Slashdot Mirror


Scientology Given Direct Access To eBay Database

An anonymous reader writes "The Church of Scientology can delete auctions from eBay with no supervision under the VeRO program, and has used this to delete all resale of the e-meters Scientologists use. This is to stop members from buying used units from ex-members instead of buying from the official (and very expensive) source. Given Scientology's record of fraud and abuse, should eBay give them this level of trust? Will this set a precedent for other companies that want to stop the aftermarket resale of their products?"

152 of 684 comments (clear)

  1. Don't tell Chef but by qw(name) · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just go to Radio Shack and buy an ohmmeter. They're a lot cheaper.

    1. Re:Don't tell Chef but by rishistar · · Score: 4, Funny

      But I'm Hindu you insensitive clod! I have to use an Aum-meter for my religious measurements!

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    2. Re:Don't tell Chef but by thanksforthecrabs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does this mean my "What Would Xenu Do?" t-shirt isn't legal?

    3. Re:Don't tell Chef but by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny
      The Church of Scientology has ruined lives, had people imprisoned on false charges, sued innocent people into bankruptcy, committed espionage, harassed critics at their jobs, silence free speech, etc.

      There is nothing funny about them.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To be honest, it is pretty funny. I know I'm a jerk for thinking it, but I really think that the sort of people who fall for the crap they are pedlling are simply paying a stupidity tax.

      What sane and rational person would want an "e-meter" anyway?

      (As AC, so feel free to mod me -1 Jerk :)

    5. Re:Don't tell Chef but by KublaiKhan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think so. I don't have any of my notes with me at the moment, so I'd have to look up where I found that information in the first place, but I'm fairly sure that it was some variant thereof.

      Interestingly, I'd also read that Hubbard did not build the first one himself, and possibly may not have designed it--that he had hired an electrical engineer to do that.

      As I recall, there was a patent filed in....1995, I think, that covered 'improvements' to the device in question (which is the grounds for the eBay removals, IIRC)--it may not work quite the same today as it used to.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    6. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Bobb+Sledd · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it's OK. "Xenu do" was already a movie from the 80's starring Olivia Newton-John.

      --
      "They said I probly shouldn't fly with just one eye," "I am Bender. Please insert girder."
    7. Re:Don't tell Chef but by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny
      Does this mean my "What Would Xenu Do?" t-shirt isn't legal?

      The problem with "WWXD?" is that it's just not a terribly useful guiding philosophy. For instance, imagine you're in a situation where you're having trouble getting along with your coworkers, and so you ask yourself, "WWXD?" The answer is that Xenu would round up his coworkers, put them on some starships shaped like DC-8 airliners, ship them to the distant reaches of the galaxy, and then nuke them into oblivion. So, as you can see, "WWXD?" has two major problems:

      First, the solution is *always* to put people on spaceships shaped like 1950s-era jet airliners and then nuke them, because that's all we know about Xenu. "WWXD?" dictates that you put people on DC-8 shaped spaceships and then nuke them in any situation, whether it's marital problems, dealing with the poor, or feeling frustrated that you dropped your grilled cheese sandwich: just round up a bunch of people, put them on airplane-shaped spaceships, and then drop a bunch of H-bombs on them. It's just not very flexible as a philosophy.

      The second issue with the "WWXD?" philosophy is more practical. Xenu was an evil galactic overlord. As a galactic overlord, he had lots of resources, in particular, lots of minions and henchmen to round people up and put them on spaceships, and lots of spaceships shaped like DC-8s, and lots of thermonuclear bombs. Unless you have access to similar resources, "WWXD?" is just not practical to apply to your everyday life. Although I admit, when I think of how to deal with Scientologists, and then ask "WWXD?", I have to admit that the philosophy does have some appeal.

    8. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Neo_piper · · Score: 5, Informative
    9. Re:Don't tell Chef but by neumayr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yes it is.
      Just like followers of the Catholic Church ("contraception is evil"), some flavours of Islam ("kill those infidels"), and pretty much all religious fundamentalists (those people calling their offspring "Baby Jesus", for example).

      All pretty funny, IMO. If I didn't think it's funny I'd probably be very depressed.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    10. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Ozric · · Score: 2, Interesting
    11. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

      The second issue with the "WWXD?" philosophy is more practical. Xenu was an evil galactic overlord. As a galactic overlord, he had lots of resources, in particular, lots of minions and henchmen to round people up and put them on spaceships, and lots of spaceships shaped like DC-8s, and lots of thermonuclear bombs. Unless you have access to similar resources, "WWXD?" is just not practical to apply to your everyday life.

      I agree this is a big problem. I don't know about any of you, but all my spaceships are shaped like DC-10s.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    12. Re:Don't tell Chef but by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2, Funny

      just round up a bunch of people, put them on airplane-shaped spaceships, and then drop a bunch of H-bombs on them. It's just not very flexible as a philosophy.


      Sure, but to give Xenu his due: I always seem to feel better after doing this, too. It's even more effective at picking me up than ice cream.
    13. Re:Don't tell Chef but by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think old ladies are pretty stupid for falling for con men too. But I sure wouldn't find it amusing if it happened to my grandmother.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:Don't tell Chef but by snowraver1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to Wiki, It IS a variant of a Wheatstone Bridge, and was not built by Hubbard himself (even though he owned the patent for the device), but rather by one of the members of the church (presumably a higher ranking member). The meter was then given to Hubbard, who went on to patent it.

      Read the wiki linked to in the article summary. Very Interesting.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    15. Re:Don't tell Chef but by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "WWXD?"
      Scientologists are now allowed access to the eBay database without supervision? Shit-fire, these whackjobs shouldn't be allowed access to public transportation without supervision.

      What is eBay thinking? I'm not going to read TFA because it'll probably make my head hurt, but I'm hoping this was some oversight on eBay's part and the outcry is going to make them re-evaluate this "vErO" policy or whatever the hell it's called. I don't see why anybody should have this level of access to eBay besides the folks who administer the site. So this means that if I put a used computer up for sale on eBay Microsoft can delete it because there's a good chance that it has Windows on it? Disney can delete my auction of a used copy of The Little Mermaid? Or how about Apple being able to delete my auction of an old iPod (including 5000 mp3s)?

      I suppose it's just too much trouble to expect a third party to have to write a C&D letter to eBay, sort of like how it's too much trouble for the NSA to get an after-the-fact warrant signed by a judge before they listen in on the phone calls of US citizens.

      I'd like to say I'll never deal with eBay again, except for the fact that I've never dealt with eBay in the first place. I do like to barter through the Illinois Trade Association, though. If you think auctions are a cool way to do business, you really need to check out barter. It's one way to keep the government out of your grill.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    16. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Library+Spoff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does it tell you mdma levels in pills? cool, where can i get one?

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    17. Re:Don't tell Chef but by jdjbuffalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're supposed to report it to the IRS but if you don't actually make money (or reasonably would have) then they couldn't really get tax money out of you anyways. For example, if you trade your computer repairs for Joe's plumbing service and they are both about the same value (assuming just labor and no parts) then I don't see how anyone makes any money on it.

      This isn't to say that the IRS wouldn't try to get taxes from you but most bartering stuff is done under the table and unless you're doing massive amounts the IRS will never know.

      --
      We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.
    18. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      For example, if you trade your computer repairs for Joe's plumbing service and they are both about the same value (assuming just labor and no parts) then I don't see how anyone makes any money on it.
      You fail at economics.
    19. Re:Don't tell Chef but by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, if Ebay is willing to give one group of sociopaths access to their auctions, odds are there'll be other groups of people with axes to grind that will be clamoring for a similar level of control. This is a goddamned stupid thing for Ebay to do ... I can't think of a single legitimate reason for it. The only possibility that comes to mind is that there are some highly-placed Scientologists at that company. That actually wouldn't surprise me: those bastards are truly insidious.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    20. Re:Don't tell Chef but by ardin,mcallister · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know you're a troll, but muslims are not the evil people you think they are. You're thinking of Islamic Extremists. They're the ones that blow shit up. And scientology is insane, thats why we can make fun of it.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Scientology
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology_beliefs_and_practices
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology

      Read that crap and tell me they aren't more insane than Creationists!

      --
      "Some men just want to watch the world burn..."
    21. Re:Don't tell Chef but by EllisDees · · Score: 4, Funny

      >I thought making fun of religions was not allowed because it was insensitive and intolerant ?

      Anything is "allowed", as far as free speech goes. While making fun of a religion might be insensitive and intolerant, making fun of Scientology is neither. Scientology is a religion like tofu is a meat.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  2. short answer by Romancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Short answer, no.

    This is favoritism. Microsoft doesn't even have this ability to stop the resale of their software.

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    1. Re:short answer by AoT · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It isn't even favoritism, it's outright stupid given CoS' past abuses.

    2. Re:short answer by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's outright stupid, period. Why does ebay give this power to anyone? What do they possibly stand to gain from it? And how on earth does the CoS, or anyone, restrict after-market resale of their products? It's called the free market and it's America. Licensing software is one thing, but a physical object? What ?

    3. Re:short answer by AoT · · Score: 5, Informative
      eBay explains here why they do it. I would guess that it's easier for them(read: costs less money) to simply let the companies do the work of deleting auctions, rather than have the company call or email eBay every time they want something taken down.

      I especially love their section on how things won't be mistakenly removed:

      How eBay helps to ensure that listings aren't mistakenly removed. A rights owner reporting through VeRO must be registered through VeRO before reporting items to us. Rights owners sign legally binding documents when reporting items to eBay. Ooooh! Legal binding documents, I feel so safe.
    4. Re:short answer by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know, I simply don't understand why the government lets $cientology have its cake and eat it too. If they're a religion, then they shouldn't be afforded all these civil protections. I'm not going to get sued by my local Catholic Diocese if I print nasty bits from the Bible or some part of the latest Papal encyclical.

      I think the government should give $cientology a choice; either be a religion, in which case you can't sue, you can't seek special favors from companies over the resale of your products, and so forth, or you're not a religion, and you're a business, in which case you've got to pay taxes on moneys or products changing hands.

      And in either case, their lawyers should be disbarred for multiple cases of malicious prosecution.

      Or, in short form, FUCK $CIENTOLOGY.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:short answer by jandrese · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Filing a Copyright Counter Notice. For listings that have been removed at the request of the rights owner for copyright infringement, you may have the option of filing a Counter Notice with eBay if you feel that your listings were removed in error and you have not been able to come to an agreement with the rights owner.

      A Counter Notice is a form provided by eBay in compliance with the requirements of the federal Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The form is a legal document that requires you to, among other things, certify under sworn penalty of perjury that your listings were not infringing and were removed by mistake or misidentification. When you sign a Counter Notice, you will also have to consent to federal jurisdiction and service of process. Please read this form carefully, so you fully understand what you agree to if you choose to submit it to eBay.

      Once a valid Counter Notice is submitted, eBay will provide a copy of the notice to the reporting party and will advise them that the listings will be reinstated after 10 business days if we do not hear from the reporting party that they have filed an action seeking a court order to restrain you from re-listing the items.
      This part is interesting. Assuming eBay doesn't just file 13 these counterclaim notices, I wonder which way a Federal court would rule on it? I don't see where they have legal grounds for a copyright case on a hardware device that you're just reselling. I'm not sure many people want to deal with the CoS lawyers long enough to find out though.
      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    6. Re:short answer by pipatron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1) Group X could prove that anyone sellying Item Y was under contract not to resell it.

      Would this contract be legally binding in the US? If I sign a contract allowing you to kill me, would it be legal for you to then kill me? Would anyone trying to stop you from fulfilling this contract then be liable for knowingly helping me to breach a contract?

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    7. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First off I agree with the previous poster who said eBay should not give this much control to anyone.

      However, I think it is reaching to say (or suggest/infer/whatever) that eBay has no right to do this because it impinges your right to resell stuff.

      Yes, you do have a right to resell any thing or object you've legally acquired. But you don't have a right to do it on eBay. You buy and/or sell stuff on eBay according to eBay's terms, just as with any other service provider. As frustrating as it may be at times, eBay has the right to limit what is sold on their site. I think they're totally out of their gourd, mind you, but they are within their rights.

    8. Re:short answer by Teun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's outright stupid, period. Why does ebay give this power to anyone? Because CO$ has a lot of nasty lawyers.
      They run a despicable business that can only survive thanks to litigation.

      This story of E-bay associating with CO$ cannot possibly be good for E-bay's reputation.
      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    9. Re:short answer by KarmaOverDogma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Short answer, No."

      Agreed, but here's one example of where they did:

      I had a NRFB MSOffice product posted on eBay and it was yanked by the Microsoft police because it was an "educational version." Their argument was, since I couldn't guarantee it would be sold to a qualified educational beneficiary as per their license distribution agreement, it was illegal.

      and so down it went.

      --
      uR iGn0ranc3, Their Power
    10. Re:short answer by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Informative

      Would this contract be legally binding in the US? If I sign a contract allowing you to kill me, would it be legal for you to then kill me?

      No, because case precedent says there are certain rights you can't legally sign away. Slavery and your life are included in that. They are deemed rights which you can't legally waive. Ever. (*)

      Would anyone trying to stop you from fulfilling this contract then be liable for knowingly helping me to breach a contract?

      No, because the contract is prima facie invalid -- meaning, it wasn't ever a valid contract, so trying to enforce the terms of said contract is meaningless.

      Cheers

      (*) There could be some place where you could, but that place shares no legal history with us.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  3. Is this legal? by obstalesgone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it, in general, legal to allow a vendor to prevent the resale of their product? I don't understand why this would be considered beneficial to society or why it wouldn't be considered monopolistic.

    Of course, I'm no lawyer, but I've heard that everyone on Slashdot is.

    1. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm an eBay PowerSeller, and I can tell you that it's rampant. eBay's "VeRO" program is regularly abused by liars who have no right to interfere in aftermarket sales of their products, gambling on the fact that you won't file in federal court to contest their "good faith" declarations.

    2. Re:Is this legal? by Romancer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Preventing the resale is one thing, direct access to a market is unprecidented. Since scientology doesn't actually own these devices any longer and ebay has given then direct access to removing these devices from private sale this is definatly a step over the line.

      Imagine if the makers of the other products out there followed suit. You would not be able to purchase second hand goods. Only directly from the original outlet. Kinda stifles the economy since the majority of vehicles out there are purchased as used items. Just one example but it would have a very bad impact if this method of controlling profit spreads.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    3. Re:Is this legal? by AoT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Other companies have come before SoC.

      a Partial list

    4. Re:Is this legal? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Is this legal? by jandrese · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The way I read the description, all you have to do is file a counterclaim and then it is up to the VeRO user to get a federal order within 10 days or your auction goes back up. If they can get a federal judge to go along with them then VeRO is the least of your problems.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  4. What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems to me that given the recent Project Chanology protests against Scientology, this would be the perfect time for Anonymous to organize a massive boycott of eBay. Or worse, expand their DOS and hack attacks to include eBay, since they're cooperating with the CoS.

    Posting this AC because, frankly, I don't want anybody to think I'm advocating this. I'm just saying I wouldn't be surprised if it happened.

    1. Re:What will Anonymous do? by AoT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sure they could think of some creative ways to mess with eBay.

      Mass false bidding on auctions or the like. Not to give suggestions or anything, but they could start sniping auction with fake accounts and never pay. Doing it on a large enough scale could affect eBay's bottom line. They could start spamming people with emails about how eBay is going broke. I'm sure there's plenty of other things I'm not even thinking about that they could do.

    2. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Khyber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're not thinking rationally. Were Anonymous to DOS eBay, they would make a one-day severe dent in eBay's profitability. eBay would have a tarnished reputation (worse than it already is tarnished) and Anonymous, having nothing better to do, would just use every proxy available to keep up the DOS for as long as they please with little fear of being found, while everyone cheers them on. Anonymous may consist of mainly pedos and trolls, but there are the few that know their business and can bring most any online company to their knees with a botnet or two, and there are plenty of spin doctors amongst the Anonymous. When they say they are Legion, they're not fucking joking. Ten million requests at once will bring almost ANY server without load management to it's knees, and last I tried a DOS on eBay for fucking with my mother's account, it only took a mere 5,000 simulataneous requests every ten seconds to DOS them. Imagine ten million browser tabs with auto-reload set using proxy connections. Yea, huge DOS.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  5. how direct an access is what bother me more by superwiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It could be just the media frenzy making a bigger deal of isolated incidents than the real deal is, but it seems like the group is both paranoid and vindictive. I am more worried about them trying to use this as an opportunity to supress criticism than to use it to supress second hand resales. Although why one shouldn't be able to resell one's physical property in a free contry is beyond me.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:how direct an access is what bother me more by AoT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given that the Church of Scientology isn't on the list of VeRO about me pages, the whole thing seems really, really iffy.

    2. Re:how direct an access is what bother me more by Applekid · · Score: 4, Informative
      At the top of that page:

      This list of rights owners DOES NOT include all rights owners that report through the VeRO Program. These are the rights owners that have chosen to post About Me pages. Many other rights owners have chosen not to maintain an About Me page.
      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
  6. do they also have access to customer info? by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do they just have the ability to delete sales, or do they also have access to the details of who's been bidding, selling, and buying?

    Yet another reason to not use EBay or PayPal.

  7. Curious by jav1231 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who knew the NSA is the least the vast conspiracy-minded unwashed have to fear.

    I wonder who at eBay is high up the kook-chain in Scientology?

    1. Re:Curious by Dekortage · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, if you RTFA, it has nothing to do with insider knowledge. Instead:

      "The mechanism that permits the Church of Scientology (and others) such broad access and discretion is called the Verified Rights Owner ("VeRO") Program. Membership in VeRO is obtained simply by submitting a form to eBay explaining that you are an Intellectual Property rights holder. ... It should come as little surprise that VeRO members routinely overreach, as the cost of challenging a listing removal is almost always prohibitive. ... The VeRO Program makes a great deal of sense for some types of listings -- counterfeit Rolexes and Gucci handbags appear on eBay with such frequent regularity that those companies would be hard pressed to handle these trademark violations any other way."

      eBay has more info about their VeRO program.

      Basically, the original summary is misleading: lots of companies (e.g. copyright/trademark holders) have access to directly delete auctions on eBay. The Slyentologists are only one of many (but they're fun to pick on!).

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  8. does this work for every producer by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I am the manufaturer of a widgit, what do I have to do to gain access to Ebay to delete whatever auctions I want? Do I just have to write in the EULA that I have this right and then go onto Ebay and delete the auctions of competitors.

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
  9. F-meter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think their membership is ready for an F-meter which indicates just how much they are being fucked over by their own church.

  10. Uh, what? by ack154 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was under the impression this was exactly the kind of reason eBay existed. "hey, i don't use this junk anymore, what'll you give me for it?" If the "church" was really given this kind of power, that's just not right.

    Perhaps if they wanted to curb the resale of their devices, they should offer some sort of buy back program? They'll still turn around and sell them again and make a profit.

  11. Off topic, yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Shawn Lonsdale, whose one-man crusade against Scientology made him a public enemy of the church, was found dead at his home over the weekend in an apparent suicide. He was 39."

    http://www.xenu-directory.net/critics/lonsdale1.html

    That's pretty sad.

  12. this = Scientology by eleuthero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Though the fraud claim will probably lead to slashdot getting sued, Germany http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2007/12/08/scientology_facing_ban_in_germany/5643/ and several other countries have taken steps to limit scientology within their borders. While many might seek to compare this to the actions of many Islamist states, scientology's claims often involve situations that fall under racketeering laws not aspects of religious freedom.

    1. Re:this = Scientology by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Though the fraud claim will probably lead to slashdot getting sued, Germany http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2007/12/08/scientology_facing_ban_in_germany/5643/ and several other countries have taken steps to limit scientology within their borders. While many might seek to compare this to the actions of many Islamist states, scientology's claims often involve situations that fall under racketeering laws not aspects of religious freedom.


      And then there's this:

      http://www.xenu-directory.net/news/19920912-globeandmail.html
      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  13. bordering on illegal by mehtars · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This action of preventing the resale of a product is illegal--- once I buy a device, I am free to resell it. For example an auto maker cannot force me not to resell a car.

    1. Re:bordering on illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is absolutely legal. eBay has every right to allow whoever they want to delete auctions from THEIR website. They aren't denying you your right to resell anything, they are just denying you from being able to do it using THEIR product (eBay.com). For example, an auto maker can't force you to not resell a car, but they can certainly have deals in place with certain locations (such as partnering dealerships) that would deny you from being able to resell your car there. You are still free to sell it from your home or any other place that allows it.

      For the record, I definitely think eBay shouldn't allow this, but it is most definitely legal and within their rights.

  14. Ah, one more good reason... by Knara · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...to stop using eBay to sell your used stuff.

  15. Anything for Tom by sweetser · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is a privilege to do everything in our power for Tom. This crap is so valuable, you should pay a lot to prove you are a sucker.

    --
    Working on new views of old physics at http://VisualPhysics.org
  16. I'm torn... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Part of me feels bad because this just sounds so wrong on so many levels and these people should be able to sell that garbage. Quite honestly I'm going to argue that the Church of Scientology is not environmentally friendly if they're going to force people to buy new and not ever get used. If they can't sell this stuff used it's going to end up in the garbage.

    The other part of me can't help but laugh hysterically that these people actually bought in to Scientology in the first place.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  17. Thats it! by Coraon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I will not work with ANY company that works with those evil *deleted*. I will no longer use e-bay or paypal. they want my business back, go neutral or allow all religious groups to delete auctions.

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
  18. Re:easy answer -or- +5 insightful by Wuhao · · Score: 5, Informative

    If that's "+5 Insightful" around here these day, then I want a piece of the action: 1 + 1 = 2. This profound result is equally surprising.

  19. indulgences by SoupGuru · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hopefully the Catholics won't find out I've been reselling my indulgences too!

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
  20. VERO Program by dcollins · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's pretty obvious from the early comments that not many people RTFA. (Comments like, "I wonder who at eBay is high up the kook-chain in Scientology?" and all that.) This is an established EBay program called VERO that Scientology has joined, like a bunch of other manufacturers, and (big surprise) happens to be abusing.

    The mechanism that permits the Church of Scientology (and others) such broad access and discretion is called the Verified Rights Owner ("VeRO") Program. Membership in VeRO is obtained simply by submitting a form to eBay explaining that you are an Intellectual Property rights holder.

    It should come as little surprise that VeRO members routinely overreach, as the cost of challenging a listing removal is almost always prohibitive. (See my paper on this subject here, and see the brave husband and wife exception to this rule here.) The VeRO Program makes a great deal of sense for some types of listings--counterfeit Rolexes and Gucci handbags appear on eBay with such frequent regularity that those companies would be hard pressed to handle these trademark violations any other way.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:VERO Program by Beau6183 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      FTFA:

      But Bill's e-meters (and the e-meters other ex-Scientologists have attempted to sell on eBay) are not counterfeits and do not violate the Church of Scientology's trademarks, patents, or copyrights.


      In any case, it's a lazy way for EBay to enforce rights compliance.

      Similarly, Mormon garments are another item that seem to take advantage of this program, so it's not exactly unheard of. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_garment/
  21. Ebay is right on schedule by MECC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If what they want is to put an end to their online existence. Giving CoS carte blanc to delete auctions is worse that putting the fox in charge of the hen house. Was Ebay, presumable savvy to how the Internet works, thinking nobody would notice this? What kind of drugs do you have to take to get that delusional?

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  22. Wonderful by LittleGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now where am I going to go to resell my Top Gun action figures or my White Tony Manuro Disco Suit?

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  23. The cat is out of the bag anyway by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A quick google for "e-meter schematic" reveals about 1200 pages. The first few that I checked have the circuit diagram for the e-meter, often directly drawn from L. Ron Hubbard's 1966 patent.

    For those who can't figure out the diagram, it's basically a Wheatstone bridge with a simple (crappy) differential amplifier. It's the sort of thing anyone could build from pennies worth of components.

  24. My guess is... by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's probably cheaper for Ebay to simply acquiesce to the CoS demands than to meet them in court. Even if they win, they may never see their legal fees recovered. There is less risk involved in giving in, too: they loose almost nothing if they yank the items, but could potentially lose a fortune if they don't.

    The Scientologists are just that scary.

    --
    weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    1. Re:My guess is... by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Scientology must die. It was already a sign that they are beyond control when they can intimidate the IRS let alone eBay. I find it amazing that they've been able to do what they've done to this point. They are indeed frightening and that is reason enough to want the whole operation disbanded. I wonder how the EU is doing with the CoS? Last I heard some member nations were refusing to recognize them as a religion.

      It's a given that CoS will abuse eBay's information. I guess it's already too late to purge my account.

    2. Re:My guess is... by KublaiKhan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Germany, especially, which is launching an investigation into their practices.

      You may be interested in the phenomenon of Anonymous--a sort of movement that has coalesced to fight against the abuses of the Church of Scientology.

      Interestingly, the 'official' position (if so nebulous a thing can have anything 'official') is not that the -religion- of scientology is wrong and evil, but that the -organization- that calls itself the 'Church of Scientology' does not deserve tax exemption, recognition as a church, etc.

      I've been keeping track of Anonymous for some time--they seem to be the origin of many of the various memes that end up getting popular, so they seem to work well as a sort of miner's canary when discerning the opinion of the internet in general. This is, to my knowledge, the first time that this particular phenomenon has occurred--an internet movement that has had significant international effect in the real world. What makes it even more interesting is that it -has no leaders-. Somehow, out of total anarchy, it's managed to coalesce a sort of identity to itself, and has directed attention towards a single goal.

      At any rate, it appears that as a followup to the February 10th protests (which were remarkable in themselves in that they were entirely without violence and none of the protesters in any of the countries were arrested--that has to be a first, in a protest of that scope) there are another series of protests being planned for March 15th--sort of a "Happy Birthday" to Hubbard, whose birthday was apparently March 13th and not conveniently on a Saturday this year. I've also heard some mention of plans for April, but not being an Anon, I don't know the details.

      IIRC, one of the Anonymous-sponsored websites is youfoundthecard.com; it's worth looking into.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    3. Re:My guess is... by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Where I live, Belgium, they are not considered a religion. Neither are they in Germany:

      On November 11, 2004 the Administrative Court in Cologne ruled that the monitoring of SO Germany by the Office for the Protection of the Consitution is lawful. The Court underlined that there are clear indications that the SO pursues anticonstitutional activities directed at abolishing the human rights guaranteed in the Basic Constitutional Law (Grundgesetz). An appeal at the Higher Administrative Court in Münster is pending. This is, interestingly, also the only group that does not benefit from some of the basic advances of the European integration. For example, Scientologists have been excluded from the free circulation of workers since Van Duyn v Home Office in 1974.

      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    4. Re:My guess is... by KublaiKhan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most protests aren't quite as large and as widely distributed as the Feb 10 protests.

      Reports had attendance figures anywhere from the high 5k mark up to over the 9k mark, and there was a presence over a fair portion of the world.

      I found some of the footage I saw amusing, though, especially the Atlanta protest where they called out the SWAT team to stand on the Scientologist's side of the street.

      (Though...isn't there a water shortage there? 'cuz the Scientologists had their sprinklers on in a bunch of the pictures; I was under the impression that sprinkler usage wasn't allowed at the moment?)

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    5. Re:My guess is... by KublaiKhan · · Score: 2, Informative

      From what I understand, the Church of Scientology is convinced at the moment that the Anonymous movement is being underwritten by either German psychiatrists or a space alien invader fleet.

      Zim assures me that it's not him. ;-p

      And apologies if I conveyed an unclear message; I did not intend to denigrate the efforts of the folks who have been fighting against the practices of the Church of Scientology for some time now.

      However, the Anonymous movement arose independently of the anti-scientology movement; it's only after (I think) January 23rd of this year that there began to be any sort of significant overlap between Anonymous and the existing anti-scientology organization. Anonymous has existed as an internet-based entity for some years now, and is only now making a significant crossover to the 'real world'.

      I would caution you against underestimating Anonymous--there's rather a lot more to it than one might expect on first glance. Dismissing it as "just another example of a real world group coordinating via the internet" ignores some of the more interesting parts of this phenomenon.

      As a disclaimer, I'm not an Anon myself--I just watch 'em.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    6. Re:My guess is... by KublaiKhan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, that's alright. My nice thick blinds will keep me safe. ;-p

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    7. Re:My guess is... by dysfunct · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not only about holding the protest on a Saturday - March 15th is the Idus Martiae, the Ides of March, which perfectly fits Anonymous' style of rhetoric.

      --
      :/- spoon(_).
  25. This is perfectly legal by arkham6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The government is not stopping sale of e-meters, and eBay, as a private vendor, can fully decide what and what not can be sold on their site. If they choose not to allow sale of e-meters, then thats their prerogative.

    The CoS is not doing anything illegal either, since they are acting now as an agent of E bay.

    But I think a much better question is, what did scientology do to eBay to get them to agree to this?

  26. $3700 Wheatstone bridges? by Entropius · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually, Co$ could probably be sued for false advertising.

    The name of the product is the "Mark VIII Super Quantum E-meter". A Wheatstone bridge, however, works on completely classical principles.

    Or maybe resistance is quantized, with one quantum of resistance being equal to the extra resistance from one extra thetan hanging around?

    1. Re:$3700 Wheatstone bridges? by linuxguy1454 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The current version of the E-meter known as the "Mark VIII Super Quantum E-meter" is a highly modified version of the 60's patented version. So no, you could not come close to it's functionality with that original patent's design, and it is not just a Wheatstone bridge. So a lawsuit on false advertising wouldn't succeed.

      Also, as a result of the fruitless '60-s investication of the CoS and it's E-meters by the IRS, the church had to add a disclaimer on all E-meters sold since then that the device in itself did nothing and was only to be used by trained or in-training Scientology ministers. Perhaps this is one reason that is motivating them to control the resale of used E-meters- so that they aren't accused of violating that '60s ruling by the IRS.

      That's my $.02

    2. Re:$3700 Wheatstone bridges? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or maybe resistance is quantized, with one quantum of resistance being equal to the extra resistance from one extra thetan hanging around?

      In my own experiments with E-meters (purchased off E-bay of course), I've found that one quantum of resistance is equal to two thetans. If you have an even number of thetans, then add one, there's no change at all, but add one more onto that, and bam, it jumps up.

      Weird, I know. The universe is a mysterious place.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  27. a bit misleading by qw0ntum · · Score: 3, Informative

    The summary and title are a bit misleading. The CoS is removing listings using the VeRO program, not getting "direct DB access" as is claimed. Still blatant abuse of the program, so their actions are definitely NOT defensible.

    Interestingly people who are targeted by this can file a DMCA counter claim and bring the issue into the court system. I hope this guy does that - maybe some of the CoS's practices can finally see the light of day.

    --
    'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
    1. Re:a bit misleading by sholden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not sure if scientologists are exactly the group I'd want ebay to "we can (and you authorize us to) disclose your User ID, name, street address, city, state, zip code, country, phone number, email, and company name to eBay VeRO Program participants as we in our sole discretion believe necessary or appropriate in connection with an investigation of fraud, intellectual property infringement, piracy, or other unlawful activity."

  28. Is it just me, or... by Bearhouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is there rather a lot of anti-Scientology stuff here recently?

    Interestingly, I don't see a lot - make that *any* pro-posts either. Surely somewhere in the vast /. userbase there must be some of L. Ron's acolytes. Plenty of science and SciFci fans here.

    C'mon boys, stand up for your faith!

    Or is that forbidden too?

    1. Re:Is it just me, or... by prizm1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm a Scientologist and a Slashdot reader (who knew there could be such a thing?!). I generally just ignore these sorts of things, but as you say, there have been more of negative posts about my religion on here lately. I have to assume my post will go down in flames, but I figured that I might as well take a break from my usual lurker status here and make a few comments. The real story isn't sinister enough for a headline, as is usually the case with these things. As a few others have pointed out, the eBay VeRO program (no comment on that program itself) that is being used to take down e-meter auctions is actually an already established eBay program... It wasn't like "Scientology" was specially given 'direct access to eBay Database' (oh noes!!!!) as the headline claims. As for the e-meter, these are supposed to be for use only by Scientology ministers and ministers-in-training. Regardless of what you think of the e-meter or Scientology, what is happening here is a reasonable effort to protect that use legally. Of course there is no physical way to prevent every sale of a used e-meter to a non-minister, but eBay is a rather high-profile site where people sell used goods. It's quite a stretch to say this has anything to do with censorship, either. Time for the usual disclaimer of 'I am not a lawyer' and also another that I'm not involved in any of these actions officially, I just am commenting based on what I know and have observed. As an aside, I've always found it fascinating how some people will latch on to absolutely anything negative said about Scientology as proven fact and trounce anything positive. I also find it interesting how at least 90% (and I'm being generous here) of the stuff I have read online or in the media about Scientology doesn't even resemble what Scientology really is, and I have been a member for about 17 years now.

  29. Under what legal authority? by PseudoLogic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the "E-Meter" wikipedia link in the summary: "In 1958 when Scientologists Don Breeding and Joe Wallis developed a modified, smaller battery-operated version, which they presented to Hubbard, he again used it. This was christened the Hubbard electrometer. Hubbard patented it on December 6, 1966, as a "Device for Measuring and Indicating Changes in the Resistance of a Human Body" (U.S. Patent 3,290,589 ). The patent is now expired and in the public domain. The Church of Scientology continues to make, sell, and teach its use in auditing." So if the E-Meter is in the public domain, how can they control who resells them?

    --
    Insert witty comment here
  30. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by rootofevil · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
  31. It's just CoS being CoS by realmolo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to the article, the Church of Scientology basically has no legal leg to stand on. Of course, who is going to take them to court? eBay surely doesn't care. And what about the people who are trying to buy used "e-meters"? Well, they are almost surely *Scientologists*! And we all know how the CoS feels about members that get out-of-line. I imagine that if the CoS *ever* caught one of their members buying a used e-meter, they'd make their lives hell.

    . So, really, no harm done all-around, I say.

  32. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is important and it is relevant to the main story, because Co$ victims are often first thought to have committed suicide. There is a direct link between the main story and this news. Co$ is a dangerous cult.

  33. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Hillgiant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Erm, excuse me. What does God need with a starship?

    --
    -
  34. E-meter like a condom by cgfsd · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would equate an E-meter to that of a condom. Two things you would never want to buy used and two things used for screwing people.

  35. Holy crap NO by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given Scientology's record of fraud and abuse, should eBay give them this level of trust?

    The answer is right there. Would you want any group with Scientology's record of fraud and abuse to have access to anything important?

    What do you want to bet they'd pull auctions of other Scientology-questionable stuff that isn't e meters?

    Put a DVD copy of Anonymous' Scientology protests up for sale and watch what happens. What do you want to bet that it winds up deleted? Blocking e meter sales my ass - this is nothing more than some goofy cult making decisions about what you're allowed to buy. Don't let it happen!

    These people are batshit fucking insane. Don't legitimize them by giving them any sort of power, control, or authority whatsoever.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  36. So if these items migrate to Craigslist.... by 8127972 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... What are the odds that these jokers will try to pull the same stunt? Perhaps that's the answer?

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  37. Most important reason: by WolfTheWerewolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... so the CoS can get the name and address of the auction lister, then Fair Game them as they see fit.
    According to eBay's VeRO ToS they will gladly hand this information over.

  38. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by milsoRgen · · Score: 4, Informative

    You must not be very familiar with the space opera that is Scientology. You see it's all about getting the thetans out. I believe they were an ancient race, that Xenu the galactic prince brought to earth 75 million years ago, set near some volcanoes near Hawaii. Then dropped H bombs in said volcanoes, and somehow their spirits latched on to us homo sapiens, and block our natural super powers, caused all our problems... Etc etc etc. I don't think god shows up in the story, but I could be wrong...

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  39. eBay changes search for "emeter" into "exeter" by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's wacky. Try it yourself...
    In the search box type (without quotes) "emeter". If you type it with the quotes, that's different.
    What happens? You perform a search for "exeter"!

    I'm sure it isn't anything sinister, though. A search for "cimputer" is changed into a search for "computer". But it sure is confusing.

  40. Oh well by Protonk · · Score: 2, Funny

    It isn't censorship. It isn't illegal. It is totally within the scope of eBay's user agreements with sellers and buyers. eBay has negotiated an agreement with a large vendor who is interested in preventing the resale of their items. I HAVE to presume that whatever these items are they come with an agreement eliminating the possiblity of resale. They would then fall in to the category of attempting to resell items which have a non-transferrable license. It is totally within their rights to cancel any auction that they feel is outside their TOS. In this case, they have chosen to offload the work on to a more zealous party.

    Just because it is withing their rights doesn't make it a good idea. As a matter of fact, it is a terrible idea. allowing a third party to void auctions without oversight is foolish for a few reasons:

    1. Other large interests see these actions and will want the same treatment, as long as it does not offer significant negative publicity. The fact that ebay is WILLING to offer this service puts them in a bad barganing position with these other firms.

    2. It only means lost revenue for ebay. Presumably, ebay was faced with a legal threat over allowing resale of these items. SOMEHOW, ebay made the determination that compliance was somehow too expensive and have offered to shift the cost of compliance to CoS. CoS does NOT have an incentive to be careful. They have an incentive to overextend their authority because the lost customer is not theirs.

    3. As a corollary, this is like outsourcing your customer service to a motorcycle gang. CoS has every reason to be pernicious, litigious and overbroad. They have NO reason to see gray areas and offer the benefit of the doubt.

    4. Compliance in good faith by ebay would probably not have hazarded a lawsuit. IANAL, but most of these suits stem from what is basically deliberate negligence on the part of the reselling authority (or serving authority). If ebay acts on their own standards they are likely to meet whatever tests exist.

  41. Who cares? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If someone is drinking the Scientology Kool Aid, then does it really matter whether or not they get discounted second hand equipment? If Scientology has their hooks into you they will get your money one way or another.

    What they're really trying to control is the purchase of scientology collectables by non-scientologists.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  42. Completely Misleading by Kashra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course, another completely misleading headline and article summary.

    The VeRO program does not provide direct access to eBay's database to delete items. It is a fast-track for manufacturers to submit deletion requests for items they believe are infringing on their copyrights. Every time an auction is deleted, the VeRO program gives eBay the proper documents holding the manufacturers legally responsible for their claim of copyright infringement.

    Taking a simple look at the program's description reveals that ANY auction being deleted through this program can be reinstated, automatically, by the user, within 10 days. They simply have to do the same thing the manufacturer did: claim legal responsibility for their auction, in writing.

    Now, there's no doubt that I, as a private individual, would never risk challenging the very well funded battery of lawyers the Church of Scientology has to keep me in line. Even though I know they have no leg to stand on, I can't afford the legal battle. But I wouldn't cry that its eBay's fault, when eBay gave me the option to directly challenge the "manufacturer".

    --
    If you can't find a real troll, just mod down whoever you don't agree with!
    1. Re:Completely Misleading by touretzky · · Score: 4, Informative

      eBay's counternotification policy for VeRO takedowns applies only to claims of copyright infringement. (Read the page you linked to.) Scientology is using bogus trademark infringement claims to take down E-meter listings. Therefore, counternotification is not available.

  43. yes of course it is by Quadraginta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    E-Bay is private firm, and they're free to list or not list sales on their site for any reason whatsoever, including because the "Church" of Scientology asserts some utterly bogus intellectual property right, or because they just feel like it.

    The C of S is not "preventing the resale of their product," they're just preventing the resale through E-Bay and with E-Bay's cooperation. You can still put an ad in the paper and sell it, or put up a notice in your neighborhood market, or just walk around town with a sign attached to you saying "E-Meter Cheap!"

    And who gives a shit what the lawyers think? Why should the law be relevant here? This isn't a question you want the lawyers thinking about, because you can be damn sure that any solution they think up is going to cost you far more in cash and personal liberty than you would like to part with. Do you want there to be a law telling you what you can and cannot sell on your personal website? Do you want to have to get your Craigslist ad vetted by the police before it can go up? Do you want the FBI to have the right to interrogate you about whether you sold your pet cat or unused furniture to the right people, and in the right way?

    Christ, let us keep the lawyers in the fridge, OK? If there's a big market for secondhand E-meters, and E-Bay foolishly foregoes it because they want to keep the Scientologists happy, then let someone start up a private website devoted to reselling E-Meters, and he will make scads of money, more than enough to dare the "Church" to sue him, and get their clueless clock cleaned and get hit for beaucoup lawyer fees on top of it.

    But what I suspect is that ex-Scientologists who want to recoup some of the financial loss associated with their recent vacation from rationality are a very small group, and while it kinda sucks that when there's very few of you and a whole lot of someone else (in this case, non-ex-Scientologists, or pre-ex-Scientologists), you have to tread carefully, that's just life in a wide-open democracy. It's not like an intelligent and determined person can't work around this problem fairly easily. I'm sure if I had an E-Meter to sell, I could do it easily enough without E-Bay or the Church getting a clue. Probably my 16-year-old could, too.

  44. Well, I just altered my auctions... by JoshDM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    they now reference the words "e-meter" and "Scientology". That should drive some sales and page views.

  45. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by notnAP · · Score: 4, Informative

    And you must not be very familiar with the space opera that is Star Trek, from which the GP was quoting quite humorously.

  46. I hope that's just blustering... by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Funny

    [L]ast I tried a DOS on eBay for fucking with my mother's account, it only took a mere 5,000 simulataneous requests every ten seconds to DOS them. Err, did you forget to click the Post Anonymously checkbox before admitting to an act which may carry civil and/or criminal penalties?
    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  47. Microsoft vs. the Church of Scientology by touretzky · · Score: 4, Funny

    Q: What's the difference between Microsoft and the Church of Scientology?

    A: One is a wealthy and powerful criminal enterprise bent on world domination, while the other, ah, ummm.... Microsoft has better health benefits.

  48. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by ethanms · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's sad, but I can't stop myself from replying to this obvious nerd bait...... the quote is from Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, not "The Undiscovered Country"

  49. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by milsoRgen · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  50. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by monkeyboythom · · Score: 5, Funny

    I dunno...my girlfriend has religious paraphenalia that needs electricity. I know because when I am in another room, I can hear a buzzing sound in the bedroom and her chanting, "oh, god. oh, god! ohhhhh, gooood!"

    The real question is, since when does your religious paraphernalia need to be be plugged into the wall?
  51. eBay just jumped the shark by wiredlogic · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know the CoS is manned by a bunch of persistent barratrous bastards but it is absolutely ridiculous that eBay would cave into them this way. It's lazy and irresponsible for a company the size of eBay to let CoS have their way once again when they have the resources to fight their crap.

    It's one thing for the scientologists to claim copyright protections on their literature but restricting the sale or e-meters is something they don't have the right to do. E-meters are hard physical items that are subject to the right of first sale doctrine. There is no copyright violation going on with their resale. Likewise, there should be nothing wrong with people reselling original copies of CoS literature provided they aren't bound by a contract that says otherwise.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  52. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by d3ac0n · · Score: 4, Funny

    Argh!

    You are correct. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098382/quotes

    I give myself one geek demerit for picking the wrong movie.

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  53. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You shouldn't talk of things about which you are ignorant.

    There almost certainly was a historical Buddha. There is far more evidence for this, from independent sources, than for (e.g.) Socrates.

    And FYI, the Buddha never said he was anything but a normal man. In fact, he stated again and again that he was just that -- not some kind of a God or superbeing.

  54. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by d3ac0n · · Score: 2, Funny

    LIES! ./ posters don't HAVE girlfriends!

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  55. Another example of the abusive VERO program by gleffler · · Score: 4, Informative

    eBay has long since decided to deputize any company that feels like signing papers with complete and unfettered access to eBay. Anyone that signs a "legally binding document" can then gain power to delete any auction from eBay for whatever reason they feel like. If it's because of counterfeit or provably stolen product, that's fine, but eBay's history of repudiating first sale has really gotten tiring.

    Try reselling Weight Watchers program materials. They get deleted on a regular basis because Weight Watchers doesn't like it if you resell them. There's no legal basis for this, and if you push the issue with eBay, the response you get is "Well, they said they don't want you selling them, so too bad." They tell you to "take it up with Weight Watchers" who says "We say you can't sell them, and that's that."

    VeRO is a bullshit program that lets eBay wash their hands of legitimate issues on the site and that gives companies ridiculously too much power. Do you think that if I set up a stand at a flea market reselling legally acquired materials, that the flea market owners would stand for the publisher of those materials walking around with a rubber hose and yanking the items away if I tried to sell them?

    This isn't news, hopefully this just pushes VeRO into the public eye and convinces eBay to get rid of it, or to force "rights owners" (I wasn't aware that a "right to prevent resale" existed) to actually file individual complaints based on some sort of legal theory to delist an item, not just "We don't want these resold." Scn is abusing it like they abuse everything else, but this system seems to be made specifically to facilitate abuse.

  56. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... to boldly correct what no man had corrected before ... :-)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  57. It's functional? by Tony · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...you could not come close to it's functionality with that original patent's design... Uhm... what functionality is that, exactly? It seems it has one function: to separate fools from their money in the service of richer fools. In that way, it seems to work identically to the 1960's version, only with a cooler name.

    And: it sounds like it was named by an eight-year-old.
    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  58. Fun facts about the e-meter by mitchplanck · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Secrets/E-Meter/ Including how to make your own!

  59. Re:What fraud and abuse? by Cheesey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fraud and abuse? Well, no Scientology discussion can be complete without a link to Bare Faced Messiah, the unauthorised biography of L. Ron Hubbard. It is very interesting stuff. The man lived recently enough that there are plenty of verifiable historical facts about him, and he was certainly an extraordinary guy.

    Any Scientologists reading this topic have no doubt already heard about Bare Faced Messiah and the lies contained within it, invented (of course) by the Church's enemies in order to discredit Hubbard and his ideas. To you I say: what if your perception of reality is wrong? What if you have been lied to, that a sort of Matrix has been built around you by your friends and colleagues at the Church? Wouldn't you at least like to see what other people's reality looks like? No need to take any pills, the truth might be a click away...

    --
    >north
    You're an immobile computer, remember?
  60. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by TrekkieGod · · Score: 3, Funny

    I give myself one geek demerit for picking the wrong movie.

    I hereby smite you.

    --

    Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

  61. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by TobyRush · · Score: 3, Funny

    the quote is from Star Trek V: The Final Frontier

    And therein lies the true wonder... not only did he quote from Star Trek, and not only did he quote Shatner during that intermediate period when he was not cool, but he quoted from ST V, which most consider the worst one ever made.

    That's no nerd, that's an übernerd. We are not worthy.

    --
    Sam! If you will let me be,
    I will try them.
    You will see.
  62. Re:Church by FiloEleven · · Score: 4, Informative

    What *I* really don't get is why people don't just call Scientology for what it is: a sect. Most likely because it isn't a sect; it's a cult. At least, it has more characteristics of a cult than a sect. Sects are groups of people with a certain set of beliefs that have broken off from a parent religion (or cult). Scientology never had a parent, so the term "sect" is a misnomer. Its practices (strict control of its members and its secrecy being the most apparent) closely match those associated with cults. The biggest difference between scientology and your run-of-the-mill cult is its massive size and influence, which is large enough to cause colleges nationwide to rename a class from something like "A Study of Cults" to something like "New Religious Movements" for fear of lawsuits.
  63. Re:Don't tell Chef but.. I'm Buddhist... by davidsyes · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mahayana, to be specific....

    OM-MA-NI-PAD-ME-HUM

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantra

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  64. Re:Church by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A sect? I consider them organized crime.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  65. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 2, Funny

    as far as i am concerned you all have way too much power and are responsible for every war there has ever been

    Cold War. Stalin says hi.

    --
    "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
  66. I talked to my eBay Rep about this... by Mikenotmike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to ebay, like others mentioned in this article, they were given the same access as any other manufacturer, a fast track to Vero so they can get items removed quickly, but it still has to go through Vero. But this isn't to stop the sale of used e-meters most likely, it's to stop the sale of FAKE e-meters, since Scientology has patents on all their bogus devices (http://home.snafu.de/tilman/prolinks/patents.html). Ebay will allows remove listings for unauthorized replica's, it's their policy.

  67. No, *do* laugh at them by edremy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Yes, there is nothing at all funny about the things that Scientology does. But their beliefs *should* be held up for public ridicule, all the more so since they are so damn protective of them. Ridicule is an amazingly powerful tool when engaged in a battle of ideas, and this is at the core a battle of ideas. They want people to think they are some sort of wonderful self help operation that will give you insight into your mind and help you through difficult times. Having a pile of people pointing out what they really believe and laughing at them infuriates them, helps keep the suckers away and defuses their power as a "church".

    Think about the South Park episode that went through the entire theology of the CoS, with a big blinking sign that read "This is what Scientologists actually believe" over the animation. That was even more effective than the "Dum Dum Dum Dum Dum" song refrain about the Mormons, all the more so since there was no attempt at all at the end of the episode to paint actual CoS members as decent human beings, unlike the Mormon episode.

    Laugh at them.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  68. Oh, okay. It's just blustering, after all. by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, I just don't give a fuck. What's the law going to do? I just opened 5,000 various auctions in my Firefox browser and set them to auto-refresh at the same time. The fact that their servers couldn't stand up to a simulation of 5,000 people clicking 'refresh' at the same time doesn't constitute a violation of law. The key word in the sentence is 'TRIED' not 'successfully carried out' My bad. You *attempted* to commit a felony. Didn't mean to ruffle your feathers there, chief.

    In that case, never mind. It's much more likely that you executed a denial of service attack on your *own* machine than on eBay. I mean, you do know that Firefox has an upper limit on how many connections it will actually open at the same time, right? (Go to about:config and filter for "connect.") All other connections are just placed in a queue until Firefox has an available slot. The slowdown was entirely on your own machine and LAN.

    I mean, honestly... Did you really think that you were being some sort of 1337 super-hax0r by using *one* machine on a single home or school connection to bog down one of the largest e-commerce sites on the planet?

    (Oh, also, your proposed Million Loser March is more likely to DoS your proxy service than eBay itself.)

    The law's tried it before anyways. I run rings around them every time, simpyly because most judges aren't smart enough to know what they're trying to charge me for. Sure thing, kid. Keep saying things like that in a public forum. We're all in awe of your brilliance and eagerly await to see the way in which your intellect would dazzle the courtroom.
    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  69. Well if you ask me by waffledoodle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    [This comment removed due to a copyright claim by Church of Scientology International]

  70. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    The problem with "WWCBND?" is that it's just not a terribly useful guiding philosophy. For instance, imagine you're in a situation where you're having trouble getting along with your coworkers, and so you ask yourself, "WWCBND?" The answer is that CowboyNeal would sit on a couch, eat Pringles, and play video games. So, as you can see, "WWCBND?" has two major problems:

    First, the solution is *always* to sit on a couch, eat Pringles, and play video games because that's all we know about CowboyNeal. "WWCBND?" dictates that you sit on a couch, eat Pringles, and play video games in any situation, whether it's marital problems, dealing with the poor, or feeling frustrated that you dropped your grilled cheese sandwich: just sit on a couch, eat some Pringles, and play video games. It's just not very flexible as a philosophy.

    The second issue with the "WWCBND?" philosophy is more practical. CowboyNeal is a fat slob. As a fat slob, he already has the resources to follow through with this plan, in particular, he has a couch, lots of Pringles, and plenty of video games to play. Unless you have access to similar resources, "WWCBND?" is just not practical to apply to your everyday life. Although I admit, when I think of how to deal with the fact that I too am a fat slob, and then ask "WWCBND?", I have to admit that the philosophy does have some appeal.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  71. Re:Church by emilper · · Score: 5, Funny

    no, it's a sect, a split from the Church of "Astounding Stories".

  72. It gets funnier, much funnier... by milsoRgen · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want a good laugh, these 2 sites offer a run down on their beliefs:

    http://www.xenu.net/
    http://www.xs4all.nl/~kspaink/fishman/index2.html

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  73. Open letter to eBay by chord.wav · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear eBay,
    Get some balls.

    Sincerely,
    Me

  74. Re:Don't tell Chef but.. I'm Buddhist... by edittard · · Score: 3, Funny

    Padme yum? I can't disagree.

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  75. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by d3ac0n · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hereby smite you.


    What does a TrekkieGod need with a...

    Oh, nevermind.
    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  76. E-Bay has been doing this since 1998! by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is the same thing that eBay has been doing since they killed my auctions in 1998.

    You see, Microsoft wanted to engage in illegal price fixing, and killed my auctions reselling copies of Microsoft software that I had won as door prizes.

    I had never agreed to a license agreement, so I was not bound by it, but eBay still allowed Microsoft to kill my auctions.

    It was only after I won my small-claims lawsuit against eBay for breech of contract, and another small claims court suit against Microsoft for slander that I got another eBay account. That's why my account says "since 1999."

    Anyway, great job hopping on this story 9 years later, /.

    Andy

  77. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by spun · · Score: 5, Informative

    What is your problem? The Fishman Affidavit is a court document, that's not a good enough cite for you that L. Ron Hubbard actually said that Jesus likes little boys? Or did you not bother to read (or not comprehend) the website and assumed the poster was bashing your favorite fairy tale?

    Let me be perfectly clear then: Scientology makes the claim, in their official religious literature, that Jesus was a homosexual pedophile. That is backed up by court records.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  78. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by eclectic4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Correct.

    And things like rising from an untimely death after being nailed to a cross (or tree) three days after dying (and then celebrating), having a last supper, being born of a virgin, being the son of a god, etc... were all prevalent beliefs of pagan mythology at the time of and well before Jesus. A guy who had these "myths" thrown upon his name decades after he was dead in order to start a religion.

    People forget that the history of most religions are far more "earth-bound" than they like to realize...

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  79. E-Meter? Ha! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

    An E-Meter is no match for the "Church of Jobs" iMeter!

  80. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know... sitting on a couch, eating Pringles, and playing video games has never caused wars or anything. The world would be a better place if people followed CowboyNeal's fine example.

  81. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Funny

    He thinks he has a girlfriend, but in reality he is supporting a woman and her B.O.B.
    Frog blast the vent core!
  82. Re:Hill v. Scientology by debrain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I clicked the link you provided, but can't read through it all. Help out an ADD brother: which party was awarded how much damage? Has it been enforced? Summary:
    A lawyer working for the Church of Scientology stood on the steps of a courthouse in fancy lawyer gowns and said they were going to commence a criminal contempt proceeding against a Crown (State) attorney. This violated the ethical guidelines of the lawyer, threatened an officer of the State, and impugned the credibility of that officer and of the judicial system itself.

    The attorney and CoS were fined $300,000 each, and CoS $500,000 in aggravated damages and $800,000 in punitive damages.

    I would presume this has been enforced. The CoS is still operating just down the street from where I work.

  83. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 3, Funny

    The answer is that CowboyNeal would sit on a couch The What Would Tom Cruise Do (WWTCD) ideology would dictate you *jump* on the couch. In any situation.

    ~Jarik
  84. Re:Why Isn't There...? by Babu+'God'+Hoover · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ebay is a legal party to transactions via it's site. A site allowing anything goes sales can only charge a 'publishing fee'. Craig's list doesn't charge anything so there's no way to compete.

    Yes, you could set up a pay to advertise or pay to view site for craig's list prohibited stuff like Nazi, gun, COS, shrunken head, stars and bars,... but most of this already gets traded in aficionado forums. Perhaps one of the COS related forums has a 'swapmeet' page. If not, it's likely the best place to make sale on an e-meter.

    IMO L-Ron wasn't even original. His quackery is much in the style of Edgar Cayce. Maybe COS needs all those lawyers to fend off these guys?

  85. Re:Church by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I want to know about Christianity, I can buy a Bible. I could even get free bibles if I know where to look. I could find a million different people preaching about the religion. I could find people who would be head over heals to go in depth about their beliefs for absolutley no money. I could sell a Bible on eBay and the pope isn't going to delete it. On the other hand, Scientology offers nothing except a promise of enlightment for a large sum of money. They don't follow through and have so much against them legally and morally that it is sophomoric to compare them to a real religion. Say what you want about religion, but a true religion is open (like most major religions) and a cult is closed (like Scientology). Taking jabs at mainstream religion is childish and ignores the real issues. And finally, Christianity's largest atrocities occured centuries ago, the stuff Scientology has done is completely out of place for the 20th and 21st century. I'm not trying to defend Christianity out of zealotry (I do not practice Christianity or Judaism, the two religions of my parents, although I do believe in God), I'm defending it because in this day and age it is a respectful religion to follow and one that isn't based around money, crime and tax breaks. Sure, one may not agree with some views but those views are open book. Scientology won't tell you their views because they are idiotic. All the stuff we know about Xenu is from leaks. Scientology never volunteered that information, and for a good reason. Until you are brainwashed, it sounds like pure BS.

  86. Re:Not long now by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean like when they [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]?

  87. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by AoT · · Score: 2

    Except for the great couch war of aught five. That sure was a doozy.

  88. Innaccurate info from original, anonymous poster by Schlage · · Score: 2, Informative

    The summary states that "The Church of Scientology can delete auctions from eBay with no supervision under the VeRO program," but even according to the linked article this is not the case. The removals are taking place through the VeRO program, they're just contending that the removals are frivolous. As if that weren't enough, the title states that Scientology has been given direct access to the database. Going from frivolous removals to unfettered access to eBay's DB is a pretty ridiculous leap, and seems disengenous on the part of the original poster.

    Having once worked at eBay (I quit in late '07) in association with people on the VeRO team, I can tell you that direct access to the DB is not required to get an item off the site very quickly; it is quite easy for rights-holders to get items they claim to be infringing removed... all it takes is a single qualifying complaint (per item while I was there, but they may allow lists now).

    A couple of notes about VeRO compaints, however:

    1- The complaint is made under penalty of perjury, which creates some potential for liability for frivolous or incorrect complaints on the part of the complainant (potentially difficult to take legal action on, but present).
    2- It is a complaint of IP (Intellectual Property) infringement, not simply copyright infringement. That's why items that are sold from an organization for a specific use, and whose resale is legally limited, can be said to infringe if they are being used/sold in a way inconsistent with the IP owner's wishes.
    3- There is an appeals process, and the item can potentially get put back on the site.

    For an overview of the process, you can go to this page eBay provides to explain it: http://pages.ebay.com/help/tp/vero-rights-owner.html

    If you'd like to see a copy of the notice that VeRO members (registered IP owners) must send to get things removed, then download this PDF (also linked from the priorly mentioned page): http://pages.ebay.com/help/community/NOCI1.pdf

  89. Scientology Paraphanelia by dexomn · · Score: 2

    It would be better for everyone if they didn't allow ANY of this garbage to be sold on ebay.

  90. Re:Don't tell Tom but by Justabit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There must be alot of dissalusioned ex members in Sydney cause we get them in our second hand store all the time. Lots of fun to play with the trick being to adjust your squeeze while looking at the meter. From what i can tell its just a fancy galvanic skin response meter that is heighly tunable. If you want to use it semi seriously you could see your reaction to questions you ask yourself, self diagnosis with a bit of force feedback. If you want to have fun with the poor meter drivers on open days that they have, think of horrible things when they ask you about your relationship with your kids, and nice things.. etc. Either way its an excellent device for practicing lying and therefor acting, no wonder TC and JT are into it. We have 1 or 2 regular buyers who get them all, no questions asked. Could be higher ups who dont want to make a fuss.

    --
    "Persistance is Fertile" - Me. I can quote myself if I want to.
  91. FOLLOWUP TO "Well, I just altered my auctions..." by JoshDM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Heh. My auction page views actually have skyrocketed from 5 to 100 in just a few hours. Search for "E-meter"; I'm the one selling comic books.

  92. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Informative

    homosexual pedophile

    the correct word here is "pederast", however, your words will do as some people wouldn't know what pederasty was unless they actually went and looked it up...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  93. Good News Everyone! by dintech · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can just imagine a modern day equivalent:

    Zealot: Hey Hubbard, check this out...
    Hubbard: What is it?
    Zealot: It's a new device, I call it the e-meter!
    Hubbard: Whats-it-do daddy-o?
    Zealot: Well, it's actually a modified client for a popular bandwidth test except this one measures your 'theaton level'! Hehe.
    Hubbard: Wow! We can just send this client out as a world-wide spam-blanket and no more need for street canvasing! We'll be rich, rich, RICH!
    Zealot: Mwuhah... oh no! I've just thought of a problem.
    Hubbard: Oh? What's that? People won't be convinced by their super-high theaton level and immediately sign up for our brochure? We won't be able to stop re-distribution of beta versions on ebay? We can't use them to zap unbelievers into submission with? You look positively deflated my friend...
    Zealot: Mmmm, no.... half of America is on Comcast...
    Hubbard: Haha! Fear not my little novice, haven't you heard of PowerBoost?
    Zealot: Mwuhahahaa...
    Hubbard: Mwuhahahaa...
    Zealot: Mwuhahahaa...
    Hubbard: Mwuhahahaa...
    ...

  94. VERO is pretty much useless by rjwoodhead · · Score: 2, Informative

    Allow me to speak from experience - VERO is pretty much useless as a method for evil companies to enforce despotic control over the masses. In terms of furthering my nefarious plans for World Domination, it's been a total bust.

    EBay hosts many auctions of bootlegs of many of the films (anime, samurai stuff) for which my company, AnimEigo, is the US licensor (turning you all into malleable Otaku will definitely get me closer to the aforementioned end-state of World Domination). At one point, we tried using VERO to cancel these auctions. It was a total waste of time.

    1) After being VERO'd, the bootleg vendor would simply put up another auction. It was a game of whack-a-mole, and they had more time to play than I did. The time I wasted -- I could have spent it on the Orbital Mind Control Lasers.

    2) The serious bootleg vendors would simply contest the VERO. At which point the rights-holder has to provide documentation that demonstrates that the property infringes their rights. And that, folks, takes time and money -- and I need that money, do you guys have any idea how expensive it is to build and maintain a Secret Lair?

    So my advice to people who want to sell E-Meters is to contest the VERO; it requires only 10 minutes of your time filling out a form and faxing it off, and will cost the COS a considerable amount of money to take to the next step. Now, they may decide that it's worth it to them to do that, but hey, that's money they can't spend on other things - and keep in mind that for them, World Domination is a serious business, not just a hobby like it is for me.

    The real point of VERO is to protect eBay from lawsuits by rights-holders.

    --
    "World Domination - a fun, family activity"
  95. I am sorry. by xtracto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I also find it interesting how at least 90% (and I'm being generous here) of the stuff I have read online or in the media about Scientology doesn't even resemble what Scientology really is, and I have been a member for about 17 years now.

    I am sorry for you my friend. I would suggest you see the story of people who where in Scientology for more than 20 years and were even "OT7" (whatever that means). Of course, I do not know if your church allows you to see such videos. (I would not count on that.. In fact i am surprised that your CoS nanny filter allows you to get into slashdot.

    Do not get me wrong, I have nothing about the Scientology religion, it is the "church" the one I think is bad. Similarly to how the Catholic church was bad some years ago (Spanish Incquisition). I know there are groups of people that follow the same beliefs as Scientologists, but they cannot call themselves Scientologists because they would get sued (WTF?).

    And, lastly, just for curiosity, do you *really* believe in Xenu and all those things described in OT3 ?

    Hope you the best! And I really hope you remember my post in some 10 years when you get out of Scientology and look back at all the years you wasted.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  96. Xenu is a good guy, and he loves you! by jameskojiro · · Score: 2, Funny

    The CoS is a nothing more than a disinformation campaign by people opposed to the Galactic rule of Xenu.

    They use blatant lies about Xenu to build thier base up.

    The aliens Xenu sent to their firey doom weren't just ordinary citizens, they were Galactic Welfare recipients and they were a complete and total drain on the Galactic Tax system. These Aliens were given several chances to get off the welfare system and were all able to work. Xenu had them gathered up and sent to processing, they downloaded their minds into a giant computer where they could spend their eternity living off free Galactic government cheese. But what to do with their bodies? Well Xenu checked and some life bearing planets were facing peril in that they were losing carbon in their biospheres, one such planet Earth needed extra carbon, so they dropped off the brain dead bodies in volcaoes so that any any alien microbes would be sterilized and the carbon would enter the air and thus the carbon cycle. Xenu is so kind to think of us!

    The Galactic Communist party was pissed off because their lost a great deal of their voting base (the welfare recipients). Since citizens who have been virtialized only have 1/4 of a vote. So they have agents spreading lies so when Earth joins the Galactic government there are seeds of mistrust against the duly elected Galactic President Xenu who has won in landslide victory after landslide victory and is now in his 1,345,236th term in office. LRH was a recruited by an agent to spread mistrust of Xenu.

    It's all down to politics folks.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...