Slashdot Mirror


First Look at Sony's Tiny Vaio UX180p

An anonymous reader writes "MobileTechReview has posted a first look at the Sony Vaio UX180P Micro PC and comparison of it with UMPC and OQO. "When I first heard about the Sony UX series, I nearly dismissed it because I just couldn't imagine that 1024 x 600 on a 4.5" screen could ever be readable. Yes, the price is certainly another issue-- consumers don't flock to spend twice as much on a "notebook" that's less than half the size of a standard ultralight. At least not in the SUV-lovin' US. Well, happily I was wrong. That tiny XBRITE display is easily readable, despite the number of pixels squeezed into close company""

178 comments

  1. nice typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean OQO right? QOQ doesnt sound quite as....eloquent ;)

    1. Re:nice typo by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I tagged the story "cock."

    2. Re:nice typo by 8ball629 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I, for one, welcome our new QOQ overlords.

    3. Re:nice typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you must have a small qoq, then.

      reminds me of a South Park episode...

    4. Re:nice typo by StikyPad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well it looks like the Micro PC blew the QOQ away.

      KG: N...no, that's, that'd be impossible. Your QOQ can support your whole weight?
      JB: Well not at first...
      KG: Yeah?
      JB: But over time.
      KG: Hmm...how many pushups can you do?
      JB: ...QOQ pushups?
      KG: Yeah...I guess, you could only do one really.
      JB: Yeah, well one is all ya need.

    5. Re:nice typo by Dahan · · Score: 1

      Good for you.

  2. Screen Resolution by PatTheGreat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    His number one and biggest complaint is screen resolution. How hard could it possibly be to turn it down a bit?

    --
    Google: "All your data are belong to us."
    1. Re:Screen Resolution by PatTheGreat · · Score: 1

      Er, her biggest complaint.

      --
      Google: "All your data are belong to us."
    2. Re:Screen Resolution by G-funk · · Score: 1

      New to this whole "LCD" thing huh?

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    3. Re:Screen Resolution by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Informative

      LCDs become fuzzy when set to a non-native resolution. Furthermore, most operating systems display things using a pixel-based rendering system as opposed to a "real-life" size, so the icons become either tiny or huge. Vista should have vector-based rendering so that everything is rendered at the "right" size regardless of the resolution of the display. I can't wait, because my laptop has a 1920x1200 15.4 display. Of course, it probably can't run Vista. Dang.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    4. Re:Screen Resolution by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting
      LCDs become fuzzy when set to a non-native resolution.
      Not inherently. By my calculation this screen has a dot pitch of 4.5/sqrt(800^2+600^2)*25 = 0.1125. A dot pitch of 0.11 mm is smaller than any CRT I've seen, so this LCD screen should scale a raster display better, not worse, than a CRT.
    5. Re:Screen Resolution by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't he just, you know, change the DPI to something closely resembling the actual DPI?

    6. Re:Screen Resolution by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Laser printers have 600 dpi. I don't see anyone complaining that it's too high. The problem is with the operating system and the software using bitmapped rendering elements instead of a vector based.

      This is a huge problem for the web right now too since web designers are still addicted to .gif and .jpg images for site layout and design.

    7. Re:Screen Resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and by the same logic, my 17" 1280x1024 LCD has a dot pitch of 0.26, which is comparable to my 17" CRT with a 0.24 dot pitch.

      But the LCD still looks infinitely worse than the CRT at non-native resolutions.

    8. Re:Screen Resolution by Gnavpot · · Score: 2, Informative
      "LCDs become fuzzy when set to a non-native resolution." Not inherently. By my calculation this screen has a dot pitch of 4.5/sqrt(800^2+600^2)*25 = 0.1125. A dot pitch of 0.11 mm is smaller than any CRT I've seen, so this LCD screen should scale a raster display better, not worse, than a CRT.
      On a CRT, you can never hit each dot precisely, so every resolution will appear fuzzy. CRT users are used to that fuzziness.

      LCD users running native resolution with a digital video feed are not used to such a thing, so the fuzziness that appears when running non native resolutions can feel quite disturbing, even if the dot pitch is equal to that of a typical CRT.
    9. Re:Screen Resolution by smithmc · · Score: 1


        Not inherently. By my calculation this screen has a dot pitch of 4.5/sqrt(800^2+600^2)*25 = 0.1125

      Actually, it's (4.5 * 25.4) / sqrt(1024^2 + 600^2) = 0.096 mm. Which, BTW, is over 263 dpi. With good antialiasing, text on this thing should be almost indistinguishable from print!

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    10. Re:Screen Resolution by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Inches aren't what's important either. An inch viewed a foot away is a lot diffferent than one viewed from three feet away.

      Optimum dpi is a function of viewing distance, and viewing distance of this device is typically much less than a desktop monitor.

    11. Re:Screen Resolution by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 0

      That is true, but one can also hold a business card or small photograph up to one's face and never ask the question of how much DPI it has. Why do we do it for a small computer screen? Once all screens have a certain "high enough" DPI, the only time one would worry about DPI is when one wants to have a very large poster sized screen (and wants to work on it up close in order to have more desktop space or whatever). Even photographers have to worry about DPI in these cases.

      When we work with real objects, we work with inches and millimeters, we don't work with pixels. We used to count bytes back when memory was expensive and computers did not have much of it, but we are moving away from that. I see the same thing happening with pixel counting too.

  3. Scaling of pictures and text by Toba82 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know that fonts sizes are easily adjusted in most web browsers, but what about images? Do any popular web browsers offer an option to scale all images a certain amount? Without this feature, the future of very small dot pitches on LCDs looks dim.

    --
    I pretend to know more than I really do by mooching off google and wikipedia.
    1. Re:Scaling of pictures and text by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 5, Informative

      Opera scales its images with font size changes.

      --
      Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
    2. Re:Scaling of pictures and text by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      I read that some version of Firefox will do pixel-doubling on screens over a certain DPI. I only read about it once though, and it was a few months ago so I've no idea if they added that feature yet.

    3. Re:Scaling of pictures and text by davidpack01 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Opera can scale an entire page, including images, to your liking.

    4. Re:Scaling of pictures and text by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Virtually any version of Opera and Internet Explorer 7 zoom both images and text (surprising since IE6 didn't zoom ANYTHING on most sites). I'm sure there are a few Firefox extensions out there that do the same.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    5. Re:Scaling of pictures and text by jone_stone · · Score: 1

      Firefox was, for a while, slated to have the ability to arbitrarily scale a whole web page but for some reason they pushed that feature back to version 3. By that time the issue may have been rendered moot by Vista (on Windows computers, that is). In theory the new Direct3d-based UI mill make it possible to scale the whole program -- a feature I've been yearning for for years, since I like to run my display at a really high resolution.

      <rant>As I see it there's no avoiding the eventual crossover to vector-based user interfaces. Resolutions will keep rising but people don't want to keep looking at those tiny little fonts and icons. High resolution displays are wonderful but the UI people need to realize that not everyone runs at the same DPI. I applaud Microsoft for breaking this new ground with their next version of Windows.</rant>

    6. Re:Scaling of pictures and text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off-by-one http://offbyone.com/offbyone/ will arbitrarily scale images. Nice little browser in a 1.2 MB package. Perfect for old or resource limited hardware.

    7. Re:Scaling of pictures and text by AnyoneEB · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Zoom Image extension has a similar option for FireFox, although I think Opera's works a bit better.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    8. Re:Scaling of pictures and text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Try openSUSE ( http://www.opensuse.org/ ) with XGL ( http://en.opensuse.org/Xgl ) enabled. I got it running within about 10 minutes following this howto ( http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/feature/17174. html ) on my HP dv8230ca laptop.

      I can scale entire apps, make them transparent, wobbly windows are cool and not to mention the cube...

    9. Re:Scaling of pictures and text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IE6 actually followed the standard better than the other browsers in this case. It only scales relatively sized fonts unless you go into the accessibility settings and tell it to ignore pages' font settings.

    10. Re:Scaling of pictures and text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Internet Explorer 7 has such an option as well (right smack in the status bar where you can't miss it). It's pretty much a required feature with the absurd resolutions many modern LCDs run at, unless one doesn't mind the horrible non-native resolution blurring.
       
      /Anonymous Coward hugs his CRT

    11. Re:Scaling of pictures and text by sandman_eh · · Score: 1

      Firefox can certyianly scale images. I have the following JS, snipped from somewhere or other in a bookmark, this allow me to scale any images on the current pages just by selecting the bookmark. javascript:factor=Math.sqrt(2); if(!window.scale) { scale=1; zW=[]; zH=[]; unitless=/^[0-9.]+$/; function r(N) { w=N.width; h=N.height; if (unitless.test(w)) zW.push([N,w]); if (unitless.test(h)) zH.push([N,h]); var C=N.childNodes,i; for (i=0;iC.length;++i) r(C[i]); } r(document.body); } scale*=factor; for(i in zW) zW[i][0].width=zW[i][1]*scale; for(i in zH) zH[i][0].height =zH[i][1]*scale; [].v

      --
      Master of Peng Shui.Ancient oriental art of Penguin Arranging)
  4. Sony still rulez by MdntToker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's up with all the Sony bashing lately?

    This just goes to show that the Consumer Electronics division still puts out great products!

    1. Re:Sony still rulez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Look up the legal term "goodwill." You lose a lot of it when you vandalize my computer with a rootkit.

      I own an early ancestor of this subnotebook, the original Crusoe PictureBook (I believe the model number is PCG-1VN). I love it. When it eventually dies, it's going to be very hard to resist the temptation to replace it with this new model from Sony.

      But you can bet your ass I will.

    2. Re:Sony still rulez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's up with all the Sony bashing lately?



      Try this:

      Get prompt in-warranty service. Get competent tech support. Get any service whatsoever outside warranty. Get updated drivers. Get the drivers necessary to install Vista even if the machine has a Vista-compatible sticker. Get a spare battery more than 18 months after model release. Get a screen with 34 dead pixels replaced.

    3. Re:Sony still rulez by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's a term from finance and economics, dipshit, not law.

    4. Re:Sony still rulez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, it shows up as valuable consideration in every contract I've ever signed. How about yours?

    5. Re:Sony still rulez by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, jackass, it's there right along with assets, receipts, and whatever else you may find on the balance sheet. Like I said, the term derives from finance.

    6. Re:Sony still rulez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey shit for brains, it is defined in Black's Law Dictionary, so it is a legal term, regardless of where it derives from.

    7. Re:Sony still rulez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is

      * xoxoxo *
      * xoxoxo *
      * xoxoxo *


      Latin for oink oink oink?

    8. Re:Sony still rulez by Sketch · · Score: 1

      I had a PCG-1VN and loved it too. It was always a bit lacking in CPU power, and sucked for video playback though. My previous employer bought it though, so I no longer have it. I occasionally think about buying one on ebay, but I think the previous-gen 400MHz PII's might actually be better, CPU-wise. Too bad they never came out with another non-Crusoe model before they stopped selling it.

      You might look into the Fujitsu P1000 for a replacement, too. I was looking at them, but decided to go smaller and got a Sharp Zaurus C3100 instead.

      --
      -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
    9. Re:Sony still rulez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the recommendation... yeah, the Crusoe is slow as hell and the advertised battery life advantage never really materialized, but I really like the notebook's overall feel. It helps to think of it as a grown-up PDA rather than a child-sized notebook PC. I will have a look at the P1000 when the time comes (which probably won't be long.)

  5. Neat! by the_humeister · · Score: 1

    It almost, but not quite, gives the PDA a run for the money. Although the PDA is still significantly less expensive. I like it though.

    1. Re:Neat! by buraianto · · Score: 1

      The only question that matters, though, is: Do you like it enough to buy it?

  6. Sure ... by lixee · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Nice and all, but does it run Linux.
    On a more serious note, I wonder if how many people out there already tried Ubuntu on it.

    --
    Res publica non dominetur
    1. Re:Sure ... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      If it dosn't now, I'm sure it will. It's an x86 based system so the only likely stumbling blocks are the oddball display device and perhaps the bootloader.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Sure ... by paxmaniac · · Score: 1

      Inevitably, it has been done. Although it seems not with total success (yet) - give it another week. http://mozy.org/vaio/

    3. Re:Sure ... by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      Your question makes me wonder...

      How long before we see a consumer product like this, supporting Linux from the beginning? I really need to replace my old and busted notebook, but is nearly impossible to find one, here at Brazil, that fully supports any flavor of Linux and even harder to find one that comes with Linux pre-installed!

      I don't have any use for Windows... why should I be forced to buy it when I get a new notebook?

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    4. Re:Sure ... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      I don't have any use for Windows... why should I be forced to buy it when I get a new notebook?

      Can't you still send in for a refund? Should be worth it for the satisfaction if not the money. Personally I kept my copy of windows in case I need it (and sometimes I do) but the space it takes up is annoying me.

    5. Re:Sure ... by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      No,

      Dell, HP, Lenovo... All of them refuse to refund a returned Windows copy. Mind you that this kind of pratice goes aggainst the brasilian law, they can't force me to buy something that I don't want... In theory I could take this to the court, but its not worth the effort.

      I would buy an Apple MacBook instead, but they cost almost 3x the price here at Brasil... A Dell is much cheper, because they have a assembly factory here and don't have to pay the abusive import taxes.

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    6. Re:Sure ... by Lbz8 · · Score: 1

      And why should any company be forced to sell you their hardware with LINUX installed? It works both ways.

      You want LINUX, use the instructions already all over the internet to install LINUX on the ux180p. You don't want Windows on a Laptop from a computer manufacturer who clearly tells you what you are getting for your money - no crime there - then find a company who has what you want or go out and build your own.

      It is so naive and childish for the fanboys here to criticize others who don't bow to their wishes and convenience. When there are enough of you to make focusing on some other OS sound practice buiness-wise, it will happen. But no one is forcing you to get or buy anything you don't want so wake up.

    7. Re:Sure ... by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      Fine,

      So sell me a notebook WITHOUT any OS pre-installed! Why should I be forced to pay for something I'll not use?

      My problem isn't install Linux on the notebook, that I know how to do... My problem is how can I buy a piece of hardware without having to buy a Windows Licence too!

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
  7. Too bad its made by sony by huguley · · Score: 5, Funny


    I wonder if it comes with the rootkit preinstalled?

    1. Re:Too bad its made by sony by Psycosys · · Score: 1

      No need for that. This thing is way too small for anyone to put a CD into it!

    2. Re:Too bad its made by sony by huguley · · Score: 1, Insightful


      The sad thing is before the rootkit I was a big fan of sony. One of thier cameras was the front runner in my search and a PS 3 was a thought. Now I bash sony every chance I get to anyone who will listen. It was thier choice to buy BMG and if they did not reign them in then they have to live with the consequences. Maybe if they had left the name as BMG rather than changing it to sony-BMG then not so many would have noticed it. They didn't they wanted to be associated with them and associated they are...

  8. Saw this at the Sony Building by Reapman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    in Tokyo, and I was very impressed... my x51v PDA is just a bit smaller overall then this and only runs WM5. However it's not something u can easily stick in your pocket so not sure when i'd use it... Still I drooled over it :P

    1. Re:Saw this at the Sony Building by loki1978 · · Score: 0

      Yes, this is a major drooler I was at Munich's Systems last year and will go again this year. I know i drooled last year at Sony's booth, but it looks like it will get even better this year

      --
      According to prophecy
    2. Re:Saw this at the Sony Building by Provocateur · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is Slashdot. You're supposed to stick this into your utility belt, along with the batarang and ninja smoke pellets. The handcuffs don't really belong in there. But you never know.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  9. IBM T221 by Trouvist · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Apparently no one here has ever heard of the IBM T221. Maximum resolution was 3840 x 2400, 32 bit color @ 13 hz.... it was only a 21" screen... Let's just say you haven't ever written a line of code until you can readably fit more than 100 lines onto the same editor view.

    1. Re:IBM T221 by Trouvist · · Score: 1

      Oh, as an addendum to my previous statement, the T221 technology was sold to Lenovo and from there to Sony. Sony used this technology in the PSP.

    2. Re:IBM T221 by zalas · · Score: 2, Informative

      I actually work with it in the lab. It was quite fun trying to read the tiny little terminal windows on the screen. Eventually, I just kicked the font size up and it looked beautifully crisp. Unfortunately, for some reason, MATLAB had defaulted to the super large font size, and made it temporarily impossible to use now that I switched back to a smaller dpi display.

    3. Re:IBM T221 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      13Hz, huh? The thing flashes too slow to even give anyone a migraine...

    4. Re:IBM T221 by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      13Hz is absolute worst case. Mine runs 30Hz and it's not a problem. The display is glorious for running photoshop.

    5. Re:IBM T221 by dfghjk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think plenty have heard of it. I own two.

      A couple corrections. The display is 22.2" diagonal and 13HZ is the slowest refresh when using a single DVI. There several versions of the monitor but all can do at least twice that refresh rate. I operate mine at 30Hz.

    6. Re:IBM T221 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint: It's not CRT. It doesn't flash.

    7. Re:IBM T221 by paedobear · · Score: 1

      Looking at the time-scale, that's very unlikely. Especially as the pixel-density of the PSP is particularly uninspiring. My mobile phone has a higher resolution (640x680), for instance.

    8. Re:IBM T221 by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      The display on the Nokia 770 does 800x480 (225dpi), and that's a cheap consumer device. Anyone who is surprised by this kind of technology has not been keeping up.

      TFT technology has been improving for a while, but not finding its way into mainstream devices. Unless you have something close to an exact multiple of 100 or 72dpi, then people who use primitive GUIs will complain that the text is too small to be readable.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:IBM T221 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's just say you haven't ever written a line of code until you can readably fit more than 100 lines onto the same editor view.

      I program in Perl, you insensitive clod. I have never gone over 100 lines of code.

  10. I think he has it backwards ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That tiny XBRITE display is easily readable, despite the number of pixels squeezed into close company

    He means "because of" the number of pixels. Presumably Sony is doing some anti-aliasing on the fonts to improve readability.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:I think he has it backwards ... by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      At those pixel sizes, they may not need to.

    2. Re:I think he has it backwards ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "he" you're refering to is a she :).

    3. Re:I think he has it backwards ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      My apologies.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:I think he has it backwards ... by Dasein · · Score: 1

      Yep. Using the reviewer's logic, those 1200DPI laser printers must be a real pain to read. I mean, how are you ever going to see all those little dots!

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    5. Re:I think he has it backwards ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming they've changed the default font sizes. If they haven't then the text will be harder to read due to the reduced size.

    6. Re:I think he has it backwards ... by coopex · · Score: 1

      You've missed the reviewer's point. Imagine printing 6pt text on a 600 DPI printer versus 12pt text on a 300 DPI printer. Both pages will use the same number of pixels, yet the 6pt is harder to read because it's smaller, as the XBRITE display is (suprisingly) easily readable, despite the small screen (with a higher DPI than most screens).

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    7. Re:I think he has it backwards ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      No I didn't. Modern OSes support font scaling and anti-aliasing, both of which benefit from high resolution. The fact that it has more pixels than other similar-sized displays still means the display should be more readable, not less.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  11. If it's $100 dollars then by zymano · · Score: 0

    I will buy one !

  12. I'm still boycotting them over the rootkit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They tried to rootkit us, dammit. And I never saw a real appology so much as a "we give up, please don't sue us, we want the bad PR to die now" scenario.

    Personally, I'm still boycotting them. When I got an HDTV, I totally ignored the Sonys. Whenever I get a laptop, I intend to do the same until such time as I know that they've really learned their lesson.

    1. Re:I'm still boycotting them over the rootkit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why? Because it pisses you off. Because I savor the thought of you shaking your fist from your basement dwelling in tiny rage.

      Actually, I don't get upset by trolls because I know they're trolling. Instead, I smile sweetly knowing that, no matter how hard they try, they can't actually upset them.

      And that really, really seems to piss some of them off once it finally sinks into their thick skulls :-)

  13. it's the keyboard, stupid by eliot1785 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Screw the screen - can you imagine typing on this? IMHO, the "ultra-mobile" line of computers will not succeed because of keyboard issues. The tablet PC's have already dealt with that effectively by becoming "notebooks" in the real sense of the word (you write directly on the screen with a pen). UMPC's are the worst of both worlds. Just go for a small laptop or tablet if you want mobility.

    1. Re:it's the keyboard, stupid by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      The screen is very readable and the keyboard very usable. You don't type on it like a desktop or laptop. It works like a large blackberry. It offers a stylus as well.

    2. Re:it's the keyboard, stupid by dunng808 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can't tell from the product descriptions if it does handwriting recognition, but the UX180P does have a touch screen and ships with a stylus. According to Microsoft the handwriting engine can be added, if not already there, by installing Office XP. Which are just about the only applications that can be used with handwriting recognition.

      Can this thing take the place of a cell phone? Here's what I want:

      • Digital ink notepad, for taking notes in meetings, classes, etc. where text recognition is intrusive.
      • Ability to enter text with a pen, such as what I am writing in this post ... could be text of a mail message, for example.
      • Cell phone.
      • A really smart calendar that will take the system out of stand-by to announce an appointment.
      • Web browser, mail client, all the usual PC stuff.
      After that, I wish it could run Linux or FreeBSD and that there was something like Gnome for tablets, with a useful hardwriting recognition system available to all Gnome apps. I know, I sound like a beauty pagent contestent wishing for world peace.
      --

      Gary Dunn
      Open Slate Project

    3. Re:it's the keyboard, stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As someone who has used a Samsung Q1 for a month, the first true UMPC on the market, I can tell you it is an upgrade from a PDA because it has a full Windows OS, namely the Tablet version. With the different options available, including ink, you don't really need a keyboard or a mouse. (And if you bought it for that kind of activity, I'd have to wonder why you bought a UMPC.)

      The point is to free you from being tied to a place for using a computer, and it is does this admirably. Even small laptops are bulky and heavy. I can couch potato with the Q1 and do email and web surfing, or I can take it to bed with me and watch the last bit of the game or whatever as I nod off (via SlingBox).

      I didn't learn to write on a typewriter or a keyboard, and I suspect most people don't/didn't, either. The keyboard is a paradigm, and one in need of shifting. (Handwriting recognition is very good, and in the UMPC community, many who own and use them claim to be "hen scratchers" with very little problem writing on the screen.) The Q1 even has a voice recorder, and with its 2 mics, captures all but the softest speakers, or those on the phone, in conferences.

      As for the Sony's (three UX versions, 50, 180, and something else, I forget), they aren't UMPCs in the ture sense, so the touch-pack doesn't come with them. Check the reviews, as some people complain about the cramped keyboard. (Which if true, doesn't seem to make much sense to have it, but it's probably a "YMMV" thing.)

      Some future models (not yet released) are purported to have cell (voice and data) capabilities built in, but none of the current releases (Samsing Q1 and TabletKiosk eo 7110 in the US so far) have that. If you haven't tried it, I'd highly recommend you test out a UMPC or one of the Sony's. They won't replace your workstation, but you might find with one you don't need a PDA or a laptop any more. I know I did!

    4. Re:it's the keyboard, stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you thumb everything instead of touch typing? Doesn't seem very intuitive. I can't decide if a soft keyboard (with the stylus) is a better option than the thumbing.

    5. Re:it's the keyboard, stupid by apflwr3 · · Score: 1

      The Gnome-based Nokia 770 has everything you asked for but the phones: http://www.mobileburn.com/review.jsp?Id=1376

    6. Re:it's the keyboard, stupid by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      it's completely "intuitive" just different. you can't use your fingers when they're busy holding the device.

      thumbing is clearly better than stylus typing. you obviously haven't tried one.

    7. Re:it's the keyboard, stupid by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > The Gnome-based Nokia 770 has everything you asked for but the phones

      Or the RAM. Try having two pages open in a browser.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  14. Sony UX? by glwtta · · Score: 3, Funny

    So... it's SUX for short? At least they are getting more honest. (Can't wait to buy a "Sony 0wnz J00!1!")

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  15. Apple by metamatic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I wish Apple would make tiny machines like this. The smallest laptop they have is too big for me.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Apple by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      I am so glad I am not alone here. I have long wished Apple would make a 9" iBook (well, now a MacBook) with no disc drive. They could do it, and it would probably only cost $600 for a system otherwise identical to the $1099 13" MacBook.

    2. Re:Apple by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What Apple needs is a 2lb, 10" convertible tablet. I'd buy that in a heartbeat!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Apple by refactoringdr · · Score: 2

      I'll sell you my Newton...It's close to those dimensions.

    4. Re:Apple by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      If it had modern specs (500mhz CPU, color high-resolution screen, Newton PIM apps running on top of an OS X kernel, ability to sync with OS X via USB or Bluetooth, etc.) I'd take you up on that, because you're right: that is what I want.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  16. I've played with it by iconeternal · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm an electronics salesman at staples, and we got them in today. We're one of the few stores in the nation to carry them, and even staples only has a few in.

    I played with it for a bit today, and I have to say I love the design. The screen is crisp and clear with a high framerate, the two cameras are amazing, the touch screen is very responsive, and even the thumbstick is nice. The fold out qwerty keyboard is nice, but it takes some getting used to.

    What strikes me is HOW small this thing really is. The original Origami concept was massive compared to this. It is barely bigger than two IPAQs glued together, and it weighs 1.4 lbs.

    Not to mention it comes with EVDO support.

    I'm impressed. Not 1700 dollars worth of impressed, but impressed none the less.

    1. Re:I've played with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It has EDGE not EVDO. EVDO is faster and is for CDMA networks not Cingular's GSM network. But it does look very sweet- I'm tempted to get one!

    2. Re:I've played with it by supremebob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that this product is a great idea, but I can't imagine more than just a few wealthy gadget freaks ponying up $1,700 for this thing. I guess that the rest of us will need to wait for Dell/Lenovo,HP,etc. to make a sub $1,000 version with a bit more storage than 30 GB.

    3. Re:I've played with it by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Not to mention it comes with EVDO support.

      EDGE support and crippled by being locked to Cingular at that! I wonder if an unlocked version is available for a few hundred more $? If I pay $1700 for a computer, I expect it not to be hobbled by assinine restrictions.

      -b.

    4. Re:I've played with it by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A call to Sony will get you the unlock code for no charge.

    5. Re:I've played with it by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      A call to Sony will get you the unlock code for no charge.

      Good to know. But why lock it in the first place, then?

      -b.

    6. Re:I've played with it by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because that slight inconvenience will stop people doing it / convenience will keep people on Cingular, ergo they'll be willing to pay a commission to Sony.

  17. Japan by frankyfranky · · Score: 4, Informative

    In my oppinion the resolution isn't really an issue. You can read standard 10 point with no real problems. You have to consider that this is a handheld device and so it would be held closer to your face than say, a laptop. They've had these things out for quite a while here in Japan. My biggest gripes with it is the size and price. The thing is really thick (bulky) and I just can't justify spending that much money. However, considering that's it's ligtweight and generaly easy to use it seems to be a good all around portable machine for those of us with deep pockets.

    And yes, it can run Linux.

  18. I'm quite satisfied with my device by ICECommander · · Score: 1

    This is perfect for my needs (and it runs Linux natively): http://www.nokiausa.com/770

    --
    All your Sybase are belong to us.
    1. Re:I'm quite satisfied with my device by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      If you keep it in your front pocket, do you still call it your Linux box?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:I'm quite satisfied with my device by smithmc · · Score: 1


        If you keep it in your front pocket, do you still call it your Linux box?

      Well, is that a Linux box in your pocket, or...

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  19. Not bad! by slashflood · · Score: 1

    It is a full featured computer with a 1.5 GHz processor and 512 MB RAM with a docking station to connect your monitor, usb keyboard/mouse and ethernet for about $1.700, but does it run Linux?

    1. Re:Not bad! by jZnat · · Score: 1

      If Sony's hardware history has anything to say about it, yes, it will run Linux. I'm running Linux on a Sony Vaio notebook, and this particular one has been running smoothly for over a year now.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  20. Two words... by alphax45 · · Score: 1

    Freaking sweet! Sure it's Sony, but name a company that makes cool stuff like this and is not evil. I want it!

    --
    K Man
    1. Re:Two words... by Winckle · · Score: 1

      Apple

    2. Re:Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple not evil? Tell that to the press they silence, etc. Grow up and realize almost every corporation on the planet has done something "evil"

  21. This isn't even a full review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a full review: http://reviews.digitaltrends.com/review3647.html

    This is a sweet little system!

  22. Old news - it's called a Psion by water-and-sewer · · Score: 4, Insightful
    First look? I saw one of these ages ago, back when they were called the Psion 5 (see http://therandymon.com/content/view/86/79/). Awright, the Psion didn't network at all, but it had a better keyboard and the two double-A batteries that kept it running lasted over 3 months.

    This is neat, but if I bought something like this it would be to write on, and that means the keyboard isn't good enough, the battery doesn't last long enough, and it's too heavy. We're still reinventing the wheel, poorly.

    --
    If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
    1. Re:Old news - it's called a Psion by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      The Poquet PC did it earlier with PC compatability: http://www.obsoletecomputermuseum.org/poqet_pc/

    2. Re:Old news - it's called a Psion by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      I preferred the Series 3. The 5 had a nicer looking keyboard, but it wasn't any nicer to type on than the 3, and the battery life was much worse. I typed a 3,000 word essay on my 3, for example. A pair of AA batteries would last a good two weeks with the 3, while you were lucky if they lasted more than a couple of days with the 5.

      There was also something indescribably cool about having a device running a multitasking OS, a GUI, and even shipping with a compiler and yet only needing 256KB of RAM, including long-term storage space.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Old news - it's called a Psion by smithmc · · Score: 1

        > First look? I saw one of these ages ago, back when they were called the Psion 5 (web link elided). Awright, the Psion didn't network at all

      Which IMO renders it practically useless by 2006 standards. I've got a 5mx at home myself, but I never use it - it's just too much of a pain to move text to and from it.

        > but it had a better keyboard

      Marginally. You certainly couldn't touch-type on it. The tactile feedback was terrible; I always found myself looking at the screen to see whether a given keypress was actually registered.

        > and the two double-A batteries that kept it running lasted over 3 months.

      You forgot to mention the display that was virtually unreadable except in really bright light.

      Come to think of it, the Revo/Mako was better than the 5mx for note-taking anyway. Excellent (if somewhat low-res) display, very bright and readable. The keyboard was smaller but had better feedback. But it had no networking capabilities either, so ultimately just as useless.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  23. Rootkit. Sony Bad by Trogre · · Score: 4, Funny

    This Vaio will suck.

    Nintendo will Wiin the console wars.

    Can I please have my mod points now?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  24. Zaurus still better by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I played with this device, but grew to dislike it. The thing is too big, runs too hot, eat batteries for breakfast, and the keyboard is barely usable. Nice that it runs WinXP and has two cameras.... but so what? Sorry, but the Zaurus still fits in your pocket, has a usable keyboard, and lasts 7 hours at a time.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:Zaurus still better by schmiddy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the Zaurus still fits in your pocket, has a usable keyboard, and lasts 7 hours at a time.

      In the article, they showed a picture of the Zaurus SL-C3200, which you can get for a mere $600, as opposed to something like $1800 for the Vaio they're touting. The Zaurus runs Linux, has built in 802.11b, 6 GB hard drive, and is plain cool. Why Sharp doesn't market it more here in the U.S. (apparently they've just barely gotten the programs + OS translated from Japanese to English..) is a mystery. It might be a little slower than the fancy schmancy Vaio, but for a little handheld, do you really need all that power? It's not like you're going to be running Seti@Home continuously on the damn thing. Not to mention the point about battery life. But then Sharp is known for having really cool gadgets that they manage to kill.

      Although I don't even have the $400 at the moment, I've known a few tech-savvy folks that absolutely love the Zaurus, and am hoping to get one soon. By the way, Mom, if you're reading this, my birthday's coming soon...

      --
      http://cltracker.net -- powerful craigslist multi-city search
    2. Re:Zaurus still better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL Me too! /AOL

      Currently reading Slashdot and posting this from an SL3100. It suits my needs just fine as a pseudo-laptop I can stick in my pocket. I agree with one of the other posters though - I only get about 90 min of continuous use of the wifi card under battery power. Still it's nice having zaurus plus stowaway keyboard in my bag all the time. One never knows when inspiration will strike...

    3. Re:Zaurus still better by Lbz8 · · Score: 1

      I think what people who have problems with this device fail to grasp is that this is not, and never was intended to be, a pda or pim. This is a full featured Windows XP Pro PC that approaches PDA size.

      So clearly, if you are just a note taker or a teen obsessed with emails or text messages, then clearly, I repeat, clearly this is not the machine for you. But no one ever said it was or should be.

      Yes the device has some shortcomings - what first gen product doesn't? And yes, it is not even the smallest in its class. But you must understand that you have pretty much all the essential features of any laptop computer weighing 5x and more. You can put all the files of any type you care to through the usual means and view them through the usual means on this machine. How many times have we heard moans of exasperation from users of music players and pdas complaining about formats and file sizes and conversions, etc. etc. Those problems are moot here - everything is native.

      I also don't believe this runs hot - as several people who have actually used it have indicated. Sony does not use metal but a solid, strong material that does not tend toward shifting, creaking or bending.

      Anyway, I think some of the discussion by a few people posting here show that they clearly don't get the intent and market this computer is aiming for. But for that market, it is a truly excellent device.

  25. Does it ...? Yes, it does! by slashflood · · Score: 3, Informative
  26. Sony by andydread · · Score: 1

    Nice micropc. maybe the smallest DRM infected PC in existence. While almost every electronic device I own is Sony. I will never buy another Sony product after their arrogance with that DRM infected CD fiasco and continued arrogance in the marketplace. DRM infected hardware is evil. They are the ring leaders of DRM infected locked down hardware.

    1. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time you buy Sony ... God kills a kitten

  27. Video Review at CNet by sootman · · Score: 3, Informative

    available here.

    Looks like a neat little unit. Pretty powerful, but the keyboard isn't super. If course, on any portable, there is a tradeoff between overall size and display & keyboard size.

    That said, I miss my Libretto. :-)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  28. VAIO quality by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
    I've played with a few VAIOs, and haven't really been impressed with the quality. Cheap, thin plastic. Cardbus slots stopping working after two months of use. Crappy support - spend two hours reinstalling from the restore partition and *only then* can you send the bl**dy thing to be repaired. And this isn't even mentioning the malware-ridden audio CD debacle...

    Give me the smallest iBook or MacBook any day. Older TiBooks aside, Apple's quality seems pretty good these days, and their laptops are light, well-designed, and powerful. Their pricing is even competitive once you realize what you're getting (small size/weight as well as features) for the price.

    -b.

    1. Re:VAIO quality by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 3, Informative

      I call bullshit!

      While you may have played with a few VAIO's, I actually own a VAIO laptop for 4 years. I have not experienced any of the deficiencies that you have cited. I work with fellow VAIO users who have the latest notebooks, and they are happy with their purchase.

      Out of the 4 years (so far!), I only had two problems.

      1. Hardrive died on the 2nd year and was easily replaced.

      2. My cat clawed off the keyboard and turned the laptop into an expensive paperweight. A call to Sony and 72 hours & $80 dollars later, I am back in business with a new keyboard. (I will go on record that I did scream, but the cat remained unharmed).

      Because of my experience with #2 above, I am now a loyal customer of Sony.

      But don't let the facts get in the way of you trying to show your coolness by being an Apple fanboy.

      Bill

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  29. ... and why is it locked to fucking Cingular?! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Informative
    Having a laptop that can't be used on other countries' mobile data networks would seem to be a pretty severe disadvantage for the business traveller.

    -b.

    1. Re:... and why is it locked to fucking Cingular?! by Quickening · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Does anyone know if this hardware is now fast enough to do any of the cellular networks protocols in software?

      --
      tcboo
    2. Re:... and why is it locked to fucking Cingular?! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Informative
      Does anyone know if this hardware is now fast enough to do any of the cellular networks protocols in software?

      Doesn't matter. With GSM/Edge, a SIM card is required, and if the SIM isn't a Cingular SIM, the wireless modem will refuse to play. Maybe there's a way of unlocking the thing, like you can do with many cell phones.

      -b.

    3. Re:... and why is it locked to fucking Cingular?! by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah.

      Call Sony and they'll give you the code to unlock it. Imagine that, reading the goddamn article.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  30. MdntToker There is 1 perfect word to describe you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baaaaa.

  31. Stupid keyboard design by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
    Instead of using keyboards that are put to shame by a TI-85 graphing calculator, wouldn't it be better to have some kind of full-sized (or almost so) keyboard that's hinged in the middle? Typing on this seems like a nightmare, and pen entry is annoying since I can type faster than I can write (legibly).

    -b.

    1. Re:Stupid keyboard design by VdG · · Score: 1

      I've got a U71 and that came with a small, hinged, USB keyboard which I use occasionally. I'm surprised that the UX180 doesn't come with something similar, (or maybe it does and I missed that). The one I have folds to about the same surface area as the Vaio and about 1cm thick.

      For people that want that there are a number of portable keyboards around these days. I suspect Sony felt that the built in keyboard was sufficient for mobile use. With my U71 I tend to use the handwriting recognition software when I'm out and about, with the software keyboard for anything where precision is required - passwords, URLs etc. (I wouldn't want to write an important document with it, but the handwriting recognition is fine for taking notes in meetings and doing a bit of email on the move.)

      There's nothing to stop you hooking up a full size monitor, keyboard and mouse if you're using it in an office. If I were regularly using it at a desk that's what I'd do.

  32. Target Market by skiflyer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Normally I hate reading the "cool, but I would never use it" posts... but I'm really curious, what do you guys think is the target market for this device?

    Too small for all day computing, too big to drop in most pockets... the thickness particularly seems to be a kicker.

    Anyway geek factor, very high... practical factor, I'm wracking my brain and can't think of the application.

    1. Re:Target Market by VdG · · Score: 3, Informative

      For me, a traditional PDA is of very limited use. All I really want in a package that small is diary and contacts stuff, which is already on my 'phone. (Along with loads of other things I hardly ever use.)

      Something like the Vaio is clearly not as useable as a proper laptop or as portable as a PDA but it gives something of both. I can sling my U71 in a briefcase, satchel or whatever and it offers me much, much more than a PDA.

      I use it for Internet radio and for taking notes. It's also a good portable library: shift the display to portrait and it'll show a page of a manual quite nicely. You could read a novel on it if you wanted, I guess, though I don't.

      This is a machine I can take with me when I'm travelling on business without having to take extra luggage, and still have access to all my personal stuff - email, usenet, banking: things I can't use my company laptop for.

      I also use it for RPG stuff, so I can have all my notes in one convenient package.

      It serves as a photo album: most of my holiday snaps are on it now so I can show them to my parents without having to cut CDs or worry about storage.

      It's powerful enough for use as a workstation but if you were doing that you'd want to hook it up to a proper monitor and keyboard. But that's no different to the way I use my work laptop.

      I don't think anyone could say that this - or any of its competitors are cheap, but it does fill an interesting niche. I could live without my U71, but I do enjoy having it.

    2. Re:Target Market by thedletterman · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, I've been mulling over replacing my work laptop with one of these. It would easily slip into a briefcase, and there is an available docking station that comes with it. You don't need to use the 4" screen or the foldout keyboard. You can slip it out and stick it into the cradle, and it's business as usual on a 20" LCD screen, ethernet and a fullsize keyboard and mouse.

      When I'm done for the day, there's nothing to synch, and there's no disruption in workflow. I just pop it out and head out the door. I don't need 10 hours of battery life, in fact, only enough to use it on the train while I go from my office back home. I'll never forget a file, miss an email, etc.

      The 1 lb portability, and dockstation is what makes this a very atttractive solution to me. Now I don't have to carry a laptop bag anymore, and this thing will whip out while on the go much easier than a fullsize laptop ever will. If I had a car, this would also make one of those $39 GPS receivers totally worthwhile.

      --
      Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
  33. That's debatable by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here's a list of things that work and things that don't:
    Working features:

    1. Keyboard
    2. Mouse
    3. Screen (doesn't fill the screen yet)
    4. USB is detected (obviously because we booted from it!)
    5. CardBus chipset (which houses the Cingular WWAN adapter).

    Non Working features:

    1. VAIO button
    2. Fingerprint scanner
    3. Intel WiFi card
    4. Zoom buttons
    5. Touchscreen (this might work if I look into it more..maybe later)
    6. Camera's DON'T work

    Would you be happy spending that much money and discover that half of the hardware that makes it useful doesn't work?

    1. Re:That's debatable by korny · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is pretty normal for any brand-new laptop though. It looks as if all the hard stuff works - once the basic system, display and mouse are working, the rest are just devices.

      In fact, it's quite probable that some of these devices will already work with the right driver revisions - linux support is actually quite good for most Intel wifi devices:
      http://ipw3945.sourceforge.net/
      and many fingerprint scanners:
      http://www.upek.com/support/dl_linux_bsp.asp

      I have both of these working fine in Ubuntu 6.06 on a ThinkPad X60 - I'm not sure if the fingerprint scanner is the same, but it's meant to be the same as what's on the Sony sz-140 series.

      - Korny

    2. Re:That's debatable by sapgau · · Score: 1

      Wow that's pretty bad. Does it also have Bluetooth? I still haven't seen Bluetooth working on a demo laptop at the store. It never is configured properly.

    3. Re:That's debatable by slashflood · · Score: 1

      His report is obviously about the first install. I guess that the cameras are supported, because the one integrated in my Vaio C1XD is working as well. THe Intel WiFi card is certainly supported and the touchscreen is nothing special. The Vaio buttons/zoom buttons should be covered with ACPI.

    4. Re:That's debatable by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      That might be deliberate- think of all the security issues they'd have.

    5. Re:That's debatable by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Linux on just about any device!

  34. Not what I want by Compuser · · Score: 1

    Give me something with twice the screen size (and a decent resolution 1600x1200 plz).
    Make it an OLED for readability and shrink the thickness of the device about twice.
    Make flash-based HDD and removable (hot-plug) wireless module for low power consumption.
    Nuke the keyboard (I can lug my own, just give me a few usb ports).

    1. Re:Not what I want by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      And while you're at it, you'd probably like a pony. Or are you willing to pay $7,500 or more a unit for such a device?

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    2. Re:Not what I want by nuzak · · Score: 1

      There's nothing at all unreasonable in those specs. Except for the ridiculous screen size he wants, it sounds a lot like a Clie VZ90. Japan only, of course.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    3. Re:Not what I want by Compuser · · Score: 1

      I go to scientific conferences and it would be nice to have an ultralight (4 lbs is way too
      heavy) device which I could carry around all day, take notes on, and then also use it to show
      other people my data (which is high res so I need 1600x1200 for it to look best). It is the
      kind of usage that UMPC is supposedly designed for, except it is just slightly too heavy, way
      too bulky (thick), the screen is too small, and battery life is about a third of what would be
      useful for a day at the conference center without recharge.
      Battery life could be improved by having no HDD, using slower RAM, and OLED screen (and of course
      no wireless and no optical drives). Thickness could be improved by, you guessed it, OLED
      screen (100 micron thick screens were demonstrated already), solid state HDD, and no optical
      drives. There is also technology for cell phones to make the casing of the device act as a
      battery - scale that to tablet level and you've got some major improvements.
      What I am asking for is for someone to use the best tech out there to squeeze every last bit of
      utility out of a tablet. No leaps in technology necessary.

  35. Re:Rootkit. Sony Bad by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    Not until you make a cheap jab at Steve Ballmer.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  36. SUV = Station Wagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



                                                                  SUV = Station Wagon

    That's all there is to it. The only difference is, it costs twice as much as it should cost.

  37. Re:Rootkit. Sony Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No! *throws chair*

    Oh sorry, wrong cliche

  38. wow....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a bifocal-wearing myopic

    wow... you can read minds?

  39. and why does that matter? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Just because it'll only use Cingular SIMs doesn't mean it won't work in other countries. You just have to keep using your Cingular SIM (and paying Cingular) when you are in those other countries.

    Are you new to GSM or something?

    I buy my phones unlocked, because I like the options. But I also understand that most devices are sold locked in the US but that doesn't mean you can't make calls or use data overseas.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:and why does that matter? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Because this retarded locking nonsense has all of the appeal of region-coded DVDs.

      Paraphrasing Paul radically: "I never wanted to be a thug until you laid these rules on me." (Romans 7)

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    2. Re:and why does that matter? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Just because it'll only use Cingular SIMs doesn't mean it won't work in other countries. You just have to keep using your Cingular SIM (and paying Cingular) when you are in those other countries.

      Where "paying Cingular" = "getting sodomized without lube by Cingular". Pre-paid SIMs abroad are so much cheaper than int'l roaming.

      To give Sony some credit, the thing is unlockable, but why wait on the line to talk to some tech support asshat when the thing should be unlocked in the *first* place, or at least the unlock code should be clearly printed in the owner's manual.

      -b.

  40. How much does it cost? by kinema · · Score: 1

    How much does the damn thing cost? From the article I know it cost "$400 less than the similarly spec-d import UX90" but considering the I have no idea what the UX90 is let alone how much it cost how am I supposed to know from the "review" how much it costs?

    1. Re:How much does it cost? by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

      It costs $750 less than a DB8512NMC912 2000 Ultra (or £852 with optional Flux Capacitor)

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  41. at least it's not made by BMG! :) by Xtifr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm not sure why everyone leaps to blame Sony for the actions of the Sony-BMG group. There were two partners in that group; one a moderately well-respected electronics giant, and the other a notoriously evil recording company. Just because you'd only heard of one of them doesn't mean that that one deserves all the blame. How come I never see this sort of comment when a BMG-related story is posted? ;)

  42. Bend over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a Sony

  43. Anyone Managed to Run Linux on it? by dushkin · · Score: 1

    So, anyone managed to run Linux on it yet? ^_^

    --
    o hai
  44. Glossy displays by ward.deb · · Score: 1

    What's it with these glossy displays lately? I'm sure contrast improves, but it looks like a mirror. Especially with a mobile device like this one it'll be quite annoying to use it outside. Just my two cents...

  45. 7 hours? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    What are you smoking, I want some.

    If I put a WiFI card and connect to the net, the most I get is one hour from a fully charged battery.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  46. Re:at least it's not made by BMG! :) by gutnor · · Score: 1

    In real life, if you associate yourself with a total jerk, you know that your reputation will suffer.
    If you had a good reputation before, that's normal people notice more the degradation.

    So in the case Sony BMG, you expect nothing from BMG. But you would have expected that Sony would have maintained a certain level of dignity. Well that was not the case, and yes only Sony lost something since BMG had already nothing to lose and yes that affect the global perception of Sony as a whole.

  47. Yes by slashmojo · · Score: 3, Informative
  48. Re:Video Review at CNet - Get a "new" libretto! by tiluki · · Score: 1

    Yeah - the Libretto is great...

    That's why I went and got a second-hand one off of Ebay and put Linux on it!

    http://librettoalive.blogspot.com/

    OK, so I'm still tinkering with it, but it's great! Very portable and fast enough to run X (although I must admit I use it mostly as a terminal with display on the framebuffer).

  49. But the real question is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What sort of rootkits does it come with?

  50. Dell M70 screen by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    I've got a lappy with a 1920x1200 15.4" screen, only 155 pixels per inch, and I ended up getting a 24" monitor to go with it for work. At the end of an 8 hour day, doing word processing and CAD, my eyes were pretty much freaking out. I wouldn't expect someone to spend lots of hours per day on this thing, but its certainly going to need a pretty close eye distance.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  51. Same res - larger screen? by Insane_zoD · · Score: 1

    Now where's my 21" LCD with the same resolution. Max resolution these days that is readily available is maybe 1920x1200 or so. I'm sure I'm missing some technology limitations, but 5500x3200 should be possible if you could just have a bigger LCD panel with the same resolution per inch. Is there some technology limitation.... or are manufacturers just being stupid?

    1. Re:Same res - larger screen? by OfNoAccount · · Score: 1

      With desktop panels the connection interface is the limiting factor. Single-link DVI is maxed out @ 1920x1080 (HD), and using analog connections to a digital display would be suboptimal. DVI dual-link reaches 2048×1536, but you're still well short of your 5500x3200 target.

      If you want high-res, then there's the 22" IBM T220/221 which had a native resolution of 3840x2400. It used four DVI channels, but unfortunately the max refresh rate was still limited to only 48Hz...

    2. Re:Same res - larger screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Single-link DVI is maxed out @ 1920x1080 (HD)

      Just a comment. You can drive a 1920x1200@60Hz lcd with single link DVI; You just have to do it with reduced blanking.

    3. Re:Same res - larger screen? by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      The IBM can be driven by one or two DVI channels as well. Refresh rates are reduced. Mine is driven by two DVI's at 30Hz.

      DVI supports 1920x1200.

    4. Re:Same res - larger screen? by OfNoAccount · · Score: 1

      Thanks :) As it happens I'm aware you can drive the T220/221 with one DVI channel - but then you can't actually use the full resolution of the panel. Since pretty much the only reason to buy it is the high resolution this would be... how shall I put it... marginally sub-optimal ;)

      As the a/c has mentioned, 1920x1200 out of a single DVI channel requires a reduced blanking interval. Should be OK since you're using an LCD which doesn't need the flyback time, but as I understand it, it's officially still out-of-spec. So, it's possible that it won't be supported by the graphics card and/or another display device - in other words, whilst you may be able to, you can't guarantee you will be able to get 1920x1200 out of a single channel, which was my (somewhat incautiously worded) original point. The DVI v1.0 specifies 5% blanking interval, so that's what's guaranteed to work, anything else, well YMMV...

  52. Screen Resolution by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 0

    There's nothing wrong with higher resolutions in smaller screens. The problem is that GUI components are often based on pixel measurements rather than inches or millimeters. An inch is an inch, no matter how many pixels one can fit into it. The more pixels, the finer the detail, which should be what we are striving for. Vector based images have no problem in this scheme, it is raster images that must be scaled and anti-aliased which can sometimes make them look a bit blurry or even blocky. Once screens get away from being 72 DPI and start having paper like resolutions, this will be less of an issue. Graphics layout should be in millimeters or inches rather than pixels or DPI. Screens will obviously still have a DPI, but people will want to buy the screen that has the higher DPI just like they do with a printer or scanner.

  53. About time! by KlomDark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm one of the people blessed with above-average vision (20/10 rather than the standard 20/20). This means I can see the individual pixels in a normal LCD monitor from several feet away. Gets annoying at times, especially anti-aliasing, which just looks to me like a bunch of gray pixels surrounding the actual letters.

    However, with the new smaller pixels in things like this 4.5" 1024x768 screen (And the 17" 1920x1280 monitor in my Dell d810 laptop), I finally am not annoyed by the pixels. I have to get within a foot of the screen now to see the individual pixels. I think it rocks.

    My apologies to those with lesser vision, but imagine what it would be like for those of you to look at a screen with 1/10 inch (or bigger) pixels. Yuck.

    I've been hoping for this since a few years ago IBM announced their ($20000!!) monitor with pixels 1/5 the size of normal ones.

    Now if we could just get to the resolution of paper! Bring back vector graphics technology rather than relying on pixels.

  54. Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read that it was "Windows Vista Ready".
    I was wondering what video adapter it had because if you want to run Vista's Aero interface you need a better than average video adapter to make sure it runs the new interface smoothly.

  55. It's a thumb board by blorg · · Score: 1

    The idea is that you can type on it while holding it in your hands. You cannot do this with hinged keyboards. If you need something bigger for portable use, you could get something like the Thinkoutside Stowaway Bluetooth; I have one and it works great while folding up very small. Or as others have suggested a folding/rolling USB keyboard.

  56. Finally the full review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The full review of it is finally published:

    http://www.mobiletechreview.com/sony_ux180/Sony-Va io-UX180P.htm