Slashdot Mirror


UK UFO Sightings Declassified, Still No Intergalactic Relations

schwit1 is just one of the massive flood of readers (and publications) writing to tell us about the recently declassified UK Ministry of Defense account of a supposed UFO sighting. Included are nineteen sightings between 1986 and 1992, with the most notable being a sighting in 1991 with a US Air Force pilot's first-hand account. Not that this lends an air of credibility to anything, just more papers with more words. "Almost 200 such files will be made available by the MoD over the next four years. [...] UFO expert and journalism lecturer at Sheffield Hallam University, Dr David Clarke, said the documents would shed new light on relatively little-known sightings. He said some conspiracy theorists would already have decided that the release of the papers was a 'whitewash.' He added: 'Because the subject is bedevilled by charlatans and lunatics, it is career suicide to have your name associated with UFOs, which is a real pity. The National Archives are doing a fantastic job here. Everyone brings their own interpretation. Now you can look at the actual primary material — the stuff coming into the MoD every day — and make your own mind up.'"

319 comments

  1. And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The U.S. government weren't trying to cover up aliens at places like Roswell, they were covering up their secret spy aircraft. Why do you think most of these "UFO cover-ups" involved strange craft spotted near isolated air force bases at the height of the Cold War? Project Blue Book wasn't about little green men, it was about making sure no one had gotten a good look at their latest prototype stealth planes and also checking to see if any hillbillies might have actually spotted any Soviet spy planes in the area.

    No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But what will I do with my tinfoil hat collection?

    2. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

      yeah, but, it's more PC to say, "Aliens stuck a probe up my ass!" than saying "I stuck a probe up my ass because I LIKE IT!"

      I'll still blame the aliens thank you very much!

    3. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by CorporateSuit · · Score: 5, Funny

      No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

      I think you underestimate the driving power of finding inlets of pornography.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    4. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

      Joyriding teenagers at faster than light travel certainly might think it worth their while.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Considering that most of the people whose asses they probe are smelly rednecks with beer guts and only a few teeth, I would question their taste. You travel 100's of light years, only to forgo probing Natalie Portman for some trailer park skank?!?! Aliens are indeed strange.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      My girlfriend stuck her tongue in my ass and it felt very alien. I did like it though...

    7. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      The U.S. government weren't trying to cover up aliens at places like Roswell, they were covering up their secret [craft].

      This may be true, but it also means the govt's creditability is zilch.
           

    8. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Rule 34. Even aliens have it.

    9. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Saffaya · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well then, you will have to explain why you can see flying saucers on medieval paintings, or exactly what the belgian F-16 were chasing above their territory, and which went through the sound barrier over urban areas without producing any supersonic bang.

      I have seen on television the videos of the F-16's radar when in pursuit of those. The commentary didn't mention any numbers, but as I recognized a familiar layout from my FALCON (ATARI ST) days, I did check the illuminated target speed indicator. It went from 400K to 700K in a matter of seconds.
      It is publicly known the intruder lost the F-16 in pursuit behind like leaves in the wind.

      Belgium is a small country and is maybe one of the few to have a fighter air force but no official, government-run public relation service in charge of explaining that everything people see is either a meteor or a piece of rocket burning on reentry.

    10. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

      Well, perhaps not *your* ass. Frankly, I think you're just jealous that some of us have asses that are interesting enough to warrant a multi-lightyear expedition.

    11. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which medieval paintings are those? And are you seriously citing your knowledge of radar screens based on an Atari game?

    12. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Yetihehe · · Score: 4, Funny
      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    13. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by MechaBlue · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why is the possibility of of earth being observed by alien xenobiologists and xenoanthropologists always immediately dismissed? It certainly falls within the realm of possible when compared against our current understanding of physics.

      Astronomers are regularly finding extrasolar planets and are, in some cases, able to determine the atmospheric composition.

      Biology is slowly moving toward transgenic creatures, cloning, and cyborgs.

      Physics and nanotechnology continually revealing new information about how the universe works. Some of this information is finding practical uses in controlling information and energy.

      In the past 100 years, computers have gone from laughably simple to being capable of modeling the climate of an entire planet. It's still innacurate and slow but it's getting faster and better.

      If it were possible right now, we'd have all kinds of people exploring the galaxy. Within the next 1,000 years, it will be possible to find planets that have a high chance of sustaining higher life forms and deliver some kind of observers to those planets for further study.

      What would prevent there from being one or more alien races from undertaking a similar mission of exploration? Why would Earth automatically be disqualified as a target of such a mission?

    14. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you think the parent is insightful read this ...

      During the 1942 Battle of Los Angeles the military instituted a mandatory black out of the entire city of LA & fired 1400+ Anti-Aircraft rounds at a single, quoting the military, "unidentified aircraft." This lasted for more than an hour. Despite numerous confirmed hits the craft remained airborne and eventually flew off without ever being identified. (Read the 1942 LA times article).

      In 1948 green fireballs were seen over the south-western skies of the US near nuclear weapons research sites. Famous meteoriticist Dr. Lincoln La Paz declared they weren't normal meteors. In 1949 the USAF started Project Twinkle under the direction of Dr. Anythony Mirachi.

      The study concluded in a now declassified report that cinetheodolites had tracked 4 objects traveling at an "altitude of ~150K ft" (~28.5 miles!), were "30 ft. in diameter", & traveling at an "undeterminable, yet high speed." Mirachi went on to later criticize a Time magazine article that claimed there was no proof to support the existence of UFOs.

      Mirachi wrote, "There was too much evidence in favor of saucers to say they could have all been balloons. 'I was conducting the main investigation. The government had to depend on me or my branch for information.' He said he didn't see how the Navy could say there had been no concrete evidence of the phenomena." (see here for more details)

      Also in 1948 Dr. J. Allen Hynek, a self-proclaimed skeptic, joined Project Blue Book as a scientific adviser. By 1969 when Blue Book was shutdown Hynek did an about face. He wrote several books, particularly, "The Hynek UFO Report" which repeatedly stated that the attitude of Blue Book was, "it can't be therefore it isn't."

      He also gave an interview, available on YouTube, where he said, "I was there at Blue Book and I know the job they had. They were told not to excite the public, don't rock the boat, & I saw it [with] my own eyes. ... The cases that were very difficult to explain they would jump handsprings to keep the media away from that." He later went on to found the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS).

      July 13 - 29th of 1952, over the skies of Washington DC, numerous UFOs were seen by observers on the ground, in the air, & tracked on radar. The situation escalated & General Samford, the Director of Intelligence of the USAF, held an emergency press conference. When asked by a reporters what people were seeing he suggested the lights on the ground may have looked like they were in the air because inversions act like an "air lens" & bend light rays. He added that something similar could have "tricked" radar in to thinking it was tracking aerial targets. (http://ufologie.net/htm/usa1952.htm)

      In 1969 an Air Force scientific report titled "Quantitative Aspects of Mirages" (Menkello, F.G. Report No. 6112, USAF, Environmental Technical Applications Center) made it clear inversion strong enough to create the visual effect described during the 1952 press-conference could not exist in earth's atmosphere.

      1956 at Bentwater/Lakenheath an object was sighted by several military officers on the ground while simultaneously tracked on radar at 2 different stations. The object moved at ~4000 mph and was monitored for several hours during which two planes were scrambled.

      When the 1st DeHavilland Venom locked on to the object the UFO shot to the rear of the plane. The pilot tried evasive maneuvers, couldn't break free & eventually had to return to base to refuel.

      The 2nd plane encountered mechanical difficulties as it flew within range of the object. The US sponsored Condon Report had this to say, "

    15. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      I consider myself kind of a "UFO skeptic", yet not willing to accept that ALL of it is bogus either.

      Given that honestly witnessing such an event would be such an extraordinary thing, it just follows that a multitude of copy-cats would chime in with fake reports after hearing about it.

      Roswell, in particular, interests me because there is so much information out there related to that sighting. It's not just a random case of some farmer in the middle of nowhere claiming he saw "weird lights in the sky" (and possibly submitting a bad photograph that looks like he tossed a frisbee in the air and snapped a picture of it).

      Sure, it was possibly a secret spy aircraft owned by the military -- but even if that's what it was, that seems intriguing in and of itself. Why publicize it was just a "weather balloon", yet go to all the apparent trouble to guard it from public view, quickly whisking it away under military guard? The "Witness to Rosell" book published in 2007 lists over 600 people who claim, in some fashion, that it was really some type of UFO that was collected. That's a significant number of people.....

    16. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by olclops · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd recommend reading the book by the Air Force's first head of project blue book, Edward J. Ruppelt, before you make such general claims. It's available free online, here, and it's a refreshingly candid look at the sighting reports from the early 50's. He makes it very clear that he had access to all the pentagon experts and that a surprising percentage of cases were clearly not anything we had made. After reading this book, I have stopped mocking true UFO believers. Their case really isn't as shoddy as it seems.

    17. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Gat0r30y · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obligatory Calvin and Hobbes quote: Sometimes I think the surest sign intelligent life exists in the universe is that none of it has come here.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    18. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by gnick · · Score: 4, Funny

      It went from 400K to 700K in a matter of seconds.

      700K isn't really that warm for a jet engine (~425 C), what's impressive is that it had been running so cool - 400K is only ~25 degrees above boiling! It is impressive that the Belgians incorporate that kind of data into their radar systems, though.

      They probably just kicked on the afterburner.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    19. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      flying saucers on medieval paintings

      You mean circles?

      F-16 were chasing above their territory, and which went through the sound barrier over urban areas without producing any supersonic bang.

      A mirage, a light anomaly, a meteor, another aircraft seen at a skewed distance, a hoax by the pilots, a falling satellite---and about 1,000 other possible explanations that are all much more reasonable than intergalactic alien visitors traveling almost incomprehensibility vast intergalactic distances only to buzz our aircrafts and probe our hillbillies.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    20. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Jonny_eh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not impossible that we're being secretly monitored by aliens that don't want to be seen, yet are seen by drunks and paranoidians anyways. It's just that rational thinking people are skeptical. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence, and all that.

    21. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by gnick · · Score: 0, Troll

      In 1948 green fireballs were seen over the south-western skies of the US near nuclear weapons research sites. Famous meteoriticist Dr. Lincoln La Paz declared they weren't normal meteors. In 1949 the USAF started Project Twinkle under the direction of Dr. Anythony Mirachi.

      Sorry... That was us. See, you take a nice, lightweight dry-cleaning bag - The green-tinted ones are the best. Add some light-gauge wire and some birthday candles, and you have a green-glowing orb that will float mysteriously in the sky for quite some time.

      My bad - Didn't really mean to spook anyone...

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    22. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Jim+Hall · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... are you seriously citing your knowledge of radar screens based on an Atari game?

      Laugh now, but when the revolution comes, I am the one who will fly the TIE fighters to save humanity. I have countless hours of simulation time to prove it. :-)

      Similar training has also taught me the best way to win a firefight (like let's say, Iraq or Vietnam or WW2 Germany) is to bunny hop diagonally, then make a rocket-jump to higher ground! Seriously, the guvmint needs to apply this to our armed forces training now!

    23. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Get ready for the staged alien invasion slated for 2012, of course.

    24. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, it's possible. It's also possible that unicorns are real, and are just really good at hiding.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    25. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by houghi · · Score: 1

      So Bill Clinton is an alien?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    26. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Jonny_eh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given that honestly witnessing such an event would be such an extraordinary thing, it just follows that a multitude of copy-cats would chime in with fake reports after hearing about it.

      What about a third, more reasonable, explanation for UFO reports? People see things in the sky they don't understand. i.e. it's something natural, not an alien, yet because they think it's an alien, it becomes an extraordinary experience.

      Every case that has enough data, ends up having a mundane explanation.

    27. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Jonny_eh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about the possibility that sightings were of natural phenomena? i.e. not made by the pentagon, or humans?

      What about lights in the skies created by civilians?

      Don't commit the false dichotomy fallacy of assuming there are two options, and if one is false, the other is automatically true. There can be other options!

    28. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      In AZ there was a story back about 30 years ago of 2 guys out cutting wood who were abducted, probed etc. then let go days later. A Local group called the Wickam Brothers did a song about it. The title of the song was "Why'd they have to let us go in Tuscon?"

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    29. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by clam666 · · Score: 1

      No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

      You know nothing of government, alien or domestic.

      Of COURSE they'd spend the time and expense for something that stupid. Don't we have a couple gajillion dollar remote control cars running around Mars right now? And all they're doing is acting like tourists taking pictures and collecting pretty rocks. For the price we've shelled out for these things we had better have a probe on there in case we run into an blue-necked aliens.

      You see, on a blue green planet they're red-necks, on a red planet they're blue-green....nevermind...

      If a civilization is more technologically advanced than ours and coming here, then most likely they've gone through a progression like ours (war, controlling the citizenry,unifying a world government, installing involuntary marxism, etc.) Once they've seized control, then spending $700 billion $pace-credits to prop up the "probe" industry (affected by global cooling of course) is not only likely, but complete guaranteed.

      Not only do I welcome our new Martian totalitarian overlords, but on Soviet Mars, the government probes you!

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
    30. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      "No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it."

      While I agree that no one has yet seen any ETs. I do think they might still exist.

      That is what bothers me too about all the abduction stories. An advanced race spend a thousand years to get here and then what? They act stupid and do useless stuff?

      When they do come they will do it much like we have been exploring the solar system. With small robot spacecraft. We may never meet the ETs but one day maybe in 100,000 years we might meet their robots. Or more likely our robots will meet theirs

    31. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      The theory that we're being watched and or studied is not dismissed, it even has a name. The zoo hypothesis is one of the proposed explanations to the Fermi Paradox. There are at least a couple problems with it however. First, all civilizations would have to agree not to announce themselves (if you assume that there is one alien race it is probably safe to assume there are hundreds or thousands). Second, you would have to have a way to prevent the people of earth from detecting civilizations remotely, i.e. via radio or even optical spectrum.

      Also, if you're assuming manned missions to monitor our planet, you have to assume (as a minumum) some form of near immortality or faster than light travel. Unless if we are very wrong about our universe, FTL travel is impossible (yes yes, I know with millions of years of technology it might be possible but if it is then we can throw causality out the window). I can believe that an advanced race could find a way to live forever, but I still can't believe they would want to spend tens of thousands of years just to study an up and coming intelligence.

      If there is intelligent life besides us the in the galaxy, I doubt they bother with us at all. Statistics says that any intelligence is bound to be millions of years older than us. Them studying us would be more like the study of ants than anthropology.

    32. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by ArcherB · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My girlfriend stuck her tongue in my ass and it felt very alien. I did like it though...

      If she kisses you afterwards, is that still considered a "Dirty Sanchez"?

      Oh, and your girl did the same for me, (without the sanchez)

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    33. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are also dragons in medieval paintings. "You will have to explain why" they don't exist or else, obviously, we must accept that dragons are real. It's well known that the fire of a dragon's breath goes "from 400K to 700K in a matter of seconds," so we can safely say this is confirmed by ironclad modern empirical evidence!

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    34. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I consider myself kind of a "UFO skeptic", yet not willing to accept that ALL of it is bogus either.

      You're not a very good skeptic, are you? Find something else to consider yourself.

    35. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by scubamage · · Score: 0
      You get a cookie for an excellent quote, from an excellent strip, of an excellent series.

      /cookie

    36. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But...but...I WANT to believe!

    37. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'ma chargin my probing laser

    38. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's also possible that unicorns are real, and are just really good at hiding."

      Maybe they are in plan sight, looking just like horses. All they need to do, is hide their horn, as most animals do. :)

    39. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any technology that was being tested at Roswell would, by now, be old. No terrestrial technologies from the late '40s can still be secret.

      So why doesn't the government release all the files? Let's have flight paths, pilots, etc. etc.

      None of the explanations so far are plausible, and they keep changing - weather balloon, yeah right.

      So, if the government really did have something going on there, release all the docs, and destroy the economy of Roswell forever.

    40. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The U.S. Air Force in 1947 (at that time still party of the Army) had just begun the first two of many programs (Project Mogul and Project Moby Dick) that would involve floating high altitude balloons over the Soviet Union to listen to and photograph military and industrial facilities (remember, this was before satellites and high altitude reconnaissance aircraft like the U-2), mostly to keep an eye on Soviet atomic aspirations. If the Soviets caught wind of this, so soon after WWII, it would have caused a major international incident and ratcheted up Cold war tensions (which were already high enough in the face of the establishment of the iron curtain). So when one of these things went down in Roswell, you bet your ass they wanted to shut people up about it.

      Little did they realize that their efforts to shut people up about what they saw would ultimately provide the perfect cover (leading people to assume they were covering up aliens rather than the secret spy programs they were REALLY covering up).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    41. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by R2.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Why is the possibility of of earth being observed by alien xenobiologists and xenoanthropologists always immediately dismissed? It certainly falls within the realm of possible when compared against our current understanding of physics."

      I am perfectly willing to believe in alien observers - just give me proof that isn't easily explained by something else that is far more simple. Look up Occam's Razor.

      Of course, if William of Ockham was actually an alien planted to mislead the human community for generations, that would be a different story.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    42. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by ivoras · · Score: 1

      Why is the possibility of of earth being observed by alien xenobiologists and xenoanthropologists always immediately dismissed? It certainly falls within the realm of possible when compared against our current understanding of physics.

      Because most of our sciences have hit some kind of physical scale barrier that won't let us progress much further.

      Astronomers are regularly finding extrasolar planets and are, in some cases, able to determine the atmospheric composition.

      Even the most advanced conceivable technology of this type can't tell us anything more than approximate (very approximate - we're looking across light years of space dust) composition of the planets' atmosphere or surface. No chance of seeing anything like cities and space craft - it's physically impossible.

      Biology is slowly moving toward transgenic creatures, cloning, and cyborgs.

      Granted, this field is currently the most interesting and we can't see any nearby limits. But in the long term, All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars. Also, where's the cure for cancer? :)

      Physics and nanotechnology continually revealing new information about how the universe works. Some of this information is finding practical uses in controlling information and energy.

      In the past 100 years, computers have gone from laughably simple to being capable of modeling the climate of an entire planet. It's still innacurate and slow but it's getting faster and better.

      Though the idea of nanotechnology is incredibly cool, the fact is that manipulating anything on that scale is extremely hard and inflexible. Sadly, I think that building nanomachines will never get away from early prototypes - something similar to the AI research. Transistor technology has already hit a limit (the GHz limit) which doesn't look like it was going to go away. I wouldn't be surprised if in 20 years the majority of computers still work at close to 3 GHz (though with 512 cores or something). Though it's inconvenient, not all real-world problems can be solved with increasing parallelism (queue joke about 9 women giving birth to a baby).

      If it were possible right now, we'd have all kinds of people exploring the galaxy. Within the next 1,000 years, it will be possible to find planets that have a high chance of sustaining higher life forms and deliver some kind of observers to those planets for further study.

      What would prevent there from being one or more alien races from undertaking a similar mission of exploration? Why would Earth automatically be disqualified as a target of such a mission?

      The energy barrier is huge. It's as simple as that. I haven't heard for any non-SF theories that would allow us to easily get out even to the borders of the Solar Systems. It's 2008 - if the technology progressed as predicted 50 years ago, we should have bases on the Moon and possibly Mars by now (50 years ago, very smart people predicted lunar bases etc. but it simply failed to happen). Queue jokes about flying cars. It's incredibly expensive to put a few kg in the Earth's orbit. Interstellar travel isn't even on the charts of the most forward thinking engineers.

      Yes, it can be depressing. On the other hand, the communication revolution resulting from wide-spread use of Internet and cell phones (yes, together) was never predicted and has changed the lives of at least the number of people as Moon bases could have changed. Even if we Space Odyssey 2001 will never happen IRL, The Matrix still can :)

      --
      -- Sig down
    43. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by UID30 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I present as evidence ... Meat

      --
      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." - Napoleon Bonaparte
    44. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

      Don't say that too loud! People might listen and say, "Hey, all these Hollywood scripts are a bunch of crap!"

      Then you can cough up another $800 billion to bail out Hollywood, as well as Wall Street.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    45. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by afabbro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well then, you will have to explain why you can see flying saucers on medieval paintings,

      Of course, you can also see the earth opening up and demons dragging people down to hell in medieval paintings.

      Hell, in ancient Egyptian art, there are humans with falcon heads. If that doesn't smash theories of evolution all to hell...

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    46. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by TheGeniusIsOut · · Score: 3, Informative

      It went from 400K to 700K in a matter of seconds.

      700K isn't really that warm for a jet engine (~425 C), what's impressive is that it had been running so cool - 400K is only ~25 degrees above boiling! It is impressive that the Belgians incorporate that kind of data into their radar systems, though.

      They probably just kicked on the afterburner.

      I'm pretty sure they were referring to velocity, not temperature, since it was in reference to the "illuminated target speed indicator" and 300Km/s over 10 seconds is over 3,000 g.

      --
      Ignorance is Bliss -- And the Opposite is True -- Genius is Madness
    47. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "I did check the illuminated target speed indicator. It went from 400K to 700K in a matter of seconds."
      A drone with a jamming pod? Modern AI radar uses Doppler to get the speed of the the target. A jamming pod could spoof speed.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    48. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by afabbro · · Score: 5, Informative

      Regarding medieval paintings, I think this is the kind of idiocy being referred to.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    49. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure you're responding to a joke.

      Still - 3,000 g. If Saffaya's FALCON training yielded accurate results, that's a serious kick in the pants.

    50. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an insult to human ingenuity and innovation - both of which have been responsible for your ability to carelessly take for granted all the aforementioned successes of modern science.

    51. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by TheGeniusIsOut · · Score: 1

      Yes, we all know the universal speed limit is ~187,000 mps, but that is moving through normal space. Objective time varies inversely with velocity, and at the speed of light drops to plank time, in essence stopping, or nearly so. At extremely large fractions of c, a journey of hundreds to thousands of light years would take days to weeks of local time, and you only need a form of inertial dampening to allow for high levels of acceleration. There are other means for acheiving velocities higher than c when viewed from an outside perspective, most methods involving travel in a "dimension" other than the 4 most commonly accepted ones, such as "hyperspace".

      --
      Ignorance is Bliss -- And the Opposite is True -- Genius is Madness
    52. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by timholman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it were possible right now, we'd have all kinds of people exploring the galaxy. Within the next 1,000 years, it will be possible to find planets that have a high chance of sustaining higher life forms and deliver some kind of observers to those planets for further study.

      What would prevent there from being one or more alien races from undertaking a similar mission of exploration? Why would Earth automatically be disqualified as a target of such a mission?

      Sure, it is certainly possible that we're being observed by an alien race. What makes no sense, however, is why they would be doing it the way the UFO believers think they're doing it, i.e. visiting us in spaceships and kidnapping random people for study.

      UFO believers constantly weave their own preconceptions of how aliens "ought" to look and behave into their delusions. Just read the history of UFO abductions over the past 50 years, and notice how the stories and descriptions constantly evolve to match the technology and culture of the day. For example, the "abduction" of Betty and Barney Hill reads like a bad 50's sci-fi movie nowadays - which is almost certainly what inspired it.

      Consider that an alien race would be literally centuries ahead of us in science and technology. If they've found an economical way to travel between the stars, then they would have an understanding of physics far beyond our own. The computing power at their disposal would be incomprehensibly greater than ours. They would have techniques for surveillance at their disposal that we could barely comprehend. My point is this: if aliens are actually monitoring us, we'd literally never know it.

      Think of it this way: suppose you wanted to constantly monitor a tribe of chimpanzees. Within 20 or 30 years we'll probably be using small robotic probes to do just that. The probes will look like rocks, or insects, or a hundred other objects that will be indistinguishable from the normal environment of the chimps. The chimps will have no clue they're being watched. We'll even be able to obtain tissue and blood samples using robotic insects. Now extend those ideas by a few centuries of technological progress and you'll start to have a glimmering of how aliens would be observing humanity.

      The whole idea of aliens flying around in spaceships, randomly kidnapping people, and subjecting them to bizarre physical examinations is laughable. It defies logic and reason. However, in the context of human psychology and sexual fantasies, the origin of such stories becomes perfectly clear.

    53. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Plekto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. I've read hundreds of doomsday and off the wall ideas over the years, but this one is by far one of the most entertaining conspiracy theories that I've heard. Truly tinfoil-hat time.

      That said, it's pretty clear that there are some incidents that look to be legitimate mixed in with all of the various piles of other junk. What they are, though... that's a whole other discussion. It's far more likely that they are actually the results of various secret programs. Doubly so since most "sightings" take place near military bases.

      And even *if* they were aliens and they did exist, it's still not going to fix our economy, make gas cost $2 a gallon, or even take out the trash. Life goes on, and there's a zillion things to deal with and fix that are more important.

    54. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space

      Please tell us your theory that unifies gravity with the other three forces.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    55. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by PieSquared · · Score: 1

      Simple: because *we* are on the edge of being able to do real-time video of useful quality from space. Seriously, we could count tanks in the middle of the cold war, and a few years ago you could see a deck of cards on a table... and now you can read license plates.

      So... explain again why aliens capable of interstellar travel would actually need to enter earth's atmosphere to do their photography?

      I'll give you that there *could* be aliens monitoring the earth (though I'll need some evidence to actually believe they *are*)... but I don't think I can give you the idea that we could routinely spot the aliens doing the surveillance in their UFO's in the atmosphere.

      There's also the fact that we've only been transmitting radio signals for 80 years, we've only had visible civilization for maybe 10k years, and there has been life on earth for billions of years. "Life on earth" has been around plenty of time for someone to come, see that there's nothing interesting, and leave. Civilization hasn't been around long enough for a monitor to notice sudden farms and call in some live observers from the other end of the galaxy, and radio waves haven't been around long enough for even observers a few dozen light-years away to get here after they heard them.

      So unless there has been constant monitoring since the earth was noticed by an alien civ, there's no good way they'd be here already. The time frame is just too short for lightspeed travel. (obviously FTL travel could change that, but...)

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    56. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's an unidentified object. Just because you don't know what it is doesn't mean it's an alien spacecraft.

      Just because it can't be explained, doesn't mean it's an alien spacecraft.

      When someone produces some real evidence instead of 'I don't know what this is, so it must be an alien spacecraft', I'll pay more attention.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    57. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by caluml · · Score: 1

      And even *if* they were aliens and they did exist, it's still not going to fix our economy, make gas cost $2 a gallon, or even take out the trash.

      Wow. We're so clever that we couldn't learn anything from aliens?

    58. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it."

      The idea of superior beings taking in interest in my simple earthling self is comforting. Not quite as good as religion, but not demanding either.

      I savor idea that we are not alone, that there are indeed other civilizations, and that they would traverse galaxies to look up my ass.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    59. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I have seen on television the videos of the F-16's radar when in pursuit of those. The commentary didn't mention any numbers, but as I recognized a familiar layout from my FALCON (ATARI ST) days, I did check the illuminated target speed indicator. It went from 400K to 700K in a matter of seconds. It is publicly known the intruder lost the F-16 in pursuit behind like leaves in the wind.

      Not sure about the sonic boom, though that can be reduced significantly with certain airfoil designs. As for acceleration, at sub-mach speeds, I think that either a MiG-23 or MiG-29 can significantly out-accelerate an F-16, so it might well have been a MiG. If this had been above the sound barrier, an SR-71 could also lose the F-16, but an F-16 would catch up easily if the SR-71 were not at supersonic speeds. Outrunning an F-16 certainly doesn't require alien technology; it was designed for extreme maneuverability, not raw speed. There are plenty of jets that can accelerate faster.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    60. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back where you came from, foul btard.

    61. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the widespread belief in religion pretty much nullifies that whole "extraordinary evidence" quote.

      People will believe and disbelieve whatever suits their agendas.

    62. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      How should we get ready, o Lord?

      (Selling all our stocks and taking all our savings out of the bank, perhaps? Oh hey...)

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    63. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like "go back to ebaums world", retart.

    64. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Harvest the lower horn!

    65. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by purpleraison · · Score: 1

      I read a book several months ago by Michio Kaku in which he suggested that there are mathematical formulas that suggest a minimum of 10 dimensions, but possibly 13.

      Of course, these are MATHEMATICAL formulas to describe those dimensions FWIW.

      --
      I am open source, and Linux baby!
    66. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Sigh. I wish aliens existed in our solar system... we would live in a much more interesting world if that were the case. Oh well, I guess I just have to keep hoping. I'm sure I'm not alone in this thought.

    67. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Extremus · · Score: 1

      The funny part is that I can easily imagine many people around the world having the same sort of conversation:

      "Argh! They eat that McDonnalds thing!"
      "Blergh! I don't believe it!"

    68. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Baton+Rogue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and about 1,000 other possible explanations that are all much more reasonable than intergalactic alien visitors traveling almost incomprehensibility vast intergalactic distances only to buzz our aircrafts and probe our hillbillies.

      Just because the distance is incomprehensible to us, doesn't mean that it is to other alien races. To an ant in Africa, people flying 10,000 miles to study them would be incomprehensible (and yes, I know that ants have no idea what distance is, but it's an example).

    69. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      There are also dragons in medieval paintings. "You will have to explain why" they don't exist

      They evolved from fish. Their swim bladders gained an electrolysis gland which separated water they drank in to hydrogen and oxygen. They exhaled the oxygen, which caused spontaneous combustion on anything they breathed it on, and kept the hydrogen in their flight bladder to provide lift. Obviously, when they died, the hydrogen would combust, igniting the rest of the body and leaving no remnants in the fossil record.

      Next conspiracy please.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    70. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was actually a lot of fun as a kid - No idea what people in town thought about it.

      =)

    71. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by bogjobber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody is saying that it's outside the realm of possibility, it's just that there's no proof. People mock UFO believers because their "evidence" consists of crazy government conspiracies and small dots of light appearing on film taken on terrible video equipment, all of which is explained simply and logically (with evidence) by other hypotheses.

      There are several groups that take an objective, scientific approach to the search for extraterrestrial life (NASA, SETI, etc.). Those institutions are well-regarded by the community. It's just the crazy people that are mocked.

    72. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just read the history of UFO abductions over the past 50 years, and notice how the stories and descriptions constantly evolve to match the technology and culture of the day. For example, the "abduction" of Betty and Barney Hill reads like a bad 50's sci-fi movie nowadays - which is almost certainly what inspired it.

      When I was a kid in the 70s, I was a bit of a UFO buff. I read accounts of all sort of aliens being sighted - tall ones, short ones, green ones, grey ones, ones clothed in shiny silver, naked ones...

      Then, after Close Encounters of the Third Kind came out, everybody started seeing Greys. No one sees tall green aliens in shiny suits anymore.

      (It's kind of sad, really...poor guys kicked to the curb by Spielberg's FX.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    73. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by ElBeano · · Score: 1

      I consider myself kind of a "UFO skeptic", yet not willing to accept that ALL of it is bogus either.

      You're not a very good skeptic, are you? Find something else to consider yourself.

      Someone who refuses to maintain an open mind, and has no regard for evidence that threatens their personal beliefs, cannot really glory in being a skeptic. They are merely another kind of dogmatist, akin to young earth creationists.

    74. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why publicize it was just a "weather balloon", yet go to all the apparent trouble to guard it from public view, quickly whisking it away under military guard?

      Because it wasn't just a "weather balloon". It was a balloon sent up to monitor Russian nuclear tests. In the late 40's, that's super-duper top-secret stuff - heck, I can almost imagine that they deliberately covered that program up with stories of a flying saucer crash!

      And there wasn't a whole lot of trouble taken to guard it from public view. A farmer found a bunch of shiny junk, it got picked up, the local paper ran a story about it, some joker at the Roswell Army Air Field conflated it with recent stories about "flying discs" and issued a press release. Thirty years later, reports of "rubber strips, tinfoil, a rather tough paper and sticks" somehow became wreckage of an alien spacecraft.

      The "Witness to Rosell" book published in 2007 lists over 600 people who claim, in some fashion, that it was really some type of UFO that was collected. That's a significant number of people.....

      You can find millions of Americans who claim, in some fashion, that a big bearded guy in the sky created the whole universe just a few thousand years ago, including a garden where he put a man made out of clay who is the ancestor of all of humanity. That's a significant number of people. But numbers don't make a belief sensible.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    75. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Plekto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. We're so clever that we couldn't learn anything from aliens?

      (looks around) Given the general lack of intelligence that Humanity seems to be demonstrating, I seriously don't think anything that they would teach us would sink in.

    76. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by MechaBlue · · Score: 1

      It's not impossible that we're being secretly monitored by aliens that don't want to be seen, yet are seen by drunks and paranoidians anyways.

      This a classic strawman: reference the least credible claims, discredit them, then assume/imply that all claims are similarly uncredible. When seeking to discredit a phenomenon, the most powerful attack is on the strongest cases (e.g., claims made by experience Air Force personnel).

      Alien visitations and monitoring can be considered a scientific theory: it is testable and falsifiable. We may not have the means to test the idea right now but that does not mean that it is wrong.

      Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence, and all that.

      Such evidence is needed to prove that something is true. However, less evidence is needed to prove that something could be true. It's important to not dismiss valid possibilities because they can not be proven at this time.

      Some people liken aliens to supernatural creatures (e.g., unicorns); however there are important qualitative differences: unicorns are supernatural creatures that would be somewhere on earth; aliens are natural creatures that exist at too far of a distance to observe on our own terms.

    77. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. I wish aliens existed in our solar system... we would live in a much more interesting world if that were the case.

      Don't get upset. If your really hanging out for that probe just find a local gay bar, I won't tell.

    78. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Liquidrage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The world would be no more interesting. It would be the world you've always known, complete with struggles and accomplishments, and highs and lows.

      Plato's cave is really a mathematical proof.

    79. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      If it were joyriding teenagers, at least some would consider buzzing a national capital or three.

    80. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Not with inertial dampeners.

    81. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it ok to poke fun (no pun) at people who live in trailers? I lived in one while finishing grad school, and I'm hardly trash. In fact, I don't think any human should be considered trash, regardless of where they live.

      Funny how it always seems to be liberals who use this terminology. Not saying you are, just that it seems to be so whenever I hear it used.

      Sorry, it's just something that's always bothered me.

    82. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by grogo · · Score: 1

      He meant 400 Knots, not Kelvin or kilometers. That's the common unit of airspeed in aircraft.

    83. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I would question their taste

      Now remember that different cultures have different ideas and notions of what is attractive, for example in Asian culture white skin is prized and considered the most attractive whilst in western culture it is the darker more tanned skin that is so highly sought after which comes naturally to many SE Asian cultures.

      Considering that most of the people whose asses they probe are smelly rednecks with beer guts and only a few teeth,

      No wait..

      scratch that, forget everything I've said here.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    84. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's American or Canadian, that's 400 kn. Otherwise, it may be 400 kn, 400 kt, or 400 kts.

      WTF, even if referencing speed, is 400K?

      Also, the common unit is a very relative term. Especially when referencing speed.

    85. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Well, I generally do agree with you. But on the other hand, humans travel all around the world just to shove probes up animal's butts. If in fact aliens are coming here and they also probe animals, I doubt the animals would be able to tell the difference :)

    86. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tinfoil hats actually attract aliens, and they act like antennas to focus government mind reading rays.

    87. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It always seems to me that trailer dwelling individuals are redneck conservatives. Not saying you are, but every time I see trailer people on COPS it's clear they are republican Nascar fans. Get 'er done.

    88. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by laejoh · · Score: 0

      Aight, I put on my robe and wizard hat!

    89. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by laejoh · · Score: 0

      Just because the distance is incomprehensible to us...

      Yeah, Belgium is a pretty small country!

    90. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      The treatment for cancer and zillions of other diseases is to have babies and pass on your genes and culture to them.

      Not all your genes are passed down, and not all your culture/info either.

      --
    91. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Xest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "1. that there is something unidentified in our airspace. Project Twinkle definitively proves this."

      Yes, roughly as well as the Bible proves god exists.

      The crux of the problem is this, whilst we have UFO sightings world wide the sheer number reported from the US is entirely disproportionate- especially abduction reports.

      The number of reports from the rest of the world simply don't match up to those from the US, statistically it just doesn't make sense unless someone can suggest a valid reason why visitors from another world would be interest mainly in Americans?

      We have people who say they've seen UFOs but we still have no photos that aren't either extremely poor quality or been exposed as hoaxes. This means the reality is we still have no more evidence for UFO visits than we do for the existence of god and the UFO is consistently, as in all your examples provided only as something unprovable "Oh it moved too fast for us to catch", how convenient.

      There's also plenty of room for plausible explanations in many cases too, how can people be so sure Russians don't have aircraft as high tech as proposed by the aurora project, it's not like the Russians are somehow less capable of keeping secrets, with their oppresive regime quite the contrary.

      Even in this newly released report a pretty obvious answer is sitting right in front of us. The incident happened in 1991, the object was brown. What was flying to/from the UK in 1991? British Tornado and Jaguar aircraft to and from Iraq from the first gulf war. The MoD confirmed it wasn't a balloon, a missile, a rocket and nothing more- why in war time would they confirm the flight path of their military jets?

      If we get some evidence that's a little more concrete then great, but whilst UFOs remain as provable as the existence of god in the context given then it really can't be given any more merit than religious belief.

    92. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      And there are people on this planet who "waste" their time studying...ants. Often they travel great distances to do that/take significant chunk out of their life...

      Also, international community somehow had agreed to not interfare with several groups of indiginous people living at the level of stone age, and it works well (though sometimes fringe fishermans or chopper sent to asses loss of life after natural distaster is spotted by them...I guess we're their own UFOs)

      Imagine that...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    93. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I seen this medieval painting where there's like a village and it's being attacked by skelingtons who are murdering all the people. They are dangling them off cliffs and spiking them on pitchforks, tearing them apart in skelington tug of war games and burning down their houses and dragging the village folk down into their graves. Are you saying all that was really true ?

    94. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      There are quite a few tribes living in the Amazon who live in protected zones where outside interference is not allowed and the tribes remain uncontacted directly by modern civilisation. However these people don't live in a vacuum and do interact with other tribes living around them so although the outside world may not know about them they are usually pretty well aware of the outside world, they're not stupid either and would easily connect the sporadic sightings of helicopters or aeroplanes as activity going on in the outside world.

    95. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by TheTapani · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Their case really isn't as shoddy as it seems.

      The case of existence is open and shut.

      Every serious investigation on the UFO phenomenon has concluded that they are real (US, Soviet, British, Feench, Mexican, Brazilian miliaries for instance). That is not the issue anymore.

      The issue is to understand what we are seeing. Remember, UFO is not the same as ET. There is no single explanation that could explain the vastly different type of reports. One of the difficulties is that there is no clear border what reports to accept. The cases get continuously more and more wicked and logic defying.

      To give three examples of cases along the scale:
      Easy to accept case (probably an unknown natural phenomenon): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hessdalen_light
      Classic case: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_Tehran_UFO_incident
      "Wicked" case: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_the_sun

    96. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by deepershade · · Score: 1

      I don't. I want to KNOW. Belief is a waste of time.

    97. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by yahwotqa · · Score: 1

      Nah, what they really need is an aimbot.

    98. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      If they couldn't do that, they would hardly be classified as people/intelligent beeings (anyway, whatever image of the "outside world" they have thanks to brief encounters with technological societies, it's most likely incorrect)

      However that's not the point - what's important is that they have been mostly left alone by "international community"...which actually tries to protect them from outside influence (yes, that's a fairly recent development...). For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentinelese

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    99. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      What about Bigfoot? Is he supernatural? The Loch Ness monster lives at a depth we're unable to observe on our own terms. Is he real too? I mean, while we're in fantasyland, might as well catch ALL the sights.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    100. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The one detail the really cracks me up from the Hill "abduction" (aside from the fact that the Hill's alien spacecraft is obviously straight out of the movie "The Day the Earth Stood Still") is Ms. Hill claiming that, when she asked the alien where he was from, he pulled down a paper map to show her. Aliens who have the technology to travel across interstellar space and they're still using rolled-up 2-dimensional paper maps?!?! Hilarious stuff.

      Reminds me of an essay I read once from Asimov's editor Gardner Dozois on the pitfalls of writing bad science fiction. The most common mistake of shitty wannabe science fiction writers, Dozois maintains, is that the "worlds" they create look laughably like our own contemporary world with just a thin new "scifi" coating slapped on top of it (i.e. they still all drive the same old cars, but now they're called "space cars").

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    101. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      From the middle ages up until the Age of Reason in the 18th century, there were thousands of witnesses to demons, witches screwing Satan, warlocks flying through the air, vampires, werewolves, and assorted other religious and mythological shit (varying according to the beliefs of the witness, of course). Even today, there are thousands of people who will claim that they saw the Virgin Mary in a bush in Georgia (these witnesses are all Catholic), or had a vision of Allah holding the Quran (these witnesses are all Sufi Muslims), or witnessed a faith healer heal the sick (these witnesses are all Christan Protestants), etc.

      You believe in all that too?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    102. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Unless you name is Scarlett Johansson, your ass ain't so great.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    103. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, they did, years ago. People like you just refuse to listen because the "crashed aliens" story sounds so much sexier than a boring old Cold War spying program.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    104. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by iainl · · Score: 1

      Alien visitations and monitoring can be considered a scientific theory: it is testable and falsifiable.

      I can see how you can easily falsify the claim that we're NOT being visited - provide conclusive evidence of a visitor. But other than proof through exhaustion in order to demonstrate that EVERY single case is mistaken, I can't come up with an easy way to falsify the claim we are.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    105. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by DougWebb · · Score: 1

      While I don't necessarily accept the Hill's story as, let's say "accurate", the rolled-up map isn't so far fetched for a technologically advanced race. We're on the verge of having widely-available flexible displays and electronic paper, and it won't be long before you'll have a cell phone whose back folds out into an 8.5" x 11" display on which you can read the morning news, with full-motion video. It may be that the aliens who abducted Ms. Hill used something similar, and her description is just the best she could come up with using her 50's-era understanding of technology.

      When looking at stories like this, especially historical ones, you can't just take the descriptions at face-value; you have to consider the observer's context as well, and try to extrapolate from what they're able to describe to what they might have actually been looking at. This is true for all areas of science where eye witness testimony is used for evidence; for example, we know that people all over the world have been digging up dinosaur fossils for a long time, based on the worldwide prevalence of 'dragon' stories.

    106. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by DougWebb · · Score: 1

      The number of reports from the rest of the world simply don't match up to those from the US, statistically it just doesn't make sense unless someone can suggest a valid reason why visitors from another world would be interest mainly in Americans?

      We're talking about post World War II, when the UFO craze really ramped up, right? At the time, most of the technologically advanced parts of the world were pretty trashed, except for the US. We were also the only ones setting off nukes for a while. To an outside observer, it would be pretty clear that the US was well on the path to running the joint, so whether the aliens planned to make contact or invade, focusing their study on the US would make sense.

      Since then, the rest of the world has recovered, but even today the US uses most of the energy, which can be seen as a sign of technological prominence. (Maybe, when you've got interstellar drives, power output is more impressive than efficiency.) So even today, a focus on the US doesn't seem unlikely. We should start to see more UFO activity ramping up in China, though, if this theory is correct.

      There's also plenty of room for plausible explanations in many cases too, how can people be so sure Russians don't have aircraft as high tech as proposed by the aurora project, it's not like the Russians are somehow less capable of keeping secrets, with their oppresive regime quite the contrary.

      The Russians are certainly capable of keeping secrets, even better than we realized. What they lack is, and always has been, the resources to do advanced R&D. We're learning now that a lot of the advanced weaponry and massive capacity we thought the Soviet Union had during the cold war was mostly smoke and mirrors: single test aircraft that we thought were both more capable than they actually were, and deployed in large numbers that were never actually built. It's unlikely that they would have designed and built something like the Aurora without (a) getting the design from someone else, and (b) waiting to see if it's even practical. The Russians are much better at building and operating proven and robust technology than at pushing the envelope, while the US is better at wasting massive resources pushing the envelope and blowing stuff up, while stubbornly claiming to be the most advanced.

    107. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are all great examples of our ability as humans to see what we want rather than what's actually there. The majority of the examples I gave above are backed up by air / ground radar, imaging equipment, and *then* verified by air / ground visual.

      This isn't a matter of belief anymore. We're beyond that. The main problem at the moment is the stigma associated with UFOs.

      Notice no where above did I say that I attribute this to little green men. I said there is *something* and it exhibits signs of intelligence. That's the most we know. We need to study this phenomenon and understand what it is. In my opinion we should treat it no differently than studying studying ball lighting or any other unusual atmospheric phenomena.

    108. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by timholman · · Score: 1

      While I don't necessarily accept the Hill's story as, let's say "accurate", the rolled-up map isn't so far fetched for a technologically advanced race. We're on the verge of having widely-available flexible displays and electronic paper, and it won't be long before you'll have a cell phone whose back folds out into an 8.5" x 11" display on which you can read the morning news, with full-motion video. It may be that the aliens who abducted Ms. Hill used something similar, and her description is just the best she could come up with using her 50's-era understanding of technology.

      I would agree that "smart paper" might be used by a technologically advanced race, but that's not what Ms. Hill described. If she had said something like "The alien gestured, and suddenly the drawings and images on the map started to move around and change, just like a movie screen!" then we could say it was smart paper. But this "star chart" behaved just like a normal piece of paper. It didn't behave like smart paper or any other advanced display technology because Ms. Hill had never heard of such of a thing and wasn't able to think of it on her own. Also consider the book that the aliens gave Betty and Barney, and then took back. What? A regular book on paper, used by a spacefaring culture, instead of a "smart paper" text? It's laughable in light of modern technology, because Ms. Hill could only draw her references from movies and TV shows she had seen back in 1961.

      And why wouldn't the aliens be using "enhanced reality" techniques rather than smart paper? It would have been more interesting if Ms. Hill had described how the aliens were pointing to objects and displays she couldn't even see, and behaving as if those things were real to them but not to her. The perfect description of ER, and something we'll probably be doing ourselves within the next 20 to 40 years, yet completely absent from her description. In fact, Ms. Hill makes no reference of any of the types of technologies that advanced computing systems would enable. The reason is simple - Ms. Hill couldn't dream up what she didn't understand.

    109. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by krenshala · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the wallhack.

      --

      krenshala

    110. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let met get this straight. You're comparing a document that's several centuries old to a scientific paper written by a dispassionate mathematician studying the data results from an array of cinetheodolites? One of those two documents is by it's very definition the heart of theology. The other is very clearly scientific analysis. One we trust based on our belief system. The other we trust because we can replicate the experiment and verify the data with other equipment.

      If you honestly stand by your statement that, "Yes, roughly as well as the Bible proves god exists." It sounds to me like you have a very low opinion of science and the scientific method.

      Furthermore I'm not sure where you're getting your numbers, but this isn't isolated to the United States. There are more sightings coming from Mexico and South America now than there are from the US. Also historically speaking most sightings during WWII (ie/ foo fighters) were seen over the pacific. Also if you look at the big flaps there was the Belgium incident; as I mentioned above there was the '56 Bentwater case; and Russian reports galore. I can get you the distribution of sightings per year per location if you're genuinely interested in that sort of thing, but it's more even than you seem to realize.

      As for your statement to no pictures / video. Not true. We have fairly good photographic evidence. The problem is most people discredit it due to advances in video editing / tracking and 3D animation / modeling. Usually I point people to NASA's footage. And no, I'm not talking about the tether incident. That's complete bunk in my opinion. David Sereda has his heart in the right place, but he's not much of a scientist. If you want some good examples take a gander at:

      NASA footage -
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pawTzpNKW4&feature=rec-fresh

      Italian footage -
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TASsaTZMvTc

      Nellis footage -
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85L77Z5-ENw

      Belgian UFO -
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:TriangleBelgium1990.jpg

      Personally I have a very hard time accepting any photographic / video evidence. I only pay attention to new video reports if there's radar data or other tracking mechanisms in place to corroborate it. Even then I'm very suspicious of fakes. I tend to put most of my efforts in to looking at historical footage. Here's a quick sampling:

      http://www.santafeghostandhistorytours.com/ufos.html

      And as to your last statement that there are plenty of plausible explanations - absolutely true! Most people that research UAPs find that 95% of all cases have mundane explanations. The problem is that last 5%. A fair question would then be, "are the 5% unknowns given more information statistically likely to become knowns?" Based on Blue Books own investigation the chance that "the 'Unknowns' [are] the same as the 'Knowns' [is] less than one in a billion!" (The Hynek UFO Report, p. 243).

      I wish I had the time to go in to more detail here, but if you want to learn about the cases that have been thoroughly studied / vetted that can't be explained I suggest you *first* research the cases I mentioned above. Then I recommend reading Hynek's "The Hynek UFO Report." Following that I recommend Firestorm by Ann Druffel. The book is a biography of James McDonald a rather prolific atmospheric physicist. And finally read 'The UFO Evidence.'

      Not exactly exciting reading, but it's a mountain of data that the scientific community really ought to investiga

    111. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass.

      Why not? I would.

    112. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      I believe the definition of a skeptic is someone who is doubtful about something. To me, that's different than being a "non-believer".

      If you're skeptical about an event, that means you're the type to question it, rather than accept it simply because it's what you were told.

      That's how I look at most UFO sighting reports. I go into them with a good measure of doubt, and refuse to settle for one person's tale, when they have little or no real evidence to back it up.

      I also consider the source. For example, I'd be more inclined to consider a report made by a professional pilot than one made by a trucker. Why? Because for starters, a pilot knows more about objects flying in the sky. He/she should be able to identify and rule out such things as other aircraft in the vicinity as NOT being from "other worlds". (If nothing else, he/she has the benefit of a control tower to communicate with via radio, to find out if they're tracking the same object, and if it's one they're aware of.)

      Frankly, when I look at one of these lists of UFO reports, I find I can easily scratch 9 out of 10 off my list at first glance, because they offer so little concrete information. (As I said before, who really CARES that some farmer called in about seeing some strange blinking lights in the sky? That could be a million things, and a lack of others viewing the same thing and finding it odd enough to report indicates it's not worthy of following up on it.)

    113. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other means for acheiving velocities higher than c when viewed from an outside perspective, [...]

      I would say that the Alcubierre warp drive currently seems more likely than "hyperspace". Speculative, but perhaps possible within known physics -- if the problems, such as requiring negative mass to start it, and the causal disconnect between the interior/exterior of the warp "bubble", can be solved.

    114. Re:And before you U.S. UFO conspirists chime in... by Xest · · Score: 1

      "So let met get this straight. You're comparing a document that's several centuries old to a scientific paper written by a dispassionate mathematician studying the data results from an array of cinetheodolites [l-3com.com]? One of those two documents is by it's very definition the heart of theology. The other is very clearly scientific analysis. One we trust based on our belief system. The other we trust because we can replicate the experiment and verify the data with other equipment."

      But that's the problem, could it really hold up to scrutiny by respected figures? It's easy to say that there is a lack of peer review for these types of research because of the damage it does to one's career but perhaps this damage to the career stems from the fact UFO research has historically abused the scientific process much like intelligent design and most anti-global warming research does.

      If someone says something is scientific it doesn't add an air of validity to it and again this is the danger that intelligent design plays on that people are quick to put faith in science in the same way they put faith in religion.

      I'm all for fully peer reviewed papers that are peer reviewed by some of the most respected figures but I'm absolutely not going to blindly trust papers by people who write them in order to try and add an air of validity to their existing beliefs. It's easy then to point out people who have been involved in said research previously being skeptics but again it's one of the human minds biggest faults that exposure to a particular subject can lead to belief in it even if unwarranted.

      I'm not someone who thinks we're alone in the universe but I do realise that planets old enough to result in the chance of housing an advanced civilisation are too far away to reach us without breaking the speed of light, something which, as far as we know is impossible. Could we be wrong on that? Sure, would I place a bet on us being wrong? No. Similarly, I wouldn't place what I believe on it either because the fact is that that is real peer reviewed, time tested science and this is where the conflict lies, real peer reviewed, time tested science conflicts with what you suggest goes for being science.

      One other important point is that of the supposedly unexplainable sightings/abductions they are all very different pointing to the idea that we're being visited not by one, but by many advanced civilisations and this makes even less sense statistically and scientifically.

  2. Don't be silly. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you really think the MoD (or the CIA, NSA, etc.) are going to provide us with the real deal? Of course it's a whitewa.....NO, NO NOT THE ANAL PROBE AGAIN!!!

    1. Re:Don't be silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think the MoD (or the CIA, NSA, etc.) are going to provide us with the real deal? Of course it's a whitewa.....NO, NO NOT THE ANAL PROBE AGAIN!!!

      Dear Morgan Greywolf,

      Please introduce me to your friends.

      Sincerely,

      Lance Bass

    2. Re:Don't be silly. by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mr. Goatse didn't cooperate, and look what happened to him.

    3. Re:Don't be silly. by Khavanon · · Score: 1

      Poor NSA, forced to tell us they're listening in on phone calls of "ordinary citizens" when they're really just trying to keep the aliens under wraps.

    4. Re:Don't be silly. by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do you really think the MoD (or the CIA, NSA, etc.) are going to provide us with the real deal? Of course it's a whitewa.....NO, NO NOT THE ANAL PROBE AGAIN!!!

      Dammit! Another brownout!

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    5. Re:Don't be silly. by LEMONedIScream · · Score: 1

      +1 face palm

  3. What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Every UFO conspiracy theorist is waiting to find out the percentage of Slashdotters who are not from this world.

    I'm betting it's a bit over 27.18% but a friend of mine thinks it's around 31.42%.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by Haoie · · Score: 1

      Oh great, 1 in 4 is an alien.

      Well I know I'm not, so can the next 3 in line stand up and confess?

      --
      If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
    2. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello!

    3. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nonsense. There are no aliens here, just good old natives of Earth. You really need to just sit down and relax for a few hours. On an unrelated note, where do you live and is anyone else there with you?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Figures. Half the things that Anonymous Coward guy says definitely sound like they came from the mouths of aliens.

    5. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by Emperor+Zombie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Foolish Earth meat-creature, there are no aliens here! Just thinking about this ridiculous idea makes my vocal tubes swell with mirth! Ho ho!

      --
      I'm so excited I just made water in my pantaloons!
    6. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by zappepcs · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Personally, I kind of hope these stories are true.. Much preferred to the whack-o magical stuff theists believe, and some big government conspiracy makes much more sense than the thought that all governments all over the world are full of nut-job power hungry ass-wipes.

      sigh... I just read that back, I know there is probably no aliens visiting us... but I rather like that explanation best.

    7. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by nawcom · · Score: 1

      Watch out for the christian mods zappepcs - they are known to be extremely stressed out when that demonic American holiday Halloween is around the corner.

    8. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by Sancho · · Score: 2, Informative
    9. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Figures. Half the things that Anonymous Coward guy says definitely sound like they came from the mouths of aliens.

      ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US.

    10. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by caluml · · Score: 1

      Eh? 1 in 4 means you have to find 3 who aren't, and then the fourth would be.

    11. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Arrrrgghhhh!!! OMFG! He's TAKING OVER!!!

    12. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at your typical mod point assignment? It's at least 63%

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    13. Re:What UFO conspiracy theorists REALLY want by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Definitely all human here. Let's sit down for a drink of hot beverage and discuss how human we are.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. Cause & Effect by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it is career suicide to have your name associated with UFOs

    Not career suicide, just a hilariously pointless hobby like squirrel eating ... or Warcraft.

    Something that's always bothered me about Alien sightings and 'abductions' is that the sightings really didn't kick off until 1897 which coincides closely with the release of the War of the Worlds. And, interestingly enough, alien abductions didn't really take off until the 1960s when movies about abductions had been in circulation since the 50s (as any devout MST3K fan knows).

    Aside from a few odd reportings (and maybe a few religions) the above holds true.

    We are human beings, we have awesome imaginations and a multitude of chemicals that effect them. I don't know what it's like to be coked out in an opium den or suffering from carbon monoxide poisoning but I think a lot of UFO stuff is pretty much a direct result of the human psyche, not extraterrestrials.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Cause & Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like religion.

    2. Re:Cause & Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like religion.

      They've made quite a bit of money off of the time Jesus abducted me on the beach and I've always had flashbacks whenever my feet hit sand.

    3. Re:Cause & Effect by geogob · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not career suicide, just a hilariously pointless hobby like squirrel eating ... or Warcraft.

      A career suicide indeed it is. We have had a good example here, in Canada. A scientist for the Defence Research and Development Canada, a DND department responsible for military research projects in Canada, lost his job a few years back.

      During his free time, that scientist worked on the active SETI project. He was always meticulous about keeping is work separate from his hobby, but Radio-Canada was not. During a prime time interview, they captioned his name with the title "scientist for the Canadian defense" or something like that.

      From what I heard, his career as a military scientist was promptly ended following that media "incident".

    4. Re:Cause & Effect by Sta7ic · · Score: 1

      Hey now, squirrel eating is a perfectly good past time. In fact, I saw someone eating a squirrel just last week!

      'course, cats like fresh meat, and squirrels are rodents.

    5. Re:Cause & Effect by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Something that's always bothered me about Alien sightings and 'abductions' is that the sightings really didn't kick off until 1897

      That's wrong. They were happening before 1897, but instead of "aliens" they were blamed on "angels" "demons" or simply "the gods".

      There are highly detailed accounts of "otherworldly" abductions going back to the Sumerians, who sort of invented language. That's a pretty long time ago.

      I'm not saying that there have ever been real "otherworldly" abductions alien or otherwise, but to say that they started in 1897 is just plain wrong.

      It's amazing that it's taken as obvious that there's no such thing as UFOs (which as many as 80% of Americans believe in) but you'll get modded as flamebait if you suggest that there's no such thing as God (in which about the same number of Americans believe).

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Cause & Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Sumerians invented the first writing that we know of, not language. Language almost certainly came thousands of years earlier. Aside from that you're correct.

    7. Re:Cause & Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it possible that people before the 1900s did not have the resources or willingness to document and report such sights? The events in your link are all reported by historical figures, whose word would have carried down through the years.

      Would a surf's recollection of such event even have been heard out?

    8. Re:Cause & Effect by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Something that's always bothered me about Alien sightings and 'abductions' is that the sightings really didn't kick off until 1897 [wikipedia.org] which coincides closely with the release of the War of the Worlds [wikipedia.org]. And, interestingly enough, alien abductions didn't really take off until the 1960s [wikipedia.org] when movies about abductions had been in circulation [thetriangle.org] since the 50s (as any devout MST3K fan knows).

      Let's not mention the historic accounts of people meeting "gods" and going away with them, ezekiel's wheels within wheels, vimana's, the presence of UFO's in renaissance paintings, etc etc.

      This is called a cargo cult, and similar cults centered around aircraft have been encountered among previously undiscovered tribes in central south america.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    9. Re:Cause & Effect by frankie · · Score: 1

      1897? Bah, silly kids. Those of us who were watching television in 1978 remember that Ezekiel saw the wheel...

    10. Re:Cause & Effect by timholman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We are human beings, we have awesome imaginations and a multitude of chemicals that effect them. I don't know what it's like to be coked out in an opium den or suffering from carbon monoxide poisoning but I think a lot of UFO stuff is pretty much a direct result of the human psyche, not extraterrestrials.

      The older you get, the more you realize just how fallible human perception and memory truly are, and how amazingly easy it is to fall prey to self-delusion. That pretty much describes every UFO believer I've ever met.

      What is actually very fascinating is to learn about (and sometime experience!) the psychological manifestations that have been attributed to alien visitation. True story: several years ago, my mother called me on the phone to tell me that she had experienced an episode of sleep paralysis. She had the classic symptoms: an inability to move coupled with hallucinations of someone (or something) being in the bedroom with her. She didn't know what had happened to her until I told her about the phenomenon, and how throughout history people had attributed sleep paralysis episodes to supernatural or extraterrestrial visitation.

      What was truly bizarre is that I experienced my own episode of sleep paralysis just a few nights later. I awoke in a panic, unable to move and absolutely certain that something was in the room with me. After about 30 seconds I broke out of it and jumped out of bed. Even though I intellectually knew what had happened to me, I didn't go back to sleep until I had checked the house for intruders. The feeling of another presence in the room with me was that strong.

      I knew what had happened to me by the next morning: my mother's description of her experience, coupled with the power of suggestion, had induced a similar experience in my own mind. Since then, neither my mother or I have suffered a second episode. It was a very sobering reminder to me that even rigorous education and scientific training are not always proof against the psychological tricks of one's own brain.

    11. Re:Cause & Effect by Molochi · · Score: 1

      Before 1897 it was called demonic possession, being turned into a newt by a witch, deific (not sure that's a word) visitation, etc...

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    12. Re:Cause & Effect by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      Something that's always bothered me about Alien sightings and 'abductions' is that the sightings really didn't kick off until 1897 which coincides closely with the release of the War of the Worlds. And, interestingly enough, alien abductions didn't really take off until the 1960s when movies about abductions had been in circulation since the 50s (as any devout MST3K fan knows).

      And what's even more interesting is that, long before 1897, humans were being abducted/visited/molested in their sleep by an amazing variety of fairies, Sidhe, elves, devils, succubi, incubi, djinn (djinns? djinni?), demons and, if you go back far enough, gods.

      Either aliens have been playing catch-and-release with us for much of human history, or one of the many things that binds us to our fellow man is a tendency to dream of supernatural beings doing unspeakable things to us.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    13. Re:Cause & Effect by Macrat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Jesus was an alien pregnancy experiment?

    14. Re:Cause & Effect by tftp · · Score: 1

      the sightings really didn't kick off until 1897

      The oldest recorded sightings are in the Bible. Many sightings occurred before 1897, but they were interpreted as divine manifestations, angels, etc. rather than extraterrestrial vehicles. I saw some Middle Age [engraved] prints with UFOs. You know, it takes a certain level of technology to recognize a higher technology.

    15. Re:Cause & Effect by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Eating squirrels isn't a hobby, hunting them is. But most hunters always eat what they kill.

      Squirrel and rabbit (and venison) should be sold in the grocery stores IMO, I haven't had either in a long time.

    16. Re:Cause & Effect by cl0s · · Score: 1

      Supposedly Christopher Columbus recorded seeing fire in the sky (or lights because fire was the only light they knew - it was on the history channel). Before that also what do you think the 'fire in the sky' was, even though this was in the bible and we all know how reliable that is, parts of the bible are known to be somewhat historically correct.

    17. Re:Cause & Effect by bogjobber · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I really recommend Carl Sagan's book The Demon-Haunted World. A decent amount of the book is focused on this phenomenon, with several scientific explanations for why people have abduction dreams. There are the obvious ones (a traumatic event that damages your mind, unconsciously covering up abuse, plain old lying) but the mind is capable of some crazy things.

      What many abduction believers are conscious of, but don't really take into account, is that normal people hallucinate all the time. Most people do it every day, although not very vividly. It can be triggered by anything, but it is especially common when you are waking or doing something monotonous and repetitive (such as driving while tired). Everything from tiny daydreams to full out trips are possible if your brain is in a certain state.

      Some people can have vivid hallucinations quite regularly without drugs or anything unusual in their body. When that happens their mind goes to extraordinary things (no one hallucinates about doing their laundry). Little kids see monsters. If you watch sci-fi movies, maybe you'll see aliens. If you spend your time at a hellfire and brimstone church maybe you'll see demons. How many times have you woken up from a dream and it took you a long time to realize that you were awake?

      The scientific method is the only way to examine these things in a neutral way. There's nothing wrong with believing that there might be UFO's. But until there is proof you can't claim that anything extraordinary like that exists. Right now there isn't even crappy evidence, let alone enough to prove something that incredible.

    18. Re:Cause & Effect by gnick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's amazing that it's taken as obvious that there's no such thing as UFOs

      They do exist - I can testify to it personally. I see maybe 2-3 very strange flying things in the sky around Los Alamos, NM per year. Definitely not planes/helicopters and their shape & flight patterns make balloons a strange guess.

      They're flying objects that, at least for me and most (possibly all) of the town, they're unidentified. Now, whether or not they're extraterrestrial as opposed to some weird LANL experiment or hobby object is up for debate. (Los Alamos is full of nerdy hobbyists - LANL/hobbyist seem about equally likely.)

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    19. Re:Cause & Effect by b0ttle · · Score: 1

      Recorded sightings in the Bible? Please exemplify.

    20. Re:Cause & Effect by GoodNicksAreTaken · · Score: 1

      It's amazing that it's taken as obvious that there's no such thing as UFOs...but you'll get modded as flamebait if you suggest that there's no such thing as God (in which about the same number of Americans believe).

      Because stating your beliefs in UFOs is not flamebait. Anymore than holding your shoe by the laces and throwing it in to a pond qualifies your shoe as fish bait. The distinction has nothing to do with the proportions in which people believe in them and everything to do with the likeliness of inciting a flame war. By your measure every post mentioning their a for Night Elves or bananas would need to be modded as flamebait.

    21. Re:Cause & Effect by Internalist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [...] the Sumerians, who sort of invented language.

      The mind boggles. The likely timespan between the evolution of spoken language (meaning something with at least some syntax and probably phonology) and written language (which is what the Sumerians are typically credited with) is on the order of 1E4 years. And yes, IAALinguist.

      More on-topic, I've personally witnessed a documented unidentified aerial phenomenon, also witnessed by hundreds of others, including police, firefighters, journalists (yeah, yeah). I'm talking about the November 9, 1990 sighting in Montreal. I was in Grade 10 at the time, walking downtown with two friends. One of them noticed the lights over Place Bonaventure, and we all determined that something at least "unusual" was afoot, and stood there looking at it for almost a half-hour. It was pretty neat.

      I'd love to get my hands on a copy of the official RCMP report on the incident, which concluded with no plausible explanation for the phenomenon.

      --
      Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing. -- Wernher von Braun
    22. Re:Cause & Effect by b0ttle · · Score: 1

      So do you really believe that god created the universe in 6 days?

    23. Re:Cause & Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but what he meant was the sittings of 'aliens' did not kick off till someone planted the idea in people minds. Quite rightly up and till that point they were demons etc. It is no coincidence that the frequency of the classic "Grey" alien became hugely more common after "Close Encounters" was released.

      Is it some kind of hobby here to purposely misinterpret what someone was getting at just so you can go on some self-important, pompous, superior rant? Yeah I know I must be new here.

    24. Re:Cause & Effect by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your post! Nothing to do with UFOs but I had something very similar happen to me once or twice and I never knew what was it was. I always thought it was sleep apnea but the symptoms weren't quite right because I dream just fine, indicative of REM sleep, which is what is lacking during sleep apnea. From your post I just discovered that it's not apnea that I had, but sleep paralysis.

      As for UFOs, I'm not dismissing extra-terrestrials entirely but I dislike how people who believe this stuff require that you sit there and listen to their diatribe about all the "evidence" and if you express doubt they try to give you more supposed "evidence" and become more agitated and convinced that convincing you is absolutely necessary. It reeks of paranoid delusion. If all these extra-terrestrials are visiting us, why don't they make it known more plainly? Come on, let's see the little green men already, "we come in peace" and all that. But they only appear when there is doubt as to what it is that we're looking at. That should be telling you something, that something is that all this "evidence" could possibly that the mind creates links where there are none.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    25. Re:Cause & Effect by tftp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given that I don't believe in existence of god[s] ... no, I don't. This, however, does not prevent me from using the Bible as one of oldest sets of stories, be they fictional or true. IMO, most people don't have much imagination, and it would be hard for an ancient man to invent "a man on a flying throne" without some sort of an input (mushrooms wouldn't be enough - the idea of a flying machine has to be in his brain already.)

      It is also interesting that Indian equivalent of the Bible also features UFOs (vimanas, see Wikipedia.)

    26. Re:Cause & Effect by Xiroth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I do find it pretty easy to dismiss most witnesses - it's pretty easy to put it down to either hallucination or attention-seeking.

      The ones I find a little harder to immediately dismiss are the ones where the witness actually disappears. I mean, maybe hallucination caused him to crash the plane, but that is a fairly interesting story.

    27. Re:Cause & Effect by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      I knew what had happened to me by the next morning: my mother's description of her experience, coupled with the power of suggestion, had induced a similar experience in my own mind.

      I'm sorry, but this just doesn't seem very scientific. You obviously experienced something, but you've instantly correlated it to internal factors without any other supporting evidence? Do you frequently succumb to suggestion in this manner, or was this the first time? Have you experienced something due to suggestion since? What, other than your "rigorous education and scientific training" led you to this conclusion?

      I submit that you probably lack the necessary information to support the conclusion that "psychological tricks of one's own brain" were at play here.

    28. Re:Cause & Effect by the_one(2) · · Score: 1

      or maybe it really was aliens in both cases... =)

    29. Re:Cause & Effect by grahamd0 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your post! Nothing to do with UFOs but I had something very similar happen to me once or twice and I never knew what was it was. I always thought it was sleep apnea but the symptoms weren't quite right because I dream just fine, indicative of REM sleep, which is what is lacking during sleep apnea. From your post I just discovered that it's not apnea that I had, but sleep paralysis.

      It's actually fairly common. Most people have an incidence of it at least once. Though it's uncommon for it to happen regularly.

      I suffered from sleep paralysis nearly every night for about a year. It stopped even being traumatic for me after a while and became simply an annoyance.

    30. Re:Cause & Effect by timholman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but this just doesn't seem very scientific. You obviously experienced something, but you've instantly correlated it to internal factors without any other supporting evidence? Do you frequently succumb to suggestion in this manner, or was this the first time? Have you experienced something due to suggestion since? What, other than your "rigorous education and scientific training" led you to this conclusion?

      I submit that you probably lack the necessary information to support the conclusion that "psychological tricks of one's own brain" were at play here.

      Well, I applied Occam's Razor to what happened. I had two possible explanations:

      (1) Aliens or supernatural beings visited my mother, then visited me. Maybe they were working their way through my family tree?

      (2) My mother's vivid recounting of her experience made a deep impression on me. She was really very concerned about what had happened to her and was more than a little frightened. She really didn't completely calm down until I explained the phenomenon of sleep paralysis to her. I spent a lot of time over the next couple of days thinking about what had happened to her, and reading more about sleep paralysis - and then, boom, I have an episode myself. So yes, I think the power of suggestion was clearly at work.

      Either my mind was playing tricks on me, or aliens (or maybe devils) visited me in my bedroom. So which explanation sounds more plausible to you?

    31. Re:Cause & Effect by inviolet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Some people can have vivid hallucinations quite regularly without drugs or anything unusual in their body. When that happens their mind goes to extraordinary things (no one hallucinates about doing their laundry). Little kids see monsters. If you watch sci-fi movies, maybe you'll see aliens. If you spend your time at a hellfire and brimstone church maybe you'll see demons. How many times have you woken up from a dream and it took you a long time to realize that you were awake?

      Yes... and what's more, there is a documented psychological disorder in which people cannot tell the difference between past imaginings versus past events. I forget the name of the disorder now, but it is serious business and common enough to be responsible for all of the abduction stories and a great many criminal accusations. Let this be yet another compelling reason to never ever convict a person based on the testimony of a single witness.

      Treatment for the disorder is palliative, at least for now. People who have the disorder are taught to frame their mental picture with a colored border so that later on, when they recall the memory, they'll see the border and know it wasn't real.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    32. Re:Cause & Effect by hibji · · Score: 1

      I am interested to read more about this incident. Do you have more information, like the name of the scientist?

      Thanks.

    33. Re:Cause & Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely correct. It is the fault of violent video games. Ban the immediately!

    34. Re:Cause & Effect by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've always wondered (and I honestly don't know, I'm not old enough) if the moon landing hoaxers were inspired by the movie "Capricorn One." The movie was released in 1978 about a mission to Mars which is faked from a desolate sound stage after NASA learns that the life support system on the capsule would break down halfway there.

      Can anybody older than I, and with a good memory, tell me if the moon landing hoax people were around before this movie came out? Or if they're a result of the movie, similar to the UFO phenom.

    35. Re:Cause & Effect by Spatial · · Score: 2, Informative

      Confabulation?

    36. Re:Cause & Effect by SlashDev · · Score: 1

      I would have to disagree here, there is art pre-1897 that shows object flying in the sky. http://www.dudeman.net/siriusly/ufo/art.html

      --

      TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
    37. Re:Cause & Effect by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about this particular scientist, though I do know that in some of the more secret 3 letter agencies (and various other slightly longer acronyms) that I worked for in Australia, we had a few black and white rules and regulations on the subject. It always amused me that one of those rules made it 'forbidden' to actually talk / write / comment about UFO's. I often wondered what evolution took place that would actually get those policies enacted in the first place. Was it some twisted idiot like myself messing around, or was it for slightly more serious reasons? I guess I'll never know.

      That said, I used to bring the subject up pretty much as a matter of routine in some very amusing places. At least they were amusing to me. Before I was employed by government, one of the psychs at the interview asked me why I wanted to have a job in this particular category. I told him straight up: "I want to find out if UFO's exist" - he giggled like a school girl and assumed I was making a joke, scribbled some notes, and I got the job.

      For a short while I got mixed up with a few contacts at DSTO, South Australia (Adelaide) who had access to a couple of bits of interesting gear (of the human manufactured kind) - in a briefing about it all one time, the perfect opportunity arose for another of my socially inappropriate remarks and I blurted out "So, you also take crashed UFO's there too?"

      The answer was interesting, not quite what I was expecting, but lets just say, even at those levels there is "No Conspiracy"

      I'm as anti-censorship as they come, but some things probably do need to be kept quiet lest you piss off someone that can actually hurt you.

      Lets put it this way:
      Through your binoculars you see test platforms and foreign planes flying around area 51, rednecks see UFO's, through our telescopes we see more, or perhaps more frequently, a lot less of much the same thing over various parts of our red dirt. We have our own supply of locally produced rednecks too.

    38. Re:Cause & Effect by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You see strange things really close to a military base where they work on experimental aircraft? Color me shocked.

      I'm a skeptic with most things - even UFOs - but I believe in the possibility very much. I really don't think the conditions for life are so stringent that we are the only sentient beings anywhere in the entire universe, much less the entire galaxy. That's arrogant and ignorant when you consider the full scope of outer space.

      It is very likely that those are just experimental U.S. aircraft, but I admit it's likely that it could be extraterrestrials as well. I mean, wouldn't you want to know the military capabilities of a planet before you went and said hello? That could also explain all of the pilots coming across things - maybe they were testing our fighter jocks. Or, ya know, just fuckin' with us and having a larf.

    39. Re:Cause & Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see strange things really close to a military base where they work on experimental aircraft?

      LANL is not a military base. And, at least publicly, they do not work on experimental aircraft.

      I'm a skeptic with most things - even UFOs - but I believe in the possibility very much. I really don't think the conditions for life are so stringent that we are the only sentient beings anywhere in the entire universe, much less the entire galaxy. That's arrogant and ignorant when you consider the full scope of outer space. ...
      it's likely that it could be extraterrestrials as well. I mean, wouldn't you want to know the military capabilities of a planet before you went and said hello? That could also explain all of the pilots coming across things - maybe they were testing our fighter jocks. Or, ya know, just fuckin' with us and having a larf.

      That word, "skeptic". I don't think it means what you think it means.

    40. Re:Cause & Effect by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Those of us who were watching television in 1978 remember that Ezekiel saw the wheel...

      OMFG. I hadn't thought of that voice-over in years. "This is the wheel he said he saw."

      And I did not know that was a song reference. Hurray for the wik.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    41. Re:Cause & Effect by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I applied Occam's Razor to what happened. I had two possible explanations:

      Why only two?

      Perhaps the fact that this happened to your mother shortly before it happened to you is merely coincidence. Perhaps you inherited a neurological trait from her, once that has nothing to do with the power of suggestion. Perhaps what happened to you was not the same phenomenon at all, and you merely had a "hysterical" belief about such events based on what happened to her. Perhaps this same thing had happened to you before but you just ignored it, forgot about it, but this time paid more attention to it because of her report.

      Nothing personal, but we outside observers also have the possibility that you're lying or delusional - or your mother was lying or delusional.

      Perhaps you were not actually visited by aliens, but just targeted by their telepathic rays from Sirius. Or maybe just telepathic emanations from your neighbor. Perhaps it was neither aliens nor demons, but simply voodoo. Or government mind control experiments.

      As a practical matter, if Almighty Goddess herself came down with a sealed envelope holding The Truth of The Matter and invited me to bet on what it said, yeah, I'd put my money on sleep paralysis influenced by the "power of suggestion". But to say there were only two possible explanations is to overly simplify.

      Always remember that through any finite set of data points, an infinite number of curves can be drawn.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    42. Re:Cause & Effect by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      A career suicide indeed it is

      Anti-alien propaganda coming from Yoda, kinda odd.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    43. Re:Cause & Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sleep paralysis is a bitch.. when i was in university i used to get very little sleep at night.. like maybe an hour or two a night for months on end... then in the afternoon after morning classes id crash for an hour or two.. frequently (like almost every time) my brain would instantly wake up before my body... and id have a very difficult time willing my entire body to wake up.. its like having your foot fall asleep except its your entire body.. freaky shit but i had a very small room so it never felt like there was anyone there or anything else happening besides not being able to wake up my body quickly... :-) never really happened after i went to having a job and normal wake/sleep cycles =)

    44. Re:Cause & Effect by GWRedDragon · · Score: 1

      Gee, thanks. I'm going to sleep well tonight.

    45. Re:Cause & Effect by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Just after the first moon landing, the Flat Earth Society had this to say:

      The flat Earth faced challenges posed by photographs of Earth from space and later the moon, to which member Samuel Shenton remarked: "It's easy to see how a photograph like that could fool the untrained eye". The society took the position that the Apollo Moon landings were a hoax, staged by Hollywood and based on a script by Arthur C. Clarke, a position also held by others not connected to the Flat Earth Society.
      It's all here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_earth_society

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    46. Re:Cause & Effect by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Mr Slippery had it pegged, but I'd also like to point out the number of words needed to describe 1 and 2 vary widely.

      Sometimes the 'simplest' explanation requires the fewest words to explain it, as well.

    47. Re:Cause & Effect by krenshala · · Score: 1

      Of course, the Flat Earthers are in denial about a fact that was proved over two thousand years ago: we live on the outside of a sphere.

      --

      krenshala

    48. Re:Cause & Effect by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Of course, you're correct. Unless you happen to believe that what we now consider "language" started when God scolded the Babylonians, that is.

      Do we have any data that shows that language existed before the Sumerians? It's an interesting question that goes to the heart of the literal interpretation of the bible.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    49. Re:Cause & Effect by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Of course, you're correct about my not making it clear that I was referring to written language.

      Regarding your sighting, there was also a startling sighting here at Chicago's O'Hare airport earlier this year. Over a thousand people reported seeing the object, including pilots, air traffic controllers, police (including one Captain), security guards, airframe maintenance people, passengers both on planes and waiting at the gates, and several military personnel who were on their way to the USO facility at O'Hare. The object was tracked on a couple of separate radar systems.

      Airport and airline personnel were talking a blue streak about the sighting until the next morning, when it seemed like everyone clammed up except the civilians. It was the first time I've seen the Chicago daily papers (Tribune and Sun Times) treat such a story with any seriousness, without snarky references to "little green men".

      The most interesting sighting of the year so far, though, has to be the Texas incident where thousands of people watched an object heading directly for President Bush's ranch, chased by as many as ten fighter jets.

      Naturally, the Air Force said the Texas sighting was a "weather balloon". It's amazing that they can even say the words "weather balloon" without busting into laughter. Oh, and the squad of fighter jets? It was a "routine exercise".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  5. Choice of words by Dr.+Grabow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "charlatans and lunatics" - what an exquisitely perfect choice of words ...

    1. Re:Choice of words by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      "charlatans and lunatics" - what an exquisitely perfect choice of words ...

      If you think about it, if you were put in charge of a coverup and had sufficient resources, then planting some "colorful" lunatics into the public scene would be an ideal way to downplay the issue. Aliens may be out-Roving even Rove. (Although I suspect he is one ;-)
                   

  6. UFO and UK... by geogob · · Score: 1

    Great! Maybe it's time to have another chat with Edgar Mitchell...

  7. Proves nothing! by snarfies · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The government is still holding onto the REAL paperwork that shows what they've been hiding all these years! This stuff they're declassifying is just a distraction. ...or so the kooks will be saying shortly, if not already.

    1. Re:Proves nothing! by psychicninja · · Score: 1

      The government is still holding onto the REAL paperwork that shows what they've been hiding all these years! This stuff they're declassifying is just a distraction. ...or so the kooks will be saying shortly, if not already.

      So you're saying you're a kook?

  8. You say tomato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you mean the UK Ministry of Defence???

  9. There is no real paperwork by davidwr · · Score: 1

    The aliens vaporized it.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  10. In News you're supposed to have NEW, no? by Syberz · · Score: 1
    --
    ~Syberz
    1. Re:In News you're supposed to have NEW, no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're new here, aren't you?

  11. Why not by tsa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sorry as long as there aren't good and verified explanations for all the UFO sightings out there we can't rule out the existence of alien craft visiting our planet. Having said that, the chances of aliens visiting us is really very small. The first reported UFO sightings are much older than 1897, BTW.

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Why not by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Having said that, the chances of aliens visiting us is really very small.

      How can you say that? We really cannot provide a reliable probability estimate at this point. Related topic: Fermi's Paradox.

      Also note that the threshold of evidence for "legitimate mystery" is much lower than "are ET's". Some popular skeptics omit this fact for some reason. The distinction is scientifically important.

    2. Re:Why not by thermian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh please... "The Egyptian papyrus described a fleet of flying saucers darting through the sky?"

      Seriously....

      The Egyptians said NO SUCH THING, that is by way of being utter nonsense.
      There have been lots of fascinating reports of strange events and objects in the sky in ancient time, most notably by the chinese. These are interesting because they reveal that early civilizations felt such things were worth recording, but most of the time information is scant, sufficient only to allow us to speculate as to causes, such as meteors or ball lightening.

      They are not, in any way at all, indicating that there were people sitting around pondering alien spaceships in the ancient world. Ever...

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    3. Re:Why not by tsa · · Score: 1

      That first link is indeed a bit dodgy, but if you look a bit around you find more articles on the web with references in them that show older sightings than from the 19th century.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    4. Re:Why not by gnick · · Score: 1

      Oh please... "The Egyptian papyrus described a fleet of flying saucers darting through the sky?"

      Seriously....

      The Egyptians said NO SUCH THING, that is by way of being utter nonsense.

      I can think of at least a couple of references right off the top of my head that handily contradict that.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    5. Re:Why not by thermian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That first link is indeed a bit dodgy, but if you look a bit around you find more articles on the web with references in them that show older sightings than from the 19th century.

      I don't doubt there are. However, its not early sightings of strange things in the sky I take issue with. Rather its the insertion of spurious conclusions without proof, and worse, the hailing of these rather childish idea's as confirmed and reliable sightings.

      I do in fact believe wholeheartedly in the existence of extraterrestrial life. However I do so as a scientist. Therefore I recognize my belief in this regard is totally without proof, and I freely admit this. It is more a hope then a belief in this respect, and one I expect only my descendants will answer.

      I don't however believe in alien visitation on Earth, in fact I disregard such claims completely. Those who do believe such things lack even the most basic grasp of the inconceivable distances involved and the velocities that would be required for such a journey.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    6. Re:Why not by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They are not, in any way at all, indicating that there were people sitting around pondering alien spaceships in the ancient world. Ever...

      It would be hard to expect an ancient people to say, "we saw an aerodynamic craft of strange configuration approach at mach 12, capable of extreme delta-V acceleration, flying in formation with a mothership and several smaller ships, each with thrust powered by some sort of engine producing multi-spectral visible radiation," but we might hear things like:

      Ezekiel:

      4. And I looked, and, behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a great cloud, and a fire infolding itself, and a brightness was about it, and out of the midst thereof as the colour of amber, out of the midst of the fire.

      16. The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the colour of a beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.

      17. When they went, they went upon their four sides: and they turned not when they went.

      18. As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful; and their rings were full of eyes round about them four.

      19. And when the living creatures went, the wheels went by them: and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up.

      20. Whithersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted up over against them: for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels.

      27. And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about.

      28. As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the LORD. And when I saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one that spake.

      2 Kings 2:

      11. And it came to pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire, and horses of fire, and parted them both asunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven.

      Isaiah 66:

      15. For, behold, the LORD will come with fire, and with his chariots like a whirlwind, to render his anger with fury, and his rebuke with flames of fire.

      Jeremiah 4:

      13. Behold, he shall come up as clouds, and his chariots shall be as a whirlwind: his horses are swifter than eagles. Woe unto us! for we are spoiled.

      Zechariah 6:

      1. And I turned, and lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came four chariots out from between two mountains; and the mountains were mountains of brass.

      One might consider something like this a modern re-imagining of Ezekiel's wheels.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Why not by thermian · · Score: 1

      Given that people in the ancient world believed completely that the sky was populated by gods, its not at all far fetched to expect them to explain odd occurrences in such a fashion.

      Extrapolating alien visitation from this is foolish.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    8. Re:Why not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rather childish idea's

      Look out, here comes an S!!!

    9. Re:Why not by Xest · · Score: 1

      "One might consider something like this [engadget.com] a modern re-imagining of Ezekiel's wheels."

      Indeed one might.

      But then, the text is so obscure and non-sensical for the most part one might make pretty much whatever they want from it.

      You're making the same mistake that most people with religious beliefs make. The problem is that all the quotes you give sound much like your average fantasy/sci-fi story, just because something was written in ancient times doesn't mean it's not still fiction. Fiction isn't a genre that just appeared in the 20th century.

      In another couple of thousand years I'd hope people have become intelligent enough in general to not look back at Lord of the rings and read descriptions of the giant eagles as proof that we all believed in alien spaceships visiting Earth.

    10. Re:Why not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, missed that. Can you say it again?

    11. Re:Why not by giuda · · Score: 1

      That's a relay from Mass Effect!

    12. Re:Why not by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      just because something was written in ancient times doesn't mean it's not still fiction

      Is there some scholarship to show that the contemporary people thought it was fiction? I thought the opposite was true.

      Given the choice between misunderstanding and mass insanity, the former seems more likely.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  12. I beg to disagree by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

    To counter your wildly irresponsible statements, I offer proof.

  13. but tell me how you really feel.... by Brigadier · · Score: 1

    Maybe the aliens just want to test our tendency to panic, create histaria, and believe ridiculous things even though a plausible explanation may already exist ?

  14. It's all a coverup... by NoNeeeed · · Score: 1

    to hide the fact they have been spending the defence budget on giant Nerf guns.

  15. Conspiracy by Freeside1 · · Score: 1

    Obviously these are just the reported UFO sightings that weren't aliens.

  16. UFO != alien apacecraft by Itninja · · Score: 5, Informative

    Say it with me folks.... UFO stands for Unidentified Flying Object. Of course UFO's exist! If a flaming dead cat is dropped from an airplane at night, and no one can identify it, it's a UFO. Anything that cannot readily be identified, and that flies, is a UFO. Now, whether some of these UFOs are alien spacecraft is an entirely different matter. Of course, once a UFO is identified as an alien spacecraft, it would then cease to be a UFO at all.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, if you're going to nitpick, alien != extraterrestrial.

    2. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am pretty sure that a flaming dead cat dropped from an airplane at night would be considered a Unidentified "Falling" Object. Flaming dead cats do not fly.

    3. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do think the logical fallacy of assuming UFO=ET is worth noting. It seems highly unlikely that first contact from another galaxy would involve anything remotely humanoid.

      My thought is that if humanoids WERE prowling the skies, time travel would be the (comparatively) more plausible explanation.

    4. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and hacker originally didn't mean someone who breaks into other peoples computers and steals stuff either. Definitions change over time. UFO is commonly used shorthand for alien space craft not for falling, burning cats. You may not like it but hard cheese. Getting all wound up over 'exact' definitions doesn't make you an intellectual god in the eyes of your peers it just makes you look like a pedantic douchebag trying to avoid the discussion.

    5. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by khallow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems highly unlikely that first contact from another galaxy would involve anything remotely humanoid.

      Like we'd have a clue one way or another. As I see it, there has been from the begining of multicelled life on Earth, strong selection pressure for limbs. And the biped has independently evolved at least twice (dinosaurs and primates). My take is that any planet with sufficiently advanced and varied life on it is going to have something bipedal. It might not be intelligent or even what we'd consider animal though.

    6. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by Plekto · · Score: 1

      My take is that any planet with sufficiently advanced and varied life on it is going to have something bipedal.

      Technically, it would tend to be symmetrical along at least one axis. Not necessarily bipedal.

    7. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by khallow · · Score: 1

      I used the word "bipedal" for a reason. Because I meant bipedal. No technical qualification.

    8. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by dbcad7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know that for sure.. sounds like testing is necessary.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    9. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do definitely fly when they are shot from a cannon.

    10. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by TheLink · · Score: 1

      1) Start with a live cat.
      2) Fasten securely a piece of buttered toast on its back, buttered side facing away from the back.
      3) Add flame.
      4) Drop cat. :)

      --
    11. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Ah, the "Panspermia Gallifreya" hypothesis.

    12. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by khallow · · Score: 1

      No. Parallel evolution. The morphology of a living being formed that way for a reason. Some of it is legacy, the result of the evolutionary path taken to get to this point, and some of it is because the shape of the body is advantageous for survival. My take is that there are a lot of situations where a bipedal shape can be advantageous. For example, any "Earth-like" world with a modest atmosphere and solid ground. Even in situations where legs wouldn't have an obvious advantage, such as suspension in the atmosphere of a gas giant, one might see bipedal parasites or symbiotes on larger floating life forms.

    13. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      No. Not parallel evolution. Different planets are, well... different. And there's really no saying that humanity exists in the optimum shape for our environment or prehistoric natural habitat. Evolution doesn't select for "The Fittest", it selects for "The Good Enough". The fact that the first creatures to evolve Good Enough intelligence with Good Enough prehensile limbs to create civilization and tame their environment were bipeds is very probably a coincidence.

    14. Re:UFO != alien apacecraft by khallow · · Score: 1

      No. Not parallel evolution. Different planets are, well... different. And there's really no saying that humanity exists in the optimum shape for our environment or prehistoric natural habitat. Evolution doesn't select for "The Fittest", it selects for "The Good Enough". The fact that the first creatures to evolve Good Enough intelligence with Good Enough prehensile limbs to create civilization and tame their environment were bipeds is very probably a coincidence.

      A coincidence that is likely to occur on other planets as well. That's parallel evolution. Plus I think you downplay the effectiveness of evolution.

  17. But of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see something.

    I don't know what it is.

    Therefore it is an alien spacecraft.

    QED

    1. Re:But of course! by nawcom · · Score: 1

      Nope, its a UFO. That's the exact definition of it. If an article is posted about alien spacecraft sightings, then that's your cue to type in your lame comment.

  18. New Scientist by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm from Earth, but I'm a cyborg. No, really, I am. You will be assimilated.

    Anyway, back on topic. I just had New Scientest open, and they are running the same story:

    One pilot said he was seconds away from firing 24 rockets at the object, which moved erratically and gave a radar reading like "a flying aircraft carrier".

    It spent periods motionless in the sky before reaching estimated speeds of more than 12,000 kilometres per hour, said pilot Milton Torres, who is now 77 and living in Miami, Florida.

    After the alert, an unnamed man told Torres he must never talk about the incident and he duly kept silent for more than 30 years. His story was among dozens of UFO sightings in defence ministry files released at the National Archives in London (see UK releases classified UFO files).

    The files blame other UFO sightings on weather balloons, clouds or normal aircraft.

    UFO expert David Clarke said the sighting may have been part of a secret US project to create phantom aircraft on radar screens to test Soviet air defences. "Perhaps what this pilot had seen was some kind of experiment in electronic warfare," he said. "Something very unusual happened."

    <snip>

    The documents contain no official explanation for the incident, which came at a time of heightened tension between the West and the Soviet Union. Planes were on constant stand-by at British bases for a possible Soviet attack.

    "I shall never forget it," Torres told the Times. "On that night I was ordered to open fire even before I had taken off. That had never happened before."

  19. Re:Illin in the panicillin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Can we please get some entertaining trolls? This simply makes no sense.

  20. It's more than sightings by chrisarn · · Score: 1

    The documents actually contain correspondance from people writing to the minister of defense asking for more information. So the material would also be of interest for researching what questions people ask about the UFO sightings. I wrote ver briefly about it earlier today here: http://www.arnold.se/chris/2008/10/british-ufo-archive-released/

  21. Well said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Not that this lends an air of credibility to anything, just more papers with more words. " ...spoken like someone who didn't take the time to read the documents before jumping to conclusions. Congratulations on that.

  22. The Sumerian connection by LuxMaker · · Score: 1

    The ancient Sumerians had a Star Gate and in their cuneiforms a tale was told of a craft with a lapiz lazuli underbelly and inside it had walls that talked and gave advice. I can not find a direct link to the text at the moment.

    --
    I regret that I only have one mod point to give per post.
  23. We are just the experiment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you all realize that by now? We are nothing more than a lab experiment for them. Our world is their test tube. The sightings etc are just them coming to check on our progress. the pyramids, stonehenge, and the heads on easter island..are just a few of the things created to worship our alien Gods.

    Bow now and worship before its too late! When is the next comet due?? Anyone for some kool aid?

  24. The US has a good UFO detection system by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    Interestingly, the US has had, for several decades, a system which can detect UFOs - GEODSS, the Ground Based-Electro-Optical Deep Space Surveillance System. Each GEODSS site (there are three currently active, plus a mobile unit) has a pair of 40-inch telescopes. These were the first fully computerized telescopes, working since the 1980s. The telescopes scan the sky every night. They can detect moving bright objects as streaks, but there's more capability than that. They have a star atlas, and know what should be in each image, so anything that shouldn't be there is detected. If a known star is missing, that's interesting too; it may indicate a dark object. There are two telescopes, so for low-orbit objects, they can get parallax. Multiple sites can be coupled together to get parallax on more distant objects. They can even use one telescope with a laser to illuminate satellites while taking a picture with the other. This is how the USAF finds new satellites, near-earth asteroids, and nonmetallic space junk. The system was recnelty upgraded to use CCD imagers (it used to be tube camera based) and to use better alignment algorithms, so it's now both more sensitive and more accurate.

    This is all tied to NORAD in Colorado Springs. GEODSS knows what an incoming ICBM trajectory looks like, and if it ever sees one, NORAD gets notified, without any action from the GEODSS site operators.

    GEODSS is a real, live, functional UFO detection system that's been running for decades. If anything big enough to be interesting was anywhere near the planet for more than a few hours, it would be noticed. Even the target didn't reflect radar or light, it could be detected because it would occasionally occult a star.

    1. Re:The US has a good UFO detection system by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If anything big enough to be interesting was anywhere near the planet for more than a few hours, it would be noticed.

      And it would probably get written into a classified report, filed away for twenty or thirty years, then released to the public, yes?

    2. Re:The US has a good UFO detection system by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      Damnit! That system is a word-for-word description of my old idea for detecting stealth/stealthy aircraft- I came up with it in low-observables/composites class a few years back.

      This is not the first time this has happened. I don't know what's more disappointing: Thinking that my idea would never be used, or finding out that it wasn't even my idea...

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    3. Re:The US has a good UFO detection system by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Damnit! That system is a word-for-word description of my old idea for detecting stealth/stealthy aircraft- I came up with it in low-observables/composites class a few years back.

      GEODSS is unsuitable for detecting low-flying aircraft. The field of view with big telescopes is too small. Sites have to be installed in high-altitude locations with good seeing. It's for looking at targets much further out. There are smaller electro-optical trackers for anti-aircraft use.

      The most useful approach for detecting stealthed aircraft is bistatic radar, a subject which tends not to be discussed much in the open literature. Ordinary "monostatic" radar has the transmitter and the receiver in the same location. Stealthed aircraft are designed to have a very small radar reflection of the incoming beam back in the direction from which it came. That's why the weird aircraft geometries. But only to a limited extent do they absorb radar beam energy. Much of it is reflected off in other directions. Bistatic radars, where the transmitter(s) and receivers(s) are in different locations, can pick up those reflections. There are some clever ideas in this space. But I digress.

    4. Re:The US has a good UFO detection system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's an idea: invent time travel and go back in time and be the first to invent this. How do we know this hasn't already happened? Have you DNA swabbed the inventor of this system to make sure it's not you? Oh, also don't fuck your mother.

    5. Re:The US has a good UFO detection system by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's what Gary McKinnon was looking for.

      BTW they're going to extradite him and jail him for quite a long while.

      To me it seems a bit strange that they're throwing the whole book at him.

      They should be jailing spammers, the malware DDoS bunch, and the Sony bunch who approved the "CD" rootkit.

      --
    6. Re:The US has a good UFO detection system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NORAD? That's where the SGC is!

  25. UFO sightings in Scotland... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... seem to be centred around Bonnybridge. Now, without wanting to sound like a UFO skeptic (I'm not) I do find myself wondering if "strange lights in the east" might have something to do with the flare stacks at the oil refinery in Grangemouth, the very bright strobes on a nearby pair of *immense* electricity pylons (couple of hundred metres tall) and a very tall power station chimney with strobes. Couple all that up with a bit of low cloud and you get some very odd effects. I used to drive through this area every day - at night in the winter you got some really odd glare off the clouds.

  26. Such a great distractor ! by speedlaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    UFO..... Maybe a secret hypersonic craft, since the SR 71 is retired, and there in "no" current replacement ? A cover up for soviet hypersonics ? Can't admit they have one and we don't. Consider that it is a great big deal to get here. I agree with the poster that your "abducted" people story is not rational. Kidnap a few humans if you need them, breed, and sequence the DNA, or just clone your own if you need to at this level of supposed technology. No one is coming here to bugger Bubba. Of course, if anyone had alien tech, it would be a huge leg up, aka the Terminator or Star Trek's Timeship stories. The fact that no one has just come out with a clean endless power source or radical new weapon is proof that no one has any significant alien artifacts.. -or at least ones we can figure out.

    1. Re:Such a great distractor ! by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      just thought I'd mention that with our space technology, the U-2, and UAVs filling the gaps, we don't especially need hypersonic aircraft. there is absolutely no need for them when our sats can capture better images than the first iterations of the sr-71 could obtain. Our weapons, however, DO remain hypersonic, but I don't think that's what you were referring to.

      carry on...

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  27. Being British,what are flying American acronyms... by D4C5CE · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...good for, when you've got genuine castles with even more genuine ghosts, and then again Nessie if Scottish summer gets all too boring?

    If anything, Her Majesty's extraterrestrials, keen to avoid any interference with the Royal Air Force (or, heaven forfend, the Home Secretary's wrath), stay orderly well grounded, and are kept busy making corn circles to lure Japanese tourists or those from insubordinate colonies to the fields of Devon!

  28. Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are literally tens-of-millions (if not hundreds of millions) more cameras in the hands of the residents of the planet earth than there were even 15 years ago. Cameras in phones, cameras in purses, cameras in trunks of cars, cameras in PDAs, the list goes on. Most of the cameras also shoot video.

    As a consequence we have many more pictures of police misconduct and celebrity's privates than we ever have in the past, but we have no noticeable increases in the numbers of good UFO pictures (or good sasquatch pics for that matter).

    If the number of UFOs are constant, and there are many more cameras, why aren't we seeing many more pictures flooding the intertubes?

    1. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      The aliens have learned How Not To Be Seen.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cameras in phones, cameras in purses, cameras in trunks of cars, cameras in PDAs, the list goes on. Most of the cameras also shoot video.

      I have a Motorola flip phone made in the past few years and its camera (1.6 megapixel) is complete crap. I've actually tried taking a picture of a low-flying airplane at dusk, and it's all a blur.

      Have a look at this one. It's taken in broad daylight, a slow-moving target, nearly overhead, with an actual 5 megapixel camera. It's point-and-shoot, but was fully extended with its 5X optical zoom. It's really hard to get more than a few pixels out of an object flying only about 5000-7000 ft.

      Yeah, if I had my SLR with a good long, big lens and good low-light film, or a $1000-ish DSLR, I could probably take some good pictures like you describe. Fortunately, Moore's Law should put those kinds of sensors in cell phones within a decade, then maybe we'll see something like you describe.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Images taken by a cameraphone at night are likely to be be blurry and not contain more than a vague approximation of what you see. We have numerous examples of UFO photographs of this nature, however the same kind of image will result if you photograph a street lamp with a slightly shaky hand, so it's difficult to take them seriously.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      >>Fortunately, Moore's Law should put those kinds of sensors in cell phones within a decade

      I hate to sound nitpicky, but unless the laws of physics also change, you will never see those nice images from a lens the size of a split pea or smaller.

      Just saying.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    5. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I hate to sound nitpicky, but unless the laws of physics also change, you will never see those nice images from a lens the size of a split pea or smaller.

      No doubt, metamaterials notwithstanding. But good sensors should at least give better sensitivity and resolution to the minimal-lens cameras. The Global from EFC had a nice 3/4" lens. :)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about this thread for the last few minutes and something did occur to me- In the near-future, cell phones/smart phones will be smart enough to link up and provide high-res photos the same way the VLA and similar arrays do. The only part I can't figure out is how to decide what's worth taking a picture of and who is in control of the network. Something like the British surveillance network would be capable of this soon, but then we're back at square one where only the gov't spooks know about the stuff. If it's real, that is.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    7. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by AhtirTano · · Score: 1

      More people than ever have access to photo manipulation software. If the number of asshats is constant, why aren't we seeing many more faked UFO pictures flooding the web?

    8. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I tried taunting Google into developing something like this a while back. Not yet, but I think it's inevitable.

      I hadn't considered the possibility of skyward-facing cameras, but sure, why not?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      Well, the part I left out was that it used your camera all the time (a la SETI, and unless you happened to be using it) and therefore all the time you might spend with it pressed to your head or laying on a flat surface would offer a view of at least part of the sky, part of the time. This would need to be a massive network to work the way I described. It would probably be cheaper and easier to do by widely placing hundreds of $5 'stickies' with cheap ccds and wireless. Have regional and central servers automatically calibrate ccds' view of the sky wrt the horizon, have the servers recommend new places for ccds for optimal imaging, etc.

      Just daydreaming.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    10. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Ah, I understand. I think battery life is the hardest technical part of the equation.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    11. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1
      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    12. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      How big are the lenses in your eyes?

      --
    13. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by mr3038 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if I had my SLR with a good long, big lens and good low-light film, or a $1000-ish DSLR, I could probably take some good pictures like you describe. Fortunately, Moore's Law should put those kinds of sensors in cell phones within a decade, then maybe we'll see something like you describe.

      Unfortunately, current high quality CCDs are already almost perfect photon counters. The smaller you make the chip, the less surface area you get per pixel and the less photons you have per pixel. The less photons you have per pixel, the more noise the resulting image will have. If you want to have a small lens (and small camera) you have to use a small detector and as a concequence you cannot get very much photons per pixel. The smaller the camera, the worse the image quality. And it will only suffer the more the less light you have. Also notice that Moore's Law will not help here because it only helps with stuffing more on the same area of the chip and here we're limited by the surface area to count photons. The cost of making 1 cm^2 of silicon chip is pretty constant.

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
    14. Re:Why don't we have more pictures of UFOs? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      , current high quality CCDs are already almost perfect photon counters

      I thought most cell phone cameras used CMOS devices due to cost of CCD?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  29. Weird things in the sky by FriendSite.com · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's obviously a lot of skepticism on this site.. however a few years ago I was having a bbq and, before you ask no one had started drinking or smoking anything, but a couple of us saw these silver globes traveling EXTREMELY fast around the clear sky, they (and there was about 8 of them) sped over the horizon and then shot upwards twirling around each other. DEFINITELY not a bird, plane.. photos are: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3251/2959668832_e5abe840d1_b.jpg http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3208/2959668228_778ac7d3d9_o.jpg After seeing these, I'm convinced we're not alone..

    1. Re:Weird things in the sky by Spit · · Score: 1

      I was at a party on the roof of a motel at Bondi beach. No drugs but a couple of beers. I was looking out at the see and the stars and saw some stars way out to sea start moving in a circle. I did a double take and then they shot off one after the other and vanished. I looked around to see if anyone else had seen it, but nobody was looking. I know what I saw.

      --
      POKE 36879,8
  30. Comon UFOs in the 1950s by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Informative

    Where F-94s and F-86Ds.
    The ADC would practice night intercepts on airliners. Those two aircraft where some of the first to have afterburners. The pilots would often light the burner and pull up. Then shut down the burner.
    Strange light making unusual maneuvers then is gone...

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  31. Re:Being British,what are flying American acronyms by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Everyone knows that the actual aliens that visit Britain are quite easy to identify, since they'll usually introduce themselves if asked.

    Though they sometimes introduce themselves by exterminating you.

  32. Re:Being British,what are flying American acronyms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the bad teeth. British aliens all have bad teeth.

  33. Re:Being British,what are flying American acronyms by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

    ... kept busy making corn circles to lure Japanese tourists or those from insubordinate colonies to the fields of Devon!

    Heaven knows there's bugger-all else worth seeing in Devon.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  34. Party balloons by mangu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I once saw something exactly like you describe and your pictures show. I got my telescope and saw an aluminum foil balloon. It was much smaller and nearer than it seemed before I recognized it. It's really funny, how something that seemed like a huge metallic spacecraft flying extremely fast miles away was suddenly diminished to a small child's toy floating at a hundred yards distance.

    1. Re:Party balloons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good explanation. Mind you, there is something very similar that can be seen during laser induced tropospheric ionization. Nothing to do with UFOs of course. See the SDI literature for the interesting details.

    2. Re:Party balloons by GrahamCox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Similar thing happened to me once. I am very much a UFO skeptic (at least skeptical of the 'alien' explanation anyway), but one day I was driving along around dusk and saw what looked like a classic UFO in the sky - cigar shaped, silvery, glowing. It was hovering rather than moving at high speed but its position did change slowly. As I was moving myself and the object held its nominal position, it could only be something large at a distance. I could only get glimpses due to terrain, but I *HAD* to know what it was...

      It took a while before I could turn off the motorway I was on, and then figure out how to get closer to it. It was hard because I didn't have clear sight of it, but luckily it didn't suddenly zoom away as I half expected it to! Eventually I got it - I turned into a gateway to find... a large illuminated blimp attending some sort of sports event.

    3. Re:Party balloons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how sometimes people can see water in the desert, when there is none. But does this mean that you should never see water in the desert ? There are some people who can't be seen as ignorant, lunatic or charlatans who have actually seen some unusual things, with unusual behaviors. If most of us haven't seen them, does this mean that they don't exist ? It's so easy to get narrow minded...

  35. Says you. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    I just had interstellar relations with that radiator woman from the radiator planet.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  36. Re:Being British,what are flying American acronyms by hairykrishna · · Score: 1
    I remember watching a brilliant (BBC I think) documentary on crop circles. The first half was some crop circle 'experts' talking about how a particularly complex circle was obviously constructed by extra terrestrials. Much reading of 'energy meters' and talk of how such a design was only feasible if you could see your work from the air.

    The second half was footage from the night before of a group of cidered up locals constructing the circle with the aid of some lengths of string and wooden planks.

    --
    "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
  37. Better question: "Why do you think we don't?" by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the number of UFOs are constant, and there are many more cameras, why aren't we seeing many more pictures flooding the intertubes?

    You must look in order to see. --This is always the case when it comes to subjects which do not bear the stamp of, "Official Truth".

    There are actually quite a lot of phone camera UFO pictures. Videos, too. --Many tend to be poorly shot and of low resolution, but that's to be expected given that the objects are photographed with crappy cameras at great distances by untrained people. I expect as resolutions on phone cameras get more powerful, we'll also get better images.

    -FL

  38. Think again by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    with the most notable being a sighting in 1991 with a US Air Force pilot's first-hand account. Not that this lends an air of credibility to anything, just more papers with more words.

    Sorry, having an Air Force captain (pilot) describe seeing this *does* lend an air of credibility. The Air Force doesn't let Jim from the trailer park fly their planes.

    1. Re:Think again by s7uar7 · · Score: 1

      The Air Force doesn't let Jim from the trailer park fly their planes

      Why, what's he done?

    2. Re:Think again by raddan · · Score: 1

      But NASA and the Navy are just a bunch of chumps, right?

    3. Re:Think again by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      The Air Force doesn't let Jim from the trailer park fly their planes.

      The Air Force only lets people gullible enough to believe in the moral authority of the United States government fly their planes. Anyone who attains a position of trust or authority in any armed force has shown high suggestibility.

      And let's remember that just last year, the U.S. Air Force loaded live nukes on a B-52 flying across the country. Association with the USAF is not a guarantee of competence.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  39. Actually it makes sense by voss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rectal thermometers are standard in hospitals and rectal probes would be safer for the patient and the alien scientist than oral ones.

    Second if youre doing scientific experiments on a primitive population your not going to raid the population center youll grab somone on an outlying settlement. Plus you would figure the rednecks would have interesting diseases to study.

    1. Re:Actually it makes sense by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      a race that is technologically advanced enough to be capable of FTL-speed travel would not be interested in rednecks, if they cared about humans at all.

      by the time a civilization is capable of intergalactic travel, they would likely be much more culturally advanced than us. no more wars, religion, poverty, disease, social injustice, bigotry, etc. otherwise, they would have destroyed themselves long ago (much like the direction we're headed in).

      so, no, i don't think they would kidnap and probe a redneck. those aren't the trademarks of a culturally/morally advanced civilization. they would either observe us passively and learn about us without interfering with our development, or they would wait for us to mature as a species (i.e. grow out of our current selfish greed-driven, xenophobic, belligerent ways) and then make open contact with us.

    2. Re:Actually it makes sense by gtall · · Score: 1

      So, you've been drinking the alien kool-aid, eh? It might also be the race that makes it here is the meanest bunch of mothers who managed to beat all rivals and it is their will to power that caused them to go out and conquer other civilizations.

      Gerry

    3. Re:Actually it makes sense by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      or they would wait for us to mature as a species (i.e. grow out of our current selfish greed-driven, xenophobic, belligerent ways) and then make open contact with us.

      That is if you assume all life evolves the same way and undergoes the same probable events to come to a common endresult.

      Imagine a square world, the entire conceptualization ability of creatures living on a square world would differ so greatly they might be unable to grasp our sphere shaped one and the implications with al the results.

      Their biology, mathematics and all that would differ: they wouldn't have radiants, they wouldn't use degrees but will have a more firm understanding and derrived knowledge about squares. They won't really know Pi as they might have a hard time conceptualizing circles or spheres.

      Events creating our culture, would have a entire different timeline as well; they might not have the same symbols, ideals, social constructs, "moralities", art or any of that.

      Now, imagine then, to come to a planet, and observe a society, which takes its own references and mental constructs for granted, but for the onlooker, its alien. It's horribly abstract to grasp, and quasi impossible to trace back all those habits and structures which have evolved over the years.

      The same way you find a "redneck" a "lower form of human", they might consider it otherwise.
      Take this thought-experiment; in a place where space is scarce, he who lives in the open might be considered elite. In the same way, you might end up with a preconcept of creatures who are codependant and the ones being independant are considered king. What you find "disgusting" or "lower value" about a redneck is just cultural and is based on your frame of reference, conditioning and what you consider "wealth" or "health". To a species, alien to our, these nuances might be completely lost. Maybe they greet kings by anal probing them, as they can afford to be gay and do not require to fornicate to maintain their reproduction as they can afford some alternative means which might be considered more fashionable or they communicate through anal glands and feel frustrated humans are retartedly hysterical and fart (=screaming) uncontrollably when they try to engage into conversation.

      I think it's an impossible task to conceptualize the unknown with all its probabilities.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    4. Re:Actually it makes sense by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, I suppose it could be aliens expending vast amounts of energy and traveling across distances that the human mind can't even easily comprehend just to do cursory exams of human biology. But may I also suggest the more radical idea that it's just a bunch of ignorant yahoos mistaking a rape nightmare for an anal probe and interpreting simple sleep paralysis as being held down by aliens?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Actually it makes sense by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Imagine an alien race so advanced that they consider humans to be mere animals. We, as a race, have certainly experimented on animals.

    6. Re:Actually it makes sense by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1
      point taken. but what i was mainly referring to is the connection between technological advancement and cultural advancement, not what human social group aliens would perceive as to be superior. consider this:
      1. technology is a result of scientific knowledge--a technologically advanced society is necessarily scientifically advanced.
      2. science is a product of enlightened learning (as opposed to epistemological reliance on mythos).
      3. science is advanced by intellectuals/scholars, not in a vacuum, but is a collaboration between cooperative individuals.
      4. such scientific progress cannot occur in a violent, repressive, reactionary society.
      5. with technological advancement comes great power, and with great power comes great responsibility.--spider-man
      6. a technologically advanced but culturally backward society will destroy itself.

      technology is merely an aspect of culture. and cultural progress happens in lock step. so ethical progress, social progress, scientific progress, and technological progress all must occur simultaneously. these are anthropological laws that all civilizations must follow. consider why most animals have 2 sets (or clumps) of eyes. why do predators have 2 forward-facing eyes, and prey animals 2 opposite-side-facing eyes. that's because binocular vision is required for hunting, whereas eyes on the side of your head gives prey a wider field of vision, thus more protection against predators. these are laws of nature that hold true regardless of where life evolves.

      so imagine an alien species that evolves to be sociopathic brutes. they never discover democracy and have no concept of natural rights, justice, equality, etc. 99% of their population lives abject poverty, condemned to spend their entire lives toiling away performing menial labor. now, imagine an alien species on a different planet that evolves to be altruistic, cooperative, and compassionate beings. they have a democratic form of government, and they do have a concept of natural rights, justice, and equality. because of their progressive culture, they have public schools, public health care, and no poverty.

      now, which one of these species would you expect to develop the technology for space travel? the civilization in which only 1% of the population has the free time to pursue learning & knowledge? or the one in which public schools give all individuals equal access to education? which civilization would have more resources to devote to space travel? the one that has to deal with violent wars, widespread poverty, rampant public health issues, and civil unrest? or the one that has a democratic government, societal stability, and is at peace? and which civilization is more likely to develop advanced scientific understanding such as quantum mechanics, biological evolution, molecular chemistry, etc.? the alien species that has a violent & repressive culture, or the enlightened species whose intellectuals and eccentrics are valued and allowed to flourish?

      think about the kinds of people that advance a society scientifically. were Einstein, da Vinci, Darwin, Copernicus, Tesla, Galileo Galilei, Kepler, Newton, Carl Sagan, Stephen Hawking, etc. violent, sadistic, or belligerent people? did most scientists flock to the United States or the Soviet Union after WWII? and are Universities, our primary institutions of learning, places of reactionary intolerance and anti-social behavior? or do they share free-spirited atmospheres that promote learning and the advancement of knowledge through scientific collaboration?

      i can't speculate much on a 2-dimensional society (i'll leave that job to Edwin Abbott Abbott), but i do think that a spacefaring civilization like Starfleet/The United Federation of Planets is much more probable than a spacefaring species like the Klingons or Cardasians.

    7. Re:Actually it makes sense by turgid · · Score: 1

      Their biology, mathematics and all that would differ: they wouldn't have radiants, they wouldn't use degrees but will have a more firm understanding and derrived knowledge about squares. They won't really know Pi as they might have a hard time conceptualizing circles or spheres.

      But we live on a "round" world and we know all about square and circles (and spheres too).

    8. Re:Actually it makes sense by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      I really like your arguments, I'm trying to see it from your perspective and support your viewpoint.

      Yet I seem to be stuck on the ability to conceptualize and how we're stuck in our own frame of reference, the same way an alien species might be unable to.

      The scientific society always had noble goals and dreams and, as far I'm aware, were minds who had destruction, war and suffering in mind and were searching for a higher truth. The room created for that, has been often war and power though: davinci made war weapons, Einstein wrote the President to warn resulting in the Manhatten project of what I know without further research. Those people weren't violent, yet the room created and their work was stimulated for some of those.

      In some regard, WW2 was the cradle of an entire technology boost, the common directed energy to a common goal (survival, defense, or conquering to maintain wealth, ...) sprouted certain innovations. The romans technology was far advanced, it wasn't very peaceful to the non-romans. Without conflict and all comfort, people wouldn't need new technology or innovation wouldn't be a factor. It seems to me an advanced "law of the fittest", or "most innovative" among humans.

      I wished knowledge and innovation sprouted from a desire for more equality and peace. A cold war and game theory, combined with rocket propulsion (invented to kill people on a distance), did give us the ability to travel to other planets. On the backs of that 1%.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  40. Morons by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    I hung out with journalist John Keel (investigator of the "Mothman" phenomena on which the "Mothman Prophecies" movie with Richard Gere was based) back in the early '70's. Even at that time, he had figured out and convinced me that what was going on with UFOs was far more complex and intricate than mere "alien spacecraft". All the conventional explanations were clearly wrong. Yet, forty years after he began his investigations in the late '60's. most people still think the alternatives are either mundane phenomena or "aliens".

    UFO research has not advanced intelligently in forty years - or sixty years if you count from the original 1947 disk sightings (which, by the way, were just another variant of related phenomena going back thousands of years.)

    My own theory is simply that some protohuman species got smart before humans did, developed technology before humans did, and developed nanotechnology before humans even had any sort of civilization. This theory requires nothing but the realization that there were several protohuman species that existed before humans, and that nanotechnology would eventually lead to the ability to do what these phenomena appear to do. No "aliens" required. What you're looking at when you see a UFO is not an "alien spacecraft" but a Transhuman - or something a Transhuman conjured up for you to look at while it goes about its business.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  41. UK security at its finest by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    Nice to see that all this material has been kept safe so long while mundane crap like the proles' names,addresses,social security numbers, bank account numbers, passport data etc ad nauseum get left in every train carriage and taxi in the land.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  42. What about Edgar Mitchell then? by meist3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree to the assumption that we can't possibly be the only sentient species in the universe and given there were a few million years to evolve why shouldn't have something come up with better ways of generating energy? Not every species is as retarded as ours...

  43. Money talks, alien walks, warp drive torques ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Millionaire internet entrepreneur Joe Firmage (he cashed in before the dotcom credit crash) has plenty to say about UFOs!

  44. A Moderation Haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The insightful mod
    Although very useful sometimes
    Should not be used now.

    1. Re:A Moderation Haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      When writing haiku
      Use seventeen syllables
      I counted eighteen

    2. Re:A Moderation Haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When writing haiku
      Just STFU instead
      Haiku is teh ghey

  45. Nah nah by golodh · · Score: 1
    It just so happens that I *know* that Aliens are all over our planet.

    How do I know? Well ... you hear too many accounts of sightings for it not to be true. Where there is smoke there is fire. Am I right?

    And the fact that we don't see more accounts of this in the mainstream media and that declassified reports don't mention them only means that there's a huge conspiracy to suppress all the evidence.

    So there!

    1. Re:Nah nah by yahwotqa · · Score: 1

      Where there is smoke there is fire. Am I right?

      No, sometimes there really is just smoke.

  46. While we're discussing UFO theries... by Jorophose · · Score: 1

    (Of whatever origin they may be)...

    When I was a kid and we used to make annual or even bi-annual trips down to see my grandmother and my uncles, my dad would tell me all sorts of stories about when he was younger, things like Soviet weapons tests over the Mediterranean, projects in the US & Canada (and things like the flower planting projects along Texas highways), along with other more random things...

    My dad's not the kind of person to think UFO = aliens, but UFO = americans thinking outside the box. For all I know he's worked on some of these projects... Well, one of the things he told me about, was what he thought the USAF was up to... And this is some interesting stuff. So he's talking to me about airspaces, and how 50,000+ (or was it 500k?) is gvt-only, and past that is space... Well, he started talking about how you could judge a plane's direction (headed for Cuba, LA, England, or just to Chicago) based on its size in the sky (guessing at how high up it was based on things like airspaces)...

    And he mentions to me this: that the US army likely has giant planes, floating around, with big plasma (or LCD or w/e) screens attached at the bottom, used to reflect what's above down below. So for non-government onlookers, nothing is there. But, go up into gvt-airspace, or out in to space, and tada! Giant airship! Able to stay in the sky fairly long; maybe not nuclear-powered, but maybe refueled from other planes, or simply refueled remotely and "carried up"...

    Just was curious to see what people thought of it. Maybe this is why only the Russians seem to do commercial space travel and often it's a warned-far-in-advance sort of thing, with you up in space for only a couple of days? (I think. maybe longer to wait for another shuttle?)

    1. Re:While we're discussing UFO theries... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      And he mentions to me this: that the US army likely has giant planes, floating around, with big plasma (or LCD or w/e) screens attached at the bottom, used to reflect what's above down below. So for non-government onlookers, nothing is there. But, go up into gvt-airspace, or out in to space, and tada! Giant airship! Able to stay in the sky fairly long; maybe not nuclear-powered, but maybe refueled from other planes, or simply refueled remotely and "carried up"...

      This would not work. Consider: you have your secret airship, and beneath it you hang a giant screen on which you show an image of the sky. If you make the image good enough, an observer directly below would notice nothing. What about an observer off to one side? He'd see a distorted image. What about an observer so far off to one side that your airship is hanging low in the sunset? He sees your secret giant airship plain and clear, and the giant screen hanging below it too. So maybe you have screens all over the surface in every direction? That too might work... but not when you're viewed from an angle placing you near the Sun. Your screens aren't that bright.

      It would be far simpler to paint the airship sky blue and fly it above the clouds. You'd run into another problem at night, as some observers would see it occult the stars, or silhouetted against the moon. And of course if any astronomer on the ground happens to be doing an infrared survey, he'll see you bright as day - all your secret machinery and engines must produce waste heat. You'd have to move the thing around quite frequently.

      But when you get right down to it, why would you bother? What are you doing with this airship? Surveillance, photography? You can do that with satellites. Perhaps you have bombs on board to drop on people? You have plenty of those on submarines, which are far easier to hide. Or is it full of planes? That's what aircraft carriers are for.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:While we're discussing UFO theries... by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      Maybe for fun?

      But then again, remember this appears as a tiny spec to the vast majority of people; it's in gvt airspace.

      Then consider you're not likely going to be seeing it at night; they could always go and hide at Alert, or down south.

      I mean, I don't know why you'd want one, but it looks fun and remotely useful so why not? And really in what situations are you going to be looking sideways at something in gvt airspace? In a commercial jet? I can barely see right out the window; and I'm going to look over head some thousands of feet?

      Maybe it just floats around observing things. Most photography is done via planes, not satellites; I know Google does that. I doubt you'd have bombs, that would ruin the point of it.

  47. open invitation now by beyoutofulllive.com · · Score: 1

    http://10-14-08redux.blogspot.com/ Creating and manifesting the new timeline

  48. We have reached the limits of what rectal probing by bussdriver · · Score: 3, Funny

    On earth the highest order creatures use rectal "probing" more than the lower creatures. It only stands to reason that more advanced creatures would have an even greater interest on rectal probing than us humans.

  49. Re:Cause & Effect - D.M.T. by six025 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is also worth reading "DMT - The Spirit Molecule" by Dr. Rick Strassman.

    Dimethyltryptamine is the most powerful hallucinogenic known to man, and the book concerns the study of the effects DMT has on the human mind. During the experiements he discovers that the "alien abduction experience" can be recreated "at will" by administering relatively high doses of DMT.

    DMT occurs naturally in the human brain and is regulated by the pineal gland - we are all taking a dose of the schedule one drug right now.

    From this we can determine that perhaps the "alien abduction experience" is built in to us at some level, and that those who experience it have somehow triggered a flood of DMT.

    Peace,
    Andy.

  50. wake up people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you all are amazing. I thought slashdot would have a more open minded group of readers than this. UFOS ARE REAL and I know it because I have seen them. Why is everyone so full of themselves to not even consider the possibility? I thought intelligent people came here , not a bunch of elitist know-it alls.

  51. UFO Disclosure project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have 2 hours to spend: UFO Disclosure project http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUk

  52. It's a GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY!!!!! by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    Anybody who drinks enough Windex will se a UFO, flashing lights and all.

    Keep in mind, "UFO"s are anything that flys and cannot be identified. This means that *anything* that flies anywhere and cannot be ID'd is technically a UFO.

    Just because you, or anybody else cannot ID something flying doesn't mean that is a spaceship.

    Personally, I'd recommend laying off of the whiskey and "Duck Dodgers" reruns for a while.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  53. skeptical about the brown missile-shaped object by stoofa · · Score: 1

    The captain of the Alitalia airliner shouted "Look out" to his co-pilot at the sight of a brown missile-shaped object shooting past them overhead.

    Sounds like a big piece of shit to me.

  54. Advanced aliens = friendly aliens by Macka · · Score: 1

    No alien civilization is expending the mammoth amount of resources needed to traverse the vast distances of interstellar space just to stick a probe up your ass. Deal with it.

    That really is the crux of it as I see things.

    We're only likely to see the appearance of benevolent aliens if their technology is so advanced that inter-galactic travel is relatively cheap: in both cost and time. Thus their motivation is more likely to be for scientifiy study, cultural exchange or perhaps trade.

    Any alien race who is not as advanced and who have to spend huge resources to make a long drawn out journey here, is only going to do so if there's something worthwhile in it for them at the end of the trip. i.e. a hunt for new resources, living space, etc. And they would be more inclined to take what they're after to justify the effort, time and expense.

    Having said that, why would any benevolent alien race really want to make contact and establish relations with us? We can hardly offer them peace and friendship without risk to themselves, as we can't even work out how to co-exist with other members of our own species without resorting to violence.

    Maybe in 500 years or so, when all countries in the world have grown out of their current tendancies for feudal self interest, and are more focused on mutual economic security, then we'll we fit to interact with any benevolent aliens that (might) exist.

    Not in our lifetime though.

     

  55. Have you heard about this? by Airw0lf · · Score: 1

    Have you heard of the "Kaikoura Lights?"

    Another well-documented UFO case with plenty of independent verification from multiple reliable witnesses in different locations, along with air traffic control, etc.

    Too bad you posted as AC...let me know if you want to hear more. There is not that much out there on the net about it.

    P.S. I am not 100% sure whether aliens or whatever were responsible, but there was definitely some crazy shit going on!

  56. at what speed did the joke WOOSH over your head? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure they were referring to velocity, not temperature, since it was in reference to the "illuminated target speed indicator" and 300Km/s over 10 seconds is over 3,000 g.

    Really? You're pretty sure? Thanks for the heads up!

  57. Re:Cause & Effect - D.M.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you need to read that book again. DMT is not the most powerful hallucinogen, nor are we "taking a dose ... right now"
    Some might subjectively find the experience more powerful than other drugs, but objectively, the active dose is higher than, say, LSD or Salvinorin A. It occurs as an intermediary in meletonin production, but is rapidly converted to other substances. It is possible that for some unknown reason large amounts could accumulate in rare occurrences, and Strassman speculates that this might explain alien abductions and other hallucinatory religious experiences, but there is currently no evidence that it does.

  58. Well, that's less than stellar news... by wmduncan · · Score: 1

    Well, it is...

  59. Re:Cause & Effect - Venus is after me by deadweight · · Score: 1

    Venus can look like a bright aircraft landing light coming right at you. You change course 30 degrees and it moves 30 degees, but still keeps a constant bearing - therefore STILL coming right at you. You climb or descend and it STILL lines up right at you! Then you call ATC and they don't see traffic for 100 miles in that direction. Then someone else advises you that the planet Venus is after you and you are so embarassed that you don't talk to anyone for the next hour.

  60. Ideas come in different scents. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Here's three:

    1. The Queen of England is a lizard in a human costume.
    2. The Earth is only 5000 years old and the bible is verbatim truth.
    3. The Earth is Flat.
    4. The "Photon Belt" is coming along with the hollow Nibiru/Planet X filled with alien troops.
    5. Elvis is still alive.

    To me, those kinds of ideas resonate on the frequency of 'Bullshit'. --And I'm not (just) saying that facetiously. They really DO feel/sound/smell lame in a way which I can't quite put my finger on, but which I can sense from a mile away as being simply wrong. This does not stop many people from believing them, however, which suggests to me that not everybody knows how to use their nose, so to speak.

    By contrast, I find that alternate/invisible levels of reality over-lapping ours and traversed by non-human beings visible to us via the near-ubiquitous UFO reports (among other things) in fact doesn't fail my smell-test. There's just something about it all which resonates differently than Elvis.

    The mountains of evidence in all its variety also helps to make it convincing. --Though I sometimes think that to dissuade people with well-tuned noses, there is a hefty effort put forth to 'Elvis-ify' the UFO phenomenon by painting it with the same brush as that other nonsense.

    Then there are those who don't do any sniff-testing at all, but just believe and react the way they are told to. While it may appear to be a subtle difference, (it's not actually that subtle except to those who are so embroiled), there IS a difference between the smell-test, and measuring something against one's library of accepted facts and experiencing an automatic negative emotional response against anything which isn't in the official card catalog.

    Anyway. . , when I give the albeit cool-sounding plasma-tv airship idea offered up by your father the smell-test, it doesn't do so well.

    -FL

    1. Re:Ideas come in different scents. by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      However, there is one thing that saves it:

      The technology is there. The only issue is powering it.

      I mean, sure, why the hell would you want it? But then again it could just be for epeen.

  61. skeptic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ufos monitor and land in areas of lesser technology and intelligence so the scrutiny holds less value.