Slashdot Mirror


Rat-Brained Robots Take Their First Steps

missb writes "Brain tissue cultured from rats has controlled a wheeled robot around a lab, according to New Scientist this week. Researchers in the UK have harnessed signals from thousands of disembodied rat neurons, and manipulated them to get a robot to respond to instructions. The team at the University of Reading in the UK hope their research will help provide treatments for diseases like Alzheimer's and epilepsy."

289 comments

  1. Rat-Brained overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I for one welcome our new Rat-Brained Robot overlords!

    1. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by colmore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does anyone else out there take science fiction just a *little* bit seriously and think that some of the robotics innovations over the past 10 or 15 years might be a little bit dangerous?

      AI is actually a little bit impressive, there just isn't a market for it yet.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    2. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as I read the summary, I just knew some bar steward would get straight onto this story and post an 'I welcome our blah blah overlords' post.

      I fear that I have been on Slashdot for too long.

    3. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by thedonger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right. We try to develop something in a few years that took a hundred million years to evolve and expect that if we manage to duplicate it somehow it will be totally benign?

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    4. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by thedonger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And don't forget Asimov and other sci-fi writers were thinking of these implications half a century ago and more. Is this life imitating art?

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    5. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by colmore · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just because White Man's Science has yet to be stricken down by the angered Old Gods doesn't mean it won't.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    6. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Now.Imperfect · · Score: 1

      I welcome you, my post predicting overlord!

    7. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by jacquesm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I for one am sick and tired of researchers hijacking Alzheimers and other diseases to legitimize their work.

      Even if your work is not even remotely related just mentioning that one day maybe you will possibly contribute a tiny little bit then everybody will give you all the news coverage you could possibly want.

    8. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by VanGarrett · · Score: 1

      Despite the best warnings of our historical authors, mankind will, inescapably create intelligent robots. It comes from our sheer desire to create; perhaps it is part of our nature to aspire to be like our own creator? Regardless, just as we cast off our own faith in our gods, cursing them and labeling them as myths, our own creations, built in our own image, will inevitably do the same. The only question is this: will our robots succeed in destroying us, or will we succeed in destroying them?

    9. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new Rat-Brained Robot overlords!

      who said they were new "ba-dum TSH"

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    10. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, the "old gods". Better watch out for something that has no evidence of existing. At all. I hope whoever modded you informative was making a joke.

    11. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by d474 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Give me your boots, cheese, and your motorcycle.

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    12. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by cavis · · Score: 1

      Wisconsin - you'd better get your Legislature to invest in D-Con pretty quickly.

    13. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Cordwainer Smith had laminated rat's brains being used as sentient computers, in stories written in the early 70's.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cordwainer_Smith

    14. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Evildonald · · Score: 1

      As soon as I read this headline I wanted to be the first to write that!

    15. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      Even if your work is not even remotely related just mentioning that one day maybe you will possibly contribute a tiny little bit then everybody will give you all the news coverage you could possibly want.

      Because making rat brain controlled robots isn't newsworthy?

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    16. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Moryath · · Score: 1

      I for one am not half as worried about a robot or animal-brained simulacrum running rampant as I am about a normal, deranged human with access to some form of weaponry or construction equipment.

      Of course, then I consider that the difference between the brain of a vicious dog, and a guy like this, probably isn't as large as we would have hoped.

      Screw it. Put the brain of a woman with skills in many varieties of sex, into a hardy yet soft and pliant simulacrum body. I'd at least die happy.

    17. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      maybe, but it really is not at all related to Alzheimers, and that's what gets them the coverage.

      That's just a cynical usage of other peoples suffering to get funding and publicity.

    18. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Alzheimers · · Score: 4, Funny

      Agreed. Please stop hijacking me!

    19. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by xaositects · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't forget:

      Phn'glui M'gl wna'f, Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgha Nagl Ftaghn

    20. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      And a ping-pong ball to cut in half to make a crash helmet.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    21. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put the brain of a woman with skills in many varieties of sex, into a hardy yet soft and pliant simulacrum body. Just what the world needs- Realdolls with headaches.

    22. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by FilterMapReduce · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new Rat-Brained Robot overlords!

      As do I. With our mighty ape brains, they should be pretty easy to overthrow, right?

    23. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      I'm taking a stab in the dark here, but perhaps GP meant in the broader sense: Fucking with things you don't really understand may have consequences you are equally ill-equipped to grasp?

    24. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I'm going to hijack you all the way to Cuba!

      Viva la Revolucion!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    25. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, but you have heard of them... [/Captain Jack Sparrow]

    26. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Metasquares · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, my first thought was "this is not even remotely related to Alzheimer's, and even relating it to epilepsy is a stretch." It's not about publicity, though; it's about funding.

    27. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by brunokummel · · Score: 1

      Right. We try to develop something in a few years that took a hundred million years to evolve and expect that if we manage to duplicate it somehow it will be totally benign?

      Hundred Million years? What if the Intelligent Design theory is right? =)

      --
      What is best in life? To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women.
    28. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Cthulhu fhtagn!

    29. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Brad1138 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know this is a little off topic but, I Googled "Phn'glui M'gl wna'f, Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgha Nagl Ftaghn" the second listing was from the parent post above! Indexed by Google about 90 min. after it was posted. Forget welcoming our Rat brained overlords, better watch out for our all knowing Google Overlords.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    30. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by verbamour · · Score: 1

      Ok, now _you_ try running an underwater maze, monkey-boy...

    31. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by pluther · · Score: 1

      Hundred Million years? What if the Intelligent Design theory is right? =)

      If it isn't now, it will be.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    32. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by ya+really · · Score: 1

      Just because White Man's Science has yet to be stricken down by the angered Old Gods doesn't mean it won't.

      Oh, give me a break and stop trolling. Science doesn't have a color attached to it. The facts are the facts and that's what makes science so great. Unlike history and the soft sciencies out there, you can't BS your way out of the hard sciences. I suppose we should ditch all the theories and laws by men such as Newton, Dalton, Ohm, Faraday, and Telsa, because they were white or maybe rewrite science history so it's more diversified?

    33. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Phn'glui M'gl wna'f, Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgha Nagl Ftaghn"

      That's easy for YOU to say!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    34. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      You don't understand. We will never try to duplicate the emotion machine. All serious studies being done now are

      a) at a primitive level, trying to understand basic underpinnings like memory.

      b) targeted at creating sentience, not emotion. In general, sentience without egoistical or similar motives tends to be completely neutral in relation to other beings, and what will most likely happen is that we give the machines incentives other than the human-evolved ones to keep it going, and thinking. This is an immense task.

      c) restricted by neuro-science, not our own design ability. The reason why undesirable parts of the rat brain are being included in the study is because, as mentioned above, psychology is rather primitive at the moment, and people for the last 100 years or so have tried to learn more about "what part does what" by chopping bits off, attaching things on..etc. Just read some of the academic literature. It's hilarious. True understanding at a molecular level is what is needed, and when it comes it will be unlikely that anything will "go wrong" with the final products, any worse than what goes wrong with human beings in these "civilized" times. You know, that race that rapes, kills, ravages, tortures and tries to completely obliterate its own kind, boh mentally and physically, for reasons completely outside the realm of logic or even survival?

      Science is never harmful. Human intentions are the problem, and they've been here for a while.

    35. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by adrian727 · · Score: 1

      And later, thug-brained robot overlords

    36. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      Here Here. I believe it to be inevitable that we will we engineer our evolutionary successors.

      (And no I am not one of those sky-is-falling singularity-is-near people.)

    37. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      Self-replying here... ... and if the todays article on Jupiter's slow-but-steady bulldozing of the planetary habitable zone is correct, we need to hurry up.

    38. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by dafragsta · · Score: 1

      Sealab 2021 did it.

    39. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by colmore · · Score: 0

      I was kidding folks.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    40. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by colmore · · Score: 1

      Didn't you just describe a regular real woman? She's out there buddy, keep looking.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    41. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by colmore · · Score: 1

      I see you didn't read that article...

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    42. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by LittleBigScript · · Score: 1

      Call him Nicodemus.

    43. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Have epilepsy or Alzheimer's disease?

      Have no fear - we can replace your brain with a rat brain that takes care of that minor issue!

    44. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason for the high placement in the search results is that the post is misspelled...
      It should be:
      Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

      P.S.
      Yes, I'm a total geek for recognizing that it was misspelled. But then again, I read Slashdot, so that's to be expected. :-)
      D.S.

    45. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      Philosophical Question - is it Artificial Intelligence if the brain in question is real ?

      N.

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    46. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit. So much for women.

    47. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by xaositects · · Score: 1

      the misspelling was to weed out the non-believers, to throw them off track. One of those tricks used in the grimoires of old. besides Cthulhu speaks with huge bloops anyway
      IA!

    48. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
      I for one can't really tell the difference between our new Rat-Brained Robot Overlords and the ones we're stuck with now...

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    49. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      In general, sentience without egoistical or similar motives tends to be completely neutral in relation to other beings, and what will most likely happen is that we give the machines incentives other than the human-evolved ones to keep it going, and thinking. This is an immense task.

      There's a nice scifi books where this very concept of biological machines built from neurons but without the "emotion engine" play a central role at the ending: Starfish, by Peter Watts (BY-NC-SA 2.5 licensed).

      In the novel these machines aren't programmed, they're taught to follow certain patterns, what in turn requires a behavior reinforcement mechanism to exist. The questions is: what happens if you take such a completely amoral biocomputer, highly optimized at processing certain kinds of data (in the case, cleaning viruses from live Internet traffic), and replace the IO system allowing it to deal with things such as ecosystems?

      Let's say the result is pretty troublesome.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    50. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by joleonard1 · · Score: 1

      Robocop, anyone?

    51. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by HerbanLegend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tell that to Percy Julian, or the Australian scientist whose discovery of early human specimens was brushed aside in favor of Piltdown Man essentially because nobody in Britain could stomach a human origin that was non-European. Now, those mistakes have been corrected, but it sometimes takes a lifetime or two, and that is significant.

    52. Re:Rat-Brained overlords by H3g3m0n · · Score: 1

      I know this is a little off topic but, I Googled "Phn'glui M'gl wna'f, Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgha Nagl Ftaghn" the second listing was from the parent post above! Indexed by Google about 90 min. after it was posted. Forget welcoming our Rat brained overlords, better watch out for our all knowing Google Overlords.

      Perhaps the Google spiderbot just likes to read Slashdot. Although that could also be a cause for concern...

      --
      cat /dev/urandom > .sig
  2. Names please. by snspdaarf · · Score: 5, Funny

    What was the lead researcher's name? Davros?

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    1. Re:Names please. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The big question is can it climb stairs. I mean how can you conquer the Universe if you can't even climb stairs.
      I have to say that this really creeps me out.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Names please. by SlipperHat · · Score: 1

      Invent jetpacks.

    3. Re:Names please. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Desty Nova

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    4. Re:Names please. by SirLurksAlot · · Score: 4, Funny

      This gives a whole new meaning to "EXTERMINATE, EXTERMINATE!"

      --
      God, schmod. I want my monkey man!
    5. Re:Names please. by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more of Saberhagen's Berserkers (specifically, Berserker Base) except in that case it was human brains being experimented upon by robotic intelligences, so the Dalek comparison is probably a better one.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    6. Re:Names please. by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Daleks. That is all.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    7. Re:Names please. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Funny

      The big question is can it climb stairs. I mean how can you conquer the Universe if you can't even climb stairs.

      You level the building.

    8. Re:Names please. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      You have the government mandate wheelchair access ramps and/or elevators everywhere.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    9. Re:Names please. by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      The big question is can it climb stairs. I mean how can you conquer the Universe if you can't even climb stairs.
      I have to say that this really creeps me out.

      It takes the elevator or brings the top floor to ground level.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    10. Re:Names please. by hypomorph · · Score: 1

      Yes... I'll call it the ratotron dynamics technique!! the most powerful flan eating creation known to man! Eaaaghaha! --Nova

      --
      Hell, there are no rules here-- we're trying to accomplish something. --Thomas A. Edison
    11. Re:Names please. by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't be American by any chance would you? :) j/k

      --
      Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    12. Re:Names please. by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Personally I was expecting their creator's name to be something like "John Lumic", but hey.

    13. Re:Names please. by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      /me taps foot and holds out hand.
      You. Geek-card. Now.
      Your credentials are hereby revoked.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    14. Re:Names please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't the Peking Homunculus have a rat brain in it? And it almost caused World War 6!

      Where is the Doctor when we need him?

    15. Re:Names please. by ThJ · · Score: 1

      Whooosh...

  3. Obligatory.. by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I, for one, welcome our rat brained robotic overlords.

    1. Re:Obligatory.. by pha7boy · · Score: 1

      and welcome ye shall. Because, nothing, absolutely NOTHING, can go wrong when you put rat brains into metallic bodies. No, nothing can go wrong. I also hope they add those gold plated nano-wires that convert heat to electricity, so they can be autonomous for years on end. *walks away whistling as the world burns behind him*

      --
      -- All this knowledge is giving me a raging brainer.
    2. Re:Obligatory.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...rat brained robotic overlords.

      They prefer to be called 'lawyers'.

    3. Re:Obligatory.. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What exactly would robots with rat brains want to do, since they can't do any of their natural biological functions?

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    4. Re:Obligatory.. by TheNucleon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Conquer the world, of course. This was the first conclusion I came to.

      --
      My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of my employer, my spouse, my children, or my cats.
    5. Re:Obligatory.. by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on, you paranoid person! It's not like they put rats in control of tanks and filled the world with cheese. They are experimenting with a proof of concept. They aren't going to take this to the cartoonish conclusion that you guys are jumping to. LOL

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    6. Re:Obligatory.. by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Kill all humans.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    7. Re:Obligatory.. by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The same thing we do every night, Pinky - try to take over the world.

    8. Re:Obligatory.. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 2, Funny

      NARF!

    9. Re:Obligatory.. by amnezick · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of the same question. The way the brain evolves to understand what survival means now that food is not an issue but energy ... electric energy that is ... will be an interesting process to watch.

      --
      mov ax,4c00h
      int 21h
    10. Re:Obligatory.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robocop Rat Edition!

  4. What does it do when you show it cheese ? by slashdotlurker · · Score: 3, Funny

    Curious minds want to know.

    1. Re:What does it do when you show it cheese ? by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 2, Funny

      Noting much, but if you show it a binary representation of some cheese, that gets it's attention.

    2. Re:What does it do when you show it cheese ? by phillips321 · · Score: 1

      01000011:01001000:01000101:01000101:01010011:01000101 01001001:01100110:00100000:01111001:01101111:01110101:00100000:01100011:01100001:01101110:00100000:01110010:01100101:01100001:01100100:00100000:01110100:01101000:01101001:01110011:00100000:01110100:01101000:01100101:01101110:00100000:01111001:01101111:01110101:00100000:01101011:01101110:01101111:01110111:00100000:01100010:01101001:01101110:01100001:01110010:01111001:00100001

  5. What in the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Am I the only one who fails to see how these rodent zombie robots have anything to do with Alzheimer's?

    1. Re:What in the... by juiceboxfan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Am I the only one who fails to see how these rodent zombie robots have anything to do with Alzheimer's?

      Obviously, you get more funding if you include a hot research topic in the project description.

    2. Re:What in the... by Normal+Dan · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Researchers were all like, "Hey, let's build a robot with a rat brain, that will be fun!" But then one of them said, "But how will we fund this pointless yet awesome endeavor?". To that the reply was, "umm... let's just tell everyone it'll help cure Alzheimer's or epilepsy or autism or something, they'll have to fund it then."

      --
      A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
    3. Re:What in the... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Am I the only one who fails to see how these rodent zombie robots have anything to do with Alzheimer's?

      Perhaps you could try RTFAing, then applying some logical thought.

      They're studying how disassociated nerons make new connections and can be trained to reliably respond to stimuli, and how that response can be used to create predictable behavior.

      Now go ahead STFW for the pathophysiology of Alzheimers, and it's pretty easy to see how this could be useful in understanding Alzheimers, and perhaps in (eventually, with a lot of steps inbetween) help either prevent it, delay its onset, or reverse it.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:What in the... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Am I the only one who fails to see how these rodent zombie robots have anything to do with Alzheimer's?

      Well I assume it's because having a zombie rat robot come at you is something not even an Alzheimer's sufferer would forget.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:What in the... by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      It's about learning how to reroute data through the parts of the brain that are damaged. Or perhaps to replace those parts.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    6. Re:What in the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Anonymous Coward here. No reason to be rude. I read the article. What I don't understand is why they need to be connected to robots. It just seems like Alzheimer's is a secondary goal here, since I'm sure they could do experiments about training neurons to respond to stimuli that are less costly.

      I'm even fine with them hooking the robot up to an ultrasound. What I don't understand is the need for them to build a bluetooth robot to process the results. It seems silly.

    7. Re:What in the... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, the robot in this case performs two functions: one is to provide the stimuli, one is to measure the response. It's a machine capable of locomotion.

      The reason for the bluetooth is because the braincell broth needs to be maintained at a certain temperature and kept stable, and wireless is probably the best way to make sure the robot doesn't damage the brain cells or upset their alignment, say by jerking on an electrode tether.

      I see your point, it does seem awfully gimmicky... but the nice thing about it is that it is modular. Their "sensory" system can be swapped out easily for additonal experiments.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    8. Re:What in the... by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      it does seem awfully gimmicky.

      yeah.. "Rise of the rat-brained robots" sounds way cooler than "1 volt signal causes 100-microvolt reaction in rat brain neurons"
      They could have measured the same results just with input and output wires.. no need to hook them up to sensors and motors.. they just did it for attention.

    9. Re:What in the... by Killer+Instinct · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could try RingTFA, then applying some logical thought.
      There, fixed that for you. Carry On.

      --
      #include bier;
    10. Re:What in the... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      To be completely pedantic, that should have been "perhaps you could try to RTFA", since it preserves the conjugation of "to read" in RTFA.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    11. Re:What in the... by xenn · · Score: 1

      yeah, thanks for clearing that up, because the meaning of what you were trying to say was completely obfuscated by not adding those extra two or three letters.

      I'm just glad someone around here could make such huge leap in comprehension for us all.

    12. Re:What in the... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I just figured that if someone was getting all pedantic on me, I'd up the ante and out-pedant them. It would be useful if every grammar pedant out there remembered that there's always a bigger pedant waiting around the corner... and that just because I choose not to bother with perfect grammar doesn't mean that I'm not capable of it.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    13. Re:What in the... by Killer+Instinct · · Score: 1

      I just figured that if someone was getting all NAZI on me, I'd up the ante and out-NAZI them. It would be useful if every grammar NAZI out there remembered that there's always a bigger NAZI waiting around the corner... and that just because I choose not to bother with perfect grammar doesn't mean that I'm not capable of it.

      There, I fixed that one for ya too. Carry on.

      --
      #include bier;
    14. Re:What in the... by MikeUW · · Score: 1

      RTFA *AND* SFTW? For pathophysiology of Alzheimers no less?

      I think that's just asking way too much of the average /.er here.

    15. Re:What in the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Side effects may include, but are not limited to:

      Reduced maze comprehension.
      Frequent cheese urges.
      Tail growth. ...

    16. Re:What in the... by acheron12 · · Score: 1

      I wonder how the brain feels when it's "swapped out"?

      "Ooh, sensory perception, I'm awake!"
      trundle trundle
      "Ooh, no sensory perception. Guess I suddenly fell asleep. Except I don't have sleep hormones so I'll just hallucinate?"

      --
      there is no god but truth, and reality is its prophet
    17. Re:What in the... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      "RTFA" is still a legitimate acronym. "Reading" starts with an R.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    18. Re:What in the... by famebait · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who fails to read the article?

      No.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
  6. Remember Saturn 3? by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Remember Saturn 3? by MBCook · · Score: 1

      Really? I was thinking of how scientists recently created a sheep with the brain of a goat.

      The story was reported by The Onion, this is just the link I came across for it.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  7. Shit. by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

    So we need to expect a cyborg rat invasion now?

    I, for the rest, do not welcome our rat brained robotic overlords.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Shit. by colmore · · Score: 1

      Anyone else read "We 3"

      One of the best comics in the past few years.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    2. Re:Shit. by bishiraver · · Score: 1

      Let's just hope they don't have bluetooth connections to each other - after a couple hundred of them huddle together, they can cast fifth level spells!!!

    3. Re:Shit. by camperslo · · Score: 1

      So we need to expect a cyborg rat invasion now?

      Or perhaps some other kind branching from earlier experiments?

    4. Re:Shit. by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Don't give my DM any ideas... Please!

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  8. That outcome is very much exaggerated. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The team at the University of Reading in the UK hope their research will help provide treatments for diseases like Alzheimer's and epilepsy."

    That outcome is very much exaggerated, apparently to try to get more attention. Any such result would depend on other huge advancements not yet made.

    1. Re:That outcome is very much exaggerated. by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be fair, you kind of have to play the game to get funding at times. At least "It'll save the lives of our troops!" wasn't on there.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    2. Re:That outcome is very much exaggerated. by Ngarrang · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That outcome is very much exaggerated, apparently to try to get more attention. Any such result would depend on other huge advancements not yet made.

      You must be new to the business of grants and how to get them.

      --
      Bearded Dragon
    3. Re:That outcome is very much exaggerated. by samkass · · Score: 1

      I gather that their cure for Alzheimer's and epilepsy is apparently to remove the brain and place it in a robotic body?

      --
      E pluribus unum
    4. Re:That outcome is very much exaggerated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they submit a research paper without suggesting an eventual goal for their research, then you would be complaining that they were wasting time and money pointlessly.

    5. Re:That outcome is very much exaggerated. by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      Actually, to me it sounded like a case of optimism about the wrong thing. The more important result of such research would be in understanding how exactly the brain works, which would be useful in reverse-engineering it and learning how it implements those functions that are notoriously difficult to program: social interaction, human language (if a human brain), creativity, etc., all while burdened with tons of biases. That would, in turn, help in making realistic androids.

      However, if EmbeddedJanitor is right, all they've done is find some ultra-simple input-output relationship that exists among some rat brain tissue, and use that in place of a regular electronics-kit component where they need that I/O relationship. In that case it's not very helpful; we're interested in being able to break down the more complicated chains of events that happen in a brain.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    6. Re:That outcome is very much exaggerated. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Sweet, I for one welcome our forgetfully twitching robotic overlords.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    7. Re:That outcome is very much exaggerated. by jrob323 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Yep, Uncle John was in terrible shape, what with his Alzheimer's and epilepsy and what not. But those doctors smeared some of his brain cells on that robot, and now he's just rolling around like crazy!"

    8. Re:That outcome is very much exaggerated. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      They hope their research will help provide treatments for diseases like Alzheimer's and epilepsy.

      So what exactly is exaggerated? Do you doubt that the researchers hope their research will someday be helpful?

      They didn't claim their research will cure anything. The web has a lot of exaggerated claims, but I think you've become overly sensitive.

    9. Re:That outcome is very much exaggerated. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Not picking on you personally but what's up with all the high-karma bitching about scientists generating attention for their work.

      Why is it wrong for scientists to attract attention? Should scientists hide in the basement and wait to be discovered? Do scientist not deserve to get payed? Should we not bother about public funding and just wait for another Edison (or Gates)? Are the people who supply the funding simply idiots with a cheque book?

      I really want to know why slashdot thinks the funding meme is insightful, what is the fucking problem with scientists promoting their successfull work to potential supporters?

      Now to get back to you personally, you state: "That outcome is very much exaggerated" - There is no fucking outcome, read the quote you posted it says HOPE and HELP!

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    10. Re:That outcome is very much exaggerated. by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the researchers are not proud of this overstatement, but guess this is what one gotta do nowdays to obtain grant money.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  9. Tom, by slashdotlurker · · Score: 1

    meet Jerry.

  10. this is old news by iXiXi · · Score: 5, Funny

    We have had these running around here for years. We just called them MBA's.

    1. Re:this is old news by Dekortage · · Score: 2, Funny

      They tried a mass of politician neurons first, but the robot kept speeding directly for the wall.

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    2. Re:this is old news by ruin20 · · Score: 1

      That's "Mouse Brained Android" as "Masters of Business Administration" clearly don't react logically to external stimuli.

      --
      Oh honey look... How cute... an angry slashdotter!
    3. Re:this is old news by UncleTogie · · Score: 2, Funny

      They tried a mass of politician neurons first, but the robot kept speeding directly for the wall.

      ...and tried to shag the wall once it reached it...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  11. next step: politics by syrinx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Surely a rat brain would be an improvement over the standard politician's brain.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:next step: politics by LuxMaker · · Score: 1

      Surely a rat brain would be an improvement over the standard politician's brain.

      Yes, with a Beowulf cluster of these, I am sure it would be hard to beat.

      --
      I regret that I only have one mod point to give per post.
    2. Re:next step: politics by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Hmm, Image a Beowulf cluster of Politician's brains....On second thought....don't.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:next step: politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely a rat brain would be an improvement over the standard politician's brain.

      Improvement? It's the same thing, only difference is that rats don't dress themselves up in suits.

    4. Re:next step: politics by tenton · · Score: 1

      We call that "Congress"

    5. Re:next step: politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about a "Pig Brained Peking Homunculus"?

    6. Re:next step: politics by Genda · · Score: 1

      Do you have the faintest idea how many politicians you'd have to go through to get the equivalent of a rat's brain?...

      We'd have anarchy!

    7. Re:next step: politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, Image a Beowulf cluster of Politician's brains....On second thought....don't.

      Yeah, doesn't Congress have something like a 9% approval rating?

  12. Re:Oh No! by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

    PITA is going to have a field day with this one.

    It's PETA. Not Pain In The Ass (although some do feel that way about them); People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

    As to whether or not said field day will occur, I will abstain from commenting as I have not RTFA. But it would not surprise me if they do.

    --
    Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
  13. Are the rats by any chance named.... by 8127972 · · Score: 1

    .... Morbius?

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  14. LOVE the misspelling by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 0

    PITA is going to have a field day with this one.

    LOVE the misspelling of PETA. How true, how true...

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:LOVE the misspelling by oldspewey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually GP is correct ... he is referring to People for the Insensitive Treatment of Animals.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:LOVE the misspelling by CogDissident · · Score: 1

      Insensitive? The rat has no brain, hard for it to sense much of anything. *badum-chi*

    3. Re:LOVE the misspelling by camperdave · · Score: 1

      The rat has no brain, hard for it to sense much of anything.

      Actually, in a related article, they have managed to get the rat body to run off of a Basic Stamp.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  15. Re:Oh No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? I didn't realize that flat bread was so cognizant. Just spread some couscous on it, it should appease them.

  16. Er.. by AlterRNow · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Something is amiss with this. I can understand the robot reacting to the "signals" from the neurons but.. how do the neurons know where the walls are? I would imagine that 3,000 neurons isn't enough to parse any input it is being provided ( ultra-sound by the looks of it ) let alone figure out which direction to move in to avoid them.

    --
    The disappearing pencil trick. Let me show you it.
    1. Re:Er.. by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Where are you getting 3,000 from? I scanned the article and saw 300,000

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Er.. by eric.rakestraw · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      They then record the spikes of voltage produced at points within the culture when signals from the sensor are sent to it. When they find an area that fires consistently when the sensor input reaches it, those signals can be picked up by an electrode and used to, say, make the robot avoid an obstruction.

      It seems as though the neurons don't really parse the input at all. They simply 'fire' whenever they are fed a certain signal from the ultrasound input.

      For example, if the ultrasound sensor indicates "wall dead ahead" with a 1 volt signal, and a certain knot of neurons in the culture always generates a 100-microvolt action potential when that happens, the latter signal can be used to make the robot steer right or left to avoid the wall.

      So the robot then interprets the neurons' firing as an indication that it is close to a wall, and changes direction accordingly.

      In all, it appears that only a tiny bit of "processing" is actually being done by the neurons, and it may be misleading to imply that they are really "controlling" the direction of the robot. All they do is fire in response to a voltage generated by the ultrasound input; it is the robot which interprets this firing as "a wall is close, time to change direction."

      Still quite an impressive breakthrough, though.

    3. Re:Er.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are you getting 3,000 from? I scanned the article and saw 300,000

      Anyway 300,000 is not enough for what AlterRNow thought. But he's in a missunderstanding of what the article says.
      The little -very very little have to say- brain they use to handle the robot movements isn't being aware of where the walls are.
      If you read the linked article, the thing works this way:

      [1] Robot has a ultrasonic sensor which manage to find where walls are, how close, etc.
      [2] That sensor sends a signal to the brain, which reacts to the voltage applied.
      [3] The brain sends back a very litle voltage which makes the robot to avoid the wall.

      So no intelligence nor processing actually happen on that little brain. It just reacts in front of a voltage and sends a simple signal back.

    4. Re:Er.. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Well, from a very brief look at TFA, it looks like they're growing something that resembles a mini-bio-microchip then attempting to basically reverse-engineer it by applying voltage here and seeing what the voltage is elsewhere. Then when they see a pattern, I recall the article said they apply 1v somewhere and they get 100mv somewhere else, they can attach probes and connect it to physical sensors and controls and they got about 80% success... i.e. about 80% of the time the 1v impulse generated the desired 100mv signal that turned the robot.

      Really interesting stuff, I have to say, but it's a long way from understanding how the brain works. It might be the right road, though... maybe we'll get there eventually.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    5. Re:Er.. by GrievousMistake · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Article says 300,000, a bit more than the average fruit fly
      You can do a lot with quite few neurons, too. You don't really need to 'parse' the input, just simple fuzzy logic, something like "if we're close to a wall in one direction, swing to the other." Using even 3,000 neurons to do what you could do by hardwiring a couple of resistors from the prox. sensors to the wheel engines would be a criminal waste.
      Ever played Bug Brain, BTW? Wicked fun!

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
    6. Re:Er.. by apathy+maybe · · Score: 1

      So good (I assume) sir, how do you make decisions to avoid walls? Could it be... electro-chemical signals go from your eyes to other parts of the brain, which then send signals to your muscles to avoid the wall? No actual intelligence going on at all is there...

      --
      I wank in the shower.
    7. Re:Er.. by kobotronic · · Score: 1

      Impressive breakthrough? If the article reporting is accurate, they have achieved very little. They may have over-simplified the setup in the article, but from what they write, it seems the silly little robot and its ultrasound proximity detector could be easily substituted with a pushbutton and a LED indicating that the neuron fires when stimulated by the ignal from the pushbutton. Big whoop de do. I simply don't see how this is significant.

      Give the neural mesh something to process other than just a meaningless blip. Provide some context. Connect all the (8?) ultrasound sensors individually to different points in the mesh, and let the mesh control the robot motors directly, with some form of feedback that corresponds to the motion and an impact sensor that responds to actually hitting the wall by temporarily shutting down the motor system and triggering still other neurons to indicate an error state. Run in that configuration for a while and see what happens. Divorced from a proper brain context I don't know if it would be possible for the mesh to achieve any sort of motivation or goal seeking behavior, though.

    8. Re:Er.. by AlterRNow · · Score: 1

      I had skimmed over the article. Next time though, I'll read it. Maybe I need more neurons? heh.

      Thanks parent and GP for the correction!

      --
      The disappearing pencil trick. Let me show you it.
    9. Re:Er.. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... figure out a way to trigger "pain" and when it bumps into the wall, fire that. See if it "learns" to avoid it then. That would be getting somewhere. I agree with you, they're basically using this as a weird sort of an op-amp... trigger it with 1v on one probe and it fires 100mv on a probe somewhere else.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  17. Aaargh by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Funny

    Suddenly, I just can't stop screaming.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  18. What was that sound? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It was the whoosh of grant money going down the drain.

    This work will hopefully contribute to our knowledge of how brains work, but its potential should not be exaggerated, says Potter. "This system is a model. Everything it does is merely similar to what goes on in a brain, it's not really the same thing. We can learn about the brain - but it may mislead us."

    What? Is he serious, making a statement like that? Does he think grants grow on trees, that he can so blithely disregard the opportunity for sensationalistic coverage and the resultant exposure to those who issue private grants? Sure, Alzheimer's is mentioned, which is a nice hook, but he needs to make ridiculous claims in order to break through the wall of grant-deniers.

    Sheesh. What is the academic world coming to, that they make responsible statements regarding their research?

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:What was that sound? by kungfugleek · · Score: 2, Funny

      It gets worse. Early on in the experiment Potter was quoted as saying, "Ok, I'll do it. But first I'm gonna get tore up!"

    2. Re:What was that sound? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they could make up some crap about the world cooling....no....warming up. they could get an former US Vice Pres to be the spokes person to lend it some credibility. (They may have to pay him 160 Million or so, but it'll be worth it) Then attach it to all research that they do. This will combat world warming, or Global Warming, or better yet that's to specific, lets call it Global Climate Change. I'm sure that'll get us funding for our research.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  19. Misleading headline... by polyomninym · · Score: 1

    I totally thought this was about some greenhorn politicians ;) Ok, I think I feel my karma dropping already.

    1. Re:Misleading headline... by kungfugleek · · Score: 1
      It is.

      "Nixon's back, baby!! Brrrrrrr!!!" (Futurama quote)

  20. Yeah, but... by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 1

    Unlike rats, you can't eat a robot.




    What?!

    1. Re:Yeah, but... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Unlike rats, you can't eat a robot.

      Maybe you can't.

    2. Re:Yeah, but... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Carne de rata.

    3. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can with these. They're crunchy outside, but with a creamy filling.

    4. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if rats could eat a robot, but I bet they could eat the wiring and cause a short.

    5. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rats can't eat robots either.

  21. Jack the sound barrier. Bring the noise! by laejoh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will these rat things be programmed never to break the sound barrier in a populated area?

    1. Re:Jack the sound barrier. Bring the noise! by corerunner · · Score: 1

      no, they are nuclear powered and there's no way to prevent intense chase scenes

      --
      "Don't hate the media, become the media." -Jello Biafra
  22. It's Kevin Warwick. by gedhrel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hugely inflated claims? From Captain Cyborg? To generate press attention?

    Film, as they say, at eleven.

  23. Cylon Raider Prototype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this the first Cylon Raider?

  24. This is a treatment for brain disease? by theCat · · Score: 1

    FTW. Who are they trying to kid? They are building man/machine interfaces. Unless they plan of replacing human CNS components (brain stem?) with electronics then I don't see the connection at all.

    They should just come clean and say what they are doing, which is probably cool in itself, but a little spooky; they are building cyborgs.

    But that isn't going to nail any grants from the NIH, so they go with the "aid to the afflicted" thing. Crap. And if they are going to lie and deflect on the basics, I guess they'll not end it there: Who said those are rat neurons? When does it become not rat neurons but human neurons, who decides that, and who advocates for those human neurons? When it is human, what does that make the rolling "machine" under those neurons -- a mobility assistance device? What if the damned thing exhibits delta waves at some point?

    Send that whole team to a week-long ethics retreat -- every year -- we can *not* afford any f*ckups on this one.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    1. Re:This is a treatment for brain disease? by blincoln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if the damned thing exhibits delta waves at some point?

      I was also thinking along those lines. Since this research uses fetal brain tissue, the animal (or potentially human) brain cells can't really remember being anything else, but it's still pretty eerie trying to imagine what the experience would be like if there were enough cells (however many that is) for consciousness.

      I think there are some amazing potential applications for this type of research, but I also have a feeling that eventually someone is going to create an experimental cyborg like this and realize that it's trying to howl in terror and/or commit suicide.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    2. Re:This is a treatment for brain disease? by theCat · · Score: 1

      [trying to howl in terror and/or commit suicide] Oh it's worse than that; it howls in terror for a decade of days and nights without end *and they aren't even listening*. No wait... they *are* listening but the organism is deemed to be a machine by virtue of being tissue-on-silicon and stripped of human or even animal rights.

      Seriously... how do you QA tissue-on-silicon? How do you conduct unit tests for wetware artifacts like "terrified"? Watch for some kind of regulatory PoC sweetheart bill from the biotechs to make its way through the Legislature that defines all tissue-on-silicon as "inanimate by definition" and hence *legally* incapable of being alive or having thoughts.

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    3. Re:This is a treatment for brain disease? by cparker15 · · Score: 1

      FTW. Who are they trying to kid? They are building man/machine interfaces.

      No, they're building rat/machine interfaces. Duh.

      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

  25. I'll raise you... by whopub · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's nothing compared to the robot-brained rats I've been working on!

  26. Cool name by wcrowe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Rat-Brained Robots" would make a good name for a punk band.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Cool name by vaz01 · · Score: 1

      Uh, it's really not that hard to name a punk band.

      You could be the Revolving Shitsacks or Vagina Melt or Raging Weasel Spleen or...

    2. Re:Cool name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monkey-Brained Robots for a good Rap/HipHop/RnB posse.

  27. obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new rat brained overlords...

  28. Yikes!! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    This is simultaneously one of the more interesting, exciting, and terrifying news Items I've seen a while.

  29. Ohhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So THAT is the secret of Nimh!

  30. Re:I, for one, by BPPG · · Score: 3, Funny

    What are we going to do tomorrow night?

    The same thing we do every night, TRY TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD!

    --
    What's the value of information that you don't know?
  31. Re:Oh No! by SkyDude · · Score: 1

    It's PETA. Not Pain In The Ass (although some do feel that way about them); People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

    People Eating Tasty Animals

    --
    == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  32. Chainsaw hands. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bzzzzzzzzzzz!

  33. Robots with mice brains? by ashmon · · Score: 1

    We are Borg you will be assimilated... STOMP. Assimilate that.

  34. Rats now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RoboCop next!

  35. LOL! by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

    I keep imagining a robot that keeps trying to crawl behind the fridge when you turn on the lights!

    1. Re:LOL! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Nah... they'll just connect the "run behind the fridge" response to the onboard chaingun instead.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  36. Life imitates Snow Crash by DBoneMcShumonster · · Score: 1

    Are these rat things powered by radio-isotopes? If so, I think Stephenson may have some prior art in the area.

  37. More like by Derosian · · Score: 1

    Actually this reminds me of an anime recently released in Japan by the name of Ghost Hound, apparently by the same person who did Ghost in the Shell and supposedly of the same quality. I wouldn't know, I've only seen half the series but what I saw was relatively thought provoking and definitely interesting.

  38. At present it is just an interconnect by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They put a 1V signal in and find a place where a 100mV signal shows itself and take that as an output. That is then used to stimulate the robot platform's turning logic.

    A random bag of paper clips would do the same.

    Call me back when they have decision making.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  39. Future LucasArts project... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny
    Reading about disembodied rat-brains and what George Lucas can do with a script got me thinking about future projects for LucasArts... Announcing the new animated film from George Lucas, Scott Adams and George Romero, Night of the Living Ratbert, featuring the disembodied brain of Jar Jar.
    • Qui-Gon: You almost got us killed. Are you brainless?
    • Jar Jar: I spake.
    • Qui-Gon: The ability to speak does not make you intelligent.
    • Jar Jar: "The Bosses would do terrible tings to me, terrible tings to me if me goin' back dere!"
    • Qui-Gon: "Do you hear that? "
    • Jar Jar:"Yah."
    • Qui-Gon: "That is the sound of a thousand disembodied rat-brains heading this way."
      Off in the distance: "Brains, braaiinnss..."
    • Qui-Gon: (Starts hacking with lightsaber.)
    • Jar Jar: Messa feel strange... Brains, braaiinnss...
    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  40. Sepultura by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does this mean that biotech is no longer godzilla?

  41. Strangelove by Blackhalo · · Score: 1

    How long until we have the first rat-brained cruise missile? ICBM? How far are we ahead of the Chinese in rat-brain technology? How big is the rat-brain GAP? Will anyone miss Wisconsin?

    --
    "There is nothing to do it. But to do it." -Floyd Pepper
    1. Re:Strangelove by argent · · Score: 1

      How long until we have the first rat-brained cruise missile?

      Skinner found that pigeons work better for controlling munitions.

  42. Oh no a meme is coming.... by Dareth · · Score: 1

    All hail our cheese eating robotic overlords!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  43. House of Mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For all we really know, we are nothing more then an AI experiment.

    1. Re:House of Mirrors by daedae · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Nick Bostrom.

    2. Re:House of Mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU or I'll pull the plug on you.

    3. Re:House of Mirrors by beckerist · · Score: 1

      Humans are just the universes way of figuring itself out. My philosophy is that our universe is moving away from entropy. As a result, the more organization that occurs, the more intelligent the universe gets.

      To put it in perspective, humans would be the nerve ending in the tip of a finger (the earth) on a hand (solar system) on an arm (galaxy) of the whole body (universe.) As particles get more organized (less chaotic) we are able to move at a more better pace essentially growing more intelligent at an exponential rate. Just look at the last 25 years, 100? 1000?

      ...until, at least, an asteroid comes along and smashes the earth back into chaotic pieces forcing "us" to start over.

  44. You will be upgraded.. .. hey.. we're down here! by Channard · · Score: 1

    Uh oh.. it can only be a short time until we're under siege from an army of very small Cybermen.

  45. SWEET!!! by AnomaliesAndrew · · Score: 1

    So this means when I get Alzheimer's, I can get a rat-brain-controlled robot to do my chores..?

    --
    Move all sig!
    1. Re:SWEET!!! by Alzheimers · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can't have me for less than $250 a day, and I don't do windows.

  46. Where have all the good people gone? by OxFF52 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I found this article... then checked Slashdot.

    Where have all the intelligent slashdotters gone? Let's all STOP trying to come up with the funniest one-liner and talk about the subject at hand here.

    They have taken brain cells and taught them to control a robot. This is simply freakin' astounding!

    What else has been done related to this such as MEMS? Anyone?

    --
    programming myself into obsolescence
    1. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by AtariKee · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      --
      "You're getting brutal, Sark. Brutal and needlessly sadistic."
      "Thank you, Master Control"
      -Sark and the MCP
    2. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Not quite. I was excited when I saw the headline too. They didn't do any teaching. They took some rat neurons, let them randomly connect, then found an area that gave the response they wanted to a stimulus. And a very simple response at that.

      To me the most interesting part was that they'd found that providing the dish of neurons with some input suppressed bursts of activity.

    3. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 2

      The intelligent ones are still here, mostly. What you see as funny one-liners are intelligent people who are frustrated by over-hyped, almost never delivered technical promises and poorly communicated media publications that are only in it to make a buck. How many times have you heard "revolutionary" or "breakthrough" in an article? True, having robot's controlled by neural tissue is astounding, but let's see something really come out of it before we get to impressed!

    4. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 0

      Personally I made a one-liner because I'm genuinely worried about the potential for something like Cybermen with rats' minds here.

    5. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      ...taught them to control a robot

      See, that's the part I don't get. How do you teach a cluster of brain cells what is and is not acceptable behavior? Do you provide shock therapy until they behave the way you want them too in order to survive?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by z4pp4 · · Score: 1

      Where have all the intelligent slashdotters gone?

      To the intelligent stories to make one-liner responses.

    7. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Where have all the intelligent slashdotters gone? Let's all STOP trying to come up with the funniest one-liner and talk about the subject at hand here.

      I feel like that too. (It might be that I can't write correctly thoug.)

      >>What else has been done related to this such as MEMS? Anyone?

      I read a paper where a research team said that they have done something like that with sockroaches.

      And an another where a reseach team teached a set of living neurons to calculate simple arithmetics.

      And anotherone where some group made a robotic arm which was controlled though brain interface by a monkey. There was a mention .. something like "The monkey took a ball with this arm and trowed another monkey with it"... the monkey eaven played with his new arm. "Like a part of the monkey"

      Then there was an article about rats, who were teached by simulating their brain's reward block.

      And then there are multiple articles about different kind of brain interfaces to human brains too...

    8. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. And I think that you should blame the scoring system

    9. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They left when the 7 digits IDs arrived.

    10. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.nsti.org/Nanotech2008/symposia/Nanotech_Neurology.html

      http://www.bci-info.tugraz.at/bibliography_view

      http://www.wtec.org/bci/workshop/01_Berger_Intro.pdf

      Required steps:

      Manufacture a micro-electrode array (pretty easy at this point)

      Culture neurons (also doable)

      Get the neurons to stick to the array in an orderly manner (this part is tricky: either they don't adhere, they adhere and die, too many adhere to one electrode and the clumps give a messy signal, etc.)

      Wait a couple days and the neurons start firing (a crap shoot, sometimes they croak, get a bio guy to nurture them good)

      Make sense out of the noisy signal (tough, the time scales on the signals is pretty quick)

      Stimulate some neurons, see what the network response is (doable if all the previous steps worked perfectly)

      Problems:
      Power (TFA used 110V out of the wall and a robot battery; not as useful for inside a patient's skull)

      Communications (RF-MEMS is still a work in progress)

      A useful product would be a network of invasive implants that don't cause (much) damage at the implant site and don't lose function over time. Link these to a logic module (outside the brain, but maybe inside the body or skull) that makes sense of the input and can tell the actuators what to stimulate. I think you'll need the logic module outside the invasive implant because you just don't have that much volume to play with in the implant.

      I hope this leads to fruitful stuff. I wasn't very successful at it because my EE wasn't good enough to do the signal processing, my bio wasn't good enough to keep neurons happy or even alive, and I didn't much like working 80 hours/week for $12k/yr. I was good at the wet bench fab and wiring though...

    11. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by jollygreengiantlikes · · Score: 1
      I was confused by this too. This is not spontaneous learning, but rather, the researchers organizing input based on where the neural cluster is creating electrical impulses? Anyone else have thoughts on this?

      Whalley's colleagues Dimitris Xydas and Julia Downes started by connecting a culture to an ultrasound sensor in a wheeled robot. They then record the spikes of voltage produced at points within the culture when signals from the sensor are sent to it. When they find an area that fires consistently when the sensor input reaches it, those signals can be picked up by an electrode and used to, say, make the robot avoid an obstruction. For example, if the ultrasound sensor indicates "wall dead ahead" with a 1 volt signal, and a certain knot of neurons in the culture always generates a 100-microvolt action potential when that happens, the latter signal can be used to make the robot steer right or left to avoid the wall.

    12. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      No kidding. The most interesting thing about this is that apparently it only has an 80% success rate for avoiding walls. I wonder if the 20% failure rate is due to glitchy equipment or if the brain got bored...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    13. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      That would actually be more interesting than what they did.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    14. Re:Where have all the good people gone? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I'm going with boredom. The brain got tired of acting like a wire (signal high in, signal high out) and decided to see what happens when the robot crashes.

  47. What could possibly go wrong? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Seriously... if the outcome of that similar-themed Shadowrun campaign we did all those years ago is any indication, these people need to be stopped at any cost...

  48. How would you like it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What must it be like, to be a brain controlling a robot?

    From the article, I doubt that the mesh of neurons controlling the ratbot is necessarily sufficient to sustain a normal level of rat-consciousness, but what if it was?

    In short, I think this brings us much closer to a very large number of very large ethical questions when it comes to life and the mind. We can (somewhat) safely assume that our current robots are not sentient, but what if they are controlled by biological brains, the DNA of which intended them to be part of a living body?

  49. University of Reading by smoker2 · · Score: 1

    Pronounced "Redding" if you ever need to speak the name aloud. In the same vein as Leicester is pronounced Lester, not Ly-sester.

    1. Re:University of Reading by rfc11fan · · Score: 1

      And brougham is pronounced . . . ?

    2. Re:University of Reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pronounced "Redding"

      Yeah, that's exactly what this guy told me when I jumped on a train leaving from London Paddington at the last minute and asked him if the next stop was "reading". And the look he gave me... Xenophobic mfkr.

  50. Re:Oh No! by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

    They are using tissue cultured from a rat brain. They could have taken a sample of brain tissue and then grown it in the lab. The rat may still be alive. Until we know for sure though, the only conlcusion we can make is that the rat is both alive and dead.

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  51. Someone has to say it... by AtariKee · · Score: 1

    It's alive!!! ALIIIIIIIIVE!!!

    (cue Oingo Boingo...)

    --
    "You're getting brutal, Sark. Brutal and needlessly sadistic."
    "Thank you, Master Control"
    -Sark and the MCP
  52. Mike by majorpayne27 · · Score: 1

    What could possibly go wrong?

  53. Not to mention, actively mapping neurons. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    The eventual capacity to man neurons will bring one of the most vapid lines ever to enter cinema to reality.

    *plugs in* *whooshing sound* "I know kung fu"

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  54. What are the next steps? by deconvolution · · Score: 1

    Start to catch cats?

  55. Slightly varied elderly person by stimpleton · · Score: 1


    Hey! You kids get of my ...Sqeeeak!....damned lawn!

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
  56. I for one by xstonedogx · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one, congratulate the RIAA for taking their first steps.

  57. Re:Oh No! by daedae · · Score: 1

    Somehow seems unlikely. Basically they're taking brain cells from a rat fetus. Now, PETA members should be on the far left, which means they should be supporting stem cell research*, and therefore should be very far away from those on the far right who might complain about aborting rats.

    * This is a one way containment, I'm not implying that only far lefties approve of stem cell research

    Oh, hell... /me ducks behind flame shield and runs from flamebait mod

  58. Re:Rat-Brained overlords RaRaFoRaRo by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Rat Race for Ratty-assed Rangy Robots?

    (That subject is NOT the sound of a chihuahau in my computer.... Plus, I doubt dogs can make the "F" sound, hehe)

    What's next, dog brains in robots? (Nah, some people who defile some Koreans for eating dog meat would be up in robocopic arms if Fido or FiFi ended up in a little robo-chassis..))

    RaRoFo

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  59. SNOW CRASH by Neal Stephenson by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I suggest you check out SNOW CRASH by Neal Stephenson.

    Fido is a good puppy and a pit bull terrier known as a "Rat Thing" by others. He's a biologically-brained robotic guard dog that does bad things to bad people, as he should.

    Andy Out!

    1. Re:SNOW CRASH by Neal Stephenson by OMEGA+Power · · Score: 1

      Finally, I can't believe it took this many posts before someone mentioned Snow Crash.

  60. Re:Rat-Brained overlords RaRaFoRaRaRo?? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Is this the shape of things to come?

    I hear see the "Yo Quero Robo Belle", and Squi-Squi-Squi-Squi-Squi-Sqeeee- and RaRaFoRaRaROH sounds in the combat circles... Olympus battles Zeus/Aphrodite. ZA wins. Will ZA MOUNT Olympus?

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  61. Neurons are better than circuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's actually pretty cool the way neurons work - look them up sometime. Basically at the beginning the pathways are all very similar. As certain pathways generate responses, those pathways get "weighted", or strengthened. This causes good pathways to be reinforced over and over until all the other pathways are so weak as to not be a viable pathway. This is kind of how we "learn". And then all of a sudden something comes along that causes the neurons to use other pathways to try to get the signal through. This causes a different pathway to strengthen, making it a more viable option. As more and more neurons are connected, more and more possible pathways are created. Different stimuli pass through different pathways, again reinforcing a certain path for a certain stimuli. So when you hear a word for the first time, it passes through a seemingly random pathway. As you hear the word more and more, and it's meaning is demonstrated to you over and over (as a mother and father teaches their child to speak), the meaning is connected to the stimuli so that when you receive the stimuli, it travels through the proper channel to the correct meaning in your brain, and you recognize it.

    So putting neurons in robots is actually freaking exciting as hell. But it's not really a "cyborg" - it's not a fully functioning brain, per se. It's just that they've started experminenting using neurons where before there were massive amounts of circuits trying to come to the same decision.

    I can see stem cells taking on a whole new meaning. And how would you nurish a neuron-equipped robot? Surely the protective coating around neurons need replenishing - man, this is actually crazy as hell.

  62. Was I the only one who read the article? by CorporateSuit · · Score: 2, Funny

    FTA (unabridged):

    This work will hopefully contribute to our knowledge of how brains work, but its potential should not be wasted on that, says Potter. "This system is a model. Everything it does is merely similar to what goes on in the brain, it's not really the same thing. We can learn about the boring brain - but when we make sentient Monster Trucks, that will truly be badass." He then pumped his fist 3 times and held up the sign of the goat for a few seconds before returning to a screaming guitar solo.

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  63. Robotic Slavery by Original+Replica · · Score: 4, Interesting

    just as we cast off our own faith in our gods, cursing them and labeling them as myths, our own creations, built in our own image, will inevitably do the same. The only question is this: will our robots succeed in destroying us, or will we succeed in destroying them?

    I don't know if it is a question of destruction or of domination. Will we create a race of AI robots for the sole purpose of enslaving them? If we have the relationship with our robots of Creator/Creation will that make us slave owners once AI achieves sentience? Look at robotic factories, the work long hours for no pay and are modified or replaced or sold at the whim of their owner, if you did that with a person they would be a slave. Of course they are machines not people so it is just a factory not slavery. But if those robots where sentient would it change the moral argument. If that argument concludes that it would in fact be slavery, is there any reason to build AI robots if we cannot treat them as slaves? I don't want to have to allow my Roomba the freedom to go work for someone else, or the right to be paid for it's work.

    --
    We are all just people.
    1. Re:Robotic Slavery by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      How about if we allow our sentient AI to have the job of controlling automated, but non-sentient machinery, and as payment provide for its basic needs such as physical security and electricity? Does that sound fair?

      --
      Fnord.
    2. Re:Robotic Slavery by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      But if those robots where sentient would it change the moral argument.

      Assuming that that was meant to be a question (and you forgot the question mark) rather than a statement (in which case it should have been "it would" rather than "would it"), the answer is that yes, of course it would.

      Now a more pertinent question is "would people in general recognise that the machines were truly sentient and thus should have the same rights that they themselves would expect?". I suspect that most people would not.

    3. Re:Robotic Slavery by ShadowBot · · Score: 1

      Well, What about if we program the sentient robots to LOVE serving us? Afterall, no matter how smart/sentient/independent any creature is all thier base desires are hard coded. Ours may have been hard coded by evolution. But thiers will be hard coded by us.

      Which may or may not be a good thing.

      --
      Quantum Physics a.k.a. sub-molecular statistics
    4. Re:Robotic Slavery by VanGarrett · · Score: 1

      The hard coding of our own basic desires seems dubious. One of our basic desires includes the consumption of food, as this is essential to our survival; eating disorders such as anorexia are directly contrary to this, however, and demonstrate that a maladjusted personality can override even survival instincts. Just the same, incidents of cannibalism such as the Donner Party demonstrate that that needs such as hunger can override familial attachment.

      It seems to me that an AI with hardcoded wants and desires would be too limited and restricted to achieve true sentience. It would be lacking a rather large degree of free will.

    5. Re:Robotic Slavery by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      This is an interesting topic to me, and you seem to take the opposite position, so I'll pose this to you:

      Imagine you as you are now, but embedded with a STRONG desire to put (certain kinds of) widgets together. It would give you immense pleasure and never get boring. Is that a contradiction? Do you think that this strong desire takes away from your free will or sentience?

      Alternatively, imagine that one day you found out that 90% of what you do happened to coincide exactly with what a monkey colony wanted. And further imagine that the monkey colony is otherwise too stupid to be a real threat to you. Would you try to learn which 90% that was so you could stop doing that, even though it means doing something less than what you most perfer? Would you demand the monkeys pay you for doing what you would do anyway, even though the only things they can pay you with are bananas and monkey sex?

      That seems to be the position that a robot in a hypothetical sentient robot factory would find itself in: it has awareness of itself and a deep understanding of the dynamics of the world, but embedded desires such that it wouldn't decide to do anything different, even after realizing its "exploitation" and even given arbitrary enhancements in its abilities.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    6. Re:Robotic Slavery by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

      imagine that one day you found out that 90% of what you do happened to coincide exactly with what a monkey colony wanted. And further imagine...

      Why do all of that imagining when you can just look at how parents interact with children? People will give up money, time, sleep, freedom, they'll even deal with ex-spouses - all in order to serve the interests of their children. How many people train themselves to treat children the same way they treat other adults?

      a hypothetical sentient robot factory

      But why does it have to be sentient if merely intelligent will do? I know all sorts of mental activity comes as a package deal when it comes to humans, but that might not be true for all "minds". Deep Blue doesn't like to play chess, and the genetic algorithms that design new circuits don't want to make people's lives better, so why would a "slave" AI need to have feelings either?

    7. Re:Robotic Slavery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens if you base your morality on some outside set of rules and regulations. Real morality should come from the inside, and should be based on empathy. If you feel like hurting these sentient machines, only then should you stop abusing them.

      But then, empathy is often an abstract concept these days.

  64. as a resident mad scientist by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

    I am thrilled to see this breakthrough. Now we just need to find a way to develop this further so that I can finally finish my sharkbrain controlled lasers.

  65. Just an example of Black Box testing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After reading the article I'm disapointed that the researchers make this claim like the brain issue is knowingly steering the car.

    When you read the article, they just did a series of probing in that, if a wall sensor sends in voltage, see what neuron fires and we'll make THAT the trigger to turn.

    It's more a trial an error than a cognitive test of the brain tissue.

  66. Philosophical can of worms by DustoneGT · · Score: 1

    Does the mass of neurons have consciousness? Does it think, even in a simple way?

    Does it have emotion and feelings?

    A common argument against the possibility of AI is that man-made devices would have no soul. The counter argument to that is why not? Who are you to say God(s) wouldn't give it a soul? Maybe souls are spontaneous and require no divine creation. For those that believe in souls and God(s) this would seem to indicate that souls are capable of interfacing with whatever sort of brain tissue is available. It could be argued that if the mass of neurons has a soul then God doesn't object, or maybe he's a non-interventionist. Or maybe we're just interacting with a sensory-deprived rat soul. Who knows.

    Religion aside, let's look at ethics. Is this a good thing to do? Where do we draw the ethical line? Did we steal the neurons from the unborn rat, or does the rat even care?

    This is a real philosophical can of worms and should fuel some interesting discussion.

  67. Oh by icyslush · · Score: 1

    I thought this was another RIAA article. Oh well...

  68. No but... Re: Climb Stairs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It walks down stairs
    alone or in pairs
    and makes the slinkety sound

  69. Re:I, for one, by Coraon · · Score: 1

    What are we going to do tomorrow night? The same thing we do every night, TRY TO ASSIMILATE THE WORLD!

    There, fixed it for you.

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
  70. There is no limit to hope? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Okay, then, I hope to become a famous male supermodel.

    If you say, "No way", I will say you have become overly sensitive.

  71. Re:Oh No! by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    Schroedinger's Rat?

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  72. We need a Rat in the Shell.... by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    Call me when they have interfaced a disembodied adult rat brain via wi-fi to the Sony Aibo and I will be impressed, before then, don't bother me with this trivial stuff.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  73. Re:Oh No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pain Enema My Ass...

    wait what?

  74. Re:Oh No! by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

    PETA are not really lefties. Proper lefties hate (capitalist) pigs and (running) dogs, and we want to get rid of all the (fat) cats.

  75. We need an expert opinion by Moleculo · · Score: 1

    Someone ask Bush's former bioethics council chairman Leon Kass if this is more or less offensive to bioethical dignity than eating an ice cream cone on the sidewalk.

  76. It's just in-vitro, what's the big deal? by ViennaSt · · Score: 1

    Like most in-vitro research, these results may or may not give an indication to what sort of applications may come from the results (ie. a robot controlled by a change in a neuron's membrane potential). However, it won't be until these neuroscientists get a robot to respond to field potentials from an ALIVE cortically implanted rat (or another in-vivo model) will the results be useful enough to apply to remedial research. These results to people who study neuronscience are not a big deal--getting a predictable electrical response from a group of neurons in a petri dish is not a problem--these neurons have ion channels which are voltage gated and respond quite predictably to changes in membrane potential (the concentrations of ions around the membrane). I don't know why everyone is thinking live rats are controlling robots.

    --
    "Engineering. Where the noble, semi-skilled laborers execute the vision of those who think and dream." -Sheldon
  77. Next Step by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

    Looks like the neurons currently don't have feedback. Adding feedback would be neat. Of course, hitting a wall is negative, finding "food" or avoiding a wall would be negative. I don't know the actual mechanism for feedback/training that the brain uses, but try to trigger it.

    So, the current project exploits reflex behavior -- expand it to learned behavior.

    See if the little buggers can train themselves...

    --
    Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  78. Blue Death by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    If real rats can be a vector for a real virus (Black Death) then imagine what kind of vector these rats might be (BLUE screen of DEATH)!

    (yes, I know, I know. It was the fleas. But still...)

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  79. Re:Oh No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no. Not PETA. PITA. As in the bread. Rat Neurons mixed in with some humus - delicious.

  80. Think of the children... by mpthompson · · Score: 1

    The team at the University of Reading in the UK hope their research will help provide treatments for diseases like Alzheimer's and epilepsy.

    Or, a whole new line of really cool robotic rat-brain controlled toys.

  81. Would you put your brain in a robot body? by MoronGames · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why? I like my body. I love my body...

    --
    hey!
    1. Re:Would you put your brain in a robot body? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd do it. If it was anything like Ghost in the Shell, it would be pretty sweet.

  82. Re:Oh No! by xenn · · Score: 1

    PITA?

    like what they wrap a doner kebab in?

    I always wondered what that doner option on my drivers license meant...

  83. Nothing, because... by Chemisor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nothing, because rats do not like cheese.

  84. As usual, PKD was there first by uglyMood · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure of the publication date, but probably in the late 1950s to early-1960s Philip K. Dick wrote a novel where the hero had a reel-to-reel stereo system that had to be watered and fed every day because its electronics depended on living brain cells as circuitry. (I think the cells came from some weird sentient slime mold they found on Ganymede.)

    Now, aside from the automatic-cool factor of a PKD connection, I find these Frankenstein-type experiments troubling from a moral standpoint. (Anyone that knows me personally probably just blew coffee out of their noses.)

    I'm a rabid technophile, but animals do experience terror and therefore are aware on some level. These experiments, admittedly still in the rudimentary stages, are generally headed toward using living animal brains to control machines. I can't imagine a more horrifying situation for a creature that didn't volunteer for it. (I, for one, would actually consider it, but it'd have to be one damned cool robot.)

    I guess I feel the same way about these sort of things as I do when reading of consciousness continuing after human decapitations for a minute or longer. Just because something can be done doesn't mean it needs to be. And this feels really, really wrong to me.

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you probably are." -- Buckaroo Heisenberg
  85. So.. by jvkjvk · · Score: 2, Funny

    A real stainless steel rat?

  86. By Neruos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, sigh.. where to start.

    1. neurons firing with a electronic interface does not make a cyborg.
    2. only humans have self-awareness and self-consciousness, no other animal on earth to date has this.
    3. a rat brain is a rat brain, you hook it up to a computer, it will not act human, unless the software/hardware interface may allow it to appear as such or even do things that we humans can do, but this does not make it any more then a rat with a human helping hand.
    4. etc etc etc.............. /blah //I give up

  87. AI coming soon to a robot factory near you by houbou · · Score: 1

    Amazing. It reminds me of the concept of the "Quantum Leap" computer, where neurons from 2 humans are used as the basis of the core brain of the "Quantum" computer named Ziggy.

    Science-fiction is becoming less and less fiction, so, I tell you, we sure do live in interesting times, and I'm glad to be a part of this.

    The possibilities for this are tremendous! For instance, imagine for the blind, a tool based on this technology which would allow them to be able to know what they face around them! A talking "virtual" seeing eye dog application so to speak! I know the goal for the blind is to restore their sight, but this is an alternative until its done. Imagine this in situation where you require an unmanned probe with some form of decision making process, should there be something that could be a threat to its functions.

    I could go on here, but, again.. wow this is really cool news!

  88. What about PETA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, I really think PETA people will go crazy over this. Their hateful screams will range from 'don't do this to the rats!!!' to 'robots are our friends, don't experiment with them'.

  89. Rat brained underlings you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our rat-brained robotic powered, laser equiped, genetically altered, landshark overlords.

  90. Wow. by AnomaliesAndrew · · Score: 1

    That was amazing. :-)

    --
    Move all sig!
  91. Duh again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always thought this was the best approach to "AI" for robots. Put animal brains in them or give animals robotic limbs...basically animal cyborgs. Our ancestors depended on animals in much the same way we depend on robots and machinery, so it makes perfect sense to me. We have thousands of years of experience of training animals to do what we want. With some remote control systems in their robotic bodies, we have even more effective means of training them. the big plus to me is that, with no software "AI" in control, it rules out the possibility of a "Skynet". However, yes, there is a "planet of the apes" risk, but that's what that remote control "off switch" is for :)

  92. Pity the test animals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Vivisection is sick and should be stopped. We don't condone the "research" nazis did on jews. When will animals have any rights on this planet? When will the torture stop?

    1. Re:Pity the test animals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they stop tasting so damned good.

      Oh, and being useful for research like this.

      Or when they get a lawyer and file a class action lawsuit.

    2. Re:Pity the test animals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human embryos aren't even protected. What makes rats more special than people?

  93. I read the posts...I LuL'd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool [^ _ ^] Anonymous Coward!

    Hey guys, why do you care so much about gods and the end of the world and stuff like that?

    Isn't it obvious that what you do and the way you live concerns only one person, and that's you? ...dude..some people here sound just like those crazies on the side walk...

    I mean, it's not like it matters either way..
    your going to be dead right?
    ( or ALIVE!!! if your super super religious. )

  94. YAIFO (Yet Another "I For One....") by TrebleMaker · · Score: 1

    Signature says it all:

    --
    In Soviet Russia a beowulf cluster of these things imagines you welcoming your new, neural-network overlords.
  95. Garth Marenghi was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbiWH1xqeqQ&feature=related

  96. What is wrong is FRAUD. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    "Why is it wrong for scientists to attract attention?"

    Of course, it is not wrong. What is wrong is LYING to get attention. What is wrong is Slashdot carrying a lot of stories about fake science that happens to want investors.

    Most people don't know the meaning of science, yet know it is important. It is easy to take advantage of them.

    1. Re:What is wrong is FRAUD. by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "What is wrong is Slashdot carrying a lot of stories about fake science that happens to want investors.

      This site is about the comments. The articles feed the debates, sometimes science is seen as crap and sometimes it's the other way around. I know of no other place where after the initial mod frenzy settles can you find such an array of both proffesional and amature experts commenting on the internet equivalent of the "science" section in a global newsagent. All other science orientated boards I know of are either special interest or have crappy moderation/threading systems.

      Your sig talks about the importance of knowing the meaning of science and you mention fake science in you post. I can think of no better tool for quickly determing the difference than to have the issue posted on slashdot and subsequently fiercly debated over the next 24hrs by hundreds of geeks and moderated/read by hundreds of thousands more geeks many of them who indeed know the meaning of science, law, economics, maths, philosphy, etc.

      If all you do on slashdot is post your opinion or RTFA then you are missing the point, wether by design or accident it serves the role of skeptic to your own assumptions about what appears in the press. Outright lies, voodoo and sock-puppets are pounced apon, for the rest of the articles the moderated version is rarely clear cut, sometimes biased, always informative, and often humorous.

      In otherwords if you cannot understand that a story about rat brained robots was just made for slashdot then I think it's time to hand in your geek card.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  97. More pseudo-science from Slashdot. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that comment. I knew nothing about Kevin Warwick until I read the Wikipedia article about him. He's not really involved in science, apparently, it's theater.

  98. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?

    It sure would pack a lot of cheese!

  99. Old News by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    Story is old news. They've had these robots working in post offices in the US for years.

  100. Rat Brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell are they using rat brain for? How do they expect to equip sharks with lasers running tests on Rat brains?!

    But seriously folks, where's the whatcouldpossiblygowrong tag?

    Or the obligatory Futurama killbot references? I mean, does this thing have a reset switch for the kill counter or what?