Slashdot Mirror


Gigabyte N680SLI-DQ6 - A Mother Of A Motherboard

MojoKid writes "Motherboards manufacturers seem to get more exotic in their designs, with each new chipset release. HotHardware has an evaluation posted looking at the Gigabyte GA-N680SLI-DQ6; a product that seemingly out does every other current desktop motherboard in a number of key areas. The board features four Gigabit LAN controllers, 10 SATA ports, a 12-phase power array, 100% solid-state capacitors, and a unique wrap-around, passive, cooling apparatus that cools both the top and underside of the chipset and CPU socket area. And because the board is based on NVIDIA's nForce 680i SLI chipset, it also has three full-length PCI Express x16 slots for multi-GPU support. It's a good overclocker and performed well throughout the benchmarks."

291 comments

  1. But... by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...does it go to Eleven?

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:But... by KillerCow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... does it run linux?

    2. Re:But... by CelticWhisper · · Score: 2, Informative

      And how much more blue could they make that silicon? The answer is none. None more blue.

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    3. Re:But... by cstdenis · · Score: 1, Funny

      Will it blend?

      --
      1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual.
    4. Re:But... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Informative

      The summary is wrong, as anyone who looked at the front page of the article could tell you.

      2 PCI Express x16 slots
      1 PCI Express x8 slot
      1 PCI Express x1 slot
      3 PCI slots

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    5. Re:But... by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 1

      Ye, But you'll need to break it up a bit first. That's cheating.

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    6. Re:But... by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      TFA gets it wrong too: "And did we mention the board is based on NVIDIA's nForce 680i SLI chipset and has three full length, PCI Express x16 slots for multi-GPU action?"

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    7. Re:But... by langelgjm · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, the summary is correct. I thought it was wrong too, though, until I looked at the photograph of the PCB: http://www.hothardware.com/articles/Gigabyte_GAN68 0SLIDQ6/?page=2

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    8. Re:But... by sharkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...a 12-phase power array...

      It goes PAST eleven.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    9. Re:But... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      No, the summary and article were both correct. It's just that PCIe is more complicated because the "xN" nomenclature can refer to the electrical and physical properties separately.

      In other words, the slot in question is physically x16 (i.e., an x16 card will fit) but electrically x8 (i.e., a card in that slot would only get x8 bandwidth).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    10. Re:But... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      No. Blendtec doesn't make a big enough blender to fit it in. Instead, the proper question to ask is "Will it chip ?"

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:But... by TrevorB · · Score: 2, Funny

      What, no ISA slots?

      Worthless!

    12. Re:But... by EricTheGreen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ladies and gentlemen, presenting the latest, greatest Slashdot meme!

      It is funnier, at least, than imagining a you-know-what cluster of them...

    13. Re:But... by jhines · · Score: 1

      More interesting would be Solaris. ZFS to do the raid on the SATA drives, mixing and matching across the different on board raid chips, and 4 lan ports, it would make a great server.

    14. Re:But... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Where's my MCA?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    15. Re:But... by MojoKid · · Score: 1

      Uh no, you're wrong. Correct, the third X16 slot has a X8 electrical connection BUT it's a full length X16 slot, mechanically, just like the post says.

    16. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 3 x16 slots, just the middle one is only wired for x8. You can put an x16 card in that slot and it will work just fine.

    17. Re:But... by adrian727 · · Score: 1

      Will it blend? After they tried with Cubic Zirconium, I don't think that's a question anymore. Still, the size does matter, they can't blend a crowbar.
    18. Re:But... by lar3ry · · Score: 1

      It's a floor wax that is ALSO a dessert topping!

      --
      "May I have ten thousand marbles, please?"
    19. Re:But... by Tim+Doran · · Score: 1

      I got your MCA right here!

      Seriously, I'm typing this on a PS/2 Mod 95...

    20. Re:But... by Megatog615 · · Score: 1

      Oh God that'd be more painful than that iPhone blend video. Painful as in the $600 loss, not the iPhone loss. But the again buying an iPhone is also equally painful.

    21. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No ISAs? Weak.

    22. Re:But... by hjf · · Score: 1

      model 95 computer eh? with a matching UID and all.

    23. Re:But... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a floor wax or an aphrodesiac...

      If it leaves a waxy yellow build-up on ANYTHING, Garibaldi's coming back here...

    24. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude! you got the open sores bit right, but then messed it up with Linsucks. It should have been Lunix. Trolls these days.

    25. Re:But... by Keruo · · Score: 1

      How are marvell drivers for solaris?

      On linux those marvell chips seem to drop more packets than santa claus on christmas eve.

      --
      There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    26. Re:But... by countach · · Score: 1

      But can Cowboy Neal blend a Beowulf cluster of them?

      That is the question.

    27. Re:But... by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      in soviet russia a beowulf cluster blends YOU!

    28. Re:But... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      So it's not an x16 is it? It's an x8.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    29. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which chipset? The Yukon1 (skge) should be fine. I can imagine having problems with the Yukon2 because the newer sky2 driver is still being developed. Have you tried the vendor-supplied sk98lin driver instead?

    30. Re:But... by cortana · · Score: 1

      I'm sure $600 is a small part of Blendtec's marketing budget.

    31. Re:But... by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Yes until the capacitors explode.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    32. Re:But... by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      the Supermicro P4SCA is a p4 board with an ISA slot, though it's socket 478.. I don't know of any S775 boards with ISA.

      I use two of them, one is in a CMM setup, where it was going to cost $7000 for a PCI version of the ISA controller board.

      The other runs a Hayes Optima Synchronous modem, where finding a PCI version was going to be more expensive than the extra cost of the motherboard.

      The motherboard costs around 500 dollars a few years back, seems to be around 250 now.

    33. Re:But... by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      Parent +1 Insightful. ;-)

      --Look into Nexenta, they're doing great things w/ Opensolaris + GNU Userland.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    34. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are both references to the SNL skit.

  2. What is a power array? by __aaabsi3154 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I recognize most of that stuff, but what is a 12-phase power array?

    1. Re:What is a power array? by doombringerltx · · Score: 1

      Imagine a normal power array but instead with 12 phases. DUH!

    2. Re:What is a power array? by Applekid · · Score: 1

      I misread that then. I thought it had a 12 phaser power array to vaporize my enemies.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    3. Re:What is a power array? by hcdejong · · Score: 5, Informative

      This refers to the power regulator onboard - i.e. internal to the motherboard itself; it's nothing to do with the 240v PSU.

      The onboard power regulator is the part of the motherboard which converts the standard 3.3v to the exact voltages the CPU, RAM, etc require. The theory goes that the more phases, the cooler running, more efficient and more reliable the motherboard will be (but it's mostly about e-penis, rather than any genuine advantage).

    4. Re:What is a power array? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-phase

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_converter

      useful for running four AC motors in parallel without having their inductive load mess with each other.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RL_circuit

      Given that a motherboard is a DC system, I have no idea what that would be useful for.

    5. Re:What is a power array? by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      Be careful! Even if you're seeing predictable phase arrays, you still might end up with a resonance cascade scenario.

    6. Re:What is a power array? by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      Bah. I don't think I'll ever see a resonance cascade--

      --you'll have to excuse me. I have to go wait for someone...in the test chamber.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    7. Re:What is a power array? by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1, Funny

      I recognize most of that stuff, but what is a 12-phase power array?

      It's next to the deflector dish and is usually the 2nd thing to be re-aligned when trying to solve some complex, physically impossible, life threatening problem.

      "In four hours the ship blows up" -- Scotty (The Savage Curtain)

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    8. Re:What is a power array? by Andy_R · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are too stupid to understand nature's simultaneous 12-phase powercube! Cubic Creation of 4 corner separate simultaneous 12 phase Days within 1 Earth rotation - transcends and contradicts the 1 Day rotation and all ONEism / Singularity religions - proving them to constitute Evil on Earth for the parallel Opposites. No god equals 4 corner stages of metamorphic rotating humanity - as a baby, child, parent and grandparent evolution of motherboards! I offer you $10,000.00 to disprove math that 1 rotation of 4 Earth quadrants within the 4 quarter Harmonic Time Cube does create 12 simultaneous 24 hr power phases!

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    9. Re:What is a power array? by hobbesmaster · · Score: 1

      That still doesn't explain how you get different phases out of a DC signal.

      I'm assuming they mean something else. Or, more likely, its bullshit like audiophile cables designed to minimize the skin effect, cable burn in devices or power factor correction stuff for your house.

    10. Re:What is a power array? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There is real practical value in breaking it up into phases, not just theoretical.

      Note: I've done multi-phase power work, but it has been a while.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:What is a power array? by dfsmith · · Score: 1

      Is that regular hours or sidereal hours?

    12. Re:What is a power array? by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

      See Multi-phase Buck converters in Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_converter#Multip hase_Buck

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    13. Re:What is a power array? by RevRigel · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have to take issue here. "n"-phase power supplies in motherboard parlance refer to different Buck-style switching regulator setups. A basic Buck regulator turns on a MOSFET (generally) to switch current into an inductor and capacitor, with a diode in parallel (you can google buck topology if you like). Thus, as the power drains out of the capacitor into the load, the switcher recharges it with little sips of current every couple of microseconds, resulting in a stable voltage from the point of view of the load. MOSFETs have a fairly hard limit on allowable pulse current and power dissipation that they can tolerate.
      In order to switch more power, you can put a whole bunch of MOSFETs in parallel, or use a really big one, but then you're switching a huge amount of current all at once through your poor little inductor and capacitor, each of which also have ripple current ratings you should not exceed.
      So, instead, you get a switcher IC capable of controlling multiple phases (for instance the 4-phase L6714 from ST Micro if you're interested in powering an AMD64 processor) and 4 different MOSFETs, and each time the load capacitor must be recharged (again, every 1-5 microseconds), the IC will switch on one MOSFET after the other in sequence, resulting in a more steady load voltage, and a lower ripple current on the inductors and capacitors. This has multiple advantages for voltage quality, heat dissipation, and component life.
      The fact that it's subject to silly marketing does not mean they'd be stupid enough to buy 12 MOSFETs and expensive power controllers if they didn't need to for technical reasons.

    14. Re:What is a power array? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Informative

      Read frankschwab's link above about multiphase buck converters -- I learned some stuff from it (and I help design buck converters...) These are synchronous buck converters, so they have a high and low side mosfet, no freewheeling diode, and by putting several in parallel and then running them in round-robin style, you can reduce your power supply output ripple. It's a pretty sophisticated technique, and it's possible that they need 12 to get both the efficiency they want and the ripple they need. (If you're working with a synch buck, an efficiency limitation is the equivalent series resistance of the output capacitor, which also determines your output ripple, so by going to parallel converters you can tolerate smaller output caps without increasing output ripple.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    15. Re:What is a power array? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      phasers on 12 ? if 1 is stun, and 10 is kill. I'm guessing 12 will vaporize you in a shimmering flash like on old Star Trek.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    16. Re:What is a power array? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      There are compromises that have to be made in high current switching voltage regulators that multiphase designs somewhat ameliorate.

      At very high currents, not only does the switching element performance become critical (*1) but the parasitic inductance in the layout becomes significant. Using multiple switching stages in parallel allows for easier heat dissipation, easier circuit layout, and less expensive components to be used for a given level of performance. Running the switching stages out of phase lowers the input and output ripple current which can lower the filter capacitor series resistance and inductance requirements considerably.

      (*1) Gate drive current is usually limited to about 2 amps or less which limits switching speed with larger MOSFETs which in turn limits efficiency. At higher gate drive, inductance becomes significant enough to begin limiting switching speed without special circuit layout techniques.

    17. Re:What is a power array? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Since the switching regulator chops the DC into AC the use of the term phase is completely accurate.

    18. Re:What is a power array? by IcePop456 · · Score: 1

      Considering the fact that I work in the DC buck regulator industry and work with a few of the guys who developed this topology, do not underestimate marketing. We currently offer 4-6 phase solutions for VRM11 and VRM11.1. These are the Intel spec on how tight the Vcore voltage needs to be. We typical run 30A per phase. Find me a CPU that requires 12x30A = ~500Watts for just the CPU (multiprocessors may have more than one regulator). From what I see, the only complex upgrade for the core 2 duo's is the tighter voltage tolerance, lower Vcore, and work on improving idle efficiency. Since Intel did a lot of work on improving the efficiency of their CPUs, overall power consumption has not increased (probably decreased). I should point out that our 4-6 phase controllers have a more advanced implementation for adjusting for load transients (aka CPU goes from 0% to 100%). It is possible that Gigabyte figured out a way to pay for 12 phases cheaply instead of 6 phases that are more intelligent. Here's one of our parts: http://www.intersil.com/cda/deviceinfo/0,1477,ISL6 327,0.html/

    19. Re:What is a power array? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some time ago they actually switched to stepping down the 12v power instead of the 3.3v
      It's easier and more efficient to step down 12v -> 1.something than it is from 3.3v to 1.something when it's at 75 or so watts.

    20. Re:What is a power array? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DUMMY MODE ON

    21. Re:What is a power array? by dpiven · · Score: 1

      You've been snorting Dr. Bronner's again, haven't you.

  3. Why? by danbert8 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is this really neccesary?
     
    (Before someone else replies, I have the most likely response, "Necessary? Is it necessary that I drink my own urine? No, but I do it anyways because it's sterile and I like the taste." -Patches O'Houlihan)

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    1. Re:Why? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      They should replacs the 2 of the lan ports with usb ports or more fire wire ports as they give you 0 usb / firewire back plans.

    2. Re:Why? by asphaltjesus · · Score: 1

      4x LAN?
      If they were deployed right, it would be very nice teaming and redundancy. What are the chances of that on retail hardware?

      10x SATA
      I need a new file server. Nothing like an LVM using 10 drives. Pretty cheap. But hot.

      Is there a performance benefit to putting those ports there?
      If you did the same thing with PCI slots the power and heat requirements might be higher.

      No doubt this will be an expensive board few will pay for.

      --
      Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
    3. Re:Why? by ZwJGR · · Score: 1

      Ack, all those LAN and SATA ports, and *one* IDE port.
      One!
      So your machine can serve as an ultra-über-mega-server-games-machine being connected to 4 LANs and having 10 SATA hard drives, with two graphics cards (4 screens?), and up to 10 USB ports, but you can only have max 2 PATA IDE devices :?
      They deemed necessary to sully it's presence with floppy, serial and PS/2 ports, so why not another IDE or two...

      No good for me, with one SATA hard drive, one PATA IDE one, and two PATA IDE optical drives...

      --
      There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face - Ben Williams
    4. Re:Why? by magarity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two reasons: Slots cost more during manufacturing than headers. And modern video cards with hugemongous heatsinks overlap at least one of the spare slots (mine has a passive heatsink and takes up 2 other slots plus the one its plugged into) so slots are really less useful than having ports built in elsewhere.

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly the problem with these modern motherboards. You get 3x PCI-E slots, and plenty of LAN and SATA ports but you get 1x IDE and after seating 2 high-end videocards you're left with 0-1 PCI slots. It's ridiculous that they'd cripple expandability the way they do for that third GPU.

    6. Re:Why? by value_added · · Score: 1
      4x LAN?
      If they were deployed right, it would be very nice teaming and redundancy. What are the chances of that on retail hardware?


      From the fine article:

      controller, two of the GigE LAN ports are powered by the nForce chipset, the other two by a pair of Marvell PCI Express controller,


      My first thought was that if I needed 4 GigE NICs, they'd all be Intel, so maybe this isn't so much a feature.
    7. Re:Why? by asphaltjesus · · Score: 1

      After reading TFA it sounds to me like they probably build another board like it for another brand. This is pretty common behavior.

      The feature set sounds like it belongs in a server more than the average desktop.

      --
      Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
    8. Re:Why? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Also, they should have some 8 bit slots! I got a 300 baud modem to run!

      Sheesh, get with the times.

      10 USB posts isn't a lot. I have iPod, Shuffle, Camera, printer, head set and external drive.
      Considering most people also have a USB mouse and keyboard and speakers.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Why? by saider · · Score: 1


      Add another $25US to the cost for the SATA to PATA bridge.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    10. Re:Why? by compro01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sheesh, get with the times.

      tell that to the optical drive manufacturers. it is still problematic to find SATA optical drives at reasonable cost.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    11. Re:Why? by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      That's - at least in large part - due to there being no real compelling reason for optical drives to be SATA. An 18x DVD reader is moving, what, roughly 24Mb/sec?

      I also don't expect to see SATA floppy drives available any time soon.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    12. Re:Why? by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

      I like most of the setup...like the all solid state caps...
      But I have to ask who would really use some of the features it has?

      Points:
      1. 10 Sata ports...obviously there are some video editing applications or SOHO server applications this might be good for but still it sounds just a tad overkill.
      2. 4Gigabit ethernet ports!?!?...What would someone use this for? Oh, I know...gotta be able to hook up those 4 T1s coming into your "Swordfish" style hacking suite:P I suppose you could setup all sorts of VLAN goodies with them...but why??? Seems to me that putting more USB ports on the backplate would have been more useful.


      Another observation is the arrangement of the PCI and PCI-E slots. Kinda reminds me of some of those old 486 and 586 boards of yesteryear that had intertwined PCI and ISA slots on them:) Ahh the memories.

    13. Re:Why? by Control+Group · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know about that...how many PCIe 16x slots do you use in an average server? How much do you care if your MB runs silent in your average data center? What do you need 10 USB ports, or even a single Firewire port for in a DL380? Or an optical audio output?

      No, this board looks to me like it's exactly what they're marketing it as: a mainboard for the home enthusiast.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    14. Re:Why? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      but you can only have max 2 PATA IDE devices :?

      And that's 2 too many.

      PATA ribbon cables are horrid. I've successfully converted all of my new system to SATA except for the optical drive now (and that'll soon be SATA). I purposely bought an Asus board that only had 1 IDE port (hard to find boards with none).

    15. Re:Why? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That wasn't what leapt out at me...What leapt out at me was "All those SATA ports, and NO RAID"

      Unless you're going to be buying a craptacular "fake raid" card, you're going to be paying hundreds of dollars for a card that can handle these drives, so it's a good thing the damn board comes with extra PCI express slots, especially since you're more likely to find a PCI-X raid card, and there are no PCI-X slots on this board (and good luck trying to fit it into a PCI slot, with all that extra crap on the board).

      All that SATA with no RAID suggests that all the extra SATA slots are just epeen. All the board real estate used on things that you don't need multiples of, just so you're forced to blow a card slot to make up for it.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    16. Re:Why? by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      If you're serious about using RAID arrays and want to have uber-storage, 10 SATA ports isn't that over the top. I don't disagree that it's overkill, to be sure, but not to a degree I find silly for a top-end, top-dollar product.

      4 GbE ports does seem a bit much, though. 2 you could team on a home network to potentially good effect, but with 4 you've got teaming and redundancy (assuming you can even set it up that way). I really don't see the need for network redundancy in my apartment. I suppose it does open up the possibility of using the box as a router...but I wouldn't want to do that with my main rig anyway, so it still seems sort of pointless.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    17. Re:Why? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      You don't want to have a sever with SOFTWARE raid. You can team the 2 nforce lan parts the 2 other ports should be replaced with a FULL firewire port.

    18. Re:Why? by r3m0t · · Score: 1

      Their is a compelling reason - most new motherboards only have 1 port! I also got one of the dead cheap HP OEMs and it had no IDE ports at all. The local store didn't even have any SATA burners.

    19. Re:Why? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      True, but consider the following: if optical drives were SATA, one could ditch the whole PATA interface and save space on the motherboard. As for floppy drives: I have yet to see a modern computer coming with one.

    20. Re:Why? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It's not that bad if you can route them properly. I don't see the point in paying a significant premium for a SATA optical drive. The reason that there aren't a whole lot of boards without a PATA port is because not many people have that sort of ideological bent. It costs almost nothing to install the socket, and it costs almost nothing to just not use the socket, and turning away people that want the port would cost more in sales than leaving the socket off saves. I certainly don't think it's worth buying an ASUS board just so you only get one socket. It's better to have a more upstanding brand behind it and have an extra port you won't use.

    21. Re:Why? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      But it doesn't come with RAID! If you buy a decent RAID controller, it'll have the ports on it for the drives, so what's the point of having 10 slots on the mobo, and no RAID controller? I guess you could buy a 20 dollar pseudo-raid card, but that would be screwing yourself if you're going to be buying 6+ HDDs.

      Agreed on the ethernet, though looking around it's hard to find multi-port gigabit cards that are anything except PCI-X, so it'd be hard to get a lot of extra ports. Still, for my money, what the hell do you need that many ports for? Some kind of multi-tiered firewall where you want physical separation of subnets?

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    22. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Software RAID would work.

    23. Re:Why? by caspper69 · · Score: 1

      I agree that if you're running serious RAID you'll need a hardware controller, which would pretty much make the onboard SATA ports junk anyway. But, don't think that higher-end cards are exclusive to PCI-X. As a matter of fact, I was recently researching a new server using Areca cards which are all PCIe x8 based, with up to 24 sata ports, with support for up to 2GB DDR2 ECC memory and amazingly fast Intel cpus. The market is rapidly moving toward commodity SATA drives using PCIe slots, and I for one welcome the change. Sure, you may drop $2k for a RAID board and memory, but it will absolutely destroy most of what's on the market using 10k Raptors, especially what's available in the enthusiast segment (save the highest-end U320 SCSI w/15k drives). I still think my 64-bit/66Mhz PCI Adaptec 2410SA w/64MB ram with 4 10k (36G 1st generation) Raptors blows any of my "integrated" RAID controllers out of the water, and it's over three years old.

    24. Re:Why? by IhuntCIA · · Score: 1

      For the server / router / video montage / game machine.
      Nop. Unless one can use all of that crap they are just going to use power / CPU power. Superior performance motherboards usually have no on board controllers at all and do have a lot of PCI slots that can be used with optimal mix of superior controller add on cards.

    25. Re:Why? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      It looks more like idiot power user than server to me. There is no on-board remote management capability, only one CPU socket, and the RAM slots are perpendicular to the rest of the components, so it'd be tough to get good airflow in a rackmount chassis. Maybe not idiot power user, though - I suppose that a high-end workstation could potentially use interface bonding to get some mileage out of the four ethernet ports, although there is probably a better way to get the same task done.

    26. Re:Why? by tourvil · · Score: 1

      There really isn't a significant premium for SATA anymore. A quick check of newegg came up with at least one example:

      Lite-On 20x DVD burner (IDE): $28.99
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8 2E16827106048

      Lite-On 20x DVD burner (SATA): $30.99
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8 2E16827106070

    27. Re:Why? by RoundSparrow · · Score: 1

      Actually... I think a lot of people value add-ons to the motherboard more than a card. A chip for Ethernet Gigabit cost maybe $3 and to add it to a motherboard costs next to nothing. But to package it as a card, with instructions, box, independent shipping and support - makes it sell for $25.

      Right now you can get from Newegg PCI Express SATA controllers with 2 ports for $20, but the ones with 4 ports are all more than double. Just the way it goes, nobody making one with 4 ports with two chips on it ;)

    28. Re:Why? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I like the idea of 4 NIC's. For my home server box I could put my Cable Modem, internal lan, and wireless all on different subnets, heck I wouldn't even need a separate network switch any more. At the very least, I wish all motherboards would come with dual NICs to serve as simple routers without a PCI card.

    29. Re:Why? by rachit · · Score: 2, Funny

      As for floppy drives: I have yet to see a modern computer coming with one. s/modern computer/woman/g

    30. Re:Why? by ashren · · Score: 1

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8 2E16827135145 $29.99 3 Business Day Shipping $5.84 how is that not "reasonable"

    31. Re:Why? by drgruney · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. Personally i would prefer to have some firewire than 3 Lan ports I won't need. Or built in wifi or bluetooth. hell, fibre channel instead of so many ethernet ports would make more sense.

    32. Re:Why? by windex82 · · Score: 1

      I'd team up two for the internal network, internet on one, wireless on the other. If I had some kind of VOIP service I'd put it on one of the internal ones.

      I believe its target is home servers using windows home server. One of its hot features is the storage system. I'll be paraphrasing but let me describe it as best I can. It is not raid but fault tolerant and each additional drive increases the systems storage IO capacity. The storage area is pooled into one large drive and data is always on two physical drives at the same time. Drives of any size can be added and their capabilities are added to the pool. I know I should have read the article but it maybe that this board wont be available to the general public and only system builders making windows home servers. If this is the case no raid makes perfect sense.

    33. Re:Why? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      This would not be the first time I have seen a nVidia based motherboard with multiple LAN ports where the extra third party ones were very useful because the nVidia ones suffered from poor performance, data corruption, and lack of documentation.

    34. Re:Why? by Tsagadai · · Score: 1

      In all honestly it defies logic as to why you want a firewire on the backpanel. On one of those expansion slot doovies yes, backpanel no. I don't even know anyone who doesn't own a mac and uses firewire at all. 4 NICs are a very good feature for a motherboard.

    35. Re:Why? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      hmm. must've missed that. but in any point, i can't shop there are they don't ship to canada. i'll have to look around some more, as it seems that things have changed since i was last purchasing stuff.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    36. Re:Why? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      What leapt out at me was "All those SATA ports, and NO RAID"

      Bah. Hardware RAID is obsolete anyway. Software RAID rules.

      Oh, and vi is better than emacs. ;-)

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    37. Re:Why? by AntiTuX · · Score: 1

      Uhm.. it does have RAID functionality.

      Look at This Picture.

    38. Re:Why? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      But it doesn't come with RAID! If you buy a decent RAID controller, it'll have the ports on it for the drives, so what's the point of having 10 slots on the mobo, and no RAID controller?

      From the article, page 2:

      The 6 main ports are powered by the 680i chipset and support multiple RAID modes, but the purple ports along the bottom edge come by way of a pair of individual controllers and arrays can't be built across them; individually they do support two-drive RAID, however.

      So not only does it have built-in RAID ability, it's got THREE controllers; One six port and two dual port.

      =Smidge=
    39. Re:Why? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Shame they opted for the crappy Marvell chipset then.

      For what it's worth, the built-in GigE ports on the 590 Southbridge (the 680i chipset uses an older southbridge) are actually pretty good. I've seen some reports that one port is better than the other though (lower CPU load during transfers), but I've never tested it myself.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    40. Re:Why? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      You don't know anybody with a DV camcorder? Or an external HDD with Firewire? When I first installed my machine I couldn't find drivers for the built-in ethernet controller, lucky thing the firewire port was available so I could run firewire ethernet over to another machine and get my new box on the net.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    41. Re:Why? by holistah · · Score: 1

      uhm...it does come with raid... nvraid is built into 680i (and almost every nvidia chipset for the last 5 years or so), and is even an option shown in the bios on the screenshots... but then you'd know that if you RTFA... I wonder why you would make such a matter-of-fact comment/complaint without even having anything to base it on.
      granted, nvraid is, from what I have read, essentially software raid, but still, it comes with it! :)

    42. Re: Why? by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1

      Is there a performance benefit to putting those ports there, instead of providing lots of PCI slots so you can create your own optimal mix of ports?
      Of course there is -- the performance of the sales of the board increases linearily with the number of ports on it!
    43. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Software RAID is very nice.

      With the older NVIDIA boards, after the 6th SATA port you had to use up one of your PCIe slots for a RAID card (or a SATA interface card). With one of these boards, that ceases to be an issue (personally, I want 16 ports and a ECC RAM setup).

    44. Re:Why? by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      Unless you happen to already have the IDE one. Then the cost difference is not $2.00, but $30.99.

    45. Re:Why? by therufus · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget hard drives are now not the only SATA devices. DVDRW drives are now SATA too. Maybe someone might want 4 SATA DVDRW drives, and a huge amount of data storage using the remaining 6 SATA ports for hard drives. Sure, they're probably more a pirate than Long John Silver, but where there are needs, there will be purchases.

      --
      You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
    46. Re:Why? by bcmm · · Score: 1

      it's hard to find multi-port gigabit cards that are anything except PCI-X
      That's because 2x1Gb/s is more bandwidth than a single standard PCI slot has.
      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    47. Re:Why? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      not so crappy (marvell).

      I tried an intel gig-e pci-e (pci is not good enough, imho, for true gig-e). the intel card was flakey and didn't work under linux.

      I've read many reports of the marvell based pci-e gig-e chip. they say it works 'out of the box' with linux. my intel pro/1000 pci-e card sure did NOT!

      normally I run eepro100 or e1000 but the pci-e card is a dog and not ready for prime time (not sure why, but it does seem so)

      btw, having to turn off TSO on my pro1000 cards sucks, too. intel is NOT perfect even if it is the preferred linux/bsd card (for pci, at least).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    48. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I have a pile of MFM hard drives, and some VLB video cards lying around. Where are my slots?

      If I'm buying a new motherboard, I like to scavenge as much as I can from the older machine as well. But that doesn't mean that I can.

    49. Re:Why? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Comparing PATA to MFM makes no sense, they are polar opposite It's actually a significant disadvantage to using MFM, but using a PATA drive will get you 99% the SATA performance in a device that already exists and is paid for.

    50. Re:Why? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that...how many PCIe 16x slots do you use in an average server?

      Depends on how many RAID controllers you want to put in there.

      How much do you care if your MB runs silent in your average data center?

      No fans on the motherboard is a win from a standpoint of not having to worry if your box will go down because some cheap-ass fan failed. Less noise is just a bonus. The fans that fail the most in my machines are the rinky-dink 40- and 60-mm fans on video cards and motherboards. It used to be the fans in power supplies that used to crap out all the time, but those seem to have gotten better.

      What do you need 10 USB ports, or even a single Firewire port for in a DL380? Or an optical audio output?

      Those admittedly sound more like desktop features than server features. WhoTF needs four LAN ports in a desktop machine, though? One of mine has two ports, and I've never used more than one. More than one port would be nice in a server and is essential in a router, but is useless in a workstation.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  4. Passively cooled sounds good but not quiet. by CodeShark · · Score: 2, Funny

    With all the heat piping in this thing it sounds really great for quietness -- except that the heat still has to be removed from the enclosure so that it doesn't toast lots of other electronic whatzits Of course, if they put a little coffee plate on the top of the enclosure you could prolly use one of things to brew up a pot but otherwise the quiet factor goes away because of the newly required higher capacity enclosure fan.

    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
    1. Re:Passively cooled sounds good but not quiet. by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

      Feel free to correct me if I am wrong, but for most desktop/tower cases the biggest source of sound is the tiny video card and CPU fans spinning at $BIGNUM rpm. The larger and slower case fans make less sound and at far less obtrusive frequencies. This was the logic behind all those fan controllers and BIOS fan speed controls to slow down the smaller fans whenever the heat load was diminished. It also explains some of the more monstrous CPU cooler rigs out there. Using a big chunk of Cu allows you to use a bigger, slower and hence quieter fan. A passively cooled setup that relies on a large (80mm or larger.) case fan to move that hot air out of the box is going to be inherently a lot quieter than the more typical CPU and Video card fan setup. This rig would still be quiet. Not silent, I'll grant you, but still quieter than the average. In my travels across the WWW, the only truly silent (as in 0Db) systems I have read about are custom built boxes based on mini or nano ITX boards, flash based HDD, 12VDC power supplies and so on. Fun little machines no doubt, but not the makings of a high end desktop machine that this mobo seems to be intended for. (I actually RTFA, 8Gb RAM, 10 SATA ports, 4 Gb RJ-45s sounds like a pretty potent unit to me.)

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    2. Re:Passively cooled sounds good but not quiet. by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      But you already have a system exhaust fan. Going from a 100 mm fan to a 120 mm fan (running at the same RPM to move more air) won't increase the noise level as much as keeping the 100 mm and also having a whiny little 40 mm fan on the northbridge. And that's assuming that you actually need to increase the total air throughput.

      I've certainly built systems where the total air throughput was more than adequate to move all the heat, but it wasn't adequate to cool down a specific hotspot. Which isn't surprising, since this is why we've got heat sinks and fans on CPUs: they don't increase total air flow through the case, they just even out the heat load to take better advantage of that total air flow.

      Anyway, my point is that this really should make the system quieter, either because you get to ditch the particularly noisy little fan on the chipset in favor of a size increase on your biggest (and therefore quietest) fan, or because you can just take better advantage of your existing biggest (and therefore quietest) fan.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    3. Re:Passively cooled sounds good but not quiet. by Low2000 · · Score: 1

      My question is:

      Does heat piping work well in a case in which the motherboard is mounted upside down?

      I have one of those, and could never find a good answer.

    4. Re:Passively cooled sounds good but not quiet. by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Does heat piping work well in a case in which the motherboard is mounted upside down?

      being as heatpipes have been used for cooling in zero gravity, i doubt it would make any differant at all what direction the tubing goes.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    5. Re:Passively cooled sounds good but not quiet. by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      No no no! You've got it all wrong! The "heat piping" is what was once called a "radiator" You put it in your house and run it during winter to stay warm - No need for a case; it just adds weight. They are coming out with a summer model in January.

      --
      Get a web developer
    6. Re:Passively cooled sounds good but not quiet. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      You can do liquid cooled that's pretty quiet, but otherwise, yea. If you get a good quiet air cooler (they are often huge chunks of Cu with a big slow fan ;) then the biggest source of noise (assuming a decent power supply) is the video card.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    7. Re:Passively cooled sounds good but not quiet. by Prune · · Score: 1

      Take the heatpipes to the back of the case into copper blocks sunk into very large external heatsink with vertical fins (so convection provides the airflow), i.e. the kind of heat sink you see in high powered class A audio amplifiers. We actually designed something like this and works well.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    8. Re:Passively cooled sounds good but not quiet. by lenehey · · Score: 1

      Yup it doesn't matter. Look up "heat pipe" in Wikipedia. Basically, it has a wick attached to the inside walls of the heat pipe, the liquid at the hot side of the pipe evaporates and condenses on the cold side, where it is wicked back to the hot side. Gravity is not a significant part of the equation.

    9. Re:Passively cooled sounds good but not quiet. by 3choTh1s · · Score: 1

      But it does make it quieter. Just like making other components of the computer use heat pipes. The idea is that whether or not you use heat pipes your computer is still going to need intake and exhaust fans. Preferably large quiet fans. These fans will take the hot air produced by the heat pipes and shove it out. You still have the noise of the intake and the exhaust but you don't have the noise of the accessory fans. If you have a heat pipes on your cpu and gpu then those are 2 less fans to maintain and worry about the noise for. Without those fans your normal computer would be quite a bit quieter. Not silent but less noisy.

  5. Tech Review Site by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Funny

    I intend to launch a tech review site immediately after you give me a copy of that motherboard for review. Just ship it to my house, and I promise you a good review. Mind you I can't really test the board's SLI features unless I have two top-end video cards as well. And I can't really test the overclocking unless you give me a processor, but in the end, you'll get a glowing review. It will be worth it.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Tech Review Site by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And I would visit your review site provided you don't use those god awful double underlined adds..... Sorry for the rant but those things drive me crazy, they hardly ever are relevant to the context to the way the word is used and they come up just by moving the mouse over them....

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    2. Re:Tech Review Site by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And I shouldn't split two pages of content over 12 pages just to generate more ad hits?

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Tech Review Site by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I doubt he would use the double-underlined ads. From a fellow of his standing, I would expect no less than one of those "You're visitor number 1000000. Congratulations, you WON!" with the 10 Hz flashing background that causes epileptic seizures.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    4. Re:Tech Review Site by cruff · · Score: 1

      I don't see these types of underlined ads anymore after I placed the site referenced by the Javascript responsible for foisting the ads upon the unsuspecting reader into my Adblock preferences.

    5. Re:Tech Review Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      If you're using Opera or Konqueror, blocking "*intellitxt.com*" gets rid of those ads.

      Unsurprisingly, Firefox doesn't have that feature.

    6. Re:Tech Review Site by EmperorArthur · · Score: 1

      It's called Adblock.

      I personally don't feel like using a web browser that gives me every feature under the sun, and no way to turn them off.

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
    7. Re:Tech Review Site by VENONA · · Score: 1

      Multiple pages seems reasonable in a way. If you have to have the adds due to your business model, at least the shorter first page would make for a shorter download for those who are still on dialup, and don't run an add blocker.

      I generally look that the first page of a multi-part article, and if I want to read the entire thing, I look for a print function to get it all on one page. Many hardware sites have them, and they work well enough for me. My browser/OS doesn't actually perform a print function, though. If yours does, never mind...

      --
      What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
    8. Re:Tech Review Site by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      And I would visit your review site provided you don't use those god awful double underlined adds...

      I only ever see those on other people's computers. Between Adblock Plus and NoScript, they don't show up here.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  6. Well, two is better than none by vfs · · Score: 1

    I was surprised to read in the blurb that it had three PCI-Express x16 slots, but the hardware summary on the story says it only has two. Still, better than just one.

    1. Re:Well, two is better than none by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 1

      Several boards have come out that have 3 x16 PCI-express slots, two for video and the extra for a physics card. Ah well, a man can dream... a man can dream.

    2. Re:Well, two is better than none by magarity · · Score: 1

      I was surprised to read in the blurb that it had three PCI-Express x16 slots, but the hardware summary on the story says it only has two
       
      2 of them are for SLI video cards and are x16, the third is for whatever is only x8. In the pictures the orange one is the 8x while the 2 blue ones are for x16 SLI video. The blurb is incorrect - maybe the submitter just looked at the pictures?

    3. Re:Well, two is better than none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the summary and the article are both correct. There are 3 slots that can accept full-length x16 PCI-Express cards and electrically power them. 1 of these slots only transfers data at x8 however.

      No company makes x8 Video cards and so far testing doesn't show much of an advantage to x8 vs. x16 bus speeds yet, so you effectively have 3 x16 slots available.

    4. Re:Well, two is better than none by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      The third slot is physically x16, so it counts as being called "x16" and the blurb is correct. It's electrically x8, so the article is also correct. You can put an x16 card in it; it'll just run at x8 speed.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Well, two is better than none by mastermemorex · · Score: 0

      I tell you why the PCI slots configuration.

      2 PCIe slots X 16 for a NVIDIA 8800 GTX or ULTRA graphic card
      1 PCIe slot X 8 for a Virtex FPGA
      1 PCIe slot X 1 for a PhysX

      And Lets rock this baby!

  7. But... by jonnythan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will it blend?

    That is the question :)

  8. editors..... by KillerCow · · Score: 4, Informative
    From TFS:

    it also has three full-length PCI Express x16 slots for multi-GPU support.


    From TFA:

    2 PCI Express x16 slots
    1 PCI Express x8 slot

    1. Re:editors..... by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      You weren't seriously expecting the editors to proof-read and verify the submission, were you?

      That's like asking them to spell-check everything. That will never happen.

    2. Re:editors..... by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      The x8 slot is the same physical size as the x16 slots, so x16 cards will fit in it. Same as putting an 8xAGP card in a 4x slot.

    3. Re:editors..... by matt2413 · · Score: 1

      It's a x16 slot, physically, but an x8 slot electronically - like all the 680i chipset boards.

      --
      Matt
  9. Why? by hcdejong · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why stick so many ports (4x LAN, 10x SATA) on the motherboard? Is there a performance benefit to putting those ports there, instead of providing lots of PCI slots so you can create your own optimal mix of ports?

  10. Re:First Post by fattmatt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    first post? what is this ... fuckedcompany.com 1999?

    oops ... i ate the bait...

  11. Nice cooling system by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 0

    The wrap-around design looks like an improvement over the standard system without going overboard like the ASUS Striker Extreme. How do these two cooling systems compare?

  12. No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    almost $300 for a lot of crap that I will never use

  13. solid-state capacitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100% solid-state capacitors Is there another option? I've never heard of a vacuum tube capacitor.
    1. Re:solid-state capacitors by Ashtead · · Score: 3, Informative
      Vacuum capacitors actually do exist, but their capacitance is way too small for the decoupling jobs that the capacitors on a PC motherboard do. Not a likely option as they tend to find use in high-power, high-frequency radio or radar equipment, with price tags to match.

      The opposite of "solid-state" capacitors is in this case the aluminium electrolytic capacitors. Presumably they just use tantalum or some other kind instead on this board. Now, these are also polarized and technically also "electrolytic" (besides, they can still fail) but their failure mode does not include emitting nasty goop onto the board.

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
    2. Re:solid-state capacitors by PoliTech · · Score: 1

      From TFA: "As we continue our tour around the GA-N680SLI-DQ6, you may notice that this board is equipped with nothing but solid-state capacitors; no electrolytic caps are to be found. This should help with the board's longevity as there no chance of a leaky cap.

    3. Re:solid-state capacitors by mmontour · · Score: 1

      Is there another option? I've never heard of a vacuum tube capacitor. Vacuum Capacitors exist, although you're not likely to find them on a PC motherboard.
    4. Re:solid-state capacitors by IhuntCIA · · Score: 1

      Someone correct me if I am wrong...

      It is some journalist mambo-jumbo. The motherboard uses some non-electrolytic capacitors ( the brown boxes near CPU socket ) I believe that those are multilayer ceramic capacitors. The rest just look like regular SMD aluminium electrolytic capacitors ( shiny gauges with blue / green title on the top ). I have never heard of motherboard that uses non solid-state capacitors like adjustable one. Non solid-state components should be the component that have moving parts.
      BTW I hate SMD aluminium electrolytic capacitors. The reason is that soldering alloy becomes brittle after some (years) time, so they just fall off.

    5. Re:solid-state capacitors by Jeek+Elemental · · Score: 1

      I may be off, but Id think using solid caps were to ensure reliability over time.
      Electrolytics dry up and change capacitance over time, they may work for a long time but a point will come where its value is so off it causes failure elsewhere.
      That said, cap types is a whole science and there may be other reasons why they use these particular types.

    6. Re:solid-state capacitors by fbjon · · Score: 1

      So, there are only two missing now: are gas and/or plasma capacitors possible to construct?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    7. Re:solid-state capacitors by NerveGas · · Score: 3, Informative

      Regular aluminum electrolytic capacitors are filled with liquid. When driven hard and hot, that liquid evaporates or boils. There are various other types of caps that have no liquid, including solid tantalum and ceramic. They generally have lower ESR (good), and last (for all intents and purposes) forever, but are definitely more expensive.

      About the only advantage of an aluminum electrolytic is that it's cheap.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    8. Re:solid-state capacitors by Prune · · Score: 1

      Total BS. Looking at the photo, I see a whole ton of crimp-style surface mount electrolytic capacitors. This is the dumbest thing I've read in a long time on /.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    9. Re:solid-state capacitors by Prune · · Score: 1

      That's wrong, actually. The advantage of electrolytics is that they have very large capacitance for their size (tantalum electrolytics more so than aluminum electrolytics, but tantalums are more expensive and are limited to lower voltages).

      The article has way too much BS. The photo of the board makes it obvious that it's full of crimp-style surface mount electrolytic capacitors. "Solid state capacitors" yeah right... dumbest thing I've read on /. in a while.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    10. Re:solid-state capacitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is the most grievous mistake you've seen here then quality is pretty good.

  14. solid-core vs solid-state by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Informative

    The correct term is 'solid-core', not 'solid-state', FYI.

    1. Re:solid-core vs solid-state by effigiate · · Score: 1

      I was trying to figure out how they would make a "Solid-State" capacitor...

    2. Re:solid-core vs solid-state by Apocros · · Score: 1

      on-die MOS capacitors are actually quite common.

      --
      "onward!" cried the copper man, little knowing brass corrupts...
  15. Three PCI Express 16X Slots? by langelgjm · · Score: 1

    Three PCI Express 16X Slots? I'm not quite sure I get that one. Why? To run SLI on one pair, and have another single graphics card? Most cards today come with two outputs anyway, and if you're crazy enough to need SLI on two monitors, why wouldn't you need it on your third/fourth? Four slots would've made more sense to me.

    I guess they must be aiming at the booming five- and six-monitor market...?

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    1. Re:Three PCI Express 16X Slots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe "SLI" is supposed to be generalized over the next generation of cards, so you can run in configurations with more than two.

    2. Re:Three PCI Express 16X Slots? by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      You forget the physics card that you really need if you are going to show off your billion dollar machine. Of course pretty soon they'll have dual physics cards that run in parallel to compliment your dual-core processor, dual-channel memory, SLI graphics, and RAID array.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    3. Re:Three PCI Express 16X Slots? by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      I believe "SLI" is supposed to be generalized over the next generation of cards, so you can run in configurations with more than two.

      I hadn't thought of that; I guess I still have my old 3dfx Voodoo2s in mind. Still, the Wikipedia article only details dual- and quad-slot setups, and has only this to say about three-slot motherboards:

      In response to ATI offering a discrete physics calculation solution in a tri-GPU system, NVIDIA announced a partnership with physics middleware company Havok to incorporate a similar system using a similar approach. Although this would eventually become the Quantum Effects technology, many motherboard companies began producing boards with three PCI-Express x16 slots in anticipation of this implementation being used.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalable_Link_Interfa ce#Quad_SLI
      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    4. Re:Three PCI Express 16X Slots? by mytrip · · Score: 1

      two video cards for either crossfire or sli plus a physics accelerator. two ati or nvidia cards would let you drive four large monitors and then certain games will use a physics accelerator to offload some processing. I play flight simulator x in maximum resolution on multiple monitors and it is _very_ handy.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It just happens to be particular about who it makes friends with.
    5. Re:Three PCI Express 16X Slots? by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      So in other words, this extra slot isn't meant so much for video cards as it is for the few people willing to buy Ageia PhysX cards?

    6. Re:Three PCI Express 16X Slots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you have two cards in an SLI setup (or a Crossfire setup), you can only use on output total. Hence it's conceivable that someone would want an SLI setup connected to a primary monitor for gaming (or professional purposes, 3d modeling or whatever) and a third video card in the PCIE 8x slot for additional monitors.

    7. Re:Three PCI Express 16X Slots? by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1
      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
  16. What's really cool about the GA-965P-DQ6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PnP 1.0a, DMI 2.0, SM BIOS 2.3, ACPI 1.0b supports the T.I. TSB43AB23 1394 chip and Dual Channel DDR2 800/667/533 ram. The LGA775 is paired nicely with 1333/1066/800/533 MHz FSB. Another cool thing is how the TMP and LPT connectors complement the S/PDIF out port which includes the ALC888 DD audio codec, Q-Flash and @BIOS. For internet connectivity, the 88E8052/88E8056 chip superheats the 88E1116 phy (10/100/1000 Mbit) nic. Also you can plug in some DDR2 667/533/400 DIMM or ECC type DRAM (what ever floats your boat!). Anyway, good motherboard, a little expensive but all in all worth it.

    1. Re:What's really cool about the GA-965P-DQ6 by Megaweapon · · Score: 1

      With talk like that you must get all the chicks.

      --
      I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    2. Re:What's really cool about the GA-965P-DQ6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, heheeheh, I have been known to interface with a few sockets in my time. hehehehe. You know what I mean? hehehehehe. Interface? Hehehe... Sockets? Hehehe... By which I mean I attached my male socket to the female recepticle. Get it? Hehehehe. Male = penis, Female = vagina. HEHEHHEHE., get it? OK I fucked some fat chicks. Get it? hehehehehe. Oh and they were fat32 not NTFS. I feel so dirty. I had to pay for it too.

  17. Solid state capacitors? by glwtta · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    As opposed to the ones that have moving parts?

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
    1. Re:Solid state capacitors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to ones that use liquid.

      captcha: ohmmeter

  18. Sigh. This is news? by sloth+jr · · Score: 0, Troll

    Another motherboard. No real performance standouts. Usual mix of ports and "more" crap. Marketing nonsense like 12-phase power array. Another review spread in 6 or more pages.

    Wake me when something really interesting happens.

    sloth jr

    1. Re:Sigh. This is news? by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      Did you hear? It can run Linux too.

    2. Re:Sigh. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy this preview of the linux-based mini-laptop ASUS Eee.

      Personally I'd really like to see 1GiB memory instead of 512MiB, especially with DDR2 as low is it is. Yes, even if it draws a bit more energy. I believe being able to cache and collate flash-writes would be worth it.

      Man, I hope the powertop the fuck out of the bundled apps.

    3. Re:Sigh. This is news? by sloth+jr · · Score: 1

      Dear asshat moderators,

      I'll take my hits as appropriate - BUT - how the FUCK is this offtopic? I'm talking about the very subject of the article!!!!

      sloth jr

  19. AMD !!! by n0084ever · · Score: 0, Redundant

    just a personal preference, but I'll wait for a comparable AMD board, thank you very much.

    1. Re:AMD !!! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      we understand not everyone deems quality important, good luck with that.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:AMD !!! by IhuntCIA · · Score: 1

      The ABIT KT-7 motherboard says hello to You.

    3. Re:AMD !!! by andawyr · · Score: 1

      As does the Asus M2N32 WS Professional

    4. Re:AMD !!! by IhuntCIA · · Score: 1

      lol dude ...

      I just wanted to point out that quality is not Intel only. The motherboard FTA is not the first one to use solid-core electrolytic capacitors.
      The KT-7 motherboard that waved hello to geekoid dude is more than six years old now and it still works. The aluminium electrolytic capacitors are the only limiting factor for the motherboard life time, and the KT-7 motherboard I have mentioned had several electrolytic capacitors replaced over last six years. If it had solid-core tantalum capacitors like the motherboard FTA it would never require service.
      That means that we could use reliable computers for years, and throw them away when they are obsolete, not when they fail because of some low life time aluminium electrolytic capacitor. We could if the manufacturers switch to solid-core tantalum capacitors.

  20. Capacitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    All the hardware faults I've had in the past few years are due to bad caps. I hope other manufacturers take the hint and ditch using electrolytics for their mobos. The only place I want to see electrolytics are in the power supply.

    1. Re:Capacitors by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

      A few years ago an electrolytic capacitor in my PSU literally exploded, frying the mobo, both CPUs, keyboard and mouse...

      Beef.

    2. Re:Capacitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but that's rare and using solid core caps to smooth the ripple current is prohibitively expensive.

    3. Re:Capacitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually in the motherboards they're used only to filter out noise from power supply lines, which is the same thing they do in the power supply box. You can't simply leave this task to the ones in the PSU because the more you put the filters near the load (motherboard) the better they work.
      The problem isn't the technology per se, which allows to easily build electrolytic capacitors that work for over a decade 24/7 without problems, but some manufacturers using ultra-low quality parts way below the specs nearly everywhere and the capacitors themselves being more spectacular in case of failure.

    4. Re:Capacitors by NerveGas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, your motherboard *is* a power supply. It has switching DC-DC converters that take 12V and drop it down to the various voltages used by your CPU, chipset, DIMMs, etc.. The caps (and inductors) are there to smooth the resultant chopped-up supply, and that's a task where your ripple current is very large - leading to a lot of heat, and hence, short lifetimes for aluminum capacitors.

      Not only do the solid caps not have a liquid electrolyte to boil off, they very well may have lower ESR to boot - producing less heat, producing higher efficiency, and doing an even better job of smoothing. The only downside is cost.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    5. Re:Capacitors by IhuntCIA · · Score: 1

      True. I have replaced one faulty aluminium electrolytic capacitors on the GeForce FX 5200 4 hours ago. The old AGP card works like brand new again. I have been replacing aluminium electrolytic capacitors on the motherboards for last seven years. It is cheep and easy way to repair the motherboards. While repaired motherboard might not be the best gaming solution, it is usually useful for internet / routing / multimedia.

      There is no hope that manufacturers will ditch using aluminium electrolytic capacitors any time soon. The reason is that modern high performance / low performance per watt CPU like AMD or Intel uses 100 Amps at 1.5 Volts, so high capacitors are needed in motherboard power supply just to keep ripple voltage low enough. Aluminium electrolytic capacitors have life time 1000 to 5000 hours depending on load, (high load gives short life time).
      Solid-core tantalum and vanadium capacitors are too expensive and bulky for motherboards and they are not available in large capacitance's / voltages. They do have an advantage of much longer lifetime compared to aluminium electrolytic capacitors, so I guess manufacturers will use solid-core electrolytic capacitors in high class motherboards only.

    6. Re:Capacitors by IhuntCIA · · Score: 1

      Electrolytic capacitors have short life when exposed to heat. They dry out or leak, swell, short-circuit and explode. The PSU sends high voltage pulse to the capacitor to take the energy load, but since there is no capacitor anymore voltage pulse just passes down the wires frying anything that is connected to it.
      As a rule, I do replace my PSU every year and half, and I suggest every year for the game machines or the render stations.

    7. Re:Capacitors by Wabbit+Wabbit · · Score: 1

      ...they very well may have lower ESR to boot...


      Anything with less Eric S. Raymond in it is good in my book.

      --
      Nothing is inexplicable; only unexplained -Tom Baker, Doctor Who
  21. slashvertisement tag ? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Anyone? I'm not sure why its news ...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:slashvertisement tag ? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Two words. They paid cmd taco off. Okay 5 words...

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    2. Re:slashvertisement tag ? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Two words. They paid cmd taco off. Okay 5 words... Then perhaps we'll learn soon how well it serves as a webserver board on a popular techie site...
      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  22. N680SLI-DQ6 by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's a mother of a product name too.

    1. Re:N680SLI-DQ6 by cromar · · Score: 1

      You see this cat is a bad mother...
      (SHUT YO MOUTH)
      But I'm talkin' about N680SLI-DQ6
      (Then we can dig it)

    2. Re:N680SLI-DQ6 by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, I'm tempted to call the boards "fatherboards" just to see if it upsets someone.

      In some fairness to the naming, the first two thirds of the model number describes the chipset and main feature. I have no idea what "DQ6" is, maybe that's the type of Dairy Queen building that goes with the board.

    3. Re:N680SLI-DQ6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, ditto, since when did individual motherboards become news-worthy at Slashdot...? Nothing new here at all either.

  23. iSCSI SAN by doseyg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With 4 Gigabit ports and 10 sata slots this could make a nice cost-effective iSCSI SAN...

    1. Re:iSCSI SAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and yet, it is still too little to plug her pipe.

  24. Hey! by Jon.Laslow · · Score: 5, Funny

    rather than any genuine advantage).

    No need to turn this in to a Microsoft flame war! ^.^



    Good bye, sweet Karma....

    1. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no way it was hilarious dude

  25. FRY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh good, another board so idiot overclockers can prematurely destroy their hardware by burning it to cinders!

  26. Obligatory single page link by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    1. Re:Obligatory single page link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use IE, you deserve to crash. Simple enough.

    2. Re:Obligatory single page link by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA, you deserve to crash. Simple enough.

    3. Re:Obligatory single page link by AeroIllini · · Score: 1
      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    4. Re:Obligatory single page link by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      no, I'm at work

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    5. Re:Obligatory single page link by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      Except for when you're at work and you don't have access rights to install Firefox, and it takes a painfully long amount of time to launch Portable Firefox (it just isn't worth it if you're only going to be on for 2 seconds or skim the /. headlines). Would I much rather browse even just those 2 seconds with Firefox? Hell yes. But with the abominably slow machines many people are stuck on at work, I'd rather have /. in IE than no /. at all...

  27. And the next step from there... by Jon.Laslow · · Score: 1

    ...is to have dual computers.







    Wait....

  28. Doh! by langelgjm · · Score: 1

    Doh! You're right, even though they're the same length, one is 8x. Which begs the question even more, why?

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    1. Re:Doh! by kailoran · · Score: 1

      So you can put a 16x card in it - it will work, only get less bandwidth. You can do this with a 'standard' 8x slot too, but you would have to cut off part of the card's connector.

    2. Re:Doh! by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      The 8x slot is meant to use an extra nvidia graphics card as a physics accelerator in the future.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
  29. Two actually by geekoid · · Score: 1

    It's 2 16s and an 8

    however, to answer your bigger wuestion: There are cards other then video cards that use 16 PCI-eXpress.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  30. Bought one -- DOA by FreeKnight · · Score: 1

    Always had good luck with Gigabyte...bought one these and had to return it because it wouldn't POST. Too bad, looked like a nice unit. Bought an EVGA instead, which worked okay, BIOS updates a must though

  31. Query by dj_tla · · Score: 1

    I have a question, maybe a somewhat simple one, but I'll ask it nevertheless. What's the point of multiple PCI Express slots? I'm not aware of any devices other than video cards using PCI Express (though I could very easily be wrong). It's not possible to use two video cards at the same time, correct? Is this just looking towards the future when more devices will need to throughput offered by PCI Express?

    1. Re:Query by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ethernet and some wireless device are using it.
      More info:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_Express

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Query by g1zmo · · Score: 1

      Some HBAs and RAID controllers too.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
    3. Re:Query by ksandom · · Score: 1

      You most certainly can have multiple video cards in one system. Before dual head cards were common, I was running 4 monitors on a single computer. AGP was a pain because I think the spec only allowed one instance of AGP on a system. But that doesn't have to stop you from running other technologies such as PCI which I can assure you does work work in harmony with AGP as well as with itself.

      If you feel like giving it ago, you ought to play with it in X. You can do some really cool stuff like making a monitor essentially act as a zoom for the mouse cursor by overlapping a monitor set at a low resolution and having a high vertual resolution over the top of a monitor with set at the same resolution as the virtual resolution of the other monitor.
      Last time I tried that on a dual head card, it got very unhappy with me. Yet two cards working together with Xinerama worked very well as long as there was a very slight offset.

      Anyway, HTH.

      --
      Funnyhacks - Wierd, unusual, and fun hacks
    4. Re:Query by lagfest · · Score: 1

      It's not possible to use two video cards at the same time, correct?
      Wrong. You can use as many video cards as you have space for. It was the intention that PCI Express replaced both AGP and PCI. Some SATA/SCSI controllers, NICs and sound cards are available with PCIe.
    5. Re:Query by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It's not possible to use two video cards at the same time, correct?

      So, was the rent cheap for that rock you've been living under? 'Cause since you moved in, users have started hooking up multiple monitors to their PC, and some people even invented a little thing called SLI.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:Query by dj_tla · · Score: 1

      users have started hooking up multiple monitors to their PC


      Yeah, I do dual monitors with one video card, wasn't sure how easy it was to do dual monitors with two video cards. Cheers for the link to SLI though, that's really what I was most curious about.
    7. Re:Query by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I do dual monitors with one video card, wasn't sure how easy it was to do dual monitors with two video cards.

      Some people might also want to do 4 monitors on 2 video cards (or even have larger arrays of monitors). Matrox has specialized in this kind of thing for the past several years, since it can't make fast enough GPUs to compete in the gaming market.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:Query by theeddie55 · · Score: 1

      Hardware space isn't the only limiting factor, i know that windows 98 supported upto 9 monitors (that was fun) and i'm not aware that this limit has been extended in later versions of windows. As for other operating systems then i'm not sure and it's not often you get to experiment with these things. (though i used to work in a computer store and we used three computers and some virtual monitor software to make a 9 screen video wall)

    9. Re:Query by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Gigabit Ethernet cards sometimes use PCI-E because there is not much bandwidth left on a PCI bus with the network card using a whole Gb/s.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  32. memerized?? by xtracto · · Score: 1

    Sorry, could someone explain me where does this meme comes from? I think I lost that /. episode...

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    1. Re:memerized?? by Verteiron · · Score: 1
      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    2. Re:memerized?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cliche maybe.. not a meme

    3. Re:memerized?? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      It's a viral marketing campaign by a blender manufacturer

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Will_It_Blend%3F

      Viral marketing reminds me of a joke on I'm sorry I haven't a clue.

      Humphrey Lyttelton: [deadpan as usual] and if the contestants get it right they get a point and what do points mean?
      Audience: [a few scattered] "prizes?"
      Humphrey Lyttelton: [suddenly in talkshow host mode] Oh come on, you can do better than that! what do points mean?
      Audience: [unanimous shouting] POINTS MEAN PRIZES! POINTS MEAN PRIZES!
      Humphrey Lyttelton: [deadpan again] Bloody Nuremburg fodder.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  33. Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I can make a blazing fast ricer PC to match my souped up 2005 Handa Civic.

    Seriously, I wouldn't have expected /. to showcase a piece of hardware that only really appeals to Gamers who want to win this upgrade pissing contest every six months or so.

    1. Re:Sweet! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I wouldn't have expected /. to showcase a piece of hardware that only really appeals to Gamers who want to win this upgrade pissing contest every six months or so.

      "You must be new here"

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Sweet! by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I wouldn't have expected /. to showcase a piece of hardware that only really appeals to Gamers who want to win this upgrade pissing contest every six months or so.
      Obligatory:
      You must be new here. :-)
  34. Re:I WANT TO FUCK IT by AC-x · · Score: 1

    You must be thinking of those new iMacs

    (Ok not so new anymore but you get the idea)

  35. Who is this guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this guy from HotHardware is now Zonks new blow job buddy, eh? Just amazing how many stries he PIMPS to Slashdot.

  36. Re:I WANT TO FUCK IT by jamieswith · · Score: 1

    How, exactly is this informative?

    Besides telling us what kind of mental help it is that you nead?

  37. Just not worth it. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but as interesting as this board seems in the Slashvert for HotHardware, I can't take the site itself: Overclocked with nausiating ads, minimal actual story spread over way too many pages... They seem to be getting a lot of exposure on Slashdot, but it's just not worth it.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  38. Quad-Triple Phase power by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 4, Informative

    I recognize most of that stuff, but what is a 12-phase power array?

    Plz. ignore that nutcase below that refers to Wikipedia on 3-phase power, that's about something totally different. I suspect many /.'ers will have some understanding of electronics, but maybe less detailed than I assume. So I'll give it a go in layman's terms:

    What you're looking at is a DC step-down switching regulator circuit (look that up if you want). On most mobo's, it converts 12V to around 1,5V, at many, many Amperes (fist rule: power = voltage x amps).

    In it's most basic form, it consists of a coil, a (fast) switch, and a diode. The coil(s) are the thick copperwire/ceramic thingies on the board. As a switch, electronic versions known as power MOSFETs (usually black, square plastic thingies) are used. Because diodes have a small, but significant voltage drop when current passes through, this would give unacceptable losses (heat) at the high currents we have here. Therefore, another power MOSFET is used to replace the diode.

    Such a pair of MOSFETs is switched on and off quickly (10s or 100s thousands of times a second), with 1 in conducting (low resistance), and 1 in non-conducting (high resistance) state at any given moment. BUT: when switching over, there is some overlap, where both are somewhat conducting, causing a momentary 'short circuit' (=losses, waste heat). Enter 3-state: switch one off, wait very short to make sure the MOSFET goes fully into non-conducting state, and only THEN switch on the other MOSFET.

    My guess is this 'Quad-Triple Phase power' is a similar construction, but then 4 times, working in parallel (for more current), or alternating (to lengthen cooling periods between on-states). Basically: a high-current, energy-efficient 12V-to-CPU-voltage converter.

  39. One is better than two by durdur · · Score: 1

    Not being a gamer, I am really uninterested in multiple graphic card support. Fast CPU, good. Fast disks, good. Fast graphics, who cares. Doesn't make emacs go any faster ;-).

  40. Informative?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you'd said "I don't really understand, but I'll hand-wave and then diss it so I can at least open my fat mouth," that would have at least been informative as to your knowledge of the issues involved, but what you said? Christ.

  41. 100% solid-state capacitors by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cool! It's really getting hard to find the old vacuum tube caps I'm using now.

    Yeah, Yeah, Yeah, I read the article. Seems to me that electrolytic is kind of solid state, but I get the idea. Whatever happened to mica?

    --
    What?
    1. Re:100% solid-state capacitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, any kind of non-moving capacitor (eg solid state) is so much better than those rotating mass-type of energy storage devices I've been using for the last decade. Who knew they would be so popular?

  42. OC will predict its future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They compared it to the D975XBX2 which I have, and is a serious overclocking dynamo. The performance was basically a match not overclocked, and while the features on this board are interesting, we'll have to wait and see what the guys at xtremesystems and similar places can get this thing up to. If it OCs well it will could easily reach legendary status. In theory it sounds like it can go far, what with the solid-core caps and heatpiped NB, but you just never can tell from any specs how high a thing will overclock. Hell, taking one look at the D975XBX2 would tell any sane person that it's a budget board that won't overclock at all, but it's a real monster.

  43. Fuck It, We're Going To Three Slots by Looshi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Overheard at Gigabyte HQ...

    Would someone tell me how this happened? We were the fucking vanguard of PCI slots in this country. The one slot motherboard was the motherboard to own. Then the other guy came out with a two-slot SLI board. Were we scared? Hell, no. Because we hit back with a little thing called the 3 slot PCI-e motherboard....
  44. Hot hardware by Alioth · · Score: 1

    It's kind of fitting it's on a web site called 'Hot hardware'. With all those heatsinks, it must be horribly inefficient and heat generating!

  45. AnandTech reports 680i chipset issues by BcNexus · · Score: 1
    Have any Slashdotters had issues? AnandTech mentions issues users have them since November:

    Since the launch, most of the focus surrounding the 680i chipset changed from its impressive performance and flexibility to problems that seemed to plague the reference board designs from the launch partners such as EVGA and BFG and later on with in-house designs from ASUS and abit. These problems centered on audio issues when using SLI, as well as data corruption or severe performance loss when utilizing SATA drives on the reference boards. However, AnandTech does go on to say some issues have been solved:

    The audio issues were solved with a quick BIOS update...Several BIOS releases later and it seems as if the majority of data corruption issues with the reference boards have been cured. This sounds like a sweet silent PC or over-clocked PC board if it's stable now.
  46. Dude.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's only a single processor board. Nothing to get excited about.

    Now if it were a duallie quad core, well that's a totally different story.

    I wouldn't touch a 4 banger when "I could'a had a V8"

  47. Maybe I'm missing something, but... by NerveGas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... what, precisely, do you do with a desktop motherboard where you need four gigabit ethernet connections?

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    1. Re:Maybe I'm missing something, but... by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      what, precisely, do you do with a desktop motherboard where you need four gigabit ethernet connections?
      It's an end-of-life thing. This motherboard is for all those people who, when their computers become obsolete, they say, "Hey, let's just put OpenBSD on it and use it as a cheap home firewall/router. Take that, LinkSys!" Don't you wish your old 486 had 4 ethernet connections? ;-)
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    2. Re:Maybe I'm missing something, but... by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

      Many 486 systems have 6 or 7 ISA slots, and they do make 100MB ISA Nics. Take that. :P

    3. Re:Maybe I'm missing something, but... by Grey_14 · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly sure there are not 100mbit cards for ISA, I know there are billions of 10mbit ones, but I didn't think the ISA bus could manage 100mbit throughput...

      Fuck thats nitpicky, but I just had to say it.

    4. Re:Maybe I'm missing something, but... by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Two of them can be used as a 2Gb pseudo-trunk without having trunking support on the Gb switch supposedly. That might be handy for a media server or lan gaming server of some sort (you'd need a hell of a raid array to saturate a 2Gb network though!) Add in the need to act as a router for the rest of the network, or just the need to connect to two different networks (say, lan and a DMZ) and you need 3 gigabit ports.

      The 680i chipset comes with two nvidia Gb ports, and the pseudo trunking comes from 2 extra marvell controllers - thus the 4 ports, the 2 nvidia ports are 'free' in a sense. Besides, home networks are getting bigger and more complex all the time - beats having to buy pci-e x1 network cards (about the only slots available between sli graphic cards)!

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  48. it does thanks to the retro encabulator by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    and the new Turboencabulator.

    But you know, electrical engineers will appreciate the difficulty of nubbing together a regurgitative purwell and a superaminative wennel-sprocket. Indeed, this proved to be a stumbling block to further development until, in 1943, it was found that the use of anhydrous nagling pins enabled a kyptonastic boiling shim to be tankered.

  49. 100% solid-state capacitors! by old+and+new+again · · Score: 1

    finally, out with the 62% tube based capacitors!

  50. MY favorite from the article by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    you may notice that this board is equipped with nothing but solid capacitors; no electrolytic caps are to be found.
    I guess the reviewer knows nothing about electronics as the board is littered with surface mount crimp style electrolytic caps.

    I love it when reviewers make things up because they are running out of things to say.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  51. Underpowered piece of crap by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    If it doesn't have four processor sockets and room for 32GB of RAM, what good is it?

    --
    That is all.
  52. Solid state capacitors = article written by dimwit by Prune · · Score: 0, Troll

    The photographs show the board covered with typical surface mount electrolytic capacitors, just like the ones in my last order from Digikey. So not only did the guy confuse solid-state with surface mount, but incorrectly claimed they weren't electrolytic capacitors. I've been on /. for a few years now, and this is one of the dumbest things I've seen yet. Congratulations /. on reaching deep new lows!

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  53. Yes you do. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Software RAID will never result in your data becoming unavailable because of failures in infrastructure (other than the disks themselves).
    Buy two or four drives for your infrastructure server, and set them up as mirrored/striped in the OS. A dead simple proposal with little performance degradation (at least, when using SATA or SCSI).

    Although I wouldn't do RAID5 or RAID6 in software. That's what external storage devices are for... full embedded devices with monitoring, support contracts, etc.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  54. Re:Solid state capacitors = article written by dim by arkhan_jg · · Score: 2, Informative
    You twit. http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Motherboard/Pr oducts_Overview.aspx?ProductID=2553&ModelName=GA-N 680SLI-DQ6

    The Industry's Leading All-Solid Capacitor motherboard Design
    To ensure a longer for systems in daily operation and boost system stability under extreme conditions, this platform adopts cutting-edge Conductive Polymer Aluminum Solid Capacitors from the world's leading vendors. With these high-quality components , users can take advantage of better electronic conductivity and excellent heat resistance for enhanced system durability. There are indeed 100% non-electrolytic capacitors on this board, despite what it 'looks' like to you. There's even a pretty sticker on the box saying 100% solid capacitors. It's not like it's a hugely rare feature these days, other boards have 100% solid caps too, like the ASUS P5N32 SLI PLUS.

    http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?Pr oductCode=242713

    Gigabyte GA-N680SLI-DQ6 nForce 680i SLI Socket 775 1333MHz DDR2-800 Motherboard Retail ***Free Shipping***
    800/1066/1333FSB, ATA/133, 4DDR2 DIMM, 2 PCI Express x16, 1 PCI Express x8, 1 PCI Express x1, 3PCI, USB 2.0/1.1, IEEE 1394a, Audio, Quad Gigabit LAN, RAID/SATA, eSATA
    Features exclusive Silent Pipe II fanless cooling technology and 100% solid capacitors
    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  55. Re:solid-state capacitors- should be "solid electr by whit3 · · Score: 1

    >It is some journalist mambo-jumbo. The motherboard uses some non-electrolytic capacitors
    >( the brown boxes near CPU socket ) I believe that those are multilayer ceramic capacitors.
    >The rest just look like regular SMD aluminium electrolytic capacitors

    They ARE aluminum, and they are electrolytic, but the electrolyte isn't a liquid, it's a solid.
    The solid-electrolyte capacitors are more expensive, more reliable and also more durable,
    so will take higher temperatures. They are said to completely eliminate leakage-of-goo
    failures.

    For reference, Nichicon solid-electrolyte 6.3V 470 uF LF series capacitors sell for $0.75 and
    an equivalent with liquid-goo electrolyte ( PW series) is $0.18. Those are prices in hundred
    quantity, from DigiKey. The price premium was much worse a few years ago, so we're going
    to see this feature on lots of logic boards.

  56. Thro some D's on that bitch by gelfling · · Score: 2

    Seriously, they just heaped features on this thing for bragging rights. What are you going to do - turn this into a one box data center?

  57. But the best part is... by DJ_Maiko · · Score: 1

    ...the cooling technology that's going into it!

    Screw how many pci slots it has! I live in a warm climate w/no AC so my rig can get kinda warm so I don't overclock. But the cooling technology of cooling 2 different parts of the board is brilliant! I've been hoping for this for a long time. Engineers thinking outside the box (no pun intended) is where it's at, yo!

    --
    Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever. -Mahatma Ghandi
  58. Re:Solid state capacitors = article written by dim by Prune · · Score: 1

    You idiot, doesn't matter if it's solid or not, it's still electrolytic. These use solid electrolyte. The full name is still "Aluminum electrolytic solid (conductive polymer) capacitors", as you'll see written on the websites of typical manufacturers of such capacitors: http://www.rubycon.co.jp/en/pc-con/index.html (Rubycon is one of the biggest capacitor manufacturers). More solid conductive polymer capacitors that point out they are still electrolytic: http://www.garrettelec.com/weblog/2007/06/aluminum _electrolytic_capacito_1.html Another of the capacitor manufacturing giants: http://www.nichicon-us.com/english/products/pdf/e- cg.pdf "CONDUCTIVE POLYMER
    ALUMINUM SOLID ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORS"

    So, I've proven you're as full of shit as the original article.

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  59. Re:Solid state capacitors = article written by dim by Prune · · Score: 1

    Mod parent down, solid conductive polymer capacitors are still electrolytic, as a quick search of the literature would reveal! The conductive polymer is a solid electrolyte; the principle of operation is still the same.

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  60. Re:Solid state capacitors = article written by dim by Prune · · Score: 1

    Why was I modded down? Did anyone actually check the post of the idiot that replied to me? The conductive polymer capacitors are still electrolytic, despite the electrolyte being a solid. Major capacitor manufacturers still call these electrolytic capacitors:

    Some examples from big manufacturing companies that call solid conductive polymer capacitors electrolytic: "Aluminum electrolytic solid (conductive polymer) capacitors" according to http://www.rubycon.co.jp/en/pc-con/index.html or how about http://www.garrettelec.com/weblog/2007/06/aluminum _electrolytic_capacito_1.html and http://www.nichicon-us.com/english/products/pdf/e- cg.pdf says they are "CONDUCTIVE POLYMER ALUMINUM SOLID ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORS"

    As you can see, my post was modded down unfairly, and I deserve some reprieve.

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  61. All fixed-value capacitors are "solid state" by gweihir · · Score: 1

    This is BS. Electrolyte capacitors are "solid state", i.e. without moving parts. What you want in durable electronics no electrolyte capacitors or only high-durability ones with good cooling.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:All fixed-value capacitors are "solid state" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the electrolyte was a liquid aluminum salt paste.

  62. Gigabyte? Not interested by AbRASiON · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gigabyte have attempted MULTIPLE times to extort money from me for a product under warranty.
    They flat out refuse to honour the warranty without payment on a video card - it's STILL under warranty and broken in my drawer at work.
    I'd rather stick with Asus or MSI or well,,, anyone but Gigabyte.

    Oh and the amazing overclocking Gigabyte DS3? Yeah, not so much, go search on google for the 'post bug' problems where it refuses to re-boot even if the overclock was stable for a week, or it re-boots itself at the post stage multiple times for no apparent reason - very flakey - very cheap - not interested.

    1. Re:Gigabyte? Not interested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In defense of the board. I had the reboot problem when I was overclocking and *thought* the system was stable. However, the stability tests I ran only stress the processor and not the entire system. You need to up the voltage to the FSB, MCH, RAM, etc. After doing that, I was able to run a 4300 at 3.8GHz and a 6600 at 3.4GHz without the BIOS setting reset problem. The 965P-DS3 is a real gem as it is inexpensive and has so much potential. You and others complain out of frustration because you do not know what you are doing.

    2. Re:Gigabyte? Not interested by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      LOL I don't know what I'm doing, ok - I've only been overclocking hardware for 15 years.

      Oh and the FSB MCH and RAM had voltage increases but nice try! - register an account next time dipshit.

  63. Goodbye 2nd qtr bonus by Telepathetic+Man · · Score: 1

    I get my profit-sharing bonus next week too. I guess I know where its going. When is it on the market?
    It sounds like a good Never Winter Nights 2 server.

    --
    Just because you can, does not mean you should.
  64. But are they lying about RAM support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found that Gigabyte have stated that they support >4GB RAM where they actually only support about 3.5GB or even 3GB due to not having a memory hole or 'memory re-map' function in the BIOS. This site has details:

    http://digitalconsumption.com/forum/Gigabyte-GA965 PDS4-with-3GB-or-4GB-RAM-Memory-Hole

  65. Motherboard Pricing by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or are Intel chipset motherboards CRAZY expensive? All the enthusiast level boards are >$200. Which is crazy.

    I have three friends (None are particularly broke) waiting for a killer motherboard to build a rig...

    Intel get your house in order, Nvidia is eating you from the inside with motherboards that are more expensive than your processors.

    SLI is overrated, especially with the dearth of decent mid range graphics cards...

    Components are getting better but they're making it such a pain to put together a decent mid range system this generation, there aren't any new features (Same old raid setups, NCQ, PCI-E, DDR2 etc are old hat)... so why the sudden increase in motherboard prices...

  66. Update: No, bad, don't want by Telepathetic+Man · · Score: 1

    The thing is almost 6 months old and is still $285+. Plus it seems difficult to find at a physical store. I hate the possible hassle of a return to an on-line shop.

    --
    Just because you can, does not mean you should.
  67. Re:Solid state capacitors = article written by dim by adolf · · Score: 1

    But more important than their exact composition is the question of how well they fare over the long term.

    I've thrown away at least a dozen motherboards with nothing at all wrong with them, except for a few bad capacitors, all within the last 5 or so years.

    I recently fixed a not-too-old series 2 tivo which had a few bulging capacitors in its power supply. This was mostly interesting because all of the obviously broken caps were of the same brand, while the other 4 or 5 brands of caps on that board appeared to be OK.

    So: Does this solid conductive polymer capacitor improve reliability? If not, are there any advantages to the technology other than being newly marketable?

  68. Does it run LinuxBIOS? by billybob2 · · Score: 1

    Another Gigabyte motherboard (Gigabyte M57SLI-S4) does run LinuxBIOS, and is one of the only desktop motherboards to do so. It would be cool if the most performat desktop motherboard in existense also ran a 100% Free/Open Source BIOS such as LinuxBIOS.

  69. Read the NEGATIVE reviews first. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Before getting excited about this motherboard, read the reviews: Customer Reviews for GIGABYTE GA-N680SLI-DQ6.

    Samples:

    "The creator of these [this] BIOS is still living in the 1990's."

    "In an attempt to RMA this board with Newegg, they stated that this board has been discontinued by the manufacturer, thus I got a 100% refund. But apparently after more research, there are 2 versions of this board."

    "It runs WAY TOO HOT..."

  70. Open box offers. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Also, note all the open box offers at the bottom here: Gigabyte Intel Processors.

    They are getting so many returns that there is a long list. May be a bad indication, depending on how the web site works concerning open box offers.

    1. Re:Open box offers. by camperslo · · Score: 1

      They are getting so many returns that there is a long list. May be a bad indication, depending on how the web site works concerning open box offers.

      Perhaps some people hoping to run (patched) OS X on it have had poor luck.

  71. You're Forgetting the Rest of the Feature List by lordSaurontheGreat · · Score: 1

    Gentlemen, it's a nuclear device. As you'll see here, pressing this red button will detonate the BIOS, sending a massive wave of total apathy throughout the entire Internet and thus destroying the world.
    Oh, wait, everyone is already terminally apathetic.

    --
    Consider yourself spoken to.
  72. Linux uncompatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Marvell LAN chips don't have Linux drivers

    1. Re:Linux uncompatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of the sky2 driver? It is included in the kernel and supports Marvell LAN chips. The driver works perfectly on my Gigabyte 965P-DS3.

  73. simple answers... by CodyRazor · · Score: 1

    I have had one of these for a few months... maybe they just came out in America? anyway i think its brilliant.... 10 sata ports are fantastic, i have 6 hard drives iv accumulated for storing media on, (all legal of course...) and with most motherboards this is a pain since 4 sata ports or even 6 is limiting especially with the extremely low prices of hard drives these days. and for the person asking why you cant just use controller cards and set it up how you like, after you have 2 graphics cards in sli theres one pcie-1 and 1 pci slot left, i need one for sound. that leaves one pcie for a controller card, a 4 port sata card in aus is from memory over AU$200. Thats half the price of the motherboard. 8 port is like $500. if you need anything else like tv tuner, too bad. i think there really isn't enough room for slots on motherboards these days, and why isn't everyone using pci-e?! motherboard manufacturers seem to think they are! the pci-e 8x slot is for the fabled physics cards that are (supposedly) coming out. or in the case of the other theory for a third graphics card dedicated to physics. Futureproofing is good. the 4 gigabit lan ports you could say are good for using teaming on two connections... but really its just for bragging rights, 2 really is enough for nearly everyone i think. but if your buying a top of the line motherboard its nice to get extras. being able to plug in and out my xbox, ps3 or whatever without disturbing other ethernet connections is nice tho, or if i just need to hook up a laptop to transfer files or something. the only thing iv noticed is that the heatsink array gets VERY VERY hot, like you cant touch it without getting burned hot, but it hasn't caused me any problems yet and i have it overclocked a fair bit. im worried the extreme heat from the northbridge and back of the cpu might heat up the southbridge... but no problems yet. Most people wont use half the features, but most people shouldn't spend AU$450 on a motherboard. Its there for people who need it like me.

    --
    So Skulldilocks threw acid on the schoolchildrens' faces, cause somebody from the bible told her to do it!
    1. Re:simple answers... by Conor+Turton · · Score: 1

      10 sata ports are fantastic, i have 6 hard drives iv accumulated for storing media on, What the hell for? Unless you're unemployed, you'll never have enough time to watch/listen to it all. And I'd rather pop a DVD in a player and watch it on a fullsized TV with a proper surround sound system than on my PC even though it has a 24" widescreen monitor.
      --
      Conor "You're not married,you haven't got a girlfriend and you've never seen Star Trek? Good Lord!" - Patrick Stewart
    2. Re:simple answers... by CodyRazor · · Score: 1

      you must be busy... i work full time and do various other things... and i have plenty of time to watch it. not all of us can afford a nice big tv, so my 24" monitor in 1080p will do fine. i do have a projector hooked up to it too. not all of us are home owners some are poor young people in an apartment. as i live in an apartment my sound system is hooked up to my pc... if you'd rather find a dvd and pop it into a player thats fine, id rather click my mouse a few times. plus we cant all afford a roomful of dvds... i saw the x-files collection for $1000. honestly whos going to buy that?

      --
      So Skulldilocks threw acid on the schoolchildrens' faces, cause somebody from the bible told her to do it!
  74. Re:Solid state capacitors = article written by dim by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

    solid polymer capacitors are much more reliable than liquid electrolytics. I too have had problems with bad liquid electrolytic capacitors, which is why I stick to solid polymer capacitors these days.

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  75. Re:Solid state capacitors = article written by dim by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

    Sigh. You've missed the point entirely. People use electrolytic to mean 'electrolyte soaked paper layer capacitors' which are prone to failure, especially if its one of the capacitors manufactured with a bad liquid electrolyte formula. Solid alumninum polymer capacitors are far more reliable - which when you're buying motherboards, is quite important; definitely so if you've had bad liquid-electrolytic capacitors fail in the past, as I have.

    I thought you were arguing that it had liquid (i.e. non-solid polymer) electrolytic capacitors on this board, and used the same shorthand in return. I now see you were arguing the technical difference between a true non-electrolytic capacitor and the whole class of solid and non-solid electrolytic capacitors. For this mistake, I apologise - it was your use of 'typical surface mount capacitors' that threw me - solid polymer capacitors are anything but typical, liquid electrolytics are. I must admit, I'm not aware of any motherboard that uses true non-electrolytic capacitors completely, the capacitance per unit volume is just too useful in small spaces.

    For calling you a twit, I stand by. What people want to know is whether the board is prone to failure due to physical liquid electrolyte breakdown and leakage. That problem is largely resolved by solid polymer capacitors. That it is still - technically - an electrolytic capacitor is a point not relevant to anyone not an electrical engineer - as most enthusiasts are not.

    You might have avoided the original post's troll mod if you had phrased your post differently; bemoaned the articles misuse of the term non-electrolytic to refer to solid-state electrolytic capacitors rather than going on a rant about surface mount and calling him a dimwit. Call me as full of shit as you wish, but the common usage of electrolytic to stand in for failure-prone liquid electrolytic isn't going to disappear just by insulting me.

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  76. Reminds me of by Britz · · Score: 1
  77. Marvell / Sky2 ? by alexandre · · Score: 1

    Marvell cards are the one with the Sky2 driver right? Which is flaky (not to say crappy...) but i heard there is another module available. (binary?)

    In any case, i wouldn't buy such a mobo if i was to use those 4 cards if i knew it would have flaky driver supports, a crashing router is annoying ;-)

    If they can get realtek or other well supported cards inside, i'm all in!

  78. 6-drive RAID by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Why stick so many ports (4x LAN, 10x SATA) on the motherboard? Is there a performance benefit to putting those ports there, instead of providing lots of PCI slots so you can create your own optimal mix of ports? Unfortunately, they don't go into much depth about the SATA features other than:

    All of the nForce 680i SLI's inherent features are exploited on this board, so there is a wealth of USB and SATA connectors available (which support various RAID modes), but not all of the SATA ports are linked via a single controller. The 6 main ports are powered by the 680i chipset and support multiple RAID modes, but the purple ports along the bottom edge come by way of a pair of individual controllers and arrays can't be built across them; individually they do support two-drive RAID, however.
    So you can do one 6-drive RAID and two 2-drive RAIDs, but not one 10-drive RAID.

    What else were other comments about included cabling and eSATA backplanes. Their test systems only used one 10KRPM SATA hard drive.
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  79. excuse me ? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Where do you see these "surface mount crimp style electrolytic caps" ?

    Or do you mean these perhaps? Which are not caps ...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..