Slashdot Mirror


Is Apple Tracking iPhone Users Through IMEI?

ariefwn writes ""As I sit here applying a new layer of Reynolds tin foil to my international hat of conspiracy, its been proven that Apple tracks iPhone usage and tracks IMEI numbers of all their iPhones worldwide. Hidden in the code of the 'Stocks' and 'Weather' widgets is a string that sends the IMEI of your phone to a specialized URL that Apple collects. I wonder if there will be any implications to owners of hacked iPhones..."

218 comments

  1. Yes, and the problem is? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Informative

    You signed an agreement when you bought the device.

    When you interact with Apple, we may collect personal information relevant to the situation, such as your name, mailing address, phone number, email address, and contact preferences; your credit card information and information about the Apple products you own, such as their serial numbers and date of purchase; and information relating to a support or service issue.

    However people will expect this to be at manual support time and not all the time.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      And if someone got it off eBay?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by abaddononion · · Score: 1

      Well, the EULA I signed when I got Windows also says they'll monitor whatever information they want out of me. So, it's good to know that all of these companies monitoring all of my information is *completely* okay, and nothing to worry about!

      Of course, I dont use Windows anymore because of the EULAs. So Ill *also* continue not buying an iPhone, and everything will be fine.

    3. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Slashidiot · · Score: 0

      But, c'mon! Who cared about who signed what? I just wanted the iPhone, it's so cool!! Who reads what they sign anyway?? Apple is supposed to be good, no matter what we agreed on!

      --
      Tis women makes us love, Tis Love that makes us sad, Tis sadness makes us drink, And drinking makes us mad.
    4. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm that gives me an idea for wifi connection hand off between base stations using a browser add on.

    5. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by wattrlz · · Score: 5, Funny

      And if someone got it off eBay? In that case they can probably afford to sue.
    6. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run a pirated version of XP, and didn't sign any EULA :)

    7. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Also worth noting that all mobile providers track the usage of devices. All phones beacon with their unique identification info. Also most mobile service offed from third parties can / do collect unique identification information on the devices using their service.

      As pointed out earlier apple clearly states that they can \ will collect such info from any apple device . An ipod sends its info to apple every time is is synced on a new account.

      This is not new this is not news that matters. Move on nothing to see here at least nothing that we do not already know.

    8. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Barny · · Score: 1

      Then sue the person who sold it to you, duh.

      Same sort of problem as if a computer OEM doesn't give you the Microsoft EULA to peruse before running the pc for the first time.

      Btw OEM can actually bypass all that and just present the box ready to roll, they just have to put a sticker with about 20 lines of legalese on the invoice and get you to sign it (stating that you will read the EULA prior to operation), but I am guessing said e-tailer didn't do anything remotely like this.

      *sigh* another reason to love my nokia :)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    9. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Don't you have laws about abusing EULAs?

      I suppose something like "At any time you have your phone connected, we may use your signal to target a space war laser that will disintegrate you, and all other Apple products you might have on you at that moment." wouldn't fly in court.

      "The prolonged use of this phone may have adverse effects on your health, such as death."

    10. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by jamar0303 · · Score: 2

      Who said anyone signed anything? I know that my local reseller doesn't make me sign an agreement or anything- hand over the cash, put in the SIM, run Installer.app (iPhone comes pre-jailbroken for the user's convenience; I'll never buy Apple stuff anywhere else) to install what I want, and I'm good to go.

      One of the many upsides to buying an iPhone in China.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    11. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by cadeon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But you're still contributing to Microsoft's installed base, which isn't helping to fix the problem.

    12. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sick of this "you signed an agreement" bullshit.

      Such agreements are unconscionable and should not be upheld.

      Contract law is immoral.

    13. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by DustyShadow · · Score: 1

      Then sue the person who sold it to you, duh. If there is no clause in the contract between Apple and the guy who sold it to you on ebay that says he must notify subsequent users of the license, then there is nothing to sue that guy for. Second hand purchasers would not be a party to the contract that the first buyer agreed to. Thus, the second hand purchaser would be able to sue Apple for something they did illegal. I don't know if collecting this info is illegal though.
    14. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by tha_mink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You signed an agreement when you bought the device. I don't think anyone signed an agreement to publish their stock watching habits to Apple though. Name? Sure...Email? No problem...All the stocks I'm watching? Um...no.
      --
      You'll have that sometimes...
    15. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by magarity · · Score: 1

      we may use your signal to target a space war laser that will disintegrate you
       
      It's OK; I've remodulated my shields to match the frequency of their laser.

    16. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Worminater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      do you think possibly he has a different phone than you? an n95 possibly? Or maybe you already climbed back under your bridge.

    17. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

      Let's see. Get all the cookies off your computers, and "don't accept cookies" on your browser, and watch the functionality go down. Throw off all scripting languages, too, because they can be hacked. Don't connect to the Internet. Put on a tinfoil hat so the rays won't get you. And live in a Faraday cage. Safe!

    18. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by ardin,mcallister · · Score: 1

      Ipod's only give that info if you sync them with itunes. If you use Amarok or Rhythmbox or GTKPod, you won't send any info in.

      --
      "Some men just want to watch the world burn..."
    19. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by DECS · · Score: 1

      Since you can't use the iPhone without a service plan, you'd have to set up service in order to be put in the terrifying position of sending your mobile's address to Apple's servers to obtain information service updates.

      There is no crisis involving second hand sales, because owning the hardware does not result in the panic and fretted about in the post. It's only reason for CONCERN if you sign up for service, at which time you have to walk through the EULA trapdoor yourself.

      Concern is the new fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Most people with Grave Concerns love Apple and own all of its products. But lately, they've just been very, very concerned. Things don't add up, and its all very frightening. In most cases, the safest thing is to run back to Microsoft, where at least you know you're being spied upon every two weeks with Window Genuine Advantage. Nothing to worry about.

      Steve Jobs Ends iPhone SDK Panic

    20. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      But the helpful internet ad says my computer is broadcasting an IP address! We're all doomed!

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    21. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by DECS · · Score: 1

      Part of the reason for bullshit legalese in EULAs and other warnings is to cover the asses of technology companies that are regularly sued over frivolous nuisance cases because people--and particularly Americans--reserve the right to be morons and expect companies to bail them out after doing moronic things.

      By putting disclaimers in a long winded EULA, the consumer at least knows the extend to which the company may go. The alternative to an EULA claiming an agreement that allows a vendor to exchange and collect specific kinds of data would be either not having any clue of possibilities, or not having access to features that might outweigh potential issues.

      Do you want the government controlling what services a vendor can offer? Do you want to have no warnings at all? It sounds like you want to have everything with no personal accountability and yet retail the rights to mount frivolous lawsuits over bullshit. Incidentally, that's also why you have to live in a world of bullshit legalese.

      Ten Myths of Leopard: 10 Leopard is a Vista Knockoff!

    22. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Barny · · Score: 1

      E65 actually, N95s lesser known little cousin.

      Slide phone, 802.11b/g (have got a SMB client on it), 2mp camera and with coreAVC will play any type of video no probs.

      Yeah I could have spent an extra $200-300AU on the N95, but really didn't need to :)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    23. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by dniq · · Score: 1

      When I check weather or stocks, I don't interact with _Apple_. I interact with _my_ phone, and with the web site, which provides me with the information. There's absolutely no reason for them to have my IMEI number. Interaction with Apple would be if I visit their web site, or store, or whatever else is directly associated with the company. Neither weather nor stocks are.

    24. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Swift2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and who cares about that totalitarianism stuff. At least your iPhone is free!

    25. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Because, y'know, it's totally impossible to learn what a country's doing right without picking up its bad habits too.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    26. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by elguappo · · Score: 1

      Filter thru all the opinions and what it comes down to is the ability to track our uses. I don;t care if a cphone company knows that I own a number and that number is used with this phone. And this phone has called this number 5 times...They still do not know what the hell I'm talking about on these calls. The issue is if this TRACKING technique is added to say.....Calendar, or Contacts or Safari. People have to realize that Apple is leading on this type of infringement on personal privacy. Best decision is to not buy an iPhone. As much as I liked mine, the lack of consistant video playback..ringtone limitations, ATnT EDGE network suxs and no wireless made my decision easy. Add this unexpected accessory of going beyond necessary tracking and selling the iPhone was a good decision.

    27. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And live in a Faraday cage. Safe!

      I do, I do, but the reception on my iPhone is terrible here! Damn lousy Apply hardware.

    28. Re:Yes, and the problem is? by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      You should be safe, then. Unless they use some kinda of photon particle beam, in which case you'll need actual physical protection.

      --
      Your ad here.
  2. Just a few more minutes... by mattgreen · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm waiting for someone to respond with an eight page analysis of why this isn't really a big deal, complete with immaculate formatting and excellent grammar. Then everyone simply looks at the length of the post and says, "aha! see, it ISN'T a problem! Not that I read it all, but I'm with *this* guy!"

    Don't let me down.

    1. Re:Just a few more minutes... by Sparr0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, not 8 pages but...

      Has anyone verified that the IMEI is actually inserted into that field in the URL when the widget runs? The author says he tried to not send the IMEI, but maybe it just sends a placeholder value, or nothing at all, by default? I want to see traffic logs of the actual request including the IMEI before I get angry and [continue to] not buy an iPhone.

    2. Re:Just a few more minutes... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      daveschroeder is putting the finishing touches on his message. He'll post it shortly. : p

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Just a few more minutes... by ironwill96 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok here goes.

      This

      isn't

      really

      that

      big

      of

      a

      deal.

      I'm feeling better already, what about you?

      --
      "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." - Tennyson
    4. Re:Just a few more minutes... by jdc180 · · Score: 1

      And it shall be called roughlydrafted.

    5. Re:Just a few more minutes... by ThirdPrize · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is probably just to make sure that only iPhones use that service. Or registered iPhones at least.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    6. Re:Just a few more minutes... by mattgreen · · Score: 1

      Sort of a "user-agent" field, if you will?

      Ahem.

    7. Re:Just a few more minutes... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Here you go:

      I'm a strong advocate of privacy myself, but I don't see Apple's actions as being particularly unreasonable. You aren't being compelled to buy an iPhone, and it's up to each individual to decide how much they trust Apple with this. If you don't trust them, don't buy an iPhone. It's quite common for people to be asked to reveal personal information in a voluntary exchange (like when you apply for a job or a bank account) and there is always the possibility that this information could be misused or abused, or that the power you give another person to access such information could be misused or abused. But these types of transactions are always voluntary, and it's really a case of caveat emptor. If you don't trust the company, then don't give them your money and your privacy will remain intact.

      Having said that, people like the author of TFA are free to object to Apple's policy and to attempt to persuade them to change it. If it annoys enough iPhone customers, then it will go.

    8. Re:Just a few more minutes... by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I would guess user-agent is the same for all iPhones. The IMEI isn't. I then refer you back to my original post.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    9. Re:Just a few more minutes... by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, the idea of what is essentially a hardware device serial number being used to "track" anything at all, other than perhaps the fact the device is actually an iPhone, was to stupid for even me to grace with a response. ;-)

      This post sums it up quite nicely, though.

    10. Re:Just a few more minutes... by mattgreen · · Score: 4, Funny

      You, sir, win, by not only failing to bite at my semi-troll, but actually having a laugh yourself.

      Well-played.

    11. Re:Just a few more minutes... by nine-times · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm just waiting for someone to post the standard:

      Why is everyone going so easy on Apple for this? If Microsoft had done this, everyone would be screaming bloody murder! I mean, come on, it's been obvious for several years now that Apple is the source of all computing problems. They sell 1 button mice, for chrissakes. If they weren't evil, they'd just use Windows since it's the standard operating system!

    12. Re:Just a few more minutes... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I would guess user-agent is the same for all iPhones. The IMEI isn't. I then refer you back to my original post... ... which appears to claim that requiring a string on a URL is impossible to duplicate on non-iPhones, thus providing an excellent security measure.
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    13. Re:Just a few more minutes... by bolo1729 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Has anyone verified that the IMEI is actually inserted into that field in the URL when the widget runs?

      From the article: Any attempts to modify the URL to exclude the IMEI information will not allow you to retrieve any information in the "Stocks" and "Weather" apps.

      It seems that the author did...

    14. Re:Just a few more minutes... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 0

      The problem is the IMEI allows for SIM cloning, which is why you should *never* give it out.. it's unique to your SIM and used for billing etc.

      So iphone broadcasts it unencrypted via wi-fi.. and you're not bothered?

    15. Re:Just a few more minutes... by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      I am just saying that things like up to date stock info cost money and Apple is is giving it away as a free feature of the iPhone. Yes, you could quite easily take the URL used by YOUR iPhone and use it to get the data back in some other browser/app. Yes, you could pass the URL onto your friends and I bet that eventually Apple would eventually twig and ban it. A pirated IMEI would return the same as no IMEI. Nothing.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    16. Re:Just a few more minutes... by Valiss · · Score: 5, Funny

      I didn't read the whole thing, but I'm with that guy.

      --

      -Valiss
    17. Re:Just a few more minutes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem is the IMEI allows for SIM cloning, which is why you should *never* give it out.. it's unique to your SIM and used for billing etc.

      So iphone broadcasts it unencrypted via wi-fi.. and you're not bothered?
      The IMEI is unique to your phone, not your SIM, and isn't used for billing.
    18. Re:Just a few more minutes... by xENoLocO · · Score: 1

      Pff... I ain't readin all that.
      I do agree, though.

      --
      "The need to build the internet comes from something inside us, something programmed... something we can't resist."
    19. Re:Just a few more minutes... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Well, Apple does already know the IMEI numbers of all the phones that have been shipped to stores. And if they wanted to, they could make a pretty good estimate of which IMEI numbers have already gotten into consumer hands by looking at when those stores have re-ordered phones. And they presumably have access to information about which IMEI numbers have been activated with AT&T, though I'm not sure if they have that information in real time.

      So essentially all this does is confirm that yes, indeed, the IMEI number they figured was in use, is in fact in use. And if you want to be really paranoid, they can look at the IP address and figure out which carrier you are using if its not AT&T.

      What you think they are going to do with this information is a mystery to me. Sure, they could shut off access to these apps to non-whitelisted IMEIs, but the same people running unlocked/jailbroken/activated phones can trivially apply a patch that substitutes Apple's little XML web service URL with an alternative XML web service URL. This would be just about the simplest part of the iPhone hacking process.

      I'm more concerned about the fact that Apple has fixed the baseband bootloader bug in their newly shipping iPhones now that makes them, at least until a new exploit is found, non-unlockable. Apple's general "us-vs-them" attitude towards the people figuring out how to make their useless phones do all sorts of cool things has already resulted in a significant decrease in cool third party app development. Nobody wants to spend the time writing apps for a platform that may get totally locked down again at any moment, and where there will be an "official" SDK in 4 or 5 months. It's maddening.

      I can't wait for the GPhone platform to materialize. I will dump this piece of locked-down Apple junk faster than you can say "Android".

    20. Re:Just a few more minutes... by naetuir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Before I say this: I am an apple fanboi. I own an iPhone, iPod and my main computer is a MacBook Pro.

      That said..

      If M$ did this, there would be a shitstorm of the century.

      Apple isn't much (if any) better than M$. It's all in the perception of the people.

      I'll take the cute and cuddly overlords over the sharp and harsh ones anyday.

      --
      Use what works.
    21. Re:Just a few more minutes... by Twid · · Score: 1

      I'm off work this week, so I went ahead and did it.

      http://todd.dailey.info/archives/2007/11/19/the-iphone-imei-echo-chamber/

      In summary from that link:
      - The "imei" field being sent to Apple isn't your actual IMEI in plain text.
      - The weather and the stock widget both contain different values for the imei field, so there must be some sort of encoding or salt added to the actual IMEI value for each one.
      - At this point there's no empirical data that the imei field data being sent has anything to do with your actual IMEI, but it does appear to be some sort of identifier.
      - Also, I tried a reboot and the data in the imei field is persistent, it stays the same after a reboot.

      --
      - "When you want something with all your heart, the entire universe conspires to give it to you" -Paulo Coelho
    22. Re:Just a few more minutes... by Varun+Soundararajan · · Score: 1

      you cudn't have got more inaccurate than this, and yet you are informative, thanks to our generous Slashdot moderator overloads. -- (Score:-1, Rant).

    23. Re:Just a few more minutes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Pre-redundant

    24. Re:Just a few more minutes... by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      So iphone broadcasts it unencrypted via wi-fi.. and you're not bothered?
      No one said it was unencrypted, that's just your Anti-Apple zealotry leaking out.

      In fact, a previous poster looked at the data stream and it does appear that the IMEI number is hashed or salted or something.

      (Mmmmm.... salty hash browns.)
      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    25. Re:Just a few more minutes... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm waiting for an eight page anal-whatever about why making up stuff about "evil Apple" is a good thing.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    26. Re:Just a few more minutes... by atmurray · · Score: 1

      Yes but he is correct in stating that knowing someone else's IMEI is a bad thing (for them). You can re-birth phones marked as stolen by knowing someone's IMEI. It then results in havoc when two devices with the same IMEI connect to the same network.

    27. Re:Just a few more minutes... by risinganger · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for the GPhone platform to materialize. I will dump this piece of locked-down Apple junk faster than you can say "Android". Why exactly did you buy an iPhone?
    28. Re:Just a few more minutes... by spongebill · · Score: 0

      apple doesn't have the time or resources first off. secondly, they couldn't use that info in a court of law because backdoors in computer software for that purpose is unlawful. as far as ebay is concerned. that's not against the law either. if i were to sell you my old mac on ebay complete with Mac OS 10.4 Tiger that would be perfectly legal cause the license is now ours. What's illegal is if I sell the computer to you with Tiger and continue using that copy myself.

  3. Well... by abaddononion · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least it's Apple tracking you, not AT&T?

    Wait...

    1. Re:Well... by Typoboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right, AT&T has no possible way of tracking you, where you are, which cell tower you are talking to, etc.. oh wait </sarcasm>

  4. Tracking what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Exactly what are they tracking though? My location, my history, my music? What?!

    1. Re:Tracking what? by tgd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nothing, its a device serial number... not associated with your SIM and therefore not with your account. It proves its an iPhone to the webservice. Not much more.

      Bet I get modded down for saying it though :)

    2. Re:Tracking what? by slashflood · · Score: 1

      Nothing, its a device serial number... not associated with your SIM and therefore not with your account.
      But what about the credit card policy?
    3. Re:Tracking what? by kybred · · Score: 1
      Saying that they are 'tracking' you implies that they know where you are or how much you are using your phone. Certainly, AT&T (or whatever carrier you use) tracks you; they know what cell tower(s) you are near and they track your usage (re: the mega-page bills some iPhone users got initially).

      But sending the IMEI is not 'proof' of Apple tracking you or tracking your usage. OK, they know when you run the Stocks or Weather widget, but that's hardly 'usage'. And there is not evidence that they send any info about your location, either.

      Another poster mentioned that this is probably so the server can show you the stocks you've selected previously in the absence of cookies. That seems logical to me.

    4. Re:Tracking what? by dave420 · · Score: 2

      Well, they know who bought the handset, so they do know who owns the IMEI in question. And, unlike sim cards, you can't change your IMEI easily (or possibly at all - it's a crime to do so in some countries). So if they wanted to, they could trace pretty much everything you did. But then AT&T can do that (and much more), so people worrying about this when AT&T is poised to rape their data seems a bit silly :)

    5. Re:Tracking what? by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      Odd isn't it, how people oiver react to such trivial events.
      Mobile phones communicate with telco's. Satellite boxes communicate with satellite tv providers. PC's bought from pc manufacturers like Dell and HP routinely monitor the software that they installed on your machine and keep it updated.

      There will be many such connections, most innocent. People who install my software from download.com, if they don't deselect 'download source code' get that code downloaded from my own server, thus recording their download, and city of origin for me. Am I a bad person? Do I use this for marketing? Nope (well, it's open source and free, what marketing..), but it's handy to monitor how many people use my code, and where they are from.

    6. Re:Tracking what? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      And you don't think they register which phone was sold to which customer at the point of purchase?

    7. Re:Tracking what? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      You SHOULD be modded down, because you have very little ideal of what it is you're talking about:

      That whole registration passes your IMEI back to Apple and AT&T, so you can (amongst other things) have your handset disabled if stolen/lost.

      It proves its an iPhone to the webservice.

      Bzzt. Another wrong answer. IMEI is a unique mobile equipment identifier. Now, while these numbers are handed out in blocks to manufacturers, much like MAC addresses, the database is certainly not something easily (or perhaps even at all) accessible to the public. If you think Apple, or any other site is identifying your iPhone via IMEI, not UserAgent, you're utterly, laughably wrong.

      So you should get modded down, for sheer Apple-defending smug self righteousness.

    8. Re:Tracking what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think Apple, or any other site is identifying your iPhone via IMEI, not UserAgent, you're utterly, laughably wrong.

      They may or may not be using it to identify devices, but certainly *Apple* could determine if it's one of their own IMEI numbers.

    9. Re:Tracking what? by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      these numbers are handed out in blocks to manufacturers, much like MAC addresses

      and then you said

      If you think Apple, or any other site is identifying your iPhone via IMEI, not UserAgent, you're utterly, laughably wrong.

      I'm curious why exactly Apple would NOT know what IMEI numbers it has used on iPhones? They made the devices and were assigned the blocks of numbers as you stated above.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    10. Re:Tracking what? by kernelphr34k · · Score: 1

      Basically you're on the go with your cell and every time you make a call or use your cell on the network it's tracked via the IMEI# from the tower and logged into call logs on the providers network. This is how they track your phone, and which tower you're on and how you use your minutes. Not only is it handy for the provider to see exactly how many minutes you've used on there network, but they can also see from what state, and even down to what area of a city your calling from. Trianglulation your rough position is not all that hard. The IMEI# is a set of 15 numbers\... eh just read the wiki about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMEI

    11. Re:Tracking what? by tgd · · Score: 1

      They would know them... but facts don't make for interesting flames.

    12. Re:Tracking what? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Good point, I missed that error in logic. UA tracking still seems to me a better way to go than tracking an individual account holder.

    13. Re:Tracking what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Access to data feeds that someone has to pay for? That weather forecast isn't free nor is the stock market data, maybe the price Apple pays is based on the number of unique users/devices that accesses those feeds each day.

    14. Re:Tracking what? by DaggertipX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This just in - every time you make a call, AT&T knows what iPhone that call came from. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.

      Oh wait... that's normal. Tinfoil hats are jumping at peoples heads these days like headcrabs in Half Life.

    15. Re:Tracking what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      heise confirmed that they are not sending the IMEI!!!!!
      http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/99220

    16. Re:Tracking what? by actualpirate · · Score: 1

      It burns when I pee... Do I have headcrabs?

    17. Re:Tracking what? by waldo2020 · · Score: 1

      you're completely wrong fucker! many telcos bond the serial number to the SIM for registration and activation - you can bet Apple does it if only to connect that unit to your credit card and name for repair purposes. so WRONG!

    18. Re:Tracking what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That article is in German (so the text means next to nothing to me), but this screenshot from that article clearly shows that the IMEI number is sent as part of an http POST request: http://www.heise.de/bilder/99220/1/1

    19. Re:Tracking what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, don't you know perl? imei=%@ means they get all your IMEIs. (Isn't that a map of lists? Too many too count...)

    20. Re:Tracking what? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Informative

      heise confirmed that they are not sending the IMEI!!!!!
      http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/99220
      Errm, poor AC is still at 0 despite saying the truth. Mod up. Translated quote:

      The obvious suspicion that the IMEI of the phone is actually transmitted with each inquiry could not be confirmed by the tests heise Security did. Although a number actually was found in the HTTP requests to the Apple server they were not the IMEI of iPhones. Moreover, the weather applet sent a different "IMEI" in its query than the Exchange applet.
      IOW evil Apple sends an HTML request with the string "imei" in it, not the IMEI (of the phone). That's all the "proof" TFA needed - see sig for more info.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    21. Re:Tracking what? by Tim+Ward · · Score: 1

      Only if they bother to ask.

      To connect a call only the IMSI is needed.

      The network can ask the phone for the IMEI as well if it likes, and can use this for various purposes such as looking up the phone in a register of stolen phones and denying it service if found.

      But the network doesn't have to know the identity of the phone if it can't be bothered to ask (which costs airtime, of course on the signalling channels, and to what profitable purpose?), it only needs to know the identity of the SIM.

    22. Re:Tracking what? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Uhh yeah. "Phone number" doesn't mean much to you, does it? IMEI and other such acronymed nonsense be damned - everyone knows what a phone number is and what it's good for (and in the case of locked handsets, what handset it's attached to - not that it matters), and the phone number is attached to every single call.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    23. Re:Tracking what? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      It proves its an iPhone to the webservice. Kind of a useless security measure if that's what they're trying to do with it. It doesn't prove you're using an iPhone to access the service, or that you even own an iPhone. It only proves that you know an iPhone's serial number.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    24. Re:Tracking what? by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 1

      No, they don't.

      Locking a handset to an IMSI prefix range (MCC/MNC) is supported by most GSM MSes these days so that operators can sell subsidised 'locked' phones. This obviously has nothing to do with the IMEI, which is (as others have said) an informational element only, and is not used for anything other than EIR (equipment ID register) lookups (to prove you didn't flog the phone.)

      It's plausible that some carriers (although I honestly cannot see why) make a note of the IMEI when they sell you your phone, but even if the phone is locked, it's not guaranteed to still be you any time after you leave the shop (even locked phones can be used with other SIMs with the same MCC/MNC.

      In short, the ONLY use of an IMEI is to verify that a phone hasn't been stolen, and to restrict service/alert law enforcement if it has. It can be used as a serial number, but only in the same way that any other serial number can.

      You're a tool.

  5. iPod Touch by jolyonr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course, if I happened to be running the Stocks and Weather applications on my iPod Touch it wouldn't have an IMEI number to send, would it? Not that I am running those applications on my ipod, because that of course isn't allowed.

    Jolyon

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    1. Re:iPod Touch by rvw · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, if I happened to be running the Stocks and Weather applications on my iPod Touch it wouldn't have an IMEI number to send, would it? Not that I am running those applications on my ipod, because that of course isn't allowed. Well it could send the serial number instead of the IMEI.
    2. Re:iPod Touch by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know if it is an IMEI but when you sort things like stocks you want to watch or personalized weather as well as weather local to your direct vicinity, it has to send something to identify who your are and likely the your location. So I guess the question is, does this information need to identify the person, is there any way around that and does apple in fact store it? If so for how long and why?

      I'm not even sure this is a bad thing. It all depends on the stuff we don't know yet. To some, anything is a bad thing. But then again everyone is out to get them.

    3. Re:iPod Touch by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      The weather sites and Stock site preferences could easily be set in your phone's preferences, or your phone could request a "local weather" forecast by sending the local zipcode (perhaps gleaned from the Cell-towers). There is no reason why they would need to know "User XYZ is in denver, and wants to know what the weather looks like" or "User ABC is in Hawaii, and wants to know his current stocks".

    4. Re:iPod Touch by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Stocks and weather (Along with Maps) don't self-localise, you need to tell them what you want. In addition, it'd be far easier for the phone to send its base station number(s) as position info, since sending the IMEI involves the application server contacting the network provider to ask where the phone is, rather than just looking up the base station number in a local table.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    5. Re:iPod Touch by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      But you see, there is no reason not to know if the information is being deleted after it serves it's purpose.

      It isn't preferable to do things this way but it isn't automatically bad or evil. There is too much information that is just unknown to make any determination at this point.

  6. well by TheDrewbert · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome Steve Jobs as our new overlord.

    --
    http://www.CelloFourteGroupie.net
    1. Re:well by 15Bit · · Score: 1

      Well I, for another, do not.

    2. Re:well by Chyeld · · Score: 2, Funny

      I, for one, welcome Steve Jobs as our new overlord.

      New? When did he stop?

  7. Is this a problem? by DrXym · · Score: 1
    Most closed devices (e.g. consoles that have online stores), or phones, or pay-per-view boxes would be quite within their rights to send a device identifier with the request. In the case of a phone, that would be the IMEI.

    The moral here, is perhaps not to buy songs from Apple in the first place if it bothers you. Amazon.com sells music in MP3 format and you can use it any way and in any device you please.

    1. Re:Is this a problem? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      Or just don't by anything from Apple. Overpriced was always my opinion, and the whole TPM thing didn't seem to concern a lot of non-FSF people...but covert tracking? How many more things will Apple get away with before people stop acting like Apple is a perfect angel company?

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    2. Re:Is this a problem? by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      covert tracking? How many more things will Apple get away with before people stop acting like Apple is a perfect angel company?
      We still haven't seen any proof that anyone is being tracked, covertly or otherwise. You're being blinded by the glare from your tinfoil hat.
      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    3. Re:Is this a problem? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Didn't the TPMs get removed a while back? I was under the impression that they were only in the early boards.

  8. Why go through all that trouble? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    AT&T could send Apple whatever they wanted to know about usage and location.

    What else is there to know about your iPhone? Oh yeah, software version, but that's trivial to find out.

    Just when I'm looking to replace T-Mobile as my GSM provider, I'm pretty well stuck with the competition that is eager to drop their shorts and give whatever is asked for to whoever asks for it. Except me, of course.

    Well, time to go 'negotiate' with T-Mobile. Bleagh.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:Why go through all that trouble? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      How would AT&T tell Apple you were connected to the web using wifi?

      Using the information on requests apple can easily mine the number of people who go over AT&T EDGE and who use wifi.
      Also, if they do not ever want to block the URL from working with none iphone devices they can do it based on the IMEI and not on some if(!ipOwnedBy("AT&T")) code.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Why go through all that trouble? by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      I hear that the iPhone also takes secret photos of your ear when you are making phone calls and mails them back to Apple. Just so they can see what you are listening to.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    3. Re:Why go through all that trouble? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Ah, my mistake. Assuming Apple would necessarily ask for or receive info from only one source.

      Guess they would have to use the IMEI after all. No conspiracy required.

      I suppose most any device could do this, if it ran apps and bothered.

      You know, when you put it that way, it made AT&T look good. That's interesting.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    4. Re:Why go through all that trouble? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you but I tend to have the microphone pointing towards me when I'm making phone calls...

  9. That's not IMEI... by Rastignac · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's iMEI !
    Like all others Apple iThings.

    --
    -- Rastignac was here.
  10. apple the broker? by erikkemperman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I'm not an economist or stockbroker, it seems to me that if apple knows which shares iphoners are most interested in, at a given time, this is extremely valuable information, e.g. to spot trends. Can't be bothered to read the user-agreement (have no iphone) but curious to know whether it gives apple the right to sell this data on to large brokers or even act upon the intel themselves?

    --
    Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    1. Re:apple the broker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how would this data be better than the data everyone collects when people actually purchase and sell shares? Stock interest is reflected better in the price of futures, derivatives, and actual share price then it is a bunch of iphone users.

    2. Re:apple the broker? by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am pretty sure that would be illegal, and probably falls under laws that prohibit pump and dump stock scams....

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    3. Re:apple the broker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you think Google is making a good chunk of its money?

    4. Re:apple the broker? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Are you accusing Apple of colluding with others to topple the stock market?

    5. Re:apple the broker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because often people start gather information before making trades. After you see the pros buying or selling, it's too late.

    6. Re:apple the broker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt this would tell you much. Everyone I know using the stock application use it to watch stocks they've already purchased. I doubt they'll remove it from the app when they sell (at least right away) so even that won't tell you there's a giant sell-off on the way.

      People really playing the market don't use their iPhone to monitor it, they're in front of a computer all day watching it through their broker's site.

    7. Re:apple the broker? by instarx · · Score: 1

      While I'm not an economist or stockbroker, it seems to me that if apple knows which shares iphoners are most interested in, at a given time, this is extremely valuable information, e.g. to spot trends.

      While you have a good point - is Apple allowed to collect meta-data from user activity as well as phone ID data? (I suspect not) - your example is not so good.

      Investors can already use Level II quotes to tell what is being bought and sold by the second in any stock. Even as a private investor with a small portfolio I have the ability to watch the trades of any stock in real time. If I am watching Apple and you buy 50 shares I will see your transaction on my Level II screen as it trades. The only unique thing I can see about iPhone data would be to tell what iPhone users are buying and selling. That would be of little value because it would be such a small subset of the market, and there is no indication that iPhone-owning investors have any more insight than anyone else.

  11. more benign? by datapharmer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ever think maybe there was a more benign reason for this? Like to perhaps help in the retrieval of a stolen phone? Granted, it is probably not great for privacy, but if explicitly disclosed a savvy phone stealer could just disable or modify the apps. *This by no means excuses apple's privacy violations.

    --
    Get a web developer
    1. Re:more benign? by jdc180 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IIRC the carriers in the US could care less about retrieving a stolen phone. They could use GSM to lockout stolen phones, but don't. I'm sure apple doesn't either.

    2. Re:more benign? by cadeon · · Score: 1

      I tend to bet on ignorance over malice any day. I bet this is a way to verify that the request is actually coming from an iPhone, and the original dev team didn't even consider that it could be an invasion of privacy.

    3. Re:more benign? by jimicus · · Score: 2

      Maybe not in the US, but they certainly do in the UK. Stolen IMEIs are put on a blacklist and the blacklist is checked when the phone attempts to register with the network. The same blacklist is shared amongst all the network operators.

      There was talk about extending this blacklist to other countries, but I don't know how far it is down the line.

    4. Re:more benign? by theantipop · · Score: 1

      My sister recently had her phone stolen. She called Verizon and had the phone marked as stolen so when the thief went to reactivate it they simply confiscated the phone and notified her.

    5. Re:more benign? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      It's more than a blacklist.. it's a kill switch. If a phone receives a validated kill signal from the provider it bricks - if you're very lucky the phone will boot after that but for the most part unless you're into JTAG you have to throw the phone away.

      The providers worked out long ago that blacklists don't work - criminals don't care that it's illegal to change an IMEI.

      I can be a git if you find the phone after reporting it stolen - there's nothing anyone can do. It's 'un-stolen' but there's no signal or anything that can be sent to revive it.. you've gotta get a new phone.

    6. Re:more benign? by dwye · · Score: 1

      > They could use GSM to lockout stolen phones, but don't.

      Much more fun to track it, and find the telephonic equivalent of chop shops. Then, they can tell the phones to brick.

      It is better for the company to issue you a new phone, though (remember, if they catch the thief, it becomes evidence, and you don't get it back from the courts for months, during which time you might switch providers).

      They don't use the IMEI blacklists as much as they could because the EIR is an optional part of the GSM equipment base, which means that most providers (especially small ones) didn't buy one, and so don't update the lists, and so they aren't worth buying, and around it goes.

  12. Fast post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ zap

    This is the first post on this article coequal with Congress and monkey-spanking. ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ

  13. Tinfoil... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, should people start wrapping their iPhones in tinfoil?

  14. While you're waiting... by Huntr · · Score: 2, Informative

    You could just read all the comments about Blizzard's Warden program for WoW, as they will likely be strikingly similar.

  15. Maybe this discussion will be better than Diggs by tgd · · Score: 1

    I'd hope there are more people on here who know what an IMEI is, what its used for, when it is used on ANY GSM phone and how it relates to the IMSI...

    This is /., I expect the flamefest to be shorter...

  16. Is something similar being used on the iPod Touch? by 8127972 · · Score: 1

    After all, they do share the same code base. So it won't shock me if Apple is doing something similar there via the MAC address of the WiFi chipset.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  17. Get your facts straight... by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Funny

    "As I sit here applying a new layer of Reynolds tin foil to my international hat of conspiracy,"
    Reynolds doesn't make tin foil. They make aluminum foil! There is a big difference between Tin and Aluminum!

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Get your facts straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes. The main difference between them being that "aluminum" is actually "aluminium".

    2. Re:Get your facts straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a UK vs. US spelling issue. See wikipedia.

    3. Re:Get your facts straight... by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      So THAT is why I am dreaming about alien world domination!

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    4. Re:Get your facts straight... by colinbrash · · Score: 1

      [quote]Reynolds doesn't make tin foil. They make aluminum foil! There is a big difference between Tin and Aluminum![/quote]
      Yeah, and I'm sure the moon landing was faked, too.

      You conspiracy theorists sicken me.

    5. Re:Get your facts straight... by lubricated · · Score: 1

      that's true, but only on slashdot.co.uk

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    6. Re:Get your facts straight... by zygote · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly! A BIG difference.
      The aluminum ALLOWS the waves into your brain.
      That's why there is no TIN foil around any more.

      --
      the future is here, it is just not evenly distributed - w. gibson
    7. Re:Get your facts straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a big difference between Tin and Aluminum!

      Yeah, that's what they want you to think.

    8. Re:Get your facts straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a big difference between Tin and Aluminum! That's what they want you to think...
    9. Re:Get your facts straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but that's exactly what they want you to think!

    10. Re:Get your facts straight... by multiferroic · · Score: 1

      Yes, 37 protons and electrons.
      (and anything between 48 and 60 Neutrons (or more or less, but I'll leave the radioisotopes for today)

    11. Re:Get your facts straight... by hapihakr · · Score: 1

      So which works best to block alien transmissions... tin or aluminum?

  18. Argent's Variant to Hanlon's Razor, and solution by argent · · Score: 1

    This is more likely explained by a variant of Hanlon's Razor, to wit "never attribute to malice what could be explained by laziness".

    Since they know there's only one instance of the browser running on the phone, this is an easier way to maintain session information than using cookies. It's cheap, cheesy, and lazy.

    On to the solution: it shouldn't be hard to create a Mach/Cocoa overrider (using any of the various tricks to patch running apps, like APE does) to change the IMEI seen by widgets if you really want to hide which phone you are.

  19. Play It Off by pyr3 · · Score: 1

    Apple might be able to 'play off' the fact that they are gathering info on you through the Weather applet (though I find it unacceptable). But the Stocks applet? So now every request for stock information sent to Apple contains identifying information about myself? I

    'm sorry but which stocks I own/watch is my own business. Even when the PR machine spins up, "we're not doing anything with the information" is not good enough to me. Maybe that explanation would be good enough if it was just the Weather widget, because that info is somewhat irrelevant, but someone's financial information is different.

    1. Re:Play It Off by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Even if Apple weren't collecting this information, AT&T has access to it. And stock quotes are hardly "financial information" :)

    2. Re:Play It Off by pyr3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah, but which quotes I'm looking at is another can of worms. It implies that I either own stock in that company, or plan to. I realize that I could just be watching the stock "for fun," but aggregating this type of information to have the "big picture" is the problem.

    3. Re:Play It Off by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Well, I can think of a whole host of companies that have access to that information, which if denied access to it, would pretty much break the service. I guess you can't escape it :)

  20. Localized services by Fzz · · Score: 1
    Sure the conspiracy theorists will have a field day, but there is a basic conflict between providing localized services and privacy of location. I don't know what Apple really use this information for, but I'm sure that (like just about everyone else) Apple would like to provide locally-relevant information to you as you travel. Weather is an obvious one - the nicest simplest to use UI would obviously want to be able to tell you what the weather will be tomorrow wherever you happen to be today.

    Of course the phone company already knows where you are, and can provide this sort of service, but then you have to use the phone company's UI. Apple can provide you with a nice elegant unified user interface, and that's what most users want.

    Now, once they've got this information, they can misuse it for all sorts of purposes. It needs consumer pressure (or in Europe, there's data protection legislation) to keep such companies honest. But expecting them not to need to have this information is rather strange - they do have a need if they want to present the best localized UI possible.

    And no, I don't have an iPhone. I do have a Blackberry, and I know Research in Motion know where I am all the time, because most of my traffic traverses one of their proxies. Most other smart phones do something similar. Apple really doesn't seem half as bad in comparison.

    1. Re:Localized services by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1
      This is not really a question of what Apple does with the information, Apple is not out to harm its customers. It is more a question of what someone who is out to get you might be able to do with that sort of data. The FBI has been known to send agents to meetings of anti-war groups, who attempt to get group members to talk about actively fighting to government (e.g., with explosives); information about how members of such a group are using their cell phone could aide the FBI in this sort of activity. If you think that a company would put up a fight against a government request for such information...well, just a few days ago, Slashdot ran a story about Hushmail turning over decrypted copies of member email to the US government.

      OK, that is a bit tin-foil-ey. Less conspiracy theory oriented is the possibility of a person with a vendetta, who might be able to use that information to hunt you down. It isn't as contrived as you might think; there have been cases of people being actively stalked by ex-lovers or angry neighbors, and even of people being signed up for thousands of things they don't want by a person who is out to get them. Imagine what a stalker could do with information about what locality you are in, or what stocks you are tracking?

      There are plenty of legitimate reasons to be worried about this form of tracking. Privacy is more than a right, privacy is a freedom. Once we lose privacy, we start to lose our freedoms -- the freedom to protest the government, the freedom to speak our minds, the freedom to love who we chose, etc. It is unfortunate that the next generation has no respect for privacy, and no understanding of its importance; the "I have nothing to hide" attitude is like a mantra. When told that by using GPG for email and OTR with Pidgin for their IMs they can keep their conversations private, they just shrug, because the effort of configuring a plugin that protects their privacy is too much effort for something that is not important enough. If the government mandated that RSA private keys must be surrendered to the Police upon request, they wouldn't even blink an eye, not for lack of understanding, but for simple apathy about who reads their email or IMs. A lot has been written about this new phenomenon, and the best summary I've seen is this: The next generation expects someone to be watching them at all times.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
  21. the wrong way by BBird · · Score: 1

    they are definetly going the wrong way here
    (as they did so many times), and will pay
    a dear price.

  22. Tracking? by nickovs · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's a substantial difference between receiving information and tracking people. Do the land-line phone companies "track" the calls you make? Sure, they use it to send you a bill, but most people don't seem to think it's a privacy violation. The author does not, as he claims, have "proof" that Apple track iPhone users, simply that they have the wherewithal to collate information about the services used by people if they could be bothered.

    The IMEI number is there to facilitate identifying mobile devices to the Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN) for the purpose of charging for services. Your IMEI goes out every time you connect to the EDGE network or any GPRS service anywhere in the world, and is (and always has been) logged by the phone company, irrespective of what brand of phone you have. It's always been possible for the phone company, or anyone with the right data sharing relationship with the phone company (e.g. Apple), or the police with a court order, or the CIA/FBI/KBG/MI6, to link this to the IP address assigned to the mobile device, and from there to server logs. People who worry about this shouldn't just be wearing tin-foil hats, they should be putting tin foil around their phones too.

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
    1. Re:Tracking? by kybred · · Score: 5, Informative

      The IMEI number is there to facilitate identifying mobile devices to the Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN) for the purpose of charging for services.

      No, that would be the IMSI. The IMEI just identifies what equipment you are using.

    2. Re:Tracking? by CapitanMutanda · · Score: 1

      IMEI is not set to the core network, what you are thinking is the IMSI. The IMEI is used to track stolen devices, feature is optional and the operator need to have an EIR (db of stolen devices). Maybe IMEA + some other info helps track exactly hacked phones and in some way act on them (bricking??)

      Nonetheless, this certainly enables tracking quite reliably user activities.

      Would add a good reason not to buy the device.

    3. Re:Tracking? by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      Problem here is that Apple doesn't need or deserve that info. It'd be like finding out that Motorola phones were, well, 'phoning' home to Motorola headquarters and not the service provider you have a service agreement with.

    4. Re:Tracking? by DrMorris · · Score: 1
      Isn't that exactly what the original poster said?

      He said: "The IMEI number is there to facilitate identifying mobile devices ..."
      You said: "The IMEI just identifies what equipment you are using."

    5. Re:Tracking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IMEI just identifies what equipment you are using.
      I'm sure you probably know this but your phrased it poorly so I'll expand on it for those who dont. the IMEI number identifies your personal handset. it it unique on every single GSM device. every iPhone has a unique IMEI (which is the part i though you left ambiguous, and that it might be interpreted that it identified the type of equipment)
    6. Re:Tracking? by kybred · · Score: 1

      Isn't that exactly what the original poster said? No.

      He said:

      for the purpose of charging for services.

      That's not what the IMEI is used for. The IMSI is tied to your account. You can put your SIM card in another GSM phone and it should work (assuming the other phone is not SIM locked).

    7. Re:Tracking? by DrMorris · · Score: 1

      Damn, I need to get more sleep! You are of course 100% correct, I guess I stopped reading the sentence yesterday when I reached the word 'devices'... :-)

  23. I want rid of Stocks and YouTube! by PhillC · · Score: 1

    I just wrote some first impressions regarding my new iPhone. The inability to remove both the YouTube and Stocks icons is my biggest annoyance so far. Now I have even more reason to be rid of Stocks! Guess I'm going to have to void my warranty after all....

    --
    Brought to you by the author of such childrens' classics as "Some Kittens can Fly!" and "All Dogs go to Hell."
  24. simple solution by eck011219 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just use your phone in a Faraday cage, and they can't track you at all.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:simple solution by WCTRFF · · Score: 1




      --
      Posted from my iPhone from within a Faraday Cage
      Sweet sweet Faraday cage. Is there nothing you can't do?

  25. Just change it... by javab0y · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Apple IMEI is TEA encrytped according to the phone's hardware ID and NOR ID. Both of these numbers can be found with a few tools found at iphone-elite.org. The IMEI lives at 0xA003FAB00 address. All you need to do is write out your seczone (0xA003FA000), TEA encrypt a nice Motorola RAZR IMEI number at offset 0xB00, and write it back to your NOR...and voila...your iPhone now looks like a Motorola RAZR.

    1. Re:Just change it... by dave420 · · Score: 4, Informative

      ... and go to jail! It's illegal to change your IMEI in the UK, fyi, so this isn't the best advice for anyone in the UK.

    2. Re:Just change it... by kybred · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All you need to do is write out your seczone (0xA003FA000), TEA encrypt a nice Motorola RAZR IMEI number at offset 0xB00, and write it back to your NOR...and voila...your iPhone now looks like a Motorola RAZR.

      Would you try that and let us know if your visual voicemail and widgets still work? Thanks!

      (That seems like a really bad idea. Maybe substitute a fake iPhone IMEI, but not a RAZR one).

    3. Re:Just change it... by javab0y · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep...they work peachy. The service is off your SIM, not the IMEI. As for illegality...yep...I live in the USA...so no laws preventing it here. Yes...those who do this should probably examine their own countries' laws.

    4. Re:Just change it... by kybred · · Score: 1

      As for illegality...yep...I live in the USA...so no laws preventing it here.

      Hmm. Maybe no laws, per se, but the carrier would be within their authority to ban your phone if they find out the IMEI has been changed. The IMEISV has the software version embedded in it; the carriers require that the software be type approved.

      Whether or not they would is another question.

  26. Nowadays any prospect info is good info by Serpentegena · · Score: 1

    Sad story - for 3 non-consecutive years, I volunteered in a fund-raiser for the symphony orchestra here in my home town(I was in music school at the time). They had my name, email addy and phone number.
    Last month, I received a call from their sales department where a very polite man tried to sell me subscriptions to the next season.
    I got rightfully insulted, because the least they could call me with is a job...Then, having worked as desk monkey for an IT sales organization, I chalked it up to overzealous merchants and moved on, albeit rather dissapointed in the cultural stature of said symphony orchestra.
    Moral of the story: when a company is out to make money(and they often are), any prospecting info is good info.

    --
    Microsoft put the "sucks" in "success".
  27. In Soviet Russia, Weather Widgets Track You! by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    They are tracking how many times you check the weather. It's probably to gather data to test the viability of using iPhone to proactively provide mental health services. People who suddenly begin displaying obsessive compulsive tendencies by checking the weather over and over will be offered the new service.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia, Weather Widgets Track You! by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      People who suddenly begin displaying obsessive compulsive tendencies by checking the weather over and over will be offered the new service.
      I'm expecting a visit from the men in white coats any minute, then.
      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
  28. do you think just maybe it's not all bad news by Locutus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe they just mesh the IMEI number with location data provided by the GPS and/or AT&T to give you weather information based on where you are located at the time. Ever seen the ad where Google is used to find local eating joints? Don't know about you but I did not see any kind of location information getting entered and so some kind of location info is getting used.

    And you know that every ISP keeps records on what phones ping what cell towers and your ISP( AT&T ) already is known to have been very willing to hand out cell records.

    So get a pre-paid phone at Walmart if you want to limit your track-ability. After all, getting a "smart" phone from Apple with all the locked down and tied to Apple features isn't a clue that they just might track things? I hope you don't touch anything running Microsoft code.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    1. Re:do you think just maybe it's not all bad news by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Yes this is the kind of thing that is done all the time, this is why I get adverts targeted at me for where my ISP is (I am over 100 miles from the registered address of my ISP)

      Your mobiles position is tracked all the time, it would not work if it wasn't! A surprising large number of people already have or can get access to this information already and if used properly can be used to track you (or at least your mobile) very closely (by triangulation).

      But note this only tracks your mobile, not you... If your car is stolen, with your mobile, and credit cards in it, then I'd be surprised if the Police tried to prove you were speeding, buying goods, and using premium rate lines, all hundreds of miles apart all at the same time...

      If you don't want to be tracked don't own a mobile .... (or turn it off)

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    2. Re:do you think just maybe it's not all bad news by tokul · · Score: 1

      Maybe they just mesh the IMEI number with location data provided by the GPS and/or AT&T to give you weather information based on where you are located at the time.
      Where is your tinfoil hat? Third party gets information about where you are with precision of 15 meters in order to provide weather reports. Is it really needed? Do they have weather reports with less than 1 km precision?
    3. Re:do you think just maybe it's not all bad news by Scamwise · · Score: 1

      When you get hit by the tornado and I'm standing 15 meters away untouched looking for a seafood restaurant on my iPhone we will see who's laughing.

      --
      Sam "to lazy to register" Look
    4. Re:do you think just maybe it's not all bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What GPS data would that be? Definitely not from the GPS built into the iPhone! :P

      Ducks

    5. Re:do you think just maybe it's not all bad news by Locutus · · Score: 1

      there is no GPS currently built into the iPhone but the AT&T mobile transceivers do have them. And that data could be used with other information to triangulate a better resolution.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  29. just great....not! by PhiberOptix · · Score: 1

    the iphone *needs* to access the site http://iphone-wu.apple.com/ with your imei in order to update the weather.app. After i blocked the url in my proxy server, the weather app would no longer update.
    What is weird is that it either is sending a wrong imei number, or it is a hashed value...

  30. Reynolds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm sorry, but Reynolds tin foil isn't really an option anymore, because they use aluminum alloy (look at the bottom of the FAQ). It isn't even pure aluminum anymore! It's getting harder and harder to find a genuine tin foil manufacturer. It's a conspiracy, I tell you!

  31. Re:Is something similar being used on the iPod Tou by cadeon · · Score: 1

    This is likely the differentiator between an iPhone and iPod Touch. If there's no IMEI, then it's not an iPhone, and the app doesn't work.

  32. Instead of over reacting.... by Enzo1977 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone thought that maybe the applications like weather and stocks are transmitting the IMEI number to Apple so that they are only providing service for their widgets on their own product?

    What if I took a Nokia Symbian phone and hacked together a widget that queried Apple for an update on stocks and weather? I would think Apple would be mildly upset that I were exploiting their service. The sensible action would be to have the server query the IMEI number and verify it is transmitting data to a allowed recipient.

    But that's just me using common sense and my extreemly rudimentary knowledge of technology. Sorry I forgot this is SlashDot. I now patiently await the attacks on my grammar, spelling, poor knowledge of mobile phone platforms and even worse knowledge of how the internets works. Because it's really just all a series of tubes. Wireless tubes without locks or valves.

    --
    I hate all sigs, even this one.
    1. Re:Instead of over reacting.... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      What would be the point? You can get weather and stocks from lots of places.

      As others have pointed out this works on the ipod touch too so it doesn't *need* to send the IMEI at all.

  33. let's break it! by cuss · · Score: 1

    what if someone runs a script which infinetly connect to this URL:

    http://iphone-wu.apple.com/dgw?imei=2335&apptype=finance

    maybe changing imei data.

    Will their data be still interesting?

  34. Re:Is something similar being used on the iPod Tou by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    The app *does* work on the touch though, so that argument doesn't work.

  35. Not at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "but aggregating this type of information to have the "big picture" is the problem."

    I'd say the problem is your ignorance combined with your rampant paranoia.

    1. Re:Not at all by pyr3 · · Score: 1

      I'm not paranoid that Apple in particular will do something with it. I just don't like it when companies are trying to pump some sort of information out of you. There may be a rational explanation for this, but I can't see how it 'makes sense' for them to attach identifying information to Weather and Stock info requests...

    2. Re:Not at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but I can't see how it 'makes sense' for them to attach identifying information to Weather and Stock info requests..."

      And that's the "ignorance" I was talking about.

    3. Re:Not at all by pyr3 · · Score: 1

      Then please enlighten me. I realize that the requests will have IP addresses attached to them, but that doesn't link it directly to *me* unless they go through the mobile carrier that I'm using. There are barriers to the information that are placed in front of them. If a personal identifier is sent with each request... there are no barriers. They already have the info.

  36. Things that make me go hmmmm..... by Slash.Poop · · Score: 1

    I just find it interesting that if you were to replace the words Apple and iPhone with....oh I don't know maybe say Microsoft and Vista you would have completely different messages. Even if it was complete legitimate that it be sending information, like updating a weather app. You would still have 9000 people screaming bloody murder with 2 little word changes. However it involves Apple so what you have is slightly over 100 comments with some iPeople looking for anything they can to defend it. Just interesting to me.

    1. Re:Things that make me go hmmmm..... by jkoke · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that you seem to be able to predict exactly what would happen in a hypothetical situation without offering any evidence as to why this might be so. I mean, I don't begrudge you your gut feelings, but they surely can't form the basis of an argument, can they? Can you point to an instance in which Microsoft collected personally identifiable information from a portable electronics device and 9,000 people screamed bloody murder? Or was that hyperbole, designed to prop up your non-existent point?

    2. Re:Things that make me go hmmmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahah that's exactly what I was thinking... the moment I saw "oh wait, but it's ok because..."

      But of course it's ok because Apple is a kind, benevolent company only doing things for the benefit of mankind unlike the evil empire of Microsoft who is out to eat your children.

    3. Re:Things that make me go hmmmm..... by Slash.Poop · · Score: 1

      What argument? I was not commenting on the collection of the information or on either company. It was simple observation about the SlashDot message board and its tendencies. You know that if this story had to do with Microsoft doing this same thing people would be screaming as they always do. That is not a hypothesis that requires testing. I have been reading this website for long enough to know that as fact. However you are right. It was a hyperbole simple because I have never seen any article with 9000 responses. Have a good Turkey Day :-)

  37. Network Authentication? by gsa700 · · Score: 1

    Like a few people have already stated, this is probably being used to make sure that no evil unlocked iPhones are using their services.

    Also, it could be like MAC authentication because essentially an iPhone is just a client on their WAN.

    Finally could this be a means of redirecting the apps to a new provider should Yahoo piss them off?

    --
    "You do not support the root but the root supports you." - Romans 11:18
    1. Re:Network Authentication? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is probably being used to make sure that no evil unlocked iPhones are using their services.
      So using a device that you purchase in the way you want it to work is evil? Competition in the marketplace is evil?
  38. Even worse by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    Even worse: I went to a Web site and it warned me that my iPhone was broadcasting its IP address to EVERYONE!

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  39. mod parent up by oPless · · Score: 1

    It's the truth. change IMEI => goto jail, do not pass go, do not collect £200

  40. Here is a way to disable this tracking... by JackMeyhoff · · Score: 1

    STOP GIVING THEM YOUR MONEY.... is it THAT difficult? Really, have people lost their brains and common sense while I was away?

    --
    http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
  41. Off the wire? by awehttam · · Score: 1

    Has anyone actually captured this off the wire? IEMI is self-descriptive, but it'd be interesting to see if it's the full IEMI or something else completely.

  42. And the URL is? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    So we all can do a little hack to drench the URL in falsified information making the data completely invalidated.

    If you can't get them by doing A you can do it by doing B instead.

    </evil>

    Of course all mobile devices are identifiable, the IMEI is part of the GSM standard and identifies the handset, just dial *#06# on your phone. The IMSI is the ID stored on the SIM card.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  43. But Hanlon's Razor is vulnerable to Hanlon's Bane by TechnicolourSquirrel · · Score: 1

    "Never admit to malice that could easily be excused as indifference."

  44. Apple the next big Microsoft by HartDev · · Score: 1

    For the longest time I have been pushing open source, it works, its free and if there is a problem you can pop the hood and replace parts. It is very apparent that Apple will be the next Microsoft, and their monopoly (if they got one) would be worse then MS's because they control the hardware and software. But, for the time being, I am loving my iPhone that has T-Mobile for its service, and until I have problems, I'm interested in taking down monopolies but Apple isn't there yet.

    --
    To see a few of my Android apps goto: www.hartwired.com
  45. Phone home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the commentators here seem to be missing the point, rather eagerly so. Nothing to bother here, move on please will not do. However the key word here is surreptitiously. How many Iphone users knew about this before this story broke? So what else is your Iphone sending that you don't know about. In the long term it pays to care about these things.

  46. What about incomming calls? by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

    The phone company pretty much has to track your phone 24x7. How else do they know how to route incoming phone calls. They have to know which cell tower you are nearest and they have to keep the information in a central place so they can quickly look it up when you get a call.

    I know they keep this information too. I lost my cell phone once and called Verison to ask them the last few locations they had. They were able to answer to within a few miles. Enough that I could figure out which place a left my phone.

    If you do not want to be tracked then do not cary a radio transmitter around with you all day.

  47. Marketing... by Count+Sessine · · Score: 1

    They're tracking hacked iPhones to figure out where to roll out the iPhone next. That is, if a ton of them are being used in Lithuania, expect the iPhone to be rolled out in Lithuania next.

  48. Tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they have to track it. How else will they know when its in an advantageous position to carry outs its mission ?

  49. MY LITTLE i by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 1

    I spy, with my little eye, lots of things that start with an i

  50. This is not the IMEI by iPhoneMoblog · · Score: 1

    Under docpool.org/iphone you can see, that the numbers on stocks and weather are different.

  51. The IMEI is *not* transmitted by juct · · Score: 1

    heise Security did some research on this issue and actually captured the packets with the requests for stock prices. And while they did contain a number, it was certainly not the IMEI of the iphone. For what it is worth: the weather application even transmitted a different imei parameter. see: Controversial checks of stock prices with iPhone bye, ju

  52. Shorter list by aztektum · · Score: 1

    Of companies that AREN'T tracking you.

    Have a credit card? Use a bank/credit union? Have utility bills? Ever buy anything without using cash? Wait wait, have a social security number (yes only applies to US citizens.) Ever fly on a commercial airline? Ever sign up for a "discount card" at a retail store? Ever leave the country? Let's not forget there is now even the possibility any international calls are being snooped on. AT&T is sending all your Internets to San Francisco!

    And yet THIS is the one people choose to pay attention to.

    Hm.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  53. Amazing how many people will defend Apple. by Britz · · Score: 1

    Now that's brand marketing for you, Bill! (sucker!)

    Anyways, gimme the URL, I'd like to send them some stuff. (hehehe)

  54. In Google maps the search area by AlgoRhythm · · Score: 1

    is determined by the portion of the map within active view. If you are looking at China and search for a restaurant, it isn't going to be anywhere near you (unless you are actually in China, of course).

  55. Openness is great ... by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    So, what's the last word on OpenMoko development?

  56. cell operators CAN pass your details on by speculatrix · · Score: 1

    there's a system whereby the cellular/mobile operator can pass some part of your identity on; in the UK it's called whitelisting - they simply put a URL into their whitelist of websites which are allowed to receive additional headers allowing them to uniquely identify the cellphone/mobile phone (GSM in UK/Europe). GPRS data is a finicky beast, given that the mobile phone lives behind multiple levels of nat, special gateways to fragment IP to go over the GSM air protocol etc, so it's very hard for a website to be able to give a persistent session to a mobile phone - especially as some (historically) have poor cookie handling. Used sensibly, it's a reasonable thing to do. Oh, and it was admitted on a mailing list by an employee of O2, the UK operator who won the contract from Apple to gouge their customers for lots of money, that they record and track the handset data to make sure that people don't take their iPhone "unlimited data" sim and put it into a different phone for use with their computer!

  57. Knowing Apple... by dubbleenerd · · Score: 1

    ... its probably iMEI (and stands for Message Exchange Interface) or, Multiple Extension Internetworking...

  58. Why this matters by 0ptix · · Score: 1

    AT&T has this data already. But apple doesn't have to. Apple getting this data would be like Nokia or Ericsson rather the t-mobile keeping track of when, how, or where ur phone is being used.

    This also refutes some claims made in previous posts that this is a non-issue since our phone providers keep track of this stuff anyway. The analogy that land line companies having this data is a bad one. Apple is to your land line phone MAKER not PROVIDER.

    So yes, assuming that the IMEI really IS sent to Apple (which wasn't exactly verified by the TFA's author) this can be considered a privacy issue beyond the usual. (Releasing ANY data is a privacy issue to whomever. Just sometimes they are unavoidable or useful enough to out weigh the potential problems. Not this case though.)

    Personally I don't see it as being as trivial as some posters have made it out to be either. Even assuming the IMEI is encrypted when sent out (with reasonable authentication and privacy unlike say GSM or WEP) it is always a bad idea to be releasing such critical information to a third party. In particular a third party which happens to be a large coorporation which is (understandably) motivated by profit and self interest.

    What can be tracked with your IMEI? Your IMEI is a unique identifier for your phone. Thus if it can be correlated with location, time or any other data this is essentially YOUR private information. I think no one needs a picture drawn for them of what's wrong with Apple correlating IMEI with sock data queries or (to a lesser degree) weather queries. But even just allowing Apple to correlate with time (i.e. when your phone was on and when not) is already more then Apple should know. The point is the moment we're talking about _unique_ numbers being reported somewhere bell's should be ringing.

    Since announcing your IMEI to Apple is not vital to intended functionality of the iPhone I think the "feature" was a... mistake, and should be disabled (by Apple in an ideal world).

  59. Conspiracy hats off... by shmlco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And according to a German security site, the ID is the same for every phone that was tested. Conspiracy hats off. Case closed.

    Maybe now we can discuss if the Kindle knows which pages you're lingering over and transmits suspicous activity to the NSA...

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  60. Gmail asks for unique identifier by mattr · · Score: 1

    Don't know about Gmail, but a small number of sites ask for the device unique id when I connect from my Japanese docomo phone. Gmail asks when I connect via ssl. I can choose to refuse.

  61. Apparently the "paranoia" tag is correct by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

    It seems the answer to the headline is "no."

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  62. UPDATE by BMIComp · · Score: 1

    As the article has been updated... they have redacted the part about it being the IEMI number.

  63. Rubbish by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    The iPhones are pretty integrated into certain carriers. Those carriers can map an IMEI number in use to a location, to a phone number or to the subscriber information. I can quite easily see Apple/O2/AT&T offering a pseudo-GPS system based upon cell tower you're in range of, or offering a "where are my buddies?" service that did similar, for example.

  64. Statistics published as a result of tracking by rajats · · Score: 1

    There have been statistics published all across the news and magazines, for example
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,304456,00.html
    If apple/at&t wasn't tracking the iPhones through their IMEIs how could they have published these numbers?

  65. How does this differ to a static IP? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Some websites track IP addresses so they check for abuse. How is this different? an IMEI is much more secure.