Slashdot Mirror


Teenager Wins Email Suit Against City of Kokomo

An anonymous reader writes "Recently, a 16 year old sued the city of Kokomo, Indiana for access to an email list that he suspected the mayor was mis-using for political purposes. Despite the mayor's refusal to give in, the teenager won the case. The city will have to pay not only for the expensive attorneys they hired, but may have to compensate the 16 year old's pro-bono counsel."

354 comments

  1. Now you've done it by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can't fight city hall! Or rather, you can fight city hall but the universe will implode if you win. Way to go, I never got to see France.

    --
    Demented But Determined.
    1. Re:Now you've done it by Monkeys!!! · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "Way to go, I never got to see France."

      *shrugs*

      Once you have had one country surrender to you it's all the same.

    2. Re:Now you've done it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to live in Kokomo, this is the shit that happens all the time. chalk one up for the dumbasses.

    3. Re:Now you've done it by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      I disagree. It's ALWAYS funnier when France surrenders.

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    4. Re:Now you've done it by Rufus88 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Way to go, I never got to see France.

      You're welcome.

    5. Re:Now you've done it by EvilGnome13 · · Score: 1

      The line "I never got to see France." is from Pitch Black. I don't know if that's the exact quote though.

  2. Compensate pro bono counsel? by MaelstromX · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Uhhh, am I missing something here? Isn't that an oxymoron? Didn't RTFA.

    1. Re:Compensate pro bono counsel? by Stoopid-Guy0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They were pro-bono with regard to the teenager, so the teen didn't have to pay them. I'm sure they'd still enjoy compensation from someone!

    2. Re:Compensate pro bono counsel? by Secrity · · Score: 2, Informative

      The losing side compensating the winner's pro bono counsel is not an oxymoron. The city's residents, as loser of the lawsuit, now get to pay the kid's lawyer. It doesn't matter that the lawyer wasn't expecting the kid to pay him. What was pro bono to the kid is now an expense to the city. I really hate these cases; the city residents should not be the ones who pay, the mayor should be the one who pays. In actuality it could be the city's insurance company who pays, for now.

    3. Re:Compensate pro bono counsel? by Kookus · · Score: 1

      the city may not have to pay for this, I didn't rtfa and I don't care to, but it looks like he sued an individual who just happened to be the mayor. The money should come out of his pocket if anything.

    4. Re:Compensate pro bono counsel? by Tango42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He sued the City - you only needed to read the title of the summary to see that.

    5. Re:Compensate pro bono counsel? by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      The problem is "pro bono" ("pro bono publico" in full) means for the public good, yet suing the city means you're suing the public (via their representatives, yes, but it's still the public getting sued). Suing the public cannot be for the public good - it doesn't make sense.

      I guess it's a problem of generalisation - the public is not a single entity that you can either benefit or harm, it's a collection of individuals.

    6. Re:Compensate pro bono counsel? by spiritraveller · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He is suing the city because it refused to provide him with the records that he, as a citizen, was entitled to. The mayor's misconduct is just the reason he wanted access to the records, but it is not the basis for his suit.

      The purpose of making one side pay the other's legal fees is to encourage people to settle for a fair amount rather than fight a losing case. If we made an exception for pro bono attorneys, it would encourage an opponent of someone using a pro bono attorney to fight to the very end even if the law was completely against them. It would mean that whenever an attorney took a case pro bono, their client would be at a big disadvantage... and the pro bono attorney could expect to spend a lot of time simply proving to the other side that he is willing to work work work for free just to win a case that would have been settled early if only the losing side wasn't playing games.

    7. Re:Compensate pro bono counsel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking damn right suing the "public" can be good for the public.

      Hey your constitution even suggests going to war against the "public"
      if they threaten your liberties, right?

    8. Re:Compensate pro bono counsel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the citizens of Kokomo are on the ball, they'll file a class action suit against the mayor to hold him personally responsible for costs.

    9. Re:Compensate pro bono counsel? by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

      While my Latin isn't the best, doesn't it seem that since pro bono is the only part that was used, it's just "for good"? No mention of the public there. Adding the "public" in there is kinda putting words in their mouths. Take for instance

      "I received 50 dollars."
      and
      "I received a loan of 50 dollars".

      Slightly different meaning there.

      Also, one could argue that protecting the public from representatives who misuse information made available to them IS for the public good.

      --
      Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
    10. Re:Compensate pro bono counsel? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      via their representatives, yes, but it's still the public getting sued

      Suing the public cannot be for the public good - it doesn't make sense.

      You're missing the point you just made yourself. If the public's representatives are screwing up, then hell yes, suing them is for the public good.

      Where it went wrong is that the city was sued, instead of the officials responsible.

    11. Re:Compensate pro bono counsel? by Secrity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The city was the appropriate entity to sue. The suit was about the city refusing to provide the list of email addresses that the kid wanted in order to investigate something the kid thought the mayor was doing wrong. The mayor may have pushed for the city to fight turning over the list, but the the decision to fight the kid's lawsuit would involve many other people, including the city's attorney. The situation was not as simple as it may seem, the whole decision depended upon whether email address lists have the same privacy protection as physical email lists. I think that this story could easily be spun into a loss of personal privacy.

    12. Re:Compensate pro bono counsel? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Quantum meruit , I think (though I could be wrong).

  3. Pro-Bono Compensation by DamnedNice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As I understand it, Pro-Bono means the lawyer works for free for a case they believe will win them points and get people to like them (the lawyer, that is). How do you compensate a volunteer? Or am I just totally off base here?

    --
    Slackmaster K Proprietor, DamnedNice Blog
    1. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      In this case its more like a bet. If he lost, he got nothing. The boy wouldn't have to pay, no money gained. But if he won, all the lawyers expensives (paralegals, all those billable hours/minutes/seconds) get a value assigned to them, and under the rules of the law, can be paid by the city, which lost. I think.

      Kokomo.. didn't the Eagles sing something about that.. or was that somewhere in hawaii?

    2. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It was the Beach Boys. From the soundtrack for the 1988 movie "Cocktail", starring Tom Cruise.

    3. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the Eagles. Beach Boys actually. Song's called Kokomo.

    4. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably somewhere in Hawaii, as Kokomo, IN is a boil on Indiana's ass.

    5. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by atomicflounder · · Score: 2, Informative

      ahem, beach boys

    6. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What gets me about the compensating-the-teen's-lawyer angle is that apparently the taxpayer's are paying for it.

      Shouldn't -- in a more perfect world -- the people who actually misbehaved pay, not the political entity that they were elected to? Which ultimately means, the taxpayers?

      Now to work. And when I get home, I'll see if the issue is addressed in the actual article, or in posts I haven't read yet. -Eric

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    7. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Nope. The people who misbehaved were elected to their positions by the very same group that will pay more in taxes (or suffer reduced services, two sides of the same coin) as a result of this lawsuit. They do bear some responsibility, and it's going to be very hard to see a situation where the governed demand accountability if they themselves aren't held at least somewhat accountable for the misdeeds of the people they elect.

      Otherwise we'd all feel free to elect Governor Robert Maxwell, who'd have free reign to do whatever the hell he wants, as long as he personally pays the fines. Corrupt government but low taxes, so who cares, right?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    8. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Informative

      Aren't all lawyers required to do x/y cases pro bono as part of their liscence?

      Not that this guy maybe didn't do it purely out of the goodness of his heart anyway, I just think the idea is sweetly nostalgic.

    9. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a disincentive for corruption -- if you get caught scamming, your constituents will have to pay for it; I don't imagine politicians like that (or Tom Delay or Scooter Libby etc) will find themselves back in office any time soon. I'd say the adversarial review aspects of it outweigh the particular financial costs, ultimately.

    10. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incidentally, the American Bar Association also requires a certain amount of pro-bono work for attorneys to maintain their membership (and lawyers are required to have membership to practice).

      IANAL, but my father is and we often discuss such things, as he wants me to go into this field as well.

    11. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Funny

      no

    12. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not at all. Lawyers who do pro-bono work do so of their own free will. It's one of the few professions where so many people give away a huge chunk of their time and money each year. Generally, in the American system (in contradistinction to the English system), attorney's fees are not awardable, even if you win the case (with exceptions for things like Civil Rights cases). I'm not sure how that works in Korea.

      When attorney's fees are awarded, the attorney submits their record of time, usually broken down to the tenth of an hour, as well as expenses. The attorney has a standard billing rate that is then applied. The judge determines if these are reasonable expenses, and, if they are, may award them. Typically that's quite rare.

    13. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe not required, but wikipedia says "Lawyers are recommended under ethical rules to contribute at least fifty hours of pro bono service per year."

      I wonder how "recommended" it really is. I mean, you're recommended to give to the collections in church, but people give you dirty looks if you don't

    14. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by VenomousGecko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In your rush to get the first post you seem to have skipped over the part about READING THE ARTICLE! If you would have taken the time to do so, you would have read that the Howard Circuit Judge Lynn Murray wanted the lawyers work accounted for.

      "Groth took the case on a pro-bono basis, but Murray asked for an accounting of Groth's fees in her ruling. Groth said Tuesday it's likely he could bill several thousand dollars for the case."

      Next time try to do your homework first.

    15. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by dosquatch · · Score: 1

      Of course Pro-Bono. Amateur-Bono can't hit the high notes.

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
    16. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by fleener · · Score: 1

      If you are compensating a volunteer for his time, think like a tax collector. If I volunteer professional services for a nonprofit, I'll take a tax deduction equal to the pay I would have received if I had been originally paid for my time.

    17. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      From TFA: "Groth took the case on a pro-bono basis, but Murray asked for an accounting of Groth's fees in her ruling. Groth said Tuesday it's likely he could bill several thousand dollars for the case."

      He apparently didn't ask for it, so it sounds like it's a little bit of a punitive slap at the city for wasting everyone's time.

      --
      -Styopa
    18. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by cp.tar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I, for one, like the Muppet version better...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    19. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Shanep · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kokomo.. didn't the Eagles sing something about that.. or was that somewhere in hawaii?

      I think that was the Beach Boys. Although I think you're refering to Cocomug, which some of them might be sipping right now in their retirement home.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    20. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Shanep · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder how "recommended" it really is. I mean, you're recommended to give to the collections in church, but people give you dirty looks if you don't

      Especially when you run away with the plate.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    21. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, a hoosier is a boil on Indiana's ass. Kokomo would be more like a cancer - a collection of boils replicating unnecessarily.

    22. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by stevea1210 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Kokomo.. didn't the Eagles sing something about that.. or was that somewhere in hawaii?" Actually it was the Beach Boys that sang the song Kokomo. It is an island in Montego Bay, Jamaica. It is actually owned by Sandals Royal Caribbean.

    23. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Txiasaeia · · Score: 2, Informative
      "I mean, you're recommended to give to the collections in church, but people give you dirty looks if you don't"

      Since we're already off-topic, how do you figure this? Most people I know tithe once a month. You've usually got different ushers passing around the collection plate, so why in the world would somebody give you dirty looks if you've only got a one in four chance of putting anything in the pot per month anyway? I've been an usher, and I tend to avoid looking at people so that they *don't* think that I'm implying anything by my runaway facial expressions.

      But... this is relevant, because... er... oh! Yeah, I've been to a... church in Kokomo. They didn't frown their either when I passed the collection plate by without putting anything in.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    24. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      It is my understanding that you can't deduct volunteer services, only expenses that you incur as a result of those volunteer services. Expenses might be office supplies and mileage (not exactly big ticket items). This site seems to agree with me: http://www.bankrate.com/brm/itax/tips/20010402a.as p

    25. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      My church sends SASEs to your house for tithing. The collections during mass are "special collections" -- IE 9/11, Katrina, the poor, etc.

    26. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by WurdBendur · · Score: 1

      "Kokomo.. didn't the Eagles sing something about that.. or was that somewhere in hawaii?"

      Nobody sings about Indiana.

      --
      SCISNE? ANUS SIMIAE!
    27. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by HardCase · · Score: 1

      If I volunteer professional services for a nonprofit, I'll take a tax deduction equal to the pay I would have received if I had been originally paid for my time.

      Better hope that you don't get audited. That deduction is specifically not allowed by the IRS.

      -h-

    28. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      wouldn't a Purdue student be a boil in Indiana?

    29. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      You discuss religious donation methodology with most people you know? That's weird. Or maybe it's weird that no one's ever discussed it with me. Eh, something's weird here, either way.

    30. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Heck, they get all cranky when you make change for that $20, too. :)

    31. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      If I say I hate U2, would that mean I'm Anti-Bono, or Pro-Plant?

    32. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      The lawyer did offer to work for free. But I'm sure he doesn't only take pro-bono cases. In this particular case, the judge was so annoyed that the city wasted time fighting the suit that she included that the lawyer be compensated at his normal rate.

    33. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by pizzaman100 · · Score: 1
    34. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, the American Bar Association also requires a certain amount of pro-bono work for attorneys to maintain their membership (and lawyers are required to have membership to practice).

      Lawyers are required to be on the competent bar for their jurisdiction, at least in most jurisdictions (I've been told that exceptions exist, but don't know for sure). They are most certainly not required to be ABA members.

      IANAL, but my father is and we often discuss such things, as he wants me to go into this field as well.

      If you decide to go into law, listening carefully will go a long way. Mine's an attorney, too, and I'm also thinking about law; dad's on the Oklahoma Bar, and inactive--but still a member of--the Ohio Bar. He lives in Ohio, but practices for the Federal government (Department of the Air Force). He's not a member of the ABA, and has neither the desire nor the intent to join.
      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    35. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      Can I be Anti-Plant but Pro-Zep?

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    36. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      Kokomo.. didn't the Eagles sing something about that.. or was that somewhere in hawaii?

      It was the Beach Boys.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    37. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by CoachS · · Score: 1

      Actually what you're referring to is taking the case on "contingency" -- which means the lawyer gets paid a percentage of the winnings. (and if there are no winnings then there is no fee).

      Pro Bono (short for Pro Bono Publico; latin for "For the Common Good") means without compensation.

      In this case it may be that the court thinks the city's behavior was so reprehensible that the city should have to reimburse the pro bono counsel for any expenses they may have incurred. Not likely that they'll get any legal fees but they might get costs. (postage, filing fees, etc.)

      -Coach-

      --
      Perhaps the world's greatest tragedy is that ignorance is not impotence.
    38. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      but wikipedia says "Lawyers are recommended under ethical rules to contribute at least fifty hours of pro bono service per year."

      Thats one of those things where you can't take wikipedia seriously. Lawyers all follow different guidelines, in the US alone, there are many different bar associations and as far as I know, pro bono work is optional under all of them. Certain individual law firms might make their lawyers do so much pro bono work, but that is far from saying that all lawyers are required to do so.

    39. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by fleener · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I wonder if I was thinking of my state's tax system. I can't find any reference to the issue in that realm though. But to answer the lingering question, I've never tried to take that deduction. No use complicating life by going beyond the EZ form.

    40. Re:Pro-Bono Compensation by ZhangFei · · Score: 1
  4. Hoosier politics 101 by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 4, Informative

    Much worse misusing of lists has occurred in Indiana. Before the national "do not call list" was implemented Indiana had one. Charitable organizations did not have to oblige by this list. But the FOP took it one step further, adding all the names on the "do not call list" to their call list. This undoubtedly led to them getting more than a few unlisted numbers in the process.

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
    1. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 1

      That explains a lot... like why my unwanted phone calls about tripled *after* I registered my phone number with the DNC call. Sometimes I wish could ditch my phone entirely!

      --

      Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
    2. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by MacBrave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So that why I still get those dang FOP solicitation calls every year. I wonder how the FOP got the no-call list from the state anyway, since they didn't have to follow it in the first place?

    3. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by sampspoon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I live in Indiana...The FOP thing is really bad. They call you and they have a list of the people that live in the house and will address the caller by their first name. The telemarketers stance themselves so it sounds like they're the actual cops rather than the FOP. They state they're with the and blah blah blah. It's real close to extorsion.

    4. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      How on earth is it extorsion (sic)? Extortion is when a person obtains goods/services from another by wrongfully threatening or inflicting harm to his person, reputation, or property. At best it's harrasment.

      I'm not defending the FOP. Between them and PHV (Paralyized Hoosier Veterans), the two of them make up the majority of telemarking calls my house gets as well as my parents. But saying the are extorting money, or even coming close, it a little excessive.

    5. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Extortion is when a person obtains goods/services from another by wrongfully threatening or inflicting harm to his person, reputation, or property.

      Wikipedia with the assist!

      Incidentally, it also lists "coercion by threat" as a definition. The mere pretension of being a Figure of Authority might be enough to swing that, if the judge was on crack, maybe. It's kinda like the grey area where a police officer saying "sir, please let me take a look inside the vehicle" is technically an innoculous request and not a command.

    6. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by DamnedNice · · Score: 1

      You can have your cake and eat it too. Nobody's allowed to wardial cell phones. Not charities, not polls, not surveys; nobody. Except collection agencies, and it's easy enough to give them a bad number.

      --
      Slackmaster K Proprietor, DamnedNice Blog
    7. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by kyofunikushimi · · Score: 1

      For what it is worth, I've discovered that asking the FOP Caller to send you a packet of information so you can make your decision based on that pretty much ends all the pain. They thank you and hang up. A couple weeks later you get the packet of info... which sometimes even contains the coveted FOP sticker!

      --
      oo
    8. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by Mayhem178 · · Score: 0

      No kidding, we've got the worst kind of police bribery here...legalized bribery. You give the state cops some money, you get this little sticker and put it on your license plate. They see the sticker and cut you some slack, even if you're breaking the law. What kind of lazy ass police force do we have? It's like paying for your citation in advance...why the hell would you do something like that? And what's worse is now they crack down on people without the sticker. I've had friends get pulled over for doing less that 5 mph over, just cause they didn't pay the FOP's "asshole" tax. That's 100% pure grade A All-American BS.

      Between that and the (supposedly) recently repealed citation "quota" and, of course, the DNC list fiasco, Indiana has been a real hell hole to live in for the past few years. Though having moved to the Indianapolis area, it hasn't been nearly as bad as up around Chicago, where I'm from.

      Mostly when I got telemarketers or FOP, I just told them I was dead. Or that I was dead, but I'd be back in a few hours if they wanted try back then.

      --

      "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    9. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      It happens all the time. I've been a state employee in two different states, and in both states, my state email addresses mysteriously ended up on the mailing lists of the Governor, several members of his party, and the state secretary of education.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 2, Funny

      FOP? I'm a Dapper Dan man, dammit!

    11. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a Wikipedia, it was Google definition:...which got it from Wikipedia. :)

      I've received numerous calls by FOP. I've never feeled "threatened" by them, no more then what I might be by a commission appliance salesman at Sears. Telemarketers (or in this case telefundraisers) are salesman. They get paid if they "sell" something...so obviously they are going to lean on you a little to make the "sale".

    12. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Well in Wisconsin charitable organizations dont have to oblige to the DNC list either.... However charities have long ago realized "we better not call these people unless we have a reason (they were a previous contributor etc) or they will be more than pissed at us" Basically they could call, they choose not to because it makes them look really bad.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    13. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by jasen666 · · Score: 1

      No, not even collection agencies. Although they'd love for you to beleive that.
      A collection agency cannot do anything that could incur a consumer any kind of costs in the pursuit of collecting a debt.
      Calling a cell phone can cost the consumer real money.
      If they call a cell phone, and the owner tells them it's a cell phone, and tells them to stop, they'll be breaking the law if they call it back again. It's the same as if they tried to make a collect call to you. Then they would also be open to a lawsuit by the consumer under FDCPA violations to the tune of $1000 + actual damages incurred. Actually, even if you tell them that it's "inconvenient" to call you at this number at any time, they must stop calling that number.
      Original creditors (someone you have or had an open account with) are exempt from this law, as it only applies to collection agencies.

    14. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by J3M · · Score: 1

      I have many close friends who work in law enforcement, from state, local and county (in Indiana). All of them have told me that those FOP stickers mean nothing to them. Likewise with the little FOP associate member tags that you attach to your license plate. Actually, several of them have told me that with the exception of senior citizen's, most people with those stickers or tags get them because they are speeders or have something to hide (like routine DUI people) and thus watched more closely.

      --
      Aych tea tea pea colon slash slash slash dot dot org slash
    15. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of the Indiana Fraternal Order of Police, can someone get them to stop calling my apartment. They've called four times in the past week alone, despite my constantly refusing to give them money. They almost make it seem like it's a donation for my own protection.

      As an aside, my number has been listed under a fake name since I moved to the state, yet they still somehow know it and call me by my real name. Any thoughts?

    16. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by DamnedNice · · Score: 1

      I'll have to remember that; I have about a dozen different OCA's calling my cell number. Though that's the number on all those bad checks I wrote... :)

      --
      Slackmaster K Proprietor, DamnedNice Blog
    17. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to Indiana on a number of occasions (had a friend going to Purdue that I visited a few times, plus some other trips I took.) I'll agree with you, Indiana is a hellhole. Although I have not been to Indianapolis yet, so I don't know if it's much better. I imagine the hick factor would be far less. Basically, I'm from Milwaukee which is famous for having a bar on every corner. Urban areas in Northern Indiana (Gary and surrounding areas) seem to be like that, except it's a liquor store on every corner. Because in Gary, you drink alone.

      Good life got you down? Try Gary.

    18. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by Mayhem178 · · Score: 0

      I guess that makes sense, but that's certainly not the vibe anyone I know gets, nor have I witnessed such firsthand. Then again, it haven't really seen it come into play between Terre Haute (where I went to college) and Indy (where I live now). In fact, you really gotta be doing something incredibly stupid to get pulled over on I-70, I-74, I-65, or I-69 (i.e. >= 100 mph). And don't even get me started on I-465 around the city...I don't think they stop anyone on there unless they're committing a felony or something. I figure, just don't break the law, and you won't have to worry about it.

      most people with those stickers or tags get them because they are speeders or have something to hide (like routine DUI people) and thus watched more closely

      Furthering the proof that there's no good reason to get them. :) So anyways, what were we talkin' about? Oh, yeah, telemarketers. They suck.

      --

      "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    19. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Basically, I'm from Milwaukee which is famous for having a bar on every corner."

      You need to go south to Kenosha, the bar situation is even worse there. You can even go to the drive through liquor store there so you don't have to stagger out of your car. I used to commute to work there and most of my coworkers who lived there would be at the bars every night or at least a couple times a week. Then they would go on to complain that there was nothing to do around there. Maybe if they could pry themselves off that bar stool, businesses and organizations offering them fun alternatives could afford to stay in business.

    20. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      It's kinda like the grey area where a police officer saying "sir, please let me take a look inside the vehicle" is technically an innoculous request and not a command.

      That's not a grey area, it's deception, pure and simple. The Cop is soliciting permission to search your car, but implying that you have to comply. The correct answer is always 'No'.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    21. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      I scared a telemarketer back in the mid-nineties when he called by answering "Hello??!? My goodness who is this?? This is a computer modem telephone line! You can't call this line!!"

    22. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      How is it deception?

      The officer has the right to ask, you have the right to say no.

    23. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by jacoberrol · · Score: 1

      You're right. My fiancee's dad is a retired cop and her FOP sticker does not get her out of tickets. Getting pulled over by her dad's buddy, now that's a different story. By the way, your sig is lame.

    24. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      How is it deception?

      He's using his position of authority and word choice to imply that it isn't a request. Did you even read my post?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    25. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Yes, you have the right to refuse, at which point they have probable cause, so they will arrest you and look inside your trunk.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    26. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The officer has the right to ask, you have the right to say no.

      Some things the officer says you must do, or he will pull the gun. Some things you can decline. But the gun and threat of violence are always there.

    27. Re:Hoosier politics 101 by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      so they will arrest you and look inside your trunk.

      And after they get done with that, they'll search your vehicle. ;^)

  5. A better headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My suggestion for a better headline: "American discovers balls"

    Now if only the rest of the country could get around to holding their political leaders accountable for their misdeeds.

    1. Re:A better headline... by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Obligatory vaguely-related geek reference...

    2. Re:A better headline... by RoboSpork · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, interesting. I think you are right because clearly the USA is the only politically corrupt country in the world.

      Lets face the facts, corruption is a human problem, not an American one.

    3. Re:A better headline... by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      Because clearly if its a common problem and perhaps even a part of human nature we should ignore it and let it fester and consume whatever it can?

    4. Re:A better headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? Well if some chinese dude did it, then it would have been "Chinese person discovers balls" But an American did it, so the suggested title is factually correct.

    5. Re:A better headline... by achbed · · Score: 1

      Yes, but being apathetic about public corruption is a modern American pastime!

    6. Re:A better headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did he say forget it? It seems more that you are forgetting about the rest of the world while you hate us.

    7. Re:A better headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were possible to hold government accountable over the long run, then the US government could not have been able to expand (not only in revenue but power over the people) nearly every year as it has for the past ~150 years. The US government of today dwarfs the US government of only 50 years ago, in nearly every single aspect (especially power over the people).

      (There is no way that such a near-exponential expansion of government power came "by the will of the people".)

  6. Beyond the knee-jerk reaction by Tx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Beyond the knee-jerk reaction, which would be "yay for the student, and peoples rights" in my case, I kind of think the city has a point, even if it isn't justified in law. I certainly don't want government institiutions making it easy for people to get such lists out of them, although it should be possible.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
    1. Re:Beyond the knee-jerk reaction by Tx · · Score: 1

      Oops, where's that preview button :). I meant

      I certainly don't want government institiutions making it easy for people to get such lists out of them, although it should be possible.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    2. Re:Beyond the knee-jerk reaction by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      I agree. I would actually have to side with the city on this one, they were pretty correct in wanting to keep e-mail adresses hidden. Consider a spammer taking this case as a precedent and going all over the country(or state,depending) collecting e-mail adresses. Many of those adresses will probably not be on a do-not-call list (why add an address on which you receive no spam?) so this hypothethical person could be sitting on a veritable gold mine, pawning it of to other spammers for big bucks.

      Hmm, come to think of it...

    3. Re:Beyond the knee-jerk reaction by packeteer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think nearly everyone who reads into this case will agree with you. Remember when a judge makes a ruling they do not say what is "right" and what is "wrong". In this case the judge simply said that the law did nto cover email address' and if anyone wanted it to they would need to get the legislature to pass a law about it.

      I side with the city here but the judge is not out of line making the ruling that was handed down. This is just more evidence of how behind the times our laws are and this is one possible way for spammers and scammers to exploit that.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    4. Re:Beyond the knee-jerk reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [OT, but can't resist]

      >unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount;fsck;more;yes;unmo u nt;sleep

      Error in line 1; unexpected "unmount" after "yes"

    5. Re:Beyond the knee-jerk reaction by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1
      I certainly don't want government institiutions making it easy for people to get such lists out of them, although it should be possible.

      And that's exactly what this case was about. Nees believes that the mayor had done just that: used a list of people subscribing to a city newsletter as his own political spam list. There's no way to prove it without comparing the lists. So, Nees asked for the lists.

      I agree with what you're saying, and hopefully the legislature will plug that hole. However, that means the mayor doesn't get the list, either.

    6. Re:Beyond the knee-jerk reaction by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I agree completely.

      I really think that this case is more of a failure for privacy rights. I'm not sure that I like the idea that anyone can go in and get a printout of an electronic email list, but isn't allowed to do the same for physical addresses, even though they're far more likely to spam my email (since it doesn't cost them a thing).

      I hope when they give the kid the email addresses, they establish guidelines mandating that all email addresses must be given out in hardcopy, and set it in some really obnoxious and impossible-to-OCR font. Some of those "olde English" scripts at about 6 points ought to do the trick, preferably printed on toilet paper.

      I appreciate what the guy was trying to do -- show whether there was misuse of the list within the government itself -- but I'm not sure that I really like the fact that it established precedent that there's basically no protection of email address lists from public dissemination.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    7. Re:Beyond the knee-jerk reaction by packeteer · · Score: 1

      about 1/10 replies to my comment is about this, its simply the anti page widening troll code. Any string of charecters gets a space added every so often. This is why if you link a URL its almost always broken.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  7. Re:Pro-bono by brunes69 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone who is forced to be pro-Bono should be compensated.

    I mean... what's with wearing the sunglasses indoors? So pretentious!

  8. Re:Pro-bono by dzurn · · Score: 3, Informative
    From TFA:

    Groth [teen's counsel] took the case on a pro-bono basis, but [District Judge] Murray asked for an accounting of Groth's fees in her ruling. Groth said Tuesday it's likely he could bill several thousand dollars for the case.
    Judge thought that the lawyer deserved some conpensation, so asked the lawyer how much he worked on the case. Sounds fair to me.
  9. what's so good about this? by F�an�ro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So he successfully sued the city to give him the email adresses of all people that are on some city mailing list?

    So any Spammer can now just request these lists to get free verified addresses?

    How is that in the public interest? What laws are the basis for this?

    1. Re:what's so good about this? by BadanTheUgly · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's good because he wanted to compare this list with the list of people who were receiving political emails (propoganda) from the mayor.
      It's bad enough being spammed by freemarketeers trying to sell you Viagra, but at least there's a certain honesty about them. They're in it to make money, pure and simple.
      Who wants political spam? Ordinary spam is a waste of time and resources, but is unlikely to result in electoral corruption.
      Elected officials should
      A. Know better and
      B. Not spend taxpayers' money to further their political cause.

    2. Re:what's so good about this? by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's the 'You can't have it both ways' principle at work. Things like the Freedom of Information Act force a degree of transparency upon the government. Limiting this access to prevent abuse would have more adverse consequences than the abuse itself.

      In this case, the public interest seems obvious to me: did the city abuse a general-purpose/nonpolitical mailing list to send political/partisan mail? I, for one, would not welcome the local overlords spamming me when I'm not a member of their party.

    3. Re:what's so good about this? by blueg3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The laws that are the basis for this are evident in the article. It's an issue of public record. In the interests of the people, many government documents are public record. Mailing addresses are protected to prevent abuse, but e-mail addresses are not. More than likely, they should be, just like mailing addresses. However, it's not really the place of the courts to say, "Well, this *should* be protected, but it isn't, so we'll rule as if it is."

      So the case they're faced with is that someone asked for a copy of a public record and the city tried to make it difficult with the intent of preventing the person from obtaining the list. They didn't tell him he had to hand-copy it because they didn't have it in electronic form. They did it with the intent of making it unreasonably difficult to acquire a copy of the list, which directly opposes the spirit of the law regarding public record.

      The appropriate step is legislative. Extend to e-mail addresses the same protections as mailing addresses.

    4. Re:what's so good about this? by InsaneGeek · · Score: 1
      From what I can tell from the article the offered to give him access to the list, but that we was not allowed to electronically copy it (only had write). One might argue that they did not give him an easy(or possibly reasonably feasible) way to compare the article, but I can see the point the city was making. If he had visible access to the list I think he should be able to take a representative sample and compare it without having to write down every single one.

      He expressed concern the mayor might be using the newsletter subscriber list as a target audience for his political mailings, a charge the mayor has denied.

      City officials turned down Nees, saying the teen could come in and hand-copy the list. Officials said giving out copies of address lists would leave the newsletter subscribers open to spam and computer viruses.
    5. Re:what's so good about this? by F�an�ro · · Score: 1

      Sure, the mayor should not spam.
      But when he spams, who cares whether he got the list from the city, or from some address dealer who in turn got it for free from the city.

      After all, as this case shows, the city has to give out the list to anyone who asks.

      - If the mayor sent unsolicited mail to peolpe, then he is a spammer,
      - it should be easy to verify whether the recipents have opted in to him,
      - if they have not, then get his ass!

      (On a side note, what did you do to get a 0 starting score?)

    6. Re:what's so good about this? by F�an�ro · · Score: 1

      So the next time the mayor can just get these addresse from some address dealer who in turn can get them for free from the city after this judgement.
      Maybe that's what he has done anyway: get some dealer to "hand-copy" the addresses for him, whit plausible deniability as part of the deal, it's what I would do to cover my ass.

      Spamming is bad, but what does it matter where the adresses came from?

    7. Re:what's so good about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They think this is good because everyone on /. just assumes the Mayor is guilty. Oh it was a teenager fighting the case, so he must be right. Government is big and bad and evil. So its ok to give spammers all the citizens' email addresses.

      BTW, heres a less expensive way to test the mailing list theory that kid could have done. Make yahoo account. Join city mailing list. Wait to see if any mail from other lists comes in. Simple, no?

    8. Re:what's so good about this? by Surt · · Score: 1

      They're called public records, and one of the most vital principles of democracy is access to the records of your government. Would you like the government to be able to maintain secret lists of people they plan to exterminate? Besides, spam filters are so good now, who worries about spam any more? When spam was a problem I was receiving maybe 800-900 spams/day in my inbox, today that's down to one a week. But either way spam worries are not a good reason to give up important features of our democracy.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    9. Re:what's so good about this? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Would you like the government to be able to maintain secret lists of people they plan to exterminate?

      This is just stupid. Would anyone like anyone to maintain any lists of people they want to exterminate, secret or open?

    10. Re:what's so good about this? by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1
      Spam is still a problem. Even if it's all being filtered at your ISP so you don't have to download it, you're still paying for all the bandwidth used, the machines used to filter the spam, the staff time used to configure them (and make sure there are no false positives) - and so on. This is from the perspective of someone who spends more time tweaking Spamassassin at work than he really would like, BTW.

      If it's not being filtered at your ISP, then it's slowing down your connection just downloading the stuff. If you've got infinite bandwidth, please let me know if your ISP offers connections in the UK :)

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    11. Re:what's so good about this? by sjames · · Score: 1

      How is that in the public interest? What laws are the basis for this?

      The problem is that many freedoms and rights can have both good and bad uses.

      The good use here is that now Nees has what he needs to prove that McKillip is, in fact, one of those spammers who has been mis-using the city's email newsletter list to feed hist own personal list for political spam. (That is, one spammer has already grabbed a copy.

      Unfortunatly, the law is not currently adequate to limit the information release to appropriate purposes without abuses.

      What they need there is another law that use of e-mail addresses derived from public data costs one million dollars per address per use AND actually make an effort to enforce it.

    12. Re:what's so good about this? by Stalky · · Score: 1
      The laws that are the basis for this are evident in the article. It's an issue of public record. In the interests of the people, many government documents are public record. Mailing addresses are protected to prevent abuse, but e-mail addresses are not. More than likely, they should be, just like mailing addresses. However, it's not really the place of the courts to say, "Well, this *should* be protected, but it isn't, so we'll rule as if it is."

      I think I understand.

      You mean it's like the way the First Amendment, which protects "free speech" and "freedom of the press", would be the basis for a court ruling that Congress can, in fact, pass a law prohibiting us from freely expressing ourselves online, because that expression is neither spoken nor printed on paper.

      --
      Jeff
    13. Re:what's so good about this? by F�an�ro · · Score: 1

      The good use here is that now Nees has what he needs to prove that McKillip is, in fact, one of those spammers who has been mis-using the city's email newsletter list to feed hist own personal list for political spam. (That is, one spammer has already grabbed a copy.


      It seems that he actually proved the exact opposite:
      Anyone can go and grab this list (althought until now only copy it by hand, not electronically)

      So the mayor can just claim that
      - he got the list from some "associate" that assured him the list contains only adresses that have opted in to receive politcal spam,
      - or that some evil dude must have taken the list, and submitted every address from it into the mayors politcal-spam-opt-in-form, just to discredit him.

    14. Re:what's so good about this? by Eil · · Score: 1

      When your entire livelihood rests on getting a handful of responses out of millions of emails sent, there's not much incentive to expend the time and money it would take to physically trek around to different cities and ask for a few thousand email addresses from each. Not when they can get many times more that number by running a harvester on the web for a few hours or by buying a truckload of addresses from another spammer.

      Besides, I'd wager that 98% of those addresses probably are already on several spamlists.

    15. Re:what's so good about this? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I thought the OP had to be crazy to want that, but I thought maybe he just hadn't thought of it.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    16. Re:what's so good about this? by Surt · · Score: 1

      That's certainly all true. My point was that spam is not a problem for the end user anymore, and that is who would be impacted by the release of these email addresses. I doubt if the bandwidth suck of releasing these email addresses would be measurable against the noise.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    17. Re:what's so good about this? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly, the law is not currently adequate to limit the information release to appropriate purposes without abuses.

      The big problem being, one person's "appropriate use" is another person's "abuse". Not an easy problem to solve.

    18. Re:what's so good about this? by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      Good point. Scary.

      Maybe we should unbury the Constitution and start acting like it exists (adding, modifying, removing). Just like the good ol' days.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    19. Re:what's so good about this? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yes, let's not allow for rights that might get misused. Good thinking.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    20. Re:what's so good about this? by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      You seem to have been the only person here to read the article and understand it. This isn't about 'Yay for kids, down with right wing politicians' or even 'Information must be Free', but is really about does the established protection of addresses in the posession of a municipality extend to 'email addresses.'

      I would say it does and that the judge should have had the competency to see that. An address is an address. Does the law not protect PO Boxes and only actual street adresses? If you filed your tax return electronically, is the email address on record not protected?

      The underlying issue is about improper use of the email list for political purposes. This is a case for the district attorney and he would be able to access and compare the email lists and determine if he wanted to bring a case. It's not a matter of access to 'email' addresses.

    21. Re:what's so good about this? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      That depends on your interpretation of the phrase "freedom of speech". Perhaps you're confusing freedom of the press with the freedom to express yourself in a written manner, and extending that to imply that freedom of speech is to be interpreted as spoken expression. I suppose in theory judges could rule in such a way if they changed the current interpretation of "freedom of speech", but it's not like it's an unwritten interpretation -- there are many case rulings clarifying it -- so they would have to go against precedent and popular opinion to rule so.

      On the other hand, a law that protects mailing addresses is more likely rather more specific than the First Amendment. Often inclusion of specific cases implies exclusion of other things. If I make a law barring horses from roaming the streets, this is not to be interpreted as also barring cows. A law against livestock would bar both, but would it cover tigers, which are not livestock?

    22. Re:what's so good about this? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      You're making dangerous assumptions by thinking that a judge is incompetent to rule otherwise. A lot has to be taken into account. If the law specifically says that mailing addresses are protected from access, why would something that is not a mailing address be protected? An e-mail address is substantially different. They seem similar in this case, both ways of sending you junk mail, but was that the intent of the law? After all, if you have someone's mailing address, you can find them physically. With their e-mail address, you cannot. In addition, a list of mailing addresses can be compiled without your consent (who lives where is a matter of city record), but a list of e-mail addresses might be opt-in.

      Things like when the law is written have to be taken into account, and as far as I know, neither of us have that information. If the law protecting mailing addresses was written recently and it says "mailing addresses", who in their right mind would extend this to e-mail addresses? Clearly the lawmakers must have known about the existance of e-mail.

      You would equally hear complaints if laws preventing access to some things that were normally be public record were extended beyond the materials explicitly mentioned in the law. Who is a judge to say that people should not be allowed to access public records, if the legislators did not say so? Isn't that "legislating from the bench"?

      This is a matter for the legislators of that area. If they want e-mail addresses lists to be removed from public record, amend the law to state so.

  10. I wonder by cosmotron · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if this is enough of a joy for the Beach Boys to sing about it?

    --
    Ryan - http://www.thecosmotron.com/
  11. I guess he doesn't have a car... by thedletterman · · Score: 1

    I'm missing something here, why couldn't this kid go down to the city council offices or whatever and look at their paper printout of the two mailing lists side-by-side, and draw his comparisions and conclusions on the spot? Regardless, this is a serious yawn. The spammer that gets this mailing list tomorrow will make more money than the lawyers on both sides. Yay!

    --
    Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:I guess he doesn't have a car... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Reading from the article, it seems the judge only sided on the side of the teen because of the definition of "address" not including e-mail addresses. But what if an e-mail address includes part of the snail-mail address?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  12. Why the City Sued by linuxdoctor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The plaintiff Nees, said, "I don't see why they spent all of that time and money when they knew it would be in vain. They knew the law wasn't on their side, yet they continued to fight."

    Ask Microsoft. They are constantly suing and being sued regardless of their guilt or innocence or even the law. They have all the money and the people suing them usually don't. They can hold out for years until their opponent's money runs out. If they lose in court, they simply appeal and in the end, when and if an appeal goes against them, they simply ignore it. Then the whole process starts all over again. Meanwhile, they keep raking in their ill gotten gains.

    I guess the Kokomo mayor thought he might be able to bluff his way through this one. In the end, he probably decided that the political fallout from not complying with the law or appealing the court's decision would be too great. A politician's thinking process is unlike that of a kleptocrat's, errr I mean executives of a major corporation. The executive worries only about money. The politician worries about votes.

  13. Typical of this town by kanwisch · · Score: 3, Informative

    To anyone who lives in or near Kokomo, this type of continuance in the face of facts is not surprising. I suspect the mayor had hoped the kid would give up.

    His loss is a community loss in tax dollars, which, when considering that Delphi Automotive, one of the city's two largest corporations is in bankruptcy is quite irresponsible.

  14. Bermuda, Bahama, come on pretty mama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The beach boys sang about Kokomo Island, not about Kokomo, Indiana.

  15. Kokomo Resident by reidhoch · · Score: 5, Informative

    First off, please don't /. my local newspaper. Secondly this is only one of Matt McKillip's blunders. He has commented how he thinks divorce should be illegal in the city of Kokomo, had a "prayer chapel" installed in a Redi-Med type medical center to prevent a bar from being turned into a strip club, given top jobs to campaign contibutors, changed traditionally public meetings to invite only, etc ...

    Really, he is the worst mayor we have had here for quite a while. Delphi and Chrysler, Kokomo's top employers have both recently laid off people. Kokomo is on a downfall and MAtt McKillip isn't helping it.

    1. Re:Kokomo Resident by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Those revelations will only come as a suprise to those who do not live in or near kokomo. Having lived in the state of Indiana for a few years longer than I would have liked, I cant see anything here that the local populace wouldnt VOLUNTARILY elect into a public office. The 'small town' life has many, MANY, many dark secrets to it. As far as I can see, this mayor is simply a mirror of the populace he represents.

      Piece of advice, MOVE! Until you remove yourself from that atmosphere for an extended amount of time, you wont understand how much it is dragging you down.

    2. Re:Kokomo Resident by KingNaught · · Score: 1

      Stupid, Currupt, Hyper Evengelical Mayor, Now I have a reason besides all the damn stop lights not to go to Kokomo. Of course the town could be governed by the bastard child of Pope Benedict & Goerge Bush and I'd still go there for the Hip Hugger.

    3. Re:Kokomo Resident by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

      Sounds like he's right in line with our national leadership. Sadly, I'm not attempting sarcasm here. :(

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    4. Re:Kokomo Resident by Billosaur · · Score: 1
      First off, please don't /. my local newspaper.

      Oh but why not! Why shouldn't the Kokomo Tribune's servers tremble with the power of thousands of outraged geeks?

      Secondly this is only one of Matt McKillip's blunders. He has commented how he thinks divorce should be illegal in the city of Kokomo, had a "prayer chapel" installed in a Redi-Med type medical center to prevent a bar from being turned into a strip club, given top jobs to campaign contibutors, changed traditionally public meetings to invite only, etc ...

      When's the next mayoral election? Because it sounds like this kid has opened the right can of worms to help shuffle your apparently befuddled mayor out on a rail.

      Really, he is the worst mayor we have had here for quite a while. Delphi and Chrysler, Kokomo's top employers have both recently laid off people. Kokomo is on a downfall and MAtt McKillip isn't helping it.

      Time to go on the offensive if this guy is such an idiot... impeach him if the election is too far away. And find out who voted for him in the first place and give them all atomic wedgies. Politics calls for simple solutions.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    5. Re:Kokomo Resident by reidhoch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I left Kokomo for 4 years, only moving back to be near family. Most of Kokomo's residents are happy with things because they know nothing else. They just want to graduate high school and get a job at a factory, they really have no aspirations or dreams. Church on Sunday, Work on Monday thru Friday, rinse, repeat.

    6. Re:Kokomo Resident by 955301 · · Score: 1

      So... You've submitted all of the details that are factual to Wikipedia, right?

      I'd really hate to see this guy go any further if he's in the business of pushing morals on others, then turning around and misusing information about his constituents.

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    7. Re:Kokomo Resident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow! So let me get this straight. Trying to protect the citizens is something to attack the mayor on, right?

      First of all, the prayer chapel had been there when the medical facilities was opened. It is part of a Catholic owned hospital chain. Two, there are two other churches within reach.

      He is trying to promote family instead of a "get married, if it doesn't work out, who cares?" attitude, since the divorce rate in Kokomo is approx. 50%.

      The public meetings? He did so in accordance to law. Those meetings were suppose to be closed.

      Maybe those "top campaign" contributers are the most qualified? Oh, and EVERY policitian does that. To take it one step further though, he went through interview processes. He called individuals he trusted for adivce, including my father who is NOT a political figure and who is not wealthy and/or a major campaign contributor. He even asked him if he would like to apply for a position because Mr. McKillip felt he would be appropriate for the position.

      The city did not sue. Mr. Nees sued the city. The city had no choice but to go to court.

      Now...as far as being the worst mayor. He saved the tax payers $50 mill is first year in office, correct? I also had a top official tell me from before the Mayor even considered running for political office, "If I would have known what shape this city was in when I took this job, I would have brought my coloring books and crayons to the office." That pretty well tells the state of the city before Mr. McKillip was in office.

      As for the list, Mr. Nees cannot verify that the list is separate from his campaign list. First, Mr. McKillip does keep two lists. Yes, the addresses on the campaign list are on the city list, but NOT vice versa. I receive two mailings from Mr. McKillip: one from his campaign email that has to do with non-city business and one from the city that has to do with city business. It has been this way since he was in office. Mr. McKillip does not have to give out the campaign list. So how Mr. Nees can compare the two, I'd like to know.

      Now, on a personal note. I use to work for Mr. McKillip. He has always been honest and straight forward. Those that accuse him of lying, obviously do not know him. He is has always been willing to give the information that is necessary. He has always taken care of all of his employees beyond what was necessary. In no other job did I receive as much respect, encouragement, and support from my boss. To say that he is a liar, is saying that the office corrupted him. I can still email him and call him and he is always straight up with me. Granted, there are things that he cannot say until the appropriate time, but that does not make him a liar.

      So all that being said, yes, he is a human. He does make mistakes. He won't be able to make the popular decision all the time. That is part of being a political figure. Unfortunately, people are unwilling to seek out the truth. It is always the other guys fault.

      Maybe he is the worst mayor in Kokomo's history. Maybe he is too honest to be a politician. Maybe he shouldn't put the public first. Take the time to know someone before attacking that person. You might be surprised at what you find...

    8. Re:Kokomo Resident by trybywrench · · Score: 1

      The 'small town' life has many, MANY, many dark secrets to it

      That's a good point, i spent all of high school in a town with less then 1000 people. There's this mentality that small towns are all "church and apple pie" but that is far from the truth. Now I live in downtown Dallas and will never ever go back to my hometown.

      --
      I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    9. Re:Kokomo Resident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean to tell me that Kokomo -isn't- the place you wanna go to get away from it all?

      I couldn't really picture there being a whole lot of tropical beaches in Indiana anyway.

    10. Re:Kokomo Resident by Quintios · · Score: 1

      I guess if that's true that he's so bad he won't get re-elected! Yay voters! But then, if the majority likes what he's doing then he might just stick around. Yay voters! :)

      --
      Anonymous Cowards are at -6...
    11. Re:Kokomo Resident by virg_mattes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow, you're not much of a spin doctor. I know nothing of the city nor of the state of affairs there, and your argument still reads like it's BS put out by someone who's trying to protect McKillip. Let's take just the first few points:

      > Wow! So let me get this straight. Trying to protect the citizens is something to attack the mayor on, right?

      You'll have a hard time convincing anyone here that offering a list for hand-copying but not in a more suitable format is "trying to protect the citizens" and not "trying to make the investigation so painful that it'll go away." Moreover, once it became clear that the law wasn't going to support him directly, capituating would be more in the interests of his constiuency than fighting to the bitter and very expensive end.

      > He is trying to promote family instead of a "get married, if it doesn't work out, who cares?" attitude, since the divorce rate in Kokomo is approx. 50%.

      Firstly, the divorce rate nationwide is around 50 percent, and secondly, there's a huge span between wanting to promote family and commenting that divorce should be criminalized. That he would even think that, much less say it, indicates that he's far too concerned with pushing his brand of morality on others to be entrusted with public office.

      > The public meetings? He did so in accordance to law. Those meetings were suppose to be closed.

      Is the definition of "public" in public meetings somehow confusing to you? What reasonable argument can you present that meetings of public officials discussing public business shouldn't be open to the public? What could a mayor possibly talk about in meetings that the general public shouldn't have access to? Last I checked, mayors don't discuss military or classified subjects in the course of their duties. It sounds more like he wants to talk about stuff that he'd rather his constituents don't hear about, and because of the above-stated reasons I suspect that means stuff that would get him in trouble if he wasn't allowed to control access. That's unacceptable in a public office.

      > Maybe those "top campaign" contributers are the most qualified? Oh, and EVERY policitian does that.

      First, you argue that these top contributors got the jobs for being most qualified, then you excuse the behavior by saying "every politician does that". Which is it? Did they get the jobs by being qualified, or should we excuse the cronyism because it's widespread? Didn't your mother teach you that "everyone does it" doesn't make it right?

      To put it bluntly, these comments of yours do little to reassure me that you're anything more than a shill. After the list I just reviewed, reading that you think he's an honest man carries no weight because I see nothing in your testimony that leads me to think you're an unbiased or honest commentator. Here's a hint: when you say that even after you no longer work with him, that you can call or email him and he'll respond personally, that says to others that you're a part of his inner circle. Maybe you should check to see whether the average citizen can do that before you try to use it to demonstrate that he's not better to those he knows than everyone else. People who are only honest and open with their friends aren't generally considered honest and open.

      Virg

    12. Re:Kokomo Resident by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      Mr. McKillip, is that you?

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    13. Re:Kokomo Resident by Altus · · Score: 1


      living death I tell you... nothing but living death.

      how anyone can manage to "live" like that I will never know.

      "If you know what life is worth, you will look for yours on earth" - Bob Marley

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    14. Re:Kokomo Resident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the kokomo song was about the florida keys.. and i thought you people were smart

  16. A few things FTA by corellon13 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "City officials turned down Nees, saying the teen could come in and hand-copy the list. Officials said giving out copies of address lists would leave the newsletter subscribers open to spam and computer viruses."

    I know it would've been a major pain to hand copy, but if this was a real effort by the teen to research and uncover abuse, why not just copy them down? I mean this has taken over a year now. He could have hand copied them and been done with it long before now.

    "Murray said the law, which restricts access to mailing addresses, doesn't extend to e-mail addresses..."

    This tells me that the City wasn't asking the teen to hand copy the addresses just to be jerks about it. They were applying an existing law for mailing addresses to email addresses. Seems reasonable to me.

    "Groth took the case on a pro-bono basis, but Murray asked for an accounting of Groth's fees in her ruling. Groth said Tuesday it's likely he could bill several thousand dollars for the case."

    Before we attack the bloodsucking lawyer, the compensation for the pro-bono part of this was the judges idea. This goes to show that we probably need some way of reeling in some of these justices. I mean, it's one thing if she wants to pay this lawyer out of her pocket, but she just imposed a huge bill on the tax payers of that city to pay someone who was fine doing this for free (free meaning the publicity).

    --
    Do what is right and let the consequence follow
    1. Re:A few things FTA by somersault · · Score: 1

      Seems reasonable to me

      isnt there usually a big difference between legal and reasonable? You cant expect to do things and get away with them, just because they're reasonable? If this guy can legally get a copy of the information, without having to handcopy it, then I'd call that 'reasonable', as long as he's not going to use it for spamming purposes. And if he is then he's an evil genius.. :s

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:A few things FTA by corellon13 · · Score: 1

      Let me clarify what I meant by reasonable. It seems a reasonable interpretation of the law to apply the law for mailing addresses to email addresses. We have similar problems with spam going to both. They both are a medium for delivering a form of written information as well.

      I just think that before we villify the City in this, we should note that they applied what they thought was a legitmate legal stance and were doing due diligence to protect peoples' private information.

      Props to the kid for working harder at being involved than most adults on this planet. I'm not taking that from him and I think that what he did was a great thing. I just don't think it's a black and white issue and was trying to put forth a perspective from the other side according to the article.

      --
      Do what is right and let the consequence follow
    3. Re:A few things FTA by somersault · · Score: 1

      well as far as I know and remember from learning about the data protection act etc, information stored electronically is a whole different ballpark from paper documents. Again, it may seem 'reasonable' to apply everything you think about paper documentation/mail to electronic versions, but the legislation has to exist, because in the eyes of the law at least, they are completely separate domains..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:A few things FTA by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Reeling in judges? No thanks. That's why we call them JUDGES - we elect them to use their judgement. If we want to just have a firm set of rules, then why have judges at all?

      Look at all the damage that's being done by changing sentencing guidelines to sentencing mandates - take the judgement from judges, and you end up with atrocities happening... people getting more time in prison for a joint than for rape, etc. If you don't like your judges' record, vote against them - but don't hamstring them from being able to give a person a break if they deserve it, or treat them MORE harshly than they deserve, just because the occasional thing you see reported makes you think your city can save a few bucks.

      --
      This space available.
    5. Re:A few things FTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, let the judge give this poor, starving lawyer a break. I mean, come on, where's the sympathy!

    6. Re:A few things FTA by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      I'm usually the first guy to back the idea of "reeling in the judges", but not for this. Do you know how many names were on the email list? That would have a lot to do with whether the city was being reasonable or not in saying the boy could copy them by hand. Suppose you want a copy of the book _War and Peace_, which I understand is quite a big book. Suppose further that I tell you that you may not buy a copy nor may you be given one by anybody. Further, you may not photocopy or use any type of video capturing device to record the pages. However, you may copy the entire thing by hand if you wish. Is that reasonable? The judge decided that the city had no grounds to not comply with the request and their offer to allow hand copying wasn't reasonable, so they can reimburse the boy's attorney for wasting everyone's time. If there's one thing judges don't like, that is having their time wasted. If the tax payers don't like footing the bill for this then maybe they need to elect people to the city government who will have better sense than to fight something that they can't win. I have news for you - governments do this kind of thing all the time because they have attorneys on their payroll and they can afford delaying tactics and endless appeals because normal people probably don't have enough time and money to fight them forever. Big corporations do the same thing. The judge in this case obviously felt that they only way to send a message to the city that what they did wasn't cool was to make them pay pro bono attorney fees.

    7. Re:A few things FTA by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      "City officials turned down Nees, saying the teen could come in and hand-copy the list. Officials said giving out copies of address lists would leave the newsletter subscribers open to spam and computer viruses."

      And each of these claims disproves the other. If giving out the list represents a risk, he should not be allowed to hand-copy it.

      I mean this has taken over a year now. He could have hand copied them and been done with it long before now.

      Is that the lesson you want young people to learn? That it's best to take the easiest way out, even when your government is not acting in compliance with the law?

    8. Re:A few things FTA by thewise1 · · Score: 1

      The 'huge' bill on the taxpayers is the fault of the mayor, not the judge. Do you blame the judge for wasting money when they find someone guilty of a crime and put them in jail? No, you blame the person who committed the crime. Same difference here except it wasn't a criminal case, instead it was civil. Maybe that huge bill will get the taxpayers to pull their heads out of their collective ass and vote the mayor out, if he's really so bad.

  17. Who else read the subject and then... by Mille+Mots · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...heard the voices in their head singing:

    Aruba, Jamaica
    Ooh I wanna take ya
    To Bermuda, Bahama
    Come on pretty mama
    Key Largo, Montego
    Baby why don't we go

    Ooh I wanna take you down to Kokomo
    We'll get there fast
    And then we'll take it slow
    That's where we wanna go
    Way down to Kokomo

    I think I need more coffee this morning. And maybe a lobotomy so I can forget the late 80s/early 90s once and for all. The booze doesn't seem to be working.

    1. Re:Who else read the subject and then... by thedletterman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had it in my head the entire time I was posting. I just couldn't find anyway to make it funny or relevant. It seems this little town sucks, and kokomo island sounds pretty nice right about now...

      --
      Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
    2. Re:Who else read the subject and then... by frankm_slashdot · · Score: 1

      i did. i heard the voices... and i heeded their call.

      im now playing brian wilsons "Smile" on repeat.

      if you dont know about brian wilson, smile or the beach boys... i suggest you do some looking up. its amazing.

    3. Re:Who else read the subject and then... by mrjb · · Score: 3, Funny

      And maybe a lobotomy so I can forget the late 80s/early 90s once and for all. The booze doesn't seem to be working.
      I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    4. Re:Who else read the subject and then... by RafaelGCPP · · Score: 1

      It was automatic!! I was even thinking on how to make a parody of that!!

      --
      "There is always an easy solution to every human problem -- neat, plausible, and wrong."
      H. L. Mencken
    5. Re:Who else read the subject and then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I heard it too, but it was the Muppets' version.

    6. Re:Who else read the subject and then... by dodongo · · Score: 1
      That's where we wanna go
      Way down to Kokomo


      I live less than an hour down Indiana 26 from this "Kokomo" place, and I assure you nobody wants to go there.

      I never understood this Beach Boys song until I found out there was another, more desireable Kokomo.
    7. Re:Who else read the subject and then... by chandoni · · Score: 1

      I think Kokomo was named as part of a vast Hoosier propaganda campaign to confuse tourists into visiting. There are all kinds of small towns in Indiana named after places people wished they lived instead: Atlanta, Peru, Miami, Ireland, Brazil, Richmond... sadly, even New Haven and Jonesboro.

    8. Re:Who else read the subject and then... by dodongo · · Score: 1

      I'm a big fan of Chili (spelled wrong, but there you go) and Russiaville (pronounced ROOSH-uh-vihl, as the story goes, so it doesn't sound Commie) and of course New Waverly. Not because of any sentimental value of Waverly, or where the hell Waverly even is, or if there even was an Old Waverly to begin with. I just think it's a funny name :)

    9. Re:Who else read the subject and then... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Have you tried wasting away in Margaritaville? I usually forget how I got there, so maybe it can help you. But then, maybe it's your own damn fault.

      A cheeseburger in Paradise usually helps me forget these things, too.

  18. City of Kokomo. by BillGodfrey · · Score: 4, Funny
    I guess he had no particular place to go.

    (Two cymbals and a snare drum fall down a canyon.)

    1. Re:City of Kokomo. by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      At least he had fun, fun fun, until his daddy took the t-bird away.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:City of Kokomo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be two drums and a cymbal? It's "ba-dum-chh", not "Ba-chh-chh"

  19. Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the kid sued and won. Who cares? Why is this on Slashdot?

  20. Freedom of Information Act by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Frankly, I'm surprised the city tried to contest this at all.

    Aside from the Freedom of Information Act, I could think of a ton of good reasons why this kid should get this or why anyone should be able to get a list like this. Whatever happened to the good old days where we were encouraged to snail mail every single person representing us in office?

    When I was younger, I was pretty dissatisfied with the insane food prices at my high school. Even worse was the fact that my parents were making me pay for my own food. So I threatened the school with the Freedom of Information Act and demanded to see all food related reciepts and documents including pay and taxes. They gave me two huge boxes full of crap and I spent one night sorting through everything. And, surprisingly enough, after I sorted through and found out how much they were paying Arrowmark or whoever the food service provider was--it just didn't make sense. The local grocery store had better prices.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Freedom of Information Act by lylum · · Score: 1

      The FOIA only applies to the FEDERAL government, not a city government. Unless there is a state or city law similar to the FOIA, information does not have to be released in that city.

    2. Re:Freedom of Information Act by PatTheGreat · · Score: 1

      Well, what happened? You've got me curious now.

      --
      Google: "All your data are belong to us."
    3. Re:Freedom of Information Act by magicchex · · Score: 1

      You can't just cut the story off like that. What happened?

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    4. Re:Freedom of Information Act by linuxpaul · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kudos to you for not putting up with the injustice, but "[Your] parents were making [you] pay for your own food"? Your first call should have been to social services, not the school cafeteria.

      --
      Usage: fortune -P [-f] -a [xsz] Q: file [rKe9] -v6[+] file1 ...
    5. Re:Freedom of Information Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally the FOIA applies to anyone who receives federal dollars.

    6. Re:Freedom of Information Act by lylum · · Score: 1

      The FOIA specifically applies only to federal agencies. -> http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/foia_updates/Vol_XVII_4/p age2.htm

  21. Kokomo (OT) by gibbsjoh · · Score: 1

    According to WikiPedia it's a Sandals resort and part of Jamaica.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kokomo_Island and yes it was the Beach Boys.

    John

    --
    -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
  22. You're thinking "contingent fee" by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Pro bono" on the other hand is short for pro bono publicum -- "for the good of the public".

    It's a quaint idea, doing something because it's the right thing to do. I don't doubt that increased notoriety is an incentive for pro bono work, although many pro bono cases are ones that will never garner much attention. In this case, I think the judge was eager to punish the defendant, and ordered the pro bono attorney's fees calculated so he'd have an excuse for making the punishment heavier.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:You're thinking "contingent fee" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notiriety: I do not think that word means what you think it means. I only state this because I've seen it misued a *lot*, recently.

      From dictionary.com:

      notoriety Audio pronunciation of "notoriety" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (nt-r-t)
      n.
              The quality or condition of being notorious; ill fame.
      Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
      Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
      Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

      notoriety
      n : the state of being known for some unfavorable act or quality [syn: ill fame]
      Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University

    2. Re:You're thinking "contingent fee" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen it misued a *lot*, recently

      I know what you mean. It begs the question: "Is our children literally learning nothing?"

    3. Re:You're thinking "contingent fee" by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Which might make some sort of sense if the mayor had to pay the cost, but the taxpayers are the ones that pay. The mayor fought the request even though his lawyers told him he wouldn't win. Why not, it's not like he was spending his own money.

      The judge should have made him pay out of his own pocket.

  23. This sounds kind of weird to me... by hot+soldering+iron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After reading TFA, is seems to me the whole thing was about who gets to be lazy. The city officials said that he could have the list, but he had to hand copy it himself. He sued to get them to just give him a copy of the list, and compensate his lawyer.

    I can sort of see his point. He was comparing two lists: a city newsletter, and one the mayor was using to build up political support. If he hand copied it, they could alway say he made a mistake or changed it, there would be no tracability. But an actual, official copy couldn't be denied. Now I understand why the mayor didn't want to give it out. It was a case of CYA.

    --
    When you want something built, come see me. If you want correct grammar and spelling, get a F*ing liberal arts student.
    1. Re:This sounds kind of weird to me... by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      That's not my view at all.

      As I understand it, FOIA requests of this sort usually mean that you'd receive an electronic list in electronic form; or printed out, if needed. But there is an explicite exception for lists of mail addresses; they are also freely available, but need to be copied by hand. That way, advertizers are discouraged from getting a bunch of these lists to send ads to. The city wanted to protect email adresses in the same way, to prevent spam. That sounds very reasonable to me. But the kid won because that wasn't wat the law literally said.

      I don't think it says anything at all about whether the mayor is actually guilty of what he's accused of or not.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
  24. Fitting Punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Disclaimer: This is comming from a K-Town Native.

    The only fitting punishment, as any Hoosier would know (that I am) is to put him in the fields and make him do some http://news.uns.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/990723.Ni elsen.detassel.htmlCorn Detasseling. It's hand-ripping slave labor. Ask anyone from around there, they'll tell that such a punishment makes Guantanamo Bay look like Club Med.

    Oh wait, he still lives in Kokomo. That's punishment enough.

    sean s.

    1. Re:Fitting Punishment by MacBrave · · Score: 1

      Detasseling is only hard work if you have to walk. I walked a couple years while detassling, but then one year I worked for a farmer near Peru, IN that had a detassling machine, basically a jacked up tractor with long 'arms' on each side containing buckets where the detasslers could stand. That was country club compared to walking.

      But you are right about detassling tearing up your hands. Every year we have some noobies show up on the first day without any gloves. Their hands were usually a bloody mess by lunchtime.

    2. Re:Fitting Punishment by merchant_x · · Score: 1

      Heh Detasseling was the work for people that were to fragile to walk beans. Now there's a truly horrible job. Not only do you get the cut up hands like you do from detasseling, but you also get the agonizing back pain of have spent 12 hours crouching in a hot bean field.

    3. Re:Fitting Punishment by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      Cold, wet mornings. Hot, humid afternoons. Thousands of paper cuts on any exposed skin. Miles of trudging through the mud. I am so glad I never have to do that again. However, I still prefer detassling to rouging beans. At least you get to stand up straight. xander

    4. Re:Fitting Punishment by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Yeh, that sucked. Now all the beans are genetically engineered to be Roundup resistant. We also raised pigs. Cutting the tails off baby pigs with wire cutters, I could handle. Cutting the tips off their incisors, that sucked. Of course, you only had to castrate half of them.

      Guess that may have something to do with getting an engineering degree :)

  25. Hand Copying allowed? by austinpoet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What I don't understand is how the government can make a distinction between hand-copying and other forms of copying.

    What if I have a hand-held scanner (as was posted the other day on /. and have existed for years)? Is that hand-copying? What if I use a whole candy-machine full of silly puddy? Can I use carbon paper too?

    I mean I realize that the government can legislatively make a distinction between a 3lb carrot and a 5lb carrot, but do they think they are being clever with this? Is this security through frustration/writers-cramp? Is there some time limit placed on the copier?

    Does the government employ 1000s of workers to hand-compile the list initially?

    1. Re:Hand Copying allowed? by dtsazza · · Score: 1
      Moreover, they believe that:
      ...giving out copies of address lists would leave the newsletter subscribers open to spam and computer viruses.
      and yet are happy to gdo exactly this to a teenager who's clearly a bit of a techno whizz, and likely anti-establishment (given this episode)?

      Let's for the moment assume they meant "electronically" in the above claim. Then it's the distinction that puzzles me. If you claim safety/anti-virus as your reason for making him copy it out by hand, then you're implying that emailing someone a list, or mailing them a floppy with some files on, or whatever is open to abuse, but somehow that person coming in and copying them down himself isn't? Very weird - it's either inconsistent, or more worringly they're saying that any other method of transmission other than eye and pencil is substantially insecure.

      So what'll it be - negligent, inconsistent or dangerously under-secured...?
      --
      My, that was a yummy potato!
    2. Re:Hand Copying allowed? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      This is where that pen-sized scanner from a recent /. story would come in handy...

    3. Re:Hand Copying allowed? by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      City officials turned down Nees, saying the teen could come in and hand-copy the list. Officials said giving out copies of address lists would leave the newsletter subscribers open to spam and computer viruses.

      So, an electronic copy is dangerous while a handwritten copy is not? Hey, "officials" - data is data, regardless of the medium it's recorded on.

      All that offer was was a way for the "officials" to say that they were making the data available, while making it impossibly inconvenient for anyone to access it in a compiled form (electronic or otherwise). Note that they didn't even offer to provide the data in printed form, but would require someone to come and copy it themselves.

      Glad someone with judicial oversight called shenanigans on that move.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    4. Re:Hand Copying allowed? by TimeTrav · · Score: 1

      A representative from the adult filmmakers' industry will shortly be contacting you for further details on this previously mentioned 5lb carrot, possibly leading to a supply contract offer.

      --
      [sig]you really dont want the answers, trust me[/sig]
    5. Re:Hand Copying allowed? by austinpoet · · Score: 1

      I look forward to their inquiry :)

  26. Whomever modded parent OT should get a radio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That and a sense of humour.




    What a waste of mod points...

    1. Re:Whomever modded parent OT should get a radio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why... to listen to one of the most overplayed songs of the 80s? I love the 80s but I could not stand that song due to how much it was played on the radio all the time.

      For the younger crowd, it was the 80s equivalent of the Macarena.

  27. Re:Pro-bono by PCeye · · Score: 1

    How could Sonny Bono be pretentious when he is six feet under?

  28. Sweet Old Kokomo by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1
    How long before they change the law?!

    Comment title refers to a Kokomo Arnold song which influenced Robert Johnson.

    1. Re:Sweet Old Kokomo by Afromelonhead · · Score: 1
      How long before they change the law?!

      According to this article, the state legislature is planning on changing the open records law specificially to exclude mailing lists from being able to be released to the public under the law. So... not very long at all.

      --
      Procrastination sucks.
  29. Al Gore by w.p.richardson · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Al Gore thought a hand recount would be more accurate in 2000.

    Guess it's all a matter of perspective.

    --

    Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

  30. Pressures of Cafeteria Food Preparation by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    When I was younger, I was pretty dissatisfied with the insane food prices at my high school. Even worse was the fact that my parents were making me pay for my own food. So I threatened the school with the Freedom of Information Act and demanded to see all food related reciepts and documents including pay and taxes. They gave me two huge boxes full of crap and I spent one night sorting through everything. And, surprisingly enough, after I sorted through and found out how much they were paying Arrowmark or whoever the food service provider was--it just didn't make sense. The local grocery store had better prices.
    I can't speak to your particular high school cafeteria experience, but my mother runs a local school cafeteria (my old elementary school, actually) and the purchasing process is more complicated than it might seem at first blush. There are very strict rules on what the dietary allowances for a meal are and the cafeteria manager is forced to buy certain amounts of surplus food off of the government if they want to be subsidized by the government free and discounted lunch program. Add that to the fun of having to get each and every receipt individually approved by administration, and I could easily see a cafeteria manager turning to a single company (and I suspect you mean Aramark) for their food supply needs rather than driving all over town to try to save 5 cents on the price of tuna. My mother manages it by shopping at Sam's Club and the patience of a saint (as well as years of experience in putting together meals for our family of 8). And admittedly, those who came before her were not as good at economizing. When she started working there, the funds for the cafeteria and the funds for the rest of the school were kept strictly seperate because the cafeteria consistently was in the red. Now, they're fighting to get the budgets merged again because my mother has the cafeteria in better financial straits than the school.

    Incidentally, I'm wondering if you're in a private school or outside of the US, because here, the prices for cafeteria meals are standardized due to the aforementionned free and reduced lunch program.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  31. New legislation being worked on anyways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The reason the kid tried to get the email list is that he was subscribed to the list and got political solicitations from the mayor. When the list was just supposed to be a "what is going on in Kokomo" type list

    There is new legislation being worked on to make the ruling void anyways.

    below is grabbed from http://www.indianacog.org/ (first place I could find the bill listing)

    ----------------------
    SB 205 (see more information on this page) passed out of the House Government and Regulatory Reform Committee with a 9-1 vote and is eligible for second reading amendments in the House. Should it pass, Nees' successful ruling will be a moot point. Legislators will have made secret the e-mail lists compiled by public officials.

  32. FTFA . . . by Dausha · · Score: 1

    "'The city's arguments here are of a policy rather than a legal character, and are more appropriately addressed to the Indiana Legislature rather than to this court," Murray wrote. "The courts cannot fill gaps in a statutory scheme designed by the legislature.'"

    This judge chose not to "legislate from the bench," but instead deferred to the people, via the legislature, to determine public policy. So, for this coup we have to thank a non-activist judge.

    --
    What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  33. I wanted to say yay! by faloi · · Score: 1

    But then I read:
    Murray said the law, which restricts access to mailing addresses, doesn't extend to e-mail addresses, as the city's attorneys contended. She said the city must turn over either a copy or an electronic copy of the list.

    While I'm all for the government not being able to hide this kind of stuff (and it sounds like they weren't really, they gave the kid a chance to make his own copy, so they were making it difficult), I'm not sure I like the idea of someone being able to send a note to city hall and get copies of email addresses. Sure, your physical address gives people a lot more opportunities to abuse it, but I don't want my email address being handed out either.

    Or at least I wouldn't if I'd ever given the government my email address. I figure if it's that important, they can eat the cost of bulk postage and send me a letter :)

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
  34. And for his prize.... by RoboSpork · · Score: 1

    He wins a free trip to Bermuda, Bahama, and a pretty mama! Seriously, calling a town in Indiana Kokomo reminds me of the story of how Greenland came to be called Greenland when it is most certainly not a green land.

    1. Re:And for his prize.... by Inner_Child · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never been to Santa Claus or French Lick (also home to the Mount Lebanon Cemetery). The Midwest is a haven for bizarre and foreign city names.

      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
    2. Re:And for his prize.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The city of Kokomo, Indiana is 150 years old.

      The Beach Boys song (Which I believe sings about a fictional place in the Carribean which was inspired by the name of the City of Kokomo, Indiana) is less than 20 years old.

      How is that at all related to Greenland?

    3. Re:And for his prize.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Beach Boys song (Which I believe sings about a fictional place in the Carribean which was inspired by the name of the City of Kokomo, Indiana) is less than 20 years old.

      You lose at Wikipedia.

      Kokomo may refer to:

      • Kokomo, Indiana, a city located in Howard County, Indiana, United States
      • Kokomo Arnold, the stage name of the 1930s blues musician James Arnold
      • Kokomo Island , a privately owned island in Jamaica, made world-famous by the eponymous Beach Boys song.
      • Kokomo, a song written by Mike Love of The Beach Boys in 1988, which became one of the band's biggest hits.
      • Indiana University Kokomo, a satellite campus in Kokomo, Indiana
    4. Re:And for his prize.... by Fishsticks · · Score: 1

      And I also live a few miles west of Brazil and work a few miles south of Paris. It's quite a commute, unless you consider that it's Brazil, IN and Paris, IL :)

  35. The Rest of the Anecdote (for MagicChex) by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, ok, I didn't think the result was really that important but ...

    I was working with three other guys to try and figure out what suggestions to make. And also let me say that this was a high school (not a gradeschool) and there were some insanely pricey healthy foods but super cheap candy and twinkies as you went up to the cash register.

    We contacted Hy-Vee (our local grocery store) and asked them how difficult (and how expensive) it would be to make regular shipments of real fruit and real food to the cafeteria. It turned out to be quite a bit cheaper than shipping it 3 hours from the nearest metropolis--imagine that!

    So when we approached them with this idea, they said it wasn't that simple. That they had contracts with their distributor and they couldn't break them--which was strange because they could bring in Dominos pizza every friday.

    So, in the end, they made token price adjustments on the foods to make everyone happy. A nickel here, a dime there. But the prices kept going up until they were eventually were higher than they were before. They blame that on inflation. Then I graduated and just kind of accepted that crap like that happens in hick towns like the one where I grew up.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Rest of the Anecdote (for MagicChex) by khallow · · Score: 1

      You can get that anywhere you have a captive customer base, whether it be schools, stadiums, or airports. It turns out that one of the ways an institution can make money is by setting up a monopoly. This can be a sneaky way for schools to get money out of students. For example, at one university campus I went to, they had overpriced payphones in every building, all owned by the same business. You can bet that the university got a piece of the action.

    2. Re:The Rest of the Anecdote (for MagicChex) by emidln · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah. For example, my high school did away with the cafeteria staff and started to bring in lunches from local establishments (McDonald's, Subway, some local italian places Alumni owned, that sort of thing) and they set two flat rates. On "A" days it would be $3 and on "B" it would be $4. This included a sandwich of your choice and a bag of chips. This is how it worked out:

      You order a plain Double Cheeseburger for lunch. You get your burger, grab a bag of chips from a Sam's club box, and pay $3 for it.

      Some simple math here:

      Double cheeseburger $1
      Bag of Chips $3.99/24 (at the local grocery store, not Sam's club)

      So how does this come out to $3? The school claims that McDonald's was charing them more for the large order. Wait a second, has anyone else heard of large orders INCREASING the price? It was my understanding that ordering in bulk made it cheaper. After that excuse was diffused it became a delivery charge. So, McDonald's is getting better than $1.50 over retail PER SANDWICH for about 250 sandwiches? I was arguing about that when I graduated, but last I heard, the program was still in place.

      Either McDonald's closed one hell of a deal with my school (and that would mean somebody is getting a kickback off of that) or my school is taking in about $375+ a day in pure profit. The other days of the week were similar ripoffs.

      Go go private catholic high schools.

  36. What about privacy? by Kohath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What about the privacy of the people who submitted their email addresses?

    This is just typical of Slashdot. If Sony wanted the list for the same reason, then the privacy of the email recipients would matter. Since there's a teenager involved, it's OK for him to violate their privacy all he wants.

    It just proves that Slashdoters don't really care about privacy at all. It's just a tool to advance other agendas or bash your enemies.

    1. Re:What about privacy? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      What about the privacy of the people who submitted their email addresses?

      The purpose of this case was to determine if the Mayor had been misuing those addresses in the first place. Those people might have liked to know that their privacy had been violated by the people they had submitted it to. Two wrongs don't make a right, but if the first wrong turns out to be true, the second in this case sure goes a long way towards providing the information necesssary to fix the first.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:What about privacy? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the "purpose" is now moot. It doesn't matter if you want the list for "good" or for "evil", this ruling says you can get it.

      The question is, how do you protect the privacy of the individual and still have an open government when the goverment holds personal information on everyone it governs?

    3. Re:What about privacy? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Becasue gorenmant is PUBLIC and SONY is private.
      pretty simple, really.
      Very little that a city does is not public, very little. Guess what? if I thought the Mayor was using his position to get a list of people who would be favorable towards campiagn contributions, I could get that list as well.

      Your home address, mortgage, improvements are all public information as well.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:What about privacy? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Since there's a teenager involved, it's OK for him to violate their privacy all he wants.

      He's not violating anyones privacy. The email addresses are a matter of public record, and were offered to him - assuming he was willing to copy them *by hand*, which he wasn't.

      If you don't want your email address to become part of public record, then bloody well don't give it to the government. It's really that simple, and you can't have it both ways.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  37. Since it's a kid, it's ok? by SpiritGod21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's the difference between what this kid did and what the US government is currently trying to do with search engine results? Besides the fact that the kid requested email addresses, not just results that can't be tied to any particular person.

    I don't think the government should be able to get those results, but what's with the /. crowd justifying this kid? Because he's one of the "little people," it's ok for the city to hand him a stack of email addresses rather than just shredding them? If that's the case, why not just create a white pages for email and let the spammers have at, like telemarketing companies do with our phones (I have to leave my ringer off these days).

    1. Re:Since it's a kid, it's ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google isn't a government institution being paid for by public funds extracted (in the end) at gunpoint. The kid paid (one way or another) for that list to be created and maintained so he has some rights to it. Whoever gave their email address to the city had (or should have had) an expectation that since public funds were involved the data might be public.

      The govt raiding google is a very different situation, they have no moral or (direct) legal rights to the data and the users of google have the expectation that the data might be private, or at least not public.

    2. Re:Since it's a kid, it's ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      search results/queries are not part of public records, duh!

    3. Re:Since it's a kid, it's ok? by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. Since he is a private citizen different laws apply than the laws that apply to the US Government.

  38. Except for... by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

    "That's why we call them JUDGES - we elect them to use their judgement."

    And what about the judges who are appointed?

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    1. Re:Except for... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Make them a political liability for whom ever appoints them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  39. Expensive attorneys they hired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a city like Kokomo, chances are the City Attorney handled this legal matter. In a city of that size, he's not getting paid much at all, and has an even smaller budget to hire outside help.

  40. As you understand it by flyinwhitey · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're wrong.

    "As I understand it, FOIA requests..."

    apply to FEDERAL government, not state and local.

    There are laws that apply locally as well, but they obviously vary from state to state.

    From wiki

    "United States

            Main article: Freedom of information in the United States

    In the United States the Freedom of Information Act was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 4, 1966 and went into effect the following year. The Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments were signed by President Bill Clinton on October 2, 1996.

    The Act applies only to federal agencies. However, all of the states, as well as the District of Columbia and some territories, have enacted similar statutes to require disclosures by agencies of the state and of local governments, though some are significantly broader than others. Many combine this with Open Meetings legislation, which requires government meetings to be held publicly."

    Once again I have stymied ignorance. You're welcome.

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
  41. FOP? by Don'tTreadOnMe · · Score: 1
    FOP?

    Guessing:

    "Fat Old Politicians"?

    "Freaky Omniscient Paladins"?

    "Flatulence On Parade"?

    "Fallacious Optometrist Propagandists"?

    1. Re:FOP? by Fiznarp · · Score: 1

      Fraternal Order of Police

      http://www.instatefop.org/

      Fiz

    2. Re:FOP? by MacBrave · · Score: 2, Informative

      lol, try "Fraternal Order of Police".

      And as a previous poster alluded to, having a FOP sticker on your car pretty much makes you immune to minor traffic violations. At least that's the myth in Indiana......

    3. Re:FOP? by Brushfireb · · Score: 1

      And it is indeed a myth, at least in Indianapolis metro. Unsure about rural areas, I dont live there...

    4. Re:FOP? by Bearpaw · · Score: 1
      And as a previous poster alluded to, having a FOP sticker on your car pretty much makes you immune to minor traffic violations. At least that's the myth in Indiana......

      I've heard that story in various places. It might even be true in some of them. No doubt the folks who do the fund-raising for FOPs are very careful to unconvincingly deny the rumor, if they're asked. Deny it because it's essentially bribery, but deny it unconvincingly because I'm sure it gets people with more money than ethics to support the FOP.

      Maybe the Red Cross should start a rumor that donating blood will get people priority treatment at hospitals.

    5. Re:FOP? by OxygenPenguin · · Score: 1

      Believe me, it's no myth. I've had one on my cars for years. There are also various types and grades of sponsorship.

      If you're a premium member, they give you what looks like a Sherrif's badge. That pretty much makes you God on the highways, unless you get somebody that a State or not in the FOP.

      --
      Read the only personal Runyon page out there.
    6. Re:FOP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the worst part is that they typically hire a paid telemarketing service to make the calls and collections for them AND they are NOT tax-deductible gifts to a charitable organization (at least as far as the IRS is concerned; individual state tax laws may vary slightly). I pinned a caller in NH to the wall on that one and threatened legal action if they ever called again. They didn't, and my local PD was never informed, either, so it's likely the local cops aren't even aware of the travesty.

      I'm glad the judge is making the assholes pay for the pro-bono work, though. It's not just additional punishment piled on the bad guys, it's also sending a message that those who do the pro bono work will not have their time wasted, and that what they contributed really was in the public good.

    7. Re:FOP? by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      You're either lucky, or you think that driving 5MPH over the limit is reckless abandon for the law. I worked with a guy who had been a premium supporter for years. It took him a lawyer and probably six months to wiggle out of some 20+ traffic violations which he had been written up for in his car with the "I support various police organizations at the maximum level" stickers attached. The guy was a late 20's white male who didn't look like a thug, either, so it wasn't some kind of profiling or whatever.

      I had a car with oen of those stickers on it (it came with the used car - the police get plenty of my money through taxes and fines for exceeding the ridiculously low speed limits on rural roads). Even though I blew by a cop at well over 100MPH (he was merging onto the interstate), he still pulled me over. But then he left me to go down the road and pull over the Mustang I was following. As I drove by, he was out of his car, and waved me over. I stomped on the gas and took the next exit. I'm pretty sure I got away because he was out of his car and didn't get a license number, and that the sticker meant nothing...

  42. DST by MasaMuneCyrus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now how about we sue Mitch Daniels for going against the people and going against hundreds of years of history by forcing us to have DST. >_>

  43. obligatory grammar correction by Brunellus · · Score: 4, Informative

    actually, it's "pro bono publico"-- since the adjective (publico) modifies the object (bono) of the preposition (pro), it must agree in case (in this case, ablative).

    I might not know a lick about C syntax, but I can certainly remember my Latin....

    1. Re:obligatory grammar correction by mjpaci · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great. That's what Slashdot needs, Latin Grammar Nazis.

      Hic, haec, hoc
      Huius, huius, huis ... ...

      --Mike

    2. Re:obligatory grammar correction by Asklepius+M.D. · · Score: 1

      If you're going to correct the grammar, then correct the translation as well. It should be for the public good rather than for the good of the republic since the latter indicates possession and therefore the genitive rei publicae while the publicus -a -um used in the former is adjectival and must agree in case with the object bono.

      --
      He who would be a man, must be a nonconformist. -- Emerson
    3. Re:obligatory grammar correction by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Great. That's what Slashdot needs, Latin Grammar Nazis.

      CENTURION: What's this, then? 'Romanes Eunt Domus'? 'People called Romanes they go the house'?

      BRIAN: It-- it says, 'Romans, go home'.

      CENTURION: No, it doesn't.

    4. Re:obligatory grammar correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hic, haec, hoc
      Huius, huius, huis ... ...


      Take a big spoonful of sugar and put a brown paper bag over your head.

    5. Re:obligatory grammar correction by nazsco · · Score: 1

      Fac ut vivas

    6. Re:obligatory grammar correction by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Great. That's what Slashdot needs, Latin Grammar

      At least is wasn't a mis-typed line of code. Those threads go on for days.

    7. Re:obligatory grammar correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFS, is beating a dead language the same as beating a dead horse? 'Cause it seems about as useful.

    8. Re:obligatory grammar correction by mjpaci · · Score: 2, Funny

      I didn't realize we had so many cunning linguists here...

      Another Latin phrase we used as pledges of my fraternity on a banner for the Delta Delta Delta Decathalon:

      Veni, Vidi, VD. I came, I saw, I canckered.

      Needless to say, the ladies of Tri-Delt were not impressed.

      --Mike

    9. Re:obligatory grammar correction by sepluv · · Score: 1

      Fufilling slashdot's mission to go boldly whence no man has before gone. (It makes a change from the same old nazis).

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
  44. Not the first stone cast in this fight.... by bjq · · Score: 4, Informative

    This isn't the first round between McKillip and Nees. Nees had previously created a documentary film about McKillip entitled Words of Sedition: how the highest levels of power shut down free speech in Kokomo.

    You can find more info on this case from when it was filed in this Indianapolis Star article.

    You can also read more about it on Nees' personal website.

    You can watch Words of Sedition online as well.

    1. Re:Not the first stone cast in this fight.... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      "Highest levels of power"? I don't think the mayor of some town nobody's ever heard of qualifies as the highest level of power.

  45. Re:Kokomo (OT) by malbosher · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    funny... I thohgt wilkpedia labled kokomo as a drink!!

  46. Doesn't this have the opposite effect? by miller701 · · Score: 1

    Great now there'll be no way to stop Pols from using city generated mail lists for their own purposes. Isn't this what the kid was against in the first place?

    1. Re:Doesn't this have the opposite effect? by wasexton · · Score: 1

      Yes, catch 22 here. He couldn't do the comparison without the list and...well, you get the idea. Had the officials been innocent, they should have given him the list with a signed agreement that it would be destroyed after a comparison was made. Their fight just leads me to think that he was correct in his original assertion that the list was misused.

  47. Kokomo is in INDIANA? by pwright2 · · Score: 1

    I always presumed it was someplace exotic. Like New Jersey.

  48. Re: Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing I noticed on my cross country road trip was that Indiana had the scariest police. You don't want to mess with these boys, doubly so for the highway troopers. Most of them are ex military corn fed midwest country boys. Indiana has its own thing that those who haven't spent any time there have no idea about. It is conservative, it is repressed, there is an eerie feeling that the 50's never left, just the window dressing is different. The only scarier state that I passed through was Wyoming. I got pulled over for speeding and I had to pay the ticket on the spot. In cold cash. The way the fuzz laid it out for me was pay now in cash or spend the night in jail. My bad for hauling ass through there in a 76 Cutlass Supreme with California plates, it might as well have been a red ferrari. Of course I have never ventured below the Mason-Dixon line, but I am sure those that have passed through the deep south have a story or two to tell about the fuzz. Something along the lines of, "Boy, looks like ya got a busted headlight" **crash**......

  49. Intent Matters...? by wasexton · · Score: 1

    In this case, as I read it, the kid was trying to get the list in order to compare it to a list that a public official was using for his newsletter. In other words, he wanted to make the comparison in order to see if that public official had made his own electronic copy of the list. Now, while I am concerned as well about the possibility of spammers getting copies of email addresses from the government, I also see the intent here and think that some common sense should be used regarding the intent of his request. Then again, the Mayor's stance on the whole issue does lend some credence to the original theory that the list was misused in the first plance. Just my 2 cents. Art Sexton

  50. I, for one by Brunellus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ego, ex mea parte, saluto dominos nostros novos grammaticos!

    1. Re:I, for one by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.

      (Care of this site.)

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    2. Re:I, for one by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.

      (Care of this site.)

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    3. Re:I, for one by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      Supplica me, servus!

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    4. Re:I, for one by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1
      The neat thing about Latin is that I have no idea what the words mean but it's easy to puzzle out your statement because the Latin words strongly resemble English terms.

      Saluto? Salute? Welcome?
      Dominos? Dominion? Masters?
      Nostros? Actually my SPanish background helps here, being as it's a Romance language. "Neustros." "We/our".
      Novos? Again, Spanish helps. "Neuvos" is the plural of "new". And grammaticos is obvious.

      A little English vocabulary and light understanding of one Romance language and you can damn near read Latin.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    5. Re:I, for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but not quite, it really depends...
      Being native portuguese speaker, and having a bit of vocabulary in english, i can't read latin.
      Some phases like the above are quite easy, but it's much more common to get to a bunch of words that you'll have no idea where they come from, and for that matter whate in the hell do they mean.

      And now i have to type 'flowers' for this post to get accepted...

    6. Re:I, for one by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't speak latin, you cloddus insensitivicus!

    7. Re:I, for one by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Ego, ex mea parte, saluto dominos nostros novos grammaticos!

      Literal translation only through English:

      Myself, from my part, salute dominating our new grammatists.

      Which is almost the meaning, and goes to show that although word order (in particular, the position of "dominos") doesn't matter in Latin, it definitely makes a difference in English.

    8. Re:I, for one by gcatullus · · Score: 1

      Ave Brunellus, nos lusituri te salutamus.

    9. Re:I, for one by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be "superdominos"?

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    10. Re:I, for one by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I actually took Latin in highschool, but I'm stuck on a problem...

      How the hell do you say "Soviet Russia" in Latin???

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    11. Re:I, for one by Brunellus · · Score: 1

      literal translation is actually:

      I, for my part, salute lords ours new grammatical

      standard, schoolboy Latin (the sort you default to when you have to do English-to-Latin prose composition exercises) usually gives a fairly standard word-order: Subject, object, verb. Adjectives usually follow the nouns they modify, so in this case "dominos" has three adjectives modifying it (nostros novos grammaticos). In totally conventional schoolboy Latin, you would expect the sentence to read something like Ego ex mea parte dominos nostros novos grammaticos saluto--note the verb at the very end, like German. But once you get your head around how the language works, you can switch it up and around for various rhetorical/stylistic effects. Actually quite cool.

    12. Re:I, for one by Brunellus · · Score: 1

      "Russia Sovietica"?

  51. Why did he want the list again? by tazan · · Score: 1

    If this is the sort of list any moron could walk up and request on a floppy disk then what possible misuse of the list could there be?

  52. Re: Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about know but as of 1999 indiana had the least educated police force in the US according to thier own statistics. This is becuase they are paid so poorly.

  53. Move over, Michael Moore by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am sure we have not heard the last of this. It would not surprise me that the mayor would use the city mailing list for personal political gain, and once Ryan has the list in hand, I'm sure he will not be hesitant about making public his findings.

    Check out his website for more details about this case, as well as his movie about this administration's other questionable practices. Quite impressive collection, especially for a 16 year old. Reminds me of a young Alex Jones.

    --
    Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
    1. Re:Move over, Michael Moore by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      You'll see this kid will be president in 50 years, or killed. Or both.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    2. Re:Move over, Michael Moore by WebGangsta · · Score: 1
      I am sure we have not heard the last of this. It would not surprise me that the mayor would use the city mailing list for personal political gain, and once Ryan has the list in hand, I'm sure he will not be hesitant about making public his findings.

      And this is just the tip of the iceberg: US Congressmen are currently purchasing email lists, cross-referencing them with geographic databases, and then sending spam^h^h^h^h informative newsletters to their constituents. The newsletters contain the appropriate "if you would like to opt-out..." text, which is funny, as the recipients never opted in in the first place.

      Isn't it nice that our taxpayer dollars are being spent so our politicians can send us spam^h^h^h^h email? Even worse: now the gov't has your email address (insert Big Brother theme music here).

    3. Re:Move over, Michael Moore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If he can use facts instead of half-truths and misrepresentations, he's already way ahead of Moore...


      --just another littleton resident

  54. obligatory python reference by ephemeraleuphoria · · Score: 5, Funny

    Brian is writing a slogan on a wall, oblivious to the Roman patrol approaching from behind. The slogan is "ROMANES EUNT DOMUS".

    Centurion: What's this thing? "ROMANES EUNT DOMUS"? "People called Romanes they go the house?"
    Brian: It... it says "Romans go home".
    Centurion: No it doesn't. What's Latin for "Roman"?

    Brian hesitates

    Centurion: Come on, come on!
    Brian: (uncertain) "ROMANUS".
    Centurion: Goes like?
    Brian: "-ANUS".
    Centurion: Vocative plural of "-ANUS" is?
    Brian: "-ANI".
    Centurion: (takes paintbrush from Brian and paints over) "RO-MA-NI". "EUNT"? What is "EUNT"?
    Brian: "Go".
    Centurion: Conjugate the verb "to go"!
    Brian: "IRE". "EO", "IS", "IT", "IMUS", "ITIS", "EUNT".
    Centurion: So "EUNT" is ...?
    Brian: Third person plural present indicative, "they go".
    Centurion: But "Romans, go home!" is an order, so you must use the ...?

    He lifts Brian by his short hairs

    Brian: The ... imperative.
    Centurion: Which is?
    Brian: Um, oh, oh, "I", "I"!
    Centurion: How many Romans? (pulls harder)
    Brian: Plural, plural! "ITE".

    Centurion strikes over "EUNT" and paints "ITE" on the wall

    Centurion: "I-TE". "DOMUS"? Nominative? "Go home", this is motion towards, isn't it, boy?
    Brian: (very anxious) Dative?

    Centurion draws his sword and holds it to Brian's throat

    Brian: Ahh! No, ablative, ablative, sir. No, the, accusative, accusative, ah, DOMUM, sir.
    Centurion: Except that "DOMUS" takes the ...?
    Brian: ... the locative, sir!
    Centurion: Which is?
    Brian: "DOMUM".
    Centurion: (satisfied) "DOMUM"...

    He strikes out "DOMUS" and writes "DOMUM"

    Centurian: ..."-MUM". Understand?
    Brian: Yes sir.
    Centurion: Now write it down a hundred times.
    Brian: Yes sir, thank you sir, hail Caesar, sir.
    Centurion: (saluting) Hail Caesar. If it's not done by sunrise, I'll cut your balls off.
    Brian: (very relieved) Oh thank you sir, thank you sir, hail Caesar and everything, sir!

    1. Re:obligatory python reference by araemo · · Score: 1

      And this is a perfect example of why I got the hell out of latin class after two semesters. :/

      Well, this, and moving to a school district that didn't offer latin.

    2. Re:obligatory python reference by henni16 · · Score: 1

      He, and the first time I saw that movie was:
      In Latin class. Simply hilarious.

      Only the one or two hardcore Pythonists of the thirty students had seen the movie before.
      => Class floored with laughter, evil grinning teacher saying something like "*sigh* Of, if only we were allowed to teach that way.."

    3. Re:obligatory python reference by Matthaeus · · Score: 1

      Evans?

      Or rather, Magister Evansis qui Destruit?

    4. Re:obligatory python reference by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      So, this is one of the first documented cases of a grammer Nazi (was there some Summerians that went around doing this?). I wonder what one of the first instances of invoking Godwin's law would be, probably someone saying Ramses-I was just like Hitler.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    5. Re:obligatory python reference by barfomar · · Score: 1

      You must have gone to a Jebby school.

  55. Zoinks, Scoob! by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for you meddling kids!!

    Now, git off my lawn!

    --
    sudo eat my shorts
  56. And the article reflects that... by porkThreeWays · · Score: 1

    City officials turned down Nees, saying the teen could come in and hand-copy the list. Officials said giving out copies of address lists would leave the newsletter subscribers open to spam and computer viruses.

    What it sounds like to me is he wanted an electronic version. They said "no, you can come in and hand copy the list yourself, but that's all you get". Which is completely reasonable. I work in local government and it's well known that almost anything we do is public record (very few exceptions). However! We don't just haphazardly give information away. It costs time and money to make information available, so it's generally asked that citizens put forth some effort to narrow down the information they want and go to some effort to get it. Usually there is some sort of processing fee and you have to know specifically what you want. It seems totally reasonable to say "we'll give you the list, but if you are going to use it for some malicious purpose we're going to make it harder for you to spam than cut-paste".

    --
    If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
    1. Re:And the article reflects that... by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

      We don't just haphazardly give information away. It costs time and money to make information available, so it's generally asked that citizens put forth some effort to narrow down the information they want and go to some effort to get it. Usually there is some sort of processing fee and you have to know specifically what you want.

      This is a source of irritation for me. Some of these 'processing fees' are astronomical. Time and money has already been spent: they're the record clerks who manage this information, and they're paid by the taxpayers.

      Some of the fees levied are absolutely ridiculous (think DMV). Imagine if this same fee philosophy applied to other things, such as your bank, retirement fund management company, etc.

      Sorry, but I've worked as an IT contractor at State and Federal agencies before, and have simply witnessed too much malaise and laziness to think that everything needs to have a fee, much less one that's not trivial.

    2. Re:And the article reflects that... by honkycat · · Score: 1

      Well, to some degree the fee is to recover some of those costs in the first place. You're not just paying for the copy of the record you're requesting, your fee is helping to pay for the work that goes into maintaining all the records. When the budgets are worked out, an estimate of the fee income goes in to it.

      Not to say I disagree that the fees can be excessive, but it does cost more than a photocopy and a stamp for the county to be able to give you a birth certificate, e.g.

  57. I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by rspress · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email address and was added to her political email list. No one even read the email because it thanked me for my support. I was complaining of her support of the issue. However since she is a democrat I doubt anyone would call her on this. Democrats are usually given a pass in matters like this.

    1. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by geekoid · · Score: 1

      As opposed to Republicans who are given a pass to start illegal wars, lie to the public so they can send the publics kids to die, and then cover up information about the war?

      my point? Your post was just an excuse to rant about a party, and it had nothing to do with topic.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, if you could have held off on the last two sentences, your comment would have been modded up interesting.
      From the perspective of the LP, all the hypocritical self-righteousness of the two ruling parties cracks me up.
      Not to mention the mudslinging of their supporters.

    3. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by rspress · · Score: 1

      Democrats have done exactly the same thing. Kennedy and L.B.J. did all those things you mentioned. I kept my post on topic, you had to go off topic to try and make a point.

      I do thank you however, you made my point for me with your post.

    4. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by AK+Marc · · Score: 0, Troll

      However since she is a democrat I doubt anyone would call her on this.

      You are an ignorant ass, so we won't focus on her. You are too stupid to see the difference between a mayor taking a list from the government to use for personal reasons, and trying to deny the list to everyone else, compared to someone that puts all people who send her email on her list.

      Are you too stupid to realize that you sent her your email address willingly? You gave it to her. She didn't steal it. It isn't about politicians sending emails. It is about a politician that used a list he shouldn't, then illegally denied access to it for others. I don't care if you got an email from someone you hate. I'm glad it pissed you off. You sound pretty stupid and petty.

      Oh, and no, I'm not a Democrat. Not just Democrats recognize stupidity when they see it.

    5. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by rspress · · Score: 1

      Sure I sent here my email address, as a complaint. I could have signed up for her newsletter via the link provided to do so on her site. Instead I signed up for it without being told I was doing so. Since that time I have been getting email from other democratic causes. I am also pretty sure they did not share my email address with the republicans.

      My email address was used in a way that was not mentioned on her site. It might not be exactly the same as the other case but you must admit that it comes pretty damn close. I never pressed the fact with her because I had a bigger complaint I was trying to get across, which never happened as my email was never actually read by anyone. When I sent an email disagreeing with her position I would receive an email back thanking me for my support for her position and a list of what I could do to help her get that position across.

      I know my email makes it sound like I am a republican but I am an independent and I vote for the best person regardless of what party they are with. They can be democrat, republican or a third party. Over the past 12 years I can't say I have seen much difference between the two big parties. However I do see the democrats having more of a double standard. I am not saying that republicans don't do this either, I think democrats do it more. I used to be a democrat and I think it hurts the party. Take the abramoff case. The same democrats that are being vocal about how bad this was a few months ago had trips and gifts listed as paid for by lobbyists. This happened during the DeLay investigation and when the press found out this fact these people changed the name of the lobbyist to something else. Get out of jail free card. Maxine Waters refused refund any money or relist her trips with the government. They were still listed as lobbyist paid for, yet no action was taken against her. As far as I am concerned they all should be kicked out of office, republicans and democrats both.

    6. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I had a bigger complaint I was trying to get across, which never happened as my email was never actually read by anyone.

      Well, a hint: If you want to be taken seriously by any politician, you have to use a stamp. The order of "importance" (not that any are necessarily acted upon quickly) is letter, then phone call, then email. Just like most people take a real letter delivered to them as being more important than an email, politicians are the same. Maybe you should take away from this that you should taylor your actions to your audience. Your surprise at having an email ignored and your email added to an email list is humorous.

      However I do see the democrats having more of a double standard.

      Really? I see it the other way around. The Republicans claim "conservatism" and are radical liberals, outspending the Democrats by a huge margin, and pushing through all sorts or progressive legislation. The Democrats voted for the regulations that got Jim Wright (a Democrat) kicked out of the position of House Majority Leader when proposed by Republicans (while under "investigation" not an indictment). The Democrats were for the anti-corruption rules. However, the Republicans repealed their own rules when it applied to a Republican. The weasel bastards didn't care one flip about corruption in politics. They encouraged it within their party. They only cared about punishing people that don't believe the way they do. In both cases, Democrats voted for tighter regulations against corruption, and in both cases the Republicans voted to punish Democrats or help themselves. Neither stance is "conservative".

      The Republicans are the best party at lying. They tell the people what they want to hear. "I can balance the budget by cutting taxes and greatly increasing spending to help you out." For some reason, people prefer the pretty lie to the ugly truth. Taxes would be about 30% lower if the debt was paid off. If you want 30% lower taxes without having to cut a penny, then vote against all Republicans. And no, despite the lies of the Republicans, spending and taxes are not related. If it was the zero-sum game they pretend, then a deficit wouldn't be possible

      I know that makes me sound like a Democrat, but I'm really a conservative in search of a party (and no, the LP isn't an option, but that's another set of posts). I want the government to get the hell out of my private life and my pocket book, and the Republicans want in both, even worse than the Democrats. - Vote Democrat if you are a conservative, they are certainly more conservative than the Republican Party has been since 1988 (and no, I don't vote Democrat that much, but I honestly can't see how a single conservative could vote for the Republicans).

    7. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email address and was added to her political email list. No one even read the email because it thanked me for my support. I was complaining of her support of the issue. However since she is a democrat I doubt anyone would call her on this. Democrats are usually given a pass in matters like this."

      You have a point. When Bill Clinton got a blow job in the White House, they let him get off with some light-hearted impeachment proceedings. When Vice President Dick Cheney shoots someone in the face, all he gets is a weak apology! (Requires MMS player enabled browser. Alternatively go here and choose "A Shot at Redemption.")

      There are, of course, many other examples that support your position with equal veracity!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    8. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by rspress · · Score: 1

      Well, a hint: If you want to be taken seriously by any politician, you have to use a stamp. The order of "importance" (not that any are necessarily acted upon quickly) is letter, then phone call, then email. Just like most people take a real letter delivered to them as being more important than an email, politicians are the same. Maybe you should take away from this that you should taylor your actions to your audience. Your surprise at having an email ignored and your email added to an email list is humorous.

      Actually a few years earlier I sent emails to all my representatives both republicans and democrats including Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein. I sent the exact same email to each one and it was worded very neutrally. Not one democrat responded, not even a form letter. In contrast, every republican not only emailed me back but several called my on the phone and set up meetings with either themselves or their interns. Every republican got back to me. To be fair I sent the email to all the democrats again. Nothing, zero, nada. A few years later when the problem I had came up again on boxers agenda I contacted her again. That's when the newsletters started. I never got a proper reply.

      Really? I see it the other way around. The Republicans claim "conservatism" and are radical liberals, outspending the Democrats by a huge margin, and pushing through all sorts or progressive legislation. The Democrats voted for the regulations that got Jim Wright (a Democrat) kicked out of the position of House Majority Leader when proposed by Republicans (while under "investigation" not an indictment). The Democrats were for the anti-corruption rules. However, the Republicans repealed their own rules when it applied to a Republican. The weasel bastards didn't care one flip about corruption in politics. They encouraged it within their party. They only cared about punishing people that don't believe the way they do. In both cases, Democrats voted for tighter regulations against corruption, and in both cases the Republicans voted to punish Democrats or help themselves. Neither stance is "conservative".

      The Republicans are the best party at lying. They tell the people what they want to hear. "I can balance the budget by cutting taxes and greatly increasing spending to help you out." For some reason, people prefer the pretty lie to the ugly truth. Taxes would be about 30% lower if the debt was paid off. If you want 30% lower taxes without having to cut a penny, then vote against all Republicans. And no, despite the lies of the Republicans, spending and taxes are not related. If it was the zero-sum game they pretend, then a deficit wouldn't be possible

      I know that makes me sound like a Democrat, but I'm really a conservative in search of a party (and no, the LP isn't an option, but that's another set of posts). I want the government to get the hell out of my private life and my pocket book, and the Republicans want in both, even worse than the Democrats. - Vote Democrat if you are a conservative, they are certainly more conservative than the Republican Party has been since 1988 (and no, I don't vote Democrat that much, but I honestly can't see how a single conservative could vote for the Republicans).


      I agree almost totally with what you said. I don't see much differences between the parties. I should clarify it a bit. When I said democrats had a bit more of a double standard I did not limit that to politicians but the party members as well. If I post something calling the democrats on it then I get a reply that says the republicans are worse and they give examples. When I give them examples of democrats doing exactly the same thing then they reply back with a personal attack. If I post, not always on slashdot, that both parties are guilty and should be punished then the democats attack me but I never hear anything from a republican. Both parties are guilty of voting down reform laws. I am all for them....big time.

      I think the debt is so out of control t

    9. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by rspress · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm one in White House, one on private time out of white house. Are you saying that Bill got an accidental blow job? I have had lots of "on purpose" blow jobs but never an accidental one.

      I have been hit with a shotgun blast myself. I was working near duck hunter who did not see me. It stung a little but that was all. The hunter did not do it on purpose....it was a woman, so I did not get upset. Accidents do happen.

      Is there any chance the Cheney will take Hillary hunting?

    10. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Hmmmm one in White House, one on private time out of white house. Are you saying that Bill got an accidental blow job? I have had lots of "on purpose" blow jobs but never an accidental one.

      Well, no, as you dig deeper into the facts, you do bring up important points. Clinton was busy working for the American people, and indeed there was no victim.

      "I have been hit with a shotgun blast myself. I was working near duck hunter who did not see me. It stung a little but that was all. The hunter did not do it on purpose....it was a woman, so I did not get upset. Accidents do happen."

      See, there are more similarities here than even I expected ... I recently got a blow job, and I accidently got scratched by some teeth. The fallator did not do it on purpose ... and it was a woman, so I did not get upset. ;-)

      Back to the point in an attempt to show how the similarities can be just as important as the differences. While the Cheney incident was an accident (there was a victim) that occured while Cheney was not serving the American people (and it arguable if he would have been doing so, even if he shot someone in the face in the oval office), it is my understanding that in both cases, someone was more than happy to be shot in the face ;-) I don't recall Monica Lewinsky apologizing to Bill Clinton for any hardship she caused him, though. I guess that is the real difference ... clearly Cheney hangs out with a more thoughtful compassionate type of folk .... ;-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    11. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Not one democrat responded, not even a form letter. In contrast, every republican not only emailed me back but several called my on the phone and set up meetings with either themselves or their interns.

      And every Republican I've emailed sent back a form letter indicating that emails are never read, but the general contents will be summarized and passed on in a statistical review of all emails received. Oh, and it indicated that if the response is not sufficient, I should send a postal letter. It actually looked very much like the form letter that you get if you send something to the President (and that form letter is consistent across administrations, not related to the party the sitting president is a member of). I can't recall emailing a Democrat in office. I moved from one very-red state to one that is probably the most red state of all. Republicans for all my representation in the state and federal government, as well as the governor - I have no Democrats to email...

      I think the debt is so out of control that no party.....well any of the big two, will never do much about

      Well, under every president prior to Reagan, the debt went down compared to the GNP. Under every Republican since, it went up, under every Democrat since, it went down. From 1980, Democrats always shrink the debt, Republicans always grow the debt.

      California is, well, pretty messed up. The land prices, property tax, and other things are just insane. I like the idea of fixed tax as long as I own property, however, that leads to people holding on to land when they otherwise would sell, driving up prices. If the land isn't sold, it isn't appraised. Any "fix" will probably piss off more than half the state and cause the housing prices to drop quickly, so no one wants to fix the actual problem. Locking taxes into the purchase price was an interesting idea, but it doesn't work as well in the real world and needs to be reexamined.

    12. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by rspress · · Score: 1

      Well, no, as you dig deeper into the facts, you do bring up important points. Clinton was busy working for the American people, and indeed there was no victim.

      It was not really the blow job but the lying to the American people and to the court system. People say Bush did the same. So people should hate both of them for lying. What if Bill had the clap or Herpes...would there have been a victim is Monica contracted an STD?

      See, there are more similarities here than even I expected ... I recently got a blow job, and I accidently got scratched by some teeth. The fallator did not do it on purpose ... and it was a woman, so I did not get upset. ;-)

      That happens to me a lot as well, but I really did get hit by a shotgun blast. I used to hunt as well and when you are hunting you announce where you are if you move out of position. That is part of the hunter safety course that is mandatory for a hunting license.

      Back to the point in an attempt to show how the similarities can be just as important as the differences. While the Cheney incident was an accident (there was a victim) that occured while Cheney was not serving the American people (and it arguable if he would have been doing so, even if he shot someone in the face in the oval office), it is my understanding that in both cases, someone was more than happy to be shot in the face ;-) I don't recall Monica Lewinsky apologizing to Bill Clinton for any hardship she caused him, though. I guess that is the real difference ... clearly Cheney hangs out with a more thoughtful compassionate type of folk .... ;-)

      As far as I am concerned Cheney is ripe for going after for the things he has done but this is not one of them. If the democrat focus on stuff like this it will probably cost them the next election. I hate to say it but Hillary is looking more presidental everyday. I would rather see someone like McCain in office. I have said it before in other forums that if the democrats followed 5 simple rules they would have won both the 2000 and 2004 elections. I would even be willing to share these with the democratic party......for a price. I would even take no money if they were not elected....if they followed the rules I lay down for them. Any takers? I think 1 million is a fair price.

    13. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "It was not really the blow job but the lying to the American people and to the court system. People say Bush did the same. So people should hate both of them for lying. What if Bill had the clap or Herpes...would there have been a victim is Monica contracted an STD?"

      You are missing the point entirely. Perhaps my attempts at satire are confusing the issue. In the both the Clinton and Cheney issues, there was an incedent that was a private issue, having absolutely nothing to do with anything the American people have a right to hear about. In Clinton's case, Ken Starr launched a deep investigation and impeachment proceedings, and in the Cheney incedent, there is no investigation at all, period.

      In an ideal world, Clinton would have just told Ken Starr to go get bent, but he couldn't do that and perform his job as president and uphold the oath he swore to when he took office. He certainly couldn't take the fifth, because that only applies when you might incriminate yourself. When the goal of the prosecutor is to abuse the postion he holds and merely destroy someone's reputation, with no good faith belief that an impeachable crime was commited, Clinton had to be pragmatic and minimize the damage Ken Starr was trying to cause to the effectiveness of the president in a manner that did no more harm to the country than getting a BJ in the oval office.

      The original claim was that Republicans are singled out, and Democrats are not. Clearly, the original point was absurd.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    14. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by rspress · · Score: 1

      I hated Reagan when he was elected. Boy I was pissed but I wound up liking him a lot. The military was in said shape when he became president. Ask anyone who was in the service in the 70's. If the Russians would have started a land war in Europe in the 70's we would have lost big time as we had a hard time keeping our tanks running. I think you will find that Clinton grew the debt as well. Just not as much. I agree that the debt is a bad thing but neither party really cares about it.

    15. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by rspress · · Score: 1

      No, I got the satire.

      I am not saying that one was singled out. I was talking about the abramoff case....well actually a mailing list originally. The point I made about abramoff is that some of the democrats going after the republicans had gifts from lobbyists that the submitted to the government as gifts from lobbyists, then changed them to something else when the press found out.

      Trust me I am not saying one side does it and the other does not.....both sides are guilty of many things. I am just saying that the democrats that I have seen seem to have more double standards....both sides do and there may not be much of a difference but I think there is one. A far as the special prosecutor is concerned it was a bad idea to have one but it was a position that the democrats created and used twice against a president. In all instances it has shown to do little good.

    16. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I think you will find that Clinton grew the debt as well.

      It fell as a percentage of GNP (as I mentioned) and he got the longest string of surpluses since the debt was started. A little while longer with a Democrat in power, and it would have continued to fall, rather than the imperialistic war in Iraq that is unrelated to the safety of the US that will cost somewhere around $1,000,000,000,000.00. But hey, once you are a few trillion in the hole, what's another one?

      Boy I was pissed but I wound up liking him a lot.

      I never knew someone that could say so little in such a long period, and say it in a way you wanted to hear more. More actors for president!

    17. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by rspress · · Score: 1

      The debt still went up...Let's have one that shrinks the debt....period. Doing that would require us to call in all the loans we have been giving to other countries, something no politician is going to do. It would mean both rasing taxes AND cutting services. Neither party will agree to both. We passed a law here in California to stop services to non-citizens to stop the drain on our state budget......our state government chose to ignore the law and still provide those services. Think of that, the people spoke and the government did not listen.

      I was all for removing Saddam from power but not for the same reasons as the current administration. The number one reason is that the UN mandated it. When Saddam tossed the weapon inspectors out he was in violation of the resolution the UN had mandated. No one seemed upset that he had thumbed his nose to what he agreed to do and that the UN had mandated. No one cared that those countries in the UN were doing an end run around the sanctions and were doing business with him anyway. As far as I am concerned we should be out of Iraq now....we have been there way too long.

      Here is a few more things that I am for: Pro-choice!, Anti-Gun laws!, I am for the separation of church and state and consider myself an atheist. That said I hate atheists that treat atheism as a religon, if you band together and try to impose your message on everyone aren't doing the same thing the religons do? Watch Penn & Tellers Bullshit on showtime, I consider them to be about 99 percent inline with my views.

    18. Re:I sent a complaint into Barbara Boxers email by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Let's have one that shrinks the debt....period.

      He was given a huge deficit. He couldn't fix it his first year, as he had to dig out of the hole that Bush Sr. left for him. He reduced the deficit every year, then turned it into a surplus. And even in that action, he had to shut down the government multiple times because Congress wouldn't give him a budget low enough in spending. Tell me the last time a Republican shut down the government because Congress overspent. I understand the point about the debt not becoming smaller under his term, but if he had another 4 years in there, I have no doubt your wish would have come true, even with 9/11, Katrina, and all the other problems Bush uses to blame his fiscal irresponsibility on.

      As far as I am concerned we should be out of Iraq now....we have been there way too long.

      And when we went in, we didn't have an international coalition. "Don't forget Poland" was hilarious in the debates. Bush was too stupid to realize that Kerry was making fun of him, and Bush kept playing right into it. Yes, the massive force of Poland was there with the other forces making up about 10% of the attack that was 90% American. This is an American war of revenge (for Bush Sr losing to Clinton, not revenge for 9/11). If Jr. had ever heard of diplomacy, he would have gotten the UN to lead the attack, with the US providing less than 50% of the forces. Our military wouldn't have been as over-extended as it is now, our losses less, and our costs greatly reduced. But then, he wouldn't have been able to give all those no-bid contracts to the leader's friends (the leader being Dick). And what are we still doing there? They have round after round of elections, and our continued presence is doing more to destabilize Iraq than solidify it. Well, unless you count everyone agreeing that they hate us.

      Here is a few more things that I am for: Pro-choice!, Anti-Gun laws!, I am for the separation of church and state and consider myself an atheist. That said I hate atheists that treat atheism as a religon, if you band together and try to impose your message on everyone aren't doing the same thing the religons do? Watch Penn & Tellers Bullshit on showtime, I consider them to be about 99 percent inline with my views.

      I'm pro-choice, anti-gun-control, anti-drug-war, and mostly fiscally conservative (a conservative realist - no, you can't pretend that private charities will take care of everyone on welfare if social security was disbanded tomorrow), I'm athiest - but I'm a member of a church and can't stand radical athiests any more than radical Christians or Muslims. I've never seen Bullshit - I don't have cable. But I know that Penn and Teller are staunch Republicans. They did a lot of work raising funds, I think they played some fund raisers and such. The government needs to get the hell out of my bedroom and my pocketbook, and both parties want in both (but the Democrats are much less interested in my bedroom than the Republicans)

  58. He should move to Sausalito by Howl · · Score: 1

    Here in Sausalito CA the city routinely sends out mails to large groups of people with the while address list in the To: or CC: field - I now have an almost complete list of the politically important folks in town thanks to the incompetence of our city government (and yes I did tell them repeatedly to use Bcc: or get mailing lit software)

    --
    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a truck load of tapes
    1. Re:He should move to Sausalito by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "Here in Sausalito CA the city routinely sends out mails to large groups of people with the while address list in the To: or CC: field - I now have an almost complete list of the politically important folks in town "

      Are you sure those are really the politically important people in town? Seems to me the movers and shakers would geta phone call, not a mass-distributed email.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  59. Critical mass by Brunellus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Language learning in my experience, requires a certain "critical mass" before it becomes useful, fun, or amusing. Two semesters of anything is rarely enough.

    Add to this the dismal state of language instruction generally, and Latin instruction in particular, in American schools. Most people have almost nothing to show for two semesters of Latin these days: they can't even read or write simple sentences, or have any appreciation for the language, because, frankly, they haven't put enough work in.

    This is true for all language learning in America, I think, and for me, particularly appalling when it comes to Spanish (my other language). Standards are so diluted as to be meaningless, and there is no content to language education. Generations of otherwise-bright kids are being doomed to lives of dull monolingualism, with all of its consequences: intolerance, ignorance, and an inability to compete in the global marketplace.

    1. Re:Critical mass by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      A hundred years ago, if you went to a private school, you learned Latin, Greek and French too.

      Off the top of my head, I think it's fair to say that the decline in taught languages has something to do with the industrialization boom.

      Being a Gentleman and being a businessman were no longer very closely related.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Critical mass by dhakbar · · Score: 1

      "Generations of otherwise-bright kids are being doomed to lives of dull monolingualism, with all of its consequences: intolerance, ignorance, and an inability to compete in the global marketplace."

      Haha! That's retarded!

    3. Re:Critical mass by fr1kk · · Score: 1

      I don't like admitting it, but I took four years (eight semesters?) of latin in high school. Mostly As all the way through. I dont know a lick of latin. I can recognize things and say "oh. that... looks familiar somehow", but thats it. Some kids were able to write, but come on speak? that was out of the question! This was only two years ago.

      --
      sig: Playfully doing something difficult, whether useful or not
    4. Re:Critical mass by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Well if your going to learn a language on top of english i'd imagine something like mandarin would be far more valuable than another a european language.

      we brits and you americans get away with only making a token effort in learning other languages because most of the western world speaks fairly good english.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:Critical mass by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Add to this the dismal state of language instruction generally, and Latin instruction in particular, in American schools. Most people have almost nothing to show for two semesters of Latin these days: they can't even read or write simple sentences, or have any appreciation for the language, because, frankly, they haven't put enough work in.

      This is true for all language learning in America, I think, and for me, particularly appalling when it comes to Spanish (my other language). Standards are so diluted as to be meaningless, and there is no content to language education. Generations of otherwise-bright kids are being doomed to lives of dull monolingualism, with all of its consequences: intolerance, ignorance, and an inability to compete in the global marketplace.

      Because being forced to learn a language, especially a dead language, breeds nothing but the deepest affection towards the culture associated with that language. Yes, instead of learning useless things like engineering, mathematics, physics, history, psychology, or marketing, we should be grinding the plural forms of latin verbs to our brains. We might not have anything sensible to say then, but by golly, we can say it in a language that no one has spoken natively for a thousand years !

      If there's something that's less usefull to learn than philosophy, it's latin. At least philosophy gives you many good examples of why you should step back from your mental constructs every now and then and check if they actually make any sense; and it is very instructive in showing how many weird twists of logic it is possible to make sound almost reasonable when you put your mind to it. But latin has no saving grace, none whatsoever.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    6. Re:Critical mass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Latin is useful. After taking (and Greek) for 3 years in high school it helped enormously with my studies of medicine and biology - all sorts of things I could understand off the top of my head while classmates without it had to struggle to memorize. Helps with your English and learning other modern (Romance) languages too (I can usually read most of Spanish and Italian newspapers without ever having studied those languages, because of my knowledge of Latin and French together).

    7. Re:Critical mass by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      If you speak three languages, you're trilingual
      If you speak two languages, you're bilingual
      If you speak only one language... you're an American.

  60. Hurrah! by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 1

    Loads of tax dollars have been transferred from local government to rich lawyers! Let's all celebrate this wonderful outcome!

    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    1. Re:Hurrah! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Don't blame the lawyers.

      The kid signed up to the city and was almost immediatly sent an email asking for campiagn contribution.
      So the kid wantde to see if there had been an abuse and was denied access.

      Seems like the city screwed up here. specifically the mayor.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  61. The real deal by gregm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The kid signed up for the city's newsletter and was almost immediately sent spam from the mayor's campaign people. Translated, the mayor (whose name I'll not put up in lights) has free access to the city's mailing list and uses it for personal gain. I think he decided to see if get a copy of the list himself and was denied.

    Why should the mayor be allowed to use this list for personal gain but the kid can't? That's why he sued for the info and I expect it's his hope that legislation will get passed to protect that list just like the snailmail addresses are protected by a law that needs to be updated to include email addresses. The kid has a definite past with the mayor. The taxpayers in Kokomo basically paid to make it legal for the mayor to use the city's newsletter list to send everyone on the list spam.

  62. "Kokomo" by Snorpus · · Score: 1, Informative
    While the song may have been used in "Cocktail," I think it dates to the late 60s or maybe early 70s, back when the Beach Boys actually looked like they could ride a surf board.

    1. Re:"Kokomo" by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      "Cocktail", get it? It's a story about bartenders, but it's also a story (a tale) about men. Get it? Get it? Can someone please slam us over the head even harder? Ok, "Pussy Galore" was funny and clever in a campy sort of way. "Octopussy" was just stupid.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:"Kokomo" by indianajones428 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nope, it was recorded in '88 for Cocktail, and was the Beach Boys first #1 hit in 22 years.

      (see these wikipedia articles

      --
      When a thing has been said, and said well, have no scruple. Take it and copy it. --Anatole France
  63. Re: Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, it is bekuse of there inbreeding.

  64. Many law firms require pro bono work by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Many firms require their associates to engage in a certain amount of pro bono work. Wouldn't want people to think they were a binch of venal ambulance chasers, now.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:Many law firms require pro bono work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but ff I'm not mistaken, the American Bar Association requires a certain amount of pro bono work for all attorneys.

      Interesting thing is that any case taken on contingency, where the lawyer only gets paid if the client wins, can count towards their pro bono requirement if the client loses.

  65. The list goes on... by reidman · · Score: 1

    I grew up in Kokomo, but I've lived elsewhere on and off for the past couple of years. I clearly remember one week when I was living in Tucson, and this came on CNN Headline News:

    City pays dog salary to chase ducks

    There it is - my small Indiana hometown on national news...for having a dog on it's payroll. A few days later (after my friends stop laughing at me) I'm watching CNN again, and sure enough, my hometown has made 'headline' news twice in the same week:

    Mysterious Hum Baffles Citizens and Experts

    That's right - the Kokomo Hum .

    And now...our mayor has been defeated by a 16-year-old in a catfight over email addresses. Sweet land of abundance, thy doors have opened - cast away common sense and embrace thy true valor! Onward to inanity!

    1. Re:The list goes on... by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

      Kokomo Hum... Is she related to the infamous Dyna Moe Hum?

      :-P

  66. I don't see where the city did anything wrong by jacquesrk · · Score: 1

    The citizen is accusing the mayor of using the city newsletter mailing list for campaign fund-raising. This has not been proven yet, so I am wiling to give the mayor the benefit of the doubt, using the information in TFA. I think that the city's interpretation of the law was reasonable: e-mail addresses should be treated the same as physical mail addresses, and handed out in the same way. A judge decided that since the law mentioned physical mail addresses and not e-mail addresses, e-mail addresses should be treated differently. I think this is a case where laws written before the advent of electronic communcations need to be rewritten. An e-mail address should be treated (from a legal point of view) the same as a physical address in most cases, and in particular in this case.

  67. We tried, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but the bastard got off (pardon the pun) because he didn't know how to define the word "is". Although that was actually just another instance of his habit of committing perjury.

    1. Re:We tried, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You tried because you didn't like the man's policies. Otherwise, you'd go after people who lie about government activity instead of just their sex lives.
      Just remember: it wouldn't have been perjury unless he'd been put under oath, and he was only put under oath because certain people wanted a scandal.

  68. Dumbass moderators by MaelstromX · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Not that I really care about moderation or need karma, but what a testament to the idiocy of some moderators when my post is modded down -1 redundant while a nearly identical post posted after mine is modded up insightful. Just another reason I read at -1.

    (Special thanks to Tor which allows me to continue posting to Slashdot even after rogue moderation gets me banned.)

    1. Re:Dumbass moderators by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      No seriously, whichever asshole is moderating people redundant on first posts tonight - could you maybe anonymously reply to this topic and explain how in the fuck you think the first or second post in a story can be redundant? Maybe being able to read a fucking dictionary should be a requirement before you're given mod points. Seriously, people.

  69. Re:Pro-bono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dunno,

    Probably the same way that Carl Sagan and John F. Kennedy are still pretentious.

  70. 31337 by Brunellus · · Score: 1

    Tim3t3 ph4cuLt4T3m m34m L4ti|\|4m 3l3ct4m

    ...actually, that looks like it might make a damn good passphrase.

  71. Who foots the bill? by alexo · · Score: 1

    > The city will have to pay not only for the expensive attorneys they hired, but
    > may have to compensate the 16 year old's pro-bono counsel.


    The "city" does not pay anything, it's the citizens that do.

    Administration makes a blunder, residents get punished.

    1. Re:Who foots the bill? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "Administration makes a blunder, residents get punished."

      The citizens blundered when they elected the administration and those who appointed them. That's why they are paying for the administration's mistake.

      Government is not us vs them; it's us vs. the subset of us we elected to speak/act for us.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  72. Re: Indiana by MacBrave · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, I always felt that way about Ohio, not Indiana.........

  73. Yes, let's all blame our parents. by eldavojohn · · Score: 1
    Kudos to you for not putting up with the injustice, but "[Your] parents were making [you] pay for your own food"? Your first call should have been to social services, not the school cafeteria.
    Yes, well said. Run to social services. Some of us grew up in areas where our entire youths were spent laboring away in fields. My medical insurance was MinnesotaCare. The food we ate in the summers were vegetables grown in a garden and meat from an actual butcher down the road.

    Now I know these concepts are very difficult for the information age to understand but this was key to my survival.

    Ever canned or frozen vegetables? Well, I have. No other way we could have made it through the winters.

    Did you ever have to pick rock and bail hay summer after summer? Did you ever skip school to pour cement or frame houses? Ever have to do this during the day while bussing/waiting/bartending in a restaraunt at night?

    Not all of us have had easy lives. My parents weren't making me buy my own food--there really wasn't another choice. I've bought my own clothes most of my life, taught myself how to cut my own hair and haven't ever thought twice about blaming my parents. I know what money really is.

    Luckily, the job I work today is lucrative. My parents didn't provide me financial resources. They didn't provide me with contacts to get the perfect job. They didn't even provide me music or the arts. What they did instill on me was a sense of working hard without complaining and knowing that nothing outweighs the value of knowledge. Not even money. Grade school was hard, high school was hard, college was even worse (no garden!) but today I feel like I live like a king even though my idea of a great meal is a can of campbell's Steak and Potato soup with any kind of multi-grain bread. People ask me sometimes if a full time job is hard to juggle with full time grad school. Not at all. Hell, the buildings I work in are air conditioned.

    I'm not claiming to have life as hard as The Grapes of Wrath and I don't mean to be preachy. I remember my childhood more as Dandelion Wine or Something Wicked This Way Comes more than anything else. There have been generations of Americans before me that lived off the land and there probably are many more out there that still do. If you think it is so abhoring to live life like that, you're mistaken. Sometimes I miss it so much, I'll most likely find myself an old man living in the middle of nowhere on a plot of land at the end of my life.

    Kudos to you for thinking that I deserve "better," but I've never asked for it and I never would.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Yes, let's all blame our parents. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      You sir are exactly what I still love about this country!

  74. Existing law not applied = bad by jan+de+bont · · Score: 1
    It's nice to see a "Citizen" win against "The Man..." but...

    This ruling basically stated that an existing law wherein the city can keep snail-mail addresses confidential does not cover e-mail addresses. Is this not the exact opposite of what we on ./ typically preach? We typically advocate that the courts and legislature not make a big deal about cyberspace issues that are covered by existing laws; rather, we prefer they apply existing law? Right?

    In this case, the court said e-mail addresses were not covered by the confidentiality rules. So, now, with this precedent; what a can of worms.

  75. L4tin 133t... k3wl by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    But wouldn't that be m1111\/m rather than m34m?

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:L4tin 133t... k3wl by Brunellus · · Score: 1

      actually, in hindsight, it probably should have been MxXx|\/m or MxXx||||m (although the latter use is deprecated)

  76. Re: Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Takes one to know one, apparently.

  77. Small town cops and politicians by VampireByte · · Score: 1

    Check out this story and see how a guy's on death row for protecting himself in his own home from a local cop's son. Yes, that's on the Fox News website, not exactly a liberal organization. We should all be afraid of this abuse of authority.

    --

    Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

  78. Tell Mellencamp that... by mliikset · · Score: 1

    ...he'll laugh you to death.

  79. How did you miss _that_?! by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 1
    \As I see this, this ruling is not a good thing. Bravo for the kid being victorious against the man and all, but boo hiss for society as a whole...

    There is a law protecting the mailing addresses of city employees. Kokomo denied a request for e-mail addresses based on this law. The judge found that e-mail addresses were not covered by that law. In other words, what isn't legal in normal post-mail isn't necessarily illegal in e-mail.

    I'm not quite sure what the repercussions will be, but this certainly will make for a more complicated system in Indiana.

    ::Colz Grigor

  80. Don't worry by quokkapox · · Score: 1
    I think I need more coffee this morning. And maybe a lobotomy so I can forget the late 80s/early 90s once and for all.

    You're not alone. Don't worry, be happy.

    The booze doesn't seem to be working.

    Have you tried red, red wine?

    Dammit, if I'm gonna suffer, some of you will have to suffer along with me :)

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
  81. Well, it seems I beat all of you. by thebellmaster1x · · Score: 1

    Not only do I live in Kokomo, this kid is my best friend. I sit next to him in Chemistry and at lunch.

    --
    "If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe." -Carl Sagan, "Cosmos"
  82. Pomade by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    I don't want Fop, goddamn it! I'm a Dapper Dan man!

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  83. I've been /.ed! by RyanNees · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to see that this has sparked such interest. I'll try to respond to some of your comments here... First, my attorney essentially put up the capital to take on the case. It wasn't entirely pro bono, per se, because Indiana has special laws about cases involving the Access to Public Records Act. In 1998, our Governor established the Office of the Public Access Counselor, which was billed as a kind of watchdog organization for members of the public and their questions about access. When I was initially denied my request, I filed a formal complaint with the PAC office; they issued an opinion in my favor. However, the office has no binding capability, and the city continued to ignore that decision. If a citizen does take the denying agency to court and wins, after obtaining a favorable opinion from the PAC which was disregarded, said denying agency must pay the citizen's legal bills. That's the only "tooth" that the Legislature built into the PAC law. I couldn't afford to put up the thousands of dollars needed to take the case to court (even though I knew I'd ultimately get it back), so an attorney from Indianapolis contacted me to take the case. As a matter of public policy, I've thought all along that e-mail addresses should be exempted from the APRA. This case was not about me wanting the e-mails for any use...it was all about enforcing the law as it's written. Having said that, I'm very pleased that the attention this case has garnered has led to lawmakers at the Statehouse amending the APRA so that e-mail addresses would not have to be disseminated by government agencies. So ultimately (and it would have likely not happened if it weren't for this case), that loophole will be closed. When I received the campaign e-mails from the mayor--after signing up for the city-related list--I contacted the Indiana Elections Division, thinking that he might be breaking the law, using city resources for his reelection campaign. I was told to fear not, as the e-mails were merely public record, and McKillip would have equal rights to access them as anyone else. That's the reason I filed the request in the first place...just to test the theory. When the city continued to stonewall my request, despite the law being so clearly out of their favor, I filed suit. Simply because McKillip disagreed with the law did NOT mean he could flagrantly break it. I think that probably covers most of the common questions. I'll try to monitor the thread and respond to whatever thoughts you have. And don't hesitate to contact me through my website (which has a pretty detailed accounting of all of this as well), RyanNees.com.

  84. Microcosm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like a sedated microcosm of the Bush/Cheney consortium, where a new travesty is bemoaned every day without anyone taking action.

  85. Wait a minute... by Jetson · · Score: 1
    Bermuda - check.
    Bahamas - check.
    Pretty mamas - i'm a geek; I can only dream
    Key Largo - check
    Montego - check

    Wait a minute... Kokomo is in Indiana? I feel like I've been ripped off!

  86. Proud Kokomo Citizen!!! by chasdkirby · · Score: 1

    I know my tax dollars are paying the legal bills in this case, but I am fine with it! I would much rather my money go towards blocking a mayor I do not support solicate me to vote for him than to pay for the half million dollar round-a-bouts the mayor wants to place in unneccessary intersections. Ryan may have done this in an unconventional way, but in the end it will accomplish what he set out to do. Keep up the good work kid!