Slashdot Mirror


iPhone Freed From AT&T, Twice

A very large number of readers sent in stories about one or the other of the two new claims to have unlocked the iPhone for use on other GSM carriers. A New Jersey teenager, George Hotz, posted instructions for unlocking the iPhone using a soldering gun and a lot of patience. This is from coverage in a local NJ paper: "If someone handed him an iPhone new out of the box, he could modify it in 'about an hour,' he said. A person following his directions might take 'a good 12 hours,' the teen estimated." Hotz has put up a YouTube video substantiating his claim, and is conducting an eBay auction for one of his two hacked phones. The other hack is by a commercial outfit called iPhoneSIMfree.com, whose claim Engadget has verified. The company will be selling licenses to the hack, minimum quantity 500, at a price not yet announced. These hacks are much bigger news for those outside America. Expect to see an industry spring up to meet European (and Asian?) demand for freed iPhones.

357 comments

  1. Calling all Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I smell Lawsuits.

    1. Re:Calling all Lawyers by djupedal · · Score: 1

      The guy's blog is not responding - he's got to know this means nothing but heartache for him going forward. What was it...like four guys and three of them conned the kid into going public. Very public...?

    2. Re:Calling all Lawyers by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I smell Lawsuits.

      Lawyers my eye, this is probably covered by the DMCA reverse engineering, same as for unlocking XBoxes and so forth. Simply purchasing an iPhone does not convey complete ownership and the right to dismantle protections under such law. Worse, offering up the modified iPhone on eBay, which I expect to see cancelled, will not simply bring grief from AT&T, but Apple as well. (It's currently up to $15K, which I doubt will be honoured.) It's best if someone does unlock the iPhone for other GSM services to keep their yap shut and use it as they see fit. Sadly, ego must be fed, but at what price?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Calling all Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you buy the product, go to an non-DMCA country, hack it, and then go back?

    4. Re:Calling all Lawyers by el+americano · · Score: 1

      He can afford to pay lawyers. His Ebay auction is over $14,000,000 already, for the second freed iPhone in world history ;-)

      I'd bid myself, but he signed it.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    5. Re:Calling all Lawyers by InvalidError · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I went to check about 30 minutes after your post and it is now up to a rather stupidly high $50k... but there are about a dozen other supposedly unlocked phones on eBay for ~$1k now.

    6. Re:Calling all Lawyers by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The mistake this person made, if it is true that he unlocked the Iphone, is that he should have dissimenated the information as broadly as possible, as rapidly as possible. Now, he's tried to 'profit' from it personally, and there's probably a fat Apple lawyer sitting on his stomach while another fat Apple lawyer ties on the gag.

      He could have gained tremendous geek cred and become another DVD Jon. Instead, now he's just another victim of the Apple legal department. (there are many, stretching back years, to when Apple was running Apple II clones out of business, and wiping out any GUI competitors to Windows on the PeeCee)

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    7. Re:Calling all Lawyers by Garabito · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lawyers my eye, this is probably covered by the DMCA reverse engineering, same as for unlocking XBoxes and so forth. The DMCA prevents the circunvention of DRM technologies for copyright infringing purposes. Whose copyrights (or other kind of IP for that matter) are infringed if you unlock an iPhone you purchased from Apple? It isn't been subsidized in any way from AT&T, nor have you any contractual relationship with them.

      Simply purchasing an iPhone does not convey complete ownership and the right to dismantle protections under such law Gosh. You people are so brainwashed...

    8. Re:Calling all Lawyers by fangorious · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Library of Congress ruled that handsets are not covered by the DMCA.

    9. Re:Calling all Lawyers by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Note that he said "under such law" and not "the law is always right". An understanding of the law does not imply agreement.

    10. Re:Calling all Lawyers by adolf · · Score: 1

      Dear brainwashed,

      In what way does modifying an iPhone constitute a copyright violation or an attempt at bypassing a content protection system for a copyrighted work?

      Your friend,

      Adolf

    11. Re:Calling all Lawyers by vertinox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lawyers my eye, this is probably covered by the DMCA reverse engineering, same as for unlocking XBoxes and so forth.

      I had to look this up but Cell Phones have been ruled to be one of the exceptions to the the DMCA:

      http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061124-8280 .html
      http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/04/legal-to-unlock- cell-phones-since-november-2006/

      Cell Phone providers do not have to provide you with the ability to unlock your phones nor provide you with the information, but they cannot legally sue their customers for unlocking them according to Federal rules.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    12. Re:Calling all Lawyers by arminw · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. If anything, Apple will sell more iPhones because of this hack. Any non-ATT providers would also have to modify their network in order to allow the voicemail to work correctly. The user selected voicemail ordering is one of the key features of the iPhone. It is not likely that any provider will go to the trouble of modifying their network in order to accommodate a few hacked phones. I think Apple can use their expensive lawyers for better purposes. Apple can also come out with a software "update" that totally bricks hacked iPhones. No more updates from Apple for any hacked phone. This is a nice geek headline, just as the ostensible OSX vulnerabilities, but in the real world it amounts to nothing.

      --
      All theory is gray
    13. Re:Calling all Lawyers by StubNewellsFarm · · Score: 1

      According to the AP (via the Pittsburgh Post Gazette), the DMCA specifically allows cell-phone unlocking.

      The amazing thing is that the Post-Gazette somehow considered this important enough to put on the front page today! Maybe Apple's a bit annoyed that this happened, but I bet Jobs is thrilled with the publicity.

    14. Re:Calling all Lawyers by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      As it turns out, the DMCA has an exception for this (unlocking phones), so it's not illegal after all.

      However, it is a reasonable assumption that, since it is a specifically called out exception, it would normally be covered by the law.

      Once again, just because something is law doesn't mean the law is right.

    15. Re:Calling all Lawyers by adolf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dear brainwashed fuckwad,

      Here in the United States, everything is legal unless otherwise specified.

      The DMCA, like most other laws, is not so much a list of permissible actions, but a list of restrictions on freedom.

      The mere absense of legal verbiage forbidding an action is, in fact, a statement that such action is legal, by simple virtue of it not being made illegal.

      But whatever the case: Making an iPhone talk to a non-AT&T network does not raise a copyright issue, so therefore copyright law does not apply, and no exception in the DMCA is required. It could have been a contract issue if Apple had made such a contract a condition of sale, but they do not.

      So, as one's own property, one should do whatever one wishes with it in the absense of prior restraint.

      In case you're still fucking brainwashed, I offer the following rhetorical question: Earlier today I used a 16" pry bar as a cold chisel to break up concrete. This is obviously not the tool's intended use, and I really should have used a cold chisel instead. Since the DMCA doesn't explicitly exclude gross repurposing of pry bars, does this make such usage illegal? (No, of course not.)

      Rights cannot be granted, they can only be taken away.

    16. Re:Calling all Lawyers by Robocoastie · · Score: 1

      "Simply purchasing an iPhone does not convey complete ownership and the right to dismantle protections under such law" Brainwashed into little fascists clearly. Not name calling either, it's a specific word with a specific definition. Modern day fascism is leaning more toward cow-towing to big industry more than ever before.

    17. Re:Calling all Lawyers by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you said, but it doesn't stop the government from being a fucker. You're mistaking my position.

    18. Re:Calling all Lawyers by adolf · · Score: 1

      You're mistaken; I see your position plainly.

      But who gives a fuck if people agree with a law, or whether it is "right" or not, if the law doesn't even bloody apply to the topic at hand?

      At least you admit to being brainwashed, fuckwad.

      Cheers.

    19. Re:Calling all Lawyers by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      I for one would rather be brainwashed and happy than "free" and a complete ass.

      And besides, lemmie give you a hint. You catch more flies with sugar than shit. You'll never convince anyone by calling them "fuckwads" and "brainwashed". Unless, of course, your point is NOT to convince anyone, just to point out that you have a different opinion than other people. In which case you really, really need to get a life.

    20. Re:Calling all Lawyers by adolf · · Score: 1

      I'll take that under advisement.

      Meanwhile, please understand that the more complacent and sugary-sweet you are when it comes to essential liberty, the less of it you'll have to enjoy.

  2. More Like.... by phobos13013 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Expect to see endless lawsuits spring up about this. But really, is there ground to stand on against this?

    --
    ...and it should be known by now
    1. Re:More Like.... by monktus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's nothing to stop you unlocking any other phone (in Europe anyway), so I doubt the iPhone will be any different. If anything, if Apple tries to prevent it, I could see the European Commission stepping in.

      --
      Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals... except the weasel."
    2. Re:More Like.... by owlnation · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unlocking a phone isn't illegal. (nor should it be)

      Apple doesn't lose out of this, so I can't see them rushing to redesign the hardware or software.

      The only loser it AT&T. And one can easily argue that if the provided a good connection product, at a competitive price and backed it up with quality service they'd have nothing to worry about.

      But, of course, the only reason for all service providers all over the globe to use lock-ins is because the last thing any phone company offers is any of the above.

      So, yeah, let's hear those world's smallest violins.

    3. Re:More Like.... by chuckymonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I really hope they don't go after that kid. We need more smart people like him around.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    4. Re:More Like.... by GuldKalle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except (AFAIK) you need to have certified you equipment for radio transmission. And since you've physically hacked your phone, my guess is the Apple certification doesn't count anymore.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:More Like.... by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

      I don't know what the Apple-AT&T contract looks like, but I know in Apple's iTunes contracts, the companies for which it provides protected music require Apple to make "corrections" when someone figures out how to break the protection on the songs.

      If the iPhone contract is similar, then Apple may be required to update the iPhone software to attempt to thwart this.

      Just keep your eyes open and see what happens to the two sites making claims. If they come down, Apple got to them.

    6. Re:More Like.... by jcgf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We need more smart people like him around.

      Very true, but I fear the government wants less smart people around.

    7. Re:More Like.... by OmegaBlac · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apple doesn't lose out of this, so I can't see them rushing to redesign the hardware or software.
      Doesn't Apple get a share of revenue from each AT&T contract? I would expect them to respond to this asap.
      http://www.mobile-tech-today.com/story.xhtml?story _title=Analyst__Apple_Gets_Healthy_Share_of_AT_T_C ontracts&story_id=102008J3T13I
      http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/07/19/anal yst_weighs_in_on_apples_rev_share_arrangement_with _att.html
    8. Re:More Like.... by jbarr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doesn't Apple get a share of revenue from each AT&T contract? I would expect them to respond to this asap.

      Sure, they'll probably respond (and I'd wager that they'll wait until AFTER the phone sells on eBay--you know, to ensure some legal technicality ensues due to the sale) but really, if their business model relies (at least partially) on the revenue of another company, then shame on them.
      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    9. Re:More Like.... by reabbotted · · Score: 0

      Really neither AT&T nor Apple lose on the unlocked iPhone. Apple gets to sell more iPhones at $600 a pop and AT&T doesn't lose anything since people who want to do this weren't going to switch to AT&T anyway. I doubt they'll choose to go after this kid since it wouldn't result in anything other than bad publicity.

    10. Re:More Like.... by Shenkerian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why do you say that? It's a perfectly legitimate business model to develop a platform that draws revenue from third-party licenses. The video game industry is an obvious example.

      --
      You tell me how "whilst" differs from "while," and I'll stop calling you a pretentious jackass.
    11. Re:More Like.... by norminator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But do they have more to gain from selling the hardware, or from their cut of the revenue? Estimates of profits on the hardware are anywhere from 23% ($138) to 55% ($329) of the cost of the phones (for the $599 iPhone, not sure about the $499 one). According to your links, Apple gets either $3 per contract ($72 over 2 years) or $11 ($264 over 2 years), depending on whether the AT&T customer is new to AT&T or not.

      Depending on the balance of new customers to old (and 4GB iPhones to 8GB iPhones), Apple may just make more money by letting people buy the phone and use it with any provider, especially considering that the legal fees to try to enforce the locked phone policy would probably wipe out any difference in revenue from lost AT&T customers. That's provided that AT&T doesn't make too much of a stink with Apple about it. In any case, I'm sure the number of people who actually will end up unlocking their phones will be relatively small, so even AT&T doesn't have much to worry about, and Apple can enjoy those few extra sales that they'll get from it.

    12. Re:More Like.... by djupedal · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "We need more smart people like him around."

      Smart?

      You call going on national TV with all the details and a big shit-eating grin plastered on his iFace, smart? "Hey, Mom!! Look at me!! I just pissed off two major north american companies and screwed the warranty on that new phone you bought me!!!"

      There were three others in on this, according to the story so far. Those are the smart ones, but only as long as they keep quiet.

    13. Re:More Like.... by prxp · · Score: 1

      You call going on national TV with all the details and a big shit-eating grin plastered on his iFace, smart? "Hey, Mom!! Look at me!! I just pissed off two major north american companies and screwed the warranty on that new phone you bought me!!! And sold it on eBay for more than 4 grants!!!!"
    14. Re:More Like.... by aclarke · · Score: 1
      Not to mention the fact that outside of the US, as the article summary mentions, can't otherwise use an iPhone. If I was in the US, I'd probably just switch to AT&T as the plan they offer is (IMHO) reasonable. Since I'm in Canada I'm SOL without either Apple offering the iPhone here, or using a cracked version.

      If I buy a cracked version in Canada, it's a win for Apple. The vast majority of people in the US who want an iPhone are just going to switch to AT&T.

    15. Re:More Like.... by DECS · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps you can draw up a Five Year Plan for the video game industry and we can implement it after the Revolution, comrade.

      I'll work on rounding up the proletariat to design games for the People, so we can all play without anyone being trampled under these bourgeois capitalists who build electronics for money and orchestrate evil plots to make their products more attractive through proprietary software.

      --
      ZDNet's George Ou Exposed as Ignorant Microsoft Shill (Zoon!)
      The assault on reason isn't just a political phenomenon. Microsoft has long been developing its own cast of apologists who have eked out full time careers in the field of sputtering out ignorant, unfounded claims with such insistence and volume that the undecided simply have no alternative but to line up and applaud their seemingly convincing rhetoric. Among them is George Ou, who unsurprisingly blogs for CNET's ZDNet branded website.

      Apple iPhone vs the FIC Neo1973 OpenMoko Linux Smartphone
      Frequently compared to Apple's new smartphone, the OpenMoko FIC Neo1973 is described as the free and open software community's alternative to Apple's officially closed iPhone platform. Here's a look at what it really is and how it compares to the iPhone.

    16. Re:More Like.... by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      If he gets sued by the major North American corps., he'll run through that money quickly.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    17. Re:More Like.... by djupedal · · Score: 1

      ...does it mean anything that his blog is already offline...?

    18. Re:More Like.... by prxp · · Score: 1

      that it's got slashdotted?

    19. Re:More Like.... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      it seems to be back up now, probablly just a slashdotting.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    20. Re:More Like.... by toadlife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...relies on ignorance and short sightedness of the unwashed masses... Thats the business plan of just about every large producer of consumer goods.
      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    21. Re:More Like.... by Yaztromo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since I'm in Canada I'm SOL without either Apple offering the iPhone here, or using a cracked version.

      Except that you're still pretty much SOL, as you're stuck with having to sign up with Rogers and pay them an arm and a leg to use the iPhone data services (outside of a suitable WiFi area, at least).

      Or you could choose to sign up with Fido (which is owned by Rogers) but instead charges you a leg and an arm for the same services. And a few other appendages if you want to access Roger's "expanded network".

      iPhone or not, you're still stuck with our crappy, over-expensive Canadian cell service.

      Yaz.

    22. Re:More Like.... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apple salesperson: How are you today? Would you like an iPhone?

      Customer: Sure.

      Apple salesperson: We'll get you signed up with AT&T.

      Customer: No.

      Apple salesperson: Is the only service that would work.

      Customer: Saids who?

      Apple salesperson: Steve Jobs.

      Customer: My 13 year old neighbor said his iPhone works with hotdog phone service.

      Apple salesperson: The warranty may be nulled.

      Customer: Saids who?

      Apple salesperson: Steve Jobs.

    23. Re:More Like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, he's just the right age to draft him in the military and send him to Iraq.

    24. Re:More Like.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " If I was in the US, I'd probably just switch to AT&T as the plan they offer is (IMHO) reasonable. "

      I think it is reasonable too, however, they don't have a 'business' unit they can sell yet...I run my cell phone through my own company, and write it all off. It looks much better to have it handled through the official 'business' dept of the company. I'm not sure why they aren't addressing this issue quickly....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    25. Re:More Like.... by jcgf · · Score: 2, Informative

      The truth ain't flamebait assholes.

    26. Re:More Like.... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Good to know that, no matter how much we may hate AT&T and T-Mo in the US, Rogers still sucks more.

      Interestingly enough I'm posting this from Canada.

    27. Re:More Like.... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what planet you live on, but only a very small percentage of consumer goods are specifically designed to only work with other products so they can extract a fee from the other consumer goods products. The only ones that come to mind are game consoles, cell phones, some software packages, and cable/satallite services. You don't live in a basement with only game console (not plugged into a tv) and a cell phone do you?

    28. Re:More Like.... by EdelFactor19 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      because lord knows the iPhone is so important to business that not only do you need one, you need your company to buy it for you and pay for it.

      So basically what you are complaining about is that they won't help circumvent tax laws so you can basically get the phone for free cheap schmuck..

      Here's a better idea figure out how you are going to explain to your tax auditor how the iPhone is a warranted business expense... I suppose next you are going to have "your" company buy you a ferrari too and claim that as a business expense because you needed a car... unless you've already done that.

      Honestly you own a business, if you want the iPhone so badly just pay for it for yourself

      --
      "Jazz isn't dead, it just smells funny" ~Frank Zappa
      EdelFactor
    29. Re:More Like.... by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 1

      Apple may just make more money by letting people buy the phone and use it with any provider. . .
      If this were true, why would Apple have tied themselves to AT&T in the first place?

      --
      This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
    30. Re:More Like.... by morcego · · Score: 1

      But, of course, the only reason for all service providers all over the globe to use lock-ins is because the last thing any phone company offers is any of the above.


      This brings up an interesting history.

      Here in Brazil, the cel operators are using "unlocked phones!" was a marketing strategy. Of course, they had a little "help" from the consumer rights organizations.

      And, guess what ? The ones that first jumped the "unlocked phones" bandwagon stone a good number of clients from the others.

      --
      morcego
    31. Re:More Like.... by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You call going on national TV with all the details and a big shit-eating grin plastered on his iFace, smart? "Hey, Mom!! Look at me!! I just pissed off two major north american companies and screwed the warranty on that new phone you bought me!!!"

      No, I call it really smart. He did his homework, found the DMCA provision/exemption that allowed him to do EXACTLY what he did, and announced it.... and as neither "pissing off companies" nor "screwing the warranty" is illegal in the US, he just assured himself a future job.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    32. Re:More Like.... by ahoehn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Grammar Nazi says, "Fewer! Anything that can be counted is Fewer! Less is for things that can't be counted, like water. Less water. Fewer smart people."

      Thank you Grammar Nazi.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    33. Re:More Like.... by aclarke · · Score: 1

      And that's why I'm sticking with my hacked-onto-Bell's-network Samsung i500 Palm phone until something comes along that's worth switching for. I can't use SMS or the internet with it, but then again I couldn't afford it up here anyway. I read somewhere recently that data plans are cheaper in Rwanda than in Canada. WTF.

    34. Re:More Like.... by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't sell business iPhones yet because iPhones have to be activated through iTunes and use iTunes to organize. You yourself may have no problem with that, but I can imagine some companies not wanting to put iTunes on their servers (assuming they even can) simply so their employees can use iPhones. It would be risky for business productivity--it would be like having a business phone activate and be organized through MS's Solitare program.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    35. Re:More Like.... by toadlife · · Score: 1

      The statement "relies on ignorance and short sightedness of the unwashed masses" paints a much broader stroke than what you are talking about.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    36. Re:More Like.... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think there's another way that Apple loses in this.

      Despite the exuberance of the dedicated fans, Apple needs to sell to average consumers if they're going to really succeed. It wasn't all the Mac fans buying iPods that made it so successful, it was the millions of regular, normal people who were drawn to a well-designed, innovative product and paying full price for it.

      Retail is tricky though, because you have to keep giving customers what they want if you're going to stay on top. One reason Apple is still a small fraction of the personal computer market is not just the price, and now that you can run windows on them, it's not the compatibility with software. It's because a huge number of potential customers who would jump to run OSX want to be able to do it on their own sweet hardware. Most of us who deal with digital products as objects instead of a defining "way of life" expect to be able to buy a product "our way" and not be limited by the will of the vendor. There was a time when if you wanted to buy a Jaguar, you would go to some "car boutique" and have some snotty salesman tell you that you could either take the colors they offered or stuff it. There were no such thing as "options". If you squawked about the fact that you needed a complete tuneup every 1000 miles, you were told that "maybe a Jag isn't for you". Eventually, the Jaguar brand went in the tank because they just weren't giving customers what they want and their attitude led to horrible quality control. Now, you go to a Jag dealership and they'll give you choices. They started making the cars better, more reliable, because that's what people want.

      Now Apple's got a lot of company when it comes to not giving consumers what they really want. In fact, it's all the rage now in certain industries, like telecom. "Screw the consumer," they say. "Where are they gonna go"?

      But the consumer is more powerful than we've been led to believe. Eventually, we'll get what we want from Apple or their stock won't continue to stay so overvalued. Or, virtualization will get so flexible that there will be usable hacks for running OSX on our own hardware. Then, you'll see Apple offering "OSX Your Way" like it was some brilliant brainstorm.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    37. Re:More Like.... by Televiper2000 · · Score: 1

      Probably because the first couple years of iPhone will be a generally limited release as the work out the bugs and get their manufacturing ramped up. Giving an exclusive contract to AT&T probably allowed them to negotiate better margins and more cooperation from AT&T's technical side. Basically, they're not selling through other providers because they're not ready to.

      --
      New! Device Legs: These legs will help your poor OEM installed product escape any hamfistedness it may encounter. Ava
    38. Re:More Like.... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Cell Phone unlocking is a DMCA Exemption that the Library of Congress imposed sometime last year. No lawsuits are going to be coming. Maybe threats of lawsuits, but no actual lawsuits.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    39. Re:More Like.... by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I am from his school. He is smart, but really shortsighted in his decisionmaking. He has a 2.0 GPA, and all of his grades were A's or F's. Needless to say he did not graduate. But he is really, really, talented.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    40. Re:More Like.... by trytoguess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They don't want socially savvy people. Those are the folks that can manipulate people to do their biddings. A computer geek? They'll just build/fix shit for those who have above average social skills. He's most welcome in any government. Yes I'm perpetuating the stereotype geeks are antisocial, just noting book smarts doesn't necessarily mean scared government.

    41. Re:More Like.... by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      Eventually, the Jaguar brand went in the tank because they just weren't giving customers what they want and their attitude led to horrible quality control.

      Also, Jaguar now has come out with that ghastly model type that has the toilet seat oval on the grille.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    42. Re:More Like.... by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      Well, the auction has reached $100k now... I wonder if any of those bids are real.

      My bet is that Apple/AT&T will get eBay to take it down next Monday.

    43. Re:More Like.... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Not to call you a liar outright, but there's a problem with your post: his comments on NPR state quite clearly he's going to RIT in the fall. Either you or he is lying. I know his real name, but I don't know yours. Logic dictates he gets a little more trust, so unless you can verify your story somehow, I'm going to have to say it's unlikely you're telling the truth.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    44. Re:More Like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That must be why his blog says he is off to college two days, because he failed to graduate yes? You must not know him quite as well as you think good sir. You sound more like someone trying to cling to his coattails rather than an individual who actually knows him at any level beyond visual recognition. Regardless, your opinion of him is worthless without proof, back up your claims or it is simply gossip.

    45. Re:More Like.... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't sell business iPhones yet because iPhones have to be activated through iTunes and use iTunes to organize.

      I think you have it exactly backwards.

      The reason you still have to use iTunes to activate the phone, is because Apple doesn't sell business iPhones - not the other way around.

      Or do you honestly think that after all the effort that went into developing the phone, the only stumbling block between them and the business market is Apple's inability to invent a way to activate it without using iTunes?

      STEVE JOBS: Dammit people, we've already spent $80 million trying to come up with a non-iTunes iPhone activator, what's the problem?
      DEVELOPER: Sorry Steve, it's just too hard. Maybe next year.
      STEVE JOBS: Ok, fair enough. I only wish I'd listened to that guy Anonymous McCartneyf on Slashdot. I guess we'll shelve our huge plans to launch the iPhone in the business market and focus on something more realistic, like a time machine.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    46. Re:More Like.... by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The truth ain't flamebait assholes. Sorry, that's not the truth.

      The United States Federal Government lives and dies by smart people. It's the smart people in the government that keep the planes flying, the nuclear weapons from blowing up in our faces, the law making halfway descent sense, and who translate the will of the elected charismatics into something mostly practical.

      What the government doesn't want is smart rebels. Something entirely different from the larger subset of "smart people."
    47. Re:More Like.... by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      Heil Webster!

    48. Re:More Like.... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you can draw up a Five Year Plan for the video game industry and we can implement it after the Revolution, comrade.

      To be fair, Tetris was one of the best selling games of all time and was written by someone living under communism.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    49. Re:More Like.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      that is where the problem lies. AT&T brought cingular's mess with them. Really bad coverage most places, world renowned bad customer service and terms that bite you at every turn, make a change to your account they sneak in a contract extension. Notice that? it will take you at LEAST 5 hours on the phone to get it undone and they will do everything in their power to make you want to "just leave it there". Oh and their last software push that I had to undo by reflashing my phone makes the phone favor AT&T cell sites over any other even when the AT&T site is barely received, if it can kind of hear an AT&T tower it switches away from the full strength 3rd party tower right away.

      Worlds worst service, Cell sites designed to not allow calls to drop so they can claim they do not drop calls, nasty CSR's, worlds worst terms of service.

      Yeah, no wonder people are trying to free the iPhone from AT&T service.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    50. Re:More Like.... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      apple doesn't care. They've already made the sale. If anything, this will only bring more customers.

    51. Re:More Like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am a parent (and sometimes instructor) at the school in question, and know *both* posters.

      George did graduate, but did not attend graduation ceremony. Or was asked not to.....

      Watson *is* a student at BA, and is also a sharp cat, and they *do* know each other.

      And BA has more collective brains than a very large (though not complete) subset of
      the Slashdot crowd put together. Top minds. We have freshmen that can compete against
      our PhD teachers (yes, our school has about 70% faculty with PhD).

      So unlike many of the total losers that post here on Slashdot, that talk and talk
      and complain, and dream narrowly of some level of excellence but accomplish
      NIL, our kids are very top flight performers that will go on to real technical
      and other world-class work.

      But of course, this is probably a Foreign Notion to most whining, complaining,
      wannabe tech types here on Slashdot.

      Go, George, Go!

      And Watson, get your act together and put those brains to real work!

    52. Re:More Like.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "So basically what you are complaining about is that they won't help circumvent tax laws so you can basically get the phone for free cheap schmuck.. Here's a better idea figure out how you are going to explain to your tax auditor how the iPhone is a warranted business expense... I suppose next you are going to have "your" company buy you a ferrari too and claim that as a business expense because you needed a car... unless you've already done that."

      I'm not doing anything wrong....geez, writing off business expenses IS part of doing business. A business phone IS part of that. Nothing says you can't get something nice. Nothing in the law says it has to be utilitarian.

      I write off everything legal that I can for the business....mileage, % of my house that is my home office (that is % of rent and utilities), hardware...ISP connection...all things allowed. To not do so is defeating one of the reasons for incorporating. I also have an S corp...which legally allows me to only have to pay SE taxes (FICA, medicare) on the part I pay myself as salary...not everything I bring in....would you say I'm doing something wrong?

      I don't get that your complaining about following the tax laws and taking every advantage afforded to you...that's what the laws and deductions are there for!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    53. Re:More Like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the consumer is more powerful than we've been led to believe. Eventually, we'll get what we want from Apple or their stock won't continue to stay so overvalued. It couldn't possibly be that their stock is "overvalued" (or "high") because people are getting what they want from them.
    54. Re:More Like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, well, I know all three of the above posters. And, like all true Captains of Industry, I troll slashdot anonymously.

      If you'll excuse me, I have to go attend to the group of supermodels whom I pleasure between insulting people on blogs. Also, how about I'm a star athlete.

      I suggest you all stop wasting your time on some stupid website, and become more like me.

    55. Re:More Like.... by berbo · · Score: 1
      depends. Maybe the OP really did mean 'less', as in

      the government wants people who are not quite so bright as this NJ kid
    56. Re:More Like.... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      It couldn't possibly be that their stock is "overvalued" (or "high") because people are getting what they want from them.
      No, it could not.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    57. Re:More Like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like somebody ran out of warranty and... uh, wait, a $2000 iPhone, unlocked but no warranty?

      HOW SMART!

  3. Not just in lots of 500. by pjcreath · · Score: 2, Informative
    From the summary:

    The company will be selling licenses to the hack, minimum quantity 500, at a price not yet announced.
    iPhoneSimFree will be selling to end-users as well. From their front page:

    Individual per unit licenses will be available starting next week
    1. Re:Not just in lots of 500. by RDW · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many days they'll get away with selling this before (a) lawyers find a reason to shut them down, or (b) someone in the hacking community is motivated by this proof of concept to complete a free hack, or (c) someone reverse-engineers the existing hack and releases a free version..? (will iPhoneSimFree be cheeky enough to 'prohibit' reverse engineering _their_ reverse engineering in the license?)

    2. Re:Not just in lots of 500. by arivanov · · Score: 1

      In the USA in theory as much as they like. AFAIK unlocking phones and supplying tools for that is a legal business activity in the USA. In practice with the iPhone it will be the first time an unlock business meets a top-to-bottom PKI which can be claimed to be a measure to protect copyright including content. I will be extremely surprised if Apple has not designed it deliberately to allow the use of DMCA to override the legality of phone unlocking. It will be interesting to watch this one.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:Not just in lots of 500. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many days they'll get away with selling this before (a) lawyers find a reason to shut them down, or (b) someone in the hacking community is motivated by this proof of concept to complete a free hack, or (c) someone reverse-engineers the existing hack and releases a free version..?

      The fact they haven't started selling licenses/software right now says to me they're waiting for AT&T to respond before they start selling. Either with 1) a lawsuit to stop them or 2) an offer to buy the project for some obscene amount of money so they can bury it.
    4. Re:Not just in lots of 500. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Apple cannot misuse the DMCA that way, even if it was access to copyrighted content, and not hardware, that Apple was protecting. The US copyright office has explicitly made phone locking legal, overriding any aspect of the DMCA that could be tortured into such a role.

      All of this crap about lawsuits can stop now. Apple cannot do anything other than implement more technical measures to lock the phone. If it throws lawyers at the problem, it will lose the suit.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Not just in lots of 500. by hob42 · · Score: 1

      If it throws lawyers at the problem, it will lose the suit.

      Not that this has ever stopped Apple (or most any other company, for that matter) in the past.

  4. Implications by imstanny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    AT&T might have a basis for a lawsuit, since it has a contract with Apple for exclusivity. For users with modified iPhones, I speculate the only negative externality will be a voided warranty.

    1. Re:Implications by adam613 · · Score: 4, Informative

      AT&T most likely has a basis for a lawsuit, but that basis has nothing to do with the Apple-exclusivity contract, since people who hack the phone aren't parties to that contract. The lawsuit would more likely be based on violation of license terms prohibiting the defeat of whatever protection mechanisms are keeping the iPhone locked. And I have no idea whether this would hold up in Europe, where this hack is actually useful.

    2. Re:Implications by jbarr · · Score: 1

      AT&T most likely has a basis for a lawsuit, but that basis has nothing to do with the Apple-exclusivity contract, since people who hack the phone aren't parties to that contract.
      But wouldn't the purchaser be bound by some sort of EULA? Consider DirecTV a number of years back who, despite the end-user purchasing the hardware, owned the access cards. That was eventually stated on the box the end-user purchased. I haven't seen the iPhone packaging, but I presume there is some reference that the purchaser is bound by some EULA.

      Obviously, grey/black market iPhones wouldn't fall into this category, but for someone who wants to purchase a "legit" iPhone, this could be an issue.
      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    3. Re:Implications by fm6 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Everybody in this thread with a law degree, raise their hand. Anyone? No? Then go argue about something relatively simple, like quantum mechanics.

    4. Re:Implications by djupedal · · Score: 1

      "the only negative externality will be"

      externality
      noun ( pl. -ties)
      1. 'Economics' ...a side effect or consequence of an industrial or commercial activity that affects other parties without this being reflected in the cost of the goods or services involved, such as the pollination of surrounding crops by bees kept for honey.

      Side-effect...sure. 'Affecting other parties while not reflected in the service'...uuummm - hold on. If you pay me to geld your phone, as a side-effect, Apple (other parties, not the owner) no longer has to honor the warranty. As for that not being reflected in the cost of the service - seems to be directly reflected, since the owner paid for you to take Apple off the warranty hook as part of the package - like it, want it, need it or not.

    5. Re:Implications by bn557 · · Score: 1

      Quantum Mechanics vs Law.... Only one of them makes sense in the real world, and it isn't law.....

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
    6. Re:Implications by gemada · · Score: 1

      Unlocking handsets is allowed under the DMCA. http://www.mobiletracker.net/archives/2006/11/27/u nlock-dmca

    7. Re:Implications by Double_Dark · · Score: 1
      In the US circumvention of the firmware to be able to connect to a different network is entirely legal. From http://www.copyright.gov/1201/

      5. Computer programs in the form of firmware that enable wireless telephone handsets to connect to a wireless telephone communication network, when circumvention is accomplished for the sole purpose of lawfully connecting to a wireless telephone communication network.
  5. Why do all this... by downix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When there are good projects like the Neo that are on their way?

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    1. Re:Why do all this... by sokoban · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because there are good projects like the iPhone already here.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    2. Re:Why do all this... by *weasel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the Neo is a project and lots of people just want a product?

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    3. Re:Why do all this... by xgr3gx · · Score: 2

      Indeed...2 words for you. 1) Neo1978 2)OpenMoko
      I think the first production run of the neo and openmoko is due out in October/November.
      I'm getting ready...it's gonna be schweet!

      --
      Shameless plug alert: Game server control panel
    4. Re:Why do all this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We choose to do these things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.

    5. Re:Why do all this... by Laebshade · · Score: 1

      The iPhone has a bigger hard drive, for one.

    6. Re:Why do all this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that the openmoko will sell, what, tens of copies? Exclusively to geeks. iPhone has mass market appeal and will only get stronger with this news.

    7. Re:Why do all this... by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      A previous slashdot article claimed that the development units were sold out due to unexpected demand.

      Anyone have any idea how many development units were made? That would at least give us a lower limit on the demand for such a device.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    8. Re:Why do all this... by charlieman · · Score: 1

      And what about the Nokia E70?

    9. Re:Why do all this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Neo has the flexibility to kick the living shit out of the iPhone because it can be customized to fit a particular business or person's needs. Imagine it being seamlessly integrated into a company's VOIP system via their wireless routers + vpn when the employee is in one of the company's buildings (sip functionality and a cisco VPN client are all that would need to be ported to the platform). When the employee leaves the building, the phone would behave like a regular cell phone. The GPS abilities would also be of interest to business.

      Apple has seriously fucked up by 1) choosing At&t, a provider with a sub-par network, and 2) focusing on the consumer, not business market with the iPhone. They have made it nothing more than an expensive toy and status symbol for the rich.

    10. Re:Why do all this... by profplump · · Score: 1

      And we all know you can never make money selling expensive toys or status symbols to the rich.

    11. Re:Why do all this... by legirons · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Because there are good projects like the iPhone already here."

      STFU - iPhone represents the most proprietary item you can obtain, with a hardware supplier who's not letting anyone but them write software, a software supplier who's famous for not running on any hardware other than that which they created (software supplier and hardware supplier being the same company, for anyone interested in vendor lock-in), and doing an exclusive deal with a monopoly telephone provider, just to put the monopilistic cherry on the proprietary icing.

      How the fuck can you compare *that* with OpenMoko, a completely Free phone with a Free firmware, Free Operating System, Free applications, and community of Free Software guys prepared to spend $450 each just to debug the hardware for the benefit of humanity, so that for the first time ever, you can buy a phone that does whatever you want

    12. Re:Why do all this... by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Neo is neat and all, but you don't even have to be that open to do better than the iPhone.

      The iPhone is explicitly designed to create vendor lock-in with AT&T. If you want a fully functional smartphone that is unlocked by default, you can get something like a Nokia Communicator.

      In fact, there are great stacks of phones (all generally unavailable from carriers in the US) that are fully functional smart phones that run on industry-standard Symbian (some even on not-fully-open Linux; hell, even Windows Mobile is better than an iPhone) and have such amazing features as being unlocked and supporting 3rd party apps by default.

      Here are some more phones to compare the iPhone to:

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    13. Re:Why do all this... by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Sweet, where can I demo one? When will they be released? What's the battery life? What default apps come with it?

      How the FUCK can you compare a currently selling product with a developer-only platform that still may not see the light of day?

    14. Re:Why do all this... by visualight · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How the FUCK can you be unable to google openmoko and within a few minutes realize that:

      1)You can buy it now if you want.
      2)There's every indication that the retail version(s) will be released on time.
      3)There is a FAQ which answers all of the questions in your original post.

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    15. Re:Why do all this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When there are good projects like the Neo that are on their way?

      Because it's ugly? I'm sure I'll be moderated as Troll for this as the Neo seems to be everyone's favorite phone here but lets face it, the people buying iPhones are not really interested in any technical aspects (besides touchscreen and being able to play mp3s), they buy it primarily for the looks and I doubt they'd be very impressed with the Neo. Do you really think that the normal users (the demographic of iPhone) cares if their phone is open or not?

    16. Re:Why do all this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How the fuck can you compare *that* ...

      Simple. iPhone is shipping.

      More detail. From OpenMoko's public Wiki:

      Currently it is not suitable for users. The state of the software at the moment is pre-alpha. If you order a Neo1973, DO NOT expect to be able to use it as an everyday phone until October 2007 at the soonest, and probably later.
      Emphasis is in the original.
    17. Re:Why do all this... by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      This here is Slashdot. Not anti-Microsoft. Not pro-Apple. It's a site and a community who are into hacking and OSS and other cool stuff.

      We really, really need to say goodbye to some of the 'shiny consumer stuff' nuts who've wandered in here.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    18. Re:Why do all this... by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And "how the FUCK" can you fail to notice that currently it is not suitable for users*their exact words)?

      Yes, I am all for OpenMoko and Free Software, I hope they do a great job. But it is absolutely ridiculous for you ignore the fact that for the average non-technical user, a polished, working product that exists now has a real practical value over something that is still in "pre-alpha" (again, their words) development.

    19. Re:Why do all this... by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      OpenMoko: Write Our Software, Chumps!

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    20. Re:Why do all this... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      What you openmoko people never seem to understand is, much like linux on the desktop, 'free' doesn't mean jack shit to 99.9% of the population. Usability and style and the reliablity of hardware/software tested by hundreds of thousands of people with a price of $600 will beat out your 'free' with no real world usage for $450 any day.

      You want to know 'Why people do all this'. The same reason OSS developers do, because they can. Except they the iphone people started with something good and are making it better, openmoko started with nothing and is hoping to see good before they run out of money to develop the hardware with.

      Stop ranting on about how great 'free' software is. Its a nice concept, but theres a reason it hasn't taken over the world, think about it.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    21. Re:Why do all this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Read about the OpenMoko here.

      "It is a Windows Mobile unit codeveloped by the Chinese government as a mass produced people's phone. It uses a GSM/GPRS module running the proprietary Nucleus OS. In the OpenMoko version, Linux runs the device's phone-related operations like a small handheld computer connected to a GSM phone interface via a serial port."

      So much for that bubble (that OpenMoko is truly "open")

    22. Re:Why do all this... by trawg · · Score: 1

      Stop ranting on about how great 'free' software is. Its a nice concept, but theres a reason it hasn't taken over the world, think about it. I think a lot of it is because open source software (generally) has no marketing. Firefox is a good example of what happens when a few marketing dollars are thrown at an open source project. Let's not forget BitTorrent, too. Open source doesn't suck as much as you think!

      I don't think you're wrong - it's obvious that a lot of solid commercial products kick the shit out of their open source counterparts.

      But most people simply can't even ENVISAGE something like the OpenMoko - they're so completely used to taking it in the ass from massive telcos and getting useless non-portable software on their devices and paying hundreds, if not thousands of dollars every few years because of vendor lock that they can't even imagine an alternative. They just accept it, pay the price, and move on with their lives.

      I hope the OpenMoko comes out, takes off, and kicks ass. I'm tempted to buy one or two for some developer friends to bribe them into working on it. I think if the hardware is solid and it gets a decent hacker following, you'll see awesome applications come out and it'll be a force to be reckoned with.

      But I also hope it comes out so I can perform simple tasks like backing up my mobile contacts and messages without needing to buy a proprietary cable and software package from my telco. So I can install an application to play video without having to pay for it. So I can make an mp3 a ring tone without having to buy it from my telco, or iTunes, or whatever.

      OpenMoko represents freedom of a sort we've never, ever had before. I'll be doing what I can to spread the word about it.
    23. Re:Why do all this... by boarsai · · Score: 1

      I think the thing is... not everyone *cares* about an open source phone? The iphone is as much a fashion accessory as it is a phone... and geeky hip things... well they aren't all that common ;) ZOMG. Don't get me wrong, the OpenMoko looks and sounds interesting but until I've seen one and seen what people actually do with it... until then it's just a picture on the internet to me.

    24. Re:Why do all this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck can you compare *that* with OpenMoko, a completely Free phone with ...

      Ah. If we don't compare, how can we see the differences you point out?

      Thank you, I'll be here all year. Try the zeal.

    25. Re:Why do all this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, OpenMoko sounds great! How well does it blend, though?

    26. Re:Why do all this... by sokoban · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have a 6822 which is like the fore runner of the E70. Nice keyboard.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    27. Re:Why do all this... by visualight · · Score: 1

      NO.

      Look at the whole thread. From the beginning the openmoko is qualified as "on the way". From the first post the iphone (available now) is described as less desirable then the Neo (on the way). The parent to my post countered with the implication that the Neo might not see the light of day (vaporware), my post addressed that specifically.

      To be really really clear: The present availability of the iphone does not compensate for the long long list of defects (defective by design) that come it comes with. Waiting for the Neo, or purchasing the kit now, is such a better option that it is INCOMPARABLE to the iphone.

      OK.

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
  6. Do you smell that? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tt's the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and phew, is it stinkin' up the place!

    1. Re:Do you smell that? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cell phones are not covered under the DMCA. Neither were ink cartridges, but try telling that to Epson.
    2. Re:Do you smell that? by DrinkDr.Pepper · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know about Epson, but Lexmark didn't get away with it.

      --
      0xfeedface
    3. Re:Do you smell that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have to be right to make you fold - only to bankrupt you in the process.

  7. Yeah, but... by Mikachu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but what are you going to do now that you just bought a 2-year contract with AT&T that was required with the purchase of your iPhone?

    1. Re:Yeah, but... by k_187 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given that activation of that contract doesn't occur at the time of sale, but upon activation later. Not much.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    2. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use my money to buy something other than an iphone? if they keep this up they'll be the next Zune

    3. Re:Yeah, but... by Mikachu · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I was under the impression that the price of the phone was subsidized like phones with Verizon and such, even at the $600 price tag. So the price of the phone is only under the condition that you sign the contract with AT&T.

      Am I wrong?

    4. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, yes, you are. The iPhone is not subsidized in any way. You buy the phone and then activate it later, including setting up a plan, at your own home using iTunes. In fact, if you fail the credit check on the iTunes music store, you can use iPhone on a pay as you go plan.

    5. Re:Yeah, but... by k_187 · · Score: 1

      Yes and no, from what I've gathered, the traditional subsidy that would go to you, goes to apple. I don't know what legal rammifications there are to skipping activation on AT&T's network, but it doesn't happen at the point of sale.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    6. Re:Yeah, but... by TrentC · · Score: 1

      but what are you going to do now that you just bought a 2-year contract with AT&T that was required with the purchase of your iPhone?

      A contract is not required to complete the purchase.

      One of my co-workers bought an iPhone and is using it month-to-month on AT&T. No trickery or hackery involved.

    7. Re:Yeah, but... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Yes and no, from what I've gathered, the traditional subsidy that would go to you, goes to apple.
      Uh, I didn't get a check the last time I bought a cell phone with a contract. Was I cheated?
    8. Re:Yeah, but... by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

      Yes and no, from what I've gathered, the traditional subsidy that would go to you, goes to apple. Uh, I didn't get a check the last time I bought a cell phone with a contract. Was I cheated? I didn't get a check, but I did only pay $29 for a phone that cost a lot more than $29 for Samsung to build. In the case of my first cell phone, I really did get a check--I purchased the phone at full price and received a rebate from my carrier that covered the cost of the phone.
    9. Re:Yeah, but... by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      A lot of people want to split hairs in regards to what "subsidizing" really means and whether it applies to the iPhone. They like to make a lot of hay about how the iPhone's initial price tag is more than the cost to manufacture the phone, but really all that proves is that Apple has a hefty profit margin. Rest assured, just like every other phone sold with a contract, a portion of your monthly bill is allocated to pay for the phone and ends up in Apple's pocket.

      On your other point, you can indeed walk out of a Apple store with an iPhone without signing up for a contract with AT&T. However it's dead until you activate it and activation is supposed to require you to sign up for the 2-year contract. There are a few hacks around that, apparently. My estimation is that if any of this actually catches on, they'll soon make it so you have to sign up for the contract in store.

    10. Re:Yeah, but... by CrazySpence · · Score: 1

      No, that won't happen, at least not at the apple stores. The worst you get from apple is if you have any issues with the phone and try to call for support we'll just send you on your way with a nice "too bad, no warranty" because the phone support is linked to your AT&T contract and I would suggest highly that you do not void this warranty as it is a brand spanking new product only 2 months out of the gates. You **might** be able to trick an agent into phone support but if the phone ever needed to be sent in the depot would flag it as warranty void and you'd be paying hefty repair fees.

    11. Re:Yeah, but... by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Not at the moment, but I'm saying that if this really catches on and a lot of people end up buying the iPhone without the contract (and it should be pretty easy to count the number of sales vs. activations), they'll change their standard operating procedure to make you to sign the contract in store. AT&T has some standard paperwork that they give to authorized resellers for new customers to sign. Apple might not like the "experience" of signing paper (how 20th century!), but I doubt either company likes "losing money" very much.

      Moral of the story: if you want to get an unlocked iPhone without a contract, get one now before they close the loophole.

    12. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if I already activated it over 60 days ago? Should I be punished just because I didn't have the clairvoyance to predict that the iPhone would be freed from AT&T? Should others be rewarded for being more patient (or impatient, if the iPhone is not available where they live) and/or smarter than me? Why does life have to be so hard for someone like me, who has to buy things NOW, regardless of my long term interests? I think government and/or industry should be protecting me from myself, and I will elect anyone who promises to do that. Thanks.

      Go iPhone, and all you iPirates can rot in hell!

  8. Meh by El+Lobo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bah, It's not like he made it's battery replaceable.

    --
    It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!!
  9. Thinks a lot of himself.. by x_MeRLiN_x · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'm not trying to belittle his achievement, but I think the fact that geohot autographed the phone with a marker pen can only detract from the value. After distributing instructions to do this yourself and acknowledging that similar auction lots are likely to appear before the end of his, he obviously believes that he's selling a part of iPhone of history. Odd.

    1. Re:Thinks a lot of himself.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "he obviously believes that he's sellng a part of iPhone history."

      Well, considering the bidding is currently at around $3000, he's not the only one that thinks that.

    2. Re:Thinks a lot of himself.. by everphilski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, seeing as the autographed phone has 23 bids and is going for in excess of 3,000, I guess I'd find your statement a little odd.

    3. Re:Thinks a lot of himself.. by simdan · · Score: 1

      How much of that is because it is an unlocked iPhone rather than it has his autograph?

    4. Re:Thinks a lot of himself.. by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Exactly. No one is considering his autograph to be a devaluation of the product.

    5. Re:Thinks a lot of himself.. by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that any number of those bids (perhaps even all of them?) couldn't possibly be fake bids?

    6. Re:Thinks a lot of himself.. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to belittle his achievement, but I think the fact that geohot autographed the phone with a marker pen can only detract from the value. Tell me about it! I caught this homerun ball at a game once, and this jerk pro player had to come and ruin it by writing his name on it! The narcissistic asshole! You can get all the pro balls you want, let me mine intact! :'(
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    7. Re:Thinks a lot of himself.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, I thought that too...

      But someone is already bidding nearly $18,000 for it.

    8. Re:Thinks a lot of himself.. by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      I caught a homerun ball once, too. Then, before the pro player could sign it, some kid who thought he was cool signed it instead.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    9. Re:Thinks a lot of himself.. by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe, we will never know: the man decided to back out and trade his iPhone for a fancy car and 3 new iPhones. Either way, he made 30k + 3 iPhones.

  10. Limited in its usefulness.... by tgatliff · · Score: 3, Informative

    Its great to know that they have figured out the JTag interface, but I question how useful any of this is. Meaning, even if you can make/take calls on all the networks, the visual voicemail and SMS would still be non functioning due to software needed on the AT&T network. The SMS probably can be easily fixed by using a different application, but the visual voicemail would definitely be more difficult to get around.

    1. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you mean they will have to resort to making a call to get their messages?

    2. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would just use Conditional forwarding to forward my unanswered calls to my Asterisk server. Then my voicemail could be delivered via email.

    3. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by tgatliff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would not think that "patching" their visual voicemail app to be that difficult. I do not know how it stores its values, but I suspect that if you spent a couple of hours one could easily figure out its structure, you could probably just put an app that talks to a secondary app on the Asterisk server and pushes the data into the application. I dont have an iPhone, though, so it wont be me doing the work.

      Also, in my opinion, anyone who honestly believes that a 17 yr "figured out" the iPhone JTag interface is nieve. I admit that someone that young is ideal for releasing the data because it is very unlikely that AT&T will go after a kid...

    4. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      I am really sick of hearing this same, lame, usless comment. Who cares about visual voicemail? My cell plan doesnt even INCLUDE voicemail, and I have a Windows Mobile 2006 smartphone.

      Not everyone even cares about voicemail on their cell, let alone the visual kind. The iPhone has MUCH more going for it than that lame feature.

    5. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by Egdiroh · · Score: 1

      the visual voicemail and SMS would still be non functioning due to software needed on the AT&T network.
      The engadget article says that SMS works.

      I think you are confusing the special way the phone shows the SMS messages stored on it, with a special network feature. If not and I am wrong, can you please give me a link to where you read about the SMS stuff? Thanks!
    6. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      If you want to switch from AT&T to another carrier and you have a really expensive iPhone, a working phone with a few of the fancier features nonfunctional is still more useful than a phone that won't work on the other network at all.
      There is still voicemail--it just reverts to normal non-visual voicemail. There is still SMS--and on a phone which can use outright e-mail, why do you need SMS?

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    7. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a T-Mobile (one of the major GSM competitors that someone with an unlocked iPhone might use) customer, I definitely care.

      Voicemail is really my only complaint with T-Mobile. There's many minor problems with their implementation, but the major problem is that it ignores key presses while listening to messages. This means that you have to listen to the whole message (and the slowly-spoken menu after the message) before it will allow you to delete or save the message. So even if you know you don't need to hear the rest of the message, you have to listen to it anyways. Honestly, it seems like the design of the system is not to be usable but to instead maximize the number of minutes you must use to check your messages.

      I'm only still with T-Mobile because I won't give even a single penny to the companies responsible for the broadband debacle in this country. As such, I'll wait for the iPhone to become non-exclusive before I even consider it.

    8. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      As someone who uses T-mobile voicemail every day... wrong. I can hit 7 to delete a message the moment it starts playing, and immediately, "Message deleted. Next message..."

    9. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Callwave already gives me a service that for my needs, is better than the AT&T/iPhone visual voicemail. Speech-to-text on voicemails, with SMS or email delivery, and playback of voicemails from a link in the email.

      The only thing lacking from iPhone now is working, standard IMAP IDLE push email (i.e. not a half-working proprietary thing with Yahoo).

      As soon as somebody releases a working Chattermail-like app for iPhone, or Apple fixes their built in mail app to not suck balls, I'll switch over. For now, I can't give up my Treo's email capabilities to go back in time to the days when you had to press "Check Mail" to get your new messages or wait for every-fifteen-minute updates.

    10. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by dlim · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you don't mind getting a new phone number, you could use a free service like GrandCentral. It gives you a single phone number that routes calls to your phones based on the caller and your rules, and lets you access all of your voicemail visually from the web. The website uses a flash plugin, but there's a mobile version. I don't have an iPhone, so I can't confirm if it works on mobile Safari.

      I'm sure it requires more effort than the built in solution, but it doesn't care who your phone company is.

    11. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Google-Troll

    12. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by SuperMog2002 · · Score: 1

      You're right. The SMS messaging on the iPhone is just a nice UI on top of plain old text messaging. The voice mail is a different story, as it actively interacts with the network.

      --
      Sunwalker Dezco for Warchief in 2016
    13. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by SuperMog2002 · · Score: 1

      There is still SMS--and on a phone which can use outright e-mail, why do you need SMS?
      Because most of my friends don't have phones that have full email support, and SMS is often a lot more effective than calling for short messages or for sending phone numbers and the like.
      --
      Sunwalker Dezco for Warchief in 2016
    14. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by aberkman · · Score: 1

      If you think this is not useful, perhaps you should look at some of the other cool stuff these hackers have been working on at #iphone (on IRC). One example is this: http://www.irseek.com/show.php?pageid=e7903c3c4bdb 11dca0ac23484eccdbf5&hilite=iphone%20hack%20tmobil e

    15. Re:Limited in its usefulness.... by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      sms works just fine. visual voicemail - oh well. I never use voicemail (disable it) anyway.

  11. Current cell phone DMCA exemption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The DMCA currently has an explicit exemption surrounding cellular phones locked to a specific provider (at least until November 2009). For more, see Ars Technica or Freedom To Tinker.

    There may be other legal avenues they can pursue, but DMCA appears to be out of the running.

  12. Apple and AT&T won't care by llZENll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple and AT&T have undoubtably already discussed what they would do if this happened, as it undoubtably would, Apple will probably have to pay a fine to AT&T as per contract, or attempt to fix the issue. Most likely though neither side will care much as the majority of users will simply switch to AT&T rather than trying to install an unlocking utility, as this is Apple's whole mantra and reason people buy Apple products, they would much rather pay for convienence and an easy to use device than having to hack, adjust, and tweak it.

    1. Re:Apple and AT&T won't care by frostycellnex · · Score: 1

      The thing is, at least in the iPhoneSIMfree case, they're intending to sell the hack in increments of 500 licenses to providers rather than end-users. The buyers' intent, it can be presumed, is to sell end-users iPhones that have already been hacked rather than leaving them to do it themselves. That would be very attractive in Europe, and potentially to a niche market here in the states who have had a bad experience with AT&T (probably not an insignificant number. AT&T is the one that stands to lose here, since Apple will presumably already have gotten their margin out of the hardware purchase.

    2. Re:Apple and AT&T won't care by infestedsenses · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the engadget article mentioned in the summary:

      The unlock process took only a couple of minutes. From our end it was totally painless.

      Remember it's a simple software patch. That doesn't sound like much inconvenience. Put a nice, simple UI on it and there's nothing left preventing the "simple folk" from "hacking" their iPhones.

      Actually, from what I understand, AT&T themselves did a terrible job at activating iPhones during the launch. Still no problems selling, apparently.

    3. Re:Apple and AT&T won't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither will care and if they do here's why the shouldn't. It only will happen here and there in terms of mass unlocking. The general American public doesn't have the time or the energy to give a shit. If they did, consumers would have demnaded open-ness with there dollars years ago. Apple most definately doesn't care, at some point in time someone is shelling out $499 or $599 for one. After that the European cellco's shouldn't care as here comes more customers with more data and phone usage. Now what I think what would be the coup de grais [sp], is if T-mobile said, ok, bring your iPhone to use, here's a data plan, go enjoy.

    4. Re:Apple and AT&T won't care by sabinm · · Score: 1

      The problem has never been whether AT&T and Apple have a great service and product. The problem has been that up until now, people have not had the choice to chose another carrier if they wanted the iPhone.

      they would much rather pay

      This clause implies some kind of choice in the matter. Locked phones remove choice. This is not a problem with just the iPhone and AT&T. This is a problem with the entire U.S. cellular service industry. The ability to unlock phones is only the first step. The faster that people unlock their phones, the faster that the cell phone industry will realize that selling *subsidized phones is a dead end.

      *I always chuckle at the phrase subsidized. You can be assured that the cell phone companies aren't paying the cost. You're paying it in higher phonebills and cancellation fees. Almost every phone they claim as subsidized is paid for in the end by a cancellation charge or a guaranteed income stream from a lengthy contract and upsells from locked-in content. The ironic part is the unlocked price is inflated past the price of the penalty fee so sometimes it's cheaper to get the phone, pay the 200 dollar penalty and then remove the restrictions.

      --
      http://cincyboys.blogspot.com/ Everything Cincinnati. Including the word 'Finnih'
  13. Functionality by martinelli · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder how the functionality of the iPhone is affected - visual voicemail, uploading video, etc. Does anyone know if these are AT&T specific functions?

    1. Re:Functionality by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 1

      I know this is a groundbreaking concept, but have you tried to maybe RTFA?

    2. Re:Functionality by prxp · · Score: 1

      Everything works fine, with 2 exceptions: 1) Visual voice mail: that's an ATT specific functionality, you won't get it in any other carrier up to the moment. 2) Youtube: In order to work, youtube needs a set of certificates/keys that are generated during the legitimate activation process and nobody could crack that yet. Some folks have posted their own certificates/keys online. You could use then to make your own youtube work. It might get tricky though. Also you might be required to change EDGE setting to your carrier's. The main problem actually is the activation, you still ave to do it. Also, you'll need to re-hack the activation every time you restore your phone. And since all updates will demand a full restoration of hacked phones, that means that every time you update your phone you will be required to hack it again. Let's just hope all hack don't stop working all of a sudden after a possible fix from some Apple update. :)

    3. Re:Functionality by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

      I know this is a groundbreaking concept, but have you tried to maybe RTFA?
      This is Slashdot, you insensitive clod! We don't RTFA around here!
      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    4. Re:Functionality by cbunix23 · · Score: 1

      Where do you think voice mail is stored when the calling party iPhone is not reachable ?

    5. Re:Functionality by cbunix23 · · Score: 1

      ed - s/calling/called/ w q .

  14. Still... by prxp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You still have to go through the activation process. There are tons of methods to bypass it though. Those thinking it's just to unlock the iPhone and get worry free should be aware. If you have a non-ATT iPhone, You'll still need to re-activate it after every software update from Apple. That's because iTunes checks your phone for consistency and hacked phones don't pass this test. iTunes will demand a full restoration of the hacked iPhone that creates the need for re-activation. It's not that difficult to crack the activation process, but if you are not tech savvy you may get into trouble. After every software update, Apple may change things in iPhone's OS which includes the activation process. So all activation hacks may stop working overnight. Of course the iPhone hack community will eventually modify the hacks so they adapt to the changes, but keeping track of all of that might be hard for the technological challenged.

    1. Re:Still... by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      You don't need to ever update your iPhone - if it works, leave it alone. Updates aren't forced on you.

      And if you ever do want an update (e.g. it fixes a bug that bothers you, or it adds new functionality) then reactivating the phone takes a very short amount of time. As TFA explains, most of the time spent for the mod is adding wires - once that's done the rest is a simple download procedure.

    2. Re:Still... by prxp · · Score: 1

      then reactivating the phone takes a very short amount of time. As TFA explains, most of the time spent for the mod is adding wires - once that's done the rest is a simple download procedure. Simple, Yeah right, try telling that to the average joe. And rumor has it that apple is releasing in some near future updates that will extend iPhone's fucntionalities a lot. I mean things like copy and paste. Also, you will get no youtube! You could try to find the certificate files that have been posted online, but it's just a matter of time they get revoked by Apple, since there are tens of thousands using them probably. I mean, who wouldn't revoke a certificate that's supposed to be used by one phone only and shows up like that? I'm not telling people not to do it, I'm just stating the facts so nobody gets deceived by some commercial hack. By the way, I wasn't talking about geohot's hack, my comment was more intended to the commercial guys.

  15. You would think...... by budword · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You would think any company with a goal of making money by out competing it's competitors in the market would take this moment to jump in the air and yell, "Holy bat shit Bat Man, we have a hell of hit on our hands. We've hit a home run ! People are willing to spend 12 hours moding our gear to get it the way they want it. I bet they'll be willing to spend a ton of money on our stuff. This is fantastic. Lets give them what they want ! We are going to be rich !" I don't think that's what they are going to do though, I think they are going to sue some people. Sorta lets you know where they are coming from doesn't it ? They want to compete by locking you in. Sorta like some other large company I can't remember the name of just now.

    1. Re:You would think...... by faloi · · Score: 1

      They want to compete by locking you in. Sorta like some other large company I can't remember the name of just now.

      You're probably thinking of Apple and the way they lock people into using iTunes store on their iPod.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    2. Re:You would think...... by outZider · · Score: 1

      *eyeroll*

      Most people choose the iPod for that. Kinda like how the Zune locks you into the Zune store. You could get a WM player, which allows you access to... a lot of stores with the same pricing and content. *twirls finger* It's all about making it easy.

      Hoser.

      --
      - oZ
      // i am here.
    3. Re:You would think...... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Holy bat shit Bat Man, we have a hell of hit on our hands. We've hit a home run ! People are willing to spend 12 hours moding our gear to get it the way they want it. I bet they'll be willing to spend a ton of money on our stuff. This is fantastic. Lets give them what they want ! Let's fix that for reality, shall we?

      Holy bat shit Bat Man, we have a hell of hit on our hands. We've hit a home run ! People are willing to spend 12 hours moding our gear to get it the way they want it. I bet they'll be willing to spend a ton of money on our stuff. This is fantastic. Lets give them what they want! Let's tear up our contract with AT&T, start selling this thing unlocked, and get rogered with injunctions and lawsuits until our ears bleed! I'm sure AT&T won't mind if we throw out the EXCLUSIVITY CONTRACT that they were touting for the last 8 months!

      Get a clue please.
      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re:You would think...... by budword · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The clue would be that they chose to enter into an exclusive deal with a single carrier in the first place. When you find a clue yourself let me know.

    5. Re:You would think...... by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Except nobody buys a Zune.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    6. Re:You would think...... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      You don't think that perhaps AT&T footed some of the development bill, do you? Or perhaps they needed to have network support for the advanced features at an early stage in order to make it the device it is today; and said network would not go through the trouble without some incentive to do so?

      Pull you head out of your ass.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    7. Re:You would think...... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      You need to use what on who now? I own an iPod and have never used itunes. I guess I'm *just that special*. (sarcasm).

      And I thought you could burn itunes tracks to CD, kinda annoying but not exactly a 100% lockin.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    8. Re:You would think...... by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      In addition to all the other points, the store doesn't even lock you into ipod use now if you buy the drm-free tracks that emi has. Apple has already shown it's willing to sell drmless music, so I think blame rests squarely on the record companies here for any itunes store lock-in. Apple certainly is no saint, but on this point you're wrong

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  16. Not enough for me to plunk down for one. by Hampton_Comes_Alive · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    While this is a cool hack, I'm certainly not ready to plunk down my hard earned cash on one just to unleash it from AT&T, which I am sure would void the warranty should anything bad happen.

    Count me among those individuals not willing to shell out for an iPhone. I can't bring myself to lock in to AT&T for the next two years (at least), and I'm not willing to assume the risk of freeing it and subsequently breaking it (or worse, bricking it WHILE clumsily fumbling around the inside of it).

    Besides, EDGE is so totally yuck!
  17. Licensing a hack? by djcatnip · · Score: 4, Interesting

    how the hell do you license a hack? That's like selling someone the way to snap their fingers.

    --
    I make these: http://beatseqr.com
    1. Re:Licensing a hack? by Nikker · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well I guess the guy found a bunch of people who don't know how to snap their fingers ;)

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    2. Re:Licensing a hack? by setirw · · Score: 1

      For the same reason that it's perfectly legal for my private high school to "sell me the way" to solve second order differential equations, or for my violin teacher to "sell me the way" to play Bach...

      --
      This message printed on 100% post-consumer recycled electrons.
    3. Re:Licensing a hack? by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Indeed...you can sign contracts with each customer saying they're not allowed to disclose the process or else, but once it's inevitably "leaked", it's just out there. You certainly can't set the legal system against some random third party who got the information from a website and is now selling their own hacked iPhones.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    4. Re:Licensing a hack? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      How do you license instructions for a computer?
      Oh, wait, like this: http://opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php
      If you can license code, you can license instructions for humans as well

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    5. Re:Licensing a hack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or your mom selling me her vagina. to use for sex.

    6. Re:Licensing a hack? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      For the same reason that it's perfectly legal for my private high school to "sell me the way" to solve second order differential equations, or for my violin teacher to "sell me the way" to play Bach... The difference being that your private high school doesn't put a limitation on how many differential equations you're allowed to solve or how often you're allowed to play a selection by Bach. This isn't simple teaching. This is something different.
    7. Re:Licensing a hack? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      How do you license instructions for a computer?
        Oh, wait, like this: http://opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php
        If you can license code, you can license instructions for humans as well This doesn't seem to be the same thing. A series of instructions for humans tend to be in the form of some published work - a book, pamphlet, eBook, etc. And just like a computer program, such published works fall under copyright. And just like a computer program, you can allow a customer to make their own copies of that work according to whatever license you want.

      What's different here is that its not a matter of instructions, but iterations of following those instructions. Where do we limit how many times a set of instructions can be followed? I suppose something along the lines of user seat licensing might be comparable in the IT world. But do we have anything that compares for people?

      I can understand the temptation to applying IT rules of so-called IP for humans. But I'm not sure there's any previous precedence that would imply that it is enforceable... or even a generally good idea to try.

      You can write a manual on a particular technique and restrict copying of that manual. However, can you stop someone from learning from that manual and then repeating the method ad nauseum... or teaching the method to others... or even using that knowledge to write and publish their own manual?
    8. Re:Licensing a hack? by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      or your mom selling me her vagina. to use for sex. meh. didn't really make me laugh. now if you had said:

      or your mom selling me her vagina. to use as a blimp hangar. I would have given you a +1, Funny
  18. OpenMoko by Joseph1337 · · Score: 0

    iPhone is just another media blowed idead, created by milions pumped in commercials. OpenMoko is superior to it in many cases: -You freerly choose the operator (lower prices) -Open software and propetiary software without the need for some stupid licenses, resulting in much wider selection (Jobs has a big hunger for money and this stupid idead that you must need a special license to write soft for it is just another of his maniacal ideas) -It`s cheaper by about 100$, with probarly the same features(ofc in the iPhone the cost of AT&T monopoly is not included) -It runs on a open source, free OS with a modified Linux kernel (this should result in good OS maintance, patches, feature extensions, etc.) -It`s free (I mean Open Source, but that is more ideology, however it could result in better code maintance, patches, wider soft selection and security) -And some more

    1. Re:OpenMoko by norminator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It`s cheaper by about 100$, with probarly the same features(ofc in the iPhone the cost of AT&T monopoly is not included) I'm pretty interested in the OpenMoko project myself, but let's be realistic here.

      1) Noone's going to know about it but Slashdot nerds. It may sell alright and be moderately succesful, but nothing like the iPhone.
      2) The Phase 2 version of the phone (the one intended for mass market) will cost $450 for the base model, or $600 for the Advanced (developer's) version. That makes the base model $50 cheaper than the 4GB iPhone, and $150 cheaper than the 8GB iPhone, but there's also much less storage space (256MB + 512MB micro SD card... any other larger mSD cards you have to buy separately), no camera, and at this point, there's no way for the general public to really know how good the software interface is. It also has a smaller screen (but with higher resolution, so that's a plus), with no multi-touch functionality (yet). More pros and cons for the OpenMoko phone vs. the iPhone can be found here.

      I hope the OpenMoko project is a success, and I want one two, but I wouldn't go so far as to say it's an iPhone killer. Come to think of it, good things haven't ever happened for any company that's made a so-called iPod killer, so I wouldn't think OpenMoko should even aspire to be an iPhone killer. Just a good phone/personal portable computer.
  19. Creating the hack may be fine, but... by moracity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    they'll never get away with selling it.

  20. don't care by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Personally, I don't even care about the iPhone until it has GPS. As much as I hate the unresponsive and convoluted interface interface, the clumsy buttons, and the general ugliness of my iPaq, having GPS-enabled google maps in my pocket is now an absolutely mandatory requirement for me to even consider another mobile device.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:don't care by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that GPS on a phone is useful, but at the same time I think an overreliance on technology can be kind of scary. I already know people who are incapable of planning ahead - if they want to get a group of people together for a meal, for example, it involves countless last-minute phone calls and chaos. I imagine that once GPS phones become more pervasive, there will be a new group of people who are incapable of navigation without technology. These will be people who can't or won't read a map ahead of time, and who will be driving around town with half their attention directed towards a 3x5" screen in their hand.

      I'm an irrelevant luddite, I know. :)

    2. Re:don't care by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that GPS on a phone is useful, but at the same time I think an overreliance on technology can be kind of scary. I already know people who are incapable of planning ahead - if they want to get a group of people together for a meal, for example, it involves countless last-minute phone calls and chaos. I imagine that once GPS phones become more pervasive, there will be a new group of people who are incapable of navigation without technology. These will be people who can't or won't read a map ahead of time, and who will be driving around town with half their attention directed towards a 3x5" screen in their hand.

      I'm an irrelevant luddite, I know. :) I would like to see you get along with metalworking technology. Or language technology.

      Adapt or die, my friend. The things you value so much are no longer valuable. Kids these days don't know how to ride horses, either.
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:don't care by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm pretty sure the ability to plan ahead will always be relevant. Sure, less planning may be required for informal get-togethers now that cell phones are pervasive. But kids who grow up not learning to plan anything might get a rude awakening when they enter the business world and start screwing up important schedules.

  21. Will eBay pull the auction? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This seems to be the phone equivalent of a modchipped game console, which eBay has explicitly banned from their site. Given the insane amount of attention this is getting and will continue to get, is it likely that they'll simply pull the auction, possibly after receiving a nastygram from AT&T and/or Apple?

    1. Re:Will eBay pull the auction? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      I think eBay's reasoning behind preventing modchipped consoles from being auctioned is that they're often used to play pirated games. This iPhone hack allows one to use a different operator, which is not illegal AFAIK.

    2. Re:Will eBay pull the auction? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      I think eBay's reasoning behind preventing modchipped consoles from being auctioned is that they're often used to play pirated games. This iPhone hack allows one to use a different operator, which is not illegal AFAIK. Chipped consoles are also used to play backups and homebrew, though, and are not in themselves (AFAIK/IANAL) illegal to own. They are, however, strongly discouraged by the big corporations who make the consoles, and who have aquarium tanks full of lawyers at the ready... as do ATT and Apple.
    3. Re:Will eBay pull the auction? by Svet-Am · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt eBay will pull this auction simply because of the economics. The guy started the auction at $540USD and it's currently sitting at a little over $10kUSD. Just think of the commission that eBay is likely to get through auction start fees, auction close fees, and (likely) PayPal payment fees.

      --
      [move .sig! for great justice, take off every .sig!]
    4. Re:Will eBay pull the auction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check again - it took a little over 2 hours to go from $10k to $100M - that's right $100 million. Apple should just start selling them unlocked one at a time on ebay- talk about profit margin.

    5. Re:Will eBay pull the auction? by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      No. Phone unlocking is specifically allowed under DCMCA or whatever those no-reverse-engineering laws were called.

  22. Hack licenses? by CheeseTroll · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They're selling *licenses* to the hack? And will they send the BSA after someone if they suspect they're under-licensed?

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    1. Re:Hack licenses? by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      And will they send the BSA...

      You mean they will send in the Boy Scouts of America?! *shakes in his boots*
      --
      The game.
    2. Re:Hack licenses? by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. Starting with their shock troops, aka "Eagle Scouts", with their freshly-sharpened talons flashing in the morning sun. Look out!

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  23. Not Illegal by Dusty00 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is actually explicitly legal. In an attempt to defend their lock-in business model the phone company previously tried to prohibit flashing their firmware under the DMCA. They later decided the only purpose to of this was to support a business model and hence they added it to the DMCA exception list.

    DMCA on cell phones

  24. Hehe... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    but the Neo1973 has GPS. And removable storage. And replaceable battery.
    But No camera :-(

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Hehe... by downix · · Score: 1

      Plus, need a hard drive? Why, there's this here USB port, just crying out to plug one into!

      --
      Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    2. Re:Hehe... by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      Having no camera is an advantage. If you can prove your phone has no camera, you can use it in places where cameras are forbidden.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    3. Re:Hehe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like plane during the start... erm, uhm, wait...

    4. Re:Hehe... by muszek · · Score: 1

      I knew it... it's a feature!

    5. Re:Hehe... by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 2, Funny

      Okay, I just had a mental image of carrying around a 300GB USB drive, with external power supply, just to boot my cell phone.

      I'd do it, too. :|

      -:sigma.SB

      --
      WARN
      THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
  25. ET CLone Phone.. by popeye44 · · Score: 1

    Didn't we read this the other day? China is busy cloning the I-phone? http://www.ipodobserver.com/story/32618/ It seems to me Meizu already makes a darn fine alternative to the ipod. I'd like to see this here.

    --
    Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
    1. Re:ET CLone Phone.. by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      No. This is not making imitation iPhones with more features than real ones; this is modifying real iPhones to do what real iPhones can't normally do--namely, work outside AT&T--without gaining any other features.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  26. Interesting to see what will happen by tacokill · · Score: 1

    This is national news now. CNBC is covering it and Apple's stock jumped $3.60 or so because of the news.

    It will be very interesting to see how the players react. My prediction?
    Apple: won't care. more customers = better
    T-Mobile: won't care.
    AT&T: Pissed!

    It is very important to distribute the "how-to" as quickly and widely as possible. I hope he published them before they sue his ass and try to silence him. Because I think AT&T will do exactly that...

    Remember folks, sometimes it doesn't matter if you win or lose -- only that you delay. And AT&T would love to delay people from doing this on a mass-scale.

    1. Re:Interesting to see what will happen by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Queue the DMCA suit in 5 .. 4.. 3.. 2.. 1..

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  27. Certifiable by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

    That's a problem for you as an individual hacker. I suspect it'll be less of a problem for that corp. that did the software hack; they'll just make their own official certification for iPhones hacked with their software.

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    1. Re:Certifiable by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      Apple's legal muscle can probably reach right out and get the FCC to do their bidding. The notably corrupt FCC operation does pretty much whatever rich corporations want it to, ya know.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
  28. physical? by norminator · · Score: 1

    Except (AFAIK) you need to have certified you equipment for radio transmission. And since you've physically hacked your phone, my guess is the Apple certification doesn't count anymore. There's nothing physical (hardware, that is) about this hack, at least not for the iphonesimfree.com hack. And as long as the software doesn't make any modifications to the way the radio behaves (which I would imagine it doesn't), it should be just fine.
    1. Re:physical? by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      The iphonesimfree.com hack is a software hack, but the one that has dominated the news (by a 17 year old Jersey kid), including NPR shows, etc. is a physical hack involving soldering.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    2. Re:physical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Temporary solder hack on an address line. If you do it right (removing the solder with a solder wick at the end), there should be no detectable difference in emissions between a modded phone and a factory phone.

      You want to talk about how to void your warranty in ten seconds, though... this qualifies.

  29. I think by hummassa · · Score: 1

    (I have no time to confirm it)
    that 3000 development units were requested, 1500 of them are already with the buyers, the second 1500-sized lot is coming out next week. I don't think Neo will be a geeks-only thing.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      While these iPhone hackers will be spending their time working around Apple restrictions, these Neo people will have an SDK and full support from the manufacturer. Not to mention a market for their apps. Let the flames begin.

    2. Re:I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      While these iPhone hackers will be spending their time working around Apple restrictions, these Neo people will have an SDK and full support from the manufacturer. Not to mention a market for their apps.

      Followed shortly by bans from the carriers.

    3. Re:I think by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Which carriers?

      AT&T and T-Mobile don't generally ban compatible phones from their networks - in fact, I'm unaware of a single instance in which they've done so, and it would be bad business for them to do so. And in Europe, it would be illegal for an operator to ban the use of a standard GSM phone that's otherwise CE approved.

      (And if you're going to point at the IS-95/CDMA2000 operators, well, no open phone will ever be aimed at that "standard", so it's a non-issue anyway.)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      AT&T and T-Mobile don't generally ban compatible phones from their networks

      They will when the phones start doing malicious things. And as wide-open as that phone is, that's guaranteed to happen.

  30. Except for one small problem by tacokill · · Score: 1

    They might step in but for one small problem: The iPhone isn't available in Europe right now.

    But other than that tiny detail, I agree with your post :)

    1. Re:Except for one small problem by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      buy them in the US, unlock them and export them? I presume the iphone supports the european bands as well as the american ones.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:Except for one small problem by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "buy them in the US, unlock them and export them? I presume the iphone supports the european bands as well as the american ones."

      Heck, what about the US? I'm wondering if the phone is unlocked....there is nothing preventing you from theoretically using it with a T-Mobile account in the US is there?

      Bringing up another question....what if T-Mobile put in infrastructure to support iPhone visual voicemail...and other goodies that AT&T does...if they reversed engineered it in a 'clean' room, could they not get away with it and allow people in the US to switch to T-Mobile if they so wished?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  31. How to connect to PC boards without soldering by Animats · · Score: 1

    Soldering on jumper wires is only for experimenting. If it really can't be done from software alone, what's needed is a a PC board test fixture. Once you have one of those set up for the job, connecting to the right spots is easy. With that, and a control PC programmed to do all the necessary downloads and updates, the whole operation can be done in a minute or two per phone.

    Coming soon to the back room of an off-brand cell phone store near you.

    1. Re:How to connect to PC boards without soldering by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      you'd still have to scrape off the solder mask and you may have problems mounting the board accurately enough (afaict during factory testing and programming boards are usually dealt with as complete panels with the mounting holes for the test fixture being in the parts of the panel that do not become part of any final board).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:How to connect to PC boards without soldering by Televiper2000 · · Score: 1

      I agree. That's assuming the necessary contact points are A) exposed, and B) sufficient for a bed of nails test. Unless you're hacking thousands of these things. It's probably a lot more efficient just to solder the wires on to the board. It's not like it's a significant task for anyone with that kind of experience. It sounds like it's J-Tag so it's only 6 wires.

      --
      New! Device Legs: These legs will help your poor OEM installed product escape any hamfistedness it may encounter. Ava
  32. Good For the Kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have lived 60 years and it is well documented that the only thing ATT does well and with consistency is to F people.

  33. not worth unlocking. by cbuskirk · · Score: 1

    I think it is great the phone has been unlocked. I wish all phones were sold like that. But if I were to buy a iphone today there is no chance I would unlock it because I would lose carrier specific features, specifically Visual (Asynchronous) voice mail.

    1. Re:not worth unlocking. by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      Go without visual voice mail or without a 2 year contract. Hmmm. Tough choice...NOT!

    2. Re:not worth unlocking. by TrentC · · Score: 1

      Go without visual voice mail or without a 2 year contract. Hmmm. Tough choice...NOT!

      I'm really surprised that this isn't discussed more, but you can activate an iPhone without signing up for a 2-year contract. I have a co-worker who did exactly this; he was told how to do it by a sales associate at the store he purchased it from. This is not illegal in any way; AT&T lets you do month-to-month on all of their plans in this manner, if you buy the phone first. Given that the iPhone price is not subsidized by the contract in any way, shape or form, why tie yourself into a contract?

      When you activate the iPhone, enter all 9's for your Social Security number. You'll fail the credit check (duh!) and you will be told you can either go to an AT&T store to talk to a representative or you can go month-to-month.

    3. Re:not worth unlocking. by aldheorte · · Score: 1

      Wait, you have to put in your social security number to activate the phone? Are you serious?

    4. Re:not worth unlocking. by tuxedokamen · · Score: 1

      Any time you open an account with a carrier, they'll do a credit check on you. This is what the SSN is for. If your credit is bad, you can go month to month. All 9s is a fake serial number, so you're gaurenteeing a failed credit check. Bad credit means you can't sign a contract with them, but you can still sign up for the (arguably overpriced) month to month plan.

  34. +1 Moronic Moderation [NT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [NT]

  35. All this for a phone that sucks!? by erroneus · · Score: 0, Troll

    I think a hand-held video player that behaves like the iPhone is a worthy thing to want or have. I think a hand-held multi-media device that does 802.11 wireless access is DEFINITELY a worthy entertainment device to want or have. And yes, I realize the iPhone is all of that "and more."

    But as a phone, it sucks and simply isn't worth the effort or money based on the fact that the user/owner can't change his/her own batteries. I pray the iPhone die a quiet but memorable death.

    -1 troll me if you like, but there are other devices that are better and cheaper and for whatever limited set of features you want, there is probably a better alternative device that does those things better and cheaper. And let's face it... using AT&T's internet, it's SLOW. And I have yet to hear about an unlocked iPhone being used on any other carrier.

  36. CNBC Coverage by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 3, Informative

    The kid got an interview on CNBC. Not quite fifteen minutes of fame but at least a couple. He also managed to get in a plug for "information wants to be free" and to note that what he did is explicitly legal.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
    1. Re:CNBC Coverage by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Hrm, dont see it on YouTube and the usual places yet... Which show did this run during?

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    2. Re:CNBC Coverage by dlenmn · · Score: 1

      The interview is available at

      http://www.cnbc.com/id/20426036/site/14081545/

  37. Bidding History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bid History

    Item title: World's Second Unlocked iPhone (revised)
    Time left: 6 days, 4 hours 1 minute 44 seconds

    Bidder Bid Amount Date of Bid
    RealityDistortionField $3,050.00 Aug-24-07 13:23:11 PDT
    Randall L. Stephenson $3,040.00 Aug-24-07 13:23:05 PDT
    RealityDistortionField $2,850.00 Aug-24-07 13:20:00 PDT
    RealityDistortionField $2,840.00 Aug-24-07 13:00:09 PDT
    Chair-Chucker-1956 $1,430.00 Aug-24-07 12:40:01 PDT
    RealityDistortionField $666.66 Aug-24-07 12:20:09 PDT
    Chair-Chucker-1956 $530.00 Aug-24-07 12:10:21 PDT

  38. Software hack by tholomyes · · Score: 1

    It's worth nothing that the iphonesimfree.com hack is a full SIM hack that works entirely in software, no soldering required. Also, allegedly, the hack stays in place even after a software restore.

    --
    When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
  39. just wait till the hack appears on bit torrent by bennini · · Score: 1

    there is no way this company is going to be able to profit from this hack. there is no way to authenticate, validate or restrict the unlocking process.

    as soon as this thing gets out in the open, there will be no stopping street-corner mobile phone stores from just downloading the hack rather than buying it in these "500 license" bundles.

  40. SIMlock is not legal everywhere by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    Sooner or later, the iPhone will hit Belgium, where SIMlock is illegal. We'll see.

  41. Wrong by ssstraub · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's many minor problems with their implementation, but the major problem is that it ignores key presses while listening to messages.
    I am a longtime T-Mobile customer, and I ALWAYS press 7 to delete my voicemail messages before waiting for them to end. Usually I listen to them long enough to know who it is then delete. I assume their voicemail system is the same nationwide.
  42. Abroad by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    but what are you going to do now that you just bought a 2-year contract with AT&T that was required with the purchase of your iPhone?

    Keep the contract here but use cheap country-local SIM's when traveling abroad?

    Was that a trick question?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  43. Isn't that always how it goes by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    A Free solution, that is hard for an average user to implement, vs. a locked down proprietary solution that is easy to use but will cost you to obtain. Sigh.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  44. Someone please explain this.. by Rexdude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't buy an internet router from your ISP.
    You don't buy cars from the Highway Department (or equivalent)
    You don't buy your TV,dishwasher,microwave or other electrical appliances from the electricity company.

    So why on earth do americans still meekly accept the logic of buying mobile phones from service providers?

    The sooner unlocked phones proliferate, there won't be a need to jump through such hoops to unlock an iPhone, or any other phone.

    --
    "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
    1. Re:Someone please explain this.. by jnguy · · Score: 1

      You don't _have_ to buy your mobile phone from a service provider, you can just get any old phone that supports the technology that the carrier provides. The carrier also happens to sell the phones. You buy the iPhone from Apple, not AT&T. Its like buying a skateboard and complaining they won't let you use it on the highway. Service providers are allowed to restrict the type of hardware that uses their service. Welcome to America.

    2. Re:Someone please explain this.. by Stringer+Bell · · Score: 1

      Where else does one buy a cell phone, if not from the service providers?

    3. Re:Someone please explain this.. by swb · · Score: 1

      The big problem is all the incompatible networks. Sure, AT&T and T-Mobile are GSM compatible, but I would guess that there are vendor specific things about Sprint/Verizon CDMA networks that would keep an open phone from working. And even if they did, any "good" open phone would have to be GSM and CDMA compatible to really benefit from all the networks.

    4. Re:Someone please explain this.. by Televiper2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, most people lease their Cable/DSL modem from their ISP which is significantly worse than buying. Highway department is a bad analogy since you're not actually buying a service from them. They provide a service that you're able to take advantage of even if you don't pay taxes (tourists, visitors, children). Your electrical company is actually quote far removed from the appliance market. Besides, what are they going to sell you? There's billions of things that you can plug into the wall, are they going to cell all of them? Also, if they did... would they give it to you for what amounts to practically free? I'd say more people don't even consider buying new cell phones unless they're contract is up and the mobile phone company is offering them a new free one. Me, I pick the cheapest one that doesn't look like it's suffering from techno-osteoporosis (feels like it's falling apart in your hand). I just want a phone with some text messaging, an LCD I can see, and some robustness. I'm sure that's how most people feel. They just want a phone that works and perhaps one or two of the additional perks. Getting an unlocked phone and switching providers to save a few bucks would be an unwanted hassle.

      --
      New! Device Legs: These legs will help your poor OEM installed product escape any hamfistedness it may encounter. Ava
    5. Re:Someone please explain this.. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Many people rent their water heaters from oil and gas providers.
      Many people purchase furnaces through oil and gas providers.
      Many people also do in fact purchase a router through their ISP (for managed services).

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    6. Re:Someone please explain this.. by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      And where does one buy a hardline phone, if not the service providers?
      Who knows, maybe someday you'll be able to buy a cell phone in your local supermarket--a cell phone not marked "Tracfone." [grin]

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    7. Re:Someone please explain this.. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Uhh, an electronics store? Radio Shack, Best Buy?

    8. Re:Someone please explain this.. by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      I think the $64,000 question is, will Radio Shack ever sell phones that haven't already been tied to a carrier? Not "Sprint" phones or "at&t" phones or "Verizon" phones--just Optimus phones, SIM chip sold separately?

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    9. Re:Someone please explain this.. by mister.f · · Score: 1

      In the UK, you can by sim-free phones, which can be used on any network, but they're vastly more expensive than getting one through a network provider. Oh, and I got my router from my ISP...

    10. Re:Someone please explain this.. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      And it would be impossible to make a phone which supports both kinds of network? ...

      I didn't know much about CDMA so I looked at:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_mobile_ phone_standards
      Last point sucks bad.

      Can't they just redesign it somehow so you can use drop in cards aswell? Or if you don't like it only buy GSM phones?

    11. Re:Someone please explain this.. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      In Sweden this used to be the case, like 10 years ago, you could buy a phone for say 3500 sek or you could sign up for 24 months at 150 sek / month cost and get the phone for free. Similair cost in the end but then you needed to get a subscription somewhere anyway so it didn't mattered that much. Of course they had you locked in for 24 months thought.

      Anyway this isn't the case today, a "cash card" phone with operator lock will maybe be like 200 sek cheaper, but stores ask for 350 sek or something to unlock them so there really are not much use for them.

      A subscription phone isn't much cheaper at all, maybe 200 sek or so there aswell, thought nowadays the monthly fee for a subscription is much lower and what they offer instead is like "get 2400 sek of on the phone price and pay 100 sek more per month for two years". So then it doesn't really get any cheaper but you don't have to pay the full price for the phone at the same time.

      What do suck is all these "omg get Brand XYZ phone for only 595 sek!" when in fact that is what you pay directly with extra expensive subscription for x amounts of month. They should make that illegal and always provide the total cost in ads instead since it's a major pain to compare phone prices when you have to look thru all the subscribers and cost and so on and calculate it yourself. Also on PAL TV which we use the subscription details are so small they can't be read for the 1 second they are shown ..

    12. Re:Someone please explain this.. by swb · · Score: 1

      I would guess that with software radios they could do pretty much anything.

    13. Re:Someone please explain this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A phone similar to the Motorola v710 has support for both GSM and CDMA.

  45. Why is GPS primary? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    GPS is only good for one thing - telling you where you are.

    Yet almost all the time, I know exactly where I am. What I want to know is where something else is, and how to get there. Thus for me of primary importance is the map browsing, and at that the iPhone excels since it's so easy to do local searches on an area you are viewing, have it generate directions you can follow a turn at a time, and browse nearby streets to be sure exactly how to get there once you are close. Panning and zooming in and out are far easier even than on a browser on my desktop!

    Then there's the issue of how reliable your GPS even is - even with standalone units I have the signals go in and out, basically I don't trust them much. The thing I do like about standalone units, locally stored maps for when you have no network at all, does not apply to any other phone anyway (that I know of).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why is GPS primary? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      The thing I do like about standalone units, locally stored maps for when you have no network at all, does not apply to any other phone anyway (that I know of).

      Live Search for mobile will use up to 64mb of storage card space for offline (and on) map caching.

    2. Re:Why is GPS primary? by really? · · Score: 1

      You just haven't see some of the better GPS related apps on a decent phone. About three and a half years ago I had my first GPS phone with cool apps.

      Imagine this: I was new in town and headed for dinner at my friend's place. I got hopelessly lost - it can happen to the best of us, Shinjuku station can be a bit "complicated" at first. I took a GPS reading and a picture of a significant building/structure and e-mailed them to my friend. She clicked on the link that was added to e-mail and was not only presented with my exact location on Google earth, but also with the extra detail of the building. She called me and told me to ... go five blocks to the south, and you will see, blah blah. Of course I could just have had the map data on a memory card, but that kind of detail is not always feasible for the mazes that many cities in Asia are.

      Another application would be pictures with GPS info as either a place of interest or as "breadcrumbs" for a later return or an entry in a blog/book/whatever.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    3. Re:Why is GPS primary? by smenor · · Score: 1

      I think what you're missing is that even if you always know exactly where you are (which isn't reasonable to assume of everyone... or really anyone all the time), then, unless you're standing still, you've got to tell the map application.

      If you stick a GPS receiver in the iPhone - even a crappy one that doesn't work that well, the iPhone can have at least some idea of where you are without you having to tell it.

      In short - iPhone's maps + GPS would "Just Work".

    4. Re:Why is GPS primary? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      You just haven't see some of the better GPS related apps on a decent phone.

      I have seen some great dedicated in-car systems, and more recent (and expensive) portable Garmin devices a lot better than what any phone can give you.

      I got hopelessly lost - it can happen to the best of us, Shinjuku station can be a bit "complicated" at first. I took a GPS reading and a picture of a significant building/structure and e-mailed them to my friend.

      But in that case, I just search for the intersection I am in within the city I am in. I hope you are not ever so lost you don't know what city you were in! And I can also look at satellite imagry of buildings around to verify location, even on EDGE that all comes up pretty quickly.

      OK, if I am abducted, flown somewhere wearing a hood, and escape into the streets of a nearby city with nothing but an iPhone I may have an issue for a few minutes

      Another application would be pictures with GPS info as either a place of interest or as "breadcrumbs" for a later return or an entry in a blog/book/whatever.

      Cool, but not nearly as useful as the primary use of simply having a map. I don't dispute having GPS is cool and there are useful things that can be done with it, I just really don't see it as so important you couldn't buy a phone without it. The presence of maps is a must-have for me, with the presence of GPS being an concern outweighed by other phone features and the usabiltiy of the map itself (as I said) even more important than GPS, because I value browsing maps far more often than I would having an indicator of where I was.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  46. And well he should by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    What did YOU do with your last 500 hours of spare time?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  47. The Wall by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    and who have aquarium tanks full of lawyers at the ready... as do ATT and Apple.

    It doesn't matter how many piranha you have in the tank as long as the glass is think enough to keep them off your couch. Legally, the glass is quite thick - unlocked cell phones are explicitly legal.

    You, like many Americans, have an irrational fear of lawyers without understanding of the context for when to be afraid.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The Wall by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm just mildly curious how eBay will handle this issue considering how they handled a related issue I'm interested in.

      You, possibly like some people from wherever it is you're from, assume quite a lot. </sarcasm>

  48. Even in Vermont: by norminator · · Score: 1

    Good point, but it's not even just international folks like you who are interested... Here in the US, people in Vermont and no doubt in other places, too, are having troubles getting iPhone service from AT&T. As annoyed as AT&T may be with Apple for not *protecting* their phones well enough, Apple has got to be annoyed with the limitations of AT&T, both foreign and domestic.

  49. Virtual Interface by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Given the interface is entirely virtual, I really question the ability to deliver a product even half as usable as the current iPhone much less the iPhone + updates that might come along from now until when that phone actually ships.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  50. Wider Selection? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Open software and propetiary software without the need for some stupid licenses, resulting in much wider selection

    I'm not quite sure what you mean here, since the application development aspect of the iPhone hacking community requires no licencese and is totally open. In fact I daresay there are a lot more iPhone applications right now than for OpenMoko...

    I love the idea of OpenMoko and may get one myself. But if you think it's at the same level as the iPhone, that's just being delusional and check-list centric.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  51. The Children Are Our Future, Except Under the DCMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree that our world needs kids like this, and he shouldn't get into legal trouble. Someone with deep pockets should underwrite this kid's college education.

  52. I wouldn't expect that european market by Nursie · · Score: 1

    Don't know about the rest of Europe but brits buy phones that are "free" anyway.

    The market for expensive phones without a contract is tiny.
    If there's a two year contract attached, brits will expect the handset to be free, or nearly so.

    Selling a phone for that much cash just won't fly here when we have a huge selection of phones available for nothing over contract price.

  53. Its a shame... by leon.gandalf · · Score: 1

    that the IPHONE is GSM as there are NO GSM carries in the US that do not SUCK.

    1. Re:Its a shame... by majortom1981 · · Score: 1

      That depends on where you live. ATT and VErizon here on long island have the exact same signal and service. Tmboile is 2-3 times worse then both of them.

    2. Re:Its a shame... by leon.gandalf · · Score: 1

      This is true.... even the "good" carriers SUCK somewhere, or at something...

  54. Very ingenious by Coucho · · Score: 0

    The hardware OR'ing method that the kid used was very clever. We need kids like him who think outside of the box.

    --
    *pSig = NULL;
  55. There's already a tutorial online, you know... by MouronaC · · Score: 1

    Tutorial: "Unlock" your iPhone with SuperSim If you don't mind not following the verbal instructions here's a guy using his iphone on an european network http://videos.sapo.pt/5VM3Fe1oZ8sKe1CP

  56. Group Project by mkiwi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I want to reiterate that this was not just one person doing the entire hack, but many many people from all over the world contributing to this project. This was not a one man show. Congrats to the kid for soldering a wire to the pcb trace, but seriously there are people who did more important things like reverse-engineer iPhone's Firmware. He wouldn't know what to change on the logic board if not for all that work. Those are the unsung heroes of this event.

  57. AT&T Lies by k1e0x · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Maybe I will buy one yet. This goes to show all those lies about "special modifications" to the AT&T network were total bullshit.

    --
    Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
  58. More Like....Slashcentric. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The only loser it AT&T. And one can easily argue that if the provided a good connection product, at a competitive price and backed it up with quality service they'd have nothing to worry about."

    Uh, huh. And how does that apply to countries other than the US?

    "But, of course, the only reason for all service providers all over the globe to use lock-ins is because the last thing any phone company offers is any of the above."

    Damn it's too easy to get an insightful around here. Tell me if you've ever heard this phrase? Subsidized product.

  59. Now if I Were an Apple Marketdroid... by porkrind · · Score: 1

    If I were an Apple marketdroid, and I had an inkling that other freed phones were coming out, like say, OpenMoko, I might think to myself...

    1. yeah, we can do a hackable phone, or...
    2. we'll sort of lock it up, but make it just hackable enough so that droves of hackers will toil away to open it up, then...
          2a. step back while we get lots of free publicity as the media rush to report about every latest hack
          2b. profit!

    Now I'm no Apple marketdroid, but I'm just sayin'...

    -John Mark

  60. Information just wants to be Free by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    And I for one say "Take these shackles off my iPhone!"

    Let Freedom Ring!

    Ring. Ring. Ring.

    Yes?

    Um, sure, the pizza will be there in 20 minutes.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  61. Just wait for them to be sold in Belgium by houghi · · Score: 2, Informative

    In Belgium sim-locking is illegal. It is expected for the end of 2007, so probably X-mas.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  62. It's gone past the blog by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

    You may have noticed an article from a New Jersey paper about his exploit in the /. summary. The Associated Press has picked it up from there. There's no hiding this now.

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  63. iPhones on T-Mobile by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

    No. When Engadget tested the corporate software hack, they switched their iPhone to T-Mobile using an already-on T-Mobile SIM. They got bars, and it appears that it worked fine.
    Maybe Apple could consider issuing iPhone 2.0 to T-Mobile in two years. The thing is, T-Mobile exists in Europe, where phones are prohibited from being locked down absolutely, and there might be European outrage if they heard T-Mobile America had it and T-Mobile Europe couldn't. Contrariwise, at&t is all-American: if one wants to lock in an advanced GSM phone exclusively, at&t is the place to go.

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    1. Re:iPhones on T-Mobile by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      Maybe Apple could consider issuing iPhone 2.0 to T-Mobile in two years.

      Or maybe T-Mobile could consider offering the hack to any Iphone owner who wants it? I could see the competing cellular carriers latching onto this and offering "no-cost hack of your Iphone if you switch" deals.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
  64. You would think-"/." Court judgement handed down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We are going to be rich !" I don't think that's what they are going to do though, I think they are going to sue some people. Sorta lets you know where they are coming from doesn't it ? They want to compete by locking you in. Sorta like some other large company I can't remember the name of just now."

    Make note audience, innocent until proven guilty when referring to individuals. Guilty until proven innocent when referring to "the establishment".

  65. get the i-clone! problem solved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or you could just by the chinese i-clone for $160, and they will send it with a 1G mSD card... already unlocked, with a real sim card reader...

    wow, how hard was that?

    screw apple. they have always been the kings of overpriced, overhyped gadgets.

  66. Controversial by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    It's only a phone. If you don't like the provider there are plenty of other phones which work with other providers.

    --
    Deleted
  67. Oh, I'm suuuuure there's huge demand by SEE · · Score: 0, Troll

    These hacks are much bigger news for those outside America. Expect to see an industry spring up to meet European (and Asian?) demand for freed iPhones. I mean, hey, what European wouldn't want to pay northward of $600 for an obsolete (2.5 G) phone?
  68. Interview with George Hotz by E-Tray · · Score: 1
    Why he did it:

    HOTZ: The truth is because our family has T-Mobile. We have a T-Mobile family plan. And if I wanted AT&T, I'd have to pay for it. So, I could either decide to pay for AT&T or just work to unlock the iPhone.
    http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2007/08/2 4/PM200708244.html
    1. Re:Interview with George Hotz by prxp · · Score: 1

      HOTZ: The truth is because our family has T-Mobile. We have a T-Mobile family plan. And if I wanted AT&T, I'd have to pay for it. So, I could either decide to pay for AT&T or just work to unlock the iPhone. So.... humm... it's always about the money!
    2. Re:Interview with George Hotz by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      The phone itself costs $600. That's already steep. If he already had a cell-phone plan from T-Mobile, you can understand why he'd want to just buy an iPhone to put on it, and not an at&t contract...

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    3. Re:Interview with George Hotz by prxp · · Score: 1

      I give up making jokes... nobody ever gets me! :P

  69. How Visual Voicemail works: by StreetStealth · · Score: 1

    I think this was either in an Ars Technica article or on TWiT, but VV actually isn't that hard: Working normally, the iPhone just downloads compressed audio files from AT&T's voicemail server as they come in and stores them locally to be played back.

    With Jailbreak and a bit of hacking, it shouldn't be impossible to have the phone get the files from a different source, if necessary even scraping and parsing the usual voicemail audio prompts. Ok, so maybe that could be pretty hard to do... But still, in theory, it's straightforward.

    --
    Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
  70. is the touch screen really worth all this trouble? by majortom1981 · · Score: 1

    Is a touch screen really worth all this trouble? couldnt i get one of those pda phones that does everything that the iphone does but with 3g for cheaper?

  71. DMCA. by megaditto · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure DMC(P)A might be broad enough to make what he did illegal.

    With this in mind, congrats to the kid. He'll be looking at doing hard time in some Federal pound-in-the-ass prison over this if ATT and Apple complain.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  72. Oops, above is incorrect by megaditto · · Score: 1

    Apparently DMCPA excludes cellphones (though it still applies to game consoles). Should have finished reading TFA before posting the above, sorry.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  73. Quick update on the Auction by prxp · · Score: 1

    The bid for his auctions has passed 25 million dollars. Some folks are probably messing around the auction. But bidders' profiles are not the scam type, some even have 100-499 positive qualifications and 5+ yeas inside ebay. Will the ebay record o 4,9 million dollars be surpassed or have scammers become more sophisticated?

    1. Re:Quick update on the Auction by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      But bidders' profiles are not the scam type, some even have 100-499 positive qualifications and 5+ yeas inside ebay.
      Most likely these are accounts that have been compromised and this seemed like as good a time as any for fun and games.
      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  74. for sale on ebay.... by skorf · · Score: 1

    You probably all know this by now.,. but have you seen it? http://offer.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewBids&it em=230164884672 bidding is at $26,001,100.00 how long do you think it will take the guys over at http://iphonesimfree.com/ to earn that much? i think i'm going to email geohot and ask him for the 2500 bucks i need to buy my motorcycle... he should have it soon. yes i know i'm a freeloader!

    1. Re:for sale on ebay.... by Steel+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      $99,999,999.00 Wow, is Warren Buffet bidding?

  75. This says a lot about AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What amazes me isn't how many people want an iPhone, but how many people want one without AT&T. It's beyond weird that a company like Apple would team up with a company like AT&T. It's like Satan working out a deal to do a Broadway musical with Jesus. It's so crazy that it becomes almost surreal, but without the cool-yet-scary-factor of a Satan/Jesus Broadway musical.

    I don't own an iPhone due to the fact that, absent hacking, I'd have to use AT&T. It seems a lot of people feel the same way and unless Apple changes partners faster than a 50 year old at a swingers conference, the iPhone won't reach its full potential. It's a really cool product tied to a company that someone as dense as a lifelong America Online customer could recognize as lousy hookup.

  76. But can I buy... by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    ... a phone that's just a phone?

    OK, throw in text messages, because I work with teenagers.

    But that's it.Who will sell me that?

    1. Re:But can I buy... by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      I bought a TrakPhone. It's still my only wireless phone. I need it just as infrequently as I thought I would, and it was only $16 at WalMart and I only have to buy $10 increments of time on it every few months.

      It's just a phone, though it doesn't have text messages. Because I deal in teenagers as little as possible (get out of my f'ing orchard, you little creeps!)

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
  77. No it doesn't by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I don't think you can use some of the email features with other systems.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  78. Jaguar's getting it? by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

    That's the improved Jaguar, the one that's got the hints, that did that naughty grille. Parent was railing against Jaguar before Ford bought it, the one that built classy V-12 sports cars.

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  79. I can jackson samuel-s fucking fuck compare it by namespan · · Score: 2, Funny

    How the fuck can you compare *that* with OpenMoko, a completely Free phone with a Free firmware, Free Operating System, Free applications, and community of Free Software guys prepared to spend $450 each just to debug the hardware for the benefit of humanity, so that for the first time ever, you can buy a phone that does whatever you want

    Fuck, to fucking compare the fuck out of that fucking comparison, I fucking could fucking point out that for fucking fuck's sake, that fuck, it's like fucking OS X, sure fucks it's fucking less fucking free than fucking Linux, and fuck yes it's fucking more fuck bucks than fucking commodity fucked intel fucking hardware, but sweet freaky fucks if you're fucking aligned with the fucking basic goals of the fucking platform it fucking gets out of your fucking way and lets you fucking get your fucking work done.

    The fuckers who keep fucking *whining* about how the fucking hardware they like to fuck with isn't fucking getting as many fucking marks on its fucking dance card as they'd like can't seem to fucking understand that there are fucking products out there that fucking may not align with *their* fucking particular fucking goals but still fucking-a align with other fucking people. The fucking iPhone fuckign does fucking exactly what some fucking people want it to, even if it doesn't fucking compile motherfucking gentoo.

    Different fucking strokes for different fucking folks, mothafucka'. Can you handle it?

    And BTW, the fucking folks who are fucking spending fuckloads amound of fucking time on this kind of fucking crazy platform fucking may fucking well be fucking smarter than their fucking open-source critics if the fucking iPhone does in fucking fact become a fucking popular mobile platform, like there's quake-fucking indications it fucking will. Maybe the OpenFuckingMoko will find a fucking place too, but fuck, there are very fucking few fucking consumer spaces where it's fucking best to bet on open fucking source.

    Fuck with that, fuckers.

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    1. Re:I can jackson samuel-s fucking fuck compare it by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 1

      you sir are the fucking man !

    2. Re:I can jackson samuel-s fucking fuck compare it by Shabbs · · Score: 1

      Funniest. Slashdot. Post. Ever!

      --
      Mark
  80. Nonsense by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This appears to be yet another comment from someone scared of corporate lawyers.

    Fact: The idea that "Shrink-Wrap licensing" is a viable legal concept in this country, even these days, is a myth. It has never been tried in higher courts for software, and they have been thrown out in every case of which I am aware, when it comes to hardware.

    When you walk into a store, and buy something off the shelf, it is YOURS, and you can do with it what you damned well please as long as you are not harming others (like hitting them with it). The only legal exception is if you have agreed otherwise, in advance of the purchase!

    Even if such "shring-wrap" licensing, for such things as DRM, were otherwise legal, they would constitute "contracts of adhesion" which, in brief, are contracts that are not negotiable by the customer before purchase. ("Take it or leave it.") Courts are automatically biased against Contracts of Adhesion and routinely throw them out of court. The general idea is: if you can't negotiate it, it isn't a real contract.

    So... yes, the corporate lawyers might try to step in and stop this, but if anybody has lawyers of their own that are worth the title, they will squash the oppressors without much trouble.

  81. Solved for by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    In short - iPhone's maps + GPS would "Just Work".

    Well, that hasn't exactly been the expereince I've always had with any small GPS.

    But the iPhone solves for that problem by presenting drving directions either whole or in segments - you can tell the iPhone you are off on your journey, and tell it when you complete a segment. Thus it keeps in sync with your position and offers a details local map for each segment you traverse.

    The great thing is the iPhone Google map app works with URLS that include the customized path capability Google just recently added to maps, so if you click on them in an email or a web page you get instant directions to follow with no setup.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Solved for by smenor · · Score: 1

      I agree that the iPhone Google Map app is great (both for directions and as a better 411)... but even with the driving directions, without you have to put in your starting location.

      If you're in a strange city and get a hankering for calamari, you can't just type in "seafood" and expect to get a list of restaurants without telling the phone (at least roughly) where you are (and if you don't live there, you might have trouble narrowing that down).

      You don't even need full-fledged GPS either - just getting a rough location from the towers would go a long way.

      If Boost can do it, I've got to think that Apple could too (and I have no doubt that they eventually will).

    2. Re:Solved for by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      If you're in a strange city and get a hankering for calamari, you can't just type in "seafood" and expect to get a list of restaurants without telling the phone (at least roughly) where you are (and if you don't live there, you might have trouble narrowing that down).

      But again in reality that is not an issue, because I can either search for an intersection or business I am at, and then easily run a second search from there for whatever (just zoom out a little and search). And usually I do know enough about where I am I can easily zoom into the rough location, even in a city I've never been in, because you can often see larger landmarks or know from trip planning where you are staying within a city.

      Perhaps sometime they'll get a rough estimate from local towers, but I don't know if that intermediate form of location help will be very useful compared to a real GPS, or beyond what they have already.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Solved for by smenor · · Score: 1

      ...that is not an issue, because I can either search for an intersection or business I am at, and then easily run a second search from there for whatever (just zoom out a little and search).

      Sure you can do it... but it's an unnecessary extra step that more or less doubles the amount of time you have to spend searching for something.

      The whole point of the thing is to make things easier and more convenient.

      Maybe I'm just too lazy and impatient, but, as much as I love the Google Maps feature, it annoys me that just about every single time I use it I have to go through the extra legwork.

      Even if the data from the cell towers just narrowed it down to within a mile or two radius, that would be more than enough given the default scale of the maps and the range of the Google local search.

      I'm not saying it's not useful in its current form (I love it and it utterly destroys the alternative of calling 411), but I really don't see how you can deny that giving the iPhone a way of knowing (roughly) where you are would be a significant improvement.

  82. This wasn't the first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPhone was actually hacked first by some people in the Czech Republic who run the site bladox.com. It requires one of their "Tubo Sim" products to do but is much less complex than this hack which followed shortly after. You can check out the timeline of these events at iPhone-Hacks.com.

  83. How dare you! US law is GLOBAL LAW! by fantomas · · Score: 1

    "And I have no idea whether this would hold up in Europe, where this hack is actually useful."

    How dare you? American law is applicable globally! all other legal systems are in place merely to resolve local squabbles about missing donkeys, lost goldfish or similar. For all important matters, US law takes precedence. And we'll back up those claims with Awe, Shock, Might, Force and occasional invasion if these little peasant nations don't respect this God ordained fact!

  84. Re:N800 by robin.com.au · · Score: 1

    No mention of Nokia N800 ? It has Skype, Google Talk with webcam, and pretty much do what a linux pc can do.

    --
    robin
  85. They have to give up locking anyway, for Europe by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    In Denmark, the phone companies are obliged to unlock their phones after 6 month, and I believe similar regulation is in existence in other EU countries.

  86. yup, in the Uk, supermarkets sell phones by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Who knows, maybe someday you'll be able to buy a cell phone in your local supermarket--a cell phone not marked "Tracfone." [grin]

    http://direct.tesco.com/homepage/phones.aspx

    online as well, wooo!

    Local supermarket always has 20 or so models in stock from major phone companies.

    Goodness knows how many mobile phone shops there are selling handsets and comparing deals for you. People like Carphone Warehouse.

    I guess you do things differently in the USA, not as free and independent a system.

  87. Re:N800 by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

    That's not a mobile phone, it's a tablet computer. Two indicators: A mobile phone can connect to a cellular phone network, and a mobile phone generally can be held to the side of your head for talking.

    --
    -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  88. Re:N800 by robin.com.au · · Score: 1

    Does it really matter if it's connecting to a phone network or through Skype/Gizmo? As long as you are able to communicate. True that phone network is more ubiquitous, but depends on your needs and location. For me, I don't use the phone that much, but I use the computer heaps and would love something more portable than a laptop, and the N800 seems much more capable than the iPhone. It also has a touchscreen but not multitouch of course. Multitouch seems to be the only unique feature on the iPhone in comparison to the N800.

    I'm surprised that there isn't much talk about N800 at all on ./

    Anyway I may have read somewhere that the successor to the N800 will have 'real' phone capability.

    --
    robin
  89. iPhones & iTunes by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

    Touche.
    Apple simply doesn't care much about the business market yet--think of the Mac vs. PC ads, where they try to depict PC as a serious business computer, unlike the Mac. If Apple wanted the business market, they would try harder to sell computers there.
    They could've made ways to sync iPhones without iTunes. There is a program called iSync that works on Macs; that would be reasonable for syncing a business phone. But Apple hasn't ported it to Windows; instead, they create a security hole in iTunes by letting it attach to MS Outlook! [grrr]
    If there were more Apples in businesses, then serious business iPhones--or maybe MacPhones--might be more practical.
    One more point: Steve Jobs has announced that the iPhone is the next iPod, which would also explain the iPhone-iTunes connection sufficiently. Jobs was thinking in terms of "entertainment device that makes phone calls." This, again, may be a little like making phones that play Solitare, except there already are business phones that play Solitare.

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  90. But if anybody has lawyers of their own... by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

    The problem is, unless you are rich, you likely do not have a lawyer of your own except on special occasions. Normal people can't afford to put them on retainer continually. And even when they do get a lawyer, lawyers worth the name can be hundreds of dollars an hour.
    Shrinkwrap contracts tend to be applied to relatively inexpensive items. You really need to be devoted to your principles if you want to spend $10,000 to fight a $1000 shrinkwrap contract--and that would be expensive for shrinkwrap contracting.
    In short--de jure, illegal, maybe; but de facto, the only way for most of us to fight it is to ignore it outright.
    Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, worth the title or otherwise.

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  91. this just in by Robocoastie · · Score: 1

    This just in... women hacks her dishwasher. "I just wanted to get more energy savings by increasing the water pressure at the beginning of the cycle, I don't recommend putting your china in it as a result but average dishes stand up well to the pressure." Representatives from Dishwashers R Us gave no comment except: "We must consult our legal team to determine the specific terms of use she violated." The women's local congressman when pressed about it claimed: "The DMCA will apply I'm sure, we must protect industry from its customers who think they actually own what they paid money for." Back to you John... John: "In other news, an elderly man has hacked the speed protection throttle software on his wheelchair saying he just missed the feeling of wind in what little hair he has left..."

  92. All Apple and AT&T have to do is... by aiguyaiguy · · Score: 1

    Right now the reason this works is that Apple had the bright idea of making everyone initiate their service plan from home using the iTunes software. The phone still requires a two year AT&T service plan. So great you say just buy your iPhone, do the hack and don't activate with iTunes. All this does is require Apple and AT&T activate your service plan at the store, something they're not set up for just yet. But when they do even if you hack it to work with another carrier you're still paying AT&T for 2 years until your contract is up. Of course Apple may not mind selling more iPhones in countries where they don't have an exclusive contract with AT&T as long as they're not selling the actual iphone at a loss just to get the service contract kickback.

  93. perfectly legal in Australia by bandmassa · · Score: 1

    While Copyright Law may be abused in the US to shut this hacking down, we haven't yet sunk that low in Australia. The thing that would make a hacked iPhone illegal here is the much more sensible (and enforcable) law that a modified telecommunications device is not allowed on the network without official approval.

    You see, we make SENSIBLE laws in countries outside the USA. And yes, there ARE countries outside the USA, and I don't just mean Mexico and Canada! :^0

    --
    "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
  94. There isnt much apple or AT&T can do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're already skating on thin ice by only having an exclusive deal with each other, if they start attacking people for trying to use their product on another service, they can be put under anti-trust investigations. especially AT&T, for locking out their competition through forceful means. But this is all in the gray area thanks to the DMCA.

    Legally, after 2 years, you can request your carrier unlock your phone. Though they will fight it by trying to convince you they cant or they have to sell you a new cell phone. Same with how they are with unlocked phones. they try to tell you your phone cant possibly work with their system, even though that's an outright lie. I worked for one, when I brought that topic up, one sales rep got pissed and said I can never ask that question again or I'll lose my job. the other, didnt know, and finally one who had been working with us for a long time told me that scenario, because I wanted to be ready for the unknown etc (aka, I wanted to now how they think so I know what to avoid in the future :P) and they told me all that.

    So if AT&T or apple start suing people for unlocking the phones they bought, I can smell an anti-trust lawsuit. it's one thing if you're cracking the phone to circumvent accounting so you get free minutes or hacking it to copy the OS, or to get around DRM. but this is to simply free it from a carrier. which isnt illegal.

  95. the "complex" hardware unlock touted in media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is actually just pulling one of the address lines high so reads are always from a writeable rather than read-only area. If it were true that this 17-year-old were a lone hacker, I'd certainly label him precocious (this is a compliment!), but he admits to having at least three other players, and the hardware technique itself is trivial to a seasoned EE.

    What he has done immensely well is put various people's work together with their agreement, including some of his own, and explain the process, then give away the method as a vehicle to sell his skills. I congratulate his not trying to hoard the method as HK hackers have done (sorry, you weren't the first!), or the iphonesimfree site. He also has fine soldering skills.

    Last weekend I managed to get full control of some other piece of ARM-based consumer electronics [which I own and was not connected to any third party service, thank you lawyers]: at some stage the zero page (interrupt vectors) and interrupt handlers were mapped to ROM, but the PMTs were in an unprotected page of RAM(!), so it was fundamentally a matter of remapping the zero page and changing the SWI vector to my own code, giving me Supervisor mode. This has almost whet my appetite for a real challenge, but Apple are insulting developers by denying official support via SDKs etc, so I can't bring myself to love the iPhone enough to try to give it freedom ;-).

  96. Steve Job's 101 by armada · · Score: 1

    I bet you anything you want that Apple will take no legal steps against the hacker. ATT on the other hand will be a different story. I gurantee that Jobs fully expected the phone to be hacked. They are now sitting pretty. ATT still has to honor it's deal with Apple since they did nothing wrong and now anyone can use the iphone. Sales will skyrocket. Brilliant SOB.

    --
    "This message was sent from an Apple //GS"
  97. why not use the linux based phone from Trolltech by viking80 · · Score: 1

    If you want to have a phone to hack and play with, why not use the linux based phone from Trolltech>
    The software i currently in use on cellphones from Siemens and Samsung and others(?)

    http://trolltech.com/products/qtopia/greenphone

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org