Slashdot Mirror


Optimus OLED Keyboard Pre-Orders Start Dec. 12

Jupix writes, "After almost a year and a half of public development, the Optimus OLED keyboard is nearing completion. According to the project blog, pre-orders for the Optimus-103 will start on December 12. The price is unspecified at this time, but Art Lebedev has said the keyboard will cost 'less than a good mobile phone' (probably about $400). Don't expect to see those 10 programmable function keys on the left on this first version, though, as they will not make their debut until the Optimus-113, released later."

289 comments

  1. What key switching tech does it use? by vistic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone know what kind of switches it uses?

    At that price I'd expect buckling spring switches (like the old IBM Model M) or mechanical Alps switches (like the old Apple Extended Keyboard II). Although I think only Unicomp makes buckling spring keyboards anymore.

    I'd be disappointed if keys that look so nice, just have a squishy feel to them like a cheap rubber-dome membrane Dell keyboard.

    1. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      huh? The squishy feeling is a good thing(tm) Its called a quiet keyboard. I very much dislike the spring keyboards, esp if yo use them for data entry. With quiet keyboards its much easier to press the keys.

    2. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by imbaczek · · Score: 4, Funny

      HERETIC!

    3. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by Wirus+from+Warszawa · · Score: 1

      It looks like it is a quiet keyboard.

      Their technical blog has a lot of information on the keyboard and its design. Very interesting.

    4. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But much harder to tell if a key has been pressed. The positive feedback from a decent buckling spring keyboard is invaluable.

        When I'm short on cash, I do data entry sometimes (not so much these days, thank krishna/allah/jehovah/zeus/whoever) - but it would be completely unbearable without my model-m-alike.

    5. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by olenikm · · Score: 1

      Although I sometimes like the clicky feel of mechanical switches, it's worth pointing out that membranes are an order of magnitude more reliable, long lasting and cheaper. No, the $400 is probably for all the OLED displays.

    6. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know what kind of switches it uses?

      http://static.flickr.com/51/151575397_47393fd3e6_m .jpg

      KFG

    7. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by cygnus · · Score: 1
      Although I sometimes like the clicky feel of mechanical switches, it's worth pointing out that membranes are an order of magnitude more reliable, long lasting and cheaper.

      well, you're right about cheaper, but otherwise you're nuts. Model Ms last forever, and membrane switch keyboards break all the time...

      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    8. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the supreme keyswitch technology is electric capacitance such as that found on the Happy Hacking Professional keyboard from Fujitsu. The keyswitch passes between two metal plates to discharge an electic current that signals a key press. No physical contact takes place nor is necessary so you will have the longest, most consistent life and best responsiveness. This is usually backed up by a metal spring technology (such as the IBM Model M) to give tactile feedback.

      If the Optimus doesn't use electic capatitance then it hardly deserves to be the "premium" keyboard. Then again I think the whole OLED thing is stupid and keycaps should be blank except for the bumps on F and J (on QWERTY). Print on keycaps is a crutch and the solution isn't to make better print! People just need to learn how to type. Computers should come with blank keycaps and an on-screen keyboard map so people don't get in the habit of looking at the keyboard and instead learn to look at the screen.

      If your system still supports PS/2 and you want The Original then I advise looking into getting an older Model M from Clicky Keyboards. I got one of these for about $50. I would get a Customizer from Unicomp if my system only supported USB or I wanted to future proof myself against buying another keyboard in the future. Even then the Happy Hacking Professional is just too tempting.

    9. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by stunt_penguin · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd have said heathen! but I think you were closer to the mark ^^

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    10. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by pudro · · Score: 1

      Where the heck is this $400 number coming from? I looked all over, and the only price I found was half that. They have a press clippings page, and the most recent link there (October 23, 2006) clearly states an expected price around $200.

      --
      Freedom is assumed. Then they try to take it away. The degree to which you resist is the degree to which you are free.
    11. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      At that price I'd expect buckling spring switches (like the old IBM Model M) or mechanical Alps switches (like the old Apple Extended Keyboard II).


      Personally I liked Sun's Type 5 keyboards. You can touch type, or pound the keys down, and they had a good feel IMHO. They also weren't very loud which is useful in cubicle farms (or even school labs).

      Sun dropped the ball with the Type 6 though. Haven't had a chancce to check out the new Type 7 since I'm no longer around may Sun workstations anymore.
    12. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by vistic · · Score: 1

      I suggest going to the surplus warehouse of your local university. I got a black buckling-spring IBM keyboard with built-in trackpoint mouse, in perfect working condition, and clean, for...

      $1.00 incl. tax

      Can't beat that.

    13. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Are you friggin' crazy? I've got a 1985 IBM Model M that still types (and for that matter, looks) brand new. My mom's got a dell branded, logitech made rubber dome keyboard that's pretty much done after about 2 years. Half the keys don't work anymore. And before my Model M I had an older rubber dome that did survive around 5 years, but it's totally shot now. Half the F- keys don't work, the space bar takes about 20 pounds of pressure to register, if it does...neither of the enter keys work, and pretty much half the other keys are randomly shot to hell. I'm sure half the reason Model Ms are so solid is that they're actually well built, with the massive steel plate and heavy plastic and everything, unlike the modern 3oz rubber dome...but really, have you ever taken apart a dome keyboard? That stuff is so thin and flimsy it's amazing they last more than a year!

    14. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      UGH! The "quiet keys" are SO ANNOYING!!!! You press down at a normal pressure, and it only goes halfway. It doesn't press. If you press down extra hard to make it go all the way, it goes double. Those are terrible. That's all the Dells at school and in the library have. I hate them so much. Wireless keyboards tend to have them too. Please, give me a good ol' HP or EMachines keyboard. Those things don't feel funny.

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    15. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      huh? The squishy feeling is a good thing(tm) It's called a quiet keyboard. I very much dislike the spring keyboards, esp if you use them for data entry. With quiet keyboards it's much easier to press the keys.

      My keyboard maybe a bit loud, but at least I can tell when I've pressed the key hard enough for it to register.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    16. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by DemonWeeping · · Score: 1

      The mini three feels rubbery... certainly not buckling spring. I reviewed it when it was released and the screens are great but the software at the time was bunk. Latest updates are more stable, but still quite limited. Extra bonus to adding a Gmail notifier button!

    17. Re:What key switching tech does it use? by SoapDish · · Score: 1

      Anecdotal evidence is not a full argument.

      You have ONE model M keyboard that's working. There are many model M's that have died.

      You talked about 2 cases of rubber dome keyboards failing. There are many cases of rubber dome keyboards not failing so dramatically. I myself have never had a keyboard fail due to the switches.

      Anecdotal evidence is mostly useless in discussions like this. In order to make a good point, we need contro studies looking at: how many units have been produced vs. how many have failed; What level & type of abuse do they undergo; etc.

      Saying that the components in a dome keyboard are flimsy, compared to the steel in old keyboards is also rather pointless, because steel and rubber have very different physical properties. For one thing, rubber can withstand more fatigue, and higher strains than steel (and most other metals). Maybe you need to stop using your sledge hammer to type on the keyboard.

      All that being said, I have no information on which type of keyboard is better. I stick to my cheep wired keyboards that come with the computer, because I don't care enough about it to buy an expensive one. I like the feel of domes, because they require very little pressure, and I can tell whether or not I've pressed a key just fine (without a loud sound telling me everytime).

  2. Forced tilt? by blitzrage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looks like the keyboard is force on an angle. Normally you're able to adjust the height of the keyboard. I generally like my keyboard as flat as possible and my desk/chair set to the right height so my wrists are in a comfortable and flat position instead of being tilted up. Too bad, looks like the keyboard has promise.

    --

    I have no signature
    1. Re:Forced tilt? by Nerftoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just shim up the front of the keyboard. Problem solved. ;)

    2. Re:Forced tilt? by daeg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One would hope after dropping a few C-notes on a keyboard you wouldn't have to shim anything.

    3. Re:Forced tilt? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      On that note, I'd rather see the feet in the front of the keyboard. I'm most comfortable typing when my keyboard is inclined with the back of the keyboard down (of course, you need a rather weird desk or posture for it to work well).

      I just hope this model comes off a bit stronger than the Mini-3 model. Lacklustre software and the high-pitched whine probably scared off a lot of people - I'd be willing to make a big investment in a keyboard if it's high quality and gives me the functionality. Unlike graphics cards and processors, they last a LONG time, and I might as well have the best of the things that I'm physically interacting with (which is why having dropped $1200 on monitors doesn't bother me much).

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    4. Re:Forced tilt? by Penguin+Programmer · · Score: 2

      I agree. That said, I love my Microsoft ergonomic keyboard with the 9 degree reverse tilt.

      Also, why does every fucking keyboard manufacturer in the world feel that they have to screw around with the enter key at every opportunity? You'd think they'd learn that people want a rectangular enter key, with a rectangular backslash/pipe key above it and a rectangular, full-width backspace key above that.

    5. Re:Forced tilt? by sc00ch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Speak for yourself, over here in the UK we have the vertical 2 row (upside down L) enter key. I think there should be various layouts to match the different standards around the world.

    6. Re:Forced tilt? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      You'd think they'd learn that people want a rectangular enter key, with a rectangular backslash/pipe key above it and a rectangular, full-width backspace key above that.

      No thanks. Big enter key please, with a backspace above that, like just about every other computer keyboard I've used in my life.

    7. Re:Forced tilt? by ClamIAm · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What the fuck are you talking about? There is no such thing as a keyboard "standard", unless you're referring to whatever layout happens to be the de facto standard in a particular area. You make it sound like every country has a Keyboard Bureacracy that issues arbitrary decisions on what their keyboards should look like.

    8. Re:Forced tilt? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Funny

      A real hacker always shims something!

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    9. Re:Forced tilt? by ampathee · · Score: 1

      He obviously *was* referring to the de facto standards.
      I think your flamethrower trigger needs tightening.

    10. Re:Forced tilt? by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

      And swap caps lock and CTRL back and function keys on the left as well please...

    11. Re:Forced tilt? by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Ah. Your a ergonomics nut. ;)

      Personally I cant stand a flat keyboard.
      Mind you I hardly have a ergonomically correct computer setup.
      I dont get RSI so I dont care.

    12. Re:Forced tilt? by empaler · · Score: 0, Troll

      Like I just shimmed your momma? :-p

    13. Re:Forced tilt? by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      Big enter key please, with a backspace above that, like just about every other computer keyboard I've used in my life.

      So... because you've had a limited life experience means everyone else's choices should be limited to the ones that you've encountered?

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    14. Re:Forced tilt? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      So... because you've had a limited life experience means everyone else's choices should be limited to the ones that you've encountered?

      You might want to refer to the post I replied to, in order to understand the point I was making.

    15. Re:Forced tilt? by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

      Your country doesn't have a Typematic Lexicon Standards Body? Savage.

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
    16. Re:Forced tilt? by E++99 · · Score: 1
      Also, why does every fucking keyboard manufacturer in the world feel that they have to screw around with the enter key at every opportunity? You'd think they'd learn that people want a rectangular enter key, with a rectangular backslash/pipe key above it and a rectangular, full-width backspace key above that.

      The best thing is when they decide, "backslash key, who on earth uses a backslash key? Let's make it tiny, and then let's think up a whole new freakin location for it."
    17. Re:Forced tilt? by Bipoha · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be able to get used to that keyboard. I hate the "L" shaped ENTER key, and I specifically look for keyboards without it. I would definitely hate having programming the two keys that reside where my one row, two-column wide ENTER key should be. Yuck. Neat keyboard from an artistic standpoint, but it's not something I'd want to use.

    18. Re:Forced tilt? by drew · · Score: 1

      WHAT!?!? Crazy Talk!

      The pipe key goes below the Enter Key.
      http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/acc/sil_6000 /Graphics.htm

      Unfortunately, these keyboards are getting very hard to find. I'm not sure which I fear more- not being able to find a new one when my current keyboard dies, or getting a computer with no PS/2 keyboard port the next time I upgrade.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  3. Functionality Display by RetroGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Overall changes are one thing (ala Quake), but what I want is to have the display change when I press the CTRL or ALT key.

    So that CTRL changes the C key display to COPY and so on. Including the function and specialty keys (arrows, PrtSc).

    And an editor that allows me to customize what the keys show, so when I am programming I can set up the display to match my key mapping preferences. With smart focus management to whatever program is in the foreground.

    --

    - - - - - - - - - - -
    I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    1. Re:Functionality Display by hanssprudel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And an editor that allows me to customize what the keys show, so when I am programming I can set up the display to match my key mapping preferences. With smart focus management to whatever program is in the foreground.

      You shouldn't need an editor for this. Rather they should release a good API, so that is it is easy for every program to tell the keyboard what to display when that program is in focus. Since your IDE already knows your keymaps, you shouldn't have to tell the keyboard again (imagine what a mess).

      This is beautiful technology, but as with so many other things, the difficulty will be in getting programs to support it.

    2. Re:Functionality Display by rehabdoll · · Score: 1

      The display seems to change with caps. Change with CTRL/ALT would seem natural.

    3. Re:Functionality Display by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is a great idea for grandma, who doesn't know how to use a computer, but really isn't that much of an advantage to an advanced computer user who never looks at their keyboard anyway. Anybody who users a computer more than 2 hours a day, should probably learn the key shortcuts and make their life easier. People depend way too much on the mouse, which is understandable in a GUI environment, but even then, using the keyboard is much faster. I could see this being an advantage with VS.Net, and it showing all the key combinations, but at that point, you're still better off memorizing the shortcuts, because looking down at the keyboard to figure out what you want to do is much slower than right click + select option, or even going all the way to the top menu and selecting something out of there. All this reminds me of WordPerfect 5.1. You could do everything via the keyboard, and it was so much nicer to use than any of the modern word processors, because you spent more time getting stuff done, and less time messing around with mice,drop down menus, and the 50,000 fonts we have now.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Functionality Display by Assassin+bug · · Score: 1

      Who says it doesn't?

    5. Re:Functionality Display by RetroGeek · · Score: 1
      All this reminds me of WordPerfect 5.1. You could do everything via the keyboard

      I still use my 15 year old keyboard with function keys down the left side...
      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    6. Re:Functionality Display by RetroGeek · · Score: 1
      This is beautiful technology, but as with so many other things, the difficulty will be in getting programs to support it.

      I am sure that all the open source apps will have this in short order. (Licking lips in anticipation)
      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    7. Re:Functionality Display by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      what I want is to have the display change when I press the CTRL or ALT key.

      It doesn't do this? I thought that's the whole point of this keyboard and the reason why I found it cool. I even had kind of assumed it would include (or at least have planned) a way to make this controllable by the application that has focus, so that, for example, vim or Gimp could display their shortcuts. Not that would be helpful.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    8. Re:Functionality Display by chriso11 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would be happy with an otherwise-normal keyboard that has those special 10 function keys on the side.

      --
      No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
    9. Re:Functionality Display by RetroGeek · · Score: 1
      Anybody who users a computer more than 2 hours a day, should probably learn the key shortcuts and make their life easier.

      I agree with this.

      However I do not have all the key mappings memorized for all applications. Yes the basic ones like cut/paste are part of my "finger macros", but the more estoric ones are not. So I search through the menu system using the mouse.

      Being able to press a control key and having the choices shown on the keyboard would really help, especially since several uses would help me remember them. I do have the key mappings printed out, but a keyboard display would be better.
      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    10. Re:Functionality Display by Enselic · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As a hobbyist game programmer, I immediately began to think about what games you could write for the keyboard itself. My general idea is that you could make all the keys act as one big (low-res) screen.

      You could have a Whack-a-Mole type game, where a mole would display on the keys and you'd have to whack him by pressing one of the keys the mole occupies.

      Or you could make a Snake clone where you would maneuver the snake by tapping on the direction the snake would go.

      Or some kind of piano game, á la Guitar Hero.

    11. Re:Functionality Display by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      Which was the original design.

      Then some idiot designer placed them at the top and that became the standard.

      I still use a keybard from 15 years ago which has functions keys both across the top, and down the side. And it has a cursor key pad which is not that stupid inverted T, but rather a square with PAGE-UP/DOWN HOME/END etc in the right places.

      The only downfall is that new computers do not have PS/2 ports but are rather all USB, which this keyboard does not work with :((

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    12. Re:Functionality Display by alienw · · Score: 1

      You do realize you can buy a usb to PS/2 converter, right? Just checking. Hell, any self-professed geek should be able to design and build one in a couple of days, it's not that hard.

    13. Re:Functionality Display by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      Well yes, but I have found that it does not work with all computer/keyboard/mouse combinations.

      The keyboard I have has a DIN plug attached to a DIN->PS/2 converter.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    14. Re:Functionality Display by icebike · · Score: 1

      Which is a great idea for grandma, who doesn't know how to use a computer, but really isn't that much of an advantage to an advanced computer user who never looks at their keyboard anyway. Anybody who users a computer more than 2 hours a day, should probably learn the key shortcuts and make their life easier. People depend way too much on the mouse, which is understandable in a GUI environment, but even then, using the keyboard is much faster.

      You contradict yourself in the scope of two sentences. ;-)

      Should this become cost effective and widely used, it may be the way away from the mouse, and the most significant development in HID technology since the mouse. (Human Interface Device).

      I've often thought that working with mouse was akin to poking an engine together with a stick.

      The mouse requires that vast amounts of screen realestate on the primary output device be reserved for input functions. This is historically due to the limitations of our primary input device, the keyboard.
      Wouldn't it seem natural to enhance the input device's capability OR move to on-screen keying and abandon the keyboard alltogether?

      Having said that I must observe that looking at a vast array of on-screen Icons trying to figure out which one is your the editor is less than obvious or efficient, and I can quickly see that adding another ever-changing array of icons will lead to a great deal of frustration.

      Just as mankind was forced to develop standardized character sets on the road to literacy, if we continue on this proliferation of the use of icons, we will be forced to develop standardized icon sets instead of using company logos for icons.

      What part of a fox pelt wrapped abound a blue marble screams web browser to the uninitiated?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    15. Re:Functionality Display by ben+there... · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be easier for the keyboard to come with software to recognize which app is focused, along with community-designed key maps for common programs? And a standard XML key map file that could optionally be generated by apps when you change their key mappings?

    16. Re:Functionality Display by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

      They could do both potentially, allowing you to edit what's displayed when a given program has focus, particularly if it doesn't make an attempt to support the keyboard's functionality.

      Then you can make or obtain key mappings for programs that aren't even in development any more, which is pretty desirable on it's own.

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    17. Re:Functionality Display by LocoMan · · Score: 1

      I have to agree here. At least that isn't particularly useful for me, since I very rarely look at the keyboard at all to begin with. On most apps I use regularly (photoshop, premiere, final cut pro and others), once I learnt the shortcuts I always either click on the tools with the mouse or hit the shortcut keys without looking at the keyboard. Same for games (specially FPSs). I usually configure the keyboard so that I can click on the most common actions without having to look at it at all (usually using sdfe instead of asdw and setting everything else on the keys next to those).

      Not to say it won't be useful to anyone, there are some special uses already mentioned where this keyboard would be very useful (regularly switching different languages, for example), but at least as far as I'm concerned it would be just a very expensive and rather useless tool (and one with a limited life too, according to what I read about it a looong time ago on the life of the little screens... did they improve on that? haven't RTFA).

    18. Re:Functionality Display by alienw · · Score: 1

      There is no reason a good quality PS/2 to USB adapter would not support every PC keyboard in existence. The mouse should play no role in this.

    19. Re:Functionality Display by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Yes it would be, but then you run the risk of the keyboard and the app getting out of sync. Not a huge bother, of course, but inelegant; I much prefer things to just work, even if it means that getting them to that state takes more effort.

    20. Re:Functionality Display by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      The website specifically specifies it will be open-sourced and come with an SDK, etc, so there will likely be little problem in getting application support, as long as you have someone willing to sit there and type everything out. Having said that, it will probably be the job of the devteam of the application with most big projects that support keyboard-shortcut changing.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    21. Re:Functionality Display by orangepeel · · Score: 1

      Beyond geek: TTR ... Type Type Revolution?

      --
      Whoever designed level 61 in Frozen Bubble is a sadistic bastard.
    22. Re:Functionality Display by sylvainsf · · Score: 1

      After looking around on their blog a bit I noticed the configurator software for the 3 key model is context sensitive: a different set of images/functions show up when ctrl or open-apple is pressed (the images were from the OSX software).

    23. Re:Functionality Display by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I didn't contradict myself. I said people should use the keyboard, but most of the time they use the mouse. This is basically a 1-1 substitute for being too lazy to memorize the keyboard shortcuts. Besides, how would you even find the stuff you're looking for with this kind of keyboard. Press CTRL, look around for the option you want, not there, then ALT, then CTRL+ALT, then Shift+Ctrl and so on, by the time you find the command, you could have clicked 15 different menus and found it. It's easier just to memorize this in the first place. Here's a much cheaper way to implement the same thing. Hold down control, and a keyboard shows up on your screen, with labels on the keys defining what they do. Then as you learn them, you can disable the feature. With the OLED keyboard, you get the same thing, except once you learn the shortcuts, you're not looking at it any more, and you basically have a $400 keyboard that doesn't do anything more than a $20 keyboard.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    24. Re:Functionality Display by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Maybe future versions of the keyboard will have the brains onboard, instead of in the computer it's connected to. Not only would that probably speed up the refresh rate, but it would also let you play these types of games without that ugly box attached to it.

      Of course, after a certain point, it just becomes a touchscreen with tactile feedback.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    25. Re:Functionality Display by russellh · · Score: 1

      xroach comes to mind...

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    26. Re:Functionality Display by Sky+Cry · · Score: 1

      This could interest you then... optimus_project: OM3 Plays Pong.

  4. Pre-orders start December 12? by Odiumjunkie · · Score: 1

    Where do I start queueing?! Let's hope it works with my PS3! /sarcasm Anyone miss the days when things just "went on sale"?

  5. Keybords by 0racle · · Score: 1

    Is this the thread where we say what we wish we had in a keyboard?

    I really like the keyboard on my MacBook, I wish I could find one like it for my PC's

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:Keybords by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough I like my Microsoft Internet keyboard. The keys don't feel as cheap as other keyboards I have used and when it gets dirty it seems to survive complete submersion in water. Although I admit I have not tried mac keyboards, so I don't know what I am missing.

    2. Re:Keybords by sparrow_hawk · · Score: 1

      The Happy Hacker 2 Lite keyboard is about the closest thing I've found to a Macbook (well, iBook in my case) keyboard for a PC -- most of the keys are in the right places, though I had to remap Control to Caps Lock on my laptop so I didn't get confused every time I switched between the two machines. The HH2 Lite has a pretty decent feel for a membrane keyboard.

    3. Re:Keybords by ahbe · · Score: 1

      Your in luck, check out the icekey keyboard. http://www.macally.com/spec/usb/input_device/iceke y.html

  6. Best use for this... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I suspect that this won't be used a lot on home computer systems. Where it may be used a lot is in things like automotive dashboards and possibly non-critical systems on aircraft where space is at a premium and touch screens work poorly if you're wearing gloves and/or want some tactile feedback.

    -b.

    1. Re:Best use for this... by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what I was thinking when I just saw their upravlator. That thing, although looking unconventional at first, might be a bigger succes than their oled keyboard, especially as it can have direct applications in industries.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    2. Re:Best use for this... by Dracos · · Score: 1

      Any application where the UI is hotkey driven (or has lots of semi-decipherable icons) can benefit from an Optimus.

      Personally, I want one just for Blender. Lots of other graphics apps could benefit from this (Photoshop, even), and certainly there are some video people out there that would like to plug one of these into their Avid systems.

      Sadly, the extra 10 side keys could have been put to good use in a Blender key layout.

    3. Re:Best use for this... by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I hadn't seen that until your link, and I would love a device like that, assuming the price was reasonable.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    4. Re:Best use for this... by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Translation: this keyboard is for pussies that are too thick to learn touch-typing or are lazy enough to remember a few shortcuts.

      And watch out where you brag about your new Optimus: a programmer/graphics designer that cannot touch-type/remeber photoshop shotcuts is not an employee worth keeping.

      One thing missing in this thread is newies bitching about difficulty of Emacs.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    5. Re:Best use for this... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I've heard figures that the shortcuts in those sorts of software number in the hundreds.
      And Emacs is pretty good software, except it's missing a decent text editor.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    6. Re:Best use for this... by Dracos · · Score: 1

      Obviously you've never used Blender, which utilizes about half of the available [key], ctrl-[key], alt-[key], and shift-[key] keystroke combinations, especially the ones that have any sensible mnemonic meaning. G doesn't make sense when you want to Move something, until you associate Grab to the key, which arguably makes more sense than V, which Photoshop uses. Many of Blender's keystrokes even have different functionality based on context.

      There is a keystroke map for Blender, but its innate information overload makes it less usable than those for simpler software like Photoshop.

      In fact, Blender has a reputation for being somewhat hard to learn, mostly based on its tendency to promote the use of keystrokes over wading through a maze of menus. The number of keystrokes required to graduate from noob to novice as a blender user is about half as many keystrokes as there are in all of Photoshop.

      Given the nature of 3d modeling applications, I can't imagine that 3DS Max, Maya, Lightwave, Rhino, or any of the others are much different in this regard. It's not about laziness so much as it is about the complexity of the tool.

    7. Re:Best use for this... by E++99 · · Score: 1

      I think the best market for it is going to be cash register systems.

  7. Can't wait for it to hit mainstream. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    This is the sort of thing that many users would love to get when the pricepoint is right. Both for easy of use (wouldn't you love a keyboard that could change languages at a single click?) and for increased productivity (that photoshop overlay looked pretty slick).

    $400 is over my budget. When it hits $100 it's mine. :-)

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:Can't wait for it to hit mainstream. by maximthemagnificent · · Score: 1

      I see a real opportunity for input devices suych as this to drastically simplify not only
      individual programs, but OS interface as well. Program input can get daunting very
      quickly for users and this could really cut through all that.

      But not at $400, so don't hold your breath.

      I saw a membrane switch equiavlent of this years ago You slipped a printed sheet
      over the buttons that said what they did. Very low-tech and awful buttons, but it
      was all of $20 and I've kicked myself for not grabbing one given the very complcated
      programs I often run. Oh well.

      Maxim

    2. Re:Can't wait for it to hit mainstream. by El_Isma · · Score: 1

      From what I see, the enter key is badly misplaced. It's too damn far away from the home row. You'll have to move quite a bit to reach it. In my keyboard, the enter key is two keys away from the home row, and that's the furthest I've ever seen it. Most other keyboards have it only one key away. This keyboard has it *three* keys away, and down. I have problems typing on those keyboards with slim enter-key... So, for me, great idea, bad design :(

  8. Why release it without the 10 programmable keys? by JesusXP · · Score: 1

    Thats basically the only thing that had us excited in the first place! The first release will be lame without it..

  9. Nice, when the price comes down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The keyboard looks really nice, and would be a cute toy. But, for over $400...(!)

    There are opportunity costs in life, and the cost of this opportunity looks a bit steep. If I spend $400 on a keyboard, then I am giving up the opportunity to spend the same $400 on beer. And really, one must admit that $400 can buy you a lot of beer.

    Hopefully OLED will continue to come down in price, and eventually this sort of keyboard will be available for around $100. At that price, I may be willing to go for it.

  10. Under $400? by kd5ujz · · Score: 1, Interesting

    After looking at the site, the Optimus mini three (three keys) runs for $160USD. I do not see how they can sell 103 keys for $400, when they are selling 3 for $160. I know that the price will get cheaper for the keyboard (still has only one usb controller), but at the 3 for $160 rate, the keyboard with 103 keys would run ~$5493USD. I seriously doubt it will be cheaper than a nice cell phone.

    --
    -William
    God is everything science has yet to explain.
    1. Re:Under $400? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, looks like B&W LCD v.s. color OLED for the time being.

    2. Re:Under $400? by alienw · · Score: 1

      It's called "NRE". Non-recurring expenses. As in, the parts for the keyboard might only cost $50; the rest is the NRE cost of the plastic molds and other tooling, as well as the manufacturing costs. For many electronic products, the bill of materials cost is less than 10% of the retail price.

    3. Re:Under $400? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I belive the the mini helped raise the capital to produce the full sized keybaord.

    4. Re:Under $400? by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

      It's possible that those mini threes were being made by hand on a small scale, perhaps as a means of raising further capital and helping to identify engineering/manufacturing issues. A paid beta test if you will.

      A lot of manufacturing processes get a lot cheaper when automated and scaled into hundreds of thousands of units. While they may not hit $400, I'd bet they can get within a few hundred of that.

      Here's hoping.

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  11. Staggered columns versus matrix keyboards by wikinerd · · Score: 0

    Damn, they created such an innovative keyboard and they destroyed it by using staggered columns. I personally use TypeMatrix (QWERTY and Dvorak) and Plum keyboards that have a matrix layout, similar to the numeric keypad. You have to use one to understand how much better it is. I would definitely buy an Optimus keyboard if it had a matrix layout, but I have no intention to return to a staggered columns layout just for OLED keycaps.

    1. Re:Staggered columns versus matrix keyboards by dattaway · · Score: 1

      I'm glad someone brought up the dvorak layout. This will make switching to dvorak and back family friendly. "One touch dvorak."

    2. Re:Staggered columns versus matrix keyboards by Quarters · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OMG! They "destroyed it" by supporting the keyboard design the overwhelming majority of people are used to instead of supporting a layout that only two companies feel is important. Those bastards.

    3. Re:Staggered columns versus matrix keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, they didn't think to layout support for a worthless sub-section of the market by turning it into Playschool shit. They TOTALLY ruined it! Why didn't those idiots know that they'd sell many more keyboards if they pandered to a keyboard style that NOBODY USES???

      Shut the fuck you up, you moronic cretin. Nobody's impressed by you name-dropping a stupid keyboard configuration.

    4. Re:Staggered columns versus matrix keyboards by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      From the livejournal of the developers:

      Some of the comments on the images published here are really funny. It's like some restaurant would decide to publish chef's thoughts on a new soup receipe, and some folks would look at the process and say, 'Gee, he pours water in! We will never dine here!'

      Reaction in the comments: But this is the internet, why else would you be posting this if not to hear my windbag opinion of how you should run your enterprise?

      :)

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    5. Re:Staggered columns versus matrix keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      OMG! They "destroyed it" by supporting the keyboard design the overwhelming majority of people are used to

      Unfortunately not. If you check the actual keyboard layout for the Optimus 103, shown in this thread http://community.livejournal.com/optimus_project/ (6th comment down I think), you'll find that it doesn't match any commonly used layout. Not US, not European, not Russian. Everyone will find a key missing somewhere.

      Following just one common layout and leaving everyone else to cope, I could understand. Putting in "too many" keys so that a number of common layouts could be essentially emulated, I could understand. Putting in too few for everyone is just stupid.
    6. Re:Staggered columns versus matrix keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Dvorak on all of my personal machines (and Qwerty whenever I use a school or family/friend's computer), and I have never had a desire to physically remap the keys.

    7. Re:Staggered columns versus matrix keyboards by Quarters · · Score: 1

      While your response is interesting it isn't relevant in this branch of the discussion. We were commenting on whether or not the keys should be aligned on a grid of perfect rows & columns or in the more traditional staggered column layout. We weren't discussing where each individual key is located with respect to the keys around it.

  12. Minor question - How much? by slightlyspacey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know about your credit card, but when I charge something, they require something a bit more concrete than "less than the price of a good cell phone".

    1. Re:Minor question - How much? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      I'm sure we'll have another article Dec 22 with an actual price, and yet another when pre-orders become just plain "orders", and probably a review after that.

  13. I'll pass, for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be waiting on the 'Prime' version.

  14. nice eye candy by yagu · · Score: 1

    I like the look, I like the idea... I've waited a long to see these be available... but, around $400???

    At that kind of expense, it better have a 100G drive, about 512M memory, and run Linux. (and for an extra $100 - $200, Windows XP...)

    I know it's new, I know price points start high, I'll wait.

  15. 'less than a good mobile phone' by NineNine · · Score: 0, Troll

    $400 is 'less than a good mobile phone'? Now granted, I'm not a professional consumer like some people are, but what moron pays $400 (or more??) for a phone? Last time I needed a phone, it was either free, or it was like $50. It definitely wasn't more than $100. Are people really dumb enough to pay $400 for a fucking phone?

    1. Re: 'less than a good mobile phone' by grimJester · · Score: 1

      Last time I needed a phone, it was either free, or it was like $50

      Are you aware of what you signed up for? You probably had to use the same network provider for a year or more, at inflated prices.

    2. Re: 'less than a good mobile phone' by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1
      Last time I needed a phone, it was either free or...

      Yeah, right. I think you need to think that over before calling other people dumb.
    3. Re: 'less than a good mobile phone' by Lorkki · · Score: 1
      You probably had to use the same network provider for a year or more, at inflated prices.

      Or he simply got himself a model which doesn't run Linux, play videos, do his laundry and make him coffee while organising his socks and rearranging Beethoven's 5th for the kazoo.

      I don't know much about the situation in the U.S.A., but around here basic models can easily go for under 50 EUR retail.

    4. Re: 'less than a good mobile phone' by Cygfrydd · · Score: 1

      Clearly you've never purchased a cell phone and not signed the next two years of your life away on a contract.

    5. Re: 'less than a good mobile phone' by nra1871 · · Score: 1

      Sign your life away? Good lord what is so hard about reading the details, and getting a contract which suits you?

    6. Re: 'less than a good mobile phone' by RecordHigh · · Score: 1

      I agree that paying $400 for nothing but a basic cell phone would be dumb. However, I believe the original poster was referring to a PDA/Camera/Wi-fi/Bluetooth phone with a full QWERTY keyboard. Paying $400 for a phone like that might be extravagant, but it is definitely not dumb. Dumb would be you for not realizing that.

    7. Re: 'less than a good mobile phone' by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "...but what moron pays $400 (or more??) for a phone?"

      An open-minded moron that wants a Treo.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re: 'less than a good mobile phone' by NineNine · · Score: 1

      No, I've actually had a cell phone for about 10 years. Never paid more than $100 for it, though.

  16. NB: This keyboard does not use OLED. by onemorehour · · Score: 5, Informative

    Read the blog for details. They scrapped the OLED idea in favor of LCD screens to save cost.

    1. Re:NB: This keyboard does not use OLED. by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      "Optimus-103 DC Adapter
      Optimus keyboard will be shipped with a power adapter. Hundred of LEDs beneath the keys cannot be powered by USB alone."

      IMO, that sucks.
      Now you have another cable to plug in and they've ditched one of the neatest things about it.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  17. Imagine how long the lines will be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for an OLED display. The mind boggles.

  18. Yeah but... by Klaidas · · Score: 1

    Does it have drivers for linux?
    No, really

    1. Re:Yeah but... by elFarto+the+2nd · · Score: 1

      Reading their blog, it looks like it'll show up as a mass storage device.

  19. Cool... but functional? by Stinkythe1 · · Score: 0

    I personally would love to own this keyboard, even if it did cost around $400. However, I'm not sure how functional this keyboard would actually be. I mean, how many times do you actually look AT your keyboard. I rarely do, unless i'm peking out number on the top of the keyboard or pressing one of the F keys.

    I think that the only real good function that this keyboard would have would be for training purposes. This keyboard would be EXCELLENT for teaching someone what the keyboard shortcuts are for a certain peice of software, and everyone knows that if you know the keyboard shortcuts for a program, you productivity goes through the roof compared to using the mouse. However, to someone who is very familiar with the software and already knows the keyboard shortcuts, this keyboard would only be useful for a WOW factor, and that would be about it.

  20. Very cool, but.. by doctor+proteus · · Score: 1

    I was kind of hoping for a completely flat, touch sensitive keyboard (think LCARS) so you could completely redesign the key layouts, or even use as a tablet etc...

    Would be great for games as well. Maybe ver 2.0

    1. Re:Very cool, but.. by Twisted64 · · Score: 1

      Those displays are cool, but you'd definitely have to look at the keyboard for a while - it'd be a bit like switching from a guitar to a fretless instrument. Also, where would you rest your fingers when not typing?

      --
      Consciousness is a myth. Trust me.
    2. Re:Very cool, but.. by Slithe · · Score: 1
      Also, where would you rest your fingers when not typing?
      You could rest your hands on the part of the screen that you had designated as a finger rest.
      --
      ---- "XML is like violence. If it doesn't fix the problem, you aren't using enough."
  21. oled keyboard? by unluckier · · Score: 1

    do you really look at your keyboard?: doing always the same thing, you already know where the keys are ( i hope you know the quake keys if you're playing quake :/). Do you need a flashing 'COPY' when hitting ctrl + c ?

    But of course, it's pretty cool to have a keyboard like that.. I wouldn't mind..

  22. Fast food joints rejoice! by Ruvim · · Score: 1

    Adding new menu items to McDonald's cash register will never be easier!

  23. Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    huh? The squishy feeling is a good thing(tm) Its called a quiet keyboard. I very much dislike the spring keyboards, esp if yo use them for data entry. With quiet keyboards its much easier to press the keys.

    Although ultimately it comes down to personal preference, I think that the 'clicky' buckling-spring keys are actually easier to use and less fatiguing. Because there is immediate tactile and audible feedback when the key-switch is actuated, you don't have to press it as far down. When I use a 'soft touch' keyboard, I find that I hit the keys further and harder, because there's not that feedback; I slam each key all the way down instead of (with practice) only pushing each key down as far as is necessary.

    The noise of the original IBM Model M's is definitely a downside; if you have to work around other people, I can see how it wouldn't win you many friends. In my opinion, the Apple Extended Keyboard II with the Altus switches is the best of both worlds. It's softer both in terms of pressure and sound than the IBM, but it's not as 'mushy' as a soft-touch (silicone dome).

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by ben+there... · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I hate the sound of keyboards, especially in computer labs or busy offices. My perfect keyboard would provide no tactile feedback at all. Just touch-sensitive with some "mushiness" or "give", so that your fingers aren't pressing against a hard surface. Include a tiny speaker (or use the computer's sound card) for key press sounds for those that want them. You could even use headphones for it if you ran through the sound card. Silent to all around you. The best feedback is the letters appearing on the screen anyway.

    2. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by kefler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "The best feedback is the letters appearing on the screen anyway."

      You must type rather slowly...

    3. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by ben+there... · · Score: 1
      "The best feedback is the letters appearing on the screen anyway."

      You must type rather slowly...

      At least 35wpm. Haven't checked recently. Computer has no problem keeping up with that though.
    4. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by amazon10x · · Score: 1
      At least 35wpm. Haven't checked recently. Computer has no problem keeping up with that though.
      You do know that is really slow, right?
    5. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by ben+there... · · Score: 1

      Actually its about 50 wpm according to this. Faster if I'm not transcribing something like in these tests. As I said, I hadn't tested recently.

    6. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by ben+there... · · Score: 1

      BTW, according to wikipedia (and a few other sites), average WPM is about 30-45 wpm, so no that is not "really slow."

    7. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Deviant+Q · · Score: 1

      For someone in the computer industry, that's really slow.

      --
      "May the days be aimless. Let the seasons drift. Do not advance the action according to a plan."
    8. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by ben+there... · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What's yours? Honestly, if all you people are going to do is talk about my 50 wpm typing speed, then it is offtopic at best. I've never had a minimum wage data entry job, so sue me.

      (Hint: reply to my original post about keyboards to be on-topic)

    9. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by kryptkpr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I get ~130WPM gross, ~115 WPM net on that test. Your 50wpm may seem fast by normal standards, but it's glacially slow by "slashdot" (programmer) standards. Programmers need to type in dozens of lines of code to express a single idea sometimes, and if you do that every day for a few years it really improves your typing speed (and accuracy).

      My only contribution to this discussion is the best keyboard is the keyboard that you're used to, and it's as simple as that. If you are used to that annoying clicky feeling and sound, then that's what you will like.

      Personally, I hate it. I hit the keys on those damn springy keyboards way harder (it seems like the keys actually travels further, and my fingers tend to travel with the keys) then I'd normally hit on a rubber-membrane keyboard, which makes it difficult for me to move to the next key and as a result I type slower and less accurately.

      I know people who are proficient at such keyboards don't allow their fingers to travel with the key, they move on when they feel they've just passed the threshold and let the key hit the bottom on it's own.. but that's been learned over a period of years. If the vocal minority who love clicky keyboards had spent the same amount of time on using a rubber membrane keyboard already, their typing would have adjusted to suit and they could quit complaining about the state of keyboards these days.

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    10. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      A java applet for testing the speed of a serial process. Something deeply ironic about that.

      I'm at 56 WPM on a clickety Apple II style keyboard, and 48 on my Powerbook G4 keyboard, though of course it can't be too scientific a conclusion.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    11. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      That's still quite slow.
      I took the "Strategic alliances with Competitors" test and scored 90 wpm gross / 78 wpm net.

      Needless to say I can't type as fast on anything but a model M.
      Nothing like a buckling spring to get into the "flow"...

    12. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

      Speaking of WPM counts is there any freeware Windows based software where I can check my typing speed?

    13. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Metasquares · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Programming ability depends on typing speed about as much as IQ depends on how quickly you write or mathematical ability depends on how quickly you can do arithmetic (that is, the relation is very slight). A programmer who can express the same idea with less code doesn't have to type as much, after all.

      (I type in the range of 80-110 WPM at 90% accuracy, before this becomes an attack on my typing as well :) )

      the best keyboard is the keyboard that you're used to
      Agreed!
    14. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      You do know that is really slow, right?


      And you know that it's all relative anyway, right? 35WPM is slow for a trained touch typist, but it's still fast compared to the speed a lot of people type...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    15. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by kryptkpr · · Score: 2, Informative

      My statement was simply that Programmers, on average, type faster then the general populace. I stand by this statement, but it is a one-way implication (and not at all a correlation).

      So while being a programmer implies a faster average typing speed, I am in full agreement with you that having a faster average typing speed implies nothing (and least of all programming ability, it might just mean you spent months blabbing on IM to your buddies).

      To all those people who are saying use a better language, you're either developing only software and/or not getting paid to write code.

      If you're being paid, you code in what you're told to code, no matter how ugly the syntax. But at least you get to go home and write code in whatever beautiful language you prefer (mmm .. Python)..

      If you're developing hardware, your choice comes down to Verilog or VHDL. VHDL (1993) especially is defined in such a way as to make massive amounts of typing (not to mention copy/pasting) inescapable. Keywords like CONV_STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (21 fucking characters for the most commonly used type-conversion function!) show up all over the place. It makes you type out "BEGIN" and "END".. no braces. Even a "simple" digital logic block such as a 4-to-1 MUX or a slight variation there-of can require a dozen lines of stupid, pointless syntax (so that it 'looks' like a MUX to the compiler) to implement .. no matter how good of a programmer you are.

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    16. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I get ~130WPM gross

      I'm not calling BS, but consider me skeptical. The fastest /sustained/ speeds recorded are 150WPM for /natural language/ on a Dvorak keyboard (usually estimated to be at least 10-15% faster for proficient use).

      If you're going to claim that you're able to /code/ programmatic syntax at 130WPM (and what is a 'word' in such a circumstance, anyway), on a QWERTY keyboard, I'd be rather surprised, to put it mildly.

    17. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not going to make that claim. The 130WPM figure was my average "gross" (ignoring any errors of which there were I think around 8%) speed at transcribing a portion of "The Wizard of Oz" using the not-so-scientific Java typing test posted by the GP.

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    18. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      Studies on the project-o-keyboards that use infrared to detect keystrokes say otherwise. The feedback you get from tapping whatever surface you're projecting onto is less than that of a traditional keyboard, and the figure I remember is 20wpm slower. Personally, I hate typing on laptop keyboards because the keys, apart from being to near to one another also have very little travel. I'm not sure whether this is the same phenomenon, or my simply being accustomed to typing on a keyboard with more give in the keys.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    19. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by dulridge · · Score: 1

      Agreed entirely! The noise is a pain but tolerable - when I did CS in the late 70's the noise of a hundred or so teletypes was quite something. Admittedly that wasn't the keyboards but...

      I ive alone so the Model M noise doesn't bother me at all, but the most durable keyboard I've ever had (given that I smoke a lot) was an original Apple Extended that lived for about 14 years on a solid diet of ash and whatever else...

      I like Model M keyboards a lot, but you still can't beat the Extended II for durability under extremely adverse conditions, i.e., my fingers.

      I learned to type many years ago in an African desert on a sand-filled manual typewriter, so I tend to beat keyboards to death with my fingers. Only Model M's and decent Apple keyboards can take the abuse that my fingers dish out. My record for keyboard destruction is under an hour (When I was writng up a PhD) on a real cheapo piece of garbage. Silicone dome keyboards don't live long here.

      Thus far, the Apple USB keyboards (of which I own quite a few) just don't have the life of the old Exended II, but I do like them. I only use Model M's for the Linux/Winders boxen around here. Thus far, I've destroyed 2 Compaq (membrane) keyboards for the antiques at work - my "new" box is a P3.

      Long live the Model M! And all such older, but really nice keyboardds.

    20. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Actually typing speed is a rather good measure of how good the programmer is.
      I have yet to see a good programmer who cant type quickly.

      Practice makes perfect and programmers get a awful lot of typing practice.

    21. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by ben+there... · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let's see: average programmer in the US in 2001 produced 6200 lines of code per year, according to Gartner.

      6200 lines/year * 10 words/line = 62000 words/year

      62000 words/year / 1080 hours/year = 57 words/hour

      57 words/hour / 60 mins/hour = 1 wpm

      Apparently, considering no coder types at anywhere near 1 wpm, writing code is bottlenecked by thinking, not typing.

    22. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be a jerk. I see countless people who must look at the keyboard rather than the screen; some of them only use their index fingers... that's "really slow". 35 is moderate; 65+ is fast. If you type faster than that, you're on the computer much more than average. Supposedly the bare minimum for secretaries is 40, if my high school typing workshop memories serve correct... so no, 35+ isn't "really slow".

      My peak typing speed is at least 100 WPM (probably faster considering things like coffee and deadlines), but I find that half the time I'm staring off into nowhere with my mind's eye while trying to think of how I want to construct my sentence/command/line of code/etc. and probably still average down there in the 30s, with 1+ second(s) in between words.

      Then there's dada21, who, judging from the size of his first research reports (err, I mean first posts) must have a 200+ WPM typing speed with literally perfect accuracy... or is a Slashdot "fraud" with prewritten first-post copy, or something like that. :)

      Incidentally, I absolutely LOVE those old IBM keyboards that click loudly. In a computer lab full of them, the sound is soothing to me... when they're new, they have that gritty texture on them - I like when they get all smoothed out & refined and you can't even read the letters on the keys anymore. I wish they made a wireless one with multimedia controls...

    23. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but you fail to take into account the bursty nature of programming. There are times when a problem requires 3 days of thinking, but only a relatively minor amount of code to implement the solution when you have it. During that implementation phase, typing is the bottleneck, not thinking.

      PS: Cranking out generic php-mysql database GUI code, which I did for months, is typing bottlenecked at all times.
      PPS: I also produced ~10k lines of code in 3 months last year... maybe it's because I'm Canadian?

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    24. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Neil+Hodges · · Score: 1

      C-style programming has very little concern over the 'words-per-minute' issue, since much of the structure is comprised of non-word strings. How about how many consecutive characters per minute?

    25. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by espressojim · · Score: 1
      Programmers need to type in dozens of lines of code to express a single idea sometimes, and if you do that every day for a few years it really improves your typing speed (and accuracy).


      I've found that while my typing speed isn't bad after 6 years of professional programming, my use of an IDE to do the heavy lifting forces my keystrokes to be pretty short.

      Example: If I want a BufferedReader, I type Bu[control-space] and usually get it. If I want a variable name, one or two letters is usually enough (short methods = not too many variables in local scope.) Lots of other functions work about the same way. So, if you counted the number of letters or lines of code, it would look high, but that's just because I'm letting something else do the work.

      I'm a decent typed, but those few years I spent on IRC constantly in the early 90's are probably what most honed my typing skills...Of course, that didn't teach me how incredibly important [({})] are...
    26. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      I'm in a bad spot there at the moment;

      My home keyboard shorted out, and I'm stuck with this wireless garbage-board with laptop-style keys and a space-bar that isn't quite as responsive as the rest of the keys.

      Meanwhile, I've switched offices at work and the keyboard there has this weird setup for the home-end block of six, they're all vertical, and I keep accidentally pressing shift-delete when I mean shift-home. Makes coding a hell of a chore.

      *hates it*

      Meanwhile, I'm getting an optimus - just after christmas; I hope to reap a post-christmas price reduction. If I like it, I'll get another one for work, just for consistency. Like I do with my mouse.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    27. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      There's a Firefox extension. It's called Addictive Typing Lessons, but it doesn't actually give lessons.

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    28. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by QuesarVII · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need to implement yourself a simple preprocessor for the code then. Even something as simple as

      sed -e 's/{/BEGIN/' -e 's/}/END/' -e 's/C_S_L_V/CONV_STD_LOGIC_VECTOR/g'

      will make those 3 examples far easier to enter. Just maintain your code with your own preprocessor shorthand and run it through your simple preprocessor step to test or release it.

    29. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      I've actually settled on Macros (so CONV_STD_LOGIC_VECTOR is a key combination away) and a text editor with Syntax-completion (so if I start a PROCESS construct, it fills in BEGIN END for me).

      Having to run all of your source files through an intermediate tool before you can compile them is a bit too much.. I would be too tempted to implement new language features, and end up chasing more bugs in my code generators then my code itself.

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    30. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      There is a middle ground. My primary board is an older Dell keyboard with mechanical keyswitches. They feel like a lightweight version of the model M. The keyboard is solid, with two layers of fairly low gauge metal inside (it could easily be used as a blunt weapon; the skull would give before the board) but the keys are about half volume from the IBM keyboard. I wonder if it uses the same 'Altus' switches that you describe. Whatever is in there, I love it, and I easily type 10-15WPM faster on it than on any membrane keyboard.

    31. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by McFadden · · Score: 1
      My perfect keyboard would provide no tactile feedback at all. Just touch-sensitive with some "mushiness" or "give", so that your fingers aren't pressing against a hard surface.

      Clive Sinclair...? Is that you...?

    32. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 1

      A word is typically considered to be eight characters.

      While I have a rather glacial 40 WPM, my good friend from high school can type at a confirmed 115 WPM with better than 99% accuracy. He can go a bit faster than this but his accuracy begins to suffer. He wears out a keyboard in about 18 months. My mother can cruise at well over 100 WPM as well.

      You're right though, 130 WPM is a remarkable speed for simple raw transcription. To be able to code at that speed would be truly mind-boggling and I would even dare say worth seeing in person. When I code it's usually periods of thinking and jotting punctuated by short fits of typing. It must be nice to have kryptkpr's savant-like coding skillz, but I'm perfectly happy with having to think before I type.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    33. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1
      "The best feedback is the letters appearing on the screen anyway."

      You must type rather slowly...
      perhaps you need a new pc? even just mashing the keyboard in vim on this old powerbook causes no trouble, with letters appearing on the screen as they are mashed
      --
      TIAEAE!
    34. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Eivind · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Uhm, no. That'd be "data-entry monkeys". The average programmer productivity is not dependant on typing-speed at all, and less so the more challenging the project is. The trick in programming ain't typing quickly, but typing the *correct* stuff.

      Brooks in his Mythical Man Month has a good discussion of programmer-productivity in a large project. Average programmer-output is something like 100 lines of code a *day*.

      If you're hammering out massive amounts of trivial code where the limiting factor is your typing-speed, you are doing something wrong. Probably, you should think about the problem at hand 10 times as much, and write only 1/10th as much code.

    35. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Flibz · · Score: 1

      Loadsssssssssssssssssssssssss

      (Those s's took mere seconds!)

    36. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Unique2 · · Score: 1

      I find the major difference is that if I do a key mash (accidentally hit 2 keys at once) using a keyboard with a good mechanical feedback I am already heading towards the backspace key as I know (possibly even subconsciously) which keys will have registered. Using a squishy keyboard I need to wait on my relatively slow eyes to process if both, one or neither keys registered.

      --
      No trees were harmed in the posting of this message. However, a great number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
    37. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Hawkxor · · Score: 1

      It gets exponentially more difficult based on the rate that the brain can send muscle instructions, after a certain point. 150 is an order of magnitude harder than 130, and 160 would be an order of magnitude beyond that. Furthermore, online test in question uses pretty common English. I just took the test and was at 140 wpm with 98% accuracy (obviously, I am a very good typer - but it's not so rare).

    38. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by somersault · · Score: 1

      hence the letters appearing on the screen is good feedback. My laptop now has the w and s keys missing (I've not even played many FPSes on it, honest... more like hitting ctrl-s when coding etc, and ctrl-w when closing FF windows :p ), and the letters appearing on the screen is pretty decent feedback. But if I was typing full speed and didn't have to worry about the w and s appearing then I guess knowing I've pressed the key is a good feedback :S was getting about 60WPM with this crappy laptop keyboard and 2 broken keys -.-

      --
      which is totally what she said
    39. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by somersault · · Score: 1

      if only I had mod points.. *laughs some more*

      --
      which is totally what she said
    40. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by anothy · · Score: 1
      Programmers need to type in dozens of lines of code to express a single idea sometimes...
      ...and then there's APL, where you need dozens of ideas to get to a single line.
      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    41. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, if you want to keep in the spirit of this keyboard's design, the audible "click" feedback should be programmable -- on a key by key basis.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    42. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by clydemaxwell · · Score: 1

      backspace twice out of habit. backspace twice and hit the correct key, still faster than visually analysing the result.

      --
      Browsing with classic discussion, noscript, at -1 and nested
      no hidden comments and I only mod UP
    43. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by QuesarVII · · Score: 1

      It doesn't need to be an intermediate step. Just create your own compiler name and have it do the conversion before passing it off to the actual compiler.

    44. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by xiong.chiamiov · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't play any games... Getting your ubermicro on without being able to feel anything is a tad bit hard.

    45. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      VHDL (1993) especially is defined in such a way as to make massive amounts of typing (not to mention copy/pasting) inescapable.

      The answer, of course, is to write a code generator. Writing a parser for round-tripping is difficult but, to me at least, so is typing hideous standard package names.

      You know, back in the early eighties, the most advanced EDA systems were built in Lisp using Lisp machines. Oddly enough, the simple syntax of the language made round-tripping simple and the macro generation facilities made it quite simple to write hardware generators. It is much more difficult to do this work in VHDL. Maybe it's time to go back to the future.

      Of course, we'll probably settle for System C or some other such dreck, that will be easier to type, but still will be hard to round-trip or generate.

      --
      That is all.
    46. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by kefler · · Score: 1

      Well I suppose most of my work typing is in a gvim xwindow across a network with 20-30ms latency. But even at home generally I am connected via network to another computer and using it that way.. I just use laptops as the wireless terminal.

    47. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by glsunder · · Score: 1

      writing code is bottlenecked by thinking, not typing.

      maybe they need a bigger neck.

    48. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      ah, a fair point I guess.

      --
      TIAEAE!
    49. Re:Buckling springs have ergonomic advantages. by Raenex · · Score: 1
      Computer has no problem keeping up with that though.

      If you're taking the time to register with your brain that the key has appeared on the screen before typing the next key, you're moving really slow. I look at the screen too, but it in no way effects how hard I press the keys. By the time I notice an error on screen, I'm already several characters past it.

      But having said that, I prefer the "new", mushy keyboards. They feel much nicer to me.

  24. You're not supposed to look at the keyboard by Animats · · Score: 1

    You're not supposed to look at the keyboard. It slows down your typing.

    Learn to type on a blank keyboard.

    1. Re:You're not supposed to look at the keyboard by FORTRANslinger · · Score: 1

      I just pissed my pants. Take a $20 keyboard, scrub the print off the keys and sell it for $90. What fucking morons buy this shit?

      --
      I'm looking over the wall; and the're looking at me!
    2. Re:You're not supposed to look at the keyboard by jadobbins · · Score: 1

      Alright, that is freaking amazing, I almost want one but I already type rediculously fast and without looking. These should be in use in every public school though.

      --
      "There is no Honor, without Pie."
      -Weeble
    3. Re:You're not supposed to look at the keyboard by jadobbins · · Score: 1
      It's okay, calm down, just take a breath and do a little research. If you actually read the information on the Das keyboard website, you would see that it isn't a $20.00 keyboard with no letters on the keys. $20.00 keyboards are $20.00 because they use rubber membranes to make contact with the circuit board. This keyboard is more expensive because the keys use "Gold-plated key switches". that are supposed to increase responsiveness and durability.

      So in answer to your question "What fucking morons buy this shit?" All of the "fucking morons" that need more responsive, longer-lasting "shit".

      --
      "There is no Honor, without Pie."
      -Weeble
    4. Re:You're not supposed to look at the keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't spell, though.

    5. Re:You're not supposed to look at the keyboard by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      ...Why does it need to be gold-plated? That seems kinda useless.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    6. Re:You're not supposed to look at the keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, it's a $50 keyboard with no letters on the keys, Cherry G80

    7. Re:You're not supposed to look at the keyboard by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      I've used one of these, and trust me, it ain't a $20 keyboard. More like a $89.95 keyboard.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    8. Re:You're not supposed to look at the keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does it need to be gold-plated? That seems kinda useless.

      Gold doesn't oxidize like copper does. Oxidizing makes lousy contacts.

    9. Re:You're not supposed to look at the keyboard by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      There are cheaper metals that don't oxidize.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    10. Re:You're not supposed to look at the keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold is commonly used for contacts on for example plug-in expansion cards, and has been for as long as I can remember, without any hoopla or drawing attention to the fact.

  25. I will be moderated down but.. by KeepQuiet · · Score: 1

    What is the hype? Isn't it just a keyboard? OK OK, it is cool, LCDs etc. but $400+ for a keyboard? But then I am not rich.

  26. E-Paper keys? by gaspar+ilom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OLEDs are cool and all, and support color...

    But if they used e-paper for each key, couldn't this be used in laptops and other low-power devices?

    1. Re:E-Paper keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah. I mean, e-paper would be so much more energy efficient than, uh, a regular keyboard. Oh wait.

      Keyboards should have NOTHING on the key tops! It is neither efficient nor ergonomic to be looking at the keys while you are typing. Head up, look at the screen, use touch typing, and spend a tiny fraction of the time you spend at a keyboard to make less mistakes and you will be a maverick typist in no time.

      Talk about the right technology for the wrong problem.

    2. Re:E-Paper keys? by alexhard · · Score: 1

      why the hell was that modded funny? O_O

      --
      Infinite time means everything that can happen, will. You being you is absolutely incidental. You do not exist.
    3. Re:E-Paper keys? by teknognome · · Score: 1
      Keyboards should have NOTHING on the key tops! It is neither efficient nor ergonomic to be looking at the keys while you are typing. Head up, look at the screen, use touch typing, and spend a tiny fraction of the time you spend at a keyboard to make less mistakes and you will be a maverick typist in no time.
      While that's nice in theory, there's plenty of people who do things where where the keys are mapped to different functions than normal. If you only use a program only occasionally, it'd be nice to have the keyboard tell you what CTRL/ALT+a key does, instead of spending the time to look through some helpfile. Or if you're using international keyboard layouts only occasionally (which happens for me, being a linguistics student and needing to type things in a variety of other languages), it'd be nice to not have to look up the keyboard layout, or sit there trying most the keys. There are plenty of uses where learning to touchtype just isn't worth the effort.
    4. Re:E-Paper keys? by stunt_penguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This type of keyboard has little to do with typing, and more to do with keyboard shortcuts and custmisablity.

      As an example of how useful a KB like this is for multimedia developers, have a look at these keyboards and accessoris; they're an intuitive but sometimes expensive way to have your shortcuts laid out in front of you for just one application. With a keyboard like the Optimus, users can apply schemes that change between apps, or that even change when you hold down the CTRL, CTRL-ALT, or CTRL-ALT-SHIFT keys on the keyboard.

      It'd even be useful for novice users getting used to the usual cut/copy/paste routine, or might for example teach them about the uses of the windows key; [win]-d for desktop, [win]-L to log off.

      The potential gaming uses are there, too, I suppose. The killer app for the Optimus(within the gaming world) is perhaps a flight sim, where you have 300-400 keyboard shortcuts at your command ( I'm not joking ) and learning the most useful ones is a real pain in the ass.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    5. Re:E-Paper keys? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Talk about the right technology for the wrong problem.

      With this keyboard, you will have the choice of having a completely blank keyboard or a labelled keyboard.

      I can't wait to see what people will do with this keyboard - like having a giant "DON'T PANIC" message going
      all away across the keyboard, or even the BSOD. Perhaps even games like Pong or Breakout.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:E-Paper keys? by bdsd76 · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to art. lebedev, they chose not to go with e-paper due to its being too slow...

    7. Re:E-Paper keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, and I'm not trying to be elitist, but this should be an onscreen cue, not one on the keyboard. Hold down CTRL and maybe you'll get a list of commands that start with CTRL overlaid on your display down the top, bottom, left or right part of the screen. This could even be contextualized for the current application as it would have to be for the Optimus keyboard to begin with.

      So sorry, even if people need help learning short cuts they should not be looking at the keyboard. Also, I do not see how using the Optimus keyboard is any different than binding a command to an F-key or key combination on a normal keyboard which gamers and multimedia artists have been doing for decades already.

      As for fancy input devices, they do have their place, but the Optimus is just another keyboard. It doesn't have a fine grained jog wheel or a particularly accessible button layout like these specialized devices do. And for gamers, the only game I can think of where the player has time to be lost in keyboard commands is The Sims and for that you only need the mouse. Otherwise you better memorize those commands fast; if you need to look down it's not a shortcut anymore.

    8. Re:E-Paper keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree... it'd be awsome if uses of the windows key were listed you know - opening a terminal, and closing a terminal, and resizing a terminal, and moving a terminal, switching desktops etc.

    9. Re:E-Paper keys? by stunt_penguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where exactly do you see a place for your contextual list of commands that start with CTRL on this interface.

      This was my interface just before I checked my mail. I'm running at 1680*1050 on a 24" Dell and I barely, barely have room for everything (I'd be running at 1080p but my video card hasn't got a big enough frame buffer).

      Keyboard shortcuts and the means to remember (or quickly refrence) them are a fact of life, and solve numerous interface problems. You'd be making the same type of baseless argument if you suggested that the GUI is the only means that we should be able to interface with the computer, or that the console should be the only means of issuing system commands.

      The optimus *is* different because it puts the shortcuts right there, and allows immediate customisation of those shortcuts. It beats the heck out of any type of F-Keys or alternate bindings, and is a whole lot better than sticker sets (I've spent enough of my life sticking on labels with tweezers, thanks very much).

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    10. Re:E-Paper keys? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Keyboards should have NOTHING on the key tops!
      Nothing prevents you from configuring the Optimus keyboard to display nothing at all on the keytops...
    11. Re:E-Paper keys? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      How about common sense? Why pay a million dollars for this keyboard when you could just scratch off the letters on any other keyboard.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    12. Re:E-Paper keys? by GeffDE · · Score: 1

      Because scratching the letters off of any other keyboard doesn't let you do nearly the range of things you can do with the Optimus.

      --
      It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
    13. Re:E-Paper keys? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1
      Head up, look at the screen, use touch typing, and ...

      Sure, that works if you're typing in your native language/alphabet. Try learning/typing arabic, cyrillic, hebrew, or even typing on a French keyboard (where'd my "/" key go?!?) when you only type it occasionally and/or you're learning the language.

      It's a real bitch.

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    14. Re:E-Paper keys? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Where exactly do you see a place for your contextual list of commands that start with CTRL on this interface.[?]

      There's thousands of grey pixels spare down the bottom left!!! :p

      I like the Optimus just for being so damn cool. I have no need for the icons really, though I think it really would be useful for flight sims or when just getting used to the keys in new games.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    15. Re:E-Paper keys? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is what I see as the most useful feature out in the real world where people speak more than one language; you change your language and the key caps change. It could work with changing your keymap too, so when you switch to dvorak, it comes up. I'd like to learn dvorak, it would be a nice aid.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are people really dumb enough to pay $400 for a fucking phone?

    There's never been a shortage of dumb people. If the marketing is good enough, it'll sell.

  28. Burn-in by acedotcom · · Score: 0

    i just dont know alot about OLED but will it burn an image into the keys? that wouldnt be good...but you could have some pretty sweet screen savers on KEYBOARD!

    --
    they say it is often more relevant then the comment above, all we know is its called the Sig!
  29. I wonder if this keyboard... by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    Could help bring Dvorak more into the mainstream?

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  30. Interesting. by Windwraith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since I need to exchange keyboard setups (from Spanish (Spain setup) to English to Japanese and others at times, I can see usefulness in this thing. Looks flashy too, although looks like it's rather expensive.
    I wonder if it works in Linux, too?

  31. Great for VM users with deep pockets by mccalli · · Score: 1

    I can imagine this being nice to have if you're a heavy user of virtual machines. For example, I run OS X. It would be nice to have a standard OS X layout, then switch to a Windows install in Parallels and have the keyboard switch to having a Windows key. Then switch to Ubuntu and see a Gnome-like foot for the menu. Or KDE and have a big K, or...

    You get the idea. Price is somewhat hefty though, especially for something that isn't going to have the side keys. I'll wait until I read reviews about how well it feels before I consider splashing out the daft quantities of cash required. Don't get the wrong idea, I wish them well. I'm just not going to be pre-ordering, that's all.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  32. Bloomberg by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    Have they spoken with Bloomberg about this? They already remap keys (by ordering custom keyboards in all sorts of funky colors) and it causes no end of confusion among a portion of their users who can't find the delete key any more (it's labeld CONN/DFLT (in big upper case) delete (in lower case) on their keyboard). This seems like the best of both worlds. And Bloomberg has plenty to drop a few hundred more on their systems. They've been shipping wireless keyboard/flat screen sets for at least 5 years and the latest keyboard has a print scanner.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  33. Optimus Prime? by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Did anyone else notice that the model numbers are primes?

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
  34. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Contrarians are too tiresome. All the smug dvorak twits are doomed to forever live in obscurity.

  35. Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did they have to fuck up the enter key...

  36. I've never really understood the obsession by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With the old IBM keyboards. There seems to be this kind of reverence for them on /. and I don't understand why. I used to have one (had an IBM desktop). It was noisy and hard to press the keys. I much prefer my current MS keyboard which has easy, quiet keys. The only potential argument I've heard for the old keyboards is durability. Ok, maybe so, but what kind of stress do you subject them to that makes them break? I have, thus far, never managed to wear out a key on a keyboard. I use the hell out of my computer too, it's pretty much all I do with my time.

    So what's the deal with the old IBM keyboards? Is it just some kind of geek-tough guy thing? "Back in my day our keyboards could cause hearing damage and by god we liked it!" I just don't understand what the problem with modern, soft, quiet keyboards is. They don't seem to have problems with breaking even under heavy use, so what's up?

    1. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      I think the preference comes from two things, durability and a preference for a loud click, to some people it just seems more substantial. Ego may play a part as well. Keyboard durability is somewhat of a concern though, I've broken probably half a dozen keyboards in the past 5 or so years, and of all varieties, not just soft-touch membrane keyboards, but a couple of regular switch keyboards (one IBM style, one not).

    2. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I don't like modern membrane keyboards because if you spill a drink on them, they're basically done for. You can take them apart and clean the plastic sheets all you want, but it's next to impossible to make all the keys work ever again.

      That being said, I use them at home and at work because I haven't seen an MS Natural-style keyboard with real switches, let alone one at an affordable price.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    3. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubber dome technology has come a long way to emulate buckling spring technology in feel. Most of the bad press for quiet keyboards comes from either foam-and-foil or membrane style keyboards. These are cheaper to produce than rubber dome keyboards and still sneak into ultra inexpensive keyboards today. They are also quieter and often carry the "quiet" designation. Foam-and-foil and membrane keyboards are notorious for having a short key travel and squishy tactile response which is infuriating for touch typists. Membrane keyboards on laptops are unacceptable to me for the most part. Foam-and-foil also has a problem where the foam can relatively quickly deteriorate so that the foil no longer makes full contact and keystrokes are not registered reliably.

      Most touch typists simply say the ideal is the buckling spring keyboard if quiet means foam-and-foil or membrane. But rubber dome has come a very long way, and a high quality rubber dome keyboard can meet the demands of the most exacting keyboard snobs. The problem is the inconsistency of what you get when you start looking at "quiet" keyboards. A mechanical keyswitch keyboard is pretty much going to be good no matter what. Your Cherry or IBM keyboard is going to be reliable and happy. A "quiet" keyboard is very hit or miss in my experience. Sometimes the cheap shit is so unbearably squishy and unresponsive you can't believe the engineers could live with themselves for designing it. Even different keyboards from the same company will have completely levels of tactile response. And for laptops that is almost always the case with me. I blew through two laptop keyboards in less than a year and after that I said fuck it. The portability is absolutely not worth the elevated blood pressure from all this frustration.

      So I guess to answer your question, the whole obsession about IBM keyboards is not that they're somehow magical. It's that it's pretty much an ideal keyboard. They are very consistent from one keyboard to the next to deliver that ideal typing feel. And there are a decent number of them out there that were produced for years and years. That and they don't have any of those bullshit music playback, volume scroll wheel, email idiot buttons that people who use computers to get shit done think are for people with mild mental deficiencies. Even if I found a nice Logitech blah blah keyboard that I liked and could live with all the stupid bullshit decorating it (which I have done before), I probably wouldn't be able to buy that same model in another year (which I have tried and failed to do before). And so begins the long trail and error period of looking for another acceptable cheapo keyboard. Because I know I've looked at five such cheap keyboards (and by cheap I mean construction, not price; these companies have found ways to make people pay $100 for that crap if it has blue LEDs and new Office 12 buttons on it) all in a row from the same company and all completely different key feels. WTF? I'll just pay $50-$100 for a good keyboard with no bullshit that I know will work for me rather that deal with this crap.

    4. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by vistic · · Score: 1

      I personally like the click of my 104-key Unicomp buckling spring keyboard... it's not too loud at all I think.

      Aside from the feel of the keys, I also like the shape of the keys themselves and the layout... it's just the sort of standard my fingers have gotten used to over the years. Some membrane keyboards are ok, but others have a really mushy feel to them that I hate.

      Also, IBM did make a quiet buckling-spring keyboard as well. I think it was the same buckling spring mechanism but with sort of a vaseline-like substance in the spring cavity to absorb any noise.

    5. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by espilce · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it's something akin to the preference of vinyl recordings over CD or other digital methods. Purely a personal aesthetic. I love my keyboard taken from an IBM PS/2 gas station server. I've had it for 10 years now and the thing was made in 1986. I dread the day when I may have to purchase another desktop keyboard. For me, even Apple or Happy Hacking keyboards don't come close to the nice springy click of the IBM PS/2 board.

      --
      :q!
    6. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder the same thing. personally, i love keyboards with very little travel such as the one on a powerbook. i type at around 60 wpm, which is plenty fast enough for me. the only thing i can think of is that the guys who love the mechanical keyboards grew up on typewriters and have exagerated finger strength or something.

    7. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by empaler · · Score: 1

      I remember spilling my first (and so far, only) coke into a keyboard. I was very young at the time, and it was a reverent 8086... I jumped up, pulled out the power from the plug, and spent a lot of time drying the keyboard. Not expecting to be able to ever use the keyboard again, I plugged it all in... and it worked. Not a dead key, not even a sticky one.

    8. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by dubbreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a pianist I enjoy the feel of the buckling spring keyboards, although I haven't owned one in years. I might compare it to the difference between a classic piano and a electronic substitue: there's an intricate tactical sensation when playing on an acoustic piano due to the mechanics. But that may be going to far on drawing a parallel. I also find that I can't type as fast with some of the squishy quiet keyboards. There is an exact point at which the key is pressed that I can recognize with the old clicky keyboards that is consistent, while with the squishy ones I am never sure if I hit it right.. something like that. Of course now I rarely play a real piano and rarely used a clicky keyboard, so it may just be nostalgia. There's a lot to be said for tactile feel though, I love the feeling of putting a minidisk into a player, or a 3.5" floppy into a drive.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    9. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      I have used a lot of rubber dome keyboards where the keys got sticky (wouldn't come back up after pressing, esp. the spacebar), or where the keys got unresponsive. That is one of the most frustrating things to me when typing. I'm not sure what use these were put through, because they weren't mine (school machines). I've never used a Model M which had either of these problems (except for when I screwed up my first model M through stupidity, and water literally corroded away a couple of the traces on the internal membranes).

      Also, the loud click reinforces the feeling of the key moving, so that you know much more certainly (albeit subconsciously) that the key has been pressed. This knowing of the key press is also reinforced by the feeling of the key, where the force increases up to a certain point (as you move the key down), and then suddenly drops down to near zero (as the spring buckles). The way the switch is designed, that buckling point is simultaneous with the keypress being detected by the board. Once you've passed the buckling point, there is no way in heaven or on earth that you can prevent the keypress from registering. Unless of course the board is screwed up and it won't register no matter what. The buckling point also coincides exactly with the audible click. So you've got two different, simultaneous, very definite stimuli which tell your brain "ok, this key has been pressed!", and furthermore, once you get those stimuli, the keypress has been registered.

      Now contrast this with most other keyboard designs. The quiet is nice, simply because it is quiet, but you can't have it both ways. Either you get the auditory stimulus or you don't. The force vs. distance plot wouldn't look quite the same with the sudden drop off; instead it is fairly steady I believe. At any rate, the dropoff is much less marked with most other designs. Furthermore, the drop off, whatever noise there might be, and the keypress registering do not necessarily all occur at the same time. I often find myself, when first using a rubber dome board, lifting my finger back from the key once the dome has buckled (force drop off), but before the keypress has registered. After several minutes of using a rubber dome board, I find myself pounding the keys much harder than necessary in order to insure that the keypress does register.

      So, all the mess about simultaneity and all goes to this: If you have those subconscious stimuli that match up with the keypress quite well, then most people will find themselves able to type a little bit faster. Your brain knows that the keypress has occurred as soon as it gets the stimuli, and so the finger does not need to linger for an extra instant in order to make sure of the keypress. I type slower on other boards, and I make more typing errors.

      Also, as I said above, I pound much harder on other boards, which should definitely be avoided, as it can lead to RSI type problems.

      The design of the Model M tends to prevent dust and liquid damage. The keycaps act like umbrellas, and so no liquid will usually enter the electronics. Instead it just runs down the plastic plate that is in there, and out the drain holes (yes it has drain holes!). Dust and other gribbly junk settles down in between the keys on that same plastic plate, rather than getting into the key mechanism or the electronics.

      Those umbrella keycaps can be removed and rearranged. So if you want a dvorak keyboard, or a french AZERTY board, you can just move your keycaps around. Except for some of the special-shaped keys (Enter, Tab, Backspace, etc), the keycaps are all identical in shape and size.

      The curve of the keyboard matches the natural position of your fingers as they move up and down from the center. There are of course boards which are more ergonomic in this regard, but the gentle curve is much better than the standard flat of cheaper boards.

      And then there's the durability. Most Model Ms have been around for a very long time now. There really aren't any

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    10. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I've spilled coke on a modern keyboard before. It worked fine.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    11. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by Y0tsuya · · Score: 1

      I must admit I miss the old mechanical switches. I was trained to type on IBM Selectrics and the Apple IIe. The Selectric and Apple II lets me type at ~80wps sustained. I basically didn't have to look at the screen while typing, due to the tactile feedback. I KNEW when a key registered. At home I had a succession of Northgate and Keytronic keyboards until the mid 90's when mechanical switches went out of style due to manufacturing costs. I've been using membrane keyboards for 10 years now but still couldn't reach the typing speed I had before with mechanical keyboards. Recently however I found that desktop keyboards are being manufactured with notebook-type scissor switches and marketed as premium offerings. They give a good tactile feedback, although not as much travel as I liked. Nevertheless it has much better feel than membrane. It's good enough for me. Now if the Optimus costs that much, they had better at least use the scissor keys or else it's a non-starter for me.

    12. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      You have a PS-2 keyboard that was made 1986? You mean a 9-pin keyboard. The big round ended cable. Yes IBM made ps-2 versions (small round ended), but most (99.9999999%) have been the 9 pin style ones. They are heavy, loud, and dam nice to type on. They also make good weapons, but tend to not be so good to type on after using it to smash someone in the head.

    13. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Supposedly the keys mechanisms are more ergonomic. I really don't buy that though, the assertion has never been backed up or studied scientifically, it's all just one-off anecdotes. Another claim is that they are more "tactile" meaning that if you feel the click, the click is really made that the computer registers. The only keyboards I've seen that have a problem with not every click being counted as a keypress is only with the very cheap keyboards.

      The fact that those kinds of keyboards aren't offered with native USB support is enough for me to stay away.]

      The durability argument doesn't really help, my Natural Elites are nearly a decade old before one even started failing on me.

    14. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by blincoln · · Score: 1

      So have I. However, if it gets in-between the sheets of plastic, the keyboard will have problems with various bits of the grid being shorted, so that keys will do different things than what they're labelled as. It doesn't happen *every* time you spill a drink on one, but it's happened maybe 33-50% of the time for me.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    15. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      You might as well as, "why do straight men prefer their women to have unambiguously female genitalia?" When you press a key, you get tactile feedback that your press went through; there is no question. With a squishy keyboard you just get more squish.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    16. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by Granis · · Score: 1

      My IBM keyboard is made in 1985, and it has the small PS/2 mini-DIN connector. I was under impression though that IBM started using the PS/2 contact for keyboards way before other pc manufactors did. Are you sure the old big DIN connector are more common on theese keyboards?

    17. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have used a lot of rubber dome keyboards where the keys got sticky
      I'll bet you have.
    18. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I can tell you. I type a *lot* faster on one of those old IBM keyboards than the new crap keyboards they sell these day.

    19. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by sabi · · Score: 1

      I don't have any scientific explanations, but my hands hurt after about half an hour of typing on a crappy keyboard. I can type on a Model M (or the split M15 I have at work) for hours without a problem. This has seemed totally counter-intuitive to me, and I went through many ergonomic keyboards, including the Kinesis ones and an expensive low-force DataHand keyboard as recommended by my hand surgeon, before I discovered that the Model Ms work the best for me. Among the quieter designs that I like and can use are the older, beige/purple SGI keyboards (earlier were proprietary, later were PS/2) from around the time of the 4D/Indigo/Indy, and the Apple Extended/Extended II keyboards.

    20. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I personally prefer my Averatec (read: cheapo brand) laptop's keyboard for its fast action. On the average keyboard, I can probably hit around 90 wpm, but on my laptop's keyboard, I can keep up a sustained 105+ wpm speed. I can't stand the old IBM keyboards -- I can't type fast enough on them. To me, that's all that matters. And before anyone says that I'm just some young whippersnapper who has only been using computers a short while...no. I cut my teeth on a Tandy 1000 when I was maybe 5 years old. I've used IBMs, Dells, Apples (these are by far the worst keyboards, the clear-and-white boards), and Logitechs. The Averatec laptop is by far the best in my experience, and it's not even a high-cost brand of laptop.

      It all comes down to personal preference IMHO, and since there are a lot of old computer hands on /., it makes sense that many would love the old IBMs. I just don't, because it doesn't hold the nostalgia for me. I didn't touch an IBM until I was 12 or so years old.

    21. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by vistic · · Score: 1

      www.pckeyboard.com

      Unicomp makes buckling spring keyboards, they got the tech and rights and what not from Lexmark when they stopped making IBM's keyboards. They're basically the same, except now you can get them with 104-key layouts and USB connectors too. There's quite a few models available, basically all the ones IBM offered, and then some.

      I have an actual IBM as well as a Unicomp, but I use the Unicomp because I need the win key and USB for my Mac. They keys feel and sound exactly the same though.

    22. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by marimbaman · · Score: 1

      Ditto from this pianist. Tactile feedback is a Good Thing, as is durability and stability under the kind of pounding a keyboard gets from people with actual finger muscles. :)

    23. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 1

      The miniature DIN keyboard connector got it's name from the IBM PS/2 line of PCs where it first appeared in 1987. All other manufacturers referred to the connection as PS/2 simply to indicate that their keyboard was compatible with IBM's (at the time) unique standard.

      On a barely related side note, the original PS/2s had keyboard and mouse lines routed to both connectors so it didn't matter which peripheral went where. It wasn't until other manufacturers started cloning the interface that the lines were segregated.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    24. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I just don't understand what the problem with modern, soft, quiet keyboards is. They don't seem to have problems with breaking even under heavy use, so what's up?

      Dude, you simply are not trying hard enough, and I have a box of 1/2 dozen non-functioning 'modern' keyboards here to prove it. Here's a checklist for you to work on.

      1. Throw out your kitchen table, you don't need it. Eat all your pizza at your computer with one hand while typing posts to /. with the other hand.
      2. When you're not eating you should be smoking, you can type alittle faster if you use both hands, holding your cigarette in one of the hands (I use my left hand as it's closer to the ash tray. That way I can try to flick the ashes into the tray before they fall into the keyboard)
      3. Drink plenty of caffeinated beverage, I prefer strong hot coffee. This one alone is what has done in most of the keyboards in my dead-keyboard box.
      4. It's OK if your long haired cat walks all across the keyboard, she's just trying to remind you to go to the bathroom
      5. Please go to the bathroom in the bathroom as normal though.

      This 1984 IBM keyboard I type on now has lived though all that ... the ones in the dead-keyboard box couldn't, and all of them are less than 10 years old (a couple look practically new).

    25. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by troels · · Score: 1

      Yes, but, on a piano, the feedback matters as the force and speed you apply influences the sound (as I'm sure you know), whereas on a computer keyboard, you either press the key or you don't, so the extra feedback is not very useful, unless you got such a crappy keyboard that you can be in doubt whether you pressed the key or not.

      I think the old style keyboards should be banned in shared offices, as the noise is annoying, and the added force the typist must exert could maybe increase the risk of RSI?

    26. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I once got a Compaq Presario with a bad keyboard. Several keys wouldn't work. I got it for $100 as a result. So, I opened it up and took the keyboard apart which was an epic struggle that involved bending out a zillion little metal tabs. I finally figured it out, though. Turned out a beverage had spilling in and removed some traces. Like a sibling to this comment, I fixed it with a conductive pen and sold the laptop for $400 with a 100% working keyboard :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The typist may actually exert less force, because you can tell by feel and by sound when a key has been pressed, whereas with the mushy type of keyboard, you must nail the key each time to avoid unregistered keypresses.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      There are soccer players, pianists, perverts and maniacs.

      Soccer players press the key and expect that their fingers will be thrown back in the air with a good kick feel at the same time. They are the ones who prefer IBM feel. Not bad, not good - it's just a preference where you clearly want to know that you scored where you wanted. It is pretty hard to make mistakes on those keyboards - the force required and key-angle acceptance comes together to create really quite an usable approach that does prevents mistakes. This is the best balance for blind-typing available, no questions barred. It's all about guaranteeing control. Good alternative - Sun Type5 keyboard. Oh, the beauty.

      Pianists like to float across the keyboard and be soft. Not in a fag way, but just - softly directing whatever happens as they please without paying too much attention and accepting that mistakes can and will happen yet trading it in for the beauty, the elegance, of the act of typing. These are the kind of people that will find microsoft internet keyboard (I must admit, haven't followed up on the latest from them recently, but only Microsoft really captures the essence of the elegance of typing, really) feel as the preferred one. Not weak - soft. Worth a try - Sun type6 keyboard. So identical that I occasionally wonder whether it has been actually manufactured by Microsoft.

      Perverts are the kind of people that use recent Mac keyboards. Alternative - typewriter. Touch typing experience is approximately the same with at least 10% of the key presses being stuck because of incorrect approach angle. And all that kind of people.

      Oh, and maniacs - for maniacs the keyboard is a mere representation of the computer itself. A common issue across software developers and their hard-beating-receiving keyboards.

      (what leaves us with logitech, but then again - a mediocrity cannot excel - it just pleases those that know no better)

      (I am drunk and in a poetic state. And therefore will avoid mentioning the 7kg pure 8mm steel sheet keyboard I was using once with my Z80 clone. That had some message and potential. For jailtime, if fulfilled.)

    29. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by espilce · · Score: 1

      I can't tell exactly when the keyboard itself was made, the label on the bottom says 1984, but the computer itself I believe was from 1986. I received two of them from an out of business gas station. Both were IBM Personal System/2, a 386 server and a 286 front desk machine connected by a 50 ft null modem serial cable. Both were dual boot Windows 3.1 and Microsoft Xenix. One had a 20MB HDD, the other a 40MB hdd, with platters about 7" in diameter. The keyboard indeed has a PS/2 connector (with a 10ft curly cable), as the IBM Personal System/2 was the first platform to sport the connection, hence the name.

      The computers were literally falling apart, and horribly dirty from gas station grime, but the keyboard lives on despite being dropped many times and transported between more than 6 houses. I used the towers for target practice. I remember barely being able to get a .45 slug through those suckers. They probably weighed over 50lbs each with all the junk inside them (huge PSU, something like a foot long MCA 300 baud modem, various extra peripherals, and of course the MASSIVE HDD)

      --
      :q!
    30. Re:I've never really understood the obsession by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      The difference in typing speed between an average keyboard and your laptop's board may just be down to spacing and layout. I can't type at all on a laptop, but I'm quite speedy on a normal desktop board (esp. my Model M, and I'm no graybeard, my family's first computer was a 286, and that was when 286s were already old.). The difference is that most laptop boards are smaller; the distance from one key to the next is less, so my fingers overreach and I miss keys or hit two keys at once. Perhaps you've just gotten used to the smaller laptop board, and have trouble adjusting back to a fullsize desktop board.

      The nostalgia really doesn't have much of anything to do with it, at least for me. I just find myself getting more and more frustrated gradually the longer I use a non-Model M board (at work, for instance), whereas I can use my Model M for hours and hours with no problem.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
  37. Great! by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to use the Optimus keyboard with a Phantom console to play Duke Nukem Forever!

    1. Re:Great! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      ...while listening to Chinese Democracy by Guns 'n' Roses.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  38. "Less than a good mobile phone" by melted · · Score: 1

    Remember, folks it's less than a good mobile phone IN RUSSIA. Even subsidized phones aren't subsidized as heavily there, and most phone plans are pre-paid. And it's probably the owner of Russia's leading design studio who wrote that post. For him "a good mobile phone" could easily be $1000.

  39. sick of it all by cygnus · · Score: 1

    is anyone else just sick of hearing about this thing? more than a dozen of my friends have sent me links to this keyboard's site as if i'd never heard about it before. it's going to be grossly overpriced*, and only marginally useful. 99.99% of people won't get one. can we talk about something else now?

    * and I spent $100 for my keyboard

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
  40. 400$ yuck by galaad2 · · Score: 1

    400$ ???!!

    YUCK, no thanks..

    i'll wait for the chinese-built version... i bet it will only be 25$ or so maximum.

    --
    root@127.0.0.1
  41. Who else... by Drakin020 · · Score: 0

    Looks at the keyboard when they type?

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
  42. Better for professional use by jadobbins · · Score: 1

    The features that this keyboard provide are widely unnecessary in comparison to the cost regarding home applications. This keyboard, however, would be absolutely perfect for implications such as the recording industry. In the record business, cost is hardly an issue compared to time, And when you're working with digital audio workstations, such as Pro-Tools which has hundreds of key commands that vastly speed up any recording or mixing process compared to just using a mouse, they are often un-intuitive and hard to memorize. A keyboard like this that could intuitively transform its layout upon starting different applications to reveal program-specific commands would be incredibly helpful, and just all around l33t.

    --
    "There is no Honor, without Pie."
    -Weeble
  43. OLED Lifetime by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they'll have some kind of sleep mode for the displays to ensure they won't burn out prematurely.

    One of the biggest hurdles I'd heard of for OLEDs was their lifespan, particularly for the blue emitters.

    I'm not sure if they have issues with burn in, but a screensaver would be nice too. Perhaps a slideshow that spans all the keys, or Pac Man running back and forth across rows ;)

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    1. Re:OLED Lifetime by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      They've ditched OLEDs in favour of LEDs, apparently for cost reasons.

      I do like the idea of a "screensaver" for it though... :)

  44. I'd like to see... by Trevin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... if this can support emacs. Just think of all the layouts it would have to have -- one for each prefix key in the global keymap and variants for each supported major and minor mode! And what would it do if any of those keymaps were customized?

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. errr... by wayward_bruce · · Score: 1

    Will it come with a cleaning kit of some sort? I dread the thought of a screwdriver being pushed underneath those OLED keys and prying them loose to get to the dirt... Oh, wait a second. It is a wireless keyboard, right? So the keys have wireless connection to the board? Cool, cleaning problem solved :)

  47. Excessive Prices by Slugster · · Score: 1

    I can't find it because I dunno what username I was loggin in with at the time--but-

    In one of the other stories on this (here on /.) I posted a price estimate of $5-$7 for each OLED key. I think at that time, I said I'd be surprised if they could get it out for under $500. I expected it to be further towards $700.

    OLEDs have dropped in price somewhat but not that much, and only for bulk production (which is cell-phone sized displays). I'll stay with my original estimates.

    ---------------

    I think it has its uses, but not as a general-use, full-size keyboard. It'll be fabulously expensive, and people who use keyboards a lot don't need what it can do anyway.
    Maybe as a extra special-function keypad, with 12-16-20 keys on it for special programs. For multilanguage support it would work nicely--except that very few people need that on a regular basis, and for those things that do (such as airport info kiosks) we have fairly-cheap touch screens already for this sort of thing.
    ~

  48. dozens of lines? by rduke15 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Programmers need to type in dozens of lines of code to express a single idea sometimes

    Yes, that happened to me once, when I really needed to use VBA instead of Perl...

    1. Re:dozens of lines? by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yes, that happened to me once, when I really needed to use VBA instead of Perl...


      Hmm, that gives me an idea for a special Perl keyboard, with all the punctuation marks present on the home row, and the letters relegated to the keypad and other 'peripheral' locations.... ;^)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  49. nice for use in voting machines by galaad2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    they also have another nice project in the works... the Optimus Upravlator

    they should think to introduce the Optimus Upravlator to Diebold, ES&S, Sequioa and the other voting machine manufacturers

    The Optimus Upravlator seems to have ample space on each key to display a candidate's name directly on each button ( and left-right scroll arrows maybe on the bottom left and bottom right keys, if the list is longer than the available keys can display ).

    Moreover, for voting machines you don't need all the electronics for five functions on a single button, one electrical contact per button might be enough, or keep all the electromechanical contacts on a button, for redundancy and button balancing, but wire them together.

    This would solve the problems they have with touch screen voting machines that constantly need re-aligning the touchscreen with the display contents.

    You would not end up with the machine selecting the wrong candidate, a different one than the one you tried to highlight on the screen.

    --
    root@127.0.0.1
  50. A "good" phone doesn't only cost $400 by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    A "good" mobile phone doesn't only cost $400. New Motorola and Nokias can easily cost $600. Some of the more advanced phones can go for $800. And if you're looking overseas where they have phones far more sophisticated than anything currently available in the US then expect prices in the range of $1000.

    The definition of "good" is fairly broad. Do you mean "good" as in average or "good" as in top-of-the-line?

  51. royals and underwoods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you learned to type on royals and underwoods that weighed like 50 lbs, you learned to type as an athletic event. Model Ms feel like a typewriter, and you can really wail away at them, actually get some emotion going on there, hammer them puppies, whereas modern mushboards do not feel or act like that. At least that is my reason. I *destroy* mush boards, literally pound them to brokeness, and throw them away every few months or so, and the only reason I don't have a model M right now is the last one has a few broken keys-but I didn't throw it away, either. Just because.

    1. Re:royals and underwoods by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Unicomp will fix your Model M for something like 30$ I believe. Worth looking into for sure.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
  52. Has what promise? by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong; that's a slick hack. But think about it... how much time do you spend looking at your keyboard. If you're over 12, the answer's not much.

    After your first half hour playing quake, you know where the keys are and this thing's gimmick is superfluous.

    not to mention expensive, and likely makes the thing easier-to-break.

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  53. Reminds me of an old joke... by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, You're using an international layout keyboard, aren't you?

    zes, how did zou know?

    BBH

  54. offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Am I the only one who doesn't use that combination? Ctrl + c?
    I only use ctrl + insert, shift + insert. I find it faster because of the same area keys like arrows/home/end/pageup/pagedown.
    And I freeze when I have to use ctrl + c... old habits.

    And I hate the new trend to remove the ins/del home/end pageup/down keys.

  55. Who needs this? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    If I needed an international keyboard, I'd just swap out the caps for the keys. I know I've seen this done some place. Maybe these guys will find a niche market at the UN and other places where many different nationalities frequently sit down at the same keys and don't want to bring their own keyboard. I hope they have planned to recoup their development costs within a small number of units sold.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  56. so its $400 by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 1

    for the g15 which can do that and more just without the lcd as keys?....doesent sound like a good deal to me, drop it to the $75 like my g15 was and ill buy it, but until then, thats $325 too much for a keyboard...

    --
    -Noc
  57. Catchy Catchphrase? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My bets for the tagline for this keyboard:

    Optimus OLED: More than meets the eye.
    or
    Optimus OLED: Robots in disguise.

    'Course, the second may be more of my personal wish than anything.

  58. XML? by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

    I do agree with you about the setup.

    But XML? I prefer plain text files all the time.

    There are APIs to read and write plain text files, if your argument is the "there are libraries!" one.

    Hopefully you don't want to make the keyboard "Web 3.0" compatible.

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  59. Open source, closed mind... by jonr · · Score: 1

    Look people, it is going to be expensive, but not 'Oil-sheik-market' expensive. I can see a lot of use for this. The übergamer will love this, of course, and the semi-rich gadget freaks. But I can imagine that this could be useful in many places. First, it is a true keyboard, you can enter character data, it has a tactile feedback, which makes it better than a touchscreen. (Have you ever tried those?) I can see a version of this in banks, restaurants, and other places. Multimedia authors will love it, switching between Photoshopping, movie- and sound editing, and every function is just a keypress away, without memorizing them like a Shakespeare play.
    Think outside the box.

  60. True but fixable by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

    Conductive ink seemed to work for me. Still using it, it's 8 years old by now.

    However, ony two keys were dead and then fixed, not the entire keyboard.

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  61. No scaling up by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Their 3-button model didn't get a brilliant review; It had a 3 FPS refresh rate, gave off an annoying whine and appeared to use 10% of the CPU on a powerful PC.

    Now for the keyboard they've dropped OLED, dropped the extra function keys and moved back to LCD meaning that you'll need an external power brick to power it.

    1. Re:No scaling up by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The CPU Usage is the scary part. If 3 Keys take 10% imagine what 104+ Keys will do. I am assuming you will not want all your keys animated. And they may have upgraded the driver since then. But Ill take my MacBook Pro glowing keyboard Until the Optimus keyboard can prove itself to be light weight enough not to take more CPU Cycles then the application you are programming.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  62. Marketing *way* too early by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Nearly a year and a half after some spiffy 3D rendered pics, they've almost got a product out that vaguely resembles the original idea. In the meantime, the product has become so infamous that the little 3-button teaser product needed a note specifically saying it wasn't vapourware when ThinkGeek opened up pre-orders. I think they peaked too soon.

    Meanwhile, the Ideazon Zboard (a range of key sets that include highly customised key shapes) and the Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard (LCD display built into keyboard) have been in the market for ages. And they're affordable.

  63. Probably won't work by OfNoAccount · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately the 3-key mini-Optimus only supports a refresh rate of 3fps, which I suspect will be too slow for anything other than strategy type games. Of course the full size one might be quicker, but somehow I doubt it...

    P.S. Anyone who wants to see what developer tools/information they already have, click here. Good news is it looks like they have a protocol description, for the mini at least.

  64. $600? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a good cell phone and it cost me less than $200 brand new. A good phone has good reception, good battery life, and sounds good to you and the person you're talking to. Everything else (including a lot of things you probably like and consider important) are irrelevant as to whether or not the phone's any good.

  65. my email to Optimus by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    You created such an innovative keyboard (Optimus) but you are still using the
    old-fashioned staggered columns design. While this may be enough for the
    majority of people, it isn't the right choice for customers who focus on
    ergonomics.

    I personally use TypeMatrix [ www.typematrix.com ] and Plum [ www.plum.bz ]
    keyboards that have a matrix layout, similar to the numeric keypad, and
    several ergonomic features.

    I would consider buying an Optimus keyboard if it had a matrix layout and
    ergonomic features like centre keys for important functions such as Enter or
    Backspace (a very important step towards ergonomics is balancing the use of
    the left and right hands).

    I hope you will research the market of matrix and ergonomic keyboards and
    consider releasing a more ergonomic version of Optimus, even if its price
    would be higher.

    Thanks,

    --
    Nikolaos S. Karastathis (NSK), BSc(Hons), MBCS, MIET, MIEEE, MACS(Prov)

  66. Coffee Proofness by theeddie55 · · Score: 1

    I think i'll stick with cheap keyboards for the moment, unless these things are coffee proof, then it might be worth the investment.

    1. Re:Coffee Proofness by Duggeek · · Score: 1

      I'm right there with ya.

      It's like the theory of cheap sunglasses.

      You buy a nice pair of shades from Shades-r-us-hut.com for $80 and they look real nice. They block UV, they make the glare of the sun look like HL2 eye candy and might even masquerade as a music player.

      You enjoy them for a week, then one day you sit on them. In a heartbeat, they're ruined. The warranty doesn't cover ass-damage claims, so you're out 80 bucks.

      The nihilistic shopper tends to grab a decent pair of shades at WallyWorld for $8, pockets the difference and doesn't feel so bad when they get accidentally stepped-on.

      I think the paradigm transfers well to PC keyboards; if you get the Optimus keyboard and spill your mocha on it the next day, does it go kaputt? Can we expect to see competing, less-expensive concepts in the marketplace? (like membrane overlays for standard 84-key QWERTY layouts)

      Then again, maybe there are people that go buy a $400 cellphone only to drop it in a puddle.

      --
      This post © Copyrite Duggeek, all rights reversed.
  67. Enter Key placement by dovgr · · Score: 1

    Did you notice where they placed the Enter key? Two whole keys to the right of where it is usually placed. I guess not too many touchtypers would buy this keyboard anyhow...

  68. You forgot by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1

    Keyboard porn.

    Make it a puzzle - like Concentration. You have to match up items. Each matched set of items is replaced with a section of the final image.

    I suppose the final image could be anything. Doesn't have to be porn. Funny - that was the first thing that sprang to mind...

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  69. this looks like a delicate and time consuming job by Placebo+Messiah · · Score: 1

    nice keyboard how do you clean it?

  70. No... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    the Optimus LCD keyboard can be powered by the PS/2 port. Remember the Cuecat scanner? LCD/LEDs do not require that much power at all.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  71. Touch Typists by chris_sawtell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What a load of expensive dung. No decent touch typist ever looks at the keys! So what's the point?

    1. Re:Touch Typists by Canis+Latrans · · Score: 1

      actually, not true. I learned to type Dvorak a few years ago, so I usually don't look at the keys... because they are all marked in QWERTY and don't say the real names of the letters anyhow. The only way I know how to type is starting with my hands in the home position. Unfortunately, this doesn't work too well for when I'm using the mouse and then I have to press a combination like "Ctrl-X". In that case, I haven't started with my hands in the right place so I have idea where X is. Over time I've just learned to remember that the key that says "B" is the one I need to press when I do "Ctrl-X". I would *Love* having one of these LCD keyboards so I could have software Dvorak keycaps without having to buy a true Dvorak keyboard that would scare away my wife or anyone else that sits down at the computer.

  72. $400 for a keyboard???? by therufus · · Score: 0

    I don't care how fancy it is. If I spend $400 on a keyboard, it better have a blowjob button!!!

    Won't take Ozzie that long to figure it out.... SHAROONNNNN!!!!!

    --
    You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
  73. Down with Windows keys by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 1

    While we're on the subject of keyboards, does anyone know where I could find a keyboard that either doesn't have the windows keys or they can be disabled or made to do something else?

    1. Re:Down with Windows keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Logitech G15 lets you disable the Windows key

  74. Save $400 by jeberle · · Score: 1

    System Preferences... > International > Input Menu > Keyboard Viewer
    [x] Show input menu in menu bar

    Nice idea, although they botched the physical layout. That 'Enter' key looks way out there! It goes [L], [;], ['], [Enter]! Duh.

  75. Durability is a non issue. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Very few things are done to last as well as computer keyboards.

    The one I am using was bought in 1995 and is still going strong.

    It is one of the original MS Natural Keyboards, the last product I ever bought from them. I would recommended it but given who they are I don't do so.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  76. Senseless nostalgia. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Most keyboards nowadays are immensely better and there are many that are ergonomically sound. But nostalgia is an strong feeling.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.