk Utility, there's a click box for "zero out all data", "7 times zero", and "35 times zero", depending on how sensitive your data is. It even warns you "this will take 35 times as long as a single erase.

    --
    This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
  86. Re:Use the military procedure for destroying the d by markana · · Score: 1

    Just ship it via UPS marked "Fragile"....

    The physical destruction will be total.

  87. Hard drives are mostly aluminum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...so get yerself a big glass or porcelain pot or container big enough to hold the drive completely submerged under liquid. After shooting your old hard drive full of holes at the range, take what's left of it and put it into the glass or porcelain container and cover completely with concentrated muriatic acid (hydrochloric acid) you can buy in the swimming pool section of Lowes/Home Depot/WalMart/etc. Wear proper eye and skin protection and don't let any of the liquid splash on you. In a short while, there won't be much left of the drive except for some black goo.

    For extra credit, you can also try out a little bit of "Having Fun With Hydrogen".

  88. Hard to know by dereference · · Score: 1
    But does that destroy the data? Did you check that on anohter key?

    That's a good point, and checking with another key wouldn't even help to determine this. You might manage to fry only the I/O circuits, while leaving the storage core intact. I don't know exactly how these devices work, but it's quite possible all the data could be recovered by a simple hardware swap of subcomponents.

    1. Re:Hard to know by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      ou might manage to fry only the I/O circuits, while leaving the storage core intact.

      In that case it does not prove anything.
      But it could also be that it remains accessible but reads as garbage, or all zeroes or ones. That could mean the actual memory is erased or destroyed.
      Of course it does not guarantee the same thing happened on the original key.

      It happened to me with a harddisk. The disk became defective and I wanted to return it under guarantee. But what would happen to my data?
      Fortunately it was a mechanical failure. The heads were broken off, or somesuch. The drive scratched when spinning. I think it has simply been discarded.
      With an electronic failure they could simply swap the electronics board and read it.

      Moral: use encrypted filesystem. When the disk crashes, the data is worthless and there is no need to overwrite etc.
      Same can be used on USB key.

  89. that MPEG with your partner in bed by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I knew I forgot to erase something before tossing that disk! Now its all over the InterNet.

  90. Anyone with minimal programming skill.... by rubberbando · · Score: 1

    Anyone with minimal programming skill and a compiler can just write a small (less than 10 lines of code) to just start writing random characters to a file until the drive is full.

    I have seen it done many times in college. People did it with VB, C/C++, and even COBOL. But then in their cases I don't think it was intentional (ie. Infinate Loops in there file writing proceedures).

    So anyways, just delete everything on the HD and then run one of these programs. Besides wiping out all of the data, you might even crash the hard drive pretty bad too. :P

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
    1. Re:Anyone with minimal programming skill.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course that wont be enough to stop file recovery tools

      you need to actually wipe the drive (at least 7 times).. that is write data to every sector on the drive 7 times

  91. I'm not too worried... by Obliviously · · Score: 1

    "The suggestion at the end of the story is to get a professional forensics firm to wipe your data or just destroy the item in question."

    So are these the same "forensics experts" that were thwarted by the user using Firefox instead of Internet Explorer (previously mentioned on Slashdot).

  92. I had a nice read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a really good deal on an iMac from a church sale. Needless to say, the teenage daughter didn't erase her diary. Brian was a lucky guy.

  93. Here's an idea.... by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Two ideas, actually...

    Idea #1 - include a floppy-based "erase HD" tool with all new computer purchases. Yeah, kinda dangerous in the wrong hands. "What does this disk do? Ooops."

    Idea #2 - get this same tool into the hands of charities and others that accept discard PCs and encourage them to use it.

    Idea #3 - include a preloaded, industry-standard encryption-key USB dongle with new computers, and encrypt every drive to that key. When you give away the computer, keep the dongle. As a bonus, mom and dad can take away Jr.'s computer by taking away the dongle, and corporations can "lock up their computers" when not in use.

    #2 is probably the most practical to impliment quickly.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  94. poor article by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    suggesting a professional forensics team can wipe your hd beyond anyones ability to read it is very poor. if they ARE pro's then they will just say, no, it can't be done. the only safe method of hd disposle is a blow thorch.period.no if's or buts.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  95. There can be only one way to be sure. by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    No, it's not "Nuke it from orbit"
    It's a good old fashioned sledge hammer.
    The from orbit option sounds better, but I don't want to be on the watch list.

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  96. once you open it... by Edzor · · Score: 1

    once you open the case and break the airtight seal, how much damage does that do to the recovery?

    1. Re:once you open it... by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      Little to nothing, actuallly. For a brief while, the "latest case-mod" thing was to open up the harddrive (remove the cover), then mod the cover to add a window to see the heads move and platters rotate. The smart modders used older drives, and tried to do a "clean room" system by getting a bathroom steamy (to trap dust particles), letting the steam die down, then performing the surgery (a few others tried to build mini-cleanroom-boxes as well - with HEPA filtered air systems and such). Some of these drives actually lasted a while without crashing or corrupting - a few months in some cases. I think the fact that you don't see clear hard drive covers for sale (though they do exist for demo/sales units put out by hard drive manufacturers) kinda tells you that it wasn't as successful as some would have liked. But it wasn't a complete disaster, either...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  97. Re:Use the military procedure for destroying the d by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

    and of course,
    5a) Lable Shipping container as "Fragile!"

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
  98. I really deleted their data before I sold them .. by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    format /X C:
    easy to do, ain't it ?

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  99. apt-get wipe by joeflies · · Score: 2, Insightful

    eom

    1. Re:apt-get wipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $ apt-get wipe

      E: Invalid operation wipe

      ITYM 'apt-get install wipe'. TYVM. HAND. EOM.

    2. Re:apt-get wipe by Seehund · · Score: 1

      Scrub will do the job as well.

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  100. You don't seriously think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that the manufacturer of a USB pen drive will actually spend any effort to replace parts and repair one of these that's sent in defective do you?

    At least not on one that's smaller than 2GB anyway. It's just not worth the labor. They throw them away after accounting for them on paper for the write-off and just keep making new ones on the assembly line. Just handling all the warranty return and accounting paperwork costs them too much already, so I seriously doubt they'd waste any more labour to try to repair a throwaway device.

  101. Re:Use the military procedure for destroying the d by Captain+Jammer · · Score: 1

    6.) Put a JTS Corp. label on the drive

  102. destroying the drive is not a great option by mr.dreadful · · Score: 1

    considering the amount of toxic crap already in our landfills, do we really need to destroy a drive? How many of us actually have data that is worth retrieving off a drive that has already been wiped? The "it doesn't cost much to just replace it" mentality is going to bite us in the ass eventually.

  103. too bad, use shred by GerritHoll · · Score: 1

    A Dutch attorney (Tonnino) once threw away a PC without erasing the data. Too bad for him, it had not only sensitive information, but some child porn as well. He should have used shred to destroy at least the evidence...

    1. Re:too bad, use shred by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      Surely the prosecution didn't get a conviction on a discarded drive? Any comptetent defense attorney could argue that anyone could have had custody of that drive between the time it was discarded and the time it was analyzed!

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  104. just trash it? by hazem · · Score: 1

    Well, from a short-term economic point of view, it's probably best to do as you say, and just trash the drive.

    In the longer term, you really should let the drive be used (wiping it), or make sure you recycle it. But, even if you destroy it and recycle it, you're making less use of the energy resources used to create it. Meaning, suppose it took 1000 joules of energy (pulling a number out of my ass) to make and transport that drive, and you trash it after 3 years, when it could have run for 6, you've just reduced the efficiency of the use of that 1000 joules in half.

    I know it doesn't seem like much, but as energy is starting to cost more, I think it's wise for people to consider the total cost of what they are doing.
    I knw

  105. Re:Use the military procedure for destroying the d by JoshWurzel · · Score: 1

    USPS: When it absolutely, positively, has to be destroyed overnight.

    Yes, I know this is from a Fedex advertisement.

    Alternatively, replace USPS with your (least-) favorite carrier.

  106. apt-get life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eom

  107. I also found data by spoco2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I also bought a second hand computer, from an auction from a company that had gone into receivership, I got it home, turned it on, it wouldn't boot... I fiddled with the internals a bit and low and behold it booted and came up into Windows XP... well, I don't know the passwords, so I then just boot of a Knoppix Live CD and have free reign to look over the entire hard drive, of what turned out to be a PA's computer, complete with photos of the vehicle parts machine plants they were building right up until they went under...

    The saddest part was looking through the 'Recent Documents' list.

    Letter x, letter y for boss, travel iteneries etc... then... typing tests... job guides, and finally the resume...

    So sad... I wiped it good and proper before I gave it to who it was intended.

  108. Article pulled off old reported HD was it :/ by zenst · · Score: 1

    This article about data left on storage devices is churned out by the tabloids least once a year, if not twice. Its one of there staple fjear factors they like to inflict upon joe public whilst trying to educate them. Despite the fact joe public cant remove a HD let alone sell it with all there bank account details on ebay.

    Ironicly there are companies that will garantee to destroy all your data on your old HD's and I personaly would ove to make money from taking drill bits to discs.

  109. No! by runner_one · · Score: 1

    Is anything good enough for the paranoid?
    NO you will never satisfy some people.
    Did a job today where a sysadmin has 2 hardware Firewalls back to back both doing NAT and the system does not even store any financial data.

  110. Perfect solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I save up old disks that need to be "securely destroyed". When I've got a good stack, I go out to the range with the glock or ar-15 and fill 'em full of holes. Most of the time the platters shatter into itty bitty pieces. The ones with just a few pretty looking holes go back and sit on my desk at work.

    Fun, thereputic, and effective

  111. Re:Why Bother? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

    So would it piss you off if I told you my company (I work, not own) regularly "donated" computer stuff to avoid the recycling fees the city charged?

    Now, we have a shared building and we dump it in the dumpster under the other companys' garbage.

    Or just put it on the curb, some loser always grabs it.

    (note, the city just this week lifted the fees so they will be properly recycled. but at $35 a pop, F the city landfill they can mine it for metals in 100 years)

  112. Physical destruction is the way to go by Badmovies · · Score: 1

    I loved what the old DOD instruction said. It was something to this effect:

    "In an approved facility (EG, one with cement floors) and wearing proper safety gear (EG, goggles and hearing protection) strike the hard drive repeatedly with a heavy object (EG, a sledgehammer) until it is totally crushed."

    I still use that method of destruction today. Heck, the Marines love it when you tell them to take the hard drive out back and attack it with a pickax.

    --


    Andrew Borntreger
    Champion of cinematic disasters
    1. Re:Physical destruction is the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sounds like you might be a member of this group of people

  113. Single drive of raid 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a raid 5 array consisting of 2 data drives and one parity drive, what is the possibility of recovering data and/or images from one drive? Is it 1/2 of the stripe size, ie: 1/2 of an image or document if the entire document fits within the stripe size? Or 1/4 of an image or document if the entire document is twice the stripe size? Or is it impossible to recover anything due to the way raid 5 works?

    Debating whether to warranty a drive with mission critical data on it, or just bite the cost of a new drive over the risk of the warranted drive being lost in transit or repaired and sold as used by the manufacturer.

  114. just a suggestion: cd boot and usb key by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    you can get usb keys a lot cheaper than hard drives and CDR media is extremely cheap nowadays.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  115. Wasting time overwriting drives by gui_tarzan2000 · · Score: 1
    Just take the platters out and use a grinder on them. There's no way to get date from them if the substrate isn't there anymore.

    --
    Have you hugged your penguin today?
  116. Always use PRNG wipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't use the DoD wipes or similar. Just use PRNG any modern hard drive. Modern as in one you could hook up to your IDE or SCSI controller. Other wipes on these kinds of hard drives are the equivalent of PRNG anyway. Might as well save time and actually use a real PRNG algorithm to do it.

  117. Sledgehammering technique by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 1

    An important fact that many hard drive sledgehammerers miss is that the drive should be placed on its side - so the platters are vertical.

  118. Mobile phones, too by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    I bought a mobile phone (actually a smartphone) off ebay a couple of months ago.

    Left on the phone were...

    • a full contact list
    • passwords for several online banking sites;
    • passwords for a couple of other finance-related web sites;
    • passwords for several phone services;
    • enough personal details to impersonate the person. :-)

    What they did wrong was not only that they sold the phone without resetting the settings. They also failed to use the built-in feature where you can encrypt the sensitive information.

    About the only thing they did right was to sell it to someone who wouldn't make use of this kind of information.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:Mobile phones, too by dances+with+elks · · Score: 0

      Similar thing happend to me, can I add leaving pictures of kids and friends to your list.

      --
      Will wash cars for karma
    2. Re:Mobile phones, too by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah. These guys even had a short recorded video on it, it was great. Nothing perverse, though.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    3. Re:Mobile phones, too by dances+with+elks · · Score: 0

      I had just one video clip, which appeared to be a pair of (female) nipples fighting! I kid you not.

      --
      Will wash cars for karma
  119. Let's look at this from the other side of the coin by StormKrow · · Score: 1

    How do you get the data off the drive? Everyone wants to say what you can and can't write to a drive to "zero" it. I'm curious to see how they would get this information off, does anyone truely know, or are we still guessing?

    --
    Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
  120. Re:Use the military procedure for destroying the d by Technician · · Score: 1

    2) Use acetylene torch and reduce drive to slag.

    Outdated thermite also works. Thermite demonstrations were the best part if working in a classified area.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  121. Microwave Safety. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Nothing will happen to the microwave if you put metal objects in it.

    You still shouldn't do it though.

    If you put in a metal object, the object will get very hot. It will not look hot until you reach in and burn yourself trying to remove it. Then it will still not look hot, but you'll know better because of the burnt flesh stuck to it.

    If you put in a metal object that has lots of sharp edges, (such as crinkled up aluminum foil from your hat) it may spark. while it gets very hot.

    If you put in a metal object with something flamable (say, aluminum foil rolled up with a paper ball full of grain dust) maybe you could start a fire. if you left it in for a long time. you will probably still be able to use the magnetron after the fire, but the electronics are sure to be toast. (and the carbon scoring will not make the interior very appetizing)

    If you insist on putting a hard disk in the microwave however, make sure ot remove any metal coverings. a solid conductive enclosure is almost opaque to radio so the case would get very hot and nothing would happen the platters.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  122. Re:Why Bother? by ahaning · · Score: 1

    If they were good machines, then fine. If you no longer needed them, then they were not really "good". If the schools asked for them, fine.

    If they were bad machines, you've shifted the cost and burden of having them disposed by dumping them on a school. (And hey! TAX BREAK!) Either way, you've shifted the burden of disposing them (the school will have to throw them away eventually) from your company which, more than likely, makes more money than the school that is too poor to buy their own computers. That's a pretty crappy deal.

    As for the losers that go dumpster diving, that's cool. They want it, they can have it.

    --
    Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
  123. Mobile Phones are a big problem to... by dances+with+elks · · Score: 0

    I recently bought a new phone on ebay and the muppet that sold it had left all his phone numbers and pictures of his baby on there!

    --
    Will wash cars for karma
  124. Biased? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like a fairly useless article considering this was a forensic's lab that SPECIALIZES in recovering data doing this "study" on data recovery.

    "If users were worried about potentially sensitive data, said Mr Steggles, they should use a professional forensics firm to erase it" - article
    Yeah, thats not biased or promotional in any way.

    "With a little work, it was possible to reconstruct almost everything that some users did online, and to grab cookies and login details for sites they visited." - article

    Considering they do this for a job every day, you wonder how much work the average joe would need to go through to get said data from a purchased used drive? Sounds like a load of paranoid bull intended to freak out people with threats that some one is going to take all your personal information when you sell that old hd on ebay.

  125. must destroy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The suggestion at the end of the story is to get a professional forensics firm to wipe your data or just destroy the item in question. With the low price of storage devices, the latter is probably preferable."

    Who wants to buy my used storage device? In great condition and only slightly destroyed...

  126. The military mandates stripping the drives by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    The military mandates the hard drive or other permanent storage media be removed.

    This is a legitimate site. I mourn that it's gone to a contrator because at the local DRMO it was easy to pick up cool stuff.

    It's all run through here now and no computer will have a harddrive.
    http://www.govliquidation.com/

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  127. That's almost large enough... by trigggl · · Score: 1

    That is almost large enough to put a Linux or BSD distro on. I guess a person could buy 2 and split folders on different partitions. Better yet, get 3 because at least 1 out of 3 is going to be a rip off.

    --
    Ops, I shuld have usd the prevuwe but in.
    1. Re:That's almost large enough... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      A 'BSD' distro, for example, NetBSD, has a userland that's about 350 megs. That's a base X11 and a full binary userland.

      Then you start adding packages and source code you want.

      It's NOT the bloated mess than Linux distros have become (Slackware on two CDs... *grumble*)

      A current NetBSD base will install comfortably on a 600 meg drive and give you all the tools to compile in anything else you want.

      --
      resigned
  128. Encryption vs Steganography by cciRRus · · Score: 1
    The third is the use of cryptographic file systems.

    Hmmm... wouldn't it be better to use a steganographic file system like StegFS? In the case of encrypted data, authorities may have the legal power to force you to surrender your decryption keys to the encrypted data. Now, if had used a steganographic file system, they wouldn't even know that your data is there on your disk!

    --
    w00t
  129. Steganography is overrated by brokeninside · · Score: 1
    It does have a time and place, but not as often as many people would believe. Bruce Schneier makes the point succinctly:

    Say the secret police arrest you and start going through your hard drive. You've got a bunch of pornographic pictures on your hard drive, so you've got a decent cover story. But you've also got the steganographic program on your hard drive, so the secret police are suspicious. They might try to download the same pictures from the net and look for the telltale differences that indicate a hidden message. Or they might just assume that you've got some messages hidden somewhere. Steganography: Truths and Fictions


    In your example, the court could as easily order you to explain the steganographic system as they could order the keys to the cryptographic system. The difference being, that unless you use cryptography within your steganography, that anyone who figures out where to look can figure out your unencrypted data in a steganographic system.

    BTW, systems such as StegFS are cryptographic systems at heart. They use steganography to hide the fact that the encryption is there, but their strength is the fact that the data is encrypted, not that the data is hidden. The data being hidden just makes it harder to unencrypt.
  130. Not All Government Agencies Screw Up by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised. Really I am. At the large fed TLA where I work, data destruction is taken seriously. We're an all-WinXP (for users) shop, so our default file locations on our standard disk images (there are almost *no* non-standard images in use) all use EFS. Machines to be discarded are run through a standard 7-random-overwrites procedure. Any machine with even the slightest atypical response will have the drives removed, physically dismantled, and destroyed. Our local guy responsible for this is building a giant sculpture made of platters and magnets. Every platter goes across one of those massive magnetic drive-killer machines (you know, the ones with all the scary warnings about not wearing your watch while you use it and keeping uncontrolled metal bits at least 8 feet away) before it gets added to the pile. Over the last couple of years, it's gotten too big to lift and, yes, we know we'll eventually have to send it for meltdown but it sure is funny to watch the pile grow.

    Data destruction is easy. There's no excuse for any govt agency to screw it up.

  131. Knoppix Solution by WolfRune · · Score: 1

    I forget the exact command, since I haven't used it in a while, but there's mention of a command in the book Knoppix Hacks that will overwrite everything in your hard drive with random data, and then overwrite all THAT data with 0s. Sounds like a pretty darn secure method to me.

  132. Knoppix + Shred = (erased) by shadowsurfr1 · · Score: 1

    The default shred command in knoppix is better than dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda in my opinion. To start, shred will show you progress and what it's overwriting the data with (random, zeros, etc). Second, you can specify the number of times it rewrites the data. All formatting is also erased.

    Simply enter the following command:

    sudo shred -n 2 -z -v /dev/hda

    This shred command will overwrite the drive twice (-n 2). Random data to start (defalut), zeros to finish (-z). The -v tells you the progress on the drive.

  133. How? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Did you have to disassemble the drive? Very likely, as reconstructing data requires examining the platters with special hardware.

    If you didn't, then by definition it wasn't really zeroed - the drive's firmware lied to you if it said it was.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  134. Next time show them to your Congressman by davidwr · · Score: 1

    That should get some attention.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  135. Bootable CDs by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Disk-less computers with bootable CDs a la Knoppix make great library-kiosk computers.

    They also make halfway-decent home computers if they are configured to support writable USB media and/or the user won't be storing anything bigger than a floppy.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  136. Re:Why Bother? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

    I work for a non-profit that has a student computer lab. I'm the one that's gotta check out the donated machines. You're absolutely right. It's kinda like that old joke of waiting till a bank teller's not looking and dropping a handful of change into their drawer; you'll cause them hours of repeated fun-filled recounts just by giving them thirty eight cents.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?