Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft to Enter Handheld Market?

eldavojohn wrote to mention that, via Joystiq, he read an article over at BusinessWeek that indicates Microsoft may be working on a portable media device. The article states that, if they are, they're not just going after the iPod. The plan would include a way to leverage a powerful part of the Microsoft empire: games. From the article: "Microsoft would probably use the Xbox brand to market the gadget. 'I think the brand is an opportunity,' Moore says. True, perhaps, but also risky. If the new device comes with the Xbox brand, most consumers will view it as a game player, like Sony's PlayStation Portable. That might limit its appeal, since the portable gaming market is much smaller than the one for digital media." A funny comment, considering the success of the DS.

177 comments

  1. A Third Portable? by Excors · · Score: 5, Informative
    This subject was on Gamasutra a short while ago: A Third Portable?

    Last week Gamasutra asked our professional audience, "What hardware capabilities and software would be needed for a third company to create a competitive rival to the Nintendo DS and Sony PSP, and which companies might be capable of doing so? Should they try?"

    [...] Of the cited companies who might possibly compete in this area, Apple and Microsoft were by far the most mentioned, with many readers citing Xbox Live and iTunes as superior distribution mediums.

    1. Re:A Third Portable? by flynt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For me, the main point of this should be to interface with Windows Media Center. I still have to go through a two or three step process to get recorded TV onto my iPod. I guess I don't see much point to such a device, but maybe someone would.

    2. Re:A Third Portable? by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      Fourth portable. The DS is -not- the new version of the Game Boy, nor is it the Game Boy's replacement.

    3. Re:A Third Portable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Microsoft to Enter the [insert market name here] Market?

      Awser: Yes
    4. Re:A Third Portable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already have 770 Linux pda. Works very well for watching movies and tv programs (Latest news etc. as in real player format over wlan)
      The screen is really nice (800x480) for pda.

      http://www.nokia.co.uk/nokia/0,8764,83163,00.html

  2. I can see it now. by Musteval · · Score: 5, Funny

    XBox Portable. Only two cubic feet. Weighs less than twenty pounds. A whopping megabyte of RAM.

    --
    Note to mods: I'm probably being sarcastic.
    1. Re:I can see it now. by minginqunt · · Score: 1

      No Gigabit wireless. Larger than an an iPod Pico. Lame.

    2. Re:I can see it now. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn. You beat me to it. I was going to joke that it will weigh in at 10 pounds (it's an uber-convenient luggable!), take full size DVDs, have a 17" screen, and will be marketed by Microsoft as the next step in "Portable" (*cough*) entertainment. Millions of fan-boys will line up outside Best Buy for days for a fleeting chance to grab one. Instead, they'll be laughed at by the counter-person because there weren't enough units in stock to supply more than the first three people in line. Yet Microsoft will continue to hype it as more important than Windows 95, and the future of entertainment. Sound pretty close? :-P

    3. Re:I can see it now. by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      I'll only be impressed if they somehow manage to get the battery efficiency better than the Sega Nomad (which they won't).

    4. Re:I can see it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You've got it all wrong, the portable will be regular size, it's just going to take three lantern batteries.

    5. Re:I can see it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      LOLolol!!!!!1eleven XBox is hueg, amirite?

    6. Re:I can see it now. by lylum · · Score: 3, Funny

      >A whopping megabyte of RAM.

      You mean 640kb.... after all that is enough.

    7. Re:I can see it now. by darthservo · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention that it could also be used as a portable handwarmer, obtaining a temperature of 108 degrees Fahrenheit within seconds.

      --

      Prove it.

    8. Re:I can see it now. by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      And $300

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    9. Re:I can see it now. by pmjordan · · Score: 1

      Nonono, not 'XBox portable'! Surely they'll call it the YBoy!

      Now, don't ask me what the hell a ZBoz would be.

      ~phil

    10. Re:I can see it now. by freakmn · · Score: 1

      Is that how it provides the heat of three lanterns? That does sounds nice, as the winters here can get cold.

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    11. Re:I can see it now. by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      it's just going to take three lantern batteries.

      Wow. You're really being optimistic.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  3. They are having lots of porting problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...with the WinCE TBSOD (Tiny Blue Screen of Death).

  4. Go for it by minginqunt · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, it worked out so well for Sony. They'd be mad not to go for it.

    1. Release desirable, powerful handheld games console.
    2. Subsidize it up the bottom.
    3. Fail to release any games other than pointless ports of console games I already own.
    4. ???
    5. FAIL TO PROFIT!!!

    By the way, the '???' there was caused by my playing a spot of Mario Kart DS. I really should focus more when bleating at Slashdot.

    1. Re:Go for it by clontzman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fail to release any games other than pointless ports of console games I already own.
      ...

      By the way, the '???' there was caused by my playing a spot of Mario Kart DS


      In other words, the flagship game for the DS is a port of a console game you probably own on four other platforms already? ;-)

    2. Re:Go for it by minginqunt · · Score: 1

      Heh. I call that irony.

      Still, Mario Kart with wireless internet play rocks my world, boyo.

    3. Re:Go for it by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      And GTA is the second best thing I can do in the palm of my hand.

    4. Re:Go for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can a blind guy play GTA?

    5. Re:Go for it by Nicolasd · · Score: 1

      I fail to see where MK DS is a port of another game... A sequel yes... but not a port !

    6. Re:Go for it by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      It's not a pointless port ;)

    7. Re:Go for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that or masturbate...

    8. Re:Go for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In other words, the flagship game for the DS is a port of a console game you probably own on four other platforms already? ;-)


      Nope, it's actually yet another great entry in the Mario Kart series, not a port. Try again.

    9. Re:Go for it by rabbot · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that Mario Kart DS isn't a port. But that was a good try. Go reward yourself with some UMD movies.

    10. Re:Go for it by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      That was the joke.[/McBainFromSimpsons]

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    11. Re:Go for it by clontzman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except for the fact that Mario Kart DS isn't a port.

      Neither is GTA, neither is SOCOM, neither are any of the PSP games the OP had broadly suggested were "pointless ports."

      But that was a good try. Go reward yourself with some UMD movies.

      I was making a joke, hence the wink. I do think I'll play a little MLB 06 though...

    12. Re:Go for it by Nataku564 · · Score: 1

      Bleh ... only if you like button mashey racers. The only way to win online is to do that terrible snaking manuver. Power sliding on straightaways never used to be effective. Go Nintendo for supporting the twitch-jerk gamer and ruining what was once a fun game.

      Also ... WTF is up with no online battle mode? I mean, Nintendo totally dropped the ball there.

      They lost points with me on this one. Major points. Still above all their competetors by a margin, but its getting smaller ...

  5. It may be successful, but by szembek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At the same time the mp3 player market and video game market are completely different. While somebody who buys a portable game system might use built in mp3 player functionality, somebody looking for an mp3 player would not be interested in the overhead of a gaming system.

    --
    nothing
    1. Re:It may be successful, but by geekee · · Score: 1

      "At the same time the mp3 player market and video game market are completely different. While somebody who buys a portable game system might use built in mp3 player functionality, somebody looking for an mp3 player would not be interested in the overhead of a gaming system."

      Yes. In fact I'm always annoyed that my PC can play games. I wish it would only play mp3's. All that overhead is so annoying. The iPod will never play video either.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    2. Re:It may be successful, but by gabebear · · Score: 1

      Wow you must have been surprised when your $1000 20lb mp3 player came with the ability to play games!! The iPod is still primarily a MP3 player, technology has just advanced enough that including a good-enough video player is possible, kinda like cell phones with cameras. Almost nobody looking for a digital camera is going to consider a cellphone camera, although someone looking for a phone may be interested.

      Both the PSP and DS can be used as MP3 players, but the overhead(weight, cost, and fragility) make them less than desirable to anyone looking for an MP3 player.

  6. Alternate Uses by vjmurphy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not only will it be able to play games, music and movies, but like its larger sibling, it will also be a portable heater.

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
    1. Re:Alternate Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's cold here, I wouldn't mind a portable heater.

      Mabey they could advertise that during winter?

    2. Re:Alternate Uses by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      lol @ portable heater.

      dont forget the external battery pack the size of a nintendo ds itself.

    3. Re:Alternate Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean it won't be a backpack the size of a WWII radio, with optional jets?

  7. Inevitable by UltimaOmegaOblivion · · Score: 0

    This was bound to happen. Microsoft jumped on the console badwagon, and now they jump on the handheld bandwagon. Much like most other handhelds that tryed to compete against Nintendo, this may fail...

    --
    42. 'Nuff said.
  8. XBOX Handheld by th1ckasabr1ck · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm pretty sure it's just going to be a laptop.

    1. Re:XBOX Handheld by theManInTheYellowHat · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's just going to be a laptop.
      Considering the Bill Gates dream, wouldn't that be a TabletPC?

    2. Re:XBOX Handheld by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      What are the chances that I'll be able to play Zork or Rogue?

      Actually, I'd probably buy it for Angband...

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    3. Re:XBOX Handheld by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Or a slightly modified Oqo.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    4. Re:XBOX Handheld by ceeam · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's just going to be a rucksack.

    5. Re:XBOX Handheld by zlogic · · Score: 1

      It will be more like Compaq Portable.

  9. Now this I could live with by casualsax3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I never understood why Microsoft entered into the crowded, mature console market to begin with. I always thought it would have made more sense to go after Nintendo with their portable monopoly, back when the sub par GBA was the only game in town. Imagine what Microsoft could have done if they had launched a competing portable around the same time the Xbox came about. They would have crushed the GBA - no backlight, no FPU, only 2 face buttons. Instead they waited, and now they've got to face off against the GBA SP/Micro, the DS, AND the PSP. Why can't Microsoft pioneer something for once, instead of playing catchup?

    1. Re:Now this I could live with by idonthack · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has never pioneered, and probably never will. Every market they have success in, they waited until it was apparently profitable, and then bought or shoved out the nearest competitor.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    2. Re:Now this I could live with by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I never understood why Microsoft entered into the crowded, mature console market to begin with.

      Living room domination. It has little to do with winning the console market and more to do with getting into living rooms. Mind-share now, markets later.

    3. Re:Now this I could live with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What surprises me is that Microsoft decided to make any hardware at all. Why didn't they just offer the Live service on all existing consoles, leveraging their enormous pre-established MSN server network and making money hand over fist, instead of losing a cool $4B with under-utilized, ugly, and notably unpopular hardware?

      Live is the only thing they've done right so far, and its the part they make the most profit on too. Not sure what this whole "hardware" thing it about still.

    4. Re:Now this I could live with by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      "Why can't Microsoft pioneer something for once, instead of playing catchup?"

      good question... seems to be the entire corporate mantra as of late.

      i guess that MS was trying to do something like that with the x360, but they rushed to market instead of pioneering something extraordinary.

    5. Re:Now this I could live with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, day late dollar shor...umm wait a min.

    6. Re:Now this I could live with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Mind-share now, markets later."

      Better to move to some unmeasured metric when you are getting ASSRAPED by the competition in all real world ones...

    7. Re:Now this I could live with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose if you're going to do something already done, do it better.

    8. Re:Now this I could live with by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Unlike the proclamations of microsoft marketing, they don't really believe they will win in the operating system or office suite wars (but don't think they wont maintaining a suite of marketing deceit and other questionable activities to stave off the end for as long as possible and as a side note destroying the reputation of their executives in the process).

      The games console and media centre is an attempt to start shifting microsoft into other areas. Much the same as DRM licencing as well as the various other licencing schemes they are trying to break into. The hassle for them is every time they try a new area outside of the OS or office suite, they are either completely unsuccessfull or the achieve a moderate amount of success but lose money in the process.

      As a result of a string of less than successfull forays into new markets they are now becoming rather gun shy of making any new attempts because of the damage these failures are doing to their reputation and their share price.

      They most probably should have broken up the company into completely seperate entities years ago and use the capital assets to expand and grow those individual entities into new markets (hardware, internet, business software, entertainment), however the ego of a few executives who wanted to sit at the helm of what in their own minds was a megacorporation brought them down.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  10. Steve's Reality Distortion Field by binaryDigit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would appear that Steve's Reality Distortion field is effective even against the evil empire!.

  11. Excellent by UltimaOmegaOblivion · · Score: 0

    Great, I can't wait to pay 300 bucks to buy a system, only to find out MS made Sony's mistake and only inculded 1 analog stick. And then, they will port Halo but they won't even adjust the controls, so you will have to rely on a stick that isn't there to aim. And after 10 minutes of shooting straight in front of me, the lack of a heat sink will burn my hands into oblivion.

    --
    42. 'Nuff said.
  12. Their last portable... by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When their big push was portable music players a large percentage of their own employees used iPods. Even an executive said the iPod was better then what their hardware partners offered. If they can't get their own employees to use their portable products why would anyone else? Let's see if they repeat their last failure.

    1. Re:Their last portable... by Itchyeyes · · Score: 1

      From the article I read, it seems that a move into the portable device market stems more from the failure of Microsoft's hardware partners to produce something that can compete with the iPod rather than a desire to take on Nintendo and Sony at another level. I think this makes more sense since Microsoft probably views Apple as more of a threat to their overall corporate strategy than Sony or Nintendo. They probably would view gaming functionality as something that would differentiate such a device from the iPod rather than the primary function of the device.

    2. Re:Their last portable... by danpsmith · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Even an executive said the iPod was better then what their hardware partners offered.

      In my opinion the reason the iPod is and remains on top has nothing to do with hardware. It's a trendy thing to have, everyone has heard of it and wants one. Most of the people that got one for Christmas don't even know how to use it. There are better products on market. It's not the hardware, it's the name recognition.

      I bought an archos player for $250 that plays xvid movies, mp3s, games, displays photos, can link up to other USB devices, records wav files from line in or built in microphone and has RCA out capability (comes complete with cables). The ipod has hardly any of these features and retails for almost double the price. People buy ipods cuz they are hipsters.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    3. Re:Their last portable... by ab8ten · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I bought an archos player for $250 that plays xvid movies, mp3s, games, displays photos, can link up to other USB devices, records wav files from line in or built in microphone and has RCA out capability (comes complete with cables). The ipod has hardly any of these features and retails for almost double the price. People buy ipods cuz they are hipsters.

      And I bet that archos is really easy to use, right? And it ties in tightly with a really slick music, photo and video jukebox/store? And it automatically keeps in synch with your computer? And it's really small and light? Right?

      --
      I have no .sig
    4. Re:Their last portable... by FeloniousPunk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mod this guy up, grandparent simply Does Not Get It, and that mentality is why Apple's competition consistently fail to make a dent in the iPod's market share. I'm as far from a hipster as you can get (dumpy nerd, of course) but no way would I trade my iPod for some Rube Goldberg wonder toy like this archos player mentioned. The iPod does its job very well - plays music - it is reliable and elegant. People are tired of feature creep and the iPod's sales numbers show it.

      --
      I know this because Tyler knows this.
    5. Re:Their last portable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      95% uses windows. Please, can I here you defend windows like that. Please!!!

    6. Re:Their last portable... by danpsmith · · Score: 1
      And I bet that archos is really easy to use, right? And it ties in tightly with a really slick music, photo and video jukebox/store? And it automatically keeps in synch with your computer? And it's really small and light? Right?

      I'm not going to drum up an advertisement here, but most of what you said about it is in fact true, despite your sarcasm. It uses playsforsure, so those who love to shop online for music can do that, and it syncs with media player and there is an available plugin for Itunes (I don't use that anyway but whatever). Also, you can enable the device to be connected as a simple USB hard drive, allowing simple drag and drop from anything that supports USB class mass-storage. It's about the size of the original Ipod, a little bit longer than a pack of playing cards but thinner depth wise. The size was actually smaller than I imagined, which actually, I wouldn't really want a device any smaller than it is cuz I'd probably lose it. As far as easy to use, probably not the easiest to use, I'll give you that, but I can't imagine it would confuse the average person anymore than their ipod already does.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    7. Re:Their last portable... by danpsmith · · Score: 1

      People aren't tired of feature creep, they just aren't even knowing of an alternative. Ipod will eventually falter when someone else comes out with a killer app. If you like DRM go nuts with your bad self, at least with my player I can turn it off.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    8. Re:Their last portable... by FeloniousPunk · · Score: 1

      Ah, so that's the problem. Other people (iPod owners) are ignornant/ stupid, is all. Can't say I'm surprised to see you post that.

      --
      I know this because Tyler knows this.
    9. Re:Their last portable... by danpsmith · · Score: 1
      Ah, so that's the problem. Other people (iPod owners) are ignornant/ stupid, is all. Can't say I'm surprised to see you post that.

      Not so much stupid, but unwilling to put up with a learning curve, for one thing. Another thing is that they have a lot of the keeping up with the Jones' in them, and want to get an iPod cuz everyone else has one. Another thing is that most people won't take the time to research an alternative and will just pay the price. Simply cuz it's not a priority, or the alternative isn't well advertised. Just because something leads the market doesn't make it absolutely spectacular, look at MS Windows.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
  13. Playing catchup again. by gasmonso · · Score: 1

    For a company that has more money than most countries, I find them rather dull. Vista is boring, XBox 2 is blah, and this portable strikes me as dull. It just seems like MS has kinda faded in the background while newer more innovative companies have stolen the spotlight. When I hear MS, I just yawn.

    http://religiousfreaks.com/
    1. Re:Playing catchup again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you use as an OS, Dr. DOS?

      Unless I can do everything from a command prompt it isn't an OS H^H^H^H^H!!!!!!!

    2. Re:Playing catchup again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The portable strikes you as dull? There's little information about the *possible* portable other than speculation. If you something that doesn't even exist can strike you as dull, then you're obviously biased against the entire idea in the first place.

      You might want to wait until something actually exists to form an opinion about it.

  14. This could work by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What if Microsoft made a handheld gaming machine that only played games from Xbox Live Marketplace? What if they removed in-store purchasing of games alltogether?

    They would use the same business model for the 360 (buy a card at Best Buy, enter the code and download games). They could offer demos of each (same as the 360) and have all of the same competitive high score/leaderboard functions.

    The only way Microsoft would successfully enter the handheld market would be NOT to clone the PSP (which is a POS anyway).

    1. Re:This could work by DorkusMasterus · · Score: 1

      See, now that would be cool, but you'd have to (at least initially) bundle the handheld with the 360 console. That way, people would be all about downloading the content. I'd TOTALLY buy a handheld that could play geometry wars or gauntlet and all the mini-games stuff that live is shilling. Seriously, that would be a good idea, and I would buy it. It would be very much in line with their "commitment to making Live an example" in the industry. I say go for it, Gates!

    2. Re:This could work by CheechBG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You automatically assume that everyone in America (or the world) who would purchase one of these has a high-speed internet connection. In the real world, that doesn't happen.

      Plus, this would eat into the profit margins of the big retail stores. They will never allow that to happen.

    3. Re:This could work by oGMo · · Score: 1
      What if Microsoft made a handheld gaming machine that only played games from Xbox Live Marketplace? What if they removed in-store purchasing of games alltogether?

      Then all the stores who, you know, sell actual consoles and games, would hate them. No more game sales. No more used game sales. If I were EB/Gamestop, I'd be hard pressed to promote such a system. And without that, you just lost a huge portion of the market.

      They would use the same business model for the 360 (buy a card at Best Buy, enter the code and download games). They could offer demos of each (same as the 360) and have all of the same competitive high score/leaderboard functions.

      Except no one needs Live to do these things. Many PSP games already have highscore tracking functions (Infected, PQ, Twisted Metal, Wipeout, etc.), and I don't have to pay to subscribe to them.

      Paying for a console, a game, and then the ability to play it, is nice for Microsoft's bottom line, but it's terrible for the gamer. Especially one on a limited budget. Or a kid's parents.

      The only way Microsoft would successfully enter the handheld market would be NOT to clone the PSP (which is a POS anyway).

      Ah, parrot the party line. I hope they're paying you well over there to troll like this. The PSP is a beautiful piece of hardware, with a solid and growing lineup (see my collection for a list of many of them, still missing about 5), and some great additional functionality (movies, music, web).

      Since the PSP has recently been catching up again, Microsoft could do much worse than have something as successful as the PSP.

      Such as the X360.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    4. Re:This could work by Jearil · · Score: 1

      Ah, parrot the party line. I hope they're paying you well over there to troll like this. The PSP is a beautiful piece of hardware, with a solid and growing lineup (see my collection for a list of many of them, still missing about 5), and some great additional functionality (movies, music, web).

      Man, I so wish that were true. I bought a PSP the day it came out, had it preordered in fact. It looked so pretty, I nearly threw my DS away. Boy would that have sucked. Besides Lumines, there hasn't been a single original GOOD game for that system. Maybe they're making the games for Japan and they haven't gotten here yet or something, I don't know. But the games really need a boost. It's great for watching movies (on mem stick, UMDs are such a rip off), but memory is really expensive and the battery isn't all that great.

      PSP is ok for movies and maybe a very select few games. If you want a portable to actually play GAMES, get a DS or heck even a GBA SP. Sony focused too much on the media aspect and not the games. So sad.

    5. Re:This could work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ah, parrot the party line. I hope they're paying you well over there to troll like this."

      apparently you havent read his post history... THEY ARE!

    6. Re:This could work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Except no one needs Live to do these things. Many PSP games already have highscore tracking functions (Infected, PQ, Twisted Metal, Wipeout, etc.), and I don't have to pay to subscribe to them.


      Technically, leaderboards are part of (free) Xbox Live Silver. Granted, some DS games apparently give you free online multiplayer (I'm sure some PSP ones do as well but I know next to nothing about them) so that's what you should be contrasting to the for-pay Xbox Live Gold.
  15. Need more in 1 product by TheDoctorWho · · Score: 0

    Neeps to play MP3s and games. DS doesn't do that. PSP is too expensive.

    1. Re:Need more in 1 product by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are third party add-ons to give the DS that functionality...

    2. Re:Need more in 1 product by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      there are third party add-ons to almost every available console that provide this form of functionality. i think what he meant was native functionality. straight out of the box you can play your music or watch movies, etc... no need to buy any additional pieces of hardware; unofficially supported hardware that is foriegn to most mainstream america anyways.

  16. Repition of history... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The funny thing is, instead of employees all having iPods this time around they may find most employees stick with the DS over a portable Microsoft gaming console.

    Foiled again!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  17. It's not enough that they burn down a customer's h by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's not enough that they burned down a customer's house... now they are going to set a customer on fire directly! I guess this is just part of their secret strategy to scare people away from game consoles and back into PC gaming...

  18. Slashdot investigate Microsoft game strategy by aliquis · · Score: 1

    1) Make game console
    2) ???
    3) - profit!

    1. Re:Slashdot investigate Microsoft game strategy by databyss · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think in this case its:

      1) Profit!
      2) ????
      3) Make Game Console!

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    2. Re:Slashdot investigate Microsoft game strategy by aliquis · · Score: 1

      lol :D:D:D:D

      Your was way more innovative. I have mod points but I can't use them since I've posted a comment myself =P

  19. Do Less by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think that microsoft should try to narrow what it does instead of trying to do everything that it can. By narrowing it's views, the products it produces will be better.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Do Less by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      They can't help themselves. They want to rule the world.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:Do Less by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Rome had the same problem. Guess which two groups are going to share the same fate?

    3. Re:Do Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 1000 years of dominance?

      Clearly though, it is a good idea for Microsoft to change their practice, I mean it isn't like they are successful in making money or anything.

    4. Re:Do Less by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Xbox is produced at a loss. All the research I've read states that the sales on games are not successfully closing the gap made by offering the console for less than it costs to produce.

      Sure, MS can afford to do this, but it's not helping or anything.

    5. Re:Do Less by FeloniousPunk · · Score: 1

      I think that microsoft should try to narrow what it does instead of trying to do everything that it can. By narrowing it's views, the products it produces will be better.

      No, by all means let them try to do more - eventually (hopefully) MS will overextend itself and then the whole rotten house of cards will collapse.

      --
      I know this because Tyler knows this.
    6. Re:Do Less by node+3 · · Score: 1

      By narrowing it's views, the products it produces will be better.

      Microsoft has never been concerned with making its products better. It has only ever been concerned with making money. That is Bill Gates' ethic. He wants to win, and the way he measures winning is money.

      Market share is critical to winning, so MS seeks that at all costs, including flagrantly violating federal laws. Quality of their products is only a concern when it's necessary to increase profits.

      Microsoft is diametrically at odds with the consumer. The consumer's interest exactly the reverse of Microsoft's. The consumer wants quality products, and will pay if it's necessary to attain that quality. Microsoft has rigged the system and destroyed that dynamic.

  20. this pig could fly.... by Churla · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Leveraging Xbox live as a networking system to game against others, put in all the PsP goodies like local wireless access.
    Slap a derivative of Windows Mobile on it for the OS so you also have a PDA capable device. And make it look and feel like other OS products people know (windows and media center)
    Give it a touchscreen to nudge in on the PDA market futher.
    Enough storage capacity out of the box to be a small MP3 jukebox of viable portable drive.

    Not to mention the ways to integrate it and tie it in as the device which moves between your media center, xbox, and windows machine.... Lots of possibilities to leverage work they've done in other areas.

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
    1. Re:this pig could fly.... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      So basically they should release a PDA running windows PocketPC .. but actually make games for it .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:this pig could fly.... by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Kind of like what Tapwave tried to do with their Zodiac product. (Note, Tapwave's site isn't coming up for some reason, so here's a review of the Zodiac.)

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    3. Re:this pig could fly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to make simple games for portable devices, but the development costs for PSP and DS is too high. If they release a generic handheld, they will win a lot of developers.

      OSS games perhaps?

  21. ObQuestion by blackjackshellac · · Score: 0, Troll

    But will it support ogg vorbis?

    Someone had to ask.

    --
    Salut,

    Jacques

  22. One thing at a time please! by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Microsoft already has too much on it's plate (in order of ideal importance):

    1) Windows XP SP3
    2) Windows Vista
    3) Getting a decent Xbox 360 library developed
    4) Body Vests for staff that are specced to survive a Ballmer rant
    5) Windows Blackcomb this decade.

    If MS enters a new market, it's going to fall apart. MS is having to go all out to get Vista off this late, they'll have to push harder to get Blackcomb out this decade. And neither the Xbox 360 or Vista seem to be offering all that much as an incentive to upgrade. MS has too much other stuff they need to fix first.

    1. Re:One thing at a time please! by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 1

      "3) Getting a decent Xbox 360 library developed"

      What are they going to do, finish games for 3rd party developers for them?

      The 360 already has a solid release lineup (PGR3, COD2, PDZ, Kameo all receiving 85+% composite scores at rating sites - almost unheard of for launch titles) with some major titles about to hit the market (Saint's Row, Elder Scrolls, Fight Night R3).

    2. Re:One thing at a time please! by idonthack · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia, Blackcomb is scheduled for a 2011 release, although that will definitely be pushed back.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    3. Re:One thing at a time please! by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      What are they going to do, finish games for 3rd party developers for them?

      Starting on another console and doubling how much work they have to do to secure games developer committments is going to hurt them heavily. I know they don't make the games, but they have to go out there and sell the 360 vs. the PS3. And if the 360 is tied to HD-DVD, which will fail, that could be hard.

    4. Re:One thing at a time please! by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Blackcomb is the real next-gen OS. It's supposed to be largely rebuilt. If it was coming out now, it'd be very seriously dominant. But by 2011, it'll be where Vista is now: trying to sprint to get within sight of it's competitors.

    5. Re:One thing at a time please! by thaerin · · Score: 1

      1) Windows XP SP3
      2) Windows Vista


      I'm sure we all wish Microsoft had their priorities in that order but recent news http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/19/204 5204 seems to indicate otherwise. Alas, they care more about their next money making scam, err "product cycle" (i.e. Vista) than fixing their current offerings. I can understand their wanting to move into this market, after all, they feel as if they need to be everything to everybody.

      --
      If big boobed women work at Hooters do one legged women work at IHOP?
    6. Re:One thing at a time please! by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "Blackcomb is the real next-gen OS. It's supposed to be largely rebuilt."

      Which is what they said about Cairo (which turned into Windows/NT 4), and Windows-2000, and Windows-XP, and Longhorn (Windows Vista). Each was supposed to be a true next generation OS which would be completely re-built, and have all sorts of amazing features, because amazing features and complete re-builds of very complex pieces of software are extremely easy to write about, but rather less easy to do.

      So the amazing features get lopped off, and the complete re-build becomes "we rewrote these two bits, but it's basically what you already have with some extra stuff nailed on". And the project completion dates slip and slip because they yet again wasted years trying to do a rewrite, found it didn't work with all the legacy stuff, and had to go back to the old code base and try to tack on at least some of the promised amazing features, albeit in a less amazing way.

      The really surprising thing is that despite years and years of making _exactly_ the same claims about every forthcoming OS offering, and then failing to fulfil them in exactly the same way they did the last time, people still believe it.

      Prediction: Blackcomb will not be a complete rewrite, and in addition to lacking many of the features promised for it, will also still lack several that were promised for Cairo, which was supposed to be launched in 1994.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  23. Merging technology by RingDev · · Score: 1

    If they could merge a PDA, with an improved media player, and a game system, I would be quite happy. Then again, my pocket PC already plays all of my music, has games available, and runs third party programs. So what's so special about those other hand helds?

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Merging technology by neveragain4181 · · Score: 1

      Dude - a pocket PC doesn't have an X in the name, no analogue sticks of joy or 'go l33tr' stripes.

      Plus, it we wait till, er, about, er ................ now, then your expensive pocket pc hardware is now officially yesterday's gaming technology due to lack of 'meeja chips'. If I only have that few pixels to stare at, I really want them blitt'd the hell all over the place...

      N/A

    2. Re:Merging technology by jseale · · Score: 1
      If Sony was trying to do this with the PSP, they're doing it at a snail's pace. There's a bevy of features missing from the PSP that Microsoft's new device will probably be getting:

      * FM Radio/Satellite Radio

      * Camera

      * PDF reader

      * audio recorder

      Not that I hate my PSP cause it misses this stuff but it seems like Sony really hurried the PSP to market by leaving this stuff out. Having a media player and web browser in this thing is enough for now, I guess.

  24. Close to reality methinks by leather_helmet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rumors and speculation about a MS handheld were floating around at last years E3. I believe they may go for a 'media' device that will offer a sizeable internal HD and the ability to play games, music, video, productivity tools (email, 'office' type services etc.), internet browsing...

    An 'all in one' device

  25. Possible designs by Eightyford · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here are a few possible designs:

    xbox
    xbox
    joke
    xbox

    And, a portable gamecube:
    gamecube

    1. Re:Possible designs by kevin.fowler · · Score: 1

      That Gamecube would be slick. But with I bet it'd chaw batteries with a vengeance.

      --
      Bury me in mashed potatoes.
    2. Re:Possible designs by mill5ja · · Score: 1

      wow. the gamecube one makes me feel funny in my pants.

  26. It will not be a gaming platform by thammoud · · Score: 1

    I believe that Microsoft will launch a mobile device that will serve as a mobile phone and a media device. They have the mobile OS, the media software. All they will need is a killer design and an Itunes like website.

  27. Reference design. Maybe. Product? Doubtful. by winkydink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't see them pissing off a whole bunch of media player mfgs who already have product on the market by going head to head with them. I can see them doing a reference design like they did with a cell phone.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  28. I come... FROM THE FUTURE! by RyoShin · · Score: 4, Funny

    November 2nd, 2006
    Microsoft Unveils New Portable Gaming Station
    via Reuters

    In the wake of the success of both Sony's PS3 and Nintendo's Revolution and dwindling XBox 360 numbers, Microsoft has stepped up to the plate to challenge both companies in another gaming market: handhelds.

    In an MTV2 event held yesterday, Micrsoft revealed their "XBox Z", the tentatively named portable gaming station. "We aim to do it all," a spokesman commented. "The XBox Z, known internally as the ZBox, will be a one-size-fits all handheld device, capable of playing anything, from video to music to games."

    The unit, which is a bit smaller than a regular computer keyboard, weighs in at about two pounds. Controls are made up of four analog control sticks and six buttons, as well as three buttons on each shoulder. When asked about how gamers are supposed to use four analog sticks with only two thumbs, the spokesman replied "They'll think of something."

    A 5" LCD screen sits in the middle and slightly up, amidst the controls. The unit takes regular sized CDs and will also support the new HD-DVD format, playing anything from XBox games to CDs to DVDs. Mentioned briefly was an attachment to play turntable-style records, to pull in the music enthusiast crowd.

    Initial accessories were also announced at the unveiling. A small packpack, used to hold the system and its three required power sources, will be offered in various colors, as well as a clear mesh form. A utility-like belt will be used to hold various media to play in the device.

    When asked about battery life and size, the Microsoft spokesman replied "I'll admit, right now it's a bit of a drainer, with a large size. We're working on the battery life, and expect to have it last two hours on 16 AA batteries. As for the large size, we're looking into shrinking it, but complete hard drives are hard to replace. Besides, gamers will be able to show their handheld with pride, belittling the other so called 'gaming handhelds'."

    No release date was announced, though Microsoft plans to use "Bringing gaming to a new dimension" as their slogan.

    More information is expected by the end of the month, as long as the Korean-Canadian war does not interfere with ongoing plans.

  29. oh boy .. hang on tight GP2X .. by torpor · · Score: 1

    .. its gonna be a rough ride.

    seriously though, i'll never write software for Microsoft, ever. i have all the hardware i need, and it all runs linux.

    no thanks, Microsoft!

    (GP2X rocks, yo!)

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  30. Playing original Xbox Games? by tbcpp · · Score: 1

    If they made it so that you could somehow rip your Xbox games onto it, that would be a killer device. Halo on a handheld with wifi. Killer app right there.

    --
    Man is the lowest-cost, 150-pound, nonlinear, all-purpose computer system which can be mass-produced by unskilled labor.
  31. Sounds like an op for different "bundles" by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    An easy solution to get it viewed as a game player and a iPod killer would be to have different bundles (which sounds like XBox 360). Different bundles would be sold in different parts of the store, one looking like an mp3/video player, other looking like a video game player. Let's hope they don't slaughter the idea though like they did with XBox 360 (which I think is taking advantage of the fact that $400 is too much, and selling a $300 version with much more then $100 worth of retail stuff stripped out). I can see them selling an mp3 player version for $300 that needs a $200 upgrade to play games, a game version for $300 that requires a $200 hardrive addon to store any siginificant amount of music, and a "mega version" that costs like $400 with the abilities of both. Also kind of like Creative's sound card variants for gamers and mp3 players.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  32. Risky at best by BillLeeLee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This same question came up in a forum I frequent, and just like I said there, I'd wonder if Microsoft really wants to fight a two front war in the console and handheld markets. I think they should focus on achieving profits with the XBox 360 before they create another potential money sink.

    Of course, they could just say "Look how much of a success Sony has had in just over a year of entering the market!" Well, depending on whose numbers you trust, Sony's PSP could be a good example of a true challenger to the king of the handheld world. By some accounts Sony owns roughly 25% of the market. I think that 25% is only compared to the market it shares with the Nintendo DS, because I don't think the PSP owns 25% of the global handheld market when you consider all the people who still have the older Gameboy Advances, SPs, etc., which numbers in the tens of millions.

    Also, there is still the Japanese market. As the last two Microsoft console launches there have shown, reception by the Japanese was lackluster at best. I think for a true challenger to Sony and Nintendo, a Microsoft handheld would really have to succeed in Japan. Sure, many people will say "But Europe and the Americas are Microsoft's main market," but I think this is a limited view. Microsoft does see Japan as a market it must penetrate successfully, which is why they began courting more Japanese companies to create games that cater more to the Japanese people.

    Also, Japan is a significant market for games. Over there, the Nintendo DS sold 4 million units in 2005, twice that of the PSP for the same year. If you look at the sales charts for the past several months, every week was basically 6 - 7 DS games in the top 10 sales chart. On the other hand, it was incredibly rare to see a PSP game crack the top 10 of the chart.

    And that is also something that Microsoft should learn from. The PSP sells well in the States and Europe probably because it is seen as cooler, more stylish, and it has more capabilities than the admittedly plain-jane DS. However, in my very humble opinion, its game selection is more limited than the DS's. Microsoft could really make an impact if they deliver with a steady stream of good, quality games and not rely on whatever other features their handheld would have (i.e. Sony's UMDs being more popular than the actual games).

    Microsoft should also learn that having the most powerful parts does not make a system inherently better than another. At its core, the PSP is more powerful than the DS (dual MIPS 300 MHz processors (locked at 200 Mhz max), more powerful graphics engine), but the DS, at least in Japan, has sold more. Why? Even with a relatively weaker system, the games being developed for it are fun and appealing to more than just the 18-35 demographic. That's why games like the Brain Training games have been so successful and continue to stay on the charts.

    Microsoft can make this work, but they might have to shift some of their views.

    --
    www.google.com
    1. Re:Risky at best by j.bellone · · Score: 1

      Microsoft should also learn that having the most powerful parts does not make a system inherently better than another. At its core, the PSP is more powerful than the DS (dual MIPS 300 MHz processors (locked at 200 Mhz max), more powerful graphics engine), but the DS, at least in Japan, has sold more. Why? Even with a relatively weaker system, the games being developed for it are fun and appealing to more than just the 18-35 demographic. That's why games like the Brain Training games have been so successful and continue to stay on the charts.

      But this is not totally Sony's fault. You also need to take in the factor that Nintendo's system supports a wide library of their previous games, so people are able to easily upgrade to the DS without worrying about losing all of their favorite titles from the GBA. Even though there are more developers currently on this system, that is the major reason why this system is selling more. Its the same boat in why the Playstation 2 outsold the Xbox and Gamecube combined worldwide. They had the games from Playstation, and the developers to back them. The PSP is a great system, and I believe the developers will start to flock there. But until original content starts to spring up (e.g. not the stuff from the PS2 because the systems are vastly similar) the DS is still going to sell.

      --
      I'm f#$king magic!
    2. Re:Risky at best by masamax · · Score: 1
      DS is obviously more popular as a game player, but the PSP has advantages that the DS can't match, and more versatility than you can shake a stick at.

      Besides, can you think of a time when Nintendo WASN'T on top of the portable market? They have destroyed all their competition before it ever got off the ground. PSP is well off the ground now, and here to stay, and the fact that they can do that in a market as dominated as the handheld market was is a feat unto itself. The PSP has put Sony's foot in the door, so how can anyone claim Sony has failed when they have achieved more than any other company in the last 20 years?

      --
      I like to kill your couch. HE DIED HARD! MOO.
    3. Re:Risky at best by nolife · · Score: 1


      My comment is specific to your part about the PSP and from the main story where it was stated:

      If the new device comes with the Xbox brand, most consumers will view it as a game player, like Sony's PlayStation Portable.

      I think the PSP would sell much more if it did not require hacks and specific versions of old firmware to do basic things. Meaning, Sony should allow or encourage more non gaming uses. I'd love to have Google Earth or a decent chat application ported to the PSP. Make it more like a PDA but with the gaming capability that it already has. IMHO, the PSP would take off and more functionality would be available to everyone that owned one. I guess the down side for Sony would be loss of game sales. I know Nokia makes a portable computer (referenced on /. a few weeks ago, sorry, no link) but gaming is not its high point.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    4. Re:Risky at best by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      in one year the psp shipped/sold almost over half of what the sega gamegear sold during its entire lifespan. the gamegear which was the only handheld ever anywhere near close to challenging the gameboy.

      of course its not winning the war. oh well... its a testament that they are still gaining ground. they have a temporary lack of original games. no backcatalog of games numbering in the thousands. a pricepoint $100 higher. but they are still gaining ground?!?!?! two handhelds in the market have definitely had its advantages, competition is good!

  33. If they were smart by shoptroll · · Score: 1

    If they were smart, they would hold off a lot longer to learn more about the market. Sony supposedly did their homework before launching the PSP and look where that's gotten them. Sony at least had the benefit of being the #1 console system at the time of the PSP launch so it was the logical next step.

    They should spend more time trying to sell XBox360's and the up-and coming XBox720 before they consider starting work on the XBrick.

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  34. Re:Reference design. Maybe. Product? Doubtful. by zulux · · Score: 1

    I can't see them pissing off a whole bunch of media player mfgs who already have product on the market by going head to head with them.

    Microsoft will betray anybody.

    Remember Sega?

    Sega "teamed" with Microsoft to bring a Windows CE based console to market to replace Sega's inhouse development platform.

    Now we have the Xbox and no Sega.

    Remember SGI?

    SGI "teamed" with Microsoft to bring a new display technology (Ferenheit) to replace SGI's OpenGL.

    Now we have DirectX and no SGI.

    Remember Digital?

    Digital "temed" with Microsoft to bring NT to the Alpha - Microsoft pilfered Digitals employees and improved NT by copying Digital's operating system.

    Now we have XP and no Digital.

    Microsoft will use a "partner" to gain insight into a market, and then turn and crush them.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  35. About time by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, both Nintendo and Sony have a handheld game platform, why not Microsoft?

    Microsoft both has a Mobile version of Windows AND partnerships with mobile platform makers. To make a mobile Xbox platform simply means taking some existing PocketPC device and making it more gaming centric. They even ported DirectX to the mobile platform so there is at least a 3d graphics library to leverage.

    Whether or not it will compete well against the dominant Nintendo remains to be seen. The PSP has been struggling to gain acceptance, but then again, Sony struggled to gain dominance over Nintendo's game consoles and succeeded. Microsoft may have learned how Sony failed with the PSP and NOT make those same mistakes.

    Both Sony and MS has to realize though that the kinds of games that makes their console platforms popular (sports and multiplayer 3rd person shooters) don't make a handheld system popular. People that like Nintendo Gameboys like puzzle games, RPGs and platformers, as well as novelty games that feature touch screen or card readers, not sports or 3rd person shooters. To compete well against Nintendo means to recognize the types of games that make the Gameboys popular and catering to that audience, rather then simply porting successful game console titles to handheld versions.

    It would be interesting to see what MS could come up with. Hopefully they might recognize the idea that by bringing gaming into their existing Pocket PC market, while maintaining PDA like functionality, they could both revamp the PDA industry (make boring PDA's entertaining) and offer something more then a simple time waster (bring functionality to handheld game platforms).

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:About time by j.bellone · · Score: 1

      Both Sony and MS has to realize though that the kinds of games that makes their console platforms popular (sports and multiplayer 3rd person shooters) don't make a handheld system popular. People that like Nintendo Gameboys like puzzle games, RPGs and platformers, as well as novelty games that feature touch screen or card readers, not sports or 3rd person shooters.

      This is true, but Sony is not the only company making games for the PSP (even though it may seem like it). There have been a lot of companies simply porting games over from the PS2 because the hardware is similar, and that is precisely why you are seeing the vast majority of the above games. Its not because Sony is pushing for these games (even though SOCOM is on there) its because the developers haven't hit the system yet.

      I don't understand why everyone is bashing the PSP; Nintendo has the leverage in this market, and they also have the installed userbase. If their system can play the old GB/GBA games than they already have hundreds of games ready to be played, and the people can safely upgrade their systems without worry. Sony doesn't have this, and they are fighting to get developers to move to their platform to create original content for the system. There is a reason that the DS is selling more, and its not because the games are better; Its because it has a bigger library of games, and more developers. This is the same reason why the Playstation 2 has sold the vast number of units worldwide, because it played a good portion of the original Playstation games.

      I don't think Microsoft would target their "handheld" at gaming, at least, not at first. It would not make sense. What would make sense, though, is to go after the iPod market with a Windows Mobile device. It would not take much to redesign a PDA into a better media device, allow it to syncronize with the X360, Vista, and XPMCE. They are already launching the media service with MTV, which was a good play on their part.

      The iPod is a brand not a good piece of hardware. My 4G iPod (less than 9 months old) is sitting here frozen right now and has been doing this for the past three months. The only thing Apple has going for them is the brand, and the fake veil of the iPod being the best player out there (which is not true, its merely a mediocre player). But that's brand loyalty for you.

      Even though Microsoft has done some dumb things in the past, I believe we need someone to challenge Apple and force them to get their hardware up to par with everyone else. Creative may have some crappy UI and Software (where Apple really excels, and I am not disputing that) but their players are technically better in most ways than the iPod.

      --
      I'm f#$king magic!
    2. Re:About time by Dream1979 · · Score: 0

      Both Sony and MS has to realize though that the kinds of games that makes their console platforms popular (sports and multiplayer 3rd person shooters) don't make a handheld system popular. People that like Nintendo Gameboys like puzzle games, RPGs and platformers, as well as novelty games that feature touch screen or card readers, not sports or 3rd person shooters. To compete well against Nintendo means to recognize the types of games that make the Gameboys popular and catering to that audience, rather then simply porting successful game console titles to handheld versions.

      I disagree, the reason i got a PSP is because it is NOTHING like anything nintendo ever released. I dont want to play pokemon, I want to play GTA, Madden, and multi-player shooters. Yes I also like RPGs but nintendo doesn't really have any good RPGs anymore since Square signed with Sony, and Xbox has a huge RPG selecion which they can port over to a handheld. Just Imagine the possibilities...

  36. In America... by mpapet · · Score: 1

    Portable devices that do many things don't ever do very well in the marketplace. Look at the PDA or the market for the "universal remote control."

    The jury is still out on whether or not a video iPod will be successful. That's about as close to multifunction as people will put up with. Please don't provide Apple's video downloads as proof of "success". Most people will try something a few times and it's tough to argue we've passed through the try-out stage yet.

    I would love to hear from people in other parts of the world if all-in-one devices are more desirable than single purpose devices.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  37. Pass by HunterZ · · Score: 1

    I'd be highly skeptical of any Microsoft handheld... It's just going to be too DRM-laden to be interesting.

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    1. Re:Pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same can be said about Sony products. When you say DRM it's Sony that comes to my mind first.

  38. Portable with a hard drive? by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that if they could fit an iPod-sized hard drive into a portable game system, they could actually make some good innovations in gameplay as well. And if was interoperable with Xbox Live, so you could download games straight to the HD through an Xbox 360 or PC connector, it would be even cooler. Imagine a huge library of small, indy games available on the cheap for download to a portable system... not too shabby! And if you could download even your purchased games to the HD, it would save you from lugging around a bunch of little game carts with the system!

  39. Imagine the horror... by CaptSnuffy · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...of Xbox Live players being released into the wild.

    Oh, the humanity!

  40. A funny comment considering the success of the DS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IIRC Nintendo has sold a total of ~13Million DSes worldwide over the life of the product.

    Apple sold over 14 Million iPods last quarter alone.

    Do the math.

  41. Linux Alternative by Drasil · · Score: 1

    I'd prefer one of these.

  42. They're going to make one of their own?!? by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

    Rather than leave it to third party hardware companies to do it for them?

    If this comes to fruition, how much are they willing to lose per unit, like the XBox and the XBox 360?

  43. What to name it... by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1
    The problem: This theoretical handheld needs to appeal to both the gamer market and those looking for a portable media player, a crossover that none have yet to master. So far, every attempt has been seen as belonging decidedly to one market or the other (such as the PSP), or has simply failed altogether. Should also capitalize on Microsoft's X-Box name for brand awareness, but shouldn't be tied to it to prevent pigeonholing.

    The solution: Hello, x-Pod!

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:What to name it... by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      i think the psp has done a good job. almost anyone who knows about the psp considers it a gaming machine. however the general public has been picking up UMD titles left and right, so the mainstream has at least accepted the fact that it is also a movie player to some extent.

  44. Worst Idea Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has already entered a market where they were outmatched by their competition in both quality of product and brand recognition (the PS2 may have been technically inferior but contained a far larger and more diverse library), entering into the handheld market (while still not being successful in the home market) would be a blunder on another level.

    The main problems are that it would divert resources away from their main platform (the XBox 360 currently) and could damage the brand name if (more likely when) Nintendo runs them out of the market; suppose they name it something like the XBox GO if (when) it fails people will be saying how the XBox GO sucked, and that the XBox GO was too expensive (and this will hurt the XBox Brand). This is why Nintendo names every system differently, in particular why the Nintendo DS was the Nintendo DS rather than the Gameboy DS.

  45. Microsoft already in the handheld market by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    for example: Dell Axim X51v

  46. How will I carry my Laptop Around... by ebcdic1 · · Score: 0

    With this thing strapped to my back

  47. MS just wants to kill off competitors... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

    namely Sony, they figure, hey the first time they entered the console market with the original Xbox, it ended up killing Sega and their Dreamcast - so they figure, hey the hell why not again, this time maybe we'll get lucky and kill off Sony...

    The thing is, Sega was/is hardware and games only, when Sony on the other hand, is damn near as big if not (dare I say it) bigger than the unholy Microsoft Empire. So what, MS has Windows, Xbox, and MS Office - Sony makes super high end TV's, computer hardware (such as the Vaio line, the world could be running on Linux - if a few of the distros would make it nice and shiny and more user friendly than even Windows or OS X), the Playstation line of consoles, and the fact that where as Warner Bros, Paramount, Universal, and Tristar used to be in the intro to damn near every movie made that Americans watched, now half the movies I see commercials/pre-views for are by Sony.

    Point being: Sony aint goin away anytime soon, if MS killed any of the companies by releasing a handheld of their own, it would be Nintendo, which most closely resembles Sega before they took a dive...

    1. Re:MS just wants to kill off competitors... by Dream1979 · · Score: 1

      If anyone is going to get killed off its nintendo. They just aren't making good games anymore. Sony and Microsoft are releasing 3 times more games. That alone stands to reason with that many more games there are bound to be more good games, that appeal to more people. Nintendo with their quality over quantity policy alienates them from a big part of the market. Not everyone wants to play pokemon, super smash melee, and mario party. Some of us like mature themes, and nintendo just doesn't deliver.

    2. Re:MS just wants to kill off competitors... by Ekarderif · · Score: 1

      So... BMX XXX isn't mature enough for you?

      A good game you say? How about Resident Evil 4?

    3. Re:MS just wants to kill off competitors... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      yes, but where did games like the Resident Evil 4 you mentioned start out at - Sony Playstation...

      Point made, next question please...

    4. Re:MS just wants to kill off competitors... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1
      as I said in my third paragraph/break -

      Point being: Sony aint goin away anytime soon, if MS killed any of the companies by releasing a handheld of their own, it would be Nintendo, which most closely resembles Sega before they took a dive...


      thanks for the reinforcing argument - it helps prove points when more than one person thinks a certain way about something...
    5. Re:MS just wants to kill off competitors... by Dream1979 · · Score: 0

      By Mature, I didn't mean pointless nudity. BMX XXX was Tony Hawk on a bike with topless chicks. It was also released for all 3 systems, I have all 3 and when I have the choice, I ALWAYS pick Xbox (not that i would ever buy BMX XXX). RE4 is a great game, but its even better for PS2 where the series originated.

    6. Re:MS just wants to kill off competitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Resident Evil 4 was on the Gamecube for over a year before it was released for the PS2.

    7. Re:MS just wants to kill off competitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Xbox wasn't released until after the discontinuation of the Dreamcast. If Sega was killed off by anyone, it was Sony. Nintendo also has a huge loyal fanbase that mostly reside outside of the US market... their chances of going under are pretty damn slim.

  48. Jobs and the MS iPod response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting, a few days ago Steve Jobs said that MS will have to make his own iPod version.

  49. Re:Reference design. Maybe. Product? Doubtful. by winkydink · · Score: 1

    I think you need to better understand the differences between causality and correlation. It's a lot easier to blame Microsoft for one's failures than it is to blame one's self.

    Lat time I looked, both Sega and SGI were still open for business.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  50. Market Saturation by cualexander · · Score: 1
    I think the portable device market is becoming far too saturated at the moment. Look at all the portable devices.

    1.)Multimedia Cellphones that play video, music and games.

    2.)Ipod and other mp3 players play video and music.

    3.)Handheld Videogame systems-Gameboy, DS, PSP. PSP plays videos and music.

    4.)PDAs-plays videos, music and games.

    The race has already been won as far as music goes for the iPod. Why should I buy any new product when the iPod is already out, and proven its popularity and has thousands of cool accessories(not that I really care, but think about the mainstream populace, especially females). Especially the iTunes store. As more and more people buy songs from iTunes, it basically eliminates possibility of competing products. I've probably spent at least $200 in iTunes, do you think I'm going to throw all that away to jump ships to the Microsoft camp? No way.

    Aside from the gee-whiz thats cool feature factor that may appeal to some tech nuts out there, I can hardly forsee any new feature that Microsoft could come up with to improve upon the existing devices.

    The way I see it, the portable device market is already way too saturated with cool gadgets that are expensive and ultimately don't do much. I think the trend these days is going toward simplicity in tech rather than all these crazy features. People get tired of learning how to use all these crazy things and spending lots of money on them.

    So tell me what device they could possibly come up with that would trump the iPod or the current lineup of PocketPCs?

  51. I have the name of the device... by 2names · · Score: 1

    Microsoft XPort

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:I have the name of the device... by Billygoatz · · Score: 0

      XPort is already being used by a programmer that ports emulators to the xbox. http://xport.xbox-scene.com/

    2. Re:I have the name of the device... by 2names · · Score: 1

      And someone already using a name stops Microsoft from using it how?

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  52. Oh Yeah by Dream1979 · · Score: 1

    Finally some real competition for the PSP. I only hope they have a better battery life. I am confident it will be as good if not better than the PSP as the Xbox was the most powerful of its generation.

    I'd say Microsoft's biggest worry should be the Xbox 360 as it is the first of the Next gen consoles. PS3 just might steal the show. As for the revolution.... well that just seems like a big joke to me and i refuse to waste my money on it.

  53. Competition by NVP_Radical_Dreamer · · Score: 1

    I'm all for competition, but this is ridiculous. Did they not learn from Sony's mistake that there is no beating nintendo when it comes to portable gaming. I realise that it is also going to be an "ipod killer" or so they wish but that makes things even worse since devices that are marketed as a swiss army knife fail because people see them as a jack of all trades but master of none.

    Not to mention their track record of faulty devices...... Dying Xblock hdd, xblock that ate discs, overheating power supplies etc etc

    --
    The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

    - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Competition by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      I guess they didn't (Xbox) learn from Nintendo's experience in the console market, either, huh?

      MS is going after Sony, 'cause Sony thrashed Nintendo in consoles.

      What's different in MS going after Nintendo, 'cause Nintendo thrashed Sony in handhelds? (Not that I actually believe they thrashed them)

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    2. Re:Competition by NVP_Radical_Dreamer · · Score: 1

      They may have been outsold, but Nintendo made money. Thats more than I can say for the "other two"

      --
      The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

      - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Competition by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, in today's climate of near monopoly, "made money" may not be enough. If they can continuously outsell, such that in the long run they disrupt Nintendo's economies of scale, they'll win by default.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  54. Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The plan would include a way to leverage a powerful part of the Microsoft empire: games

    But it isn't a powerful part of the MS empire, in fact MS itself makes few games (Solitaire, Minesweeper, Flight Simulator, Pinball, not much else).

    they're not just going after the iPod

    How will they even be able to touch the iPod? The device will just end up like the PSP... Not too great in any category, and too fragile to really be portable.

    This just seems like a weird plan all in all.

    1. Re:Weird by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      I guess you aren't familar with Microsoft Game Studios huh?

      Titles for Windows:
      http://www.microsoft.com/games/pc/default.aspx

      Titles for Xbox:
      http://www.microsoft.com/games/xbox/default.aspx

      Given that those are some of the most popular games currently on the market, I think your rather mistaken in this. I say this as someone who usually spends an undue amount of time insulting MS.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  55. And they should call it MGage :-) by mingrassia · · Score: 1

    ... but seriously, didn't one very large successful company just announce defeat in the handheld game market? For those who missed it, I'm not surprised ... it was a Quite Death :-)

    What makes MS think that they can succeed?

    Perhaps the hardware will be a variant of the Dell Axim X51v?

    --
    OS X, Linux, Tivo, Amiga, my fascination with cult-like technologies would intrigue any psychiatrist.
  56. Microsoft PlayTable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect they have it wrong. Microsoft is working on a product codenamed PlayTable. It looks like those old barroom videogames where you look down into a glass table video game. The difference is all of the spinning mirrors. Can you say 3D? TI did this years ago for prototype Air Traffic Control. Interesting to see it recycled. Yes it is real. I've seen the prototypes.

  57. Re:Reference design. Maybe. Product? Doubtful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't agree with most examples you gave, but I think I should add IBM and the OS/2 && Win95 case to this list.

    Alexandre Moreira. (Too lazy to register)

  58. The world is coming to an end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple is moving towards selling their software on commodity hardware, and MS is becoming a hardware vendor.

  59. Introducing...the X-Pod by Prototerm · · Score: 1

    Just like Apple's little video player, except Microsoft's has a Blue Screen

    --
    "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." --Senator Carl Schurz (1872)
  60. MS Introduces... by dzfoo · · Score: 1

    The xPod.

    And if their introduction to the console market is any indication, it'll be the size of a bible on paper-back, as heavy as an 32" woofer driver magnet, and occasionally burst into flames.

    It'll be "portable" in the academic sense (i.e. it'll have a strap).

        -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
    1. Re:MS Introduces... by kilo242 · · Score: 1

      It'll be portable using the Army's definition of portable - it'll fit into the back of a truck, and will be able to be carried by two fit soldiers.

    2. Re:MS Introduces... by enzo_romeo · · Score: 1

      I think it might look something like this: Microsoft xPod

  61. my PDA has a first name... by RingDev · · Score: 1

    My PDA has an 'X'! It's a Dell Axim :) It's only 400mhz, but it does have 32k color, 7 buttons, a flipper and a direction pad. :)

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  62. Re:It's not enough that they burn down a customer' by dykmoby · · Score: 2, Funny

    Remember, build a man a fire and he is warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he is warm for the rest of his life!

    --
    Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt = [citation required]
  63. A different Approach by mtgarden · · Score: 1

    How about a music player comparable to a 5G iPod? Then have it drop into a cradle that ads the functionality of a gaming system. Then they could sell the system as a mp3 player with video/pic functionality with an option to upgrade to a full gaming system complete with wifi.... Just a thought.

  64. I'm appalled at you people. by macserv · · Score: 1

    An article comes out about Microsoft making a new handheld device, and all you can say is "xPod" and "MGage". Isn't it possible that Microsoft will innovate, making a completely new and revolutionary.. *snicker*... device that redefines... *snrk*... the industry and... and... Bwaaahahahahahahaha! Aha- aha- aha- aahahaha.

    Oh, oh man, there was NO way I could make it through that. *wipes tears away*

  65. I think it will work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sony PSP pushed the nintendo DS to number two. Maybe Sony will totally outpace ninshito in the handheld market. I have a feeling this will push ninshito to number 3 in the portable market as well. If they are number 3 in both the home and portable game markets they will eventually suffer a total financial collapse, and totally get out of the hardware market. Correct me if I'm wrong, didn't Ninshito state once that if they had to pull out of the hardware market, they would also pull out of the software market?

  66. Xboy DS by tepples · · Score: 1

    Considering the Bill Gates dream, wouldn't that be a TabletPC?

    So what would the dual-head version be called? The Xboy DS?

  67. If Microsoft wants to succeed... by JFMulder · · Score: 1

    ... in the handheld market, I think they should do what they do best : buy the competition. ;)

  68. XBox + Active Sync == Transporter Accident by scotty1024 · · Score: 1

    The major problem I see with a XBox portable is that MIcrosoft would insist on syncing it with Windows via Active Sync.

    With the added sync responsibilities for saved game data I can just imagine the kinds of new trouble active sync could get into.

    You go to restart Halo 4: The Mobile Campaigns and you get "Halo 4 is damaged, would you like to play a nice game of Chess instead?"
    Or perhaps "I am sorry but you have been deauthorized to play that title."

    I still believe that manufacturers ship Active Sync with their Windows Mobile products to increase profits from non-warranty covered repairs... If Microsoft gets into a mobile device they could reap the rewards directly.

  69. Artist's Impression by EnglishTim · · Score: 1