Slashdot Mirror


PS3 Missed Ship Targets, Loses Exclusives

Sony's having a rough week. After shootings on launch day and a harsh review from the New York Times, Bloomberg is now calling Sony out as having completely missed its shipping targets. The analyst company says there may have been as few as 50% of aimed-for units available, and that the company may only get about 200,000 units to stores by the end of the year (something Sony flatly denies). PS3 fans now also have to deal with the fact that Koei is cross-platforming two previously exclusive titles. Fatal Inertia and Bladestorm are now in development for the 360 as well, marking the latest in a string of titles that have slipped away from Sony. There is some consolation for the company to take away from this week, though. They did better than Microsoft last week in Japan, with around 81,000 PS3s, 19,000 PSPs, and 16,000 PS2s sold to a mere 4,000 Xbox 360s and ... 4 Xboxes.

173 comments

  1. Nice BS numbers from Japan. by kinglink · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why don't we get USEFUL numbers. Sony launches a console, Microsoft has a console that's been out for a year. Why do we expect Microsoft's console to sell as many?

    In america the amount of consoles Microsoft sell weekly isn't that many (probably 5 digits on a good week, but not much more)

    Of course it wouldn't be 1up article if it was biased in some random direction.

    Then again Microsoft's numbers are picking up in preperation for Blue Dragon, only a couple monthes ago they were barely breaking 1K units. However now it's much more.

    1. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that the Japanese are very unlikely to buy an imported good that isn't from a Japanese-owned foreign interest anyway. I'm surprised that MS has any sales there at all.

    2. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by Baldrake · · Score: 5, Informative
      Not to mention that the Japanese are very unlikely to buy an imported good that isn't from a Japanese-owned foreign interest anyway. I'm surprised that MS has any sales there at all.

      You mean like the iPod?

      Please, this constant repetition that the Japanese are xenophobic when it comes to electronics is terrifically boring, and worse, counter-productive. It's as bad as the auto makers who blame xenophobia for why they aren't able to sell the Chrysler Neon in Japan.

    3. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      >Why don't we get USEFUL numbers. Sony launches a console, Microsoft has a console that's been out for a year. Why do we expect Microsoft's console to sell as many?
      Wait, what about the PS2 number which is a 4:1 ratio with the Xbox/Xbox360's number? The PS2 has been out for how long, 5 years, why is it outselling the xbox360's number with a huge ratio still?

    4. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Could be worse. A system that was released almost a year ago (it was a year ago yesterday), and refreshed in a slightly nicer form factor could outsell the entire brand: http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/17/japanese-hardwar e-sales-6-november-12-november-new-contender/ .. Yes, that's right. the DS Lite outsold all sony gaming products combined.

    5. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Amen!

      Besides, when there was a special limited edition bundle of the 360 and the new RPG, Blue Dragon, all 100,000 units sold out in one day. Clearly the Japanese are willing to buy a console regardless of who makes it - you just gotta give them a reason (GAMES).

    6. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by Mr.+Samuel · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Why don't we get USEFUL numbers. Sony launches a console, Microsoft has a console that's been out for a year. Why do we expect Microsoft's console to sell as many?

      This is an excellent question, and I can only assume the answer is one of two things:

      1. For some reason, gaming site users have an insatiable appetite for fuel to the "console war" fire, perhaps with little regard for the accuracy of said fuel.

      2. See #1.

      Imagine what the world might accomplish if the energy we put into worrying about which console was teh winnar was put into, oh, say, discussing what operating system sucks the mostest.

    7. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by drc003 · · Score: 1

      You fail to mention that it shows PS2 sales. I believe it launched 6 years ago and has sales of 16,000 compared to 4,004 for 360 and Xbox combined. You seem to be as biased as you claim 1up is if you think those numbers were useless. Especially considering they were simply being used following the statement that Sony did better than MS in Japan this week. Obviously they did that on PS2 sales alone. As for me I could care less. With a PC and Nintendo Wii at my disposal I see no use for either of those overpriced boxes at the moment. I'll probably grab one late next year after a price drop and a clearer picture of each consoles spot in the market.

    8. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by kinglink · · Score: 1

      See that's a completely valid question (though the other side is, there's more games for it). However acting like this is useful data in showing that the PS3 is better than the 360 is pointless. Bill Gates said it, and I hate to quote him or paraphrase him but he nailed it on the head. "Sony can make 80,000 bricks, and people would buy them."

      While the data is completely valid, the conclusions someone might draw from them are not, and when 1up is saying the ps3 is doing better, it's not even technically valid unless you'd take the speed of everyone in a f1 race as the first driver drives over the finish line and then claim "Scott Speed won the race from 20th place. Because he was going 2 miles per hour faster then everyone else". I wouldn't do that, you shouldn't either.

    9. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is the PS2 selling at all with the PS3 available? Stupid troll.

    10. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by cowscows · · Score: 1

      I'm just surprised that anyone still has the old xbox's for sale in Japan. I'd have thought they'd have buried all the leftovers in a landfill somewhere.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    11. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by cowscows · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fuck you, BSD is better than Nintendo and you know it!

      And the PS3 controllers have a way better button layout than an Apple mouse. So much for cupertino's vaunted user friendliness.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    12. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by Emetophobe · · Score: 1
      >Why don't we get USEFUL numbers. Sony launches a console, Microsoft has a console that's been out for a year. Why do we expect Microsoft's console to sell as many?
      Wait, what about the PS2 number which is a 4:1 ratio with the Xbox/Xbox360's number? The PS2 has been out for how long, 5 years, why is it outselling the xbox360's number with a huge ratio still?

      That's not really a fair comparison to make. The newer, slim PS2 costs around $130, where as the xbox 360 is $400 or more. Also, a lot of the older PS2 games are $20 or less. If you are a parent with young kids, are you going to spend $200 for a PS2 with 3-5 games, or $400+ for a xbox 360 with no games.
    13. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The expression is couldn't care less.

    14. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by catprog · · Score: 1

      That was only pre-orders that sold out in a day but your point is still valid

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
    15. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by catprog · · Score: 1

      The DS Lite out sold everything (not just sony's) by about 24K

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
    16. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by toiletsalmon · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't get me wrong, but where do you draw the line between xenophobia and Japan just being...well..Fing WEIRD. Like I said, don't get me wrong. I've got nothing against Japan, but hell. Their tastes are so "excentric" (from our perspective) that without inside information from someone who understands Japanese culture, I don't know if it would be reasonable to expect anyone to be able to tell when a Japanese consumer won't buy something because it's not Japanese, or if they won't buy something because they just don't like it. Doesn't that essentially equate to them not liking stuff because it's not Japanese???

    17. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by shawb · · Score: 1

      I really doubt it. Japan doesn't have THAT much landfill space.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    18. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by SQLz · · Score: 1

      Kids have to worry about enough these days without getting beat up at school because they don't have the latest console.

    19. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by mrchaotica · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      If you are a parent with young kids, are you going to spend $200 for a PS2 with 3-5 games, or $400+ for a xbox 360 with no games.

      Was that supposed to be a question?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    20. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by fbjon · · Score: 1

      I think you're the one who's weird, no?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    21. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1

      No actually. But it's all about perspective, no?

    22. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Because it has more and better games available (and still coming out for some time) while costing much less and being easy to get?

      When a new system comes out the old system's sales don't immediately drop to zero. And I'm not sure if I'd call the PS3 available, either.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    23. Re:Nice BS numbers from Japan. by FateStayNight · · Score: 1

      Microsoft can talk, making inferior products and still having market lead.

  2. Sony Style Store just had some by mihalis · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was just in the Sony Style store at 550 Madison Avenue (Sony's US headquarters) and they were selling PS3s. There was a line of about 15 people (ok, men) at the checkout, which is highly unusual in my experience (I shop there regularly) and the staff behind the desk had some PS3s sitting on the floor ready to be handed over. The boxes go out in a distinctive black bag with PS3 graphics on it.

    1. Re:Sony Style Store just had some by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Funny

      So basically the bags are mobile adverts that scream "mug me!"

    2. Re:Sony Style Store just had some by Overzeetop · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The boxes go out in a distinctive black bag with PS3 graphics on it.

      Does it also say "Steal Me!" in bright graphics, too?

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Sony Style Store just had some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically the bags are mobile adverts that scream "mug me!"

      In New York, every bag says this except for a brown paper one.

    4. Re:Sony Style Store just had some by Fozzyuw · · Score: 4, Funny
      The boxes go out in a distinctive black bag with PS3 graphics on it.

      It could be worse... they could buy it from Target!

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    5. Re:Sony Style Store just had some by CelticLo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was in the Hong Kong sony Style store looking for more games two days after launch. (They only had Tiger Woods and Genji only, no other stores had software.) I saw the same thing as you, people buying PS3s after the launchday, I went over to enquire to find out this was people picking pre-orders and using their credit cards to confirm identity.

  3. Other PS3 problems of note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    In addition to the problems mentioned in the article I have been noticing quite a few other issues with the PS3 at this point. Here is a listing of a few of the problems reported already:

    - Poor backward compatilibity with PS1 and PS2 games (http://www.gamespot.com/news/6136677.html)

    - Numerous high def upscaling issues including PS3 BluRay movies not appearing in high definition properly (http://loot-ninja.com/2006/11/19/ps3-hd-scaling-i ssues-other-annoyances/)

    - A very poor online system, as compared to the Xbox Live System (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/20/arts/20game.htm l)

    - No high definition cables ship with the system, you are stuck with a composite cable unless you pay extra (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/20/arts/20game.htm l)

    - Poor graphics on side to side game comparison tests: http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/sports/tonyhawksprojec t8/review.html?sid=6161341

    - Poor framerates and "tearing" reported on multiple game titles, including Tony Hawk and Mobile Suit Gundam: Crossfire (http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/sim/gundamworld/revie w.html)

    - Poor buggy development tools which make development very hard as compared to other current gen systems (http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=19611&he d=Atari+Founder+Likes+Xbox360%2C+Disses+PS3&sector =Industries&subsector=EntertainmentAndMedia)

    - Multiple launch titles cancelled or delayed due to development issues (http://www.gamesarefun.com/news.php?newsid=7200)

    With the Xbox 360 already having 7 million units sold worldwide, the Wii approximately 600,000 units, and the PS3 only having sold 200,000 units in North America and 80,000 units in Japan and none in Europe it is hard to see Sony succeeding with the PS3. The PS3 may be the largest disaster yet for Sony this year, with each PS3 losing $306 for Sony (http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2006/11/16/ps3-l oses-up-to-306-per-unit-xbox-360-profits-76-per-sa le.htm) and the PS3 having the lowest attach rate (0.98) of any launch in the industry, including the original XBox.

    1. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by Control+Group · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, is this only the second time you've posted this exact comment, or have I missed others?

      I'd accuse you of karma whoring, but people normally log in for that.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    2. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've seen this exact same comment posted on multiple sites in the past couple of days.

      Usually someone corrects the lies, like the terrible >97.5% backwards compatibility (compared to the 30% XBox360 backward compatibility).

    3. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by grommit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's funny how the poster is talking about "poor backward compatability" when quite a few users have said that they're minor issues for the most part. Certain titles are unplayable but Sony has said that they're planning on fixing those issues.

      Oh, then there's the "numerous" hi-def scaling issues which is really just the same issue (once again, goint to be patched soon) happening to multiple titles.

      This guy should be writing for some political or marketing company. He's got the "take a minor issue and blow it out of proportion using clever wording" down to a T.

    4. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by Perseid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      - Poor backward compatilibity with PS1 and PS2 games
      - Numerous high def upscaling issues including PS3 BluRay movies not appearing in high definition properly

      Both of which are most likely fixable through firmware upgrades. Especially the compatibility which is supposed to be fixed in short order.

      - Poor graphics on side to side game comparison tests
      - Poor framerates and "tearing" reported on multiple game titles, including Tony Hawk and Mobile Suit Gundam: Crossfire

      I say this a lot. Maybe I should make it my sig. Launch titles suck. Always. It's a fact of life. These games are not representative of the system. Play Kileak for the PS1 and Evergrace for the PS2 and get back to me.

      - Poor buggy development tools which make development very hard as compared to other current gen systems
      - Multiple launch titles cancelled or delayed due to development issues

      When the PS2 was in development the developers of Oddworld were working on the third game for the PS2 when they suddenly announced that they were switching to an XBox exclusive because the PS2 was too hard to code for. This of course sent the game media into a frenzy. And look at where we are now.

      And finally the losses-per-system articles all use fuzzy numbers. Many of these devices are patented and manufactured by Sony themselves and nobody outside of Sony knows exactly how much it costs Sony to manufacture said device. Microsoft on the other hand mainly assembles their systems based on parts that they have to buy. I'm not saying the 360 costs more to build than the PS3, I am merely saying that you me and whoever iSuppli are don't know how much they really DO cost.

      Me, I'm going to play the waiting game to see who comes out on top. But while Sony certainly has screwed this up I don't see any real indicators yet that they are going to lose.

    5. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think people should know about the PS3 problems. My post is on-topic and is completely relevant to the discussion at hand. Not everyone has seen my prior post. I'm not interested in Karma Whoring, which is why I didn't log in. I am interested in people knowing the problems that the PS3 is having so that they can make informed decisions about their $600 purchase. Is that wrong?

      And no, Sony isn't dying. They have plenty of revenue streams to tap from. I never said that. I said the PS3 has problems and I backed it up with links to relevant articles.

      Please refute any of my points and I will listen. Saying "its gonna be fixed soon in a firmware update" is not a refutation. If/when that happens I will re-evaluate the worthiness of the PS3.

    6. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by MSFanBoi2 · · Score: 1

      Actually the Xbox 360 number is closer to 73%.

      Now mind you Sony actually INCLUDED PS2 hardware in the PS3 to play back PS2 games...

      Microsoft does it via software emulation.

      Looks to me that Sony has some serious issues if they cannot get PS2 games to work on PS2 hardware...

    7. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by AArmadillo · · Score: 1

      The reason why fans and foes alike are complaining about the backwards compatibility problems is because it has seemed to hit the more popular games. For example, the Final Fantasy series is apparently all broken to one degree or another, with XI not even playable.

    8. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am interested in people knowing the problems that the PS3 is having so that they can make informed decisions about their $600 purchase. Is that wrong?

      Your selfless concern is touching.

      Please refute any of my points and I will listen. Saying "its gonna be fixed soon in a firmware update" is not a refutation.

      Not a refutation, but a mitigating point, to be sure. Each new console has issues that will be corrected with firmware updates. This is a good thing.

      Ok I'll bite:

      Poor backward compatilibity with PS1 and PS2 games

      About 98% of previous titles play just fine. Some have sync issues with FMV sequences, which do not affect gameplay (and yes, will be fixed). This is not 'poor compatibility'. Go check Sony's game database if you like, they have a tool for this.

      Numerous high def upscaling issues including PS3 BluRay movies not appearing in high definition properly

      Again, disingenuous. Some older model HDTVs don't do 720p, and there is an issue with that particular resolution on those particular sets. And fixable. Considering the very small installed base of total HDTVs, this strikes me as a fairly minor problem (although irritating to be sure). And that is the only problem, not 'numerous'.

      A very poor online system, as compared to the Xbox Live System

      I agree. Both the Wii and PS3 online capabilities are inferior to Microsoft's network.

      No high definition cables ship with the system, you are stuck with a composite cable unless you pay extra

      While I agree that the high-end SKU bundle should have included these, you surely must agree that most people would end up throwing this cable away. Nintendo doesn't even think you need to buy one from a store. (Or at all, until December.)

      Poor graphics on side to side game comparison tests

      For that game. Talk about intellectually dishonest, you act like its an exhaustive comparison.

      Poor framerates and "tearing" reported on multiple game titles, including Tony Hawk and Mobile Suit Gundam: Crossfire

      Yeah, maybe. Had some slowdown on Gears of War, too. Tony Hawk, being a cross-platform franchise, perhaps had the least amount of time for a PS3 port. Gundam just plain sucks. But point taken.

      Poor buggy development tools which make development very hard as compared to other current gen systems

      Remind me again, why do we care what Nolan Bushnell thinks of the PS3 dev environment?

      Remind me again, why do WE care about the dev environment? How is that warning consumers of the dangers of the PS3?

      Multiple launch titles cancelled or delayed due to development issues

      Scrapin' the bottom of the barrel, here. Newsflash: software doesn't tend to ship on time. I'm not excusing them but this is hardly anything new.

      Tell me, what is it when you remove a title from your previous console's dev roster so you can push it as a launch title for the next console?

      With the Xbox 360 already having 7 million units sold worldwide blahblahblah attachrate balhblah (snipped)

      The fact is, you are looking at two console launches only a week out. And considering the shortages, the data is skewed anyhow. You cannot project this out in a linear fashion. For instance what do you make of the fact that the PS3 and the DS are in American kids Top 10 Xmas Gifts list and the Wii is no where to be found?

      What you are doing is called cherry-picking. You can do this to anything and make it look bad. Hey, what's with the Wii? No component cables for sale until December, and even

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    9. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > - Poor backward compatilibity with PS1 and PS2 games
      What 3% of all titles created are having troubles??? How is that poor?
      Wake up and smell the coffee and see that Sony posted a list of games that don't work and not a list of games that do. Look at the list of games that don't work, most are not hot sellers in the first place. Also if you look at the list MS provides for the xbox360, it is a list of games that work and it is about as long as games that don't work on the PS3.
      Also Sony is fixing up problems with backwards compatibility for most of those 200 games. Now is MS doing that, no.

    10. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
      3rd party launch titles tend to suck, but smart companies have at least one hot title scheduled for release at their hardware launch, that's how they plan to sell the hardware. ex. Virtua Fighter for the Saturn, Soul Caliber for the DC, Super Mario World for the SNES, Super Mario 64 for the N64, Halo for the XBOX.

      Of course, there are consoles that fail to do this, and surprisingly enough they ah...fail. ex. Cybermorph for the Jaguar, Sewer Shark for the Sega CD, Doom for the 32X, Coincidence?

      I say this a lot. Maybe I should make it my sig. Launch titles suck. Always. It's a fact of life. These games are not representative of the system. Play Kileak for the PS1 and Evergrace for the PS2 and get back to me.
    11. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by scot4875 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your rebuttal reeks of as much optimism as the original poster's did of pessimism.

      There are numerous, deep flaws with the PS3 and with Sony's strategy over the last year. No amount of rationalization changes that.

      Yes, I'm a Nintendo fan. Despite my poor experience with the PS1, I was also very excited about the PS2 -- until I saw that Sony was lying about it. This time around they're just being even more blatant.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    12. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by bishiraver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Remind me again, why do WE care about the dev environment? How is that warning consumers of the dangers of the PS3?"

      Because poor dev environments caused the downfall of several historic game consoles. See: Sega Saturn.

      While there were other issues with the Saturn, such as dev libraries being difficult to get ahold of... development of Sega Saturn cross platform titles often meant spending several extra months of development on the Saturn compared to, say, the PS1. It was one of the primary reasons the Saturn failed (along with its high initial pricetag, and difficulty getting hands on dev kits in the first place, low number of game releases outside of japan.. all of which except the last sound eerily familiar when looked at in context of the PS3).

      Ease of system development is very important in forecasting how well third party developers will attach to a system. That's why it's important for a consumer to take into account on initial release. After a year or two when it becomes obvious which system will have better developer support, it can be safely ignored. But what we're trying to do is forecast which will be the one that will have the most numbers sold.

      On a sidenote, one of the reasons the PS2 caught on initially and sold a huge number of units was adding DVD. At least, in Japan. DVD technology hadn't caught on huge there yet, and that coupled with several exclusive RPGs (squeenix, etc) cemented its success in Japan. This to some extent also helped it sell well in the US. It's what they're trying to do again with the Blu-ray, but unfortunately the blu-ray technology doesn't have a firm foothold in one of their markets already. Blu-ray movies are few and far between, compared to a point when DVDs were being sold like hotcakes - at least, for US movies. This, along with the production woes, make them introducing a new format much more risky at this point in time.

      And about your point about the 'top ten xmas gifts':

      The kids polled are probably very young. While this is one of the targets of the Wii, I can definitely see how the PS3 came on the list, and the DS as well - without the Wii.

      You have to look at where the youngin's are getting their information, and keep in fact that they're more impressionable by the media than your typical teenage/adult gamer. They hear 'blazingly fast' and 'not much faster than the gamecube' and they go apeshit. They list the DS because they've seen older kids at school with them, or schoolmates with them, or they've played their friends DS, etc. You have to keep in mind that younger kids see a bunch of people with something and say "Those are cool! Everyone has one! I want one too!" rather than making a truly informed decision based on market level projections, hardware issues/points, games, etc.

      As a sidenote, I like how legos are up there on the list ;)

    13. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha fanboy with your illogical arguments. have fun with your $600 dud!!! LOL

    14. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by deepb · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Your rebuttal reeks of as much optimism as the original poster's did of pessimism.
      Sounded pretty logical to me.

      Yes, I'm a Nintendo fan.
      Really? Never would have guessed..
    15. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOLOL
      Looks like we got a member of SDF (Sony Defense Force) on our hands!
      Take your head out of Sony's rectum before you suffocate.

    16. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Blu-ray movies are few and far between, compared to a point when DVDs were being sold like hotcakes - at least, for US movies. This, along with the production woes, make them introducing a new format much more risky at this point in time.

      Well, that and the fact that nobody gives a flip about HD movies anyway. With the video tape->DVD transition, the biggest draw for normal people (i.e., not audiophiles) was simply not having to rewind the stupid thing, not the better A/V quality. Blu-ray has no similar tangible advantage, so people don't care.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    17. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      re:"Remind me again, why do we care what Nolan Bushnell thinks of the PS3 dev environment?"

      Because I'd never be able to play PONG or BREAKOUT on my PS3!

    18. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You really should've gotten that PS2, man. That's certainly the best console available today if believe a console's merit comes from its games. Hell, you probably should go get a PS2 today. Much wiser purchase than a Wii, and most people out there agree with me. 300 bucks gets a new PS2 and seven top notch games. And people out there simply refuse to see that this is why the PS3 delays and production slowness aren't major problems, the PS2 is carrying the PS3's costs on its shoulders.

      The PS3 is the pop culture item. Everyone wants one. In Europe, in Japan, and to lesser extent but still certainly in North America. If sony can manage to make any of these things, they will sell. Sony was wise to wait so long to get most of the kinks worked out of this program. Unlike Microsoft, sony wasn't trying to replace a sinking ship with a good console, Sony was trying to replace the most dominating console in gaming history.

      No flaws in Sony's strategy. Sony consoles sold more than any other brand this year. Sony games sold more than any other console line too. PS2 is where its at. If some knucklehead out there wants to buy a PS3 now, well there's a large price to pay for that. Sony doesn't care than I'm going to wait it out and keep buying PS2 games and consider a PS3 later doen the road. Why would they care? That means more money for Sony. I'll get a PS3 when they have cheaper production costs.

      But to buy a Wii? Why? It's not innovative, it's not a new platform, it's a gamecube and a powerglove ripoff. Is the Wii really better than the venerable Playstation 2?

      As far as the XBOX 360 goes, well it's clearly the best system on the market. It's got all the capability and an improving library and the best online experience. But I'm still happy with my PS2 for now. I'm also worried that Microsoft will repeat its past history and move to another platform quickly. Original XBOX owners got shafted. PS2 owners certainly did not (if their system stayed working like mine did anyway)

      Sony is actually being brilliant here. Sony is trading some of it's PS3 success to cement Bluray. It's going to work (internet movies suck on large screens and will for at least several years). PS2 will hold down the fort, and any scrutiny of why Sony has waited so long to enter the market should remember that PS2 will net a fuckton more money from license and hardware than 360 or Wii will this year or next. 100 million systems buys a lot more games for middle/lower class folks than a few million 360's and wii's will.

    19. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was this modded down? Its grandparent post did in fact make sense, it wasn't overly optimistic, and this post simply rebutted a bizarre criticism.

      Nothing about this rebuttal was printed elsewhere- how was this "redundant" in any way?

      Nintendo fans? Strange. Nintendo is supposed to be the nice-guy system, right? "Itsa me! Mario!" Where did all these nintendo folk get this anger?

    20. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got one good rebuttal: Sony made money this year. Even with all the expense of setting and building all those PS3's they made money without selling a single one because they make so much money on movies music and Playstation 1 and 2 games. Buisinesses exist to make money. Unlike Microsoft, Sony hasn't lost money by entering the game market.

      Nintendo made the Playstation with its shoddy business policy. The Playstion (original one) would not have existed if Nintendo had followed through with Sony's SNES-CD program. And nintendo didn't just screw Sony over, they screwed over developers. Final Fantasy 7, Metal Gear Solid, etc. These games came to Sony because they were running from nintendo's cutthroat policies. nintendo treats its customers great, but it plays hardball with busines partners and that's the truly astonishing business policy flaw if you're keen on scrutinizing companies that make half a billion in their worst quarter of deep investment.

      We'll see of course. PS3 is really just a delivery for bluray, clearly uneeded, but probably a big seller once HD takes off. It's going to be a chicken/egg issue. The PS3 is establishing Blueray- and Bluray will establish the PS3. It's clearly more sophisticated of a strategy than, say, motion sensing or online experience (both are easily replicated). Sony has a pretty good plan in a difficult industry. Anyone who can't acknowledge this is probably narrow minded.

      Do you just not like Sony? Are they bad because bloggers and slashdot bigwigs told you they had awful business practices? Amazing how some business errors are reported quite loudly while others aren't. Almost as if some bloggers and other media gatekeepers (speaking hyperbolically) had an incentive to skew the news. I mean, it's not like Microsoft is paying them or giving them televisions sets or anything. (hmmph)

    21. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Dangit, I -liked- Evergrace. :(

      Not all launch titles suck. But I'll grant you that most suck so badly that they drag the one or two good ones down with them.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    22. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Many of these devices are patented and manufactured by Sony themselves and nobody outside of Sony knows exactly how much it costs Sony to manufacture said device. Microsoft on the other hand mainly assembles their systems based on parts that they have to buy.

      This is not the case. While it was true that Xbox1 used some "off-the-shelf" components and other bespoke parts owned by third parties (most significantly the graphics subsystem), all of the major components of the X360 are owned by MS. There is no significant difference between any of the console players in this respect any more.

    23. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Your rebuttal reeks of as much optimism as the original poster's did of pessimism.

      Fair enough.

      There are numerous, deep flaws with the PS3 and with Sony's strategy over the last year. No amount of rationalization changes that.

      You say that like this is irrefutable; fact is, we just don't know yet. I don't believe I am rationalizing - currently I have no dog in this fight, so to speak.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    24. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Because poor dev environments caused the downfall of several historic game consoles. See: Sega Saturn.

      You make a fine case, but there seems to be a gigantic hole in your argument... shaped like a PS2. Everybody said exactly the same things about how hard it was to develop for, and we all know how that turned out.

      So while I agree that this can be an issue, from the consumer's point of view I really don't see people wondering about Insomnia's toolchain while standing there considering a console. Frankly, the colour of the unit has a bigger impact.

      And about your point about the 'top ten xmas gifts': The kids polled are probably very young. While this is one of the targets of the Wii, I can definitely see how the PS3 came on the list, and the DS as well - without the Wii. You have to look at where the youngin's are getting their information, and keep in fact that they're more impressionable by the media than your typical teenage/adult gamer. They hear 'blazingly fast' and 'not much faster than the gamecube' and they go apeshit.

      Umm... didn't you just make my argument for me? :)

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    25. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, that and the fact that nobody gives a flip about HD movies anyway. With the video tape->DVD transition, the biggest draw for normal people (i.e., not audiophiles) was simply not having to rewind the stupid thing, not the better A/V quality. Blu-ray has no similar tangible advantage, so people don't care.

      I disagree, but only in terms of speed-of-adoption. I think it is a better analogy to use Surround Sound. That was never really a 'must have' feature for many people, but 'sure is nice' for a lot, and it eventually creeped its way into much lower-end setups than when it appeared. Saying no one gives a flip is not accurate, the HD adoption curve is steepening, not flattening.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    26. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      No flaws in Sony's strategy. Sony consoles sold more than any other brand this year. Sony games sold more than any other console line too. PS2 is where its at. If some knucklehead out there wants to buy a PS3 now, well there's a large price to pay for that. Sony doesn't care than I'm going to wait it out and keep buying PS2 games and consider a PS3 later doen the road. Why would they care?

      Because they must accumulate a userbase quickly during the early life of the console since that's the numbers publishers will base their game development on. As long as the 360 has more units sold than the PS3 publishers will naturally prefer the 360 as there's more money to be made there (the Wii doesn't figure into this much since it'll most likely have a separate game development pipeline which prevents games from being easily shifted between the Wii and 360/PS3). For the publisher it doesn't matter what it costs Sony to make a unit or what the user pays for it, they can only sell one copy per unit anyway and most likely won't sell to more than a fraction of the userbase.

      But to buy a Wii? Why? It's not innovative, it's not a new platform, it's a gamecube and a powerglove ripoff. Is the Wii really better than the venerable Playstation 2?

      Since you can't compare a new console that's only available in one region yet with a console that had 6 years or so to accumulate games you'd have to go by comparing the hardware itself. In that case, yes, the Wii is better. The PS2 is really shoddy hardware wise, the games are the selling point and those cannot be compared with a next gen console's games yet (because those next gen consoles still have the first gen of games coming out).

      100 million systems buys a lot more games for middle/lower class folks than a few million 360's and wii's will.

      It'll go down, the PS2 is outdated now and publishers are scaling down support for it. No matter how much it sold it'll have lost the majority of its support one year into the next generation.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    27. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Nintendo made the Playstation with its shoddy business policy. The Playstion (original one) would not have existed if Nintendo had followed through with Sony's SNES-CD program.

      The PS would have existed, it'd just be sold under the SNES CD label. Sony wanted to get all the license fees game developers paid to the console manufacturer (essentially turning it into their console) which is what led to the split. The N64 still made Nintendo a lot of money, had they gone with the SNES CD they'd have had no console to make money from, they'd have ben pushed into a third party developer role.

      Never mind that all CD addons and systems failed badly at the time so I don't think it's fair to blame them for not having confidence in the format.

      These games came to Sony because they were running from nintendo's cutthroat policies. nintendo treats its customers great, but it plays hardball with busines partners and that's the truly astonishing business policy flaw if you're keen on scrutinizing companies that make half a billion in their worst quarter of deep investment.

      It's funny how that changed, now Sony is the one annoying developers to no end by forcing everyone to comply with their vision of the perfect console library and uses their power to deny approval of PS2 games to pressure publishers into all kinds of deals while Nintendo learned its lesson the hard way and heavily cut back on the restrictions (though some publishers are still annoyed that Nintendo will reject a game that's TOO bug prone, considering what does get approved I don't want to know how bad those were). SNK went from Sony to Nintendo because Sony's policies were interfering with their games (namely SCEA forcing them to bundle the games together because 2d games are inferior to 3d in their eyes and the HD requirement having a big impact on the development of 2d games).

      We'll see of course. PS3 is really just a delivery for bluray, clearly uneeded, but probably a big seller once HD takes off.

      I'm not sure Blu-Ray will start being a big seller before standalone Blu-Ray players cost much less than a PS3 and of course BRD prices drop to the same or a lower level as DVDs.

      It's clearly more sophisticated of a strategy than, say, motion sensing or online experience (both are easily replicated).

      No, that's not easy. The online experience of XBox Live cannot be recreated without a central authority dictating the standards (since the big feature is uniformity and all games supporting its features) and new kinds of controllers will not get widespread use if the console doesn't ship with them. Sony cannot sit back and hope third party developers make those because then they'll only have several incompatible implementations that only work for one or two games each and get bought by practically nobody. And I'm not sure either would rival their original implementations without the firmware supporting them.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    28. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      From what it sounds like I'd guess it's the faster disc drive streaming data faster than the PS2 software expects. No idea why they didn't do the same thing they did with the PS1 emulation on the PS2 and add a speed toggle.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    29. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1
      Launch titles suck. Always. It's a fact of life.
      Yup. I mean, how bad was Halo? It really was worthless, wasn't it?
    30. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Both of which are most likely fixable through firmware upgrades. Especially the compatibility which is supposed to be fixed in short order."

      Look, I agree that these aren't really worth complaining about compared to the similar problems we saw with the PS2, but I simply won't abide by this "Ship now, patch later" mentality. If Sony is going to wait until later to fix these problems, then they will also wait until later until they see my six hundred freakin' dollars. I'm not looking to make a "deposit" or an "investment," I want to buy a console.

      Granted, I never saw myself buying a PS3 before 2008, but even if Final Fantasy XIII was a launch title, after seeing what happened with the first releases of the PS and then the PS2 I wouldn't be interested in getting one of these first-generation PS3s.

      "These games are not representative of the system."

      Again, I'm not looking to make a deposit or an investment. If the games for the system suck now then I won't be buying the system now.

    31. Re:Other PS3 problems of note by theArtificial · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say the original XBOX owners were shafted. The PS1 came out in 1996 (in NA) and the PS2 came out in Jan of 2000 (NA). The XBOX came out in 2001 and the xbox 360 came out in 2005. nearly four years to the day. The whole backwards compatibility thing isn't the best however how many people buy original titles and use those on the new system? If that is such a big issue can't the old system be used to play the old systems games?

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
  4. Bet They're feeling Blue by gt_mattex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I'm correct the original PS3 was set to be built without the BluRay.

    I'm willing to bet that is the root their delays.

    At some point some marketing exec sat down at a global strategy meeting and predicted that to make BluRay work they would need to inject using their most popular gadget.

    Won't it suck for that exec if it turns out BluRay killed the PlayStation...or at least crippled it regardless of majority share of the market.

    --
    "No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture." - Learned Hand
    1. Re:Bet They're feeling Blue by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
      Won't it suck for that exec if it turns out BluRay killed the PlayStation...or at least crippled it regardless of majority share of the market.

      I think you mean "Wouldn't it be Apropriate if it turns out that Blu-Ray Killed the PlayStation?"

      and Yes it would.

      --
      OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    2. Re:Bet They're feeling Blue by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      Without Blu-Ray, PS3 would still cost about $600, only Sony wouldn't loose the rumored $300 a system they sell.

      Though, they probably would have more stock, which would have helped their cause.

      Cheers,
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    3. Re:Bet They're feeling Blue by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Or they would still lose $300, but sell at a more competitive price point. :)

    4. Re:Bet They're feeling Blue by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 1

      You also for forgot Sony could have built more consoles, without a Blu-Ray drive.

    5. Re:Bet They're feeling Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't it suck for that exec if it turns out BluRay killed the PlayStation...or at least crippled it regardless of majority share of the market.

      I wish you were right, but seeing firsthand the crazy world of executive thinking...sometimes a guy gets a job just because a)he has the balls to think he can do it right and b)sometime in the past someone trusted him with their balls to do it right.

      It's kinda like NFL quarterbacks, you know how they some guys just seem to keep getting the starting job no matter how much they lose/fail?

      Methinks Sony is currently full of these fucksticks. I'm no fanboi, but 360 FTW.

    6. Re:Bet They're feeling Blue by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Nah, Fozzyuw already made that point. Didn't want to be redundant.

    7. Re:Bet They're feeling Blue by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      That is true. =)

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
  5. Loosing exclusive titles hurts by jfclavette · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not usually a Sony doomsday prophet, but if something can kill the PS3, it's this. They need their RPGs. They need Koei and Squeenix. If those juggernauts start to slip away, then Sony is in big, big trouble. Most switches will lean in the 360 direction because of comparable specs and input mechanisms. If the exodus reaches some sort of critical mass, where companies don't believe that the PS3 will sell anymore, that whole situation might end very badly for Sony, and very well for MS and, to a lesser extent, Nintendo.

    1. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by Possibly+Malignant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree entirely. Pressure from a few of Sony's powerhouse studios already resulted in the Japanese price drop. Konami & "Squeenix" felt the high price point would result in a smaller installed base, resulting in lower sales for their titles. If studios are concerned that titles like Metal Gear and Final Fantasy won't sell, there could be trouble ahead for Sony.

    2. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      Koei doesn't make RPGs to my knowledge. It's certainly not what they're known for, at any rate.

      Anyway, the two exclusives that Sony lost are both new franchises. If Sony loses Dynasty/Samurai Warriors (or FF13 and DQ9 on the Squenix side), then there will be reason for worry. (Yeah, I know the Warriors games have almost always come out on the XBox, but the PS2 versions generally come out earlier and with expansions.)

      Rob

    3. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      More to the point, third parties porting their games to other platforms, to me, suggests lack of confidence in the PS3 marketplace, and *that* is scary. After all, it's one thing for a dope like me to predict doom for Sony. It's another, entirely, if their third-party developers lose confidence in them.

    4. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      I believe Squeenix has made some vague references to them not being Sony/PS3 exclusive this time around. They've confirmed that Final Fantasy XIII will be PS3 exclusive, but they apparently have some plans for some sort of Final Fantasy game, among others, for the 360.

      As it stands, Sony has already lost some heavy hitters in the form of Rockstar (GTA) and Konami as both have announced their intention to release formerly PS3 exclusive titles on the 360 simultaneously.

      With more and more titles going cross platform, featuring nearly identical graphics, features and gameplay, exclusive titles are going to be more important than ever. I hope Sony realizes that, and stops assuming that people will buy a Playstation based on name alone.

    5. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by Perseid · · Score: 1

      This is not a worry. Most of the big-name RPGs are Japanese and with the sales of the 360 in Japan I don't think Sony has much to worry about there.

    6. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by Babbster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair, it's not a really question of "will" MGS and Final Fantasy sell - they'll sell huge, in that if there were 2 million PS3s owned by gamers, each of those games could still sell a million units. It's more a question of how huge the sales will be. Think of it this way: If Take 2/Rockstar had skipped the Xbox entirely in terms of GTA games, they still would have sold millions of units and made a ton of money. By releasing on the Xbox, they probably got at least a million more sales (virtually every used Xbox I see on Craig's List comes with at least a copy of San Andreas) for the relatively small cost of porting the game.

      The problem for Sony is that there seems to be a perception that they need their exclusives due to the Microsoft head start and the high price of their hardware. Because they didn't lock up franchises like GTA or the "hot" new property, Assassin's Creed (for example), Microsoft can make what is probably a cheaper deal to make them multiplatform and gamers won't have those extra incentives to buy the PS3 (don't get me wrong, there are other incentives - I'm only a "hater" in terms of price).

      The bottom line is that PS2 ended up with many (many, many) exclusives over time thanks to their ridiculous market share advantage. For at least the next year, if not a couple years, they're not going to have that advantage (certainly not in the US, probably not in Europe, maybe not in Japan depending on the Wii's penetration), so PS3 exclusives will have to come either from the preference of a particular developer (MGS's boss seems to be enamored of Sony, for example) or specific deals (like cheaper licensing fees) between the developer and Sony. Otherwise, it makes more sense to at least go multiplatform based purely on the hardware numbers.

      As a gamer, I hate exclusives because they unnecessarily (given the relatively low cost to port games as opposed to starting from scratch) limit my options. They are necessary, though, for companies trying to differentiate themselves from the competition and sell more hardware.

    7. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by Shados · · Score: 1

      I don't remember the original playstation being all so hot (even in japan) when FFVII came out. Square Enix will jump ship as soon as they get a better offer on a system they think could work with their support. With FF13 so far away, it still just reminds me of the N64 days. There was a Final Fantasy scheduled for it, promised as exclusive blah blah blah. I still even have the screenshots of the demo (a bit like how we have the FF13 trailer now), and it looked damn good.

      Then we turned around and surprise surprise, FF7 was on a console very few people had ever heard of, that was owned by a company which was less pushy/pissy (in those days, Nintendo was the one making all the demands from the developers, a bit like Sony did during the PS2 age).

      Now i'll admit its a bit more confusing, since MS is an american company, as opposed to sony. So would SE go there? Don't know. Maybe the Wii (which would be possible: FF7 looked like garbage compared to the previews of the N64 FF, so its not beyond them to switch to a console thats less graphicaly powerful). Maybe they'll just develop FFs on all consoles (most likely scenario in my opinion, since it already started).

      Lots of maybes, since its all so far away... but don't be surprised if FF13 -never- comes out on the PS3, announced or not.

    8. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by c_forq · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking that the PS3 is looking a lot like the N64. When making the N64 Nintendo was really arrogant and high off of the success of the Super Nintendo. If you look at the interviews leading up to the Gamecube Nintendo was basically saying "Yeah, we really screwed the pooch on the N64 - this system should correct all of our mistakes" and switched to optical disks, put better sound processing in, and made the system easier to develop for. I don't think the PS3 will cause Sony to tank (or cause them to sell/close/separate their games division) or anything like that, but I do think they will be knocked out of their number one spot, like Nintendo was.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    9. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "With more and more titles going cross platform, featuring nearly identical graphics, features and game play, exclusive titles are going to be more important than ever."
      You forgot to add "for Sony".
      If all the games are identical and available for the PS3 and the 360 then the 360 will win. It is a lot cheaper then the PS3 after all.
      Sony must have games that people are willing to pay a $200 more for the console and possible for go the exclusives on the 360 for.
      Then you have to problem of a delayed launch in Europe. It will be interesting to see if Microsoft can get enough RPG developers to develop for the 360. Of course if they get Starcraft and Lineage on the 360 they will wrap up the Korean market.
      Does anyone know what the console market in Korea is like? Just wondering where they are in the grand scheme of things.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      For at least the next year, if not a couple years, they're not going to have that advantage (certainly not in the US, probably not in Europe, maybe not in Japan depending on the Wii's penetration)

      Whether or not the Wii has a huge penetration doesn't matter, since the Wii and the PS3 are such different consoles, and aim at different markets. There will be PS3 exclusives and there will be Wii exclusives, and I expect very few PS3 games ported to the Wii and vice-versa. I own a Wii, and I don't think I'd be interested in a game that would be simply ported from the PS3, since it wouldn't have any of the "Wii spirit" or couldn't really use the Wiimote in a decent way. Plus, they'd have to cut down on a lot of features / eye-candy since the Wii's hardware can't output the same power as the PS3.

      Games ported from the PS3 to the Wii won't use the input device correctly and will be feature-poor. Games ported from the Wii to the PS3 won't use half of the powerful hardware people paid $600 for.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    11. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Of course if they get Starcraft and Lineage on the 360 they will wrap up the Korean market.

      Starcraft?! Isn't that game something like 10 years old? Unless you're talking about a Starcraft 2, I don't understand why it would have anything to do with the 360.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    12. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by iainl · · Score: 1

      Blade Storm is a new Dynasty Warriors style game, and so likely to appeal to the Japanese, but Fatal Inertia is the latest attempt to do a WipEout clone. Those tend to mainly appeal to the European (and to a lesser extent US) market, where there are a whole bunch of 360s. So I can understand the multiplatform decision, and I don't think it'll gain Microsoft much foothold in Japan either.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    13. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      It was more of a joke. Starcraft has been extremely popular in Korea for years.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    14. Re:Loosing exclusive titles hurts by Babbster · · Score: 1

      That's a good point, to a point. While it's true that the PS3 and Wii could end up segmenting the market, the question remains whether the PS3 market is big enough considering its high price (launch adopters hardly count in the long run, especially with the small number of PS3s that will be available between now and spring). In other words, while developers and customers may not be as interested in multiplatforming between the PS3 and Wii with their radically different capabilities, if the Wii has a much larger market share than the PS3 then Japanese developers - especially those doing games intended solely for the Japanese market - could simply devote more (or all) of their resources to developing for the Wii. This applies less outside of Japan since the 360 already has a pretty solid base (especially considering the fully functional unit is still $100 more expensive than consoles of previous generations) and will likely attract some developer support regardless. That said, even outside Japan, if the Wii becomes a runaway success then the 360 could suffer for it as well.

  6. So in other words your verdit is... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Sony is dying.

    Same troll, new generation.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:So in other words your verdit is... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      It's not a troll when it's true. At least about the gaming division.

      Well, unless Sony can figure out where to find a few million spare consoles before Xmas.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:So in other words your verdit is... by spxero · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the rest of console buyers, but I am personally waiting until a game or feature compels me to buy one of these next gen consoles. I currently have an PS2, and I would say that overall it has outperformed and outlasted xbox's of the same era. That is one of the reasons that I haven't bought an xbox yet. And that's one reason that Sony shouldn't be scared. They brought the ps3 out and an outrageous price, and will see a lot more sales pick up when the price drops to sub-$400. And as many other /.er's will note, Sony traditionally loses money on the console and more than makes up for it in the games department. I would say that most of the console sales are going to come out after Christmas (due to both shortages and people holding out)

    3. Re:So in other words your verdit is... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The PS2 has performed very well for me, too but the PS3 does so many things wrong that I won't risk buying it since at the current rate it looks like the games are going to end up on the 360 next gen (with the Wii having a disjunct set of games though I hae no idea which one will have more in the end). First one I'm willing to risk is the Wii and I'll try to get one on launch day.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  7. Xbox? by fatty+ding+dong · · Score: 4, Funny
    They did better than Microsoft last week in Japan, with around 81,000 PS3s, 19,000 PSPs, and 16,000 PS2s sold to a mere 4,000 Xbox 360s and ... 4 Xboxes.

    At this stage in the game, who is buying a NEW Xbox? You couldn't find a used one or hit up Ebay? I need to find one of these 4 people. I have a nice 486 with a Turbo button that they might find appealing.

    --
    -Now I may be an idiot, but there is one thing I am not sir, and that, sir, is an idiot.
    1. Re:Xbox? by karnal · · Score: 1

      At my stage in the game I would actually consider buying an Xbox brand new.

      Why?

      They're cheap! Well, at least cheaper than the new generation of consoles. To me that's a lot. In addition, the games (most of which I've not played) I could pay 20$ or less for! That's a win-win for me, especially for a brand new console w/warranty.

      I have a PS2 I've probably played 20 or 30 games total on. And now, I can find games for 20$ or less that I salivated over about 2 years ago (I just bought GT4 and am hooked on that for now....)

      I'm cheap in my gaming nowadays. Being 30+ I don't see dropping the money for a new PS3 as worthwhile as I probably used to.

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:Xbox? by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      They got them to mod and put thousands of classic games on, of course.

    3. Re:Xbox? by Dobeln · · Score: 1

      I recently (a month or so) bought a spanking new XBOX. Why? Because it's dirt cheap new, and because XBOX Media Center on a chipped XBOX is just one of the best TV media center solutions around - and certainly the cheapest.

    4. Re:Xbox? by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At this stage in the game, who is buying a NEW Xbox? You couldn't find a used one or hit up Ebay? I need to find one of these 4 people. I have a nice 486 with a Turbo button that they might find appealing.

      Dude, I've seen brand new, unopened consoles from the 80s in Japan. We're talking Famicom and PC Engine (aka NES and TurboGrafx-16). There are several shops in Akihabara that sell both the systems and plenty of games, not all used.

      In comparison, an Xbox isn't that surprising of a purchase. It's still not a bad base for making an HTPC once you mod it, and until the 360 is cracked, there's not many better choices on the market at its price range. I can definitely see 4 in the whole of Japan deciding to get one new instead of used.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    5. Re:Xbox? by danlock4 · · Score: 1
      At this stage in the game, who is buying a NEW Xbox? You couldn't find a used one or hit up Ebay? I need to find one of these 4 people. I have a nice 486 with a Turbo button that they might find appealing.
      Is it a NEW 486 with a Turbo button? ;-) Otherwise, your comparison isn't fair...
      --
      To .sig or not to .sig, that is the question.
    6. Re:Xbox? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I'm cheap too and just got a PS2 this past spring, but you wouldn't see me buying an XBox at this point. My impression is the PS2 has a lot more momentum than the XBox, and that the PS2 will continue to have new games released whereas the XBox will have few, if any. I suppose you could just buy both, but for me it's not worth the clutter.

    7. Re:Xbox? by Kumiorava · · Score: 1

      Those Xboxes are most likely bought by some sorry developer who just hired 4 new people in their testing squad to test some latest import of some random game.

    8. Re:Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guys in our office just bought 7 xboxen today - more than all of Japan :-)
      It was because it was less than 50 pounds ($100 in US roubles), i.e. the price of a single Xbox 360 game, for the hardware including four good games.

  8. This lack of shortages does not matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    At the end of all this, its just Sony's to lose. They are the reigning KING of consoles. Anyone can spew the facts of Xbox this or Nintendo that, but at the end Sony controls 65%+ of the console gaming pie.

    'High DEMAND' thats key word buzz of the report. what the consumers were thinking about for PS3. Chances are a good portion of people who wanted a PS3 and didn't get one will NOT switch over to another system. Its not like they are thinking 'Well I guess I'll get an Xbox 360 since I can't get a PS3' Thats just wrong consumer mentality to assume.

    This lack of shortages does not matter. If Sony pushes out PS3 next year this will be a thing of the past. Sure they may lose market share to Nintendo and MS, but unless there is massive failure on their PS3 I don't see anyone knocking them off their throne too soon.

    spoken like a true fanboy! shortage=high demand think about it. and the fact that blue-ray is being used is the main reason why there is shortage there expensive and more diffcult to make. sony even had to push back thier home blue-ray players becuase they had the same problems. and ten decades? a decade is ten years? so 100 years ago sony was making gaming consoles. damn your smart. besides the ps3 is computer that runs linix yeah... it's like that.

    1. Re:This lack of shortages does not matter. by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      At the end of all this, its just Sony's to lose. They are the reigning KING of consoles. Anyone can spew the facts of Xbox this or Nintendo that, but at the end Sony controls 65%+ of the console gaming pie.

      Well, if you include handhelds they control less than 50% of the hardware market; when it comes to software Nintendo sells about 4 times as much software as Sony does.

      This lack of shortages does not matter. If Sony pushes out PS3 next year this will be a thing of the past. Sure they may lose market share to Nintendo and MS, but unless there is massive failure on their PS3 I don't see anyone knocking them off their throne too soon.

      I don't think you understand what time of year this is ...

      http://www.vgcharts.org/usaconscomps.php?name1=PS2 &name2=&type=0
      http://www.vgcharts.org/usaconscomps.php?name1=GC& name2=&type=0
      http://www.vgcharts.org/usaconscomps.php?name1=XB& name2=&type=0

      You see those amazingly large spikes that represent about half of all system sales that are exactly 12 months apart? Yes, that represents the 4th quarter of every year where (most) major purchases are made. Sony's shortage at this time of year means that they're sacrificing a ton of sales thereby reducing their market share which will reduce the number of exclusives (which will further reduce market share). Add to that the delay in Europe and there is no chance that Sony's sales will look nearly as good as either Nintendo's or Microsoft's.

      spoken like a true fanboy! shortage=high demand think about it.

      No, Shortage means that Supply Demand!

      When you have no shortage and can sell 4 Million units you have high demand, when only 10,000 people want something and you supply 1,000 units you still have a shortage regardless of having a small demand.

    2. Re:This lack of shortages does not matter. by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      I disagree entirely. Consumers are willing to change on a dime. As recent history has shown, delays in Windows Vista have driven huge increases in people switching to Mac or Linux.

      oh wait...

    3. Re:This lack of shortages does not matter. by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      , delays in Windows Vista have driven huge increases in people switching to Mac or Linux.

      Worst analogy ever.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    4. Re:This lack of shortages does not matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:This lack of shortages does not matter. by dootbran · · Score: 1

      I don't think the sarcasm was the problem... I think it was the bad analogy. Purchasing decisions for Windows and OS X are not like those for PS3 and Xbox360,

      1. Apple actually has a product that is expected to ship around the same time as Vista, so anyone sitting on the fence may be MORE likely to choose Vista since Microsoft is handing out vouchers if you purchase now. If you buy a new Mac its going to run you $130 in February for the new OS.
      2. Most customers don't buy the PC for the OS they buy a PC, the OS doesn't even enter the picture. When shopping for the PC most of them don't compare Windows to Mac they compare Dells and HPs.
      3. On the other hand quite a few gamers do make an active decision in which console they purchase, or at least narrow it down via "I don't like the X".

      It is hard to really say if the shortage actually hurts Sony but I am pretty sure that it doesn't help them.

    6. Re:This lack of shortages does not matter. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      You see those amazingly large spikes that represent about half of all system sales that are exactly 12 months apart? Yes, that represents the 4th quarter of every year where (most) major purchases are made.

      Have you noticed that the biggest spikes occur during the second year after the console launches? I agree that Sony will lose a huge chunk of business by not having enough units for this Christmas, but that doesn't mean the difference couldn't be made up during Christmas 2007 or 2008. (I hope not, though -- Sony needs to be punished for its anti-customer, pro-DRM attitude.)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:This lack of shortages does not matter. by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Purchasing decisions for Windows and OS X are not like those for PS3 and Xbox360,

      Exactly. I didn't have your points in mind though, though they play a role too. The main thing I think is that there is a lot of inertia when switching OSes because people have invested hours upon hours of learning them and the applications they use on top. Often their whole business processes are entangled with the OS and the apps. Retooling is not considered fun ("oh I get to learn a new OS") but a chore, and is costly.

      All those points are totally not true for consoles and their apps (games). People might have invested hours to learn games, but the skills transfer rather well between MS-exclusives and Sony-exclusives, except if you absolutely need to play a sequel to one or the other. Learning a new game is considered fun and one of the points of playing in the first place, and whether you do that on PS3 or 360 does not matter. Nothing depends on your choice, like your business.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    8. Re:This lack of shortages does not matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main thing I think is that there is a lot of inertia when switching OSes because people have invested hours upon hours of learning them and the applications they use on top.

      So, brand inertia has nothing to do with it? Major apps like Office run on PC and Mac, web browsers are all the same, and yet I don't think you could possibly say people are at all reasonable when it comes to deciding Mac-vs-PC or Linux-vs-anything. You can also toss in ATI-vs-NVidia, or Intel-vs-AMD. Ever notice the the "best" at any given time might not lead in sales? Many reasons for this are emotional, and with little basis in fact, just like with consoles. In fact this is pretty common to all brand loyalties, going back to the ancient Ford-vs-Chevy and so on. But it's ok, I'm sure you feel Mac, PC, and Linux users are completely objective in their choices, unlike how people get worked up about console wars! Totally different.

      Often their whole business processes are entangled with the OS and the apps.

      What has that got to do with "consumers"? Do most people run multi-employee businesses from their home computer now? I think not.

      People might have invested hours to learn games, but the skills transfer rather well between MS-exclusives and Sony-exclusives, except if you absolutely need to play a sequel to one or the other.

      How many completely new AAA games have come out in the past five years? How many are sequels of some kind? There are more versions of Final Fantasy than Office or Photoshop. Exclusives are a big deal to app/game fans.

  9. Re:So in other words your verdict is... by Control+Group · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't get ahead of yourself; Netcraft hasn't confirmed it.

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  10. Useful numbers from Japan by confu2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.the-magicbox.com/topten.htm

    For 2006 through the end of October, 84,949 360s sold in Japan. 81,639 PS3s sold at launch.

    From what I can find, there were 100K 360s sold in Japan in 2005.

    So it looks like somewhere around 190K 360s vs 82K PS3s in Japan currently with Microsoft's 1 year head start.

    Value Japanese sales in the greater scheme of things as you please.

  11. Oh, good by dryriver · · Score: 2, Funny

    "PS3 Missed Ship Targets" the convoy must have made it safely across the channel then.

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
  12. NY Times.. yea right by Mdentari · · Score: 0

    Who the heck cares what the NY Times says. If your going to the Times to get a console review then there is no hope for you.

    --
    Morality, filters both ways.
    1. Re:NY Times.. yea right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it possible to mod a comment with a score of 0 overrated?

    2. Re:NY Times.. yea right by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      In English?

    3. Re:NY Times.. yea right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, and people say the American public school system is failing our children. Just...wow.

    4. Re:NY Times.. yea right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were this a troll, it would be sheer beauty. As it is, I'm saving it - for while it may not be a troll today, tomorrow...

      muahahahaha!

    5. Re:NY Times.. yea right by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Sony been leading for what 10 decades now

      That would be Nintendo. Otherwise ... yeah, worst post ever.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    6. Re:NY Times.. yea right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the way the MSfanboys critisize the ps3 with such extrem,it reminds me of the presidential election, you remember about all the critisizism of George Bush and farhenheit 911 and all the trash about him?Who won the election :BUSH.The 360 owners are so afraid of the ps3 that they read all the news about this console and analyze them with such precision to find a way to bash the ps3.HAHAHAHAH,if you dont care about the ps3 why you read all the news about the ps3?hahaha,youre are so jealous because you know how the ps3 will rule like it did with the ps2;the 100000000 ps2 owners are waiting for the ps3 and they will get it.

  13. Sony loses executives??? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    PS3 Missed Ship Targets, Loses Executives

    Am I hte only one that read it that way the first time.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Sony loses executives??? by Daemonstar · · Score: 1

      Lol, I read it that way, too, on the main page (not to mention my boss walked in at the same time). :)

      --
      I don't reply to Anonymous posts; if you have something to say to me, identify yourself or I won't reply.
    2. Re:Sony loses executives??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

  14. MicroWho? by donut1005 · · Score: 1
    They did better than Microsoft last week in Japan
    that is never news
    --
    3A 4E 22 05 C1 83 0B 7A
    It's random, but my posting it here is probably considered illegal to someone.
    1. Re:MicroWho? by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 1

      That's a given, but I'm wondering how the 360 did in North America. Also, it will be very interesting to see the sale figures for next week given the fact that the PS3 and Wii (I got mine at launch Wiii!) are in short supply.

  15. 360 numbers in Japan are lower b/c of Blue Dragon by jchenx · · Score: 4, Insightful
    First of all, I totally agree that the numbers from Japan are useless, in comparing PS3 to 360 (as many sites are reporting). Of course the PS3 is going to do well in it's first week! That said, I did want to point out one thing ...

    Then again Microsoft's numbers are picking up in preperation for Blue Dragon, only a couple monthes ago they were barely breaking 1K units. However now it's much more.
    Actually, I'd say it's quite the opposite. I would fully expect 360 sales numbers in Japan to be lower than usual because of Blue Dragon. It makes sense and here's why.

    We know that there's surprisingly a lot of interest in the Blue Dragon 360 bundle, set to release in December. It also recently took over the #3 spot on Famitsu's list of most anticipated titles. So, if you know there's a bundle coming out in December, why on earth would you buy a 360 now? It's akin to buying a system when you know a price drop is going to happen in a few weeks.

    The numbers will be most interesting a week after the game and bundle launches. (The week it actually ships will see an artificial bump of 360 sales, similar to the PS3 one. I fully expect, "wowzers, 360>PS3 lolololezr" articles then as well) Then we can start tracking trends to see if MS will actually have a chance in Japan, or if it's going to be more of the same.

    --
    -- jchenx
  16. Well by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A small number maybe, but Sony are also undoubtedly losing out on the import markets. After they recently shut down Lik-Sang.com and got importing PS3's to the UK and a number of other countries banned by law they will have surely shut out a sector of the market of those who are the most hardcore gamers and cannot wait for their consoles (with the European and Australasia launch coming in March 2007 due to lack of Blu-Ray components). It's a shame they had to go to these lengths, which would be understandable if they had have had a global launch date, but leaving some countries without the console for a number of months isn't the best idea, and by blocking imports to those countries they are only loosing more sales and aggravating consumers.

    I have a feeling that Sony will need to start giving incentives or at least making it a desirable environment for developers in order to create some games that will become a MUST for the console buyers (like Halo for Xbox, Gears of War/Halo 3 for Xbox360, Mario for N64 etc) if they want to really compete with the low priced Wii and the 360 which is flaunting it's powerful internet features now.

    1. Re:Well by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      It's a shame they had to go to these lengths, which would be understandable if they had have had a global launch date...

      No. Sony has become an asshole and a bully; not having a global launch date is no excuse for that behavior.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "they are only loosing more sales and aggravating consumers."

      First, losing. Second, how can they lose sales? They're sold out. They will stay sold out until the European launch (when importing becomes largely pointless), quite possibly even beyond that.

  17. Re:360 numbers in Japan are lower b/c of Blue Drag by Keeper · · Score: 1

    The are a fixed number of bundles. Apparently they're all reserved/preordered, so there isn't anything to "wait" for.

  18. Re:Bad analogy time by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

    That's a terrible analogy. Perhaps you'd like to come up with a bad car an logy next.

    "You see it's like this: If Honda designed a car with seven engines..."

  19. Funny thing... by dlc3007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The interesting thing is that if all the numbers are true (or even close), that means that over 10% of all PS3s purchased were resold on eBay -- maybe higher. Don't know why, but that's funny to me.

    1. Re:Funny thing... by Shados · · Score: 1

      I remember reading in a very non-scientific report (which probably didn't mean much, but this is slashdot, who cares) something as high as 25%. Though it almost make enough sense for me to beleive it.

      In any case, I doubt game developers will cry over it. They gave Nintendo the finger a decade ago because Nintendo was trying to control them. Sony during the PS2 days did the same, so they're probably all -praying- for Sony to fail so they can jump ship for the next console maker who'll give them everything they want...

    2. Re:Funny thing... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      I heard a completely unsubstantiated number of 100,000 PS3s sold on eBay. If so, that's more like 50%.. Not surprising really, considering lineup interviews with prospective buyers.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  20. Nothing Stops the DS.... by trdrstv · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Sony launches a console, Microsoft has a console that's been out for a year. Why do we expect Microsoft's console to sell as many?

    Granted it bucks the trend, but the DS Lite has been selling over 100,000 units per week in Japan since Nintendo has been able to make over 100,000 systems per week for Japan.

  21. Re:360 numbers in Japan are lower b/c of Blue Drag by jchenx · · Score: 1

    Last I heard, it was the limited edition sets that were all sold-out. If you're telling me that all 100,000 bundles have been reserved, then that's just frickin amazing. And you'd be right, there wouldn't be anything to "wait" for.

    Although, I suppose that if Blue Dragon is the only reason why you want a 360, it would make sense to just wait until it launches and pick the system up with the game (even if you can't get the bundle), to save multiple trips to the store. There'd be no worry about limited quantities of the 360, since there's been little demand for the systems.

    --
    -- jchenx
  22. Re:Bad analogy time by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

    "You see it's like this: If Honda designed a car with seven engines..."

    Damn, I might just have to buy a Honda!

  23. Re: Not all Launch titles suck... by trdrstv · · Score: 1
    Launch titles suck. Always. It's a fact of life.

    As a general rule 'Most' suck. Fine, but Zelda rocks, and there are other exceptions...

  24. Re:360 numbers in Japan are lower b/c of Blue Drag by Keeper · · Score: 1

    It could me I misread something, though honestly 100k units isn't a huge amount when you think about it. It is a large number relative to the number of sales they've already had in Japan, but they still sell 2-3 times that amount every month in the US alone.

    I suspect Blue Dragon isn't the only reason to purchase a 360 in Japan, though it is probably the game that will push many people over the edge to get one.

  25. Sony's Reaction by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
    Sony Computer Entertainment America couldn't be more pleased with the response we have seen from consumers since the launch of PlayStation 3 on Friday," said corporate communications boss David Karraker. "This truly demonstrates the power of the PlayStation brand and further validates our belief that consumers see real value in an entertainment system that will define the next decade of digital entertainment.

    Translation: We love it when people are shooting each other for an overpriced piece of hype. It truly demonstrates the power of PR and short supplies.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    1. Re:Sony's Reaction by HappySqurriel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One thing a shortage can do is enable a company to be delusional about the demand for the product that they're selling. I'm going to use cars as my example ...

      Suppose that this year GM produced a brand new supercharged luxury compact sedan which they sold for $50,000 that was based on the Cobalt; and suppose that GM only produced 25,000 of these cars that sold out (almost) instantly. A marketing drone in GM suddenly believes that there is a massive market for this car and decides that it is important to increase production to 1,000,000 for the next model year; in that model year the company sells 125,000 before they begin (drastically) reducing the price in order to move the excess inventory.

      125,000 units would have been a respectable number of cars to sell in a model year but being that 875,000 went unsold it would be remembered as a failure (and the model would be discontinued).

      Now, I'm not saying that this will happen to Sony, but 6 months down the line (when the supply of units meets the demand for the units) Sony could be thinking that they have the next big product on their hands where they really had a dud ...

  26. News at 11 for /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And on the second week, microsoft sold an infinite more xbox360...

  27. Ha Ha by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
    With such low launch stock, Sony is losing sales during a period when the hype around the console at its highest. Nintendo on the other hand plan to ship four million Wii consoles this year, giving them a three million lead over the PS3 by the year end.

    Day 2 and Sony is in 3rd place. I believe I called this one months ago.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    1. Re:Ha Ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I believe I called this one months ago."

      Yeah - You are real sharp with your ability to read press releases, and see that Sony was going to ship less units than Nintendo this year.

      While patting your self on the back for this, why not give a slap for remembering how to breath and urinate today?

      Idiot

  28. Gears of Wars for PS3 by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    Searching for a Playstation 3 tech demo on YouTube I found a Gears of Wars like preview of Unreal, on PS3! Today it is marketed as a Microsoft supported game. Does anyone know why that PS3 version has been abandoned? Did Microsoft support it with enough dollars or is this GoW only a preview of the might to come?

    1. Re:Gears of Wars for PS3 by inotocracy · · Score: 1

      Thats just Unreal 3, nothing suspicious here.

    2. Re:Gears of Wars for PS3 by Osty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Searching for a Playstation 3 tech demo on YouTube I found a Gears of Wars like preview of Unreal, on PS3! Today it is marketed as a Microsoft supported game. Does anyone know why that PS3 version has been abandoned? Did Microsoft support it with enough dollars or is this GoW only a preview of the might to come?

      As the sibling post says, that's just Unreal 3. Sure, it has a big, beefy human character but that's just Epic's style. As far as GoW on anything but Xbox 360, keep in mind that Microsoft published the game (usually Epic gets published by Atari/Infogrames/GT Interactive/whatever they're calling themselves these days) so unless Epic can shop around to another publisher (no idea what's in their development contract; they may not be able to shop around) they're not going to get GoW published on PS3 or Wii. There's still a chance it may make it to Windows, though probably as a Vista-only gamelike Halo 2.

  29. The Squeenix factor by jchenx · · Score: 1

    I wonder if there's any truth to the hypothesis that whichever console gets Square-Enix's primary franchises first (Final Fantasy and Dragon Quest), wins the market share for that generation. I believe it's always been true (maybe not with the SNES/Genesis, since that race was pretty close I believe).

    If so, Sony better be worried and lock up those franchises tightly, and not give Squeenix any wiggle room. We already know they're working on the 360 (with the old Final Fantasy XI and Project Slypheed), so it's not out of the question that some flavor of the next FF or DQ game would be released on the 360. Also, if Blue Dragon really does well, Squeenix may not want Mistwalker Studios to "own" the J-RPG genre for the 360.

    --
    -- jchenx
    1. Re:The Squeenix factor by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      You make a good point here, about Mistwalker and Squeenix. If the PS3 does poorly, worldwide, and there's questions of whether there will be a PS4, Squeenix will have to go XBox720 (or Nintendo WiiHD, or whatever). If Mistwalker Studios is already well established on the Microsoft end, Squeenix is going to have some feirce competition for the first time in a while. The only thing is that, really, RPG manufacturers really aren't in competition with each other, so much. As long as they have staggered releases, the sale of one game will not profoundly have an effect on the sale of another.

      It wouldn't surprise me, at all, if Square has been developing FF13 for the 360 in secret for a while now, in the same way that Apple developed MacOS X for Intel. RPGs are about 95% art work, and 5% coding anyway, so that's just a small added expense for a potentially HUGE safety net, not to mention the 360 is supposed to be easier to code for.

      We already saw Squeenix slip a little in this past generation, as they went GBA and now DS on a few games (including an upcoming FF12 sequel), as well as FF11 for the XBox. They would be stupid NOT to jump ship if things started looking grim for Sony. Basically, the Japanese market follows Squeenix, if they were to go Nintendo or Microsoft, you can pretty much kiss Sony's market dominance over there (and most everywhere else) goodbye.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
  30. Re:Bad analogy time by toddhunter · · Score: 1

    That is one way to look at it. The other way to look at it is the PS3 almost sold more units in japan a week than the xbox360 has sold in total. I don't think Sony is too worried at this point

  31. Seattle Times tech blog claims this too by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Not sure what the exact blog is, but I saw it on the
    Tech Tracks blog, saying that Sony had only about 125,000 to 175,000 PS3 units to sell last weekend while Nintendo sold about 425,000 to 475,000 Wii consoles at launch, with shipments of 1.5 million to 2 million units to North American stores this year.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  32. Re:Ha Ha, or Who is on Second? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Day 2 and Sony is in 3rd place. I believe I called this one months ago.

    True, but the big question is - who's on Second?

    Right now it's looking like the Wii is selling all it can ship from Nintendo, but will the larger current installed base of xBox360 added to the new Japan-style games allow it to pull a close second, or even edge out the Wii?

    Will we have a repeat of the PS2 success, where the Wii pulls way ahead leaving the xBox360 and PS3 to battle it out for a distand second and third, or will we have a neck and neck first and second place struggle, with Sony so far back they end up being a laughingstock?

    The earliest we can tell any of this will be January 15th when we get the end of year stats for post-Xmas sales worldwide. But in reality, we really need to give all three a year to get a real feel what's going on.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  33. Re:360 numbers in Japan are lower b/c of Blue Drag by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 2, Informative
    100,000 pre-orders filling up for a Japanese RPG in Japan doesn't sound that far fetched. From anecdotal experience, I've found Japanese friends to be big on bundles. They are equally big on Blue Dragon, mainly because of the creator. Hironobu Sakaguchi is bigger with the Japanese than John Carmack is with FPS fans altogether.

    Also, try not to explain away the numbers by using the idea that these people would try to save trips. The Japanese are more mobile than Americans. Going to the game store isn't going out of the way. It's just part of another trip.

    Oh, and according to Wikipedia:
    On October 19, 2006 all 10,000 Blue Dragon preorders bundled with a limited edition Xbox360 Core system were sold-out in Japan. 90,000 additional Xbox360 sold the same day.

    They want Blue Dragon badly. And they don't care what system it's for.
  34. Why? by whoop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why did Sony set a launch when they clearly can't keep up with demand? Do people want it more that they can't have it, and Joey down the block has one? Did they just want to avoid being third in released systems? Nintendo's clearly hurting now that their system was released last. But then, Xbox 360 was the same way. It wasn't in stores for what, a good six months after "launch?" At least then they were the only next-gen console around.

    Nintendo seems to be the only one with the supply to meet the demand. Stores are receiving shipments every week. They have a good lineup of games, Zelda being rated very highly by everyone. Some of the PS3 games I've read about seem to just be prettier/high-defier versions of existing fps/racers/madden. Nothing new with them but the price tag.

    And how about them developers? All the extra work in textures and such for the prettiest hi-def graphics. One article said it was in the $10+ million range to make a game. Then they only sell for $10 more than Nintendo Wii games. Companies have to sell massive numbers just to keep themselves even, which explains sticking with set genres. No chance for experimenting on new styles or anything with that huge a risk.

    By the time there are enough PS3s for stores to have some on their shelves, Nintendo will already be hitting 10 million systems. Each of those will have perhaps 3-5 store-bought games, as well as some Virtual Console games. That's a big hole they have to dig out of.

    So, why did they launch prematurely?

    1. Re:Why? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Nintendo's clearly hurting now that their system was released last.

      It was last by 2 days. That's negligible. Besides, it's already sold several times as much as the PS3 anyway (considering they both sold out, and several times many more Wiis were made...).

      So, why did they launch prematurely?

      Christmas. Not that it's going to do them any good, though, because "getting it out in time for the holidays" on paper won't cause them to magically have enough consoles to even come close to meeting the seasonal demand anyway.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Why? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "So, why did they launch prematurely?"

      Stockholders don't like delays.

  35. Re:360 numbers in Japan are lower b/c of Blue Drag by jchenx · · Score: 1
    100,000 pre-orders filling up for a Japanese RPG in Japan doesn't sound that far fetched. From anecdotal experience, I've found Japanese friends to be big on bundles. They are equally big on Blue Dragon, mainly because of the creator. Hironobu Sakaguchi is bigger with the Japanese than John Carmack is with FPS fans altogether.
    It doesn't surprise me that 100k of pre-orders have been filled for a Japanese RPG. What's shocking is that it's for one on the Xbox 360, where sales have been anemic. It seems to point to good signs for MS.

    Also, try not to explain away the numbers by using the idea that these people would try to save trips. The Japanese are more mobile than Americans. Going to the game store isn't going out of the way. It's just part of another trip.
    Good point, although I'm not sure I completely buy it. For your typical Blue Dragon fan, you can either get a 360 now and check out the other games that are on it. Or perhaps only BD interests you, so you'd rather just pick up the console then. I have no idea, nor should I pretend to know, the mind of the average Japanese video gamer.

    In any case, all the speculation will end in a few weeks anyway, once the dang thing ships and we start getting real numbers. I guess my main point is that the sales numbers in Japan now, while interesting, don't tell the whole story. I think we agree on that, at least.
    --
    -- jchenx
  36. Re:Losing exclusive titles hurts by Tsuzuki · · Score: 1

    (Yeah, I know the Warriors games have almost always come out on the XBox, but the PS2 versions generally come out earlier and with expansions.)

    If you've played the later games (SW and DW5 onwards), you can see why Koei started releasing them on the 360 rather than the XBox - when you play the PS2 version, having a lot of troops on screen really pushes it in a bad way. Enemies disappear but are still able to hit you, or the PS2 even crashes.

    Bladestorm is/was one of the PS3 games that really interested me, apart from Devil May Cry 4. It's a new franchise, but it's the Hundred Years War version of the Warriors games so it's most probably in Koei's "million seller" genre. I've actually held off buying Samurai Warriors 2 until I get a 360, and the Bladestorm news just helps that along.

  37. naught suprised.. by gamekeeper · · Score: 1

    Personaly, I am glad to see SONY eat some pride and stuff.. All the ps/3 is more Hype than hip, More show and little go. I am glad to hear of the imperfections being exploited within Sony's Armor.. It's about time that SONY get theirs, and waws humbled by its own game.. A reputation and hype are no substutite (sp) for quality. My opinion, GK.

  38. Sony, Nintendo AND Microsoft ALL released too soon by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    Yeah I said it,...

    Seriously now people, if you enjoy GAMEPLAY the GC / Xb1 and the PS2 have a plethora of good games for them right now.
    Some of the more recent games look really quite nice too.

    All 3 companies should have "milked" their consoles closer towards a better end of life, Nintendo 18 months, Sony 12 and MS 24 (my opinion, based on their release date, graphical ability and quantity of games)

    This way they could have focused on ensuring these new consoles are up to scratch in all depts - online, graphic ability, cost to manufacture, 3'rd party game support etc.

    Mark my words on this, mark my words - all 3 companies are going to be terribly shocked to see people continue to purchase the old consoles for quite a while.
    You thought the PS1 lasted a long time after the PS2 came out? You ain't seen nothing yet, these new systems won't sell diddly shit for several years (compared to their expectations)

    MGS3 / Okami / Shadow of the Colossus / God of War / GT4 / Guitar Hero 1&2 / FFXII / GTA:San And / Onimusha series
    PS2 games, all quite good to play all look quite good and all will keep selling the system for a while - none of those games look specifically "terrible"

    Psychonauts / Halo 2 / GTA:San And / Lego Star Wars / Fable TLC / Jade Empire / Beyond Good and Evil / Ninja Gaiden / Forza
    Xbox - same as above, most look quite good, play good are likely bargain bin games now and are worth investigating.

    Resident Evil 4 / Metroid Prime / Wind Waker / Lego Star Wars / Need for Speed Carbon / Beyond Good and Evil / Monkey Ball / Various sport ports / Pikmin
    GCube - again, some good games, cheap as chips to buy, looks pretty darn good overall - bargain bin games.

    Don't get me wrong people - we need to move forward, but the PS1 was OLD and shitty when we got the PS2, this time round I couldn't comfortably say that any of the 3 systems out are "shitty"
    It's a good time for us as consumers IF we have the balls to stop being consumer whores and stick with the old systems, used or discounted games and wait for them to STOP their microtransaction / overpriced / shit online strategies (one from each manufacturer there, guess which is which...)

    The summary: if Sony don't drop prices fast they are going to be hurting even more from lack of adoption - they are in a race which is going to prove to be EVEN MORE expensive than they first suspected.

  39. 4 xboxs? yeah right.... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Surely more are sold through 2nd hand dealers, or even small shops.

    Maybe sony counts all machines out of factory for that week.

    Again, surely there are more than 4 people in a land of 180 million that would buy an xbox-1, its not like
    they ALL are rich, there are smaller cities, and poor people everywhere.

    What are xbox sales in korea like? I thought they hate the Js and would never touch a Sony console.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:4 xboxs? yeah right.... by AliasTheRoot · · Score: 1

      No hard numbers to back it up, but i'd imagine negligable. The Korean gaming industry is PC based.

  40. No? by LKM · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Doesn't that essentially equate to them not liking stuff because it's not Japanese???

    No. It equates to Japanes people not liking stuff because the seller was too fucking stupid to figure out what they actually wanted. The 360 simply has very little games that appeal to Japanes people. Hence, no sales.

  41. You're a funny little man by LuciferosX · · Score: 0

    The funniest is how he rounded 81,639 ps3s sold down to "about 81000" and rounded up the 360 sales from 3,864 to 4000. Even upped the Xbox number from three to four. You sir are a walking ball of hilarity.

  42. Re:Sony, Nintendo AND Microsoft ALL released too s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    this time round I couldn't comfortably say that any of the 3 systems out are "shitty"

    Me neither. However, I'm totally comfortable in saying that the release schedules for the Cube and Xbox are shitty, and have been for quite a while. If you've played everything you want to on those systems (which admittedly makes you either really picky or insanely dedicated to gaming), then it's time to move on.
    Mind you, the PS2 still has some good stuff incoming. That system is not yet dead, but of course Sony couldn't pump out PS3s fast enough for upgraders anyway making the PS2 is a current system in all but name.

  43. Re:Losing exclusive titles hurts by Pluvius · · Score: 1

    If you've played the later games (SW and DW5 onwards), you can see why Koei started releasing them on the 360 rather than the XBox - when you play the PS2 version, having a lot of troops on screen really pushes it in a bad way. Enemies disappear but are still able to hit you, or the PS2 even crashes.

    Putting the games on the PS3 should nullify that problem.

    Bladestorm is/was one of the PS3 games that really interested me, apart from Devil May Cry 4. It's a new franchise, but it's the Hundred Years War version of the Warriors games so it's most probably in Koei's "million seller" genre.

    I'm not sure if Medieval Warriors (if I may call it that) will have the same appeal among Koei's fanboys as the others do. But it's certainly possible.

    Rob

  44. The original Xbox is a GREAT indicator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're missing the real point. I would be a fool to buy an XBOX... because? Of the games! there aren't that many games and never will be, the system was abandoned as soon as MS could make more with a new console line. It's obviously going to happen again. The 360 isn't going to be MS's console in 4 years and 360 owners may find themselves in the same boat.

    I wonder how many PS2's sold? Sony treats its consumers a lot better than Microsoft does, whether that's popular knowledge on Slashdot or not. If I buy Sony's new console, I know it will be backed for a long long time. It's been that way for the better part of twenty years and a quarter billion systems.

    Quarter Billion systems with thousands of good games and hundreds of great ones. Compare that clientèle with XBOX or Gamecube. Sony has a huge problem making PS3's, but if they ever do make a lot of them, there are a lot of people out there who will remain loyal because they want their system to be supported for a decade (in order to build a great library. Buy a PS2 today, and ou benefit instantly from the most diverse and compelling library of any system. And Sony has done a much better job getting their new systems to run their old libraries than any other console maker.

    I don't want to spend all that money for a 3 or 4 year iteration of XBOX that's never going to have a long enough run to build a great library. And does anyone seriously think it will?

    No, in a few years the 360 will be as unpopular as the xbox 1.0 is today.

    Of course, I've just made the best argument for the PC game of all. Once PC gaming becomes easy to do at the couch, this console thing may be far less important. Sony seems to be trying to head that off with a console that's also a crappy PC. Wonder how that will turn out.

  45. Sony is starting to sound like Sega/Nintendo did by analog_line · · Score: 1

    From the Newsweek blog entry/article.

    When asked whether Sony's resurgent strength as a console games publisher was pushing the company to shun exclusives, Tretton denied it. "We're the only company in this industry that's got development resources and talent that have established Number one hits on all three continents," he says, which is true, since the bulk of Microsoft's studios are in North America and Europe, while Nintendo's are concentrated in Japan. "We really feel like we're well positioned to contribute platform-defining games from a first-party standpoint, and we're not dependent on third-party community to the degree that a Microsoft would be.

    Wasn't the line for why the GameCube wasn't the #1 console, and the reason the Dreamcast died exactly that kind of talk?

  46. Zelda is a red herring. by Manmademan · · Score: 1

    Twilight princess is a Gamecube Game that's been delayed repeatedly for over a year. It's not accurate to call it a launch title for the Wii, as it wasn't designed around the hardware.

    1. Re:Zelda is a red herring. by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      Neither were most of the PS2 launch titles, yet there they were at launch and only playable on a PS2 so they count. Rayman for the Wii was also designed from the ground up around the Wii controler and is extremely fun.

  47. SETH SCHIESEL from the NY times = bad review by dcdz78 · · Score: 1

    Everything about his article was purely opinion, which is fine but come on... It falls right in the quality of reviews that are found in High School newspapers with the (I think this product sucks because I don't like it.) It's just to early to come to the "Seth Schiesel" conclusion. It takes awhile for the software to expose the hardware's full potential.