Slashdot Mirror


Wii Virtual Console, Launch Titles Finalized

For gamers anticipating the 19th of this month, you have a lot to look forward to. The virtual console launch titles and Wii launch window games have been finalized. A full 32 Wii games will be available within five weeks of the console's launch, and fans will be able to buy 30 classic Nintendo, Genesis, and TurboGrafx titles by the end of the year. Even with a disappointing showing for classic SNES titles (no Link to the Past outside of Japan) the virtual console list should make every gamer, Wii fan or no, smile. From the list: "NES Games (500 Wii Points) - Mario Bros., The Legend of Zelda, Donkey Kong, Donkey Kong Jr., Ice Hockey, Pinball, Soccer, Tennis, Urban Champion, Wario's Woods, Baseball, Solomon's Key." I haven't owned a NES in quite a while, so I'm really happy to see the likes of Ice Hockey making a comeback. Wow ... got in so many fights with my brother over that game.

159 comments

  1. No Zelda 3?... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    ... BAD! Well, except that they're almost certainly holding it back to give everyone time to finish Twilight Princess. They'll sell more that way.

    Of the launch titles: OK, I call Twilight Princess, maybe Excitetruck, Wii Play (mainly for Duck Hunt 2 and the extra wiimote), Budokai Tenkaichi 2, Red Steel. Actually, cancel that. Just Twilight Princess. I'll look into buying another game some time around, oh... probably April.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    1. Re:No Zelda 3?... by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      Where do you see a game called Wii Play with Duck Hunt an extra wiimote? Do you mean Wii Sports? That's the only game on the list with the word "Wii" in it, but it doesn't come with Duck Hunt, and it comes with the console, not a controller. Well, I guess the controller's included to, but not an extra one.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    2. Re:No Zelda 3?... by revlayle · · Score: 1

      Australians (and Japanese also, IIRC) get a title called Wii Play that you can get "free" when you buy an additional Wii Remote. Wii Play has a series of simple Wii Remote played games similar to Wii Sports, but are not necessarily sports games. One of the mini games is a game VERY *VERY* MUCH like Duck Hunt.

      Weather or not this title is available at launch or with a Wii Remote in the US or Europe is unknown (especially to me!).

    3. Re:No Zelda 3?... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      What?? no Honey Peach?

      Bah, it only shows that the Wii is not an "adult" console...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    4. Re:No Zelda 3?... by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      Nope, Wii Play will be out next year. It's a collection of shooting / mini games. Personally, I think it would have been a much better pack in than Wii Sports (seeing that the only game on Wii Sports that is appealing to me is bowling), but I'll take what I can get.

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    5. Re:No Zelda 3?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to think, I've really been wanting Goldeneye 64. (Not to mention orig. Super Smash Bros, Zelda LttP (and maybe Ocarina), Super Mario World, and a dozen or so other SNES games. At least I feel a little better, given that while I've missed the pre-order window, half of the stuff I want won't be out till next year. Besides, after a summer of nothingness, good things are happening to the PC again.

    6. Re:No Zelda 3?... by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      And to think, I've really been wanting Goldeneye 64.

      Trust me, you probably don't want Goldeneye 64. There are some games that have aged very well (mainly because the Genre has not improved that much since they were released) like Banjo Kazooie and The Legend of Zelda: OoT, but Goldeneye 64 (and Perfect Dark) really show their age.

    7. Re:No Zelda 3?... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Goldeneye is impossible. How would Nintendo now rerelease a game made by a company owned by Microsoft on a license owned by EA?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    8. Re:No Zelda 3?... by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 1

      Wii Play is out in Europe at launch, December 8th.

      And just to clarify, it's the remote that comes with the game, not the other way around. Otherwise people buying 3 more controllers would get 3 copies of the game.

    9. Re:No Zelda 3?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AHH, makes sense!

      -- revlayle

    10. Re:No Zelda 3?... by The+Great+Pulgoso · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I must say that I found Wii Play considerably underwhelming, at least for the 3 modes that I played with (laser puck hockey, billiards and Shooting range). I must say that if it's between Wii Sports and Wii Play, I would choose Wii sports, especially for the Tennis component of Sports (best girlfriend game, period).

    11. Re:No Zelda 3?... by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      The tennis game sucks, though. You don't control the movement of the character, only the swinging of the racket. And even then, all you have to do is flick your wrist for a power strike.

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  2. Can't wait for more! by Deluxe_247 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It looks like Nintendo is taking a page right from Microsoft in their online approach, and due to their huge history of games on their past consoles they are likely to have an even higher revenue stream from 'classic' game sales.

    FTFA: "Nintendo reportedly plans to make ten new games available every month, so retro fans may want to set aside a budget -- if future releases can uphold this level of quality, all those Wii games may become almost a secondary consideration."

    10 Every month?? That's pretty aggressive - but then again how many games have they produced for NES, SNES, 64, etc? A few thousand im sure. I'll be waiting for some of the gems (and would even be willing to pay a premium!) such as Metroid, Kid Icarus, Ikari Warriors/Contra(Online Co-op perhaps??) and the like.

    Microsoft really had an amazing strategy with their online classic game downloads, but it looks like Nintendo is going to take it to the next level - and I for one will happily shell out a wii amount of cash for their golden oldies.

    --
    Its Deluxe, son. Deluxe!
    1. Re:Can't wait for more! by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Interesting
      10 Every month?? That's pretty aggressive - but then again how many games have they produced for NES, SNES, 64, etc? A few thousand im sure.

      Remember, it needn't be only Nintendo games either. Go to third parties and say to them 'how would you like some free money?' They'll put their back catalogues up for download, no problem, because it costs them nothing to do it and they stand to get some money.

      At a rate of ten a month, Nintendo will probably run out of NES, SNES and N64 ROMs some time around, oh... 2060. Assuming they only put up games that were actually worth playing, there'll still be enough to last the reasonable lifetime of the Wii.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Can't wait for more! by PhunWithPhysics · · Score: 1

      "It looks like Nintendo is taking a page right from Microsoft in their online approach, and due to their huge history of games on their past consoles they are likely to have an even higher revenue stream from 'classic' game sales."

      Nintendo stated that they were going to have a virtual console when Microsoft resisted the idea. It was only after Nintendo announced it that Microsoft warmed up to the idea.

    3. Re:Can't wait for more! by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Microsoft really had an amazing strategy with their online classic game downloads, but it looks like Nintendo is going to take it to the next level - and I for one will happily shell out a wii amount of cash for their golden oldies.

      Will it be possible to download an old game for free if you already have the physical cartridge?

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    4. Re:Can't wait for more! by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      No, it will not.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    5. Re:Can't wait for more! by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Remember, it needn't be only Nintendo games either.


      In fact, I think a few of the Genesis launch titles aren't by Nintendo ;)
      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    6. Re:Can't wait for more! by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Assuming they only put up games that were actually worth playing

      I've got Tennis and Baseball for free via Animal Crossing. Maybe they're worth playing for free for a few minutes now and then, but I can't say I'd pay $5 each for them. In fact, I can emphatically say that I wouldn't. Especially with Wii Sports right there.

      Yeah, yeah, nostalgia - but there are games on that list that are actually worth playing through in addition to reminding you of your childhood (aside from the obvious ones, I also have Wario's Woods via AC and if I suddenly couldn't have it there anymore I'd shell out $5 in an instant for it). And those aren't two of them.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    7. Re:Can't wait for more! by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Will it be possible to download an old game for free if you already have the physical cartridge?

      No. Too easy to fake. Unless there was a system where you traded in your cartridge for the equivalent in Wii points - which wouldn't work, since there's no profit in it for Nintendo, and if anyone wants my gold NES Legend Of Zelda cartridge the phrase 'cold dead hands' will become significant to them.

      I'm wondering how long it is before this is hacked, myself. Many, many people have gigabytes of roms from the long years of PC emulation. Set up a wireless router to spoof addresses so that Wii thinks it's connected to Nintendo when actually it's connected to your PC, and feed the thing your old downloaded roms. I'd guess Nintendo are doing some kind of crypto signing to prevent this attack, though.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:Can't wait for more! by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      I only got to see the Virtual Console list after I'd posted; page wasn't loading for a while there. Original Megadrive games on the new Nintendo machine. Wow. If you'd told me back in 1992 that someday I'd sit down to play Sonic The Hedgehog on the new Nintendo console, I'd have laughed in your face...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    9. Re:Can't wait for more! by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Exactly when did that happen? The Xbox Live Arcade started with the Xbox 1 in November of 2004. It only had about 30 games total. Unless Nintendo was boasting about the virtual console over 2 years ago before they even announced the Wii, I highly doubt MS got the idea from them.

    10. Re:Can't wait for more! by Hitto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While the philosophical "because I can" approach might be interesting, why bother? I'm getting a Wii, but I already have a controller-to-usb adapter so I can play roms on my PC.

      I bought Mario and Zelda for the GBA when the whole NES classics line was released - even though it was easier to just use a flashcart, just out of respect, but Nintendo hadn't even thought of adding anything new in them, which, for Mario, was a HUGE disappointment - They'd already released a deluxe edition for the Gameboy Color that allowed a simultaneous-two-player coop mode, while the GBA port had the same old "when I die, it's your turn to play" shit.

      I will wait before buying those legal roms to see if they're anything more or better than what I can get for free. Moreso, have you seen the zillions of nes rom hacks? How will the Virtual Console rival with that?

    11. Re:Can't wait for more! by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Of course those of us with a GameCube have already been able to play the original Sonic games for quite some time. I got it out of the $18 bin at walmart (came with 6? sonic games). I Want to know how much these games will actually cost in dollars? how many points do I get for $1?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    12. Re:Can't wait for more! by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1
      I've got Tennis and Baseball for free via Animal Crossing. Maybe they're worth playing for free for a few minutes now and then, but I can't say I'd pay $5 each for them. In fact, I can emphatically say that I wouldn't. Especially with Wii Sports right there.
      Someone will buy them, even if it's not you. Since it will cost them so little to sell them, it's worth it for them if only 10 people buy them. Also, saying they have 30 games available sounds better than having 5, even if it's the best 5 games ever made, and the only 5 that 90% of people would buy anyways, and it will attract more people to know they have variety. So, good for them. Of course, I still have my NES and I'm getting Twillight Princess for Gamecube, so I really don't care.
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    13. Re:Can't wait for more! by typobox43 · · Score: 1

      In the US, 1 point = 1 cent. Price necessarily varies in other regions due to currency differences.

    14. Re:Can't wait for more! by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I live in Canada, So I have to assume it will be the same. They couldn't have 2 cents per point, because that would be too expensive. They wouldn't do 1.2 cents or something like that, because it would be too confusing to the people. iTunes cost 99 cents in Canada, so i imagine that Nintendo would do the same thing to avoid confusion.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    15. Re:Can't wait for more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With so many games coming out so fast, one has to assume their direct ports. I wonder if any of the games would have online play? Also can the Wii do any voice over IP? I haven't seen anything about microphones or anything else tied to online play?

    16. Re:Can't wait for more! by revlayle · · Score: 1

      In Japan 1 Point = 1 Yen. 1 Yen != 1 US Cent. Exchange rates are probably a *factor*, but certainly not the final say on how much a Wii Points card would cost (I wouldn't be surprised if a Canadian 2000 point card costs around $24-$25 CAD).

    17. Re:Can't wait for more! by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm pretty sure that in Canada that 1 point will be 1 cent then. According to XE.com, 1 Yen = 0.00856575 $US. 1 Canadian penny is worth 0.00885100 $US. Those numbers are both pretty much the same. About .8 cents. I don't think they want to have people dealing with fractions of a penny, just as they won't want people dealing with fractions of a Yen. Also, as i've mentioned, iTunes sell for 99 cents in canada, same price as they are in the states. It's not a question of cost at this point, but rather what people think is a good price. So a 2000 point card would cost $20 + Tax. I live in Ontario, so that comes to $22.80

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    18. Re:Can't wait for more! by Scoth · · Score: 1

      My guess is the rom hack community is a teeny fraction of even the emulation community. Even my fiancee was playing Sonics and Marios with an emulator when I met her, but she'd never heard of rom hacks. I recently got Mario Adventure working (Awesomest hack ever, see Here for it. Total conversion of SMB3.).

      That said, Nintendo could probably make a killing if they contracted and/or somehow got the best of the rom hacks onto the Virtual Console. Imagine being able to not only advertise classic games, but new versions of classic games. I don't guess there's much chance of that happening though, since they're fighting tooth and nail to kill the emulation scene.

    19. Re:Can't wait for more! by typobox43 · · Score: 1

      (To GP: You're right, I worded that poorly.) Anyway, I'm pretty sure that I saw that Canadian points will be $24 for a 2000 point card, or 1.2 cents per point. Fractions of a penny aren't an issue, since I doubt you'll be able to buy a single point - the lowest denomination of cards that I've heard anything about is 2000. All of the Virtual Console game prices are multiples of 100. If you can buy points with a credit card directly through the console, I wouldn't be surprised if you have to buy them by the hundred.

    20. Re:Can't wait for more! by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      2000 point cards will be sold for $20 in the US. This implies that US points and Japanese points do not have the same value.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    21. Re:Can't wait for more! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Moreso, have you seen the zillions of nes rom hacks? How will the Virtual Console rival with that?

      Why would it want to? I don't think there's all that many gamers out there clamoring to play rom hack masterpieces like "SUPER NAKED BROS." or "MEGAFAG II".

    22. Re:Can't wait for more! by Fonce · · Score: 1

      Well, what if I like nude, hairy, Italian plumbers and am hot for a gay MegaMan, you insensitive clod?!

      Keep your imaginary character gay-bashing to yourself. Now, where's my 'trance vibrator'?

      --
      If all my base are belong to you and I attempt to retrieve my base, does that mean I'm freebasing?
    23. Re:Can't wait for more! by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I know, I know. I'm just saying - they're obviously not limiting themselves to the games that are "worth playing." Which means they have an even HUGER library to choose from.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  3. The only lauch title by joshsnow · · Score: 1

    The only launch title that would make me buy a console is Duke Nukem 4Ever. Sadly, console launch and DNF seem to be mutually exclusive.

    1. Re:The only lauch title by dlc3007 · · Score: 1

      umm... you're assuming that DNF will launch at all. Clearly, this is not the console's fault. ;)

    2. Re:The only lauch title by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about?

      Duke Nukem Forever is the star title for the hot phantom game console.

    3. Re:The only lauch title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol! Wow! What an interesting and hilarious comment! Thanks for urinating on the plot of land where the dead horses body used to be

    4. Re:The only lauch title by DorkusMasterus · · Score: 1

      DNF being released and Reality are mutually exclusive, actually.

  4. classics for casual gamers! by palad1 · · Score: 1

    That's great, I'll be able to play Mario bros with my friends, and deal some Rampage love in the neighborhood. All these games were available on Mame, but the form factor of the Wii really makes it great for casual gamers.

    1. Re:classics for casual gamers! by DingerX · · Score: 1

      Bah? No Military Madness/Nectaris? Screw it Nintendo, you just lost yourself a customer!
      wha?
      You JUST LOST YOURSELF A CUSTOMER!

    2. Re:classics for casual gamers! by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      Who said there wouldn't be any Military Madness? At 10 games per month, I think that leaves plenty of room for Military Madness.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    3. Re:classics for casual gamers! by DudemanX · · Score: 1

      I hope to see Military Madness show up soon too. At least we're getting Dungeon Explorer. For those who never played it, it is a very fun multiplayer co-op with gameplay very reminiscent of Gauntlet only with more RPG elements to it like Zelda. I recommend everyone try it.

  5. Oh No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you didn't get Zelda III for the SNES, GBA or GameCube on the Collector's Disc you obviously didn't want it that badly.

    1. Re:Oh No! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "for the SNES, GBA or GameCube on the Collector's Disc"

      No Zelda games that appeared on a Game Boy platform were on the collector's disk, including LttP, since they were trying to sell that cartridge at the same time as the collector's disk.

      Still, didn't everybody get that one if for no other reason than Four Swords?

    2. Re:Oh No! by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1
      No Zelda games that appeared on a Game Boy platform were on the collector's disk, including LttP, since they were trying to sell that cartridge at the same time as the collector's disk.
      Zelda 1 & 2 appeared on both the Game Boy and the collector's Disk.
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    3. Re:Oh No! by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      Zelda 1 & 2 came after the Collectors disk promotion ended.

  6. A few titles I didn't expect. by hal2814 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really expected the first few titles to all be super-popular titles everyone has played. Then I saw Solomon's Key. Sometimes I've wondered if I'm the only person who has ever played that game. It isn't fantastic but it's very good. I'm glad it will have the chance to get a little more much-deserved exposure. And when I saw Mario Bros I was preparing to lambaste the article post on not differentiating between Mario Bros and Super Mario Bros but the article got it right. It IS Mario Bros. That is so cool. I've always been a fan of it and its derivatives (especially Mario Clash on the Virtual Boy).

    It is a shame that they're almost certainly using the NES version of Donkey Kong without all the levels and that Super Mario World and Zelda Link to the Past aren't available at launch but I'm sure they won't be far behind.

    1. Re:A few titles I didn't expect. by nickos · · Score: 1
      Then I saw Solomon's Key. Sometimes I've wondered if I'm the only person who has ever played that game. It isn't fantastic but it's very good. I'm glad it will have the chance to get a little more much-deserved exposure.


      Don't worry, you're not the only one - I used to love that game back on my rubber keyed Spectrum! Classic! :)
    2. Re:A few titles I didn't expect. by revlayle · · Score: 1

      Like the previous reply you got... I, also, have played this many times, in actual cartridge form on an NES and on an emulator.... many of my friends have also. It's a great game and a decent choice for the VC.

    3. Re:A few titles I didn't expect. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Mario Bros. despite it's classic appeal isn't much fun as far as I'm concerned. There's a lot of games that would draw a lot more sales. It definitely isn't worth the same price as The Legend Of Zelda. I think they need to rethink their pricing on the virtual console. It seems to me like all games from the same console will be the same price. This is the iTunes approach that I don't like. There's many games on Nintendo that aren't worth the same as the must have titles, but that I'd still buy if I could get them at a cheaper price. With iTunes, There's a ton of songs I won't buy because I don't think they're worth a dollar, but I would definitely buy them for 25 cents.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:A few titles I didn't expect. by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      "There's a lot of games that would draw a lot more sales."

      That is the point I'm trying to make. Nintendo isn't just going down a list of top prospective sellers. They're putting in some games that may not appeal to everyone. They're actually going trotting out some games with niche-only appeal. I'm sorry you don't think Mario Brothers is fun but I rather enjoy it and am glad it will be coming to the Wii.

      I do agree that it way not be worth the same price as Legend of Zelda though but I imagine Nintendo will only further tier the pricing when they feel they absolutely must.

    5. Re:A few titles I didn't expect. by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      My two cents:

      Mario Bros: Boring

      Super Mario All-Stars SMB3 Battle Game with up-to-4-player online play, multiple maps, and an option to remove coins: Virtual Console Gold

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    6. Re:A few titles I didn't expect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine this is the first pass and that they'll tweak the prices on certain titles as they get a feel for what the market will bear. If there's a title in the library that isn't selling well for 500 points, they will probably try a "Special offer: now just 400 points!" to try to find the optimal cost for that title.

    7. Re:A few titles I didn't expect. by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Mario Brothers has a fun two-player mode. One player mode by modern standards is "meh", which actually still constitutes holding up pretty well as most games from that era are "crap", but still not something I'd go out of my way for.

      The Nintendo's hardware is pretty simplistic and IMHO few games for it really hold up very well on nostalgia alone. However, when you add "playing against a human" back into the mix, that changes. Another example is Dr. Mario, which my wife enjoys because it's the only game she can consistently beat me with. Two player fun, one player boring.

      Despite having played games since the Intellivision and having as much nostalgia for it as the next guy, I find the earliest console that has a number of games I actually want to play is the Super Nintendo, and to a lesser extent, the Genesis. Only one Intellivision game has held up for me ("Tron Deadly Discs", I have a weak spot for games that allow movement and firing in arbitrary directions, like Robotron 2084 or Smash TV), and only a handful of Nintendo-era games have held up for me, most of them decently remade on later consoles.

  7. I want Tetris! by eric_brissette · · Score: 1

    Bomberman will have to do until Tetris makes the list. I've never played the TurboGrafx 16 version, but I assume it's the same idea.

    1. Re:I want Tetris! by nickos · · Score: 1

      The TurboGrafx (PC Engine in Japan) was the original platform for Bomberman (it was written by Hudsonsoft), so yes it's very much the same idea.

    2. Re:I want Tetris! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way. The NES title (which was itself a port from older MSX/Spectrum versions) came out in 1985, well before PC Engine's launch in 1987.

    3. Re:I want Tetris! by Nimrangul · · Score: 1

      Tetris is under the thumb of Microsoft, I find it unlikely that it will ever be available with Nintendo again.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    4. Re:I want Tetris! by nickos · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have said "home" platform - the PC Engine/TurboGrafx was co-developed by Hudson Soft and NEC...

    5. Re:I want Tetris! by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      How do you figure this? Nintendo just came out with a new Tetris game for the DS earlier this year. And Nintendo can most definitely release their versions of Tetris and Tetris Attack on the virtual console...

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    6. Re:I want Tetris! by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      The Tetris game card in my DS is just an illusion, then? Please, share exactly how it is that you find it unlikely :)

    7. Re:I want Tetris! by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      I dunno if the Tetris games can go on the virtual console without sorting out some licensing issues first. I wouldn't take it for granted.

      Worst case scenario, they could rename Tetris Attack to its Japanese name, Panel de Pon, or release Pokemon Puzzle League instead.

      Wouldn't mind an pre-infinite rotation version of Tetris on the VC though.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    8. Re:I want Tetris! by Kimos · · Score: 1
      Tetris is under the thumb of Microsoft, I find it unlikely that it will ever be available with Nintendo again.
      That's the scariest thing I've heard all day. Someone care to elaborate on that?
    9. Re:I want Tetris! by revlayle · · Score: 1

      Total FUD IMNSHO, the last non-Nintendo Tetris game I recalled was Tetris Worlds (by THQ). The game WAS for the XBox.... and PS2, and GameCube, AAND GBA.... AAAAND PC.

    10. Re:I want Tetris! by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      IMO the GBC Tetris was by far the best, and I don't think the Virtual Console will be getting that any time soon...

    11. Re:I want Tetris! by Nimrangul · · Score: 1

      I was running under outdated information, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexey_Pazhitnov, Wikipedia let me know that since the last I heard of Tetris' control, Alexey Pazhitnov, the owner of all rights to Tetris, has left Microsoft. So I guess it is back in the air.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
  8. Can someone post the list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would someone be so kind as to post the list here for those of us who trapped behind the wall of websense?

    1. Re:Can someone post the list? by Ninjaesque+One · · Score: 0

      The list, posted here verbatim:

      NES Games (500 Wii Points)
      * Mario Bros.: Mario and Luigi punch turtles. * The Legend of Zelda: The original Hyrulean adventure. * Donkey Kong: The game that put Nintendo on the map. * Donkey Kong Jr.: Not quite a classic, but its cameo in Yoshi's Island DS is pretty boss. * Ice Hockey: Fat guy, normal guy and skinny guy hit the ice. * Pinball: Mario moonlights as a paddle in this one. * Soccer: Another early NES sports title. About soccer! * Tennis: Simple but effective volley action. * Urban Champion: An early, and not particularly good, brawler. * Wario's Woods: A falling-block puzzle game starring Wario. * Baseball: Yet another early NES sports game. * Solomon's Key: A surprisingly difficult puzzle-action game.

      SNES Games (800 Wii Points)
      * F-Zero: A futuristic racer that reinvented the genre. * SimCity: Make your city awesome and you'll get a statue of Mario!

      N64 Games (1000 Wii Points)

      * Super Mario 64: The template for 3D platform gaming.

      Genesis Games (800 Wii Points)
      * Sonic the Hedgehog: Spiky guy, attitude, goes fast. You know this one. * Altered Beast: This bestial brawler will make you wise fwom your gwave! * Golden Axe: One of the best multiplayer brawlers ever made. * Columns: Before Bejeweled, there was Columns. * Ecco the Dolphin: Save the ocean in this beautiful (but difficult) adventure. * Gunstar Heroes: The action/shooter/platformer/brawler that made Treasure a hardcore fave. * Space Harrier II: A fast-paced shooter featuring super-scaler action! * Toe Jam & Earl: A funky and oddly mellow adventure. * Ristar: Sega's less popular 16-bit mascot. * Dr. Robotnik's Mean Bean Machine: (Psst, it's actually Puyo Pop.)

      TurboGrafx 16 Games (600 Wii Points)
      * Bonk's Adventure: Carnivorous caveman antics. * Super Star Soldier: Superlative space shooting. * Victory Run: Slick racing action. * Bomberman '93: Explosive multiplayer mayhem. * Dungeon Explorer: Classic RPG combat.

      Nintendo / First-Party
      Excite Truck
      The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess
      Wii Sports (bundled with the Wii console)
      Third Parties
      Activision
      Call of Duty 3
      Marvel: Ultimate Alliance
      Rapala Tournament Fishing
      Tony Hawk's Downhill Jam
      World Series of Poker
      Atari
      Dragon Ball Z Budokai: Tenkaichi 2
      Atlus
      Trauma Center: Second Opinion
      EA
      Madden NFL 07
      Need for Speed: Carbon
      Konami
      Elebits
      Midway
      The Ant Bully
      The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy
      Happy Feet
      Rampage: Total Destruction
      Sega
      Super Monkey Ball: Banana Blitz
      SNK
      Metal Slug Anthology
      Tecmo
      Super Swing Golf
      THQ
      Avatar: The Last Airbender
      Barnyard
      Cars
      SpongeBob SquarePants: Creature from the Krusty Krab
      Ubisoft
      Far Cry: Vengeance
      GT Pro Series
      Monster 4x4: World Circuit
      Open Season
      Rayman Raving Rabbids
      Red Steel
      Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Double Agent
      Vivendi
      Ice Age 2: The Meltdown
      Then again, I recall that the great devil, Websense, blocks /., too. . ..

      --
      Ninjas and pirates. How piquant.
    2. Re:Can someone post the list? by Reapman · · Score: 1

      Interesting Virtual Console list... I remember spending an entire weekend playing Space Harrier, trying to finish it before the rental was due Back =D. there's a number on there I know I'd be interested in buying off the bat (Bonk's Adventure always intrigued me, but not enough to buy the TurboGraphix thing) I'll probably pick a Wii up by year's end, or in January.

  9. Screw this, this list sucks by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Not a single lightgun game (I have no idea if they can do lightgun emulation with that fancy Wii controler or not)
    Not a single Super Mario title (with the exception of Mario 64 which happens to be the most expensive title on the entire service)
    Only one N64 game (although maybe thats because thats the only N64 game that actually WORKS right now...)
    Only 2 SNES games

    I expect some of the omissions (metroid, smash bros, mario kart, zelda III) are omitted because Nintendo have sequals to those coming early in the life of the Wii (they probobly dont want gamers buying Zelda III with a couple bucks of Wii points instead of buying the new Zelda on the Wii for example)

    I do concur with something I saw about allowing any company to make a release over the Wii virtual console with nintendo and the company splitting the cost. Nintendo gets more games for pretty much zero cost. The company that owns the game gets money for almost no effort. Win-Win.

    1. Re:Screw this, this list sucks by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Also, another thing to think about with the list is that they may not want to release games that compete directly with stuff they already have on the Gameboy Advance or Nintendo DS...

    2. Re:Screw this, this list sucks by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      (I have no idea if they can do lightgun emulation with that fancy Wii controler or not)

      The pictures of a sawed-off shotgun shell for the Wiimote that I've seen around the net somewhere--assuming they aren't 'shopped--would seem to indicate that this is possible. If there's a problem, it's probably that Nintendo won't want to spend a lot of time trying to get each individual lightgun game translated to the Wiimote's tip-tilt sensors (or accelerometers, or whatever it's using).

      (they probobly dont want gamers buying Zelda III with a couple bucks of Wii points instead of buying the new Zelda on the Wii for example).

      Those people will be more than counterbalanced by the number of people who purchase the new Zelda and then decide that they'd like to throw the old one in for a quick spin--and then purchase the game _right there_ on their Wii console (rather than finding their SNES or using emulation, if available). I don't know many people who would buy a brand new console only to decide that the games are too expensive and play nothing but old rereleases because they're cheaper; I know at least one person who enjoys older games but doesn't really have the savvy for emulation (and who would probably would be reluctant to emulate it illegally or using some third-party Gametap-like system).

    3. Re:Screw this, this list sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of these have current releases out already in the portable market:
      Mario Bros. is included in every Super Mario Advanced title;
      The Legend of Zelda and Donkey Kong are Classic NES Series GBA ports; and
      Super Mario 64 is available for the NDS

    4. Re:Screw this, this list sucks by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if people will not buy the new titles because they're buying old stuff. It really depends on the price. I'm not sure how much 500 points cost, but I'd probably rather play a new Zelda game than play the original Zelda again. Although the original Zelda is fun, I've played it too much, and it's too easy to beat (even the second quest). I wonder if they will ever put out another Zelda game with a second quest...

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Screw this, this list sucks by zerocommazero · · Score: 1
      You've to remember that its in their best interest to release the Virtual console titles in small groups. If they dumped every game available on there then the majority would barely be noticed and the hype would die a month or so after most people purchase the system. Now they can make events out of certain games and give a handpicked batch of titles their chance in the sun again. This will give them a chance to also make sure the virtual console is being checked often to see what new games are available and make it an active portal for new release ads or whatever.

      Maybe they could do a promotion where pre-ordering a new Wii game that's a franchise will get you an (or all) older Virtual title(s) for free as a bonus. Or how about a score ranking tournament where certain older games are available for download and on the opening month the player scores are logged globally. Prizes could be more Wii points to buy more games. It would be great to see how you rank.

      I can't wait to play Gunstar Heroes again with some friends and finally on a decent controller (I'm looking at you, SEGA).

    6. Re:Screw this, this list sucks by andy9701 · · Score: 1
      Only one N64 game (although maybe thats because thats the only N64 game that actually WORKS right now...)


      I would be surprised if this was the case. After all, both Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask have been previously released for the GameCube. And since the Wii has similar/same hardware as the GameCube, I'm sure at least those two games are working fine.

      Of course, if anyone has those games for the GameCube, there is no reason for them to buy them again on the VC.
    7. Re:Screw this, this list sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know it's on GameTap, right?

  10. PC Engine (TurboGrafx) games! by nickos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm really looking forward to playing Bonk's Adventure and Super Star Soldier again, but why are they launching Bomberman '93 instead of Bomberman '94!!!

    1. Re:PC Engine (TurboGrafx) games! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Nintendo we're talking about. Expect Bomberman '94 to be released next year. Oh but you already purchased the inferior version, that's too bad. Anyways, you should be use to it by now.

    2. Re:PC Engine (TurboGrafx) games! by nickos · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have said "home" platform - the PC Engine/TurboGrafx was codeveloped by Hudson Soft and NEC...

    3. Re:PC Engine (TurboGrafx) games! by Cutriss · · Score: 1

      They're launching both. It's just that the US isn't good enough for Bomberman '94 (yet).

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    4. Re:PC Engine (TurboGrafx) games! by nickos · · Score: 1

      I live in Europe and used to have an imported Japanese PC Engine with Japanese versions of both Bomberman '93 and Bomberman '94. I'm wondering if Hudson Soft only made an English version of Bomberman '93 - that would explain why they would release that instead of Bomberman '94 in the US...

  11. No thanks by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

    You want me to pay extra for ancient games? I'll stick with my emulators, thanks. I'm glad they are making it available though, and with 32 launch titles at least they aren't pulling a 360 (pun intended) by relying on arcade games to unfortunately keep some gamers interested in their sorry-ass overpriced system.

    --
    Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
    1. Re:No thanks by haleyeah · · Score: 1

      I use NESEM for the Palm to play some classics also. Though with the old school rectangular shape of the WiiMote I hope to get my 8-bit skillz back. Had a hell of a time doing the SMB 3-1 turtle trick or getting thru Contra even with the 30 lives cheat. I have to blame my palm d-pad to retain my self-esteem.

    2. Re:No thanks by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      I'm just glad I've already grabbed all the complete ROM sets. I imagine the mainstream sale of classic Nintendo games on this scale would be all the incentive they need to finally start cracking down on the ROM trading, **AA style.

    3. Re:No thanks by @madeus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You want me to pay extra for ancient games?

      You are not being asked to pay extra, you are just being asked to pay.

      I'll stick with my emulators, thanks

      You mean "I'll stick with not paying because I can get them for free".

    4. Re:No thanks by Kimos · · Score: 1

      As much as I'm a supporter of the VC and plan to buy games off of there, I do understand why people have objections to paying for the same old games again...

      Oblig: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2006/09/14

    5. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROMs are not so much "I'll stick with not paying because I can get them for free" as "I'll stick with not paying for them again". We don't like needless new movie and music media formats, why are games different.

      Hurray for Nintendo doing VC, though, and offering this stuff to people who missed it the first go-round.

    6. Re:No thanks by HappySqurriel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As much as I'm a supporter of the VC and plan to buy games off of there, I do understand why people have objections to paying for the same old games again...

      If you have objections you realize that you don't have to buy the games ...

      If you own the games and a system then feel free to play those games on that system ...

      If you don't own the game, or the system, buy it online from ebay; you'll probably be able to get a NES/SNES/N64 game for about $10 (plus shipping) and you'll be able to buy a system for about $20 (plus shipping).

      Personally, I agree with the argument for getting "Abandonware" for free being that there are no longer many legal ways to pay for those games; when companies like Nintendo and Gametap start making legal ways to gain access to their old libraries it is not reasonable to continue to steal those games.

    7. Re:No thanks by Nalanthi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've always thought this "What the?!?!? they expect me to pay money for mario again!!" stuff to be... rather short sighted. The industry has several choices on what to do with old games. They can just leave them to collect dust forever and become forgotten and unavailable as the original hardware and emulators become broken and obscure. This requires neither them or us to spend money but you will eventually lose your ability to play these games unless you are extremely technicaly inclined like oh say.. some old DOS games. They can give away the rights to emulate it to a company that can monetize those rights in such away as to ensure that the game remains playable. This means that you can continue to play the game but you must pay for it in order to compensate the company for format shifting the content. They can build legacy hardware or emulators into their current products. Hardware is expensive and could easily be labled "questionable tech shoved down our throats." Sony had to include a PS2 chip in the PS3 to enable backwards compatability and I don't intend to chunk my PS2 so I don't really need this. Either way you have to pay either for the hardware to continue to play the game or the software develepment of the emulator and any space shifting of content that must be done.

      The bottom line is that you are paying money for services rendered. If you want to play Mario on your NES no one is going to charge you a dime. But if you want to play Mario on a different system don't you think the people that did the work to make this possible and distributed it deserve some compensation.

      As gamers we have proved that we are not happy with any of the possible options.

      The Xbox360 was lambasted for there lack of complete backwards compatibility. They tried to keep costs down by only emulating easy and desired games. The gaming community judges them for not providing what they want.

      The PS3 includes a PS2 chipset to ensure complete backwards compatibility with the PS2 and PS1. Gamers applaud. Then we judge them for providing a console that costs 500 dollars (IMHO the 600 dollar version really only adds bells and whistles unlike the differences between the Xbox360s)

      The Wii bases itself on the current hardware to ensure for backwards capability and low costs and they get lambasted for not being next-gen. THEN they provide an emulator and download service for almost all of the consoles they have ever produced and gamers fuss because we are expected to pay again for games we have already bought as if writing the emulator, format shifting the content, setting up the distribution channel and the bandwidth don't cost Nintendo anything.

      We don't like No backwards compatibility. We don't like free but incomplete backwards compatibility. We don't like expensive consoles with perfect backwards compatibility. We dont like cheap consoles with good backwards compatibility. We don't like paying for backwards compatibility.

      --
      I can't find my .sig file!
    8. Re:No thanks by BTWR · · Score: 1
      Personally, I agree with the argument for getting "Abandonware" for free being that there are no longer many legal ways to pay for those games; when companies like Nintendo and Gametap start making legal ways to gain access to their old libraries it is not reasonable to continue to steal those games.

      Exactly. True, you still can make an argument for being able to download Big Top or some old PC game, but there really is no way around defending ROM sharing now that they're affordably available and easily available (on, after all, a console, which is ALWAYS better than a ROM with a USB gamepad sitting in a deskchair 2 feet from the screen).

    9. Re:No thanks by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

      So if companies come up with ways for consumers to give them money, you're willingly going to step forward with your wads of cash and give it to them, but if they don't, then copying it is no problem. Wow, companies LOVE people like you. BTW copying/repeating information != stealing. Yes, I will continue to share my games with all my friends, since it's my civic duty to share.

      --
      Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
  12. Not all NES games were "original IP" by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative
    Go to third parties and say to them 'how would you like some free money?' They'll put their back catalogues up for download, no problem, because it costs them nothing to do it and they stand to get some money.

    Unless it's LJN/Acclaim or Ultra Games/Konami, which made a lot of movie/TV license games. I doubt that Mirage Studios would agree to license the classic Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles games in a new edition for nothing. Likewise with Fox and The Simpsons. But then, I wouldn't even want to play Robocop.

    1. Re:Not all NES games were "original IP" by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that they'd have to relicense anything for those games. They already have a license to sell that game, and since they are selling the exact same game, I don't think there would be anything to worry about. Also I think a lot of these studios would love to have their old games put out the games again if they received a little something in return. There's a new TMNT movie coming out, they could create a lot of hype by telling people to go download the old games for their Wii. Although I hated the Original TMNT game for NES. Despite owning it, I never could beat it.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Not all NES games were "original IP" by iocat · · Score: 1

      Many licenses have time limits. So even if it's the exact same game; they still time out. (See AD&D for Intellivision as an example -- same ROM as the good old days, but the IntellivisionLives guys can't release it.) A lot of time the time limits in the original contracts were super long for the time -- 10 years or more -- but uh... yeah... turned out not to be long enough! I say this working for a company that does a lot of Xbox Live Arcade work, so I have some familiarity with the issue.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  13. Terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a piss poor list. Where are all the Zeldas? Where are the SNES games? Where are the N64 games? This tiny list is inexcusable. Just upload them all.

  14. genesis oh yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gunstar Heroes: The action/shooter/platformer/brawler that made Treasure a hardcore fave.

    wii is looking really tempting. and for 250 euros!

    hp

  15. VC by Xymor · · Score: 1

    VC is a pretty cool feat, and nintedo certaily has a huge library of classic games, but since I spend so little time at home, I'd favor playing classic Ps1 games on the PSP than classic VC nintendo games at home. They have to come up with someway to use the DS to run these games, that'll be a killer app.

    1. Re:VC by cspariah · · Score: 1

      Many classic games are already being ported to the DS and GBA, for example there's a GBA port of the original Legend of Zelda. Capcom just put out a GBA cart that has the NES Strider, Bionic Commando and Mighty Final Fight on it. I pretty much lost my mind when I saw that one. Bionic Commando!

  16. Enough storage by Quila · · Score: 1

    NES was about 48 KB per cartridge, TurboGrafx 2.5 MB, SNES & Genesis 4 MB, N64 64 MB. I know many are less, and bank switching lets it go higher, so I just used the standard max size.

    Looks like I should be able to put a lot of games on a 1 GB memory module. But we're going to have problems if they start releasing CD titles for those systems that had that option.

    1. Re:Enough storage by revlayle · · Score: 1

      Speaking of limits for SNES/MegaDrive/T16 ROMs.... those are the TOP limits of size. Many MegaDrive and SNES ROMs came in easily under 2MB (even 1MB or 512K). I'm sure (not 100%) the T16 HuCards have similar lower-end size proportions.

    2. Re:Enough storage by Maul · · Score: 1

      I don't think we'll have much of a problem even if they start releasing the CD titles. There are actually only a handful of GOOD games for the 16-bit era CD systems. Many of them were never released in North America, and I'm not holding my breath for a localized Dracula X appearing on the virtual console, though that would kick ass if it happened.

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    3. Re:Enough storage by kinglink · · Score: 1

      They don't have emulation for the CD titles.... yet

      But if they do then they can always release bigger memory modules.

    4. Re:Enough storage by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Actually, there were at least two 6MB games for SNES: Tales of Phantasia and Star Ocean. Theoretically, you could make a 8MB SNES cartridge, although I do not believe any were ever made (and a lot (around 0.5MB, I think) of the last 2MB would overlap with memory allocations for various subsystems).

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    5. Re:Enough storage by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      The Wii's memory modules are just plain SD cards, so Nintendo doesn't have to release them, although I think they will sell branded SD cards. Also, older games probably had awful compression compared to today's standards. It would take some extra work, but CD games (and maybe N64, too) could probably be cut down in size with a bit a reworking.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    6. Re:Enough storage by Quila · · Score: 1
      those are the TOP limits of size.

      I gave the regular listed max. Many are less, but some are bank-switched to allow several times that amount. The NES could address 32KB of ROM at a time, making that the actual maximum using simple addressing, but one game actually had a 1 MB ROM.
    7. Re:Enough storage by Cowclops · · Score: 1

      I don't know, all those REALLY early games from like 1985/1986 might be 48KB, but most of the NES games i actually play are 256KB, 384KB, or 512KB. Mega Man 2 was 256, 3 was 384, and 4-5-6 were 512KB. SMB3 was 384, Castlevania 2 was 256, 3 was 512. Even Metroid, Zelda, and Contra were 128KB and these games have relatively simple graphics. I'd call the average more like 256 based on the fact that about half of the roms I have are 256, and theres definitely plenty of 512KB games to make up for the ones that are smaller than 256KB.

  17. Yeah, ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tetris is available for the Nintendo DS: http://www.nintendo.com/gamemini?gameid=SHMfI4-pd_ DDhbjpYkb631-LunYD1UhC

    And this is an excellent version of this game - not the shitty Tetris Worlds that was released a few years ago for all the consoles.

  18. Maybe Bundle Future Releases? by Kirby-meister · · Score: 1
    I think they could do wonders if they had promotions where, for example, if you buy Metroid Prime 3, you'd get Super Metroid and the original Metroid free (or at least at a discount).

    They could always figure "Super Metroid will be purchased anyways, we'll just charge full price." But if they want to reach those casual gamers who have never played a 2D game before, it might be a nice offer.

    1. Re:Maybe Bundle Future Releases? by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      That's a good idea. That would also possibly allow for packages or something like that. What if you could buy Castlevania 1-3 for 10 bucks rather than 5 each? Or perhaps all the Mario Bros games for 1200 points. All the Metriod games...

      Good call

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  19. The Nintendo offerings are a bit lacking... by revlayle · · Score: 1

    ... luckily, the Genesis/MegaDrive and T16 offerings are GOLD.

    1. Re:The Nintendo offerings are a bit lacking... by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I understand why they are promoting NES titles over the rest, but why aren't there any light gun games?

    2. Re:The Nintendo offerings are a bit lacking... by revlayle · · Score: 1

      Dunno, I, personally, never cared for most of the light gun games on the NES. However, I am quite sure there are a ton of folks who were.

    3. Re:The Nintendo offerings are a bit lacking... by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Maybe the "drivers" for using the Wiimote as a light gun haven't been given priority. Or maybe they do not want to use it as a light gun because light guns apparently have problems with non-CRT TVs. It would take extra reworking of the games to use a pointer instead of a light gun.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    4. Re:The Nintendo offerings are a bit lacking... by trdrstv · · Score: 1
      Traditional light guns have problems with non CRT's (rear projection in particular) but that's why the sensor bar was added. you are actuaaly interfacing with that and not the TV for aiming / shooting. Also Rayman has minigames using the wii-mote as a gun, Red Steel (among others) also. So I'm inclined to believe this function works.

      I understand the old games worked differently, but I find it difficult to believe they couldn't fix this given the complexity of the Wii-mote.

    5. Re:The Nintendo offerings are a bit lacking... by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Exactly, they would have to rewrite the games to determine if the Wiimote was pointing at an object instead of simply being able to check if the light gun senses light when that object is lit up. It is not a simple drop-in fix. Their devs are busy with getting new games done for launch, and the other VC games they just have to drop the ROM file in. Anyway, you will notice a lot of classics missing from the initial VC line-up. Nintendo doesn't want to be selling VC games at launch.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
  20. Slashdotted. anyone got it? by sherriw · · Score: 1

    Can somone post the list? It's down...

  21. Why would anyone want it for the Wii???? by technoextreme · · Score: 1

    It's not like we are entirely being deprived of Zelda 3. Just pick it up from a Best Buy for the GBA at $19.99. All of Nintendos classics are being priced like that except for a few.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:Why would anyone want it for the Wii???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I should spend an extra $15 for it, and buy a gameboy rather than play it on the Wii for $5?

    2. Re:Why would anyone want it for the Wii???? by CarnivoreMan · · Score: 1

      I think the SNES games for the virtual console begin at $8. I'd assume a premium game like Zelda 3 would command a premium price... Lets hope the price isnt TOO premium though.

    3. Re:Why would anyone want it for the Wii???? by trdrstv · · Score: 2

      Flat rate pricing. No premium for premium games, but no discounts either (at least not yet).

    4. Re:Why would anyone want it for the Wii???? by CarnivoreMan · · Score: 1

      Oh cool, thats good to hear. I read an article on IGN lastnight that said "Starting at $8." I definately prefer the flat rate.

  22. Squirrels with Attitude by clem · · Score: 1

    Oh, Conker's Bad Fur Day, where are you?

    --
    Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    1. Re:Squirrels with Attitude by grumbel · · Score: 1
      Oh, Conker's Bad Fur Day, where are you?

      Conker got a remake on XBox, and since Rare belongs to Microsoft now don't except him to set a foot on Nintendo territory anytime soon again.

    2. Re:Squirrels with Attitude by thebosz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Over on the Xbox. Since Conker is a Rare-owned property and Microsoft owns Rare, it's quite unlikely we'll see any Rare games on the VC, which is quite sad. Note though, that only includes entirely Rare-owned properties. Stuff that Nintendo owned, but Rare developed (like Donkey Kong Country) should appear sometime in the future.

      Yes, this means that the likely hood of Perfect Dark is absolutely nil, buy there's a small chance of Goldeneye on there (but that's a whole slew of licensing issues right there).

      Of course, these are just guesses from some random Nintendo fan, anyone know for sure?

      --
      The Kerr Divine: My wife's battle with a mysterious illness.
  23. Misprint... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sadly, launch and DNF seem to be mutually exclusive."

    There, fixed it for you.

  24. Where oh where is Mario Party? by Wyrd01 · · Score: 1

    I'm quite dismayed to not see Mario Party on the Wii release list. What a perfect venue to show off the capabilities of the Wii controller, and to get family members, young and old, to play together.

    I'm also sad not to see an odler version on the virtual console... a new version with minigames that fully utilize the Wii-mote will be incredible, but until they produce that they could at least offer an older version... still promotes the idea of young and old playing together.

  25. Oldies but goodies-Wii gives games a second chance by sherriw · · Score: 1

    I see this as being a way for older unappreciated games to get a second chance. I realize the top, most popular games will get added to the list first, but there are some old gems like B.O.B. and Goof Troop (SNES?) that I played for hours as a kid and never got to finish- I'd love a second crack at them.

    This might also be a way for some GC titles that were REAL treasures (like Beyond Good & Evil) to have a second chance. Part of me is crossing my fingers that Ubisoft re-releases a 'Gold' edition of BG&E for the Wii. That game deserved more attention.

    I think this will do even more to encourage the niche games and corner markets. If you can develop a game with the super cheap developer package and then distribute it cheaply online- I can see lots of good odd-ball stuff becoming available. *rubs hands together*

  26. The third parties JUST DON'T GET IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the quantity of crappy games based on kids movies! This show me that despite Nintendo's efforts to branch out to "non gamers", to "everyone", and also revolutionizing games via new control methods, the third party publishers JUST DON'T GET IT. They are marketing the same kind of games as they currently put out for Game Cube. This does not bode well for Nintendo. :-(

    1. Re:The third parties JUST DON'T GET IT! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of that is just new-console-jitters. We may love the Wii, but that doesn't mean the suits at these publishers are convinced it will be a hit. Vivendi is the only one who is offering only movie tie-ins. Other than that, a movie tie in is an easy piece of crap to dump out and make some money from, but they've all got at least one real game for the console.

      Even if it is disturbingly populated with movie/tv show tie ins, you have to admit that as far as third party support goes this launch is ten times better than the Game Cube's and a hundred times better than the N64's. If the Wii does well over Christmas, I'd expect these publishers who launched one or two real games as experiments to start going for more.

      I hope.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:The third parties JUST DON'T GET IT! by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      Ubisoft will make a killing, and others will take notice. UBi is betting big on the Wii with 8 titles at launch, and 7 more by the end of March 07.

  27. Sounds good... by JayBlalock · · Score: 1
    Come on, did we honestly expect them to release every A-list title immediately upon launch? How in the world would they sustain the service? The bunch they've got there seems fine to me, and the Sega selection is especially strong.

    What I'm miffed at is the delay for the new Smash Bros. It was SUPPOSED to be a launch title; and the one I was most looking forward to. I'm sure I'll still get a Wii, but it's kind of irritating.

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    1. Re:Sounds good... by revlayle · · Score: 1

      Smash Bros. was dismissed from launch status MONTHS ago... E3 at least.

  28. Wario Ware: Smooth Moves by kmhebert · · Score: 1

    WOOPS! That was one I was really looking forward to playing at my New Year's party! Oh well, the pre-order is still good. Just 18 more days! Any news on midnight launch parties or being able to sneak in before the 19th to finagle your Wii (uhh...) from a clueless store employee?

    --
    Regular Meta Moderators are not more likely to get mod points.
  29. I was hoping for more by British · · Score: 1

    With 20+ years of games under its belt(and then some), I was hoping for a much larger virtual console launch list. Sure, 90% of the NES games are side-scrolling run & jump games, but it would have been nice to have them there. I understand there was licensing issues and such for 3rd party titles, but still. Why no Sega Master System games? heck, offer them for $1.00 for people to get a taste of the fun of virtual console.

    Heck, hire a MAME developer, and license some arcade titles over too.

    Sure, these "launch titles" are old games, but having a lot of them can outdo Sony's # of launch titles.

  30. What, no Baloon Fight?!? :( by wikthemighty · · Score: 1

    Guess I'll just have to stick to my e-Reader for that one (didn't make the GBA NES Classics series in the US either...)

    --
    "There are people who do not love their fellow human being, and I _hate_ people like that!" - Tom Lehrer
  31. Sega games! Woohoo! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'd figure they're waiting on Zelda 3. Or maybe they think that if you really loved Zelda, you'd buy a GBA and Zelda 3. Me, I'll just plug in my still-working SNES and enjoy it the way it was meant to be enjoyed: Drunk. I mean with the SNES controller.

    That for me is the problem with the virtual console lineup here. My SNES and NES still work, and almost all the games I'd want to play I already have -- including Solomon's Key, which I am surprised to see, but glad that a new generation will get to see the most evil puzzle game ever.

    But those Sega games! I don't own a Genesis, and I think Golden Axe and Altered Beast are going to be my first Virtual Console purchases, followed shortly by Toe Jam and Earl.

    I guess my point is that while every one of us could pick games that we'd like to see, this is a pretty good launch lineup for the VC, and I'm guessing that most people's wishes will be met as they continue to release games.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  32. Missing games by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Wii:
    - Metroid Prime 3 (comes out in 2007, I know)

    Virtual Console:
    - Contra (NES/Famicom)
    - Dragon Warrior / Dragon Quest (NES/Famicom)
    - R-Type (TurboGrafx-16/PC-Engine)
    - Shining Force (SEGA Genesis/Megadrive)

  33. Personally it's Rayman's Raving Rabbits 4 me by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I'm addicted to all the trailers and movies and can't wait to Wii that.

    Boo ya!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  34. Re:Missing games - Animal Crossing and Spore by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    both 2007

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  35. European release list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're releasing VC games at 10 a month - this gives them time to get the testing done, as well as keeping the service interesting (and profitable) for longer. Can't really complain about that, their a corporation after all.

    As I'm commenting, I might as well point out that the European release lists are also out. No Excite Truck, no Metal Slug, no sale! The sole launch game that really interests me is Monkey Ball, as well as Gunstar Heroes on VC.

    Still, I'll probably get one when Wario Ware comes out, or perhaps I'll even wait for Mario Galaxy. A good thing, really, I'm happier buying after a chance to try it out.

  36. Re:Missing games - Animal Crossing and Spore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spore is not official yet. It's EA, so a version for every console down to GBA is pretty likely, but there's no telling how gimped it'll be - ever play Sims DS for instance?
    Personally speaking, with a vast and complex game like Spore, I'm thinking that the platform with the most RAM is likely to be the one to go for.

  37. SSB DS... by glowingsnowball · · Score: 0

    My real question is why they never put super smash on the DS? Forget the bottom screen as an input and use it as a screen because SSB requires a lot of screen. The buttons and triggers are there and you could play it with other people using Nintendo WIFI. I know if Microsoft had a hand-held it would suck and have halo (If halo wasn't on a console people would make fun of it, it's the worst pc shooter ever but the best console shooter .Generic guns, story-line and game play. Great music but I've never played a game and liked it based on music. Halo is plain.) on it. So I beg anyone who works at Nintendo and may happen to read this PUT SUPER SMASH BROTHERS on the DS.

    --
    " I think that freedom is Americas biggest export. Atleast untill China can stamp it out for 20 cents a unit."
  38. Wii points = ???$ by Kuvter · · Score: 1

    It doesn't say how much a Wii point is worth, but is sounds like 1 cent = 1 Wii point. So if that's true then a NES game would be $5 up to an N64 game being $10. This fits closely with their pricing scheme they had before.

    I'm assuming they set up Wii points so parents could get their kids gift cards, with say 3000 Wii points on it, so kids can now get the games online with out a credit card.

    --
    "To be is to do." --Socrates
    "To do is to be." -- Aristotle
    "Do-Be-Do-Be-Do..." --Sinatra
  39. What TG16 Games Do You Want? by sottitron · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see Ninja Spirit and Blazing Lasers. Also, a version of Keith Courage where you only play with the suit on - the part where you are a human or whatever in that game SUCKED.

  40. Just like to point out by ZakuSage · · Score: 1

    As Nintendo did back when they released "Zelda: Collector's Edition", GameCube remains and will remain even with the Wii virtual console the only system to be able to play every notable Zelda title (which means on CDI games, thank god...). Unfortionitely, the virtual console will not support GB[C/A] games, which means no Link's Awakening [DX], Oracle of Ages, Oracle of Seasons, Four Swords, or Minish Cap. This will remain true until Phantom Hourglass gets released for DS sometime in late 2007 or in 2008, or until a real Wii Zelda gets released.

    LONG LIVE GAMECUBE!!!

  41. Re:Sega games! Woohoo! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    I don't know about Altered Beast, but I have played both versions of Golden Axe and the Genesis version is the one I'd say was much better... What with being more than twice as long. The arcade version felt like a rip-off, slightly better graphics be damned.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  42. I'm ridin' spinners, they don't stop... by tepples · · Score: 1
    And this is an excellent version of this game - not the shitty Tetris Worlds that was released a few years ago for all the consoles.

    Unfortunately, Henk made Nintendo put infinite spin into Tetris DS just like in Tetris Worlds.

  43. Tetris will probably not make the list by tepples · · Score: 1

    Tetris is not a Nintendo title. It is a Tetris Holding title that was ported to NES by Nintendo, and a Nintendo employee has claimed that Henk Rogers and Alexey Pajitnov would likely overcharge for a Wii rerelease.

  44. Ten year life-cycle? Or just a Bait And Switch? by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 1

    Something's not right. Nintendo and it's partners have announced something on the order 1200+ titles for the Wii's Virual Console. At a release rate of 10 titles per month it will take 10 years to release them all. Ten years? They're going to need step up the pace to stay credible.

    --
    +0 Meh
  45. Re:Missing games - Animal Crossing and Spore by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Good point. So you think that Spore on the Wii will be more like the Sims 2 on the GameCube version - far more limited?

    Still, am really looking forward to Animal Crossing II on the Wii - especially being able to visit my friends villages over the Net without worrying about bad guys digging up my stuff.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  46. A paltry offering by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who feels disappointed with the initial Virtual Console offerings? Looking at the list, at least half of these titles have already been re-released and re-re-released, mainly those from Sega and Nintendo.

    Don't get me wrong, I love the idea of the VC, but I can't see any game on the list right now that greatly interest me. Hopefully the next ten that come out are some of the more popular or better games, and that Nintendo can get other companies to jump on board.

    "Hey, do you guys want to work for a week or two and make some easy money?"

    I'm particularily hoping for FFIII (US version) and Super Mario RPG.

    I also hope they lower the prices. As it stands, there are many games I want to play, but few that I can really do at $5+ a pop. Nintendo needs to realize that most, if not all, of the games being offered are available online for emulation. Not exactly legal, but far cheaper. Hell, you can get most non-popular N64 games for around $10 used at places that still carry them; this would then only be a benefit if you don't already have an N64 (which are themselves quite cheap).

    A better pricing model, IMO, would be $2-$4-$6.

  47. Re:Oldies but goodies-Wii gives games a second cha by Pacifist+Brawler · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the point of the VC was to support pre-GC games and the Wii can play Gamecube discs directly.

    --
    IANA*
  48. Re:Oldies but goodies-Wii gives games a second cha by sherriw · · Score: 1

    Yeah I know... I didn't think it would be on VC. Just maybe a relaunch of the actual game for GC and Wii. Sad wishful thinking, I know. ;)