Slashdot Mirror


New MythTV Based PVR Available

aotea_Joe writes "OpenMedia is putting together a mad crazy Linux based home media pc. It's DVB-T and HDTV capable, network ready (streaming, control, sharing). Has all the standard PVR features (real time pause, scheduling, listings etc). Plus you own the hardware, get support and get updates/maintenance. Is it too good to be true?"

214 comments

  1. Just SAY NO! to the USA? by crazyjeremy · · Score: 1
    Prices are in NZ Dollars (inc GST) and are subject to change without notice. At this time, orders are only taken within New Zealand. Our standard preferred payment method is by bank transfer. Details will be sent to you at time of order.

    And check out the prices!!

    1. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by tepples · · Score: 1

      there is only 95% of the worlds population left to sell it to

      Including the majority who don't have reliable electricity in the home?

    2. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Like Californians.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by Meumeu · · Score: 1

      "only within New Zealand" is a bit more restrictive than "only outside the US"...

    4. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Hardly new - D1's been doing this in Australia for 18 months or so.

      Of course, they're pretty coy about it being a mythtv build.

      And the exchange rate is something like 40,000 NZ Sheep Barter Units to the USD, so it's pretty cheap really. If you could get one shipped over, that is. And if you crazy americans would adhere to proper standards, like PAL and DVB-T.

      (ducks and runs for cover)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    5. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 1
      And check out the prices!!

      umm yeah, the sites down, but here some pricing:

      There are three standard configurations for myPVR, and a choice of two case styles.

      Configuration Price (inc GST) Base

      Athlon 64 3000+ CPU (or above)
      512 MB Ram
      DVD ± RW DL Drive
      Remote control
      Wireless keyboard and mouse
      Choice of black or silver HTPC cases.
      12 Months return to base hardware support
      3 Months standard software support
      (updates, patches and online assistance)
      Special Offer - For a limited period software support extended to 6 months

      Single Tuner - 250

      Single Tuner Hauppauge PVR 150 Capture Card
      Single 250GB Hard Drive
      $1499

      Dual Tuner - 250

      Dual Tuner Hauppauge PVR 500 Capture Card
      Single 250GB Hard Drive
      $1699

      Dual Tuner - 400

      Dual Tuner Hauppauge PVR 500 Capture Card
      Single 400GB Hard Drive
      $1949

      --
      Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
    6. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god, that's the greatest description of the population of the United States I've ever head...

    7. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got ripped off. Those tuners shouldn't cost nearly so much. You can build an HDTV capable system for far less if you look around more carefully.

    8. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Actually, Texas was the most recent state to have rolling blackouts. CA hasn't had them for quite some time.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    9. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      No no, they called them rolling *brownouts* here. Some cities weren't even hit. Strangely enough, Richardson, the North Dallas suburb where my servers live, kept power continuously that day while my computers in Dallas lost juice for a few minutes. Not sure how or why but maybe it had something to do with record highs really early in the year (100+).

    10. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by idonthack · · Score: 1
      Not sure how or why but maybe it had something to do with record highs really early in the year (100+).
      That is what caused it. Power equipment was scheduled for maintainence during this usually cool time of year, but because of the high temperatures more people were using their electric ACs and with some of the equipment down the grid couldn't handle it.
      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    11. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by drakaan · · Score: 1

      And fortunately, thanks to the efforts of many of the people in that rounding error, you have an internet, computer, and forum in which to have read that description. ;)

      Yeah, some of us (US-ians) are shortsighted, pompous, insipid asses, but we're not all *completely* worthless, you know.

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    12. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Yep, and as any tech worth his weight in cat5 knows, the only time users REALLY need a resource is when they don't have access to it.

        Just last weekend we had a 48-hour maintenance window (meaning everything is going down, don't even TRY to work). This was on a saturday and sunday, with sunday being Easter sunday. The entire company got an email a week in advance and we assumed we had plenty of time to do our major rework/upgrade of lots of things. We shut everything down and started working on Saturday morning.

        Then the calls from our CEO started coming. He called every fucking hour just to see 'how things are coming along'. In other words, when is his email going to be back up? The explanation given was that the crystal ball is cracked and would he please refer to the email sent out earlier in the week. In the meantime he could feel free to spend time with his family.

        Our illustrious CFO decided he'd stop by on sunday afternoon and 'try to get some work done'. We also had one of our ME's come in and try to do the same. Now granted, these are both family men with young children, so 'getting some work done' probably translates to 'getting away from the little monsters and the wife for a few hours'. I know they weren't dumb enough to not heed our maintenance window warning, but they still showed up anyway.

        Next time we decide to do maintenance on the weekend, I'm bringing one of those stupid little putting greens with a single hole. That'll keep the execs busy while we get work done.

    13. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by blogeasy · · Score: 1

      The United States price equivalent would be about $940 USD for $1499 NZD. Doesn't seem too bad. If it was possible to get this down to about $300 USD you would hit the mass market.

      --

      Browse the Information Directory
    14. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by spudgun · · Score: 1

      And the exchange rate is something like 40,000 NZ Sheep Barter Units to the USD, so it's pretty cheap really. If you could get one shipped over, that is. And if you crazy americans would adhere to proper standards, like PAL and DVB-T.

      Don't forget 220 V power outlets.

      --
      Type unto others as you would have them type unto you.
    15. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by openmedia_nz · · Score: 1

      1. We don't have HDTV in New Zealand
      2. Prices for this type of HW are a lot higher in NZ than the US

      I'm actually looking at HDTV capable kit, and it is far cheaper for me to import from UK retail than buy direct from the manufacturer due to bulk deals. Hows that for crazy.

      --
      OpenMedia Limited - Home of NZ's first OpenSource PVR http://www.openmedia.co.nz
    16. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by peej73 · · Score: 1

      The US has some claim on the internet (albeit less that you might think). Just feel lucky for the Scots and, more recently, the Aussies who have invented pretty much everything (including quite large portions of the eglomeration we call the internet). Having said the I've lived in the US and you are right, the stereotype is just that. There are many things we could learn from the US but sadly we seem, for the most part, to only assimilate the bad stuff.

    17. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      We've got one of the asshole IT departments at my job too; they sent out e-mails about a week in advance of any planned outages; they actually seem to think nobody ever goes on vacation for more than 4 days and thus a weeks notice is long enough. Ofcourse any idiot understands that a certain percentage of collegues won't be able to read an e-mail within any specific one week timespan.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    18. Re:Just SAY NO! to the USA? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Nobody was on vacation, ass. It's such a small company that everyone reads all their email. These folks were just hard headed.

  2. money by raffe · · Score: 1

    Does the mythtv people get anything out of this?

    1. Re:money by elrous0 · · Score: 1, Funny
      Does the mythtv people get anything out of this?

      Yeah, a hearty "Thanks for doing our work for free, suckers!"

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:money by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why? its like saying does linus get anything from redhat?

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    3. Re:money by Cat_Byte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does the mythtv people get anything out of this?

      No but these people need to look at the zap2it guide information download terms of use. They can't sell something for profit that downloads from their free service.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    4. Re:money by caldroun · · Score: 1

      Yes, he did...Stocks when they went public.

      --
      "If you have done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways" -- hhgg
    5. Re:money by dick+pubes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You're from the inner-city, isn't you?

    6. Re:money by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which was mighty nice of them, but they weren't required to do so.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    7. Re:money by The+Asmodeus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      100% Correct.

      Zap2it has been awesome to let us use their listing feed. But they expressly forbid this kind of for-profit usage. I'm hoping they are using another feed..

      Of course, they might say on their site if it wasn't melted already...

    8. Re:money by itsdapead · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why (in the absence of a non /.ed TFA) do people assume its using Zap2it? I think that is US only anyway. Note they said it supports DVB-T (Thats digital terrestrial TV outside the US). Don't know about NZ but in the UK there is a free 7-day EPG broadcast with the DVB-T signal which MythTV happily grabs. Plus MythTV supports xmltv which can scrape listings from a variety of websites worldwide.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    9. Re:money by james_orr · · Score: 1

      But they're not selling the software (which would also be a GPL violation, wouldn't it?).

      They are selling the hardware plus a setup fee and charging for support.

    10. Re:money by beady · · Score: 1

      Nope. You can sell GPL software, but just like when you give it away for free, you must provide machine-readable source code for free (or possibly for the cost of the medium it's provided on).

    11. Re:money by hexxeh · · Score: 1

      Except it's only available in New Zeland, which doesn't use zap2it.

    12. Re:money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It feels good to be appreciated...

    13. Re:money by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does[sic] the mythtv people get anything out of this?

      Yes, sort of. They get any changes or bugfixes this company makes to the code. Basically, they get free labor. Since MythTV is an open project the license is designed to benefit the users, not the developers (except in that the developers are users, which is why they are developing it).

    14. Re:money by BoldAndBusted · · Score: 1

      Why (in the absence of a non /.ed TFA) do people assume its using Zap2it?

      Um, because MythTV does? And we don't want anything to damage the relationship with TMS/Zap2It?

    15. Re:money by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Quoth the MythTV documentation:

      TMS is one of the primary providers for program listing data in the United States and Canada.

      The box in question is currently only sold in New Zealand.

      So I think its safe to say that the box probably doesn't use Zap2It!

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    16. Re:money by robthebob · · Score: 2, Funny

      Um, America != World...

    17. Re:money by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      Zap2IT is for US (and Canada?) only. on DVB-T systems in NZ they'd be using the DVB EIT information, and possibly xmltv if they wanted.

      Using the DVB EIT info would provide plug-and-play zeroconfig so I'm betting they do not use xmltv by default (would require user intervention probably)

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    18. Re:money by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I couldn't get to TFA so I was unaware it was in NZ.

      Thanks for the info. Altho I still don't like the idea of making a profit off of someone elses freeware app. Selling it as a turn-key set would mean they are supporting it as well.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    19. Re:money by starman97 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they should build in a torrent client/server into Myth
      so the users can share the bandwidth load of the schedule.

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
    20. Re:money by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

      The whole point of Free Software is helping your neighbor, and that's exactly what the MythTv guys are doing. Hopefully businesses will eventually realise the importance of this software and help fund it.

      That's exactly what has happened in the past with successful work; Linus was hired by a consortium funded my large companies. Stallman is given MIT university grants (AFAIK). The original gaim developer was hired by Google. There are many, many other examples

      Often times, these projects help the developer through job offers, or sponsorship from profiting parties. While there aren't any billionaires yet (and there probably never will be) the developers often do profit, though in the longer term. They do it without betraying the community, and by giving their stuff away for free.

    21. Re:money by spagetti_code · · Score: 1

      I'm a NZ mythtv owner/user. There are no good locations (that I know of anyway) for TV listings. All reliable systems currently rely on scraping either Sky (the subscriber channels) or TV1,2,3,4 websites.

      Its pretty ugly, but the scrapers are impressive and do their job well. The pick of the bunch is written by Riven. Its a .Net app that runs in Mono.

      My suspicion is that these guys are using Riven's work, or they have inked a deal with Sky. It is extremely unlikly they have inked a deal with any of the free to air channels due to ad-skipping. I understand that requests have been made to Sky in the past, which were rebuffed.

    22. Re:money by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Also a NZ Mythtv user...

      TVNZ does send free EPG data over DVB-T (only available in Akl IIRC). Unfortunately, it is crap.

      Sky however, sends unencrypted EPG over DVB-S that is of quite high quality. The reason that you cannot get it on your system is that it is copyright by sky so the people with it (anyone with a DVB-S card) cannot share it for long before sky shuts it down. However, any mythtv system with a DVB-S card in it can get sky's EPG data legally.

      Sadly, you cannot decrypt sky using your DVB-S card because that breaks your licence agreement with sky... Even though you need a valid sky CAM card/account to be able to decrypt it. Pathetic huh? :-(

    23. Re:money by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Yah, sorta... NZ has 14 day EPG via DVB-T thanks to TVNZ. Unfortunately the bozos that run TVNZ cannot generate valid EPG data to save themselves, making the data somewhat useless. Sky (no idea if it is the same company as Sky in the UK) can be picked up via DVB-S which will give you fairly decent unencrypted EPG and unencrypted FTA channels (and lots of encrypted channels).

    24. Re:money by openmedia_nz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes. We are already contributing patches and tweaks back via the Knoppmyth community. Our support team monitors the Knoppmyth Forum and the MythTV mailing list. We are fully comitted to OpenSource and any major changes/patches/tweaks will be made publically available. In order to support a diverse range of customers we need to fully test all patches before rolling them out. Any issues/problems are reported back, if possible with a fix. Hence the whole community benefits.

      --
      OpenMedia Limited - Home of NZ's first OpenSource PVR http://www.openmedia.co.nz
    25. Re:money by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      No but these people need to look at the zap2it guide information download terms of use. They can't sell something for profit that downloads from their free service.
      Zap2it is irrelevant because they don't provide listings for New Zealand, where this box is being sold. Aside from that, the box is not being sold with Zap2it's data on it, just the ability to use Zap2it's data. I can't see how Zap2it can refuse service just because someone is using a paid-for device to access their feed.
    26. Re:money by Plaid+Phantom · · Score: 1

      For now, my friend. For now. Mwahaha!

      --
      All comments are properties and trademarks of the voices in my head. Not like I'm gonna claim them.
  3. Mad Crazy??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What the??? Can we at least create a summary that doesn't sound like someone playing counter strike wrote it?

    1. Re:Mad Crazy??? by lbmouse · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What the??? Can we at least create a summary that doesn't sound like someone playing counter strike wrote it?

      Could be worse.

  4. That was fast by gillrock · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The site is /.ed already. Is there a record on the fastest speed of a /.ed site?

    --
    "...the shortest distance between two points may be straight line, but it is by no means the most interesting."
  5. ChavDot: News fo Chavs, stuff dat be madder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    OpenMedia is putting together a mad crazy Linux based home media pc.

    Is it the mad crazy super duper bomb diggity, for shizzle?

    1. Re:ChavDot: News fo Chavs, stuff dat be madder. by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Speaking as a time-traveller representing the people of the 1980's, my people would like to respond with an official "WORD!"

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:ChavDot: News fo Chavs, stuff dat be madder. by dick+pubes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Seriously, for a split second I thought I was reading Digg.

    3. Re:ChavDot: News fo Chavs, stuff dat be madder. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

      Would this be a "word" to my mother, or more of a simple "word up?"

    4. Re:ChavDot: News fo Chavs, stuff dat be madder. by spikeb · · Score: 3, Funny

      word to your mother, vanilla ice style

    5. Re:ChavDot: News fo Chavs, stuff dat be madder. by starrcake · · Score: 1

      w0rd, my nizzle from anizzle mizzle...

    6. Re:ChavDot: News fo Chavs, stuff dat be madder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mr. Pibb + Red Vines = Crazy Delicious

    7. Re:ChavDot: News fo Chavs, stuff dat be madder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


      Speaking as a time-traveller representing the people of the 1980's, my people would like to respond with an official "WORD!"

      Would this be a "word" to my mother, or more of a simple "word up?"


      MS Word!

      -Clippy

    8. Re:ChavDot: News fo Chavs, stuff dat be madder. by MyNameIsEarl · · Score: 1

      Is it the mad crazy super duper bomb diggity, for shizzle? The correct term is fo shizzle. Just call me the l33t sp33k grammar nazi.

    9. Re:ChavDot: News fo Chavs, stuff dat be madder. by gbutler69 · · Score: 0

      Word was 1990's thing. Noone said "Word" in the '80's. Get a clue!

      --
      Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    10. Re:ChavDot: News fo Chavs, stuff dat be madder. by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      oh man, is that you ? Just watched your video,

      Vanilla Ice!!

    11. Re:ChavDot: News fo Chavs, stuff dat be madder. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Not only do we use "WORD", millenium-dweller, we also use Spanish variations such as "Palabra."

      One day, if you millenium-dwellers work hard, you may once again rediscover our wisdom, our glorious slang, and our Aidas jogging suits.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:ChavDot: News fo Chavs, stuff dat be madder. by gnovos · · Score: 1

      Would this be a "word" to my mother, or more of a simple "word up?"

      Or a mad crazy word up to my mizzle?

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  6. Mythical Exhortations by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Has all the standard PVR features (real time pause, scheduling, listings etc). Plus you own the hardware, get support and get updates/maintenance. Is it too good to be true?

    Some say that the fact that people might believe that MythTV is too good to be true is a myth. But I am not sure, so we are sending some scientists to test it. We can then find out if it indeed exists, observe its behaviour, and how it is supported by its environment. Stay tuned for the real-time results.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Mythical Exhortations by ID10T5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Called in the Mythbusters, eh?

    2. Re:Mythical Exhortations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is it too good to be true? sounds like a job for Mythbusters!

      e

  7. TiVo patents? by tepples · · Score: 1

    What will TiVo's legal department have to say about this product in jurisdictions where TiVo owns broad patents? Could this be part of the reason why the product isn't shipping to the United States?

  8. cablecard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Ummmm....not really. If it doesn't support CableCard....MOVE ON...wait I should create a website. Lets call it moveon.org ( blowhards ).

    Anyway this is no different than the HP systems that support MCE. Come on get on board and put together some innovation, isn't that what OSS was suppose to be about...but atlas, not really. They just do the same thing as everyone else and just put it in a different package......How many linux distro's do we have again ? If its more than 5 you can NEVER EVER AGAIN complain about MS having to many windows version.

    Seriously though if someone is going to repackage MythTV and offer an OSS DVR like that including the hardware it should support cablecard(s).

    1. Re:cablecard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm....not really. If it doesn't support CableCard....MOVE ON.

      Don't be silly. CableCARD readers won't be sold to such vendors. The content providers won't allow open-source DVR software that might output an unencrypted video stream. Read more about it here.

      Welcome to the brave new world where you're no longer able to build your own consumer electronics devices.

    2. Re:cablecard by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Ummmm....not really. If it doesn't support CableCard....MOVE ON...

      Yeah, because their market (in New Zealand) is sure demanding CableCard support... right?

    3. Re:cablecard by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      For those of us who would rather cut off our heads rather than deal with a cable company again, I'm perfectly happy to buy without giving a second thought to cablecard. I went to satellite TV about five years ago and will never go back.

  9. Let me guess by edwardpickman · · Score: 3, Funny

    They are using one as a server while they watch a movie?

  10. Are they paying TiVo Licensing Fees? by IflyRC · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wonder if any of the technology in this makes use of anything patented by Tivo. It should be interesting to see if Tivo ever goes after them.

    1. Re:Are they paying TiVo Licensing Fees? by Danga · · Score: 1

      It should be interesting to see if Tivo ever goes after them.

      I think this is why it is only for sale in New Zealand right now. You can bet your ass that if they try to enter the US market or anywhere else Tivo has jurisdiction that Tivo will go after them tooth and nail. This will be interesting to see develop.

      On another note, I am not exactly sure how I feel about a for profit business using MythTV like this. It is one thing to sell a service/device that takes advantage of a couple Open Source tools just to use as tools but this is basically letting ALL of the software work be done by someone else and then profiting on it. I would hope they would at least donate some proceeds to MythTV (which I don't think is even easily done as I don't see any information how to donate at the MythTV website).

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    2. Re:Are they paying TiVo Licensing Fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *is out of the loop*

      Why would they pay TiVo Licencing fees? Is this another one of your stoopid software patents?

    3. Re:Are they paying TiVo Licensing Fees? by Gorshkov · · Score: 1

      So how is what they're doing any different from what RedHat does?

    4. Re:Are they paying TiVo Licensing Fees? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      On another note, I am not exactly sure how I feel about a for profit business using MythTV like this. It is one thing to sell a service/device that takes advantage of a couple Open Source tools just to use as tools but this is basically letting ALL of the software work be done by someone else and then profiting on it. I would hope they would at least donate some proceeds to MythTV.

      Actually, I don't have any problem with it at all. It is a self correcting problem. If the developers don't like it, they can stop doing the work. Then this company must either hire people to do the work or do it themselves. In any case, this company will be getting feedback from users and be pressured to make changes to the software including bugfixes and new features. This means they will almost certainly pay either the original developers or in house talent to make those fixes/changes. All this labor is then given back to the MythTV developers. Also, wider adoption of the software generates more interest and gets more people involved. In the long run, they may become like Apache, used by most people and developed by a core of engineers who are paid by important users of the software.

    5. Re:Are they paying TiVo Licensing Fees? by TigerTime · · Score: 1

      Everybody has patents or licenses, even the Open Source community. How would you feel if Microsoft just started stealing code from Mozilla and Linux? I'm pretty sure they'd sue Microsoft as well.

      TIVO holds the patent for "pausing live TV" and "recording to a HD". As long as this MythTV box does not pause live tv and doesn't record to a hard drive, then they're safe. Otherwise, infringement.

    6. Re:Are they paying TiVo Licensing Fees? by Danga · · Score: 1

      "pausing live TV" and "recording to a HD"

      It really pisses me off you can even have a patent on those two things. Having a patent on how you implement the two things I can see but give me a break. I think I am going to go patent "Recording TV to any device that stores binary data except a HD"...

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    7. Re:Are they paying TiVo Licensing Fees? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      On another note, I am not exactly sure how I feel about a for profit business using MythTV like this. It is one thing to sell a service/device that takes advantage of a couple Open Source tools just to use as tools but this is basically letting ALL of the software work be done by someone else and then profiting on it.

      Are you one of the MythTV developers? No? Then who cares how you feel about it?

      If the MythTV developers were worried about this, they never would have released it as free and open-source software.

      I would hope they would at least donate some proceeds to MythTV

      That might be nice, but it certainly isn't mandatory. Realistically however, if this company would like some changes or improvements made to MythTV, one good option would be to pay the original developers to do the work. Or they could do it themselves, but in that case, the GPL requires they make the changes available to customers, and it'd only be sensible to submit them back to the original developers too to avoid forking. Either way, the MythTV team would be getting something out of this company using their software.

      Open-source is a totally different way of creating software than the proprietary method. If I were working on an interesting project at home, I certainly wouldn't keep it all to myself (esp. if it worked better to have some help on it) just because someone else might make money with it. Are you going to just never do anything constructive and interesting because someone else might copy it and make money with it? If everyone did that, a lot of stuff would never be made.

    8. Re:Are they paying TiVo Licensing Fees? by Danga · · Score: 1

      Are you one of the MythTV developers? No? Then who cares how you feel about it?

      I care how I feel about it.

      That might be nice, but it certainly isn't mandatory.
      No shit sherlock, I know it isn't mandatory, I hate that people keep stating the obvious. I just hope both sides get some benefit and not just OpenMedia.

      Are you going to just never do anything constructive and interesting because someone else might copy it and make money with it?

      No, I don't have any projects of my own right now but I have worked on a few open source projects and if I do come up with a project that I think other people could use then I wouldn't mind putting it out into the open source community. I also never said I was against them using it, it just made me think about what is going on more. They effectively put together a computer with a TV card and then slapped in someone elses software, which makes the WHOLE project work and are charging ~900USD+ for it. It is a cool product and if I didn't already have almost the same thing already setup (that cost me maybe 400 bucks and is superior) then I would consider getting one. If the price wasn't so freakin high I would consider getting one for my parents, but damn, not for that much, get it down to $300 bucks and it would storm the market (as long as its legal). This is the first major consumer hardware that I can think of that is founded solely on an open source project and it will be interesting to see what happens.

      If everyone did that, a lot of stuff would never be made.
      This is very true, but if you are a software developer and you never make any money off of some things that you create then it is pretty hard to put food on the table.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    9. Re:Are they paying TiVo Licensing Fees? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I care how I feel about it.

      No shit sherlock, I know it isn't mandatory, I hate that people keep stating the obvious. I just hope both sides get some benefit and not just OpenMedia.

      No, I don't have any projects of my own right now but I have worked on a few open source projects and if I do come up with a project that I think other people could use then I wouldn't mind putting it out into the open source community. I also never said I was against them using it, it just made me think about what is going on more.


      The thing is, this is something that comes up with any open source project, not just OpenMedia's. That's the whole nature of open-source: someone can just take your code, put it in your product, make money from it, and never send you a dime. But open-source seems to be doing just fine despite this concern. None of this is anything new, and if you've worked on open-source projects yourself, I'm surprised you're even worried about this.

      TiVo's been using Linux for a long time, and I doubt has sent anything back to Linus and friends. So has LinkSys. So have many other companies making embedded products. Profitting directly off software sales isn't part of open-source methodology.

      They effectively put together a computer with a TV card and then slapped in someone elses software, which makes the WHOLE project work and are charging ~900USD+ for it. It is a cool product and if I didn't already have almost the same thing already setup (that cost me maybe 400 bucks and is superior) then I would consider getting one. If the price wasn't so freakin high I would consider getting one for my parents, but damn, not for that much, get it down to $300 bucks and it would storm the market (as long as its legal). This is the first major consumer hardware that I can think of that is founded solely on an open source project and it will be interesting to see what happens.

      As another poster wrote, there's other companies apparently selling Hylafax servers, where (it sounds like) they just build a box with some faxmodems, slap Linux and Hylafax in there, and sell it for a huge markup. In addition, there's lots of NAS boxes out there which are basically just Linux, Samba, NFS (maybe), and cost quite a lot more than their constituent components.

      But you're missing many things here I think:
      1) Time is valuable. How long does it take you to set up all that stuff? If you're a company, it's probably cheaper to buy instead of make, especially if your existing employees are already busy.
      2) All these mostly-open-source products probably still have some extra software in them; a nice interface, some custom glue code, etc. You can't just take a few open-source products and install them on a system and sell it as a product. There's always some customization that has to be done.
      3) A big markup doesn't mean the company has a big profit margin. Selling MythTV boxes costs more than just the hardware; there's the development time of putting the software together, writing any custom software to make it product-worthy, testing it all out and working out any bugs, keeping up with the open-source projects and their changes and updates and pulling those into your product, etc. Then there's the business aspect: building the boxes and loading the software takes time, and probably some extra employees who have to be paid. Finding and working with distributors or vendors, advertising, etc. all take a lot of time. Obtaining capital to get all this started takes effort and time, and then those loans have to be paid back with interest. When you add all this extra stuff up, it costs a lot of money, which is reflected in the product price. If OpenMedia was the size of Sony and was expecting to sell 10 millions units, the price would be much lower since they could get big discounts on the hardware, and the other costs would be spread over many more units. But products from small companies with low volumes are usually much more expensive because they lack the economies of scale th

    10. Re:Are they paying TiVo Licensing Fees? by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      ... but this is basically letting ALL of the software work be done by someone else and then profiting on it. I would hope they would at least donate some proceeds to MythTV ...

      What, you mean like publically contributing their own modified code back to the MythTV community, of which they are a part? You couldn't even be bothered to check before assuming the worst about them? Are you a troll? (Pardon, that last question was just a rhetorical one.)

  11. Priorities. by chinton · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Maybe they need some network ready servers, first.

  12. What's the big deal..... by phekno · · Score: 0

    I've been running a Myth machine for a while. I think I only paid around $350 (US) for most of the hardware (tuner card, case, hard drive). Of course, the rest of the hardware I came up on loot.

    On another note, what happens when HD programs get DRM'd? No more MythTV?

    1. Re:What's the big deal..... by Delphiki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      DRM should never be an issue if you're using a tuner card created before broadcast flag legislation gets passed (if it ever does). But unfortunately anyone who wants cable stations in HDTV is already screwed. MythTV along with just about every other decent DVR solution doesn't support CableCard or any other way to get digital channels off cable unless you are lucky enough to have a cable company who allows you to use firewire on the cable box or doesn't encrypt their signals. So basically this device won't help you watch The Sopranos in HDTV. Lame.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    2. Re:What's the big deal..... by fracai · · Score: 1

      The FCC requires FireWire on every cable box.
      This is the first link I found:
      http://www.gizmodo.com/archives/fcc-requires-firew ire-on-all-cable-boxes-015708.php

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    3. Re:What's the big deal..... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      The jack doesn't help if the data is encrypted.

      The broadcast stations may not be encrypted, but there's no point in paying your cable company for those. They're free over the air.

    4. Re:What's the big deal..... by sketchydave · · Score: 0

      Just an FYI, I have DVR through Comcast and the firewire port is active. I don't know if this is for every local, but they use the Motorola 6412 box and wikipedia has info on how to connect and transfer via firewire:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_6412

      I've connected to my cable box with my laptop via Firewire and was able to use it like a capture device.

      I've thought of building my own MythTV box, but in Boston Comcast charges an extra $14 a month for both HDTV and DVR and for me quite frankly its worth my while to just pay that compared to the time and cost of building my own system. I'm not knocking MythTV at all, I think its great but unless they resurrect the broadcast flag I'm not going to bother with it quite yet.

    5. Re:What's the big deal..... by Delphiki · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I tried using the comcast DVR but it was such an aweful device that I decided to give up HDTV and go back to using my TiVo. It couldn't even handle creating a season pass or automatically deleting shows to make room for new shows. What I really want is a Windows MCE box so I can stream HDTV to my Xbox 360, but if I could get a Series 3 TiVo or quiet MythTV box in a form factor that'll fit in my TV stand that would let me get all of my HDTV channels, I would take it. Honestly, a decent HDTV DVR is like the impossible to find unicorn for me right now.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    6. Re:What's the big deal..... by sketchydave · · Score: 0

      I have the advantage of never owning a Tivo, so I don't know what I'm missing. I'm content enough to stick with Comcast until something really worth my while comes out. Like the HD Unicon :-)

  13. No. by PatrickThomson · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No.

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  14. Digital Broadcast flag? by tradjik · · Score: 1

    Since the site is down already - did any of the people who got to the site check out support for the broadcast flag?

    If cable companies start using the protection with the didital flags would it render this machine useless? I know the TiVo does support it - after it was (un)intentionally turned on some poor user's Family Guy recording.

    Down the road will we need to worry about not being able to use our toys if it doesn't fall into the industry's "supported device" list?

    1. Re:Digital Broadcast flag? by supun · · Score: 2, Informative

      pcHDTV - http://www.pchdtv.com/

      ----
      The HD-2000 was a 5v PCI card with two RF inputs and mono sound for NTSC. The HD-3000 is a similar card with one RF input, one SVIDEO input, one COMPOSITE VIDEO and AUDIO input and one audo stereo output for NTSC but the HD-3000 also supports Cable/QAM. Neithor card detects the broadcast
      ----

      --
      :w!
    2. Re:Digital Broadcast flag? by supun · · Score: 1

      er, append "flag" on the end :)

      --
      :w!
    3. Re:Digital Broadcast flag? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Cable companies in Australia already rendered machines like this (mostly) useless. That is, useless unless you only care about the six channels that aren't encrypted. I can only guess that NZ already suffer from the same problem, but who knows...

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    4. Re:Digital Broadcast flag? by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      The way I understand it is that the "broadcast flag" (at least as proposed in the US) is basically on the honor system. To enforce it, the media cartels are still trying to pass a law that requires all tuner makers to "respect" it, basically creating a legal lock around the whole issue (see also: DMCA).

    5. Re:Digital Broadcast flag? by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1

      If you have Foxtel digital, can't you just use the autotune functionality, and just tell the pvr when to record?

    6. Re:Digital Broadcast flag? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Yes. As people have already pointed out, it's already quite possible to do any of this by programming both devices separately. However, the entire point of a DVR is to automate this so that you don't *have* to deal with them both separately. In many cases this is possible by having the DVR box send remote control signals to the cable box. However, that still prevents you watching another channel while it's recording. A true DVR system could handle two channels at once, but I suspect that flexibility is what worries Foxtel.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  15. Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by UseFree.org · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MythTV-based systems like OpenMedia will blow DRM-crippled products like Intel's Viiv right out of the water.

    I mean, who in their right mind would buy a restrictive system like Viiv when free-as-in-speech OpenMedia systems are available? Of course, the challenge is explaining to consumers why Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) is against their interests, and spreading the word that MythTV-based systems are superior to DRM-crippled offerings.

    --
    Get computers and accessories from Linux-friendly manufacturers
    1. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by clydemaxwell · · Score: 1

      Who would buy a pre-built system at all? Setup time for building your own is slightly less than an hour.

      --
      Browsing with classic discussion, noscript, at -1 and nested
      no hidden comments and I only mod UP
    2. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by Idealius · · Score: 1

      For a tech on a lucky day.

    3. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by Cromac · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Who would buy a pre-built system at all? Setup time for building your own is slightly less than an hour.

      Setup time might be less than an hour for you but not for the mass market that can't stop the clock from blinking on their VCR. Do you really think the average Tivo owner can build their own DVR, especially using Linux, in less than an hour? Not a chance.

    4. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

      "who in their right mind would buy a restrictive system like Viiv when free-as-in-speech OpenMedia systems are available"

      ya, okay, and by that logic, who in their right mind would buy a system like Windows when free-as-in-speech systems like Linux are available.

      the answer, as we all know, is...

      EVERYONE

      -d

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    5. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by generic-man · · Score: 1

      When I want to watch TV, I want to sit on the couch, turn my brain down to 1, and absorb some visuals for a while. I don't want to debug Linux software and download sketchy drivers for otherwise decent hardware -- not for free, anyway. If someone were to sell a MythTV box and support it as TiVo does with their boxes, I'd buy one.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    6. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by richlv · · Score: 2, Informative

      i understand that the site is down now, but um... did you read the intro at least ?
      the part that says :
      "home media pc. It's DVB-T and HDTV capable, network ready (streaming, control, sharing). Has all the standard PVR features (real time pause, scheduling, listings etc). Plus you own the hardware, get support and get updates/maintenance."

      --
      Rich
    7. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      FUDdite
      Viiv is not crippled. True it supports DRM, but it does not force it. The application layer decides on the DRM. There is no reason you could not optimize linux and MythTV to run on this platform.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    8. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by shotfeel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course, the challenge is explaining to consumers why Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) [eff.org] is against their interests,

      That's actually very easy. You start with something they're familiar with:

      "Don't you hate it when you have to sit through all that crap at the beginning of a DVD before you can watch the movie?" "That's digital rights management at work!"

      Then you can explain how DVD player manufacturers are forced to sign an agreement stating that their players will allow Hollywood executives and lawyers to determine what you can and can't do in your living room. Anyone who makes a DVD player that circumvents Hollywood's protections, or otherwise helps you to do what would otherwise be perfectly legal, will run afoul of the DMCA.

      Then you can move on to other things like the broadcast flag that will be used to determine wether or not you even get to record a show to watch later, or the restrictions on newer HD DVD players that will determine for you wether you get to watch the movie you bought at its full resolution on the expensive TV you bought.

      In short, DRM allows movie and music producers to dictate what you can and can't do with stuff you pay for. Its not about preventing piracy (that's the herring that sells) its about controlling what the consumer can do after the sale.

    9. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I did read the intro. It contained a link to openmedia.co.nz. I'm not in New Zealand, so this product isn't for me. A DVB-T tuner doesn't help me as an American.

      My sentence should have read: "If someone were to sell a MythTV box to American audiences ... I'd buy one."

      --
      For more information, click here.
    10. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by wheany · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bullshit.

      I consider myself a professional computer user. I know Windows and its quirks pretty well. I couldn't get Mythtv working from scratch even after a month. I tried Knoppmyth, but at least them it didn't have new enough kernel to support my DVB card, and when I tried to compile a new kernel, everything broke horribly. Finally I succeeded with Mythdora.

      Mythdora has been updated at least twice after I got my box running. I have been too afraid to try and update my box, because even if DVB subtitles don't currenlty work, I prefer that to not having Mythtv at all.

    11. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by FragHARD · · Score: 1

      >>Setup time might be less than an hour for you but not for the mass market that can't stop the clock from blinking on their VCR.<<

      That was easy.. all I have to do is unplug it from the power outlet when I am not using it, and as a bonus it saves power that way!

      --
      FragHARD or don't frag at all
    12. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by openmedia_nz · · Score: 1

      Using tools like knoppmyth you can build a MythTV environment quickly if you know Linux really well. Some of our first customers are regular Linux users who would love a working MythTV box but don't have the time. We can deliver them a fully working solution. The tuners are pre tuned, the remote control works, we have patche management included. Plus it is a sexy looking case (personally).

      --
      OpenMedia Limited - Home of NZ's first OpenSource PVR http://www.openmedia.co.nz
    13. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by clydemaxwell · · Score: 1

      I wasn't saying 'there's no market for this' only 'why are we self-proclaimed geeks talking about it'
      Certainly YOU aren't claiming to be a twelve-o'clock flasher, are you? Consider the intended audience!

      --
      Browsing with classic discussion, noscript, at -1 and nested
      no hidden comments and I only mod UP
    14. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by clydemaxwell · · Score: 1

      Your personal problems likely stem from trying an intermediate-to-advanced project on an operating system I assume you have little experience in, rather than inherent flaws in my argument that it is easy to do.
      When I said easy, I was speaking to what I would deem the 'average' slashdotter, who is a relatively linux-experienced, microsoft-bashing comment whore. With these qualifications under his belt, he may go on to build a MythTV PVR in under an hour.
      I give you kudos for starting your comment by calling yourself a user, and following that with a remark about your windows experience. You, sir, truly fear no flames.

      --
      Browsing with classic discussion, noscript, at -1 and nested
      no hidden comments and I only mod UP
    15. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by Chuq · · Score: 1

      ya, okay, and by that logic, who in their right mind would buy a system like Windows when free-as-in-speech systems like Linux are available.

      A few differences:

      1. Windows isn't entrenched in the PVR market like they are with desktops.

      2. People don't have a lot of existing Windows based apps that they want to run on their PVR.

      3. People don't buy 3rd party peripherals for their PVR that may or may not work under different OSes.

      --
      - Chuq
    16. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      You asked who would buy it. Clearly then anyone who isn't you average slashdotter would then be a candidate to buy.

      Last I heard there were still a few of them around.

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    17. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by astralbat · · Score: 1

      If Viiv becomes successful, then it's only encouraging vendor support for DRM. Then it's only a matter of time before it's enforced by trusted computing.

    18. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by Snard · · Score: 1

      Then you can explain how DVD player manufacturers are forced to sign an agreement stating that their players will allow Hollywood executives and lawyers to determine what you can and can't do in your living room. Anyone who makes a DVD player that circumvents Hollywood's protections, or otherwise helps you to do what would otherwise be perfectly legal, will run afoul of the DMCA.

      How do these DRM-related agreements relate to DVD players that can upconvert, or can play DivX files? Wouldn't Hollywood execs consider the ability of a DVD player to show a movie in DivX format that was ripped from a DVD to be "circumventing the protections" of the original DVD?

      --
      - Mike
    19. Re:Bye, bye DRM-crippled Intel Viiv by homebrewmike · · Score: 1

      > Who would buy a pre-built system at all? Setup time for building your
      > own is slightly less than an hour.

      I could build one, it wouldn't be that hard. All my machines are machines that I've built by hand.

      The thing is - I have a family, a lawn to mow, house to take care of. Moreover, there are some really damn good beers to drink. All of these things take time.

      Now, it was neat building my first machine. And the second. And the 6th was ok. Really, after the nth, it's all about making sure things match. I'm at the point in my life when I want some other eager monkey to build it for me. Heck, they can probably even do it cheaper than I could.

      So, don't get on your high horse, Mr "ooh, I built a machine and now I think I know what I'm doing and now I can look down on everyone else." Some folks want to build one, others are happy to have 'em built for 'em. Don't question it - profit from it. Just don't get greedy, and you'll have a nice business on your hand.

  16. mythtv is still alittle too arcane.... by nblender · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I have a mythbackend and 2 frontends. I'm building a new backend for my DVB card. Ignoring installation issues and everything, if a pre-built box were to just show up, it would still be a little too arcane for the general public to use. I see my parents as "general public". My dad has a laptop and knows how to use various MS productivity things... The myth recording profiles, and schedules, and so forth, are poorly designed so an average run of the mill person has no idea what any of it means. MythTV is still a product by geeks for geeks. For example,

    In the mythweb page "recorded_programs", how is a non-geek supposed to know what "has commflag: Yes" means? "has cutlist: No". How bout "recgroup"?

    Don't get me wrong. I mythtv. In fact, I never watch livetv anymore and don't think I've seen a commercial in over a year. My wife has an xbox on 'her TV' as a mythfrontend to the backend. It's relatively wife-friendly. But it's not ready for the 'out of the box' market yet.

    1. Re:mythtv is still alittle too arcane.... by the_crowbar · · Score: 1

      How are you running an xbox as a MythTV frontend? I have an xbox modded with an upgraded HD. After doing a little searching there appears to be a build of MPlayer (that has support for the .nuv files from MythTV) compiled for native running on the xbox. I have looked at xbox-linux.org and I did not see an installer I could add as a menu item to my EvoX dashboard.

      Thanks,
      the_crowbar

      --
      Have you read the Moderator Guidelines
    2. Re:mythtv is still alittle too arcane.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Just install Xebian then use apt-get to install MythTV. I've been doing this for well over a year and it works fine.

      Xbox-linux.org has info. They even have an image you can just download and chuck on your E:.

    3. Re:mythtv is still alittle too arcane.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      if a pre-built box were to just show up, it would still be a little too arcane for the general public to use. I see my parents as "general public"... But it's not ready for the 'out of the box' market yet.

      I disagree. I know plenty of people who are tech-savvy enough and willing to learn their way around somewhat arcane configuration options, but not able or not willing to install their own MythTV system from scratch.

      There is a part of the "market" that can and will build their own, and a part of the market that won't put up with anything that isn't dead simple, but there's a big segment in between, too. Including many fairly hardcore geeks who simply don't want to take the time to screw with it.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:mythtv is still alittle too arcane.... by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Just install Xebian then use apt-get to install MythTV.

      It's sentences like that which keep Linux in general, and MythTV in particular, relegated to geek obscurity. ;-)

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:mythtv is still alittle too arcane.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardly in this situation though. The poster he is replying to has a "modded" xbox meaning he has hardware and/or software know-how. He knows how to search the net and at least understands about sometimes having to compile software. So in this case I disagree.

      The first hit for Xebian is an extremely detailed howto http://www.xbox-linux.org/wiki/Xebian_HOWTO

      Your pretty much spot on about Linux being for geeks, but at least in this case that was an appropriate response to someone who had a question about Linux.

    6. Re:mythtv is still alittle too arcane.... by soapee01 · · Score: 1

      The better way would be to run XBMC (XBox Media Center), and xbmcmythtv. It's not perfect yet, but it's definately getting there. It requires a modded xbox (which you have), and doesn't require installing/booting linux, so it's quicker. It's a bit tricky to get ahold of the programs, since the source is distributable, but the binaries are not (MS won't sign them [hence mod required], and the xbox SDK forbids the distribution of non-signed binaries). They can be found with some digging.

      Here's some links that might help you out:

      http://waltercedric.com/Mambo/index.php?option=com _content&task=view&id=58&Itemid=40
      http://forums.designtechnica.com/archive/index.php /t-4278.html
      http://www.xboxmediaplayer.de/cgi-bin/forums/ikonb oard.pl?act=ST;f=8;t=5934
      http://hardware.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/07 /01/0353218&from=rss
      http://www.dealdatabase.com/forum/archive/index.ph p/t-40168.html
      http://www.xbins.org/

    7. Re:mythtv is still alittle too arcane.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As another poster mentioned, the guy I replied to has a modified XBox, knows what .nuv files are, and seems to have some MythTV experience.

      I gave him a link to a detailed HOWTO, and mentioned that there is a Xebian image that he can download.

      It is a fairly complex process to get Xebian up-and-running, but no moreso than most other XBox-hacking tasks. If you can manage to configure EvoX and have Linux experience, then installing Xebian from the supplied image should be no big deal.

      The better option would be for a native port of the MythTV frontend so that there is no need for the Xebian overhead, but that hasn't been done, so this is the next-easiest option.

    8. Re:mythtv is still alittle too arcane.... by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1
      Just install Xebian then use apt-get to install MythTV.

      What's a Xesbian? And where on the Start menu is apt-git?

      -The General Public
      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    9. Re:mythtv is still alittle too arcane.... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      "Just install Xebian then use apt-get to install MythTV"

      It's sentences like that which keep Linux in general, and MythTV in particular, relegated to geek obscurity

      Two parts wishful thinking and one part loving the look of your own posts, in my humble opinion.

      Tried google?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    10. Re:mythtv is still alittle too arcane.... by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I love the irony of someone who actually believes that anyone outside of linux geekdom can possibly understand that sentence accusing ME of wishful thinking. Bravo, sir! The delusion is strong in this one.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    11. Re:mythtv is still alittle too arcane.... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I love the irony of someone who actually believes that anyone outside of linux geekdom can possibly understand that sentence accusing ME of wishful thinking.

      I hope you're not planning to be a journalist when you grow up because your phrase structure is completely undecipherable, never mind your pompous vacuousness.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  17. MythTV is not ready for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, I have been using MythTV for a couple of years now and it works pretty good but it's still really buggy. It's a college project and the inexperience shows (just look at the code if you don't believe me). It crashes or hangs every once in a while and it's really slow considering what it does.

    Plus there are no commercial data (schedule) services available. Currently most of use use the Zap2it data labs thing but that is only for non-commercial uses.

  18. Would need a lot of work by Brix+Braxton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As much as I love homebrew PVR's (I use several along with my Tivo) I can't help but think that for most people - the better value would be to just buy a Tivo and a lifetime subscription (and if they no longer offer that, then three years of service). If you want to copy MPEG files over, use Tivo to Go or get a ReplayTV. PC's are sloppy compared to these options.

    --
    www.wildpad.com
    1. Re:Would need a lot of work by pocketstheclown · · Score: 0

      I agree, this is Geek which I find pretty cool, hehe. But most of the general public have other priorities than to mess with a this. My non-Geek friends see the computer and DVR nothing more than an appliance that one can purchase, having a warranty, support, all that warm-fuzzy stuff etc...

    2. Re:Would need a lot of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for the rest of the world? Tivo is not an option for us in (World-US)

    3. Re:Would need a lot of work by Brix+Braxton · · Score: 1

      I don't really know but any STB is probably easier for the mainstream than a homebrew PVR - if there aren't Tivo or Replay like STB's in your area then this would obviously be the next best thing. I just know that I've set these up for people and the support they request after the fact is just a nightmare.

      --
      www.wildpad.com
    4. Re:Would need a lot of work by Ben174 · · Score: 1

      Except that Tivo doesn't currently support HDTV or digital (5.1) audio.

      --
      Here is my home page.
    5. Re:Would need a lot of work by b0bby · · Score: 1

      For $5/month, I can't see changing my DirectTivo. I don't watch much TV, so even though I have a pc hooked up in the living room, buying a tv card & installing Myth seems like too much effort. I just slapped a larger drive in the DirectTivo & it does everything I want. It's funny, my kids aren't going to remember a time where tv couldn't be paused!

    6. Re:Would need a lot of work by openmedia_nz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd love a Tivo but you can't get Tivo in New Zealand. The only alternative is the proprietary mySky product from Sky TV New Zealand. This has far less features, and total vendor lockin. Also with mySky you never own the product, yout just pay NZ$600 for the right to lease it. With myPVR you own the HW from day one. If you continue with your support contract we will provide patches, fixes and upgrade advise.

      --
      OpenMedia Limited - Home of NZ's first OpenSource PVR http://www.openmedia.co.nz
    7. Re:Would need a lot of work by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Tivo would be a better option for many people, but it's no available in NZ or any many other countries. And there are other benefits to MythTV - Tivo can't import videos or music, right?

    8. Re:Would need a lot of work by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      I live in NZ, ergo am a potential customer. However I'm obviously a bit ignorant. Could you possibly explain what the difference/benefit is of your product over something like the NZD$700 HDD recorder sold by DSE? Is it that it's built on FOSS, or that the DSE hardware is DRMed somehow, that your product has a better or more intuitive GUI, or what? From looking at the specs of the two products, I get the impression that the main advantages of your one seem to be (1) bigger HDD (2) dual layer DVD writer (3) more customisation (4) option for dual tuners. Am I missing something? FWIW, I think just the customisation by itself is a big draw.

    9. Re:Would need a lot of work by openmedia_nz · · Score: 1

      Ok as a starting point how many of the following does the HDD Recorder have
      1. Intelligent program guide
      2. Networking
      3. Streaming
      4. Music Plugin
      5. Gallery Plugin
      6. Transcoding
      7. Upgradable HD
      8. Upgradable to Digital services
      9. Can act as home network server

      If you take a look at the features page on the website you will notice a lot of differences compared with a basic DVD/HD unit. It also has considerably more features than units like mySky.

      --
      OpenMedia Limited - Home of NZ's first OpenSource PVR http://www.openmedia.co.nz
    10. Re:Would need a lot of work by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      Cool, thanks for that. Like I said I'm obviously a bit ignorant! I've never used MythTV before.

  19. They must be good by Junta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've only gotten my HD mythtv setup to 'crazy', acheiving 'mad crazy' is a huge step in the right direction.

    Seriously though, not that hard. I have a box that does ATSC and mythtv and displays via DVI to HDMI cable to my TV. (AirStar HD5000 tuner, onboard GeFore 6150 for DVI video). It could do unencrypted QAM channels if I wasn't too much a cheapskate to buy cable.

    I would be impressed if they had something that took CableCard or something for encrypted QAM channels on cable.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:They must be good by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

      It could do unencrypted QAM channels if I wasn't too much a cheapskate to buy cable.

      Even if you weren't a cheapskate, don't even bother. There are almost no unencrypted QAM channels on cable. On my cable system (Cox) the only unencrypted channel is one the local WeatherChannel Weather Scan channel thing. A homemade DVR, be it MCE or MythTV, is really pointless from HDTV perspective except for OTA, and what's on that? The FCC has really screwed us over here.

      If somebody has any way to get DVR functionality for HDTV over cable without having to use the cable companies box, please do tell. I hate my damn Cox DVR. It's slow, buggy and difficult to use. What would be really nice is a CableCard capable tuner for a PC. Good luck on ever seeing one of those though.

  20. Re:Trully by mzwaterski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Few markets advertise cable card support, but they are actually available widespread. We are fast approaching the deadline requiring companies to provide cablecard support (if we haven't hit that deadline already).

  21. Re:Trully by nagora · · Score: 4, Insightful
    While it might say it supports DVB-T , without full native support for digital cable, any kind of DIY PVR or MCE PC is just a gimmick.

    Speaking as someone who receives all his television via DVB-T in the UK, I can say that I have zero interest in digital cable.

    Looking through an interactive guide for up to a weeks worth of programming and then picking and choosing the content I want recorded, and then forgetting about it.

    Well, I suppose I could ask my MythTV box to cut back to only one week's programming but otherwise, that's what I do.

    will hold of on wasting any money on concepts like MythTV

    My copy of MythTV was free. Sounds like you've been ripped-off.

    The Myth is that is can record television,

    I appear to have 198GB of mythology on my hard drive, then!

    which means that analogue PVR's like this won't work, period.

    DVB-T is digital.

    Until I can sit back and fire up a PC that displays the same interactive guide data I am currently getting in a proprietary cable box, I don't think these things will find any success.

    Good news! You already can!

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  22. Re:Trully by barawn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    where the only way you can record digital cable or HDTV is to connect the cable box to your video in, and hit play and record on two remotes.

    Uh, you do realize that it's not only possible, but rather easy, to set up MythTV to work with cable boxes?

    Hit play and record on two remotes? What is this, 1980?

  23. You can get a dual tuner version too by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The site seems to be slashdotted for some reason :-0, but I managed to grab this bit:

    Additional Dual Tuner Model Now Available

    Wednesday, 19 April 2006

    Due to customer demand an additional standard configuration of myPVR has been released.

    It appears by far that customers want their "Personal Video Recorders" to have dual tuners. Hence we are please to announce the availability of an additional dual tuner model with the smaller 250GB Hard Drive.

    For the average user this HTPC can handle between 100 and 300 hours of TV, dependant on capture quality and the use of myPVR to store other media such as Music, Games and Images.

    You will be pleased to know that our current Limited Period special offers sill apply with this new model.

    Last Updated ( Wednesday, 19 April 2006 )

    Pricing Information Now Online Monday, 10 April 2006 We are very pleased to announce the initial pricing for our standard versions of myPVR 1.0. For a Limited Period we are offering the following special deal -

    Software support extended from 3 to 6 months

    Free delivery within New Zealand

    Onsite install within the Auckland area

    Note some conditions apply

    This innovative HTPC (Home Theater PC) solution, with all of the features you would expect from a PVR, is now available for the New Zealand consumer.

    Last Updated ( Wednesday, 19 April 2006 )

    --
    Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
  24. Mod -1 ... by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

    for making me giggle at work. :-)

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  25. Re:Trully by FireFury03 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Speaking as someone who receives all his television via DVB-T in the UK, I can say that I have zero interest in digital cable.

    I think a more significant problem is DVB-S support. Speaking as someone who uses Myth with Sky by having an S-video connection between the sky decoder and the Myth box, I would far prefer to just stick a DVB-S card in my Myth system. There are currently 3 problems here:

    1. Sky encrypt their channels using VideoGuard and won't produce a CAM to decrypt it. This ties you into using an official Sky branded decoder (which are also completely useless for picking up stuff not covered by Sky). There are 3rd party CAMs available which claim to decrypt VideoGuard but they are relatively expensive (~100ukp) and I suspect the EUCD renders them illegal. I've yet to find a SoftCAM that will work under Linux.

    2. DVB-S cards with a common interface are still reasonably pricey compared with DVB-T cards and DVB-S cards which don't have a common interface. This is probably down to lack of demand caused by (1).

    3. To record multiple programs at the same time would involve having multiple CAMs and multiple Sky subscriptions. Ideally what would be better is to either do the decoding on playback (like Sky+ does), or (better) do the decoding in a post-processing job much like the commflag and transcoding jobs.

    which means that analogue PVR's like this won't work, period.

    Well I'm not sure what the GP is smoking here, as you pointed out the PVR being discussed in the article is DVB-T (i.e. digital), however I use my MythTV box with a plain BT878 card in it to record the analogue S-video signal off my Sky box and it works just fine.

    Until I can sit back and fire up a PC that displays the same interactive guide data I am currently getting in a proprietary cable box, I don't think these things will find any success.

    Infact, I get _better_ guide data through my Myth box than I do through my Sky box. The Sky box gives me a week's worth with often very short descriptions, whereas the Myth box gives me 2 week's worth of listings (pulled from radio times). Additionally, having looked at the Sky+ feature set I'd say my Myth box is a hell of a lot more capable (especially when I hear my sky+ owning friends complain that they missed the first episode of the new series of $foo because sky+ doesn't automatically record it, whilest my Myth box noticed the new series had started and automatically scheduled in the recordings).

  26. OSS - service -profit by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

    Let's be honest here....
    MythTV was written by geeks, for geeks, I don't think that there's a lot of debate on that issue.
    If a company want's to make & sell a MythTV box and can turn a profit doing it - so much the better, but either way, the MythTV geeks will keep working on the project. [note that it would be nice if some of the profit was forwarded as a donation to the team.]
    What they are turning a profit on is not the MythTV software or the hardware. People are going to be paying for the convienence of not having to put it together for themselves. Check out companies that are selling HylaFax fax-servers. There are companies selling Athalon 1800 PC's w/ 4 fax lines & charging $1500 for them. Thats about $400(assuming they arn't using salvaged parts or a high end 4 line modem cards) for the PC & $1100 for configuing it. Not bad money for a job that took me about 4 hours to do the first time(stupid ISA jumpered modems).

  27. If it's not Insanely Great, I don't want it... by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    ...because I want to be like Gandhi and Edison and Amelia Earhart and Jim Henson and Frank Lloyd Wright.

    1. Re:If it's not Insanely Great, I don't want it... by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      think different!

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
  28. Re:Trully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because your country is back in the stone age with this kind of stuff, it doesn't mean that everybody else is.

    In Europe, subscription services use the DVB standard encryption system, with the access control provided by third-party plug in modules known as CAMs. You buy a CAM off your pay TV provider, chuck it into your satellite / cable box, put the smartcard into it, and it'll work. The system was designed to allow you to use any set top box with any pay TV service, so the standard was part of DVB from the beginning. You can get DVB-S and DVB-C cards that have CAM slots, so it's possible to record subscription TV in Europe.

    Basically, this is similar to the US CableCard, except it existed 12 years ago and is supported almost universally.

    The UK and Australia don't use it though. As in the US, providers supply their own boxes, which have hard-wired CAMs using an access control system that you can't get (legal) CAMs for. Since both countries have one provider with a total monopoly over pay TV, that's not going to change.

  29. Re:Trully by da'+WINS+pimp · · Score: 1

    Yea, cable card is there and it is a good thing, but try finding a videocard that accepts a cable card. Here's a hint - they don't exist. And if anyone knows different please let me know.

    The only reason I pay for a POS SA8300HD is the ability to record two shows at once on either digital or regular cable. I say POS because on a good day when the wind is blowing in the right direction, the cable gods are feeling good, and the onboard software decides to actually work, I can get all the shows I schedule for recording. It never fails that something I really want to see gets screwed by my 8300 because the interface software is crap. I've been paying to beta test this thing for 4 years because there is no other option thsat works with digital cable. I'm really counting on Tivo's new series 3, which has two cable card slots. I just hope I can aford it.

    --

    "I'm just here to regulate funkyness." - James Gandolfini, as Winston in The Mexican
  30. Myth Project by u16084 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe this was making its round couple weeks ago, so skip the crying over dupes..


    Pluto - Combines Security, Home Automation, Telecom (and other things) into a single package. Uses bluetooth roaming to follow your audio around your house.. OpenSource, and it also utilizes Myth. I thought Its a neat project.

    Link - http://plutohome.com/

    --
    -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
  31. Who needs cable? by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
    "They are glorified VCR's where the only way you can record digital cable or HDTV is to connect the cable box to your video in, and hit play and record on two remotes."

    What planet are you from? In my area there are 8 broadcast stations and many of them are just starting to figure out what subchannels are. The result? 13 distinct programs available at most times of the day - with nothing but some old rabbit ears. That's with the TV. My HD2000 card in the PC is happy to record any of it in nice digital (ATSC) format, but the reciever needs a better antenna than the TV in the other room. That's OK because the house is equiped with an attic antenna from the good old days - it's plugged into the PC. Most the stuff on TV is crap (cable included), so your insistance on paying for cable, and then paying more for digital, and more yet for HD is just beyond me.

    If everyone would drop cable, some networks will pick up the few good shows that are currently only on cable. The slots are now available thanks to the subchannels of ATSC.

    1. Re:Who needs cable? by arazor · · Score: 1

      Subchannels = the death of HDTV. That is you like your HDTV all full of macroblocking everything there is a scene change. But that is beside the point I think over the air HDTV is going to fade away as more and more stations run more programs on subchannels. Eventualy I think HDTV from the broadcast networks will end up being a premium service on cable/FIOS and satellite systems ( I dont really consider satellite a true HDTV source especialy directv which transcodes all 1920x1080i to 1280x1080 and reduces the bitrate signicantly so that it is just DVD or slightly better then DVD). The stations will run a direct link of the full HDTV feed to the cable/FIOS etc and probably just send a 16x9 720x480p of the network programming over the air with the crap subchannels like weather and informercials.

      Here is the website with DirecTV bit rates for HD http://www.widemovies.com/dfwbitrate.html
      I cant seem to find the similiar page for DishNetwork bitrates at the moment

  32. does linus get anything from redhat? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    ...does linus get anything from redhat?...

    A boner?

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  33. PVR? you mean PBR right? by seabasstin · · Score: 1

    Man I thought this was about 2 for $3 PBR's, now you are telling me its about the teli?

    --
    Content + Container; Content = Container; Content â Container... which is the question?
  34. TV OUT limitations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using MythTV for about 6 months now and it has completely changed my relationship to TV. I've been able to implement every single feature I want in a PVR (multi-tuner, export to DVD/VCD, cable box control, etc.) However, the one thing that is still lacking is the TV output. I haven't moved to HD yet so I'm using S-video TV output from my video card. The quality is certainly passable, but it is nowhere near the quality coming out of my cable box. Until the capability exists to get the same quality picture (or at least close) out of MythTV or any other roll-your-own PVR, people will be unsatisfied with it. I'm curious to see the quality of the picture coming out of these boxes. Unfortunately, their site seems a bit Slashdotted right now.

    1. Re:TV OUT limitations by HamHands · · Score: 1

      Are there any MythTV users out there who have achieved satisfactory picture quality for non-HD setups?

    2. Re:TV OUT limitations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have. I'm using a Happauge 150, and with DirectTV, I use the SVideo out. The RCA picture wasn't bad, but I would have to split the signal to work with my setup.

      The video out comes from a PNY Nvidia 5200. The picture quality is great at 720x480.

    3. Re:TV OUT limitations by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      Sure, my tv out is done with an nVidia 5200FX card. Cheap, and I can run at 1024x768. No problems on my 42" TV. The only issue is that I run s-video, not composite, and widescreen isn't well supported (4x3 formats only). But its acceptable (given that I don't have access to HD material, SD 4x3 material only).

      Ratboy

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    4. Re:TV OUT limitations by jmusits · · Score: 1

      Yeah most definately. I am running a Hauppague PVR-350 and use the composite out on the back of the card to run to my TV (my TV does'nt support S-Video). The quality is the same as that of the cable direct to the TV.

      Jason

      --
      -- 42 --
  35. Nope, it's too true to be good by wealthychef · · Score: 1

    The problem with solutions that are not integrated into the cable/satellite box with current technology is that they have to use IR (infrared) controller to change channels. This misses sometimes, making you miss some of your shows. For this reason, I would rather have an inferior interface with a higher reliability, integrated into the unit. This is why I use DirecTV, because they integrate TiVo into their box, and it's like $5/month for the service. It's worth it for the fact that I never miss a scheduled show.

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
    1. Re:Nope, it's too true to be good by HamHands · · Score: 2, Informative

      My MythTV box changes channels on my cable box using the same serial connection that TiVo uses. It works perfectly every time. If your serial connection isn't enabled, call your cable provider and tell them you've got a TiVo.

    2. Re:Nope, it's too true to be good by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's news! Last I checked, the serial port on my cable box did nothing, and TiVo was not able to access it. But if I can drive it via a reliable external mechanism, I'd love to use an open, flexible computer-based solution to program my TV.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
  36. ell oh ell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plus you own the hardware, get support and get updates/maintenance. Is it too good to be true?

    ** Heh. Just like you would if you did it all yourself...oh...wait....are you saying that the open source community isn't good enough "support"?

  37. That's all well and good but... by sterno · · Score: 1

    Yeah okay so then they understand why DRM is annoying. But does it change their habbits in any way? Do they stop buying DVD's? Do they stop buying videos through ITunes? In the end, the media companies will continue to push DRM so long as it's incorporation doesn't adversely affect sales. Unless people connect the dots from DRM to actually doing something that harms the sales of the media companies, it doesn't matter if you convince them DRM sucks.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:That's all well and good but... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You could tell them that their shiny new Viiv system won't be able to record most of the shows they want to time-shift because of its DRM and the no-record flag on broadcasts. Even worse, you could tell them that their expensive new Viiv system will force them to watch the commercials because of its DRM.

      These two points should open their eyes quickly. After all, what's the point of buying Viiv if you can't even use it like TiVo?

  38. And they fly too! by kkovach · · Score: 1

    What's with the wings on those things. :-)

    --
    The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
  39. Re:Trully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DVB-T... Bleh. Don't care.

    If MythTV supported DVB-S (and softcams) then there would be hundreds of thousands of new MythTV installs in North America like instantly! (DishNetwork/Expressvu anyone?). I know lots of people that would buy a new PC for it overnight if it worked (me included).

    Until it does (and I'm not waiting), then I'll stick to something else that works (MyTheater/ProgDVB/DVB Dream, etc) and does digital capturing, which is ridiculously better than analog capturing (like using a Hauppauge card). The difference is so huge - like the difference between VHS and DVD (and the DVB card can also capture HD streams, usually 720p @ 13mbit here)

    That, and my satellite PVR that also does digital capturing of the transportstream (again, bit for bit, 100% quality recording, 704x480 @ 3mbit, with AC3 5.1 if present - just like using DVB-S cards). And you can rip shows off of the HD too.

  40. What do people do in the UK? by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
    Out of interest, what do people on Slashdot do for PVR's in the UK?

    If you have Sky, it seems like you're locked into using Sky+ - which admitidally is rather nice and has possibily the next best UI to Tivo (but is still way ahead of everything else out there). However I don't want to pay £15/month for half the channels I want and then an extra £10/month for the subscription to the + service.

    For Freeview, you seem to be left with Humax, DigiFusion or Toppy - all of which are substantially lower quality, have a UI with many quirks and all three are lacking "season pass" functionality (hell, on the Humax you can't just select a program and say "record this timeslot every week", you have to set it up from a completely different location).

    Although I've not looked very hard, DIY Sky+ appears to be impossible and DIY Freeview appears to be a little on the hacky side.

    What do people do?

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:What do people do in the UK? by smoker2 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What do you mean by "DIY Freeview" ?

      If you want freeview going through a pc (the DIY part) then get a freeview pci card or usb box and plug it in. You can use Myth on Linux, or various solutions on Windows XP such MS Media centre, Media Portal, (I was going to add Meedio, but it seems they've been bought out by Yahoo), Snapstreams "Beyond TV".

      If you're on linux, then you could use the Hardware compatibility list at LinuxQuestions to help in choosing a card.

      There is a nice selection of DVB-T cards available at DVBSHOP in Germany, which I have used, and they are pretty good with quick orders. They also sell Common Interfaces for some of the DVB-T cards so you can add a TopUp TV CAM and smart card and get subscriber stuff.

      Ok, so you have to build the box yourself, but that's DIY for ya !

      If you can be bothered, here's a list of my media centre related bookmarks -

      Bookmarks

      media centre

      Overclockers UK SATA/RAID Overclockers UK Coolermaster Cases Overclockers UK Seagate Overclockers UK Hard Drive Accessories Enlight EN-8950 Server Case Black EN-8950 EYE-910 Full Tower 10 Bay Server Case - Gamecase.co.uk Mobile Rack-Backplane TheDigiboxShop.com Technotrend, Technisat DVB-S DVB-C and DVB-T cards at DVBSHOP.NET LinITX.com - Software - Mini ITX and computer components shop mini-itx.com - store LinITX.com - iMON Inside - Black Ceratech Wireless Keyboard, Built in trackball PSK573 at ITX Warehouse : Uk retailer of VIA Mini ITX form factor computers. £ $ Delivery World Wide Kustom PCs YOYOtech.co.uk suppliers of computer hardware, including, ready made pcs; laptops; motherboards; and all other pc related products. "LOWEST PRICES ON THE NET" www.mediaPC.tv / www.u-SM.com Media and Bespoke Computers Kustom PCs Cubid 2699 ITX Case Black mini-itx.com - store Microsoft Windows XP Media Centre Edition MCE2005 OEM XPMCE2005 at ITX Warehouse : Uk retailer of VIA Mini ITX form factor computers. £ $ Delivery World Wide
    2. Re:What do people do in the UK? by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      I built a little Freeview PVR year or two ago system using an Epia motherboard, Gentoo Linux, MythTV and a Hauppage Nova-T card. MythTV is a fantastic achievement but sadly is not in the "It Just Works" category. I dont see why a product like the NZ box - with carefully selected compatible hardware and all the driver headaches solved for you - shouldn't work though.

      Main deal breakers are (a)Slow and fragile channel changing in LiveTV (at least on my system) (b) No DVB Radio (c) No DVB Teletext and (d) No luser-friendly DVD recording.

      A friend has a Topfield and swears by it and claims that it passes the Significant Other test for usability. There are various third-party add-ins to improve the EPG functionality. You can also use a re-flashed Linksys NSLUG as an ethernet interface, Radio Times scraper and "season pass" system - but that is getting hacky again.

      There are plenty of PCI and USB DVB-T cards for windoze systems - This one seems to be one of the more featureful (and AFAIK works under linux).

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    3. Re:What do people do in the UK? by cleanthes · · Score: 1

      I'd dispute your claim that Toppys are 'substantially lower quality'(topfield PVR5800 in the UK: www.toppy.org.uk). This might be true for Humax and Digifusion.

      I've got one and it's fantastic. It is extensible with a C API for developing your own applications (TAPs) to improve the system in various ways. With these free, easily installed enhancements you get past the slightly 'quirky' (but not too bad) UI provided by Topfield. There is a strong community around the products and they are capable of being installed in a wireless network environment. Only downside is their lack of ability to _easily_ play DivX format, but you can get it to happen if you put some effort in. There are (free) TAPs which provide 'season pass' type functionality, it can download EPG data from the over-the-air broadcast or from Radio Times (etc.), you can get photo viewers, MP3 players, Tetris and Sudoko games and a lot more.

      It's dual tuner, can record two programs whilst playing a third, USB support, Digital Audio out and it's generally just great. £300 for a 250Gb dual tuner model is also a whole lot cheaper (and nicer to look at) than this MythTV-based solution.

      As far as a cheap, easy solution but one that is totally extensible and is very user-friendly (and wife friendly), I can't go far enough in recommending a Topfield.

  41. Pc Based PVR's Lack Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who has been researching "convergence" technologies, and building PC based PVR's in one form or another for easily six years. Have spent enough money in this pusuit on graphics cards alone, to buy a really nice automobile.

    The biggest thing that sucks about PC based PVR's, that can't be worked around, is connectivity. Even the best efforts at this will leave you with a pasta-fetival-hodge-podge of wires, cables, sensors, and various remotes. Ground loop filters must be added for clean audio (to and from IO). Then you have to screw around with all the various (possibly) uncooperative software components.

    The cabling alone costs more than a stand-alone DVD recorder w/harddrive. Even a simple forty dollar stand-alone DVD player comes with a matching remote, a full set of home entertainment system friendly input and output connections and switching capabilities.

    All this money and time I've spent has led me to the conclusion that in order for this kind of sytem to be generally viable. PC's will need better IO interfaces and switching capabilities on par with these stand-alone's. Or someone will need to figure out how to add the neccessary horse power and internal connectivity options to these Stand-Alones. USB/Firewire is helpful in this regard.
    On balance it looks to me that the second option would be best overall. However, the core components could not be cobbled together by an end user enthusiast. Some DVD recorder manufacturer would need to build a main board that would allow for upgrading the certain key components (CPU/PowerSupply etc..).

  42. Too good to be true by Vermyndax · · Score: 1

    Sigh... regarding the "is it too good to be true?" question... of course it is. The product is only available in New Zealand. I guess I'll try to find an orc or balrog to line one up for me.

  43. Exchange Rate by klenwell · · Score: 1

    The exchange rate appears to be about NZ$1.6 to US$1 [http://www.x-rates.com/d/NZD/USD/graph120.html%5D [x-rates.com] and according to the website the prices are listed in NZD.

    So if you're an American (like me! woo-hoo!), you can divide by 1.6.

    --
    Innovation makes enemies of all those who prospered under the old regime... -- Machiavelli
    1. Re:Exchange Rate by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      So if you're an American (like me! woo-hoo!), you can divide by 1.6.

      Given the current state of funding for schools in the U.S., I wouldn't be so sure about that.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:Exchange Rate by klenwell · · Score: 1

      hehe.

      That's why I use a calculator.

      --
      Innovation makes enemies of all those who prospered under the old regime... -- Machiavelli
  44. Tivo just works by rasper99 · · Score: 1

    I consider myself rather techie being a senior UNIX admin for a living but Tivo is just too easy. I have better things to do with my time. I also have a wife who doesn't have to ask questions about using Tivo. Occassionly she asks me to save a show to DVD which is outside her skill set.

    With Tivo to Go I can make DVDs of my favorite shows easily. I can even remove the commercials using Sonic MyDVD (that is designed to work with Tivo) from a one hour show by hand (accurately vs automated crap) in about 10 minutes.

    It's simple, it only crashes or screws up about once every six months and it just works.

  45. MythTV + Bittorrent by iamnotaclown · · Score: 2, Informative
    I, too, built a crazy-but-not-quite-mad-crazy mythTV box using Shuttle kit and a Hauppauge PVR 250. For a few months I happily scheduled recordings of my favourite shows.

    Until I discovered TvTorrents.com. Why bother going through all the trouble of recording, waiting for the backend to flag the commercials and transcode to Xvid when I can just subscribe to a RSS feed using Azureus and have the final product appear automatically (almost... you have to manually rescan for them to show up in the list of videos).

    In my opinion, this is the future of TV, whether the networks want it or not.

    1. Re:MythTV + Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes but then you run the risk of getting sued by "big Media" and having your life ruined because you downloaded the latest Sopranos. It's honestly not worth the risk. Right now I haven't heard of anyone being sued for downloading OTA network shows but even that may change.

      I know millions of people(mostly 21) could care less, but the risk is definitely there. Personally I'm not willing to take it.

    2. Re:MythTV + Bittorrent by iamnotaclown · · Score: 1
      Yes but then you run the risk of getting sued by "big Media"

      You're assuming I live in the US(DMC)A. I don't. Individuals don't get sued for alleged copyright infringement where I live. Even then, first they'd have to prove that watching a recording of something that was broadcast free-to-air isn't fair use.

    3. Re:MythTV + Bittorrent by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Big media can bring it on. I'd love to be a test case for copyright, the rights of individuals, the legality of the DMCA, and the obligation of copyright owners to make their works available in ways that don't date back to the middle of the last century.

  46. I want that case!! by Khan · · Score: 1

    Anybody know who makes the case? I already have a MythTV system based on KnoppMyth. I just need to "beautify" it :-)

    --

    "Klaatu, verada, necktie!" -Ash

    1. Re:I want that case!! by Mr.+BS · · Score: 1

      That case is the HTPC-100 case available from nMedia. They have other real nice models as well.

  47. A 15-year preorder? by tepples · · Score: 1

    If someone were to sell a MythTV box to American audiences ... I'd buy one.

    Are you willing to order 15 years in advance for the product to be shipped when TiVo's DVR patents run out?

    1. Re:A 15-year preorder? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Yes. TiVo's HDTV model won't be out before 2021 at the rate they've been going, anyway.

      (disclosure: I own stock in TiVo and wish they would get off their asses about HDTV already; HD boxes are pieces of crap now)

      --
      For more information, click here.
  48. Image constraint token by tepples · · Score: 1

    The application layer decides on the DRM. There is no reason you could not optimize linux and MythTV to run on this platform.

    Other than that your cable company or satellite company specifies that any application layer that receives its programming must conform to a given DRM spec, right? This will become more important as people begin to demand HDTV DVRs that work in high definition despite image constraints inserted by the publisher on analog outputs. (Many consumer HDTV formats include image constraints such that all analog outputs must be blurred to the equivalent of 540p.)

    1. Re:Image constraint token by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      You only proved my point. The application layer is the DRM, the chipset does not require it. The post I was replying to implied that the hardware was evil because it supported DRM. My point was that the hardware could care less whether it needs to run DRM, it's the app that decides that.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Image constraint token by tepples · · Score: 1

      My point was that the hardware could care less whether it needs to run DRM, it's the app that decides that.

      And mine was that an app that lacks support for DRM will lose in the marketplace to an app that works with MPAA-approved DRM because the majority of consumer entertainment device buyers in the United States prefer to be the MPAA's consumers.

  49. Get TiVo now, and wait... by podperson · · Score: 1

    Unless you just want to tinker with things, just get a TiVo and have something that works. Sure, it's closed, proprietary, evil capitalist pig dog BUT...

    If you use a TiVo for a year the component cost of a given custom PVR will drop by the amount you put into the TiVo. You can then decide to stick with TiVo or switch to a custom PVR. Lather, rinse, repeat.

  50. DVB? Doesn't appear to be... by daenris · · Score: 1

    I'm confused. The article summary says "DVB-T capable" which... okay, you could put a DVB card in it I'm sure.

    And then a lot of the comments on here are talking about it being a digital PVR and the DVB support. But if you look at the tech specs it says "Hauppauge MPEG2 video capture (single or dual tuner)", which I'm pretty sure means a PVR150 or PVR500 (and later realized I could've just looked at the sales page to figure that out). Then I looked at the features page and get:

    "Single or Dual analog tuner capturing at DVD quality." Which seems to back that up. Then they go and throw a wrench in it with:

    "Supports DVB-T (subject to availability)."
    "Can record off your existing Sky Decoder (optional additional feature)."

    So it appears that the digital is probably an option, rather than standard configuration.

    What I REALLY don't understand is how any of these MythTV preconfigured system companies are staying in business (if they are anyway...). Look at the price they're charging for a single analog tuner system. $1500NZD (~$950USD)

    For $950 you can (should) do way better than a single tuner.

  51. Re:Trully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Sky encrypt their channels using VideoGuard and won't produce a CAM to decrypt it. This ties you into using an official Sky branded decoder (which are also completely useless for picking up stuff not covered by Sky). There are 3rd party CAMs available which claim to decrypt VideoGuard but they are relatively expensive (~100ukp) and I suspect the EUCD renders them illegal. I've yet to find a SoftCAM that will work under Linux.

    Assuming the CAMs in questions are not sold or intended to be used with counterfeit subscriber cards or remove restrictions present in SKY's boxes, I am not aware of any provision of the copyright directive that would prevent you from buying, selling or using such CAMs. Am I missing anything?

  52. Re:Mod parent "Racist Honky" by s16le · · Score: 1

    nobody asked you, Blackie McBlackity.

  53. haha, yea they're available by tacokill · · Score: 1

    They are available. I have one. Now all I need is an capture card that can use a CableCard. And guess what? There aren't any.

    And that, my friend, is the bigger issue.


  54. How about TellyServer then ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.interact-tv.com/

    Better prices, no fees (yo!), upgradeable storage, add tuners, soon to support HDTV

  55. MythTV Unit for the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out MonolithMC if you are looking for a MythTV System in the USA. They currently have dual tuner models, but support IR Blasters, Serial and Firewire channel changing at a reasonable price! I'm looking into one for a 2nd mythtv box and the price is very reasonable. Maybe an HD solution will be around shortly too.

  56. Is it too good to be true? by GWBasic · · Score: 1
    I really want an HTPC that can do the following:
    • Fully support HD-DVD / Blu Ray via an external USB drive
    • HDTV DVR
    • Support for the new Viiv services
    • Everything works "out of the box" without any tinkering
    So far I haven't seen a HTPC that will do all of the above.
  57. Re:DVB? Doesn't appear to be... by openmedia_nz · · Score: 1

    First up the reason some of these features are optional is they haven't officially been launched in New Zealand at this stage. I'm using a DVB-T tuner on my test bed but I can only get 2 channels on it, instead of the 9 I can get on my usual analogue ariel.
    Secondly the only way to reduce price would be to reduce the feature set. The local component prices here in New Zealand are a lot hight than the US. Trade price here is often a lot more than US retail price. For the level of hardware included, plus for the supported install of MythTV we feel the prices are quite reasonable.
    As for digital only being an option, depends on your definition. The unit includes Composite, SVideo, VGA and DVI connectivity as standard, plus can play the majority of media found on the internet. Digital capture is optional because not everyone in NZ has Sky, and at present that is the only digital service.

    --
    OpenMedia Limited - Home of NZ's first OpenSource PVR http://www.openmedia.co.nz