Slashdot Mirror


Libya Purchases 1.2 mil Wind-up Laptops

An anonymous reader writes "The government of Libya is reported to have agreed to provide its 1.2m school children with a cheap, durable laptop computer by June 2008. The laptops offer internet access and are powered by a wind-up crank. They cost $100 and manufacturing begins next year, says One Laptop per Child. The non-profit association's chairman, Nicholas Negroponte, said the deal was reached on Tuesday in Libya. Professor Negroponte told the New York Times in an email that the project mirrored Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi's political agenda of creating a more open Libya and he also expressed interest in purchasing the computers for poorer African neighbors."

258 comments

  1. Ummm by 2.7182 · · Score: 4, Funny

    BTW, were these things designed to be sand proof ?

    1. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am not sure if you are joking, but this is a serious problem in desert communities. Were not talking about just being out on a windy day. I was in Desert Storm and ALL of our equipment suffered sand problems.

    2. Re:Ummm by hadhad69 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't worry, I hear they have buildings in Libya now. Even a car that the whole town an use!

      --
      If you can read this, it's already too late.
    3. Re:Ummm by Plutonite · · Score: 5, Informative

      You were more likely than not right in the desert, which is a lot worse than being in the city and operating out of air conditioned buildings. I used to live in kuwait and had less problems with sand&dust than many other places. If you can use the equipment in a closed area then you should be fine.

    4. Re:Ummm by pfoorion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was a Peace Corps volunteer in Niger (Libya's neighbor to the south). Niger is very poor and the vast majority (99%+) of kids live in mud huts and sand gets EVERYWHERE. If Libya is indeed considering buying these for Nigerien kids, sand-proofing the machines would be key. Electronics in general do not last long at all in the harsh environment there.

    5. Re:Ummm by einolu · · Score: 1

      forget sandproof, does it play counterstrike?

    6. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, yes they are designed to be sandproof. Spend some time looking around the OLPC wiki at http://wiki.laptop.org/ and you will see that they have put a lot of effort into making these units unbreakable and long-lived. This is not just some cheap toy, it is an innovative laptop which has features that you can find nowhere else in commercial models.

      Unfortunately, this probably means there will soon be a black market in stolen OLPCs because they are easily worth $300 to $500 to people who want their unique features.

    7. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are designed to be moisture and sand proof. The keyboard is made out of one piece of rubber and there are only a few open ports which can be covered. All seams are rubberized.

    8. Re:Ummm by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      So is the bright green laptop cases for when they lose it in the sand it's easier to find? It's a sweet green.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    9. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sand proof? Too bad the idea isn't scam proof. This is going to go down as one of the "best... scams... evar". I believe they got people to pony up around half a billion dollars for this, and the idea hasn't even been proven. I'm guessing these nice new $100 laptops will either sit in boxes for years as people figure out what to do with them, or else they will quickly make their way to the black market where some tribal warlord can throw them in as bonuses for buying a stinger missile system (courtesy of Ronny Raygun).

    10. Re:Ummm by jg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, as best we can. The keyboard is a rubber membrane keyboard (but much nicer than any you may have seen.

      When closed, we intend it to be rained on or survive a dust storm.

    11. Re:Ummm by jabelar · · Score: 1

      What about kid-proof! These are for children, and I'd want to see it withstanding a child jumping on it and spilling juice on it before I'd declare it ready for use.

    12. Re:Ummm by EotB · · Score: 2, Funny

      So the One Laptop Per Child program has to be proceeded by One Air-Conditioned Room Per Child then??

    13. Re:Ummm by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Terrorists Win

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    14. Re:Ummm by fithmo · · Score: 1
      You were more likely than not right in the desert...

      Not only that, but he said he was in a desrt storm! I'm sure sand was blowing everywhere!

    15. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehehe

    16. Re:Ummm by hadhad69 · · Score: 0

      I am not a troll!

      --
      If you can read this, it's already too late.
    17. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you imagine a computer grid of 1.2 mil laptops (cxostin $100 each) programmed to attack the U.S. of A.? Instead of sending laptops, make a hole in the world map...

    18. Re:Ummm by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      No.. they can fit more than one child in a room in most countries.

    19. Re:Ummm by Kopretinka · · Score: 1
      You were more likely than not right in the desert, which is a lot worse than being in the city and operating out of air conditioned buildings

      We are talking about all Libyan school-age children - most of them won't have air-conditioned buildings available.

      --
      Yesterday was the time to do it right. Are we having a REVOLUTION yet?
  2. Terrorists! by crhylove · · Score: 5, Funny

    God damn that Muammar Gaddafi, trying to make those African kids better with computers than our American kids. We need to get rid of these kinds of terrorists immediately, with their educating children and what not. What's next a Libyan bill of rights?!?!? Somebody needs to tell them that this is 2006, and the whole concept of a "Bill of Rights" is totally dated.

    rhY

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    1. Re:Terrorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like, "Goddurn towel-headded terrist goin' make himself a wind-up cluster to simulate them thur atom bombs!"

      More likely, he is trying to give the kids a better start in life.

    2. Re:Terrorists! by minus_273 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know this is a joke, but Lybia essentially changed sides in 2003.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    3. Re:Terrorists! by pubjames · · Score: 2, Interesting

      God damn that Muammar Gaddafi

      Personally I find it interesting that, in the build up to the current war in Iraq, the US administration tried to make out that Saddam Hussien had proven links to the funding of terrorist activities in the west - which now turns out not to be true - whereas Gaddafi is known to have directly funded and supported international terrorist operations for many years, and yet now he is our best mate. I wonder why that is..?

    4. Re:Terrorists! by suntac · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      To make sure that those kids will not become cyber terrorists and start learning all the good stuff from the beginning the US government has made sure that all those laptops will be shipped with Windows as the standard OS.

      And thanks to some DRM chips you can only run Windows on them ;-) Well I jus made this up for fun but in fact it could very well be that it is running windows. Anyone knows what those machines are running?

      --
      Regards, Johan Louwers.
    5. Re:Terrorists! by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The recent history of Lybia is an example of how protracted negotiation with 'terrorist' regimes can result in a positive outcome. For many, many years Muammar Gaddafi was seen as the ultimate bad guy, worse even than Saddam Hussain. Now he's, if not exactly one of the good guys, not part of the axis of evil.

      If Iraq is a classic example of 'how not to do regime change' then Lybia is a classic example of 'how to do it right'.

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    6. Re:Terrorists! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I wonder why that is..?

      Haliburton is now the official state-sanctioned construction company of Libya.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:Terrorists! by Megane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "negotiation"? I don't recall us doing much negotiation with them. As far as I can tell, it was 1) we kicked their ass back in the day, 2) put them in esentially a permanent penalty box, and 3) they saw what happened in Iraq and decided they didn't really want to go through that. That's what really changed their mind.

      And it certainly wasn't accomplished though appeasement.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    8. Re:Terrorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One of the mistakes of the West is to consider Mohammad as a prophet for Arabs and Muslims only. Europe and America face difficult times ... as time passes they can either accept that they will become Muslim, or they must proclaim war on Muslims."

      Ghadaffi, April 2005.

    9. Re:Terrorists! by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Give it a few years and we'll be bombing them as 'terrorists' just like we did iraq. We seem to decide our friends and enemies at the toss of a coin these days.

    10. Re:Terrorists! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      How simple! Twenty years where nothing happened - not even in 2001.

    11. Re:Terrorists! by rlp · · Score: 1

      If Iraq is a classic example of 'how not to do regime change' then Lybia is a classic example of 'how to do it right'. Gaddaffi had a change of heart when he saw news videos of the capture of Saddam and figured he could be next. He spoke to Italy's (former) PM Berlusconi and said: "I will do whatever the Americans want, because I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid". He also came clean on his WMD program, and turned over equipment indicating that Libya was a lot farther along in a nuclear program than anyone thought. There are some reports that his designated political heir - his son, is pro-democracy. I'd take this with a large grain of salt.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    12. Re:Terrorists! by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The important point is that the US didn't kick their ass back in the day. It could be reasonably argued the the US had far more reasons for invading Lybia than it ever had for invading Iraq (forgetting cynical explanations involving oil) but instead they held back. It is precisely this kick their ass and that will sort it out A-Team attitude that has led the US into the mess that is Iraq. I hear that the US is now destined to be there until 2010 at least.

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    13. Re:Terrorists! by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      Weapons of mass destruction to weapons of mass instruction, eh?

    14. Re:Terrorists! by david_g17 · · Score: 1

      If Iraq is a classic example of 'how not to do regime change' then Lybia is a classic example of 'how to do it right'.

      IIRC, and I bet I do, the timing of Lybia becoming a non-bad-guy coincided precisely with our attack on Iraq. We said Iraq had WMD's and invaded. I believe it was within a few weeks that Lybia gave up their WMD program and tried to become good guys. coincidence?

    15. Re:Terrorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The important point is that the US didn't kick their ass back in the day. It could be reasonably argued the the US had far more reasons for invading Lybia than it ever had for invading Iraq (forgetting cynical explanations involving oil) but instead they held back. It is precisely this kick their ass and that will sort it out A-Team attitude that has led the US into the mess that is Iraq. I hear that the US is now destined to be there until 2010 at least.


      You know, I've been against the Iraq debacle the whole time, but your previous post about "protracted negotiations" is horeshit. A point of view like yours is what allowed North Korea to develop nuclear technology while we were providing aid. Clinton (and I like Clinton) thought he had appeased his way out of the situation, but the development timeline suggests that they were taking aid in one hand and cranking up nuke technology with the other. Your naivete is astounding. Gaddafi simply didn't want his ass kicked ala Iraq '91 (i.e. in and out, fuck rebuilding and nation building).

    16. Re:Terrorists! by Dan+Hayes · · Score: 1

      Well no, because it was the UK that did all the negotiating, not the US. The main purpose of the US was simply to be trigger-happy and menacing, something it does far better than delicate negotiations.

    17. Re:Terrorists! by deKernel · · Score: 0
      If Iraq is a classic example of 'how not to do regime change' then Lybia is a classic example of 'how to do it right'.


      And now you need to ask yourself why? The reason why his views have changed is because we _DID_ go into Iraq. He is now aware that we (Americans and not UN) are quite serious and should be taken seriously.
    18. Re:Terrorists! by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      i think his son plays in the german soccer league (bundesliga). He certainly doesnt seem like a homicidial maniac.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    19. Re:Terrorists! by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      sounds like some one has never heard of good cop bad cop

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    20. Re:Terrorists! by EQ · · Score: 1

      "... which now turns out not to be true "

      Really? Care to back that assertion up?

      Saddam Hussein's links to terrorism have been proven by documents showing he helped to fund the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.

      The PFLP, whose history of terrorism dates back to the "black September" hijackings of 1970, was personally vetted by Saddam to receive oil vouchers worth £40 million.

      The deal has been uncovered by US investigators, trawling millions of pages of documents showing a network of diplomats bribed by Saddam's regimes, and political parties who qualified for backhanded payments from Baghdad.

      His financial support also extended to Abu Al-Abbas, leader of the Palestinian Liberation Front - another terrorist group - who was allocated 11.5 million barrels of oil.

      The PLO is also named as a main beneficiary from Saddam's scheme - receiving four million barrels under its own name and five million barrels for its "political bureau". The cash was again passed through Syria, a known conduit for Palestinian terror organisations.

      OH, you said WESTERN terrorism (define that? Israel is to the WEST fo Iraq last time I saw a map). I suppose - in your view its Ok that he backed terrorism in the middle east since it sounds like there is nothing wrong with letting Arabs and Jews die to terrorists.

      And thats just the start of it - the terror training camps at Slma Pak, etc - its all out there in the government and press reports from documents captured in Iraq. So you might want to be a bit more careful with flippant off-hand bashing that isnt supported by facts.

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo! http://goo.gl/J9bkO
    21. Re:Terrorists! by whyloginwhysubscribe · · Score: 1

      As far as I remember, Margeret Thatcher allowed the planes which bombed libya to take off from the UK, so we had our own part to play in the menacing of Libya. Operation El Dorado Canyon

    22. Re:Terrorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, we knew about the uranium enrichment they were doing. It wasn't a surprise to us, but then again, that was back before Bush fired all of the intelligence staff that told the truth instead of telling him what he wanted to hear. So Bush comes along, cancels the agreement Clinton had made, and Kim goes in, throws out the inspectors, and busts out his plutonium refinement gear, and here 4 years later he's got a plutonium bomb (a shitty one, but he has it nonetheless).

      Nobody reasonable had expected Clinton's agreement to do anything but buy time and favor.

      Incidentially, "behave or we'll kick your ass" is also a form of diplomacy when you can back it up, and the other guy knows it, as in Libya.

    23. Re:Terrorists! by orielbean · · Score: 1

      No, we were in negotations with them and the British for several years - we explained to the Colonel that if he brings policy change to the table and acts on good faith, we would completely abandon the regime change - remember that we dropped bombs on him personally and killed some family members, so it wasn't the toothless gibbering that we perform w/ Jong Il and the Ayatollah. The negotations were not big and public, and so most people never heard anything about them until he switched sides and gave up the expensive WMD pogrom.

    24. Re:Terrorists! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1
      Gaddafi is still a bastard even if he's an ally of sorts in the war against al Qaeda.

      I read that the biological weapons programs he gave up were laughable anyway, e.g.

      http://observer.guardian.co.uk/worldview/story/0,, 1111343,00.html

      Libya's biological weapons programme too has suffered from similar mismanagement and lack of funds, say sources; at best succeeding in producing munitions boobytrapped with human faeces that can be fatal if it enters the blood stream.
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    25. Re:Terrorists! by PresN · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't watch a lot of soccer.

    26. Re:Terrorists! by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't watch a lot of soccer.

      yeah, usually i stick to football.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    27. Re:Terrorists! by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      The way the story probably went is that the U.S. was in desperate need of some victory, and Libya saw a chance to try again to normalize relations.
      The U.S accepted, on one condition of course, that Lybia take all the blame.

    28. Re:Terrorists! by stuartrobinson · · Score: 1

      What then would North Korea be?

    29. Re:Terrorists! by f1055man · · Score: 1

      Umm, not really, sort of, not even close. You don't recall "us" doing much negotiation with them, because it wasn't the United States, it was the EU. After a decade of talks, Libya copped to the bombing of Pan Am 103 and reached a settlement with the victim's families. Gaddafi wanted to do business with the E.U., and the E.U. wanted the $3 billion dollar settlement. Gaddafi had offered to dismantle their weapons program for 4 years before the details were worked out and an agreement was made in 2003. You see, not everything in international relations fits into the attention span of our gold fish in chief.
      Gaddafi's reputation in the States is quite different from how he is seen elsewhere in the world. While a dictator, he is also seen as a rational statesmen. The Gaddafi family are rather westernized. His children include a pro soccer player, a painter, and his only daughter is a lawyer(Saddam's but a lawyer nonetheless). Gaddafi took power at 27, so he's only 64. Libya has to deal with him quite a bit longer, but it should become a more open society over time.
      So to sum it up, "As far as I can tell" was the most illuminating portion of your comment.

    30. Re:Terrorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >If Iraq is a classic example of 'how not to do regime change' then Lybia is a classic example of 'how to do it right'.
      knock down some other regime in the region some that they know you mean it?

    31. Re:Terrorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In light of recent events at the time, he may have considered that remaining a 'rouge state' dramatically increased the probability of invasion.

    32. Re:Terrorists! by NumerusSpy · · Score: 0

      And I still dont believe they did 103 by themselves if at all. They only copped to it because if they didn't the countries future was fscked.

      --
      There they are a conga line of suck holes. On the conservative side of Australian politics. - Mark Latham
    33. Re:Terrorists! by NumerusSpy · · Score: 0

      I hope I find people just like you when I float the Sydney Opera House

      --
      There they are a conga line of suck holes. On the conservative side of Australian politics. - Mark Latham
  3. Why? by acvh · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Look, I think personal computers have proven to be a revolutionary addition to modern life, but poor and hungry kids in third world countries don't LIVE a modern life. They would be much better served by modern medicine, education, and help in removing the dictators who rape their own countries and KEEP those poor kids poor.

    1. Re:Why? by 2.246.1010.78 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First of all every people should get rid of of their own dictator. But educated masses are the first step for creating democracies and raise the awareness of political and social problems. Maybe it will help.

    2. Re:Why? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah guess what, charity doesn't work in Africa, it just keeps up a dependency relationship.

      Education works. Laptops are a nice way of showing some effort on that front.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      will you people ever stop with the "dictators are bad, democrayies are for the free". If you even have a government ruling you, you aint free, so stop pretending you are. You could have a bad life if live under a democratic government, or under a dictaror, the type of government is not what makes them good or bad, its the people that run it.

      You need to learn, that there are good dictators out there, and at least they get things done.

    4. Re:Why? by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A personal computer can be a great way to improve education! You don't think they're going to be playing video games or cranking out word documents with that (printerless) thing, do you? Libya is not some super-poor country, either. They have an 82.6% literacy rate so we know they're getting some education. CIA rates their average risk of getting Major infectious diseases as "intermediate" so they do have some competent level of medical care. Considering all that and their 2.3% rate of population growth, I'd say Libya is a second world, or developing, nation. Not a third world.

      And if their Jamahiriya government style wanted to 'rape their own country and KEEP those poor kids poor" why would they be buying the laptops or trying to create a more open Libya?

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    5. Re:Why? by hclyff · · Score: 1
      who rape their own countries and KEEP those poor kids poor
      They do? By buying 120 mil USD worth of computers? Yeah, total rape.
    6. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where do you people come from? It's like, no matter how much light is shed on this matter, people keep objecting with that irrelavent point. These computers are for countries that are poor, yes, but they already have modern medicine, education and democracy. Yes, such countries exist, like the ones already planning on buying these computers: Nigeria, Brazil, Argentina, Thailand, and now Libya. The countries like the ones you describe aren't the ones getting these. They have bigger problems to deal with, as you say.

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up. Do yourself a massive favour and go back and read every other slashdot article on the OLPC project. The same tired, cliched comment that you just made always comes up. And it has been shot down again and again. And again.

      For the record: not every child in Africa is starving and sick. Many, many of them are fed and healthy, and hungry for leading and opportunites. They will benefit imensely from this. The targeted countries are not famine or war zones. This project's sponsors have in fact thougt about it for longer than the 30 seconds that you have, and they still think it's a good idea.

    8. Re:Why? by symes · · Score: 1

      Of course food, shelter and education should be prioritised and in Libya there's already a fair bit going on http://www.undp-libya.org/index.php?option=com_con tent&task=view&id=33&Itemid=42. So long as providing windup laptops does not prevent poverty reduction surely they are a good thing?

    9. Re:Why? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are right! these kids will be educated that they can get more than $100US for their laptops on ebay from hungry geeks dying to have one of these things.

      The maker is being completely idiotic not selling them to geeks. I'd pay $200.00 for one right now for tinkering. Hell as a backpacking/camping PC it's down right perfect!

      So the third world will get their money via paypal and ebay, and geeks get them in spite of the sillyness of the company/foundation making them.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:Why? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So the third world will get their money via paypal and ebay
      I can't decide if you're serious or not, but just in case you are, but the country I live in (Hungary) joined the EU in 2004. Do you know since when can we use Paypal here to receive money? Oh, since Oct 5th, 2006...

      Somehow I highly doubt that those kids in the poor countries could engage in any financial relationship with anyone abroad.
      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    11. Re:Why? by Drall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Libya life expectancy: 76.69 years
      USA life expectancy: 77.85 years

      Yup, they're just about starving, there. I can see the corpses piling up daily...

    12. Re:Why? by rvw · · Score: 1

      Not all Libyan children are poor and hungry. I don't know but I won't be surprised if most of them go to school and have a regular family life. These laptops won't reach the children who live on the streets, but if they reach the children in school, that will help those children get a better life, improve their standard of living, and in the long run that will improve the life of the hungry and poor as well.

      It's the same as in any society. Not the poor started to use computers and internet in the US and Europe, but the rich(er) and educated. Then it passed on to the rest.

    13. Re:Why? by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The best and worst forms of government are forms of dictatorship, be they by monarch, militia, or single-party constitutions.
      Democracy is the most mediocre system, ruling by the law of averages.

    14. Re:Why? by ag0ny · · Score: 1

      The maker is being completely idiotic not selling them to geeks.

      The maker just sold 1.2 million of these. I wouldn't call that "being completely idiotic".

    15. Re:Why? by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I expect someone will be offering them $20 for the laptop (or stealing tons of them) then plopping them on ebay. The kids don't have to be the ones to sell in order to profit.

      FYI, there are 384.2 laptops in a ton.

    16. Re:Why? by woohoodonuts · · Score: 1

      I'd pay $200.00 for one right now for tinkering. Hell as a backpacking/camping PC it's down right perfect!

      Perfect for what? Kindling? Sure, GPS maybe, but even then there's better / simpler / easier to carry solutions. This post is just screaming for a nature / technology soviet russia joke.

    17. Re:Why? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 3, Insightful
      CIA rates their average risk of getting Major infectious diseases as "intermediate" so they do have some competent level of medical care.

      Read here:
      http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v443/n7109/fu ll/443254b.html

      Lawyers defending six medical workers who risk execution by firing squad in Libya have called for the international scientific community to support a bid to prove the medics' innocence. The six are charged with deliberately infecting more than 400 children with HIV at the al-Fateh Hospital in Benghazi in 1998, so far causing the deaths of at least 40 of them.

      The six are all foreign workers. Poor conditions at the hospital led to 400 kids getting AIDS, and now the Libyan "government" is trying these six in a death-penalty case to try to blame them for the poor conditions at the hospital.

      Libya is a 3rd-world hell-hole, but it doesn't have to be. There's plenty of money, they just need to can the idiot running the place and get an actual government. Probably the best piece that I've read on Libya:

      http://www.laweekly.com/general/features/in-the- land-of-the-brother-leader/12/

      In Michael Totten's words: Libya is the most oppressive state on earth next to North Korea.

      I would strongly suggest that anyone in Libya who may be reading this to read the "Declaration of Independence" of the US. There you will find that you have a duty to can the dictator. Note: DUTY.

    18. Re:Why? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      According to the Wikipedia article on Libya, literacy and education are quite ok there.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    19. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a couple of corrections. First there is no 2nd world or 3rd world anymore (2nd world refered to countries like the former USSR which was a socialist superpower). Today there are only Developed and Developing nations. So Lybia is a moderatly poor developing nation. They used to be extreamly poor until they found oil and derived great wealth from it. Most oil rich nations are moderately poor.

    20. Re:Why? by Tom · · Score: 4, Informative
      Let's check what their dictator has brought them:
      • The highest (or 2nd highest, depending on which sources you trust) standard of living in Africa
      • The highest Human Development Index in Africa, ahead of Russia, Saudia Arabia, Turkey and others like those.
      • One of the highest GDPs in Africa, more than Malaysia, Mexico or Bulgaria
      • Market-oriented reforms and a business boom, currently ongoing
      • Free education for all citizens, resulting in the highest literacy rate in North Africa


      Judge by facts, not because your own dictator says "evil man over there".

      Yes, human rights are still a problem. But a country that just legalised imprisoning people without charge, trial, access to lawyer and for as long as you like is not really the party that should speak accusingly of other parties on this matter.

      Get rid of your own dictator first before you tell others to do so.
      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    21. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true, but in the end, i guess it would depend on what you consider a decent form of government.

      While democrazy might be "by the people" and all that, the law of avarages dosent nessesarily mean a decent government. Just look at america, elections are held, yet the government that comes out is never quite right. You have pork spenders, and other politicians just waiting to abuse the system, rather then fix it. While i know america is not nessesarialy a democrazy, it does illistrate a bad form of "by the people" government.

      Personally, i think the real problem with any system of government is that it exists. Its only real function is to hold together in common bonds a large peice of land. Good for empires and such, not so good for just living. Any government that gets big, will inevitably have abuse in its central systems, which effect the whole of the nation. At such levels, it only takes a few polititians to ruin everything, which is the main problem with democratic governments. Dictators dont have such problems, if you get to be a pain, your killed, if your leader is a pain, well, like i said, not all governments are good, which is why i dont like them either, but, its not like they are evil, if the people are not angry enough to stand up and take control, well, im not going to stick my nose in others bussines, its not nice, and will inevitably lead to more conflicts, which is why i dont like people saying that dictatorships are evil, or less then democrazies, and is why i posted.

      Dont get me wrong, im not for dictators, but im also not for democrazies either. Im just here to provoke some argument.

    22. Re:Why? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >They would be much better served by modern medicine, education
      Have you got the right country? To quote Wikipedia "These oil revenues and a small population give Libya one of the highest GDPs per person in Africa and have allowed the Libyan state to provide an extensive and impressive level of social security, particularly in the fields of housing and education"
      Their standing on human rights still leaves much to be desired but most US sanctions have been pulled now and Condi has been a-visiting to shake hands with the Foreign Minister.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    23. Re:Why? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      FYI, there are 384.2 laptops in a ton.

      Now, how many fit in a Library of Congress?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    24. Re:Why? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      A bit of a tangent, but how do you judge whether a country is "third world" or "second world". These terms seem to have changed an awful lot since they were coined. Originally, the "first world" was the west, the "second world" were the Russians, and the "third world" were those countries that weren't involved in the Cold War (although "third world" had an independant meaning prior to this). What criteria do you use when you judge that a nation isn't a "third world" country anymore? What do they have to do to become "first world"?

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    25. Re:Why? by iBod · · Score: 1

      Absolutley. Freedom to some people just means they are free to go on a rampage and murder the very neighbours they peacefully coexisted with under the previous 'tyrany'.

      IMHO the period of the Cold War was one of the safest and most peaceful ever. It kept the lid on a lot of hate (religious, racial, territorial etc.).

      Just like Saddam in Iraq - that's the leadership they needed! A "strong man". A brute that would keep them in line!

      Now what have they got? Freedom(tm) and total chaos and destruction.

      Freedom is a great thing! Yay!

    26. Re:Why? by jonatha · · Score: 1
      Educated masses are the first step for creating democracies

      Maybe in the Eastern hemisphere. Certainly wasn't (and isn't) the case here....

      --
      The SCO lawsuit makes me wish my company were in Utah. We need a new building.
    27. Re:Why? by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

      Huh, well that's odd. I'd always been taught that "second world" was analogous to a developing nation. In that a third world country had a high birth/death rate, and low industry. Second world countries had a high birth rate/(comparitvly lower) death rate with developing industries. Finally, I was taught First world countries had stablized populations, lower death rate, and highly developed/high-tech industry.

      If we have eliminated second world countries as a category, then I guess my thoughts don't really apply. But I would still call it a developing nation. If my categorization of nations doesn't apply, it makes it much more vague and difficult to determine when you go from third world to first world...

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    28. Re:Why? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      but even then there's better / simpler / easier to carry solutions.

      reallly? so tell me some as I have tried many. nothing will last more than 2-3 days away from all power. this is light and does not need a mule with solar panels to carry the charging system.

      so please oh wise one. what is there that is better, simple and easier for porable computing while in the wild?? I have tried EVERYTHING available commercially and none can handle the needs of daily use and being away from any power source for 5-7 days at a time while being able to take up very little in a backpack.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    29. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even know what the word dictator means?

    30. Re:Why? by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      > Somehow I highly doubt that those kids in the poor countries could engage in any financial relationship with anyone abroad.

      Maybe not, but:
      1 - It's ripe pickings for an entrepreneur with a load of cash and truck to buy all the computers off of the folks for $20 each and sell the slew on eBay for $200 each.
      2 - How many are going to "fall off of the truck," as we say here in the US. You may see whole pallets for sale on eBay.

      jfs

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    31. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you?

      Yeah, I know what you mean. I also know you're displaying a profound example of not getting the point. If you do it on purpose or not, however, I don't know.

    32. Re:Why? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Gee, I dunno. Was Saddam Hussein a dictator? Because the only significant difference between him and your one is he lost the war.

    33. Re:Why? by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

      Before I go any further, let me just say I am in no way upholding Libya as a shining example to the rest of the world. I don't want to sound as if the government there is perfect in everyway or that they have only the concerns of their citizens at heart.

      I disagree with the statement that Libya is the most oppressive state next to North Korea. True, they rank 152 out of 157 in Economic Freedom as well as 162 out of 167 in Press Freedom. But Iran and Burma are below Libya in both. That may just be arguing over technical details, but there is some difference in Libya. Libya is making real attempts to reintegrate itself with the international community.

      That article also paints a very opinionated picture of Libya. Check out some of the Human Development Reports on Libya. They ranked 58 out of 177. Life expectancy at birth 2000-2005? 73.4 years. Combined gross enrolment ratio for primary, secondary and tertiary schools, 2002/03: 96.1% Furthermore, it's oppressive nature is changing aswell, checkout some of the human rights they've accepted. You can check the link above to see individual rankings in enforcement, but they hover around 58 out of 177 on these issues as well:

      International Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 1948
      International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, 1965
      International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966
      International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1966
      Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, 1979
      Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 1984
      Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989

      Libya is making improvements, and that's the difference I sought to point out. the CIA also had this to say:

      "Libyan officials in the past four years have made progress on economic reforms as part of a broader campaign to reintegrate the country into the international fold. This effort picked up steam after UN sanctions were lifted in September 2003 and as Libya announced that it would abandon programs to build weapons of mass destruction in December 2003. Almost all US unilateral sanctions against Libya were removed in April 2004, helping Libya attract more foreign direct investment, mostly in the energy sector. Libya faces a long road ahead in liberalizing the socialist-oriented economy, but initial steps - including applying for WTO membership, reducing some subsidies, and announcing plans for privatization - are laying the groundwork for a transition to a more market-based economy."


      Then again, I'm getting off my main point which simply was that these cheap, robust laptops were a good choice for the Libyan government. It follows along side their steps to improve their country, their economy, and ultimatly their people's lives rather than relying on "hand-outs" of advanced medicine for their oil.

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    34. Re:Why? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      The summary (and possibly TFA which, as is tradition, I didn't read) said the laptops were hand-cranked. Last I heard from the OLPC project, however, they'd dropped this feature. Apparently the torque on the case was proving to be too much of an issue for the electronics inside. Instead, they were going to provide pedal-powered chargers which could be used to quickly charge the batteries.

      Oh, and they are planning on selling them to geeks. Private sales will be handled through retailers (who will charge a mark-up) and profits from these (their wholesale price will also include a mark-up) will be used to offset the cost of future sales, bringing the cost down to under $100.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    35. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of noticing that 3rd world countries are those that are strategically insignificant as an ally to either the USA or USSR, sounds like you (or your teacher) merely noticed that 3rd world countries are "poor" and extrapolated a (wrong) meaning to 2nd and 1st worlds.

    36. Re:Why? by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      Typical Slashdot... trading security for liberty. Typical for this place.

    37. Re:Why? by RoLi · · Score: 1
      Well, that's what oil has brought them.

      If you look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Libya you see that Libya is awfully overpopulated (= the population can only be kept alive with food imports) and getting more so.

      As soon as the oil money can no longer buy enough food imports, expect a big famine. The same goes for Saudi-Arabia, BTW.

    38. Re:Why? by woohoodonuts · · Score: 1

      For navigation in the wild? how about a compass? moss on the trees... the north star and a map. There's plenty of options. If you're talking about some kind of specific computing research that needs to be done for geologic research, then no, I have no solution, but that's not what you said. you mentioned you wanted a computer for camping, and I find that highly amusing because the vast reason most people go camping is to get away from technology. Being this is a geek website with constant wisecracks about not getting out of the parent's basement and such, surely you can spot the irony.

      and next time, try taking the joke with a little bit of salt. no harm intended.

    39. Re:Why? by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      Now what have they got? Freedom(tm) and total chaos and destruction.

      Personally, I'd rather live in a violent, "free" society, where I'm free to do as I choose, then a "safe" society where I have no rights.

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    40. Re:Why? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Charity doesn't work in Africa?" Saying that is like giving the guy on the street corner a buck every few days, and wondering why he isn't going to college after your generous injection of cash.

      Yes, there are several dictators in Africa who enrich themselves at the expense of their people. But there are also many governments in Africa with responsible leadership and relatively little corruption. These are places that know exactly what they need to do to end poverty in their countries, but just don't have the wealth available to invest in themselves. Some are hamstrung by debts to First World countries, and others are stuck with disastrous contracts with multinational corporations arising from past mistakes or simply bad bargaining positions.

      Of course, giving good money to bad governments means that little of that money will reach the intended beneficiaries. But there are programs that have shown themselves very effective, and saying "charity doesn't work in Africa" is less a measured analysis of the problems of the region, and more an unreasoned battle cry for the apathetic. Yes, education works, but it's only part of the solution.

      The debate over how best to approach the problems of Africa are complex and fascinating ones. If you're interested in getting informed about these issues, I'd recommend Jeffrey Sachs' "The End of Poverty", Joseph Stiglitz' books, and (as a counterpoint to my own ideologies) "White Man's Burden," by William Easterly.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    41. Re:Why? by marm · · Score: 1

      (= the population can only be kept alive with food imports)

      Which also holds true for the UK, Japan, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and many other major industrialized nations. Note that the UK and particularly Norway are heavily dependent on oil to prop up their economies. However no-one is seriously suggesting that once the oil money runs out Norway is going to starve: they have a highly-educated population, excellent infrastructure, and everything else required to turn their hand to anything that's profitable. Much of this development (particularly the infrastructure) has happened thanks to sensible spending of the oil revenues while they still have them.

      This is all that Libya is trying to emulate: while the going is good, invest in infrastructure and education, so that the country can diversify its economy and ride the wave when oil finally stops bringing in the euros. Buying low-cost laptops seems like a remarkably good idea as it's an investment in both infrastructure and education at once. It's a shame that some other major oil producing countries aren't following this path, but at least Libya seems to have the right idea now.

    42. Re:Why? by marm · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd rather live in a violent, "free" society, where I'm free to do as I choose, then a "safe" society where I have no rights.

      How about a society that strikes a sensible balance between the two extremes?

      Or indeed where decent education and a strong societal identity and conscience allows the society to be both "free" and "safe"?

    43. Re:Why? by stuartrobinson · · Score: 1

      Get rid of your own dictator first before you tell others to do so. This is ridiculous hyperbole. You can argue about what defines a dictator, but one thing that we can probably all agree on is that they don't have (or, more precisely, don't respect) term limits. Bush is subject to term limits and will be gone as of the next election. Therefore...

    44. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(Score:5, Informative)"

      Slashdot continues to circle the bowl.

    45. Re:Why? by Tom · · Score: 1
      Do you even know what the word dictator means?

      If you had bothered to look it up before assuming that you know the definition, you would've been surprised:

      Dictator was the title of a magistrate in ancient Rome appointed by the Senate to rule the state in times of emergency. In modern usage, it refers to an absolutist or autocratic ruler who assumes sole power over the state

      Let's assume we can dump the old roman definition (though it is very interesting), you will notice that the modern definition says nothing about lack of elections or term limits (as the other poster claimed as being the defining difference).

      Does Bush rule absolutist? I believe most parts of the free world would agree on that. Why, he's even made sure that none of his war crimes can be prosecuted after he's gone, by retroactively legalizing them. He's not yet claiming that he's above the law, but he's one step short of that by simply changing the law so that de facto, he is.
      Does he assume sole power over the state? That's where he might not (yet) qualify. However, remember that he has, essentially, declared a permanent state of war, and is claiming war powers for the president, even extending them wherever possible.

      Quite frankly, if you look at actual politics, I dare to say that Bush is more of an absolutist than Ghaddafi.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    46. Re:Why? by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      How about a society that strikes a sensible balance between the two extremes?

      Or indeed where decent education and a strong societal identity and conscience allows the society to be both "free" and "safe"?

      I would agree that's reasonable. However, I'm speaking specifically of the situation currently in Iraq: Under Saddam Hussein, they had no freedom, but a "safe" society, so long as you didn't cross the powers in charge. Then your safety went to pot. However, now, you're free to do as you choose, speak as you choose, and worship as you choose, but you run the risk of hitting a roadside bomb during your daily affairs. Given a choice between those two options, I'd take my chances with the roadside bombs if it meant I could practice my religion freely.

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    47. Re:Why? by aevans · · Score: 1

      Care to name a government in Africa with responsible leadership and relatively little corruption? Besides Libya of course.

    48. Re:Why? by CrankyOldBastard · · Score: 1

      Conversely, Libya was once a marvellous place full of fruit and food. Then a superpower invaded, genocided them and destroyed their civilisation with chemical weapons (sodium cloride). If Libya chose to, they could put in the infrastructure to restore their lost fields and orchards, using some of the oil money. IF...

    49. Re:Why? by RoLi · · Score: 1

      Carthage is in modern-day Tunisia, not Libya, get your facts straight.

    50. Re:Why? by thylacine222 · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, banning political parties, banning freedom of speech, press, assembly and religion were pretty absolutist.

    51. Re:Why? by Tom · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, banning political parties, banning freedom of speech, press, assembly and religion were pretty absolutist.

      That is true.

      But just because one dictator has found a less crude way to achive the same goal doesn't mean he isn't.

      Bush isn't banning political parties - but then again he doesn't have to as there aren't any real choices left anyways.
      He doesn't ban freedom of speech and the press, but he's made the first inconsequencial (and introduced limits) and the second is so corrupted that it's more useful than a silenced press could ever be.
      Assembly will come whenever it starts to be a threat to his power, just wait.
      Religion is a touchy one. True, there are no limits yet. However, one religion is clearly favoured and is getting his support wherever possible. Just look at the whole Creationism debate, or the stem cell debacle. He is very clearly religiously motivated in lots and lots of the things he does.

      Now when it comes to Libya, check up some sources and you'll be surprised. Yes, it's not a western country, but there is more freedom there (especially regarding religion) than in most other african or middle eastern countries.

      So what it boils down to is comparing one of the worst examples of the 1st world with one of the best examples in the 3rd. And what we see is that they aren't that much apart.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    52. Re:Why? by CrankyOldBastard · · Score: 1

      The straight facts are as follows:

      The western half country now known as Libya was a major part of the Carthagian empire, in fact the term Punic Empire specifically refers to that part of the Empire based on the Three Cities ("Tri Polis" or "Tripolis"). The Western half of Libya is still primarily a Berber homeland, known to the anciant Greeks as "Lebu", from which we get the term Libya. Tunisia became a country in the latter half of the 18th century. Libya (the country, not the place where Berbers live) was created just before WWII. One of it's major regions was Tripolitania - the same region previously known as "Tri Polis". Tri Polis was a breadbasket (along with the lakes whose exact position is uncertain these days) for Carthage, with major irrigation works. Ruins of the irrigation systems were still there during WWII, when the aqueducts were used for target practice by the British.

      So yes, Carthage has been in Tunisia for about 125 years. It was in Libya for nearly 2500 years before that. In my previous post I didnt actually say that Carthage was in Libya you'll note - yet you knew exactly what civilisation I was talking about. The fact remains that there is enough money from oil that the Libyan Government (Gaddafi) could restore the Three Cities area to agricultural productivity if he chose - or more likely if his "Desert Voices" told him to.

    53. Re:Why? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      According to Jeffrey Sachs, Ethiopia and Mauritius are such countries. According to Transparency International's ratings, Tunisia and Mauritius rank way higher than a lot of our more beloved trading partners. A quick squint at their map seems to say that corruption in Africa isn't obviously better or worse than corruption in Asia, which has been doing substantially better in the economic development department.

      It's difficult to make the case that government corruption is the biggest impediment to fighting poverty in Africa. My belief is that we've been providing too little aid, and when we do give we pay too much attention to what we think countries need, rather than what they actually say they need. We're especially guilty of using foreign aid to promote harmful, "self-sacrificing" fiscal policies on third world nations (see Stiglitz).

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  4. New Meaning by Cytlid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gives a new meaning to "cranking one out".

    --
    FLR
  5. back to the future by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Obligatory back to the future quote:
    "It's the Lybians!"

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:back to the future by meccaneko · · Score: 1

      Hopefully these laptops work and arent just just plastic casings filles with old pinball machine parts!

  6. Before the comments roll in... by arun_s · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... about third world countries needing food and medicine more (god I can't stand those comments!), here's a very nice article I found through reddit about what happened when an Indian computer chap put a comp in a slum in the capital city.
    Its 6 years old but sure makes for nice reading. Stuff like that makes the OLPC worth it IMO.

    --
    I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
    1. Re:Before the comments roll in... by benk81 · · Score: 1

      Great link, thanks.

    2. Re:Before the comments roll in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow!! that one link pretty much destroys the argument that 3rd world countries should not worry too much about getting computers. I suppose I never believed that computers could be useful too, Istand corrected

      It may also destroy the idea that community PCs wont work (which is why the 100$ laptop)... What with the kids inventing alltogether new terms to describe mouse and the hourglass!!

    3. Re:Before the comments roll in... by aflat362 · · Score: 1

      Putting one computer in the middle of a slum is one thing. Buying 1.2 million computers is quite another. Really, why not buy one or a few computers for a slum and oh say . . . a clean water supply?

      --

      Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

    4. Re:Before the comments roll in... by asuffield · · Score: 1

      You should try comparing this to the effects of spending a few million dollars on building and running schools. The question here is not "does this accomplish anything?", it's "is this the most cost-effective way?". Make no mistake, this is money that has been taken away from other projects (although given the rather dubious Libyan government, it would be hard to work out what). You don't have to show that it's worthwhile, you have to show that it's more worthwhile than the things it is replacing.

  7. Would be nice.. by joshetc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If someone out there cared about US citizens. I am sure there are tons of kids out there that could use a $100 laptop, even some grownups. Were stuck with buying them in pairs of 3s and getting one of the 3 at some undisclosed time in the future.. anyone know if these will ever be sold retail in the USA? I'd take one of these over a PDA any day.

    Also I had heard they were going to remove the wind-up power, I guess they changed their mind again? I think these seem really cool and would love to get my hands on one...

    1. Re:Would be nice.. by solevita · · Score: 0

      Funny you should say that; OLPC detractors often say "if giving laptops to kids is such a good idea, why don't we start the project at home?" Two replies have been formed: 1; a laptop for every kid in the world isn't actually a very good idea, or 2; we care more about third world children than our own.

      Whatever argument you decide to use, the lack of these things in the West is still visible, as noticed by yourself.

    2. Re:Would be nice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there is someone who cares about U.S. citizens, it called the American Government, OLPC only sell to governments, so if the current administration or the department of education has some spare cash then I'm sure the deal wouldn't be a problem.

      The power generator is not "wind-up" but rather a cord that is pulled out of a reel spinning a flywheel and the dynamo, it's supposed to work quite well.

      Although it would be frowned upon a few devices will inevitably end up on ebay.

    3. Re:Would be nice.. by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``Although it would be frowned upon a few devices will inevitably end up on ebay.''

      Yeah, I can see it now:

      $100 laptop sold on eBay for $3735928559

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    4. Re:Would be nice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you. The part with "buying them inpairs of 3s" took me a bit of time to digest though :)

    5. Re:Would be nice.. by arpad1 · · Score: 1

      Although it would be frowned upon a few devices will inevitably end up on ebay.

      A few? Try "a few pallet loads". Or "a few dozen pallet loads". Maybe "a few hundred pallet loads".

      These gadgets are going to countries where graft and corruption are an accepted part of daily life. Who's going to hand the OLPCs out? The government officials who unashamedly solicit graft at every turn.

      And who are they supposed to go to? Poor children. How much clout to poor children have? How much clout to their poor parents have? Their teachers? The most powerful people in countries with culturally-ingrained corruption are just going to hand these OLPCs, which will be resellable, by the tens of thousands to the least powerful people in those countries.

      Yeah, I can see that happening.

      If Negroponte weren't so taken with the role of Great White Father, Champion of the Less Fortunate, Prince of the Poor and Guide Across the Bridge to the Twenty-First Century he might understand that what's simply given away is often thrown away and the people at whom the OLPCs are aimed are people who won't have a clue what they are or what they're good for.

      The reason I'm sure Negroponte sees himself as the Great White Father is his disdainful attitude toward commercialization. If he had a lick of sense he'd try to get some big retailer, Wallmart comes to mind, interested because when a $150 or $180 computer with the OLPCs capabilities hits the shelves they'll sell out in a heartbeat. Hit up manufacturers for reasonable licensing fees and he's got the money to design Son of OLPC without having to go begging for the money.

      The manufacturing capacity is self-supporting, not dependent on the unreliable flow of government money, and the price point alone guarantees that the machines will make it into the hands of anyone who wants one in the US/Europe. The form-factor/price-point is established as viable so other outfits get into the fray coming out with their own knock-offs. In the countries currently targeted for OLPC distribution, the machines are bought by people who understand their value and can make use of their capabilities. Purpose-designed chipsets will follow making Son of OLPC cheaper, more capable and more attractive to the poor people at whom it was originally aimed.

      On the other hand, if millions of OLPCs are simply handed out then the manufacturers, knowing the money comes from people who may decide tomorrow that some new, exciting technology/cause/crisis is more important then the OLPC, will get while the getting is good foregoing investment in a market that could disappear like a cool breeze. If Negroponte defends the OLPC vigorously enough he'll delay the development of the commercial market and the price-cutting power of the market.

      This process is already occurring in those countries but not with computers, with cell phones. Those folks just love their cell phones and it's not hard to understand why. For the first time in their lives that have reliable, affordable, convenient communication. No bribing of a government telephone monopoly clerk, no multi-year waits, no worries about getting a dial tone. You just hand over a reasonable amount of money to someone who'd love to see you again - that "repeat" business thing - and you're talking to cousin Waldo on the other side of town or the other side of the world. No government handouts necessary and no wringing your hands over somebody making an honest dollar off the gadgets.

      --
      Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  8. Also by Se7enLC · · Score: 1, Funny

    A nuclear bomb made from pinball machine parts.

  9. how about one laptop per child in US? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We dont have one laptop per child here, not even close. Why is it that we're not on top of this stuff, yet we're happy to catapult other countries ahead by selling them the laptops?

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:how about one laptop per child in US? by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      We dont have one laptop per child here, not even close

      because that would be socialism, apparently (which is way bad). strangely enough, spending $300 billion to fix iraq for iraqis is just peachy.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    2. Re:how about one laptop per child in US? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``strangely enough, spending $300 billion to fix iraq for iraqis is just peachy.''

      That should be "over $300 billion" and "\"fix\"".

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    3. Re:how about one laptop per child in US? by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      so why don't YOU buy notebooks and give them to poor children? because that would be spending your own money, apparently (which is way bad).
      try living in a socialist country like mine before spewing bullshit, thanks

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    4. Re:how about one laptop per child in US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The United States treats its socialism the way a priest treats masturbation -- it does it very rarely, with a great amount of guilt, and tries very hard to ignore the amount of relief it brings.

    5. Re:how about one laptop per child in US? by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      so why don't YOU buy notebooks and give them to poor children?

      where's the profit in that?

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    6. Re:how about one laptop per child in US? by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Heh,

      giorgiofr, you forget you are speaking to an American Liberal. The kind of socialist that the leaders of the old Soviet Union used to call "Useful idiots". What else would you expect BUT bullshit from them?

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    7. Re:how about one laptop per child in US? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      who is this "we"

      OLPC makes the laptops and sells them to governments, they would be stupid to waste all their current capital giving the machines away and running out of money. If the US government wanted to buy these, or probably even a state government they would be available to american children

      another problem is that in america kids usually have too much computer access rather than too little.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    8. Re:how about one laptop per child in US? by enrevanche · · Score: 1
      another problem is that in america kids usually have too much computer access rather than too little

      While this is true, there are many children in the U.S. with very little access. These are the children who would benefit from these, not the average suburban brat. Politically, our current administration would like to get rid of public schools, much less fund an iniative to aid the poor.

    9. Re:how about one laptop per child in US? by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      Uh, I don't know, because we'd actually prefer to educate kids, and giving them laptops doesn't really do a damn thing, education-wise?

    10. Re:how about one laptop per child in US? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, most of that money is going straight back into the pockets of hard-working Americans, like the CEO of Halliburton.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    11. Re:how about one laptop per child in US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, you're far more in the know for pointing at people and ritualistically cleansing your mind of anything they say by shouting "liberal". That really makes you the epitome of an independent thinker.

      Useful idiots indeed.

  10. Let's see how well this goes by belal1 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    let's see how well this actually goes. personally, i doubt the children will actually be using the laptops. instead i am very certain the parents will either sell it or the kids will get robbed by some local militia that always seems to pop up in every african country. eitherway, the kids won't have the laptops as projected and a black market is going to spawn up.

    what i don't understand is, many places in libya don't even have electricity so how will the servers that each school is supposedly going to house, be powered? don't tell me someone will stand by 24-7 foot peddling for some juice...

    1. Re:Let's see how well this goes by mattr · · Score: 1

      If it is the same basic design Negroponte has been selling, then powered machines create a mesh by automatic ad hoc networking with other laptops. Though I have not heard of details, if I were designing it I'd provide free software that would turn any wired pc into a hub for this too. Power from hand cranking if necessary (perhaps if you are on a trip or in the boonies), also gives a kid the ability to be portable and take it as a book with him or her. Don't know if networking would be powered on all the time if you are in crank mode though. Maybe someone at the media lab could provide some info on battery lifetime, resolution, software specs. These are intended for non-U.S. places and mainly for kids. That said, your note about militias is valid and the only hope is that the military dictator also cares about his kids and tells his underlings so. However I am a little bit worried that the networking element would make kids trackable and possibly targets. In Cambodia I heard that radios would become military targets (this is in the 90s). On the other hand if you make enough pcs, the military can have one each too if they must. Maybe they will start blogging!

    2. Re:Let's see how well this goes by Magada · · Score: 1

      Lybia is not Eritreea, buddy. It's not even the Congo. It's a highly stable, highly opressive dictatorship under a bona-fide paranoid leader by the name of Mu'ammar Abu Minyar al-Qadhafi . Not a leave moves (not that there are many) in that country without him or his cronies knowing about it. No "local militia" or high-level organised crime is allowed to take root. The country is only poor because of economic sanctions (imposed by the UN following the Lockerbie incident). It's on its way up again, as the sanctions were lifted and there's a lot of oil there.
      It's also one of the few countries to have attempted a terraforming project.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    3. Re:Let's see how well this goes by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      Damn! So I'm going to start getting spam emails from Lybians claiming to be the hiers/bankers/lawyers of millions of dollars of cash. If I just give them my bank account number I can share in that wealth/get a % fee. What's the IP code for Lybia I need to set my spam blocker up now and just send them all to junk mail.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    4. Re:Let's see how well this goes by smchris · · Score: 1

      From the CIA factbook:

      Substantial revenues from the energy sector coupled with a small population give Libya one of the highest per capita GDPs in Africa, but little of this income flows down to the lower orders of society.

      Qadhafi sees himself as a player in pan-African politics. This is the sort of thing he can afford to do for "his" people and the neighboring countries. Cynicism aside, it's good to see an African purchase.

      (As a side note, I thought there was recently an article that the price was going up to $140? Discount on million unit sales?)

    5. Re:Let's see how well this goes by AliasN · · Score: 1

      They'll probably also be spelled as poorly as your post. "Libya, the answer we were looking for was L-i-b-y-a." It's nice to hear that the first thing you think of kids with laptops is mass spam. And hey, if one person does it, why not just block every single email from Libya? Sounds like a fantastic idea for someone who labels a whole age group and a whole country as spamemrs.

    6. Re:Let's see how well this goes by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      When will people who bitch about spelling learn to spell? ("spamemrs") Oh sorry, you did it deliberately? I think that excuse grew old from my 4th grade teacher. I don't rely giv a dam about spelin on /. n it seams kneever doo you/u/ewe mi bruva.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    7. Re:Let's see how well this goes by AliasN · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's called a typo. Typo: an abbreviation for typographical error. An error in the typeset copy.

    8. Re:Let's see how well this goes by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      Call it a typo or a pink elephant it's still poor spelling by someone who was complaining about spelling. Fess up dude, you messed up trying to tell me I messed up. I just find the general irony funny, not you, nothing more.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    9. Re:Let's see how well this goes by AliasN · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'll give you that. I really need to learn to use the preview button more. To myself: RTFM nubcakes!

  11. Too Bad India Opted Out by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I never thought I'd say this, but I wish India would follow Libya and reconsider--I mean this is the first time a humanitarian effort has strongly targeted learning tools. Food & medicine are important, but I sincerely hope we can show those we help how to continue to support themselves with tools like this.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  12. Re:sounds evil to me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a plan. We need to do something to help us continue to ignore North Korea!

  13. Great Scott! by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Funny

    Man. Those Libyians are going to be really pissed when they find out that their plutonium wasn't used to power the laptops.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Great Scott! by sharkey · · Score: 1

      How fast DO you have to crank to produce 1.21 jiggawatts of electricity on these things?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Great Scott! by ungerware · · Score: 1

      88 mph

      --

      -----
      Kvetch is Yiddish for "throw an exception" --Dr. Ron Cytron
  14. Wind up? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    I thought the OLPC people decided that the hand crank was too much stress on the frame of the computer and went away from that model? Does this mean that they are going back to hand cranks, or that the crank is detached from the computer?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:Wind up? by jginspace · · Score: 1
      Does this mean that they are going back to hand cranks, or that the crank is detached from the computer?

      I posted just one minute after you. According to this: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_myths the crank has been dropped and ...
      The hand crank was there in early prototypes but the actual shipping units will use an off-board human-power system, connected to the power brick. Candidates include a foot-pedal charger similar to the Freecharge portable charger.
  15. Wind-up crank? by jginspace · · Score: 2, Informative

    The laptops offer internet access and are powered by a wind-up crank.

    Is this more shoddy BBC journalism? I thought this had been dropped from the OLPC spec a while ago?

    1. Re:Wind-up crank? by compm375 · · Score: 1

      I believe it is. Also it seems they failed to mention that the laptops haven't reached the $100 price point yet and will start at $150, and that Libya is paying $250 million total for all the laptops and infrastructure.

    2. Re:Wind-up crank? by jginspace · · Score: 2, Informative

      (Replying to myself...)

      ...it seems the OLPC site still mentions it ... when you hover the mouse over the FAQ. However it's not mentioned in the actual FAQ and this page http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_myths puts things straight.

      Glad that's sorted.

    3. Re:Wind-up crank? by NekoXP · · Score: 1

      Yes. Journalist gets a Reuters news feed, remembers stuff he half-=read one day on the same subject, cobbles together article, publishes, collects paycheck.

      They haven't even met their $100 target even without the laptop. Maybe Libya will buy them for $100, but they don't "cost" that on the BOM even without the handcrank :D

  16. Libya: highest std of living in Africa by gelfling · · Score: 5, Informative

    Please do some reasearch. Libya is a huge thinly populated country with oil. It has the highest or second highest std of living in Africa. Most middle class people speak Italian (former colony). If anyone in a '3rd world' country can make use of cheap computers, it's them.

    1. Re:Libya: highest std of living in Africa by ProppaT · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't understand how having the highest STD rate in Africa means they could make use of laptops better than any other third world nation? Or even having oil for that matter... Not saying it's not nice for them and they won't make good use of the laptops, but that's roughly the equivelant of me saying "John Adams High School has the highest rate of teenage pregnancies in the state and the highest wealth per capita in the county, therefore if anyone could use new textbooks, it's them."

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    2. Re:Libya: highest std of living in Africa by GCsoftware · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're an idiot.

    3. Re:Libya: highest std of living in Africa by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      std of living = "standard of living", has nothing to do with sexually transmitted diseases.
      But now that you bring it up, extrapolating from AIDS I'd say that the STD rate is rather lower in Libya than in most of Africa. Assuming that the data on that page is accurate, of course. The distribution in that graph is a bit odd (notice which countries are colored green).

    4. Re:Libya: highest std of living in Africa by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      I suspect the GP meant 'standard of living', not a reference to sexually-transmitted infections. A rich country with a high standard of living will have economic prospects for internet-based businesses started in a few years by grown-up OLPChildren.

    5. Re:Libya: highest std of living in Africa by Ant+P. · · Score: 3, Funny

      Joke->    ~~~>

                  O
      You->      -+-
                 / \

    6. Re:Libya: highest std of living in Africa by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Libya is a huge thinly populated country with oil.

      Like Canada?

  17. I'm quite nerdy and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a native english speaker. I had to "Google image" for "wind-up crank" (Of course didn't try to read TFA which may or may not contain a picture of the "wind-up crank" and which may or may be not already be /.ed). Anyway, the images that comes up makes me think that somehow a "wind-up crank" is not that much of a tech device ;)

  18. Read the Summary At Least by eldavojohn · · Score: 1
    let's see how well this actually goes. personally, i doubt the children will actually be using the laptops. instead i am very certain the parents will either sell it or the kids will get robbed by some local militia that always seems to pop up in every african country. eitherway, the kids won't have the laptops as projected and a black market is going to spawn up.
    They want to make these laptops brightly colored so that if an adult is seen with one of them, it will be widely known that they have stolen from children. You have no idea how powerful social stigmas can be.

    what i don't understand is, many places in libya don't even have electricity so how will the servers that each school is supposedly going to house, be powered? don't tell me someone will stand by 24-7 foot peddling for some juice...
    Read the summary:
    The laptops offer internet access and are powered by a wind-up crank.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Read the Summary At Least by belal1 · · Score: 1
      They want to make these laptops brightly colored so that if an adult is seen with one of them, it will be widely known that they have stolen from children. You have no idea how powerful social stigmas can be.
      it wont' matter. the level of shame decreases if a large percentage of the population accepts it and the fact that libya is a poverty stricken nation, the vast majority won't mind. in third world countries it doesn't matter if you're wearing fruity colored clothes (or tasteless fashion) because the population is too poor to care how they look. Same thing will happen with these laptops. if worst comes to worst, they'll just spray paint it or something to another color.
      The laptops offer internet access and are powered by a wind-up crank.
      read what I said, i asked about the SERVERS. Not the laptops themselves. The laptops power supply has already been discussed (for quite a few months now) but as for the servers themselves, that's a different story. I imagine the servers to be much much bigger than the laptop themselves (obviously but who knows, maybe they might have engineered some small servers?) so keeping tehse servers active 24-7 will be a serious problem if the villages themselves (where the school is located) don't have electricity.
    2. Re:Read the Summary At Least by belal1 · · Score: 0
      According to this article: http://business.bostonherald.com/technologyNews/vi ew.bg?articleid=161975
      The $250 million deal, reached Tuesday, would provide the nation with 1.2 million computers, a server in each school, a team of technical advisers, satellite internet service and other infrastructure.
    3. Re:Read the Summary At Least by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Why do they need huge servers? It's not like they're bloated down with windows here. A micro-atx PC with a big hard disk, wireless and a modem would get the job done. That could easily run off a solar panel.

  19. Its... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...about time to waste billions of tax dollars and young lives to liberate Lybia from computer addiction... ...hell those poor children might end up playing WOW the whole day!!!

    Think of the children and join the army!!!

  20. food for energy by kemo_by_the_kilo · · Score: 1

    wait, so these starving frail kids have to do physical labor to operater this thing? doesnt exercise make you more hungry? ...
    ....seriously though... im glad they did this. i still think that the major problem with america is the fact we still life for the now and not the long term. i mean this laptop purchase wont help the 3rd world countries, until they are smarter then the rich.
    america look out... as a fool and his money are soon parted.
    educate and we wont be fools.

    1. Re:food for energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Libya, not Ethiopia.

    2. Re:food for energy by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      What do laptops have to do with education? Nothing. Let's teach kids the basics: reading, writing, and the rest of it. ;)

      I have to question the education level of Slashdot posters who think that giving laptops to kids will be a magic cure for education. ;)

  21. These kids are going to get sued! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Hardware_specification -> What makes this system unique?

    Wireless mesh: Child-child sharing! OLPC Laptops are full-time wireless routers. Mesh networking reduces the need for dedicated infrastructure (e.g. access points and/or cabling), and extends greatly the areas in which machines may be connected to each other and/or to the internet.

    OMG! P2P, RIAA sue these freeloaders now!

  22. Beowolf Cluster by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 0

    Yes, someone has to mention the Beowolf Cluster.....

    I think the Lybian leader is still upset with how the US treated him in the 80's. He just wants all these networked together to do some nasty weapons calculations. If he had ordered a lot of standard desktop computers all at once, people would start to wonder what's up.

    1. Re:Beowolf Cluster by belal1 · · Score: 0

      either that or he wants to trade pr0n pics of all his female body guards. maybe he wants to foster a small pr0n industry in the disguise of "helping children" ? i hate the leader so i can't/won't/refuse to trust this guy.

    2. Re:Beowolf Cluster by dbIII · · Score: 1
      I think the Lybian leader is still upset with how the US treated him in the 80's.

      Well, unscrupulous press agents in the white house made a big deal was made of the success of the air raid because it killed some of his adopted kids even though it missed him - so I'm sure he's personally as pissed off with former administrations as Dubya was about an attempt on his father. I've heard the 20th aniversery of the bombing was marked by a a peace concert with a lot of rock bands - history has moved on.

      Giving educational support is also very different to things like the current military support to far nastier places like Algeria - special ops could pick up some bad habits worse than the bad habits picked up from Iraqi jailers.

  23. Not wind-up. WIND up. by aapold · · Score: 1

    It has a little windmill that connects via a cable and harnesses the power of the desert winds.... when they rise, the teacher can yell "wind up", so students can get them out quickly and do a lesson while it lasts.....


    okay, that was pretty lame. its not worth ruining my average postinthwhoops.asdflksubmit

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  24. Is Libya not on the list by babelworx · · Score: 1

    of countries to whom you can't export cryptography? Maybe this gives a new meaning to "open" source computing

  25. Improves Morals by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can't type, wind the crank, and wind the crank, all at the same time. An internet ready computer that can't be used for porn? Amazing!

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    1. Re:Improves Morals by TekJannsen · · Score: 1

      Kind of like a car without a gas pedal.

  26. populations evaluations by KurtisKiesel · · Score: 1

    Lybia has 5.7 million people and if you do the math( 1.2/5.7=~0.21) that means that 21% of the population will now have a computer and that logicaly 100% of the population will have access to a machine since 1 in 5 people will have one in their hands. I wonder just how this will effect everyone there? I wonder if they will have internet access? Some of the possibilities are endless. But realisticly I think we are going to have to worry about a new generation of phishers and spammers.

  27. We will see, lotsa gotchas tho: by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 0
    Talk about the blind leading the blind!

    In case you slept thru Social Studies, Libya:

    • Is a "peoples Jamanzbxvcnzbcnbzochira". OpenOffice spellchecker doesnt have this word.
    • Is run by your basic wild and crazy guy.
    • Who, next to North Korea, probably has the worlds worst messed-up economy.
    • Not to mention a traditional culture which isnt real hot on modern concepts like freedom, equality for women, or much of anything we can identify with.
    • If one were to guess what will happen to these laptops:
      • 35% will "disappear" before they get to the schools.
      • 35% will "disappear" between the school's loading dock and the classrooms.
      • 30% will be used just once, in rote fashion, to pull up "www.khadaffi.gov", so look at heroic photos of the great leader wearing various styles of classy italian sunglasses.
    • 100% of them will "disappear" or "break", or really break within a month.

    This is not all that basically different from that scene in "Airplane!" where they're showing the natives how to burp Tupperware.

  28. spending $300 billion to fix iraq for iraqis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Knock Knock"

    "Who's there?"

    "America"

    "America who?"

    "Everybody Down On The Motherfucking Ground Or I'll Blow Your Motherfucking Heads Off Mothefucker"

    1. Re:spending $300 billion to fix iraq for iraqis by AliasN · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like a rapper to me.

  29. Actually by Flying+pig · · Score: 1
    Given what is happening in Somalia, Iraq, Congo and so forth, I suspect most Libyans would take an oppressive dictator who wants to be well thought of by the rest of the world over competing warlords any day of the week. And I doubt the British or US governments will be polling Iraqis any time soon to see if they prefer the present state of affairs (and over 600 000 deaths in a few years) over Saddam.

    The UK has had over 350 years of working at democracy. The US has had over 200. We have had time to get fairly good at it and evolve civil societies. Libya hasn't.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
    1. Re:Actually by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1
      and over 600 000 deaths in a few years
      Study Says Iraqi Death Toll at 655k 2006-10-12 7:46 Rejected

      I hope someone else's submission goes through so that we can have a proper discussion about it on /., I'm crap at writing summaries anyway.
      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
  30. Wind-up laptop by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1

    What a brilliant name. It rolls off the tounge nicely.

    If was of a really high spec you could call it a tip-top wind-up laptop.

  31. Ihre Papiere schnell by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 2, Funny

    "First of all every people should get rid of of their own dictator."

    Gitmo for you

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  32. I want to challenge your perceptions. by burnttoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Africa is not some dust bowl or rain forests full of poisonous monkeys.

    It is a rich continent and although technology ("progress?") hasn't reached every corner that does not mean the images of doe eyed children starving to death in the middle of nowhere are emblematic of the entire continent.

    Something the computer _CAN_ provide is information. What I mean is you can take all the supplies you like but unless you have a hand book or instruction manual those supplies (unless it is just food aid) are all but useless. Imagine having the biggest reference book ever openly available for you and your tutors. Want to build a damn for hydroelectricity in your village? Search for it. Want to build a wind turbine? Search for it then search for companies that can supply and ship components you can't make.

    When you talk of providing modern medicine - yes, great. Now look at who rapes who. The "west" (with its extraordinarily tight grip of patents, trademarks, copyrights on most modern drugs) is implicit in the denial of medicine to these countries. Why? Because the corporations of the west will not sell drugs in those countries at the low prices required.

    Libya is certainly not as ravaged as your post would indicate. It's a rich(ish) country with food, oil, medicine etc etc. Although maybe their dictator is a bit loco. Then again, he certainly seems to have grown up a lot over the last 20 years.

    Other problems in Africa (Darfur, Ethiopea, Eritrea, Congo Basin etc) are cause by _WAR_. If it wasn't for the gutless inaction of the UN then maybe, just maybe those problems would have been sorted out (or at least the long road to recovery) long ago.

    Sorry if it sounds like I'm ranting but.. well.. I guess I am.

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    1. Re:I want to challenge your perceptions. by dankh · · Score: 1
      Libya is certainly not as ravaged as your post would indicate. It's a rich(ish) country with food, oil, medicine etc.
      Here I can partialy agree with you. Yes Libya is a rich country because of oil but all the profit goes to Gaddafi (and his proteges, family etc.).
      When you talk of providing modern medicine - yes, great. Now look at who rapes who.
      When others provide medicine help, they risk their lives in this country because Gaddafi's dictature and propagana : "If something is wrong in Lybia it's UE's fault , US fault, Israel fault, not mine".Libya has sentenced five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor to death by firing squad for deliberately infecting some 400 children with HIV. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDS_scandal_in_Libya These nurses and the doctar are in prison since 1998 waiting for the final sentence.
      Something the computer _CAN_ provide is information.
      Yes information, but what kind of information ? Propaganda ! I know from now what desktop background the laptops will come with (Gaddafi with AK-47). And last but not least look how China filters Internet, yes kids will get information but only the infromation that Gaddafi wants.
      --
      PuTTY makes Windows usable
    2. Re:I want to challenge your perceptions. by dankh · · Score: 1
      Libya is certainly not as ravaged as your post would indicate. It's a rich(ish) country with food, oil, medicine etc.
      Here I can partially agree with you. Yes Libya is a rich country because of oil but all the profit goes to Gaddafi (and his proteges, family etc.).
      When you talk of providing modern medicine - yes, great. Now look at who rapes who.
      When others provide medicine help, they risk their lives in this country because Gaddafi's dictature and propagana : "If something is wrong in Lybia it's EU fault , USA fault, Israel fault, not mine".Libya has sentenced five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor to death by firing squad for deliberately infecting some 400 children with HIV. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDS_scandal_in_Libya These nurses and the doctor are in prison since 1998 waiting for the final sentence even if doctors and specialists world wide have stated that they are innocent and the infection is because of the bad sanitary situation in Libyan hospitals.
      Something the computer _CAN_ provide is information.
      Yes information, but what kind of information ? Propaganda ! I bet with what desktop background the laptops will come to children (e.g. Gaddafi with AK-47). And last but not least look how China's communist government filters Internet, yes kids in Libya will get information and knowledge but Gaddafi's information and knowledge.
      --
      PuTTY makes Windows usable
    3. Re:I want to challenge your perceptions. by RoLi · · Score: 1
      When you talk of providing modern medicine - yes, great. Now look at who rapes who. The "west" (with its extraordinarily tight grip of patents, trademarks, copyrights on most modern drugs) is implicit in the denial of medicine to these countries. Why? Because the corporations of the west will not sell drugs in those countries at the low prices required.

      You don't seem to understand the difference between patents, trademarks and copyrights. Trademarks and copyrights are irrelevant for drugs, please get yourself informed.

      For patents, just in case you didn't know: They expire in about 15-20 years depending on jurisdiction.

      So every drug available in the mid 1980's is patent free today, which means that even without a single patent you could easily get to the state-of-the-art of medicine of the mid-1980's, which is actually pretty good compared to anything Africans ever developed or invented.

      But whining about the evil west is easier than actually working on the problem.

    4. Re:I want to challenge your perceptions. by aevans · · Score: 1

      You're right, Africa is both a dust bowl and a rain forest full of poisonous Monkeys. And a savannah full of Lions & Elephants in between. But Libya happens to be in the dust bowl part of it.

    5. Re:I want to challenge your perceptions. by aevans · · Score: 1

      Other problems in Africa are caused by war, which is triggered by famine, drought, disease, starvation, etc. Things that are common in Africa. It really is the most inhospitable climate, all around, and modern technology has lead to survival rates that cause overpopulation that lead to the causes of wars.

  33. India is purchasing Intel's offering by everphilski · · Score: 1

    ...Intel claims that orders have been received from Mexico, Nigeria, India, and Brazil. It is worth noting that India evaluated the OLPC 2B1 laptop and decided not to purchase any.

    Intel's offering is beefier and costs ~$100 more. Also note that Intel doesn't have a minimum order of 1,000,000 units unlike the OLPC project.

  34. Oil. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Informative

    Companies are falling all over themselves in order to gain exploration contracts there.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Oil. by aethogamous · · Score: 1
      Companies are falling all over themselves in order to gain exploration contracts there.
      I think that should actually read

      "Companies are falling all over themselves in order to gain exploitation contracts there."

  35. Std of living = "standard of living" by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Grandparent is partially wrong, by the way, but he wasn't talking about AIDS. Libya's oil wealth gives rise to a very stratified society -- you're either cut into the oil profits (a socialist regime rewarding supporters and screwing the rest of the country -- stop the presses!), or you're in a situation such that "poor" does not even begin to describe your life. Like many African nations it STILL has a slavery problem. Thats slavery like "I own you and can sell you at will", for folks who are used to hearing the later-day American interpretation "I employ you and don't pay you as much as you'd like to earn". I'll give you one guess as to your likelihood of getting a laptop as a slave that the government (sole laptop distributor) says doesn't exist.

  36. Open market / Black market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 2B1 laptop will not be sold on the open market. What I want to know is why not!
    Who here would buy this for $100? I would buy one just for the gadget value, especially the green/white one with the funky wireless antenna (If that is the final design).

    Why not avoid the black market by flooding the market?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2B1

  37. Libya is no longer a state sponsor of terrorism by tepples · · Score: 1

    You mean was on the list. The current list of state sponsors of terrorism is down to Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, and Syria.

  38. Really? by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Iraq is a classic example of 'how not to do regime change' then Lybia is a classic example of 'how to do it right'.

    Regime change?

    So Gaddafi is no longer the boss in Lybia? No, he's still there.
    But it's a democracy now, right? No, still dictator for life.
    At least, he's not a terrorist, is he? Well, it's been proved that Lybia has destroyed at least 2 airliners.

    If the official story about Lybia was true, it would be such an asset for the current administration that they would be talking about it every day. Yet, Gaddafi's "redemption" receives a surprisingly low media coverage.

    When you read between the lines, you realize that Gaddafi got an exceptional deal. 1. He got pardoned for his terrorist acts, 2. economic sanctions were lifted, 3. the US has stopped trying to kill him. In exchange for that : 1. he gave up a non-existing WMD program, 2. he paid a token sum to his victims' families, 3. he gave up terrorist activities (which he had not been able to pursue in the latest 10 years because of the embargo). In exchange, US/UK got 1. drilling rights for Lybian oil, 2. a good PR case for their "War against Terror" (TM) brand.

    The irony is that, in 2003, Iraq and Lybia were very similar. Both were led by homicidal madmen, both were under UN embargo, both had no WMD, both were rich in oil.

    There were just 2 differences. Lybia was actually a terrorist state and Iraq was not willing to give access to it's oil.

    Guess which one was invaded...

    --

    It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
    1. Re:Really? by chill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WTF are you smoking? Libya turned over a crapload of chemical weapons, and unveiled their bio and nuclear labs that were a lot more advanced than our intelligence had suggested. Ghadaffi's redemption got plenty of media coverage when it happened. Iraq is an ONGOING event, so it gets tons more.

      Iraq gave plenty of access to it's oil -- it was selling as much as it could, as fast as it could to finance it's war with Iran.

      You forgot the teensy fact that we had tens of thousands of troops sitting next door to Iraq; had suppressed most of their military; and had all the logistics already in place. Iraq was primed, Libya was not. Iraq was a perfect buffer to Iran -- we don't give a shit about a buffer with Tunisia, Algeria or Egypt. Libya complied with the conditions set upon it by the World Court and U.N., Iraq did not.

      There are plenty of things to bash this administration about without having to make some up.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:Really? by craagz · · Score: 0

      man its Libya not Lybia

    3. Re:Really? by MadTinfoilHatter · · Score: 3, Funny

      So Gaddafi is no longer the boss in Lybia?

      Not only that, but Libya is no longer spelled "Libya" either.

    4. Re:Really? by TDRighteo · · Score: 1
      he paid a token sum to his victims' families

      The amount is 2.7 billion USD. That's a lot of money here in Australia, which has (almost precisely) 10 times the GDP of Libya (US$64 billion). (For reference, the GDP of the US is $12 trillion.)

      So assuming that you could simply compare percentages of GDP for hardship (which you shouldn't, but it provides a guide) that would be roughly equivalent to the US handing over US$504 billion. No way is that a token sum.

      If you want to take it another way, the 2005 CIA-estimated budget expenditure of Libya was ~$15.5 billion. 17% of your annual budget for compensation ain't bad.

      Oh, and just remember, the figure $2.7 billion because it's $10 million for every victim of Pan Am. That's never going to be enough for their families and doesn't excuse the act, but deaths due to state actions rarely attract that sort of compensation.

      You're right that Libya & Gaddafi were state sponsors of terrorism against the US, UK & Israel, but that should be enough without you accusing them of being stingy too.

    5. Re:Really? by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 1

      First, sorry for the spelling. It's Libya, of course. Now to answer your post :

      The reports I've seen about Libyan WMD were even more vague than those about Iraq. Libya is a tiny country which had been under severe embargo for 20 years. I've got a hard time believing they could have developped anything remotely functionning. Anyway, if you have sources about specific programs being dismantled, please post them.

      If true, Gaddafi's redemption is also an ONGOING event. Considering this administration catastrophic failure in anything related to foreign policy (Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, North Korea...), if they had a real success story, they'd be dwelling over it.

      The Iran - Iraq war ended in 1988, 15 years before the invasion of Iraq.

      Libya is one fifth the size of Iraq (in population) and has no significant military. Rummy's Theory of Modern Warfare states that it could be invaded by 30,000 troops. No need for complex logistics. As for the efficience of the Iraqi buffer against Iran, I'll let you elaborate on that.

      I don't have much info on Libya's compliance with the UN, since nobody writes on them. What I know, though, is that the general feeling of UN inspectors over Iraq (remember Hans Blix and Mohammed El Baradei?) was that, if far from perfect, Iraq's collaboration was sufficient to ascertain that their WMD programs were effectively off. Of course, they were sharply criticized by the US media and administration. But they were right and the administration was wrong.

      --

      It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
    6. Re:Really? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Crapload of chemical weapons? Libya had an aging chemical weapon program with nothing to show but precursors and aging mustard gas.

      Troops next door? What difference does that make? We have lots of troops next door to canada, does that justify an invasion?

      I dont think the GP is being naive, Ithink you are. This is how politics works. The Bush administration needed a high-profile "win" on the waro n terror. Quadaffi saw the opportunity and took it. The west got its oil and Libya is now open for business. While this is a good opportunity for libya it doesnt make the world safer and shows the rest of the world that if yorue oil-rich you can cash out at anytime and be forgiven for many terrorist acts.

      Also the claim of iraq selling as much as it could pump out is untrue. Under oil-for-food its ability to sell was limited.

    7. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dad worked in Libya last year and he told me a story that he only ever heard inside Libya. Basically Gadaffi got word that there was an Al-Qaeda training camp on the border with Chad; Gadaffi did not like this at all. So he sent down some troops in a couple of transport planes and rounded them up; his planes then flew over the Sahara desert and his troops kicked the terrorists out of the plane one at a time while circling over the desert. So I think the guy is trying to make a few decent changes.

    8. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's his son now who is doing day to day management of things and who is a a moderate (comparing only to other tin horn dictators in the region) and was university educated in the West. He is mostly responsible for getting his father to turn over Libya's WMD programs. Any progress that has been made can be traced back to the son, and not the aging Gaddafi (however it's spelled).

    9. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > At least, he's not a terrorist, is he? Well, it's been proved that Lybia has destroyed at least 2 airliners.

      Yunno, that's a crime, yes, but the anti-libya lobby in the UK is sounding like the fucking cuban exiles in the US now. Millions of people in the country are still going to bear collective punishment because of these angry twisted fuckwads driving all policy with a single vendetta. Yeah I'd want revenge too, but thankfully for the rest of us I don't get to run countries and their citizens into the ground that way.

      > In exchange, US/UK got 1. drilling rights for Lybian oil,

      This "Lybia" must be quite a place. Libya has virtually no oil.

    10. Re:Really? by aevans · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the families won't be embarrassed to get anything near $1 million. Maybe split between them.

  39. Re:how much more food will we have to send in aid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares? Waitrose Deliver

  40. They are not THAT robust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure a catapult would break them.

    1. Re:They are not THAT robust by AliasN · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure everyone already knew that.

  41. It's damn good idea by jackharrer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have you thought how good idea it is? They have cash (oil) but it's pointless to just give it to people. But if you give computers to kids in 10 years time you'll have a lot very skilled computer scientists. And for quite cheap wage. Think how many western companies will try to invest in country like that. And it's much closer that India.
    Question is: Are those kids going to learn something or just ignore those computers? Thing is that there're not many things to play with in Libya. Of course if you don't count sand.
    That creates very intresting experiment. You have a lot of kids who have nothing to do except playing with computers. Almost 24/7. And they have friends who do the same... What kind of outcome we can get?

    I personally think that Qudaffi is not stupid. That's a great investment in future. And great chance - where else can you buy valuable education for $100? If I'm right, we will see many other contries to follow the suit.

    --

    "an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often, quite often, picturesque liar" - Mark Twain
  42. cost per day of Iraq fiasco by bstadil · · Score: 1

    Before this nonsense in Iraq is over we could alternatively have bought a laptop to every single person on the globe. Assume 5 million kids enters school per year in the US. At $100/ laptop we could give each a computer for what the what the war cost PER DAY

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:cost per day of Iraq fiasco by enrevanche · · Score: 1
      Yes but how would that help the poor oil companies? And Halliburton continues to need corporate welfare or the whole U.S. economy will falter.

      Foreign aid is best paid out in weapons.

      Damn socialist.

  43. Somebody tell me what to think by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Ok, is Gaddafi a good guy or a bad guy?

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  44. I too want to challenge your perception by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 1

    From a stand point of citizen of highly developed European country, Africa looks like, as you said it, a some dust bowl or rain forests full of poisonous monkeys. That is not meant as an offence, but just as an fact.

    If you want to make some comparisons, look on Europe, the largest industrial and urban area in the world. There is huge transport infrastructure that connects cities and metropolises together with motorways, railways, air- and sea routes. Most of the population live in large cities and other urban areas. There are large industries from steel and petrochemicals to high tech manufacturing. What there isn't in Europe is wild nature, most of the land in western Europe is in farming use and in north Europe where there are more forest, they are mainly meant for the pulp and paper industries.

    The thing in Europe is that geographically it is a very small place with highly packed population and infrastructure. The thing in Africa is that it's just huge continent, with not highly packed population and with almost no infrastructure. That's a fact. And that fact won't change any time soon. Even if the whole continent would get it's things together and make what China did, it would still take from 50 - 100 years before Africa would have gained the developed countries. And just to remember it, the infrastructure that has been build, the governing culture and etc.. have been in works for hundreds of years, and generations after another have build on works of previous generations. That can't be just replicated in a matter of years or decades.

    I also can understand that it may seem unethical of west to hold on patents of medicine and not sell them cheaply in undeveloped countries, but there is a reason for it. If the pharmaceutical companies would sell medicines to undeveloped countries with lowered prices, it would A) cause uproar in population of developed countries that have to buy the same medication with higher prices and B) it would certainly cause illegal trafficking of cheap medicine from undeveloped countries to developed countries. Even in the B scenario is happening, in example pharmaceutical companies sell their drugs little bit cheaper to Greece which has a lower standard of living, and from there some buyers from other EU countries buy them and transport them to their countries selling them with a bit lower price. If this same would happen in a global scale, with bigger price differences, the pharmaceutical would have a very big problem and development of new medicines would come to a halt. The current situation may seem unfair, but at least new drugs are developed actively and every year patents of many drugs expire, that undeveloped countries can use freely.

    I also do think that information and having access to it is important in undeveloped countries. I thought do feel that it won't solve the basic problems there is, which basically are lack of transportation and production infrastructure. You do not have any value with information if you can't use it. So yes, shipping computers to African children and government employees is good, but even better would be if in the developed countries would open our markets to African agricultural products, and many undeveloped nations would understand that having import taxes to high tech and production utilities is not a good thing, then we really could get some results. Sorry too for ranting, but I just wanted to remind of the facts.

  45. Is this a wind up? by gjuk · · Score: 1

    (sorry)

  46. Reagan knew how to negotiate by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

    Here's how you negotiate with terror sponsors: "The Soviet Union responded to the [April 14, 1986] raid by canceling scheduled talks between Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze and Secretary of State George Shultz that were intended to formalize plans for a summit meeting between Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, who promised Gaddafi that the USSR would help Libya strengthen its military defenses. But Gaddafi, described by Reagan as the "mad dog of the Middle East," was strangely subdued in the aftermath of the raid. According to Secretary Shultz, the administration's leading proponent of strong action against Libya, Gaddafi "retreated into the desert." An Arab diplomat told Donald Gregg, national security adviser to Vice-President George Bush, that when Gaddafi was seen "carrying the body of his dead child out of the wreckage, he lost all stature because it as shown that he couldn't protect his family." For whatever reason, Gaddafi acted with uncharacteristic restraint in the years that followed. According to a 1989 Department of State Bulletin, while terrorist activity continued on the rise in 1987 and 1988, Libyan-sponsored terrorist acts declined significantly."

    --
    I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
  47. Rather... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An Internet ready computer that can't be used for wanking while typing. Which is possibly the best thing that's ever happened for IRC users everywhere.

  48. Mod parent down -20 for speling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent down -20 for speling.

    It's Libya you douchebag.

    1. Re:Mod parent down -20 for speling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dybua thinks not.

  49. I'll get me coat... by geekthink · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, computer winds YOU up!

  50. The real question is by Brunellus · · Score: 1

    Exactly what SORT of connectivity are we thinking about here? It's all well and good for Libyan kids to have crankbooks, but what are they going to access? Is it really a good thing if Libyan schoolkids can do nothing more but read illustrated passages of Gadafi's Green Book?

    The Libyan regime continues to be repressive and illiberal; the simple addition of a few handcrank laptops will in itself do nothing to change that. I know it's not popular to say this on /., but technology does not solve all problems. It's silly to believe that all you have to do is add technology and stir, and suddenly modern liberal democracy will happen, complete with vapid suburban kids expressing themselves freely on Myspace. Technologically advanced societies can be oppressive, too: Nazi Germany was a technologically advanced society that used all of the tools at its disposal--engineering, chemistry, information technology--for the brutal repression of its people. The USSR did the same.

    I, for one, hope that Libya is opening itself up and becoming a free society. But I'm not holding my breath.

  51. Linux variety? by theGil · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know which variety of Linux these machines run? All I can seem to find is the term "Linux-based."

    1. Re:Linux variety? by Aqws · · Score: 1

      Some Red Hat varient, they do have a nice website. Their wiki has lots of information.

  52. 1.2 million python programmers in the making by codepunk · · Score: 1

    A good majority of the stuff running on it is python based....looks like we could have
    some more coders joining the ranks before long.

    --


    Got Code?
  53. Libyan ISP by Chocky2 · · Score: 1

    Slightly OT (very heartily approve of the wind-up laptops though) but a few years ago (maybe about 7 or 8 I guess) I was on a training course at Sun with some unix sysadmins from Libya's only ISP -- if memory serves they were a major and two lieutenants.

    Although there are now several commercial ISPs operating in the country I believe they're all still heavily monitored by the military. Providing ready access to the Internet for all your nation's school children is highly empowering -- potentially a very positive sign for future liberalisation of their communications.

  54. How much time by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    ...before you see these on eBay? I bet that many of us would pay more than $100 just to toy with it. That will create a demand for the product and will make the price go high.
    If the kids don't sell them themselves, then bigger kids will take them off their hands to sell them.

    I don't know exactly what USD $100 represent in Lybia but must be a lot of money for a kid, anywhere.

    Sad, isn't it? Well, don't buy one of these when they hit eBay.

    1. Re:How much time by The+Raven · · Score: 1

      I think you're wrong. Why not sell this to everyone for $100... the higher their volume, the farther down they can drive incremental costs via bulk purchasing and production streamlining. Why can't I buy one for my poor neighbor? Are they doing racial profiling, and whites aren't allowed to buy them? I know that hikers would kill for a cheap, durable computer that doesn't rely on a plug.

      And while I understand that the long term benefits of knowledge are worth more than $100... if a poor family wants to make $100 selling their computer so they don't starve, are you gonna tell me that they should suck it up and die rather than sell their cheap computer?

      Frankly, your disconnect with reality is rather disconcerting. Life isn't as neat and tidy as you'd like it to be. This computer-for-every-kid idea is great, and millions will benefit from it. But a significant percentage of those kids will sell it to survive, graft and corruption will waste more, and a perfectly homogenous network of computers like that is probably gonna get hit with some nasty malware.

      Life isn't always pretty.

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
  55. OWLPC by rm-R-winnt · · Score: 1

    Where, oh where is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation?!? If they were really innovative, they would have already announced the OWLPC* program by now. Of course, this would have to be followed up with the OAASRSLPC** program.

    *OWLPC: One Windows License Per Child **OAASRSLPC: One Anti-virus, Adware-removal, Spybot-removal, Rootkit-removal Software License Per Child

  56. Rejected by whom? by Flying+pig · · Score: 1
    Given a choice between a study posted by the Lancet, a medical journal with a reputation and a long term business to protect (which has lasted for many years), and a "rejection" by any politician or government whatsoever, especially ones who only have to stay in office a year or so longer, I'm afraid I know what I would believe.

    Why do we have NGOs and independent monitoring bodies? Because we know how much we can trust governments.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
  57. Wireless Mesh Networking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most likely he just wants to be able to communicate with his troops when the US takes out his fixed assets

  58. The USA should fix it's own problems first. by FatSean · · Score: 1

    We can't even have a non-controversial election but we're gonna destroy IRaq's infrastructure and tell them how to run their government? No wonder it is such a failure.

    Cue the conservatives crying that no 'good news' ever makes it out of Iraq into US Media. What good news? That the juice is only on 4 hours a day still...when Saddam kept it on 24/7? That MORE people are being murdered now than at the height of Saddam's killings? Oh boy, did you clods build a school! Hooray! That makes 25% of the schools destroyed repaired. You'll get your fucking news story when you rebuild everything you blew up.

    Meh.

    --
    Blar.
  59. Muammar vs. Saddam (was "Terrorists") by mi · · Score: 1
    For many, many years Muammar Gaddafi was seen as the ultimate bad guy, worse even than Saddam Hussain.

    Although pressured for a years, Gaddafi only gave up on December 19, 2003 after seeing pictures of Saddam Hussein pulled out of his rathole by US troops on December 13, 2003. Correlation is not always the sign of causation, of course, but you just can not brush this one off as a mere "coincidence"...

    If Iraq is a classic example of 'how not to do regime change' then Lybia is a classic example of 'how to do it right'.

    False dichotomy... Enticing carrots require credibly threatening sticks to be effective... Bush's treatment of Saddam's regime (what Clinton should have done years earlier) put that credibility back into our threats.

    Liberia's Charles Taylor is another example of how useful that credibility was, until undermined by setbacks in Iraq and anti-American backlash world-wide.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  60. Re:sounds evil to me.. by AliasN · · Score: 1

    If you reply to flamebait, then the terrorists win!

  61. And oil proof? by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    Either way, I think "Libya Purchases ... Wind-up Laptops"
    wins the "Best Headline of the Month" award.

  62. Spelling police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, maybe this will help some of you:

    The country is LIBYA, not Lybia.
    The people are LIBYANS, not Lybians, Libyians, or anything else you idiots keep thinking up.

    And in case you have been turning a blind eye to the horrors (HORRORS, I say) that have been going on, here is the tip of the iceberg:
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=200341&cid=164 06413
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=200341&cid=164 06309
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=200341&cid=164 06149

    1. Re:Spelling police by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "You say LIB-E-YA, I say LABIA, let's call the whole thing off!"

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  63. The project slogan is rumored to be... by tinkerton · · Score: 1

    "Yank your Crank"

  64. first bring them AIDS and then laptops by chifut · · Score: 1

    First he brought AIDS to hundreds of children through the bad conditions in hospitals,

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDS_scandal_in_Libya /

    now he's buying laptops to those children..

    Great work!

  65. Nice idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that the President of the United States would not spend a single U.S. dollar for American children, I would say this is a very nice thing. Of course whats a U.S. president to do when he needs gun, bombs and dumb people that will fight his wars for him? Educated people are not going to go over there to die for him.

  66. Re:Be very careful people... by Shanep · · Score: 1

    Don't criticize this! It would be like criticising THE Church! And that could get you lightning bolts up your arse!

    What ignoramus marked this as Troll?

    You are obviously not aware that Nicholas Negroponte himself, of OLPC, claimed that, "I don't respond to such criticism. Because criticising this project is like criticising the church, or the Red Cross.".

    http://www.olpcnews.com/people/negroponte/negropon te_to_critic.html
    http://www.vanguardngr.com/articles/2002/features/ technology/tec314092006.html

    If you are ignorant, don't moderate.

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  67. "Freedom" and "democracy" by kbahey · · Score: 1

    The irony of it all is that the US claims that it is invading countries to spread "freedom" and "democracy", for the betterment of the local population.

    The case of Libya proves that this is just hypocrisy, since the population of Libya has not been more free nor more democratic when Gaddafi gave up and relented his hardline. There are still no elections, and the Green Book quasi-ideology is still in effect, not liberal democracy.

    Gaddafi's son is presented as a young and progressive voice and slated to take over from dad. Very little has changes since Gaddafi Sr came to power 1969 as a young army lieutenant.

    Western companies rushed in to establish offices for oil drilling, supplying goods, ...etc.

    The only benefit is that the chaos of Iraq with the bombing and sectarian strife is not happening. But this is like a person who has a failing hart being thankful he does not have cancer ...

    The message here is: mercantilism and corporatism drives this, and US/UK say it is driven by morals, yet in actuality, the average Libyan people be damned.