Slashdot Mirror


New Worm Chats with Users on AIM

goldseries writes "CNet is reporting that a new IM worm chats with users to get them to down load a file containing a virus. The virus replicates its self and sends its self out to user's buddy lists. The virus will reply 'lol no this is not a virus.' The virus hides users from seeing the messages sent out to members of their buddy list. Viruses are evolving; now they will even talk to you."

121 of 577 comments (clear)

  1. lol no this is not a virus by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 5, Funny

    my God, this one will be unstoppable.

    1. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 4, Funny

      *correction*

      Windows needs to be fixed so that executables renamed as PIF are NOT executed. God that's stupid.

    2. Re:lol no this is not a virus by prionic6 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This will come in to you from another AIM-user you KNOW and who is infected. Not some stranger.

    3. Re:lol no this is not a virus by b4k3d+b34nz · · Score: 4, Funny

      FTA: "A new worm that targets users of America Online's AOL Instant Messenger..."

      What did anyone expect?

      --
      Grammar Lesson: you're is a contraction of "you are"; your means you possess something; yore means days gone by.
    4. Re:lol no this is not a virus by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Interesting
      my God, this one will be unstoppable.

      Don't you just hate it when Insightful gets modded Funny?

      I can picture it now. All these lusers whining about their toasted computers... 'But my buddy sent it to me! No, I know about viruses, so I asked if it was for real, and he said it wasn't a virus! It sounded just like him!'

      How the hell is this going to be stopped? It's easy to beat the AOL Turing test, because these people use such a warped and simplified form of English that leaves out most of the quirks that give away the lack of any intelligence behind the text. Either we educate AOLusers - in English rather than in computer science - so that they use more complex language that machines can't readily mimic, or we shut down file transfers over IM.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:lol no this is not a virus by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny
      My favorite book title is "AOL for Dummies".

      Well ya. What's your point?

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    6. Re:lol no this is not a virus by tpgp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Windows needs to be fixed so that executables renamed as PIF are NOT executed. God that's stupid.

      How about fixing windows so that it uses execute bit in the filesystem, rather then the extension of the file to decide whether to execute something or not?

      --
      My pics.
    7. Re:lol no this is not a virus by tehshen · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot to include "lol this is not flamebait" in your post.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    8. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Lindril · · Score: 4, Funny
      How the hell is this going to be stopped?

      It's been suggested many times, but it may now be required... euthanizing AOL users.

    9. Re:lol no this is not a virus by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also: if we used proper grammar and spelling, I think it would be easier to filter spam. I'm not involved with the spam problem so much, but it seems to me "words" like v14gr4 would cause problems. Meanwhile if we could detect "v14gr4" isn't a word in our dictionary, we might be able to flag the email as potential spam. Then if you were working on something where the project's code name was "v14gr4" or something, the word would appear underlined, you would click it and click "Add word to dictionary." I don't know if that's even the best way, but I think if everyone used proper spelling and grammer, computer comprehension (and filtering) would be able to improve. I might be wrong.

    10. Re:lol no this is not a virus by tpgp · · Score: 4, Informative

      So people can send out executable jpegs? No thanks.

      I said execute bit in the filesystem.

      So - the virus would come in from the mail system with the execute bit set to 0, the user would have to download the file, get its properties, and tick the "execute" checkbox.

      --
      My pics.
    11. Re:lol no this is not a virus by intangible · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about, and here's a tough one: Microsoft unhide the @%$@#$%@ file extensions on everything by default. WTF is up with hiding them?

      How many trojans are named "something.jpg.exe" or just have a picture icon, or html icon when it's truly an exe? What motard at MS thought hiding "the oh so complex" file extension was a good thing?

      Seriously, this one has bugged me for years. Dumbing down computer interfaces beyond a certain point is just asking for trouble.

    12. Re:lol no this is not a virus by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      euthanizing AOL users

      No. just deny them use of computers until after rehabilitation. Now those who get broadband access AND STILL BUY AOL because it's the Internet, those are the ones to use your tactics on.

    13. Re:lol no this is not a virus by PhoenixPath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or just end up being a fully functionaly Zombie.

      And that's all we need. Another 144 Million Zombie Bot-net.

      Yeah, it'll sort itself out...when we get our "Interneational Reformat, FDISK-MBR, and Re-Install Day"

    14. Re:lol no this is not a virus by tsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple also hide file extensions by default. It's amazingly annoying, but I never here anyone complain about that, only about MS doing it. Weird.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    15. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Jaruzel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, PIFs are now legacy.

      On 2000,XP and 2003 DOS apps settings are now held in two places, the registry and inside the .LNK file (the actual shortcut).

      However, PIFs are still supported execution-wise in the OS to maintain backwards compatiblity - something that *shuold* have been eradicated/managed-out with XPs SP2 and all it's 'security' updates - something along the lines of:

      'You've have tried to run the file CelineDionNaked.jpg.pif, this may not be a legitimate application. Choose Run to run the file, Delete to delete the file, and Update to convert to a Windows XP icon.'

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    16. Re:lol no this is not a virus by volsung · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I've seen more than one person suggest a filter which would junk messages which contain more than X% (say 2-5%) misspellings. This would not only eliminate all that foreign spam which you can't read anyway, but a great many "English" spams which contain all sorts of garbage to fool keyword filters. Of course, spammers will compensate by padding emails with 98% Shakespeare, so that advantage won't last long.

      As a fringe benefit it will also filter out anyone who can't be bothered to spell most of their email correctly, which might be handy for those who receive crazy rants due to their online postings. :)

    17. Re:lol no this is not a virus by troon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      if everyone used proper spelling and grammer, computer comprehension (and filtering) would be able to improve.

      QED. It may interest you to know how many ways there are to spell Viagra...

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    18. Re:lol no this is not a virus by jim_v2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We have users that are already downloading zip files, opening then, running the executable and getting infected. Is it really that much harder to also check a box in order to get infected? I don't think it would make a difference.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    19. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not only that, but MacOS (even back to version 1) makes it really easy to disguise a executable as any other type of file. And from version 7.0 on, you can even paste any icon over any type of file.

      But yes, nobody complains except when Microsoft does stuff like this. Goofy.

      What's even goofier is that in OS X, as far as I can figure, "show file extension" is a file-specific flag, not a user-specific flag. Unless I'm missing something, it's impossible to get OS X to show file extensions on all files all the time.

    20. Re:lol no this is not a virus by _xeno_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Windows NT/2000/XP already have this (sorta). You can set execute privileges on files, just like in UNIX.

      However, a default Windows XP install will be set up to inherit all permissions from the root of the drive, and will have the Users group set to Read, Execute, and Traverse Directories. So everything you download is by default executable, and no program I know of ever bothers to unset that. (Actually, the latest version of IE will store some metadata with executable files downloaded through it that marks the file as being "untrusted," but I think that only Windows Explorer (basically, IE itself) actually respects that metadata.)

      The other thing you need to understand is that, like UNIX, you can essentially exec (on Windows, ShellExecute ) any file on the system. Unlike UNIX, though, the kernel won't actually try and interpret the file. Instead the Windows API (I think) will look up the file type and send the file off to the approriate handler. So when you call ShellExecute, you're essentially acting like the user clicked on the file in Windows Explorer. To most programs like AIM, there's no difference between executing another program and opening a file in its viewer. As far as I know, there's really no way of asking Windows "are you going to just look at that, or actually run that?"

      The basic point here is that while Windows XP (and NTFS) do support an Executable flag, by default it's always on. Plus the "launch file" API will also run programs, and there's really no way to be certain that a file you're launching won't essentially be an executable.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    21. Re:lol no this is not a virus by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure it would. Just don't tell them how to do it.

      Seriously. I think if you're too dumb to be able to right click, select properties, click the permissions tab, and select "execute", apply, and ok, then you should not be able to install the latest "Hello Kitty" mouse pointer or whatever other crap you've managed to download.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    22. Re:lol no this is not a virus by eMartin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "You've have tried to run the file CelineDionNaked.jpg.pif, this may not be a legitimate application. Choose Run to run the file, Delete to delete the file, and Update to convert to a Windows XP icon."

      For many people, that sentence would mean nothing other than "hit run to proceed".

    23. Re:lol no this is not a virus by gg3po · · Score: 3, Insightful
      'You've have tried to run the file CelineDionNaked.jpg.pif, this may not be a legitimate application. Choose Run to run the file, Delete to delete the file, and Update to convert to a Windows XP icon.'

      Anyone that would even be remotely interested in clicking on a file that was labeled CelineDionNaked.* has more immediate and serious issues than their pWn3d w1nbl03s box.

      --
      ---
    24. Re:lol no this is not a virus by gg3po · · Score: 4, Funny
      My favorite book title is "AOL for Dummies".

      ME TOO!!!

      --
      ---
    25. Re:lol no this is not a virus by NatasRevol · · Score: 2, Informative

      In at least Panther and Tiger:

      Finder>Preferences>Advanced

      Tick the Show all file extensions box.

      Enjoy .app all over the place.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    26. Re:lol no this is not a virus by MoogMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can imagine it now:

      dingALing!

      "lol no this is not a virus. but u gotta chown root:root notavirus; chmod o+xS notavirus to read it!"

    27. Re:lol no this is not a virus by krakelohm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the problem is that you would still have 90% of the people running something.jpg.exe even if they saw the extention. Most people still have no clue what '.exe' is, but since there is a '.jpg' they would still double click it thinking its a picture.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    28. Re:lol no this is not a virus by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This user that somehow managed to Run Explorer, clicked Tools ... Folder Options, clicked the View tab and unticked "Hide file extensions of known file types".

      (we'll ignore the WTF of unhiding something by unticking it)

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    29. Re:lol no this is not a virus by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This should be moderated 'Insightful', not 'Funny'.

      Seriously, the problem is user education. People believe ANYTHING that appears on their computer screens, much in the same way people believe ANYTHING that appears on the TV news.

      The problem we have is that too many people lack the critical thinking skills necessary to operate a computer (or watch the TV news).

    30. Re:lol no this is not a virus by rolandog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ha! This reminds me soem advice a friend of mine gave to me: "If you want your pr0n folder to be untouched: compress it, delete the original, and change the archive's extension to *.dll. Nobody wants to mess with a 1 GB *.dll."

    31. Re:lol no this is not a virus by 6350' · · Score: 2, Funny

      I deeply want to see two instances of the virus chat with eachother.

    32. Re:lol no this is not a virus by g00z · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've have tried to run the file CelineDionNaked.jpg.pif, this may not be a legitimate application. Choose Run to run the file, Delete to delete the file, and Update to convert to a Windows XP icon.'

      Even if that file was a legitimate image, the damage done to my soul would be far worse than any virus could do to my computer.

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    33. Re:lol no this is not a virus by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's my point; hiding the file type in the meta-data makes it *very* each to make "jpeg" file that has the icon for a "jpeg" file but is actually an application. And since you need ResEdit, or an equivalent utility, to see the actual metadata that determines this, it's very hard to detect. Or you can hit apple-i (File|Get Info for the keyboard impaired) and look at the file type. OS X applications are actually folders, which you can't just download (they have to be tarred or zipped, then unpackaged on your end, THEN run). Command line executables cannot be run at all by clicking (unless you jump through some hoops) -- you have to open a terminal. I think the Mac has resisted major trojan attack because its users are less likely to click on anything in reach of their mouse. You're right though. The system keeps track of Apps and gives you a warning if, say, Safari.app has changed. This system should just be extended so the first time you run any app the system says "Hey, this is an app I've never seen before. Shall we really run it?"

    34. Re:lol no this is not a virus by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Funny

      What we need to do is start running news reports that say "Playing hopscotch on the interstate is now deemed safe by scientists" and let the problem solve itself.

    35. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Xyde · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Show all file extensions" under Preferences in the Finder. OS X is pretty smart too, even if it's turned off, if you make a file like "pamela_nude.jpg.app" it will show the full extension cause it knows you're trying to be sneaky :)

    36. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Wes+Janson · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would truly be a PKD moment, when average Joe is being bombarded by advertising messages that also contain large portions of Hamlet and Romeo & Juliet attached at the bottom. Surreal.

    37. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Jaruzel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well a little bit of playing around on my system (having never tried to conceal an EXE for malicious purposes before), and it seems that if you take MyProgram.exe and rename it to MyProgram.jpg.pif, Windows just runs it as if it was an EXE. The trouble is, like .LNK files, .PIF extensions are permenantly hidden regardless of whether you have 'show extensions for known file types' ticked or not, consequently, MyProgram.jpg.pif appears as MyProgram.jpg, and theres nothing a user can do about it. By manipulating the icon inside MyProgram so it looks like the standard jpeg icon, you can totally fool the user.

      Trying to convert a non-pif PIF file into a LNK just would not work, and an error box would be thrown up ('Not a real shortcut file, do you want to delete it?')

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
  2. Viruses have always talked to you by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Informative

    Anyone remember "give me a cookie?"

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  3. What is this, a turing test? by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Question: How can you tell you are talking to a virus on AIM?

    Answer: It sounds more intelligent than a normal user

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:What is this, a turing test? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Funny

      Q: How many AIM Users does it take to propagate a worm
      A: OMG 1337.101

      Q: What's the difference between the average AIM user and a Worm
      A: One is slimy , insidious , hard to get rid of and invades your system , the other is a self replicating program able to propagate over a network

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:What is this, a turing test? by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not so much that the worm passes the Turing test, as the users fail the Gnirut test.

  4. say goodbye.... by xao+gypsie · · Score: 4, Funny

    To every 13 year old in the US and europe.....

    --


    xao
    http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
    1. Re:say goodbye.... by rbochan · · Score: 4, Funny

      You say this likes it's a bad thing ;o)

      Now if this would only hit battlenet servers...

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
  5. It's not the first small app that will talk to you by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A.L.I.C.E.

    This is a small app and she will talk with you - pretty well. So the fact these guys use something similar (it might even be this app) is no big surprise.

    That's why I use Trillian..I still haven't figured out how come it won't let me download files, or even get pictures from other people or even do any kind of direct connect :D

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  6. The next generation by QuaintRealist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Honestly (and no, I'm not a programmer), the potential here scares me. It seems to me that "interactive" automated intrusion is going to be a serious issue for security. Yes, the truly prudent are (as usual) safe, but the gap between the "luser" and people like me and my co-workers is going to get smaller.

    I really do have some of our local users using vmplayer virtual machines to access the internet (the ones with Windows laptops) - and a lot of services shut down (chat, in particular) that some would like to use.

    Those who know more than I (most of you) - any comments?

    --
    Using plain ol' text since 1968
    1. Re:The next generation by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, just wait until the AI gets more advanced. Then it will first sit silently on your computer for a while and watch your chatting behaviour. And then it will try to imitate you.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:The next generation by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, you misunderstood. It would at first sit there and watch you, and then, after it has learned enough about your behaviour, it contacts your buddies and tries to look like you to them.
      For example, it could catch typical phrases you use, as well as about what topic you chat with whom. That way, it could manage to not only chat from your account, but at the same type look so "typically you" that your buddies would more likely accept them as you, and therefore download the virus file (the stated contents of which would also be adapted, so if you typically chat with one of your buddies about programming, then it may e.g. claim to have found a great new code analysis tool, while to the other buddy you are talking about movies with, it would be e.g. a trailer to a new movie).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  7. yes! by Tachikoma · · Score: 2, Funny

    finnaly someone will talk to me on aim

    --
    i don't care
  8. Turing Test by fuyu-no-neko · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's 2 ways to pass the Turing Test: make the program more intelligent, or pick examiners who are more dumb. Virus writers pick the later option.

    --
    Don't take the above poster too seriously. He doesn't.
  9. Not a virus post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tell me more about now they will even talk to you.

  10. er... by escay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    wouldn't an unknown new name on the buddy list sending you a package with the message "lol no its not a virus" be a dead giveaway?

  11. If it's so smart... by Brent+Spiner · · Score: 5, Funny

    how do I know that the virus didn't submit this Slashdot article? Maybe it's just propagating more lies.

    /Puts tin-foil hat on

    --
    Reality test... am I dreaming?
    1. Re:If it's so smart... by Marsala · · Score: 4, Funny

      lol no it's not a virus

    2. Re:If it's so smart... by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, I'm having trouble convincing myself that most Slashdot posts are not written by a virus.

      --

      It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
    3. Re:If it's so smart... by bcmm · · Score: 5, Funny

      We have a new /. meme on our hands people...

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    4. Re:If it's so smart... by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 2, Funny

      $sys$meme

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
  12. I'm holding out for the one that actually talks... by Vokkyt · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, typing its own message is good and all, but not that impressive or scary. Now, when it is able to hijack the read text feature and play psychological mind tricks on me, that's impressive:

    "Click the link Dave...why haven't you clicked the link? Do you not like me any more? If you don't, I could just go over here in the corner and format myself...after all, you don't like me anymore, else you would click the link..."

    The only way it can get better after that is changing psychological mind tricks to Jedi mind tricks:

    "You will click the link."

  13. Wow! by Youssef+Adnan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only on /. could you find stuff like "down load" then shortly followed by "its self". Somebody there doesn't like to put words together, probably...

  14. And when you remove the virus... by hal2814 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And when you remove the virus it says, "I'm scared, Dave."

  15. The newest front by sammy+baby · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The virus will reply 'lol no this is not a virus.'


    My friends, we are fighting a war: a war on stupidity.

    And clearly, we are losing.
    1. Re:The newest front by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My friends, we are fighting a war: a war on stupidity.

      It's sort of like natural selection for computer users, except somebody else keeps coming in and fixing their computers...

    2. Re:The newest front by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know, honestly, we've been fighting stupidity for quite some time now. More and more it seems like most of my fellow Americans want someone else to take responsibility, and someone else to take care of their problems for them. There's a general lack of desire to be intelligent or self-reliant. With advancing technology, more and more people begin to fall behind... it's getting to a point where people just aren't smart enough to take care of themselves.

      --
      "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
    3. Re:The newest front by dr_d_19 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. What you are talking has been occuring for a very long time in the United States. Why is that every piece of gear or electronics device comes with a "DO NOT"-list longer than Microsofts EULAs? Or why we got EULAs in the first place? Are these people perhaps a bit scared of being sued?

      I'm convinced that with a less embracing justice system, these would not exist. If people know they can sue over some hot coffee, and know it has been done in the past, they'll drink everything without "CAUTION: HOT" without a hesitation.

      Why should you think for yourself when you do not have to?

  16. Landshark! by erroneus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why does this remind me of the old SNL Landshark routine?

  17. Solution by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The virus hides users from seeing the messages sent out to members of their buddy list. Viruses are evolving; now they will even talk to you."

    That's why I Touring-test every single person I ever chat with on IM clients. Sure, no one really wants to talk to me after 30 questions, but I kinda like sitting in an empty chat room.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:Solution by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny
      That's why I Touring-test every single person I ever chat with on IM clients.

      You mean you invite that person for a touring trip and consider anyone who rejects that offer as AI?
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  18. What would happen if... by squoozer · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...sombody added the virus to their buddy list. It would start chating with itself. Download itself and then infect itself thus commiting suiside. A cunning ploy, I think, to rid the world of this problem.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:What would happen if... by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, sounds like you should be working for Berman and Braga!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  19. Does this mean? by BushCheney08 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does this mean that September is almost over?

    --
    Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    1. Re:Does this mean? by kbahey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just to put some context, this is a reference to the September that never ended.

  20. People are lazy these days... by jacobcaz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    • lol no this is not a virus
    So it will sound like almost every other meat-head out there using instant messaging? It will blend right in! I have received less comprehendable IMs from people who would consider it a mortal sin to be anything other than professional in person or on paper.

    Why does all respect for grammar and spelling (and not sounding like a 12 year old) go out the window when instant messaging technology is involed (especially in a business setting)?

    1. Re:People are lazy these days... by jacobcaz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Because time is money even in the IM world.

      Time is indeed valuable, but where in a professional setting would the equilivent of "lol" be acceptable? I can't think of anywhere I would use that, and in person or in writing most "professionals" would never dream of using that type of reduced language either.

      If a person is really so busy as to be bombarded by instant messages non-stop, maybe they should evaluate what percentage are really critical and ignore the rest? That time/money saying is really all about time management!

      A great book about Time Management (by the way) is "The Time Trap" by R. Alec MacKenzie.

    2. Re:People are lazy these days... by beanyk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have received less comprehendable IMs from people who would consider it a mortal sin to be anything other than professional in person or on paper.


      Umm ... I think you meant comprehensible . [Yes, I know I'm being petty.]
    3. Re:People are lazy these days... by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Because time is money even in the IM world. With probably hundreds of people on that person's buddy list, chances are they're talking to multiple people at once. Why use proper grammar to talk to one person when you can ignore netiquette and talk to five people in the same time?

      What rot. If you're using IM for business purposes, you'd better be spending more time thinking about what to say than you spend saying it. Legally, you're putting this stuff in writing. They could log what you say over IM and use it against you later.

      Assuming you are spending more time thinking about what to say than actually doing the mechanical work of typing it, then the benefit in terms of time between 'u' and 'you' becomes trivial, while the benefit in terms of your professional image between 'you' and 'u' is just as significant.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:People are lazy these days... by Fandango · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's why I added some autotext entries on my Sidekick to convert "u" into "you", "ur" into "your", "u're" into "you're", "b4" into "before", "l8r" into "later", etc. Now I can thumb-type more quickly and not sound like a luser.

      --

      --
      Jake

  21. Not too intelligent by mcb · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've gotten this from several people on my list in the past few days... it basically spams a message, usually the same one, every hour or so, with the same link. It just fakes the address, the real link is to: http://209.235.17.26/My_Christmas_Card.SCR

    (06:41:27) xxxx: This AIM user has sent you a Christmas Card! To open it please visit: http://greetings.aol.com/index.pd?source=greetings card?my_christmas_card.scr
    This senders personal note: Merry Christmas!
    (06:41:27) yyyy : Sorry, I ran out for a bit!
    (08:42:59) xxxx: This AIM user has sent you a Christmas Card! To open it please visit: http://greetings.aol.com/index.pd?source=greetings card?my_christmas_card.scr
    This senders personal note: Merry Christmas!

  22. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by DickBreath · · Score: 3, Informative

    ELIZA type programs of various flavors have been around for decades, and ran on computers that were very slow / small by today's standards. Heck, an Eliza-style program, and even its LISP interpreter could fit in 64K, or easily on half a megabyte. And that is the runtime requirement. The code itself could easily be a minor addon to a modern day malware.

    If you read some classic LISP texts, such as Norvig's book on AI using Common Lisp, or another book The Elements of Artificial Intelligence, and other classic texts, there are probably a lot of algorithms that could be used.

    Turn the spread of the malware into some kind of gameplay problem and use AI algorithms to optimize the "gameplay" of the spread?

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  23. Quake 2 Ratbot by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone who played Quake2 must be familiar with ratbot. It would respond with "Yeah !!! I am a R A T B O T !!!!! ?? " or "Please help me !!! What is a bot ??" if someone's message included the text "ratbot". This worm reminds me of that... annoying, but in a really funny way.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  24. I saw Hackers by ennerseed · · Score: 2, Funny

    Viruses have been able to talk to you for a decade, man get with it.

    --
    "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" - Albert Einstein
  25. The Enemy by Moby+Cock · · Score: 4, Funny

    'lol no this is not a virus.'

    That is exactly what a virus would say. The response should be:

    lol, yeah, I AM a virus!!!1!!

    That would be unstoppable.

    1. Re:The Enemy by Technically+Inept · · Score: 2, Funny
      lol no this is not a virus

      You can't fool me... I know you're that clever virus.

      Actually, I'm only a dolphin, ma'am.

      A dolphin? Well then I guess it would be ok to cl-aaaaaaargh!

      --
      Now watch me hit this drive.
  26. Well, my house is safe! by Tiberius_Fel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My house is safe. We switched my teenaged sister to a Mac, and the number of viruses entering the house quickly dropped to zero. No matter how many times I said "Don't click on the link you get in IMs...". Problem solved!

    --
    Join the Empire! http://www.empirereborn.net/
  27. These lusers don't know and they don't care by Secrity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These are the same people who also don't know and don't care that they allowed music disks to install rootkits and backdoors on their computers.

  28. Re:Eliza Virus? by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Let me know when it will have hot N3TS3X with you, and I'm in!

    The frightening thing is, that would probably be pretty easy to code. The net is full of freely-available pornographic stories; extract a whole bunch of phrases from those, use an Eliza-like system to select the right one for the circumstances and incorporate elements of what the user just said into your response...

    You could write up a pretty effective cybersex bot, and you could program it to offer to send across 'cam pix' once in a while. Which would, of course, be virus-ridden.

    Better yet, once you've written it you could have it communicate with sad lusers via SMS at, oh, 20p per message. And make a killing. Excuse me, I have an Eliza-bot to hack up with some pornography. bbl, d00dz.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  29. If your AIM responds with... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What happen?" "What !" "What You Say !!" "It's You !!" "HA HA HA HA ...." That may be a clue to walk away at that point.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  30. Viruses are evolving? by nekoniku · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Viruses are evolving

    Seriously now, are viruses really evolving or is it just that the techniques used by virus writers are evolving? And my Inner Philosopher wants to know if there's a difference and if this has anything to do with Intelligent Design.

    I better stop now.

    --
    "It's a wonderful idea. But it doesn't work." -- Tad Danielewski
  31. Eliza flashbacks by Havenwar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Always interesting to see how virus technology evolves. But this... well just reminds me of a t-shirt note I saw somewhere... "Because there is no patch for human stupidity."

    Some people just can not be educated.

  32. Good! by Moby+Cock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Viruses are evolving; now they will even talk to you

    Good! At least something will! The wife has been giving me the cold shoulder since the ... incident.

  33. LOL by jayayeem · · Score: 5, Funny

    This post is not a troll

    --
    I metamoderate, therefore I am
  34. Re:Not so tough... by Amouth · · Score: 2

    now your just being mean..

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  35. Integrated AI by Durzel · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm surprised these AIM worms haven't yet integrated with those award-winning AI bots used to fool other humans (e.g. Jabberwacky or ALICE).

    Having said that, when I asked Jabberwacky "Is this a virus?" it said "Well, I hope so." Not very reassuring..

  36. I Remember The Old Days by gadlaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember the old days when you'd actually get a message from someone who was a human being. Haven't seen this AIM spam bit but there is one in ICQ which is pretty crude. Says hi then sends it's link if you respond. Of course the bots have no info on themselves, have hidden ips and are easy to spot as the bots they are. The people who create and unlease these things belong in the same jail with the email spammers.

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  37. Now if the worm could just post on slashdot... by aapold · · Score: 3, Funny

    and ilnk the site... well, it would be unstoppable until the site crashed. But I'm sure someone would mirror the virus so it could keep rolling...

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  38. Re:How dumb can you be? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny
    > Now if the NormalUser thinks it's someone normal talking to them, he's quite dumb.

    Uhhhhhhhh...

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  39. Re:The one I got is much worse.. by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's called W32.Girlfriend.M and not only does it talk, it won't shut the hell up!

    Your mother is not your girlfriend. And when she tells you to shave your beard, to stop eating so many Fritos, and to get a job, you should listen to her!

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  40. My conversation by Sheepdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    A conversation I had with my littlest sister this morning:

    missmag: http://myspace04.myphotos.cc/clarissa17.pif
    missmag: lol thats cool
    sheep.: what is cool? It's a pif, don't run those.
    missmag: lol no its not its a virus
    sheep.: holy crap, you're finally trying to follow in your brother's footsteps?
    missmag: lol thats cool
    sheep.: damn straight, I'll download it now. Let's see which of us can figure out what it does first. It'll be a game!
    missmag: lol no its not its a virus
    sheep.: uhhh.. I'm noticing that you're repeating yourself.
    missmag: lol thats cool
    sheep.: oh okay, I didn't know that's what kids were into now.
    missmag: http://myspace04.myphotos.cc/clarissa17.pif
    sheep.: yeah, I knew myspace was a big hit.
    sheep.: back in my day it was BBSing, we used to trade porn for games and games for porn.
    missmag: lol thats cool
    sheep.: yeah, it got to be really popular community-wise, but I guess you all like myspace cause it's the new "hip" thing, right?
    missmag: lol no its not, its a virus
    sheep.: yeah I was thinking the same thing about livejournal
    missmag: lol thats cool
    sheep.: Okay now I'm certain there's something wrong, Maggie, are you there?
    missmag: lol no its not, its a virus
    sheep.: ...

  41. "...Viruses are evolving; now they will even talk by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Viruses are evolving; now they will even talk to you."

    Dear esteemed friend,

    Allow me to introduce myself. I am Dr. Ebola and am employed by the Ugandan ministry of oil...

  42. Next step, EBAY. by neo · · Score: 5, Funny

    The computer will take over your computer, and then start selling off items in your house that it can see in your webcam on ebay, paid to it's own paypal account. After the money comes in, it will ditch your computer leaving you with a negative score on ebay.

    In terminator we gave the computer the ability to control everything, but in the real world they'll just take it for themselves.

  43. Note by Sheepdot · · Score: 5, Informative

    Note: The slashdot article says 'lol no this is not a virus.' The CNET article says "lol no its not its a virus".

  44. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by AnotherLostAtom · · Score: 2, Informative

    Send the trillian crew an e-mail about it and/or upgrade to the latest bought version of trillian. The free version sux and the hacked versions concentrate on keeping the chat functionality, but tend to forget about extras. Trillian rules, I use it too :)

  45. Re:Not everything is a "war". by sammy+baby · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'm not sure why Americans see fit to label nearly every struggle a "war". There is the "War" on Drugs, "War" on Terror, and now this "War" on Stupidity that you're babbling about.

    Perhaps it is because you have not experienced true war, as much of Europe and the rest of the work has. Sure, you can talk about the American Civil War, but that conflict pales in comparison to the real conflict that Europe witnessed during the first half of the 20th century.


    My friends, we are fighting a war: a war on humor.

    And clearly, we have lost.
  46. The dawn of AI/Better Turing Test. by freality · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If this technique keeps on working after a while, virus writers will have effectively passed the Turing test. Though as predicted, the Turing test will end up saying more about itself (and us) than AI. Perhaps there should be a Turing Test++ that identifies AI as intelligence capable of distinguishing a human from a virus bot soley by communication over IM.

  47. Re:This is old school by plover · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That said, people still have AV. There's still stinger. AOL might even be able to release an update that blocks where it's hooking into the main AIM program (which would, of course, be very stop gap)

    I don't understand why AOL doesn't simply apply anti-bot filters when this crap is discovered. No IM protocols in use today are peer-to-peer based, they are all server based (otherwise firewalls would have prevented IM from taking off amongst the Joe Sixpack crowd.)

    These bots all have distinctive signatures, how hard could it possibly be to pinch them off at the server side? They could do other things, too, such as IM'ing the infected client from Admin to say "Busted, O virus-laden one. Please update your antivirus software and only then will we allow you back onto our servers."

    Seems like an ounce of prevention to me ...

    --
    John
  48. Already exists by Chemisor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hi, I'm a signature virus. Copy it into your sig to help me spread!

  49. From the TFA..... by RITMaloney · · Score: 4, Funny
    "When receiving a link in an instant message, the best practice is to verify with the sender if the link was sent intentionally or not."

    S7uP3D UZ3R: Did you mean to send this? Or is it a virus or something?

    SMERT VIRI: lol no this is not a virus

    S7uP3D UZ3R: Kewl! Thnx 4 the link!

    Journalists!

  50. Liza virus next? by Golias · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Why do you say I'm a virus?"
    "How does thinking I'm a virus make you feel?"
    "What do you mean by that?"
    "Come, come. Elucidate your feelings."

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  51. This reminds me of MOM AND DAD SAVE THE WORLD by evilninjax · · Score: 2, Funny
    There's the Light Grenade that will disintegrate anyone who picks it up. The catch is that it has the words, "PICK ME UP" written on it.

    "We've lost thousands of men to this insidious weapon."

    "Well why don't you just NOT pick it up?"

    ....?!

    -goro-

  52. Not terribly new by eclipz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been getting spam messages and some really bad bot messages on Yahoo! messenger for quite awhile. Most of them start out asking if you'd like to chat, then send you a link for their webcam site. Quite a few chat sites on the internet have become bot havens, with rooms filled with more bots than people trying to fish for people stupid enough to click on links. Also, on sites such as MySpace, there are bots that will create profiles that look real and then send messages out asking for people to visit and click on their homesite. I'm not terribly surprised that a worm found its way into AIM. Although it does rely on the same thing all the others do: gullibility.

  53. Light Grenade by intangible · · Score: 2, Funny

    This makes me think of the "Light Grenade" from "Mom and Dad Save the World". The most diabolical doomsday device ever invented; it has "pick me up" printed on the side!

  54. Re:Eliza Virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I put on my robe and wizard hat.

  55. progress in AI by penguin-collective · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some people may be tempted to misinterpret this that there has been considerable progress in AI (artificial intelligence). Actually, however, this is more indicative of progress in NS (natural stupidity).

  56. Uhh... Windows DOES have the Execute "bit" by AKosygin · · Score: 5, Informative

    On NTFS formatted filesystems, you can use the ACL to default set it so that all files saved will not have the "Execute File" permission. You just deselect "Allow" for the line that says "Traverse Folder / Execute File" for the "CREATOR OWNER" entry and "Apply onto" "Files Only" for the scope and allow propagation down.

    Or, you can go into your Group Policy Object (Local Computer or Domain) and by default in your Software Restrictions Policy disallow execution unless they were in areas of the file system you designate, I.E.: "Program Files" folder. And if I remember correctly, saved files from current versions of IM programs are saved in "My Documents" outside of the "Program Files" folder by default.

  57. Yup by tacokill · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yep. That's exactly the plan. Thanks for your comment.

    Sincerely,
    The US Government

  58. Re:Turing tests by wk633 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Turing test is turning out not to be a test of artificial intelligence, but of human stupidity.

  59. Trust me by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please post your banking information here. lol, this am not a phishing atempt!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  60. get free sheikh speare! by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Of course, spammers will compensate by padding emails with 98% Shakespeare

    Well, at least you would have an interesting read in you inbox everyday; maybe one could develop some sort of persistant distributed storage scheme involving spam :-)
    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  61. AIMFix removes these by jayloden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wrote and maintain a free AIM / IM specific antivirus tool called AIMFix that removes these two worms in several variations. I've been working with this stuff since 2003 (AIMFix is used by dozens of Universities as part of official cleaning procedure and recommendations, see the users page for details). In particular, these two worms have been eating all of my free time for the last three or four days with several variants and some new behavior (installing as services only, rather than registry keys all over the place, etc). They're also hiding as Windows filenames, but in different directories, like C:\Windows\svchost.exe (instead of system32), C:\Windows\taskmgr.exe, etc.

    It is so incredibly weird seeing these stories in the media. I've been so deep into researching them and writing updates to AIMFix to keep abreast of everything that it comes as a total surprise to see a media outlet cover them. I've gotten countless emails from people who got hit by these two worms, and I've become quite familiar with the symptoms over the past few days, yet at the same time I'm uniquely ignorant of the rest of the story (the AI aspect, etc) because I only end up dealing with the nitty gritty that happens on the symptoms and removal level. Go figure.

    -Jay

    1. Re:AIMFix removes these by jayloden · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dammit slashdot...that link was supposed to be http://jayloden.com/aimfix.htm

      If you want the binary only: http://jayloden.com/AIMFix.exe

  62. Re:This is old school by jayloden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure...and they could also put a big fat warning symbol next to urls that end in executables and tell people "this is a program!" before they download it.

    They could probably even set up filters to prevent blacklisted urls from even being transmitted. Hell, with AOL's money and power it's highly likely they could get most of the virus sites shut down much faster than you or I can.

    But if there's one thing I've learned in the years I've been fighting the IM virus battle, it's that AOL doesn't do a damn thing until it's so huge that they *have* to do something, or the media gets involved enough to make it an issue. I deal with this crap every single day. I create definitions for new virus variants for my AIMFix software, answer hundreds of emails from (usually virus infected) users, and analyze various bits and pieces of the malware themselves. Hell, I've even tracked the authors down to their home address & phone in a couple of cases. It's not like AOL couldn't take care of all of this if they really wanted to. Hell, they could even just pay me to do it full time - I work cheap ;) But the honest truth is that they don't care unless they have to. When it comes to the scale of priorities, welfare of the users hardly even registers for AOL. What matters is revenue, and unless the virus(es) directly impact revenue, they could care less.

    It's often frustrating to me that a relatively minor investment on the part of AOL (and other parties, I might add) could make my life a lot less busy and make the life of a virus writer that much more difficult. It's hard to see dozens of people email me in one weekend because they had their passwords stolen and their account hijacked, or hear from thousands of frustrated and upset people whose computer is suddenly a mess of spyware and ads. I can't even imagine what it'd be like to have your screen name sending out IMs to all of your friends, infecting them with the very same unpleasantness while you sit there helpless. Sure, much of that can be attributed to the end user, but AOL sits in a position to help save a lot of these people from themselves and they just aren't interested.

    -Jay

  63. Finally! by PooR_IndiaN · · Score: 2, Funny


    Somebody will chat with me!