Slashdot Mirror


How To Tell If Your Cell Phone Is Bugged

Lauren Weinstein writes to point us to his essay on the realities of using an idle cell phone as a bug, as a recent story indicated the FBI may have done in a Mafia case. From the essay: "There is no magic in cell phones. From a transmitting standpoint, they are either on or off... It is also true that some phones can be remotely programmed by the carrier to mask or otherwise change their display and other behaviors in ways that could be used to fool the unwary user. However, this level of remote programmability is another feature that is not universal... But remember — no magic! When cell phones are transmitting — even as bugs — certain things are going to happen every time that the alert phone user can often notice."

338 comments

  1. How to tell by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    You could check the old fashioned way - slide off the back cover if an insect falls out you can be sure it is bugged.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:How to tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tell my phone everything that is going on in my life. When I hear the FBI agent snoring, I know my phone is being bugged.

      Signed, /. reader

    2. Re:How to tell by Nichole_knc · · Score: 1

      if you believe your phone is bugged in this fashion.. Try RAID.... Do they make a phone de-bugger fogger???

    3. Re:How to tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remove the battery when you don't want the hassle of being bugged. This makes more room for organic bugs!

    4. Re:How to tell by Inner_Child · · Score: 1

      Well, the easiest way to tell if you're phone's bugged is to be a law-abiding citizen. If you fit the description, then yes, you've probably been bugged. Now excuse me while I improve my tinfoil hat.

      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
  2. Not a bug by JonathanR · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not a bug, it's a feature!

    1. Re:Not a bug by dattaway · · Score: 3, Funny

      640 minutes of evidence ought to be enough for anyone.
      --Robert Gates

    2. Re:Not a bug by Sillygates · · Score: 1

      So...Can I blame the FBI when my Treo crashes and restarts?

      --
      I fear the Y2038 bug
    3. Re:Not a bug by cerberusss · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's not a bug, it's a feature!
      Let me correct your spelling:
      It's not a bug, it's the future

      :D
      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    4. Re:Not a bug by aplusjimages · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does this include family and friend minutes? Or are those still free?

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    5. Re:Not a bug by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Well, in terms of EMI problems from GSM phones, you couldn't have said it better.

      In the essay, the EMI problems (normally a bug/annoyance) are used as an indication your phone is doing something it shouldn't.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    6. Re:Not a bug by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      Only for 2 out of the 5 times a day it crashes. The other 3 times are caused by unknown sources, and if you find out what they are Palm would like to talk to you so they can finally fix the problems.

    7. Re:Not a bug by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      Have you ever listened to Tricka Technology by MC A Skillz and DJ Krafty Kuts?
      Whenever I heard that on the radio, I always thought that they must have gotten the inspiration for that rhythmn from the GSM interference sound.

  3. Irony by $pearhead · · Score: 1

    Wow, this is really a huge problem that has been bugging me for some time...

  4. Disposable phones by Threni · · Score: 1

    Just use a pay as you go phone, and get a new one every month or so.

    1. Re:Disposable phones by cronius · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, I recommend everyone to do this. I also recommend everyone to change the apperance of their face with plastic surgery once a year, just in case. Also, only use rental cars, and change these just as often. Only pay by cash, change what appartment you're living in as often as you can. Sleep with a gun underneath your pillow, have few friends, and don't tell them much about yourself. It's all about protecting yourself from the government, we're all suspects until proven guilty after all.

      --
      Life is Reality
    2. Re:Disposable phones by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just use a pay phone. Get rolls of dimes from the bank.

    3. Re:Disposable phones by sbryant · · Score: 5, Funny
      Just use a pay phone. Get rolls of dimes from the bank.

      It's easier said than done. There aren't as many payphones about as there used to be*, and a lot of those that are left require phone cards.

      Then, when you do find a suitable one, how do you know it isn't bugged already?

      Lastly, getting a roll of dimes from the just isn't that easy in most of the countries in the world. Of course, most of the world's payphones don't accept dimes either...

      -- Steve

      * The UK has a unique situation: while the number of payphones in the UK may have decreased, the number of British Telephone Boxes has remained about the same - they've just moved to more exotic locations in other countries. The same goes for British Police Boxes, except that their movements appear not to be limited to the first three dimensions.

    4. Re:Disposable phones by 4solarisinfo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get rolls of dimes from the bank.

      And a time machine...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payphone
      "In the United States, the coin rate for a local direct-dialed station-to-station call from a payphone has been 50 in most areas since mid-2001"

    5. Re:Disposable phones by Dzerzhinski · · Score: 1

      In the US, use a payphone. In Korea, you have to do a lot of looking to find a payphone that still works, since virtually everyone has a cell phone. And, you need to find a vending machine that still sells phone cards, because most of them don't take cash.

      --
      Never trust a physicist further than his DeBroglie wavelength.
    6. Re:Disposable phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      British Police Boxes, except that their movements appear not to be limited to the first three dimensions. I wish i had modpoints..
    7. Re:Disposable phones by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      And a time machine...

      Hey, sorry, I'm not American. A "dime" is just a movie cliche for me. The point was of course to use a public phone and cash. Or mooch a free call from a shop when you buy something; I'm a Luddiyte when it comes to mobile phones and depend on public phones and "the kindness of strangers" for calls on those rare occasions I'm away from my desk.

    8. Re:Disposable phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And a time machine... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payphone "In the United States, the coin rate for a local direct-dialed station-to-station call from a payphone has been 50 in most areas since mid-2001"
      ...Or you could put in 5 times.
    9. Re:Disposable phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disposable cell phones do little to prevent being bugged. It is not hard to figure out the IMEI of the cell phone you are carrying from a distance. Cell phone test gear and a directional antenna are all that you need. The test gear is not cheap, but well within the budget of most city police departments.

    10. Re:Disposable phones by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Many public payphones in the US were removed - especially in inner cities - at the request of the police and federal law invesitigative agencies as part of the "drug war", to interfere with dope dealers' use of them for communication with their customers and suppliers. (They tried to get them ALL removed but SOME sanity prevailed.)

      That's also why a lot of pay pay phones won't take incoming calls.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    11. Re:Disposable phones by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      So now that the drug dealers are all using cellphones can we have the payphones back?

      *sigh*, I thought not.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  5. great advice by macadamia_harold · · Score: 5, Funny

    When cell phones are transmitting -- even as bugs -- certain things are going to happen every time that the alert phone user can often notice.

    For example, when using a Palm Treo 650, the phone will crash and reset often, and without notice.

    1. Re:great advice by roseblood · · Score: 2, Funny

      When cell phones are transmitting -- even as bugs -- certain things are going to happen every time that the alert phone user can often notice.

      For example, when using a Palm Treo 650, the phone will crash and reset often, and without notice.


      Dude! My XP box must be bugged!

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    2. Re:great advice by gavriel407 · · Score: 1

      Actually, we were using the assisted GPS feature on a CDMA Treo 650 to track a user. Whenever we pinged his phone, it would drop a call, restart, or both. Maybe you're being tracked...

    3. Re:great advice by frankmu · · Score: 1

      i realize the parent is mod'ed funny, but it should be modded insightful instead

      --
      Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    4. Re:great advice by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      *LOL* I think all Palm devices do that.

  6. Easy way to detect a bugged phone by siliconeyes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Like a poster on the earlier story commented, why not simply connect one of those flashy LED thingies to your phone? My mom has them, and every time she's on a call, or even on an incoming SMS, the LEDs go berserk!! They don't even need batteries and power themselves off the cellphone radiation. Pretty foolproof method, IMHO.

    1. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What happens if the bug does *not* use the GSM network and is simply an old fashioned AM transmitter?
      It can just be using the mic and battery for its service, but generally the chirps would give it fully away.

      Hell, if done properly it might wait until an actual call is in progress and then push its buffer upstream.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by conno · · Score: 3, Funny
      And as an added bonus all of the mafia dudes would know who is the most baaadass among them (from the perspective of the FBI) just by who's phone is always flashing in a epileptic inducing technicolored lightshow.

      Im sure they would love this.

      Does it sound like Capt obvious here just got his first mobile telephonic device? fta

      But if you're not on a call, and you hear a continuing rapid buzz-buzz-buzz in nearby speakers that lasts more than a few seconds and gets louder as you approach with your phone, well, the odds are that your phone is busily transmitting, and bugging is a definite possibility.
      --
      Diet Tip : Eat less!
    3. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      What happens if the bug does *not* use the GSM network and is simply an old fashioned AM transmitter?

      TFA isn't about hardware bugs, but software that hijacks your phone to send signals clandestinely.

    4. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by stormeru · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can't use this method. I am talking on the phone with my imaginary friend all the time but I don't have to really make a call. Now everybody on the street will think I'm nuts if that LED thing won't blink.

    5. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by Cee · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Like a poster on the earlier story commented, why not simply connect one of those flashy LED thingies to your phone? My mom has them, and every time she's on a call, or even on an incoming SMS, the LEDs go berserk!! They don't even need batteries and power themselves off the cellphone radiation. Pretty foolproof method, IMHO.
      I would strongly advice against using them. They take some of the radiation energy to make them light up, which makes the phone think that the coverage is worse than it is which in turn makes the phone crank up its transmitting power.
      In effect, the phone radiates more than necessary and the battery gets drained faster.
    6. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean you can't string 10 millions LEDs around a phone and light up a whole city for free while you talk on your phone? Stupid physics laws!

    7. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by asb · · Score: 1

      In effect, the phone radiates more than necessary and the battery gets drained faster.

      The idea is to detect if the phone is listening while a call is not being made. We already know that FBI listens to criminals during the actual phone calls (through the service provider, the old way). And cell phone radiation is a problem only when the phone is next to one's brain. Since the flasher has no function while a call is being made (it flashes anyway) so it can be taken off if radiation is being considered a problem.

      And if FBI is really a problem for you, then I think you can afford to recharge your phone just a little bit more often.

      --
      Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
    8. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by japa · · Score: 1
      I would strongly advice against using them. They take some of the radiation energy to make them light up, which makes the phone think that the coverage is worse than it is which in turn makes the phone crank up its transmitting power. In effect, the phone radiates more than necessary and the battery gets drained faster.
      ...and it was that extra radiation that was required for the leds to blink. So outside the blinking antenna, radiation level is same than without the leds.
    9. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by tricorn · · Score: 1

      I don't know what typical cell-phone batteries are rated for, but for example for two typical NiMH AA cells (2800 mAh each), the LEDs are probably using no more than about 3-6% of the total battery capacity per hour (depending on how many and what kind and how bright the LEDs are; 3% would be about 10 typical red LEDs, 15 mA @ 1.7V).

    10. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by sarbrot · · Score: 1

      this also may happen when your phone is switching providers or something. my german o2 phone also gives me access to t-mobile's network and sometimes for no reason it will switch, while i am not moving.. then those bzzz-brrr-bzzz sound also appear

    11. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by badzilla · · Score: 1
      What happens if the bug does *not* use the GSM network and is simply an old fashioned AM transmitter?

      That flashes too - I tried it with various transmitters including PMR446 ("Family Radio) walkie-talkies and microwave ovens. They all produce enough of the right radiation to make a cellphone novelty toy flash.

      --
      "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    12. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by vettemph · · Score: 1

      The LED was my first thought and then i realized that the bug could use the "voice recorder" in the phone and only transmit the data in parallel to your normal phone calls. The phone has memory; voice data can be recorded at much lower bit rates than music, reducing the file size dramatically. Battery removal coupled with the LED would seem to be the only option... But... There is the posibility that a very small battery/cap can power the recorder for some time after the main battery is removed. Since you would remove the main battery RIGHT BEFORE a sensitive conversation, the alternate battery would not need to last long. You have my condolences regarding your civil liberties and human rights. The only reason these violations can continue is because we are far to dependent on the electrical grid and such that we cannot stage a proper revolution. We are a victim of our own fear of the elements. Excuse me, I have to go hide under my roof with my warm heating blanket.

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    13. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it not possible they bugged this guy by wiring another transmitter (using a lower frequency perhaps) up to the microphone? That way nothing unusual happens to the phone apart from the battery draining quickly.

      Surely if they had of made the phone call continuously the battery would have drained in a few hours. Also would the guy get billed for the calls? There was a case in germany a few years ago where the police where listening to voicemails and a load of suspects got the bill for it.

    14. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by aug24 · · Score: 1

      What power do they take? A milliwatt?!

      I wouldn't worry about 'em.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    15. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      There's not enough room in the phone case for a AM transmitter. Also, it's FAR easier to use the cell network as you can be ANYWHERE in the world to get the information.

      --

      Gorkman

    16. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i noticed that when i put my phone by a device that has a speaker (TV set, land line phone with the speakerphone), i hear the clicking and humming sounds from that speaker. 3-5 seconds after the sounds, the phone rings, so probably those sounds are just a handshake between the phone and the tower before routing the call. But sometimes i get those sounds when the phone is off, which i guess is an indication the phone communicates with the tower even in the off state. btw, mine is old nokia. anybody else noticed this?

    17. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not bugging, all phones do that. Phones don't stay in constant contact with the tower, unlike what people think. That would suck the batteries as much as a converstation.(1)

      No, a cell phone, is 99% of time when not in use, merely a radio receiver, which uses a lot less power. They watch the incoming signal, and chat with the tower, or a new tower, whenever they don't have enough signal on the old one. (Actually, I think they chat with any new tower they see on general principles.) This makes sure the tower knows who they are. They also do this at apparently random intervals. That's the thingy causing interference in speakers.

      When a phone call comes in, the last X towers that saw your phone go 'Hey, I've got a call for phone #8578289829.' or whatever. Hopefully some tower is still close enough for your phone to hear, which then causes your phone to immediately check back in with whatever tower it thinks is best and find out what's happening. It also does this check-in before an outgoing call, which is the major reason it takes two or three second before the phone at the other end starts ringing, and why you can cancel calls after you make them if you're fast enough, which is damn near impossible on land lines.

      So, basically, that's your cell phone trying to hook up to the network, as opposed to just passively watching the cell tower strength. I actually think it's even more complicated than that, and your cell phone and tower have to negotiate a time slice and private frequency and all sorts of crap, at least for actually connecting calls to the phone. (It would be sorta stupid to have to do that just say 'I am here' and then disconnect.)

      Aptly, my phone just did that while I was typing this.

      1) Incidentally, that would be the way to figure out if your cell phone is bugging you. Talking to people usually takes about ten times as much power as not, so there's your test. You can probably get exact power meter software instead of having to use that little bar.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    18. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean those led antenna things? are they an addon? or do they replace the antenna? i just know the one i had on my older phone was a full antenna replacement. would seem like a good way to see if your phone was behaving odd.

    19. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by valintin · · Score: 1

      Why can't the phone just record your conversation to the memory card and broadcast it later during a normal phone call?

    20. Re:Easy way to detect a bugged phone by munpfazy · · Score: 1

      True enough. But, the parent's second point is still valid. Software that encodes your audio (presumably into some highly compressed low bitrate format) and then sends the data out only during a call would escape detection.

      While I don't know for a fact that modern cell phones could be made to do this with only software changes, it doesn't seem too unlikely. (Whether those software changes could be initiated remotely without any user interventions is another question. One would sure *hope* not - but I wouldn't put it past cell phone makers to install a remote back door.)

  7. Bip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Bip-b-b-bip. B-b-bip. B-b-bip. B-b-bip. B-b-bip. B-b-bip. Bip-biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiip.

    Yeah. You're being bugged.

  8. No content by Nasarius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The "essay" is nothing but speculation with a few facts, no references, and no actual testing or experience. I'm sure this is an amusing blog entry, but why is it on Slashdot? There's nothing to discuss.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
    1. Re:No content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here...

    2. Re:No content by Chacham · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The "essay" is nothing but speculation with a few facts, no references, and no actual testing or experience. I'm sure this is an amusing blog entry, but why is it on Slashdot? There's nothing to discuss.

      Just like your comment?

    3. Re:No content by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      "Getting warm" and "battery running down" are obvious from the physics.

      I've done testing on a TDMA phone (both to be sure that it doesn't bug me and to see what it's pattern of "checking in" with the base station is) and I can confirm that the bulk of his descriptions are accurate.

      I can also tell you WHY:

      The "buzzing" occurs because the phone (both my TDMA and his GSM) transmits bursts of packets rather than operating continuously. The transmitter is only on for a moment during each burst, so you only hear the on/off switching when it interferes with other electronics.

      It interferes with other electronics because the signal, when on, is strong enough to affect the voltages in the semiconductors. (Typically this happens by providing enough of a momentary voltage to forward-bias a diode or other junction - and even FET circuitry has effective P/N junctions - acting like a crystal set near a strong transmitter.) Digital circuitry may have enough noise immunity to continue functioning correctly despite the interference (unless it's strong), but the audio circuitry is affected directly, and there the signal is normally analog - with the interference simply adding to the audio signal.

      Because it's affecting the audio processing you don't need an actual radio - let alone one tuned to the microwave frequencies of the cellphone. Any audio amplifier that isn't extremely well shielded will work just fine.

      Like a crystal set the audio amplifier only detects AM - but the switching of the output amounts to extreme amplitude modulation, so it is picked up just fine.

      He's right that if the cellphone is acting as an audio bug using the normal transmitting mode you'll get exactly the same buzz as you'd get from an actual call (as should be obvious).

      One thing that he said that doesn't correspond to my experience: The phone I tested "checked in" with the network every five minutes or so: But it only transmitted twice - two "pops" about a second apart - rather than buzzing with a packet stream. (Of course since I didn't do this test with a GSM phone and am not familiar with their protocols I can't give you any information on whether he's correct there.)

      Note that your location can be tracked just from the "check in", without any interference with the phone - or calls to it - at all. All it takes is for the phone to be on. (And if it has had its software tampered with - perhaps remotely - you can't be sure it's off unless you pull the battery.) This HAS been used to catch fugitives: In one instance (reported in the press) a serial killer on the lam cross-country powered up his cellphone on the road in rural Nevada and was in custody less than 30 minutes later.

      Some of the "blinky light" decorations (such as those in battery packs) have their own power source and do not pull any appreciable power from the transmission. (Just a trace to trigger the LED controller chip.) Unfortunately, once they've been triggered they run their pattern, so you can't use the blinking to determine the pattern of transmission bursts.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    4. Re:No content by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      The tip about speakers was based on practical experience. I used to be able to answer my Nextel phone before it started ringing because the call setup handshake made my speakers pop in rhythm.

    5. Re:No content by bibi-pov · · Score: 1
      There's nothing to discuss.
      The people who wrote the 320 comments before mine sure can disagree with you ! :) Remember this is Slashdot after all...
  9. Dear John by megrims · · Score: 1
    Don't be paranoid, but be careful.

    Be alert, but not alarmed.
  10. Mobster gratitude by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    As a spokes person of the Mobsters Who Read Slashdot club, I'd like to offer my gratitude for bring this guide to our attention.

    In return I offer 3 cheap bug puns for you to enjoy:

    It's a feature, not a bug!

    My phone isn't bugged, but I'm bugged by my phone.

    If insects fall out of your phone, it's bugged!

    Ha. Ha. Ha.

    Good night.

  11. That doesn't work, here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a pay-as-go phone they are not anonymous. In many places (e.g. Germany), you have to register your details to get it, in other places your purchase details are used from the credit card to register it.

    When I bought one with cash, just after I bought it, I received wrong number calls, but the people involved didn't seem to want to hang up like normal wrong number calls.

    Them: "Is Mark there?"
    Me: "I'm sorry, there's no Mark here, you must have a wrong number."
    Them: "I'm sorry, are you sure you're not mark"
    Me: "you have a wrong number"
    Them: "Oh my mistake, thanks again erm Mr erm...." pauses to see if you'll complete the sentence.

    This happened again and again and again, different scripts, but always a wrong number guy who just wouldn't go away. Until one day my wife answered and said my name.
    Her: "No this is ???????'s phone"
    After that I never received another wrong number call.

    Now I put that down to random chance, since I'm not worth spying on. But then my wife got a new pre-pay mobile, again she paid cash, and sure enough she got the same pattern of calls. We were talking about it yesterday, when the phone rang, and it was woman this time, who again was a wrong number, but didn't seem to want to hang up.

    Many different phone numbers used each time, we're building a list.

    1. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by CapitalT · · Score: 5, Funny

      Them: "Is Mark there?" Me: "I'm sorry, there's no Mark here, you must have a wrong number." Them: "I'm sorry, are you sure you're not mark" Me: "you have a wrong number" Them: "Oh my mistake, thanks again erm Mr erm...." Me: "Bond, James Bond"

    2. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by solanum · · Score: 1

      That always seems to happen to me as well. I think there is probably a simpler explanation, that the new phone numbers are given out in batches, so when you get a new pre-paid mobile, there's lots of other new mobiles with similar numbers being bought around the country and when you get a new number and hand it out to people, some of those are going to get it wrong. Multiply that up by simialr new numbers and you get quite a few wrong numbers....

      --
      Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
    3. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Funny

      What happens when you answer "Yes, this is Mark, what do you want?"?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    4. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by MicrosoftRepresentit · · Score: 1

      In my old flat, my phone number was the first 6 digits of the number anyone with the same area code as me would dial if they where ringing someone in a particular part of Australia, if they accidentally hit '8' instead of '0' for the first key. I got so many fucking phone calls at 6am from grandmothers ringing their relatives it was ridiculous.

    5. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice conspiracy theory, but you do realize that you're identifiable without your cooperation if you have a cellphone, don't you? The network always knows where a cellphone is, as long as the phone isn't turned off. The least amount of precision is which cell the phone is in, but there are other clues which often provide much higher precision. With this data one can create a profile of the places that the phone regularly visits. If one really wants to know who is using the phone and if one dedicates some resources to the task, then the location data combined with the list of numbers that call and are called will reveal the identity of the phone user (social networking is the more important source of information, btw).

      A more plausible explanation for the fishing calls is that someone wants to sell your name/number combination to an advertiser. Not that that isn't good enough a reason to avoid giving them your name, but you're probably more interesting as a consumer than as the target of a government surveillance operation.

    6. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by chr1sb · · Score: 1

      I agree that it is more likely to be for marketing purposes. If someone does call that fits the "fishing for a name" profile, give them a deliberately wrong name. Then, if anyone calls you using that name you know it's a marketing call and you can just hang up.

    7. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the UK is used to be possible to get pay-as-you-go phones and sims without registration. For years, I ran an O2 sim that wasn't registered, and every so often O2 would call me with special offers, and would try to get my details at the same time. The conversation would go something like this

      "Hello?"
      "Hi, this is $name from O2. We're calling to tell you about $promotion"
      "Ok, if it'll save me money"
      "First, for security can we confirm your full name?"
      "You don't know my name"
      "I can accept that as an answer. Now can you tell me your address and postcode?"
      "I never registered this phone, you don't have that to confirm"
      "I can accept that as an answer. What's your date of birth"
      "*Sigh* Can we just accept that you don't know who I am and it's staying that way?"
      "OK sir, would you like to hear about our new promotion? If you'd been using it already, you'd have saved 1 pound this month"
      "I don't think I'll bother"

    8. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now don't complain when SMERSH and SPECTRE come knockin' at your door.

    9. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by maddogdelta · · Score: 2, Funny

      Them: Is Mark there? Me : I told you already! Them : No you didn't Me: Yes I did. Them : No you didn't Me : I most certainly did....

      --
      -- There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    10. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Denial93 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are a couple of shops, in Germany and I'm sure in other places as well, which happily sell prepaid phones without proof of your identity. Telecafes, where you can make international calls at reduced prices, do that rather routinely. Some go as far as to offer three-day provider contracts, where they get to end the contract relationship (i.e. may delete your customer data) before any telephone surveillance order can even reach them.

      What you're experiencing may be an attempt (made by whoever) to respond to these anti-surveillance strategies. Did you buy your phones in a known "hot zone" like Berlin-Neukölln?

    11. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by spiderbitendeath · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sorry, is this a 5 minute call, or the full half hour?

      --
      Sometimes when I'm working on projects things disappear, I suspect gremlins.
    12. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Threni · · Score: 1

      > I have a pay-as-go phone they are not anonymous. In many places (e.g. Germany), you have to register your details to get it, in
      > other places your purchase details are used from the credit card to register it.

      So don't buy them in Germany, then. Pop over to the UK and stock up on a few of them, in cash, and get a local sim, or use a UK roaming sim abroad.

    13. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by alienw · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, you have to put in information to the New York Times, too. Nobody cares if you register your prepaid phone as Fucker McFucko living at 123 Fuck Off St and load it with a prepaid card paid in cash. Of course, the FBI will know your phone number as soon as you use the phone. Mafia people tend to call other Mafia people.

    14. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      My name is Mark, and nobody calls me...

    15. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Ruvim · · Score: 1

      The phone explodes!

    16. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by salec · · Score: 1
      What happens when you answer "Yes, this is Mark, what do you want?"?

      "Er, Mark, is that you, Mark... (waiting for you to end sentence)... er... (gives up) Carlson?"
      "Yes, it's me."
      "Uhh ... er ... sorry, wrong number!"
    17. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran into something a little similar in the US. I just dismissed it as having a reused cell number, having had wrong numbers happen on land lines as well. It too stopped after stating my name on the phone. But, interestingly, they started up again when I moved to a new area and didn't change my cell phone number. The new area just happens to be close to several major military and federal government facilities. ...just something that makes you think. Oh, and a side note, I don't make any international calls at all.

      It wouldn't surprise me if it was happening. If they are, they probably don't care about you, just that you've done something that warrents verification of who and where you are, not that you've done something wrong. They most likely would not even have a file on you, specifically. In this specific case, matching a name with a voiceprint and a GPS or triangulated location to the phone. If you where worth investigating, I figure they would probably get your name though other means.

    18. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are also other similar calls in the UK that are scams. When telcos first dish out mobile numbers, the prefix shows the operator. I got mine over ten years ago and the original operator is now known as "BT Cellnet". I've since transfered three or four times over the years, each time taking my number with me. I am not currently a BT Cellent customer.

      However, now and then I'll get a phone call asking me if I want to upgrade my "BT Cellnet" phone. They try their best to sound like the actual operator, but are careful to never actually say that. They are essentially cold-calling all of the numbers in the mobile "area" code and trying to get you to switch to their service.

      I've tried pressing them a few times, just to see how brazen they are. Once I asked how they got my details and the girl instantly hung up. Another, I pointed out that my phone was no longer Cellnet and that I knew they were war-dialing. Again, an instant hang-up.

      Complaints have been passed and handled by the UK telecoms watchdog, Oftel, but they just keep on adjusting their tactics to be borderline legal or to avoid getting a complaint in the first place.

    19. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Garabito · · Score: 3, Funny

      You: Hello?
      Mark: Hello. My name is Mark. Is there any messages for me?

    20. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by igb · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There are a couple of shops, in Germany and I'm sure in other places as well, which happily sell prepaid phones without proof of your identity.
      In the UK there's no requirement to even pretend to take ID. You can buy a phone for cash, a SIM for cash, top-up minutes for cash, etc, etc.

      It's a classic case of `unintended consequences': the assumption circa 1995 was that the big criminal issue was theft of service. At the time the only way to get a mobile was on a contract: you needed a bank account that would take direct debits, and some proof that you weren't totally sketchy with regard to credit. The only way the operators were going to build out their userbase in that environment is to redefine sketchy, and even then it's not going to get anyone under 16. So in the new world, sketchy would be redefined upwards (ie anyone the slightest bit dubious is refused credit), but pre-pay is universally available. Shazam: instantly you have a massive increase in mobile phone userbase. Fraud drops, because (a) GSM cloning isn't as easy as ETACS cloning (b) your contract customers are better risks but (c) most importantly the prices are falling and phone fraud isn't really worth the candle.

      However, for crims, losing the ability to sell phone time to Pakistan for half the standard rate is a small bump. Suddenly having access to completely anonymous, mobile, non-suspicious (as compared to hooky PMR equipment) point-to-point communication is like heaven on wheels. But once the genie is out of the bottle, how do you deal with the problem when every eleven year old has a phone (my ten year old daughter claims to be the only child in her class without one: I think she's exagerating, but not by much)? That forces you to permit cash top-up from people with no ID.

      ian

    21. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Inda · · Score: 1

      Put your tinfoil hats away people. You are all wrong (apart from the O2 user down the thread).

      UK pre-paid phones can be bought for cash. Stick the SIM in and it just works. There is nothing magic about it. Everyone and their dog does it here. I have never registered any of my phones.

      You can top it up with credit using cash. There are a billion ways of topping up your phone these days. ATMs, Shops, scratch cards, phone hot-lines...

      With some operators, if you don't use your SIM for a period of 6 months they cut you off and reassign the the number to a new pre-paid phone SIM.

      All the operators here offer free SIM cards from their websites. I have a stack of SIM card here, all networks. They all offer free credit after I stick the first ten quid on it.

      The UK is not the USA yet. Put your tin-foil hats in the bin.

      P.S. Prepaid SIM cards here are often roaming SIMs too. No fucking about when you travel. Step off the plane, get a text message from a local operater and blow.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    22. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to receive phone calls from some angry woman who wanted to know why I had not paid any maintanance for my kid. It would have been very funny since I have no kids except that she used to call in the middle of the night or in the early hours of the morning. The calls stopped when she called me when I was drunk and I told her that my dick was shot off in a hunting accident when I was 12 years old.

    23. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by ROMRIX · · Score: 1

      Me: "Who is it?"
      Them: "It's me Dave man, open up I got the stuff."
      Me: "Who is it?"
      Them: "It's me Dave man, open up I got the stuff."
      Me: "Who?"
      Them "It's Dave man open up I think the cops saw me come in here."
      Me: "Who is it?"
      Them: "It's It's Dave man will you open up I got the stuff with me!"
      Me: "Who?"
      Them "Dave man open up!"
      Me: "Dave?."
      Them "Ya Dave man open up I think the cops saw me come in here."
      Me: "Dave's not here."
      Them "No man I'm Dave! Hey come on man!"
      Me: "Who?."
      Them "It's Dave man will you open up man I got the stuff with me."
      Me: "Who?."
      Them "Dave man open up!"
      Me: "Dave?"
      Them: "Ya, Dave!"
      Me: "Dave's not here!"
      Them: "No man I am Dave man Will you, come on, open up the door will you? I got the stuff with me I think the cops saw me!"
      Me: "Who is it?"
      Them: "Oh what the hells wi..OPEN UP THE DOOR IT'S DAVE!
      Me: "WHO?"
      Them: "DAVE, D. A. V. E. WILL YOU OPEN UP THE DAMN DOOR?"
      Me: "Dave?"
      Them: "Ya Dave!"
      Me: "Dave?"
      Them: "Right man Dave, now will you open up the door?"
      Me: "Dave's not here!"
      Them: "ohhh..."

    24. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truly paranoid among us assume that they were delaying in order to triangulate your position.

    25. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Them: "Is Mark there?"
      Me: "Yes, this is Mark, I told you not to call until you'd dumped the body"

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    26. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The system used in Europe is different than that in the USA. In the states, a pay as you go phone is completely anonymous, you buy the phone, and then buy cards with minutes on them and just type in the number. I like the European system better though, because you can charge it at almost any ATM, whereas the US system you have to find specific stores that carry the cards. Just so you know.

    27. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by Bugs42 · · Score: 1

      Them: "Is Mark there?"
      Me: "I'm sorry, could you hold on a minute? *Pause* Yeah, get a couple more photos of the body, and don't forget to check for fingerprints..."

      --
      Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
    28. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by trentblase · · Score: 1
      The UK is not the USA yet.

      True, we haven't had as much luck installing all those surveillance cameras.

    29. Re:That doesn't work, here's why by thegnu · · Score: 1

      The calls stopped when she called me when I was drunk and I told her that my dick was shot off in a hunting accident when I was 12 years old.
      wowow.
      wow.
      ow.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
  12. Bug Detector by eclectro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Put your cell phone next to your computer speakers. If it's transmitting you'll know it.

    Sorry FBI for killing your wiretap program.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Bug Detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry about it: they'll just turn you over the the CIA. You'll love their secret prisons and free waterboarding services!

    2. Re:Bug Detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, it's almost like you read the article!

      Almost, but not quite.

    3. Re:Bug Detector by eclectro · · Score: 1

      I did RTFA, after I posted first. I am on slashdot after all :). I should have made that post in the original FBI story.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    4. Re:Bug Detector by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ...Sorry FBI for killing your wiretap program...
      I know you were trying to be funny. But I seriously doubt this will kill this wiretap program. Criminals are idiots. Most people are idiots. Take for example, this journalist who bought an unencrypted al qaeda laptop. Or how about the regular stories of criminals using yee old delete command to delete incriminating evidence. The world will continue to turn, criminals will continue to use cellphones, and the FBI will continue to bug them.
    5. Re:Bug Detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. It's like the people foaming at the mouth over the SWIFT "program" which was neither a secret program nor even a government project in the first place, it was simply "how banks move money from one country to another". All the Republicans raving over the fact that the NYT revealed that banks kept track of where your money went? Like, totally, oh my god! They must have thought that their bank printed out their monthly statement one line at a time so they wouldn't have to bother keeping any records!

      If Al Qaeda was keeping its money in banks, they were idiots. Especially after the US Government started freezing accounts linked to suspected terrorists, if that wasn't a warning to terrorists to quit using the banking system, they'd have ignored the NYT story too.

    6. Re:Bug Detector by Bright+Apollo · · Score: 1
      Put your cell phone next to your computer speakers. If it's transmitting you'll know it.


      Plus-one for this, it's true. I keep my cell phone right next to the PC speakers, and each time it "reaches out" I can hear a patterned tone of low freq through the speakers.

      -BA

    7. Re:Bug Detector by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      Cingular seems to do this more than other carriers

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    8. Re:Bug Detector by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. I can always hear clicking and humming of a certain type on my PC speakers and headphones 3-5 seconds before my cell phone rings.

      It freaked my wife out until I finally let her in on what was happening. From her perspective I was just sitting there using headphones and then I am picking up the phone and talking to people, without even hearing the phone ring.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    9. Re:Bug Detector by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      It's a TDMA thing. GSM is based on TDMA-style transmissions, so it affects Cingular and T-Mobile GSM services. It also affects traditional Nextel iDEN (another TDMA variant) transmissions.

      TDMA is time-division multiplexing. That basically means that every phone on a tower gets a slice of time to do a burst transmission of buffered data. Those bursts are all over the frequency range, making some of them interfere with analog receiver circuitry (CRT's, speakers, etc.).

      CDMA is carrier-division multiplexing, which limits each phone on a tower to a specific frequency, but with nonstop transmission/reception. Unless the frequency in use specifically interferes with a device, you won't see any interference since the frequency doesn't change.

    10. Re:Bug Detector by skuzz03 · · Score: 2, Informative

      However, this doesn't work with CDMA handsets unless you are in a very weak signal area.

      American GSM handsets transmit up to 1.6W output, Euro GSM at 2.0W output. Nextel handsets following the GSM spec to some degree on the backend but still requiring FCC licensed power output for user safety transmit somewhere in the range of 1.6 watts.

      American CDMA handsets at 850MHz transmit at 200mW max, while 1900MHz transmit at 150mW max. (Verizon, Alltel, Sprint, etc.)

      You can only pick up a CDMA handset's transceiver if you have cheap speakers, turned up very loud, in a very very weak signal area and the handset is screaming at maximum output power - otherwise they are ghostly silent.

      Also, when you live or make most of your calls right next to a cell site, even a GSM handset's transceiver is so quiet that you can't easily pick it up without some work.

      Not exactly the most foolproof method to detect if your handset is transmitting.

    11. Re:Bug Detector by bogd · · Score: 1
      Why do I get the feeling that nobody around here ever reads TFA???


      "But if you're not on a call, and you hear a continuing rapid buzz-buzz-buzz in nearby speakers that lasts more than a few seconds and gets louder as you approach with your phone, well, the odds are that your phone is busily transmitting, and bugging is a definite possibility. Note that this particular test is much less reliable with non-GSM phones that use CDMA (e.g. Sprint/Verizon phones), since CDMA's technology is less prone to producing easily audible local interference."


      (yes, that IS taken from the article...)

  13. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this blog entry has no useful content. READY OK

  14. How to tell if your cell phone is bugged... by kbox · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... It's when your girlfriend, for no apparent reason, says: "who is nikki and why is she telling you to get tested for syphilis?"

    1. Re:How to tell if your cell phone is bugged... by yanyan · · Score: 2, Funny

      You lost me at "girlfriend."

    2. Re:How to tell if your cell phone is bugged... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, that's my ex's name.

  15. Cipher indicator by Jhan · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Slightly off-topic:

    An easy way to warn you that your GSM phone call may be intercepted: look for the cipher indicator icon. It typically looks like an open lock. If your phone displays this icon, the base station has turned encryption off for this call.

    This typically happens when the They have ordered the phone company to spy on you, or when reception is low.

    --

    I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

    1. Re:Cipher indicator by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Does this work on all cellphones? I've got a foreign (Japanese) phone, and I'm not sure if the carriers there would do such a thing and include an indication of doing so.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    2. Re:Cipher indicator by Aehgts · · Score: 1

      (IANAL)
      Hate to tell you this but even if the icon says it's encrypted that only means the radio transmission is encrypted... it doesn't help that a wire tap is on the *wires* within the system. That part of the traffic is generally unencrypted.
      So you are right, if the feds are sitting in a van listening to your phone's transmissions then perhaps the lousy phone encryption algorithms that the phone companies and carriers may or may not have actually implemented might slow them down.
      It is a moot point though as by law all phone companies *must* be able to give law enforcement agencies a way to listen in.
      That's how it is here in Oz.

      --
      "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" - Albert Einstein
    3. Re:Cipher indicator by ahillen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if They have ordered the phone company to intercept your call, why would they bother with turning off encryption anyway? IIt's not like the phone company needs to break it to intercept your call. f state authorities want to listen in to a conservation, they surely don't have to tune in on the air interface between mobile phone and base station. The call has to be routed through a phone network anyway.

    4. Re:Cipher indicator by ahillen · · Score: 1

      'conservation' and 'conversation' are just too similar... ;)

    5. Re:Cipher indicator by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      If the state authorities wanted to listen in on a conservation, they'd be bugging the Ranger Service instead of me anyway...

    6. Re:Cipher indicator by mcvos · · Score: 1
      Hate to tell you this but even if the icon says it's encrypted that only means the radio transmission is encrypted... it doesn't help that a wire tap is on the *wires* within the system. That part of the traffic is generally unencrypted.

      Exactly. The only way to have really secure communication is by encrypting on your end, and decrypting on the receiving phone. Cryptophones do that. I know Rop Gongrijp (spokesman of the Dutch hacker community in the late '80s and early '90s, founder of XS4all, the first Dutch public internet provider) developed on of the first cryptophones, but a quick google proves that there's a lot of choice in that department now.

      In any case, if you're really paranoid, controlling your encryption is really the only way. The only problem is that the receiver has to be able to decrypt it again.

  16. First Privacy, Then Those Other Freedoms... by Pavan_Gupta · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Ultimately, the question in this scenario goes far beyond the immediate problem posed here (cell phones being used as bugs), but lends itself to the more interesting question about why privacy should be held as one of the most important things in our society. I am of the persuasion that the following quote from The United States constitution should stand as one of the most important parts of our society -- and if you're not from the United States, than imagine that I'm suggesting you include this in your Government's constitution/body of laws if it is not already there...

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
    This has always stood as one of those easily reinterpreted components of the constitution -- just look at the way the US Supreme Court enjoys reinterpreting it. And, to some degree, I do see why this should be interpreted in a somewhat fluid way. There are terrorists/freedom fighters out there, and governments should be capable of protecting their citizens-- that is what they're ultimately designed to do.

    However, the egregious trampling of our right to privacy, as outlined in the US constitution, starts moving us very quickly in the direction of fascism. And people tend to use the term fascism lightly, but you have to ask yourself how a state can move from one type of government to another? History has shown that this happens everywhere -- just look at history

    So, why would I take a break from my ultimate presentation on latency markers in tuberculosis? Well, I feel strongly that you (the person reading this, not just the general "you") should take it upon yourself to encourage those people that you vote for to stand up and strengthen the first levee against tyranny -- our right to privacy. The FBI may, at this point, consider using your cell phone to track you as a legitimate means to and end, but when the FBI cycles through it's current leadership/membership then we can only hope that these means lead to good ends.

    And the hope that people mean well is not something I am willing to risk.

    1. Re:First Privacy, Then Those Other Freedoms... by Tankko · · Score: 1

      While I agree with everything you said, it is important to point out that in this case the FBI did have a completely legal warrant, as spelled out in the constitution.

    2. Re:First Privacy, Then Those Other Freedoms... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      It is ironic that in a country where the government derives its power from the people, that they invade the privacy of those people at an increasing rate, while operating at a level of secrecy never before seen.

      So, my phone can be tapped without a warrant, but I can't find out who the Vice President met with from the Oil Industry when creating an energy policy. And a Supreme Court justice who voted to maintain the VP's private meeting goes hunting with the VP just before the decision comes down.

      My only comfort is that from looking at his face, Vice President Cheney is as miserable and unhappy as a human can be. That makes me feel a little bit better.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:First Privacy, Then Those Other Freedoms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      This does end up having an on topic point: misusing the word Fascism is bad for political discourse.

      I know that Imperial Japan is widely interpreted as being a fascist state, but Westerners really don't seem to understand that fascism and proto-fascism were ideologies based around European historical constructs (like German Romanticism) that don't apply to a country like Japan. I do understand that the term will frequently be thrown around because of the unique historical status of Japan as the only non-Western modern colonial power. While there were groups close to the power of the Japanese Imperium, to characterize the Dai-TeiKoku as fascist is wholly inappropriate.

      Fascism is essentially the aestheticization of the socio-political sphere . You'll notice here that Imperial Japan is described as being authoritarian in nature. Why people refer to imperial Japan as authoritarian is also puzzling, because Japan was dominated by an authoritarian ruling clique essentially since its inception. If we want to refer to Japan only since the time of Hideyoshi and the establishment of the Tokugawa Shogunate, Japan has been under seriously repressive rule since circa 1600 up until its defeat by the United States.

      Many often will point to the promotion of the Showa emperor as a living God and the discourse of the Yamato race as examples of Japanese fascism; however, such constructions were built from the blocks of the European-inspired Enlightenment-era notions of a global racial hierarchy as a way to sidestep the Western racist gaze on Japan as being a member of the Asiatic "Yellow Race." They had nothing to do with European Fascism. While the Japanese may have viewed Westernization (ideological Westernization - as distinct from Rangaku, or Western Learning) as ultimately corrupting, the Imperial Japanese viewed themselves as equals of the "White Races" of the West - not as superiors.

      Furthermore, Fascism as understood in Germany and Italy were essentially mass-based movements. Imperial Japan was constructed by the social elite of the country, and in many ways is more similar to the British Empire than to Nazi Germany or Fascist Italy. Britain, on the other hand, had the benefit of conquering India a) before the genie of nationalism escaped its bottle, b) as the preponderant hegemon during Pax Britannica period of the 19th century, and c) as a European country conquering a non-European country.

      Japan, on the other hand, faced Chinese nationalism, other European powers that wanted a piece of the China pie, and a reinvigorated Soviet Union. Combined with no natural resources, an expansionist drive for autarky seemed reasonable at the time to the Japanese leaders. It allied itself with the Axis powers not because of any ideological affinity (indeed, most of the Imperium regretted deeply the abrogation of the bilateral treaty with Britain in the early 1920s - the Japanese saw themselves as the Britain of the East), but because Italy and Germany had no colonies in East Asia (whereas the Americans held the Philippines; the British Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, and India; the Dutch the East Indies; The French Indochina).

      Japan had the misfortune (and China and Korea the luck) of attempting to build an empire as the sun was set to dawn on 19th century style imperialism. Americans like to call Japan fascist because it makes American war crimes seem justified. /rant!

      Anyway, to link back to the topic, while Fascism is Authoritarianism, Authoritarianism IS NOT Fascism. Throwing around the F-word devalues its true meaning, and allows authoritarians to undercut such critics by labeling them leftys, pinkos, etc. No regular citizens in the West today actually believe that their government will become Fascist (especially because so many people misunderstand the term, and think of it in relation only to the Axis power governments), so using such terms will just cause you to isolate yourself in an argument. Most people may buy, however, that their government is making (or has made) a power grab and is on the track to becoming authoritarian.

    4. Re:First Privacy, Then Those Other Freedoms... by travail_jgd · · Score: 1

      I read the original article that started the whole topic.

      The cellphone bugging wasn't the FBI's first option to gather evidence. They had exhausted all other possibilities (physical bugs, etc), and went with a wiretap. Go find TF(Original)A for the info.

      I despise the current presidential administration's abuses of power. I value my freedoms more than the average person.

      But I have no problems with properly sanctioned and implemented evidence gathering. As long as the proper checks and balances are in place, freedom isn't being lost -- it's being preserved.

    5. Re:First Privacy, Then Those Other Freedoms... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This case had judicial oversight, but the principle is sound and here's an illustration.

      A man living under the Franco dictatorship asked a sympathetic secret policeman how to stay out of trouble with the government.

      The secret policeman didn't pull out the usual lie "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear". The secret policeman didn't say "Just obey the law". The advice was far simpler:

      "Be invisible".

    6. Re:First Privacy, Then Those Other Freedoms... by janzen · · Score: 1
      This does end up having an on topic point: misusing the word Fascism is bad for political discourse.

      Right; we're going to need some sort of Godwin's Law equivalent soon.

      Thanks for the interesting comments on Japanese history. As for the European varieties of fascism, their fundamental characteristics have been dissected in detail by the inimitable Umberto Eco, in a 1995 article called Eternal Fascism: Fourteen Ways of Looking at a Blackshirt.

    7. Re:First Privacy, Then Those Other Freedoms... by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Hi,

      This is the New York City Board of Health, and we are here to protect your children.

      We have a search warrant to see if you use any transfats in your kitchen. Please open the door now, or 50 bullets are headed your way.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  17. What about recording to internal memory? by loraksus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would seem to be much easier to have the phone record to its internal memory and then transmit later. Transmitting needs a fair bit of power (while recording to memory from the microphone doesn't take much and can be compressed) and I would think people would start to notice that their phone would be dead after powering it off for several hours.
    The amount of memory and processors in some modern phones makes this a possibility...

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    1. Re:What about recording to internal memory? by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With the new phones you could probably go further then that. Have it randomly listen in and then parse the conversations heard for keywords and if a keyword happened within a set time then listen in more.

      Compress what you want and then send it as burst transmission.

    2. Re:What about recording to internal memory? by iknowcss · · Score: 1

      Could you fit voice recognition software on a phone that already has the capabilities to take pictures, video, recording, play music, etc.?

      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    3. Re:What about recording to internal memory? by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      Most already have a simple voice recognition. My phone is a year old and has it. It would need to pattern match a preset number of words and you could probably pre-program these remotely by recording the persons voice on existing phone conversations.

    4. Re:What about recording to internal memory? by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      Could you fit voice recognition software on a phone that already has the capabilities to take pictures, video, recording, play music, etc.? Most modern phones already have VR... "Call [insert GFs name]" "Camera" "Dial #######" These commands (and more) are standard for many phones.

    5. Re:What about recording to internal memory? by Phuqem · · Score: 1

      And all if this will be for nothing, because if they've bugged the computers servicing the towers, it can split and forward both sides of the conversation and be completely transparent to you and your phone. With the money and the technology the government has, if they want to watch and listen, there's not much we can do unless we move into a bunker.

    6. Re:What about recording to internal memory? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      I would think people would start to notice that their phone would be dead after powering it off for several hours.

      Nah. They'd just think the rechargable battery needed replacement.

      Also: If they're programming the phone to record and then transmit later the logical time to transmit would be when the phone is charging - just after it reaches full charge.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  18. Only one call? Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    > First, when the phone is operating as a bug, regular calls can't be taking place in almost all cases

    This is often not true in the case of GSM phones - particularly those models targetted at business.

    GSM is capable of making two calls at once:- the other typically goes on hold and you switch between them, but hosting of conference calls is also possible.

    This is true of every Nokia I've owned over the the last 8 years and also the high-end Motorola I owned for a month before it was stolen.

    1. Re:Only one call? Not true by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      No. You can make one call whilst another's on hold. The conference calling is initiated by the handset, but relies on the *network* joining the calls - it is not done within the handset. You can send *data* simultaneously to voice, but not make two calls.

    2. Re:Only one call? Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      surely voice is just a form of data - or am I missing something fundamental here?

    3. Re:Only one call? Not true by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      If they are bugging your phone they are also going to be tapping your calls. When you make a call they will simple shut off the tap until you are finished.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:Only one call? Not true by tengwar · · Score: 1

      In general, you can't even send data (other than SMS) simultaneously with voice. The standards allow it, but it isn't usually implemented. Not sure how true this is for 3G phones, though.

  19. Old, old news by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 3, Funny

    The RISKS digest carried this news a few years ago.

    It's been long known that;

    1. some providers can download arbitrary software to some phones
    2. a phone can be running that software while appearing not to be making a call

    The potential for abuse is obvious.

    I gave up my mobile phone about a month ago now. I read through a full list of the ways in which the British State monitors me. When you read them all at once, it has quite an impact. The simple question I have is this: I am completely innocent. I have commited no crimes and am not suspected of committing any crimes.

    SO WHY AM I BEING WATCHED?

    1. Re:Old, old news by irote · · Score: 1

      Who says you are being watched? You sound a little paranoid...

    2. Re:Old, old news by gigne · · Score: 1

      I read through a full list of the ways in which the British State monitors me.
      Hmm... sounds interesting, got a link?
      --
      Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
    3. Re:Old, old news by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I am completely innocent. I have commited no crimes and am not suspected of committing any crimes."

      I'm sorry, but I cannot accept that anyone can live in Britain today and not commit any crimes. You've never driven over 70mph on a motorway? You've never put recyclable waste in your dustbin?

      There are so many laws in Britain today that you're pretty much a criminal the instant you get out of bed; in fact, you're probably a criminal if you stay in bed all day too. The real problem is _too many laws_, not too many criminals; if the cops stopped chasing people for bullshit crimes with high-tech gadgetry they could get all the real criminals off the streets.

    4. Re:Old, old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you've committed no crimes at all, you're DEFINITELY up to something.

      Alternately, if you're this paranoid when you're not worth watching, then perhaps they'd conclude you're mentally ill and need watching.

    5. Re:Old, old news by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're being watched because you're within six degrees of seperation with a terrorist.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:Old, old news by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The calls I make from my home phone have the time of the call and the phone number called recorded.

      The calls I made from my mobile had the time of the call, my location and the phone number called recorded.

      All the websites I visit, have the domain name recorded.

      All the emails I sent have the time of sending and the receipient recorded.

      When I pay by credit card, the location, time and amount of the transaction are recorded.

      When I cycle into town, I go past about six cameras - I'm recorded by each one.

      All of this information is available to the State without any form of judicial oversight. A policeman on a whim could keep a very close watch on my life.

      So I'm not being paranoid here - this list *IS* the list of the monitoring conducted on all of us.

      I've committed no crime. I'm totally innocent.

      Why am I being monitored? why does the State have to keep records of who I talk to and when I talk to them and where I am when I talk to them? am I suspected of something? I'm not. So why? because I *might* do something? that's outrageous! and in fact it's proper tantamout to suspecting me of something - it is suspected that I *might* commit a crime, which is just a weaker version of we *do* suspect you comitted a crime.

      What people don't realise is that although the State has always recorded plenty of information on us, the game has changed because of computers. Computers plus surveillance isn't just more of the same; it's something utterly new and *different*.

    7. Re:Old, old news by Bog+Standard · · Score: 1

      None of the above are crimes in the criminal sense. I am more worried about the info being used for decriminalised offences. Such as speeding and parking offences and the like. In fact the parking/traffic enforcement system is already using cctv and point to point camera/number plate recognition. The worry is how the government protects this (our) information.

    8. Re:Old, old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The calls I make from my home phone have the time of the call and the phone number called recorded.

      Recorded by the phone company. Police need a warrant to access this.

      The calls I made from my mobile had the time of the call, my location and the phone number called recorded.

      Recorded by the phone company. Police need a warrant to access this.

      All the websites I visit, have the domain name recorded.

      By your ISP, and typically kept for a very short amount of time. Police need a warrant to access this.

      All the emails I sent have the time of sending and the receipient recorded.

      Only by intermediary mail servers, not even by your ISP (unless you use them as your SMTP server). Police need a warrant to access this, and it takes a lot of time to track down, so they only do it for prime suspects in serious cases.

      When I pay by credit card, the location, time and amount of the transaction are recorded.

      Recorded by your credit card company. Police need a warrant to access this.

      When I cycle into town, I go past about six cameras - I'm recorded by each one.

      6 out of the hundreds of thousands in use in the UK, recording 24/7. Some in high risk areas are actively monitored, most are simply recorded on a rolling tape system, so only retained for a week. Unless there's a crime in the area, the tapes will never be looked at.

      All of this information is available to the State without any form of judicial oversight. A policeman on a whim could keep a very close watch on my life.

      Quite simply not true. You are overly paranoid. Unless you are already a suspect in a crime, the police cannot access any of these records.
    9. Re:Old, old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for a very short amount of time. Police need a warrant to access this.

      Unfortunately, no. A directive requires European member states to enact laws which make it mandatory to log connection metadata and keep the logs for at least 6 months. Some member states will require ISPs and other telecommunication providers to keep the logs for 2 years. Access to this data is regulated, but the limits on the purposes for which the data can be accessed are loosely defined and the telecommunication providers must provide an interface that doesn't allow them to detect when or what data is accessed.

      I used to have compassion for the people who call privacy advocates paranoid, but quite frankly, if you don't see it now, you're as blind as a bat.

    10. Re:Old, old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The law hasn't been enacted in the UK, and won't be until that EU directive has been challenged. Aside from the privacy aspects of it, there are serious objections about the cost of the storage and equipment to do this, and the security of the police interface. ISPs in the UK do not have this implemented as yet, but it is worth keeping an eye on.

    11. Re:Old, old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, to put it another way, why can the State be trusted with such information when the people can't?

      I'm all in favour of, for example, CCTV, on the basis that when you're in public, everything you're doing is public. But the camera feeds should be available to everyone, so that we can watch our government just as much as it can watch us.

    12. Re:Old, old news by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      Somewhere there is the somewhat famous quote I keep forgetting.. but it is exactly about making so many laws that everyone is guilty.. creating a path to control you.

      Oh, if I only I could remember it. :)

    13. Re:Old, old news by houghi · · Score: 1

      The explanation they could give is that you are inocent BECAUSE you know you are being watched. In belgium speeding camera's are well known. Also they are often anounced over the radio when there is a mobile control.

      They are even anounced on their website (Dutch)

      So the reason they monitor you is to keep you innocent.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    14. Re:Old, old news by Handpaper · · Score: 1
      Somewhere there is the somewhat famous quote I keep forgetting.. but it is exactly about making so many laws that everyone is guilty.. creating a path to control you.

      "Governments cannot rule honest men. The only true power governments have is to crack down on criminals. And when there are not enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that is is impossible to live without breaking some law."

      Ayn Rand, in "Atlas Shrugged"

    15. Re:Old, old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats the wrong question, citizen.

      The right question is : how come you try to hide your location or conversations with others from us.

      IF you're not a bad person you have nothing to fear from us. We just want to protect you.

      We are the good guys. We are the Gouverment.

    16. Re:Old, old news by autophile · · Score: 1
      Why am I being monitored? why does the State have to keep records of who I talk to and when I talk to them and where I am when I talk to them? am I suspected of something? I'm not. So why? because I *might* do something? that's outrageous! and in fact it's proper tantamout to suspecting me of something - it is suspected that I *might* commit a crime, which is just a weaker version of we *do* suspect you comitted a crime.

      Meanwhile, in a software development shop somewhere in deepest America...

      Application 1: The calls I make to the kernel have the time of the call and the call data recorded.
      Application 2: Uh huh.
      Application 1: The calls I make out to the network have the time of the call, my IP address, and the destination data.
      Application 2: A-yup.
      Application 1: All the files I visit, have the filenames recorded.
      Application 2: Yeah, look. Your log file is getting seriously big, and...
      Application 1: Why am I being monitored? why does the Developer have to keep records of who I talk to and when I talk to them and where I am when I talk to them? am I suspected of something? I'm not. So why? because I *might* do something? that's outrageous! and in fact it's proper tantamout to suspecting me of something - it is suspected that I *might* crash, which is just a weaker version of we *do* suspect you crashed.
      Application 2: (scribble)
      Application 1: *crash*

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    17. Re:Old, old news by Jtheletter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So the reason they monitor you is to keep you innocent.

      That's it, you win the doublespeak award this week and it's not even Tuesday yet. Your extremely light two sentences about Belgium announcing "mobile control" whatever that is, doesn't defend the above quote in the least. It's also a logical fallacy. People are not innocent only because they are being watched, they can be innocent just because they ARE, they don't need to be monitored to force them into that state. Others may (or may not) check their behavior knowing they are under surveillance, but being watched is certainly not a prerequisite for obeying the law.

      The reason 'they' - the state - monitor you is to catch you doing something wrong, anything. Maybe it wasn't even illegal last week, but it is this week and now you're guilty. With the huge numbers of laws on the books everyone is almost guaranteed to be guilty of something at some point, the only problem has been catching everyone in the act of breaking some law. With ubiquitous surveillance, monitoring algorithms, etc. the state now, more than any other time in history, can keep a dirty file on everyone. The state can only punish criminals, but if everyone is a criminal then the state has achieved another level of control and can selectively enforce prosecution at will to manipulate, coherce, and consolidate more power. That particular 'power' may even be something as minor as increasing traffic ticket revenue, but the result is the same.

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    18. Re:Old, old news by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      "When I cycle into town, I go past about six cameras - I'm recorded by each one."

      "You've never driven over 70mph on a motorway? "

      Umm, I gather he pedals to and fro. If he's doing 70mph, s/he's a HELLUVA FAST peddler.

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    19. Re:Old, old news by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Isn't it logical that if more than 50% of a population does something "illegal" (in a democracy) it shouldn't be illegal? Otherwise it's the few imposing their will on the majority, which means that it's no longer a democracy.

      But then again, perhaps we are all habitual line-steppers (some sort of excitement is gained apparently), so they set the laws to be arbitrarily restrictive but then allow (through statistics) a certain number of people to break them. However, once in a while that singles out a person who's really not a criminal and throws the book at them, just for bad luck.

      The problem is that there are a certain number of whackos that are getting away each day, but that just follows with the statistics also. We just need to be certain we're catching the real whackos more and not punishing the casual non-whacko law breaker any more than necessary. Find out how to do that, and you're an instant billionaire.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    20. Re:Old, old news by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "Isn't it logical that if more than 50% of a population does something "illegal" (in a democracy) it shouldn't be illegal?
      That's not a democracy then, it is a mob rule. The majority is not always right, hence the reason for laws.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    21. Re:Old, old news by StarfishOne · · Score: 1


      Thank you very much! This time I'll try not to forget it, because it's certainly a powerful quote.

    22. Re:Old, old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wherefrom do you think laws come?
      And why is it that you believe that a handful oligarchs which are selected based on their ignorance and heritage and not their merit are doing a better job than the majority?
      Why is it that you do not realize that the more people have to decide, the less probable is action and that inaction is in most cases the preferable course of action?

    23. Re:Old, old news by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "Wherefrom do you think laws come?"
      Laws come from congress, and are passed by representatives voted in.

      "And why is it that you believe that a handful oligarchs which are selected based on their ignorance and heritage and not their merit are doing a better job than the majority?"
      Why is it that you believe all elected congressmen are "oligarchs which are selected based on their ignorance and heritage" ?? That is just ridiculous. The people that pass laws are voted in by their respected states. If the majority of people want and "oligarch " than they can elect that person. Is the majority right or wrong then?

      "Why is it that you do not realize that the more people have to decide, the less probable is action and that inaction is in most cases the preferable course of action?"
      Why is it that you do not realize that sometimes the majority isn't always right?? For instance, the majority of American citizens are Christian. Does that mean it would be okay for the majority to outlaw every other religion?? Sometime laws need to be passed specifically to protect the minorities from the majories...Do some fact checking before you shoot your mouth off, Coward.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    24. Re:Old, old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I'm also six degrees of separation from Dick Cheney so they'd better not fuck with me or they'll lose their jobs.

    25. Re:Old, old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I may return in kind: Get a brain, Mister Whirly.
      I always check my facts, but why should I share them with you when you don't have the will and ability to think yourself?
      But fine, some more breadcrumbs:

      What the GP claimed is that the majority is not always right. This is obviously true. I nowhere said anything else, it is solely your belief that if the majority of the people is not right, then the majority of the people that very same majority elects has to be right, which commands you to think I believed otherwise.

      Congress are few, but makes the laws which he calls for to override the majority: Therefore, what he calls for is the dictate of the few. That they are voted upon does not matter: What you get is either a republican or a democrat or whatever two (and maybe a half) party system is in use in your country. Furthermore, being elected does not mean being able to do the job but does mean that they were good at playing make-believe with the populace.

      Also, if he claims for the majority to be wrong - that question seems to be at the rim of your mind - what are the elected representatives? After all, they are supposed to come to power by the will of the majority, thus they are wrong because those who elected them are wrong: It propagates through the whole system.

      Let me reiterate: I do not say that the majority is right. I say it is often wrong and such is anyone who derives his power from it. However, there is something you utterly fail to understand: the more people have to vote, the harder it is to create a majority. Of course, this means cessation of progress, as nothing moves anymore unless wanted by all, but as people prefer to regress and do such things like invading sovereign countries because their great leader tells them so, it is preferable to me, because I rather have less progress because some oppose than die and not see progress - or anything, for that matter - ever again.

      Finally: I do not give a shit whether christianity, islam, scientology any other religion outlaws all others, because I am outlawed and without rights to you in any case already, only the label you force upon me changes with the times. The more people they ostracize, the better. Maybe it finally motivates you to pick up your precious guns and actually take a shoot at the government as it was intended to instead of shooting at people who ring for a cup of sugar or those who take a shortcut over your overwatered lawn in the middle of the desert or having your children "accidentially" kill themselves.

    26. Re:Old, old news by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Huh! Sounds like you got the two-for-one deal.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    27. Re:Old, old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like someone forgot to take their pills this morning!

    28. Re:Old, old news by Builder · · Score: 1

      Why is it that you believe all elected congressmen are "oligarchs which are selected based on their ignorance and heritage" ??

      The GP was talking about British laws. You may find this shocking, but congressmen have nothing at all to do with our laws. We have an elected house (parliament) and an unelected house (lords, although this is changing). Historically, the house of lords was populated by people who were born to their station and had the post for life.

      Oligarch sounds like a good description for that, no ?

  20. er, tin-foil hat by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hello,

    Just as an experiment, I tried placing my cell phone into an anti-static mylar baggy and the signal went from 100% to 40% (or five bars to two). Repeating this with tin foil with a small opening to see the LCD (about 1cm^2) reduced the signal to 20% (or one bar).

    I am wondering that if someone wants to have a private verbal conversation sans listeners on the cell phone, all they have to do is place their cell phone in metal box?

    This would seem much more convenient than having to pull the battery out, as well as reduce wear and tear on the contacts or thin plastics of today's cell phones.

    Perhaps someone who is a bit more familiar with electronics could explain whether or not a "tin foil hat" (or a metal box or foil bag, ala Enemy of the State) for a cell phone would work?

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky

    --
    Dexter is a good dog.
    1. Re:er, tin-foil hat by jnelson4765 · · Score: 1

      One of these will work better - Mythbusters built one for one of their shows, and a lot of radio telescope facilities enclose their microwave ovens in 'em so that they don't interfere with the telescope...

      Not the most convenient thing to carry around, though. A clanshell case built out of acoustic foam would probably work as well. Or leaving the cell phone in another room. Or standing next to a waterfall or a large, noisy fan. Lots of things can be used to defeat most microphone-based eavesdropping.

      --
      Why can't I mod "-1 Idiot"?
    2. Re:er, tin-foil hat by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 3, Informative

      First, a bugged phone could still record what you were saying and transmmit that later. Remember that the people who bug phones don't want them to drain their batteries dry in only a couple of hours, it would be suspicious.

      Secondly, those bars are more a qualitative information than a quantitative one, at 4 or 5 bars, the signal is clear with low power, with less bars, it means that there are transmition errors or that the radio needs a boost, either way, it is an indication to the phone it might be a good idea to look for another base station, but only a "no signal" notification will prove (if you can trust your phone display) that it is incapable of communication. If you shield your phone, it won't see any good base station and will lose a lot of energy scanning the frequencies looking for one.

      You can try to shield your phone, but then, you need to test its effciency. I once tried to put a phone in a tin box and I still could call it. Of course, grounding that box terminated the call.

      So I would say shielding is a lot of effort for what you want, if you are only slightly paraniod, shut the bugger down, if you are a real paranoid, leave it at your place with the TV on (during a movie you already saw, in case they will check your alibi) then use the bus to meet whoever you need in a parking lot.

    3. Re:er, tin-foil hat by f0rtytw0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are worried about your phone listening in and you want to be absolutely sure just take the battery out. Signal goes to zero.

      --
      this is the most important sig ever! In your face 446154!
    4. Re:er, tin-foil hat by Uberwangen · · Score: 1

      You can purchase faraday bags used to prevent cell phones from receiving any signal.

    5. Re:er, tin-foil hat by jafac · · Score: 1

      Brass-mesh baggie - NO OPENINGS, must be GROUNDED.

      capiche?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    6. Re:er, tin-foil hat by mccabepa · · Score: 1

      This actually solves another vulnerability.

      In addition to blocking transmission, a box might block the "Recording of Sound" that might otherwise be stored for later piggyback transmissions. Sound Recording may be done without many of the aforementioned telltales....and a smaller battery.

  21. Oh so much easier in the old russian times by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 3, Funny

    You could tell that your phone was bugged, because you had an extra wardrobe in your room.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:Oh so much easier in the old russian times by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 2, Funny

      It still happens anywhere to a lot of people, it's called wedding. The funny thing is that they can't really complain, since it is the only spying procedure that involve opt-in.

    2. Re:Oh so much easier in the old russian times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why is J. Edgar Hoover on your phone?"

      "I don't know. He's on everyone else's, why shouldn't he be on mine?"

  22. Somewhere in a poorly lit dockyard... by ettlz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gangster 1. OK, so I'll just phone [insert non-ethnocentric name here] to confirm the date of the shipment. How many kilos again?
    Gangster 2. NO! Shh! Keep your voice down until you dial out — that thing could be bugged.
    Phone. "This phone is not being used as a covert surveillance device. Please continue to arrange your morally and/or legally questionable activities as normal."
    Gangster 1. Muh?!
    Phone. "Please ignore this message."

  23. What about bugging computers? by danceswithtrees · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Given that computers are everywhere, I am starting to worry about computers being bugged (let me adjust my foil hat here). Keyloggers, rootkits, and worms are often mentioned but we seldom worry about them when we are not actually using the computers- they have become part of the office and home environment.

    All current laptops have microphones and some have built in cameras. Desktops also usually have microphones and often have cameras. Many have continuous internet access. Computers are ubiquitous and they are often left on. It is not hard to imagine infecting a vulnerable computer with a small program to send back continuous audio and an occasional picture. With reasonable bit rates and good encoding, it would not use much bandwidth.

    Does anyone else worry about such things? Has this been done already? If it has, would you know about it? (pull foil hat on tighter)

    1. Re:What about bugging computers? by rbanffy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just to remind you Microsoft has the power to install just about any software in your computer with the automatic Windows Update method. To give a different set of "updates" to a given IP address would be trivial.

      If we are talking Windows Genuine, then, delivering something to a specific Windows registration code should be trivial.

    2. Re:What about bugging computers? by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      A simple firewall would solve that problem, though the paranoid I guess would wonder if their firewall was bugged as well.

    3. Re:What about bugging computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are functions in the Windows API to manipulate the firewalling functionality of the box in question. It's possible for malware to muck with it as a result.

    4. Re:What about bugging computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are RATs (Remote Access Trojans) that can do this. For a while, there was a website of funny pictures taken through the webcams of compromised machines (the "Hey, you've got a hot girl sitting on your bed, why are are you sitting at your computer like a goon?" picture that made its rounds a couple of years ago.)

      Personally, I keep my webcam and mic physically disconnected unless they're in use, for this very reason. Especially if they're in a home office and you talk about NDA/sensitive material over your office phone.

    5. Re:What about bugging computers? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Just to remind you Microsoft has the power to install just about any software
      > in your computer with the automatic Windows Update method.

      Speak for yourself.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    6. Re:What about bugging computers? by tomjen · · Score: 1

      That is true - but if I was that paranoid, I would use another box as the firewall. And I would properly have it dump all the trafic to the harddisk for later analys.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    7. Re:What about bugging computers? by Antony.S · · Score: 1

      I don't think he meant a Windows software firewall installed on the machine itself.

  24. I'll try to record the conversations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The first time it happened, I did what you were saying and write it off to chance. That was after 8 of these odd conversations in the first 2 months, by about the 5th I noticed they all were trying to talk me round into giving my name, so I was really angry when my wife answered my phone and gave my name.
    After that it has so far been 10 months of no wrong calls.

    I asked her why she told a total stranger my full name, and she said it was the way he persisted in talking, the conversation naturally led to a point where my full name was the gap in the conversation.

    Then when *she* got a prepay and it started with her, the very first call she got was in front of me, she said you have a wrong number and when he didn't hang up the penny dropped. I signaled to her remind her about the previous time she'd handed out my name.

    I put my head up to listen in, and it is totally clear to me that he was trying to talk her into revealing information. If her phone supports recording, I'll try and record some of these calls and put them up on the web so you can hear for yourself. She's had 10 so far in her first 2 months of having the phone.

    I also have a phone for work calls only, but I signed a service contract when I bought it and haven't made any international calls on it, it's never had a wrong number in the 12 months I've had it.

    1. Re:I'll try to record the conversations by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      What country are you in?

    2. Re:I'll try to record the conversations by alienw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      God, are you people retarded? You are a telemarketer's wet dream. Why not just hang up immediately after telling someone it's a wrong number? What's the point of carrying on a conversation?

    3. Re:I'll try to record the conversations by SirMeliot · · Score: 1

      It really irrtates telemarketers when you talk to them. Think about it. If every 'no sale' call hangs up immediately they can get through hundreds each day. What you should do is use their own tactics against them. They want you to stay on the line while they make their pitch. Don't let them. Be polite, keep them talking about anything and everything. When they give in and try to close the call just keep it going. Simple human nature means its hard for them to simply hang up on you when you're being so nice. Or if you're lazy. When they ask for Mr Whoever ask them to wait while you go fetch him, leave the phone and go and have a nice sit down.

    4. Re:I'll try to record the conversations by Ariven · · Score: 5, Funny

      thats why you need to keep the telemarketer counter script handy... http://www.xs4all.nl/~egbg/counterscript.html

    5. Re:I'll try to record the conversations by SQLGuru · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's really simple:

      1. Start a pre-paid phone company.
      2. With each new activation, call the new user 10 to 12 times making each call last at least 5 minutes.
      3. User is forced to buy more minutes for the phone.
      4. Profit!

      Layne

    6. Re:I'll try to record the conversations by GuyWithLag · · Score: 1

      Not in most parts of Europe, as here the caller pays everything. Most companies have introduced contract terminations if you don't call from your phone once in six months...

    7. Re:I'll try to record the conversations by Romwell · · Score: 1

      WOW! That's hilarious. I'll definitely try it next time I get a call from them !

    8. Re:I'll try to record the conversations by james_orr · · Score: 1

      I really don't get many calls from telemarketers, I do get calls from telephone interviewers doing surveys, and I have no problem doing that. I had one about health care providers yesterday actually, I don't remember the last time a telemarketer called.

      Also, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act prohibits dialing a cellphone with an auto-dialer or pre-recorded message. Which is why my land line rang 5 times a day in the weeks before the election and my cell phone didn't get a single political call.

  25. Is there any evidence? by dabadab · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is there any evidence that such features are implemented in (GSM) phones? Because to me it looks more like an urban legend than anything else. Such a feature should have to have some traces: like being part of the GSM specifications, for one. Also, programmers working on cell phones should also be aware of such functionality (when I was working on conventional telephone switches I had - not too deep, since I was uninterested - knowledge of the wiretapping features).
    But, it seems, all this craze comes from some over-paranoid tinhats and has no grounding in reality.

    --
    Real life is overrated.
    1. Re:Is there any evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only some of the programmers need to be aware of LI ("lawful" intercept) capability in mobile handsets - only the ones working on the GSM protocol and media control layers. In many systems-on-a-chip (SoCs), this software is provided by the chip maker without source code avaialble.

      The capability to turn any phone into a bug is real. Not only is it real, it is a requirement in the standards documents, along with the ability to control this "feature" without the telco's knowledge from an LI console at the authorities' offices. Note that Nextel denied any knowledge of the bugging. Had they known about it, the system would not be working as specified.

      Cryptome.org has archives of LI specifications that have leaked. It would be safe to say other bugging capabilities, especially on 3G phones, have not yet leaked.

      Not only is it as bad as recent articles say it is - you have a live mic in your house that can be turned on at any time - it is worse. It's difficult to be paranoid when reality is so bad.

  26. Easy one-step algorithm by martinde · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Have you done anything to warrant surveillance from the FBI?
    Yes) Consider it bugged
    No) Why would they bother?

    1/2 :-) goes here, but more like 3/4 of a :-(

  27. Should have been titled by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    How to tell if you're a paranoid loony. Yes, Lauren, the government is /very/ interested in what you talk about when you're sitting on the loo.

    Honestly...

  28. This article is a sham by locksmith101 · · Score: 1

    The article tell you absolutly nothing about How To Tell If Your Cell Phone Is Bugged

    1. Re:This article is a sham by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. The way your phone is tapped is more interesting - and completely transparent, if done by your service provider. They can simply send a service SMS, coding the phone to forward everything it does to another "number". You'll never know what happened. If something goes wrong, you may get an alert that a call is being forwarded, but nothing else. And that message you can reset.

      More interestingly: There is no protection against fake service SMS'es. The originating domain is not checked by the GSM standard. But of course, if the forwarding is not an "official" secret, you'll start noticing weirdess on phone-bill by and by.

    2. Re:This article is a sham by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell would your service provider, who controls the switching end of the operation, send an SMS message to your phone in order to try to redirect calls? Aside from being completely unnecessary, SMS messages can't redirect calls in that way anyway.

  29. Real columbian businessmen, or Dlords.... by cheekyboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Use their own designed encrypted systems, or buy $5000 comms talkies from the russians.

    They use high tech RF mapping signature maps to see where there are dark spots
    in the FBis monitoring systems.

    If your making billions in profit each year, you can afford to spend $5-10m in custom design hardware from china
    or fly 1000s of flights to map the intercepts.

    Only part time low lifes use mobiles, because they cannot afford anything greater than $200USD, which means they must
    be very small time crooks.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:Real columbian businessmen, or Dlords.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i rememebr reading about how columbian drug lords had been actually purchasing IBM mainframes to run custom software to do things like statistical analysis of transport routes/intercepts etc. to detect "coincidences" that suggested there were moles/informants etc.; this was when the DEA agents trying to track them were using 1970s-era computers and filing actual paper. it's true, the proper, full-on criminal underworld is FAR more sophisticated than most people give them credit for.

    2. Re:Real columbian businessmen, or Dlords.... by radtea · · Score: 1

      They use high tech RF mapping signature maps to see where there are dark spots
      in the FBis monitoring systems.


      A lot of what I see on the topic of bugging and bug detection seems implausible, and this is one of those implausible things. How does one detect a monitoring system? Receivers are passive and potentially quite far away. So what is the actual process you are claiming makes it possible to detect what areas are not being monitored? I don't know what "high tech RF mapping signature maps" means, although I'm familiar with all the words and have actually designed moderately high frequency boards.

      There are a lot of clever tricks out there, and I freely admit my ignorance, but really, a great deal of what is being talked about here sounds like magic, and some pointers to detailed technical explanations of how these things are done would be much appreciated.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    3. Re:Real columbian businessmen, or Dlords.... by inKubus · · Score: 1

      It's called corporate America, the biggest criminals of them all. They are so advanced, they don't break laws; they fly between them.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    4. Re:Real columbian businessmen, or Dlords.... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      i rememebr reading about how columbian drug lords had been actually purchasing IBM mainframes to run custom software to do things like statistical analysis of transport routes/intercepts etc.

      Not to mention that they contracted ex-Russian naval engineers to build them a submarine for trafficking drugs. The hull was something like 50% complete when the police and army raided the construction.

      -b.

    5. Re:Real columbian businessmen, or Dlords.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading such an article too.. and their militia had sophisticated weaponry and night-vision compared to the underpaid local military. Also that they were hiring hackers for their mainframes. Where do I apply?

  30. buzzing razor mobile by towaz · · Score: 1

    I did have a friend who was worried he was being bugged by his mobile, it seems to made a buzzing noise from the speaker, I checked mine and it appears to do the same thing so probably nothing to worry about.

    I'm far too boring to be bugged anyway. ;)

    Anyone else have a razor that buzzes all the time?

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
    1. Re:buzzing razor mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      almost any phone will make some buzzing sounds on unshielded speakers. If you hear simple short pulsing, it's usually just contacting the tower for sms,voice mail, etc, and checking QoS. if it starts pulsing then buzzing continuously..you have an incoming call...so be prepared for the phone to ring in a second or two.

    2. Re:buzzing razor mobile by ShadoHawk · · Score: 0

      I usually turn mine off when I am done shaving.

    3. Re:buzzing razor mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea...mine buzzes when im in a call...

    4. Re:buzzing razor mobile by dafing · · Score: 1
      Nobodies mentioned this, Im a little angry, its very easy to answer!

      The Razr has an EL light keyboard, it buzzes when the light is on, thats the inverter for the light, its like how florescent lights make a buzz noise too! It will always do it when the light is on, dont worry its perfectly fine.

      --
      --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  31. It's not magic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like just another ploy of the Technocracy to keep the Virtual Adepts down.

  32. "virtually fullproof" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His place is "virtually fullproof". He's got the feds there. Yutz.

  33. I have the ultimate protection against snoopers... by The+Famous+Druid · · Score: 2, Funny

    My life is so boring, spying on me is its own punishment.

    --
    Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur (anything said in Latin sounds important)
  34. I think it's call log profiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Nice conspiracy theory, but you do realize that you're identifiable without your cooperation if you have a cellphone, don't you?"

    I don't think they are interested in me or my wife, (not that they know she's my wife). I think they are profiling all telephone calls for patterns of interconnection.

    We both make international calls to the far east, and I think we score highly on some equation in a computer somewhere. International calls from prepay phones in foreign languages where the phones were paid for in cash and the extended guarantee wasn't accepted and the top up cards are all paid for with cash.

    If you only know us from our mobile phone logs we must look very suspicious if you were a spy agency involved in call profiling.

    1. Re:I think it's call log profiling by djmurdoch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to mention all those AC posts they see you making...

    2. Re:I think it's call log profiling by speculatrix · · Score: 3, Funny

      make international calls to the far east,

      Osama, is that you?

    3. Re:I think it's call log profiling by j_snare · · Score: 3, Funny

      Osama, is that you?

      No, it's Mark. Get it right.

    4. Re:I think it's call log profiling by Da_Weasel · · Score: 1

      Osama, is that you?

      No, it's Mark. Get it right. I'm sorry...you have the wrong number...
      --
      If you must!
    5. Re:I think it's call log profiling by BlueYoshi · · Score: 1

      So that's how you hope to visit exotic places for free!

      --
      "Use cases are fairy tales..." I. S. 2005
  35. Risks by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

    In theory in the USA they need a warent to listen in on your phone (I live in Israel, I have no idea what the local laws are). But to be honest if you are that worried about somone listening in on your phone then don't pass sensative information over the phone lines.

    Could someone listen in on my cell phone? Maybe I don't know. To be honest if they did most of what they are going to hear is my calling neighbors to arange a lift home after work or me talking to my wife about important things like does she want me to pick up something at the store. I don't think the local cops care enough about this type of thing to make listening in important (At least I can't figure why they would). If I was aranging drug deals I would not use my cell phone, or even my home phone.

    --
    Erlang Developer and podcaster
  36. If you're a real bad guy.. by xtal · · Score: 1

    You already have one of these: Optoelectronics Scout

    Now, if your communications were encrypted end-end with hard encryption with keys you control, this would be a moot point. Coming soon to a VOIP / programmable cell phone near you.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:If you're a real bad guy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waste of time - only detects signals 15db above background. Which indicates to me that it is analog based. (And a 15db threshold is pretty loud - it's the difference between a whisper and a shout. If that's all it can do, it's not very good even on analog signals)

      Digital signals have a "spread spectrum" character, ie. they are buried in the noise. eg. Digital TV is about 15db *under* the analog TV signal when it shares the same range. WiFi is also spread spectrum which is why you can use it unlicenced. Ditto cell phones.

      This is really a device for detecting old fashioned FM bugs

  37. Cells are never off..... by Zapotek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, this has come up a lot in many conversations.

    First off, cell phones have batteries internally, much like the battery your mobo has to keep it's settings.
    Why would cell phones differ? Take your main battery out, the time/alarm/etc settings are saved, doesn't that give you any clues?

    The phone is powered at any given time, it's not a matter of whether the screen is lit or not...

    They could, and can, and do, use cell phones as bugs, there's nothing new to that.

    1. Re:Cells are never off..... by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having enough juice to keep the clock ticking over is one thing, having enough to power a transmitter or recording circuit is a whole different level. I love my cell phone, it lives with me 24/7, do I worry that it is watching me? Nope. I'm an ex 'them' (I don't change my IMSI and IMEI regularly just for fun though)

    2. Re:Cells are never off..... by BLKMGK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm, cell phones get their time and date from the TOWERS not from an internal clock, this is how it adjusts when you move to another time zone. Magic huh? Settings are saved in the SIM or other non volatile memory location.

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    3. Re:Cells are never off..... by igb · · Score: 1
      Well, my previous Sony Ericsson phone did offer to change the timezone when I roamed, but my current Moto doesn't.

      ian

    4. Re:Cells are never off..... by AntiDragon · · Score: 1

      Well, my latest Nokia phone refuses to start up when the battery's too low yet it'll actually switch itself on long enough to blast my clock alarm sound at me. So whatever internal battery/reserve power it has, it's more than just enough to keep the clock ticking...

      --
      "...So I hung back and lurked. For 18 months. Can't beat a good old-fashioned lurking."
    5. Re:Cells are never off..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a cell phone powers off on its own, there is typically a true reserve of about 10% remaining, enough to keep the internal clock running (yes, cell phones do have an internal clock, they typically only acquire the time signal upon startup or when handing off between towers) and enough to trigger the alarm.

      Remove the battery completely and see if the alarm still triggers.

    6. Re:Cells are never off..... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Then how come I have to change the time on my phone every time a daylight savings transition occurs?

      One person I knew was complaining to me that every message she received arrived a day late. Turned out her date was set one day fast so the phone wasn't accepting any messages from 'the future'. Correcting the date fixed it immediately.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    7. Re:Cells are never off..... by AntiDragon · · Score: 1

      Nonono, I wasn't agreeing or disagreeing about the presence of additional batteries, but noting that if you think your battery is dry, it probably isn't. A point you've just backed up for me, thank you.

      --
      "...So I hung back and lurked. For 18 months. Can't beat a good old-fashioned lurking."
  38. Slow news day? by Marton · · Score: 1

    There's nothing in this "article" that the discussion related to the original bugging story did not already cover in much greater detail. No news is better than crappy news, slashdot.

  39. Not entirely reliable advice by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If we are concerned with the ability of somebody to alter the phone's behavior sufficiently to initiate a call without your intervention, then we shouldn't assume too much about what other things can or cannot be done.

    For example, not being able to make a call when a call is in progress. In time division multiplexing, you're taking one or two timeslots out of eight or sixteen. However, it's pretty clear that if we have modified the phone ostensible behavior enough to use it as a bug, it could also take more than one half channel at a time.

    Checking the warmth of the phone is good idea, but not perfect either. The assumption is that the phone is transmitting your words live. What if the phone recorded your conversations at a reduced bit rate, say 3kb/sec, using voice activiation. It could the be stored and dribbled out intermittently, particularly when close to a cell tower. This would reduce telltale power effects. This might not be enough to monitor your every waking moment, but it could be used to monitor snatches of your conversation, particularly as part of a surveillance program.

    Even if the phone doesn't transmit your speech, it could use the signally channel to record that you are talking, combined with the GPS or wi-fi snooping, over time the network of people you talk to could be recontructed.

    It's a bit paranoid to worry about these things, unless you think the government has a compelling reason to snoop on you. But if you do have such a reason, then you shouldn't make too many assumptions about what they could do with a phone, particularly a "smart" phone which might have megabytes of storage. A simpler phone with a removable battery would be a good choice.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Not entirely reliable advice by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately a simpler phone wont have the desired effect either. CCITT 7 is a pretty complex little beast, used not only by GSM these days, but is also replacing older dialing methods for regular land line phones as well. SS7 is common, much the same way air is common, over time it does provide a detailed map of an individuals network of contacts - many layers deep.

    2. Re:Not entirely reliable advice by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      And, because of an urgency to "hunt down an kill all dee terrists", I wouldn't be surprised if there soon will be government tax (or, coercive) incentives for carriers and phone retailers to stop stocking low-tech phones. Instead, roll out the latest, or a low-end with SOME of the best ram and silent remote-access features. As the networks upgrade, it becomes a drag to support the older and ancient phones, yet these are still on some nets.

      Just an idea...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  40. Phone Bugged? by tech_guru5182 · · Score: 1

    I know the article doesn't say what the subject suggests, but there is a simple solution to tell if it is being bugged live. Simply get one of those antennas that flash when the phone is transmitting. If it is flashing when the phone is "off" you know it is bugged. Just remember that phones normally will transmit about every 15 minutes to check in with the network.

    --
    BAN BPL! Keep the radio spectrum free fro
    1. Re:Phone Bugged? by wes33 · · Score: 1
      Just remember that phones normally will transmit about every 15 minutes to check in with the network.

      NOT when they are OFF - which is the point of the article.

      The question to be asked are: what models of cell phone (if any) cannot be really turned off? I'm quite sure my antique Nokia 3310 does not check with the network every 15 minutes (or EVER) when it is OFF. Otherwise, the batteries of a seldom used phone wouldn't last for months between charges.
    2. Re:Phone Bugged? by tech_guru5182 · · Score: 1

      I meant when they are on. If ever you would see the antenna flash with the phone "off", that would be a dead giveaway that the phone wasn't.

      --
      BAN BPL! Keep the radio spectrum free fro
  41. Hanlon's Razor by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Personally I wonder if it's not just a case of Hanlon's Razor: never attribute to malice, that which is adequately explained by stupidity. It could be that someone just wrote down the wrong phone number for someone named Mark, and your obstinacy to not give any detail tripped _their_ paranoia.

    I'm saying it because something similar happened on my normal (non-mobile) phone line. And the Deutsche Telekom certainly had all my data there, so there would have been no need for such a masquerade.

    Anyway, someone with an extra-thick arabic or maybe turkish accent repeatedly called, first to ask to talk to Achmed or something like that, then gradually after a few calls (spaced a couple of weeks apart) it turned into trying to bully me into "admitting" that I'm Achmed. (Dunno what gave him _that_ stupid idea.) And, yeah, demanding to know who I am, if not Achmed. By the time it turned into screaming at me in his weird language, I told him I'll call the police if he doesn't leave me alone.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Hanlon's Razor by jafac · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't you mean; Hanlon's RAZR?

      (In any case, this Hanlon fellow sounds like a big, gullible sucker. Scam artists thrive on people who attribute their malice to incompetence/stupidity.)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  42. The story is quite useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cell phones get warm when they are transmitting. This is actually a great topic starter for my first year Electrical Fundamentals class. Any device that uses energy gets warm. How warm? How much energy is going into heat? Is there an Ohm's Law equivalent for heat? Why does the battery get warm?

    (Similar question: How do you tell the difference between a black box voltage source and its current source equivalent? Answer: The internal resistance of the current source always dissipates heat when the source isn't short circuited. In other words, the current source will be warm.)

    Another topic starter: Speakers are linear; how do they demodulate RF energy so it can be heard? In other words, why can you hear cell phone induced noise in a speaker?

    You can run down the article if you wish but there's nothing wrong with the author's approach. I've known many brilliant and not so brilliant scientists and engineers and one thing stands out. The really brilliant people almost always notice the simple, obvious-after-the-fact stuff and the third rate hacks don't. In that regard the author of the story probably rates closer to the high end of the scale.

    1. Re:The story is quite useful by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
      Why does the battery get warm? Internal resistance.

      Speakers are linear; how do they demodulate RF energy so it can be heard? Assuming the signal is being imposed on the speaker leads, the demodulation occurs via the output driver transistors - they're either acting as diodes for the RF signal or the final amp's negative feedback circuit is amplifying it.

      Amateur radio operators are keenly aware of RFI issues.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  43. It can work (here in France at least) by rHBa · · Score: 1

    You don't have to buy the phone/sim card with a credit/debit card,
    you don't have to top it up with a credit/debit card, just buy top-up cards at the news agent/tobacconist,
    you can easily pretend you don't speak the language, I'm sure they'll hang up pretty quick if you start babbling in a foreign (made up?) language.

  44. Zing! by Legion303 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If your phone is warm to the touch even when not in use, is that an indication of bugging or a battery designed by Sony?

    1. Re:Zing! by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      Those are not mutually exclusive conditions!

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  45. Samuel Clemens Speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can I help you?

  46. The real answer to 'who are they'- Bill Collectors by rednip · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those callers are bill collectors. Mark was (and likely is) a deadbeat (not that there is anything wrong with that :]). By law, or convention (I'm not really sure) they don't talk about Mark's financial problem with anyone else but Mark. The next round of creditors will start automated messages "I have an important message for Mark (his last name), call...", and this will repeat 4 or more times a day. Get rid of that number now, it won't stop.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  47. On Star by coinreturn · · Score: 1

    A 2003 lawsuit revealed that the FBI was able to surreptitiously turn on the built-in microphones in automotive systems like General Motors' OnStar to snoop on passengers' conversations. When FBI agents remotely activated the system and were listening in, passengers in the vehicle could not tell that their conversations were being monitored.

    I missed this when it happened, but I always suspected as much. Imagine this...

    Driver: Hand me another brewski.
    Passenger: Here you go.
    ...Police cruiser shows up in rearview mirror.

    1. Re:On Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one would not have anything against that. Drunk driving kills.

    2. Re:On Star by CynicalTyler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I for one would not have anything against that. Drunk driving kills.

      I for one would not mind being killed by a drunk driver if it saved our right* to privacy and freedom of speech. No officer needs to hear what I'm saying to see that I'm swerving or chugging from a tall silver can at every stoplight.

      *: The word "right" in this context is used to convey that it is ethically and morally right that we should have privacy and freedom of speech, not that we have a guaranteed Right as established by government and upheld/squashed by the courts.

    3. Re:On Star by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually there was a problem with OnStar employees doing this to some famous people and or their ex for kicks.
      I am pretty sure that you can find kits on line that add an LED that lights up when you the mic is active or a switch that kills them mike

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  48. Look at the color of the wires by gr8dude · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is another approach - take off the cover which protects the battery. Underneath the battery, you will see how two wires are connected. If the color of the wires is green, then you're bugged. Otherwise, if the wires are red - it's a bomb.

    Other colors are not defined by the standards, so if your phone has wires which are not green, nor red - you have a counterfeit phone.

  49. Figure out which app it is and delete it. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can attribute every single crash/reset of my phone within the past six months to a year to particular apps on my phone. In this case, it's GNU Keyring. Keyring really likes to crash my phone if I haven't used Keyring in a while. It's Keyring's way of telling me it wants more love. :)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Figure out which app it is and delete it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, trying to turn on the 650 when I had the Phone app running (yes, the one included) would freeze my Treo more than half the time. I have no idea if it's Cingular or Palm's fault.

    2. Re:Figure out which app it is and delete it. by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      It's Keyring's way of telling me it wants more love. :)

      (obligatory slashdot rant) Well, Keyring is open source, so why don't you download the source code and give it more love yourself!

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    3. Re:Figure out which app it is and delete it. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      This is me you're talking about. I don't need Keyring crashing even more! :)

      (Actually, my version is slightly patched by me to fix issues with the Treo's 5-way navpad. The patches haven't been integrated into a release yet, or at least weren't a year or so ago and I haven't seen any updates to Keyring in a while.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  50. Easy way by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    is to see if it is getting warm, and is the little light (on some) blinking. I guess the really OBVIOUS way is to look at the display.

    1. Re:Easy way by Somegeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA. The newer phones can be programmed so that the display/activity lights do not give them away.

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
  51. Now that's sorta funny by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Insightful
    and if you're not from the United States, than imagine that I'm suggesting you include this in your Government's constitution/body of laws if it is not already there...


    You know, no offense meant, but it's sorta funny to hear that coming from the _USA_.

    What you have over there is some vague principle, that, as you say, is constantly being reinterpreted to mean, "yeah, well, it says we can't search your papers, but your computer's files are still fair game" or "yeah, well, once you gave that info to someone else, or it passed through someone else's servers/wires/whatever, then you have no more claim to privacy" or other such.

    What we have in the EU, on the other hand, are very precise laws saying what can you do with other people's data (very little without their consent), what you _can't_ do with it, and what kind of data you're not even supposed to be collecting at all. And not just for government agencies. Your bank or phone company also can't just sell your information to everyone for an extra buck, for example.

    So maybe, dunno, maybe you could include _that_ idea in your body of laws?
    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Now that's sorta funny by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So maybe, dunno, maybe you could include _that_ idea in your body of laws?



      Absolutely not.



      1. It's un-American (anything those Europeans do is by default).

      2. It could hurt the economy.

      3. It most definitely helps the terrorists.

      4. Since when did the US ever take advice from backwater countries in the middle of nowhere ?

    2. Re:Now that's sorta funny by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you also have EuroDisney, and that pretty much invalidates everything else...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  52. Paranoid by brother+bloat · · Score: 1

    While this is an interesting article, I have a problem with several of the indicated "clues that your phone is bugged." First, as the author points out, short-lasting batteries in the vast majority of cases, also as the author points out, simply means either (1) the battery is old and should be replaced, since it is having trouble holding a charge or (2) the battery life indicator on your phone is malfunctioning. Second, an unexpectedly warm phone, particularly when you're in an area where the reception is weak, could simply mean that the phone is continuously searching for a signal. To reduce the overheating and increase battery life, most cell phone services have a number you can dial to update your phone's repository of cell phone towers. Third, when the phone is transmitting or receiving information while you're not making a call, in the vast majority of cases, it's going to be either (1) syncing with the time server to keep your phone's clock accurate, (2) updating cell tower information, (3) updating some other bit of information (weather, stock quotes) continuosly displayed on your phone, or (4) you are currently receiving or sending a text message. The author points out that the vast majority of phones are not bugged, so none of the criterion mentioned in the article are "strong" indicators of bugging, and since the criterion mentioned are not independent, observing all symptoms does not indicate stronger evidence.

    --
    (( (CRAYON) )) >
  53. put the cell phone near an old CRT monitor... by master_p · · Score: 1

    ...and the instant the phone starts communication, the CRT image will be affected. It's a bulletproof way to detect communication.

    1. Re:put the cell phone near an old CRT monitor... by Cheeze · · Score: 1

      unless the phone is searching for a network, or downloading your e-mail, or anything else that uses the network.

      You can also get them close to a baby monitor. You can then hear each packet or stream of packets.

      --
      Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
  54. How to tell by thaig · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just phone your own land-line and then say, "Binladenbinladenbinladen" 10 times.

    Wait 30 minutes.

    If there are no black helicopters after 30 minutes then you probably aren't being bugged.

    --
    This is all just my personal opinion.
  55. Well yea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When we were in Crawford, Texas, both my, and my friend's phones were 'malfunctioning'. Some mess about the network being unavaliable. I took the battery out of mine... Well... because I'm just paranoid like that, my friend didn't. Ultimately, he had to buy a new phone when we left because his old one just wouldn't turn on anymore after the battery died. Also... Mine phone is prepay, and I pay with cash... It's actually cheaper than other subscriber calling plans, no long distance, etc... For the record... We both were using Tmobile and the same model phone... Just one of those cheap silver Nokias...

    But yea... anyone who thinks the feds can't and doesn't do this is just plain ignorant.

  56. I don't think you've been paying attention... by BrainBarker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You should assume that your cell phone is bugged, at least in the sense that the "proper authorities" have access to any conversations you've had and where you were at the time. Maybe they're not always paying attention, but they can always listen if they choose.

    Perhaps I'm wrong, just being paranoid, but I'd say it's utterly foolish to assume you have any privacy by default these days. If you're not taking active measures to ensure privacy, you don't have it.

    - Brain.

    --
    "Dance like it hurts. Love like you need money. Work when people are watching." - Dogbert.
    1. Re:I don't think you've been paying attention... by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Prepaid cell phones + cash + fake name + new phone all the time = good luck getting a wiretap.

      Drug dealers have been doing this for awhile now.

      --
      What?
  57. How to know if you're bugged by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    Look yourself in the mirror. If you look like this, there's a great chance you're bugged.

  58. Remote operation of mobile device cameras? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've considered this possibility for a while, but with the twist that the camera could remotely be set to a capture mode and images transmitted via the cell/data network. Anyone know how feasible this aspect would be?

  59. Ghost Phones by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

    You can buy them fairly cheaply. The are known as "Ghost Phones". They normally seem to be a software hacked version of an early 2000s mobile that looks a bit out of place among the modern fancy phones. You can probably get more modern versions too though.

  60. Umm, those were rhetorical questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question

    Those were questions, arising from the article, that could be used to promote discussion and thought in first year engineering students.

  61. Re:The real answer to 'who are they'- Bill Collect by binarytoaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They're not necessarily bill collectors.

    I'm currently stationed overseas, and I got into a car accident while on leave in the States. The other party decided to sue for damages (I love living in America) and my insurance company played the "he's overseas serving the country, are you honestly going to force him to come back to deal with this?" card, the judge agreed, and delayed the trial until my tour's up, which at the time was more than two years.

    My wife has been getting calls on her cell phone (she's still in the states) that go like this:

    "Is binarytoaster there?" "...No, he's overseas." *click*

    It's honestly that fast from the way she puts it - they just ask if I'm there, and upon getting that answer they just hang up. Never say who they are, never leave a number, nothing. Been going on for at least a few months now.

    She was completely confused by why anyone would do this, as was I, until I remembered the lawsuit. So they might not be collectors, but they're still just as annoying.

  62. Re:Well, I guess by leon.gandalf · · Score: 1, Funny

    The what now? I love it when people talk about mythical non existant things..... Liberal Media... what next Unicorns!!?!?!

  63. Re:The real answer to 'who are they'- Bill Collect by Chaset · · Score: 1

    Yeah, ditto comment. When I moved into my new place 2 years ago and got a land line, someone kept calling for "Natasha". I tried hanging up, I tried calling back the number they gave, I even said "yes" (or pressed 2 for "yes") and took the (computerized) message. It never stopped. I moved out of that place and no longer have the same number, but I bet they're still calling the poor chump who got that number after me.

    --
    -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
  64. Foil Proof Plan by jbuck · · Score: 1

    I fashioned a fancy tin foil holster for my phone. I just keep it wrapped in tin foil when I'm not using it. Problem is, I used the tin foil from my hat to make it...

    --
    -whoa, I'm jones'ing for a sig right about now...
  65. Other concerns... by Uberwangen · · Score: 1

    People do have to worry about their own cell phones being bugged, but there is also another concern of using cell phones as bugs. These are called ghost phones. How they work is that when they are called, they simply pick up without ringing and operates as a normal cell phone, letting the caller listen to whatever is going on in the vicinity. These are relatively easy to make, as you can purchase phones from Ebay and then all it takes is a little bit of soldering to turn a standard phone into a ghost phone.

  66. I'm not buying one word of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to know a guy who designed and built phones. He stated that NOBODY was allowed to build a phone unless it had 2 communications chips (one that you use for calls and one the government can turn on remotely anytime they want). This is apparently FCC law and there's no getting around it. So I suppose the only way I can be sure of this is to build my own phone and try to get someone to activate it. Who here actually thinks any carrier would activate a phone YOU built that doesn't have the spy chip?

  67. Don't bother - One time pad is the way to go by sammyo · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you're really worried, get a hex die from a gaming store. Then get
    8-16 *different* friends to each buy you a prepaid phone. Number them.
    When you need to make a call, roll the die, use the phone, toss it in
    the trash or better, give it to a random teenager to use up the minutes.

  68. Can anyone tell me... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    ...if these LED flashy things interfere with reception? I mean, if they draw energy from surrounding radiation, surely that must dull the signal somewhat.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  69. The static. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once mentioned to a friend over the phone that I was watching a TV show about Echelon and my phone went all staticy for a second. Thats how I know if I'm being bugged. :)

  70. Or your car stereo by bigtrike · · Score: 1

    This will also work with most car stereos if the phone is placed close enough

  71. What about other devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA: "But if your battery seems to be running out of juice far too early (despite what the battery status display might claim), that might be an indication that your phone is being used to transmit behind your back (or it might be a worn out battery and a typically inaccurate battery status display)."

    Looks like my iPod mini has been talking to the Feds too!

  72. *boggle* by Akardam · · Score: 3, Informative

    What, did you sleep through elementary physics and the principles of EM radiation?

    A cell phone is nothing more than a fancy radio with an omnidirectional antenna. That antenna, per its name, is going to radiate a certian amount of RF energy in all directions. RF that is radiated in the direction of the cell tower will be recieved by the antennas on the tower. RF that is radiated in any other direction will gradually be absorbed by the surrounding environment to no practical effect. So if your LED RF detector happens to be in the close vicinity of your cell phone when the phone is transmitting, it's going to be hit with RF that wouldn't have hit the cell tower anyway!

    The only possibly conceivable way that the LED RF detector could have any impact on the signal strength between the cell phone and the cell tower is if it was exactly in the path between the cell phone antenna and the cell tower antenna. The probability that this would occur is so small as to be trivial, and with the wide angle of radiation on most cell phone tower antennas, and the fact that there is usually more than one antenna for any direction, reduces the probability effectively to zero.

    1. Re:*boggle* by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, radio does not behave like that.

      The GSM radio wavelength is about 30cm which means that in effect all objects which affect the radio path, including the transmitter and LED receiver, are "blurry" in space to the scale of 30cm (this is an order of magnitude, not an exact value). The phone itself, and the distance from the LEDs, are much smaller than that. So the directionality of the radiation is nearly irrelevant to calculating how much is absorbed and transmitted.

      In other words, contrary to the parent post, the LEDs attached to the phone will be effectively on the radio path to the base station, no matter where they are attached on the phone.

      It's counterintuitive that you can have a radio signal between two small antennae at A and B, and something that's nearly in between but off by say 10cm affecting the signal between A and B, is though attracting the energy towards it (even bending the beam is possible). But that is exactly what happens. Waves are like that.

      It's more complicated than that, however, because the LEDs are also in the "near field" - the region where there may be a non-radiating component to the oscillating EM field around the phone transmitter. In this region, the LEDs could, if they are constructed to do so, absorb energy from the near field, and, depending very much on the phone design, potentially do it without affecting the radiated signal.

      Also, it is possible that they absorb some of the radiated energy but if they use very little power, not affect it very much.

      So we can't easily say what effect the LEDs will have on the transmitted signal, but the parent's argument about having to be "exactly on the path" to the transmitter, as in a straight line, is not correct.

      -- Jamie

    2. Re:*boggle* by skuzz03 · · Score: 1

      Near-field radio absorption will be less affected by a little dangling LED toy than it would a human skull full of soft tissue.

      Also, as your assumptions are incorrect, microwave radiation's focus is primarily in a line-of-sight fashion although the omni antennas diffuse this outward to maximize reception in handsets.

      I don't disagree that a device in close proximity to a wireless handset and/or within near-field could cause the handset to crank up it's transmitter power, such as a faraday cage, bucket of water or other signal-absorption device, but assuming any negligible amount of radio energy is being "sucked" away by these self-contained button battery powered LED sensors is lacking in factual proof other than some crazy hearsay. (The ones I am thinking of are these little goofy things that look like jewelry beads and are designed to hang from your antenna or from a lanyard on your phone, direct contact isn't even necessary, just a few inches of proximity.)

      In an unofficial study of my own as I was curious at the time when one of my friends had one of these, with and without one of these devices under normal handset use, battery life differences were nil.

      These devices are essentially passive collectors that detect RF energy in a specific frequency range in the magnitude of a few mW of output power and up. I've seen a CDMA handset with a maximum power output of 200mW sets off these keyfobs when the transceiver is running at just 5-10mW. For how they work, think of a toy boat in a pond when someone throws a 20 lb rock in. The ripples caused by the rock make the boat bob, that bobbing is our indicator that the water is moving. The ripple in the direct path of the boat would be affected by the boat's presence, but if you watch the rest of the ripple in the other 359.9 around where the rock landed, you'll notice the waves continue to behave the same. If you throw in a smaller rock, the boat will bob less, but as long as the tolerance of the sensor is set as such, it'll still activate the blinking LED.

      Coupling this with all the other interference factors such as multipath fading (which technologies such as CDMA can use to their advantage with the use of rake receivers), doppler shift, and signal absorption, scattering or reflection due to glass, metal, leaves on trees, et. al., and you'll realize the little tiny keyfob LED makes little impact on a wireless handset's operations.

    3. Re:*boggle* by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      Also, as your assumptions are incorrect, microwave radiation's focus is primarily in a line-of-sight fashion although the omni antennas diffuse this outward to maximize reception in handsets.

      All EM radiation is line of sight for a sufficiently wide beamwidth and sufficiently wide obstacles. :)

      We characterise 30cm microwave radiation as "line-of-sight" for practical transmission because 30cm is small compared with buildings, trees, walls, windows, doors, and other typical obstacles in the environment.

      Compare with, say, AM radio which has wavelengths up to 2km at the extreme. Such long waves are barely affected by individual buildings and trees (unless you're inside a conductive building) because of the scale difference - effectively, those waves travel around building-sized obstacles, but are blocked by large structures such as mountains. So we don't describe AM radio as line-of-sight for that reason. (But if you have a space probe and the moon gets in the way, those transmissions are line-of-sight at that scale. It's all relative).

      But it is not accurate to think of 30cm microwaves as "line-of-sight" at the scale of a few centimetres - the distance from the cellphone antenna to the LEDs.

      A cellphone antenna is omnidirectional largely because you cannot emit a narrow, highly directional beam of 30cm waves from an antenna that fits inside a cellphone.

      With current signal processing abilities, if it were possible to emit a highly directional beam (or the equivalent when you take into account multipaths from reflections etc.; that doesn't affect this argument, it just generalises the maths) that would be a huge improvement in spectrum usage, because many phones could use the same frequencies concurrently in the same cell. Just imagine a pencil beam from the base station to each handset - they'd each have a private channel and there would be no interference. But it's not possible because of the physics and the size of handsets relative to the wavelength. It is possible at the base station only, and that's the reason base stations have many antennae pointing in different directions.

      It is possible with larger transcievers - and it is done now by MIMO transcievers appearing in current wireless access points - but you'll notice they have at least two antennae, spaced apart (which is essential), and also the wavelength is smaller (about 10cm or 5cm).

      (It is actually possible to produce a highly directional beam when several small transcievers cooperate. Through cooperation it is also possible to get a similar increase in data rate for each transciever, as if each one had a directional connection to the base station - a technique I call "distributed lensing". But currently available kit doesn't do that, as far as I know. I'm sure it will, it's the obvious next step after MIMO.)

      Back to the point...

      On the question of amount of power absorbed: I think we can safely say the power absorbed by the LEDs is, well, the amount of power needed to light a modern blinking LED. Which, as you say, is a few mW at most. :)

      On the analogy with a boat: you need large waves (which you don't get from a throwable rock) from an emitter smaller than the waves (say, a vertical pipe with outlet just below the water surface, pumping water in and out), and a tiny boat that _doesn't_ bob freely; it must be anchored with a tuned, damped spring to make a good energy absorber.

      (And if you really meant 359.9 degrees not blocked by the boat, the boat is really far away from the emitter.)

      But you make a good point anyway ;) Only a fraction of the energy of the circular wave will be absorbed even if the boat is a perfect absorber, because as you note most of the wave energy goes elsewhere.

      In the case of large waves from a small transmitter and a good but small absorber close to the transmitter, that is still true: there's a maximum amount which can be absorbed by a perfect absorber, and yes i

    4. Re:*boggle* by cbacba · · Score: 1

      Sometimes things are described a bit too simply. Radio antennas dont exist in a vaccuum. If there is a device, like a blinky light thingy, it's coupled to the antenna sufficiently to be absorbing energy. As such, it is possibly changing the antenna pattern or possibly the amount of energy actually being radiated. (this coupling is probably magnetic - a transformer so to say).

      The net results may be that the cell phone is having to expend more battery power to properly hit the towers or in more remote locations could be the difference between establishing a comm link or not. Clearly, the blinky thingy is absorbing rf energy in order to blink and emit light.

      As for the whole story, it's yet another leak that eliminates one more method of catching the moderately stupid bad guys, in this case, mafia types of criminals. Anyone wondering why we ain't caught ben laden only has to go back to the new york times archives to find that they leaked our primary tracking mechanism to the world at large - and - evidently at least one ben laden follower appears to read the NYT also.

      As for the paranoid schizos out there worried about big bro, maybe because you gotta joint in your pocket or some other high crime, your vanity and conceit is getting the best of you, because you ain't worth wasting scarce law enforcement/national security resources on you, even if buying that weed is funding organized crime and even foreign terrorist organizations.

  73. Just because you're paranoid... by joeyblades · · Score: 1
    In the immortal words of Yossarian:
    "Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not out to get you."
    The author writes:
    From a transmitting standpoint, they are either on or off...
    Too true. Since a cell phone is essentially useless if it's turned off, then I propose you replace your cell phone with a quarter so you can use public phones and not worry about big brother. The nice thing about a quarter is it weighs a lot less than a cell phone and the batteries never go dead. Just make sure that you don't have one of those quarters that is really a listening device!!!
  74. This is retarded by bastardblaster · · Score: 1

    A bunch of fluff to make people paranoid. I work for one of these trackers. You want to know if you're being tracked? Check you damn bill or call your damn cell carrier. If it's your phone, it can't be tracked without your consent, so if you find/think you are being tracked, you're probably also the one paying for it, and therefore it's pretty easy to find out if they've done this without resorting to seeing if your phone is warm.

  75. Re:The real answer to 'who are they'- Bill Collect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you act too sketchy then the bill collector type of calls will never stop. Simply tell them "I'm sorry you have the wrong number, this is [made up name]." They will chalk it up as a genuine wrong number and stop calling after a few attempts.

    On a side note, this also works on bill collectors who are actually looking for you and in fact have the right number.

  76. *My* cell phone?! by CynicalTyler · · Score: 1

    Hm, and all this time I thought it was other people's cell phones that were bugging me. I never even stopped to think it could be my own. Thanks Slashdot!

  77. My experience - They're more advanced... by Hollinger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah, but some aren't. I had an interesting run in with some credit card scammers earlier this year. I got a call from my credit card company about 10 minutes after I bought lunch one day. It was from the fraud early warning system, which I'd gotten a few times now. These were usually due to me flying around the country, or taking extended road trips, or making very large purchases ($900 in appliances, $1500 in furniture, etc.). I wasn't too worried about it.

    This time, though, I it asked if I could verify a purchase for "theme park tickets," "appliances," and some other things. I told it no, and an amazingly easy 15 minutes later, my account was frozen, all the obvious charges were rolled back, and a new card was on the way, along with some paperwork for me to flag other charges that the CC company missed.

    The scammers had my old address apparently. I knew this because they tried to order a convection oven (who'd have figured?) and have it shipped to my old address. My guess is that this is the address in whatever database that got cracked. When I did get my next statement, I noticed a few charges to some random "music store" .com that was based in the same state as this old address, and donations to a charity of a few cents.

    It turns out that credit card company had cancelled far more of these "song" purchases, and "donations." The thieves had made, over a few weeks, donations of varying amounts from a few cents to about $2, and random song purchases of about $1. It seems that they were trying to establish that I was "normally" spending money in the area where I used to live, and also verifying that my card was still legit.

    So yeah, some criminals are dumb. Others are not. The fraud detection systems we have are pretty good though.

    1. Re:My experience - They're more advanced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the penny charges are a standard way to find out if you are watching your account. Since you didn't notice them at first they proceeded to try and get your cash.

      Perhaps the places they bought expensive stuff are known to refund credit card purchases in cash?

  78. Inaccuracy by rbrome · · Score: 2, Informative

    One correction to the article: WCDMA definitely is used as a primary voice channel. It's not data-only like EVDO technology. That's why WCDMA phone specs often have separate talk times listed for GSM vs. WCDMA modes.

  79. Re:Old, old news.. I might be bugged... by davidsyes · · Score: 2

    I for a number of months heard computer speakers popping and buzzing away, even if no one was in the nearby cube. I suppose someone COULD have left their phone in the cube while at lunch or a meeting, but... now I am wondering if it was MY phone. Might not have been. But, for shits and giggles, I sometimes just turn off my phone, or leave it "somewhere" for a few hours, then retrieve it.

    What's REALLY weird, is during November, on no fewer than THREE outbound calls, I got cross-connected with OTHER people who were NOT even IN my contact list, and were NOT the people I was trying to reach. One acted like she was already talking to someone as if in another conversation. Another I think didn't quite want to hang up, either. Then, I've gotten the "wrong number" call where they caller asked for "Mo", and despite my saying I'm not "Mo", he didn't want to hang up. My friend standing next to me noted my time with this caller and then told me "You're very nice, patient...I would have just hung up..." Truth is, if I could reach through the phone, I'd probably tear the jaw off that caller, even if it were an agent just doing his/her job. Or, euphemistically, I'd deal with that situation.

    (I could also go on about my website having been experiencing WEIRD stuff, like my updates not going through, the server crashing on the ISP side (I asked them, "Don't you have fail-overs or redundancy to cover this stuff?" The rep didn't answer. Thing is, I don't know about outtages of my site when I'm NOT on my site, but at least 3 times over the past few months, my site croaked while I was updating pages. Not doing anything special. Just using THE (major Host)-provided tool, just text, a few pics and some flash-based image presenters... And, on my log stats, there are sometimes more "unresolved IP" sites than normal IPs/geography. Some are from overseas as I expect/presume, but some go to the US east coast, and have weird names, making me think a front company for some agency is periodically checking my site. Go ahead. look all you want. I wish I had friends all over the world and could reach them anonymously; I could have them report to me their successes and failures to see my site to once and for all put my mind at rest over possible disruptions and plain old blocking of my site. http://www.otanashide.com/ is one of them. I suppose some bastard will try to throw the 2006 military commissions act against me, retroactively...)

    I also, notice that my inbound calls' timestamps are set for the east coast. I called my carrier and the CSR told me I had to go to a landline phone, call them, then he would give me a sequence of codes to reset the phone. I told him I don't HAVE a landline phone, and that he could help me by giving me the sequence. He said he couldn't do that. He suggested I go to the local authorized retailer and have them punch the code into my keypad.

    Sheesh.

    Then, there are times when I have had my phone turned off, and not just by my OWN hand. When I turn it on, it tells me "Updating Contacts". This is MetroPCS, for shit's sake. It's a cheap, lousy, S14 from 2004, and they can "update" my contact list? Hell, I've for some time been thinking they or some agency is lifting my contacts. Fine, go ahead. But when/IF I enter a contact "bomb local FBI office" I'm SURE they'll REALLY up the ante, like knock down my door, confiscate my shit, and ship me off to Guantanamo. Could probably happen to ANYONE, if you become a person of interest. Might be safer to just stick with "Fuck you through and through" as a contact name...

    Yep, my phone mysteriously and occasionally TURNS ITSELF OFF, even when the battery is fully charged. I COULD be a bad battery, as only one of the two regularly does it, but I think they both will or have. So, I suspect someone is trying to test whether I am monitoring my phone, or maybe trying to reinitialize some soft-feature in the phone. Maybe I'll just give up cell phones all together. Could save me $55 per month, anyway.

    When

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  80. Lauren ..... His ..... WTF ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lauren ..... His ..... WTF ?!

    I know Americans have a weird habit of giving girls "boys' names", although I have no idea why. (Suggestions?) Also of calling actresses "actors".

    But what's the deal with using the masculine pronoun now to refer to women? Or is this just the reverse case, a bloke with a woman's name? (Johnny Cash record anyone?)

  81. That crazy sound my phone... by Shaltenn · · Score: 1

    makes when I'm at the desk at work that drives everyone crazy... I used to think it was my phone sync'ing up or receivng a text message or something. Lately I've noticed that it's making the sound on a daily basis and at times when I'm not receiving anything. I'm not talking like 5-10 seconds here - last night it lasted a full on 45 seconds. Maybe a minute. I had to pull it away from the speaker before I lost my mind. Stupid Razr. Guess I know the cause of that now...

    --
    If you were offended by anything I said... No, I'm not sorry. Please lighten up.
  82. Re:The real answer to 'who are they'- Bill Collect by emilyridesabmx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Using prepaid cell phones seems like a fantastic way to gain anonymity, but at at least here in teh US, pre-paid phones are considered a 'red flag' for evil doing. Remember those poor guys in Minnesota a few months ago? They purchased a hundred or so pre-paid phones, for legitimate sale on Ebay, and were arrested. The logic was pre-paid phones are only used by terrorists and drug dealers. In a way, using a pre-paid phone may attract more attention than just using a standard phone. Very sad, but very true. The reality of the situation is there are only a few thousand bugs/line taps performed by intelligence services each year. They just don't have enough 'listeners' to do all the spying the like. Thankfully we haven't gotten to the point where there is an individual 'listener' for each man woman and child. It probably isn't far off. I'm glad teh article mentioned the 'buzzing speaker test', that was my first thought also, as I've noticed all my phones over the years have created that buzzing sound when they ring or transmit.

    --
    Et In Arcadia Ego
  83. Re:Lauren ..... His ..... WTF ?! by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

    Americans always give girl's mens names. I suspect they just lack all clue. Ashley first and foremost, Lesley, Bailey, Lindsey, Morgan, Taylor and Jordan and on and on. All were originally men's names, but now are almost always given to women. Of course this is why the Yanks think the Brits are all queer; all the men have girls names :)

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  84. Re:Not a bug-- A creature! by itz2000 · · Score: 1

    It's not a bug, it's a feature, hmmm, it's a creature!!!

  85. If you're concerned enough to employ by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
    If you're concerned enough that somebody's listening to employ countermeasures, why not just take the battery out of the phone while you're having your sooper-dooper-secret conversations? Or leave your phones in another room?

    I pity anyone who tries to bug my phone like that. Most of my intentional calls sound like: "Blah blah blah <DROP> curse curse curse. <REDIAL> Blah blah blah <DROP> Fuck you, SprintPCS!!"

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  86. tinfoil box solution by SimonShine · · Score: 1

    So instead of pulling out the batteries taking a stroll while talking to your fellow political activists, you now bring a metal case and explain everyone about the experiments you did at home. Makes for great conversation, and you can take turns carrying the box.

    --
    Take off every 'ZIG' !!
  87. Re:The real answer to 'who are they'- Bill Collect by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The logic was pre-paid phones are only used by terrorists and drug dealers.
    No, the logic was that buying scores of prepaid phones at retail is suspicious activity and worthy of investigation. Buying one or ten is not, or else law enforcement would be wasting a lot of time investigating middle-class and low income families.
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  88. Re:Well, I guess by stunt_penguin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ponies!!!

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  89. Re:The real answer to 'who are they'- Bill Collect by myth24601 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Those callers are bill collectors. Mark was (and likely is) a deadbeat (not that there is anything wrong with that :]). By law, or convention (I'm not really sure) they don't talk about Mark's financial problem with anyone else but Mark. The next round of creditors will start automated messages "I have an important message for Mark (his last name), call...", and this will repeat 4 or more times a day. Get rid of that number now, it won't stop.


    You can probibly tell the bill collectors that you are not that person and ask them to stop calling you and they will. Another route is to tell them that you are not that person and that the phone they are calling is a business phone, that might work better.

    Another route is to tell them that you are a government worker and that the phone they are calling is your government issued cell phone. I did this with the intention of telling them that if they called again I would refer the matter to the State Attorney General's office but it never came to that as they quite ready to take my number off the list at once.
    --
    No matter where you go, there you are.
  90. backpack devices by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

    There are better ways to hijack someone's phone than to big the physical phone. There are backpack devices that act as miniature cell phone towers you can use. Cell Phone users can dial out on them and see service on their phone, they just won't receive incoming calls. The hijacker can then listen in while they think they are on their carrier's network. I believe the range to be a few hundred feet on these devices. Seems much easier than gaining access to someone's phone.

  91. That will only work for a simple phone. by twitter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    why not simply connect one of those flashy LED thingies to your phone?

    Because newer phones can act as voice recorders and transmit the data later. You don't really think that an ordinary cell phone connection would have sufficient quality do you? It would be much better to make a high quality voice recording and transmit it as a file late at night or while the target is actually using the phone to talk or upload their favorite pictures to Photobucket. Internet capable phones can do all sorts of things regardless of your subscriber allowing you to benefit or not. They are computers with a good chunk of flash memory.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  92. Reminds me of the olden days: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This reminded me of a technique of using the ringer circuit of a standard land-line phone as a microphone. This allows monitoring of ambient conversation even with the phone on-hook. from bugsweep

    Ringer
    This threat is one which is inherent in U.S. telephones and involves the fact that the telephone ringer, in some instruments, is a dynamic transducer. The ringer coil, loosely mounted on its core, is contiguous to a permanent magnet. As with a dynamic microphone, vibrations cause the coil to move in the flux field of the magnet and a voltage similar to room audio is transmitted down the telephone line. Normally, the audio quality is poor; however, occasionally a ringer is encountered which provides excellent audio. It should be noted that the ringer is on the out-going side of the hookswitch and, consequently, is always available to the eavesdropper without access to the telephone instrument.
  93. Everything is on record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember how the cell phone calls from people on the hijacked planes appeared following 9/11? I think this goes to show that EVERY cell phone call is ALWAYS recorded and stored someplace for future investigation. Why this didn't come up as a privacy concern at the time makes no sense to me.

    If you have a conversation that you would like to keep private, using a telephone is probably the worst way to go about it. If you're a privacy freak or need to have a private conversation, you probably shouldn't carry a cell phone around with you or hang out with other people who are carrying one.

  94. The LED replaces the antenna by wsanders · · Score: 1

    The LED thingys replace the antenna. Since it takes 10 or 20 mW to light up a LED that's a pretty good fraction of the phone power. If you're near a tower, you phone might operate at only 100 or 200 mW, unmolested.

    If you're paranoid enough to suspect your cell phone is bugged, then someone in your organization probbaly knows how to sweep for this kind of thing. If you're operating alone, go accidentally blow yourself up already.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  95. Audible interference by ^_^x · · Score: 1

    On no less than three stereo systems and three phones, I've been able to hear when my phone's communicating with the tower, so for me that would be the first sign.

    Motorola StarTac (AMPS?)
    *pop-pop* *pop* (before any connection)

    Nokia.... impossible to remember serial number 65xx? (CDMA)
    *low BUZZZZZZZZZZZZ*

    Nokia 3220 (GSM)
    *bip* *bip-bip* *bip-bip* *bip-bip* *bip-bip* *bzzzzzzzzzzzzz....* (receiving a call)
    *bip* *bip-bip* *bip-bip* *bip-bip* *bip-bip* *bip-bip* ... (updating with tower)

  96. You really want to know? by DaveJay · · Score: 1

    I can tell you, with absolute certainly, whether your phone is transmitting or not. I can do it without breaking open any device, and without having to touch you or your phone. I can do it for $50, provided there's an AC power source nearby.

    How? Two words: baby monitor.

    Go pick up a Sony cordless rechargeable baby monitor. Plug in the transmitter, set the receiver to the same channel, and turn it on. Lots of electronic devices pick up interference, but the Sony baby monitor (and probably most others, but Sony is the kind I happen to have) makes noise when a nearby phone is transmitting, whether it's just checking in for your voicemail, telling the tower that it's ready to accept a call, or actually transmitting.

    Different phones make different amounts of noise, and what they're doing matters; my Nokia 6101 needs to be within three feet, but my wife's Blackberry can make noise from five feet away. They both make the most noise if they're sending pictures, but they make noise if there's any transmitting activity whatsoever.

    These are T-Mobile phones, so the carrier you use may produce different results, but this is a simple and valid way -- if you're in a meeting and are really paranoid -- to guarantee nobody's phone is transmitting. Make it a small room, randomly place multiple receivers around the room, etc. -- you only need one transmitter so that there's silence on the line, but you can use as many receivers as you need to cover the area, and the Sony comes in a convenient pack with two rechargeable receivers.

    Do I do this? No, not a tinfoil type here. However, my wife and I have to go out of our way to keep our phones away from the monitor, however, because the noise is annoying -- so you shouldn't have any trouble making this work.

    1. Re:You really want to know? by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      LOLOMGWTFBBQROFL!!11

      if you're in a meeting and are really paranoid -- to guarantee nobody's phone is transmitting. Make it a small room, randomly place multiple receivers around the room, etc. -- you only need one transmitter so that there's silence on the line

      Are you for freaking real? "Paranoid that somebody may be listening in via your phone? Turn on a baby monitor transmitter to defeat the bug!

      Uh, dude. That has got to be the dumbest damned thing I've read on /. in many moons. (And _THAT_ is saying something.)

      With all due respect,

      Someone who's sat up nights listening to the neighbors fuck via the baby monitor that they left on that happens to be the same freq as mine

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
  97. Re:your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Himsa is a pretty big metal band - does your brother know he's going up against guys that will beat the crap out of him for using a name that means 'non-violence'?

    They chose Himsa because it means the opposite of Ahymsa.

  98. Slashdotting with Spam by Absentminded-Artist · · Score: 1

    I'm sure Lauren appreciates having his email address linked on the front page of Slashdot. All the spammers appreciate it too.

    --
    The Splintered Mind - Overcoming
  99. There is an easier way by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    Simply put your cellphone in a ziplock bag and put it in the dishwasher, washing machine, or dryer (on low) for the duration of your sensitive conversation.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  100. UK Monitoring by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

    Soon they'll have people actively monitoring your cell phone's microphone so they can tell you to stop doing what you are doing as you do it.

    --
    My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  101. If you can record, you might hear more than voice by Xetrovic · · Score: 1

    If you can write software to detect voice, you can probably write software to detect GSM interference with speakers. It might not be fool-proof, but it can conceivably prevent detection to a degree.

  102. Re:The real answer to 'who are they'- Bill Collect by db32 · · Score: 1

    FYI your insurance company didn't play a "card" and the judge had no choice in the matter (except to agree to delay without forcing you to actually go through the simple steps of forcing the judge to agree to delay). Servicemembers Civil Relief Act of 2003 aka The Act formally known as Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940. Check it out. Some very valuable information in there in regards to many things even beyond civil court proceedings.

    See...everyone now n then those worthless congress critters do something good for us...granted it was mostly done in 1940 and only updated in 2003. And now they are back to stripping our benefits, taking our pay, cutting back the force while increasing the force commitments abroad... I find it entertaining that they pander to so many lobbyists and special interests to get voted in while totally forgetting the fact that the job only exists so long as the military is there to protect it.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  103. Re:Well, I guess by LazyEmc2 · · Score: 1

    OMG!

    --
    "I'm in it to win it, and no limit is my home." - Snoop Dog c/o PvP Online (July 12th, 2006)
  104. Re:The real answer to 'who are they'- Bill Collect by trentblase · · Score: 1

    I think that counts as a card.

  105. In theory, but have you ever bult a darkroom? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    A darkroom is the same problem at a different wavelength. Small flaws let small amounts of radiation inside. Get too close to a crack, and there's a fair amount of light: get too close to an opening in your mesh bag or a seam in your metal box and there's signal. The phone has to work over a wide range of signal strengths to begin with. At least it would be easy to test your work.

  106. Easier than that by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    >alter the phone's behavior sufficiently to initiate a call without your intervention

    All the phone has to do in order to be a bug is to answer an incoming call automatically and without ringing. Small software change.

  107. Flight mode? by burning_plastic · · Score: 1

    Many recent phones/PDAs have a flight mode so that you can use the music/PDA functionality of the device while on a plane that doesn't allow cell phone use.

    Wouldn't allowing remote circumvention of this flight mode be a safety risk in some cases, and if evidence of this kind were brought out in court, couldn't the defendant charge the law enforcement agency for reckless endangerment (or something similar) for making use of a device that had the potential to interfere with the navigation/takeoff/landing electronics of the aircraft.

    Similarly, if the flight mode directly turned off the transmitter/receiver, unless the firmware had a built in time delay switch on or something like that, how would you remotely re-activate the phone?

  108. 540kHz = 555 meters not 2 km! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Compare with, say, AM radio which has wavelengths up to 2km at the extreme."

    540kHz, the bottom of the AM radio dial = 555 meters not 2 km!

  109. Re:The real answer to 'who are they'- Bill Collect by db32 · · Score: 1

    My point is he shouldn't view it as a special "card" that helped him out because a clever insurance company convinced a judge to help him. Its a hefty sledgehammer to be dropped on people trying to jerk service members around, and his insurance company was good enough to break out the hammer and say "Don't make me use this". Every service member should know about it, unfortunately many are never told about it and believe things like this to be fortunate circumstance and never realize they have this tool to protect themselves.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  110. Video Phones see all by WHAMP3 · · Score: 1

    Just think what the government has been doing with all those video phones we all have. All you most private and intimate moments are now recorded and saved!!!

  111. what about private companies? by kipple · · Score: 1

    'scuse me, but what if it isn't the government spying on you but are private companies? Say, mobile providers could download software on some VIP's cellphone (I mean real VIPs, not stars..) and listen for what they say: money transactions, bank accounts, stock buying...

    remember echelon? it was designed as a government spying device, it turned up to be something that private companies used to spy other companies in europe (boing vs. airbus).

    why does it always have to be the government?

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
  112. long wave (LW) AM goes down to 150 kHz by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

    540kHz is the bottom end of medium wave (MW). Other AM radio sets, especially older or more "international" sets include long wave (LW), which goes down to about 150kHz.

  113. whoa... ashely & lindsey by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    are boy names?!?!?!?!?!?

    News to me.

    I know a girl named Scott, and a guy named Stacy...

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    1. Re:whoa... ashely & lindsey by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      Well...they used to be. They spelled it Ashleigh (sounds the same). Wasn't there a guy named Ashleigh in Gone with the Wind? Actually I know a guy named Ashleigh, although he mostly goes by "Ash" these days.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.