Slashdot Mirror


Mars Probe Probably Lost Forever

David Shiga writes, "NASA's silent Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) spacecraft is likely lost forever. The space agency attempted to take a picture of the 10-year-old spacecraft using the newer Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, but did not detect it, either because its orbit has shifted since last contact, or because it isn't reflecting enough sunlight to be visible. NASA has now ordered its Opportunity rover to listen from the planet's surface for MGS's radio beacon. If that fails, the agency may call on the European Space Agency's Mars Express spacecraft to join the search. But MGS may already have run out of power and NASA officials are not optimistic about recovering it."

167 comments

  1. Missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did they check Mars? I would bet that it is probably there.

    1. Re:Missing? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      That might be a problem - they just drove one of their rovers into a giant pothole and the other's got a broken leg.

    2. Re:Missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      They are trying to search Mars, but Google has yet to release GoogleMars, crippeling the search for both Cylon *caugh* i mean robots, yea, robots, as well as martians.

    3. Re:Missing? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  2. Transformers by firehawk2k · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was that the one crushed by the Decepticons? I don't think we'll be recovering it anytime soon.

  3. May I be the first to say.... by mhore · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it was obviously captured by aliens.

    --

    Mmmm......sacrelicious.

    1. Re:May I be the first to say.... by MrShaggy · · Score: 2, Funny

      First to welcome our new Martian Over-Lords

      Please, take our leader!

      How about the song of the day

      "This is ground control to Major Tom. Your circuit's dead, is there something wrong?"

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    2. Re:May I be the first to say.... by Ridcully · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I claim this probe in the name of Mars! Isn't that delightful?" - Marvin

      Funny that. Aliens taking our probes, rather than the other way 'round.

    3. Re:May I be the first to say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny. But seriously: what if it was, and we found out? How would humanity respond?

    4. Re:May I be the first to say.... by stunt_penguin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Declare a War on Martians, probably, followed by a swift invasion.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    5. Re:May I be the first to say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello humankind, you have 3 days to surrender...

      If they could get from one solar system to the next then they could smack us hard..

    6. Re:May I be the first to say.... by Electric-PI · · Score: 1

      EZ just declare them part of the axis of evil, say they have WMD, and invade them.

    7. Re:May I be the first to say.... by stunt_penguin · · Score: 4, Funny

      *shifts uncomfortably in seat*

      Well it's about time they got some probing action.... my doctor says the cream is helping though.

      Thank goodness for small blessings and all that.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    8. Re:May I be the first to say.... by erpbridge · · Score: 1, Troll

      I can see Bush now....

      Gentlemen, the Martians have attacked our spy sattelite. Attack now... We will impress them with our Shock and Awe strategy!

      Behold, Our Superior airpower... What do you mean, we only have a couple light armament sattelites? Wasn't that what daddy's president made Star Wars for, and Empire Strikes back? Send out the X-Wings!

      Guess we'll have to resort to the secondary Shock and Awe strategy... Moon them, then shower them with cute teddy bears.

    9. Re:May I be the first to say.... by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Please, take our leader!

            Surely they wouldn't be THAT stupid, would they?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    10. Re:May I be the first to say.... by Firehed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Our probes take aliens? Must be one of the newer problems...

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    11. Re:May I be the first to say.... by PeterB87 · · Score: 2, Funny

      On Soviet Mars, probes alienate you... ?

    12. Re:May I be the first to say.... by psxman · · Score: 2, Funny
      Please, take our leader!
      You mean: Take our leader, please!
    13. Re:May I be the first to say.... by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      They don't call it "the Red Planet" for nothing... ;-)

    14. Re:May I be the first to say.... by h2g2bob · · Score: 1

      In soviet russia, mars probes you

    15. Re:May I be the first to say.... by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      Send out the X-Wings!

      They are not X-Wings... they are Zigs. For greater justice.

      --
      So say we all
    16. Re:May I be the first to say.... by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      On Mars, the Zhti Ti Kofft are the natives. We would be the aliens if we went there. This probe was taken out by them much like the others.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    17. Re:May I be the first to say.... by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      Mars is in our solar system...

    18. Re:May I be the first to say.... by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      Along that vein, I have to say that I'm genuinely disappointed to not find another installment Tripmaster Monkey's running gag of the martian war machine.

      --
      Fnord.
    19. Re:May I be the first to say.... by gd23ka · · Score: 1

      You have an interesting point there, because it may well be that an advanced civilization
      contacting us may just as well ignore our "leadership" and address us directly maybe
      individually or in larger groups...

  4. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When did all this happen?

    1. Re:Huh? by Daetrin · · Score: 1, Informative
      When did all this happen?

      Well you could just click on the link to RTFA and find that it happened on the 2nd of this month. (This month is November if you're _really_ not paying attention.) Or you could put "mars" into the search bar for Slashdot and find this article from about a week and a half ago.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  5. It was a good run... by hedgemage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You got to admit, we've been having some fantastic luck with some of the recent Mars missions. Unfortunately, the luck has either been fantasticly good or fantasticly bad.
    We just have to keep reminding ourselves that sending something millions of miles through space to a speck of rock and have it function so well for so long is an amazing achievement in and of itsself.

    1. Re:It was a good run... by jfruhlinger · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Global Surveyor probe completed its primary mission in 2001 and was in an "extended mission" phase. While its extended mission was to last until 2008, it was already essentially on bonus time. This is definitely still in the good luck category.

    2. Re:It was a good run... by quanticle · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the Mars Global Surveyor finished its mission, and had long outlasted its original mission scope when the failure occurred. While unfortunate, this failure isn't wholly unanticipated as the craft was "out of warranty" as it were.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    3. Re:It was a good run... by dsci · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is definitely still in the good luck category.

      Exactly. People can say what they want about NASA | JPL, but the bottom line is they put up some good stuff much of the time. What really got my eye was how they just 'asked' Opportunity to listen for it. That is, that those things are so dynamic in what they do and can be 'asked' to do simply amazes me.

      Who knew years ago when Opportunity (also past expected mission life, right?) was designed that it would be on-the-fly tasked to listen for another spacecraft's signal. That it was designed in this way is a testament to well planned engineering. IMO.

      --
      Computational Chemistry products and services.
    4. Re:It was a good run... by be-fan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What I'm incredibly impressed over is the fact that they're mobilizing other space craft in the area to look for the missing probe. The fact that NASA can get spacecraft designed for complete autonomy in extreme environments, and designed years apart by different groups at that, to cooperate with each other all while tens of millions of miles from the closest human, well, that's a pretty impressive bit of engineering.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:It was a good run... by O.W.M · · Score: 3, Funny

      What really got my eye was how they just 'asked' Opportunity to listen for it. That is, that those things are so dynamic in what they do and can be 'asked' to do simply amazes me.

      Well, they did say please...

    6. Re:It was a good run... by KKlaus · · Score: 0

      I don't want to dis NASA (because I like them too), but come on. All these missions are multi-billion dollar expeditions. If after billions of dollars of development, no one has thought, hey, maybe we should build these things so that we can give them new instructions if something comes up, and maybe we should make them so they can listen to diverse sets of radio broadcasts, they'd be real assholes.

      Again, I like NASA a lot, and they do some very impressive engineering, but if you're impressed because they don't make "fire and forget" spacecraft, I think that's really more a statement on low expectations for our space program.

      --
      Relax I just want some peanuts.
    7. Re:It was a good run... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I don't want to dis NASA (because I like them too), but come on. All these missions are multi-billion dollar expeditions.


      No, none of these were multi-billion dollar missions.

      MGS cost something like a quarter billion bucks, iirc, and the pair of rovers together was somewhere north of $800 million.
    8. Re:It was a good run... by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1
      That is, that those things are so dynamic in what they do and can be 'asked' to do simply amazes me.

      Wasn't the software for these rovers uploaded while they were travelling to Mars? They certainly have broadcast and reception hardware (to communicate ofcourse) so how hard would it be to send a patch or instructions to listen to certain frequencies (on which the Opportunity is broadcasting)? Right now I'm "asking" my monitor to display characters and send data to another server...

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    9. Re:It was a good run... by FirienFirien · · Score: 1

      It's the 21st century and you're amazed that computers have rewriteable code?

      While it doesn't say whether they rewrote a module to do this or simply set Opportunity to listen on a particular frequency (they don't even have to tell it what it's looking for - if it picks up a relatively strong signal, it's going to be the MGS) - it'd be more astounding if they hadn't built in flexibility in this day and age.

      --
      Browsing with +2 to insightful posts and a higher threshold makes the average post seen seem a lot more ingenious
    10. Re:It was a good run... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While I completely agree the rovers are amazing works of engineering, using the satellites as a relay to Earth was a design feature of the 2 current rovers. From the wiki:

      The benefits of using the orbiting spacecraft are that the orbiters are closer to the rovers than the Deep Space Network antennas on Earth and the orbiters have Earth in their field of view for much longer time periods than the rovers on the ground.
    11. Re:It was a good run... by nagaicho · · Score: 3, Funny
      Who knew years ago when Opportunity (also past expected mission life, right?) was designed that it would be on-the-fly tasked to listen for another spacecraft's signal. That it was designed in this way is a testament to well planned engineering. IMO.


      Luckily one of the engineers realised that if Opportunity was to bounce an inverse-polarity tachyon beam through the fifth phase of a quantum singularity, it might be possible to convert Opportunity's deflector dish into a scanning-tunnelling pulse wave detector.
    12. Re:It was a good run... by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      It's like putting too much air in a balloon!

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    13. Re:It was a good run... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      We're talking a space probe that has no fuel left for orbital manuevers and probably the on-board electronics running WAY beyond its original operational life. It's amazing Mars Global Surveyor has lasted this long....

    14. Re:It was a good run... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue isn't the operations software, the issue is the radio.
      Are they using SDR on that beast? If so, that is cool, and also leading edge when you consider when the rover was designed and built. Even with SDR, and even if it is just a wide band tunable analog set, you still have the issue of antenna design. Your cell phone nubbin is just about worthless for FM band reception. So it is sort of cool that the rover has the ability to tune in.

    15. Re:It was a good run... by Crucial · · Score: 1

      If I recall, both the mars landers were designed so that new software could be uploaded to them so NASA could add more advanced functionality to both the landers, thus improving their usefulness, not to mention allowing their roles to change as needed. So long as the scientists here could figure out a new way of using the equipment on board both landers in a new and unique way, they could update the landers on the fly. (As on the fly you can get anyway with the things being on another planet.)

      You gotta admit though, if there is intelligent life on other planets, and they're listening in on our conversations with our space hardware, one of these days they might one day take control of our own equipment. If that's not actually what happened here already? (Albeit unlikely).

      --
      I truly believe the Earth is the insane asylum for the universe.
    16. Re:It was a good run... by cplusplus · · Score: 1
      Opportunity (also past expected mission life, right?)
      Yep! By about 914 days!
      --
      "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
    17. Re:It was a good run... by cloricus · · Score: 1

      Careful now you wouldn't want a feed back loop that caused a cascading energy pulse that would cause the main power source to explode in just over five minutes!

      --
      I ate your fish.
    18. Re:It was a good run... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      You'd better go read up on RF Engineering -- that simple "broadcast and reception hardware" is a lot more complex than you would like to believe.

      You don't just "ask" a high-performance radio to receive on a specific frequency or modulation type. They have to be designed to be there doing that in the first place. And those radios work or the datalink that allows the upload of code changes simply wouldn't be there. They were designed, tested and done -- long before launch.

      An example: Uploading code into your car's FM stereo system to "ask" it to receive XM Satellite digital signals, isn't going to do diddly. Wrong frequency band, wrong antenna type, wrong modulation/demodulation hardware... etc.

      The frequencies and radios in use between ALL of the NASA/Mars spacecraft is a well-designed, well-orchestrated system, considering they also need to be heard from incredible distances directly by their controllers on Earth when required.

      For more information on that, look up details of the Deep Space Network (DSN). When you have to cryogenically cool (freeze) your antennas to get the thermal noise down so you can hear some weak signal out there, even using a dish the size of my house to gather the EM waves -- you're working on something that took a lot more thought than just uploading a patch to a rover.

      The fact that they CAN patch the rovers remotely all hinges on the RF engineers that make the various radio links work. Most of them cut their teeth transmitting to and receiving from Voyager I and II, which they did all the way to the end of the Sun's magnetic influence and our solar system.

      If you go all the way back to Apollo, and the manned moon missions, the technology was relatively crude, but just as well-planned and laid out. You can find all sorts of frequency and system detail for Apollo at http://www.honeysucklecreek.net/ -- which in and of itself is a fascinating primer on how difficult it was back then to communicate just with the Moon.

      Now controllers "talk" all day long to Mars... time-delayed by the speed of light. Truly an amazing feat.

      But hell, we're all about instantaneous cell phone communications, and we bitch when a cell phone call drops these days -- completely ignoring the complexity that's gone into building a worldwide RF network in almost every significantly populated area where a pocket-phone with an antenna smaller than your pinky finger, is a reality.

      I find the stuff fascinating, and think about what's next in RF Engineering. Software-Defined Radio seems to be the best "tinkerers playground" these days -- someone's going to have some major breakthrough there that's going to re-define how we all do RF Engineering. Only a matter of time.

      Time will tell if so-called techno-geeks in the U.S. ever find it interesting again, too.

      RF Engineering is still a huge opportunity for a good student. All the discussions of Slashdot about CS and Software Engineering courses not being worth the paper they're printed on... and people complaining about that are silly. Students would be wise to ALSO study the works of Mr. Ohm, Mr. Maxwell, Mr. Nyquist, Mr. Watt, Mr. Marconi, etc... etc... etc... those skills are instantly applicable to almost every major product or service for sale in the tech fields today. Add in computer programming knowledge and you're suddenly on a path to some really interesting projects.

      And it's lucrative too. Ask anyone that's created a $30 lighting controller for your house how much they had to pay a consulting RF Engineer to make sure the device didn't emit any serious Electo-Magnetic Interference (EMI) for their various certifications!

      --
      +++OK ATH
  6. This just in... by ectotherm · · Score: 5, Funny

    A pink rabbit beating a large bass drum was just spotted in the vicinity of Mars. Communications with the Mars Probe are expected to resume momentarily... ;)

    --
    "Nature bats last..."
    1. Re:This just in... by boarsai · · Score: 1

      The signal was actually lost as that rabbit got tired of beating a drum and decided to beat on the probe instead. Seriously, if you spend that long in space with nothing but a drum, you'd go crazy too. You'd possibly also be dead... but don't let that stop you! Quiters are losers.

    2. Re:This just in... by benplaut · · Score: 1

      Pink bunnies 'beating' a probe. Vivid.

  7. Re:This article reminds you that DEATH is FOREVER by rochi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How the hell did the loss of a rover lead you to atheism being the source of all violence? Also, in regards to that nice little book, the bloodthirstiness is sort of global. There are just as many mass murderers who say "god told me to" as there are mass murderers who decide that the lack of a big scary bogeyman means they can throw morality out the window.

  8. Any other options? by Bob54321 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "either because its orbit has shifted since last contact, or because it isn't reflecting enough sunlight to be visible"

    So either it wasn't there or it was there but they didn't see it. I think that has to pretty safe to say they have limited the problem down considerably.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
    1. Re:Any other options? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing NASA, it was equally likely they were looking at it, but just had no fucking clue that was the case. Though I'm still not ruling that out. ;)

    2. Re:Any other options? by darkhalo101 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they are trying to find a black cat in a dark basement at midnight and the cat might not even be there. :-) www.thatpoliticalblog.com

      --
      www.ThatPoliticalBlog.com [URL="http://www.thatpol
  9. Plague by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why are humans, a plague on this planet, trying to gain dominion over the others?

    If God had meant us to fly, he'd have given us rocket engines, day one.

    (Yes, tongue is firmly in cheek.)

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Plague by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

      If God had meant us to come down out of the trees, he would have taken away our prehensile toes!

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    2. Re:Plague by Xzzy · · Score: 4, Informative

      If he hadn't intended us to look at porn, he wouldn't have given us opposable thumbs.

    3. Re:Plague by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Funny

      (Time Bandits)

      Evil: If I were creating the world I wouldn't mess about with butterflies and daffodils. I would have started with lasers, eight o'clock, Day One!
      [zaps one of his minions accidentally, minion screams]
      Evil: Sorry.

    4. Re:Plague by Plutonite · · Score: 4, Funny

      If he hadn't intended you nitwits to be seen, he would have given me mod points.

    5. Re:Plague by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      If God had meant us to fly, he'd have given us rocket engines, day one.

            Light one of your farts on fire, and tell me that's not a rocket engine...10-9-8-7...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:Plague by Meph_the_Balrog · · Score: 1

      Modded insightful no less =)

    7. Re:Plague by TeXMaster · · Score: 1
      Actually, if he hadn't intended us to look at porn, he wouldn't have given us eyes.

      If you're talking about masturbation, on the other hand, other questions are raised. For example, women don't need thumbs to masturbate. So, if didn't have opposable thumbs, would that mean that women could masturbate but men couldn't?

      And of course you have to consider that the thumb is not strictly necessary for masturbation (you could use all of your others fingers for a grip). And considering that even animals without hands masturbate, although not always to orgams.

      But most of all, how the heck did you get modded Informative? Unless it's because of the information of you using the thumbs to masturbate ...

      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
    8. Re:Plague by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      And what about nipples for men??

  10. Re:Anybody going to miss it? by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    Suppose you wished we'd just stayed up in the trees then, ya?

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  11. Lost forever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's probably in an unknown orbit. Chances are as our space travel technology improves and we start to colonize Mars, it will turn up someday. Either it will be detected in orbit by one of our spacecraft, or its orbit will decay and its remains will be found on the Martian surface as research and civilization there expands. It might be a few hundred years, but eventually most of what we sent there could be found.

    Either that or it will appear in a future episode, with..certain...alien mutations.

    1. Re:Lost forever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GLOB-VEY seeks its creator!

    2. Re:Lost forever? by TheCoop1984 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't most of MGS burn up in Mars' atmosphere when its orbit decays sufficiently (as per the article)? There's certainly enough atmosphere to do aerobraking on...

      --
      95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
  12. time for a rescue mission, perhaps? by kevintron · · Score: 1, Funny

    Many people joke, somewhat grimly, about the casualty rate for Mars missions. In this case we have a serious lesson to draw from what is happening. Having several other probes active at the same time gives us options we otherwise would not have.

    If Mars Global Surveyor had been out there all alone, mission controllers would have little choice other than waiting for it to somehow recover and renew contact on its own. Having Spirit, Opportunity, the Mars Reconaissance Orbiter, Mars Odyssey, and Mars Express all out there at the same time, we get more chances to figure out some truly innovative way to save the troubled spacecraft.

    However, if all these other efforts fail, we should seriously consider sending up a human repair crew to rescue Mars Global Surveyor. We have seen how the Hubble Space Telescope can rally public support for extra launches of the Space Shuttle. A thoughtfully run campaign to save Mars Global Surveyor could, in some small but perhaps crucial way boost public support for sending humans to Mars.

  13. Re:Anybody going to miss it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am, for the simple reason that I was having fun rendering high-detail Mars planetoid 3D art. The sheer amount of data I've downloaded from the MGS project alone and NASA's JPL webservers would probably astonish you.
    The resolutions available would STUPIFY you.
    3D art is nothing more than a hobby to me, but it's fun to render still-images and sometimes video of a simple sphere with more detail than is available even with Google Earth.

  14. it was aliens by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0

    Oh look, there's a video of aliens carrying it off on Youtube...lol just kidding, I guess not EVERYTHING is on Youtube. But clearly, it was kidnapped by aliens. The next one they send ought to have anti-alien defense mechanisms. Btw it sounds like there's a freakin lot of rovers and such on Mars at the moment. Just how many does Earth have there at the moment? I thought it was like 2.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  15. Re:This article reminds you that DEATH is FOREVER by Scoldog · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Off topic, but you've just reminded me of a Billy Connolly sketch.

    He said "Go on TV and tell the audience that God talks to you, they will send in money. Go to any loony bin and tell them God talks to you, they won't even let you home for your pajamas."

    --
    This space for rent
  16. Not a bad run by Schemat1c · · Score: 5, Funny

    Continual probing of a heavenly body for almost 10 years? Beats my record by a long shot.

    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    1. Re:Not a bad run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      10 years versus 20 seconds? Yeah, i'd say so.

  17. Re:This article reminds you that DEATH is FOREVER by The_Abortionist · · Score: 0, Funny

    Always remember: The Medium is the Message, and the Message is the Audience (and the message is really stupid).

    --
    Linux violates 235 Microsoft patents.
  18. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the dingo ate your baby.

  19. lost forever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    probably its software was written in java.

  20. Calling ESA? by KeepQuiet · · Score: 1

    Calling Europen Space Agency? Didn't those guys lost their own rover too?

    1. Re:Calling ESA? by KeepQuiet · · Score: 1

      I am not American (European student in US). So no it didn't hurt anything.

    2. Re:Calling ESA? by Aerovoid · · Score: 1

      If you read your own link, you will have noticed that it was made by a group of British academics and with the help of a couple UK universities. And not by the ESA, it just hitched a ride on the Mars Express. Not unlike the Cassini-Huygens mission to Saturn, where the Huygens Probe(ESA) hitched a ride with the Cassini probe(NASA). Also the Beagle 2 was not a rover, just a lander. A bit nit picky I know, but I still...

  21. It's not about LUCK... by posterlogo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    SO many posts here about the curse of Mars or whatever, but you have to remember Surveyer was on the 10th year of its 2 year mission!! It exceeded its specs and performed beautifully. It's sad to lose an orbiter, but at this point, it shouldn't be considered a failed mission.

  22. Dang... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Goodnight, sweet prince.

  23. Time to update... by DangerTenor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It might be time to update the Mars Scorecard.... although we got some good work out of the MGS, it might be time to mark this one up for the green guys.

    --
    Check out our infosecurity industry blog: http://securitymusings.com/
    1. Re:Time to update... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It might be time to update the Mars Scorecard.... although we got some good work out of the MGS, it might be time to mark this one up for the green guys.


      You know, I mostly stopped commenting (or even reading) space related stories on /. long ago, because the commenters and moderators don't know jack shit about space or space exploration.

      You just got added to the wrong column of that scorecard.

      Mars Global Surveyor was a huge win in Earth's column. The spacecraft returned friggen superb results, for far longer than we expected. We didn't get "some good work out of MGS," we got vast amounts of good work out of it.

      God damn, I wish Slashdot quit posting space related stories.
    2. Re:Time to update... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Lighten up. Everybody understands what a success Mars Global Surveyor has been, but let's face it: Mars is a very hostile environment, and its distance makes it very hard to debug a problem when it occurs. I think everybody enjoys the mythology of attributing spacecraft failures which can't be properly diagnosed from this distance to "hostile Martian action". It gives the old Martian mythology of Lowell, Welles, Welles, and Chuck Jones a nice, amusing, non-threatening afterlife. At it's a lot funnier to hear someone complain about Martians that it is to hear them howl in frustration about how a minor problem that could easily be fixed in Earth orbit will kill a Mars orbiter dead before anyone can figure out what has gone wrong.

    3. Re:Time to update... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody understands what a success Mars Global Surveyor has been, but let's face it: Mars is a very hostile environment

      Global Surveyer was in orbit. I don't think the environment on Mars played a roll in it's failure.

  24. DURACELL Batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is what happens when you believed the hype and put the cheaper Radio Shack Energizer Bunny batteries in your mission critical apps way back then...

  25. Forever? by Explodicle · · Score: 1

    Perhaps if we ever colonize Mars, someone will stumble upon its wreckage.

    1. Re:Forever? by rising_hope · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing myself. When I read the post, I thought to myself "forever?" Indefinitely seems a much more appropriate word.

    2. Re:Forever? by __aawdrj2992 · · Score: 1

      Too bad this future civilization will have not method of getting the data off the legacy storage device in the probe...

  26. Thats ok by Dersaidin · · Score: 1

    My mom can pick it up after she gets me from soccer practice.

  27. Re:Anybody going to miss it? by Lost_In_Specs · · Score: 1

    Suppose you wished we'd just stayed up in the trees then, ya?

    For my money, this whole leaving the oceans thing was a bad idea.

  28. Re:What is with Mars? by toadlife · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1) Because it's fairly close to us?

    2) Because there is evidence that there used to be water on the planet, which means it's possible there used to be life there?

    3) Because it's atmosphere is relatively mild, which makes it easier to build machines that can stand it?

    4) Just because?

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  29. Sony Battery Recall by QuantumRiff · · Score: 3, Funny

    NASA was trying to cut costs by using off the shelf components. Unfortunately, UPS does not deliver replacement batteries to their current location ;)

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
  30. Wow.... by dtdns · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And I thought losing SSH access to my BSD server 3000 miles away was a tough break. I can't even imagine what kind of inventive hacks would be needed to restore a lost probe orbiting another planet.

    1. Re:Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I thought losing SSH access to my BSD server 3000 miles away was a tough break. I can't even imagine what kind of inventive hacks would be needed to restore a lost probe orbiting another planet.

      Bend over, I'll explain later.

  31. Sycorax Rock! by camperdave · · Score: 2, Funny

    We own you. We now possess your land, your minerals, your precious spacecraft. You will surrender or you will die. Sycorax strong! Sycorax mighty! Sycorax rock!

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Sycorax Rock! by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      "You will destroy the Cybermen with four Daleks?"

      "We would destroy the Cybermen with ONE dalek."

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    2. Re:Sycorax Rock! by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      "You are superior to us in only one regard" "What is that?" "You are better than us at dy-ing" Daleks trash-talking... gotta love it

      --
      FGD 135
    3. Re:Sycorax Rock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > "You are superior to us in only one regard" "What is that?" "You are better than us at dy-ing" Daleks trash-talking... gotta love it

      "Oh yeah? Let's see if you 'superior beings' can Ex-terminate your way up these stairs!"

    4. Re:Sycorax Rock! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      "Oh yeah? Let's see if you 'superior beings' can Ex-terminate your way up these stairs!"

      Modern Daleks Float.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:Sycorax Rock! by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Daleks don't climb stairs. They level the building.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    6. Re:Sycorax Rock! by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Hehe. When I saw that I thought something similar:

      "Wow. They got a pair of Macs to talk shit to one another."

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  32. Lost in Space by majoritywhip · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Forever? Is the submitter implying that humans will Never make it to Mars?

    1. Re:Lost in Space by biocute · · Score: 1

      Mars? Are you implying that the probe will always land on Mars?

    2. Re:Lost in Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My theory is that we'll rediscover it accidentally with the next lander...

    3. Re:Lost in Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that mars is a bit bigger than your back yard, don't you?

  33. Voyager is going to keep its record... by surfdaddy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    for a while longer. The two spacecraft, launched in the mid 1970's, are almost 30 years old. And they're still working, 9 billion miles away. They're well beyond the orbit of Pluto. Now that's impressive. Not to take away from Mars Global Surveyor or the twin rovers.

    1. Re:Voyager is going to keep its record... by necro81 · · Score: 1

      I agree - that those craft are still even alive is a wonder. Still, considering how old they are, how far away, and how run down their power sources are, does NASA still get anything from them? Are they actually still working in any appreciable way?

      Curious to know (not just nit-picking semantics), I decided to go to the JPL mission page. Voyager 1 passed the 100 AU mark this summer, that's about 12 light-hours. Although it's signal is very weak, we can still talk to it a bit. According to this blurb, "Flight controllers believe both spacecraft will continue to operate and send back valuable data until at least the year 2020."

      Looks like we're still on track for V-GER to become sentient and return to earth in a few centuries.

    2. Re:Voyager is going to keep its record... by darkmeridian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's because Voyager is nuclear powered. Good luck getting the masses to approve shooting up another nuclear power package.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    3. Re:Voyager is going to keep its record... by cyclone96 · · Score: 5, Informative

      does NASA still get anything from them?

      Absolutely. Voyagers 1 and 2 are still doing significant work, since they are so distant and still functioning. They have begun to encounter the outer reaches of the solar system, where the influence of the Sun ends and interstellar space begins. NASA believes they recently crossed the termination shock and may be approaching the Heliopause. More here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliopause

      It's going to be a very, very, very long time before another probe gets out as far as the Voyagers are (if Pluto Express lasts that long, at least 20 years). Voyager gets a fairly decent chunk of Deep Space Network tracking time because of the importance of what it is doing.

      The oldest satellites still functioning are Pioneers 6,7, and 8, which are all around 40 years old and still ticking. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_6,_7,_8_and_9 . They don't get tracked much, however, because the science they are returning has been surpassed by other probes. They've basically become an experiment in how long satellites can still function.

      --
      Worst...sig...ever!
    4. Re:Voyager is going to keep its record... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's because Voyager is nuclear powered. Good luck getting the masses to approve shooting up another nuclear power package.


      New Horizons, another nuclear powered spacecraft, was launched to Pluto earlier this year.

      You dumb fuck.
    5. Re:Voyager is going to keep its record... by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Informative
      That's because Voyager is nuclear powered. Good luck getting the masses to approve shooting up another nuclear power package.

      That's the prevalent meme - but the reality is that space based nuclear power has gotten steadily less controversial. The Mars Science Laboratory Rover will almost certainly be nuclear powered - and the proposal to do so has drawn nary a peep.
    6. Re:Voyager is going to keep its record... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy. Don't tell them. Say they live off biodegradable fluffy duracells and they'll happily go back to their favourite soaps.

    7. Re:Voyager is going to keep its record... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Easy. Don't tell them. Say they live off biodegradable fluffy duracells and they'll happily go back to their favourite soaps.


      What kind of crazy talk is that?

      Think about who you're talking about.

      They don't use soap.
    8. Re:Voyager is going to keep its record... by WheresMyDingo · · Score: 1

      v'ger approaching heliopause... anyone empathically connected should watch out for some serious mood swings.

    9. Re:Voyager is going to keep its record... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Technically, the Voyager probes use radioisotope thermoelectric generators, which can produce 80% of its full-rated power even 20 years after initial assembly of power generator. It's likely that the Voyager probes will continue to work for at least another 30 years or more!

      It will be very interesting to see how long Cassini--which is powered by RTG's--continue to run orbiting Saturn.

    10. Re:Voyager is going to keep its record... by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Not really, in all likelihood. Cassini's lifetime is more likely to be limited by its supply of reaction mass for maneuvering or the speed at which its reaction wheels degrade. The RTG's life expectancy is something like 20+ years, if I recall right from when I asked about this a month ago during the extended mission planning at JPL. If we make it sufficiently far that the RTG is a limiting factor on the mission, I'll be shocked. Pleasantly so, but shocked.
      Also, remember that the rate at which the RTGs degrade is a fairly easy thing to model. There aren't a lot of components to go bad, so you're mostly just looking at radioactive decay times. Compare that to how long it takes a moving part to break or radiation damage to destroy electronics and you see that the modeling for the RTG is a cake walk.

    11. Re:Voyager is going to keep its record... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Horizons launched early this year has a Thermoelectric generator. Most craft going to the outer solar system and beyond have had and will need them, not enough sunlight there for consistant solar array power generation.

    12. Re:Voyager is going to keep its record... by indigest · · Score: 1

      Wow, I had no idea that the Voyager probes are powered by radioactive material. How bad would the fallout have been if there had been an explosion in Earth's atmosphere?

    13. Re:Voyager is going to keep its record... by Phist · · Score: 1

      How can any argument against nuclear power being used in space be valid considering that earth orbits a huge nuclear reactor? I mean, if there is anywhere in the universe where nuclear power could be used, wouldn't it be in space?

  34. So what's the point in trying to see it, anyway? by Myself · · Score: 0

    Okay, trying to take pictures of Beagle 2 was useful, because it could tell us whether the panels unfolded and give hints of the failure mode for consideration in future designs.

    But what's the point of trying to take pictures of an orbiting craft? What useful data will we glean, if successful, that would either help restore MGS to functionality or inform future activity?

  35. Success! by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Mars Anti Satellite Command (MASC) reports another successful test of the new anti-satellite interceptor.

  36. Re:So what's the point in trying to see it, anyway by dsci · · Score: 0

    Perhaps to just know that it is still there and has not been (completely) destroyed. Knowing it is still there might justify continued efforts to contact it.

    And sometimes when you lots of dollars and man-centuries invested in something, you just want to know what happened to it.

    --
    Computational Chemistry products and services.
  37. Re:What is with Mars? by Rakishi · · Score: 1

    I'd like to also add that it's the next most likely planet to which we send a manned mission, for the above reasons and it's the most likely planet for possible future colonization. All things considered it's probably the best candidate for exploration right now, close and somewhat similar but quite different from Earth as well.

  38. Re:This article reminds you that DEATH is FOREVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Death to Videodrome! Long live The New flesh!

  39. Re:What is with Mars? by wateriestfire · · Score: 0

    So... I guess the moon isn't close enough? Future colonization of any planet besides our own is the most ridiculus thing I have ever heard of. The moral and scientific issues it brings up are so crazy I choose not even to discuss them.

  40. Re:What is with Mars? by camperdave · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There truly is nothing more to see on that rock, for we have all seen the countless images from mars.

    We've all seen pictures of the top of Mt Everest. Does that mean we should no longer climb mountains? We have seen pictures of the ocean floor. Should we no longer SCUBA dive? By no means! We explore because it is human nature to test our limits, to push the boundaries, to boldly go where no man has gone before.

    We have not even seen one tenth of one percent of the Martian surface, yet there "is nothing more to see". Olympus Mons is the largest volcano in the Solar System, three times as tall as Mt Everest, but who cares. There is nothing to see. Tourists flock by the millions each year to take in the Grand Canyon. The Valles Marineris is the deepest canyon system in the Solar System. Five times deeper, and hundreds of times longer, it makes the Grand Canyon look like a tire rut. But who cares. We've seen a few pictures of a couple of Martian rocks, so there's no point in going to the Valles Marineris. Well, Here's a picture of some Earth rocks, and here's a link to some maps. So now you don't ever have to leave your house.

    As for Mars being lifeless, we do not *know* that there is no life on Mars. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Why, Opportunity could find lichen on a rock tomorrow afternoon.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  41. Re:Anybody going to miss it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume you're talking about heightmap data, possibly with surface mapped photos?

    Doesn't NASA have this catalog for Earth somewhere? I know the Venusian version is available from somewhere (not sure if it's NASA, the USGS, or someone else, and not sure if it's free to download) but I'm curious if that type of data is available for Earth, and if it's public domain/accessible from NASA's or the JPL's website.

  42. Maybe we should wait for Google Mars... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

    It's very clear -- the probe swept over an area that the owners didn't want surveyed, and set up us the bomb. Great justice was served.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:Maybe we should wait for Google Mars... by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Funny

      Alternatively, maybe it just had a Sony battery... Have any flashes of light or smoke been spotted above Mars recently ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  43. Re:Anybody going to miss it? by rk · · Score: 1

    Um, actually, yeah. I have a couple friends who are probably going to be out of a job now. So, approve or disapprove of it, the fact remains somebody's going to miss it.

  44. It was probably just slashdotted... by Ixitar · · Score: 0

    Give us a URL to it and we will destroy it.

  45. Re:So what's the point in trying to see it, anyway by lindsley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Same thing. First, verify it's where it's supposed to be. Second, if the resolution is good enough (and they weren't sure it would be) see if it seems to be oriented correctly.

    If it's not where it's supposed to be, then there's a partial explanation of why it's not responding -- it's off course -- and also tells them their options are limited to setting it straight again. If it is, but it's oriented incorrectly, then the batteries are not getting recharged and you focus on getting it oriented correctly so it can get power again. If it is present, oriented correctly, and still not responding, then you've got a different set of options.

    More information can only help.

  46. Re:What is with Mars? by toadlife · · Score: 1
    "The moral and scientific issues it brings up are so crazy I choose not even to discuss them."


    Damn you! I was ready to ask you what moral and scientific issues you were talking about, but since you don't want to discuss them, I will forever be left with a feeling of emptiness, knowing that the insight you choose to hold back will forever be barred from influencing the collective wisdom of the common man.
    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  47. I call shenanigans by patio11 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Aside from the general difficulty of firing government workers, nobody is going to lose their jobs over happening to be around when a mission which had gone years past its planned expiration date finally winked out of existence. At worst they'll have a few weeks of sitting around the office watching the computer screens, then they'll be reassigned to another NASA project. Not that I really think NASA engineers would be in a terrible place if the agency suddenly vanished tomorrow. After all, they're rocket scientists. I'm sure they can work something out. (Yeah, I know, NASA also employs janitors and cafeteria workers and techs. So does the rest of the world. You don't need to have anything orbiting a celestial body to pay someone to move a broom around.)

    1. Re:I call shenanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might be true for the other NASA centers and their mass of civil servants, but JPL employees work for Caltech and are technically contractors. When a project ends there might not be something else to go to.

    2. Re:I call shenanigans by rk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Implicit in your assumption is that a mission is operated solely by NASA civil service employees, which is a handy assumption for your flip answer, but meanwhile, back in the real world, that's not the case. I'll grant that the people who will be affected have some warning, but I guarantee you Griffin and Co. are already planning on where to reallocate the extended mission money if and when they declare MGS dead. That money doesn't all go to NASA facilities. The science operations for the Mars Orbiter Camera goes to a small company and the Thermal Emission Spectrometer money goes to Arizona State's Mars Space Flight Facility, a place I worked for 4 years and personally witnessed several people get laid off in early '06 because of NASA reallocation for the new manned program and to pay for hurricane damages to NASA facilities.

      Yeah, I'm sure the people who got laid off worked something out, and the people who will get laid off will work something out, too. You can continue to choose to "call shenanigans" all you want, but you asked a question, I answered, you didn't like the answer and decided to wave it away with flippant handwaving. This has effects on real people and your "rational ignorance" becomes willful ignorance if you choose to continue to deny it.

  48. Re:Anybody going to miss it? by VultureMN · · Score: 2, Funny

    I personally think it's all gone downhill since that whole silly "multicellular" craze. Phffft.

  49. Re:What is with Mars? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

    "Future colonization of any planet besides our own is the most ridiculus thing I have ever heard of."

    If we don't spread humanity to other planets, humanity is doomed, period. It's as simple as that. Currently we have all our eggs in one basket, and we are kicking that basket around for shit 'n giggles. And if we don't manage to wipe us out by ourselves, we will eventually get hit by a planet-busting asteroid.

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  50. Well, I, for one... by SpanishArcher · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our alien probe stealing overlords... ...forgive me, I always wanted to do this :D

    --
    640KB of virtualized ram will be enough for everybody
  51. Re:So what's the point in trying to see it, anyway by uhfsatcom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hi, yes looking at the spacecraft over a few frames would give you the opportunity to work out the orbit of the s/c. Once the rough orbit is known, the doppler shift can be worked out, and therefore the frequency. MGS has also been heard by radio hams, so its possible that some could watch for a signal. http://www.uhf-satcom.com/mgs/ has some info on the signals detected from MGS earlier this year. Lets hope NASA manages to either image this s/c, or chat to it with one of the rovers.

  52. more like... by sporkme · · Score: 1

    shucks, and awwwwwww.

    nice try. no politics here, move along.

  53. Re:Anybody going to miss it? by azeazezar · · Score: 1

    Who needs DNA?? I remember the days when ...

    --
    We are the BORG, put this in your sig and prepare to be assimilated
  54. quote from the latest AP news! by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the Associated Pres news:

    "We have gathered information from inside NASA, that during the last minutes of contacts the Mars Global Surveyor sent out an encrypted message. After a grueling three hours trying to decrypt the message, top scientists at NASA was startled to see what appears to be a message from semi-intelligent beings. It reads 'How are you gentlemen!! All your base are belong to us.' Then the MGS went silent.
    Governments of the United States and Western Europe have moved to take of every zig. Although it is widely believed that we have no chance to survive make our time, the scientists insist that we must indeed move zig.


    God help us

  55. Just like in Star Trek V-GER!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... lost Probe, found by aliens and then it will come back... ... converted... ... in SURVYR!

    Which of course will be a new motorola phone model ;)

  56. Ah, my poor old 7th grade science teacher. by Ewann · · Score: 1

    We asked her a lot of questions when we were studying the planets. Poor old woman. It only took her a week of Uranus questions before she caught on.

    Q: If we sent a probe to Uranus, would it ever come back?

    A: No, it wouldn't.

    Q: Does Uranus have a lot of gasses?

    A: Yes, there is a lot of methane and sulfur.

    Q: Is there a ring around Uranus?

    A: No, I don't think so, but we can check.

    Q: Is Uranus cold?

    A: Yes, it's extremely frigid.

    etc

  57. missing or ... by TheCybernator · · Score: 1

    ... is it kidnapped? by alien?

    has NASA received a ransom call?

  58. It had enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " "Spirit has been displaying some anomalous behavior," said Project Manager John Callas, who noted the rover's unsuccessful attempts to flip itself over and otherwise damage its scientific instruments. "And the thousand or so daily messages of 'STILL NO WATER' really point to a crisis of purpose." "

    http://www.theonion.com/content/node/54360

  59. Could have been smacked by a rock... by Archeopteryx · · Score: 1

    Which would account for not seeing it where expected...

    --
    Dog is my co-pilot.
  60. swapmeet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.ebay.mars

  61. Its right here!!! by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    Snarbledorf and Veedlemore decided to use it to refuel their spacecraft, which i'm currently on.. now let me take this probe out from where the sun don't shine.

  62. Re:What is with Mars? by khallow · · Score: 1

    The moral and scientific issues it brings up are so crazy I choose not even to discuss them.

    That's classic. I think I'll sig it, if it doesn't end up too long. While many moral and scientific "issues" (I assume you mean "reasons not to go") are crazy, the legitimate ones are not. For example, if Martian life exists, then it's probably completely incompatible with Terran life. And there probably won't be much in the way of competition between the two. But it could still be the case that one branch of life is strictly better than the other. In which case, the losing ecosystem could potentially be replaced by the other. If Martian life gets replaced by more aggressive Earth life then that's a loss of tremendous scientific value. If it goes the other way, then that could one of the worst disasters the Solar System will ever see. OTOH, maybe you're just one of those people who thinks humans should rot on Earth till they "learn" whatever it is that will make certain people feel better about humanity. Or maybe that the money that could go into humanity's future is better spent on counterproductive efforts to fail to get people out of poverty. That's crazy issues.

    Anyway, I tend to agree with your assessment of the Moon versus Mars. The economics of going to the Moon make more sense. It's close to Earth physically (and to the most valuable real estate in the Solar System). It's closer than Mars in terms of moving stuff (orbital dynamics) to Earth orbit or to Earth.

    OTOH, I see a compelling reason for going to both the Moon and Mars - once the cost of putting something in LEO is significantly cheaper. There's too much interesting stuff in both locations to just leave them alone. We should understand Mars and any potential Martian ecosystem better (and understand better human physiology in low gravity environments) before we put heavy effort into colonization. But I don't see real obstacles unless Martian life is somehow extremely dangerous to Earth life.
  63. five times expected lifetime by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Cheers to great engineers at NASA.

  64. Someone forgot to shout "Fore!" by VinB · · Score: 0

    Probably the result of some space golf shot that sliced 5 or 6 years prior and knocked it out of orbit. That's why they're trying the stunt again. *This* time they won't slice!

  65. Ten years? by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    If in fact it has been up for ten years, that is a pretty good lifespan for an orbiter going around one of the rocky planets.

    What's really amazing are those little rovers on the surface. Those definitely have Energizer Bunny Syndrome. In reality it is a tribute to the engineering.

  66. Not if we side with autobots by microbee · · Score: 1

    But we have to act fast.

  67. Ooh-err by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

    The transhumanist in me finds it rather touching that a team of men and machines spread across two different planets is searching for one lost member.

    --
    Do you see what I did there?