Slashdot Mirror


Going Pink For October

Matthew Oliphant is inviting anyone and everyone to turn their Web sites pink during October, which is National Breast Cancer Awareness month. Nearly 150 sites have done so as of this writing. And by the way, guys can get breast cancer too.

266 of 352 comments (clear)

  1. OMG Ponies!!! by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine a month filled with pink fluffy ponies. Bring it on.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh god, the nightmares had almost stopped.

      Unfortunately beyond the jokes, breast cancer is bad.
      Noone is immune, it knows no boundaries, rich and poor, famous or not it could hit.

      I saw this checkoutmybreasts site recently which apart from featuring nice graphics was very informative.
      (As most of us are blokes it won't affect us directly, but spare a thought for your partners and get them to check)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by cp.tar · · Score: 3, Funny
      spare a thought for your partners and get them to check

      Here's a better idea: check them yourselves.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    3. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

      what about checkoutmyvagina.com? STDs, cervical cancer, etc are just as bad as breast cancer.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by nacturation · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Leave it to the 90% male Slashdot audience to laugh at something like breast cancer.

      And when there's a story about prostate cancer, this same 90% male audience will be joking around about that too. Get over yourself.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by Smidge204 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Complete with Do-It-Yourself instructions for prostate drainage!

      =Smidge=

    6. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by buswolley · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Laugh at breast cancer? We laugh at the color pink. We laugh at turning websites pink. We laugh at the memory of /. turning the website pink with tittles like OMG! Ponies!

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    7. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      Anyone else notice that this would also make a lot of sites turn pink for national orgasm month? I suppose its a rather fitting color.

      --
      Bottles.
    8. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Yeah, pull your finger out of your arse!

    9. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by killermookie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not to be a pig or anything...

      Who else tried to see if http://checkoutmyvagina.com/ was a real site?

    10. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 1

      Bring it on.

      Seriously, bring it on. Slashdot should be pink for October.

    11. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by MarkRose · · Score: 5, Funny

      And when there's a story about prostate cancer, this same 90% male audience will be joking around about that too. Get over yourself.

      Exactly. Besides, we all know that if you're not pro-state, you're a terrorist!

      --
      Be relentless!
    12. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by Nataku564 · · Score: 1

      You do realize that if you cruise myspace for more than a few minutes, you will find ample examples of the "OMG Ponies!" flavor of female netizen.

      Stereotypes, more often than not, exist for a reason - that being a significant percentage of the population is percieved as acting in the manner consistent with the stereotype. Making jests about such things may be disgraceful to you, but it is quite amusing to the rest of us who aren't wound up quite so tight.

    13. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      breast cancer is bad.
      Noone is immune, it knows no boundaries, rich and poor, famous or not it could hit.


      And more people die of prostate cancer than of breast cancer. Yet, strangely, I see no huge PR campaign against it. I guess breasts are more trendy.

    14. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by b0r1s · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just a quick reminder - Breast cancer is up 80% over the last 30 years - definitely a worthwhile cause!

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    15. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1
      And when there's a story about prostate cancer, this same 90% male audience will be joking around about that too. Get over yourself.
      This thread contains plenty of posts regarding prostate cancer, and most of them are serious posts. Not jokes.

      Ok, I must be missing something obvious, because I hit parent-parent-parent, followed this thread to all its leaves, and I didn't see a single post about prostate cancer -- much less a serious one -- until that first reply to yours saying we will joke about prostate cancer if there's a story about that.

      Maybe you are using some strange definition of "thread" of which I wasn't previously aware?

      Furthermore, you're posting anonymously. Have you even signed up yet? You could be part of the growing percentage of women here, instead of complaining about how there aren't any. Actually signing up will do infinitely more to make the atmosphere less mysogynistic than lecturing us about how bad it is to laugh at an old April 1st joke.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    16. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by wboelen · · Score: 1
      I guess breasts are more trendy.
      I'll come back to you when I hear about someone who likes huge bouncing prostates.
    17. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      We do, but its not always practical to give your girlfriend an MOT without a discussion beforehand.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    18. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      Only in your country, dude. The rest of the world didn't give a fig.

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    19. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by fuocoZERO · · Score: 2, Funny

      promote prostate cancer awareness www.brownforoctober.org! I'm going brown for October.

    20. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      Yup. Seconded.

      They won't of course. We exist to serve Slashdot, not the the other way around.

      Many Many Years Ago it was the trend to adapt the AIDS.GIF red ribbon into a variety of colours, including pink and put it somewhere prominent on your website for the duration of the awareness day/week/month. Alas now that sites are all shrink-wrapped copyrighted designs, there's no scope for that now. Which is a shame. ...

      I'm a bloke, and on the denim jacket that I'm kinda addicted to wearing, is always the current Breast Cancer ribbon badge (or 'button' if you are from the US*), along with a large Star Trek insignia, a SuSe Tux, an Aids Ribbon, and a Scottish Flag. Yes.... I'm [very] Sad.

      -Jar.

      *What IS that all about? Buttons are the things that hold your shirt closed....

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    21. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Here's a man who just won't grab the opportunity to grab some boobs.

      It's rather sad, really... *shakes head*

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    22. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Theres a difference between grabbing some boobies and broaching the subject of an unusual lump.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    23. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

      I'd like to go on the record as preferring breasts over prostates.

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    24. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by Duds · · Score: 1

      My mother has had breast cancer.

      She would have laughed at most of this.

      Ergo, please go away.

    25. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by russotto · · Score: 1

      Actually, prostate cancer has disease of the week exposure now too. There's an event in the summer at the Philadelphia art museum like with MS, MD, DMA, SDMI, and all the other popular diseases (breast cancer is still more popular, with TWO events. One for each breast, presumably). And Genaurdi's (Safeway to the rest of the US) had some sort of donation campaign for it. I haven't yet seen the Brown Ribbon of Prostate Awareness on a car yet, but I'm sure I will soon. Yet another Sign of the Apocalypse to be checked off.

    26. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1
      (or 'button' if you are from the US*)


      I think your sample size is too small. I've only ever heard them called pins, and I live in the USA. Badges, if they're bigger, especially if you don't need no steenkin' ones.
      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    27. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by gid · · Score: 1

      The firefox plugin, slashdotter, has OMG!!! Ponies!!! support you know. Just turned it on, the only drawback is that the stylesheet gets changed after page load.

    28. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      That is, of course, completely and utterly true.

      However, in a vast majority of cases, there are no unusual lumps... but the boobs are still there.

      Besides, you'd want your s.o. to have nice and healthy boobs, so you'd better do some checking of your own anyway. Show her you care. ;)

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    29. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by Nerd4News · · Score: 1

      My website is now pink for the month. I put a nipple on it too. Posting the URL would be too easy, just google for boobs, breasts or titties. You'll find it I'm sure...

    30. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      Yes and I'm sure there are also hook nosed Jews and black people who do drugs. I'm sure making jests about such things may be disgraceful to you

      ok, so they're not...

      I must have lost my taste for utterly tasteless, bigoted humor when I got married. Oh wait, stereotyping women and making jokes of it isn't bigoted. It isn't bigotry when people are laughing! Ha ha ha hah. Everything is cool as long as it's funny, right?

      I don't make any apologies at all about the fact that I was raised in the 1970s when making jokes like this was considered bad taste. And in my day we had some of the funniest comedians around - not like today's recyclers of what people in my generation came up with.

      PS: Myspace != Slashdot. If Slashdot's editors had a problem with the women of Myspace.com, then they should have taken it to them. The women of Slashdot are the top of the evolutionary ladder.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    31. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by spun · · Score: 1

      Tell her you need to get to know what her breasts are like before hand, so you will know if that lump you find is unusual. Explain that this will probably take quite a bit of time, say ten minutes a day for the next several years. Tell her, that in the interests of fairness, she should manually palpitate your genitals during the process to see if she can find any lumps.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    32. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by penguinrenegade · · Score: 1

      I agree with the above. No one is immune, and it can hit anyone.

      I changed my site without prompting by my wife. Her smile alone was worth it because she knew I care.

      Those who make jokes on this have obviously never even thought about it. Being on Slashdot it got my attention. I have known several women close to me wh have had it in some form. The reason that it is a high-profile cause is that men who have been affected by it have zero problem supporting their women in the fight against it.

      300 men in the US die from it each year. 40,000 women do. Better than 130 to 1 odds that it will strike a woman instead of a man. A woman has about a 1 in 60 chance of dying from breast cancer in her lifetime.

      It's worth going pink. Real men have no problem with supporting their woman.

    33. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by Nataku564 · · Score: 1

      Making fun of a behavior is quite a bit different than making fun of an ethnicity. You choose to do the behavior, while you can't choose your ethnicity. I have absolutely no problem making fun of people who make a conscious choice to be retarded in their online conversations.

      I'm not entirely sure why you are turning this into a gender thing. Sure, women comprise the majority of the people who commit such heinous acts of grammar and spelling, but its not as if we were criticizing them for being women. We were critizing what we felt was silly behavior, not the fact that they have an extra X chromosome.

      I don't see a huge uproar about the "White and Nerdy" music video, despite the fact that it stereotypes male geeks. This is, of course, due to the double standard that society holds towards such things, but also due to the fact that guys tend to not care. I, personally, thought it was hillarious.

      You are also quite right that Myspace is not Slashdot. Slashcode actually has a halfway decent uptime. Also, simply because a joke appeared on slashdot, does not mean it was personally directed at some subset of the slashdot audience. Besides, I would wager a good portion of the female readers of slashdot were quite amused by that day, along with everyone else who has a sense of humor.

    34. Re:OMG Ponies!!! by StillWaiting · · Score: 1

      I ordered pennies from pressedpenny.com almost a month ago and have not received them yet. i am frustrated because there is no contact telephone number or email on your website, nor is there a contact email on these postings., PLEASE CONTACT ME ASAP - KristinFtnHills@aol.com

  2. Finally by IPFreely · · Score: 3, Funny

    A good reason to revert to OMG Ponies!

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    1. Re:Finally by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      hm.. cancer or more 'OMG ponies'. now there's a conundrum.

  3. Hmm. by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

    I redid mine last month ... but went with Brown. Oops. Who could've expected that pink would make a comeback? Ah well. Maybe I could put a ribbon-image on it instead ...

    1. Re:Hmm. by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      Brown to go with your brand new Zune?

    2. Re:Hmm. by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Now why in the blue blazes would I buy one of those?

      No, brown to go with the general colour-tone of the west coast pacific sunset I used as the header image.

    3. Re:Hmm. by Mononoke · · Score: 5, Funny
      I redid mine last month ... but went with Brown.
      Last month was colon cancer awareness month? How did I miss that?
      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    4. Re:Hmm. by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      No joke, my stepdad died of colorectal cancer in '98 :(

      But, as stated above, that wasn't the reason for the website colour :)

  4. Strangely unfamous cancer by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What color do I make my website for prostate cancer?

    1. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      Violet.

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    2. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by dema · · Score: 1, Funny

      What team is playing the Raiders right now?

    3. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I always make that point too. Prostate cancer is as prevalent in males as breast cancer is in females, and kills about the same number of people too.
      But for some reason there isn't the same concern for it.

      What is really disappointing is that some women criticise men for not caring about breast cancer, but seem completely unconcerned themselves about one of the most common cancers for men.

      As with most things gender-related, it shouldn't be a case of competition, but it is for the simple fact that there is an overwhelming lack of effort out there on the part of men's health issues.

    4. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by Hahnsoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apparently, it's light blue for Prostate Cancer, and Prostate Cancer awareness month is September (at least it was last year).
       
      Breast Cancer strikes fear in the heart of many women despite being one of the most treatable cancers. I'm sure TFA has his/her heart in the right place, even though I can't see how making pink websites would make a difference.

    5. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by lakeland · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Prostate cancer has a much higher tendency to affect older people than brest cancer. When you're old, people expect you to get sick... People don't like the idea of previously healthy 40 year olds suddenly getting mortally ill and prostate is less of a problem in this age bracket than brest cancer.

    6. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      but it is for the simple fact that there is an overwhelming lack of effort out there on the part of men's health issues.

      I strongly agree that breast cancer receives far more attention then prostate cancer. However, in most cases the bias is the opposite. There are numerous health issues where men receive most of the attention.

      For example, heart disease and lung cancer are overwhelmingly associated with men, although they are just as likely to kill women. Heart disease it is the number one killer of woman, although women are less likely to receive proper treatment of a heart attack, and 75% of heart disease research patients are men. See http://www.womenheart.org/information/women_and_he art_disease_fact_sheet.asp

    7. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by t-twisted · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have mod points but I can't let this pass:

      The only reason breast cancer awareness is so high is because women, WOMEN, organized themselves and brought both the public and government's attention to it. This was more a grass-roots effort that became a force to be reckoned with than a "oh, never mind the men, we women are more important!" action. Breast cancer was thought to be treatable and curable through early detection and women set out to prove it through these campaigns, rather than continue the barbaric treatment of lopping off their breasts and blasting them with chemotherapy to treat any and all signs of cancer.

      Yes, prostate cancer is high among men, it's the second leading cancer for men. For every 3 men who die of prostate cancer, 4 women die of breast cancer, so it's almost, but not quite, equal. What makes it more unequal is 70% of all prostate cancer cases occur in men 65 years or older in age. Compare that to 50% of all cases of breast cancer cases occur in women 61 years or older in age. In addition, prostate cancer can be so slow-growing as to be a non-issue in men - they frequently die of causes OTHER than prostate cancer due to age.

      I think it's misguided to be "bitter" that one group garners more attention than the other, when one group isn't doing as much as the other to bring attention, publicity and resources to their cause. You're right, this isn't about a competition, this about who is doing what for their "own". And don't think men do not benefit from the publicity and research generated from these campaigns, as men can get breast cancer, too.

      However, I can't even believe you went there with your "overwhelming lack of effort out there on the part of men's health". Please. Do you know how differently signs of a heart attack present themselves in women than men? Yet the rhetoric (tingling in left arm, shortness of breath, etc) is always about signs of impending heart problem in a man, not a woman, yet heart disease is the #1 killer of women, too.

      Don't be upset because a group of people got organized. Organize yourself and get out there.

      T.

    8. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by proverbialcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thank you, thank you, thank you. This is one of my biggest pet peeves about breast cancer awareness.

      I think the risk of prostate cancer is higher by a considerable margin. A quick Googling for information got me: 18% for prostate cancer, 14.3% for breast cancer. Plus, how many more men die from it because they leave it untreated?

      As one previous poster noted, Prostate Cancer Awareness Month was September. Not a great sign for your awareness-month when nobody knows when it is.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    9. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by Thrip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What do you mean by "out there"? Who do you expect to make that effort? I'm no expert on the subject, but it seems to me that a lot of breast cancer survivors have been very vocal in trying to raise awareness, whereas prostate cancer survivors tend not to be overly eager to talk about it. Let's face it, men choose to suffer in silence because our macho image is more important to us than our health. And if some guy tries to get me to wear a ribbon or buy a teddy bear in support of prostates everywhere, I'm just not going to be very receptive.

      --
      I'm awake! The answer is BONK!
    10. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      I think it boils down to this:

      How do you check to see if a woman has breast cancer? Feel them up! Conclusion: Cool, sign me up!

      How do you check to see if a man has prostate cancer? Shove a finger or three up their ass! Conclusion: Whoa buddy, no thanks!

    11. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by mordors9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are certainly correct about women organizing and making breast cancer more of a cause celebre than prostate cancer or for that matter lung cancer or heart disease. And I agree it shouldn't be an us against them situation. Unfortunately the competition for research dollars does seem to be a zero sum game. It also reminds me of the outrage that arose a few decades ago when women's groups raised the awareness of the American public that little girl's weren't being treated fairly in the schools. Now girls are graduating high school and going to college at a much higher rate than boys. There seems to be very little concern about that either.

    12. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by arth1 · · Score: 1
      The only reason breast cancer awareness is so high is because women, WOMEN, organized themselves and brought both the public and government's attention to it.

      And the only reason they could succeed with this is because men care about women and thus can be mobilised. This is not the case for male health, where women and men could hardly care less unless they themselves are impacted. I'm not sure whether this is cultural or hardwired, but take a look at plain hard facts and figures, and you'll see this pattern emerge almost universally. Why are there about two orders of magnitude as many gynecologists as andrologists? Why were cars almost without safety features until there was a substantial amount of female drivers? Why is there a whole lot more research on rheumatoid arthritis (which more women get) than ankylosing spondylitis (which more men get)?

      Is it discrimination? Probably, but men are doing it to themselves too, by deliberately or unconsciously focusing their efforts on protection on women and children.

      Regards,
      --
      *Art
    13. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by mapmaker · · Score: 1

      Not sure, but I can tell you the color for colon cancer...

    14. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by snarkth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For the most part, males don't discuss this sort of thing in quite the detail women do, when it comes to body functions. It's a fundamentally old, and stupid, social firewall rule. *snarky*

    15. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but prostate cancer is very slow growing and easily treated if you catch it early. Furthermore, if the patient is quite old the doctor may not treat it at all since prostate cancer takes a long, long time to develop.

      I get prostate exams yearly, or more often if you count what my boyfriend does ;-)

    16. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      It's not a competition, but breast cancer kills more women each year than prostate cancer kills men. It generally strikes younger and treatment is more disfiguring. All in all, I'm happy to have to deal with prostate cancer rather than breast cancer although I know that if I live long enough I'm sure to get it eventually. Fighting the slow effects of andropause with hormone replacement is likely to have a very beneficial effect on prostate cancer (although that opinion is controversial).

    17. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What would you rather talk about, breasts or prostates? I think you have your answer! That, or you have a rodent fetish...

    18. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by t-twisted · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you up if I could because that is an incredibly good point.

    19. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      Um, actually, all treatments for prostate cancer cause either temporary or permanent impotence. Indeed, it's only in the last decade that treatments have emerged for which there's any hope for subsequent erectile function. More than that, all the surgical alternatives for early stage prostate cancer cause functional infertility (because they cause all sperm to be forced back into the abdominal cavity, leading to a spectacular drop in the number of sperm released in ejaculate.)

      However, the horror that prostate cancer causes is really neither here nor there. Breast cancer used to be the single most frequent cause of cancer death in women, and it needs to be defeated.

    20. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by whoppers · · Score: 1

      My father recently survived a bout with prostate cancer and I haven't discussed it for more than 2 minutes with him. Simple fact is the prostate isn't something that anyone sees or really cares about until there is a problem, but breasts? I've already turned one website pink and now I'm looking for a pink phpbb theme.

    21. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by dorianh49 · · Score: 1
      --
      Gravity is a contributing factor in nearly 73 percent of all accidents involving falling objects. -Dave Barry
    22. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by wwwillem · · Score: 1
      But for some reason there isn't the same concern for it.


      Maybe breasts are just more beautiful and attractive than prostates. :-)

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    23. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by cyberwench · · Score: 1

      To some extent, the body part affected doesn't help things. Breasts do seem to be almost universally appealing. It's not like you can really stick a picture of a prostate up on a billboard and have people think "Oh, the prostates are being affected! We must mobilize!" If, instead of prostate cancer, men got penis cancer, I think there'd be a lot more interest. Part of it is because it's an internal part, as opposed to one we see every day. Part of it is societal hangups about that region of the body.

      Women don't _like_ getting their breasts squished for a scan. However, a rather large proportion of men feel horrifically violated at having someone poke up their ass. (As far as I can tell, as a woman I'm just going on my perceptions here.) Sure, some men see it as necessary, but a lot just refuse to even think about it.

      As a result of getting some pretty awful health information, women mobilized to make sure that there was accurate info out there - perhaps as a result of this, more women are aware of their health. Still, it seems like a lot of the medical studies are done on men only - which, as someone mentioned, is why the whole issue of women and heart attacks became a huge problem. Ten, twenty years ago, women didn't have heart attacks... because the symptoms they had didn't match the symptoms men had.

      Overall, my impression is that the efforts women have put into trying to get some balance in health care have helped - but I honestly don't think that they've tipped the scales over in favor of women.

      --
      ~ Leilah
    24. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      You've got it all wrong. He's my specially trained gerbil to .. uh .. detect and eat cancer.

      Yeah.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    25. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your post. It killed my pathetic criticism of the issue.

    26. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1
      I always make that point too. Prostate cancer is as prevalent in males as breast cancer is in females, and kills about the same number of people too. But for some reason there isn't the same concern for it.

      Simple explanation: We ALL (women and men alike) love breasts, so breast cancer seems extra horrible. We think about prostates a LOT less, so prostate cancer gets less attention. Seriously. No one notices if some species of slime mold or an ugly crustacean goes extinct, but we set aside protected habitat for cute, furry animals and butterflies.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    27. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by DeadChobi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Totally ditching my mod points for this, but I thought I'd chime in and say that the proctologist gives you a pill that will cause you not to remember a few hours after taking the pill, then goes to work. So yes, even though you will be horribly violated, you will not remember a damn thing. Also, they no long violate you with a metal bar as was the norm several years ago. Now they do it with a thin flexible tube and a micro camera.

      And you're right about the bias toward men in health studies. Up until the latter half of the last century there were hardly any studies done on women. In the 19th century medical science thought women were less intelligent than men because they had smaller brains, even. If anything, I think we need to devote our attention equally across the board.

      Something that bothers me about the feminist movement is that it circulates some pretty heavily women-centric views. An earlier poster mentioned that there was a large social movement to focus on how girls were treated in education more than boys, and as a result there are far more women graduating high school and going to college. My view of this situation is that there are some things in which we tend to overcorrect, and other things which need more correction. The gender bias in health care needs more correction, but the gender bias in education seems to swing in the other direction, with a few exceptions like the need for more girls to become science/engineering majors.

      In general there's a lot more support for girls and women than there is for men in education. Maybe I'm missing out on a few opportunities, but I've noticed also that women tend to be considered a minority for the purposes of funding, completely ignoring the fact that women and men tend to be about equal parts of the population. I've seen plenty of girls scholarships, but I've not seen one mens scholarship, so it seems to me that there is a significant bias there.

      End speculation based on specious evidence.

      --
      SRSLY.
    28. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Out of interest, does it matter if 75% of research patients are male? Don't we pretty much all have the same hearts? (Then again..)

    29. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Hi Mr. Gere! Who would have thought a famous actor like you read Slashdot?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    30. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by Jupiter+Jones · · Score: 1
      yet heart disease is the #1 killer of women, too.
      And, as laudable as this breast-cancer-awareness effort is, that's the message that's getting lost in all this. I don't mean to downplay breast cancer. But I wonder if that's really where our awareness efforts should go. Is there any woman out there who doesn't know that A) breast cancer exists or that B) they should be on the lookout for signs of breast cancer?

      In fact, I bet if you were ask anyone (male or female) what the #1 killer of women is, most would incorrectly say "breast cancer". All this awareness is kind of backfiring in a way. So, I'll say it again, in case anyone missed it:

      Ladies, pink web pages aside, the average woman is more likely to die of heart disease.

      Of course, the same healthy lifestyle choices (healthy diet/get some exercise/don't smoke/etc.) that help reduce the risk of heart disease also can reduce the risks of all types of cancer.
    31. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1, Troll

      Oh yes, so much physical activity is involved in watching football! And so much mental activity as well!!!!!!!!!!
      I'm sorry, but spectator sports are moronic.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    32. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Side-effects. 'Nuff said.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    33. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by gryf · · Score: 1
      Since breast cancer is not even among the top three causes of natural death among women, but breast cancer is undeniably female specific, it does appear to me to be a sexist issue. If these pink promoters were worried about saving the largest number of women's lives, let alone lives in general, they'd promote heart disease awareness.

      According to the CDC, the mortality rate of breast cancer is 1/8 of heart disease for women. So putting any kind of spotlight on breast cancer is merely a way to emphasize women, not a serious attempt to address important health issues.


      Go to the CDC (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/health_data_for_all_ages. htm), and search on breast cancer.

      --

      #-#
      Ad Astra Per Aspera
      A rough road leads to the stars
    34. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by russotto · · Score: 1

      While men and women are roughly equal in heart disease totals, men are still twice as likely to have a heart attack. A fact unaccountably omitted by the site you cited. Statistics -- check out tables 15A and 15B.

    35. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1
      Why were cars almost without safety features until there was a substantial amount of female drivers?
      If car safety features were made for women, then why are airbags designed for the average height and weight of men, so that small women can get hurt or even killed by them?
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    36. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1
      I've not seen one mens scholarship


      I don't think it's technically gender-based, but not too many women get full scholarships to play football, heh.
      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    37. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by SachiCALaw · · Score: 1

      Not at all. I'm a woman and I've given "prostate exams" to a few guys in my time. ;-) The men who are secure enough in their sexuality to do this gain a lot of enjoyment.

    38. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by SachiCALaw · · Score: 1

      I was an attorney for the U of WA and handled a lot of scholarship issues. Almost all the women's scholarships (not girls by that point!) were funded ages ago, from the days when gender disparity WAS an issue. When I was there from 1994-2003, because of Title IX of the Education Amendments (which requires gender equality), the University was almost always requiring new scholarships to be gender-neutral, because any gender-specific scholarships were difficult to award.

      The growing imbalance toward women in higher education may not yet be of concern for the general public but it most certainly is something that the colleges and universities are aware of and are trying to handle, both in house and in collaboration with their peers in the K-12 systems. Education in this country is complex and intertwined, for both good and bad.

    39. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Every prostate exam I've had involved a single finger and a few seconds. The most I recieved for that was some lube and a pat on the back. The camera version is a colonoscopy and I've had one of those, too. I don't remember the colonoscopy due to the drugs and it's probably a good thing. I saw pictures though ;-)

    40. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by Jearil · · Score: 1

      But that has nothing to do with learning in a school..

      I've known women who have gone to college on sports scholarships (I went to school with a few of them). Mostly for soccar, but a few in other sports like volleyball and diving. So while women may not be getting football scholarships, and probably not as many sports scholarships as men, they are getting some of them.

      The GP mentioned scholarships targeted towards women to get a degree, and treated them as a minority group. I agree with the GP that it does seem biased that there are so many woman's scolarships with hardly any mens scholarships, considering that there are more woman than men in the population, and more woman then men going to college in the US.

      However, I'm not going to say we should start ignoring girls and heap attention onto boys, that will just get us back to where we started. But at some point, we'll need to make sure that no one is at a disadvantage in the educational field by giving equal opportunities to both genders, which should either include creating more mens scholarships, or opening up some womens-only scholarships to both genders.

    41. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      I think it's misguided to be "bitter" that one group garners more attention than the other, when one group isn't doing as much as the other to bring attention, publicity and resources to their cause.

      I think it's misguided that the government amasses all these resources through legalized theft ("taxation") and then offers them up to whoever makes the noise and gets the best PR, mostly so that politicians can claim they did "favors" to everyone by making the resources available, even though the resources were taken from causes we will never see, which might have even been more important.

    42. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Guns don't kill people, people kill people.
      Guns don't protect people, people protect people.

      Yup, passes the logic tests. Guns are just a tool that augments our ability to fight. Of course there are others who would harm us that have tools for the same purpose. Those others have no scruples that prevent them from using outlawed tools. The result of this is that the outlawing the best tools takes them out of the hands of law abiding citizens while leaving them in the hands of those who have no respect for the law. The only way this wouldn't be true is law enforcement were effective and any wild teen who breaks the law daily can tell you how many crimes out of a thousand the police even know occurred, let alone catch the bad guy.

      There are plenty of bad guys to worry about. The government of course is number one. Leaving citizens the ability to repel the powers at be was the reason that the rebels who just repelled the powers at be thought it was important that citizens be allowed to bear arms. In the modern day this should mean tanks and rocket launchers are protected. Criminals are the more PC opponent of the day and very real. Countries with mandatory possession have much lower crime rates than countries with strict gun laws. Terrorism in particular is widespread in countries with strict gun laws (I say this as someone who is entirely opposed to the war on terror, this just happens to be a legitimate reference to terrorism).

      About this time someone brings out a ridiculous reference to a three year old with an Uzi. After all, lets bring children into an argument that has nothing to do with children.

      Unless the two party system is a way of exploiting the masses the division on this issue doesn't even make sense. Regulating guns is a huge step in the direction of a police state. That seems to be more in line with the right wing agenda. The result is that we get a weakened constitution (both parties) police powers that trample rights (right) and gun control laws that increase crime and eliminate the peoples ability to defend themselves against threats (like violent criminals and terrorists) (left) and the end result is a people that are powerless to resist the corrupt forces that run the nation.

    43. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1

      You're reading a lot more into my comment than was actually written. The GP said "I've not seen one mens (sic) scholarship" (which could actually mean the submitter has seen either zero or at least two men's scholarships), so I merely pointed out one that is effectively a men-only scholarship.

      However, I am curious what you mean. You seem to be saying that althetic scholarships have "nothing to do with learning" or aren't "targeted towards women to get a degree". That implies that athletic scholarships don't have academic performance requirements, but they do!

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    44. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by Shadowlore · · Score: 1
      Your analysis is correct and precisely incorrect as well. Anytime WOMEN get together and organize, it is politically OK, even great.. After all, they are women. However, when MEN do it is is SEXIST. Obviously, I am referring to the US. it may be the case in otehr ocuntries, but my past experience tells me it is likely not the case.

      In a society where men are not allowed have men-only places, but women are allowed and even encouraged to have women-only places, it is not suprising that men don't organize a prostate cancer press corps. First, the history of BCA in the US started with a few men, then spread by famous women publically acknowledging their Breast Cancer - mostly actresses who's appearance would have a pivotal role in their livelihood. How many old men have a cause for "coming out" with colon cancer?

      Yes, prostate cancer is high among men, it's the second leading cancer for men. For every 3 men who die of prostate cancer, 4 women die of breast cancer, so it's almost, but not quite, equal.

      Actually, the numbers you are looking for are:

      According to the CDC:

      Breast cancer:
      * The incidence rate for the United States is 124.9; state incidence rates range from 109.0 to 147.8; approximately 53% of states have incidence rates at or above the national rate.
      * The death rate for the United States is 25.5; state death rates range from 16.2 to 34.3; approximately 47% of states have death rates at or above the national rate.

      Prostate cancer:
      * The incidence rate for the United States is 161.2; state incidence rates range from 106.1 to 217.1; approximately 58% of states have incidence rates at or above the national rate.
      * The death rate for the United States is 28.1; state death rates range from 17.6 to 51.8; approximately 59% of states have death rates at or above the national rate.

      Don't be upset because a group of people got organized. Organize yourself and get out there.

      The problem with this theory is that women did not organize themselves. A handful of celebrities essentially did it. There never has been a grass roots breast cancer thing. What grassroots-ness (?) there is, is stupid little do-nothing things like pink ribbons and turning your website pink for a day, week, or even month/year. Things that make people feel good but don't really do anything. That is what our society is trending towards. We learned it from the people we put in office.

      Furthermore, another crucial difference between prostate and breast cancers is that the jury is still out on whether early detection leads to a better result in prostate cancer. It is a proven technique for lowering the suffering and mortality of breast cancer, but the evidence does not support such a conclusion for prostate cancer. I suspect this is a key aspect in the lack of a national prostate awareness campaign. What are you going to do, tell men to get a finger shoved up their hole for something that we don't know yet if it matters that you know about it? particularly since the act of going looking may cause damage? Honestly, do you expect men to put out a brochure telling them how to stick their finger up their arse and feel around? Compare that with the instructions for women for self-examination.

      Another factor is that it is deemed "OK" to talk about breasts/boobs on TV, but not your butthole. And face it, that is the interface to the prostate. Men are subject to many jokes about getting your prostate exam. There are few jokes about women getting their breasts examined. What jokes there are consist of men wanting to do them.

      Ultimately, a lot of it is about money. And sadly, political money comes at a price. In this case that price is less effective research into solutions and understanding. The money for BC tends toward "awareness". So everyone becomes "aware" of breast cancer, but those who need to know about i

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    45. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by Jearil · · Score: 1

      Appologies, that wasn't my intention. I do understand that going to school on a football scholarship or whatever other sport doesn't mean you get a free ride with a 1.0GPA. I stated that poorly.

      My comment was more geared towards scholarships designed around the educational atmosphere. A sports scholarship isn't giving you money because you're a genuis in math, it's because you can run fast, or throw a ball well.. or whatever. Both genders have them, and I'll agree that men probably end up with more of them, but I doubt it's to as high of a level as it once was due to a lot of proactive movements reguarding women in sports.

      I doubt the submitter meant he had seen two or more men's scholarships, as there would be no reason to lay such a misleading claim if not to verify it with a greater than 0 number. My point was that the bias for academic scholarships is leaning more towards women than men, which in the future could lead men to have a disadvantage in the work force due to less education and training. I also believe that our society, at this point, would shun anyone who proposed the idea that men were being treated unequally, as it would be taken as a sign of someone wanting to repress women and their rights.

      I believe in women's rights, and that they should have the same opportunities as men. I also believe that in the past they weren't given those opportunities and such things need to be fixed. However, I also believe that it's important not to "over-fix" things towards one group of people to the detriment of another, where we create the same situation as earlier but in reverse.

    46. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Countries with mandatory possession have much lower crime rates than countries with strict gun laws.

      And yet, the US has the largest prison population per capita of any country in the world. I appreciate that you don't have mandatory gun possession, but lots of countries have far stricter control and yet enjoy lower crime rates.

    47. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I stole this line from an Everything2 node of the same name. I agree with the argument about only disarming the good guys, I just don't agree with the pro-gun "It's for a Revolution" line. Gun-owners have had a very bad track-records with actually protecting our freedoms, with exactly 0 examples after 1800. Even if you had the right to buy rocket launchers and tanks there's still the money issue. In the olden times having more money was nowhere near as much of an advantage as it is now.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    48. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's a light blue/robin's egg blue. :\ My dad had it when he died, but he didn't die from it.

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    49. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by brre · · Score: 1
      The strangely unfamous cancer is lung cancer. It has been called the invisible disease.

      Lung cancer kills more women than breast cancer. Lung cancer has killed more women than breast cancer every year since 1987. And the gap is widening: lung cancer deaths in women are increasing. CDC TFK

      Lung Cancer kills more women every year than breast, uterine, and ovarian cancers combined. Joan's Legacy

      "There are four major cancers that account for over 50 percent of cancer deaths. Far and away, the most important in both men and women is lung cancer." PBS online focus

      Yet women's magazines and other media pass out gobs and slathers of information on breast cancer. They hardly ever even mention lung cancer. By an amazing coincidence, they run a lot of tobacco product advertising. ACSH

      Oh wait, it's not a coincidence: NIH

    50. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1

      You make good points I can agree with.

      But this is Slashdot, so I feel like I have to turn in my badge or something... :-)

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    51. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "And yet, the US has the largest prison population per capita of any country in the world."

      The US has very strict gun laws that need serious relaxing. You are actually supporting my position not fighting it. In fact, strict laws create longer prison sentences and create additional criminals because people are arrested for breaking those laws. That is logically sound but still isn't really why US prison populations are so large. The reason US prison populations are so high is because of silly drug laws. 60% (if I recall correctly) of the population in US prisons are black males convicted of drug offenses.

    52. Re:Strangely unfamous cancer by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "I just don't agree with the pro-gun "It's for a Revolution" line. Gun-owners have had a very bad track-records with actually protecting our freedoms, with exactly 0 examples after 1800. Even if you had the right to buy rocket launchers and tanks there's still the money issue."

      I could make an argument about pooling resources combined with the dramatically lower prices you would see with increased demand and an elimination of gun regulation and licensing (Handguns could go from $550 to $50, less popular arms would see less dramatic drops). But, viability really isn't the point. Whether the use of guns to overcome government corruption in modern times is viable or not does not change the spirit of the amendment. The amendment clearly demonstrates that leaving the citizens a way to depose the government or part of the government by force is part of the fundamental principles of the nation. If guns aren't viable then not only should restrictions on the guns be removed but any additional rights and protections that need to be added to make sure the citizens of the nation have this ability should be granted.

  5. I dont see slashdot doing it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    IT's funny how Slashdot will post the story, but not do the deed...

    makes ya think...

    First post?

    1. Re:I dont see slashdot doing it! by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1
      IT's funny how Slashdot will post the story, but not do the deed... makes ya think...

      ...and makes you grateful that at least /. doesn't partake in dumb pseudo-movements like caring about an important topic for 1/12 of the year, flying a flag on July 4 and Flag Day (but not caring the other 363 or 364 days of the year), or pasting dumb ribbons everywhere for every cause you can think up.

      Besides, the whopping "nearly 150 sites" already going pink must have gotten the word out to the entire web-viewing community by now, anyway.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  6. Not ponies by Kuku_monroe · · Score: 4, Funny

    OMG, Cancer!!!

    --
    //WR
    1. Re:Not ponies by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      I was disappointed at myself for laughing at that.

    2. Re:Not ponies by Kabal` · · Score: 1

      I'm not.

    3. Re:Not ponies by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Why? Making jokes and laughing about things is just one way of dealing with unpleasant or frightening things.

      One of my friends at university had chemo for Hodgkin's disease. One of my ex's friends has had three operations for throat cancer; if the last one didn't get it all, there's probably nothing more that they can do. As it is, she has an ugly scar on her throat and has difficulty speaking because they had to remove part of her tongue. She's married with a young daughter.

      Don't get me wrong, I care deeply, but I'm damned if I'm going to stop laughing at silly jokes just because it's a serious subject. Sometimes laughing is all you can do.

  7. I'm in what else can I do? by josepha48 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    less than two years ago one of my sisters was diagnosed with breast cancer. Today I just discovered my other sister has breast cancer. It's spread to her bones, so the doctors are treating her with chemo. She's 47!

    So what's the #xxxxxx code for pink or do we just use 'pink' ( which is kinda dark ).

    What else can we do?

    BTW: guys, get your selves checked for prostate cancer!

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

    1. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      BTW: guys, get your selves checked for prostate cancer!

      And check yourself for testicular cancer. It only takes a minute and it might save your life.

      --A Survivor

    2. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      BTW: guys, get your selves checked for prostate cancer!

      That's why my website is "Going Brown For October"!

    3. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by thewiz · · Score: 1

      So what's the #xxxxxx code for pink or do we just use 'pink' ( which is kinda dark ).

      Check here http://www.htmlvalidator.com/htmlval/fontsandcolor s.html for a selection of pinks.

      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    4. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by Speare · · Score: 4, Informative
      If you are somehow GIMP-challenged to the point of not understanding the eyedropper tool, here are a few I snagged from graphics on a breast cancer site:
      • #ff99cc
      • #eeaac3
      • #f594cb
      • #f197c0
      • #fbd9e1
      • #f50f95
      The first one is a "safe 216" color, which I threw in as a bonus for the really ancient websites and video cards stuck in 256-color modes.
      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    5. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by davidc · · Score: 1

      #ffcccc looks good.

    6. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      So what's the #xxxxxx code for pink or do we just use 'pink' ( which is kinda dark ).

      Yeah; I was wondering about that. You'd think they'd have a standard shade. So I followed a few of the links, and looked around the source. I didn't find a #xxxxxx number anywhere.

      When I re-enabled the web pages' colors, I didn't find many that were pink, and those seem to have done it with a background image. Hmmm ...

      Anyone know if there's a standard pink here, and what its RGB values are?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    7. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by Firehed · · Score: 4, Funny

      GIMP-challenged? They *really* need to change the name.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    8. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Just use whatever colour of pink you find looks good. 99% of people have improperly calibrated monitors and won't see the correct color anyway, so it's not like it matters.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by guaigean · · Score: 1

      Those web safe colors aren't there just because people can only view 256 colors. They are there because different monitors, hardware, etc. can render colors slightly different. These 256 are supposed to be guaranteed to view the same on Mac's, PC's, and various monitors, that's why they're important.

      --
      Microsoft Sucks, F/OSS Rocks. I get mod points now right?
    10. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by neoform · · Score: 1

      http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/ they've got a "help defeat cancer" program.. i run it on all my computers as the screen saver..

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    11. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I like #ffbbbb a tad better. but I'm on a washed out LCD.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    12. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

      My best friend was 18 when she was diagnosed, and is now a survivor (in her 30's). I added a pink entry to our site to support the Yound Survival Coalition. ( http://www.bigattichouse.com/ )

      --
      meh
    13. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by Speare · · Score: 1

      The safe 216 has nothing to do with colors that appear the same on all displays. There can be no such "guarantee" of similar appearance on different hardware. It has to do with the fact that a byte can only index so many colors, so a simple even distribution of 6^3 colors fits within a palette of 2^8.

      To make the colors produced by two displays (even of the same make and model) look alike, you need much more math to (1) profile the abilities and biases of the device in question, and (2) a video card which can take such a profile and compensate for it in the video signal. Even then, you still can't guarantee that the devices will be able to cover anywhere near the same gamut.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    14. Re:I'm in what else can I do? by tyldis · · Score: 1

      While we are doing good deeds: using textual representation of the colours is deprecated.

  8. Color me confused by BearRanger · · Score: 1

    You can go pink, but don't be surprised if someone thinks it's for National Coming Out Day. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Coming_Out_D ay/

    1. Re:Color me confused by arth1 · · Score: 3, Informative
      You can go pink, but don't be surprised if someone thinks it's for National Coming Out Day.

      This comment makes more sense if you know that in much of the industrialised world, colours do not have the same symbolism as in the US:

      US: pink = breast cancer, rainbow = gay, red = liberals, blue = democrats
      Europe: pink = gay, rainbow = anti-racism, red = socialists, blue = conservatives

      I'm sure there's plenty of other examples too, but keep in mind that not everyone sees a pink (or other coloured) ribbon (or other symbols) the same way.

      Regards,
      --
      *Art
    2. Re:Color me confused by freakmn · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the US, red = conservatives (republicans) and blue = liberals (democrats). I don't know if it's a typo, or if you didn't know. But the color (or colour) difference is strange. I would suppose there's more, and I'm curious to find out what they are.

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    3. Re:Color me confused by rblum · · Score: 1

      Read Apple's Human Interface Guidelines - they have a whole section on color and i18n, IIRC

    4. Re:Color me confused by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was a typo -- of course "red = republican" in the US.
      Thanks :-)

  9. Breasts by Tx · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm all sypathetic for cancer sufferers of course, but I have to say I'm personally much more interested in non-cancerous mammaries. I vote we have a National Breast Awareness month (without the cancer) next month. Dunno what color we should turn our websites for that though, I would've said pink, but apparently it's been taken :).

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
    1. Re:Breasts by nacturation · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Theres a time and a place for jokes, but this is a rather serious thing which could one day kill you. Being a little horny asshole who wants to see porn isn't an important thing.

      Lighten up. Seeing breasts != porn. Seeing people fucking == porn. And many things could one day kill you... should we be serious about everything and just stop joking altogether?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Breasts by springbox · · Score: 1

      You seem to be plenty aware of breasts. Any more awareness might cause an explosion. (You could stare at your chest for a while, but it might not be as exciting.)

    3. Re:Breasts by r3m0t · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm seeing advertisement in the UK. I think it's just one day/week for most people, and a whole month for schools.

    4. Re:Breasts by eikonos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I vote we have a National Breast Awareness month (without the cancer) next month.

      I like your idea, but maybe we can just use the other eleven months to celebrate breasts without cancer? ;)

    5. Re:Breasts by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1
      I'm all sypathetic for cancer sufferers of course, but I have to say I'm personally much more interested in non-cancerous mammaries.

      I agree with your position, but is this not slashdot? Most geeks are not too picky and will take any boobs they can get their hands on. Cancerous breasts need attention, too!

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    6. Re:Breasts by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Actually seeing people fucking could possibly equal sexual education, but hey whatever floats your boat.

    7. Re:Breasts by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      There have even been people who suggest that if men got breast cancer it would have been cured by now!

      Men do get breast cancer. Nowhere near as many, but it does happen, and some die of it.

    8. Re:Breasts by mutterc · · Score: 1

      I heard a while back about a local Hooters hosting some event or other to benefit breast cancer research.

      I thought that was kind of cool, actually.

  10. questioning its use by xIcemanx · · Score: 4, Funny

    We should stop celebrating breast cancer awareness and start celebrating breast awareness. Millions of lives are tragically affected by unawareness of the full size and scope of these breasts. Failure to screen breasts early and often can lead to a rapid deterioration of sexy roles and a premature end to one's film career. Regular examination of breasts needs to be an important part of people's lives.

    1. Re:questioning its use by MisterSquiddy · · Score: 1

      My dick is already pink in awareness.

    2. Re:questioning its use by GrumpySimon · · Score: 1

      -1 too much information

    3. Re:questioning its use by sixside · · Score: 1

      I think that's what the site MyFreeImplants.com is all about (who also went pink this month). Examine boobs, and then chip in a few bucks to invest in some breasts and help a girl get implants.

  11. November is Gangrene Month by MisterSquiddy · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to turn your websites black and white. Oh, you did already.

  12. Breast Awareness by jenniferj · · Score: 1

    For the ultimate in both Breast Cancer awareness and just plain old awareness of breasts, be sure to visit this Fifth Annual Boobiethon (http://boobiethon.com/) - women baring their breasts for cancer awareness... not to be missed! You can say you helped out the fight against cancer when you donate to see all the wonderful boobies! :)

    1. Re:Breast Awareness by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      It's not every day you see a low Slashdot ID user named JenniferJ being excited about boobiethons!

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  13. Finally, a sequel! by njh · · Score: 1

    "The Hunt for Pink October"

    1. Re:Finally, a sequel! by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      Ah, so you like submarine movies?

      "Crimson Tide" - brought to you by - Tampax!

  14. Re:Guys??? by treeves · · Score: 1

    A guy where I worked five years ago got breast cancer. He'd had some other cancer as well. Yes, men can get breast cancer, it's just quite rare.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  15. Re:Guys??? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    Men have breasts, they just don't develope in the same way. Women's breasts contain fat basicly, where as guys don't contain the same amount other wise we're identical. Men can even produce milk is correctly stimulated..

    --
    I like muppets.
  16. Where the hell is Carcinogen Awareness Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm all for Breast Cancer Awareness, don't get me wrong, but how about we promote prevention instead of detection once in a while?

    1. Re:Where the hell is Carcinogen Awareness Day? by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because Breast Cancer is less linked to a Carcinogen than just plain unfortunate luck to be born into a family with a high risk of breast cancer.

      My mother, warning me of breast cancer, told me about a woman at her work, who had a radical mastectomy to prevent herself from developing breast cancer, because it was so prevalent in her family. Well, it sort of worked, she didn't get breast cancer in her breasts where she had a chance of detecting it through breast exams, rather it directly matastecized and attacked her body right away.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
  17. "Awareness"? by Hao+Wu · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What does awareness do except make people falsely believe that something is being done about a problem?

    "Awareness" is organized complacency.

    If you want to fight breast cancer, then do it in a laboratory or hospital setting - someplace where caring actually matters. (...and stick your "pink-website" concept back up your ass where it came from...)

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
    1. Re:"Awareness"? by springbox · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. However, the "awareness" items that are sold in stores contribute to meaningful things like research. Pink websites don't have the same effect unless all of the ad revenue is being donated to some laboratory. If people just promote awareness without actually helping a cause, then you're right, they can stick their pink site up their ass, because it's not helping anyone. The OMG PONIES theme could be used out of spite.

    2. Re:"Awareness"? by davidc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Awareness might make the difference between a woman having a mammogram, or not.

      Let's not be ignorant about this: screening and early detection can make a huge difference in breast cancer (others, too!). I just don't agree that awareness makes people think they are safe. And, yes, something is being done about the problem, starting with screening.

      Every bit of publicity helps. Please don't belittle educational programs. Grass-roots education for regular screening arguably helps as much as the latest whiz-bang chemotherapeutic agent. If you catch it early, you markedly improve survival rates.

    3. Re:"Awareness"? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      The "let's do something symbolic so we don't have to think about it anymore" is best exemplified in the Asylum Street Spankers' schtick on those stupid "support our troops" car magnets, which neither pro-war nor anti-war people find particularly useful.

      (I'm trying not to flamebait here...if you want to discuss the ribbons, use the comment section of the youtube link...)

      I made the same argument on my blog sometime back about those ubiquitous and jingoistic, yet vacuous, rubber wristbands.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    4. Re:"Awareness"? by nsmike · · Score: 1

      Okay, so let's have all of those women who organized so heavily for breast cancer awareness to use their combined resources to make a Cancer Awareness month. Let's make everyone aware that Lung cancer is preventable in most cases by not smoking. Prostate, breast, colon, and testicular cancer can be detected early with regular exams(I'm sure there are others, but those are the only ones I can think of at the moment). Why should those who are so devoted to breast cancer awareness be so single-minded? It's obviously worked with breast cancer, let's apply those resources to other cancers.

    5. Re:"Awareness"? by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      Every bit of publicity helps. Please don't belittle educational programs. Grass-roots education for regular screening arguably helps as much as the latest whiz-bang chemotherapeutic agent. If you catch it early, you markedly improve survival rates.

      No, every little bit doesn't help. But here is something that does: encourage women to breastfeed their children. The longer she breastfeeds the lower her risk goes, and by large proportions. A women who breastfeeds for a total of 6 years reduces her risk by two-thirds. Even short-term such as 6 months to two years reduces it by 11-25% For no money, with no drugs. Regular screening will catch it, but it is better to reduce/eliminate the risk. The majority of those women who are not already getting screenings are precisely those who can not afford treatments or screenings (yes some places do it for free).

      But if today's women were encouraged and (cue teenage-boy jokes here) aided in breastfeeding, they would not only lower their risk, but save more than enough money to get themselves checked out. Furthermore, if their child is female, they reduce her risk as well. While certainly not conclusive evidence in it's own right, the increase in breast cancer rates in developed contouries, particularly the US, coincides with the decrease in breast feeding. We don't yet understand all of the reasons why breastfeeding plays such a significant role. Realistically we don't have to. We do know it works, and works very well with no deleterious side effects to mother or baby, and a cornucopia of positive effects to both.

      You can also help out by fighting laws that disadvantage breastfeeding women. No amount of pink websites will make a difference. But if you put the information about how breastfeeding dramatically reduces the risk of breast cancer, you may actually teach someone something of value, and make a difference. If you follow it up with breastfeeding links such as http://www.breastfeeding.com/ and http://www.lalecheleague.com/ you will be doing an even better service.

      Breast cancer strikes one in eight women. Yet if every woman who could breastfeed did so, that number could drop to 1 in 16 in the first generation and 1 in 20 or better in the second.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  18. How much more awareness are you expecting? by Will_Malverson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is there any woman still out there not aware that sometimes her boobs can develop lumps that will kill her? If such an utterly clueless person exists, is turning websites pink really the best way to communicate with her?

    1. Re:How much more awareness are you expecting? by jacquems · · Score: 1

      Is there any person still out there not aware that smoking cigarattes will eventually kill them? Is there any person still out there not aware that they can be infected with HIV through unprotected sex or sharing needles? These utterly clueless people apparently do exist, because I see young people (young enough to have started after the dangers were known) smoking every day, and the rate of HIV infection is actually going up again now that people are becoming complacent about the AIDS crisis. Even if we're not so clueless as to be completely unaware of the facts, we do need a reminder every now and then that these things do happen, and that they could happen to us.

    2. Re:How much more awareness are you expecting? by NorthWestFLNative · · Score: 1
      Is there any woman still out there not aware that sometimes her boobs can develop lumps that will kill her? If such an utterly clueless person exists, is turning websites pink really the best way to communicate with her?

      That's not really the problem. Most women, at least in developed parts of the world, know that they can develop breast cancer. The problem is that the possibility of being diagnosed with breast cancer is terrifying. The women at highest risk were raised in an age where breast cancer wasn't a treatable disease. They've been told, but it hasn't yet sunk in that there are treatments (not cures) for breast cancer. They feel that the treatment is worse than the disease. They're scared to even get a mammogram. Unfortunately this leads to diagnosis at a much later stage in the illness. The earlier the illness is diagnosed, the easier it is to treat.

      Another problem is that people don't realize that even teenagers can get breast cancer (very rarely but my mother worked with a woman who had breast cancer at 19). Doctor's don't start recommending mammograms till a woman is over 40. There are women who get diagnosed with extensive breast cancer in their very first mammogram.

      As a side note, yes men can and do get breast cancer. It's usually diagnosed at a later stage then in women because men aren't screened for it. The surgeon who removed my tumor (stage 2 breast cancer) has also treated men with breast cancer.

  19. Re:Equal Billing? by beoba · · Score: 1

    It's not like this is a contest. With cancer research, everybody wins.

    --
    I am not a number - I am a free man!
  20. Not Pink Panther? by mh101 · · Score: 1

    My first thought on reading the title was that there was some sort of marketing campaign starting for The Pink Panther series of movies.

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  21. Netvibes by pile0nades · · Score: 1

    Netvibes' new Cinnamon release has a pink theme that looks pretty good.

  22. Why the focus on breast cancer? by windowpain · · Score: 4, Informative

    I lost a dear friend to breast cancer in 1998 but I think it's screwy to focus so much on it. Look at this PDF table from the National Cancer Institute. It shows that estimated deaths from digestive system cancers (136,180) will be more than triple the number of deaths from breast cancer (41,430) this year. Both figures are for both male and female deaths. Even when you look at just female deaths, digestive system cancers will kill half again as many women as breast cancer will (60,970 vs. 40,970).

    Another example of misplaced public health priorities due to the publicity machine.

    --
    Insert witty sig here.
    1. Re:Why the focus on breast cancer? by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think part of it is that breast cancer can be detected and treated early much easier than other cancers. Are there very good warning signs of digestive system cancers? If not, what will awareness do? Possibly get people to donate money is about all it can do. But if people learn how to check themselves for breast cancer and see a doctor if they find signs of it, they may actually be able to do something about it. It doesn't take much work to stay alert of the potentials of breast cancer. Awareness can go a long way. I'm not sure awareness can go quite as far with other types of cancer (except maybe skin cancer).

    2. Re:Why the focus on breast cancer? by sickmtbnutcase · · Score: 1

      I think it's because guys want to save the boobies!

      On a more serious note; my wife and I raced in the Komen Race for the cure in Milwaukee last weekend. Breast cancer hit close to home when her aunt was diagnosed a few weeks ago. Besides our $25 each to race, we raised $250 in donations. You know what, it felt damn good to do something; even if it wasn't a lot.

      We (and some friends) plan on doing the "Bowling for the Cure" this January as well. Cuz, bowling's what we do in Milwaukee when not drinking beer and eating cheese. And helping a little bit more sure won't hurt.

    3. Re:Why the focus on breast cancer? by maxume · · Score: 1

      It is a heckuva lot easier for women to self screen for breast cancer than it is to self screen for colon cancer.

      Also, if you look at incidence vs death, either breast cancer is more treatable, or the awareness program is working. A big part of being treatable is being caught early, so it is going to be pretty hard to seperate the two.

      Regarding public health priorities, it is at least as reasonble to look at $/life saved as it is to look at absolute deaths.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Why the focus on breast cancer? by Hahnsoo · · Score: 1

      The numbers don't lie, but they don't often say the message that you may be hearing. First of all, Breast Cancer has come a long way in so-called "Awareness" and education, such that early screening detects cases earlier and thus are more easily treatable. While I'm not sure how many women do self-exams monthly at home, I'm fairly certain that it's more than the population of people who dig around in their stool looking for blood after every bowel movement. On the higher end, both mammograms and colonoscopies are uncomfortable, but people are much less likely to put off getting a mammogram than they are to put off getting a colonoscopy. Advances in both chemotherapy and surgery have reduced morbidity and mortality, and lumpectomies (vs. mastectomies) are far less disfiguring, reducing the stigma of treatment. It's not perfect; it's not as remarkable as, say, the reduction of cervical cancer cases and deaths after the introduction of the Pap smear. But the priority on Breast Cancer is justified, and a good use of medical resources and publicity.

      A comparable example for men is testicular cancer. In my training (I Am Really A Doctor), I've noticed that men will let all sorts of crazy medical stuff slide, but when the jimmy sack is in trouble, they'll go to the hospital right away. It scares the beejezus out of men to find a "lump on a nut".

      The big "daddy, as far as cancer is Lung Cancer, for both sexes. But no matter how many times you tell someone to quit smoking, it's a tough cookie to crack. The average smoker will attempt to quit smoking about 7 times before succeeding, using a variety of methods. And most people quit after it's too late, and they are on the Emphysema wagon.

      But the real killer is cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Far and away the highest cause of morbidity and mortality in these United States.

    5. Re:Why the focus on breast cancer? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I would think the selection of which diseases to focus on would be based on the most common and the most preventable/treatable. How easily are digestive system cancers detected and treated as compared to breast cancer?

    6. Re:Why the focus on breast cancer? by NorthWestFLNative · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear about your wife's aunt's diagnosis. If she hasn't found it yet, the website http://www.breastcancer.org/ has a lot of information. It really helped me during my diagnosis and treatment last year.

  23. Token efforts yield token results. by 6350' · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe after October, we can have a bake-sale for the deficit!

  24. Disease Gap... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nothing disturbs me more about "charities" than the promotion of one disease over another.

    Besides breast cancer, we all hear about AIDS constantly, and calls for donations. Yet, AIDS research already recieves a disproportionally large ammount of money, if you look at the number of people who die from it, and the ammount spent on other serious diseases.

    Are there any organizations that you can donate to, that just tackle critical diseases at large, rather than having tunnel-vision on one single issue?

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Disease Gap... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Nothing disturbs me more about "charities" than the promotion of one disease over another.

      I hate to say it but this mentality is not only old but also very illogical. You fight the fights that you have a chance to win. There is no cure-all solution and focusing on diseases that we've had a great deal of success treating is money better spent due to patient recovery. Not only this but the research for a particular cancer is doubtlessly valuable to other cancer research.

      Are there any organizations that you can donate to, that just tackle critical diseases at large, rather than having tunnel-vision on one single issue?

      This would be akin to trying to hold back the winds using your hands.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Disease Gap... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Yet, AIDS research already recieves a disproportionally large ammount of money, if you look at the number of people who die from it

      There are a lot of fairly nasty diseases in Africa but AIDS is the one that is having the most impact.

    3. Re:Disease Gap... by tkw954 · · Score: 1
      Are there any organizations that you can donate to, that just tackle critical diseases at large, rather than having tunnel-vision on one single issue?

      Try your local medical research university. I'm sure that any of the researchers there have unfunded, but important, projects.

    4. Re:Disease Gap... by Hahnsoo · · Score: 1

      Do some homework, and find some organizations that focus on prevention of disease rather than cures. Prevention, far and away, is the best way to keep most of those nasty diseases (and most of those benign ones, too) at bay. Promote healthy eating choices (obesity being the big epidemic problem in the US), help out at blood drives (donating or otherwise), teach kids to use condoms if they really can't keep their hormones in check, those sort of things (which, by the way, includes screening for Breast Cancer *cough*). It really makes more of a difference than anything else.

    5. Re:Disease Gap... by westlake · · Score: 1
      AIDS research already recieves a disproportionally large ammount of money, if you look at the number of people who die from it, and the ammount spent on other serious diseases.

      Some statistics on AIDs:

      Over 42 million people are living with HIV/AIDS, and 74 percent of these infected people live in sub-Saharan Africa.

      There are 14,000 new infections every day (95 percent in developing countries). HIV/AIDS is a "disease of young people" with half of the 5 million new infections each year occurring among people ages 15 to 24.

      The UN estimates that, currently, there are 14 million AIDS orphans and that by 2010 there will be 25 million.

      By race, 54 percent of the new infections in the United States occur among African Americans, and 64 percent of the new infections in women occur in African American women.

      Half of all new infections in the United States occur in people 25 years of age or younger Vital Statistics

    6. Re:Disease Gap... by nido · · Score: 1
      good points... These charities are disinclined to actually "cure" the problem for which they raise money, as they'd be causing their own irrelevancy.

      Also, from the information I've read, both breast cancer and aids are non-issues.

      A large part of the breast cancer cases in the west stem from a single fasion accessory: the brassiere. Bras (especially the kind with underwires) restrict the flow of lymphatic fluid in the breast. See A Pinch of Cancer: Can Wearing a Bra Kill You?. Also worth noting is the theory that bracing the breasts (with a bra) causes them to sag moreso than they would without the artificial support, the theory being that the tendons wither away when the bra removes the need for them to hold the breast up. Or something like that.

      Well aware that their findings were "explosive," the Singers sent their survey results to the heads of America's most prestigious cancer organizations and institutes. None responded. Like the cancer business, the bra business is huge. Multiply how many worldwide women buy several $25 bras every year and you end up with a multiple of the $6 billion-a-year US bra business.

      Syd Singer says that establishment censorship of the bra-breast cancer connection is killing women. Pointing to the biggest commonality among breast cancer patients, he's emphatic that it's bra-squeezed lymphatics.

      Going bra-less for all occasions, Soma began dressing to de-emphasize her breasts. She also began regular breast massage and bicycle riding, vitamin and herbal supplementation, and drinking only purified water.

      Two months later, her lump disappeared.

      At the first frightening sign of a lump, an angry Syd Singer says, "women should take their bras off before they take their breasts off." Why wait, when you can liberate your lymphatics now.

      IF YOU MUST WEAR A BRA:

      Push-up and sports bras are out. Choose loose-fitting cotton bras. Make sure you can slip two fingers under the shoulder-straps and side-panels. The higher the side-panels, the more severe the restriction of major lymph nodes. Don't wear this disastrous device to sleep. Take it off at home. Massage your breasts every time you remove your bra. Sing your lymphatics into health -- or at least breathe deeply.

      Some cases of breast cancer are unrelated to the undergarment, of course, but this is a big point that gets overlooked.

      As for AIDS, the first cases in the U.S. were amongst homosexual drug users. Not exactly the country's healthiest population. To be diagnosed with AIDS in the U.S., someone has to test positive for HIV and have several other diseases too. The alternate theory is that HIV is really just a marker for some other problem, and not the cause of the problem itself - similar to a fever being indicative of having the flu. See this LA Times story on a HIV+ homosexual drug addict who passed on the usual drug therapy (AZT killed more patients than HIV ever did), and is doing just fine 17 years later.

      Malnutrition abounds in Africa... They don't do HIV tests in Africa ($), so the deaths from hunger/malnutrition/tuberculosis/etc get re-labeled as "AIDS". Seems to me to be a political thing. Africa would receive a 1000x more benefit from clean water and nutrition campaigns than AIDS drugs.
      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    7. Re:Disease Gap... by L+Fitzgerald+Sjoberg · · Score: 1

      Screw that, man. Why should diseases get all the money? I want to donate my money to an organization that solves problems, in general, without actually focusing on any particular problem.

      To really be fair, though, I'm going to insist that they not give my money to anyone who's trying to solve a specific problem, either. I want my dollars to go to people who are trying to solve every problem at once. That's the only way I can really be egalitarian.

      --
      If you don't want my koalas, baby, don't shake my eucalyptus tree.
    8. Re:Disease Gap... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      You fight the fights that you have a chance to win.

      And the "fights" that are the best marketed, are supposed to be the ones that "have a chance to win"? I don't buy it for a second.

      We have a chance to win ALL the fights (one at a time of course), and giving money to Breast Cancer research, in lieu of Heart Disease research, because of some clever marketing, is absolutely nonsensical.

      I'm certainly not a good enough at predicting the future to say that a cure for one is any closer than the other.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Disease Gap... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Over 42 million people are living with HIV/AIDS, and 74 percent of these infected people live in sub-Saharan Africa.

      There are 14,000 new infections every day (95 percent in developing countries).

      Some Statistics on CVD (Cardiovascular Disease)

      According to World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, in 2003, 16.7 million people around the globe die of CVD each year. This is over 29 percent of all deaths globally. (WHO, Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control. www..who.int)

      Today, men, women and children are at risk, and 80 percent of the burden is in low-and middle-income countries. By 2020 heart disease and stroke will become the leading cause of both death and disability worldwide, with the number of fatalities projected to increase to more than 20 million a year and to more than 24 million a year by 2030. (Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke, WHO, September 2004)

      80 percent of chronic disease deaths occur in low and middle income countries and half are women. Cardiovascular disease alone will kill five times as many people as HIV/AIDS in these countries. (Chronic Diseases and Their Common Risk Factors, WHO, Oct. 2005)

      http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?ident ifier=3001008

      By race, 54 percent of the new infections in the United States occur among African Americans, and 64 percent of the new infections in women occur in African American women.

      In case you're trying to imply racism...

      Leading Causes of Death for Black or African-American Males
      United States: 2003
      Cardiovascular Disease: 33.4
      Cancer: 21.9
      HIV/Aids: 3.5

      http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?ident ifier=3000927

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:Disease Gap... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Why should diseases get all the money? I want to donate my money to an organization that solves problems, in general,

      Even though you're obviously trolling, you're not far wrong. Things like nutrition and automotive safety improvements would save far more lives than any medications or treatments you can come up with.

      Donating a huge ammount of money for research on an issue that affects a tiny percentage of people, is insane. It's charity-mongering, rather than egalitarianism.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:Disease Gap... by jnovek · · Score: 1

      AIDS causes 9% of deaths worldwide each year. Many people don't notice because most of the people dying of AIDS have brown skin.

    12. Re:Disease Gap... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      I'm certainly not a good enough at predicting the future to say that a cure for one is any closer than the other.

      Again, it comes down to being able to treat a disease effectively. And to be 100% honest the entire "heart disease" crisis has come a long long way in the last 20 years. The real shame about heart disease is that in most cases it's preventable by some common sense tactics and getting one's ass off the couch for a few hours a week. Breast Cancer on the other hand? I'm sure there is some studies pointing to dietary habits cutting the chances of getting it but it's no where near the same thing as heart diseases association with the big mac, french fries and bowls of ice cream.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    13. Re:Disease Gap... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "Yet, AIDS research already recieves a disproportionally large ammount of money, if you look at the number of people who die from it, and the ammount spent on other serious diseases."

      I'd like to know your sources for making this claim. The information isn't easily obtained in a few moments of googling.

      In 2004, there were 3 million worldwide deaths from AIDS, 5 million new cases and 40 million cases total (don't know the likelihood of error in those numbers). Total funding for AIDS research in 2004 was $3.6B (about 45% from the USA for what it's worth). AIDS is the second leading killing among infectious diseases worldwide. I used 2004 because that's what I could find.

      Not sure what to contrast that with because you haven't said what disease is more worthy than breast cancer or AIDS. I suspect you are mistaken on your claim, but if there's a disease you feel is more worthy than breast cancer or AIDS, I'm sure the world will welcome your charitable efforts.

    14. Re:Disease Gap... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Breast Cancer on the other hand? I'm sure there is some studies pointing to dietary habits cutting the chances of getting it

      Another poster in this thread already linked to information that breast cancer, in many cases, is caused by constrictive bras. I heard about the results a couple years ago, so it must be rather well-known by now.

      it's no where near the same thing as heart diseases association with the big mac, french fries and bowls of ice cream.

      Heart Disease is more common in the 3rd world, where they don't have big macs, french fries, bowls of ice cream, time to sit around on a coutch... or even couches in many cases.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    15. Re:Disease Gap... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      AIDS is the second leading killing among infectious diseases worldwide.

      So AIDs is #2. Did you try to look-up #1?

      Not sure what to contrast that with because you haven't said what disease is more worthy than breast cancer or AIDS. I suspect you are mistaken on your claim, but if there's a disease you feel is more worthy than breast cancer or AIDS, I'm sure the world will welcome your charitable efforts.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=198559&cid=162 73359

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    16. Re:Disease Gap... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Another poster in this thread already linked to information that breast cancer, in many cases, is caused by constrictive bras. I heard about the results a couple years ago, so it must be rather well-known by now.

      Really? It seems to not be well known because it's unfounded. I know, I know, you'll find one or maybe two studies to the contrary... after the (doubtlessly) thousands of research projects into breast cancer a couple of studies does not note a trend.

      Heart Disease is more common in the 3rd world, where they don't have big macs, french fries, bowls of ice cream, time to sit around on a coutch... or even couches in many cases.

      That's odd, I was just over at the WHO and they seem to think differently than you. Check it out for yourself

      While the US is in a decrease for heart disease deaths it probably has more to do with advancements in medicine more than lifestyle changes. If you want to further dispute this please, quote sources. It's becoming hard to take you seriously. And when I say sources I don't mean blogs or cranks, if you think your argument is so substantial than serious reputable organizations should back your point of view.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    17. Re:Disease Gap... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Really?

      Funny you'd provide that link, considering that it directly disputes your own specious claim that breast cancer risk has nothing to do with nutrition, unlike (you say) CVD.

      Heart Disease is more common in the 3rd world, where they don't have big macs, french fries, bowls of ice cream, time to sit around on a coutch... or even couches in many cases.

      That's odd, I was just over at the WHO and they seem to think differently than you. Check it out for yourself [who.int]

      WTF?

      In what way does the WTO's report disagree with anything I've said?

      "Most of these deaths are in developing countries."
      http://www.who.int/entity/cardiovascular_diseases/ en/cvd_atlas_01_types.pdf

      You do know that "3rd world" and "developing" are synonomous, don't you?

      And second: I carefully quoted all my sources about CVD, none of which are "blogs" or anything of the sort. You just didn't bother to look at my other post in this thread where I went into great detail.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re:Disease Gap... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Funny you'd provide that link, considering that it directly disputes your own specious claim that breast cancer risk has nothing to do with nutrition, unlike (you say) CVD.

      Quote me where I said breast cancer had nothing to do with diet. I said "I'm sure there is some studies pointing to dietary habits cutting the chances of getting it but it's no where near the same thing as heart diseases association with the big mac, french fries and bowls of ice cream."

      If you're gonna try to bust on me at least have the good sense to read my posts.

      "Most of these deaths are in developing countries."

      Ok, so most of the 7 million deaths happen in developing countries, considering that WHO standards that's about 80% of the total world population and considering that other areas show that in the US and Russia alone there is over one million deaths? Don't play a numbers game, you've already lost seeings as where 2 developed nations already make at least 14% of the deaths that they're talking about.

      You just didn't bother to look at my other post in this thread where I went into great detail.

      Oh, so now I should go and research every post you've ever done? Get real. You don't even bother to read my posts that are in THIS thread.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    19. Re:Disease Gap... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "As for AIDS, the first cases in the U.S. were amongst homosexual drug users. Not exactly the country's healthiest population."

      No, they were among drug users and among homosexuals, not "homosexual drug users". It was AIDS that helped encourage the image that homosexuals were "not exactly the country's healthiest population". You are mistaken on that.

      The rest of your points are too irrational to respond to. Seems like nothing more than a big troll to me.

    20. Re:Disease Gap... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "So AIDs is #2. Did you try to look-up #1?"

      Of course I did. It was listed just above AIDS but it wasn't the topic of conversation. Respiratory diseases were #1. Heart disease is not infectious.

      "http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=198559&cid=16 2 73359"

      I'm guessing that you feel that heart disease is the one that's being shortchanged. Heart disease, the #1 killer with one of the highest profile and active charitable organizations (AHA), arguably the most recognized health charity with tremendous government support, is somehow being ripped off by breast cancer awareness and AIDS. Sure it is. Besides the United Way, what charity has a higher profile than the American Heart Association?

      Comparable statistics aren't easy to Google, but a quick look found that the NIH (US National Institute of Health) alone granted $27.3B in fiscal 2003 for heart disease. In contrast, AIDS reseach got $591M (about 41% of the US total) and breast cancer got $693M. The numbers suggest that quite the opposite of your claim is true. To quote from the link you provided:

      "Cardiovascular disease alone will kill five times as many people as HIV/AIDS in these [low and middle income] countries."

      So heart disease will kill 5 times as many people in developing countries as AIDS, 10 times the number of African American males, yet the NIH provides over 46 times the funding. You couldn't be more wrong. What annoys you about people contributing their time and energy to trying to improve the quality of people's lives anyway? Private citizens have to raise money for AIDS because the US government isn't interested.

      You know, there's a lot of scientists in this world and they're capable as a group of studying more than one problem at a time. No matter how much money and effort you throw at heart disease you will always have the problem. AIDS could end up eradicated like polio and small pox while many cancers could become curable as well. All if these diseases deserve attention.

    21. Re:Disease Gap... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Quote me where I said breast cancer had nothing to do with diet.

      You said breast cancer had less of a link to nutrition than heart disease, which is simple wrong. It's a contributing factor in both, and not a major factor for either.

      Ok, so most of the 7 million deaths happen in developing countries, considering that WHO standards that's about 80% of the total world population and considering that other areas show that in the US and Russia alone there is over one million deaths? Don't play a numbers game, you've already lost seeings as where 2 developed nations already make at least 14% of the deaths that they're talking about.

      I find these two run-on sentences utterly incomprehensible, so I can't possibly argue.

      Oh, so now I should go and research every post you've ever done? Get real.

      Instant straw man. Very nice.

      You don't even bother to read my posts that are in THIS thread.

      I specifically said my other posts IN THIS THREAD. It's not exactly asking a lot for people to read OTHER replies before bringing up exactly the same questions repeatedly.

      In any case, you quote sources which say the opposite of what you claim, base your facts on supposition and misquoting disparate sources, won't even both to switch over to my other post where I covered all this in detail, and you've just devolved into wining about the wording of my posts. So with that, I'll let this thread die. Perhaps it will make you feel better to get the last word in...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    22. Re:Disease Gap... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Comparable statistics aren't easy to Google, but a quick look found that the NIH (US National Institute of Health) alone granted $27.3B in fiscal 2003 for heart disease. In contrast, AIDS reseach got $591M (about 41% of the US total) and breast cancer got $693M. The numbers suggest that quite the opposite of your claim is true.

      The NIH is not typical here. The fact is that AIDS and Cancer are recieving many times more funding than CVD (per person affected by the diseases).

      You know, there's a lot of scientists in this world and they're capable as a group of studying more than one problem at a time.

      As well they should. They should not, however, be spending all their time and effort on the diseases that are MARKETED the best, rather than those that have the biggest real impact.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    23. Re:Disease Gap... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      In any case, you quote sources which say the opposite of what you claim, base your facts on supposition and misquoting disparate sources

      Uh, bullshit? I quote, you assume. Get real. Talk about straw men.

      I'm sorry that you have problems with basic math and taking the time to read peoples posts. What else should I expect at this point tho?

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    24. Re:Disease Gap... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "The NIH is not typical here. The fact is that AIDS and Cancer are recieving many times more funding than CVD (per person affected by the diseases)."

      Let's see your statistics in support of this. Not that I believe your claim for one second, but what you're saying is that resent the fact that private donations are biased toward cancer and AIDS reseach. Just what axe are you grinding? Apparently you are more impacted by heart disease than the other two and don't concern yourself with anything else. If only AIDS and cancer enjoyed the attention that heart disease gets.

      "They should not, however, be spending all their time and effort on the diseases that are MARKETED the best, rather than those that have the biggest real impact."

      And who says they are? Who's doing the "marketing"? The American Heart Association is as good at marketing as any and better at fundraising than all of them. Perhaps by your standards we should cut NIH funding there.

      Perhaps you just hate women and gays.

    25. Re:Disease Gap... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      OK, so now you've showed how many are effected by CVD. What you said was:

      "AIDS research already recieves a disproportionally large ammount of money, if you look at the number of people who die from it, and the ammount spent on other serious diseases."

      By "other serious diseases" you must mean CVD. Prove that AIDS is getting a "disproportionally large amount of money" compared to CVD. CVD kills 5 times as many people each year as AIDS. You saying that they get less that 5 times the funding? Preposterous.

  25. Women live longer too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Men die younger, they have Prostate cancer to worry about, higher suicide rates, reckless activities, higher incidence of autism and are more likely to die in wars. After aout 70 years old, women outnumber men by so much it is not funny.

    It is time to start taking care of men!!!

    1. Re:Women live longer too... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Men have a higher incidence of autism because their average personality type is closer to the average autist. They die more in wars because only a few armies even allow females. Prostate cancer hits men at around 70 while breast cancer commonly hits around 40. Reckless activities are again a psychological thing that can't be really affected. I'll start worrying about men when they start making 25% less than women. That number still hasn't gone up.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  26. Also tends to have a higher mortality rate in men. by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    , because it usually isn't detected or diagnosed until it hits an advanced stage.

    http://www.johnwnickfoundation.org/index.html

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  27. One cancer patient says Gag Me With a Pink Ribbon by reifman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Jeanne Sather, a breast cancer survivor, at Assertive Cancer Patient says "Gag me with a pink ribbon: Where pink marketing really runs wild is in the for-profit sector. Retailers offer pink-themed merchandise, then donate only a tiny share of the profits to cancer research. I'm tripping over these products everywhere I go this month. At the pet store, a pink dog collar printed with pink ribbons sells for $9.99; the tag says 30 cents (30 cents!) from the sale of this product will be donated to the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, the 800-pound gorilla of cause marketing." and more.

  28. This is dumb. by prescor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm a guy who three years ago had a lump-ectomy. (Mammograms are NOT fun, y'all. The girls can KEEP 'em!) Fortunately, it was benign.

    That said, "pink sites" is a dumb idea. Or sites of any OTHER color to support a cause. Still, I support freedom of speech and all that. Anyone who wants their site pink because of breast cancer or panther fetishes or whatever, well, more power to 'em.

    I still think it's stupid.

    --
    signat-url: http://www2.potsdam.edu/dctm/prescor/signat-url.ht m
  29. Will slashdot? by erwejo · · Score: 1

    Exactly what the comment says - will slashdot turn pink for a great cause?

    1. Re:Will slashdot? by charlieman · · Score: 1

      It has for a fool cause...

      We want pink slashdot back!

  30. Its NOT just sites - its CITIES! by nighty5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I noticed this last week while walking home from work, passing the Opera House (Sydney) down to the park it was illumiated in completely pink. It looks really cool.

    This effort is global, cities around the world are getting involved in the cause.

    I'm suprised nobody else has seen this, maybe most stay in underground server rooms not to notice?

    http://www.globalillumination.org.au/

    For Australia, "Porches in Pink will begin a day after the Global Illumination on Sunrise, with Australian porches remaining pink for the duration of October to show Australians' support for breast cancer research." ::

    http://www.porchesinpink.org/

    1. Re:Its NOT just sites - its CITIES! by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Ofcourse I didn't notice. I don't usualy pass by the Opera House when I go to work. Unless ofcourse I mistakenly take the plane to Australia instead of the bus again. But that hasn't happend this month so that's why I haven't noticed the pink light.

  31. Just another.. by kbox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ....Temporarily pretend you give a shit about something month/week/day.

  32. How about a smoky color since... by FortranDragon · · Score: 1

    more women die of lung cancer than breast cancer? Isn't the goal to save lives? Most people already know what the pink ribbon means. Let's start reminding them about a worse killer.

    --
    "All the darkness in the world can not quench the light of one small candle."
    1. Re:How about a smoky color since... by bwags · · Score: 1

      And heart disease...

    2. Re:How about a smoky color since... by k_187 · · Score: 1

      no, I'd imagine its about saving teh bewbz. Its a lot easier to get people excited about breast cancer than lung cancer, considering the amount of money that tobacco makes.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
  33. Re:Guys??? by BLKMGK · · Score: 2, Informative

    I never knew guys could get breast cancer until a few years ago when I met someone who not only had it but had hasd a masectome (sp?). One nipple was kind of weird when he had his shirt off and yeah he had some scarring. He got lucky in that it was caught early enough that they were able to get it all.

    Want unfair? Testicular cancer. I'll never forget being told about that in school during the last bit of senior year. They seperated out the boys and girls and then told each group about it. We guys were told that the rate of incidence was as high for men as breast cancer was for women and OBTW we had been susceptible for it for a year or two but the school district wouldn't allow them to teach us about it till we were nearing graduation. One guy actually turned GREEN and passed out. Never seen someone actually turn green but this guy sure did. The doctor will check you for this and mine always seems amazed that I'm actually aware of it as few men apparently are and he was even more amazed the school had actually told us something about it...

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  34. I've pencilled this in for 2056 by crossmr · · Score: 1

    I've been making a spreadsheet to track all the various causes, charities, awarenesses, and other various things I have to observe in my life. Breast Cancer gets its turn then.

  35. Preaching to the choir by bXTr · · Score: 1

    I'm fairly confident that everyone is aware of breast cancer. We certainly get it thrust in our faces enough. They're basically saying that people in general, and women in particular, are essentially stupid and ignorant and have to be reminded all the time of things they need to take care of like regular breast exams. If this is indeed an issue, they should look at the real reasons why people aren't getting regular breast exams (costs, lack of insurance, etc.) instead of just blindly assuming that people are stupid.

    --
    It's a very dark ride.
    1. Re:Preaching to the choir by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1
      I'm fairly confident that everyone is aware of breast cancer. We certainly get it thrust in our faces enough. They're basically saying that people in general, and women in particular, are essentially stupid and ignorant and have to be reminded all the time of things they need to take care of like regular breast exams. If this is indeed an issue, they should look at the real reasons why people aren't getting regular breast exams (costs, lack of insurance, etc.) instead of just blindly assuming that people are stupid.
      Breast exams can be done by yourself, without any tools or any expense, if you know what to look for. The reason women don't do regular breast exams is because they either don't know how or because they don't know it's that important. Telling them seems to be a direct way of passing on that information, don't you think?
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
  36. Ryan O'Reily by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    And by the way, guys can get breast cancer too

    Yup, just like Ryan O'Reily

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  37. I have a solution by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2, Funny

    Early detection wouldn't even be a problem if women weren't so damned sensitive about strangers groping their breasts. Every time I try to diagnose a girl at the local bar I get smacked and treated like a pervert.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:I have a solution by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      I see, so you are not out for self gratification but rather trying to perform a public service for "free" eh?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  38. Re:Guys??? by jc42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, men can not only get breast cancer, but they can also produce milk. Google for "witch's milk" for some descriptions of this in newborns. This happens in around 5% of newborns of both sexes, and normally stops within a week or two. But most of us no longer believe that it's caused by witches. It's now usually attributed to the mother's hormones that cross the placenta and affect the almost-born fetus.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  39. Re:Guys??? by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    I can't believe this. A bunch of serious replies and a mod troll. Say it after me people:

    HUMOUR

  40. No goddamn it by syousef · · Score: 1

    Have all the breast cancer awareness you want. Add prostate cancer to the mix too, raise all the money you like, but I am not fucking changing the colour scheme of my web site to something horrid that makes it unreadable so I can be politically correct.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  41. ModemHelp.Net has gone pink. by DestinyBWL · · Score: 1

    This is a great idea so I've gone pink too.

    --
    Bradford L.
    http://www.modemhelp.net
    1. Re:ModemHelp.Net has gone pink. by schnits0r · · Score: 1

      I'm pink as well...although I know my colours won't change anything, I do like the idea of a change in my site from the normal blue.

  42. Re:So...... by Hahnsoo · · Score: 1

    Well, posting on Slashdot has very little to do with being "manly" in the traditional sense. Quite the opposite, which is probably why we see nonsensical posts of rage through the veil of anonymity. *grin*

  43. Re:Guys??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'm currently undergoing radiation therapy for testicular cancer, and while it's certainly not a barrel of laughs, I can tell you that it responds very well to treatment and has a >90% cure rate. I'm very fortunate because mine was caught early and hadn't spread, so all I needed was basic surgery and a pediatric dose of radiation to be on the safe side. But none of this means anything if you aren't doing self-exams or you don't get treated if you find something. Left untreated, testicular cancer spreads to your brain, and that's no joke.

  44. deja vu by plonk420 · · Score: 1

    wasn't feb or mar or april Breast Cancer Awareness month?

    call me bitter, but i don't support any of those "causes" ... i've already lost my mom to breast cancer in my teens. i do contribute to medical distributed computing (mainly for showing off my ePenis on stats pages) but i guess i'm just too bitter to "contribute" or hang a ribbon around :P

  45. Re:Guys??? by Hahnsoo · · Score: 1

    HUMOUR

    ...is subjective. It's best to remember that around here. Don't worry, the rest of us thought it was funny. Erm, what was the joke again? *grin*

  46. Will google have a logo? by cvd6262 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder what the creative artists at gOOgle could come up with for their logo for October....

    --

    I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    1. Re:Will google have a logo? by Archon-X · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could it be as captivating as: http://www.booble.com/ ?

  47. Re:So...... by remembertomorrow · · Score: 1

    Great post.

    It's all true, but it's very hard to get people "excited" about (or create a trend of support around) something that happens daily or that people REALLY take for granted.

    --
    Registered Linux user #421033
  48. pink my butt by cdn-programmer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I definately want to keep breasts where they belong, it occurs to me this is an opportunity for wee geeks to show how insensitive we can be.

    A common joke in engineering circles is that engineers tend to use their personalities for birth control.

    I expect programmers and web masters have this technique refined somewhat.

    So if we are to support breasts and the idea of keeping them where they belong, then perhaps it behooves the primary beneficiaries to share the benefits with wee geeks rather than the jocks (jokes anyone?) in the crowd which urban lore would suggest are questionably more desireable?

    1. Re:pink my butt by sharkey · · Score: 1

      this is an opportunity for wee geeks to show how insensitive we can be.

      What about us big, fat geeks? This IS Slashdot after all, how many wee geeks do you think are here?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  49. Going Pink by chrpai · · Score: 1

    Laugh all you want, but my Hard Core Setup Engineering blog has proudly gone pink today. After giving me two wonderful daughters, by wife has been diagnosed with stage 3 cancer. Cancer is serious stuff my friends. I hope you never have to find out personally.

  50. What's the bloody point? by Asrynachs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thanks for the awareness? How come there's no breast cancer prevention month? Wouldn't an attempt to educate people on how to spot the disease early on and get it properly treated be a better use of resources than some stupid pink theme? It's always walk for a cure, or some other crap like that. They NEVER talk about preventing breast cancer. They use mammograms for that. But with the way things are now you'd think you could stop breast cancer with a big smile and a long walk.

    1. Re:What's the bloody point? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      The point is comarketing. October is typically a dead sales month (after back-to-school, before Christmas), so you drop "Breast Cancer Awareness" in there and go. "Cancer Research" is already one of the worst ways to spend your charitable dollar. First check the "admin costs/research" percentages. Then look up how well (like % drop) "cancer research" has done to drop cancer rates. (Hint: You'll see we spent a lot of money and got very little improvement.) Then ask your local rep if they're for stem cell research (often not) and proven environmental measures to prevent cancer (expect blank stare). Then look at the products that are cobranded pink: top-end mixers, washing machines, etc. It's a fricking scam and women eat it up.

  51. Re:One cancer patient says Gag Me With a Pink Ribb by noidentity · · Score: 1

    Yuck. But if the point of this is raising awareness "What's that pink ribbon for? Breast cancer awareness, hmmm, what is that about?" etc. then it's doing its job. If it's a campaign for awareness, the goal isn't money, it's getting the word out. I guess they could do more, like put big signs hanging from the dog collar (as an example), though I doubt that would be very practical.

  52. Why? by mh101 · · Score: 1

    So, nobody would know about breast cancer, except for the fact that web sites change to a pink color scheme for a month? Uh, yeah, sure.

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  53. No match for "CHECKOUTMYVAGINA.COM". by ModernGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll give it 5 minutes.

    No match for "CHECKOUTMYVAGINA.COM". >>> Last update of whois database: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 23:22:25 EDT

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:No match for "CHECKOUTMYVAGINA.COM". by b0r1s · · Score: 1


      # date && whois CHECKOUTMYVAGINA.COM | grep -i checkout
      Sun Oct 1 22:32:40 PDT 2006
      No match for domain "CHECKOUTMYVAGINA.COM".

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    2. Re:No match for "CHECKOUTMYVAGINA.COM". by ronanbear · · Score: 1

      It'll probably be registered by the end of the day

      --
      the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
    3. Re:No match for "CHECKOUTMYVAGINA.COM". by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

      ROFL, too funny :-p

         Domain Name: CHECKOUTMYVAGINA.COM
         Registrar: GO DADDY SOFTWARE, INC.
         Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com
         Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com
         Name Server: PARK30.SECURESERVER.NET
         Name Server: PARK29.SECURESERVER.NET
         Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK
         EPP Status: clientDeleteProhibited
         EPP Status: clientUpdateProhibited
         EPP Status: clientTransferProhibited
         EPP Status: clientRenewProhibited
         Updated Date: 02-Oct-2006
         Creation Date: 02-Oct-2006
         Expiration Date: 02-Oct-2007

      >>> Last update of whois database: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:28:53 EDT <<<

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:No match for "CHECKOUTMYVAGINA.COM". by russotto · · Score: 1
      It'll probably be registered by the end of the day
      With a picture of something emphatically NOT a vagina.
    5. Re:No match for "CHECKOUTMYVAGINA.COM". by waif69 · · Score: 1

      It is registered as of 16:13 Zulu.

  54. As a high-risk woman... by acherusia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Warning: I'm not entirely emotionally rational on this subject. Please read the rest of my post with this in mind.

    Look. I am a woman at extremely high risk for breast cancer. My mother had breast cancer. My father had cancer. Going back further, the family history I have of cancer borders on the ridiculous. Furthermore, I have extremely large breasts, which is another risk factor. (The more tissue, the more room there is for tumors to grow. Also, larger breasts make cancer harder to detect just by feeling it, which is your best chance of catching it early.)

    At some point within the next five years, I'm probably going to have to undergo breast reduction surgery. I'm still young enough that it hasn't become medically necessary yet, but my doctor's been suggesting it since I was 16. I'm terrified of this. I hate surgery. I hate the risk that I'll lose all feeling in my breasts. I hate the fact that I probably won't even have the option to breast-feed. I hate the fact that no matter what, I'm going to end up with scars on my breasts.

    But you know what? At some point, assuming they don't come up with a sure-fire cure for breast cancer, I'll go through with it. Because I'd rather have scarred, numb, tiny breasts than risk dying.

    As such, as you might imagine, I am EXTREMELY supportive of breast cancer research. I try to do whatever I can to get those extra dollars in that might allow me to avoid having surgery. I try to attend those goddamn money-raising breast cancer things, despite the fact that I hate hate hate crowds. If I were any good at dealing with people, I'd organize one. Or several. I do do as much as I can within my areas of expertise to raise awareness. Because. Well. I watched my mother go through chemotherapy. I watched my father go through chemotherapy. I heard about my aunt, and my cousins, going through chemotherapy. And every last dollar that goes to breast cancer research is one more chance I have of not dying.

    You want prostate cancer awareness to reach the level of breast cancer awareness? Then advertise it yourself. I'm busy.

  55. How about a National CANCER Awareness month by SetupWeasel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This shit must infuriate people with Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma.

  56. Re:So...... by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1
    There must be something wrong with me. It must be that I don't have a woman.
    Indeed, it's clear that you don't.

    ...all those damn feminists...
    Your anger shines through in your original post and here as well. It serves only to undermine your credibility. Seek help; you have mother issues.

    This isnt about me
    Yes, it is. Your original post was all about you and your disposition.

    Breast cancer is an issue because it's good PR
    No, breast cancer is an issue because it's an issue, simple as that. Contrary to your fabricated little world, things do co-exist. Breast cancer isn't the only issue, but it is an issue, and deserves attention... more so than the Windows vs. Linux vs. Mac debates you post so feverisly about.

    but why would I risk my good name if people like you are simply going to fling insults around posing them as arguments?
    If YOUR position had any merit whatsoever, you wouldn't give a damn about what someone on slashdot thought of you or your opinion - fucked as it is. I question the validity of your claim that you have any "good name" whatsoever.
    --
    Beware of the Leopard.
  57. Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I love slashdot. The answer to "both my sisters were just diagnosed with breast cancer; what can I do?" is "#ff99cc".

  58. Your journal... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Since your journal entry about this appears to be closed for comments, I'll reply here.

    Any woman insulted by the OMG Ponies gag is either not very intelligent, or has not seen MySpace. We are not laughing at women in general, we are laughing at stupid teenage girls. Just to make sure you don't miss this, I am referring to those teenage girls who are stupid, not implying that all teenage girls are stupid.

    Note also that I do not speak for all Slashdotters, but I suspect many will back me up that the majority of the posts on April 1st were not anti-female in general, but as I said above, anti-stupid-MySpace-teen-girl.

    Really, when we make fun of l33tsp33k and Counter-Strike players, when we make fun of Duke Nukem and Bruce Campbell steriotypes, or when we make fun of jocks, we are not making fun of men in general, but a particular breed of stupid men.

    If the OMG Ponies really offends you that deeply, I suspect that it's got less to do with it making fun of women, and more to do with it making fun of something you like. Maybe it's the hearts, or the pink, maybe you like ponies but hate OMG, something like that. But IANAT (I Am Not A Therapist), so I don't really know. I do know it doesn't offend all intelligent women -- my mother thought it was absolutely hilarious.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  59. Re:So...... by Reene · · Score: 1

    I'm a woman. I've also got a grandmother, a great grandmother and several other women in my family that have had tumors (both benign and malignant) in their breasts.

    I also agree with the grandparent. This breast cancer awareness bullshit is just that; bullshit. It's pretty much been reduced to the level of a cheap marketing gimmick and a way to boost PR within and without certain businesses. It's disgusting.

    That said, it's your body; whether you're male or female, it's your job and your responsibility to take care of it. If you honestly need reminders like these to use common sense and get annual checkups for whichever diseases you are at risk for, then you probably deserve whatever you get.

    --
    "He does look a bit Oompa like, even if his Loompa is a bit off-kilter."
  60. No, Dr. Phil, you missed it by a mile. by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    I dislike it because women read that shit and then retaliate with the kind of 24/7 male bashing you see day in and day out on TV, newspapers, and in the movies.

    It's all about do unto others as you'd have others do unto you and all that.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:No, Dr. Phil, you missed it by a mile. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Every girl I saw on Slashdot seemed to like the joke. That stuff on TV, newspapers and the movies is a response to millenia of persecution and not one silly Slashdot joke.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  61. Half right by el+americano · · Score: 1

    More people get prostate cancer, but more die of breast cancer.

    We could still use a PR campaign though - even if older men don't look good on posters.

    --
    Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
  62. Golden rule? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    I would have us not be afraid to have a sense of humor, and yes, I'd have them bash male steriotypes. I'd have to be an utter moron to identify with one closely enough and say "Hey, that's me you're insulting!" It's like the Taco Bell Chihuahua...

    Let's just say you need to watch a little more Carlos Mencia, and laugh, and understand.

    Perhaps you could give me an example of this retaliation of which you speak? And maybe explain how any of it is directly a result of OMG Ponies?

    Also, the headline in your journal calls it "utter mysogynism." This is obviously not true, as I said, to any intelligent woman.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  63. I give... by Ice+Wewe · · Score: 1
    This story is...

    Score: 5, Informative

    Now I have to go check my boobs...

  64. Re:Men don't "organize". by Neil+Hodges · · Score: 1

    Something worth noting is that women have always been more social. Has anyone heard the metaphor that men hide in caves with problems whilst women socialize over their problems? Also, the stereotypical image of a "gossip" is almost always female.

    Men just prefer to deal with their problems alone, while women will team up and fight them with synergy.

  65. Re: Prostate Cancer by gringer · · Score: 1

    Just to start this off (if anyone wishes to continue the debate), prostate cancer (PC) is a somewhat more tricky thing to deal with at the moment. Tests (I'm thinking mainly about PSA here, which is fairly common for detecting PC) have quite a high false positive rate, and they're not all that sensitive. In many cases, by the time PC is detected, the only realistic options may end up being removal of the prostate or radiation treatment, which can result in a reduction of the quality of life of a person (those "leaky hose" analogies come to mind). In addition, PC tends to be more prevalent in older generations, and death by PC may not end up being that much earlier than death by other causes -- yes, it's not very nice to live with, but there's not really a magic bullet to make all people feel better after treatment. With the increase in life expectancy, and development of better treatments, this may change and allow a more positive PR campaign to be carried out.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  66. Re:Prostate Cancer colour by gringer · · Score: 1

    Creamy yellow (think about what this cancer affects first...)

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  67. Poor Awareness. by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 1

    "And by the way, guys can get breast cancer too."

    Perhaps we should make our sites pink and blue since this is not common knowledge in order to increase "awareness".

  68. ObBloomCounty by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Are they showing more cross-sections of the President's prostate again? Ya know, fer my money, you can never have enough of that sort of thing.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  69. Google breast-cancer awareness logo by phorm · · Score: 1

    Perhaps something like:

    G(.)(.)gle

    (all in pink, of course)

  70. I'll take you up on that by Travoltus · · Score: 1
    Also, the headline in your journal calls it "utter mysogynism." This is obviously not true, as I said, to any intelligent woman.

    Ok. I call your bluff. Show us one woman - any woman - who agrees with you.

    I'll even hold my breath.
    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:I'll take you up on that by Mrs.+jdavidb · · Score: 1

      I'm a woman. I thought it was hilarious.

      --
      David's Bride
    2. Re:I'll take you up on that by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      My mother, as I said earlier in the thread. Shouldn't be too hard to find, just look at the last sentence of the post.

      You can breathe now.

      Also, thanks, Mrs. jdavidb, nice to hear a voice of sanity! Funny, my name is David...

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    3. Re:I'll take you up on that by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      Well done, you found one, and I'm sure your mom is around somewhere to confirm this, or so you claim.

      I bet I can match that by finding a few Jews to laugh at "how did the Grand Canyon...?" jokes, some blacks who laugh at "a black and a mexican are riding in a car, who's the driver?" joke, etc. The word I'm looking for is 'uncle tom'.

      Not to take away from your feat of declaring your mommy is one such woman, under my challenge, or mrs jdavid. Well done.

      So now we've established that we're making fun of myspace women on slashdot. Good thing. Somehow I suspect you'll manage to find a way to explain how Myspace women became a relevant topic here..........

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    4. Re:I'll take you up on that by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1
      I bet I can match that by finding a few Jews to laugh at "how did the Grand Canyon...?" jokes, some blacks who laugh at "a black and a mexican are riding in a car, who's the driver?" joke, etc.

      So what was the point of bringing it up in the first place?

      So now we've established that we're making fun of myspace women on slashdot. Good thing. Somehow I suspect you'll manage to find a way to explain how Myspace women became a relevant topic here...

      Why does it have to be relevant? In any case, MySpace is relevant, and OMG Ponies, women or not, is inherent to the culture of MySpace. Also, there used to be a whole section of Slashdot dedicated to humor -- and even if there wasn't, it seems fair game on April 1st.

      But it seems you don't have a sense of humor. Sorry about that.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    5. Re:I'll take you up on that by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      That's true. I need to learn to laugh at jokes about women to have a sense of humor, yessiree. We all know that's the only way to get a laugh nowadays. You have your mother and your women jokes, all I have is a nice job, a baby and a wife. Poor me. Boo hoo hoo.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  71. Re: Prostate Cancer by Bluebuilder · · Score: 1

    I would also like to point out the hudge difference in results from treatment between breast and prostate cancer. A woman having a breast removed is mostly a cosmetic loss, and can be managed with an implant, while a man having his prostate removed will have difficulties with sex, and urination (controlling it) among other things.

  72. even better by humankind · · Score: 1

    Where's National Breast Awareness Month? Why limit it to just cancer? Sounds like discrimination to me.

  73. porn? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    I imagine it helps to run and operate a porn site. You're probably close to half way there already.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  74. Give me Pink Ponies or give me Death! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Hmm. Well, I'm all for the pink month, especially since it is very true that men can - and are - getting breast cancer.

    But I must admit I'm far more concerned about women getting breast cancer, and think my feelings on the subject are those spoken in The Princess Bride: "There's a shortage of perfect breasts in this world."

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  75. That's just wrong (the tag(s)) by Kris_B_04 · · Score: 1

    Why in the world is this tagged under "boobies"?

    Come ON /.
    That's just WRONG!

    --
    Remember when Windows were washed, mice were trapped and UNIX guarded the harem?
  76. Re:February is National Black History Month! by aqk · · Score: 1

    That should be 'RACIST SHITHEADS' but I digress...

  77. Odd... by Geminii · · Score: 1

    I thought most of the internet consisted of pink, breast-aware sites already?

  78. Re:ha ha by X-treme-LLama · · Score: 1

    Gah! Sorry about that (now that I'm days too late) always keep drunk people off your computers.