Slashdot Mirror


China Vows to Stop the Rain

Since the Olympic stadium doesn't have a roof, the Beijing Meteorological Bureau has been given the task of making sure the games remain dry. According to Zhang Qian, head of weather manipulation (best title to have on a business card ever) at the bureau, they've had success with light rain but heavy rain remains tough to control. I see a hurricane cannon in some lucky country's future.

214 comments

  1. I can just imagine by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Interesting

    what the post-opening propaganda will be like if that day turns out to have sunny blue skies...

    1. Re:I can just imagine by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. With all the dust storms they get when there's no rain, they best they can hope for is that the east will be red.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    2. Re:I can just imagine by dwater · · Score: 1

      don't get many dust storms here (bj), nor rain for that matter - well, it's not like it happens every day or anything...but they tend to be serious when they do happen.

      --
      Max.
    3. Re:I can just imagine by mpe · · Score: 1

      what the post-opening propaganda will be like if that day turns out to have sunny blue skies...

      Especially if the trains are running on time too.

    4. Re:I can just imagine by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      I have friends in Beijing, and from what I hear, we can pretty much be guaranteed the skies will not be blue.

      However, they are apparently planning to limit driving, shut down the coal plants, etc. for the olympics, so we'll see, huh?

  2. Someone tell John Fogerty? by Fysiks+Wurks · · Score: 5, Funny

    He always wanted to know "who'll stop the rain?" The Chinese.

    --
    P226
    1. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by croddy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Really? Have you ever seen the rain?

    2. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      I haven't, but I certainly wouldn't want to be in the rain that falls down in China.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    3. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1

      But today is a Sunny Day...

      --
      We are the Borg...
    4. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      >Really? Have you ever seen the rain?


      Comin' down on a sunny day?

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    5. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by teslar · · Score: 1

      Raindrops keep falling on my head....

      But it can't rain all the time!

    6. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      Really? Have you ever seen the rain? I've seen November Rain.
    7. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Indeed. It's a fine day. People open windows. They leave the houses just for a short walk.

      --
      It's times like this I wish I had a friend named 'The Professor'.
    8. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      But it's "raining men, hallelujah", how are they going to stop that?

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    9. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by The+Jonas · · Score: 1

      I've seen November Rain.
      Is November rain Purple or Chocolate ?
    10. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by ronadams · · Score: 1

      Thanks Miss Jane.
      On-Topic: Controlling the weather has an automatic captcha of whatcouldpossiblygowrong

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    11. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outside my front door?

    12. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by mybadluck22 · · Score: 1

      I don't think you know what a captcha is. whatcouldpossiblygowrong is a tag. A captcha is the thing you type in to let slashdot know that you're not a robot.

      --
      If I could rearrange the keyboard, I'd put U and I together.
    13. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by ronadams · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    14. Re:Someone tell John Fogerty? by coopaq · · Score: 1
      I doubt he really cares. Long as 'he' Can See the Light.

      But he doesn't want to be Walking In A Hurricane.

  3. Action/Reaction? by snl2587 · · Score: 1

    So they can control the rain. But where does all of that energy go?

    1. Re:Action/Reaction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      They don't actually *stop* the rain. It's most likely cloud seeding and similar... removing all the water from the clouds by making it fall early one way or another. Now, large scale weather manipulation is bad... but a few weeks in one city isn't going to hurt anything. Yea yea, butterfly effect and all... but also dynamic equilibrium.

    2. Re:Action/Reaction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea yea, butterfly effect and all... but also dynamic equilibrium.

      Funny, no one on /. was saying that about this
    3. Re:Action/Reaction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they could just make the rain fall on the fields before entering city, that would be even good

  4. What in the hell? by LordKaT · · Score: 4, Informative

    Am I the only one seeing this retarded mess of a theme on idle.*?

    1. Re:What in the hell? by mugnyte · · Score: 1


        no. i'm seeing it as well. caught me off-guard, but i'm waiting to see if its a fluke or a permanent change.

    2. Re:What in the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this definately renders improperly on IE6 (I'm at school, so don't yell).

    3. Re:What in the hell? by Lulfas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's ugly and weird and scary :(

    4. Re:What in the hell? by PJ1216 · · Score: 1

      doesn't render properly on firefox 2.0 either

    5. Re:What in the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sosyourface! :D *ZING* I kid, I kid...but seriously.

    6. Re:What in the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      doesn't render properly on firefox 2.0 either
      Your mom doesn't render properly in Firefox 2.0 EITHER!

      OH SNAP!
    7. Re:What in the hell? by croddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      holy hell man this is the ugliest theme i have ever seen. make it stop!!!

    8. Re:What in the hell? by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      I like some of it. The overall slimness is nice, since I like fitting more on the screen. But it needs some tweaking for sure.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    9. Re:What in the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly my thoughts. First the retarded comment system, now this. Looks like Sourceforge Inc is desperately trying to save on server costs by losing visitors.

    10. Re:What in the hell? by orclevegam · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, my first reaction was "WTF!?!?" so I went and checked some other articles to see if it was a new site design or something, but it looks like it's just this article.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    11. Re:What in the hell? by Thelasko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eyes... Burning...Must... Make it stop!
      *smashes monitor*

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    12. Re:What in the hell? by ajs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's pretty broken. My guess is it's a just a bug. From the comments of previous posters it seems like it's universally sucking in all browsers, so it's not just a case of having tested with the wrong browser.

    13. Re:What in the hell? by techpawn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I know it's off topic, but... my reaction was to check if it was me or the site. I mean, who would put changes in without the users knowledge? It's not too bad, still scared the buddy Christ right out of me.

      --
      Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    14. Re:What in the hell? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I think it's much nicer if you have the low-bandwith (or something) version, I don't see half the stuff that is showing in a screenshot elsewhere in the comments.

      Having said that, the "Post Comment" form is now about 1/6th the width of my (wide) screen and on the far left, so that needs fixing.

    15. Re:What in the hell? by chebucto · · Score: 1

      I agree with the above, and also like the lack of left-hand sidebar for the same reason - it saves space. I've never used the category- and other site- links in that sidebar, anyway.

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    16. Re:What in the hell? by Cerberus7 · · Score: 1

      Since this is apparently the "bitch about the layout" thread...

      The topic icons look like ass with a non-white background.

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    17. Re:What in the hell? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      My first reaction was to check to see if I'd clicked on the right link -- I thought somebody'd slipped a link to a Slashdot parody into the article.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    18. Re:What in the hell? by booleanoperator · · Score: 1

      it looks pretty cool and works nicely in firefox3 (b2)

    19. Re:What in the hell? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      It's definitely strange and bizarre, but I don't see anything actually broken in Konqueror. Haven't tried in anything else, though.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    20. Re:What in the hell? by crymeph0 · · Score: 1

      No, it's all of idle.slashdot.org.

      --
      It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.
    21. Re:What in the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But she looked just fine on my Safari last night!!!

    22. Re:What in the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, I kind of like this layout...it leaves a lot of space for the commenting. But, even if I think it's moving in the right direction, this arrangement is still too buggy for us to be seeing it now.

    23. Re:What in the hell? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      It's nostalgic. It really shows off the impressive one-bit transparency of the category icons. That combined with bad usability and weird positioning everywhere really makes me feel like it's 1998.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    24. Re:What in the hell? by jez9999 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must be new to Slashdot. You know how most site developers have a local copy of the site that they test on and then sync to the main site when they're finished? With Slashdot, that's the main site.

    25. Re:What in the hell? by stg · · Score: 1

      It does save a lot of space on the left, but it looks really weird on a widescreen monitor...

    26. Re:What in the hell? by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1
      This live updating stuff is a PITA. Maybe I'll get used to it, but I can't seem to read the threads, it's laggy, Middle clicking doesn't work. How can I get the old slashdot back?

      opera on winxp.

    27. Re:What in the hell? by AmaDaden · · Score: 1

      After looking at that page I'm getting the feeling that the Idle section is going to get more and more Diggish. So my question is did someone at Slashdot HQ hit commit early or is this the finished product?

    28. Re:What in the hell? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I've been watching it slowly evolve. I think it is supposed to have an unpolished feel, though I liked the variation of the Slashdot logo with the peeling "t" better.

      This is though the first Idle story I've seen on the front page!

      Now if I could only get the Firehose to default to listing all submissions like it used to by default instead of only stories. ?fhfilter= treats the empty value as equivalent to ?fhfilter=story. (I also use &color=indigo as undetermined parts of my client-side stylesheet prevent the proper positioning of the color slider, and clicking the highlight color of a story has stopped working for me.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    29. Re:What in the hell? by AmaDaden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah. They were clearly designed to be on a white background. If the background of the actual story was white I would not have a problem with this layout it. Well besides the initial "What happened to my Slashdot!" factor and a few small size issues.

    30. Re:What in the hell? by RRotorcraft · · Score: 1

      What exactly is everyone seeing? Looks fine on my machine. Solaris/CDE

    31. Re:What in the hell? by realthing02 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This really changes the idea of "Big Game Hunting" doesn't it.

    32. Re:What in the hell? by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      No, they're trying to compete with digg by adding more fluff.

      Also, if I could, I'd digg you. (I lost all my modpoints long ago through meta-moderation, because I kept modding up trolls.)

    33. Re:What in the hell? by christurkel · · Score: 1

      First OSnews.com and now this. What, is there a contest for ugliest geek website going on?

      --

      CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    34. Re:What in the hell? by u38cg · · Score: 1
      There is a good reason for not having ridiculously wide columns on a screen - humans can only comfortably read 60-70 characters on a single line before they get lost. There is a reason no news site on earth presents stories in a full screen width.

      And this layout sucks. Meh.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    35. Re:What in the hell? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      What *is* idle.*?

      It must be new, because I don't see it under the "customize styles" options in the Slashdotter extension.

      Even more annoying, because this is the first time I wanted to use that function!

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    36. Re:What in the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      well this is a nice pile of crap the slash guys have created "idle"

    37. Re:What in the hell? by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1
      Put me down as another who falls in the "WTF?" category. This is also my first time seeing an idle story on the front page. Here are my thoughts on them: 1)I like the idea of adding idle.slashdot stories to the front page. It's a department that frankly I am ashamed to admit I didn't realize existed.

      2) I'd rather not see NSFW stories period. When I want to see those, there is a plethora of links bookmarked on my home machine. Just about every workplace has a code of conduct regarding personal computer use. A lot allow changing the homepage to something of personal interest, but only as long as there is nothing objectionable in the content. Sure, the NSFW tag makes sure I don't launch some loud obscene video where my co-workers can overhear, but I'm very reluctant to trust to tagging as a way to decide what to click. Also, even if I don't click the NSFW links, the mere fact that NSFW material is available here is enough to render it bannable on my school and work computers. Thankfully no one has looked at the logs, then checked out the site thoroughly enough to find that such material is here and then give me grief about it (yet).

      3) I really don't like the new format for idle.slashdot. I will admit that I took a _long_ time to get used to every new look that slashdot has adopted. However, one thing has remained more or less consistent is that the layout echoed the green and white bar tractor feed paper I grew up using. I _like_ that look. It calls to mind indestructible line printers, small monochrome monitors and hard drives the size of filing cabinets* The new look for idle.slashdot now resembles some upstart blog with a truly horrible taste in colour scheme.

      4) That said, I do like the treatment of the slashdot logo. I do like the idea of changing the logo slightly for different departments and for certain (geek related) holidays.

      * The first hard drive I ever saw was the size of two 3 drawer file cabinets, the second about the size of a bankers box and the third was a 5.25" model with a whopping 4GB if memory serves correctly.

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    38. Re:What in the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something that size should really be in the Opera.

    39. Re:What in the hell? by Evangelion · · Score: 1

      > I mean, who would put changes in without the users knowledge?

      Uhh, slashdot? You must be new here.

    40. Re:What in the hell? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      So narrow your browser window. It really annoys me when sites decide in advance how much text I should see on a line. The web should be viewable on a wide range of devices, from old 14" monitors with 800x600 resultion and large fonts, to 24" monitors with amazing resolution, to people browsing on their iPhones.

      Deciding to uselessly throw away horizontal space in advance is wrong.

    41. Re:What in the hell? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      How can I get the old slashdot back?

      Have you tried Preferences -> Comments -> Discussion Style -> Classic Discussion System?

    42. Re:What in the hell? by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot, sanity is now restored.

    43. Re:What in the hell? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Welcome :)

    44. Re:What in the hell? by tehBoris · · Score: 1

      Come on! It doesn't look so bad!

      I find that it looks rather clean, and for some reason I don't see interpost-ad breakage everywhere they're blocked. I hope they did something about the problem of responses to down modded posts (they looked as if they were responses to other posts above)

      I, for one, welcome our new errr... /. layout things overlords.

  5. Operation weather disaster by elyk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Any of you ever played that game? This reminds me of a quote by the evil genius: "Everyone talks about the weather, but nobody ever does anything about the weather. Well, I'm going to do something about it".

    --
    MS-DOS: Most Severe Denial of Service
    Free Online Backup
    1. Re:Operation weather disaster by kzg · · Score: 1

      I remember this game. It was put out by the discovery channel just as CD-ROMs were starting to be included with computers. It was quite fun.

  6. Rain's better than smog by randyest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think I'd prefer to get wet or use an umbrella than breathe the horrible smog that blankets Beijing. In fact, the rain is often the only thing that reduces the smog and air pollution for a shirt while.

    NPR had a story about how they're forcing 1/3 of the cars to stay off the road and shutting down a bunch of factories to try to reduce the air pollution for the olympics. Maybe just letting (or making) it rain, instead of stopping it from raining, would do even more good.

    --
    everything in moderation
    1. Re:Rain's better than smog by powerlord · · Score: 1

      The other one I heard is how olympic athletes were debating practicing in high Smog areas so they would be better prepared for the conditions. :)

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    2. Re:Rain's better than smog by DataBroker · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think I'd prefer to get wet or use an umbrella than breathe the horrible smog [guardian.co.uk] that blankets Beijing. In fact, the rain is often the only thing that reduces the smog and air pollution for a shirt while.
      Wired actually had an article, Smog and Mirrors, about this exact same thing. They actually wrote the opposite of TFA:

      And there's always the Hail Mary play: cloud seeding. Should air quality threaten to steal the show, the Beijing Meteorological Bureau promises to have its fleet of cloud-seeding aircraft warmed up on the runways, ready to bomb the sky with silver iodide and set off air-scrubbing showers over competition areas.
    3. Re:Rain's better than smog by randyest · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great idea. They should probably all take up smoking too. That way they can build up a protective layer of soot in their lungs prior to the olympics; that's sure to help their athletic performance.

      --
      everything in moderation
    4. Re:Rain's better than smog by randyest · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That sure seems more reasonable. But what would make the most sense, to me, would be to have used some of that cheap labor to build some indoor stadiums and HEPA air filters. I mean, who wants to sit for hours outside breathing air that, on most days, is considered "very dangerous to breathe," raining or not?

      --
      everything in moderation
    5. Re:Rain's better than smog by jellie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In a strange (?) coincidence, China is experiencing blizzards that have severely hindered their railway system due to the difficulties of shipping coal. It might not be that bad come summer time, but who knows. It might help them realize that their dependence on coal is infeasible. And maybe the US should take heed.

    6. Re:Rain's better than smog by TheGavster · · Score: 2, Informative

      What sort of energy supply *isn't* affected by a blizzard? Anything that uses fuel relies on transportation links, and everything else relies on geography. Blizzards take down the thousand-mile power lines that get wind and solar to cities just as easily as they take down a train. I would say that shipping coal across a country is actually probably *better* than shipping oil halfway around the world.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    7. Re:Rain's better than smog by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The US railroad industry has been dealing with blizzards for more than a century - they have very few (if any) problems. There's nothing for them to 'take heed' of.

    8. Re:Rain's better than smog by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Three words:
      Personal Nuclear Reactors

    9. Re:Rain's better than smog by jellie · · Score: 1

      That was mostly in reference to burning coal, as China has been accelerating its production of coal power plants - and this will make its smog problem even worse. Its energy supply, like in this case, would be severely affected by disasters. I was also saying that the US should take heed of its own dependence upon coal or any one source of energy (I do realize that coal is a smaller percentage of the energy in the US than in China). Yeah, my post was confusing.

    10. Re:Rain's better than smog by Trogre · · Score: 1

      If the problem is as bad as people are claiming, it sounds like they'd be better off keeping those cars off the road, and the factories closed well after the games have ended.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    11. Re:Rain's better than smog by MorePower · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard of blizzards disrupting natural gas (which makes much of our electricity here in California). Natural gas is generally "shipped" long distance in big underground pipes.

    12. Re:Rain's better than smog by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      China doesn't have the same level of pollution controls as the US does - which is why they have the smog problems.

  7. Correction: What in Hannah's Hellish Handbag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, we see it, too.

  8. i see by yincrash · · Score: 1

    So that explains the snow...

    1. Re:i see by u8i9o0 · · Score: 1

      So that explains the snow...
      Do you mean that the recent record snowfall was intentional?
      You know, that actually would explain the apologies from party leaders.

      Seems to be a lot of water supply problems in China, lately.
      --
      This is not my sig
  9. Isn't Zhang Qian the same guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...who used to sell earthquake pills to Wile E. Coyote?

  10. Cloud seeding and cloud freezing? by KublaiKhan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not exactly 'new' tech...the silver iodide version's been around forever, and the liquid nitrogen version doesn't sound particularly revolutionary.

    It does, however, go along with the Chinese cultural desire to control the elements, which heretofore has been embodied mostly with the rivers--the legendary "Yellow Emperor" was the first to stop the flooding of the Yang Tze; the current government has thrown massive resources into the Three Gorges dam. Controlling the rivers has been traditionally (as far as I recall, anyway) seen as evidence of controlling the land, and thus of being a legitimate government.

    Controlling the rain, then, would be an extension of this.

    --
    In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
    A stately pleasure dome decree
    1. Re:Cloud seeding and cloud freezing? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Controlling the people has been traditionally (as far as I recall, anyway) seen as evidence of controlling the land, and thus of being a legitimate government. Fixed that for you.
      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    2. Re:Cloud seeding and cloud freezing? by KublaiKhan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Controlling the water means you control the people, as well--remember, China has been, traditionally, a largely agricultural country, dependent upon a certain flood cycle.

      If you control the rivers, you control the land they feed and drain. If you control the feeding and draining, you control the people who need that feeding and draining to survive, and to grow food. If you control the people who grow food, you control the people who need food--and that's more or less everyone.

      It all comes back to the water.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    3. Re:Cloud seeding and cloud freezing? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Controlling the rivers has been traditionally (as far as I recall, anyway) seen as evidence of controlling the land, and thus of being a legitimate government
      Well, as far as I've read, vicious floods or droughts were seen as signs of disfavor from the powers-that-be.

      So lack of floods or droughts is a sign of divine favor. Regardless of what good works an empire can achieve, a few years of horrible floods leads to revolution (or coup with popular support).

      Of course, one could say that the real issue is the government's lack of response to the flooding/drought etc, or the lack of preparation for the same -- but typically the superstitious logic sells the best when trying to organize popular sentiment against the people in power. Or so I've read -- but who knows how accurate some of the "histories" I've read were.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Cloud seeding and cloud freezing? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Three Gorges has a large practical reason to exist -- irrigation. It makes power , as a side effect, because it would be silly not to.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Cloud seeding and cloud freezing? by LittleStone · · Score: 1

      It does, however, go along with the Chinese cultural desire to control the elements, which heretofore has been embodied mostly with the rivers--the legendary "Yellow Emperor" was the first to stop the flooding of the Yang Tze; the current government has thrown massive resources into the Three Gorges dam. Controlling the rivers has been traditionally (as far as I recall, anyway) seen as evidence of controlling the land, and thus of being a legitimate government.
      Using that ancient example to imply Chinese's cultural desire is a stretch. There were no advance warning system to evacuate people living by the river. Even if they know that half day in advance, it was extremely difficult to evacuate. Flood prevention was more cost effective and practical. But that's the ancient time.
      --
      A sig is redundant.
    6. Re:Cloud seeding and cloud freezing? by edisrafeht · · Score: 1

      The Yellow Emperor's claim to fame was not taming the Yang Tze but the Yellow River. These are ancient northerners, afterall.

    7. Re:Cloud seeding and cloud freezing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what they really need is a floating island with an adamant base. Then if they want to stop the rain they could hover the island over the area thus blocking the rain. If people get really rebellious to where this tactic won't work, you can then just lower the island onto the cities crushing their homes and their families.

  11. Let the dissidents out... by mi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Rather than worry about the weather, China should release everyone arrested for "inciting subversion of state power", and remove the charge from its criminal law.

    Until then, the athletes should boycott the country...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  12. I know how it is going to work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Chinese military transport aircraft will take off from Beijing loaded with kids and gigantic loudspeakers. You will hear chants of "Rain, Rain, Go Away, Come Back Again Another Day".

    1. Re:I know how it is going to work... by sethstorm · · Score: 4, Funny

      How would they pay off the various goldfarming shops that employ them?

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  13. In other news by The+Redster! · · Score: 1

    Bush threatened China with force in an emergency press conference on Thursday, demanding the extradition of terrorist leader Cobra Commander.

    1. Re:In other news by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Cobra Commander was a Pawn, Serpentor and Destro were the *real* leaders :-P

  14. Now if this was on human rights... by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    I highly doubt it - they're more likely to be able to get human rights (and not by some economist's perversion of it) improved to US/Canada/EU levels.

    I (and a non-ignorable amount of others) will boycott these Olympics.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Now if this was on human rights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your boycott will be ignored.

    2. Re:Now if this was on human rights... by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      awe. poor pity.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    3. Re:Now if this was on human rights... by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      That's it, now that you are boycotting the Olympics, they will surely cancel them.

      Yet another example of the Chinese government caving in to the pressure from a random slashdotter

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    4. Re:Now if this was on human rights... by sricetx · · Score: 1

      I too will boycott the Olympic games in Red China.


      China should be given the cold shoulder by western nations until they improve their human rights record. Unfortunately at least in the USA, our corrupt politicians and business leaders seem to want to emulate China rather than prod them to improve the human rights situation.


      Oh, and we should take a stand and recognize democratic Taiwan as a completely independent sovereign nation too. Admit them to the UN, etc.
    5. Re:Now if this was on human rights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with their attitudes towards human rights.

      But on the other topic of controlling the weather? Fucking awesome. We (humans) rock.

    6. Re:Now if this was on human rights... by sethstorm · · Score: 1
      I highly doubt it.

      An Olympic boycott was imposed against South Africa by the IOC itself in 1964 because of apartheid; it worked. In 1980, the US and 60 other countries boycotted the Moscow Olympics because of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan; within three years the USSR was crumbling.

      Those who argue against boycotts say that "being there" matters more: I disagree, it just gives comfort to tyrants.

      In 1987, President Reagan bluntly told the South Korean junta that, unless it brought in democracy, the US would boycott the 1988 Seoul Olympics: democracy was introduced. Source: Edward McMillan-Scott, the Yorkshire Post, UK, 18 January 2008.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    7. Re:Now if this was on human rights... by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and we should take a stand and recognize democratic Taiwan as a completely independent sovereign nation too. Admit them to the UN, etc.

      Shouldn't you ask them first? As far as I know, majority of people in Taiwan are against independence

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    8. Re:Now if this was on human rights... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Interesting point... the majority of people I know who are from Taiwan are for independence... but then, they're not living there anymore.

      On the other hand, Taiwan holds democratic elections, and they never elect the party that wants to reabsorb Taiwan into Mainland China -- and the margin isn't narrow by any means. I would say that this means that the majority of people in Taiwan are for independence. Either that, or the majority don't vote or consider it a big issue one way or the other.

    9. Re:Now if this was on human rights... by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      Actually they just voted in a landslide a party that is for closer ties with China and opposes independence:

      http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/13/world/asia/13taiwan.html?ex=1357880400&en=a7592848340eaa91&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

      Its funny how there are practically no polls conducted in Taiwan specifically on the issue of independence, not that I could find anyway.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    10. Re:Now if this was on human rights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how the hell are they supposed to improve their record.
      Are you proposing they re-write history?

      It's not their record that needs to be improved, it's their current performance.

    11. Re:Now if this was on human rights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Shouldn't you ask them first? As far as I know, majority of people in Taiwan are against independence.

      The "Main Landers" in Taiwan are mostly against independence, they are the people that escaped from the Communist Revolution in mainland to the island but the Original Taiwanes think that they are an Independent Country that was Conquered by China and Japan later, and after WWII let to China again.

  15. China by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    China kinda reminds me of the dog running in circles chasing it's own tail and then yelps when it catches it.

    And then does it all over again oblivious to anything around it until the stupid dog twirls it's own self into the hot fire place. The look on it's face is priceless.

    Then it grows up and starts chasing parked cars... and misses.

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:China by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

      Of course I could be talking about our own infallible US Government too.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
  16. If he's so good... by navygeek · · Score: 1

    But can he make the trains run on time?

  17. Cheaper Solution by EvilGrin5000 · · Score: 1

    Why go through all the trouble of controlling weather when they could just build a roof?
    Would this in any way have anything to do with China trying to impress anyone? I might be wrong but why the hell would they want to choose the instability and unpredictability of controlling weather patterns than just simply building a roof?

    Before you say that building a roof is not cheaper than shooting some chemical in the air, it's not just about price, it is also about certainty of results. You can get really really really lucky and it will NEVER rain and you'll never need a roof! But chances are that it will and your chemicals aren't going to stop it on time. Then what?
    Whoops! We're so sorry, we fucked up?

    Roofs have been around a long time, they've been proven to do what they're supposed to do...

    Maybe someone can enlighten me on their decision in the first place to not include roofs.

    --
    A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere. -- Groucho Marx
    1. Re:Cheaper Solution by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it's too expensive to roof the entire stadium, they could just make hundreds of thousands of tiny roofs, and maybe put them on top of sticks. Then all they do is handle these little portable roofs out to all the people attending. The athletes of course might have a problem, but the actual area they compete in is much smaller and it should be much cheaper to build a roof there. Hey, someone call Bezos, maybe he can patent that portable roof idea.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    2. Re:Cheaper Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard of the roof of the olympic statium in montréal, Canada? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_Stadium_(Montreal)#Continuing_problems

    3. Re:Cheaper Solution by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      >> Why go through all the trouble of controlling weather when they could just build a roof? you never lived in a totalitarian country, have you? Logic has nothing to do with what is going on.

    4. Re:Cheaper Solution by ozbird · · Score: 1

      They're called "umbrellas".

    5. Re:Cheaper Solution by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Thank you captain obvious, glad you got at least part of the joke.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    6. Re:Cheaper Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is common practice to take a facetious (attempt at humour) comment seriously as a way of saying that it really wasn't all that funny. Such a serious comment is actually a retaliatory form of humour too - almost derogatory - which I personally find kind of funny in itself.

      Of course, your comment could be considered similarly, though it gets exponentially tiresome after the first one, I think.

    7. Re:Cheaper Solution by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Why go through all the trouble of controlling weather when they could just build a roof?

      Because then they couldn't call it the "Bird's Nest" stadium. :-P
    8. Re:Cheaper Solution by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Captain Doublespeak; I got the joke just fine.

  18. This poor guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to imagine what will happen if he fails. My money is on him becoming the Chinese Olympics Symbol

  19. Goes right along with today's poll by DrWho520 · · Score: 1

    What is the Best Part of Being a Super Villain?

    One weather controlling, doomsday device, please!

    --
    The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
  20. rain coalesces around particulate matter by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    that's how rain making works with silver iodide

    with that effect in mind, china has a surefire way to stop the rain: stop producing so much particulate matter

    turn off the coal plants in may

    by 8/8/8, you're good to go

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:rain coalesces around particulate matter by dwater · · Score: 1

      that doesn't stop relief rain - ref. all those mountains right next to beijing.

      no, what they have to do it *increase* their particulating, but on the other side of the mountains, so that the rain comes down before it hits beijing.

      --
      Max.
  21. Idly misogynist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    My wife thinks cooking and fucking are two cities in China.

    1. Re:Idly misogynist by Tiberius_Fel · · Score: 1

      She's only half right; Fucking is in Austria.

      --
      Join the Empire! http://www.empirereborn.net/
    2. Re:Idly misogynist by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1

      There is a city called Wanking in China, though ;-)

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    3. Re:Idly misogynist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear ya and sympathise, brother!

  22. Looks like Tibet will have some unexpected company by naturalog · · Score: 1

    After the games are over, the Chinese plan to use their technology to cause massive droughts in North America, eventually causing our submission to the supreme red army. I for one welcome our new Chinese weather-manipulating overlords.

  23. Mad Scienteists by Laguerre · · Score: 5, Funny

    Zhang Qian, head of weather manipulation (best title to have on a business card ever)
    Mad scientists can't start out being James Bond villains. This seems like a great place for an aspiring mad scientist to work, fresh out of mad grad school.
    1. Re:Mad Scienteists by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      fresh out of mad [science] grad school

      If I could moderate individual words, the bolded one would be "-1 Redundant." We're all of us crazy!

    2. Re:Mad Scienteists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mad Grad School

      our motto: "What? Me Worry?"

    3. Re:Mad Scienteists by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they'll be hiring in a few years.

    4. Re:Mad Scienteists by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

      Bond? Do your homework! Everyone (that is, everyone who grew up in the UK in the past 30 years or so) knows that The Weatherman was one of the Bananaman villains, working under General Blight!

  24. Is it just me by wiredog · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Or did the /. UI just go to "Big, ugly, and lots of wasted space"? Huge green box at the top with (for some reason) links to random pictures and videos.

    Using FF3B2, BTW.

    1. Re:Is it just me by mattmcm · · Score: 1

      I'm getting that too. Screenshot

    2. Re:Is it just me by Nimey · · Score: 1

      No, it's me too. Notice how the story's on the "idle" virtual server. If you go here: http://idle.slashdot.org/ you'll see all the stories posted this way.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    3. Re:Is it just me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No this is the idle section. It's a slashdot/4chan/youtube casserole! It's separate from the main site, but stories posted here are still sent to the firehose. This is the underbelly I guess you could say.

    4. Re:Is it just me by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      No this is the idle section. It's a slashdot/4chan/youtube casserole! It's separate from the main site, but stories posted here are still sent to the firehose.
      And the RSS feed, apparently.
      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  25. Why not just tweak by netglen · · Score: 1

    their orbital mind control lasers into weather control platforms?

  26. which meme fits best? by davidwr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Vote:

    *All your weather are belong to us
    *Only old North Koreans need dry stadiums
    *In Maoist China, rain drops YOU!
    *Imagine a Beijing-Wolf cluster of dry stadiums!

    and the obligatory

    *I for one welcome our new weather-controlling communist overlords

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:which meme fits best? by MarkGriz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not a meme, per se, but this brings a whole new meaning to "Hacked by Chinese"

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  27. The rain in China by SlashDev · · Score: 0

    is not only made up of water, depending on where you are, it's one of the most severe case of acid rain on the planet.

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
  28. Concerned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone else concerned about the health of our athletes in a situation where China might disperse large amounts of chemicals into clouds to stop the dangerous rain?

    1. Re:Concerned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never been to China, have you?

      The "disperse large amounts of chemicals" is what passes for air there.

  29. This sounds like...... by cybvapor · · Score: 1

    ....a tag line for a bad summer action flick where some big explosion save the planet from certain doom. Seriously, don't they have other more pressing issues to spend money on like abject poverty?

    1. Re:This sounds like...... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, don't they have other more pressing issues to spend money on like abject poverty?


      Yeah, cause trying to attract as many rich tourists from all over the world as much as possible isn't going to do anything to alleviate China's poverty anyways.


      Oh wait..

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  30. Ni Hao Slashdot by dtml-try+MyNick · · Score: 1

    Looks like the Chinese cleared up a bit more then just rain.

    --
    Life starts at the end of your comfort zone.
  31. Paul McCartney has a story about this by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He says that during his Live in Red Square concert, it looked like there was going to be a storm, and officials sent a bunch of fighter jets scrambling over them causing the clouds to disappear, and soon after, it was a warm, sunny day. The story was much more detailed than that. It involved some official giving him assurance that the weather would be good on the day of the concert and other bits. A lot more interesting than I am able to recall right now.

    I wish I could remember when he said that, I could post a link to something.

  32. How hard can it be by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

    As the recent example in California shows, it never ever rains in an area where there are wild fires. Simply set the area around the stadium on fire and it will practically guarantee that there will be no rain. If a few clouds do gather, they can be easily dispersed by exploding a dozen or so nuclear weapons directly above the stadium

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  33. Someone notify John Fogherty by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Or maybe Saul Zantz still gets the check.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  34. Missing tag... by The+Damned+Yankee · · Score: 2, Funny

    whatcouldpossiblygowrong?

    --
    "Against the assault of laughter nothing can stand." - Mark Twain
  35. So... Mr President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that we know the true source of Global Warming what are we going to do about it?

  36. You HAVE to be kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US record on human rights is absolutely pathetic esp. since W. We employ death penalty JUST LIKE CHINA. We lock people up on an island, hold them horrible conditions and deny them rights for years, our prisons of today are what 3rd world countries had for eons. All in all America and China has more in common than differences.
    The idea that you are going to boycott them because of human right violations has to be one of the biggest jokes. You are the type who backs W's inhumane, immoral, and illegal actions.

  37. Nothing new for the Chinese by henrypijames · · Score: 4, Informative

    This thing isn't new at all: Eighteen years ago, at the 1990 Asian Games in Beijing, the organizers already managed to control the rain quite successfully. For instance, the opening ceremony which would have been disrupted by rain without intervention, ran smoothly in fairly sunny weather instead.

    The technique is simple: Detect in advance the clouds which could cause rain in Beijing, then send airplanes to spread special dust particles to cause those clouds to rain immediately, thus "empty" them before they reach Beijing.

    I'm quite convinced the Chinese aren't the only ones who's done this.

    1. Re:Nothing new for the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the cloud seeding outfit i used to do IT for would cite to its customers studies that claimed precip induction for one area actually increased downwind rainfall b/c there was sufficiently more available moisture that you weren't "robbing" the moisture that might have fallen downrange of the target area, and that inducing rain early actually increased the likeliness that precip would continue for the seeded cells.

      perhaps this is why they're stating it would be harder to manage heavy rain than light rain--if it's possible to dry up small clouds but only likely to make a bigger mess with juicier ones?

    2. Re:Nothing new for the Chinese by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

      They do this at the SLC International Airport. The airport is prone to getting thick fog in the winter time, so they will seed the clouds to cause the moisture in the air to bind, causing a very light drizzle instead of blanketing the area with thick fog. It's not perfect at all, but for intents and purposes, it works wonderfully.

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    3. Re:Nothing new for the Chinese by silicone_chemist · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope, it is done in the US to encourage rain to fall on the best areas. Like fields rather than cities. Texas is doing it and so are other states I'm sure. http://www.license.state.tx.us/weather/weatherfaq.htm

    4. Re:Nothing new for the Chinese by EVil+Lawyer · · Score: 1

      How do you know that it wouldn't have been sunny "without intervention"?

      Also, RTFA, their techniques don't involve airplanes (they use anti-aircraft guns), and calling what they send to the clouds "special dust particles" is like, totally non-informative.

  38. Russians Beat them To It? by spud603 · · Score: 1

    Apparantly, the soviets worked this out for the Goodwill Games in 1994.

  39. If it keeps on raining... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    ... the levee's gonna break

    1. Re:If it keeps on raining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it does, they'll have no place to go.

    2. Re:If it keeps on raining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll have to run through the jungle.

    3. Re:If it keeps on raining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could we call that a 'bungle in the jungle'?

  40. "Press the magic button, Beijing disappears" by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    No thanks, I'd hope there was a version of this or this walking the earth. At least they'd have the motivation to get rid of that country should that be necessary.

    Unlike the Bond movies, they'd have a greater chance of success.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  41. Splended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's great that they can control weather and all, but what's wrong with the roof?
    Roofs are usually 100% waterproof, regardless of light or heavy rain, with close to 100% success rate, does not need to many PhDs to deploy it.

  42. In Soviet Russia... by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

    ...the rain stops you

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
  43. This is gonna be offtopic by idontgno · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    and redundant...

    but still. Worst... Theme... Evar.

    Bring back OMG Ponies!

    Make everything babycrap brown like "IT". But make this horrible theme stop!

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  44. All Rain Drops by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

    that fall to the ground shall be collected taken to a dark dry room and be electrocuted with 10,000 Volts

  45. No problem by Lorean · · Score: 1

    Having lived in Beijing for half a year I can testify that it almost never rains anyways.

  46. I could see this coming. by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 1

    Yeah I always knew China would be able to control the weather. They'll just haul it away and have it shot.

    --
    I have nothing compelling to say
    1. Re:I could see this coming. by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Apparently with 7000 anti-aircraft cannons ... just to make sure it's really dead.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  47. HAARP? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

    That story was disappointing. I was hoping to hear something more exciting, like they've been sending their spy satellites over Alaska for the last 15 years, spying on the activity at HAARP, and have built their own, that's twice as big, and powerful enough to do almost anything they'd like.. Like, they could give a nice big rain storm a couple days before the Olympics, and then let it dry out for the people. Like, It'll be comfortable. (not dusty, not wet). Maybe induce just enough cloud cover so it won't be too hot.. :)

          It would be a bigger show if they could cause a huge area to have inner-cloud lightning strikes that would form the Olympic rings. hehe.

        Seeding clouds is boring old tech. I wanna know how to control it from my living room, without needing to get out of the Lazy-Boy.. :)

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  48. I hope.... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    ... it rains pitchforks & sino-girl babies on those bastards.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  49. Old Asian Secret... by hyperz69 · · Score: 1

    for staying dry in the rain. They called it the Umbrella! What will those crazy chinese invent next?

    1. Re:Old Asian Secret... by dwater · · Score: 1

      Well, in the 'Good Luck Beijing' events I've been to, they don't allow umbrellas. I think this is because they look unsightly to the cameras.

      --
      Max.
  50. contact Stewie by Dretep · · Score: 1

    Though I doubt he'd be willing to sell his weather control device to China.

  51. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  52. WTF by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    Ahrrrr! My slashdot, what are they doing to it!?!?

    The layout doesn't seem to be broken in any way other than concept, being a Web 2.0 Layout (TM). I mean, check out the rounded corners gradient semi-transparent overlay "Headlines from Slashdot" boxes to the right of the story text. Stuff doesn't just break and end up looking that way.

    This looks like a bunch of digg users hacked slashdot and redesigned it according to their screwed up sense of what a website should look like. To their credit, it renders fine in Opera.

  53. head of weather manipulation by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Only a Hotwarts-trained wizard should dare to represent himself as a Head of Weather Manipulation. Lesser muggles will surely fail.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  54. Butterfly Effect? by EdBear69 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if they stop a hurricane in China, does that mean a butterfly here will stop flapping its wings?

    --
    I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV...
    1. Re:Butterfly Effect? by kauttapiste · · Score: 1

      So if they stop a hurricane in China, does that mean a butterfly here will stop flapping its wings?
      I dunno about that but it sure will make my coding that much harder! http://www.xkcd.org/378/
  55. hehe by elixin77 · · Score: 1

    I'm going to laugh if it downpours the entire time.
     
      But that business card would be kick ass to have...

  56. I'd prefer "Storm Warden" by Tex+Bravado · · Score: 1

    but that's just 'cuz of my juvenile taste in fiction.

  57. Re:Rain's better than dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China gets some pretty awful dust storms. How are they going to stop those ?

  58. just import some Indonesian people by rodin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    because me and family has used their 'service' to 'move' the rain's location or time.... yes, without any satellite information or whatever technology

  59. Re: Theme by BCSWowbagger · · Score: 1
    I, for one, welcome our new aesthetically-impaired robot overlords.


    Really, it's hideous, and I can't even put my finger on why it's hideous. It just is. Gotta go uncheck the "willing to participate in new testing" box.

  60. Hey, the jerk store called... by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    They're running out of webpage layouts that look like ass.

  61. all our rains.. by h.ross.perot · · Score: 1

    .. belong to you...

    --
    ... I'll have a Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster with a side of Plutonium Nyborg ...
  62. Not actually obligatory by darkhitman · · Score: 1

    Is Zhang in charge of Gundam, too? Somebody's got to be.

    --
    Tell me something...it's still "We, the people"... right?
  63. Hogwart's Dining hall by MrPinstripeCom · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one envisioning the Dining hall from Harry Potter here?

    Picture it...storm clouds overhead, rain, winds, and inside, a temperate, dry 72degrees.

    We could also do it with millions of freakin LASERS.

  64. Filthy. by das_magpie · · Score: 1

    I really think this is a disgusting idea. Stopping the weather.

    Why the hell didn't they just build a roof on the stadium and let the weather do its thing?

  65. Perhaps heat. by foxtrot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Believe it or not, the United States already has this technology. And it's in the hands of the rednecks.

    There's a stock car track in Bristol, TN that holds 165,000 people, and has 43 800+ horsepower cars running around an oval just a shade over a half mile long. This generates a lot of heat-- body heat, engine heat, heat from tires cornering on concrete fast enough to turn fifteen second laps. Enough heat that, as long as the race is still running, rain clouds can blow over Bristol, drench the entire city with rain, but the pocket of high pressure due to the heat (and possibly some counter-clockwise swirling motion due to the cars) will keep the rain from passing directly over the track.

    If the caution flag flies and the cars slow down for too long, thus slowing the heat output and cooling the track, the rain may start to fall on the track, but it takes one heck of a storm to make the rain fall while the race is green-flagged.

    -F

    1. Re:Perhaps heat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha... Darrel Waltrip's Tornado effect as some would call it.

    2. Re:Perhaps heat. by initialE · · Score: 1

      So you want to stop the rain by... Baking the athletes?

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    3. Re:Perhaps heat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Vortex" theory was just a driver making idle speculation, it has . I'm leery of taking the scientific opinion of a redneck who drives in circles for a living as fact.

  66. Russia by Twisted64 · · Score: 1

    I heard that before parades in the Soviet Union, jets would pass overhead if it were cloudy, to disperse the clouds. An incredible waste of fuel, if true, but a clear sky IS nice for a good parade.

    --
    Consciousness is a myth. Trust me.
  67. Not that much rain to begin with by specific_pacific · · Score: 2, Informative

    Winters are dry and summers and not really wet, it's very much a dry city which is why the dust is such a problem. So maybe that'll make their jobs easier :)

    They do *make* it rain by exploding these sulfer/salt bombs though. It covers car in this yellowish coating sometimes.

    Before big visits it always rains for a couple of days before because they're doing this sort of thing. Then when the visitors arrive it's blue skies all round ;) Except for that time they forgot...

  68. Ha ha. Okay, China. . , you're scaring me. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I don't like to rustle up fear where none is needed, but you can start wars with that kind of imperial over-confidence.

    Seriously. After having had a long discussion with a very propagandized Chinese student who was filled to the brim with all kinds of English-hating, One-China, Taiwan-is-ours, imperialistic lunacy which is being fed wholesale to the half billion horney and doomed-never-to-have-wives young male population, I got a bunch of the bad chills and had to change my prosaic views on what China was all about.

    This weather manipulation thing is almost certainly propaganda for its own people designed to instill even further levels of insane national pride.


    -FL

  69. Re:Ha ha. Okay, China. . , you're scaring me. by arse+maker · · Score: 1

    Firstly, small scale rain manipulation is very possible. Secondly, yes, chinise are fun to talk to. Ask them about The Tiananmen Square Massacre, most will have no idea what you are talking about. The rest will argue against your so called facts, its all western lies and/or its a great thing the goverment protected the country. Funny to watch them attack you for no real reason :) If only the US farmed out the PR work to the chinese after kent state. Vietnam would have been the substitute for sliced bread in comparing the best things in life. On a side note, in sydney regular protests by chinese over the, ehm, bad treatment? :) of Falun Gong, Tibetens, well alot of people. I never quite understood their point, china has poor human rights, no shit. Its the chinese populous who dont know what happens, not the rest of the world, and I dont see too many of the chinese journalists covering your efforts. Guess when you aren't being persecuted you have too much free time.

  70. Re:Ha ha. Okay, China. . , you're scaring me. by dwater · · Score: 1

    "English-hating"?

    I'm English and living in China. I can't say I've noticed...

    Japanese-hating? Certainly.
    American-hating? Yes.
    English-hating? Not so much, I think.

    --
    Max.
  71. Re:Ha ha. Okay, China. . , you're scaring me. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I'm English and living in China. I can't say I've noticed...

    Just to be clear, I was speaking about English in the nationalistic sense rather than the linguistic.

    The guy I was talking to was chock-full of horrible stories about British imperial officers razing and plundering national monuments, summary executions of civilians, etc., and he was bristling with anger while describing it to me. Hopefully, he represents a minority.


    -FL

  72. Maybe, just maybe ... by Rockin'Robert · · Score: 0

    It'll stop falling on Blighty too, br> the start falling on the US - for a change.
    RR.

  73. Re:Ha ha. Okay, China. . , you're scaring me. by dwater · · Score: 1

    I'm English and living in China. I can't say I've noticed...

    Just to be clear, I was speaking about English in the nationalistic sense rather than the linguistic. Well, yes, so was I, obviously - I'm not the English language; I'm an English man.

    The guy I was talking to was chock-full of horrible stories about British imperial officers razing and plundering national monuments, summary executions of civilians, etc., and he was bristling with anger while describing it to me. Hopefully, he represents a minority.


    -FL

    Well, perhaps he is somewhat in a minority with the degree of his anger, but there's a certain degree of two-facedness[*] too. Of course, to blame just the British for that sort of behaviour is, so I'm lead to beleive, incorrect. The American and other nations (French?) are to blame too. Of course, America's more recent behaviour might well trump any anger for their behaviour back then, so making him forget that they were involved - or the defunct status of Britain as a super power, while the US is still one.
     
    ...but yes, there is *some* of that. The Chinese don't forget or forgive so easily, it seems.

    You can be sure that it's nothing compared to the bad feeling against America and especially Japan, IMO. Of course, that could be just due to them being two-faced [1].

    However, I can't help feeling that China has done much more damage to itself than any other single nation, and maybe even all other nations combined - even when it comes to monuments. No, I don't have any numbers to back that up, just feelings from stories I've been told.

    This does make me wonder about my own feelings towards the Danes (and other Scandinavians) and (more recently) the Germans. I can't say I have any particular bad feeling towards them despite their terrible behaviour towards England[2]. I wonder if it's because they had different names back then - Vikings, Normans and Nazis - that have now disappeared into the past. The English (and Japanese) are still called the same thing as they were when the corresponding atrocities were committed. I think the English are generally aware of their poor behaviour in history and somewhat repentant of it (depending on who you speak to). The Japanese, on the other hand, don't appear to be (from the Chinese point of view at least), for whatever reason - I suspect the atom bombings made them feel somehow the victim rather than the aggressor.
     
    ...but, what do I know? 'Not a lot' is the correct answer, so, here I am, on /., where I should be :)

    [1] Of course, having bad feelings towards a nation as a whole is a lot different to having bad feelings towards individuals you might meet that are from that nation; though not in the case of Japan, I think.
    [2] Yes, they were worse to other people.
    --
    Max.
  74. Rain in Beijing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that I've been in Beijing when a typhoon (correct name for that part of th world) has been parked off the coast, over the water there, it isn't a joke to speculate about a hurricane. And if that does happen, the weather for the games is not going to be pretty as I'm pretty sure a few planes with "special dust" is not going to be very significant.

    Beijing does, at certain times of the year (earlier than the Olympics), receive large amounts of tropical rain in the evening from weather that blows in from the coast as the rising air from the land sucks in moist air from the coast.

  75. No longer so skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last year, a couple of days before August 8 (i.e. just before one year from the start of the games) there was really strange weather in Beijing. Short random thunderstorms, Torrential downpours, and all sorts of other strange weather conditions. Then on August 8, it was blue skies and sunshine for a week. Maybe it was just coincidence, but it sure got a lot of people wondering just what the government was up to.

    As for mucking about with the weather not causing too many problems, well, just look at what's happening in southern china at the moment. Normally the weather is almost subtropical and you can wear tshirts at this time of year. Currently they're knee deep in snow and 600,000 people are stranded trying to get home for the Chinese new year.