Slashdot Mirror


Weird Al To Release Songs As He Records Them

slapout writes "Weird Al has announced that with the Internet he can now release his songs for sale as he records each one rather than waiting for a whole album to be produced."

333 comments

  1. Just because he can... by monktus · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...doesn't mean that he should.

    --
    Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals... except the weasel."
    1. Re:Just because he can... by electrictroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes it does mean he should. Through his actions he can demonstrate that an artist doesn't need the corporate engine in order to succeed. He can use the internet to eliminate the waste of the middle man.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    2. Re:Just because he can... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      While it's true that doesn't follow automatically, I tend to think Weird Al is a great example of an artist who can and should pursue non-traditional distribution mechanisms. On the one hand he has a large enough following and existing name to be able to get the ball rolling, but on the other hand he appeals very much to a niche audience (a sizeable niche, but a niche nonetheless) that impedes the effectiveness of traditional distribution channels in getting his work out there. Radio stations, for example, don't like to play him that much, because too many listeners aren't really into it. The popularity of his music spreads mostly by word of mouth. It always has. Online distribution is a perfect match for that.

      Now, I don't know that releasing individual songs is necessarily the best way for him to go. But I don't know that it's not, either. Best way to find out is probably to try it and see how it goes.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    3. Re:Just because he can... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Funny

      TRIVIA - In both 1988 and 2008 it took 1 hour to download a game. Internet speeds have kept pace with growing demand.

      94% of all internet facts are made up on the spot.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    4. Re:Just because he can... by Mordaximus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Much like Trent Reznor and Radiohead, he's got tons of cash to play around with and experiment - cash made while riding the corporate engine. I'll subscribe to your theory when I see a brand new artist do the same thing and make a profit from it.

    5. Re:Just because he can... by king-hobo · · Score: 1, Funny

      84% of all people know that

    6. Re:Just because he can... by I+Am+JAFI · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You mean, like Jonathan Coulton?

    7. Re:Just because he can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean, like Jonathan Coulton?

      Who?

    8. Re:Just because he can... by electrictroy · · Score: 4, Informative

      >>>94% of all internet facts are made up on the spot.

      Except this one is verifiable:
      1988 - download of 880k floppy game over then-typical 2400 baud modem =~ 1 hour (from my own personal experience)
      2008 - download of 4000 megabyte game over typical 10 Mbit/s cable =~ 1 hour (math)

      Naturally the actual time will vary if your 1988 computer had a double-sized floppy (takes 2 hours) or if you are downloading a dual-sided DVD (also 2 hours). But Slashdot's signature length limit precludes me from including all that detail. The important point to note is that speeds have escalated to match demand. We have never experienced the so-called "speed limit" that certain Chicken Littles keep claiming we're going to hit. They are just blowing a lot of hot air, and have been doing so for almost 15 years now. Their claims have no merit.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    9. Re:Just because he can... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess my bigger issue is your definition of game size. I know that sizes vary wildly. In the 80's, I had some games that fit on one floppy, and others that spanned at least 4, and you had to swap as you made it to other parts of the game. The same is true today.

      However, if you argument is that we don't have an imminent bandwidth crisis, I will agree. However, we do need to invest in more infrastructure. With a soon-to-be $11 Trillion dollar debt in the U.S., I sincerely worry that our infrastructure will not be a priority (and probably hasn't been a priority for some time).

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    10. Re:Just because he can... by EaglemanBSA · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about Imogen Heap? Last I knew, she did her own producing.

      --
      Quiz: True or False -- On a scale of 1 to 10, what is your middle name?
    11. Re:Just because he can... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Where in the article does it say anything about not needing the corporate engine to succeed? In fact, since he says 'I am only supposed to tease this release' instead of 'I only want to tease this release', it sounds to me like he is still very much involved in the traditional model. The only thing that is new is he releasing tracks earlier. And note that the reason he wants to release earlier is so his tracks can be 'more topical', which sounds like a business decision to me. Lastly, he is releasing to iTunes, which is hardly non-corporate.

      The only 'waste' that is being eliminated here is the actual pressing and transportation of disks, and the retailers. The other functions provided by the 'corporate engine' and still being provided. Things like access to studio time, recording engineers, marketing, and most importantly, the up-front money to give the artists the time they need to create the tracks.

      I have yet to hear of the 'new model' that provides the money for the artists to be able to make the recordings, without the expectation of making the money back, with profit. When that model appears, and a majority of artists start using it, then you can talk about demonstrating changes.

    12. Re:Just because he can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Just because he can... ...doesn't mean that he should.

      That's right.

      I'm announcing that with the internets I can blog everything that pops into my mind immediately.

      (We all know how that ended up.)

    13. Re:Just because he can... by fragbait · · Score: 1

      ....doesn't need the corporate engine in order to CONTINUE to succeed. He was already successful with help from the corporate machine.

      -fragbait

    14. Re:Just because he can... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I guess my bigger issue is your definition of game size.

      Exactly what I was thinking. It's pretty easy to "prove" his point if he just picks two sizes that work out mathematically and declare those the standard sizes for games.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    15. Re:Just because he can... by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      92.7% of people agree that real numbers are no more useful than the ones you make up.

    16. Re:Just because he can... by gottebag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      who?

    17. Re:Just because he can... by El+Yanqui · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think this form of distribution benefits Weird Al far more most other artists. While many nerds here believe he has created music for the ages, his songs work best when they're topical. Amish Paradise is funniest when it is held in comparison to Gangsta's Paradise. Same goes for Eat It and all of his parodies. To appreciate a parody you need to know the original.

      This way of distributing his songs allows him to seize on any momentary pop culture phenomenon and have the general public, those who don't read /. or go to math camp, buy them.

      --
      Well, thanks to the Internet, I'm now bored with sex.
    18. Re:Just because he can... by Jaknet · · Score: 1

      Radio stations, for example, don't like to play him that much, because too many listeners aren't really into it.

      I wonder how much of this is like the "chicken and egg, which was first?" question.

      People don't know him so he does not get played on the radio, but because he does not get played on the radio people don't get to know him.

      I suspect that if he was played constantly on the radio same as the corporate mass produced "artists" are he would be much more popular.

    19. Re:Just because he can... by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fugazi (& they were doing it 15 years ago), MC Chris, Silversun Pickups, Death Cab for Cutie (until recently), The Decemberists, The Shins, NIRVANA, The Postal Service, Rehab (again until recently), Arcade Fire...

      There are quite a few acts that have pulled themselves up by their own bootstraps. Just because you haven't heard of them or you don't like the genre, doesn't mean they don't exist.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    20. Re:Just because he can... by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Without the boost of the CC he never would have made it big. All hail CC!

    21. Re:Just because he can... by FoboldFKY · · Score: 1

      2008 - download of 4000 megabyte game over typical 10 Mbit/s cable =~ 1 hour (math)

      Not if you live in Australia. The best I can ever hope to get* is 1.5 Mbit, and even that's relatively expensive.

      * barring Telstra upgrading infrastructure, but they'll do that when hell freezes over, the pack of purse-pinching bastards.

      --
      We're geeks... We're the sorcerers of the modern-day world. --
    22. Re:Just because he can... by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      Especially since most "real numbers" are derived from studies with biased researchers trying to get a result that favors their political view.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    23. Re:Just because he can... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      There are quite a few acts that don't rely on MPAA marketing budgets That's why you haven't heard of them.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    24. Re:Just because he can... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      There are quite a few acts that don't rely on RIAA marketing budgets That's why you haven't heard of them.

      Fixed that for me.

      Damnit.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    25. Re:Just because he can... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "he can demonstrate that an artist doesn't need the corporate engine"

      After succeeding and making a butt-load of money using that engine.

      A better test would be to follow a new artist doing the same thing and see if they become as successful.

    26. Re:Just because he can... by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      %100 of people know the discussion is redundant.

    27. Re:Just because he can... by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      >>>However, we do need to invest in more infrastructure.

      I have faith that private companies will, for the sake of profit, provide faster cabling..... just as they always have. I started with a 1.2k modem and without any government assistance, but merely through the profit directive, I was able to jump to 9.6k, then 56k, next 700k, and now 10,000k.

      If government starts interfering, I'm afraid it will have the opposite effect of slowing things down. The last time government was involved, they granted a monopoly to AT&T and communications technology stagnated at 0.3k for nearly twenty years (1962 to 1980). It was only after government stepped-out of the way and allowed free competition, that the industry exploded, going from 0.3k to 14.4k in just ten years (1981 to 1991). And by 2000 many people were signing-up with 3000k broadband connections.

      Like I said, I'm afraid if government suddenly starts interfering, it will SLOW progress, not speed it up.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    28. Re:Just because he can... by sorak · · Score: 1

      >>>94% of all internet facts are made up on the spot.

      Except this one is verifiable:
      1988 - download of 880k floppy game over then-typical 2400 baud modem =~ 1 hour (from my own personal experience)
      2008 - download of 4000 megabyte game over typical 10 Mbit/s cable =~ 1 hour (math)

      Naturally the actual time will vary if your 1988 computer had a double-sized floppy (takes 2 hours) or if you are downloading a dual-sided DVD (also 2 hours). But Slashdot's signature length limit precludes me from including all that detail. The important point to note is that speeds have escalated to match demand. We have never experienced the so-called "speed limit" that certain Chicken Littles keep claiming we're going to hit. They are just blowing a lot of hot air, and have been doing so for almost 15 years now. Their claims have no merit.

      So are you saying that our system/network resource consumption will increase to match availability, or that we will never reach technical limitations and that all of the moore's law type observations will continue to infinity? I can agree with the first one, but not the second.

    29. Re:Just because he can... by sorak · · Score: 1

      Much like Trent Reznor and Radiohead, he's got tons of cash to play around with and experiment - cash made while riding the corporate engine. I'll subscribe to your theory when I see a brand new artist do the same thing and make a profit from it.

      If he ever does release another full album, I have a title for it.

      "Wierd Al: Much like Trent Reznor and Radiohead".

      Thank you Mordaximus!

    30. Re:Just because he can... by electrictroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >>>if he just picks two sizes that work out mathematically

      We're talking about a *general* concept, not precision. Even if we assume somebody's downloading the 4-floppy Space Ace game to their Commodore Amiga PC, which would require 4 hours at then-common 2400 baud rates, it's still close to how long a game download takes today. It's within an order of magnitude.

      This is in direct opposition to what many experts were saying in 1995. They claimed the internet had reached a natural speed-limit of 33k, and would not go any faster. Obviously they were wrong, but if their predictions had been accurate, then downloading a modern DVD game would require 270 hours (almost 12 days)!!!

      Clearly the so-called experts of 1995 were wrong.
      And I think Comcast's current prognostications of
      "running out of internet" are equally wrong. It's just a bunch of FUD.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    31. Re:Just because he can... by Pervaricator+General · · Score: 0

      Actually, most real numbers are derived from the introduction of division and root operators over the set of the integers.

    32. Re:Just because he can... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      The guy with the incredibly malformed <a href> link.

      No, that's not right. Jonathan Coulton has an awesome http, the best on teh tubes. I am JAFI has teh fail http. But meant well.

      Seriously (SRSLY), Jonathon Coulton rose to geek prominence with this distribution model. Weird Al doesn't need more prominence, but at least credit him with seeing the wisdom of Coulton's* model.

      *Yeah, Coulton didn't invent or pioneer this. He just made it visible, at least within the 'net community. Most "music consumers" have never heard of him, so obviously his inroads into RIAA's territory are minor. Maybe this will be Weird Al's place in the evolution of media sales and distribution.

      Signed,

      idontgno
      Yet Another Code Monkey

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    33. Re:Just because he can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speeds have escalated independently. It is only capacity that is increased to match demand. Video, graphic, and sound quality are limited by cost of bandwidth and media (DVDs).

    34. Re:Just because he can... by tholomyes · · Score: 1

      There was a big piece on him in the last issue of Wired, and this is spot on. He said that one of the troubles with parodying today's music market is you no longer have the icons like Michael Jackson or Madonna with hits that stay on the charts for months at a time. Instead, you have one the one hand people like Kevin Federline and Jessica Simpson, who are already kind of self-parodies, and on the other hand the biggest top forty hits only stay on the charts for a handful of weeks. This makes releasing a parody in a timely fashion a lot more important.

      --
      When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
    35. Re:Just because he can... by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      >>>So are you saying that our system/network resource consumption will increase to match availabilit

      ding ding ding! Yes that's my personal belief based on experience.

      .

      >>>or that we will never reach technical limitations and moore's law observations will continue to infinity?

      No not infinity, but I'm confident internet connections can keep-up with demand. I wouldn't be surprised to see the U.S. average connection increase from 10 megabit/s for 2008 to 500 megabit/s by the year 2020 (thanks to advances in technology). Which means a then-standard Bluray game could be downloaded in just half an hour.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    36. Re:Just because he can... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      To appreciate a parody you need to know the original.

      Call me sheltered (or, perhaps, "White and Nerdy"), but I totally grooved out on It's All About the Pentiums LOOONG before I heard of Sean Combs.

      It's probably more precise to say that Weird Al writes awesome songs that happen to be parodies, and are highly enjoyable on their own, but massively more so if you're in on the joke.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    37. Re:Just because he can... by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      P.S.

      >>>>>>So are you saying that our system/network resource consumption will increase to match availability

      One second thought, that's not what I meant. I believe that even as sizes of floppies, CDs, and DVDs have increased storage capacity with time, so too have connection speeds increased. The two have developed separately, but concurrently, and each has kept pace with the other.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    38. Re:Just because he can... by nolife · · Score: 1

      It may be mentioned already but "sticking it to the man" is not the main reason he is doing this.

      I caught an interview with him on a DC radio station a few months ago and he explained the situation. His parodies are based on popular songs. If the song is still fresh and popular, his parody has a better chance of being popular. Waiting a year or two to compile enough tracks to fill a typical CD is too long for the original to still be in everyones mind.

      I assume he probably knew this a long time ago but it wasn't until the last few years that making money off of individual tracks was possible.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    39. Re:Just because he can... by El+Yanqui · · Score: 1

      You can appreciate the song, you can rock out to it and groove even. But you can't appreciate the parody without knowing what it is parodying.

      --
      Well, thanks to the Internet, I'm now bored with sex.
    40. Re:Just because he can... by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      I completely disagree, particularly when we are talking about Weird Al.

      Fun fact: the only song he has ever written that directly apes the source material is "Smells Like Nirvana". All the rest of his songs deal with topics that are unrelated to the source material (and largely deal with food, a subject to which everyone can relate.) I have never heard the source for "White and Nerdy", but I'll be damned if I need to appreciate it to dig his send-up. Does "Safety Dance" have anything to do with "The Brady Bunch" or vice/versa? No.

      I said good day, sir!

    41. Re:Just because he can... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Or as I prefer:

      2008 - download of 4000 1mb games over typical cable =~ 1 hour

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    42. Re:Just because he can... by theskunkmonkey · · Score: 1

      Things like access to studio time, recording engineers, marketing, and most importantly, the up-front money to give the artists the time they need to create the tracks.

      With today's technology it's not that hard to eliminate the need to pay large sums of money for studio time and the engineers to make it work. With a good PC, someone with a good ear, and an artist that actually has talent (Hell, who am I kidding, these days you don't even need that!) it's not hard to a produce quality product.

      Most tripe put out these days that's done in a fancy, over-priced studio is usually so over processed it sounds nothing like the actual artist. This is how you end up with no talent "artists" putting out albums that end up having to lip-sync in concert because reality doesn't match the fantasy recording.

    43. Re:Just because he can... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There claims do have merit, and in fact have been true.
      The technology changes.
      There is a limit you can send over twisted pair.
      There is a limit to what can be sent over fiber.
      There is a limit on how small you can make a transistor.
      For example:
      The claim that there is a min. size of disk is true for a given type of production technology.
      When the production technology changes, then so does the limit.

      Your 'verification' you list is anecdotal at best, confirmation bias as worst.

      "TRIVIA - In both 1988 and 2008 it took ~1 hour to download a game. "

      I mean, that statement is just logically stupid on many levels.
      1) Personal reference
      2) self selected data set
      3) You seem to think 2400 bits = 2400 baud.
      4) you give no average sizes. You give a large game for 1988 and a tiny game for 2008.
      5) you base 'internet speed' with what you can
      get. You need to base this on some reasonable sized data sample.

      In short, you are really, really wrong.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    44. Re:Just because he can... by danwesnor · · Score: 1

      Except that the typical 10MB cable connection usually only gets you 5MB. Mine tops out at 3MB.

    45. Re:Just because he can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Imogen Heap? Last I knew, she did her own producing.

      Yes, she did produce Speak For Yourself by herself, but that's not her first album.
      Also when she was done producing it all by herself, she handed it to Sony to distribute it, so we still lose in the end.

    46. Re:Just because he can... by Glyphstream · · Score: 1

      Only 5% of people actually give a damn.

      --
      Sig unrelated.
    47. Re:Just because he can... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Angsty chick music. Like Kate Bush but without the vocal power or nerdy topics.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    48. Re:Just because he can... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      He's releasing on iTunes. Not really an avoidance of corporate engines. In fact, I believe it was Weird Al who stated a few years ago that he makes less money through iTunes than through traditional distribution channels.

      Besides, saying that established artists can be independent from usual business models leaves out that they relied on that business model beforehand to raise them to the position they're at now. Radiohead and NIN weren't releasing their music for free 10 years ago when they still needed the money. It's sort of like an anarchist using a computer and internet connection to rant against capitalism. Capitalists made the computers and software that are allowing the anarchist to rant in the first place.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    49. Re:Just because he can... by CynicalTyler · · Score: 1

      www.jonathancoulton.com

    50. Re:Just because he can... by mwlewis · · Score: 1

      No they aren't. Most real numbers can't be derived that way.

      --
      JOIN US FOR PONG!
    51. Re:Just because he can... by Lazyrust · · Score: 0

      And 5/4 people have problems with fractions.

    52. Re:Just because he can... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      That's enough lip from the Green Lantern, thanks.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    53. Re:Just because he can... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      I've actually argued that most of Weird Al's songs are not parodies. They are satire, of course, and 'send up', and very funny and mocking.

      But very very few of them are actually parodies of the original song, with 'Smells Like Nirvana' being the only exception I can think of, although I'm almost certain I've heard at least one other.

      In fact, the most 'parodyish' songs he does are his original songs, like his totally absurd love songs, which are parodies of the whole genre of love songs, and 'Don't Download This Song', which is a parody of 'charity' songs, the best example being 'We Are the World'.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    54. Re:Just because he can... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Of course, speaking of Weird Al, at this point he honestly doesn't give a crap about the money. He's never going to starve, and, frankly, he could have retired a decade ago. I think he's just going to keep doing this until he get tired of it.

      He's gone on record as stating that his only problem with p2p file sharing of his music isn't that he doesn't make any money from it, it's that non-PG material keeps being falsely attributed to him on it, because he tries to keep his music very clean.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    55. Re:Just because he can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You apparently missed the point of the "who?" comment.

    56. Re:Just because he can... by mordred99 · · Score: 1

      89% of the people are reading this just for the hell of it. Maybe 12% because they have a sense of humor and need to smile in their otherwise dreary day at work. Anyways .. 100% of the people who have already posted .. were human (I just made that one up ;) See some made up statistics can be true as well. (sorry the monkeys and Shakespeare theorists - we have not had infinite time.)

    57. Re:Just because he can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The war is fought on two fronts:

      1) Becoming well known without them
      2) Getting rid of them after becoming well known.

      Once we have both ...that's checkmate, game over.

      Examples of #2 happening is always great news.

      I'll subscribe to your theory when I see a brand new artist do the same thing and make a profit from it.

      By that point it wont be a theory anymore.

    58. Re:Just because he can... by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      That would actually only apply to poorly-written parodies, that don't make sense without the original work to give it context. Weird Al is not in that class, his parodies stand entirely on their own and do not require explanation from another source.

    59. Re:Just because he can... by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah: that's what I said, but avoided the use of "satire" and "parody" lest the pundits catch me unawares ;).

      Chances are really good that the "one other" you think you've heard is something by someone else (item number one on his FAQ) -- Al has said that his biggest fear about downloading music is that people will (intentionally or not) label their works as his, and it'll spread through the p2pnets and people will attribute to him what is not actually his. A quick litmus test is if the song is not "family friendly". All of his songs (satire or parody) are a strong G or a mild PG. No drug discussion, no frank sex discussion, etc. It's a pretty well established thing that the Nirvana song is the only song where he directly satires the original work.

      Lastly, if you keep reading down that FAQ, he sorta kinda refers to the songs he doesn't write himself as parodies, so that uh, sorta invalidates your arguement.

      Satire is MAD magazine, parody is ... Weird Al.

    60. Re:Just because he can... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but in 1988 I was still using a 300 baud modem with no autodialer. 1200 bps was a fantasy that finally came true in 1989 for the low, low price of $249. 2400 bps (or better) arrived for the masses in early 1992.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    61. Re:Just because he can... by Prosthetic_Lips · · Score: 1

      Here's the real catch: If you have never heard "Ridin' Dirty" and you love "White and Nerdy," do yourself a favor and spend a little time listening to the original ... then listen to WAY's version -- he bases so much on the original, using similar phrases and rhymes, that you will be amazed all over again.

      Do you have to hear the original to appreciate the parody? No. However, the real craft that WAY brings to the table (that other parodists miss) is getting very very close to the original, either in sound (timing, instrumentation, etc.) or wording (e.g. words that rhyme with the original words).

      Try it, try it, you will see, you will like it, yes, indeed!

    62. Re:Just because he can... by Pervaricator+General · · Score: 0

      I meant Z is closed under addition, subtraction and multiplication. R is closed under division. C is closed under fractional exponents. In other words, "Yes they are :P"

    63. Re:Just because he can... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Coulton is best known for his song "Code Monkey", which later became the theme song for a cartoon show on G4. I also highly recommend his remake of Sir Mix-A-Lot's "Baby Got Back", especially if you like the concept of Weird Al's polkas (but this one's definitely not a polka).

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    64. Re:Just because he can... by chaodyn · · Score: 1

      Amen to that - I literally forgot the original article was about Weird Al...

    65. Re:Just because he can... by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

      like saul williams?

      well, he did get some help from Trent Reznor, but still, hes independent making a good living off his music.

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    66. Re:Just because he can... by mwlewis · · Score: 1

      The problem with your argument is that you're ignoring most of the real numbers.

      --
      JOIN US FOR PONG!
    67. Re:Just because he can... by chaodyn · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it Kurt Cobain who said that they felt like Nirvana had finally "made it" when Weird Al did Smells Like Nirvana? I think when Al was asking permission, Kurt also said something like "Yes. Wait, it's not going to be about food, is it?"

    68. Re:Just because he can... by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      Haven't seen the latter part of your statement, but I think all three of them are on record re: the first part. Having said that, the latter part of your statement definitely sounds like something Cobain would say. Of course, he'd also say "barglenarglenarwr."

    69. Re:Just because he can... by Zephyn · · Score: 1

      They say 3% of the people use 5-6% of their brain.
      97% use just 3%, and the rest goes down the drain.
      I will never know which one I am.
      But I bet you my last dime
      99% think we're "3%", 100% of the time.

      They say 72% of all statistics are made up right there on the spot.
      84.4% of people believe them whether they're accurate statistics or not.
      Now I will never know what you believe
      But I do know there's no doubt:
      I need another double shot of something 90 proof,
      this is too much to think about.

      Todd Snyder - "Statistician's Blues"

    70. Re:Just because he can... by Pervaricator+General · · Score: 0

      So what you are saying is that since most "real numbers" are uncountable in the first place, math provides an out for Intelligent Design. You Deductive reasoners always were a tricksy lot... And they say Off Topic posts aren't constructive

    71. Re:Just because he can... by monktus · · Score: 1

      Weird who? My ADSL gets 40 rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it.

      --
      Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals... except the weasel."
    72. Re:Just because he can... by mwlewis · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pretty sure I didn't mention anything about ID. I can't imagine that math has anything to say, for or against it. I just like to point out when people are wrong. :)

      --
      JOIN US FOR PONG!
    73. Re:Just because he can... by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 1
    74. Re:Just because he can... by m50d · · Score: 1
      2008 - download of 4000 megabyte game over typical 10 Mbit/s cable =~ 1 hour (math)2008 - download of 4000 megabyte game over typical 10 Mbit/s cable =~ 1 hour (math)

      10MB/s is typical now? And you can actually use it to download a game at this speed? What country are you in?

      --
      I am trolling
    75. Re:Just because he can... by profplump · · Score: 1

      In general 2400 baud *is* the same as 2400 bps on old modems -- the applicational-level transfer protocol you use might introduce error correction and/or compression, but the actual symbol rate (baud) is generally the same as the gross bit rate on old-school modems.

    76. Re:Just because he can... by spacebird · · Score: 1

      Perhaps... Jonathan Coulton? He recently stated that he is now making more money off his music annually than he did working as a software engineer.

      --
      What, me? Never.
    77. Re:Just because he can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the economy is fundamentally strong

    78. Re:Just because he can... by Pervaricator+General · · Score: 0

      Sorry, obtuse un-cited reference to post which started this whole shebang. Thanks for enlightening me, but you realize that correcting me makes you no better than the Grammar Police, don't you?

    79. Re:Just because he can... by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      You mean like this guy: http://blog.wired.com/underwire/2007/12/journeys-replac.html ?

      If that isn't cutting out the middleman, then I don't know what is. He didn't have megabucks, whether from riding the corporate engine or otherwise.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    80. Re:Just because he can... by mwlewis · · Score: 1

      It's similar to grammar police, but math police are much better.

      --
      JOIN US FOR PONG!
    81. Re:Just because he can... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      2008 - download of 4000 megabyte game over typical 10 Mbit/s cable =~ 1 hour (math)
      I have a few issues with this claim.

      1: most domestic connections are highly asymetric, so you can only achive that speed if either you have a lot of sources at once or if downloading from a proffesionally hosted server.
      2: Throttling/shaping/congestion issues mean that current domestic connections (especially the ones with high headline rates) rarely sustain thier headline rates for very long in my experiance.
      3: I would hardly call 10MBps a typical connection. Hell there are many places that still only have dialup.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    82. Re:Just because he can... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Umm with normal RS-232 serial links there is quite a lot of overhead. For every 8 data bits there is a start bit, one or two stop bits and possiblly a parity bit as well. So somewhere between a fith and a third of your baud rate is getting taken up simply by byte framing overhead.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    83. Re:Just because he can... by snoogans126 · · Score: 1

      I agree totally, when I got "Straight Outta Lynwood", it made me feel kind of old when I only recognized 1/2 the songs from Polkarama! (The traditional polka medley). I felt even older when I read the liner notes and found out that like 3 songs that I thought were originals were parodies.

    84. Re:Just because he can... by aztektum · · Score: 1

      There are artists out there are making a profit off music w/o the labels. The general public doesn't notice because they're too busy listening to the crap the labels do produce.

      By the way, it's been going on since before the glory days of the internet too.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    85. Re:Just because he can... by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      Wait I thought that was The Offspring who said that

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    86. Re:Just because he can... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      well, fiber optics are pretty awesome, the advances in the field of fiber optics is frankly amazing. the drive for increasing network bandwidth are deeper, though. the telephone industry was rapidly expanding thanks to dial up modems, and there was this big huge copper shortage they were looking at, so they starting investing heavily into research on how they could 'fix' the problem for once and for all, and the solution was to dig up and recycle the POTS lines built on analog telephone networks and recycle them, and replace them with high speed fiber optic data networks. based on cheap, glass fiber technology. although eventually they figured out ways to use more flexible materials.

      the same technology advances that led to the compact disc lead to fiber optic technology, and once fiber optics got started, they figured out how to double the capacity of lines over and over again and again. this is how 'unlimited' long distance became affordable, and how the internet avoided complete collapse.

      but it costs money to lay fiber optics, and there needs to be a revenue stream to cover those costs. downloading content for free, using peer to peer technologies doesn't provide a revenue stream to roll out huge data networks. so there is a problem with the way technology has advanced, and why it advanced in the first place.

      bandwidth sucking applications like steam help cover the costs of the networks because they have to pay for their upload, but some warez torrents of the same games put heavy load on the network, without a revenue stream other than 'consumer broadband subscribers' and consumers are the first to balk at high prices.

    87. Re:Just because he can... by Pervaricator+General · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, we are least upper bounded by Star Trek Background Police. HEYO!!!!

    88. Re:Just because he can... by El+Yanqui · · Score: 1

      No, a parody is only a parody if you know what it is parodying. Something can still be funny; it can still stand as a good song or an amusing piss-take but if you don't know what it is parodying how can you say it is a good parody?

      I'm not disagreeing that his songs can stand alone and be funny. But if you don't know Michael Jackson made a song called 'Beat It', how can you say that 'Eat It' is a good parody?

      --
      Well, thanks to the Internet, I'm now bored with sex.
    89. Re:Just because he can... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      No, I'm aware that a lot of 'Weird Al' songs aren't his. I actually mentioned that somewhere else on this thread.

      That doesn't change the fact that I heard some other parody song by him, and I actually just remember what it was. 'That Achy-Breaky Song', which is a song about how annoying 'Achy-Break Heart' is. And now that I've remember that song, I think I can recall another parody song also.

      And, yeah, I know he calls all his 'non-original music' songs parodies, but that doesn't make them so. They don't contain any of the original words, or at least not enough to be derivative, so aren't parodies of that, and they contain the exact same music, so that's not a parody either.

      You could theoretically argue the piece as a whole is a parody, but I can't figure out in what legal sense that would even apply. It's sorta like redubbing a movie with random speech to make it about something else entirely. Yeah, it's funny, but not a parody.

      Arguably, though, his polka sets are parody. I bet, legally, he could, and maybe does, get away without paying for the words in those. Maybe even all of Bohemia Polka, but maybe not.

      Oh, and many of his music videos are straight up, scene for scene, parodies of the original video, which a changed topic. (I'm still upset that 'Smell Like Nirvana' had a few bars missing from the middle, because until that part you could play both music videos simultaneously and have identical scenes in each.)

      But I still say that, ironically, almost all the 'parodies' that Weird Al does are the songs that people think aren't parodies, the genre parodies, like 'Do I Creep You Out' and 'Don't Download This Song'.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    90. Re:Just because he can... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Let me rephrase, for greater clarity:

      Radio stations don't like to play Weird Al that much, because the percentage of their listeners who *upon hearing it* are actually into it, isn't high enough. Weird Al appeals to a certain kind of listener, and it's not the kind of listener most radio stations cultivate. So he doesn't get much air time.

      But people who do like him actually *like* him, so he gets good word-of-mouth response, and has developed a substantial following.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    91. Re:Just because he can... by caldodge · · Score: 1

      > Fun fact: the only song he has ever written that directly apes the source material is "Smells Like Nirvana".
      That's not true.
      "Achy Breaky Song" is a complaint about "Achy Breaky Heart", and "This Song is (Just) Six Words Long" is obviously poking fun at "I've Got My Mind Set On You" ("This song has got plenty of music, but just six words child. And so I'll sing them over, and over and over and over, etc.")

    92. Re:Just because he can... by caldodge · · Score: 1

      Uhh... it's "Bargle Nawdle Zauss"
      Don't you young whippersnappers know ANYTHING? (time for me to start singing "When I Was Your Age")

    93. Re:Just because he can... by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, was too busy enjoying the source material at the time ;).
      I seem to be one of those people that even though I damn sure can't understand what you're saying, if you sing it -- I can understand it.
      I understood Cobain's words the third time I heard them, if not the second; I can understand what Bjork sings (unless she sings in Icelandic).
      It probably comes from all the Cocteau Twins I listened to back in the ... mid- to late- 80s.

      How old are you, grampa who listens to Nirvana :P.

    94. Re:Just because he can... by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      I concur with your writing and stand corrected.

    95. Re:Just because he can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, later on someone in this same thread points out "This Song Is Just Six Words Long," so I'll concede.

      I seem to recall having read something about his polkas in this context as far as parodies and how he works the permission/ royalty games: if I'm not mistaken the beginning and end part are copywritten as a body of work containing excerpts or some legal acrobatics along those lines.

    96. Re:Just because he can... by FoboldFKY · · Score: 1

      No... no, I really can't. Hence the bit about Telstra having to upgrade their infrastructure in the area.

      It doesn't matter what plans are available if the lines and exchange are physically unable to support them.

      Let me give you some perspective: my parents live in the Northern Territory. They bought a block on a brand new estate. The exchange is listed by Telstra as "ADSL enabled."

      Sadly, although the network is capable of supporting ADSL to that exchange, the exchange itself is unable to support it. Add to this that Telstra have basically put everyone on the estate on to a single copper line thus ensuring that no one can even get a reliable dialup connection.

      I had to move a year ago to where I am now from literally 200 meters up the road just to get off dialup.

      Never, ever believe anything Telstra says about broadband penetration in Australia; it's a complete crock of shit. Those plan listings are a best-case scenario that in my experience rarely plays out.

      --
      We're geeks... We're the sorcerers of the modern-day world. --
    97. Re:Just because he can... by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      It's only a bunch of fud because people keep finding solutions to these limit problems.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  2. Probably will be great for him by sokoban · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess now by doing this he can have a parody in the hands of his fans while the original version of the song is still popular. If you're trying to lampoon popular culture, releasing an album at a time means that you will always be a good deal behind the times.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    1. Re:Probably will be great for him by DynaSoar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess now by doing this he can have a parody in the hands of his fans while the original version of the song is still popular. If you're trying to lampoon popular culture, releasing an album at a time means that you will always be a good deal behind the times.

      That's not as good an idea as you might imagine. I do the same thing -- parody songs. Popular != well known. Older means more people have become familiar with it, particularly those who don't keep current on the genre the song is from. If fewer people recognize it, the act falls flat. I'll bet Weird Al is aware of this since he typically runs years behind a "hit" despite producing things in the interim. Plus, if he seeks permission (he used to sometimes) it'd be easier to get when something's no longer hot. Very new, and they won't want it made fun of. Older, and the parody can bring the original back up the chart.

      --
      "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    2. Re:Probably will be great for him by sukotto · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough. I still enjoy his parodies long after the original song has dropped out of sight. Let's remember too that only about half of his work is parody. The other half is 100% his own work.

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    3. Re:Probably will be great for him by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Weird Al parodies of Michael Jackson music: funny and still relatively popular
      Michael Jackson music: largely a joke now.

      Weird Al also (as others have pointed out) has been known to parody stuff from a decade or 2 earlier: e.g. Grapefruit Diet (Zoot Suit Riot) or The Saga Begins (American Pie).

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:Probably will be great for him by Dorkmaster+Flek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Plus, if he seeks permission (he used to sometimes) it'd be easier to get when something's no longer hot. Very new, and they won't want it made fun of. Older, and the parody can bring the original back up the chart.

      That's an interesting point, but he isn't going to run out of available material to parody any time soon. And as far as I'm aware, he always asks permission from the artist before doing a parody of their song, even though legally he doesn't have to. I've always respected that about his work.

      --
      I like to think of online DRM as something akin to a college -- you pay for lessons until you learn something.
    5. Re:Probably will be great for him by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      he does, however when he is told no he still does it anyway, which i applaud

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    6. Re:Probably will be great for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, if he seeks permission (he used to sometimes)

      Last I heard he gets permission for every single song. He recently wanted to parody an Eminem "song" but Eminem turned him down, so he didn't do the parody. Shows you how classy Al is, and how big of a D-bag Eminem is. HONOZ someone is going to make fun of my precious work of art rap song about how i raped my mom to death and strangled my girlfriend and how i love mah daughter so much plz stop thems.

    7. Re:Probably will be great for him by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Weird Al parodies of Michael Jackson music: funny and still relatively popular Michael Jackson music: largely a joke now.

      Imagine if you tried to predict that 20 or so years ago.

    8. Re:Probably will be great for him by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      I guess now by doing this he can have a parody in the hands of his fans while the original version of the song is still popular. If you're trying to lampoon popular culture, releasing an album at a time means that you will always be a good deal behind the times.

      That's not as good an idea as you might imagine. I do the same thing -- parody songs. Popular != well known. Older means more people have become familiar with it, particularly those who don't keep current on the genre the song is from. If fewer people recognize it, the act falls flat. I'll bet Weird Al is aware of this since he typically runs years behind a "hit" despite producing things in the interim. Plus, if he seeks permission (he used to sometimes) it'd be easier to get when something's no longer hot. Very new, and they won't want it made fun of. Older, and the parody can bring the original back up the chart.

      And, obviously, this is why DynaSoar is now a household name. :p

      In all seriousness though, look at South Park. Sometimes they parody pop culture and the news the week after something becomes huge/mainstreamed. Part of its current success is that people can watch a new episode and see what's currently going on in popular society lampooned.

      Of course, certain things need longer to sink in than others, but, lets take MIA's song Airplanes for example. It's still relevant and it's been around long enough for most people to have heard it at this point. This would be a great time for a parody. Next year a parody would come off as stale. This is great for Al, because he won't have to worry about putting out an album. He can work on a song at the Apex of its popularity and still put it out while it's relevant. I have to admit, I like jabs at older songs too, but this will really open the doors to what he can do. If anything, it might make HIM relevant again.

      Just think, in the near future we may have an artist put out a song, a weird 'al' parody shortly thereafter, and possibly an artist rebuttle all while the original song is still in the publics mind. Now that could be entertainment!

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    9. Re:Probably will be great for him by sorak · · Score: 1

      I guess now by doing this he can have a parody in the hands of his fans while the original version of the song is still popular. If you're trying to lampoon popular culture, releasing an album at a time means that you will always be a good deal behind the times.

      That's not as good an idea as you might imagine. I do the same thing -- parody songs. Popular != well known. Older means more people have become familiar with it, particularly those who don't keep current on the genre the song is from. If fewer people recognize it, the act falls flat. I'll bet Weird Al is aware of this since he typically runs years behind a "hit" despite producing things in the interim. Plus, if he seeks permission (he used to sometimes) it'd be easier to get when something's no longer hot. Very new, and they won't want it made fun of. Older, and the parody can bring the original back up the chart.

      And are people more receptive to parody once they have started to get bored of the original? (When they are in that area where they aren't sick of it, but don't really care either).

    10. Re:Probably will be great for him by residieu · · Score: 1

      Looking at his most recent album, I don't actually know any of the specific song parodies, and most of the style parodies I'm not that familiar with the bands. A shame that I can't appreciate his new work anymore.

    11. Re:Probably will be great for him by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Popular != well known."

      wha..?

      Lot's of people knowing about you doesn't equal well known?

      As my 8 year old daughter would say:
      "Cookoo!"

      Some of Weird Al's stuff is from year old songs, some is not.
      "My Bologna" came out while "My Sharona" was still being played, "Another one rides the bus" was out while Queens 'another one bites the dust' was out.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Probably will be great for him by drcagn · · Score: 1

      No, he doesn't. He's been trying to parody Prince for years, but Prince won't give him his blessing.

      The only song he did without permission was Amish Paradise, due to a misunderstanding.

      --
      Scorta futuere amo!
    13. Re:Probably will be great for him by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

      "Lot's of people knowing about you doesn't equal well known?"

      Popular == well liked. Popularity for music is measured by requests to radio stations, early sales primarily by fans of the genre, and listener ratings. It is usually a small subset of the population that accounts for such response. This is where Billboard gets its numbers. Popular has a positive connotation that's not applicable to things well known but not held in positive esteem. We have the word "infamous" for the extreme example.

      Well known == easily recognized by many. When people who aren't fans of the genre will recognize the song despite not particularly liking the song, it's well known. Queen's "We Will Rock You" at sporting events is an example. This is way past Billboard's figuring.

      No, they're not the same.

      "Another One Rides The Bus" is a good counter example to the usual delay. The Beverly Hillbillies theme to Dire Straights music is a better example of what I mean. One was very old, the other only old.

      As for permission, he usually does at least try. But I'm pretty sure he never asked Mark (Devo) Mothersbaugh's permission for "Dare To Be Stupid" and I know for certain he never asked Ivan Stang's permission to use the J.R. "Bob" Dobbs-like character in that video. He apparently knew enough to know Mark was a SubGenius preacher.

      --
      "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    14. Re:Probably will be great for him by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      As my 8 year old daughter would say:
      "Cookoo!"

      Wouldn't that be "Cuckoo!"?

    15. Re:Probably will be great for him by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "I've always respected that about his work."

      That is exactly why I don't.
      It sets bad expectations, and parody must be allowed without needing permissions. It would otherwise defeat the point.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    16. Re:Probably will be great for him by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      That is incorrect. As far as I can tell, he will not do a parody if he does not get permission. There are some acts/songs that he does in concert only, because the original artist only gave him that permission.

    17. Re:Probably will be great for him by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      Another interesting point: In many cases, I only prefer his parodies. Particularly, when they are of well done music that is impeded by atrocious lyrics. (Amish Paradise, among many others). Then again, there are some parodies I just can't get into, because I detested the original so much (The White Stuff). And I think I really like all of the Michael Jackson parodies better than the originals.

    18. Re:Probably will be great for him by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      You just restated the Weird Al post that this article is linking to. Instant +5!

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    19. Re:Probably will be great for him by Dorkmaster+Flek · · Score: 1

      That is incorrect. As far as I can tell, he will not do a parody if he does not get permission. There are some acts/songs that he does in concert only, because the original artist only gave him that permission.

      Yes, the most recent example of this was the parody "You're Pitiful" of the song "You're Beautiful". The artist gave him permission, but the suits at the label dicked him around on it, initially saying yes but then saying no at the last minute.

      --
      I like to think of online DRM as something akin to a college -- you pay for lessons until you learn something.
    20. Re:Probably will be great for him by NecroPuppy · · Score: 1

      "Dare to be Stupid" was a style parody.

      It was not a parody of a specific song, but rather a style (Devo and similar acts).

      As such, who would he ask?

      And why would he ask Ivan Stang for permission to use that Bob? Stang didn't invent that image; IIRC it was a printer test pattern originally. That Stang built something around it doesn't make it exclusively his.

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    21. Re:Probably will be great for him by Ajaxamander · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that "Don't Download this Song" was the first Weird Al original — *everything* previously was a parody of something/someone else.

    22. Re:Probably will be great for him by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Very new, and they won't want it made fun of.

      You sure? Kurt Cobain said that he knew they'd made it when Al wanted to parody Smells Like Teen Spirit. Most artists (if not always their labels) are pretty excited to have him do their songs.

      At any rate, he claims in the blog post that he's releasing a song next week that's a parody of the current #1 song (or possibly last week's #1, it's unclear), so he is clearly not worried about the pitfalls of parodying current hits and in fact seems quite excited about it.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    23. Re:Probably will be great for him by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      The recent album was pretty specifically hip hop-themed - given that it's a very prominent current genre, a smart move on his part to pull in new young listeners that paid off big with White & Nerdy. However, that doesn't mean that all of his future work will be based on hip hop, as there are plenty of other popular genres begging to be parodied. Hopefully this new release schedule will allow him to attack more strategically - though I wonder what he'll do with the non-parodies (which are usually my favorite songs!).

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    24. Re:Probably will be great for him by sukotto · · Score: 1

      He has four categories of music:

      • Parodies of popular songs
      • Original music in the style
      • Original music
      • Polka compilations of popular song melodies played on the accordion

      You can see the whole list here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_songs_by_%22Weird_Al%22_Yankovic

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    25. Re:Probably will be great for him by sukotto · · Score: 1

      crap, I meant to click "Continue editing" instead of "Submit" :-(

      That should read "Original music in the style of popular artists and/or genres"

      Also, Slashcode shouldn't force a cooldown period when you want to immediately reply to your own pst.... at least, not for the first response. Grrr.....

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    26. Re:Probably will be great for him by bograt · · Score: 1

      I'll bet Weird Al is aware of this

      If you RTFA, you'll see that what he wants to do is release the parody while the original is still number one.

    27. Re:Probably will be great for him by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that "Don't Download this Song" was the first Weird Al original -- *everything* previously was a parody of something/someone else.

      Examples to the contrary off the top of my head: When I Was Your Age, UHF, Mr. Frump in the Iron Lung. I could list more if you're not convinced...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    28. Re:Probably will be great for him by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      And so he released it as a free download instead. You can get it directly from his website.

    29. Re:Probably will be great for him by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      "I've always respected that about his work."

      That is exactly why I don't.
      It sets bad expectations, and parody must be allowed without needing permissions. It would otherwise defeat the point.

      Just because it's legally allowed doesn't mean it's polite. What point do you think is being defeated?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    30. Re:Probably will be great for him by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Where on his site? I don't see a download section

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    31. Re:Probably will be great for him by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      At the bottom of the main page. It's not a download section, it's a bunch of links in the YOU'RE PITIFUL paragraph.

  3. Oh Good by TornCityVenz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh what a relief...

    --
    I Need someone to rebuild a Digitech Digital Delay pedal for me....for me...for me...for me.
    1. Re:Oh Good by gsslay · · Score: 2, Funny

      I detect a touch of cynicism in your post.

      Do you not realise that this means that fans of food-based "parody" songs can get their hands on Weird Al's output while it's still lame, rather than waiting until it's lame and outdated? This could revolutionise Western culture as we know it.

      Only one question remains; how the hell is this news?

  4. Please tell me by edsousa · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Who the hell is this weird guy and why this is news anyway?

    1. Re:Please tell me by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Didn't you know? He's cowboyNeals sister who had a sex change.

    2. Re:Please tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they could be intimate partners in the method of their choosing.

      Tolerance people, tolerance.

    3. Re:Please tell me by citizen_senior · · Score: 0

      I didn't know - but I now have a question. Why am I not surprised ????

    4. Re:Please tell me by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      What the hell is someone who hasn't heard of Wikipedia doing on slashdot?

      Alfred Matthew "Weird Al" Yankovic (pronounced /jækvk/; born October 23, 1959) is a Grammy Award winning American singer, musician, actor, satirist, parodist, songwriter, music producer, accordionist, and television producer. Yankovic is known in particular for his humorous songs that make light of popular culture and that often parody specific songs by contemporary musical acts. Yankovic received his first accordion lesson a day before his seventh birthday. Since his first-aired song parody in 1979, he has sold more than 12 million albums - more than any other comedy act in history -[1] recorded more than 150 parody and original songs,[2][3][4] and has performed more than 1,000 live shows.[5] His works have earned him three Grammy Awards among nine nominations, four gold records, and six platinum records in the United States. Yankovic's first top ten Billboard album and single were both released in 2006, nearly three decades into his career.

      What rock have you been living under for the last thirty years? Many of his his songs are decidedly nerdy, which is why it's news for nerds, stuff that matters.

      And if you mistrust Wikipedia because of its alleged wrongness, the uncyclopedia has an entry on him too.

      "Dirty Deeds Done With Sheep..how did he know?" ~ Oscar Wilde on Weird Al Yankovic

      "I'm just too White and Nerdy" ~ Weird Al on Himself

      Weird Al Yankovic, AKA Accordion Jesus, or better known by his pseudonym "Alfred Matthew" Yankovic, was born in Siberia from a hole in the snow. He later became famous after Vladimir Putin listened to "Let's Bomb Iraq" and promoted him to Entertainer In Chief of the KGB at the tender age of 8. Yankovic later moved to America, following an invitation by Richard Nixon for tea, and a nice little record party. The Russians misinterpreted this act as treason, and Yankovic currently lives in exile as a wanted criminal of the Putin regime. If you have any information concerning Yankovic, please contact your local Russian consulate immediately. He is the son of King Alfred Yankovic VI.

    5. Re:Please tell me by edsousa · · Score: 1

      Let me see...
      1. By reading any article on Wikipedia about one guy does not mean that I will *know* the guy..
      2. I'm not living under a rock... Just on another rock that is not US..
      3. His songs are nerdy? Your opinion, but I think that nerdy is the CERN rap..
      4. The news here is Weird Al or an artist releasing songs as he records them? The first one is not news and the second one is not too. There are plenty of artists that release their songs on MySpace before album launch.

  5. "physical media" on the way out? by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If this catches on by the time albums are released most fans will already have all the tracks they want on their iPhones, mp3 players, etc.

    It might not be too long before the physical album is like the TV series collectors sets - you only get them if you want the nice boxes and "official" stamp.

    1. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MP3 players ARE the physical media!

      --
      Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
      For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
    2. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think my kids (2 and 4 now) will find the whole notion of physical media for consumable media ridiculous.

      Once (hopeful here) this silly DRM thing is over and prices are low enough for piracy to be less attractive physical media will simply become impractical.

      Sure, there will always be the collectors who keep stuff for whatever reason, but most people are only after the music/video/whatever...

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    3. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm afraid you are completely missing what is happening to the music industry.

      DRM was never about catching piracy, it was about extracting more money from those who legally pay for their media. Fortunately, DRM appears to be dying a death but the media companies still want to make more profits from those people who do pay for the stuff.

      The fact is that downloadable music, legal or illegal, is turning music into a disposable commodity - i.e. once your iPod fills up, wipe it and start again. And because of that, there will no longer be the *need* to make albums that people are likely to listen to for their entire lives.

      Look at modern pop music and you will see endless clone artists, no matter what the genre, that are thrown into the limelight for eighteen months or so just to churn out cheap-to-make music - as soon as these same artists get beligerent and demand more money, they disappear, with a new cheaper "clone" put in place.

      For the record labels its great - no arrogant mega-stars to deal with, just churn out plastic dross that's cheap to make but makes loads of profits. This is why a lot of youngsters these days have a perception that albums only have one or two good tracks on them - because that is actually the case for the trash that's forced on them by advertising.

      So I actually feel sorry for your kids - because when they get to an age where they can start to appreciate music, there will be no "classic" albums that will come out of their generation, just "pick 'n' mix" music.

    4. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by grub · · Score: 1


      I think my kids (2 and 4 now) will find the whole notion of physical media for consumable media ridiculous.

      Yep. My daughter is 2 and I can imagine the future conversation going "Back in my day we used to have to out in the winter to a store to buy plastic discs with music on them"

      While I'm at it:
      - My youngest brother doesn't own a CD player and has gone through a few iPods in his time.
      - My own 50 CD jukebox was never installed on our new AV rack 3 years ago yet I still buy the odd CD to support the band or have the liner notes. The past few years of CDs I bought have never been spun.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    5. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's "winter", daddy?

    6. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by grub · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha! Very good. :)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    7. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And because of that, there will no longer be the *need* to make albums that people are likely to listen to for their entire lives.

      I sincerely hope you're wrong. Some of my favorite music is stuff I hated as a kid (John Lee Hooker, Little Walter, old jazz from the '30s and '40s), some of the stuff I hated as a kid I hate even more (the Archies, most of the Beach Boys), and most of the stuff I loved as an older teen and young adult I still love (Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Beatles, Van Halen, Ted Nugent).

      I fear you may be right, however. The only band formed this century I'd even consider paying for is Buckcherry.

      I've bought a lot of CDs from local bands, however. Most of the stuff I like these days they don't play on the radio. Perhaps it's because Clearchannel bought out all the stations?

      This is why a lot of youngsters these days have a perception that albums only have one or two good tracks on them - because that is actually the case for the trash that's forced on them by advertising.

      It was always pretty much that way. I was seventeen in sixty nine, and learned early to NEVER buy an album on the basis of a song on the radio. I'd buy "best of", "greatest hits", and live albums because I knew that there would usually be an album full of good stuff, whereas if I bought an album because of one song, I was lucky if it had two good songs.

    8. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by onosson · · Score: 1

      What makes an album the be-all and end-all of music listening? Albums have only existed for less than a century, while songs and music have existed for many millenia. I am a professional musician (for 20 years), and have many, many favourite albums, but I'm not sure the death of the album is all that much to cry about.

      --
      ? syntax error
    9. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "The only band formed this century I'd even consider paying for is Buckcherry."

      That's just a sign that you are old.

      Yeah, very few albums were actually works.
      Rush, BOC, Zep, Eminem, to name a few.

      But I thing people who want to create an actual work, will still do so. In fact, they can create longer and more varies works using the digital medium then they ever could with an album.

      They caught on the the 'on;y buy the greatest hits trick a few years ago, and now they will release a greatest hits with only half of the good stuff, and then come out with an greatest hits album II.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by jridley · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they will. I'm 44 and I do. I don't buy media on physical medium unless I don't have a choice or there's a good reason.
      Al's albums often have bonuses - Right offhand, Straight Outta Lynwood was a flipper, the other side was a DVD with videos from the album. Definitely worth the $13 I spent for it. But if I'm just getting the music, I'll skip the disc TYVM. It just gets ripped to the server and put in a box in the basement for years anyway.

      BTW, currently the reason I buy real CDs is that they have no DRM that isn't trivial to overcome. If I could go out and buy FLAC tracks for the same price, I'd rather do that.

    11. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Bullocks!

      Bands, singers, musicians, and whatnot have been releasing "albums" that consist of one or two decent songs, and a remainder of utter crap, since long before digital music ever caught on. It's not the fault of Apple or iTunes, It's the "artists" themselves who get lazy, or who were never as creative as they sold themselves in the first place.

      I don't know when the term "one hit wonder" was coined. But I do remember hearing it when I was just a wee tyke learning to program on the Apple ][+.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    12. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      DRM was never about catching piracy, it was about extracting more money from those who legally pay for their media. Fortunately, DRM appears to be dying a death but the media companies still want to make more profits from those people who do pay for the stuff.

      I love when pirates invent these wild conspiracies with absolutely no evidence to back them up. DRM was obviously a response to Napster and the ease of pirating copyrighted materials. In fact, for many years, the record industry was mocked for its slow response to the threat of internet piracy.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    13. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Damn McGrew, you are as old as my dad! o_O

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    14. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "So I actually feel sorry for your kids - because when they get to an age where they can start to appreciate music, there will be no "classic" albums that will come out of their generation, just "pick 'n' mix" music."

      "Hits's'shit" was most of what was out there back in the day too, except ya had to buy the vinyl album to get the good stuff. That's why (along with perishable vinyl media) we ripped to reel-to-reel ("server") and Compact Cassette (portable) before PCs existed.

      Any artist who wants to do AOR can do that, and make money by touring if they are worth a shit. The Grateful Dead pulled it off for decades, and even encouraged taping from their soundboard!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    15. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In fact, they can create longer and more varies works using the digital medium then they ever could with an album.

      Well, not really, but with CDs you don't have to turn it over and change albums. The Wall will fit on one CD, for instance, instead of two 2 sided albums. You don't have to turn Thick As A Brick over.

      That's just a sign that you are old.

      It's a sign that the young are clueless. Where are your John Lee Hookers? Your Chuck Berrys? Your Led Zeppelins? Your Pink Floyds? Your Matallicas and Megadeaths and Poisons? Your Nirvanas and Tools and Alice In Chains? There was great rock and roll for half a century, all my life in fact (I was an infant when Alan Freed coined the term), and it got better every decade until this pathetic decade came along and Clear Channel killed it.

      You youngsters have the internet and all you can come up with is commercial jingles and Emo. WTF?? You have the greatest tool for making audio art the world has ever seen and you waste it!

    16. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Possibly older. But that's ok, you can sit on my lawn. Just don't knock over the bong or spill the beer or bother the hookers, okay? Now whose turn is it to cut the cards?

    17. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      Your kids will also have no notion of what a good recording sounds like. Before it's been compressed, I mean Optimized, for iPod.

    18. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by unity100 · · Score: 1

      You youngsters have the internet and all you can come up with is commercial jingles and Emo. WTF??

      dont go hard on them.

      the 'F' here is that, these times are no 69s anymore. pace of life picked up greatly since 80s. it is a much more competitive, tough and hardworking world. kids are being put to compete (and rightfully so because of living conditions in each country) right from junior grades so they can get a footing in life later. even when you graduate college, its still more hard work for less pay for the same work you people did back in 60s. its like that in every country. world has 7 billion+ population now, with more coming.

      these times ARE emo. emo music just lets kids to unleash their feelings about the times they live in. as much as rock'n roll was a flag of rebellion against conformism, emo is a burst out in response to the unbelievably pressurizing and stressful life of 2000s.

    19. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pop music has been full of one-hit-wonders for as long as it's been around. The continual rotation is a large part of what makes pop music what it is.

      If you want albums that may stand the test of time, you'll have to look at other genres. Quality sound is still being made, you just won't find it on MTV.

    20. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      Yep, indeed... I hear myself going: "Welcome to Fingland, where the summers are wet and cold, and the winters are wetter and colder..." lately.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    21. Re: "physical media" on the way out? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      I think it's the opposite: Digital distribution makes it possible to cheaply have both a compressed-to-hell mp3 and a FLAC with proper dynamic range. With a CD it's one or the other.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  6. Yay! by i_liek_turtles · · Score: 5, Funny

    I now feel like I'm livin' in a Slashdot paradise.

    1. Re:Yay! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I now feel like I'm livin' in a Slashdot paradise.

      Yeah, well I've spent all my *life* livin' in a Slashdot paradise.

      (Err, okay, perhaps not *all* my life...)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    2. Re:Yay! by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's party like it's 2099!

    3. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe true. But there are quite a few here who,
      ""
      Dare to be Stupid.

      Sorry - obligatory.

    4. Re:Yay! by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      But you're not livin' the High Life.

    5. Re:Yay! by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

      It's all about the Pentiums, baby...

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    6. Re:Yay! by prozaker · · Score: 1

      and being white and nerdy

    7. Re:Yay! by kesuki · · Score: 1

      "Let's party like it's 2038!"

      There, fixed that for you!

    8. Re:Yay! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Song: Amish Paradise

      From Wikipedia:
      The line "Tonight we're gonna party like it's 1699," is a parody of Prince's "1999." Prince has consistently refused to let "Weird Al" parody his songs.

      I changed 1699 to 2099. I guess it should have been 2399 to copy the difference of three centuries, but anyway.

      I don't think programmers will have much time to party in 2038. It's gonna be Y2K all over again, possibly much worst.

    9. Re:Yay! by kesuki · · Score: 1

      "I don't think programmers will have much time to party in 2038. It's gonna be Y2K all over again, possibly much worst."

      that was the point, all 32-bit time_t calls will go to negative numbers on jan 19th 2038. as far as partying, some people have a living to make, testing and confirming that large complex computer systems won't fail on jan 19th 2038 will give quite a few techies quite a bit of work.

      i guess it all depends on if you have a salaried position, or if you wind up being called in as a consultant to 'fix' somebody elses problem, on if you'll be celebrating 2038, or not.

      AOL apparently already ran into a 2038 bug because they were going forward a billion seconds in time for a certain value, which hit them unexpectedly in 2006.

  7. Re:first post by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    I guess slashdotters have been able to post first posts as soon as they type them for some time now.

    Anyhow, WHY isn't this under Idle???? (Says me, who was interested in 3 stories earlier today and all of them where under Idle.)

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  8. Uppercase name? by I+cant+believe+its+n · · Score: 5, Funny

    Use a font with serifs. After all, who wants to hear about some weird artificial intelligence creating music?

    --
    She made the willows dance
    1. Re:Uppercase name? by I+cant+believe+its+n · · Score: 1

      (I for one would welcome our weird artificial music creating overlords - but other HUMANS might feel offended...)

      --
      She made the willows dance
    2. Re:Uppercase name? by physman_wiu · · Score: 1

      Mod this one up guys. At least I'll say that while I'm still laughing.

      --
      Physics is imagination in a straight jacket. ~John Moffat
  9. I'd like to see more move to this trend by Uther2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wish more "One-Hit-Wonder" groups/artists would do this, as well as many of the better groups/artists out there today.

    --
    "You were expecting something witty here ?"
    1. Re:I'd like to see more move to this trend by OSXCPA · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, but the trick is, do bands truly know the filler/crap on their albums from the good stuff? Some do - but they are the ones most likely to toss garbage instead of publish it. A struggling band that happens on a hit might not be so good at editing. Think about it - Band X puts out a single. It sucks. Repeat (cause distribution costs are so low on the net). Second song sucks. Repeat. If the 'hit' follows a bunch of garbage, who is paying attention any more? One of the few things record companies (SOMETIMES) did right when managing artists was help them edit and find 'the single'.
      I do agree with your point that it would be nice to have the choice of just cherry picking the good stuff, though.

    2. Re:I'd like to see more move to this trend by edittard · · Score: 1

      Band X puts out a single.

      Ah, the days of 78 rpm...

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    3. Re:I'd like to see more move to this trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - many of these bands have that one song everyone's heard on the radio and thinks is awesome. So, the CD has that song and a whole bunch of other ones on it that end up being shit. You're essentially paying $12.99 for one song.

    4. Re:I'd like to see more move to this trend by Reziac · · Score: 1

      But if there's any talent in the dross, maybe someone will pick it up, rework/cover the song, and release it -- which means the band gets both a royalty and a lesson in how they SHOULD have handled that tune.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  10. Carlos + Yankovic. by liquidMONKEY · · Score: 0

    It'd be nice if Weird Al teamed up with Wendy Carlos again... "Peter and the Wolf" was actually quite a good album...

    With Bob the Janitor played by an accordian!

    1. Re:Carlos + Yankovic. by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you mean with Walter Carlos, unless you give into that "but I'm really a woman inside!" nonsense.

      Well, plenty of studies have shown that transexuals have brain structures more akin to those of the opposite (physical) sex, so in the sense that "inside" means (I assume) who they are psychologically or as a person, it seems perfectly plausible.

      But that aside, who gives a toss what Carlos wants to call him/herself? She must have been called Wendy at the time she first worked with Yankovic, so it's not changed since then, and if you're going to whine that she's not using her birth name then I expect to see you complaining the same way about Ringo Starr, Freddie Mercury, Cher, Ne-Yo, whatever... Carlos at least has a "valid" reason for changing her name, so your picking up the guy about using it just sounds like an excuse to whine about transexuals.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Carlos + Yankovic. by notthepainter · · Score: 3, Informative

      You probably didn't know that Wendy was also a gifted solar eclipse astrophotographer, did you?

      Now that's a woman of note. Cool musician, cool geek.

      http://www.wendycarlos.com/eclipse.html

    3. Re:Carlos + Yankovic. by liquidMONKEY · · Score: 0

      I knew of that. ^_^ Quite the multifaceted one.

    4. Re:Carlos + Yankovic. by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      I don't really agree with the nonsense to which you refer, but I do agree with people's right to be referred to by whatever name and sex they prefer.

      My only problem in this case is when people want to "backdate" the change. Sorry, but the "Clockwork Orange" soundtracks were released by Walter Carlos. Just because she changed her name after that doesn't undo those releases.

      Of course, that still means that "It'd be nice if Weird Al teamed up with Wendy Carlos again..." is correct, since that was in 1988, well after the change.

    5. Re:Carlos + Yankovic. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Wow, those photos are works of art. Thanks for the link!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:Carlos + Yankovic. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Then why are many transsexuals successfully treated with hormone therapy and such?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  11. The rise of the "channel" by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This isn't really a surprise and its something that matches well with the podcast & channel concepts that are a major way that people track stuff they are interested in. For "traditional" bands who want a full album around a concept then it doesn't make any sense but for pop bands and satire/comedy it fits perfectly with the sort of instant response and dispose way that people consume the music today. Something like the "Multi-pass" concept on iTunes makes perfect sense for areas where people are interested in a given area and its responsive to current events (The Daily Show for instance).

    Its not the death of the album for long term bands but it is the sort of direction that singles chart targeted artists and media companies will want to go after. You can easily see a music company creating a channel around their latest factory bands and having snippets in there to get people to go and buy a single track and keep updating it with the latest "hot" genetically engineered concept band every week, or day.

    For someone like Wierd Al who works on parody its ideal to have the parody available while the original is still popular, especially if it could be seen as a counter culture to the manufactured band. Lets face it if there was a piece of crap at the top of the Billboard wouldn't it be funny to see a parody of the piece of crap at number one the following week? Its the sort of thing that short term internet crazes are made of.

    Smart move and not at all weird. Now if he'd said he was only going to release his next album on vinyl then THAT would have been genuinely weird.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:The rise of the "channel" by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Now if he'd said he was only going to release his next album on vinyl then THAT would have been genuinely weird.

      Not really. Vinyl players are still available and we still have people saying that vinyl sounds a lot better than CDs.

      Weird Al, release your next songs on 8-track tapes. Now THAT would be weird.

    2. Re:The rise of the "channel" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      release your next songs on 8-track tapes

      And they STILL will be online ready for download within a very very short time. We're talking about a niche with motivation here!

    3. Re:The rise of the "channel" by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      True enough, I believe my parents still have their old stereo with an 8-track player. It's no longer used, but I do have access to it.

      Okay then. Make a special "wax cylinder" edition...

    4. Re:The rise of the "channel" by Feynman · · Score: 1

      Now if he'd said he was only going to release his next album on vinyl then THAT would have been genuinely weird.

      That would be sweet!

      I own every "Weird Al" album on vinyl up through (and including) the UHF soundtrack.

  12. Re:first post by citizen_senior · · Score: 1

    I must say that the content of your post mirrors my first thought on reading this article. My second, third, fourth and fifth thoughs also. Must also say that you owe me a new keyboard !

  13. Somebody gets it by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Flow and control the net, do not fight it.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Somebody gets it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lame.

  14. Interesting... by BTWR · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pretty cool concept. Just like it took an alt band like Radiohead to properly market an album over the internet, it's not surprising that someone like Weird Al has trailblazed this. Most artists rant about how ipods kill the "album experience." They are correct, to a point. I mean, albums absolutely have distinct feels to them as a whole. Weird Al probably agrees with this. At the same time, he is probably more like "Eh, the hell with it. This way my fans get new songs all the time instead of twice a decade."

    1. Re:Interesting... by OSXCPA · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Interesting, though, how the artists who complain about 'the album experience' going away aren't really making album-style works. I think of 'Dark Side of the Moon' by Pink Floyd - that is an album experience. There aren't too many totally 'integrated' albums coming out that I've seen. Even Radioheads' stuff is more 'song oriented', though not as much as other bands. I'm curious how much of the trend away from albums is format changes and how much is artist-driven. Then again, Pink Floyd put out DSOTM and Wish You Were Here when Billy Joel was writing about record companies cutting songs for time, so maybe it is just a cycle.
      Maybe portable, high-capacity, high-fidelity players will usher in an era of long-playing formats. Not an 'album' necessarily, but I'm looking at my playlists that once were cassette tapes and limited to 45 minutes, which now span hours and are trivial to create and update, and wondering, 'what's next?'
      Maybe the Rock Opera will finally catch on! (ducks)

    2. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took an alt band that had already milked years of major label marketing and distribution to properly distribute an album over the Internet. This wasn't some random band off of the street and that's a critical point. Weird Al is in the same situation.

      Speaking as someone on the concert promotion end of the industry, most bands are lousy at mareketing themselves. Major labels offer levels of mareketing and distribution that far surpass independent offerings due to both financial backing and position. While their power will eventually decline as Internet distribution catches on beyond the walls of iTunes, it's still the majors' game.

    3. Re:Interesting... by nemo11 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised more people aren't commenting about the loss of the album experience. If song-by-song releases become the norm, it seems less likely that people will even try to create an 'album' rather than a collections of songs. There are current alt bands that do it well (I have Modest Mouse in mind) but even the style pop artists can be seen by their albums.

      I'm just afraid that if this becomes a trend it will be more difficult for the average artist to convey an over-arching meaning or theme.

    4. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twice a decade?
      Weird Al Discography (From Wikipedia)

      "Weird Al" Yankovic 1983
      "Weird Al" Yankovic in 3-D 1984
      Dare to Be Stupid 1985
      Polka Party! 1986
      Even Worse 1988
      "Weird Al" Yankovic's Greatest Hits 1988
      UHF - Original Motion Picture Soundtrack and Other Stuff 1989
      Off the Deep End 1992
      The Food Album 1993
      Alapalooza 1993
      Permanent Record: Al in the Box 1994
      Greatest Hits Volume II 1994
      The TV Album 1995
      Bad Hair Day 1996
      Running with Scissors 1999
      Poodle Hat 2003
      Straight Outta Lynwood 2006

      I love how every time he comes out with an album, it's a comeback!

    5. Re:Interesting... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That arguement can only really be used from artists who use an album to create a 'work', as oppsoed to a bunch of songs.

      And yeah, it will kill the album experiences. What most of them mean is they can't have 8 crappy song and 2 good ones and make money.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Interesting... by residieu · · Score: 1

      As much as people complain about having to buy a whole album for that one song they're interested in, I've generally had pretty good luck. I usually find at least one other gem on the album that never gets released as a single, and for my favorite bands the whole album is enjoyable (there are even a few cases where the singles off the album were mostly the worst songs).

    7. Re:Interesting... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Apparently, "properly market an album over the internet" = release it for free because you're an already-established artist who can afford to do so.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    8. Re:Interesting... by BTWR · · Score: 1

      Poodle Hat 2003
      Straight Outta Lynwood 2006


      By my count, thats 2 albums this decade. Unless he's planning on releasing a new album in the next 15 months of course. In that case, it'd be THREE albums in a decade. If said scenario happens, you are correct.

    9. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 5 compilations in that list don't count as new music.

  15. Wierd AI by javilon · · Score: 3, Funny

    I it just me that thought that a wierd Artificial Intelligence was recording and releasing songs?

    --


    When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
    1. Re:Wierd AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. The rest of us thought it was a wEIrd AI.

    2. Re:Wierd AI by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      I read it that way at first too...

      That would be pretty swish though - an AI writing music. Someone should get on that, give AL (caps for clarity) some competition.

  16. At last... by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

    A valid use for DRM.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  17. Re:first post by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dude

    1st: This is about Weird Al. This clearly qualifies as nerd news.
    2nd: This is about freeing us from the tyranny of packaged deals. Clearly this ranks higher than even the $700 Billion dollar bail out news.
    3rd: This is about Weird Al. He is like the king of nerdiness.
    And lastly, it is Weird Al.

    Any questions?

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  18. White & Nerdy? by EzInKy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Such A Groovy Guy, It's All About The Pentiums. Headline News. Everything You Know Is Wrong!

    Living With A Hernia, Doctor? Like A Surgeon, Dare To Be Stupid! Don't Wear Shoes. Smells Like Nirvana.

    School Cafeteria: My Bologna, Eat It. Girls Just Want To Have Lunch. Fat, Fatter, Livin' In The Fridge.

    Jerry Springer, Confessions Part III, Trash Day, Weasel Stomping Day, Toothless People, Addicted To Spuds.

    The Checks In The Mail, Slime Creatures From Outer Space, Stop Draggin' My Car Around.

    I Can't Watch This, I Lost On Jeopardy. Stuck In The Closet With Vanna White, Cavity Search. I Need A Nap.

    Do I Creep You Out? I Think I'm A Clone Now. Callin' In Sick. I'll Be Mellow When I'm Dead.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  19. Re:Oh what a relief ... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    (To Four Seasons December 1963)

    Oh what a relief!
    Three Burritos with extra beans
    Washed them down with a fizzy drink.
    Now the chemistry's workin' me -
    Oh my wordy, what a relief!

    Two new gasses, from opposite ends,
    Like an 'Al song for all his friends!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  20. This isn't really a progressive move as you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So it sounds like a great idea. As soon as a track is mastered zip, out onto the Internet it goes, to an online store like iTunes most likely.

    Why is that a problem? Well, for one, when you buy an album (assuming it isn't DRMed to hell), you get a perfect digital copy of the recording. Off iTunes or any of the like you're just not getting the same audio quality.

    More importantly, however, the real reason behind this move is obvious -- BitTorrent. BitTorrent works best for large packages of files -- say, full albums in MP3 or FLAC form for the audiophiles :P If he's releasing one song at a time and someone wants to throw it up on The Pirate Bay as they're wont to do, they'll have to create a separate torrent for each single release...typically more people are going to be seeding than leeching, and since it's a small file, it'll very quickly become slower and slower to -get- that small file simply due to the fact that people are closing their clients as soon as they've got it.

    It's a nice gesture on his part, but I don't think that people should take it without a grain of salt. If you look carefully enough there's potential financial motivations for making this decision as well, and it may actually -limit- your options as a consumer.

  21. Nightly builds? by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Funny

    But where can I get nightly builds of his songs? I'd surely enjoy being one of his beta listener.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Nightly builds? by argent · · Score: 1

      Didn't Nine Inch nails do that already?

    2. Re:Nightly builds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But where can I get nightly builds of his songs?

      actualy, i think the einstürzende neubauten are doing that. (http://www.neubauten.org/en-news.html)

  22. White 'N Nerdy by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good god what a NERD! He is going to use the internet as a distribution medium? Good luck with that, you will ONLY have a worldwide audience and an instant connection. Just sell it in a store for an outrageous price - like NORMAL people!

    First in my class here at MIT
    Got skills, I'm a champion at D&D
    MC Escher - that's my favorite MC
    Keep your 40, I'll just have an Earl Grey tea
    My rims never spin, to the contrary
    You'll find that they're quite stationary
    All of my action figures are cherry
    Steven Hawking's in my library!

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:White 'N Nerdy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I hear White and Nerdy all I can picture is the part of the video for it where he rolls up and stops the Segway. I think one of my friends and I looped that part of the video for like ten minutes laughing with tears going down our faces at it.

      Al's a crazy bastard. I wish him the best.

  23. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, you said it was about Weird Al, is this correct?

  24. This just in.... by cbmeeks · · Score: 0, Troll

    1993 to Al, the Internet just called.... Er, so record a song, release the song for download for a price. Yeah, it took 2008 technology for that.

    --
    Remember, licking doorknobs is illegal on other planets.
  25. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any questions?

    Yeah. What's this all about?

    Captcha text: impudent.

  26. Mod parent up by untree · · Score: 1

    While the parent post may be wrong about Weird Al's motivation for doing this, I think that's a very insightful effect of moving to single-track releases. Bittorrent is not as good a distribution platform for small files, for the reasons the parent mentions.

    I'd say the solution would be to use "complete collection" torrents that have every release by a particular artist. Most modern torrent applications allow you to pick and choose which files to download, so people could still just get the most recent one if they want.

  27. Which Markets? by Foddrick · · Score: 1

    I daresay this will be another US-only release. I just wish everything was global, but it's still so dreadfully segmented. Of course it'll be available by other means on the days it is released.

    1. Re:Which Markets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of his other albums are exclusive to the US iTunes. I don't see why these new songs would be.

  28. Re:first post by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Funny

    I may have left off this important detail. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. Clearly the most important aspect of all this is the Weird Al angle.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  29. JoCo For the Win by iCharles · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mainstream recording artists: once again treading a path previously taken by Jonathan Coulton.

    1. Re:JoCo For the Win by adept89 · · Score: 1

      Weird Al might be well-known in your local geek circle, but he's hardly mainstream. Still, yes, Jonathan Coulton did this before.

      --
      Human beings are just so damn interesting.
    2. Re:JoCo For the Win by CapnRob · · Score: 1

      Dude, he's mainstream enough to appear on the Simpsons as himself, have his own TV show (terrible one, but, still,) his own movie, hit the top ten with his last album ... the man may not be Tom Cruise-level famous, but I guarantee you that more people know who he is than know who the Vice President is.

    3. Re:JoCo For the Win by geekoid · · Score: 1

      who ever that is, I'm sure he wasn't the first either..in fact this used to be how all music was released, one song at a time.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:JoCo For the Win by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You can walk up to any person in America and ask if they have heard of Weird Al, and I would wager 90% of them have.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:JoCo For the Win by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Whom I found by being sent by a friend to his "Thingaweek" site. His "Skullcrusher Mountain" was briefly my favourite song (I'm writing my own parody of it!)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:JoCo For the Win by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      Yeah but in certain parts of the country, they would think you were talking about Al the guy who's parents were siblings. I'm looking at you West Virginia.

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
  30. Weird Al info by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's Weird Al's official youtube channel.

    Weird Al's speciality has been rewriting pop songs with completely unrelated topics (parody). Among his works are "eat it" ("Beat it" by Michael Jackson), "I think I'm a clone now" (I think we're alone now - sang by Tiffany), "Like a Surgeon" ("Like a Virgin" by Madonna), "Fat" ("Bad" by Michael Jackson), and most recently "White and Nerdy" (parody of "Ridin'" by Chamillionaire), and others.

    White and Nerdy was one of Weird Al's most popular songs - it was rated platinum by the RIAA (yes, they also rate songs besides suing customers :P ) and as of 10 September 2007, it reached the 4th position on the Viral Video Chart.

    Weird Al's songs have always been popular among anime fans, as they present pretty good opportunities for making parody AMVs, such as the ones in AMV Hell 4 (Golden boy - White and Nerdy). Another example is this snip from AMV Hell 4 (fast-forward to 3:30) using Weird Al's "A complicated song" (parody of Avril Lavigne's "Complicated").

    1. Re:Weird Al info by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      I thought for sure Weird Al was going to go for the Constipated theme for Complicated.

  31. Re:first post by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah. What's this all about?

    It's all about the Pentiums, baby.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  32. Re:first post by operator_error · · Score: 1

    Modded informative?

    Oh, right, this is News for Nerds; and Weird Al just made some News.

    I'll figure out this /. format soon, really. (but isn't he just weird, and not really technical?)

  33. Re:first post by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I got introduced to Weird Al's music in Math camp when I was wee lad nearly 30 years ago. I very much associated him with nerdiness.

    And now, I get to introduce it to my kids. Right now, Amish Paradise is their favorite, although my 3-year-old can already sing certain parts of 'Pentiums'.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  34. Errata by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Oops, the "complicated song" was ANOTHER parody by Weird Al. The one featured in the Naruto AMV was "constipated".

  35. Oops again. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    The song was the same, the title was what I got wrong. "Constipated" is the actual title.

    Ugh. *buries head in the sand*

    1. Re:Oops again. by brouski · · Score: 1

      Wait a sec...

      Weird Al did not produce a song called "Constipated".

      --
      Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
  36. Re:first post by operator_error · · Score: 1

    although my 3-year-old can already sing certain parts of 'Pentiums'

    You broke me dude. I confess to being partial to the music-video known as "white 'n nerdy", by Weird Al. Sometimes, I can relate.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xEzGIuY7kw

  37. What really... by bhunachchicken · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... fucks me off about the way the industry sometimes operates is that they will release a song to be played on the radio, but not allow people to buy the fucking thing for up to 6 weeks later.

    Huh?! I cannot count the times that I've heard a song on a radio and thought, hey, I like that, I'll head over to my favourite online story and buy a copy, only to discover I won't be able to until over a month later.

    Spontaneous purchases, that's what is going to sell more of Al's records...

    1. Re:What really... by Hatta · · Score: 2, Funny

      You hear songs on the radio and like them? Really?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:What really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough* Promo Only *cough*

    3. Re:What really... by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      Not every song that plays on the radio is crap. I know this may come as a surprise to the RIAA-haters, but just because you don't like the method doesn't mean the product is no good.

      I'll probably be troll/flamebait modded by said haters, but sometimes the world needs a dose of reality.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    4. Re:What really... by mordred99 · · Score: 1

      Hey now .. 90% of stuff on the modern radio is crap. But you year an old song you had not heard from Hendrix or something like that .. you might take a second look at that album that had only 1 good song on it before. Hell I was down in Austin a few months ago and heard a song that had a good beat and I was like I wonder who that was. Damn it all if it was not Miley Cyrus. So my Niece came over with her MP3 player and CD and her nice uncle ripped her music for her and made an innocent *cough* backup of that song for future use. My teenaged son liked the song and had no clue who it was. He just about shit when he heard it was Hanna Montana (because he makes fun of his 9 year old sister for liking her) and then asked me to put it on his MP3 player as well.

  38. Re:This isn't really a progressive move as you thi by PJ1216 · · Score: 1

    1) Its Weird Al. I don't think people need a lossless recording of it. If a band thinks there music is worth it, they'll find a way. Trent Reznor always releases his stuff in a variety of formats, including FLAC. Like someone said earlier, this is more akin to 'disposable' music. Yea, some people are still listening to his early stuff today, but no one really listens to it that long. Its like that with a lot of bands. I'm not saying it makes it bad, but his music is just geared that way.
    2) God forbid people don't upload something to PirateBay immediately when its released. Uh-oh... could it make more sense to just zip up a bunch of songs every so often and upload those? The BitTorrent problem is easily solved. You just don't upload them immediately. Or you can, but when you have 5 or 10 songs (ie, an album length set of songs or at least an LP), you share those instead. It's not rocket science.

  39. 1955 called... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    ... it wants its recorded music release strategy back.

    This is really a simple response to the implementation details of current technology, just as it always has been.

    More cost effective to release music on media that holds multiple tracks: => albums.

    Not more cost effective to release music on media that holds multiple tracks: => singles.

    1. Re:1955 called... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Many people may be surprised to find the term "Album" pre-dates the both 33rpm LP and the strategy of releasing a collection of pop singles on one disk. The first "Albums" really were "blank books", as the name implies, sold empty to hold multiple single disks and also sold with prepackaged collections of larger works. The disks slid into envelope-like pages bound into the book. A symphony recorded on 78s might appear in disks as sides A(n):B(n) as 1:((N/2)+1) . . . (N/2):N, to be played on an automatic turntable with just one stack flip.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
  40. Whoo Hoo by ryzynforce · · Score: 1

    MORE HARDWARE STORE!!! yay... I am happy about that. Way to go Al! Actually it is a great idea to releas as you record. Kind of gives you an idea about what the masses truly want... And that is... MORE AMISH PARIDISE!!!!! yay! Al is a talented individual. When I hear some of his songs, it really sounds as if he is having fun in the studio whilst recording the tracks. MORE LIKE A SURGEON!!!!! yay!!

    --
    It's all fun and games until someone takes an eye out!
    1. Re:Whoo Hoo by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Wow, dude, relax.

      Or, at least.. stick your head in a microwave and give yourself a tan.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:Whoo Hoo by ryzynforce · · Score: 1

      I did that before I posted... Should I have waited?

      --
      It's all fun and games until someone takes an eye out!
  41. More profitable by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

    It seems to me, in the long run, this actually might be more profitable for artists. Although, it's going to challange them to come out with a good song every single time. If they could manage that, then every single song they release would be like a single. So rather then download part of a cd from iTunes, I might consider buying the whole thing piece by piece.

    1. Re:More profitable by Knara · · Score: 1

      The catch-22 is distribution, however. It's not more profitable if no one ever knows who you are. That's where the labels tend to be beneficial.

      Now if they were also not thoroughly corrupt, that'd be nice.

  42. Brilliant! by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 1

    ...he can now release his songs for sale as he records each one rather than waiting for a whole album

    Wow. Talk about your damn revelations. Good to have you here with us in 21st century, Al...

    --
    sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
  43. Re:He's just figuring this out now? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Or maybe his contracts with major labels just expired, so now he announces his new method of distribution while at the same time saying to the world (and other artists) "see, we don't need the labels anymore".

  44. Al vs Eminem by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    Last I heard he gets permission for every single song. He recently wanted to parody an Eminem "song" but Eminem turned him down, so he didn't do the parody. Shows you how classy Al is, and how big of a D-bag Eminem is.

    Actually what happened was he got permission to parody "Lose Yourself," and made the song "Couch Potato." It was planned to make that the big single from his album, but when he started to work on a music video for it, Eminem (or his people) turned around and told Al he couldn't do the video. Al was stuck without the opportunity to promote his leading single, and therefore the album.

    Bringing things back on-topic a bit, I imagine that incident was at least pert of the reason for Al's current move away from the album format. This way he doesn't have the success of a dozen or so songs hinging on the popularity of one or two songs anymore. Can't say I blame him.

    1. Re:Al vs Eminem by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Al was stuck without the opportunity to promote his leading single, and therefore the album."

      Interesting becasue he didn't really need their permission. I suspect it was about pleasing the suits, something he won't ahve to do to gt his music out anymore.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Al vs Eminem by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Interesting becasue he didn't really need their permission. I suspect it was about pleasing the suits, something he won't ahve to do to gt his music out anymore.

      Actually, although parody is protected speech, Al has always prided himself on getting permission for his releases from the artists simply out of respect for them. Strangely enough, a big celebrity is actually being nice rather than being strong-armed by suits.

      This is illustrated by the situation with "Your Pitiful," Al's parody of James Blunt's "You're Beautiful." James Blunt himself was all for it, so Al recorded his version, but later Atlantic Records (independently of Blunt) told Al he couldn't do his spoof or they'd sic the lawyers on him. In response, Al released the song for free on the Internet.

  45. The real new.. by redGiraffe · · Score: 1

    The real news is that an he is actively using MySpace, who would have thought?

    And here I was thinking it was just promoters promoting to each other.

  46. Re:Fantastic ! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    The titles may be crappy but the songs are great!

  47. Re:Misleading title. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Well played, Mr. Epimenides.

  48. Re:first post by dpilot · · Score: 1

    A bit over a year back, my wife and I went to Albany, NY to see Weird Al live, and we took our 21 yo son and a friend of his.

    He puts on a heck of a show, and has multiple screens going to keep you busy during his (many) costume changes. Besides, "Weasel Stomping Day" is just plain better animated.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  49. Wierd Al by conureman · · Score: 1

    The only remotely "main stream" artist that I listen to, not counting records from dead guys.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    1. Re:Wierd Al by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

      For the last time, the Stones aren't dead. I know they look like the Crypt Keeper, but they are, infact, alive.

  50. Re:first post by dpilot · · Score: 1

    I've never watched that video, still haven't, maybe one of these days.

    I've seen the green-screen version with Donny Osmond as a guest. Made me have a new level of respect for the guy, that he can laugh at himself and have fun doing it.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  51. Windows gets it right by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't have a Mac or a Vista machine handy for a comparison, but Windows XP defaults to using either Trebuchet or Tahoma, depending on the theme, for window title bars. Both fonts distinguish "Al" short from Alfred Yankovic from "AI" short for artificial intelligence. Trebuchet has a small serif on the bottom of the lowercase lima, and Tahoma has serifs on the top and bottom of the capital india. But Linux is guilty: Ubuntu and Puppy Linux both use Bitstream Vera or one of its derivatives, which doesn't distinguish INDIA from lima.

  52. Re:first post by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the Wierd Al, geeze!

  53. It's like movie trailers by tepples · · Score: 1

    ... fucks me off about the way the industry sometimes operates is that they will release a trailer for a movie to be played on the television, but not allow people to buy the fucking thing for up to 6 months later.

  54. You were right the first time by tepples · · Score: 1

    It's called "A Complicated Song". "Constipated" is the misnomer that you find on PP2P2P2PP2P networks.

  55. I actually recently bought on of his MP3's by sesshomaru · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bought one of his MP3s from Amazon, "It's Christmas at Ground Zero." I really like that song, perfect for this coming Christmas, especially, don'tcha think?

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    1. Re:I actually recently bought on of his MP3's by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      I bought one of his MP3s from Amazon, "It's Christmas at Ground Zero." I really like that song, perfect for this coming Christmas, especially, don'tcha think?

      Don't forget "The Night Santa Went Crazy"...!

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    2. Re:I actually recently bought on of his MP3's by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking of doing a Christmas Mix, including "I am Santa Claus" o/~ Give him cookies and beer, only has to work one day a year o/~

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  56. Re:first post by Lousifer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Weird Al puts on a great show. Took the wife to a concert for her birthday. We had aisle seats, and when Weird Al was performing "Wanna B Ur Lovr" in his bright red pimp suit, he jumped up on the seat in front of us and sang a cheesy pickup line right at her. It was awesome. Musicians used to make their money doing just that - putting on a show people are willing to pay for, not being signed with the biggest label.

  57. Re:first post by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Any questions?

    Is that you, Al?

  58. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dare not show Virus Alert to many of my coworkers, they would probably attempt to do the things he is saying...

  59. Decades ago.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I'm a clone now (Rubinoos)

    1. Re:Decades ago.. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      That one keeps being remade, though.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  60. When? Now. by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

    Dark Helmet: What the Hell am I looking at?! When does this happen in the movie?!

    Col. Sandurz: Now! You're looking at "now," sir. Everything that happens now is happening "now."

    Dark Helmet: What happened to "then?"

    Col. Sandurz: We passed it.

    Dark Helmet: When?

    Col. Sandurz: Just now. We're at now "now."

    Dark Helmet: Go back to "then."

    Col. Sandurz: When?

    Dark Helmet: Now.

    Col. Sandurz: Now?!

    Dark Helmet: Now!

    Col. Sandurz: I can't.

    Dark Helmet: Why?

    Col. Sandurz: We missed it.

    Dark Helmet: When?

    Col. Sandurz: Just now.

    Dark Helmet: When will "then" be "now?"

    Col. Sandurz: Soon.

  61. Yo! Listen up! by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    >>>>1988 - download of 880k floppy game over then-typical 2400 baud modem =~ 1 hour (from my own personal experience)

    Simple solution my brother...

    Don't Copy That Floppy!

    \Word!

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  62. well at least somebody by geekoid · · Score: 1

    gets it.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  63. I may need a better PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better get myself to The Hardware Store...

  64. Album integrity by lpangelrob · · Score: 1

    Normally I would bring up something about how this would affect the composition and pacing of an album as a whole, but this being Weird Al... that probably factors less into his decision.

  65. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is Weird Al?

  66. So, something along the lines of... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    I'm only supposed to "tease" this release right now â" I'll post more info about it in a couple days. But I will say that it's a parody of a song that very recently was (or perhaps still is) the number one song in the country. That would be another first for me â" I don't think I've ever released a parody of a song while the original song was still number one!

    This probably means one of (http://www.billboard.com):

    Hot 100:
    T.I. - Whatever You Like
    Pink - So What
    Rihanna - Disturbia

    Top 200:
    Metallica - Death Magnetic
    Kid Rock - Rock N Roll Jesus

    Any other theories??

    1. Re:So, something along the lines of... by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 1

      Wait, Kid Rock not only still exists but has a hit song? I've never been so happy to be out of touch.

    2. Re:So, something along the lines of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Kissed a Squirrel >.>

  67. smells like nirvana to me by monkeybrainz · · Score: 1

    like a virgin, he's trying this for the very first time. he may usually dare to to stupid, but in this instance he's rejecting the record industry who are clearly addicted to spuds. why should i drive down to my local spatula city when you i just sit at home downloading playing with my bologna. the masses are screaming they want a new duck aleady. it's all about the pentiums baby. ok i'm done now

  68. Re:This isn't really a progressive move as you thi by Saffaya · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, for one, when you buy an album (assuming it isn't DRMed to hell), you get a perfect digital copy of the recording.

    No, you are not, and for two reasons.

    The first is that the CD-audio standard does not give you a perfect digital copy of anything.
    It lacks sufficient error-correcting codes.

    The second is that digital downloads can give you master-quality, or high definition audio, which are identical or extremely close to the original tune as designed by the artist
    See Trent Reznor and his latest album release in 96kHz/24bits .WAV format.

  69. Umm, yay? by danwesnor · · Score: 1

    Although I love it when Slashdot posts an article for no other reason that to give us a chance to exercise our comedy chops, I ran out of Weird Al jokes in 1987.

    1. Re:Umm, yay? by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Although I love it when Slashdot posts an article for no other reason that to give us a chance to exercise our comedy chops, I ran out of Weird Al jokes in 1987.

      You've not heard any of his stuff since? You must've been Stuck In A Closet with Vanna White...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    2. Re:Umm, yay? by danwesnor · · Score: 1

      Really, there's not enough meat on her bones to keep me alive for 21 years.

    3. Re:Umm, yay? by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      I guess you were Living In The Fridge, then...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  70. Re:This isn't really a progressive move as you thi by DorkRawk · · Score: 1

    If this is his motivation for releasing songs one at a time, this seems like a great move on his part. He's encouraging people people to pay for music (and only the music they want) simply because it's a better way to get it.

    Giving your fans a reason to buy your music rather than steal it? Sounds like a solid move as an artist.

  71. Mod parent up! by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Thanks for clarifying.

  72. Re:first post by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

    Guess my fiance and I aren't the only ones that happened to...

    Was it during the line about crossing his eyes to see two of her?

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  73. really by njko · · Score: 1

    That's Weird

    --
    \n.\n
  74. Could you be more wrong with your 'facts'? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "The last time government was involved, they granted a monopoly to AT&T..."

    No, AT&T had a monopoly, they weren't 'granted' one.

    " and communications technology stagnated at 0.3k for nearly twenty years (1962 to 1980)."
    This is wrong for a couple of reasons:
    There were full duplex 1200 bit modems in 1972
    It was the government who told AT&T they ahve to allow other systems to connect to the phone line, in 1956.
    AT&T said that only applies to mechcanical systems, fighting the governments intent.
    InLater in the Caretfone decsion, the FCC said that AT&T must allow other companies to connect to there system. AT&T fought that by creating expensive tests.

    So, what we have ger is companies trying to create better systems, and being stifling by a corporation. Then the government makes AT&T open it's systems.
    The government is the hero of small business in that story.
    There was nothing from stopping other companies from creating faster system, except the available technology.

    Hayes released their smart modem in 1981(82?).
    It was slower then other modems, but cheaper. That is what allowed t a wider adoption.
    The 'modem explosion' was a result of wider computer distributions. i.e. a lot of consumers started buying them.
    That is why modem technology took off when it did. Cheaper chips allowed for more computers and more modems. It has nothing to do with AT&T.

    Just in case you are slow:
    "It was only after government stepped-out of the way and allowed free competition, "
    My above facts completly destroy that statement. It was only becasue of the government that AT&T had to let people on the phone lines...phone lines that wouldn't have existed without the government.

    The government created the internet, set the foundation for computers, allowed clean room deconstruction of devices.
    The government helps the rollout of fiber.

    I still can't get over how you think a baud is a bit.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  75. He's alive? by Loozrboy · · Score: 1

    I heard Weird Al blew his brains out in the late '80s after people stopped buying his records. My dad lied to me!

  76. Star wars by snaFu07 · · Score: 1

    I can't believe you left out this one.

    1. Re:Star wars by krakelohm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      totally off topic but I find the youtube url hilarious

      www youtube com/watch?v=GayASsb4G8k
      GAY ASS B4 G8K

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
  77. Re:This isn't really a progressive move as you thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd hardly refer to anyone using BitTorrent to get music as opposed to CDs or iTunes as a consumer.

    Now had you said it was limiting your options as a pirate, then that's different.

  78. Figured That One Out by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Finally figured that one out, did you Al?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  79. Re:first post by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

    Why isn't this under meh. He's gonna be selling them on iTunes yuck.

    --
    Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  80. Been done, like 60 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Up to the early 60s the predominant format was the single. Albums were little more than compilations with a little filler thrown in. So, seems like we're going full circle here.

  81. Re:This isn't really a progressive move as you thi by brkello · · Score: 1

    Umm, so they bundle them up and then release that as a torrent. I don't see any sort of motivation there at all. Only audiophiles care about audio quality to that degree. So...yeah, I don't think you are right at all.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  82. But I thought by Voyager529 · · Score: 1
    That Weird Al told us not to download this song!

    Joey

  83. Re:first post by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

    I've been to Weird Al shows several times over the last few years, and have noticed that there a lot (maybe a third to a half of the crowd) people in their early 20s or younger. Good to see that he appeals to people who weren't even the proverbial glimmer in their parents' eyes when Weird Al was starting out...

  84. Re:first post by D'Sphitz · · Score: 2, Funny

    (but isn't he just weird, and not really technical?)

    Dude, he's fluent in Javascript AND Klingon.

  85. Alternate headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weird Al Fans To Buy Songs As He Releases Them

  86. Re:This isn't really a progressive move as you thi by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

    CDs aren't a perfect digital copy of the recording. They're downsampled to 16-bit, 44.1khz. One of the marketing points of iTunes several years ago was that the files are encoded from direct sources like master tapes, giving a more accurate representation of the source audio.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  87. g0sh.. by veeoh · · Score: 1

    certainly something to look forward to and no mistake...

  88. Re:first post by dpilot · · Score: 1

    Agreed. It's really great to see the 20-somethings laughing right alongside the grey-hairs.

    Maybe there's a lesson here for Congress about helping people get along. But then again, laughter is generally supposed to help.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  89. Plenty of People Already Doing This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not like it is new. Plenty of untalented people are advertising themselves on MySpace - a little digging might take you to some of their personal stores where they remain largely unsuccessful.

    Radiohead and Weird Al were lucky to become famous with their corporate sponsorship/advertising to begin with.

    I'll have to agree with another poster that it'll be truly interesting to see if some unknown with good music can pull this off without hitting the propaganda engine. Doubt it...

  90. Re:This isn't really a progressive move as you thi by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    You'll still be able to buy an uncompressed audio CD, in another three years or so, just like you would have if he wasn't releasing the individual tracks first.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  91. YOU, apparently by unity100 · · Score: 1

    since you have taken the time to not only post under his story, but also gone through the effort to make the first post.

  92. Album to listen to for your entire life ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

    And because of that, there will no longer be the *need* to make albums that people are likely to listen to for their entire lives.

    and WHEN did it happen, except a few albums that came out from a few cult groups in 60s ?

    almost ALL the albums i have ever known about (and even still) during my teenage and youth years were comprised of 2 good songs (one made hit, one made single, less successful generally) and 12 other crapola songs.

    basically it was a means to get more cash from customers, nothing else. i dont remember listening to more than 2-3 songs in any album.

  93. I bet he's regretting... by jawee · · Score: 1

    "Don't download this song... the record store's where you belong." If he's not there, he's leading people to not buy his music!

  94. Re:first post by .orvp · · Score: 1

    He only claims to be fluent in Klingon, I have yet to see proof. I'll take him at his word on javascript though.

    But now I want to see javascript given klingon grammar...

    (comment added because I accidentally modded parent offtopic, and it is far from off topic)

    --
    My other sig is just as lame
  95. Re:This isn't really a progressive move as you thi by Eil · · Score: 1

    It's a nice gesture on his part, but I don't think that people should take it without a grain of salt. If you look carefully enough there's potential financial motivations for making this decision as well, and it may actually -limit- your options as a consumer

    I'm a huge fan of Al, but I can't stand Apple and their iTunes DRM crap. If these tracks never get released on an album or as MP3s, it's unlikely that I'll ever get to hear them.

  96. another "great" idea by guy5000 · · Score: 1

    However once you get down to it its either been done before or is reapplication. I'm sticking to the first one after all some mass produced music hits music videos or radio (with an accompanying iTunes plug) before cd. Just like in radio days itwould hit radio then cd.

  97. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never watched that video, still haven't, maybe one of these days.

    I've seen the green-screen version with Donny Osmond as a guest.

    Ummm... Donny Osmond is in the official one.

  98. Re:first post by OrangeTrafficCone · · Score: 1

    You should hear my 4-1/2 year old daughter singing "Pancreas"... it's her favorite song, just before "White and Nerdy" (she sings the chorus, although it usually sounds more like 'white and dirty', which makes no sense).