Slashdot Mirror


Indian Satellite Lost in Launch Explosion

An anonymous reader writes "BBC News is reporting that the recent communications satellite launch in India has met with disaster. The satellite, designed to enhance India's telephone and communications network, was lost when the rocket carrying it veered off course and exploded. This is the second disappointment in recent launch attempts, coming just one day after the failed long-range ballistic missile test launch."

208 comments

  1. Noone would call this a firework? by euice · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How come that there is always a 404 right after a story was submitted?

    1. Re:Noone would call this a firework? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      I think they use a cron job to move stories to the front page. If I wasn't indifferent I'd go figure out how the source works, it's on sf.net if you want to look yourself.

  2. well by MrSquirrel · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess it's a good thing NASA doesn't outsource.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    1. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny? I was under the impression that NASA outsources most everything to companies like Boeing, Raytheon, etc.

    2. Re:well by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1, Funny

      feeding the 400M people there that live on a dollar a day

      Now now... if Vishnu wanted them to eat, she would have put them in a better castle.

    3. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Luckily, no cows were injured in the accident."

    4. Re:well by tempestdata · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its not like NASA hasn't blown up a few shuttles itself. This literally IS rocket science. Its very easy to goof up. Give the Indians a break. Would you want them posting on slashdot "NASA Should have outsourced" when NASA has its next exploding rocket/space shuttle?

      --
      - Tempestdata
    5. Re:well by dracken · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe you should read this.

      "India's six remote-sensing satellites - the largest such constellation in the world. These monitor the country's land and coastal waters so that scientists can advise rural communities on the location of aquifers and where to find watercourses, suggest to fishermen when to set sail for the best catch, and warn coastal communities of imminent storms (see "Eyes in the sky"). India's seven communication satellites, the biggest civilian system in the Asia-Pacific region, now reach some of the remotest corners of the country, providing television coverage to 90 per cent of the population. The system is also being used to extend remote healthcare services and education to the rural poor."

      Or this about PSLV

      "It was developed to allow India to launch its Indian Remote Sensing (IRS) satellites into sun synchronous orbits, a service that was, until the advent of the PSLV, commercially viable only from Russia"

    6. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I would suggest you find out the number of indians working for NASA. The joke would be on you my friend.

    7. Re:well by rts008 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Very good reply! Well done.
      This is what keeps me coming back to /. when I decide to give up on it due to the inane, kneejerk, blatant fanboy, etc. posts that are getting more numerous all the time.

      Your post was:
      concise, informative, not insulting/derogatory, and directly addressed the point.
      I heartily give you A+ since I have no mod points to give. :)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    8. Re:well by sachu · · Score: 1
    9. Re:well by alshithead · · Score: 1

      Hey! Wait a minute, you were supposed to flame him for being pro India. Actually, they have been doing a great job overall. I wish the US had a recent record as good as theirs. I fully expected them to have a successful launch and I'm disappointed they didn't. You can't fault them. Their record of satellite launches has been great and is actually enviable. The US space program needs more funding and better management before they become "has beens"...if it isn't too late already.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    10. Re:well by alamandrax · · Score: 2, Informative

      Vishnu is a "he". He only takes the female form when required. Batteries not included.

      --
      'tis but a scratch.
    11. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      >These monitor the country's land and coastal waters

      Still we couldn't rescue people from Tsunami even when we had 4 hrs of time...Please don't give excuses.

      The biggest problem is we don't hire right people. We hire people based on their religion and caste rather than merit.

    12. Re:well by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I'm always up for an opportunity to bolster my sense of baseless, nationalistic superiority, NASA's had some strings of bad luck, too.

      The Loss of Mars Observer. Oops.
      Whatever Happened to the Mars Polar Lander? Double Oops.
      NASA's metric confusion caused Mars orbiter loss. Durh...

      Space exploration -- even just putting stuff into orbit -- is a risky proposition at the best of times. Any agency pushing the envelope of what they've done before is bound to have some failures, but this is sometimes the price you pay for eventual success.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    13. Re:well by morpheus83 · · Score: 1

      What about the thousands of Indians working in NASA !!!

    14. Re:well by William+Robinson · · Score: 1
      Oh, dont be so hard. Shit happens and happens everywhere. Hope you have not forgotten failures within US including Shuttle explosion.

      They are trying, and eventually get there. Unlike their neighbours, who promote terr'rism, they are doing great job and they are moving in positive direction. Let's help and encourage them.

      And yes, as somebody else has pointed out, dont forget that Nasa is full of Indians. Imagine, they all quit and join India, you will have no choice except *outsourcing* the space program to India.

    15. Re:well by hopethisnickisnottak · · Score: 1

      Now now... if Vishnu wanted them to eat, she would have put them in a better castle.

      Our gods aren't gender confused. It would be nice if you weren't either. Vishnu is definitely a male.

      --
      -Shaunak
    16. Re:well by _tognus · · Score: 1

      Not to diminish the grandparent's post in any way, but +90% of the post was quotes from other sources, which can be read in lieu of Slashdot.

      Sorry, just had to slash that diminutive spark of hope that arose within you. After all, this is Slashdot.

    17. Re:well by huge+colin · · Score: 1

      Baseless, hm? What's the only country to ever land a human on another world? That's right.

    18. Re:well by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is a news conglomeration site with comments. i.e. slashdot reports no news itself it merely directs you to the news.

      Also in every other respectible field comments/opinions with regerences are worth far more than those without.

      I welcome comments than can back up what they say.

      Now if I only had a reference for my opinions...

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    19. Re:well by SheeEttin · · Score: 1
      This literally IS rocket science
      At least it's not brain surgery. (Wouldn't wan't anything veering and exploding there!)
    20. Re:well by Willuknight · · Score: 1

      Well it's not america you idiot, unless you're counting a moon as a planet :P

      --
      Do not anger the Karma Whores, for they don't bathe often, and might decide to come visit you in person. -Ryan Amos
    21. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that Indian President and Prime Minister were obviously chosin because of their caste....

    22. Re:well by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      My bad. I was confusing him with that ice chick from Final Fantasy.

    23. Re:well by hopethisnickisnottak · · Score: 1

      No harm done.
      I didn't get the Final fantasy reference. Anyway, forget it!

      --
      -Shaunak
    24. Re:well by bagsc · · Score: 1

      Time to just switch to metric already. Maybe if we all tell our Congressmen that it will make gas prices look cheaper...

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    25. Re:well by rawvsh · · Score: 1

      Oh Yeah. NASA wants to be solely responsible for blasting all the space shuttles...

    26. Re:well by huge+colin · · Score: 1
      Well it's not america you idiot, unless you're counting a moon as a planet :P
      Did I say "planet"? Nope. I said "world", which is defined as "a celestial body". The Moon is a celetial body. The US is the only country to have landed a human on another world.

      Who's the idiot now? Hint: you.
    27. Re:well by Willuknight · · Score: 1

      world = planet, a moon is not a world.

      --
      Do not anger the Karma Whores, for they don't bathe often, and might decide to come visit you in person. -Ryan Amos
    28. Re:well by huge+colin · · Score: 1
      world = planet, a moon is not a world.

      Did you even read what I wrote? By definition, "world" refers to a celestial body, which may be a planet, but may also be a moon. This definition isn't exactly open to debate. If you like, you can rephrase what I said earlier: The United States is the only country to ever have landed a human on another celestial body.
  3. Indian Astronauts by Durrok · · Score: 5, Funny

    Monday's flight was also supposed to set the stage for an Indian mission to the Moon.

    Something tells me there may be a lack of volunteers for this now...

    --
    I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
    1. Re:Indian Astronauts by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

      Sorry but... "Thank-you... PLEASE come again.."

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    2. Re:Indian Astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The moon mission (chandrayan) is going to be an unmanned one. And yes, it appears that NASA and ESA are indeed in talks to 'outsource' some of their moon probes to that mission.

    3. Re:Indian Astronauts by linvir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you kidding? If they had to resort to calling foreigners at random (India should be quite good at this) in search of volunteers, and happened upon me, I'd be up there in a shot. I'd sell the maximum removable quantity of my organs for a shot at standing on the moon, even if I had to take that shot on an overcrowded Indian vehicle that could explode unexpectedly at any moment.

    4. Re:Indian Astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's enough of them there to last us a while.

    5. Re:Indian Astronauts by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 4, Funny

      You should keep in mind that it will be a mission to the moon, not a mission to and from it.

    6. Re:Indian Astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? I'd still go, and I think many others would volunteer for a one-way mission as well.

    7. Re:Indian Astronauts by rts008 · · Score: 1

      I would be right beside you if possible.
      I watched N. Armstrong take that "small step" in '69, and have always been wanting to follow in his footsteps, literaly as well as figuritivily...but NASA had some strict requirements that a 20/200 vision, 230 lb., 5'10 geek had a lil' bit of a problem overcoming to that end, so, maybe India will call me- I'll go!

      side note: the pic's from Mars excited me quite a bit, and filled me with wonder.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    8. Re:Indian Astronauts by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      ...even if I had to take that shot on an overcrowded Indian vehicle that could explode unexpectedly at any moment.

      How realistic does the chance have to be? Could we just stick a skyrocket up your ass, light it, and watch :-)?

      --
      That is all.
    9. Re:Indian Astronauts by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So what? I'd still go, and I think many others would volunteer for a one-way mission as well.
      Not me. Frankly there are many more interesting places on Earth I haven'tseen yet (for that matter, India itself). The reason nobody has been to the moon for the last few decades is mainly because there's nothing much up there.
    10. Re:Indian Astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there is no dearth of volunteers after columbia and challenger for NASA space shuttle program.
      Genesis crash has not stopped any other missions. Everyone learns from failures. Good part is, there was no life, Indian or non Indian, was lost in this entire episode.

    11. Re:Indian Astronauts by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

      There is nothing much up there? And you know this how?

    12. Re:Indian Astronauts by Danga · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is nothing much up there? And you know this how?

      Maybe the vast, barren, unihabitable, crater filled surface that is the moon from EVERY picture of it? Compare that to all of the wonderful, life filled, comfortable places on Earth you can visit instead and it's not hard to wonder why someone would rather travel the world and live rather risk travelling to the moon with a much higher chance of not making it back.

      I do think it would be cool to travel to the moon, but I do see the point that travelling the Earth would be more enjoyable overall not to mention having much less chance of dying.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    13. Re:Indian Astronauts by KimmoA · · Score: 0

      Chance? You don't wanna live, then, huh? Or do you mean "risk"?

    14. Re:Indian Astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont think so...since some people were ready after the similar columbia explosion of NASA :P

    15. Re:Indian Astronauts by Danga · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey dipshit, risk and chance are synonyms and the same thing in the context I used them. Just as a refresher I used "risk" and "chance" in the same sentence as synonyms (had to repeat that for you since you fail to understand what a synonym is / and/or what the definition of chance and risk are or you wouldn't have made such a stupid comment) "...it's not hard to wonder why someone would rather travel the world and live rather risk travelling to the moon with a much higher chance of not making it back."

      From the definition of chance from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/chance:

      "A risk or hazard; a gamble: took a chance that the ice would hold me."

      Note that that sentence could also be: "took a risk that the ice would hold me."

      As to part of my other sentence: "...not to mention having much less chance of dying."

      I was using chance in the same context as the previous sentence.

      Don't insult people smarter than you especially when you are wrong, you can put your dunce cap back on now.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    16. Re:Indian Astronauts by KimmoA · · Score: 0

      Chance = positive.
      Risk = negative.
      Probability = neutral.

      You have words for all these "feelings"/situations in English, yet you keep using the positive-sounding "chance" in every context? Silly...

    17. Re:Indian Astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually there is a LOT in the moon, it will be discovered in the near future :)
      no, not aliens :P

    18. Re:Indian Astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An Indian American actually died on columbia.

    19. Re:Indian Astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chance as an expression of risk is not a positive word. "There's a chance of rain." "There's a chance you may die." "There's a chance we will have to amputate your leg."

      The usage of chance to implicate positive cannotation is when it is used as a synonym for opportunity. "I had a chance to play frisbee after dinner." "I had a chance to sit down and drink iced tea after a long day of yard work."

      The favorable word that you're looking for is opportunity, not chance. Chance can go either way.

  4. Dang! by Morky · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rockets is hard!

    1. Re:Dang! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      So is grammar. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Dang! by Morky · · Score: 1

      The grammar was the point of the joke, genius.

    3. Re:Dang! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      One man's funny is another man's stupid....

      As for me, I deal with far too many stupid people and/or their handiwork in my life. I find it very hard to find stupidity funny... except perhaps the Darwin awards. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:Dang! by Morky · · Score: 1

      Think of Cleavis the slack-jawed yokel from the Simpsons standing over his failed attempt to put a satellite into orbit, then read the post again.

  5. I think it was by drpimp · · Score: 4, Funny

    Homer Simpson who said it best .... "DOH!"

    --
    -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    1. Re:I think it was by bakawally · · Score: 1

      All of the other bad slashdot jokes get modded down and a played out simpsons line gets modded funny? wtf guys.

  6. This just in by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Building rockets is as hard as rocket science.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:This just in by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2, Funny
      Building rockets is as hard as rocket science.

      Well, at least it's not brain surgery.

    2. Re:This just in by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Everyone says this, but the truth is, it's not rocket science. It's rocket engineering.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:This just in by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I didn't not say it was rocket science, just as hard as rocket science.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  7. It isn't as easy as it looks... by Erwos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not surprised. It sounds easy to launch a rocket (hell, we've been doing it since forever, right?), yet in the light of this failure, North Korea's blown ICBM launch, and SpaceX's spectacular failure a while back, perhaps the difficulty of such things needs to be reassessed in the minds of the average Slashdot reader.

    Certainly, the ESA and NASA have something to be proud of when they actually manage to get stuff into orbit :).

    -Erwos

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    1. Re:It isn't as easy as it looks... by mukund · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It certainly isn't as easy as it looks but it's certainly cheaper (and hence easier in this case) than it costs. The Nazis under Hitler were producing V2 rockets at the rate of about 800/month which cost orders of magnitude lower [about $13,000 / rocket after the first 5000 according to the article linked below] than current rockets back in the 1940s and which could reach low Earth orbit. Modern rockets are definitely better equipped, but still the costs for unmanned rocketry can be brought down a LOT if more launches were made and the error margin was allowed to be lowered a bit.

      (Granted, this commentry is about launchers that put payload in low Earth orbits, and the Indian rocket was likely one which put payload in a GTO. The point still is valid.)

      John Walker has a good article about this.

      --
      Banu
    2. Re:It isn't as easy as it looks... by EvanED · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What you say is true. Actually, last night I arrived back home after spending about 3 weeks at Norway's Andoya Rocket Range where a little over a week ago there was the launch of a sounding rocket I helped build the payload for as a project at college. Our launch was in conjunction with another launch from actual scientists in Europe called HotPay1. The HotPay launch came 26 minutes after ours. Unfortunately, 7 to 8 seconds into flight either the payload broke off the motor or the motor broke in half. (As of last I heard, they weren't sure what happened.) So these things still do NOT always go well.

      And that was just a single stage sounding rocket too; not even in the same category as an orbital flight.

      P.S. I'd have started this post with "you might even say 'it IS rocket science" but another poster took that joke already...

    3. Re:It isn't as easy as it looks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact India has successfully launched several satellites into orbit. This was the first time they were trying to launch a heavier payload.

    4. Re:It isn't as easy as it looks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      , but still the costs for unmanned rocketry can be brought down a LOT if more launches were made

      Not really, the Russians are down to $1-2k/lb and the quasi-mass production wouldn't lower the costs of rockets that much (too complex and all). Keep in mind that if the Russians were sending the Shuttle up with their safety margins we'd have -2 shuttles by now. Also, what are you going to send up? Sattelites aren't doing that well and the difference between $1000/lb and $2000/lb doesn't matter that much as it's still way too much.

    5. Re:It isn't as easy as it looks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nasa has been milking TRILLIONS out of the U.S. for decades.

      Time to give Spacedev http://www.spacedev.com/ a shot

      and

      SpaceX a shot http://www.spacex.com/

    6. Re:It isn't as easy as it looks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly, the ESA and NASA have something to be proud of when they actually manage to get stuff into orbit :)

      Although sabotage to prevent proliferation of rocket tech is obviously less of a consideration for those established agencies.

      </sundaybesttinfoilhat>

    7. Re:It isn't as easy as it looks... by lelitsch · · Score: 1

      Uh, no. The payload is usually more expensive than the rocket. The economic return from a commercial rocket launch always is more than what the launch costs. Otherwise, nobody would use communications satellites, for example.

      Also, part of the low costs of V2 were due to the fact that the Nazis used slave labor to build them. I wouldn't want any country to get any ideas along thse lines.

      Additionally, the V2 never reached LEO. They were designed to crash into the ground around 300 kilometers from their launch site.

    8. Re:It isn't as easy as it looks... by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Granted, this commentry is about launchers that put payload in low Earth orbits, and the Indian rocket was likely one which put payload in a GTO. The point still is valid.
      Is it still valid? It's not just that the payload is extra mass to lift, the payload is worth millions of dollars. Surely that affects the cost/benefit analysis of mass-producing shoddy rockets.
    9. Re:It isn't as easy as it looks... by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      Certainly, the ESA and NASA have something to be proud of when they actually manage to get stuff into orbit :).

      What about Russia?

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    10. Re:It isn't as easy as it looks... by jangid · · Score: 1

      >> ertainly, the ESA and NASA have something to be proud of when they actually manage to get stuff into orbit :). Did you forget "Discovery" shuttle which blew just 5-10 minutes before landing?

    11. Re:It isn't as easy as it looks... by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      That would be Columbia, not Discovery.

      Rest in Peace, brave souls.

    12. Re:It isn't as easy as it looks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell, we've been doing it since forever, right?

      hell, no, not right. we (german people) have been doing it for you (us people) since forever (= end of world war II), right? :-)

  8. Props to India for trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a lot of respect for countries which have a space program and attempt to launch rockets into space, whether they succeed or not.

    1. Re:Props to India for trying by djupedal · · Score: 0, Troll

      'Props' aren't going to get them very far, what with the thin air they will have to deal with very soon following lift-off.

      Now, on the other hand, some damn good curry, packed real tight into that shiny 1.8 meter cylinder just might be the ticket...

      ...props...I don't believe it.

      "who...?"
      "Props, man, open up!"
      "Props ain't here man!"
      "No, man! I'M PROPS, lemme in, man, I got the stuff!!"

    2. Re:Props to India for trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your "anti-props" are not going to stop them either. Success and failure is part of the process. If Nasa was listening to pessimistic folks like you, after Discovery failure, they would have been selling burgers

  9. Re:disappointment? by ashyanbhog · · Score: 0, Informative

    He's referring to India's failed AGNI III missile test launch

  10. Re:disappointment? by grapeape · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually it was one day after India tested their missile.

    From the Article:
    "It came a day after a test-fire of India's longest-range nuclear-capable ballistic missile ended in failure."

    Yep, it didnt get much press, guess no one cared since it was a "friendly" country testing this time.

  11. Re:disappointment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Submitter is referring to the failed Indian ICBM test launch, not the North Korean launch.

  12. In other news... by Cherita+Chen · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, Pakistan is reporting that it will not seek retribution for the explosion which rocked their capital earlier this morning, as no casualties have been reported. Pakistani Prime Minister Shaukat Azis was quoted as saying, "Satellite my ass, you missed bitch"...

    --
    I'm not fat, just big boned...
    1. Re:In other news... by belal1 · · Score: 1

      for all we know, maybe NATO just blew it up to show that no one other than the western allies should have successful space programs.

    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To which Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad retorted "Durka Durka, Sherpa Sherpa, Dirka Lurka Birka... MOHAMMED JIHAD, Nuclear energy to feed our people, MOHAMMED JIHAD!"

      Ok, cue the islamic death sentence and/or CIA egyptian torture rendition.

    3. Re:In other news... by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

      Sattelites are launched to the *east*, to take advantage of the Earth's rotation. Pakistan is to the *west* of India.

      Replace Pakistan with China, and you might have something...

      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    4. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES! YES! YES!

  13. Re:disappointment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did I get that right? An unattentive commenter mistakes an Indian satellite for a North Korean ICBM?
    Doesn't anybody screen these postss?

  14. No, you're just blind by Respawner · · Score: 1

    The article said INDIA ... I thought the headline said "Indian Satellite Lost in Launch Explosion", thus the missile ("The Agni-III surface-to-surface missile crashed into the Bay of Bengal."(from article)) must be an INDIAN missile is indeed, from what I understand, you must imply that : A) only North Korea is using missiles B) The rest of the world does not have an arsenal of ICBM (or other) long-ranged missiles C) Yes, that does include the USA, Russia, -insert-your-country-here- , ... D) Basic reading is hard, yet replying is easy have a nice day :x

    1. Re:No, you're just blind by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1
      heh... When reading other places I might be able to draw such conclusions from headlines and articles summaries, but this is Slashdot. As others have noted, the Indian ICBM test received little publicity and was overshadowed. Of course, I have no excuse for failing to read the article thoroughly.

      "you must imply that"
      You meant "infer", I'm sure.
      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  15. Maybe they should have.... by babasc · · Score: 1

    loaded it up with thousands of cups and strings.

    1. Re:Maybe they should have.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.
      "Space? Why would we want it to reach space? The Jet-Assisted Dispersal Module performed flawlessly. I bet some of those units made it several kilometers."

  16. Re:well (Wrong) by ZSpade · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Outsourced the shuttle to a private company
    Nasa is looking to outsource even more!
    The article title made me laugh in light of your comment.

    Like almost every other branch of the government, NASA does outsource. They contract out the building of almost any sort of vehicle out to private companies who are all competing for it.

    Now if you think I'm just picking apart your statement for fun, you're only half right, look at this:

    In light of this article, scary.

    --
    Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
  17. This was not a troll! by mmell · · Score: 1
    The parent is right - "rockets is hard."

    In all the history of rocketry, the successes are actually outnumbered by the failures. That's how we got this far.

    Maybe someday, rocketry will be as reliable as, say, telephony or jet travel; but for now, it's an incredibly risky affair.

    Somebody mod the parent up, please.

  18. Re:disappointment? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yep, it didnt get much press, guess no one cared since it was a "friendly" country testing this time.

    Some animals are more equal than others.

  19. You were talking like it was the end of the world by Rheingold · · Score: 4, Interesting
    --
    Wil
    wiki
  20. It's ok by me by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was a communications satellite, right? Anything that limits the possibility of my tech support calls getting routed to India is just fine by me.

  21. You know, there are protocols. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I know, India (and other countries in the region) follow well established _protocols_ to let the other countries know of their planned tests of missiles well in advance.

    Nice try though.

    1. Re:You know, there are protocols. by LearnToSpell · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      *snort*

      What do you think the US reaction would be if NK asked if they could do an ICBM test?

      India and Pakistan having nukes is a fuck of a lot scarier to me than Korea having them.

    2. Re:You know, there are protocols. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't ask, you _notify_. As sorry as that is, them's the facts. :)

    3. Re:You know, there are protocols. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there are many countries who don't like the idea of the U.S having nukes. Being the only country that has ever used it and has more will to attack more countries (those that are not even a threat to it).

  22. GSLV exploded... by dracken · · Score: 5, Informative

    The GSLV had 2 successful launches before, launching the GSAT experimental satellite and the EDUSAT educational satellite. India's moon mission is unmanned and will use the PSLV rocket which has had six successful launches so far.

  23. Unfortunate Coincidence? by CodeMasterPhilzar · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the article, it appears the two rockets were different designs/models, and launched from different sites. So probably no correlation there... Still, I'll bet there are lots of engineering types losing sleep over there right now.

    They have had 12 successful commercial launches in a row, a good record. But now they're 0 for 2 in their last to big launch attempts.

    Note to self, stay out of the Bay of Bengal when they're launching. ;-)

    --
    --- Just another Code-Monkey
    1. Re:Unfortunate Coincidence? by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I could not work out why we are supposed to be disapointed by the Korean failure...

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    2. Re:Unfortunate Coincidence? by CodeMasterPhilzar · · Score: 1
      Well it all depends on your viewpoint.

      Putting on a strictly nationalistic hat I'd say I'm glad it failed. After all, who wants to be threatened by yet another unstable egotistical maniac with ICBMs and WMD?

      Stepping back a bit though I might be disappointed because critics of the Missile Defense System will use this (shortsightedly IMHO) to say we don't need one. I'd contend that by the time we need a missile defense, it's too late to start building it.

      Finally, being entirely selfish about it, some might be disappointed because they wanted a NK success to "scare the h*ll out of" everybody. That might increase the push/urgency (ie. funding) for projects that would benefit some congressmen/women's districts, defense contractors, make the Administration look good/prescient, etc. etc.

      In the end, good bad or indifferent, it's up to you.

      --
      --- Just another Code-Monkey
  24. Great movie! by PreDefined · · Score: 1

    Snagged it at my local video store when they were throwing out old stock.

    I'm surprised no one else has responded to you.

  25. Failure but impressive record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Even though this launch failed, I would think the Indian Space Research OPrganizaiton is doing a tremendous job. Given their meagre budget ($700 million ISRO Wiki ) , their past record is definitely impressive . Most of their launches so far have been in polar orbits (remote sensing and spy satellites). They used ESA's Ariane rockets till yesterday for their geostationary communication satellite requirements.

  26. In other news... by lelitsch · · Score: 5, Funny

    There was a small, secret "hey, our new invisible space-based laser has worked three times in a row now" party at Vandenberg AFB.

  27. The reason people live on a dollar a day there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is because it only takes 25 a day to live there. Things cost less there. The rest goes towards fun, mirth and glee.

  28. Well, when it comes to exploding rockets, by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're a better bomb than I, Gunga Din.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  29. is this the rocket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Excuse me...I was looking for the new, long-awaited "Rocketboom" video, but it appears I am in the wrong thread.

    Oh wait...........

  30. Sure it's not trivial. by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The stresses involved are gigantic and the tolerences are therefore extremely narrow. That alone does not make rocketry a trivial task - assuming that you use a rocket for these sorts of things. (It's entirely possible to replace the first stage of any rocket with some sort of assisted ramjet. Ramjets aren't trivial either, but they allow much wider tolerences and use less fuel. All you have to do is get airflow to 400mph - a gas cannon or adding a high-speed fan to the ramjet is quite sufficient to do this.)


    Assuming you do want to go 100% rocket, though, you'd obviously want to over-engineer the rocket as much as you can. Instead of building a rocket that can just handle what you'd expect, you want to build a rocket that has a wider margin of safety. You'd probably want to launch a whole bunch of rockets laced with sensors to figure out just how wide the margins need to be.


    You'd also want to have something that self-corrects. Having rockets self-destruct on you is expensive. If a rocket flies off-course, then it would seem likely to be the guidance system or the rocket nozzle. Backup guidance systems would seem cheaper than new rockets, even allowing for the fact that the extra weight will require more fuel. (I'm sure plenty of top-of-the-line rockets do, in fact, have such backups - it's just not very likely that too many budget launchers do.) A backup nozzle would be tougher, but not impossible - it's just a question of symmetry. Even if you can't self-correct, having a means of ejecting the payload safely so you can recover it and try again is a damn-sight cheaper than rebuilding such modules from scratch.


    Of course, rocket scientists aren't stupid. Often underfunded for what they try to do, yes, and in an economy that emphasises cheapness over quality, shortcuts are inevitable. The Russians seem to prefer recycled ICBMs over their Soyuz systems, even though the Soyuz seems to be a lot better built, can certainly carry more, are probably newer, and probably carry fuel that is fresher. Why? Because the missiles are cheap and they've got plenty they can waste. They're not being used for anything else and they're already built, so there's almost no cost in refurnishing them.


    India really doesn't have many half-decayed rockets, but the problems come from the same cause - very little money being spent to complete a very difficult task, in the knowledge that this is money they'd need to burn on rocket R&D anyway, if their nukes are to be useful. They're getting paid to do the stuff they'd have to do anyway. The telecos can't really afford to go elsewhere, so they've a captive market that has no practical alternative but to buy their products. They have every reason to experiment, play with ideas, try things out, and none at all to build something that's reliable out of the box.


    (Experimentation is great, when it comes to new tech, but it should be done honestly and not at the expense of customers. And in this case, where pure rocket solutions are not regarded as particularly a good way to do things, it's experimentation in technology that has no value. We're at the point where newcomers to space rocketry using rockets for the first stage are being as sensible as corporations hacking the CERN webserver to run on CP/M, and getting CP/M to run on a PDP-8. Neat, sort-of, but utterly pointless and far from the neatest thing you could do with the same amount of effort.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  31. Mumbai by bobbo69 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Offtopic I know, but just wanted to say my thoughts are with India after the bombings today. Fucking terrorists :(

    1. Re:Mumbai by dvNull · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thanks.

      As an Indian living in the US, it was quite a morning for me as I tried to get in touch with relatives in Mumbai to make sure that they are all right.

      Kind of scary too, as when I am in Mumbai I almost always take the trains there.

    2. Re:Mumbai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      According to news, 6 million people take the train each day in Mumbai, and about 170 of them were killed yesterday. That is about .003%

      When taken over one month period, that is about the same lethality as you can expect from car traffic.

      Don't overhype the effects of terrorism. That is what the terrorists are after. By overhyping it, you are only helping them.

    3. Re:Mumbai by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    4. Re:Mumbai by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

      Glad to hear that you and yours are ok. I saw this post while meta-modding and wanted to wish all the best to those impacted by this attack.

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  32. hypocrite by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I would laugh, but then I'm American...

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  33. Re:India keep wasting money in pissing contests by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, military applications aside, the truth of the matter is that satellites of all kinds have had a tremendous positive impact on economies and populations the world over. Communications, weather-monitoring, resource exploitation, scientific research ... no, I can't fault India for trying to use near-space to its advantage. Why not ... everyone else is. Besides, if you want to alleviate issues of social networking and education (two big steps towards improving living conditions in general) advanced communications are important. Satellite technology is one way to get that, and given the size and population of India, I would rather think that building out surface infrastructure would be prohibitively expensive, at least in the near term. Hell, it took the United States decades and billions of dollars to put a phone in every house, and I don't think India wants to wait that long.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  34. Airborne Laser by p51d007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm surprised the tinfoil hats haven't said it was the U.S. Military using the airborne laser weapon LOL. http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/abl/

    1. Re:Airborne Laser by mrxak · · Score: 1

      I had considered it, to tell you the truth. After all, surely we did the same thing on North Korea's missile...

      But if you really think about it, India is sort of our ally now, what with the nuclear secrets sharing thing. It would make a lot more sense for Pakistan to try to shoot it down somehow than for the US to do so.

    2. Re:Airborne Laser by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      It would make a lot more sense for Pakistan to try to shoot it down somehow than for the US to do so.

      Or it could be the satellite launching industry's equivelence of hijacking a truckload of cigarettes while offering a more "reliable and secure" service. Damn, Good Fellas is moving into space.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Airborne Laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, also, it's fairly easily explained what went wrong. The stages didn't separate right and ground control detonated it when it went off-course.

  35. Re:disappointment? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    Fear sells more papers.

    It is not that the media is trying to mislead the public. It is not that the media thinks some people are "more equal" than others. It just the invitable result of human nature, capitalism, and journalism combined.

    But please, if you can find a way to get popular media to provide a more complete picture of the world; and you can do it without violating freedom of speach, PLEASE SHARE!

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  36. Re:disappointment? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

    That's a great book.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  37. Re:disappointment? by praksys · · Score: 1

    Are you suggesting that a democratic nation, which has a good record of treating its own citizens well and abiding by international law *should* be considered equal with the most barbaric totalitarian dictatorship on the planet - a nightmare of a country that starves its own citizens, gases them, kidnaps citizens from other countries, carries out terrorist attacks on its neighbours, and regularly threatens to nuke them?

  38. Re:disappointment? by orkysoft · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's not a book, it's a quote from a book. You should read your own sig again.

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  39. If it were easy... by obnoxiousbastard · · Score: 1

    I would have my own satellite and launch my own interplanetary probes since NASA is trying to relive the 1960s.

    Damned hippies in the White House. Shouldn't they have sobered up by now?

    --
    Is that a SCSI connector or are you just glad to see me?
  40. Maybe NASA should outsource... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    NASA seems to loose more launch vehicles, and definitely more people, per launch than anyone else

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Maybe NASA should outsource... by ThreeE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No manned launch vehicle is more reliable than the shuttle. 114 out of 115 successful launches. 113 out of 114 successful re-entries.

      Most people in the industry consider the shuttle the most advanced manned vehicle ever. It certainly has capabilities unavailable in any other vehicle.

    2. Re:Maybe NASA should outsource... by jelle · · Score: 1

      "No manned launch vehicle is more reliable than the shuttle. 114 out of 115 successful launches. 113 out of 114 successful re-entries."

      The shuttle is extremely impressive, and nothing even compares in its combination of reliability, manned launch, and impressive cargo capacity, but to state that 'no manned launch vehicle is more reliable' is debatable: Soyuz, the craft that picked up the slack to ferry up the crews when the shuttle was grounded, has a pretty impressive track record itself.

      100 manned flights, no astronaut died.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_programme

      And: "The only blemish on the record: A 1983 incident in which a fire at the pad forced the cosmonauts to fire their emergency escape rocket and blast free of the area before the Soyuz exploded"

      http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/soyuz_launch_ 021029.html

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    3. Re:Maybe NASA should outsource... by ThreeE · · Score: 0
      100 manned flights, no astronaut died.

      I assume you are joking, because all of the cosmonauts died on Soyuz 1 and Soyuz 11. No astronauts, true, but cosmonauts yes. There have been other accidents as well -- most notably a large casualty accident on the pad.

    4. Re:Maybe NASA should outsource... by jelle · · Score: 1

      "I assume you are joking, because all of the cosmonauts died on Soyuz 1 and Soyuz 11. No astronauts, true, but cosmonauts yes. There have been other accidents as well -- most notably a large casualty accident on the pad."

      I was not joking. I was obviously misinformed...

      Hmm, interesting that the space.com article I linked to does not mention that at all, even says "The only blemish on the record", about an incident in 1983 where nobody died.

      Maybe it's only the Soyuz-FG booster rocket that has a good reliability record, but not when combined with crew capsule (landings...) and (?) launch pad?

      Or maybe the initial problems are considered fixed, since since then it has been performing much better? (soyuz 11 was 1971, ten years before the first shuttle launch)...

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  41. Wow by wigginz · · Score: 1

    Talk about yer bad week... what else can go wrong for India this week? Ugh, and it's only Tuesday.

    --
    You may find my appearance and demeanor foolish, but it is you who plays the fool.
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.. it's been a terrible week for India. Isn't it? With satellite launches failing, and now this.. (in case you're wondering what I am talking about.. its the bomb blasts you moron)

    2. Re:Wow by nick1000 · · Score: 1
      There's nothing "Wow" in that, but yes it definitely seems to be a bad week for India.

      Also GSLV and the IRBM are separate programs under separate organsations.


      GSLV is a civilian program under the Indian Space Reseach Organisation(ISRO), while the Agni-III (IRBM) program is a defense project under the Defense Research and Development Organisation (DRDO). And one more thing is that the Indian engineers don't have one big convention where all engineers from different parts of India come together to express their disappointment over the failures.

  42. don't worry, we're still a developing country by t35t0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    we'll get it right eventually. The US didn't get it right the first couple of times either.

    1. Re:don't worry, we're still a developing country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half your countrymen live on less than $1 a day, maybe they should be focusing on that instead of wasting resources on playing with moon rockets. Besides, if that rocket flies anything like they way they drive in India it's not likely ot make it there anyway.

    2. Re:don't worry, we're still a developing country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but after they launch objects into space a thousand times we'll take them seriously and dump bucket loads of money onto their border for them to feed their citizenry with. World power, baby! World power! India! India! India! Look at Rusia, they can launch things into space and their citizenry is fat and happy! India! India! India!

    3. Re:don't worry, we're still a developing country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just what makes you think poverty alleviation and a viable space program are mutually exclusive? Atleast for India, they are not. Several of the satellites that India built indigenously are being used for teleeducation, telemedicine in the remotest and poorest regions of India. Check this article:
      http://www.isro.org/newsletters/spaceindia/janmar2 004/webpgs/pg06.htm

      India did not start its space program for one-upmanship with other countres. We are trying solve huge problems that still exist in our country and our space program is geared to provide a technological base for that.

    4. Re:don't worry, we're still a developing country by aimlesswanderer666 · · Score: 1

      Get your facts right. The current %age of population living below "poverty line" is 26% according to the census in 2001 (http://in.rediff.com/money/2005/apr/16guest.htm). We all know how much has changed since then. I won't be surprised if its hovering below 25% in 2006. A far cry from your head-in-butt 50%. Moreover, exchange rate is not the only indicative of living standards. I can easily afford a far better lifestyle (maids + chauffeurs + gardeners + cooks etc) in India for a 80K/month salary that I cannot get in US for an 80K/year salary. Sucks, isn't it? ./h

  43. Re:India keep wasting money in pissing contests by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    Well, military applications aside, the truth of the matter is that satellites of all kinds have had a tremendous positive impact on economies and populations the world over.

    Why put military applications aside? Orbital guidance and communications systems have allowed western militaries to put one bomb on one "safe house" where we used to have send in a battalion of soldiers for a protracted firefight. Or used to have to pave over the whole town with bombs.

    Being able to precisely target things has turned into a bigger deterrent than the old strategic nukes. Doesn't help with some guy carrying a backpack bomb into a market square, but that's a different problem (unless we got his boss in the safe house earlier).

    And, of course, when the Navy rolls into a giant tsunami diasaster area, it's space-based imaging and comms that make them able to move as quick as they do.

    Anyway - military apps aren't bad, just because the word "military" is in the phrase.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  44. Re:disappointment? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

    I was of course refering to the book that the quote came from, obviously the quote is not a title.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  45. Follow up by allden · · Score: 2, Informative

    Link to the interview with G Madhavan Nair, Chairman of Indian Space Research Organisation. http://indianexpress.com/story/8316.html

  46. No Malfunctioning Star Wars Orbital Laser by arthurpaliden · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually it is an old Star Wars Orbital Laser from the Regan years. Unfortunately it has been malfunctioning for years and the U.S. still cannot get control of it to turn off its automatic targeting and firing mode. It has already shot down two shuttles, several air liners and a few other missiles. Three in the last few days.

  47. $591.2B 1996 USD by ThreeE · · Score: 0

    NASA was created around 1958. It's 2006. That's what, 48 years? In fact, wikipedia gives NASA's budget from 1958-2005 -- it adds up to $591.2B 1996 USD.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_budget

    Quite a bit less than TRILLIONS.

    Having said that, they do need to change the way they do things.

  48. This is a (nazi) troll by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

    Err ... rockets are hard. Rocketry is hard.

    Just sayin' :p.

    1. Re:This is a (nazi) troll by Morky · · Score: 1

      Err, you might want to consider reading a quick primer on humor.

  49. Re:India keep wasting money in pissing contests by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Oh, I agree ... I was just trying to point out that investment in space isn't intrinsically wasteful, even if you're a nation with a lot of poor people.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  50. tuzhya bhainila me zhavla. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aa aaighalya. Lavda tondat gheoon chokhat bas.

    tuzhya aai chi pucchi. :) just kidding.... not.

  51. It is a non-event because ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know where to start. Let's see:

    1) India is a sovereign country. Enough said.

    2) India lets all its neighbours know of the missile tests in advance.

    3) India is a democracy, unlike its neighburs. Enough said.

    4) India has a no-first use policy as far as Nukular Weapons are concerned.

    5) India has enough (internal) things to worry about. "War on Terror" anyone?

    You know, for all the high IQs around here, I am disappointed.

  52. Re:well (Wrong) by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

    Now if you think I'm just picking apart your statement for fun, you're only half right, look at this:
    [indiadaily.com]
    In light of this article, scary.


    Yes, those brackets can be scary sometimes.

    [[[indiadaily.com]]]

    AIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

  53. it dint just explode.. by vasanth · · Score: 5, Informative

    the satellite dint just explode but was made to explode when its path deviate from the intended one... thats a big difference.. http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?id=398107 "Following this, the vehicle deviated to about 10 degrees, leading to the mission control giving the 'destruct command'."

    1. Re:it dint just explode.. by starbird · · Score: 1

      The reason the rocket went off course in the first place is that the first stage didn't seperate completely. When the 2nd stage ignited, the rocket deviated from its intended course.

      There have been a lot of problems with stages not staging correctly over the years.

    2. Re:it dint just explode.. by ISROBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was born and bought up in the place where the launch took place , My sister is part of the team to give the "Remote" destruct command .1 of the strap on boosters out of the 4 failed during the 1st 60secs of the flight which lead to unstable overall structure . These things happen in this field and eventually ISRO will get right remember ISRO is using idegenious cryogenic engines for the first time . EVERYTHING IS FINE WITH INDIAN SPACE PROGRAM

  54. Poor taste? by big_debacle · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is it just me or is the timing of this article in somewhat poor taste in light of the train bombings?

    I know it happened, and no correlation between the two is being drawn, but come on...

    There are over 140 dead in a terrorist attack in Mumbia and we get info on a failed rocket?

    Slashdot used to be "Stuff that matters" and not just "News for nerds."

  55. Re:disappointment? by grapeape · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course I dont see them as equal as far as relations with most of the world. However, with the sabre rattling that India and Pakistan have engaged in over the past couple years, im not real thrilled about either of them having Nukes either. Its been relatively quiet lately but it was only a short while ago that their bickering was quickly elevating to complete lunacy.

  56. How many missed the bit about BALLISTIC MISSILE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. This launch failure was preceded by a long-range ballistic missile failure as well. Pakistan must have been surprised that there was no indignant cry of outrage at such a blatant flexing of muscle ... but of course no country of any importance could have been hit with it unlike North Korea's blatant yah-dah, yah-dah.

  57. Not to belittle India but... by MMaestro · · Score: 1
    India got into the game fairly late in comparison to the U.S. let alone the U.S.S.R./Russia. From your own link:

    It was not until 1992 that the first successful launch of the ASLV took place. At this point the launch vehicle, which could only put very small payloads into orbit, had achieved its objective.

    The program starts in the '60s and only launches its first satellite in the '90s? Good for them, but at that rate the U.S. will be sending people to Mars and Russia will have Mir 2 by the time they start sending people up into space.

    1. Re:Not to belittle India but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you want to name a country that takes bold steps forward into developing manned space traffic, I would not think the U.S. is the best example...

      They are spending most of their time worrying about foam.
      Where is the shiny new manned spacecraft that will replace the shuttle in 2010?

  58. Re:India keep wasting money in pissing contests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I can't fault India for trying to use near-space to its advantage"

    Actually India has mastered the near-space space (ref PSLV comments above). Its trying to master geosync space (~36,000 kms) (GSLV) and further....

  59. Stop crying. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is a site for technology-oriented news. You can go to any other news site for news on the train bombing.

    Yes, it's a shame that lives were lost. But it's not material for this website.

    1. Re:Stop crying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Is it,

      so what is this doing on slashdot?

      http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/ 07/121258

      Please don't make stupid excuses.

      Also, I am sure, 9/11 and Madrid and many other blast were on Slashdot... I just don't want to waste time finding the links to state the obvious.

      SO who should stop crying now?

    2. Re:Stop crying. by big_debacle · · Score: 1

      You mean like the stories on the train bombings in London? http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/ 121258

      Or the stories on Anime?
      http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/0 9/17/1615206

      The Hitchhiker's Guide?
      http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/0 4/14/179249

      Perhaps a tabletop game?
      http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/16/ 1549200

      Or roleplaying?
      http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/08/ 0739233

      Or a softdrink?
      http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/08/ 0739233

      Comedy?
      http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/ 30/1918204

      Get a clue and open your eyes. STUFF THAT MATTERS. To imply that this isn't stuff for this website shows a lack of familiarity with this website and what it covers.

      Or maybe I'm wrong and it doesn't matter...it was just some probably outsourcers anyway, right?

    3. Re:Stop crying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lives lost in Mumbai are not as important as those lost in London.

      Sad.

  60. probable cause of the accident by RelliK · · Score: 3, Funny

    The engineers called tech support while assembling the rocket but couldn't quite understand the accent.

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  61. NASA's job is outsourcing by dangermouse · · Score: 3, Informative
    NASA is made for outsourcing. That's partly the point of NASA. It's as much about driving the strategic American aerospace industry as it is about conducting research and space flight missions for their own sake.

    From the National Aeronautics and Space Act, which established NASA:

    (d) The aeronautical and space activities of the United States shall be conducted so as to contribute materially to one or more of the following objectives:

    ...

    (5) The preservation of the role of the United States as a leader in aeronautical and space science and technology and in the application thereof to the conduct of peaceful activities within and outside the atmosphere;

    ...

    (9) The preservation of the United States preeminent position in aeronautics and space through research and technology development related to associated manufacturing processes.

    1. Re:NASA's job is outsourcing by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      Well duh, it's not like NASA has phds in a machine shop turning out turbines for a rocket motor. It is common sense that they 'outsource'.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
  62. Re:disappointment? by ArghBlarg · · Score: 1

    Hey, keep the USA out of this :-p /me ducks

    --
    ERROR 144 - REBOOT ?
  63. What? Poor taste? by Valacosa · · Score: 1
    Is it just me or is the timing of this article in somewhat poor taste in light of the train bombings?

    I know it happened, and no correlation between the two is being drawn, but come on...

    There are over 140 dead in a terrorist attack in Mumbia and we get info on a failed rocket?

    So, what are you saying? No website should post news coming out of India because of an unrelated terrorist attack? What exactly is your logic here?
    --
    "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
    1. Re:What? Poor taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The logic:

      1. You could lead with the train bombings as a story with more immediate impact.
      2. You could at least acknowledge the train bombings.
      3. You have life impacting explosions in India and you run the story about sattelite launch explosions. There's a certain juxtoposition here that is somewhat unsettling.
      4. The story is over 24 hours old when posted.
      5. Slashdot routinely covers US or UK based tradgedies (i.e. 9/11 or the London tube bombings)

  64. Re:Stale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is so true though. I think digg is way better than slashdot. what do you guys think?

  65. Animals???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, rest of the World are Animals for Americans.. fuck you pig. No wonder the world hates America.

  66. Damn Desmond, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did you forget to enter those numbers *AGAIN* ?!?
    You're turning this island in a junkyard!

  67. Re:well (Wrong) by kgskgs · · Score: 1

    Why this has to go to outsourcing? Why can't this stay focused on good technical discussion? There is India beyond outsourcing and tech support.
    About nationalistic pride and stuff, some of our countrymen tend to err little on pride side. But hey, the world looks different when your country and your race and your religion are not dominating the world.
    -- Back to my transcendental meditation.

  68. Re:well (Wrong) by fbjon · · Score: 1
    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  69. Re:Better phone service? by ramnishkalsi · · Score: 1

    Sadly and thankfully, its not up to you.. *Runs to the corner and chuckles*

  70. Props? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your idea for a propeller-powered launcher intrigues me.

  71. You're right, those didn't belong here either. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    I think those stories didn't belong either.

  72. Hardly suprising.. by Mark+Gillespie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If it was built by Indians, i'm surpised it even made it off the launchpad...

    1. Re:Hardly suprising.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If it was built by Indians, i'm surpised it even made it off the launchpad...


      yeah right, without these stupid indians, europeans and americans would have advanced to the XXII nd century by now, insetad of being stuck in year MMVII
  73. Re:well (Wrong) by freakxx · · Score: 1

    if we see the past records, there also india have had some failures in the first one or two launches when they tried some new rockets...but soon after that, in next one or two launches they corrected the problem and now those technologies are working well (e.g. PSLV). This time also, they are trying something new and so few initial failiures are understandable. Soon in the one or two next launches they are going to correct the problem. Not only India, rather other countries also have had such failures...NASA's rockets, everyone knows about the disaster when the the guys were returning from the space station and the shuttle burnt away as soon as they entered into Earth's atmosphare, China's rocket launches...Japan's rocket launches are a complete failure till now...etc etc. Failures are acceptable in test phase and that is why they are called "test"!! :-) hail India!!

  74. Troll or Unread? by BancBoy · · Score: 1

    Animal Farm, no? Geez, pick up a book.

    --
    [UID-HeinzIntel]
  75. Why is Korea bashed for missile testing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't India do the same according to the article?

  76. Re:well (Wrong) by ZSpade · · Score: 1

    thankyou. Teaches me not to preview my messages.

    --
    Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
  77. So where is it? by Rezen8r · · Score: 1

    "The satellite, designed to enhance India's telephone and communications network, was lost when the rocket carrying it veered off course"

    Is there any chance the poor little lost satellite will be found somewhere, maybe beeping in somebody's back yard?

  78. That caught my eye too... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    ...if India's fueding with Pakistan, WTF do they need a long range missle for? To hit people far away, obviously...people like Europe, Russia, and The US. Are they going to start shaking us down for handouts like Iran and South Korea?

    Maybe they just are sick of Americans on the tech support lines abusing them because of their accents.

  79. Re:How many missed the bit about BALLISTIC MISSILE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  80. Re:Indian Astronauts-had to say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing to see here. Please move along.

    Sorry. Had to.

  81. Re:well (Wrong) by multisync · · Score: 1
    thankyou. Teaches me not to preview my messages.


    Shouldn't that be:

    "Teaches me to preview my messages"?
    --
    I don't care why you're posting AC
  82. What's NASA going to do now? by heroine · · Score: 1

    India is supposed to launch all of NASA's moon probes under the "vision for space exploraration" but clearly their solid fueled rocket is almost as unreliable as the space shuttle. What are they going to do now, hire Americans to launch their moon probes?

  83. Re:How many missed the bit about BALLISTIC MISSILE by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    "Rejecting any comparison of the two, the Bush administration has underscored the stark contrast between the Indian and North Korean ventures. New Delhi, it noted, went about its test in a "transparent and non-threatening" way, while Pyongyang defied neighbours and fired missiles as a provocation without warning." What a bunch of horseshit. Why would anybody test a nuke delivery system if not to scream to the world "DONT FUCK WITH ME! I'LL KILL YOU ALL! BAAAAAAHAHAHAHAH!"

  84. The satellite was destroyed by lovesinghal · · Score: 1

    It is not mentioned much in news, but the satellite was destroyed by security officer present there after the satellite veered off its trajectory. This was done to save possible loss of life in heavily populated regions near the launch site.
    http://www.playfuls.com/news_001546_India_destroys _its_own_satellite_in_air_to_prevent_ground_deaths .html

  85. Re:well (Wrong) by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

    That explains a lot about the fate of some recent NASA ventures.

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  86. Trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's where the pig comes from

  87. point of view by ePharaoh · · Score: 1
    Frankly there are many more interesting places on Earth I haven'tseen yet..
    What is more important? The place or the point-of-view?
    :)