Slashdot Mirror


A Full-Time 2-Way Video Link To Grandparents?

uid7306m writes "We have elderly parents who live a long way off. However, my technological radar tells me that it's possible to set up a 24/7 video link between our kitchen and theirs. It'd be good for our kids and good for the parents, and we can now get pretty cheap nearly unlimited broadband connections at this end (UK). What's the best way to do it? Has anyone tried it? On the far end, it ought to have, in Dilbert's(TM) immortal words 'One big button on it, and we push it for you in the factory.'"

240 comments

  1. Apple iChat by rlobue · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use Apple's iChat. Of course you need a Mac but I talk for hours full screen to my relatives around the world. With two semi-good broadband connections, it works flawlessly and the quality is second to none (in this price range). Of course the downside is that you'd both need Macs.

    1. Re:Apple iChat by Holi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why not Skype, I use that on my mac to talk with my friend in Hawaii who uses Linux on here laptop. Video quality is very good. Now if only my MBP had better speakers.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:Apple iChat by )parenthesis( · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, a PC with the Windows AIM client works very well with a Mac running iChat. I do it with my friends in Ohio all the time. So you could get your grandparents a cheap MacBook (or Mini), and you (assuming you're running a Windows box) only have to pitch in for a AIM-compatible webcam. Or if you wanted to go the Linux route, you could use Skype on your Platform Of Choice(tm).

    3. Re:Apple iChat by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I thought video didn't work on the Linux version of Skype.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    4. Re:Apple iChat by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    5. Re:Apple iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works...horribly. But it works. As long as you don't both want to run a webcam at the same time, because then it will crash 9 out of 10 times.

    6. Re:Apple iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      it does since version 2.0
      I sometimes use it on eee-pc, but ekiga remains a much better choice on Linux - at least if you have control over your network's firewall.

      I have ekiga running 24/7 in video mode when my wife has to travel for work, and it works very nicely.

    7. Re:Apple iChat by penguinbrat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Skype also has the API that you could always write a simple bash script to use, I believe it uses DCOP for the calls. Don't know how extensive it is, but any API can be very useful in obtaining the ultimate '1 click' stop and shop deal... Not sure if it is still active but they used to have it where communication between Skype accounts were free, there is also a ZOOM modem like thing for Skype now, pretty cheap at Wally world, that you can hook a normal phone up to it.

    8. Re:Apple iChat by neumayr · · Score: 1

      It does, and for me, it's pretty stable.
      But there's no support for that "High Quality" feature the Windows version is supposed to have. Which is a shame, as the default resolution sucks.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    9. Re:Apple iChat by rwven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just for anyone who hasn't tried iChat, I've used a LOT of video conferencing software and iChat's video conferencing is leaps and bounds ahead of anything else out there for the mainstream.

      I have no idea what they do to preserve so much video quality on the trip, but it's astoundingly good. Comparing it to Skype or regular AIM (or MSN or what-have-you) chat is pretty laughable and anyone who's really compared will vouch for that.

    10. Re:Apple iChat by Simon+(S2) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why not Skype

      Just because you ask: I think some of us don't like a 12MB encrypted binary executable file running on our system that nobody except the creators know what it does.

      --
      I just don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.
    11. Re:Apple iChat by abigor · · Score: 4, Informative

      On Linux, Skype uses DBUS and X11 messaging. On Windows, it's a COM object. Either way, you are correct, it's pretty easy to get something up and running quickly - a simple gui written in PyQt with a single button: "Talk to Kids".

    12. Re:Apple iChat by ches · · Score: 4, Informative

      ichat worked well with my wife in Beijing and my daughter in Edinburgh this summer. iChat allowed simultaneous conversations, skype doesn't, AFAIK.

      One fun thing: inviting my wife 12 time zones away over to dinner with friends. The Mac is like Elijah, doesn't eat much, and cause dinner conversation worked well. Poor video quality wasn't a bother.

      ches

    13. Re:Apple iChat by )parenthesis( · · Score: 1

      Skype 2.0 has video love for linux: (this is way back in November 2007, but I couldn't find something more recent with my quick search)

    14. Re:Apple iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you not been following slashdot?

      Skype's going to spy on you, not to mention it's closed, and it's being routed through their servers.

    15. Re:Apple iChat by Z34107 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just because you ask: I think some of us don't like a 12MB encrypted binary executable file running on our system that nobody except the creators know what it does.

      Well, if disk space is an issue, just gzip it or something. But, gosh, for 12MB... You should delete a few things, man.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    16. Re:Apple iChat by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, iChat functionality may be cool (shared desktop and showing applications and such to), to bad the UI isn't (Why do they use multiple contact lists for instance? Fixable with a third party fix/plugin/patch/...) but most important since Jabber doesn't offer webcam support yet and everyone around uses MSN they need to support MSN or I won't use it because it's no fun talking to yourself all the time.

      Not that I have many friends or people added anyway. I tend to remove MSN contacts and my IRL circle are small so ..

      Also why doesn't Apple let me use the resolution my webcam can actually handle? (MBP with high-res cam)

    17. Re:Apple iChat by aliquis · · Score: 1

      ... that and it's not compatible with anything else due to said reason.

    18. Re:Apple iChat by Mr.+Jerry · · Score: 0

      Of course the downside is that you'd both need Macs.

      Why is that a downside? at least its a solution that would actually work..

    19. Re:Apple iChat by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just because you ask: I think some of us don't like a 12MB encrypted binary executable file running on our system that nobody [blackhat.com] except the creators know what it does.

      It appears to make phone calls over the Internet and to POTS phones. Mystery solved.

    20. Re:Apple iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you ask: I think some of us don't like a 12MB encrypted binary executable file running on our system that nobody except the creators know what it does.

      Well, if disk space is an issue, just gzip it or something. But, gosh, for 12MB... You should delete a few things, man.

      If it is encrypted properly, gzip won't reduce the size of it.

    21. Re:Apple iChat by mveloso · · Score: 1

      Video quality is good compared to CIF. Compared to iChat, skype video is really bad.

    22. Re:Apple iChat by syousef · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Why not Skype, I use that on my mac to talk with my friend in Hawaii who uses Linux on here laptop

      Liar!!! We all know chicks don't run Linux!

      (Note: Lest you think I really am a jerk, I assure you the above is a joke only. I actually learnt kernel hacking from these ladies:
      http://www.linuxchix.org/content/courses/kernel_hacking/
      I don't agree with their politics as I find it too separatist, but this was one fantastic tutorial and I have no problem crediting a female for work well done)

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    23. Re:Apple iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another iChat vote. My family is spread across three countries and 13 hours of time zones. We are now all Mac users simply because iChat is the _only_ real option for video chat. It's the killer app.

      I'm a GNU/Linux user otherwise. Skype is shite for its performance and for its trojan horse qualities.

    24. Re:Apple iChat by Holi · · Score: 0, Troll

      oh and iChat is so fucking open. Wait no it's not. it's just as closed as skype.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    25. Re:Apple iChat by KGIII · · Score: 1

      It appears to make phone calls over the Internet and to POTS phones. Mystery solved.

      That means the problem isn't solved. That is what is appears to do. As it is also good at managing to bypass firewalls (as I understand) who knows what else it can do, does, or could be made to do?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    26. Re:Apple iChat by Holi · · Score: 1

      if you are going to credit someone for work well done, why the fuck does their sex matter.

      You really have to understand that a lot of girls are smarter than you.

      Mmmm girls smarter than me are my biggest turn on.

      pardon me it's 4:30am and I just left my bar so yes I am drunk. and yes my ex wife was smarter than me but hell she's smarter than anyone else i have ever met.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    27. Re:Apple iChat by syousef · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      if you are going to credit someone for work well done, why the fuck does their sex matter.

      It doesn't. It was a joke, playing against the slashdot meme of Ug Us Men Women No Use Linux.

      You really have to understand that a lot of girls are smarter than you.

      That ain't hard. Some days I think my labrador is much smarter than me. Intelligence is a very hard thing to quantify.

      Mmmm girls smarter than me are my biggest turn on.

      pardon me it's 4:30am and I just left my bar so yes I am drunk. and yes my ex wife was smarter than me but hell she's smarter than anyone else i have ever met.

      Explains the post. Hope you sleep it off well, and the ex is an ex for a reason. Move on.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    28. Re:Apple iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the real world.

      In the real world we have FLOSS alternatives. If you want you can join us.

    29. Re:Apple iChat by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know, but this sub thread was about iChat, which depends on about 3 gigs of encrypted code, the majority of which only the dark Apple overlords knows what goes on inside of.

      Telephone networks, network switches at your ISP, cell phones, gmail, name servers, and non-local web servers all have code invisible to the end user.

      So, we might as well get paranoid enough to shun all modern communications technology if we are going to get our panties in a wad over a single closed source program.

    30. Re:Apple iChat by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I'd recommend a brief search about the potential issues with Skype and security. I'm not advocating anything other than awareness. (I don't even use either of the two products when I do happen to video chat.) However... Skype does some "nasty" things like bypass firewalls without explaining how, as per my understanding, so that people were able to use it in a corporate environment.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    31. Re:Apple iChat by quenda · · Score: 3, Funny

      As it is also good at managing to bypass firewalls (as I understand) who knows what else it can do, does, or could be made to do?

      "What makes Skype so terrifying, said the FCC, is the fact that no program needs to be exchanged for a new computer to be infected. It can be spread through the existing e-mail systems of the InterNet. Once a computer is infected, one of several things can happen. If the computer contains a hard drive, that will most likely be destroyed. If the program is not stopped, the computer's processor will be placed in an nth-complexity infinite binary loop - which can severely damage the processor if left running that way too long. Unfortunately, most novice computer users will not realize what is happening until it is far too late. "

    32. Re:Apple iChat by swillden · · Score: 0

      Define "bypass firewalls".

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    33. Re:Apple iChat by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      [blockquote] ... that and it's not compatible with anything else due to said reason.
      [/blockquote]

      and AIM, ICQ, XMPP, Yahoo, MSN, GoogleTalk....

    34. Re:Apple iChat by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      12 MB is an issue? I spend 1000 MB on Star Wars: Episode II, and that's a shitty movie.

      Anyway, I know what it does: it lets you chat with people over the web, video and audio included. It's basically AOL Instant Messenger or MSN Messenger done right. (Meaning, it actually works cross-platform, the audio quality is much better, it's future-proofed, etc)

    35. Re:Apple iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Writing a gui in PyQt is 'One big button on it, and we push it for you in the factory' ?

    36. Re:Apple iChat by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know there are floss alternatives, but to tell you the truth, the waterpik just doesn't get the stuff out from in between my teeth.

    37. Re:Apple iChat by KGIII · · Score: 1

      To leave your network without express permission. I understand that it is very difficult, near impossible really, to effectively prohibit skype's packets.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    38. Re:Apple iChat by sootman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've got a baby, a mac, and several distant relatives, some with macs and some with PCs. iChat is noticably better than skype. As a bonus 10.5 has screen sharing built in too, just as easy to use.

      For extra ease if use, Google for the terminal command to make iChat auto-accept incoming requests.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    39. Re:Apple iChat by swillden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, you're talking about the fact that Skype will use port 80 if its default port isn't available. Much ado about nothing.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    40. Re:Apple iChat by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that it could use alternatives and do so quite well but it appears as that is either no longer the case or I was misunderstanding.

      4 Security flaws:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skype_security#Security_flaws

      Nothing *too major* there really.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    41. Re:Apple iChat by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      12 MB is an issue? I spend 1000 MB on Star Wars: Episode II, and that's a shitty movie.

      I'd have thought it was obvious (as others have already pointed out) that the guy's issue was that a closed-source app that size could contain countless undocumented backdoors and other subterfuges. Whether this is actually the case or a good argument is beside the point.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    42. Re:Apple iChat by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      Alright, someone got modded Interesting for being funny here.

      Hard drives are not destroyed by a virus. Only the data on them is.

      CPUs are not destroyed by mathematical computations, otherwise there would be many wiped out by bugs in code every day.

      "InterNet" :)

    43. Re:Apple iChat by aliquis · · Score: 1

      What? Skype supports other protocols now? Full support?

      Even if it does no-one can use another client and communicate over "skype."

      By a first look I can't see anything about aim, icq and so on, what was your point?

    44. Re:Apple iChat by nosfucious · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      The average dog is way smarter than the average human. Show me one dog with a job and kids? (not that I have kids ... that i know about).

      --
      Q:I was listening to a CD in Grip and it sounded horrible! What's up? A:Perhaps you are listening to country music
    45. Re:Apple iChat by drik00 · · Score: 1

      Two sad things here:

      1. He said it was an executable *RUNNING* on his system that he didn't like.

      2. This is +5 Funny? Poster or moderator, who's worse?

      J

      --
      Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    46. Re:Apple iChat by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      I was referring the Apple iChat.....the subject of the post.

    47. Re:Apple iChat by aliquis · · Score: 1

      But my answer was to a post about why people wouldn't use Skype.

      Talk about iChat somewhere else, and iChat doesn't support MSN or Yahoo either, and I doubt they can keep XMPP support up to date all the time either since it's unlikely to be updated between OS revisions.

  2. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    24/7? Guess no more going out to the kitchen in your undies for a late night snack.

    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's not an issue. In the UK, it's pretty chilly most of the year, so there's very little incentive to wander around in much less than a furry bathrobe.

    2. Re:hmm by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Yea you might run into your grandfather doing the same thing.

      Ugh...

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:hmm by wisty · · Score: 1

      No midnight snacks for Grandpa, either.

    4. Re:hmm by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, while we may not be quite so advanced as our glorious cousins on the other side of the Atlantic, most of us in the UK do in fact have heating in our houses.

    5. Re:hmm by uid7306m · · Score: 1

      You're not a Real Brit, then. Real Brits turn off the heat on 1 March and don't turn it back on until 1 November. Central heating is for wimp and colonials.

  3. Bad idea by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unless you want your kids to see grandpa giving it to grandma over the kitchen sink, I wouldn't recommend it.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wait. I think there's a channel dedicated to that kink.

    2. Re:Bad idea by Hokie06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or worse yet do you really want grandpa doing a 5 finger salute while he watches you give it to your wife on the kitchen table.

      --
      Kilroy was here.
    3. Re:Bad idea by Nipok+Nek · · Score: 1, Troll

      Rule 34. If there wasn't, there is now...

      --
      Why choose white shoes?
    4. Re:Bad idea by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Technically, that would be rule 35.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    5. Re:Bad idea by Onetus · · Score: 1

      Nope. It's Rule #34 of the internet.

      Our parent poster is indicating that because of Rule 34, the channel will now exist.

    6. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious! rofl :)

    7. Re:Bad idea by fmobus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rule 34 says:
      There is porn of it. No exceptions

      Rule 35 says:
      If no porn is found at the moment, it will be created.

    8. Re:Bad idea by hkmarks · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rule #34: If it exists, there's porn of it.

      Rule #35: If there's no porn of it, porn of it will be made.

    9. Re:Bad idea by Clarious · · Score: 1

      Japan already has that for a while: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1815509,00.html?imw=Y : Japan's Booming Sex Niche: Elder Porn

  4. In the us unlimited broadband may be going away... by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    In the us unlimited broadband may be going away and isp's like comcarp do don like steaming video.

  5. Skype... by purduephotog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... but that might be too complicated.

    I could see some advantages of streaming both ways to large flat panels. I think it would be a bit intrusive, though, because as much as I love my parents I'm very glad there is a 10 hour distance between us.

    If all else fails you could just do a webcast. While interestingly linked, I just can't get into the concept too much for fear that one day I might see my mother in law staring back at us ;)

    1. Re:Skype... by plenTpak · · Score: 5, Informative

      Skype might be good enough, because you can set it to auto-start, and you can set it to auto-accept calls (so you can initiate the calls from your end) and I think you can set it to auto-start in full-screen. That way, once you have it all set up, the most they'll have to do is turn on the physical power, and you'll be able to initiate the connection from your end.

    2. Re:Skype... by peragrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually if they already have large flat panel monitors, use a small computer like a mac mini, or one of the mini itx boards. Mount the video camera either above ore below the display and conceal it slightly if needed.

      that way they could simply push a couple of buttons on a remote and activate it. you get the big veiw, comfy chairs, of the living room while you chat.

      As long as you can turn it off occasionally it isn't bad.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Skype... by entrylevel · · Score: 5, Funny

      I told you never to call me on this wall!

      --
      Karma: Incomprehensible (Mostly affected by posting at +5, reading at -1, and metamoderating everything unfair.)
    4. Re:Skype... by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And change the combination on my luggage!

  6. Re:In the us unlimited broadband may be going away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheech Marin? Is that you?

  7. webcam video cast by joocemann · · Score: 1

    do it from both ends and view at each side.

    webcam video streaming has been available for years.

    1. Re:webcam video cast by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yup. VLC passing off to a Darwin Streaming Server and being viewed by VLC on the other end. Easy to do, no issues until power goes out

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:webcam video cast by ZosX · · Score: 1
      "do it from both ends and view at each side."

      Why does this just sound so wrong?

    3. Re:webcam video cast by joocemann · · Score: 1

      because you are tying in what YOU use the webcam for and then imagining using it for a 24/7 correlative webcam experience involving your parents...

      could be pretty dirty.

  8. Set top video conferencing appliance by weregeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am sure that there are other similar products, and at under $150 a piece, something like the DLink DVC-1000 here: http://www.dlink.com/products/?sec=1&pid=8 would be hard to beat in terms of simplicity.

    --
    Those willing to give up freedom for the sake of short term security, deserve neither freedom nor security.
    1. Re:Set top video conferencing appliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I was about to suggest. We used it here at work for a very rudimentary/cheap videoconferencing setup until we wised up & went with Polycom.. But I did refer to the DVC's as the 'calling grandma' appliance. No PC required, they hook up to your TV, what could be easier..

    2. Re:Set top video conferencing appliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have worked with these units with a sign language interpreter before... they are stable and easy to use.

    3. Re:Set top video conferencing appliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DLink DVC-1000 is a crappy product. Good idea, but poor quality camera and general implementation.

    4. Re:Set top video conferencing appliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The half-duplex audio on the DVC-1000 would probably not be ideal for this application.

  9. iChatAV on OS X by piper5ul · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have tried it on numerous occasions - it is solid for home-home comminications.

    Also, everything is just a click away!

    You can also use skype but the quality is not consistent. Also, too many clicks.

  10. Bandwidth caps? by el_chupanegre · · Score: 5, Informative

    Are you with a decent ISP? (If there is such a thing)

    If you are with Virgin Media then you will easily exceed their bandwidth limits which you can find at the bottom of this page.

    I'm not sure what other ISPs set their limits at (or if they publish them at all like VM do) but I'm pretty sure you would exceed them also.

    I'd think about the possibility of other options, such as simply using a video-call when required. Most of the time you would simply be streaming video of 2 empty kitchens to each other wouldn't you?

    1. Re:Bandwidth caps? by Crookdotter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't there a way to only stream frames if they are changing? I would have thought that's how it's done now anyway - so that only useful, changing data is transmitted. When both kitchens are empty, the video stream isn't sending any data.

    2. Re:Bandwidth caps? by el_chupanegre · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a way to only stream frames if they are changing? I would have thought that's how it's done now anyway - so that only useful, changing data is transmitted. When both kitchens are empty, the video stream isn't sending any data.

      Better not have a clock in the background or something then...

    3. Re:Bandwidth caps? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a way to only stream frames if they are changing?

      Computer based setups can come with software that does motion sensing, but that isn't what the submitter wants and I'm not sure you'll find motion sensing in a stand-alone video conferencing appliance.

      Even if it was there, what's the point of sending video if no one on the other end is watching?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:Bandwidth caps? by anagama · · Score: 5, Informative

      motion.

      http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/

      feature list:

      http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/MotionFeatureList

      You could have it trigger an external program to get that "one big button set at the factory" effect merely by walking into the kitchen.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    5. Re:Bandwidth caps? by torstenvl · · Score: 1

      depending on what the gain is set at... the cam will pick up all kinda of background light (and radiation)

    6. Re:Bandwidth caps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Are you with a decent ISP? (If there is such a thing)

      If you are with Virgin Media then you will easily exceed their bandwidth limits which you can find at the bottom of this page.

      ... Most of the time you would simply be streaming video of 2 empty kitchens to each other wouldn't you?

      Well, yes. Empty kitchens are the most common state. It depends a lot on the compression algorithm, I suppose. In principle, an empty kitchen takes very little bandwidth to transmit.

      So, if one had compression software that was optimized for the 24/7 kitchen case, it would be
      doing perhaps 256kbit/sec when someone was walking around, but only 5kbit/second when nothing was moving.

      24/7 x 96kbit/sec = 28 Gbyte/month. That actually fits within a small business ADSL plan for GBP 24/month. If it spent 80% of the day transmitting nearly nothing, you'd be down to about 6 gigabytes/month, which you can get from lots of ISPs for less than 20 pounds per month.

    7. Re:Bandwidth caps? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nah, make a point of getting an analog clock with no seconds hand; you have an instant way of double-checking that the link is actually active, and a handy timeout prevention device. One frame per minute isn't going to kill your bandwidth.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    8. Re:Bandwidth caps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's funny how much people like to unnecessary complicate easy things. Reminds me of that "Big Bang Theory" chapter were the guys try assempling an IKEA furniture and end up "refactoring it".

      Use Skype, iChat or whatever chat app with video capabilities you like most. I'm using Skype with my parents and inlaws on a daily basis and works fine.

      Or, at least, get a life ;)

    9. Re:Bandwidth caps? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Why analog? A digital clock would do the same thing. You know that on a digital clock it changes also every minute, right? You could even use a clock on the PC and use a mirror.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    10. Re:Bandwidth caps? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 0

      Why digital? Analog clocks are nice, hang on the wall, often run off of batteries.

      ...the clock on the PC and a mirror

      You're young, and an INTP, aren't you?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    11. Re:Bandwidth caps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh yes "Unlimited* broadband", where everything** is Unlimited* except the small print which detail just how limited*** the limitations are.

      * - limited
      ** - except our ability to contradict
      *** - very limited

      However, there are exceptions; find the smaller ISPs who clearly state (and truly uphold) their much larger caps. 3GB/month is tiny, especially considering Virgin are promoting their BBC iPlayer abilities too.

      I went with a reseller of Entanet (Adsl24), whose plans are based around the data used. And unlike Virgin Media, the smaller ISPs generally have 1 month contracts too.

      Checkout the comparisons, the big companies performances tend to be unlimited* too.

    12. Re:Bandwidth caps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score: 5?

      Erm, does any video chat software really timeout based on lack of changes in the picture?

      If it did, would one clock movement per minute be enough to keep it alive? Such a sensitive system would almost never actually time out! Even the fluctuations in daylight from a window would probably satisfy it.

      And how is the clock going to stop timeouts at night... you leave the lights on 24/7?

  11. Ekiga by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you have a Linux distribution, there is 'ekiga' which allows you to run video conferencing.

    But I've always wondered if there was something simpler that wouldn't need to go through a third party server, and would allow the webcam window to be resized.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  12. Grandma says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't slouch, eat a banana!

    Um, you sure you want to do this?

    1. Re:Grandma says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the last thing I want while making live in the kitchen. Oh...you probably meant breakfast. Yeah, that'd be bad, too.

    2. Re:Grandma says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that what the kids are calling it?

  13. Skype by mrbah · · Score: 4, Informative

    Install Skype at both ends and start a video call between them. Enable full screen mode and presto, you have a 24/7 live video link.

    1. Re:Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition.

  14. iChat by Durandal6 · · Score: 1

    Yes, iChat would be ideal. Aside some initial expense, just go out and get a couple of iMacs and run iChat (or Adium) between them. One click happiness.

    1. Re:iChat by sych · · Score: 1

      Er, Adium doesn't do video.

  15. Pay through the nose but get a working system... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Get an embedded video-conferencing system.

    Polycom e.g. has some nice systems, one of the smaller ones is the V700.

    They come with a pricetag of 2500 EUR but work. I guess your grandparents don't wanna fiddle with the software on their machine or something similar.

  16. stickam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are so many options out there this topic is kind of ridiculous. I fail to see what you need that is different from everything that is out there.

  17. Magic Wall by Crookdotter · · Score: 1

    I've often thought that full res, projector sized displays could project one room into another with a similar setup for family use. Maybe better than just a single camera - perhaps an array of cameras - giving the input. With the right setup it could almost look as if a wall is just a hole to another room, thousands of miles away. I wonder if this effect could be increased - projection on a one way screen, with cameras behind to change perspective which tracks the observer on the 'other side'. Couldn't this give a changing correct perspective view for both ends? Probably for one viewer only - or maybe with polarised shutter glasses or something it could display for everyone? If you work hard enough, a magic wall seems eminently possible. On a side note I've always thought that a rubber sheet on a wall could be a terrific method of contact - with an array of small rams on the other side to deform it and a copy at the other end, with rams able to feedback a force - you push a handprint into it and it's transmitted elsewhere and you'd be able to touch across the net.

    1. Re:Magic Wall by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 0

      Duh, just install a Star Trek TNG-style holodeck on one half of a large living room at your house and at the house a thousand miles away. Then you could actually see the people and even interact with them, as their real selfs will be projected in 3D into your holodeck and you will be projected into theirs. You could even get into an argument and beat each other up.

      --
      McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
  18. Home made thing. by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 5, Informative

    At your gramp's kitchen, two options:

    If you're not very adventurous: Any computer. Any video conferencing software (such as Skype). VPN software (such as OpenVPN). VNC software (such as RealVNC). The best is if you get a computer where the screen and computer are in the same enclosure. You don't even hook up a keyboard or a rat. If something happens, you lgo on their desktop thru the VPN and VNC and click on Skype again or whatever.

    If you are very adventurous. Buy a nice flat screen display. Take the damn thing apart and get rid of all the crap except the screen and whatever signal massaging hardware is hooked up to it. Get a single board x86 computer that has a watchdog chip on it and built-in flash and tons of RAM for your software installation. Attach it and the screen's signal massaging hardware to one side of a rectangular piece of sheet metal the size of the display, and attach the display on the other side of it. Make that sheet metal a bit taller than the display. Get a camera with built-in microphone; take it apart, and attach it above the display. This probably requires drilling a few holes, tapping is optional, and will probably require some nuts, standoffs, etc. Run the wires however you can, preferably the shortest distance possible. Make an enclosure for this out of wood or something. Install Linux, OpenVPN, X, VNC, and your video conferencing software (something like Ekiga, hacked to automatically initiate a connection to you upon startup) into the flash in such a manner that upon power-up or reset, the entire flash partition is copied into RAM that's treated as a partition and booted from there. At all other times, the flash is never touched. Upon the computer crashing, locking up, or being h4x0red/0wn3d/etc., (which might happen once in a while), the watchdog will reboot it, so a fresh, original filesystem image is loaded back into the RAM and rebooted. This can happen in a matter of a minute from reset thru the videoconferencing software coming up again. With OpenVPN, you can always log in and fix something unexpected if that happens. While we're at it, build yourself one of these. And for extra credit, document the whole process with photos and videos and post it online for everyone to respect you in awe for being such a 1337 h4x0rz yourself. Heck, you might even be able to make a business out of selling a bunch of these. Hint: If you want to do that, stock up on a bunch of the same model display, because those change all the time and you can never buy the same exact thing (with same hardware attached) twice. If you attempt to go through one of those flatscreen stocking companies, the same display will cost you double and not come with the added hardware.

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
    1. Re:Home made thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      You need to get laid.

    2. Re:Home made thing. by Bromskloss · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, that would be nice (the adventurous option). Why the VPN, though? I have simple customs, I just tunnel over SSH when I need to encrypt a connection. What is it I am missing by not doing VPN?

      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    3. Re:Home made thing. by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

      I don't really know. I guess it boils down to personal preference. When I first used OpenVPN, it was so easy to configure and use (on Linux, BSD, Windows, and Mac) and gave such flexibility that it's the only thing I use now. It works over SSL. You see a tun or tap device that you can apply packet filtering rules to, so essentially it's like having a dedicated interface connecting you to the distant network. It does public-key encryption, certificate and shared key authentication, compression with LZO; you can make the two networks appear as one with a bridged configuration or as two networks connected by a router with a routed configuration. Yes, you get the same overall result (a tunnel) with SSH but OpenVPN is just so damn easy to set up and incredibly flexible. As I said, personal preference, I suppose.

      --
      McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
    4. Re:Home made thing. by devman · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm doggin on your OpenVPN solution, I like it. I just thought I'd point out that most Linux distro's come with OpenSSH installed and it can do tunneling right out of the box, there's nothing to it you don't configure anything on server (except maybe disabling password authentication, because if this is over the internet you are using PK Auth!) all the configuration is done on the client side, which is mondo easy in PuTTY.

    5. Re:Home made thing. by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      Do you seriously want to be known for inventing the telescreen? Orwell must be rolling in his grave right now.

    6. Re:Home made thing. by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

      Cool! Thanks for sharing that. Simpler solutions are often better than more complicated ones (though OpenVPN is ridiculously simple when it comes to connecting networks together). I'll give SSH a whirl sometime...

      --
      McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
    7. Re:Home made thing. by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

      I forgot to include step 10: Provide with the above unit a huge sledgehammer labeled "In event of imminent sexual congress, smash telescreen."

      --
      McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
    8. Re:Home made thing. by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Tunneling UDP (e.g. streaming video) in OpenSSH doesn't work right. If the outside tunnel drops a packet, everything backs up, which shouldn't happen. Use OpenVPN.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    9. Re:Home made thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is the parent offtopic? I don't even find it interesting, I find it redundant.

    10. Re:Home made thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or, use an iMac.

    11. Re:Home made thing. by slash.dt · · Score: 1
      If you're not very adventurous: Any computer. Any video conferencing software (such as Skype). VPN software (such as OpenVPN). VNC software (such as RealVNC). The best is if you get a computer where the screen and computer are in the same enclosure. You don't even hook up a keyboard or a rat. If something happens, you lgo on their desktop thru the VPN and VNC and click on Skype again or whatever.

      This is pretty close to what we do. We have a mac mini hooked up to my inlaw's TV with a webcam on top. Skype and VNCServer is running on the mac (skype since we have a PC at our end). Whenever we want to talk we can VNC to the mac and start the conversation. My wife does it all the time and also uses it to show the inlaws photos from webalbums.

      We also have a skype phone setup for those times that you just want to talk and can't be bother with the video link.

    12. Re:Home made thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're hired

  19. Hard videophone is the option by neutrino38 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We have bought a pair of Grandstream videophone. The are cheap and much easier to use than PC for older people as they are basically ... telephones.

    You can even setup Grandpa's one in auto-answer mode but I would not recommend it for obvious privacy issues as one of the comments above maliciously reminded.

    AH and to overcome NAT and dynamic IP address issues, you have to setup a hosted SIP proxy and media relay such as Asterisk. I cheat here as this the very business of my company.

    By the way if you want a pair of free SIP accounts and the Grandstream videophone, we could sell them to you.

    1. Re:Hard videophone is the option by drmofe · · Score: 1

      How much are you selling the free SIP accounts for?

    2. Re:Hard videophone is the option by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      You fail boolean logic, sir.

    3. Re:Hard videophone is the option by bozojoe · · Score: 1

      Why is there not more traffic on this posting?

      Asterisk is very flexible solution. A little whompy around the edges but manageable.

      Could we see a howto, or at least a writeup on your setup? Heck, I might even buy a that Grandstream (and the ""free"" SIP account, as FWD is pay now)

      --
      lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
  20. Imagine the trauma your kids will suffer... by BLAG-blast · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...when Gramps and Granny pass away live over the video link... oh dear! On the other hand it's good for children to learn about death at an early age.

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
    1. Re:Imagine the trauma your kids will suffer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...when Gramps and Granny pass away live over the video link

      Possible, but rather pessimistic. The opposite alternative is getting a call from the local sheriff, saying "Sorry, Sir. It looks like she fell and then couldn't crawl to the telephone..." That's not pretty either.

      You must be under 30 to believe that you can sanitize old age by ignoring it.

    2. Re:Imagine the trauma your kids will suffer... by iworm · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's something about the concept of "passing away live" that confuses me...

    3. Re:Imagine the trauma your kids will suffer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't seem like it should be a real concern. Gramps could die when he comes to visit; does that mean you shouldn't invite him for Christmas?

    4. Re:Imagine the trauma your kids will suffer... by blue+l0g1c · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gr4mp4_B3nny: I told u I was hardcore.

    5. Re:Imagine the trauma your kids will suffer... by Syrente · · Score: 1

      Think of it like an Amy Winehouse concert.

    6. Re:Imagine the trauma your kids will suffer... by seanellis · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is the UK. Grandma and Gramps are probably, what, 32? 33?

    7. Re:Imagine the trauma your kids will suffer... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      This is the UK. Grandma and Gramps are probably, what, 32? 33?

      Seriously, I don't want to come across as humourless or offended, because I'm more surprised than anything. I'm aware of the "bad teeth" and "everyone speaks with cut glass voices and has a butler and is frightfully repressed, yadda yadda" stereotypes the Americans have of the British, but are underage pregnancies seen as a British thing? New one on me!

      (Trying to figure out if you're over-extrapolating modern reports of "chavs" on council estates or thinking of some Victorian-era cliche...)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    8. Re:Imagine the trauma your kids will suffer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that's in Celsius. In Fahrenheit they'd be right around 90.

  21. "Unlimited Broadband" by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Umm haven't you heard? You only get that if you dont use it.

    Start doing 24/7 video and you will find your connection throttled, or gone.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:"Unlimited Broadband" by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Umm haven't you heard? You only get that if you dont use it.

      Kind of like a bank loan. You can only get one if you don't need it.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  22. Gold Plated? by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you can get gold plated machines for 5 grand, please fill me in as that is a real steal.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  23. Surveillance systems by yuna49 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are a variety of IP surveillance systems on the market designed for people who want to monitor their vacation homes, etc. Most of these are pretty inexpensive and easy to configure. That might be easier than building your own system using PCs.

    This company seems to offer a wide variety of solutions, some standalone, some PC based: www.fgeng.com

  24. I have a suggestion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why not just rename "Ask Slashdot" to "Someone Fucking Think For Me"?

    Seriously. Whatever happened to the days of "Hey, I wanted to do 'x', and so, here's how I did it - because I'm a nerd"?

    Whatever happened to the days when questions were prefaced with "I wanted to accomplish , and HERE is what I've done so far to do so - and here's the results of that - does anyone have any other ideas"?

    NOW DAYS, all the questions come in the form of "What's the best way to do it?" - which translates, basically, to: "Tell me how to do it".

    WTF?

    This is NOT "News for Nerd, Stuff That Matters".

    It's a sad commentary on the "state of the art" of supposed Nerds here, too true.

    And the editors.

    1. Re:I have a suggestion... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It's a sad commentary on the "state of the art" of supposed Nerds here, too true."

      Don't you have 100 tacos to buy and a Doctor Who marathon to watch?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:I have a suggestion... by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't you have 100 tacos to buy and a Doctor Who marathon to watch?

      Yes, but because I took the time to fucking think about it, the PVR in my PC is working just fine so I'll timeshift the Dr Who marathon a bit and take the time to reply to you. Anyway, the Tacos are on their way and it takes a while to stuff 100 of them into the delivery guy's car (so i hear).

      I agree with the parent's sentiment - what has happened to the nerd way of doing something because it needed to be done? Very few people want to think about their problems anymore.

      The powerful scientific pocket calculator was the start of all this hoo haa. Kids were dumbed down and started forgetting to do basic arithmetic (yes, there are many who can't work out how much change I get when the till is down and I've just ordered a hundred tacos).

      The Intarwebs has been the other downfall. People are only too happy to put "i want to do X" into Google and click pages. If no useful results come up they bitch and moan that there is no way to do X (maybe X is just something so menially boring that nobody documented it, or it's just dumb, or nobody ever thought of it yet) but these people don't care.

      What you're seeing people is the well-established decline in intelligence and determination which comes with the "google-it" culture.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    3. Re:I have a suggestion... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      What you're seeing people is the well-established decline in intelligence and determination which comes with the "google-it" culture.

      What I'm seeing that the nerd crowd hasn't shrunk, their tasks have just become more mainstream. Not everybody in the world shares your passion to dig as deep into blinkie things as possible. The world isn't falling apart, it just got bigger and you didn't notice.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:I have a suggestion... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      First off Tacos of the quantity are served by wheel barrel.

      Secondly, If you use a DVR, you will be watching a delayed version, which as anyone with a modicum of intelligence would know, you won't be first to post your opinion on the quality of the show.

      No, the pocket calculator, and the internet have meant more time to do original stuff, not waste our time reinventing the wheel.

      I'm sure there was some old, cranky, white bearded fellow spewing the same nonsense at Gutenberg.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:I have a suggestion... by crossmr · · Score: 3, Funny

      I bet you have an automatic machine that chases whipper-snappers off your lawn.

    6. Re:I have a suggestion... by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      I bet you have an automatic machine that chases whipper-snappers off your lawn

      Why bother? They're all inside on the Intarwebs forgetting how to do actual things like socialise and play on my lawn.

      $GOD forbid that they learn a skill like electronics, computers, whatever.

      To all the other people that decided that I was some grey-haired grandpa: I'm actually a lot younger than you think.

      I just think that this "information whenever you want it" crowd have lost sight of the real issue at hand: how to actually think for long enough to create new information.

      It's all well and good to say that everyone is out there not reinventing the wheel because they can just look up how to do it, but the old teach a man to fish analogy applies here. Teach a man to always "google-it" and a man will always google it, no matter how trivial it is. That man will never learn to think and solve NEW problems for himself.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    7. Re:I have a suggestion... by VoidCrow · · Score: 1

      I blame the tedious permanence of the self-righteous old fart culture. You people were exercising your rights to display randomised senile expression fail, spitting on your audience and waving a cane around at da yoof, since at least Roman times.

      1. Boring.
      2. Fail.
      3. So, I herd u leik mudkipz?

    8. Re:I have a suggestion... by Syrente · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair he's just asking how to do it properly - better to ask fellow Nerds on here than to try it yourself with the crap peddled out at local stores or online stores (where the quality of an item is not tied to its price, to an extent). Shortly after you get it home and open the box you find the shiny webcam they were advertising is actually surprisingly similar to the kids' toys you find in special edition cereals. It's around this point you think, "Shit, I should've looked online."

      But surprise, surprise, all there is online is one guy's website outlining some bastard expensive $1500 set-up that has bells, whistles and a megaton of fireworks which has only the vaguest descriptions of how he managed to obtain said wonder-items and how he subsequently soldered them all together. Honestly "Google It" doesn't even work all of the time because it just links to 100 different people having slightly different problems but getting no offer of help from their respective forums/help websites. This is where the concept of community is a bit of a hit-or-miss. Slashdot, as a community, is generally expected to hit. Hence, people ask. People don't always know the answer and it's not like there's a book called "Setting up a 24/7 Webcam in the United Kingdom without Shite Quality or Being Fucked Over by ISP Bills, for Dummies" readily available...

    9. Re:I have a suggestion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wheelbarrow .

      Hope this helps.

  25. msn.com :free and worked fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    msn.com: free, worked great (better than yahoo) used with logmein.com to control their machine. Single cam to Single Cam.

  26. Simple by hax0r_this · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't see why everyone is recommending complicated video conferencing setups. Just set up apache on each end to stream from your webcam and use iptables to block connections from any IP except the one on the other end. If you don't have static IPs write a little script to update iptables on the other end every time the local IP changes. Then use dyndns so you never lose track of the other end (only apply the whitelist on the streaming port so ssh doesn't get blocked. Then use ssh keys). Then all you have to do is point firefox to their dyndns address/port.

    1. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you being sarcastic?

    2. Re:Simple by simpleblob · · Score: 1

      Yes, very simple indeed....

  27. Gee grandpa must be really tired....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he hasn't moved in days.

  28. Sip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might try IP phones with video support. I'm not sure if you'd need a server in between, but you can build one of those using a free disto such as PBX in a Flash or Trixbox.

  29. +1 for iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do this with my wife between South America and the US when I'm away working.

    We got a 20" iMac for the kitchen. For the first week it felt invasive, but hearing 'Honey, where did you hide the zester?' grows on you. It makes being on the road much more tolerable.

    The bonus is being able to watch movies/TV (we got an eyetv), lookup recipes, make grocery lists, etc.

    1. Re:+1 for iChat by fucket · · Score: 1

      What's a zester?

    2. Re:+1 for iChat by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Zester is a grater. Cheese, chocolate, etc..

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re:+1 for iChat by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Zester is a grater. Cheese, chocolate, etc..

      That too... but I thought the primary purpose of a zester was to, well, get the zest off citrus fruits.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  30. Simple solution... by kage.j · · Score: 1

    LAN Camera + Hamachi on both sides!

    --
    he demonstrated by A plus B minus C divided by Z that the sheep must be red, and die of the rot
  31. Axis by rindeee · · Score: 1

    Pretty much pick any Axis IP camera and you're golden. I've had Axis video links up for months at a time, no problem. Even broadband outages don't matter as the feed will reconnect if you use decent software (standard video stream, use software of your choice).

  32. Yeah, right. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    and we can now get pretty cheap nearly unlimited broadband connections at this end (UK).

    Sure you can. We have had "unlimited" connections here in the States for some time now (snicker snicker.)

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  33. Ojo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is also one of those Ojo videophones they have on NCIS.

  34. Hardware Options by WebManWalking · · Score: 2, Informative

    You made no mention of what your hardware was, nor even whether or not you had a video camera.

    A few years ago, I bought some DLink webcams to set up a custom home video surveillance system, with remote monitoring from work. I believe that the model number was DCS-5300. But since they're mounted on-high, I'd rather not climb up on a ladder to find out for sure.

    For bandwidth and security reasons, I chose to get the 10/100Base-T versions, not wireless. The wired versions were also cheaper. You're going to have to run power cords to the wherever you mount them anyway, so why not an Ethernet wires at the same time?

    They're designed to be always on (for home surveillance), as you indicated you wanted, 24/7. I don't even remember if they have an on/off switch. They draw considerably less power than a computer and webcam combination.

    They came with their own Web server and have their own IP addresses on my home LAN. Of course, they're configurable with a Web page interface.

    You wanted using the system to be a no-brainer, presumably to help out your less-than-techno-savvy kids and parents. You can't get any more simple than these webcams. You just browse to them with any Web browser. You can set the browsers up with Bookmarks/Favorites to make getting there simple.

    The cams serve up a Web page with the camera feed on it. If you've configured them for permission to control the camera, the page will also have controls to pan, tilt and zoom.

    If you use a broadband router as a firewall, you'll have to configure the router to expose the cam's server port to the Internet. If you're concerned about the security of doing that, note that the Web server software resides on a chip. It doesn't have a disk drive. It isn't even big enough to contain a disk drive. It's as secure as the Web server that comes built into most broadband routers these days.

    As I said, I bought them years ago. There are bound to be other brands by now besides DLink that do the same things, if you want to shop around.

    1. Re:Hardware Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      audio?

  35. Nice... by Dramacrat · · Score: 0

    Live n00d grandmother's ready to frog 24/7!!!!!!! Sign up now!!!!!!!!

    --
    There are over 36 million lines of COBOL code in the world, and they are all raping children.
  36. Open source in any case by JackassJedi · · Score: 1

    It probably has been said before, but i'd use open source software in any case; you can probably even if you don't know the toolkit used in detail, adapt the program so that it e.g. reconnects when disconnected, and maybe simplify the user interface.

    --
    Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many.
  37. The easiest way I can think of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Go back in time 24 years
    2) Fill out name changes for you and your grandparents. Your new name is Charrington and their new names are Winston and Julia.
    3) ???
    4) PROFIT!!!

  38. Custom solution by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

    We use something that might fit your need - its an offshoot of the CCTV business, and it goes over the wire.

    Basically, its a little black box, which takes a couple of coax inputs and sends the resulting video to any clients connected via TCP/IP. It works over the internet (even over NAT, you just have to forward the right port), has a Windows client and is fairly cheap. One box each end, one client each end and you are done.

    The company we buy from is Vista, the boxes are various models of the SmartTel range but we mainly use the VLS-04TR. Norbain are their UK distributor.

    http://www.vista-cctv.com/products/cat:SmartTel_-_Transmit_Only/catID:P47B5F3A42CC83/

    Knock yourself out.

  39. iRobot has it too (but do not sell yet). by snikulin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    iRobot has a very nice device ConnectR.
    Apparently they do not sell it just yet. And yes, I would be careful buying it because my mom could be very... um... advisable?

  40. Skype and 1 click VNC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skype, together with '1 click VNC' (a.k.a quadruple click VNV) and you are on your way. They don't need to press the buttons if you can do it for them.

  41. my 0.013547382 Euros by Cheza · · Score: 1

    I used to develop for software company that provides something pretty close. They have to clients CR and CG and the CG has pretty much complete video controls over the other side, mic and speaker volume, echo cancellation so the grandparents have to have no computer experience at all, since all controls including starting and ending the call rely on the CG. So if you are looking for a non-free solution http://www.caregivertech.com/ is a very nice solution, (they also have medical history and things like that in there client)

  42. Cisco Telepresence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do it the right way: Cisco Telepresence. Buy yourself a 20 Mbps circuit from the local telco, do the same with the grand parents. Each system is only 300,000 - but I bet you can get a discount if you do a press release. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps8333/index.html You didn't specify cost as a problem. Do it right!

  43. iChat is the best by jordandeamattson · · Score: 3, Informative

    Several have already said it, but I had to endorse iChat.

    I have 7x24 video conferencing up and running with a remote test team in India. The idea is that it is muted unless one or the other side wants to say something.

    We tried both Skype Video (another frequently mentioned option) and iChat. We are staying with iChat due to the simplicity, robustness, and quality.

    With Skype we had the connection drop multiple times in a night. With iChat it runs and runs and runs.

    With Skype, we had significant video and audio artifacts all of the time. With iChat they are infrequent occurrences.

    For Skype I had to write up an instruction guide. With iChat folks just got it.

    So, I say go with iChat.

    1. Re:iChat is the best by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Is there an iChat for Windows, Linux?

    2. Re:iChat is the best by jordandeamattson · · Score: 1

      No.

      This is one of the competitive advantages that Apple has.

      I honestly believe that some of the quality of iChat is due to the integration of the Apple stack.

      Jordan

    3. Re:iChat is the best by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Well, I think it sucks and how anyone can call this a competitive advantage escapes me. Imagine if Nokia phone owners could only talk to other Nokia phone users.

      X.

    4. Re:iChat is the best by j-beda · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure that iChat is just a branded version of AOL's AIM, and AIM client on any other platform should be fine for talking to an iChat client on a Mac.

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. 24/7? Nofreakingway by DynaSoar · · Score: 4, Funny

    On behalf of my fellow elderlies (I'm only honorary, at 53, but I'm in training), you do not want a 24/7 link. It needs to have a call siggnal and an on/off switch. You, and we, do not need to deal with your trauma of seeing grandpa bending grandma over the sink for a sneak-up quickie.

    Don't think we don't. You don't want to think about it at all, so consider the reasons why you don't want to.

    If you want a global on switch, fine. Let us have an override off switch. Put an hour delay cut-off on it if you like. We're old, it takes us more than the 10 minutes you kids take. (Just wait until you get to enjoy that aspect). And we're gladly admit that an hour is plenty, and we should be looked in on after that. Especially if we spend the whole hour.

    On the other hand, I've heard said "We wouldn't even bother to do it anymore, but the kids like to watch." If your elders have that mindset, go ahead and give them the means to offer you instruction 24/7. You don't think they haven't learned a few novel tricks in 40 or so years?

    Got a problem with this? Get over yourself. You're halfway to this age yourself, and I'm betting when you get there you'll have no plans on stopping.

    Go ahead and mod this funny, since you don't have a "+1 elders' wisdom" mod.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:24/7? Nofreakingway by geekoid · · Score: 1

      To be fair, we also don't have a "-1 elders" creepy mod either.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:24/7? Nofreakingway by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

      To be fair, we also don't have a "-1 elders" creepy mod either.

      Hang on to that thought, son. For about 40 years. The decide whether the piece you're getting is worth +1 or -1.

      "We are only immortal for a limited time." And yours is coming soon enough.

      --
      "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  46. Ekiga? by Jorophose · · Score: 1

    Ekiga supports video now, doesn't it? Should be as easy as customising a light WM to only run it, or if you want this as a normal desktop too just use Xfce designed to be more user-friendly (use your judgement for what's user-friendly) and run Ekiga constantly.

    Much better than skype. Bonus points if you can encrypt the signal.

  47. http://www.tokbox.com by atrimtab · · Score: 1

    Instant two way video conferencing with multiple parties *if* needed.

    Just create the accounts and bookmark the user unique URLs for each end of the conservation.

    Tokbox also works with any web browser that utilize Flash 9, so it runs on Windows, Mac and Linux.

    http://www.tokbox.com/

    --
    Facebook is billions of individual "Skinner Boxes." And if you use it you are the pigeon!
  48. Skype and some construction. by crhylove · · Score: 1

    I recommend two mid-grade logitech webcams, and a projector on either end. Install the webcam in the middle of a large blank white wall, with the USB cable exiting the wall in a distant corner to connect to the machine. Then project your screen fullscreen directly on the same wall.

    If you use the entire wall, and get a good enough connection (I often do in Skype), you will have a wall that opens up virtually to another house with the identical setup.

    Setting this up for a full time connection with a cheap extra PC is a no-brainer. I recommend MicroXP, since it is fast, stable, and has all the additional BS removed. I seem to get better skype performance under windows than under Linux.

    In this way, your home can be connected to another home with the illusion of presence in a way that is natural to the human mind.

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    1. Re:Skype and some construction. by crhylove · · Score: 1

      It is essential that your webcam only have the lens visible in the the wall, to complete the illusion. Be sure to smooth and Spackle the rest of the wall around your webcam installation to a solid smooth, uniform white.

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    2. Re:Skype and some construction. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I don't know that many kitchens with that much wall space actually.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  49. No "buttons" at all! by StCredZero · · Score: 1

    Use Skype with a script. You should be able to set up something where you can enable this entirely from your end!

  50. Have you tried TokBox? by SirCrashALot · · Score: 1

    I'm an engineer at tokbox.com, and we aim to be super simple video chat. It's all in flash, which is often pre-installed. Flash supports most webcams and all browsers.

    You can set up an account for yourself, and then give your parents a url tokbox.com/, which you can set as their default home page. Then there is an AIR based client if you want to leave running all the time on your end.

  51. I hate to sound cynical, but: by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You likely won't get away with the bandwidth you'll use doing this -- especially if it's Comcast. Inside the first month, they'll be all up in your business, threatening to shut you down, etc. because you dare to use the bandwidth you're paying for. I don't imagine it's going to be any better with any other ISP either, unless you buy business-class service, in which case they have less of a right to "manage" the bandwidth you're paying (way too much) for. A better idea would be to have a video link-on-demand instead of 24/7; sorry, pal. :-/

    1. Re:I hate to sound cynical, but: by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Market hype. Unlimibytes don't exist. To pay for unlimited bytes would be cost ineffective. The bastards get away with it by maintaining a burst speed mentality and a 'fuck you' clause where they can kick you out for using more than their definition of a fair amount of resources.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  52. Do you really want this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you imagine the trauma of your kids (or you) walking into the kitchen to see grannie and grampa going at it across the kitchen table thinking that because they turned off the tv nobody can see them.

    Seriously though I could see it being quite intrusive, even if it could easily be turned off and on.

  53. try skype by eagl · · Score: 1

    Try skype. It's really easy.

  54. ichat av by jpellino · · Score: 1

    make automator do the rest
    a custom big red button icon for the automator script
    whose alias is in the startup items

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  55. Up by Kamineko · · Score: 1

    >and we can now get pretty cheap nearly unlimited broadband connections at this end (UK). Not upstream you can't.

  56. the best tool for fighting for privacy with by alizard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a 24/7 video link is your hat. Take it . . . and drop it over the camera when you're doing anything you don't want the viewer to see.

    1. Re:the best tool for fighting for privacy with by Loibisch · · Score: 2

      That doesn't solve the audible problem.

  57. Yeah, whatever grandpa by amake · · Score: 1

    People have bemoaned the "decline in culture" of the young people for centuries. It's bullshit. Life goes on, just in ways different from when you were growing up. I know that's scary, but you can either get used to it or you can turn into a crotchety old bastard that no one likes.

    Re: The "Google-it" culture. That's simply the democratization of access to information. The percentage of the population that has the interest and ability to create original solutions probably hasn't changed (or perhaps has increased but the signal is lost among the noise).

  58. Re:In the us unlimited broadband may be going away by Provocateur · · Score: 4, Funny

    Considering the depths this thread has gone to, did you misspell streaming on purpose?

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  59. iChat Screen Sharing by reshin · · Score: 1

    You can also access Leopard's screen sharing feature from within iChat, if you ever have the need to tweak their computer after it's been set up. I use it to help Mom when solitaire crashes.
    http://www.peachpit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1160240&seqNum=5

  60. WiFi or Ethernet Webcams... by TavisJohn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are self contained WiFi and Ethernet webcams (Most have a mini web server built in). That, a router and a Dynamic IP Name Service ( http://www.dyndns.org/ ) will finish off the bill. Many routers have built in support for some Dynamic IP Name Services. You set the router to forward Port 80 (Or whatever port the webcam ues) to the IP address of the webcam. Then you just point the computer at the URL and you are seeing still images or streaming video. Most Webcams even support a password system so only those who you want to have access will. No dedicated computer, software, or anything like that.

  61. If you can spend some cash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get a state of the art high definition (720p30) video conferencing system for $5000 per end from LifeSize Communications (www.lifesize.com). You would need to add a flat panel to that and give it 1Mb/s in both directions but you get a push button interface and the experience is nearly like looking through a window. It is very easy to suspend disbelief and forget there is anything between you.

    If you can't spend that much, then the next best thing is an iMac running iChat. It beats the pants off any pc/skype combination for usability and quality.

    Full disclosure - I'm an engineer for LifeSize.

  62. tablet PC + cam by crossmr · · Score: 1

    I've always toyed with the idea of a tablet PC ( as it has some touch features) and the possibility of wall mounting it with a camera(s). In Linux it should be fairly simple to make a pretty dumb interface that would have very simple choices like "Camera on/Camera off", "Call Kids", etc The other choice is a throw away laptop wall mounted in to a larger flat screen (but you lose the touch ability and have to come up with another interface, maybe a custom keyboard attachment with some basic buttons labeled as above. if you can run ethernet to it, it should be easy for you to troubleshoot it/maintain it if there is ever a problem. One key thing might be a camera that can move. The grandparents might not always want to be directly in front of it in the kitchen. Add tracking software and/or the ability for your to re-point the camera.
    Just remember in this kind of case you get what you pay for.

  63. Re:In the us unlimited broadband may be going away by MrNaz · · Score: 1

    He's talking about a video link, so "steaming" surely is the word he's looking for.

    --
    I hate printers.
  64. Re:Pay through the nose but get a working system.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree.. a set-top box is gonna be your best bet if you never want to troubleshoot it. You can look into Polycom, BrightCom, Tandberg, LifeSize... they all have "cheaper" solutions now.

    As for your end, you don't need a crazy setup. Especially if you're more tech savy. You can just use Ekiga (it's SIP compatible and will work with these systems)

    Regardless of which solution you go with, you should look int MPLS or some type of Quality of Service from your ISP so that you conversation with Granny isn't interrupted by something like an email download or a music stream.

    oh one more thing.. echo cancelling. you'll probably have a horrible time dealing with echo or non-full duplex issues if you go with any of the software-only solutions.

  65. Packet8 Video Phone by aolsheepdog · · Score: 1

    Packet8 has had standalone video units for at least the last 4 years that I recall. I seem to recall that they were 'featured' on one of the seasons of 24.

    It's VOIP so works just like a phone but with full motion video. Seems pretty grandparent proof. Broadband required.
    Video Phone

  66. Re:In the us unlimited broadband may be going away by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

    In the us unlimited broadband may be going away and isp's like comcarp do don like steaming video.

    Please. In the 80s it was going to cost extra for a modem to use a phone line. Now it's "oh noes, broadband isn't going to be unlimited anymore!".

    The Internet here is not an extension of the government or a communist party. They are independent companies who will advertise "unlimited" services as they wish, unless something happens to disrupt the model. That hasn't happened, only Internet speculation has happened.

  67. A somewhat related question - higher resolution? by mbourgon · · Score: 1

    Question: does anyone do higher-resolution videoconferencing than 320x240? iChat does (640x480, I believe), but for better or worse I'm on a PC, and Skype's hi-def videoconf requires a whole litany of prerequisites - dual-core processor, specific Logitech cameras, etc, etc. I bought a Philips webcame that can do 640x480, 90fps, but nothing that can come even close to that. I certainly don't need 90fps, but 640x480 would be much nicer than 320x240. (I say that - is that even the case? Would lower-resolution but higher FPS feel more "there"?)

    So - is there any software that I'm missing? Many thanks.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  68. VLVC by atarione · · Score: 3, Informative

    seems like a easy and free / multi platform and open source solution is the VLVC plugin for VLC

    http://www.vlvc.net/en-home.html

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
  69. SightSpeed by dannyastro · · Score: 1

    SightSpeed http://sightspeed.com/ has the best video quality, it's free, multi-platform, and can run it 24 hours/day. You can also set it for relatively low bandwidth (250~350 kbps) so you don't slow down other things and the quality is still very good.

  70. Re:Skype and eBay by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1
    If I remember correctly, skype was purchased by eBay a year or so ago. I don 't have any illusions about where eBay stands on privacy and degrees of evilness. Intel's new processor chip will have hardware support for the 128-bit encryption AES. Now that would be technology for building secure communications (except for the NSA).

    How does this scenario grab you? You use your skype, and the next time you sign onto eBay, they try and sell you things based on words they heard during your phone calls.

  71. Re: Japan has been there for a long time by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 2, Informative
    In 1974 I was stationed in Japan and they had a midnight TV show from the public baths where you got to see breasts.

    The Japanese have had porn for a while, but they are clever about it. For instance they have porn magazine vending machines on the street, but a cover comes down over the magazines till after 8PM, then you can see what you would be buying. They also have beer vending machines. In some ways they are very advanced.

  72. iChat has AUTO ANSWER! by MrHatken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just to second the suggestion for iChat and point out that iChat has a (command-line enabled) AUTO ANSWER facility. So when you ring your GrandParents they don't even need to click to answer.

    I don't find the iChat "Chat Request" panel to be that intuitive (for GrandParents). It just displays a pane with the request annoucement but no buttons. You need to click on the panel to make it expand to show the accept/reject buttons.

    Auto-Answer can also help if GrandParents aren't computer literate or have trouble seeing the small on-screen pointer.

    Of course, most people don't like the invasion of privacy that this allows but then if you are thinking of video-chatting 24x7 this should not really be a problem.

    Google for how to do it ...

    Cheers,
    Ashley.

  73. We don't need video, Life Call was good enough by scourfish · · Score: 1

    Mrs. Fletcher uses an audio link only system, and it works exactly as promised. The minute she used hers and said "I've fallen and I can't get up" people knew it was as reliable as anyone would ever need.

  74. Re:well if money is no option by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I looked at your UID before posting...

    Err...

    If sanity is your option then, c'mon... These are in-laws to one of them. No one, and I mean no one on the whole planet, really wants to live with their in-laws.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  75. Mebeam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try www.mebeam.com . You can have up to 8 people in a room with full video and audio. Free.

  76. Rule #34 by VoidCrow · · Score: 1

    Of course there is.

  77. Re:A somewhat related question - higher resolution by raynet · · Score: 1

    Skype does allow 640x480 video on any camera that supports that resolution, you just need to force the resolution in config.xml for Skype to use it. Works great on my Mac and PC.

    --
    - Raynet --> .
  78. Asus EeePc by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    taped to the wall with Skype on auto-answer.

    You'd probably get away with a 701 but a 901 has better power management.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  79. Re:In the us unlimited broadband may be going away by Syrente · · Score: 1

    Thanks to QoS I sometimes find video streaming is certainly a steaming something...

  80. 24/7 ? by webnut77 · · Score: 1

    24/7? Even if you were allowed to do it, it doesn't mean you should do it. Just think if this guy, plus a few million others, start streaming video of their empty kitchens to each other. Comcast et. al. are already screaming "We have to manage our congestion" so let's all squander our connections to prove them right.

  81. try www.tokbox.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try www.tokbox.com

    Works pretty nice!

  82. Caregiver Technologies by fatmonkeyboy · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a company called Caregiver Technologies. We specialized in videoconferencing systems for people with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers.

    Unlike some of the suggestions you're getting here, this system was designed to be completely unmanned and as low maintenance as possible on the "care receiver" side.

    They are based in the US but that shouldn't be an issue if you're willing to handle setting up the hardware yourself.

    Here's their website:
    http://www.caregivertech.com

  83. Why dont you invite your granparents 2 stay with U by qwan · · Score: 1

    I think that would be better for everybody. Your kids would have a human touch. Grandparents have a good influence on kids(unless they are senile and demented). Especially when you have one of wise grandparents you see in movies.

  84. Re:In the us unlimited broadband may be going away by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

    Depends on how far away grandma and grampa's house is, and if they'll be using the same ISP. It's entirely possible all the traffic will be staying in the ISP's network.

  85. TANDBERG 1700MXP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Invest in TANDBERG 1700MXPs.

    http://www.tandberg.com/products/telepresence/tandberg_1700_mxp.jsp

  86. This scares the crap out of me. by kabocox · · Score: 1

    I'm never worried by being spied upon by the government. I feel that they already know everything that the could ever really care to know about me. Who do I really fear spying on me?

    Mom and the mother-in-law. Heck, my mom lives 15 minutes away across town and talks to my wife at least twice a day and I figure that's too much spying on my family's life. The mother-in-law lives 2 hours away and calls the wife maybe 3-4 times a week. What nut case would want to allow two way video access for their parents to see and comment how they are raising their kids? I mean come on the government is at least somewhat reasonable in where they pick to interfere in our daily lives. The parents can get on their soap boxes about the most crazy things and you can't just disconnect them... you'd never hear the end of it. I've read about a tons of different ways this could nearly trivially be setup.

    I'm scared that I've yet to read a single post that says it might not be a very good idea except for the comments about watching the grandparents do things when they thought that they weren't observed. I mean come on how many of you live a distance away from your parents just so you won't have them visiting? I mean doesn't this defeat the entire purpose of living a distance away from your parents/inlaws?

  87. OLPC by logfish · · Score: 1
    Twist the screens on two OLPC computers and hang them in the kitchen. They have full-screen chat systems and should allow you to have a 24/7 connection with limited power supply, a display in the unit and not two much "work" (no hardware hacking or screwing in a webcam anywhere).

    It may also be nice to do a build-your-own system with linutop machines and multiple network camera's setting up a VPN to share them all. Don't forget to look for an option you will have the most fun with, because the users are always going to complain about something (quality, power usage, privacy, how to shut it off, how to restart it... etc. etc.)

  88. How about Nokia internet tablet by dap · · Score: 1

    Nokia Internet Tablet (previously N800, now N810) is a small handheld device with video call capability. It is a linux-based device with touchscreen, video camera.

    The video chat on it is based on Google Talk (you can IM to other Google talk users, and video call with N800/N810 users.)

    It connects to the internet via WiFi or connect via bluetooth to mobile phone.

    The main screen is customizable, you can have "quick contact" on main screen to see their online status, and make call from there.

    Video can be set on/off during a call.

    The downside would be its small size, the screen is small and audio might not be loud enough for your kitchen, and video is not very high quality.

    1. Re:How about Nokia internet tablet by lovesignal · · Score: 1

      2nd that. These are GREAT devices.

  89. VLC? by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

    When my girlfriend did a semester on the other coast, we used VLC over SSH. There is a little lag, but you can cut it down by playing with the caching, etc. (Not only did we get encryption but used SSH port tunneling to bypass the NAT, firewall problems with her school's network).

    If you didn't need to encrypt it or have a need for tunneling, you could drop SSH, you could make a batch file for them to start it up easy enough.

    --

    -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
  90. PS3+eyetoy+tv+broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PS3 makes for a great video chat system plus they can use the built in browser to send email from gmail/yahoo and watch movies from the comfort of the living room (DVDs and Blu-ray). Really nice.
    Total cost (without the TV) is $450 (when you add a bluetooth keyboard and bluetooth handsfree earphones)

  91. Already Asked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/02/052255

    This question gets asked quite a lot on here.

  92. Re:Skype and eBay by RincewindTVD · · Score: 1

    Yeah right, where am I going to buy a "kill the president"?

  93. Re:Skype and eBay by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    Are you talking about the forbidden game? The one that got loose on the Internet?

  94. Leaving notes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you have this set up it would be a trifle to put another monitor up in front of your local cam and set up a motion sensor.

    Once someone on the other end walks in front of thei camera it shows on your screen and triggers your video file to play for them.

    Hey all... wanted to let you know I wouldn't be on stage today... we're headed to blah blah blah blah blah

    LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

  95. Don't do it by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    They'll see me shagging your daughter on the kitchen table!

  96. Not cheap but... by NateTech · · Score: 1

    Polycom unit, you set up the port-forwarding and hook it to a TV for 'em. Better quality and ease of use (remote control and a speed dial you set up) than any webcam-based solution.

    --
    +++OK ATH
  97. GREAT Idea (with a twist).... by rickshaf · · Score: 1

    Well, technology aside, I think this is a great idea! Think of it: Grannie and Gramps can get their fill of their grandkids without ever having to say "So, d'ya want me to change that or should we let it ripen a bit more?" I do note, however, that there's likely a "situation-comedy" hiding in the weeds! For those of you in the UK, a "situation-comedy" is what you folks call a "drawing-room-comedy". (And, yes, American TV tends to steal all your best examples of same.)