Slashdot Mirror


New Gadget Blocks 'Spam' Phone Calls

Smivs writes "The BBC report on a new gizmo that can block/filter spam phone calls. The system basically intercepts all calls. If it recognizes them as a friend or a member of the user's family — numbers on the so-called star list created by the user — it lets them through as normal. If the caller's number is on a zap list — numbers of telemarketers or other nuisance callers — the device answers it, and all future calls from that number, with an automated message which means the phone does not ring at all. If the system doesn't recognize the caller's number, or the caller withholds their number, it asks them who they are, puts them on hold and then rings the user's phone. The user has the option of taking the call, having the system take a message, or they can reject the call and add the number to the 'zap' list. Users can add callers to their 'star' list by pressing the star button on their phone at any point during a call." So wait, they can't spam me twice? If I press a button? And if they actually show their phone number on my caller ID? What about the auto insurance scammers that hit me 10x/week?

274 comments

  1. Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The only criticism that I have is that it rings my phone at all (for an unrecognized number). I would prefer a system where an unknown caller (those not on the white list) has to first identify themselves as a real person (by keying some numbers) and then leave a message. The phone should only actually ring for whitelisted callers, everyone else should have to prove themselves human for the privilege of leaving a message.

    The most annoying calls now are the "robo-calls." What really infuriates me about them is that I can't seem to hang up on them (if you try to hang up and pick up the phone later, the message is still playing). This pisses me off because it means that my phone company is somehow in cahoots with these bastards and is essentially letting them hijack my phone line without my permission. What if I needed to make an emergency call and had to wait for the robo-call to go through all its "great offers" before I could even dial out?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Spazztastic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only criticism that I have is that it rings my phone at all (for an unrecognized number). I would prefer a system where an unknown caller (those not on the white list) has to first identify themselves as a real person (by keying some numbers) and then leave a message.

      This would be a great option for it, however it could be looked at as annoying for the caller. The reason I got rid of my land line when I moved is because of all of the telemarketers, robo-calls, etc. It got to the point where I wouldn't answer unless I recognized the number anyway. If it was an important call, they would probably leave a message anyway.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    2. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by theaveng · · Score: 1

      It's a lot easier to just put your name on a Do Not Call list. Since I've done that I've had virtually zero telemarketer calls.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    3. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by fotbr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That works great, except for all the organizations that managed to get themselves exempted from the Do Not Call list. Political campaigns being the biggest offender. And retards from both sides are calling 1-2 times an hour from about 7-9pm almost every evening since August. Isn't living in a swing-state fun?

    4. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I *am* on the "do not call list." I still get at least two or three of these calls a day. They just masquerade themselves as "surveys" or non-profits (or give me the "We are calling on behalf of your credit card company to tell you about this great offer..." line) to get around the do not call list.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by theaveng · · Score: 1

      I live in the swing state of Pennsylvania and have not noticed a barrage of calls. Actually just one from McCain and that's it.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    6. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've been using Vonage for quite awhile now, signed up for the do not call registry, and if I don't recognize the number or it is not shown, I simply do not answer. Life has been much simpler doing that.

      Truly, if it is important they will leave a message. I refuse to let my life be ruled by the ringing of a phone or the whims of another person who wants my attention. Leave a message, I'll get back to you ... sometime... if you're nice.

    7. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      Yep, make any non-whitelisted caller enter a random three-digit number before they are connected. That will get rid of any robo-callers and probably a lot of annoying spammers who couldn't be bothered to keep keying in numbers each time...

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    8. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see it made a felony to have a computer instigate a call. Who's with me?

    9. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got stopped by one of these things because my Skype number didn't display correctly on their end.

      Some recording answered and said, "Please state where you are calling from."

      "Uhmmmm ... what????"

      "Thank you, please hold .... still trying .... still trying .... still trying ...."

      Finally a voice on the other end, "Hi, who is this?"

      "Uhmmm ... Hi Sandy... what the hell is that thing?"

    10. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by gid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Annoying for the caller? Too fucking bad. If you can't be bothered to enter the numbers, then I can't be bothered to answer the call.

      I've always dreamed about such a device, basically a little captcha for the phone. I work from home and get tons of robo calls, and even if it's not a robot talking on the phone, marketing firms usually have some machine dialing the call and then hand it off to someone once the machine determines there's a human on the line. Ever wonder why you say hello and it takes the person on the other end a few seconds to respond? That's why. Phone captcha would eliminate these calls... at least for awhile until someone beats the captcha.

    11. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Emb3rz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not I.

      I'd like to have certain programs of mine call my cell phone to alert me to problems with pre-recorded messages. So far I've been too lazy to adapt them to do such, but my point is that this is something I would consider useful. By no stretch of the imagination do I believe it should ever be considered a felony to automatically contact a person.

    12. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by GalacticCmdr · · Score: 5, Informative

      The most annoying calls now are the "robo-calls." What really infuriates me about them is that I can't seem to hang up on them (if you try to hang up and pick up the phone later, the message is still playing). This pisses me off because it means that my phone company is somehow in cahoots with these bastards and is essentially letting them hijack my phone line without my permission. What if I needed to make an emergency call and had to wait for the robo-call to go through all its "great offers" before I could even dial out?

      I write robo-call software and when something like that happens it is the fault of your local carrier. Many of the local carriers in the US have been getting lazy about sending the proper signals when a connection is disconnected. It is up to the carriers to send this signal. I can regularly call my boss' landline and get a difference of 30 seconds between when he hangs up and when I finally get the signal has been disconnected.

      --
      Programming: Its not just a job - its an indenture.
    13. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holding the line more than 15 seconds(I think, maybe 20) is a violation of FCC rules. The problem is that you have to be able to report the real number to the FCC and since they hide the number, that's not going to be easy.

      I got to report our local water company because their system wouldn't drop the line. When they called back I asked to speak to their supervisor and then informed him of the violation. The only thing he wanted to know was if they were calling the right person so I asked for his full name so I could give it to the FCC since he didn't seem worried about the $100,000+ fine they could receive. Needless to say he wasn't about to go giving it to me but they never had that problem ever again. I don't know if they did it on their own or if the FCC actually checked them out but it worked like a charm.

      BTW, I had the idea from TFA long before this came out and it simply used an Asterisk system(or the like).

    14. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Ender_Stonebender · · Score: 1

      While I see your point, I kind of agree with the other poster who replied.

      What I want is a system where when I press the # and * buttons on the phone simultaneously, the phone company sends 10 million volts (AC, at 120Hz, please) through the line to the device on the other end. This will not only get rid of robo-dialers, but also fax machines dialing the wrong number repeatedly and most telemarketers. (The ones that are selling a product people actually want might survive. Maybe. I'm not really sure - and I don't really care.)

      --
      Loose things are easy to lose. You're getting your hair cut. They're going there to see their aunt.
    15. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by maxume · · Score: 1

      How about a misdemeanor for automatically calling someone without a prior agreement?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    16. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by grub · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have a similar box (Caller ID Manager) from PrivacyCorps.com which intercepts the first ring and checks the caller ID. We have a Panasonic wireless setup with 4 handsets from which the base station is fed from the CID unit. Bad CID? We never even get that first ring. The call is routed to another plug on the device where we have an answering machine telling the caller we don't take calls from their number.

      We've blocked all 800, 866, 888, 000, 123-456-7890, etc. The thing works beautifully.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    17. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by xerxesVII · · Score: 5, Funny

      I write robo-call software...

      I'd like to take a moment to thank you for your tireless efforts to make the world a better place.

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    18. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Emb3rz · · Score: 1

      Much less unreasonable.

      On the other hand, another one of my clearly brilliant ideas for a program was one that would send out party/event/meeting invitations. You could select any number of methods to contact people. In fact, one of the features would have been to use an existing address book (Outlook, Gmail, whatever) and contact them in the first most preferred fashion available. For instance, Email if they had it, or if not then IM, then telephone, then if only a postal address was available, print out a letter/card/whatever for them.

      So again, this would be a useful application (probably harmless, as well) for contacting people automatically via telephone. And in this scenario, it seems unlikely you would have asked your friends/congregation/colleagues ahead of time whether it was okay for you to use this channel to contact them.

    19. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by maxume · · Score: 1

      It is relatively harmless, but given that we have any number of non real time communication systems, I find it grating when someone thinks they need to use a system that is designed to demand my immediate attention just to send my some automated notice.

      I would hope that users of your clearly brilliant system would mostly fail to schedule annoying phone calls for their friends.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    20. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Emb3rz · · Score: 3, Funny

      <Zybl0re> get up
      <Zybl0re> get on up
      <Zybl0re> get up
      <Zybl0re> get on up
      <phxl|paper> and DANCE
      * nmp3bot dances :D-<
      * nmp3bot dances :D|-<
      * nmp3bot dances :D/-<
      <[SA]HatfulOfHollow> i'm going to become rich and famous after i invent a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet

      Prior art. ;)

    21. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by chinakow · · Score: 1

      that would make faxing a real pain in the ass. Also, a felony? Taking away someone's right to vote because they are an ass? I sort of like the idea but I want to see how the term ass is defined once it has been through a committee or two.

    22. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by FridgeFreezer · · Score: 1

      I doubt the phone co are in cahoots, there are standard signalling methods you can use to hold the line open.

      Emergency operators have the facility to seize the line to make sure it stays open.

      The fact the marking co are using this is either really cheeky or plain against the rules, I'd ask your telco if they're supposed to be allowing it, it could be as simple as a misconfigured service to the marketing co that they're exploiting.

      --
      There is no music - home taping killed it.
    23. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see it made a felony to have a computer instigate a call. Who's with me?

      How about a mandatory nominal connection fee (like 5 cents or something) per call, paid from the caller to the reciever. wouldn't affect your grandmother calling to wish you a merry christmas, but would probably deter cold callers making '00000s of calls.

    24. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by scotts13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Best way to avoid this is to never register to vote. Cuts way back on the political calls (mailings, too.) I've never received either.

    25. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a lot easier to just put your name on a Do Not Call list. Since I've done that I've had virtually zero telemarketer calls.

      Well, good for you. I've been on the DNC list since it came out and I get on average two calls per day. One company (except charity) has been calling me twice a week for a year now. Yes, I've told them over and over to stop calling. Another company that calls about once a week finally got shut down (I saw it on the news). It took less than a month for identical calls to start up again. I don't know what your definition of virtually zero is, but I just want to be able to tell people to never call me again and for them to stop calling me when I do.

    26. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by KeX3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "And you, sir, are worse than Hitler."

    27. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I've always dreamed about such a device, basically a little captcha for the phone.

      Been able to do this with Asterisk for a long time now. Only reason I haven't implemented it is that I can't find a usable card for a decent price. The old "use so-and-so modem" trick has proven more risk than reward. :(

    28. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Or the telemarketers who are just flat-out illegal anyway. For example, I get calls for that "extended auto warranty" crap on my cell phone!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    29. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by mc4bbs · · Score: 1

      Amen!! I also have Vonage and work under the same principle.

    30. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by lysergic.acid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      VoIP is definitely the way to go. we really shouldn't need to purchase/install another device just to have automated control over our phone line. seems like with an open VoIP standard and an open source VoIP handset, you could just program such behavior directly into the phone. there's really no need for special hardware.

      the other thing to do is regulate cold-calling (whether commercial or political/non-profit). force all automated cold-callers to be registered in an online database. when you receive a cold call, the caller will send you its number/ID that your VoIP phone will automatically look up on the online database and handle the call appropriately (e.g. hang-up/block all commercial calls, or take a message if it's a non-profit caller and save the voice message to a special inbox).

      VoIP systems can also be easily extended. for instance, you can require anonymous callers to enter a password that you'd only give out to friends. that way if a friend needs to reach you from an anonymous line they can still get by your call filter. you just can't do this type of thing with traditional cellular or landlines because they're on proprietary networks.

    31. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      My university recently implemented an emergency warning that would violate that law.

      However, I agree with you, if it were amended to say "...without prior, explicit written consent." Of course, the real issue is, how would you enforce such a thing? All the telemarketing calls I get are illegal anyway (on several levels, since I only use a cell phone), but I don't see anything getting done about them.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    32. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      If you gave your permission for a computer to call it would be allowed. Fax spam is even worse, if you fax me without my permission you should do twice the time you would for just having your computer put me on hold because your inflated sense of self-importance makes you think your time is more valuable than mine, because I PAY FOR HE GODDAMNED PAPER.

    33. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by supernova_hq · · Score: 4, Funny

      I write robo-call software

      Of all the times not to hit the "Post Anonymous" check box.

    34. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      a phone captcha would be annoying and probably easier to beat than text captchas. I have a hard enough time understanding foreign tech support personal nevermind things that are intentionally difficult to understand.

      You want to know what works better than anything else and will guarantee to get rid of all your spam calls?

      Tell them you're on a cellphone... it's that simple. The way the laws are setup they can spam you all they want as long as it isn't costing you money, it doesn't technically cost you anything to receive junk mail nor does it technically cost you anything to receive a call on a lan line... it DOES cost you to receive a call on your cellphone, so it's off limits less they want to pay you for it.

      A typical conversation if I get a RARE telemarketer call... them: "do you have a few minutes to consider an offer concerning X"... me: "that depends, are you going to pay me for this call?"... them: "..." me: "this is a cell phone, this call costs me money"... them:"I'm sorry we will not call this number again." CLICK

      The beauty of it is that with all the phone tech that rings in the office first and transfers to your cell... and the ability to have your number moved from a LAN line to a cell phone means that you can just LIE to them on a LAN line and tell them it's a Cell...

      I've never registered for the DNC list but I started telling all the telemarketers I'm using a cell, even when I'm not and I want to say it's been a good 6+ months now since I've received an unwarranted call from anyone.

    35. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Informative

      I work from home and get tons of robo calls, and even if it's not a robot talking on the phone, marketing firms usually have some machine dialing the call and then hand it off to someone once the machine determines there's a human on the line. Ever wonder why you say hello and it takes the person on the other end a few seconds to respond? That's why. Phone captcha would eliminate these calls... at least for awhile until someone beats the captcha.

      Buy a Telezapper.
      http://www.telezapper.com/

      When you (or your answering machine) picks up the phone, the telezapper plays a dialtone.
      Humans just hear a tone, auto-dialers interpret it as "this line has been disconnected"

      I got one for my parents, long before the Do Not Call list and after around a month, as your number gets taken off of auto-dialing lists, it makes a huge difference in the volume of calls that come in.

      You can also do it, like I did for myself, by recording the tone onto the beginning of an answering machine message, but the telezapper works whenever you pick up the phone. So if you're fine with letting every "unknown number" go to the answering machine (my parents were not) you can implement the Telezapper's $40 functionality for free.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    36. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Back when I actually answered my land line, if I ever heard total silence on the other end, I would not say anything and just wait. The telemarketer computer generally hung up after a few seconds.

      These days, my phones are set to not ring, I have no voicemail/answering machine, and I don't answer it. People who know me call my cell phone. The landline is generally for outbound calls only.

      I was seriously considering getting this product: http://www.privacycorps.com/products/?id=4 though they seem to be perpetually out of stock.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    37. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by nacturation · · Score: 1

      [...] receive a call on a lan line [...] have your number moved from a LAN line [...] you can just LIE to them on a LAN line [...]

      The first one I thought was just a typo, but it's landline and has nothing to do with Local Area Networks.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    38. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by GalacticCmdr · · Score: 1, Informative

      I write robo-call software

      Of all the times not to hit the "Post Anonymous" check box.

      Why? I take a great deal of pride in the work that I have done on this software. Currently with minimal resources my code can sustain about 2000 simultaneous calls all day long. We also do bulk emails, pagers, and faxes with IMs happening sometime next year.

      There is a difference between taking pride in the code as written and the way it is used. However, on that second point I have no complaints either. Our customers are first responders, government entities, and businesses (of the non-telemarketer variety). We send out school closings, drug/food recalls, hospital/doctor reminder calls, pharmacy pickup reminders, school absentee notifications, amber alerts, and emergency alerts.

      The only slightly yuck moment came when the CTO put forward the idea (which was shot down) to sell time slices of our system to make calls for American Idol. One the evil scale that is Dr. Horrible level at best.

      I would post the name of my company, but our poor corporate server would last only seconds against Slashdot.

      --
      Programming: Its not just a job - its an indenture.
    39. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Soruk · · Score: 3, Informative

      I do this on my Asterisk system by having an answering machine on my POTS line give out an 0870 (expensive to call) number that forwards to my VoIP phone number. My friends and family have the real number (so don't pay the 0870 call rate). The ringer is switched off (as is the speaker) on my answerphone so I don't hear it ring, it doesn't disturb me and the call spammers don't generally like to call 0870 numbers. It's a win-win. :)

      Also, whocallsme.com is a very useful site in looking up the caller IDs of call spammers, and isn't restricted to USA or UK.

      --
      -- Soruk
    40. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by theaveng · · Score: 1

      Then you need to get their company name and location, and file a complaint in small claims. You can get $500 per call if they violate your "do not call" rights.

      Or you can complain on the do-not-call website, which is easier, but won't net you any money.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    41. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      My mom was targeted by scammers, and I tried the so-and-so modem for a while and I added the scam callers numbers one by one. The callers still got through because they knew she'd answer if they kept calling because callerID doesn't show up on the first ring. After my mom got taken in by scammers despite my best efforts, I built her an Asterisk machine and we added a blacklist. The analog card cost more than the box to run it on, but it's worth it. Her blacklist means the call never rings. She has had no trouble using an Aastra IP phone that I can program from my house with quickdials for family and friends. (I also built a couple of pfSense embedded systems for the IPSec tunnel between our house. I had previously built an Asterisk box at home because SIP service is $5/month with it rather than $30/month with Vonage.) The problem is that new numbers will call that you haven't added to the blacklist. So we changed her number to a new, unlisted, unpublished number. All calls are monitored and the records kept for two weeks. If it happens again, we'll have more evidence. What we need is a distributed blacklist just like we use for spam servers. It wouldn't be hard to do this for Asterisk systems, but most home phones can't do it. Building it into devices like the Linksys/Sipura PAP2T would be the "killer app" that makes SIP services popular.

    42. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea but I'm afraid it won't ever happen as it would not only put the telemarketers out of business (and I bet this is a pretty powerful lobby if only for the number of people they employ), it would cost the phone companies revenue as less calls are made.

      And this would also assume the telemarketers would follow the rules and publish their numbers correctly and so...

    43. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Well then know this.... my policy... if an automated system calls me and tells me to hold. I hang up. If you can't be bothered to have a real person on the phone from the moment that I pick up, then you obviously don't need to talk to me that bad.

      I find it absolutely infuriating to get a call like that. You ring my phone, thus interrupting whatever I am doing, and then... tell me to hold for you? Who the hell do you think I think you are?

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    44. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      They're not violating the do not call law. They're just taking advantage of loopholes for non-profits, survey calls, political calls, and companies you've done business with in the last 90 days.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    45. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Make it five bucks, you could give granny her fiver back.

    46. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think there is a simple solution. I am preparing to impliment, its just that it has some potential problems if it doesn't work right, so I want to be careful.

      So I only have my cell phone. So I am thinking... I set unknown numbers to no ring at all. Then put the outgoing message on my voice mail "This number does not accept ANY calls from unknown numbers. It doesn't even ring. You may unblock caller ID and call back."

      Then, if I do get any annoyance calls with numbers, just save them, and give them a custom ringtone of none.

      I can't see any problems with the plan. Can you?

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    47. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by genner · · Score: 1

      Don't you think you are stretching things just a wee bit too far?

      Nope sounds about right.

    48. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by genner · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would post the name of my company, but our poor corporate server would last only seconds against Slashdot.

      In that case just post a phone number.

    49. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Having your own computer call you should be legal, and having a computer call with your permission should be legal, but it REALLY pisses me off when I answer the phone at work (I don't have a home landline, just a cell) and a goddamned computer asks me to hold for some asshat who thinks his time is more valuable than mine.

      I just hang up. They can go to hell (and probably will).

    50. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by GalacticCmdr · · Score: 1

      I'd like to take a moment to thank you for your tireless efforts to make the world a better place.

      Thanks, and here I thought all my long hours and years of experience writing online gambling and delinquent bill collection software would go to waste. Maybe if I am lucky I can move up the ladder and write software automatically identify stressed mortgages and purchase them at fire sale prices from the banks so they can be foreclosed and re-sold - I heard that market is hot right now. :)

      Seriously, those were my two previous positions. Dealing with the Colombian gambling interests was a very unique experience and my boss never seemed to tire of telling bad "necktie" jokes. The Colombians themselves were great, but dealing with currency really sucked. I had to take US Dollars, Colombian pesos, Euros, and Company Script (mixed within the same transaction) into the register - place all bets in US Dollars (with US and Caribbean Companies) - payoff all winners in whatever mix of currency they wanted. Of course, the drawer had to balance at the end of the shift.

      --
      Programming: Its not just a job - its an indenture.
    51. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      The callers still got through because they knew she'd answer if they kept calling because callerID doesn't show up on the first ring

      Here in the UK, the CLID comes through BEFORE the first ring, which opens up some unique possibilities. (its what is used to also handle SMS over Landlines)

      --
      Have a nice day!
    52. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by TavisJohn · · Score: 1

      I used to have a computer app that filtered my land line calls. It would receive the caller ID info, and if they were on my black list it would pickup and hangup. If they were on my white list, the computer would play a chime to let me know it was someone "important". And if they were not on either list it would do nothing.

      I would love to have another app like this (The original one stopped working on Windows 98, it only worked on W95) but have additional features like requiring people not on either black or white lists to type a code on their phone to prove they are a person and have them, "Ring Through".

      I loved Having a Treo as a cellphone for the 3rd party apps, I had a call filter on that. If the caller blocked their ID, Pickup and hangup with a silent ringer. (Black list people got the same treatment).

    53. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put people in jail for stealing resources from others without permission? We do that for just about everything else. If you steal a ream of paper you might go to jail. If you fax 1000K reams of paper you should to to jail for a long time. Personally I think felons should always be allowed to vote otherwise they're just political prisoners.

    54. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      No it is simpler than that, have an cold calling *opt in* system

      If I have not opted in and you cold call me to sell me something I report you, you automatically get a £1000 fine, no ifs no buts

      We already have a do not call list both in the US and UK, companies should be hit hard for phoning people on it, automatically without having to chase the phone company or resorting to the courts

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    55. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For US landlines, that is strictly illegal. Automated phone calls MUST free the line within a few seconds (don't have exact spec). This was put into law for the two reasons you mentioned.

      Log a complaint with the FCC.

    56. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ...

      Robo callers that you can't hang up
      Telemarketers that fake CLI
      Exemptions from the Do not call list ... I knew there was a reason I lived in the UK

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    57. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      NICE!

      I really like that idea. My business line is a "expensive to call" line, where I make money when people actually call it, that just forwards to a regular line. NICE!

      I'm really going to look into this.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    58. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      What really infuriates me about them is that I can't seem to hang up on them (if you try to hang up and pick up the phone later, the message is still playing).

      That's not any special function of the caller, or any collaboration with your teleco - in any call, once it's been accepted, only the person who dialed the call can end it. Just try hanging up on someone who has accidentally speed-dialed you while their 'phone is still in their back pocket; pick up the 'phone two minutes later and they'll still be there.

    59. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by sootman · · Score: 1

      Before someone invents (and uses) a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet I'd like to mention that my kid's school uses robo-calls to inform us of upcoming events (end of the quarter, statewide testing days, etc.) and it's great so let's give him the benefit of the doubt. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    60. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Salgak1 · · Score: 1
      We've told both campaigns, the next call we get from their campaign is an automatic vote of all four votes in our house for the other guy. Then, in my best "Dirty Harry" imitiation, I told each one:

      "Do you feel lucky ? Well, do ya, punk ??"

      Blessed silence from both campaigns ever since. . .

    61. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      Here in Southern California, The incumbent Rep. David Drier has been spamcalling everybody with some "stay on the line to be connected to a LIVE town hall meeting" Which by the way is a Listen only connection. However Myself and a number of my friends who also live in his district have called his main campaign office and told them that we are voting him out SOLELY for his telephone campaign policy.

    62. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by stfvon007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      At work whenever a telemarketer calls, we switch the sound system over to a cd of "Never gonna give you up" and put the phone next to a speaker.

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    63. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by legirons · · Score: 1

      It's a lot easier to just put your name on a Do Not Call list. Since I've done that I've had virtually zero telemarketer calls.

      So you're on the DNC list and you still get telemarketer calls? Not really working then is it?

    64. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't we all send him a thank-you message:

      AOL IM: GalacticCmdr
      Yahoo! ID: GalacticCmdr001
      Jabber: GalacticCmdr

    65. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by mkraft · · Score: 1

      The problem is that they spoof the caller id number and if you ask them for their company name and location they hang up on you. So there's no way to get that info.

    66. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Zibblsnrt · · Score: 1

      The few telemarketers who are actually bound by the rules of the do not call registries might stop calling, but the majority who are loopholed in because they're within seventy-five degrees of separation of a company you once did business with will keep on calling.

      Or political campaigners.

      Or "surveys."

      Or, more common than all of the above, credit/bank fraud schemes, who are obviously not terribly worried about the law in the first place.

      --
      "All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
    67. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If any are interested, I have been using http://www.privacycorps.com/products/?id=20, it works great. The phone spammers get one shot at calling me, then its adios! I hit a few buttons and add them to the database. They can still call, but the phone does not even ring.

      Unfortunately, it has recently been discontinued. Anyone know of a similar product?

    68. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by SargentDU · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I suppose Acorn will call and Obama will say he had nothing to do with it. :)

    69. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I can top that. I made the horrid mistake of actually donating money to a candidate once. For years afterward his party bombarded me with calls and mailings asking me for more. I've always heard of "sucker lists" for salesmen. Guess they have them for political fundraisers too. Never again.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    70. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One company (except charity) has been calling me twice a week for a year now. Yes, I've told them over and over to stop calling.

      Wow, sounds like it is long past time for them to receive one last warning that "If you call back at this number, I plan to have a whistle or air horn ready, and I will use it."

    71. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Now, now, that's hardly fair to Hitler.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    72. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by ITJC68 · · Score: 1

      Same here. Vonage is great. The only issue is when your ISP decides they want to get in on the VOIP market and when they do Vonage starts to have trouble. Happened to me ever since Comcast bought out my ISP. A friend has their phone service and it doesn't have near the features of Vonage. Verizon tried to kill them and failed. That is who my wired service is and they suck big time.

    73. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by genner · · Score: 1

      Now, now, that's hardly fair to Hitler.

      No he said worse than Hitler not equal to.

    74. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by GalacticCmdr · · Score: 1

      Actually schools represent our biggest customer base; although our B2B is the highest traffic on a daily basis. Most schools use it to announce all manner of things that are coming up (including several emergency lock downs). However, it is weather closings that really stress the system. Several geographically centered locations all hammering their full list at the same time. All of these calls will terminate into the same exchanges.

      It is strange to see the system spike, investigate it and find that a nearby school has just be locked down because of a gunman on campus grounds. The supers can sound surprisingly calm when informing the parents not to be alarmed that someone with a gun is on campus and they have everything under control.

      I understand the hatred towards robo-calling, but there are many legitimate uses as well. At the end of the day I do not feel sleazy about my code, or my company, because our system is emergency and B2B based. We do not do UCEs.

      --
      Programming: Its not just a job - its an indenture.
    75. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I have that for both my home phone and my cellphone.

      Switching to a symbian phone allows me to use an app at night that rejects all calls to voicemail that are not on a whitelist. using asterisk at home I do the same thing except for a bit further... during the day you cant ring my phone unless you are on the complete whitelist instead of the VIP list.

      works great. only rarely do I get a call in VM that I wanted and it takes secondsto add them to the Whitelist to fix it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    76. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait... people still receive paper faxes in this day and age?

      It'd cost you less to set up a cheap fax server machine. Seriously... then it's just a delete keypress that's wasted, rather than paper.

    77. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by rfunches · · Score: 1

      So you're saying:

      1. Political call-spam is annoying.
      2. Political call-spam happens to people who register to vote.
      3. Therefore, to stop getting annoying political call-spam, people should not register to vote.

      I think you left out the part about voting being much more important than a flurry of phone calls about why candidate X should not be trusted or that this is your second notice that your car warranty is about to expire, especially if you don't live in a country where you are expected to vote for a single party/person or else. Or do you seriously think that giving up the right to vote is worth the absence of a handful of phone calls in October and November?

    78. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by antic · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ...

      Robo callers that you can't hang up
      Telemarketers that fake CLI
      Exemptions from the Do not call list ... I knew there was a reason I lived in the UK

      Sure, in the UK you don't even need tape in your answering machine. Just phone up the government snoops in the near future and they'll keep a handy archive of all your calls and emails!

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    79. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Panasonic had something similar. It was pre-caller ID I think. It could have up to 4 passwords. If you didn't have a password it would ask you to leave a message or just terminate the call.

      I used a program with a modem to do the same thing. If there was no caller id, it would just hold the line and an elisa type of recording would play which would gag the market bot or telemarketer. If they had a password they'd get past all that.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    80. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Fax spam is already illegal. The only exception is if you have an existing business relationship with the recipient (e.g. my real estate agent sending a list of new listings, for example). Even within the context of that EBR exception, you are required to include opt-out instructions and are required to honor that opt-out request in a timely manner.

      If you can determine the source of the junk fax, you have the legal right to compensation up to $500 per copy. Sure, it's not jail time, but it's a start.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    81. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > VoIP is definitely the way to go.

      Yea... Asterisk has had premade bootable CDs that do this sort of thing for years. Wonder if Asterisk is now infringing on patents these guys almost certainly filed......

      > the other thing to do is regulate cold-calling (whether commercial....

      Doesn't matter. Automated dialers are already regulated, there is the no not call registry, etc. None of that matters. The telcos decided the money the spammers pay for their phone banks is too good to pass up so they sign the pink contracts and then just run interferrence. Go ahead, TRY to enforce the current laws that are supposed to let you get $500 for a junk fax. Good luck finding out who to sue because the phone company policy is not to release that information unless law enforcement supplies em with a court order. A lot of bother to collect $500 and at any rate no PD is going to help you on what is a civil matter so game over. The score? Phone Company 1, Spammer 1, customer 0.

      Do not call registry? Yea, you can file a complaint with the FTC.... against a shadow. The phone number, if one even appears on your caller ID, is almost certainly fake so just how is the FTC supposed to do anything.

      I often wonder what would happen if you documented calling the phone company right after a junk fax (that $500 being the juicy target to start on) and tell them you plan to take the previous caller to small claims court for the $500 and that if they refuse to disclose the customer's mailing address for the purpose of serving a court order then you plan to list THEM as the contact since they are now a co-conspirator. Tnen actually do it. If a few people did it odds are somebody will hit the judicial lotto. Once a few judges were identified somebody goes into business in those jurisdictions buying up junk faxes (and a limited power of attorney) from victims, suing on their behalf and forcing the telcos to reevaluate their profit/loss on spam.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    82. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      I've used Asterisk now for about 4 years. I started filtering calls from unknown (not-whitelisted) calls a couple years ago and I'll tell you - the peace and quiet we get is soooo nice.

      So mine doesn't ring the phone at all for robo's since they can't listen and act on a message that tells them to Press 1.

    83. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    84. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only criticism that I have is that it rings my phone at all (for an unrecognized number). I would prefer a system where an unknown caller (those not on the white list) has to first identify themselves as a real person (by keying some numbers) and then leave a message.

      Digitone's PrivacyCall devices do that.

    85. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus. Someone should take away your programmer's license.

    86. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Been getting these for over 6 months. Asked the dealer about it and how they got my number and make of car - they claim to have NO clue and told me point blank it wasn't them calling nor was it VW. What's odd is I am pretty sure I've never given VW my cell phone either! Very very annoying...

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    87. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that the problem lies with the phone companies?

      I agree 100%.

      They should never give vermin like you a phone line to begin with.

    88. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by ball-lightning · · Score: 1

      How long after? It's been a LONG time since I've done anything telephone-system related, but IIRC the line stays open for at least 10 seconds after you hang-up. Nowadays it could be longer/shorter?? Not sure...

    89. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Sorry you don't seem to be aware that ECHELON is a US/UK/CAN/AUS/NZ joint effort ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    90. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Soruk · · Score: 1

      If you're in the UK, Second Number is worth looking at. While some numbers are chargeable, many are free.

      Declaration of interest - it's my site.

      --
      -- Soruk
    91. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why on Earth would all you folks pay $25 per month for Vonage when you could get the same quality and service from Skype for less than $6 per month?

      Sheesh!

    92. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      The ones that call me don't know what car I have. Once when they called, I decided to play along:

      Asshole: "What year and brand is your car?"

      Me: 1992 Saturn (a blatant lie, by the way)

      Asshole: Uhh... [click]

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    93. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by theanorak · · Score: 1

      Question: is caller display not available on regular POTS phones in the US?

      I do the much the same with a regular landline here in the UK: the number flashes up on the phone's display (or the name, if they're in the address book), and if I don't know it or I'm not in the mood, I don't answer and they go to voicemail. No biggie.

      The only time I find it annoying is when I can't do it -- say I'm working from home and not using a softphone over VPN, but instead forwarding calls from my work number to my home number. Then, it's a pain, as I need to answer every call. Otherwise, not so difficult.

      --
      === Ask yourself if it's really necessary...
    94. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      I've considered that, and will be adding a Skype phone for trial shortly. When I bought Vonage, the options for Skype were limited. I'm looking for very small Skype appliance footprint. I have a few computers at home, but only one stays on always. I'd like something like this: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8592 and all the features of Vonage. It's getting to be where they are much the same. It was not so previously.

    95. Re:Hey, we could use that in the U.S. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telezapper doesnt work at all. All good robo dialers process the far end pickup (you answering the phone) via the D channel on the T1 line. There is no way for the telezapper to pass that information along the D channel and is such is worthless poop.

  2. Do Unto Others ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about the auto insurance scammers that hit me 10x/week?

    You can't reason with scammers, they use playground logic. Scam 'em back with a not so new gadget.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Do Unto Others ... by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      Hmm ... ELIZA + a speech synthesizer + some way to get free incoming calls = lots of wasted telemarketer time. It probably wouldn't take too long to get something like that set up with VoiP, either.

    2. Re:Do Unto Others ... by genner · · Score: 1

      Hmm ... ELIZA + a speech synthesizer + some way to get free incoming calls = lots of wasted telemarketer time. It probably wouldn't take too long to get something like that set up with VoiP, either.

      You would have to have Speech Recognition software attached to eliza but it could be done.

    3. Re:Do Unto Others ... by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      You can't reason with scammers, they use playground logic. Scam 'em back with a not so new gadget.

      Sure, you can war dial them...but then you'd be breaking the same laws they're breaking. And I have a feeling that you or I are more likely to go to jail than the people who are annoying us.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    4. Re:Do Unto Others ... by TechForensics · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've thought of a device that I'm hoping to build one of these days. It asks all callers for a three-digit password (which you've given to everyone you want to have it). Persons not having the three-digit code go straight to voicemail without ringing your phone, where you may listen to them... someday. Five minutes a couple of times a week reviewing these voicemails isn't too bad.

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    5. Re:Do Unto Others ... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You might want to look into Asterisk. It can do exactly that, including multiple mailboxes and more (in Asterisk's case, the password is simply the extension that rings your phone).

  3. Partially useful by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For me, this would cut out the "firefighters" and "police" charitable funds, and a couple of others that call locally. But the ones that really irk me are the "lower your credit card interest rates" that I get every few days, and it's different caller id each time. Usually falsified caller id. So I would still end up getting about the same number of nuisance calls.

    What would be optimal would be the FCC doing their job and shutting the scammers down, but I'm not holding my breath.

    1. Re:Partially useful by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Informative

      For me, this would cut out the "firefighters" and "police" charitable funds, and a couple of others that call locally. But the ones that really irk me are the "lower your credit card interest rates" that I get every few days, and it's different caller id each time. Usually falsified caller id. So I would still end up getting about the same number of nuisance calls.

      First of all, don't EVER give money to these "firefighters" and/or "police" charitable funds. Many, many scammers pose as these charitable organizations, and they only want your credit card/checking account info. Also, even if such a charity is legitimate, there's no reason to fund their administrative costs, money that doesn't go to the police or firefighters, money that pays for them to—you guessed it—make more telemarketing calls.

      If you want to support your local firefighters and/or police, call them and tell them that you'd like to make a donation. I assure you that they will be more than happy to accept your kindness, and best of all, they will make use of 100% of the money you donate, not pay people to bother yet more people by making unsolicited calls.

      Second of all, you're missing part of how this gadget works. If you're not on the whitelist or the blacklist, you'll be asked to say your name. It then rings your line and tells you what the name of the person is who is calling. Or, at least, what they recorded as their name. At that point, you can either answer, whitelist them, or blacklist them.

      I suppose your phone might still ring, which could be considered a nuisance, but you're never actually talking to the idiot who is calling you, and there's a measure of satisfaction knowing that they're getting a message that says something like, "This person is refusing to take your call. Have a nice day!"

    2. Re:Partially useful by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >I assure you that they will be more than happy to accept your kindness, and best of all, they will make use of 100% of the money you donate, not pay people to bother yet more people by making unsolicited calls.

      Is this true? When I worked in the NPO world, fundraising was an expense in the budget. All money collected while fundraising when into the budget. There wasnt a special budget for people who called directly for donations. It all goes into the pool. Perhaps it would be best to write a letter telling them you refuse to donate if they continue to use outbound call centers.

    3. Re:Partially useful by scotts13 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The overwhelming majority of the "firefighters" and "police" solicitations are outside organizations; sometimes hired by the charity, often acting without authorization at all. They'll usually send a few cents per dollar to the charity, just to maintain the illusion of being legit. The rest goes to "expenses." Why would organizations EVER authorize this? It's free money. They essentially do nothing other than authorize use of their name, and get a check. It matters not that someone else gets 10X as much.

    4. Re:Partially useful by crypticedge · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is incorrect. My stepfather used to work for a few of these in Indiana(I even tried it for a month, it sucked). The way they work is 49% of donations go to the people doing the call, the other 51% goes to the actual cause. This is better donation rate than Red Cross (between 80%-95% for the call center and the remainder to the cause depending on centers)
      Now, you are entitled by law to recieve their 401c3 federal tax ID number that registers them as a non profit in order to verify them as a non profit as they claim. If they dont give you this, tell them to piss off.

    5. Re:Partially useful by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Actually gave money to the firefighter one, they were selling concert tickets. Good deal and a decent concert.

      That ended however when the matching policemans charity started calling the next year and i think it was the same guy even. Now neither gets anything....

      Not to mention it got old the 9th time they called thanking me for my past support and do I.......

      Seriously, isn't this as old as caller ID?

    6. Re:Partially useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse than that even. You are absolutely right about scammers using 'firefighter/police' charities. But the REALLY clever ones actually legitimize their business, give a nominal/minimum percentage to some charity, and then run the business as a 'non-profit', getting various Government tax benefits, while the Directors get significant perks and pay (where the money goes). But their promo material would have you believing that their contribution is significant. The work will appear legitimate and the charity will be happy with their 10k per month, while the fact is the company is turning over >20M per year, with operating costs of about ~200k per month (all real numbers/telemarketers are paid on commission). And all of it nicely packaged and presented to be legitimate to anybody looking in from the outside - but once your on the inside the flow of money and what is really going on is just criminal.

    7. Re:Partially useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you get a call from someone who asking for money to support your local firefighters and/or police ask them for their badge number.

    8. Re:Partially useful by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Did you notice my scare quotes? I wanted to put "charitable" in scare quotes, too, but thought it would be overdoing it.

      Anyway, to the others, he's absolutely right.

    9. Re:Partially useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I would consider avoiding the "firefighers" and "police" funds as well. I had a local police group call me, ask me if I wanted info, agreed, and read the materials over when they arrived in the mail. It appeared to be a total scam once I saw the print materials.

      When the guy phoned for the follow up he put on this act like I had previously committed. They paid less than half a dollar to send me that paperwork and this was my guilt trip call? I told the guy that after reviewing the materials I wasn't interested. Enough said. Click.

  4. Nothing new here by orkybash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Phone whitelist services which make callers you're unsure about go through an extra prompt have existed at least since I was a kid. They're annoying as hell to legitimate callers.

    1. Re:Nothing new here by MadKeithV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just like locked doors are annoying as hell to legitimate visitors.

    2. Re:Nothing new here by IchNiSan · · Score: 1

      So? If someone wants to interrupt what I choose to do with my time, why shouldn't they have to jump through a hoop or two?

      If I really wanted to talk to them they would already be whitelisted. What do I care if it annoys them?

      Most folks I deal with have learned the best way to get a hold of me is to send me an email, if we need to have a conversation we can arrange it that way.

      As things stand now, I do not answer calls from unknown numbers, calls with blocked caller ID, or calls listed as "out of area", this device/service might be better for me as real people could get through if they needed me.

    3. Re:Nothing new here by Enki+X · · Score: 0

      This is more like an invisible force field in front of the door that doesn't even allow you to knock in the first place, unless you're on the whitelist.

      --
      On second thought, let's not go to the internet. 'Tis a silly place.
    4. Re:Nothing new here by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more like a force field that doesn't let you knock unless you are on the whitelist, but if you are not on the whitelist, a camera points at you, and the occupants of the house are made aware that you are outside, and they can then blacklist or whitelist you, clearly indicating whether or not your unsolicited knocking is acceptable today and in the future.

      Sounds a lot like a standard security system to me, and those are minimally annoying, about the same as locked doors.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    5. Re:Nothing new here by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Most folks I deal with have learned the best way to get a hold of me is to send me an email, if we need to have a conversation we can arrange it that way.

      And thus we are come to a full circle.
      A long, long time ago, a phone was not something everyone had or used. Phone calls were often arranged in advance, in person: you would tell someone you would call them on a specified day, at a specified time; that person would be expecting your call.
      Then technology became cheap, and now everyone had a phone. Making a call ceased to be a social occasion, and became a mere convenience. Previously, you'd never have called someone after dinner; nowadays, people don't mind very much even waking you up at 3 a.m.
      So we think up ways to make this "convenience" a bit less convenient and revert to pre-arranging our phonecalls.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    6. Re:Nothing new here by orkybash · · Score: 1

      Best analogy I've seen since the Series of Tubes.

    7. Re:Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I was working at a dial-through long distance service that was... of questionable quality. We had trouble passing through DTMF tones and proper CID depending on where you were calling. Those whitelist services led to a lot of people complaining. Nothing I could ever do about it, unfortunately.

    8. Re:Nothing new here by IchNiSan · · Score: 1

      Never thought of it that way. Definitely interesting, perhaps even insightful.

      I don't seem to have the option of using my remaining mod point and deleting my post, perhaps because you have replied. But would I would definitely like to.

      Phone calls should be a social occasion, not someone trying to sell me junk, or meaningless blather because someone is bored.

    9. Re:Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is absolutely right.

      I work for a company in the US that makes automated dialers for an industry where the recipients actually want to receive our messages, and this is not new as far as I know. I've worked with customers whose recipients had similar services through their telcos, not to mention the classic "telezappers" that played one or more Special Information Tones to sound like a disconnected number to automated dialers.

      Sounds like a slightly improved whitelist interface, but this is not new.

    10. Re:Nothing new here by defaria · · Score: 1

      Great. Then legitimate callers have a beef with the asshole callers! Let them duke it out. This is not my problem. You don't have the right to disturb me nor use my resources. If you cannot go through the minimal amount of effort to say your name such that I can identify you and "let you in" then I don't want to talk to you!

      Similarly if you knock on my door and don't answer the question that I ask (Who is it?) you won't be getting in my house either!

      How is this different simply because you called instead of knocked?

    11. Re:Nothing new here by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      I don't seem to have the option of using my remaining mod point and deleting my post, perhaps because you have replied. But would I would definitely like to.

      Alas, it is and has been for a long time that you can only post and thus undo your moderation, and not the other way round. What you post, stays posted no matter what.

      I must say it pleases me that you have found that comment worthwhile; most of the time, something random I say gets modded up, and stuff I find significant gets ignored.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
  5. An idea whose time has come by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    This would be useful not just for spammers and telemarketers, but also for those idiots who just refuse to believe me that no, Nikki doesn't live here, this is not her number and would you please stop calling here 10 times a day already.

    1. Re:An idea whose time has come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Got so fed up with that as a kid. We lived on the border between two area codes, and our number as the same as a pizza joint down the street. I would take their order and credit card number and then tell them I'm not actually a pizza place, and they called the wrong number and gave me their personal info and they authorized me to use it. Was fun.

    2. Re:An idea whose time has come by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      I used to be in the Canadian Military reserve many years ago. I got posted to CFB Penhold in Alberta and while I waited for a course to start up they put me on the military switchboard, down in the "hole" (50 ft down under 30 feet of concrete and tons of earth etc). The number for the bunker I worked in was 1 digit different than that for a local pizza joint. So at 2am I would get calls that went like this:

      Me: Hello, Alberta Regional Emergency Government Headquarters, CFB Penhold, can I help you?

      Them: Ya, can I get a large... Oh, I was calling for a pizza...

      Me: Well you have reached a nuclear bomb shelter. I suggest you check the number and call again :)

      Them: ... <click>

      Sometimes this happened more than once if they were drunk enough. Similarly I would get people calling me to ask what the weather was like, and I would have to explain I was a long ways under ground with many feet of steel and concrete over me so I had absolutely no idea.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  6. Asterisk by SpooForBrains · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm pretty sure that all the above and more is possible with an asterisk setup.

    --
    "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    1. Re:Asterisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is aimed at the home market - which I don't think can be bothered to set-up an VoIP Server.

    2. Re:Asterisk by neowolf · · Score: 1

      Yep. I've been doing this for about two years with a simple Asterisk setup.

    3. Re:Asterisk by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure that all the above and more is possible with an asterisk setup.

      With a machine shop you can build a car. Most people prefer to buy one ready made though.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    4. Re:Asterisk by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

      I chased this idea for a few days... bought an NSLU and a Sipura 3002, installed asterisk, and got the incoming call handling working beautifully. Unfortunately I could not figure out how to get asterisk configured to do outgoing calls. I'm sure outgoing calls are doable in asterisk somehow, but it wasn't obvious, and the info on how to configure asterisk in any given context (for a specific purpose with specific hardware) is scattered to the four winds on the internet. And I found asterisk's scripting language quite heinous... brittle and opaque. In the end I let the project languish. I'd pay money for someone to create a flexible device with a comprehendable scripting language that allows me to do everything I want.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    5. Re:Asterisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It most certainly IS possible as I have that sort of thing set up. It works like this:

      Call comes in. Asterisk takes the caller ID and calls a PHP script to look up the number in a MySQL database. The script returns "WHITELIST", "BLACKLIST", or "GRAYLIST" to Asterisk. For whitelisted numbers, the call goes right through, no need for the caller to do anything. Blacklisted callers get a message and a hangup. Greylisted callers get a message that their call is being screened, and we don't accept calls from telemarketers, etc. Then they are instructed to enter one number to ring through or another to go to voicemail. We've had ZERO telemarketer calls since I put this in place. I've included features like press *1 after a call to add the last caller to the whitelist, *2 to add the last caller to the blacklist, and after-hours call intercepting which affects all calls that would ring through.

    6. Re:Asterisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. I've been doing this for about two years with a simple Asterisk setup.

      Ohh, a new phrase!

    7. Re:Asterisk by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      you can buy ready made asterisk systems.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Asterisk by Freaek · · Score: 1

      might I suggest PBX in a flash?

      http://pbxinaflash.com/

      It seems to take care of most of the annoying config issues with asterisk.

      For me at least!

  7. you can do this with Asterisk too by Dan667 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a crazy girlfriend option for Asterisk that you can have a blacklist and the phone never rings either. Actually, you can have rules as complicated as you like.

    1. Re:you can do this with Asterisk too by Farhood · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...and GrandCentral. Lord knows I record or "listinIn" _every_ incoming call from an unknown number and then send the telemarketers "to spam" where I never have to worry about them again.

      GrandCentral also has its own spam filter of (supposed) telemarketers, and the application allows friends and family to get right through.

    2. Re:you can do this with Asterisk too by Ron_Fitzgerald · · Score: 1

      "We're happy to announce that Google has aquired GrandCentral"

      Oh well.

      --
      ~ Ron Fitzgerald
    3. Re:you can do this with Asterisk too by Farhood · · Score: 1

      they acquired grandcentral over a year ago. i've been using grandcentral only since google's pwned it.

  8. End vs. flash by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What really infuriates me about them is that I can't seem to hang up on them (if you try to hang up and pick up the phone later, the message is still playing).

    How long did you leave the phone on-hook? You might have to hold it a few more seconds so that the exchange can determine that you're trying to end the call and not perform a flash.

    1. Re:End vs. flash by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doesn't matter, it WILL NOT let you hang up on them, no matter how many seconds you leave the phone on the hook. I noticed this when a friend mentioned that he had tried to hang up on one and couldn't. The next time I got one, I tried the same thing and sure enough, it wouldn't let me hang up on it until it had played all the way through. This isn't the case with normal telemarketer calls, only the "robo-calls" (which used to be just political hit-jobs, but now have expanded out to sales calls too).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:End vs. flash by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      Some older phone switches wouldn't disconnect until both phones were hung up. The robo caller of course can't tell that your phone is hung up.

    3. Re:End vs. flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      *sigh* The phone company is NOT in cahoots with those using the robo-callers, but I can understand how it might appear to be so. If simply hanging up does not work, you can try unplugging your telephone or you can even go to the NID and unplug your entire house from there. One of those two things should work (and you can either leave your receiver off-hook or not while attempting these things). If you're using a telephone with a curly cord, you can also try just unplugging the handset from the base, too.

    4. Re:End vs. flash by greed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Contact your telephone company and ask for "disconnect on hang-up" on your line. If they don't know what that is, ask for "the thing you need when you get a dial-on-demand burglar alarm."

      Phone systems in North America traditionally require both parties to hang up to terminate the circuit. With disconnect on hang-up, you can kill the circuit from your end by hanging up for at most 10 seconds.

      This is increasingly the default. But it should be available everywhere these days; I think the last mechanical switch is finally gone.

    5. Re:End vs. flash by Plunky · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter, it WILL NOT let you hang up on them, no matter how many seconds you leave the phone on the hook.

      I've not had a land line for many years but here in the UK it has always (so far as I know) been that the callee can hang up and the call will not be disconnected for at least 30 seconds. You can use that feature to transfer to a different extension - just hang up, walk downstairs, and pick up the other handset.

      If the caller hangs up though, the call will be disconnected right away.

    6. Re:End vs. flash by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      I think it has to do with the actual phone being used. I've noticed that when my parents hang up sometimes my mobile reports the call has ended and sometimes it doesn't, and I think it depends on whether they're using the cordless that only covers the front of the house or the older corded phone in the living room. I'll need to do some experiments I think.

  9. RAH's SASL gadget is still better by Monty+Worm · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I remember reading about a gadget in Robert Heinlein's Stranger in a Strange Land that did a better job than this.

    If you want to talk to me, deposit $midrange_sum_of_money . I will stop what I'm doing and respond to you. If I think the interruption was justified, you'll get your money back. Otherwise, it's a donation to the Charity of Me. Obviously you can let some people bypass this, at least at some times of the day.

    Implicit in this is the belief that if you don't trust me with your cash, or you feel that you don't want to risk the money on my whims, leave a message. And there should be a much smaller charge here too, just to stop the telemarketers clogging that also.

    $sum needs to be fairly large, but not cripplingly so. A day's pay? Hmmm. Maybe I should just get an 0906 number for my house....

    --
    ... and today's pet project has ... been discarded for lack of time.
    1. Re:RAH's SASL gadget is still better by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I've always thought that would be a good system, too.

      There are a lot of systems, for both email, phone, and paper-mail spam, that would work well but require some form of reliable and fast payment infrastructure to implement. That's the real sticking point.

      If you had the ability to quickly and easily wire arbitrarily large or small amounts of money to someone (on a 'push' rather than 'pull' basis) without a lot of overhead, either in time or service charges, it would be practical to use micropayments or refundable charges on many kinds of messaging. I'd be all over it for email as well -- want to send me something? No problem, that'll be $1, but you'll get it back after I've read the message and confirmed that it's not spam.

      In the absence of such a payment system, you might be able to approximate the same effect with CAPTCHAs, although it's not nearly as good. (Really, a CAPTCHA just requires the sender to spend time before they can communicate with you, and there's no way to easily refund their time back to them, once you've determined that they're not a spammer.)

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:RAH's SASL gadget is still better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was actually 'Cat Who Walks Through Walls', and it was Hazel's, IIRC.

  10. National Do Not Call Registry by bunratty · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I simply signed up on the National Do Not Call Registry (US only). That cut the telemarketing calls from several per day to once a month or two. For those that I still receive, I ask them not to call again. Then I file a complaint on the Do Not Call website because they shouldn't have called in the first place.

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    1. Re:National Do Not Call Registry by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work cross border. All that is happening now, is Canadian telemarketers call US numbers and US telemarketers call Canada...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    2. Re:National Do Not Call Registry by bunratty · · Score: 1

      That sucks. At least I haven't seen that yet. The biggest offenders I've seen so far have been in-state calls. I got a telemarketing call from an area code in Florida last week. And I've lived within 50 miles of Canada for years.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    3. Re:National Do Not Call Registry by sherriw · · Score: 1

      Canada just got it's own do not call list- it started on Sept 30 / 2008.

      https://www.lnnte-dncl.gc.ca/index-eng

    4. Re:National Do Not Call Registry by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

      There should be some type of agreement between the countries now that Canada also has a Do Not Call list. Being Canadian, I can attest that the 2-3 daily calls that I get saying "This is your captain speaking, you've won 2 cruise tickets" come from the US. That is pretty much the only telemarketing calls I get outside of companies that I do business with (phone company, bank, etc...).

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away
  11. How it works by PearsSoap · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So, basically, it has a local blacklist and whitelist. Except that

    In future, there are plans for the device to be able to download a list of blacklisted numbers from a central database, which can be dialled into via a modem inside the box.

    And this will be updated by the users. It might just work.
    I'm more impressed by the whole "virtual receptionist" aspect. That could be handy.

    1. Re:How it works by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      Idunno man. User-updated spam lists kinda piss me off. I pretty regularly notice that email newsletters I have explicitly signed up for, end up being marked as "spam" because other users on gmail or yahoo have marked the email as spam on their end. So, my stuff that I not only consented to but specifically signed up for by filling out a form often gets marked as spam. Look, people - if you don't want to continue getting a newsletter you signed up for, freaking spend a few seconds to click the "click here to unsubscribe" button!!!!!

    2. Re:How it works by PearsSoap · · Score: 1

      You've got a point. I suppose it depends on what kind of threshold you set. If they allowed you to accept all but the most-reported calls, perhaps you could find a setting to your liking. It might also be easier to implement this for a few phone calls from unique numbers a day, rather than for hundreds of emails.

  12. Sweet! I wish there was an American one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    On November 1st, I will be turning off ALL the ringers on my phones. Why? Because the politicians will be bombarding me with calls about how the other guy is Satan incarnate. Some times is backfires. Like the democratic ad against Chamblis here in Georgia. I didn't know that he supported the Fair Tax. Now, I'll vote for him.

    1. Re:Sweet! I wish there was an American one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satan incarnate? Pffft. That's why I vote Cthulhu

  13. Not Asterisk! by babycakes · · Score: 1

    I'm sure Asterisk is suitable for this. If you have the time, inclination and oh probably a bit of geek inside you to actually want to try and set this up. But seriously, how many grannies are going to want to set up an Asterisk server that lives in the corner of their living room next to the pot plant and the electric fire, and worry about what it's doing etc? It makes far more sense if you're going to market this to the general public to make it as easy as pressing a button to block future calls from that number, rather than having to fiddle about with a web interface yourself, or call grandson Johnny and get him to come over and fix it.

  14. Unlisted Numbers by dmomo · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's the problem I would have. Probably more than half of the calls I get that are unlisted are calls that I want. The other half are telemarketers. Even though I am on the "Do Not Call" registry, they get around it by either:

    a) Pretending to get the wrong number, hanging up quickly when I call them on it.
    b) Have some loose (and yes, sometimes legitimate) connection to a "Not for profit and Tax Exempt" business which, at least in Massachusetts is enough for the registry to not apply
    c) Is a survey related to some business connection I have. Credit Card companies who sold my info etc.

    None of these three are calls that I would pick up, but I just don't see this device weeding them out. I suppose if this device could "answer" then ask for a name, and instead of ringing, play the recorded name... otherwise hang up. That would be good.

    1. Re:Unlisted Numbers by Still+an+AC · · Score: 1, Interesting

      if this device could "answer" then ask for a name, and instead of ringing, play the recorded name...

      I know this slashdot and you didn't RTFA, but that is EXACTLY what this does...

    2. Re:Unlisted Numbers by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that you have so many legit unlisted calls. It used to be that caller ID support was rather spotty and wouldn't always show up for certain callers like out of state and rural areas, but nowadays I've found if the call doesn't have caller ID that means the caller is intentionally blocking it which means it's someone I don't want to talk to. I've had zero legit calls/calls that left a message without caller ID in the past 3 years or so.

  15. End user instead of service provider -- I like it. by glindsey · · Score: 1

    This is basically what the "Privacy Manager" feature does on American networks like AT&T, albeit a bit more restrictive. It would answer any calls with no Caller ID automatically, and allow people to record their name; then the Privacy Manager would call you and ask if you want to take the call (similar to the way a collect call works). It would let through all calls with valid Caller ID, though, instead of using a whitelist. We used to have it on our old landline service; unfortunately, our current VoIP provider doesn't offer it.

    I'd get one of these in a heartbeat. We already screen our calls based on the Caller ID info displayed anyway, so it would be a nice added step. (I'd love to set up an Asterisk box, but definitely don't have the time...)

  16. Want to trade phone numbers? by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live in an area with a high Hispanic population, and coincidentally have a Spanish last name. I've been on the DNC list for years, but I get all kinds of telemarketers trying to scam me in Spanish. (It's pretty obvious that these are not legitimate nonprofits or companies. They hang up on me once they find out I speak English.) Blocked CID, of course, so it's hard to report them.

    They're counting on the fact that most of their Spanish-speaking targets are either unaware of the DNC and other laws, or more likely are illegal and thus afraid to report them to the Feds.

    And that's ignoring the peole who are "Conductiing a survey about your telephone service" or "Conducting a survey about how you recieve television"

    1. Re:Want to trade phone numbers? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Technically, those surveys are not advertising. They're attempts to find out how well their advertising is working. If you're like me and TiVo-skip every ad religiously (when I'm not MythTV-auto-skipping, that is), you can really drive their ad success statistics down. It's kind of fun, actually, once you realize how much money you're costing the ad companies every time you take one of those surveys. :-)

      If it happens to be something you care about (like they did a survey on internet providers once), you also get the opportunity for your rants to bubble up if enough people complain about something. Also kind of fun in an "I know you don't want to hear this, but your service sucks, and I'm thinking about replacing you with a piece of twine and two tin cans" sort of way....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  17. What if a Robo-call.... by sam0737 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...call into this auto-answer system?

    Will two robot start chatting together? We should definitely put some recording to watch them or else the first two machines that pass turning test might gone unnoticed.

  18. round here we call that fangled gadget a secretary by Capn_Snazzy · · Score: 4, Funny

    but I would love to set up a touch tone menu for just the telemarketers. --press 1 if you are an annoying caller --press 2 if you are probably just trying to waste my time --press 3 if your intention is to sell me something --press 4 if you just want me to answer your questions for free --but not actually buy anything --press 5 for another menu --press 6 to hear these options again --press 7 seven three three... two three three... five five..one to connect to a live operator (really it would just be another menu but this time with 130 different options spoken in a heavy Scottish slang)

  19. Voicemail by Leif_Bloomquist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every couple of days I get a "spam" message from a telemarketer, left directly on my voicemail. The phone never actually rings. That's about as frequent as real telemarketer calls. Doesn't sound like this system would stop those, unfortunately.

  20. Telemarketers? by cl0s · · Score: 1

    Forget blocking telemarketers, this is great for blocking collection agencies and pesky credit card companies. :)

    Hmm, sounds like a great Android App, with a community maintainable blacklist where you can list numbers under different groups, etc.

  21. done that... by ksheer · · Score: 1

    we've already developed this as a premium soft-service & have deployed it at several telcos already. it provides 2 lists: allow & deny & 3 modes allow all, allowed list only & block all. and the telcos provide this service @ as low as INR30.00 per month ( $1)!!! there are several s/w available on symbian which can do this already... i think that the overhead is just as much... adding numbers to the list. apart from that, here in India there is a national DND list, as instructed by the Supreme Court & TRAI... you can get ur number listed on it (toll free ofcourse :P) - no unsolicited calls! and if you do, you know who is in trouble...

  22. The Only Thing I Have to Say - Where Can I Buy One by gadlaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nothing gets my blood pressure rising more than phone calls coming in that are not welcomed. I pay for the phone and it's not for advertisers, political pleadings, scammers and assorted idiots who think I owe them the time of day. I just looked at Amazon and it's not there, make this available to the US and you have a best seller.

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  23. The DMA will be screaming about this one by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    How dare we answer their robot dialers with a robot answerer!

    The telespammers "time" is very valuable :)

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:The DMA will be screaming about this one by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      That's a good one...
      I have an Asterisk setup that rejects calls from blacklisted numbers, i should configure it to play ads until the caller hangs up.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  24. Wait where have I seen this before? by noundi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't it hilarious? The industry has created such an itch that people actually PAY to get rid of them. The mafia of this century, and this time it's legal!

    --
    I am the lawn!
  25. Just Screen by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

    For the land line, no tech needed other than an answering machine. You call, you leave a message, and if I know (and want to talk to) you I pick up. If you don't say anything, then you're either a spammer or it probably wasn't very important to begin with.

    Bonus: No Caller ID here, so I'm not even responsible for knowing you called (and thus for returning it) if you don't leave a message.

  26. Asterisk by neowolf · · Score: 1

    This is really easy to do with Asterisk, however- implementing an Asterisk setup at home is a bit challenging. It's nice to see something like this made into an appliance. This is especially true since you don't have to pay extra for a carrier's "privacy" features to get it.

  27. Revenge by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    About fifteen or so years ago I had a modem that came with Cheyenne Bitware voicemail software. It was pretty cool, I set something up similar to this gizmo in TFA.

    I had it set up so the voicemail messages and callers went thhrough the PC speakers, so if someone I actually wanted to talk to came on I'd just answer. (caller ID showed the number).

    "Hello" (pause so it sounded like a person answered and they would start talking) "Hi, you have reached the mcgrew residence. Press one if you wish to leave a message, two if you are a telemarketer, three if you are with a charity, four of you wish to conduct a survey, five if you represent a political candidate who wants my vote...

    I had every chioce leading down a labrynthian rabbit-hole that went in circles. Friends and family knew to hit any key twice or just leave a message.

    Much hilarity ensued.

    My 77 year old dad, when he gets a telemarketer, just lays the phone down and lets them talk, checking periodically to see if they're still on the line. They want to waste your time? Tit for tat. Telemarketers are WORSE than spammers IMO.

    1. Re:Revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      when he gets a telemarketer, just lays the phone down and lets them talk, checking periodically to see if they're still on the line

      That's the way to do it. I've had them talk for 15 minutes straight before realizing it. If you really want to get the point across about wasting time, a little "taste of your own medicine" goes a long way.

    2. Re:Revenge by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Funny

      My 77 year old dad, when he gets a telemarketer, just lays the phone down

      This is very useful. I typically will do it like this .....

      ME: Can you hold on a sec, I'm right in the middle of __________.

      THEM: Sure.

      Me: COOL! (set phone down) .... five minutes later ...

      ME: You still there? Sorry, but this is taking a bit longer than I thought, could you hold a bit longer ????

      (wash rinse repeat) I have a record of almost 40 minutes for one poor idiot, before he caught a clue.

      Other Hillarious ways to deal with it... pretend to be having sex while chatting with them ..."honey, you know when I love when you __________ like that". It really helps if your SO is also in on it in the background.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Revenge by Dr.+Zim · · Score: 1

      My 77 year old dad, when he gets a telemarketer, just lays the phone down and lets them talk, checking periodically to see if they're still on the line. They want to waste your time? Tit for tat. Telemarketers are WORSE than spammers IMO.

      Yep! This is the about the only one I think that has any positive effect. Not only have you wasted their time, but you're helping to spare some other poor sap that would be getting the call if you hung up right away.

      My other favorite is getting their 800 numbers and having my fax modem call them all night.

      Ooops. Sorry... was my mistake costing you money?

      Seriously, these days, the ONLY calls I pick up are from my ex wife or daughter. EVERYTHING else can go to voice mail, which Vonage is kind enough to email me to listen to at my convenience. Same thing with the cell phone.

      --
      (name withheld by request)
    4. Re:Revenge by Convector · · Score: 1

      One time my father-in-law kept them on the phone for quite some time. When they asked "How are you doing tonight?", a question to which most people expect a one-word answer, he went and narrated everything that happened that day without pausing to give the other party a chance to speak. Must have been half an hour. And as I understand it, it's actually illegal for the caller to hang up on the callee. That's more effort than the alternative options that other posters have provided, but it was very entertaining.

  28. See Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the Advanced Call Manager program I have had on my last two smartphones.

    I have it setup with two profiles, "Normal" and "Do not Disturb".

    For "Normal", anyone not on the black list and not blocking caller ID can call me.

    For "Do Not Disturb", only people on the white list can call me.

    Then setup the scheduler to flip between modes automatically, and you're all set... (use "Do Not Disturb" 7-8am, 12-1pm, and 5-6pm).

    When a call is denied, it goes directly to voice mail without ringing the phone.

  29. Can be done with Asterisk by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    I already do this using Asterisk...

    Callers who withhold their number hear a message asking them to unblock their caller id,
    Callers with blacklisted numbers get a message telling them their number is blacklisted,
    Callers in my whitelist ring my phone at any time of the day or night,
    Any other callers ring only during the day, and go direct to voicemail at night.

    What i want tho, is something like this for my mobile... I get a lot more junk calls on my mobile, on the landline i'm usually not in and therefore don't notice until i get home and see the missed calls. Surely it must be possible for someone to write an iphone app that behaves in the same way as my asterisk setup - ie telling users to unblock their callerid or their call won't be answered...

    Users who explicitly block their callerid are a real pet hate of mine, why would anyone do that unless they have something to hide? If it's a company, just present your main switchboard/advertised number so i can recognise the call.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    1. Re:Can be done with Asterisk by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1
      For your mobile:
      1. Give out only your home number to people who you don't need pictures, text messages, whatever from.
      2. Forward the home number to your mobile while away, and let the home asterisk box do the fun stuff
      3. Profit!

      Bonus, if so inclined and have a gps-enabled phone: Write an app for the mobile that automatically sets up the forward as you leave/arrive at the house. I should patent this...

    2. Re:Can be done with Asterisk by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Trouble is, then i would pay for the backhaul from my home phone to my mobile... Since Asterisk would have to terminate the existing call, and then initiate another outbound call to my mobile once the caller was authenticated.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:Can be done with Asterisk by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, you don't need GPS...
      You can use bluetooth or wifi to detect when your phone is at home.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  30. Phone encryption and other gadgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I don't understand is why there aren't more whitelist/blacklist/encryption gadgets for phones nowadays. Don't want the NSA hearing everything you say? Buy an encryption device and have all your friends buy one too, generate some 2048 bit keys and start communicating with confidence. Don't want anyone to call you that you don't know? Get a whitelist device, etc.

  31. I can't imagine by DogDude · · Score: 1

    I'm one of a LOT of people that I know that hasn't had a land line at home for many years. I can't imagine why somebody would want one. Having a phone ringing at my house all the time with telemarketers would be terrible. Why do people still have land lines at home (assuming cell service is available where you live)?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:I can't imagine by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cell service is still poor when compared to landlines, for one thing (I'm speaking of quality here, though availability is true during high-volume call times), and a cell phone for everyone in the family is generally more than land service. It's also expensive in many areas to get dry-loop DSL or cable internet service (for me, it's $17-40 more for internet without a land-phone, depending on speed and provider).

      Also, with the DNC list, we get maybe 1 call per month which is a telemarketer. My wife got more wrong-number dials on her new cell number in the first 6 months.

      Land lines are convenient for several reasons, though some admittedly fall into the old-codger realm. The biggest is a phone that never moves. For those who have ever a) misplaced a cell phone or b) had an emergency in the house (i.e. 911*), there is a good use for them.

      *yes, in theory they can get your location from your cell. In most of the US (by area, not population), though, the only information a 911 center is going to get inside of 10 minutes is your address which is linked in their internal database to your phone number. Even e911 isn't universal - or close to it. If you have a stroke or a heart attack, it may make the difference between recovering and being dead. Remember - Not everyone is 20-something and single.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:I can't imagine by techess · · Score: 1

      Also cell coverage is not universal. I live in cell black hole. So far none of the my friend's cells work within 15 minutes. The "phone" that gets the closest and still works is a vehicle with Onstar, but even that cuts out before they even turn onto my road.

      Since I'm not willing to invest in WiMax equipment yet dial-up is my only internet option at home. Even if cell service worked it wouldn't be convenient/affordable to dial in this way.

      --
      Don't anthropomorphize computers. They *hate* that.
  32. Hanging up when you answer to the wrong name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "May I speak to Bob?"

    "He is busy. Can you leave a message and he'll call you back?"

    "There is no message." Click.

    Theses are the telemarketing calls that tee me off. They just waste everyone's time and they are obviously not trying to sell anything since they refuse to give a message.

    And even if Bob is there:
    "May I please speak to Bob?"

    "May I tell him who is calling?"

    "It's Joe."

    "He says he doesn't know a Joe."

    Click.

    They refuse to give the name of an organization. The only way to deal with this is:

    "May I speak to Bob?"

    "This is Bob."

    "I am with XYZ company--"

    "Please don't call here again." Click.

    Only if Bob answers the phone do they tell you what they are calling about. I find that annoying.

    It was even worse when I was unemployed and waiting by the phone for a call back from a perspective employer.

  33. Astycrapper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There is a script for Asterisk:

    http://www.linuxsystems.com.au/astycrapper/

    You can route blacklisted numbers to it but more often than not the telemarketer has no callerID. This is way more fun.

  34. MCleaner and iPhone by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

    A little "firewall" app for iPhone called MCleaner has the exact same functionality and only costs $20.

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  35. May I respond, +1 cynical? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    You know that some lobbyist will pay some legislator (who has their own spam callers, every re-election season) to make this illegal.

    We need to then find that legislator, and shoot him/her.
    We need to then find that lobbyist, and impale them as an example to others.

    Then all will be just a little more 'right' with the world.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:May I respond, +1 cynical? by Convector · · Score: 1

      Don't you think you're being a bit soft on this issue?

  36. Telemarketing (junk) call blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently put the source code for a (simple) system similar to this on www.SourceForge.net. In the Search: window, enter 'jcblock'.

  37. This is a good idea, asterisk is not for joe avg by d-r0ck · · Score: 1

    This is a good product for an average person. An average person is NOT going to be using asterisk in their home. It likely has the option to block anonymous calls, and if not it should in a future version. It's basically just a whitelist of who can call. It should also have an option to whitelist numbers in advance. Numbers not yet listed should be able to be screened at a later date rather than making the screening immediate. Maybe not a perfect product but a step in the right direction.

  38. My dad taught me a game: "winding up the caller" by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I see every unsolicited call as an opportunity. If I am in a hurry there are a number of quick responses.

    The "National Security drop number" is a good one. You sound agitated and ask them what their security clearance is. When they don't understand you say "this is a top secret number - hos did you get this?". Whatever they say you then become really calm and say "O..K.. don't worry. Just stay on the line and we will soon have this resolved". Move the phone away from your mouth and ask "how is the trace going.... good". They usually hang up really soon.

    Another good one is to ask them for their number so you can call them back. Say you never trust anyone unless you made the call. Some actually will give you a number, which you pretend to write down but ignore

    Another is the "sexual interest". This takes a little longer, because you have to start by listening as normal. After a bit you say something like "you know, you sound really hot. Do you live anywhere near (somewhere a long way away)?". If they don't hang up then you can start asking what they are wearing, etc. This works really well for other men, they usually can't wait to get off the line. (I wouldn't go to far, I don't think anyone would try to prosecute you for harassing them when they made the call, but stay legal)

    Then there's the "in the same line of business". This can actually be used for a quick call, but its best to wait until they finish. Note down a few points then respond with something better. "Actually I work for associated life insurance, and whereas you can guarantee 4% growth I can offer you a policy that will guarantee 4.2%, plus with a discount on the first six months premiums.

    Another one is to listen all the way through and then decline for a really illogical reason. They are well rehearsed at the "can't afford it", "already have an alternative" and so on - but "well I would really love too. But you are called Acme associates. I'm afraid that is just incompatible with my star sign. Especially when you call on a Wednesday"

    There are plenty more but you get the picture. They are giving you an opportunity for fun.

  39. Why doesn't Vonage do this? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    The one thing that may motivate my lazy ass to build a home VOIP system would be to have a CID blacklist feature.

    And even better, a distributed MAPS-style CID blacklist, pointing to say whocalled.us or some similar service.

  40. As I recall, this was predicted in "2081" by Chris.Nelson · · Score: 1

    Two Thousand Eighty-One : A Hopeful View of the Human Future by Gerard K. O'Neil predicted TiVo/DVR and several other things including this, if I recall correctly. Sounds good, though.

  41. Telemarketing (junk) call blocker by SaberCat · · Score: 1

    I recently posted the source code for a (simple) system similar to this on www.SourceForge.net. In the Search: window, enter: jcblock

  42. Google Grand Central does all this and more... by jerryasher · · Score: 2, Informative

    Google's grandcentral offers this (they call it call screening), and they offer more too. Currently in Beta. Currently free.

    http://www.grandcentral.com/home/features

    Screen Callers
    Know who's calling and screen unknown callers

    ListenInTM
    Hear why someone is calling before taking the call

    Call Record
    Record calls on the fly and access recordings online

    Block Callers
    Unwanted callers won't be able to reach you anymore

    Notifications
    Receive voicemail notifications via email or SMS

    Ring Different Phones
    One number that rings different phones based on who's calling

    Greetings
    Personalize your voicemail greetings by caller or group

    RingShareTM
    Go beyond the ring and choose ringback tones for your callers

    WebCall Button
    Let people call you from a web page without showing your number

    CallSwitch
    Switch phones in the middle of a call

    Click2Call
    Call from your addressbook and save your typing

    Mobile Access
    Visual voicemail for your mobile phone

  43. Sucks to have a phone in the USA by mollymoo · · Score: 1

    Judging by the responses here nuisance calls are about two orders of magnitude more of a problem in the US than in the UK. Here, if as an individual you opt out of marketing calls you don't get any - that includes charities and political parties. They clamp down hard and fast on people who break the law (it is illegal, not just a breach of your terms and conditions). Many businesses have consent for marketing in their standard contracts, but I've only had a few such calls in my life and if you tell them to stop they have to, by law.

    It's worse for businesses, AFAIK they can't opt out of marketing calls. When I worked in a telephone exchange we'd get three or four marketing calls per week. The most amusing ones were when they tried to sell you phone service or broadband. "This is a British Telecom exchange mate, we've got 20 000 lines already" shut them up pretty fast.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    1. Re:Sucks to have a phone in the USA by igb · · Score: 1

      Judging by the responses here nuisance calls are about two orders of magnitude more of a problem in the US than in the UK. Here, if as an individual you opt out of marketing calls you don't get any - that includes charities and political parties. They clamp down hard and fast on people who break the law (it is illegal, not just a breach of your terms and conditions). Many businesses have consent for marketing in their standard contracts, but I've only had a few such calls in my life and if you tell them to stop they have to, by law.

      By and large, outbound marketing checks against the TPS but doesn't then check if there's an explicit permission been given by the target. So if you register with the TPS but also give explicit permission to company X, company X usually won't call you. For smaller companies there are services available which implement the TPS at a network level: a company uses carrier-preselect which in turn fails any call to an opted out subscriber. See http://www.optoutuk.com/telephonepreferenceservice.asp?screen_id=tps. Larger companies pull the TPS register into their systems, under fairly tight controls.

    2. Re:Sucks to have a phone in the USA by ehintz · · Score: 1

      Seems to be a landline thing. My VOIP line is in the states and has been remarkably spam free for the last 5 years or so.

      --
      ehintz
  44. Old old old news by argent · · Score: 1

    This kind of product has been out for years. Oh, this one probably has some option that all the others don't, but it's about as much "news" as "Dell's next laptop will come in olive green".

  45. Or just wear down their spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What you are describing may be fun the first few times, but I eventually just want the calls to stop. This is difficult considering I am already on the do not call list and the scammers who still call never give out any identifying information (caller ID is forged).

    I have taken to simply swearing at them, telling them that what they are doing is illegal, and that they are parasitic scum. The purpose is two-fold. First, it ties up their (semi-)valuable time because I always select the option to talk with a human. Second, and more importantly, I am hoping that it wears down their spirit and makes them loathe what they are doing, if only just a little. Everybody, please do this. It will be so much more effective if this is the default response to their calls. I am referring to the auto insurance, debt consolidation, etc. scammers who ignore the do not call list and hide their identity.

  46. Re:My dad taught me a game: "winding up the caller by CDS · · Score: 1

    While that approach definitely has merit, it takes too much time and can be too subtle.

    I prefer the direct approach: an airhorn blown right into the microphone.

  47. Free alternative by DavidIQ · · Score: 1

    I have a server at home so this is a good option for me as well as for anyone else that has one. It took a few tries to find the right modem for the job that would recognize caller IDs and also respond to the phone call but in the end it was well worth it.

    The software is called PhoneTray Free and the modem I use is an Agere Systems PCI-SV92PP (that may or may not be the right model...bought the modem online but it's definitely an Agere as recommended by the software developer). Hooked up the phone line to it and it screens all calls. I can set it to respond with things like "This number has been disconnected" or "We do not accept telemarketing calls" and other typical phone company messages. Before I put this in we were getting phone calls all the time from collection agencies looking for other people and wouldn't stop calling even after telling them the person did not live there. Now they just get a "This number has been disconnected" and the frequency of the calls has actually dropped!

    Worth a look if you don't want to pay for such a service.

    1. Re:Free alternative by DavidIQ · · Score: 1

      Forgot to mention that yes there is no pre-set phone list to block but you can set it to only answer calls on the list or start adding numbers easily to the blocked list as they come in. A simple right-click and block option is all it takes :)

    2. Re:Free alternative by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      and if so inclined, a powerful, albeit far more involved to set up, linux option is to use vgetty:

      http://alpha.greenie.net/vgetty/

      One of these days, in my copious spare time...

  48. get GrandCentral instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this offers nothing over GrandCentral (now a google company) - it is hardly more interesting than call filters already available for any nokia phone (most of which are free).

    i call this fluffnews.

  49. This Should Be Built Into The Phone by esme · · Score: 1

    Modern phones have programmable phonebooks built in. It would be very easy to have something like this added to the phone options: if the number isn't in my phonebook, don't ring.

  50. Is that Mr Jazz ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... firstname, Hugh?

  51. Re:My dad taught me a game: "winding up the caller by herring0 · · Score: 1

    I think I might have even seen this suggestion somewhere on /. but my new favorite is:

    Listen for just a second then (as if you just determined it isn't anything important) interrupt them and ask them if they can call back later or if they would mind holding on for a minute while you finish masturbating.

    I can say the only responses I've gotten from that one is either *click* or uuuuuhhhhhhh......*click* hehe

  52. a gizmo? smartphones have that OotB by var-tec · · Score: 1

    Using smartphone you can define hooks, for example only put trough call from numbers, which are on your contact list or for example block all "hidden" numbers. You can also create blacklist.
    So whats the point of having "a gizmo"? For landline? Someone who really wants to speak with me will ring me on the mobile anyway.

  53. Will buy when service comes to cell by UncleMantis · · Score: 0

    As soon as my cell provider starts offering this service then I am be glad to pay a per month fee! It used to be that one was safe with a cell phone since it is not listed but now adays with cold calling and people using the numbers as their primary that is a thing of the past!

    --
    Uncle Mantis
  54. Been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already do this with asterisk. However I've setup my system to make them suffer several menus before I tell them to foad.

  55. This is NOT new by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

    This is NOT new. Anyone using Asterix has likey programmed their system to do just that. You can have it do whatever you like.

    ONe trhing is that telemarketers and certainly scammers will block their caller ID. So you don't gt any number. These calls would go to an automated system that asked them questions and has them press numbers. The questions never (literally near) end... If you are a telemarketer press 3, if you are selling household goods press1, services ppress 3,,,,,, please enter you suoe size and then the pounf key,,, Please enter your social security number and the press pond,.... and then it starts over.

    Most of then get the idea after the first question and hang up.

    A free home oriented system is here
    http://www.trixbox.org/

    The full up free asterix system is here
    http://www.asterisk.org/

  56. Re:My dad taught me a game: "winding up the caller by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

    My brother has aonther good trick. Anyone offring to sell any home product his says "yes" please come out to my place and we can talk. This works for realestate people and roffers and painters and so on. Then he gives them the address of the house across the street. This is good because if seriously wastes their time and costs them money.

  57. Repetitive Scamers by fm6 · · Score: 1

    What about the auto insurance scammers that hit me 10x/week?

    You'd think they'd get a clue after you'd told them to FO 100 times. I found devices like this to be very effective.

  58. Not new... by erc · · Score: 1

    Uh, this isn't new - a friend of mine in Des Moines has had one of these for at least three years. Maybe new to the Brits?

    --
    -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
  59. Answering machine by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    There's a pretty easy way to get this done already. You just let the answering machine get every call after 0.001 rings, and only listen to it once per day to figure out who to call back. What situation would it be where someone would need you to call back immediately and they couldn't physically knock on your door, if it was all that urgent?

    --
    stuff |
  60. I think they're missing a trick here..... by quarkoid · · Score: 1

    First, let me say that I'm an Asterisk consultant with experience of the SOHO and SME marketplaces (plus a few Enterprise level call centres). I have a lot of experience of what people want from their phones. I'd also add that my home number has had this feature on it for the past three years!!

    I would be very surprised if they shifted a lot of these boxes in the UK. Nuisance calls aren't as much of a problem as they are in the US and I simply can't see that many people thinking it worth while spending GBP100 on a box to filter them out.

    However, the box has an inbuilt answerphone and for an additional GBP25, it'll do call recording too.

    Now, that's where the value is forget everything else, a call recorder for GBP125 is pretty good value. Add to that the fact that you've got an answerphone _and_ you can screen calls and that's amazing value.

    So, IMHO, their marketing's all wrong. In the UK, the value is definitely in call recording.

    However, your views may vary!

  61. Record this 3-pitch cadence to fool the autodialer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To get telemarketers to quit calling your number by making their computer dialing equipment think it has reached a disconnected telephone number, record the special 3-pitch cadence SIT (special information tone) sequence with your answering machine just before the beginning of your message. The tone is at telephonetribute.com/signal_and_circuit_conditions.htm

  62. Nothing new - Offered by ATT years ago by Forthan+Red · · Score: 1

    This is nothing new. ATT offered it (and may still) as a subscription service years ago. It was call Call Management. If a blocked caller-ID number tried to ring through, the caller was asked to leave their name, which was recorded. It then rang the target number, played the name, and gave you a number of options, such as to let the call through, hang up, or play a recording that tells the caller to place the number on their do-not-call list. You could also set up codes for people who are behind phone systems that automatically block caller ID, so they could get through to you.

  63. Re:you can do this with GrandCentral too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can do this and more with GrandCentral.

    I typically let all callers get through the first time. Then, I can decide what I want to do with the caller. There is also a built in spam filter on GrandCentral.

    I set it to send bill collectors for bills that I am paying a little late to voicemail. The phone never rings. I set the telemarketers to the blacklist and they hear a recording that the number is disconnected. Again, the phone never even rings.

    I can only imagine the trouble this device causes. The CID is sent between the first and second ring. So, the phone must ring at least once. Either the device hides this from you, or you will hear at least one ring.

    Anyways, GrandCentral is a far better option than this device. I can go a step farther and set certain numbers to only ring certain phones like my cell, or home. I can switch from my cell phone to home phone on the same call. I can even record incomming calls with GrandCentral.

    However, I imagine that Asterisk is the best option. I just have yet to set up Asterisk; so, I can't really say too much about it.

  64. I want this for pre-paid cellular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a variety of caller ID doodads you can buy for land lines that screen your calls, so this idea isn't that new.

    But what I really want is white-list/black-list capability for my pre-paid cell phone. I don't want my minutes wasted if I inadvertently answer a robo-call. (Apparently the FCC's 1088G has no teeth. Meh. But at least I tried.) So I only want the phone to ring on numbers that I flag which I saved earlier in memory. But unfortunately I live in the U.S. and not Japan or South Korea where they do have this particular service available to them. Why can't U.S. based cellular providers deliver? (And at pennies if not for free, because all it should take is a modest firmware update to the handsets.)

  65. Re:My dad taught me a game: "winding up the caller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's one I've never tried but have wanted to: Have an airhorn ready by the phone. When spam marketer calls, speak in really soft voice, holding the mouthpiece quite a ways away from your mouth, and say that there's been problems with the phone, so they will need to turn up the volume on their receiver (they're probably on a headset). Then, blast the airhorn directly into the mouthpiece.

  66. My Dad has this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It intercepts calls from calling cards, so it kind of sucks.

  67. Anyone remember the YOYO by big island? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have this old Apple laptop, a 5300c if you care.

    Anyhow, it runs this little box called a YOYO.

    I use it to filter my incoming calls.

    I run the line off the de-mark point into the YOYO and then out to the handsets.

    If your on my spam list, the phone rings once to show the caller id and that's it.

    Works great.

  68. Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This device sounds like what we were promised (but never delivered) with Caller ID boxes in the first place. We were promised that we would have a box connected to our phone line that could work off a white list or a black list, or even a combination of the two.

    This device should have the ability to treat calls with CID blocked as a blacklisted number. It should answer, then disconnect immedietly. No business or government agency should even have the option to block CID. That option should only be available to private individuals

  69. Re:My dad taught me a game: "winding up the caller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like what a friends dad did once...Listened through all the speal, acted interested, until discussing payment options. When asked about credit cards, he replied "do you accept food stamps?" They said "You don't have a credit card or a bank debit card?". He said "No, all I got is food stamps." They said "you couldn't pay with a money order or check?" He said "No, all I got is food stamps." They hung up on him, and to my knowlege that advertiser has never called him back!

  70. Revenge part 2 by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

    I don't get to many Telemarketing calls since I put my number(s) on the DNC. But when I do I love to F@#$ with them. Two of my favorite are:

    1) Start breathing heavily into the phone, ask the caller (male or female) what color underwear they are wearing. (Continue to breath heavily). Ask them to touch themselves. (Continue to breath heavily) If they haven't hung up by then, continue to breath heavily and make more very suggestive comments until they do. But make THEM hang up.

    2) Politelty start to listen to the caller, then clamly say "Honey, put down the gun." say to the caller "Uh-huh". Then a little more alarmingly say "Hone, PLEASE put the gun down." say to the caller "Uh-huh". Then say "Honey, PLEASE hand me the gun." say to the caller "Uh-huh". Then in a very alarmed voice say "HONEY, NOOOOOO!", drop the phone handset, then immdiately hang it up. That should scare the cr@p out of a telemarketer.

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
  71. I don't see a mention of by Whuffo · · Score: 1
    Grand Central

    http://www.grandcentral.com/

    It does all that's been mentioned in this thread and a lot more. Give it a try someday.

  72. My parents had this for years by Tsu-na-mi · · Score: 1

    If a call was entered in their identified callers list, it would ring through. If not, The phone would respond: "If your call is of a sales or telemarketing nature, please hang up now, otherwise press 1# to continue". I had to do this for quite a while before I finally got my mom to enter my number into the phone.

    --
    I've built up so much character I have an alter-ego
  73. Re:The Only Thing I Have to Say - Where Can I Buy by DrVomact · · Score: 1

    Nothing gets my blood pressure rising more than phone calls coming in that are not welcomed.

    Except text messages to my cell phone from some spammer giving me a "hot" stock tip. Heck, some of the messages I get don't even make sense. I only get about 1 a week, but it still bothers me. With T Mobile, at any rate, my only recourse is to turn off text messaging totally—they won't let me submit a "white list" of people I want to text, or anything like that.

    --
    Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
  74. Easy Captcha "press 1 for alice, press 2 for bob" by billstewart · · Score: 1

    The simple captcha is just "press 1 to speak to Alice, 2 to speak to Bob, stay on to leave a message" etc. If it gets too popular and scammers start sending "1" tones, then "press 1 to hang up, 2 to speak to us, stay on to leave a message"

    I'll have to try your cellphone trick - the interesting question is how widely they spread their internal DNC info (since they don't seem to care when I tell them to put me on their DNC list.) I've mostly been encouraging the auto-warranty scammers by letting them give me a price on my late-1980s Chevy Van (with randomly altered details), though at some point if I feel patient I may string them along about the 2005 Porsche (which actually belonged to my neighbor's kid, was more like a 1995, and the repo men got it when he went to jail :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  75. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is exactly the functionality I have with grand central, and have for 2 1/2 years now.

    Say what you will about google, I like this one.

  76. GrandCentral by Ender77 · · Score: 1

    This is why I love Google's GrandCentral. It does this and more. I have been using them for a while and have been really happy with it. The only complaint is that they are not allowing any new users and there has been no word from GrandCentral for a while.

  77. There's a gadget that might help... by DrVomact · · Score: 1

    Back before the national Do Not Call law went through, I used to have a little device that plugged into my phone line between the phone and the line out. Apparently, it was able to tell the difference between a manually dialed call and an auto-dialer; as I recall, it did a good job of weeding out most junk calls. It was called a "Tele-Zapper". After the DNC law passed, I got rid of it, because I figured I'd never need it again. Well, I'm getting more and more junk calls again, so I think I'm going to have to get a new one. I notice Amazon sells them: http://www.amazon.com/Privacy-Technologies-TZ-900-TeleZapper-900/dp/B00006881R/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top. (This is not an endorsement, and I don't work for them...I can only say that I recall the device worked well for me.)

    --
    Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
  78. Finally, a solution by PPH · · Score: 1

    This little old lady has been calling me repeatedly. Now I have a way to stop her!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  79. LOL Gadget, you mean 'physical device' by danwat1234 · · Score: 1

    I was wondering which cell-phone this 'Gadget' was for. I would have hoped it would have been software for the Iphone or Gphone (Or any other cell-phone in which this may be possible). But no, its a physical device I guess. Saying the words 'gadget' and 'widget' on a geek web site need to be said carefully.

  80. If you have an s60 phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can use Advanced Call Manager to do this and more. I've been using it on my E71 ever since I started getting the damn car warranty calls, and haven't had to deal with the damn calls for the past few months.

  81. California Proposition spammercalls by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I don't expect many calls about Presidential candidates, since California looks solidly Obama, but I have been called about Prop 8, the anti-gay-marriage initiative. (Unfortunately I didn't have time to tell the callers why they should be ashamed of themselves...)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  82. Sometimes number info gets lost by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Sometimes calls don't have number info with them even if the caller isn't blocking caller id, for a variety of random reasons. You probably want a less hostile message; spammers aren't going to improve their behaviour, and there's no point in being hostile to non-spammers. If any real humans call you from blocked numbers and complain that you're not answering, you can tell them that they'll need to unblock.

    But if you do get annoyance calls with numbers, then yeah, give them the no-ring treatment and maybe the line-disconnected tri-tone beep in your answering message.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Sometimes number info gets lost by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Actually, I talked with someone recently who just added the tri-tone beep to their outgoing message. He said its absolutely worked wonders.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  83. Re:End user instead of service provider -- I like by earlymon · · Score: 1

    AT&T genius at work: available features include Caller ID and Privacy Manager.

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  84. A question by htz · · Score: 1

    What about Safeway cashiers and their charity scam? Is there any gadget coming out soon that will zap 'em every time they do that?

  85. This isn't new by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    This isn't even remotely new, I had this service on our home phone in 1996 from the phone company. Costs a couple bucks a month, did the exact same thing.

    It also probably has went away since then, I know the phone company where I live now doesn't offer the service, nor does my cell phone provider allow me to block specific numbers. I'm guessing there is some reason where they get paid more by not blocking the numbers so they just don't provide the service anymore, but this is in no way something new.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  86. Oh, great: Yet Another Boneheaded Blacklist.... by macraig · · Score: 1

    I just love false positives, don't you? I'd like to extend that to my phone calls as well as my e-mail... can you do that for me? Thanks!

  87. Available in the US for years by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 1

    There's a company called http://www.interceptorid.com/ who have had a product out doing this for a few years - and it's been mentioned on /. as well. Blacklists, whitelists, private time, it does them all.

  88. My asterisk even adds Rick Roll to *99.... by Pitawg · · Score: 1

    Blacklist or no-CallerID, where members get tri-tone-bad-number recordings... Whitelist for follow-me-to-my-cell-phone... Custom recordings for listed callers to have something to hear just for them before I even get a ring (Happy BDay Mom!!) even scheduled by date or time.

    Do not leave it black and white though. Area Codes, where you receive calls from people you know, can identify most callers you do not need to know about, when they bother to send CallerID.

    For the ones that get through all of this, a little custom feature with *00 codes. Audio of Rick Astley's best at the touch of a button. Choose your own style of "kiss off" message. Mine will even add the number to the blacklist as playing.

    Asterisk may not be simple, but the fun was just too much to pass up!

    As for the robo-calls that do not like to hang up, I have found that many of these will also not be able to hang up when you call them. I have redialed until I catch them between dials, where they pick up the line to dial another number. I then transfer to call parking and it kills their dialing for several hours sometime. Unless a person is monitoring the "NO DIAL TONE" counts on their end, it can stay for hours.

  89. My POTS line has this? by DewDude · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who's had this for a while. My phone company has been doing "call intercept" on my line for the last 8 years. Numbers I select, or ones that have valid ID information get passed to the phone. Unknown numbers are required to do the same as this gadget...identify themselves or they're not passed. If i refuse to accept the call for whatever reason, the number gets blocked and they receieve the same "this number is not accepting your call" every time they call..my phone never rings. It's worked well for the recent rash of mass internet-lines calling from invalid numbers, null numbers (which don't show up as out of area or unavailable, but as 00000 or "No Data Sent) - not only that but it got bundled with my phone service simply by asking for it. But also, wouldn't you have to install this thing at the master incoming line, for the whole house? Plugging it up to a phone would still cause the phones to ring with an inital call is made.

  90. Re:Police "charities" by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I remember getting one fundraising call from the "California Narcotics Officers Association" or some name like that - not only do they work for the drug war, but they were lobbying to get rid of medical marijuana, back when my father was dying of cancer (though not in California, and he didn't have chemo-related nausea until his last couple of weeks.) The call was placed by a telemarketing shop rather than the cops themselves, and I told them how sleazy the organization they were fundraising for was...

    Meanwhile, in more recent news, California's cops are now being forced to tell people that just having the license plate from from their official charity isn't supposed to get you out of traffic tickets (wink wink, nudge nudge...).

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  91. Re:round here we call that fangled gadget a secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    linux+asterisk box hooked on the line?
    Put them throught a hell of menus and lift alike music... Call me unsocial bastard, or call my customers anoying techno-analphabets...

  92. $ a minute work by IdeaMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not a huge fine, just make it # cents per minute, like a 900 number. Any phone call not on the white list has to pay to contact me.
    If they want to waste my time, they pay for it.

    --
    They ARE out to get you simply because They are in it for themselves and they don't care about you.
  93. Spam me once... by dzCepheus · · Score: 1

    Spam me once, shame on... Shame on you. Spam me... You can't get spammed again.

  94. What do we have to hide? by IdeaMan · · Score: 1

    We don't have anything to hide except our privacy. So yes, basically everything.

    I wouldn't mind giving my ID only to my friends, however that's not one of the options I have. Only options I have are: Give out ID/Not give out ID.

    --
    They ARE out to get you simply because They are in it for themselves and they don't care about you.
    1. Re:What do we have to hide? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well, if i'm being called by a friend, i would like to know it's them calling, or else i won't answer it...
      And if it's a company, surely its in their interest for you to know they called and be able to identify them from the number?

      I demand to know who it is before i will speak to them, so anonymous calls never get answered.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  95. Already Exists by klausner · · Score: 1

    Already have a program like this on my cell phone. It's called (very originally) "Call Block", at http://www.wishsolutions.com. You can whitelist and/or blacklist numbers, block calls at certain hours, let calls go to voicemail, or pickup and hangup to prevent that. Doesn't play messages to the callers though.

  96. Re:My dad taught me a game: "winding up the caller by Kalriath · · Score: 1

    Doing that might actually be illegal if it causes damage to their hearing. And rightly so.

    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  97. "Legal issues" by Fish+(David+Trout) · · Score: 1

    "But there are "legal issues" that need to be resolved before this "telephonic neighbourhood watch" can be put into action, said a spokesman for the company."

    Yeah, like maybe admitting that your new "invention" that "basically intercepts all calls" has already been invented by someone else here in the states. Someone called Verizon. They've been offering their "Call Intercept" calling feature for quite a few years now:

    CALL INTERCEPT

    Screen calls - even from anonymous callers.

    Call Intercept screens unidentified calls and lets you handle them however you like. Fewer unwanted calls means more peace and quiet for you at home.

    How Call Intercept Works

        * This automated service works with Caller ID service.

        * Unidentified callers that typically show up as "Anonymous," "Out of Area," "Private" or "Unavailable" on your Caller ID display are prompted to record their identity before your phone rings.*

        * Once the caller records his or her identity, the service alerts you with a unique ring and displays "Call Intercept" on your Caller ID unit.

        * When you pick up the phone, Call Intercept plays the recording and then gives you several options for handling the call.

    Additional Benefits

        * Unidentified callers who don't record their name hear a pre-recorded message stating that you do not accept unidentified calls, and then are disconnected.

        * Use of a four-digit Personal Identification Number (PIN) that you choose allows friends and family to bypass the screening process. When Call Intercept is bypassed using the PIN, you hear a unique ring and "Priority Call" appears on the Caller ID display.

        * If no one answers, Call Intercept will allow the caller to leave a message on your answering machine or Home Voice Mail service.

        * You have the ability to change your four-digit Personal Identification Number (PIN) and to turn Call Intercept on and off. Simply dial 1 800 527 7070 and follow the voice prompts.

    Source:

        http://tinyurl.com/5qprsu (web page)

    or:

        http://tinyurl.com/5qprsu (PDF)

    --
    "Fish" (David B. Trout)
  98. I would mod you up JUST for your sig... by ShadowSystems · · Score: 1

    (Grumbling) Damned monkeys...
    =)P

  99. a simple device already in existance by zeldor · · Score: 1

    http://www.calleridboost.com/p2p.htm

    used one for years now. or at least I gave up a landline for cell only.

    --
    If I could walk that way I wouldnt need cologne.
  100. Better variation by Geminii · · Score: 1
    It's not just enough to block the call. I want to actively waste the time and resources of the telemarketer - or, to be precise, have them to waste their own resources.

    "Blocked" calls should instead be switched to a service which uses voice generation software and genetic algorithms to continually refine itself with the goal of making each incoming call last as long as possible before the caller hangs up. Tarpitting, basically.

    As a bonus, use the centralised service to generate something like a Breidbart Index, so that a number which is multiply reported as the source of unwanted calls gets indexed into a global block list which every participating device can download.

    Any number which annoys more than a handful of subscribers, then, for any reason at all, would suddenly find a percentage of its attempted cold calls being tarpitted - perhaps to the point where it significantly affects their outgoing call capacity.

    As ever, non-CID numbers would get an answerphone. Globally blocked numbers would stay on the list for a week or so by default - long enough to inconvenience cold-callers, but no so long as to permanently inconvenience someone who was given a reassigned number.

  101. Re:My dad taught me a game: "winding up the caller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the greatest prank call ever.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5z4Vs26-TI

    this is one idea in the "National Security drop number" act you where talking about

    i really like the answer and then lay down the phone tactic