Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Find New Species In Remote New Guinea

An anonymous reader writes "A team of scientists exploring an isolated jungle in one of Indonesia's most remote provinces said they discovered dozens of new species of frogs, butterflies and plants as well as large mammals hunted to near extinction elsewhere. The team also found wildlife that were remarkably unafraid of humans during their rapid assessment survey of the Foja Mountains, which has more than two million acres of old growth tropical forest."

179 comments

  1. So tell us. by falzer · · Score: 5, Funny

    How do they taste?

    1. Re:So tell us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Surprisingly like chicken.

    2. Re:So tell us. by Three+Headed+Man · · Score: 2, Funny

      Save the endangered species! Collect the whole set!

      --
      I'm probably at the karma cap. Mod up a funny troll instead, it lightens the mood :)
    3. Re:So tell us. by erroneous · · Score: 2, Funny

      "seriously tasty" according to reports

      --
      erroneous: look me up in a dictionary
    4. Re:So tell us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lemme see... you must be Chinese!

  2. Consequences of Discovery by Iron+(III)+Chloride · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hopefully this might provide more public incentive in terms of supporting conservation efforts.

    --
    Cogito, ergo sum, fosho!
    1. Re:Consequences of Discovery by User+956 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hopefully this might provide more public incentive in terms of supporting conservation efforts.

      I think in the united states, conservatives have already done their share. Maybe we could get some liberalisation efforts?

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:Consequences of Discovery by EntropyEngine · · Score: 1

      As with almost all other things in this world, if you can provide a good, solid case for a business opportunity, big business will sit up and listen.

      Big pharmaceutical companies and cosmetic firms are now ploughing cash into protection and conservation programs because they've been shown huge potential in renewal resources of new plants and animals in places where the local people are deforesting large parts of their land for either the timber trade of agriculture.

      The global potential for renewable resources is truly massive, but it's a race to get this knowledge out there fast enough to derail the actions of the French and the British who're stripping the likes of Amazon rain forest of trees to build occasional tables, three-piece suites and fitted wardrobes / closets for the rest of us in the 'developed' world.

      Now if only we could make a good, sound business case for peace...

    3. Re:Consequences of Discovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, but next time, try to be even remotely funny.. cuz ya kinda bombed here..

      kthnx

  3. They found them !!! by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So anyone taking bets on how long it will take before these 'hunted to near extinction' mammals will really be extinct?

    1. Re:They found them !!! by User+956 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So anyone taking bets on how long it will take before these 'hunted to near extinction' mammals will really be extinct?

      That depends. Can you make fancy shoes out of them?

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:They found them !!! by st1d · · Score: 1

      How long does it take to translate this article to Japanese? ;)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    3. Re:They found them !!! by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Come on, we are not talking whales here.

      So the mere fact of publishing it in English will be more then enough.

      The species of bird of paradise which was thought to be extinct and is found there should easily fetch a 5 figure to 6 figure sum from some bird collectors. Same for the other stuff.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    4. Re:They found them !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That depends. Can you make fancy shoes out of them?
      No, but they go really well with white wine.
    5. Re:They found them !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Japanese only go for endangered sea life. It's the Chinese who really go for endangered land species. Seems their wise enlightened ancient natural medicine is unable to work without a constant supply of rhino horns, tiger glands, elephant tusks, and other tiny parts of animals that are teetering on the verge of extinction.

    6. Re:They found them !!! by hedleyroos · · Score: 1

      Please.

      Everyone knows it is illegal to hunt extinct animals.

  4. Re:Whoa by Ellidi+T · · Score: 0

    I just hope that this won't really attract tourists and such. It would be a shame.

    --
    Ellidi
  5. Uh-oh by Council · · Score: 4, Funny

    the team also found wildlife that were remarkably unafraid of humans

    That's what happens whenever you find animals that haven't encountered humans before. Thing is, the after the first few encounters they'll sort themselves into two groups.

    One group is the ones who learn to be afraid of us. The other, well . . .

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    1. Re:Uh-oh by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny

      We call that other group "tasty".

    2. Re:Uh-oh by Belseth · · Score: 2, Funny
      We call that other group "tasty".

      There are two subgroups to the "Tasty" group, the "Fast" and the "Slow" groups. The Fast animal group tends to be greasier and often deep fried. The Slow group tend to be healthier but not as tasty. It's not clear how wild animals in the Fast group came to be deep fried but it's thought to be a survival adaptation. Of coarse the Intellegent Design faction claim that God simply made them that way. I third theory involves natives with deep fryers but both sides have discounted that theory as rediculous.

    3. Re:Uh-oh by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      Kidding aside, that's exactly what happened to the dodo bird. The hunters considered them stupid for being unafraid, hence calling a stupid person a "dodo".

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    4. Re:Uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is they discovered /.

  6. wood logging companies by jurt1235 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sarcasm on

    They could only reach the remote mountainous area by helicopter, which they described it as akin to finding a "Garden of Eden".

    Wood logging companies & local farmers have been found willing to provide easier access to the area, as a local farmer said:
    I will burn down 5 hectares a month to create new places for my crops. That way tourist will be able to get closer to these pretty animals everyday without having to endanger them (the editor: By them he meant the tourist, because everybody knows that road travel in Indonesia is the safest way to travel) by helicopter.

    A loggin company responded too:
    2 million years without forest maintenance is not good for tourism. We are willing to trim the trees for easier access.

    Sarcasm off

    --

    My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    1. Re:wood logging companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "because everybody knows that road travel in Indonesia is the safest way to travel"

      By this statement I take it you have never driven in Indonesia!

    2. Re:wood logging companies by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

      It was within the sarcasm tags on. I have spent 6 weeks in Indonesia, and I am still alive (amazing!)

      --

      My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
  7. Learning the Birds n' Bees by malia8888 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Dr Beehler, an expert on birds of paradise, which only live in northern Australia and New Guinea, said: "It was very exciting, when two of these birds, a male and a female, which no one has seen alive before ... came into the camp and the male displayed its plumage to the female in full view of the scientists."

    Which is the closest thing to a sex life these scientists have ever had in their bespectacled, nerdy lives. ... Bespectacled? nerdy? I must be projecting heavily here.

    --
    Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
    1. Re:Learning the Birds n' Bees by dimension6 · · Score: 1

      That's "emglassened".

  8. Tourism by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This whole island: Papua and W New Guinea is too dangerous for normal people to consider going there. But is has forests and wildlife which have been wiped out in most other parts of Asia.

    If the politics can be sorted out the people living there will be sitting on an economic goldmine from tourism alone.

    1. Re:Tourism by st1d · · Score: 1

      I'm more interested in the various germs they'll be bringing back to share with the rest of us.

      ---

      Maybe I'm living in a vacuum, but I don't get your sig. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    2. Re:Tourism by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With cannibalism (in some parts), administration problems (to put it mildly) and rampant missionaries trying to save souls, I'm pretty sure tourism is PRETTY low on their list right now.

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    3. Re:Tourism by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Informative
      Maybe I'm living in a vacuum, but I don't get your sig. :)

      The Apollo lunar surface journal is the official record of everything which happened on the moon during the apollo program. It is very detailed. I have plucked it on to my palm pilot and I read it when I have free time.

      Pete Conrad was the commander of the Apollo 12 mission and he is (alas was) a real character. Mike Collins (CM pilot on Apollo 11) said in his book that Conrad was the only astronaut who exactly fitted the public perception of "Buck Rogers" astronauts.

      Neil Armstrong almost ran out of fuel for his landing. He got distracted by the engineering (not his job) and then lost right of the ground during final approach. He was the first, but some would say not the best.

      Conrad got to the landing site early with loads of fuel. He flew a circuit over the landing area, checking out several possible places to set the LM down. This being his only opportunity to fly an LM he found time for a couple of very radical turns at low altitude, nearly turning the LM on its side, throwing it around like he was in an airshow. Then he picked his spot. Hovered for a nice dramatic pause, and plonked the spacecraft right down on the exact edge of surveyor crater.

      The quote is from a point in one of the two EVA's on that flight where Conrad was in a lot of pain from a badly fitting pressure suit, but still kept his focus and managed the occasional joke.

      Al Bean pauses and checks his suit pressure. He says he felt a change in suit pressure

      Conrad: I thought you were going to go off like a ballon there Al!

      The thing is, the man had style.

    4. Re:Tourism by MichaelSmith · · Score: 0, Redundant
      With cannibalism (in some parts), administration problems (to put it mildly) and rampant missionaries trying to save souls, I'm pretty sure tourism is PRETTY low on their list right now.

      Yep

    5. Re:Tourism by krystofa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      PNG does have a reputation for being dangerous. However, it is possible to visit. As a child I used to live in Goroka, although crime was apparent I don't remember it being more of a menace than where I live now, Manchester UK.

      Of course, the /. article isn't clear as to whether this is PNG (East side of the island) or Irian Jaya (The Indonesian province). My understanding of Irian Jaya is that it is dangerous, whereas I have every intention of visiting PNG again I would draw the line at Irian Jaya.

      As with everywhere; if you want to visit, take precausions and read about it first.

    6. Re:Tourism by Crizp · · Score: 1

      Man, thanks a lot for that link - finally something interesting to read :)

    7. Re:Tourism by Weh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmm, I was born in PNG, it is true that Port Moresby is one of the most dangerous cities in the world and there is a lot of unrest going on in the country (Bougainville etc.). However the Indonesian part (I also lived there for a few years) is relatively safe, basically the Indonesians (Javanese) took over the role of the Dutch as colonizers and (at the time) there was military everywhere.

      The biggest threat to wildlife in west papua comes from the mining companies (like Freeport and logging.

    8. Re:Tourism by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      However the Indonesian part (I also lived there for a few years) is relatively safe

      The media here in Melbourne is full of articles about atrocities comitted against the local people by the Indonesian military. These are stories about large groups of people being starved to death and others being more directly murdered.

      With all this stuff coming out I wouldn't be surprised if they go the way of East Timor (ie, having Australia take 80% of their mineral wealth in return for some military help) in the next 20 years or so.

    9. Re:Tourism by Weh · · Score: 1

      I actually meant safe as in "safe for westerners" which is still relatively true. Yes, the Indonesian military aren't a friendly bunch, I've actually heard the locals say that they preferred being colonized by the Dutch to being colonized by the Indonesians (Javanese). When I was there they some fighter jets bombed some villages to suppres some sort of unrest. The Indonesians have a programme called "transmigrasi" in which they encourage people from other parts of indonesia to settle in Papua, one of the goals being to make it a more "indonesian" place.

    10. Re:Tourism by digidave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everywhere looks favourable when you compare it to Manchester.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    11. Re:Tourism by RDW · · Score: 1

      'PNG does have a reputation for being dangerous.'

      Justifiably so, if you're running Windows:

      http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin /ms05-009.mspx

    12. Re:Tourism by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      Hey, I used to work in Goroka, and later in Madang.

      I think the "danger" in PNG is vastly overstated.

    13. Re:Tourism by pmancini · · Score: 1

      Try the Black Hole of Birmingham!

  9. Extinct by sloths · · Score: 1

    Homer:Do'h Do'h.

    --
    really 867993
    Karma schkarma
  10. Dangerous? by ami-in-hamburg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't understand the dangerous comment? I was there in 1994 when I was in the Marines and it didn't seem dangerous to me at all. The people were actually very friendly and the diving is awesome.

    They did warn us not to go anywhere alone but there was some kind of civil war going on at the time. That was nowhere near Papua though.

    Overall, I thought it was a pretty cool place!

    1. Re:Dangerous? by dolphin558 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Given that you were a Marine that came with a heavily armed task force and loads of firepower I would not be surprised if you were given a welcome reception. :)

    2. Re:Dangerous? by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Hahah, ah its a weird place. They stop fighting and pose for you if you have a camera. Still, I wouldn't go back there with anyone I cared about.

    3. Re:Dangerous? by st1d · · Score: 1

      Dad's joking, he takes us on vacation there every year. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
  11. Well, obviously... by st1d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...we'll have to send a number of scientists into the area to catalog all these new finds. Several teams of to catalog plants, birds, insects, mammels, etc. Then we'll need to create research areas for these scientists to work, because they'll need time to do all the research needed. Naturally, they'll need supplies, and flying in supplies to so many scientists will be extremely costly, so we should build a few roads to deliver goods to all the areas they'll be working in. It's a large area, so we should probably build a little infrastructure for refueling and medical needs, as well. That infrastructure will require power, so we should run a number of power lines to each of the various places. Of course, with this much research to be done, it would be a lot to ask for those scientists to have to leave their families behind for long periods of time, so we should build accomodations for their families. Those kids of theirs will need an education, so schools are a must. All work and no play is bad for morale, so we should build a few different types of entertainment for the residents, too. Naturally, with this many people in a newly discovered source of rare and unknown plants and animals, we need to make sure no one takes animals and plants out of the area, so we'll need to make sure we provide a healthy number of resource control officers, and they have needs and families as well. Geez, with this many people, we're bound to have crime and disorganization, so we'll need police and government officials to help maintain the order. Of course, we'll need judges and lawyers, to keep the police and politicians honest and make sure balance is maintained somewhat. We'll need construction workers to help build all this, and they'll need... :)

    --
    Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    1. Re:Well, obviously... by zardor · · Score: 1

      But did they find any oil?

      --
      -- We don't understand software, and sometimes we don't understand hardware, but we can *see* the blinking lights
    2. Re:Well, obviously... by st1d · · Score: 1

      No, but rumor has it they found a rich vein of copper...right under the surface. :(

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
  12. So nice to see the experts in action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "suggesting its previous contact with man was negligible."

    Let's try, suggesting that there are no natural predators? I thought we just went through the whole speil of bad science and what that does to someone's credibility...

  13. How do YOU taste by Mrs.+Grundy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you read the article you may have notice the passing reference to the giant cassowary. It's basically a four foot chicken with a bad temper and a crazy look in its eye who can use its razor-sharp talons to disembowel a man where he stands. That's right, this is one of the last remaining birds that can easily kill a person and while it's not a man-eater, I'm sure there are plenty of other animals in the jungle that would be happy to let the cassowary play the butcher and carve you up like a holiday ham for their culinary delight. So before you start wondering about what kind of wine to server with tree kangaroo, you might first stop to ask yourself, how do you taste.

    1. Re:How do YOU taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Salty.

    2. Re:How do YOU taste by st1d · · Score: 1, Funny

      Rumor has it the giant cassowary has a penchant for Cheetos(TM) flavored human fingertips. Just thought you should know. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    3. Re:How do YOU taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zing!

    4. Re:How do YOU taste by eskimopi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sloppy, sloppy research. All you had to do was use SPELL CHECK! Even Word spell check! Then you would realize that you were actually talking about the Giant Cappowary. It is also a giant chicken (kismet favors you, my friend), and it can also disembowel you (also correct...miraculously), but it doesn't just use its claws like a raptor. It uses an artistic blend of dancing and martial arts to rend your innards. Much like the American system of gym-kata, a rich blend which evolved in the mid-eighties, the cappowary differs in that it sucks in Tekken 2, and that it evolved millions of years ago in Brazil and apparently Papua-New Guinea. Hooray science. Boo you, for poor research, though. You should research the sloth, you lazy bastard.

    5. Re:How do YOU taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you live in soviet russia ?

    6. Re:How do YOU taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually down there it's the humans who may well get you, since they practiced cannibalism until a few decades ago (and probably still do when there's no interfering missionaries around). I've seen a book on the Papua New Guinean natives them showing photos of them roasting a human head on a large metal tray-like thing over a fire. Yummy!

    7. Re:How do YOU taste by o2binbuzios · · Score: 0

      Mod this up... I get it...Capoeira is one of the great spectacles of any Brasilian culture show. ( http://www.capoeira.com/ )Anybody who can pun on Zoology and Martial Arts deserves a few mod points..

    8. Re:How do YOU taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, like pork.

      You may recall that the South Sea islanders who enjoyed a little cannibalism refered to man as 'long pig'. They may still do so, for all I know.

      And the pig has very similar body structures to ourselves - so much so that pig heart valves were once used for organ transplants (and may still be, for all I know).

      But the cincher for me was an experience while welding in the kitchen (as you do...). When you hit rust you get a shower of sparks, and one minute globule of molten metal hit me on an unprotected tbumb. It was very small, but white hot, and burnt straight through my skin before stopping. I put my thumb in my mouth (reflex action) and was rewarded with a strong taste of pork crackling. Under a glass, the edges of the wound looked exactly like the skin on a pork roast.

      So /. has now had a post from an auto-cannibal. And if this doesn't get modded informative, I'll eat my ......

    9. Re:How do YOU taste by iphayd · · Score: 1

      Very good with some fava beans and a nice chianti.

    10. Re:How do YOU taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm. Sounds like the ideal bird to start off your turducken with. Obviously it would then become more of a Casturducken, but thats just a technical point...

    11. Re:How do YOU taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw several in australian jungle and they paid no attention to me... Cassowary are endangered and should be protected. They are an amazing creature.

    12. Re:How do YOU taste by kalirion · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wow, never heard of this bird before, so I wikipedia'd it. Of particular interest:

      The Southern Cassowary is the second-largest bird in Australia and the third-largest remaining bird in the world (after the ostrich and emu). Adult Southern Cassowaries are 1.5 to 1.8 m (5½ feet) tall and weigh about 60 kilograms (130 pounds). They have a bony casque on the head that is used to batter through underbrush, making them the only armoured bird in the world. Females are bigger and more brightly coloured.

      A cassowary's three-toed feet have sharp claws; the dagger-like middle claw is 120 mm (5 inches) long. This claw is particularly dangerous since the Cassowary can use it to kill an enemy, disemboweling it with a single kick. They can run up to 50 km/h (32 mph) through the dense forrest, pushing aside small trees and brush with their boney casques. They can jump up to 1.5 m (5 feet) and they are good swimmers.

      The 2004 edition of the Guiness Book of Records lists the cassowary as the world's most dangerous bird. Normally cassowaries are very shy but when disturbed can lash out dangerously with their powerful legs. During World War II American and Australian troops stationed in New Guinea were warned to steer clear of the birds. They are capable of inflicting serious injuries on an adult human, even causing death, but these instances usually result from provocation by the human, or are due to the involvement of dogs; wounded or cornered birds are particularly dangerous. Humans are well advised to stay away from Cassowaries in their natural environment as the bird can easily outmaneuver even an armed person. Cassowaries, deftly using their surroundings to conceal their movements, have been known to out-flank organized groups of human predators. Cassowaries are considered to be one of the most dangerous animals to keep in zoos, based on the frequency and severity of injuries incurred by zookeepers.

      An unprovoked attack on a Papua New Guinea village has also been documented, but was the result of a bird previously raised in captivity being released into the wild. At least two people, a man and his mother, were confirmed to have died as a result of this attack.

      More recently, Cassowaries have been known to lose their natural fear of man. As a result, large areas of Australian National Parks have been temporarily closed to avoid human contact with the bird.

    13. Re:How do YOU taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So before you start wondering about what kind of wine to server with tree kangaroo, you might first stop to ask yourself, how do you taste.


      What.. what a sense of humour!

      Well, there's this thing called an opposable thumb that lets me hold an object which fires a .223 round into such kangaroos and birds. Problem solved!
    14. Re:How do YOU taste by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      So, sometimes you eat the giant cassowary, sometimes the giant cassowary eats you...

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    15. Re:How do YOU taste by eskimopi · · Score: 1

      gracias. i had to open a frikkin account to put this one up. point me for that, too.

    16. Re:How do YOU taste by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      Actually, you could probably make some money from that. Outfit a guy with armour and a sword, and let him fight the giant cassowary. Rent the armour & sword and charge a fee for each cassowary, and you could make a packet...

    17. Re:How do YOU taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read up on them. They have the advantage in pretty much all situations. Unless you want to nuke them. Yeah, they're that fucking vicious...

    18. Re:How do YOU taste by mikeron · · Score: 1
      So before you start wondering about what kind of wine to server with tree kangaroo, you might first stop to ask yourself, how do you taste.
      An Australian Chiraz would be perfect with wood-fired tree kangaroo.
    19. Re:How do YOU taste by pmancini · · Score: 1

      On a somewhat related note, combining U.S. Service personel and dangerous animals has traditionally been a problem. For example in the history of the U.S. Navy Seals there has not been a single injury from shark attack. And by that they mean none that weren't the result of the shark being provoked for fun by the Seals. Actual numbers vary but its significantly higher than 0. I can't remember the source of that tidbit but it might have been Richard Marcinco.

    20. Re:How do YOU taste by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > It's basically a four foot chicken with a bad temper and a crazy look in its eye who
      > can use its razor-sharp talons to disembowel a man where he stands.

      Yeah, but does it pack heat?

      No? Too bad. I bet it tastes like chicken.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  14. Lost World: Jurassic Park by dolphin558 · · Score: 0, Interesting

    How ironic, I happen to be reading the Lost World now. I did read years ago that remote parts of Papua New Guinea are considered among the last unexplored regions outside of Antartica (parts of Mongolia being the other). I'm all for exploration but I hope the Indonesian authorities make every effort to preserve this 4,000 sq mile habitat.

  15. pictures? by phyl0x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    any idea when pictures are going to show up? magazines? tv specials?

    1. Re:pictures? by phyl0x · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't. It's always Obscured by Clouds ;>.

  16. How many? by deep44 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    We found dozens, if not hundreds, of new species ..
    Dozens? Hundreds? Do you mean to tell me that nobody actually counted?
    1. Re:How many? by st1d · · Score: 2, Informative

      They did, but the darn things kept running/flying away.

      "1, 2, 3...1, 2...1, 2, 3..."

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    2. Re:How many? by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Informative

      We found dozens, if not hundreds, of new species ..

      Dozens? Hundreds? Do you mean to tell me that nobody actually counted?


      I think the problem is that you can't always tell two organisms are of different species with a quick glance. Sometimes you actually need to do things like behavioral or genetic studies to be sure. Also, until they've had time to sort through the records, there's also the possibility that some of the species they've discovered have already been found elsewhere.

    3. Re:How many? by Kgosi+Makwati · · Score: 1

      They should have recorded their "findings".
      Looks like someone is hiping this inorder to justify research money!

    4. Re:How many? by srussia · · Score: 1, Informative

      That may be due to the fact that "species" is a term so vague as to be scientifically useless.

      See the discussion in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Species

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    5. Re:How many? by st1d · · Score: 1

      You mean like the Nature Conservancy?
      .
      Gotta love folks that get government grants to buy land, then resell it and keep the profits. Free enterprise at work...

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
  17. What does mean for animal testing by it0 · · Score: 0

    What extra features does this new guinea pig have?

  18. large mamamals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    large mammals hunted to near extinction elsewhere.

    Are these large mammals, per chance, violent in nature?
    Do they like to toss around wooden objects?
    Ik know of only one wild Stevus Ballmerus in our world. Maybe they found the origin of the Throwus Chairus family?
  19. Koala / Dolphin cross? by klang · · Score: 0

    Did they find the Koala/Dolphin cross hinted at here with a picture here ?

  20. Animals *must* develop a fear of humans by Jivha · · Score: 1

    Just started reading "Guns, Germs and Steel" by Jared Diamond yesterday. An interesting book which promises to trace and explain the evolution of human societies.

    The book starts out by mentioning how large mammals went extinct in America and Australia when humans reached there. The reason was because these animals evolved without co-existing with man(hunter) and hence did not develop a natural fear of man. As a result when man came upon them, he literally clubbed them to extinction.

    I guess the new mammals(tree kangaroos, spiny anteaters...) that are being found in New Guinea may be slightly better off than their ancestors because of the better understanding of conservation/environmental awareness our present world has.

    Still I wonder how many of these new species will still be around(in the wild) in about 30-40 years?

    1. Re:Animals *must* develop a fear of humans by st1d · · Score: 1

      Speared, not clubbed. The first guy that tried clubbing one probably learned his own lesson about survival of the fittest...

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    2. Re:Animals *must* develop a fear of humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an aside, read Guns, Germs, and Steel with a pinch of salt... It is an interesting read, but apparently uses lots of discredited geographical theories. Balance his book with J.M. Blaut's Eight Eurocentric Historians, where he disects marxist, capitalist and environmental historians that have a eurocentric bias...

      Guns Germs and Steel won awards, I think, because it kind of absolved the West of any responsibility in mass poverty around the world. It was all down to geography, as people interpreted from the book (though I personally don't think that is what the author intended to imply...)

    3. Re:Animals *must* develop a fear of humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what are you saying the differences are down to then, apart from environment?

    4. Re:Animals *must* develop a fear of humans by TheOriginalRevdoc · · Score: 1

      The book starts out by mentioning how large mammals went extinct in America and Australia when humans reached there. The reason was because these animals evolved without co-existing with man(hunter) and hence did not develop a natural fear of man. As a result when man came upon them, he literally clubbed them to extinction.

      That might have happened in some places at some time, but to state it like that (and I know that Diamond uses a lot of 'just-so-stories' like this in his book) is a gross oversimplification. For example, in most places, the ice age megafauna that he's talking about were regularly killed by predators, so we have no reason to expect that they'd ignore human predators when they arrived. There's also the issue of climate change, and environmental change brought on by human presence, such as the regular burning of undergrowth, which probably caused a number of extinctions on their own.

      However, it is true that some large animals in some regions lacked predators, so it's safe to assume that humans had a hand in their extinction - for example, the New Zealand moa (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moa). But in that case, you also have a human population explosion, the much easier task of stealing moa eggs, a small geographic region, and other factors that make extinction more likely than just killing adult birds the size of Andre the Giant.

  21. Needs by sleppy1 · · Score: 1
    The problem is that people confuse need and want. Once you've gotten used to something being available you think you need it. Really it's just that life is "easier" with it, or possibly that you have become addicted to the presence of it through habituation. You want it because it's familiar and makes you comfortable.

    You know what we really need out here? An -mart. (insert your choice of big box store here).

    Humanity replicates familiar environments, not because we need them, but because the presence of familiarity reduces stress. Any species would do the same thing. Ants build anthills. Cats mark their territories. Humans build highways and cities and suburbs and strip malls. It's our "thing".

    --


    "Nobody's ever going to make any money on the internet"
    --VP of the company I worked for, circa 1995
  22. Noah by quokkapox · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Noah had a big ark, and was really thorough.

    Or there maybe could be something to this new "Theory" of "Evolution".

    How many more of these discoveries do we need before the fanatics finally give it up?

    Tree Kangaroos. Five hundred previously unknown plant species. Wow. Just wow.

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    1. Re:Noah by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually "Noahs Ark" was a franchise, there were millions of arks all over the world. Unfortunately they weren't perfect and millions of animals never made it onto the ark but you wont have heard of them because the ones which weren't fish all died.

    2. Re:Noah by Khomar · · Score: 1
      Noah had a big ark, and was really thorough. Or there maybe could be something to this new "Theory" of "Evolution". How many more of these discoveries do we need before the fanatics finally give it up?

      That is because this is not a proof of macro-evolution. Macro-evolution is the idea that a generation of a particular species can create brand new genes that take their offspring in a totally new direction. Micro-evolution is the idea that different species can form from similar genetic ancestors through isolation and selective breeding. Micro-evolution has been observed, is repeatable, and is as close to fact as science can get. Macro-evolution, while theoretically possible, has yet to be observed in nature. The "proof" of this theory lies in fossil records and observed similarities between species, but until it is actually observed in nature, it will be difficult to prove conclusively.

      Micro-evolution can create an amazing range of diversity from a single common ancestor. It is important to remember that the identification of species is rather arbitrary. The species is generally defined to be a group of creates that procreates, but it is sometimes difficult to determine when cross-breeding could occur between species. For example, consider all of the wide variety of breeds of dog. We know that they can interbreed, so we call them one species. However, if we had discovered these animals independently around the world, it would be reasonable to assume that a Great Dane and a Chihuahua were different species, though closely related. Until we actually observed the ability to breed between them (is that physically possible? :-) ), we would have no reason to change that hypothesis. Truly the genetic variety that is observed even within a single species is staggering.

      On the other hand, there are clear distinctions between families of creatures. A horse will not mate with a dog, for example. In the case of Noah, assuming for a moment that the story is true, it is possible that he collected two of each family of animals, each pair containing the genetic potential of the wide variety of animals we see today. It is interesting to note that the human race has three primary races -- the mongol, the negro, and the anglo -- and Noah is said to have had three sons, each of which could have had their own dominant genes. Considering the diversity we see in humans today (pygmies, midgets, the giants of the NBA, skin tones), how much genetic diversity would have been destroyed if the vast majority of the human race had been killed in a world-wide flood? Is it possible that the pre-historic "species" of man that have been discovered where merely examples of human diversity before the Biblical flood? (And they could have been a lot smarter than we give them credit for... just as prejudice clouds our judgement of those around us today.)

      There are fanatics on both sides of this issue -- neither side wants to even consider the possibilities presented by the other. There are lots of questions that have yet to be answered in this world. We know far less than we think we do about life and the world around us. My own view of the origins of life is constantly being challenged and shaped as I read about these kinds of discoveries, and the answers become more amazing and wonderful as time goes on.

      Five hundred previously unknown plant species. Wow. Just wow.

      Amen. :-)

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    3. Re:Noah by SHP · · Score: 1

      Wonderful post. Non-argumentative, clear, rational. What are you doing on Slashdot?

  23. no man's land... by layer3switch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "This is a place with no roads or trails and never, so far as we know, visited by man ... This proves there are still places to be discovered that man has not touched."

    Lets keep it that way. "Do Not Feed The Animal" sign is kinda getting old right now.

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  24. makes me wonder by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's finds like this which make me wonder: are there still what we consider to be "dinosaurs" - and what were considered "dragons" prior to 1850 or so - roaming the remote places of the earth? There seems to be quite a few first-hand accounts of such sightings, but no hard evidence.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:makes me wonder by jibjibjib · · Score: 0

      The ancient Egyptian civilisation also lasted for thousands of years, but they never got to cars, computers and automatic washers. I believe civilisation has been continuously developing since the beginning, so any developments in the last 2000 years were built on top of the developments of the previous 2000 years.
      Also, the level of development of a civilisation depends on lots of things apart from the time it has existed. The ancient Greeks and Romans had about the same level of technology as medieval Europeans in some areas, so it is quite possible for civilisations to exist for a long time without developing our level of technology. I think if a high-tech society existed before the flood, we would see more obvious evidence of this now.

    2. Re:makes me wonder by st1d · · Score: 1

      Well, I enjoy a good thought experiment now and then, so why not? Besides, a part of me thinks maybe we aren't as brilliant and advanced as we'd like to believe we are. Pretty much every time I meet someone new...

      The difficult part might be explaining why people would feel the need to create a T-Rex and it's kin, or some of the other massive, potentially dangerous animals (garbage disposals?!). It also pokes a hole in the ol' bird from dinosaur theory, too. On the upside, maybe they created used Apatosauruses(i?) as eco-friendly cranes or something. Then again, look at the goofy stuff we come up with, just to entertain ourselves.

      Heck, run with it, who knows where you end up. Even if the theory falls apart, you might be able to get a good fiction novel out of it. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    3. Re:makes me wonder by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      It's finds like this which make me wonder: are there still what we consider to be "dinosaurs" - and what were considered "dragons" prior to 1850 or so - roaming the remote places of the earth?

      Sure there are. They've got quite a lot smaller, grown feathers, and learned to fly, though.

      I doubt there's any really big animals left to be discovered on land. The likes of giant dinosaurs need to eat a lot. A breeding colony of those things would be hard to hide.

      So: don't hold your breath waiting for the discovery of the Lost World, or for Nessie... if cryptozoology is your thing, then my money's on the Yeti.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:makes me wonder by scutato · · Score: 1

      Hah, actually I wondered why they would do it in the first place also, but it could have always ended up like Jurassic Park. Experiment gone wrong? The idea you suggested also crossed my mind (using the animals for work). Another situation is if genetic experimentation developed faster than other technologies in their civilization. Then they could have been used for all kinds of things, possibly including transportation. Of course, the idea of playing with genes without the use of computers doesn't make too much sense, but then again...it's just a theory ;)

    5. Re:makes me wonder by Skythe · · Score: 0

      But this idea is not consistent with the intelligent designer! (joking, im not trying to start another creationism debate). You know, this first thing i thought of when i read this theory was stargate. You should apply to be a writer :p

      Evidently there would be some sort of evidence or past legacy of this civilisation. A gigantic, worldwide flood is not going to destroy an exploration vessel (made of a strong material at least.. a civilisation able to genetically engineer their own crazy creatures would at least posses such materials) at the bottom of the Atlantic ocean. Sure, thousands of years may erode it, but there would at least still be some evidence per se, no? I think evidence conceding with the ice ages has been accumulating recently, perhaps a shift in the whatever ocean current also caused some sort of global ice age wiping out the dinosaurs? Or we could stick with the tried and tested meteor(ite?) theory that meteor x caused crater y and explosion z, cataclysmically wiping out life as .. we knew it.

      Does anyone else feel the need to google every word they may have potentially spelt wrong to make sure they dont get criticized :P?

    6. Re:makes me wonder by scutato · · Score: 1

      First, in regards to your question on googling every word to make sure it's spelled right...yes. I did that with the word "consistent" in my post :)

      Evidently there would be some sort of evidence or past legacy of this civilisation. A gigantic, worldwide flood is not going to destroy an exploration vessel (made of a strong material at least.. a civilisation able to genetically engineer their own crazy creatures would at least posses such materials) at the bottom of the Atlantic ocean.

      Indeed, you would think there would be some sort of evidence, but as far as I know, the ocean surface is very irregular and effectively unexplored/unrecorded. If you imagine a world-wide flood capable of converting most organic matter into oil/coal (or at least burying it so it turned into oil down the road), I think most traces of the civilization would also be buried.

      Of course, if you take the Bible literally, and God did flood the earth...perhaps He didn't want there to be traces of the civilization left behind? I can think of a few reasons why...

    7. Re:makes me wonder by Crizp · · Score: 1
      The idea you suggested also crossed my mind (using the animals for work)

      Well they probably used the dinosaurs as babysitters!
    8. Re:makes me wonder by jibjibjib · · Score: 0

      A better example would be space junk. Even after thousands of years, I think there still would be some orbiting junk left from an older civilisation, if they developed spaceflight technology.
      Though such a civilisation might be able to survive the flood also.

    9. Re:makes me wonder by Gumshoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "if cryptozoology is your thing, then my money's on the Yeti."

      The Orang Pendek of Sumatra is a much more likely candidate IMO.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/3734 946.stm

      http://www.forteantimes.com/articles/182_orang1.sh tml

    10. Re:makes me wonder by WRXminion · · Score: 1

      I don't really want to argue about the legitimacy of the bible, I'll let pen and teller do that for me.. link It's a fairly long vid, but they do touch on this very subject. oh if u take the bible literally enjoy your 144 cubits home when u die.

    11. Re:makes me wonder by st1d · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, maybe they developed spaceflight, traveled to mars and venus, filled venus up with greenhouse gases and cooked themselves, and the martians nuked the heck out of the planet. Or maybe they left the solar system altogether, realizing that human evolution on earth had reached a high point, and was on it's way downhill... :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    12. Re:makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difficult part might be explaining why people would feel the need to create a T-Rex

      Not difficult at all. My wife was a great fan. She'd be delighted if Marc Bolan were raised from the dead.

    13. Re:makes me wonder by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      are there still what we consider to be "dinosaurs" - and what were considered "dragons" prior to 1850 or so - roaming the remote places of the earth?

      Why "remote" ? You've got plenty of them right out the window !

      Thomas

    14. Re:makes me wonder by KaushalParekh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Check out the Komodo dragon. Their saliva is so infectious that just a bite kills the prey. It could have been the source of fire-breathing dragon mythology.

  25. Cats by sleppy1 · · Score: 1
    Not always. Some animals have evolved to be cute and fuzzy like cats. They survive better _not_ being afraid of humans.

    Cats have an added advantage surviving in a human dominated environment. As my Chinese friend told me when I asked whether Chinese people really eat cats: "No!! Cat sour."

    --


    "Nobody's ever going to make any money on the internet"
    --VP of the company I worked for, circa 1995
    1. Re:Cats by st1d · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great, now all I have to do is figure out what the "sweet" is in "sweet and cat pork". :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    2. Re:Cats by Redwin · · Score: 1

      Great, now all I have to do is figure out what the "sweet" is in "sweet and cat pork". :)

      Blackadder: "One thing still puzzles me Baldrick, how did you get so much custard out of such a small cat"

      --
      Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.
  26. Save them! by ben_1432 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When will they be hosing them down with tugboats?

  27. Re:Whoa by User+956 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Keanu? Is that you?

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  28. Thylacines (Marsupial Wolf) ?? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hopefully this might provide more public incentive in terms of supporting conservation efforts.

    This raises some interesting possibilities. According to some of the local tribes, Thylacines supposedly still exist in some of the high mountain valleys of New Guinea. It would be really nice if a viable population was found and this sounds like just the place where that might happen. If that was the case the I bet the Australians will be interested.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:Thylacines (Marsupial Wolf) ?? by wrfelts · · Score: 1
      Although questionable, due to lack of pictures, video, or specimins. The locals in P.N.G. have also reported a "Ropen", which, by their description, resembles the Rhamphorhynchus .

      Here is a site on another P.N.G. expedition designed specifically to document and find these animals.

  29. Recommended Reading by bmgoau · · Score: 3, Informative

    Recommended Reading: Throwim Way Leg - Tim Flannery

    Documents the journy's of a mammalian biologist during his 11 years in Puapua New Guinuie

    *First Contact with new tribes
    *Discovery of new spiders, snakes, tree kangaroos etc

  30. Common sense area unit by Life700MB · · Score: 3, Funny


    For the ignorants out there, an area of two million acres is equivalente to a 1,264M Volkwagens one.

    No, really.


    --
    Superb hosting 20GB Storage, 1_TB_ bandwidth, ssh, $7.95

    1. Re:Common sense area unit by quokkapox · · Score: 1
      For the ignorants out there, an area of two million acres is equivalente to a 1,264M Volkwagens one. No, really.

      I hereby nominate you for the Slashdot Most Incoherent Post award for today, February 7, 2006.

      --
      it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    2. Re:Common sense area unit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, I cannot understand your European measurement system. Could you convert that into State Capital buildings for the US readers?

      Thanks,
      Nis

  31. The japanese will be happy! by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

    which has more than two million acres of old growth tropical forest.

    Does somebody say wood chipping?

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  32. I really hope by Skythe · · Score: 0

    they find some way of protecting this new proverbial garden of eden. It would be really upsetting if evil poachers got into the area and started killing everything. And lets hope the government dosen't do anything stupid and allows the area to be studied. Alternativly, we can be like brazil and bulldoze millions of hectares of forestland, destroying potential new drugs and wiping out never before seen genetic traits for a bit of wood and farmland. But arguably the aesthetic value and opportunity to study these strange new creature based overlords would be far more invaluable. Turn it into untouchable national park!

  33. Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best location reference I can find on Google for the Foja Mountains is:
    02 29' S, 138 00' E

    Type into Google Earth and zoom out.

    1. Re:Where? by Paua+Fritter · · Score: 1

      damn - Google's not too helpful actually ... lovely images of cloud cover and

      We are sorry, but we don't have maps at this zoom level for this region.

      ... and you can't even get there from here ...

      We could not calculate driving directions between wellington, new zealand and -2 28' 60.00", +138 0' 0.00" (-2.483333, 138.000000) @-2.483333,138.000000.

  34. New species are nothing new by stunt_penguin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not that hard to find a new species- walk into any isolated forested region on earth and before you know it you'll be batting away unclassified insects, hacking your way through undiscovered shrubs, and if you're really unlucky, being poisoned by some new snake venom or frog toxin. People should realise that we really don't know shit about what's in the rainforests of the Amazon, never mind Papua New Guinea.

    This is, however an excellent discovery, and I don't mean to just dismiss the achievements of the scientists involved- I just want to point out that there are thousands of types of plants and animals out there that we haven't classified yet.

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  35. new species of guinea pigs..... by Irishkayaker · · Score: 1

    ...frogs, butterflies and plants. And one giant gorilla, of course. :)

    1. Re:new species of guinea pigs..... by sdsichero · · Score: 1

      Does that gorilla fight any dinosaurs there?

  36. google has nothing on this place at all by Paua+Fritter · · Score: 2, Funny
    and what's more:
    Your search for pizza near -2 28' 60.00", +138 0' 0.00" did not match any locations.
    folks! don't even bother
  37. Poachers guide to getting rich by Skythe · · Score: 0

    1) Travel to remote, unexplored area via barge 2) Find rare species of animal, kill, cut off distinct physiological feature 3) ??? 4) Profit!

    1. Re:Poachers guide to getting rich by Skythe · · Score: 0

      damn, forgot to use br, *e-embarrased*

  38. NYtimes article, with pictures by animeshpathak · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here it is. Free registration/bugmenot required :-).
    -A

    --
    "- What's so unpleasant about being drunk?"
    "- You ask a glass of water."[from h2g2]
  39. Wildlife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The team also found wildlife that were remarkably unafraid of humans"

    Indeed, women truly are inhuman. For them to make such a discovery only now, one could easily tell the team is from /.

  40. Administration-approved report title by cno3 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    After a thorough scrubbing, the new title of this scientific discovery reads:
    "Two million acres of old growth tropical forest discovered; available to the highest timber-industry bidder."

  41. Homo floresiensis? by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Any nasty hobbitses?

  42. Previous contact with man by Dekortage · · Score: 1

    From the article: Like all the mammals found in the area, it was completely unafraid of humans and could be easily picked up, suggesting its previous contact with man was negligible.

    I suppose it would be impossible for humans to interact with animals in such kind or friendly ways that the animals wouldn't learn to be frightened of them, eh? That's too bad.

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:Previous contact with man by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I still find it kind of weird though.

      If it was an environment with reasonably large predators, then most animals small enough to be picked up by a human wouldn't want to be close to any strange unknown animal.

      It must be a relatively safe environment then? Either that or the animals could sense that they weren't in any danger and there are very few sneaky/deceptive predators there[1]?

      Anyway, IMO it's usually not really a matter of "learning to be afraid", it's more like the fearless and ignorant get killed.

      Most of the mice and small creatures (geckos) out there don't have to learn to run away - those that didn't run away died out long ago.

      I wonder if we are getting a higher percentage of "fearless" (low sense of self-preservation) humans given the relatively safe environments many of us live in nowadays.

      [1] humans can be a deceitful bunch. They could pretend to not be interested in killing the animal, and next thing you know, wham!

      --
  43. Deforestation by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    What are we waiting for to send bulldozers over there?

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Deforestation by st1d · · Score: 1

      Duh, we're waiting till the beachside resorts are built, so the workers have someplace to rest. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
  44. Those attitudes die harder than that by ianscot · · Score: 1
    more public incentive in terms of supporting conservation efforts.

    Swear to God, the folks who think "environmentalists" are irritating luddites who want to return humanity to the stone age have already long since had the thought: "If these 'near extinction' species can be found in a place like this, then they don't need to be protected quite so much. What was all the stink about? Can the island of Komodo put out licenses on dragons yet?..."

    Those people bend any environmental issue into a caricature. Spotted owls were just a representative of the entire temperate rainforest ecosystem they lived in, they weren't the whole story. It still took no time for the stereotype of the whacky environmentalist who wants to ruin a whole industry to protect the spotted owl to spring up.

    Even convincing that sort of person to preserve "hot spots" like this one is an uphill battle, leaving alone general conservation issues. In the US, the Republican Party that produced Teddy Roosevelt is long gone, having been split in the 1910s...

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:Those attitudes die harder than that by SirBruce · · Score: 1
      Those people bend any environmental issue into a caricature.

      No, the environmentalist movement largely did this to itself.

      Spotted owls were just a representative of the entire temperate rainforest ecosystem they lived in, they weren't the whole story.

      Of course they were the whole story! If they weren't, then there was another species in the "temperature rainforest ecosystem", as you call it, which would have been put forth as endangered. But no, it was the spotted owl that was at issue.

      More importantly, it was not even that the spotted owl was endangered in old growth forests, thus putting a roadblock to logging there. It was that they were found to live in second and third growth forests, too, and rather than sensibly taking this to mean that we could now go back and log old growth forests responsibly without endangering the spotted owl, it led to the shutting down of logging in the newer forests as well, thus killing the logging industry and putting tens of thousands of people into poverty. No wonder the Democrats like this; the more jobs they eliminate with their "caring" lesgislation, the more poor people they create whom they can then turn around and court for votes in return for federal aid dollars, which they just steal from rich people.

      It still took no time for the stereotype of the whacky environmentalist who wants to ruin a whole industry to protect the spotted owl to spring up.

      That's because environmentalists ARE wacky people who want to ruin entire industries and send mankind back to the stone age. Perhaps you don't feel that way, and I sympathize with you and other moderates of your movement who simply want reasonable conservation measure. But the "leaders" of the environmentalist movement, the ones getting on TV and running organizations like Greenpeace and PETA and so on, really DO want to eliminate entire industries, free all animals from any human involvement, ban the eating of meat and fish, etc. And so long as you keep supporting such extremeists in order to further your cause, you'll be ridiculed like the crazy whackjobs you are.

      If you don't believe me, you should check out a few episodes of Penn & Teller: Bullshit. It'll set you straight.

      Even convincing that sort of person to preserve "hot spots" like this one is an uphill battle, leaving alone general conservation issues. In the US, the Republican Party that produced Teddy Roosevelt is long gone, having been split in the 1910s...

      Teddy Roosevelt, while respecting the environment, nevertheless participated in expeditions that killed THOUSANDS of animals, including endangered ones. Your fellow environmentalists wouldn't like his kind of conservation any more than current Republicans. Do you seriously think Teddy wouldn't want to drill in ANWR?

      Bruce

  45. I didn't lose my chance after all! by waif69 · · Score: 1

    I still do have the opportunity to cause a species to become extinct.

    Go ahead and mod me down. Damn tree-huggers!

  46. extinction & genocide all in one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the newly found species wont be around long as the indonesian army (tni) controlled / protected loggers eat up the two million acres of old growth tropical forest. the indigenous population is also facing genocide from the same tni, with massive resettlements from the overcrowded central indonesia. the widespread poverty, cronyism and corruption of local officials, and military and police ongoping human rights violations screams out that the island is in crisis. dont hold your breath to see coverage on cnn or faux news. a large part of these profits go to buy more usa military hardware to continue the reign of the armed forces.

    source - cia world facts & google

  47. Record Long Time by dunc78 · · Score: 1

    Wow, I was shocked how long it took for the first person to start THE argument that happens every time any science article is posted. The parent will eventually be modded +5 Insightful and all posts from that time forward will be about Evolution and Intelligent Design and the original article will be a distant memory.

    1. Re:Record Long Time by gunmod · · Score: 1

      Sad isn't it? The athesist always have to jump in with their "evolution is god" THEORY every time something scientific is posted. Talk about being a fanatic.

    2. Re:Record Long Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, don't draw any cartoons of evolution if you value your embassies.

    3. Re:Record Long Time by dunc78 · · Score: 1

      What is sad is that you think putting your arguments forward is going to change their mind and they think that putting their arguments forward is going to change your mind. Neither is changing their mind, and if you want to look at what each side is going to say just look back in every other thread relating to a science article. It gets old seeing the same arguments rehashed every day. As Ben Franklin said, "insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results." I'm not saying people shouldn't discuss one side or the other, but it is obvious when a comment is made not for constructive discussion but for provocation (as the parent was).

  48. Foja Mountains.. by aapold · · Score: 1

    Most people don't realize how high the mountain range that runs down the spine of New Guinea is... the article mentions the Foja Mountains go up to about 2200 meters (which is in the 6500 to 7000 foot range which is only half the height of the highest peaks on the range, but still, given the differences between there and sea level, spectacularly rugged. Puncak Jaya (aka Mt. Wilhelm) is the highest peak on an island in the world.

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  49. I can't believe this hasn't been said yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new endemic Foja Mountains overlords!

  50. Le Valle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Haven't any of you seen Le Valle (The Valley - Obscured by Clouds)?
    Pink Floyd was there in 1973...

  51. continued... by Mike_K · · Score: 1

    The scientists proceeded to whip out their rifles and go hunting. The newly discovered species' expected survival time is no more than two years before repeated extinction.

    m

  52. Tastes like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tastes just like bald eagle!

  53. When a new species of wildlife is unafraid of you by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    That's your signal to run for your life.

  54. Bad Geography! by John+Jamieson · · Score: 1

    The last time I was down there, New Guinea was still an independant country. Independance happened in the 70's or 80's I believe when Australia released them. (it is not owned by Indonesia as the article states)

    The other half of the Island had renamed itself West Papua, but it used to be called Irian Jaya. It is claimed by Indonesia.

    1. Re:Bad Geography! by keriaan · · Score: 1

      The name New Guinea applies to the whole island. The independant country is Papua New Guinea. The Indonesian half of the island was the province of Irian Jaya until a few years ago when it was renamed Papua. It has been/is now being divided up into a few provinces.

      The scientists were working in an area in the Indonesian province of Papua.

  55. In our own backyard by LukePieStalker · · Score: 1

    So we don't need to look to the stars to find new life forms after all.

  56. Re:giant gorilla? by AlienSlav · · Score: 0

    OH come now WWII Japanese soldier still fighting the war, hasn't had a hair cut in a while.
    AlienSlave

  57. Exoskeleton? by Some+Random+Username · · Score: 1

    Exoskeletons are what insects have. Endoskeletons are what Terminators and mammals have.

  58. another place to find interesting stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you want to meet new species visit colombia!!!, is great.

  59. Scientists look in new place, find new things! by mveloso · · Score: 2, Funny

    You can't find new stuff when you're sitting behind a desk in a university basement. Seek, and ye shall find!

  60. Teach 'em to fear America: nuke them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hell yeah!

  61. Oblig. Napoleon by stinerman · · Score: 1

    Do the chickens have large talons?

  62. Kinda puts into perspective animals hauling ass... by jerryodom · · Score: 1

    I mean even my girlfriends cat heads for the hills when it sees other people. Not to mention just about every other known critter domesticated or no hauling ass when they see humans. OH NO ITS A HUMAN.....run! run for your life! Looks like the real snakes just got into the garden of Eden. I wonder if that anteater those scientists picked up ended up on a spit by the end of the expedition.

    --
    For some reason I refuse to use either spell check or the spacebar properly.
  63. Well... by jd · · Score: 1
    I guess you could argue that Hulme and Moss Side are probably about as dangerous as Papau New Guinea during an armed riot by berserkers. On the other hand, the Arndale Centre is generally considered safe (well, unless it's being blown up) and there are parts of Salford that don't require viking chainmail armour.


    In terms of type of criminal activity, I'd rate anywhere around the Medlock and between UMIST and Picadilly Circus as about on-par with the worst of Thailand or the Philipines.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  64. Every year, 10,000 new species are discovered by Expert+Determination · · Score: 1

    A field trip in Indonesia that turns up a few dozen is hardly newsworthy.

    --
    "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency," -- Scott McClellan, Whitehouse spokesman.
  65. NOT New Guinea by Mirzabah · · Score: 1

    The headline says "New Guinea" whereas the new species was discovered in an area known either as "West Papua" or "Irian Jaya". New Guinea shares the same island, but is a different country.

  66. So how does the cassowary taste like ? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    ... chicken ? ;) :p

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  67. Isolation by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    While I agree with what you say, evolution on an island happens much quicker than on a continent.

    Therefore we are likely to find life that has evolved much further than life on a continent. Or perhaps it has just evolved differently.

    Either way islands force life to deal with limited resources and adapt, or die and become extinct.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  68. But those attitudes _will_ die, eventually by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    That's because environmentalists ARE wacky people who want to ruin entire industries and send mankind back to the stone age. Perhaps you don't feel that way, and I sympathize with you and other moderates of your movement who simply want reasonable conservation measure. But the "leaders" of the environmentalist movement, the ones getting on TV and running organizations like Greenpeace and PETA and so on, really DO want to eliminate entire industries, free all animals from any human involvement, ban the eating of meat and fish, etc. And so long as you keep supporting such extremeists in order to further your cause, you'll be ridiculed like the crazy whackjobs you are.
    One hundred fifty years ago, people like you were painting abolitionist "wackos" the same way:
    That's because abolitioniasts ARE wacky people who want to ruin entire industries and send mankind back to the stone age. Perhaps you don't feel that way, and I sympathize with you and other moderates of your movement who simply want reasonable slave rights. But the "leaders" of the abolitionist movement, the ones getting in newspapers and running organizations like the underground railroad and so on, really DO want to eliminate entire industries, free all slaves from any servile involvement, ban the slave trade, etc. And so long as you keep supporting such extremeists in order to further your cause, you'll be ridiculed like the crazy whackjobs you are.
    What was "moral" yesterday may not be moral today, and what's "moral" today may not be moral tomorrow.
    There will come a time when people look back on meat-eaters, hunters, etc., in the present day with as much disapproval as we look back on slave-traders and slave-owners of the past.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  69. Do they taste like chicken? by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    So anyone taking bets on how long it will take before these 'hunted to near extinction' mammals will really be extinct?

    Don't be silly. We NEED to go shoot and stuff them, to preserve them for future generations.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  70. Re:Teach 'em to fear America: nuke them! by chawly · · Score: 1

    Sure, but with one of these nice "clean" bombs, eh ? Could perhaps paint it pink. Or even green if you really wanted to be funny. Not to worry - have yourself a really nice day.

    --
    How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  71. Race by quokkapox · · Score: 1
    It is interesting to note that the human race has three primary races -- the mongol, the negro, and the anglo -- and Noah is said to have had three sons, each of which could have had their own dominant genes.

    Sorry, but an absurd claim like this one undermines your credibility.

    Are you aware of the state of modern genetic research into human ancestry? Do you think your claim will hold up in the face of new experiments?

    Race is a joke. Woohoo, we all have lighter or darker skin, facial features, maybe some other minor physiological variations like digestive enzymes adapted to local environment. Whatever.

    Any further distinction is cultural. If you think we're more different than that, you really need to get out and meet more people. We're all pretty much the same.

    Racists piss me off. They are detrimental to our species.

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    1. Re:Race by Khomar · · Score: 1
      Race is a joke. Woohoo, we all have lighter or darker skin, facial features, maybe some other minor physiological variations like digestive enzymes adapted to local environment. Whatever.

      You misunderstand me completely, but I must admit that I was wrong on one point. There are definite races of man based on both genetics and forensic study, but there are five basic races of man, though three are more prominent (what does this mean about my conjecture -- don't know :-) ).

      Any further distinction is cultural. If you think we're more different than that, you really need to get out and meet more people. We're all pretty much the same. Racists piss me off. They are detrimental to our species.

      The distinction is far more than cultural. A foresic scientist can determine the ethnicity of an individual from their skeletal structure -- variations in the proportions of the nose, mouth, skull shape, etc. Murder cases have been solved based on this kind of evidence due to the ethnicity of the victim. It is a fact that there are races of man, but that does not mean that any one of these races is inferior or "less human" than any other.

      Admitting that there are races does not make one racist. Does saying that there are differences between men and women make me sexists? If you say yes, then you are ignoring reality based on your own emotional preferences. Now, if I were to say that men are better than women or that women are somehow inferior to men, then you can rightfully label me sexist.

      In actuality, my beliefs about the origins of man make me absolutely anti-racist. Every human came from the perfect man and woman: Adam and Eve. They were both made in the image of God (Genesis 1:27) with the full genetic potential to create all of the wide varieties of people we see today as well as some that may have perished in the flood. Is this a theory? Yes, and I believe it is an interesting one.

      You say that everyone is pretty much the same, and I would agree. There are far more similarities than differences (afterall, we are all human!), but there are physiological differences. However, even in my conjecture about Noah's sons, they were all brothers. Any racism that occurs basically boils down to sibling rivalry. I also do not believe that we are evolving and therefore improving in any of the races (which would lead to racism) but rather are exhibiting the variations possible within the genetic make-up of humanity. Some people are taller than others. Does that mean that the taller is any more or less human than the shorter? Certainly not. It just means that we are exhibiting different genes. It is the same with the races. There are differences in appearance and certain genes may be more prominent, but it does not allow for discrimination based on race.

      We cannot ignore reality for the sake of politcal correctness, but nor should we abuse reality to demean or discriminate against or for other people. What is needed is a rational understanding of the world we live in, and a deep appreciation for the wonder of who we are as a species. The races of man should not be shunned; that fact should be embraced and enjoyed. I believe it is one of the great wonders of creation -- variety with unity.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!