Slashdot Mirror


Scientology Given Direct Access To eBay Database

An anonymous reader writes "The Church of Scientology can delete auctions from eBay with no supervision under the VeRO program, and has used this to delete all resale of the e-meters Scientologists use. This is to stop members from buying used units from ex-members instead of buying from the official (and very expensive) source. Given Scientology's record of fraud and abuse, should eBay give them this level of trust? Will this set a precedent for other companies that want to stop the aftermarket resale of their products?"

81 of 684 comments (clear)

  1. Don't tell Chef but by qw(name) · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just go to Radio Shack and buy an ohmmeter. They're a lot cheaper.

    1. Re:Don't tell Chef but by rishistar · · Score: 4, Funny

      But I'm Hindu you insensitive clod! I have to use an Aum-meter for my religious measurements!

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    2. Re:Don't tell Chef but by thanksforthecrabs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does this mean my "What Would Xenu Do?" t-shirt isn't legal?

    3. Re:Don't tell Chef but by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny
      The Church of Scientology has ruined lives, had people imprisoned on false charges, sued innocent people into bankruptcy, committed espionage, harassed critics at their jobs, silence free speech, etc.

      There is nothing funny about them.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Bobb+Sledd · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it's OK. "Xenu do" was already a movie from the 80's starring Olivia Newton-John.

      --
      "They said I probly shouldn't fly with just one eye," "I am Bender. Please insert girder."
    5. Re:Don't tell Chef but by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny
      Does this mean my "What Would Xenu Do?" t-shirt isn't legal?

      The problem with "WWXD?" is that it's just not a terribly useful guiding philosophy. For instance, imagine you're in a situation where you're having trouble getting along with your coworkers, and so you ask yourself, "WWXD?" The answer is that Xenu would round up his coworkers, put them on some starships shaped like DC-8 airliners, ship them to the distant reaches of the galaxy, and then nuke them into oblivion. So, as you can see, "WWXD?" has two major problems:

      First, the solution is *always* to put people on spaceships shaped like 1950s-era jet airliners and then nuke them, because that's all we know about Xenu. "WWXD?" dictates that you put people on DC-8 shaped spaceships and then nuke them in any situation, whether it's marital problems, dealing with the poor, or feeling frustrated that you dropped your grilled cheese sandwich: just round up a bunch of people, put them on airplane-shaped spaceships, and then drop a bunch of H-bombs on them. It's just not very flexible as a philosophy.

      The second issue with the "WWXD?" philosophy is more practical. Xenu was an evil galactic overlord. As a galactic overlord, he had lots of resources, in particular, lots of minions and henchmen to round people up and put them on spaceships, and lots of spaceships shaped like DC-8s, and lots of thermonuclear bombs. Unless you have access to similar resources, "WWXD?" is just not practical to apply to your everyday life. Although I admit, when I think of how to deal with Scientologists, and then ask "WWXD?", I have to admit that the philosophy does have some appeal.

    6. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Neo_piper · · Score: 5, Informative
    7. Re:Don't tell Chef but by snowraver1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to Wiki, It IS a variant of a Wheatstone Bridge, and was not built by Hubbard himself (even though he owned the patent for the device), but rather by one of the members of the church (presumably a higher ranking member). The meter was then given to Hubbard, who went on to patent it.

      Read the wiki linked to in the article summary. Very Interesting.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    8. Re:Don't tell Chef but by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "WWXD?"
      Scientologists are now allowed access to the eBay database without supervision? Shit-fire, these whackjobs shouldn't be allowed access to public transportation without supervision.

      What is eBay thinking? I'm not going to read TFA because it'll probably make my head hurt, but I'm hoping this was some oversight on eBay's part and the outcry is going to make them re-evaluate this "vErO" policy or whatever the hell it's called. I don't see why anybody should have this level of access to eBay besides the folks who administer the site. So this means that if I put a used computer up for sale on eBay Microsoft can delete it because there's a good chance that it has Windows on it? Disney can delete my auction of a used copy of The Little Mermaid? Or how about Apple being able to delete my auction of an old iPod (including 5000 mp3s)?

      I suppose it's just too much trouble to expect a third party to have to write a C&D letter to eBay, sort of like how it's too much trouble for the NSA to get an after-the-fact warrant signed by a judge before they listen in on the phone calls of US citizens.

      I'd like to say I'll never deal with eBay again, except for the fact that I've never dealt with eBay in the first place. I do like to barter through the Illinois Trade Association, though. If you think auctions are a cool way to do business, you really need to check out barter. It's one way to keep the government out of your grill.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Don't tell Chef but by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, if Ebay is willing to give one group of sociopaths access to their auctions, odds are there'll be other groups of people with axes to grind that will be clamoring for a similar level of control. This is a goddamned stupid thing for Ebay to do ... I can't think of a single legitimate reason for it. The only possibility that comes to mind is that there are some highly-placed Scientologists at that company. That actually wouldn't surprise me: those bastards are truly insidious.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    10. Re:Don't tell Chef but by EllisDees · · Score: 4, Funny

      >I thought making fun of religions was not allowed because it was insensitive and intolerant ?

      Anything is "allowed", as far as free speech goes. While making fun of a religion might be insensitive and intolerant, making fun of Scientology is neither. Scientology is a religion like tofu is a meat.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  2. short answer by Romancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Short answer, no.

    This is favoritism. Microsoft doesn't even have this ability to stop the resale of their software.

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    1. Re:short answer by AoT · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It isn't even favoritism, it's outright stupid given CoS' past abuses.

    2. Re:short answer by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's outright stupid, period. Why does ebay give this power to anyone? What do they possibly stand to gain from it? And how on earth does the CoS, or anyone, restrict after-market resale of their products? It's called the free market and it's America. Licensing software is one thing, but a physical object? What ?

    3. Re:short answer by AoT · · Score: 5, Informative
      eBay explains here why they do it. I would guess that it's easier for them(read: costs less money) to simply let the companies do the work of deleting auctions, rather than have the company call or email eBay every time they want something taken down.

      I especially love their section on how things won't be mistakenly removed:

      How eBay helps to ensure that listings aren't mistakenly removed. A rights owner reporting through VeRO must be registered through VeRO before reporting items to us. Rights owners sign legally binding documents when reporting items to eBay. Ooooh! Legal binding documents, I feel so safe.
    4. Re:short answer by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know, I simply don't understand why the government lets $cientology have its cake and eat it too. If they're a religion, then they shouldn't be afforded all these civil protections. I'm not going to get sued by my local Catholic Diocese if I print nasty bits from the Bible or some part of the latest Papal encyclical.

      I think the government should give $cientology a choice; either be a religion, in which case you can't sue, you can't seek special favors from companies over the resale of your products, and so forth, or you're not a religion, and you're a business, in which case you've got to pay taxes on moneys or products changing hands.

      And in either case, their lawyers should be disbarred for multiple cases of malicious prosecution.

      Or, in short form, FUCK $CIENTOLOGY.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:short answer by jandrese · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Filing a Copyright Counter Notice. For listings that have been removed at the request of the rights owner for copyright infringement, you may have the option of filing a Counter Notice with eBay if you feel that your listings were removed in error and you have not been able to come to an agreement with the rights owner.

      A Counter Notice is a form provided by eBay in compliance with the requirements of the federal Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The form is a legal document that requires you to, among other things, certify under sworn penalty of perjury that your listings were not infringing and were removed by mistake or misidentification. When you sign a Counter Notice, you will also have to consent to federal jurisdiction and service of process. Please read this form carefully, so you fully understand what you agree to if you choose to submit it to eBay.

      Once a valid Counter Notice is submitted, eBay will provide a copy of the notice to the reporting party and will advise them that the listings will be reinstated after 10 business days if we do not hear from the reporting party that they have filed an action seeking a court order to restrain you from re-listing the items.
      This part is interesting. Assuming eBay doesn't just file 13 these counterclaim notices, I wonder which way a Federal court would rule on it? I don't see where they have legal grounds for a copyright case on a hardware device that you're just reselling. I'm not sure many people want to deal with the CoS lawyers long enough to find out though.
      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    6. Re:short answer by Teun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's outright stupid, period. Why does ebay give this power to anyone? Because CO$ has a lot of nasty lawyers.
      They run a despicable business that can only survive thanks to litigation.

      This story of E-bay associating with CO$ cannot possibly be good for E-bay's reputation.
      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    7. Re:short answer by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Informative

      Would this contract be legally binding in the US? If I sign a contract allowing you to kill me, would it be legal for you to then kill me?

      No, because case precedent says there are certain rights you can't legally sign away. Slavery and your life are included in that. They are deemed rights which you can't legally waive. Ever. (*)

      Would anyone trying to stop you from fulfilling this contract then be liable for knowingly helping me to breach a contract?

      No, because the contract is prima facie invalid -- meaning, it wasn't ever a valid contract, so trying to enforce the terms of said contract is meaningless.

      Cheers

      (*) There could be some place where you could, but that place shares no legal history with us.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  3. Is this legal? by obstalesgone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it, in general, legal to allow a vendor to prevent the resale of their product? I don't understand why this would be considered beneficial to society or why it wouldn't be considered monopolistic.

    Of course, I'm no lawyer, but I've heard that everyone on Slashdot is.

    1. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm an eBay PowerSeller, and I can tell you that it's rampant. eBay's "VeRO" program is regularly abused by liars who have no right to interfere in aftermarket sales of their products, gambling on the fact that you won't file in federal court to contest their "good faith" declarations.

    2. Re:Is this legal? by Romancer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Preventing the resale is one thing, direct access to a market is unprecidented. Since scientology doesn't actually own these devices any longer and ebay has given then direct access to removing these devices from private sale this is definatly a step over the line.

      Imagine if the makers of the other products out there followed suit. You would not be able to purchase second hand goods. Only directly from the original outlet. Kinda stifles the economy since the majority of vehicles out there are purchased as used items. Just one example but it would have a very bad impact if this method of controlling profit spreads.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    3. Re:Is this legal? by jandrese · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The way I read the description, all you have to do is file a counterclaim and then it is up to the VeRO user to get a federal order within 10 days or your auction goes back up. If they can get a federal judge to go along with them then VeRO is the least of your problems.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  4. What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems to me that given the recent Project Chanology protests against Scientology, this would be the perfect time for Anonymous to organize a massive boycott of eBay. Or worse, expand their DOS and hack attacks to include eBay, since they're cooperating with the CoS.

    Posting this AC because, frankly, I don't want anybody to think I'm advocating this. I'm just saying I wouldn't be surprised if it happened.

  5. do they also have access to customer info? by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do they just have the ability to delete sales, or do they also have access to the details of who's been bidding, selling, and buying?

    Yet another reason to not use EBay or PayPal.

  6. Curious by jav1231 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who knew the NSA is the least the vast conspiracy-minded unwashed have to fear.

    I wonder who at eBay is high up the kook-chain in Scientology?

    1. Re:Curious by Dekortage · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, if you RTFA, it has nothing to do with insider knowledge. Instead:

      "The mechanism that permits the Church of Scientology (and others) such broad access and discretion is called the Verified Rights Owner ("VeRO") Program. Membership in VeRO is obtained simply by submitting a form to eBay explaining that you are an Intellectual Property rights holder. ... It should come as little surprise that VeRO members routinely overreach, as the cost of challenging a listing removal is almost always prohibitive. ... The VeRO Program makes a great deal of sense for some types of listings -- counterfeit Rolexes and Gucci handbags appear on eBay with such frequent regularity that those companies would be hard pressed to handle these trademark violations any other way."

      eBay has more info about their VeRO program.

      Basically, the original summary is misleading: lots of companies (e.g. copyright/trademark holders) have access to directly delete auctions on eBay. The Slyentologists are only one of many (but they're fun to pick on!).

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  7. does this work for every producer by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I am the manufaturer of a widgit, what do I have to do to gain access to Ebay to delete whatever auctions I want? Do I just have to write in the EULA that I have this right and then go onto Ebay and delete the auctions of competitors.

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
  8. F-meter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think their membership is ready for an F-meter which indicates just how much they are being fucked over by their own church.

  9. Uh, what? by ack154 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was under the impression this was exactly the kind of reason eBay existed. "hey, i don't use this junk anymore, what'll you give me for it?" If the "church" was really given this kind of power, that's just not right.

    Perhaps if they wanted to curb the resale of their devices, they should offer some sort of buy back program? They'll still turn around and sell them again and make a profit.

  10. Off topic, yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Shawn Lonsdale, whose one-man crusade against Scientology made him a public enemy of the church, was found dead at his home over the weekend in an apparent suicide. He was 39."

    http://www.xenu-directory.net/critics/lonsdale1.html

    That's pretty sad.

  11. this = Scientology by eleuthero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Though the fraud claim will probably lead to slashdot getting sued, Germany http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2007/12/08/scientology_facing_ban_in_germany/5643/ and several other countries have taken steps to limit scientology within their borders. While many might seek to compare this to the actions of many Islamist states, scientology's claims often involve situations that fall under racketeering laws not aspects of religious freedom.

  12. Anything for Tom by sweetser · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is a privilege to do everything in our power for Tom. This crap is so valuable, you should pay a lot to prove you are a sucker.

    --
    Working on new views of old physics at http://VisualPhysics.org
  13. Thats it! by Coraon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I will not work with ANY company that works with those evil *deleted*. I will no longer use e-bay or paypal. they want my business back, go neutral or allow all religious groups to delete auctions.

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
  14. Re:easy answer -or- +5 insightful by Wuhao · · Score: 5, Informative

    If that's "+5 Insightful" around here these day, then I want a piece of the action: 1 + 1 = 2. This profound result is equally surprising.

  15. indulgences by SoupGuru · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hopefully the Catholics won't find out I've been reselling my indulgences too!

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
  16. Re:how direct an access is what bother me more by Applekid · · Score: 4, Informative
    At the top of that page:

    This list of rights owners DOES NOT include all rights owners that report through the VeRO Program. These are the rights owners that have chosen to post About Me pages. Many other rights owners have chosen not to maintain an About Me page.
    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  17. Ebay is right on schedule by MECC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If what they want is to put an end to their online existence. Giving CoS carte blanc to delete auctions is worse that putting the fox in charge of the hen house. Was Ebay, presumable savvy to how the Internet works, thinking nobody would notice this? What kind of drugs do you have to take to get that delusional?

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  18. The cat is out of the bag anyway by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A quick google for "e-meter schematic" reveals about 1200 pages. The first few that I checked have the circuit diagram for the e-meter, often directly drawn from L. Ron Hubbard's 1966 patent.

    For those who can't figure out the diagram, it's basically a Wheatstone bridge with a simple (crappy) differential amplifier. It's the sort of thing anyone could build from pennies worth of components.

  19. My guess is... by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's probably cheaper for Ebay to simply acquiesce to the CoS demands than to meet them in court. Even if they win, they may never see their legal fees recovered. There is less risk involved in giving in, too: they loose almost nothing if they yank the items, but could potentially lose a fortune if they don't.

    The Scientologists are just that scary.

    --
    weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    1. Re:My guess is... by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Scientology must die. It was already a sign that they are beyond control when they can intimidate the IRS let alone eBay. I find it amazing that they've been able to do what they've done to this point. They are indeed frightening and that is reason enough to want the whole operation disbanded. I wonder how the EU is doing with the CoS? Last I heard some member nations were refusing to recognize them as a religion.

      It's a given that CoS will abuse eBay's information. I guess it's already too late to purge my account.

    2. Re:My guess is... by KublaiKhan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Germany, especially, which is launching an investigation into their practices.

      You may be interested in the phenomenon of Anonymous--a sort of movement that has coalesced to fight against the abuses of the Church of Scientology.

      Interestingly, the 'official' position (if so nebulous a thing can have anything 'official') is not that the -religion- of scientology is wrong and evil, but that the -organization- that calls itself the 'Church of Scientology' does not deserve tax exemption, recognition as a church, etc.

      I've been keeping track of Anonymous for some time--they seem to be the origin of many of the various memes that end up getting popular, so they seem to work well as a sort of miner's canary when discerning the opinion of the internet in general. This is, to my knowledge, the first time that this particular phenomenon has occurred--an internet movement that has had significant international effect in the real world. What makes it even more interesting is that it -has no leaders-. Somehow, out of total anarchy, it's managed to coalesce a sort of identity to itself, and has directed attention towards a single goal.

      At any rate, it appears that as a followup to the February 10th protests (which were remarkable in themselves in that they were entirely without violence and none of the protesters in any of the countries were arrested--that has to be a first, in a protest of that scope) there are another series of protests being planned for March 15th--sort of a "Happy Birthday" to Hubbard, whose birthday was apparently March 13th and not conveniently on a Saturday this year. I've also heard some mention of plans for April, but not being an Anon, I don't know the details.

      IIRC, one of the Anonymous-sponsored websites is youfoundthecard.com; it's worth looking into.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    3. Re:My guess is... by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Where I live, Belgium, they are not considered a religion. Neither are they in Germany:

      On November 11, 2004 the Administrative Court in Cologne ruled that the monitoring of SO Germany by the Office for the Protection of the Consitution is lawful. The Court underlined that there are clear indications that the SO pursues anticonstitutional activities directed at abolishing the human rights guaranteed in the Basic Constitutional Law (Grundgesetz). An appeal at the Higher Administrative Court in Münster is pending. This is, interestingly, also the only group that does not benefit from some of the basic advances of the European integration. For example, Scientologists have been excluded from the free circulation of workers since Van Duyn v Home Office in 1974.

      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
  20. This is perfectly legal by arkham6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The government is not stopping sale of e-meters, and eBay, as a private vendor, can fully decide what and what not can be sold on their site. If they choose not to allow sale of e-meters, then thats their prerogative.

    The CoS is not doing anything illegal either, since they are acting now as an agent of E bay.

    But I think a much better question is, what did scientology do to eBay to get them to agree to this?

  21. Re:VERO Program by Beau6183 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    FTFA:

    But Bill's e-meters (and the e-meters other ex-Scientologists have attempted to sell on eBay) are not counterfeits and do not violate the Church of Scientology's trademarks, patents, or copyrights.


    In any case, it's a lazy way for EBay to enforce rights compliance.

    Similarly, Mormon garments are another item that seem to take advantage of this program, so it's not exactly unheard of. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_garment/
  22. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by rootofevil · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
  23. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is important and it is relevant to the main story, because Co$ victims are often first thought to have committed suicide. There is a direct link between the main story and this news. Co$ is a dangerous cult.

  24. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Hillgiant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Erm, excuse me. What does God need with a starship?

    --
    -
  25. E-meter like a condom by cgfsd · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would equate an E-meter to that of a condom. Two things you would never want to buy used and two things used for screwing people.

  26. Holy crap NO by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given Scientology's record of fraud and abuse, should eBay give them this level of trust?

    The answer is right there. Would you want any group with Scientology's record of fraud and abuse to have access to anything important?

    What do you want to bet they'd pull auctions of other Scientology-questionable stuff that isn't e meters?

    Put a DVD copy of Anonymous' Scientology protests up for sale and watch what happens. What do you want to bet that it winds up deleted? Blocking e meter sales my ass - this is nothing more than some goofy cult making decisions about what you're allowed to buy. Don't let it happen!

    These people are batshit fucking insane. Don't legitimize them by giving them any sort of power, control, or authority whatsoever.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  27. Most important reason: by WolfTheWerewolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... so the CoS can get the name and address of the auction lister, then Fair Game them as they see fit.
    According to eBay's VeRO ToS they will gladly hand this information over.

  28. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by milsoRgen · · Score: 4, Informative

    You must not be very familiar with the space opera that is Scientology. You see it's all about getting the thetans out. I believe they were an ancient race, that Xenu the galactic prince brought to earth 75 million years ago, set near some volcanoes near Hawaii. Then dropped H bombs in said volcanoes, and somehow their spirits latched on to us homo sapiens, and block our natural super powers, caused all our problems... Etc etc etc. I don't think god shows up in the story, but I could be wrong...

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  29. Who cares? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If someone is drinking the Scientology Kool Aid, then does it really matter whether or not they get discounted second hand equipment? If Scientology has their hooks into you they will get your money one way or another.

    What they're really trying to control is the purchase of scientology collectables by non-scientologists.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  30. Completely Misleading by Kashra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course, another completely misleading headline and article summary.

    The VeRO program does not provide direct access to eBay's database to delete items. It is a fast-track for manufacturers to submit deletion requests for items they believe are infringing on their copyrights. Every time an auction is deleted, the VeRO program gives eBay the proper documents holding the manufacturers legally responsible for their claim of copyright infringement.

    Taking a simple look at the program's description reveals that ANY auction being deleted through this program can be reinstated, automatically, by the user, within 10 days. They simply have to do the same thing the manufacturer did: claim legal responsibility for their auction, in writing.

    Now, there's no doubt that I, as a private individual, would never risk challenging the very well funded battery of lawyers the Church of Scientology has to keep me in line. Even though I know they have no leg to stand on, I can't afford the legal battle. But I wouldn't cry that its eBay's fault, when eBay gave me the option to directly challenge the "manufacturer".

    --
    If you can't find a real troll, just mod down whoever you don't agree with!
    1. Re:Completely Misleading by touretzky · · Score: 4, Informative

      eBay's counternotification policy for VeRO takedowns applies only to claims of copyright infringement. (Read the page you linked to.) Scientology is using bogus trademark infringement claims to take down E-meter listings. Therefore, counternotification is not available.

  31. yes of course it is by Quadraginta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    E-Bay is private firm, and they're free to list or not list sales on their site for any reason whatsoever, including because the "Church" of Scientology asserts some utterly bogus intellectual property right, or because they just feel like it.

    The C of S is not "preventing the resale of their product," they're just preventing the resale through E-Bay and with E-Bay's cooperation. You can still put an ad in the paper and sell it, or put up a notice in your neighborhood market, or just walk around town with a sign attached to you saying "E-Meter Cheap!"

    And who gives a shit what the lawyers think? Why should the law be relevant here? This isn't a question you want the lawyers thinking about, because you can be damn sure that any solution they think up is going to cost you far more in cash and personal liberty than you would like to part with. Do you want there to be a law telling you what you can and cannot sell on your personal website? Do you want to have to get your Craigslist ad vetted by the police before it can go up? Do you want the FBI to have the right to interrogate you about whether you sold your pet cat or unused furniture to the right people, and in the right way?

    Christ, let us keep the lawyers in the fridge, OK? If there's a big market for secondhand E-meters, and E-Bay foolishly foregoes it because they want to keep the Scientologists happy, then let someone start up a private website devoted to reselling E-Meters, and he will make scads of money, more than enough to dare the "Church" to sue him, and get their clueless clock cleaned and get hit for beaucoup lawyer fees on top of it.

    But what I suspect is that ex-Scientologists who want to recoup some of the financial loss associated with their recent vacation from rationality are a very small group, and while it kinda sucks that when there's very few of you and a whole lot of someone else (in this case, non-ex-Scientologists, or pre-ex-Scientologists), you have to tread carefully, that's just life in a wide-open democracy. It's not like an intelligent and determined person can't work around this problem fairly easily. I'm sure if I had an E-Meter to sell, I could do it easily enough without E-Bay or the Church getting a clue. Probably my 16-year-old could, too.

  32. Re:a bit misleading by sholden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not sure if scientologists are exactly the group I'd want ebay to "we can (and you authorize us to) disclose your User ID, name, street address, city, state, zip code, country, phone number, email, and company name to eBay VeRO Program participants as we in our sole discretion believe necessary or appropriate in connection with an investigation of fraud, intellectual property infringement, piracy, or other unlawful activity."

  33. Re:$3700 Wheatstone bridges? by linuxguy1454 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The current version of the E-meter known as the "Mark VIII Super Quantum E-meter" is a highly modified version of the 60's patented version. So no, you could not come close to it's functionality with that original patent's design, and it is not just a Wheatstone bridge. So a lawsuit on false advertising wouldn't succeed.

    Also, as a result of the fruitless '60-s investication of the CoS and it's E-meters by the IRS, the church had to add a disclaimer on all E-meters sold since then that the device in itself did nothing and was only to be used by trained or in-training Scientology ministers. Perhaps this is one reason that is motivating them to control the resale of used E-meters- so that they aren't accused of violating that '60s ruling by the IRS.

    That's my $.02

  34. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by notnAP · · Score: 4, Informative

    And you must not be very familiar with the space opera that is Star Trek, from which the GP was quoting quite humorously.

  35. I hope that's just blustering... by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Funny

    [L]ast I tried a DOS on eBay for fucking with my mother's account, it only took a mere 5,000 simulataneous requests every ten seconds to DOS them. Err, did you forget to click the Post Anonymously checkbox before admitting to an act which may carry civil and/or criminal penalties?
    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  36. Microsoft vs. the Church of Scientology by touretzky · · Score: 4, Funny

    Q: What's the difference between Microsoft and the Church of Scientology?

    A: One is a wealthy and powerful criminal enterprise bent on world domination, while the other, ah, ummm.... Microsoft has better health benefits.

  37. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by ethanms · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's sad, but I can't stop myself from replying to this obvious nerd bait...... the quote is from Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, not "The Undiscovered Country"

  38. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by milsoRgen · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  39. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by monkeyboythom · · Score: 5, Funny

    I dunno...my girlfriend has religious paraphenalia that needs electricity. I know because when I am in another room, I can hear a buzzing sound in the bedroom and her chanting, "oh, god. oh, god! ohhhhh, gooood!"

    The real question is, since when does your religious paraphernalia need to be be plugged into the wall?
  40. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by d3ac0n · · Score: 4, Funny

    Argh!

    You are correct. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098382/quotes

    I give myself one geek demerit for picking the wrong movie.

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  41. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You shouldn't talk of things about which you are ignorant.

    There almost certainly was a historical Buddha. There is far more evidence for this, from independent sources, than for (e.g.) Socrates.

    And FYI, the Buddha never said he was anything but a normal man. In fact, he stated again and again that he was just that -- not some kind of a God or superbeing.

  42. Another example of the abusive VERO program by gleffler · · Score: 4, Informative

    eBay has long since decided to deputize any company that feels like signing papers with complete and unfettered access to eBay. Anyone that signs a "legally binding document" can then gain power to delete any auction from eBay for whatever reason they feel like. If it's because of counterfeit or provably stolen product, that's fine, but eBay's history of repudiating first sale has really gotten tiring.

    Try reselling Weight Watchers program materials. They get deleted on a regular basis because Weight Watchers doesn't like it if you resell them. There's no legal basis for this, and if you push the issue with eBay, the response you get is "Well, they said they don't want you selling them, so too bad." They tell you to "take it up with Weight Watchers" who says "We say you can't sell them, and that's that."

    VeRO is a bullshit program that lets eBay wash their hands of legitimate issues on the site and that gives companies ridiculously too much power. Do you think that if I set up a stand at a flea market reselling legally acquired materials, that the flea market owners would stand for the publisher of those materials walking around with a rubber hose and yanking the items away if I tried to sell them?

    This isn't news, hopefully this just pushes VeRO into the public eye and convinces eBay to get rid of it, or to force "rights owners" (I wasn't aware that a "right to prevent resale" existed) to actually file individual complaints based on some sort of legal theory to delist an item, not just "We don't want these resold." Scn is abusing it like they abuse everything else, but this system seems to be made specifically to facilitate abuse.

  43. Re:What fraud and abuse? by Cheesey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fraud and abuse? Well, no Scientology discussion can be complete without a link to Bare Faced Messiah, the unauthorised biography of L. Ron Hubbard. It is very interesting stuff. The man lived recently enough that there are plenty of verifiable historical facts about him, and he was certainly an extraordinary guy.

    Any Scientologists reading this topic have no doubt already heard about Bare Faced Messiah and the lies contained within it, invented (of course) by the Church's enemies in order to discredit Hubbard and his ideas. To you I say: what if your perception of reality is wrong? What if you have been lied to, that a sort of Matrix has been built around you by your friends and colleagues at the Church? Wouldn't you at least like to see what other people's reality looks like? No need to take any pills, the truth might be a click away...

    --
    >north
    You're an immobile computer, remember?
  44. Re:Church by FiloEleven · · Score: 4, Informative

    What *I* really don't get is why people don't just call Scientology for what it is: a sect. Most likely because it isn't a sect; it's a cult. At least, it has more characteristics of a cult than a sect. Sects are groups of people with a certain set of beliefs that have broken off from a parent religion (or cult). Scientology never had a parent, so the term "sect" is a misnomer. Its practices (strict control of its members and its secrecy being the most apparent) closely match those associated with cults. The biggest difference between scientology and your run-of-the-mill cult is its massive size and influence, which is large enough to cause colleges nationwide to rename a class from something like "A Study of Cults" to something like "New Religious Movements" for fear of lawsuits.
  45. Re:Church by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A sect? I consider them organized crime.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  46. No, *do* laugh at them by edremy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Yes, there is nothing at all funny about the things that Scientology does. But their beliefs *should* be held up for public ridicule, all the more so since they are so damn protective of them. Ridicule is an amazingly powerful tool when engaged in a battle of ideas, and this is at the core a battle of ideas. They want people to think they are some sort of wonderful self help operation that will give you insight into your mind and help you through difficult times. Having a pile of people pointing out what they really believe and laughing at them infuriates them, helps keep the suckers away and defuses their power as a "church".

    Think about the South Park episode that went through the entire theology of the CoS, with a big blinking sign that read "This is what Scientologists actually believe" over the animation. That was even more effective than the "Dum Dum Dum Dum Dum" song refrain about the Mormons, all the more so since there was no attempt at all at the end of the episode to paint actual CoS members as decent human beings, unlike the Mormon episode.

    Laugh at them.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  47. Oh, okay. It's just blustering, after all. by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, I just don't give a fuck. What's the law going to do? I just opened 5,000 various auctions in my Firefox browser and set them to auto-refresh at the same time. The fact that their servers couldn't stand up to a simulation of 5,000 people clicking 'refresh' at the same time doesn't constitute a violation of law. The key word in the sentence is 'TRIED' not 'successfully carried out' My bad. You *attempted* to commit a felony. Didn't mean to ruffle your feathers there, chief.

    In that case, never mind. It's much more likely that you executed a denial of service attack on your *own* machine than on eBay. I mean, you do know that Firefox has an upper limit on how many connections it will actually open at the same time, right? (Go to about:config and filter for "connect.") All other connections are just placed in a queue until Firefox has an available slot. The slowdown was entirely on your own machine and LAN.

    I mean, honestly... Did you really think that you were being some sort of 1337 super-hax0r by using *one* machine on a single home or school connection to bog down one of the largest e-commerce sites on the planet?

    (Oh, also, your proposed Million Loser March is more likely to DoS your proxy service than eBay itself.)

    The law's tried it before anyways. I run rings around them every time, simpyly because most judges aren't smart enough to know what they're trying to charge me for. Sure thing, kid. Keep saying things like that in a public forum. We're all in awe of your brilliance and eagerly await to see the way in which your intellect would dazzle the courtroom.
    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  48. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    The problem with "WWCBND?" is that it's just not a terribly useful guiding philosophy. For instance, imagine you're in a situation where you're having trouble getting along with your coworkers, and so you ask yourself, "WWCBND?" The answer is that CowboyNeal would sit on a couch, eat Pringles, and play video games. So, as you can see, "WWCBND?" has two major problems:

    First, the solution is *always* to sit on a couch, eat Pringles, and play video games because that's all we know about CowboyNeal. "WWCBND?" dictates that you sit on a couch, eat Pringles, and play video games in any situation, whether it's marital problems, dealing with the poor, or feeling frustrated that you dropped your grilled cheese sandwich: just sit on a couch, eat some Pringles, and play video games. It's just not very flexible as a philosophy.

    The second issue with the "WWCBND?" philosophy is more practical. CowboyNeal is a fat slob. As a fat slob, he already has the resources to follow through with this plan, in particular, he has a couch, lots of Pringles, and plenty of video games to play. Unless you have access to similar resources, "WWCBND?" is just not practical to apply to your everyday life. Although I admit, when I think of how to deal with the fact that I too am a fat slob, and then ask "WWCBND?", I have to admit that the philosophy does have some appeal.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  49. Re:Church by emilper · · Score: 5, Funny

    no, it's a sect, a split from the Church of "Astounding Stories".

  50. Open letter to eBay by chord.wav · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear eBay,
    Get some balls.

    Sincerely,
    Me

  51. E-Bay has been doing this since 1998! by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is the same thing that eBay has been doing since they killed my auctions in 1998.

    You see, Microsoft wanted to engage in illegal price fixing, and killed my auctions reselling copies of Microsoft software that I had won as door prizes.

    I had never agreed to a license agreement, so I was not bound by it, but eBay still allowed Microsoft to kill my auctions.

    It was only after I won my small-claims lawsuit against eBay for breech of contract, and another small claims court suit against Microsoft for slander that I got another eBay account. That's why my account says "since 1999."

    Anyway, great job hopping on this story 9 years later, /.

    Andy

  52. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by spun · · Score: 5, Informative

    What is your problem? The Fishman Affidavit is a court document, that's not a good enough cite for you that L. Ron Hubbard actually said that Jesus likes little boys? Or did you not bother to read (or not comprehend) the website and assumed the poster was bashing your favorite fairy tale?

    Let me be perfectly clear then: Scientology makes the claim, in their official religious literature, that Jesus was a homosexual pedophile. That is backed up by court records.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  53. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by eclectic4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Correct.

    And things like rising from an untimely death after being nailed to a cross (or tree) three days after dying (and then celebrating), having a last supper, being born of a virgin, being the son of a god, etc... were all prevalent beliefs of pagan mythology at the time of and well before Jesus. A guy who had these "myths" thrown upon his name decades after he was dead in order to start a religion.

    People forget that the history of most religions are far more "earth-bound" than they like to realize...

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  54. E-Meter? Ha! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

    An E-Meter is no match for the "Church of Jobs" iMeter!

  55. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know... sitting on a couch, eating Pringles, and playing video games has never caused wars or anything. The world would be a better place if people followed CowboyNeal's fine example.

  56. Re:Church by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I want to know about Christianity, I can buy a Bible. I could even get free bibles if I know where to look. I could find a million different people preaching about the religion. I could find people who would be head over heals to go in depth about their beliefs for absolutley no money. I could sell a Bible on eBay and the pope isn't going to delete it. On the other hand, Scientology offers nothing except a promise of enlightment for a large sum of money. They don't follow through and have so much against them legally and morally that it is sophomoric to compare them to a real religion. Say what you want about religion, but a true religion is open (like most major religions) and a cult is closed (like Scientology). Taking jabs at mainstream religion is childish and ignores the real issues. And finally, Christianity's largest atrocities occured centuries ago, the stuff Scientology has done is completely out of place for the 20th and 21st century. I'm not trying to defend Christianity out of zealotry (I do not practice Christianity or Judaism, the two religions of my parents, although I do believe in God), I'm defending it because in this day and age it is a respectful religion to follow and one that isn't based around money, crime and tax breaks. Sure, one may not agree with some views but those views are open book. Scientology won't tell you their views because they are idiotic. All the stuff we know about Xenu is from leaks. Scientology never volunteered that information, and for a good reason. Until you are brainwashed, it sounds like pure BS.