Slashdot Mirror


Controlling Computers With the Brain

Killam0n takes note of a story in CNN Money on progress in controlling computers via brainwaves. From an aspirin-sized implant a quadriplegic is now using to play computer games, the article extrapolates out to a near future in which we will all be wearing headband computers and IM'ing one another as if telepathically. "Two years ago, a quadriplegic man started playing video games using his brain as a controller. That may just sound like fun and games for the unfortunate, but really, it spells the beginning of a radical change in how we interact with computers — and business will never be the same. Someday, keyboards and computer mice will be remembered only as medieval-style torture devices for the wrists. All work — emails, spreadsheets, and Google searches — will be performed by mind control."

253 comments

  1. I'm not jacking in by no_pets · · Score: 3, Funny

    Screw that! I'm not connecting my brain to the company network.

    --
    "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
    1. Re:I'm not jacking in by crAckZ · · Score: 1

      i agree. to much can go wrong. what would happen if something shorted out inside your head? you could loose the power of speech or worse. i see the great points but until it can be proven 100% flawless i dont know if it is worth the risks? then what if someone developed malicouse software to read the waves and installed it on a pc? the device has a backdoor that sends waves on a different wave and all your info is now someone elses. to many problems are around this. i do think it is great for those with disabilities like in the story. but for general public this is scary.

    2. Re:I'm not jacking in by Radon360 · · Score: 1

      ...and for those who do, somebody better setup some clear definitions on where the corporate equipment ends and the privately owned "equipment" begins. Might bring new meaning to the phrase "the company owns my brain."

      Then again, we're just talking about controlling computers directly from the mind (i.e. no mechanical interfaces), not directly reading/writing information from the mind...at least not yet.

    3. Re:I'm not jacking in by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 1

      Don't even get me started on the opportunities this give the criminals. Spybots in your head? Viruses? Worms?

      --

      Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
    4. Re:I'm not jacking in by FlyByPC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Meh. It depends on the interface. I'd use an EEG-style system, which noninvasively reads electrical impulses. I'll be damned if I'll let them implant anything, though. Even LASIK is still way too radical for me.

      As far as effectiveness -- and it replacing a keyboard and mouse? Talk to me about bandwidth. Can I fly a plane (Flight Sim) better with mind control? Well, maybe. Can I type up a report faster and with fewer errors than using my Model M? Perhaps someday.

      I think the bottom line is that they are making progress -- but then again, I remember getting a voice-controlled Verbot back in the day. It would do the correct command about 30% of the time, as I remember. Speech recognition has improved, but we're still by and large not dictating our compositions to our PCs, even with three orders of magnitude more memory and CPU speed. Somehow, I think mind-control will take just as much work.

      Then again, I hope they prove me wrong. Just on the coolness factor alone.

      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    5. Re:I'm not jacking in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "All work -- emails, spreadsheets, and Google searches -- will be performed by mind control."

      JUST GREAT!#!@#$!@ ... and you thought pop-ups were annoying NOW

    6. Re:I'm not jacking in by brunascle · · Score: 4, Funny

      aaaaaaggghhhh everytime i look at my wife the goatse guy pops up in the corner of my vision

    7. Re:I'm not jacking in by Radres · · Score: 2, Funny

      That happens to you, too?

    8. Re:I'm not jacking in by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Screw that! I'm not connecting my brain to the company network.

      Oh come on chummer! It ain't that bad unless you tamper with the company's Black ICE!

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    9. Re:I'm not jacking in by brian.gunderson · · Score: 1

      Message from system process 'conscience' :

      Intended action may not be moral.
      Cancel / Allow ?

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    10. Re:I'm not jacking in by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      " I'll be damned if I'll let them implant anything, though. Even LASIK is still way too radical for me."

      Well, I'm hesitant to have LASIK, 'cause I notice that pretty much all the doctors performing the procedure are all wearing glasses.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:I'm not jacking in by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Message from system process 'conscience' :

      Intended action may not be moral.

      Cancel / Allow ?"

      Even worse....the 'hitman' out to get you is a Unix admin:

      "Warning, the system is going down in 1 min....please kiss your ass goodbye".

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re:I'm not jacking in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The computers require read access to your mind to be controlled. basically stuff like this picks up on the noise from your brain about thoughts, I'm not exactly sure on the exact science hopefully someone can post a link to a wiki or something.

      At the moment it seems kinda basic more about movement of objects and such I'm waiting for the time it can really read your thoughts, we will finally be able to note ideas we have forgotten when our minds wonder. However this brings in a lot of privacy issues, personally I'm not going to get into this as its not even near the day when its required.

    13. Re:I'm not jacking in by crawly · · Score: 1

      Have been using this system for awhile now, the worst thing is it keeps popping up the browser and opening German porn sites. Hate the think what the network admins here think.

      --
      GCS/S d-x s+(+): a C++++$ UL+$ P+ L++$ !E--- W++@ N++>$ !o !K-- w++$ !O !M !V PS++>$ PE !Y PGP+ t+ 5++ X++ R tv b
    14. Re:I'm not jacking in by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm hesitant to have LASIK, 'cause I notice that pretty much all the doctors performing the procedure are all wearing glasses.

      Maybe it's the story about the town with two barbers...

      You want to choose the barber with the bad haircut, since the other one cut his hair, right? Maybe the good LASIK doctors wear glasses.

      ...but I'm still sticking with glasses, thankyouverymuch.
      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    15. Re:I'm not jacking in by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Funny

      And Lord forbid that the thing causes your spelling and lack of capitalization to degenerate FURTHER!

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    16. Re:I'm not jacking in by pakar · · Score: 1

      Watch out for 0-day exploits and never get something from Microsoft installed! ^_^

    17. Re:I'm not jacking in by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      Don't fear new technology just because it's new. There's no reason to believe that something shorting out in your head and destroying your power of speech is any more likely than the screen you have now shorting out and killing you by an explosion or something. Nothing can ever be proven 100% flawless. If we never used a technology until it was "proven 100% flawless", we would still be lighting candles to see at night, because the 50/60Hz EM waves from electric lighting might have some unknown effect on us. I'm not entirely sure what you mean about hacking the device, but if you're talking about people spying on what is being sent between your brain and the computer, this can be done already by Van Eck phreaking, keyloggers, and many software hacks etc. Anyway, if you claim that we shouldn't use a technology because there would be bad consequences if it broke or got hacked, then by your logic we shouldn't be using computers at all.

    18. Re:I'm not jacking in by bdijkstra · · Score: 1

      And Lord forbid that the thing causes your spelling and lack of capitalization to degenerate FURTHER! Who would want to limit himself to the mediocre expression capabilities of written (or spoken) language? With brain waves, you should be able to communicate in graphs and symbols.
    19. Re:I'm not jacking in by somersault · · Score: 1

      Strangely, nobody seems to have commented on the possibility of this being used to control an exoskeleton or 30 storey robotic armour.. that seems like one of the primary applications to me? ;) And hopefully this will stay as an input device only, I don't want google ads invading my thoughts too :(

      --
      which is totally what she said
    20. Re:I'm not jacking in by chris.evans · · Score: 1

      Oh woe! Hackers have cracked by brain and pwnd my email.

  2. Really? by east+coast · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someday, keyboards and computer mice will be remembered only as medieval-style torture devices for the wrists. All work -- emails, spreadsheets, and Google searches -- will be performed by mind control.

    You lazy bastards.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:Really? by Frymaster · · Score: 1
      All work -- emails, spreadsheets, and Google searches -- will be performed by mind control

      they're already performed by mind control... of your fingers!

      computer use is the fine art of taking data stored in a chemical analog format (your brain) transferring it to an electronic digital format (your computer) via a mechanical method (typing).

    2. Re:Really? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't think of it as lazy. Think of it as freeing up a second hand to reach for the Kleenex.

    3. Re:Really? by Tabernaque86 · · Score: 1

      I much prefer a keyboard/mouse combo. If I'm angry at someone, I'd rather have the relative "slowness" of typing to hinder me from calling them a fucknut, as opposed to thinking it and immediately having it sent to them. Gives me more chance to develop some common sense, calm down, and not make an ass of myself.

    4. Re:Really? by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      Thanks. You owe me a new keyboard... ;-)

    5. Re:Really? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      And if we already had this technology, you wouldn't even have had a keyboard to replace. :)

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    6. Re:Really? by garnheart · · Score: 1

      Who are you and what are you doing on my internet?

      --
      -Garnheart
    7. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ew, did you spooge on yours?

  3. Mind-controlled computers will last until... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mind-controlled computers will last until all trained computer operators have been sacked for sending rude emails to the boss. Worst part? They won't even know they've done it.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    1. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by Radon360 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great, so now we can look forward to people unwittingly sending flaming or sexually harrassing emails in their sleep and not know it until they get called on it the next day.

      What buzzword should develop for this phenomena?

      Sleeptexting?

      InSPAMnia?

    2. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by Metasquares · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If we can determine what people are thinking, we can certainly determine whether they're in a fully conscious state while they're doing it. With proper precautions, I don't think that's an issue.

    3. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by Radon360 · · Score: 1

      we can certainly determine whether they're in a fully conscious state while they're doing it

      Except that I swear that there are quite a few people that aren't in a fully conscious state until after the third cup of coffee. Cool! That means a lot less incoming email until after 10am or so.

    4. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of this - applies particularly well to slashdot http://xkcd.com/c269.html

    5. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by harry666t · · Score: 1

      msg = me->newmessage();
      if (me->sleeping() == true)
        msg.discard();

    6. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by dlthomas · · Score: 1

      More interesting would be msg.write(diary); Ties into a recent xkcd...

    7. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you dream about a (possibly unwanted) sexual encounter with a coworker or boss, even if you would never, ever, do something like that when awake, I seriously doubt your company would just ignore that information, as you "weren't conscious" when you sent the email.

    8. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "If we can determine what people are thinking..."

      What a scary ass concept THAT is!!

      At the very least...I've heard it put forth, that if women could REALLY know what men were thinking....they'd be running screaming for the hills.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by harry666t · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that you'd like to remember everything you were dreaming of all the night?

    10. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      If I wanted people to determine what I'm thinking in the first place, I'd fscking say it.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    11. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me a poignant episode of Muppet Babies. Young Kermit was granted his wish: to be able to read minds. He began using his power innocently enough but soon learned that this was not a gift, but a terrible curse. All of his friends soon shunned him for fear of privacy. Even Nanny abandoned him. And then young Kermit wished with all his might that he be rid of the gift.

      But his second wish was never granted. And now he is all alone, just like King Midas.

      Say, can I have a dollar?

    12. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by dlthomas · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it would either be interesting or not.

    13. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "I think most women would say "Why didn't you tell me you wanted that?"

      I have an acquaintance who works with couples breaking up. Very often the man will have hooked up with a different women to do something kinky, and their soon to be ex-wife says "Why didn't you ask me to do that with you?"

      That lesson changes my bedroom life forever.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Hence, a need for a new invention...

      The tinfoil nightcap!

    15. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      And I thought looking to Star Trek for deep though was sad. This is over the top :)

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    16. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      TCMP. Once again, reality imitates xkcd.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    17. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by jimbojw · · Score: 1

      Quick! Somebody grab inspamnia.com while it's still available. HURRY!

    18. Re:Mind-controlled computers will last until... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Maybe, on the other hand, she's saying that AFTER she becomes aware that the consequence of not doing that was his infidelity. Would she have agreed to it if she'd been ask before knowing the inevitable result? The problem with trying to take lessons from what couples say as they break up is that both parties are trying to justify (even if only to themselves) why the other party is the unreasonable one and the cause of the breakup.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  4. Hmmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well this technology won't help the unfortunate post responses on Slashdot....because anyone who uses their brain doesn't post on here!!

  5. That's old news. by untaken_name · · Score: 1

    I have been using my mind to post for years now. My mind comes up with the content *and* tells my fingers how to get it on the screen. I have always said that I'm way ahead of my time.

    1. Re:That's old news. by dlthomas · · Score: 1

      Funny, it's not all that apparent...

      (... no actual offense meant, of course)

    2. Re:That's old news. by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      None taken, of course.

  6. Hmmm... by HappySmileMan · · Score: 0

    "Two years ago, a quadriplegic man started playing video games using his brain as a controller."

    Where's my brain-controller... If that's not reverse-discrimination I don't know what is...

    On topic, how exactly could this possibly work... You can think about doing something without actually doing it
    What if the string "rm -rf /" popped into my head for some reason?
    1. Re:Hmmm... by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      What if the string "rm -rf /" popped into my head for some reason? Don't think enter?
    2. Re:Hmmm... by lexarius · · Score: 1

      The brain is good at controlling things. Most people are able to think "rm -rf" without accidently saying it out loud or typing it into the keyboard they have their hands on. Try this: Think "Stand!" at your legs, as though you were trying to command them telepathically. This (probably) doesn't have any effect, because your legs aren't controlled by your "inner voice". Instead, you stand up by moving your legs in a particular fashion. With a properly calibrated neural interface (and training), the device would do things when you make it do things, not when you think commands at it. Unless perhaps you improperly calibrate it to do things when you think commands at it, which would probably not be a good idea.

    3. Re:Hmmm... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "What if the string "rm -rf /" popped into my head for some reason?"

      That just mean you need social help.

      Of course the account your doing work probably wont have that option, and you would need to be focused on a place that the live means something.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Hmmm... by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      No worries, I didn't think sudo first

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
  7. Could we come up with articles a little older? by smithbp · · Score: 5, Informative

    This article is date July 24, 2006...I might be wrong, but this would make it a bit outdated and probably not worthy of being on the frontpage of /.

    1. Re:Could we come up with articles a little older? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, at least there weren't any misspellings!!!

    2. Re:Could we come up with articles a little older? by FlyByPC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Outdated? Slashdot?
      You must be new here.

      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    3. Re:Could we come up with articles a little older? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're probably using the wrong metaphor for slashdot. Slashdot is like a wine cellar. This story is an amusing vintage with citrus-y overtones and an underlying note of distopia. Should go great with Salmon.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:Could we come up with articles a little older? by uolamer · · Score: 1

      I doubt it would matter if it was dated in the 1990s as far as normal people being able to buy/use this. I would guess in 20 years this might be as far as Virtual reality has gotten in the last 20 years.... now if we could just combine the two.. throw in a feeding tube, etc etc..... We would all be stuck in the matrix.. or we would end up with "The 13th Floor" becoming a reality.. Seriously i cant want for the world to end, then i can take off my goggles and say i want my money back, the MMORPG i been playing the last 30 years sucked.

      --
      s/©//g
    5. Re:Could we come up with articles a little older? by dotpavan · · Score: 2, Funny

      uh uh, kdawson had "thought of" posting it that week (using his brain-controlled-laptop), but somehow it slipped. Just like this was supposed to be a first post!

    6. Re:Could we come up with articles a little older? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only was this article published in '06 but I can't count the number of times this exact tech has made /. front page. The work is being spear-headed by John Donoghue at Brown University (who is also the CEO of Cyberkenetics. So please stop submitting these news articles to /. .

      I am sick of hearing another news-writer's take on this fascinating tech.

    7. Re:Could we come up with articles a little older? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, ever driven to the edge of the place you're most unlikely to go? Didn't think so...

    8. Re:Could we come up with articles a little older? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Run into the girls' toilets... If there's a blank void or a surprising presence of urinals, the aliens couldn't reconstruct that part of your world because you've never been there before. Obviously.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    9. Re:Could we come up with articles a little older? by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      It's a shame the Matrix "ate" 13th floor at the box office, it was actually a really entertaining film that would likely be enjoyed by similar demographics.

    10. Re:Could we come up with articles a little older? by Wooster_UK · · Score: 1

      Yes... I submitted this story shortly after I read it; but there was no news of it on /. at all (neither my submission nor anyone else's), until now. It rather makes you wonder why we bother.

      Slashdot: News for nerds who don't keep up. Stuff that mattered.

  8. What a terrible path by steveo777 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is where we get into big trouble. At one point or another, everyone wants a phone that can listen in to the other line a few seconds after the call is ended. Just to hear what the jack ass on the other line really thinks. With thoughts 'controlling' your keyboards these kinds of things will happen. With this kind of stuff around, we'll be accidentally IMing the wrong thought at the wrong time to the wrong person.

    The next step will be mind-controlled Gundam-style robots for everyone. What's this world coming to?!

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    1. Re:What a terrible path by brunascle · · Score: 1

      i believe most of these mind-controlled-computer devices kind of work the way you move parts of your body, not the way you think. so you feel like you're moving your arm, but the nerves are connected to a computer.

      to accidentally IM someone would be like accidentally punching them. it happens, but i wouldnt lose sleep over it.

    2. Re:What a terrible path by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      With thoughts 'controlling' your keyboards these kinds of things will happen
      Ya, just like sometimes my thoughts controlling my foot make me kick my mom in the face. The article mentions he was able to hold a conversation with the researchers while still controlling the device, which makes me think it doesn't require full concentration. It seems less like reading your mind and more like your mind telling it what to do; as in, you can still think random things, none of which will matter, until you go through that specific thought process that the device is looking for. I can only speculate so much, the article was very light on details. However, I don't think this is a sign of the Apocalypse.
      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    3. Re:What a terrible path by Yvanhoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      lapsus exist in the real world, you have to control your mind for these not to happen. I think the same is really easy to do once you can have a feedback to know what exactly is "heard". Right now it seems frightening because you don't know how it works, but once you have tried it and created a communication model in your brain, I think you will be fully able to retain "thought-saying" "jackass" while still thinking it

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    4. Re:What a terrible path by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      If done properly, I assume it would be like talking. If you can keep your mouth shut and not say the wrong thing at the wrong time, it should be possible to have similar control over a brain-IM interface.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    5. Re:What a terrible path by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      Do I get a silver mask with my Tallgeese?

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    6. Re:What a terrible path by rolando2424 · · Score: 1

      The next step will be mind-controlled Gundam-style robots for everyone

      Bah, I would prefer Evas :D

      Also, what would happen if you are doing a Google search and think about porn?

      I guess we'll just have to wait and see...

      --
      Okay seriously I've just run out of pointless things to say.
    7. Re:What a terrible path by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Oh! The never-ending Gundam vs. Eva debate. I'm for Gundams. You don't have to plug those in. Yeah, I know that the Evas are mostly human, but they're too hard to control. And I'm not a 14 year old, so I can't pilot one of them anyway.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    8. Re:What a terrible path by rolando2424 · · Score: 1

      And I'm not a 14 year old, so I can't pilot one of them anyway.

      Touché I guess...

      Also, I don't see why we would need 40 meters high city-wrecking robots...

      (and it might not be the best idea to put that kind of power in a 14 years old kid)

      --
      Okay seriously I've just run out of pointless things to say.
    9. Re:What a terrible path by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      So you vote for John Kerry or George Bush because you truly believe what they say. What if you knew their true motivations? Is it a bad thing when politicians are caught off-guard saying what they really think?

      Your girlfriend ask if she's getting big, and you say, "Of course, not", while secretly thinking how your fixing to dump her fat ass. Wouldn't it be much better if she knew you were dissatisfied? And you knew that she thought you should get your lazy ass off the couch, also?

      I just think a large part of the lies we tell each other is just culturally sanitized bullshit that we use to avoid having to actually understand another's viewpoint (because that is actually hard and time consuming). Usually the most 'sociable' people are those most successful at hiding what they really think, i.e. the lying scum of the earth. Then we wonder why our leaders tend to be disengenuous. I don't see a problem with being able to know what people really think.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    10. Re:What a terrible path by Firefly1 · · Score: 1

      The next step will be mind-controlled Gundam-style robots for everyone.
      Actually, I think the MiG-31 Firefox and XF-34A DreamStar beat them to it...
      And since someone brought it up, I for one believe Gundams and their contemporary mobile suits are more militarily viable than Evangelions. On which note, a colleague brought to my attention recently a rather interesting tidbit: the Gundams and other mobile suits were originally intended to be powered armor (ala BGC's K-12s, SHIELDs/CIDs in recent Dale Brown novels, or Zone Trooper gear in C&C3), but someone figured the best way to compete with all the 'super robot' shows airing at the time was... with another 'super robot' show.
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
    11. Re:What a terrible path by bandmassa · · Score: 1

      People already do inadvertant text replies. You know, you're thinking what an arse "Bill" (not his real name) is, so you go to text "Jenny" (not her real name), "Hey, Jen, Bill's an arse!" and accidentally send it to Bill because his is the name in your mind and the first of the two parties in your alphabetised directory. Predictive text only exacerbates this, of course.

      --
      "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
    12. Re:What a terrible path by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      I'm guilty of those sorts of shenanigans. Hopefully in the near future I'll be piloting a super robot so I can back up those claims.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  9. That's all fine and dandy by chatgris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Until we find out what kind of torture this imparts on the BRAIN.

    Personally, I'd take the risks from straining my wrists due to mechanical motion over implanting a chip (along with unknown stressors) in my brain any day. If I'm going to potentionally cause harm to one part of my body, it'll be my wrists over my brain.

    I'm not a luddite, really! But my brain is just too vital to me to start tossing implants into it.

    --
    Open Your Mind. Open Your Source.
    1. Re:That's all fine and dandy by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you have the use of your wrists you insensitive clod. :p
      If I were quad or even paraplegic, I'd personally be willing to risk a couple of short circuits in the grey matter if it meant an enhanced quality of life.

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    2. Re:That's all fine and dandy by ThePopeLayton · · Score: 1

      You make a really good point. The brain unlike most tissues in the body does not have the capacity to regenerate itself (in the majority of circumstances). Inserting an electrode, microchip, stint, or anything into the brain KILLS neurons and damages the brain. Whether or not this damage is going to have lasting effect depends upon many factors.

      This is why these implants are only the current solution. They are only for people who really need them (like guys who drive a wheel chair with a straw). They can implant the chip into a part of the brain that has been disconnected from the body so the damage done is negligable.

      When EEG, ECOG, MEG, etc... tech gets better we (hopefully) will be able to monitor individual neuron activity without implanting anything into the brain. When that happens is what the article was referring to when it mentioned replacing a keyboard with a headband.

    3. Re:That's all fine and dandy by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      It is going to suck pretty bad anyway. I can type without thinking about individual letters.... I doubt these interfaces will 'see' words, and thinking about each letter will be a slow process.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    4. Re:That's all fine and dandy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is going to suck pretty bad anyway. I can type without thinking about individual letters.... I doubt these interfaces will 'see' words, and thinking about each letter will be a slow process. Similar to when you first started to type?

      But you do think about individual letters, unless your hands know the words. Things you do slip out of your conscious attention with practice, and the idea is you'll get better at mindtyping in a similar way.
    5. Re:That's all fine and dandy by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      I disagree, the brain's regenerates, just differently. Rather than replacing what's been damaged (which it can still do to a much lesser extent), it changes the capabilities of other areas to compensate. That's why we can remove half of a persons brain, or sever the Corpus Callosum and still have the people function normally. If this technology works, it'll displace a small amount of functionality elsewhere, nothing more. If it doesn't work, it will have only ruined the lives of the people who were hungering and needing it the most until we're more sure of the side effects. While that's still not desirable, it does place the risk with the group that also gets the greatest benefit.

    6. Re:That's all fine and dandy by ThePopeLayton · · Score: 1

      I think the word you were looking for is adapts. The brain doesn't regenerate (well most structures, one current theory behind limitless memory is the constant birth of new neurons in the Hippocampus).
      Yes the brain can adapt to the loss of structures and tissue; however, this adaptation has limits. The ability for a 24 month old baby to adapt to the loss of a brain region is very different from that of a 60 year old man. Also you mention the cutting of the Corpus Callosum and how that people still function normally. Normal is a very relative term.
      If you were to meet someone who had their corpus callosum cut you probably wouldn't know, but if you got to know them and watched them in their private life you would see a huge change in them. From wikipedia "A patient with a split brain, when shown an image in his or her left visual field (the left half of what each eye sees), will be unable to name what he or she has seen. This is because the speech control center is in the left side of the brain in most people and the image from the left visual field is sent only to the right side of the brain. Since the two sides of the brain cannot communicate, the patient can't name what he or she is seeing. The person can, however, pick up a corresponding object (one within the left overall visual field) with their left hand, since that hand is controlled by the right side of their brain." Eventually the patient learns to adapt but the brain never regenerates the lost tissue.

    7. Re:That's all fine and dandy by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Apparently at some early stage of development brain cells haven't totally differentiated themselves to specific tasks and seem to be developing around their environment. If we implanted even a binary switch at that stage the brain could learn to manipulate and interpret it. The hard part isn't the brain, it's communicating with the brain.

      From a couple earlier articles I read the ways they are doing this currently are through general brain state readings (Electromagnetic general conditions in certain areas like "excited" or "concentrating" or through specific nerve linkages that could control muscles, unfortunately these are both one way communication channels, when the brain starts getting feedback it can understand its development will start to reflect this advance.

  10. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only retards will have these implants.......yeah, I'm goin to put a foreign object into my brain for something that trivial......not.

    1. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GB2 to Digg

  11. Excellent!!! by arthurpaliden · · Score: 4, Funny

    No more brainless computer users.

    1. Re:Excellent!!! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      *looks horrified* But then whatever will happen to Slashdot?

    2. Re:Excellent!!! by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      No more brainless computer users.


      Except in the case of viri... which might redefine the term zombie computer
  12. we are the borg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    resistance is futi...BSOD...

    1. Re:we are the borg by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Voltage over current is futile. The phonetics of your speech segments will be changed for easier pronunciation.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  13. Reminds me of the Vertebrane in "Manna" by ribuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This reminds me of the futuristic story "Manna" by Marshall Brain (the founder of HowStuffWorks.com).

    In the story, computers progressively dehumanise work in the interests of efficiency (imagine Amazon's Mturk applied to McDonalds). When things get really bad, the protagonist is lucky enough to be rescued and taken to Australia where an alternative future project has produced what seems at first glance to be paradise (but is it really?).

    Anyway, the human-computer interface in the Australia project is an implant that replaces the top three vertebrae.

    The story is not a masterpiece, but it's an enjoyable and thought-provoking read.

  14. Because someone has to say it.... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 3, Informative

    "You mean you have to use you hands? That's like a baby's toy!"

  15. Obligatory Post by sehlat · · Score: 1

    All work -- emails, spreadsheets, and Google searches -- will be performed by mind control. I, for one, welcome the new overlords who will control our minds so we work.
  16. Re:In Soviet Russia... by FST · · Score: 1

    It's okay. The computer made you do it.

    --
    46487 466780 252994 376409 96920 39622 205366 244315 622115 512361 668040 63608 259203 955314 811176 652718 166330 23922
  17. Already typing telepathically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've been SEX typing telepathically for some SEX time now. It's kinda SEX annoying when other SEX thoughts pop into my SEX head.

    1. Re:Already typing telepathically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You know...this guy has a point! My mind wanders too... there is NO way we will be able to control computers or enter text by thinking. There's just no way!

      Me trying to "think" the preamble to the Constitution...

      We the people of [damn im horny] the United States in [that new secretary is HOT!!!] order to form a more perfect [i wonder if she's taken] union, establish [hmmm I think I'm gonna go get a coke after I do this] justice....

    2. Re:Already typing telepathically by jibjibjib · · Score: 1
      It is possible for you to think about moving your arm without actually moving it. I don't find myself accidentally moving my arm when I think about picking something up off the table; the movement only happens when I actually decide to pick up the object.

      A good neural interface would work the same way. There would be a clear distinction between thinking about something, and actually inputting it.

  18. This could be awkward by Brian+Ribbon · · Score: 1

    What happens when you think the business client you're e-mailing is an asshole?

    --
    "To the future or to the past, to a time when thought is free" ~ Nineteen Eighty-Four
    1. Re:This could be awkward by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      What happens when you think the business client you're e-mailing is an asshole?
      Just guessing, but I'm thinking most of your messages have a goatse link embedded in them.
      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  19. Powerful brains by Jeff+Hornby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But what if my brain isn't powerful enough to control a computer?

    --
    Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?
    1. Re:Powerful brains by Aeamarth · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That's obvious, the computer controls YOU!!! (in Soviet Russia, of course)

    2. Re:Powerful brains by dotpavan · · Score: 1

      you are sent to Soviet Russia, where it controls your brain :)

    3. Re:Powerful brains by hamfactorial · · Score: 1

      Put NetBSD on it!

      --
      Did you know subscribers can see articles in the future? Holy shit!
    4. Re:Powerful brains by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      But what if my brain isn't powerful enough to control a computer? A problem and a solution all in one, how convenient. (channeling BOFH here)
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    5. Re:Powerful brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should run for office!

    6. Re:Powerful brains by Servo · · Score: 1

      Then you'll need to sign up for AOL.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  20. Electronics.. by Mockylock · · Score: 1

    They need to start manufacturing this shit for everyday life for different applications. I'm sure a lot of people would agree when I say that it'd be a nice alternative to plug into a computer than be denied by your wife when you ask for another blowjob.

    --
    "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
    1. Re:Electronics.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean your wife turns you down?

  21. You need an agent. by twitter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Screw that! I'm not connecting my brain to the company network.

    Sooner or later, you won't have a choice. Things will have to be done and you won't be given another way to do it.

    What you will want then is a trusted agent between you and the network. If you did not worry about your computer being run by free software that you can trust, you should start now. Now more than ever, what's yours should stay yours.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:You need an agent. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Twitter, read "Reflections on Trusting Trust". Now. Free software doesn't provide full protection. Nothing does. In fact, we're all already brainwashed by humanity's very behavior. And we always have.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:You need an agent. by dlthomas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Trusting trust, with respect to compilers, was solved a while ago. Provided you have the source for one compiler, compile it on two unrelated compilers. This gives you two binaries which are very probably bitwise different, but should be functionally identical if no one is doing anything fishy. Compile the original source with each of these. The same source through (functionally) the same compiler should produce bitwise identical results. This is easy to verify. If they are the same, then either *both* original compilers have been tampered with *in the same way*, or the result is a true compilation of the source. If that's not thorough enough for you, pick further unrelated compilers, and more of them. You can get the probability of tampering down vanishingly small. Note that it doesn't matter how old/obscure/slow/pessimizing the compilers in question are, as long as they correctly support the language.

    3. Re:You need an agent. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      What you will want then is a trusted agent between you and the network.

      And that trusted agent is not going to be made by Symantec, I guess.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:You need an agent. by CliffSpradlin · · Score: 1

      This doesn't work at all.

      GCC produces wildly different binaries from VC++ or ICC. The C and C++ specs don't define the binary output of a compiler, they only define the behavior of the binary generated.

      Compilers have widely varying ways of emitting ASM. Even within a single compiler, you can produce a binary that is debug-compatable, optimized, really fucking optimized, or any combination thereof.

      Indeed, the difference in emitted code is often the selling point of a compiler. Offhand, I can't think of any two compilers for any language that would produce the same output.

    5. Re:You need an agent. by dlthomas · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. As my plain English explanation was apparently unclear, let me formalize it a bit.

      We have 2 compilers, C1 and C2, and the source to one compiler, call it S (it may or may not be the source to C1 or C2, this is immaterial).

      Let us refer to compilation by a compiler with simple function-application notation. That is to say, C1(S) will be the compilation of S by C1.

      You point out that C1(S) is not going to be bitwise equivalent to C2(S). I stated this.

      C1(S) is, however, going to be *functionally* equivalent to C2(S), presuming they are C1 and C2 are accurate implementations, as they compile the same code. That is to say, a correct compilation of the same code must *do* the same thing, even if it does it in different ways.

      C1(S) and C2(S) thus will *output* the same results when fed the same input. This is *quite* distinct from C1 and C2 outputting the same results for the same input.

      That is to say, (C1(S))(S) is bitwise equivalent to (C2(S3))(S3) if and only if either C1 and C2 are clean or C1 and C2 have been tampered with in precisely the same way.

      The likelihood of tampering being identical will decrease with more disparate histories of the compilers in question, and the technique can also be extended over any number of compiler binaries.

    6. Re:You need an agent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is still fucking useless when compared to modern QA and regression testing. Good job!

  22. That means there will be an electronic device... by CaptainPatent · · Score: 1

    broadcasting our own thoughts to some degree. While this does seem to be a really cool idea in general, imagine how immense the problem of cybernetic hacking could be. I wouldn't be too quick to jump on the implant list, but after some of the potential privacy issues are worked out or declared null and void I'd be cautious.

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
  23. Typical Typist on a boring afternoon by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Documents to be submitted to the document control center (DCC) must first be approved by the ISO committee, which meets every Tuesday, or Wednesday during a holiday. Submissions must be received before 9AM on Tuesday, preferably by email. Quickly he grabbed Laura and, while holding her tightly, looked deep into her eyes. Her heaving breasts rose and fell in a quickening pace as his hands caressed her hair. His deep, muscular, voice whispered, "Darling, I must have you now!". Documents that have been rejected must be corrected by the author and be approved by a supervisor before resubmitting to the DCC"

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Typical Typist on a boring afternoon by splicer12 · · Score: 1

      Ah, now I understand how those strange spam messages I keep getting are created...

    2. Re:Typical Typist on a boring afternoon by harry666t · · Score: 1

      Since there would be no more keyboards, there would be no other place to look at but the screen. Thus, as soon as you'd notice that you're 'typing' your text in the wrong text area, one thought and it's moved to the right place. Don't think of this "brain interface" as a mere replacement of a keyboard. It's a whole new way to interact with a PC, which is removing one unnecessary layer between the machine and its user.

      By the way... I'd like to try visualising some of my thoughts in GIMP or some music program this way... That'd be kinda... Interesting experience, to see how a computer can represent my feelings and thoughts. I can't wait to see these devices in action...

  24. Dream bigger by Metasquares · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is called BCI (Brain-Computer Interface) technology, and it's a fairly hot topic in HCI these days. I think people are dreaming too low-level, though: there are some things, like composing music, that are far easier to do mentally than physically. These are the things people should be getting excited about (after we perfect curing the disabled with it), not moving mice across the screen and telepathically IMing people, both of which have reasonably natural interfaces already.

    1. Re:Dream bigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm trying to imagine what that sort of HCI would put up on the screen if the user were on a hallucinogenic substance.

    2. Re:Dream bigger by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      i prefer the term Psionics. No, not the malappropriation from D&D. Avi-onics are interfaces/instruments/electronics relating to flight. So Psionics would be mechanical/electronics relating to the mind.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    3. Re:Dream bigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how "BCI" became the rage. I've always called this DNI (Direct Neural Interface) after many, many years of scifi writers having at it. BCI may be technically indistinguishable or identical to DNI depending on specific design though.

      Either way, this has been theorized for more than seven decades now since neural induction was "discovered" in 1924. Old news to scifi diehards I'm afraid...

      I just wish they'd get ON with the research. Granted, we're not going to be able to "think" into a word processor or "think" a graphical movie up to disk - but at least it is some damn progress on something truly useful and amazing after all this time...

  25. How this will work by GammaKitsune · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about this technology to some extent. From what I recall, it's probable that the brain waves that will allow for this sort of technology will require conscious thought on the part of the wearer, and will probably be picked up via a device that sits on the surface of the head, without intrusive surgery. Also, as of right now, we can only pick up signals, not send them back. So take off the tinfoil hats, everyone. It likely won't cause anything more accidental than your hands can already pull cause on a keyboard, no surgery, and no one will be able to use it to control your thoughts. I've seen no good arguments against this technology so far.

    --
    Gamertag: WyleType
  26. Two words... by naoursla · · Score: 1

    Limbic. Spam.

    (with deep respects to Charles Strauss)

  27. No way... viruses by Zzesers92 · · Score: 1

    Bad enough getting a biological virus. Bad enough getting a computer virus. Never going to put myself in a situation where a computer virus can act like a biological virus and impacts my mind. Seriously, no tin foil hat here. Just common sense. Zz

    1. Re:No way... viruses by compro01 · · Score: 1

      AFAICT, this has nothing to do with actual I/O with the brain, but rather just hijacking signals that would ordinarily go to muscles. it's strictly read-only from the brain.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  28. Yeah. Just what I need. by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Just what I need. A computer attached to my brain IMing to everyone what a bunch of dimwitted fucksticks I think they are.

  29. oh the humiliation by Jeek+Elemental · · Score: 5, Funny

    brain not found think "space" to continue

    1. Re:oh the humiliation by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      No no, it'd be "think any thing" to continue, and for the first time literally thinking "any thing" will actually work! We'll have to come up with a new quintessential n00b joke.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    2. Re:oh the humiliation by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      Tch, now you really don't need those hundreds of terrabytes of masturbatory fantasies right?

  30. Great that's just what we need fo our brains by andres32a · · Score: 1

    The latest version of Microsoft Windows implanted in our brains via an Implant. Talk about blue screen of death!

  31. Why not ask... by Vexler · · Score: 1
  32. The next craze for new parents by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Informative

    Given the amazing plasticity of the young brain, the time to do this is when the kid is really really young. Ideally, a child might most effectively learn to mentally control a cursor/computer interface about the same time they learn to control their fingers and toes. At that age it really will make controlling a computer as effortless as walking or talking.

    The time will come when children that didn't get "Baby's First Brain Mouse" in their first few months of life will be at a scholastic disadvantage to those that did.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  33. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia? Hell, the Russian Federation is that now.. you must mean.. In Russian Federation...

  34. Finally a way to truly expose the Id? by Futile+Rhetoric · · Score: 1

    It'll be fascinating to leave it on while you sleep.

    1. Re:Finally a way to truly expose the Id? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Finally a way to truly expose the Id? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  35. Uh...we're all in trouble by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am writing porn this from a computer boobs of the future, sex based on the mind control hot chicks input techniques described teen oral here.

    Since coffee this boobs technology was first sugar implemented, I have hamsters been unable midgets to hold a single job.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Uh...we're all in trouble by Avatar8 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Exactly.


      I don't know of anyone with the discipline to keep a single focused thought in their head for more than one minute. That's how our brains work. We take input from multiple sources, perform all manner of manipulation on it, add our own inner voice and it's rather a cacophony in there.

      Imagine walking down the street of the future wearing one of these headband computers. You're dictating a memo for work, IM'ing your significant other andupdating your grocery list. Just then an attractive man/woman walks by. Not only do all the above functions stop momentarily, but fantasy kicks in and you imagine that person naked. Your headband takes this as a command to open Photoshop, capture an image of the person, alter it to match your mental image and immediately insert it into your document, send it to your SO and updates your grocery list to buy melons or sausage.

      Filtering will be a key hurdle in this technology.

    2. Re:Uh...we're all in trouble by kramulous · · Score: 1

      That was probably the funniest thing I've read in a very long time.

      --
      .
  36. no thanks by dj245 · · Score: 1

    I'll stick to my IBM model M-5 made in 1992 thanks.

    The M-5 is the one with the built-in trackball for those of you not keeping track.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  37. We did, twice by Aeamarth · · Score: 1

    No, don't fool yourself, it has been in the frontpage at least TWICE since that date.

    I would look it up for you but my computer is ignoring the orders given by my brain and is only showing pr0n...

    1. Re:We did, twice by Vexor · · Score: 1

      I would look it up for you but my computer is ignoring the orders given by my brain and is only showing pr0n...

      It's not ignoring your brain. It's just operating off the 2nd one. Since you know....you only have enough blood to run one at a time....

      --
      ~Vexed and loving it!
  38. All work *already* performed by mind control by zooblethorpe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "All work -- emails, spreadsheets, and Google searches -- will be performed by mind control."

    Hell, it already is -- somehow my boss's very whims turn into tasks for me to perform. No real difference here... :-P

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  39. Ob Star Trek by KarMann · · Score: 1

    Keyboard. How quaint.

    --
    ProofReading Markup Language - and yes, I find typos.
  40. Before Barclay there was The Controller by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    Brain and brain! What is Brain?!

    Another sad bit of Star Trek geekdom.

    ...laura who actually watched Star Trek at the time

  41. More cartoon references by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I guess the futurama guys were right. We'll have heads in a jar in no time.

    Bodies... they are surely useless things.

  42. Controlling Computers With the Brain by jimbobborg · · Score: 1

    So what's Pinky going to do?

  43. The devil has gotten inside you, Jobe by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

    So there I was, willing my computer to do my every bidding while stuffing my face with Cheetos and grooming my dog, when suddenly ... I had an epiphony: "My birth cry will be the sound of every phone on this planet ringing in unison."

  44. Mind Control by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    Tell you brain to tell your hands to interface with your computer!

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  45. Ignorance is a bliss by eebra82 · · Score: 1

    I was playing with the idea of controlling my computer with my brain, but ended up a little dizzy and exhausted.

    When I navigate with the mouse and type with a keyboard, I do so without much thinking. However, try to look around a page, look at the word and think "click" every time you want to click something. It is actually kind of difficult, because you don't want to think your actions as much as you want to just click with a mouse button. And what if you play an fps game? Thinking that you have to turn around and shooting at a precise moment will be contra-productive because you can't just sit and stare at a screen for hours without moving around a bit.

    This may of course be something I can get used to and I guess a lot of people would prefer this method, but I doubt I would.

    1. Re:Ignorance is a bliss by XPisthenewNT · · Score: 1

      If you play tag with a group of kids, how much do you think about turning around and tagging someone? This type of technology will be awkward for us old people at first, but soon the moment it's occurred to us that we want to visit a link, it will be loading on the screen.

  46. Absolutely Not by epistemiclife · · Score: 1
    I simply don't believe that most people are willing to have a computer implant put into their brains. I certainly wouldn't, and I love technology.

    "Excuse me, Doctor. I've been blacking out recently. I think it may be the Mark of the Beast that I had implanted last year."

    We still don't even know, for certain, what effects external devices, such as cell phones, impart upon us, in the long term. A more realistic goal, for now, is probably to pursue the parallel research of reading brain waves and using them for "training" in much the same way that we do for voice recognition. There are already videogame concepts which make use of this technology.

    1. Re:Absolutely Not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it may be the Mark of the Beast that I had implanted last year.


      I am soooooo registering "Mark of the Beast" as a trademark for neural implants.
    2. Re:Absolutely Not by jdigriz · · Score: 1

      Ah, the old "we don't even know" argument. Strange how that's never used in a positive sense, as in "Cell phones may make us richer, smarter, more beautiful and longer-lived, but we just don't know."

    3. Re:Absolutely Not by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The cell phone wave length is too big to impact us. we do know that, for a fact.

      You and tyour crazy ignorant cronies don't know that, but don't include intelligent people.

      You video games ? wow, you are right on the edge.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Absolutely Not by epistemiclife · · Score: 1

      Actually, there have been conflicting studies with regard to whether the radiation from cell phones has effects on human beings. As for "crazy ignorant cronies," I hope that you realize that the "Mark of the Beast" comment something called sarcasm. I don't understand what your last sentence means.

    5. Re:Absolutely Not by epistemiclife · · Score: 1

      It's not a "we don't even know argument." It is a simple observation: namely, that placing foreign objects into the brain could maybe -- just maybe -- have side effects. I don't see why this is so difficult to understand, or so laughable as to warrant such biting facetiousness. Or perhaps you people are simply mean-spirited.

    6. Re:Absolutely Not by epistemiclife · · Score: 1

      Here's a link, highlighting the fact that I mentioned earlier: that there is not a scientific consensus on the issue of cell phones: http://www.chicagotribune.com/technology/chi-07021 8radiation-story,1,4538371.story?page=2&track=rss Again, I don't know who you think "[I] and [my] crazy[,] ignorant cronies" are, but I was kindly suggest that you question your assumptions, and, perhaps, learn to discuss something without using ridiculous ad hominem attacks. It is counterproductive. Some people with whom you disagree may, in fact, actually be smarter and/or more educated than you are.

  47. Several Scifi shows have demonstrated this. by davonshire · · Score: 1

    Ok a bit on the trivia side. But first the article talks about head bands perhaps someday for non impared people. And this kind of thing was demonstrated in Sliders, (the newer) Outer Limits, as well as probably a a few dozen movies Saturn 5 for instance.

    You'll have all the conspiracy people talking up about how it will be easier to control the masses, about people becoming fatter and less physically conditioned etc. But you will almost not hear about the following.

    The social disconnect that people experience just in emails and forums should indicate the social damage you are risking creating a device that even takes typing away and makes communication just act of mental activity. Because of the disconnect, people react much more visciously with flame wars, tirades, rants. Extreme responses that generally would not be demonstrated in public or direct personal contact with the other party/s.

    And so I say, even if there were ways to check against the decay of physical body, personal privacy and general sanity. Socially such a thing would cause great upheavals. Because when something becomes so simple as thinking a message and sending it off, you lose the best most important filter that gives us a chance to be civil and diplomatic and even charming. Time.

    Just a few thoughts may your cranium beep with pleasure.

  48. Wheres my damn datajack? by Orclover · · Score: 4, Funny

    Serriously where the hell is it? I'ts 07 and I dont have a flying car, monkey buttler or datajack to plug my head directly into a computer! WTF man? In a few years I am going to turn 40, if I cant take "cybering" to a whole new level or braindump into halo 5 with full virtual sensory control then why the hell are we even bothering with new technology. We are waaay the hell behind in this crap from where we should be. Hell by 2020 I need to be able to ditch my meat corpse permenantly and become a ghost in a datastream somewhere enjoying all the world wide web until a wayward asteroid ends the party for the whole planet.

    I got a schedule here people!

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. -Fight Club
  49. I'm looking forward to it with anticipation. by rizole · · Score: 1

    After all, voice recognition and optical character recognition are already such ubiquitous and transparently seamless technologies that brain wave recognition is likely to be a resounding success.

  50. no, you fools, wrong Russia joke! by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The only drawback with these computers is you have to think in Russian." See? Much funnier reference. :)

    And on-topic, there's some totally amazing shit going down in cybernetics these days.

    http://www.sigmorobot.com/technology/news/toast_bi onic_man.htm

    This guy here has thought-controlled limbs. The nerves that controlled his arms have been rewired into muscles in his pecs and the arm reads the twitches there and turns that into motion.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5140090.stm

    Limbs can now be attached directly to the skeleton.

    Artificial muscles (sorry btech fans, they aren't called myomar)

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4817848.stm

    Advanced bionic hand

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4225896.stm

    Article featuring Claudia Mitchell as well as Jesse Sullivan, both real-life cyborgs

    http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,2 0457094-8362,00.html

    We're really making some fantastic advances in this field. The major future hurtles will be better feedback from the limb, getting it to run on blood glucose so a separate power supply is not needed, and making the whole affair less bulky and more natural. The ideal goal here would be a limb that would pass for perfectly natural, both for the observer and the amputee.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:no, you fools, wrong Russia joke! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic I know but from the first link "It hopes the work - which is to be published in the Journal of Anatomy - may help survivors of the 7 July bombings, as well as other amputees." what exactly is wrong with just saying amputees is there really a need to reference terrorism!

  51. Bastards! by nick_davison · · Score: 1

    the article extrapolates out to a near future in which we will all be wearing headband computers and IM'ing one another as if telepathically This to going to totally mush the edges of my tinfoil hat!
  52. Oblig: by RedElf · · Score: 1

    It's it's the mark of the beast!

    --
    You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads!
  53. Tag: oldnews by Xiph · · Score: 1

    this story is from july LAST year, please apply the tag "oldnews"

    --
    Blah blah sig blah blah blah irony blah blah
    1. Re:Tag: oldnews by Draconnery · · Score: 1

      Even worse, I could have written the entire article summary (minus the "2 years ago" part, obviously) near the end of Fall 2004, when I wrote a paper (for maybe the lamest class ever) about implants like this.

      And yes, the article date just makes this even more pathetic. Superlame.

  54. someone has to say it by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  55. Jacking off will be more important by cyberianpan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As is many people, especially those engaging on /. connect in a bit to much. Daily we've x personal emails, y phone conversations & z page impressions & these numbers are all getting higher. Our attention spans break down from 40 --> 30 --> ... 5 mins in such environments as is.

    Being persistently connected at a cognitive level might be dangerous -
    we will start processing informational subliminally if over-loaded & yes for example this could lead to brainwashing...

    certainly tiring ...

    it would force us to structure our days better & jack out entirely even during work just to escape the buzzing, but not all will- if we've information / net addicts with the crude i/o devices of today what will come in 20 years ?

    1. Re:Jacking off will be more important by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      But...the kittens!

    2. Re:Jacking off will be more important by C0y0t3 · · Score: 1

      Jacking off is pretty important already, don't you think?

      Damn the kittens!

    3. Re:Jacking off will be more important by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      I think you meant 'Jacking Out' there, chief.

  56. Yes but, by sirindex · · Score: 0

    Will we be able to play Duke Nukem Forever with this?

  57. uhm... by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    does this mean that my boss will read, what I really think about him?

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  58. Re:That means there will be an electronic device.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hacking? ....and viruses, too.

    See references to Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex.

  59. New startup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have just submitted a bunch of provisional patent applications, aiming to "spam filter" my thoughts, context and contact sensitive adult content filtering included. It's actually simple, it's done by the computer, not me.

    I always wanted to do programming without writing a single line of code, anyway. I would think of the application, as it works. The computer would then determine the best programming language for the imagined application, quickly create a prototype, which would be refined by the computer, just as I am using in imagination the more and more improved version of the application.

    Ooopps, this has got to be patented as well.

    Life is just getting cooler and cooler.

  60. A new wave of viruses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought about the attachments in my inbox. . .and now my brain is infected with 94 variants of MyDoom.

  61. uh Sure... by makoffee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That all sounds great but can you imagine trying to tech support that? "You say you can't get to your email? Have you tried thinking about it?" In reality the learning curve of your average desktop user may never allow this.

    At best I see something like this working just about as well as current voice recognition software.

    --
    -makoffee
    1. Re:uh Sure... by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Think of it as evolution in action. If you want food, you need to order it via the mind interface. If you are too stupid, you die.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  62. Re:That means there will be an electronic device.. by superdan2k · · Score: 1

    One would assume that the commands issued would be more like a (non-force feedback) joystick -- outbound traffic only. You'd get your results by looking at the screen. I can't imagine that anyone would want to have information dumped into their brain via this, given that the information would only be basic and used to stimulate certain areas of the brain. (Yes, yes, stimulate my pleasure centers while using Excel. Gah.)

    --
    blog |
  63. So What? by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Twitter, read "Reflections on Trusting Trust" [no link provided]. Now. Free software doesn't provide full protection.

    Thanks, I have read that before. So what? The point of free software is that you don't have to trust, you can see and verify for yourself. The learning compiler example is disturbing but not very. If you are really paranoid, you can start from scratch and toggle switches yourself. A less crazy method is to cross up distributions. Compile things from one distribution with another. Finally, you can simply trust the people at gnu.org and everyone using the tool chain that has not noticed problems. At the end of the day, free software still wins. You have every ability non free does and many more to validate what you think you have. People in the non free world are stuck trusting people who have violated that trust again and again.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:So What? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Unless you write the compilers from scratch, and use it to compile itself, you can never fully trust the end result.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:So What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I program in assembly language, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:So What? by pr0xie · · Score: 1

      Then you must trust the CPU instruction set built into the x86?

      And most of those chips are built overseas!!!

  64. Jump to conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep seeing all these posts about people refusing to have something implanted in thier brains. The article talks about the future of the tech having not only implants, but moving to a device worn on the head like a band... sans implant. This I could live with, but I'm also investing in whatever company comes up with the mental firewall software, not only to keep others out, but to keep my thoughts in... what kind of world would it be if your co-workers knew what you /really/ thought about them...

  65. one-way control by amigabill · · Score: 1

    All work -- emails, spreadsheets, and Google searches -- will be performed by mind control.

    Let's just hope it stays a one-way connetion. I don't want someone hacking into my brain and making me do stuff...

    1. Re:one-way control by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You mean someone else?

      Don't think that way, you're the one that posted this.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  66. You lazy kids... by Namlak · · Score: 1

    ...back in my day we had to LOGIN to school. And LOGOUT , too! Typing, with both hands each way!

  67. Pink Elephants by kalirion · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey Bob, whatever you do, don't think about reformatting the hard drive and being sure that you want to do it!

    1. Re:Pink Elephants by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      In the future, computers fsck YOU!

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
  68. Do we really need this? by GiantMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the profs at my school who works on neural prostheses for para/quadriplegics, has pointed out that this technology could very well be overkill. He showed us a video of someone with neural implants controlling a computer compared to someone using one of those mouses mounted on someones head who can use eye blinks as mouse clicks. The neural implants were far slower and couldn't produce smooth motions at all (the man was trying to sketch something with mspaint) whereas with a head mounted mouse the user was able to play a game of solitaire without problems. Granted, this was a very primitive implant that likely can be improved a lot, but is it worth the hundreds of thousands of dollars per patient right now for barely functional neural implants when we have a simpler, cheaper, more reliable, less dangerous solution?

    1. Re:Do we really need this? by Jott42 · · Score: 1

      True. For ordinary computer control there is not that much to gain for most patients, especially as a computer mouse essentially is a 2 DOF device, plus the click. But if we look at harder things, such as controlling limbs with multiple degrees of freedom (an arm, without the fingers and palm, has 7 to start with) at the same time, or restoring hearing and vision, we need to interact directly with the nervous system. Which is exactly what is done today, when we restore hearing with cochlear implants. These have electrodes that directly stimulates the auditory nerve. The simple experiments you see today is due to the technology being in its infancy, they are not the target application.

    2. Re:Do we really need this? by Verte · · Score: 0

      We can think about /entire/ three dimensional objects, though. There's replacing the mouse, and then there's more. For example, you could use such a computer to hold thoughts, you know when it all zips by so fast? Like when you're trying to paint and you get part of the picture here and part there... it could record all the parts and let you modify large sections of the image in real time. Of course, something the size of an aspirin won't allow you to capture an entire image from the visual cortex or read it back, but I'm not certain external brainwave monitors will be able to get that sort of resolution.

      --
      We at slashdot are scientists, specialists and kernel hackers. Your FUD will be found out.
    3. Re:Do we really need this? by GiantMonkey · · Score: 1

      The thing that makes the cochlear implants work though from my understanding is that they are able to function without high numbers of extremely tightly packed electrodes. I believe the high end ones only have 20 or so electrodes in total. I agree that more difficult tasks require input directly from the nervous system, but there are quite a few difficulties in recording arrays that need to be overcome before we'll start to see your full manipulation of an artificial arm. It just seems to me that declaring that the best use we have for these neural arrays is to control a computer is a bit ridiculous. I'm pretty sure if I was in that situation with a recording array stuck in my brain that I would ask them to hook it up to an arm or hand so rather than getting some crappy mouse movements that I could have some basic functions back.

  69. Re:That means there will be an electronic device.. by CaptainPatent · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying information will be dumped in by any means. The sensor works by reacting to brain waves. The chip will then propagate to an electronic device which, regardless of the actual desired output, will create an electronic signature. I'm foreseeing a problem existing when people begin to read the device's signature (similar to the CRT and LCD screen reproduction through walls which has been seen on slashdot before) Even though it is only used for a channel change or a video game controller, there may be certain electronic signatures created for different moods and thoughts. If someone were to make such a device there's a chance they may be able to spy on your every thought.

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
  70. You can read minds eh? by SlashDev · · Score: 0

    Read this (...)

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
  71. Mental Spellchecker by Quietly+Amused · · Score: 1

    Would be interesting to see whether "mental typing" would eliminate spelling and grammatical errors, or whether it would show that poor spellers and poor grammarians would continue to do so. Yes, an auto-spell checker could eliminate both poor spelling and grammar, but would be unworkable because that would A)prevent us using non-standard words for emphasis, and B) restrict sentence structure to a pre-defined set of parameters, totally destroying personal expression, as anyone who has stared incredulously at the utter bloody nonsense that Word Spellcheck comes out with on occasion.

    1. Re:Mental Spellchecker by Quietly+Amused · · Score: 1

      ...would be able to testify to! Note to self, make sure that you have typed the entire sentence before pressing "send", especially when typing about spelling and grammar!!! :-)

    2. Re:Mental Spellchecker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or whether it would show that poor spellers and poor grammarians would continue to do so

      Yes.

  72. Most wrist pain "from keyboards" is caused by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    incorrect use of keyboards!

    Get touch-typing lessons. Yes, lessons. Or that awful "mavis beacon" program. There is a right way and a wrong way to type. One key indicator (as pointed out in a recent emacs thread): if you use the same hand to press a key and hold down a modifier, YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG. There is a reason you have two shifts, two ctrls, two alts - it's so that you can press shift with your right hand when typing a "left hand letter", and shift with your left hand when typing a "right hand letter". And so on.

    This means that your wrists are pretty much straight at all times. And if you've small hands, and need to "stretch" to reach a key - don't! Move your arm instead. And your wrists should never touch the table - holding your hands tilted upward and moving your fingers is just idiotic, keepy your fingers after the first nuckle somewhat below wrist level at all times when typing. Wrist "rests" are extremely damaging, unless you're actually just resting against them in between bursts of typing. I've seen people lean their wrists on the rests and type -that will knacker your wrists in a matter of months.

    The trouble is, "playing" the keyboard correctly, like playing the piano correctly, is highly unlikely to be the "natural" way your body will seize upon to do it if you just sit down and start pressing stuff. It may feel very unnatural, but I was taught to type properly in school (the only boy in a secretarial class...), and I've been typing for 20 YEARS without any pain.

    Helps to buy quality keyboards too - nowadays see e.g. http://pckeyboard.com/ or http://cherry.de/

  73. Does this mean.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If one of us shuts down, we all shut down?

  74. How mind-controlled computers could work by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 0

    I belong to a sci-fi / philosophy club. There a guy showed us a sketch of a mind-controlled OS. It was a combination of commandline plus drop-down menus. The motor was focused on typing and some auxiliary buttons. Type in some predefined commands (with your mind), and the computer does everything. In fact, it could be a plugin for your favorite GUI OS.

    1. Re:How mind-controlled computers could work by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, for this to work in the real world, the system would HAVE to understand multiple contexts, inflection, and be able to dynamically determine other formatting. Also, if the mind is doing it, you no longer need menus or drop downs.
      You just think 'Save' or highlight.

      no, here is the kicker:
      If we can do this, we know longer need documents, just record the brain patters, then when someone wants that information, it reads it into the brain.
      Well, probably a buffer that you can the 'know' the document.

      If it is really good, then it could store the document in the head chip and you could recall it when ever you want.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  75. Wait by extrasolar · · Score: 1

    What're the hamsters for?

  76. Wishful Thinking by fhage · · Score: 1
    Watch a pianist play a complex piece. Now try to imagine trying to communicate the information necessary to duplicate the performance via a Brain-Computer interface. Unless the interface can rival the complexity and capacity of our brains connections to our hands, it will never be able to outperform the manipulation of things with our fingers. Although typing or playing a piano is a learned skill, evolution has pre-wired our brains to make these amazing feats possible.

    I can easily imagine a brain interface having hundreds of inputs, but unless we can find a way to attach them to specific nerves, performing specific functions, control will always be clumsy. Our brain is really not that good at re-wiring our physical control circuitry. It does happen, but the degree of control is much less that what was originally hard-wired in.

    Brain-Computer interfacing is more likely to provide comparable capabilities by connecting to the body's peripheral nervous system, not to the brain itself. I see the possibilities of wiring into the nerves of a severed limb, but until we can design and grow biological structures, all we're going to get is very simple, slow and limited interfaces.

  77. Brain spam by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Pretty soon, we'll have direct to brain spam and adware. Be careful and don't install an implant that runs Windows or you will be shut down when WGA can't phone home to Redmond...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  78. yep. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Unless you write the compilers from scratch, and use it to compile itself, you can never fully trust the end result.

    That's what I meant by "toggle switches" - litterally toggle machine code to make the compiler. It's a little over the top to think that the "cat" command could be compromised but there's only one way to be sure. Six decades later, you would have something that you and no one else can trust.

    I'll stick with GNU.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  79. Cinema Paradiso by xtracto · · Score: 1

    Technology advances always arrive late...

    I hope it is not the case for the great Prof. Hawkins... people like him might benefit from this...

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    1. Re:Cinema Paradiso by jonnyelectronic · · Score: 1

      I presume you mean _Hawking_ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking (Fear not you're not the first, I hear it all the time, it's one of those things where it's said incorrectly once and everyone repeats it)

  80. This dream ... by slackarse · · Score: 1

    ... brought to you by Lightspeed Briefs.

    --
    Come to Australia so we can strip search you and rob you of your internets, pr0n, rights and freedoms.
  81. Getting technical by xinjiang77 · · Score: 1

    Will computers be able to interpret the emotion of laughter and automatically type "lol" or some such as the user experiences this emotion? Will they be able to interpret emotion correctly?

  82. Re:Most wrist pain "from keyboards" is caused by.. by mqduck · · Score: 1

    For the record, I type fast and learned entirely by myself (and unintentionally). I use the same button for shift and another letter all the time. My fingers and wrists never get tired or sore. I've been told I have good posture, but that was unintentional as well. Not trying to show you up or anything, but you just state that all so matter-of-factually.

    --
    Property is theft.
  83. Godsend. by DarkLegacy · · Score: 1

    Controlling devices with the mind is just the beginning. Next, Wolf believes, is what he calls "network-enabled telepathy" - instant thought transfer. In other words, your thoughts will flow from your brain over the network right into someone else's brain. If you think instant messaging is addictive, just wait for instant thinking.


    This is a godsend for us D&D players. Imagine, you no longer have to intricately describe the environment to your players, you simply visualize it and they are inside of it.
    My god, we'll forget about reality and be living in the dreamworld 24/7.

    ... *begins to cry*
    --
    127.0.0.1
  84. It will take off when it can be done noninvasively by mark-t · · Score: 1

    When the technology exists to build sensors into headgear that is not uncomfortable to wear and is quick and easy to don and remove, I can see this sort of thing becoming very mainstream.

    I'm not that worried about what this would do to the brain because it is an input device, not an output device (although that may be up and coming... and you can bet anything that the first commercial application for it will be porn).

  85. Microsoft Announces Windows TP by rajkiran_g · · Score: 1

    From http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article09-121

    Microsoft Announces Beta Release Of Windows TP

    REDMOND WA (JAN 13) BUSINESS WIRE - Microsoft Corp announced Thursday that a beta release of Windows TP, the telepathic operating system, was released to 1,500 test sites worldwide.

    Developed using the soon-to-be released Microsoft C for Neurons, Windows TP bypasses awkward user interfaces by interacting directly with the user's brain. Using Microsoft MindMouse, users can visualize images in their mind, and the application associated with that image (or "thought icon") is executed. Users can visualize pictures to create Windows Bitmap images, or think text directly into Windows applications. Windows TP is fully compatible with all previous versions of Windows.

    Data stored under Windows TP can be copied into the user's short-term memory (the Windows TP Clipboard), or transferred directly into the user's long-term memory using Windows' new 32-bit Direct Neuron Access technology. Users can then plug into other Windows TP systems to transfer data.

    Microsoft also announced the first application developed exclusively for Windows TP. CyberMail is a mental mail system designed to transfer messages by thought. Users visualize the person or company logo they want to send a message to, followed by the message to send. Microsoft has had a beta version of the application in use for several months.

    CONTACT: Microsoft Corporation, Liz Wagthor, 206-555-8080 (CyberMail address: A shorth dumpy lady with shiny red hair and a really gross mole growing on the right side of her lip). A blue tattoo on her right arm that says "Billy G.'s the Man for Me"

    Testers Report Problems With Windows TP Beta

    NEW YORK, Apr 1, Reuter - Microsoft's new Windows TP has a long way to go before final release, say beta testers of the product.

    Testers report numerous problems with the thought icons included with the product. "I can see a fish tail representing some useful things, but the Program Manager? It's just not intuitive", says Clyde Revlon, an MIS specialist with McBalmy, Crain, and Larch. "Whoever came up with these thought icons needs therapy. I'm sure the guy's Yorkshire terrier is wonderful, but as the File Manager? A golden retriever I could understand. And that sweater the terrier is wearing, it's just too loud. Let me control the sweater."

    Testers also report dangerous corruption problems with the Direct Neuron Access technology. "Colors, I smell colors. Dog, good dog, go to the light mom", said Maggie Ferreaux, a consultant with Sharp, Trenchant, and Blunt Computer Services.

    Other testers were less understanding. "I'm working on a presentation, and suddenly, all I can think about is pages "A" through "C" of the Miami telephone directory. It took me three hours to get it out of my mind. That blows my productivity right out of the water", says Max Pirenich, a salesman for Carp Technology. "Just thinking about Excel scares the crap out of me."

    Microsoft officials acknowledged the issues, citing that no beta release of a product is perfect, and vowed to provide testers with the services of the same Neurologist that helped Microsoft Quality Assurance recover from testing the product in its early stages. Many Microsoft QA engineers are expected to live long, productive lives.

    Bugs Found During Testing Of Windows TP (In No Particular Order)

    * There's a HUGE problem with DOUBLESPACE.

    The left and right sides of the brain can no longer communicate with each other, and the Corpus Collusum (the part connecting the two brain hemispheres) begins to deteriorate.

    * Users of Windows TP at IBM are being admitted to local asylum for treatment - prognosis is not promising.

    An unknown virus is suspected, and doctor's are baffled by it's mutigenic characterisitcs and the fact that the individuals keep writing "Your system is not stoned. Legalize Marijuana."

    *

  86. This should be forbidden anywhere on the planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My poor Krell!

    After a million years
    of shining sanity...

    they could hardly have understood
    what power was destroying them.

  87. Government by vipernicus · · Score: 1

    So, when will it become legal to mind tap to search for terrorism?

  88. Monsters from the Id by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The plot of Forbidden Planet -- possibly the best SF movie to ever come out of the 50's -- had in the Planet of the Krell (first major Rotoscope production too iirc) the concept that the original inhabitants had destroyed themselves after they'd learned to control their planet's engines by their minds alone. "Monsters from the Id" complained Dr. Morbius; their innermost desires controlled the engines of destruction, bypassing the conscious censors.

    Another point of view is the decadent society of Moorcock's "Dancers at the End of Time" where mind control of engines of construction and destruction led to a global ennui where all forward motion of society had ceased.

    The very best of these in terms of simple imagery is I believe Alan Dean Foster's short story "With Friends Like These..." which still sends shivers down my back, and is possibly the only modern-era short story to match the best of the Golden Era SF for star quality.

    So what will it all lead to, sports? Will we build something amazing, huge and new with these mind-driven machines, or will we simply amuse ourselves to death?

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  89. Identity theft via thought sniffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing nobody has mentioned is the inherent security issues with this. I don't mean hemoraging in your brain due to the implant, but the computer end of things. Let's look into the future a bit, shall we...

    It's 2017. About half of the population of the world has these implants. They allow the person to communicate with their computer if it is within a 5 foot range. You have one too. Now, let's say you go and sit down at a cafe, and a stranger walks up and gets a cup of coffee too. This stranger is a hacker and, being that he is one, has just recently cracked the WEP-like encryption used on your implant. He can now "thought sniff" your thoughts (like packet sniffing) and he now knows things such as your SSN, your DOB, and worse still, he has the capability to thought sniff the recid card number from your card as you handed it to the clerk at the checkout counter when you bought your coffee. You go and sit sown and he sits down a few feet from you, all the while capturing your thoughts and - obviously - transmitting them to his own laptop so he doesn't have to actually remember them. He captures an email to your boss about a huge, yet secret project (which he can sell to your competition) and the fact that you're getting a big bonus in 6 days (so he knows exactly when to take all your money). He's able to capture your entire life for nothing more than the cost of a cup of coffee. Of course, he now has access to everything you know, and he can go and get credit cards, drivers licenses, and more in your name. Worse still, things such as your mother's maiden name or first grade teacher or favorite pet/color/food aren't a secret to him, and so he can get into all the old system that only require passwords.

    Of course, I don't like suggesting problems without solutions, so here's mine - don't use an implant, use a plug. To be specific, use something that serves the same function as a USB Wifi adapter. Implant a universal interface and then plug in the hardware with the actual wireless radio only when you need it. Basically, give people the ability to turn the damn thing off without having to have it surgically removed.

    So I guess I'm just saying that I support this idea, but I agree, it's inherently dangerous, and I'd really, really prefer to make it removable.

  90. Controlling computers without sensors by prat393 · · Score: 1

    There are a choice few people out there working on the NEXT next wave: computers that operate directly through power of mind, without even any biological-based sensors. Check out Interchange Lab and look into the research published by PEAR on quantum random event generators.

  91. Sleeping users? by Dersaidin · · Score: 1

    If/when that technology becomes available, it'd be interesting to see what a variety of programs might do if hooked up to someone who is asleep. Perhaps it'd be usefull for Psychiatrists (or Psychologists?).

  92. Jeopardy! by obeythefist · · Score: 1

    Someday, keyboards and computer mice will be remembered only as medieval-style torture devices for the wrists. All work -- emails, spreadsheets, and Google searches -- will be performed by mind control.

    What is hyperbole?

    I win!

    Oh good lordy that was some mighty fine hyperbole. We'll run computers with our minds the same day I hop in my flying car, buzz up to the floating city in the clouds, eat my lunch (in pill form) served to me by bipedal servant robot with an AI indistinguishable from a human then get whisked along the moving footpath to sit around all day talking on my video-phone, playing Duke Nukem' Forever, and dictating letters to my computer.

    Some technologies do not eventuate because they are not practical, even if they are fanciful.

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  93. Tone down the alarmism, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Output from motor cortex by reading local potentials of some kind *in no way* implies input back into the brain. Further, we're lucky to get 5-6 degrees of freedom in our output right now. Enough to play a videogame or control a single robot arm, not enough to 'communicate telepathetically.' It's not even clear that that sort of wide recording chronic implant is even possible.

  94. dangerous meme ? by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

    A virus in your mind... well, that's called religion. You could be already immune to it, hopefully.

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  95. AquaThought Mindset by benow · · Score: 1

    The AquaThought Mindset is a 16 channel eeg with scsi output. Would make for some fine neurofeedback immersive noodling.

  96. Practical! by gacl · · Score: 1

    Cool! Now i can watch all my porn without having to reach for the keyboard or the mouse.

  97. Just remember by ridgecritter · · Score: 1

    the Krell, and how they ended.

  98. Hugh? I am already doing that! by mpiktas · · Score: 1

    What is so interesting about controling computer with your brain? Everybody does that with the help of hands, yes, but if you take out the brain from the equation, we are just monkeys bashing the keyboard. Shakespear may come out, or not.

  99. Relax... by furbearntrout · · Score: 1

    Relax.
    Plug in.
    Join the collective.

    Resistance is futile.
    Our victory is inevitable.

    --
    Crap. What did the new CSS do with the "Post anonymously" option??
  100. But most important will be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... jerking off.

  101. Steam engines by asninn · · Score: 1

    Someday, keyboards and computer mice will be remembered only as medieval-style torture devices for the wrists. All work -- emails, spreadsheets, and Google searches -- will be performed by mind control.

    Every time I read naive extrapolations like that, I'm reminded of a painting I once saw - I'm not sure anymore who did it, but it was done when steam engines were first invented, and it showed the artist's vision of the future, where everything was being done with steam - driving, flying, even walking (!). It was an incredibly naive extrapolation of existing technology (steam engines) into the future, combined with a "soon, everything will be done with X" attitude, and that's exactly what I'm seeing here, too.

    Just saying.

    --
    butter the donkey
  102. Virii by n3tcat · · Score: 1

    First it's Brain-controlled-computers. Next comes Computer-enhanced-brains.

    And then we gotta deal with the hackers *sigh*

  103. Thinking in Russian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that's true, I'll probably gotta switch to Opera.

  104. Seems like payback. by VinB · · Score: 0

    I contended for a while now that our computer has been controlling the brains of my kids. Finally there's some hope that we might be able to tip the tables.

  105. torture? by bobsalt · · Score: 1

    But just think of the advantages. In the office of the future, the conference call, too, will be remembered as a medieval form of torture."


    I think that now....

  106. But the question has to be posed by LuxMaker · · Score: 1

    How long before we control brains with computers?

    --
    I regret that I only have one mod point to give per post.
  107. Foolish assumptions by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 1

    Someday, keyboards and computer mice will be remembered only as medieval-style torture devices for the wrists. All work -- emails, spreadsheets, and Google searches -- will be performed by mind control. He is foolish in assuming that everyone's mind functions 'normal' enough to have necessary control. A large percentage of people have some type of mental problems. A person that has epilepsy, even relatively minor partial-seizures that only affect part of the brain will disrupt thought and control enough that mental interfaces to the computer would become useless. If a person has other disorders (such as certain types of schizophrenia) that affect the way the brain functions control could become extremely limited. Then finally, you have the people that have had some sort of brain trauma. There are cases in which a person's brain has adapted to carry out functions in different parts of the brain when a particular part was damaged. If the brain functions in a fundamentally different way, the controls will be useless. In other words, physical controls such as the mouse and keyboard (or other physical devices that replace them on future computers) will not ever disappear.

    -My two pennies.
  108. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To control firefox, you will have to think in russian...

  109. 13th Floor by uolamer · · Score: 1

    ya it is a shame, I liked the basic idea of 13th floor a lot better myself.

    --
    s/©//g
  110. Old news by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    My brain has been interfacing with computers forever. In fact I was born with two digital brain-computer interfaces.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace