Slashdot Mirror


Tech Workers in Higher Demand

mjdroner writes "CNN has a story on an employment consulting firm report showing job cuts in the tech sector are down 40 percent." From the article: "Despite the inevitable job-cutting that typically follows mergers, the job market picture for the nation's tech workers is definitely improving. Many job seekers in high-demand fields such as storage systems administration and information security are probably finding themselves in the driver's seat when it comes to negotiating employment terms"

325 comments

  1. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So this "good news" is that people are getting laid off at a slightly lower rate?

    1. Re:Wait... by Oblio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What an odd use of the english language.

      Better than bad does not equal good.

      Trend analysis can be beneficial, but I don't think it would impact someone looking for a job (or even just hoping for better negotiating position).

      obSimpsons:
      "but it comes with a free frogurt"
      "that's good!"
      "but the frogurt is also cursed"
      "that's bad!"

      --
      Pax -- Ob
    2. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it sounds so good. As opposed to saying that jobs cuts are down to 10% instead of the 20% a year ago. This is a "Mission Accomplished" kind of thing.

    3. Re:Wait... by moochfish · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rather than firing 200 truck loads of IT staff this month, we're only firing 120 truck loads!!! Celebrate!

    4. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we're all going to have to take your word for it.

      thanks!

    5. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Percentage wasn't low enough for me, I'm getting laid off this Friday.

      Oh yeah, outsourcing is GREAT!

    6. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There seems to be a propaganda push on right now, which was started a couple days ago by the article telling us that we shouldn't be worried about 5% outsourcing and 600,000 H1B workers to be approved in the Congress and how CS is a great major and that we should study it...

  2. Despite the inevitable job-cutting that typically follows mergers, the job market picture for the nation's tech workers is definitely improving.

    After the rain comes sunshine. News at 11...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  3. job cuts are down! by wfberg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "job cuts in the tech sector are down 40 percent." Great statistic! Now what on earth does it mean for the actual amount of jobs? And job seekers?

    This sort of statistic sound like it might be due to the increase in growth not slowing down as fast...

    In other words; hard, useless, figures.

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:job cuts are down! by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Once they finally cut all the jobs, the next year they can crow about NO JOB CUTS!

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    2. Re:job cuts are down! by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      "job cuts in the tech sector are down 40 percent." Great statistic! Now what on earth does it mean for the actual amount of jobs?

      Of course it's meaningless without the information on how many new tech sector jobs were created. Wihtout that, as everyone has pointed out, this article is just plain stupid.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:job cuts are down! by DrCode · · Score: 1

      The rate of increase of unemployment is decreasing.

      Take enough derivatives, and eventually you'll get a rate that looks like an improvement.

    4. Re:job cuts are down! by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      Actually, that same sort of description (sans the exact percentage) could be used with regard to the solar output of our sun.

      Not a good sign with our sun, and probably not a good sign about future employment - as the majority of next hires will be what it was last year, either IT workers in foreign countries, or foreign IT workers imported to America by the traitorous corps.

  4. I suppose... by bigattichouse · · Score: 5, Funny

    I suppose "slightly less doom" in the world is reason to celebrate too.

    "Ahh.. but he's only stabbing me in *ONE* eye with an icepick now!"

    --
    meh
    1. Re:I suppose... by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1, Funny

      Slightly less doom seems like the perfect slogan for a reformed Microsoft.

      -Grey

  5. sweet by ndruw1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    lets just hope its still that way when I get out of college in 5 or so years

    (That's right, I'm in highschool - hold you flames please :) )

    1. Re:sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold YOUR flames please. -15 for grammar, and you don't get to park in the school parking lot anymore. You can spend lunch cleaning my classroom for extra credit.

    2. Re:sweet by fistfullast33l · · Score: 1

      Three things come to mind about your comment (but aren't directed right at you):

      1. The odds of you starting and ending college majoring in the same thing are about 50/50 based on no statistics whatsoever. I give you 20/80 if you are starting an engineering degree at a liberal arts school.
      2. When I started college, tech was huge (and I wasn't majoring in it). When I went to grad school, the bubble burst (and I went for CS). I just graduated with my Master's and everyone is hiring again. I loosely paid attention because I loved what I was doing. Moral of the story: don't go into a field based on hiring statistics.
      3. Go to graduate school right out of undergrad. My salary is $20,000 higher versus people with an undergraduate degree in the same field from the same school. It also makes you much more desirable in most science and tech fields and it's cheaper in the long run. I was relatively young in my program and most of the people that I met were either further along but like me (went straight to grad school after undergrad) or were professionals using their IRA's to go back. This is definitely a more costly way to do things because a)you're using your retirement savings including a penalty and b)if you do go back when your older, try to get your company to pay for it.
    3. Re:sweet by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I agree wholeheartedly... it took me three years to get my Masters (I was working my way through), but I've already recouped what I lost in salary and then some. Moreover, and this is probably the most important thing, I worked as a research assistant and actually accomplished a lot of cool things. I'm convinced I was hired not because of my degree, but because of what I accomplished during those years.

      I went into graphics, and had a lot of cool stuff to show for it at the end, which is a perfect example of doing what you WANT to do and not doing something because you think it'll pay well. Other friends of mine had the same experiences... one went into games programming (which is labor of love... you have to really love labor) after writing and releasing several pretty decent shareware games. It's all about doing what you want.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    4. Re:sweet by vertinox · · Score: 1

      From a person who had 7 years worth of IT crap...

      For the love of god... Don't go into IT.

      Become a lawyer, Astro-physist, robotics engineer, or something that is either cool or pays you like a human being.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    5. Re:sweet by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      Go to graduate school right out of undergrad.

      Obviously, YMMV, but this can actually be a VERY BAD idea. By the time I finished my BS degree, I was pretty burned out on school, and took a few years to "recharge" my batteries before going back to get a master's. I also know a guy who went straight to grad school, spent 1.5 semesters in, then dropped out b/c he was burned out. Of course, I also know a guy that went straight to law school, got his JD, went straight to library school, got his MLS, and is now a Law Librarian (after not quite a decade of straight schooling, including summers), which is what he wanted to do since before graduating high-school. And of course, there is the guy that "took a year off" before his senior (or maybe junior, I forget) year who is now a career bartender.

      So, yeah, different strokes for different folks and all that.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
  6. Misleading headline by jrumney · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shouldn't the headline read "Tech Workers in Lower lack of Demand"?

  7. Consulting by kevin_conaway · · Score: 4, Informative

    Many consulting and defense firms have been hiring tech workers non-stop for a long time now. Especially in the D.C. Metro area.

    1. Re:Consulting by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's called "building the police state". No thanks. I will not participate in ending the Jefersonian dream. I will not make my own prison. I will not build machines to imprison my nation.

    2. Re:Consulting by wfberg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, the best way to wreck a system is from within. Just look at all the stoners who're wreaking their revenge at the DMV by taking a job there..

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    3. Re:Consulting by capnchicken · · Score: 1

      If you're the one building it, you're the one building the back-doors as well :)

      --
      A libertarian shat on my carpet once. Claimed the free market would sort it out. -Ford Prefect(8777)
    4. Re:Consulting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you always engage in so much hyperbole? Can you give an example of how working at any of the aforementioned companies contributes to a "police state"?

    5. Re:Consulting by Manuscript+Replica · · Score: 1

      That's quite a soapbox you're standing on! Plenty of us in the DC area have nothing to do with government contracts or other government work, such as the small ISV I work for.

    6. Re:Consulting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I've recently been hired by one of these firms and I hate the notion that we are helping "build a police state" or whatever military is evil catch phrase you can come up with. I am a liberal democrat opposed to Bush, wire taping, the war in iraq, etc. The fact of the matter is defense is a requirement for any nation, especially one the size of the US and with our influence in world politics. I am glad to be doing a job that protects our country, and I am pleased that someone like myself, who supports peace and diplomacy, is doing this job (and most of my co-workers share similar political views to mine).

    7. Re:Consulting by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      The Jeffersonian draeam of an agrarian economy? That's been gone since the combustion engine.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    8. Re:Consulting by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

      I will not build machines to imprison my nation.

      Sadly, someone else will. It's really the same dynamic when some labour union decides to go on strike these days. Does it "really" affect the business, when they can do so many other things to mitigate the damage? It admirable that you've taken a stance, but, it may be in vain.

    9. Re:Consulting by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      The key element of the Jeffersonian democracy was many wealthy people- but a lack of people like modern billionaires and corporations (which are like immortal artificial people without souls).

      Jefferson's democracy and libertarian society breaks down when there are a small subclass of fantastically powerful/wealthy people with no one to counterbalance them.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    10. Re:Consulting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually people it's called attrition.

      most of these firms are very well known for their ability to chew up and spit out their talent pool. They do not cultivate their talent, they hire it away from other jobs.

      LMCO actually has a well known (and publically reported) attrition of 30% of their employees in that area yearly. Frighteningly, in the industry they are better known for their cheap and replaceable workforce than for their products.

      Why are they hiring? In honesty, they're not really. They're trying to replace their employees who are going to work for other companies for more $ (usually the govt.). And most of those jobs are going unanswered since they move so slowly in hiring (hence the additional backlog).

    11. Re:Consulting by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      You may not be building wire-taps, but you are supporting the Military Industrial Complex. One of the main reasons why I hate the Bush administration is that they are funneling tax payers' money into the defense industry, much more so than is required. I'm sorry, but you are not helping protect our country. You're simply draining our nation of its resources, which would be put to better use in education, healthcare, or social services.

    12. Re:Consulting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The key element of the Jeffersonian democracy was many wealthy people

      And slaves for a little lovin' on the side. Don't forget that!

    13. Re:Consulting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a friend who used to work at anderson (now accenture) and he had a hole the size of rhode island in his stomach. He pulled 60+ hour work weeks, barely saw his fiancee, ate frozen dinners & lunches, was paid peanuts for 2-3 years, before he finally got burnt out. The turn around rate at these types of places are insane, because they intentionally burn out the lower ranks while doing nothing to retain the talent.

  8. When will facts match reality... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A relentless stream of "IT is great" news... yet a lot of folks I know are struggling (I'm doing okay but worry if I lost my current position).

    So I just don't believe this news and I think there is some kind of agenda behind it. Perhaps the big IT companies want to head things off because they finally see a big crunch is coming and they are going to need skilled IT people again.

    I would love to see things turn good again in this field but I'm not seeing it at the ground level yet (10+ years experience-- in the South).

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:When will facts match reality... by hal2814 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IT is a pretty broad designation. The US is a pretty big place. If you're not seeing this growth then you're either in the wrong place or the wrong branch of IT. I'm a software developer in the Atlanta area. Until I settled down with my current employer a few months ago, I was getting asked to interviews quite a bit. The people I am with now saw my resume on a Thursday, interviewed me that Friday and offered the job the following Monday. They even offered $5K a year more than I asked for. They found my resume on a job site. I was never even aware of them until they contacted me. That's as easy as I've ever had it.

    2. Re:When will facts match reality... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to see things turn good again in this field but I'm not seeing it at the ground level yet (10+ years experience-- in the South).

      I think it's because you're NOT at the ground level. You have 10+ years of exeperience. I am graduating from college this year and had no problems finding a high paying offer. They were all in the consulting world though.

    3. Re:When will facts match reality... by ShannaraFan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll back that up. On January 17th, my boss and I "had words" and I quit my job as Senior DBA. I agreed to stay until the 24th to document some processes and transfer knowledge to one of the junior DBA's. I did three interviews on the 25th, was offered two of those positions on the 26th, accepted one, got a counter-offer from the other, then a counter-counter-offer from the first, started work there on the 30th, again as a Senior SQL DBA. I don't think it would have been this easy a year ago.

    4. Re:When will facts match reality... by 68k+geek · · Score: 1

      I must agree with the parent - I've found it quite easy to find a job as a programmer, and so have many of my friends.

    5. Re:When will facts match reality... by avronius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For the record, years of experience in "IT" do not adequately illustrate how desirable your skill set may be to a prospective employer.

      I can point to three people that I work closely with. Each has "10 years of experience in IT". One has been doing desktop support exclusively on the Windows environment, one is a UNIX systems administrator, and one is a Windows systems administrator. Each is very good at what they do. As the months pass, one or another of them is offered a new position with a different company, doing interesting work within their area of expertise. This has been consistent for the past three years.

      I can point to 11 others who do similar jobs, but haven't received a reasonable job offer in three years. The differences don't appear to be what they do, or even how well they do their jobs, as much as how flexible they have proven themselves to be.

      As expected, those "IT Professionals" with the widest skill sets seem to be the ones that are most in demand. Failing that, those that have experience in multiple industries appear to be the next most desirable.

      Be proactive in defining your career direction, and flexible in the industries that you practice in. You will find that you are more likely to be considered for those available "IT positions". If your work history proves that you are flexible and adaptable, a prospective employer may be interested in training you in new technologies that interest you.

      This rant is a bit off-topic, but "years of experience" is a pet peeve of mine. It is not meant as a slant on the parent of this post. Although, I'd be interested to know what "big IT companies" would benefit from suggesting that IT jobs are more in demand now than before. It seems to me that it would cause a rate jump during a market shortage, rather than continuing with the age old fear mongering techniques of suggesting that you can be replaced before you make it to the curb.

    6. Re:When will facts match reality... by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Do you think your popularity might have had something to do with your work experence?

      Some of us had to pick up dead useless jobs in IT. I'd like to get into DBA, but all, ALL of the job posts I've seen are for senior DBAs.

      Except for the ones who want a senior DBA and then call it an entry level position.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    7. Re:When will facts match reality... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Let's put it this way...

      As/400, Java, Websphere, C, C++, Unix, RPG, Cobol, Lisp, Pascal, Assembly...
      Project Lead, Developer, Microsoft Project. I am proactive but all the proactive in the world doesn't help me when 50% of our IT people are now indian (with 30% onshore and 70% offshore) and I know it is a race between their inflation and ours whether I remain employed or not. It doesn't matter how skilled I am if management can find an equally skilled person who is willing to work for $30k per year.

      People with 7 years in accounting, have a skill. People with 7 years in IT don't unless they got lucky with regard to hot technology. Most of my friends from college missed one of the many turns (java being the recent one) and boom- they were out on their ass.

      Again- I know a lot of hard working people whose life experience is NOT matching these recent news stories. So I suspect an agenda is behind them - not that things are really changing yet. I -do- think things will change in 6-10 years but many more of us will be SOL before then.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    8. Re:When will facts match reality... by IceFalcon · · Score: 1

      In the security field there is some growth. I receive calls all the time. Unfortunately the positions are in the big cities. Commutting hell!

    9. Re:When will facts match reality... by avronius · · Score: 1

      It is depressing that such a large percentage of software development has been off-shored. Sadly, it seemed to be the next logical step in the ever-evolving business model (after out-sourcing).

      Functionality, practicality, flexibility, value and sustainability, are all key factors for any business decision. Until -all- of these can be realized here (in my case, Canada), off-shoring will continue to be a viable option for companies trying to remain competitive in their various industries.

      Our jobs will always be in jeopardy (to some degree) for various financial reasons. If the market stops buying the products that our companies produce, our companies may close, and we will be out of work. This can occur for a plethora of reasons, ranging from competitors with better products, to competitors with better prices.

      It is our responsibility to ensure that we provide the highest level of service (uptime/quality code/exemplary service) that we can. This is always the case - not just when jobs are scarce and the fear of off-shoring hangs over our heads, but should be the case all of the time.

      They say that the key to success is to find a niche and fill it. Sometimes it's as simple as applying ourselves to the tasks at hand and saving (or earning) real money for the companies that we work for.

    10. Re:When will facts match reality... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
      Except for the ones who want a senior DBA and then call it an entry level position.

      Saw this about 1.5 years ago... Turned my stomach.

      Help Wanted: Database Administrator/Web Programmer with mix of programming/admin experience. Minimum 4 years IT experience, 2 years DBA. Programming Languages: HTML, PHP, C, VB.net, SQL, and Stored Procedures Salary $26,900, firm. American Legion Post x.

      Yup, the legion was looking for a DBA who could do all of that and wanted to pay under $30k. What's funny is it only ran in the paper ONE time, so presumably they found somebody who wanted the job. So either they got some dude who lived in his parents basement and learned SQL Server by setting it up on an old PII laptop, or the job market was crappy enough they could find somebody with the exact experience they wanted in dire enough straits to say "Okay."
      --
      Who did what now?
    11. Re:When will facts match reality... by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 0

      Hehe, no job description like thta mean exactly one thing - satisfying government requirements for getting a h1b to fill the position. No local talent for the job means they can bring in the indian guy.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    12. Re:When will facts match reality... by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      My work experience started in late 2001. The dot-com bubble had already burst and my professors spent a good chunk of my senior year warning us that the good times were over and it would be very hard to find a job right after graduation. I did find a job though. It paid a lot less (~= $7K per year less) than the only other offer I could find but the job I took was a jack of all trades position with the government that would at least get more experience under my belt than the other offer (UNIX support desk for a call center) which was much more of a "dead end." I stayed at the government job until the economy got better (even survived a round of layoffs with the government of all places) and then took another jack of all trades position that focused more on my preference: software development. I stayed there until I got the aforementioned job offer as a software developer (without all the other stuff like DB maintenance, tech support, and server maintenance to worry about).

      In short, I had to do a lot of other stuff I wasn't interested in before I garnered enough experience to be a full-fledged software developer. If you want to be a DBA but don't have the experience, then you need to find a job where you can do what you do have experience for that has some DBA work to do on the side, even if you're only a backup to the regular DBA. You're right that you're not going to up and decide to be a DBA one day and find a company willing to pay to train on the job. Those days still haven't come back and probably never will again.

    13. Re:When will facts match reality... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
      Hehe, no job description like thta mean exactly one thing - satisfying government requirements for getting a h1b to fill the position. No local talent for the job means they can bring in the indian guy.

      Sadly, this is probably the case... Makes it even more despicable because by farming off to an H1-B they guarantee they won't be hiring a serviceman who moves to civillian life--despite the fact that many Legion staffers used to be career-military. Maybe they forgot how great it was to get a job working with other servicemen?
      --
      Who did what now?
  9. Huh? by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How does 'decrease in job cuts' equal 'higher demand for IT workers'? That's like saying I've gone from spending £10,000 more than I earn a month to spending only £5,000 more a month so obviously my savings are getting better.

    -Grey

    1. Re:Huh? by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      This must be a European thing, cause that is exactly what it means to us in the US... Our economy is exploding, and the government is doing great, since we only overran the budget this year by something like $400 Billion dollars, and were projected to go over $500 Billion dollars. So, obviously, its time for another tax cut (or new programs) to give back some of the "savings" to us taxpayers. Are you sure your not an american politician?

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    2. Re:Huh? by 3770 · · Score: 1

      No,

      It is like saying. You have gone from spending $1K per month instead of $2K per month. Full stop.

      If you are making $500 per month you are still losing money.
      If you are making $1500 per month you are now making money, whereas before you were losing money
      If you are making $2500 then you were making money all along, but you are making more money now.

      The headline does not state whether the rate at which people are hired, are higher or lower than the rate at which people are fired.

      --
      The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
  10. This is sort of like... by EmagGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    saying "they're cutting medicare!!" because they are increasing spending by 7% instead of 9%..

    The fact that they're being laid off at simply a slower rate doesn't make me feel like they're in higher demand. It could just as easily mean that they've run out of people to lay off.

    1. Re:This is sort of like... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      One problem with your comparison is the price of medical care goes up double digits per year. Another problem is the number of people on medicare goes up every year.

      If you leave the budget the same, that is less money per person to buy more expensive care. In other words, doubly less health care per person.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    2. Re:This is sort of like... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Of course, medicare wouldn't even be necessary if not for the fact that people don't exercise one shred of actual personal responsibility and rather expect everyone else to carry their weight when they don't feel it is important to actually plan for retirement...

      grumble grumble...

    3. Re:This is sort of like... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      Yea, or if we simply didn't have poor people who got sick. God, I hate those people!

    4. Re:This is sort of like... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      I see you do not understand how Medicare works. You are confusing two government programs: Medicare and Medicaid.

      Medicare is the insurance program that ALL citizens are required to have after their retirement age. People are required by law to use Medicare for medical coverage after their retirement age. They are not allowed to carry their own health insurance coverage and no private company offers insurance coverage to citizens who have achieved their retirement age. This is a mandatory socialist program whose sole purpose is to deny as much medical coverage to retirees as possible. There are premiums associated with Medicare because to fund medicare fully with public funds would be astronomically expensive. Premiums for people who have not contributed FICA taxes for 40 quarters run about the same cost as a private health plan would (about $400/mo all told). This is alarming given that these premiums are a very small amount of how much money Medicare gets from the government, and is an indicator of just how much money is wasted. Pretty much every penny that the government spends on Medicare is wasted on bureaucracy and fraud - and actual medical costs are paid by the premiums. It disgusts me.

      Medicaid, which is indeed a subpart of Medicare, is the medical program for the poor. Medicaid covers impoverished people regardless of age, but rather according to their income and assets. I don't so much have a problem with Medicaid. Some people are poor for reasons beyond their control (illness, involuntary disability, etc) and I don't mind helping them out. It's the people who choose to be poor that I am complaining about; people who choose to do poorly in school, choose to not learn to do something valuable; choose not to have ambition; and choose to live off of other peoples' hard work.

      Having grown up in a welfare community in New York City, I have first hand experience of the mentality behind living on public assistance. There is a profound "us vs. them" attitude and believe it or not, the prevailing attitude, at least in my community, was that they wanted to get as much public money as possible to "punish" the successful for being successful. I was glad to get out of there.

      I don't hate poor people. I just don't respect the ones who choose to be that way and then expect me to carry them along.

  11. No, its just raining softer by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Job cuts down != improvement in employment.

    Job cuts are down by 40% but that still means jobs were cut which still means that there is less employment.

    Our fantastic contributors are not the only people that are this stupid. The same trick is used to manipulate national debt news. There is a diffierence between debt and deficit. When the deficit decreases then the government crows about having control of debt. Not so. Deficit is the amount that the debt grows by. Therefore even if the deficit reduces, the debt is still increasing.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:No, its just raining softer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Not to mention the old trick of referring to when a government program receives a smaller raise than the previous year as a "cut". The rate of growth is cut, but it's still a raise. But you can't use logic on a journalist. They joined the profession to be activists, not to think.

      The article serves two purposes:
      1. The misleading (untrue) headline gets CNN page hits
      2. It gives the U.S. IT worker advance notice to begin lubing up for the coming screwing again via the H1-B program
    2. Re:No, its just raining softer by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 1
      Not to mention the old trick of referring to when a government program receives a smaller raise than the previous year as a "cut". The rate of growth is cut, but it's still a raise. But you can't use logic on a journalist. They joined the profession to be activists, not to think.
      A budget increase in a government program can be considered a cut if the program's need increases at a greater rate than the budget increase.

      Real world example, I invite a couple of friends to my place for a BBQ. I buy a couple six-packs of beer and we have a good time.

      The next week, I invite a dozen friends over and I buy three six-packs of beer. While I did buy more beer, each person received less beer than those who attended the previous week. I didn't buy enough beer to have a good time.

      Moral: get a keg.

      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    3. Re:No, its just raining softer by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      A budget increase in a government program can be considered a cut if the program's need increases at a greater rate than the budget increase.

      Yes, but only in government programs. And only when republicans are in control.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    4. Re:No, its just raining softer by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      Yes, but only in government programs. And only when republicans are in control.

      Nah, I consider myself a current-Republican-party-hater and even I'll say without reservation that the Democrats do the exact same thing.

      You aren't going to get any honesty in government finances (if ever) until you run them up against a really hard spending limit, like a Constitutionally-mandated government fixed spending limit, where the legislators are forced to balance their desire for pork against against actually paying for really important infrastructure support.

    5. Re:No, its just raining softer by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      Job cuts down != improvement in employment.

      Job cuts are down by 40% but that still means jobs were cut which still means that there is less employment.

      No, not really. It's not the rate at which the total number of jobs is changing which has changed. It's the number of jobs that are cut. To compare it to finances, it's analogous to cutting your expenses. If your expenses are still greater than your income after the cut, you are still in a bad position. But even if so, you are still in a better position than you would be if your expenses didn't fall.

    6. Re:No, its just raining softer by shaitand · · Score: 1

      True enough, but a reduction in the rate that the IT market flushes down the toilet is hardly saying that IT is hot. IT does have to reach bottom at some point.

    7. Re:No, its just raining softer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be raining softer, but the rain is just as yellow.

      Oh no, the pace of IT downsizing is slowing down!! We gotta get more H1B's into the country right now before the market turns around at all and salaries go up even in the most minute sense!!

      After all, we can't delay Bill Gates' next billion in profit, now can we???

  12. That good I make $25K with CS degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I graduated from a top CS program Spring 2005 and landed a 25K job in Central Pennsylvania...should I move?

    1. Re:That good I make $25K with CS degree by 3nd32 · · Score: 1

      I would have to say... yes. I'm a freshman in college, majoring in CS. I'm earning a comparable amount with a part-time internship. This is in Boise, Idaho.

    2. Re:That good I make $25K with CS degree by patio11 · · Score: 1

      Know your worth on the market. My school has a department-wide salary survey, so I knew the median for a CS graduate was $55k and thats the number I had in my head during the job search. I eventually took a job with a much lower salary abroad but which came with a compensation package which makes my take-home pay pretty competitive to that ("free housing, we pay all your taxes" has a way of adding up pretty fast). At $25k in the US, assuming you've got any level of programming/technical skills you are getting almost unbelievably exploited. I used to work in data entry -- your job responsibilities are "get paper from fax machine, hit three keys to open up new record in database, type what you see without making too many errors, repeat for 8 hours" -- and my salary would have been about $26k annualized, and that was in Illinois (the company drew mainly workers from two reasonable-to-live-in Chicago suburbs).

  13. slashdot by fusto99 · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they count people getting cut for reading slashdot instead of doing their job?

    1. Re:slashdot by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if they count people getting cut for reading slashdot instead of doing their job?

      Oh... you mean slashdot isn't my job?

      ::looks around::

      So just what am I supposed to do in front of this computer all day then?

      -Grey

  14. From an employer by dada21 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've run my IT consulting business now for almost 20 years, a succesful business in the Midwest that has extended past. We ignored the dotcom boom (and bust), we grew slowly but surely, and we focus on showing our customers a profitable return on every investment they make in us.

    We can't find good workers. I've interviewed repeatedly and found the new talent is terrible -- it seems that has technology becomes more "known," the amount of GOOD talent is dropping. I've interviewed some people from top colleges that just don't know their way around a business at all, and I have no desire to train them in exchange for a high 5 figure salary.

    The only way I seem to find valuable employees is by picking up the real outcasts from the larger consulting firm -- outcasts that have great insight and work ethic but are too far outside the box to fit in any MBA-run company. Every time a consulting group goes under, the same morons get new jobs with the next company that won't exist in 10 years.

    For those in the same position, what are you doing for hiring? I don't see talent coming out of college and moving to the Midwest (a very profitable IT sector), most are instead moving to the west coast, taking a big salaried job, and finding themselves stuck in a very expensive area where the high salary doesn't seem to overcome the overhead of living there (stress, costs, traffic). I'd love to find a resource for good employees, but I guess the answer is right there: good employees don't get fired. The balance between efficiency and knowledge and salary is not something I worry about -- if my customers realize a gain on the money they spend on us, I have no problem paying the person right. For those who know, most of my employees work at minimum wage with a large project bonus (up to 80%), and I have enough people looking to work for us that it isn't the pay structure that isn't helping me find good help.

    Also, it seems that many people going to college for computer science/engineering aren't even learning the basics -- what colleges have you recent graduates gone to that have taught you real consulting skills, business sense and responsibility?

    1. Re:From an employer by Badgerman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here's a bit of a contrast from what I've seen - I left the midwest for the west coast (IT Project Manager).

      The big problem is getting people to move. Regions change and shift and grow, and one of the terrible problems is that to get talent, you may have to get it from somewhere else. I worked with one company who, essentially, raided a neighboring state for talent. Even if the job count stays the same, the type changes.

      And it'll all shift again. Five years ago, pre-9/11 my home state was hopping. Post-9/11 it never fully recovered, several changes affected the job markets, and people began leaving - me with them. Now, having moved, ironicaly, I'm gettng leads. Maybe it'll change in a few years, or maybe I'll end up having my company move.

      Another friend who's a storage expert in my old home can't find anywhere to go with his career, and has no choice to go to the coasts with his level of expertise. But again - what happens in five years? In ten.

      As my current boss put it, "Not everyone is brave enough to move" for a job. It's a helluva risk. And I think the changing demographics of need, combined with the fact some people don't want to move, create areas with talent gaps.

      This is all on top of the fact that a lot of IT people are damn bitter, and understandably so.

      --
      "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
    2. Re:From an employer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have the same problem at my company in Washington, DC. I've interviewed about 100 people in the past 2 years and hired only 1. Granted we ask some tough technical question, but granted that isn't our deciding factor. It's just pathetic dealing with some of these people. They have much better resumes "on paper" than even I do, but yet they fail to meet our most basic tests, even those we've gone out on a limb to hire on a trial basis. I wonder how they keep piling up the jobs and supposed "credentials."

      For instance, I asked a woman to give me an example of some commonly used data structures in C#, Java, or C++ and she didn't even know what a data structure was. This is someone with 20+ years experience applying as a lead programmer. Another guy right out of school did not even know what Session state was. I've had people that can't even tell me the difference between a value type and reference type and they have computer science degrees and are asking for 200k+ based on their experience.

      It's really sad. I feel your pain.

    3. Re:From an employer by Surt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem is that the west coast is a very attractive trap. Great weather/outdoor sports, lots of art and culture, good restaurants, ocean access, etc. It's going to be hard for the midwest to beat that. Add to that that living in a high cost of living has advantages for the smart: max out your 401k every year with ease, drive a nice car because the prices are all pushed down by the high wage earners buying and selling, etc. Finally, there are so many jobs here that even during the worst times a talented person can find work, which is not as true for the less IT dense areas of this country.

      So ... what would you have to do to compete (and potentially recruit people away from the west coast):

      Get the attention of the person in question ... do you have a strategy for getting them to look at your job offerings? Maybe advertising in some of the (bay area, ca) local newspapers for cheap? (ad: tired of renting a tiny one bedroom apartment?)

      Make sure that your hiring story is really going to be solid with respect to what the midwest has to offer. Make sure you can tell a candidate about all the great activities locally that compete with what the west coast has to offer. I'd have pictures on hand from a recent open house showing what a fantastic house they could own in your area, for what price, and how long it would take them to earn that with your job (also documenting things like what a good neighborhood it was in, with such great schools, no commute, etc.) I'd particularly make sure your story on how your company is never going away is strong ... the prospect of getting laid off in a low employment area is scary.

      Other than that I haven't much in the way of ideas for you. I would expect it to continue to be challenging to find good IT people in the midwest.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:From an employer by MudButt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also, it seems that many people going to college for computer science/engineering aren't even learning the basics -- what colleges have you recent graduates gone to that have taught you real consulting skills, business sense and responsibility?

      I'm 28 years old and in college right now. (I dropped out during the .com boom to chase the almighty dollar, and now I have a decent resume and skillset to hold some water).

      I can honestly tell you that I built some of the best training, skills, & experience from a combination of on the job, self study, and peers. So what am I seeing at my well respected university? There are a lot of great professors... But I'm not learning anything relevant to the real world. In fact, most Sams & Wrox books would give you a better understanding than the courses I'm taking. Most of my professors went from college, to grad school, to teaching.

      My point: College isn't going to teach you "real consulting skills, business sense and responsibility?". College will (at best) lower the learning curve for the real education when you hit the workforce. If I were you, I'd encourage more on the job training.

    5. Re:From an employer by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We can't find good workers. I've interviewed repeatedly and found the new talent is terrible -- it seems that has technology becomes more "known," the amount of GOOD talent is dropping. I've interviewed some people from top colleges that just don't know their way around a business at all, and I have no desire to train them in exchange for a high 5 figure salary.

      Yep. I've been interviewing people for a Unix systems administrator position for our group where I work, and I can tell you that while the vast majority of candidates can probably poke their way around a Unix box from a users' standpoint, actually understanding the toolset from an administration and debugging standpoint seems to be a rare skillset. I can't tell you how man people I asked about various simple day-to-day Unix administration operations who couldn't tell you how they were done because they followed some "procedures" that someone else wrote up or "it's been too long", or "we used [buzzword product X, Y or Z]" or other such nonsense. For instance, many so-called "Linux experts" did not know that the command to list the kernel modules loaded into a running kernel is 'lsmod'. Most thought you could find out that information by reading /etc/modules.conf! (No, I'm not kidding.)

    6. Re:From an employer by AequitasVeritas · · Score: 1

      im not sure about anyone else, but the college i went to (Central Washington University) had two very different departments. CS was one department, and was in the college of the sciences (COTS). the department i was in, (Information Technology and Administrative Management) was in the college of education and professional studies(CEPS). it was impossible to graduate from that school with a degree in Information Technology without taking at least 4 business classes, with a couple other ones for general electives. i have a degree in Information Technology with a focus on networking, and a "certificate" (basically a minor because we couldnt have a major and a minor in the same dept, so they had these certificates) in Administrative Management because i enjoyed the business side so much. it was a great experience, and i liked the business classes a lot more than the IT classes i took. they have definately helped me in the long run.

    7. Re:From an employer by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Unless things have changed shockingly since I was in school, the best way to get an 'IT' education at a typical college or university is:

      Get a job in the campus computer labs. Preferably supporting unix/X11 terminals, printers, etc.

      Assuming, of course, that they still exist, now that every student's supposed to have their own laptop these days..

      But yeah, someone who builds a linux box for fun and enjoys spending a weekend figuring out how to get Gentoo to install on a SATA software RAID setup is the right choice, someone who read all the textbooks but isn't too curious or hackerish, not so much.

    8. Re:From an employer by goldfita · · Score: 1
      Also, it seems that many people going to college for computer science/engineering aren't even learning the basics -- what colleges have you recent graduates gone to that have taught you real consulting skills, business sense and responsibility?


      Engineering schools don't teach business and consulting skills. If you want to learn those skills, you get them on the job or you get an MBA. (And likewise, business majors aren't taught technology.)
    9. Re:From an employer by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      > I've interviewed some people from top colleges that just don't know their way around a business at all, and I have no desire to train them in exchange for a high 5 figure salary.

      Have you considered that maybe you should have lower-salaried entry positions, then, and promote as they pick up the missing skills? Speaking here as someone whose salary has doubled in the 5 years since they left university...

    10. Re:From an employer by everphilski · · Score: 1

      You got to head hunt if you want the pick of the litter without too much training. You can contract them out or you can have a recruiter on staff.

      Also, it seems that many people going to college for computer science/engineering aren't even learning the basics -- what colleges have you recent graduates gone to that have taught you real consulting skills, business sense and responsibility?

      UAH did a pretty good job. Last two semesters are spent on a large scale engineering projects. The first semester is 4 people to a team, the second semester is a 10-12 person IPT (integrated product team) project for AMRDEC, a government customer. When I went through it we were designing a guided bullet, we did the conceptual design, modeling and simulation, and actually handed them a finished product (just a mechanical prototype). We went through all the stages of development, PDR, CDR, etc. Good school, highly recommend it to anyone pursuing MAE/AE.

      (by the way I am 1 in a million ... I actually want to get back to the midwest someday... my wife and I miss it. But not today. Got to finish my masters/PhD)

    11. Re:From an employer by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      > For instance, many so-called "Linux experts" did not know that the command to list the kernel modules loaded into a running kernel is 'lsmod'.

      While that's fairly bad, particularly from the point of view of debugging problems, it occurs that I've never really dealt with modules on server systems, only on desktop. On the servers, it's handled by the Linux distro, and we then don't touch anything, whereas on my own desktop installing new hardware with freaky module requirements isn't at all odd.

      > Most thought you could find out that information by reading /etc/modules.conf! (No, I'm not kidding.)
      I dunno, if I didn't know about lsmod, /etc/modules.conf would seem a good guess...

      Purely out of curiousity, what other sort of questions are you asking?

    12. Re:From an employer by Philosinfinity · · Score: 1

      I can somewhat agree with your problems here. I went to Ohio State Univeristy and later Illinios State University. Originally, I was majoring in computer science, but soon I changed my major to philosophy. I feel as though my experience in a variety of programs give me some insight to the higher education's perspective on the subject. Universities don't care to teach you anything about Windows or Linux or OS X. They want you to know what an operating system is and what it does in the most generic terms possible. They don't care if you know about TCP/IP in depth. They care that you know what the generic anatomy of a protocol is. Technical schools like IIT and Devry (from friends' and co-workers' reports) are basically the exact opposite.

      The problem is that in the real world, IT Consulting is a matter of knowing some theory on top of some application on top of a solid foundation of problem solving skills and analytic thinking. Personally, I think that college cannot make a good computer geek. I love technology. I love experimenting with computers; breaking, fixing, reading, and learning. I used college as a means of developing my other skills and kept interest and employment in IT. Unfortunately, I think you are looking for characteristics that are not and cannot be taught, yet looking for higher education to teach them.

    13. Re:From an employer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those in the same position, what are you doing for hiring? ...The balance between efficiency and knowledge and salary is not something I worry about -- if my customers realize a gain on the money they spend on us, I have no problem paying the person right.

      As a consulting group this tactic may not be workable for you, but we've had some luck by providing people with a better work environment. We're located in Ann Arbor, MI, so we can raid UofM and the other smaller universities for new graduates and professors looking for a change, but to attract talent from the West coast we offer a them, and their families, a better life. Flexible work hours, solid benefits, profit sharing, reasonable salaries, the ability to telecommute if necessary or desired (so long as it does not interfere with getting things done), free snacks and coffee and soda and beer, an generally a nice place to raise a family. A lot of good people don't like to stay too long on the same project, but would rather move on to new challenges. Some of these people are open to moving somewhere nice and less expensive if they can have a more relaxed work environment, where you can go out to lunch and spend a few hours scribbling on napkins over beer with your co-workers.

      As I said, as a consulting firm, some of this is probably outside your control, but it is something to think about. Really smart people often know that a significant portion of their life will be spent working, and making that portion enjoyable is more valuable than money.

    14. Re:From an employer by Bob3141592 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The big problem is getting people to move. Regions change and shift and grow, and one of the terrible problems is that to get talent, you may have to get it from somewhere else. I worked with one company who, essentially, raided a neighboring state for talent. Even if the job count stays the same, the type changes.

      Moving can be economically risky. If you own a home in your present location, say you've been there for ten years, and now relocate to a new state and a new home, you're likely back at the beginning of a 30 year mortgage. It seems to me the way to primary way people accumulate personal wealth is in their home, and that means staying put until you make real progress in paying down the principal on your home loan, which means the later years.

      I've moved three times for my career, and actually lost a little money on a home sale when the Long Island economy collapsed in the mid 90's, and despite a decent income my personal wealth ain't much to brag about. I suspect that had I been more reluctant to move and found a way to stay put, I'd be far better off today.

      Granted, my one experience may not be extendable to you. What do others think anout this?

      --
      In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
    15. Re:From an employer by daveb · · Score: 1
      For those who know, most of my employees work at minimum wage with a large project bonus (up to 80%), and I have enough people looking to work for us that it isn't the pay structure that isn't helping me find good help.

      I am simply not interested in working for bonuses. But minumum wage as the base? Hell it's no surprise you get applicants as you describe. I imagine that somewhere during an interview with you I'd be thinking "take your job and shove it"

      I've done my time working on death march projects with 80hr/week. But now that I've got the experience and (some) of the expertise that you probably want, I am simply not going to apply for any job which means I don't have a life. I'll happily work my butt off for 40-50 hours a weak. If I can't see my kid, do some fishing in the weekend, and generally enjoy myself then I do not want the job.

      If you want mindless drones that you can fool into slaving (literally) for you then expect the applicants you are getting. I can offer much more, but demand much in return including a quality of life and a decent wage. and by decent wage I really don't mean that high.

      Jeese - come to think of it, I can get minimum wage + 80% bonus by working at McDonalds and making web sites in the weekend.

    16. Re:From an employer by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >For those who know, most of my employees work at minimum wage with a large project bonus (up to 80%), and I have enough people looking to work for us that it isn't the pay structure that isn't helping me find good help.

      Of course you have lots of people applying. The potential to earn 80% than you can at Wal-Mart will attracts lots of applicants. Be realistic in the level of qualifications you expect for that kind of money.

      >I'd love to find a resource for good employees

      You can get the combination of skill and salary expectation you want in various Third World countries.

    17. Re:From an employer by dada21 · · Score: 1

      You're very right about the attractive trap part, but I'm not sure if the cost of living is met with the average salary out there. I know MANY people who are in dire financial trouble in the IT field in Cali, many who moved out of the Midwest to chase salaries 3x the offerings here.

      For me, I like to grow slowly. We turn down many contracts because we can tell the company isn't right for us -- we focus on mutual profits in both directions. If they're looking for cheap or fast, we don't focus on them.

      The vacuum isn't that bad, I know of many good IT consultants, but in the Midwest you can easily strike out on your own and be successful. I'm thinking that might be why it is hard to find good help -- those who do well go off on their own.

      In the long run I couldn't care less, I've been working in the field for longer than I think I need to, and the new blood out there can be VERY good at their job. I'm finding that even while I earn a very solid living, my other streams of income mean less work (and less money), but my years in the field have left me with a solid lifestyle (not rich by any means, just stable) that should allow me to vacate the field and leave it to the next generation.

      My "complaints" I guess are more about the field overall -- the few who are really good versus the majority that are terrible. I travel the world very often, and I see many more opportunities for others to take advantage of our inability to focus on the long term coupled with a blatant disregard for responsibility to one's customer. Who knows, maybe in 10 years we won't have this discussion but the Indians and Chinese might.

      Thanks for the reply, very informative.

    18. Re:From an employer by IceFalcon · · Score: 1

      They are in the military. I hire folks leaving the military all the time. You can't ask for better, more motivated, responsible individuals. Do a search on Military Career and Alumni programs for the big four armed services. Each will have a site you can go to to advertise your positions at. Help America by helping its service members!

    19. Re:From an employer by Mr.+Jerar · · Score: 1

      On the computer science degrees, you should look in to the community colleges. Even though I taught myself, I did learn more about real world computer troubleshooting from my community college classes then I have from my computer science classes at the local university. Unless the universities change what they teach if it is even possible given the rapid change of computers, then our next generation of techs will be coming from self taught people or those attending community colleges.

    20. Re:From an employer by chad.koehler · · Score: 1

      Where in the midwest specifically? I know the greater St. Louis area is a hotbed of activity right now. However, I know all too well the concerns that you have about finding proper candidates. Most of the highly technical people that I assoicate with do not have incredible "soft-skills" and therefore aren't very suited to a client-facing position. On the other hand, I know of several charismatic individuals who have the perfect skillset for that type of position (personable, smart, good business sense, excellent common sense), but these indiiduals are lacking the technical expertise (not to say that cannot be trained). As has been said already, the "soft-skills" are the skills that are difficult to train...

    21. Re:From an employer by dada21 · · Score: 1

      I think you have the right idea when it comes to what many are thinking, but I think the idea of using a house as an investment is where many people go wrong.

      A house rarely is a good investment (even in this housing bubble we're in). I believe many people will lose 5-10 years of their retirement because of living in homes they can't afford. I truly believe that a home depreciates in value (even if it goes up in dollars the dollars are worth less), leaving you with a net loss investment upon retirement. Many people want to retire in more expensive houses, it seems!

      I have always lived cheap (and owned). I recently sold my big house to move into a smaller home so I could use that equity to work less and spend more time with family, friends and my hobbies. In the long run, I think geeks are the worst because they seem to have this innate talent to finding the worst predicaments to put themselves into (I know many geeks who constantly beg me to hire them when I know they're constantly on the verge of bankruptcy and could never focus on the job when their lives are a mess of trying to look like the succesful geek).

      Moving should NOT be a risk because of your home -- if you're wise and you saved a good portion of your wealth (I do it in gold and silver), no move should prove to be a financial burden -- if you have job interviews planned for your new town.

    22. Re:From an employer by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Where in the midwest?

      You can surely find talent on slashdot? I am going to graduate with a degree in MIS in about a year and I am from INdiana even though I live in Florida currently.

    23. Re:From an employer by Badgerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's the problem is that the situation is vasly different for different people - which is part of these various trends, I figure.

      For me no kids, no home, my wife in a job she'd outgrown, in a city with a meandring economy in the midwest. After I got laid off we basically decided to leave, and specifically targeted areas, companies, and industries appropriate to my skills and our needs. I had more interviews out of the state than in - and in my state I could at least interview for contracts. The employer I went with was one I hadn't even expected to be interested, and proved to be great.

      So for us, it came down to staying was a bigger risk than leaving. Staying probably meant career setbacks or stagnation, and eventually being unable to leave if we wanted to, being locked into a limiting geography and set of opportunities. We also had the ability to be mobile.

      But not everyone is us, and that's one thing that I find a bit chilling - I'm seeing a Mobility Gap affecting people's economic status. Both of our jobs can be done mobily, as telecommuting, etc. Both of us can move if needed, travel if needed. Not everyone else can.

      Among our friends, we see similar signs - some are staying in one area bound by a home, kids, economics, or both. Others are taking their careers mobile, looking at other states and countries.

      --
      "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
    24. Re:From an employer by ErikZ · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I've interviewed some people from top colleges that just don't know their way around a business at all, and I have no desire to train them in exchange for a high 5 figure salary.


      You don't see this as part of your problem? News Flash, every company wants the perfect employee to drop out of the sky into their laps and not have to spend a penny on training. So, your choices are:

      1. Compete with every company in existence for these type of people.
      2. Sit back and complain.
      3. Adapt, gain the ability to find diamonds in the rough, prosper.

      I'd love to find a resource for good employees, but I guess the answer is right there: good employees don't get fired.


      You are using the most advanced communication tool in the history of mankind. On a forum dedicated to computer geeks. Posting about how hard it is to find workers. With just a few keystrokes you should have qualified workers raining down on you. Do you mention what IT skills you need? Do you say what state you're located? At this point, you seem to be the choke point in the system.

      I'm not seeing how you can claim you're paying your people well. You pay minimum wage, plus a bonus of up to 80%. That's 9.25 an hour? They must work some serious overtime to get that high 5 figures.

      What colleges teach real consulting skills, business sense and responsibility? There aren't any. That's the stuff you learn when out in the business world. College is the degree that gives proof that you can be taught. After that, the businesses have to go through the applicants, hire the one with the qualities it wants, and then teach them the business.

      Is that such a horrible thing? Why do you refuse to teach people how to work in your company? Do you even have a mere internship program? If people don't know certain basic concepts, do you tell them to learn them and then come back, or do you have them blacklisted forever?
      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    25. Re:From an employer by joekampf · · Score: 1

      I can honestly tell you that I built some of the best training, skills, & experience from a combination of on the job, self study, and peers. So what am I seeing at my well respected university? There are a lot of great professors... But I'm not learning anything relevant to the real world. In fact, most Sams & Wrox books would give you a better understanding than the courses I'm taking. Most of my professors went from college, to grad school, to teaching. I totally agree that the real education you get is in the real world. However, what a CS major should be getting in college is experience in data structures, lower level systems programming, assembly, basic hardware architecture, basic electronic, lots of math, set theory, etc. If a CS major can come out of college with that, then they will have a much better chance at being the type of worker that I think the first poster had in mind. When you go to college for a CS degree you are getting a computer SCIENCE degree. Not a degree in programming Java/C#/VB/C++/C/insert any other programming language. You are getting a degree in a scientific discipline that you should be able to apply to just about any job in the IT field. You aren't getting a degree in consulting. I can really see the difference between someone who comes out of college with a CS degree and someone who comes out with some sort of pseudo-business degree, or MIS degree or even a Physics or Math major. Yes they can do a good job. Smart people are smart people. But they (non-CS or related type majors) don't have After that they can go to a company full time, learn the ropes of the business world, then go out and consultant, be put in front of potentially hostile clients and be expected to do a good job.

      --
      When a man lies he murders a part of the world.
    26. Re:From an employer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you might want to think about where you're looking for workers. I know many talented people leaving the military looking for a decent paying job. Also, the arguments saying changing regions is a big deal don't really apply to people leaving the military. You might even want to look around Air Force bases for talented people willing to leave, we are doing a thing called Force Shaping because congress thinks we have way to many people.

    27. Re:From an employer by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      While that's fairly bad, particularly from the point of view of debugging problems, it occurs that I've never really dealt with modules on server systems, only on desktop. On the servers, it's handled by the Linux distro, and we then don't touch anything, whereas on my own desktop installing new hardware with freaky module requirements isn't at all odd.

      Kernel modules don't necessarily deal with hardware. We have some that, for example, deal with security software. We have others installed on various speciality boxes like routers and latency injectors. The fact that we are a lab environment means that we frequently need to change things around, and loading and unloading modules is actually a fairly routine task, even on 'servers'.

      > Most thought you could find out that information by reading /etc/modules.conf! (No, I'm not kidding.)
      I dunno, if I didn't know about lsmod, /etc/modules.conf would seem a good guess...


      A good guess, but not at all accurate.

      Purely out of curiousity, what other sort of questions are you asking?

      Mostly laying out real scenarios that we actually encounter and seeing if the thought process is there. For instance, if you had a Solaris or Linux application that was spitting a 'Abort. Errno 2.' or some such and there was no indication on what was happening in the log files for application (or in /var/adm/messages), what would you do?

      1) You should obviously know that errno 2 is a ENOENT (file not found) on UNIX. If you don't, you should at least know that you could look in /usr/include/sys/errno.h to find that out.

      2) You should obviously know how that you could use truss/strace to find out what file or directory is "missing."

      Since in our lab we debug and test and custom internal-built and customized COTS applications for performance and scalability, and sometimes don't even have convenient access to the developers, we need a hard core administrator. Especially since we don't have time to train him or her -- we often get the application a couple of months before release.

    28. Re:From an employer by dada21 · · Score: 1

      I am simply not interested in working for bonuses. But minumum wage as the base? Hell it's no surprise you get applicants as you describe. I imagine that somewhere during an interview with you I'd be thinking "take your job and shove it"

      All my interviews occur while I am either working on a project or with one of my employees working on a project. I like to show what the job entails. Never once has anyone ever said "take your job and shove it" and never once has anyone complained about the base rate -- most would prefer a lower hourly and a higher bonus if possible, but the IRS and a variety of local and federal laws make it impossible. I also can't do permanent 1099's because of the same laws, which would open up many more tax benefits for those employed by my company.

      I've done my time working on death march projects with 80hr/week. But now that I've got the experience and (some) of the expertise that you probably want, I am simply not going to apply for any job which means I don't have a life. I'll happily work my butt off for 40-50 hours a weak. If I can't see my kid, do some fishing in the weekend, and generally enjoy myself then I do not want the job.

      My lowest paid employee is deaf and works about 12-16 hours a week (including travel). He earns almost US$50k take home after taxes, and practically selects his own hours (5am to 2pm so he can spend time with his family). He owns his home (no mortgage) and his car, and he vacations probably 6-8 weeks a year whenever he wants. His contract is a re-occuring bid contract that we always win because he works that hard -- and the customers know it.

      My top paying employee works less than 25 hours a week and earns 6 figures. He gets the job done fast and correctly, and I think I've had to fight a bill once in the 9 years he's worked for me. Maybe twice. He travels internationally with his wife whenever he wants, and I believe he owns 80% of his home, and all his cars are paid for.

      If you want mindless drones that you can fool into slaving (literally) for you then expect the applicants you are getting. I can offer much more, but demand much in return including a quality of life and a decent wage. and by decent wage I really don't mean that high.

      Decent wage is socialist claptrap -- it doesn't exist. The only dollar a person is worthy of earning is when he saves someone else $1.01 in money or time or raises their entertainment level in a degree equivalent with that $1.01. If I told you you'd get $11 at the end of the day for paying me $10 now, you'd take it. That is how we work, and that is how I pay people. They set their own bonus level and if they don't reach it, they get paid less. I can't think of one time when an employee hasn't exceeded the profitability on a project, and the customers kee rehiring us.

      Jeese - come to think of it, I can get minimum wage + 80% bonus by working at McDonalds and making web sites in the weekend.

      McDonalds doesn't pay between US$80 and US$300 per hour for a project. Considering that most projects are finished ahead of time, most people earn quite a bit more than minimum wage.

      I would never hire a schmuck who doesn't understand the basis of business -- saving people time and money for the money they pay you. In fact, I teach my employees that money IS time -- time saved to redeem in exchange for time saved. There are reasons why I receive dozens of phone calls a month looking for work, and there are more reasons why I don't hire 99% of the people I interview -- even though they love the idea of stable but upper income levels, most don't understand that responsibility is the key to income, not talent. The least talented person should earn less than the most responsible, but that isn't the case in the business world, it seems. It is also why many consultants don't last 10 years -- they don't realize why they exist, and they don't know how to sell themselves to the RIGHT customers, rather than the seemingly profitable customers.

      I

    29. Re:From an employer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to say this on slashdot, but we have a harder time finding sales people then finding IT people... There seems to be IT and developer people out there that are good, you just have to test for them and go through a shit load of interviews. We find the following formula to hold true: 1 opening = 50 resumes = 5 interviews = 1 hire.

      Now for sales people: 1 opening = 10 losers = 3 people who actually show up for an interview = 0 hires

      btw, we are in the midwest also

    30. Re:From an employer by dada21 · · Score: 1

      That's a ridiculous reply to say 80% makes sense without understanding what the original 100% entails. If I told you we could bid a contract that lasts 4 weeks, pays in 2 and 8 (1/2 and 1/2), and should entail 45 hours of work at US$200, you'd probably take it if you knew you'd get US$6ish per hour plus 40-80% of the end profit. Most people would, at least.

      The more big contracts you do, the bigger the next ones will be, if you are good to your customers and show them how much you've saved them at the end of the project.

    31. Re:From an employer by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Actually I have spoken with quite a few slashdot users over the years and have offered to bring some on in the cities they live in. Recently I've considered opening up wider in the States with my business plan, but I am getting sick of working in the field I've been in more than 1/2 my life. For me, there are other horizons to be met, and IT will likely wither away as the talent moves overseas for a lower price. I hate to see it happen, but I think the majority of IT will go that way.

      That's not to say that there won't be HUGE opportunities for those willing to find them -- every week I hear about another project that would make a pretty profit for whoever takes it, but I'm working more to downsize my own workload than upsize it. In a few years I'll give my company away to the staff and move on -- my hat and my jacket are waiting on the coatrack to be grabbed before I go.

    32. Re:From an employer by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think real estate commissions are way too high and overdue for a reduction. If we could sell our house with a 1% commission, we would be a lot more mobile. I have seen some realtors offering 1% lately- and heck- that can be $2,000 dollars these days- a good week's pay. They would only need to sell 50 houses a year.

      In relation to IT and moving- and really moving in general- I have heard too many stories about moving for a job and then getting laid off 3 to 6 months later. Suddenly in a new city with no resources and no job. Great way to be destroyed unless you have significant savings.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    33. Re:From an employer by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      Yes, but why should I come on as your employee for that? Why shouldn't I come on as a short-term contractor instead? If you aren't going to offer me a stable, decent base salary, I'm better off avoiding W2 status (as a contractor I can write off a lot of stuff on my taxes that I can't as a W2 employee).

    34. Re:From an employer by dada21 · · Score: 1

      You've hit the nail on the head there, my friend. Because of ridiculous IRS and federal laws and mandates, I can't hire permanent 1099 contract employees like I'd prefer. If they work for me too long as a contractor, I get penalized. I considered helping my employees incorporate and work as subs beneath me, but that hurt some of my ability to help them reduce their tax burden in other ways, plus it would hurt me if my customers thought I subbed all my work out.

      This way we all get the best of every world -- I guarantee stable, profitable work, they guarantee stable, profitable work, and we all do better.

      I don't think my shop is for everyone, actually it is for the very select few. I detest many of the people I interview because I know they only want in so they can extricate themselves out of the idiocy in their lives (financially), and I can't begin to imagine hiring someone who has their mind on their financial mistakes rather than the job at hand.

      But you did hit the nail on the head with your statement -- if only there was a way.

    35. Re:From an employer by grudgelord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is my belief that the current aggravated state of the IT employment market is the culmination of an out-of-control train-of-consequences beginning with the employer, ending with the employee and with HR and headhunters squarely at the epicenter of it all. I've pitched more résumés into the black hole of job boards and recruiter sites (and physical walk-ins) with little or no response. Recruiters troll the job boards with non-existent jobs in order to line the filing cabinet with a base of "skilled" employees whom they will never put to work. Of course, these recruiters are kept in business by Human Resources departments who, if they were doing the jobs they were hired to do, wouldn't be relying on recruiters.

      Interviewing, when the rare occasion to actually interact with flesh and blood does occur, sees little more success. How does a qualified candidate translate their experience into quantifiable skills that will help the company achieve its goals when those skills don't directly mesh with the impossibly specific matrix designed by unthinking HR drones with little to no grasp of the demands of the position for which they are screening in the first place?

      The employers have done themselves no small favor in restructuring the entire state of an industry either. This idea of cross-breeding suits and propeller-heads doesn't work. A business degree is not a computer science degree and a computer science degree is not a business degree. With the exception of a few programs out there designed as "Information Technology" degrees you aren't going to find a CS graduate with an understanding of concepts of TOC and ROI any more than you are going to find an MBA with more than an elementary grasp of how to check his email and download spy-ware. The employer must undertake the responsibility of training their training CS people in business concepts (some do this) and training management in CS concepts (which is rarely done adding to the geek/administration gap in corporate culture) otherwise we fall back to the ethically questionable practice of raiding talent from the enemy camp; thus shuffling the same hand of cards back and forth rather than dealing a fresh hand.

      Companies are buying into the technology venders spin and getting big eyes at the technological possibilities of the latest greatest products to come off the shelf (often in little better than an alpha state) without considering the cost of implementation and the resources required to implement said technology. Part of the cost of implementation is ensuring that the employee base is ready to implement it. Of course, the standard response is to layoff those without the implicit knowledge of the new product and hit the meat market. But the product is new and there is no talent base for it yet and in the long run it would have been cheaper to un-ass the budget to train the old IT staff as they likely have a record of adapting to technology in a fast and efficient manner (else they wouldn't be good employees). Fast forward five years: the new product is on the way out a new one has taken its place and the process begins anew along with the complaint, "There are no qualified people".

      Personally, I wouldn't touch a job that offered minimum wage, with or without bonuses. I've worked with companies that have some form of "incentive" program and I've been screwed every time. Individual incentives lead to throat cutting (regardless of the industry) and so-called team incentives merely offer employers a method of penalizing the entire team for the poor performance of one or two individuals. I've seen promises of bonuses that never materialized with the employer justifying themselves with ever piss-poor lie they could produce. While I could be wrong, this also seems to suggest that sales numbers are involved. IT professionals have enough demand with temporal performance standards as it stands. Adding financial numbers to the stress levels might serve to drive them away.

      Hopefully this will not be inter

      --
      "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0"
    36. Re:From an employer by Darlantan · · Score: 1

      Gold and silver? You're sitting pretty right now, then. I had the same plan, but since I'm still trying to save enough cash to do anything with, I got caught in a position where I wanted to buy when the market was good, but by the time I managed to save enough to do anything, the window had passed. I decided to a year and a half ago, but only managed to make enough cash to invest 4-5 months ago. Needless to say, I still have USD, not ounces of Au.

      Right now I'm sitting in a low-paying, dead-end job. I'm pretty okay with it, because it affords me time to go to college, some incentives for getting certifications I've planned on getting anyway, and it pays the bills. It's a temporary thing, but the more I look around, the more I think that perhaps I could be doing something better. I'm all for moving, since I don't currently own any property (though I'd like to, I have yet to figure out how to swing it.) It's a bit of a sucky situation. I can stick around where I am (Pac. NW) and try to get a degree that may not help me at all later on, or I can chance things and move somewhere else to a job that may suck or be very fleeting.

      TFA is good news in a way, I guess, but to me it is just a cold comfort.

      --
      Fill in your four or five-letter word of wisdom here _ _ _ _ _.
    37. Re:From an employer by dada21 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say I'm sitting pretty since I don't buy gold or silver as a profit-making investment: I buy hard money to store my wealth safely so I don't spend it unwisely, and so I am fairly protected against real inflation (which only comes from government printing more money than previously printed).

      I'm a true gold bug -- I believe that the only way to make money is to work for it. I don't believe in stock markets, 401Ks, bonds or taxes -- I believe in paying off your debt early (including your mortgage), living in a home a tad smaller than you need (1 bedroom and 1/2 bath per 2 residents is perfect), and living thrifty while you save.

      If you're trying to keep up with the Joneses -- opt out.

      If you hate your job -- start your own business.

      If you can't stand the career you're in -- try another career, starting from zero is better than driving yourself into the negatives.

      If you need some real personal advice, hit me up with an e-mail, I'll be happy to spend the time giving you some ideas for getting out of the grind and finding some happiness in life beyond just finances.

    38. Re:From an employer by bloodredsun · · Score: 1

      I think that people just aren't used to the more meritocratic idea where you are paid what you earn, not how many hours it took you. As a contractor, I'm used to the idea of believing in my ability to sell myself and then let my skills make them rehire me. You can only sell at a high rate if you can show that the return is worth it. Too many people either don't believe they are good enough or more commonly are too frightened to take the risk in case they find out they aren't.

      most don't understand that responsibility is the key to income, not talent

      Interesting point. I'm not sure I agree with it as you wrote but I understand what you are trying to say. Disciple, a good work ethic, flexible attitude, anything more than a modicum of talent and a bucket of persistence will take you to the top more often than not and get you a great income. Certainly more often than just pure talent. I guess that is what you were implying but I felt that there was more to it than responsibility.

    39. Re:From an employer by Bamafan77 · · Score: 1
      "My lowest paid employee is deaf and works about 12-16 hours a week (including travel). He earns almost US$50k take home after taxes, and practically selects his own hours (5am to 2pm so he can spend time with his family). He owns his home (no mortgage) and his car, and he vacations probably 6-8 weeks a year whenever he wants. His contract is a re-occuring bid contract that we always win because he works that hard -- and the customers know it. My top paying employee works less than 25 hours a week and earns 6 figures. He gets the job done fast and correctly, and I think I've had to fight a bill once in the 9 years he's worked for me. Maybe twice. He travels internationally with his wife whenever he wants, and I believe he owns 80% of his home, and all his cars are paid for."
      I'll be the voice of reality here for people who may be reading too much into this. Most of you reading this post are going to have to work more than 25 hours per week to earn 6 figures...at least until you get yourself established as the best out there or find a niche where you can get recurring contracts from people who can afford to pay this rate. *Then*, maybe it's possible. It's definitely *not* impossible (I know people earning similiar rates), but don't expect this off the bat.
    40. Re:From an employer by dada21 · · Score: 1

      There is DEFINITELY more to it than just responsbility, but I believe it is the key need.

      I still work for some of my original customers at around US$80 per hour. These are companies that hired me at 15 years of age with no history and no real business experience -- they took a risk, and I repay them with the reward of getting me cheaply (very limited hours, of course, as these are tiny companies). I love to finish a project, and the pay doesn't matter as long as the customer is making a profit and I'm happy with the project.

      You're also right in your reply in saying that believing in yourself (and finishing the job on time or ahead of time and on budget) gets you rehired. So many people go and get W2 jobs at a set salary, but never find ways to exceed their salary in efficiency for their employer. If you want a raise, you'll get one when you prove you're worth more -- unless you work for a monster who doesn't see value in their employees.

      I never wanted to grow to be huge, I focused rather on spinning off my best employees into their companies. As they competed with me we helped our market grow -- and I didn't have to worry about managing a huge staff. I have no desire to make millions when I am satisfied with my income (and my life), but I did desire to see my market grow so others could come into it and keep it fed. The sad part is that more and more companies are turning into monsters -- hiring the MBAs who don't know business from a textbook -- and these monsters are destroying the industries I've helped to build. It's OK, though, because all that paternalism and textbook mumbo jumbo is quickly taking jobs to countries where people understand that they can do the job for less money and headaches. Our country will learn a lesson, and they'll learn it painfully. YOu're only worth what you can save another man in time. If someone else can save that man more of his own time, guess who gets the job?

    41. Re:From an employer by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      > You should obviously know how that you could use truss/strace to find out what file or directory is "missing."

      Could I also suggest beating the responsible developer upside the head with something? I mean, seriously, I could forgive:

      open: No such file or directory

      Or similar (as in, perror output), but that's just useless. Ranting aside, it sounds like you're looking far more for a C/C++ developer with sys-admin experience, than someone who is primarily a sys-admin? I mean, it sounds more like you want them to be doing debugging and QA, than actual administration...

    42. Re:From an employer by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Most people are schmucks and would rather spend 4-8 years in college learning nothing that start out on their own, charge a low rate, and build a portfolio of successful projects.

      Not many people can make 6 figures with 25 hours of work -- this is true. Yet many people can do better than they're doing now and with less time, IF they focus on what they do best. Working for a large company won't let you find those skills, which is why I recommend finding a smaller shop, contracting for them for your basic needs, and then going out and finding contracts you can handle on your own.

      Even though I don't want any more work and I'm working my way out of my business, I still ask for referrals and good referenes from my customers. I do a good job, so I get them. Out of all the referrals I get, I pass up nearly all of them lately -- they're not worth my time.

      There are thousands of available jobs in the Midwest right now paying two-guy shops over US$120 an hour for basic maintenance work. I can't believe how few people want to take the risk, maybe it is because they know they could never follow through on time?

      I don't understand the geek mentality -- we're unique, we have a massive amount of opportunity, and we generally go and get mediocre educations only to end up in a mediocre job? Change your way of thinking and realize that the way to make money is to save someone else the money they pay you. With technology, I think there are many holes to fill. Even in my own customer base, I've interviewed MANY CEOs and upper managers who are terribly unhappy with their basic technology (I don't do the basics anymore). That hole could be filled easily and with a nice income. If you bill US$80 an hour and can find 25 hours a week of work, your gross income will be US$100K. I bet I could find 100 businesses hungry for a deal like that, but no one is available to fill the position. Sad.

      Then again, I've worked with some large IT companies, and their employees ARE morons. To think that some of these idiots get paid upper 5 figures (US$60-75K) and can barely spell is beyond me. I guess that's the reason the market sucks -- most people aren't performing because they feel comfortable with their salaried job. Then again, how many geeks here had that comfortable salaried job and don't have it anymore?

      There's the answer.

    43. Re:From an employer by daveb · · Score: 1
      My lowest paid employee is deaf and works about 12-16 hours a week (including travel). He earns almost US$50k take home after taxes, and practically selects his own hours (5am to 2pm so he can spend time with his family). He owns his home (no mortgage) and his car, and he vacations probably 6-8 weeks a year whenever he wants. His contract is a re-occuring bid contract that we always win because he works that hard -- and the customers know it.

      So how does this equate to your earlier post that your employees earn minimal wage + 80% bonus?

      Was the first comment a gross exageration or simply an ourgith lie to try and justify your rant?

      i repeat. Anyone who pays minimal wages isn't going to con me into working for them. There are enough companies around that WILL pay me a wage that I am happy for along with the non-work hours which i demand. If you do that ... then why did you claim you didn't.

    44. Re:From an employer by Darlantan · · Score: 1

      Ditto on all of those, but I've started out with little in the way of resources. I had myself, really, and not anything else. No capital at all, no property, my current assets in total come to less than $10,000. I don't like being in debt to anyone, at any time. I live frugally, but I'm still not really getting ahead. The money I was going to dump into gold was my only real monetary savings so far in life (Early 20's so far, previous jobs paid the rent + food + expenses, with precious little left over). I may still do it, because even if gold takes a dive, I can sit on it if I must.

      I've determined that my current lifestyle is sufficient, costs are acceptable -- barring rent. That's what is killing me, but I can't afford even the most basic of houses, so I beleive I'm pretty well stuck, there. I'd love to start my own company, but it's a matter of resources. I'm debating finishing up what I'm doing and trying my hand at contracting or consulting, but I need to look at that in more depth.

      --
      Fill in your four or five-letter word of wisdom here _ _ _ _ _.
    45. Re:From an employer by Bamafan77 · · Score: 1
      "I don't understand the geek mentality -- we're unique, we have a massive amount of opportunity, and we generally go and get mediocre educations only to end up in a mediocre job? Change your way of thinking and realize that the way to make money is to save someone else the money they pay you. With technology, I think there are many holes to fill."
      This mentality is typical. It's what we're taught we're "supposed" to do. Go to school, go to college, get a job working for someone, retire at 64.5. People don't think in terms of providing services to someone; they only think in terms of "working" for someone...this is a subtle but big significant difference in mentality.

      Also having a job is easier. Since you apparently run your own contracting/consulting firm, you know that you are responsible for things that are taken care of by the infrastructure of a regular company...things like finding new paying customers (this is a skill a lot of people can't pull off). Also you're more secure with a regular job (yeah, I know we all know this is a joke, but I'm representing the typical mindset).

      To be fair on the geeks, there are skills you need when running your own business. You need to know how to pick good customers - you don't want someone who expects the impossible, someone who will pay lame rates, someone who is an abusive a**hole, etc. To be fair, having a regular job is much easier than dealing with a lot of this stuff.

    46. Re:From an employer by dcollins · · Score: 1

      We can't find good workers... For those who know, most of my employees work at minimum wage with a large project bonus (up to 80%), and I have enough people looking to work for us that it isn't the pay structure that isn't helping me find good help.

      You should rethink that. A lot.

      Actually, let me help by being perfectly honest with you. When I read the end of your post, having gone on bitching about the high cost of living on the coast, and then at the end reveal "my employees work at minimum wage"... You gotta be kidding me!

      I'm working on a theory that says anyone who runs a business is required to be batshit fucking crazy. You're another data point, frankly.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    47. Re:From an employer by grudgelord · · Score: 1

      >I mean, it sounds more like you want them to be doing debugging and QA, than actual administration... ---

      I couldn't agree more. While I am quite capable of Unix/Linux administration (including use of lsmod, insmod, modprobe, etc) and though I do know some C++ and even a few other languages and scripts, I make it very clear that I'm not a developer. Yes, I know a bit of programming but I don't consider myself to have the ingrained best practices that are necessary for quality application development.

      It seems to have become a common practice of attempting to get "two for the price of one" in the IT world today. Employers want developers who will be responsible for maintaining their network infrastructure and they want administrators to perform double duty as developers. I'm not even sure that anyone truly knows what these job titles mean anymore.

      It doesn't start and end there either. I've seen helpdesk positions that demand qualifications that would put the best network administrators to shame. Since when does a helpdesk position require 5+ years of "Active Directory Deployment and Administration and 8+ years of Network Design"; all for less than $15 an hour. This smacks of an employer looking to get a System Administrator for a cut rate whilst depriving the employee of a much needed job title to boot, thus ensuring position security by preventing the employee from jumping ship with a good line on his/her résumé.

      More agonizing is this absurd practice of inventing job titles in attempt to obfuscate the range of duties that employers are going to demand of their IT personnel. Dildosoft Principal Auditing and Coordination Flabebergastrication Analyst? Companies make fun of the ridiculous titles that were prominent during the ".com" era while cooking up the most bloated and absurd titles that scream self-importance when in reality they want a system admin who can work on everything, program in four languages under three architectures, manage department costing and head up project management for nine projects while the MBAs are out playing golf and snorting cocaine off a an expensive hooker's ass. Then when the Dildosoft Principal Auditing and Coordination Flabebergastrication Analyst completes the assignments (and eight others) for which he was hired he gets "down sized" without the courtesy of a reach-around. Now the former Dildosoft Principal Auditing and Coordination Flabebergastrication Analyst finds himself faced with securing gainful employment in a market that only wants Embezzlecom Rectum Probe Enterprise Mismanagement Suite Team Leads.

      But I'm not bitter or anything.

      --
      "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0"
    48. Re:From an employer by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Hit me up with an e-mail and I'll give you some options. I started with nothing, came from a poor family, and have a pretty decent life at 31. If I didn't screw up along the way listening to people who didn't know reality, I'd be at the same place at 25 :)

    49. Re:From an employer by dada21 · · Score: 1

      He works 12-16 hours at US$6.50 or so an hour (whatever minimum wage is). That's about US$90 a week before taxes. He bills out at US$120 per hour for those 12-16 hours, so he takes home (after overhead plus my 30% cut) about $50k a year, working 40 weeks a year.

      He gets about 70% project bonus, 80% is for some, some get 50%, depends on their retention with customers. All still do better than most who get a set salary.

    50. Re:From an employer by Richard+Frost · · Score: 1

      We can't find good workers... I have no desire to train them...

      Yeah, you and everybody else. I can't believe a mediocre employee can't be turned into a good one, and that a good one can't be turned into a great one. The problem is, no one wants to risk the investment in time and money. And I know it's because IT workers are mercurial and flighty. But when everyone makes the lack of IT talent someone else's problem, you get... well, what we have today. A thousand lumps of coal for every gem, and no one willing to start polishing stones.

    51. Re:From an employer by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      I don't see talent coming out of college and moving to the Midwest (a very profitable IT sector), most are instead moving to the west coast, taking a big salaried job,...

      I've hired a good many of those people you mention having moved from the Midwest to the West Coast. More often than not, they are non-white, non-Christian and/or non-heterosexual. They are thrilled to finally live in a place that doesn't try to outlaw them. And they are highly skilled. People with options will exercise them so maybe you could make it a little friendlier for them to live in the Midwest and you'd have an easier time with the hiring.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    52. Re:From an employer by Dr_Art · · Score: 3, Interesting


      ...I've interviewed some people from top colleges that just don't know their way around a business at all...

      So you're interviewing fresh grads and not finding them to be experienced, right?

      ...and I have no desire to train them in exchange for a high 5 figure salary...

      And you want to pay them peanuts and not invest in them at all, right?

      ...most are instead moving to the west coast, taking a big salaried job...

      Wow, why would they ever do that?!?!

      ...most of my employees work at minimum wage with a large project bonus (up to 80%)

      So, we're talking up to $4.20/hr bonus on top of the $5.25/hr base pay?!?!? These guys have to be crazy to pass that up!

      ...what colleges have you recent graduates gone to that have taught you real consulting skills, business sense and responsibility?...

      My guess is that they went to the University of Unrealistic Expectations.

      Regards,
      Art

    53. Re:From an employer by tundog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've run my IT consulting business now for almost 20 years

      I find this surprising given your comments. Sarcasm aside, let me critique your post as an independent consulting professional.

      the amount of GOOD talent is dropping

      I think you forgot something at the end of this sentence. What you left off was "at the price I'm willing to pay". This is the nonsense that is fueling the outsourcing hype. The talent is out there, just not working for minimum wage.

      and I have no desire to train them in exchange for a high 5 figure salary

      The companies that "won't be there in 10 years will" are willing to pay a high 5 figure salary AND train. Training is considered a benefit that most serious professionals look for. I'll even go as far to suppose that if you're paying minimum wage, you're not paying health care either. And who cares if the company won't be around in ten years anyway. No one expects to work for the same employer their whole life anymore.

      most of my employees work at minimum wage with a large project bonus (up to 80%)

      Another reason why you can't find any serious candidates. No serious professional would even entertain this type of arrangement. It's your business and it's your risk. You're asking your potential employee to take a minimum wage job with a bonus that is probably linked to factors he/she can't control. If you hire me, I do an awesome job, but the customer stiffs you, I can be pretty sure that I won't be cashing that extra check. And BTW, even with an 80% bonus, you're still paying less than $10 an hour (based on federal minimum wage of $5.15). You can make more cleaning toilets. No wonder you're relegated to hiring tools.

      I have enough people looking to work for us that it isn't the pay structure that isn't helping me find good help.

      I deal with a lot of recruiters. Only about 5% are even worth speaking to. Given your pay structure, you must be dealing with the 95% that waste my time.

      what colleges have you recent graduates gone to that have taught you real consulting skills, business sense and responsibility?

      These things aren't taught in college.

      --
      All your base are belong to us!
    54. Re:From an employer by bladesjester · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only to live in the midwest but to work there. A lot of the places here are run by (or have hiring departments filled with) people that want all of their employees to be white, straight, clean-cut christians.

      Granted, I don't stand out in any of those manners *that* much (I'm Taoist but that doesn't really stand out. The facts that I am not a small guy and the long, neatly kept hair are a little hard to hide and my eyes make me look part Asian - I'm 1/4 Native American), but even I run into that mentality.

      If it weren't for the insane cost of living, I'd have absolutely no problem with working in California. I've occasionally pondered Oregon and Washington, but haven't had any bites there.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    55. Re:From an employer by drspliff · · Score: 1

      In terms of what the detatchment of job titles from their actual roles, in the past few years I've noticed it getting much much worse. Taking what one of the parents posted, that recruiters are only after their commission and really don't know or care what the job requirements are as long as you mention enough of the buzzwords.

      I worked for a year in an 'assistant' position on minimum wage, with all but one of my bosses being completely incompetant, while being expected to do everything from oracle dba/admin, network maintainance, web development etc.

      Now that I'm back doing the recruiting hurdles again, not trying to find 'oh please any job.. anything' like most of the other unemployed in the IT sector, I'm trying to find somewhere that I'd fit in.

      Having gone through several interviews for positions such as 'Senior IT Security Development Engineer' (i'm not kidding), which turned out to be a fairly standard Unix software QA and QA support role. Another good example was a company asking for a '.NET Developer', while I'm perfectly happy developing in C# - they failed to mention that they only wanted VB.NET developers, I could've lied and said that I knew VB.NET (there is no API difference between it and C#) I'm not sure that I'd want to end up working in that sort of environment that just smells of incompetance.

    56. Re:From an employer by shaitand · · Score: 1

      You are breaking one of the basic laws of economics. A house is a liability, not an asset. The same is true of cars and electronics. You could get lucky and purchase a house in a neighborhood where property values skyrocket but most people lose money on their home, not make it.

      Investing in a house is like saving in a checking account. The bank gets the interest, not you. In addition to the interest you are losing, you have to pay for the upkeep on the house and live with the depreciation (which is merely slower on a house than most things, wiring gets outdated and so forth) or pay substantially to fix it back up again. Don't forget taxes on that sucker. Last but not least, you have made an excellent point regarding the way a house ties you down.

    57. Re:From an employer by bloodredsun · · Score: 1

      So many people go and get W2 jobs at a set salary, but never find ways to exceed their salary in efficiency for their employer

      No idea what a W2 is as I work in the UK but I assume that it is a standard salaried job. I think the main reason why this happens is because companies either can't or don't recognise outstanding performance. So there is no incentive for an employee to complete a task in half the time when the only payoff would be a (maybe) 5% raise or bonus - "twice the effort for a a tiny benefit to me, no thanks". This is a management flaw plain and simple, although it is compounded by behaviour at school where longer essays equals better, more time spent on a project equals better, when it should be better equals better!

      It's an unusual company that doesn't turn into a monster when it reaches a certain size. The requirement for more management almost always leads to greater inertia and less flexibility. I say almost as there are a few out there that don't. I don't think that necessarily MBA's are the root of all evil either. I've known some bad and some very good MBA's and I think that trouble stems from the hiring process where the mere ownership of an MBA is seen as validation of competence. Just as no one got fired for buying IBM, no one gets fired for hiring an MBA!

      The only large AND agile company I've seen close up is Flight Centre but their reward, responsibility and management systems are second to none for a multi-billion dollar company. Too many others allow too much deadwood. If you're interested in what they do, I would do some searches on their CEO Graham "Skroo" Turner.

    58. Re:From an employer by Sol_Web_Dude · · Score: 1
      Which Midwest are you talking about?

      In my area, (Central Indiana) the available tech jobs have been in decline for some time. I have a broad 17 year experience with a non-outsource type systems administration skill set. In the early to mid nineties I had my choice of jobs. Since 2000 the pickings have been very slim for someone like me. The newspaper ads have gone from nearly a whole page to 3 to 6 on Sunday. Monster just wants "Secret e-Bay Shoppers" and 4 to 6 new listings a week of lower paying entry level helpdesk positions or very specific programming skills. The only calls I get from job sites are recruiters that don't read my resume carefully and ask if I can do this or that (which isn't even close to what I list).

      Add that to the fact that local employers realize this and they mistreat you because they know you cannot go anywhere else very easily. I took a job last year that now has made a wrong turn (long story) so I'm looking again. It's worse than what I saw in 2004.

      Nothing positive to report here in the Midwest I live in.
    59. Re:From an employer by zettabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know I'm too late to the game, but:

      For those who know, most of my employees work at minimum wage with a large project bonus (up to 80%), and I have enough people looking to work for us that it isn't the pay structure that isn't helping me find good help.

      So, your paying people $5.15 * 1.8 = $9.27/hr TOPS? I don't know about the rest of the crowd here, but that seems awfully low for an IT worker. Or are you being loose with the term 'minimum wage'?

    60. Re:From an employer by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Coming from a rust-belt city where most of the people have left for the coasts, I'll paraphrase the most common response to why the left - "Sure, I can have a huge house with a yard in Midwestern City X - but in Big Coastal City Y I can have a life."

    61. Re:From an employer by I_am_spacewalk · · Score: 1

      dada21, your comments in this thread reek of spam. Are you by chance actually in the business of selling gold and/or silver?

      --
      "no law" should be construed by the courts to mean "no law whatsoever, without exceptions, and this means you, moron."
    62. Re:From an employer by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      You pay minimum wage, plus a bonus of up to 80%. That's 9.25 an hour?

      Huh? Minimum wage plus 80% of the profits, not 80% of minimum wage.

    63. Re:From an employer by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      I'm just now catching up on this discussion, and it looks like an enormous number of people who hear you say "minimum wage plus 80% project bonus" think you mean "minimum wage plus 80% of minimum wage bonus." Even when you say it's a project bonus. I think you should spell out for them that you mean they get a minimum wage plus 80% of whatever the payment for the project is.

    64. Re:From an employer by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I see now why some people were flabbergasted. Yes, it's up to 80% of the project's net profits. Since almost all our billing hours are labor, the profits are very high. It is usually project gross income minus expenses (travel, food, etc) minus contract lawyer minus contract bonding minus collection overhead. Take that amount and I take between 20% and 50% of the rest based on who sold the project. It is still a lot of money, I've seen people going home with US$20,000 per month before taxes in some of the more profitable projects! Of course, we have months where you earn US$2,000, too, but it is usually much higher than the average salaried worker.

    65. Re:From an employer by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I see now why some people were flabbergasted.

      Well, that and some people just want to be jerks, or just want to assume that you are a jerk. Anyway, I saw it as a common thread in several responses, and I wasn't sure you saw it. Thought it might help refine your comments for next time; spell it out, they WANT to miss what you have to say...

    66. Re:From an employer by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      He doesn't say that, and in his reply, he didn't refute it.

      Offhand I'd say you're wrong.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    67. Re:From an employer by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Been reading dada21's stuff since January now. Every single post. He's discussed this before ... trust me, he means a bonus consisting of 80% of the profits. And I even pointed out to him that most people seemed to be misunderstanding, which he hadn't realized until then. So yeah, go on telling yourself he pays 1.8 x minimum wage if you want. If you think that, then why you should care so strongly is beyond me ... economics would definitely take care of him, if that were the case.

    68. Re:From an employer by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Why am I taking this personally?

      Because I came from the Midwest. I graduated college and I had plenty of life experience plus I had been computer literate since my first CocoII. I ended up having to clean out ink jet printers to get by because I couldn't claim years of experience in X or bang out answers to technical quizzes.

      And here sits this guy, whining about how hard it is to find good people, after we've just gotten out of a period that gave all the advantages to the employer.

      Zero. Sympathy.

      I ended up moving out of the Midwest because I figured if I was going to be barely getting by in a miserable job, I might as well do it somewhere where the scenery is nice.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    69. Re:From an employer by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Okay, sorry to hear about that, but it still seems counterproductive to hold to the idea that the man meant 1.80% of minimum wage when he's stated that he meant minimum wage + 80% of profit.

    70. Re:From an employer by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      It's not unreasonable that someone who created, owns, and manages a mature high tech company be able to communicate effectively.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    71. Re:From an employer by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      You're right. There oughtta be a law!

  15. Serves you right. by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Some businesses may in fact regret some of the job cuts they made in recent years, which, in retrospect, may have been too deep. Recent surveys suggest that employers are having an increasingly difficult time finding information technology workers."

    So can I be expecting a late night, drunken I'm-so-sorry-I-broke-up-with-you-will-you-please-t ake-me-back phone call from my ex-manager?

    -Grey

    1. Re:Serves you right. by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Funny

      So can I be expecting a late night, drunken I'm-so-sorry-I-broke-up-with-you-will-you-please-t ake-me-back phone call from my ex-manager?

      Quite possibly. I suggest the traditional response is the best approach to this situation: Pertend to take him back, and then sleep with his best friend as revenge.

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    2. Re:Serves you right. by eison · · Score: 1

      I've had that call. It's about as weird as it sounds.

      --
      is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
  16. It's true! by saboola · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know this because I watch television. In it, they say they IT jobs are in high demand, and all I need is this certificate in order to get a yacht like the guy on the tv. So, this is true.

    1. Re:It's true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ObSNL:

      Rafael: You have to learn computers!

  17. awesome! by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 1

    now when will someone hire me?

  18. Who would have thought? by spxero · · Score: 1

    If we upgrade technology... we MIGHT need people who know how to utilize that technology. So hire for the install and setup... fire... then rehire for maintinence!

  19. Make you smile... by MudButt · · Score: 5, Informative

    FTFA, "Some businesses may in fact regret some of the job cuts they made in recent years, which, in retrospect, may have been too deep. Recent surveys suggest that employers are having an increasingly difficult time finding information technology (IT) workers."

    I was laid off in the fall of 2004 because it was determined that the company could outsource our System Admins and Database Admins to a domestic contractor and co-locate to save a couple bucks in the long run. (You can convince any executive to do anything, BTW, if you have a good PowerPoint ROI chart, laser pointer, and $800 suit).

    Long story short, the fine print in the contract stated that only 2 major systems would be outsourced (which amounted to about 40% of the total workload), and after everyone was laid off, the contractor says, "Now... You know that we're not going to handle email, NAS, web services, and other misc systems, correct?"

    Needless to say, they're now locked into a 5 year multi-million dollar contract, AND have hired back new system admins to replace the layoffs. I'm not bitter... But it still makes me smile anyway... =)

    1. Re:Make you smile... by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Needless to say, they're now locked into a 5 year multi-million dollar contract, AND have hired back new system admins to replace the layoffs. I'm not bitter... But it still makes me smile anyway... =)

      I knew the moral of the story after reading the line I was laid off in the fall of 2004 because it was determined that the company could outsource our System Admins and Database Admins to a domestic contractor and co-locate to save a couple bucks in the long run.

      I've heard this story over and over again, and I'm sure it won't be the last time either.

      So, to all those CIOs, MBAs, and suits out there, listen up.

      Running customized and complex computer systems and networks takes expertise and man hours. At this time, it is not something that can be easily outsourced. I've never known computer systems to go down in size or complexity, but rather the inverse seems to always be the case. Sure, when your systems are running perfectly, and there are no issues, that is because your admins are doing a good job.

      Entropy happens, bugs get fixed in software, only to introduce new bugs. Security is a moving target, and requires updates or some other kind of fix to get around new problems. The day you can just buy a system, hire some installers, and lock the server room. My job will be obsolete. But I know of nowhere where you can up and buy such a thing beyond something like a simple POS system, or some other closed/embedded system that has a single purpose. And if you did, its not going to be cheap, and odds are it will not work as advertised either.

    2. Re:Make you smile... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Needless to say, they're now locked into a 5 year multi-million dollar contract, AND have hired back new system admins to replace the layoffs

      And yet, I'll bet the fools that cost the shareholders all that money still somehow have their jobs.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  20. Friends by Xeriar · · Score: 1

    As my own consulting / repair business (finally) picks up, I'm planning on going with people I can trust. Granted, that's only a very few people, and it won't get me far... But a lot of the people that 'aren't getting fired' that you want are probably rather unhappy with their current jobs.

    So I guess the answer is where it started. Network, network, network. I don't do enough of that really, myself.

  21. Improved human rights - executions down 40%. by khasim · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Tech workers are back in hot demand, according to a report released Monday.

    Tech-sector job cuts in the first quarter of 2006 were 40 percent lower than the same quarter last year, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas Inc., an employment consulting firm.
    Gotta agree with you.

    Seeing a reduction in the number of people fired in no way translates to "tech workers" being in "hot demand".

    1. Re:Improved human rights - executions down 40%. by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I realize thinking is not a pre-requisit to posting. However, realize that job cuts are a fact of life. Period. Even in the best of markets, some company is cutting jobs.

      And even in the worst markets, some company somewhere is hiring.

      Basically, this means that the hole in the bottom of the bucket is smaller. And, if you follow other news, you will realize that hiring has picked up.

      So, yes, a decrease in job cuts is good news. Your market may vary.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Improved human rights - executions down 40%. by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2, Informative

      No where did it say hiring increased .

      Just less lay offs .

      Under those conditions and terms a natonwide job freese could be
      in effect at most places, and still some lay offs occuring .

      What the trend is typically is to hire more L1, H1-B's ,
      and offshore or near shore .

      Some countries have setup cruise ships off the coast ,
      and this is called near shoring .

      Bizarre indeed .

      http://www.adtmag.com/article.aspx?id=10959&page=

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    3. Re:Improved human rights - executions down 40%. by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Ya know...it has been a few decades since I read Orwell's 1984, but the verbiage looks mighty similar.....

    4. Re:Improved human rights - executions down 40%. by MsTek · · Score: 1

      MUST be a republican. Or libertarian. Or... will shoot your mother for food.

    5. Re:Improved human rights - executions down 40%. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40% may not seem like much. But as Companies hire and fire all the time, and people also quit their job. So this would amount to more companies hiring than firing. Therefore less people with those skills in the market for those companies to hire. Therfore people with these skills are in higher demand.

      It's economics.

  22. What about the hiring rate? by VoxCombo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess my follow-up question is this:

    What's the current trend in hiring?

    That's great if cuts have slowed, but I'd like to know if that means the net number of jobs is increasing

  23. From an employer-From a peon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We can't find good workers. I've interviewed repeatedly and found the new talent is terrible -- it seems that has technology becomes more "known," the amount of GOOD talent is dropping. I've interviewed some people from top colleges that just don't know their way around a business at all, and I have no desire to train them in exchange for a high 5 figure salary."

    That can't be. According to the last slashdot story all the "kruft" has already left for nursing.

    "I don't see talent coming out of college and moving to the Midwest (a very profitable IT sector), most are instead moving to the west coast, taking a big salaried job, and finding themselves stuck in a very expensive area where the high salary doesn't seem to overcome the overhead of living there (stress, costs, traffic)."

    Proably because the Midwest is as exciting as watching paint dry.

    "Also, it seems that many people going to college for computer science/engineering aren't even learning the basics -- what colleges have you recent graduates gone to that have taught you real consulting skills, business sense and responsibility?"

    I'm still waiting for the education I already paid for to generate good results.

  24. Numbers Show Demand Is Dropping, not Rising! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Jobs are still being cut, although not as severely as last year. So the number of IT jobs is declining and the situation is getting worse for job-seekers, not better.

    Contrary to the OP's headline (and to the original article's headline, surprisingly), the article's text show that there is no "Higher Demand" for workers - indeed there is lower demand. And the projection is that the demand for IT workers will decline even further. There is no projection as to when the decline will level out (cease).

    1. Re:Numbers Show Demand Is Dropping, not Rising! by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

      As I posted elsewhere, these two concepts are not mutually exclusive. Things can get worse for job seekers, while demand is actually increasing (real demand, not just nominal demand)

      If demand drops 50% (which is about what the tech bubble burst probably meant), there is a lag to when actual employement reflects the new demand. This is based on contracts, and just overhead of letting people quit, vs laying them off. During this entire time, there is a surplus of employement, and there will be layoffs. During this period, which could last several years, if demand subsequently goes up to 60% of the original demand - an actual increase in demand - there is still a surplus, and the lay offs will continue.

  25. It is our responsibility.. by Tominva1045 · · Score: 1


    It is the responsibility of the tech worker to keep his skill set up. Technology itself is not going to disappear tomorrow. There will always be opportunities to provide this service if one has a current skill set.

    As an American company, we work with Indian companies all the time. Although they can often compete on cost they do have issues:
    a) They are thousands of miles away.
    b) Most of them are asleep when we are awake (turn around time).
    c) Requirements can get lost in translation- even English to English.

    We like the quality of work product we receive, but there will always be more work to do.

    Further, do not believe the media hype OR anti-hype about the economy. The job of the media is to keep YOU tuned in. Happy news is fine but most people tune in for the fear factor. That's why 90 percent of the news is negative. So do not buy into it. Just keep your skill set up and be open to the idea of new job opportunities.

    The question is: do you want to go for the gusto or spend your time creating the TPS reports?

    - a little cult movie lingo there

    --
    Cogito Ergo Sum
    1. Re:It is our responsibility.. by sbrown123 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      a) They are thousands of miles away.

      Wait till the new guest worker program goes in to effect. Yeah, you probably thought it was all about Mexicans picking potatoes out in some farm out west, right? Wrongo. With the new guest worker program, H1B visas are no longer required. Employers can just ship in boatloads of Indians and Chinese to do your job for about 1/4 of the cost. I don't care how skilled you think you are, theres someone who will jump off that boat and say they can do the same job for much less.

      President Bush will try to make you think this is all about people working jobs that Americans won't do. He's right. We, as natural born Americans, find it hard to work at wages way below the poverty line.

      What can you do to stop this? Write to your two senators and tell them to put a halt to the "guest worker" program. Sure, we have jobs to do and can't go marching around the streets today like the immigrants, but we need to find the time to stop this before it gets out of hand.

    2. Re:It is our responsibility.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We, as natural born Americans, find it hard to work at wages way below the poverty line"
        Jeez.. what part of C-A-P-I-T-A-L-I-S-M do you not understand? Just because you are a natural born American, you think you have the right to work at artificially inflated wages? Give me a break..
        If there's somebody who is ready to work at a lower wage than people like you, who think astronomical salaries are their birth-right, what is wrong in giving that guy the job?. And don't give all this BS about all level playing fields and all that. If you think an H1B snatched your job, because that poor guy works for a lower wage, well you can re-snatch that job back by offering to work at a lower wage. I know.. I know, that means you can't afford that luxury car any more.. You can't afford that multimillion mortgage anymore.. Well tough luck dude.. welcome to freemarket economy. Start living within your means and stop getting pissed of at H1Bs and other immigrants. You can rant and rave all you want about this. You can lobby as much you want and have protectionist laws passed. But being a techie, you might understand the laws of nature. If you don't let me explain something in layman's language. "Heat always flaws from a higher temperature region to lower temperature region to achieve equilibrium". Similarly, as long as there's work here in US, people will come down here. It doesn't matter if you build a great wall along the mexican and Canadian boarder and ban all immigration. People will still come here as long as there's work legally or illegally. You can try banning them.. you can make fun of them.. you can say that they are unfairly competing by working at lower wages. But they will come as long as they have a family to feed and as long as there's work here in US. That is the reality whether you like it or not my dear friend!

    3. Re:It is our responsibility.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious - can you cite a real reference for that statement about limitless work visas for I.T. workers? The senate version of the bill isn't up on Thomas yet, so I'm curious about how you got your information.

    4. Re:It is our responsibility.. by sbrown123 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well you can re-snatch that job back by offering to work at a lower wage.

      Ignorance must be bliss. You ever hear of a company called Tata? It's probably the largest Indian outsourcing firm. Seen them contracting at a medical company once. They brought in 20 guys on H1Bs. Guys. Not women or families. Their wives and children stay in India. Anyways, they bunked up at six people per apartment. They were paid $500 a month each.

      Okay, I have a wife and two kids. Say I offer to do the same job these guys are doing, but like you said demand lower wages so I work for $400 a month. Apartments where I live run minimum of $750 per month. What were you saying: no more million dollar mortgage or luxury car? Your right, at $400 a month it's impossible to have a car or a house and still eat!

      But being a techie, you might understand the laws of nature.

      Nature and Techies? Your not from around here are you?

      You can lobby as much you want and have protectionist laws passed.

      Protectionist laws? Did you know there have been laws about ILLEGAL immigrants for years? Who would have thought that ILLEGAL immigrants would do something ILLEGAL. Why don't these people go back and LEGALLY apply for citizenship like thousand of LEGAL immigrants do every year? There is a process and a LEGAL way for citizenship that they are refusing to abide to. What next? Pedophiles and murderers go on marches because they feel that their crimes shouldn't be crimes or punishable? Yeah, I don't know what country you are from but here in the U.S. we try to abide by the laws of the land.

      Similarly, as long as there's work here in US, people will come down here.

      Thats easy to correct: you jail Americans for hiring ILLEGAL immigrants. Watch those jobs disappear in a hurry.

  26. Looking for VB.Net developers! by RingDev · · Score: 1

    We've been sitting on two open positions for going on 2 months now looking for qualified developers. Hell one seat is entry level! The other is mid level.

    Outsourcing FUD be damned, we have the positions and I could really use some help here!

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Looking for VB.Net developers! by Kris_B_04 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And where ARE you? :)

      Kris

      --
      Remember when Windows were washed, mice were trapped and UNIX guarded the harem?
    2. Re:Looking for VB.Net developers! by MudButt · · Score: 1

      We've been sitting on two open positions for going on 2 months now looking for qualified developers.

      Out of curiousity, what do you consider to be qualified? I know a lot of C programmers and Java programmers that would happily take a .NET job if it meant you could give them a little time to learn the syntax.

      Read between the lines on a resume. Don't reject someone with 10 years of C programming. A good .NET developer =! certified .NET developer.

    3. Re:Looking for VB.Net developers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      links to job postings plz, k thnks

    4. Re:Looking for VB.Net developers! by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Whoops, I forgot location isn't on /. profiles. Company is a successful business machines sales/leasing company with branches across the northern mid-west. The corporate office (where these positions are) is in Madison, WI.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    5. Re:Looking for VB.Net developers! by RingDev · · Score: 1
      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    6. Re:Looking for VB.Net developers! by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I don't have much say in the process, but I have been trying to bring people in who I think would be good fits. I had an old college buddy lined up for the job when his employer offered him a new position and project that he had been itching for.

      The entry-level position the project coordinator is looking for a college grad with OO experience, preferably in .Net but with the UW so close by, I see a lot of Java junkies. That one is not being advertised heavily so far as I know though. So if you (or someone you know) is local to Madison, WI and looking for a good first job, let me know.

      The mid-level position he is looking for someone with OO experience, but also some VB6 experience. We have legacy apps that still need to be maintained/converted, so having knowledge from both OO and non-OO (VB6) languages is very important.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    7. Re:Looking for VB.Net developers! by Erik+Noren · · Score: 1

      This will sound weird, but I've been looking for jobs in Wisconsin near UW. I've been considering going back to school (again) but needed a job in the area to rationalize it!

      I've been working on legacy government apps written in VB6 COM+ with ASP and VBScript and helping them migrate to .NET (my language of choice being VB.NET but not averse to C# at all.)

      I graduated with my BS Computer Engineering in 2002 and a year later started my graduate course while working full time here in Virginia. I graduated with my MS Computer Information Systems degree on December 31, 2005.

      I've been looking at Madison because of UW - specifically because they are one of a few universities with a School of Scandinavian Studies in which I am considering enrolling. They offer Scandinavian and other language courses which I want to continue to learn as well as the Foreign Affairs field I've been looking at.

      I have a few reservations about moving to Wisconsin though. First, what sort of job opportunities are there? What happens if I find a job that I don't like; are there other options? Do any jobs require a security clearance? (If I take a job that doesn't, I will lose my clearance and I'd rather not.) Would these jobs even provide me with the ability to attend courses? Would I be able to afford to live and attend school on the salary?

      These are questions I'm sure a lot of people from the coasts ask themselves (well, maybe not the school questions but the job choice, fallback options and salary) when considering a move to the midwest (or back as I was born in Michigan and educated through undergrad in Ohio.) Looking for positions in that area, the type of work I do seems very sparse or at a level far below my abilities and experience. I can't imagine an employer would want to hire someone for a job much below their level without feeling fear that the person may leave as soon as they find something more fitting with their experience.

      I could be wrong but I do feel these concerns myself and I have to think I'm not the only one.

    8. Re:Looking for VB.Net developers! by RingDev · · Score: 1

      "I've been working on legacy government apps written in VB6 COM+ with ASP and VBScript and helping them migrate to .NET (my language of choice being VB.NET but not averse to C# at all.)"

      Most of my work is in VB.Net and some ASP.Net, with a little VB6/VBA work in maintenance and conversion.

      "I graduated with my BS Computer Engineering in 2002 and a year later started my graduate course while working full time here in Virginia. I graduated with my MS Computer Information Systems degree on December 31, 2005."

      Grats on the degree! I used to live out in VA. Just north of Quantico (I'm a former jar head)

      "First, what sort of job opportunities are there?"

      In the last 6 months I've had 4 cold call job offers (as in I wasn't looking, old coworkers and head hunting groups we looking for help). All of which were decent, but would leave me with a longer commute. I live about 30 minutes south of the city, so taking a job 45 minutes north of the city would be a bitch of a commute.

      "Do any jobs require a security clearance? (If I take a job that doesn't, I will lose my clearance and I'd rather not.)"

      Not much. Maybe some of the stuff at the UW, or a handful of positions with the state. My clearance has long since lapsed and it hasn't altered my employ-ability in the least. But it is nice to have if you are working in the DC area.

      "Would these jobs even provide me with the ability to attend courses? Would I be able to afford to live and attend school on the salary?"

      I didn't get my degree from the UW, so I can't say for sure what their schedules are like. But I am just wrapping up a bachelors of technology management from a local private college where I have taken my classes at night and online. The cost at that school is about the same as the Wisconsin Resident rate for the UW. The office here though does operate on the standard day shift (I pull 8-5 with an hour lunch), so day classes might not be possible, I could ask though. As for salary, I would imagine you could handle school and life costs on the money here. I bought a house (had help with the down payment), supported my wife and son, and went to school on an entry level pay rate. It was a bit tight, but survivable. Back in my single days (before house or college) the entry level rate around here was enough for a nice apartment, excessive electronics gear and lots of bar time.

      "Looking for positions in that area, the type of work I do seems very sparse or at a level far below my abilities and experience. I can't imagine an employer would want to hire someone for a job much below their level without feeling fear that the person may leave as soon as they find something more fitting with their experience."

      That's one of the things my manager is concerned about. The average time on deck for this company is crazy. My manager has 30+ years here, most of the supervisors are 10+ years, and there are tons of other employees with 5+ years on staff. That's why he isn't keen on relocators (he thinks if they are willing to jump to come here they will be willing to jump again as soon as another offer presents itself.) But if you are still interested, here's the monster link: http://jobsearch.monster.com/getjob.asp?JobID=3993 1208&AVSDM=2006-03-09+14%3A41%3A58&Logo=1&q=gordon +flesch+co&cy=us

      Just toss a note on your cover letter that you talked to 'Rick Way' from the IS department.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    9. Re:Looking for VB.Net developers! by Kris_B_04 · · Score: 1

      :)

      Kansas has openings too... Guess it's the coasts that are over-ridden with people to fill positions... maybe people should move inward! :)

      Thanks!
      Kris

      --
      Remember when Windows were washed, mice were trapped and UNIX guarded the harem?
    10. Re:Looking for VB.Net developers! by Kris_B_04 · · Score: 1

      Damn.. Too bad I live so far away!!

      --
      Remember when Windows were washed, mice were trapped and UNIX guarded the harem?
    11. Re:Looking for VB.Net developers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh!

      Isn't it cute when two people get together!

  27. ...but for less money by LoaTao · · Score: 2, Interesting

    CS majors average starting salary dropped 2% according to CNNMoney

    --
    The smartest man in the whole, wide world really don't know that much. - Mose Allison
  28. Re:From a recent college student by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    lol. you've never even seen a college CS curriculum, have you? i'm doubting if you even went to a US college if you expect people to come out of them with usable job skills in IT, much less those particular skillsets. here's all the business sense i have (and which you seem to forget) compressed into five words:

    "fast, good, cheap: pick 2".

    if you want employees that are "good" and "cheap" from a technical perspective, you're going to have to train them on soft skills, which doesn't happen overnight. sorry. logic's a bitch...

  29. What's an average? by Tominva1045 · · Score: 1


    Is an average where they take the large count of really slow to move large company salaries and lump them in with the small count of little companies now kicking their ass in the marketplace and divide by the totals?

    Some of the up and comming little guys are doing well whilst the larger, slow moving guys are revamping mission statements :-)

    woo-hoo! Is America great or what?!

    --
    Cogito Ergo Sum
  30. do 5 minutes of research... by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Try Huntsville, AL (mostly defense but we got some biotech and other firms). Try Silicon Valley. Theres plenty of tech places hiring if you take the initiative and look.

    Too many tech workers have been saying "poor me" since the dot-com bubble burst. Too many tech workers aren't willing to move away from their town of 20k in search of a better life. I know kids fresh out of college pulling down close to 60k working IT and related fields. They were willing to do a little research and they got one hell of a reward.

    1. Re:do 5 minutes of research... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Too many tech workers aren't willing to move away from their town of 20k in search of a better life.


      Yeah because God forbid we think about moving expenses!

      1. I actually like where I live. Sorry you don't or didn't.

      2. Not only have I been told I'll change jobs several times in my ever-lengthening career, these companies think I should pay for each and every relocation on top of the cost of plane tickets and accomodations for the interview IF they'll even consider a currently out-of-towner. Excuse me, but are you fucking high?

      So let me get this straight:

      I like where I live now, I've got college loan debt, and the job market is shaky if not outright turbulent, but I should be jumping to fork out thousands of dollars to travel to, and live in, super expensive California for the mere possibility of a "better life?"

      Whatever you are smoking, you need to share with the rest of the class.
    2. Re:do 5 minutes of research... by everphilski · · Score: 1

      1. I actually like where I live. Sorry you don't or didn't.

      I like where I live. I like where I lived before that. And before that. And before that. And I'm 23. The world is a big place...

      2. Not only have I been told I'll change jobs several times in my ever-lengthening career, these companies think I should pay for each and every relocation on top of the cost of plane tickets and accomodations for the interview IF they'll even consider a currently out-of-towner. Excuse me, but are you fucking high?

      Good credentials? The first interview will take place over the phone, or maybe online... the second interview they will fly you out, and if they want you bad enough they will relocate you. Now if you half assed your way through college or, god forbid, didn't graduate, yea, you will probably have to foot the bill. But then again you aren't top of the line, premium candidate. Sorry.

      Godamn man, get your head out of the sand. Get your resume out there and let them wine-dine-69 you. This is the 21st century.

      Whatever you are smoking, you need to share with the rest of the class.

      I'm not smoking, that's why I'm making a good salary and was willing to move (and be moved) for a better life.

  31. I wish... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    Living near Pittsburgh, PA I can honestly say that tech. is non-existant. The jobs are far and few between, pay terribly, and the number of tech folks looking to grab any job at all (even at large pay cuts) is staggering.

    Outsourcing smaller tech depts to consultants and firms set up to do just that is all the rage, which just cripples the market even more. I know this isn't the hub of technology, but when you graduate #2 from Penn State with a 4.0, have 8 years of experience, glowing references, and still have an impossible time finding employment something is wrong.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:I wish... by netsavior · · Score: 1

      I know this isn't the hub of technology...[blah blah blah]... and still have an impossible time finding employment something is wrong.


      If you were an ice fisherman would you live in Arizona or Alaska? If you were an oil field worker would you live in Texas or New York City?

    2. Re:I wish... by MudButt · · Score: 1

      I know this isn't the hub of technology, but when you graduate #2 from Penn State with a 4.0, have 8 years of experience, glowing references, and still have an impossible time finding employment something is wrong.

      It's a big country... You might want to consider seeing it. Someone with your background shouldn't have a difficult time finding work in the midwest. Search http://dice.com/!

    3. Re:I wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.laurelnetworks.com We're hiring.

    4. Re:I wish... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, and fully agreed... just not everyone's life is so cut and dry that it is possible to pull up stakes and move. If you aren't familiar PA ran a huge campaign called "stay, invent PA" and a lot of people received grants and money to pay for school but in exchange for staying and working in PA once graduated... there are a lot of people in that boat. Not me personally, I have my own reasons that I cannot leave, but there are many that fit the above category and are in bad situations.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    5. Re:I wish... by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      hehehehe! I live *in* Pittsburgh, PA, and there aren't many jobs here. This is why I moved to Boston for the dotcom funtime -- Pittsburghers were very slow to gain interest in the Internet.

      That isn't at all to say there aren't some great high-tech companies out here, as there are a few. They're just not hiring. There's a list of almost all of the Pittsburgh recruiting agencies on (shameless plug) recruiter-rater.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  32. How about posting a job ad here for us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    to look at?

    That way, we can what you're having a problem finding.

    I don't beleive you that you're having a problem finding the talent that you need and I don't beleive you that people coming out of school don't measure up. I think your "standards" are unreasonable.

    Do you demand that your programmers have an engineering degree to write business apps? Or a MSCS?

    Do you look at the resumes directly or do have a clueless HR person "screening" the resumes?

    Are you offering a competitive wage? Or in your case, is your bonus system fair? (I've seen bonus systems that dry up when it's time to get paid - even though the boss says I deserved it.)

    I think if you look at your hiring proactices a little more carefully, you'll see that there's something wrong on your end. There's so much talent out there that's having problems because of unreasonable requirements. If you want a developer with the needed business kowledge, you're going to have to steal him and pay him BIG bucks to move out to the Midwest. I for one, will not work in a one shop town. Been there, done that, and got fucked.

    1. Re:How about posting a job ad here for us... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      I went through the motions of considering a minimum-wage programming job w/sizable bonus.

      It gave me the late-night infomercial get-rich-quick creeps. Unless you have a very well-established friendship with these people, you're going to scare a lot of people away.

      I would never work for more than a few weeks without guaranteed payoff unless I owned the company. Or knew the deal for a few years and didn't see anybody get screwed by it.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    2. Re:How about posting a job ad here for us... by dada21 · · Score: 1

      You're right, but most of our contracts are 2-16 weeks, with payment at the quarter and at the project end. Considering all my financial books are open to anyone who works for me, AND that many of my employees can be contacted directly by would-be interviewees, it isn't a risk if you can see the reward: more money for less time worked IF you're responsible and good at working.

      Most people are lacking in both subjects.

      I've also never had an employee quit on me in the 18.5 years I've been in business -- never one.

    3. Re:How about posting a job ad here for us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've also never had an employee quit on me in the 18.5 years I've been in business -- never one.

      Were else would they go? Work as a farm hand? That's if they can get hired. Farmers only hire Mexicans so that they don't have to pay the taxes, SS, and workers comp. Anyone who quites would have to MOVE to get another job - moving sucks and it's expensive!

    4. Re:How about posting a job ad here for us... by dada21 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've helped past employees grow beyond being employed by me by helping them finance their own companies. Some still directly compete with me (in an open market), and some subcontract work we can't reach. I don't consider it quitting when I help someone move to their own business, in fact I almost demand that those who work for me look for opportunities to open up their own shops.

    5. Re:How about posting a job ad here for us... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      It's interesting, you are giving your employees more of the risk and more of the potential payout. It'd be nice if more employers did this.

      The typical model is to have the employer take all the risk/payoff while the employee gets stability. A lot of people need a stable income, but some people are more flexible.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    6. Re:How about posting a job ad here for us... by dada21 · · Score: 1

      There is no risk with an unstable income IF you know how to reduce the risks that almost 99% of American workers take -- not having money for the future. Rather than settling their future costs early, they accept debt to live in the now and forget about tomorrow.

      I would never hire someone who isn't willing to accept a few higher costs early on in order to live a more effective life. All my employees are aware that I hammer into them the basic knowledge I've learned:

      1. Buy your first small house and pay it off quickly. 7-10 years TOPS, preferably quicker.

      2. Buy your first car used and drive it till it dies.

      3. Invest in safe investments (gold, silver, safe high-dividend-paying international stocks) only after you are completely debt free.

      4. Focus on building real value in all your work. Build a portfolio of every project you work on, for the day that you might want to start your own company or go work for another.

      Most people can be 100% debt free (including mortgages) by the age of 25. The problem is that most people want to live like they're multi-millionaires, there is no room for granite countertops and 2 bedrooms per home-occupant in my world. My employees learn this also, and I have no room for those who live irresponsible lives only to pass on their retirement costs to the next generation.

      If you're solid by 25 or 30, debt-free, you can take huge risks that also entail huge rewards. Calculated risks are not the gambles that uncalculated risks are, and there is a lot of history that has to be analyzed in the calculated risk. I've turned away customer after customer because I knew they'd be unprofitable in the long run -- the whiners, the cheapskates, the MBAs with no real knowledge of how business should be run. If you do your job, and you select the right customer to contract to, the risk is very small that you won't make a profit. If you prove to them that you've saved them more money than you cost them, they'll hire you again and again and again. My company is still retained by people who took a chance on me when I started the business in my late teens, and they continue to rehire us when the contracts expire.

      Why? Because I understand what business is -- saving someone more money than they're paying you.

  33. This says nothing about hiring by goldfita · · Score: 1

    So they're giving less people the axe. Is there any hiring going on?

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=182579&cid=150 91616 - my last post on this

  34. It certainly isn't, is it? by khasim · · Score: 0, Redundant
    I realize thinking is not a pre-requisit to posting.
    Well, it certainly appears that way, doesn't it?
    However, realize that job cuts are a fact of life. Period. Even in the best of markets, some company is cutting jobs.
    Yes they are.

    But in the best of times, the demand for those workers exceeds the supply so those job cuts translate to changes of employer.
    And even in the worst markets, some company somewhere is hiring.
    Yes, it might not be for your job. It might not be something you're qualified to do. But somewhere, someone is hiring. Burger flipping and prostitution seem popular.
    Basically, this means that the hole in the bottom of the bucket is smaller.
    That's what I said.

    The hole has gotten smaller, but there is still a hole. That is not "hot demand".
    And, if you follow other news, you will realize that hiring has picked up.
    That's great. Of course, TFA kind of contradicts that.

    If hiring is picking up, why are companies still laying off the employees?
    So, yes, a decrease in job cuts is good news.
    If by "good news" you mean ...

    "We have good news! The cancer will only take both your legs right now and kill you in about 20 years."

    As opposed to:
    "I have good news! I won the lottery!"

    I guess it all comes down to what you want to define as "good news".

    Which is why I chose to illustrate the point with my "executions" example. Everything is positive ... if you start from a sufficiently negative point of view.

    But that's just a semantic game. What really matters is the human cost. And that shows that, even though things aren't as bad as they were before, they are still bad and people are still losing their jobs.
    1. Re:It certainly isn't, is it? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      That's what I said.

      The hole has gotten smaller, but there is still a hole. That is not "hot demand".
      There is always a certain amount of churn. It's the relative sizes - the net effect - of the two flows that matter. Shouldn't be a difficult concept for someone with a four figure ID to grasp.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  35. Customers care about results... by Tominva1045 · · Score: 1


    Customers care about results. If they guy of the boat can't speak english, can't interpret requirements, and doesn't know the clients business it won't matter that he works for $2 per hour.

    --
    Cogito Ergo Sum
    1. Re:Customers care about results... by sapped · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Customers care about results. If they guy of the boat can't speak english, can't interpret requirements, and doesn't know the clients business it won't matter that he works for $2 per hour.

      Really? Why don't come and peddle that crap to my current employer? They obviously didn't hear about your theory before embarking on their current slapdash offshoring initiative.

      We are talking here about sending our entire IT dept to a company which doesn't even have PC's for their employees. My numbskull employer agreed to buy them all laptops (at approx 1.7 times average market price).

      Currently we are doing knowledge transfer via conference calls. The lines and the accents are so difficult for both sides to understand that we may as well be talking in different languages for the amount of knowledge that is being transferred.

      Each time I mention the problems that are going to come our way as a result of this ridiculous approach I am told that I cannot see the "big picture" from my lowly "techie perspective" and these guys are really cheap. I wonder why.

    2. Re:Customers care about results... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Each time I mention the problems that are going to come our way as a result of this ridiculous approach I am told that I cannot see the "big picture" from my lowly "techie perspective" and these guys are really cheap. I wonder why. - you are told the right thing, you really cannot see from your lowly techie perspective that by hiring this extra cheap shop and by firing some of the US based workforce, the company will be able to show lower spendings in the next quater and probably will present it as higher earnings, bringing your 'Initech' stock up by a quarter of a point. So that your 'Lumbergh' can buy yet another Porsche.

      Cheers

    3. Re:Customers care about results... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Gee, there's a s**tload of corporations - from small to mega-multinational that haven't got your message yet. And the Parent post is correctly reading the loophole Bush put into his Guestworker bill - which was shot down, thank goodness...

  36. slashdot-"/." Beat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So just what am I supposed to do in front of this computer all day then?"

    Wank to Sir Mix-A-Lot's tune "Baby Got Back".

  37. Re:From a recent college student by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have agree. Most colleges teach computer science and/or computer engineering. These are NOT Information Technology worker degrees.

    Many areas are now offering degrees in Information Technology and/or Software Engineering. Maybe these are the types of grads you should be recruiting?

  38. This was an actual increase in demand... by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

    Jobs are being cut because there is excess supply. Actual employment does not respond immediately to changes in demand, if demand fell by 50% overnight, the surplus would last for several years, and there would be cuts lasting for several years.

    If after demand dropped 50%, it later increased back to 60% of the original value (so indeed, demand did increase) there is still a surplus, and jobs would continue to be cut, but at a reduced rate. Jobs will not stop being cut until either

    1) actual employement falls to the level of actual demand
    2) actual demand increases to the level of employment
    3) some combination of the 1 and 2

    But the fact that there is still a gap does not mean that demand isn't increasing.

    This is not the same as "cuts" in medicare etc, which are just cuts in the rate of growth, but an actual increase in demand. Its just that the employement level is sticky.

  39. natural selection by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

    ... job cuts in the tech sector are down 40 percent

    Wouldn't this start to happen as the number of available jobs to cut decreases because of all the cutting?

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  40. Ask Slashdot - by Ponga · · Score: 1

    This is something that has been of great concern to me and I would appreciate any and all follow up comments on the matter.
    I work now as a Sys Admin, and have been working as a Sys Admin since '98. Until about 3 or 4 years ago... I enjoyed a stable job at a decent wage... but now I am working for scraps, for chump change... and I have concluded that I must get my degree because no one respects my nearly 10 years of experience and flawless work ethic as much as a degree. So, I am in the process of going to school and have a couple years to go to obtain my BS in CS.
    My dilemma is, I am paying my own way here and the cost out of my pocket to complete the program will be around $40k, all told. Will it be worth it? I mean, will I really be making an acceptable wage when I finally grad? Current trends are mildly alarming. What do you guys think?

    1. Re:Ask Slashdot - by srite · · Score: 1

      well i think its good for experienced people like you. I am not really sure how it will change. I have a MSCS, very little experience and jobless btw.

    2. Re:Ask Slashdot - by chonet4444 · · Score: 1

      at the risk of insulting the hard working sys admins out there, i'd say that you need to focus on "high touch" tech jobs. straight operations-type work will be outsourced but high touch or high-impact-to-business-capability jobs are in demand.

      so get your degree, if you can make the change from admin to architect you'll find much more job security because the very nature of the work prevents it from being easily outsourced. even projects that do get outsourced to overseas need an architect to define and design the solution to fit the goals and capabilities of the enterprise.

      it's true that you'll probably become an expert in presenting ideas via visio and powerpoint (or in Impress) rather than typing away in a terminal and coding, but that seems to be the nature of the job market.

      it's all about being able to communicate what can and can not be done that is of high value to an enterprise these days. so you'll have to know all the technology involved and how to interpret business requirements (as well as communicate and negotiate with the business folks defining the requirements) but you won't personally be implementing or maintaining the technologies to support the capability in the solution that you design.

    3. Re:Ask Slashdot - by ErikZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh hell no.

      I would leverage your CS skills with a non-CS degree. That way, you've got a biology degree and you rock with computers. That way, you've your computer history, and you're available for any jobs that require a biology degree, and you have a college degree.

      By doing pure CS you're limiting your prospects.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    4. Re:Ask Slashdot - by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I second this.

      CS degrees are VERY hard (the only class in my school where people had to stay up 40 hours straight to get the homework done on time) and don't relate to the work you will actually be doing. Why kill yourself for a CS degree when you can get a Business degree- faster- and as a result for a lot less money- and have better job prospects.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    5. Re:Ask Slashdot - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How come your not just going to a state school? Did you believe those BS ads about how Strayer is better? I have a technical masters from a state school and the classes were very good.

  41. Tech workers are in high demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I graduated in Decemeber with a BSCS, and I started looking for a job in mid-March. I live in San Francisco, so I can work anywhere in the Bay Area or Silicon valley. All I did was post my resume on craigslist and monster, and, during a two week period, I received 25 calls and several emails from employers. Some employers even offered to pay me to come in and interview. The job market right now is crazy.

    If you are in Silicon Valley, and you know your stuff, $70K should be the lowest salary you should accept as a new college graduate.

    1. Re:Tech workers are in high demand by Snatch422 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. I live in SF as well and graduated last May came out here with no plans posted my resume and got a couple interviews and a job in less than a month. I am doing C/C++ programming by preference. If you are in Silicon Valley, and you know your stuff, $70K should be the lowest salary you should accept as a new college graduate. I would definetly agree with that. Some other posters talking about .NET being a gravy train may also be correct. I prefer the power and control with C/C++. The job market out here is definetly booming though.

  42. Wages Are Still Down, We Need MORE H1-Bs!!!! by Vicissidude · · Score: 2, Informative

    Everything is positive ... if you start from a sufficiently negative point of view.

    Exactly. Last year companies like IBM and HP were laying off tens of thousands of employees at a time.

    Last Friday, the big news was that college graduates were getting offered more money, except CS grads who were offered 0.8% less than last year's CS grads. If wages are going down, then the demand for labor is going down. For all of you without business degrees, that means there are MORE CS grads than there are jobs.

    All this media hype over "highly demanded" IT workers is a bunch of bunk. It's all about making the excuse for more cheap H1-B labor.

    1. Re:Wages Are Still Down, We Need MORE H1-Bs!!!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well, again, it all depends on what study you are looking at.

      According to other studies, CS major enrollments are WAY down...so, not that many new tech people coming into the market...the big, easy $$'s of yesteryear aren't there anymore. And, a lot of the people that flocked to IT that weren't really good, got caught in the bubble crash..and are gone.

      So, that leaves a lot of good, older IT people out there...with less competition from new grads...so, with the pool drying up a bit, it looks like IT may have a slight comeback.

      At least..if it keeps that trend...and the IT person can call the shots more, it IS an ideal time to incorporate yourself, and hit the consulting/contract circuit...good money to be made, and lots of jobs out there.

      My Dad always told me to 'make hay while the sun is shining'....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Wages Are Still Down, We Need MORE H1-Bs!!!! by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 0

      Computer science is not the only part of the IT field, and a shrinking one at that.

      Programming languages have become much easier to write and debug in. Add to this that a lot of programming work really can and is being farmed out to other countries.

      Administration and maintenance are something you *can't* outsource, and that's where the real job growth is. All the new complicated programs being created run on large disk arrays, which require large networks and lots of servers accessing the data to be stable. This means there is a good job market out there for system, network, storage and database admins and engineers.

      Just because much of the grunt coding work isn't being done here doesn't mean the job market sucks. Unless you're a really good programmer to begin with, you're not going to find a high paying programming job fresh out of college anymore.

    3. Re:Wages Are Still Down, We Need MORE H1-Bs!!!! by Glonoinha · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Programming languages have become much easier to write lame-ass code and then pretend to debug in.
      There, fixed it for you.

      Given that about 90% of all new code where I work is getting written in SQL (stored procedures) or Java, both languages which are over a decade old (plus or minus) - no, it isn't getting any easier to write corporate grade code. What is happening is that lame coder wanna-bes can slap together code using whatever they can learn in their six week jump-start (for the love of whatever Hindu God you guys pray to - please add switch / case statements to that six week course) and send us back broken code that takes forever to fix and costs 4x as much to maintain over the life of the app. You can write ugly code in any language, even the new 'easy to use' languagess (I know because I have seen it.)

      The problem is that people THINK it is getting easier to code, so they accept all of the above as normal. There is going to be hell to pay once all this code hits critical mass, and those that can survive between now and then may come out pretty good. For now, not so fun.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    4. Re:Wages Are Still Down, We Need MORE H1-Bs!!!! by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      No, I totally agree with you. What I meant is the low end code is so easy to write these days, if you want to find a job you'd better have your shit together and know what you're doing. The easy stuff that doesn't matter is farmed out to wherever.

    5. Re:Wages Are Still Down, We Need MORE H1-Bs!!!! by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      With CS enrollments down, we should be seeing an increase in wages for CS graduates. However, we're not - wages are going down. That means even though the supply of CS grads have gone down, the demand for CS grads have decreased even further.

      All these media reports saying we need more CS grads are pure bunk. So, that leaves us with a question: why are they putting out these reports? The short answer is that this is what companies are telling them. The long answer is that companies are telling the media this so that these same companies can then go to Congress and push for more cheap H1-B labor to drive wages down even further.

    6. Re:Wages Are Still Down, We Need MORE H1-Bs!!!! by sgt_doom · · Score: 2, Informative
      Exactly so, Mr. V-dude! Unfortunately, I noted that Senator Boxer (in the neoliberal camp) is pushing for an increase in H-1B quotas, along with every single Republican in Congress, of course!

      [Well, as Bush has violated the National Security Act, Treason Act, RICO Act and the War Crimes Act - I would say super-traitor is more the proper term.]

    7. Re:Wages Are Still Down, We Need MORE H1-Bs!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now... the perspective from the other side of the ocean...

      I do not see many companies in the US advertising jobs for H1-Bs. Actually, I see a lot of adds where they explicitily say that they will not sponsor H1-Bs. Humm.... from here, it doesn't look like companies are really so desperate to get more cheap H1-B labor as you say....

    8. Re:Wages Are Still Down, We Need MORE H1-Bs!!!! by Vicissidude · · Score: 2, Informative

      Humm.... from here, it doesn't look like companies are really so desperate to get more cheap H1-B labor as you say....

      Riiiight.... that's why all the H1-B visas for the year are gone within hours of release. That's why all the corporations are screaming to Congress to increase the number of H1-B visas. That's why Bill Gates recently said Microsoft's number one goal is to increase the number of H1-B visas.

      Can you detect my sarcasm from there?

    9. Re:Wages Are Still Down, We Need MORE H1-Bs!!!! by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

      I got a call from a company called Blue Jungle, who had seen on dice.com that I wished to relocate to the Bay Area. Then they asked me what my Visa status was, I told them I was a citizen. They said they'd send an email with information on it and we'd set up an interview the next week.

      It sounded great, I really had my hopes up. Then I never got the email. I called, and she sounded confused... said she'd send it and set up a phone interview with the engineers. No email for a few more days. I called back and the lady I had talked to twice before wasn't in that day, the guy who answered said he'd leave a message for her.

      So after a while I finally catch on that the Visa question was important. Both the people there I talked to were non-native English speakers as well.

      --
      simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
  43. I have no problem finding good talent by xtal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, I pay for it, too.

    I'm an oldschool technie who realized he'd better figure out this business stuff, fast. We do custom embedded linux work, board-level up, MCUs, etc etc. We're booked. Solid. Yet I get stuff done with low overhead.

    What did I do?

    I walk the walk. I know good people are easily 100x more productive than average. I know some good people from all my days in the trenches (hi guys). When I want things done, I package it up, and send it off with a big cheque. I don't care where, when, or how.. we work online. I live in the middle of nowhere, handy an airport. That's all that's required to do business.

    If one of the guys I work with is doing 10x the work - I'll actually give him 10x the pay!

    It doesn't work for all business, but it is working, and I am growing clients and profit.

    Something to think about if you "can't get people to relocate" - my advice - make teleconf and virtual offices work for you. Hire the best people available no matter where they are. Reap the rewards.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:I have no problem finding good talent by dada21 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree with you 100%. Since I pay my employees up to 80% of the profit on a project (but minimum wage otherwise), they bust their butts to be more efficient, and reap the benefits. I know a few of them who've earned probably US$500 per hour working hard to finish well before the deadline and leave almost zero punch list activities.

      That being said, most geeks don't want to take a risk that they might only make US$12k per year (none of my guys do) in exchange for buying their efficiency and responsibility. I am glad I have so much competition, though, because it only helps my business when the bottom and middle level of IT is met by GOOD consultants. I'll happily accept the upper levels while passing on the projects that don't meet my criteria.

      I recently sold my big home and vacation condo to move into a small home (trailer, actually), which freed up huge amounts of money, mortgage income-necessity, and time. I've been thinking of moving to a small town with an airport and buying into a private plane co-op so I can travel as I need to. As I find more work is possible remotely (although I prefer working face-to-face with my clients), this might free up even more time and money for me to spend as I want to.

      The idea of working a solid 40 hours a week for 50 weeks a year would drive me bonkers, no matter what lifestyle I can pretend I'm living. Glad to hear there are others out there who came to the same realization.

  44. I won't be happy... by EatHam · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... until I can get paid $500k per year for writing HTML.

    1. Re:I won't be happy... by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      I won't be happy until I can get paid $500k per year for writing HTML.

      Hay, use my me as your referal for adsense.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  45. The gravy train ... by pvera · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... is definitely .net.

    I got advance notice in late January that I would be laid off 3/31. Went into panic mode, started looking and all I could find was .net, which was a problem since I had switched the company from classic asp to PHP over the past 3 years or so.

    For every call I got about php I got 20 for asp.net. I even learned that one of the biggest recruiting companies in the Washington DC Metro now recruits for .net exclusively.

    After two months, my number came up and I got laid off effectively 3/31. I got two offers on 3/31, one to work like an animal in a php/Oracle shop for a huge company, one to work like an animal in a tiny shop that only does .net and is tired of turning down php work because all of the programmers are overbooked. I was able to jump in and do both kinds of work, so I took the job at the tiny shop.

    Apart from the near saturation of .net jobs here in DC Metro, there is a lot of Java, but I am very worried about the morons that are doing the recruiting. I actually had a recruiter hand me a job description that had three bold bullets with mandatory Java skills, and he was still trying to con me into applying for the job.

    Another problem I saw with the very limited supply of php jobs is that the people that are hiring are absolutely disconnected from the salary curves for this market. They want you to have 10 years of experience in C, C++, PHP, Ansi SQL, JSP, HTML, CSS, XML, etc. then they want to hire you for $50K or less. And they get offended when you laugh in their faces. I noticed this is only a problem with the open source type jobs, the .net people were advertising pretty much right on the median for the salary surveys for the area.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
    1. Re:The gravy train ... by rebelx2 · · Score: 1

      They want you to have 10 years of experience... Not to the technologies listed above.... But I always get a kick when a recruiter/HR person wants you to have 10+ years experience in a technology that's only been around for 2-3 years. I went to an interview in 1999 for a SAN admin job and they wanted 10 years experience in production SAN administration. Ummmm... hmmm Good luck with that!

    2. Re:The gravy train ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. is definitely .net.

      That's too bad, but not completely surprising. The people who actually RUN IT, and decide what 'technologies' will be used, are a bunch of freaking morons.

  46. Let me tell you why it won't be. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Every so often, when the tech sector's job market starts to look good for you, the potential laborer, tech businesses start releasing statistics. These statistics say "OMGZ! There's a labor shortage! We need more programmers and IT people! We simply can't get enough of them!".

    This isn't exactly the truth. Demand for tech people has increased, but not that drastically. However, by screaming "labor shortage" everytime the demand for tech jobs grows, businesses convince a whole lot of people to go into the field. Then, in 4 or 5 years, there's a huge supply of tech laborers. This drives down the cost of labor (read: YOUR SALARY) for tech businesses. People realize the jobs aren't really there, drop out of the market, and then the businesses start screaming "labor shortage" again.

    So the moral of the story is: Study what you like. Don't just pick the latest hot job.

  47. Rate your recruiter! by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    Of course this is a shameless plug, but you can rate your recruiter and identify job board spam at http://recruiter-rater.zhrodague.net./

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Rate your recruiter! by pvera · · Score: 1

      Damn good idea, I would have gladly hosted that site for free.

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
  48. Pittsburgh sucks (Was:I wish...) by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 1

    I know this isn't the hub of technology, but when you [have a lot going for you], and still have an impossible time finding employment something is wrong.

    ARRRGH! Would you move already?!

    I used to live near the Burgh, and while the city has a lot to recommend, a robust job market (of any kind) is not one of them. And it hasn't been that way for over twenty years!

    Sure, the cost of living is dirt cheap, but the jobs just aren't happening. The place is rapidly turning into Alabama North. (Especially outside the city. Each year it looks more and more like wherever Larry the Cable Guy grew up).

    And everyone I know who lives there still just bitches about how things are falling apart. Now, they don't do anything about this, mind you..

    Get over it. Ain't no money to be found there. Just ask Mario Lemieux.

    And I'm sure if you looked outside the box known as Western Pee-Ay, you'd find quite a few places that would like to have you around. They may be in more expensive areas of the country (Bay Area, NoVa, Raleigh/Durham), or not (most of Texas), but I think having an income might just offset the homesickness, no?

    To reiterate: Move.

    --
    --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
    1. Re:Pittsburgh sucks (Was:I wish...) by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Totally. I moved, and it was probably the best thing for me -- rent went waaaay up, but so did the pay. I had a blast. Of course, that city seriously dried-up in '02, so here I am back in El-Cheapo, Pittsburgh.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    2. Re:Pittsburgh sucks (Was:I wish...) by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      I had replied above since all of the responses to my post are: MOVE!!!Eleventy11

      The thing is I am not in a position to move, I have a number of ties that I cannot break to move where better opportunities abound. The other main issue I rose was the PA "stay, invent PA" campaign. Not me, but a number of my classmates took advantage of this program which helped pay for some of their college in return for staying for a set number of years and working in PA. They are now hurting because of this and do not have the option to move at all unless they want to be strapped with some nicely sized bills coming their way instantly. We have discussed this a couple times, and honestly I can't decide if the program was a scam to nail college grads for all the funding plus interest to line some politicians pocket or if it was a genuine effort to retain talent.

      Beyond the outside factors not allowing me to pull up and move, I truly would like to make a difference and use my skills and talents here in Pittsburgh. I know that sounds pie-in-the-sky, but it is the truth. If everyone turns tail and runs, it will be a ghost town and continue to decline. I wasn't trying to come off as a woe-is-me story and whining about my situation, just stating the facts and how there is some serious issues to be faced in other areas of the country like the 'Burgh. I'd like to see the Pen's stay, I'd like to see this city revitalized, I'd like to remain here and raise my family here, who knows in the end I may have to move but for now I am making an effort to stay. It's my situation and decision and I don't *blame* anyone in this, just wanted to show how bad it could be in other cities.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    3. Re:Pittsburgh sucks (Was:I wish...) by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 1

      Oh wow. Didn't know about the 'stay invent PA' scam. Mea culpa. Have you considered the other (prosperous) side of the state?

      To be honest, I'd love to see the city rebound too. It's still home in a way, even though I've been gone for.. oh.. 18 years or so.

      (You might be a Pittsburgher if:

      1. You remember Chilly Billy.
      2. You remember SCTV, and native son Joe Flaherty -- especially "Count Floyd". Verry scarrry boys and girls.
      3. You don't flinch when the "t" isn't pronounced in Saturday.
      4. Your favorite dining area is called the Strip, and you don't think it's weird if a restaurant there starts serving breakfast at 11pm.
      5. Sister Sledge actually means something to you (hint: 1979).
      6. Donnie Iris is one of your top ten classic rock artists.
      7. Nothing seems wrong with naming a town "Blawnox".
      8. Nothing seems wrong about pronouncing the name of that one suburb "ver-SAILS", even though it was named after that large palace outside Paris (you know, the one where the treaty ending World War One was signed..)
      9. You know, in your heart, that no matter how bad things get, Cleveland will always suck more.)

      But I think waiting for the city to turn around is a fool's errand. I'm sorry to say it. Really am.

      Take care, good luck, and more power to you.

      --
      --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
    4. Re:Pittsburgh sucks (Was:I wish...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least there are jobs in cleveland.

    5. Re:Pittsburgh sucks (Was:I wish...) by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Heh, I laughed at a number of those. And honestly that is part of what makes Pittsburgh unique. Stay invent PA, while not affecting me, is really a shame and many close friends are really hurting as a result.

      Rendell is the one of the reasons the right-side of the state is "prosperous" all of our funding and money is next-dayed there while we get what fluttered down from the overstuffed suitcases. This city has had a love affair with some of the worst democratic politicians in history and even after years of being run into the ground no one here quite "gets it." They'd pull the Democrat lever even if it was blank in Pittsburgh, there are a number of very frustrating factors in living here... and honestly I may turn tail as soon as I am able to, but for now I'm stuck struggling even with two college graduates (my fiance is a teacher) top honors, and a healthy dose of skill.

      To give you a laugh: I make about $36k as a netowrk admin for a decent sized bank where my job duties include: Web design, Cisco, 6am-11pm on call, Networking, firewalls, security, programming, help desk, break/fix, database design, backup, application support, phones, and much much more daily. Basically I am the IT dept. All for $36k/yr. and the sad thing it was the best of my choices a year ago when I graduated.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    6. Re:Pittsburgh sucks (Was:I wish...) by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd fault the GOP too when it was in power in Harrisburg. Dick Thornburgh didn't do squat for western PA. The sad fact is that nobody in H'burg will ever help the western end of the state. They can take it for granted, or ignore it entirely once it depopulates. Remember: Alabama North. (My sister-in-law used to work for the state version of C-SPAN, and got to see a ton of shit firsthand. She hates most state legislators today, especially Republicans. Generally, most of these specimens use the General Assembly as an excuse to eat. It was no surprise then when her crew would occasionally turn their cameras on sleeping assemblymen drooling on their notes. That didn't last long.. hee hee..)

      --
      --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
    7. Re:Pittsburgh sucks (Was:I wish...) by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Yes, and believe me I'm not so shortsighted to believe that just by ousting the Democratic regime that Pittsburgh would magically turn around. It wouldn't.

      Massive changes need to happen, and I honestly thought that they were finally "getting it" when they began building the new PNC building in an otherwise run-down area of downtown, or with projects like the Southside or the Waterfront... but they have not. For a city with nothing but mile upon mile of waterways and riverfront and hundreds of bridges you have the best blank canvas to create a masterpiece from.

      Instead of slot machines, get riverboat gambling. Incorporate the water and bridges into the actual fiber of the city, miles of riverfront shopping, Venice-like water traffic, and most importantly TECHNOLOGY. Pittsburgh has some of the lowest cost of living in the country, so wages can be lower. Instead of outsourcing overseas, outsource to Pittsburgh. People can live happily on $20-30k a year and it is a perfect compromise. If ever a city was ready to be "used" for cheap and plentiful labor this is it.

      Now, if only it would happen... or just begin to happen.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  49. My personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently had to find a job in the bay area. I have a Computer Engineering degree and about 3 years of experience. Within two weeks of starting my search I had solid leads at seven different companies. In the end, three made me offers. Within one month of starting my search I started work at my new company. And, now that I'm here we've got two open positions that we've been trying to fill for months.

    The tech sector job market is definitely getting tight, at least in the Bay Area. Econ 101 tells me that this should cause salaries to go up, but I'm not holding my breath.

  50. you've revealed your problem by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    you see a mysterious agenda manipulating reality via unseen forces

    i've often found that people who believe in conspiracy theories have a number of cognitive handicaps, handicaps that might also mean you're not a very good it guy

    dude, there is no illuminati

    try to cope with reality without explaining the unknowns at work in your world to be an all-encompassing "them" out to get you

    or, you can ignore my words

    because clearly, i am part of the sinister dark hand keeping you down

    (snicker)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you've revealed your problem by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Well .. at last we are getting somewhere.

      So... "They", what is your agenda? That way I can clue my friends in on it. ;)

      ---

      Actually the agenda has been very clear and not mysterious at all lately. It might be random Slashdot and ZDNet duping but we are suddenly swamped with articles saying how rare programmers are, how we need more H1B's and how we need more programmers when I see people with experience and degrees who can't find work or who are making $20k less than they should be making. Meanwhile, my company continues to outsource like a fiend.

      The flood of articles (some from people with a strongly vested interest like IBM) makes me suspicious since reality is different than what these stories are reporting.

      I used to be very trusting- but the more bogus studies I see outed, the less trusting I become.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    2. Re:you've revealed your problem by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      The ant is unaware of the larger patterns that the human can observe - unfortunately, too few humans can observe the ever more complex patterns. You remind me of the dullard corporate attorney I once ran into that didn't know the SEC used to publish a Directory of Interlocking Directorships (during the period we met).

      Strangely, they no longer publish it...I wonder why? But for another interlocking directors site.

  51. Re:From an employee by Telastyn · · Score: 1

    That's odd. Having just moved to part of the midwest [for aforementioned cheaper cost of living] and done some job hunting, it seems like hiring managers wouldn't know good talent if it slapped them across the face. No phone screens. The most elementary of technical and business interviews. Even the secretaries out in Silicon Valley had to go through a more rigorous evaluation than what I've seen in the midwest.

  52. Straight to grad school? Maybe not by kevinl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Individual circumstances vary, but going straight to grad school often isn't cheaper in the long run. You're giving up 2 years of earnings (plus raises) and you have to pay for school yourself.

    If you're only going as far as a Master's, consider working and having your employer pay for grad school. It's not easy, and it will take longer to finish your degree. But the real-life work experience will give you a new perspective towards your studies that full-time students will miss out on.

    Don't procrastinate starting grad school after starting work though. Most people who "take a semester off" never get started. And voice of experience here, try especially hard to finish your degree before having kids.

    The parent was dead on about quitting work and paying for grad school with retirement savings. This almost never pays off in the long run.

  53. My biggest gripe is... by Windcatcher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...the emphasis on "skill sets" and not on whether you can think and learn.

    "Does your skill set include J2EE? No, just Java?"

    Click. Phone goes dead, you never hear from that recruiter again.

    "Does your skill set include XYZ?"

    I'm so sick of this nonsense. The problem, as I see it, is several-fold:

    - Recruiters who want the immediate "sell" to get their finder's fee: they only want that person with experience in the exact buzzword they see in front of them

    - Employers who don't want to give an intelligent, experienced, agile person the couple of months to learn the new technology flavor-of-the-month

    - Employers who think coders are people who simply bang on the keyboard and, if they could train a cat to do the same, they would do so. They don't understand that it takes either education or experience (and likely both) to create code that is efficient, thread-safe, maintainable, etc. Cats can't do this--intelligent, experienced, educated software developers can.

    - Employers who have an immediate crisis (hmm...how did they let that happen to begin with?) and want someone they can immediately drop into the meat grinder. When you hear "off to a running start" from one of these, beware.

    - Recruiters and employers who don't understant that computer science concepts span languages and technologies and that someone who has grasped them in one implementation of computer science (read: technology) can apply them in another if only given a chance to learn the details (language, API, etc.)

    Non-developers are too focused on buzzwords and not on software. What makes software good software goes way beyond particular languages or API's. There are far more workers who can satisfy employers' needs; for some reason they simply won't use them.

    1. Re:My biggest gripe is... by CthulhuDreamer · · Score: 1

      The emphasis on coder skill sets spills over into other job titles. I'm a hardware/operations guy. I can't code myslef out of a paper bag, but I can set up, maintain and protect the network for a few hundred employees by myself (including reporting and playing helpdesk for the occasional change of scenery). I apply for a basic network admin position, and everything goes splendid until the get to the part where they ask how much Java programming I do. J2EE? C++? .Net? The interview rapidly collapses because apparantly network admins and technicians are supposed to spend the bulk of their time writing code.

    2. Re:My biggest gripe is... by Mateito · · Score: 1

      Unless the company is a big name which has developed relationships with a few, select recruiting firms, the problem is likely to be the recruiter.

      Remember, these guys aren't tech, and a keyword search is about all they can do. I've had some luck getting interviews by forcing the company name out of the recruiter, then giving them a call direct, stating that you've spoken to the recruiter but were looking for more information that the recruiter was able to provide. This means you don't cut the recruiter out of the loop which means no legal wrangling over finder's fees.

      It also allows you to size up the employer. If get upset and say they only ever go through the recruiter, you don't want to work there. You might be qualified, but that doesn't mean that anybody else is.

      Bigger shops tend to have recruiters that are a bit more useful, and the first "recruiter" interview often will filter you based on team-fit and other such non-technical criteria.

    3. Re:My biggest gripe is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "- Employers who don't want to give an intelligent, experienced, agile person the couple of months to learn the new technology flavor-of-the-month"

      I do the technical recruitment for all developers within my company. Why would I hire you and commit to spending two months training you up in the technologies I need RIGHT NOW, only to run the risk of having you jump shop once you are up to speed, when I can hire someone of equal caliber who also has a skillset to match my requirements, can hit the ground running, and can be productive in their first week?
      If you are as committed as you say you are, the why haven't you been keeping up to speed with the latest technologies in your own time? - That's what I have to do in order to stay current, and that's what I expect from my candidates.

    4. Re:My biggest gripe is... by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 1

      This is exactly my experience.

      I'm being laid off at the end of the month. I've been looking around for another job. For the past few years, I've been working in C#, so that's all I have a hope in Hades of getting hired to do. I did interview at a Java place -- I used to code in Java a few years ago, and thought I might like to move back into it -- but they decided I'm too rusty and didn't invite me back. Furthermore, I'm falling at the first hurdle with most of the C# jobs due to my lack of SQL Server experience.

      I quite fancy having a go at some Linux job in C, but there's no way in the universe that any recruiter is going to give me the time of day. The fact that I'm vaguely intelligent and vaguely adaptable doesn't wash with them. There's no C-on-Linux on my CV (there's a little C-on-HPUX from 1998 to 2000, but that's ancient history now), so I clearly can't do the job.

      Sigh.

      -Stephen

    5. Re:My biggest gripe is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why would I hire you and commit to spending two months training you up in the technologies I need RIGHT NOW

      Are you kidding me? What current technology takes 2 months to get up to speed with? If it takes that long for someone to get the hang of something like SQL or Java, they shouldn't be coding. Period. You should fire people like that after the first few weeks (there's a reason many company's benefits don't kick in until a month afer the hire date).

      I can hire someone of equal caliber who also has a skillset to match my requirements, can hit the ground running, and can be productive in their first week?

      If you don't have any problem hiring people with your exact qualifications, go for it. Just don't be surprised when you wind up getting only a few resumes because you're requiring the exact set of technologies your crew and only your crew uses.

      If you are as committed as you say you are, the why haven't you been keeping up to speed with the latest technologies in your own time?

      Because it's not necessary. Look, every new job I've started, I didn't know anything about the language or development environment I was being put into, yet somehow I managed to be productive within that first week. I'm not some genuis either, I simply have experience coding in a variety of different languages. What most shops don't understand is a decent coder should be able to do basic coding tasks in any language in a very short period of time. A lot of the programming job listings I see are like a mechanic job posting requiring experience fixing 1996 Geo Metros - when really they should just be looking for a mechanic with X years of experience fixing cars.

      There are tons of new technologies coming out all the time. A lot of it is impossible to get experience with on your own (many tools are geared and really only ever used by large companies). The truth of it is, I'm burned out at the end of the day doing actual work and don't want to do any more coding on my own time when I've got house repairs to do, the wife to entertain or spend some time relaxing. I'll code on my own to solve a technical problem I have at home, but I'm not going to roll my own SQL server/J2EE combo just to pad my resume. I've got a finite amount of time on this earth, I'm not going to waste it. If you only want to hire people who live IT 24/7, I wish you the best of luck.

  54. Re:Make you MAD by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    Makes you mad, though, that they didn't just hire you on, and increase your budget. I hate salespeople that wedge themselves between the employees and the DM.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  55. Not to be too harsh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "I know this isn't the hub of technology, but when you graduate #2 from Penn State with a 4.0, have 8 years of experience, glowing references, and still have an impossible time finding employment something is wrong."

    So we have 3 factors here:

    1) School
    2) Experience
    3) Location
    4) Person

    That's not quite right, but follow along.

    1) School - no problem. Major university. Well respected. Check! Just be careful you don't talk about that GPA any more. With 8 years of experience, your GPA is officially irrelevant. Pretend like you got a 2.0 GPA when you go into an interview.
    2) Experience - 8 years is a sweet spot. You're not senior yet, you're mid-level, so you're cheap. BUT. What is that experience in? So on a scale of 1-5, you're likely a "3" in this department.
    3) Location - if Pittsburgh doesn't have jobs, then move. D.C. has tons of jobs and its 1/2 a day's car ride away.
    4) Person - this is intertwined with your experience, but if you choose to work doing Eiffel development on Linux for a weather forcasting consultantcy, it means (a) you have no experience in things that matter (b) you make poor choices in your career. Also, you may come across as a bit of an idiot in an interview. Finally, the fact that you won't move tells me you're not serious about a job.

    I went to Penn State and I got a degree in C.S. (this was in the late 70's so perhaps things have changed), so use that logic training. Where is the problem likely to be. Almost certainly the answer is staring you in the mirror. No offense. You're the problem. And I mean that in a constructive way in that I hope you get a better job than me and make a million dollars. But as long as you sit in Pittsburgh with no job, whining about the lack of tech jobs, then I predict you will never get a job and you will stay in your parent's basement.

    Same to you, and you're welcome.

  56. Re: From an employer who transfers risks to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    employees.

    why am i not surprised *you* have a tough time finding talent? you transfer business risks onto your employees and you shelter your income by taking dividends instead of wages.

    business owners are supposed ot have higher risk and reward.

    you offload your risk onto minimum wage employees and *still* want 100% control of the reward. that's incredibly selfish. i'd have to wonder what other processes you have in mind to shift risk toward me and reward towards you that you don't have to legally tell me about.

    most people don't feel like working for people who would do that to others. the folks that show up at your shop obviously don't know better... hence the lack of business skills.

    who's going to move to your area on minimum wage and *huge* business risk without the upside of business ownership and reward?

    nobody with any sense, that's who. perhaps if someone knew you and was able to trust you. but a stranger? fah-getta-boutit.

    i'm sure blaming everyone else but yourself is soothing to the soul - but the problem likely won't go away anytime soon due to the reasons outlined above.

  57. Re:Straight to grad school? Maybe not by Zanate · · Score: 1

    Again, individual circumstances will vary. I am about to graduate with a MS in computer science. I went in to my graduate degree straight out of college. I have not had to pay for any of my grad program because grants and scholarships covered it. There tends to be a lot of money for grad students. The two years earning is offset by assistantships ($13,200 a year in my case) and the initial starting offer ($45,000 for undergrad and $60,000-$70,000 in my case).

  58. Re:Straight to grad school? Maybe not by BigCheese · · Score: 1

    My sister got her doctorate a few years ago when she was pregnant with her second child. I think it worked for her since nobody in their right mind messes around with the Angry Pregnant Lady. At least not more then once.

    --
    The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
  59. Wow then this company is screwed... by grumpyman · · Score: 0

    www.fuckedcompany.com is literally fu*ked as it relies on bad news from companies esp. in IT.

  60. Re: From an employer who transfers risks to... by dada21 · · Score: 1

    Actually I've never put a call out for help -- we get many referals from people we've worked with in the industries we're in (mainly high-rise contracting and large scale buildouts), and the people who come to interview are the ones who know how the shop is run.

    I retain 100% control of the projects and the customers, but the employees make more money than me. I'm probably in the middle of the pack when it comes to earnings, and I'm very focused on staying that way if not declining over time and exiting the business entirely.

    There is nothing wrong with the way I do business, and I think it is a success considering that all my employees own 80%+ of their homes, own all their cars without leases or loans, and have a very solid savings plan. The other upside is most of them have tons of time to spend with their kids or their friends or vacationing, I don't believe in anyone working much more than 1000-1500 hours a year top. Efficiency comes with less hours but more work accomplished.

  61. outsourcing by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    is not a zero sum game. if you had a better understanding of economics, you would understand that there are not simply X jobs to be divied up between outsource and insource. rather, there is simply only the search for efficiency, and this impulse actually leads to more jobs in the long run and more riches for everyone.

    seriously, no hidden agenda, capische?

    but if you and other simpletons continue to think about and talk about the problem as simply "there are 100 jobs, and 50 go to india to day, and 80 will go to india tomorrow, leaving us only 20 jobs left tomorrow" then the sum total of your contribution to solving the "problem" you involve yourself in is to simply demonstrate how ignorant people can be of something they care deeply about

    believe it or not, the more jobs they outsource to india, the more jobs there will be for americans, that pay more

    i leave it to your boundless imagination as to how and why i think that way, and why protectionism is for self-defeating retards

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:outsourcing by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      man...

      You have bought the capitalist line hard.

      What you are ignoring is that:
      1) The people you are competing against are willing to use slave labor.
      2) The people you are competing against are willing to use .03 cents per hour labor
      3) The people you are competing against are still where we were 50 years ago and are more than eager to completely destroy their lower classes with pollutionl, toxins, and mutagens.

      In other words- WE ARE NOT COMPETING ON A EVEN PLAY FIELD.

      i leave it to your boundless imagination as to how and why racing to the bottom against slave labor, rampant pollution, child labor, and sub-poverty wages is not a good idea.

      ---

      Seriously man- WAKE UP.

      India is an example of how this can go -reasonably- well. They have democracy- they have a middle class. Here we have hard competitors- but their wages are going up because they are valuable. As a reasonable libertarian capitalist type, I'm not particularly against Indian competition (except that they engage in blatant age discrimanation and some other things we would consider illegal but it's minor compared to other countries).

      I am against businesses using this cheap labor and then keeping the prices high (often by having laws passed to prohibit reimportation of products that are identical yet 50 to 80% cheaper- re - 2.45 dvd movies in china, $4 medicine in india that we pay $80 for, etc)

      In many other countries, this is not the case. In many other countries including china as a large example, we are competing with -slave labor-. Where we are not competing with slave labor, we are competing with heavily exploited people surrounded by armed guards where those who cause problems mysteriously disappear at night.

      Again- china is artificially holding its currency low (estimates in the WSJ are that it would double if allowed to float freely) - how fair is that?

      ---

      Are you in favor of a race to the bottom where we have a world with 'nobles' and 'serfs' again? Is that what you want? Because that is where we are headed. In the US it takes the form of offshoring jobs- and a select class making multi-million dollar salary's while claiming hardship and foisting thousands of people off on the rest of us to support. Corporations are built to move their costs to us and to maximize their profits.

      Have you so completely bought their propaganda that you can't see how you are paying high taxes so large corporations can use cheap labor and avoid paying benefits to them? How does it feel to cover Walmart's health care bill while a few top executives get to keep the profits?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    2. Re:outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree on most every point. I apprehend that the corporation isn't what is EVIL and WRONG in our capitalist system. The CORPORATION is only a VEHICLE for the collective will of its SHAREHOLDERS. It is a tool.

      What truly is horrific? Our greed, as individuals, as shareholders, we are all collectively on the take. Most executives are hired contractually; some by share, to act as proxy for shareholders, all shareholders. Some really rich people, some normal every day folks investing their retirement.

      My argument is the evil isn't the rich executive's alone to burden; it is the collective, the SHAREHOLDERS that put him to task, they are what power the system. They decide how much profit is enough, when to stop, when are we past organic,sustainable growth, when are we hurting the environment, ravaging long term stability to meet short term expectations?

      I enjoyed your post, it was on the mark. I just don't understand how the CORPORATION is on the rack for all of it. It is the evil within that should be scritinized; the CORPORATION is just a means to an end. Capital preservation first, and further accumulation when possible.

    3. Re:outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I just don't understand how the CORPORATION is on the rack for all of it.

      I think three years ago I would have agreed with your point. The corporation seems to be the only workable vehicle. But something has gone horribly wrong. The evidence of our public and private malfeasance is piling up thick and fast. From environmental destruction, to waging empirical wars that kill 10s of thousands. The corporate structure has lock-stepped into a deathmarched into end-of-civilation problems. A third way must be found. God help us if the deciples of Marx get thier fangs into us.

    4. Re:outsourcing by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      Dude, you need to travel more.

      You need to actually go visit the places you criticize and talk to the people there.

      3 cents/hour wage? Could you point out the country where that happens? Chinese prison laborers pays more than that.

      You are correct that with free trade we aren't competing on an even playing field. India is producing a lot more engineers than we are. China is producing an order of magnitude more engineers than we are.
      Is a guy living in a hut with a dirt floor going to work for less than an American in the suburbs? Damn skippy he is.
      But keep in mind, what's sub-poverty to you can be a major increase in life style for someone else. And last I looked, this is the only country on the planet where the biggest health problem for people living in poverty is obesity.

      Look what's happened in the US. Many auto companies are opening factories places like Tennessee and Georgia because they don't want to pay Detroit wages. If you live in Illinois, its despicable they would close factories near you to take advantage of cheap labor in the south. However, to the folks in the South they are happy to have a "high paying" job. Even with the lower labor costs, these companies are still heading for bankruptcy.

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    5. Re:outsourcing by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Well, among other things.. you need to view "The Corporation".

      it's biased too, of course, but it does a pretty good job of presenting your arguments (pro-development) and then shows some examples of what's actually happening out there.

      You can see it elsewhere in the news too-- Shell-backed african governments are murdering people left and right when they protest the rape of their environment while other Shell people are being all pro-environment in the developed world.

      We have lived in a nice little bubble but that's coming to an end. Reality is on its way back with a vengence.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the comment M-T.

      My guess is that, unfortunately, things are going to have to get much worse before they may possibly get better.

      Just last week I bought the Walmart movie and watched it with a close friend. Even after that, they still went to a Walmart the other day to pick something up. It was convenient, and cheap.

      I'm a positive person -- positive about my own ability to be a good person and do the right thing. As for the rest of the country, I think that there may be just too many stupid and selfish people to turn this boat around.

      I hope I'm wrong. I hope people wake up, look around, and see that we need to make some changes. I hope my patient and persistent explanations get through the heads of friends and family that just don't get it. But so far, those attempts of mine have only met with "please let's not get into this", or "why do we have to talk about this?".

  62. No Wonder - You Pay Minimum Wage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    most of my employees work at minimum wage with a large project bonus (up to 80%), and I have enough people looking to work for us that it isn't the pay structure that isn't helping me find good help.

    There's your problem, despite your claims to the contrary. Workers are risk-averse about their paycheck and they are guaranteed only minimum wage if they work for you!

    You've got a weird salary structure - be thankful you get any applicants. Your companies growth is stunted by your stubborn refusal to "be normal". But apparently you're in denial.

  63. Answer: The Net Number Of Jobs Is Decreasing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article is clearly stating that the number of jobs is decreasing. Just thought you'd like that question answered.

  64. Your problem is... by alienmole · · Score: 1

    ...that "VB.Net" and "developer" don't belong in the same sentence together.

    1. Re:Your problem is... by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Hahah, that's funny. ehhhhhh

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  65. Pittsburgh IT by agentskip007 · · Score: 1
    Hey fellow Pittsburgh'ers,

    Try and apply at Mellon Financial. I am a recent grad from Pitt and I got a job doing IT at Mellon. They are a good company and they do all kinds of fun IT stuff: mainframe, n-tier\distributed (J2EE Websphere mainly) and some Microsoft desktop\n-tier (just got a .NET\Windows Server environment, use VB 6 alot still). However, they are demanding on their IT hires for the good jobs. The want business savy IT people and soft skills are critical. The pay is really good, though.

    I'm curious what your degree was in CS or IT? A 4.0 in either is impressive, but CS degree holders(my degree also) are known to have problems getting jobs at non-IT companies (Mellon included) because we dont seem to get many skills that IT shops need right out of the box. However, IT undergrad degree programs are also known to be weak on the technical background. To quote my manager: "what I need from the undergraduate college system is a IT\CS\Business hybrid degree program."

    The only reason why I got the Mellon job right out of school is that I happen to interview as a sophomore and I found out what a lot of the industry is looking for (none of which I learned directly in CS, but I had to learn on my own). Here is a list for everyone's benefit. Note that this list applies outside Mellon very easily from what I have read.

    • business/soft skills
    • software engineering
    • software architecture
    • OOAD and UML
    • software process/process improvement (CMM)
    • n-tier systems design, development, testing - J2EE/.NET are dominant, but the LAMP stack is also used (not at Mellon though)
    • software project management/project management in general
    • computer/internet/information security
    • data mining/data warehousing/business intelligence

    Overall, I found my CS degree to be a good base for learning the above IT stuff, but I stayed back an extra semester to get a business undergrad in finance. I must say that it has helped on the job a lot and I recommend a business dual/double degree to any students still in college. I found that it was a good way to eat up my elective credits with something productive.

    Good luck and let me know if you apply!

    Mike

    P.S. you might also do well to try Alcoa, PNC, Highmark or PPG.

  66. Not high enough. by Metasquares · · Score: 1

    Considering the high demand and supposed lack of supply (everyone's whining that they can't find programmers these days, for example), why hasn't this affected starting salaries significantly?

  67. IIT != ITT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IIT = Illinois Institute of Technology

    It is not a technical school, but rather a highly regarded engineering school. Don't confuse it with ITT Tech please.

    -Alumn

    1. Re:IIT != ITT by Philosinfinity · · Score: 1

      I wasn't. I used to work with a coworker who went to IIT for CSE. He transferred in his second year. I did lump it into the wrong category though.

  68. i don't dispute anything you say by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and yet i still wholeheartedly support it

    why?

    because there's simply nothing better

    in other words, people rail against nike sweatshops in indonesia. ok, fine. so what's your superior solution?

    the problem is that getting rid of the nike sweatshop does not mean the slave labor workers are suddenly released from their shackles into a beautiful egalitarian world of middle class bohemian western lifestyle

    no, rather they go and starve on the streets. so if the choice is between slave labor and starving, they, you and i would choose the slave labor in the blink of an eye

    see the real problem now?

    so please: i applaud those who decry slave labor in the third world. but please recognize reality: to properly destroy the slave labor conditions YOU HAVE TO PROPOSE A SUPERIOR SOLUTION

    it's the difference between positive criticism and negative criticism

    because a lot of people are empty idealists: they criticize the negative evils they see in this world

    yeah! good for them! do you know how fucking easy that is to do? "that is bad, this is bad, boo hiss" do you know you fucking obvious and useless it is to just say these empty words that everyone ALREADY KNOWS?

    omg! some stupid 20 year old rich western college student prick just told me slave labor is bad! oh my god! what a thunderbolt! I NEVER REALIZED THAT BEFORE! how could i miss that!? where would i be in this world without idealistic rich western simpletons!?

    but if these empty headed shallow idealists would like to take a healthy dose of reality for once, and realize that in this world, solving problems is actually a game of choosing between two negatives, only one slightly worse than the other, in order to pursue progress, the slow, backbreaking thing progress really is, then maybe all of their criticism WOULD ACTUALLY MEAN SOMETHING FOR ONCE

    and when i say positive criticism with positive alternatives, i am talking REALISTIC positive alternatives. you know, like respecting the countries invovled? you can't march into foregin countries and dictate to them how to run their countries, right? and yet these same idealistic retarded simpletons act like these companies control all of the cards. um, no. the source of the real problem? not some evil multimational corporation. it's the LOCAL CORRUPT ASSHOLES. and if you cricize the local corrupt assholes? what do you hear from them? "ARROGANT IMPERIALISTIC NEOCOLONIAL PATRONIZING WESTERNER!"

    see how the problem is a little more complicated than you simpletons suggest yet?

    saying "slave labor is wrong" is easy, useless, and obvious. yeah, clap clap, clap! you win the prize! you're a simple minded retard, you can regurgitate what everyone knows already! ;-P

    saying "slave labor is wrong, and here is my solution XYZ to remove it" is HARD

    so welcome to reality. now try to say something useful, not regurgitate the obvious and think you're actually contributing to solving any problems in this world

    my solution? LET PEOPLE HAVE THEIR JOBS. LET MULITNATIONALS BUILD FACTORIES IN THE THIRD WORLD. then WORK with the slave labor employers and force them improve work conditions, and insist third world countries show more transparency, so we know any money is going to the actual poor people, rather than building the next edition on the warlord's villa

    i know, it's mundane, simple, slow steps. it lacks revolutionary zeal. except revolutions often just lead to a lot burned buildings, and less work for everyone involved

    my solution is slow, unsexy, and uncool. but i'd like you to propose something better

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i don't dispute anything you say by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I do what I can to purchase from ethical companies-- but it is dishearting to see the "ethical" company you were purchasing from turns out to work 13 year olds to death while claiming to spend part of it's profits to help children around the world.

      I would propose something better but I mostly agree with you except for the outcome.

      You think it is hopeless but that things will get better.

      I think it is hopeless and things are only going to get worse.

      All that is left is bread and circuses, I guess.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    2. Re:i don't dispute anything you say by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "o please: i applaud those who decry slave labor in the third world. but please recognize reality: to properly destroy the slave labor conditions YOU HAVE TO PROPOSE A SUPERIOR SOLUTION"

      The point is not "down with slave labor" the point is "down with allowing US corporations outsource to nations that do not play on a level playing field. If an indian firm will meet up to US labor requirements and still be cost effective to outsource to then great. If not imports from that plant should be banned.

  69. More hype by VGfort · · Score: 1

    More hype to try to convince more people to get into IT, so they can buy software, computers, gadgets and to help make sure the employment market stays flooded with competition so wages stay down.

  70. one of many nuggets of economic good news by routerguy666 · · Score: 1

    Still waiting for one of the talking heads to get on tv and spew forth something along the lines of 'hmm, maybe those tax cuts weren't such a bad idea after all'.

  71. IT job right of school by agentskip007 · · Score: 1

    I posted this comment as a reply deep in the thread, but I wanted to open it up for more discussion.

    I am a recent grad (less than 4 four months) and I got a job doing IT for a financial services company. They are a good company and they do all kinds of fun IT stuff: mainframe, n-tier\distributed (J2EE Websphere mainly) and some Microsoft desktop\n-tier (just got a .NET\Windows Server environment, use VB 6 alot still). However, they are demanding on their IT hires for the good jobs. The want business savy IT people and soft skills are critical. The pay is really good, though.

    CS was my primary major in college. The only reason why I got my job right out of school is that I happen to interview with the same company as a sophomore and I found out what a lot of the industry is looking for (none of which I learned directly in CS, but I had to learn on my own). Here is a list for everyone's benefit. Note that this list applies outside my company very easily from what I have read:
            * business/soft skills
            * software engineering
            * software architecture
            * OOAD and UML
            * software process/process improvement (CMM)
            * n-tier systems design, development, testing - J2EE/.NET are dominant, but the LAMP stack is also used
            * software project management/project management in general
            * computer/internet/information security
            * data mining/data warehousing/business intelligence

    Overall, I found my CS degree to be a good base for learning the above IT stuff, but I delayed my graduation an extra semester to get a business undergrad in finance. I must say that it has helped on the job a lot and I recommend a business dual/double degree to any students still in college. I found that it was a good way to eat up my elective credits with something productive.

    I also recommend internships heavliy. I had three total, two paid and one for credit. I was able to get two years experience before even getting out of school. I know none of this helps people who are mid-career, but I wanted to share it with college students.

    So now my question to the community:

    CS degree holders are thought to have problems getting jobs at non-IT companies (my company included) because we dont seem to get many skills that people need right out of the box. However, IT undergrad degree programs are also sometimes considered to be weak on the technical background. To quote my manager: "what I need from the undergraduate college system is a IT\CS\Business hybrid degree program."

    So is the college system failing undergrad students or are companies demanding too much? I think both, but I want other thoughts. I feel that if there was an undergrad program that focused on the above topics on my list + a required internship + some business classes, all undergrads would be better prepared.

    Let me know what you think,

    Mike

  72. you betray your conscience by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    part of having a conscience and a morality is to be optimistic about humanity

    by being pessimistic, you betray the causes you say you care about

    hope is sometimes all there is, and by abandoning hope, you are now part of the problem: loudly saying useless shit

    grow a fucking backbone

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you betray your conscience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, for all the negativity you accuse the parent poster of possessing, you sure do like to condescend and call names. Exactly who has the positive view of humanity? Cause it sure as hell ain't you.

    2. Re:you betray your conscience by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      No.

      My conscience only affects my personal actions towards others. It doesn't affect my view that the corporations and governments have actually gained the upper hand over people in a way that may be unbreakable. It doesn't change my view that from here, things only go downhill.

      Ironically, my life is pretty good- and I might actually make it to a peaceful death before things go all to hell. I'm a bit older than the 22 that you pre-supposed based on no information.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:you betray your conscience by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Oh and by the way.. the rest of your assertions are complete bullshit.

      A conscience is about obeying your own internal moral code- usually embedded in you before you were mature. It's the manifestation of the superego.

      It has nothing to do with being optimistic, pessimistic, or even being moral/immoral with regard to other people. You can very conscienciously kill people and cook them.

      As far as betraying the causes.. you just don't get it. I have repeatedly seen the causes you talk of revealed to be front organizations for other purposes. Some are really backed by corporations-- some are really just feed cash to evil warlords-- some are complete scams-- others provide cushy jobs and free travel for a very select group of the upper classes. I still volunteer where I can see the people I'm actually helping but I've become cynical.

      Almost nothing you see any more is real. How can you make valid decisions when most of the information you use to make those decisions has already been coopted and changed before it ever got to you.

      And some of this even applies to you. Looking over your posts in this thread- I don't see much of what you believe in- what I see is you trolling and bashing for fun. You really just came here for an argument... and your five minutes are up.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  73. Slashdot is no place for proper semantics by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
    Yup...leave those logical remarks and proper semantics out of your comments, please.

    And great job to the FBI for their crack background check on that serial pervert, Brian Doyle, formerly with the Department of Homeland Security!!!!!

    [If the Target Police and Florida police are busting criminal Republicans, and Eliot Spitzer is busting criminal corps..What's the FBI doing???]

  74. Your problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your problem is that your head doesn't belong up your ass... He's offering jobs. Real ones. I'm sure some people will appreciate (being able to pay the bills is nice). And VB.Net isn't quite like VB6. Not my favorite (I'd prefer C#) but it's still OK. So just STFU already.

  75. Definitely by Icephreak1 · · Score: 1

    I'm testament to this upward trend. Just started a longterm contract job today after three and a half years of complete unemployment. Within that time, I had been working for only three months on quick projects. And that's not mentioning the days leading up to my start date I was pursued for employment by two dueling organizations. Over the past month I've had more curious employers contact me after seeing my resume online, and I've had a noticeable increase in interview offers.

    So if any of you are still unemployed, your salvation is near. Keep your heads up.

    - IP

    1. Re:Definitely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you

  76. yes, i'm many things by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    one of the things i am is someone who knows that the human mind's greatest strength is it's ability to find patterns in things. unfortunately, this power is so great, the mind sees patterns and connections that aren't even there. this sometimes leads to superstitious and paranoid behavior in individuals without much heft in the frontal lobes

    it's sad to see people like you trapped in your mental shortcomings, to go through life and think about the world around you the way you do, a helpless "us" versus an all-controlling "them"

    james bond b-grade hollywood fantasies make great entertainment, but not much of a life

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:yes, i'm many things by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "it's sad to see people like you trapped in your mental shortcomings, to go through life and think about the world around you the way you do, a helpless "us" versus an all-controlling "them""

      This cracks me up. That people can be so secure in their trust of the government and powers at be that they feel it is laughable to think said powers have an agenda. And this, despite the fact that the powers at be are exposed in conspiracy after conspiracy. Despite the fact that anyone reading smaller news sites will see stories about US troops murdering 5 children execution style to the back of the head in iraq, including a 7 month year old. Oddly that never makes CNN and FOX.

      Why? The offically CHANGED story says that the building was bombed (nevermind the bullet holes and previous press releases) and that 5 people were there. Wait... that can't be a coverup, we wouldn't cover anything up.

      The government AND powerful corporations are caught again and again in conspiracy. Every round of declassification yields dozens of government conspiracies that are real and DID happen. How many more remain classified? When the government is caught in a conspiracy nobody is surprised, everyone knows they are crooked. Yet, when someone suggests the government could be involved in something crooked they are laughed at and ridiculed.

      There are conspiracy nuts who read tabloids and have pyramid hats. But not everyone who suspects the government and/or corporate interests of conspiracy is a wacko or out of line.

    2. Re:yes, i'm many things by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the backup - but I've no doubt "squared up circle" dude really believes Bush took his very own SAT test and didn't hire someone to take it for him, a common activity among Yalie legacy types who will be getting in regardless of their scores.

      What scares us more...that Bush is just a puppet and someone or some group is actually running things...or that Bush is the one actually "running" things????? Holy Mother of God!!!!

  77. John Cooley: hiring processes, outsourcing by sewagemaster · · Score: 1


    This issue of deepchip has some interesting sections on outsourcing, how hiring really goes on behind the scenes, some interesting data and statistics
    on actual hirings, and how much they spend on hiring people (new grads, monster, stealing people from other companies, etc).

    very very interesting.

  78. Wages have a large variance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an experience Oracle DBA. I started looking for a new job in the last two weeks. I have noticed a few things.

      1. There are a small number of jobs advertised by a large number of recruiters. So you can negotiate with recruiters for the highest rate a.

      2. There is a huge variance in pay. I have seen advertised/been contacted for jobs with rates between $35-85/hour. It's all kind of the same thing. If I see an ad with 'will sponsor h1-b, I don't apply because that will not pay as much.

      3. Recruiters still lie as much as they always do so do not trust them.

      4. There is an increase in interest in me over 2 years ago(last time I looked for a job). Not huge. I don't have people throwing money at me. I also do not know if its just this month its a little better, or if it will last. As I said its also hard to tell, because you have to figure out which recruiter is representing which employer so you don't get dual submitted.

      5. Software development jobs are turning into short term temp work(even if it is highly paid). I don't see alot of permanent positions. Mainly contracts.

  79. Matters... by RingDev · · Score: 1

    What do you do? Where are you located? And how does your resume look?

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  80. Administration and maintenance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prove that this cannot be outsourced.

    And when grunt coding is being done overseas, it is impossible to get the experience to be better than a grunt coder.

    Almost all good coders got their start with a coding job. Now that the coding jobs are gone, how will we develop the higher level skillset?

    Oh and start looking forward to those offshore coders forming their own companies and outcompeting your product with their own cheaper one.

    Japanese cars, anyone?

    There is a reason why people no longer study CS. They know better.

  81. Good article in SJ Mercury today. by Animats · · Score: 1
    This article from the SJ Mercury, Silicon Valley's newspaper, has a more realistic take on the situation. Hiring for top level people is up. ``We're definitely still hiring. Especially algorithmic search. If you know anyone looking, tell them we're hiring.'' -- Yahoo recruiter.

    But below the top level, companies are laying people off.

  82. yes, moron by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i'm negative to negative assholes

    like you, fuckwad

    now let's test your abilities at basic math

    a negative of a negative is a what?

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  83. Good morning! Time to wake up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Job cuts are down because they are quickly running out of people to lay off. Most of the companies they are talking about are operating with as few full time IT people as possible. Everything else is either in the hands of "consultants" or has been either automated, or outsourced to another country. More BS stats that don't mean anything, but get website hits for Slashdot.

  84. Simple Math by DeadBugs · · Score: 2, Funny

    Less jobs = less job cuts. If you cut off 8 fingers, the next round of cuts will be significantly less.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  85. life is a balance by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    there are those who trust too much

    and those who suffer from a deficit in the ability to trust

    these handicaps permeate the problems some people have in every level of their lives: work, romance, friends and family, as well as the way they see their world and the way it works

    so learn the balance, crackpot, or live an impoverished life... not financially impoverished, but mentally

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  86. My two cents... by IceFalcon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have been looking for IT work in my SW Mich area for quite a few months. Lots of calls but each required long commuttes (up to two hours away). One of the most frustrating things I see in job postings are the incredibly broad scope of requirements employers are asking for. Makes me think they want slave labor that can do EVERYTHING for NOTHING. As an example, check this one out from a posting just this morning on Monster. They want a junior level person (2-5 years exp. no college or certifications required). This person will have to do the work of a Security Engineer, Network Engineer, CCIE, MCSE, RCE, Sr. Helpdesk Tech., al'etc. The expectations for this position are so far out of reality that there is NO WAY they will find someone who can do all of this stuff. Bottom line is that employers are refusing to allocate sufficient IT $$$ to their budgets so that they can afford to find (and retain) good, skilled people. So they struggle to fill their few positions and need them to do everything for pennies. They will wind up burning out who ever they end up selecting, only to lose them and have to start the hiring process all over again. Just stupid...
    Company: Sensicore Inc Location: Ann Arbor, MI 48108 Salary/Wage: [not provided] Benifits: Health, Dental, Vision, Life, AD&D, Vacation, Flex Spending, 401k Status: Full Time, Employee Job Category: Computer Services Relevant Work Experience: 2+ to 5 Years Career Level: Experienced (Non-Manager) Education Level: High School or equivalent

    Qualifications, Skills and Personal Attributes:

    Computer clients / server / operating system / Peripherals

    * Hardware platforms: Dell, HP, IBM, Gateway (laptop, workstation, server, peripherals) * Servers/workstation setup, installation, configuration, firmware upgrade, hardware maintenance and upgrade procedures * Ability to troubleshoot computers and peripheral hardware problems * Knowledge of new hardware technologies, implementation, purchasing process, maintenance support contract options and systems warranty * Operating system: Microsoft WinNT/2000/2003, Win XP, Red Hat Linux, CheckPoint Secure Platform( linux kernel), ONTAP ( NetApps proprietary OS), Cisco platform OS * Service packs, Hot fixes, security updates maintenance requirements * Hardisks RAID implementation hardware/software, standby configuration; NFS, NTFS, FAT file system; storage system (NAS, External Tapes backup ); printers, plotters, scanners, video peripherals troubleshooting/repair ability

    Network (LAN /WAN/Intranet/Extranet)

    * Network infrastructure technologies, VLANs, subneting, VNPs switching, routing * Capture, monitor and analyze network traffic, bandwidth demands, real time alert notification via e-mail and SMS regarding network status. * Network security solution, firewalls(Checkpoint, PIX, Kerio, BlackICE), access list on external Cisco routers, hardening Operating System for servers expose to internet communication or/and located in DMZ, NAT AND PAT translation * Intranet virus protection, spam and relaying mail solution, intrusion detection * TCP/IP (HTTP,HTTPS, UDP,TCP,DHCP, DNS, FTP, Telnet, SMTP, SNMP, TFTP ....), routing and routed protocols, MTAs, * Cables wiring, patch panels, wireless network implementation

    Application / software packages

    * Microsoft : Exchange 5.5/2000, SQL2000 server, MS Office (Word, Excel, Access, PowerPoint), MS Visio, MS project, IIS, Frontpage, Terminal services, AD, IIS, internet explorer * Checkpoint: Firewall-1/VPN-1, SecureClient, Smart Defense, Policy server, SecurePlatform * Norton Antivirus Enterprise edition, CiscoWorks, Blackberry server, WS-FTP, Eudora mail server, Norton Gost, TrueImage, Nmap, NetScanTool pro, Veritas BackupExec Enterprise edition, Gftp Server, VNC, Cisco VPN client, WinScp3, PalmOS, MS Outlook,WhatsUp Gold
  87. do what Indians do - LIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do you think every indian professional comes with 10 years of experience? employers want to see that on paper, they give that on paper. what's required to do the job might be much less, both know that. so both are happy in the end.

  88. "proactive" and "flexible" sound nice, but . . . by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    "Be proactive in defining your career direction, and flexible in the industries that you practice in."

    Sounds very nice in theory, doesn't wash in the real world.

    If you are lucky enough to have job, you don't get to chose your career direction. You can study, but study is useless without experience, and your employer decides on your expeerience.

  89. So this pitbull's being eating my leg by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    He's chewed to half way up my thigh, but I think he's getting kind of full. At this rate it'll be hours before he reaches my groin.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  90. Not problem, his choice by ylikone · · Score: 1

    I personally refuse to take jobs involving MS technologies. But that's just me. Others can have those jobs, I certainly don't want them no matter how much they would pay.

    --
    Meh.
  91. H1B's quote is used up by foolish_to_be_here · · Score: 1

    The only reason the layoff's are drying up is that the current H1B visa quota is tapped dry. Attached to the Immigration reform legislation are increased H1B quotas that are set to grow every year. Don't forget to contact your Congressman.

    --
    Please mod me 1 or troll. It's where the truth is these days, even on Slashdot. Beware the power of moderators everywh
  92. Not just no by scgops · · Score: 1
    "I must get my degree because no one respects my nearly 10 years of experience and flawless work ethic..."

    Oh, please. To start, grow up and lose the whiny attitude.

    I'll bet you haven't gotten the jobs you want because you come across poorly in interviews. Similarly, if none of your contract jobs have grown into full-time work, it's likely because, having seen you in action, no one wants you on their team.

    Try being a winner instead of a whiner. Conduct yourself with some class. Improve the atmosphere of each workplace you enter, rather than poisoning it. Do everything you can to add value to the companies you interact with, and maybe they'll consider adding some greenbacks to your wallet.

    I've hired lots of people for sysadmin jobs. With very few exceptions, they've either had no degree or a degree in an unrelated field. I primarily look for the right attitude and team fit. Skills can be taught. Integrity can't.

  93. We make a bit more than that in the UK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must admit, I have a good few years in IT Security, but I'm sitting with a newish CS graduate on his second job, and we're being paid the same.

    Both of us are on contract, earning the UK equivalent of $875 per day. At this rate, we work 6 months (approx $100k), and then find another post. This is in the City, finance, but the work is fairly simple. Mainly hardening system builds, firewall rulesets, bit of crypto procedures on specialist Racal kit.

    Look on Jobserve UK. Search on 'Security and City'. You will find some positions at around $1000+ a day. Of course, you have to commute into London, put up with European limits on the hours you can work, forced breaks and all that...

  94. A job does not a developer make by alienmole · · Score: 1

    People get jobs doing plumbing, too, but that doesn't make them developers either.

  95. different technique by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a couple of different techniques for judging the job market.

    There's the inverse fast foot indicator:
    if I get really sucky service at a restaurant, the job market is good. When restaurant service is great, the job market sucks.

    Then there's the pimp index:
    Number and frequency of calls from recruiters

    And finally, the swag factor:
    When my employer feels the need to increase swag, I know the job market is getting better.

    YMMV

    --
    ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
  96. Re:"proactive" and "flexible" sound nice, but . . by avronius · · Score: 1

    Maintaining a defeatist attitude is the single biggest deterrent to career advancement. In order for anyone to find happiness in the workplace, you need to do some soul searching, as well as discovering some things about the real world: - What type of work makes you happy? - What type of industry needs someone that can do that type of work? - What do I do now that I can apply to that industry / job? - Are there any intermediary steps that I need to take before I can get there? - Do I need to move to a larger centre (or smaller centre) to get those opportunities? Very seldom to people stumble into their dream job. You have a job now, and that's a good thing. Look at what you can take from this job and apply to your next job. When you are job hunting, you should look for jobs that: - are willing to provide training related to what you wish to do* * This does not mean that they will train you for 100% of the job, but would be interested in teaching you as much as 30% of what they would expect you to do. - have a broader scope - allowing you to learn more about how what you do affects other arms of the company - have more responsibility - providing you with some management skills (project or people) - will provide you with experience related to where you are going. Be prepared to relocate for the right opportunity. Understand that the right opportunity is less about money than it is about experience. Remember that you always have a choice in your career direction. Choosing to do nothing is still a choice.

  97. Re:"proactive" and "flexible" sound nice, but . . by avronius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    d'oh - this time in Plain 'ol text...

    Maintaining a defeatist attitude is the single biggest deterrent to career advancement.

    In order for anyone to find happiness in the workplace, you need to do some soul searching, as well as discovering some things about the real world:
    - What type of work makes you happy?
    - What type of industry needs someone that can do that type of work?
    - What do I do now that I can apply to that industry / job?
    - Are there any intermediary steps that I need to take before I can get there?
    - Do I need to move to a larger centre (or smaller centre) to get those opportunities?

    Very seldom to people stumble into their dream job. You have a job now, and that's a good thing. Look at what you can take from this job and apply to your next job.

    When you are job hunting, you should look for jobs that:
    - are willing to provide training related to what you wish to do*
    * This does not mean that they will train you for 100% of the job, but would be interested in teaching you as much as 30% of what they would expect you to do.
    - have a broader scope - allowing you to learn more about how what you do affects other arms of the company
    - have more responsibility - providing you with some management skills (project or people)
    - will provide you with experience related to where you are going.

    Be prepared to relocate for the right opportunity. Understand that the right opportunity is less about money than it is about experience.

    Remember that you always have a choice in your career direction. Choosing to do nothing is still a choice.

  98. IT can be fun, satisfying, and can also pay well. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    A lot depends on your expectations, your tolerance for certain types of BS, and your standard of living. And plain old luck, of course. :-)

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  99. Don't blame capitalism, don't blame communism. by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    blame the People.

    They aren't abiding by any one tenant, but transiently moving in any direction that steals the most of ANYTHING from whomever they employ under them. They covet their neighbors and their neighbors' properties. Have anyone REALY competed in the market, as equal? It's been one mal-nourished company toppling the aggressive anti-competitive monopoly after the next. Where's the competition in that? In the several states alongside the united States of America, there remedy towards the mis-handling of the United States is called the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. That Act applies everywhere, so-long as it doesn't violate a security interest or non-conditioned property rights. If the People want a better world, let them be charitable without tax deductions. Tax deductions are fraud, and so are taxes.

    It appears more likely to fall upon a remedy brought by some manner as said after the fact:
      "And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets." (Matthew 22:39-40); would it be that people that work ill will on eachother, that they have no love for God: God is truth, and any contrary is not of God?

    These are relevant:
      do not kill
      do not steal
      do not bear false witness
      love your neighbor as yourself

    --
    without prejudice
    1. Re:Don't blame capitalism, don't blame communism. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Only problem I have with those is that if you don't qualify as people (because.. say you worship a different god or you don't worship god), then it's okay to kill you, take your daughters and all the rest of your property.

      But that's really a different subject than this.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  100. Yes, all heard and done. by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    Only problem I have with those is that if you don't qualify as people (because.. say you worship a different god or you don't worship god), then it's okay to kill you, take your daughters and all the rest of your property.

    But that's really a different subject than this.


    I comprehend the concern. As I said above, applicable. According to my comprehension, you have just now evinced particularities that are god-like. Worship is not an empty word, as caused in modern interpretation to be the value-less waiving of hands and kicking one's heals to the sky and belly to the ground. Brother, I have the same concern for a neighbor.

    And I know my brother, a neighbor as yourself, has blood and eyes and ears; not a matter composed of fiction, but what has a sound mind to not tresspass on someone's or somebody's interests and rights. Considering these, I can only be as honourable as someone will allow their honour of life to not tresspass upon me. Show me someone that does not kill, does not steal; loves their neighbor as themself, and repents of tresspass, allows or acknowledges redress of grievances: by their living will.

    What of the light of day?

    --
    without prejudice