Slashdot Mirror


Blog Software Smackdown

An anonymous reader writes "With published numbers saying there are approximately 70,000 new blogs being created each day, and the total number of blogs doubling every 5 months, it's no wonder that everyone and their dog is wondering whether to setup their own blog for a chance at fame, or perhaps a book publishing deal. The question then becomes: What software should you use? SitePoint has just published The Blog Software Smackdown which takes a look at Movable Type, WordPress, and Textpattern. Pick one, and take your stab at fame or notoriety."

294 comments

  1. iBlog by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd should put in a plug for iBlog from lifli software. After trying a few blogging software packages over the past three years or so, I have standardized on iBlog for my site. If you run OS X, iBlog is one of the easiest packages out there that allows a fairly decent degree of flexibility. I chose it because of the ease of hosting images from my photography and media files along with the minimal time required to manage and back up the entire database. My time is getting extremely valuable these days and the less time I have to spend managing a blog package, the better.

    Interestingly, it is amazing how much traffic and the variety of opportunities that have popped up from posting to a blog. There have been invitations to give talks, queries for visits from folks like Adobe and Apple, requests for images to publish and purchase etc....etc...etc... Additionally, blogs serve as a means for professional contacts to get to know a side of you that never really appears in a professional setting. For instance, a couple of potential investors have found my site and a common dialogue about photography certainly helped smooth early meetings out a bit.

    I never would have thought about these possibilities as the blog was originally simply set up to communicate with friends and family. I hate the term, but the "Web 2.0" is starting to fulfill the promise of the Internet back in the late 80's. With a blog, publishing becomes relatively straight forward such as the quirky children's books that I just posted. Granted, the signal to noise ratio is going down with increased blogspace traffic, but search engines have realized where the growth is and will help with that over the next little while. Now if we could just get rid of the spamblogs....

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:iBlog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not the blog-software that is gay. It is the user.

      No software in the world can turn random gibberish and pseudo-journalistic attempts into something someone wants to read.

    2. Re:iBlog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please, just shutup.

      am i the only one that hates blogs? all i ever see in google is search results from some moron posting his opinion on whatever it is im searching for.

      you're not a journalist, noone cares about your dog, and certainly noone wants to hear about day at school.

      do us all a favor and keep it private kthnx

    3. Re:iBlog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      My time is getting extremely valuable these days and the less time I have to spend managing a blog package, the better.

      Yet you still waste your day away posting to slashdot like the rest of us with devalued time.
    4. Re:iBlog by pvera · · Score: 3, Informative

      iBlog is only good if you are an occasional blogger. Once you have more than two dozen posts it becomes unmanageable because it is 100% static HTML. This means that if you have 50 articles and you change the template you are forced to upload all 50 articles again, plus supporting files.

      What you want is something simple like Wordpress. Wordpress 1.5 already uses the nofollow tag, so you don't have to worry about comments spam. Whoever tries to auto spam you is not going to get any advantage out of it. All you have to do is once a month or so check your list of comments and delete whatever you don't like.

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
    5. Re:iBlog by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      am i the only one that hates blogs? all i ever see in google is search results from some moron posting his opinion on whatever it is im searching for.

      slashdot is a blog.

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    6. Re:iBlog by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      am i the only one that hates blogs?

      Yes, you're the only one. No, wait - It's actually a cliched response that appears in the hundreds every single time a story mentioning the word "blog" appears here. Keep on thinking that you're individual though.

      all i ever see in google is search results from some moron posting his opinion on whatever it is im searching for.

      And that's a blog problem how? Bitch to Google about that if you have a problem with it, or try other search engines. Stomping out legitimate long-tail content because you don't like it is extraordinarily egotistical and selfish.

    7. Re:iBlog by Iron+Clad+Burrito · · Score: 1

      ...and grandparent is a moron posting his opinion.

    8. Re:iBlog by TGK · · Score: 1

      I started bloging in February of 2004 and, at the time, I wasn't really happy with any of the bloging software packages out there - so I wrote my own. I'm not claiming it's iron clad, and it's certainly not for everyone but as it turns out, writing your own isn't all that difficult.

      I had problems with blog spammers for a while, but implementing even a simple captcha system solved that problem.

      Over all, I really enjoyed the project. I think I spend a lot more time writing for my blog because I know the software is something I built and so I have more invested personally in it. If you find yourself looking at the offerings out there and don't really feel all that happy with any of them, I strongly recomend trying your own hand at it. Blog software isn't all that hard to write and having total control over the engine makes the whole site more personal.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    9. Re:iBlog by pvera · · Score: 1

      I did that too, a few years ago (before "blog" hit the mainstream". It is a great way to appreciate how much work is needed to ship even a rudimentary application. I am in awe of the people that keep xoops, wordpress and others running.

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
    10. Re:iBlog by melikamp · · Score: 1

      It is well known that real men use vi.

    11. Re:iBlog by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I do wish that Mac people would think to mention that software is Mac-only when they endorse it, so the rest of us won't waste our time evaluating it.

    12. Re:iBlog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re-read the post. You did not read carefully as he DID say that is was for the Mac only.

    13. Re:iBlog by pvera · · Score: 1

      Crap, forgot to post the URL of my old (and crappy) home brew blog app: http://openvp.sourceforge.net/

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
    14. Re:iBlog by rbaf · · Score: 1

      I like zoomblog.com :-)

  2. "Smackdown" by panxerox · · Score: 1

    I looked at that title and said, ok oh cr*p the government is going to regulate blogs like they have been talking about doing. Then doing something I rarely do, I read something other than the headline. I guess we get to keep a modicum of freedom of speech for awile longer.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
    1. Re:"Smackdown" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's the difference between a Smackdown and a Crackdown.

    2. Re:"Smackdown" by AlexTheBeast · · Score: 1

      The real "smackdown" should be that most slashdot users should be able to craft a pretty nice blog out of php and mysql alone. This isn't difficult stuff to do. The best I can tell that's what most big sites like tech-recipes do.

      Even if you are going to use one of these blogging tools, why limit yourself to the default code. You are the most geeky of the gurus! Hack the crap out of that code. These are in easy php code. Use their work as a building point... and rip out your own version of it.

      What the heck has slashdot come to?

      ATB

    3. Re:"Smackdown" by MiKM · · Score: 1

      Why develop new software if mature FOSS can be used instead? As for modifying the code, you don't rewrite something just for the purpose of rewriting it. You rewrite it if its is broken/doesn't meet your needs. If you want a new interface, change the interface. If you want new functionality, write a plugin (or find one that suits your needs). Just because many people here COULD write a browser or word processor instead of using Firefox or OpenOffice doesn't mean they should/want to.

    4. Re:"Smackdown" by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Why develop new software if mature FOSS can be used instead?

      To keep your skills sharp. Why does this even NEED to be asked?

      --
      -mkb
    5. Re:"Smackdown" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess SitePoint doesn't know the difference between a "showdown" and a "smackdown." Less power to 'em.

  3. MSN Spaces (of course!) by srain · · Score: 3, Funny

    http://spaces.msn.com

    You know you love it...

    1. Re:MSN Spaces (of course!) by ScottyH · · Score: 1

      Um...no.

    2. Re:MSN Spaces (of course!) by Valacosa · · Score: 1

      The only people I know who use MSN Spaces are from my tiny Canadian hometown up North and are, for lack of better words, technologically retarded.

      I can't even use any HTML tags in comments! How stupid is that? At least Blogger lets me use the <i> tag!

      --
      "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
  4. blog fame by Device666 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They would be better if they would read slashdot all day. Fame is such a small thing.

  5. Slashcode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Slashcode count as blog software? Are there any meaningful sites out there that run slashcode?

    Just wondering...It seems the number one open source cheerleader can't get it's own open source software to be more widely deployed.

    1. Re:Slashcode? by Musteval · · Score: 5, Funny
      Are there any meaningful sites out there that run slashcode?

      I can think of one...

      --
      Note to mods: I'm probably being sarcastic.
    2. Re:Slashcode? by codergeek42 · · Score: 1

      Ok so it runs SlashCode. That doesn't make it meaningful. :>

    3. Re:Slashcode? by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      Oh! You must mean http://slashgoth.org/. Totally indispensable!

      --
      Be relentless!
    4. Re:Slashcode? by fishdan · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the hugely popular Sportsdot. Not that it makes much sense to run a sports site, and then try to lure slashdot readers over there.

      --
      Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm
    5. Re:Slashcode? by Kieranishere · · Score: 1

      I believe Techdirt runs Slashcode. IMHO, they are a meaningful site.

  6. look.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i think we all need to set up a blog to talk about the blogs that are being set up so frequently.

    then we can set up blogs that talk about the blogs which talk about the blogs being set up so frequently.

    until then, nor myself or my dog will be happy.

    -Sj53

  7. Livejournal? by Donniedarkness · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Is there anythign wrong with Livejournal? I'm not a big fan of most of the blogs there, but the interface is really easy to use... The article doesn't mention any negatives to it...

    And I've also gotta mention Xanga here... I HATE Xanga, but a lot of kids that I know have learn HTML because of it.

    EXAMPLE OF WHY I HATE XANGA: http://www.xanga.com/capntomakeithapn

    --
    Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    1. Re:Livejournal? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't get it either. LJ is an open source site, use and make a lot of intresting software and has some fantasticly helpful people on it. Yet for some reason people focus on the little kids whining there.

      --
      I like muppets.
    2. Re:Livejournal? by haluness · · Score: 1

      Amazing! Seems that there are unexplored depths of stupidity!

    3. Re:Livejournal? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The worst thing about these idiot self-actualization blog fanatics is that they don't even understand who uses blogs. Blogs aren't your venue to fame and fortune, and the vast majority of bloggers are perfectly fine with this. They just want to post something that their six friends are into. Sometimes, they just want to say something for themselves, like in a paper journal.

      Livejournal is filled with 13 year olds blathering about nothing important. And it's my favorite site on the internets. If it's good enough for jwz...

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:Livejournal? by Kelson · · Score: 1

      The service or the software?

      The services is mentioned early on in the list of hosted services. But the review is of software someone might use for a self-hosted blog, and it seems to me that creating an LJ clone* to power a single person's journal is kind of overkill.

      *I'll admit I have no idea what it takes to install the LJ server software. For all I know it could be a 5-minutes install like WordPress, or it might take three days.

    5. Re:Livejournal? by OakDragon · · Score: 1
      Is there anythign wrong with Livejournal?

      My God! It's full of emos!

    6. Re:Livejournal? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      How old is LiveJournal? How many of these self-hurting teens have grown up and gone for interviews at corporations only to find the ubiquitous google search on their name leads to a big flashing warning sign? More amusing, how many of these enjoy-cutting-themselves princesses are the daughters of elected officials?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:Livejournal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ability to read your friends list entries with one click is the feature that puts LJ far ahead for me. LJ is more of a social phenomenon than Blogger etc.

    8. Re:Livejournal? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They typically say that livejournal started in 1999, but there are some posts in the dev's journals from December 1998.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    9. Re:Livejournal? by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

      For that matter ... what about Slashcode?!? Or Scoop, which powers Kuro5hin and DailyKos?

    10. Re:Livejournal? by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      It can take quite a while. It's a powerful, complex piece of software.

    11. Re:Livejournal? by superflyguy · · Score: 1

      That doesen't mean you have to have anything to do with the emos on Livejournal, and the friends page is amazingly useful. If I have to put up with the chance that I'll accidentally find an emo once a year in exchange for being able to see in a single glance what's new in friend's blogs, I think that's worth it. And no, an RSS agregator is not a sufficient alternative to the friends page.

    12. Re:Livejournal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you hate Xanga?? Compared to some of the sites on there, the one you've linked is a thing of design beauty.

    13. Re:Livejournal? by dkh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      mod_perl is often a deal breaker

    14. Re:Livejournal? by SamSim · · Score: 1
      the interface is really easy to use

      I found it horrifyingly counter-intuitive. Why, for example, is it that on your default journal page, right after you create it, there is no link which allows you to write a new post?

    15. Re:Livejournal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on what you want to class as the start. What eventually became LiveJournal started off as a small CGI script which could talk to a desktop client for Windows written in MFC. It got more fancy when BradFitz allowed his friends to play. It was quite a while before it started attracting people that had no connection to BradFitz at all.

      It should also be noted that BradFitz and some others have retroactively imported content from their older sites into LiveJournal, so the date of the first entry in these journals is misleading.

    16. Re:Livejournal? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not like the majority use their real name, just like here on Slashdot. Whether that's intentional to avoid being found, or just because they like a fancy nickname, they result is the same.

      The few that do are probably more likely to be "out" about anything that they do, or careful to keep things non-public if they don't want people knowing (it's easy to restrict posts to certain people on LiveJournal).

      It's not like this is anything fundamentally new - consider when DejaNews came along, and suddenly all your obscure Usenet posts from ten years earlier were available for all to see.

    17. Re:Livejournal? by MadMoses · · Score: 1

      How old is LiveJournal? How many of these self-hurting teens have grown up and gone for interviews at corporations only to find the ubiquitous google search on their name leads to a big flashing warning sign?

      There's an option to disable seaching in your LJ blog, then you can't search it with the LJ search engine or for instance blogsearch.google.com.

      Of course, you always have the option to make posts friends-only.

      Wanna try out if someone on /. has an LJ? Just have a shot at http://www.livejournal.com/users/SLASHDOTUSERNAME

      --

      Do not be alarmed. This is only a test.
    18. Re:Livejournal? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Uh, did you notice that the article was evaluating blog software, not blog hosting services?

    19. Re:Livejournal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is. Journal->Update.

  8. MS IIS C# .NET Blogging software ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    anything out there for the non-php/apache crowd ?

    1. Re:MS IIS C# .NET Blogging software ? by nxtw · · Score: 4, Informative
      There are a few.

      DasBlog
      BlogX
      tBlogger
      .Text

      There may be others.

    2. Re:MS IIS C# .NET Blogging software ? by Effika · · Score: 1

      Blosxom is pretty good for a 17k perl script. It's getting a little dated, but the next version (v3) is usable although still in the testing stages. Have a look at their Yahoo mailing list (linked from the Blosxom website) to see what's going on with it.

      I use v2 of the software and have no qualms, although I wouldn't mind a larger list of plug-ins.

    3. Re:MS IIS C# .NET Blogging software ? by arose · · Score: 2, Informative

      And if Blosxom appeals to you, but you're more of a Python person there is also PyBlosxom.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    4. Re:MS IIS C# .NET Blogging software ? by stevenharman · · Score: 0

      Since you mentioned .Text (dotText), I thought I'd point out the subText Project, which is nearing it's initial release (expected in December).

      Subtext is an open source project licensed under the BSD license. It is a fork of the popular .TEXT blogging platform.

      --
      90% of being smart is knowing what you're dumb at.
    5. Re:MS IIS C# .NET Blogging software ? by AtomicGator · · Score: 1

      Community Server is a widely used blogging software written in C#. It also has photo galleries, file galleries, and message boards. CS is the successor of .Text and is what powers Microsoft's MSDN and TechNet blogs.

  9. pLog / LifeTYpe by shri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sort of disappointed that they did not consider pLog / Lifetype in their smackdown. I've found that to tbe only really usable multi-user system. It is critical for blogs to evolve into community platforms and not just remain as platforms for individual egos. Imagine starting a blog on a given topic and attracting 5 visitors a day... (isnt that the max for ego blogs?)? Now imagine letting those 5 visitors start their own blogs and attracting 5 more visitors a day.

    That is an ego/ecosystem. Sorry ... no single user blogs for me please.

    1. Re:pLog / LifeTYpe by nine-times · · Score: 1
      I'll take your mention of an online community to go off-topic and ask a question of my own. I've been trying to find a way to make a particular site, and not being a programmer, I've been hoping that there'd be some open-source software that would let me make it.

      The idea is pretty simple, which is to have something like slashdot, i.e. a mix between a forum and a weblog. Threaded discussions and all. However, The big idea would be to have it mostly be a private deal-- members only can read/write/discuss. On the other hand, I'd still like for members to be able to choose any post of their own that they like, and specify that it's public. Each member would then have a weblog, which would basically be a collection of their public posts. Ideally, I'd like everyone to be able to have their own style for the blog-- at least a different style sheet. Oh, and I'd like users to be able to upload pictures as well.

      Does anyone have any idea on how to do this? Any software, any collection of plugins? Anything close? The closest I can find are plugins that allow you to have a single login for both phpBB and Wordpress, or something like that, but I'd like to have it be primarily community/discussion-based, multi-user, with blog posts automatically being visible in the discussion area. I might need to write my own, I guess, but I'm not a programmer, so I'd like a shortcut.

    2. Re:pLog / LifeTYpe by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One very awkward solution to this is to download and install Moodle. Moodle is a freeware LMS. It allows you to grant priveledges to various users, restrict those privelidges to within particular 'courses' allow people to password protect the courses or only allow certain people into their course, move comments, make quizzes that save to a database, collaborative wiki pages, etc.

      There's probably a more elegant solution, though.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    3. Re:pLog / LifeTYpe by shri · · Score: 1

      Easy solution is to get on rent-a-coder type sites and find someone who can code a bridge for you and keep the userid/passwords in sync.

  10. Nanoblogger by zecg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sheer elegance is nanoblogger. Truly minimal, console-friendly and GPL licensed.

    --
    .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    1. Re:Nanoblogger by cperciva · · Score: 1

      Sheer elegance is nanoblogger. Truly minimal [...]

      Funny you should say that. When I looked at nanoblogger, I decided that it was far to complex for my taste (both in terms of volume of code and the number of unwanted features), so I wrote my own script instead.

      I don't consider nanoblogger's 1295 lines of shell script, 1230 lines of CSS, and 325 lines of html templates to be "minimalist". I do consider my own 176 lines of shell script, 80 lines of CSS, and 108 lines of html -- in total, half the size of the GPL license -- to be minimalist.

  11. On the Internet... by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nobody knows if you're a blog.

    1. Re:On the Internet... by rssrss · · Score: 1
      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  12. What about... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

    Serendipity? It even has a shiny "HTMLarea" option which is WYSIWYG, which is even more 'humane' than this Textile doohickey.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  13. I've used... by under_score · · Score: 4, Informative
    ...three methods: plain old html/css, Movable Type, and Blogger. Each has distinct advantages and disadvantages:
    • POHtml/css: ultimate in flexibility for layout and publishing. Pain in the butt to update and maintain.
    • Movable Type: good balance between flexibility, built-in dynamic features and maintainability. Irritating to keep up-to-date for software versions, and a little slow for some of the dynamic features.
    • Blogger: easiest to use by far. Nice integrated anti-comment-spam. Not very flexible in comparison.
    For comments and trackbacks I use HaloScan. For pinging blog trackers I use Ping-O-Matic. I don't run any blogs that are super popular, but my Agile Advice blog has a good niche following with about 300 hits/day after six months of development. I've used Movable Type as a CMS system for my consulting/training web site too. It is flexible enough that I can make it do what I need for site layout, permanent (non-blog) articles, and the blog features are mostly turned off, except for publishing news items/announcements. I'm not a layout or graphics prodigy so I like the fairly simple default layouts provided by MT.
    1. Re:I've used... by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      I don't run any blogs that are super popular, but my Agile Advice [agileadvice.com] blog has a good niche following with about 300 hits/day after six months of development

      (Score:4, Informative)

      Of course you realize that by observing this, on slashdot, you have proven your statement (temporarily?) false...

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  14. What about Drupal? by ultralame · · Score: 4, Informative

    OK. So it's a CMS. But it works great as a blog and is OSS. I have recently switched to it on my server, and it seems to handle everything better than Wordpress (I had a lot of spamming problems, and could never get the anti-spam additions to work). With drupal, I have had no problems with it or any of the modules I have installed. drupal.org

    1. Re:What about Drupal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, too, used Wordpress before migrating to Drupal. At the time I used Wordpress (summer 2004) it was really buggy, it couldn't even handle slashes properly (they would disappear and they didn't fix that bug for quite a while, not good for a tech blog). Also, Wordpress didn't have a good way of organizing the site (categories). Wordpress is better now from what I see.

      Drupal is rock solid, though not everything I want is out-of-box, and took some setting up. I had to install a module for trackbacks, and modified an existing module for easier commment/trackback approval.

    2. Re:What about Drupal? by zootm · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had a lot of spamming problems, and could never get the anti-spam additions to work

      Try using this for Drupal, if the problem comes up again, I've been using it for a while and it's excellent.

    3. Re:What about Drupal? by fak3r · · Score: 1

      Also 'Bad Behavior' clears almost all spam attempts BEFORE it gets a chance to post. Works perfectly and stopped me from moving away from Drupal after spam got out of hand. http://drupal.org/node/30501

    4. Re:What about Drupal? by phlegmgem · · Score: 1

      I've been using Jeremy's spam module for quite a while now. Great stuff! BTW, here's the main Drupal project page for this module.

    5. Re:What about Drupal? by zootm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I didn't link that because it only has the download for the old version (since the new one is BSD licenced and there's some weirdness about putting those on the Drupal homepage).

  15. Money? by Aundy · · Score: 0

    It is alot of work + money to make your own blog(if its a good one at least.) I was wondering how many of these thousands of blogs actually make more money then they lose? Or do the creators only want the fame?

  16. well? which one? by cryptoz · · Score: 1, Redundant

    You can't have linear growth and exponential growth at the same time! So is it about 70,000 new ones per day, or is it doubling every five months? Since it can't be both, pick one!

    Okay, okay, so it's possible that the number is about 70,000 new/day right NOW, but that'll change very, very soon, so what's the point of even including it?

    1. Re:well? which one? by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Thanks for letting me know that I wasn't the only one annoyed by that... Although I was not quite sure if I was going to post it :)

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    2. Re:well? which one? by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      I would assume it means 70k now, yes - which is useful information. It's makes a big difference if it's doubling from 1 to 2, or from 1 billion to 2 billion, so it's useful to have some absolute values as well.

  17. 70k new blogs a day with no content by bad+jerkface · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is there any software with functionality to make the average blog worth reading?

    --
    It's a hand twinkler, you dumbass! And I got a bag of whoopass for you!
    1. Re:70k new blogs a day with no content by OakDragon · · Score: 1
      Is there any software with functionality to make the average blog worth reading?

      > /dev/null

      Well, you did say "average".

    2. Re:70k new blogs a day with no content by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Yes, some artifical scientific paper generator was discussed on Sloshdat some time ago...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    3. Re:70k new blogs a day with no content by Kombinat · · Score: 1
    4. Re:70k new blogs a day with no content by ucahg · · Score: 1

      Liberal use of the delete button would help. And less frequent use of the "Post" button.

    5. Re:70k new blogs a day with no content by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Is there any software with functionality to make the average blog worth reading?

      More importantly, does it work on the rest of the web too?

    6. Re:70k new blogs a day with no content by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      I had been thinking recently (just because it's an interesting problem) of ways to structure a political discussion site that would have no "axe to grind". Meaning, one that would rely more on application of a general algorithm rather than on policing or censorship by politically-motivated human moderators, in order to appeal to wide audiences rather than the partisan audiences that political sites tend to attract. People want to read opinions that reinforce and validate the opinions they already have, and so every political site winds up having a left or right slant. You end up with a bunch of people agreeing with each other, which is always boring. Intellectually honest debate between people of different political persuasions is rare, because the way things usually happen, true debate has to wait for a drive-by ambush from the occasional troll who ventures into a hostile forum. And trolls are rarely intellectually honest or interesting to talk to.

      In a slash site you occasionally get to rank posts and influence what everyone sees, but moderator status is relatively rare, and aside from the preferences settings (flat/nested/threaded, mod level, topics, etc.), everyone who visits Slashdot sees more or less the same thing. Amazon's page appears different to everyone who goes there. You implicitly "moderate" items (always up) by visiting them and especially by making a purchase. Everyone who visits Amazon sees something different on the front page- depending on your surfing history on the site. Amazon figures you out by what you look at and suggests similar items. It isn't obvious how to do that with a discussion site, which usually relies on the fact that the page appears the same to everyone who visits. If the page displays differently in everyone's browser, then people in heated discussions start talking past each other. They're not on the same page. So the contents displayed in an individual discussion would need to be similar for everyone who participates. That imposes some restrictions on how the moderation mechanism can work if it deviates from the Slashdot model.

      The site could maybe peg you politically, based on some metric you provide. Maybe every post you read could have links underneath it- "I agree with this post", "This guy is a bozo", etc. Then by clicking those links you give the site hints on stuff you want to see more of. The moderation could be applied not only to the post itself, as on Slashdot, but to the post's author (so that you'll see an author's posts more readily if you always mod his posts up- Slashdot sort of does this a little bit with the +1 Karma Bonus). Well-moderated posts should float up to high visibility as they do on Slashdot. But the moderation could also affect the system's characterization of you politically. Users could be mapped to positions in a multidimensional space of political viewpoints. You would be more likely to see something if it were written by someone "close" to you politically. (This seems to be what people are comfortable with.) But if it were a piece of writing highly regarded by people far away from you politically, you should see it too- so that you get exposed to the best, most well thought out opinions that seriously challenge your own.

      That would be the goal, anyway. I can think of ways to assign users to arbitrary positions in a space based on a metric like post or story moderation, but then what do you do with those spatial positions? Do you use them to filter out individual posts? Visibility of new stories or topics? Or subthreads? Possibly you could prune something as large as a subthread, but individual post filtering doesn't always work very well even on Slashdot. 20 people will respond at +1 and +2 to some provocative statement that gets moderated to -2, which is a bit confusing. The rendered HTML makes it look like all these people are yelling at the grandparent.

    7. Re:70k new blogs a day with no content by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Is there any markup language with the functionality to make the average webpage worth reading?

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    8. Re:70k new blogs a day with no content by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      I have been thinking about the same thing. Democracy seems to be dying at the moment and maybe something like this is the solution.

      National issues would seem to be the best basis, so the US would have a different server from the UK where I am. Some karma whoring is inevitable, but it would serve to remove political spamming.

      I don't think it's necessary to cater for political biases as the best arguments/lower common denominator would be most likely modded up.

      Standard slashcode might do it, but it would be worth connecting recent comments eg Clinton's comments on Iraq with the best comments on previous Iraq stories.

      With enough users, it would become a better political guide than Wikipedia, the media, government spin etc

  18. imho by rootedgimp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    im really tired of this blogging fad. there are so many blogs now, that everyone is so busy writing their blog that noone has time to -read- any of them. it seems like everyone now has something so fantastically important to say that they need to have their own site to put it online for the world to behold. give me a break. noone cares what emo cds you bought today.

    im glad that google exists, because on the rare cases that someones blog has worth reading information you can sift it out, however, in case you didn't know, google has some evil shit going on that people need to really start paying attention to. anyway, as a quick recap to my opinion -- if you were thinking about starting a blog - dont - noone cares what you have to say. (and yes, before you trolls start coming for me, that includes this message as well.)

    1. Re:imho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "im really tired of this blogging fad. there are so many blogs now, that everyone is so busy writing their blog that noone has time to -read- any of them. it seems like everyone now has something so fantastically important to say that they need to have their own site to put it online for the world to behold. give me a break. noone cares what emo cds you bought today."

      Oh, yes, this is so terrible in recent years. It's not like since the effective dawn of the modern Internet, the World Wide Web hasn't been filled with a million Geocities websites about people's cats.

      Wait - nevermind, it's *always* been like this.

      "im glad that google exists, because on the rare cases that someones blog has worth reading information you can sift it out, however, in case you didn't know, google has some evil shit going on that people need to really start paying attention to."

      Google has evil shit going on!

      Christ. Unless they're going to invade a second-world country under the guise of terrorism, excuse me while I laugh my ass off. Yeah, of all the things people should be paying attention to, Google's right up there!

      "anyway, as a quick recap to my opinion -- if you were thinking about starting a blog - dont - noone cares what you have to say."

      Why? The average weblog creator already has an audience - even if it is just their friends and family. Are you so pathetic that you somehow feel threatened by the fact that others out there have people who *do* care about their day to day lives? Or are you just some crusty Internet has-been, one of those brave souls from the early 90's who now sits around bitching about 'How it was back in the day', never leaving your dank and dark basement dwelling to see the sun?

    2. Re:imho by Dr+Tom+Danger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Flamebait or not, I thought it was funny. It's not my place to say who should or should not have a blog, but... Just as everyone shouldn't run a "website", I think we can all agree a great many of the "blogs" out there don't contribute a whole lot. Of course, you could say this in reference to ALL CONTENT on the internet as well. These days the internet is a digital playground. Let the kids play.

      --

      suck my ping!

    3. Re:imho by rootedgimp · · Score: 1
      Looks like we got a live* one here!!

      Oh, yes, this is so terrible in recent years. It's not like since the effective dawn of the modern Internet, the World Wide Web hasn't been filled with a million Geocities websites about people's cats. Wait - nevermind, it's *always* been like this.


      Well no shit sherlock, and thanks to the blogging trend it looks like we've increased the number by about 70,000 per day.

      Google has evil shit going on! Christ. Unless they're going to invade a second-world country under the guise of terrorism, excuse me while I laugh my ass off. Yeah, of all the things people should be paying attention to, Google's right up there!


      Everyone knows this war on terror doesn't pass the smell test, that isn't the point and doesn't cover the fact that people are putting their trust in google without realizing exactly what the company is up to. while you laugh your ass off try pulling your head out of it.

      Why? The average weblog creator already has an audience - even if it is just their friends and family. Are you so pathetic that you somehow feel threatened by the fact that others out there have people who *do* care about their day to day lives? Or are you just some crusty Internet has-been, one of those brave souls from the early 90's who now sits around bitching about 'How it was back in the day', never leaving your dank and dark basement dwelling to see the sun?


      You should start your own internet psychic site -- you got me!!! get some original material btw, the 'never seeing the sun' shit is getting old.

      * == blogger.
    4. Re:imho by SoSueMe · · Score: 2, Funny
      Or are you just some crusty Internet has-been, one of those brave souls from the early 90's who now sits around bitching about 'How it was back in the day', never leaving your dank and dark basement dwelling to see the sun?

      This post reminds me of the good old days when we just got this interthingy. No one had heard of Al Gore yet. We just typed away on our 9600's , which were much better than the old 2400's, by the way. We only had text on a monochrome and we liked it! "Mark-up" wasn't invented yet and when it was, no one knew how to use it. Still don't, I suppose. Anyway, there are too many young people pecking away at keyboards like chickens in a barnyard and giving just about as much information. Speaking of chickens, what are all these cowards? Cowards were yellow backed idiots who wouldn't fight for themselves or anything else. When called out, they'd just disappear. We never knew when they'd come back. Not like a boomerang. You'd always know when they'd come back. Not those USA boomerangs, but the real Austrailian ones. They were real quality....

      What were we talking about??

      Abe Simpson.
    5. Re:imho by ebh · · Score: 1
      "Mark-up" wasn't invented yet and when it was, no one knew how to use it.

      It was, but it was called troff. And we liked it.

    6. Re:imho by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      Grand-Dad?
      Where have you been? You told Grand-Ma you were just going out for a movie.
      <Ggrriinn>

    7. Re:imho by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      When I was on BBS'es, and Usenet, we'd often use _this_, /this/, and *this* as our markup. :P

    8. Re:imho by Pope · · Score: 1

      Usenetters post like _this_, Bloggers post like this.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    9. Re:imho by ebh · · Score: 1

      Speak up, Sonny! Back in my day, computers filled whole rooms, and you had to sit next to them to work on them, and they were hot and noisy and made you deaf and WE LIKED IT!

  19. Wrong Nomenclature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blog software smack downs or comparisons are to be known as "Slogs"

  20. Complaining about the options by Kelson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, it's early in the discussion (~25 posts right now), but all the top-level comments seem to fall into one of two groups:

    1. Not another blog story!
    2. Why didn't they write up my personal favorite?

    Anyone have any thoughts on the three tools they actually reviewed?

    1. Re:Complaining about the options by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot:

      3. Enumerated list of the categories of top-level comments

    2. Re:Complaining about the options by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Shut up and get back to moaning! It's a soldier's right to complain.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Complaining about the options by nine-times · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'd stay away from Movable Type. Well, let me back up and say, put a little time into your choice. You can always migrate to other software, but it probably won't be trouble free, so it's better if you can stick with the same package once you start writing.

      And it's partially for that reason that I'd advise people to stick with an open source solution. Not for philosophic reasons so much, but because you can make your own changes.

      It's not one of those things where open-source advocates talk about the benefits of being able to rewrite sections of your kernel, either. You don't need to be much of a programmer. If you're already writing your own HTML and such, it isn't much of a jump to alter a little PHP here and there.

      So if you think you might want to, at some point, dig in a little and customize your weblog, I wouldn't go the closed-source route. I'd basically say that, all things being equal, Wordpress is the way to go. It seems well-supported and feature-rich, and there's a pretty big community behind it. However, try a few out before you commit. OpenSourceCMS gives live demos of both the public and admin sections of both Wordpress and Textpattern, so try them both and make up your own mind. Hell, they're free, so you can even download them, set them up, and try things out.

    4. Re:Complaining about the options by Trax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The hangup for me with most, if not all, of the blogging software is that they have little to no support for alternate databases besides MySQL. As a consultant, I have deployed PostgreSQL in all aspects of my business from bookkeeping and web hosting to home-grown applications. As a result, it's difficult to pick either WordPress, TextPattern, or other blogging software because they rely solely on MySQL as a backend. I don't relish the thought of having to administer several different databases for different purposes ...

      I've gone with MovableType for the moment as it provides me with what I need now. If in the future WordPress (or any other solution) has solid database support for PostgreSQL I will be more than willing to switch to it.

      NOTE: I know that some individuals have ported WordPress to PostgreSQL albeit with some stability issues and without help from the core developers.

    5. Re:Complaining about the options by radish · · Score: 1

      I'm very happy with wordpress. It was an easy install, and upgrades have (so far) been even easier. There's a bunch of open source templates out there, it wasn't beyond my CSS skills to customize one to use. Performance is decent, and the web interface is pretty damn comprehensive.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:Complaining about the options by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, blogging software needs to have import and export from comma seperated text values. I switched over from Moveable type to Geeklog a while ago and the transition was pretty painful, we're doing allright again but they should seriously consider making this easier.

      We went with a minimalist presentation, and I'm starting to appreciate it.

      You shouldn't have to update your personal site every 2 months it doesn't make any sense it's way easier just to take the fact you're using build to order code in stride and concentrate on content.

      www.level4.org is my site...

      Also I've found that SpamX from Geeklog has increadible success in weeding spam, I'd perfer those random images but that's another story, we have 4 editors so from my perspective all the spam gets filtered but I'm not totally sure.

    7. Re:Complaining about the options by djfuzz · · Score: 1
      Sure - I've used two of the three. Wordpress on my personal blog), and movable type as coeditor of ajaxian. Wordpress wins out for me for several reasons:
      • any crazy plugin you can think of you can find and install very easily for WP - the community is huge and helpful
      • while neither admin UI is really that great, wordpress' is a bit more intuitive then movable type's
      • six apart is trying to run a business, more power to them, but the WP team is trying to build the best open source blogging engine first, and make some money second. it shows
      • speed of development - the WP team is over hauling the admin interface to have live preview, adding true multi-user blogs, and other neat stuff with 1.6 - from what I've read in the community the MT platform has been relatively stagnant with the 3.x versions.

      anyways, thats my .2 cents.
      - Rob Sanheim
    8. Re:Complaining about the options by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      And this:

      4. People pushing their own blog software.

    9. Re:Complaining about the options by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Roller works well with PostgreSQL, and includes scripts for initializing the databases on MySQL, PostgreSQL and HSQLDB. It is a Java web app, so once the database is initialized, any database with decent JDBC drivers should work equally well. IIRC from the mailing lists, there are even some users using Oracle and MS SQL Server.

  21. 70,000 blogs per day? by Regulus · · Score: 5, Informative

    100 of which are legit, with the remaining 69900 being computer generated google-rank link-farms....

    --
    I want to live forever, or die trying.
    1. Re:70,000 blogs per day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      100 of which are legit

      Yeah, and of those 100, maybe only 30 are worth adding to your bookmarks.

      Each day, of course.

    2. Re:70,000 blogs per day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of those hundred, maybe zero have any useful content.

  22. Typo. by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Typo is so far the greatest blogware I've seen. Was a little bit problematic to get running at first on my web host (they didn't have Ruby and Rails installed, had to build them from source), but it has been working like a dream ever since.

    It has one really good side, specifically, it doesn't depend on any particular database. I'm using it on sqlite. Few blogwares offer that as an option. (Especially if nobody really reads my blog. =)

    Has one annoying side though - relies on AJAX crap for preview when I type articles. Should file a bug report along the lines of "What's wrong with plain old preview-before-post?" one day...

    1. Re:Typo. by fak3r · · Score: 1

      Seconded, I've been running it for 2 months on my new/personal site, and I've loved running cvs head, and the mailing list/development is moving along at a nice clip! Checkout the theme contest they're running - impressive stuff all around.

    2. Re:Typo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i tried it but it was a real pain in the ass to get working with mod_ruby, which doesn't work well anyway...

    3. Re:Typo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has one annoying side though - relies on AJAX crap for preview when I type articles. Should file a bug report along the lines of "What's wrong with plain old preview-before-post?" one day...

      Developers curse frigging idiots like you. If you have a -problem- with the preview, file a bug report describing -the problem-. Bug reports are not for whining. Bug reports are for describing -bugs-. No, "coded using AJAX" is not a bug, and whining about your preferred method of coding previews is not a bug report.

    4. Re:Typo. by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Developers curse frigging idiots like you. If you have a -problem- with the preview, file a bug report describing -the problem-.

      I blame developers. That's what you get when you use bug tracking system to track feature requests. "Damn! Another whiner wants a new feature! I'd better edit Trac and remove the 'enhancement' severity from the bug reports!" =)

      And this is what bugs me about developers: According to them, feature requests are not "problems". I have a problem with Typo story editor (it pushes stuff to the server while I type, lagging it down a bit, then renders the text jerkily, and rearranges and shuffles the browser window while doing so).

      Or did it occur to you that I might actually not rant in this style in bug reports and actually write politely? as in "I think this Ajax thing is kewl to the max, but my web server logs have tons of requests to the RPC things - would it be possible to include an old-fashioned edit-then-preview system?"

      And I curse developers who don't have guts to call the users idiots without Post Anonymously checked. =)

    5. Re:Typo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The absence of a standard HTML fallback is a problem. The developer might not even realize their mistake, if every user agent they run is bloated enough for the fancy version to be usable.

    6. Re:Typo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The absence of a standard HTML fallback is a problem.

      Then the bug report should read: "Doesn't work when Javascript is disabled." The bug report should not read: "Uses AJAX". The two reports are entirely different.

      If such a bug exists and was filed, the developers could easily fix the bug by providing an HTML fallback without removing the AJAX code. However a bug report saying "Don't use AJAX" can't be fixed in any sensible way, and is likely to be marked INVALID. A perfect example of the difference between reporting a problem and kooking out.

    7. Re:Typo. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Use FastCGI instead. There is a general consensus in the Ruby community that mod_ruby should die, and die HARD.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    8. Re:Typo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you get when you use bug tracking system to track feature requests.

      Non-AJAX previews are not a feature. They are an implementation detail.

      Users simply shouldn't be asking for AJAX-this or non-AJAX-that. It's an implementation detail. Users should be reporting bugs, not concerning themselves with the guts of a piece of software. If a bug happens to be caused by an AJAX something or a non-AJAX something, that's the developers' call to make, and they can often fix it without changing between AJAX and non-AJAX. In short, complain about real problems, don't complain about non-problems like implementation details. If you do that, you are just going to be written off as a crank.

      There are in fact good reasons for using the same software to track bugs and feature requests - e.g. feature requests often depend upon a bug being fixed.

      According to them, feature requests are not "problems".

      Um, they aren't.

      I have a problem with Typo story editor (it pushes stuff to the server while I type, lagging it down a bit, then renders the text jerkily, and rearranges and shuffles the browser window while doing so).

      That's a bug. That's not a feature request. If a developer has misclassified that as a feature request, then complain about the misclassification, do not complain that they don't consider feature requests to be problems, because they shouldn't and that's not the problem you are experiencing.

      Or did it occur to you that I might actually not rant in this style in bug reports and actually write politely?

      Whether you are polite or not is not what I was criticising. I was criticising you for considering reporting a "bug" that was merely a personal dislike you have toward a particular methodology. If that methodology causes you problems, then report those problems. Don't unilaterally decide that the methodology is wrong, unfixable, and ask them to replace it.

      as in "I think this Ajax thing is kewl to the max, but my web server logs have tons of requests to the RPC things - would it be possible to include an old-fashioned edit-then-preview system?"

      Then the bug is not that it uses AJAX, the bug is that it makes lots of unnecessary and unwanted entries in your log file.

      And I curse developers who don't have guts to call the users idiots without Post Anonymously checked. =)

      I apologise wholeheartedly, WWWWolf. That is your real name, isn't it? =)

    9. Re:Typo. by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Users simply shouldn't be asking for AJAX-this or non-AJAX-that. ... Users should be reporting bugs, not concerning themselves with the guts of a piece of software.

      Note that at no point did I say "AJAX sucks, period." I said "This AJAX-based thing isn't as good as the solution we had in 1997", you know, back in dark ages when CmdrTaco unleashed his new evil minions, Preview and Submit (who, to digress a bit, are frequently mistaken for each other).

      A significant difference in these statements, in case it's not obvious, is that former condemns an implementation detail and latter identifies one of the possible causes of a larger problem, which is not an implementation detail but an usability issue.

      And yes, I know there's nothing worse than someone who thinks he knows what's wrong at one specific detail but really doesn't. But even they have helpful suggestions that may lead to significant improvements. Ultimately, very little of user feedback is utterly worthless.

      There are in fact good reasons for using the same software to track bugs and feature requests

      I hate it that despite of over a century of advances in sound recording, we haven't yet managed to record the sound of Sarcasm Flying Right Over One's Head.

      That's a bug. That's not a feature request. If a developer has misclassified that as a feature request, then complain about the misclassification, do not complain that they don't consider feature requests to be problems, because they shouldn't and that's not the problem you are experiencing.

      Ah, I see. Users are no longer allowed to say "I have an idea that might fix all these problems". Or "I think the old system worked much better than this new one". I'm supposed to file a bug report that this Grand New System designed by Fine Programmers doesn't work efficiently, wait six months, and receive a new version which has the exact same problems, manifesting in a different way, or maybe helpfully categorized as "no, those aren't bugs, they're features".

      Then the bug is not that it uses AJAX, the bug is that it makes lots of unnecessary and unwanted entries in your log file.

      I could fill two reports: "AJAX stuff floods my server log" and "Old-fashioned editor, please". Devs come with two replies, "It's AJAX, of course it does that, duh, can't fix this, buy a better log analyser" and "New feature requests out of blue, where's the bloody rationale?"

      Okay, so my problem was that I started rambling about AJAX in this example. (Do developers really read only the first sentence?) Let me rephrase the request: "Please implement an old-fashioned preview-before-post system, as the current dynamic approach has some usability issues (as detailed in bugreport number such-and-such)." (Assuming the Developers don't get whimpery when I remind them of "usability".)

      I apologise wholeheartedly, WWWWolf. That is your real name, isn't it? =)

      Sorry, I tried to put my entire full name and family lineage to the name box when I created the user account, but that was too long. As was my full legal name. Therefore, I settled for a nickname. (Even nicknames can be troublesome in Slashdot - "Ungrounded Lightning Rod" had his Rod slashed off.) Under these dire circumstances, I was compelled to add a link to my home page on the World Wide Web. You can find my real name fairly easily from there, in case you're somehow interested in that sort of thing.

  23. Write your own if you can by dindi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When you run on the same software as 2 zillion others, there will be someone smart to find a hole, than there will be 1.5zillion script kiddies and automated bots trying to exploit that hole ON YOUR SERVER.

    I respect Postnuke, PHPBB, Mambo and the rest, but sooner or later some internet shitstorm is going to hit your machine and that might cost you a lot of work, your hosting, money, lost data, upset customers ... etc..etc...etc ...

    When talking about your blog, you need something that displays your data, a search function and maybe a calendar. If you write it for yourself, you might not want a fancy editor, and maybe you do not care about a bunch of other things the Ready-to-Run softwares offer.

    Besides, in regular CMS systems I usually see very small support for custom keywords, meta tags and description, and linking methods are standardized in a way that is not very good for search engine optimization, and if you want fame, you need traffic. and traffic comes from search engines.
    Yes content is king, but some engines still use your meta tags, and care about a list of things most CMS systems (including blogging ones) do not.

    It sounds super easy, but when you start doing your own CMS you can easily spend a lot of time and still being nowhere. I am writing my own (not blogging) product oriented community site, and while it is not that big of a challange, it is extremely time consuming.

    If you make backups and run on someone else's server you might ignore all that crap, but uf you value your server you might want to use something simple, but something that is not a software 100000s are testing for vulnerabilities...

    I know it sounds a little like contra open source, and I do not mean it that way, I am just scared to use some systems that proved to be containing the same old bugs over and over, and then get exploited on a big scale.

    1. Re:Write your own if you can by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Been there done that...

      I wrote my own back in college.

      I called it MCAWS (My Kick Ass Web Slate). I hated the idea of calling it a journal or diary. Not sure where the deranged term blog came from.

      People thought it was neat, had a few readers, but I never got around to plugging in multi-user functionality. (Next on my list of user selectable themes, which was really just going in and putting in some vars based on a cookie)

      It's not too terribly difficult to replicate all the functionality found in most blogs today.

      Gosh, if I had only known that in four years it would have been such a big deal I would have finished it and made it public.

      Some time ago I pulled out the old MKAWS source and looked at finishing it up. I wasn't really moved enough to fix it so I just went with blogger instead.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re:Write your own if you can by tjr · · Score: 1
      I wrote my own weblog software, more as an experiment to learn database-backed websites than because I really wanted a weblog. I'm still trying to condition myself into actually "blogging" more... I just had a lot of fun writing the software. :-)

      I even wrote a tutorial on the key steps that I used, building it with PHP and MySQL.

      It's pretty simplistic, but functional, and it meets my needs just fine.

    3. Re:Write your own if you can by knipknap · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, I would also like to see the security of the packages analyzed. I run Wordpress, and worked a bit on it's codebase to get it running. What I saw looks quite scary, security was apparently not much considered. For example, they have globals sprinkled all over the place, which makes checking such things real hard. (Also, if somebody has register_globals switched on, it gets *really* hairy.)
      Honestly, I don't expect much more from similar other products however.

      While the article also rates the product in a category they call "Security and spam-blocking", all products, including Wordpress, are fairly highly rated (MovableType got only 3 out of five). Also, spam and security are barely related, which makes me question the value of that rating even more. I am aware that security can not be rated easily, but overall, the article does not make me too confident that they did any actual security checks.

    4. Re:Write your own if you can by dindi · · Score: 1

      pretty much enough for a weblog (did not read the whole thing as my eyes are falling out after 10 hours in front of 4 monitors) but it seems it has what a blog editor needs ...

      An other thing I might implement later, is to upload full html, and I haven't seen it in other softwares ...

      I mean if I want to use an editor to make the html and just upload it .... because when you hit post and your cookie expires, you might bang your head to the wall (depending on redirects, browser, and stuff, a logout might permanently wipe out what you wrote) ...

    5. Re:Write your own if you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone might flatten your tires, so its best to reinvent your own wheel... fucking asshat

    6. Re:Write your own if you can by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      I think there's a tendency for slashdotters to always say "code it yourself" since slashdot by nature attracts technical people. I think the vast majority of people who blog are people who see the isolation from HTML as the major selling point. They are technical enough to install, but probably not coders. The likelihood of them knowing enough on how to combat spam links and not open up any remote holes is probably lower than those who have a huge commitment to coding these on an ongoing basis. AJAX has severely upped the possible damage from CSS attacks. Having everyone write their own blog software only removes the software monoculture, removiong the amortization of cracker effort over several blogs, but making each individual blog much more insecure.

    7. Re:Write your own if you can by dindi · · Score: 1

      "Gosh, if I had only known that in four years it would have been such a big deal I would have finished it and made it public."

      ohh yess, the usual feeling :) if someone would have told me that instead of working at an ISP for nothing 10 years ago

      1. I should have just contacted a "Herbal Viagra" shaman and opened a store,
      2. should have written a blog software and wait till 3 years before
      3. should have started my own porn site
      4. should have started a dating service
      5. should have done something someone thought about before me :)
      6. should have started google
      7. should have invented Napster

      I would be sitting on tons of money and would just sit scratching my balls in peace:)

      but hey ... it can still happen :) just keep coding all day, and maybe a millionaire walks up to you and wants to share his dotcom-bubble-earned-cash 50/50 :)

      Too bad nowadays whatever you think of doing; your content, your idea, your whatever - gets copied in 2 seconds by a HUGE company who has 1000x the resources you caould affor all thru your life, or just scrubbed and duplicated

      OK, I wasn't completely serious :)

      Actually it happened that I gave up on something and went with postnuke, but after rewriting almost everything I used, I had to realise, that 90% of the stuff is things I do not need, and just started writing something less of a bloat with what I really need ....

      Oh did I have to mention that the PnPhpbb got hit by some warm adn there was a proxy running on my server in a very short time? Thanks to firewalling they could not send SPAM thru.... but it made me think and start to migrate on my own creation ...

      More on that: whatever crappy code someone writes, when it comes to breaking into a website it might turn out that most go for the well-known CMS systems because you have to find one hole and you get 10k bots, while figuring my messed up code (without seeing it) might get you as many as I have -> maximum a few servers.

    8. Re:Write your own if you can by dindi · · Score: 1

      "Someone might flatten your tires, so its best to reinvent your own wheel... fucking asshat"

      Wow ... besides NOT being a moron, you should also take notice of the fact TIRE != WHEEL

      Must be my english, but I am not familiar with the expression "ASSHAT", where I came from there is no such device being used for our bottom parts.

      On the other hand if reinventing the weel was not sometimes the right choice and done by many serious and respected programmers or big corporations, probably you would be typing that on VMS on a text terminal, Dos 1.0, or punching holes into a card ..... (your choice where you think writing something different became "reinventing the wheel" in the history of OP systems.)

      Oh did you forget that slashdot runs on a CMS (a blog system as well) and was written in the need of not having anything satisfactory at the time?

    9. Re:Write your own if you can by dindi · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but don't forget this:
      I wrote - if you can - and I meant, if you cared, if you could write one, if you had the time, if you wanted to (random challange, too much time, self entertainment or just learning e.g. php&mysql a fun way)..

      Running your own stuff does not mean more insecure, there are millions of virii out for windows not just because there are security problems, but because there is one potentional target on most office and home desks...... a good virii can hit millons of targets, as a common CMS can be exploited on thousands of machines.

      I also meant (maybe did not mention) that a blog software, when single user, can be satisfactory with an entry box, no fancy editor or spellchecker, no calendar or comment option... in that case any IT student in first grade could write his own software as a homework project, and if written well, could be satisfactory and safer than tons of modules that are just there to exploit, but not even in use ...

      besides it is /. "news for nerds" and it is nerdy enough to hack a weblog together and say "I wrote that crap, it's ugly, has few functions, but I wrote it because i enjoyed it"

      I also did not say: hey don't use blogger, or whichever else, they are cool I am sure, they were cool the last time I checked them..... but I choose to run stuff on my server I can see thru, even if it looks like poo or works like poo ...

      But peace, I understand your concern, and you are not forced to write your own ... I cannot write my own op system, so I use the one I can do the most with, and still would say :
      you need a simple OS (mean simple_os for e.g a microcontroller) and have pleasure in writing one; go for it ....

      It's like I can take my bike to the mechanic for an oil change, but I do it myself so I am sure the thread is not ripped out of the oil plug screw by someone who cares less than me ....
      so I say it to my friends all the time : it takes 15 minutes and then you know how to do it.... so if you can (want) I sugggest you do it .....

    10. Re:Write your own if you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      asshat
      n. Vulgar Slang pl. asshats (sz)


        1. One whose head is in one's ass, thus wearing their ass as a hat.
        2. A person, of either gender, whose behavior displays such ignorance/obnoxiousness that you would like to make them wear their own ass as a hat.
      1. You.

      Jackass.
    11. Re:Write your own if you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look asshat, don't come back at me with your tire/wheel semantics. The fact is suggesting writing your own system as a form of defence against script kiddies is just fucking stupid. There are worms that affect Linux; are you suggesting I need to write my own operating system?!

    12. Re:Write your own if you can by cgreuter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It worked for me.

      A long time ago, I vowed that I wouldn't blog unless I did it on software I'd written myself. I did so mainly because I kept getting hoarse from yelling "It's just text and angle brackets" at every breathless article I read about content management systems and this was my own personal extended-middle-finger toward the whole web-hype industry.

      And over all these years, I've kept my vow. I still don't blog.

    13. Re:Write your own if you can by dindi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, too bad it did not appear to me that I was the ignorant asshat...

      It appears to me that besides liking to be an ass behind an "anonymous" you are quite familiar with wheels, well tires.

      Actually some people reinvented the tire with quite a success and many times, just because someone or something was constantly puncturing it.

      There came the tubeless, the self inflating tire solutions, and finally some people started hacking their tires and there came a solution of multiple inner tubes or multiple inner tube bubbles in a tire (for quads and bikes)..

      I am sure, that reinventing the actual wheel or tire is also a totally useless thing.

      I appreciate your completely reasonless attack on my comment, it servers as good entertainment, and makes me understand more why I enjoy using my reinvented wheel without a "comment on" feature.

    14. Re:Write your own if you can by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      Mine may be crappy, but it has the best name of any blogging software out there: Pheme.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    15. Re:Write your own if you can by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Must be my english, but I am not familiar with the expression "ASSHAT", where I came from there is no such device being used for our bottom parts.

      I beleive the etymology of "asshat" comes from "wearing one's ass for a hat," from which one can generally deduce the location of the subject's head.

    16. Re:Write your own if you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, that was a different AC ... man, you really are an asshat

    17. Re:Write your own if you can by dindi · · Score: 1

      I would kindly appreciate if you did not call me an "asshat".

      Besides that, it would be also reasonble from you to actually let the rest of us know if there is any reasoning why you think that 1million computers running the same software isn't more of an inviting for people with bad intention as opposed to one site running some super simple stuff, stuff that only one person might have access to, stuff that has no more functionality that the certain individual needs to establish (e.g. a blog for some might be a list of item title,short description, link to full post)

      Here is a brief summary of "security through obscurity" form Wikipedia
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obsc urity

      "In cryptography and computer security, security through obscurity (sometimes security by obscurity) is to some a controversial principle in security engineering, which attempts to use secrecy (of design, implementation, etc.) to ensure security. A system relying on security through obscurity may have theoretical or actual security vulnerabilities, but its owners or designers believe that the flaws are not known, and that attackers are unlikely to find them."

      As you can see (if you actually read it) that some people prefer this theory as an added layer of security to their different systems.

      On the other hand I am not sure that it is worth my valuable time to discuss my security theories with someone who is called "anonymous" and who is repeatedly calling me somehting I did not know existed before ....

      Linux, well you should not reinvent the wheel, someone did that for you before, and as I see you are quite happy with that and so am I.

    18. Re:Write your own if you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, I'm an application security specialist for a very large financial institution. I'd like to suggest you re-read that article about security through obscurity. Hopefully you'll come to the realisation that those people who believe this adds a layer of security are at best mis-informed.

      The whole section on security through obscurity in your comment should have been posted as a reply to your comment indicating that such as an approach is commonly known as ineffectual and should be avoided at all cost.

      People in the security space use the term 'security through obscurity' often followed with a chuckle and the phrase, 'but seriously...'

    19. Re:Write your own if you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to see that guy put his Application Security Specialist HAT on ...

    20. Re:Write your own if you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touche, my hat goes off to you.

          ***
        **O**
          ***

    21. Re:Write your own if you can by saskboy · · Score: 1

      The "Fear of the unknown hacker" is one reason I like my current method of blogging which is simple HTML editing, and no scripts to upload changes.

      I'm thinking of switching though, so I can offer RSS feeds and update through email for instance.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    22. Re:Write your own if you can by dindi · · Score: 1

      I agree with you mostly, that it should not be the first barrier or defence, or should not be treated as a "security measure".

      My argument was about commonly used systems and the way they attract more attackers in todays internet community.

      I think we do not have to argue on the fact, that if you crack 1 of many thousand systems running the same code, you technically have a good chance of being able to crack those systems.

      Now if you code your own, you are at least not exposed to widely known exploits, and don't fall with the rest of the sites.

      That is all I meant by posting the wikipedia article, I won't run OS/2 on a bank system because no one is usung it anymore, especially not as a security measure,

      but I might want to develop a custom application because I do not want to run the same stuff 1000 crackers are testing day by day to be able to attack multiple sites when they find something.

      I was also mentioning "coding what you need" and not using someone else's function-stuffed unneeded modules add to security. (e.g. you don't run telnet ona box if you do not need it).

      In a way it is security by obscurity and in a way on certain systems or in certain situatins it will add to the security of your system....

      I did not work in a "large financial institute" but worked at quite a few places where security was super important,

      Sometimes we ended up developing this and that just to avoid running on software that repeatedly got exploited ....

      And in my interpretation it is "security thru obscurity" and if you write it right it will make a difference.

      And again: I won't plug in a 10 year old unpatched cisco firewall PIX just because no one hacks it it's so old ....

      Am I completely wrong if I think that it is less secure to run a software that is tested for holes by hundreds day-by-day to hijack computers by the numbers? Especially when it is not needed? When I can sit down and write my own, following my own taste and sense of security?

      Especially with such a small application what we are talking about?

    23. Re:Write your own if you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand where you're coming from and I agree with you on some points, such as not deploying a full blown system that includes a dozen features you don't want or use, that's just part of the lockdown of an application. But I see that as making the right choice of 'product' rather than a 'build vs buy' scenario (even if it's free).

      A problem I see in my Organisation is the perception that by building a new application from scratch, we can avoid all the bugs that were in the previous 'similar' application. What they don't appreciate is that 1.0 applications always have bugs in them, both security holes and feature bugs.

      Being out in the wild and being used is what hardens applications. Sure they had a lot of bugs over their lifetime, but they are known bugs. They are fixed bugs. At worst they are bugs that someone will fix.

      Take a look at The OWASP Guide if you want to get an idea of what you need to cover if you intend to build it yourself and mitigate all potential security holes. The table of contents alone is six pages long.

      Black Hats (as distinct from AssHats ;-) aren't necessarily going to conform to your sense of security. I don't mean this as inflamatory, but people who aren't security experts don't have a clue about the kinds of things attackers can hone in on. If someone wants to crack your homegrown site there is a slew of things they can try that your typical web developers don't consider.

      If one of these 1000 crackers finds a security hole in one of these open source applications, the majority of the time one of the 10,000 hackers fixes the problem within a day or so. It is only the people that don't keep their patches up to date that are vulnerable.

      The question is, can you meet that kind of pace on your own application? Your argument has its place, but personally I would never try this. I would find an open source application that most closely matches my needs, to avoid having all the extra features I don't need, and then contribute whenever any security holes are identified. At worst my changes would be peer reviewed. At best someone who knows a hell of a lot more about it can fix it better than me.

    24. Re:Write your own if you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The question is, can you meet that kind of pace on your own application?

      Of course not - he's an asshat!
    25. Re:Write your own if you can by dindi · · Score: 1

      Agree, I will eat myself thru that guide, but I am too tired to do anything that requires me to stare into a monitor for now....

      On the patch issue I completely agree, that those who do not patch might fall,
      however when a software is not for commercial/company use you might end up being on vacation (or away for a few days) - as opposed to a company where you have 24hrs people administrating, and watching security forums/news etc ....

      It happened to me that someone placed things on my server thru a common CMS, before any advisory came out (they were precompiled linux (and even windows) binaries, and did not run on the BSD box) ...

      hmm i feel it also has to do with "let's attack what is most common", so at the end even running bsd provided "security thru obscurity" even though BSD is OSS....

      anyway I am falling asleep, so goodnight ....

    26. Re:Write your own if you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll call you what I like, asshat.

      Security through obscurity may have some validity when applied to an already secure system as a means of diffusing the results of bots scanning for particular systems (the ol' "call your .PHP files .HTML" trick). But the that security dude is right - writing your own system and hoping that its obscurity will somehow serve as a primary means of defence is dillusional.

      Here's a simple analogy, in case your butt cheeks are blocking your ears. The army doesn't drive around in VW Beetles with camouflage paint on them, hoping for the best. They drive around in armoured tanks, and add the camouflage (aka: security through obscurity) as means of reducing the risk of detection.

    27. Re:Write your own if you can by Cylix · · Score: 1

      That is one of my few gotchas in life.

      Like anybody else, I've had more then a few good ideas and some of them I've almost brought to full implementation. My good stuff usually gets gobbled up for work because they pay me to do it. I'm sure that is the story with many others as well. They simply exist to feed the machine, but I can't really complain since the machine takes care of me.

      Life teaches us to be opportunistic, but the real trick is striking at the ground that has gold beneath it.

      I'm not too terribly worried, I already do well enough, but if I can finish my next non-work project I think I'll at least land some tasty street cred (oh and maybe a couple of support contracts)

      Like I say to everyone and their mother, "Can you build or possess a time machine? No, of course not... it's a rheotical question. So if you can't change the past then why worry about it so much?"

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    28. Re:Write your own if you can by Juergen+Kreileder · · Score: 1

      I also doubt security is a high priority task for the WordPress developers. The last few security fix releases were done quite silently. No announcements on release mailing list, no notes on the main WordPress site -- just posts on the development blog which didn't even mention what was broken and who might be affected. (See WordPress Security Annoyances).

      Nevertheless, I'm running a modified WordPress version on my site. Admin access is only possible via SSL with a known certificate. (Setup described at Securing WordPress Admin Access With SSL)

  24. Re:Nobody cares about you by nbert · · Score: 1

    Hey, even if no one reads it it's a good mental exercise to write about yourself. You might argue however, that in some cases it's better not to publish it, but that's a different story...

  25. Re:Nobody cares about you by pebs · · Score: 1

    and unless you have any reason to think otherwise you shouldn't be blogging in the first place. It'd be more beneficial for the vast majority of these 70 thousand daily people to read some books and improve themselves as opposed to rotting in self-decay / worthless mental masturbation.

    Same goes for posting on Slashdot.

    Personally I publish to get information out there for the search engines to index (mainly software development and other computer related info). I've found tons of useful information in other developer blogs, so I might as well do the same. It's also nice to be able to refer people to a blog entry or refer back to it for my own purposes.

    --
    #!/
  26. Serendipity by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

    I've been using Serendipity for almost a year and a half, and I love it. I first started using it because it was the only F/OSS blog software that supported Postgres (I refuse to install MySQL on my server), but I quickly grew to love it.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    1. Re:Serendipity by Strepsil · · Score: 1

      Pretty much the same reason I started using it. Database neutrality is hard to come by these days, is a shame.

      Although, even if it _required_ MySQL, I'd still think about using Serendipity. It's a pretty nice piece of work.

  27. Re:Slashcode? Yes? SlashGISRS.org? by Lord+Satri · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are there any meaningful sites out there that run slashcode?

    I'd like to believe so. http://slashgisrs.org/ - we're trying to be pertinent and useful. But since we're less than 2 months old, we don't have the readership /. gets. But we still have 6000 daily hits :-) It's very specific: for the geospatial community out there.

    Normally, you can find other slashcode projects there: http://www.slashcode.com/sites.pl but this part of the site is down since the last slash-css update.

    slashcode is *hard* to correctly install and setup. But it *is* a great tool once everything runs at a steady state :-)

    Cheers!

  28. The real question is, by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    which one supports genuine unfettered free speech?
    I mean TRUE FREE SPEECH, no matter who it offends?

    You find one that fits that ticket and get back with us.

  29. Re:Nobody cares about you by Moofie · · Score: 1

    What business is it of yours how I spend my time?

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  30. Re:Nobody cares about you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flamebait? I dont think so, this is a good point. Just because these people can publish that they had a really rotten experience with a hangnail today, should they? This blogospheric crap is like hair in the drain, clogging the search engines with useless crap. BLAHg is more like it.

  31. I like the personal touch... by tktk · · Score: 1
    Instead of blogging, I just mass email my friends links from Slashdot and http://www.boingboing.net/

    So basically just links about technology or Hello Kitty.

  32. Blog? Blech ... by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    I've never read more than the first sentence of a blog before turning my attention to something wortwhile.

    It's a psychological release for the writer, not actually intended to be read by anyone.

    As a rule, people who lead interesting lives don't blog.

    1. Re:Blog? Blech ... by amitola · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they sure a bunch of losers. Not contributing a damn thing to society, just uselessly wanking about how much their dog ate and why their friends from high school don't write. Serious people only get their news and information, from trusted, reliable sources.

      Seriously, what the hell is it about blogging that inspires such hatred in some people's hearts? Too many of you guys got ex-girlfriends with Livejournal accounts?

    2. Re:Blog? Blech ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do you mean ex girlfriends?

    3. Re:Blog? Blech ... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      As a rule, people who lead interesting lives don't blog.

      Of course not; people with interesting lives spend their day reading and posting on Slashdot!

  33. hmm by ImTheDarkcyde · · Score: 1

    Land Down Under (LDU) has always suited my needs for personal blog sites, it's easy to set up, even has a blog edition!

  34. Re:Nobody cares about you by Seumas · · Score: 1

    Then write it in a journal. Don't go downtown, take a can of paint and spray paint all of your mundane, boring, random thoughts and daily life notes on the sides of buildings for all the world to see.

    Every thing you have doesn't have to end up on the internet. "Blogs" should not make people famous. Blogs should be interesting if the person is already known for something. For instance, I might enjoy reading the insights of a person with some notariety in their chosen medical profession. Becuase they're already interesting.

    What little spat Felisha is having at school with her boyfriend and her ex boyfriend and her ex boyfriend'ss new girlfriend or her suicidal poetry and half-assed slutty pics posted to try and garner attention to her blog are not interesting and not worthy of being put on the internet.

    Again - not every person needs a daily blog on the internet fo six billion people to read. If you need to work through your thoughts by writing them down - OPEN UP A TEXT EDITOR.

  35. e107 easily by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

    e107 is easy to setup, completely free, has a built-in forum, has a ton of plugins, completely graphical management, and (this is the important part) a large tech support community.

    http://www.e107.org/

    1. Re:e107 easily by Qbertino · · Score: 1

      e107 is a Web CMS. Not a Blog. There is an academic difference which should be aware to any slashdotter. :-)

      --
      We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  36. Are We Blogging? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    What about the Slashcode? Now with CSS!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  37. Re:Nobody cares about you by cbrhea · · Score: 1

    I mainly started a blog to force myself to write. It's a good exercise, even if it is repetitive mental masturbation.

    My wife, family, and a few friends mainly read my blog, and that's okay.

  38. Joining the club.. by slashmojo · · Score: 1
    Another to add to the list of blogs posted here so far..

    fotopages.com which as the domain suggests is a foto blog and has some nice features.

  39. typical iBlog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sunday 11/13:

    My friend tried again today to get me and help him reload Windows XP on his Taiwanese stamped steel dust bucket , AS IF !! We're going to the mall today to try out something, something big! But you'll have to wait until tomorrow to find out what I am talking about.

    Monday 11/14:

    I had a big poop today that really hurt. It must have been from eating that 1/4 pound of Grape Nut Vindaloo. It was like launching a rocket, like an old Saturn IV, huge, and firey.

    I promised yesterday I had some news for you today. I think my iPod looks best on my new Bill Blass belt. I tried the left side and right side, and while each is bold and different, I think left side, mounted sideways is the look I want! I tried it out for about 1/2 an hour yesterday just walking around the mall and got a lot of looks.

    1. Re:typical iBlog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Overrated. You are just parasitizing off of the parent post because he was first post. If you go to his blog, you will actually see that there is a considerable amount of science, and beautiful photography. Far more useful and informative content than 99% of blogs out there.

    2. Re:typical iBlog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Get your ass to RealMacSoftware and get a real tool: http://www.realmacsoftware.com/ RapidWeaver IS the blog tool that Apple should have in their iLife package. Or, possibly, the one that they WILL have in their iLife package. ;-)

  40. Paid support and free software do mix. by jbn-o · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the article:

    Because it's free, paid support is not available [...]

    Actually, there's nothing stopping anyone from supplying paid support for any GNU General Public Licensed program, including WordPress. And such paid support can be available but not widely enough advertised for most people to know about it. The relationship the author is getting at here is simply not true.

    1. Re:Paid support and free software do mix. by Arandir · · Score: 1

      The relationship is true, because support is not available! That fact that the GPL isn't getting in the way of setting up such support is beside the point, because the real point is that there isn't any!

      If you step back a few feet you can see how silly your argument is:

      "Support is not available."

      "But it could be!"

      "But it's not."

      "But it could be!"

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  41. cmsmatrix.org is where you can check them all out by SensitiveMale · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.cmsmatrix.org/

    You can read reviews and scores of over 100 blog types and can even compare up to 10 at a time.

    A very handy and thorough site.

  42. Appropriate article title by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    I vote we put a smackdown on new blogs which at the current rate of creation will outnumber the species which creates and reads them. I have one. Just one. I swear. I hardly use it. But come on... I know people with three or four. Saying nothing of value four times over... So mostly like the congressional record... Never mind...

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  43. B-B-B-Boring by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Blog == diary put on the web.

    I personally can't stand blogs simply because the vast majority of people lead superficial and annoyingly shallow lives.

    "like totally tina said 'pshaw' and I was like no way and she was like 'uh yeah!' and I was totally like 'talk to the hand' and she was like about to burst a tear it was HI-lar-rious!"

    I find some developer blogs interesting but that's only because I want to see what PRODUCTIVE shit they're up to [and occasionally there are tidbits of funny shit].

    I'm not trying to say people shouldn't put their diaries online [er.... blog]. I'm saying big fucking deal.

    Where's the newstory about 1990s geocities webpages? I had one! Am I famous? Do you like me yet? Same shit, different name, different decade.

    Didn't care about people then, still don't now.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  44. fame? notoriety? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    And here I was thinking that people blogged for their own amusement.

    Maybe I'm just not hip enough, but I think some people might be a bit too cynical and think there must be some profit motive behind every act of the online citizen.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:fame? notoriety? by cyborg_zx · · Score: 1

      Well the question one has to ask is how many people do you really want to hear about?

      I think I'm probably one of the old guard in that I don't assume anyone should give a crap about my life. The one's that did started blogs. And now they're popular everyone wants a slice of the pie.

      I guess it's just a symptom of our society that our worth is dictated by how many people 'love' us.

      How else does Pop/American Idol get any air time?

    2. Re:fame? notoriety? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      You what? Being interested in other people's lives is hardly a new phenomena. I believe they used to call it "gossip". The internet just made it possible to rant on about yourself without people running for the door. Kinda like one too many pints at the local.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:fame? notoriety? by cyborg_zx · · Score: 1

      I didn't say otherwise. The point I am making is just HOW MANY can you possibly be interested in? Thousands? Tens of thousands? The scale is dizzying. --signed, an old bastard of 24 years.

    4. Re:fame? notoriety? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Maybe you'd like read4me. It uses bayesian filtering on the server to choose which articles you're likely to enjoy. You train it by rating it's performance or clicking on titles that interest you.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  45. I like Sparkpod by christurkel · · Score: 1

    I like Sparkpod
    http://www.sparkpod.com/
    Clean, simple, $25.year

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
  46. Livejournal previews lie. by jbn-o · · Score: 2, Informative

    Livejournal previews lie. The preview you get is not what your post will look like when it is posted to a blog entry.

    1. Re:Livejournal previews lie. by Kingfox · · Score: 1

      How so?

      I've posted with a variety of HTML, and the preview looks exactly like my post unless I'm posting a poll or ordinal list.

      What are you doing, and what is the result that you're seeing?

    2. Re:Livejournal previews lie. by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 1

      I use a "workaround": I make my entries private, then proofread them, correct all the mistakes, and only change them to public when I'm happy with them.

      -Stephen

  47. Re:Nobody cares about you by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    Wrong. My friends care about me, so they read my blog. I care about them, so I read their blogs. We do chat on the phone sometimes, maybe even a lot. But blogspace is a nice way for all of us to keep up on each others' lives (and all be on the same page) without being forced to dedicate precious phone time to "what I did this week and how it made me feel" three ways.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  48. Ya want simple? by CuratorTom · · Score: 1

    Here, PolkaDot is simple. No installation. No configuration. Just dump text files and off you go. Now go away kid, yer bothering me.

  49. Dotclear ? by Ploum · · Score: 2, Informative

    They forgot DotClear ( http://www.dotclear.net/en/ ). It's really a nice blogging tool, with a lot of plugins (I mean *a lot*) and a lot of available themes.

    Give it a try, it worth it !

  50. Death by Dekortage · · Score: 1

    Blogging is the modern digital version of a diary or journal... many people who would not keep one on paper are lured to do it online. This is actually a good thing, because it preserves thoughts and other ideas about a person that might have disappeared otherwise.

    The real question is, what happens when a blogger dies? Will someone preserve their blog somewhere for their family/friends to peruse through? Will there be a Library of Blogress where everyone's "published" scribblings are preserved, for future researchers to find and document?

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:Death by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Why not... do this interesting thing called VISIT YOUR FAMILY.

      Want to know what your family members are like? Get in a car, plane, boat, whatever and spend the week.

      You don't need yuppy-thoughts on the web to find out what your family is like.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  51. They're all the same. by karmaflux · · Score: 1

    They all have the same features, the same performance, the same plugins cross-ported to all the blog platforms, and shoddy integration of other cgi programs. None of them can quite keep up with things like referrer spam, although B2Evolution gives it a good shot with a central blacklist. I would like to set up a blog for my family which includes at least a decent gateway to something like webcalendar and coppermine or gallery2. The only package that comes close to this is drupal, but that program tends to get lost in masturbatory taxonomy garbage. It also has a big problem with its architecture getting in the way of usable interfaces. If you don't believe me, try setting up the Event module. When will something new come along? I'm not interested in writing one myself; I don't have the time. I just can't understand why I appear to be the only person who wants a consistent interface across the various sections of a website -- without resorting to the "Kubrick" skin, which appears to have been ported to every program on the planet.

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

  52. I like Postnuke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like Postnuke! but I have heard good things about Mambo and Drupal.

    Please do not email me at ftrotter@uversainc.com since I no longer work there... instead try use the contact form on fredtrotter.com

  53. Re:Nobody cares about you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet here you are posting on slashdot...

  54. A great use for RSSOwl by ShatteredDream · · Score: 1

    If you open a blog article in a new window in RSSOwl you can have the RSS feed, the actual article and your blog web app's new entry page open in the same neat little program. I love it, and wish that they'd include real built-in support for Movable Type and Wordpress.

  55. The only one with native video ... by b0r1s · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is vobbo

    Sure, many people don't care about native video, but if you do, check us out.

    --
    Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    1. Re:The only one with native video ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it uses the proprietary Flash video format instead of an open format like QuickTime. Want to use a different codec, like H.264 for example? Tough shit. Can't be done.

      Swing and a miss.

    2. Re:The only one with native video ... by b0r1s · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can upload QuickTime (or WMV, or pure AVI) if you want, and we convert from FLV to other formats as needed (3GP, for example, for sending videos to your cell phone).

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
  56. Text Blogs are so old hat! by kahanamoku · · Score: 1

    Bring on the Podcast Blogs! And their associated Fame!

    --
    ----- Concentrate on promoting more than demoting.
  57. Re:Nobody cares about you by gauauu · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Nobody cares about me? thanks for the ego boost. But I would disagree.

    Right now I live in China. I have some pretty interesting life experiences, compared to my family and friends in the US. They all love to hear from me, but face it, it's hard to keep in good contact with all my friends and family, all the time. That's where a blog comes in. My 15 friends and family members (who DO care about me!) get to read up about my life in China. In an unobtrusive way, on their time and terms.

    I don't plan on getting famous with my blog, I don't plan on changing the world. I just plan on letting people know what's going on with my life. And based on the response I get from people I know, or used to know, it's worthwhile.

    So I'm sorry you don't have any friends or family that care. I do.

  58. It's all over, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    70,000 new blogs a day? The terrorists have already won.

  59. Re:Nobody cares about you by nbert · · Score: 1

    If I walk downtown and there is some "message" on a sidewall I don't really have a chance not to waste at least a glance. But if some boring person has a blog online sharing his/her trivialities of live chances are quite low that I will actually end up there. I don't really see the problem here.

  60. Plain old HTML by JanneM · · Score: 2, Informative

    As far as I know, html/css is the only option if you don't have the ability to install and run anything on the server you have access to. I have a cobbled together perl app that allows me to write posts as text with some minimal markup, and translates it to proper html with links, image scaling and thumbnail creation, rss feed generation and so on, and moves it all up to the server using scp. The only thing I'm missing is the ability to have it indexed by blox indexers, but then, I'm not really writing for a larger audience anyhow so I don't much mind.

    To me this is a good compromise - it's lean, easy to manage if there's a problem, and a static page loads real fast - and I've been surprised that there doesn't seem to exist any "real" tools for managing a static webpage-type blog like this.

    http://lucs.lu.se/people/jan.moren/log/current.htm l

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:Plain old HTML by Space+Cow · · Score: 1

      I think there are many apps that do exactly what you described.

      Here is one I know of:

      http://www.fogcreek.com/CityDesk/index.html/

    2. Re:Plain old HTML by JanneM · · Score: 1

      A CMS is not a blog tool - it's way overkill; not suited at all for what I need. It'd take me more time and effort to learn to use it than it was for me to write the perl program I use. Also, I don't have Windows, so I couldn't use that particular one anyhow.

      I'm quite happy with my script; the lack of something similar was idle musings rather than a plea for help.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  61. Re:Blog? Blech ... Reading--BAD, Writing--BAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, people who lead interesting lives don't read Slashdot threads.

    Nor do they write free software.

    For that matter, people who do anything I don't do must be people who don't lead interesting lives.

    BOO to anyone who's doing something I don't think is worthwhile!
     
    ... Now, back to the adult conversation.
    Like the man said, this thread is for opinions on the software reviewed in the smackdown... NOT for complaining about blogs, or offering tips on other obscure blogging software.

    I use WordPress, or at least I'm in the process of switching to WordPress from Blogger. Blogger was great to get my blog up and running quickly, but its feature set is too limited for serious use. WordPress can do just about anything and is great for programming types who like to fiddle with code as well as write. Guilty as charged. :-)

    I'll be writing an article about the switch soon. Kaz, be sure to tune in!

  62. What about roller? by puppetluva · · Score: 1

    I've had my eye on Roller for a long time (I think it is bundled with mac osx too). Is anyone using this?
    http://www.rollerweblogger.org/

    It took about 5 minutes for me to set up, but I never really got into the blog rythym.

    Do the heavy-duty bloggers out there like it?

    1. Re:What about roller? by gludington · · Score: 1

      I've had my eye on Roller for a long time (I think it is bundled with mac osx too). Is anyone using this? http://www.rollerweblogger.org/
      MacOSX comes with a java-based blogging system, but it is not roller, but blojsom. Blojsom itself was inspired by the perl/CGI blosxom.
    2. Re:What about roller? by jsight · · Score: 1

      It's used by JRoller, the most popular Java Blogging site on the net.

      And I think all of it's users agree that it's not that great. It's one of the weaker Blog products on the market, unfortunately (spoken as user myself). There are some pretty astonishingly bad bugs in it's handling of spam and comment authentication, eg.

  63. WordPress & Gallery 2 Integration = priceless! by scaturan · · Score: 1

    using a plugin called WPG2 written by Ozgreg, I use Gallery 2 exclusively both as a standalone and embedded in WordPress 1.5.x - works great. looking forward to the upcoming WordPress 1.6 souped up with Ajax. =) i strongly believe that these 2 powerful personal publishing platforms will one day become a standard package to be offered competitively by hosting providers. :) Gallery - http://gallery.sf.net/ WordPress - http://wordpress.org/ wpg2 plugin - http://wpg2.ozgreg.com/forums/

  64. The best of the best by SamLJones · · Score: 1

    I've got to put in a word for the best of blogs. BloopDiary is small, but it is by far the best-coded, best-designed webdiary site I've seen (beats the pants off Xanga or LiveJournal). Unfortunately, as it's run by about 3 people, logistics puts an 8000-user cap on it.

  65. I still think "blog" is a dumb name by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Awhile ago I posted my opinion that "(we)blog" is a really dumb term; originating in a needlessly confusing coinage and so vague as to be essentially meaning-free at this point. (Apologies to Jorn Barger, but that's how I feel.) Back when the infamous JonKatz posted his grand weblog article on Slashdot, a large minority of the commenters apparently had similar feelings. When I expressed the sentiment on Slashdot earlier this year, I got flamed (though again a significant minority agreed that it's potentially confusing and frankly just sounds dumb). What a difference six years makes, eh?

    At this point I'm hoping blogs will do what portals did (you all remember portal mania, right? No?) -- become so blatantly overused and silly to the point of self-parody that they just dry up and blow away. What used to be "portals" continue to exist; they are known by the more pedestrian but more meaningful name "websites". Here's hoping all these "blogs" will become "journals" and "news" again.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
    1. Re:I still think "blog" is a dumb name by siliconjunkie · · Score: 1

      On a semi-related note, the article you mention included a post from Jason Kottke.

    2. Re:I still think "blog" is a dumb name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree with you more. When I first heard the term, I thought "weblog" meant the log activity on a web server, and I still prefer that definition. "blog" or "weblog" are both incredibly stupid names. With the name aside, I am still unable to grasp why "bogs" are supposedly so popular. There is nothing new/different about them from the days of geocities/tripod/angelfire. A blog is a new way to market personal homepages, that's all it is. People back in the day were using "personal homepage" sites to post pictures of their dog/family/etc, but you had to know HTML.. nowadays, you don't even need to use HTML. Lastly, I really wish there was an option in google/search engines so you could REMOVE blogs from being searched. I get so pissed off when I do a search and get some asshole's blogs in the top results. They are so (obviously) opinionated and of no help whatsoever. I don't care what some random joe has to say about things...

  66. Poor comparsion... by kosmosik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Meaning - WTF? This is /. - I need to review blog comparsion for grannies/teens whatever? I review lots of publishing software (and not - not just PHP based, free-as-in-beer stuff). There ale lots of valuable positions - but I mean the comparsion. It is flawed - it just compares ease of use and nice interface, blogging is not about that. Blogging is complicated. I mean I would like to see comparsion of heavy CMS systems that *also* do versioning, publication of *any* file type (photos, flash, movies and shit like that), decent folksonomy, dozens of plugins, easy API etc.

    This would be blogging soft for me. But this comparsion is retarded (in my geek head of course). I like power/flexibility/functionality - whatever I do - be it blogging via SSH and VIM, be it PERL or better Python - but let it be flexible and powerful. Not fuckin' retarded.

    Stupid comparsion IMHO.

  67. There's much better comparisons out there... by daVinci1980 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I used the comparison over at asymptotic.net when looking for the blog software for my site. It compares pretty much everything under the sun, in a neat, well defined table with an excellent legend.

    I think the breakdown there is a lot better than the one listed in the article. YMMV.

    --
    I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
    1. Re:There's much better comparisons out there... by RosenSama · · Score: 1
      This comparison is about 18 months old.
      This indicates the current version number of the software in production as of June 13, 2004.
  68. Re:Nobody cares about you by JanneM · · Score: 1

    What little spat Felisha is having at school with her boyfriend and her ex boyfriend and her ex boyfriend'ss new girlfriend or her suicidal poetry and half-assed slutty pics posted to try and garner attention to her blog are not interesting and not worthy of being put on the internet.

    I'd say it's all plenty interesting to Felisha's boyfriend, her ex, their common friends and acquintances. And their writings are interesting - even absorbing - to Felisha in turn.

    Turn it around: most stuff out on the net is not interesting for more than a small group of people. Your "person with some notariety in their chosen medical profession" is utter snoozorama for the vast majority out there, and is thus no more (and no mess) worthy of being available on the net than Felisha's anxieties.

    It's out there for those who want to read it. And if you don't want to (which most people do not) then don't.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  69. stunningly content free by sdedeo · · Score: 1

    A stunningly content-free article, with a word to ad ratio that rivals Vogue.

    --
    Protect your liberties. Donate to the ACLU
  70. Write your own :) by finkployd · · Score: 1

    I wrote my own (in c no less, no cgic even, not recommended for anyone not doing it purely for fun).

    It features database independence (through an abstraction layer), it is designed to let the webserver do the authenticatication rather than handling it internally (because I use kerberos and sometimes cosign or shibboleth), and it is completely theme-able (all html and css is read in via templates, kinda like slashcode but less ugly :P

    It also features robust group based authorization controls for all functions, that combined with the "authentication system agnostic" design is something I have never found elsewhere (and thus why I felt the need to write my own)

    I will someday release the source, once I get around to cleaning it up and making it presentable.

    My weblog
    My Department's weblog (same software)

    Finkployd

  71. Moveable Type by jelevy01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use moveable type at my http://www.quarterlifeliving.com/ blog... I tried WordPress (cause its free) and didn't meet my needs at all. It was way to simple. What I love about movabletype are the plugins, using the BigApi (or something like that, can't remember now) which allows you to modify almost ever UI component. I then using Ajaxify http://www.sixapart.com/pronet/plugins/plugin/ajax ify.html to get a AJAX wysiwyg editoring.. Tons of plug-ins come out all the time.. I love it.. Check out all the plug-ins here http://www.sixapart.com/pronet/plugins/all.html

  72. How many real blogs per day? by SteveX · · Score: 1

    I've seen that 70,000 new blogs per day figure, but you really need a filter on top of that to determine the real number of new blogs. Is blogging a phenomenon that millions of users are getting into? Or does it just look that way from the states?

    I wrote and ran some software for a while that tracked blog posts by fetching data from ping.blo.gs and analyzing it looking for trends. The biggest trend I found was that most of the pings were spam.

    Spam accounted for ~70% of the posts that came through. You can see it on http://www.weblogs.com/. There are probably (by now) millions of blogs on the major blogging services that exist solely as vehicles for spam. It sucks. A fraction of the data that I got was actually real blog posts written by real humans, and only a small fraction of that was useful content.

    All that said, I run WordPress and I like it. :)

    1. Re:How many real blogs per day? by scaturan · · Score: 1

      yep, not to mention, splogs. lots of newly created "instant account activation" services out there are bombarded daily with splogs.

  73. Re:Nobody cares about you by Ithika · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Blogs don't have to be publicly viewable. I'm sure many people write completely private entries. If you wander round LiveJournal an awful lot of people post to a select group of friends, ie their blogs are "by invitation only".

    You have to go to the effort of loading up a blog in order to reading - hardly comparable to spraying stuff on a wall.

    Being a celebrity is hardly a reason to have an interesting blog; being able to write is. The successful blogs belong to people who are interesting writers. Whether they write about their experiences in computer security, the London Ambulance Service or evolutionary biology, it always comes down to content. It takes a lot of skill to write about nothing and make it interesting, so why are you complaining that 14-year-olds don't write interesting blogs? They're probably sub-literate to start with!

    Complaining that anything is bad when all you've seen are the very worst examples is misguided and childish. Or flamebait.

  74. How many die? by BigZaphod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many blogs die each day? I'm guessing the number is also quite large...

  75. Several by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    There are several software packages that make the avg blog worth reading. WindowsXp, [your favorite flavor of] Linux, Unix

    The key ingredient is the delete key.

    If more bloggers learned how to use it, I think the readabilty of blogs would, on average, go up.

    As a side note, the keyboard shortcut Ctrl-W works in both FireFox and IE6. This may also benefit your average blog experience.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  76. web logs.... article worthless. by mrsbrisby · · Score: 1

    The article fails to address the most important issue of any piece of blogging software:

    does it save any time

    It seems to talk about all the problems you'll have (spam, configuration, administration, etc), and I appreciate that they skim the fact that having a managed blog means you don't have to deal with this shit.

    does it save any time

    Much blog software is yet another PHP application complete with image posts, modules and forums, and every bell and whistle, and that is just fine except normal people can't or don't want to use that. They want to be able to publish their thoughts and/or knowledge and not have it take a lot of their time to do so.

    Many roll-your-own bloggers I know of spend a great deal of time with link and content spam, adjusting links, dealing with stupid textarea or HTMLArea junk, and heaven forbid they actually post any content.

    does it save any time

    If not, then I'm sticking to blogging with vi.

  77. Friction good? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    I think the current state that blogs (and public wikis as well) are (massively generalizing) pretty much useless shows that sometimes friction is useful.

    For a long time people bitched about the publishing companies, saying that they squashed creativity by focussing too much on monetary concerns. Desktop publishing made some things easier, now very easy to make your own zine and publish. But though the friction of self-publishing was radically reduced, it was still too high for most people. Desktop publishing software was expensive, you still had to have paper and pay for it, and need a place and manner of distribution.

    Blogs (and wikis) made publishing nearly frictionless. go to some shared blogger site, carve out your space, use some subset of HTML, and you're someplace where everyone in the world can see you. With wikis, you have the wonder of a truly democratic world, where everyone's opinion is just as valid as anyone else's.

    Seems to me now, the friction is somewhat valuable. We have a lot of crap out there. Having publishers need to guess salability of books meant a lot of crap never saw the light of day. The majority of people out there either just can't write or have nothing worth reading. You may not have liked all the publisher's choices but a lot of junk got filtered (as was good things that didn't meet their message of course).

    It's interesting that a couple of the features they mentioned were spam plug-ins, and one had a feature that posts required a confirmation, both adding friction to the community aspect of the software. Even Wikipedia is looking to add some friction, to make it a little harder to post - coincidentally someone showed me a fight over Rachael Ray's Wikipedia entry this morning, adding sexual statements about her. They could use some friction.

    Not saying that we need to go back to the old way. But in the Utopian days of the web, everyone was saying how we'd forever remove all friction and the world would be better for it. Now we see that friction is sometimes useful. It hasn't eliminated the large corporations, just shuffled some around, making new ones. Google understood that in the new frictionless world, people would need new guideposts, making google the new creator of friction (hard for people to trip on your website if its not in first 20 or so google hits). they're all billionaires for it.

  78. Rolled my own by scooterphish · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When all the 'big boys' blog scripts either had too much fluff or not enough features, I took it upon myself to write my own, learning more in-depth PHP and mysql in the process.
    My blogging tool doesn't have features that I'll never use (no plugins or cruft taking up server space) and I don't have to wait for developers to create something that I want in a blogging tool (if I want it, I'll add it..even if it means learning something new).

  79. drupal and monetizing by opencity · · Score: 1

    I sorted out putting Adsense on an older version of Drupal for a friends friends news analysis site. A good CMS and the latest version supports adsense easily.

    In TFA, however, I didn't notice any mention of adsense or other - read: Amazon - monetizing methods. (read quick, however, so apologies if that's FUD)

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  80. I get paid to do this stuff, recently. by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ever since a year ago, when I was laid off, I've been contracting for companies who need CMS software. I've tried a LOT of them at this point.

    Agitar Software uses Movable Type to power their site. It's a corporate site, not really a blog. I added a boatload of PHP statements to the MT templates, so that it would provide i18n (the pages get generated with PHP code in them, then they become dynamic PHP files on the server). Unfortunately, we don't do much with the i18n yet. No matter what you pick, it's in English. But we've got a translation firm on the hook, so that will change. I also work on Developer Testing, which is far, far more bloggy (also uses MT).

    Mill Valley Film Festival uses Drupal. It isn't really bloggy, but on the backend, that's how it works. There are a few "blogs" available (such as "Film Listings"), and the staff add in entries. I also have just started a very basic drupal blog for my daughter's class.

    I have a boatload of other blog-like sites I maintain (mostly using Mambo & Joomla), and I've even open-sourced some software to turn phpBB into a blogging system.

    So, with some credentials out of the way, here's my impressions.

    First, Movable Type is archaic, even with the new 3.2 update. It's great for old-school Web publishing, where the main players know a few HTML tags and dynamic publishing isn't terribly urgent. Yes, MT can do dynamic publishing, but there are other systems that do that waaaaayyy better. So its strength is more along the lines of "update & release, update & release."

    It has hard-coded fields, but you can muck around with them (moreso in 3.2). We use those fields for features that don't really tie into the fields anymore. For example, when a user wants to control the URL of an entry, he/she fills out our keywords field. It's just how the solutions have evolved.

    I think MT is weakest at looping through entries. The entire scoping system is arbitrary. Some plugins sometimes return global loops, other times narrowly-scoped loops, which can be really not-fun to learn about. Overall, Movable Type seems to me to be a workhorse, reliable, but old and no longer well-devised.

    Drupal is very frustrating. The template system is rigid. The PHPTemplate plugin helps. I used it exclusively on mvff.com. But it still requires a huge investment into figuring out how it works. In some cases, I ended up posting support questions and then later answering them myself on drupal.org -- partly because the forums are quiet, and partly because I was pushing the system waaaayy more than the bulk of users do. But what's surprising is that I wasn't doing much. You can see that from mvff.com -- it's just a film Web site. It's not highly sophisticated. If you're going to be building a typical site and the system requires so much tweaking that you become a bleeding-edge pioneer for it, that's a bit much. Drupal is too technical for the average blogger.

    What Drupal does well is the plugin system. A default install of Drupal comes with a boatload of plugins. Want forums? Just click a button. Want blogs? Click a button. Want an image gallery? Click a button. For example, with the school blog that I built using Drupal, I went with almost all of the defaults, and it was a lot easier to setup. It took maybe 3 hours from start to finish. It also looks really plain and doesn't do much, however. And I'm still having trouble getting the TinyMCE HTML GUI to work properly on that system. I don't know why yet.

    Joomla seems to be the best of both worlds -- a fair balance of tradeoffs on the technical side, but also a backend control pa

    1. Re:I get paid to do this stuff, recently. by rmm4pi8 · · Score: 1

      Interesting comments. I recently converted the six separate Wordpress installs on my site into one Drupal codebase, and the only major problems were with importing posts, which I suppose is difficult anytime you're not doing something obvious like MT->WP or suchlike (and perhaps even then). After taking the time to figure out (definitely its own vocabulary-world) how Drupal works, I started using it for my paid projects and found it extremely flexible.

      I encountered the same basic problem you did with sections, and just decided to use multiple 'sites' with shared tables as my fix. Oh, and I agree with you 100% about the Drupal forums.

      I don't really know anything about Mambo/Joomla. I see that it has the kind of "sections" support that you (and I) were looking for from Drupal...but does it have anything as flexible as the taxonomy and flexinode modules? And most importantly for my uses, does it have anything with the power of organic groups? I didn't really find a lot of features information on the Joomla website, and no indication of anything like that in the demo, but presumably it doesn't have all the modules/plugins loaded. Also, why the name change/fork? That's not really explained either.

      If you ever want to pick a brain on Drupal stuff with better response times than the forums, feel free to email me (I don't have time to cruise the forums).

      --
      U.S. War Crimes blog. Email for free Mandriva support.
  81. Shameless plug by laffer1 · · Score: 1

    Ok since everyone else is pushing their favorite blog software, I'll push mine. http://www.justjournal.com/

    Its an open source java based blog software. I've been working on it for about 3 years on and off in my spare time. The code is not so good, but it works. I just released a windows client that will be GPL'd and the java code is BSD Licensed. The project is also on source forge.

    I wrote this because livejournal was very slow at the time it was started. I got sick of waiting for LJ servers and I did't feel like paying.

    My current setup is mysql 5 + tomcat 5.5 + apache 2 + freebsd.

  82. Scoop! by Soong · · Score: 1

    I have to plug Scoop as a pain-in-the-ass powerful chunk of mod_perl that I've set up a few times. It apparently is capable of scaling up pretty well, handling the million+ hit days of dailykos.com

    --
    Start Running Better Polls
  83. Photo blogs... by g0at · · Score: 1

    As a bit of an aside here, I'm developing my own photo blog system (see current version in action). Another poster mentions some benefits to rolling your own app, so I thought I would chime in here.

    This started as a way to cater to my own needs and desires in a photo management-and-display system. Currently I am my only user, but if anyone else is interested in this effort (either from a development or "i wanna use it too!" standpoint), by all means please get in touch.

    -b

  84. Anyone know a patent attorney by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    I have a good idea for a mobile device to keep a good blog. It incorporates a few key technologies together for something that is very awesome. I have no idea how to patent something though.

  85. Write your own! by clockwise_music · · Score: 1

    Bah. Real programmers write their own. That's what's running on my site (don't give me any slashdot crap about ASP, it's crap but it works). Only took a few hours but it's configurable to the EXTREME!

    1. Re:Write your own! by wpiman · · Score: 1

      Real men don't use automated bloggers and edit their pages with vi.

  86. Not sure why you'd want that by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Sure, many people don't care about native video, but if you do, check us out.

    A blog full of videos like this? Count me out.

    On the other hand it is more interesting than 99% of any other video blog I've ever seen.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not sure why you'd want that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Videos like this?

      I don't know about you, but if my wife's family could use computers, we'd record pictures of our kids like that, and I think that would be a GREAT use of technology.

  87. I don't get it, where's the violence? by initialE · · Score: 1

    So we were smacking bloggers down? Hello?

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  88. Always the same problem. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    Blog software always has the same problem.

    No hierarchical display of replies. Nothing makes me puke than being lured to a blog, only to find out it works with crappy BBCODE in it's default puky blue-green colour scheme, and who is full of stupid out-of-context comments and/or reduntant quotations.

    Slashcode has hierarchical display of replies, yes, but is unfortunately written in PERL.

  89. The Cramp's take on the Blog by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Sung to the tune of "Surfin' Bird" by The Cramps.

    "well everybody's agog, about the blog! blog blog blog, the blog is the fog! blog blog blog, the blog is the fog! well everybody's agog, about the blog! blog blog blog, the blog is the fog! everybody's agog, about the blog! blog blog blog, the blog is the fog! everybody's agog, about the blog! blog blog blog, the blog is the fog! don't you know about the blog ? well everybody's agog, about the blog! blog blog blog, the blog is the fog! blog blog blog, the blog is the fog! yeah! well everybody's agog, about the blog!"

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  90. Blosxom and Pico, baby! by simetra · · Score: 1

    Call me old fasioned... Blosxom works pretty well for me... here's a link: http://www.raelity.org/apps/blosxom/

    It's php based. Sure, it's a bit old-fasioned and isn't all webby-schmebby, but who cares. I SSH to my server and add entries as I see fit. Yes, there are probably easier, better, more fun and geekerific ways to do it, but that's how I do it.

    Also, I started doing what kids today call blogging back in 1994... periodic diary-type entries on my webpage. Looking back, maybe I should've kept copies of it all, but that would've been a pain in the ass without something like Blosxom, which keeps things in tidy little directories. Oh well.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Blosxom and Pico, baby! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Here's a better link to the actual project, not Rael's personal blog: Bloxsom

      And, last time I checked, Bloxsom was written in Perl, not PHP, although there is a PHP implementation (IIRC).

      One nice feature of Bloxsom is that it doesn't use a database back end. It uses the directory structure, and blog entries are merely text files placed in the appropriate directory (or folder, if you're using the Mac paradigm). The top line of the text file is the headline, all that follows is the entry.

      Another nice thing about bloxsom is that while a base installation is very simple and barebones, it has a plug-in architecture, making it very customizable and extensible.

      All in all, bloxsom is great for someone like me with just a little technical proficiency. I've set it up several times and played with it, but I never kept up with updating. I just don't have a need to share my every thought and experience with the world and I'm lazy.

      However, I'm setting something up for a company with which I'm associated, and I'm considering using it for their News section. We might be setting up an OS X server, so we might even use blojsom, the Java port of bloxsom.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  91. Oh come now! by emagery · · Score: 1

    I suppose it is nice to have software to do this stuff for ya... it's like bb forums or some such likeness. But as I have done, so shall I say: Write your OWN software! Write it in modperl! Or php... or flash (though here you'd still want a php/perl handler to submit your vars)! You can do it!

  92. Nucleus by Fantasy+Football · · Score: 0

    I use Nucleus for my blog - have yet to find a negative for it.

  93. Re:cmsmatrix.org is where you can check them all o by johnkoer · · Score: 1

    Wow! That is a great site.

    I already made my choice based on the hardware and software that I had available and I went with Serendipity. It works well for me and it is very easy to use and administer. I did have some trouble with their HTML Nuggets (Custom HTML inside their sections) not displaying the Google search window properly, but I was able to modify some HTML to get around it.

    For a simple blog, it works great.

  94. How do you know? by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    Actually, the statement was quite clear that the relationship existed "Because it's free". Whether the "free" meant price or some set of freedoms, it's not true. The statement applied to more than just WordPress even though it was in a section of an article concerning WordPress.

    But it will be entertaining to watch you prove that absolutely nobody will take money providing any degree of support for WordPress. I expect it will take you some time to exhaustively detail this, so might I suggest starting with the commercial service providers pointed to on WordPress' website just because they seem to be obvious choices for someone looking to pay someone for WordPress service.

    It seems like there's a big world of consultants out there and I don't know them all. I'm guessing that there are more than just me who continue to do paid support for a variety of GPL-covered programs.

    1. Re:How do you know? by Arandir · · Score: 1

      But it will be entertaining to watch you prove that absolutely nobody will take money providing any degree of support for WordPress.

      I have no intention of doing that, because it's completely and utterly irrelevant. The original argument was that it didn't have support. That's still true despite any longwinded sermons by Richard Stallman you manage to dig up.

      That page you linked to doesn't have paid support, it only has hosting services. You're playing games with semantics. While they "support" WordPress in the sense that they let you run it on their servers, there's no evidence that they will help you install it, help you configure it, or fix it if it breaks.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    2. Re:How do you know? by Lijemo · · Score: 1

      You're playing games with semantics.

      Words have meaning. That meaning matters to communication. Thus "semantics" have some relevance to any converstaion.

      The statement"There is no paid support available for WordPress": I'm too lazy to investigate this, so I will take you at your word and assume that this statement is absolutely true.

      The statement "There is no paid support avialable for WordPress because it's free:" This statement is pattently false, even if the other is presumed to be ture. There are, demonstrably, services and consultants that offer paid support for "free" software in both senses of the word "free". So claiming that it's "free" status is the reason why there is no paid support is perposterous.

      If that's playing games with semantics, then so is any spoken or written form of language where words have meaning and logic is followed.

  95. LJ blocks client-side scripting by PerlPunk · · Score: 1

    I once evaluated LJ, among TypePad and WordPress, and I decided that LJ was not what my group was looking for because it blocks client-side scripting. We needed client-side scripting.

  96. go Drupal by rmm4pi8 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was looking for something similar, and I think in the end you're going to end up with either Mambo or Drupal. Mambo has friendlier forums and seems easier to get going, but Drupal is better architected for growth--both of features and of userbase. Both are actively developed. If you have questions about Drupal before you start out or need help installing it, feel free to drop me an email.

    Drupal does everything you want out of the box, except in order to get different style-sheets for each blog you'd have to upload the stylesheet yourself and set it as usable--but that's perhaps desirable as a security feature anyway, otherwise your users could be writing their own javascript without oversight.

    Hope that helps, and good luck to you no matter what you choose.

    --
    U.S. War Crimes blog. Email for free Mandriva support.
  97. This article is a load of crap. by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 1

    He goes through all three, calls them blogs.

    Walks his way through the smackdown, rates each one and basically says WordpPress wins on points.
    For some reason he decides to mention "MultiUser" is somehow important when if you're talking about running an individual Blog, Multiuser wasn't what you wanted in the first place.

    Whatever. His personal recommendation is with "TextPattern" and he says he likes it because he really just wants it to publish content. In the words of TextPattern's Author:

    "A free, flexible, elegant, easy-to-use content management system for all kinds of websites, even weblogs."

    Sounds to me like the intent here for TextPattern is a CMS not a Blog, so given that -- was this an article about Blog software? Or an article about his new favorite CMS? My favorite CMS is Expressionengine by PMachine.org, but I'm not going to write an article about Blog software to get folks to pay attention to me so I can make a point about something else I really wanted to talk about.

    --
    "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
  98. Pivot by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    seeing as my blog is done with it :) Its from our friends in the netherlands. Main page is here

    1. Re:Pivot by VDM · · Score: 1

      I too support Pivot. Nice, no underlying database.

  99. Re:Slashcode? Yes? SlashGISRS.org? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *goes to http://www.slashcode.com/sites.pl*

    Wow! That's a _LOT_ of sites running slashcode!

  100. "podcast" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, that's all I have to say here.

    podcast.

    I mean, doesn't that make the word "blog" seem so much better?

  101. Use Serendipity by Pop69 · · Score: 1

    Works great and supports Postgreqsl if you're of the frame of mind that MySQL have signed up with the devil.

    Get the software at

    http://www.s9y.org/

    And see an example at

    http://www.benarty.co.uk/blog/

  102. Agreed by samael · · Score: 1

    I want to write about stuff and keep in touch with a few friends. The last thing I want to do is worry about hosting things, upgrading software and dealing with it all going wrong. I chose Livejournal because (a) it's got an RSS reader built in, so I can read what my friends are up to in one place and (b)I don't have to worry about the technical side of things any more than I want to.

  103. Anyone using Serendipity? by Proto23 · · Score: 1

    I am using http://www.s9y.org/ at my Positive News blog at http://www.tiouw.com/serendipity/ (in Dutch so you probably cant read it). And I like it a lot. I thought it was more famous though. So anyone else using this?

  104. and of those 30 only 1 ever gets updated by fantomas · · Score: 1

    yup and of the 30 of a 100 of 70,000 only one gets updated more than 3 times. Seriously, do people really believe that at some point in the near future everybody on the planet will be keeping an online diary (and maintaining it)? Soon microsoft will package some sort of blog tool with new OS's and the blog-fanatics will go crazy proclaiming a million new blogs a day. I predict it will flatten at at somewhere near the number of people who keep a paper diary. What percentage of the global population is that?

  105. Joomla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried a few different packages, but found that full content management software provided the best alternative for http://www.surviveoutsourcing.com/

  106. Emacs anyone...? by StarBar · · Score: 1

    Whats wrong with HTML editing in Emacs?? Who cares about databases and serverside scripts and such when reading about the blisters you have under your feet anyway, or whatever. Write something interesting and not spend time on howtodoit! It would be like polishing your car put don't afford to fill it with fuel.

  107. B2Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it interesting that the article selects WordPress for review but laments its inability to do multiple blogs. On the other hand, another popular derivative b2evolution does do multiple blogs and is very similar to WordPress. It was one of the applications that the Linux.Plupii virus targets, but there was a patch available two months before the virus was found.

  108. Surfin' Bird by The Trashmen by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Sung to the tune of "Surfin' Bird" by The Cramps ... "well everybody's agog, about the blog! blog blog blog, the blog is the fog", etc.

    Nice parody, made me chuckle.

    The Cramps are a great band, likewise The Ramones -- however, Surfin' Bird was written by The Trashmen --

    Link

    Link

    Link

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Surfin' Bird by The Trashmen by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you got me on that one. Oops.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  109. Could not get to that site by sczimme · · Score: 1


    I used the comparison over at asymptotic.net

    I tried to visit that site: I got closer and closer but never actually got there. Oh, well.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  110. Best part? Two are open source by CodeShark · · Score: 1
    As is Slashcode, Postnuke, Xaraya, and a number of other projects.

    Which means that a good developer can "stand on the shoulder of giants" so to say and raise the standard on one or more simply by contributing to the community. By which I mean that I am in the process of delivering a semi-customized content management system for a small non-profit that I donate programming time to, and at present, the MySQL schema (database definition for the non-technical reader) that I am writing has drawn "coding wisdom" from approximately ten different open-source CMS or BLOG projects. This doesn't begin to count the exponential increase in my own library of coding skills based on looking at how others have implemented similar functionality and then picking and choosing the best techniques to follow.

    But the bottom line about open source is that even if I write every line of code myself, when the time comes to release* my stuff back to the community, and then perhaps someone else will "stand on my shoulders" to make whatever I do even better.

    (BTW time to release = when I have time to bulletproof and secure the codebase better than I have done so far in terms of the most recent types of attacks and spam abusers).

    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
  111. Re:Nobody cares about you by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

    So why did you post this here? You're not famous, so who cares what you think?

    Honestly, if it's bad that some people think their posts are interesting, it's far worse when people like you think your posts are interesting, and better than everyone else's, whose posts you think should be banned.

    Should this apply to other things too? Should email and chat rooms be censored if they don't get your seal of approval?

  112. For Web 2.0 buzzword compliance by JemalCole · · Score: 1

    I recommend Typo to people willing to get their hands dirty. It's built on Ruby on Rails, uses AJAX, and all the other Web 2.0 goodness could want (tagging is in the works, feeds for everything, yellow fade, blue gradients).

  113. Blosxom Family? by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
    Pity the article didn't mention any members of the blosxom family. This family is distinguished by using the filesystem as its article store, rather than an SQL database; also it's known for the extensive use of plugins to provide features like comments, SQL databases, calendars and so forth.

    I started using blosxom for Octopodial Chrome several years ago and have been very happy with it. Besides the original perl blosxom, there's PyBlosxom (a port to Python) and my own pre-alpha Lisp Blosxom. This last is a port to Common Lisp; it doesn't work yet, but someday I hope that it'll be pretty nice.

  114. Re:iBlog: What about Community Server???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why didn't the author talk about Community Server? CS is my favorite blogging software, and it's very easy to setup.

  115. Do it the fun away by matt+me · · Score: 1

    My one gripe with blogs is how identical they all are, despite differences in software. Everyone' s doing the same thing. Sure they may be themed differently, but they are all the same. In less than half a second after you take the link, you *know* that site's a blog. You know *exactly* what to expect. What's to make it stand out? You need to be unique. Sure they may "theme" them differently, but they all fit the same box. And however magic the software may be, you're just another blogger.

    Write your own software. On my site I had a blog, a wiki, some photo galleries, a few games and other bits of interactive content. Sure, it was a bit hackish, but it was unique. It was true to me. People enjoyed it as much as I enjoyed coding it. They were such impressed. New features would be celebrated. You won't get hacked. You won't get spammed. Both problems with Wordpress and Kwiki. Kwiki especially, and Wordpress were both much slower, bloated (despite any try at modularity), and an absolute mission to theme - i spent oh so long trying to get them to match the existing design of my site. Wordpress - wordpress wanted to infringe on me with its static pages and modules, rather than let itself be part of my site.

    You don't need all those features to have fun. The worst thing is having to a make a user, a password, fill in all your details, confirm your address and login just to comment on a blog. If I can't post pseudo-anonymously, I don't on blogs. They don't care for my opinion. I was spammed on both Kwiki and Wordpress. My softwares been fine. The wiki code was ridiculously simple. Just a few lines. But it worked such a treat.

  116. Re:cmsmatrix.org is where you can check them all o by justMichael · · Score: 1

    OpenSourceCMS is a good resource as well. With lots of demos to try out.

  117. Re:iBlog: What about Community Server???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Community Server rocks! Probably the most powerful blogging platform out there right now for blog communities. I use it on my personal site too and it works great.

  118. For Web 2.0 buzzword compliance by JemalCole · · Score: 1

    I recommend Typo to people willing to get their hands dirty. It's built on Ruby on Rails, uses AJAX, and all the other Web 2.0 goodness could want (tagging is in the works, feeds for everything, yellow fade, blue gradients).

  119. a new blog indexer service is needed... by GodLived · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the early days of the WWW, when thousands of web pages were being created per day. Nowadays, it's blogs. How about we follow the pattern and make a new blogger indexer service... "Bloogle," anyone?

  120. An incomplete comparison by g8oz · · Score: 1

    A better comparison was at
    www.asymptomatic.net/blogbreakdown.htm

    Unfortunately the site is down, but you can check the Google cache still

    http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:Du2NeIh3jzkJ:w ww.asymptomatic.net/blogbreakdown.htm+blog+compari son&hl=en

    The blog breakdown in this article is pretty lame compared to this one, which covers

    b2Evolution,bBlog, BLOG:CMS, Blojsom, Blosxom, Expression Engine,MovableType, Nucleus, Pivot, pMachine Pro, Serendipity, SPIP, .Text, TextPattern, and WordPress.

    One thing to remember is that Drupal, Mambo, ezPublish etc are CMS packages not really blog software.

  121. Hah! by sbma44 · · Score: 1
    Wordpress 1.5 already uses the nofollow tag, so you don't have to worry about comments spam.

    Excuse me, but: bwahahahahahahaahaaaaa! Do you run a blog at all? All of the major platforms have support nofollow since it was announced, but it does NOT stop spammers. Most of them are just running spambots to place the links. They don't even bother to check for the presence of nofollow.

    I've been running Movable Type for several years. I installed the NoFollow plugin when it was released, but noticed no difference. MT-Blacklist was helpful, but after upgrading from 2.661 to 3.2 last weekend (which makes MT-Blacklist irrelevant), the difference is amazing. The newer releases are much better at weeding out spam than the old, but nofollow has little to do with it.

  122. the ONLY one? by sbma44 · · Score: 1

    What about Drupal? Or Scoop? Seems to me that plenty of sites have had a lot of success using those packages.

  123. Re:WordPress & Gallery 2 Integration = pricele by Puramoca · · Score: 1

    My humble self found that Gallery is kind of slow when invoked though WPG2 plugin, so I went hard way - adjusted theme of my blog to match my Gallery2. Now they look (almost) the same. It was fun adjusting G2 this way, anyway. :-)

  124. Do the math by nicomp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "With published numbers saying there are approximately 70,000 new blogs being created each day, and the total number of blogs doubling every 5 months" The math desn't work.

  125. The Trashmen: Minneapolis Band by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    The Trashmen have a reverse-deja-vu effect for me, a slippery jog down memory lanes I've never travelled ... they were a Minneapolis band, I was born in Minneapolis and have lived here my entire life ... granted, I was two years old when The Trashmen did their thing -- I was never plugged into any kind of Trashmen scene, not even a post-Trashmen nostalgia scene -- but I feel like, hell, Minneapolis band, how many Minneapolis bands make their mark? Might as well cheer for the home team.

    --
    -kgj