Slashdot Mirror


Comet Unexpectedly Brightens a Millionfold

swordgeek writes "Comet 17P/Holmes, a relatively obscure and (until a few days ago) dim object, has suddenly flared to be literally a million times brighter, going from magnitude 18 to 2.8. It is just outside of the constellation Perseus, which puts it high in the sky and ideal for viewing at this time of year. The comet still appears starlike even in binoculars but should grow to several arcminutes across over the next few nights. The comet is now readily visible to the naked eye. This is a completely unexpected once-in-a-lifetime event, so get out your finest optics (even if it's just your eyes) and go comet watching!"

276 comments

  1. we need a comet, a big one by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    i don't think we've seen a really big bright comet in how long? hasn't it been decades, or centuries even? anywhere in the world?

    i mean a really big bright one that eats the whole sky

    we need a big bright comet because history teaches us that warring factions oftentimes stop their fighting and lay down their arms when shocked at the sight

    so we need a big bright comet pronto

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:we need a comet, a big one by jcicora · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does Halley's comet not count??

    2. Re:we need a comet, a big one by 3chuck3 · · Score: 1

      No it is not a Flaring Comet, it is a Reptoid battleship, firing it's retro rocketts

      our old reptile olderlord haft returnieths!!!!!

    3. Re:we need a comet, a big one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      McNaught was pretty big, and it was earlier this year. Not "ZOMG end of world" big, but it attained a magnitude of -6.0 or so (visible in the day!).

    4. Re:we need a comet, a big one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last coming of Halley's Comet was not that impressive.

    5. Re:we need a comet, a big one by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hale Bopp was both large, and bright. So.. not sure where you're going with this.

    6. Re:we need a comet, a big one by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      It'll take a few thousand years for their rocketts to reach earth. We're DOOOMED! DOOOOOMED!

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    7. Re:we need a comet, a big one by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Informative

      Forget Halley's. It was a dissappointment last time anyways. Hale-Bopp and Hyakutake were even more recent (within the last 11 years) and were spectacular.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    8. Re:we need a comet, a big one by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not with our president. Bush would just point to the heavens and say, "See? God hates terrorism, too!"

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    9. Re:we need a comet, a big one by laejoh · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well yeah, we're talking about a comet that brightens, not a president!

    10. Re:we need a comet, a big one by mikiN · · Score: 1

      No, he wouldn't. He would claim that the comet is a terrorist and has WMD's. Then he would try to convince Congress to agree to a 3.2 trillion dollar spending bill to shoot it out of the sky before it strikes first.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    11. Re:we need a comet, a big one by lrohrer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually Revelations/Ezekial talks about a poison raining down on the earth presumably from a comet. That assumes of course we are talking about the END TIMES.

    12. Re:we need a comet, a big one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That assumes of course we are talking about the END TIMES.

      That also assumes that one believes in such fairy tales. Myself, I prefer Peter Rabbit.

    13. Re:we need a comet, a big one by rossdee · · Score: 1

      Pread that the 1910 appearance was pretty spectacular.

      But I agree about the 1986 one - I could just make it out with binoculars

    14. Re:we need a comet, a big one by Sperbels · · Score: 4, Insightful

      [quote]i mean a really big bright one that eats the whole sky[/quote] Hyukatake had a tail that stretched across half the sky at its best. You guys don't know this because you live under a gigantic light bubble.

    15. Re:we need a comet, a big one by somersault · · Score: 1

      You mean our great great great awesome grandchildren are

      --
      which is totally what she said
    16. Re:we need a comet, a big one by blahlemon · · Score: 1

      The reptillian over lord never did showup, but the comet returned and smashed into the planet!

      --
      It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
    17. Re:we need a comet, a big one by way2slo · · Score: 1

      Actually, history has often looked upon comets a bad omens, like War and the death of Kings.

    18. Re:we need a comet, a big one by NormalVisual · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bingo. There are a *lot* of people out there that don't know what a night sky really looks like. It's kind of saddening to read reports of people calling in during widespread power failures to report "a strange silvery band in the sky", when it's just that they've never seen the Milky Way before because of all the light pollution.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    19. Re:we need a comet, a big one by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too late. The liberals would already be blaming the comet on global warming.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    20. Re:we need a comet, a big one by misterooga · · Score: 1

      Damn, I missed the HALFTIME.

    21. Re:we need a comet, a big one by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      i don't think we've seen a really big bright comet in how long? hasn't it been decades, or centuries even? anywhere in the world?... we need a big bright comet because history teaches us that warring factions oftentimes stop their fighting and lay down their arms when shocked at the sight
      Historically, may be - when people feared what the "gods" might do.

      Today? Not likely, except may among small tribes that haven't touched modern civilization yet. But we wouldn't know about them any way...so...life will continue as normal.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    22. Re:we need a comet, a big one by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Hale-Bopp and Hyakutake were good, but Comet C/2006 P1 (McNaught) was without a doubt a "Great Comet". It was a wonderful sight in the suburbs, but those with dark skys that could see the whole tail plume were lucky, lucky bastards...

    23. Re:we need a comet, a big one by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 1

      Seems like that 1910 appearance didn't stop that World War I thing...

    24. Re:we need a comet, a big one by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Hopefully not King George II, as then we'd be stuck with Cheney running as an incumbent.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    25. Re:we need a comet, a big one by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the show a comet puts on has been dampened by all our modern lighting?

      Its rare now for lots of people to see anything substantial so it would have to be a REALLY big event to be seen.
      In the mists of time however the skies were open and the heavenly show was spectacular.

      I know when I go abroad I try to find time to do some stargazing because its impossible here.
      (Manchester, England is known for its rain more than its visible light astronomy)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    26. Re:we need a comet, a big one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, given the number of disasters (natural or otherwise) during his presidency, I don't think Bush is particularly liked by supernatural powers.

    27. Re:we need a comet, a big one by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      WWI started in 1914, mate. It hadn't even begun in 1910...

    28. Re:we need a comet, a big one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WW1 was 1914-1918.

    29. Re:we need a comet, a big one by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      i don't think we've seen a really big bright comet in how long? hasn't it been decades, or centuries even?

      Huh? Comet McNaught last year was magnificent. Pure white against the orange of the sunset behind it. And a few days later, once it was high in the sky during full dark, you could see the tail arcing over about 60 degrees.

    30. Re:we need a comet, a big one by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      i mean a really big bright one that eats the whole sky

      I know it wouldn't be a comet, but, I have thought about this in the past. Wouldn't a few hundred pounds (or more) of sand ejected from the space shuttle so that it had a slower velocity create a really cool, massive, "shooting stars" display?

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  2. UK? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 0, Troll

    What about in the UK? Where would I need to look to see this thing?

    I know /. is American centered but the world is a pretty big place and those of us not in that continent might like to know where we can/can't see things.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:UK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      When the clouds clear up, and the rain stops.

      Oh, right, UK.

      Never.

    2. Re:UK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I know /. is American centered...

      Do you have stars and stuff over there?

    3. Re:UK? by Mushdot · · Score: 5, Informative

      Looking at the last link in the summary I think we ought to be able to see it

      Look for Cassiopeia ( a big and fairly obvious W or M in the sky) and track your eyes downward from it. It's going to be just down to the left of the bright star Mirfak in Perseus.

      I wonder what the reason for the brightening is? Maybe it hit Voyager.

    4. Re:UK? by gomiam · · Score: 3, Informative
      Fortunately for you, Earth has this weird movement called rotation that guarantees the anybody at the same latitude will be able to watch the same phenomenon as long as it is independent of Earth movement and lasts at least a rotation ;-)

      This is not an eclipse, so you should be able to watch it from the UK, clouds permitting. If you are worried about latitude, you can check the low-cost flights to Spain and come to watch it from here over the weekend. I think you can see Perseus from the UK, anyway.

    5. Re:UK? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Sorry old bean but the comet will be hidden by the smog dontcha know.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    6. Re:UK? by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, the Earth rotates, and since we are both in the Northern hemisphere and even roughly the same latitude, you should be able to use the same chart -- http://media.skyandtelescope.com/images/Comet+Holmes+Finder_l.jpg

    7. Re:UK? by famebait · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, umm, the UK and the US are not that different in latitude, and as for the east-west thing, last I checked the earth makes a complete revoluion every day.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    8. Re:UK? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      If you're in the UK you won't see it, due to the permanent cloud cover and rain, so don't worry about it!

      However it should be pretty much overhead in the middle of the night in the NE sky, look for the Perseus constellation. Everyone in the northern hemisphere should be able to spot it according to TFA.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:UK? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      I'm bemused by the CIA World Factbook's statement on the UK page that says, "more than one-half of the days are overcast". Is this unusual in the rest of the world?

    10. Re:UK? by mrjb · · Score: 3, Funny

      What about in the UK? Where would I need to look to see this thing?
      Regardless of country - You would need to look up.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    11. Re:UK? by razorh · · Score: 2, Funny

      ?? I don't see ANY of those lines when I look into the sky at night, is there some filter/layer I need to turn on somewhere?

    12. Re:UK? by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Try hitting Ctrl-;

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    13. Re:UK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    14. Re:UK? by curmudgeous · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the reason for the brightening is?

      They're just kicking in the thrusters so they can make orbit.

    15. Re:UK? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      "more than one-half of the days are overcast". Is this unusual in the rest of the world?

      It varies. Is it unusual for Seattle or Vancouver, BC? No. In Vancouver it actually rains on more than one-half of the days every year. Is it unusual for the southwestern part of the US? Probably. I have never seen so much unclouded sky and bright sunlight as I did in southern California and Arizona. I assume Mexico is the same way, since it's even closer to the equator.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    16. Re:UK? by blahlemon · · Score: 1

      I would just like to take a moment to remind you... "It's a small world after all" DISCLAIMER: I am not a Disney Employee or in any way conected to the Disney Company. This quote has been used purely for entertainment purposes and I am not making any money off of it's use. The preceeding comment may not reflect the views or opinions of the poster or Slashdot. This post is copyright and can not be used without prior approval from the poster. All violations will be deal with harshly and possible in accordance with local, state, national, international and intergalactic laws. So has the comet spoken, so shall it be.

      --
      It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
    17. Re:UK? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Well, based on this table I would say almost ALL US cities have half overcast days since only 8 listed have more than 188 days of sunshine.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    18. Re:UK? by tkw954 · · Score: 1

      What about in the UK? Where would I need to look to see this thing?

      Regardless of country - You would need to look up.

      The "up" part of the universe is still pretty big.

    19. Re:UK? by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      To expand on this, in the night sky, Perseus looks like a rough square with four curvy lines jutting out of it, and with the northward side of the square "bent" out by a bright star. That star is Mirfak. Perseus isn't as obvious as Cassiopeia, or even Andromeda (just south of Cassiopeia), so if you're in a city and are unfamiliar with the night sky, you might have trouble locating it (just a couple miles out of town should be enough to get a clear enough view). To help orient yourself, the "feet" of Perseus, facing south, look like two triangles (a third triangle, southeast of Perseus and southwest of Andromeda, is the constellation Triangulum).

      --
      "We consider that six courts and an asylum claim are a rather odd way of returning to Sweden within a month."
    20. Re:UK? by Cecil · · Score: 1

      * This does not include Partly Sunny or Partly Cloudy days. See Full Table for Complete List

      Partly cloudy days do not count as "overcast". Yes, being overcast for more than half the year is unusual in almost all the rest of the world.

    21. Re:UK? by Ticklemonster · · Score: 1

      If you were running Ubuntu, you could go to synaptic and install a free astronomy program and set it up for your location and time, and find out exactly where perseus is or is going to be, then stroll outdoors and realize it's cloudy. Dang.

      --
      Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
    22. Re:UK? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Same place, little higher, five or six hours earlier. Comets don't much care what your longitude is.

      rj

    23. Re:UK? by witte · · Score: 1

      Try "Stellarium". (free software)
      http://www.stellarium.org/

      Set the appropriate time and location, and let it search for Perseus; the comet is in that general direction.

      (Or were you joking about the fabulous star-gazing weather in the UK ? ;)

    24. Re:UK? by boris111 · · Score: 1

      fairly obvious W

      Oh so what you're saying is George W is the Anti-Christ... got it now.
    25. Re:UK? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Maybe it hit Voyager.

      You mean Janeway is dead?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    26. Re:UK? by Gat0r30y · · Score: 1

      Indeed, but its a lot smaller than the empty half of the universe.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  3. Perhaps I'll go look. by camperdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps I'll go look. Despite all the hype, Halley was a bust. Kohoutek may have been the comet of the century, but that was last century. I hope this one doesn't disappoint.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Perhaps I'll go look. by rk · · Score: 1

      I thought Hale-Bopp was spectacular. You could clearly see the two tails and it was close enough that scientists discovered a third cometary tail.

      And to the British guy who asked: I think the constellation Perseus is the same constellation in the UK. You may be screwed if you're in Australia though. I don't think you can see Perseus from there, but I'm not sure.

    2. Re:Perhaps I'll go look. by hypnagogue · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Despite all the hype, Halley was a bust.
      Baloney. It was beautiful in March and April 1986, by far the best comet views in my lifetime, with a bright detailed tail 8 degrees long. Hyukatake and Hale-Bopp were good, but not that good.

      Let me guess, you went out to see Halley in October or November of 1985, before perihelion, long before peak, when it was in the night sky. Sorry, the views were in the spring, in the morning sky. Just like they were telling folks on the news; no one listened.

      --
      Liberty you never use is liberty you lose.
    3. Re:Perhaps I'll go look. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend actually gave me a ticket for a Comet Halley plane flight for (from memory) April 5th 1986.

      We flew NNE from Perth (Australia) at 41000 feet for about 2 hours. There was no light pollution and we were above a whole chunk of the atmosphere.

      The view of the night sky was spectacular under those conditions. Halley was certainly *much* more impressive than on the ground, and through binoculars even more so.

      There were 2 Cosmonauts on Mir at that time who I am sure had the best view, but I count myself very fortunate to be one of the people who had the next best!

  4. explanation? by dr_tube · · Score: 0, Interesting

    So what could have caused this to happen? No explanation?

  5. Cult Suicides? by abug · · Score: 0

    Were there any obscure cults waiting for something like this? One similar to Heaven's Gate perhaps?

    1. Re:Cult Suicides? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Were there any obscure cults waiting for something like this? One similar to Heaven's Gate perhaps?

      I doubt anyone will commit suicide over this comet, since there's no spaceship with it this time.

  6. Why? by squoozer · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Does anyone have any idea why this comet has suddenly got so much brighter? Presumably it is flying past a star but surely it would do this on a fairly regular basis.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:Why? by jamie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, the only star it's flying near is the big yellow one you see in the daytime. I haven't seen anything about the reason it got brighter, but my guess would be it has an icy core that has been gradually heating internally as it orbited closer to the sun, until suddenly it burst out as steam. If that's the case, maybe it'll get brighter as it gets closer and warmer... or maybe the lid's been taken off the pot and after a day of spewing a ton of stored-up H2O now it'll settle down and get dimmer.

      (Like a balloon when something bad happens!)

    2. Re:Why? by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does anyone have any idea why this comet has suddenly got so much brighter? Presumably it is flying past a star but surely it would do this on a fairly regular basis.

      Comets appear bright because they start to evaporate as they approach the sun, and the sun illuminates the evaporating gas and dust.

      The best guess as to why this one has suddenly brightened so much is that it has either broken apart or experienced a sudden outgassing for some other reason.

      BTW, the comets we see are gravitationally bound to our solar system, so the only star they ever come close to is Sol.

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    3. Re:Why? by bugg_tb · · Score: 0

      I hope it not flying past a star at that distance I doubt you'd be able to see it. :)

      It may fly in front of a star but that wont make any real difference, its more likely to be a larger amount of gas and other material being ejected from its core as it gets closer to our Sun.

    4. Re:Why? by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      The reason thought most likely is that the core has broken up, so this may turn out to be the comet's last trip around the sun as anything other than a cloud of rocky fragments.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    5. Re:Why? by ObiWanStevobi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously, It's coming right for us!

    6. Re:Why? by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      It got brighter because it's firing retro rockets that'll put it on a collision course with Earth in 2012. /it would be soooo screwed up if I were right.

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's just plain crazy, but it could be a huge electric discharge because of the charge difference between the comet and the surrounding space. At least, that's what the Electric Universe people would have you believe.

      Versus an increase in temperature.

    8. Re:Why? by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

      Flying past a star? Stars are too far apart for us to see anything flying between them. Even at the speed of light, it takes years to go between even the closest of star systems. Comets are small hunks of ice and dirt, orbiting our star in unusual orbits originating in a cloud of cold gunk way beyond the planets. More likely, it's physical composition was disrupted somehow, causing it to be more volatile.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    9. Re:Why? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Well, at least we still have nearly a thousand years of ice left in Halley's Comet, thus solving our global warming problems once and for all.

    10. Re:Why? by wximagery95 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does anyone have any idea why this comet has suddenly got so much brighter?

      Global warming.

    11. Re:Why? by Little+Susie · · Score: 1

      But...

    12. Re:Why? by Xonstantine · · Score: 1

      It's all Bush's fault.

    13. Re:Why? by jamie · · Score: 1

      ONCE AND FOR ALL!

    14. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nope. This comet made its closest approach to the sun back in May. It's now moving away from the sun. It also follows a relatively circular orbit compared to most bright comets, so significant changes in brightness are unexpected.

      However, there may have been an unusually large pocket of vapor that form some reason burst out at this point (out-gassing), or it might have been hit by a smaller object.

    15. Re:Why? by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Translation from dadkjasldjalskdjlas into English:

      Captain to bridge: I told you not to turn on the engines just yet, you bloody idiots. You have just blown our cover. Now everyone can see our drive plume...

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    16. Re:Why? by fatmal · · Score: 1

      I asked myself the exact same question - I'm no scientist, but my first thought was that the comet hit an atmosphere. I wonder if there are any instruments / measurements that could be taken to determine what that atmosphere is made up of?

  7. Nikes and Phenobarbital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in 3.. 2..

  8. Earth to comet: Y R U so late? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember a group of people waiting for you. Some 32 people in some large farm house or something in California. All wearing some kind of black clothing and Nike shoes. They took your promise to come in 1999 or so and committed suicide but you are coming so late. OK atleast the rest of the believers can now die and meet you.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Earth to comet: Y R U so late? by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      I remember a group of people waiting for you. Some 32 people in some large farm house or something in California. All wearing some kind of black clothing and Nike shoes. They took your promise to come in 1999 or so and committed suicide but you are coming so late. OK atleast the rest of the believers can now die and meet you. I can't take credit for the lyrics but they're still funny!

      Song Lyrics:
      Magic Comet Ride

      (Parody of Magic Carpet Ride by Steppenwolf)

      I like to dream
      Yes, yes
      About flying around in a space machine
      When a big blue ball appears in the night
      Our leader says that the time is right
      Hale Bopp draws near
      Clean the house and pack that gear

      Well, UFO is right behind
      Why don't you come with me, boys and girls
      On a magic comet ride
      Well, UFO's got a extra seat
      Why don't you take a trek with me?
      Beam us up, we'll visit ET

      Grab a ride, girl
      Say good bye, world
      Let Hale Bopp take you away

      Last night I packed a travel sack
      And said goodbye on video tape
      Before the ship could come for me
      Some witch doctor had to take my nuts away
      I donned a gown
      Brand new shoes from Niketown

      Well, you won't know if you stay behind
      Why don't you come with me, cyber geek
      On a magic comet ride
      We'll follow Doe and you will see
      Why don't you go to sleep with me?
      This plastic bag will set you free

      Say goodbye, world
      Log your last URL
      Let the ship take you away

      Well, UFO is right behind
      Why don't you come with me, boys and girls
      On a magic comet ride
      Well, UFO's got an extra seat
      Why don't you take a trek with me?
      Beam us up, we'll visit ET (Marcus Tee)
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    2. Re:Earth to comet: Y R U so late? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      That's so wrong, and yet so right...

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    3. Re:Earth to comet: Y R U so late? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      See also: KMFDM's "Witness". It isn't as lyrically strong, but the singer sounds eerily like they really mean it.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    4. Re:Earth to comet: Y R U so late? by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      I remember a group of people waiting for you. Some 32 people in some large farm house or something in California. All wearing some kind of black clothing and Nike shoes. They took your promise to come in 1999 or so and committed suicide but you are coming so late. OK atleast the rest of the believers can now die and meet you. Actually, they just arrived at the comet recently. It's a long trip through space, but they finally made it there. The comet exploded because they hit the wrong button when they started up the motor.
    5. Re:Earth to comet: Y R U so late? by amohat · · Score: 1

      I thought they were holed up in some mansion, paying $10k a month rent, paid for by developing web sites and other tech work.

  9. Doesn't matter by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 2, Informative

    What about in the UK? Where would I need to look to see this thing? I know /. is American centered but the world is a pretty big place and those of us not in that continent might like to know where we can/can't see things.
    It doesn't matter, it will be in the same place in the sky no matter where on Earth you are.
    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    1. Re:Doesn't matter by jimstapleton · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, Latitude+time-of-year will make a difference.

      But given that the UK and US are on the same hemisphere, that shouldn't be a problem, and if it is... Train + Rome...

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    2. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, almost - there should be a very small (measurable, but invisible to the naked eye as well as amateur telescopes) parallax. The general visibility however depends mostly on the latitude, so the UK, Mongolia, southern Russia as well as Canada and the northern USA should be essentially the same.

    3. Re:Doesn't matter by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      Chances are, if it is visible in Perseus from Japan and the US, it will still be visible in Perseus in the UK.

    4. Re:Doesn't matter by Riktov · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the sky will be in a different place above you depending on latitude.

    5. Re:Doesn't matter by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      This time of year, Perseus is visible all night from anywhere in the northern hemisphere. Since this is /., I should qualify that by saying you have to go outside to see it. The comet is bright enough to be naked-eye visible in even heavily light-polluted cities.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    6. Re:Doesn't matter by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      out... side?

      I'm not sure if I want to go to www.outside.com at work, never been there, and I don't want to get in trouble if it is NSFW.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    7. Re:Doesn't matter by bcattwoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but the sky will be in a different place above you depending on latitude.

      I am at 35.778889 N and the sky is up. Can you post your latitude and sky direction for comparison?
    8. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, you have to know what Perseus looks like so you can find it. You also have to know all the stars that are supposed to be in Perseus so you can know that the one that doesn't belong is the comet.

    9. Re:Doesn't matter by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I dunno what his latitude is, but he's obviously Australian. His sky must be down.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    10. Re:Doesn't matter by Spacezilla · · Score: 1

      You know how they say the world's a small place? Well, he was assuming that the world is an infinitely small place. :)

  10. Odd behavior by Muad'Dave · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to SpaceWeather.com, not only did the comet brighten unexpectedly, it "... has no tail, [and] a remarkable golden color ...". Unless the geometry of the sun-earth-comet trio is such that the tail is pointing directly away from the earth, you'd think there'd be a massive tail given the million-fold increase in brightness.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    1. Re:Odd behavior by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Of course, we won't see the tail because what They are not telling us is that it's headed directly for us - and that means that you of course won't see the tail, and we are all going to be extinct by next Friday!

      (In less paranoid mode, we've had a good long period of settled weather with nice clear skies. As soon as something new and interesting shows up in the sky? A week's unsettled cloudy weather is forecast! Typical.)

    2. Re:Odd behavior by Tmack · · Score: 1

      According to SpaceWeather.com, not only did the comet brighten unexpectedly, it "... has no tail, [and] a remarkable golden color ...". Unless the geometry of the sun-earth-comet trio is such that the tail is pointing directly away from the earth, you'd think there'd be a massive tail given the million-fold increase in brightness.

      More proof that its no comet, but a spaceship firing retro rockets!

      Tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    3. Re:Odd behavior by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, NASA is readying two shuttles right now, and Ben Affleck and Bruce Willis are on the way to the Cape as we speak...

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re:Odd behavior by khallow · · Score: 1

      Recall that the comet used to be magnitude 18. It doesn't "have" a tail because you can't see that initial tail. I wouldn't be surprised if it takes some time for the material currently being ejected to sort into a tail. The solar wind has low density and this pulse of material initially will have a relatively high density. It will get blown out into a tail over time.

    5. Re:Odd behavior by dintech · · Score: 1

      has no tail

      That's because it's obscured. It's coming right for us!

    6. Re:Odd behavior by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just a few facts to ruin the joke.
      -If a comet is heading directly for us, don't worry. If it is heading where we will be by the time it gets there, on the other hand...
      -The comet tail is almost not related to its trajectory, but mostly to the direction of the solar wind hitting it, you can approximately draw a line Sun->comet->tail.

      So odds are that if we ever have to collide with a comet, we will most likely be idealy placed to see its tail just before the collision.

    7. Re:Odd behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given its orbit, and given that a tail pretty much has to point away from the sun, it would be hard to get a geometry that WOULDN'T point the tail more or less straight away from the Earth.

    8. Re:Odd behavior by TexVex · · Score: 1

      "... has no tail, [and] a remarkable golden color ..."
      Maybe those Heaven's Gate folk drank the Kool-Aid for the wrong comet!
      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    9. Re:Odd behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't Worry, It's just the retros kicking in...

      I for one Welcome Our Galactic OverLords!!!

    10. Re:Odd behavior by cmacb · · Score: 1

      As soon as something new and interesting shows up in the sky? A week's unsettled cloudy weather is forecast!

      I think that's because They also control the weather. As the comet gets closer They will all retreat to their underground shelters and the skys will clear up. We should be able to see the comet in all its glory for at least a few hours before it hits.
    11. Re:Odd behavior by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      So odds are that if we ever have to collide with a comet, we will most likely be idealy placed to see its tail just before the collision.


      While I agree with the rest of your post, is this really true? It seems to me that with the eccentricity of comet orbits, if we do hit one, it will likely be crossing the Earth's orbit at an extreme angle, and thus the Earth -> Comet line of sight will be at a narrow angle to the Sun -> Comet -> Tail line.

    12. Re:Odd behavior by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      (In less paranoid mode, we've had a good long period of settled weather with nice clear skies. As soon as something new and interesting shows up in the sky? A week's unsettled cloudy weather is forecast! Typical.) From TFA, a description of what you'd see.

      The bright inner coma seems displaced off-center toward position angle 315. The inner coma opens up into a fan toward position angle 300, and I have noticed one ripple, akin to the hoods/ripples seen in Comet Hale-Bopp ten years ago. The coma is uniform in brightness

      Then again, that's what I see from any space object I try to look at in my poorly collimated Newtonian.
    13. Re:Odd behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lack of tail could also be due to Sun flares - which discovered recently by NASA, tear the tail of comets....i think there is a video on CNN/You Tube.

    14. Re:Odd behavior by BenBoy · · Score: 1

      As noted elsewhere, while it's a good joke, the tail direction isn't dependent on the direction of travel ...

      Exhaust from the braking rockets, on the other hand ...

    15. Re:Odd behavior by Agripa · · Score: 1

      . . . it will likely be crossing the Earth's orbit at an extreme angle, and thus the Earth -> Comet line of sight will be at a narrow angle to the Sun -> Comet -> Tail line.

      It could just as easily hit us when traveling away from the sun in which case the tale would come first and extend through our position.
  11. WARNING by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    The comet is now readily visible to the naked eye.

    WARNING
    Do not look into the comet with your remaining eye.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:WARNING by R2.0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      A coworker bought a balisong (butterfly knife) as a youth, and being a methodical chap, bought "The Balisong Book", or somesuch.

      The instructions started out with "First, take off the blade of the knife prior to practicing, or you will cut yourself". Being young and cocky, he ignored it and started playing with it. After cutting his hand rather badly, he decided to consult the book again.

      The next line read "Now that you have bandaged your hand, tape off the knife edge like the previous instructions said".

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    2. Re:WARNING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And watch out for large walking plants.

    3. Re:WARNING by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      The goggles! They do nothing!

    4. Re:WARNING by MeditationSensation · · Score: 1

      The previous instruction said to remove the blade, not tape it.

    5. Re:WARNING by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      That was a typo - I intended to write "tape off".

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  12. Re:Start the Search for the New Messiah! by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Funny

    If that dumbas folk singer is to be believed, he'll be found on a bus. Just like one of us. Depends on the singer you're listening to. Mine says he was born in a cheap hotel at the end of Route 66, he lived a dark and twisted life and came right back just to do it again.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  13. Re:Start the Search for the New Messiah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call the frankincense ....

  14. o omen! by OglinTatas · · Score: 0, Redundant

    O! What horrible calamity doth this portend?

    1. Re:o omen! by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

      I think it means that the Avatar's discorporated one of the Shadowlords. Two more to go!

    2. Re:o omen! by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 1

      perhaps the impending doom of a cataclysmic event triggered by a slashdot 10-year party. so many nerds in one place.... definitely cataclysmic.

      --
      sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
  15. It's The COMET EMPIRE!!! by saudadelinux · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where's the Argo/Yamato? Tell 'em to power up the Wave Motion Gun to deal with this intergalatic menace!

    --
    I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
    1. Re:It's The COMET EMPIRE!!! by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      For those of us that got the reference, I highly suggest "Vorpal Blade", by John Ringo and Travis Taylor. http://www.webscription.net/chapters/1416521291/1416521291.htm?blurb

      Baen Books still the best ebook deal on the planet - cheaper than the paperback, multiple formats available, and NO DRM!

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  16. Re:Start the Search for the New Messiah! by yakmans_dad · · Score: 1

    You slander Joan Osborne, an excellent r&b singer, and the song's writers. The notion has a good pedigree.


    Stephen jerked his thumb towards the window, saying:
    - That is God.
    Hooray! Ay! Whrrwhee!
    - What? Mr Deasy asked.
    - A shout in the street, Stephen answered, shrugging his shoulders.

  17. Roger MacBride Allen knows why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps it was shot at by the Farside Cannon :)

    http://www.sfreviews.net/farsidecannon.html

  18. Weather or not. by russotto · · Score: 1

    so get out your finest optics (even if it's just your eyes) and go comet watching!"


    It's raining and overcast here, you insensitive clod!

    (and always is for any significant astronomical phenomenon)
    1. Re:Weather or not. by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Heh. After I heard about this yesterday, a storm blew in and it started snowing here. It wasn't until 5am (MDT) that the clouds parted just enough to give me a view of it. That's when I posted the story.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Weather or not. by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      It's raining and overcast here, you insensitive clod! Better weather than we've got 'round these parts. It's raining ash here right now. Guess it could be worse... at least my town isn't on fire.

      Greetings from sunny... er, smokey Southern California! We've got different seasons, honestly... there's Flooding, Sunny, Hot, and On Fire!
      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  19. Magnitude scale incorrect on Wikipedia? by RandoX · · Score: 1

    I'm not familiar with the scale used to measure magnitude so I looked it up in Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apparent_magnitude Can anyone explain to me why it goes -1.7, -0.7, 0, -0.24, 3, 4.6...?

    1. Re:Magnitude scale incorrect on Wikipedia? by Bob54321 · · Score: 1

      My guess is wikipedia has a mistake. Unlikely I know, but there have been rumors of one or two cases of misinformation previously. Well at least that link clear up why going from 18 to 2.8 is getting brighter.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    2. Re:Magnitude scale incorrect on Wikipedia? by Myrano · · Score: 5, Informative

      Magnitude is a log scale, with brighter objects having lower magnitudes. Like so much in astronomy, the reason is historical: when the first guy (Greek, probably) decided to categorize stars by brightness he said the brightest stars should be first magnitude, the next brightest second, and so on. Because of the nature of the human eye, the scale is logarithmic. Objects brighter than what this guy considered first magnitude thus have a magnitude of less than one, or even less than zero.

      The numbers are funny (rather than -1, 0, 1, 2) because they're giving you sample objects so you can get an idea about the range of the scale.

      Hope that helped!

    3. Re:Magnitude scale incorrect on Wikipedia? by RandoX · · Score: 1

      I get that, but why is -0.24 between 0 and 3?

    4. Re:Magnitude scale incorrect on Wikipedia? by Myrano · · Score: 1

      Oh, right. That's just a mistake. I completely missed that... sorry. I really should be more careful about reading stuff... I thought it was enough to RTFA, but I guess I need to RTFCTIATRT (comment that I'm about to reply to) as well. For the record, it appears that Saturn's max brightness has an apparent magnitude of around -0.3, so it's that it's out of place on the table rather than off by a minus sign.

  20. Juloes Verne... by kcdoodle · · Score: 1

    I hope it comes close enough to hitch a ride!

    Read Jules Verne "Off on a Comet", at Gutenburg

    Decent story if you can get past the antisemitism.

    Best of all -- it's free (as in beer and in speech).

    --

    - I live the greatest adventure anyone could possibly desire. - Tosk the Hunted
    1. Re:Juloes Verne... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Best of all -- it's free (as in beer and in speech).


      You keep using this term. I don't think it means what you think it means.

  21. Re:Start the Search for the New Messiah! by Lane.exe · · Score: 1

    I once wrote a short story about Jesus living his life in a cheap motel on the edge of Route 66. It was dark and twisted.

    --
    IAALS.
  22. hale bopp large? bright? yoiu're joking, right? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:hale bopp large? bright? yoiu're joking, right? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      do not scale drawing

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:hale bopp large? bright? yoiu're joking, right? by Firehed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm pretty sure you get the first in Final Fantasy VII. In fact, I'd put five bucks on that tower in the middle to be the clock tower in Kalm. /must dig out the PS1 and play another fifty times

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    3. Re:hale bopp large? bright? yoiu're joking, right? by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure those would help. Then we would have to deal with the "War on Comets".

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    4. Re:hale bopp large? bright? yoiu're joking, right? by griffman99h · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are forgetting about the major increase of light pollution in modern life. Up until electric power, it was pretty dark out at night. just looking at a clear sky with no moon was enough to create awe in the eyes of superstitious. and those comets that look faint in our skies today had tails that span the horizon. unless we have a moon sized comet heading REALLY close to us. I doubt you'll get the war ending awe that was common back in the day. they are just not going to be as impressive in our polluted skies. But don't stop dreaming on my account.

  23. Er, where? by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...high in the sky and ideal for viewing at this time of year.

    On what part of the planet? Northern hemosphere or southern? The Americas or Asia? What time of night (or day)?

    In 1974, the American media were excitedly predicting a very bright comet named Kahoutek, and then when it appeared wrote how dissapointing the show was, that it wasn't even visible.

    I was in Thailand that year, Kahoutek drowned out all the stars in half the sky there.

    Some of you folks need to learn that the internet is a global phenomena and not restricted to your own country. Is this thing visible in my country (US)? What part of the sky, and what time? If I can see it, people in Australia can't.

    -mcgrew

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:Er, where? by Ogive17 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I blame Rob Malda for living in Michigan.. seriously.. how f'n dare he create a blog that deals with news that affects him... he's such an ignorant American.

      Get over your superiority complex because you've travelled around the world. Guess what, I've been to S. American twice... you know what they talk about on the news... local items! The only time I saw anything about the US was when I was watching ESPN from the hotel. Who would've guessed the media in a certain country typically focuses on that country.

      Most people on /. are smart enough to figure out the details for viewing this comment on their own. There's no reason the story needs to hold everyone's hand.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    2. Re:Er, where? by Riktov · · Score: 1

      The summary says it's in the constellation Perseus. If you can figure out where Perseus is, there are simple ways to figure out when and where you'll be able to see it from your location.

      On the other hand if you don't know where Perseus is, no amount of additional information will help you find the comet.

    3. Re:Er, where? by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      On what part of the planet? Northern hemosphere or southern? The Americas or Asia? What time of night (or day)?

      This link (which is right in the summary) give you all the answers you seek...

      But basically, if you can see Perseus, you can see the comet. It's visible from the northern hemisphere. Asia/America doesn't really matter... wait till your part of the world is in the dark and look up.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    4. Re:Er, where? by papasui · · Score: 1

      Fuck man you are too old to be on this website.

    5. Re:Er, where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, this is the first time I heard such a thing from a USian. Normally, it works the other way round.

    6. Re:Er, where? by c0rN_g0aT · · Score: 1

      Did you RTFA?

      Probably not since all the information that you need is in it.

      The latitude is given and that pretty much tells you the hemisphere.

      The times are in UT so that pretty much tells the time of day.

      They even give you the constellation to look for it in.

      I have no idea why you got a +3 for your post.

    7. Re:Er, where? by Don853 · · Score: 1

      I'm curious how that worked, since unless the comet was only bright during a 12 hour window it shouldn't have been any more visible in Thailand than America. TFA also mentions that the comet was viewed in Barcelona, New Mexico, and Yokohama, and explicitly states that it should be visible in the entire northern hemisphere.

    8. Re:Er, where? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Look, dweeb, the only people I have a superiority complex about is dorks like you who make stupid, assinine assumptions. I was in Thailand because I was in the Air Force at the time, and they sent me there.

      Youor proctologist called - he found your head.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    9. Re:Er, where? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I get younger every day. Back when I was regularly contributing to K5 someone once said "how can someone who has teenagers rant like one?"

      Once a nerd, always a nerd. Niel Armstrong once said "I alwasy was and always will be, a pocket protector wearing nerd." The only pocket calculators that existed when I went to high school took a three story building to house, so I cheated in math class with a slide rule.

      This little bit of nerd history might be of interest to you. What, pray tell, is the maximum slashdot age? ;)

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    10. Re:Er, where? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I think it was because the ocmet was so far south. Thailand is almost on the equator, and IIRC (but I've slept since then) the comet was to the southeast.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    11. Re:Er, where? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      RTFA? You must be new here ;)

      As to the +3, today's moderators seem to all be hung over or something (and I probably forgot to check the "no karma bonus" box). I saw a whole bunch of comments that were on topic that made me LOL and were modded "offtopic".

      Or maybe some of my old fans have found me, I've been in hiding for a while.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    12. Re:Er, where? by kramulous · · Score: 1

      What, pray tell, is the maximum slashdot age?
      Is that including or excluding any travel with speeds relative to c?
      --
      .
    13. Re:Er, where? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      You, sir, get the nerd award for the day! Excellent.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  24. needs to be ZOMG end of world by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    for those who operate under the fear of god, you need to make them afraid

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  25. Thermal pulse by mdsolar · · Score: 5, Informative

    This comet orbits between 2.2 and 5.2 AU and it's last closest approach to the Sun was in May, 2007: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17P/Holmes. An AU is the average distance between the Sun and the Earth.

    Comet crusts, the dark stuff that is left over after the ice sublimates, are thought to conduct heat slowly. One theory on why we see outbursts as comets move away from the Sun, as this one is doing, is that the warming pulse from the closest approach takes time to sink down to a reservior of carbon monoxide gas which then sublimate internally and blows off fairly large chunks of the comet. Another theory is that the same thermal pulse reaches a reservior of amorphous water ice, which is more common in space than crystalline ice and thus might be present in comets since their formation. When amorphous ice is warmed, it will become crystalline and release energy because the ordered state of crystaline ice is a lower energy state. This can lead to a chain reaction of further crystallization and energy release that could lead to enough warming to cause sublimation in the interior and then do the same kind of thing as in the carbon monoxide scenario.
    --
    Get your power from the Sun for what you already pay now: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users-selling-solar.html

  26. needs to be wrath of god impressive by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    needs to be arcing the entire sky

    then the bastards who kill in the name of god will be suitably humbled in their superstitious minds

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:needs to be wrath of god impressive by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Maybe they would see it as approval of their killing.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  27. Ill watch by Anon-Admin · · Score: 1

    Ill have time this weekend, I think ill get the telescope out and see what I can see.

    It is always fun to check out new objects that show up in the sky. ;)

  28. Re:Start the Search for the New Messiah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "It was a dark and twisted night..."

  29. Unexpected Sudden Brightening? by clickety6 · · Score: 4, Funny



    You think that's unexpected?

    Wait until it suddenly changes direction!

    Now thatwill be unexpected!

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    1. Re:Unexpected Sudden Brightening? by witte · · Score: 1

      Note to self : don't forget to bring a towel.

    2. Re:Unexpected Sudden Brightening? by PygmyShrew · · Score: 0

      Wait until it suddenly changes direction!
      Now that will be unexpected! Not any more
      --
      I've had the theme tune to Quantum Leap going through my head all day... Now you have, too!
    3. Re:Unexpected Sudden Brightening? by Alsee · · Score: 5, Funny

      You think that's unexpected?
      Wait until it suddenly changes direction!


      Oh yeah? You think that's unexpected?

      Wait until it starts an Inquisition!

      Now that will be unexpected!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  30. Mothership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The gold color indicates it is the mothership returning from Zeta Reticuli. Prepare to meet our reticuluous overlords!

  31. Edit by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    That should be "reservior of carbon monoxide ice"

  32. I got a photo of it through my telescope by yeremein · · Score: 5, Interesting

    here. There was no visible tail, just a fuzzy circle.

  33. Wow! A once in a lifetime event! by east+coast · · Score: 3, Funny

    So that's why it's going to be cloudy over my area for the foreseeable future?

    Never fails.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:Wow! A once in a lifetime event! by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

      Count yourself as lucky, here it's too smoky to see more then the brightest stars, and thats an improvment over the last few days.

    2. Re:Wow! A once in a lifetime event! by mentaldrano · · Score: 1

      It's just like Comcast internet access - the packets come from far away and get blocked at the last mile. Damn you Comcast, for ruining my cometwatching!

    3. Re:Wow! A once in a lifetime event! by Mark_Uplanguage · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I thought. Life's a bitch sometimes

      --
      "The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." -- Albert Einstein
    4. Re:Wow! A once in a lifetime event! by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      For the last 32 hours (Tuesday was actually pretty clear), I've only been able to see one star. It's normally yellow but now it's red.

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
  34. THAT'S what that is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Was wondering what that gold stationary object I was seeing after 9pm just between those 2 trees was.

    Knew it wasn't a planet as none of them seem gold, and planets tend to move with the sky...

    Good to know that I can recognize new objects at night without having to be informed of them, prior.

    1. Re:THAT'S what that is! by adastragrl · · Score: 1

      It would have moved with the stars... What direction were you facing? In the Northern Hemisphere, Perseus is a constellation that is rising in the northeast in the later evening hours (~9pm). This comet is within our solar system so it's closer than the stars of Perseus, but in front of them (hence why we say look towards Perseus). And since the comet is relatively nearby, it will exhibit motion over several nights, ie, you will notice that it changes position relative to the stars. But during the course of one night, it will move with the stars.

  35. Red Sox blowout Rockies 13 to 1 by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    This portends the collapse of the National League. The curse of the Bambino is lifted in spades!

    1. Re:Red Sox blowout Rockies 13 to 1 by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      To be perfectly fair, they're playing against a team that most people have never even heard of.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    2. Re:Red Sox blowout Rockies 13 to 1 by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      And to be perfectly, fair it would also be keeping with the team's history to continue the next two games in a similar fashion, and then choke on final four, losing to a team that nobody had ever heard of.

      And naturally, there will be riots in regardless of whichever team wins the series.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    3. Re:Red Sox blowout Rockies 13 to 1 by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      Ominous times... Ominous times....

    4. Re:Red Sox blowout Rockies 13 to 1 by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

      And to be perfectly, fair it would also be keeping with the team's history to continue the next two games in a similar fashion, and then choke on final four, losing to a team that nobody had ever heard of.

      And naturally, there will be riots in regardless of whichever team wins the series. Um, I believe you may be talking about the wrong American League team.
      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    5. Re:Red Sox blowout Rockies 13 to 1 by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      See... See.... 2 to 1.

    6. Re:Red Sox blowout Rockies 13 to 1 by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      Past performance is not an indicator?...

  36. Another Explanation? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    It's firing at us?

    --
    -Styopa
  37. Great scale by sacrilicious · · Score: 2, Funny
    literally a million times brighter, going from magnitude 18 to 2.8.

    Dr Evil: ... and so we will demand... one million dollars! (*laughs evilly*)
    Henchman: Um, well, it turns out that a million dollars isn't so much money any more.
    Dr Evil: Hmm. In that case... we will demand... fifty cents!!!

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  38. Praxis Explosion?? by Mr.+BS · · Score: 1

    Klingon High Command to Starfleet...Nothing to see here... move along!

  39. All Hail! by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 1

    All Hail Galactus, Devourer of Worlds!

    1. Re:All Hail! by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

      Everyone is saying how Radd it was when the comet was Heralded. The danger will be Fantastic, but hopefully Ultimately it will be Nullified.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
  40. Regarding Joan Osborne... by StressGuy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I was never a big fan of the stuff she did that made the radio...but just about everything else I heard from her was pretty amazing. I wonder what ever happened to her?

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Regarding Joan Osborne... by nilbud · · Score: 0

      She married Jackie Browles.

      --
      never let a man put his dirty how-do-you-do into your bajingo
  41. You forget the heat waves by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    That instantly parch a country that has been soaking the rest of the year, apparently not enough rain falls in the UK to fill the reservoirs enough for those short periods of dryness.

    It is kinda amazing this country once ruled the world. Says a lot about the world really.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:You forget the heat waves by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Two things:

      1) The amount of water lost through leaking pipes in London in one day is equivalent to what would come out of your hosepipe if you left it running for two hundred years;

      2) Since privatisation, the water companies have been quietly selling off reservoirs for property developers to build houses on. Higher demand, lower supply. It's not hard to see where that leads.

      They'd like you to think it's your fault. It isn't.

    2. Re:You forget the heat waves by miasmic · · Score: 1

      People don't realise, because it rains so often, that the total average annual rainfall in the UK (at least in the south and east of England) is actually very low on a global scale - this misleading impression comes from the frequency of times when it's drizzling/spitting or just damp and overcast, it is, compared to other countries, very rare to get heavy monsoon style rain which can put down a months worth of drizzling rain in one day. In fact the average annual rainfall in Eastern England is similar to that found in a lot of desert areas, just those areas are closer to the equator and the rain falls more heavily on less occasions. When you realise this, it's not so hard to understand why we have hosepipe bans etc. For comparison, where I am living now on the South Island of New Zealand has six times the average rainfall of where I am from in the UK, but it actually seems less rainy here (much higher sunshine hours).

  42. Blindsight, anyone? by antifret · · Score: 1
    --
    Terminate and stay resinous.
    1. Re:Blindsight, anyone? by trongey · · Score: 2, Funny

      You realize, of course, that being able to make a connection to a Sci-Fi book that was just published last year means your chances of ever getting a date are pretty much non-existent.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    2. Re:Blindsight, anyone? by antifret · · Score: 1

      even for /. that's a yawneriffic attempt at repartee

      --
      Terminate and stay resinous.
    3. Re:Blindsight, anyone? by trongey · · Score: 1

      even for /. that's a yawneriffic attempt at repartee
      Since this is /. I'll consider that a compliment.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    4. Re:Blindsight, anyone? by antifret · · Score: 1

      If anything about linking this news item to Blindsight will invalidate my date chances, it'll be the fact that after I posted this I realized the astronomical object from that novel that I was really thinking of was the unknown x-ray emitter they called Big Ben, not the BC comet (which was the decoy to throw us off from noticing BB...I should just quit, girls may be reading this. Wait, it's /. (obg. yawneriffic comment #3)

      --
      Terminate and stay resinous.
    5. Re:Blindsight, anyone? by m0nkyman · · Score: 1

      And recognizing the connection makes it completely non-existent...

      --
      ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
    6. Re:Blindsight, anyone? by iogan · · Score: 1

      Blindsight is available online, too.

  43. Iilligal aliens anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [and] a remarkable golden color Probably our local space cops. As we all know Gold is the fastest color, and can only be used by the Space Cops. Welcome to Dirt!

    (Sorry, obscure reference to Illegal Aliens http://www.amazon.co.uk/Illegal-Aliens-Nick-Pollotta/dp/1587157969 I recently read).
  44. No, it's probably just Dahak again by PortWineBoy · · Score: 1

    taking out another million or two Aku'Ultan.

    --

    this sig deleted by another sig

    1. Re:No, it's probably just Dahak again by samwichse · · Score: 1

      I know David Weber is not ever going to win any awards for "great literature," but dang it if the man's books (especially the Dahak series) aren't a lot of fun to read.

      Sam

  45. Another explanation by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    has suddenly flared to be literally a million times brighter,

    It's the Silver Surfer! Aaaaah, we're all gonna die when the giant cloud-thing comes and eats our planet.

    Last call.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Another explanation by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 1

      It's his brother, the Gold Surfer. He usually hangs out at a gold farm.

  46. Drinks are on me by ackthpt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    We've got mixed drinks! Don't forget to put on your black shirts, sweatpants, Nikes and Away Team arm bands before going to bed!

    Valhalla's Gate, Valhalla's Gate, Valhalla's Gate, Valhalla's Gate, Valhalla's Gate, Valhalla's Gate, ufo, ufo, ufo, ufo, ufo, ufo, space alien, space alien, space alien, space alien, space alien, space alien, extraterrestrial, extraterrestrial, extraterrestrial, extraterrestrial, extraterrestrial, extraterrestrial, millennium, millennium, millennium, millennium, millennium, millennium, millennium, misinformation, misinformation, misinformation, misinformation, misinformation, misinformation, freedom, freedom, freedom, freedom, freedom, freedom, second coming, second coming, second coming, second coming, second coming, second coming, angels, angels, angels, angels, angels, angels, end times, end times, end times, end times, end times, end times, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, God, God, God, God, God, God

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  47. careful by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you don't have to believe in fairy tales about armageddeon

    but you should believe in the power of a bunch of assholes bringing about a self-realizing prophecy. that armageddeon is not true, but enough assholes believing in it makes it true

    so you are not safe from their thinking after all

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:careful by operagost · · Score: 1

      If only we could make readers of Slashdot safe from your "thinking".

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:careful by spun · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Making people safe from a type of thinking? Fuck you, Mr. mind-cop, I don't need you or anyone else to 'protect' me from thoughts.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:careful by mh1997 · · Score: 1

      Making people safe from a type of thinking? Fuck you, Mr. mind-cop, I don't need you or anyone else to 'protect' me from thoughts.
      I agree with you in that I don't need anyone to protect me from thoughts, but millions of people would disagree with you (me).

      I offer as evidence hate crime laws. It is not bad enough to kill someone, but the hate crime laws punish the reason (thoughts of the killer) behind the murder. My guess is that if you are murdered, that would be a bad day no matter what the motivation.

      Another example is the issue of school prayer. I believe in God and pray, also I am a parent and can make my child pray (as can other parents with their own children) and therefore influence the thoughts of my child. Why then would someone want to have laws enforcing school prayer? The answer is to control or at least influence the thoughts of your child - apparently it is not enough for some to control their children, they must also control the thoughts of your child.

      There are more examples, but what's the point, I will not change the mind of a single member of the thought police.

    4. Re:careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's what browsing at higher moderation levels is for.

    5. Re:careful by spun · · Score: 1

      Also, as for hate crimes, there was already a difference in the laws. Hate crimes are by definition premeditated, and as such already carried a greater penalty.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  48. When? by Riktov · · Score: 1

    The clock time during which a celestial object is in the sky on any day is essentially the same anywhere in the world. The angle of its path relative to the horizon, and thus rising and setting time, varies with latitude, but the time it reaches its highest point (zenith) in the sky will be at the same clock time. Just like the sun at noontime.

    Depending on latitude, its path through the sky may be entirely below the horizon and thus invisible. For example, the Little Dipper "rises", "sets", and "reaches zenith" in the sky of the Southern Hemisphere, but it does so all below the horizon, so it's invisible.

  49. Too Bad.... by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

    We are approaching a full moon right now, which is the absolute worst time to look for diffuse objects in the sky. :(

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  50. What a Brilliant Idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know there's probably an unknown natural, scientific explaination for the huge increase in magnitude but what if that isn't what's happened? I know some of us have put a lot of thought over the years into how to find other life "out there" (if there is any). SETI and those golden records are some great ideas but this is just brilliant! What better way to tell everyone, "Hey! We're over here!" Coming up with a way to increase a relatively innocent space body's magnitude in such a way would certainly get the attention of anyone looking into space especially considering its unprecendented occurrance, speed to "transmission" and relative "bandwidth" of communication.

    1. Re:What a Brilliant Idea! by Rub1cnt · · Score: 1

      Why does this suddenly remind me of Hotel California?

      --
      Remember, it's not paranoia if they really ARE out to get you... :)
  51. Clark Griswald by dunc78 · · Score: 1

    Most likely Clark Griswald just turned on his Christmas lights.

  52. It's Obvious by trongey · · Score: 2, Funny

    The comet hasn't brightened. What you're seeing is the afterglow from the nuclear explosion that Bruce Willis set off yesterday.

    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  53. What up, Holmes! by smackt4rd · · Score: 1

    Is this another one of those weird Astronomer jokes? lol

  54. Hangs in the air exactly the way gold bricks dont by netsavior · · Score: 1

    crap, did anyone go check the zoning laws for the inter-galactic freeway?

  55. Page Art Bell, Mr. Bell, please report to... by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

    Hey, another comet doing extraordinary things. Time for Art Bell to kill another cult of whackos-in-purple-shrouds.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  56. Same Hemisphere by Namlak · · Score: 1

    But given that the UK and US are on the same hemisphere...

    Aren't virtually *any* two places on the globe in the "same hemisphere"? :^P

    Yes, I know you meant "Northern hemisphere", but your post prompted the thought.

  57. In related news... by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

    In related news, Nobel Profit Of Doom, Al "The G in my name is for G Star" Gore, blames the brightening of the comet on global warming.

    "We are in serious jeopardy of losing all the comets and other galaxy bodies to global warming. I am declaring a Galaxy Emergency," the sometimes robotic, one-time Presidential candidate said."

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  58. Our new Overlords by kmahan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obviously a ship starting its deceleration burn.

    --
    Invalid Checksum. Retrying.
  59. you can do that by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you can offer, via your own comments that are superior to mine, a superior way of thinking. that would make slashdot safe from my thinking because you've given them a better option

    or, you could skulk underneath my comments, blubbering about how much i suck, to absolutely no effect at all, except perhaps as a demonstration that i have a sycophant

    (snicker)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  60. Is Anyone Listening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New Comet Heralds Warning to Humanity....Is Anyone Listening?

    Check this out: http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index888.htm

    Interesting stuff! Eh! Eh! Eh!

  61. Re:Start the Search for the New Messiah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Then maybe the brightness is due to the demon warp dealing... (whatever that means)... (He really writes some weird lyrics, dont he)

  62. Comet McNaught 2006 p1 by iamlucky13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This comet isn't exactly one to get hyped about. It's not that bright. Magnitude 3 is about as bright as the Little Dipper. You won't see it from the city and you have to know where to look to identify it from better conditions.

    Of course, naked eye comets always get a brief mention in the news, even when dim, but this one caught attention because of the dramatic increase in brightness. It's all the more surprising when you consider that this is a short period comet in a relatively circular orbit. It makes it's close approach to the sun frequently, so it doesn't tend to brighten much as it makes the approach, and it has no tail. Even more remarkable, it's currently moving away from the sun, so it would normally be expected to dim, not brighten. Why? Well, it may have had an unusual outgassing event or have impacted another object. Beyond that, I don't have any good guesses.

    The brightest comet in decades was McNaught, which made a show last winter. Unfortunately, it was very close to the sun, so it rose barely after sunrise and set barely after sunset and was therefore hard to observe. However, it quickly got brighter than Venus and eventually was so bright (M -6) that a clever observer in clear, dry air could spot it during the day, a scant few degrees from the sun.

    It was a little more friendly to observers in the southern hemisphere, and its huge, striated tail was spectacular. Here's a picture.

    Kohoutek wasn't all that bright. Probably the best observer's comet last century was Hale-Bopp, which was very photogenic and had a remarkable double tail. I wasn't alive for Halley, which has a lot of historical significance, but it's latest pass wasn't very impressive.

  63. Oh little star... by He+Who+Waits · · Score: 1

    And what rough beast, his hour come 'round at last, slouches toward ...er, Labrador... to be born?

  64. Don't you people remember the Triffids! by hbr · · Score: 1

    Bah - you deserve everything you get.

    1. Re:Don't you people remember the Triffids! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I'm storing up on sea water immediately!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  65. you give humanity too much credit by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    or rather, you don't understand humanity

    take the most advanced civilization you can imagine, as free form superstition and organized religion as can be, and still, the psychological effect on your behavior of a big "eye" looking down on you from the heavens would be quite extraordinary

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  66. A "Millionfold" is not the same as a Million times by N0GNU · · Score: 5, Funny

    The /. title "Comet Unexpectedly Brightens a Millionfold" demonstrates a common mistake.

      Each "fold" means a doubling, or 2 to the n'th power. For example, three-fold is 8-times. Take a piece of paper and fold it three times- unfold it and count the number of rectangles outlined by the creases. This is where the expression actually came from...

      People incorrectly use the "fold" term because they think it sounds more intelligent, but they demonstrate their ignorance by misusing it.

      A brighting of 2 to the millionth power would be so massive that we and our entire solar system would be almost instantly vaporized and blown away by the photons striking us.

    ron

  67. In other news: by Rub1cnt · · Score: 1

    New planet appears in northern sky, aliens claiming to be from the planet Crikkit contact government, promise to rain destruction on the universe as a whole. Set var=perilsensativesunglasses=1. Where's slaartibartfast and the starship Bistromath when we need them?

    --
    Remember, it's not paranoia if they really ARE out to get you... :)
  68. Comet, comet, go away, don't come back other day by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the comet reaches Earth it is a WMD.

  69. I think the Russians are behind this! by rholland356 · · Score: 1

    I think the Russians sneaked off a launch and lit up their own ion engine and have crashed a microwave-sized block of titanium into this comet. They were able to sneak off the launch by hiding the vessel in a fake third stage in the supply shot for the space station. With all the clutter up there, no one noticed the fake third stage slowly drift away a couple years ago.

    Yes, indeed. It was the Russians. Or the Chinese. Or India.

    Maybe Japan.

    Makes me ask--why wasn't it the USA? Because we are focused on sending people to the moon, which is a huge waste of effort and detracts from our development of robots and nanotech and the control of robots.

  70. Re:Start the Search for the New Messiah! by iogan · · Score: 1

    I think I saw the thing yesterday while my girlfriend was giving birth to our son.

  71. Did you forget? by Sir_Dill · · Score: 1
    McNaught aka The Great Comet of 2007
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_McNaught

    I don't think historically there has ever been a comet that has "eaten the sky".

    Old drawings show them as huge things in the sky, however we can't really accept that as a true measure of scale.

    Based on observations that have been made since photography was in widespread use, I doubt there has ever been a comet that has "swallowed the sky". Some impressive displays no doubt(Halley's, Hale-Bopp, McNaught) but thats about the extent.

  72. Re:A "Millionfold" is not the same as a Million ti by pan_piper · · Score: 1

    2 to the millionth power would be a gazillion times bigger than the universe would it not?

  73. Re:A "Millionfold" is not the same as a Million ti by Shadyman · · Score: 1

    Or roughly equivalent to a Jiggawatt, yes.

  74. Re:A "Millionfold" is not the same as a Million ti by N0GNU · · Score: 1

    2 to the millionth power would be a gazillion times bigger than the universe would it not? One is a measure of volume, the other of energy- but if all the mass in the universe were converted to energy, it might just work out to be pretty close... ;)

    ron
  75. kdawson, quit putting words in my mouth! by swordgeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm slightly appalled.
    I write up what I consider to be an interesting story for /. readers, check my grammar and links, and then click submit. Lo and behold, it gets accepted. Cool!

    Then I read what I supposedly wrote, and find that words have been put in my mouth. Specifically:

    "The comet still appears starlike even in binoculars but should grow to several arcminutes across over the next few nights. "

    I did NOT write that. I didn't suggest it. The comet does NOT appear starlike in binoculars at all--it's quite a clear extended disk. ONE person quoted in Sky & Telescope believes that it will expand to several arcminutes in size, but that's strictly conjecture.

    Furthermore, I didn't use the word "millionfold" in my subject line. That was kdawson again. /. editors: If you're going to actually edit submissions (and why start now, after ignoring fundamental grammatical errors and duplicate stories for a decade?) then get it right!

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  76. Friday and Saturday Night? by doopokko · · Score: 1

    I saw a very very bright object in the sky early in the morning on the 20th and again in the early hours of the 21st. It was far brighter than Sirrus. I tried looking at star charts to see what it could be. It seemed to be in the Canis Minor constellation, but was too bright to be Procyon. Does anyone know if what I saw might have been this comet?

    1. Re:Friday and Saturday Night? by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Probably not. Actually, absolutely not. On the 20th and 21st, the comet was about magnitude 17, which is invisible in anything less than a fair-sized telescope. Also, the comet is in Perseus.

      If you're in the northern hemisphere, it was likely Venus. Right now, it's spectacularly high and bright in the morning sky. I can see it until quite some time after sunrise.

      Take a look at it with binoculars--you should be able to make out a clear disk shape.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  77. Re:A "Millionfold" is not the same as a Million ti by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just to be clear on something, I never used the word millionfold in my submission. That was kdawson editing my post for his own glory.

    Incidentally, the term has been used both ways, and has etymologically distinct roots, so millionfold meaning 'a million times' is valid.
    I can't link directly to it, at the sixth entry (-fold) at Miriam Webster's.

    Nonetheless, it wasn't my word. Neither was the claim that the comet is 'starlike in binoculars.'

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  78. oblig starship troopers by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Funny

    Johnny Rico: I'm from Buenos Aires, and I say kill 'em all!

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  79. Re:A "Millionfold" is not the same as a Million ti by N0GNU · · Score: 1

    Incidentally, the term has been used both ways, and has etymologically distinct roots, so millionfold meaning 'a million times' is valid.
    I can't link directly to it, at the sixth entry (-fold) at Miriam Webster's.


      Now I'm looking at all this from a humorous point of view, so please don't take this wrong, but just because something is listed in a dictionary does not make it correct. They simply cite common (mis)usage of words.

    Case in point: The aforementioned website listing for the word http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/theory/ "theory" indicates it is a synonym for hypothesis, which is absolutely, deadly wrong. The layman misuse of scientific/mathematical terms is pretty frustrating. The meanings of the terms conjecture, hypothesis, and theory are are very distinct and do not overlap, there is no ambiguity here whatsoever.

      One of my favorite quotes from Babylon 5 is "If you can not say what you mean, you can never mean what you say". I try my best, but often do not succeed.

    ron

  80. Could it be Rama? by ceswiedler · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it's Rama?

  81. Re:A "Millionfold" is not the same as a Million ti by Alsee · · Score: 1

    A brighting of 2 to the millionth power would be so massive that we and our entire solar system would be almost instantly vaporized and blown away by the photons striking us.

    No it wouldn't.

    That much light would form a black hole.

    In fact not only would the event horizon swallow the solar system, it would engulf the entire universe. It's been a long time since I ran similar calculations, but as I recall out would only take two to the power of a couple hundred for the black hole to engulf the entire universe and then some. Two to the millionth power is big. It is almost infinitely beyond universe devouringly big. It's big. Big with a capital-B Broken Brain Big.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  82. Re:A "Millionfold" is not the same as a Million ti by lousehr · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ron, can't tell if you're joking or serious. If serious, cite your source.

    Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary Threefold \Three"fold`\, a. [OE. [thorn]reofald; cf. AS. [thorn]r[=i]feald.] Consisting of three, or thrice repeated; triple; as, threefold justice.

    http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/threefold threefold 1. three times as great 2. triple

    Similar definitions for twofold. Do the "fold" rules change after three?
  83. Where can it be seen? by damista · · Score: 1

    Do we poor fellas on the southern hemisphere miss out AGAIN or are we lucky for once? All the exciting stuff seems to happen on the northern hemisphere. I'm rather astronomically challenged, so I have no clue where to find Perseus and if it is even visible down here.

  84. Re:Start the Search for the New Messiah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, is your girlfriend a virgin?

  85. Nobody likes a math geek, Scully by jeko · · Score: 1

    And they like an etymology geek even less.

    Look it up. :-)

      -- the proud owner of a useless Lit degree

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  86. Re:A "Millionfold" is not the same as a Million ti by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    Well, I'd certainly never claim that a dictionary is always definitively correct--there are too many that don't agree with each other for that to be supportable. In this case though (-fold as a suffix), the etymology is quite clear, long, and well-established. The use of "fold" meaning "times " is both historically and etymologically sound. Curiously, it doesn't mention the powers-of-two usage, which is also common and correct--which points to your previous point about dictionaries being noncanonical. I'd like to dig through the OED on this one, just for the fun of it.

    Now on the other hand, I could have referenced the American Heritage dictionary, which would have thrown my arguments and also my personal character into complete disrepute. :-)

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  87. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I said Kahoutek wasn't that bright. I wasn't alive for it and it was supposedly spectacular. I confused it with Hayatuke.

  88. Perhaps it is coming closer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just hope the US o' A and The Rooskies don't heat it up.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eon_(novel)

  89. Re:A "Millionfold" is not the same as a Million ti by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you're right, but I think that word doesn't mean what you think it means (any longer).

    Kinda like spam.  In internet terms, it referred exclusively to Usenet abuse.  But we must all concede that it now refers to all things internet abuse-y.

  90. Nice diagram of where to look, but... by yellowstone · · Score: 1

    It omits the nearly full, nearly perigee moon that is so insanely bright you can't see another thing in the sky.

    Oh, well. I guess I'll look again Saturday or Sunday.

    --
    150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
    1. Re:Nice diagram of where to look, but... by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      True, the moon is insanely bright. However, even with mediocre skies from the middle of a city of a million people, WITH the nearly full moon, I was able to spot it naked-eye. Find Mirfak, scan across for delta-Persei (about three fingerwidths away with your arm held straight out), and then look up about half as far as the distance between them. If you can't see it, then grab some binoculars and it'll pop out quite vividly.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  91. Re:A "Millionfold" is not the same as a Million ti by kramulous · · Score: 1

    This is a problem with Web 2.0 technology. Wikipedia is not the be-all, end-all of definitions. It also depends on what discipline you are from. Mine, computational mathematics, says that in this case, Ron is correct.

    --
    .
  92. Dammit, Dammit, Dammit! by kramulous · · Score: 1

    Looking at the skyhound and there is one day left to see it. That will be in 10 hours time. The one day of the year it fucking rains in this 'arse-hole of the earth' country. Typical.

    --
    .
    1. Re:Dammit, Dammit, Dammit! by GBGraham · · Score: 1

      I just looked at the skyhound link and I don't see any speculation about it being visible for just one day (the last time it brightened, it was for weeks). I've seen it both yesterday and today and if anything, it looks like it has gotten a tad brighter. By the way, I'm tired of everyone claiming how mag 2/3 isn't that bright and that you won't be able to see it with the full Moon - wrong! From the Portland Suburbs with city lights, full moon, haze, it is clearly visible naked eye and rivals the brightest stars next to it. I just got in from viewing it through a 12" scope on our deck - nice star-like point at the center surrounded by a bright white,inner hood with a fainter, outer golden colored hood. I took a few photos with a Nikon D70 through the scope which give a pretty good idea of what it looks like visually through a small scope: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2076/1753913176_6fbd38b28d_o.jpg

  93. What the night sky *really* looks like by patio11 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nothing. Only when you get outside of civilization are you afflicted with the light pollution from stars hundreds of light years away. Don't worry, this pollution, while unsettling if you weren't expecting it, has no permanent ill effects and clears up again after you return to civilization.

  94. Re:Start the Search for the New Messiah! by doktorjayd · · Score: 1

    well, this is slashdot..

  95. Re:Jules Verne... by kcdoodle · · Score: 1

    Hmm.. Let's see.

    It doesn't cost anything == Free as in beer.

    I can use it, change it, republish it, however I want and I break no laws == Free as in speech.

    Clearly, I don't understand the saying, please explain.

    --

    - I live the greatest adventure anyone could possibly desire. - Tosk the Hunted
  96. Oblig. by mattr · · Score: 1

    That's no comet!

  97. Re:A "Millionfold" is not the same as a Million ti by lousehr · · Score: 1

    kramulous: Note I did not say that ron's definition was wrong, only that it didn't match the sources I checked. No, Wikipedia is not the final arbiter, and I checked (and cited) a more traditional source as well. My real point was that if one is going to make a statement about the wrongness of another's word use, one should back it up. Ron is not the "be-all, end-all" of definitions either. If you want people to learn, point them to useful resources.

  98. Re:A "Millionfold" is not the same as a Million ti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But is it as big as the xkcd number? (google it)