Slashdot Mirror


Does Constant Access Shatter the Home/Work Boundary?

StonyandCher has passed us a link to PCWorld.au, once again raising the tough topic of work/life separation. A department of the Australian government went ahead with a purchase of dozens of Blackberry communication devices, but is now delaying their deployment. The reason: "Staff expressed fears about BlackBerries contributing to a longer working day and felt it was going a step too far because mobile phones are adequate for out-of-office contact. Not everyone agreed, however, with some senior executives claiming a BlackBerry can contribute to work/life balance by facilitating telecommuting and more flexible schedules. " For the time being this issue is on hold for those staffers, but how does this issue fall for you? Is constant accessibility freeing or just another chain around your neck?

321 comments

  1. this is incumbent upon the employee by yagu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know employers can apply pressure, but employees should try to establish early and firmly what extended accessibility means. Pagers have been around for millenia, Blackberrys simply give better message.

    Arrange and agree to a schedule for which you consider yourself "on call", publish those times, and make it clear you aren't "on call" when you aren't.

    Personally, I see the encroachment more often by those who have some tension with their personal life whereby this constant connectivity to their job elevates somehow their status, and provides instant and real-time reason/excuse to be unavailable in their personal lives. In other words, lots of those who "get connected" like this do so willingly, and with a certain sense of self-importance.

    My other observation has been that those who are not to be bothered by work when they're not expected to be available off-hours simply don't carry their Blackberry, or turn it off.

    I know there's always the exception, but I think most employer-employee relationships can and do strike equilibrium with minimal fuss. If your employer is that horrid in their insistence and demands, find another employer. I did.

    1. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by phillips321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It wont be long before people find the solution to this problem...
      http://forumpix.co.uk/i.php?I=1197646911

    2. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the solution to your solution
      http://forumpix.co.uk/i.php?I=1197647125

    3. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by MBCook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. It's the employee's fault. They're willing to put up with it. There was a time before cell phones when the same kind of thing was true. If you were a town doctor in the 1800s, you think you got to say "I'm only open 8-5, M-F"? People got sick when they got sick. Accountants didn't have to take their work home, but it was known that as a doctor you were on call all the time.

      If you don't like it, push back, let your work know that when you aren't on call, you're not on call. This is just a boundaries issue. People don't want to set them (afraid of repercussions, don't know they have the option, like the "piece of mind" they get from being able to watch what's going on at work, whatever)... so they put up with this.

      Blackberries are just a symptom/enabler. They make this problem easier to occur than during the '60s (when bringing your work home or to vacation meant hauling a bunch of papers and books and such).

      People just need to learn to adapt to this change and handle it. Just like people are being forced to invent manners and limits for other things that weren't considered before (like cell phones). That's our transition that we're going through now.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by somersault · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For some reason I got incredibly excited about the idea of being able to access company email remotely, mostly just because of the geek factor. I've had to setup a few blackberrys for some of my users and I hated them, but I like how Windows Mobile Direct PUSH synchronises directly with our Exchange server without any modifications (obviously because they're both microsoft products, but exchange is one of the few Microsoft products that is worth the money..). Anyway, after being excited about it for a couple of weeks, I quickly got fed up of the way that I ended up doing extra work in the evenings by replying to emails on my phone, and stopped. The facility is still there for emergencies though..

      Sadly my IT assistant keeps his phone on all the time, and in fact was emailing/MSNing me about work matters this week even though he's on holiday. He's going to charge for overtime, but still, I find the very idea of doing work on holiday sickening, even if you're an MD or something (where it's more likely that you really do need to be connected). My uncle once spent what seemed like half of our family holiday in France on his mobile.. yuck.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by trbofly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now, I imagine I make a little more than the likely (14$ per hour) average /. reader, however I have been on-call my entire career.

      Since 19 I have carried a pager, cell phone, laptop, or some combination of the three with me where ever I go. Its in my car at all times or within 5 mins of where I am. (Except my private motorcycle times when the weather is warm)

      My wife knew what she was getting into when she married me, so it hasnt been an issue of contention there. Aside from 1 CEO who abused my availability (SWH I am talking to you. Jerk), I have been able to balance the two.

      What I am getting at is that I go into each negotiation knowing I will be on-call. I dont take a position unless I am making what I should, includding my afterhours time. I have been lucky enough that the coroporations want me badly and to date havent had an issue.

      I sort of agree with the parent that on-call made me feel important in the beginning. I was young. I am well past that and see it as just another day in the office.

      T

    6. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by SetupWeasel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you don't like it, push back, let your work know that when you aren't on call, you're not on call. This is just a boundaries issue.

      No, no. This is an employment issue. You could lose your job for "pushing back." Some people don't have that option.

    7. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Arda+Valinor · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more.

      --
      The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. - Albert Einstein
    8. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by eln · · Score: 1

      [quote]Now, I imagine I make a little more than the likely (14$ per hour) average /. reader, however I have been on-call my entire career.[/quote]

      I think (or hope) you're vastly underestimating the average /. reader's salary there, but who knows. At any rate, that level of pay is way too low to be on call 24x7 in my opinion, unless you live in a third world country or get massive bonuses for pager pay.

      Anyway, when I worked at small mom and pop ISPs where I was the only sysadmin (or one of two or three), I was on call constantly, and I dealt with it. However, if your company has the staff to at least rotate on call, they should do it. Being on call constantly will burn people out very quickly. Even if you don't get called, the limits that on-call can put on your leisure time (no trips outside of cell range, must be within a short distance of Internet access) can be quite stressful over time. Sure, if your life is your work it's probably not so bad, but what kind of life is that?

      Where I work now, the junior and intermediate admins are hourly employees, and the senior level guys are on salary. If you're hourly, and you work in the offhours, you get 1.5x overtime. If you're salaried, you get comp time. On call is rotated between members of a team, and most people will be on call around once every 4 to 8 weeks depending on the size of the team. Since we have people in the command center on staff 24x7, we only get called for escalations, and we get paid $125 per weekend day ($50 per weekday day) that we're on call, whether we get called or not.

      As I get older, I am constantly amazed at what people are willing to put up with from their employers. I see employment as a simple business deal: you are exchanging your services for compensation. Like any business deal, if both sides are not getting what they need from it, they should seek to either renegotiate or terminate the relationship. If your employer is abusing your good work ethic by calling you all the time for non-emergency things (meaning the building is not actually on fire), especially if they aren't paying you anything extra for it, then you either need to have a talk with your employer or go find another one.

    9. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by MBCook · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you don't want to be on call, don't take a job that expects you to be on call. If the job you took didn't including being on call and they want you to be, tell them no... that wasn't in the job description. You could negotiate for something ("You want me to start being on call, that's an expansion in my responsibilities, will my compensation go up as well?"). If you took a job where you were on call and don't like it too bad. That's the job you took and you signed up for it.

      If everyone who had this problem actually stood up, they wouldn't fire people because there wouldn't be enough people left. You're not helpless.

      Also, remember that some of these people don't have that responsibility. They just check their blackberry out of habit. They don't need to. It's all their choice. They aren't being forced into it, they are choosing it then complaining about it.

      Work doesn't have to be fun. It's a means to an end: being able to take care of and feed yourself and your family. It's not your personal satisfaction center. That's nice if it is, but people used to understand that. A lot of this just sounds like whining to me.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    10. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by fatlaces · · Score: 1

      Right on. Don't put up with too crap. Especially if you are younger, they'll bully you into bending over for them. Also live your real life without Office on your computer.

      I decided on no Microshaft software on my Leopard PowerBook except for a codec or 2. No Office, No Open Office even, no remote desktop, VNC, or other workarounds.

      The platform of choice isn't important as not even trying to be connected to work. Your stress levels will thank you.

    11. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Regional Manager in Colorado, there is no local office here so I do all of my work Remotely. I've got a cell phone and I am on call 24/7 to deal with issues that come up.

      When I first started the position, it was difficult to separate work from home since my home was where I worked. I eventually got tired of answering emails all day long from when I got up to when I went to sleep. I have to answer the phone whenever it rings and I just didn't want to do that with emails.

      So, I set up my own workday for emails. Once I get to 5:00, I don't respond to emails until the next day. Like a lot of other geeks who spend all day on the computer, I do frequently use my computer to unwind at the end of the day by doing non-work stuff. If I get an email, I can read it, but - unless it's a drastic emergency - all I do is read it. (If it is a drastic emergency, I'm usually about 10 seconds away from getting a call about it anyway)

      It's worked great for me, and I highly suggest it. If you can't get yourself away from answering the phone, at least take emails out of the equation and check them then next day. Because really, if something ACTUALLY can't wait until morning, someone's going to get ahold of you in an other way than email.

      Your email won't be going anywhere, it'll be waiting for you when you're ready for it! :)

    12. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by SetupWeasel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If everyone who had this problem actually stood up, they wouldn't fire people because there wouldn't be enough people left. You're not helpless.

      Yes, but if you are the only one...

      Also, remember that some of these people don't have that responsibility. They just check their blackberry out of habit. They don't need to. It's all their choice. They aren't being forced into it, they are choosing it then complaining about it.

      I am a tutor. I have taken shit from my boss, because she couldn't reach me Wednesday night to change my schedule for Thursday. Changing my hours at will was not in the job description, and I don't even make enough at the job to sustain me. I look for more or other work. I've been looking for 4 months, and guess what? If I find a job that will be a dick about my free time, I have to take it.

      Work doesn't have to be fun. It's a means to an end: being able to take care of and feed yourself and your family. It's not your personal satisfaction center. That's nice if it is, but people used to understand that. A lot of this just sounds like whining to me.

      Spoken like management. There was a time when jobs offered benefits, job security, and respect for their employees.

    13. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by trbofly · · Score: 1

      I was trying to make a joke by insulting the general population of /. readers. Guess it didnt work.

      I expect a lot from my employees, however I am very honest with them about those expectations when I hire them. We rotate on-call and I expect them to answer when their week is up. If they dont like it, then dont take the job.

      If you ask my employees I hope they will tell you that our arrangement is not a huge impact to their lives.

      There seems to be a level of entitlement with most IT workers these days. You are correct that employment is a simple business contract. I expect those who choose to join my team to live up to that contract. Its sole purpose is to pay an employee to work for the sole benefit of the company.

      Personally I care about my employees. I hope they have a great family life and we do alot to make sure they have time to themselves, time off or half days when needed. Even telecommuting options for the developers. However professionally they are expected to fill their position to my expectations. If they do not want to be on-call or it impacts their life, move on.

      I am actually a really nice guy, but if I interview one more "Micro Skills" graduate who thinks they should be making 6 figures because thats what the TV ad told them, I will seriously go postal..

    14. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by MBCook · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm not management. I'm a 24 year old programmer. I'm not anyone's superior. A job is just a job. You think people loved working in coal mines? They did/do it because they have to. It puts food on the table. Some may like it, but they know it's hard work and has to be done. Good jobs offered benefits, security, and such. Mine does. But not all do. Pizza delivery people never got perks or job security.

      You're in a people business, and in those kind of jobs being able to be reached for things like scheduling changes are more important. My post was more aimed at people in corporate cultures who feel invaded by blackberries and such. Your position needs someone to do that. It could be a central secretary managing 15 people, or it can be you. Service jobs are different from white collar jobs.

      There are mitigating factors. The higher your salary/importance, the more this applies. Obviously a McDonald's burger flipper couldn't say this stuff if it applied to them, they would be replaced too easily.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    15. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by arivanov · · Score: 0

      "I'm only open 8-5, M-F"? People got sick when they got sick. Depends where are you. In the UK - hell yeah. It was that way and is that way. Here if your kid id in a comatose state with 40+C you will be asked to take it to the GP during the opening hours and will wait there for 2 hours until your appointment or until your kid needs to be ferried to AE in an ambulance. And the doctor visitng anybody besides pensioners at their home? Forget it.

      Other countries - definitely not. Completely different story. My granddad was a village GP for nearly 30 years. I remember visiting him as a kid. It was more than 15 years after he retired and there were still people knocking on the door in the middle of the night. Every time he stood up, put his old raincoat, got his old handbag in hand and went. The last time he did it was just a few weeks before he died. No "8-5. M-F", no "call the HotLine, I am unavailable".

      Both are cases at each end of the scale. The balance is somewhere in the middle. Work should not encroach onto your personal life beyond a certain limit. At the same time there are emergencies and they should be handled by everyone who can with some reasonable distribution of duties. It should not be piled up onto one person.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    16. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      even if you're an MD or something (where it's more likely that you really do need to be connected).

      At least MD's are traditionally excellently paid in exchange for being there to handle emergencies and other urgent situations.

      They also, at least later in life, are able to reduce their workload in other ways to compensate - like having office hours be 10-4 for routine stuff.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    17. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obviously a McDonald's burger flipper couldn't say this stuff if it applied to them, they would be replaced too easily.

      A McDonald's burger flipper probably gets paid an hourly rate, and I bet they expect more pay if they work more hours. It's ironic that in "better" jobs like those in IT, a culture has developed among a certain type of employer that "It's a salaried position" is an acceptable euphemism for "We own your soul, 24/7".

      As others have noted, the correct solution to this problem is for all the good people to collectively turn around and tell the over-demanding employers where to go. A competitive employment market works both ways, and good IT people are always worth far more to a business than their relative salary suggests. Except in the hardest of times (and usually only for a short while even then) these people will easily be able to find work with a more reasonable employer if they choose to look for it. Even the abusive employers know that, they just rely on people not bothering to look.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    18. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Spoken like management. There was a time when jobs offered benefits, job security, and respect for their employees.

      Hah! Obviously you haven't studied history much. That period was actually very unusual in history.

      It used to be that if you got hurt at work you'd lose your job. Likely become unemployed, or have to find another career or become a beggar if the injury wasn't temporary. Safety equipment was rare. We're talking about the heyday of railroads and 'big oil'.

      Unions, safety regulations, and some smart employers(Like Mr. Ford) combined with a labor crunch changed that, at least for a while.

      Then hiring US citizens became too expensive and stuff was outsourced to other countries where the old conditions prevailed because it was cheaper.

      I look for more or other work. I've been looking for 4 months, and guess what? If I find a job that will be a dick about my free time, I have to take it.

      If you want to change things, realize that you might have to move, get training to go into a different career field, change your income expectations, etc...

      Basically, you need to realize that it takes intelligent effort to get what you want.

      You do what it takes to keep a roof over your family's head, food in their mouths, shoes on their feet. After that, then you can work towards personal satisfaction. That's just how it is(or at least should be). That's what my grandparents did. That's what my parents did. That's what I do.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    19. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      If you work in an environment where you can't have frank and reasonable discussions with your employer about on-call hours, you should probably be looking for another job anyway.

      Some jobs you're just on-call by definition, and that's it. Every other job you should be able dicuss and negotiate that kind of thing to be within reasonable boundaries.

      If you can't, you're working for jackasses, and you'd be best off moving on anyway. So start looking. There are other jobs out there.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    20. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by alta · · Score: 1

      I'm the single sysadmin with a company that has 3x as many computers as people. I'm the only one that can fix MOST of our problems. On call is just part of life. The way I deal with it is with redundancy... I make everything as redundant as I possibly can. For a single low use website, that must be up all the time, I have 2 physical machines, each running a VMware guest as the web server. Each one is load balanced/failover with vrrp/pen. Each of those is plugged into a separate switch. Each switch into a firewall. The firewalls use vrrp, and will hot failover. Going further out, there's two ISP's, and I'm using dnsmadeeasy.com to load balance/failover between those. Now, when a machine, guest, firewall, switch, UPS, A/C or ISP goes down... I get a page, and I fix it the next day. It has greatly decreased the time I come in, while increasing uptime. We're on building generator, so we have redundant power. The only thing that I worry about at this point is fire.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    21. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by timbck2 · · Score: 1

      No Office, No Open Office even, no remote desktop, VNC, or other workarounds. That may work for you, but there are lots of folks (myself included) who actually have non-work-related reasons to use some of the software you named!
      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    22. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your "on call" theory and that is the way my company handles it. I may at my convenience reply to an email that needs action but I am not required or expected to when I am not in the office. When I am on call (every other week), I carry the on call pager and our support structure knows to call the on call pager if they need support from my level. I do not actually carry the physical pager we have though. Skytel allows you to forward the pager messages to various things and I forward them to my personal cell phone SMS which is the most convenient for me.

      Not everyone carries a BB to look cool and they are so common now that I think that cool thing has worn off. During the day it is great to have for email as I am always on the move around the office and I have a lot of my own stuff on it, like the new Google maps with GPS and signal positioning capabilities, GMail, Opera, and various other apps. I have a 8703 right now and the multimedia is lacking but good for everything else. I have these apps on my personal cell phone too but I like the full KB on the 8703 BB.

    23. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

      You talk of losing your job. But, the minute you are issued a device by your employer and told to be on-call (where presumably you were working regular hours before) the expectations and structure of your job are being radically revised. When you've established that, some level of negotiation seems only fair. Once you're negotiating, you just force your boss to either make sure you do the same amount of work at the end of the week, pay you more, or admit that they want you to do more work for the same amount of money, which tastes bad in anyone's mouth.

      This is all assuming your boss is not abusive or insane. In my opinion, every time you invoke, "But my boss is evil!" you've ended any reasonable debate.

    24. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      I concur that turning off the device solves the work/home balance issue. at home == off!

      --
      stuff |
    25. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      Pagers have been around for millenia, Blackberrys simply give better message.
      I don't think you know what the word millenia means.
    26. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      No, no. This is an employment issue. You could lose your job for "pushing back." Some people don't have that option.
      All employment is voluntary, in both directions. You work for your employer as long as it seems to be to your advantage, and your employer keeps you for as long as it seems to be to their advantage. If you don't like the terms of your employment - salary too low, hours too long, whatever - renegotiate or leave. If your employer's demands are genuinely unreasonable then they'll soon find the position unfilled and unfillable.

      Everyone always has the same choice, no matter how dire your straights. You always have the option of pushing back, even at the expense of your job. Whether that choice is worthwhile or not is entirely up to you - but it's still your choice to make.
      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    27. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My smartphone offers advantages for both parties - if it's after hours and something explodes, I'm reachable, but we have an agreement that you don't call unless you have to. I also get emails sometimes that aren't critical, but will become critical if I ignore them until the next morning (or Monday) - as a result, I might do a little work on the spot rather than spend a ton of time cleaning up the mess later (which I prefer, but if your stance is "9-5 and not a minute more," then the value of this may be lost). If I'm officially on vacation and really need to unplug, I can turn it off, leave it at home or go somewhere without cell coverage. On the flip side, I'm able to be a bit more flexible in my work hours - I can send an email from the golf course or elsewhere, meaning that I'm not 100% useless if I play hooky or take a long lunch every once in a while. In reality, with the Treo in hand I can do a large portion of my job from anywhere. I may be in a different situation than most b/c my boss is extremely accommodating and knows that we have lives outside of the underground cube farm. I'm permitted to use the phone for personal calls as well, so I don't have to carry multiple phones everywhere I go, and I get plenty of comp time on top of normal leave which I use to take long trips or just disappear for a couple weeks each year. So I guess what I'm saying is: Don't blame the phone - it comes down to a personal preference about how you spend your time and when you get the work done... because let's face it, you've got to do it eventually, right? :-)

    28. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but if you are the only one...

      IME, if your point is reasonable, you will not be the only one.

      A while ago, my (formerly small and privately owned) employer was bought out by a much larger corporation. One of the first things they did was try to change everyone's contract to their national standard boilerplate. Unfortunately, that boilerplate included clauses that affect life outside work. They required permission to get any additional paid work, even things like playing semi-pro musical gigs at your local bar for beer money, or tutoring a few kids for some extra cash. They claimed IP rights to everything you ever did, regardless of any connection to the employment. You get the idea.

      I think they thought I was just a lone whinger when I objected to these terms, which were a far cry from our previous, reasonably balanced contracts. They were wrong. In fact, a substantial proportion of the staff stood by me, either because they felt strongly about some or all of my points themselves once I'd drawn attention to them, or simply because they thought I was being reasonable and were showing solidarity with fellow staff. I can't remember how many people got fired during the whole exercise, but let's just say they were all in HR and the offending contractual areas were changed back.

      Now, if your point is unreasonable and you really are just being selfish given the job you signed up for, no-one will back you up. You'll have to put up or get out, and I doubt your employer will care because they'll find someone more reasonable to replace you. But if all you're asking is for a fair deal, you might be surprised about how many of your colleagues will stand with you when it comes to crunch time.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    29. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by ibbie · · Score: 1

      Right on. Don't put up with too crap. Especially if you are younger, they'll bully you into bending over for them. Also live your real life without Office on your computer.
      [...]
      No Office, No Open Office even, no remote desktop, VNC, or other workarounds.
      Right, because it's more hip to track your income and purchases using sticky notes. Does Leopard come with overdraft protection? (;
      --
      The wise follow a damned path, for to know is to be forsaken.
    30. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I only partially agree. I used to work for a large bank in their network security design group. The employer made it easy for us to be available 24x7 by providing us with laptops, paying for our cell phones and home broadband connectivity, and at least partially paying to furnish home office space. The downside was an expectation that you would be available 24x7, even when on "vacation." (It was not unusual for people to call each other about work matters even when the people being called were officially on vacation.) Towards the end of my time there I resisted this, and the amount of time I spent working dropped.

      Did it drop enough? You tell me. For the last three months I was there, I averaged 55 hours/week... but that brought the group average down, so I got verbally counseled for it. The group (about 50 people or so) was averaging 80 hours/week, largely because of a couple of contractors who were logging about 100 hours/week . Trim the outliers (contractors at one end, me at the other) and you still wind up with some pretty long work weeks.

      Yes, the employees contributed to the problem, by tolerating the conditions. However, they weren't the sole cause, as the employer made it no secret that they would just as soon shitcan you if you "whined" about working more than 50 hours/week, and the market made it difficult to find similar paying work elsewhere.

    31. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by peterpi · · Score: 1

      True. When I worked at McD's (11 years ago), we clocked in and out. Our pay was accurate to the minute. Maybe even to the second, I don't know. This was good; as soon as your shift finished they wanted you to leave. Overtime was paid.

      Maybe this is different for different franchises.

      (This was in the UK)

    32. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't have my password at work, so ac it is.

      I've been the only one because the other people were scared. It's a risk.

      I'm an admin. I had a 2 hour personal lecture about letting down the team, being a bastard, etc. I was promised time-in-lieu (which I wasn't getting). All I asked was to be paid. They even lied, saying it was in my contract that I work for free on call. Uh-hum...that time, they backed down. It could have easily gone the other way, and I would have lost my job at a time when I couldn't get another one easily (if at all).

      My point - you made your choice. I understand, but half the blame is still yours. When I was younger, I worked in a warehouse with the same problem and it would have been bad with a job loss. In the end, when I was younger, I understand they fired almost everyone and automated the job, but I'd left for another job by this time.

      I do question your less-than-sustainable pay though. I saved money on a $4/hour job to pay for university courses, while working full time (40 hours) *and* attending school full time. No loans. Paying rent. I sold my car, ate cheap, stopped drinking, no cable, very little sleep - all for 3 years while I dug my way up. It was worth it.

      There are *always* ways to live cheaper here. They aren't fun, but you *do* have options. I have no pity for you if you live in North America.

    33. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by pla · · Score: 1

      No, no. This is an employment issue. You could lose your job for "pushing back."

      My own personal solution works well enough - When I get home from work, I have a beer.

      Of course, I can't really use that excuse at 9am on Saturday (without looking like a hardcore alkie), but any day, any time after early afternoon...

      "Gee, I'd love to help - Send a taxi, and I'll come right in! Say, can you send a lime with the taxi? I've run out."



      Some people don't have that option.

      You always have that option, with the possible exception of serving in the military. If your job sucks enough that you can't negotiate the details of "pager duty", you already need new employment, you just haven't made the leap yet.

    34. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Omestes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your reason confuses me, and its sad I see it so much here on /.

      It seems the average slashbot has decided regression equals progress. I don't see how increasing employer culpability, and the environment of the worker was an undesirable, nor do I see how the opposite is in any way a good thing (unless you some sociopath only concerned with the bottom line, and not the stuff that matters).

      Yes we've had workers rights for a small period of time, but I don't see that as a reason for its desired transience. Most cultures, too, have only seen the abolition of slavery, suffrage, and the germ theory of disease for a short period of time too, would be be so apathetic about losing them too?

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    35. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1
      And yet in spite of what you say, you still set boundaries...

      (Except my private motorcycle times when the weather is warm)
    36. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by tepples · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to be on call, don't take a job that expects you to be on call. Good luck in the fast food industry.

      You could negotiate for something ("You want me to start being on call, that's an expansion in my responsibilities, will my compensation go up as well?"). Your compensation has already gone up: "We're paying you $30 per hour for the 40 hours per week that you spend in the office. That's the same as $7.50 for each hour that you're on call. You as an employee receive the benefit of having to show up in one office as opposed to having to work multiple jobs with multiple employers."
    37. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I agree, I find my blackberry much more freeing. I can read all my emails on the subway and get an extra hour of communiation with my team mate (we have very flexible schedules so I come in normally 2 hours before him and he leaves 2 hours after me). With the blackberry I can answer emails on the commute home and can respond to a time sensitive but easy request at other times.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    38. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by joss · · Score: 1

      > Here if your kid id in a comatose state with 40+C you will be asked to take it to the GP during the opening hours

      You must live in a shitty district. In Oxford that's not my experience at all,
      I call, a Dr calls back within 20 minutes, we talk, if its moderately
      serious the kid gets seen typically within an 1.5 hrs [on a Sunday say].
      If its really serious they send an ambulance, otherwise I have to take them
      to a special clinic, but its pretty prompt. I don't know where else you
      have lived, but compared to my experience with healthcare in US [even with insurance],
      the NHS is pretty good these days.

      --
      http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    39. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by caluml · · Score: 1

      In the UK - hell yeah. It was that way and is that way. Here if your kid id in a comatose state with 40+C you will be asked to take it to the GP during the opening hours and will wait there for 2 hours until your appointment or until your kid needs to be ferried to AE in an ambulance. And the doctor visitng anybody besides pensioners at their home? Forget it. It's not quite that bad. If you ring your Dr's surgery out of hours, there'll be details of who you can ring if you have a problem. There's NHS Direct for over the phone advice. And most cities have Walk-in centres. Failing that, if you think it's serious enough, take your kid to A + E.
      Don't be so dramatic.
    40. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by tepples · · Score: 1

      Also live your real life without Office on your computer. Right, because it's more hip to track your income and purchases using sticky notes. Are you trying to imply that Microsoft is the only provider of personal finance software?
    41. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by caluml · · Score: 1

      Ooops, not walk-in centres. This is what I was looking for.

    42. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      And their emergencies are true emergencies- without a doctor, someone may die. Not like an IT emergency, where an item may not appear on the website for a few hours, or we may lose some money (maybe, if they don't just come back the next morning).I'd have no problem being on call if lives are on the line, but for money? Fuck that.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    43. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by profquad · · Score: 1

      Hah! Obviously you haven't studied history much. That period was actually very unusual in history.

      Workers being treated with respect is more commonly thought of as progress. If you'd rather go back the the more "usual" parts of history, blackberries wouldn't be the least of your concerns.

      If you want to change things, realize that you might have to move, get training to go into a different career field, change your income expectations, etc...

      Let them eat cake! oh wait, you mean lower your income expectations.

      Basically, you need to realize that it takes intelligent effort to get what you want.

      Zing!

      You do what it takes to keep a roof over your family's head, food in their mouths, shoes on their feet. After that, then you can work towards personal satisfaction. That's just how it is(or at least should be). That's what my grandparents did. That's what my parents did. That's what I do.

      If only I had Old Glory here to wipe away my tears.. You are a very fortunate person to have parents and even grandparents that were able to live comfortably enough to take those professional leaps and educate their children for the dangerous gun-riddled world that wants to kill them and take their hard-earned money. I think if you don't fully grasp the weight of that, there's no way I can convince you.

      It is not the employer's job to run their employees into the ground, and a system demanding such inhumanity is just as failed.
    44. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by kalpol · · Score: 1

      I worked at Mcdonald's 18-20 years ago in the US, and it was the same way. Labor costs tightly controlled, so much so that occasionalyl in slow periods they asked you to clock out and take a break for a while.

      --
      12:50 - press return.
    45. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Safiiru · · Score: 1

      You think people loved working in coal mines? They did/do it because they have to.

      Well, sometimes they went on strike. Fought with owners/management over working conditions. Occasionally fought with the government when it tried to clamp down on unions.

      Not that I'm really going anywhere with this, but history does deserve mention.

    46. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by trbofly · · Score: 1

      I do set my own boundaries. You are completely correct.

      In my opinion those are my personal boundaries though. If the company called and expected my help during my private time, I wouldnt complain. I would either bust my butt to get back or I would decide it wasnt worth it.

      I think that what I am trying to say is that I dont agree with those saying the company is at fault. I dont agree with the feeling entitlement employees have that the company should not impact their private time. If they dont like it, get a new job. The company has one responsibility and that is to the owner or the shareholders.

      I personally enforce boundaries for my employees because I think that makes a good boss. I try not to impact them because I like them to be happy with their situation. But if I need them and it is afterhours they have no place to complain.

      Thats all though.

      t.

    47. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sigh...

      I'm not talking about what employers should or should not be doing. I'm talking about what YOU should be doing to support your family. It's an acknowledgement of reality, not a statement of how things should be. Should employers be required to have a safe working enviroment, and be held liable if they don't? Yes, they should. But 'should' doesn't necessarily cut it in the real world. It can be far too late by the time the court system finishes going through the evidence.

      It's along my beliefs about self reliance and prepardness. I believe that YOU are your own first and last line of defense against the harsh unfairness that is the world. This extends to your family; most importantly your children(1).

      You're your own first line of defense because you're always there. When the incident occurs, emergency response units like the police, fire department, EMTs can be only minutes away when seconds matter. Better yet, if your defense(2) succeeds, the emergency responders are free to help somebody else. This can result in a save for somebody who's first line fails.

      You're your own last line of defense for a different reason: You're the one with the most to lose if you fail. Your own life, sanity, health, etc...

      Yes we've had workers rights for a small period of time, but I don't see that as a reason for its desired transience. Most cultures, too, have only seen the abolition of slavery, suffrage, and the germ theory of disease for a short period of time too, would be be so apathetic about losing them too?

      There's worker's rights, and then there's worker's rights. Personally, I think that employee and employer relations should mostly be contract based. For example, in France you actually get demonstrations occasionally where employees are protesting to be allowed to work more.

      Personally, I'd expect workcenters to be as safe as reasonably possible(3). Working hours to be agreed upon before hand, and if on-call status is required for unexpected work, that that be worked out before hand. Benefits agreed upon, etc...

      40 hour work week? Fairly recent innovation, and France has a 30 hour one. Some people are willing to work longer hours than others, especially for more money. Why should they be forced to circumvent some restriction by working two or more jobs, frequently for less money?

      Living wage? How do you define a 'living wage'? Would you rather be unemployed than working for a sub-living wage, if no employer determines that your work is worth what you consider a living wage?
      Healthcare? Personally, I'd rather be paid to obtain my own healthcare that I can keep if I move jobs. Or even a single-payer system like Canada. Anything but our current boondoggle.

      (1)Though even then the kid's his own first and last, but being incapable(especially in the case of a baby), you're up next. It's part of the tragedy that is parental abuse.
      (2)I'm being very generic here.
      (3) Racing, for example, will never be 100% safe. But drivers know the risks rather well. Same with fishing, flying, etc...

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    48. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by big_paul76 · · Score: 1

      "Unions, safety regulations, and some smart employers(Like Mr. Ford) combined with a labor crunch changed that, at least for a while. Then hiring US citizens became too expensive and stuff was outsourced to other countries where the old conditions prevailed because it was cheaper."

      That's one way of looking at it. Another way of looking at it is that as trade barriers were reduced, our system of "globalization" has essentially institutionalized what we used to call "dumping".

      The combination of trade treaties and telecommunications has made it easy for employers/companies to shop around for a jurisdiction. Somehow, we in North America have been convinced that the destruction of our manufacturing sector in exchange for cheap chinese-manufactured goods at wal-mart is a good deal.

      You know when guys like Adam Smith were writing, it was assumed, it went without saying, that labor was mobile and capital (mostly was in the form of land back then) wasn't. Now, capital is mobile and labor isn't. That's probably worth thinking about.

      --
      The plural form of "anecdote" is "anecdotes", not "evidence".
    49. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For example, in France you actually get demonstrations occasionally where employees are protesting to be allowed to work more.
      That's news to me, and I lived there for two years.
    50. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Town doctor in the 1800s? No difference now, except you get a phone call instead of a bleeding huddle on your doorstep.

      I think better and better communications will eventually result in a return to our original work arrangements. Everyone is a contractor, or artisan, if you prefer, with particular skills to offer. When someone needs something done, they find the person who can do it. If you need your horse shod, you go to the blacksmith. If you need a club fashioned, you go to the guy who makes the best clubs. There isn't one of these artificial delineations between work and personal life. You don't go in to a job every day and pretend to be a slave for eight hours, then go home and resume being a citizen.

      Some of these ideas are nicely explored in The Hacker Ethic.

    51. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      "A McDonald's burger flipper probably gets paid an hourly rate, and I bet they expect more pay if they work more hours. It's ironic that in "better" jobs like those in IT, a culture has developed among a certain type of employer that "It's a salaried position" is an acceptable euphemism for "We own your soul, 24/7".

      This is wrong thinking IMHO. Why NOT be an hourly worker for IT? Do like I did, incorporate yourself (I did an "S" corp), and the do corp-to-corp contracting. It need not be a few months here and there too, you can land longer term gigs. It involves a little more paperwork on your side (managing your own 'salary', SE taxes, etc), but, it is worth it in the long run. You can set up HSA's, sock money away in some IRA's, write off your mileage to/from jobsite from your home office ($0.485/mi for 2007)...etc.

      In the long run, you make and save MUCH more money, and you don't have to put up with the political crap at work either. And really....you have all these benefits, and yet STILL retain pretty much the same relationship you had as a direct employee, in that there still is NO job security, NO loyalty by employer, etc.

      You're not losing anything by doing this, the days of the job forever are gone...so, you might as well bargain on a corp-to-corp level (more equal), and spell out exactly what you will and won't do, and make good money for your efforts.

      My motto since doing this..."I do NOT work for free".

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    52. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "It seems the average slashbot has decided regression equals progress. I don't see how increasing employer culpability, and the environment of the worker was an undesirable, nor do I see how the opposite is in any way a good thing (unless you some sociopath only concerned with the bottom line, and not the stuff that matters)."

      Your answer intrigues me. You associate being a sociopath with being only concerned for the bottom line...as a worker.

      What do you consider to be an 'important' thing in a job? Personaly? I ONLY work in order to earn a paycheck. If I were independently wealthy, I can assure you, I'd never work again, I have plenty of interests to fill my time.

      What is a job, except a means to earn a living? Aside from maybe a few things, where you have a 'calling' (minister, etc), I can't think of much.

      I prefer to contract work. I negotiate for money and exactly what I'll do and what is expected of me. I never work an hour for free. I like the freedom to earn and invest my money as I please.

      I guess some people still for some reason, let themselves partially or totally be defined by their work/job, and I've never understood that. The employers don't respect you for that, never have.....so, why are you trying to work so hard at a one sided relationship?

      I almost liken it to a woman staying with an abusive spouse. Wake up, realize what the situation is...

      Your post seems to express pretty much the opposite of what I've stated...can you expand on your opinions here more?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    53. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      Here if your kid id in a comatose state with 40+C you will be asked to take it to the GP during the opening hours and will wait there for 2 hours until your appointment or until your kid needs to be ferried to AE in an ambulance. And the doctor visitng anybody besides pensioners at their home? Forget it.

      There's hyperbole and there's just... wrong. If your kid is comatose, why don't you ring 999?

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    54. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I don't work for free even as a full-time employee. :-)

      But I have a lot of sympathy for your views. The only reason I haven't already gone the contractor/consultant route is hesitation about getting the first few safe jobs on the books. Everyone who's been there seems to advise doing this before giving up the day job, but it seems quite difficult to know where to start until you've got the time from giving up the day job to invest in client-hunting. :-(

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    55. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by syousef · · Score: 1

      Pagers have been around for millenia

      Why just the other day I was reading about how Julius Caesar might have avoided death if he'd taken the time to read his pager.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    56. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      I'm in a salaried position and have been for the past decade or so. None of the people I've worked for ever acted like they owned me 24x7, and I was always careful to communicate what they could expect from me and what I expected from them.

      I find that most of these issues are particular to the culture of a company, rather than that company's policies. For example, where I work it is common for people on vacation to take their laptops, crackberries, etc. with them, sometimes even participating in conference calls. The way I see it, if they can't live without you for a couple weeks, what better time to renegotiate your salary? So I don't do that, and you know what? No one has ever said a word to me about it.

      Communication tools can be used to place chains around employee's necks, but in my experience it's mostly the employees putting them on themselves, or perhaps meekly accepting them instead of actually stating a preference. It's perfectly ok to push back in a professional manner.

      Of course, this is /., where I once read rants about how Google is evil for giving their employees free meals and commuter wifi access, which encourages them to work more. Of course they are going to encourage you to work more. That doesn't mean you need to take all your meals at your desk, or start debugging code while still on your way to work.

      Work-life balance belongs in your hands as much as the company's.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    57. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by syousef · · Score: 1

      Then hiring US citizens became too expensive and stuff was outsourced to other countries where the old conditions prevailed because it was cheaper.

      Some would say if we want a civilized society, making those conditions that make US citizens too expensive universal is what we should be aiming for, rather than pulling away those protections and moving back to a fend for yourself law of the jungle situation. Having some protection by society is a good thing.

      Do YOU really want to live in a society where if you get hurt at work, you end up a beggar? Do you know what it's like in some of the countries you're talking about? Can you blame a guy for wanting to kill you for $5 if that is all that stands between him and starvation (or worse his family starving)?

      If you want to change things, realize that you might have to move, get training to go into a different career field, change your income expectations, etc...

      If you're stuck in a badly paid position, moving is almost never an option. Moving costs money. Much moreso if you've got a family.

      You do what it takes to keep a roof over your family's head, food in their mouths, shoes on their feet. After that, then you can work towards personal satisfaction. That's just how it is(or at least should be). That's what my grandparents did. That's what my parents did. That's what I do

      Oh I see, you'd like to go back to the good old days. Why not extend it just a few more decades. You know, when women died in childbirth, immunization didn't exist, your job was one of indentured servitude, and if you fell ill or were injured through no fault of your own you'd end up homeless. You've got no idea what it was like to live even a couple of centuries ago, and clearly you have zero idea how fortunate you are. To suggest that moving back towards the systems that existed decades or even a century ago is asinine, and suggests that you're spoilt. Oh and fuck slashdot for modding this stupid rant as insightful.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    58. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the average slashbot has decided regression equals progress.

      The comment to which you responded does not fit that description. It was a reply specifically to the observation that "there was a time when jobs offered benefits, job security, and respect for their employees." Historically speaking that was indeed an anomaly, and one which did not occur without people fighting for it. Unions are remarkably absent from the IT industry, and most individuals are not willing to stand up for their rights. Voters vote for whoever promises to fix the economy, regardless of the recurring pattern that fixing the economy involves giving more leeway to businesses. The people get what they work and fight for. They work for money to buy Chinese merchandise and they fight to keep a job, any job. In the face of that, lamenting about how employers don't offer benefits, job security and respect for their employees anymore is utterly pointless.

    59. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


      >You do what it takes to keep a roof over your family's head, food in their mouths, shoes on their feet. After that, then you can work towards personal satisfaction.

      The key is that you striving to do it at the same time. Not one first and then another.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    60. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Workers being treated with respect is more commonly thought of as progress. If you'd rather go back the the more "usual" parts of history, blackberries wouldn't be the least of your concerns.

      I never said that I want to go back to that system. However, as much as I'd like to get a car that gets 200mpg per gallon of water, it's not going to happen.

      Besides, I don't see us going back to that system. Fortuantly there are many employers that have figured out that treating employees well is in their best interest. Not all have, however. The best recourse, as I see it, is to have an aware and mobile work force, such that employers who don't treat their employees good end up with no labor, and thus end up out of business.

      You are a very fortunate person to have parents and even grandparents that were able to live comfortably enough to take those professional leaps and educate their children

      I have parents and grandparents that sacrificed in order for me to be where I am today. Even my great-grandparents did so. Live comfortably enough? My grandparents didn't have running water until after my mother had moved out of the house. My grandparents went hungry a few times to ensure that my parents got what they needed.

      dangerous gun-riddled world that wants to kill them and take their hard-earned money.

      Gunriddled indeed. My grandfather on my father's side makes his living hunting and trapping. My grandfather on my mother's side had to commit violence on more than one occasion.

      We grew up learning that the world, especially people on it, aren't always nice or fair. That you just have to deal with it as best as you can.

      Was I lucky? Darn tootin - I already beat the odds by being born in the USA. Most of the world's population is in worse circumstances.

      It is not the employer's job to run their employees into the ground, and a system demanding such inhumanity is just as failed.

      In a system with a relatively expensive and restrained labor pool(ie there are more jobs than people to fill them), it becomes in the interest of the employer to conserve their labor pool by treating their workers right.

      Given the way modern society works, I figure that China and India will start running into labor shortages sooner or later. It'll still take years, but it'll happen. Then their wages will start rising even faster, outsourcing won't be profitable any more, and US jobs will stop stagnating.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    61. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The combination of trade treaties and telecommunications has made it easy for employers/companies to shop around for a jurisdiction. Somehow, we in North America have been convinced that the destruction of our manufacturing sector in exchange for cheap chinese-manufactured goods at wal-mart is a good deal.

      Technically, it is. Our employment figures are still rather high, after all. There are some losers, but not everybody lost.

      Now, China is currently the big winner right now, the outsourcing of labor is helping them raise their population out of 3rd world status.

      One consequence is the stagnation of US wages though, I'm somewhat surprised that they're not falling behind more than they are. I figure I can only hope that we remain merely stagnant until China and India start running short on labor, expenses go up, and outsourcing is no longer profitable.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    62. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Note on the losing money part - If I decide that time and a half, or even something like 'double time if I have to work between 11 pm to 6 am', is sufficient compensation for coming in, If the company's willing to pay it due to a website outage, that'll count as an emergency for me.

      The trick is to make sure that it's at least somewhat painful for the company, so they only bother with serious stuff.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    63. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      True, and probably fair if its laid out that on call is required at the time you negotiate the job. But for myself, having done it before- they'd have to pay me 7 figures a year to do it again voluntarily. For less it would literally need to be that job or starvation. I just don't need money that badly.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    64. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Informative
      "But I have a lot of sympathy for your views. The only reason I haven't already gone the contractor/consultant route is hesitation about getting the first few safe jobs on the books. Everyone who's been there seems to advise doing this before giving up the day job, but it seems quite difficult to know where to start until you've got the time from giving up the day job to invest in client-hunting. :-("

      You can start half way. 1st thing...look into incorporating yourself, it doesn't cost much. A friend of mine did it mostly himself for a few $$, I paid a lawyer about $250 or so, gave him a company name, and in 2 weeks I was a company. I went the "S" corp route, many will advise the LLC, but, do some research see which fits best for you. I like the S since I only have to pay SE taxes (SS and medicare) on the portion of my money that I make that I pay myself as a 'reasonable' W2 salary. Saves money that way.

      But, in the meantime...look at job shops...you can start at some that will employ you as a contract employee...they get a big cut, but, it will easy you into the mkt....they find the jobs for you, etc. You can even start with places like this as a W2 employee of them, with full benefits...but, I'd not go that far, too close to being an employee.

      Anyway, save up some $$....do a little research, and then, look for a contract employment co...and let them find your work for you till you get comfy with doing it yourself.

      If you're a US citizen, look into places that do govt. work....those can be long term and you might can get on as a sub on a project.

      Take a look here for good info LINK . Click the link for the 'original site', and read that if the main stuff is still under construction....

      Good luck...the only thing scary about it is...that it is different, and you do take on a bit more responsibility for yourself...but,think of it, most people in the early days of the US did much the same thing, just in a more primitive time.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    65. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Some would say if we want a civilized society, making those conditions that make US citizens too expensive universal is what we should be aiming for, rather than pulling away those protections and moving back to a fend for yourself law of the jungle situation. Having some protection by society is a good thing.

      Oddly enough, the best way to do this is to encourage stuff like outsourcing; outsourcing helps dry up the labor market in the receiving country, increases the economy - helping to point the country towards the labor shortages that improved working conditions in the USA.

      Do YOU really want to live in a society where if you get hurt at work, you end up a beggar? Do you know what it's like in some of the countries you're talking about? Can you blame a guy for wanting to kill you for $5 if that is all that stands between him and starvation (or worse his family starving)?
      Nope, somewhat, and I'd happily shoot him down; but would rather he get a job, even if it only pays enough for the extreme basics.

      'Sweatshop wages' often are better than the alternative.

      If you're stuck in a badly paid position, moving is almost never an option. Moving costs money. Much moreso if you've got a family.

      Yet people find ways. They found ways during the potato famine, Iraqies managed to find ways to get out of the country, etc... In multiple areas you had people move between continents with only the clothes on their back.

      Oh I see, you'd like to go back to the good old days

      No effing way. You offer me a time machine to the past, I'm going to decline it. We live better today than we ever have in the past. What I was talking about though, is reality. You take care of the basics first, doing what you have to do. THEN you work towards personal gratification(ie perks).

      If your kids are hungry, the social security office is dragging their feet and the only job you can get is bussing tables - then you bus tables until you can get something better. You pawn your TV if necessary. Etc...

      When I talked about 'how it should be', I was meaning that some parents take gratification over their kid's needs - which isn't 'how it should be'. Vegetables come before beer on the shopping list.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    66. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      Get with the program -- the new paradigm is to become your own boss - contract your work and do what you love (and therefore do very well indeed) instead of being an employee.

      In the next 10 years or so companies are going to have to play ball, because there will just not be enough of us to do all the work that needs to be done after the boomers retire.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    67. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the extra thoughts. Unfortunately as I'm in the UK, not all of it will apply to me personally, though I'm sure it will be of interest to others thinking similarly in the US as well.

      The thing that concerns me the most right now is that even though I work in a relatively high-tech city, and could find many potentially interesting jobs as a full-time employee, there's definitely a trend here for the companies to want in-house staff only: many of their web sites' job pages explicitly state that they aren't looking for contractors or some similar restriction. The kind of contract employment agencies you mentioned sound like a good way to start out, but I'm not sure we have many around right now (or maybe we do, but I just don't know where to find them).

      Anyway, thanks again for the comments. I'll keep your suggestions in mind as I look for good opportunities to go freelance.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    68. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by syousef · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, the best way to do this is to encourage stuff like outsourcing; outsourcing helps dry up the labor market in the receiving country, increases the economy - helping to point the country towards the labor shortages that improved working conditions in the USA.

      Rather than clever, I find that logic completely backwards. While you're busy trying to dry up a massive labour market, your own country's market languishes and suffers. Great for the employer in the short term. They pay less as they've just increased supply by orders of magnitude. Meanwhile you've not even made a dent fixing their economy..

      The only way to do it is to legislate that work done for an employer in a particular company (directly or otherwise) is to be paid above a certain minimum wage. Competition should be above that minimum wage. Unfortunately the directly or otherwise part is notoriously difficult to police.

      'Sweatshop wages' often are better than the alternative.

      A slippery slope argument. If you accept this you must also accept that the vast majority of the world's people will end up earning slave wages within the next few decades. As you introduce sweatshop wages to replace those worse conditions, the rest of the world has to compete with those sweatshop wages. Pretty soon only sweat shop wages are competitive. I don't accept this. If you have children, nieces, nephews or just kids you care about neither should you.

      Usually the people that use this weak argument have a lot to gain from paying sweat shop wages.

      Yet people find ways. They found ways during the potato famine, Iraqies managed to find ways to get out of the country, etc... In multiple areas you had people move between continents with only the clothes on their back.

      Lovely image of the future you have there. Regardless they have to have somewhere better to run to. If you accept slave labour (as you have above) there will be nowhere as markets globalize increasingly. Also you're suggesting that acts of heroism that have become notworthy in history, and incredible pain and sacrifice should be the accepted norm. Yet it's only the survivors that get to tell their stories? How many died in the potato famine? How many Iraqies were killed and are still being killed? How many didn't make it. You seem to think a law of the jungle survival of the fitest evolutionary approach is good, yet what makes you think that under those circumstances you and those around you will shine? How many die not because they make bad choices but because the circumstances are overwhelming?

      We live better today than we ever have in the past. What I was talking about though, is reality. You take care of the basics first, doing what you have to do. THEN you work towards personal gratification(ie perks).

      Your approach would see us move towards the past as people make less and less money and instead of having to sacrifice perks and luxury items they have to sacrifice decent food, education and medical care

      When I talked about 'how it should be', I was meaning that some parents take gratification over their kid's needs - which isn't 'how it should be'. Vegetables come before beer on the shopping list.

      On this one point we completely agree. People are all too willing to put their own selfish wants above those of their family. (Just yesterday I was disgusted by a pregant woman with a toddler in tow lighting up!!!). People seem to think that if they have to give anything up in a relationship or to have a family there must be something wrong. We completely agree that your needs and those of your family if you have one should come way above playstations and booze.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    69. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Thanks for the extra thoughts. Unfortunately as I'm in the UK, not all of it will apply to me personally, though I'm sure it will be of interest to others thinking similarly in the US as well."

      Ooh...yeah, I think I even heard in the UK, that they have some laws that actually impede or try to keep you from doing the indie contractor thing....not directly against being indie, but, that the laws make it harder than they should, and harder to make the $$ you need to make if doing it indie.

      Good luck....post up if you jump into it!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    70. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm very sad for you if you really only work for the paycheck. If you don't understand that sadness now, then I doubt you ever will, especially given your example of an abusive relationship. How bad is your job?

    71. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      FWIW, you might be thinking of IR35. This was basically there to close a tax loophole, but the fix was badly implemented (whether deliberately or through incompetence is left as an exercise for the reader) such that it pretty much screwed legitimate private contractors in various fields as well, IT being one of the more obvious ones. A whole load of people who used to work on contract turned permanent when it came in. It's not a show-stopper, but it does make private work less appealing on the financial side.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    72. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by fatlaces · · Score: 1

      Yeah whatever. My hipness is incidental to my laid backness.

      I am saying it could be nice to stay away from some software called Office, if you want to keep the office out of your real life.

    73. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      It's happened, but is, of course, far smaller demonstrations than those demanding more benefits or even shorter hours.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    74. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by shiftless · · Score: 1

      These people weren't born slaves. How did they become one if not because of their own decisions and actions?

    75. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you on this.

      While I'm not about to say that you're not going to get stuck working on something you don't like; however it should be a positive experience on the whole.

      Why? You spend 40 hours a week at a job, probably another 10 hours to get ready and to/from and take lunch in the middle.

      50 hours a week, out of 16 waking hours a day, 7 days a week for a total of 112. That's nearly half!

      Now, I can't put a dollar value on happiness and fulfillment, that's up to the individual.

      And, of course, he might be in that lower bracket where he's still concerned about fulfilling the basics - in which case he's doing what he has to do in order to get by.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    76. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Rather than clever, I find that logic completely backwards. While you're busy trying to dry up a massive labour market, your own country's market languishes and suffers. Great for the employer in the short term. They pay less as they've just increased supply by orders of magnitude. Meanwhile you've not even made a dent fixing their economy..

      Look at China. Look at India. I wouldn't call those dents. And yes, it's great for the employer in the short term. In the long term it works out for everybody as the economy of the world as a whole increases.

      The only way to do it is to legislate that work done for an employer in a particular company (directly or otherwise) is to be paid above a certain minimum wage. Competition should be above that minimum wage. Unfortunately the directly or otherwise part is notoriously difficult to police.

      This is just protectionalism again - If you mandate a high wage, the jobs don't move, and the peasant who'd gladly take that 'sweatshop' job rather than work in the fields like his ancestors have done for thousands of years.

      Please note that when I'm talking about 'sweatshop' stuff I'm talking about stuff that pays wages that outrage americans. But when you dig into them, you find out that the people working in the factory or whatever are actually making multiples of what they were previously - normally subsidence farmers. As a result of the increased pay and moves away from farming, additional services end up appearing - taking even more farmers out of the fields. Frequently the farmers end up being able to sell their products for more, allowing them to automate to increase production even more. It ends up being a positive circle.

      If you accept slave labour (as you have above)

      No, I haven't. Where did I talk about forcing people to work, trading and selling them?

      A slippery slope argument. If you accept this you must also accept that the vast majority of the world's people will end up earning slave wages within the next few decades. As you introduce sweatshop wages to replace those worse conditions, the rest of the world has to compete with those sweatshop wages. Pretty soon only sweat shop wages are competitive. I don't accept this. If you have children, nieces, nephews or just kids you care about neither should you.

      Sigh... Even as there's a downward pressure on wages in well paid areas like the USA there's an upward pressure on wages in the low wage areas. Once development takes hold, wages tend to increase there as the job/population ratio increases. In addition, higher economy allows for higher education - increasing wages more.

      Your approach would see us move towards the past as people make less and less money and instead of having to sacrifice perks and luxury items they have to sacrifice decent food, education and medical care

      Again, it's not my 'approach'. It's reality. There is downward pressure on US wages due to outsourcing to China/India. The outsourcing has also resulting in upward pressure in those areas, though it's more evident in India than China. China still has a good amount of former subsidence farmers for cheap labor.

      We completely agree that your needs and those of your family if you have one should come way above playstations and booze.

      Thank you.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    77. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Megaport · · Score: 1

      Too complex dude. Redundancy doesn't mean what you think it means.

      -M

      --
      # grep slashdot access.log | grep html | sort | uniq | wc -l 2604
    78. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by syousef · · Score: 1

      Look at China. Look at India. I wouldn't call those dents. And yes, it's great for the employer in the short term. In the long term it works out for everybody as the economy of the world as a whole increases.

      Yep standard of living goes up a tiny bit for far flung countries. Meanwhile people in your own countries see their standard of living plumet.

      This is just protectionalism again - If you mandate a high wage, the jobs don't move, and the peasant who'd gladly take that 'sweatshop' job rather than work in the fields like his ancestors have done for thousands of years

      First of all that's rubbish. Mandate a high wage and everyone competes on merit. It means you have to raise people's standard of living enough in the 3rd world country for them to be able to afford an education and compete against people in your own country. That is not a bad thing. That makes for real competition, instead of outsourcing jobs to people who can't actually do them because they work 16 hours a day and can't afford much more than food.

      Secondly what you're proposing is moving everyone out of the fields and into the sweat shops. This is bunk. It does nothing for society or humanity whatsoever. We need farmers. They should be paid reasonably well. The techniques may need to move to something more mechanized to increase output and support the world of today, but there's nothing wrong with farming.

      Please note that when I'm talking about 'sweatshop' stuff I'm talking about stuff that pays wages that outrage americans. But when you dig into them, you find out that the people working in the factory or whatever are actually making multiples of what they were previously - normally subsidence farmers

      If you take someone that's paid $1 a week and pay them $4 a week, they're still not going to be able to live a good life. They may break the barrier to supporting themselves for basic food, but don't kid yourself about them getting decent medical care if they fall ill. Forget decent education too. All they'll be taught to do is some repedative task until a machine is developed that is good enough (read cheap enough) to replace them. If one isn't developed they've got a job for life (or until they get sick or hurt, whichever comes first) with nearly zero prospect of improving that life, and near zero prospect of improvement. Make no mistake you're not doing them a favour. You're USING them in the worst way and expect to throw them away as soon as the business proposition means its easier. In order to better yourself you have to have enough time away from your job, and enough money to persue skills that will be paid higher. Most sweat shops make sure their workforce can't move on - it's in their best interest to keep training costs down. Now a sick or injured employee is an even bigger liability so in that case they will retrain someone because it's cheaper. The entire idea that this kind of MODERN SLAVERY is better than the alternative is a bunch of shit people with money tell themselves so they can employ such foul tactics and sleep at night.

      As a result of the increased pay and moves away from farming, additional services end up appearing - taking even more farmers out of the fields. Frequently the farmers end up being able to sell their products for more, allowing them to automate to increase production even more. It ends up being a positive circle.

      OH fucking give me a break. When's the last time you heard of a subsistence farmer being able to own any portion of the profit automation brings (either in a factory job or in the field)? The farmer can't afford the machinery to do anything like this. What fucking fantasy world are you living in? Show me the story of 3rd world business farmer becomes rich (without doing something illegal and immoral like selling drugs or running a racket). You are either kidding yourself or being deceitful.

      No, I haven't. Where did I talk about forcing people to work, trading and selling them?

      Yeah some choice. You just l

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    79. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      There was a time when jobs offered benefits, job security, and respect for their employees.

      As others have pointed out, this was more of an anamoly than anything else. It really comes down to supply and demand, and also global markets.

      There was once a time when people bought stuff from the store down the street - because they didn't know that the one 40 miles away had the same item on sale for ten cents less. Today you run a search on froogle for anything of any value at all, and you pick the vendor that offers the best quality for the lowest price. And that selection can be ruthless - if you find an item listed by two vendors that you consider completely trustworthy and the item is literally 5 cents cheaper at one of them, you'll probably buy it there.

      As a result EVERYBODY is at an intense level of competition. That translates all the way to the workforce. if paying your employees more can lead to better sales then it may happen - but those employees might be expected to work long hours or otherwise earn their keep.

      There will always be market segments that can compete on something other than just price or hours-worked - but they still have to compete on something. If you're extremely innovative or creative or intelligent you might be able to get by without constant pager abuse or whatever. But if you're fairly typical then you'll be treated in a fairly typical way - and if you don't play ball somebody else will get picked for the team.

      Sure, it doesn't sound nice on one level, although it does lead to a far more efficient society. Whether or not the perfect society ought to be perfectly efficient is open to debate. However, this isn't a matter of greedy employers - it is a matter of greedy EVERYBODY. If you buy stock in companies with the highest returns, or always buy the better product for the cheapest price, or expect a competitive wage then you're just part of the big everybody-looks-out-for-number-one system.

      Asking an employer to work an employee for 40 hours per week when 90% of his competition is willing to work for 50 hours is like asking a consumer to buy a 12" TV for $500 when the store down the street sells the same model for $60. If you don't tolerate paying more than your have to how can you expect your boss to do otherwise?

      And for the record I'm fine with moderate workplace regulations to keep things safe and to reasonably regulate things like this. As long as the regs are fair and don't cause the entire economy to tank - the US (or wherever you live) is in competition as well. I don't consider a perfectly efficient society an ideal one, but we have to be realistic about drawing the lines otherwise in 50 years we'll find ourself invaded by somebody who can build tanks for half the price that we can...

    80. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by The+Dream+becomes+Re · · Score: 1

      All BlackBerry devices are equipped with a "Power ON/OFF Switch". The SWTICH is "Standard Equipment" on all BlackBerry devices and functions in an identical manner on the plant earth. Usage is rather simple...depress the button once [hold down for approx 2 seconds] and the BlackBerry will "disconnect itself" from the RIM Relay, Corporate BES or the Consumer BIS, thus providing the "personal privacy" and "isolation from the mobile digital world" Pretty Amazing Feature!!! P.S. The BlackBerry is a reliable "personal alarm clock" and is a "fantastic flashlight". In fact, BlackBerry has instilled such "efficiency into my daily rigor" that I now work two hours less per day [on average] and have contructed a "new life work balance methodology" that "gives back" additional "family time" which we all should treasure. Time spent focusing on work and delivering client business wins anywhere, anytime...priceless. Extra time spent enjoying family and friends anywhere, anytime, everyday...truly priceless. The BlackBerry...Simply Secure...Simply Business...Simply Priceless!!! It's that simple!!

    81. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by nullhero · · Score: 1

      In other words, lots of those who "get connected" like this do so willingly, and with a certain sense of self-importance.


      I have to agree, everyone at my job complains about being available, I work in a call center, and I just do it. So I get compensated for things that they don't, but it's my decision. I don't have to bring work home, but I do work on things that would improve my job, and so I present them, and get implement them. Am I working too hard? Not really because I'm also in school, and if I have a paper then I work just on that, and nothing for my job.

      --
      Save Pangaea!! Stop Continental Drift!!
    82. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by alta · · Score: 1

      To me it means multiple of everything to reduce single point of failure... What does it mean to you?

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    83. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by arivanov · · Score: 1

      In Cambridge (the other red brick city) they tell you not to bother them unless the kid has stopped breathing and come within working hours. Speaking based on experience. NHS, don't you just love 'em.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    84. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "'m very sad for you if you really only work for the paycheck. If you don't understand that sadness now, then I doubt you ever will, especially given your example of an abusive relationship. How bad is your job?"

      What abusive relationship? Dunno where you got THAT from.

      I guess what I'm saying, is that there are TONS of things out there that I like to do....date women, travel, party....a job is the means to that end...nothing more.

      That's not to say, I don't enjoy my work....I've done many types of jobs over the years, currently it is IT, it pays well, and as a contractor, I get to make a GREAT bill rate, I don't get stuck in one dead end job, I constantly get to learn....but, I can say, if I won the lottery tomorrow, I'd walk out with narry a thought. Hell, i'd probably not even bother to come back to pick up anything from my desk.

      I really don't understand what you think is so sad about that? I make money, I use it to have a blast. I enjoy my life....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    85. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I have to agree with you on this.

      While I'm not about to say that you're not going to get stuck working on something you don't like; however it should be a positive experience on the whole.

      Why? You spend 40 hours a week at a job, probably another 10 hours to get ready and to/from and take lunch in the middle.

      50 hours a week, out of 16 waking hours a day, 7 days a week for a total of 112. That's nearly half!

      Now, I can't put a dollar value on happiness and fulfillment, that's up to the individual.

      And, of course, he might be in that lower bracket where he's still concerned about fulfilling the basics - in which case he's doing what he has to do in order to get by."

      I'm certainly NOT in the lower bracket of anything....my tax bill proves that.

      As I responded to the other person, why do you think it is sad? Now...I do happen to enjoy what I do, it isn't a drag or anything. But I do it ONLY because I get paid. I have no loyalty to a company or whatever....I contract, I work soley for me. I LOVE having the life I have. I like to party, run around with different women, travel, etc....I love fine dining, cooking at home...nightlife, different hobbies (many that are not cheap).

      My job is ONLY a means to those ends. I'd quite tomorrow if I won the lottery though....I've got plenty I like to do outside of work. it is not my life, it does not in any way define 'me'.

      And, the nice thing about contracting....I don't ever get stuck with what I don't like, or get bored. If I don't like something, the next job is only a few phone calls away.

      Now, can you explain why your job means SO much to you? Would you still be doing it if you didn't have to , to earn a living? If so, why? Aren't there things in your life (friends, family, fun...toys) that you'd rather be doing during those work hours?

      I like money, and all the things that go with it...what it allows me to do that fullfills my life. So far, the only way I can figure how to get that (legally) is through work...so, work is merely a means to an end....my pleasure.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    86. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Yep standard of living goes up a tiny bit for far flung countries. Meanwhile people in your own countries see their standard of living plumet.

      Goes up a tiny bit for billions. Stays pretty much stagnant for the USA

      Or would you rather go back 30 years? I look around, plenty of people are buying 50" HTDVs, go back 20 and we'd be looking at 32" as 'big', or really expensive projection sets that needed lots of maintenance.

      Go back even 10 years and cars on average had less power, fewer features, and were more polluting.

      Current expense increases tend to be more about the increasing cost of oil, than outsourcing of wages.
      Mandate a high wage and everyone competes on merit. It means you have to raise people's standard of living enough in the 3rd world country for them to be able to afford an education and compete against people in your own country. That is not a bad thing. That makes for real competition, instead of outsourcing jobs to people who can't actually do them because they work 16 hours a day and can't afford much more than food.

      Uh, they are. Not immediately of course, it'll take generations. Mandate what you'd consider a high wage and the jobs never move.

      If you take someone that's paid $1 a week and pay them $4 a week, they're still not going to be able to live a good life.

      First, let's move away from looking at 'pay' and switch to income. Before being hired by the factory, they were essentially self-employed on their farms.

      Matter of fact, even if you work for a single employer getting a regular paycheck, you could still consider yourself self-employed, as you can always leave to do something else(income variations aside).

      Anyways, I'm arguing for incremental improvement - you seem to be arguing for 'all or nothing' affairs. Fact is, in the report I read - the workers were riding bicycles in two years, and many had mopeds in 10. As a result, other businesses opened to sell and support the bicycles, and then the mopeds. Primary school completion was an order of magnitude higher for the kids of the employees over the farmers.

      I fail to see how all this isn't a good thing. Look at our history - even with the exploitation we eventually improved.

      There are actual slave-labor shops out there that do as you say - but they're a different matter.

      Yeah some choice. You just lost your right to work your land. You and your whole family may work for pitance or starve. When faced with this choice there is effectively no other choice but suicide. As for trading and selling them, I've got that covered too. The sweat shop is bought, or taken over. What choice did these people have again? Thats right work for new owner or starve. It is slavery. Period.

      Who took their land? I said they left the farm to go work at the factory. The only land lost would be the space the factory takes up - which should have been bought by the farmers.

      If your argument held true, people wouldn't work in sweat shops all their lives. They'd work between 5 and 10 years and get a higher wage. That's not the typical story and you know that very well.

      Actually, it tends to take generations. The grandfather's a peasant, the father is a shoe assembler, the son is a plumber, and the grandson an accountant.

      Great job setting up strawmen, though.

      Do you really think that outsourcing a $100,000 job to Bangalore for $50,000 is going to suddenly create lots of jobs!?

      Any one job's effects are marginal. But we outsourced so many jobs that if we'd theoretically kept them all 'home', we'd have negative unemployment.

      What that means is that at least most of our people managed to find work doing something other than the jobs outsourced. Job maintenance in the USA, growth over there.

      Another part of this is secondary effects - we employ thousands of people in the country - now that they're making more than they would have otherwise, they demand more goods/services as well. Th

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    87. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by syousef · · Score: 1

      Goes up a tiny bit for billions. Stays pretty much stagnant for the USA

      Or would you rather go back 30 years? I look around, plenty of people are buying 50" HTDVs, go back 20 and we'd be looking at 32" as 'big', or really expensive projection sets that needed lots of maintenance.


      WOW! You really have NO IDEA how to measure the standard of living. Yeah the technology has gotten better right across the board. I think you'll find that the average wage peaked in the US (and other developed countries) and while there is still a small group of people who'll be able to afford luxury goods, the number of people living below the poverty line is actually increasing - you know the number of people who can actually afford those basic needs you keep saying are important. The average person's ability to get medical care for serious illness and injury is decreasing

      Go back even 10 years and cars on average had less power, fewer features, and were more polluting

      Yeah the technology is getting better. What's that got to do with outsourcing jobs to people who aren't qualified, or running sweat shops?

      Anyways, I'm arguing for incremental improvement - you seem to be arguing for 'all or nothing' affairs. Fact is, in the report I read - the workers were riding bicycles in two years, and many had mopeds in 10. As a result, other businesses opened to sell and support the bicycles, and then the mopeds. Primary school completion was an order of magnitude higher for the kids of the employees over the farmers.

      I'm not arguing for all or nothing affairs. I'm arguing for not trading well paid jobs for badly paid ones.

      Okay so you're saying that kids who ride bikes and mopeds are better off because they get a primary school education (probably something the company encourages so they can have employees children in the same sweatshops their parents work in). However that same child is robbed of a parent that can afford to spend any time with them. The future has gone from one of starving, to one of likely becoming a virtual slave like their parents. I don't think that's fair or reasonable. What would be fair and reasonable is that the parents are paid well to enough to meet the basic needs of their family doing a reasonable number of hours (say 50) a week so they can also raise a family. Which brings us back to the protectionalism you so loath, and reasonable well regulated working conditions.

      A COMPANY THAT CAN'T PROVIDE A LIVING WAGE FOR AN EMPLOYEE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO HIRE THAT EMPLOYEE.

      What's more to be reasonably fair there has to be some kind of reward for working hard beyond simply subsisting. There has to be some reasonable prospect for someone in a 3rd world country of improving their situation. Again minimum subsistence wages that lead to a life of forced labour (on threat of starvation) just isn't enough. To trade even a small jobs that don't do this for a number of jobs that do is AWFUL for all of humanity because eventually that will become the norm (ie work, or die, there's someone else willing to take your place). What a horrible world that would be. Think of it this way, in such a world you wouldn't have access to the computer you're using or the time to argue with me.

      I fail to see how all this isn't a good thing. Look at our history - even with the exploitation we eventually improved.

      Yeah look at our history. It took violence and militant unionism to do it! People suffered and even died under such systems. whole generations grew up with a poor education. People who got sick or ill fell on the scrap heap of society. The absolute irony of your statement is disturbing.

      There are actual slave-labor shops out there that do as you say - but they're a different matter.

      You're very naive. In a country where there is no protection where company owners tell themselves they're doing their workforce a favour preventing them from starving by giving them sweatshop jobs, slave-labour will be the norm.

      Who

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    88. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Boy, you're just losing your temper, aren't you?

      WOW! You really have NO IDEA how to measure the standard of living.

      Sure I do. Unlike you, I'm cognizant that increases in technology result in realworld increases in the standard of living.

      Thus my point that people, on average, are better off today than they were a decade ago, and so on and so forth.

      Yeah the technology has gotten better right across the board. I think you'll find that the average wage peaked in the US

      I suggest that you look up the definition of 'stagnant'.

      the number of people living below the poverty line is actually increasing - you know the number of people who can actually afford those basic needs you keep saying are important.

      Give me a break - do you even know how the US defines poverty?

      The average person's ability to get medical care for serious illness and injury is decreasing

      Not really, people can get treatment for illnesses that were untreatable in past years. What's happening though is that these treatments are expensive, and it's gotten to the point that it's a major expense because we can treat so much, but don't often have 'magic cures'. A cancer that used to kill in three months now can be cured half the time- but takes a year of expensive treatment to do so.

      Okay so you're saying that kids who ride bikes and mopeds are better off because they get a primary school education.

      Heh - nope, I said the EMPLOYEES had started riding to work - first with bicycles, then later on to mopeds.

      Their children probably still walked to school - but they were going to school, and completing at least primary(elementary). The study didn't cover secondary education, past the terms of the study at the time I read about it.

      probably something the company encourages so they can have employees children in the same sweatshops their parents work in

      Just a vast source of optimisim aren't you? The factory employed adults - not children, actually reducing the child labor rates over the previous farms that pulled children out of school early to work on the farms.

      Which brings us back to the protectionalism you so loath, and reasonable well regulated working conditions.

      And your complete misunderstanding, as the parents were working within the hours you mentioned.

      A COMPANY THAT CAN'T PROVIDE A LIVING WAGE FOR AN EMPLOYEE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO HIRE THAT EMPLOYEE.

      They were though, especially by the standards of the area. Again, it seems you'd prefer them to remain virtually grubbing in the mud rather than be employed for lower wages than the USA.

      As for the USA, if an employee isn't WORTH what you consider a 'living wage', they're going to be unemployed. Personally, I'd rather them work at least some. Eventually they might get there. Meanwhile, at least, we don't have them sucking on the government teat.

      What's more to be reasonably fair there has to be some kind of reward for working hard beyond simply subsisting.

      Like the workers at the factory actually being able to afford something as simple as a bicycle? Housing with plumbing, electricity?

      There has to be some reasonable prospect for someone in a 3rd world country of improving their situation. Again minimum subsistence wages that lead to a life of forced labour (on threat of starvation) just isn't enough.

      Ah, life before the factory opened. Again - this is the life they had BEFORE the facotry opened. They depending upon their farm producing in order to eat, and a bad year can lead to famine. Medical care is limited, injury rehab virtually non-existant.

      To trade even a small jobs that don't do this for a number of jobs that do is AWFUL for all of humanity because eventually that will become the norm (ie work, or die, there's someone else willing to take your place). What a horrible world that would be. Think of it this way, in such a world you wouldn't have

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    89. Re:this is incumbent upon the employee by syousef · · Score: 1

      Boy, you're just losing your temper, aren't you?

      You're surprised by this after the personal attacks?

      Sure I do. Unlike you, I'm cognizant that increases in technology result in realworld increases in the standard of living.

      Yeah I wonder why I might lose my temper huh? Where did I indicate that I didn't understand technology improves standard of living? You're the one who's trying to shift credit for increase in standard of living from technology to the provision of slave labour jobs.

      I suggest that you look up the definition of 'stagnant'.

      I suggest that you look up the definition of arrogant poser.

      Give me a break - do you even know how the US defines poverty?

      I'm willing to bet I know more about it than you do. A complete shift to personal attacks instead of refuting anything I said. I love it. You've run out of ideas so you resort to vilifying your opponent. Child!

      Not really, people can get treatment for illnesses that were untreatable in past years. What's happening though is that these treatments are expensive, and it's gotten to the point that it's a major expense because we can treat so much, but don't often have 'magic cures'. A cancer that used to kill in three months now can be cured half the time- but takes a year of expensive treatment to do so. ...and if a cancer sufferer is too poor to afford the treatment, who cares if it's now technologically and medically possible. They're still just as dead without the treatment.

      Heh - nope, I said the EMPLOYEES had started riding to work - first with bicycles, then later on to mopeds.

      Oh wonderful. Now our slave workers can turn up to work an hour earlier.

      Their children probably still walked to school - but they were going to school, and completing at least primary(elementary). The study didn't cover secondary education, past the terms of the study at the time I read about it. ...and did the study take into account other reasons why children may be finishing school, or the effects of having their parents removed for greater periods of time? Did the study cover improvement in standard of living or these generational changes you speak of?

      Please point me to this study you speak of. People here are great at hand waving and making statements they can't back up. When you ask for proof 90% of the time they'll say they can't be bothered.

      Just a vast source of optimisim aren't you? The factory employed adults - not children, actually reducing the child labor rates over the previous farms that pulled children out of school early to work on the farms.

      Oh yeah I believe that. Because historically if you don't have any kind of legislation to prevent it children are never forced into jobs right? Optimism my arse. Has it occurred to you that learning a skill or trade in a family environment may be more beneficial than taking the kid's parents away 16 hours a day? Ever heard of a family business? Or is business only okay if it's big business?

      And your complete misunderstanding, as the parents were working within the hours you mentioned.

      You're telling me in a 3rd world environment where there was no "protectionalist" law to prevent abuse, parents were being made to work reasonable hours. Again show me the proof because quite frankly I think you're pulling this out of your backside. Even if you're not from what I've read it's the exception not the rule.

      They were though, especially by the standards of the area. Again, it seems you'd prefer them to remain virtually grubbing in the mud rather than be employed for lower wages than the USA.


      Proof please. Put up or shut up. What's the bet if you bother to provide it the wages will be at best meagre.

      Again I'll repeat if you keep lowering the bar for what's acceptable to pay people, eventually every human being on earth that has paid work is working long hours for meagre pay. There are a lot more p

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  2. Yes, it's a problem by s.d. · · Score: 4, Informative

    Aside from the fact that my manager sometimes asks me to take my BlackBerry with me when I go on vacation (which I refuse to do), it's really easy to just look at it in the evenings or on weekends to see if there's any mail and check on things. I have taken to setting the automatic power down/power on setting, so I am not tempted to sneak a peak when I walk past it when I'm at home. I never check work mail on the computer in my free time, but the BlackBerry makes it so easy, it doesn't feel like I'm working until I've sunk 2 hours into something that could have waited until the morning.

    1. Re:Yes, it's a problem by eln · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why I don't have a phone with email capability. If I ever do get one, I won't configure it for my work email. My cell phone number is readily available to anyone with an emergency situation at the office. If they need it, they can use it (but someone had better be dying if they do, or someone will be dying shortly after). I do occasionally check my work email from home, but I never, ever answer it from home (and believe me, sometimes that takes some effort to avoid). Anything sent by email is assumed to not be of earth-shattering importance. If it was so important that it couldn't wait until morning, they would have called.

      Of course, when I'm not on call, I may not answer my phone immediately anyway. In those cases, if it's really important, they'll either leave a voice mail or call someone else on the team.

    2. Re:Yes, it's a problem by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Policy for IT admins here is to /always/ let things go to voicemail then call back. This prevents people trying to argue you into fixing a trivial problem and it's amazing how often stuff isn't important enough for people to leave voicemails. This also has the advantage that you can make sure that you are actually in a position to help people (on computer, logged into VPN) when you call back or you can call someone else to help them if you are indisposed.

      That is for admin support. Our front-line helpdesk has a system where a voicemail is recorded then the system will call them until they pick up and retrieve it.

      Rich

    3. Re:Yes, it's a problem by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      See, I don't understand this. The argument around being pressured by mgt, I can't really say anything about because I haven't experienced it. But why are you not able to simply NOT LOOK AT YOUR PDA if you don't want to? I honestly don't get it. I have had a PDA for over a year and I can -- without a doubt -- say that is has significantly increased my work life balance. I can take the earlier flight home without guilt.

  3. Just turn it off by Hanners1979 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Staff expressed fears about BlackBerries contributing to a longer working day

    Just going out on a limb here, but couldn't they switch it off when they don't want to be working?

    1. Re:Just turn it off by DeeQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with just turning them off is the company will frown upon that. They didn't purchase these for their employees to not use them. No matter how you look at it weather it be only 5 extra min or 2 hours of extra work being accessible via Email at any time. People want to go home after a long days work and not have to deal with all the problems of them. I can see why they would be fearing having them, but turning them off could arise problems with staff.

    2. Re:Just turn it off by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      The problem with just turning them off is the company will frown upon that. They didn't purchase these for their employees to not use them.
      That's why you leave it on during business hours and turn it off when you leave for the day.
      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:Just turn it off by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      I use the blackberry at work just so I can be mobile at work (not at my desk) but the damn thing is off when I go home or just left on my desk unless I'm on call. That way if someone really wants me, they call my Cell or page me with an SMS message. I get paid if I'm paged, but not if I answer an email. 8)

  4. Yes. by TheRealFixer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At least, I know it does for me. There are plenty of times now I wish we had never gotten these stupid Blackberries. Once your management knows that they can get a hold of you via email any time, any place, they suddenly expect that to be the norm. With plain old cell phones, it requires a personal interaction that feels much more intrusive. When you shoot off an email, it doesn't feel the same. You don't feel bad about it, like you do when you call someone and interrupt their dinner. Which makes people much more likely to do it.

    1. Re:Yes. by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      See I would have thought it'd go the other way. I feel like I can safely ignore email since if it were urgent I would receive a phone call. I suppose being the curious gentleman that I am I would be tempted to check my email more frequently with the blackberry. Wouldn't the problem be in how the employee handles the email? If you can ignore the temptation to read your email on your time or simply don't act on it until you're on the clock what's the harm? If an employer expects you to always be on call and to respond quickly to emails even when you aren't working you need to renegotiate your wages/hours.

      As a side note I do have a cellphone that I use to read my emails (HTC Hermes) but I read them during boring meetings usually :-p

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    2. Re:Yes. by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      You check your blackberry during dinner at home?

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    3. Re:Yes. by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of the "switch it off" option? I think even those blackberries have such a feature. Just like my mobile (it's off now). And my e-mail (closed at the moment). And on top of that: e-mail can wait. It can wait much better than a phone call.
      Every evening I receive e-mails, and actually I do answer a lot of them. It's part of my work. I don't complain, I'm the boss. BUt I'd much rather have my customers send me e-mail that I can reply when I have time (end of the evening, before going off to bed, check and answer the urgent ones) than getting ten phone calls spread over the evening.
      It's a matter of self-discipline. Switch it off.

    4. Re:Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, the other way to look at it is that when it is a simple question that can wait until tomorrow, if you have to call someone, you will sit there and go "this can wait until I SEE him/her tomorrow/when they get back from lunch" whereas with email, you just fire it off and the poor bastard that had his blackberry go off has to look and see the "when you get a chance email...". Admit it, you will even answer the email and further perpetuate the problem...

    5. Re:Yes. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Once your management knows that they can get a hold of you via email any time, any place, they suddenly expect that to be the norm. With plain old cell phones, it requires a personal interaction that feels much more intrusive. When you shoot off an email, it doesn't feel the same. You don't feel bad about it, like you do when you call someone and interrupt their dinner. Which makes people much more likely to do it. Pretty much by definition, email is not time-sensitive communication. If someone is sending you an email about an emergency, that person is in serious need of some education on the subject.
    6. Re:Yes. by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      How many times have they sent an email to you and then yelled at you for not reading it during your off hours? It seems to me that if I ever got this from mgt, I would simply ask them why they didn't call my phone if it was that urgent.

      I hear the theoretical point you're making often, but I don't ever see it. My consulting firm decided to shell out for PDAs for everyone about a year ago, and I have seen no noticeable change like that which is being suggested.

  5. I've heard people say... by Loibisch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've heard people say "thank god I'm not eligible [meaning high enough in the food chain] to get one of those" over where I work. So I'd say people definitely fear the intrusion of work into privacy and I understand totally. There's got to be a time where you have to be able to say "I'm sorry, but I was out and couldn't check company mail".

    1. Re:I've heard people say... by sricetx · · Score: 1

      It's an easy solution - During business hours, Monday through Friday 9am to 5pm, allow your employer to contact you via your mobile device. Outside of business hours, turn the thing off or don't respond to messages from your employer. They are not paying you to work 100% of the time, so they can pound sand. There is absolutely nothing so important that it can't wait until the next business day. If your employer is expecting you to be on call 24/7 then you have an abusive employer and I would recommend finding a job elsewhere. Note that if you are in IT or support, the situation may be different, but you signed up for that lifestyle.

    2. Re:I've heard people say... by mccalli · · Score: 1

      There's got to be a time where you have to be able to say "I'm sorry, but I was out and couldn't check company mail".

      Indeed, there's got to be a time where you are able to "I was out and unavailable for company mail". Forget sorry and couldn't - my time is mine.

      I actually do some work voluntarily from home, but it's time I've arranged and not just random "hope you're available" time. And it remains my ambition in life to never own a blackberry.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:I've heard people say... by MBCook · · Score: 1
      Let me translate. That probably means one of three things.
      1. I'm afraid of responsibility
      2. I don't think I'd have enough strength to be able to control myself with that and not let work take over my personal life, or stand up for myself when work starts asking me to be on call all the time
      3. I wouldn't want my position to involve being expected to be on call all the time
      I see no problem with #3, but I think for most people that statement probably means #2.
      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:I've heard people say... by Loibisch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All is good in theory. Yes, you might have an abusive employer...but without having a blackberry and the need to decide what to do about it in your free time forced on you there wouldn't be a problem in the first place.

      In other words: you might have an abusive employer but it might not ever show.

    5. Re:I've heard people say... by nine-times · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What I find funny about the Blackberry thing is that, in a couple places that I've worked, they were being used pretty much exclusively for middle-management. The lowly helpdesk techs supposedly weren't important enough to get one, in spite of the fact that it would be really useful for them to receive e-mail when they were away from their desks "in the field". Then a bunch of managers who were at their desks all day anyway had them. But then, oddly, the executive team didn't have Blackberries.

      I once asked one of the VPs about it, and he basically said, "We let the managers get them because it makes them feel important and they aren't that expensive. But I sure as hell don't want to be on-call 24 hours a day." I felt like I learned something right there. The trappings of power are usually most appreciated by those who don't really have any. Those guys who spend a lot of time trying to show you who's boss are specifically those who aren't "the boss". The people who are really in charge don't necessarily feel the need to prove it to you.

    6. Re:I've heard people say... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Sounds very much like what we said 10, 15 years or so ago when the GSM phones started to really boom. There are three groups of people:
      1. There were people who were not imporant enough to be reachable all the time, so they didn't have a mobile phone.
      2. Then there were the more important people, who thought it was a good idea to be reachable all the time, they had one.
      3. And those really important ones didn't have a mobile phone, because they were important enough to decide by themselves when they are reachable and when not.
      Now of course we know where it all led: everyone and their dog have a mobile phone. For example in Hong Kong where I live, there are about 7,5-8 million mobile phone accounts in use, on a population of 7 million people. And a couple hundred thousand dogs, at most.

    7. Re:I've heard people say... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Even if you're in IT or support, then setting yourself up in such a way that there is a need for any specific person to be available 24/7 is asking for trouble.

      What if that person's in an accident?

      Taken sick? Or a relative is taken sick? Until recently, UK hospitals banned mobile phones for fear of interfering with life support equipment.

      Is that person never allowed to visit the cinema outside of work hours? (you've got to turn your phone off in a cinema, some are even installing jamming equipment).

      Are they allowed to do anything which involves going up in the air? I don't know about other countries, but in the UK the Civil Aviation Authority bans mobile phones even in things with no significant electronic equipment like hot air balloons.

    8. Re:I've heard people say... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Well yes, I'd be surprised if we didn't all have ubiquitous wireless broadband internet access (including e-mail) within the next twenty years. I get e-mail on my phone now, but I don't really use it for the purpose of making myself available to work for non-work hours.

    9. Re:I've heard people say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you just described the US power structure.

    10. Re:I've heard people say... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I once asked one of the VPs about it, and he basically said, "We let the managers get them because it makes them feel important and they aren't that expensive. But I sure as hell don't want to be on-call 24 hours a day."

      Yeah, if you're a VP, you get to decide who can reach you. Really, it has to be this way or nobody would get anything done.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    11. Re:I've heard people say... by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

      [sarcasm: socioeconomic darwinist]

      It is no accident that these are the same exact people that complain that they are not paid enough to afford housing outside the "affordable" (read: high crime) zones and are not paid enough to afford cars that won't attract cops due to poor condition and/or overdue inspection. If a person wants enough money to not have to live like a slob, on must be prepared to run oneself into the ground. The PDA is merely the tool to assist in the burial.

      [/sarcasm]

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  6. It depends on when it is used. by JerryLove · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would think this rather obvious: using a black-berry to receive emails when you are out in the field during your business day is enabling remoteness, while using it to return emails at dinner is removing the work/home distinction. I don't generally see a black-berry as offering a distinct advantage over a cellphone with text messaging in the case of those "get everyone on the phone, the server is down" emergencies... and if you are doing routine emails during your off-hours then they are not off-hours.

    1. Re:It depends on when it is used. by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      Most of the people in my company that have BB are in the upper echelons. They get paid *very* well to be online 24*7*365.

      In my department, I am the 24*7 point of contact for problems. It's my department and I like to know what is going on. The people that work for me are on a standby schedule. They all pull 20 hours of standby each week. When something happens, I get called. I get the problem info and then I call whoever is on standby. The standby tech comes in and works the issue. He then gets 1.5 hours off for every hour he worked the problem. Seems to work okay.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
  7. Two-sided by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the one hand, I enjoy the flexibility of having my laptop come home with me, so that if something happens and I can't get to my office, I can still work. On the other hand, I get obsessive with problems I can't solve, so there's the pitfall of going home, logging in, and continuing to work. It's up to the individual to control their use. Now, if your supervisor begins pressuring you to work more... that's a whole different ballgame, but still, you have to push back when work bleeds into your home life to the point that it interferes too much.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  8. Yes, but I waste more time on the clock by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The consequence is that I also don't work that hard when I'm actually at work.

    It's easier for me to justify randomly screwing around on the internet or working on personal coding/whatever at work because I wind up checking email and working over weekends to get things done. I think it's fair. They steal some of my free time, I waste some of their paid time.

    1. Re:Yes, but I waste more time on the clock by ookabooka · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hardly sounds like a long term solution though, eventually you'll just go to work and not do anything, only to come home and then start working. . .? In your case I think it's more important to keep work and pleasure separate rather than trying to keep them balanced. Otherwise you end up spending all your time "working" but accomplishing little.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    2. Re:Yes, but I waste more time on the clock by weicco · · Score: 1

      If someone calls me outside office hours it's fine by me. If I'm not doing anything like sitting in the toilet or having quality time with my wife I'll answer and charge one hour salary for that 5 minute phone call.

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    3. Re:Yes, but I waste more time on the clock by MBCook · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A man gets a Bill from his lawyer.

      Jim,

      I was walking down the street the other day and I thought I saw you. I called
      out your name and crossed the street to say "Hi", but it wasn't you after all.

      15 minutes of my time - $200

      That is an excellent solution to the problem, but I doubt many people would have the guts to go through with it.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:Yes, but I waste more time on the clock by MBCook · · Score: 1

      So what? If I do my work, why should they care? If my job allows me*, I should be able to do this kind of thing. I'd jump on a problem if it came up. That's expected.

      * What I mean by "allows me" is that the job is setup in a way that this isn't a problem. As an accountant who has a big assignment that will take me a week, or a programmer who already has the scope and just need to do the coding, this should be fine. If you a help desk representative, a lawyer or accountant who needs to meet clients, or some other people facing job this way of working obviously wouldn't work out.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    5. Re:Yes, but I waste more time on the clock by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Careful. Time spent slacking off at work is more visible and obvious to your boss and coworkers than time spent working after hours. You may actually be putting in your fair share (or more) of time, yet it won't appear that way to a casual observer. Depending on your boss, that might reflect rather negatively on you.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Yes, but I waste more time on the clock by gander666 · · Score: 1

      In my life, (I am a product manager) my days are filled with tactical fire fighting, and little ability to do any long term items that need to happen for my product lines. I often do 2 hours of email and "strategic" items in the morning before I head to the office (to my wife's chagrin, I am a morning person), and two hours of email catchup at night before bed. Yep, it interferes with the home life, but I am compensated really well for it (my company knows how important that is), and I do it with both eyes open.

      Of course, I can turn it off, and when I disconnect (like I will do the next two weeks), people understand that I am decompressing. It is a balance, not perfect, but works for me. I still hate my Treo with GoodLink though. Mostly, it reminds me how far behind I am getting.

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    7. Re:Yes, but I waste more time on the clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He means it's not a long term solution for you. If you don't accomplish anything at work and do the job in your free time, you don't have any actual free time left: You can't do what you want at work and you can't do what you want at home.

    8. Re:Yes, but I waste more time on the clock by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      I think some people have trouble staying focussed for a long period of time. For them, taking lots of breaks at work actually increases their productivity, as long as they follow it up with a little extra work at home/on weekends.

      I know I, for one, have trouble on vacations because after the third day I start to feel a strong compulsion to do *something* productive - doesn't have to be work, can be a hobby, etc. In the past when my various jobs didn't keep me busy enough, I always spawned many side projects - I guess I'm just not comfortable just sitting around playing games or "going out" too much.

    9. Re:Yes, but I waste more time on the clock by sjames · · Score: 1

      If I'm not doing anything like sitting in the toilet...

      If you want to discourage intruding on your personal life, on the toilet is the IDEAL time to answer after hours work calls. Be sure to grunt and fart as much as possible and explain what you're doing so they don't think you're crazy.

      If that doesn't clue them in that everyone will be better off if boundaries between work and other are honored, nothing will.

  9. Its only a problem by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

    if you let it be one. A job doesn't necessarily mean 24/7 accessibility.

    1. Re:Its only a problem by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      Some people don't have a choice. It really depends on management's view on things. Some of them don't even consider time you take to respond on your own time at home as work and will consider it as norm, ask for it as a rule. Gone are the good old days where people can just say, "sorry everyone left for the day, we'll get on it tomorrow mornining" and are replaced with "I'll get him on the phone right away, we'll have this done tonight".

      The whole telecommuting thing is BS. If you spent 2 hours at home one night solving someone's problem they'll expect you to be in on time and will complain if your late 30 minutes the next morning. People expect to own your life. Welcome to work in the 21st century.

    2. Re:Its only a problem by crunzh · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with this. Its nice to be able to check email from home, esp as I am a student and only work part time but it doesn't mean you absolutely have to do it.

      --
      Visit http://www.crunzh.com/ for free software. Mac/Lin/Win
  10. saves the travel by jeffreyMartin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd rather have the crackberry (or mobile phone, or notebook) available if I *need* to do something, than have to run to the office on a saturday because of one forgotten task or reply. And yes, you can turn it off!

    1. Re:saves the travel by mamono · · Score: 1

      I agree, yes I'm always accessible if needed but it also truly does give me schedule flexibility. I can leave early, come late, if someone needs me they send an e-mail. I'll get it on my BlackBerry, log in via VPN and take care of it. If it's urgent and I'm not at the office I can call someone who is and walk them through it.

  11. Im constantly monitoring not necessarily available by penfold69 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a blackberry 8800, which revolutionised how I work.

    I have several email addresses routed to it, which each have different notification tones. If I receive a Nagios alert to my "Oh Crap" email address, the notification is loud and insistent. If I receive personal mail, it's subtle. Business mail is also fairly quiet and subtle but different to personal mail.

    Outside of "working hours", I can choose to ignore it easily enough. Only if our monitoring system picks up something alert-worthy do I have to actually bother actioning something immediately.

    When I was first offered the blackberry, I made it clear to the MD that this would not intrude upon my personal life unnecessarily. If I *choose* to read my business emails outside of working hours, then all fine. I balance that with *choosing* to read my personal mail during work hours :)

    P.

    --
    Beer Coat: The invisible but warm coat worn when walking home after a booze cruise at 3 in the morning.
  12. Meh by djasbestos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have one, and I almost never get called ever since I stopped pushing software updates on Friday.

    Then again, you make me do work stuff at home, I'm gonna do more home stuff at work. Yay internet.

    1. Re:Meh by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      since I stopped pushing software updates on Friday.

      That's been our policy for years. No new releases/updates/pushes on Fridays. Period.

    2. Re:Meh by 2bitcomputers · · Score: 1

      Yeah that is kind of a basic sanity thing. We have taken it a step further and stopped doing deployments in the afternoon as well. Schedule it for first thing tomorrow morning so you have all day to work out the kinks.

      --
      -- Please insert another quarter
    3. Re:Meh by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      And only critical fixes during december, but then I work for a retail site.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  13. But only for the senior executives. by jimcooncat · · Score: 1

    "...some senior executives claiming a BlackBerry can contribute to work/life balance by facilitating telecommuting and more flexible schedules."

    1. Re:But only for the senior executives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give the senior executives those magic berries already! Can't you hear them claiming? They'll keep them busy, which will contribute to everybody else's work/life balance and flexible schedules.

  14. Ditto what he said. by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Seriously - Those of us who are SysAdmins have dealt with this for ages...

    You negotiate beforehand what happens when the pager goes off - either you get 'overtime', comp-time off, or your salary begins large enough to compensate you for the projected time spent on pager-duty. Not much different w/ a Crackberry...

    If you get one issued to you, demand compensation for the added work that's sure to come with it - either through more flexible scheduling, more money, more comp/vacation time, or something substantial.

    I have a decent setup where I'm at now - if I get a call, then the time spent gets deducted the next day or day after, or they pay me overtime based on 1.5x my salary broken down to an hourly rate (based on a typical 40hr week). Pretty simple after that.

    Now, if you're adamant about delineated time-off vs. time-on, then simply state as much before you start.

    But, like the parent said... most employers are perfectly okay with this, and it's only a minimum of haggle. Any employer who isn't needs to be dropped for one who is.

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Ditto what he said. by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For a sysadmin continuous access can actually enhance the balance. I don't have to drive in for every little problem because I have integrated lights out on all my servers so only a true hardware failure requires a trip into the office on off hours. Having a smartphone makes it even better because now instead of having to have a laptop with me or doing it from my home workstation I can now do many non-complicated tasks from anywhere (such as at the bar).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Ditto what he said. by racermd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The issue of whether constant connectivity is a benefit or not greatly depends on the individual.

      For example, as an IT worker myself, I think having that 24x7 accessibility to my work can be a benefit, but it's also the greatest source of my frustration. As a result, I've stopped carrying such devices for business use.

      I've been much happier carrying only a cell phone - that I pay for - that I can turn off when I'm out of the office. I've made it a point to separate work and home. Since I started doing that a few years ago, I'm much less stressed and can focus more. Work stuff stays at work and my personal life can stay out of the office.

      When it's mandated that I be available 24x7 for a period of time (such as an on-call rotation or a major project), I still weigh my choices and, if it's too demanding, I'll decline. Yes, even if it's career-limiting decision. Usually, it's not a problem and, in fact, some managers have gained respect for such a decision (even if they didn't think so at the time they asked).

      Obviously, others will have differing points of view. However, it's important to keep a balance. That balance will differ from person to person.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    3. Re:Ditto what he said. by Penguinisto · · Score: 1
      Indeed! I still have the el-cheapo pager, but it does fine for the load I carry (I support R&D now, which is pretty light compared to the previous 24/7 production environment I did).

      Now, if the iPhone had a terminal w/ an ssh client installed on it, I'd run out and grab one of those in a heartbeat, even in my specific case... imagine doing a patch-run from the beach. :)

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re:Ditto what he said. by afidel · · Score: 1

      It wasn't quite from the beach but I've done password resets from the park on a nice summer day =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Ditto what he said. by savuporo · · Score: 1

      I can now do many non-complicated tasks from anywhere (such as at the bar). Thats one of the hidden dangers of this: sysadmins tend to turn up from remote places in conditions where you dont really want or need them, they are capable of more harm than good. While im not advocating working shifts in office, it at least has one benefit to the employer: people are more reliably there in working condition when you need them.

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    6. Re:Ditto what he said. by Zenaku · · Score: 1

      Mine does. Jailbreaking the iPhone was worth it in my opinion.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    7. Re:Ditto what he said. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Eh, I'm not getting blasted most of the time, my teens are well behind me. On the one occasion that I did get a call when I was not in a condition to be working I plainly said so and reminded my boss I was not on call that week. Doing a password reset after 1-3 beers is not something that has any potential to harm my employer and allows me to actually have a life.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:Ditto what he said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'd rather have 24x7 access to work and limited access to my personal life, since that is where the stress comes from.

    9. Re:Ditto what he said. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Things go pear shaped when people that do not have the authority to pay overtime etc get hold of that pager/mobile number and call you in with disaster in their voice for what turns out to be trivia you can not be paid for. I've lost three days of holidays so far this year that way.

    10. Re:Ditto what he said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Demand?

      You'd be out on your arse if you tried that with me.

      You'll be one of those guys who complains that his job is outsourced overseas and can't get a job after you're fifty.

      And you'll have no idea why.

    11. Re:Ditto what he said. by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      You'll be one of those guys who complains that his job is outsourced overseas and can't get a job after you're fifty.

      Fortunately for the rest of us, you're a mere posturing nobody who likes to claim he's some sort of CxO... negotiations do work both ways, and only the weak and the fearful consistently fail to hold up their end of it.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  15. the answer is.... by yoha · · Score: 1

    yes

  16. Not sure about Blackberries... by Diomedes01 · · Score: 1

    But simply have a corporate-issued laptop with VPN power to connect remotely has been both a blessing and a curse. A blessing, because I can work from home frequently. A curse, because I find myself still doing work-related activities at 9:00 PM without even thinking about it. I'd be lying if I said this hadn't led to some marriage-related stress; it is tough to make and stick to work/life boundaries when work is constantly available.

    --
    "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
    1. Re:Not sure about Blackberries... by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It may be trite to say it, but...

      If you were to die tomorrow, this would affect your family for the rest of their lives. You are irreplaceable. Your company would fill your position within days and except for your immediate co-workers, nobody would even care.

      --
      blah blah blah
    2. Re:Not sure about Blackberries... by egomaniac · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you were to die tomorrow, this would affect your family for the rest of their lives. You are irreplaceable. Your company would fill your position within days and except for your immediate co-workers, nobody would even care.

      Not always the case. I got very tired of the working conditions at $VERY_LARGE_COMPANY and was vaguely entertaining the notion of leaving. Another company that was familiar with my work contacted me out of the blue and asked me for a resume. A week later I had a job offer in hand and gave notice.

      $VERY_LARGE_COMPANY panicked. They had three different managers call me and try to convince me to stay, offered me a raise, more stock, better working conditions, etc. I told them that they should have done that before I got so fed up that I decided to quit, but that I would be more than happy to answer emails if they needed help with anything after I left.

      I talked to a couple of my former coworkers recently. Turns out that a few months after I left, they gave up on finding a replacement, disbanded my old team and moved further development for the product I had been working on (which is used by millions of people and has at least one book written about it) to Bangalore, where it is languishing. And it's not like it was a crufty mess, either -- it was clean, very thoroughly documented and there were several developers who were very familiar with it. Unfortunately, they were also very junior, and apparently judged unfit to be in charge of it.

      The moral of the story? Don't assume that just because you work at $VERY_LARGE_COMPANY that you're just a faceless drone and they'd be able to replace you at the drop of a hat. And conversely, if you're a manager at $VERY_LARGE_COMPANY, make sure you give your employees appropriate treatment before they're ready to walk out the door.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    3. Re:Not sure about Blackberries... by bmccartney · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, senior developers are very hard to replace. I actually left my job for a few months. They wouldn't trust/couldn't find a replacement, and bought me back. I now work 20 hours a week for more than twice the pay -- along with a good piece of the action...

    4. Re:Not sure about Blackberries... by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Absolutely right, what I mean is this: the large corporation needs your skills. Your skill set / experience may be very costly or difficult to replace. But your loved ones care about *you*. They couldn't find someone else with your same skill sets to replace you, because to them you are irreplaceable. I was just trying to show the absurdity of people misplacing their priorities. Killing yourself for a corporation is crazy. That's all I meant.

      --
      blah blah blah
    5. Re:Not sure about Blackberries... by syousef · · Score: 1

      I talked to a couple of my former coworkers recently. Turns out that a few months after I left, they gave up on finding a replacement, disbanded my old team and moved further development for the product I had been working on (which is used by millions of people and has at least one book written about it) to Bangalore, where it is languishing. And it's not like it was a crufty mess, either -- it was clean, very thoroughly documented and there were several developers who were very familiar with it. Unfortunately, they were also very junior, and apparently judged unfit to be in charge of it

      Yep, some random coder from Bangalore is much more fit to be in charge of it. Good thinking 99. Sounds like $VERY_LARGE_COMPANY isn't managed very well.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    6. Re:Not sure about Blackberries... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yep, some random coder from Bangalore is much more fit to be in charge of it

      It appears that the tactic is the random coder from Bangalore works on it for six months then moves onto another project. $VERY_LARGE_COMPANY may think they are paying for cheap coders but they are really paying for the training of a string of recent graduates.

    7. Re:Not sure about Blackberries... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Also, be sure to let managers know when you are unhappy, or want something else.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Not sure about Blackberries... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'm soon to be the only senior programmer my company has - the rest have either left or are working their notice, with one exception (and he's going to resign next month, apparently).

    9. Re:Not sure about Blackberries... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      You were wise not to stay though. I agree - the time for retention bonuses and concessions is BEFORE somebody turns in their resignation. If they can't treat you well before you quit, then they won't treat you well for long afterwards. It also leads to a strained relationship.

      Employers would be well-served to consider just how important key staff are. Not everybody is essential to retain, but a LOT of people are. More than just your well-paid managers.

    10. Re:Not sure about Blackberries... by martinX · · Score: 1

      Turns out that a few months after I left, they gave up on finding a replacement, disbanded my old team and moved further development for the product I had been working on (which is used by millions of people and has at least one book written about it) to Bangalore, where it is languishing.

      So that's what happened to Netscape!

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  17. I'm eagerly awaiting... by pigiron · · Score: 1

    direct brain implants.

  18. Turn it off. by orionop · · Score: 1

    Remember everybody, nobody owns you. You can turn off your phone when you feel like it. You have free-will, use it at your discretion.

    1. Re:Turn it off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes master. I have free will.

  19. Qui bono by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFS: "senior executives claiming a BlackBerry can contribute to work/life balance by facilitating telecommuting and more flexible schedules. "

    More flexible for whom? Where I work, that seems to be a one way flexibility. Senior executives are making (SWAG alert) 3x - 10x what I am making. They have made the choice to have a large stake in how the company performs. While I have a stake, of course, it's just not as large or worth my personal/family life. It seems like despite being more accessible, people's work hours never get shorter. And that's what it's about in the end, isn't it? Getting more done in less time? But in rality, it just seems that it's about getting more done in more time. No good. I am glad I have no blackberry.

    --
    blah blah blah
    1. Re:Qui bono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also from TFA, it's Australian government. So you're talking about public servants.
      How much bargaining power do you think they have with their employer? I'll give you a hint, it starts with bugger and ends with all.

      Granted most public servants I've worked with / spoken to have things pretty sweet, but everyone with their "just tell your boss how it is!" argument is obviously not aware of how the public service works down here

  20. depends on your responsibilities by mihalis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To me the blackberry is a blessing, because it helps me find out about things sooner. If I didn't find out about some things on the blackberry, then I'd only find out about them when I next get to the office, except more time would have elapsed and the urgency would be higher. So for me a little bit of intrusiveness (urgent email when I'm on my way home) is more than offset by reducing the stress of getting to work and finding shit happened last night and I wasn't aware).

    However I do establish limits on the intrusiveness of the blackberry. Mine never buzzes for email and is switched off entirely from about mid-evening to around breakfast the next day. During that off period people can contact me on my cellphone if they really need me.

    If there isn't that time critical element to a persons responsibilities then I can imagine it being not worth it.

  21. My approach to communication... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    My take on all this is, I like to be well connected but hard to reach.

    Blackberries I don't find appealing, because they have too many triggers to allow people to get to you right then - from email to paging to phone. It's really the email that's the worst, Blackberry users seem to stop whatever they are doing right that second to read and answer an email.

    People need to be willing to let the mail queue at least a little bit... it would be nice to have a device have some kind of setting to only allow a notice once in a given time period (say every half hour).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  22. It's about being on call for emergencies. by Egdiroh · · Score: 1

    So the real place this comes into play is if you are on call for emergencies. If you are and you just have a phone then some one has to consciously escalate something to you as en emergency to pull you away from your life. If emergency and regular work email all get to you through the same channel then you have to keep checking the email box and evaluate all the incoming email, and you have to decide whether or not to treat something like an emergency, and since the consequences for being wrong can be severe you are likely to respond to a bunch of things that can wait til the next business day.

    So if you already have an irrevocable work/life boundary you are safe, but if there are some degrees of work that may always interfere with your life a device like a blackberry can make work more invasive.

  23. I'm available when available, by schnikies79 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not when I'm not.

    Seriously people, if you don't want to be bothered at home, make it clear. My company had no problem with that. Turn off the company phone/blackberry/whatever or at least stand your ground. Granted I don't work in IT so I don't know what common policies are like=, but I am on call, during certain hours. If they call outside of those hours, they will get a polite no (they have never tried).

    --
    Gone!
    1. Re:I'm available when available, by chiefthe · · Score: 1
      As some one who works at home for more than half the week, one must set boundaries.

      I put a reasonable amount of time (at least 40 hours) no matter what and add to it if required per project. When I am done for work with the day, I am done. I leave my smart phone and work computer in my office and ignore them, having a pleasant, work-free evening or weekend.

      If I was on-call, it would be a different story, but luckily, I don't have that to deal with now. chiefthe

      --
      This was a quote of Kurt Vonnegut that didn't fit.
  24. IF callID == 'BOSS' HIT silent by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 0

    To me, it's not much different than a cell phone.

    1. Phone rings
    2. See caller ID.
    3. IF callID == 'BOSS' HIT silent
    4. ???
    5. More leisure/beer time... profit!

  25. Executive toys perhaps? by TechnoBunny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do the executives wnat them for the reasons stated, or do they want them as a status symbol when they're on the golf course?

    1. Re:Executive toys perhaps? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      Do the executives wnat them for the reasons stated, or do they want them as a status symbol when they're on the golf course?

      That's half of it. The other half does appear to be the ability to keep their tentacles around their employees, keeping them available at all times.

  26. Govt employee here... overtime consideration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an IT employee for a "state & local" govt organization in the US.
    When we first started granting remote access for people to work at home, our legal dept determined that whenever someone accesses even just simply reading their office email from outside, beyond the scope of the normal work day, then it can be deemed to be working overtime. Due to this reason only salaried "exempt" employees could be granted remote access with the explicit instructions that remote access was to only be used for critical work and emergencies and they have to keep a detailed journal of when they use remote access and why and what work was done. It's made remote access almost more hassle than it's worth. Now that we have Blackberries, there's the added constraint that every employee issued one must keep a log of all personal, non-govt-business phone calls they make from the device, which will be compared against the master wireless bill each month, and the employee has to pay reimbursement for those calls.

  27. Re:Im constantly monitoring not necessarily availa by pcsmith811 · · Score: 1

    First thing I did years ago when I got a BlackBerry was turn the email notification sounds/vibrations off. Aside from the fact I get way more email that I'd like to, I know I would want to check it once I hear it. By having it off, I check it on my terms. I don't have a typical 8-5, have to be in the office job, so for me the BlackBerry is a huge asset and time saver. When I wake up in the morning, the first thing I do is grab my BlackBerry and see how my day is lining up so far. Occasionally, I get a sneak a bit more sleep :) Also, change your emails signatures to be identical from both your email client and BlackBerry and people won't know where you sent it from!

  28. Re:Im constantly monitoring not necessarily availa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with this.

    After accidentally destroying my Motorola Razr, which I received alerts on, I went ahead and purchased a Blackberry Curve, the 8320.

    The difference in phones is astounding, and not only that, the service was cheaper with the different provider I chose--and gave me many more options.

    I can even use the blackberry as a modem to get online if my cable connection goes out, power, what have you.

    I work remotely much of the time, and this blackberry lets me take my office anywhere I can use my laptop--and with the chat and email, I might not even be anywhere near my laptop, (such as slacking) and still respond to mail and chats and give the appearance that I am at work (chat is used as the "are you working" sort of attendance roll call), or can respond to things while on the way somewhere.

    Before the black berry, being on call (with a 15 minute response time) meant being chained home during the on-call times. Not anymore. As long as I am within driving range of the data center, I can go out and do anything, and connect remotely with the blackberry as a modem. Sure, I have to take the laptop with me--but I can go out to eat, or even grocery shopping--without having to ditch the cart and rush home to check out a critical problem.

    Granted, if my staff had more people, I wouldn't have been so restricted, so I had to think of a way to increase my flexibility. Cell phones are a leash, but the Blackberry makes that leash considerably longer.

  29. Auto-on/off setting actually works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I started using a BlackBerry 950 in 1999. Having been tethered with a numeric pager for 3 years in a prior operations job, I immediately set expectations about carrying it and responding to it after hours. I wasn't in an operations job anymore, so i wouldn't. If they needed me bad enough, they could look up my home phone number in the phone book and call. I don't believe in cell phones either.

    Then I found the "auto-off / on" setting and had it turn off at 6pm and back on at 7am. Done.
    A few years later, the new Blue-Berry model came out and I was part of a trial to determine if 14K upgrades were needed. Nope. Only the Mobitext network change forced that a few years later. However, I quickly set my auto-on/off settings to 6p/7a and didn't have **any** non-important email forwarded to it. I like to read and handle email only once since I was getting 300+ messages a day. Seeing them more than once is a waste of my time. After a while, everyone got used to me not responding immediately to emails (I was a technical architect, not some Project Manager or operations or other job where I can make up answers without double checking them first), including my chain of command. Managing expectations.

    Fortunately, my managers never seems to have an issue with those settings because I almost never left something hanging that needed to be handled that day when I left. About 3 times in the last 8 years did I keep the pager on overnight, but I always KNEW that something could happen that would need my attention on a project. I routinely worked 20-50 projects each year from adding 2 disks to installing 60 fairly large HP servers across 15 locations ($24M budget) with redundant DS3 networking between them all.

    I retired about a month ago at 41 yrs old. Nice work if you can get it. I turned in my laptop, SecurID, and BlackBerry 8200. I honestly don't miss them. I do miss the people, however. In fact, I'm meeting an old work friend for lunch today.

    Blackberry's are a tool. Use them as such, don't let them, or your boss abuse you.

    1. Re:Auto-on/off setting actually works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I retired about a month ago at 41 yrs old.

      *sigh* As someone who isn't that far away from 41, do you have any advice as to how you pulled that off? Personally I'm thinking I'm going to need to continue working until 115 before I can retire.

    2. Re:Auto-on/off setting actually works by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I'm 31 and my target retirement age is 50.
      It's all about going short early in life to get that 401K as big as possible early on. Then the lovely compounding will help out the rest. The hard part for me (and I want to know how GP deals with is also) is that swing till 59.5 where you can get to your retirement monies...
      Currently I don't have a plan for that 9.5 years (other than some savings and maybe part time work...)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  30. It is (or should be) very simple by Tall+One · · Score: 1

    Work is that place you go to 5x9. Anything else isn't work, and work shouldn't have an expectation that you're available during that time. If work needs additional coverage, they need to hire additional staff. Period. Leads to: more jobs, more free time (and yes, less take-home pay for the type-As. If they want more, they can work 2 jobs). If work can't afford to hire additional, they have no business trying to operate beyond 5x9.

    1. Re:It is (or should be) very simple by wild_quinine · · Score: 1

      Work is that place you go to 5x9. Anything else isn't work, and work shouldn't have an expectation that you're available during that time. My contract stipulates that I will be available 'hours as required'. So that's not a universal truth.
    2. Re:It is (or should be) very simple by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Why should a type A have to find a different job, when he can work 50 hours and get 10 hours at 1.5X salary rather than getting what's probably a part time job at a lower hourly rate than his work?

      Then there's also surge operations - rather than underemploy people through most of the year, or scramble to get temps, stipulate(and pay extra) extra hours during surge times - like christmas for retail, april for accountants, etc...

      Not everything fits the neat 9x5 schedule.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  31. Respectfully Disagree by dsginter · · Score: 1

    You are correct: employees *should* be able to manage this.

    But, in the real world, situations vary.

    Pagers have been around for millenia, Blackberrys simply give better message.

    With pagers, someone had to make the conscious decision to bother someone at the other end of a pager. With Blackberry devices, someone in Japan might send an email - when it is convenient for them - to someone in New York when it is not convenient. If the recipient hasn't configured the device's privacy schedule, then they will be notified of the email. Again - not everyone is a geek and configuring a privacy profile on a Blackberry isn't easy for everyone.

    I'd be inclined to agree with you completely if a technical fix weren't so trivial - if RIM simply created a privacy profile that could be enforced by employers, then we wouldn't be discussing this. If I set a week of vacation in my calendar, then the Blackberry should automatically force itself to disconnect during this period. And please don't get caught up in the minutiae - it goes without saying that exceptions could be easily accommodated.

    --
    More
    1. Re:Respectfully Disagree by jacksonj04 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've often wondered about why 'privacy' and 'silent' options on phones are so poor. What I'd like is the ability to set up rules similar to these:
      - Calls from this number are emergency, always ring.
      - Between 5pm and 9am, and all day weekends, defer this group to voicemail
      - When in 'meeting' mode send everyone to voicemail except for my boss, who gets a vibrate alert but not a ring.
      On andy device (Can you do those with Blackberry privacy profiles?). Perhaps also with some form of short range 'hinting' available for certain types of places, for example cinemas can suggest to your phone that they enter a discreet mode (Nothing except for your 'emergency' numbers for example), or for hospitals to suggest to phones that they enter a limited usage mode (Intensive care wards, A&E, theatres etc force phones to airplane mode)

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    2. Re:Respectfully Disagree by dissy · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered about why 'privacy' and 'silent' options on phones are so poor. What I'd like is the ability to set up rules similar to these: Ive had the exact same problems, and the closest solution i've found so far is using googles GrandCentral service. (Check out the 'features' tab.)
      And yes its free. Later they will be adding more features which may or may not be free, but the base service should according to google.

      It lets you setup rules like you want, and choose where to forward the call based on whos calling and what time. Others get dropped to youe grandcentral visual voicemail, which has a similar interface as gmail but to call history and voicemails, which you can forward/save as mp3 (Also insanely handy, as my current cell carrier only allows VMs to be saved for 14 days, then silently erases them.)

      It's not a perfect solution, and yes, cells should almost all have these features built in i agree.
      But until then... I hope this helps
    3. Re:Respectfully Disagree by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      I expect there is third-party software for smartphones which will do that kind of thing. Just as an example, searching for series 60 timed profiles found Handy Profiles, which would seem to be a step in the right direction. That's the first valid hit on the first search I tried.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    4. Re:Respectfully Disagree by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1
      With a basic blackberry "sort of". You can set it so that high priority emails cause your phone to beep or vibrate, but there isn't any distinguishing between the sources of calls, at least with mine. A lot of the stuff you ask for would be nice. You do have a bunch of profiles to choose from (and they are editable), so assuming you remember to change the profile when going to a meeting you can have it so it will only vibrate, or will be silent or whatever.

      At least at my work I get very few high priority emails (~1 a week), so if you were to let it be known that if they really need to get ahold of you during a meeting to send a high priority email then you could have that set to vibrate or ring.

      As for my two cents about the parent post: I don't mind my blackberry. I'm the sole IT guy for a cancer centre and I'd rather know somethings blown up than get into work and find out patients haven't been being treated because a system was down. Also, I can often be out of the office working with an individual PC when something acts up, again better to be able to get right on it then have everyone else not be able to work because I'm tinkering with something. My boss is very leniant and respectful of my time and worth, if I spend an hour answering emails the night before I can show up later the next day or take it as over time, or paid 1.5 time live. No questions asked.

    5. Re:Respectfully Disagree by genik76 · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, you can do all of this with modern Nokia phones. This is done by creating different profiles, and the ringing alert can be changed for each caller in the phone book. Profiles can also be set to be on for a time period, e.g. 9-17.

      I haven't tried doíng everything you want to have with my Nokia 6280, so if there is somebody who has, could confirm if my assumptions are true.

    6. Re:Respectfully Disagree by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      My N70 (S60) had the profiles and differing ringtones (Which I used as much as possible), but don't have any way of specifying different ring behaviours on a per-person-per-profile basis. I had a 'meeting' profile which sent everybody to vibrate, and a specific 'boss' ringtone, but no way of saying "in a meeting, make everybody vibrate except my boss". My boss's unique ringtone was only used if the ring volume was already up.

      Good suggestion on the subject of Nokias though, I'll have a look and see if there's anything more versatile available for Symbian.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  32. Blame the machine. by wattrlz · · Score: 1

    If you're really too lily-livered to just turn the machine off when you're alseep/with the kids/can't be arsed just say the darn this was broken/malfunctionning and get back to it when you can.

  33. It only shatters the boundary if you let it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work from home with my job. I have a blackberry, PC Access cards, and am on the team that pushes issues with our product to the engineering team. I'd like to think that I'm well-connected, however, living in Ohio, which isn't known for it's technological feats, I have an easy time in setting my work hours and not blurring the line between home and work -- I turn the VPN off. Unless I'm on Call, when I leave for the night, my Blackberry sits in my top desk drawer. I still do things online, and I still have time to sysadmin my own servers and do my own thing, and not blur the line -- even though it's a subset of my current job, I still need to do sysadmin type stuff to keep my skill-sets sharp. I spent time with the wife, and if I'm really bored after she falls asleep, I might sneak back into my office for a few hours to get a jump start on the next day's work.

    On the other hand, when I first started, I was constantly working, updating tickets at 3AM, trying to keep the upper hand with engineering. I do give a damn about my customers, but, it's not worth the added stress to myself and the family to be constantly working. I'm also not getting paid to work two shifts, so, why should I work them?

  34. a symptom of work-obsessed culture by magical_mystery_meat · · Score: 0

    It's quite simple. When people started expecting their work to also be fun, or a vehicle for personal fulfillment, they stopped minding when they were asked to work outside of office hours.

    To some of us, a job is something that we do for a paycheck. That means that we don't want to live "the lifestyle" and that we don't want our personal time to be intruded upon. You have to value something in your life higher than your work in order to understand this.

  35. This issue has come up for me several times by Tragedy4u · · Score: 1

    What some people don't get is that when your shift or day or whatever is done....YOU have the power to shut a Blackberry OFF. That off button can mitigate your work/life balance.

  36. Camel's nose problem by boyfaceddog · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many of the carckberry addicts got that way from gradually increasing service expectations, not managerial interdicts?
    The problem in my group isn't so much that my boss wants everyone to be accessible 24/7, its that my co-workers try to out-do each other in the customer service area. Coincidentally, the people who keep the most lusers happy usually get the best raises because they have the lowest number of complaints. I guess that some people would rather have a juicy raise than a good night's sleep.

    --
    Here will be an old abusing of God's patience and the king's English.
  37. how about compensation by imp3 · · Score: 1

    I'd be fine with this if my company paid me for any "on call" time. Any expectation for me to be availabe during my off-the-clock time should be compensated, regardless of utilisation of that time.

  38. Telling work when you're available... by bskin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To everyone saying they've told work when they'll be available on their Blackberry...

    It must be nice to be able to set the terms on which you'll work for the company. You must have a lot of leverage there. A lot of us are not so lucky.

    --
    hot foreign sheep.
    1. Re:Telling work when you're available... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Find a better job.

      Look, do you want money? Time? early retirement?

      Decide and focus on it. I like my time off. I could make 25% more money tomorrow if I wanted to. But my work week will shoot to 60+ hours a week, plus traveling. Right now I work 4 10s and have three day weekends every weekend. Funny thing is I get as much, if not more work done working this schedule. With everybody working 40 they want to get work done and go home. I almost never see a person come up to a cube to 'Just Chat'. Sure, they'll talk about life for a minute or two, but then it's to the point. Get it done.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Telling work when you're available... by stry_cat · · Score: 1

      You do too, just go out and get another job. You'll be a lot happier that you did. I know I've been happier every time I switched jobs.

    3. Re:Telling work when you're available... by dalguard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For everyone saying they have no choice, I wonder if you've actually tried. My company offers to pay your cell phone bill if you'll be available during off hours. One day the CFO/CIO said "by the way, I notice we don't pay for your phone" and I said "no, I don't want calls at home." He said he respected my decision and that I was the only one on his staff to have made it. The cell phone costs me $40 a month. That's what they're getting paid to take calls at home. Whatever, their choice.

      Try just not looking or not answering. Return the call during working hours. If they ask didn't you get my message, say no, I don't check messages off hours. Wait until they threaten to fire you.

    4. Re:Telling work when you're available... by krunk7 · · Score: 1

      It must be nice to be able to set the terms on which you'll work for the company. You must have a lot of leverage there. A lot of us are not so lucky.

      I don't like "being on call". I might be willing for the right price, but that price hasn't been offered yet.

      I also don't imagine I'd like cleaning porta poties. I've never done it, but it looks like a nasty job. Being that I find it distasteful, I've never applied to a porta pottie company. There have been times when it's taken me a while to find a job whereas if I were willing to clean porta potties I could have been immediately employed. There probably is a salary threshold where I'd be willing to consider cleaning porta potties, but it'd be pretty high.

      I hope you see where I'm going with this. If you hate cleaning up shit, don't apply for shit cleaning jobs.

    5. Re:Telling work when you're available... by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

      Sounds nice, I'd like that. What job is it?

    6. Re:Telling work when you're available... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Even if you don't switch jobs, mentally acknowledging that you have that option makes taking the crap a little easier sometimes. An unsigned resignation letter in your back pocket can bring a degree of mental peace too.

      Rich

    7. Re:Telling work when you're available... by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

      It must be nice to be able to set the terms on which you'll work for the company. You must have a lot of leverage there. A lot of us are not so lucky.

      Everybody has that ability. You interview for your job and the employer let's you know the requirements of the job. If you accept the job, you accept the requirements. If you don't like the requirements then you don't accept the job. If you're employer tries to change your job requirements after you've been hired you simply tell them that is not what you agreed to when you where hired. If you're willing to take on more responsibility then you should be properly compensated. If you're employer won't, then tell them you won't take on the additional responsibility and if they don't like it they are free to fire you. If you don't want to deal with the additional requirements at all, regardless of an increase in compensation, you're free to tell them the same thing.

      They may decide to fire you. That's their prerogative. Collect unemployment while look for a better opportunity and move on.

    8. Re:Telling work when you're available... by Tikkun · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it's a free country. No one tells you where to work, where to go to school, where to live, what trade to learn.

      You might try taking some responsibility for the outcome of your life and see where it takes you.

    9. Re:Telling work when you're available... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His. Find your own.

    10. Re:Telling work when you're available... by shiftless · · Score: 1

      It's not luck, it's having a set of balls and the willingness to put your foot down. On one of my previous jobs, my manager had the nerve to call me on a Friday night while I was out eating with some friends asking me if I could go home and dial in to work on a customer's site. I (diplomatically) told him that wasn't going to happen. I don't care that it's a major financial institution or how urgent their need is. It's the weekend and I'm off work. My paycheck was not large enough for me to drop what I was doing and go home to work on a weekend. I had a couple coworkers who did not have as much resolve; one of them became physically ill from the workload and stress placed upon him. I felt really bad that my employer abused such great employees, but I sure didn't feel bad about closing my laptop lid and walking out every day at 5 o'clock on the dot.

      Now I'm self employed, making less and working more, and loving every minute of it.

  39. Not for me by blhack · · Score: 1

    My workstation at work is so far and beyond anything that i have at home that replicating what i can do at my desk at home is impossible. I do mainly graphic design work, so a really big workspace is pretty important. Sure, my little tiny laptop can run gimp and scribus just fine, but it is just really really ineffective for getting any actual work done. Usually if I want/need to get work done (I really enjoy my job), I will just drive into work. Security is here 24/7...and sometimes the best work gets done in the middle of the night and on the weekends (at least for me).

    So yes, I have the ABILITY to remotely log into work, but aside from the occasional session on our As/400 machine, or SSH session on one of our linux servers (which is usually just me goofing around with perl anyhow, or messing with openvpn) i don't really do ANY work from home...

    my $0.02....oh, and a shameless showing-off of my workspace! Bragging ;-) /i just realized i use a LOT of open soure software for work (apache, vsftpd, linux, scribus, gimp, mysql, openvpn, ...(i'm sure theres more) THANKS COMMUNITY!

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    1. Re:Not for me by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Three monitors is what is considered bragging on slashdot these days?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Not for me by debest · · Score: 1

      Nice IBM Model-M keyboard, there. (First thing I noticed!)

      --
      Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    3. Re:Not for me by blhack · · Score: 1

      Thanks :)

      Note of extreme-nerdery: it has the same birthday as i do!

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    4. Re:Not for me by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I wish I could have one at work, but people get annoyed at the loud clicking of the keys. So I have to make do with one of the knock-off's out there, the one I use was make by HP.

  40. It's your choice. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    Email doesn't feel intrusive precisely because it /isn't/ immediate. You haven't actually contacted the person until the time they choose to allow it. It's only "any time, any place" if you choose to sit there glued to that damned screen. Put the CrackBerry down and walk away. You'd be amazed how many people will never notice you're ignoring them.

  41. I can't stand Blackberries by packergundo · · Score: 1

    I think they have done more to break down the work/home distinction than any other modern tether. The problem with them is that if you have one you are usually expected to respond to all email that comes in, regardless of the actual urgency of the email. If a device like a Blackberry can be used to get away from the office equal to the amount of time that the office intrudes on personal life, I'm all for it. But more often then not you are expected to put in your 40+ hours at the office and then be on instant on-call once you leave the office. They are not used for balance, but rather for intrusion. I have a cell modem that I use to dial-up when I'm on the train, and so I use it to leave the office early and come in late about once a week. In other words, my company understands that the balance extends both ways. They get to intrude on my home life, so my home life gets to intrude on work. I work late when when work issues come up, so when home issues arise I come to work late. I use the devices to create the balance, not to let work intrude.

  42. OFF by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, all the communications devices I own have an off switch. I use them frequently.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  43. From a VPN point of view by NaleagDeco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't have a Blackberry but I was finally given access to our corporate VPN ... which is the greatest thing ever as far as I'm concerned. It means I can leave the office, relax in different surroundings (the house or the coffee-shop) and hack away in a change of scenery. Better yet, if something strikes me at ten p.m. I can log in instead of trying to hold onto an idea until the morning. I find, however, that when I leave work I'm very conscious of having spent my eight hours sitting in front of a screen ... I'm aware that this is my downtime (i.e. more expendable but more treasured) and I try to enforce that. As such, I've never found myself lost in work at home.

    --
    "Shoot for the moon, even if you miss, you may hit a tree"
    1. Re:From a VPN point of view by ps236 · · Score: 1

      The difference between being allowed VPN access and having something like a Blackberry is that you have to decide to go to your PC and log on to the VPN and do something. Whereas, with the Blackberry it shouts at you for attention (unless you turn it off)

      IMHO a Blackberry is 'worse' than text messaging on a phone because it's often easier to send an email than a text message. Also, everyone knows that a text message arrives immediately. Some people may not realise that an email will get through to the Blackberry immediately as well, they may expect it to wait until morning.

      IMV, a Blackberry should be a purely voluntary thing for most employees. Whether that means deciding whether to have one at all, or being able to turn it off once you walk out of the door (in which case why have one?). Text messaging works for urgent messages.

      I can see them being useful for people who travel as part of their work, but that doesn't describe most people who have them... Why should someone who is at a desk in the office all day have to have one unless they want one? The ONLY possible reason is to intrude into their home life. If they want to work from home on some days, lend them a laptop with VPN access, you can't do much 'real' work on a Blackberry anyway, so they'd need a laptop to do most jobs in any case.

    2. Re:From a VPN point of view by Creepy · · Score: 1

      same, but VPN means when I'm working 16+ hour days 6 or 7 days a week during crunch (dictated by large customers that set hard deadlines and the marketing idiots^H^H^H^H^H^Hfolks that agree to them) I can still stop by home and see my wife for dinner.

      Working from a coffee shop is a bit harder for me - our Nortel VPN still doesn't work with Vista, but my laptop has Vista (and Linux, but they want me to pay for a Linux client - I've fiddled with IPsec a bit to get through without it, but haven't gotten it to work). I therefore use VNC to an XP box and use Remote Desktop from there to my work computer, but that doesn't refresh properly. If you're wondering why I don't VNC to another VNC connection, which does update properly, well, management made the wonderful decision to block VNC and SSH connections due to fear of stealing stuff from reverse connections (people with business majors should not make tech decisions...), so I'm SOL. Oh, and Remote Desktop doesn't tunnel, so I can't use that (a Remote Desktop to a Remote Desktop to a machine - it disconnects). I'm not aware of any other free options that would work, but maybe there is a solution out there that I'm ignorant of.

    3. Re:From a VPN point of view by KiahZero · · Score: 1

      I've tunneled with Remote Desktop before without a problem.

      --
      I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
    4. Re:From a VPN point of view by Creepy · · Score: 1

      If you know how, let me know - the desktop machine Remote Desktop always disconnects when I connect the laptop to it.

      I may also try Sunbelt, as well - I believe we have a site + home corporate license (will need to check on that).

  44. Boundary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went to work at Comcast, and they made it mandatory that I buy a cell phone. Not only that, they told me which carrier I had to go to. I accidentally mixed up Sprint and Nextel, knowing of their merger and thinking they were the same company. For that mistake, I was at first reprimanded. I fixed the mistake after 4hours at the mall. Then the wave of calls from my boss hit. I mean this dude called me every 5 minutes. Sometimes less. It got to the point where I got home and he would keep calling. I was using my own vehicle, and didn't want to drive and use the phone at the same time, and if I stopped everytime he called, I would not have made it to a single stop. Within a week, I was in the hospital with panic attacks. I still get them, but I don't have the job to pay for medical care. All I have is /. and my neighbors wireless signal that he lets me use. A constant state of worry started when Comcast broke the boundary of home/work. And even at work, it was a nightmare. I still have collection agents after me from the hospital, and from the two cell phone companies. Needless to say, the kids aren't having a Christmas because of Comcast, and their terrible policies.

  45. Bizzare telecommuting tale.. by Churla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My company has cel phone (not blueberries) on all the people in my group. We're the top end of problem solvers in the support side of the organization. They also encouraged us to work from home one day a week to help make up for the occasional weekend day or late night we were pulling.

    This ended when a director level person walked through our area one day and didn't see enough butts in seats for their liking. Now they wonder why they have so much trouble getting people to answer the cel phones and work those long/extra hours from home.

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
    1. Re:Bizzare telecommuting tale.. by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      I have been lucky to find an employer that allows me to work from home - in this case 1000s of miles away from the office in another state. I have put in extra effort to "justify" being allowed to do this, so I work 60+ hours per week and I'm constantly getting 'sucked in' to issues when I simply walked past my laptop on the way to the fridge and saw an email that looked interesting.

      I don't think I have any 'point' I'm trying to make here. But the things I've found out by working from home are...

      1) Tech makes it possible - without blackberry/DSL/WWW/VPN/putty there's no way I could have done this

      2) Working from home means more hours than working from an office and the isolation is hard on the family and me. (I'm there, but I'm not there - it's like a tease to my wife)

      3) I gain back the hours I would have wasted commuting, but I miss the daydreaming time that went with it (yes - I'm a terrible driver)

      4) I was able to move to a non-urban area that otherwise would not have supported my employment. That's great for me, housing is inexpensive (I'm driving up the pricing for the locals - boo) but it means that I'm doubly eager to keep my job. There are few local alternatives to keep me employed at anything approaching my salary.

      5) I drink way too much diet coke - the fridge is right at my feet

      --
      Nullius in verba
    2. Re:Bizzare telecommuting tale.. by salemnic · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the truth. I work from home myself, only going into the office when there is an important meeting, and also am up around that 60 hour a week mark. Working from home, I find, is much more of a problem for work/life balance. It's much harder to stop working, when everything is set up in a comfortable location that you pass by repeatedly every day.

      It's taken me months to learn how to put limits on it, and I agree with the wife statement there - very frustrating for her too.

      s

  46. Shatter it? Of course it does, and to my benefit! by Mr.Fork · · Score: 1

    There are a couple of reasons why its very beneficial to me having a smartphone (let's call it what they are). I also have my office phone forwarded to my cell which means my clients can reach me ALL day. No voice mail, no missed calls. Happy interactions and accidents all day. Here's why:

    1. If I come in late, I've already been responding to my emails and early morning calls on the bus 30 minutes prior. Tick tock - I'm getting paid for my time regardless where I am. +1 karma bonus

    2. If a client calls me (internal or external) they can actually talk to me. And I can check my calendar for future availability and schedule meetings while on the phone.(i.e. portable office)+2 Karma bonus.

    3. If I'm walking between meetings, I check my calendar for recently sent appointments or meeting notices - it keeps me plugged in and on time - not a bad thing becuase it improves my work performance and perception that I'm punctiual and a good employee.+1 Karma bonus

    4. If I'm leaving work, and someone calls, they hear and ask - "are you out of the office" "yes, I'm heading home but that's ok - how can I help you?" It means that my clients think I'm committed to the services I provide. +3 Karma bonus.

    5. Finally, if I forget a document, or an email with key details, it's always at my beck and call by simply looking it up on my device. It also means I have answers to questions that can come out of left field - making me seem prepared for all challenges. +1 Karma bonus.

    Besides, the text messaging to my staff during a meeting is a huge tactical bonus - "What is this issue about blah blah" texted staff-"It was because of this" - making me appear connected to my happenings. Of course, I may get texted msged "THE EMAIL IS DOWN. RUN!" It also gives me ample time to hide. :)

    --
    Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. - Peter F. Drucker
  47. My 2 cents. by Drakin020 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Here is the issue I had. I am a Network Admin for a company of about 60 users and 25 servers. When I first started my Boss was the director of IT. He had his Blackberry and for the most part did all the work not directly related to servers and Cisco equipment. He always warned me that if I step to far out to help or take care of an issue, that I could never step back. 1 year later I still work for this company and I am now the director of IT. I have hired a new guy as a programmer and IT mook to setup new users and what not. I now have a Blackberry and I see what my old boss meant. Now that I respond to emails, it's like your EXPECTED to be "Johnny on the spot." If you don't then you get a negative look on your shoulders. Yeah you can balance work with home, but when your users start taking advantage of you it begins to consume your life. It becomes more routine to have to check your email every hour, and respond to specific issues. Yeah I could simply turn my phone off, but again... you will have CEO's CFO's COO's who expect that work to be taken care of or at least responded to that night. When you start to cut back people begin to ask questions "Does this guy still care for the company?" To this day I somewhat regret getting my phone and reaching out. Yeah being the Admin here I do need to be "Johnny on the spot" but only for more critical issues, like the Exchange Server went down.

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    1. Re:My 2 cents. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      60 users and 25 servers?

    2. Re:My 2 cents. by Drakin020 · · Score: 0

      Um...yes? What's the problem?

      --
      The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
  48. Differing Viewpoints by ChromaticDragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did anyone notice the stark contrast between the view of the Executives and the workabees?

    The Executives believe that the Blackberries can facilitate telecommuting and a balance between life and work. The grunts fear this is just a way to ensure longer workdays.

    Why do you think that might be?

    Could it be that relative to the workers, the execs don't really have that much work to balance with their life?

    I think there is at least one other very important aspect here relative to telecommuting. Telecommuting really only works when there are a few key ingredients:

    • Trust. The manager needs to trust the worker.
    • A way to measure work. I find the managers the most comfortable with telecommuting, flex-time, etc., were those in situations where counting widgets was easy. If there is no clear way to measure output, this becomes a bit more of a challenge.
    • Good management, including proper escalation. My current management has clearly expressed that they expect routine escalation since we're understaffed. We're all comfortable about it since it then becomes the manager's job to prioritize. A bad manager simply attempts to appease everyone and twist the arms of employees to get them to do everything despite burnout.
    If you are in a situation where the environment isn't already very comfortable with flex-time, telecommuting, etc., picking up a device which may lead others to expect immediate responses to email at all hours of the day may be a rather horrible idea.
  49. As someone who isn't in an on-call type profession by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

    There are times I honestly wish work would call me when I'm off duty to ask about things. At least once a week something happens where people aren't sure of what to do in a given situation so they just make something up and I'm left to clean up the mess the next day. Would it be worth the five minutes of personal time to save that hour of work time? Usually. The only downside I see is that if I didn't spend most of my days putting out fires I end up not having a whole lot to do.

  50. I am reading this on my blackberry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....sitting in the bathroom.

    I'd say it helps to multi-task.

  51. How having a blackberry has affected me. by venturaville · · Score: 1

    I am in IT and I have to carry a phone for on-call purposes. I have seen the transition to blackberries happen at my own work. On the sum of things, I believe that the blackberry has been somewhat more beneficial for me as compared to those with whom I work. Unlike a lot of them, I turn off all email notifications. Instead I rely on SMS alerts for emergencies, and only read email when I feel like it. This keeps me from feeling stressed about having to answer every single email right when it comes in. There are other things you can do to control the email flow (filters, important/normal flags, etc.). The blackberry has helped me as I am able to be somewhat useful even when I am on the bus traveling into work. Blackberries (as well as an increasing number of other phones) can do a lot of what a wireless radio enabled laptop can do. Instant messaging, web browsing (including corporate networks), bluetooth headphones, as well as SSH, VPN, telnet in a pinch.

  52. Re:Shatter it? Of course it does, and to my benefi by nysus · · Score: 1

    The difference is you have clients. You are your own boss. But if you are a wage slave where the rewards for your good performance are much more indirect (if there are any), it's a huge intrusion into your life. Most people would rather stop thinking about work when they clock out and I don't blame them one bit. Try to put yourself in their shoes.

    --

    ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

  53. Would prefer blackberries still by dindi · · Score: 1

    They are messengers. Messengers are not as intrusive as a phone call. A phone call has to be answered (optimally) while an instant message can be answered with a delay.

    But then again, my feng shui is broken anyway, my office is my living room, and I have 6 computers on all the time - well since I am a treehugger they hybernate/powersave themselves as much as possible.

    I still prefer IM as I can simply ignore them, and my asterisk server goes into "we are closed this time" mode for business calls after 7pm, and does not allow anyone in after 9pm (unless you enter an emergency code, which is only known by close family)

  54. Dangerous to Health by SilentChris · · Score: 1

    I'm a systems administrator. I have had a Blackberry for several years but only recently started checking it constantly.

    In my opinion, it has been dangerous to my health. Previously, when a server would have an issue (major or minor) I wouldn't really address it until users started complaining. Sometimes I'd get an email notification, sometimes I wouldn't -- regardless, repair wouldn't begin until 9 AM the next day.

    Some people may view that as bad administration (and it is, to a degree), but there was a clear delineation between when work ended and "brain reset" time began. Now, I'm constant checking my Blackberry, always monitoring servers, etc. Great work ethic, right?

    Problem is: I can't sleep at nights. I wake up at 4 AM to check backups. I check that the work other admins have done has been done correctly.

    Work never "ends". I'm always getting the emails about new work that needs to be done. Recently I went to the doctor because I had tremendous stomach pain. Turned out to be something I ate and stress. I've lost weight (unintentionally).

    People may say (and they're right to a degree) that it is my own psychosis that's the issue. Clearly I haven't delineated in my own mind what is "important" work and what isn't -- what needs to be checked constantly and what doesn't.

    However, to say the Blackberry isn't contributing to this is crazy. Years ago, nobody would communicate with me from work after I went home. Now I'm constantly being communicated with -- there's no way to shut it off (without fear of a server blowing up somewhere).

    It's funny -- a few months ago there was a similar Slashdot story that mentioned Blackberries and I was on the side that they were helpful. Clearly, though, this one attached to my hip has caused great problems with my health. It's enough that I'm thinking of getting out of systems administration altogether.

    1. Re:Dangerous to Health by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your problem is not the needing the constant communication to verify everything is working as it should. The problem is your stuff is not running well and you don't trust the people you work with. Your company either need to hire people that know what they are doing, or let the people you have do their job. I am one of two network engineers with 300 users and about 60 servers. Among everything else like Exchange, the SAN, Citrix, the switching equipment, document management systems, VM, etc.. I maintain the backup system as well. I get an automated email at 9am that shows me a brief status of the previous nights backups. Our IT secretary manages the tapes including exporting (which is automatic) and sending them off site every day and I have not had to touch, look at, or even think about the backup system in at least 3 months which was when we upgraded to a newer version.

      Your systems running that bad IS NOT NORMAL and honestly, sounds completely fked up. If this is beyond your control like the company does not want to pay going rates for a good person or buy half way decent equipment, you should consider leaving. Really.

    2. Re:Dangerous to Health by Richy_T · · Score: 1
      Clearly I haven't delineated in my own mind what is "important" work and what isn't


      No, what you need to delineate is what's important and what's urgent (and what's critical). If it's not going to damage people, property or cashflow, it can wait until morning.

      Rich

  55. Believe it or not, constant-on has worked for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a sysadmin by trade, and I work for a large time-zone-spanning company that solely uses servers that have almost complete lights-out admin capability (and a 24/7 staff of trained monkeys on site when that fails. Though in this case I may have insulted trained monkeys...)

    If I have a network connection and my cellphone, I can get my job done from anywhere. I have, in the past, put in my 8-12 hours from various places-- Mom's house, varied poker junkets, travelling to help out a friend, whatever.

    Note I didn't say "on vacation"-- everyone needs their down time. But if I want to spend a few evenings in Atlantic City, I can bring the laptop, do my job by day, be a degenerate gambler in the evenings...

    Of course, I'm also in something of an ideal situation-- I'm actually getting to use the tools that can "facilitate work-life balance" for exactly that. My boss is cool with it, but I'm sure if the wackjobs who run the company knew what was happening, they'd put the kibosh on it in a hurry; to them, "work-life balance" is what happens when your work is your life so they're by definition balanced...

  56. I like on-line access by R3d+Jack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It means that I don't have to be in the office to take care of matters, which means more at-home time for me. As far as constantly checking my e-mail, I generally don't. Even if I do, that doesn't mean I have to respond. I also like knowing what to expect before I arrive at work. Bottom line, I'd rather be able to satisfy an overly demanding boss from home, rather than spending my evenings and Saturdays in the cube.

    1. Re:I like on-line access by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      The question you should be asking yourself is:

      "If the instant access didn't exist, would I be comfortable with a job that required me to spend hours beyond the 40 work week, onsite, working?".

      If you wouldn't, then you are volunteering to work for free, after office hours.

      This is not such a terrible thing, if you're getting some other benefit from this arrangement (telecommuting, flexible hours, financial compensation).

      As a system administrator, I didn't really have a problem with it either. As long as I had full control of the management of my servers, I could ensure their reliability would make it unlikely I would get a call off hours. Also, I actually looked forward at times to doing work on a saturday. Its less stressful than negotiating downtime with departments and managers, AS LONG AS IT WAS AN OCCASIONAL necessity.

      The problem is that any understanding/arrangement can be abused by stupid people, so its a good thing that both employer and employee audibly establish that understanding beforehand (such services can be made up with comp time, and paged only on specific emergencies.) If not, you have to decide whether you are willing to continue to work there.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  57. Public Employment and Blackberries by Ohio+Calvinist · · Score: 1

    The nice thing about being a public employee (or any classified shop with a decent union), is that even if you carry a blackberry, the second your fingers touch a keyboard from home, and its work related, you get instant overtime. If they say "no overtime" you can easily say "no work" and there isn't a foot for them to stand on. (see above caveat). The real luxury is that some shops (like mine) give you on-call pay of $3.40/hr if you're carrying a BB even if you don't get called, which turns into about $400 extra a paycheck. Getting a message here or there from the boss asking you to do something first thing in the morning, or server alerts is kind of nice, and better than a call from home for me.

    All that being said, it would be a cold day in hell before I'd carry one of these things if it was "just expected" that if my boss gets some crazy idea at 11:30 at night that I'm on the hook to do whatever he wants by 8AM the next day all the time, and I didn't have a union that would ensure that I got OT it, and cover me when I say "No" if he gets it in his head that he's entitled to my services, for free, after hours.

    --
    Forgive my spelling from time to time. I'm often posting during short breaks.
  58. Just how many channels do we need? by ChromaticDragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find it rather hilarious how many mechanisms we have for communication these days.

    But what is very interesting is the inconsistency of it all.

    I use the following means to communicate to my peers at work:

    1. Internet Messaging
    2. Work Telephone Number
    3. Mobile Telephone Number
    4. Email
    5. Home Telephone Number
    6. Pager

    Due to cost reduction efforts, many workers no longer have work cell phones nor pagers. But some do. Furthermore, many of us permit others to call us on our personal mobile phones but don't publish these numbers in the official directories.

    Next, for a variety of reasons different individuals seem to prefer one channel over another. I often go very long periods without even bothering to check voice-mail (which when coupled with extensive telecommuting renders futile attempts to contact me via that channel). Some in my group simply won't use Internet Messaging. Some aren't as responsive to email.

    A lot of this has to do with various coping mechanisms or frustrations. Some who do use IM get rather frustrated when half-a-dozen of us in a virtual meeting all conclude we need to involve them. Simultaneously they'll get half-a-dozen IMs asking questions or inviting them to join the meeting. Others of us cascade avenues of contact to minimize extra work. Those that need to know (i.e. management or close peers) do know how to reach us but all others are kept at arm's length so as to be able to prioritize work and avoid getting buried.

    When I here the complaints of these workers regarding Blackberries, it seems as if they're rather afraid of the expectation of fast response to email. At the moment they likely have any old excuse for not responding to email promptly. That'll vanish overnight.

  59. You are a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sure this makes a lot of sense. Stack up your corporation, with its billionaire owners, legions of lawyers, HR people and managers versus - yourself, a little techie who is just another gear in the big machine. In the US, inflation-adjusted wages have not been stagnant over the past 35 years, they've been dropping, while working longer hours. This I think is primarily due to lots of clones of yourself, quixotically trying to fight the entire system by themselves. Your grand solution is if one of the companies is below the low level of par that exists now, you can leave, which is kind of like a slave threatening to run off to another plantation if the master whips him more than normal.


    Of course, I'm sure you're a genius and you can try to impress us with stories of how your managers love you so much you go to work when you wanted on your last job.


    Idiots like this guy is why the average union electrician has a better career than the average. But of course, why should such a genius as you have to deal with things like job security and seniority - since you have no social life and your life revolves around work, you are superior to your co-workers and recognition of that is the important thing. Barf.

  60. Union, Yes! by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's how it's done in a union shop. This is an Animation Guild contract.

    Time worked on the employee's sixth (6th) workday of the workweek shall be paid at one and one-half (1 1/2) times the hourly rate provided herein for such employee's classification. Time worked on the employee's seventh (7th) workday of the workweek shall be paid at two (2) times the hourly rate provided herein for such employee's classification.

    Minimum call for the sixth (6th) and seventh (7th) days shall be four (4) hours. In the event the actual time worked by such employee exceeds the four (4) hour minimum, s/he shall be paid for all time actually worked in 1/10th -hour increments.

    All time worked in excess of fourteen (14) consecutive hours (including meal periods) from the time of reporting to work shall be Golden Hours and shall be paid at two (2) times the applicable hourly rate provided herein for such employee's classification.

    Now that's the way it's supposed to work. There may be crunches when hours are long, but pay goes up, which discourages employers from overdoing it.

    Note the "minimum call" provision. Calling someone at home to do work outside of normal hours triggers that, and costs the employer at least 4 hours pay. Again, emergencies are provided for, but they're billable, so employers don't overdo it.

  61. I don't even like being tethered with 'IM' by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    I'll do email. I'll take phone calls (but often I will let the machine filter the call, first).

    I refuse to do IM. I feel too tethered with that. I like the store/forward idea of email. get an email, reply to it, you are done. IM is too chatty and requires you to BE there at the time. tethering. I hate it. too many people just accept, it though - and that's scary.

    I have a cell phone for emergency use, that I leave in the car. I also don't like having a phone with me. I don't want to live where so many redundant modes of communication all seem 'necessary'.

    if you are expected to carry a pager or BB, then they expect they will be using it offhours. slippery slope, of course.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  62. works for me by hvulin · · Score: 1

    I work from home-office and it works great for me... I arranged with my manager to which extent will my work interfere with my life and we stick to that. At least now I have an option to do a lot of off-hours work from home!

  63. Production Support by phlamingo · · Score: 1

    I work production support as a DBA. Even though we have an on-call rotation, I might get a call or page at any time. To make things worse, I work from home 100%, so I am essentially always at the office.

    I don't have a Blackberry, but I have a rather ordinary cell phone, which these days includes the capability to get SMS messages from any goober with an email account. The thing is, I have the servers send me alerts directly on certain events, and can often fix a problem before Ops even knows about it.

    However, I am a contractor, and get paid for every hour I work. If I was a salaried employee, you can bet I would be pushing back on this kind of intrusion. And that, I think, is the key. As long as your employer pays no penalty for disturbing your personal time, it is not your personal time.

    --
    I had forgotten how much cooler teenagers look when they are smoking. Oh, wait ...
    1. Re:Production Support by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ah yes, salary. There is an abuse foisted onto IT by corporations. In every state I've looked into it, non-management IT staff isn't supposed to be salaried. Did you know there are rules about who can be salary? Based on work and responsibility.

      Another area where IT workers get shafted.

      Did you also no IT workers are exempt from Federal overtime rules if they make more then about 28 bucks an hour?

      The IT worker need a country wide guild just so they can have enough lobby power to stop getting screwed. No this is not the same thing as the unions from the 70's.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Production Support by magical_mystery_meat · · Score: 0

      b-b-b-but we're all precious snowflakes who would rather eat shit than have our jobs can't be devalued by collective bargaining!

      That's the attitude of American IT workers.

    3. Re:Production Support by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Did you also no IT workers are exempt from Federal overtime rules if they make more then about 28 bucks an hour?

      Are they also exempt from grammar rules?

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  64. depends on the individual (for me, it's great) by darkuncle · · Score: 1

    in all things, moderation. I turn my phone (HTC Hermes) off when I go to sleep, but mostly just because the incessant GSM buzz on my clock radio drives the wife and I nuts. I have to say, when I finally got email on my phone (push email, that shows up all the time), it made things SO MUCH BETTER for me. Primarily because now I can be connected and involved in what's going on without having to warm a chair at work (or in my home office), or even having to pull out my laptop. I can present the appearance of always being available and working, even when I'm neither. :) It does make me more efficient (when I sit down to _work_ at the laptop, I spend more time working and less time chasing mail), and certainly has made my life more flexible (I don't feel the need to be at the laptop all the time trying to stay in the loop and responding to the fire of the day). My family appreciates it, because I can telecommute (or just take a long lunch, or leave late in the morning or come home early) more easily and frequently, giving them my presence while still remaining visible at work (which keeps mgmt happy and ensures that projects don't get stuck waiting on a response from yours truly and that I am up-to-date on the issues du jour).

    I have co-workers that can't handle the mobile email though, because they don't know when to turn it off or just ignore it, so they end up looking like they're awake and working 24x7, but rarely get any time to truly relax and unplug.

    (yeah, yeah I mentioned wife and family ... substitute TiVO and gaming for those of you still single; the benefits are similar. :))

    --
    illum oportet crescere me autem minui
  65. Blackberry by m1k3g · · Score: 1

    I have found that having a Blackberry has greatly enhanced my work life balance. Having a manager who's not afraid to let us work from home, I can put in several hours each morning in the office and then finish the rest of my day from home. I get up early, get to work, finish whatever needs to be done and any morning meetings, then head home or run errands. All the while staying in touch with my coworkers & boss. At 5pm most communications stop anyway. What could be better?

  66. If you think managers do this for your flexibility by br00tus · · Score: 1

    ...then I have a bridge I want to sell you.

  67. It's not about Access, it's about Choice by NetSettler · · Score: 1

    Is constant accessibility freeing or just another chain around your neck?

    It's not about access, it's about choice. If you have the freedom to say "no", to turn it off, to refuse to carry it, you're going to be fine with it. If you don't, you're not.

    It's likely one of those areas like harrassment or discrimination, where people have different points of view not because they think in a fundamentally different way but because their personal experience is different. Such personal variation masks a lot of bad things. People tend to make decisions on the basis of problems they can see personally or have felt personally, not problems they can understand intellectually. So if they're not seeing/feeling the pain, they're not likely to be very accommodating.

    In the case of cell phones and blackberries, since the exploitation is done by the people with the choice upon people with no choice, there's a high potential for the people doing the asking either without realizing the effect, or without caring.

    If there were an absolute right not to be discriminated against by one's employer for having refused to start carrying a blackberry or cell phone or pager, that would be a big step forward. It's one thing if it's part of the initial job description you sign up for, and another if it's thrust upon you on penalty of losing your job. That's not a choice. Of course, the way things go, eventually there might be no jobs that didn't require you to waive this right as a condition of employment... but one problem at a time, I suppose.

    --

    Kent M Pitman
    Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

  68. Only if you let it. by Junta · · Score: 1

    If you have a choice in the first place of not having a smartphone at all, or having one, then you should have a more full range of choice, and be able to use that to your best advantage professionally, but at the same time having the discipline or backbone (whichever is applicable to the person) to shut it down/ignore it as if you didn't have it at all when appropriate.

    I think some people get too wrapped up in their work and absolutely need to know how to cut out and enjoy the rest of their lives. But even for them, a smartphone/constant access can be a good thing, depending on how overboard they are. Take for example on guy at work with a family I know. He feels he absolutely *must* be there, and will work from 8 am to 11 pm *frequently* (and is salaried). His wife will call and complain to him, and he says he just can't pull himself away. For someone like him, maybe he'd be working all hours of the day still, but at least be at home. He is someone who at least outwardly expresses he wants not to be at work, though who knows if that is his reality...

    Others are at risk who normally leave work, but don't have much backbone. If they have a *hard* excuse (I'm in a bus and can't possibly reach what you are talking about) they can get out of being overused. However, if they could easily get in from a technical standpoint, and they are left without a hard, physical fact to preclude them from doing the job, they can't say no.

    Personally, I feel I have a good balance down. I leave work no more than 10-15 minutes late, with the *rare* exception of an hour if something is really bad. I work from home in off hours maybe 2-4 hours over the course of a month, with no more than twice a year logging in on Saturday to do something in full. But I know when to disconnect and not look at all, knowing if something was so critical, a *human* will somehow find a way to call me, which happens rarely, and that rare occasion is when I can triage it and still either take no action or redirect to someone else if I so choose. Anything else I don't know about can always wait until my next business day.

    Of course, I don't have a data plan at all, but I don't think I'd be using a smartphone form factor to do my job to any significant extent, it's just not a job feasible for that usage. And most of the time I have full internet access throw my laptop somewhere anyway, and when I don't I'm probably either driving, eating, in a theater, or some other place where I couldn't possibly be productive, so I couldn't do anything anyway, so I can confidently say a smartphone wouldn't change my work habits one iota

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  69. What's the problem? by jafac · · Score: 1

    I don't see what the problem is.

    If I can process PERSONAL email and phone calls while I'm at the office, I can be an agent for my employer outside of my normal work hours.

    As long as boundries and expectations are healthy, and clear - I don't see the problem with this.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  70. Working Attitude by cybereal · · Score: 1

    I notice that nearly every post has the attitude about work that "you're on when you're on, and you're off when you're off." But, that's a fairly one-sided view of things. Personally, my work is my life. I grew up programming, it was my hobby, and now it's my job. But, it's still my hobby. So, when I hear something has gone wrong, hours after my usual shift is over, I am more than happy to get an email on my phone, and decide if it needs immediate attention.

    Usually it doesn't. Frequently I can send a simple response such as "It sounds like it might be a bug, I'll look into it tomorrow" and everyone's happy. Occasionally I decide it's important and get to work on a fix immediately, or begin discussion on how to address it or whatever. It's all part of why I'm appreciated, and quite frankly, besides occasionally going to a show or whatever, what else am I doing? The diversion is actually welcome at times.

    --
    I read the script, and I think it would help my character's motivation if he was on fire. -Bender
  71. Re:Shatter it? Of course it does, and to my benefi by mollymoo · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity, do you expect the same unusual level of commitment from your staff? If you do, do you pay them substantially more than the going rate? Oh, and I hope if you do text in the meeting you mention it - "Let me check, I'll drop a message to one of my guys.". If you just went ahead and did it the impression I'd be left with is no one of someone who is connected with their happenings, but of someone who is rude and disinterested.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  72. Blame the Job, not the technology by Greenisus · · Score: 1

    It all depends on your employer. I carry a Blackberry for work, but I don't worry about it at all. I'm almost *never* called after hours. Even without these things, I think stressful jobs would still creep into your personal life, regardless of what device you have clipped to your belt.

  73. I recently went through this..... by mordenkhai · · Score: 1

    I work for a 3rd party field rep company who handles many electronics manufacturers (Sony, Panasonic, Toshiba, Samsung, and a host of GPS companies as well). I have been a rep for quite some time and in Feb took a District management position overseeing half of California. The company got everyone a phone in April, I was issued a Treo which auto syncs to work mail every 30 minutes. This is my first management job, so I had a lot to learn, I was expected to work from 9AM-6PM Monday-Friday with a few calls to be made on the weekend for people who were late with work. At first I was getting calls as early as 7AM and as late as 9PM. I would check my mail all night, stop what I was doing and work on things whenever I was at my computer and I always spent a good hour right before bed on work. It really began to annoy my wife, alot. We talked about it, as she had worked in the computer industry and was used to this style of work and kept telling me to push back. It took me a while, like 6 months, but now I don't answer the phone after 7. I only check my email once before bed after work hours and not even every night, and despite not taking calls over the weekend unless its a repeat caller signaling emergency, my district numbers are on their way up and I have never been called to task for taking my own time as *my own time*. So all in all I agree the Employee has the power to set the tone and should do so. Obviously, you need to go about it correctly, but the fact is I got lucky as my boss the regional manager "broke" before I did as she was called all weekend any hour of the day so when she signaled to me that she was tired of it, it was easy for me to agree and push back to the office that I needed to be off at some point in the day. It was a new thing for our company, so I imagine it happened alot, I just dint hear of it given our lack of a central office for the field people.

  74. Yes but Increases Flexibility Too! by divisionbyzero · · Score: 1

    Most of what I do does not require me to be in the office or to work 9 to 5. So if I can work from home or work off hours and still get my job done, then I have a much higher quality of life. I do have to be careful to monitor how much I work though. It's easy to get burned out.

  75. How am I supposed to sell it if you give it away.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It drives me up the wall to see people work 40 or 60 hours of overtime for free. If it was their own business, I could see it, but this is to make corporate fat cats richer.

  76. A couple things by wilhelm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Chief executives think that it enhances flexibility for everybody. In my experience, those executives spend more time not in the office than basically everybody else - they're the king, and they can do whatever strikes their fancy. They give presentations to big clients, or go to see about buying other companies, or even just go golfing. Sure, it enhances their flexibility; they can still get their mails when they're (inevitably) elsewhere. For the rest of the suckers, they've gotta be in the office 8 hours a day anyway. So how does that enhance flexibility, when the people are already there?

    Second, on a more personal note, when I'm out of the office, I'm not working. Period. I'm not being paid hourly, and I don't feel the need to give away freebies. I don't have to go on-call at my current job, and unless I get scheduled for a downtime window, my work will still be there the next morning when I get back to the office. A few years ago, I realized that work is not everything. The paycheck is important, but there's much more to life than doing work. I have a lot of hobbies which I like doing infinitely more than working, and they occupy my time and interest just fine, thanks. I like visiting friends and traveling to new places, and I don't want to be interrupted while I'm doing either. If my boss and/or company require the level of fealty that a lot of companies seem to require these days, I'm working at the wrong place.

    Back when I was going on-call, I would do my on-call duties when it was my turn, and when it wasn't, I was not very nice about calls I received. I never slept well when I was on-call. I had my Christmas morning of opening gifts with my family interrupted by the on-call phone ringing one year. I used to carry a blackberry, and never read emails on it. The volume of what I got was so high, it quickly (like over the course of the first day or two I had it) turned into the boy-who-cried-wolf device; 99.9%+ of the mails didn't need a response, and the rest could have simply been replaced by an SMS or a phone call of "hey, we need help".

  77. It works both ways... by Awful+Truth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since your boss can reach you, you're not tethered to your desk. I find I am able to leave my office earlier, now that I am confident that I can address any critical issues that arise during my commute. I take a little bit of my office with me, but I get home much earlier, and more regularly.

  78. New toy factor creates precedence by fizzer82 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think for many, the problem is that when you first get it, you create a precedence. 2 years ago I got my first crackberry. It was purely for off-hours support only when I was on call.

    First couple weeks I'm thinking, oh hey fun, I can send work emails while bored on the crapper on a Thursday evening. People see the emails, and think I'm "working" all the time. Of course the email could've waited until Friday morning. But after you do that a few times, people are expecting responses.

    Learned my lesson, got a smartphone for off-hours stuff at my current employer, but I refuse to answer emails unless I'm scheduled on call for production support. If its important enough, and I'm not on call, they'll actually just call me. Which, of course, I let go to voicemail and only do anything if its a real emergency ;)
    1. Re:New toy factor creates precedence by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Lucky you. When my work calls me and I'm not on duty, it's a "Real Emergency" ie, something on fire or someone being assaulted :(

  79. It's dependent upon the individual by Alicat1194 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Surely it's more of a personality thing - either you're going to obsessively check your email, or you aren't.

    Admittedly, it could be a problem if management is pushing you to be on call without being 'on call', but there are ways around that too, depending on how devious you want to be (though I'm guessing you can only use the old 'my battery died' excuse a few times before they'll start to cotton on ;) ).

    --
    You can learn a lot about a person if you just take the time to inject them with sodium pentathol
  80. Non-profit offered me one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I volunteer at the local youth sports league, doing some work on their website for them. They offered to get me a blackberry (I had told them I didn't have a cell phone, when in fact I did), and I politely declined. I would've been at their beck and call if they had a cell # for me, and would expect it doubly so if they had paid for the phone.

  81. Re:meaning of the word millenia by yagu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think you know what the word millenia means.

    Maybe, possibly. Or maybe you aren't familiar with, or are unable to recognize hyperbole.

    ;-)

  82. Blackberries creep the crap out of me by BASICman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    About 9 months ago I was about to be a college grad and was looking for work. I went down to CitiGroup in Manhattan to interview with one of their IT programs. While some of the work there sounded interesting, what really frightened me were the Blackberries.

    That is, we all were taken out to lunch. And while we're eating, our guides (CitiGroup employees already in the program) kept on checking their Blackberries. It was about then that I decided that any situation where my personal time was expected to be preempted by work without notice was not a situation I wanted to be in.

    --
    An enlightenment painter would paint a grand house on a lawn; A romantic painter would paint it on fire.
  83. Here is a revolutionary idea... by ComSon0 · · Score: 1

    Turn it off on weekends and other time when peace is more important.

    duh!

  84. Here's the deal... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I'm a software developer and have found that many companies dish out dingleberries as a way of getting people to work 24/7.
    And sure enough, there are schmucks that fall for it all the time because they think a blackberry makes them look important or whatever.
    We've all seen them, people outside of office hours that can't get off the damn blackberry. Pity them for their lack of priorities and probable lack of family home life.

    They seem to forget that you're in an equal business relationship with your employer. If your contract says they give you money for a certain amount of your time you should hold them to it because sure as anything, your employer will hold you to the bits you don't like.

    So basically, Blackberries only are fair if and only if your employer also gives you some extra flexibility for carrying one, such as allowing you to work from home during office hours, or making the hours more flexible.

    Otherwise come on people, be men not mice, turn the damn thing off when you're not on scheduled work hours, or better yet, refuse to carry one in the first place.

  85. Re:I'm available when I'm at work. Period. by sleazyrider · · Score: 1

    I have my own personal Blackberry. My immediate supervisor got my number and e-mail address from one of my co-workers and started calling and e-mailing me at home to ask stupid questions. I have him blocked now and personally "explained" to him that if he ever called me again at home, he better be ready to sign two hours overtime pay at a minimum. He knows it's either do it my way or find another body to replace me, because I'm already drawing one retirement check. ;) It's good to be able to do that, but some of you obviously cannot take that chance.

  86. You can always turn it off. by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

    The "power" button is always there for you to push...problem solved.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  87. Employees allow it because they feel they must... by superbus1929 · · Score: 1

    When it comes to Blackberrys, or even cell phones and webmail (our email is accesible through a webmail portal, and I have VPN access), I personally make everyone at my company stick to an on-call schedule; I am on call on X days, at X times, and don't call me otherwise. If someone makes a mistake, I'll help them, but at two, not only am I hanging up, but I'm making it a management issue at that point.

    But I'm exceptional in that I demand my personal space. I tell my employers that I do have a life outside of work, and I will adhere to it, and if they don't like it they can go forth and multiply. But even in my own company - where job security is pretty good - people have this fear that if they don't make themselves available 24/7 that they will be fired or otherwise replaced, after which they will end up homeless in the streets. I'm guessing at other companies parallel to what we do, it's worse, as it's implied that if someone can't be reached, OK, we'll find someone that can. Naturally, someone with a family can't afford to be unemployed, even for a small time, and there's so much fear of corporate overlords able to effectively end someone's career with a penstroke that they overcompensate, and make themselves effectively serfs. And at my first job in this industry - my first real job in the civilian world since getting out of the Navy - my boss at the time would see me working late all the time (something I do partially because I do personal stuff during my normal workday as I see fit; hence, why I'm on Slashdot during the work day), and he gave me sage advice: the more you give, the more they're going to expect, and it's going to be impossible to put the bar back down. He was right, and I'm seeing that elsewhere.

    Therefore, people that are given Crackberries from their jobs have a right to be worried, because companies aren't going to make that investment without expectation of a return. That return is going to be 100% availability, and frankly, if I was in that position, that's a concession that I'm not willing to make. The DIFFERENCE is that I'm not scared to look for another job, or tell the company to go forth if it came to that. A lot of people are.

    --
    Let's stop dilly-dallying and just change "-1: Overrated" to "-1: Disagree" or "-1: Doesn't Subscribe to Groupthink".
  88. You dont have to answer your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So no, if you can hit ignore, or simply let the phone ring, well you are doing it wrong.

    My work knows they have a 1/4 shot of getting a hold of me outside of work. 0/4 if it is before noon on a weekend.

  89. Boundaries are artificial by mardukvmbc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Work/life boundaries are artificial, anyway. I love my blackberry, and I only work 35-45 hours any given work week.

    Many, many people give me a hard time when they see me using/wearing it. Frequent comments are that I'm chained to it, that I can never leave work, etc. These couldn't be further from the truth: it's a liberation.

    It's just a tool. Like any other tool, the secret is in how you use it. Here's some benefits/advice:

          1. Forward your desk phone to it. Answer all email and phone calls using it. This way, everyone learns to expect a response from you using your blackberry. Now nobody knows where you are. You could be in a meeting, in your office, at the pub, or on the bus home. You now operate in stealth mode and have great freedom of movement and schedule.
          2. Days off become less stressful. If you're in a similar position than I am, taking time off is problematic. I frequently come back to more chaos and work after I take a day off, and it's very stressful worrying about what goes wrong when you're not there. No more. A glance at the 'berry and you can head problems off at the pass. I'd rather spend 30 seconds emailing a corrective note off than 4 hours fixing a problem that's reached upper management the next day.
          3. You can blend work and home life. Many people don't like this, but I do. Sometimes I come in late or leave early, if this means I have to spend a couple of hours on the weekend firing off a few emails when I have a clear head, so be it.
          4. Typically, you can use it for personal use, as long as you don't get out of hand. This means that you don't need to pay for a personal cell phone.
          5. It forces brevity. You don't want to write multiple page emails or have long conversations on the 'berry. Get you message crafted and out there in a short period of time.
          6. Google maps rock on a blackberry. Especially with the "location" feature, which doesn't need GPS.

    --
    "You disturb me to the point of insanity. There. I am insane now." - The Sprockets
  90. I For One.... by RobDude · · Score: 1

    Love that the Home/Work boundary is shattered.

    I'm a computer programmer; I enjoy writting code. I don't enjoy traffic or getting up early go even going to work, for the most part. It used to be that from 8-5 I *had* to be at my desk. That meant waking up early, sitting in traffic and generally being not too happy about it. That meant that on a Saturday when I actually felt like coding - I couldn't.

    Thanks to my cell-phone (that recieves my e-mails as text messages), VPN and call forwarding on my office phone when I'm at home I *am* at work. That means nobody cares where I am, as long as I'm not supposed to be in a meeting, as long as I'm doing work. I always put in 40 hours a week, but I'm a lot, lot, lot happier when I have the flexibility to sleep an extra two hours in the morning and put in a productive 8 hours instead of sitting at my desk all day trying not to fall asleep.

  91. Pay for play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a job where everyone had to wear a beeper on a rotation. The person wearing it got paid an hour extra every day and two hours minimum for coming in. They should work out something like that.

    A black berry will only contribute to work/life balance if I can work from home at will and only come in when I absolutely have too. Otherwise it will stay in an office filling cabinet off hours.

    Pay me one rate for availability and another for actual time at work. We can work out the rates before the occurrence.

    My present boss doesn't even get my cell phone number. That is real work/life balance.

  92. Blackberry is more intrusive, for some reason by vortigern00 · · Score: 1

    I've had a cell phone, pager capable of sending receiving email, cell phone capable of sending and receiving email and IMs or some sort of "leash" type telecommunications device for at least a decade, and I never felt any work pressure from these devices on my off time.

    Then about 6 months ago I got a blackberry. Something about that device changed (ruined) my personal life. I felt the intrusion of work like never before.

    Logic tells me it's just another email device. But there was something insidious about it, and I just can't manage to put my finger on what it was.

    I carried the thing for two weeks, and then returned it to the IT department. I could not tolerate the thing.

    Anybody have more of a clue than I do about what is so evil about these devices?

    -Vort

  93. Corporations are sociopaths by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't see how increasing employer culpability, and the environment of the worker was an undesirable, nor do I see how the opposite is in any way a good thing (unless you some sociopath only concerned with the bottom line, and not the stuff that matters). Publicly held corporations are sociopaths. The "stuff that matters" to a publicly held corporation is the bottom line. But publicly held corporations own the U.S. government. Can and should this change?
  94. The Sergeants Run the Army by natoochtoniket · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am the original techie (architect/engineer/developer/programmer/administrator/etc) in the company. Over 20+ years, the business has grown and gone public, and my systems have become the mission-critical part of the business. There really are some problems for which I am the only person in the world who knows the systems well enough to solve them. And, some of those problems are extremely expensive (per-minute) until they are solved. They pay me well enough that I don't mind a few extra hours occasionally, and a lot of extra hours very occasionally.

    A typical "emergency" ends up being most of a night to put the systems back online and stable, followed by a few days of follow up to fix the underlying issue, communicate what happened, and to coordinate who is going to do what to make the fix permanent. We had a bad month last September -- I ended up working 100+ hours/week for several weeks straight. That doesn't happen very often.

    To balance, I feel free to take some under-time, whenever I need it, or I judge it to be appropriate. My usual office schedule is probably about 35 hours a week, and much of that time is spent "walking around" (mentoring, tutoring, and a lot of listening).

    A few times over the years, a "senior management" type has fussed at me about my hours or schedules. None of those people work here any more. It's amazing how that happens. Some people think they can just issue orders. Others understand that they need to cooperate with the people who can actually make things happen. It doesn't take long to see the difference.

    The wise lieutenant understands that the senior sergeants actually run the army, do what they recommend, and don't piss them off. The life expectancy of a foolish lieutenant on the battleground is just a few days.

  95. Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've only had jobs in the modern sense for a short time. Historically speaking, jobs are a recent invention.
    In my opinion, their main purpose is to keep the rabble too busy to cause trouble to the ruling classes.

  96. Re:Shatter it? Of course it does, and to my benefi by Mr.Fork · · Score: 1

    The device for my staff is voluntary. If they have one, and I text them a msg and they reply, I really don't care where they are since I can get answers quickly - and they can send them back when they have time.

    By the sounds of this, you guys have a poision work environment. My staff have been empowered to make their own decisions - including the abiltiy to carry a cell phone, or a smart phone. The device is not mandatory. If your perception that this device is another chain on the employer prision - change your job becuase it sounds like you hate it. The device is just that - a device. How you view it, and how you use it, is completely within your power. Expecations? You set them. Not your employer. Don't blame the device - it's just a tool, no different than an office phone or a workstation.

    --
    Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. - Peter F. Drucker
  97. Constant Access by ioudas · · Score: 0

    Does Constant Access Shatter the Home/Work Boundary? Yes as an Access SQL programmer/Data Analyst, Access can shatter more than the Home/Work boundaries. It can shatter your soul.

    --
    http://www.cushingproductions.com
  98. employee benefits good; laws of eccon. better by EMB+Numbers · · Score: 1

    Everyone appreciates employee benefits, good working conditions, and balanced work/life relationships.

    However, some laws of economics seem to be as incontrovertible as laws of nature. Every attempt to avoid the laws of economics has resulted in economic disaster. Too many times, "Social Justice" is a euphemism for "unsustainable.".

    One very well establish law of economics is the law of supply and demand. If there is a demand, there will be a supply. If supply exceeds demand, prices will fall. If demand exceeds supply, prices will rise. Labor is not immune to the law of supply and demand, and historical efforts to distort this law through protectionist tariffs or artificial labor constraints or social justice programs have all failed.
    The only form of social justice that has ever worked is "equal opportunity" which in fact is the removal of artificial constraints. It has never been possible to assure equal outcome.

    Hate the laws if you want, but you can't change them.

    1. Re:employee benefits good; laws of eccon. better by darth_theta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One very well establish law of economics is the law of supply and demand. If there is a demand, there will be a supply. If supply exceeds demand, prices will fall. If demand exceeds supply, prices will rise.
      Markets are generally efficient in allocating resources and maximizing 'the size of the pie', especially under fantasy conditions (perfect information/competition), but when things get bad enough the supply may have no interest in observing the social conventions (property rights for example) that make the system possible. Unlike the market for most goods, the supply of labor consists of agents capable of starving, dying, stealing, waging war, etc. Thus market forces themselves can result in economic collapse and gross inefficiencies.
  99. How to retire very early? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Advice? Yes.

    1) Live **well** below your means - I was saving/investing over 30% of my gross income the last 10 years and always at least 20% since getting out of college. As much as I could were placed in tax advantaged accounts. I've lived (and continue to live) in fairly low cost of living parts of the country. Not California, DC, New York, although I suppose someone could make a bunch of money there then move to a lower cost place.

    2) Invest early and often in the stock market - automatic every month. I started in 1989 automatically with 15% of my salary going into the 401(k) plan at work + an extra 4% in taxable accounts. I've been using http://better-investing.org/ principles since 1991.
    Never take retirement money out of retirement accounts, always roll it over. Get at least 15% annual rate of return. I've done much better in recent years. I buy/sell stocks less than 10 times a year total across all accounts - no day trading here. I have less than 15 stock/company investments.

    3) Have fairly high paying jobs for 11+ years. I've never been very high in any company. Just a regular technical arch/software developer guy. I've had stock options that paid off in a small company when we were bought by a larger company. Think 10s of 1,000s, not $100,000+.

    4) Manage your debt. Don't have a car payment. Pay all credit cards off monthly. If you can't pay cash, don't get it. I haven't had a car payment since 1994.

    5) Don't have a mortgage longer than 15 years and pre-pay it. I was paying 3x the normal payment before paying off the house a few years ago. I paid off the mortgage in 6 years from when we moved in. No real estate investing happened.

    6) Don't have any kids. I have no idea how much my life would be different. College costs are up to them, just as it was for me. Kids don't appreciate things unless they have to save and pay for them themselves. I come from a large family with lots (20+) of nieces and nephews and I've seen what too much money does to kids. Kids need to poor, regardless of the parents finances. Spoiled kids come from lazy parents.

    7) Be charitable. I like the The Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation - http://www.pbtfus.org/ as my primary charity.

    8) Be healthy, but not stupid. Health problems and stupidity cause all sorts of expenses. Motorcycles = stupid. Sky diving = stupid. Bicycling in the country = healthy.

    More stuff is here: http://jdpfu.com/ - please don't slashdot me I have no bandwidth. Feel free to email if all the garbage there doesn't say enough. Tag = "investing"

    Also, "retired" is the same as "contract ended" to me.
    I may elect to work again, we'll see after 6 months or so off.

    Perhaps I need to enter the lucrative field (hah) of e-books and get people to send me $49.95 for my e-book on How to Retire Early and another $49.95 for How to Lose 100lbs of Weight in 6-8 Months?

  100. Firewall rules and email... by trevize42 · · Score: 1

    My company has firewall rules that block using email from yahoo, gmail, msn, etc etc. They also have some pretty strict rules about using wireless devices to access outside networks. Funny I have similar rule and policy on my home firewall that blocks work email. On the same token I doubt a blackberry would be allowed under "home" policy either. Such a device would "clearly be in contradiction to the required activities demanded of me at home". Oddly work has a similar rule that "any device that is in contradiction to your required job activities is not allowed". It's amazing how my work and home policies are so similar. Like they were written by the same lawyer or something. I've often told my manager that if the companies policy where to change that I'd talk to the admin of my home firewall and see if she'd do the same. It very hard for work to argue the point. After all it is their policy!

  101. Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My contact information usually begins with things like "Drive to the Stevens Lake trailhead", and usually ends with something like "I should be able to reach the office within 24 hours". If it's urgent enough that they'll send a runner after me, or foot the search-and-rescue bill, then it's urgent enough that I probably want to be in the office.

  102. This is about non-sysadmins by JasonEngel · · Score: 1

    Being a sysadmin (and I'd wager a significant portion of /.'s readership is also), this is a non-issue. I've been dealing with exactly this sort of thing for almost two decades. No big deal. I take it a step farther, in fact, because I work from home - work/life balance really gets weird by normal office jockey standards.

    The big deal here is that the people who are having their lives invaded (and that's what it is to them) by these little devices are the kinds of people who have never carried a pager, cell phone, or other communication device for anything work-related ever. For people like me, it's a part of how things are for me. For these folks it will be a radical change.

    Don't think for a minute that I am sympathetic toward them. Absolutely not. People like that have no clue about the daily extra effort IT folk put into their jobs, yet people like that have also been the least considerate when making demands of IT folk. Let them have a taste of what it's like to have dinner interrupted every evening, or to frequently get less than 4 hours of uninterrupted sleep, or to sacrifice time with loved ones because oncall duty interrupts it. I've got no problem with letting as many people as possible know what that's like.

    Yeah, I'm bitter, but also experienced. I've got no problem not answering the cell outside of my posted work hours unless previous arrangements have been made. The world never collapsed as a result of a missed call.

  103. Everyone's an Employee, Everyone's a Manager by severoon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is clearly an intractable problem that cannot be solved any other way. Blame the technology!

    Seriously, no piece of technology can be blamed for poor time management. Neither can one blame one's manager for allowing that person to manage your time poorly for you.

    This is an issue of ownership. Own your job, own your time, and take responsibility for yourself. If everyone's doing what they should be doing, then this discussion is moot. If everyone's not doing what they should be doing, then how about having that discussion instead of some hypothetical potential abuse you fear by those above you?

    My attitude toward my managers is this: if you're a good manager, then you're going to remove the obstacles I tell you are blocking me from doing my job. If you're not going to behave that way, then you're irrelevant to my core duties, and I'm going to invert our relationship. In other words, now I'm your manager, in the sense that I have to manage you as yet one more obstacle in my path to completing my tasks. If I do my job as your manager correctly, you'll trundle along happily and never know that I think of you as essentially a child out of your depth. If you become too much of a problem, I'll take me and my record of success somewhere else where I can work with adults.

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
  104. Retire Early? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have the right idea. Start early. I was 23.

    You have to have taxable investment accounts too. Sadly, I was unable to save as much as I wanted in tax advantaged accounts - i was always a W-2 employee, never a 1099 or corp-2-corp type, so $12K-15K was all I could save each year. Then add $4K/yr in IRA (or Roth-IRA) account. So, you're making $130k/yr and saving 30%, $45K. Only $19K is tax advantaged, so $26K goes into taxable accounts. Do that for 10 years - $260K+ returns (about $780K over 10 yrs) for taxable needs. Don't worry that the math isn't really right; the real number is $696K. It is close enough.

    Not having kids was the biggest help to my finances, I think. That and always beating market returns, sometimes by large amounts, really helped. In 2000-2001, I sold when everything dropped 20% and I'm not afraid to lock in a few gains as stock prices keep rising above what I consider "fair value". In short, when everyone else is selling, I'm probably buying stock when it is historically cheap. Don't get me wrong, I've had some 20% losers too. I'm not so proud that I can't admit a failure and sell at a loss. SBUX is my current loser. I bought in June, July and August - I thought it was cheap all those times (I buy 1/3rd at a time). Seems I was wrong. I'll be selling it on the next up day to get the IRS to help with my loses (offset gains) and I might buy it back in 32 days when it is even cheaper if the fundamentals hold up. This is the difference between owing $2+K at tax time and getting $2+K back this year. BTW, I try to always owe money.

  105. customers, employers, service... by Brother+Fade · · Score: 1

    On balance, the Blackberry helps me, it doesn't burden me. For me at least, a Product Manager working from a home office, my employer is generally not the demanding entity. It's my customers (independent distributor/manufacturer's reps), and their customers (building owners, design/build engineering companies). It's a global economy out there, and they can chose to go to someone else. All too often, somebody decides they need a bid on my products just before some deadline. Yeah, they're knuckleheads for not requesting a bid earlier. But, the issue isn't who left it to the last minute, since it happens all the time and I cannot influence proactive/responsible behavior in people several links removed from me. The issue is, if I have the energy, and it doesn't impact family plans, then I can chose to respond. Voila, superior service. Without the Blackberry, I would not have had the option. If I chose not to reply, well, they sent the request after hours (my hours, not necessarily theirs). Not to mention being able to move work requests along while travelling, running errands, etc. For my situation, the Blackberry enlarges freedom, it does not decrease personal time.

  106. Problems for hourly workers by dave562 · · Score: 1

    My current employer had to implement a policy restricting access to web mail (Outlook Web Access) so that only salaried employees could use it. Like just about every other HR based decision it came after the company got sued. An employee wanted all sorts of back pay for "working from home" even though her boss didn't ask her to.

  107. All well and good, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last part of your comment, regarding working from the bar, can lead to BIG problems which mean more work tomorow. Trust me, I know.

  108. Weasel words: 'can contribute' by darkonc · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is fine for a sysadmin who is coming in and negotiating a new contract.

    It's different for salaried staff who are on an existing contract. They can get the worst of both worlds:

    On one hand, they get handed the crackberry and expected to respond to it on lunch, breaks and after hours.

    on the other hand, it can be 2-4 years before the next round of contract talks which would deal with this change -- and, even then, the crackberry issue (if it's only one, small department affected) could just fall off the negotiating table due to time constraints, or whatever.


    I'd say that it's fine for senior management who are expected to work overtime, handle issues when home or even on vacation and then factor that in to things like the time that they take off.


    On the other hand, it really does need to be properly negotiated, beforehand, for middle and lower tiers who don't have the kinds of freedom that upper management have.


    As the exec said: it can lead to things like telecomuting, etc. etc. etc. ... but it can also lead to extended hours with no payback. I have no access to the department in question, but I'm going to assume that, if the workers raised enough of a fuss about it to have the project shelved, they probably have some fear that they were going to end up in something more akin to the latter situation.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    1. Re:Weasel words: 'can contribute' by Moofie · · Score: 1

      If your contract doesn't include a requirement to be on call 24/7, what's the problem? Does your contract say "These portions of your contract will be voided, in such a way that you won't be allowed to renegotiate, if we hand you a piece of personal electronic equipment."? If it does, I suggest that you were not very smart when you signed that contract.

      If you're subject to an unacceptable expectation, reset the expectation. "If you want me to be on call, you need to give me more money. If not, that's fine too."

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  109. My blackberry has been turned off for 6 months by apparently · · Score: 1

    and those dumb fuckers sure haven't noticed.

    The notion that employees need to be available at all hours is horseshit that deserves to be eaten by anyone weak enough to buy into it.

  110. Speaking of constant access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have constant access to pr0n and it doesn't mean that I am forced to spend my free time masturba... err... never mind!

  111. A non-IT Perspective by greatcelerystalk · · Score: 1

    I work in Residence Life and Housing at a large-ish university. I don't have an on-call rotation at the moment, but the nature of my job dictates that I should be available for major issues or crises 24/7, unless I'm on vacation. I also have a WM5-based smartphone with Direct Push enabled.

    The student and professional staff know that they can e-mail my university address during business hours (8AM-5PM) and they will generally receive a prompt response. I have my phone set to synch items as they arrive up until 8PM, which isn't something I tell the staff members, but just in case something urgent comes up and it's sent via e-mail (which is a rarity, urgent issues are handled by phone or in person contact), I'm still aware of it.

    After 8PM, I don't check my university mail.

    The few staff members who have my mobile number or my home number know to call after hours only if an urgent situation arises.

    I used to tell my staff just to e-mail me or text me because it would synch with my phone 24/7. They were more likely to e-mail or text with minor issues they were able to handle themselves or that the on-duty staff member was supposed to handle than they do now. Having to actually speak with me has limited the number of issues I'm contacted about.

    If your boss or co-workers are e-mailing you constantly try doing something similar... either turn off push email or adopt a voice call only policy.

  112. on call 24/7 by lordsid · · Score: 1

    Technically I'm on call 24/7, but:

    I'm third man on the list, and I receive a pretty decent cash bonus if they call me at home.

    This is good enough for me. I don't really carry a cellphone, but my gf and I share one. Work doesn't interfere in my life that much . So I find this to be a reasonable arrangement.

    Would I take an iPhone if work was offering it? Hell, yeah. Blackberry? I would have to think about it.

    --
    IMAGE VERIFICATION IS EVIL!
  113. Re:Shatter it? Of course it does, and to my benefi by mollymoo · · Score: 1

    Wow, you can extrapolate a hell of a lot from zero data. When did I mention anything at all about my work environment? I was just curious about whether your obvious enthusiasm for breaking the work/life boundary (which isn't inherent to a device, of course) extended to your staff's work/life boundaries too.

    As you seem so curious though: I have a smartphone of my own (more for fast data rather than email etc. on the device itself - tiny screens suck, my Nokia 770 is much nicer), which work can and do use to contact me, and that's fine by me. They only contact me outside work hours if it really can't wait. That's pretty rare and is usually a change in where I'll be working the next day or the offer of an extra days work (at overtime rates, of course) to cover for someone. If I don't find out till it's the next day and I'm already at the wrong site that's no big problem, so I can turn my phone off if I want to and there will be no repercussions. I do have one issue with my work's use of SMS though - my boss quite regularly uses txtspk. Ewww. I'm sure with T9 it's actually slower to type than proper English.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  114. Blackberry decreased my work time. by superchi · · Score: 1

    Getting a Blackberry decreased time I spent "at work" and improved my personal life.

    My Blackberry is set up so it only beeps if the CEO sends me something, and it vibrates and the LED flashes only when something is sent directly to me. It takes me only a couple of minutes to respond to something that could save someone else hours of time (especially at our offshore Vietnam office), and if it takes more than a few minutes, it must be something important that I should be told, anyway.

    That's in contrast to how it was before when I had my laptop on the dinner table and sometimes the bedroom. I had to check it just to see if there was something urgent (which could take several minutes), whereas now it takes me a few seconds to look at my Blackberry for the red flashing LED.

    It automatically shuts off during my normal sleeping hours. It's also my alarm clock, and it's actually good to start the day by reading my e-mail so I know what kind of fires I need to put out when I reach the office.

    In addition, it reminds me of Outlook appointments, I can surf the web, instant message, and even update my Facebook.

    I would encourage managers to get a Blackberry and can even encourage superiors to justify the purchase as "cheap overtime" when really it should save you time if you're already staying extra hours at the office or you're already taking work home with you. I got the Blackberry 8830 model (with GPS) from Sprint, and it's great.

  115. Boundary? What boundary? by Chas · · Score: 1

    Seriously, there's a boundary around here somewhere?

    Whoops! My 30 second "take a breath" moment is up. Back to the grind! Only another 30 years of this and I can have a whole minute of time to myself!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  116. Shocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really shocked at these comments. Everyone feels they are entitled to closing up shop after 40 hours - or being compensated for it.

    Try working a little harder, being a little more flexible, maybe you'll get somewhere with your career. The 40 hours for a crummy salary is a self-fuffilling prophecy. I've always worked 50-60 hours a week, whether its in a shitty or now a rewarding job. It's not always fun and you are always making less then you feel you deserve. But all that hard work pays off, you too might be one of those executives one day.

    Or continue bitching, I'll laugh as I pass you on the ladder.

  117. Work ethic by SilverPDA · · Score: 1

    I may be old fashioned but I question the professionalism of anyone that avoids efficiency from technology because they are concerned more productivity might be expected.

    --
    Thank a veteran -- George
  118. I am salaried.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... not a serf.

    If my company says jump from a cliff I would not.

    Same applies to many things. It is not like they are god or something like that.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  119. Don't have that option? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Sorry, where you sold in auction with a broom, a donkey and a pair of potato sacks? Did your owner checked your teeth???

    Jeez...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  120. Since when geeks need to ask .... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... where the fuck is the off button?

    Honestly guys ....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  121. Integrators and Seperators by mark99 · · Score: 1

    This has been discussed here many times before. There are integrators and seperators.

    Figure out who you are and structure your life accordingly. I am an integrator, and me and my family have few problems with this. Vacations are occasionally problematic - but we deal with it :)

  122. It's more of a cultural thing. by consultant · · Score: 1

    I can't comment on Australia (where the article was written) but having worked in the USA and Europe I can say for certain that it's more of a cultural difference and that Blackberries, etc. are just another tool to enhance those differences. I'll explain a bit further.

    It's very bizarre, that a the EU which is far more socialist, has a more capitalistic (in the true sense of the word not the warped media definition) than the USA does. In Europe, everyone works with a contract of employment (just like the contracts used in business every day) which state that the employee, will work X hours for Y dollars per hour/week/year and receive Z days vacation. Because it's a legally binding contract the employee doesn't expect an extra $1,000 dollars to magically appear in his pay packet at the end of the month, and the employer doesn't (by EU law) expect or force anyone to put in an extra 20/30/40 hours of work each week, if they choose to, then great, it's their choice, but they have to let the employer know.

    On the contrary in the USA there are "At Will Employment" which dictates that the person has no guidelines as to how many hours to work, and in order to get ahead in your job often means that you have to work harder than your peers, often meaning you have to take work home, and work an extra "N" hours a week in order to get noticed, once you set that standard and everyone is doing the same, you open the door to a situation where anyone that doesn't do so, can potentially be disciplined. Because there is no black and white contract to guide either side, it's down to who has the biggest cahonies, the employee to say screw you, my family comes first or the employer to say you're not pulling your weight, get out of here.

    So, using that assumption, many Europeans have Blackberry's and other mobile devices, and have for sometime, as to whether the they get used in anger during downtime or family time is more about whether the employee has a "capitalist contract" clearly defining what either side is able to do, or whether they have an at will employer of which they live in fear of, because they can't afford to lose their job/healthcare/pension/dental, etc.

    Anyone who's in a position where taking vacation (or genuine sick days) may mean that they get passed over for a promotion/raise/job is bound to blur the work/life boundaries, the tools with which you make that blur happen are inconsequential, mobile computing simply made it easier to do so for those that were already doing it. Just my 52 cents

  123. Where do you work? by Geekbot · · Score: 1

    You'll get dozens if different answers here because everyone has a different situation. I work somewhere now where it's cool if I have to leave early because my kid is sick. So it's also cool with me if an hour or two after work they call me because they have some problem they need help with.

    I used to work a part time 20 hour job where they wanted 40 hours of work and on call. That was not OK because if they wanted 40 hours they needed to pay me for it. So I wasn't available when they called.

    Comes down to if your bosses are trustworthy for how they use your time and if you can afford to walk away if they are not.

  124. Re:Shatter it? Of course it does, and to my benefi by Mr.Fork · · Score: 1

    Mollymoo said: "Wow, you can extrapolate a hell of a lot from zero data."

    It's what I do for a living - climb that assumption ladder right to the top. :)

    Valid points MM. I am looking through this issue with smoked lenses - as a manager and it is refreshing to see an alternative perspective. Sorry to hear that your boss txtspk's with the 'ewww' factor attached. Maybe you could just l33t-spk back to him? Could get him to stop txting you. :P

    --
    Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. - Peter F. Drucker