Slashdot Mirror


Black Screens For Unauthorized Copies of Windows

arcticstoat writes "In a bid to deter people from using pirate versions of Windows XP, Microsoft is now updating its Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) tool to introduce a few uncomfortable niggles for users of pirated versions of Windows. These include replacing the desktop wallpaper with a black screen every 60 minutes, although you can still replace it with your wallpaper of choice in the intervening period. As well as this, copies of Windows deemed to not be genuine will also have a translucent watermark above the system tray, which Microsoft calls a 'persistent desktop notification.'"

143 of 762 comments (clear)

  1. Black? Niggles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too close for comfort.

  2. Notifications by Brad1138 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some one I know just doesn't download the the WGA notification (tells it never to download when it shows up in system updates) I... I mean he wants to know if that will still work?

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've wondered that too. Two of my PCs are currently using the same key. My install CDs & license keys are buried under dozens of boxes & books and I couldn't be bothered to spend 5 hours hunting for them just because XP needed a reinstall to get rid of the 120sec boot times and constant crashes.

      If not, you can use http://www.wallpaperchanger.de/ to change your wallpaper every hour and the text is hardly going to show if you leave a few icons over it.

    2. Re:Notifications by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whoever is on Slashdot right now with WGA installed(pirated copy or not) should bash their head into their monitor until their vision is nothing but a black screen.

      On a kinda related note, what's up with that fancy translucent notification? Looks like more thoughtful design went into it than into the whole UI of XP itself(which is actually highly configurable with transparent windows menus etc -- google it -- but why the hell did microsoft keep such a flexible UI so locked down with that lame Blue and Green for so long?).

    3. Re:Notifications by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whoever is on Slashdot right now with WGA installed(pirated copy or not) should bash their head into their monitor until their vision is nothing but a black screen.

      k. Ow...

      why the hell did microsoft keep such a flexible UI so locked down with that lame Blue and Green for so long?

      What the heck is so bad about it? I've never understood this, someone please enlighten me.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    4. Re:Notifications by nbert · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From the very beginning of WGA the aim was to discourage those who don't know how to avoid it to buy a proper copy. MS has conflicting interests, which both aim at profit: Market share* and a low number of illegal copies. If they make it too hard to install a pirate copy they might encourage people to switch to free alternatives. Plus they have to sell Vista now, which gives a perfect opportunity to make it a little more annoying to run a pirate copy of XP.
      I'd hate to give them just a cent for all the MS-related problems I had during the last years, but the good news is that many people switching to Vista can now sell their OEM licenses for XP (depending on what country they live in) and there is also a very huge chance to obtain a volume-license-key in my area. I'll legalize my copy in the near future, but not because I have to, but it has become so cheap. So the one time in a month I really want to play a decent computer game I don't have to worry about such things anymore.

      *Market share usually means turnover, but in this case I'd argue that % of people using it is a far better number. Major competitors offer their OS for free or sell it along their hardware for a price which is rather abritrary. Software is a very special industry. It's not like the car industry, where fixed and variable costs have a relation...

    5. Re:Notifications by Sj0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Same here. I've got probably 3-4 proper, honest Windows XP licenses, but I keep on having to find new ones because the key either gets lost or decides it doesn't want to work anymore because Microsoft thinks I'm a thief.

      XP is the end of the line for me, because of these shenanegans. I've got an ubuntu CD ready for the day I just give up on Microsoft and their customer hating practices.

      Seriously, consider this. When I pirate, I've never been kept out of a product I steal. Never. Not once. However, I've lost thousands of dollars in software to stupid copy protection schemes as a legitimate customer. They are disincentivizing ownership. I'm acually better off stealing than paying for it.

      These idiots need a clue, and fast.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    6. Re:Notifications by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seriously, consider this. When I pirate, I've never been kept out of a product I steal. Never. Not once. However, I've lost thousands of dollars in software to stupid copy protection schemes as a legitimate customer. They are disincentivizing ownership. I'm acually better off stealing than paying for it.

      I'm honestly do not mean to troll or flamebait, but it seems there's some Ayn Randian lesson there about the trouble with ruling honest people.

      Some regimes require criminals. If there aren't enough, they keep making laws until there are.

    7. Re:Notifications by Aetuneo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As I recall, Microsoft has the ability to force updates (which are downloaded in the background without telling the user). So, not downloading the WGA notifications will only work until MS realizes that users are able to do so.

      --
      Everything is subjective.
    8. Re:Notifications by mollymoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason I never used the XP theme (I stuck with the Win2k look while I still used Windows enough to care) is that the window chrome is huge. I don't give a stuff about looks, but I do give a stuff about my screen real-estate being eaten up by "cute" windows. It's not as bad as huge transparent chrome, but it's bad enough.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    9. Re:Notifications by Kneo24 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's the annoying factor. No one really wants to deal with someone over the phone for something as stupid and simple as a license key because the one they had decided to stop working for an arbitrary reason.

    10. Re:Notifications by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They can certainly update the updater if it is set to check for updates but not install them until prompted. They could probablly use that mechanism to force updates to other stuff too.

      I don't think they can force updates if automatic updates are completely turned off.

      But while they probablly could force down windows genunine advantage by a number of mechanisms (use the system for updating the updater, hide it in with another update) I doubt they will. MS has a tightrope to walk, on the one hand they want to drive people from pirate MS software to legit MS software. On the other hand they don't want to drive people to non-MS software.

      Besides MS has known for ages that users can refuse WGA, it even makes descisions about what updates to give them if they do refuse it. If they wanted to play hardball I would expect them to have done so by now.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    11. Re:Notifications by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      5 Minutes? Discounting Holds and such, it takes damn near 5 minutes to type in the number they give you.

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    12. Re:Notifications by rkanodia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point is, the net effect of this crap is to treat paying customers WORSE than pirates.

    13. Re:Notifications by Starayo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not quite the same thing, but I've been using a pirated copy of XP ever since, after some hardware upgrades, it refused to let me reactivate (citing I had used all my reactivations... I had never reactivated before? Yes, it was a new, genuine copy.) and forced me to ring customer service.

      Of course, this sent me to a call centre in india where I was told the "servers were down" and they were unable to help me at that time. It took me literally 5 minutes, the same time I spent waiting for them to pick up, to download and burn a new copy that had SP2 and updates slipstreamed into it that required no activation, and not once since then have I had a single problem.

      Meanwhile, I hear stories from my friends who are getting false positives on their assorted XP and Vista installs, the majority being OEM copies on dells...

      When this sort of protection is causing more of a hassle for legitimate customers rather than pirates, there is a serious problem. I highly doubt this new update to WGA will affect my install in any way, shape or form.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    14. Re:Notifications by jm4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wholeheartedly agree that much of the copy protection methods out there are disincentivizing ownership, but as far as copy protection goes what Microsoft is doing here is pretty passive. They're not locking anybody out of anything. These are only a couple visual reminders that you're not using a legitimate copy. In fact, to me it seems like kind of an improvement over their typical shitty behavior towards customers. With all the hell people have raised over product activation, WGA, etc. I shudder to even think of what would happen if they used the type of DRM we see on video games. These guys routinely put in rootkits and stuff that will disable or damage hardware. These guys sell products that routinely lock out paying customers. Game developers were always terrible about this. Remember when we had to turn to page 93 in the manual and type in the fourth word of the twelfth sentence in order to get the game to start up? Why is it we basically give these assholes a free pass while jump all over Microsoft for having comparitively friendly copy protection? I think any copy protection sucks, but any meaningful argument against it is going to gain a lot more traction if we go after the worst offenders.

    15. Re:Notifications by KillerBob · · Score: 3, Informative

      The reason I never used the XP theme (I stuck with the Win2k look while I still used Windows enough to care) is that the window chrome is huge. I don't give a stuff about looks, but I do give a stuff about my screen real-estate being eaten up by "cute" windows. It's not as bad as huge transparent chrome, but it's bad enough.

      You'll find, as you get to higher resolutions, that your annoyance at wasted real estate for things like window decorations goes down. I haven't had a second thought about using something like the Windows XP candy themes since I went over 1024x768 resolution. Actually... at really high resolutions, you're better off using a theme with more "wasted" real estate, because with smaller themes the buttons are easier to miss. I dual boot XP MCE on my laptop (1680x1050 resolution, XP for gaming, Linux for actually using it), and use the default Electric Blue theme in XP.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    16. Re:Notifications by Shaper+of+Myths · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is actually pretty easy to defeat. Just boot into safe mode (XP Home) or regular mode (XP Pro or Media Center). Find the files in C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32 called 'wgalogon.dll' and 'wgatray.exe'. Bring up the file properties, go to the security tab and remove the inherited permissions from the files (don't copy them, strip them completely). Answer yes when it asks if you're sure about this. Reboot and WGA will never bother you again. I've done this on dozens of machines and it just skips the update because its too stupid to fix permissions. The only exception to this is the Service Packs or repair installs. YMMV

      Of course nobody should have to do it in the first place but this is an example of corporate-think at it's best from our fiends in Redmond. If XP is so dead why should they be developing new WGA tricks for it anyways? Sounds to me like its them getting a bit nervous about how many people are jumping ship from Vista and pointing at 'hackers' as the problem. Again. =)

    17. Re:Notifications by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you've already joined those sailing under the Jolly Roger, why would you care?

      If the company goes out of business because it annoyed legitimate customers so much that they became pirates, then I'll count that as the market working (albeit in a perverse sense).

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    18. Re:Notifications by rbanffy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "XP itself(which is actually highly configurable with transparent windows menus etc -- google it -- but why the hell did microsoft keep such a flexible UI so locked down with that lame Blue and Green for so long?)"

      Because if people could make XP less ugly, there would be absolutely no demand for Vista. As it is, Vista is XP with added eye-candy. Gigabytes of it.

    19. Re:Notifications by initialE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For myself it is difficult to support because the interface is not consistent. When you do telephone support it helps when the screen that you see and the screen that the user sees is the same. Instead you have the start menu items that move around, the drop down menus that auto-hide, the control panel that comes in 2 default configurations (I usually ask if they see the blue screen or the white one)...

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    20. Re:Notifications by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Informative
    21. Re:Notifications by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I only run windows because when I put together the system, voice chat in TF2 didn't work under wine (pretty sure it works now, I know it does in CS:S) and now I'm too lazy to reformat and install Ubuntu proper. I only use the computer for firefox, gmail (firefox) and steam games. I'm sure lots of other people only use windows because it meets a basic need and would gladly switch to something free if it were more convenient at install. If microsoft dies because people are pirating an OS they don't even sell anymore causes them to go under, so be it. Vendors will move to a more viable, free platform (likely linux). XP is only a vehicle I'm required to play my games and I have no issue "pirating" a copy. The value of the OS has decreased sharply, and if microsoft wants to continue charging above market value, so be it.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    22. Re:Notifications by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      My problem with wine is that while CS:S et al run, I only get half the performance as in Windows, and Windows I only average 30fps... CS:S is kinda hard to play at ~15fps.

      I use nvidia's drivers, so I would expect that the graphics performance would be approximately the same as in Windows.

      Oh, that, and the Steam Community Overlay doesn't work under wine. I use that a lot.

      If that stuff can be improved, I'd definitely boot into Linux a lot more than I do.

    23. Re:Notifications by Tatsh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Before I begin, let us not forget that WGA has found many computers with 'invalid licences' when indeed the computers were licensed fine. Beyond that, people can have multiple computers with the same OEM key activated, which causes problems with Microsoft's WGA servers, and can potentially cause invalidations. Otherwise legitimate people do not know the EULA and/or care for it. As for pirates, just find another solution or move to Linux; you will not regret it. I used to be an all-Windows person, pirating software, and everything. I thought Keygens were amazing; I thought the warez scene was amazing. Truth be told, the 'scene' is simply the result of things like said in this article, but if anything, the 'scene' should be promoting free alternatives instead of just cracking software all day. All that effort spent cracking some copy protection could be spent making a program that does the same thing.

      The more a volume licence key gets used (it ALWAYS gets passed during Windows Update) the more chance that Microsoft will blacklist it. That is what happened to FCKGW and a number of others.

      As for me, I am a technician on the side and I get volume licence keys from places I visit but I NEVER share them with anyone. So I have like 2 computers (one is mine, however I'm on Linux most of the time anyway; also it's a laptop and has a COA on the bottom anyway) in the house running on volume licence that always pass WGA, but I never allow the daemon to be installed, just the ActiveX control now required to go onto the Windows Update site. Technically, I am OEM licensed, but I would rather not be bothered by WGA so I just use VL keys that I never share with anyone.

      The key posted above is definitely going to be blacklisted soon enough. I would stop while ahead.

      Here's a method to be somewhat legit: Find an OEM key (just look at the side of someone's computer or bottom of someone's laptop for the COA), reinstall OEM Windows with that key, and activate online (which works a lot) or use the phone call method which is now all automated, no representative. Use a pay phone if you are paranoid. You just say 'This is the only computer this copy is installed to', etc. It works!

      Why does this work online? Because Windows activation right now is as so: If the time since the original OEM hardware was activated exceeds 120 days (might be 60), then you may activate an OEM key on ANY new hardware. Violates licence? Yes. Care? No. Microsoft knows? Actually, yes.

      As for businesses, I URGE you to find other solutions than deploying Windows installations plus whatever software. Microsoft is only getting more draconian as time goes along. 3D developers, Maya does run on Linux and Mac. Finance people, Quicken has an online version accessible with any browser. Proprietary software yes, but you can use it without worrying that your OS is just going to randomly shut off because it found (and many times has been wrong) that your OS is 'pirated'.

  3. That's not too bad by faloi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least there's not some odd hidden process that the users have no visibility to running in the background using resources.

    Oh wait...

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    1. Re:That's not too bad by gerf · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wish Ubuntu would do this, instead of having that ugly orange bird looking thing by default. Ugh. That's the first thing I change on any new system; all my backgrounds are plain black.

    2. Re:That's not too bad by sbeckstead · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to make a lame sort of funny reference to your lack of imagination, but I'm all out of ideas.

  4. that's it? by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm impressed with Microsoft's forbearance.

    1. Re:that's it? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm impressed with Microsoft's forbearance.

      I find their lack of faith disturbing.

    2. Re:that's it? by langelgjm · · Score: 5, Funny

      What are you talking about? For the average user, changing the wallpaper is one of the most important functions a computer can perform!

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    3. Re:that's it? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      i hope that's meant to be sarcastic.

      i'm using a Dell my dad gave me as a gift when i went off to college, and it was supposed to come with a copy of XP (pre-installed). naturally, after a few years of use, i had to upgrade the computer/reformat the HDD/etc. during this process i found that Dell didn't actually give me a Windows XP setup disc. they had instead given me some Dell "system recovery" disc that would have re-installed all of their Dell-branded crap and bloatware from their software partners which i'd spent years removing and replacing.

      i found it much more convenient to just borrow a friend's XP disc. however, i realized to my dismay that the XP serial number which came with the Dell didn't actually work with anything except for the Dell OS Recovery disc. and i wasn't going to use that disc (by now i'd lost it anyway) and have to spend a week uninstall everything and manually re-install all the new service packs and updates. so i just ended up using a "pirated" XP setup disc image i found on the web which included all the latest service packs and updates (minus WGA) and no other useless crap.

      unfortunately, i accidentally installed the WGA update one day. and so every time the system starts, and seemingly every 15 minutes after that, i get told that my copy of windows isn't "genuine" which causes whatever program was in the foreground to lose-focus and is particularly annoying when you're typing.

    4. Re:that's it? by hedwards · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dell actually uses a different key on their recovery discs than the one that's on the side of the computer.

      If you open d:\I386\winnt.sif The key is listed in there somewhere. That key also works, and I believe that in the past when I rolled my own discs, that was the one I'd use. IIRC I took the disc from my brother's computer and enter Dell's registration key. That generally worked just fine.

      But that was years ago, and I don't really deal with Windows much these days.

    5. Re:that's it? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I'm surprised they don't HAL_PORTER IS A CHEAPSKATE WHO STOLE WINDOWS do something more drastic.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  5. Help Vista or Linux? by Brad1138 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Some sites have also suggested that this is a sneaky scheme to get more people to buy Windows Vista after disappointing sales of the new OS"

    It's going to be very funny if this does more for Linux than Vista.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by compro01 · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by sbeckstead · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm confused, Microsoft claims great sales of Vista. which is it? We have a bus service where I live that's has a big Vista on the side of the bus, kind of reminds me of the Microsoft product, large lumbering and hardly used because it doesn't go anywhere useful.

    3. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by luwain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem with these schemes by Microsoft is that they more often than not inconvenience legitimate owners of valid licenses. I've had more than a few cases of valid installations of Windows "deactivate". It's doubtful that WGA is "bulletproof" and won't flag some legitimate licenses as invalid and screw-up a loyal Windows users' system. Also, for those who really pirate Windows (are there that many pirates out there??), hacking around WGA is child's play. I think that this will turn more people off than stop pirates. I've been using Ubuntu 8.0.4, and I'm very pleased. I have no problem exchanging documents with Windows users, and since I'm doing development in Java, there's no incompatibility there either, since even the Windows guys are using NetBEans and Eclipse...Is there really much pirating going around that Microsoft has to waste programming resources to combat it? From what I see, people want to BUY XP. Microsoft could probably stop XP from being stolen altogether, if they just continued making it easy for OEMs to offer it, and continued support.

    4. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by Kneo24 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it probably won't do more for Linux than Vista, but it will probably do something positive for Linux in some capacity. What that is, no one really knows.

  6. A new meaning to BSOD... by jt2377 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Black Screen of Death

    1. Re:A new meaning to BSOD... by lastomega7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, death isn't what they are going for. Maybe it should be something like BDOA: Black Desktop of Annoyance.

    2. Re:A new meaning to BSOD... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

      A black desktop reduces power consumption of CRTs, so Microsoft deserve credit for their environmental thinking and consideration for the power bills of those who can't afford LCD monitors or legitimate Windows licenses.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    3. Re:A new meaning to BSOD... by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd like to propose BDSM: Black Desktop Shame Monitor

    4. Re:A new meaning to BSOD... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

      So this is MSochism, step one. Step two is writing a kinky boot sector to your C: drive.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  7. Yawn.... by scarboni888 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can someone remind me why Microsoft wants to chase people off to other platforms again?

    1. Re:Yawn.... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can someone remind me why Microsoft wants to chase people off to other platforms again?

      They're increasing their users' pain thresholds so that they'll find Vista's annoyances tolerable.

    2. Re:Yawn.... by click2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because they're hoping one or two might actually end up buying Vista.

      The Vista Drake Equation

          N = R x fp x ne x fi x fe x L

      where

          N is the number of Vista sales
          R is the number of reported WGA unlicensed XP install hits.
          fp if the fraction of those that care about a black screen & bit of text
          ne is the number of users with PCs that can actually run Vista
          fi is the fraction of XP users who dont have the brains to use Ubuntu
          fe is the fraction of XP users who dont use a tool to kill the WGA app
          L is the fraction of XP users too lazy to get Windows Update to skip the WGA app

      S - Number of sales
      X - Number of illegal XP copies

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
  8. Great. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most people I know who run 'stolen' software don't have the funds, are not otherwise law-breakers, and are not aware of alternatives. I've had great luck giving these people an OpenCD and explaining the law, and, in the case of small businesses, the BSA's tactics.

    I wonder how long it will be before somebody comes along with a registry edit file that will replace the permanent watermark text with a link to Ubuntu?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  9. Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by topham · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just another reason to pirate it since I've triggered the damn tool multiple times on Legitimately licensed product.

    1. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by Howitzer86 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The funny thing is, you're a fool if you update WGA. Just set it to automatic notification instead of automatic download, then you can pick and choose which update you want. You can even tell it never to update that program again.

    2. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by ArsonSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe it's just me, but I usually set my desktop to black anyway as one of the first steps after an install. This sounds to me like a feature rather than a deterrent.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The funny thing is, you're a fool if you update WGA.

      What the hell? No you aren't. Microsoft makes you download it every time you get something off their site that isn't a critical update. So, to have WGA, all you need to do is want some software they make. That's not foolish in the least.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    4. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by GiMP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      all you need to do is want some software they make. That's not foolish in the least.

      Some might beg to differ.

  10. Re:PFFFFFT by wiz31337 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh crap, get ready for another wave of "omg where is the start button" questions on the Ubuntu message boards.

    --
    /whisper/ Thanks for the candy!
  11. *Innocent Whistling* by loteck · · Score: 5, Informative

    Cough, Cough.

    *Continues innocent whistling*

    1. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a machine on which I installed XP Home Edition from original media, but I couldn't find the jewel case, so I had no idea what the serial number was.. Turns out you can just google for keys. One of them will work, and Microsoft never checks again.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ahh Huh. The people who sing on the street corner do it to make money too. That doesn't mean I'm required to pay them for hearing their song.

      The lack of consent in copyright-based transactions is what is so morally repugnant and why so many people refuse to be bullied into paying. You want to be paid for your services? Don't relinquish your control over them.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Urd.Yggdrasil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes. You failed to control your product. Too bad for you.

      That's all I need to know about you to end this conversation.

  12. They're kidding, right? by stinerman · · Score: 5, Funny

    The first thing I do after installing XP is turn the wallpaper to black.

    Apparently, pirating it saves me a step after install.

    WTG, MSFT!

  13. Hmm... by Chris+Acheson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Windows is shareware now?

    1. Re:Hmm... by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Funny

      P L E A S E R E G I S T E R

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  14. I bet that.... by 8127972 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It will still flag perfectly legal copies of Windows as being pirated. Just like it has in the past.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:I bet that.... by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bet it will continue to flag random people at a slowly accelerating rate, thereby pushing more and more people to Vista. That's probably what they think it will push people to, but hey - let's not disillusion them!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  15. Fantastic by RollinDutchMasters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Given that there are a number of pieces of malware which break WGA and cause it to fail to validate (most of which are not trivial to clean out), why exactly would Microsoft have WGA punish them even more? I'd have to imagine that people with actual pirated copies of windows will just continue to not visit windowsupdate and continue to not have the WGA. I don't see this having a major effect on anyone except legitimate users.

  16. My stance on WGA and Vista by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If we assume that one of the purposes of paying for Windows were to provide the user^H^H^H^Hcustomer with a "better Windows Experience" by means of fixing bugs and improving the Operating System in the next version, and due to the fact that Vista Sucks, I say we got ripped off and piracy is our legitimate right.

    And don't get me started into viruses.

  17. Are they *trying* to push people away? by Ynot_82 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know several people who've bought new machines in the last 6 months
    and been forced to have Vista pre-installed

    they didn't want it
    so pirated XP

    are they trying to push people away?
    cause it won't take much to annoy your userbase onto trying alternative OS's

    And I'll tell you what,
    once your average "mere mortal" Windows user, for whatever reason, tries Linux, and likes it
    his testimonial goes a long way with other mere mortals in the same boat

    1. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Ynot_82 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Trying to push people who aren't paying for their products away?
      God forbid any company do such a thing!"

      they paid for Vista (included in OEM cost of machine)
      most see it as unacceptable to pay twice

      "Seriously, if they don't like Vista, the best thing for them is to either a: buy XP or b: get smart, enterprising geeks like yourself to help them with this "linux thing"."

      A) no can do - XP is not (apart from select machines from Dell) sold anymore

      Don't act all high and mighty
      these are not people intentionally out to get something for nothing
      these are people who want to write their university coursework
      and are dissatisfied with the OS thrust upon them
      they paid money to MS, so obtain MS's prior OS

    2. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Shamenaught · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yes, driving away the freeloaders is a big risk for M$. How many illegal copies of windows XP do you think there are in the world? Now imagine if they all ran Linux instead.

      I saw a report recently that said the percentage of PCs with Linux pre-installed was 28 times what it was when vista first shipped. The actual 28 times figure is unimportant, it's more like 14 or 9 times if you look at the months before vista's release, but the actual market share is the important part. That's up to 2.8%, which is comparable to Apple's share.

      What does that mean? Apple's share may not be big, but it's big enough to draw developers like Adobe. When you consider the potential that many of the machines with XP/Vista pre-installed will have been dual-booted to Linux, I'd expect the percentage of new computers with Linux to beat the percentage of new Macs hands-down.

      There are still a lot of computers out there from past years, however, mostly running Windows XP. They'll probably be jumping to either Vista or Linux and, however much WGA they throw at the situation, they can't afford for them to jump to Linux even if it means making Vista easier to pirate, like by removing the reduced-functionality "kill switch" as they did in SP1.

      --
      mysql> SELECT * FROM `places` WHERE `place` LIKE 'home`; Empty set (0.00 sec)
    3. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by cduffy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Look, I paid for a Nissan Rogue. I like my Rogue. But if, for example, I felt like my penis was not quite large enough, I still don't have the right to roll into a Nissan dealership and roll off with a Nissan Xtera.

      I don't know Nissan's product line, so I don't know whether your comparison is apt or not, BUT --

      If someone forces me to buy ${EXPENSIVE_PRODUCT_A} as part of a bundle, and I don't want it -- instead I want ${CHEAP_PRODUCT_B}, I'm not going to feel the least bit in the wrong for forcefully trading the ${EXPENSIVE_PRODUCT_A} I was saddled with for a ${CHEAP_PRODUCT_B}.

      Legally wrong? Sure. Morally wrong? In the case of software -- where they don't need to manufacture or ship ship physical objects, or otherwise incur costs, on account of my action -- I'm going to take a "no".

    4. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Shamenaught · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They could've justified it to shareholders the same way they justified the "We've decided to make our systems as incompatible with everything else as possible" conversation.

      They could write and release drivers that let them access Linux and Mac file systems, for example, or to have released proper specs for the NTFS system. They didn't though, on the grounds that it'd make moving away from their domination more likely.

      In-fact, they don't need to justify letting people steal as much as they'd need to justify spending on anti-piracy measures. Show them a graph showing how much has been spent on WGA versus how little profit it made them. Follow that up with a comment like "it's notable that as we spend more on these measures, a number of users will be moving to free alternatives such-as Linux, weakening our overall market dominance" and you have the shareholders on your side.

      --
      mysql> SELECT * FROM `places` WHERE `place` LIKE 'home`; Empty set (0.00 sec)
    5. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I spent last night installing XP on a Toshiba Satellite A200 laptop for a friend who has tolerated Vista for about 6 months now.

      Not surprisingly, Toshiba (like Dell and many others) has signed a deal with the devil not to provide support for anything other than Vista (honestly, I can see why they might do a deal to pre-install Vista, but why stop loyal Toshiba customers from installing XP if they want to? Crazy).

      However, what is truly impressive is the hatred for Vista out there on the net, and the lengths that it inspires people to go to to get rid of it and, in the spirit of the net, help others get rid of it. Googling for info about getting XP up and running on this particular machine yielded pages and pages of helpful information about exactly what must be done to round up the necessary drivers (many from the OEM's who supplied the various components of the machine). Even better, a few heroes had actually compiled zip files containing every driver and distributed them via Rapidshare and the like.

      The other really startling thing was how many non-expert users were doing this. There were heaps of messageboard posts where inexperienced users basically begged for help to get XP working on their laptops. Due to the bod of Vista-hatred, the more tech savvy users were generally walking people through the process with a level of patience rarely seen on-line.

      I had the same experience installing XP on my Dell XPS 1530 (great computer, once you disinfect it) - there is basically a community dedicated to purging it of Vista.

      When you are inspiring legions of both expert users and ordinary non-techy people to go through the pain of installing an operating system using an ad hoc collection of unsupported drivers, something is badly, badly awry. I am critical not of MS so much as Toshiba, Dell and co - they are the ones who have made the key decision to support nothing but Vista. I wonder if they realise the lengths their users are going to to get around this choice?

      Incidentally, my friend's reaction was priceless when XP booted up quickly and quietly - "holy shit... you mean it's done? it's so... responsive! It's beautiful!" He then checked the memory usage and noted with awe that it was 120 megs after booting rather than 1 to 1.5 gigs for Vista.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    6. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While I don't disagree with you in any way, I'm always curious why people are upset when their RAM is being used. As I understand it, Vista pre-loads into RAM applications that you use often, thus (ideally) speeding up load time. RAM is there to be used; why do we get upset when we see near-100% usage? Personally, I don't care what XP's RAM usage is when I boot up, as long as it's responsive. If increasing XP's RAM usage to 1.5GB on bootup by loading stuff I use regularly would make my applications load faster, I would beg for it to be done.

      Anyone have any ideas about this?

  18. colors by globaljustin · · Score: 4, Funny

    now microsoft has officially left it's users black and blue

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:colors by racermd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What's funny is my desktop is intentionally black. Has been for years - through Windows 2000, Windows XP, and now Vista. I just like it that way.

      Active desktop? Puh-leeze.
      Pictures of cats? Why?!
      Patterns? Too distracting.
      Other colors? Meh.

      I once tried BGInfo but even that was a black background with green text. It lasted a week before I took it out and went back to basic black.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    2. Re:colors by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I personally prefer a nice medium-dark gray--a very neutral color.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:colors by Monoman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Amen brotha! In the days of CRTs I started using black to avoid seeing the annoying edges around certain monitors.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    4. Re:colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      1: Take screenshot of desktop with dozens of files and icons.
      2: Replace wallpaper with screenshot
      3: Empty Desktop
      4: ???
      5: Tell user to reboot to fix problem, preferably 10 times.

    5. Re:colors by KillerBob · · Score: 4, Funny

      I did that to somebody at work when she forgot to lock her desktop for a meeting.... she almost had IT reimage her desktop to fix it before noticing that the rest of us were sitting around snickering at her.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    6. Re:colors by QRDeNameland · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pictures of cats? Why?!

      I can haz pie-ratted Win-does?

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    7. Re:colors by couchslug · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I once tried BGInfo but even that was a black background with green text."

      Black text would have been much less obtrusive.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    8. Re:colors by Ucklak · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about the standard #008080

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    9. Re:colors by AnotherUsername · · Score: 3, Funny

      I prefer the standard #FF1492

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    10. Re:colors by beav007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I prefer the standard #8008135

    11. Re:colors by beav007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You missed some bits.

      2.3) Set the task bar to "Autohide" and move it to the top of the screen.
      2.6) If it's a desktop compter, use the monitor controls to stretch/move the screen upwards enough to hide the remaining visible part of the taskbar.

      AND
      Replace #3 with:
      3) Right-click desktop, go to "Arrange Icons By" -> and untick "Show Desktop Icons".

    12. Re:colors by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Desktop black: check
      Icons at a minimum: check
      Window style: classic; I go with "brick" with a black desktop
      Screen saver: none; powersave in battery mode

      Seriously...I like my stuff simple and organized. I'd definitely call this a feature. Then again, I don't give a shit. I buy almost exclusively Dell computers, and the OEM tying to the BIOS is a serious feature for me. Lets me almost entirely avoid the whole activation thing. If I had to do it over again, I'd buy a dell box instead of building a box for my media center. I'll run linux, or some civilized OS should one exist, on my homebrew boxes from now on.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    13. Re:colors by Ucklak · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you didn't get it, #008080 is the default background for Windows 95/98

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    14. Re:colors by the_B0fh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Still not anal enough to be Steve Jobs. He once spent 3 months selecting the perfect color for the NeXT cube. 400+ different shades of *BLACK*

    15. Re:colors by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      He once spent 3 months selecting the perfect color for the NeXT cube. 400+ different shades of *BLACK*

      I think he's color blind. It would explain why his initial machines tend to be black and white.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    16. Re:colors by Dantoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they want to upset people using unlicensed installs, I wonder.....

      Wouldn't it be more effective to just force a desktop featuring Ballmer glaring out at you while simultaneously reaching for a chair?

    17. Re:colors by therufus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or better yet, arrange your icons in the shape of a penis with balls like the website is down.

      --
      You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
    18. Re:colors by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Black on black, that's how I want it... I don't care if anyone can read it. I'm the DRIZZLE!"

    19. Re:colors by RadioElectric · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm really into the Windows Zune theme (black start/taskbars with orange buttons).

    20. Re:colors by INT_QRK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am an avid user of Linux and free software, and I say "good for Microsoft." Stealing is immoral -- period. They have a right to protect their products. That said, whenever I find excellent Open Source that suits my needs, I use it, and usually make a donation if and when I decide to keep it. However, when an excellent quality proprietary product provides what I need, and can't find a satisfactory enough free aternative, then I gladly pay for it. I would never steal it. My main gripes against MS are asinine EULAS, unwanted or unneeded "upgrades" (especially those that degrade usability, and file formats that provide little added value, are prone to frequent corruption, and are intended only to force vendor lock-in), covert "calling-home," and sometimes poor performance. That said, some of their products really do, in my opinion, provide the best value in their fields.

    21. Re:colors by ottothecow · · Score: 3, Funny
      When I do it, I usually leave the start menu in place but screenshot the desktop.

      Most users who would fall for it probably use the desktop for something but would still be able to sort of use their system with the start menu only but be unable to access documents they save there.

      Of course last april fools day I tried to do it to my roommate. I forgot I had done it and he didnt really react (turns out he had just blamed it on the computer messing up and was too lazy to reboot to fix it)..it wasn't until I tried to get a file from him that he had downloaded. The torrent client said it was saved to the desktop but I couldnt find it for the life of me. Took me a minute to realize what I had done...

      --
      Bottles.
    22. Re:colors by donstenk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also black is energy and brightness saving as all pixels are off. Makes for more relaxing, uhm, darkness around the active windows.

      --
      Dennis Onstenk
  19. Answer: Naggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Question: People who annoy you?

  20. Pfff.... No imagination by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 5, Funny

    They need to get more creative. Here's a few ideas:

    1) Cause the NIC to drop random ammounts of packets at random times.

    2) Change the wallpaper from Black Screen to one with a letter ending with "... The police are on their way".

    3) Every 2 minutes all keys on your keyboard get randomly swapped around.

    4) Swaps the mouse buttons. Or moving the mouse left, moves it right, up, down, etc.

    5) All print jobs only result in large words in upper case saying "PIRATE ALERT!"

    6) Boot sequence and shutdown sequence get 5 minutes added on to them. Hey MS, don't forget to make sure you cause the hard drive light LED to flicker a lot while the users wait around so they think it's something going on. While you're at it, randomly flicker that HD LED every few minutes for 20 seconds at a time.

    7) Every 10th web page visited would be redirected to goatse (is that site still around?)

    You get the idea... now hurry up so that people get fed up faster and switch to Linux.

    --
    No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
    1. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by ooburns · · Score: 3, Funny

      And change the Windows XP logo at bootup to large, frindly letters that read Don't Panic.

    2. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by microbee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or just pop up a lock-out box and force user to type "I am a pirate and I am ashamed of myself". Three times.

    3. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by pla · · Score: 2, Informative

      6) Boot sequence and shutdown sequence get 5 minutes added on to them. Hey MS, don't forget to make sure you cause the hard drive light LED to flicker a lot while the users wait around so they think it's something going on. While you're at it, randomly flicker that HD LED every few minutes for 20 seconds at a time.

      You had me up until that one... How would users tell the difference if MS decided to use #6? Windows already randomly waits a few minutes for no apparent reason on startup and shutdown...

      And the 20s HDD bursts happen all the time, not just at "special" times. Out of the blue, Windows decides to flog the disk, while the user gets to wait. I think it has something to do with the pagefile, but of course, Windows doesn't provide any meaningful information about why it has decided to stop responding for 15-30s at a time.


      My Linux ad - "If you have enough memory, you can turn off swap."

    4. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by neonsignal · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Some more ideas:
      • Every now and then put up a text screen with undecipherable gibberish and a blue background.
      • When a printer is not plugged in, hang the application for 30 seconds before putting up an error message.
      • Gradually leak memory until the computer crawls and has to be rebooted.
      • Automatically download updates that use the entire modem bandwidth and install software that the user didn't ask for.
      • By default enable all daemons so that the user doesn't have any memory waste.
      • Provide a zero configuration firewall that doesn't block spyware sending messages out.
      • Build keyboards with a system key near the most used keys on the keyboard.
      • Distribute word processing software that by default can't load up documents from previous versions of the same software.
      • Pop up messages warning of dire consequences whenever manufacturer supplied drivers are installed.
    5. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by LihTox · · Score: 3, Funny

      8) All open windows slowly slide down the screen until only their title bars are visible (although the user can keep pulling them back up as needed).

  21. Nagware by Speare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, Windows is essentially a nagware product now? Choose to pay or not, depending on whether you think it'll be less painful? When will they append third-party advertisements to every file you save? When will it whisper subliminal insults into your audio stream?

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  22. this happened to me, a legit user by pezpunk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i paid for windows vista ultimate edition *waits for laughter to die down* but after a few months, i discovered that the machine i installed it on had some dodgy RAM and i had to replace it. i don't know if it was because i changed the RAM or because the bad RAM corrupted something, but after that Microsoft decided that my copy of Windows was pirated, and put a permanent message in the lower-right corner of my machine telling me as much, and refused to let me use certain features, such as the Aero graphics enhancements.

    personally, i suggest microsoft take a page from our founding fathers, and adopt a more "innocent until proven guilty" attitude (for example, offering a way to call them up and verify your CD Key) before implementing more draconian punishments upon the convicted!

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
    1. Re:this happened to me, a legit user by pembo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You paid for it... I hear you get support with that. Much better support than IRC, mailing lists, or direct email addresses of potentially helpful developers. How did your paid support work out? If it didn't help, were you able to sue them for damages?

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    2. Re:this happened to me, a legit user by aerthling · · Score: 2, Informative

      i suggest microsoft take a page from our founding fathers, and adopt a more "innocent until proven guilty" attitude

      That's exactly what Microsoft have done here. This is just a reminder that they may be a victim of piracy, and only if their license has been examined and found to be invalid.
      Users aren't being punished, they're just being alerted that their operating system isn't licensed.

  23. Bull by jmorris42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Most people I know who run 'stolen' software don't have the funds, are not otherwise law-breakers,
    > and are not aware of alternatives.

    Oh bull, if they can afford the computer they could have afforded to get the OEM preload instead of the pirate version from the neighborhood screwdriver shop. Or if they built it themselves then they damned sure could have sprung for an OEM copy when they bought the other bits. Most custom built machines are gaming rigs these days and if you can afford the video card for gaming you can afford a copy of XP. IF you can afford the GAMES you can afford XP... oh, they bootleg the games too.

    And yes, they are probably lawbreakers in other areas too... anything THEY decide they should be able to do they probbaly do.

    The only sensible thing is your attempts to get em on a legal alternative.

    Stopping bootleg software should be the #1 priority of the Free Software movement as it is our primary competition. The main argument one hears when pitching Free (talking about individuals here, large installs do pay) is that they argue back that what they have is also free, in that it either came preloaded and thus they have no idea how much of the purchase price was the OEM licenses or they are using bootleg software that is 'free.' If people actually had to PAY for software like Office, OO.o would be installed a lot more often.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Bull by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of them upgraded old computers with XP and Office they 'borrowed' from work. Custom gaming rigs exist in a parallel universe for the typical home user.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  24. Another push to get people using Vista by Shamenaught · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My theory: This isn't actually an effort to get more people buying windows directly, but to maintain market dominance. M$ are squeezing the illegal XP 'market', trying to get them to use illegal Vista instead.

    This is merely the first step, they'll eventually add checks for the most common cracks, followed by kill switches. This comes after service pack 1 removed the kill switch from Vista, making it less risky to pirate.

    Whilst this might see a few people jumping ship to Linux or something, I'm guessing M$ decided the risks of losing a few freeloaers outweighed the importance of removing the XP-shaped-thorn from their side.

    Get everyone doin' the downgrade, that way people will be used to it for when windows 7 comes out. M$ have learnt their lesson, and won't be creating any more good operating systems any time soon. It's less profitable!

    --
    mysql> SELECT * FROM `places` WHERE `place` LIKE 'home`; Empty set (0.00 sec)
  25. Black? Seriously? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, that'll turn the h4xx04z away. Want to really make it worthwhile? Force a pink-on-pink color scheme, license the theme song to "My Little Pony", and play that in an uninterruptable background loop on all available sound devices. That'll do a lot more to keep a kid honest than would making his desktop look 1337.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  26. Windows Genuine Annoyance by Morgaine · · Score: 3, Informative

    This latest feature is just one more reason for people to run pirate copies, with that particular "Advantage" disabled.

    Microsoft really doesn't get it. The only way to make people buy your software is to make it useful and friendly, not by making it annoying.

    This is just a small part of Microsoft's huge misconception about operating systems. No Microsoft, people don't buy operating systems to benefit you, nor to benefit third parties like content providers. People buy operating systems to benefit THEMSELVES.

    Such a simple concept, but apparently incomprehensible to Microsoft.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  27. Re:Good thing by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny

    What requires WGA anyhow?

    * Microsoft Marketing
    * Microsoft Sales
    * Microsoft Legal
    * Bill Gates' wallet
    * Steve Ballmer's wallet

    I'm sure there are more that you can think of.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  28. Sweet! by gillbates · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Relative: Why does my computer lose my wallpaper and give me a black screen every hour?

    Me: Ah, that's just Vista for you. You have to pay Microsoft to get rid of that.

    Relative: Why? Why should I have to pay Microsoft? Why doesn't it just work?

    Me: A.) It's not Linux, so it won't "just work" no matter what you do, and B.) You didn't really expect Microsoft to let you use their computer for free, did you?

    Relative: Um, I already paid for it-

    Me: Yes, you paid for the computer. But you didn't pay Microsoft. You have to pay Microsoft before you can use it. You own the computer, they own the software.

    Relative: So wait - you have to pay for both the computer and Microsoft?

    Me: No, I use Linux. I only have to pay for the computer.

    Relative: But if I paid Microsoft, I'd own both the computer, and the software, right?

    Me: No, you would own just the computer. Microsoft would still own the software.

    Relative: But I could move the software to a new computer if I bought the software, right?

    Me: No, that's not how Microsoft works. You pay them, and you get to use the software on that computer. They still own it - you don't - and you can't move it from computer to computer.

    Relative: So let me get this straight: I pay Microsoft for software, and they still own it?! What kind of $&*!@ is that?

    Me: Yep, that's how proprietary software works. You get to use it, but you can't own it.

    Relative: So how is it that you don't have to pay Microsoft?

    Me: I run Linux.

    At this point, it starts to sink in that pirating Windows isn't doing them any favors. As far as I'm concerned, if you want to use proprietary software, you can pay for it.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Sweet! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Me: A.) It's not Linux, so it won't "just work" no matter what you do...

      Linux. It Just Works.
      (Your experience may vary.)

      Me: No, that's not how Microsoft works. You pay them, and you get to use the software on that computer. They still own it - you don't...

      That's not an artefact of proprietary software, it's basic copyright. I can download Ubuntu, but I do not own Ubuntu. I have a single copy, or as many duplicates as I want. I can't just do what I like with it though (eg change the branding and sell it as my own work sans source code) - there are rules for redistribution and all that. Nearly all software has some rules you must follow. F/OSS is not above this.

      And you can move Windows to other PCs. I've done it. It might require a call to the Windows Activation team, but it's not hard. You can't have it on two at the same time though, but you can shift it.

      I'm not a Windows user, except in the office. I'm a fan of Linux, even though I've never managed to really get it working right. I don't think you should misinform people about what proprietary software is or isn't though - only honest, accurate information is worth using to change people's minds about F/OSS.

  29. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by mcmonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want to run windows update without IE:

    http://windizupdate.com/

    I suppose you could use it to update without installing WGA.

  30. Dear MS from a paying customer by sheepofblue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a paying customer I don't want to take the time to call you and sit on hold for hours just so I can use what I paid for after your "upgrade" happens by YOUR mistake.

    I get so sick of companies treating me a paying customer as an adversary. Years ago I played games and actually enjoyed them. But when DRM made me into a CD swapping machine despite me having more than enough HD space they lost the fun factor and became a hassle. Now I don't game hardly at all. Of course anyone that illegally subverted the DRM is still gaming including non-paying customers. Seems self defeating.

    Good luck MS though I see this as another reason that Apple and Linux will continue to grow.

  31. Please help by fishthegeek · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm trying to figure out what all the fuss is about but I can't find this WGA thing. Does anyone know what repository it's in?

    --
    load "$",8,1
  32. Star Wars Reference by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 4, Funny

    The more you tighten your grip, the more systems will slip through your fingers.

    It was a tossup between that quote and "Governor Tarkin, I should have expected to find you holding Vader's leash. I recognized your foul stench when I was brought on board."

    More of the same. Just let go.

  33. Re:PFFFFFT by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's a good thing. Treat the noobs respectfully. Ultimately it's lack of respect from MS that's driving them away. If they get that same attitude from Ubuntu they'll just label you as asses and go back to MS.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  34. WGA never works for my genuine copies anyways. by greysunrise · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's too bad that WGA never recognizes genuine copies of Windows given to students at my university. I think it is due to the fact that the disks are produced on campus under a distribution license, or, The Pirate Bay is hosted inside the dark cave on campus. Just a thought.

    1. Re:WGA never works for my genuine copies anyways. by spire3661 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a VLK XP key from college in 2001 that i still use to this day, ive literally installed it hundreds of times ( on my own machines). I have used the key so many times i have it memorized.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:WGA never works for my genuine copies anyways. by 427_ci_505 · · Score: 5, Funny

      FCKGW...?

  35. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Doesn't update all optional packs and updates, though, and doesn't host patches that require validation. (Which is a good thing, but it's still very limited.)

    --
    "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
  36. It's like, how much more black could this be? by irae · · Score: 5, Funny

    And the answer is none. None more black.

    1. Re:It's like, how much more black could this be? by laejoh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd mod your comment all the way up to six if I could!

      Nigel Tufnel: The numbers all go to 6. Look, right across the board, 6, 6 and...

      Marty DiBergi: Oh, I see. And most slashdot comments go up to 5?

      Nigel Tufnel: Exactly.

      Marty DiBergi: Does that mean it's funnier? Is it any funnier?

      Nigel Tufnel: Well, it's one funnier, isn't it? It's not 5. You see, most blokes, you know, will be modding at 5. You're on 5 here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on 5 on your original posting. Where can you go from there? Where?

      Marty DiBergi: I don't know.

      Nigel Tufnel: Nowhere. Exactly. What we do is, if we need that extra push over the cliff, you know what we do?

      Marty DiBergi: Put it up to 6.

      Nigel Tufnel: 6. Exactly. One funnier.

      Marty DiBergi: Why don't you just make 5 funnier and make 5 be the top number and make that a little funnier?

      Nigel Tufnel: [pause] These go to 6.

  37. Re:PFFFFFT by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Modded troll or not, I have to agree. Smart users don't even have WGA installed on their legal copies of XP (yes, I like to think I'm one of those). I don't want a background process eating my machine's resources just so Microsoft can do the electronic equivalent of a strip-search every 10 minutes. If it doesn't actually benefit me it gets the hell off of my computer, fast.

    --
    I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
  38. Re:PFFFFFT by chubs730 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a tough job handling the ubuntu IRC channel. The other day some guy was asking how to maximize firefox. We told him to click the box in the upper right corner, and he didn't understand. So someone asked what version he was running, and he gave the output of firefox -v (or whatever command it is for version). It was baffling that he could use the command line but not maximize the window. I think (hope) he was joking. Or maybe it was Richard Stallman.

  39. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by nabsltd · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can always run your own WSUS server.

    This lets you control exactly what does and does not get installed, and WGA isn't even available through WSUS (although Office Genuine Advantage is). If you have more than two computers running Windows 2000 or later, WSUS is a big help for saving bandwidth and assuring you get patched up-to-date quickly.

    Unfortunately, it requires Windows 2003 Server to run, but it is completely free (as in beer).

  40. Push pirates off XP by ThePhilips · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it only me who think that real target are the pirates in 3rd world (China, India) and real goal is to push them to adopt Vista?

    Economy of piracy has its mechanics and M$ exploited it many times. Many developers get first taste of programming on pirated Windows using pirated development software. M$ had rather them pirating Vista.

    All this WGA thing is really nothing, because there are bunch of packs floating on net with XP and Vista stripped of all unnecessary stuff (like license checks). Most active pirates will not be affected by M$' change of WGA by a bit.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  41. Free your Linux box! by vimm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Were you a victim of Linux Genuine Advantage scheme to make millions? Linux Genuine Advantage Crack will restore free as in speech rights to what should have been in the first place. Down with the man!

  42. Re:to be fair by sreid · · Score: 2, Informative

    niggle, new word for me...

  43. Re:PFFFFFT by KillerBob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Modded troll or not, I have to agree. Smart users don't even have WGA installed on their legal copies of XP (yes, I like to think I'm one of those). I don't want a background process eating my machine's resources just so Microsoft can do the electronic equivalent of a strip-search every 10 minutes. If it doesn't actually benefit me it gets the hell off of my computer, fast.

    It doesn't actually run in the background. It does the authenticity check at startup, and it vets your computer when you try to install an update which requires authentication, and that's it. And there are actual, honest-to-goddess important updates that won't install without such authentication.

    *shrugs* but I guess I'm not what you'd consider a "smart" user, in that I choose to let it do its rigamorole on the 4 computers I have running Windows... my laptop, which dual boots with XP MCE, my HTPC which is running Vista Ultimate (both came from MSDN), and my parents' laptops, running XP Home and Vista Home Premium respectively.

    Incidentally... none of those systems have ever had issues, performance or otherwise, with WGA. I'm not saying that it doesn't screw over legitimate users. But I am saying that I've never seen an issue with it, and that the ability to install security and stability updates that you couldn't otherwise install outweighs the marginal increase in boot time, which is about the only thing you actually notice when you install/activate WGA.

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  44. Re:Was that in the EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wrong:

    * Mandatory Activation. The license rights granted under this EULA are limited to the first thirty (30) days after you first install the Product unless you supply information required to activate your licensed copy in the manner described during the setup sequence of the Product. You can activate the Product through the use of the Internet or telephone; toll charges may apply. You may also need to reactivate the Product if you modify your computer hardware or alter the Product. There are technological measures in this Product that are designed to prevent unlicensed or illegal use of the Product. You agree that we may use those measures.

    (Emphasis mine)

    Sounds like you agreed to anything Microsoft wants to do, including harassment. Just another reason you shouldn't be using an OS that assumes everyone is a criminal by default.

  45. Stuff by Vexorian · · Score: 2, Interesting
    • I wonder if this would affect my pirated copy of windows which basically runs inside a virtual machine that gives it no internet access whatsoever (too much responsibility for windows) ...
    • Nevermind the black background, that water mark seems more annoying, what is not specified in the article is whether this watermark will be visible even when there is a maximized window.
    • My brother is a windows user, however when MSN decided not to work unless you upgrade it, and that stuff could require WGA, he just... switched to pidgin, I wonder if MS is underestimating users, they may not be switching to Linux, but they will slowly simply stop using their stuff. If they make IE8 require WGA, that just means more firefox/safari/opera users, WGA is slowly affecting their market share, I personally hope they only notice this when it is too late.
    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  46. RemoveWGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I choose to not allow WGA to install itself, however a family member recently accidently installed this update, and upon reboot was horrified to find a new login screen and desktop. They thought it was a virus!
    I took a look at the processes running, and found WGATray, which upon killing, restarts itself within seconds. It was the only windows update in add/remove programs that couldn't be uninstalled. This stuff is as bad as spyware/malware.

    If you want to get rid of it, find a copy of RemoveWGA.exe on google, this thing works wonders. I ran it, rebooted, and WGA was well gone.

  47. Black screen - OMG by dindi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, that is copy protection. Guess what, my default screen is black. Even though OSX does not allow it, I just set a black gif (10x10 pixels) as the BG image.

    I know, many of you like (just as me scuba pictures, cars, babes, bikes, nersy images, superheroes) but at the end I WANT TO SEE MY DAM ICONS, so the best is a black background.

    OK, Working as a programmer in the sportsbetting industry today (kickoff day) is a bit stressy, and after coding 12 hours at my (8 hour a day) consulting job pretty much kicked my arse, and I drank some rum from the Dominican Repubic ( ie I am kinda drunk).....

    Anyway, black BG is best, that is the ultimate oldscshool, and working in the *NIX environment this is the best you can set.

    So does MS expect to scare people with this mean black BG ?

  48. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

    Um....I hate to break the news to you,but if you would have read the news section at Windiz after nobody came forward when they requested help coding the site they quit updating it. So the newest patch there is from 2006. Doesn't really help when the latest bug strikes. There used to be a site with a batch file which downloaded Windows Updates,but I'm afraid I no longer have the link. But going to Windiz is pretty much a waste of time and I don't know why the site is still up.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  49. Re:Black? Niggles? by operagost · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, if so many weren't too niggardly to purchase a legit copy of Windows, this wouldn't be a problem!

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  50. It could be more annoying. by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Think about it. Microsoft could have did stuff like this. Thankfully, they didn't.

    Change the homepage to Microsoft's website, perhaps a page about Windows XP and piracy.

    Have Clippit pop up in the corner of Windows XP, saying, "It looks like you're using a pirated copy of Windows. Would you like to purchase one now?"

    Slow one's Internet connection to 56kbps speed, except when doing Windows Updates.

    Disable any and all video capabilities.

    Limit the display to 800 x 600 at 8-bit colour.

    Disable accessing certain file types, such as video files, music files, etc. (Jokingly, because if you pirate Windows, you might be pirating other things as well.)

  51. Oblig by SpooForBrains · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Every time you operate one of these weird black controls, labelled in black on a black background, a little black light lights up black to let you know you've done it"

    --
    "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
  52. An improvement by taff^2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If this stops my screen going blue every 15 minutes I'll be happy

    --
    Karma: Bad. (As in Good?)
  53. Don't Touch My Wallpaper! by BigBlueOx · · Score: 2, Funny

    My wallpaper is a screenshot of the entrance to that giant space cigar Doomsday Machine from Star Trek and I like to sit in front of it, squirming in my chair making faces-of-horror and sweating while singing "da-da da-da DA-DA DA-DA".

    But look at who I'm telling! Of course most of you reading this do the exact same thing! Ha ha ha.

    What?