Slashdot Mirror


Blue Screen of Death for Mac OS X

An anonymous reader writes "Possibly nothing in the OS world has as much of a bad rap as the infamous BSOD (blue screen of death) in Microsoft Windows. On the other hand Apple hides the ugly kernel panics behind a nice looking GUI which only tells you its time to restart your dead system. Interestingly Mac OS X kernel has a secret API which lets you decide what your kernel panics are going to look like! In this Mac OS X Internals article Amit Singh explains how to use this API. Apparently you can upload custom panic images into the kernel and there's even a way to test these images by causing a fake panic. The article also shows the ultimate joke is to upload an actual BSOD image for authentic Windows looking panics right inside of OS X."

349 comments

  1. Not like Microsoft invented it... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not like Microsoft invented it, either. I remember these quite unfondly. Before that I had a frozen screen on a C64. And before that I had stopped lights on the PDP-11 display. And before that we had random characters all over the screen of Ohio Scientific (OSI) computers.

    But Microsoft is widely credited with perfecting the BSoD and giving it fame.

    A system crash with a tasteful little box can be as easily dispised as all the the preceding. I suppose, like everything Apple is doing these days, they've given it a certain panache and now everybody will want one.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      Better than nothing (Mandrake's kernel panics).

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    2. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by DingerX · · Score: 4, Informative

      Guru meditations were awesome, and I fondly remember that flashing red border.

      But Amiga wasn't first. The Mac "Bomb" preceded it, and was notoriously useless for troubleshooting.

      Still, most Windows XP users haven't seen a BSOD ever. Go ahead and ask them. See, Windows XP solved that. But mysteriously, their power supply is unreliable, and "trips" on the slightest whim.

      You gotta love that. "BSOD is bad for marketing, and most people don't know what to do with the information anyway. Let's just reset the computer and pretend it's a power spike."

      I'd advise people to change their default settings, but one time I had "write memory contents to log file on BSOD" enabled when I was moving data about, and hand less free memory on my HD than in RAM.

      Don't ever, ever do that.

    3. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      But Amiga wasn't first. The Mac "Bomb" preceded it, and was notoriously useless for troubleshooting.

      Now that I think about it, I was in Sacramento, CA, back in the mid-80's and saw an evaluation Atari ST machine in the hands of a developer. He kept getting mushroom clouds. Seems he could get more than one at a time, too.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they didn't invent the CTRL ALT DEL either, but they get much credit:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdGQsBDSEpk

    5. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      IIRC we had BSOD on NetWare first. But then it was the Black Screen Of Death.

    6. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Nuskrad · · Score: 1

      Even with BSOD enabled, I've only seen it in XP a handful of times, usually when something goes wrong with my graphics card. Compare this to Windows ME, when I'd see them upwards of 10 times a week (and for some people, 10 times a day). WinXP is a pretty stable OS, all things considered, very few errors require a system restart.

    7. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      IIRC we had BSOD on NetWare first. But then it was the Black Screen Of Death.

      I just knew we had a problem when nsnipes stopped working

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A system crash with a tasteful little box can be as easily dispised as all the the preceding.

      that is precisely true.

      My machine at work has some kind of hardware problem that was never quite solved while it was under applecare. it "panics" at least once a day, some days, it'll "panic" 5-10 times. Some things that set it off are scrolling in a terminal window (such as when I'm sync'ing portage on our server) or putting an audio CD in the lower optical drive.

      The last time we brought it to tekserve, they claimed that both scsi drives were bad and they replaced them, and we didn't have a panic for a couple months, but by the time they came back (and with a vengence, I might add), there was no more applecare coverage...

      I quote "panic" because sometimes I get that nice pretty "please restart your computer" screen, sometimes I get the text dump on the desktop, and sometimes the machine locks up, altogether.

      luckily, we're getting one of those nice quad-xeon machines as soon as adobe releases the new creative suite, at which point I'll throw this machine out of a window.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    9. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      It's not like Microsoft invented it, either.

      Microsoft had a single DEBUG line in the registry for Windows 95 -- it allowed the application of your choice to intercept the crash.

      The first commercially successful program to implement it was "Power Utilities 95 with Crashproof" that handled/exposed many hardware conflict sins without just covering them up.

      About 50K copies later and good shelf space at Frys/COMPUSA/BestBuy , Symantec took notice and put out their $29 Crashproofing program that didn't perform dozens of system checks or even unmask the cause of the crash.

      If version 1.0 of that Norton floppy disk consisted of anything more than copying a 1 line registry change and a pointer to a bitmap, then it never showed in practice.

    10. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by nuklearfusion · · Score: 1
      Still, most Windows XP users haven't seen a BSOD ever. Go ahead and ask them. See, Windows XP solved that. But mysteriously, their power supply is unreliable, and "trips" on the slightest whim.

      Actually, i have, a few times. unfortuntly, the screen does not stay up long enough to actually read what it says (thus the cluckey PS comment, i assume.) i had to find out from the Windows recovery disc that the filesystem was currupted (thank god for knoppix, which still read the system.)

      --

      There's no such thing as a stupid question, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots.

    11. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

      Well, I can tell you right now, don't use SCSI. It's an old technology, most of the adapters suck, bad, and if you want speed, a Firewire 800 drive, or an eSATA with a new Mac or a SATA card is pretty damn fast.

      But, we Must Use SCSI. Papa Love SCSI. All the children do, too!

    12. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by shaneFalco · · Score: 1

      In my experience- panics come at you mostly from bad RAM and bad power supplies- might want to look into those.

    13. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, MS didn't invent it. They just perfected it. Remember when there was talk about adding a BSOD hotkey to the MS keyboard, so you wouldn't have to go through the hassle of running software to get it?

    14. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I take it you don't run any servers. SCSI is vastly superior to SATA in a server role. SATA is better for single user work, but if you are tossing many file read/writes at the same time at the drive, SCSI will simply way out preform SATA.

    15. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by sgt_doom · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Excuse me....excuse me....EXCUSE ME....it so happens Mac invented everything...get with the program.....(well, except for that paper tape bootstrap loader on the PDP-11....)

      21st Century Reading List:

      Blood Money, by T. Christian Miller, Hostile Takeover by David Sirota, The Bush Agenda by Antonia Juhasz, Armed Madhouse by Greg Palast, Jacked and also Other People's Money by Nomi Prins, Confessions of an Economic Hitman by John Perkins, No Place To Hide by Robert O'Harrow, What Every American Should Know About Who's Really Running the World by Melissa L. Rossi, American Theocracy by Kevin Phillips, Judas Economy by Wolman and Colamosca, and War is a Racket by
      General Smedley Butler.

    16. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by macshit · · Score: 1

      if you are tossing many file read/writes at the same time at the drive, SCSI will simply way out preform SATA

      Really? Could you describe in more detail?

      I know old ATA was a crap standard, but I thought SATA had corrected many of ATA's problems, and copied a lot of the good stuff from SCSI (e.g., "NCQ" to allow reordering of requests).

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    17. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Windows ME, and 98, and 95 do not have a blue screen of death. There is a blue background crash screen for those 'Operating Environments' but there is near-zero debug information on that screen.

      It is NOT a BSOD.

    18. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I'd advise people to change their default settings, but one time I had "write memory contents to log file on BSOD" enabled when I was moving data about, and hand less free memory on my HD than in RAM.

      I wouldn't trust an option like that to begin with. Something unexplained happened in the kernel - probably memory corruption. In this broken state, are you going to trust the filesystem code to update all those complex data structures correctly? The traditional Unix answer is to write to a dedicated crash partition, which is much simpler. The RedHat answer is to not touch the disk at all - instead, send the data over the network. It's much harder to damage anything while doing that.

    19. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Informative

      SCSI drives have been aimed specifically at the server market for years. Their electronics have been specifically geared towared performance in that area.
      SATA is aimed for desktop systems. Almost no early SATA systems had NCQ, although more and more newer models have it now. It's been tacked on, not central to the design for decades like in SCSI.

      Just take the baddest SATA drive around, the Western Digital Raptor 150. A 10,000 RPM drive with NCQ (Note, the earlier 36 GB and 74 GB Raptor SATA drives did not have NCQ. It's a new tack-on)

      1) Look at it's benchmarks vs a bunch of SCSI drives for single user benchmarks.

      Wow, look. It not only blows away other SATA drives, but kills those expensive SCSI drives. This is why the uninformed grandparent things SCSI is 'ancient' tech.

      2) Now look at it's benchmarks vs a bunch of SCSI drives for multi user benchmarks.

      Notice in the top graph where it slaughters every other SATA drive out there except for it's earlier sibling, the Raptor74. It's obviously pretty much the best SATA has to offer.

      Now look at the next graph where it is compared to those 'Ancient' SCSI drives. Those SCSI drives beat the hell out the piss-poor excuse of NCQ that that high end SATA drive has.

      That's why SCSI is still king for server work.

      I've got a Raptor 150 in my home gaming machine. It's great. But I'd never think about it in my RAIDed servers at work. It just couldn't come close to the job the SCSI drives do.

    20. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by beadfulthings · · Score: 1

      Hah! I knew there had to be somebody around who remembered the Black Screen of Death. Swift and just punishment for loading one's ODI drivers into high memory without thinking carefully about where they might be stashed. I was just thinking I rather liked the image in Figure 4; its darkness pays homage to the original and infamous black screen.

      --
      "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
    21. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The crash dump info is put into the sectors used by the pagefile, stupid. No filesystems involved. It's moved into an actual file when the OS starts the next time, after the fs has been re-mounted safely.

    22. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by kabloom · · Score: 5, Funny

      But Amiga wasn't first. The Mac "Bomb" preceded it, and was notoriously useless for troubleshooting.

      Error: Type 11

      "But I keep typing 11 and nothing's happening"

    23. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Noginbump · · Score: 1

      And before that, your sliderule stuck. And before that, your Da Vinci Calculator: http://www.webcom.com/calc/leonardo/leonardo.html rusted.

      --
      He who questions training, only trains himself at asking questions. -- The Sphinx, Mystery Men
    24. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Windows ME, and 98, and 95 do not have a blue screen of death. There is a blue background crash screen for those 'Operating Environments' but there is near-zero debug information on that screen.

      The blue background crash screen of which you speak is precisely what the vast majority of people (prior to the release of Windows XP) were referring to when they mentioned a Blue Screen Of Death.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    25. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by cp.tar · · Score: 1
      Still, most Windows XP users haven't seen a BSOD ever. Go ahead and ask them. See, Windows XP solved that.

      I've almost seen a BSOD a few times.

      It usually passes by so quickly before the system reboots on its own that I don't have the time to even see what caused the problem (nVidia's drivers, most probably).

      The system just freezes and reboots.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    26. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

      The nice thing about the Amiga GURU is that you could debug the system on the serial port while it was in a GURU state.

      --
      *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    27. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by scottgfx · · Score: 1

      Quote: "A system crash with a tasteful little box can be as easily despised as all the the preceding. I suppose, like everything Apple is doing these days, they've given it a certain panache and now everybody will want one."

      For a short moment I thought you were talking about an Amiga Guru Meditation Error. It was a tasteful little box. It even flashed to warn you. Circa 1985.

      --
      It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
    28. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Power spike conspiracy? Umm yeah. Here's what the XP BSOD looks like. Its real. Sheez, I never thought I would have to defend the BSOD on slashdot.

    29. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

      I think you missed what he was saying. Windows XP defaults to just rebooting the system when a BSOD would be triggered so lots of people don't see the BSOD, their computer just restarts, making it look like a PSU issue :)

    30. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Windows, the pagefile is a plain file, stupid. The filesystem is involved. On older Windows NT systems, the pagefile would even get badly fragmented as it grew and shrank.

    31. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It doesn't matter if a cheerleader kicks you in the balls or if a corner bum does. Either way, it (hurts a fuck of a lot and) pisses you off. Now, your tollerance for the cheerleader might be higher, as she's easier to look at and you've got a perception that by not getting irritated you might get something out of it (or that the prettyness does something for you), but over time they're both going to piss you off roughly as much as the other.

      They don't piss you off because of how they look, they piss you off because they exist in the first place.

      On another note... I've not had a system crash on my WinXP machine now for well over a month - and no restart in that period of time, either. I find this quite fascinating, as it's never happened before (and it's not like I haven't been abusing the system, either).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    32. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by 3vi1 · · Score: 1
      It's not like Microsoft invented it, either.... Before that I had a frozen screen on a C64...

      Yeah, so it must have been invented by whoever wrote the BASIC interpreter that the C64 booted into! If I could only remember what it said at the top of the screen... :P

      (Selectively ignoring PDP-11, since it wasn't a microcomputer...)

      -J

    33. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

      The number of bombs on the ST indicated which error had occurred:

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Row_of_bombs for a list.

    34. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by jacobw · · Score: 1

      "But I keep typing 11 and nothing's happening"

      You know, I think I finally figured out what's going on in that Lost bunker. Hurley's lottery numbers? They're just the universe's error codes.

    35. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Xamataca · · Score: 1

      "Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do. I'm half crazy all for the love of you. It won't be a stylish marriage, I can't afford a carriage. But you'll look sweet upon the seat of a bicycle built for two."

      --
      ***Game Over***Insert Coin***
    36. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've dealt with two machines that had problems that sound identical to yours. In both cases it turned out to be bad L2 cache. The first machine was an ancient PowerMac 9600 with a CPU upgrade and OS X under XPostFacto. It's problems cleared when a utility call CPU Director was used to lower the speed of the cache on the (upgraded) CPU. It's amazing what a great workhorse that old machine was. It had multiple Atlas 10k drives on Ultra-160 SCSI.

      The second machine was a dual-G4. It was old enough to support booting OS 9. After pretty much giving up on finding the source of it's problems, it was set aside. For some reason a user pulled it out and booted it into OS 9. The OS immediately threw up an alert box saying the cache was bad. Nothing like that had ever happened in OS X. OS X has always seemed much better at identifying bad RAM, but it didn't tell us about the cache. I guess sometimes memory faults aren't evident unless a certain pattern occurs around the bad location in memory. The machine had come from a local dealer who'd always claimed it checked out okay. They remembered it and even several years after warranty coverage was over gave us a new CPU daughterboard with cache once we pointed out that error. A bit late, but they get points for doing what felt right.

      We've had far more problems with our Intel and AMD PCs, besides bad memory a number of those machines suffered from failing electrolytic capacitors on the motherboards. I think they were filters in the secondary switching regulators that fed power to the CPU. Between a bad batch made about 3 years ago and the high temperatures around those CPUs, the failure rate was horrible.

    37. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by slughead · · Score: 1

      My machine at work has some kind of hardware problem that was never quite solved while it was under applecare. it "panics" at least once a day, some days, it'll "panic" 5-10 times. Some things that set it off are scrolling in a terminal window (such as when I'm sync'ing portage on our server) or putting an audio CD in the lower optical drive.

      http://www.memtestosx.org/

      SCSI my ass.

    38. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Sketch · · Score: 1

      > The nice thing about the Amiga GURU is that you could debug the system on the serial port while it was in a GURU state.

      Yep. Hit left mouse button to continue, but if you hit the right mouse button it would start a debugger on the seiral port. I found you could often just type "g" (go/continue, I think) and the system would often continue working well enough to save anything important before rebooting.

      --
      -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
    39. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

      There's some secret code that should surround the "11". Try this:

      OMG!!! PONIES!!!!!!11!!!!

      That should do the trick. :P

    40. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Actually, i have, a few times. unfortuntly, the screen does not stay up long enough to actually read what it says (thus the cluckey PS comment, i assume.)

      This is a problem if you've got file system errors, but most of the time Windows can tell you exactly what the problem was after the reboot. The Mac OS does not do this that I've been able to find. But if you allow Windows to report the problem to Microsoft (which there are arguments against), it will then give you a web page telling you what caused your crash and giving basic instructions on how to fix it.

      This is most useful in deducing device driver problems, which are the cause of probably 100% of the few crashes I've had on XP. It's pretty easy to avoid crashes in the future if Windows is telling you straight up that your network card's drivers are the problem. Get new drivers or a new NIC, problem solved.

      But it is true that Windows rarely crashes. Or maybe it's more accurate to say it either never crashes or it always does, but mostly it never does. As most crashes (in my experience) are caused by unsigned drivers, you're either going to have a problem or you're not. But mostly you're not. And if you do, fixing it is usually as simple as just updating the driver.

    41. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell actually did this. Seriously.

      I had a Dell "internet enabled" keyboard back in about 2000, with three buttons for email, homepage and something else. To make these buttons do anything, several extra processes had to be running in Windows. As far as I was concerned these were useless cruft, so I disabled the relevant services, removed user startup programs etc. and disabled them all.

      My computer now booted a little more quickly. And when I pressed any of the three buttons I got an instant BSOD. Of course, I didn't tell my colleagues; I thought they wouldn't be able to resist.

    42. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a cruel trick played on you by Apple. You were really typing '1' and '1', repeatedly.

      You need to order the special keyboard with the '11' key. I believe the drummer from Spinal Tap had one.

    43. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I've been using XP since 2002 (both at home and work) and have never seen either that BSOd or had a problem with a mysterious reboot.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    44. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by bogado · · Score: 1
      "But I keep typing 11 and nothing's happening"


      Well, then you must have typed 11111111111111111111111111111111 and not "11" as asked, please reboot and try again.
      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    45. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "Almost no early SATA systems had NCQ, although more and more newer models have it now. It's been tacked on, not central to the design for decades like in SCSI."

      Tacked on? Sata drives do not support NCQ, but the SATA2 spec does, since SATA and SATA2 each ahve their own specifications, what do you mean tacked on?

    46. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Wrong. The Blue Background Crash screen in NT 4.0 is what the vast majority of people were referring to. Windows 98/ME do not 'crash' to a blue screen. There are error states where a blue-background screen is displayed, they are all warnings that the machine will exit from (press key to continue.) When Windows 95/98/Me crashes, there's no recovery and there's no debug screen. It's just bye-bye.

      It doesn't matter what a bunch of ignorant people say who never ran an 'NT' derived version of Microsoft Windows until XP.

    47. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      SATA2 is an extension/expansion of SATA. It wasn't in the SATA specs. It wasn't central to their design. It has been tacked on. And I do mean 'tacked on'. Which of those two words don't you understand?

      The lack of performance in multi user benchmarks seems to agree with that analysis.

      Got some benchmarks that show how SATA2 is great at multi user work and on par with SCSI? Post em. Otherwise I'll take your post as just SATA(2) fanboy crap. SCSI is built for multi user. SATA(2) is aimed at desktop. With the additional goal of being merely very bad at multi-user rather than horrifically terrible like old ATA drives.

    48. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Error: Type 11

      Shouldn't that be Type -11?

    49. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Wrong. The Blue Background Crash screen in NT 4.0 is what the vast majority of people were referring to.

      I'm sure it's what the vast majority of NT users were referring to, but I think you'll find that a lot more people used Win9x than ever saw NT.

      Windows 98/ME do not 'crash' to a blue screen. There are error states where a blue-background screen is displayed, they are all warnings that the machine will exit from (press key to continue.)

      Just because it says "press any key to continue" doesn't mean the machine will exit from the error. The only error I can think of that actually fits your description is the error you get if you eject a floppy disk while trying to access it. Most of the time, if you see a blue error message on Win9x, your machine is completely hosed and you must reboot. Pressing a key might get you a black screen with the mouse pointer working, but rarely much better than that.

      It doesn't matter what a bunch of ignorant people say who never ran an 'NT' derived version of Microsoft Windows until XP.

      It was precisely that bunch of ignorant people I was referring to when I said most people meant Win9x's error screen when they said BSOD. They may be ignorant, but they outnumber you by a wide margin.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    50. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it... by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "SATA2 is an extension/expansion of SATA".

      Yes that was my point, I guess you agree with me. Are you trying to say that expanding on an original idea is a bad thing? Are you saying their goal was to be merely "very bad"?

      I would agree that someone is suffering from fanboyism.

      I guess you would also say that DDR2's specs are just "tacked on" to DDR eh? OR pentium 4s are tacked on to the original pentiums? or English is just a "tacked on" version of the North Sea Germanic language?

      I wasn't denigrating SCSI, I think SCSI and SATA each have it's own uses and advantages depending on what you use it for, you're the one who seems to be maligning a specification?

      If i had another point and was to make a comparision, it would be between SATA[2] and IDE, which i'm sure everyone can agree is a much fairer comparision and shows what improvements have been made in the way of "desktop" drive technology.

  2. Sort of unrelated by rodgster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sort of unrelated:

    I used to have BSOD as my screen saver for an earlier version of Fedora (IIRC). It was always amusing when people would stop by to chat, a little while later, they'd see my PC suddenly BSOD! The looks I'd see (on other people's faces) makes me laugh just remembering.

    --
    Who will guard the guards?
    1. Re:Sort of unrelated by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I had the screen saver on Solaris on my ultra Sparc. I forgot I choose it and it did a Sun BSOD first my heart skipped a beat I was about to type some commands in the prom. then it turned off the saver.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Sort of unrelated by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Ahh. I remeber that screen saver..circa FC2..good times.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    3. Re:Sort of unrelated by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Sysinternals made a really nice BSoD screensaver for Windows.

    4. Re:Sort of unrelated by Millenniumman · · Score: 0, Troll

      You don't understand, The Windows BSOD is a screensaver. When you can count on your OS to crash every 5 minutes, the kernel panic screen is functionally a screensaver.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    5. Re:Sort of unrelated by ac7xc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There was actually a number complaints about the BSOD and another about kernel panic screen savers that RedHat removed those from screen savers. If you search the fedora-list archives you should find the original emails complaining about it. ;-)

    6. Re:Sort of unrelated by Reverend528 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I used to use that screensaver too. One time, my old roommate accidentally locked my computer. When BSOD came up, he thought it had crashed.

      That's how I discovered he was looking at porn on my computer.

    7. Re:Sort of unrelated by bubkus_jones · · Score: 1

      Heheheheh. I don't have to worry about mine, my roommate's got his own, so I know I'm the only one looking at porn on my computer.

    8. Re:Sort of unrelated by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      At one company, I installed the BSOD screen saver on our NT file server because it amused me.

      Of course, less than an hour later I nearly had a heart attack when I looked up from a big code check-in to see our file server had 'blue-screened'.

      I uninstalled it soon afterwards :-)

      Aside: I seem to remember that the NT 'bouncing lines' screen saver used to halve server performance when it kicked in (genius!), so in the end I went for the boring old 'make the screen go blank' screen saver.

    9. Re:Sort of unrelated by mhore · · Score: 1
      I used to have BSOD as my screen saver for an earlier version of Fedora (IIRC). It was always amusing when people would stop by to chat, a little while later, they'd see my PC suddenly BSOD! The looks I'd see (on other people's faces) makes me laugh just remembering.

      I used to have that screensaver going in X. I actually flipped out once because I got the kernel panic (wasn't thinking) and I was in the middle of something rather important and I just went on about "damn damn damn" in true Life of Brian fashion... only to realize... yes. It was a screensaver.

      (Score:-10, Stupid) for me that day, for sure.

      Mike.

      --

      Mmmm......sacrelicious.

    10. Re:Sort of unrelated by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      Must I use the tags, to ward against ridiculous moderators?

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    11. Re:Sort of unrelated by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      No, that's only a (Score:-6, Stupid). A -10 would be hitting the reset, then realizing it was a screensaver.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  3. Likewise by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Likewise in windows you can change the background color and text color of the BSOD (or at least you could uder 98, I haven't had the desire to play around with it under 2000 / XP since they crash much less frequently).

    1. Re:Likewise by Brother+Dysk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dude, imagine an orange screen of death - your computer crashes: "OH SOD!" Kickarse!

      --
      - Frans.
  4. Let me be the first to say by GungaDan · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new department-wide goatse.cx kernel panic message.

    Any of you guys hiring?

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    1. Re:Let me be the first to say by crashelite · · Score: 1

      new virus re writes code in OS X to show goatse when kernal panic

      --
      (yes i know i suck at spelling fell free to correct my grammar and/or spellin i dont care, im still not going to change
    2. Re:Let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha! So it wasn't just me thinking this whilst reading the summary...

      Good to know.

  5. Well on the upside by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Win32 BSOD does give you better information so you can try to diagnose the problem.

    Which is kinda lacking in the OSX Panic screen.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Well on the upside by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But then MS made the brillant decision to reboot the system right when the BSOD appeared, robbing it of any usefulness. Or perhaps they didn't do it on purpose, but I've seen plenty of displays just go blue for a split second, then blank as the system started rebooting.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    2. Re:Well on the upside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OSX dumps the normal debugging info (I don't know if that includes a core dump, but I would expect so) to disk and gives the option of viewing it when it restarts. I think some of the other BSDs do similar things to help kernel debugging.

      It also means you can save a copy of the stack trace, which isn't possible on Windows unless you have a camera handy.

    3. Re:Well on the upside by fohat · · Score: 1

      It could just be my corp. image, but I have "Automatically Restart" checked under System Properties -> Advanced -> Startup and Recovery. Not sure if it's the default out of the box setting, but I bet I don't see any Blue Screen's with that checked. It will supposedly dump an error log for you in the directory of your choosing, so I guess you don't really have to be able to read the screen; nice if you have a video issue.

      cheers!

      --
      Is there heaven? Is there Hell? Is that a Tuna Melt I smell?-Primus
    4. Re:Well on the upside by RonnyJ · · Score: 1

      Windows 2000 doesn't reboot automatically when a BSOD occurs.

      Windows XP does by default, but can be set not to (Control Panel, System, Advanced, Startup and Recovery).

      A BSOD will also create a memory dump on disk (which can be set to either be a 'minidump', or a complete memory dump).

    5. Re:Well on the upside by mattgreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It gets logged to the system's event log, which you can check out later.

    6. Re:Well on the upside by mybecq · · Score: 5, Funny
      The Win32 BSOD does give you better information so you can try to diagnose the problem.

      Kind of like knowing that there were:
      - 56 bulbs
      - 24 horizontal grill bars
      - 72 vertical ridges on 1600 sq ft of 1/4" steel
      - 20% full gas tank
      - 209,000 miles driven
      - 3 tread patterns
      - 5 axles
      - 18 wheels

      You still got hit by a truck.
    7. Re:Well on the upside by aarku · · Score: 1

      OS X writes out a proper log file you can look at later... what good is showing it when it's crashed?

    8. Re:Well on the upside by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      If you're a developer, you can easily set the boot time arguments to log to the screen. Meanwhile, panic information is logged, so you ca always get at it post-mortem.

      For end users, a bunch of hexadecimal won't mean squat. Telling them to reboot in a non-scary way is a Good Thing.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    9. Re:Well on the upside by shawnce · · Score: 4, Informative

      Kernel panic information gets logged on reboot to a file and you can capture a kernel core dump if you want.

      Review... TN2063, TN2118, Debugging the Kernel, etc.

    10. Re:Well on the upside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you might be unable to boot (happened on my Mandriva box after fiddling with BIOS settings :). So, the error detail might be helpful, if you know what to do with it.

    11. Re:Well on the upside by neokushan · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken, this never happened when XP first came out. Did it change with a Service Pack release or something?

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    12. Re:Well on the upside by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      Because windows users generaly aren't smart enough to find thier log file.

    13. Re:Well on the upside by DigitlDud · · Score: 1

      If you want better information you can open up the crash dump in WinDbg. An "analyze -v" command will give you useful information most of the time.

    14. Re:Well on the upside by boiert · · Score: 1

      Try setting it to do a kernel memory dump and check your %windir% for memory dumps. Then download the symbols and debugger from microsoft and be surprised.

    15. Re:Well on the upside by chrisv · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it's possible on Windows as well. Not that I particularly *like* Windows by any stretch of the imagination, but XP and 2003, at least, will write a memory dump to the system swap file to be copied into %systemroot%\memory.dmp on the following startup, provided that it's configured to do so. The memory dump can then be loaded into a debugger to do post-mortem debugging. It does have a talent for not being the most useful on some configurations - I've run into issues on systems with >2G of memory, generally with the end of the dump file being truncated, but it certainly does save those details for later analysis.

      --

      Dogma: Dead (mostly because your Karma ran it over)

    16. Re:Well on the upside by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      The Win32 BSOD does give you better information so you can try to diagnose the problem. Which is kinda lacking in the OSX Panic screen.

      The OS X panic details get logged to a file, so you can easily get this information in a nice digital form after you've rebooted (or by setting the system into target disk mode). Which, on the plus side, means you don't have to sit and scribble down a bunch of hex and hope that you got in all correct before typing into your system to e-mail to someone for diagnosis.

      Likewise, upon reboot the Mac will realize it had paniced, and will offer to e-mail the details to Apple for analysis.

      Yaz

    17. Re:Well on the upside by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      Then they don't know enough to do anything with the debug information.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    18. Re:Well on the upside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weighing about 40 tons.

      Some information about the system crashing is better than none. I would rather have the machine not crash in the first place but considering that when a machine crashes it is under extreme stress and this is the last thing it can send before it dies so kernel does it best to send what information can about situation caused th crash.
      Like those TV CSI shows, you work with what evidence you have at the crime scene.

    19. Re:Well on the upside by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      Gee, it's soooo hard.
      Starting with Mac OS X 10.2, a panic is indicated by the multi-lingual alert shown in Figure 1. After restarting the system, a file called panic.log should be present in /Library/Logs . This file contains the same data as the panic dump on the screen.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    20. Re:Well on the upside by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Except you usually don't die when you get a BSoD...systems that could kill you usually run something embedded.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    21. Re:Well on the upside by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      The Win32 BSOD does give you better information so you can try to diagnose the problem. Which is kinda lacking in the OSX Panic screen.

      OS X is kind enough to write it down for you, saving you the trouble of copying the information off the screen.

    22. Re:Well on the upside by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      It's not just on corp. XP, "Automatically Restart" is enabled by default in all version of XP (AFAIK). You are correct in that in order to see a blue screen you have to disable it.

    23. Re:Well on the upside by kevmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find it very useful for the rare occasions that I get BSODs anymore to at least know what driver caused the problem. If the BSOD lists something like atixxxxx, then I know that my video card screwed up, and so on. Because almost all of my crashes are caused by driver or hardware problems, its helpful knowing just what that problem is so I can fix the driver or replace the hardware (and thus almost never get crashes on that computer in the future).

    24. Re:Well on the upside by Fulkkari · · Score: 1
      Because almost all of my crashes are caused by driver or hardware problems, its helpful knowing just what that problem is so I can fix the driver or replace the hardware

      Fix the driver? Replace the hardware? Not on a Mac. And besides, OS X does output diagnostics for people like you. It just doesn't show it to the enduser on screen, which is fine. This was the first website I found on kernel panic debugging on OS X if you are interested.

      --
      I demand the Cone of Silence!
    25. Re:Well on the upside by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      But then MS made the brillant decision to reboot the system right when the BSOD appeared, robbing it of any usefulness.

      When my PC hangs, it is useless. The auto-reboot is both configurable and useful in this circumstance. I generally connect in over VNC or Remote Desktop and a lockup would require an international phone call. Give me the auto-reboot any day.

      Also, as said in numerous messages in this topic, 99% of users do not have any use for the BSOD data. For the one 1% that does (e.g. someone with persistant problems), we can turn it off.

    26. Re:Well on the upside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can... spooge on your video card? Really, what are you going to do? Get a different card? Give me a break.

    27. Re:Well on the upside by Pinkybum · · Score: 1

      I agree - my Laptop Blue-screened just this weekend and it was comforting to know that it was the USB driver for my external audio interface that caused it and not some other more critical piece of hardware. Seeing as this is the first time it happened since I got it 8 months ago I think I can live with that frequency of failure.

  6. The world's funniest joke by Malc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hardly the ultimate joke. Jokes are supposed to be original. This has been a screen saver under Linux for years.

    Anyway, couldn't this be described as the ultimate joke?

    1. Re:The world's funniest joke by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
      Jokes are supposed to be original.

      You must be new here.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:The world's funniest joke by Incadenza · · Score: 2, Funny

      You must be new here.

      Jokes are supposed to be original.

    3. Re:The world's funniest joke by fbartho · · Score: 1

      Jokes are supposed to be original.

      Jokes are supposed to be original.

      --
      Gravity Sucks
    4. Re:The world's funniest joke by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, originals are supposed to be a joke!

    5. Re:The world's funniest joke by freakboy9 · · Score: 1

      1. Post old Joke
      2. Repeat
      3. ????
      4. Profit

    6. Re:The world's funniest joke by epsalon · · Score: 1

      In Koera, only old people repeat jokes!

    7. Re:The world's funniest joke by bean123456789 · · Score: 1

      Jokes are supposed to be original.

      That's a great one, thanks I needed a good laugh!

  7. Old Hat by overshoot · · Score: 3, Funny
    Yawn.

    Once upon a time, I was chairing an out-of-town meeting with a roomful of engineers. We spent most of the morning working a spreadsheet with margin calculations on it trying to come up with a margin budget that everyone could live with; I was running the machine that drove the projector.

    The conversation took a turn away from the spreadsheet, and after a bit the BSOD came up onscreen. The panic in the room was palpable -- everyone figured we'd just lost the whole morning, and quite a few had afternoon flights out.

    So I hit the shift key and entered my password to unlock the screen.

    The classic BSOD screensaver gets the same amusement factor without the hassle of hacking OSX.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Old Hat by uuilly · · Score: 1

      This would be a very fitting use for goatse

    2. Re:Old Hat by SillySilly · · Score: 1
      The classic BSOD screensaver gets the same amusement factor without the hassle of hacking OSX.

      And now available as a MacOSX Screensaver module! No hacking necessary! Share and Enjoy!

      XScreenSaver

    3. Re:Old Hat by tonigonenstein · · Score: 1
      The panic in the room was palpable -- everyone figured we'd just lost the whole morning
      Which just shows that engineers never heard of regularly saving their work.
      --
      The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
    4. Re:Old Hat by amchugh · · Score: 1

      I made the mistake of putting the BSOD screensaver on a development server once. My boss panicked and kept resetting the machine every time the screen saver came on until finally she called me and asked me to fix it. I felt pretty stupid.

  8. I have only seen the Screen of Death on OS X only by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Back early on there was a bug in OS X which I think slashdot mentioned that caused a BSOD it required moving a directory into itself. Besides that one time I havn't seen the BSOD. after over 4 years of using my powerbook even doing stuff that it shouldn't be doing.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  9. Not bloated enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great! The OSX kernel wasn't bloated enough! Now we can add images to it...maybe someone could come along and explain how to REMOVE things from the OSX kernel?

    I smell pork rinds and apple sauce...

  10. Leave it to apple! by lostngone · · Score: 3, Funny

    Leave it to Apple to give you a choice when it comes to Panic screens. Does Vista do this yet?

    1. Re:Leave it to apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Leave it to Apple to give you a choice when it comes to Panic screens. Does Vista do this yet?"

      It will once the MS "programmers" hear about this Apple feature.
      (That is, once they get done fixing that darn Windows-DRM vulnerability...)

    2. Re:Leave it to apple! by prophetmike · · Score: 1

      ...maybe they'll add it as yet another "NEW" feature into Vista SP1.

    3. Re:Leave it to apple! by LoveGoblin · · Score: 1

      It did, but they took it out.

  11. Keep it simple by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you have an unstable system (BSOD-worthy), then it is probably best to rely on as few system resources as possible. THis includes GUIs etc. That's why a simple text-based BSOD or oops handler is a better idea than something that tries to do a whole bunch of cute graphics etc (which relies on a whole lot more hardware & software to be working properly).

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Keep it simple by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 5, Funny

      THis includes GUIs etc. That's why a simple text-based BSOD or oops handler is a better idea than something that tries to do a whole bunch of cute graphics etc (which relies on a whole lot more hardware & software to be working properly).

      You are so not a Mac owner based on these statements.

    2. Re:Keep it simple by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Keep it simple AND keep it informative. A real BSOD will include information about the stop code and arguments at the time of death. If the system knows which driver caused the crash it will tell you this as well.
      The Mac panic screen not only takes more resources to display but they tell you far less. "Please restart" in 23 different languages is not helpful. The 10.0 and 10.1 version looked much better.

    3. Re:Keep it simple by blaster · · Score: 4, Informative

      The graphical version takes slightly fewer resources. You have to run a single buffer through an RLE decompression routine directly out into a linear mapped framebuffer. To display text you actually have to use all of the console code. Remember, there is no hardware console, so you have to actually do all the text element positioning in software, and the graphics card is in exactly the same mode either way.

      It does not take appreciably more resources either way, and both code paths are fairly simple and well tested.

    4. Re:Keep it simple by Jahz · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Keep it simple AND keep it informative. A real BSOD will include information about the stop code and arguments at the time of death. If the system knows which driver caused the crash it will tell you this as well.
      The Mac panic screen not only takes more resources to display but they tell you far less. "Please restart" in 23 different languages is not helpful. The 10.0 and 10.1 version looked much better.

      Obviously you are NOT ready for the Mac. Come see the light, friend.

      Do you really think that Apple have decided error codes and detailed crash reports are not important?? No, of course they have not. There are two reasons Apple does this.

      1) The truth is that the infamous blue page of kernel farts that windows spews out are only to technicians or sysadmins. The home user, and in fact, the power users, can do nothing with it. Nothing, of course, except Google for the stop code and hope Microsoft has a techhelp article on what it means. You can reply to this and say that

      STOP: 0x0000008E (c0000005, bf875fc3, f07bcd48, 00000000)
      KERNEL_MODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED

      makes perfect sense to you... but you'd be lying. I know that the relevent part is 8E but 99% of users NEVER NEED TO SEE THIS and will NEVER USE IT.

      Back to Apple. Apple has a little ditty called the "CrashReporter" and it has an OSX front-end to the system's log filed in /var/log/. The logs contain all the nitty gritty about what was in the registers when the sytem exploded, what driver/module caused it, etc readily and easily recorded in the system log. Said information (like STOP: 0x0000000000000000008E) is for a tech or sysadmin, not a standard user.

      2) What do you do with the BSOD info displayed?? A true nooblar would write it all down. That's a waste of time, becuase its also in Windows' system log. Assuming you're going to Google for it, you would presumably reboot the machine, right? So why did we even need to see the error when it happened? The machine is up not, and the logs are visible...??

      Bottom line: Apple's goal is to keep things simple, clean and friendly. What would your parents rather see?

      1. A pleasant semi-transparent overlay that asks them to reboot their machine (in their native language)
      2. A solid blue screen reading "KERNEL_MODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED" followed by 30 rows of random-like numbers

      Which one?

      P.S. - Don't even think about saying "what happens if you cant boot." If that is the case, remove the new hardware. Otherwise you are in DEEP trouble... the code doesnt really matter and you'd actually be better off reading the error from /var/log.
      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
    5. Re:Keep it simple by Jahz · · Score: 1

      Sorry in advance for the terrible spelling/grammar in that... I forgot to proof read it :)

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
    6. Re:Keep it simple by Senjutsu · · Score: 1

      The Mac panic screen not only takes more resources to display but they tell you far less.

      "Take more resources"?? The system has crashed! It's not like it's stealing precious RAM from your WoW instance, it's a single write into the framebuffer on an otherwise idled OS.

      All the geek info about what process blew up where when is available in /var/log, and you'd need to reboot to use that information anyways, so writing it out on screen when the system crashes is useless; the average user can't interpret it, and the power user isn't going to write it down by hand when they can copy and paste it out of the logs.

      The only priority at the time the system crashes is to put the crash info somewhere safe (the log files) and tell the user to restart. Giving clear instructions to restart and making it readable to non-English speakers is a lot smarter than going the "Guru Meditation 0000000.aj3837465" route.

    7. Re:Keep it simple by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Back when I ran a well-maintained NT 4.0 system at home one of the only instances of a BSOD that I experienced contained informative debug information. You're acting like the line that you typed is the only text on the screen dump.

      In my case, it obviously informed me that the Zip Drive driver had caused the crash. Good ol' Iomega. What the HELL were they doing having ANY access to the kernel. Oh well, that's the NT 4 driver model.

    8. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.

      What about the other 8? I think you've got a typo there.

    9. Re:Keep it simple by Phroggy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1. A pleasant semi-transparent overlay that asks them to reboot their machine (in their native language)

      I have one complaint about Apple's kernel panic screen:

      It tells the user they need to reboot, with absolutely no indication as to why. I'm not talking about a technical error message, I'm talking about a title at the top saying something akin to "The system has crashed." Being told you need to restart your computer, without being told that the system has crashed, is rather unsettling, in my opinion.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    10. Re:Keep it simple by jericho4.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Regarding your first point; I'm more than a power user. I can actually figure out what those funny numbers mean. But, I never, ever, do. Who the hell does?

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    11. Re:Keep it simple by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      It's not that your missing anything subtle it's that you are trying to be too subtle. There is a line in humor between analytically correct and funny. It's a fairly wide line.
      In the case of the GP joke (I was given the thinkgeek t-shirt as a gift, but I do wear it sometimes) it just wouldn't be funny as 01. For one thing, why the leading 0? Go ahead and read it to yourself with 1 instead of 10, I'll wait. Not as funny was it.

    12. Re:Keep it simple by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Oh, come now. I could teach my mom to use windbg in an hour. !analyze -v is getting pretty smart these days. Once she has the proper trap frame set the cause of the problem should be obvious.

      Seriously though, I didn't expect such a good post in response to my off the cuff troll.
      Thanks.

    13. Re:Keep it simple by ArwynH · · Score: 3, Funny

      Real Programmers don't mix up array indexing and counting the length of an array.

      And since the joke envolves the length of the array and not the index of it's last member, I guess the jokes on you.

    14. Re:Keep it simple by ista · · Score: 1

      Come on. Getting the reason for some Linux kernel panic is the same story.

      Faulty hardware like defective RAM or even a broken CPU fan running at only half the speed can be the reason,
      software errors in the base system or the kernel can be the reason as well as any "third-party" software (who sometimes
      also do install some kludgy kernel extension).

      Yesterday, my (PC) workstation refused to boot - no beep, no picture, nothing except the power led. It turned out that the fan on the graphics adapter, who went into smoke a few weeks ago. Obviously, the other fans in the case as well as my low usage of GPU-intensive work kept that adapter alive, just until I had to turn off the machine yesterday.

      Years ago, I symlinked "SEGFAULT/signal 11" to "broken memory". Nowadays, I don't do so any longer. It may be some fine line on the main board, some defective CPU fan, ... only if it comes to hardware. And after I've seen a valgrind session running a simple "php.cgi -i" (php_info()), I ignore any PHP if it is throwing those segfaults.

      Back to the panic screen: of course, you can present a dialogue stating that something went wrong, and it may be hard- or software, stating various things which "might" be the issue, but in the end, close to everything is possible. But what does the user get out of this other than "there's something broken and we're forcing you to reboot anyway"? If those messages do appear a dozen times a day, even the most dumb user would ask some engineer to take a look at it - and those guys will do check /var/log/ for suspicious entries.

    15. Re:Keep it simple by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ok, just to be clear, you and everyone else realizes that 'by default' since at least WindowsXP (2001), Windows just restarts and puts this information in a dmp file and the system log if it can.

      The end user doesn't have to look at ANY BSoD or geek speak...

      Just clarifying, cause it seems like people think Windows locks at the BSoD and scares stupid people - it doesn't.

      You also realize how many Mac users I have encountered talk about HOW THEIR MAC NEVER CRASHES, but it does ask them to RESTART IT EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE.
      (Apple hides the kernel panic/crash screens so well, most Mac users never realize their system has crashed. VERY MISLEADING, as most of them don't even realize they lost data on what they were working on if it wasn't saved.)

      Ok, carry on...

    16. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, would Apple lie when they say you absolutely have to reboot? I know a lot of Linux geeks do lie about technical matters, so that's why I prefer my Mac.

    17. Re:Keep it simple by Gnavpot · · Score: 2, Funny
      > There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.

      What about the other 8? I think you've got a typo there.
      There are 11 types of people in the world. Those who can count and those who can't.
    18. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STOP: 0x0000008E (c0000005, bf875fc3, f07bcd48, 00000000)
      KERNEL_MODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED

      This issue is caused by a code problem in GDI+ (the graphics device interface for Windows XP)

    19. Re:Keep it simple by liloldme · · Score: 1
      Bottom line: Apple's goal is to keep things simple, clean and friendly. What would your parents rather see?
      1. A pleasant semi-transparent overlay that asks them to reboot their machine (in their native language)
      2. A solid blue screen reading "KERNEL_MODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED" followed by 30 rows of random-like numbers


      If the piece of document they were working on is gone, they will be seeing RED -- and it doesn't matter what the OS is.

      Honestly, if the OS crashes who cares what it displays (unless your a dev trying to debug it)? Regardless, some items are going to meet the office wall with high velocity.

    20. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "

      1) The truth is that the infamous blue page of kernel farts that windows spews out are only to technicians or sysadmins. The home user, and in fact, the power users, can do nothing with it."

      You pulled this out of your fucking ass of fucking looser you are ?

      The windows blue screen of death helped me, three times, to see that i've got a very, very bad graphic and usb modem driver. With the Apple Message, how would i knew it ?

    21. Re:Keep it simple by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      a simple text-based BSOD or oops handler is a better idea than something that tries to do a whole bunch of cute graphics etc (which relies on a whole lot more hardware & software to be working properly).

      From TFA, the crash screen is a single image file, a screenshot. It's probably no harder to load a single screen than a stream of text. And OSX does have an option to display text error messages if you really want to see them.

    22. Re:Keep it simple by shabble · · Score: 1
      2) What do you do with the BSOD info displayed?? A true nooblar would write it all down. That's a waste of time, becuase its also in Windows' system log. Assuming you're going to Google for it, you would presumably reboot the machine, right? So why did we even need to see the error when it happened? The machine is up not, and the logs are visible...??
      I've had occurances where the BSOD comes up before any UI that would enable one to look at the logs - memory parity errors was one case, another was a driver problem. There is some benefit to having this technical information available at the time of the problem.
      Which one?
      Granted it's not a lot of use to 'parents' however.
    23. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It tells the user they need to reboot, with absolutely no indication as to why. I'm not talking about a technical error message, I'm talking about a title at the top saying something akin to "The system has crashed." Being told you need to restart your computer, without being told that the system has crashed, is rather unsettling, in my opinion.

      Well, duh. Everyone knows Apples never crash. Unlike Windows, which rarely manages uptime of more than 5 seconds, making it a mystery to every true Apple user how it can possibly be the operating system that modern civilization depends on.

      Anyway, quite clearly there is no need for such a message. Have another glass of kool-aid, step back into the reality distortion field, and stop worrying!

    24. Re:Keep it simple by landg61 · · Score: 1

      "...Windows just restarts..."

      Oh, is that all? That, and the 6-month reinstall cycle, is why I converted to OS X three years ago. Never mind 80K+ viruses to defend against, or now the WGA POC.

      I admin various *Nix systems for work, and used to be a slave to Windows as well. BSOD's, or the ubiquitous restart, don't scare me, they infuriate me. There is no reason on earth opening a document or application should trespass on the kernel (crappy drivers or no).

      When I get home, I just want something that works, no matter how hard I hammer it (say by doing something silly like playing with Debian in Q, or something usefull like rendering my latest DV--while doing whatever), and is useable and intuitive for my wife and kids. I have NEVER had a system panic on my Mac--or been asked to "restart" (except for by a few patches, of course, and far less than Solaris or HP-UX in that area). Yes, there are occasional user-land hiccups, the app crashes, and you have the option to send a bug report. Not saying a system panic can't happen, just that it hasn't. So far, it really does "just work."

      jm2c

    25. Re:Keep it simple by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      ... as opposed to Linux and other *BSDs, which infrequently crash and have no such graphical crash indication. I think - I've very infrequently experienced such things.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    26. Re:Keep it simple by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Well, other people would have just looked into the log file. But I guess you wouldn't do that.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    27. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no.

      The reason programmers start indexing at 0 is because it can be expressed as an offset from a base address if you do that. If you have 2 bananas for example, a programmer would index them as banana 0 and banana 1. He will still say that there are two bananas, though, because that is the truth.

      So, okay, there are 10 types of people in the world, type 0 doesn't understand binary, and type 1 does.

      You fail at being a geek. :-P

    28. Re:Keep it simple by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I agree, I always thought that joke was funnier in hex.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    29. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is one place I would like to see a graphical panic message. If the linux kernel panics, it writes out a text message to one of the virtual consoles. But, if you are running X, you can't see it - you just see that the screen has frozen. And, there's no way to switch back to the text console because the kernel panic locks up the system. It'd be nice if the system switched to display the text console, or overwrote some of the X screen.

      Perhaps there's also some way to get it to log the panic message to disk, to read after rebooting. But, I haven't noticed any log messages related to a crash in either Redhat or Suse.

    30. Re:Keep it simple by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      Come on. Getting the reason for some Linux kernel panic is the same story.
      The problem isn't getting the reason for the panic, it's figuring out WTF is going on.

      The first time I got one of those "reboot" messages on my iBook, I thought it was because of some sort of silent upgrade. Knowing that it was a kernel panic or whatever wouldn't *necessarily* tell me exactly the precise reason of the crash, but at least would have let me know something had crashed.

      With the current interface, a lot of users probably still don't even know that this screen is crash-related. And this certainly isn't going to help them fix the problem.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    31. Re:Keep it simple by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1
      Ok, just to be clear, you and everyone else realizes that 'by default' since at least WindowsXP (2001), Windows just restarts and puts this information in a dmp file and the system log if it can. The end user doesn't have to look at ANY BSoD or geek speak...
      XP does have a BSOD. It doesn't come up nearly as often as 9x Windows, but it does exist.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Windows_XP_BSOD .png
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    32. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had a kernel panic on four out of four OS X machines I've had. Just to add 4 data points to your one. I still like 'em better that the alternative, though.

    33. Re:Keep it simple by Lex-Man82 · · Score: 1

      according to the Microsoft documentation it means that either your RAM is bust or not compatible with Windows XP. But it could be wrong.

    34. Re:Keep it simple by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      "(Apple hides the kernel panic/crash screens so well, most Mac users never realize their system has crashed. VERY MISLEADING, as most of them don't even realize they lost data on what they were working on if it wasn't saved.)"

      You're kidding, right? The screen isn't "hidden" at all, it dims the screen and tells you to restart your computer with no other option. You can't not reboot by following the instructions (hold down power button). And you actually think that a user wouldn't realize that the Word document that they were working on for the last hour, without saving, is now gone and be pissed off? Seriously?

      Apps/Utilities/Console: Crash Log, see the details of all panics, failures, etc... via the GUI. You also seem to suggest that there aren't any Mac users out there that actually haven't had a crash *raises hand*, which is VERY MISLEADING.

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    35. Re:Keep it simple by phantom1584 · · Score: 1

      In binary, 10 does = 2

    36. Re:Keep it simple by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      I have NEVER had a system panic on my Mac--or been asked to "restart" (except for by a few patches, of course, and far less than Solaris or HP-UX in that area).
      Ok, so you're lucky. My iBook (and other Mac machines I've seen) ask for a reboot every now and then. It's certainly not a common ocurrence (roughly once every 10 weeks on mine, and I'm not using any funky stuff on that muchine, just basic MacOS and Unixy user-land software), and certainly rare enough that it's not really a major problem. However for most users it does happen. For example for me it certainly happens more than in Linux and I've noticed just as many UI problems in Aqua as in KDE. Nothing that ever was a real showstopper in either case but Apple certainly does ship software that isn't ready for prime-time on a regular basis (like the Linux desktops do).

      So if it works for you, fine, don't extrapolate from it though. You'll find heaps of counter examples like mine, just like I can find some people who somehow manage to crash every machine they come in contact with. I've been poking at computers for a living for almost 30 years now. So far I think the only really completely "stable" machines I've seen were mainframes and some minis.

      Computers only "just work" in the drool proof four-colour glossies. Not in real life.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    37. Re:Keep it simple by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the image has to be in "Kernal Raw" format, which I'm guessing makes it ready to just stream out to the video card through whatever "standard" process is already in place at a lower-than-driver level.

      When you get right down to it, if you send a text stream you're assuming that your video card is still working just as much as if you send a raw video signal. There's nothing magical about text except that for many years it was the lowest common denominator. These days, you need a certain driverless graphical ability to play - the lowest common denominator has increased - so there's no harm in taking advantage of that fact. Text was never magical in and of itself.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    38. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whooosh

    39. Re:Keep it simple by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter if you "render" text into a framebuffer or just write an image to it? PowerPC macs do not have any legacy PC "text-mode" video support (no b8000/b0000, no mode 3, etc), so you can only access the video through the fb.

    40. Re:Keep it simple by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      And you actually think that a user wouldn't realize that the Word document that they were working on for the last hour, without saving, is now gone and be pissed off? Seriously?


      I don't 'think', I KNOW...

      From dealing with my techs and 1000s of Mac users over the past years, this tends to be a PREDOMINATE concept that most of the casual users DO NOT GET. And it goes hand in hand with the concept that they TRULY think their Macs NEVER crash or lockup, even though they have seen this SCREEN numerous times...

      My words were from my and my tech's experience, not something I just pulled out of a box...

    41. Re:Keep it simple by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      I forgot to add that many of the tech calls have been about 'helping' the Mac user find the document they were working on, because it was just there and they can't find it and want help finding it...

      (And AutoSave in Word is a Godsend, but also re-enforces the concept that the computer didn't Crash, it just wanted to restart, because with autosave, they CAN find the document usually.)

    42. Re:Keep it simple by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      "BTW, for the record, real programmers start indexing at 0, so there's realy only 01 types of people when the measurement criteria is the understanding (or lack thereof) of binary. You sir/madam are, I believe, of the 'not understanding' variety."

      Real programmers start indexing at 0, but when you go for the sizeof(), you still end up with 02d/10b.

      Still, this is a really dumbass argument about a seriously lame joke.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    43. Re:Keep it simple by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      *hint* There's a reason Macs have a rep for being stable. Their users don't know they're crashing.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    44. Re:Keep it simple by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Mac users don't read log files. They merely sit in the corner, make stuff with Photoshop, and drink Starbucks coffee.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    45. Re:Keep it simple by BrettJB · · Score: 1

      It seems my own attempt at subtle humor went over like a lead balloon, though it is always fun to goad people with the "real programmers start at zero" schtick... Hilarity, as always, has ensued! ;)

      --
      Smell that? You smell that? Burning karma, son. Nothing in the world smells like that...
    46. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main reasons that the MacOS doesn't have any need for error codes are of course that - a) No one who uses a mac would have the faintest idea what they were or what they meant and b) the only good Mac is a dead Mac. Now that the boxes are full of Intel chips and will run real applications on a real OS (whether that be Windows or Linux) then surely the end to the overpriced paperweights is getting close. Any OS which uses speech to say "it's not my fault!!" should have been shot at birth!

    47. Re:Keep it simple by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Good old shit /. poster. Almost every OS in common use places hardware drivers in the kernel. Linux, the BSDs, Windows, SunOS, HP-UX, AIX, etc.

      Stop being a fucked up shit that can't stand the fact that Windows is actually usable to people that aren't you.

    48. Re:Keep it simple by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      exactly, please mod parent up, i'm so fed up with Mac users (like my mom for example) giving me a hard time about "windows" crashing all the time when:
      1. My system is Windows XP and it doesn't crash like Mac fans or apple commercials would have you believe.
      2. Their system DOES crash (sometimes) and they just don't know it because Apple hides it from them.

      Being a techie i'd rather know there is a problem.

    49. Re:Keep it simple by HeroreV · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, displaying an error message in a billion languages instead of just the language the computer is setup to use is definately much more helpful. You know, just in case you forgot how to read your prefered language at the exact same time that the kernel crapped out. You do know a backup language for those times that you forget the primary one, right?

    50. Re:Keep it simple by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Granted Windows and Linux allow any old binary third-party driver into the kernel that strikes the user's fancy.

      None of the others you list are that shoddy.

    51. Re:Keep it simple by Jahz · · Score: 1
      Jeez, I had no idea my OP would have caused so many different directions of discussions. First off, I agree that it should mention that there was a problem. However, nothing more specific because it doesnt make sense. If we hit the bsod point we are in a state where the only possible other option is to just tell the motherboard to cut power (if we can even do that).

      2. Their system DOES crash (sometimes) and they just don't know it because Apple hides it from them.

      Blah blah. Systems crash. Linux crashes, Windows crashes, Mac's crash, HP-UX crashes, Solaris crashes, etc, etc. You're saying that Apple "hides" crashes in some way that users don't know it has happened?? Is that a bad thing?? Are you insane?? If Apple have figured out a way to make their shit smell like fresh Roses, then I say more power to them
      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
    52. Re:Keep it simple by Jahz · · Score: 1
      Still, this is a really dumbass argument about a seriously lame joke.

      It is pretty lame, but I love when somebody gets caught in it. Priceless.
      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
    53. Re:Keep it simple by Jahz · · Score: 1
      Yes, displaying an error message in a billion languages instead of just the language the computer is setup to use is definately much more helpful. You know, just in case you forgot how to read your prefered language at the exact same time that the kernel crapped out. You do know a backup language for those times that you forget the primary one, right?

      I know that was probably meant as a joke, regardless... You do know that image is almost certinely hardcoded? It isnt like the kernel can go and look up the default language as its getting fried...
      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
    54. Re:Keep it simple by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      It's hardcoded as an image, it's a BSD based system, a symlink from the [bsod].tiff -> language.tiff resolves that easily enough & can be configured right along with all the other mappings they do when they set the default language for the OS on install.

    55. Re:Keep it simple by MSITHero · · Score: 1

      But as he said once it creates the dump it will reboot. It will not stay on that screen.

    56. Re:Keep it simple by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      But as he said once it creates the dump it will reboot. It will not stay on that screen. Sometimes it does. I think there's an setting somewhere that keeps it up. Last week one of my coworkers came into find her computer on blue screen, and back when I ran XP I got a BSOD once or twice and had to do a hard restart.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    57. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, what about the other 8? It's OK if you made a typo. We all make mistakes!

    58. Re:Keep it simple by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Either that, or you're making an attempt at humor

      I was. I was amused that someone would think that it was still clever enough to put in their sig, so I thought I'd egg him on a bit. And since it seemed to kinda work, I'm seeing if I can go another round.

      The whole thing is a silly waste of time, I know.

    59. Re:Keep it simple by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "You're saying that Apple "hides" crashes in some way that users don't know it has happened?? Is that a bad thing?? Are you insane??"

      I'm saying protraying a false image of their reliability is a bad thing, does that make me insane? Then guilty as charged.

      The next fanboy (including my mom) who tells me how reliable their Macs are gets a punch in the face, or a hug (if it is my mom).

    60. Re:Keep it simple by landg61 · · Score: 1
      Computers only "just work" in the drool proof four-colour glossies. Not in real life.
      Touché. I know I can't extrapolate a meaningful generalization with a single data point. Lucky? That'd be a first, but I'll take it where I can. I did go on the high end, because I wanted a 5-year system that would not earn my hate prematurely. At this rate, I might just shoot for 10, assuming Leopard (or its kittens) don't eat my lunch.
      iou98c
  12. This is taking things too far... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know that Mac users are supposed to be more friendly towards Windows users switching over but changing the kernal panic screen to match the BSOD is going too far. If you want it that badly, install Windows on a separate partition.

  13. What about the Guru? by lennywood1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd personally go for a nice old fashioned Guru Meditation Error. :) *Digs around his garage for his A500*

    1. Re:What about the Guru? by Aokubidaikon · · Score: 1

      lol. I used to think my Amiga caught a virus called "Guru Meditation" when that happened.

  14. Hidden? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Insightful
    hides the ugly kernel panics behind a nice looking GUI
    It must hide them really well because in 4 or 5 years I haven't seen one. (I did once about 5 years ago though - that'll teach me to mess with third party USB drivers.)
    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Hidden? by Stele · · Score: 2, Informative

      Funny - about the same amount of time since I saw one on any of my Windows boxen. YMMV.

    2. Re:Hidden? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      The last time I had a BSOD(on Win2000) was when I was upgrading my computer by basically moving my HDD and monitor into a new one. Linux ran(although due to my custom kernel not having the drivers for the new network card it couldn't load the network) but Windows BSoD'd until I reinstalled it.(I reinstalled Linux as well, but to get amd64 support)

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Hidden? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      I'd say the same, but by coincidence my wife got her first XP BSOD this weekend. Apart from that I haven't seen one for years. In fact, Linux, MacOS X and Windows all seem pretty free of kernel panics to me these days and maybe the BSOD jokes need to die...

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    4. Re:Hidden? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you've never owned an 800MHz iBook.

    5. Re:Hidden? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just said "boxen". lol

    6. Re:Hidden? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I admit when I first saw it on my brand new G5 (2003) I thought jokingly "Man, enough, they even made kernel panic stylish" and after a while using OS X/Mac I figured it is exactly same reason why they hide boot messages on stylish Apple logo with stylish progress.

      They don't want nerdy messages confusing users and still keep them in log file for those interested/would get use of them.

      For example,what is the use of this thing for ordinary user who just uses iMovie HD:
      "Sep 14 14:21:45 localhost kernel[0]: Got boot device = IOService:/MacRISC4PE/ht@0,f2000000/AppleMacRiscHT /pci@9/IOPCI2PCIBridge/k2-sata-root@C/AppleK2SATAR oot/k2-sata@0/AppleK2SATA/ATADeviceNub@0/IOATABloc kStorageDriver/IOATABlockStorageDevice/IOBlockStor ageDriver/Maxtor 6L250M0 Media/IOApplePartitionScheme/Apple_HFS_Untitled_1@ 3"

      I remember Linus spoke about non neccessary geek messages while booting Linux kernel making people "afraid" of Linux.

      So, if you are ordinary guy who just cares about boot messages if something is broken,it will fall back to "real" thing and show them. If your system is perfectly working, you won't see them. If you CHOOSE to see them, you pass a command to nvram making it "verbose boot". I use verbose boot for 2 weeks since I suspect a usb hub malfunctioning, I "busted" it twice and bought a new one.

      Everyone is happy at the end. That is why OS X is called a revolution for Unix desktop.

      Ordinary user can't fix/debug a Mach kernel, he/she just need to know "system stopped working" and he/she will just boot again. Why show them RISC or Pentium registers?

      BTW, (for others) as all systems (including BSOD windows), if you get those you better check your RAM with a "real" tool, e.g. Apple Hardware test which is given with all Macs. You will be likely surprised.

  15. Stupid boring new crash screen... by Moofie · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's not NEARLY as cool as the car crash sound Macs used to make when they really, really, REALLY blew up fierce. Get a good pair of speakers, and that sound would scare the tar out of everybody in the area!

    I think it only happened to me once, on a junky old LCIII, while I was just working. There was a key combo to induce it on boot, though, and I got a lot of mileage out of that...

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    1. Re:Stupid boring new crash screen... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      That's not NEARLY as cool as the car crash sound Macs used to make when they really, really, REALLY blew up fierce. Get a good pair of speakers, and that sound would scare the tar out of everybody in the area!

      I thought the old ones played "funeral chimes" when they crashed.

      -b.

    2. Re:Stupid boring new crash screen... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      The really older ones did. The really really REALLY older ones didn't play any sounds at all.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:Stupid boring new crash screen... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      Based on Mactracker's info, the Powermac 6100 had a car crash noise. Another model had a breaking window if I remember correctly.

      The LC III the grandparent mentions had the funeral chimes though. I still have one of those somewhere in my pile of obsolete gear, and if I can dig up the other supporting hardware I'd bet it still works.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  16. Gray screen of death by azav · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have gotten the gray screen of death twice on my Quad.

    When capturing QuickTime video, QuickTime writes one copy of the file and then makes another. If you are capturing to a mastering codec (ie animation) minutes can become gigabytes. It is easy to fill up the internal HD in this case.

    What can easily happen in this case is the file writing routines will start writing over allocated blocks. System files, even track zero. If it writes over track zero, your internal hard drive will be destroyed.

    How do I know this? It happened to me twice.

    The second time, I was left with a 17 GB file on my hard drive that can not be deleted by any means other than reformatting the disk. The first time it happened, the HD was borked so bad that plugging it into another Mac caused that mac to kernel panic. Apple replaced the drive but I lost everything minus my backups.

    As I was told by an Apple tech, when a hd starts up the dirve itself checks the validity of track zero. If it is invalid, you have a hardware fault and this generates a kernel panic.

    This was all validated by Apple techs.

    You have been warned. Hope this helps someone.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:Gray screen of death by cailyoung · · Score: 1

      This is why you don't use boundless capturing; it's why Final Cut Pro limits 'Capture Now' to 30 minutes by default and strongly recommends you do not turn off the limit. It's much smarter to use bounded capturing (i.e. Capture Clip) where the system knows the size of the file you're capturing before it starts so it can preallocate the space.

    2. Re:Gray screen of death by jez9999 · · Score: 0

      Hang on. Please tell me your OS does not allow 3rd party software to write a large file on the hard drive that causes system files to be overwritten. If so, I suggest you get in touch with the OS vendor as it sounds like a pretty serious vulnerability.

    3. Re:Gray screen of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't. Now if the disk is full then the OS may not boot because it cannot get sufficient resources to do its normal boot.

    4. Re:Gray screen of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you've been told a dozen times by now - don't capture video on your system drive. But let me add to that list: you should also use the native codec of your capture device, rather than a nigh-uncompressed codec.

      My hopes are with you that this doesn't happen a third time.

    5. Re:Gray screen of death by plasmoidia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uhh, am I missing something? Any sensible OS should not allow a program to write to a full disk. Period. It should return from the fwrite (or equivalent) syscall with a failure and the worst that would possibly happen is the program would crash because it did not handle that correctly (well, aside from losing the data that the program was desperately trying to write). If it decides to start randomly overwriting already allocated disk blocks, then that is a very poorly written OS indeed.

    6. Re:Gray screen of death by azav · · Score: 0

      Yes. You are correct.

      This has been a serious flaw in Unixes since I knew about it.

      The OS will let your HD fill up and overwrite itself.

      Many *nix flag wavers often defend this behaviour. Why they do is beyond me.

      In the real world, if I over fill my gas tank, parts of my car don't start disappearing.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    7. Re:Gray screen of death by slamb · · Score: 3, Informative

      This has been a serious flaw in Unixes since I knew about it. The OS will let your HD fill up and overwrite itself. Many *nix flag wavers often defend this behaviour. Why they do is beyond me.


      You're completely wrong. When the free space reaches 100%, write() will return ENOSPC (no space). The superuser will still be able to use the system, because traditionally, there's a 5% reserve which only uid=0 can use. (The "df" goes up to 105%.) The correct semantics are well-defined. If you've seen anything else, it's a bug in whatever system you were using, which no one could seriously defend.

      Now, if you're talking about user applications breaking when encountering this condition...yeah, there are certainly some out there that break. There are buggy applications written for every platform. It's just laziness - Unix gives them well-defined semantics they can use to handle it correctly and an easy test environment (quotas).
    8. Re:Gray screen of death by azav · · Score: 1

      I do not have access to the low level calls that the Quicktime player uses. The KP happened when the OS was duplicating a 7 gig file or performing a Save As. What it exactly does, I do not know.

      As the file was being written, the KP happened and all HD spce was written over (I had 17 GB free, but not 34 GB. The KP happened when writing the second copy of the 17GB file yet only some of my system files were trashed as was the 17 GB file that was left.

      You may be correct but something is allowing overwriting of important stuff.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    9. Re:Gray screen of death by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1
      Thanks, the car analogy really made my day. Every time when I think I've seen them all, nothing will be more inappropriate than that, someone comes along with a spectacularly flawed analogy and easily takes the top spot.

      If you can find any references to that filling-up-and-overwriting-itself story, that would be great. I'm guessing your program used dd or something similar to write the data. I'm also guessing that your "nix flag wavers" told you that:

      • That kind of tools are meant for disk formatting and other such tools, not user programs.
      • That kind of tools definitely always need root access
      So (while I'm still guessing), I'd say that the programmers made a quite bad choice when using something like that and communicated the dangers very poorly to the user. The user must have been pretty slow also, if he thought a video editing software really needs his root password.

      It's like buying a in-car-gps that includes automatic steering from a street vendor and letting it drive you home in downtown traffic, or something.

    10. Re:Gray screen of death by blob.DK · · Score: 4, Informative

      Excuse me, Sir, but that is a misunderstanding on your part. Mac OS X does not overwrite track zero just because the disk is full.

      What you have experienced is the phenomenom of Mac OS X getting caught up in: "ups, the disk is full - so now I can't save any (system) preferences." Any files written during this will end up as zero-byte files.

      There is no magic "QuickTime will overwrite vital systemfiles, to which only root has access"-routines.

    11. Re:Gray screen of death by stefanb · · Score: 1
      As I was told by an Apple tech, when a hd starts up the dirve itself checks the validity of track zero. If it is invalid, you have a hardware fault and this generates a kernel panic.

      Yeah, I know those calls. Did he give you the secret internal error number of one of these to expedite the shipment of the replacement drive? Just in case, it's one-d-ten-t.

      Now, please stop feeding the troll.
    12. Re:Gray screen of death by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not the point. A malicious user can hose the entire system by running 'cat /dev/zero >> /opt/junk'. And I mean hose as in "system unusable, 100% of data lost"; the worst kind of hosed. The fact that Final Cut has options to manage this doesn't detract from the fact that the OS should manage itself better. Writing over track 0 on the HD? Creation of undeletable files? What is this, a return to the 8-bit days again?

      When you get to 100MB free, the OS should tell the applications to go away. It should never fill 100% of the drive. Let's see you boot to remedy it when you can't write to log files.

    13. Re:Gray screen of death by azav · · Score: 1

      The program was the Quicktime Player and is was saving a file. Not too much out of the ordinary there, hence my analogy.

      Now, I don't know the routines the QT Player was using but something is seriously amiss.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    14. Re:Gray screen of death by azav · · Score: 1

      Mmm no. I packed up the Quad and drove to the local Apple Store on Knox Henderson where the drive was replaced after simply plugging it into other machines caused them to KP.

      Quads are heavy. Keep your box.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  17. Ultimate joke.... by ROMRIX · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The article also shows the ultimate joke is to upload an actual BSOD image for authentic Windows looking panics right inside of OS X."

    Ya! and then we could like, (snicker, snicker) we could like, bring up pictures of toilet paper on the monitor (snicker, snicker) and they would think (hehe, snicker) they would think they got T.P.'ed! HAHAHAHA!!!!!111!!!

    Did anyone else just develop a twitch in their left eye?

  18. Hmm.. poster hasn't used osx much by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It already has a black screen of death. Favourite for causing it is to plug in certain brands of firewire hard drive (once did it with a USB network card too).

    If the OS itself hasn't failed just the GUI you get the spinning wheel of death..

    Never heard of any kind of option that "hides the ugly kernel panics behind a nice looking GUI".. possibly a 3rd party app he's installed.

    1. Re:Hmm.. poster hasn't used osx much by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      KP's have been "pretty" since 10.2. Before 10.2, they would spill a bunch of terminal text over the upper left of the GUI. From 10.2 onward, they display a flat, modal dialog with an error message in several languages. In each case, the system would reboot upon the next input from keyboard or mouse.

    2. Re:Hmm.. poster hasn't used osx much by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      RTFA. He just found the image that's used for the Black Screen of Death and replaced it with a Windows BSOD screenshot.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  19. BSOD by belmolis · · Score: 1

    Maybe Linux needs to adopt this so as to ease the transition from MS Windows.

  20. Re:Crashes we'd all like to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    No, but with the right command-line tools, you might be able to do it yourself without being infected.

    Just be careful this doesn't open a backdoor on your computer. *rimshot*

  21. Oligatory Monty Python Reference by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    If the aptly named blue screen of death is indeed the ultimate joke, people should die laughing at it.

    1. Re:Oligatory Monty Python Reference by CrimsonScythe · · Score: 1

      Just reading your message, without the accompanying title, it turned out to be rather ambiguous. With the title, it's obvious that the joke would be so funny that people should die laughing from it.

      I, however, agreed completely with the alternate meaning, namely that if people really think this is the ultimate joke, they deserve to die laughing from it. Either that, or they should get a life. Just like us who read Slashdot have. Oh, wait...

      --
      The view was horrible and the smell was even worse; Julie severely regretted becoming a proctologist.
    2. Re:Oligatory Monty Python Reference by Pike · · Score: 1

      This is what we refer to as the Deplorable Joke.

      (the humor equivelant of the Deplorable Word)

  22. Re:I have only seen the Screen of Death on OS X on by malraid · · Score: 1

    My only one was when I brought the machine back from sleep, the thing was that I put the machine to sleep during a OS upgrade... I rebooted, reinstalled the upgrade, and everything worked nicely.

    --
    please excuse my apathy
  23. Another promise Microsoft didn't keep... by spywhere · · Score: 3, Funny

    There were rumors, before XP came out, that they were going to respond to the iMac by making the Blue Screen of Death available in five designer colors.

  24. Old and Busted: BSOD. New: RSOD by stevetures · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Whatever happened to the Longhorn / Vista 'Red Screen of Death'?
    Red is so much scarier.
    http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/05/07/4 15335.aspx

    1. Re:Old and Busted: BSOD. New: RSOD by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

      Senators from red states complained, so Microsoft went back to blue.

  25. a good joke would consist of the following steps by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Funny

    A good joke would consist of the following steps:
    1) set an Intel build of MacOS to display the BSoD
    2) instal bootcamp and a copy of XP, but never actually boot into XP
    3) find and install a cheep faulty RAM module that allows MacOS to kernel panic with some degree of frequency.
    4) bring the Mac in for service at an Apple store
    5) claim that MacOS started displaying the BSoD after you installed Windows.
    6) wait for someone to pick up the red phone to Cupertino.

    If you're dealing with an older Mac vet, add an obscure reference to Rhapsody and "Red Box" for bonus points and added confusion.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  26. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods by rcamans · · Score: 1

    That would be the slashdot audience, right?

    --
    wake up and hold your nose
  27. Bah! You young punks! by rocjoe71 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You young punks and blue-screens-of-panic blah, blah blah!

    ...In my day, we didn't even HAVE screens, just a blinking light and if that light ever stopped blinking, you knew there was trouble, boy...

    --
    Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
    1. Re:Bah! You young punks! by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      I still have that. On my switch. I wonder if I could get VMS to run on it?

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    2. Re:Bah! You young punks! by Centurix · · Score: 2, Funny

      Blinking lights? Luxury! In my day you had to keep the abacus lubricated, otherwise the beads would just stop!

      --
      Task Mangler
    3. Re:Bah! You young punks! by darkjedi521 · · Score: 1

      Might be better off with RT-11 or RSX-11

    4. Re:Bah! You young punks! by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      0 Newtons? Damn... you DO have an antigravity field... can I have one?

      -David

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    5. Re:Bah! You young punks! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      My first generation POWER architecture RS/6000 box boots up for several minutes just displaying status numbers on the alphanumeric LED readout on the box. Since it has no framebuffer in it at all, you simply have to watch the codes as it boots up. Eventually you get an AIX login prompt on the terminal you've connected to the serial console port. If it never gets there you start it again and watch the codes to figure out what's going on.

      POWER 1 boxes have a CPU card in them. It's a card with the cluster of chips that make up the CPU.

    6. Re:Bah! You young punks! by rocjoe71 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for noticing... I figure Newtons is a measure of kinetic energy so if I'm sitting here reading /. I'm pretty much stationary and therefore exerting 0 Newtons... but don't take my word for it, the last time I took physics doing the "Running Man" was cool.

      --
      Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
    7. Re:Bah! You young punks! by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      You're right that you're not exerting any newtons on most of your environment while idle, however, the earth is exerting 10m/s/s force on you, and you are exhibiting an equal and opposite force on the earth to avoid falling into the center.

      Now, if you were in free fall, at terminal velocity, THEN you'd have 0 newtons net... ;)

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    8. Re:Bah! You young punks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, and finding the error was just removing the mosquitoes. I still remember my first bug, damn that was good in those times!

  28. BSOD by derniers · · Score: 1

    sometime ago I used BSOD as the screen saver on a Mac (for a short time, on a G3?)

  29. Redmond... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 3, Funny

    Redmond, start your photocopiers!

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  30. Maybe someday we'll actually SEE it? by wardk · · Score: 1

    doubtful. been on OS X now for a number of years, not one single kernel panic.

    1. Re:Maybe someday we'll actually SEE it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I took a job as a Graphic Designer for a small magazine last year. They ran Macintosh exclusively. In the four months I was there, I had grey screen at least seven times, two of them happened while I was away from the comp. I also had many, many, many programs crash on me.

      At home I run Windows. I have not seen a BSOD in over six years. The last time was when I was running W98. For the past four years I have been using W2k, no problems.

      Now most of my machines are Linux and no problems yet.

      It has always been annoying for people to tell me that Macs don't crash and yet I have seen it many times in a short period of time.

    2. Re:Maybe someday we'll actually SEE it? by toddhisattva · · Score: 0

      You're just not mean enough.

      Open and close and open and close an iBook a few times real fast.

      Plug in old random hardware to the USB ports.

      Oh -- a software-induced hang? I think I've seen one.

    3. Re:Maybe someday we'll actually SEE it? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Or simply not been around long enough. Until 10.3, it wasn't hard at all to take down OSX, though 10.2 was stable enough to go a few days between reboots.

  31. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool! But I think I'll die of old age before I see one of those in real life.

  32. I've had... let's see... by Swift2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe half a dozen? That's since 2000, when I installed the Beta, and then 10.1. Two causes: when I installed Panther, I got a new USB hub at the same time. Half my kernel panics right then. It was a bad hub that delivered less than its rated power. BAM! Later, when I moved up to the G5, I moved my old OS over from the G4. I used Carbon Copy Cloner, but I screwed up something -- I now use SuperDuper! because it's a real Mac app -- and something got really screwy about root and my admin account. Again, another three reboots. Did a fresh erase and install, no problems since then.

    That's about 6 years now.

  33. only one OS X kernel panic for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've only ever had one OS X kernel panic. It was the first day I owned my Mac and I was furiously moving around files in Finder windows. I didn't own all of the files so periodically I had to authenticate myself. Then I accidently moved my /System folder to the trash. I realized what I was doing right after I hit the enter key.

    So I guess you could say my only kernel panic was due to carbon unit error.

  34. Its all good, but... by Ziwcam · · Score: 0

    I would sure hate to put the effort into creating a OS X BSOD, especially because I would never see it.

  35. When does your CD break? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!

    That was about as relevant as Andrew Dice Clay.

  36. What happens if... by mr_neke · · Score: 3, Funny
    System encountered a kernel panic in the panic() function.
    Cue infinite recursion...
    1. Re:What happens if... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      System encountered a kernel panic in the panic() function.

      Cue infinite recursion...

      Been there, seen it.

      What I love is an operating system that knows it's dying, bothers to tell you repeatedly as it's goind to bits. 'Couldn't find miscsrvc.dll, dying.', 'process that does nothing except has to be there when system is dying couldn't be found, dying.','foobar.exe not found, dying.'

      Notify Microsoft?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:What happens if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning...

      Error...

      Critical error...

      Error reporting system failure error...

  37. no news? by keytohwy · · Score: 1

    A thus, a VERY slow news day...

  38. Re:Troll Umbral Blot at it Again. by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

    to crash much less frequently != to be stable

    --
    So say we all
  39. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 2

    BSoD is for the NT (and XP) lines. Win9x is a blue screen, not a BSoD.

    The *reason* it called a BSoD, is because the computer will not do *anything* without a reboot. This is not usually the case under 9x.

    1. Re:Moo by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 0

      what kind of crack are you smoking? on the NT kernel line if the kernel panics ( IE crappy driver from 3rd party most of the time) the kernel will do a core dump and at minimul a selective memory dump, then automatically restart. Now on 9X / ME you get the pretty blue screen with the programmers shopping list written in HEX ( ok my bad i read tooo many web comics) and at the bottom of the screen it says press any key to restart windows. Not trolling or anything here but wouldn't the NT way seem better for an apple? I mean why do you want to be told to restart your computer when the crash handler could automatically do it for you?

      And for the record in 4 years i only saw my XP box do this once, and that was after i updated my ATI capture drivers.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    2. Re:Moo by freedom_india · · Score: 1
      will do a core dump and at minimul a selective memory dump, then automatically restart.

      NOPE. It will NOT do a reboot if you have NOT mentioned it in your system settings.

      And no, you don't want the system to reboot after every kernel panic. Take it from someone who has seen them for past 11 years (11 years 4 months and 11 days to be exact). When there's a bad video/other driver that's causing the problem, you do not want it to reboot automatically.

      You will go mad if it restarts tens of times an hour continuosly.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  40. Re:Troll Umbral Blot at it Again. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    The BSoD is much less common on 2000 and XP. Instead it just has a bunch of nasty DLL errors that require a reinstall.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  41. Yeah, funny like AFHV by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    The article also shows the ultimate joke is to upload an actual BSOD image for authentic Windows looking panics right inside of OS X.

    Ah man, now THAT'S humor. If by humor, you mean stupid.

    1. Re:Yeah, funny like AFHV by AliasN · · Score: 1

      THANK you, took the words right out of my mouth.

  42. Chairing a Meeting by Pfhorrest · · Score: 3, Funny

    I know it's off-topic, but I just had to share the image that came to mind when I first read this:

    Once upon a time, I was chairing an out-of-town meeting with a roomful of engineers...

    Picture, if you will, a meeting room filled with terrified engineers, all cowering behind one end of the table and desperately trying to shield their heads from ballistic chairs, being hurled by a Donkey-Kong like Steve Ballmer, who in turn is jumping up and down upon the far end of the table...

    I know the Steve Ballmer jokes are old and off-topic (and I don't mean to compare you to him) but the image of "chairing" a meeting full of engineers was just to hilarious not to share. :-)

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    1. Re:Chairing a Meeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the image of "chairing" a meeting full of engineers was just too hilarious not to share.

      Do you work in marketing, per chance?

  43. What a funny joke by insomniac8400 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Now that blue screens don't come up in xp anymore, apple is picking up the slack by letting you customize it's error screens to be blue. So all the blue screen refrences can still be valid. Thanks apple for writing a crappy os.

  44. Ya, but at least on the PDP-11... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    ... you likely had just saved your program, the switches were probably permanently set to the bootstrap loader address anyway, two (three?) switch flips and you're back in a whopping 20 seconds...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  45. Yeah but by yttrium · · Score: 1

    You can change it, but you'll probably never see it! haha... ive seen mine only once in the 18 months I've owned my PB.

    1. Re:Yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's about as frequent as I see it on windows. In other words, that's about as frequent as I burn out yet another video card.

  46. Guru Meditation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BSOD? bah, give me the best error message ever - Guru Meditation. I have so many good memories of my Amiga 500 choking, that I recreated it here.

  47. Becouse you all know... by dark-br · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Macs Crash Different

    And don't get me wrong, I'm typing this on a Mac and I would not trade it for anything else out there ;)

    1. Re:Becouse you all know... by irwtdvoys · · Score: 1

      I'm not gonna beat around the bush, I don't use a mac... Can anyone tell me if this has happened to their Intel-Mac yet ;) http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-6415770 050655464328&q=intel+mac+advert

    2. Re:Becouse you all know... by brian.reading · · Score: 1

      ugh. You're kidding me. If you use a Mac, you'll know half of what this guy is saying makes no sense. He even mixes Classic Mac OS complaints with OS X. And what the hell is "clover-leaf, period"?? Oh yeah, not to mention, this is old news. OS X has changed considerably since this was made. I'm Not trying to say Macs don't crash or anything, but honestly...Let's at least see something that's correct.

  48. Designed to corrupt the fs, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What do you do with the BSOD info displayed?? A true nooblar would write it all down. That's a waste of time, becuase its also in Windows' system log.

    *[terrified scream]*

    The system is so corrupted that the OS has decided to give up, but before it does, it's going to write to the file system at a time when the OS knows it can't trust itself? Oh shit, remind me to never use MS Windows for anything important. I'd rather the machine just froze mysteriously with no message at all, than do that.

    1. Re:Designed to corrupt the fs, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The system is so corrupted that the OS has decided to give up, but before it does, it's going to write to the file system at a time when the OS knows it can't trust itself? Oh shit, remind me to never use MS Windows for anything important. I'd rather the machine just froze mysteriously with no message at all, than do that.


      Writing debugging information to disk when the OS crashes is not unique to Windows. UNIX systems do this as well.

    2. Re:Designed to corrupt the fs, eh? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Oh shit, remind me to never use MS Windows for anything important.

      You actually need a reminder???

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  49. Re:Troll Umbral Blot at it Again. by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here we go again. Today, it's Umbral Blot's turn to have posts that came from rational, critical thinking twisted into "pro-M$ astroturfing" at the hands of the ever-spiteful Twitter.

    How do you live, Twitter? Seriously. How can you possibly function in society with this much venom and hate spewing forth from every word you say? Can you make it from Study Hall to Algebra without the kicker from the football team shoving you in a locker?

    I don't care how you do it, Twitter. Go to therapy, go to church, whatever. GET HELP!

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  50. Big deal by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Never had one on Windows XP, and have had exactly one on Windows 2000 with a bad stick of RAM. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, zealot.

  51. Lol by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    I got a BSOD while reading these comments, no joke :P

  52. Apple perfected the 'Bomb' of death! by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

    As a long time Mac user, I remember (not so) fondly the "System Bomb" graphic (a black spherical bomb with a lit fuse) that Apple used for system crashes prior to OSX. And those system bombs happend all the time, much more than blue screens of Win3x, Win95, or NT. But yes, the "System Bomb" pic was cuter than a blue screen with a bunch of white text, so it was in keeping with Apple's attention to "style" (even for crashes). ;-)

    (And of course, today apple uses the "Spinning beachball of death" for app hangs (but not for system crashes).)

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  53. Re:I have only seen the Screen of Death on OS X on by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

    I got a kernel panic on OSX 10.1 (some networking problem), but that's the only time. It was white with black text, if I recall correctly, displaying a bunch of unix jargon. :-)

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  54. BSOD image links dead... by benplaut · · Score: 1

    I decided to go and read this article because i'm in search of an authentic BSOD image, but the links in the article are dead.

    Any pointers as to where i can get one?

    1. Re:BSOD image links dead... by ggy · · Score: 1

      Install VMWare, Bochs, QEMU or any other PC emu. Install Windows ME. Grab a screenshot whenever it crashes. :)

  55. Re:Umbral Blot, Barkto (shadow) style Troll. by iced_773 · · Score: 1

    I'm getting a strange feeling that I've read this before...

  56. Re:I have only seen the Screen of Death on OS X on by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    I caused a panic on a iBook I bought spring of '04 by inserting a USB drive into the appropriate slot. Killed the system so bad that, after an hour with Apple support the OS had to be re-installed. Depressing.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  57. Well, My Favorite.... by JimXugle · · Score: 0

    If I ever get a mac (probly for college), My BSoD will be an image of a military officer in a state of great agitation.

    Kernel Panic.

    --
    -jX

    Don't you just love politics? It's like a comedy of errors.
    1. Re:Well, My Favorite.... by mccrew · · Score: 1

      Kernel Panic's superior officer is General Protection Fault.

      --
      Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
    2. Re:Well, My Favorite.... by JimXugle · · Score: 0

      If a Commander-in-cheif panic ever occurs... are we all dead?

      --
      -jX

      Don't you just love politics? It's like a comedy of errors.
  58. I'll see your Bomb and raise you a MacsBug by Monx · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but if you had MacsBug installed, you'd just type ea or es and exit the offending application, never seeing the bomb at all. Without Macs bug, you could push the programmer's switch and type GO Finder, but that was less reliable.

    Heck, I rarely even lost data in those crashes since I'd dump the offending application's data space to a logfile and reconstruct what I could from there.

    Too bad I never could get mouse support for MacsBug working properly. That would've saved much manual retyping of addresses.

  59. Re:Troll Umbral Blot at it Again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you please apply for a job as a journalist and show them how to do research and see more than just today.

  60. Re:I have only seen the Screen of Death on OS X on by Monx · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Here's how you get an instant crash in OS X:
    1. Open the DVD Player application.
    2. Attach a second monitor.
    3. Select Detect Displays from the monitor menu.
    4. Kaboom!

    For extra craptacularity, do this while installing a system update. Then you get to manually install the update in single user mode before your system will be bootable again. When I say manually, I mean manually extracting files from the pax archive and copying them to the appropriate location because systemupdate thinks that everything is OK despite dozens of system files modified by the update being mysteriously zero bytes in length.

    In my defense, the update was taking a long time, the second monitor was a my TV, and my PowerBook is my DVD player.
  61. Mac Performance Issues by MogNuts · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know this is offtopic, but I'm curious:

    I see alot of posts within the past few weeks saying that you don't need an amazing video card unless you play games. OSX heavily utilizes the 3D graphic cards in the actual interface, correct? I see all the new macs, for the most part, coming out with weak 3D cards. When a system is taxed, (or in general) doesn't the card affect OSX's performance? Or is OSX at a point where it's optimized enough that, for example, the integrated Intel chip in the mini will be just as fluid and responsive (graphics-wise only) as a mac pro with an ATI radeon x1900 (or a better example being an X1600 w/ 128MB RAM)? Recently I played with both side by side and the difference was not noticeable (however, I did not tax the system). But this puzzles me. Does a more powerful video card matter anymore with macs? It defies common sense (faster video cards in the past always gave better performance in day-to-day tasks in windows, for example).

    P.S. I do not own a Mac so I cannot test this myself.

    1. Re:Mac Performance Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the CoreImage effects, one only needs a graphics card with programmable pixel shaders, such as the GeForce FX series and higher, or the ATi Radeon 9700-derived line (this includes the 95x0 through the 9800 series). In lieu of games, more powerful graphics cards are used in Macs for WORK, that is, the pro apps such as Final Cut Pro and Motion, as well as the regular suspects, 3D apps such as Maya and LightWave. OS X can also reduce the eye candy for less powerful cards in much older Macs, such as the ATI Rage 128s in the old G3s.

  62. How I love my fans. by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm getting a strange feeling that I've read this before...

    That's because you, iced_773, read everything I write. Guys like you are my biggest fans:

    If it weren't for twitter, what would you do with yourself? At least we agree that Windoze blows blue screens.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:How I love my fans. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Twitter, please just admit that you have no experience with Windows post-win98 other than watching from afar, and therefore that you have no idea what you're talking about. It shines through in all your posts.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    2. Re:How I love my fans. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      also, on that last link, Iced DOESN'T agree with you. Anyone with a reasonable level of reading comprehension would see that he was taking the piss.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    3. Re:How I love my fans. by iced_773 · · Score: 1

      I was hoping you'd do something like this sometime! Now I get a chance to make a most sorry attempt to justify my posting habits!

      kept me away from Windoze[sic] programming since the early 95 API.

      Thank you! You just confirmed the point I made in the link!

      Calling me a Sith!

      I'd say "you must be new here", but you might not get that facet of Slashdot subculture, either.

      Calling me a troll again.

      I did make a bit of a mistake on that one, but I try to right my wrong in your next link. Perhaps seeing the whole thread will help you notice that

      Hey, you love me after all.

      Two more things about that link:

      1. I actually admit when I am wrong rather than scamper off into the shadows like a beaten dog. I realized that I was wrong and apologized. You could learn from this, rather than coming up with useless posts like "I'm laughing at you, dedazo" or completely ignoring the point of your detractors and spreading more citation-free FUD propaganda.
      2. I'm surprised you could be raising a four-year-old girl and never have heard of positive feedback. That's right. I was congratulating you for doing things the right way, rather than ignoring you and only saying "don't...don't...bad boy, go to your room".

      At least we agree that Windoze blows blue screens.

      It was a poor attempt at satire. But I should have expected that you would agree with it literally. You were the object of the satire, after all.

      Oh, and since you like links so much, I thought I'd leave you with an analysis some of your own. However, I have neither the time nor patience to go through them all myself, but fortunately two posters have done it for me.

    4. Re:How I love my fans. by twitter · · Score: 1
      Just keep reading and you might learn something. In the mean time, the joke is all on you.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    5. Re:How I love my fans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never read a post by you until this thread.

      You are delusional. If not for your sake, then for your family's sake seek professional help.

    6. Re:How I love my fans. by iced_773 · · Score: 1

      Once again, you fail to address any of my points and post such an intellectually troglodytic phrase such as "the joke is all on you". I can assume you don't have any way to defend against them. I win.

  63. Re:I have only seen the Screen of Death on OS X on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had one OS X (10.4.x) kernal panic on my PowerBook and (looking at the system log) it seems this was due to the modem device driver not releasing a resource correctly. (This makes sense as the crash occured just after disconnecting from a dialup session.)

    I have had many more BSODs on my Win2k box recently. This started out as a very stable system (>6 months continuous uptime at one point.) I think one of the memory modules may be going bad or some other hardware issue as the BSODs are fairly random errors and tend to occur when the machine is extra busy (doing a large file copy from CD to HD where there is much IO going on.)

  64. ms jokes by sowth · · Score: 1

    The moderators now work for microsoft. Anything which may be interpeted as negative about MS results in automatic troll mods. Have a nice day. :-)

  65. You want the ultimate joke? by rob1980 · · Score: 1

    On a Windows machine anyway...

    Wait until somebody goes AFK.
    Take a screenshot of their desktop, save to My Documents.
    Right-click -> Arrange by -> Uncheck Show Desktop Icons
    Set desktop background to bitmap you saved
    Hide Start menu
    Watch as their computer magically "quits responding"

    1. Re:You want the ultimate joke? by freedom_india · · Score: 3, Funny
      Its NOT Funny, OK ???

      Once we built a system for C*tibank (T+2) in FoxPro 2.6 for Windows and one of the users actually took a screenshot of the same, put it as background, and then complained our application doesn't work.

      We spent 2 FULL days debugging the damn application before we realized the issue.

      Oh.... &&%%$$&&

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:You want the ultimate joke? by neminem · · Score: 1

      I actually did something similar once as a joke, on my own computer: I took a screencap of the "enter password" screen (this was back in the days of 98), and stuck it up as my background, just to see peoples' reactions.

  66. Pretty instead of useful. by blanks · · Score: 0

    Yes just what I want.  my own custom image blocking any information regarding why my system just crashed.

  67. The Sad Mac was the best by prydain007 · · Score: 1
  68. Re:I've seen two and one was oddly today by Psykechan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Today no less, at the local Apple store I got a kernal panic "You need to restart your computer" message. All I did was put OmniDazzle on a new Mac Pro.

    What surprised me was that I had only ever seen the kernal panic only once before after using OS X daily over two years... and that was when I was trying to crash it. (Hint: disabling network adapters and enabling others while connected to an SMB share can cause unpredictable results under 10.3)

    While changing the crash message is interesting, it's not something that will make that much of a difference. I'm not going to say that OS X doesn't crash; after all, I managed to crash one by doing something rather safe. It's just not going to be a practical joke that has a quick payoff.

  69. Re:Troll Umbral Blot at it Again. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    I usually couldn't run Win95 or Win98 for more than about 6 hours without having problems that needed a reboot to fix. When I had to use 95/98 at work, I would reboot my PC every morning and again at lunch; if I skipped the lunchtime reboot I very rarely made it to the end of the workday without it crashing in the middle of something. WinXP can run for days without crashing. Notice I said it can run for days without crashing, not that you can't get it to crash.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  70. Its in the LOGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are writing the BSOD information down then you don't know enough to be dealing with it.
    Both OS log information that you can go back and get later, not that the information is helpful all that often.

    I seem to remember that OS X can be setup for remote debugging at which time you can start the remote debugger when the friendly death screen comes up.

    Only 1 time have I seen a mac freeze without the death screen-- and even then it had some information in the log. Apple's X-Serve will reboot itself-- so I don't care if it brings up a music video from "Death Cab For Cutie" because it will reboot before I get to it.

  71. "tripping" PSU by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's what he meant. His joke wasn't very clear.

    MS made XP reboot on every BSOD starting with service pack 2. Thank goodness for the boot menu F8->"Do not restart on system failure". Some problems would be nearly impossible to diagnose otherwise without an os reinstall.

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  72. Re:Hazzardous! Use at own risk. by Psykechan · · Score: 1

    Yes, if you must use the Sysinternals BSoD screensaver, grab it now before MS makes it disappear. It's fun for a few laughs and looks genuine enough even with the SYSINTERNALS_GREAT_SITE messages.

    I am warning you however, don't put this on your work computer if you work in the IT department and especially if you like to keep unsaved work in running apps on your locked system as your well-intentioned co-workers will try to fix your system. Thanks guys!

  73. Mod parent up by gottabeme · · Score: 1

    To quell some FUD.

    --
    "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    1. Re:Mod parent up by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      To quell some FUD.

      How exactly? By stating that the specifics of the problem are different to the perception? It's still a massive problem and spinning over it doesn't make it go away. The solution is simple; the OS reports the file as read-only when it cannot be written. Attempts to write should fail cleanly and not damage existing data. Granted an app may zero a file in preparation for a 100% re-write and then subsequently fail with data loss, but the OS shouldn't be doing that sort of stupidity on a day-to-day basis.

    2. Re:Mod parent up by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      As far as I understand it, the specifics of the problem are that the OS does not corrupt data on "track zero" as earlier posts mentioned. I think that FUD should be quelled.

      The problem you refer to is completely different. It's not about corrupting data, it's about the OS just not booting when it's out of disk space.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    3. Re:Mod parent up by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      It's not about corrupting data, it's about the OS just not booting when it's out of disk space.

      Sort-of. Any system would have issues with booting off a read-only medium. That's why linux distros such as Knoppix exist. However, the OS shouldn't let that happen in the first place, especially with a user-space application. That's the fundamental problem here, combined in this case with the fact that it's impossible to delete the file to remedy the situation.

    4. Re:Mod parent up by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Well, the default in GNU mkfs is usually to reserve 5% of the blocks for the root user. I don't know if OS X does this as well, but if it reserved even 1%, it'd probably prevent this problem. (Though it would probably be wiser to reserve a certain number of MB since even 1% of today's drives would be wasteful.)

      The undeletable file suggests fs corruption, of course. But that could have many causes. *shrug*

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  74. Er Whats Paper Tape? by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 1

    Most M$ and Apple fanboys won't know what you are talking about when you mention 'Paper Tape' They probably think you are talking about DUCT Tape.

    Ah Those were the days. I still have my Paper Tape Repair kit from my days at DEC.

    --
    I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
  75. I know what it means and I'm not lying by Myria · · Score: 1

    KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED means that an exception occurred in kernel code that did not have an encompassing __try block. In other words, it's an exception that the system did not expect.

    Almost always, it's caused by a driver programmer that did not know what they were doing when they wrote the driver. Even if the exception occurs somewhere in ntkrnlmp.exe, it's usually some dumb driver's fault. Bugchecks caused entirely by Microsoft code are uncommon.

    If I owned a Mac, I'd want to see that information. It makes sense to disable it by default, but people like Slashdotters do want to see it.

    By the way, you don't see this in Windows XP or Vista. XP and Vista reboot immediately on a bugcheck by default then display "The system has recovered from a serious error" when they come back up, with no technical details unless you ask for them. Getting a blue screen when the kernel bugchecks requires going to a menu 99% of users don't know exists.

    Melissa

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
  76. Oh really? by rov4416444 · · Score: 1

    I didn't even know, because my Mac has never crashed.. ever. My Windows XP machine just reboots itself. I'm supposed to think it overheated or something, I guess. Very clever.

  77. Re:I have only seen the Screen of Death on OS X on by earthpig · · Score: 1

    i see it occationaly, but it seems to be always when it wakes up from sleep with my usb sandisk memory stick mounted.

    i try to remove it before it sleeps, but sometimes i forget.

  78. Mac OS X by Kampf+Katze · · Score: 1

    I hear the OS X is available for PC:s now. True or not?

  79. Re:Troll Umbral Blot at it Again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True.
    As true is that by your definition, no system is stable.
    You can find many many people who have machines where linux crashes more than xp. Sure it might be the hardware but then ? It crashes more, ditto.

    That said, for anything except servers, an average of one/two crash/year (the average on my machine) is not a problem.

    Seriously, I can promote Linux to my boss saying it would crash one less time in, say, a 2 years timeframe, but that is quite not a point if I wanted to convince my mother to install it.

  80. Ultimate ? by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    Im sure there are some much better kernel panic ideas than a BSOD?

    How about a Guru Meditation ? http://guru.simon.net.nz/

    There must be some other cool ones out there?

    Nick ...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:Ultimate ? by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1

      How apt. The first and the last comment of the thread mentioned the same thing.

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  81. The difference being... by mlopes · · Score: 1

    ... I've been using Mac OS X for a few years now and had never seen that reboot request, tought it alredy bloqued on me a few times!

  82. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  83. Please explain me... by jesterpilot · · Score: 1

    why we have to choose?

    1. A pleasant semi-transparent overlay that asks them to reboot their machine (in their native language)
    2. A solid blue screen reading "KERNEL_MODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED" followed by 30 rows of random-like numbers

    Which one?


    It's perfectly possible for a bsod to have a part that tells the user "Hey, sorry, but you need to restart your computer.", and have a second part that says: "Technical information: blablabla, you can look at www.yourdistro.com/kernelpanic or use Google for more detailed info..."

    --
    Trust me, I work for the government.
    1. Re:Please explain me... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1


      Apples don't crash, or BSOD. It's corporate policy, dintchaknow. They merely need restarting periodically. Restarts don't count against the continuous running uptime on their logs. ;-)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Please explain me... by greed · · Score: 1

      By a similar "corporate policy", IBM(r) PCs(r) don't have a reset button. They don't need it, the hardware is so good, it never crashes.

      Even if you believe that, you still have to run software on that hardware.... Oh yeah, right, OS/2 is so good, it never crashes either.

      ...which means you're reaching around back to pull the power cable, because the software-controlled power supply won't turn off with the OS frozen. (The hold-power-for-4-seconds trick hadn't been put into the IBM(r) PC(r) back when I last had to deal with OS/2.)

    3. Re:Please explain me... by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....Apples don't crash, or BSOD. It's corporate policy, dintchaknow. They merely need restarting periodically.......

      It might as well be corporate policy as far as I am concerned. My G5 has crashed ONCE in two years and that was my fault. I unplugged an external drive without putting it away. After I got the warning not to do such a foolish thing, I plugged the drive back in and that's when that reboot screen came up. In OSX, such a screen or a dead freeze is most often associated with a hardware problem which the system doesn't "know" how to handle. Since Apple is the only computer you can buy that makes BOTH harware and software together as a SYSTEM, it stands to reason that their computers should have better reliability than in the Windows or Linux camps. In the latter two, human communication of specifications, subject to misinterpretation by either the hardware builders or the software writers leaves a much larger chance for an untested error to occur. Apple can and does test their hardware TOGETHER with their software, a luxury NONE of the other PC makers enjoy. Because of this greater reliability, Apple doesn't really need to inform their users of the gory details of why the system froze or crashed.

      --
      All theory is gray
  84. MOD UP PARENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Writing to disk in case of a system crash is asking for trouble.

  85. No car crash on LCIII by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

    ... the LCIII used to make a noise like a funeral in a supermarket. I recall it well, since I got it a lot thanks to not seating my additional 4MB SIMM correctly.

    The crash didn't appear until PowerMacs ...

    --
    "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    1. Re:No car crash on LCIII by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Hmm. It was when I was working at a Mac shop at my university, in 1993. I really didn't think we'd gotten upgraded to PowerMacs yet, but I don't remember precisely.

      At any rate, it was way fun.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  86. What Kernel Panic? by Nitewing98 · · Score: 1

    I've heard of kernel panics, but have yet to experience one. Like most Mac users, I remember (hatefully) the old "bomb box" from pre-OS X Mac operating systems. But I have not experienced a kernel panic in OS X and I've used it since Jaguar through Panther and now Tiger.

    Oddly enough, I have an old G3 iMac and use XCode to develop AppleScript Studio applications. You'd think I would have had a panic by now!

    I strongly suspect that folks that have frequent panics have over-loaded their Macs with lots of third-party extensions. Which puzzles me, given the "out-of-the-box" functionality of OS X. What do you want it to do, make coffee for you?

    --

    Nitewing '98

    Everything works...in theory.

    1. Re:What Kernel Panic? by mtxmorph · · Score: 1
      What do you want it to do, make coffee for you?

      Nah.. I prefer hot chocolate with marshmallows... :P
    2. Re:What Kernel Panic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What do you want it to do, make coffee for you?

      Yes, and please put it in the retractable cup holder. Thank you, Mac.

  87. Re:Troll Umbral Blot at it Again. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

    Can you make it from Study Hall to Algebra without the kicker from the football team shoving you in a locker?

    Considering he's married with kids, I damn well hope so.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  88. You again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations! You're Slashdot's number one brickheaded literalist. No wonder you're unable to comprehend the Mac. Linear thinkers like you are better off with Linux or Windows.

    1. Re:You again! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm a clear thinker and therefore immune to the Reality Distortion Field. Those who are fully under the effect of the Field think they're "creative" and call those with logic "brickheaded literalists".

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:You again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you autistic, by any chance? That would explain a lot.

    3. Re:You again! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Yes. Are you moronic, by any chance? That would explain a lot.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  89. let me check my program ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    that'll teach me to mess with third party USB drivers

    Let me check ... yep, for some reason, that's a valid excuse for Macs, but a lame one for Windows.

    Nevermind - carry on! ;)

    1. Re:let me check my program ... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Let me rephrase that more precisely. Shareware USB drivers.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  90. Re:I have only seen the Screen of Death on OS X on by mallardtheduck · · Score: 1

    I remember the first GSOD (Grey...) I got on OS X. I plugged in a pysically damaged USB stick.
    Ironically, Windows XP, in the same situation just gave me a message saying the USB device was malfunctioning...

  91. Ultimate joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed.

  92. Might be a bad idea... by autophile · · Score: 1
    A BSOD on OSX? I really don't need three years taken off my lifespan.

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  93. How'd you guess? by argent · · Score: 1

    I have an old G3 iMac and use XCode to develop AppleScript Studio applications.

    I wouldn't expect that application programs in an interpreted language would do anything to cause panics.

    I mean, at Finals Week at Berkeley in 1980 we had over 60 people at a time logged in and developing "C" code on a single PDP-11/70 ... the EE/CS undergrads all shared the one machine in the basement of Cory Hall.

    What's most likely to cause panics is driver problems, file system problems (HFS+ isn't all that robust, I've had it blow chunks when I've left it running at less than 10% free space), and hardware problems. Application level stuff is really unlikely to panic the kernel.

    What do you want it to do, make coffee for you?

    Yep, iceCoffee is one of the extensions I use.

  94. Re:Not like Microsoft invented it...?!? by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

    "But it is true that Windows rarely crashes. Or maybe it's more accurate to say it either never crashes or it always does, but mostly it never does. As most crashes (in my experience) are caused by unsigned drivers, you're either going to have a problem or you're not. But mostly you're not. And if you do, fixing it is usually as simple as just updating the driver."

    So it might be, or maybe not, then again it could be, but most likely it isn't, in any case update your drivers.. sheesh you sound like you work in tech support.

  95. Blame the Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Acutally, the big problem with Apple is its hardware. For example, Macbook.

    There are quite a few design flaws and hardware problems. Random Sudden Shutdown
    is well known. Memory upgrade can easily damage the logic board ( you would
    not expect that a little bit push can cause more than $800 damage).
    And worse of all, the damage is not covered by warranty because it is "user damage".

    Brilliant! Apple! Have a flawed memory slot design, charge $600 for 2G memory and if
    someone dare to not pay the $600 and choose to upgrade by themselves, let them risk
    paying $800 for "user servicable" memory upgrade or endup with a brick.

  96. huh? by macinrack · · Score: 1

    I don't know what you guys are talking about. I have used a pismo since 2000, (which crashed all the time in OS9). A year or two later, I installed OS X, and never crashed again. Applications bite it now and again, but never the OS. No longer do I have to embarrassingly reach for the main power switch to bring the box back from the results of turkey software. I almost forget what that was like. This laptop is in constant use, never shut down, except to travel somewhere or update software that requires restarts. Why anybody would put themselves through the pain and utter misery of a using a horribly-designed and bug-riddled OS, is beyond me. Life is too damned short.

  97. who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares

  98. Re:a good joke would consist of the following step by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    What about "Yellow Box"?

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World