Slashdot Mirror


Harry Potter Leaked Via Handheld Camera

owlgorithm writes "Salon reports that Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows has been leaked four days before it hits bookstores. It turns out that someone with access to the American edition of the book has taken a photograph of every one of the pages and made them available via bittorrent. Publishers may well be quaking in their boots, but in some places the quality is barely legible. On many pages the pirateer's hands are in the pictures with other pages needing a bit of Photoshopping just to make out the words. It appears many of the sites have been removing the content, naturally enough."

427 comments

  1. So? by Macgruder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    so? it's not like it's worth anything. Labor intensive, to boot

    --
    I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    1. Re:So? by Jansingal · · Score: 1

      Someone has way too much time on their hands. But more importantly..... DOES HARRY DIE?

    2. Re:So? by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 4, Informative
    3. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      lol. I've been spamming this stuff for days and getting modded -1 troll, now it's informative?

    4. Re:So? by Shinmizu · · Score: 1

      I didn't see on what page Jar-Jar died. Don't tell me they killed off Dobby but left Jar-Jar alive. I am absolutely not buying another Harry Potter book after this one!!

    5. Re:So? by World.Pop(MPAA) · · Score: 1

      I only wish...

    6. Re:So? by nightcats · · Score: 1

      As the Stanford boys Branford and Beckstrom would say, this is a starfish moment. Rowling and her pubs are finding out what the RIAA has discovered: that when you stir up hype and then enforce obedience and secrecy, you're asking for trouble from all those people who aren't in on the take. As I mention at the blog, it's one of those feed-the-kids-sugar-and-then-spank-them-for-acting -up scenarios. So, will I be reading it anyway this weekend? You bet.

      --
      Development is programmable; Discovery is not programmable. (Fuller)
    7. Re:So? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You just saved me 20 bucks and 5 hours.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    8. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah, you just aren't as reader friendly as you once were.

  2. and it won't cost them by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    a single sale.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:and it won't cost them by compro01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      actually, i wouldn't be entirely surprised if this is intentional. take pics, deliberately making most of them (all the really interesting/important parts) illegible, put it on every torrent site from here to Des Moines, and build a little(?) more hype for the big release at midnight on the 21st.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:and it won't cost them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely, but you can bet they'll say it did if the book doesn't sell twice as many copies as the last book.

    3. Re:and it won't cost them by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's my thinking, PR Stunt.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:and it won't cost them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      On the contrary,

      the publisher and author are claiming losses of 68 trillion US Dollars in US sales alone because of the leak.

      They figured the number based on the claims made by software and Music publishers over the past few years.

      Unfortunately now, every man woman and child in the UK will now have no electricity, heat, water or spicy food for 15 years because of this. The economic destruction that it will cause will probably bring the roman empire back to london, Make all beer taste sour, and disrupt peace in the middle east.

      See how damaging Piracy is!! SEE!

    5. Re:and it won't cost them by seaturnip · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By now the book has been distributed widely in preparation for the release, coming into contact with large numbers of people many of which are Harry Potter fans who don't take corporate secrecy particularly seriously. This was likely to leak just as critics' movie screeners, and published-submitted videogames commonly leak.

      There's no cause to believe the PR people did anything intentionally -- any marketer would have to be a total fool to attempt such a risky trick on a book guaranteed to sell millions anyway. If it backfired, his ass is fired.

    6. Re:and it won't cost them by superphreak · · Score: 1

      From here to Des Moines? Depending on where you're coming from, that's not very far. That's only ~4 hours south of here. ;)
      Might want to expand a bit.

      --
      Evolution is a state-sponsored, state-protected religion.
    7. Re:and it won't cost them by compro01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      how would this backfire if the book is going to sell millions anyway?

      i highly doubt that someone will just download this and not bother with the book.

      there may not be any value added with a movie or a game (there might even be negative value added with DRM or copy protection), but a book is substantially better than these pictures.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    8. Re:and it won't cost them by Trogre · · Score: 1

      How do you figure? Are you seriously telling me that not one person is going to read this (badly) scanned work and, when the book proper comes out, decide they've "done that" and no longer want to own it?

      No one is going to attempt an OCR on it and upload it in Plucker format, or HTML? I read most of my books on my PDA these days...

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    9. Re:and it won't cost them by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      and it won't cost them a single sale. Actually, it did. Me. I'm unsatisfied with how the book ends. (No, I won't tell you how...)

      I'm one of those oddballs that enjoys knowing how a book ends before I read it all the way through; If I know certain characters don't show up in the final scene, I'm on edge throughout the whole book wondering when they die or otherwise drop out. That's where I get my suspense.

      Mind you, I haven't actually read the book; A close friend read it, and I asked him for a summary at lunch today.
    10. Re:and it won't cost them by Shakrai · · Score: 1, Funny

      bring the roman empire back to london, Make all beer taste sour

      How is that different from British beer now? *duck*

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    11. Re:and it won't cost them by seaturnip · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The sales could be a few million less than predicted by analysts -- for whatever reason, it doesn't even have to be due to the leak -- then the publisher's stock would go down, and the guy who decided to implement the wildly unconventional marketing technique would be the scapegoat. Your conspiracy theory just doesn't jibe with the cover-your-ass mentality in large corporations.

    12. Re:and it won't cost them by McFadden · · Score: 4, Funny

      how would this backfire if the book is going to sell millions anyway?
      Well it'll piss off a lot of fans (not that I'm one personally) when some prick decides to do a 'drive-by spoilering' outside a bookstore on launch night so that he can video it for youtube.
    13. Re:and it won't cost them by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      a single preorder there, Fixed it for you
    14. Re:and it won't cost them by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      how would this backfire if the book is going to sell millions anyway?

      If the publisher authorised someone to put copies of the book, no matter how degraded, freely available on the Inernet, it would be difficult for take anyone who pirated their books to court. Though legally, their copyright is not diminished by doing this, any calculation of damages and punishment for offenders will be severely reduced. NO one with the authority to do this would do it.

      Besides, the publicity level is already saturated. Every news outlet in the world has at least one Potter story every day now.

    15. Re:and it won't cost them by KermodeBear · · Score: 1
      --
      Love sees no species.
    16. Re:and it won't cost them by compro01 · · Score: 1

      makes sense. i'm not a very "corperately minded" type.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    17. Re:and it won't cost them by geekoid · · Score: 1

      OK, so you are basing you opinion on a summary from a friend...oooK, fine.
      But don't tell me it cost a sale when we both know damn well you would have read the ending at the book store and still not purchased it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re:and it won't cost them by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Well, that view is wrong.
      It's not often a 'view'can be wrong, but look at books pre-internet.
      Same thing, but on a much smaller scale. SOme people liked to know the end, some people liked to read a book first and tell other people about it.

      TAndrew )'Hehir puts too much stock into the internet and it's influence. All's it does is amplify the way people have always acted.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    19. Re:and it won't cost them by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Before the internet, a professional critic did not need to refrain from mentioning plot points in order to placate a fan-base.

    20. Re:and it won't cost them by nneonneo · · Score: 1

      TFA suggests that OCR would be quite difficult, as the pages are, in places, partly obscured by the hand which holds them, and is being taken from a rather low-resolution camera.

      If you want a book, buy it.

    21. Re:and it won't cost them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shit, man, I'm making a spoiler-filled sandwich board and wearing it to the midnight release at B&N.

    22. Re:and it won't cost them by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Indeed:

      FTFS: "Publishers may well be quaking in their boots"

      Why are they quaking in their boots? Do they expect parents to download the poorly shot torrent and print it on their home printer for their kid's next birthday? Come on, now.

      (not to mention it'll come out something like few times the price of the original book)

    23. Re:and it won't cost them by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't go through such an elaborate funhouse of -- for lack of a better word, 'magical' -- protections and secrets that only serve as a challenge.

      You would not have people driving by bookstores come saturday shouting out the ending if Rowling didn't start the whole mess. I'd like to thank her for ensuring Anonymous aided me in enjoying the book a week before everyone else.

    24. Re:and it won't cost them by Yakman · · Score: 1

      ..or wait until Sunday when someone who has bought a copy from the store has cut the binding off and scanned / OCR'd it with some proper equipment.

    25. Re:and it won't cost them by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      OK, so you are basing you opinion on a summary from a friend...oooK, fine. What's wrong with that? It's called "word of mouth", and it's a far more effective advertising medium for good products when one is looking for dedicated customers. If you didn't believe that word-of-mouth recommendations had any value, you wouldn't be reading Slashdot comments. (Mind you, I'm not suggesting that you take Slashdot comments at face value...Sometimes one reads a comment to learn what not to think.)

      But don't tell me it cost a sale when we both know damn well you would have read the ending at the book store and still not purchased it. You don't know anything about my purchasing habits. I'll typically buy a book online, then lend it out to people until it doesn't get returned. Amazon.com and bn.com aren't really conducive to reviewing a book prior to purchase, so I rely on other folks' discussions of the books. And I've never been disappointed.
    26. Re:and it won't cost them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all the copies are of low quality...

      I've seen one that appear to be completely retyped out into Courier font.

    27. Re:and it won't cost them by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, that would be (and probably will be) hilarious.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    28. Re:and it won't cost them by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      We already know the most important spoilers, namely that Hermione's a dude and Voldemort is the ghost of Harry's father that has a sled named Rosebud.

    29. Re:and it won't cost them by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, but probably they are outnumbered by the people who get interested because of this leak.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    30. Re:and it won't cost them by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      On the other hand; ROMAN ORGIES!

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    31. Re:and it won't cost them by Zanthor · · Score: 1

      This book is ALL I've heard about from my girlfriend and her fellow harry potter nuts for months... it needs no extra hype!

      -- In Des Moines --

      --

      Zanthor

    32. Re:and it won't cost them by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Don't forget JK Rowling waking up next to Suzanne Pleshette and realizing it was all a dream and she's really not the richest woman in Britain.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    33. Re:and it won't cost them by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, my daughter will like having a pile of loose leaf around. Real easy for her to handle and read.

      About the only reason to d/l such a beast would be to take with you on a portable. I've done this with the Herbert Dune books. Have the paperbacks at home and copy on my work machine, for when slashdot's dull.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    34. Re:and it won't cost them by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      What if I wait to purchase the book until it's at my local grocery store, on their $5.99 table? That's where we've bought the previous 6 books. Are the publishers baking in their quoots about that?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    35. Re:and it won't cost them by trashbat · · Score: 1

      Or, they could have hired somebody else (e.g. a Harry Potter fanfic writer) to write an alternative version, and then 'leaked' that. Then there would be less incentive for somebody to leak it for real.

      That's probably just wishful thinking on my part though, having tried (and failed) to read this discussion without taking in any of the spoilers!

    36. Re:and it won't cost them by jc42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shit, man, I'm making a spoiler-filled sandwich board and wearing it to the midnight release at B&N.

      Make several of them, with incompatible spoilers, and switch back and forth every few minutes.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    37. Re:and it won't cost them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm assuming you don't live in Des Moines.

    38. Re:and it won't cost them by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Or, they could have hired somebody else (e.g. a Harry Potter fanfic writer) to write an alternative version, and then 'leaked' that. Then there would be less incentive for somebody to leak it for real.

      I've heard rumors that there were, at least with one of the earlier books, not sure about this one, a few alternate endings leaked or distributed at different points in the publishing process. Not sure if there's any hard evidence on that, though.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    39. Re:and it won't cost them by sousoux · · Score: 1

      the publisher and author are claiming losses of 68 trillion US Dollars in US sales alone because of the leak. They figured the number based on the claims made by software and Music publishers over the past few years.

      Music and software can be copied perfectly. A written book is a lot harder (unless transcribed). Most will wish to read the real thing and not blurry photos of pages.

  3. heh by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Crappy cam quality. Can't they telesync a book nowadays?
    Oh wait...

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:heh by un1xl0ser · · Score: 3, Informative

      A telesync is normally an improvement of sound quality by syncing either the FM broadcast for the hearing impaired (or at a drive-in), or directly into the soundboard. Sometimes the reason that they got a soundboard feed is because they are a projectionist, which is why the video quality may be improved, but this isn't always the case. I think that you mean a dvdscr or dvdrip. :-)

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    2. Re:heh by grub · · Score: 1

      I meant telecine. :)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:heh by un1xl0ser · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    4. Re:heh by Ubitsa_teh_1337 · · Score: 1

      That's ironic, considering the telesync of the movie was released on the interwebs today also. But everyone already knows the ending for the movie, of course.

    5. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you realise he was joking... that would pin the blame on the people that gave you +4 informative :P

    6. Re:heh by krazo · · Score: 1

      If only there were a method to transform an image of a book into a symbolic representation of its content . . .

      Perhaps an electronic tool that allowed manual input of the alphabet. That would be the key.

    7. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The telesync was out opening day if you're on any decent private tracker :)

    8. Re:heh by jZnat · · Score: 1

      What do video framerates have to do with books? (Telecine is a method of changing a film's original framerate (e.g., 24000/1001 fps) to a different one (e.g., NTSC 30000/1001 fps (or 60), or PAL 25 fps (or 50)))

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    9. Re:heh by grub · · Score: 1


      Telecine is used to transfer film to video. You're thinking of pulldown which isn't always necessary.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
  4. And who saw that ending coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean... Harry Potter is Luke Skywalker's father?!

    1. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Damn you! You're supposed to put SPOILER in big letters or ROT13 your post when you give away the ending like that, you insensitive clod!

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    2. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I double ROT13'd it, and I put SPOILER in spoiler tags, which must've made them invisible.

    3. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by gbobeck · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must have read the UK version. From what I read, at the end Harry wakes up after being in a coma for 7 years and realizes that the past 6 books were all a dream.

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    4. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by McFadden · · Score: 1

      [blockquote]I mean... Harry Potter is Luke Skywalker's father?![/blockquote] Don't joke. The way with the ridiculous bullshit Lucas writes these days, you might have given away the plot of the TV series.

    5. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That raises an interesting question. Is the Vader thing still a spoiler?

      On the one hand, it's something like 20 years old.

      On the other hand, the Star Wars movies have become pop classics, and cultural icons. Thus, it is safe to assume that many people of each generation will want to watch them, and so we should try not to spoil it.

      But wait...what order will they watch them? If they start with TPM, then they are going to already know about Vader when they get to the "I am your father" scene. It is no spoiler.

      However, many of them will be lucky enough to have someone tell them the right way to watch the movies. (Start with ANH, and go forward until "I am your father", then gosub to TPM, AotC, and RotS to get the story behind Vader, then return and finish the series). It would be a spoiler for these people.

      I think the Harry Potter books and/or films might end up in a similar position.

      The rule should probably be that for any story (whether book, movie, comic, erotic flip book, whatever), you don't give away story details that might be spoilers unless you are sure you have an audience that already knows, or won't care.

    6. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by eln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, but if a movie has been out for more than 3 or 4 months, you can't reasonably expect people to avoid mentioning spoilers about it. It cripples the conversation too much if you have to constantly be worried about "spoiling" a movie that's already out on DVD for someone. Seriously, if they really cared that much they probably would have seen it in the theatre.

      If you're the kind of person who finds it impossible to enjoy any movie if you know how it ends, I would suggest either seeing every movie on opening night or learning to live with disappointment.

    7. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by glwtta · · Score: 1

      The rule should probably be that for any story (whether book, movie, comic, erotic flip book, whatever), you don't give away story details that might be spoilers unless you are sure you have an audience that already knows, or won't care.

      Or, alternatively, how about we get a grip and just discuss things normally (after they've been out for a couple of weeks or so, if it's a very "high profile" item) and then those who have not seen/read the piece in question can remove themselves from the conversation if they are afraid of finding out more than they wanted to?

      This whole "spoiler" obsession is way out of control - I get that sometimes there are enjoyably surprising elements, but to say that the whole work is ruined if you knew some plot detail before hand... well, that doesn't speak highly of the work as a whole (not always true, of course).

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    8. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      That raises an interesting question. Is the Vader thing still a spoiler? When I saw Empire Strikes Back, it was on TV, and I wasn't aware of that 'twist.' Growing up now, however, it would be very hard to avoid references to it in popular culture. How many other works of fiction have included 'I am your father' parodies? The same is true of Soylent Green. With things like Futurama including lines like 'Soylent Green is my kind of people,' it's hard not to know the twist in that film.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by Scooter's_dad · · Score: 1

      That's fine if you're talking about adults, but I want my three year old daughter to be surprised when Vader lays the awful truth on Luke. And I want her to be surprised when she finds out how the Harry Potter series ends, and who Norman Bate's mother is, and why Soylent Green is so damned tasty, and what Rosebud has to do with winter sports... Who said parenting would be easy.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with Cat 5 cable.
    10. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by bint · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However, many of them will be lucky enough to have someone tell them the right way to watch the movies. (Start with ANH, and go forward until "I am your father", then gosub to TPM, AotC, and RotS to get the story behind Vader, then return and finish the series). It would be a spoiler for these people.

      No, the right way is obviously not to watch TPM, AtoC and RotS at all. And live happily ever after.

    11. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree completely.

      I have never seen the first 3 Star Wars movies (4,5,6) but i do know the spoiler.

      I have to admit that finding it out the normal way would have been rather nice.

      Then again, Romeo dies at the end and so does Juliet. I didn't have to read the book to know that.

      Guess you have to be in the right time and in the right place for it to be a spoiler.

      Just my 2 cents

      ps. im 25 years old and never seen the first 3 movies, sorry.
      pss. i visit /. everyday, i just dont have an account.
      psss. first post ever

    12. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by sharkey · · Score: 1

      So JK being shot was all a dream?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    13. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the Star Wars movies have become pop classics, and cultural icons. Thus, it is safe to assume that many people of each generation will want to watch them, and so we should try not to spoil it.

      But wait...what order will they watch them? 4, 5, 6, period. Do not be tempted to mod me down, fanboys. Search your feelings, you know this to be true.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    14. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      *waves hand*. "There were only 3 Star Wars films."

    15. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      What about the Star Wars Crhistmas Special? Did that exist or was I just tripping on Pop-Rocks and Yohoo back then?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    16. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      If you're the kind of person who finds it impossible to enjoy any movie if you know how it ends, I would suggest either seeing every movie on opening night or learning to live with disappointment.

      In the case of the Harry Potter books, this doesn't seem to be as important as the media and marketers would have you believe. The books are so well written that many people have reported rereading them several times, getting more out of them each time. This wouldn't be true if the "ending" were all that important.

      Harry seems to be one of those cases where many readers rush through a book the first time, and enjoy the "rush". Then they reread it again at leisure, to pick up the details (and premonitions) that they missed the first time.

      Lots of people are predicting that Harry Potter is destined for "classic" status. For this to happen, knowing the ending can't be too important. The trip must be more important than the destination. After all, everyone knows how Romeo and Juliet ends, right. (For those who don't: They die. As in many of Shakespeare's works. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    17. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by unablepostAC · · Score: 1

      They die????

    18. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      However, many of them will be lucky enough to have someone tell them the right way to watch the movies. (Start with ANH, and go forward until "I am your father", then gosub to TPM, AotC, and RotS to get the story behind Vader, then return and finish the series). It would be a spoiler for these people.

      I have an even better idea:

      Let the first three movies stand on their own, and ignore the crap that came later.

      The most recent movies are utterly forgettable, and add nothing of importance to the Star Wars universe.

      They did however, add a great deal to George Lucas' bank account, which I suspect was their intended function.

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    19. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      They die. As in many of Shakespeare's works.

      You have to take it in context though. Most of Shakespeare's audience was going to die from something awful in the next few years' time anyway. At least Romeo and Juliet died for Love.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    20. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      I was glad when Voldermont's head was crushed under the weight of the Weasley's Ford Anglia.

      But Ginny took forever to land her broomstick outside the diner.

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    21. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

      Is the Vader thing still a spoiler?

      I have one word for you: Rosebud.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    22. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by Piazzola · · Score: 1
      Well written?

      You think Harry Potter books are well-written?! Jesus Christ, that's a sad comment on your literacy level.

      The first book was well-written in a whimsical fashion. The quality has steadily declined from there. Book 6 could have been ripped straight off of fanfiction.net, and this coming one isn't any better. I've read the leak, and spent most of the time praying that it was a hoax simply because I cannot believe that people are going to make so much money off such utter tripe.

    23. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Ginny took forever to land her broomstick outside the diner.

      and said, "This one time... at quiddich camp... I stuck a broomstick in my pussy."

    24. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by lmpeters · · Score: 1

      Is the Vader thing still a spoiler?

      Zurg: Surrender, Buzz Lightyear!
      Buzz: Never! You killed my father!
      Zurg: No! I am your father!
      Buzz: NOOOOO!!!!!!!!

      It's not a spoiler. It's a cliche.

    25. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      and who Norman Bate's mother is

      Who was Norman Bate's mother?

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    26. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by Scooter's_dad · · Score: 1

      Who was Norman Bate's mother?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Bates. Better yet, rent Psycho.

      Incidentally I either omitted an "s" or misplaced the apostrophe, depending on your persuasion.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with Cat 5 cable.
    27. Re:And who saw that ending coming? by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      However, many of them will be lucky enough to have someone tell them the right way to watch the movies. (Start with ANH, and go forward until "I am your father", then gosub to TPM, AotC, and RotS to get the story behind Vader, then return and finish the series). It would be a spoiler for these people. I believe the correct order is "A New Hope", "The Empire Strikes Back" "Return of the Jedi" and forget the prequels.
  5. The main problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    On several sites that allow commenting, people are posting the spoilers. I've already had the book ruined for me unexpectedly :P (since it was a week before release)...

    1. Re:The main problem... by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      On several sites that allow commenting, people are posting the spoilers. I've already had the book ruined for me unexpectedly

      Hell, that sucks. Although I haven't read the books but I'm trying to avoid spoilers. Really, I don't worry that much about explicit ones. Rather I am more concerned about subliminal spoilers. Yeah, the tinfoil hat is at full power.

      Don't worry about it I guess. In the end the result should be the same. Either you'll enjoy the book or you won't. Subliminal messages are what you want to watch out for - they're harder to block.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    2. Re:The main problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very nice. :)

    3. Re:The main problem... by bfields · · Score: 1

      I've already had the book ruined for me unexpectedly

      It won't be ruined. I think it's a bit of a myth that the feeling of suspense really has anything to do with not knowing a few small facts that are revealed at the end. I can't give a definition of suspense, but I know from experience that it's something you feel in pretty much the same way whether or not you've seen some spoilers, and even when you've read a book before.

    4. Re:The main problem... by Ironica · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It won't be ruined. I think it's a bit of a myth that the feeling of suspense really has anything to do with not knowing a few small facts that are revealed at the end. I can't give a definition of suspense, but I know from experience that it's something you feel in pretty much the same way whether or not you've seen some spoilers, and even when you've read a book before.

      Having something "spoiled" is not simply a matter of having the suspense taken away. Yes, you can still enjoy the story if you know how certain things are going to be... but you don't enjoy it *as much* as if you're figuring out things as you go along. Ever watch a movie or read a book a second time? Ever notice things you didn't notice before... certain foreshadowings, links, etc.? It's a different experience when you know what happens than when you don't.

      I accidentally got the books out of order in Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy; read 2/3rds of the way through Blue Mars before I read Green Mars. Then, realizing the mistake, stopped Blue and read Green. It wasn't nearly as much fun, knowing how the war would turn out and who would die and who would get captured and have a personality transplant and whatnot. (It's not nearly as interesting as it sounds; I wish I had those dozens of hours I spent slogging through the series back.) Reading the remainder of Blue Mars was much more diverting (the first 2/3rds was sort of confusing, for obvious reasons).

      In fact, my husband and I have started avoiding trailers for much-anticipated movies, because even that spoils our enjoyment some. There are some movies or books that are better if you "know what to expect," but most of my favorite media experiences have been when I went in cold, knowing nothing about what to expect or what would happen.
      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    5. Re:The main problem... by kayditty · · Score: 0

      HARIRIRIY DIIES? whoops. I forgot that some people (ancients) capitalize letters which aren't at the start of a sentence.

    6. Re:The main problem... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      In fact, my husband and I have started avoiding trailers for much-anticipated movies, because even that spoils our enjoyment some. There are some movies or books that are better if you "know what to expect," but most of my favorite media experiences have been when I went in cold, knowing nothing about what to expect or what would happen.

      Hear, hear.

      The worst example, in cinematic terms, of a film that was spoilt before you saw a single second of it must have been Terminator 2: Judgement Day.

      The idiots at the studio, and Arnold Schwarzenegger himself, just couldn't keep the plot twist regarding his character quiet. If they had done that, then the scene where the his character first encounters John Connor, etc would have been such a different experience.

      Instead of becoming a "WOW!" moment that blew your head off it became a "meh..." one that barely had your interest, because you, your neighbour and everybody in the cinema who didn't live in a cave knew every detail of the twist before they sat down.

      Don't get me wrong, it's a great movie, but it would have been an even better one if they could have just kept that bit to themselves.

      Similarly, it's why it's essential to watch the Star Wars movies in the order of their original cinematic release, ie, episodes IV, V and VI before I, II and III. The Skywalker family revelations in The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi are rendered meaningless moments if you watch them in strict chronological order.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    7. Re:The main problem... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      The worst I've seen was the trailer for Terry Pratchett's Hogfather. Summed up the whole movie, right down to the last dramatic moments.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    8. Re:The main problem... by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, totally agree with that. I had read the book so I knew the story but the adverts did seem to give away a hell of a lot. The little "coming in the next installment" thing they did was pretty bad as well.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    9. Re:The main problem... by Nuskrad · · Score: 1

      Pssh, like that Romeo and Juliet! I was sitting down getting ready to enjoy it, and just as it was starting some guy came on stage and told me they both die at the end! Gutted.

    10. Re:The main problem... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      After watching the whole thing, I wished I'd just stuck to the trailer. I hope whoever cast Teatime never works in TV again.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:The main problem... by Khomar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In fact, my husband and I have started avoiding trailers for much-anticipated movies, because even that spoils our enjoyment some.

      An example of a good trailer was the original Matrix trailer. It showed a little bit of action and the Gothic look and ended with the enigmatic "Unfortunately, I can't tell you what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself." Awesome. I will never forget the first time I saw the film in wonder at the things that Trinity was doing as she fled the cops or the shock of the interrogation scene with the "bug".

      Pixar also usually does it right (at least before the final trailers... then, not so much). Introduce the characters and the basic feel... but what is the movie about? No idea, but I want to see it. Too bad more studios don't learn some lessons here.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    12. Re:The main problem... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Well, look at it this way, all of the "spoilers" you've seen thus far have been just outright fabrications designed to make you mad (aka trolling). Remember how right before the last book came out there were people all over the internet going "Hermione dies!"? Yeah, it's just like that.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    13. Re:The main problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the Harry Potter series is completely dependent on the lack of knowledge of the ending to be enjoyable.

      Remember reading Lord of the Rings? Remember reading it a second time? And a third? And still feeling the same sort of excitement the fourth and fifth times as the first, even knowing full well what happens at the very end?

      I've never reread a Harry Potter book--ever. Even the third book, which I thought was the best and which I thought contained both best story and her best storytelling, I've only picked up again to find scenes that had not been in the movie. It's because what makes Harry Potter is the story, not the storytelling. Our high hopes for book seven is and solely is for the conclusion of the Harry Potter story, not for the next book by J.K. Rowling. Once the story has been satisfied, the storytelling cannot.

      I get discouraged from general reading just imagining myself wading through Order of the Phoenix again. Ugh.

      So yes, spoiling the story will completely and entirely spoil the reading experience. It doesn't mean I won't read it. I'm still curious as to how things became that way. But reading it will seem more like a chore than entertainment.

    14. Re:The main problem... by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      For my money the worst trailer spoiler ever was Tom Hanks, with a big beard, back in civilization, knocking at his wife's door. I think every single commercial trailer spot featured this portion of the movie. Major suckage.

      Like the grandparent, I do not view a trailer of a movie I am planning to watch. I would be hard pressed to find a single trailer that added _anything_ to the watching of a movie.

      --
      I come here for the love
    15. Re:The main problem... by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he was nothing like the way I expected him to be. The accent totally grated on me.

      The film itself was entertaining enough and remarkably true to the book, but I prefer the book. Terry Pratchet is very good at describing characters, and if you have a half-decent imagination the description from the book is going to allow you to create an image of the character that'll be beyond anything a a film-maker could do.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    16. Re:The main problem... by RevWhite · · Score: 1

      Why would you read this story then? You have to know that ACs are going to post them.

      --
      Hey, can I bum a sig?
    17. Re:The main problem... by Valdez · · Score: 1

      Good thing I read /. I was getting ready to plow into Blue Mars... just finished Red. Thanks!

    18. Re:The main problem... by mutterc · · Score: 1

      I got that feeling once, on the first viewing of a movie.

      My wife and I were watching "The Sixth Sense" with some friends.

      Very soon into the movie, my wife successfully (though none of us knew that at the time) guessed and blurted out the Big Twist.

      We all spent the movie looking for little clues that confirmed this (e.g. who talks to Bruce Willis). It was pretty interesting. Had she not inadvertently spoiled the twist, we'd have had to watch the movie a second time to pick up on all those little details.

    19. Re:The main problem... by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      In fact, my husband and I have started avoiding trailers for much-anticipated movies, because even that spoils our enjoyment some.

      To whit, the greatest movie experience of my adolescent life:

      My friend Nancy tells em a new Tarantino movie is out and we should go see it. I have no idea what i is as I am on one of my "no tv, no radio" jags and haven't heard an advertisement for so much as a bar of soap in over 6 months.

      The movie was "From Dusk to Dawn" and you can't imagine how cool it was to all of a sudden have vampires jump out and slaughter everyone halfway through the movie.

      If I had seen the previews the movie would have just been another B movie. Instead it was a total riot.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  6. I'll be waiting for the TC by Frogbert · · Score: 1

    Can someone who has it please tell me if it is suitable for OCR?

    1. Re:I'll be waiting for the TC by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Nope, not at all; which is why I think it's a PR stunt.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I'll be waiting for the TC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a pdf copy exists that was probably made with OCR. it's good quality.

    3. Re:I'll be waiting for the TC by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Can someone who has it please tell me if it is suitable for OCR?
      What would be the point? Just to reduce the file size?
    4. Re:I'll be waiting for the TC by STrinity · · Score: 1

      There are pages that are barely human readable.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    5. Re:I'll be waiting for the TC by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      no

  7. Reading it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol

    Reading it right now. Only a couple pages (like 2% of the book) are unreadable, doesn't affect the plot at all. And don't give me crap about stealing/pirating/hurting sales, since I still plan on being at the midnight opening at bn.

  8. And will this decrease sales? by lecithin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really doubt it. When this stuff happens the media reports it. that is advertising.

    And for you folks that read this and/or the spoilers, too bad. You could have closed your eyes.

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:And will this decrease sales? by _Mustang · · Score: 1

      Hell ya - who f*n cares if it was leaked? No, I don't mean publishers/author and them folks but fans. You see if a fan doesn't want to know the ending then they can NOT LOOK/READ/DOWNLOAD whatever, and wait for the real book to come out and just read it. It's not like being at the movies and hearing the twits in the show before you discussing the killer movie-moment as they walk past you at the theatre..

      Now I've yet to read even a single one of the books, but I have enjoyed the movies and will watch every single one that comes out. Heck I even intend on buying whatever box-set of the books becomes available in the near future. Does it bother me that I'll "know" the story beforehand, NO. know why? The same ability I and most every other movie watcher has/has developed. You know the one which allows me to watch the friken movie version - the whole "suspension of disbelief" thing. I mean really, would you _ever_ be able to reread or even HAVE a favorite book if you couldn't turn that on and off as needed.. ? And if you have that ability in the first place then it really doesn't matter.. man I've lost count of how many times I've read the same book or series of from a variety of authors and I still love it each and every time.

    2. Re:And will this decrease sales? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't make it right. I find it truly astounding that many on Slashdot, indeed it's a rather pervasive groupthink mentality, hate advertisements, yet they argue that by illegally distributing intellectual property they are somehow helping advertise the work for the creator, all for free, they want little in return except the intellectual proerty and all rights to copy, distribute it, etc. Sounds like a bunch of fucking whores to me. You can't have it both ways.

    3. Re:And will this decrease sales? by _Mustang · · Score: 1

      replying to an a/c - cripes but what the hell..
      I'm not sure if you mean the parent or me, but I for one never made any sort of argument concerning "right" or "moral" or any other such thing. The only thing I see here is that the more people buy into the hype the more this kind of crap occurs and it ends up being a vicious circle..

      Best to treat it like gum on your shoe - scrape it off and keep walking.

    4. Re:And will this decrease sales? by muffen · · Score: 1

      And for you folks that read this and/or the spoilers, too bad. You could have closed your eyes.
      People don't read spoilers because they are trying to read them. I half-read one because some moron thought it was a good idea to have it as his signature on a gaming forum I read. I didn't go there expecting to see Harry Potter spoilers. It's not always that easy to avoid them.

      ... then of course there was the incident when the last book was released when someone (stop reading here if you haven't read the last book) drove past a huge line outside a bookstore in a car with a megaphone screaming dumbledore dies.

      Anyways, I don't like this being released but then again, some things I do like being released early (like TV shows since they are shown in the US first) so I'm not going to complain, just wish people would stop posting spoilers without even so much as a little warning.
    5. Re:And will this decrease sales? by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really doubt it. When this stuff happens the media reports it. that is advertising.

      Somehow I doubt that the new Harry Potter book needs much advertising. It's a bit of a paradox because the only reason it's getting attention is because it needs no advertising -- if this were some book that few had heard of, the media wouldn't care that it was leaked.

      And for you folks that read this and/or the spoilers, too bad. You could have closed your eyes.

      Idiotic. The problem with an early release (although it would be awesome if some budding writer wrote some fan fiction pseudo-Harry Potter, after which they'll reveal themselves and enjoy the masses that read their work that wouldn't have otherwise) isn't that fans can't stop themselves, but that sociopath asshats have some innate need to try to spoil things for other people, so I'm sure the trolls are downloading it purely for source material.

      For that reason there needs to be so much noise of false spoilers that it no longer has the impact it once did.

      Harry Potter is seduced to the dark side by Lord Voldemort. To prove his loyalty he is sent to kill Hermione, but just as he's about to strike the mortal blow he pushes back the evil and is freed from Voldemort's grasp.

      (BTW: I don't read Harry Potter, but I appreciate that some people are really into it)
  9. Re:The info you are looking for: by Frogbert · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, thanks for that. I was totally lost when Mr. Slashdot started talking about "bitorrents". Its lucky you dropped in to expand on the totally vague summary, up until this point I had no idea on how to search for this Harold Potter fellow and where I would even go to look for something such as this. Thank you again for gracing us with your wisdom.

  10. Great marketing by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This could be a marketing strategy. Just make sure the readable pages don't expose much of the story and make the unreadable pages contain bits of juicy writing. Just enough to make book worms salivate for more Potter action.

    I should pattent this method of advertising.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Great marketing by lecithin · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      Won't it be funny when we find out that the *WRONG BOOK* was leaked?

      Honeypot???

      --
      It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    2. Re:Great marketing by STrinity · · Score: 1

      There are only about five pages that are wholly unreadable, and only one of them contains anything significant.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    3. Re:Great marketing by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Exactly. More than enough reason not to bother with it and buy the book (if Harry Potter is your thing, that is).
      I mean, what does the book cost? More than ten quid? I doubt it, and if I was interested enough in the story I'd be more than ten quid interested in getting it unfettered.

    4. Re:Great marketing by funkatron · · Score: 1

      I think they said it was £17.99 but I havent checked.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    5. Re:Great marketing by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know, a lot of people were complaining that Harry Potter was not encouraging children to read the right kind of books (seriously. Wikipedia has references). Maybe this is a plot by some of these people, who have scanned in a copy of the complete works of Shakespeare and are seeing how many children they can make read it before they realise it's not really Harry Potter. I figure it will take the average 1337 kiddie a good two plays and a sonnet before they figure it out...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Great marketing by AncientPC · · Score: 1

      I know you're not the one making the argument, but I've never heard it before and would like to respond.

      If pot can be a gateway drug, why can't Harry Potter books be a "gateway book"? You're exposing kids to reading (the old fashioned way) and they're liking it. Given the current culture of short attention spans and Google/Wiki society I think people need to be happy with any small victory.

  11. Uberspoiler at bayimg.com by viking80 · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
    1. Re:Uberspoiler at bayimg.com by numbski · · Score: 1

      Now THAT is funny. :D

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    2. Re:Uberspoiler at bayimg.com by hlomas · · Score: 1

      That image is Snape kills Dumbledore x infinity

    3. Re:Uberspoiler at bayimg.com by GFree · · Score: 1

      The net's acting a little slow here, so until the page loads I'm gonna have to assume that the latest Harry Potter book has "Sexy Photos of Women", which apparently I can browse in my area 100% free. Now this is my kind of book!

    4. Re:Uberspoiler at bayimg.com by The+Barking+Dog · · Score: 1

      Three of them (and the PS) are 100% correct. One is flat out wrong, but on the right track. One in context is a possibility. Don't know about the other three. They left out two pretty big ones (or at least I think they're big). This is from reading the last three chapters and the epilogue.

  12. Sigh... by perlhacker14 · · Score: 1

    What will this gain? The photos have a serial number of the camera, so how long is it until the person is caught? I personally would enjoy the chance to go through and read all of it, but bit torrent downloads can be tracked, and I am not about to risk it or waste my time on bad quality pictures with half of it blurry (I did see the pictures on some one elses machine). There is also a wide policy about posting spoilers, so nearly all will ignore this and move on with their lives. I personally pity the fool who put the pictures up there; I would start running to some far off land for the next year or so to avoid the feds and publishers.

    1. Re:Sigh... by grub · · Score: 1


      The camera info you mention can be altered.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Sigh... by magarity · · Score: 5, Funny

      but bit torrent downloads can be tracked
       
      You mean one of your neighbors isn't running a open WAP, er, I mean 'torrent anonymizer'?

    3. Re:Sigh... by Kilz · · Score: 1

      With the avilability of cheap digital cameras, that can be bought and disposed of. The idea that it will lead to someone being caught is simply bad. You can even buy a disposable and mod it http://webpages.charter.net/tvickers89/PV2mods.htm for $20 then throw it away.http://webpages.charter.net/tvickers89/PV2mod s.htm

      --
      I trust Microsoft as far as I could comfortably spit a dead rat
    4. Re:Sigh... by Tuoqui · · Score: 2, Funny

      The photos have a serial number of the camera

      It'd be hard to prove the serial number if you put the camera through a blender

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    5. Re:Sigh... by compro01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      well, according to the EXIF on the pics, they images in question were shot with a camera like this one, i don't really think it counts as "disposable", except maybe to Gates or someone else with an unreasonable amount of money.

      then again, the EXIF data can be faked if one was so inclined.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    6. Re:Sigh... by XeresRazor · · Score: 1

      Then someone needs to take it away from them and give them a cheap point and shoot. They're some of the worst photos I've ever seen.

    7. Re:Sigh... by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      I also wondered why someone would do that. Legal issues if/when they get caught aside, think about how much time they wasted. At least with the old school bootleggers who sneaked camcorders into movie theaters were then selling their products, so they could claim they were acting out of greed. This guy seems to be just doing it to earn the title "Biggest Dork of the Land".

      The only theory I can think of is that it was posted by an optometrist who is hoping to ruin the vision of thousands of American kids by having them read poorly reproduced copies of text on their computers. One day very soon they will all be sporting their own pairs of Harry Potter glasses.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    8. Re:Sigh... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Um, how exactly do they find the camera once they have the serial number to match it up? Fucking magic?

    9. Re:Sigh... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      He was the first, and as far as I know, the likely source of all spoilers up to this point. Do you realize how many people he can pass by on the street now that know the ending of the book because of his efforts? That's influence.

    10. Re:Sigh... by joeszilagyi · · Score: 1

      Alohomora?

      --
      Dude, where's my packet?
    11. Re:Sigh... by Samah · · Score: 1

      So... open the JPEG, select all, copy, create new image, paste, save.
      Camera serial indeed.

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    12. Re:Sigh... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of Accio actually :)

    13. Re:Sigh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...repeat ~500 times.

    14. Re:Sigh... by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      You need to get out more...

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  13. I saw it. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    I read it until I realized that if I keep reading this, it'll ruin it for me when the book actually does come out.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    1. Re:I saw it. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I read it until I realized that if I keep reading this, it'll ruin it for me when the book actually does come out.

      Yes, much better to have it ruined by reading the book itself rather then have it ruined by reading a scan of the book ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  14. Why? by nebaz · · Score: 1

    This isn't "lone gunman are dead", but the fact that there is a "Harry Potter leaked info" story right now is just the place for trolls, etc, to post spoilers. I'm avoiding all of the Harry Potter forums as is to avoid this -- I'd rather not have to avoid Slashdot.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:Why? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      I hate to say it, but you probably should already. I've seen the spoilers lots of times on here.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  15. Mod parent body off of front page by Eco-Mono · · Score: 1

    By the time I had read the subject line's *spoilers* tag, my peripheral vision had read and processed the the first sentence of the parent. I don't think this needs to be modded into oblivion, but it SHOULD require deliberate action from the user to appear.

    --
    (rot13) rpbzbab@tznvy.pbz
    1. Re:Mod parent body off of front page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you didn't read the whole parent post, but I did and it's obviously a troll making stuff up, so I don't think anything was spoiled for you. :)

  16. I'll wait until the 21st by smeagols_ghost · · Score: 1

    I've waited this long, have the day off work and the fridge stocked with spcied wine.

    I for one will be waiting until the official launch for my copy.

    1. Re:I'll wait until the 21st by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I've waited this long, have the day off work and the fridge stocked with spcied wine."

      ok, you are the biggest dork, you win.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I'll wait until the 21st by ozbird · · Score: 4, Informative

      "I've waited this long, have the day off work and the fridge stocked with spcied wine."

      ok, you are the biggest dork, you win.


      Remember kids, gazpacho soup is served cold; spiced wine is served hot.

    3. Re:I'll wait until the 21st by macemoneta · · Score: 1

      ok, you are the biggest dork, you win.

      Thank goodness, I'm off the hook this once.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    4. Re:I'll wait until the 21st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      crap! i cant even get THAT right! /suicides

    5. Re:I'll wait until the 21st by watzinaneihm · · Score: 1

      But spcied wine is served clod.

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    6. Re:I'll wait until the 21st by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 1

      If only, just once, they'd said, "Gazpacho soup is served cold!" I could've been an admiral by now!

      --
      Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
    7. Re:I'll wait until the 21st by andrewd18 · · Score: 1

      I'd drink wine with spice, but I'd be afraid it would turn my eyes all blue.

    8. Re:I'll wait until the 21st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no he is certainly not.

      If he would have said.

      "I've waited this long, Have the day off, my Rogue outfit is cleaned, and I have the fridge stocked with my best batch of mead from last year."

      That would be the biggest dork.

      Although, I have made mead, it's pretty good and kicks the crap out of most beer if you know how to let it go further to get to 15% before it turns to vinegar.

    9. Re:I'll wait until the 21st by AiToyonsNostril · · Score: 1

      Now only if Rimmer reads Slashdot archives...

      --
      "I'm not good. I'm not nice. I'm just right."
  17. Full Spoilers by kzkq · · Score: 2, Informative

    I already read the whole low quality photo thing (remarkable how well your eyes can read horribly blurred jpg compressed text) and posted a summary here for anyone who is interested: http://harrypotter7spoilers.blogspot.com/ there were really only about 4 pages and a few more paragraphs that were illegible. Put it did take some zooming and effort to get through the whole thing in about 6 hours.

    1. Re:Full Spoilers by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      I thought the mystery was already outed in robot chicken

      http://youtube.com/watch?v=GNcw5uBEnEA

    2. Re:Full Spoilers by Ka+D'Argo · · Score: 1

      If those spoilers are true, that indeed sounds fucking awesome.

      Only downside is, it's a new book. So the paperback edition won't be out for a while, and even most discount stores will want like $25 for the hardcover. Libraries will have it for a free checkout but the local libraries here have a 7-day checkout time for "new releases" whereas other books can be checked out for just over 3 weeks.

      --
      Aw Frell this
    3. Re:Full Spoilers by LordEd · · Score: 1

      Our local library system currently has about 110 copies listed "on order". There are 431 hold requests pending. Even assuming a turnaround time of 1 week, that would be a minimum of 4 weeks wait before getting the next available book.

  18. Encourages sales more likely by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    People dedicated enough to read the out of focus pictures will still buy a properly printed book too.

    The same really applies to those movie rip-offs shot with a video cam from the back row. Anybody buying a fuzzy/shaky rip-off will still buy a legal version later.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Encourages sales more likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an excellent argument regarding pirated movies. Backed up with nothing, and totally unrelated to the topic, but I'm sure here on Slashdot it's taken as a matter of faith anyway.

  19. Re:The info you are looking for: by perlhacker14 · · Score: 1

    You do realize that over half are fakes? Look at the copyright name and copyright page and tell.

  20. Just Fraking Great by rlp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was planning on picking up the book on Saturday morning and I was going to avoid the Web, TV, and radio till I finished. Now I've got to start the self-imposed media blackout now.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Just Fraking Great by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Read it: Harry dies.

      HA! Just testing if you actually put your self in a black out.

      I haven't rad it..or have I?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Just Fraking Great by glwtta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, well, going to slashdot to read about the leak is a great way to start that blackout.

      BTW, the Lone Gunmen are dead.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:Just Fraking Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read it: Harry dies.

      -- and comes back to life after having a post-mortem chat with Dumbledore in King's Cross Station.

      Don't believe me? Come back in a week and be embarrassed ...

  21. How do we know? by SEWilco · · Score: 5, Funny

    How do we know it was done with a handheld camera? Looks like magic to me.

  22. who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Its a freaking KIDS BOOK!

    1. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the first book when I was a kid, kind of, now a lot of years have gone by.

    2. Re:Who cares? by danzona · · Score: 1

      The point isn't so much that the book is available in a free format, the point is that this is supposed to be the final book of the series so everybody expects some kind of sad or in other way surprising ending.

      The larger concern seems to be that people will read the ending before the book is officially released and then blab about it, effectively "ruining" the book (as if something as badly written as these books are could be ruined) for all the kids who marathon read the book in the first 24 hours.

    3. Re:who cares? by Cstryon · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it's been about 17 years. -And I wouldn't say that 4-7 are kids books. 1-3 are for sure, but Rowling really made the story age with the readers.

      --
      Indoctrinate : to instruct especially in fundamentals or rudiments Educate : to develop mentally, morally, or aestheti
    4. Re:Who cares? by Umuri · · Score: 1

      Actually you are way off target.

      This does 3 important things:

      1. it gives all the trolls of the internet, and real life, confirmed spoilers. and not just the xxxx dies or yyyy maries zzzz, but spoilers that involved actually plot twists. Most spoilers to this point were way off or were easy to see, and didn't break plot twists. After this was released, the spoilers got a lot worse and revolved around plot points.

      2. This allows people who want to browse any part of the internet before the book comes out, a chance to read the book and NOT have it ruined for them.

      3. The low-quality camera pictures, which originated from luelinks, then quickly migrated to 4chan and from there were spread via rapidshare to the rest of the internet, are so horrid that negative color is the best way to read them, which isn't very hard w/o zooming, but is near impossible for any commercial or noncommercial OCR package without doing every page almost completely manually.

      Disclaimer as a fan: I am buying the book on friday, 3 copies, 1 for family, 1 for family library, 1 to read.
      Disclaimer as a techie: I speak from experience as i've seen the camera captures, i watched the spread on 4chan and onto the torrent sites, and there was an entire thread devoted to people OCRing the pages, which i contributed to.
      Most commerical and university packages were used, as well as the open source OCR engine, which wasn't that horrid.

      --
      You never realize how much manually made unmanaged "linked" lists suck, till you have src.link.link.link.link...
    5. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it really doesn't suck that bad, I find it perfectly readable except for a few pages, although ocrs would have trouble. A distributed effort at typing it out has already released the first 10 chapters onto pirate bay, by morning it'll be the whole book.

    6. Re:Who cares? by Source+Quench · · Score: 1

      This is like a .MOD file vs. an .MP3 -- the latter is sometimes a suitable replacement for the medium it came from, but the former is not. It may get the point across, but it's just not the same thing.
      Sorry to be a pedant, but what's the equivalent to FLAC? :)
    7. Re:Who cares? by abb3w · · Score: 1

      The fans won't want to read this low-quality capture

      The normal fans, perhaps. The equivalent of the sports "fans" who will root for their home baseball team on TV when they catch it. You're not considering the rabid "otaku/trekkie" grade fanatics, equivalent to those who go to Chicago Cubs away away games, shirtless in 40 degree rain storms, with their torsos painted with a team logo.

      Such Otaku will, of course, be ready to transcribe it so that others won't have to strain their eyes. Which I fully intend to take advantage of, as soon as "lay motionless and pathetic as a toy" starts turning up search results. Patience is a virtue; as such, I will have nothing to do with it.

      On the other hand, I don't think this will notably affect sales, even after the Otaku Character Recognition (TM) text file version gets out. I believe those who would read the on-line copy mostly fall into to groups: utterly impatient fans, who are rabid enough that they'll buy a copy anyway; and those so cheap they'd read it in the bookstore, or borrow it from a friend or library, rather than buy it.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    8. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've been OCRed already check ISOHunt...

      I have a pdf and I'm loading this sucker up for my mother, she can move over to the hard copy when my sister finishes it... Rowling has enough millions without my family buying 2-3 copies :)

    9. Re:Who cares? by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      > Sorry to be a pedant, but what's the equivalent to FLAC? :)

      That would be whatever data file(s) was/were used to print the book itself. With that, and the appropriate press and software, you could run perfect copies.

      It looks like human OCR (a distributed typing effort) has bridged the gap though. Still, this did slow down the massive leakage slightly. I think it's time to turn lemons into lemonade and let the stores put it on the shelf unannounced, starting now. Those who really want it will tell each other where to find it -- at least until it's on display in every bookstore, which should take no more than 24 hours. Beat the party poopers to the punch and let stores sell whatever they already have on hand.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  23. More on Bayimg by viking80 · · Score: 1
    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
    1. Re:More on Bayimg by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      BAYIMG - free uncensored image hosting (Talk about false advertising)

      NO COPYRIGHT. NO LICENSE.

  24. The hands. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have slept with J.K. Rowling, and I can state, with absolute certainty, that those are her hands. They are absolutely unmistakable, so the woman has leaked her own book. Way to drum up interest!

    1. Re:The hands. by WhiteRider · · Score: 0

      You don't see how contradictory your statement is?

      You're posting on Slashdot and you slept with a woman??? I think not!!!

    2. Re:The hands. by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I got together with some of my friends and our own research determined that the hands belong to somebody by the name of "Neal, Cowboy".

  25. Unexpectedly ruined? by lecithin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, somebody MADE you read the spoilers?

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:Unexpectedly ruined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So, somebody MADE you read the spoilers?

      When trolls post it in the middle of a batch of comments with a deceptive title? I didn't exactly seek out spoilers. It wasn't a Harry Potter related post even.

    2. Re:Unexpectedly ruined? by scott_karana · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You don't know they're spoilers until you read them, hence "unexpected".
      Christ. Pedants.

  26. Nerdy Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    $ jhead -v *.jpg
    Exif header 10750 bytes long
    Exif section in Intel order
    (dir has 9 entries)
            Make = "Canon"
            Model = "Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL"
            Orientation = 1
            XResolution = 180/1
            YResolution = 180/1
            ResolutionUnit = 2
            DateTime = "2007:07:15 20:40:11" ...
                            Canon maker tag 0006 Value = "IMG:EOS DIGITAL REBEL JPEG"
                            Canon maker tag 0007 Value = "Firmware Version 1.0.2"
                            Canon maker tag 000c Value = 560151117
                            Canon maker tag 0015 Value = -1879048192
                            Canon maker tag 0008 Value = 1363625 ...

    Yeah, the guy might as well have left his drivers license on his ugly ass speckled carpet.

  27. HERE IT IS, OCD'D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Harry and Ron stepped through the fat woman painting into the Gryffindor common room in some consternation. "I hope Hermione hasn't passed us completely," Ron said. "I can't believe she took summer classes."
    "I would have if I could," Harry said, "but I didn't have the O.W.L.s to manage it. Remember, her last letter said she was going to go on to post-graduate work." They waved to familiar friends and began introducing themselves to the new students. Quite a lot of the younger students kept passing them and then looking back at Harry and stopping dead in surprise.
    After eight years, Harry was used to being stared at. The dark Lord Voldemort's attack on him as a baby left him a distinctive lightning bolt-shaped scar on his forehead, and the reputation of being the only person Voldemort couldn't kill outright did the rest, with some help from the reputation Harry had built for himself since. After discovering he was a wizard and could attend Hogwart's School of Wizardry, Harry had gotten wind of several of Voldemort's evil schemes and had thwarted them all. He had faced death, humiliation, basilisks, dragons, evil wizards, malicious spells, foul odors, the undead, and even the Inland Revenue and remained unscathed. Oddly enough, Voldemort's schemes seemed to be losing oomph, as if he could no longer pull together enough power to get a really good evil plan together. The last attempt had been to place Harry on a chain letter mailing list.
    As more and more students kept staring at him, Harry began to realize that there was a different class of attention. He recognized the star-gazers, the well-wishers, the groupies, the jealous, and the envious, but he kept noticing female students looking at him in a funny way, almost as if they were hungry. One pretty blonde student even went so far as to lick her lips and use her hand to smooth out the front of her robe, although Harry hadn't noticed any wrinkles..
    Ron noticed it as well. "Cor, Harry! You outta be able to get some serious schtank this year! And we're finally of legal age to learn Sex Magic, so you'll have an excuse and everything."
    "But why are they staring at me? Why not both of us?" Harry asked, blushing furiously.
    "Well, look at you. You've been playing tournament-class Quidditch for eight years, you're in fantastic shape, you've got the scar (chicks love scars, Harry), and Daniel Radcliffe turned out to be a hunk."
    "What?"
    "Look, there's Hermione!"
    Hermione Granger was standing at the bottom of the steps to the girls' dormitories. Harry and Ron dashed towards her and then stopped dead. Hermione had changed over the summer. The difference was so great that Harry was forced to realize that he hadn't really been paying attention the last few years. The mass of curly brown hair was still there, but it was arranged in an artful way to frame her face and curl over her shoulders. Her face was more angular, with high cheekbones and clear milky skin. The prominent front teeth were still there, but they only served to push her lips forward in a very interesting manner, making her look as if she was always just about to eat a strawberry. Her robes had changed as well; they fit quite a bit better, for one, and the neckline seemed much more fascinating than before. She had a thin leather belt around her waist, from which hung several small silk pouches and which incidentally accentuated her lush curves. Heavily orchestrated music began playing. "Hi Harry, hi Ron!" she called, and went to hug them both.
    "Um, cough, wow, Hermione, you're looking really, um, good," Ron blurted out. Harry just nodded and concentrated on trying to breathe normally.
    She preened. "Th

    1. Re:HERE IT IS, OCD'D by Broken+scope · · Score: 2, Funny

      Man the quality of erotica fan fiction has fallen over time.

      --
      You mad
    2. Re:HERE IT IS, OCD'D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      My haxx0r skillz have unearthed the real final lines! Behold:

      "...suddenly Harry woke up.
      'My goodness!' he exclaimed, 'It was all a dream! Mere fantasy parading around as insightful artwork.'
      He sat up in bed and flicked on the TV.
      'Oooh, the Hollyoaks omnibus!' he chuckled. 'I wonder what that blonde student bird is wearing today?' Finally, he thrust a groping hand under the duvet...

      THE END"

    3. Re:HERE IT IS, OCD'D by castrox · · Score: 1

      I declare this the Masterpiece of the Year. Thank you. :-)

      --
      Fight for your digital freedom, join the EFF *now*: http://www.eff.org/support/
    4. Re:HERE IT IS, OCD'D by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Man the quality of erotica fan fiction has fallen over time. Just be glad it's not Harry/Draco. That shit's giving Kirk/Spock a run for the money. If only Sam would kill them.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    5. Re:HERE IT IS, OCD'D by bellers · · Score: 4, Funny

      Aight, I put on my robe and wizard hat.

      --
      This space for rent.
    6. Re:HERE IT IS, OCD'D by Phu5ion · · Score: 1

      OCD == Optical Character Disorder?

      --
      Slashdot is kind of like Playboy; we aren't here to read the articles.
    7. Re:HERE IT IS, OCD'D by nightcats · · Score: 1

      This unfortunate writer has been bitten by a nargle. Horklump blood is the only antidote. Or you can try this.

      --
      Development is programmable; Discovery is not programmable. (Fuller)
    8. Re:HERE IT IS, OCD'D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, need more slashies

    9. Re:HERE IT IS, OCD'D by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Clearly this is an excerpt from the new erotic novel Harry Potter and the Half Black Chick.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    10. Re:HERE IT IS, OCD'D by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Both teens looked down and nodded. "Yes, " said Harry glumly. "We had to go to a different section of Dragon's Alley for it, some shop called Lord Chumley's Marital Accoutrements and Novelties for the Gentleman.

      You didn't OCR that - you dictated it to your secretary!

      Everybody knows Chumley is spelled Cholmondeley (except your secretary ;-)

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
  28. I went looking for spoilers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I lost interest in Harry Potter after about the second book. The only thing that I was curious about was whether HP gets killed off. I'm sure not willing to plow through 759 pages to find that out. From that perspective, spoilers are a good thing.

    It's not like I don't read; it's just that I prefer just about anything by Terry Pratchett to anything by JKR. They both have wizards but Pratchett's are way more entertaining because Pratchett is about three times as clever as JKR.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Pratchett

  29. Efficiency is a bitch by Eco-Mono · · Score: 1, Funny

    People don't seem to realize that the human eye precaches their posts while the brain is still processing the subject line. Mod down, please.

    --
    (rot13) rpbzbab@tznvy.pbz
  30. Re:The spoilers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    rules 1 and 2, faggot

  31. You must be new here. by Eco-Mono · · Score: 1

    Sorry, your response must be in the form of a press release.

    --
    (rot13) rpbzbab@tznvy.pbz
  32. youtube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some prat has put it all who dies etc etc on videos on youtube

    and why was it released in the us before uk when it is a british book?

  33. Who in their right mind by jrutley · · Score: 1

    ... has enough time and energy to photocopy a book page by page?

    1. Re:Who in their right mind by springbox · · Score: 1

      It would have been easier if they used an actual photocopier instead of having to frame each shot with a camera

    2. Re:Who in their right mind by DTemp · · Score: 1

      photographing a book takes less time than reading one.

  34. The ending was leaked! Hermione dies! by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    Just kidding. Made you look! ;)

  35. It's been leaked a lot easier than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My copy showed up on the doorstep today. Online vendor, I won't say which one, but a medium-big name that you'd recognize. Pretty funny, I got the free "slow" shipping option. "Slow" turned out to be nearly a week before the release date...

    1. Re:It's been leaked a lot easier than that. by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Post which vendor, oh mighty precognitive Anonymous Coward.

    2. Re:It's been leaked a lot easier than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Amazon most likely.
      Its happened to me to with other books.
      They tend to get them in a few days early, so amazon send them out while estimating how long it takes to get there so it hopfully turns up on the day of release.

      Sometimes the mail system works better then estimated :)

    3. Re:It's been leaked a lot easier than that. by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Definitely not Amazon. I preordered mine from Amazon and it hasn't even shipped yet.

      That reminds me. I should check why.

    4. Re:It's been leaked a lot easier than that. by GSwarthout · · Score: 1

      It was DeepDiscount.com, same as the camera image leaker.

      --
      It is the 21st century and the time for Klax has passed.
  36. Troll? Pretty damn funny to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "She preened. "Thanks! I've been studying up on Sex Magic, it's dead easy. Did you get all the stuff on your list for this year?""

  37. Sad comment on society by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really do find it sad and pathetic that some people live to spoil things for others. I couldn't care less about Harry Potter but many people do. It's in the same category with defacing artwork to feel a sense of self importance. If they have no talent themselves they feel it gives their lives meaning to destroy some one elses work. Obviously it's not on the same level but it is the same kind of mentality of people that do things like shoot John Lennon. No one knew who the guy was before or cared but now they know his name. Great the guy managed to leak Harry Potter so for a moment he's important. That isn't gaining geek points they are looser points in my book.

    1. Re:Sad comment on society by sohare · · Score: 1, Troll

      I think you have a misconstrued view of people who spoil plots, deface art, etc. Most the time the people have little emotional investment in what they are defacing, and do it primarily for entertainment value rather than any deep reasons. Think about drunk frat boys. The guy who shot Lennon was a friggin sociopath.

      Sure, defacers are douchebags, and vandals need a good punch to the back of the head, but the people with the real problem are those who get overly worked up about art in the first place.

    2. Re:Sad comment on society by freeweed · · Score: 1

      That isn't gaining geek points they are looser points in my book.

      Well, he DID technically loose the book...

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    3. Re:Sad comment on society by Bossk-Office · · Score: 0
      • The guy who posted the photos didn't do it to "spoil" anything for anyone. He provided thousands of people with a copy of what they most dearly wanted days earlier than they could have otherwise got it. Spoiling, my ass!
      • The guy is (for obvious reasons) completely anonymous, he's not exactly gaining fame. To argue "now everyone knows his name" ... are you a troll?
      • Shooting Lennon killed a person; defacing artwork, well, it destroys artwork. But here, nothing has been destroyed. I bet almost to a person, everyone who downloaded this will also buy the book.


    4. Re:Sad comment on society by Drachemorder · · Score: 1

      The guy who took the pictures isn't spoiling it, he's leaking it. He's making the whole thing available for people to read a couple days early. I hate the idea of artificially enforced release dates, so I really have no problem with the leak. You can't just walk into the store and buy the book yet even though they almost certainly have copies tucked away in the storeroom, so I think it's quite justifiable to read a leaked copy if you want. Now, the people spamming spoiler tidbits everywhere, those are the ones spoiling it, and those are the ones you're quite welcome to get mad at.

  38. Folks Just Don't Want an Old Yeller Ending by gadlaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, folks are wanting to see or read the ending before they invest the time and energy into something when they might not like the ending. I don't watch 24, they always kill the folks I like. I found out how the Transformers movie went before going - didn't much like the cartoon movie where Optimus dies so I didn't particularly want to see that either. There are enough surprises out there and nobody wants to pay for a bad surprise so you know, the folks will noodle the facts out as soon as possible.

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
    1. Re:Folks Just Don't Want an Old Yeller Ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Optimus Prime doesn't die in Transformers. The yellow one almost does, but the Wesley Crusher kid tells the feds to let him go. The kid that looks like Wesley Crusher does because one of the Decepticons kills him. I would go see it.

    2. Re:Folks Just Don't Want an Old Yeller Ending by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

      he's talking about the cartoon movie, where optimus prime dies almost right away (needed to make room for new toys).

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    3. Re:Folks Just Don't Want an Old Yeller Ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wesley Crusher kid? That's the kid from Even Stevens (closet Christy Romano fan, yes I've left it on there a few times while browsing through)

    4. Re:Folks Just Don't Want an Old Yeller Ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf?? Optimus dies??? OMG... now you ruined it for me too...

  39. I will never understand... by rhiafaery · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...what possible perverse pleasure anyone could get out of spoiling something wonderful for other people. I sometimes go looking for spoilers, but for something I am really, really looking forward to, I won't do it. I LIKE to anticipate, be surprised, feel the "magic," however you wish to put it. I know, so don't look, but I just can't help feeling sorry for people who walk through life with all the wonder ripped out, and feel that everyone else deserves to have theirs ripped out, as well. Whatever anyone thinks of Harry Potter, anything that encourages reading, imagination, excitement, and wonder is something worth preserving intact.

    I have a Sorting Hat replica I won from hollywood.com years ago, and yes, I will be wearing it to the midnight Harry Potter party, looking ridiculous, embarrassing my kids, and loving every minute of it. LoL. Enjoy life, you only go around once.

    --
    "I am treated as evil by those who feel persecuted because they are not allowed to force me to believe as they do."
    1. Re:I will never understand... by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      I'm curious. What exactly has been spoiled for you?

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    2. Re:I will never understand... by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Oh jesus, what a bunch of sentimental crap.
      Snape dies. "Wonderful"... "Feel the magic"... Too much Disney for you lady!

    3. Re:I will never understand... by rhiafaery · · Score: 1

      Nothing has been spoiled for me. I don't believe I intimated that anything had. In fact, I can't wait. I was merely expressing some frustration with certain people feeling the NEED to spoil anything, in any way, for someone else. As I said, I have no desire to see any spoilers for Harry Potter, although during the first season of Heroes I read every spoiler I could possible root out. Different experiences, I suppose.

      --
      "I am treated as evil by those who feel persecuted because they are not allowed to force me to believe as they do."
    4. Re:I will never understand... by rhiafaery · · Score: 1

      Why thank you. :) As a matter of fact, I love most things Disney. Since my sons have long since moved into the world of making fart sounds with their mouths and knitting their brows over schoolwork, I find it satisfying that they can still have a moment of excitement before seeing Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, or getting ready to go to the midnight party and read the last book. However, I wasn't ONLY referring to Harry Potter when I was talking about wonder. I was talking about ANY experience in life that brings a sense of excitement or anticipation or yes, magic and wonder (no matter HOW it may make anyone else feel, everyone feels different things for different events, and there's nothing at all wrong with that). There are enough grim things to deal with in life. A little mystery and enchantment can't possibly be a bad thing, no matter where they come from.

      --
      "I am treated as evil by those who feel persecuted because they are not allowed to force me to believe as they do."
    5. Re:I will never understand... by nagora · · Score: 1
      As a matter of fact, I love most things Disney.

      There's no hope for you, then. Although I do agree that anyone who would go to this much bother to ruin something for other people really is a pathetic cunt.

      HP1 was dreadful and so I never bothered with the rest of the series but I wouldn't do something as low as this.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    6. Re:I will never understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...what possible perverse pleasure anyone could get out of spoiling something wonderful for other people.

      "I had a rotten childhood. Why shouldn't everyone else?"

    7. Re:I will never understand... by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      ...what possible perverse pleasure anyone could get out of spoiling something wonderful for other people.


      Maybe it's not the perverse pleasure of spoiling anything for the fans

      Maybe it is the joy of screwing with the carefully laid marketing plans of some big corporate monolith and their hype machine?
      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    8. Re:I will never understand... by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      Nothing has been spoiled for me. I don't believe I intimated that anything had. In fact, I can't wait. I was merely expressing some frustration with certain people feeling the NEED to spoil anything, in any way, for someone else.
      I guess I don't understand how your comment is on-topic then. No one is spoiling anything for anyone here. No one is forcing anyone to read the book early.
      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    9. Re:I will never understand... by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griefer

      Always remember that people like this exist everywhere, not just in MMORPGs.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
  40. An advantage of approaching senility... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that I can satisfy my curiosity about the ending now, but will have forgotten all about it by the time I start reading the actual book. Who is this Harry Potter anyway?

  41. ** SPOILER ALERT ** by coren2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Harry is gay.... ... and proud.

    1. Re:** SPOILER ALERT ** by Trogre · · Score: 4, Funny

      Good for him. It's important for one to be happy in life, and sometimes care-free.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:** SPOILER ALERT ** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voldemort is Dick Cheney

    3. Re:** SPOILER ALERT ** by vininim · · Score: 1

      No true, he marries Hermione and have 3 kids.

    4. Re:** SPOILER ALERT ** by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the fanfics already figured that one out

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    5. Re:** SPOILER ALERT ** by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      A gay wizard? That book signing in Kansas is going to be colourful.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    6. Re:** SPOILER ALERT ** by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Harry is gay.... ... and proud. Not much of a spoiler.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    7. Re:** SPOILER ALERT ** by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Harry is gay.... ... and proud.

      So he finally comes clean about his "attraction" to Ginny Weasley being merely a misdirection of his feelings for his best mate Ron?

      I've known this since Harry chose Ron as his "most important person" during the lake trial of the Triwizard Tournament.

  42. Damnit by ShagratTheTitleless · · Score: 1

    No internet for four days!?!

    --
    Sometimes at night I imagine the darkness is filled with horrible things with too many teeth, like Julia Roberts.
  43. Are you a complete cheapskate? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Are you a complete cheapskate?

    What's wrong with waiting a whole four days and then buying the book yourself?

    Or, waiting a few days longer and borrowing a used copy from a friend?

    Or, waiting a few days longer and buying a used copy via eBay?

    Or, borrowing a copy from your local library when they have it?

    If you're that desperate to read the book that you'd go through the hassle of downloading a torrent and then running all the pages through an OCR package, and then putting all that together, and then having to wonder what happened in the parts that weren't clear enough to OCR as well as deal with the hassle of incorrectly recognised characters then you should be a man and just buy for the damn book.

    I'd really love to know your justification for doing anything but that.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Are you a complete cheapskate? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's about styyyyyyle.

    2. Re:Are you a complete cheapskate? by muuh-gnu · · Score: 5, Funny

      > What's wrong with waiting a whole four days and then buying the book yourself?

      The buying.

      > Or, waiting a few days longer and borrowing a used copy from a friend?

      The waiting.

      > Or, waiting a few days longer and buying a used copy via eBay?

      The buying.

      > Or, borrowing a copy from your local library when they have it?

      The waiting.

    3. Re:Are you a complete cheapskate? by Fepple · · Score: 1

      I think this is obvious... so they can say "I've read the book and its not out yet, check out my leet skills" Or... "did you know that..."

    4. Re:Are you a complete cheapskate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is Tom Petty was right when he said "the waiting is the hardest part"?

  44. Talking Book! by sciop101 · · Score: 1
    He should have read the book aloud and uploaded it.

    Would have been faster and improved quality.

    --
    The only thing new in this world is the history that you don't know.[Harry Truman]
    1. Re:Talking Book! by TenBrothers · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a smaller file.

  45. Harry is the Seventh Horcrux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hence the lightning bolt on the forehead.

  46. Serial numbers intact! by jdberry · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hear the perp left his Canon's serial number in the Exif data for each picture. I wonder if he registered the camera? Will Canon protect his privacy? ;)

    1. Re:Serial numbers intact! by jdberry · · Score: 1

      Too bad that google images doesn't yet search by Exif fields.

    2. Re:Serial numbers intact! by MikShapi · · Score: 1

      I'm betting Rowling has already hired several datacenters to spider google images, with professional hitmen standing by in case other identifying images were made by this guy.

      Assuming, of course, she hasn't simply bought google and/or canon for this purpose.

      --
      -
    3. Re:Serial numbers intact! by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

      The first thing I did after downloading one of the photos was look at the exif info - yep the serial Nr is there.
      I would think all they need to do is get a court order for the registration record. The camera was a digital Rebel, not a cheap P&S, so I would bet he registered it.

    4. Re:Serial numbers intact! by pclminion · · Score: 1

      What could that possibly prove?

      "I owned that camera a few years ago. Then I lost it. I suppose somebody found it and used it to do this."

  47. So now PirateBay can be sued... by Via_Patrino · · Score: 1

    FTA: available via bittorrent

    Swedish law protects online "caching" of several copyrighted material, the exception to the rule is literacy.

    That means PirateBay, which owns bayimg and the bittorrent servers controlling the distribution network of that online book now can be sued.

    1. Re:So now PirateBay can be sued... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to hide literacy?

    2. Re:So now PirateBay can be sued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want to hide literacy?

      To be elected President?

    3. Re:So now PirateBay can be sued... by Via_Patrino · · Score: 1

      I mistaken the words, it's literary.
      I will copy as is to avoid mistakes.


      Article 11 a. Temporary forms of copies of works may be made, if the making of the copies is an integral and essential part of a technological process and if the copies are transient or have only a secondary importance in that process. The copies must not have any independent economic importance.

      The making of copies under the first Paragraph is permissible only if the sole purpose of that making is to enable
      1. a transmission in a network between third parties by an intermediary, or
      2. a lawful use, that is, a use that occurs with the consent of the author or his successor in title or another use that is not unpermissible under this Act.

      The provisions under the first and second Paragraphs do not confer a right to make copies of literary works in the form of computer programs or compilations.

    4. Re:So now PirateBay can be sued... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was just making a lame joke.

      Anyway, TBP does not host, transmit, or serve as an intermediary for any content. Technically they just link to it, so the above law would seem inapplicable.

      The part you emphasized merely says this is not a license to make copies freely. Further the phrase, "in the form of computer programs or compilations" modifies "literary works," meaning they are considering them to be literary works.

      If you're solely referencing the English version of the law, I think you may be losing something in the translation -- although it's possible that whomever did the Swedish->English translation mistranslated.

    5. Re:So now PirateBay can be sued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This laws just explicitly permits stuff like copying the contents of a file into memory so that it can be displayed, it has nothing to do with the pirate bay's activities, which involve telling people where they can find (mostly illegal) copies of various media products. This is not in itself illegal, though the users may be breaking laws by using the torrents PB provides.

    6. Re:So now PirateBay can be sued... by ricree · · Score: 1

      Anyway, TBP does not host, transmit, or serve as an intermediary for any content. Technically they just link to it, so the above law would seem inapplicable.
      The material in question was on bayimg, which does actually host the content.
    7. Re:So now PirateBay can be sued... by Via_Patrino · · Score: 1

      PirateBay legal protection, by themselves, is based on that law. So they agree it fits their case and will need to find another argument for that book (literary works).

      PirateBay also own the tracker servers that control the distribution network exclusive for that book (every distribution network is configured by a torrent). This is much more than linking. Of course that's just my opinion and I don't want to argue for decades with people insisting it's "just linking".

  48. Anyone who is a fan enough to..... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ...go through the trouble to deal with such a photo leak has got to need psychiatric help.

    I mean come on... Haven't pirates found out about OCR scanning and text certainly compresses better than images.

    But then again, a genuine fan would want something that fits collector status in at least a minimal way. Like buy the book and hope to get it autographed.

    Pirated works are not collectible except to a pirate maybe, and then its not even for the work as much as it is for the act of piracy.

    Of course there are those who might like to be one up on a friend or two, by knowing what happens before their friends do..

    The price of fame.

    1. Re:Anyone who is a fan enough to..... by ultranova · · Score: 2

      But then again, a genuine fan would want something that fits collector status in at least a minimal way.

      Why ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:Anyone who is a fan enough to..... by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      But then again, a genuine fan would want something that fits collector status in at least a minimal way.

      Why ?

      Because genuine fans are dumb.

  49. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell are you reading this story!?

    Let me guess, you don't expect to be told spoilers here?

    P.S. "Luke! I am your father!"

  50. Who cares? by Mal-2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The fans won't want to read this low-quality capture, the non-fans weren't buying anyway (except as a gift, which they'll still do), and besides, reading the book has never hurt the movie that follows from it. Having a crap copy is either going to do (1) nothing, as it's not worth the effort, or (2)make someone want the book.

    Now if someone OCR'd it to a text file, THAT might actually cut into sales a little bit. But in order to do that, the capture would have to not suck.

    This is like a .MOD file vs. an .MP3 -- the latter is sometimes a suitable replacement for the medium it came from, but the former is not. It may get the point across, but it's just not the same thing.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  51. Disrupt peace in the Middle East?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. Those are strong effects indeed.

    The reach back in time a few thousand years!

    1. Re:Disrupt peace in the Middle East?!?!?! by Valdrax · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, and since when -- in the whole of history -- would taking out the British from the equation have had a negative effect on the Middle East. Practically the whole Muslim world owes Britain a black eye for the effects the British empire has had on history there.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  52. In other Harry Potter news... by toby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An Insightful Guardian columnist has finally come out and said what literate people have known all along. J.K. Rowling's writing is RUBBISH.

    ... I don't think I'm going out on a limb here. Of course, if she has turned into a first-class writer with her forthcoming Potter book, I will happily, no, joyously, eat my words.

    But until then, we have to swallow hers. ...

    ... Do I need to explain why that is such second-rate writing?

    If I do, then that means you're one of the many adults who don't have a problem with the retreat into infantilism that your willing immersion in the Potter books represents. It doesn't make you a bad or silly person. But if you have the patience to read it without noticing how plodding it is, then you are self-evidently someone on whom the possibilities of the English language are largely lost.

    This is the kind of prose that reasonably intelligent nine-year-olds consider pretty hot stuff, if they're producing it themselves; for a highly-educated woman like Rowling to knock out the same kind of material is, shall we say, somewhat disappointing.

    (If you find that revelation shocking, just don't ask about Dan Brown, ok?)

    Predictably, a chorus of twit commenters felt driven to argue that the Potter Phenomenon's sheer Scale and Success makes it self-evidently Valuable to Society (much like B. Gates must be an Important and Clever Person because he's Really Rich.) Uh-uh. Crappy writing is not good for anyone, just like crappy food (this may also come as a surprise to some), and on this point I agree wholeheartedly with Mr Lezard:

    Children exposed to this kind of writing aren't learning anything new about words, or being stretched in any way; as Harold Bloom said, they're not going to be inspired to go off and read the Alice books, or any other enduring classic.

    All the Potter franchise does, like 99% of TV and Hollywood output, is entrench the hold of pointless and mediocre culture. The only thing unusual this time, is it's Made in Britain.

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:In other Harry Potter news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


      Since there are no objective measures for determining the quality of writing, how does one prove that Harry Potter is rubbish? You can't, it is all a matter of opinion.
      People quest for distinction and one to acquire distinction is to be person who mocks what is popular. That is what the Guardian writer and his fellow travelers are doing. The same happened when Dali went through a popular spell and it would occur Dostoevsky became all the rage.
      Personally, I find Harry Potter boring, but I feel that way about most fiction. It is merely a matter of personal taste.

    2. Re:In other Harry Potter news... by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      I may not agree with your point but I find it heartening that you werent modded to a crisp given the high probability of a large harry potter fan moderator demographic and the tendancy for people to mod their opinions not objectively.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    3. Re:In other Harry Potter news... by TenBrothers · · Score: 1
      So the only conclusion to make is that the only items that pass in front of your eyes and ears are items of truly monumental Capital-A Art.

      ....and yet here you are reading
      A) Slashdot, and presumably, based on your liberal quoting
      B) The Guardian

      Or you could state that you made no actual claims yourself, that you were just parroting an article you read somewhere else. In any case, you've made no claims on your own, no meaningful analysis of your own to back up your opinion. That's the mark of a true critic. Using someone else's opinions to stand in place of your own.
    4. Re:In other Harry Potter news... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Shoo. Go read an Elfriede Jelinek play or something.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    5. Re:In other Harry Potter news... by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are two kinds of fiction readers.

      1) people who enjoy tales of all sorts, and just have a good time escaping into an engaging story.

      2) people who read books so that they can either be seen reading them, or can wave the experience about as some sort of intellectualist validation.

      Reading - and the pleasure therefrom - is an intensely personal experience. While I can even agree with the critic's comments regarding Ms. Rowling's predictable, repetitive plotting, farcically two-dimensional characters, and generally unchallenging language, I take great exception to his second-level conclusion: that any respectably intelligent person must not enjoy the book. I agree, JK Rowlings' writing IS rubbish; that doesn't mean it cannot be enjoyable. Not every meal needs to be nutritionally constructive either.

      And, it must also be said, for him to dismiss categorically the value of getting children INTO reading - getting them to understand that the words on the pages can convey a story as rousing, fascinating, or frightening as any movie or video game - is simply ignorant. I rather suspect that Mr. Lezard has no children nor really any interaction with same, except perhaps as frightening little beasts underfoot that must be tolerated when the family comes over for holidays.

      --
      -Styopa
    6. Re:In other Harry Potter news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. How do you manage to make your nose turn up that far?

      Oh, wait, I'd better use the Random Capitalization that you did:

      How do you Manage to make your Nose Turn Up that far?

      Twit.

    7. Re:In other Harry Potter news... by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "An insightful Guardian columnist..."

      From what I recall of the Guardian, the primary purpose of their entertainment and lifestyle columnists is to derisively sneer at everything not esoteric or unattainable. If more than six people in London like something, it is inherently crap.

      I approached the Harry Potter books with a great deal of cynicism and distrust, and actually found that they're GOOD TO READ! They're not complex stories, the writing isn't Nabokov or even Gaiman, but they're better than most.

      Consider this: The average 'best-seller' is manufactured tripe. Stephen King is a surprisingly good writer (read some of his short fiction), but he's never let that get in the way of writing simple horror dreck for mass consumption and blockbuster sales. Then there's the fine works of Danielle Steel, Jilly Cooper, and other bestselling authors. In comparison, Rowling wrote some good stories that are fun and involving to read. They're not flawless certainly, but they're above average.

      "...for a highly-educated woman like Rowling to knock out the same kind of material is, shall we say, somewhat disappointing."

      So it's not acceptable for adults to write to children? That's a fascinating opinion! Remember, these books weren't initially targeted at adults--they were WRITTEN FOR KIDS! Adults started reading them because they're better than most other heavily-marketed books out there.

      Methinks that the columnist needs to read some prose from actual nine-year-olds.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    8. Re:In other Harry Potter news... by popejeremy · · Score: 1

      Only two kinds of fiction readers? Bull Shit. I'm option three.

      3) The kind of a guy who enjoys escaping into a good story, but who is unable to escape into a cliche fantasy world written by an illiterate twit.

      The book has to be good to do its job well. If it's not doing its job well, I can't enjoy it. There's nothing wrong with saying that some books are better than others.

    9. Re:In other Harry Potter news... by mikee805 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not every meal needs to be nutritionally constructive either. This reminds me of something that I heard Wolfgang Puck say in an interview for his latest cook book (to paraphrase):

      A meal is something you sit down to with good friends and enjoy with good wine. Not something you get at a drive thru. He went on to say basically that he has never eaten at a dive, fast food place or greasy spoon and does not consider that eating.

      After hearing that I thought of all that he is missing if he only eats fine dining.

      Same goes for literature if you only read classics then you are missing out on a lot. Imagine not ever eating at your favorite pizza joint or getting those great burgers. That is what you missing if you only read "great" literature.

      *BTW this particular book he was proud of since "you can find all of the ingredients [for the recipes] in your supermarket."
      --
      B5 71 ED FB 55 D6 4E 68 07 25 E2 FA CA 93 F0 2F, is mine! All mine!
    10. Re:In other Harry Potter news... by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps you missed the part where I said "Reading - and the pleasure therefrom - is an intensely personal experience"?

      So you find her world cliche (I do too). While I'd agree that her writing level is extremely low (even granted she's writing mainly for children) I'd hardly call her technically illiterate. Clearly she can read, and has a modicum of writing ability - how many books have you written that have sold over a million copies?

      Read my post again, and perhaps a 3rd time. There IS nothing wrong with saying a book is good or bad. The fallacy is the prescriptive conclusion: "you should/shouldn't like this ipso facto because I did/didn't".

      It's really my fault: maybe I should have phrased my post to a lower reading level, and placed it in a cliche setting - then maybe it would have been clearer.

      --
      -Styopa
  53. Quality by mallenman · · Score: 1

    For one..the quality isnt bad at all. Completely readable by anyone with half a brain. There are maybe 3 or 4 pages in the whole thing, most toward the very beginning where a half a page is messed up by exposure, and you have to adjust the contrast to read it fine. As for the serial number or exif data..sorry, there isn't any. Only real data is photo resolution and exposure info and that it is a canon eos digital rebel. This wasn't released to ruin it for people. You can hate him if you want, but he has done a lot of us favors who don't want to spend a great deal of money on books. This isn't just a harry potter thing either, a lot of books are released in digital form early, and almost all books are eventually. He should be applauded for his courage and creativity for managing to photograph an entire book in 45 minutes with the quality that he did. Sure, we can all be mad at him/her for pissing off the richest woman in England by releasing the book early, but to be honest I could really not give a damn.

    1. Re:Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If, as you say, you "don't want to spend a great deal of money on books", you can simply not read it. It is just a children's story, no one would force you to read it. Furthermore, the price of such book is not expensive at all. If parents can afford to buy such book for their children, any one with a job should not have any problem buying it. Reading the book by bittorrent without paying for it is essentially the same as stealing a book from a book store and reading it. Moreover, the author has spent at least hundreds of day to write it, and you seems to think that it is OK to read the author's fruit of labour without paying for the book. By you way of thinking, it would be OK to steal a car for whose who don't want to spend a great deal of money on car. This kind of behaviour is wrong, because stealing is wrong. You should also be ashamed that you claim that the illegal photographer of the book "should be applauded for his courage and creativity". If the photographer has any courage and creativity, he has the same level of courage and creativity as that of a bank robber. But instead of putting his so called courage and creativity to good use, he choose to use it to steal from others. He is in fact a criminal who should be punished according to the laws.

    2. Re:Quality by uglydog · · Score: 1

      What do you mean there isn't any exif data? This is what I get with "exifprobe -L IMG_3624.jpg":
      JPEG.APP1.Ifd0.Exif.MakerNote.CameraSerialNo = 560151117 = '3A4D14925'

    3. Re:Quality by mallenman · · Score: 1

      I guess I stand corrected. The copies I have must have been stripped. I just ran my own exifprobe and it didnt come back with that information. Just to satisfy my curiosity, what is the timestamps on the files you have?

    4. Re:Quality by uglydog · · Score: 1

      The first file has a timestamp of 2007:07:15 20:39:58 and the last file has a timestamp of 2007:07:16 00:14:12, but there isn't any timezone info

    5. Re:Quality by mallenman · · Score: 1

      Ah...different timestamps on mine. Almost 6 hours later. Sorry about the confusion, and thanks for the correction.

  54. Someone shot John Lennon? Gee, thanks... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone shot John Lennon? Gee, thanks.

    I was just starting to enjoy this Beatles biography but you've ruined it for me now...

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Someone shot John Lennon? Gee, thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trinity dies Matrix Reloaded

    2. Re:Someone shot John Lennon? Gee, thanks... by John+Boone · · Score: 3, Funny

      The walrus was Paul

  55. Like shooting John Lennon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hell no - for one thing, nobody is being killed here. But besides that, I frankly don't think it's that big of a deal. In fact, I'd say it's sadder that there are so many people who are so worried about a mediocre series of books.

    I read the first four, and stopped there as it became evident that "JK Rowling" was in over her head. The first one was cute, the next few were passable, but she's really not that great of an author. Her last few books seem to reek of "I want to write serious literature", in the sort of undergraduate-english-major kind of way, while still covering all the mandatory bases to allow for the massive commercialization of the series that has made her one of the richest people in England (and one of the richest women alive).

    I can console myself somewhat in that at least it's better than television. Still, I cry a bit inside whenever I see/hear Harry Potter being compared to Lord of the Rings or other true fantasy literature (and granted JRR Tolkien was still not the greatest writer ever, but he was a hell of a lot more original - I mean, he invented orcs, and many other core fantasy concepts). I feel like we're raising a generation that may read a bit, sure, but when they're grown up they're going to be going for the John Grisham and the Stephen King, not the Kurt Vonnegut, Douglas Adams, James Joyce, etc...

    So to get back to the point, spoiling this book is nothing like killing John Lennon or anybody else. In fact, any book that relies this much on suspense about "who dies at the end?!?!" is already a bad book. Twist endings are not unheard of in good literature, but still it is the journey that is more important than the destination, and it seems that Harry Potter fans have forgotten this fact.

  56. If you RTFA (read the ficticious alternative)... by mrbluze · · Score: 4, Funny

    Harry Potter Leaked Via Handheld Camera

    Harry Potter survived an electric shock to his wand recently after an unfortunate accident which occurred during an argument between himself and Hermione at the girl's toilets. Rumors are abounding as to the exact details of the incident, but it has been corroborated by the Ministry of Madness that a handheld PC running on high voltage cells was in the possession of Hermione at the time of the incident. Alternative accounts of the incident state that in fact Harry Potter was having a leak at the boys' toilets whilst holding hands with Hermione (hence 'hand held leak'), whereas others refer to Harry Potter misinterpreting Hermione's comment about his personal computer being rather small. "I am not pea sized!" he was quoted as saying, shortly before his wand exploded.


    Harry is currently recovering in bed and is due to have laser removal of a jagged tattoo that has developed on his lower body.

    (source: AFP/Routers)



    --
    Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
  57. Bruce Schneier comments by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    Here.

    Here's the essence of what he has to say:
    "I don't think it was possible to keep the book under wraps."
    "There are simply too many people who must be trusted in order for the security to hold."
    "My guess is that the publishers will lose zero sales"

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  58. Date Rape in Chapter 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Onion offers a pungent satire about Harry Potter

    By John Orr
    Sunday, June 10th, 2007 at 4:38 pm in Celebrities, TV, Books, General, Harry Potter.

    OK, darlings, if you are very sensitive, and/or perhaps young, and/or perhaps very, very protective about J.K. Rowling and her magical Harry Potter, DO NOT, repeat, DO NOT click on this link, which will take you to a spoof on The Onion web site.

    It is a well done spoof that purports to be a TV news report, with a tape of "J.K. Rowling" supposedly talking on the radio and saying that there would be a date rape in Chapter Five of the new book. The chapter will be titled "Blood on the Cloak."

    It had always been her plan to have a date rape in the last book, says the "Rowling" voice, but it was always just a matter of "who, or what, that rapist would be."

    Then there are some interviews in bookstores with young people, including one young woman who says she thinks the rape would be probably accomplished with the help of magic-based roofies, and a lad who thinks that Hagrid will be the rapist.

    Well, calm down, Magical Folk! It's all just a joke, and it does accomplish what satire is supposed to do, which is to make a valid comment on something of interest to people.

    In this case, in part, it sort of takes a shot at the real J.K. Rowling, who has announced that someone was always going to die in Book Seven, but that as the writing went along, she realized two people would have to die.

    In a way ... The Onion satire points out what a horrible thing that is -- that Rowling plans to kill two major characters in "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows." And that she has said so publicly, which some cynical types might say is just a marketing ploy.

    But ... nah, it's not just a marketing ploy. I think Ms. Rowling and her publishers have done some masterful marketing over the years, and this may be part of it ... but it can also be said that while increasing interest in the books, she is also warning her readers to be emotionally prepared for the last book.

    I think Rowling is very sincere about wanting to treat her readers right, which she has always done.

    But still ... the spoof, is pretty funny. By the way ... if you look behind the "anchor man," it looks like the background is animated.

  59. Harry Potter, the Action Movie by Animats · · Score: 1

    This thing reads like the script for a Jerry Bruckheimer action movie.

  60. Accio charm by themr2man · · Score: 2, Funny

    All one needs to do in order to find the culprit who took the pictures is take up their wand and say "Accio" (assuming it would work from long distances).

  61. Half Life 2 by EGenius007 · · Score: 1

    I hope they go Valve and get it right before releasing it for real...


    Not because I cared about either finished product, but I do enjoy watching all my friends with a case of (figurative--or in this case, literary) blue balls.

    --
    I know what you did last summer. Just kidding, I don't work at the NSA.
  62. html version already available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those photos must have been good enough for basic OCR, since I'm seeing a html version of the book out there already too.

    (The last Potter book it took 24 hours after to get a good html edition out, so this is what, 4 days earlier than last time?)

  63. It is a marketing gimmick, book is illegible. by liftphreaker · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine d/l'd this and showed me. The stuff is pretty much illegible. This looks more like a media stunt to whip people up into a frenzy before the actual launch.

  64. Bet it's a Marketing Ploy! by lewildbeast · · Score: 1

    Yes, I couldn't resist downloading this to check it out for myself. Not because I'm a Harry Potter fan, but because I'm curious what effect this will have on my wife (who IS a HUGE fan!) Anyway, for those not in the know, the last few chapters are missing (how coincidental). I doubt it was accidental. What better way to boost sales of the possibly last book than to stage a 'fake' leak where the last chapters are missing! So what does slashdot think, was it a PLANNED leak, or was it a fan that got too carried away? Rgds, Beast

  65. Your looking at it wrong by geekoid · · Score: 1

    It is very good for the demographic it is being written for.

    Here is a clue: IT'S NOT FOR YOU.

    It's for people who haven't even had the opportunity to master the fine art of the english language.

    "hildren exposed to this kind of writing aren't learning anything new about words, or being stretched in any way; as Harold Bloom said, they're not going to be inspired to go off and read the Alice books, or any other enduring classic."

    100% completly wrong and ustter bull crap. Kids who had NO INTEREST in reading anything read it. Then go off to find other books to read.

    IT has done a wonderfull thing for inspiring a generation to read.

    ah, here we go, your a fucking poor excuse for a limp wristed cum stain trolll.

    "All the Potter franchise does, like 99% of TV and Hollywood output, is entrench the hold of pointless and mediocre culture."

    Either you haven't read them, or you have missed the underlying themes through out the book. Possible you have no clue on the elements of myth as well.

    nit wit

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Your looking at it wrong by RevWhite · · Score: 1

      Your mastery of the English language and sharp-tongued wit shall certainly serve to silence all your critics.

      --
      Hey, can I bum a sig?
  66. Pirateer by Le+Marteau · · Score: 5, Informative

    On many pages the pirateer's hands are in the pictures

    Perhaps you mean 'pirate'? 'Pirateer' is not a word ('privateer' is, of course, a word, but clearly not meant here).

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    1. Re:Pirateer by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Maybe he had a letter of marque from Spain authorizing him to violate English copyrights.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    2. Re:Pirateer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Letters, not letter. Of Marque & Reprisal.

      And if he did, who do I have to contact in the Spanish government to get my own? First the Spice Girls, then Harry Potter. English barbarity has for too long gone unpunished.

  67. Useless by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    Since nobody makes a e-book reader that's worth a crap anyhow.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  68. Gazing into crystal ball... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    I forsee the dark lord (MPAA) calling forth his Death Eaters (lawyers) and making
    up a new curse (law/DMCA) claiming movie infringement because now they can't make
    a movie based on the book...there already is one. (haha, bah-dum-ching)

    Part of me laughs at this, but you know, honestly, I would NOT put it past them.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  69. Re:Harry is raped by a horse and dies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think harry rapes the horse rather the other way around. and voldemort got his a$$ raped my Muhammad's army of madmen rode out the deserts of arabia.

  70. What is the big deal? by HycoWhit · · Score: 1

    Not quite sure what the big deal is over the release of a crap-ton of low quality jpeg images. HP7 has been available in .PDF form since the end of April... Spoiling the book is a different topic. No clue what motivates people to ruin a movie or book for someone else.

    1. Re:What is the big deal? by freedomlinux · · Score: 1

      Well, it is a bit of a big deal...
      It is the long-anticipated conclusion to an internationally-acclaimed series. While I believe that this will not affect sales, considering that not many people will bother with reading the images before Saturday and most followers would buy a book anyway.

      The difference, however, between these images and previous PDFs is that this is quite obviously directly from the book, and therefore accurate, and not simple text PDF of unknown origin. BTW: most (if not all) of the previous PDF were well-crafted fan versions, but fake. Just a note...

  71. Re:Who in their right mind (P.S.: Voldemort dies) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who? Harry Potter fans, of course.
    To be honest, this tells more about the fans than the books.

  72. Who gives a shit? by devnulljapan · · Score: 0, Troll

    Really? Come on...Who gives a shit about this? It's not like it's actually literature. hats off to JKR for all the money she's made and for getting little kids into reading again but it's Famous Five Go Casting a Spell without the lashings of ginger beer. I can't believe anyone over the age of 12 gives a damn.

  73. Folks Just Don't Want to enjoy life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You know, folks are wanting to see or read the ending before they invest the time and energy into something when they might not like the ending."

    Good thing life doesn't have something like that, otherwise no one would be born.

  74. Re:The main problem...Unreciprocal actions. by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

    Piss of you self righteous idiot. Anyone willing to pirate a book and read it on the screen is willing to buy it. It says something about you that you throw out unsubstantiated claims carelessly. Can I substantiate my claim? Yes, I've downloaded the book and am also buying the book. I'm a pirater and I'm ethical. FUCK OFF!

  75. Re:Except by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

    You are incorrect

  76. Don't be a pretentious ass by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm re-reading the Potter books for the first time, and yes, Rowlings weaknesses as a writer do shine through.

    So what?

    It's still a fun series. Not every movie needs to be Casablanca; the occasional plot light, special effects heavy movie can be fun sometimes. Not every song needs to be the Ode to Joy, sometimes it's fun to just sing along to some mindless, repetitive pop. We should eat our veggies, but the occasional candy is just fine for our health and a pleasant treat. Not every novel needs to be Brave New World, sometimes I want to enjoy some light fantasy about a kid exploring a magical world.

    As for the claim that Potter is somehow bad for kids, that is utter nonsense. The reality is that most American kids really don't like reading. Hell, most American adults don't like reading. Forcing them to read "good" books (for just about any definition of "good") will just make them resentful and believe that books are something unpleasant to be avoided. I believe that's why so many Americans don't read; their emotional response to books linked mandatory book lists full of books that don't interest them. I can assure you that absent the Potter series those kids aren't going to magically start reading the Alice books. Books that the kids enjoy, even bad ones, encourage kids to read, convince them that books and other long form reading can be good. They may not enjoy any given "enduring classic" (for whatever definition you like), but any kid whose made it through Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix isn't going to be terribly daunted when facing 1984. Indeed, during my childhood I was strongly encouraged to read, but given wide freedom in what I read. I chose to read trashy fantasy. When I grew up and was assigned, say Madame Bovary in translation*, I blew through it while my classmates were bitching about how long and hard it was. After reading the first few Shannara novels in grade school, it was nothing. Reading begets reading. People who become serious readers tend to devour anything they can get their hands on. Maybe the bulk of their reading diet is romance novels, technothrillers, or fantasy, but they do occasionally read branch out and read other things. The people who fear books never do.

    You and the Guardian writer are not enlightening all us ignorant savages that Rowling is a bad writer. No, you're just being a pretentious ass. It's not enough for you to enjoy the books you enjoy, you need to reach out and actively piss on the books other people enjoy. You're not changing anyone's mind. You're just enjoying being superior by your own tortured definition of superior. That makes you an ass.

    * (Unless your goal is to make kids resent books as a source of long, boring, completely pointless crap, don't assign them Madame Bovary. I promise you that high school students will not appreciate it on any level.)

    1. Re:Don't be a pretentious ass by NoMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      (Unless your goal is to make kids resent books as a source of long, boring, completely pointless crap, don't assign them Madame Bovary. I promise you that high school students will not appreciate it on any level.)
      I couldn't be bothered reading it for my book report, and rented the movie of "Madame Ovary" instead.

      Boy, was that a mistake...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    2. Re:Don't be a pretentious ass by Hatta · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure, and by the same token not every post needs to be +5 informative. Sometimes it's fun to just troll.

      You are not enlightening us that trolling is bad. No you're just being a pretentious ass. It's not enough for you to enjoy the posts you enjoy, you need to reach out and actively piss on the posts other people enjoy. You're not changing anyone's mind. You're just enjoying being superior by your own tortured definition of superior. That makes you an ass.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Don't be a pretentious ass by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      God, when did books become a sub-genre of media like "Country Music"... this is so sad.

      Harry Potter is poor teenage fiction, it's poor fantasy and in it's entirity it's poorly plotted, poorly written, and shallow.

      There are plenty of other "fun" books that also stimulate the mind, this isn't an either or proposition and accepting the fact that most people read this drivel (especially in this case, a text that's popular because it's popular).

      It's sad that books have become so commercialized and marginalized a product of major media that even the limited marketing buzz generated by Harry Potter can cause such market domination, by such an inferior product.

  77. Spoiler alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know, I know... Snape kills Trinity with Rosebud, right?

  78. The main problem...Guilty Conscious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're going to name call, then get it right? It's "Piss off!" Second, no anyone willing to read a pirated copy isn't going to buy the book. The people who are going to buy the book don't need a pirated copy to tell them that J.K Rowling is a good author and has proven it through six books. They're also going to buy because they give a damn about the author, and would like her to continue writing even if it isn't Harry Potter.

    "It says something about you that you throw out unsubstantiated claims carelessly. "

    Says that I hit the mark if I got you all riled up.

    "Can I substantiate my claim? Yes, I've downloaded the book and am also buying the book. I'm a pirater and I'm ethical. FUCK OFF!"

    Well unless you're willing to provide a lot more information than you already have. I'm afraid that you haven't proven anything except a guilty conscious.

    1. Re:The main problem...Guilty Conscious. by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      Regardless of your faulty reasoning, you're still wrong as I've pointed out. The facts don't substantiate the theory. As for my guilty conscious, what a load of crap - I've already shown I have no need for a guilty conscious and that should have been implicitly obvious in my original point. Thank you for not contesting that you're a dickhead. At least we agree on something.

  79. Re:The spoilers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does fight club have to do with hermione and ginny getting killed off?

  80. Captain Pirate & the Pirateers by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    > 'Pirateer' is not a word ('privateer' is, of course, a word, but clearly not meant here).

    I apologize for the following in advance, but in my defense, they started it with the insipid "Captain Copyright" (I wonder if he was based on Captain Planet, too?) But all that "Pirateer" talk made me think of the following:

    -----

    Captain Pirate, he's our hero,
    Gonna take copyright down to zero,
    He's our distribution magnified,
    And he's fighting on the pirate's side

    Captain Pirate, he's our hero,
    Gonna take copyright down to zero,
    Gonna help him put us under,
    Bad guys who like to sue and plunder.

    (MAFIAA exec shouting:)
    "You'll pay for this Captain Pirate!"

    (chanting)
    We're the Pirateers,
    You can be one too!
    'Cause saving our network is the thing to do,
    Looting the public is not the way,
    Hear what Captain Pirate has to say:

    "THE PUBLIC DOMAIN IS YOURS!!"

  81. Nobody cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that you think you're better than all of us. Nobody reads Harry Potter because they think in 20 years people will consider it a literary classic. They read it because the story is interesting and entertaining. Besides, do we need to hear that the writing style is immature when the series was originally written for children? Whoever wrote that article was wasting his time.

    Maybe what you really wanted to do in posting this is completely change the subject and bitch about how the culture is more focused on self indulgence and mindless entertainment than on enriching the mind with art and whatnot. But nobody really cares, because one guy yelling "You're all stupid!" doesn't make people want to read the classics. If people want entertainment, there's nothing you can do to change that.

    1. Re:Nobody cares... by arth1 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      An understandably Anonymous Coward wrote:

      Besides, do we need to hear that the writing style is immature when the series was originally written for children?

      Unless we want our children to stagnate, yes, we do. Since there's plenty of books for children that do hold literary qualities, and with childhood being as short as it is, there's no need for exposing children to books beneath their level.

      I'd rather have mine broaden their minds with Roald Dahl, Terry Pratchett and Philip Pullman than having them end up at the level of J. K. Rowlings and Nora Roberts.
    2. Re:Nobody cares... by Petrushka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd rather have mine broaden their minds with Roald Dahl, Terry Pratchett and Philip Pullman than having them end up at the level of J. K. Rowlings and Nora Roberts.

      Whatever qualities Terry Pratchett has, they are not as a writer of children's books. And I would rather have my kids reading J.K. Rowling than C.S. Lewis anyday. Rowling certainly has weaknesses as a writer; Lewis has all those weaknesses plus more -- moral, as well as literary. (No argument with Dahl and Pullman, mind you; but there aren't that many other children's writers who are more worth reading than Rowling. I'd rather read Harry Potter to the kids than the Wombles, say.)

    3. Re:Nobody cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am guessing you are the kind of guy who yells at his daughter for not fingerpainting something on the level of pollock?

    4. Re:Nobody cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Childrens books do not need to be written in a childish manner and in fact the good ones aren't.

      I don't think the criticism is that the books are written in a style particulary suitable for children but that JK Rowling has the writing style of a child which is an entirely different thing.

      It's true that lots of people seem to enjoy these Harry Potter books but they would probably enjoy the 'literary classics' ( good books ) even more.

      This whole thing is just a fad and whilst people are obviously free to read what they like I just it's a shame they're wasting their time with rubbish when there are so many brilliant alternatives out there for them to try.

    5. Re:Nobody cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, as we all know, the Victorians were right, and children are actually just tiny adults, and should all be treated as such.

    6. Re:Nobody cares... by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Unless we want our children to stagnate, yes, we do.

      I don't believe that you and I have had children together.

      (In other words, this is a decision that should be made by individual families.)

  82. Nightmare! by John+Boone · · Score: 1

    Everyone gets married! Hell and desolation reign! 19 years after the events in the book they all wish they were dead. I can almost foresee book 8, in which Harry goes to Mordor to throw the ring in Mount Doom. :))

  83. Wrong question... by msimm · · Score: 1

    Who the hell uses a digital camera to encode a book in the first place? Talk about annoying. I almost feel bad for the guy/gal.

    And as for the impact, books are good to lay down in bed with. Take to the park. Sit at the couch. Anything I'm intent on reading is on paper. ASCII/HTML if I *have* to. But fuzzy images? No thanks.

    I think this is more of a story then an event. Marginally interesting, but useless.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  84. Table by SnarfQuest · · Score: 4, Funny

    To do this properly, you are supposed to use a WOODEN table!

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    1. Re:Table by laejoh · · Score: 0

      As the daily wtf teaches us! Thank you Sir for mentioning that wonderful site on this wondertful site :)

  85. Fanwank... by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 0

    first of all, lololdnews. the first half of the book was out over 48 hours ago and the full thing was loose over 24 hours ago.

    that said, the most entertaining part of all of this was watching the people who've pinned their hearts and souls on one particular ending progress deeper into denial.

    "the scans of the epilogue must be fake! photoshop! i can tell by the pixels!"
    "the photos of the epilogue must be fake!"
    "the scans of the first 500 pages must be fake!"
    "the whole thing must be fake!"

    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  86. Just read it by Brazilian+Geek · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I suck for reading 700+ pages of crappy photographs but considering that I'm on vacation and had a lot of time to spare, I went ahead and read it.

    I do confess that I have no intention of spoiling the story (I won't even say if I liked it or not) unless some anti-spoiler crybaby starts screaming, after I mention, in casual conversation, that I read the book, that I should respect their inability to read a f*cking book until the movie comes out in 2009 (maybe).

    --
    All browsers' default homepage should read: Don't Panic...
  87. Blame Canada! by HannethCom · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one has blamed us yet. After all, if you believe the movie industry, we are the biggest pirates in the world no? Of course if you read the statistics that the movie industry releases, it doesn't support that conclusion. Though they probably follow George Bush's ideas, "I will never apologize for the United States of America? I don't care what the facts are."

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
  88. SPOILER! Everybody is the villian!!!! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Now, wait... that was Orient Express.

  89. I agree! It's a MARKETING gimmick! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Because I heard the publisher was really afraid of not selling any copies without some sort of dorky marketing trick.

  90. This may be a hoax by Animats · · Score: 0

    I've been reading some of the book images. It reads like a hoax. "And Hermione was struggling to her feet in the wreckage, and three redheaded men were grouped on the ground where the wall had blasted apart". That reads like fan fiction. Rowling's style is considerably more polished.

    If this isn't a hoax, the book really sucks.

    1. Re:This may be a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rowling's style is considerably more polished.

      Um... no it isn't.

  91. Re:The spoilers by compro01 · · Score: 1

    excellent more suspense. i have to find out if these spoilers are true!

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  92. Re:Except by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    contrary to what the article states, most of the book is unreadable, and the ending is missing..
    That isn't really accurate. At least, not on all of the copies being passed around. Some parts are tough to read, but the majority of it was fairly clear.
  93. marketing~~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that it's a marketing ploy. Perhaps rowling hired someone to make a crap fanfic-y version and had Scholastic bind it in an authentic way, and then had someone take pictures like this.

  94. Oh goddamnit... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

    Now I'm going to have to completely avoid the Internet to avoid having the book spoiled. On the other hand, that meme from Order of the Phoenix did give me an interesting perspective as I read it. For once, I saw what some innocuous event was about beforehand.

    PS: Oh, and fuck whoever posted that spoiler halfway down. Fuck you with reciprocating saw.

  95. Re:Except by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the ending is missing

    How much would you like to bet?

    "The scar had not pained Harry for nineteen years. All was well."

  96. More Spoilers by MartinB · · Score: 1
    • Snape is Kaiser Zhoze
    • Dumbledore is a woman
    • Hagrid is dead, really
    • Neville is The One
    • James Potter is part of Harry's Split Personality
    • Butterbeer is made of people (Muggles though, so that's OK)
    • Voldemort is Hermione's father
    • Slytherin House sacrifice Prof McGonagall
    --

    The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

  97. Already spoiled right here on Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some clown posted spoilers + the last line of the book yesterday in the comments section of another post, totally unannounced, unwarned. Nice.

  98. Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least now I can read the book peacefully without bothering about the ending. :) This thing would not cause a loss for the publishers, because anyone who really wants to buy the book will buy it, and those who dont would get a e-book for themselves later anyways. I myself was planning to read a electronic version first, and then buy the book when the rush subsides.

  99. YE OLDE SPOILER TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That raises an interesting question. Is the Vader thing still a spoiler?
    Malcolm's army carry the branches of Birnam Wood to disguise their numbers. MacDuff was from his mother's womb untimely ripp'd. Malcolm's army carry the branches of Birnam Wood to disguise their numbers. MacDuff was from his mother's womb untimely ripp'd. Malcolm's army carry the branches of Birnam Wood to disguise their numbers. MacDuff was from his mother's womb untimely ripp'd. Malcolm's army carry the branches of Birnam Wood to disguise their numbers. MacDuff was from his mother's womb untimely ripp'd. Malcolm's army carry the branches of Birnam Wood to disguise their numbers. MacDuff was from his mother's womb untimely ripp'd. Malcolm's army carry the branches of Birnam Wood to disguise their numbers. MacDuff was from his mother's womb untimely ripp'd.
    1. Re:YE OLDE SPOILER TROLL by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute, Hamlet DIES?!!! OMGWTFBBQ!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    2. Re:YE OLDE SPOILER TROLL by Darby · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute, Hamlet DIES?!!! OMGWTFBBQ!

      Yes. He does. And a damn good thing too in my book. Indecisive whining little pussy.

  100. Re:Except by pionzypher · · Score: 1

    Just in case this AC parent isn't viewed... Indeed it is quite readable. There are three pages towards the beginning of the book that aren't quite in focus. A few of the pages weren't pushed down all the way, loosing a few words close to the spine.

    All in all though it's very readable. Unrared to a folder and viewed in gqview, it's nearly as convenient as reading a pdf.


    Really not sure if I should post this, but it's rapidshare. Eh... Rar File

    --
    I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
  101. Ob. Monty Python quote by Ctrl-Alt-Del · · Score: 2, Funny

    "We Australians find American beer pretty much like making love in a canoe. It's f*cking close to water."

    --
    "Life is like a sewer - what you get out of it depends on what you put into it" - Tom Lehrer
    1. Re:Ob. Monty Python quote by Phleg · · Score: 1

      American beer is some of the best in the world, if you discount our macro brews. Stone, Rogue, North Coast, Highland, Ommegang, etc. are all excellent. What, exactly, does Australia have in the way of good micros?

      --
      No comment.
    2. Re:Ob. Monty Python quote by Darby · · Score: 1

      American beer is some of the best in the world, if you discount our macro brews. Stone, Rogue, North Coast, Highland, Ommegang, etc. are all excellent. What, exactly, does Australia have in the way of good micros?

      It's just an old joke that lost its meaning in the 80s when we had the micro brew revolution. I think some people didn't get the memo that we have a lot more than Bud, Coors, and Miller. My wife is English and loves beer. We went to England over Christmas and we both were surprised by how bland the offerings were compared to the multitude of good American beers. They weren't that bad, just not nearly as good.

    3. Re:Ob. Monty Python quote by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Ever tried Nail Ale, Feral, anything from Cowamerup? And that's just local to my state.

      America is truly famous for Miller, Coors, etc. Sadly, Australia is likewise famous for Fosters, which nobody actually drinks. The Fosters export lager is sold here as Crown lager, which is popular amongst the mainstream yuppie types.

      But, it's also undeniable that the American macro brews are famous for low alcohol content and flimsy taste. Even Australian macro brews outperform them in terms of flavour characteristics and alcohol content, so you can easily see the validity behind the "close to water" euphamism.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  102. Harry and Ginny get married and have three kids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you see that one coming? Wish he would have gone for the Asian chick. She was hot.

  103. Hmmm... by 2fuf · · Score: 1

    To me its fairly obvious. To prevent the real book from leaking the publisher has spread several false copies containing bogus storylines. The copy shown here is just a deliberate way of giving pirates no chance. The publisher themselves acknowledged they spent over 20 million to prevent leaking, and spreading false copies (even going through the trouble of writing and printing those) would be an awesome way to surprise everyone. In the chaos of the multitude of versions, the real leaked copy (if there even is one) will be hardly recognizable and therefore safe from publicity.

  104. gotta say it ... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    It's just a farking book. Selling for like $20. And all this reporting on the frenzy of the release is solely designed to DRUM UP SALES. Like totally for sure I like gotta have a copy yes I do...If I were to read it [which I won't, I'll see the movie but that's about it] I'd just spend the $20 for a dead-tree edition instead of trying to read a poorly photographed copy off some bt.

    I wonder what people will do after Harry Potter is done with. Go all frenzied over the the next release of the cable guide?

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  105. just being a pretentious ass by wiredog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't that a requirement to write for the Guardian?

  106. And The Last Line Is.... by hemorex · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Harry Potter, do you want your possessions identified? (y/n/q)"

  107. Just use your time traveling necklace... by realsilly · · Score: 1

    ... to go back a few days before the spoiler and just make sure you somehow leave yourself a clue to not be tempted to read the spoilers you'll see in a couple of day.

    Sheesh! Every good wizard knows about the time traveling necklace by now.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  108. Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never witnessed such a fast torrent. It brought a fucking tear to my eye.

  109. I doesn't matter by Matthieu+Araman · · Score: 1

    people will still buy the book once it's out.
    I don't care waiting a few more days...

  110. Can somebody send dementors after him please? by calags · · Score: 1

    And, no - I did not RTFA just in case there were real spoilers.

    --
    Never attribute to stupidity what can be construed as a monopoly preservation tactic.
  111. Reading = good? by deemon · · Score: 1

    Do you consider reading to be a self-evident good? If so, why? It's a largish value judgment...

    1. Re:Reading = good? by mahlerfan999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you consider reading to be a self-evident good? If so, why? It's a largish value judgment... Given that reading warnings like "bridge is out" and "rat poison: do not ingest" can save your life, well yeah I have to say that I do indeed consider the value of reading to be self-evident!
    2. Re:Reading = good? by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      If I answer, does that prove that it's not self-evident?

      Anyway, reading anything that's professionally edited, no matter what it's about, improves your spelling and grammar instincts. Knowing the actual rules isn't that important if you see enough correct examples.

    3. Re:Reading = good? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Anyway, reading anything that's professionally edited, no matter what it's about, improves your spelling and grammar instincts.

      Which makes you a better writer. Which is only important if reading is important (since the only thing writing can do is produce something to be read). We seem to have a circular argument here :).

      Anyway, reading is important since it gives you access to the collective experience of human race, from stone age to this day. It allows you to learn from other people's mitakes, saving you a lot of pain. It is also a very cheap form of entertainment, and most books don't have unskippable ads and "do not pirate" warnings :).

      I've even heard theories that Cortez beat Montezuma because Aztechs didn't have writing, so Montezuma simply didn't have access to the endless store of dirty tricks Cortez did. Or was it Incas ?...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    4. Re:Reading = good? by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      Which makes you a better writer. Which is only important if reading is important (since the only thing writing can do is produce something to be read). We seem to have a circular argument here :).
      No, I just thought you were talking about something else. I was talking about the benefits of routinely reading for pleasure.

      In addition to what you mentioned, I've read other things about reading doing good things for brain development, and helping abstract thought in general. Of course, part of that was someone complaining about blind people using screen readers all the time and not learning Braille anymore, so I'm not sure it's all that impartial.

  112. I work at Bloomsbury and am familiar with the book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just want to reveal that Darth Vader really IS Luke Skywalker's father. Shocking, isn't it?

  113. you guys arent standing in line? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    For your HP7 book?
    Theres a few silly lines about town.
    Last week people started lining up for the 12:01AM movie at noon. They had eight sold-out midnight shows.

  114. Thank you by Random832 · · Score: 1

    I would like to congratulate Slashdot on not putting any spoilers in TFS.

    I will, of course, not be reading the comments until this weekend.

    --
    We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    1. Re:Thank you by Mister+J · · Score: 1

      It's a shame that somebody managed to [charactername]dies as a tag on the article when I first saw it. Thanks, Slashdot, for being the only site to manage to get a spoiler to me :-(

      --
      Windows moves in mysterious ways, its crashes to perform
  115. A note from J. K. Rowling... by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    On one site where the pirated copy was removed, the JK Rowling left this note:

    "Shame on you! You can't bloody wait for the legitimate book? Don't you know that reading illegal copies of books will make you go blind? I hope your legs grow together, you little bugger."

    I'm more afraid of her than the MPAA/RIAA!

    [this is a joke, btw]

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  116. Camcorders.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Camcorders are a worthless medium for ripping movies.

  117. that's old news by trailbl4zr · · Score: 1

    I don't know how many people know, but the harry potter book has been leaked since mid-july, if not before that. And I'm not talking about bad-quality photos, I'm talking about the original ms word .doc, and .pdf, .rtf, .txt (you name it) adaptions. all if this on the limewire network (I used the open source linux version- frostwire) they're not fake either- I looked through it and I can say without a doubt that only JK Rowling could have written it.

  118. The quality isn't that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I did to fix it was zip all the pictures up and use CDisplay Comic Reader to open that zip file. Right click the page, go into options and turn down the gamma way done (best if you do it on the first page where you can't read the letters). You will get artifacts around the letters; but those washed out, unreadable letters turn readable. There are a few places where it is so glared out you cannot read it, but you can glean around the passage what they are doing.

  119. Obligatory XKCD by Valdrax · · Score: 1
    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  120. Minor impact on a small audience by geek2k5 · · Score: 1

    I suspect that there will be a small number of people who won't buy the book because they can get it for free. Since that group doesn't buy many books anyway, the net impact will be minor, especially since better copies will come out within a week.

    I also suspect that the 'loss' will be more than made up in terms of publicity.

    Personally, I'll wait until I can get my hands on a book club copy so I can save a little cash and still have it in hardcopy. And, unlike my wife, I'll read the book straight through so I can be 'surprized' by the precise details of what happened.

  121. Actually, yes. Trolls in unrelated threads did. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    So, somebody MADE you read the spoilers?

    Actually, yes. Trolls love to inject the spoilers in places where people trying to avoid them wouldn't avoid looking. They might randomly comment in the middle of a thread on a random blog or discussion site.

    Try a brief search of Slashdot for the spoiler from the last book. Note what kinds of articles come up. "Apple's Aperture Reviewed" from May 2005 (two months before release of the book) is one of them, and a glance at the summary shows that there was a post titled with the spoiler. You would certainly find a lot more if Google's snapshots of the pages included posts which had been modded down to -1 below the threshold for a anonymous user (like Google) to see. You could not view Slashdot comments for two whole months without stumbling onto the big spoiler.

    So, yes, smart-ass -- someone did make us read the spoilers. The only thing that mitigated it was the massive amount of fake spoilers being tossed around too. There was enough doubt to keep you in suspense, but when you finally found out which ones were real, they had a lot less emotional impact than they would've had you not known.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  122. YouTube... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    Watch some of the hilarity that ensued when people dropped the "Snape kills Dumbledore" (in one case, via bullhorn no less...) bomb on the renfair rejects lined up at bookstores the last time around.

    "NOOOOOO.... you bastard! How could you? Oh, the humanity!!!", in the finest over-the-top oh-the-humanity voice since the crash of the Hindenberg.

    Sounds like a worthy YouTube project to me. And, if JKR is serious, this is the last opportunity.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  123. Re:Except by notaspunkymonkey · · Score: 1

    its rubbish! - although I have printed out a number of pages and left them dotted around my office :) - they are already drawing quite a bit of attention with everyone wondering where they are coming from hehe -

    is the guy wearing the camera on his head??? - surely he would have been better taking pictures of the actual book rather than the desk / his hands / the carpet etc ...

  124. T-Shirt Party by Chagatai · · Score: 1
    I know it is wrong, but the miscreant in me is looking forward to seeing events where people show up with t-shirts that have spoilers on them to the midnight release parties. The "Snape Kills Dumbledore" meme from when the last book was released could only be heightened by taking any number of the spoilers from these leaked pics. I think it would be especially hysterical to have a gang of eight people or so show up to one of these parties, and each raises their sweatshirt or overshirt to reveal one spoiler underneath each. Then again, my sense of humor can be quite wrong at times.

    --
    --Chag
  125. Re:The main problem...Unreciprocal actions. by heinousjay · · Score: 1

    I'd like to know what stretch of logic allows you to claim that because you did something, anyone else would. It's not an effect I'm familiar with at all.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  126. Actually, I think they meant: Telecine. by sideshow · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecine

    Pointing your $99 camcorder at the movie screen counts as Telecine, but of course it looks like hell. However, the same concept is used to get the movie from the film onto the DVD or VCR tape that you buy in the store.

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

  127. Unexpected benefit by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    But wait...what order will they watch them? If they start with TPM, then they are going to already know about Vader when they get to the "I am your father" scene. It is no spoiler.

    Yeah, but hey, they'll say, "boy, they really got the hang of this movie-making thing by the 4th try".

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  128. Troll? Read some history. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Someone's either being very nationalistic or grossly ignorant of Middle Eastern and Southeast Asian history.

    Ever wonder how three distinct, relatively regionally separated groups like the Shia Arabs, the Sunni Arabs, and the Kurds all got lumped into one country with a minority in charge? Thank Britain colonial rule of Iraq.

    Same question for the ethnic divisions of Afghanistan? Same answer.

    Want to understand why Muslims and Hindus were at each others throats at the end of British rule of India? Thank British divide-and-control strategies for ruling the empire.

    Nearly every intra-national ethnic and religious conflict over the past century in Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia can trace its roots back to the effects of colonial Europe and its policies of balancing ethnic enemies against one another. Had most of these groups remained in separate nation states, most of this conflict would not be present. I single out the British because they were the nation most in control of the Middle East and Southeast and Central Asia where the majority of predominantly Muslim nations are located, and it was the British who set up the modern geographical borders of the nations in those areas.

    This is history. Deal with it.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  129. See you monday! by Baikala · · Score: 1

    On several sites that allow commenting, people are posting the spoilers. I've already had the book ruined for me unexpectedly :P (since it was a week before release)...
    That's why I stoped reading HP forums and news sites a week ago..wait... why am I reading a post about Harry Potter being leaked? See you Monday!
    --
    16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
  130. Tagging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh. The tags are just someone's perverted sense of humor and not an actual spoiler, right?

    Right?

    1. Re:Tagging? by neminem · · Score: 1

      Nope, I've read it - every single person on the planet dies at the end. Hermione, Harry, Ron, Voldemort, Ginny, Hagrid, Snape, Dudley, Vernon, that random guy that gave Harry some money at the beginning of the first book. They all die.

      I haven't actually read it, by the way, but I'm assuming it's a joke.

  131. Harry can't die by Lank · · Score: 1

    Otherwise, how could Al Gore's head write about him in his book, "Harry Potter and the Balance of Earth?" It won't get written until the 31st century!

    --
    Gotta get me one of these!
  132. Re:The main problem...Unreciprocal actions. by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

    Its called inductive reasoning and it the reason the grue paradox is not taken seriously. The OP started out with a theory rather than the facts, in this case, or my case, anecdotal evidence. If anyone is guilty of bad science, it is not me.

  133. Re:Except by Cardcaptor_RLH85 · · Score: 1

    Truthfully that counts as a spoiler too. It shows who doesn't die ^_^ And as far as those pictures go I'm at the beginning of chapter eighteen now and it's ok page 30 really sucks and I had to find a pdf transcription of Chapters 1-10 for that but all is well. I'm still buying the book (after all, I have the other six on my bookshelf) and I'll have fun debating at borders Friday night on if reading it on the computer from jpg's or reading it from the book the first time is better per say. I say that since I eat when I read a book at least I won't get barbecue sauce on this one like book six >_

  134. Re:Just read it *spoilers* by ultranova · · Score: 1

    Here is how Harry Potter dies. He slits his fucking wrists because he realized he is like the shitdot sheeple, a lowly fucktard who should be eliminated from the gene pool.

    Nah, the truth is that Harry is actually both Dumbledore and Voldemort. After Voldemort kills all his friends he uses Hermione's watch to go to the past and stop him, but fails again and again because, after all, time paradoxes are not allowed. He finally realizes that his only chance is to replace young Voldemort before he is first met by the wizarding world, and so he kills Tom Riddle a day before Dumbledore arrives for him. This murder splits Harry's soul, forming a horcrux and causing him to go slightly insane.

    Since he is in reality 17 and an accomplished wizard, Harry is separated from his new classmates and can confide in no one; even Dumbledore is seemingly hostile. In the following decades, he gets increasingly unstable, and when he finds out that his mother is having an affair with Severus Snape he attacks in rage, accidentally killing the man he thought was his father and his mother. It is not, however, until Harry/Voldemort stands over the broken corpse of Ginny that he realizes just what he has done: there was no Voldemort, just Harry.

    He uses Hermione's time machine once more, but it has suffered damage in combat and malfunctions, throwing him to the year 1820 and then breaking. Harry decides to look for Dumbledore for help; even if the great wizard is still a kid, surely his family must be great too. But he can't find any such family, and besides, while his horcruxes still keep him immortal, they can no longer prevent him from aging due to the time difference between him and them. As his skin wrinkles Harry comes to a realization: he must fill Dumbledore's role.

    Having already spent two lifetimes as a wizard Harry is without peer. "Dumbledore" becomes a living legend, and finally takes over as headmaster of Hogwarts. Then comes the fateful day where Harry picks up his earlier self, Voldemort; knowing what a monster he would become, he can barely contain his hostility.

    Unfortunately for Harry, he speaks in his dreams. This is how Severus Snape finds that it was in fact he who killed his illegitimate lover, Lily Potter. In rage he attacks the weakened Dumbledore, Avada Kedavraving the old bastard out of existence - or so Snape thought; but once more the horcruxes save Harry's life, allowing him to survive as a disembodied spirit and watch while his younger self kills all he cared about while his youngest self is powerless to stop it. Finally, with all the horcruxes destroyed, Harry/Voldemort/Dumpledore departs into whatever awaits him...

    ...which turns out to be Moaning Myrtle. And boy does she live (?) up to her name >;).

    You gotta admit, it would explain why Voldemort and Dumbledore are so much more powerfull than other wizards, why Harry and Voldemort both have wands made from stuff taken from Dumbledore's phoenix, and why Dumbledore didn't just plain apprehend Voldemort when they fought in the Ministry of Magic despite easily overpowering him (he couldn't; the outcome was already history for him).

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  135. Re:Troll? Read some history. by edflyerssn007 · · Score: 1
    There hass been war in the Middle East since thousands of years ago. Babylonian empire, Persian empire, Greeks, Romans, Arabs, etc. So I wouldn't necessarily blame the Britains for a lack of peace in a place that has been seeing war for 1000's of years.

    That is history. Deal with it.
    -Ed
    --
    So you see what had happened was....
  136. did the leak hurt the sales of the book? by Willuknight · · Score: 1

    I've read 3 of the 5 pagges of the discussion about this, and for some reason i haven't seen any mention of the perfecftly readable txt pdf, or ereader versions of the books.

    I downloaded the ereader version at 11pm 20th July NZ time, and read it using the palm application on my palm emulator for Windows Mobile 2003 on my PDA2k.

    I read up to chapter 25 by 4am, before i had to go to sleep, as I have work on saturdays from 9am to 5:30pm. As you can see from me having read more then half the book (there are around 35 chapters in total), i didnt have a problem with the quality of the copy, and while there were a few OCR errors, they didnt detract significantly, and i was easily able to read along with the story. At 12pm on my lunch break, I went out and purchased my copy of the book. Regardless of whether i had a perfect digital copy or not, or even if i had managed to finish the ebook before the hard copy went on sale, I still would have purchased the book regardless.

    --
    Do not anger the Karma Whores, for they don't bathe often, and might decide to come visit you in person. -Ryan Amos
  137. Inter- vs. intra-national conflicts. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Yes, but these were mostly international conflicts. In modern times, we have a much better framework for responding to international conflicts than we do intranational conflicts. See Rwanda for a good example. Rwanda was the result of the Belgians taking two ethnic groups, putting them under one government, and elevating the minority over the majority. The current civil war in Iraq is pretty similar only with a little more even-handedness in the genocide between the Shia and Sunni Arabs.

    Personally, I've come to believe that partitioning the state into three regions and letting the people within them have some political space is the only way the conflict's going to end. That solution has it's own problems (Kurdish conflict with Turkey, Shia closeness to Iran, and Sunni closeness to Syria), but if an end to bloodshed is the highest priority, it's the best solution for that particular problem.

    Similarly, Afghanistan might've been a stable state decades ago if there were power struggles between its four main ethnic groups. Partitioning is not a good idea for us in this case because it would provide no brake on the Taliban-dominated Pashtun regions, but many of the problems we have there wouldn't have been such a problem if they had been four countries in the first place.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").