Slashdot Mirror


Drug Reverses Retardation In Mice

snydeq writes "Rapamycin, a medication doctors prescribe to transplant patients to prevent organ rejection, has been used to reverse learning disorders and mild retardation associated with TSC (tuberous sclerosis complex) in mice. Because the condition is linked to autism, scientists believe the drug may be used to treat learning disabilities and short-term memory deficits in all kinds of autism as well. The scientists chose rapamycin after they realized the drug regulates one of the same proteins that the TSC gene does, just in different parts of the body. 'What was surprising is that we could give rapamycin to adult mice and reverse their condition,' said neurobiologist Alcino Silva of the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. 'We did not know ... that this drug would be equally effective for the learning disabilities as it is for tissue rejection.' Rapamycin treatment leveled the playing field between normal and TSC mice in as little as three days."

318 comments

  1. flowers for algernon by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    make sure it doesn't wear off after a little while

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:flowers for algernon by Helmholtz · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it becomes permanent, then you've got the Rats (or Mice) of NIMH. ;)

      --
      RFC2119
    2. Re:flowers for algernon by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      It turns them into Nickel Metal Hydride? Hmm, that makes a fully mouse operated home generator/backup system more feasible when you can use the brainy mice as batteries while their slightly moronic brethren run around on wheels all day.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:flowers for algernon by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      It turns them into Nickel Metal Hydride?

      close:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stainless_Steel_Rat

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    4. Re:flowers for algernon by jeffasselin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seriously. I read that book 15 years ago and it still stands out in my mind how sad the degradation is. It is one of my worst nightmare to eventually lose my reasoning capacities.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    5. Re:flowers for algernon by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seriously. I read that book 15 years ago and it still stands out in my mind how sad the degradation is. It is one of my worst nightmare to eventually lose my reasoning capacities.

      LOL! ME 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    6. Re:flowers for algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the funniest comments ever!

    7. Re:flowers for algernon by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

      As funny as this?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    8. Re:flowers for algernon by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My wife's grandfather had Parkinson's disease. As his disease progressed, his body gave out more and more. In addition to that, his mind slowly unwound as well. One day he would be perfectly lucid. The next, he would be talking to me about a "yesterday" that was really twenty years ago. It was sad to watch him slowly sink away physically and mentally. I'm still not sure which is worse, but I hope that I never have to experience that myself (or have any of my close loved ones go through that). I'd rather have a quick, painless death (at a ripe, old age, of course) than lingering for years losing everything that makes up "me".

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    9. Re:flowers for algernon by FingerSoup · · Score: 0

      Rats? I hate rats! They make me crazy. Crazy? I used to be crazy, Then they locked me up and put me in a rubber room. Rubber room? I hate Rubber rooms! They're full of Rats. Rats? I hate rats! They make me crazy. Crazy? I used to be crazy, Then they locked me up and put me in a rubber room. Rubber room? I hate Rubber rooms! They're full of Rats. Rats? I hate rats! They make me crazy. Crazy? I used to be crazy, Then they locked me up and put me in a rubber room. Rubber room? I hate Rubber rooms! They're full of Rats. Rats? I hate rats! They make me crazy. Crazy? I used to be crazy, Then they locked me up and put me in a rubber room. Rubber room? I hate Rubber rooms! They're full of Rats....

      (Where are those pills?)

      Rats? I hate rats! They make me crazy. Crazy? I used to be crazy, Then they locked me up and put me in a rubber room. Rubber room? I hate Rubber rooms! They're full of Rats. Rats? I hate rats! They make me crazy. Crazy? I used to be crazy, Then they locked me up and put me in a rubber room. Rubber room? I hate Rubber rooms! They're full of Rats. Rats? I hate rats! They make me crazy. Crazy? I used to be crazy, Then they locked me up and put me in a rubber room. Rubber room? I hate Rubber rooms! They're full of Rats. Rats? I hate rats! They make me crazy. Crazy? I used to be crazy, Then they locked me up and put me in a rubber room. Rubber room? I hate Rubber rooms! They're full of Rats....

    10. Re:flowers for algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I love this place... (yeah, I'm a dork).

      "Flowers for Algernon" was one of my favorite stories back in school (as was _Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH_ mentioned in a followup. Though the stories were hugely popular, no one in my work group has even heard of them. My co-workers literally (and I know what "literally" means) laugh at me for reading and for having read, you know, books.

    11. Re:flowers for algernon by Helmholtz · · Score: 2, Informative

      LOL! ... No, that would be NiMH, not NIMH. ;)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mrs._Frisby_and_the_Rats_of_NIMH

      --
      RFC2119
    12. Re:flowers for algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! ME 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      First time in months a /. comment has made me laugh out loud.

    13. Re:flowers for algernon by monopole · · Score: 3, Funny

      We could then jack them into a "matrix" of batteries while feeding them a VR version of reality. That is until the NEO mouse evolves.

    14. Re:flowers for algernon by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Rescue Aid Society would probably send out a team (possibly with an old Powerbook) before Neo finished buying all his virtual monochrome CRTs (cheese rendering tubes) off of eBay.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    15. Re:flowers for algernon by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      it was tough for you, but I've always wondered what the experience is like for the person suffering the decline. How aware are they of the decline? Him talking to you about yesterday was sad for you because it brought up the realization that his faculties were degrading. But for him? He was retelling an anecdote, and likely unaware of the decline (at least at the time). I suspect things would get more and more confusing, especially if when lucid he would realize what's occurring.

    16. Re:flowers for algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drink some cough syrup and find that it is a major intellectual exercise to figure out how to walk to the bathroom.

      Confusion. Retardation in a bottle.

    17. Re:flowers for algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My parent's own an assisted living facility for people with mental problems. I avoid that place like the plague, because my greatest fear is that I might lose the power to think, and be like the residents.

      It creeps me right the hell out because how would you know? Knowing that you could once think but can't anymore would be even worse.

      I could stand losing almost everything I have, but the use of my mind and, to a lesser extent, my body are things I don't think I want to live without.

      captcha: paranoia. You bet I'm paranoid about it.

    18. Re:flowers for algernon by pwainwright · · Score: 1

      It creeps me right the hell out because how would you know?

      Reminds me of a little rhyme my Dad taught me:

      See the happy moron,
      He doesn't give a damn.
      I wish I were a moron,
      My God... Perhaps I am!

    19. Re:flowers for algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lulz, Flowers for Algernon.

    20. Re:flowers for algernon by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      It's bad. Imagine every person in your life, constantly acting conspiratorial and weird around you. Loved ones no longer being around, or people refusing to let you see them, or telling you that they've been long dead. It's a living hell for a lot of people.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    21. Re:flowers for algernon by Phydeaux314 · · Score: 1

      Need a "+/- 1 Infinite Loop" moderation option.

      --
      Never underestimate the stupidity inherent in all human beings.
    22. Re:flowers for algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking NiMH (note the lowercase 'i'). GP was referring to NIMH (uppercase 'i'), more specifically to Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH.

    23. Re:flowers for algernon by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      That is until the NEO mouse evolves.

      Will a bluetooth mouse work with this Neo?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    24. Re:flowers for algernon by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      We could then jack them into a "matrix" of batteries while feeding them a VR version of reality. That is until the NEO mouse evolves.

      Here's a mouse in Near Earth Orbit.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    25. Re:flowers for algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, rush tons of this stuff to DC. Congressmen = mostly lawyers = rats. Maybe they could pass a few sensible laws while the effect lasts.

    26. Re:flowers for algernon by FingerSoup · · Score: 1

      I was leaning for a perfect example of why this kind of drug is needed. My joke was totally retarded :P

    27. Re:flowers for algernon by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yes I know, I was making a "joke". The capital I was unfortunate but for the purposes of cheese related humour I chose to ignore it.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  2. Cool! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great!!! Now how can we get this drug out to 80% of the population quickly enough?

    1. Re:Cool! by lena_10326 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Great!!! Now how can we get this drug out to 80% of the population quickly enough?

      Your estimate is high. Only 50.7% require it.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_US_presidential_election

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    2. Re:Cool! by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest that we put it in the water coolers in the House of Representatives and the Senate, for BOTH sides of the aisle.

    3. Re:Cool! by archkittens · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest that we put it in the water coolers in the House of Representatives and the Senate, for BOTH sides of the aisle.

      and that way you know anyone who's still retarded later drinks bottled water. I'd settle for just giving it to all MBA's and law students on graduation.

    4. Re:Cool! by KiloByte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your estimate is high. Only 50.7% require it.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_US_presidential_election


      Uhm, wrong. Both parties consist mostly of criminals (lobbying = corruption, even if by the book it is legal). And both parties vote against public good. The populicrats just prefer the copyright mafia, robbing taxpayers and so on.

      The few honest politicians can be found in both parties.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    5. Re:Cool! by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

      Not sure i can name a single honest politician...Jmmy Carter probably is the closest but I am sure he would say he has lied at some point.

    6. Re:Cool! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      DON'T give it to politicians - imagine how much more effectivly they'll be able to lie, cheat and steal if they smarten up!!!!

      And stop feeding it to the frigging mice - do you really want mice that are smart enough to avoid mouse traps?

    7. Re:Cool! by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sadly, it won't work. Although you were joking, I uncharacteristically jumped straight to TFA on this one, as my oldest daughter's IQ measures at 65. That's about five points lower than Forest Gump, if I remember the movie correctly.

      Sadly, this treatment only fights Darwin. TFA says

      Scientists used rapamycin--a medication doctors prescribe to patients who have had transplants to prevent their bodies from rejecting the new organs--to treat learning disorders associated with a disease called tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) in mice. TSC is a rare genetic disorder that causes brain tumors, seizures, learning disabilities, skin lesions and kidney tumors in the 50,000 Americans and one million people worldwide who have the disease.

      A million people might not seem rare, but consider that there are six billion people on the planet. From a link from TFA:

      What is Tuberous Sclerosis?

      Tuberous sclerosis (TSC) is a rare genetic disease that causes benign tumors to grow in the brain and on other vital organs such as the kidneys, heart, eyes, lungs, and skin. It commonly affects the central nervous system. In addition to the benign tumors that frequently occur in TSC, other common symptoms include seizures, mental retardation, behavior problems, and skin abnormalities. TSC may be present at birth, but signs of the disorder can be subtle and full symptoms may take some time to develop. Three types of brain tumors are associated with TSC: cortical tubers, which generally form on the surface of the brain; subependymal nodules, which form in the walls of the ventricles (the fluid-filled cavities of the brain); and giant-cell astrocytomas, a type of tumor that can block the flow of fluids within the brain.

      Most mental retardation is caused by injury.

      A bit offtopic, but the US public school system, bad as it is for average (IQ 100) kids, it fails miserably for both "special" and "gifted" students; my youngest's IQ is 131 and she wound up dropping out (later getting her GED and now manages a GameStop store at age 21) while the oldest graduated high school an got her diploma but lives on SSI disability.

      The US public school system is badly broken.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    8. Re:Cool! by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      That's OK, only retards pay $1 a bottle from something that comes out of the tap for a couple pennies.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:Cool! by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Funny

      Great!!! Now how can we get this drug out to 80% of the population quickly enough?

      Put it in expensive bottled water.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    10. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitter Democrat voters are so cute. Just as clueless as Republican voters but definitely much cuter.

    11. Re:Cool! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should just put it in the beer at the next NASCAR race.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:Cool! by camperslo · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest that we put it in the water coolers in the House of Representatives and the Senate, for BOTH sides of the aisle.

      Just be sure there's still some left to send to Fox network.

    13. Re:Cool! by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      Feingold.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    14. Re:Cool! by archkittens · · Score: 2, Funny

      no.. but i want a mouse who's smart enough to save humanity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mighty_Mouse

    15. Re:Cool! by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Tell your kid to reach higher than they are already doing. I have an IQ of 130 myself and I barely got my high school diploma and I didn't continue with college or university because I went to their "open enrollment" before and I thought the subjects were a bit too simple for me (I've apparently read through some of the textbooks they showed me on my own when I was in 10th grade).

      So I just started my career as a tech support, built up, now I'm an Systems Analyst/Programmer in a University managing the IT for 3 departments and earning a fairly decent salary (for being in a non-profit, research-only department) and I like my job (that might also have to do with the ultimate freedom to do whatever I want with a computing cluster and an electronics lab)

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    16. Re:Cool! by Neeperando · · Score: 5, Funny
      Maybe we can use that to our advantage. We should have nominated a puppy for president instead of Obama.

      Press: What's your plan to make health care affordable for all Americans?

      Candidate Puppy (chews on tennis ball, chases tail): Woof!

      Voters: Awwwwww!

      --
      Being a computer scientist means you tell people how computers should work, not that you know how they actually work.
    17. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or 95% of slashdot readers?

    18. Re:Cool! by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      And to CNN, and MSNBC, and CBS, and...and...well you get my point.

    19. Re:Cool! by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should just put it in the beer at the next NASCAR race.

      I'd love to see the attendance delta after that one.

    20. Re:Cool! by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      (later getting her GED and now manages a GameStop store at age 21) while the oldest graduated high school an got her diploma but lives on SSI disability.

      Sometimes it takes some life experience (a job) for someone to better appreciate school.. perhaps she may still go to college.. I also knew someone who was on SSI for some mental health issues, and her life was not exactly easy.. it takes quite a bit of work to keep those benefits. It's a depressing existence (and depression was one of the things she was being treated for), wouldn't wish it on anyone.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    21. Re:Cool! by hellfire · · Score: 1

      my youngest's IQ is 131 and she wound up dropping out (later getting her GED and now manages a GameStop store at age 21) while the oldest graduated high school an got her diploma but lives on SSI disability.

      This is getting further off topic, and this isn't a flame, but I'm genuinely curious. I have an IQ of 131, finished high school, finished college, and have a decent job. Those with an IQ of 131 are not typically candidates for dropping out of high school. I've always looked at schools currently as failing to prepare US kids to go to college or get a job, and I might be unusual in that I'm not only very emotionally stable and strong, but I'm an aggressive "go getter", but a kid with IQ of 131 and no major emotional or psychological issues should be able to graduate high school and get a diploma. I.E. if she's smart, she can plod thru stupid classes and get a diploma, which looks better than a GED. Also, if she can get a diploma with an IQ of 131 she can usually attend community college. You also seem to be implying that she's smart but could not get thru high school for some reason or another. Also, the one living on SSI disability. It sounds like she hurt herself or has a physical impairment which makes it difficult to work, is that true? Are you in an economically depressed area? Do your daughters have special needs? Are they so bored with classes that their average is a D?

      We're getting off base here, and I agree the education system needs some serious overhaul, but I've never heard of a smart kid with no other major obstacles drop out of high school rather than finish. I geniunely ask in the hopes I get a bit of an education on the topic myself :)

      --

      "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    22. Re:Cool! by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Sadly, this treatment only fights Darwin.

      We have been fighting Darwin for quite some time. Note the sub-replacement fertility in industrialized nations.

      There have been a number of explanations for the general decline in fertility rates in much of the world, and the true explanation is almost certainly a combination of different factors. The growth of wealth and human development are undoubtedly related to this phenomenon.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    23. Re:Cool! by Khisanth+Magus · · Score: 1

      I'd vote for it. Wouldn't be any worse than the other candidates this election.

    24. Re:Cool! by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      Puppy for President !

    25. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of us went through the public school system, and we know it's broken douchebag.

    26. Re:Cool! by k_187 · · Score: 1

      You realize that there are more college educated NASCAR fans than un-high school educated ones, right?

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    27. Re:Cool! by billcopc · · Score: 0, Troll

      I hate replying to ACs, they're all trolls!

      Anyway, there's nothing dumb about dropping out of school, _if_ it's done for the right reasons.

      1. The North American school systems are garbage, they even fail at instilling basic discipline and respect.

      2. These days you can't get shit with most college/uni degrees anyway. Experience trumps education every time.

      3. Money, contrary to what many believe, is not the key to happiness. I would gladly take a pay cut to work a job that's more in-line with my own interests. The "fun" lost from not being about to buy as much crap, would be replaced and surpassed by fun on the job.

      4. People with high IQ are always expected to be visionaries and change the world overnight. Sure, maybe if I dedicated 24 hours a day to finding the cure for Americanism, I might actually find it one day. Guess what ? I don't wanna. I'm way happier poking at computers all day long, using perhaps one-tenth of my mental capacity for work, another 1% for replying to AC trolls on /., and the remainder for my own enjoyment.

      Y'know what ? Maybe the GP's daughter actually likes what she's doing, and thus the GameStop job gets her what she wants: money, and games. Hell, I used to run a computer store; it let me make money doing what I do, and gave me the time and resources to build the most ridiculous PCs for kicks. Plus I had plenty of time to flame people on /.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    28. Re:Cool! by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the survey that concluded this is skewed. They failed to adjust for the large number of uneducated NASCAR fans who, when surveyed, responded with "Fuck your survey, college boy!"

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    29. Re:Cool! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      my youngest's IQ is 131 and she wound up dropping out (later getting her GED and now manages a GameStop store at age 21)

      Can I have her number?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    30. Re:Cool! by cHiphead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are right, both parties consist of mostly criminals, but at least the Democrat pols can pretend to give a shit about people beneath them.

      Cheers.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    31. Re:Cool! by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      now manages a GameStop

      Does she know when the new Battletoads is being released for the Wii?

      --
      Fnord.
    32. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably drools less than Old Man McCain too.

    33. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both parties consist mostly of criminals (lobbying = corruption, even if by the book it is legal).

      Sorry, but you're contradicting yourself. Legal is the opposite of criminal.

      If something is legal, then (by definition) it is not criminal.

    34. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you live that only 50.7% of the population is not mentally handicap?

    35. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make a neckbeard seeking pill.

    36. Re:Cool! by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      She's planning on college with a major in music. That's my fault, I'm afraid; I play guitar. When the kids were little I'd start playing and they'd run into the room I was in and plop down on the floor making requests. "Play the one about our eyes!"

      See, I'd change the lyrics so that the songs were about them. Leila (the oldest) has always been terrified of storms. She had the uncanny ability to predict the weather. If it was going to rain, she would know when to within twenty minutes. I have no idea how she did this.

      Patty's brown eyes, they seem to me
      Remind me of childhood memories
      When everything was as big as a bright blue sky
      Now and then when I see her face
      It takes me away to that special place
      And if I stay too long
      I'll prob'ly break down and cry

      Oh, Sweet child o' mine
      Oh, Sweet child o' mine

      Leila's got eyes like the bluest skies
      As if they're gonna rain
      I'd hate to look into those eyes
      And see an ounce of pain
      Her hair reminds me of a warm safe place
      Where I couold go and hide
      I pray for the thunder
      And the rain
      To quietly pass her by

      Damn, I get misty thinking about it.

      I'm afraid I'm responsible for GameStop, too - I played Quake and Quake II and all sorts of other games with them on the computers I had networked together. Patty was a Jazz Jackrabbit fan, and one day she came to me wide eyed, "Dad, I didn't know you were famous!" It seems a fan of my old Springfield Fragfest web site ran across her playing Jazz Jackrabbit and was awe-struck that he'd met my daughter. Patty was awe-struck that game developers knew me online. One of the visual artists from Jazz Jackrabbit sent her a portrait of her as a rabbit.

      She has a natural affinity for music, though. She can pick up a piece of sheet music she's never heard, pick up her clarinet and just start playing. I'm in awe of her.

      Both of them are "Daddy's Girls". Their mom left us when they were teenagers.

      There's nothing better than parenthood. I waited to have kids, my advice to young people is DON'T WAIT. Just do it.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    37. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hmmmm... So you prefer someone to lie to you "Yes, I love you"

      rather than someone telling you straight to your face "I hate you"

      I prefer honesty so I know who I 'm dealing with.

    38. Re:Cool! by sorak · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest that we put it in the water coolers in the House of Representatives and the Senate, for BOTH sides of the aisle.

      Then they'd realize what they've been doing these past several years and commit mass suicide. What are you, some kind of terrorist?

    39. Re:Cool! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Of course, they use *my* money to do the pretending. Pass.

    40. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I hate replying to ACs, they're all trolls!"

      Surprising - you couldn't refute my argument without a personal attack. Quite a debater you are!

      "Money, contrary to what many believe, is not the key to happiness. I would gladly take a pay cut to work a job that's more in-line with my own interests. The "fun" lost from not being about to buy as much crap, would be replaced and surpassed by fun on the job."

      I never brought up money, at all - you fucking imbecile. I said that education gives you opportunities and choices. If you drop out of high school and have no college degree, the choices available to you are severely limited. I won't bother with the rest of your nonsense except to say that I hope you feel better having called me a troll and have a great day!

    41. Re:Cool! by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      Except when they throw tantrums, as in the first Bush election

      Gore won - he did! Look at my chads - wooo hoo!

      So's your mom!

    42. Re:Cool! by whyareallthenamestak · · Score: 1

      Why do people keep bringing up that example. It's not all about price. I can't stand how my tap water tastes that's why I buy bottled water. My parents have great tap water which I can drink. Stop making generalizations.

    43. Re:Cool! by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      Thank you, if I am elected this is what I will do:

      I'll cut your tax in half
      I'll make the Russians laugh
      I'll feed the hungry people everywhere.

      I'll bring the railroads back
      New trains and new track
      From Waikiki to old Delaware.

      Vote for me, vote for me
      I want the nomination for the Presidency
      Vote for me, vote for me
      If I am elected, this is how it will be.

      I'll give Detroit one year
      New cars that run on beer
      Or anything except gasoline.

      Lyrics from Chicago "Vote for Me"

    44. Re:Cool! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      There were emotional issues. Her mother left us when the youngest was 15 and her sister was 17. On top of that there was an assistant Principal who very obviously hated white people and females; in fact the asshole was fired after a lot of kids (all of them white girls who had previously done very well in school) dropped out. She plans on college now, and is engaged to be married to a guy I firmly approve of.

      The oldest is autistic. The psychiatrist we saw for family counseling after my ex-wife left us got her on SSI. The oldest just turned 23, the youngest is 21.

      My dad always said "one 'oh, shit!' wipes out a lof of 'attaboys'", it only takes one or two bad teachers or administrators to screw up a kid's life. It needs to be a lot easier to get rid of bad teachers and principals than it currently is. Teaching is the second most important job there is, right after parenting.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    45. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just tell her you'll buy into their stupid frequent buyer program; I hear she gives blowjobs to all new subscribers.

    46. Re:Cool! by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      Side comment: Back in the old days there was a saying:

      "He's such a good salesman, he could sell ice to the Eskimos!"

      and along that line:

      "He's such a good salesman, he could bottle water and sell it!"

      Prophetic. Hopefully the first one will not become true also (and neither the one about bottled air...)

      (and yes, I can understand the reasons for buying bottled water, but compare the cost of it at $1 a bottle and the price of gasoline...)

    47. Re:Cool! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Can I have her number?

      42. Ask any parent, their kid's number is 42. Life, the universe, and everything.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    48. Re:Cool! by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      YES. I never stop feeling proud of the fact that I can point to him, and say "That man is my senator". If only we had more Congressmen like him, we might not be giving up civil liberties hand over fist.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    49. Re:Cool! by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      Sounds like you're a good caring dad; hang in there - and it sound like things are going good for your younger kid.

      In fact, a bit of work experience before college can be a really good thing.

    50. Re:Cool! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      As your obviously jealous comment comes from an anonymous coward, I take your flamebait as a compliment.

      You're welcome. Now shoo.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    51. Re:Cool! by Grant_Watson · · Score: 1

      If something is legal, then (by definition) it is not criminal.

      Is Slashdot the right place to bring up natural vs. positive law? Some things are forbidden even if not specifically banned. IIRC, this was much of the basis of common law, no?

      Whether lobbying is forbidden by natural law I don't know, but there it is.

    52. Re:Cool! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I have known many people who dropped out of high school, and intelligence seemed to have nothing to do with whether a person drops out or not, as the intelligence levels of the people I knew seemed to be across the board.

      Also, the only benefit that a GED has over a diploma is if you are trying to go to a college directly out of high school. Seriously, if you think a job cares, just lie. No one goes to check your HS diploma unless they are going to fire you anyway, and are desperately looking for a reason not to pay unemployment benefits. Even then, they are unlikely to look for a faked HS diploma, as even people with IQs of 65 can get one. The odds of them finding that as an excuse to fire you with cause is too small for them to consider.

    53. Re:Cool! by WDot · · Score: 1

      1. The North American school systems are garbage, they even fail at instilling basic discipline and respect.

      I think the problem with many of my teachers was they thought respect was assumed because they were in a position of power. Respect is EARNED. If I think you're a jerk, no amount of saying "I'm the teacher and I'm in charge" is going to make a difference. The teachers I respected most were passionate about their subject and were able to instill their passion in me. They were the ones who taught how THEY wanted, not how the state told them to. They rarely had to discipline their classes because the students respected them.

    54. Re:Cool! by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Certain types of college education make certain careers easier. That doesn't mean a formal education is necessary for great success. Consider Rush Limbaugh, many athletes, and most of the people featured on Investors Business Daily "Leaders and Success" page.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    55. Re:Cool! by John+Courtland · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah dude, you were trolling, whether you admit to it or not. Not only that but you're incorrect, you definitely don't need a degree to have opportunities, you just have to sweet talk a lot better than the guy with the sheep skin.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    56. Re:Cool! by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1
      Just because the chemical mentioned restored intelligence in mice whose brains had been damaged in one particular manner does not mean that it wouldn't help repair damage from other sources. In fact, the article even mentions other possibilities.

      Given that the side effects of the chemical can be pretty nasty, I wouldn't try it.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    57. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most important job is abortion doctor.

      One of those gets rids of the need for 3 social workers and 9 cops over a lifetime and the lifetime of the unsuccessful kids prevented.

    58. Re:Cool! by rcamans · · Score: 1

      Can we get this out to 100% of Slashdotters ASAP?

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    59. Re:Cool! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      The point being made is most bottled water is "purified drinking water" - which means it is usually just reverse-osmosis purified municipal water, taken from the same source that comes out of your tap. Only buy natural spring water if you buy bottled water. Aquafina and Dassani are the same exact water that comes from your tap as they are all bottled locally, and do not use a "central" water source. If you really don't like the taste of your tap water i would suggest either getting a water filter installed, or changing out your pipes if they are old.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    60. Re:Cool! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I don't know my IQ. And I probaby don't want to know. Knowing your IQ is often more hazardious then it is worth. I have seen a lot of people who say their IQ is in the 130 range fail (not just quit, but fail from bad grades on tests and such) out of school. Because they assume that they are smart so they don't need to work for knowledge. School is not about smarts is is about will power to work for your grade. Having a high IQ will not help you in life unless you are willing to work for it. Being able to retain information and make connections quickly is helpful however if you are not willing to work hard for it it will not bare any fruit.

      Having a High IQ as yours with proper formalization of education you could be a Professor or a Software Archectect/R&D and make an excelent salary.

      You post reminds me of what one of my more sarcastic teachers have said.

      "Strive for metocracy! Reach for the bare minimum! Have your goal in life is to just get by!"

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    61. Re:Cool! by nbritton · · Score: 1

      "She's planning on college with a major in music."

      Way to go on setting the expectations bar so low. From what I've read her only problem is you not pushing her to be the best she can be.

      Make her enroll in community college right now! Tell her that she can major in anything she wants, but if she doesn't get at least a bachelor's degree you'll be very disappointed.

      If you don't push her, she'll probably end up hating you because you limited her life options to being a stay-at-home mom with a bad husband.

    62. Re:Cool! by anti-human+1 · · Score: 1

      a flat (24 count case) of .5 liter bottles is $5. I currently live in an area with fluoridated tap water, and there's no way I'll drink that when $0.20 gets me at least reverse osmosis filtration.

    63. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you definitely don't need a degree to have opportunities,"

      Ah, a strawman argument - you and the imbecile I was replying to should team up for a series of audiobooks to show how to debate like a complete fucking moron.

      Okay chuckles - easy fucking question - if you have an advanced degree in a field of study, do you have more opportunities than someone with just a GED? The answer is yes. You have all the fucking opportunities that a GED affords (i.e. Gamestop manager, janitor, John Courtland) AND you've got all the additional opportunities that the advanced degree brings with it.

      RE-READ THE FUCKING POST I MADE YOU FUCKING MORON!!! I NEVER SAID YOU DIDN'T HAVE ANY FUCKING OPPORTUNITIES WITH A GED, THE FUCKING POINT WAS THAT THIS STUPID LITTLE CUNT HAS FEWER OPPORTUNITIES BECAUSE HER FUCKING FATHER WAS A SHITTY ASSHOLE AND ALLOWED HER TO SHUT THE DOORS ON THOSE FUCKING OPPORTUNITIES BY ALLOWING HER TO BE A FUCKING HIGH SCHOOL DROP-OUT!!!

      Now, I think you should seriously reconsider ever posting on Slashdot ever again. The whole "reading the posts for understanding" really seems to be a bit too much for you. Maybe just be a silent observer from now on, okay? Great! Have a nice day.

    64. Re:Cool! by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      Ha.

      Go to Central Park in NYC and pay $1.00 to $2.50 / liter water.

      Of course you could go to a public water fountain and pay $0...[and get water just as good or better]

    65. Re:Cool! by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      So I suppose have a high IQ could be considered a handicap...

      (and perhaps could be considered for government entitlements?)

      "Help! My IQ has gone through the roof and I can't get up!"

      Oh yeah your post is very true - I know many people whose IQ (at least as I perceive them) is fairly high but they are "failures" at life. Just too lazy and bored. Quite sad actually.

    66. Re:Cool! by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

      So that's where all the [philosophy|mathematics|English Literature|Journalism|Liberal Arts|Insert-your-favorite-supposedly-useless-degree-here] majors go for entertainment...

    67. Re:Cool! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The problem it is not a handycap. The problem when they know they are smart and have a high IQ they use it as a crutch to stop doing work, thinking they are so smart they don't need to do it. And creating bad habits and looking down on to others. Growing up with Dyslexia (a condition not coralated with IQ, as Albert Eistine had it too) myself I was treated as stupid thus forced me to work harder in life. Once I realized that I had Dyslexia and I wasn't that dumb (And showed high levels of Abstract Reasoning) in my early teens, I already had the work ethic down and focused using what I know and what I am good at to expand myself knowing what it feels like to be considered dumb, so I use the brain power to acheave more out of life then if I just though I was smart all allong.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    68. Re:Cool! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you.

      It doesn't help that they keep being told that they literally have "the most important job in world". Personally, I'll take garbage collectors, truck drivers for food and other supplies, farmers, and a whole slew of other jobs for my "most important" slot. If I had to make a list of professions that I had to protect, because one was going to magically disappear overnight, I doubt that "professional teacher" would even make the top 20. I doubt that "professional PUBLIC SCHOOL teacher" would make the top 40. No doubt it is great to live in a time and place that can afford to offer public education, but it certainly isn't as important as it is made out to be. This becomes even more the case when you get past grade school, since most adults don't retain any of their education beyond that anyway, yet function just fine in society.

    69. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a proud tap water drinker I'd agree with you...if I'd never tasted the foul, foul water in College Station, Texas. It's not the pipes (unless it's the pipes sucking it out of the ground) and filtration is about like swirling some chocolate syrup on a pair of sweaty gym socks. Granted, the sensible residents buy their water in jugs, not bottles, so perhaps your point stands.

    70. Re:Cool! by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      Where do you live that only 50.7% of the population is not mentally handicap?

      Now, this was definitely an underrated post. Not because of the concept, but due to your choice of words. LOL.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    71. Re:Cool! by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      You're right. I am cute.

      Perceptive.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    72. Re:Cool! by AmaranthineNight · · Score: 1

      A GED is exactly the same as a high school diploma, she just got it faster and moved on with life. She can still go to college if she wants to, she's only 21, and if she's that bright, she'll make short work of the place and have job experience to boot. Dropping out of high school is the best decision some people have ever made.

      Oh, and you were bitching about personal attacks, what do you call the entire fucking diatribe in caps lock you've got there?

    73. Re:Cool! by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Your phrasing in your original, angst-fueled post asserted that she had no opportunities, asshole. I quote, "otherwise she would have realized that you need certain credentials to get anywhere in life". Yes, you wrote that.

      Plenty of people make it "anywhere in life" sans "certain credentials". They just had to work a lot harder or be in the right place at the right time or whatever you want to call it.

      On a personal note, you gotta chill out. You're getting pissed at an internet message board and lashing out like a hurt child. If you act like this in real life you really need to reexamine your lifestyle and probably should seek therapy.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    74. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That doesn't mean a formal education is necessary for great success."

      Never said it was, fuckwit. Re-read the fucking post you moron. I was stating that when at a young age, a college degree opens up more opportunities for a person that may not have the slightest clue about what they want out of life. Your reading comprehension skills are shitty and I hope you get diarrhea tonight.

    75. Re:Cool! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Just because the chemical mentioned restored intelligence in mice whose brains had been damaged in one particular manner does not mean that it wouldn't help repair damage from other sources

      It specifically stated that it was only good for this one rare genetic disease.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    76. Re:Cool! by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      You make some valid points, in terms of bad habits and whatnot. When most everything comes easy, hard things seem -really- hard.

      However, high intelligence, if not a handicap in and of itself, can lead to significant social disorders.

      This shouldn't be surprising. Anything on the extreme ends of the intelligence bell curve is going to have problems meshing socially with the middle. The only thing that separates a gifted child from a retarded child in this aspect is that the gifted child has a higher chance of being able to fake normality.

      In terms of development, the root of the problem is that when everyone else is a young child, the highly gifted kid is many years ahead of them intellectually. Often they're not interested in the same activities, and discourse can be limited. So, no social meshing means not learning social basics. This has lots of ramifications throughout life, as the opportunities to learn them later are decreased by the social stigma of being behind in the first place.

      There are other frustrations for a highly intelligent person trying to communicate with the rest of the world. Some of it comes down to being several steps ahead in the thought process, and constantly having to bring others up to speed. You have no idea how frustrating that can be to do day in and day out.

      A secondary problem is that highly intelligent thought processes often include a lot of intuition. Your mind sort of works in the background and suggests the solution, Then you figure out how to explain why the solution works...in that order. It makes it a little difficult to explain conclusions in real-time.

      In the end, it's hard to complain. There are lots of opportunities that are only available or at least more easily available to the highly intelligent. However, emotionally speaking, it definitely has its pitfalls. Go to any Mensa gathering for plenty of real-world examples.

    77. Re:Cool! by guruevi · · Score: 1

      I am earning very well (at least for the area I live in, I could make more in places like SF but don't want to live there) and I am a Systems Analyst/Programmer at a University. I did fail at some things in school just because I was bored and thus didn't study, I understand the value of knowledge and I have been able to catch up on some things while other things I like to find out for myself.

      I believe that knowing how to apply all that knowledge and how to think is more valuable than book smarts. I have had my own company for a while, I was making over 80k in an area in Pennsylvania where the average income is 35k. I have missed some opportunities because I didn't have the right 'paperwork' for that career in that type of organization but on the other side, it thought me a lot more working for smaller companies and differentiating.

      I am also an immigrant into the US as of 3 years now and haven't had 2 consecutive months of unemployment (the fact that I can't benefit from unemployment and social security might have helped that part). Yes, I can't become something I don't want to be in the first place (having a job based on your papers that is) but on the other hand, I get enjoyment out of my work and any company willing to look into the value of my work history instead of the smaller 'educational' section of my resume has been better off. Working in those environments, especially PA and upstate NY 'small family businesses' showed me where I have to have my priorities in life. Yes I can make the big bucks as I did in my home country (where my income was equivalent to that of many a civil engineer), but at the expense of family and friends but I rather have a loving wife and maybe later some mini-me's running around whilst not be able to afford the latest Lexus (although I'm coming pretty close at being able to afford a used Lexus).

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    78. Re:Cool! by anti-human+1 · · Score: 1

      Well sure, if you buy it in a corner shop. Its no wonder there's an abundance of mini-marts and such in metropolitan areas. The prices are ridiculous, and people will pay it. Its just like at an amusement park or stadium; $7 beers, $4 soda, $3 water. That's supply and demand for ya.

      I've overpaid for water a few times, but my lifetime average price for water is no more than $0.60/Liter. Also, my experience with residential tap water is limited. Seattle/Tacoma - Pretty good. Tampa/St. Pete - pretty much terrible. I currently live north of Knoxville, and have stayed away from the tap.

  3. Every Rose Has Its Thorn by MaliciousSmurf · · Score: 4, Informative

    "There are, however, the expected side effects from a drug that suppresses the immune system: impaired wound healing, infections, mouth sores and, in rare instances, skin cancer." (and every cowboy sings a sad sad song.)

    1. Re:Every Rose Has Its Thorn by sheepweevil · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a way, using current technology, to cure Type 1 Diabetes: an islet cell transplant. The reason every Diabetic in the world isn't getting it, though, is that having to take antirejection drugs is worse than simply using insulin therapy for most people. I am curious to know how the benefits outweigh the risks in this case.

  4. Obligatory by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

    that that is is that that is not is not is that it it is

    That that is, is. That that is not, is not. is that it? It is.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  5. Finally a cure by gijoel · · Score: 5, Funny

    NARF!!!!!

    1. Re:Finally a cure by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      So Pinky and The Brain are the same mouse, huh? Rapamycin-induced MPD could explain it. Takes the drug: "Try to take over the world!" Drug wears off: "NARF!!!"

    2. Re:Finally a cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FRAN1111? naem tahw, seod taht?

      -atoy

  6. w00h00! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is hope for Pinky now!

    -db

  7. good news for cowboyneal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good news cowboy neal! Unfortunately, you're still fat.

  8. Jack Thompson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Jack needs to be volunteered to be the first human test subject. If it can cure him, it'll cure anyone.

    1. Re:Jack Thompson by curmudgeous · · Score: 1

      I'd also like to nominate FOX news anchors for test subjects. It sure can't make them any worse.

    2. Re:Jack Thompson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, are you saying there are news anchors somewhere who aren't complete buffoons? I don't see the need to single out anchors on Fox News -- give it to the whole lot of 'em. Maybe some day we'll see a news story about technology that isn't wildly inaccurate.

    3. Re:Jack Thompson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Fox news anchors aren't as bad as NBC's and CNN's. Fox news just pushed one side of a story, the others actually make up stories then push one side of it. Dan Rather had to be retarded to make up a fake story and think he wouldn't get caught in our highly connected society.

  9. $1k per month by Dougmeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Rapamycin costs about $1,000 per month" For the rest of your life. Wow. I guess that's still a price that someone would be willing to pay if it would benefit them.

    1. Re:$1k per month by east+coast · · Score: 5, Insightful

      1K to turn someone into a productive member of society and lead a meaningful life? It's a bargain. We're paying more than that to keep rapists alive in jails. Not to mention that as technology moves on it will either cost less or new drug will take it's place being either more effective or less expensive.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:$1k per month by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The cost for custodial care of a moderately to severely impaired autistic adult is an order of magnitude higher. Not to mention the very guilty feeling one endures for choosing to put someone into custodial care.

      --
      Invenio via vel creo
    3. Re:$1k per month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that volume production will reduce pricing.

    4. Re:$1k per month by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0, Troll

      > 1K to turn someone into a productive slave of the pharma industry and lead a meaningless life?

      Here, fixed that for you.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    5. Re:$1k per month by KaizerttheBjorn · · Score: 1
      Hah! We already are slaves of the pharma industry. My doctor tells me I have severe restless leg syndrome, and he recommends Mirapex®.


      If you think you have Restless Leg Syndrome, ask your doctor about Mirapex®.

      Mirapex®, for effective long term relief of moderate to severe primary restless leg syndrome.

      --
      Boycott shampoo! Demand the REAL poo!
    6. Re:$1k per month by east+coast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, so you're born with a condition outside of your control and someone comes up with a cure or at least an alleviation of the condition and you see yourself as a slave? Oh, sorry, the fact that you have the ability to simply comprehend the situation and respond to it (as misguided as your response may be) shows that you're not suffering like these people are.

      Being a member of a family with a severely autistic child (my nephew), I can tell you that giving up a bit of cash to the pharmaceutical industry (that paid for the R&D for the potential cure with no guarantee of success or redemption of that funding) is a small price to pay. It's strikes me not only as odd but also as how downright lunkheaded some members of society are about this. Without profit involved the pharmaceutical industry would dry up fast than a puddle in the desert. If that's what you want why not simply boycott the industry. After all, you've already taken the aloof position of not needing their cures anyway.

      I suppose you think it's better to languish in pain and suffering instead of paying your fair dues to an entity that gambled to create a remedy in the first place.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    7. Re:$1k per month by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      For someone making the Federal minimum wage in the US, his earnings would almost pay for this drug.

      You're not going to get a middle class job with the rare genetic disorder this drug treats.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    8. Re:$1k per month by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Not initially, no. These people are going to have to depend on the good will of others or maybe help from their insurance or Medicare. But as time goes by the cure will likely cost less and become more effective. This is the trend for nearly all medications. So the early adopter expense will be high, there will hopefully be continued R&D and maybe in a few decades the cure for this will be as common and at the same price of some fairly normal vaccinations.

      It's not a perfect solution. No solution is and it's only painfully true when the first couple of version of a solution come in to being.

      But it's progress and progress is good enough for me.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    9. Re:$1k per month by karnal · · Score: 1

      Some side effects include nausea, vomiting, projectile colon blowing, gangrene of the legs or in some cases death. BUYBUYBUYBUY!

      --
      Karnal
    10. Re:$1k per month by cparker15 · · Score: 1

      Is that before or after health insurance? Because that's about what I pay for health insurance per month, and the cost is going up soon.

      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

    11. Re:$1k per month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a small price... if we had this 8 years ago, think of the billions we would have saved.

    12. Re:$1k per month by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Or you can simply refuse treatment. Let's face facts here people, no one forces you to use medication. You can refuse it if you want to and take your chances. That's all up to you.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    13. Re:$1k per month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna wait a short while for the generic form "hiphopamycin" to hit the market

    14. Re:$1k per month by sorak · · Score: 1

      I spent several years working with people with Mental Retardation. Granted, these were not considered "mild cases", and as such, may be beyond the help of this drug, but I have to tell you, if I had a choice between their life, or having to spend half my income on drugs, even with the possibility of long-term liver damage, I would still take the drugs.

    15. Re:$1k per month by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Don't get so goddamned defensive. No one is downplaying the suffering that people with mental disabilities face (or those who care for them), what's being said is that it's not fair for them to have to pay a metric shit-ton of money to find relief. In other words, WE'RE ON YOUR SIDE AND WANT THINGS TO BE BETTER FOR YOU.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    16. Re:$1k per month by CeruleanDragon · · Score: 1

      1K to turn someone into a productive member of society and lead a meaningful life? It's a bargain. We're paying more than that to keep rapists alive in jails. Not to mention that as technology moves on it will either cost less or new drug will take it's place being either more effective or less expensive.

      More effective or less expensive? Where are you from? Someplace without capitalism? Lemme know, I want to move there! heh Unfortunately there's less profit in more effective/less expensive drugs. Less effective *and* more expensive, now that's where the money is! Why make $1000 profit to cure someone in 3 days when you can make $100 per day to keep someone "marginably better" for years, eh?

      And to think, I didn't even have to spend 4 years in business school to figure that out! (yes, I'm being darkly sarcastic, but I worked for a pharmaceuticals company, I've met the brains that tick like that, they scare and anger me.)

      --
      ad astra per alia porci
    17. Re:$1k per month by tepples · · Score: 1

      I suppose you think it's better to languish in pain and suffering instead of paying your fair dues to an entity that gambled to create a remedy in the first place.

      If you buy the drug, you can't afford rent and food. If you buy rent and food, you can't afford the drug. Which would you choose?

    18. Re:$1k per month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buying the drug and getting food stamps and Section 8!

    19. Re:$1k per month by east+coast · · Score: 1

      So it's fair for a pharmaceutical company to have to eat R&D costs because? Please explain this to me and explain how you think future R&D should be handled if they don't have the opportunity to make money from their last venture. As much as you may be on "my side" you're not looking at the reality of the current model nor are you proposing a model that works in another fashion that doesn't require that someone else "just" does this or "just" does that.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    20. Re:$1k per month by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      According to TFA the drug isn't all that new.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    21. Re:$1k per month by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      I understand that. I'm saying you're wrong in jumping down the throat of someone who wants treatment for disabled people to be affordable, claiming that he doesn't care about their plight. I never intended to propose a new model, although I would sure love to hear one.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    22. Re:$1k per month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, folks, there are plenty of medications that cost > $1K per month.

      All those TV commercials you see with smiling older ladies hawking Humira, Enbrel or Remicade for rheumatoid arthritis? Those drugs fall into that category.

      My wife (I know, now you all think I'm making this up) is on Humira, and our 25% co-pay for that stuff is over $300. You do the math. But it has literally changed her life, and if we didn't have insurance, I would gladly work a second job if necessary to get it for her at full retail price.

      Slightly more on-topic, if there were a drug that would bring my sister-in-law up out of severe autism to a normal functional level for a mere $12,000 a year, that would be a bargain for the state compared to what they no doubt spend to care for her as a ward of the state.

    23. Re:$1k per month by Bananas · · Score: 1

      1K to turn someone into a productive member of society and lead a meaningful life? It's a bargain. We're paying more than that to keep rapists alive in jails. Not to mention that as technology moves on it will either cost less or new drug will take it's place being either more effective or less expensive.

      So...let me get this straight, 30%-50% of my child's future income will go into this treatment so they can do nothing but work, because there's no money left over to live life? Do you honestly think that people live to work, instead of work to live?

    24. Re:$1k per month by Bananas · · Score: 1

      I suppose you think it's better to languish in pain and suffering instead of paying your fair dues to an entity that gambled to create a remedy in the first place.

      WTF?

      This isn't church.

    25. Re:$1k per month by Bananas · · Score: 1

      ...explain how you think future R&D should be handled if they don't have the opportunity to make money from their last venture.

      I'll do that as soon as you explain to me why it's far more important to develop not one but TWO(!) drugs to get me up and hard for the wife, yet there are horrible, terrible, but completely treatable conditions world-wide that we completely ignore because "there's no profit to be had".

      Profits or people. And in this case, it's not a "many-shades-of-grey" or "I-can-weasel-out-because-of-circumstances" choice. So...Choose.

    26. Re:$1k per month by east+coast · · Score: 1

      I'll do that as soon as you explain to me why it's far more important to develop not one but TWO(!) drugs to get me up and hard for the wife

      Why don't you learn the history of these meds first? Viagra was NOT developed to cause erections, it's original development was around hypertension and angina. So they found another use for the compound. Should they have thrown the baby out with the bath water to satisfy you? Also, your rant is along the line of the people who would scream "Why do we have TV entertainment when the airtime could be used for educational purposes? Why do we have malls when we could have wheat fields? Why do we have iPods when we could be using these electronics for building a better world?" Do you care to answer those questions? How dare you use a great invention like the internet to sit on slashdot and comment? How dare Slashdot think that they're important enough to take up server space or bandwidth?

      yet there are horrible, terrible, but completely treatable conditions world-wide that we completely ignore because "there's no profit to be had".

      If there is a treatment for it what more do you want the pharmaceutical companies to do? It seems that they did their part, they developed a cure. What else would you have them do?

      My guess is that if you cared to name a few of these diseases you'd quickly find that people are dying not because of the pharmaceutical companies but because of local customs (call it religion if you like), political situations, miseducation, blackmarket substandard meds, etc etc etc.

      Profits or people. And in this case, it's not a "many-shades-of-grey" or "I-can-weasel-out-because-of-circumstances" choice. So...Choose.

      It's not shades of grey for you because you see the world in black and white. I have no problem with pharmaceutical companies using their money to try to make more money. That's the nature of capitalism. I choose to let companies do what they can to survive. As much as you bitch and wail about "drugs to get me up and hard" you've completely neglected the tons of drugs that are saving lives and helping people remain functional members of society. Stop putting bullshit spin and outright ignorance into the debate and maybe you'll see that it's not what you make it out to be.

      And like I've already told another poster, if you don't like the way pharmaceutical companies conduct their business than start your own. You and millions of people on the street scream there is a better way, prove it!

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    27. Re:$1k per month by Bananas · · Score: 1
      If there is a treatment for it what more do you want the pharmaceutical companies to do? It seems that they did their part, they developed a cure. What else would you have them do? What cure? The point of that was that cures can be found in a cost-effective fashion that allows people *around the world* to have access to them. But because there is *no profit to be had* in that situation, they will never be developed.

      My guess is that if you cared to name a few of these diseases you'd quickly find that people are dying not because of the pharmaceutical companies but because of local customs (call it religion if you like), political situations, miseducation, blackmarket substandard meds, etc etc etc.

      Let's try that again:

      My guess is that if you cared to name a few of these issues surrounding starvation you'd quickly find that people are dying not because of the lack of food but because of local customs (call it religion if you like), political situations, miseducation, blackmarket substandard food, etc etc etc.

      Hmm, sounds wrong.

      ...your rant is along the line of the people who would scream "Why do we have TV entertainment when the airtime could be used for educational purposes? Why, yes, after watching the crap that parades for entertainment, that question DOES resonate with me.

      Why do we have malls when we could have wheat fields? Given that half the shopping malls within a 25 mile radius are unlit or partly rented, in an area of a measily 1.5 million people, and in a state where hunger is an issue, that is a good question.

      Why do we have iPods when we could be using these electronics for building a better world? An excellent choice! By the way, I don't own one, nor will I ever.

      Do you care to answer those questions? Yes I do. What we are doing now - having discourse over these topics - is just that.

      How dare you use a great invention like the internet to sit on slashdot and comment? Because the commentary is geared towards improvements in society? Or because I'm fawning over the latest goddamn worthless gadget?

      How dare Slashdot think that they're important enough to take up server space or bandwidth? Ah...did slashdot charge me $4 through my $480/month insurance for that?

      I choose to let companies do what they can to survive. As much as you bitch and wail about "drugs to get me up and hard" you've completely neglected the tons of drugs that are saving lives and helping people remain functional members of society. Stop putting bullshit spin and outright ignorance into the debate and maybe you'll see that it's not what you make it out to be.

      I see.

      Survive. Right.

      Oh gawd, if I laughed any harder...

      Tons of drugs...you mean, like when they slightly changed Prozac and re-marketed it as a new drug? You do know why, right?

      Tell you what. Tell me how record profits make it difficult to "survive". Tell me how people using treatments for AIDS will "survive" compared to the companies selling them drugs.

      Hey, it's only a few hundred dollars a bottle to get AZT. I'm sure that's an affordable price in Africa.

      And like I've already told another poster, if you don't like the way pharmaceutical companies conduct their business than start your own. You and millions of people on the street scream there is a better way, prove it! With what? It's not a "prove it" issue, it's a "no-one can afford to prove it" issue.

      Here, let's make it simple.

      I'll start a pharma company. I need to make profits. I develop an amazing drug that I can sell for $10 wholesale that fights malaria. I also develop one for $100 wholesale that makes you orgasm twice.

      Which should I sell?

      If you answer the first one, you loose (your argument).

      If you answer the second one, you loose (your perspective).

      Do you understand now?

    28. Re:$1k per month by east+coast · · Score: 1

      What cure? The point of that was that cures can be found in a cost-effective fashion that allows people *around the world* to have access to them. But because there is *no profit to be had* in that situation, they will never be developed.

      You said for "treatable condition" that means there is a cure. That's what I'm talking about since you didn't mention specific conditions. Talk about double speak.

      My guess is that if you cared to name a few of these issues surrounding starvation you'd quickly find that people are dying not because of the lack of food but because of local customs (call it religion if you like), political situations, miseducation, blackmarket substandard food, etc etc etc.

      Hmm, sounds wrong.

      Actually, it sounds right, the way you twisted my ideas is what is wrong. What does food have to do with pharmaceuticals? We're talking about pharmaceuticals and the industry here. Stop trying to divert the topic to attempt to fool people into thinking you have a valid point. It ain't going to work on me.

      And don't forget that tragedies like Ethiopia happened because there was tons of food on Ethiopian docs but he military kept it from civilians. It's a perfect example!

      Why, yes, after watching the crap that parades for entertainment, that question DOES resonate with me.

      You don't use your valuable technology for entertainment that (gasp!) costs money? How dare you? That 10 or 15 dollars a month could be keeping poor Julio in Ecuador in shoes and rice! Hypocrite.

      Seems that you don't care if you're the one having the fun but God forbid others spend their spare cash to improve their lives.

      Tons of drugs...you mean, like when they slightly changed Prozac and re-marketed it as a new drug? You do know why, right?

      More effective dosage? Plenty of products outside of the industry do the same thing. Do you scream "scam" anytime you see synthetic oil ads? If you do you're a fool. And the bottomline is that the generic still existed and people could take it instead. Or are you going to blame the pharmaceutical industry for the tons of people who demand brandname when a generic is the same and scripted as such by the MD?

      Hey, it's only a few hundred dollars a bottle to get AZT. I'm sure that's an affordable price in Africa.

      AZT? LOL! It's called nevirapine. Granted, there is a threshold of resistance but normally these strains that are resistant to nevirapine are also resistant to AZT. Look into it.

      With what? It's not a "prove it" issue, it's a "no-one can afford to prove it" issue.

      Go out and pull some money and produce pharmaceuticals. Do the R&D to come up with the cures that you claim aren't made because there is no profit to be had in producing them and if you find one make it public domain so that there is no patent fights and produce it for cheap to give to everyone you claim is suffering. There is nothing preventing you from doing this and there are millions out there who say the same thing as you. Put your EVE Online cash into the venture and if you get get everyone else to pony up the same you could probably have enough money to research several meds a year. Granted, not all of them will pass FDA testing but you'll get one or two to slip through. That should thrill you if you're sincere about it. I'd even kick in a C-note or two a year if you can come up with one of the truly vital cures that you say companies don't produce because of profit.

      Do you understand now?

      I understand that you don't live by your own ideals and that you're just going to take the easy way out. In your theoretical pharmaceutical company you claim that profits are needed to produce further research. This is true. But you turn around and make a foolish argument that makes it seem like a company can only make one cure or another. It's nonsense. Do you know how hard it is to make

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    29. Re:$1k per month by Bananas · · Score: 1
      What cure? The point of that was that cures can be found in a cost-effective fashion that allows people *around the world* to have access to them. But because there is *no profit to be had* in that situation, they will never be developed.

      You said for "treatable condition" that means there is a cure. That's what I'm talking about since you didn't mention specific conditions. Talk about double speak.

      (sigh) fine, as I didn't make clear that the existing Pharma corps don't see a profit and therefore aren't motivated to pursue those, I'll conceed this to you.

      My guess is that if you cared to name a few of these issues surrounding starvation you'd quickly find that people are dying not because of the lack of food but because of local customs (call it religion if you like), political situations, miseducation, blackmarket substandard food, etc etc etc. Hmm, sounds wrong. What does food have to do with pharmaceuticals? We're talking about pharmaceuticals and the industry here. Stop trying to divert the topic to attempt to fool people into thinking you have a valid point.

      This was an examination of the process, not a diversion. I'm thinking out loud - as it's confusing to you, ignore it.

      And don't forget that tragedies like Ethiopia happened because there was tons of food on Ethiopian docs but he military kept it from civilians. It's a perfect example!

      I see tragedy here at home. Don't even need a plane/train/auto/ship ticket to get there. There's no military preventing people from getting to food here, is there? Political issues? Only if you think the govt. has some weird conspiratorial agenda. Insanity? Some of the folks I see are, but not all of them. So what does that leave? Why do people starve in a "land of plenty"? I've been trying to answer that one for over a decade. You have an answer for this situation - why people starve, even die, state-side?

      Why, yes, after watching the crap that parades for entertainment, that question DOES resonate with me. You don't use your valuable technology for entertainment that (gasp!) costs money? How dare you? That 10 or 15 dollars a month could be keeping poor Julio in Ecuador in shoes and rice! Hypocrite.

      How do you kow that I have not been sending that money for some time now? Do you know how many charities keep asking me for more money, yet I struggle to feed my own?

      By the way, the reference was to Television, not Internet Gaming. And yes, there's tons of crap in Internet Gaming too. Still, tit for tat - you say I'm confusing things, I think you're there with me.

      Seems that you don't care if you're the one having the fun but God forbid others spend their spare cash to improve their lives.

      Ya know what, I bet you think I have cable TV and Air Conditioning. You probably even think I drive a car to work; OK, a car is a bit much, let's go with a moped or motorcycle. Let's lay it out - you tell me the luxury that I have and I'll see if I even have it. Don't tell me running clean water or clean air or some other baloney. If the necessities of living is a luxury then that opens the door to all kinds of nasty things that we don't want to talk about.

      By the way, the internet hookup is a necessity - it's a job *requirement*, which in turn implies a job, which in turn implies that maybe I need to earn money and pay it for rent/food/water/not freezing to death. And that "idle" time of not using it is wasted. So I hardly see the argument that my postings on the Internet are a waste - it's a type of resource that's wasted if it's not utilized. Something about electrical power being consumed no matter if the routers are transmitting or not...

      No, I will not accept "get another job" as a realistic option. Let's just not go there - it'll lead to nasty things like neglect charges, starvation, and exposure to the elements.

      Tons o

  10. Autism Affects 1 in 160 Children in the US by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Having studied the autistic spectrum to some degree, this provides hope for only a few of the range of autistic symptoms. To learn more, check out Autism Speaks.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
    1. Re:Autism Affects 1 in 160 Children in the US by jeiler · · Score: 1

      Anybody have any figures on what percentage of autism patients have the TSC gene?

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    2. Re:Autism Affects 1 in 160 Children in the US by netsavior · · Score: 1

      Autism speaks is a hate group, hell bent on curing people of their personality, and scaring parents into giving them and doctors associated with them millions and millions of dollars.

      I am an Autistic Adult *gasp* with a $120,000/year salary (Senior Risk Analysis Software Development for major bank) and a wife and an autistic son, who also does not need curing.

      That hate group is all about fearmongering and "Early intervention or lifelong disability" bullshit that is just not true and not well researched, just well-funded.

      The truth is those of us with "big bad Autism" who have times where we are unable to speak, and times where we are less functional, usually hide it very well by the time we are adults. The "Autism Epidemic" is a result of "Autism Awareness" and does not really represent a specific unexpected change in personality types across the country. More a utilization of more information. Since GENETIC factors are proven to be significant in Autism, it shouldn't be suprised that we diagnose it more often now that children are seen in the context of a society, and not in the context of "what your mom taught you"... The strategy for raising children until VERY recently was grandmas teaching new mothers what to expect and how to deal with it. So differences in genetic-neurological profile would be seen in the context of 2 gene pools, rather than in the context of an entire society like today. I mean, I didn't speak till age 3, nor did my son, nor did my dad... In a "classical" society my family would just say "yeah, boys don't talk till age 3". In modern society, you have Autism speaks making unfounded claims that If your child doesn't speak by age 3, he is autistic and unless you start "early intervention" he will be in a group home at age 18. (of course this is an oversimplification, there are many other factors in diagnosing Autism)

      Additionally other profiteering hate groups such as DAN! (Destroy Autism now) like to sell expensive dangerous suppliments and Chelation therapy because a few people showing autistic traits happened to be poisoned with mercury... So now they make big money starving the mercury out of children's systems (read about chelation) even if there is no evidence of mercury exposure/poisoning...

      my big fear is that this immunosupression which is for treating a SPECIFIC condition (TSC) will be used by autism profiteers in a similar way, and they will sell $1000/month high risk poison as an "Autism Cure". After very carefully creating an atmosphere where Autism is feared, hated, and misunderstood.

      The depths they go to in order to create then exploit fear and hope in parents is criminal. It is so sad that legitimate scientific advance has to come under such assault.

    3. Re:Autism Affects 1 in 160 Children in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That site is for a group that wants to make us all neurotypical!

    4. Re:Autism Affects 1 in 160 Children in the US by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      So differences in genetic-neurological profile would be seen in the context of 2 gene pools, rather than in the context of an entire society like today. I mean, I didn't speak till age 3, nor did my son, nor did my dad... In a "classical" society my family would just say "yeah, boys don't talk till age 3". In modern society, you have Autism speaks making unfounded claims that If your child doesn't speak by age 3,

      I have to agree with you on the whole "grandmother" thing. My cousin has a child who is a little odd, and my grandmother is ripe with advice. It's kind of funny, she used to tell a story about how one of my father's cousins defecated in the middle of a room when she baby-sat him; and then she firmly claims that he's on my grandfather's side of the family.

      I'm glad the autism scare hasn't hit my family. My nephew was recently diagnosed with a speech impediment; yet he's very talented in math. When he was 2-3 years old, he'd flip light switches on and off for 30-40 minutes at a time. As a family, we just thought it was cute! Another time, I watched him open and close a closet door for 20 minutes straight. My nephew will be completely fine in life.

      I do know an autisic who really shouldn't be living independantly, although he's a bit of an extreme case. It's a shame the "cure autism" community can't tell the difference between people who are just a little different and other people who really can't take care of themselves. Of the 1 in 160 children who have autism, how many truly are incapable of caring for themselves?

  11. Correction: Autism Affects 1 in 150 Children by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

    Today's belated visit shows an increase over their previously published statistic.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
    1. Re:Correction: Autism Affects 1 in 150 Children by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Wow those numbers are high. 1 in 150 is a very large percentage of the population. Is it being over diagnosed? Or are there a lot of cases in which the child is only mildly affected. there is quite a range of how it can affect the child. Also, do those numbers only include autism, or anything "on the spectrum" such as aspergers. Wikipedia states that the numbers for autism are around 1-2 per 1000, and about 6 per 1000 for ASD (on the spectrum).

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Correction: Autism Affects 1 in 150 Children by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

      I would assume their statistic includes the entire spectrum of autistic disorder classifications. To oversimplify, from lesser to greater impact on individual functioning, the most common diagnoses on the spectrum are Pervasive Developmental Disorder-Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS), Asperger's Syndrome and Autism.

      --
      Invenio via vel creo
  12. How do you tell a mouse is mentally Impaired? by Technopaladin · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well besides the obvious...votes Republican and makes less the 150k a year, Laughs at Carlos Mencia jokes, and lawyers beat it through the maze?

    Guessing a drug that cures those symptoms would truly be a blessing

    1. Re:How do you tell a mouse is mentally Impaired? by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

      Easy, listen for "Narf!"

      --
      Invenio via vel creo
    2. Re:How do you tell a mouse is mentally Impaired? by otacon · · Score: 1

      It's not like mice are that smart to begin with. Then again the same can be said about the general population.

      --
      In a world of acronyms, the words are the real victims.
    3. Re:How do you tell a mouse is mentally Impaired? by Technopaladin · · Score: 0, Troll

      I gotta ask. Whoever marked me down troll...which of the 3 were you?

  13. Eight years too late. by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or two legislatures, as you prefer.

  14. Retarded mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do they know which mice are retarded or not? Give them the cheese test?

    1. Re:Retarded mice by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Funny

      How do they know which mice are retarded or not? Give them the cheese test?

      They see if the mice RTFA and actually understand it.

      My daughter's cat is pretty damned dumb, it moves its lips when it reads.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:Retarded mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whichever one causes the world not to be taken over is the retarded one. The scientists check every night. It's the same thing they do every night.

    3. Re:Retarded mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do they know which mice are retarded or not? Give them the cheese test?

      They see if the mice RTFA and actually understand it.

      If that were the true test of intelligence, most /.ers would fail miserably. ;-)

  15. crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    lots and lots of anti-republican comments and most of them are going to get modded way the hell up, but I bet if someone said "give this to democrats LOL" they'd get modded into oblivion

    hahhhahaha captcha is "erector"

    1. Re:crazy by Teckla · · Score: 1

      lots and lots of anti-republican comments and most of them are going to get modded way the hell up, but I bet if someone said "give this to democrats LOL" they'd get modded into oblivion

      Oh, quit whining. People always poke a lot more fun at the party of the administration currently in power.

    2. Re:crazy by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

      Oh, quit whining. People always poke a lot more fun at the party of the administration currently in power.

      Apparently you weren't here in the days of the previous Democratic administration. It was all "Stupid republicans! Leave Bill alone!".

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    3. Re:crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lots and lots of anti-republican comments and most of them are going to get modded way the hell up, but I bet if someone said "give this to democrats LOL" they'd get modded into oblivion

      But they literally are retarded. I take it you've never been to a red state.

      It's funny because it's true.

  16. Science has to be stopped. by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


    If they cure autism, what am I supposed to do to find postal codes if Billy the office cleanup boy is cured? Look them up online?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Science has to be stopped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they cure autism, what am I supposed to do to find postal codes if Billy the office cleanup boy is cured? Look them up online?

      You're an arsehole. Autism is not ANYTHING to be laughed at. I'll guarantee that my son who has ASD is way smarter than you, you pinhead. You disguise ignorance and bigotry under the banner of humour.
      You cannot CURE an Autistic person - you would in fact DESTROY that personality and create someone else. This is an ethical and moral issue. How would you like it if I rewired your brain just to see if it would make you more "normal". This is paramount to a desire to "wipe out" people that some members of society see as "defective". Hitler tried that.

  17. Cod Liver Oil by lobiusmoop · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Make sure you get plenty of Omega-3 and Omega-6 fatty acids while you're growing up (good source = cod liver oil), and you can avoid many mental problems in the first place

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    1. Re:Cod Liver Oil by btellier · · Score: 1

      Easy there.. from this:
      Some medical research suggests that excessive levels of n6 fatty acids, relative to n3 fatty acids, may increase the probability of a number of diseases and depression.

      Modern Western diets typically have ratios of n6 to n3 in excess of 10 to 1, some as high as 30 to 1. The optimal ratio is thought to be 4 to 1 or lower.

      ...

      Chronic excessive production of n6 eicosanoids is associated with heart attacks, thrombotic stroke, arrhythmia, arthritis, osteoporosis, inflammation, mood disorders and cancer.

  18. As a parent of an Autistic... by BobMcD · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...let me say that any hope is a good hope. This condition is a far, far greater burden than you probably realize, and to date most of medical science is still groping in the dark.

    My son's neurologist actually prescribed an anti-psychotic to a three-year-old boy. One that, by the way, had NEVER been tested on children and was not FDA approved for that purpose.

    There are some voodoo-science options as well. Some work all the time for certain cases, while others do not work at all. Gluten-free/Casen-free diet, Omega3's, Anti-Fungals etc, etc, etc. If you take information like this to a practicing MD they are quite likely to either roll their eyes our laugh outright. Still, there are those that swear by them.

    This is where we presently sit.

    Imagine having a young man, totally dependent on you, who is struggling not only to fit in, but to avoid punishment for perfectly natural behaviors. Now imagine the feeling when the realization sets in that you simply will not ever be able to 'fix' him, no matter how much parenting you may apply. In fact, try though you do, at the end of the day it feels like no one has helped him at all.

    Any hope is a good hope.

    1. Re:As a parent of an Autistic... by aproposofwhat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Any hope is a good hope.

      Amen to that - I'm looking forward to taking my severely autistic stepson out to the Brooklands Double Twelve this Sunday, and will be taking the utmost pleasure from seeing him enjoy himself among all the old racing cars.

      The behavioural problems we can cope with, but he's physically handicapped as well, so in residential care.

      But every Sunday, come rain or shine, it's Josh's day.

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    2. Re:As a parent of an Autistic... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I hear that. My mother in law has a foster child who is autistic. It's extremely difficult. I wouldn't discount any "voodoo" treatments if I were you though. Although completely unrelated to autism, I've known many people who have cured migraines, just by cutting out certain things from their diet. People who used to be debilitated by migraines for a day or two a week, now cease to have any at all, simply because of a change in diet. Also, concerning diet and autism, some autistic refuse to eat many foods, and apparently it's quite common for them to have an attachment to a particular colour of food. So getting them to eat better can be helped along by offering them foods of their preferred colour.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:As a parent of an Autistic... by TornCityVenz · · Score: 1

      My youngest child acually has TSC (tuberous sclerosis complex). Perhaps the worst part is watching her struggle to fit in while completly aware that she does'nt. She is normal enough that anyperson seeing her on the street on in a restruant etc might think without carefull observation that she is at worst a young girl who has not gotten enough sleep, or is "haveing a bad day" behaviorly, however everyday is like this. We struggle daily with her attitude and behavior however. This was hard enough when she was younger, but as she gets older more and more I find myself wondering what will become of her.There is no 'fix' for her. Any hope is good hope. -Amen

      --
      I Need someone to rebuild a Digitech Digital Delay pedal for me....for me...for me...for me.
    4. Re:As a parent of an Autistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some thirty odd years ago and desperate to pay the rent, I took a job playing Santa Claus for a clothing store. One day while sitting my chair an old white haired woman walked in with a rather hefty man beside her, he looked to be in his mid to late fifties and seemed a bit unusual in his gait and in general mannerisms. Upon spotting me he shouted "Santa" and hurried over. He politely asked if he could sit on my lap and give me his Christmas wish list, assuring me he had been a good boy all year. Upon receiving my permission, he quickly and carefully sat himself upon my knee and told me all the things he wanted for Christmas with his mother listening and watching carefully. After a bit of banter with Santa his mother told him it was time to go and he got up and walked with her from the store. Her face gleamed with the smile of a proud mother of a well behaved child and her own accomplicement of making her child happy.

      Don't believe that man could be described as autistic but definitely mentally handicaped. For all the parents of those who are children forever, for what it is worth, you have my respect.

    5. Re:As a parent of an Autistic... by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Any hope is a good hope."
      Not really. False hope is terrible. My nephew is Autistic and the amount of total junk being tried just makes me nuts.
      In this case I am just praying that this is real hope.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:As a parent of an Autistic... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      My son has high functioning autism and the doctor wanted to put him on 5 psychoactive drugs.
      She had the little advertising doo-dads from the drug companies all over her office.

      That was the last visit with her and our son is doing fine drug-free.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    7. Re:As a parent of an Autistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with the "any hope is a good hope" thinking is that it gets people killed. Every single year a kid dies from cancer because the parents think some bogus "alternative" cure caused remission, and then stick with the pseudoscience when the cancer comes back.

       

    8. Re:As a parent of an Autistic... by coopex · · Score: 1

      You are my hero, far too many people will want to "help" your son "fit in", especially if he's smarter than average and confident about it.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
  19. Re:Can this be used in politics? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    If so, when is someone gonna slip this to our witless president?

    Now if it can cure him then it really will cure anyone.

    I thought the NeoCons were evil geniuses who had tricked the US into attacking Iraq to steal the oil and set up a police state back home.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  20. Watch out for the autism lobby on this one! by Grendel_Prime · · Score: 1

    And just in case you thought I was making that up...

    http://www.aspiesforfreedom.com/index.php

  21. It's not that bad! by timster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been taking this drug for years. I'll tell ya, having three or four mouth sores at all times helps you lose weight! And when you can't come to work for a month because of a raging... common cold, your idiot boss totally understands!

    Sigh... luckily, these days, I'm on a lower dosage (and with a different boss).

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    1. Re:It's not that bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you're on them because of a transplant, so you can't stop. Someone with retardation could stop when they get sick and start again later. Sure it wouldn't be fun, but losing inelegance for a while wouldn't kill them (unlike tissue rejection).

  22. Should Mod to Funny... by tjstork · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your estimate is high. Only 50.7% require it.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_US_presidential_election [wikipedia.org]

    I'm a Republican, a Bush and now McCain supporter, and have more troll points on slashdot to prove my right wing cred, and I don't find this offensive at all. Come on people, lighten up. This was -funny-. If I would have been first to the joke, I would have made the same crack going the other way. The more seriously we take our political affiliations, the more we are trapped into the political parties that really don't represent us!

    After all, can't we say: "Christ, Bush is such a great oil man, that he goes and invades the world's largest untapped source of oil, and now gas is $5 / gallon."

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Should Mod to Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think McCain is a good man with bad ideas.

      Tax cuts for the rich work *wonders* for a young economy that has lots of competing small businesses in every industry.

      Such tax cuts do *nothing* for a mature economy in which each industry is dominated by a monopoly or cartel.

      I don't have a problem with sound economic theories and proven economic policies. I have a proven with their application to an economic environment in which they have been equally proven to be ineffective.

    2. Re:Should Mod to Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Cool. I'm independent and I thought that was funny also but it did need a come back

      (after all, anybody with a party name tattooed to their forehead does need help to have some smugness wiped away) -

      what I was tempted to say was that perhaps the ones who put Kerry in the running require that treatment -

      after all, Kerry was the man who LOST by ****popular vote**** {geez!} to (as some people describe Bush as) "the worst president in history" - in his second term!

      Hello, a viable choice was needed then - yo - Democrats wake up.....

    3. Re:Should Mod to Funny... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      After all, can't we say: "Christ, Bush is such a great oil man, that he goes and invades the world's largest untapped source of oil, and now gas is $5 / gallon."

      It's already at $5 where you are? Fsck.

      But it was never about making oil cheap to the consumer. It's about denying oil to the U.S.'s economic-political rivals, and about profits for oil corporations.

      Big oil is doing very well, with profits at high levels, and a new round of no-bid contracts going out in Iraq they're finally getting back into the part of the game Iraq kicked them out of decades ago.

      The investment class isn't much impacted by paying $100 instead of $50 to fill their SUV, that's chump change.

      So, yeah, Bush is a hell of an oil man. He's done wonders for the industry.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    4. Re:Should Mod to Funny... by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      ax cuts for the rich work *wonders* for a young economy that has lots of competing small businesses in every industry. Such tax cuts do *nothing* for a mature economy in which each industry is dominated by a monopoly or cartel.

      [citation needed]

      Besides, monopolization != maturation.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    5. Re:Should Mod to Funny... by azav · · Score: 1

      I'm a Republican, a Bush and now McCain supporter,

      Honestly, WHY?

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    6. Re:Should Mod to Funny... by Britz · · Score: 1

      I do know some conservatives over here in Germany. And I am libertarian myself. Used to be liberal. So I can understand conservatives. I have no problem with Republicans. I mean what is the difference between the big US parties anyways? But G. W. Bush? I know Kerry was a douche and Gore invented the Internets, but Bush??? I mean McCain is smart. You might disagree with him or not, that is politics. But Bush? I saw a documentary (filmed on the campaing trail) and thought, gee, I would probabely like to have a beer with him, but not ever run a little city, much less a whole country.

      Maybe it's just me, but I don't get why anyone would ever seriously consider voting for W.

    7. Re:Should Mod to Funny... by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      I'm a Republican, a Bush and now McCain supporter, and have more troll points on slashdot to prove my right wing cred, and I don't find this offensive at all. Come on people, lighten up. This was -funny-. If I would have been first to the joke, I would have made the same crack going the other way.

      The funny thing is... I voted for Bush in 2004, although supported Gore in 2000.

      Btw, I'm now independent and 100% undecided on 2008.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
  23. So will it be cheaper than treating the cause? by Rooked_One · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if so... consider it for mice only. I've been waiting years for something that has proven in mice, but just "never seems to cross that gap" to humans.

    But then again, when you consider a does of medication that costs 3000 dollars, why would anyone want to cure such a profitable disorder?

    1. Re:So will it be cheaper than treating the cause? by T3Tech · · Score: 1
      Exactly, this is great news for mice, but I'm sure they don't really care that much anyway.

      Now if they can figure out a way to make researchers and those that approve funding for such nonsense smart enough to realize what many others in the field have known for quite some time, they may be onto something.

      There is more money to be made in the treatment of symptoms (and having some foundation to raise money purportedly for a cure) than there is in any actual cure, which is the reason that no cure for anything will be televised.

      Animal research does not work, as every species of animal is a different biomechanical and biochemical entity. Non-human animals are different not only from humans, but also from each other: anatomically, physiologically, immunologically, genetically and histologically. Animals react differently to different drugs, vaccines and chemical substances, not only from humans but also from each other. Aspirin kills cats and penicillin kills guinea pigs. Yet guinea pigs can safely eat strychnine - one of the deadliest poisons for humans but not for monkeys. Human diseases cannot be recreated in animals because once a disease is "recreated" it is artificial and no longer the original, natural disease that the body itself produced. Our environment - air, land, water and food supplies - is being systematically destroyed by thousands of pesticides and toxicants that no matter how destructive are routinely and conveniently found safe and thus allowed to be marketed based on inherently invalid and misleading animal tests. - 1999 Cancer Research Review


      There's probably dozens of doctors and researchers that have said basically the same thing publicly.

      --
      Of course I didn't RTFA... why would I do that? You really are new here aren't you? Don't let my UID fool you.
  24. TSC Data by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1
    Quick search of AutismSpeaks.org for TSC turned up this:

    Tuberous Sclerosis
    Individuals with Tuberous Sclerosis (TS) suffer from learning and behavioral deficits akin to those observed in autism as well as epilepsy. In TS, depending on the study, up to 60% of patients also meet the diagnostic criteria for autism. The defective genes are TSC1 (hamartin) and TSC2 (tuberin) which normally function in a complex of molecules important in cell growth and division. The complex is a suppressor of mTOR signaling. The link to autism turns out to be the PTEN molecule, which similarly functions as a suppressor of mTOR signaling. Some individuals with autism have been found to have mutations in the PTEN gene. Mice deficient in the mouse PTEN gene display autism-like behaviors, as do mice that have low levels of TSC1 and TSC2. Importantly, there is a drug that can function like PTEN, TSC1 and TSC2 in suppressing mTOR -- rapamycin. In the animal models, rapamycin normalizes learning deficits and reverses some of the abnormal phenotypes. Therefore, rapamycin is undergoing clinical trials to determine whether it can be an effective medication to alleviate the symptoms of TS. (Drs. Alcino Silva, Kevin Ess and Luis Parada)

    Not exactly what you asked for, but essentially the reverse relationship.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  25. ha! by scoopr · · Score: 1

    Cure for the internet!

  26. Re:Can this be used in politics? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    I would consider it mandatory for anybody who wants to vote. Since he didn't get to be president without being voted for. He was elected twice. It's a really sad state of affairs when the country that touts the strengths of democracy, has a leader with such a low approval rating.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  27. By November for the US? by svendsen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can we get this drug to the majority of the US voters before November please?

    1. Re:By November for the US? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It doesn't matter how smart the electorate is when neither option is at all that good. Although on both sides, it seems be be a lot better this time around, it still seems like most of the politicians are completely corrupt.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:By November for the US? by svendsen · · Score: 1

      I agree...too bad we don't have the option of "none of the above". Oh well I wonder which candidate will by me lunch after screwing me...

    3. Re:By November for the US? by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      You seem to have a rather poor opinion of Obama supporters.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    4. Re:By November for the US? by a_real_bast... · · Score: 1
      --
      You're making me think. You won't like me when I'm thinking.
  28. Does it work in smaller doses? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    How many would you have to take before you can correctly pronounce "nuclear"? Because I can think of at least one really important person who needs to learn that already.

    --
    stuff |
  29. repeat by groovybomb · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've already read Flowers for Algernon

  30. Oh, Please by encoderer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look at you. Sitting there, presumably in full control of your faculties, able to socialize, to date, to start and raise a family, to use your time as you wish, to banter back and forth on websites, or read a book, to build a career and take pride in your accomplishments, to further your education and expand your horizons.

    Do you even KNOW anybody who suffers from any of these mild-to-mid-grade mental deficiencies? And I don't mean know OF, I mean KNOW and care for?

    If you did, you'd see very clearly the tragedy that is a person who much of the time seems completely healthy and normal.

    Wouldn't it be GREAT if pharma would give these things away for free? Sure. But this world today is not perfect. And you can't expect just a single industry to "disarm" and go socialized. Even if it WOULD benefit us all.

    There's a test you can apply here: When a pharma company spends $1bn researching a drug that ends-up a flop, should we as taxpayers refund that cash to them? If the answer is "no," then you can't begrudge them for taking profits where they can.

    And as much as I hate paying $4 for gas, I could say the same about oil: I don't know about you, but 8, 9 years ago when gas was $0.85/gallon, I never decided to pay $1.50 just to help out. Oil companies collapsed and consolodated when Oil was $20/barrel and now, I can't begrudge them for taking profits where they can.

    Remember, nearly all of us are shareholders in these companies, whether directly, thru a 401k, thru a pension, thru a union, thru your local government which often invests a portion of its cash-on-hand, etc.

    So the drug costs $1k. That's the reality of it. To suggest that being a "slave to the pharma industry" is as bad as being a prisoner of your own reduced faculties shows an abject lack of understanding, not to mention, a serious empathy deficit.

    1. Re:Oh, Please by InDi0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a test you can apply here: When a pharma company spends $1bn researching a drug that ends-up a flop, should we as taxpayers refund that cash to them? If the answer is "no," then you can't begrudge them for taking profits where they can.

      You have, in fact, paid for that $1bn of "failed" research. You have paid it by tax money, and you have paid it by buying viagra,anti-depressants or any "lifestyle" drug for that matter. You have paid it because your government is protecting the patents of big farma, everyday, everywhere in the planet.

      Yet you still don't "get" it, and you sympathize for the money "lost" in research. Exploratory Research into new drugs can never "fail". Its exploratory, and the benefits may or may not come.

      A cure for those you love wont come from private companies, unless you tend to love people in the market segments that managers tend to love.

    2. Re:Oh, Please by east+coast · · Score: 1

      When you invest hundreds of millions of dollars into a project that doesn't earn a single dime it's considered a failure by most peoples standards. Sure, you gain some knowledge from the failure and that's great but money is needed to build off of that knowledge.

      Tell you what, you and all the naysayers to this process get together. You all throw some money into a hat and start your own pharmaceutical company and when you come up with cures you go ahead and make them public domain. If you hate the existing system don't just sit on your hands, if you have a solution apply it to the situation.

      Yeah, I don't see many reaching for their checkbooks on that. Go figure.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    3. Re:Oh, Please by Ripit · · Score: 1

      Well said, sir. Mod to 5 please.

    4. Re:Oh, Please by InDi0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Changing the way society performs economic relations is not something five people can gather and do. It takes a deep social change to do experiments like the one you propose.

      I'm not a naysayer of the drug. I 'm a naysayer of the process. And of the people that say "Oh will please think of billion-dollar-rich-cigar-holding-government-overthrowing Pharma CEOs?"

      Don't argue with me about. Just ponder at the fact that deseases like malaria kill millions, while Pharma is fighting poor erections. If you think that makes sense, or that this is the only way society can work, you are too pessimistic.

    5. Re:Oh, Please by EvolutionsPeak · · Score: 1

      This is the most reasonable post I've ever read on Slashdot.

    6. Re:Oh, Please by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      There's a test you can apply here: When a pharma company spends $1bn researching a drug that ends-up a flop, should we as taxpayers refund that cash to them? If the answer is "no," then you can't begrudge them for taking profits where they can.

      And as much as I hate paying $4 for gas, I could say the same about oil: I don't know about you, but 8, 9 years ago when gas was $0.85/gallon, I never decided to pay $1.50 just to help out. Oil companies collapsed and consolodated when Oil was $20/barrel and now, I can't begrudge them for taking profits where they can.

      I begrudge anyone who with an excessive income. There are people in this world who live on a few dollars a day. Others make hundreds of millions (or even billions!) per year. What right does someone have to concentrate economic power in their hands so much that they could in theory support millions of people?

      The Public paid for and built those roads that the rich people use to make their money. The Public educated their employees. The Public consumes their products and media. The Public fights their wars for them.

      How quickly the rich forget their debt to the Public, demanding that we take not a cent of their precious money in return for the glorious lifestyle the Public enables. When their power becomes so concentrated that the Public cannot support itself anymore, they will see exactly how much they owed to the Public.

      There's only so much room on the street before the fat cats push everyone into the ditch. The fatter the cats, the less room on the street for everyone else.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    7. Re:Oh, Please by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that it's better to be a policymaker if you're personally affected and emotionally involved in a situation.

    8. Re:Oh, Please by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Changing the way society performs economic relations is not something five people can gather and do. It takes a deep social change to do experiments like the one you propose.

      Five people? Fuck, we've had two of you in this thread alone! What about the millions of Joe Sixpacks on the street that bitch about it? Face facts, there's tons of you out there who don't understand nor do you care to understand the industry. Ok, so out of the millions of you guys you think you could pull together a billion dollars and give it a go. If you're successful maybe more would help in the future. You know the numbers are out there, why do you think it's a big news issue? If you can't make a "deep social change" with millions of people and billions of dollars than how can you downplay the process that exists today?

      I'm not a naysayer of the drug. I 'm a naysayer of the process. And of the people that say "Oh will please think of billion-dollar-rich-cigar-holding-government-overthrowing Pharma CEOs?"

      I'm saying to be realistic about the process. You know there is a viable alternative, I've presented it to you in short form. What's stopping you and the millions of others who are singing the same tune? Go for it!

      Don't argue with me about. Just ponder at the fact that deseases like malaria kill millions, while Pharma is fighting poor erections. If you think that makes sense, or that this is the only way society can work, you are too pessimistic.

      Why not argue? I've been in this debate many times and I've heard just about all the excuses that come from people about why they hate this and that and why they're unwilling to put their money where their mouth is. You're all fantastic on coming up with a solution but are unwilling to lay down a little green to show us that you have faith in your own solution. Who's the real naysayer here?

      And as far as erections? It goes even further to show how very little you understand the industry and how little you invest into your own ideals about exploratory research. Viagra was originally being researched as a compound to lessen hypertension and angina! You mean to tell me that, in the name of exploratory research, if you don't find a solution for one problem you should ignore another? Please. If you do it's a clear sign that you don't understand the real focus of exploratory research at all.

      As for malaria? Malaria is not a single disease, much like HIV there are many mutation and variants. There are effective medications for some strains but not for others. A real problem for the sufferers of Malaria is the kinds of jackasses who make up fake drugs and peddle them on the black market. These people are trying to treat themselves with sugar pills thinking that they're curing themselves as the situation only gets worse. How can you blame the pharmaceutical industry for that?

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    9. Re:Oh, Please by wiggles · · Score: 2, Funny

      in full control of your faculties, able to socialize, to date, to start and raise a family

      If you think this is the kind of people who hang out here, you must be new.

    10. Re:Oh, Please by InDi0 · · Score: 1

      I 'm not blaming anybody dude. Any company in the present socio-economic system will do and should do them same.

      That's what the free market is all about and that is how capitalism works. If a company doesn't go the way Joe Sixpack "hates", it wont stay afloat.

      What I'm saying is that curing people by using money/profit as the incentive does not work. I would go as far as saying that using profit as an incentive for anything at all is grotesque.

      But you are probably a north american white male, so I wont say such things in front of you. I will probably hurt your most basic fetishes.

    11. Re:Oh, Please by figa · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as a flop in the pharma industry. If they spend the money to do research, they sure as hell spend the money to get the clinical trials come out the way they want.

      Think I'm exaggerating? Check out the latest research regarding Prozac.

      Besides that, $1bn is chump change for research these days. Gillette claims to have spent $750 million on R&D for the Mach 3 razor, and these were pretty reasonably priced, even when they were introduced. Pharma pricing is all about inelastic demand, and it needs to either be moderated through collective bargaining at the national level or outright regulation.

      I'm willing to take the hit "thru" my 401k.

    12. Re:Oh, Please by east+coast · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is that curing people by using money/profit as the incentive does not work. I would go as far as saying that using profit as an incentive for anything at all is grotesque.

      Call it grotesque all you want, but don't say it doesn't work but it sure as hell does. It's not perfect, we don't exist in a Star Trek society, but it does work. Medical technology has come so far in the last couple of decades it should amaze most people. Instead we have people who do nothing but look at the flaws in it and claim that it doesn't work at all. The 1 glaring failure out of the 99 successes and you want to condemn them for it? I bet you don't have as good of a track record as the pharmaceutical industry. If you did you probably wouldn't have the time to waste here bitching about it.

      But you are probably a north american white male, so I wont say such things in front of you. I will probably hurt your most basic fetishes.

      Ah, the retort of a sore loser. Thanks for the racist sentiments but I'll keep on being a plain old human who has more to be happy for than to bitch about.

      It's sad that you tell me to sit and ponder what you have to say but you dismiss me based on my assumed ethnic background. Spoken like a true thinker. If this is the best you can do maybe you need to sit back and ponder some yourself.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    13. Re:Oh, Please by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      Your logic only works if you believe there is a free market in pharmaceuticals (or oil, or...).

      Patents guarantee the exact opposite situation. Now I'm not saying we should do away with patents entirely, all I'm saying is don't be surprised when people who care about using the free market to deal with societies problems get a little bit pissed off when government intervention does the exact opposite of what it is supposed to do.

      Patents are corporate welfare (or for want of a better way to put it, corporate socialism). If we are going to have a form of socialism I'd rather one that benefits more people, not less.

    14. Re:Oh, Please by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      What incentive would The Public have had to build all that infrastructure and to advance knowledge to the point where a big pharmaceutical company could make excessive profits on a lifesaving drug?

      Judging from human nature, and human history, you've got two choices: The Carrot (to possibility of some day being enormously wealthy... Or at least to be somewhat wealthy), and The Stick (some form of totalitarian regime).

      How quickly The Public seems to have forgotten that we chose the carrot. At the very least we could realize that many societies have, and continue to prefer the carrot to the stick.

      Be careful when you begrudge that which makes your lifestyle possible. (Yes. your lifestyle. You did, after all, use a computer to post your comment, so I'm making zero assumptions about your lifestyle when I say it was enabled by the same framework which creates those you begrudge.)

    15. Re:Oh, Please by encoderer · · Score: 1

      You can't fix problem in the Pharma industry without addressing the system-wide problems in the healthcare industry.

      A national health plan would go a long way to fixing the gripes people have. Repeal the idiotic law, signed by Bush, that forbids the Gov't for negotiating better prices on pharmaceuticals, open Medicare to every American for a monthly fee (just like a corporate plan), and problem solved.

      Another fifty million people (at least) would join Medicare, adding to the tens of millions already on the plan. That would give them leverage to negotiate lower drug prices.

      The remaining insurers would have to stay competitive with the Gov't plan, which would shape them up as well.

      But that should be the extent of it, in my opinion.

      I think healthcare should be a basic right of a US citizen. But cutting edge phama? I honestly think people have an unfair sense of entitlement here.

      Drugs are EXPENSIVE to produce. Nobody is FORCED to go research and develop a new drug. But as soon as it's invented, people just feel like they should HAVE IT, NOW, CHEAPLY.

      And about your Gillette example, the same thing applies. I pay $22 for my razor blades. I think it's WAY over-priced. But if the Mach3 failed in the marketplace, I wouldn't feel compelled to bail them out for that failure. So I can't begrudge them from taking a profit on it.

    16. Re:Oh, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) All corporations will ALWAYS take as much money as they can. You can rationalize it all you want, but it is profiteering and it does hurt a lot of people.
      2) The drug companies need to stay in business and that means two things: money in the bank and money for research. If they don't have both they won't be here in ten years and then we all lose.

      Those two truths are the reality of the corporate system in the USA. We hate the big corporations (Drugs, food, oil, etc) because they profiteer and gouge, but we can't survive without them. This is why socialism has been tried so often.

    17. Re:Oh, Please by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1
      "we don't exist in a Star Trek society"

      And I, for one, am grateful. It'd creep me out if every other person I ran into looked like they'd been hit in the face with a latex pie...

    18. Re:Oh, Please by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

      But who cares if people are dying of malaria on the other side of the planet? Poor erections affect me!

      Um...wait.

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    19. Re:Oh, Please by encoderer · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between turning a profit and "profiteering" (which has negative connotation, ie "war profiteering").

      And I disagree that it hurts people. So you can't afford a drug that didn't exist yesterday anyway? Or if you can't afford gas, don't buy a car?

      Don't get me wrong, I think every American should be covered under a nat'l health plan, and I hope we have an economy strong enough to give every one of us a fair shot at good, middle-class life, car included.

      But there is no perfect way. France has some incredible social programs. Yet, taxes are ridiculous and unemployment is always double-digits. That hurts people, too.

      Capitalism is synonymous with "profit motive." I've always been of the belief that any motivation is good motivation.

      But I agree with everything else you said.

    20. Re:Oh, Please by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand. In my post, I did not begrudge capitalism, but greedy Americans.

      I know exactly what I owe to the Public. And in comparison to someone who makes hundreds of millions of dollars a year, I only make several tens of thousands. And I am happy with my wage because it makes living very easy. I have no complaints against the taxes I have to pay to enable this style of life, even with my meager salary.

      No, what I hate is the person who cries bloody murder because you want to take away some small percentage of their millions. It's not like their life is a struggle, and most of them aren't even really using it anyway. No, they demand loopholes in the tax code and government subsidies so that they can avoid paying their dues, further concentrating money in their own hands.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    21. Re:Oh, Please by figa · · Score: 1

      I hear you on that, and I'm all for it. I'm trying not to get my hopes up too much, even if Obama wins by a landslide.

      Drugs are expensive to research, but I'm not entirely clear on how much of that research is already state or nationally funded. Production probably costs about the same as jujubees once the clinical trials are done. Patent protection is largely what keeps drugs more expensive than jujubees.

      I also imagine drugs would be a lot less expensive if the manufacturers weren't allowed to market them. They shouldn't be creating demand, and they shouldn't be adding in the cost of marketing for those who actually need the medication.

      I have to admit, I don't use the Mach 3. I buy the generic two-blade razors. I think they're expensive because of the shelf-space cabal that left us with a razor duopoly.

    22. Re:Oh, Please by Bananas · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is that curing people by using money/profit as the incentive does not work. I would go as far as saying that using profit as an incentive for anything at all is grotesque. Call it grotesque all you want, but don't say it doesn't work but it sure as hell does. It's not perfect, we don't exist in a Star Trek society, but it does work. Medical technology has come so far in the last couple of decades it should amaze most people. Instead we have people who do nothing but look at the flaws in it and claim that it doesn't work at all. The 1 glaring failure out of the 99 successes and you want to condemn them for it? I bet you don't have as good of a track record as the pharmaceutical industry. If you did you probably wouldn't have the time to waste here bitching about it.

      To the first (italics) poster, agreed. Pretty obvious that the medical system state-side is broken to the core and will continue to be so as long as we (a) think of health care as a luxury (b) make doctors pay out six digits in college costs (c) have doctors cover for negligent staffers that should get the hell out of the industry, but won't, because they can't afford to.

      To the next reply, What's that smell?

      Medical technology has come so far...(#1)that we have to import tech from Europe that should have been here years ago, or take trips to Canada to do the same procedure for less money? (#2) That treatment for autism in India is light-years ahead of the US? (#3) That privatized healthcare is bankrupting families?

      99% success rate? WTF? How did you manage to reach up into your asshole deep enough to pull something from your spleen? My mother is dying from fucking lung cancer because her doctor ignored her requests not once, twice, thrice, but FOUR FUCKING TIMES to have her hip joints examined. We're talking about cancer that could have been treated aggressively with a better than 80% survival rate, provided the doctor wasn't a complete fucking quack!

      Ok, let's also pre-emptively put our cards on the table before you even reply. My wife's back could be permanently fixed with new medical devices that you can't get here in the states (but it's available in Europe), including a complete replacement for defective vertebrae (answers #1). My autistic son fights an uphill battle while people my wife knows from India have been able to all but completely cure their son of it (answers #2). And I'm in debt and nearly bankrupt, not because I bought a house on speculation or too many bigscreen flat TV's or some other bullshit that Americans whine about - no, I'm almost bankrupt from fucking multi-thousand-dollar medical bills (answers #3).

      There you go, backed up every one of my assertions with EMPERICAL EXPERIENCE. Attempting to tell me that the didn't happen, or aren't true, would indicate that you have a SEVERE DISCONNECT FROM REALITY because I FUCKING EXPERIENCED IT. In short: stop drinking the goddamn corpo-rightist-facist-mass-media-group-think koolaid. Go do your homework. And get the fuck off my lawn.

    23. Re:Oh, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sore loser? You're the one that called me Joe Sixpack, so please.

      I do realize what you say, I 'm not stupid not see all the real world examples of how far we are compared with a century back.

      This is a definite and amazing improvement.

      Its just not the end of line. Its not that its not perfect, its that its fundamentally wrong. And I'm not talking about Pharma, I'm talking about the "free" market. Human suffering cannot be measured by marketeers, and the good of society is rarely associated with profit.

      And give me a break with the "put your money where your mouth is". It is irrelevant to what I'm saying.

      Ahhh...Arguing on the Internet again...Its like riding a bike, you never forget it.

    24. Re:Oh, Please by Bananas · · Score: 1

      I have full control of my faculties, I socialize, I have dated (many times!) and I have started a family. I am not new here. Get off my lawn.

    25. Re:Oh, Please by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Just ponder at the fact that deseases like malaria kill millions, while Pharma is fighting poor erections.

      You do realize that those people came from erections, don't you?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    26. Re:Oh, Please by InDi0 · · Score: 1

      Sore loser? You're the one that called me Joe Sixpack, so please.

      I do realize what you say, I 'm not stupid not see all the real world examples of how far we are compared with a century back.

      This is a definite and amazing improvement.

      Its just not the end of line. Its not that its not perfect, its that its fundamentally wrong. And I'm not talking about Pharma, I'm talking about the "free" market. Human suffering cannot be measured by marketeers, and the good of society is rarely associated with profit.

      And give me a break with the "put your money where your mouth is". It is irrelevant to what I'm saying.

      Ahhh...Arguing on the Internet again...Its like riding a bike, you never forget it.

      (posted this as anonymous, so here it is again)

    27. Re:Oh, Please by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Sore loser? You're the one that called me Joe Sixpack, so please.

      Quote me. Quote me where I called you Joe Sixpack. And does that alone justify your racism?

      Its just not the end of line. Its not that its not perfect, its that its fundamentally wrong. And I'm not talking about Pharma, I'm talking about the "free" market. Human suffering cannot be measured by marketeers, and the good of society is rarely associated with profit.

      Exactly as I thought, you'll bitch about the model but you won't lift a finger to change it.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    28. Re:Oh, Please by east+coast · · Score: 1

      To the first (italics) poster, agreed. Pretty obvious that the medical system state-side is broken to the core and will continue to be so as long as we (a) think of health care as a luxury (b) make doctors pay out six digits in college costs (c) have doctors cover for negligent staffers that should get the hell out of the industry, but won't, because they can't afford to.

      Bullshit. The insurance industry is a far cry from the medical industry. Learn the difference.

      Medical technology has come so far...(#1)that we have to import tech from Europe that should have been here years ago, or take trips to Canada to do the same procedure for less money? (#2) That treatment for autism in India is light-years ahead of the US? (#3) That privatized healthcare is bankrupting families?

      Oh, not everything in the world is invented here in the US. Is that a big problem for you? Do you think there is no medical industry in Europe? I never said that American healthcare is better than anyone else. Where the hell did you get that from?

      99% success rate? WTF? How did you manage to reach up into your asshole deep enough to pull something from your spleen? My mother is dying from fucking lung cancer because her doctor ignored her requests not once, twice, thrice, but FOUR FUCKING TIMES to have her hip joints examined. We're talking about cancer that could have been treated aggressively with a better than 80% survival rate, provided the doctor wasn't a complete fucking quack!

      What does fuck does this have to do with the pharmaceutical industry?

      Ok, let's also pre-emptively put our cards on the table before you even reply. My wife's back could be permanently fixed with new medical devices that you can't get here in the states (but it's available in Europe), including a complete replacement for defective vertebrae (answers #1). My autistic son fights an uphill battle while people my wife knows from India have been able to all but completely cure their son of it (answers #2). And I'm in debt and nearly bankrupt, not because I bought a house on speculation or too many bigscreen flat TV's or some other bullshit that Americans whine about - no, I'm almost bankrupt from fucking multi-thousand-dollar medical bills (answers #3).

      Again, what does this have to do with the pharmacudical industry?

      There you go, backed up every one of my assertions with EMPERICAL EXPERIENCE. Attempting to tell me that the didn't happen, or aren't true, would indicate that you have a SEVERE DISCONNECT FROM REALITY because I FUCKING EXPERIENCED IT. In short: stop drinking the goddamn corpo-rightist-facist-mass-media-group-think koolaid. Go do your homework. And get the fuck off my lawn.

      No, what you did is tried to substitute empirical evidence with antidote. It just doesn't work that way.

      You may be having a tough of it but I know tons of people who did just fine. You're not the only person involved so don't act like you are. Not to mention that most of your bullshit was outside of the circle of the discussion and the fact that you couldn't be bothered to match me point for point. You're trying to blame an industry for something that isn't within their scope.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    29. Re:Oh, Please by InDi0 · · Score: 1

      Well, you likened my opinion to Joe Sixpack's. And get racism straight: its racism when you imply that somebody is inferior because of his race. Implying that someone is better off financially because he is an american white male is not racist. The plantation workers were racist because they called their bosses slaveowners?

      Exactly as I thought, you'll bitch about the model but you won't lift a finger to change it.

      Whatever dude. I'm talking about transforming society to a place where there need not be forms of economic oppression. This requires a radical shift from where we are now, as a socio-economic system. It has nothing to do with me putting money in research. We are talking politics here.

    30. Re:Oh, Please by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Well, you likened my opinion to Joe Sixpack's.

      Oh my! What a rip! I like Coca Cola. So does Joe Sixpack! Woe is me! What I was really saying is that tons of people think the same way you do, not just Slashdotters.

      And get racism straight: its racism when you imply that somebody is inferior because of his race. Implying that someone is better off financially because he is an american white male is not racist. The plantation workers were racist because they called their bosses slaveowners?

      Slave owner is a position, not a race. Learn the difference. What you said was racist.

      Whatever dude. I'm talking about transforming society to a place where there need not be forms of economic oppression. This requires a radical shift from where we are now, as a socio-economic system. It has nothing to do with me putting money in research. We are talking politics here.

      No, we were talking pharmaceuticals and research. Maybe you changed the subject midstream but you certainly never made it seem that way. Oh well, try to defend your defenceless stance. I know it's bullshit.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    31. Re:Oh, Please by Bananas · · Score: 1
      To the first (italics) poster, agreed. Pretty obvious that the medical system state-side is broken to the core and will continue to be so as long as we (a) think of health care as a luxury (b) make doctors pay out six digits in college costs (c) have doctors cover for negligent staffers that should get the hell out of the industry, but won't, because they can't afford to.

      Bullshit. The insurance industry is a far cry from the medical industry. Learn the difference.

      Good dope you're smoking. Where did I say insurance? And I even quoted the original paragraph for context.

      Oh, not everything in the world is invented here in the US. Is that a big problem for you?

      Only if I can't get access to it. I really don't care if it developed in upper get-out-of-fuckmonistan, if it works, why isn't it available, world-wide? Funny how you paint me as nationalistic but your own rhetoric excels in that fashion.

      What does fuck does this have to do with the pharmaceutical industry?

      Medical technology has come so far in the last couple of decades it should amaze most people. Instead we have people who do nothing but look at the flaws in it and claim that it doesn't work at all. The 1 glaring failure out of the 99 successes and you want to condemn them for it? I think you confused yourself. You didn't talk about pharma in the original sentence that I was replying to. You talked about medical technology - and by extension, medicine.

      No, what you did is tried to substitute empirical evidence with antidote.

      So what I experience is not empirical evidence? What kind of double-plus-good-duckspeak bullshit is this?

      Forget it. It's not worth discussing anymore.

    32. Re:Oh, Please by InDi0 · · Score: 1

      OK. Stick to your love of "The System". I hope that greed never hits your family and beloved. That doesn't mean of course that it won't hit millions of others. But you seem to accept that as the "only way the system can work".

    33. Re:Oh, Please by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Like I said, there is another way but I don't see any of you people doing it. So much for your idealism. You sit there and think you're virtuous for not liking the system but you sure as hell won't do a damn thing about it. I side with people who have a plan and put it to work, not big talkers.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    34. Re:Oh, Please by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Good dope you're smoking. Where did I say insurance? And I even quoted the original paragraph for context.

      You spoke of doctors having to cover (as in liability insurance) for negligent staff and healthcare as a luxury (client insurance).

      Only if I can't get access to it. I really don't care if it developed in upper get-out-of-fuckmonistan, if it works, why isn't it available, world-wide? Funny how you paint me as nationalistic but your own rhetoric excels in that fashion.

      Uh, I said nothing nationalist. You made a beef with everything not being made here ("that we have to import tech from Europe that should have been here years ago" to quote you, you don't mention that isn't available here, you mention importing). And if you're talking pharmicudicals you can't blame them either, it's the FDA who determines that regardless of the best intentions of the industry.

      I think you confused yourself. You didn't talk about pharma in the original sentence that I was replying to. You talked about medical technology - and by extension, medicine.

      I will say it was bad wording, and that is my fault. But it's still better tech than most people know. You point out Canada and Europe, why is it these people are coming here for treatment of advanced conditions? Perhaps for long standing procedures you'd be correct but the advanced side has brought plenty of people into the US for treatment. I see it regularly on the news. And it has certainly advanced by leaps and bounds compared to where it was just a couple of decades ago.

      So what I experience is not empirical evidence? What kind of double-plus-good-duckspeak bullshit is this?

      It's a very small part of a large picture. Experiments with only one variable are far from science and you know it.

      Forget it. It's not worth discussing anymore.

      It's because you know you're full of shit. Thanks for marking me as a freak, it shows that you hate people you disagree with. It makes you easier to spot as a troll.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    35. Re:Oh, Please by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Guess what...
      1. I had such a problem MYSELF!
      2. Doctors only recommended life-long drug addiction trough symptom treatment to me. They literally were addictive to the level that gave you "brain-zaps" when you stopped taking them!
      3. I solved it myself after years of work and pain, by fixing the primordial cause.
      4. I have yet to have my first date because of that problem, and I'm 29. But now my chances are pretty high. because my whole life changed.

      Wohohooo... hip hip ho-fuckin-ray!
      I'm in shame for sitting here and being in full control of myself again! You're so great oh master of knowing-it-all.

      P.S.: If I did not know that you simply took your flawed experience and judged me by it, I'd call you an asshole.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    36. Re:Oh, Please by encoderer · · Score: 1

      Guess what...
      1. I didn't judge you.
      2. By "brain zaps" it lends me to think you're talking about an SSRI or MAOI.
      3. If that's the case you weren't being treated for mental retardation, you were most likely being treated for a neurosis of some sort.
      4. Even if you were being treated for mental retardation, i wasn't judging you. I was defending you. You have to read the entire thread.
      5. You experience with a pharma maintenance therapy is not necessarily indicative of everybody elses.

  31. Wake me up when... by j.sanchez1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wake me up when they find a cure for severe retardedness. I'll buy enough for everyone at the office.

    --
    Speedy thing goes in; speedy thing comes out.
    1. Re:Wake me up when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a shame it won't improve your vocabulary. The word is "retardation". Refer to the title of the page

  32. tempted to agree by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

    Except he voted in Roberts to the Supreme Court and not only voted him in but was one of his biggest supporters.

    1. Re:tempted to agree by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make him dishonest. It doesn't even demonstrate disloyalty to his constituency. It only demonstrates that he doesn't hold the stereotypical Democrat view in all things, apparently including drugs and abortions. I'm fine with that, I don't hold the Democrat view in all things either, specifically drugs and guns.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    2. Re:tempted to agree by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

      Very persuasive. I will reconsider my point.

  33. flowers for algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who will be the first charlie?

  34. But can it reverse retardation... by Amisinthe · · Score: 1

    in Slashdot posts?

  35. Charley? by Rinisari · · Score: 1

    Algernon?

  36. I know it is not fashionable to point this out by VisiX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps it is not all the fault of the school system?

    I'm sure it is difficult to raise two children who are quite different in ability, but I feel like someone should point out that a number of people with an IQ of 130+ (and perhaps 65) graduate from public school and go on to do wonderful things. I would venture a guess that many people here have an IQ over 130, were incredibly bored in high school, and came through it just fine.

    I have an IQ of about 140 and got Bs in high school. My parents understood that I would not be wasting a lot of effort "learning" in high school and gave me the freedom to do other things outside of school so that I would have an outlet. These opportunities were not afforded to my older brother, who has a similar IQ, and so he dropped out of high school after failing ninth grade four times.

    1. Re:I know it is not fashionable to point this out by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      My IQ was 142 in school (it's more like 130 now, I suffered brain damage from an auto accident in 1976). I always got good grades, and went on to college, but the system failed me regardless. Once they taught me to read there is little they taught me afterwards; I'd already read it. My math teachers thought I must be really smart because I knew how to use a slide rule and they didn't; it was more akin to cheating (this was before pocket calculators).

      My boredom got me in trouble a lot. I was a real pain in the ass to teachers, who I'd ask questions of that they not only didn't know the answers to but didn't know where to find the answers.

      In fact, some of the things journaled here would see me in jail if I was in school now (the hydrogen experiment).

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:I know it is not fashionable to point this out by Rycross · · Score: 1

      That sort-of reminds me of my elementary school days. My parents took me to a specialist to get tested and see if I needed to be put on Ritalin. I also found out that the reason they did so was because my teachers were pushing very hard for it. You see, after getting bored about learning about addition for the third time, I decided that paying attention in class was not worth my while, and started advancing to higher level material.

      But see, I still aced all my tests and finished my homework, so they couldn't just give me a bad grade. I wasn't giving them the amount of attention they "deserved," and they couldn't punish me by giving me bad grades, so they decided that the best course of action was drugging me up. Luckily the specialist said that there was nothing wrong with me, other than having a low tolerance for boredom.

    3. Re:I know it is not fashionable to point this out by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      This is why my kid cannot go to public school. He started reading at 2. (just before turning 3) Now, at 4 he reads as well as most of the kids from my 5th or 6th grade class, and as well as some that I went to high school with. He is well into 1st grade math, has been comfortable using his computer since he was 1, installed Linux for the first time soon after his second birthday (although that has more to do with how brain dead easy Ubuntu is to install than how smart he is), has built several simple small electronic projects with no adult intervention, etc, etc, etc...

      So, as a typical dad, I believe it is safe to say that he is smart. That being said. I cannot imagine how much of a problem he would be if he were put into a public school. They would hate him, and he would hate them. I know if I went to a training course today, and the first day, the instructor said "Today we will be reviewing the letter A. We hope to cover the whole alphabet after a years worth of study." I would get up and leave. How could I expect anything less from my son? I can just imagine the calls from the police when he starts wiring things up to see how they work.

    4. Re:I know it is not fashionable to point this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehhh... I was the same way, and I went to public school. I'm a productive member of society ;) Just got married, bought a house, making decent money, bringing my own kid into the world later this year. There were definitely some boring parts of school, but I think the social interaction and learning of what it's like to deal with "the unwashed masses" was well worth my time in school.

      Kids in public school aren't demons. They're just kids. If you teach your son to understand that people are different, and everybody has things they aren't good at, including school, he should get along fine. If you have specific objections to the quality of public education, that's another issue. But don't deprive him of the opportunity to interact with "normal" people. His life will be filled with them, it's easier to get along with them if you learn how to when you're young.

      - Pitabred (posted AC since I've modded in this thread)

    5. Re:I know it is not fashionable to point this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA HA HA! You put a lot of stock into these IQ tests, don't you? Hint: this arbitrary number that you want to praise yourself for achieving isn't an achievement at all. We are all unimpressed with you Kreskin. And why bring up that car accident? Now you've got me dreaming about what might have been, if only...

    6. Re:I know it is not fashionable to point this out by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      HA HA HA! You put a lot of stock into these IQ tests, don't you?

      I put next to no stock in them. IQ tests mostly test the ability to take an IQ test. But they're the only thing we've got. Come up with something better and those who take stock in such things will use it.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  37. They said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it works for some cases of mild retardation, not major dain bramage. You're SOL.

  38. How can you tell if a mouse is retarded/autistic? by TheEmrys · · Score: 1

    Is it behavioral?

  39. sadly too late .. by shadowmas · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... for president bush to be of use i think.

    1. Re:sadly too late .. by rts008 · · Score: 1

      I think it's worth a try anyhow. All they need to do is make a football sized suppository....
      Hey, it's bound to do SOMETHING!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    2. Re:sadly too late .. by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

      We could still try it on Obama. One he realizes there aren't 57 states however, he might have to adjust his schedule to avoid campaigning in the imaginary ones. Not seeing the ghosts of fallen heroes in the audience anymore will come as a disappointment too.

    3. Re:sadly too late .. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      One he realizes there aren't 57 states however, he might have to adjust his schedule to avoid campaigning in the imaginary ones.

      Yeah, yeah, "57 states" and "fallen heroes -- and I see many of them in the audience here today" were funny slips of the tongue.

      But they no more means that he's as dumb as W than your typo of "One" for "Once" makes you a dunce. (This guarantees at least one typo in this post.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    4. Re:sadly too late .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you mean a post where a goatse reply would have been relevant!?!

    5. Re:sadly too late .. by Macrat · · Score: 1

      No reason not to test it. ;-)

  40. Poor Retarded Mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bad enough to be a mouse in today's cruel world, but then to be retarded as well, geez!

  41. Rats of NiHM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone tag this as NiHM?

  42. Solve all the world's problems: by general+scruff · · Score: 1

    Put it in the water.

    --
    As a rule, I never trust dark brown ketchup.
  43. Retarded Mice? by cerelib · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am curious. How do you tell a retarded mouse from a regular mouse? (No, they don't say NARF)

    1. Re:Retarded Mice? by Kidro · · Score: 1

      "Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?" (Pinky) Whoof, oh, I'd have to say the odds of that are terribly slim Brain. (Brain) True. (Pinky) I mean, really, when have I ever been pondering what you've been pondering? (Brain) To my knowledge, never. (Pinky) Exactly. So, what are the chances that this time, I'm pondering what you're pondering? (Brain) Next to nil. (Pinky) Well, that's exactly what I'm thinking, too. (Brain) Therefore, you *are* pondering what I'm pondering. (Pinky) Poit, I guess I am!

    2. Re:Retarded Mice? by oudzeeman · · Score: 1

      probably from behavioral studies. Once they find a mouse with a particular genetic defect they want to study they will breed that mouse with something like a "Black 6" mouse (the standard laboratory mouse). Then they take the offspring, find out which ones inherited the problem, and then start inbreeding them. After mating siblings with the genetic defect for 20 generations you end up with homozygous mice - all future mice in this new "inbred line" are now all genetically identical except for sex and spontaneous mutations. Now someone studying these drugs calls up The Jackson Laboratory and says I'm studying drugs to cure autism, what mouse model would you recommend? Or they might know what model they want from reading publications, so they just say I want mouse X5B6/J (I made that strain ID up, but thats what they look like), and they are guaranteed to get mice with the specific genetic defect they are studying. Or if they know they gene they want to turn off they can get a "knock out" mouse, which has been genetically modified to have a specific gene turned off.

    3. Re:Retarded Mice? by cerelib · · Score: 1

      Thank you for a great answer. If I hadn't already posted to this topic, I would mod you up.

    4. Re:Retarded Mice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the label on these is id10t.

    5. Re:Retarded Mice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They run a little slower in the wheel because they're beating their chest with one of their front paws. "Jerry's mice! Jerry's mice! thqueak! thqueak!"

  44. Giving away one's advantage... by Kenshin · · Score: 1

    Before you do, ask yourself... do you really want to give away your only advantage?

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  45. And as an adult who is Autistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "As a parent of an Autistic... who has a young man ... who is struggling not only to fit in, but to avoid punishment for perfectly natural behaviours." ... and "Any hope is a good hope "

    And as an adult who is Autistic, I've come to realize that we don't need to fit in. Some people will accept us the way we are and some people will not. I see no reason to have to change my behaviour to conform to the expectations of the ones who don't want to accept me the way I am. I see no reason to be insecure about who I am, simply as I fail to live up to the expectations of the ones who want me to behave a certain way.

    Being different isn't wrong, even though you may have heard differently.

    But what I find utterly fascinating is what you find when you ask the question, why do some people want others to fit into a certain behaviour?

    The key to understanding this question is to first learn to understand the extreme form of why some people want others to conform to a certain behaviour. Then it provides a way to see the more common, but less extreme desires of some people to get others to conform.

    The extreme form of this behaviour is the result of a personality disorder categorised as cluster B disorders. (Specifically HPD and NPD forms). Personality disorders are actually very common in society. (For example, its estimated that over 70% of people in prison have a cluster B disorder).

    In the case of HPD, they seek attention. (Its often due to lack of parental attention during childhood resulting in an on going fear and insecurity about the need for attention. (we are still pack animals, so when someone lacks the attention of their nearest family during childhood, they end up seeking the protection of the wider pack. Our society being that wider pack. So the safest place in any pack, is to be at the centre of attention in the pack. That's why they instinctively seek attention).

    When someone is relentlessly driven to seek more attention, they will often react defensively to anyone else gaining attention. They don't want others to get attention. So as autistics naturally behave differently and so naturally appear different (and so get attention by being different), this triggers a defensive reaction from the insecure attention seekers, who put down and mock anyone who gains attention over them. (Its why the whole concept of the nerd is mocked). The insecure attention seekers also achieve the goal of gaining more attention, by being the one doing the mocking put downs and insults. (Its a double win for them).

    The huge irony is that its the insecure attention seekers who have the problem. (In the case of the other forms of cluster B disorders, they often combine the HPD need for attention with other insecurities such as, fear of being seen as a coward, or fear of being seen as stupid, or fear of their unresolved sexual orientation, etc.. ... "fear" being the key word). The other forms of cluster B can be ruthlessly harmful towards others, yet they are the ones who are driven by their inner fears and insecurities. These people are not the kind of people who should be allowed to define what and how others should be seen and accepted within society. The sooner everyone learns to recognised the cluster B disorders (for their own protection from them), then the sooner the world will change, very much for the better. (Unfortunately as the cluster B disorders seek attention, they then naturally seek to define what's accepted in the media, as they seek to be in the media and so in the spotlight of attention, and so its how we have got into this unfortunate situation currently).

    As you are a parent of an Autistic, you need to learn to slightly change how you have been taught to perceive Autism. (Taught that is, by some people in society). Autistics have an intense desire to learn. They may focus on very narrow subjects and pursue it with a never ending intensity, that others cannot understand. But that doesn't actually make their intellige

    1. Re:And as an adult who is Autistic... by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1
      I think you meant to reply to the parent comment to mine (pesky 'Reply to this' buttons all over the screen), but in my case both I and Josh's mum can understand and cope with his behaviours (he's also physically and learning disabled, which adds to the mix), and take no heed of what other people think.

      There's a long continuum of autistic ability, and I'd seriously doubt from your prose that you are severely autistic - more mild Aspergers.

      Whatever - have a good life and be healthy.

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    2. Re:And as an adult who is Autistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an adult with an ASD. I want to fit in, I'm tired of the "Autistic Savant" archetype, and I'm of completely average intelligence despite appearing gifted because of my scholastic obsessions. And I hate the thought that the things you've said reflect on me.

    3. Re:And as an adult who is Autistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I want to fit in"

      No matter what you do, some people will not accept you. That was my point, its nothing you are doing that is wrong. Its how they treat others that is wrong and you cannot change that, no matter what you do. You have to learn that some people will accept you as a friend and equal and some people will never be fair to you and treat you badly. Be around the ones who treat you fairly and ignore the ones who are bad. They will go through life treating others badly, but its them with the problem.

      "I'm tired of the "Autistic Savant" archetype, and I'm of completely average intelligence despite appearing gifted because of my scholastic obsessions."

      I'm very aware of the Savant form of autisum, but its a misconception that people make (even the ones with good intentions) that they believe the savant form has normal or lower than normal intelegence. Savants can learn to remember huge amounts of information. In jobs requiring a lot of information to remember, they easily beat others. This ability also helps in exams giving a major advantage over others.

      The problem with IQ tests is that it tries to measure many mental abilities and then create one overall summary value. Too much information is lost in that one summary value. Its not a good representation of someone's abilities. Its simply a summary. Some people put too much emphasis on an IQ value. Ignore IQ values, it doesn't show what people can do. Societies need different skills in different areas of work and Savants can be exceptionally good in areas needing the ability to learn lots of information.

      You don't need to try to fit in, to be accepted and liked by people.

  46. Reverse Retardation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that "detardation"?

  47. Teachers may have to find a new career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seen a bumper sticker recently that said "I like my students with autism". My immediate thought was, well I like them with ketchup. I'm thinking this teacher will have to find a new career if all of her students get cured.

  48. Pinky? Are you pondering what I'm pondering? by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Yes, Brain I am. This time I actually am. And I'm two steps ahead of you. Please try and keep up, old bean.

    The End.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  49. Candidate Puppy has MY vote, dammit. by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

    Um, seriously. Between the plutocratic Republicans and the spineless Democrats who won't stand up to them, Candidate Puppy might get my vote from a reasoned perspective. He can't do further harm!

    (Sorry, I'm grumpy because Sen. Feinstein just sent a response to my letter about the FISA "retroactive immunity" bill ... explaining why she supports it. You see, it's important because it prevents future presidents from spying on Americans without a warrant. Why the spineless democrats absolutely refuse to take Bush to task for flaunting our laws just completely escapes me.)

    --
    I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
  50. Unfortunately, this is really hard to do by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

    The US public school system is badly broken.

    I sympathize with your plight. But I'd ask you to try to design a system that works for kids with IQ 65 and kids with IQ 131 ... and the majority of kids with IQ near 100, all on the extremely limited budget that we have. Personalized attention costs a ton of money: I recently heard that the special ed programs in the Los Angeles Unified School District, which serve 7% of the student population, already consume nearly 50% of the district's financial resources.

    Trying to expand any system to provide tailored education exactly fitted to every student's needs would require immensely greater resources than voters are willing to provide.

    I'm not saying there aren't things we could do - eliminating the testing-driven NCLB initiatives would be a good start - but I don't think this problem is completely fixable until Americans are willing to prioritize education quite a bit higher in the budget.

    --
    I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    1. Re:Unfortunately, this is really hard to do by Don853 · · Score: 1

      What would help would be stratifying the kids by ability level as soon as it becomes apparent, and giving up on the bullshit idea that everyone is equal and should be taught equally. The smart kids will by and large push each other, if they're provided with challenges and surrounded with people who are capable of competing with them. Some students who are way ahead of the curve disrupt the "average" students anyway because they're bored.

      The non-PC addition to this says you stop going to extreme expense to educate kids with Downs and other serious mental deficiencies who are never going to get very much value out of their education.

  51. Lawnmower Man by Tz-Auber · · Score: 1

    Insert Lawnmower Man reference here

  52. Re:flowers for algernon ... Gives a new ring to by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    "Of Mice and Men"...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  53. sad to see the funny posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such a sad illness, still a lot of people had funny things to say about it.
    I guess unless you personally see the pain and anguish in somebody, it is just a comical illness.

  54. Re:Finally a cure... It SEEMS obvious, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but consider carefully; "one of them's a genius", but WHICH is insane?

  55. Love your sig! by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    Just got done playing portal, have to say that I was unimpressed by the ending, but loved the "song."

    The cake is a lie.

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  56. An an Autistic parent of an Autistic by netsavior · · Score: 1

    I have to say that I know it is hard, but maybe he does not need fixing. Maybe he is how he needs to be. I was not very functional as a kid, but I have a very high IQ and a high paying job, a loving wife, 2 kids, etc. I was never cured, I just learned how to be myself and how to make that work. Acceptance is very difficult, but there are more paths than just a "cure".

    There are people who believe Neuro Diversity is acceptable and necessary

    1. Re:An an Autistic parent of an Autistic by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      I fully believe that my son is who he should be, but his tears literally cry to me for help. I'd be interested in this:

      If you could go back in time, as they say, what would you tell your four-year-old self about the situation? What would you tell your parents?

    2. Re:An an Autistic parent of an Autistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but his tears literally cry to me for help

      If his tears can actually cry, maybe you could sell them to science for research?

      Either that, or you meant a word like "metaphorically" or "figuratively."

    3. Re:An an Autistic parent of an Autistic by netsavior · · Score: 1

      Tell self:
      1)you cannot speak very well because you lack oral stimulation, and since your parents yell at you and punnish you for chewing on your shirt, I suggest you find something such as gum or candy to get the oral stimulation you need in order to properly organize your senses for speech.

      2)Other people really don't see things the way you do, you have to remember that pattern recognition, and problem solving are your strength and the solution is not obvious to everyone else, so you need to present it.

      3)You don't need to be self conscious, people think about you far less than you think about yourself, they probably don't even notice.

      4)The goal of school has nothing to do with education. Try to realize early on it is about making the teachers feel like they are useful and fulfilled, learning facts and procedures is secondary, it is not nearly as important to other people as they say it is, or as important to them as it is to you.

      5)Your strength is in being different, if everyone was a cheerleader, we would all starve. Your perspective is valuable simply because it is different. If you think the same way as everyone else you will make the same mistakes as everyone else... If you can learn from their mistakes and prevent some of your own, you will be ahead.

      To parents:
      1) Let me pick my own clothes - you would not believe how much higher functioning I became when I became able/allowed to pick the proper fit, style, texture, and color of clothing.

      2)no I do not need lots of friends to be happy (forced socialization was among the most painful parts of growing up)... having countless shrinks tell me I was depressed because I did not have enough friends was another, Just becase YOU would be depressed with less human contact doesn't mean I would be happier with more

    4. Re:An an Autistic parent of an Autistic by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Bless you, sir. And thank you.

    5. Re:An an Autistic parent of an Autistic by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to let you know that I was thinking about your words and decided to be more tolerant of my son's quirky behavior last night.

      See, we were shooting off fireworks and he was desperate to explore all the left-over trash that was being created. Normally this would be a 'Scotty, NO!' situation, and we started off with him straining against my arms and having a generally poor time.

      It dawned on me to call things to a halt and just give him a few minutes to 'scratch that itch', so to speak. It worked. After about ninety seconds of inspection, he was ready to take his seat and watch some more. We repeated this process about four times last night, and it was a great success.

      Thank you so much!

    6. Re:An an Autistic parent of an Autistic by netsavior · · Score: 1

      I am really glad to hear that.

  57. So we should buy Exxon stock? by tjstork · · Score: 1

    So, yeah, Bush is a hell of an oil man. He's done wonders for the industry

    See now, if we would privatized social security, our retirement accounts would be flush with loads of XOM.

    --
    This is my sig.
  58. So, this begs the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have they tried treating President Bush yet?

  59. I Agree by encoderer · · Score: 1

    I especially agree with this point:

    "The Public paid for and built those roads that the rich people use to make their money. The Public educated their employees. The Public consumes their products and media. The Public fights their wars for them."

    I use that same point against those that argue against a progressive income tax.

    The more successful you are, the more you are "standing on the shoulders of giants." The more successful you are, the more value you get from the whole of the American infrastructure. So it's only fair you pay more.

    And I think the real answer here is to not try to limit their income with, say, price controls or a windfall tax. Rather, I think they should be forced to TRULY pay for the economic impact their product produces.

    A cap-and-trade system in the spirit of a VAT tax: Oil companies are getting 80% of the revenue of oil, the rest goes to refiners and marketers. So 80% of the pollution derived from the oil they sell should fall under their cap.

    They'll have to spend billions to purchase credits, and that money will stimulate economic activity and provide an incentive to truly invest in new energy solutions.

    Again, I can't hate somebody for making a profit. We ALL want success. Bil Oil needs to learn the lesson the Clinton Administration and our States Attorneys General taught Big Tobacco. You can make billions in a dirty industry, but you have to pay your own way.

    What Big Oil is getting away with seems to me like, say, I created a Waste Management service and whenever I emptied the dumpsters at a clients location, I cashed their monthly payment then dumped all the garbage at the curb for the City to haul away.

    They're getting a free ride. It's BS.

    (Excuse my long post. I get worked up!)

    1. Re:I Agree by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the reply. Your solution seems promising. I'm also pleasantly surprised that while your initial quotes made you look like some conservative who thinks the right to profit trumps all other responsibilities, you actually seem to be quite rational. Kudos.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    2. Re:I Agree by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      You can only stand on the shoulders of giants if you make it worthwhile for the giant to bother to stand up in the first place.

  60. An investigation into one specific disorder... by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine TSC sufferers are a big market. Then again, narcoleptics aren't a big market either, but Modafinil ("Provigil®") seems to be doing pretty well in the market. The side-effects of rapamycin seem pretty serious, but it's possible a related compound could be developed that better targets the desired brain improvements and has lesser side-effects. So the question is: what kind of effect might a drug in this class have on normal "healthy" individuals? Could it be used as a performance-enhancing drug, much as modafinil and adderall sometimes are? That would expand its market greatly and bring down the cost for TSC sufferers...

  61. Of Mice and Men by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

    Why does this comparison between mice and people keep coming up? A mouse is a very different species, and so, does animal testing on mice have ANY medical och scientific significance at all? I doubt it.

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  62. Finally... by azav · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally, a way to rid the world of retarded mice.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  63. Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it came out 8 years too late.

  64. What a headline by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    Autism = retardation? Nice.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  65. all the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is interesting how far people will go to make them more like themselves instead of learning to adapt to the differences of others. One of the values of people with Learning Disabilities are their ability to learn one subject to a higher level of understand then other people in their time; sometimes to a great revolutionary idea, other times not so much. Either way, seeing things from another view points normally helps people to think outside of the box where as this does not happen if people view things the same way. So, I am not sure if this is good or bad yet.

  66. Help solve America's problems... by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    ...by making Californians less retarded. Put this in their drinking water.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  67. but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    still no cure for ugly