Slashdot Mirror


Fight Tooth Decay with Electricity

Erica Campbell writes "According to IsraCast, The Israeli Company Fluorinex Active has developed a new technology that can protect the tooth from cavities for 5 years with one simple electrical treatment. The company is currently working on a small device which, together with a gel, will impose an efficient ion exchange process through an Electro-chemical reaction in which fluor ions displace the Hydroxide ions at the outer layer of the tooth. This is intended to produce a new mineral layer with significantly improved chemical and physical resistance to the aggressive bacteria and the resulting acidic environment in the mouth."

277 comments

  1. Gums. by Threni · · Score: 4, Informative

    Your teeth can be protected largely by not eating too much sugary food - your acidic saliva is quite capable of destroying a lot of bacteria. It's your gums that require care.

    1. Re:Gums. by eepok · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True... very true. But remember, we're creating such technologies so we can abuse such standards and still have a marvelous smile.

      ex. Teeth whitening for smokers/coffee drinkers, tooth implants for those who don't sufficiently take care of their teeth, etc.

    2. Re:Gums. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why isn't this modded higher? Most people don't know that your gums are far more likely to develop problems long before your teeth do if you have bad cleaning habits. Teeth are laregely self cleaning, gums have problems. Mod the parent up.

    3. Re:Gums. by onwardknave · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your saliva is basic, not acidic. The bacteria produce lactic acid and lower the pH in plaques, ultimately resulting in tooth decay. The bacteria produce the acid because they metabolize sugary foods by glycolysis. Less sugar means less acid production by the bacteria in the mouth.

    4. Re:Gums. by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1
      This would be true! If it wasn't a myth, anyway. Sugar is not any worse for your teeth than any other fermentable carbohydrate. Just one more reason those low-carb diets are good for you. Unless of course you are eating Carl's Jr.'s Low Carb 6 Dollar Burger.

      Note: I am not seriously trying to promote low-carb diets as much as trying to debunk a myth.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    5. Re:Gums. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you point us to any information about lowering "sugar" in our diets?

      I myself over the last 18 months have slowly been lowering my sugar in-take, partly because one side of the family is know to have Diabetes, another part being my teeth --mine have never been that great anyway-- plus I wanted to put on weight as I one of the many that has a very fast metabolism and before I started to change my diet to more sensible eattings. before I used to weigh just 9 stone (126lbs / 57kg) now I am 13 stone (182lbs / 82.5kg).

      Anyway, I do know that these so called low sugar or no sugar can and will do more harm to my body. It is a constant battle to know what to really eat these days, if it is not about losing weight, it is about lowering your salt intake, lowering your cholesteral, yadda yadda.

      PITA.

      and thanks, :)

    6. Re:Gums. by juan2074 · · Score: 1
      • Don't eat processed foods anymore (including un-natural fat-free or sugar-free foods).
      • Drink lots of water every day.
      • Eat as many fruits and vegetables as you can. (Natural sugars are not like refined ones.)
      • Eat whole un-refined grains and other complex carbohydrates (not simple carbs).
      • Make sure to get enough fibre in your diet.
      • Be sure to actually consume enough fat. (You need fat to take in some nutrients, like vitamins A, D, E, and K.)
      • Don't eat hydrogrenated oils and fats.
      • Get your Omega-3 essential fatty acids (from fish, if possible).
    7. Re:Gums. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really hate having to respond to this but this bullet point is a bit off-base:

      "(Natural sugars are not like refined ones.)"

      All plants produce the same sugar that is produced by sugar beets and sugar cane. Sugar beets and cane just produce more of it by weight than any other plants. The sucrose is extracted from the plants and put through a repeated process that removes the molasses from the raw sugar and then evaporates the water in the pressings until the liquid becomes super saturated. Then the sucrose crystalizes and precipitates out of the liquid onto a belt where it is packaged.

      The issue with sugar is that, yes sugar is bad because of the bacteria, but that sugar consumed with starches (say cookies and cakes) are worse, as the starch acts like a cement and causes the sugar to hang around on your teeth longer.

    8. Re:Gums. by waxwing · · Score: 1

      * Fast every other day.

    9. Re:Gums. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Give an explanation beyond "hippy fear" for not eating artificially sweetened sugar-free foods. And related it to tooth care.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    10. Re:Gums. by Hellasboy · · Score: 1

      I remember that we were talking in my microbiology course about tooth decay and that it really didn't appear in people up until the ~16th century i believe. Some people did get tooth decay, but it was generally the older people. They didn't use toothbrushes or floss.

      Do you happen to know what was the change in the 16th century.

      Processed Sugars from the "New" World. So what do we do now? Stick that stuff in as many things as we possibly can.

      --

      "Tread softly because you tread on my dreams"
    11. Re:Gums. by ObiWanKenblowme · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then again, if memory serves, the majority of "older people" in pre-16th century times were around 30 years old, so I'm not sure refined sugars from the new world can really be considered a causal factor here. Seems just as likely that most people simply died before their teeth finished rotting.

      --
      Obvious exits are NORTH, SOUTH, and DENNIS.
    12. Re:Gums. by enux · · Score: 1

      I guess you found the yin but not the yam. Why dont we come up with bacteria that motabolise acid to sugar and ballance our mouths and let these two live in harmony cant we all just get along.

    13. Re:Gums. by oasisbob · · Score: 1
      I really hate having to respond to this but this bullet point is a bit off-base:

      "(Natural sugars are not like refined ones.)"
      All plants produce the same sugar that is produced by sugar beets and sugar cane.


      Almost. Although refined sugars are derived from plant sources, the composition of sugars in plants and fruits vary widely from plant to plant. Sucrose is common table sugar. Grapes for example have more glucose than other fruits and is chemically one of the reasons they're used in making wine. (This is why grape nuts are called grape nuts... they were originally sweetened with glucose.) The amount of Fructose and Sucrose also vary.
    14. Re:Gums. by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      That's a common misconception--but the fact that life expectancy at birth was approximately 30 does not mean that there were few people over that age; rather, it reflects the high infant and childhood mortality rates. If you look at the lifespans of people who survived childhood, they're not much different from ours: Christopher Columbus lived to 55; Julius Caesar was 56 when he was murdered; Octavian was 77; Charlemagne was 67 or 69; Elizabeth I was 69; Alfred the Great was 50 and so on.

  2. Would this affect coloring? by PornMaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would this process affect the coloration of the teeth?

    It'd really suck to lock in any staining...

    1. Re:Would this affect coloring? by Brigadier · · Score: 4, Interesting



      well a floride coating is what natrually protects our teeth, thats why tap water, and toothpaste have this as an additive. Actually I just read that tooth decay is on the rise because many of us no longer drink tap water wwhich is forified with floride. From what I understand this is basically a electrochemical process which artficially bonds the floride to our teeth.

    2. Re:Would this affect coloring? by jsantos · · Score: 1

      Which reminds me of this article. You may want to start worrying about that precious bodily fluids of yours.

      --
      This signature intentionally left blank
    3. Re:Would this affect coloring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming soon: Teeth in Five Shades:

      Gunmetal
      Coal
      Rust
      Desert Camo
      Plastic Gold Chrome

    4. Re:Would this affect coloring? by grcumb · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Would this process affect the coloration of the teeth?"

      No, but tooth size many change. 8^)

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    5. Re:Would this affect coloring? by Angostura · · Score: 4, Informative

      No. The natural coating of the teeth is enamel, which is largely composed of the minerals hydroxyapatite and carbonated hydroxyapatite. Fluoride ions in water or toothpaste can displace the hydrogen ions in the enamel forming fluorapatite which is more acid resistant.

      When I was a kid, I was actually subjected to sitting in a dentists chair for 15 minutes while a mould with a concentrated fluoride gel where held against my teeth.

      It looks like this company is using exactly the same type of gel and mould, but adding an electrical current to try and speed up the hydrogen replacement. I've no idea if this would work or not, but it gets my snake-oil detectors twitching just a bit.

      In terms of discolouration, I believe the advice is that children under 5 should limit exposure to fluoride toothpaste (just use a bit) to avoid white spots on their teeth, apart from that, there aren't any problems.

    6. Re:Would this affect coloring? by baKanale · · Score: 1

      I myself have porcelin veneers, which are pretty strong and nice like that. I'm sure that any staining could be fixed by putting them on (though veneers aren't cheap)

      But what I want to know is how they'd be affected by this process.

    7. Re:Would this affect coloring? by Khyber · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fluoride may protect your teeth, but it also robs your teeth of bone density by removing calcium.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re:Would this affect coloring? by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, I was actually subjected to sitting in a dentists chair for 15 minutes while a mould with a concentrated fluoride gel where held against my teeth.
      They, um, still do that? I'm 18 and I've had fluoride gel within the past year, though it's actually 1 minute, not 15. I remember when I was a young'un they just gave me fluoride sol'n in a cup to rinse and spit, and I know that the solution was used at this free dental care for inner city kids thing (Give Kids a Smile) that I volunteered at a year ago.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    9. Re:Would this affect coloring? by afaik_ianal · · Score: 0

      well a floride coating is what natrually protects our teeth, thats why tap water, and toothpaste have this as an additive.

      Oh, so the government tells us! You clearly either work for the government, or get far too much Fluoride.

    10. Re:Would this affect coloring? by Chazerizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the effect of fluoride is not real well known. It's believed to replace the phosphate ions in the main mineral of bone, which is hydroxyapatite. The result is a mineral which forms a slightly tighter crystaline matrix. This results in a greater resistance toward all forms of damage. And since the fluoride ions replace the mineral toward the edge of the teeth, its far enough away from the blood supply to be released into the general circulation.

    11. Re:Would this affect coloring? by bani · · Score: 1

      yes, i recall some studies which showed a connection between consumption of fluoridated water and reduced risk of bone fractures in elderly people. so it appears fluoride not only strengthens teeth, it strengthens bone as well. a win all around.

    12. Re:Would this affect coloring? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      ...it also robs your teeth of bone density by removing calcium.

      Er, what?

      No calcium is lost when hydroxyapatite is coverted to fluorapatite. It's a substitution of a fluorine ion (F-) for the hydroxide ion (OH-) in Ca_5(PO_4)_3(OH).

      You get some added mechanical strength with the substitution, as well as a lower solubility in acid solution--and all your calcium is still there.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    13. Re:Would this affect coloring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much flouride can cause dental caries.....however this would require an asscrapload of flouride

    14. Re:Would this affect coloring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even know WTF dental caries are?

    15. Re:Would this affect coloring? by milletre · · Score: 1

      Fluoride may protect your teeth, but it also robs your teeth of bone density by removing calcium.



      Fluoride is problematic if swallowed, for still-developing teeth and bone. No such thing as too much topical fluoride, though.

    16. Re:Would this affect coloring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the only people who need to worry about fluoride-stained teeth are kids who will loose those (baby) teeth in a couple of years?

    17. Re:Would this affect coloring? by rockstar1o9 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. I guess it would make sense to have your teeth whitened right before.

    18. Re:Would this affect coloring? by Angostura · · Score: 1

      That's actually a very good point. Logically you should be right. I must admit I ripped the factoid about tooth discolouration from the CDC's page here. It's not particularly clear on the point.

    19. Re:Would this affect coloring? by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Flouride can also have a number of real (and perceived) negative health benefits.

      I'm not saying that Flouride ranks all the way up there with Cyanoide, but part of the reasoning behind removing Flouride from water systems is that it gets ingested when in the water every day, where at a dentist's office or in tooth paste, it is customarily spit back out.

      Since the contact of the Flouride with the tooth is what most people are after, I don't see any need to swallow the stuff afterwards. However, in it's own way, the Flouride / no Flouride in the public water systems argument is more heated (and relevant) than the Emacs / vi debate.

      I mean, with the wrong text editor, you only FEEL like you're dying. :)

    20. Re:Would this affect coloring? by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      "subjected to sitting in a dentists chair for 15 minutes while a mould with a concentrated fluoride gel where held against my teeth"

      Hey I remember that. **HIGH FIVE** It's a lot of fun trying not to choke on your own saliva being produced in gallons to try to dissolve that sour stuff.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    21. Re:Would this affect coloring? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > fluoride not only strengthens teeth, it strengthens bone as well. a win all around.

      Nice effect, but not necessarily an "all-around" good thing. Good for bones, but what does it do to OTHER tissue? Does it replace other ions in soft tissue that should not be replaced?

    22. Re:Would this affect coloring? by bani · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "what if fluoride causes acne?" "what if fluoride causes global warming?" "what if fluoride knocks the earth off its orbit?" "what if fluoride brings about the second coming?"

      If there were some detrimental effect from fluoridated water, we would have seen some observable difference in effects on populations receiving fluoridated water vs those receiving non fluoridated water in the past 60 years don't you think? But the only difference we observe is a marked reduction in tooth decay in the population receiving fluoridated water. If there is any other difference, it is so small as to be unmeasurable by modern statistical methods.

      I'm open to evidence, if you have any. Playing "what if?" games is a silly waste of time.

      fluoridated water, along with vaccination and family planning, are a few of the major public health accomplishments of the 20th century. yet you will find very vocal detractors for each of them.

  3. Broccoli by fishybell · · Score: 4, Funny

    However, when pressed, the company acknowledged the new device would be ineffective against pieces of broccoli and spinach.

    --
    ><));>
    1. Re:Broccoli by shiafu · · Score: 3, Funny
      Marge: No desert until you eat your broccoli. [Homer takes some broccoli, chokes on it and dies] [cut to a shot of Dr. Hibbert examining Homer's body]

      Hibbert: Mm. Another broccoli-related death.

      Marge: I thought broccoli was ...

      Hibbert: Oh, yes. one of the deadliest plants on earth. Why, it tries to warn you itself with its terrible taste.

  4. NIMM by 42Penguins · · Score: 0

    Not in my mouth...please?

    Any chemodentists (dentochemists?) have anything to say about this? 5 years sounds pretty crazy for one treatment.

    1. Re:NIMM by eepok · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Everythings sounds crazy until you find out it works. Lots of people thought it was crazy to implent porcelain teeth with titanium roots that bond to bone... but it happened. AND they're not suceptible to rot.

    2. Re:NIMM by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      I don't know any of the details, but when I was a kid, I had a number of "sealing" treatments to my molars that were meant to provide 10-15 years of cavity protection.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    3. Re:NIMM by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Sealants are just an acrylic filling.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    4. Re:NIMM by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 2, Informative
      Lots of people thought it was crazy to implent porcelain teeth with titanium roots that bond to bone...

      Hate to nit-pick, but as far as I'm aware (could be wrong) but titanium does not bond with bone. Titanium is used due to the excellent mechanical proporties it possesses. However it has to be coated via plasma spraying with hydroxyapatite, which does bond with both bone and titanium.

      Happened to have a lecture the covered this subject the other day.

    5. Re:NIMM by bani · · Score: 1

      nobody thought it was crazy. in fact it was bleedin' obvious because titanium is used for bone implants for that very reason.

    6. Re:NIMM by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      I had those, too, and they lasted more than 15 years. They aren't completely gone yet, but they've worn away in most spots. My dentist said they don't apply sealants as often as they used to, because they're afraid they'll seal in decay that they'd missed. But I can't help but wonder if, in fact, the sealants worked a little too well.

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  5. Right audience by woozlewuzzle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, this is at least correctly targeted towards the /. crowd, most of whom only brush once every 5 years (whether they need it or not)

    1. Re:Right audience by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      If only they could infuse the teeth with a fresh, minty taste and scent!

    2. Re:Right audience by oringo · · Score: 1

      Greeat! I've always been looking for an excuse for not brushing my teeth...

    3. Re:Right audience by mmmiiikkkeee · · Score: 1

      agreed... i never brush my teeth... if this works... i might have a chance with the ladies :)

    4. Re:Right audience by Kuvter · · Score: 1

      Do I have to brush my teeth and have this? Or would that make it last for more than 5 years? I didn't, like most /.'s, RFTA.

      Otherwise: YAY, no brushing for 5 years...

      ...6 years later: DOH, I missed my 5 year check up again

      --
      "To be is to do." --Socrates
      "To do is to be." -- Aristotle
      "Do-Be-Do-Be-Do..." --Sinatra
  6. Great idea... by Xymor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Go to the dentist and get a free shock-therapy session. This should help those with Dentophobia.

    1. Re:Great idea... by hnile_jablko · · Score: 1

      A way to overcome dentophodia?
      Mate of mine visits a dentist in sydney "very frequently" who gases (the good laughing kind of gas) him every time, has a stack of CDs to choose from which compliment your high and some cool mood lighting....

      cant say i have been to this "dentist" since anyone so willing to gas people and apply dental technique must have another agenda.... visions of marathon man prevent me from visiting this guy.

  7. Wouldn't dentists fight this? by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny
    Somehow I have this horrible feeling that Dentists here in the US would do everything in their power to make sure these things never get used; think of how much money they would lose if no one got cavities anymore.


    Luckily I bet I can improvise one of my one; all I need is an old lamp cord, a football mouthpiece, and some high fluoride gel toothpaste.

    1. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually I've noticed a disturbing trend. Now that more and more people have "good teeth" (because a larger and larger % of the popullation has been brushing their teeth all their life), dentists are "diversifying."

      Whereas before they would only fix cavities, now they are telling me that I need a tissue graft from my pallet onto a receeding section of my gums, that I need cleanings every 6 months at least, and that more orthodontic work wouldn't hurt either. After getting second opinions, I've determined that most of what they are suggesting is unnecessary... Basically they are trying to maintain their revenue stream by going after more obscure and largely non-worrisome problems.

      Yes this is based on my own anecdotal experience (and talking to others), so it's a highly skewed opinion. But it seems to me that dentists are "inventing" new problems to treat and deal with, since the core problem (cavities, etc.) has been solved satisfactorily.

    2. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did you grow up? The town that served as the inspiration for "Deliverance?" I grew up in the midwest and had some of these treatments as a kid in the early 80s. Dentists are concerned with your mouth's health, and they should notice problems with your gums. It's been common to have cleanings/checkups every six months for at least the 30-some years I've been around.

    3. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty odd, considering the dental occupation has such a high suicide rate.... my dentist committed suicide, so I'm really looking forward to a USB-Powerd Tooth-decay prevention system.

    4. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going every six months is alright in my mind, but I do agree that dentists are now not so much about health care as more about their wallets. I have personally heard from an individual who was a business manager that many dentist offices work like this:

      every morning, everyone meets for a few minutes to go over the day, who is coming, and who has what for insurance (what will their insurance cover). Person who owns the business looks at how much they need to break even, and line the pockets of the doctors. Then, figures out who needs fillings, root canals, etc. You honestly think going once every 6 months pays their bills? They try to milk you when they can, and honestly I'm all for this new process! To hell with being thet dental industry's sap of the day! ...ok so honestly yes there are some good dentists out there, and yes they do help when there are legitimate problems...but really, what's to prevent a dentist from saying you have a cavity when you don't, when was the last time you got at second opinion about a cavity?

    5. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by cibyr · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but here dentists are in short supply - my dentist is booked out till October! As long as it works and doesn't have any nasty side effects I'm sure they'd welcome it with open arms - it's the public that might not like it, just like they don't like flouride.

      --
      It's not exactly rocket surgery.
    6. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by segfault_0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they were going to fight dental health, i think they would have made their move at the toothbrush.

      --

      I was crazy back when being crazy really meant something. (Charles Manson)
    7. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by NilObject · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You are painfully on target. (Pun intended, I guess.)

      I spent my Senior year in High School going through a series of "necessary" gingival grafts. The pain was excruciating because the Viccodin didn't do much for me and I ended up not taking it because it screwed with my attention span, which was bad when I was drilling myself through AP Calculus and English among other things (girlfriend included!).

      It turns out that everyone in my family has "receding" gums. That's just how they are - small. The doctor made a few thousand dollars, I got one cool picture of my shredded mouth roof. Exciting. Thank you, profit motive!

    8. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by jrutley · · Score: 1
      I haven't had a cavity since I was six, yet the dentist gets $140 twice a year from me (and my insurance company).
      That's the *bare minimum* that the dentist charges, not including cancellations ($50?)

      So let's pretend that everyone paid the bare minimum. Let's say they get that every 1/2 hour from 8:30am to 11:30am, and from 1:00pm to 4:30pm. My dentist's schedule looks like that, and every spot is filled months in advance, so there aren't too many gaps. That's 14 x $140, or $1960/day, minus expenses. Say that's 48 weeks in a year, 5 days a week, and it's suddenly $470400 that the office takes in in a year. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't mind taking in that much just to clean people's teeth.

      Think of what dentists could charge to have this done.

    9. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Or rather, it would be another service that the Dentist would sell. There is money to be made in selling all those add-ons.

      "Would you like teeth whitening today?"
      "Oh, those old metal fillings wear out over time. Would you like some new ceramic fillings instead?"

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    10. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      but I wouldn't mind taking in that much just to clean people's teeth.

      Except that most of your clients have nasty breath.

    11. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minus the office... You got to pay the staff too I guess... Then there is the supplys... And the expensive X-Ray machine and drills... Those chairs and not cheap either... People cancel alot since everybody hates to go to the dentist... Also you need insurance... You also have to pay the dential hygenist that actually does the cleaning... hmmm I guess gross profit does not equal net profit, go figure?

    12. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by asr_man · · Score: 1

      Why is this so purprising to you? Dentists are people who need to make a living, and "marketing" services that might be of use to you is nothing so out of the ordinary. It's true that dentists have the cachet of doctors and (at first) seem to imbue their recommendations with the same assumed trust by the patient, but really...you're a big boy, make your own choices.

      Yes, much of what such dentists might recommend could be perceived as optional treatment. So make that judgement for yourself. Oral health is not a black and white situation. Some people see it as a necessary evil and just make sure there's no continuous dental pain. Others are more concerned with how their teeth and smile affect their emotional expressiveness and the image they project to others. Both are prefectly valid -- it's just a personal choice. A good dentist will make sure you aren't left behind in making those choices.

      OTOH if you feel pressured by a dentist to have a certain procedure the by all means seek out 2nd and even 3rd opinions. It's usually much less expensive than just capitulating to treatment and later finding out you shouldn't have. Dentists vary widely in their competence, as I well know from experience.

    13. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't understand how dentists work. First, they will declare that this procedure is too risky for any but a qualified professional to administer, and then they will charge for it what you would have paid for 8 years of normal dental care.

    14. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 0

      While I would agree that dentists along w/ many other medial professions over-diagnose things and recommend unnessecary procedures, I have trouble believing its because of a lack of business. Have you tried getting an appointment lately? In my neck of the woods, 2-3 month waiting minimum for a standard appointment. Maybe scheduling with a dentist that is scheduled far out is a way to avoid the crackpot's.

      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    15. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      You know I think you are absolutely on to something there. I'm 40 years old and I'm missing a tooth. It's the second to the last molar on the left lower side and I lost it when I was 18 years old. My family was dirt poor at the time and I was no longer covered under my mom's dental plan since I'd just graduated high school. I had a huge filling come off one day and instantly begin hurting like hell. I went to my dentist who said "I can save that tooth. You need a root canal and that's going to cost $_____". Ok, so I don't remember what he said it was going to cost at the time but I remember that it might as well have been a billion dollars. I didn't have the money and so I asked him about pulling it. He refused. I went downstairs in the same building where a dental clinic was and I think they charged me $60 to pull the tooth. They also said they could save it and that I was making a mistake but I just couldn't afford to have the work done and I was a moron at 18 with a bad tooth ache who just wanted it to end.

        Ever since that day I've been told that my teeth would shift to some terrible degree and that I need to get that taken care of as soon as possible by every dentist I've ever been to see. Bullshit. My teeth are just as straight today as they were then or so close to being straight that I can't tell the difference and nor can my wife or kids. It's total bullshit. I'm not saying it's not possible but if it was going to happen then it would have happened by now I think. If this is 20+ years worth of shifting then I'm not going to give somebody a bunch of cash to help me prevent what might happen in the next 20 years.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    16. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by Elminst · · Score: 1

      And that's _before_ you drill into an abcessed tooth that has been decomposing happily for the past 2-3 months.
      I was working on a network at a dentist's office on a day they're normally closed. They brought in a patient on a special appointment because he had the above problem. Less than 2 minutes after he started drilling, the entire office from lobby to back room smelled of DEATH. It was NASTY.
      He and the nurse were taking regular breaks just so they could breathe.

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    17. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by tigersaw · · Score: 1

      Exactly who did you get a second opinion from if all dentists are in the profession to make money off unnecessary surgery? Please think before making blanket ad hominem attacks. Yes, there are both bad dentists and good dentists, and unfortunately, just like any other service, you need to separate the wheat from the chaff to get the best results.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, all our base are belong to you!
    18. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Same here, only I was a sucker and got the root canal.

      They also said my wisdom teeth are going to have to come out, or by the time I was twenty-five I'd be in horrible pain and have crooked teeth. I'm thirty and no pain and no crooked teeth.

      Funny, too, how the root canal was in the only damned tooth I ever previously let them work on. They drilled that guy and filled him, and I'll be damned if that filling didn't keep popping out and have to be replaced, each time with supposedly better and more expensive dentist.

    19. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by FFFish · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%. Every time I've gone in for a teeth cleaning, the staff have oohed-and-aahed over the beautiful condition of my teeth. "Gosh, you must floss!" they exlaim. No, I don't.

      I have had three cleanings in twenty years. To my mind, their response rather indicates that it is only necessary to brush well twice daily.

      YMMV.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    20. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >telling me that I need a tissue graft from my pallet onto a receeding section of
      >my gums, that I need cleanings every 6 months at least, and that more orthodontic
      >work wouldn't hurt either.

      in my neck of the woods, dentists do not perform the above procedures. oral surgeons do tissue grafts, hygienists clean teeth, and orthodontists do braces. with the exception of cleanings done by hygienists who often work in a dentist's office, i dont think that dentists are actually getting a cut out of any of the above procedures.

    21. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by identity0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      the Viccodin didn't do much for me and I ended up not taking it because it screwed with my attention span, which was bad when I was drilling myself through AP Calculus and English among other things (girlfriend included!).

      You were "drilling your way" through your girlfriend? Ouch. Did you at least give *her* some Vicodin?

    22. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by milletre · · Score: 1
      Ever since that day I've been told that my teeth would shift to some terrible degree and that I need to get that taken care of as soon as possible by every dentist I've ever been to see. Bullshit. My teeth are just as straight today as they were then or so close to being straight that I can't tell the difference and nor can my wife or kids. It's total bullshit.

      What should a dentist tell you? If he doesn't tell you about this possibility (no it's not a certainty), you could not only damage other probably decay-free teeth beyond repair or need lots of very expensive orthodontic treatment to re-create the space if you decide to restore the area by replacing the missing tooth.



      If he doesn't tell you about the possibilty of tooth movement, he is then wide open for lawsuit. "The dentist never told me my teeth would move, and now I've damaged decay-free teeth beyond repair and need lots of very expensive orthodontic treatment." There goes ten days of productivity in the office and $10,000 dealing with that crap.



      How many patients have you treated for post-extraction mesial drift/tilt? How many sets of radiographs have you reviewed where you've seen this phenomenon? I have personally seen hundreds. You were fortunate your teeth didn't move; it doesn't mean your dentist is a crook.

    23. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by lukesl · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine is going to dental school, and I've talked with him about this before. He said that there's a lot fewer cavities than there used to be, but that's offset by the fact that there's less dentists than there used to be. Also, he said that doing fillings is one of the less profitable things that a dentist can do, and despite the fact that fluoridated water has decreased cavities dramatically, most people will still lose all their teeth to periodontal disease because they don't floss. Interestingly, that's apparently the big unsolved problem in dentistry, to find a high-tech method to replace flossing, which works well, but people simply won't do it, and those that don't do it will eventually lose all their teeth.

    24. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Basically they are trying to maintain their revenue stream by going after more obscure and largely non-worrisome problems.

      I've been to a variety of dentists over the years, and almost all of them struck me as greedy bastards of low intelligence and low ethics. To them, my mouth is primarily viewed as the source of their next boat payment.

      Until I discovered the dental school at the nearby $LARGE_UNIVERSITY. The profs at this school maintain a practice on the side, but (a) they actually know what they are doing, and (b) are less motivated by money. (If they were money-driven, they'd be practicing full time and pulling down twice the income.)

    25. Re:Wouldn't dentists fight this? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Ok look man, you're completely misinterpreting what I'm saying. I had this done when I was 18. Through my 20's I heard the warnings about my teeth shifting. For the most part I wouldn't characterize them as "informing of the possibility". I'd say that they were more along the lines of "That's really serious and you need to get that taken care of as soon as possible! Talk to the receptionist and she'll get you scheduled for an appointment before it's too late".

        In my 30's I still got this. Now I'm 40 and if I see a different dentist at the clinic I go to then I fully expect to hear about the terrible risk I'm running. I'm 40 years old for crying out loud. You would think that by now they might lay off the hard sell just a bit don't you?

        I'm glad you've reviewed hundreds of radiographs. Good on you! I've "reviewed" exactly one set of teeth in the mirror and those were mine. They haven't moved.

        Inform me of the possibility my teeth might move? I absolutely appreciate it. Try to sell me a procedure I do not need for twenty years? I don't think so. Not every dentist out there is just trying to make sure we all have the healthiest mouths possible. Some of them are trying to make enough money to pay the note on the Benz.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  8. I guess Lucille was telling the truth by Furmy · · Score: 1

    Think reception will improve?

  9. Bring on the Mountain Dew! by ToxikFetus · · Score: 5, Funny

    We'll see how well that 5-year warranty holds up after I'm through with it!

  10. Heh by christoofar · · Score: 1

    But... does it run Linux?

    1. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, comedy gold

    2. Re:Heh by lastchance_000 · · Score: 1

      Or at least silver amalgam. Thank you, I'm here all week!

  11. Bring on the Energy Drinks! by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sweet! (literally) Now I can just rinse with Red Bull before bed time and I'm set.

  12. I Don't Know About You... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but, I'm somewhat reluctant to even try anything that claims to put a coating on my teeth that will last for 5 years. What happens if you don't like it or if you have sensitive teeth that react to this "flouridation" and cause you pain?

    It's one thing to electroplate your refrigerator, it's another thing entirely to electroplate your teeth. Although, these guys would probably give it a go.

  13. Don't have to brush then? by thomasa · · Score: 1

    I guess we wouldn't have to brush our teeth for 5 years then! Cool!

    1. Re:Don't have to brush then? by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      Eww, do you know how gross that would be? It's not just about cavities. There is gum disease, bad breath, umm and other stuff to worry about.

      Maybe I'm just a bit compulsive but if I miss brushing my teeth in the morning, by night my teeth can feel pretty grimy (no I don't eat a lot of sugar).

    2. Re:Don't have to brush then? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Maybe I'm just a bit compulsive but if I miss brushing my teeth in the morning, by night my teeth can feel pretty grimy (no I don't eat a lot of sugar).

      Shouldn't make a lick of difference (unless you're eating at night after you brush).

  14. How does it get below the gum line? by winkydink · · Score: 4, Informative

    The nasties really happen below 3mm (anaeorobic bacteria). Even your denatal hygenist can't do much below 3mm (though you can have your gums reduced). How does the gel get down there if your dentist can't?

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:How does it get below the gum line? by ted · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... up the voltage.

    2. Re:How does it get below the gum line? by weeb0 · · Score: 0

      The way I understand the way it works, it build another layer of protection in front of the enamel. The bacteria causing the cavity will have to fight the new protection then attack the enamel. I don't think the fluorure can penetrate the enamel. It's possible for kids, but not for adults.

    3. Re:How does it get below the gum line? by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      It doesn't get down there. It prevents pitting of the teeth the same way that anodizing prevents pitting of aluminum:

      By creating a barrier tough enough that the nasties can't get down 3mm themselves.

      KFG

    4. Re:How does it get below the gum line? by SuperSimba · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the type of tooth decay that this treatment is trying to prevent is decay on enamel surfaces. Through ion replacement, the fluoride would strengthen the ion matrix in the enamel only. Cementum, which covers the tooth below the natural tooth's crown (under your original gumline) obtains its hardness from mineralized organic material rather than inorganic ion matrix, so theoretically, the treatment will not benefit these areas. You're right, anaerobes will still be an issue, and periodontal health will still be at risk without good oral hygiene.

  15. This just makes me wonder by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

    What could possibly go wrong? /rhetorical question

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
  16. funny... by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1

    ...that you posted that under Hardware. I thought of the crumbling difference between hardware and software...

    --
    I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  17. fluor ions? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

    WTF are "fluor ions"?

    1. Re:fluor ions? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      F-, fluoride ions.

      Many of the elements--especially those in the first two rows, as well as many p-block and mostly-full d-block--have different names in other languages, owing to their early discovery.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    2. Re:fluor ions? by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      Fluorine. Presumably the electrity adds energy to the system speeding the chemical reaction that would happen anyway between fluoride and the tooth enamel.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    3. Re:fluor ions? by Mahou · · Score: 2, Funny

      it's a typo of flour ions. instead of getting cavities you make bread

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    4. Re:fluor ions? by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 0

      Anyone think of teflon when they read this?

  18. thank god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most /.ers needed another excuse to not brush regularly, and now they have one. this is indeed a happy day.

  19. Stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your acidic saliva is quite capable of destroying a lot of bacteria

    Stupid twat! If you had acidic saliva you wouldn't have any teeth. If your saliva isn't PH7 you better see a doctor/dentist immediately!

    1. Re:Stupid... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > If your saliva isn't PH7 you better see a doctor/dentist immediately!

      You need to calm down...
      After googling, I read conflicting reports: one place said that Saliva should have a Ph of approximately 6.4 and another said 7.4. But it is generally not 7.0.

  20. I'm waiting for a buckytube coating, myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I want to be able to chew gravel in comfort.

  21. Mountain Dew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is an effective mouth wash, right?

    1. Re:Mountain Dew by grim4593 · · Score: 1

      You mean some people believe it isn't? :P

  22. Other approaches by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 3, Informative
    What is the latest on ... Enquiring minds want to know.
    1. Re:Other approaches by Verteiron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I fully expect all such measures to be blocked in the USA by the ADA.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    2. Re:Other approaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative


      More links to the pile

      Oragenics (Genetically Modified Replacement)
      More than a mouthfull

  23. fluoride is toxic waste by Randall_Jones · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ok, I'm preparing for the tin foil hat jokes, but fluoride's actually not good for people. Granted, a treatment that binds fluoride to the surface of the teeth is better than drinking it, but I'd prefer if we didn't fuck with fluoride at all. Almost all fluoride that's produced is merely a biproduct of other chemical reactions. If city governments didn't buy this stuff from chemical plants to put in drinking water, they'd have to dispose of it like any other toxic waste.

    1. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Thats the typical "industrial waste" strawman argument...
      Guess what, chemical substances are created as byproducts and used otherwise all the time.

      Just giving it bad names isnt an argument by itself, and most stuff the body needs can kill him in too high dosage, so the "isnt healthy" can also be streched FAAAAAAR into the real of propaganda.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Almost all fluoride that's produced is merely a biproduct of other chemical reactions. If city governments didn't buy this stuff from chemical plants to put in drinking water, they'd have to dispose of it like any other toxic waste.

      Concentrated nitric acid is also toxic waste. Dilute nitric acid makes a pretty decent plant fertilizer.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    3. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by LTB_Enterprises · · Score: 1

      Major urban myth stuff, much like the controversy over Triclosan which hit Aus recently. I work with a rabid veggo/health/alternate therapy nut and even she uses fluoride toothpaste. Unless you use mass amounts there is no danger to fluoride toothpastes and water supplementation and their efficacy has been proved. Queensland is a state with no water fluoridation and their decay rates are in general higher than other states in Australia. However, if you want an alternate to fluoride in order to remineralize your teeth (because that's what fluoride is doing, not killing bacteria) you should try Toothmousse or Recaldent, both containing CPP-ACP which is a milk casein protein. It remineralizes teeth which is a major barrier to acid attack and has no overdose issues. And just for interest's sake, most decay is caused by incomplete removal of existing decay at the time of fillings. Even a little left will continue the decay process leading to cavities forming under fillings.

    4. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by ajlitt · · Score: 5, Funny

      If city governments didn't buy this stuff from chemical plants to put in drinking water, they'd have to dispose of it like any other toxic waste.
      It's not the city governments or plants that are doing this to us. It's the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. Duh.

    5. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by markmier · · Score: 1

      "A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard-core Commie works."

      POE
      PEO
      EPO
      EOP
      OEP
      OPE

    6. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you know oxygen is a poison too! better stop breathing man, the air is just full of that toxic poison, 'oxygen' all those fad 'anti-oxidants' you read about won't protect you! they'll only slow the effects of 'oxygen poisoning' which ultimately results in death!

      interestingly enough though perhaps the 'bad oral hygine' in japan is related to their 'higher iq' and the 'recent drop in children's iqs in the uk' are related to recent pressure to improve oral hygine in children!

      BTW they do sell fluoride free tooth pastes, and your plain old baking soda with some ground mint leaves will make for a very effective DIY, minty dentifrice.

    7. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by Randall_Jones · · Score: 2, Interesting

      when in doubt, I tend to believe the group that doesn't have a monetary interest in the outcome, and fluorinating municipal water supplies subsidizes the chemical industry--guys who have influence and deep pockets. Second, flouride treatment is only effective when it's in contact with the teeth, actually absorbing it into your blood stream is unneccessary, if there's any question about possible adverse health effects, why expose yourself to something that's unneccessary. Third, fluoride has no dosage control, someone who uses hippy organic toothpaste and generally drinks bottled water is getting doses wildly different from someone who cooks with and drinks 8 glasses of tap water a day. Seems like a hamfisted dental hygeine policy to me. That said, yes, I tend to have faith in the CDC, this is just something else to consider.

    8. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by greenegg77 · · Score: 1

      If city governments didn't buy this stuff from chemical plants to put in drinking water, they'd have to dispose of it like any other toxic waste.



      Don't forget that dihydrogen monoxide is also a toxic waste product (just try breathing it!) in many applications, yet cities also mix that with the water you drink.

      --
      --- This .sig for sale - $500 OBO.
    9. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by baKanale · · Score: 1

      Almost all fluoride that's produced is merely a biproduct of other chemical reactions. If city governments didn't buy this stuff from chemical plants to put in drinking water, they'd have to dispose of it like any other toxic waste.

      Almost all manure that's produced is merely a biproduct of other livestock. If gardeners didn't buy this stuff from farmers to put in their vegetable gardens, they'd have to dispose of it like any other toxic waste to keep it from contaminating the water table.

      The verdict on flouride is still controvertial. But just because something is a "waste" or "byproduct" doesn't mean that it's nescessarily bad.

    10. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by LTB_Enterprises · · Score: 1

      "when in doubt, I tend to believe the group that doesn't have a monetary interest in the outcome, and fluorinating municipal water supplies subsidizes the chemical industry--guys who have influence and deep pockets."

      So this is why dentists, perhaps the group with the largest interest in maintaining rates of tooth decay, recommend fluoride products?

      "Second, flouride treatment is only effective when it's in contact with the teeth, actually absorbing it into your blood stream is unneccessary,"

      Systemic fluoride is effective because the fluoride ions are excreted in saliva which your teeth are constantly surrounded by. This is why patients with "dry mouth syndrome" are prescribed fluoride gels/rinses, because the saliva isn't there to buffer the acid attack.

    11. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by posterlogo · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to side with the science on this one rather than your tin hat website. Even if I didn't believe the published and peer-reviewed studies, I know from my own work in a biology lab that an alkaline substance such as fluoride ion is going to reverse the acidification caused by bacteria. At 0.15% w/v, it's certainly not toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic. And that's just toothpaste which you probably don't eat... Drinking water has less. If you don't want to use fluoride toothpaste, please be my guest and see how long your teeth last. If you want to talk about toxic substances used to deal with dental issues, talk about alcohol. That stuff will kill the bacteria too, but as opposed to fluoride, it is a known toxin and carcinogen.

    12. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Too much of anything will kill you.
      I think the millions thay drink florida that aren't falling over dead does hold some evidence of it's validity.

      BTW, public water also has clorine and amonia in it. OMG!

      Also, as little as ONE(1) cup of water can KILL YOU! ba ba BAAAaaaa

      All evidence point to floride in proper dosage is not harmfull.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Third, fluoride has no dosage control,..."
      when talking about flouridated water, that is patently false.

      also, bottle water doesn;t really have flouride in it.

      "when in doubt, I tend to believe the group that doesn't have a monetary interest in the outcome, and fluorinating municipal water supplies subsidizes the chemical industry--guys who have influence and deep pockets."

      nice knee jerk and pointless exercise.
      When I am in doubt, I look at the science and existing evidence.
      Plus the ADA would never have lobbied for it if everyones motive was money.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by Randall_Jones · · Score: 1

      unlike, say, global warming, there's scientific evidence on both sides of this argument. I've found a more exhaustive list before, but I'm too lazy to dig it up, but here are links to a few studies that indicate brain damage can occur at blood plasma levels easily reachable from typical ingestion of fluorinated drinking water. http://fluoride-journal.com/03-36-2/362-084.pdf http://www.fluoride-journal.com/00-33-2/332-74.pdf http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/brain/varner-1 998.pdf http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/brain/mullenix 1995.pdf http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/brain/idd.html

    15. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by afaik_ianal · · Score: 1

      Thats the typical "industrial waste" strawman argument...
      Perfect example of course is the fact that dihydrogen monoxide is also a common industrial waste.

    16. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging from your post, it's not the fluoride you should be worried about but instead the massive amount of paint chips (wall candy!) you seem to have consumed.

    17. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Megadildoes, Rush!

    18. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      Its not the fluoride in the water supply you should be worrying about, its the dihydrogen monoxide. DHMO kills millions every year.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    19. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh... I think he meant there's no evidence AGAINST global warming. not quite the attitude of a rush limbaugh fan.

    20. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by Randall_Jones · · Score: 1

      "Third, fluoride has no dosage control,..." when talking about flouridated water, that is patently false. when I say there's no dosage control, I don't mean in terms of parts per million. of course that's regulated. I mean that someone who drinks 8 glasses of tap water a day gets a much larger dose than someone who drinks only one.

    21. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by posterlogo · · Score: 1

      You must be joking. Have you looked at the article listings in those fringe journals? Those guys are practically anti-fluoride think tankers. From browsing a few I'd say it's a miracle we're not all dead already if you believe half of what they say about fluoride. Try looking through the New England Journal of Medicine, or some other reputable journals. You'll find interesting results about fluoride there too, no need to consult the fluoride society. The point is that far more reputable research has proven the benefits of fluoridating water. Anyway, back to TFA -- a semi-permanent fluoride layer on your teeth will significantly delay tooth decay.

    22. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by posterlogo · · Score: 1

      You've hit on an interesting point. People who drink bottled water (unfluoridated, obviously) tend to have a HIGHER incidence of tooth decay: http://www.medpagetoday.com/PrimaryCare/DentalHeal th/tb/1756

    23. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      It's not the city governments or plants that are doing this to us. It's the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. Duh.

      This is the 21st century; we call them "terrorists" now, not "Communists".

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    24. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by bani · · Score: 1

      shh, dont go poking holes in peoples cherished conspiracy theories.

    25. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by bani · · Score: 1

      you'd die of water poisoning before you'd suffer adverse effects from any fluoride in tap water. a small amount is better than zero, if it reduces risks of decay and has virtually no negative effects.

      why not whinge about chlorinated water? the concentrations are far higher and chlorine is extremely toxic (which is why it was used in WWI as a weapon).

    26. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by msloan · · Score: 1

      Yep, just 3.2 grams of pure caffeine administered intravaneously has a good chance at killing you. (this is the lowest reported lethal dose) 10 grams though - man, your dead.

    27. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      So this is why dentists, perhaps the group with the largest interest in maintaining rates of tooth decay, recommend fluoride products?

      One major contrast between this and fluoride in drinking water: read the instructions on said "fluoride products". Do they EVER say to ingest them? I'll answer for you: no. My tube of fluoridated toothpaste explicitly says not to swallow any of the product.

    28. Re:fluoride is toxic waste by LTB_Enterprises · · Score: 1

      We've just reached the age-old dosage issue. Water fluoridation is at a rate of between 0.7 ppm and 1.2 ppm, the average fluoride toothpaste is a rate of 1000 ppm. An average fluoride gel can get up to 12,3000!! ppm but Colgate in Australia has removed this from the market except for professional clinical use and so your average patient is unlikely to be exposing themselves to such a high dose on a regular basis. Signs such as fluorosis (discolouration and pitting of the teeth) are likely to appear quite early in relation to systemic harm. This diseases has been known to be common in areas with water sources naturally high in fluoride but is easily reversible.

  24. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it safe?

  25. Sounds Expensive by Joebert · · Score: 1

    Electro-chemical reaction in which fluor ions displace the Hydroxide ions at the outer layer of the tooth

    Hell, for $50 I'll displace the whole tooth with a "2 X flour".
    I'll even toss in my grandmas dentures for free. :)

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:Sounds Expensive by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Damn, a typo can kill a good joke. :(
      "flour" "fluor"

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  26. Re:Cool to see the Palestinian/Israeli cooperation by pclminion · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Not all the Arabs in Israel are Palestinian. That doesn't rule out the possibility that Khawaled and Zuabi might be Palestinian but it wouldn't be my first guess.

  27. Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  28. The Lobbying begins by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny

    FDA lobbying begins: US Dental Assocaition vs Energizer Bunny!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  29. Re:Cool to see the Palestinian/Israeli cooperation by Ossifer · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Not all the Arabs in Israel are Palestinian.
    Not all the tea in China is Chinese... What's your point?
    That doesn't rule out the possibility that Khawaled and Zuabi might be Palestinian but it wouldn't be my first guess.
    Care to say why?
  30. Awesome by Eightyford · · Score: 1

    I guess this could be considered a bio-hack. Hopefully there's more of this type of treatments to come.

  31. Pass by Daemon69 · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I was 10 I tried touching a 9-volt to my braces. Nuff said.

    1. Re:Pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stripped a "live" television cable with my teeth... who knew that electricity ran through them... I think the tech I asked about it later said 30V

    2. Re:Pass by FreeBSDbigot · · Score: 1

      I stripped a "live" television cable with my teeth... who knew that electricity ran through them

      Uhhhm... how else would the signal travel through a cable?

      --
      Orange whip? Orange whip? Three orange whips.
    3. Re:Pass by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Midichlorians, duh.

    4. Re:Pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be surprised. A while back I had a surge come across the cable TV line and blow out the surge protector and the cable modem. When I explained it to two different cable TV techs, they both insisted that there is no voltage on the cable lines once it comes into your house. One of them said that there's a filter they put on it where the cable actually enters your house that strips out all voltage. They kept arguing with me in a condescending tone when I tried to explain that without voltage, the electrons won't move along the copper.

    5. Re:Pass by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      The technology uses an existing fluoride-based gel along with a device which produces a small electric current (6-9 volt, at low amperage) to achieve activation of the teeth that will enable the formation of a genuine electrolyte when activated.
      Heh.

      My immediate thought was "Nice try, my dad got me with that joke already"

      FYI - a "dead" battery.... isn't. Especially a "dead" 9-Volt battery
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:Pass by vidarh · · Score: 1
      I stripped a "live" television cable with my teeth...

      I did it to a phone line as I was wiring an extension to hook up my modem. Which was not a problem, until someone called, at which point everything went white for a second or so... Thankfully I dropped the wire before the second ring. My tongue was kind of numb for a few minutes, though.

  32. Well, you kinda deserve tinfoil hat jokes by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok so you found a site with an agenda: Eliminating flouride consumption, that claims it's bad. Right, of course they are going to claim that. Now I can find information from respected orignizations, like the CDC and NIH, that says it's not only fine but good for oral health.

    http://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/waterfluoridation/in dex.htm
    http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/HealthInformation/Disease sAndConditions/Fluoride/WaterFluoridation.htm

    Now I don't care to argue with you about who to believe, I'm just pointing you that you are presenting only a source with an agenda. Have a look at what the CDC has to say, as well as others.

    1. Re:Well, you kinda deserve tinfoil hat jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we all know that sites ending in .gov have no hidden agenda :)

    2. Re:Well, you kinda deserve tinfoil hat jokes by lukesl · · Score: 1

      I thought I'd add this, a review published in the BMJ that does a meta-analysis of 214 existing public health studies on public water fluoridation. It basically finds that it is safe and effective.

    3. Re:Well, you kinda deserve tinfoil hat jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government doesn't have an agenda? JUST LOOK AROUND, MAN!

      Sheesh.

      Anyway, their (your) claims would make much more sense if they used naturally occurring calcium fluoride, as is found normally in bodies of water, instead of using industrial waste from fertilizer companies! Agenda indeed.

  33. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israelis...
    1 time operation on your teeth....

    Conspiracy theories forming!

  34. Dental Shock-Therapy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hrrmm... I've already had plenty of shock-therapy from dentists. I'd be glad of some move away from medieval barbarism on their part :)

  35. Is it safe? by Ranger · · Score: 1

    It sounds like you are electroplating your teeth. I figured it would be some kind of electroshock therapy:

    "Brush your teeth, Timmy or I'll have to send for The White Angel to come and ask you 'Is it safe?' "

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  36. It's a commie plot! by Mille+Mots · · Score: 3, Funny
    General Jack D. Ripper: Mandrake, do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water, why, there are studies underway to fluoridate salt, flour, fruit juices, soup, sugar, milk... ice cream. Ice cream, Mandrake, children's ice cream.

    Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Lord, Jack.

    General Jack D. Ripper: You know when fluoridation first began?

    Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: I... no, no. I don't, Jack.

    General Jack D. Ripper: Nineteen hundred and forty-six. Nineteen forty-six, Mandrake. How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard-core Commie works.

    Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Uh, Jack, Jack, listen, tell me, tell me, Jack. When did you first... become... well, develop this theory?

    General Jack D. Ripper: Well, I, uh... I... I... first became aware of it, Mandrake, during the physical act of love.

    Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm.

    General Jack D. Ripper: Yes, a uh, a profound sense of fatigue... a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I... I was able to interpret these feelings correctly. Loss of essence.

    Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm.

    General Jack D. Ripper: I can assure you it has not recurred, Mandrake. Women uh... women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I, uh... I do not avoid women, Mandrake.

    Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: No.

    General Jack D. Ripper: But I... I do deny them my essence.

    Credit to IMDB for the actual quotes. My memory of them was somewhat less than accurate. ;)

    --
    Sig nature

  37. Ridiculous by benzapp · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are many primates that subsist almost exclusively on fruit that has substantial amounts of sugar. They live for 20 years and their teeth are fine.

    The problem of tooth decay is complex, but this oft repeated lie doesn't get to the bottom of it.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
    1. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had perfect teeth for 20 years too... edging up on 30, and all of a sudden I have cavities.

    2. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They live for 20 years and their teeth are fine.

      Yes, but what about those of us who want to live for more then 20 years? The death for many of these other animals is rapidly accelerated once they loose their molars to tooth decay or for other reasons.

    3. Re:Ridiculous by posterlogo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Have you seen primates' teeth up close? They're actually pretty nasty. But you are partly right, they do have subtle differences in saliva biochemistry due to adaptation that allow them to handle sugary diets... the teeth remain usable despite the formation of cavities (ultimately the teeth are lost, as expected). Animals in captivity get rudimentary dental care, or at the least, fluorinated water. On the otherhand, your notion that many primates eat fruit exclusively is an oft repeated lie (mostly from cartoons). Fruits are a treat, and more uncommon than one might think. Sugars diets are the causative factor for increased microflora in the mouth -- the simpler the carbohydrate, the easier it is for the bacteria to fluorish (eg high fructose corn syrup). In fact, there are over 500 different species of bacteria that come onto your teeth in between twice-daily brushings. The bacteria themselves will not decay teeth as long as you keep an alkaline environment in your mouth. This is how other animals deal with them... we use brushing with fluoride ion (a base). If you'd like to test your theory, please feel free to stop using fluoride or baking soda in your dental care.

    4. Re:Ridiculous by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Informative

      The fibers in fruits usually wash away the sugars. Most processed sweets don't have any fiber, thus the sugar is deposited and stays there.

      This is also the case with honey - it's sticky and cause cavities if used as a sweetener. But it's not too dangerous eating an apple/orange without brushing your teeth for a while.

      As long as people avoid honey, processed foods with sugar or flour - you should be able to get away without brushing and have no cavities.

      However, that lifestyle and this treatment isn't going to be an end to brushing or flossing. Even if the teeth are completely protected, your gums can get gingivitus/periodontis without the stimulation of brushing/flossing.

      Here is a pretty good website that explains/backs-up most of what I said. I found it to read up on wisdom teeth extraction a while back:

      http://www.doctorspiller.com/

    5. Re:Ridiculous by gardyloo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but what about those of us who want to live for more then 20 years?

            Eat lots of other animals. For the best results, eat those who've only eaten lots of sweet fruits. Mmm!

    6. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not really a lie, just a lack of more current information being spread. Even most dentists today will say its the suger. Some have kept on learning since dental school and know its not the suger but the bacteria feeding on the suger. Heredity plays a rols also, some people just have naturally good teeth and gums that stand up to almost anything. Different strains of bacteria play an even larger role. Recent studies show a "good" bacteria can fill the ecological nich preventing harmfull bacteria from having a place to live.

      I can't recall he article to link it, but I read about someone trying to get a patent for a modified bacteria to be sold just for this purpose.

    7. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They live for 20 years and their teeth are fine.

      Don't you mean "There are many primates that subsist almost exclusively on fruit that has substantial amounts of sugar. For some reason, they only live for 20 years."

    8. Re:Ridiculous by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      There are many primates that subsist almost exclusively on fruit that has substantial amounts of sugar. They live for 20 years and their teeth are fine.

      #1: They only live for 20 years.

      #2: There's a difference between fructose, cane sugar, and refined sugar. Kind of like there's a difference between coffee, coca leaves, and cocaine.

      It's really not as complex as you'd like to think. Refined sugar is a plant-eater's crack cocaine, and we love to put it in everything.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    9. Re:Ridiculous by midnighttoadstool · · Score: 1
      There are many primates that subsist almost exclusively on fruit that has substantial amounts of sugar. They live for 20 years and their teeth are fine. The problem of tooth decay is complex, but this oft repeated lie doesn't get to the bottom of it.

      I've been led to understand that the authorities on the subject, whoever they are (I can't remember any longer), are of the opinion that modern fruits have been generally bred for largness and sweetness. I read, a while ago, that its unknown whether any natural fruit actually exists (ie fruit that hasn't been manipulated by human sweet-cravings). Apples, Oranges, Bananas, Paw Paws: they are all unnatural. Those primates, I suspect, eat fruit that is less manipulated, quite possibly barely even sweet. Further vegetarian animals sometimes have teeth that keep growing, or even get replaced. If one considers that these creatures are adapated to fruit then it would seem quite likely that they would also be adapated to the the bacterial consequences, and so might not suffer as we do.

      So that oft-repeated lie is not neccessarily a lie for the reasons you gave, if alie at all.

      In humans the fact that fructose has to be processed by the liver, accelerates ageing like nothing else (not even cigarettes, AFAIK) and drains us of minerals (so hard is it for the body to process the stuff) seems to indicate that our ancient vestigial vegetarian features are no longer capable, just as with the appendix. Fruit eating primates may well do well by their diet, but that doesn't mean we do. [The fact of human sweet-craving does not mean that we are supposed to eat modern fruit, rather its possibly an advantage as a preparation for winter in ancient times, when fruit was seasonal and less sweet]

      So all in all: I think you are comparing apples to oranges.

    10. Re:Ridiculous by enux · · Score: 1

      well i guess the bare is smarter then the avrage human. You see on cartoons bears stealing honey from bees all the time but never see them at the dentists office. Do bears even know what a cavity is. Humans do. I guess we are smarter after all!

    11. Re:Ridiculous by mattstorer · · Score: 1

      They live for 20 years and their teeth are fine.

      People live for a lot longer than 20 years. Do you want your teeth to fall out by the time you're 25? Personally, I'd like to keep mine for as long as I live, and given today's averages in the US, that should be 80ish years.

  38. Hi, Dr. Nick! by rhizome · · Score: 1

    "The only way to stop it is through transdental electromicide. I'll need a golf cart motor and a thousand volt capacitator, stat."

    --
    When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  39. a variant on cathodic protection by twilight30 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the first things I learned while working at a solar power firm was the concept or use of anti-corrosion techniques, which just sounded amazing to me at the time. Essentially you can protect metal from oxidising by putting a residual electrical charge over it -- which you can get directly from a working solar panel during the day. Night-time hours would be powered by a battery that you would charge with the excess electricity from the panel accumulated during the day.

    I'm oversimplifying it massively here, but cathodic protection is a priority application for solar panels and equipment in remote areas, such as pipeline and radio-transmitter installations in the high Arctic.

    This treatment sounds like a weird and cool transferral of the idea to teeth.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
    1. Re:a variant on cathodic protection by arakon · · Score: 1

      Actually its used in most government conrolled facilities with undergroud piping as well. Speaking as someone who doesn't work in the arctic and maintains a network of pipes that run underround. Running a micro-charge hrough a pipe is a lot cheaper tan havig to dig the thing up and replace when it breaks. Especially if said pipe is carrying somehingnot so friendly to the environment.

      --
      "If I were bound by all laws everywhere I'm sure I would have committed a capital crime somewhere."
    2. Re:a variant on cathodic protection by uab21 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unsubstantiated story, but when I was an intern at NASA, I heard the story that this method was used to prevent corrosion in some underground tanks containing pressurized cryogenics for use in blow-down wind tunnels at NASA Ames. The current was incorrectly applied, and it accelerated, the corrosion, rather than delaying it, and when the tanks failed there was spectacularly bubbling and heaving mud over the tank location for several days. Wish I could have seen that

    3. Re:a variant on cathodic protection by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      It's been used on metal-hulled oceangoing vessels for a long time.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:a variant on cathodic protection by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Using continuity, you could also check to see if the pipe has been broken, such as with the plethora of 'dig-ups' these days.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  40. yep, let's solve another non-problem by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    Tooth decay has gone waay down since the introduction of Flouride toothpaste and fluoride washes. That's why dentists have had to expand into the profitable areas of tooth straightening, whitening and laminating. Now this new thingy may be of benefit, but it might be more economical and more just to put the money into public education about dental health and some into giving the poor more dental checkups.

    1. Re:yep, let's solve another non-problem by Urox · · Score: 1

      Canadian studies show tooth decay only goes down with fluoridated water in areas with higher poverty rates and higher lack of dental hygeine. Better off suburban areas with better dental hygeine, it makes no difference.

      Sorry, having troublefinding the relevant link. However, I will provide this that makes some claims about decay going down despite fluoridation.

      --
      "Would you rather have a playstation addicted dork wearing a star wars t-shirt?"
  41. Re:Cool to see the Palestinian/Israeli cooperation by pclminion · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Not all the tea in China is Chinese... What's your point?

    My point is that the assumption that an Arab in the state of Israel is necessarily Palestinian is a sign of ignorance.

    Care to say why?

    Because Palestinians and Israelis are not traditionally cooperative with each other. Whereas there are many non-Palestinian Arabs living in Israeli cities. Travel for Palestinians within Israel, as you should know, is difficult. Statistically, it's likely that the two Arab members of the project are not Palestinian. Sorry if this is not politically correct enough for you.

    I've been there and seen the reality myself. You?

  42. Re:Cool to see the Palestinian/Israeli cooperation by Ossifer · · Score: 1
    My point is that the assumption that an Arab in the state of Israel is necessarily Palestinian is a sign of ignorance.
    No, your point is a sign of Zionist nomenclature. Just because Zionists call Palestinians who were never ethnically cleansed as "Israeli Arabs" doesn't make them any less Palestinian. Note that this is of current Zionist usage. Previously Zionists claimed no Palestinians existed, and prior to that, that Jews native to Palestine were the only Palestinians.
    I've been there and seen the reality myself. You?
    Yes, I have! Hah!
  43. blah by aznedy · · Score: 1

    Most US dentists won't offer this treatment, they simply lose out on too much business. It is doubtful it would even get an ADA seal.

  44. Nice checkup... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    Nice checkup, kid!
    Here, have a candy!

    (Herman, Jim Unger)

  45. Cool idea. by jefp · · Score: 1

    I bet you could get the same effect by applying a current while brushing your teeth with regular fluoride toothpaste. Maybe Gillette will come out with a toothbrush that has a battery in the handle. Ground return via your hand. Better make sure to use the correct polarity though!

  46. Re:Believe it or not by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're wrong, chap, but you're also right. Eating less sugary foods saves the day. But your reasoning was wrong. Our tooth enamel becomes soluble at any pH more acidic than about 4.5. When our tooth enamel dissolves, we set ourselves up to get holes all the way through the enamel. As I understand it, our bodies have no way of replacing enamel once its gone. And enamel is what keeps our teeth from getting infected. Our poor gums are sensitive too, though, as you noted. But there's more.

    So the thing to do is keep our moth more basic than 4.5 (normal is about 5, I think). But the sugars that you noted get digested by the bacteria in our mouth, and then the biproduct of the digestion is lactic acid. This increases the acidity in out mouth (or decreases the pH). If you brush well enough that you have no bacteria in there, then you can eat all the sugar you want to no detriment. But most people have some bacteria in there, so we need to brush it out. But there's even more.

    Toothpaste is designed not only to be all bubbly and tasty, but to make our mouth more basic (raise the pH) as well. That's why there is sodium flouride in toothpaste. The flouride ion attaches to the free hydrogen ions that are making our saliva acidic. But keeping our mouths alkaline still can't save our enamel that's already gone. It sounds to me like this new technology maybe kind of can though...

  47. Just what the dentist ordered by novus+ordo · · Score: 1

    a zap to stimulate your love life...oh wait this is /.

    --
    "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
  48. Precious bodily fluids by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

    Why do they want to electrocute my precious bodily fluids?

  49. British teeth by caluml · · Score: 1

    $REALLY_OLD_LAME_JOKE_ABOUT_BRITISH_TEETH

    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  50. Erica Campbell Writes?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys are seriously missing the big picture here...HELLO, ERICA CAMPBELL!!

    http://www.ericacampbell.com/ :D

    1. Re:Erica Campbell Writes?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow...you know...there are these things out there...called women, you guys should seriously go outside once and a while...seriously + (condescending Eric Cartman Voice)

  51. Warning! by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    In my opinion, IsraCast is a marketing firm for what have often turned out to be dishonest schemes to take investor money. BE CAREFUL!

    Note that the IsraCast press release says, "The company is currently working on a small device..."

  52. Actually, many studies have shown that by Rooked_One · · Score: 1
    simply brushing your teeth with a flouridated toothpaste is more than enough. In one study, the amount of tooth decay among those with flouridated toothpaste AND flouridated tap water was only 2% less than those with only flouridated toothpaste.

    And flouride is a poison anyways, so any change is a good change if you ask me.

    1. Re:Actually, many studies have shown that by bani · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the dose makes the poison. how much fluoride do you think there is in tap water anyway? now compare that to the chlorine in tap water which is far more toxic. lest one forget, chlorine was used in WWI as a weapon.

    2. Re:Actually, many studies have shown that by Achromus · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Fluorine applied to the tooth enamel (topically) causes a chemical reaction that makes the enamel more resistant to acid, which is a good thing. Fluorine when ingested (systemically), such as in drinking water, causes chemical reactions throughout the body and is a damn stupid thing to do. http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/teeth/caries/t opical-systemic.html

  53. Too many chemicals by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Are you talking about Hydric Acid, a highly corrosive industrial solvent? Accidental respiration of which "is the second leading cause of accidental death, averaging approximately 8000 deaths per year in the United States alone."

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:Too many chemicals by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      That's the stuff. And be careful; as a gas, it can melt the flesh right off of you, causing horrific burns, and solid DHMO causes massive cellular damage, often with only minutes of direct exposure.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  54. The press release says, "working on". by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    DANGER!! IsraCast is known, in my opinion, for selling ideas to investors that have little likelihood of making money.

    1. Re:The press release says, "working on". by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      You're probably right. This idea smacks of anodizing, where a piece of aluminum has electric current put through it inside a bath of sulfuric acid, creating an extremely strong coat of alumininum hydroxide (4th highest known compound on the hardness scale, below only diamond, titanium dioxide, and 1 other).

      However:
      1 - Teeth are not made of aluminum.
      2 - The amounts of H2SO4 and electricity needed would likely be fatal.
      3 - Our teeth are already very rich in hydroxides.
      4 - Hydroxides are plenty strong enough. Cement is a hydroxide fairly similar to tooth.

    2. Re:The press release says, "working on". by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

      Heh, surely better than selling real products to consumers that have little likelihood of making money.

      At least investors have more money, think they're smarter and move in herds (so you don't need mass media advertising). Sounds good to me! Milk 'em dry!

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
  55. hmmm by amazon10x · · Score: 1

    Last week I stuck my finger in a light bulb socket... now that I think about it; my teeth do seem pretty darn white!

  56. You do not know how the government works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think government is about serving citizens? To get the ear of a senator or congressmen as a citizen is not likely, but for a corporation with a large donation made to a politician's campaign the story is different and that "donation" is gonna buy some clout and lobbying power.

  57. Study by msbsod · · Score: 1

    Effect of fluoridation of water on teeth, study
    Tooth decay declined substantially in prevalence and severity when Hong Kong children consumed less fluoride ...

    1. Re:Study by geekoid · · Score: 1

      haha, did you see the references?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Study by msbsod · · Score: 1

      Yup, and the references quoted in the reference.

    3. Re:Study by milletre · · Score: 1

      Tooth decay declined substantially in prevalence and severity when Hong Kong children consumed less fluoride ...

      Most of the references seem to indicate that there was also a vigorous public health campaign (through schools or other venues) to increase the amount of topical fluoride the teeth were exposed to, through education about brushing, rinsing programs, etc. I would caution anyone reading this not to think "fluoride is bad." The jury is about about systemic (swallowed) fluoride, I agree, but fluoride applied to the surface of the teeth is universally considered good by all rational scientists, as far as I can see.

      Another interesting side note is that it is becoming harder to track where people get fluoride in their diet. A couple of the studies cited were conducted in more modern times, where people eat less locally-grown and prepared foods, and people drink massively more bottled products shipped in from who-knows-where than we did 50 years ago. The place your can of Coke was manufactured may use fluoridated water, the designer water you drink might come from a municipal water supply that's fluoridated. Your individual town's water fluoridation program has less impact on you if you use a lot of these products; i.e., you may be getting more or less fluoride than you think you are.

  58. Sugar in the Raw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else use Sugar in the Raw? It is suppossed to be healthier than the bleached and processed white table sugar that has its molasses content removed. This more natural sugar tastes pretty good too, I have no idea why the processed sugar is so prevalent.

  59. sounds crazy by digitallysick · · Score: 0

    but i guess they know what they are doing? you wouldnt think electricty could do anything as far as teeth go

  60. Taser to the face, booya by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    No man, its cool. I'm saving you on dental bills.

  61. Re:Cool to see the Palestinian/Israeli cooperation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course no "Palestinians" really exist, they're just pretending being a separate nation. It's just a clever trick to get international support for killing Jews and establishing a terrorist state.

    They admit it themself. Zuheir Muhsin, of the PLO's Military Department and Executive Council said in 1977:

    "There are no differences between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. We are all part of one nation. It is only for political reasons that we carefully underline our Palestinian identity, because it is in the interest of the Arabs to encourage a separate Palestinian identity. Yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity serves only tactical purposes. The founding of a Palestinian state is a new tool in the continuing battle against Israel."

  62. Dr. Nick pioneered this by mr_burns · · Score: 1
    transdental electromicide (from http://www.snpp.com/episodes/3F18.html):

    Abe's only hope is "transdental electromicide". Dr. Riviera asks for a golf cart motor with a 1000 volt capacimator, but the two-second hesitation pushes him past schedule. Nick improvises by ripping the cords from an operating lamp and shocking the sh-- hell out of Abe. "Keep doing that every five seconds", the "doctor" instructs. The malpractice charges are dropped, and Dr. Nick enthuses "Free nose jobs for everyone!" starting with Jasper, who wants a Van Heflin.

    Sure, this was to treat Skin Failure but the ancilliary benefits are just starting to come to light.

    --
    "Let him go, Ralph. He knows what he's doing." --Otto Mann (simpsons)
  63. I, for one,.... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our new fluor-ion elctro-plated toothed overlords! That's right, I have no shame.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  64. I, for one,.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

    welcome are new shameless overlords!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  65. Those poor dentists... by Aelcyx · · Score: 1

    Now dentists like Louie Rocco of the Bronx cannot treat customers who come into his office suffering from tooth decay after a long day of driving cabs. At least he won't be punching anyone in the teeth and no one will wake up from sedation with pants mysteriously unbuttoned.

  66. This is how it's meant to work... by tbird81 · · Score: 5, Informative
    The enamel on our teeth consists of hydroxyapatite. This is a very strong substance, both in terms of low solubility and physical strength.

    As any chemistry geek knows a fluorine ion (F-) can replace a hydroxyl ion (OH-). In teeth, fluoride causes formation of hydroxyfluoroapatite, where some of the OH's have been replaced with F's.

    The compound with the fluoride is slightly stronger physically, it also has better pK values. The pKa and other values tell us about the solubility of a compound in acids or bases. Fluoroapatite is less soluble in acid. This means cavities will not form as easily when bacterial start producing acid in the teeth.

    Normally, fluoride gets into our teeth through diffusion. Fluoride is in reasonably high concentrations in saliva anyway, but topical application of fluoride (for instance brushing your teeth) will increase the amount of strong fluoroapatite in your enamel.

    This method uses a current to influence the exchange of OH for F in tooth enamel. It is nearly similar to the copper plating experiments you may have seen in high school.

    Fluoride is only bad if ingested in large quanties. Fluorosis, a discoluration of the teeth, is caused by problems with the enamel producing cells in childhood. It can happen if children habitually eat toothpaste. It will not happen with topical application.

    Skeletal bones can be adversely affected by fluoride, but this also requires high internal F- levels. It is unlikely to happen with topical application of toothpaste.

    1. Re:This is how it's meant to work... by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      Ksp hydroxyapatite=2.34x10-59
      Ksp fluorapatite =3.16x10-60

    2. Re:This is how it's meant to work... by FST · · Score: 1

      Wow. You are interesting. Tell us more!

      --
      46487 466780 252994 376409 96920 39622 205366 244315 622115 512361 668040 63608 259203 955314 811176 652718 166330 23922
    3. Re:This is how it's meant to work... by bani · · Score: 1

      there are a few studies which have shown a correlation between fluoridated water and a reduced risk of bone fractures in the elderly. so it appears fluoridated water can help strenghten bones.

    4. Re:This is how it's meant to work... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I realise you said "appears" but I just want to point out that you know it isn't just that they don't have to fool around with dentures all the time (extra walking and chance for a fall), or a billion other things.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    5. Re:This is how it's meant to work... by Deffexor · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are new toothpastes that are now arriving on the market that are designed to "remineralize" the enamel and restore small-to-tiny dental decay. Some people may remember "Enamelon" (which went out of business). Well, it seems that there are 3 products that are not likely to go out of business any time soon, but use essentially the same technology.

      Teeth (like bones) breakdown and rebuild every day. Bones via the bloodstream. Teeth via saliva and enzymes and minerals found in the saliva. Fluoride definitely helps strengthen teeth against acid attack and helps attract calcium and phosphate to the enamel. These new toothpastes sound like they work pretty much the same: They make calcium and phosphate ions more bio-available (sounds like marketing, I know) such that they increase the strength of the enamel. Current research indicates that used daily over a few months has a dramatic impact on enamel remineralization.

      The current toothpaste and technologies are:

      Prospec MI Paste (Recaldent)

      Oravive (Novamin)

      Arm & Hammer Liquid Calcium (???)

      The Arm & Hammer you can buy in stores now. The Oravive can be ordered from the company website. The Prospec MI Paste must be obtained from your dentist or thru a dental supplier which is kind of surprising because it is apparently so safe that you can swallow it without worry. (Oddly, it is supposed to be applied after you brush your teeth.) Recaldent can also be found in Trident White chewing gum.

      Lastly, Xylitol (a 5-carbon sugar alcohol) has been shown to have a positive impact on the reduction of bad bacteria in the mouth. Some new chewing gums are being flavor with Xylitol just for this reason. Though I can't figure out why Trident White (with their teeth strengthening Recaldent) isn't flavored with Xylitol. They had a line of chewing gum called "Trident for Kids" which had both, but they've since discontinued it. Maybe it works too well... O_o ???

    6. Re:This is how it's meant to work... by oasisbob · · Score: 1
      As any chemistry geek knows a fluorine ion (F-) can replace a hydroxyl ion (OH-). In teeth, fluoride causes formation of hydroxyfluoroapatite, where some of the OH's have been replaced with F's.

      Any chemistry geek knows that the F- is the fluoride ion, not the fluorine ion. Similarly, there is no such thing as a hydroxyl ion. Hydroxide is the ion which carries a charge. Hydroxyl refers to an organic functional group.
  67. 5 years? by msbsod · · Score: 1

    5 years of protection, according to FLUORINEX ACTIVE LTD.? That must have been pretty short years.

    http://www.matimop.org.il/newrdinf/company/c6167.h tm
    FLUORINEX ACTIVE LTD. was established on April 2004 and currently
    is conducting a comprehensive in-vitro research in cooperation
    with the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. The research goal is to
    optimize the parameters of the treatment and to prove its
    efficacy on a solid statistical basis.


    What a "solid" statistical basis that must be.

  68. Even better by EZLeeAmused · · Score: 1, Funny

    If they would make a device that gave you an electric shock every time you reached for a candy bar, it would help prevent tooth decay AND obesity.

    --
    Some see the vessel as half full; others see it as half-empty; We pour it out on the floor and laugh
    1. Re:Even better by aug24 · · Score: 1

      ...and provide some much needed amusement in this jaded age.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  69. Miracle bacteria by alohatiger · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to the genetically engineered bacteria that A) displaced the natural bacteria in your mouth and B) didn't produce acid?

    I read about this a few years ago (I think) and this was supposed to eliminate tooth decay with just one treatment. They were even into human testing...

    --
    Bigtime Consulting - "We're the best because we cost the most"
    1. Re:Miracle bacteria by msbsod · · Score: 2, Funny

      The genetically engineered miracle bacteria ate all test persons.

  70. Gravy for the brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You know what they put in the water, don't you? Fluoride. Yeah, fluoride -- on the pretext that it strengthems your teeth! That's ridiculous. You know what that stuff does to you? It weakens your will, destroys your capacity for free and creative thought, and makes you a slave to the state!"
    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Conspiracy_Theory

    1. Re:Gravy for the brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, don't drink the water then...

  71. Dr. Strangelove or How I Learned To Stop Worrying by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ripper: Have you ever seen a commie drink a glass of water?

    Mandrake: Well, no I... I can't say I have, Jack.

    Ripper: Vodka. That's what they drink, isn't it? Never water?

    Mandrake: Well I... I believe that's what they drink, Jack. Yes.

    Ripper: On no account will a commie ever drink water, and not without good reason.

    Mandrake: Oh, ah, yes. I don't quite.. see what you're getting at, Jack.

    Ripper: Water. That's what I'm getting at. Water. Mandrake, water is the source of all life. Seven tenths of this earth's surface is water. Why, you realize that.. seventy percent of you is water.

    Mandrake: Uhhh God...

    Ripper: And as human beings, you and I need fresh, pure water to replenish our precious bodily fluids.

    Mandrake: Yes. chuckles nervously

    Ripper: You beginning to understand?

    Mandrake: Yes. chuckles. begins laughing/crying quietly

    Ripper: Mandrake. Mandrake, have you never wondered why I drink only distilled water, or rain water, and only pure grain alcohol?

    Mandrake: Well it did occur to me, Jack, yes.

    Ripper: Have you ever heard of a thing called fluoridation? Fluoridation of water?

    Mandrake: Ah, yes, I have heard of that, Jack. Yes.

    Ripper: Well do you now what it is?

    Mandrake: No. No, I don't know what it is. No.

    Ripper: Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face?

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  72. Soft Drinks are TOXIC POISON in a Pretty Can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read an artile a few years back (clipped it and saved it somewhere, have to dig it out).... of a scientist that developed a bacteria that could be swabbed on your teeth one time, and would displace the bateria in your mouth that give off acid as a byproduct (and thereby causing tooth decay).

    It was still awaiting FDA approval, because apparently I guess the 'treatment' could be passed by simply kissing another person or exchanging saliva that contained the mouth friendlier bacteria.

    I thought, this will never be allowed out, it would put a huge industry of dentists out of business. Dentists know how evil softdrinks and sugar are, and yet they do nothing to fight it (perhaps they can't).

    But I thought, I sure want this treatment and be ahead of the curve.

    My detist told me at 35 I had the teeth of an 80 year old, and I brush several times a day and floss as well. The culprit? Soft drinks. A lifetime addiction to softdrinks. Which also led to me becoming terribly hypoglycemic.

    There is nothing soft about softdrinks, or other drinks containing sugar and caffeine. Your teeth are porreous like a sponge. You drink a softdrink and all that gets into the poors and the bacteria grows, and their acid waste products start eating away at your teeth. You can brush and brush all you want, all you are doing is brushing the outside of the sponge so to speak.

    Do yourself a favor, never touch a softdrink again. They are pure rot.

    Instead, eat fresh vegtables, some protein with every meal, and complex carbohydrates like wholewheat pasta (like spagetti, but the brown variety... I saw it in Walmart yesterday for the first time).

  73. Cavities have already been cured... by transami · · Score: 1

    But organizations like the ADA make sure they don't get very far.

    --
    :T:R:A:N:S:
  74. Re:Believe it or not by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you think anyone is going to listen to a Wonka regarding tooth decay?

  75. Too complicated by AlterTick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bizarre devices that add hardened layers to teeth seems like the wrong way to go. I want to know when the FDA is going to approve the modified streptococcus mutans bacteria they developed at U of Florida. Strep M lives in your mouth naturally. When it eats sugar, it excretes lactic acid. The lactic acid is what rots your teeth. The Strep M they made at UofF has been "fixed" so that it doesn't produce lactic acid. The way you use it is simple. They innoculate your mouth with the new Strep M and instruct you to eat lots of sugar. The new Strep M quickly displaces the natural Strep M. So far, tests show that the natural, damaging Strep M doesn't come back. No electricity, no gel; the major source of tooth decay is simply eliminated. More here

    --
    Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
  76. Steps to Success... by MikeTheMan · · Score: 1

    1. Hook car battery up to teeth.
    2. Hit the ON button.
    3. ????
    4. PROFIT!!!

    1. Re:Steps to Success... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case, step 3 can be stated as "Swear and scream loudly".

  77. Does testing 9v batteries on your tongue help? by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Jes' wondering.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  78. Some of us actually need this by ewe2 · · Score: 1

    For those like me who through illness have had practically no enamel on their teeth and have had to have numerous fluoride treatments which have a limited success rate, this treatment could be the difference between keeping my existing teeth or no teeth at all within a decade.

    I only wish it was available 5 years ago before I had to lose 6 teeth. I only wish I had perfect sparklies so I wasn't so self-conscious.

    --
    insecurity asks the wrong question irritation gives the wrong answer
  79. But... by bondjamesbond · · Score: 1

    will it take care of your STANK BREFF??

  80. Re:Believe it or not by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

    Depends. If his teeth are still good, he may really be onto something!

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  81. In other news: British invade Israel by DanTheLewis · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Fighting the global war against tooth decay is in the vital national interest of Great Britain," said Tony Blair, Prime Minister of the UK, as he announced the march of infantry on Nazareth, home of Fluorinex. "We're sure Jesus can spare a few chapels. We will stop at nothing to honor his sacrifice -- with our glistening white smiles, if necessary."

    Reaction from the United States was guarded. In an apparent reference to the incident, President Bush repeatedly mumbled to himself, "Lisa needs braces? Dental plan?" while speaking to reporters today on the subject.

    Asked if the United States would be taking up the British invasion at the UN Security Council, Bush said he always liked the Monkees better than the Beatles anyway.

    --

    Q: What did the comedian say to the crowd?
    A: If I knew, this joke would be funny.
  82. Re:Believe it or not by aaza · · Score: 1

    Well, if that Wonka was Dr Wonka from the 2005 movie, I'd be scared not too!

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
    In practice, however, there is.
  83. Ask your Dentists about Polymer coating for teeth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To keep Perfect teeth,
    you can get each surface of each tooth polymer coated with a
    nice hard plastic film.

    Bacteria, Acid, Black Coffee, basically
    nothing can harm the coating on the teeth.

    Often coated teeth will never get a single cavity.

    Typical coatings cost $60~$80 a surface, with 5 surfaces or more
    on a tooth.

    But it is worth it to get for yourself and your kids,
    so you never have to face the dentists drill.

    Most Dentists don't promote it,
    oddly enough - many dental plans wont pay for the expensive
    preventitive treatment, but they'll pay for them to drill holes in your head!

  84. Ha! by Ponzicar · · Score: 1

    And my mother said that chewing on batteries was bad for my health!

  85. Fight Tooth Decay with Cranberries by cciRRus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I prefer to eat cranberries than going through any form of electrical treatment.

    Mmmmm.... cranberries....

    --
    w00t
  86. My Reaction: by FFFish · · Score: 1

    D-oh! Why on earth didn't someone think of this decades ago? This is basically the same process used in industry all over the place, from electroplating to automotive paint application. It's so obvious now that someone has done it!

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  87. well you asked for it by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    Unless you reeeeally think the Gubamint is out to get us, I would definitely trust the cdc.gov and the nih.gov over, um, "fluoridealert.org".

    Do you happen to live in Ithaca, NY by any chance? That's the only place I've ever lived (I went to Cornell) who didn't fluoridate the water.

    I will not go into the years of dental work I've had to have done to repair the damage from just those 4 years (although admittedly, living in a fraternity and often crashing without brushing probably exacerbated it). I have 2 caps, multiple fillings and just... I had to spend a lot of money, put it that way. My oral hygiene habits didn't change THAT much from pre-Cornell, yet I got almost all my cavities there. Oh, yes, don't even get me started on the between-the-teeth cavities. Those were the best. (I floss like a motherf***er now)

    I'll take the goddamn fluoride, thanks.

  88. No it is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fruits contain glucose and fructose which are simple natural sugars that are healthy. What causes big time dental problem is the modern processed white table sugar(brown sugar also), that is refined and not natural but are stripped of all nutritional content and act as weak posions.

  89. Resulting Hassidic environment in the mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't trust anything developed in israel. Remember PROMIS.

  90. Re:Believe it or not by eluusive · · Score: 1

    And if your saliva is alkali, the calcium in your saliva will redeposit onto your teeth. Your teeth enamel are constantly being dissolved and replaced via this process. Google for CaviStat for a product based on this.

  91. Re:Believe it or not by RandomCoil · · Score: 1
    Toothpaste is designed not only to be all bubbly and tasty, but to make our mouth more basic (raise the pH) as well. That's why there is sodium flouride in toothpaste. The flouride ion attaches to the free hydrogen ions that are making our saliva acidic.

    Hydrofluoric acid (HF) is a strong acid whose conjugate base is the fluoride ion (F-). In toothpaste, it is generally added as the soluble sodium salt (NaF). The pKa of HF is ~3.2. Unless your saliva pH is lower than 3.2, addition of F- won't help. The pH of toothpaste is, to my knowledge, above 7, meaning it is slightly basic and capable of countering the acidic environment produced by bacteria. However, it's not the fluoride ion that's responsible for this.
  92. Re:Believe it or not by bmgoau · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sometimes i get the feeling that the collective knowlege of slashdot could solve any problem, and adapt to any task.

    Now, if we could only learn to get along...

  93. Re:Believe it or not by milletre · · Score: 1
    That's why there is sodium flouride in toothpaste. The flouride ion attaches to the free hydrogen ions that are making our saliva acidic.

    Not really. It's so that the fluoride gets incorporated into the inorganic matrix of the enamel, replacing calcium ions, so that the matrix turns from hydroxyapatite to fluoroapatite, which dissolves at a much lower pH.

    No matter what, your mouth will undergo an excursion into low pH after every single event during which you take in calories, be that a meal, a snack, a single grape, whatever. An interesting side note is that people with lots of cavities will actually see their pH drop lower from the same amount of sugar than someone with no cavities.

    I forget from school, but I think the pH at which you start pulling out calcium is somewhere around 5.5.

    You will *never* brush well enough that you have no bacteria. It's not a reasonable goal. The proper goal is to limit access to fermentable carbohydrates throughout the day (that's how the lactic acid gets produced), and hopefully tip the bacterial balance in your mouth away from cavity-causing and/or perodontitis-causing species.

  94. Re:Believe it or not by milletre · · Score: 1

    Oops. It's hydroxide getting replaced, not calcium.

  95. Re:Cool to see the Palestinian/Israeli cooperation by kotku · · Score: 1

    The problem is that there were NO states in the middle east earlier this century. The quote above has some truth. When the European powers pulled out of the middle east they drew arbitrary borders and gave control of those borders to tribes or sects or warlords in a somewhat arbitrary way. The states as drawn in the Middle East do not really reflect the ethnicity or culture of the people who live within. Inevitably the strongest group within each country rises to power and persecutes the minority.

    Israel is just one of all the states in the Middle East that had arbitrary borders drawn by the European powers at the end of the war. The only reason the Israeli/Palestinian conflict gets so much press is that Arab governments have long used Israel as "the enemy" as a political tool. There is much rhetoric and little real care for the suffering of the Palestinian people. There is more interest in humiliating Israel than alleviating the suffering of the people. If the conflict in Israel evaporated tomorrow and an equitable solution was found most Arab goverment would be very unhappy. Then the brutalities that these governments perpetuate on thier own people equalling and exceeding those that the Israeli army hands out will become the focus of the peoples anger.

    Take for example Iran, long a champion of the Palestinian people. It holds big rallies, funds Hamas and takes every opportunity to denounce the evil Zionist empire. However, the Iranian regime fervently persecutes it's own religious minorites. The Bahai's for instance are one of the most peacefull and sensible religious groups I have come across and yet in Iran they are refugees in thier own country, unable to get jobs or practise thier religion for fear of the wrath of the government, yet the Bahai's have never once advocated rebellion or war or raised a weapon against the Iranian government. In fact part of their doctrine states that they must always act in accordance with the laws of the land in which they reside. I can't agree or disagree with this but it leads to a bunch of peacefull people who are nothing to be scared of yet the Iranians stamp on them very hard.

    This however doesn't justify Israeli army actions against civilians in the West Bank or Gaza, the collective punishments, and the roadblock strip/search humilations that occur. Still the conflict should be seen in light of the history of the area and that there is no simple one line bit of rhetoric that will justify or condemn one group or another. In the end they all live on one bit of land and will have to figure out how to live together.

    K

    --
    The bikini - security through obscurity since 1943
  96. Re:You're probably right. by retrosteve · · Score: 1


    Previous poster 100 years ago:

    You're probably right. The Wright Brothers' idea smacks of human flight, which we all know is impossible because:

    1- Humans do not have feathers
    2- Humans' bones are not hollow and therefore are too heavy for flight
    3- Imitating the motion of bird's wings is mechanically very complex and requires heavy machinery which is itself too heavy to fly
    4- Hot air balloons and zeppelins work just fine anyway.

    Moral: Comparing a technology to another similar one doesn't add any useful information.

  97. Re:You're probably right. by mrogers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Whereas comparing an analogy to another similar one is valid?

  98. I usually sell good marketing tips by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    This one is free: Announce that you must not eat broccoli and spinach when doing this, and kids will swarm you to get one!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  99. Wrong about fluoride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well a floride coating is what natrually protects our teeth, thats why tap water, and toothpaste have this as an additive. Actually I just read that tooth decay is on the rise because many of us no longer drink tap water wwhich is forified with floride

    Like many Americans my age, I grew up with a positive association to fluoride. Toothpaste commercials told me that fluoride helped prevent tooth decay and that I should brush my teeth with fluoride toothpaste, so I used it every day. The dentist gave me fluoride treatments for my teeth. Fluoride was also added to municipal water supplies, so drinking tap water (and anything made with it) gave me a daily dose of fluoride too. Like most other people, I assumed it must be healthy. Otherwise, why would people add it to toothpaste and water?

    Fluoride is not added to the tap water to protect our teeth.

    Firstly, the American Dental Association states that all ground and surface water in the United States contains some naturally occurring fluoride. There is no such thing as "fluoride-deficient" water. Furthermore, only calcium fluoride occurs naturally in water, and it has never been used for fluoridation. The chemicals used to fluoridate 90% of public drinking water are industrial grade hazardous wastes captured in the air pollution-control scrubber systems of the phosphate fertilizer industry, called silicofluorides. The most commonly used one is Hydrofluosilicic acid.
    http://www.fluoridedebate.com/

    The fluoride used for water fluoridation is considered by the FDA as an "unapproved drug". Research shows fluoridation is unnecessary since we're already receiving 300% or more of the American Dental Association's recommended daily amount.
    http://www.nofluoride.com/

    The FDA does not regulate tap water. The EPA does. Despite official government policy, the union of 1500 scientists, lawyers, engineers and other professional employees at the EPA opposes water fluoridation.
    http://www.fluoridealert.org/hp-epa.htm

    As you probably already know, the fluoride used in tap water is a neurotoxin including cadium and mercury.
    http://www.prn2.usm.my/mainsite/bulletin/nst/2001/ nst34.html

    Fluoridated water has caused cancer in children. The increased cancer risks, identified in a newly available study conducted at the Harvard School of Dental Health, were found at fluoride exposure levels common in both the US and Britain.
    http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,690 3,1504672,00.html

    Fluoridated water disrupts DNA enzyme repair. Fluoride affects fertility rates.
    http://www.drkaslow.com/html/fluoride.html

    The fluoride used in tap water causes genetic damage. One US Government report investigated 156 deaths over 3 years. They concluded that fluoride accumulates in body tissues and may eventually cause fatal illnesses.
    http://www.health-science.com/fluoride_toxicity.ht ml

    IF you stopped reading by now, your ADD is probably caused by water fluoridation. The fluoride used in tap water is linked to alzheimers, lower IQ rates in children, and dementia.
    http://www.fluoridation.com/brain.htm

    Japan, Germany, Sweden, Russia, Holland and Finland have all had mass fluoridation schemes and stopped them. France has never allowed it, and Belgium have gone a step further and banned the sale of fluoride tablets and chewing gum. Between 1990 and 2000, no less than 77 US and Canadian cities either rejected fluoridation or abandoned existing schemes, some after several deca

  100. Re: saving your teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think one of the problems with the flouride gel and other fluoride treatments is that they primarily affect the surface of the tooth. Decay is essentially a process of demineralization followed by structural failure (cavitation) when enough mineral substance has been lost.

    Your body can actually repair teeth, provided cavitation has not occured. When the tooth structure is first lost, there are pore created in the enamel surface. Later mineral loss comes from below the surface, creating. You've got a sort of void inside the tooth, with a thin smooth shell over the top of it. As long as this surface layer is not breached, you can remineralize the lesion.

    The reason, as you note is the critical pH of 4.5. Below this, mineral dissolves. Above this pH, mineral gets laid down. One of the problems with remineralization, however, is that the surfaces pores narrow and close during remineralization, making it hard to get new mineral into the body of the lesion. So, what you really need to fully repair the tooth is cycles of low and high pH. Ironically, plaque can aid in this as it can soak up some fluoride and release it over time.

    Anyway, if this technology can repair the subsurface of the tooth, that would be significant. I wonder how they can, though.

    random notes:
    You can never really get rid of the all the bacteria in the mouth. One hour after a professional cleaning, you've got new biofilm laid down. I think it's back to normal within hours/days. Fluoride doesn't just strengthen teeth, it inhibits glycolysis in some oral bacteria.

  101. Re:Believe it or not by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

    I used to think this as well. But then I thought about it a little harder--enamel can only come back out of solution when our saliva gets more basic if there is dissolved enamel in our saliva. Because we swallow and spit, and our body just naturally replaces our saliva constantly, there we lose the dissolved enamel. So then when saliva gets more basic again, there's no dissolved enamel around to redeposit on your teeth. Note also that our saliva isn't actually "alkaline," someone else was saying that the pH is 5.5 when our saliva starts dissolving our enamel. I think that sounds right (I was thinking it was 4.5 before). And looking around on google just now it appears that saliva can get above 7, but I get the feeling that for most people it is between 6 and 7. So not really "acidic" in the sense that this acid can kill anything (I hope that other guy's post got modded away), but not really "alkaline" either.

  102. Low Amperage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article claims, "6-9 volt, at low amperage." How do you keep a 9 volt separation across an acidic liquid? They can't forecefully control both. The mouth has very low resistance, so they'd have a high current if they put 9 volts across it. If they want low current, they drop the voltage. Ohm's law is hard to beat.

  103. Fluoride toxicity by J.R.+Random · · Score: 1

    While fluoride can protect teeth, it is also a poison when ingested. That is why you shouldn't eat toothpaste. So I question the wisdom of adding fluoride to the water supply.

  104. Re:You're probably right. by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

    And you know what, humans still cannot fly.

    Zeppelins and airplanes are non-human.

  105. Re:You're probably right. by retrosteve · · Score: 1

    And yet, the Wright Brothers' idea was commercially viable. The problem wasn't the arguments against human flight, which were, like your description of anodization, perfectly valid.

    The problem was your assumption that if they seemed similar, they had to suffer from the same challenges.

  106. Why is it taking so long to come to market? by cr0sh · · Score: 1

    I remember a device similar to this one (although, I think, without the special "paste" involved) that was developed in Australia, and shown on Beyond 2000, back in the mid/late 1980's. It was a device, custom fitted and molded like a retainer, with batteries and electronics in it to produce a current in your mouth while you slept at night to reduce/eliminate tooth decay from plaque. From the way it was presented on the program, it seemed like something which should have been, at most, five years to market (at least somewhere, if not in the United States). Yet it still has not been manufactured and marketed, not even to the dental services community. Every once in a while, we see another story like this pop up in the news. But we never, ever, seem to be able to purchase the product from our dentists! Personally, I don't think such a product could replace proper brushing or dental checkups and cleanings. However, such a product might make for healthier, stronger teeth for people throughout their lives, which can only be a good thing. So - what/who is blocking this technology from becoming widespread, and why?

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  107. more 'hippy fear' by juan2074 · · Score: 1
    There is more to health than just tooth care.

    I was responding to the original poster, who has diabetes and wants to slim down. In that case, I would especially avoid anything with high-fructose corn syrup.

    Processed foods with the fat and fibre removed alter our normal digestion. Our bodies are supposed to get fat and fibre through our diet. Cutting out fat will not necessarily force our bodies to burn body fat, and probably will lead to decreased absorption of certain vitamins and minerals. (There are always exceptions, but almost everyone will experience negative health effects from consuming processed foods.)

    Worse, processed foods with all the additives, preservatives, and other chemicals affect our immune systems and other body processes in various ways. (Why put those un-natural foods in your body in the first place?) And processed foods have Omega-3 essential fatty acids (EFAs) removed, which explains why the typical person in the US has an un-healthy ratio of Omega-6 to Omega-3 EFAs of over ten-to-one. (The ratio should be below two-to-one.)

    Many doctors and nutritionists tell diabetics to switch to fat-free and sugar-free foods, but diatetes actually gets worse for over 90 percent of those patients. Doctors have even told them to stop eating fruit (because of the sugars), but that is misguided -- as many diabetics have discovered.

    Similarly, dentists tell patients that artificial sweeteners like aspartame and sucralose will not cause dental caries, because they are not fermentable carbohydrates. All the scientific studies in the world can be bent to produce the desired results. If any dentist totally trusts those studies (from the makers of artificial sweeteners), let him/her consume a diet beverage or coat his/her teeth with the artificial sweetener before going to sleep. Would anyone have that much trust to keep that crap on the teeth all night? I certainly would not risk it. Perhaps you would.

    It's up to you what you put in your body. But if you only worry about dental care, you might neglect a lot more of your body. Your teeth (and gums) are only part of the total system. And you can brush, floss, and rinse to keep your teeth and gums clean and healthy.

  108. Chlorine also used at WTO ptoests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    chlorine was used in WWI as a weapon
    It was also used in Seattle during the WTO protests as crowd control.

    At least according to one of my law school members ... and she is in the top 5% of the class.

    I then walked away muttering "Fucking idiot" under my breath.